translate English to French: The review tribunal appears to have based its decision on the theory that people on jury duty, at committee meetings, and attending court as witnesses would have suffered the same loss as Mr. Cramm and other people absent from work due to disability, if they were absent for more than one hundred days in a calendar year.
Le tribunal d’appel a jugé que le Régime de garantie d’emploi et de revenu n’établissait pas une distinction préjudiciable aux employés sur la base de la déficience et, par conséquent, que la Commission n’avait pas réussi à établir une preuve prima facie de discrimination.