translate English to French: Specifically, the proprietor argued that the applicant had invoked the Community trade mark for the purposes of subparagraph (e), but not for the purposes of subparagraph (b). By using said trade mark as proof of prior disclosure and annulling the Community design on that ground and not on the ground of subparagraph (e), it went beyond its remit.
En premier lieu, la chambre a, à son tour, considéré que les divers documents présentés par le demandeur manquaient de clarté et a invité ce dernier à produire les originaux, ce qu’il a fait.