translate English to French: In the case of Staroszczlyk, one judge disagreed with the majority that there has been a breach of Article 6 §1 of the Convention in this case as he did not think it was fair or necessary to require from a legal aid lawyer to formulate his opinion in writing so long as such a requirement did not exist under the domestic law in respect of the other lawyers to whom any individual might have had recourse on payment for lodging a cassation appeal.
Décision de la Cour Article 5 § 3 La Cour estime que la détention du requérant n’était pas motivée par des raisons pertinentes et suffisantes, les juridictions internes s’étant bornées, dans leurs décisions, à paraphraser le Code de procédure pénale, sans autre explication. Article 5 § 4 La Cour observe que la cloison en verre dans le parloir ne comportait pas d’ouverture – bien que M. Castravet ne fût pas dangereux – ce qui a rendu difficile l’échange de documents.