Claim: More specifically, around 95% of active climate researchers actively publishing climate papers endorse the consensus position.

Relevance (1 = gold evidence, 0 = mined hard negative): 1
Passage: Nearly all publishing climate scientists (97–98%) support the consensus on anthropogenic climate change, and the remaining 3% of contrarian studies either cannot be replicated or contain errors.

Relevance (1 = gold evidence, 0 = mined hard negative): 1
Passage: 76 out of 79 climatologists who "listed climate science as their area of expertise and who also have published more than 50% of their recent peer-reviewed papers on the subject of climate change" believed that mean global temperatures had risen compared to pre-1800s levels.

Relevance (1 = gold evidence, 0 = mined hard negative): 1
Passage: A 2010 paper in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States (PNAS) reviewed publication and citation data for 1,372 climate researchers and drew the following two conclusions: (i) 97–98% of the climate researchers most actively publishing in the field support the tenets of ACC (Anthropogenic Climate Change) outlined by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, and (ii) the relative climate expertise and scientific prominence of the researchers unconvinced of ACC are substantially below that of the convinced researchers.

Relevance (1 = gold evidence, 0 = mined hard negative): 1
Passage: Over 99.99% of climate scientists did not reject AGW in their peer-reviewed research.

Relevance (1 = gold evidence, 0 = mined hard negative): 1
Passage: (i) 97–98% of the climate researchers most actively publishing in the field support the tenets of ACC (Anthropogenic Climate Change) outlined by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, and (ii) the relative climate expertise and scientific prominence of the researchers unconvinced of ACC are substantially below that of the convinced researchers.

Relevance (1 = gold evidence, 0 = mined hard negative): 0
Passage: A scientific consensus on climate change exists, as recognized by national academies of science and other authoritative bodies.

Relevance (1 = gold evidence, 0 = mined hard negative): 0
Passage: The scientific consensus on climate change is "that climate is changing and that these changes are in large part caused by human activities", and it "is largely irreversible".

Relevance (1 = gold evidence, 0 = mined hard negative): 0
Passage: The level of consensus correlates with expertise in climate science.

Relevance (1 = gold evidence, 0 = mined hard negative): 0
Passage: There is widespread support for the IPCC in the scientific community, which is reflected in publications by other scientific bodies and experts.

Relevance (1 = gold evidence, 0 = mined hard negative): 0
Passage: A number of scientific organizations have issued statements that support the consensus view.

Relevance (1 = gold evidence, 0 = mined hard negative): 0
Passage: A 2016 paper (which was co-authored by Naomi Oreskes, Peter Doran, William Anderegg, Bart Verheggen, Ed Maibach, J. Stuart Carlton and John Cook, and which was based on a half a dozen independent studies by the authors) concluded that ``the finding of 97 % consensus [that humans are causing recent global warming] in published climate research is robust and consistent with other surveys of climate scientists and peer-reviewed studies.''

Relevance (1 = gold evidence, 0 = mined hard negative): 0
Passage: The IPCC's attribution of recent global warming to human activities is a view shared by the scientific community, and is also supported by 196 other scientific organizations worldwide (see also: Scientific consensus on climate change).

Relevance (1 = gold evidence, 0 = mined hard negative): 0
Passage: "Climate Scientists Virtually Unanimous Anthropogenic Global Warming Is True".