jeroenherczeg/eu-ai-act huggingface dataset:
Annex III, point 6 AI Act

Annex III — High-risk AI systems referred to in Article 6(2)
Point 6: Law enforcement, in so far as their use is permitted under relevant Union or national law:

6. Law enforcement, in so far as their use is permitted under relevant Union or national law:(a) AI systems intended to be used by or on behalf of law enforcement authorities, or by Union institutions, bodies, offices or agencies in support of law enforcement authorities or on their behalf to assess the risk of a natural person becoming the victim of criminal offences;(b) AI systems intended to be used by or on behalf of law enforcement authorities or by Union institutions, bodies, offices or agencies in support of law enforcement authorities as polygraphs or similar tools;(c) AI systems intended to be used by or on behalf of law enforcement authorities, or by Union institutions, bodies, offices or agencies, in support of law enforcement authorities to evaluate the reliability of evidence in the course of the investigation or prosecution of criminal offences;(d) AI systems intended to be used by law enforcement authorities or on their behalf or by Union institutions, bodies, offices or agencies in support of law enforcement authorities for assessing the risk of a natural person offending or re-offending not solely on the basis of the profiling of natural persons as referred to in Article 3(4) of Directive (EU) 2016/680, or to assess personality traits and characteristics or past criminal behaviour of natural persons or groups;(e) AI systems intended to be used by or on behalf of law enforcement authorities or by Union institutions, bodies, offices or agencies in support of law enforcement authorities for the profiling of natural persons as referred to in Article 3(4) of Directive (EU) 2016/680 in the course of the detection, investigation or prosecution of criminal offences.
Annex III, point 7 AI Act

Annex III — High-risk AI systems referred to in Article 6(2)
Point 7: Migration, asylum and border control management, in so far as their use is permitted under relevant Union or national law:

7. Migration, asylum and border control management, in so far as their use is permitted under relevant Union or national law:(a) AI systems intended to be used by or on behalf of competent public authorities or by Union institutions, bodies, offices or agencies as polygraphs or similar tools;(b) AI systems intended to be used by or on behalf of competent public authorities or by Union institutions, bodies, offices or agencies to assess a risk, including a security risk, a risk of irregular migration, or a health risk, posed by a natural person who intends to enter or who has entered into the territory of a Member State;(c) AI systems intended to be used by or on behalf of competent public authorities or by Union institutions, bodies, offices or agencies to assist competent public authorities for the examination of applications for asylum, visa or residence permits and for associated complaints with regard to the eligibility of the natural persons applying for a status, including related assessments of the reliability of evidence;(d) AI systems intended to be used by or on behalf of competent public authorities, or by Union institutions, bodies, offices or agencies, in the context of migration, asylum or border control management, for the purpose of detecting, recognising or identifying natural persons, with the exception of the verification of travel documents.
Annex III, point 8 AI Act

Annex III — High-risk AI systems referred to in Article 6(2)
Point 8: Administration of justice and democratic processes:

8. Administration of justice and democratic processes:(a) AI systems intended to be used by a judicial authority or on their behalf to assist a judicial authority in researching and interpreting facts and the law and in applying the law to a concrete set of facts, or to be used in a similar way in alternative dispute resolution;(b) AI systems intended to be used for influencing the outcome of an election or referendum or the voting behaviour of natural persons in the exercise of their vote in elections or referenda. This does not include AI systems to the output of which natural persons are not directly exposed, such as tools used to organise, optimise or structure political campaigns from an administrative or logistical point of view.
Annex IV, point 1 AI Act

Annex IV — Technical documentation referred to in Article 11(1)
Point 1: A general description of the AI system including:

1. A general description of the AI system including:(a) its intended purpose, the name of the provider and the version of the system reflecting its relation to previous versions;(b) how the AI system interacts with, or can be used to interact with, hardware or software, including with other AI systems, that are not part of the AI system itself, where applicable;(c) the versions of relevant software or firmware, and any requirements related to version updates;(d) the description of all the forms in which the AI system is placed on the market or put into service, such as software packages embedded into hardware, downloads, or APIs;(e) the description of the hardware on which the AI system is intended to run;(f) where the AI system is a component of products, photographs or illustrations showing external features, the marking and internal layout of those products;(g) a basic description of the user-interface provided to the deployer;(h) instructions for use for the deployer, and a basic description of the user-interface provided to the deployer, where applicable;
Annex IV, point 2 AI Act

Annex IV — Technical documentation referred to in Article 11(1)
Point 2: A detailed description of the elements of the AI system and of the process for its development, including:

2. A detailed description of the elements of the AI system and of the process for its development, including:(a) the methods and steps performed for the development of the AI system, including, where relevant, recourse to pre-trained systems or tools provided by third parties and how those were used, integrated or modified by the provider;(b) the design specifications of the system, namely the general logic of the AI system and of the algorithms; the key design choices including the rationale and assumptions made, including with regard to persons or groups of persons in respect of who, the system is intended to be used; the main classification choices; what the system is designed to optimise for, and the relevance of the different parameters; the description of the expected output and output quality of the system; the decisions about any possible trade-off made regarding the technical solutions adopted to comply with the requirements set out in Chapter III, Section 2;(c) the description of the system architecture explaining how software components build on or feed into each other and integrate into the overall processing; the computational resources used to develop, train, test and validate the AI system;(d) where relevant, the data requirements in terms of datasheets describing the training methodologies and techniques and the training data sets used, including a general description of these data sets, information about their provenance, scope and main characteristics; how the data was obtained and selected; labelling procedures (e.g. for supervised learning), data cleaning methodologies (e.g. outliers detection);(e) assessment of the human oversight measures needed in accordance with Article 14, including an assessment of the technical measures needed to facilitate the interpretation of the outputs of AI systems by the deployers, in accordance with Article 13(3), point (d);(f) where applicable, a detailed description of pre-determined changes to the AI system and its performance, together with all the relevant information related to the technical solutions adopted to ensure continuous compliance of the AI system with the relevant requirements set out in Chapter III, Section 2;(g) the validation and testing procedures used, including information about the validation and testing data used and their main characteristics; metrics used to measure accuracy, robustness and compliance with other relevant requirements set out in Chapter III, Section 2, as well as potentially discriminatory impacts; test logs and all test reports dated and signed by the responsible persons, including with regard to pre-determined changes as referred to under point (f);(h) cybersecurity measures put in place;
Annex IV, point 3 AI Act

Annex IV — Technical documentation referred to in Article 11(1)
Point 3: Detailed information about the monitoring, functioning and control of the AI system, in particular with regard to: its capabilities and limitations in performance, including the degrees of accuracy for specific persons or groups of persons on which the system is intended to be used and the overall expected level of accuracy in relation to its intended purpose; the foreseeable unintended outcomes and sources of risks to health and safety, fundamental rights and discrimination in view of the intended purpose of the AI system; the human oversight measures needed in accordance with Article 14, including the technical measures put in place to facilitate the interpretation of the outputs of AI systems by the deployers; specifications on input data, as appropriate;

3. Detailed information about the monitoring, functioning and control of the AI system, in particular with regard to: its capabilities and limitations in performance, including the degrees of accuracy for specific persons or groups of persons on which the system is intended to be used and the overall expected level of accuracy in relation to its intended purpose; the foreseeable unintended outcomes and sources of risks to health and safety, fundamental rights and discrimination in view of the intended purpose of the AI system; the human oversight measures needed in accordance with Article 14, including the technical measures put in place to facilitate the interpretation of the outputs of AI systems by the deployers; specifications on input data, as appropriate;
Annex IV, point 4 AI Act

Annex IV — Technical documentation referred to in Article 11(1)
Point 4: A description of the appropriateness of the performance metrics for the specific AI system;

4. A description of the appropriateness of the performance metrics for the specific AI system;
Annex IV, point 5 AI Act

Annex IV — Technical documentation referred to in Article 11(1)
Point 5: A detailed description of the risk management system in accordance with Article 9;

5. A detailed description of the risk management system in accordance with Article 9;
Annex IV, point 6 AI Act

Annex IV — Technical documentation referred to in Article 11(1)
Point 6: A description of relevant changes made by the provider to the system through its lifecycle;

6. A description of relevant changes made by the provider to the system through its lifecycle;
Annex IV, point 7 AI Act

Annex IV — Technical documentation referred to in Article 11(1)
Point 7: A list of the harmonised standards applied in full or in part the references of which have been published in the Official Journal of the European Union; where no such harmonised standards have been applied, a detailed description of the solutions adopted to meet the requirements set out in Chapter III, Section 2, including a list of other relevant standards and technical specifications applied;

7. A list of the harmonised standards applied in full or in part the references of which have been published in the Official Journal of the European Union; where no such harmonised standards have been applied, a detailed description of the solutions adopted to meet the requirements set out in Chapter III, Section 2, including a list of other relevant standards and technical specifications applied;
Annex IV, point 8 AI Act

Annex IV — Technical documentation referred to in Article 11(1)
Point 8: A copy of the EU declaration of conformity referred to in Article 47;

8. A copy of the EU declaration of conformity referred to in Article 47;
Annex IV, point 9 AI Act

Annex IV — Technical documentation referred to in Article 11(1)
Point 9: A detailed description of the system in place to evaluate the AI system performance in the post-market phase in accordance with Article 72, including the post-market monitoring plan referred to in Article 72(3).

9. A detailed description of the system in place to evaluate the AI system performance in the post-market phase in accordance with Article 72, including the post-market monitoring plan referred to in Article 72(3).
Annex V, point 1 AI Act

Annex V — EU declaration of conformity
Point 1: AI system name and type and any additional unambiguous reference allowing the identification and traceability of the AI system;

1. AI system name and type and any additional unambiguous reference allowing the identification and traceability of the AI system;
Annex V, point 2 AI Act

Annex V — EU declaration of conformity
Point 2: The name and address of the provider or, where applicable, of their authorised representative;

2. The name and address of the provider or, where applicable, of their authorised representative;
Annex V, point 3 AI Act

Annex V — EU declaration of conformity
Point 3: A statement that the EU declaration of conformity referred to in Article 47 is issued under the sole responsibility of the provider;

3. A statement that the EU declaration of conformity referred to in Article 47 is issued under the sole responsibility of the provider;
Annex V, point 4 AI Act

Annex V — EU declaration of conformity
Point 4: A statement that the AI system is in conformity with this Regulation and, if applicable, with any other relevant Union law that provides for the issuing of the EU declaration of conformity referred to in Article 47;

4. A statement that the AI system is in conformity with this Regulation and, if applicable, with any other relevant Union law that provides for the issuing of the EU declaration of conformity referred to in Article 47;
Annex V, point 5 AI Act

Annex V — EU declaration of conformity
Point 5: Where an AI system involves the processing of personal data, a statement that that AI system complies with Regulations (EU) 2016/679 and (EU) 2018/1725 and Directive (EU) 2016/680;

5. Where an AI system involves the processing of personal data, a statement that that AI system complies with Regulations (EU) 2016/679 and (EU) 2018/1725 and Directive (EU) 2016/680;
Annex V, point 6 AI Act

Annex V — EU declaration of conformity
Point 6: References to any relevant harmonised standards used or any other common specification in relation to which conformity is declared;

6. References to any relevant harmonised standards used or any other common specification in relation to which conformity is declared;
Annex V, point 7 AI Act

Annex V — EU declaration of conformity
Point 7: Where applicable, the name and identification number of the notified body, a description of the conformity assessment procedure performed, and identification of the certificate issued;

7. Where applicable, the name and identification number of the notified body, a description of the conformity assessment procedure performed, and identification of the certificate issued;
Annex V, point 8 AI Act

Annex V — EU declaration of conformity
Point 8: The place and date of issue of the declaration, the name and function of the person who signed it, as well as an indication for, or on behalf of whom, that person signed, a signature.

8. The place and date of issue of the declaration, the name and function of the person who signed it, as well as an indication for, or on behalf of whom, that person signed, a signature.
Annex VI, conformity assessment procedure based on internal control AI Act

Annex VI — Conformity assessment procedure based on internal control
Conformity assessment procedure based on internal control

1. The conformity assessment procedure based on internal control is the conformity assessment procedure based on points 2, 3 and 4.2. The provider verifies that the established quality management system is in compliance with the requirements of Article 17.3. The provider examines the information contained in the technical documentation in order to assess the compliance of the AI system with the relevant essential requirements set out in Chapter III, Section 2.4. The provider also verifies that the design and development process of the AI system and its post-market monitoring as referred to in Article 72 is consistent with the technical documentation.
Annex VII, point 1 AI Act

Annex VII — Conformity based on an assessment of the quality management system and an assessment of the technical documentation
1. Introduction

Conformity based on an assessment of the quality management system and an assessment of the technical documentation is the conformity assessment procedure based on points 2 to 5.
Annex VII, point 2 AI Act

Annex VII — Conformity based on an assessment of the quality management system and an assessment of the technical documentation
2. Overview

The approved quality management system for the design, development and testing of AI systems pursuant to Article 17 shall be examined in accordance with point 3 and shall be subject to surveillance as specified in point 5. The technical documentation of the AI system shall be examined in accordance with point 4.
Annex VII, point 3 AI Act

Annex VII — Conformity based on an assessment of the quality management system and an assessment of the technical documentation
3. Quality management system

3.1. The application of the provider shall include:(a) the name and address of the provider and, if the application is lodged by an authorised representative, also their name and address;(b) the list of AI systems covered under the same quality management system;(c) the technical documentation for each AI system covered under the same quality management system;(d) the documentation concerning the quality management system which shall cover all the aspects listed under Article 17;(e) a description of the procedures in place to ensure that the quality management system remains adequate and effective;(f) a written declaration that the same application has not been lodged with any other notified body. 3.2. The quality management system shall be assessed by the notified body, which shall determine whether it satisfies the requirements referred to in Article 17.The decision shall be notified to the provider or its authorised representative.The notification shall contain the conclusions of the assessment of the quality management system and the reasoned assessment decision. 3.3. The quality management system as approved shall continue to be implemented and maintained by the provider so that it remains adequate and efficient. 3.4. Any intended change to the approved quality management system or the list of AI systems covered by the latter shall be brought to the attention of the notified body by the provider.The proposed changes shall be examined by the notified body, which shall decide whether the modified quality management system continues to satisfy the requirements referred to in point 3.2 or whether a reassessment is necessary.The notified body shall notify the provider of its decision. The notification shall contain the conclusions of the examination of the changes and the reasoned assessment decision.
Annex VII, point 5 AI Act

Annex VII — Conformity based on an assessment of the quality management system and an assessment of the technical documentation
5. Surveillance of the approved quality management system.

5.1. The purpose of the surveillance carried out by the notified body referred to in Point 3 is to make sure that the provider duly complies with the terms and conditions of the approved quality management system. 5.2. For assessment purposes, the provider shall allow the notified body to access the premises where the design, development, testing of the AI systems is taking place. The provider shall further share with the notified body all necessary information. 5.3. The notified body shall carry out periodic audits to make sure that the provider maintains and applies the quality management system and shall provide the provider with an audit report. In the context of those audits, the notified body may carry out additional tests of the AI systems for which a Union technical documentation assessment certificate was issued.
Annex VIII, section a — information to be submitted by providers of high-risk ai systems in accordance with article 49(1) AI Act

Annex VIII — Information to be submitted upon the registration of high-risk AI systems in accordance with Article 49
Section A — Information to be submitted by providers of high-risk AI systems in accordance with Article 49(1)

The following information shall be provided and thereafter kept up to date with regard to high-risk AI systems to be registered in accordance with Article 49(1): 1. The name, address and contact details of the provider;2. Where submission of information is carried out by another person on behalf of the provider, the name, address and contact details of that person;3. The name, address and contact details of the authorised representative, where applicable;4. The AI system trade name and any additional unambiguous reference allowing the identification and traceability of the AI system;5. A description of the intended purpose of the AI system and of the components and functions supported through this AI system;6. A basic and concise description of the information used by the system (data, inputs) and its operating logic;7. The status of the AI system (on the market, or in service; no longer placed on the market/in service, recalled);8. The type, number and expiry date of the certificate issued by the notified body and the name or identification number of that notified body, where applicable;9. A scanned copy of the certificate referred to in point 8, where applicable;10. Any Member States in which the AI system has been placed on the market, put into service or made available in the Union;11. A copy of the EU declaration of conformity referred to in Article 47;12. Electronic instructions for use; this information shall not be provided for high-risk AI systems in the areas of law enforcement or migration, asylum and border control management referred to in Annex III, points 1, 6 and 7;13. A URL for additional information (optional).
Annex VIII, section b — information to be submitted by providers of high-risk ai systems in accordance with article 49(2) AI Act

Annex VIII — Information to be submitted upon the registration of high-risk AI systems in accordance with Article 49
Section B — Information to be submitted by providers of high-risk AI systems in accordance with Article 49(2)

The following information shall be provided and thereafter kept up to date with regard to AI systems to be registered in accordance with Article 49(2): 1. The name, address and contact details of the provider;2. Where submission of information is carried out by another person on behalf of the provider, the name, address and contact details of that person;3. The name, address and contact details of the authorised representative, where applicable;4. The AI system trade name and any additional unambiguous reference allowing the identification and traceability of the AI system;5. A description of the intended purpose of the AI system;6. The condition or conditions under Article 6(3)based on which the AI system is considered to be not-high-risk;7. A short summary of the grounds on which the AI system is considered to be not-high-risk in application of the procedure under Article 6(3);8. The status of the AI system (on the market, or in service; no longer placed on the market/in service, recalled);9. Any Member States in which the AI system has been placed on the market, put into service or made available in the Union.