translate English to French: The Court of First Instance further considered that the Commission could not, without making an error, rely on the fact that there was no market transparency and no evidence that retaliatory measures had been used in the past to conclude that the concentration was not likely to give rise to the creation of a collective dominant position.
Le Tribunal relève en outre que la Commission s’est fondée sur l’absence de preuve de l’exercice de mesures de rétorsion dans le passé, alors que, selon la jurisprudence, la simple existence de mécanismes de dissuasion efficaces suffit. En effet, si les sociétés se conforment à la politique commune, il n’y a pas lieu de recourir à l’exercice de sanctions.