translate English to French: The court suggested that the damages the plaintiffs claimed (with the exception of damages for attorney fees) might qualify for recovery under CISG Article 74, but that under CISG Article 6 “Plaintiffs and Defendant were free to agree to liquidate damages in the event of a breach of contract.” The court noted in a footnote that recovery of attorney fees as damages under Article 74 had been denied in several U.S. decisions.
Le tribunal a suggéré que les dommages dont les demandeurs demandaient réparation (hormis les frais de justice) pourraient donner lieu à une indemnisation en vertu de l'article 74 de la CVIM mais qu'aux termes de son article 6, “les demandeurs et le défendeur étaient libres de convenir du montant des dommages-intérêts à verser en cas de contravention au contrat”.