translate English to French: By its third ground of appeal, the appellant criticises the Court of First Instance for having failed to examine the facts and evidence submitted to demonstrate the inherent distinctiveness of the contested marks, thus infringing its right to be heard contrary to the second paragraph of Article 6 EU, read with Article 6 of the European Convention on the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, and the first indent of paragraph 2 of Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.
Sur le troisième moyen du pourvoi: violation du droit d'être entendu 53.