jeanflop/post_ocr_correction2 huggingface dataset:
at Geneva. Estonia: M. A. SCHMIDT, Director of Political Questions at the Foreign Office. Finland: His Excellency M. Rafael ERICH, Minister Plenipotentiary, Permanent Representative of Finland accredited to the League of Nations. France: M. Henri FROMAGEOT, Legal Adviser to the Ministry for Foreign Affairs. Substitute: M. le Comte CLAUZEL, Minister Plenipotentiary, Head of the French League of Nations Service. Greece: M. Vassili DENDRAMIS, Charge d'affaires at Bern, Permanent Representative of the Greek Republic accredited to the League of Nations. Substitute: M. Panayotis PIPINELLIS, Secretary at the Ministry for Foreign Affairs. Hungary: M. P. DE HEVESY, Resident Minister accredited to the League of Nations. India: Sir William Henry Hoare VINCENT, G.C.I.E., K.C.S.I., Member of the Council of the Secretary of State for India. Sir Edward Maynard DES CHAMPS CHAMIER, K.C.I.E., Legal Adviser to the Secretary of State. Irish Free State: M. Michael MACWHITE, Representative of the Irish Free State accredited to the League of Nations. Italy: His Excellency M. Vittorio SCIALOJA, Senator. Italian Representative on the Council of the League of Nations. Substitute: M. Massimo PILOTTI, Member of the Court of Appeal, attached to the Ministry for Foreign Affairs. Japan: M. Isaburo YOSHIDA, Counsellor of Embassy in London. Latvia: M. Charles DUZMANS (empêché), Permanent Representative of Latvia accredited to the League of Nations. M. Peter WELPS, Delegate ad audiendum. Liberia: His Excellency Baron Rodolphe LEHMANN, Envoy Extraordinary and Minister Plenipotentiary of Liberia accredited to His Excellency the President of the French Republic. Permanent Representative of Liberia accredited to the League of Nations. Delegate: M. N. OOMS, First Secretary of the Legation. Lithuania: His Excellency M. V. SIDZIKAUSKAS, Envoy Extraordinary and Minister Plenipotentiary accredited to the President of Germany. Luxembourg: M. Charles VERMAIRE, Consul at Geneva. Norway: M. le Dr Fredric CASTBERG, Counsellor in International Law at the Ministry for Foreign Affairs. New Zealand: The Right Honourable Sir Francis Henry Dillon BELL, G.C.M.G., K.C., Member of the Executive Council of New Zealand. The Honourable Sir Christopher James PARR, K.C.M.G., High Commissioner at London. Panama: His Excellency M. Guillermo ANDRADE, Former Minister of Panama in France and Colombia. His Excellency M. le Dr
DUZMANS (empêché), Permanent Representative of Latvia accredited to the League of Nations. M. Peter WELPS, Delegate ad audiendum. Liberia: His Excellency Baron Rodolphe LEHMANN, Envoy Extraordinary and Minister Plenipotentiary of Liberia accredited to His Excellency the President of the French Republic. Permanent Representative of Liberia accredited to the League of Nations. Delegate: M. N. OOMS, First Secretary of the Legation. Lithuania: His Excellency M. V. SIDZIKAUSKAS, Envoy Extraordinary and Minister Plenipotentiary accredited to the President of Germany. Luxembourg: M. Charles VERMAIRE, Consul at Geneva. Norway: M. le Dr Fredric CASTBERG, Counsellor in International Law at the Ministry for Foreign Affairs. New Zealand: The Right Honourable Sir Francis Henry Dillon BELL, G.C.M.G., K.C., Member of the Executive Council of New Zealand. The Honourable Sir Christopher James PARR, K.C.M.G., High Commissioner at London. Panama: His Excellency M. Guillermo ANDRADE, Former Minister of Panama in France and Colombia. His Excellency M. le Dr Eusebio A. MORALES, Minister of the Treasury. Netherlands: The Jonkheer W. J. M. VAN EYSINGA, Professor at the University of Leiden. Assisted by the baron F. M. VAN ASBECK, Professor at the Academy of Law of Batavia (Indies). Persia: His Highness Prince ARFA, First Delegate of Persia accredited to the League of Nations. Poland: M. le professor comte Michel ROSTWOROWSKI, Rector of the University of Jagiello at Cracow. M. Leon BABINSKI, Jurisconsult at the Ministry for Foreign Affairs. Substitute: M. le Dr Titus KOMARNICKI, Counsellor Ministerial. Portugal: His Excellency the Dr Auguste DE VASCONCELLOS, Minister Plenipotentiary. Romania: M. Demetre NEGULESCO, Judge at the Permanent Court of International Justice, Member of the Institut de droit international, professor at the University of Bucharest. Kingdom of Serbs, Croats and Slovenes: M. le Dr Lazare MARKOVITCH, Deputy, former Minister of Justice. Siam: His Excellency Prince CHAROON, Envoy Extraordinary and Minister Plenipotentiary accredited to His Excellency the President of the French Republic. Latvia: M. Charles DUZMANS (unable to attend). Permanent Latvian Representative accredited to the League of Nations. M. Peter WELPS, Delegate ad audiendum. Liberia: His Excellency Baron Rodolphe LEHMANN, Envoy Extraordinary and Minister Plenipotentiary accredited to His Excellency the President of the French Republic,
League of Nations. Poland: M. le professor comte Michel ROSTWOROWSKI, Rector of the University of Jagiello at Cracow. M. Leon BABINSKI, Jurisconsult at the Ministry for Foreign Affairs. Substitute: M. le Dr Titus KOMARNICKI, Counsellor Ministerial. Portugal: His Excellency the Dr Auguste DE VASCONCELLOS, Minister Plenipotentiary. Romania: M. Demetre NEGULESCO, Judge at the Permanent Court of International Justice, Member of the Institut de droit international, professor at the University of Bucharest. Kingdom of Serbs, Croats and Slovenes: M. le Dr Lazare MARKOVITCH, Deputy, former Minister of Justice. Siam: His Excellency Prince CHAROON, Envoy Extraordinary and Minister Plenipotentiary accredited to His Excellency the President of the French Republic. Latvia: M. Charles DUZMANS (unable to attend). Permanent Latvian Representative accredited to the League of Nations. M. Peter WELPS, Delegate ad audiendum. Liberia: His Excellency Baron Rodolphe LEHMANN, Envoy Extraordinary and Minister Plenipotentiary accredited to His Excellency the President of the French Republic, Permanent Representative accredited to the League of Nations. Substitute: M. N. OOMS, First Secretary of Legation. Lithuania: His Excellency M. V. SIDZIKAUSKAS, Envoy Extraordinary and Minister Plenipotentiary accredited to the President of the German Reich. Luxembourg: M. Charles VERMAIRE, Consul at Geneva. Norway: Dr. Frede CASTBERG, Adviser in International Law to the Ministry for Foreign Affairs. New Zealand: The Right Honourable Sir Francis Henry Dillon BELL, G.C.M.G., K.C., Member of the Executive Council of New Zealand. The Honourable Sir Christopher James PARR, K.C.M.G., High Commissioner in London. Panama: His Excellency M. Guillermo ANDRADE, Former Minister of Panama in France and Colombia. His Excellency Dr. Eusebio A. MORALES, Minister of the Treasury. Netherlands: Jonkheer W. J. M. VAN EYSINGA, Professor at the University of Leiden. Assisted by: Baron F. M. VAN ASBECK, Professor of the Academy of Law at Batavia (Dutch East Indies). Persia: His Highness Prince ARFA, First Delegate of Persia accredited to the League of Nations. Poland: Professor Count Michel ROSTWOROWSKI, Rector of the Jagellons University, Cracovia. M. Leon BABINSKI, Legal Adviser to the Ministry for Foreign Affairs. Substitute: Dr. Titus KOMARNICKI, Ministerial Counsellor. Portugal: His Excellency Dr. Auguste DE VASCONCELLOS, Minister Plenipotentiary. Roumania: M. Démètre NEGULESCO, Substitute Judge
to the Ministry for Foreign Affairs. New Zealand: The Right Honourable Sir Francis Henry Dillon BELL, G.C.M.G., K.C., Member of the Executive Council of New Zealand. The Honourable Sir Christopher James PARR, K.C.M.G., High Commissioner in London. Panama: His Excellency M. Guillermo ANDRADE, Former Minister of Panama in France and Colombia. His Excellency Dr. Eusebio A. MORALES, Minister of the Treasury. Netherlands: Jonkheer W. J. M. VAN EYSINGA, Professor at the University of Leiden. Assisted by: Baron F. M. VAN ASBECK, Professor of the Academy of Law at Batavia (Dutch East Indies). Persia: His Highness Prince ARFA, First Delegate of Persia accredited to the League of Nations. Poland: Professor Count Michel ROSTWOROWSKI, Rector of the Jagellons University, Cracovia. M. Leon BABINSKI, Legal Adviser to the Ministry for Foreign Affairs. Substitute: Dr. Titus KOMARNICKI, Ministerial Counsellor. Portugal: His Excellency Dr. Auguste DE VASCONCELLOS, Minister Plenipotentiary. Roumania: M. Démètre NEGULESCO, Substitute Judge of the Permanent Court of International Justice, Associate Member of the Institute of International Law, Professor at the University of Bucharest. Kingdom of the Serbs, Croats and Slovenes: Dr. Lazare MARKOVITCH, Deputy, former Minister of Justice. Siam: His Highness Prince CHAROON, Envoy Extraordinary and Minister Plenipotentiary accredited to His Excellency the President of the French Republic. Sweden: His Excellency Professor O. UNDEN, Former Minister for Foreign Affairs, Professor at the University of Upsala. Substitute: M. A. E. M. SJÔBORG, Envoy Extraordinary and Minister Plenipotentiary, Secretary-General of the Ministry for Foreign Affairs. Switzerland: M. Paul DINELHART, Minister Plenipotentiary, Chief of the Division of Foreign Affairs of the Federal Department of Political Affairs. Tchécoslovaquie: His Excellency M. OSUSKY, Envoy Extraordinary and Minister Plenipotentiary accredited to His Excellency the President of the French Republic, Delegate of Greece, Poland, Roumania, the Kingdom of the Serbs, Croates and Slovenes and of Tchécoslovaquie at the Commission for Reparations. Uruguay: His Excellency Dr. Enrique E. BUERO, Envoy Extraordinary and Minister Plenipotentiary accredited to the Federal Council of Switzerland. Venezuela: His Excellency M. Cesar ZUMETA, Envoy Extraordinary and Minister Plenipotentiary accredited to His Majesty the King of Italy. His Excellency M. Diogenes ESCALANTE, Envoy Extraordinary and Minister Plenipotentiary
the President of the French Republic. Sweden: His Excellency Professor O. UNDEN, Former Minister for Foreign Affairs, Professor at the University of Upsala. Substitute: M. A. E. M. SJÔBORG, Envoy Extraordinary and Minister Plenipotentiary, Secretary-General of the Ministry for Foreign Affairs. Switzerland: M. Paul DINELHART, Minister Plenipotentiary, Chief of the Division of Foreign Affairs of the Federal Department of Political Affairs. Tchécoslovaquie: His Excellency M. OSUSKY, Envoy Extraordinary and Minister Plenipotentiary accredited to His Excellency the President of the French Republic, Delegate of Greece, Poland, Roumania, the Kingdom of the Serbs, Croates and Slovenes and of Tchécoslovaquie at the Commission for Reparations. Uruguay: His Excellency Dr. Enrique E. BUERO, Envoy Extraordinary and Minister Plenipotentiary accredited to the Federal Council of Switzerland. Venezuela: His Excellency M. Cesar ZUMETA, Envoy Extraordinary and Minister Plenipotentiary accredited to His Majesty the King of Italy. His Excellency M. Diogenes ESCALANTE, Envoy Extraordinary and Minister Plenipotentiary accredited to His Majesty the King of England. His Excellency M. Caracciolo PARRA-PEREZ, Former plenipotentiary representative accredited to the Federal Council of Switzerland, Charge d'affaires at Berne. Le 9 septembre 1926, au cours de sa première séance, la Conférence a élu, pour président, le Jonkheer W. J. M. VAN EYSINGA, délégué des Pays-Bas et, pour vice-présidents, His Excellency M. César ZUMETA, délégué du Venezuela, et the very honorable Sir Francis Henry Dillon BELL, délégué de la Nouvelle-Zélande. 4. Dans une série de réunions, tenues du 9 au 23 septembre 1926, les délégués précités, tout en regrettant de n'avoir pu profiter de l'assistance d'un représentant des Etats-Unis, ont étudié les réserves et conditions des Etats-Unis, constamment inspirés du ferme désir de donner satisfaction, dans la plus large mesure possible, aux réserves des Etats-Unis. La Conférence a été unanime à rendre un cordial hommage à l'intention des Etats-Unis de collaborer au maintien de la Cour permanente de Justice internationale, collaboration qui était attendue avec confiance par les Etats adhérents au Statut de la Cour. Elle s'est pleinement rendu compte de l'effet moral que la participation des Etats-Unis à cette institution de paix et de justice aurait sur le développement du droit international
délégué des Pays-Bas et, pour vice-présidents, His Excellency M. César ZUMETA, délégué du Venezuela, et the very honorable Sir Francis Henry Dillon BELL, délégué de la Nouvelle-Zélande. 4. Dans une série de réunions, tenues du 9 au 23 septembre 1926, les délégués précités, tout en regrettant de n'avoir pu profiter de l'assistance d'un représentant des Etats-Unis, ont étudié les réserves et conditions des Etats-Unis, constamment inspirés du ferme désir de donner satisfaction, dans la plus large mesure possible, aux réserves des Etats-Unis. La Conférence a été unanime à rendre un cordial hommage à l'intention des Etats-Unis de collaborer au maintien de la Cour permanente de Justice internationale, collaboration qui était attendue avec confiance par les Etats adhérents au Statut de la Cour. Elle s'est pleinement rendu compte de l'effet moral que la participation des Etats-Unis à cette institution de paix et de justice aurait sur le développement du droit international et sur l'organisation progressive de la société mondiale sur les bases du respect du droit et de la solidarité des nations; elle s'est souvenue des précieuses contributions américaines aux progrès de la justice internationale au cours des xixe et xxe siècles, notamment, par l'intervention féconde des délégués des Etats-Unis aux deux Conférences de la Paix de La Haye et, plus récemment, par la part considérable prise par un éminent juriste américain à la préparation du Statut de la Cour. 5. La Conférence a reconnu que l'adhésion des Etats-Unis au Protocole de signature du 5 décembre 1920, dans des conditions spéciales, nécessite une entente entre les Etats-Unis et les signataires du Protocole. 6. La Conférence a formulé les conclusions ci-après, destinées à servir de base aux réponses à adresser à la lettre envoyée par le Secrétaire d'Etat des Etats-Unis à chacun des gouvernements signataires du Protocole du 16 décembre 1920, réponses dans lesquelles les Etats signataires s'exprimeraient sur l'acceptation des réserves et conditions des Etats-Unis: Réserve I. Il y a lieu d'accepter que l'adhésion des Etats-Unis, au Protocole du 16 décembre 1920 et au Statut y annexé de la Cour permanente de Justice internationale ne soit pas considérée comme impliquant pour
deux Conférences de la Paix de La Haye et, plus récemment, par la part considérable prise par un éminent juriste américain à la préparation du Statut de la Cour. 5. La Conférence a reconnu que l'adhésion des Etats-Unis au Protocole de signature du 5 décembre 1920, dans des conditions spéciales, nécessite une entente entre les Etats-Unis et les signataires du Protocole. 6. La Conférence a formulé les conclusions ci-après, destinées à servir de base aux réponses à adresser à la lettre envoyée par le Secrétaire d'Etat des Etats-Unis à chacun des gouvernements signataires du Protocole du 16 décembre 1920, réponses dans lesquelles les Etats signataires s'exprimeraient sur l'acceptation des réserves et conditions des Etats-Unis: Réserve I. Il y a lieu d'accepter que l'adhésion des Etats-Unis, au Protocole du 16 décembre 1920 et au Statut y annexé de la Cour permanente de Justice internationale ne soit pas considérée comme impliquant pour les Etats-Unis une relation juridique quelconque avec la Société des Nations ou l'acceptation de leur part d'aucune obligation découlant du Traité de paix de Versailles du 28 juin 1919. Réserve II. Il y a lieu d'accepter que les Etats-Unis puissent participer par l'intermédiaire de représentants désignés à cet effet et sur un pied d'égalité avec les autres Etats, Membres de la Société des Nations. Paul DINICHERT, Minister Plenipotentiary, Head of the Division for Foreign Affairs in the Federal Political Department. Czechoslovakia : His Excellency M. OSUSKY, Envoy Extraordinary and Minister Plenipotentiary accredited to His Excellency the President of the French Republic, Delegate of Greece, Poland, Romania, the Kingdom of the Serbs, Croats and Slovenes, and Czechoslovakia at the Reparation Commission. Uruguay: His Excellency Dr. Enrique E. BUERO, Envoy Extraordinary and Minister Plenipotentiary accredited to the Swiss Federal Council. Venezuela: His Excellency M. César ZUMETA, Envoy Extraordinary and Minister Plenipotentiary accredited to His Majesty the King of Italy. His Excellency M. Diogenes ESCALANTE, Envoy Extraordinary and Minister Plenipotentiary to His Britannic Majesty. His Excellency M. Caracciolo PARRA-PEREZ, Former Special Plenipotentiary accredited to the Swiss Federal Council, Chargé d’Affaires at Berne. In the course of its first meeting on September 1st, 1926,
sur un pied d'égalité avec les autres Etats, Membres de la Société des Nations. Paul DINICHERT, Minister Plenipotentiary, Head of the Division for Foreign Affairs in the Federal Political Department. Czechoslovakia : His Excellency M. OSUSKY, Envoy Extraordinary and Minister Plenipotentiary accredited to His Excellency the President of the French Republic, Delegate of Greece, Poland, Romania, the Kingdom of the Serbs, Croats and Slovenes, and Czechoslovakia at the Reparation Commission. Uruguay: His Excellency Dr. Enrique E. BUERO, Envoy Extraordinary and Minister Plenipotentiary accredited to the Swiss Federal Council. Venezuela: His Excellency M. César ZUMETA, Envoy Extraordinary and Minister Plenipotentiary accredited to His Majesty the King of Italy. His Excellency M. Diogenes ESCALANTE, Envoy Extraordinary and Minister Plenipotentiary to His Britannic Majesty. His Excellency M. Caracciolo PARRA-PEREZ, Former Special Plenipotentiary accredited to the Swiss Federal Council, Chargé d’Affaires at Berne. In the course of its first meeting on September 1st, 1926, the Conference elected as President, Jonkheer W. J. M. VAN EYSINGA, delegate of the Netherlands, and as Vice-Presidents, His Excellency M. Cesar ZUMETA, delegate of Venezuela, and the Right Honourable Sir Francis Henry Dillon BELL, delegate of New Zealand. In the course of its sessions, continued from September 1st, 1926, to September 23rd, 1926, the delegates named above, while regretting that they have not had the assistance of a representative of the Government of the United States, have studied the reservations and conditions of the United States with a strong desire to satisfy them in the largest possible measure. The Conference has unanimously welcomed the proposal of the United States to collaborate in the maintenance of the Permanent Court of International Justice; such collaboration has been awaited with confidence by the States which have accepted the Statute of the Court. The Conference has taken full account of the great moral effect which the participation of the United States in the maintenance of this institution of peace and justice would have on the development of international law and on the progressive organization of world society on the basis of a respect for law and the solidarity of nations. No has it
to September 23rd, 1926, the delegates named above, while regretting that they have not had the assistance of a representative of the Government of the United States, have studied the reservations and conditions of the United States with a strong desire to satisfy them in the largest possible measure. The Conference has unanimously welcomed the proposal of the United States to collaborate in the maintenance of the Permanent Court of International Justice; such collaboration has been awaited with confidence by the States which have accepted the Statute of the Court. The Conference has taken full account of the great moral effect which the participation of the United States in the maintenance of this institution of peace and justice would have on the development of international law and on the progressive organization of world society on the basis of a respect for law and the solidarity of nations. No has it been unmindful of the valuable American contributions to the progress of international justice in the course of the 19th and 20th centuries, notably in the fruitful participation of the delegates of the United States in the two Hague Peace Conferences and more recently in the large part taken by an eminent American jurist in the preparation of the Statute of the Court. The Conference has recognized that adherence to the Protocol of Signature of December 16th, 1920, by the United States under special conditions necessitates an agreement between the United States and the signatories of the Protocol. The Conference has formulated the following conclusions as the basis of the replies to the letter addressed by the Secretary of State of the United States to each of the States signatories of the Protocol of December 16th, 1920, by which the signatory States would declare their views as to the acceptance of the reservations and conditions proposed by the United States: Reservation I. It may be agreed that the adherence of the United States to the Protocol of December 16th, 1920, and the Statute of the Permanent Court of International Justice annexed thereto shall not be taken to involve any legal relation
eminent American jurist in the preparation of the Statute of the Court. The Conference has recognized that adherence to the Protocol of Signature of December 16th, 1920, by the United States under special conditions necessitates an agreement between the United States and the signatories of the Protocol. The Conference has formulated the following conclusions as the basis of the replies to the letter addressed by the Secretary of State of the United States to each of the States signatories of the Protocol of December 16th, 1920, by which the signatory States would declare their views as to the acceptance of the reservations and conditions proposed by the United States: Reservation I. It may be agreed that the adherence of the United States to the Protocol of December 16th, 1920, and the Statute of the Permanent Court of International Justice annexed thereto shall not be taken to involve any legal relation on the part of the United States to the League of Nations or the assumption of any obligations by the United States under the Treaty of Peace of Versailles of June 28th, 1919. Reservation II. It may be agreed that the United States may participate, through representatives designated for the purpose and upon an equality with the other States, Members of the Société des Nations, représentés, soit au Conseil, soit à l’Assemblée, à toutes délibérations du Conseil ou de l’Assemblée, pour élire des juges ou des juges suppléants de la Cour permanente de Justice internationale ainsi que pour pourvoir à des vacances. Réserve III. Il y a lieu d’accepter que les États-Unis contribuent aux dépenses de la Cour pour une part équitable que le Congrès des États-Unis déterminera et inscrira au budget. Réserve IV. A. Il y a lieu d’accepter que les États-Unis puissent en tout temps retirer leur adhésion audit Protocole du 16 décembre 1920. En vue d’assurer l’égalité de traitement, il paraît naturel de prévoir pour les États signataires, agissant d’accord et, au moins, à la majorité des deux tiers, le droit de retirer de même leur acceptation des conditions spéciales mises par les États-Unis à leur adhésion