translate English to French:  5. It is not contrary to Community law for a national limitation period for claims for repayment of duties levied in breach of Article 95 of the Treaty or of a provision similar to Article 18 of the free-trade agreement concluded between the European Economic Community and the Kingdom of Sweden to run from an earlier point in time than that from which the duties were discontinued.‘ Advocate General F.G. Jacobs delivered his Opinion at the sitting of the Sixth Chamber on 27 February 1997. He proposed that the Court should reply as follows: '1.
 5) Le droit communautaire ne s'oppose pas à ce que le délai de prescription national applicable à une demande de remboursement de taxes perçues en violation de l'article 95 du traité ou d'une disposition analogue à l'article 18 de l'accord conclu entre la Communauté économique européenne et le royaume de Suède commence à courir à une date antérieure à celle à laquelle ces taxes ont été supprimées.»