Comparison of Linux distributions

Columns: Distribution | Default Linux kernel | Default file system | Default init system | Install-time desktop environment or window manager selection | Reproducible builds
Alpine Linux | Binary blobs | ext4 | openrc | none | No | ALT Linux | Binary blobs | ext3 | systemd | KDE Plasma Workspaces , Xfce | No | Arch Linux | Binary blobs | none | systemd | none | No | BLAG | Linux-libre | ext3 | sysvinit | GNOME | No | Bodhi Linux | Binary blobs | ext4 | systemd | Moksha ( Enlightenment fork ) | No | Canaima | Binary blobs | ? | systemd | Cinnamon and MATE | No | CentOS | Binary blobs | xfs | systemd | GNOME | No

Example questions:
What was the Linux distribution that uses KDE Plasma Workspaces originally based off of ? | What other Linux distribution does the distribution using a runit init system resemble ? | Who sponsors the Linux distribution that is in-progress and using binary blobs ? | Who sponsors the Linux distribution that is unable to install blobs and Debian Linux ? | Who developed the Linux distribution that uses OpenBox for the window manager ?

Answers:
Arch Linux | Slackware | Red Hat Inc. | Free Software Foundation | Philip Newborough