jiebi/CodeConvo huggingface dataset:
Code change:
In RTL, these texts will be broken, because they are a mix of special character, numbers, which follow different direction in RTL than LTR. ~1.2.13 1.2.x 1.x.x To fix these, add code elements around the version number. File: change to there are multiple instances in these files All of them should be wrapped in code elements Speaking of weird interactions. Using special characters that relay on direction will break in RTL, because it will be reverted, in example. will be we can wrap in
I want to contribute towards this issue. Can you assign this issue to me.
The first comprehensive PR created will be reviewed and merged. We typically do not assign issues to anyone other than long-time contributors. If you would like to contribute, and have not read the contributors docs, please do so here: If you have any issues with contributing, be sure to join us on the , or on the

Related discussion:
text: When you are done, make sure a working demo of your project is hosted somewhere public. Then submit the URL to it in the Solution Link field. <del> The `package.json` file is the center of any Node.js project or npm package. It stores information about your project, similar to how the &lt;head> section of an HTML document describes the content of a webpage. It consists of a single JSON object where information is stored in key-value pairs. There are only two required fields; "name" and "version", but it’s good practice to provide additional information about your project that could be useful to future users or maintainers. </del> <ins> The `package.json` file is the center of any Node.js project or npm package. It stores information about your project, similar to how the `head` section of an HTML document describes the content of a webpage. It consists of a single JSON object where information is stored in key-value pairs. There are only two required fields; `name` and `version`, but it’s good practice to provide additional information about your project that could be useful to future users or maintainers. </ins> <del> If you look at the file tree of your project, you will find the package.json file on the top level of the tree. This is the file that you will be improving in the next couple of challenges. </del> <ins> If you look at the file tree of your project, you will find the `package.json` file on the top level of the tree. This is the file that you will be improving in the next couple of challenges. </ins> One of the most common pieces of information in this file is the `author` field. It specifies who created the project, and can consist of a string or an object with contact or other details. An object is recommended for bigger projects, but a simple string like the following example will do for this project.
Code change:
In RTL, these texts will be broken, because they are a mix of special character, numbers, which follow different direction in RTL than LTR. ~1.2.13 1.2.x 1.x.x To fix these, add code elements around the version number. File: change to there are multiple instances in these files All of them should be wrapped in code elements Speaking of weird interactions. Using special characters that relay on direction will break in RTL, because it will be reverted, in example. will be we can wrap in
I want to contribute towards this issue. Can you assign this issue to me.
The first comprehensive PR created will be reviewed and merged. We typically do not assign issues to anyone other than long-time contributors. If you would like to contribute, and have not read the contributors docs, please do so here: If you have any issues with contributing, be sure to join us on the , or on the

Related discussion:
text: # --instructions-- <del> Add your name as the `author` of the project in the package.json file. </del> <ins> Add your name as the `author` of the project in the `package.json` file. </ins> **Note:** Remember that you’re writing JSON, so all field names must use double-quotes (") and be separated with a comma (,). # --hints-- <del> package.json should have a valid "author" key </del> <ins> `package.json` should have a valid "author" key </ins> ```js (getUserInput) =>
Code change:
In RTL, these texts will be broken, because they are a mix of special character, numbers, which follow different direction in RTL than LTR. ~1.2.13 1.2.x 1.x.x To fix these, add code elements around the version number. File: change to there are multiple instances in these files All of them should be wrapped in code elements Speaking of weird interactions. Using special characters that relay on direction will break in RTL, because it will be reverted, in example. will be we can wrap in
I want to contribute towards this issue. Can you assign this issue to me.
The first comprehensive PR created will be reviewed and merged. We typically do not assign issues to anyone other than long-time contributors. If you would like to contribute, and have not read the contributors docs, please do so here: If you have any issues with contributing, be sure to join us on the , or on the

Related discussion:
text: Similar to how the tilde we learned about in the last challenge allows npm to install the latest PATCH for a dependency, the caret (`^`) allows npm to install future updates as well. The difference is that the caret will allow both MINOR updates and PATCHes. <del> Your current version of `@freecodecamp/example` should be "~1.2.13" which allows npm to install to the latest 1.2.x version. If you were to use the caret (^) as a version prefix instead, npm would be allowed to update to any 1.x.x version. </del> <ins> Your current version of `@freecodecamp/example` should be `~1.2.13` which allows npm to install to the latest `1.2.x` version. If you were to use the caret (^) as a version prefix instead, npm would be allowed to update to any `1.x.x` version. </ins> ```json "package": "^1.3.8" ``` <del> This would allow updates to any 1.x.x version of the package. </del> <ins> This would allow updates to any `1.x.x` version of the package. </ins> # --instructions--
Code change:
In RTL, these texts will be broken, because they are a mix of special character, numbers, which follow different direction in RTL than LTR. ~1.2.13 1.2.x 1.x.x To fix these, add code elements around the version number. File: change to there are multiple instances in these files All of them should be wrapped in code elements Speaking of weird interactions. Using special characters that relay on direction will break in RTL, because it will be reverted, in example. will be we can wrap in
I want to contribute towards this issue. Can you assign this issue to me.
The first comprehensive PR created will be reviewed and merged. We typically do not assign issues to anyone other than long-time contributors. If you would like to contribute, and have not read the contributors docs, please do so here: If you have any issues with contributing, be sure to join us on the , or on the

Related discussion:
text: In the last challenge, you told npm to only include a specific version of a package. That’s a useful way to freeze your dependencies if you need to make sure that different parts of your project stay compatible with each other. But in most use cases, you don’t want to miss bug fixes since they often include important security patches and (hopefully) don’t break things in doing so. <del> To allow an npm dependency to update to the latest PATCH version, you can prefix the dependency’s version with the tilde (`~`) character. Here's an example of how to allow updates to any 1.3.x version. </del> <ins> To allow an npm dependency to update to the latest PATCH version, you can prefix the dependency’s version with the tilde (`~`) character. Here's an example of how to allow updates to any `1.3.x` version. </ins> ```json "package": "~1.3.8"
Code change:
In RTL, these texts will be broken, because they are a mix of special character, numbers, which follow different direction in RTL than LTR. ~1.2.13 1.2.x 1.x.x To fix these, add code elements around the version number. File: change to there are multiple instances in these files All of them should be wrapped in code elements Speaking of weird interactions. Using special characters that relay on direction will break in RTL, because it will be reverted, in example. will be we can wrap in
I want to contribute towards this issue. Can you assign this issue to me.
The first comprehensive PR created will be reviewed and merged. We typically do not assign issues to anyone other than long-time contributors. If you would like to contribute, and have not read the contributors docs, please do so here: If you have any issues with contributing, be sure to join us on the , or on the

Related discussion:
text: # --instructions-- <del> In the package.json file, your current rule for how npm may upgrade `@freecodecamp/example` is to use a specific version (1.2.13). But now, you want to allow the latest 1.2.x version. </del> <ins> In the package.json file, your current rule for how npm may upgrade `@freecodecamp/example` is to use a specific version (`1.2.13`). But now, you want to allow the latest `1.2.x` version. </ins> Use the tilde (`~`) character to prefix the version of `@freecodecamp/example` in your dependencies, and allow npm to update it to any new _patch_ release.
Code change:
'just' is a bad word. If it doesn't already, our style guide should dissuade it. It implies the task is 'simple' which can frustrate learners who don't get it right. N/A Text should use friendly language. Possible fix: Note: the selector technically doesn't have the properties; the selector is part of a CSS rule that sets the desired properties. No response All No response_

Related discussion:
text: Something does not look right. You added the correct `class` attribute value to the `p` element with `Donut` as its text, but you have not defined a selector for it. <del> Since the `flavor` class selector already has the properties you want, just add the `dessert` class name to it. </del> <ins> The CSS rule for the `flavor` class already sets the properties you want. Add the `dessert` class as an additional selector for this CSS rule. </ins> # --hints--
Code change:
We have instances which is used to provide spacing for both side of the component to wrap it up in specific space Example: We can make the Spacer component smarter, and allow it to accept children, so the code be like. But in doing so, we need to: change the current values and how the padding is calculated, the old layout shouldn't change with the new spacers. change which padding has the new value, I think paddingBlock, which is paddingTop and paddingBottom, is the new padding property . I am requesting this because this will make live simpler, and we have to worry about less elements while controling the layout, and if we have specific cases, we can still use
There is an abstraction with , we need address, it's better if we can specify the direction of the padding. but this can be sorted in another issue, for now to solve this issue please allow to have children prop inside of it, but the current styles of the curriculum shouldn't change. If you would like to fix this issue, please make sure you read , we prioritize contributors following the instructions in our guides. Join us in or if you need help contributing, our prolific contributors will guide you through this.
Hey I have few questions while looking into this issue are few files where we have used Spacer, so may I just change wrap the content where ever needed or it would be handled in new issue? (I guess it must be done in other issue, as it would be easy to maintain) have implemented the children props, so may I raise a PR? Will break this issue in 2 other issues as well. 1 for wrapping the places it has been used, and 2nd for specifying the direction. I was wrapping and trying it out, I found out that Spacer has been used at every 2nd-3rd line of code, so do we need such a wrapper which would give spacing to all components present inside it or only to the parent component? EG: If we have 2 divs wrapped inside Spacer, then does both div have the spacing around them or only the outmost div.
sorry for the delay, it was difficult to understand what you mean without looking at an example of code, so to answer you: yes the direction will be in a second issue, but the spacing and values should still be in this issue, so the pages won't look different Of course, please raise a PR after reading the guideline, nicely done . The Spacer shouldn't affect the children inside of it, think of it as creating a container with margin-block to space the area of the children inside of it from other areas
I guess we could close this issue
will be closed when the height is removed in the other PR

Related discussion:
text: } const Spacer = ({ size, children }: SpacerProps): JSX.Element => ( <del> <div className='spacer' style={{ padding: `${Padding[size]}px 0`, height: '1px' }} > </del> <ins> <div className='spacer' style={{ padding: `${Padding[size]}px 0` }}> </ins> {children} </div> );
Code change:
We have instances which is used to provide spacing for both side of the component to wrap it up in specific space Example: We can make the Spacer component smarter, and allow it to accept children, so the code be like. But in doing so, we need to: change the current values and how the padding is calculated, the old layout shouldn't change with the new spacers. change which padding has the new value, I think paddingBlock, which is paddingTop and paddingBottom, is the new padding property . I am requesting this because this will make live simpler, and we have to worry about less elements while controling the layout, and if we have specific cases, we can still use
There is an abstraction with , we need address, it's better if we can specify the direction of the padding. but this can be sorted in another issue, for now to solve this issue please allow to have children prop inside of it, but the current styles of the curriculum shouldn't change. If you would like to fix this issue, please make sure you read , we prioritize contributors following the instructions in our guides. Join us in or if you need help contributing, our prolific contributors will guide you through this.
Hey I have few questions while looking into this issue are few files where we have used Spacer, so may I just change wrap the content where ever needed or it would be handled in new issue? (I guess it must be done in other issue, as it would be easy to maintain) have implemented the children props, so may I raise a PR? Will break this issue in 2 other issues as well. 1 for wrapping the places it has been used, and 2nd for specifying the direction. I was wrapping and trying it out, I found out that Spacer has been used at every 2nd-3rd line of code, so do we need such a wrapper which would give spacing to all components present inside it or only to the parent component? EG: If we have 2 divs wrapped inside Spacer, then does both div have the spacing around them or only the outmost div.
sorry for the delay, it was difficult to understand what you mean without looking at an example of code, so to answer you: yes the direction will be in a second issue, but the spacing and values should still be in this issue, so the pages won't look different Of course, please raise a PR after reading the guideline, nicely done . The Spacer shouldn't affect the children inside of it, think of it as creating a container with margin-block to space the area of the children inside of it from other areas
I guess we could close this issue
will be closed when the height is removed in the other PR

Related discussion:
text: <div> <div class="spacer" <del> style="padding: 15px 0px; height: 1px;" </del> <ins> style="padding: 15px 0px;" </ins> /> <div class="container" > <div class="spacer" <del> style="padding: 15px 0px; height: 1px;" </del> <ins> style="padding: 15px 0px;" </ins> /> <div> <div
Code change:
We have instances which is used to provide spacing for both side of the component to wrap it up in specific space Example: We can make the Spacer component smarter, and allow it to accept children, so the code be like. But in doing so, we need to: change the current values and how the padding is calculated, the old layout shouldn't change with the new spacers. change which padding has the new value, I think paddingBlock, which is paddingTop and paddingBottom, is the new padding property . I am requesting this because this will make live simpler, and we have to worry about less elements while controling the layout, and if we have specific cases, we can still use
There is an abstraction with , we need address, it's better if we can specify the direction of the padding. but this can be sorted in another issue, for now to solve this issue please allow to have children prop inside of it, but the current styles of the curriculum shouldn't change. If you would like to fix this issue, please make sure you read , we prioritize contributors following the instructions in our guides. Join us in or if you need help contributing, our prolific contributors will guide you through this.
Hey I have few questions while looking into this issue are few files where we have used Spacer, so may I just change wrap the content where ever needed or it would be handled in new issue? (I guess it must be done in other issue, as it would be easy to maintain) have implemented the children props, so may I raise a PR? Will break this issue in 2 other issues as well. 1 for wrapping the places it has been used, and 2nd for specifying the direction. I was wrapping and trying it out, I found out that Spacer has been used at every 2nd-3rd line of code, so do we need such a wrapper which would give spacing to all components present inside it or only to the parent component? EG: If we have 2 divs wrapped inside Spacer, then does both div have the spacing around them or only the outmost div.
sorry for the delay, it was difficult to understand what you mean without looking at an example of code, so to answer you: yes the direction will be in a second issue, but the spacing and values should still be in this issue, so the pages won't look different Of course, please raise a PR after reading the guideline, nicely done . The Spacer shouldn't affect the children inside of it, think of it as creating a container with margin-block to space the area of the children inside of it from other areas
I guess we could close this issue
will be closed when the height is removed in the other PR

Related discussion:
text: </div> <div class="spacer" <del> style="padding: 15px 0px; height: 1px;" </del> <ins> style="padding: 15px 0px;" </ins> /> <div class="text-center row"
Code change:
We have instances which is used to provide spacing for both side of the component to wrap it up in specific space Example: We can make the Spacer component smarter, and allow it to accept children, so the code be like. But in doing so, we need to: change the current values and how the padding is calculated, the old layout shouldn't change with the new spacers. change which padding has the new value, I think paddingBlock, which is paddingTop and paddingBottom, is the new padding property . I am requesting this because this will make live simpler, and we have to worry about less elements while controling the layout, and if we have specific cases, we can still use
There is an abstraction with , we need address, it's better if we can specify the direction of the padding. but this can be sorted in another issue, for now to solve this issue please allow to have children prop inside of it, but the current styles of the curriculum shouldn't change. If you would like to fix this issue, please make sure you read , we prioritize contributors following the instructions in our guides. Join us in or if you need help contributing, our prolific contributors will guide you through this.
Hey I have few questions while looking into this issue are few files where we have used Spacer, so may I just change wrap the content where ever needed or it would be handled in new issue? (I guess it must be done in other issue, as it would be easy to maintain) have implemented the children props, so may I raise a PR? Will break this issue in 2 other issues as well. 1 for wrapping the places it has been used, and 2nd for specifying the direction. I was wrapping and trying it out, I found out that Spacer has been used at every 2nd-3rd line of code, so do we need such a wrapper which would give spacing to all components present inside it or only to the parent component? EG: If we have 2 divs wrapped inside Spacer, then does both div have the spacing around them or only the outmost div.
sorry for the delay, it was difficult to understand what you mean without looking at an example of code, so to answer you: yes the direction will be in a second issue, but the spacing and values should still be in this issue, so the pages won't look different Of course, please raise a PR after reading the guideline, nicely done . The Spacer shouldn't affect the children inside of it, think of it as creating a container with margin-block to space the area of the children inside of it from other areas
I guess we could close this issue
will be closed when the height is removed in the other PR

Related discussion:
text: </div> <div class="spacer" <del> style="padding: 15px 0px; height: 1px;" </del> <ins> style="padding: 15px 0px;" </ins> /> </div> </div>
Code change:
We have instances which is used to provide spacing for both side of the component to wrap it up in specific space Example: We can make the Spacer component smarter, and allow it to accept children, so the code be like. But in doing so, we need to: change the current values and how the padding is calculated, the old layout shouldn't change with the new spacers. change which padding has the new value, I think paddingBlock, which is paddingTop and paddingBottom, is the new padding property . I am requesting this because this will make live simpler, and we have to worry about less elements while controling the layout, and if we have specific cases, we can still use
There is an abstraction with , we need address, it's better if we can specify the direction of the padding. but this can be sorted in another issue, for now to solve this issue please allow to have children prop inside of it, but the current styles of the curriculum shouldn't change. If you would like to fix this issue, please make sure you read , we prioritize contributors following the instructions in our guides. Join us in or if you need help contributing, our prolific contributors will guide you through this.
Hey I have few questions while looking into this issue are few files where we have used Spacer, so may I just change wrap the content where ever needed or it would be handled in new issue? (I guess it must be done in other issue, as it would be easy to maintain) have implemented the children props, so may I raise a PR? Will break this issue in 2 other issues as well. 1 for wrapping the places it has been used, and 2nd for specifying the direction. I was wrapping and trying it out, I found out that Spacer has been used at every 2nd-3rd line of code, so do we need such a wrapper which would give spacing to all components present inside it or only to the parent component? EG: If we have 2 divs wrapped inside Spacer, then does both div have the spacing around them or only the outmost div.
sorry for the delay, it was difficult to understand what you mean without looking at an example of code, so to answer you: yes the direction will be in a second issue, but the spacing and values should still be in this issue, so the pages won't look different Of course, please raise a PR after reading the guideline, nicely done . The Spacer shouldn't affect the children inside of it, think of it as creating a container with margin-block to space the area of the children inside of it from other areas
I guess we could close this issue
will be closed when the height is removed in the other PR

Related discussion:
text: className="spacer" style={ { <del> "height": "1px", </del> "padding": "5px 0", } }