Comparison of Linux distributions

Columns: Distribution | Default Linux kernel | Default file system | Default init system | Install-time desktop environment or window manager selection | Reproducible builds
Chakra | Binary blobs | ext4 | systemd | KDE Plasma Workspaces | No | ClearOS | Binary blobs | ext3 | systemd | none ( Web based ) | No | CoreOS | Binary blobs | ext4 | systemd | None | No | CrunchBang Linux | Binary blobs | ext4 | sysvinit | Openbox | No | Damn Small Linux | Binary blobs | ext3 | sysvinit | JWM | No | Debian | By default Linux-libre , but the Debian Project also hosts a non-free repository allowing blobs to be installed optionally . Built with Linux-libre tools | ext4 | systemd | GNOME , KDE , Xfce , LXDE | In progress | Devuan | Binary blobs | ext4 | sysvinit | Xfce | No

Example questions:
What was the Linux distribution that uses KDE Plasma Workspaces originally based off of ? | What other Linux distribution does the distribution using a runit init system resemble ? | Who sponsors the Linux distribution that is in-progress and using binary blobs ? | Who sponsors the Linux distribution that is unable to install blobs and Debian Linux ? | Who developed the Linux distribution that uses OpenBox for the window manager ?

Answers:
Arch Linux | Slackware | Red Hat Inc. | Free Software Foundation | Philip Newborough