Comparison of Linux distributions

Columns: Distribution | Default Linux kernel | Default file system | Default init system | Install-time desktop environment or window manager selection | Reproducible builds
Dragora GNU/Linux-Libre | Linux-libre | ext4 | runit | Xfce | No | dyne : bolic | Linux-libre | ? | systemd | GNOME | No | Fedora | Binary blobs | ext4 | systemd | GNOME ( default Workstation Edition ) , Spins for : KDE Plasma Workspaces , Xfce , LXDE , MATE ( with Compiz ) , Cinnamon , Sugar on a Stick | In progress | Funtoo | Binary blobs | none | openrc | None | No | Gentoo | Binary blobs | none | openrc | Awesome , Enlightenment , Fluxbox , GNOME , KDE , LXDE-Meta , Openbox , XBMC and Xfce ( live DVD ) | No | gNewSense | Debian Linux kernel , and ( unlike Debian ) blobs can not be installed | ext3 | sysvinit | GNOME | No

Example questions:
What was the Linux distribution that uses KDE Plasma Workspaces originally based off of ? | What other Linux distribution does the distribution using a runit init system resemble ? | Who sponsors the Linux distribution that is in-progress and using binary blobs ? | Who sponsors the Linux distribution that is unable to install blobs and Debian Linux ? | Who developed the Linux distribution that uses OpenBox for the window manager ?

Answers:
Arch Linux | Slackware | Red Hat Inc. | Free Software Foundation | Philip Newborough