Code change:
br br a.btn.nonprofit-cta.btn-success(href="/nonprofits") I'm with a nonprofit and want help coding something <del> include partials/about include partials/faq </del>  No newline at end of file <ins> .big-break h2 Campers you'll hang out with: .row .col-xs-12.col-sm-12.col-md-4 img.img-responsive.testimonial-image.img-center(src="https://s3.amazonaws.com/freecodecamp/testimonial-jen.jpg", alt="@jenthebest's testimonial image") .testimonial-copy Getting back on track with Free Code Camp and committing to a new career in 2015! h3 - @jenthebest .col-xs-12.col-sm-12.col-md-4 img.img-responsive.testimonial-image.img-center(src="https://s3.amazonaws.com/freecodecamp/testimonial-tate.jpg", alt="@TateThurston's testimonial image") .testimonial-copy Just built my company's website with skills I've learned from Free Code Camp! h3 - @TateThurston .col-xs-12.col-sm-12.col-md-4 img.img-responsive.testimonial-image.img-center(src="https://s3.amazonaws.com/freecodecamp/testimonial-cynthia.jpg", alt="@cynthialanel's testimonial image") .testimonial-copy  I'm currently working through Free Code Camp to improve my JavaScript. The community is very welcoming! h3 - @cynthialanel .big-break h2 Skills you'll learn: .text-center .col-xs-12.col-sm-12.col-md-3 .landing-skill-icon.ion-social-html5 .black-text HTML5 .col-xs-12.col-sm-12.col-md-3 .landing-skill-icon.ion-social-css3 .black-text CSS3 .col-xs-12.col-sm-12.col-md-3 .landing-skill-icon.ion-social-javascript .black-text JavaScript .col-xs-12.col-sm-12.col-md-3 .landing-skill-icon.fa.fa-database.font-awesome-padding .black-text Databases .col-xs-12.col-sm-12.col-md-3 .landing-skill-icon.ion-social-chrome .black-text DevTools .col-xs-12.col-sm-12.col-md-3 .landing-skill-icon.ion-social-nodejs .black-text Node.js .col-xs-12.col-sm-12.col-md-3 .landing-skill-icon.ion-social-angular .black-text Angular.js .col-xs-12.col-sm-12.col-md-3 .landing-skill-icon.ion-ios-loop-strong .black-text Agile .big-break h2 &nbsp; h2 Fast facts about our community: h3.col-xs-offset-0.col-sm-offset-1.col-md-offset-2 ul.text-left li.ion-code &nbsp; We're 100% free and open source li.ion-code &nbsp; We're thousands of professionals who are learning to code li.ion-code &nbsp; We're building projects for dozens of nonprofits li.ion-code &nbsp; We share one goal: to boost our careers with code .big-break a.btn.btn-cta.signup-btn(href="/login") Start learning to code (it's free) </ins>  No newline at end of file

Related discussion:
text: <!-- FreeCodeCamp Issue Template --<!-- NOTE: ISSUES ARE NOT FOR CODE HELP - Ask for Help at --<!-- Please provide as much detail as possible for us to fix your issue --<!-- Remove any heading sections you did not fill out --<!-- Insert link to challenge below -- <!-- Describe below when the issue happens and how to reproduce it --The test: Use the ++ operator fails when the pre-increment version of the "++" operator is used (i.e. "++myVar;") rather than the post-increment version. Nothing in the description of the task precludes the pre-increment version being correct. <!-- Describe your workspace in which you are having issues--- Browser Name, Version: various Operating System: various Mobile, Desktop, or Tablet: multiple <!-- Add a screenshot of your issue --!
thanks for the issue. Because we're targeting beginner coders, we wanted the challenges to be simple enough to teach a concept but not overwhelm learners with other details. Same goes for . cc/ worth accepting this prefix operation?
I remember this was and more times in the chat, we could add separate challenges for pre/post increments/decrements. But this is going to be confusing for beginners. Maybe we could relax the tests to allow but not change the test case message. So advanced campers who are attempting these as in this case can pass the challenge and beginners are not overwhelmed as well.
I agree on just accepting the answer for flexibility but not change the test messages. I think editing to the following will work. I'm not sure about escaping the parentheses but whoever takes this will have to check this. The code will break for anyways so I think the above should be okay. There is a similar case in so someone taking this can easily do the other
Won't the above code pass with just ? Since both sections are optional, that will match just . Better to do:
good point. I was being careless Thanks!
Thanks ya’ll! I couldn’t have asked for a better outcome. Having poked your backend with alternate ‘correct' solutions to prior challenges and been impressed with your robust handling of them this situation stuck out a bit. And I was hoping to contribute to the polish of your beautiful project. I appreciate the peak behind the curtain. It confirmed that the modification only required a simple regex edit and that ya’ll really are a copacetic group. Kudos all around!