Claim: “Healthy societies do not fall apart over slow, widely predicted, relatively small economic adjustments of the sort painted by climate analysis.

Relevance (1 = gold evidence, 0 = mined hard negative): 1
Passage: The Stern Review notes that the prediction that, "Under business as usual, global emissions will be sufficient to propel greenhouse gas concentrations to over 550 ppm CO 2 by 2050 and over 650–700 ppm by the end of this century is robust to a wide range of changes in model assumptions."

Relevance (1 = gold evidence, 0 = mined hard negative): 1
Passage: GHG emissions due to anthropogenic (human) activity are the dominant cause of observed global warming (climate change) since the mid-20th century.

Relevance (1 = gold evidence, 0 = mined hard negative): 1
Passage: Estimates from the International Labour Organization’s Global Economic Linkages model suggest that unmitigated climate change, with associated negative impacts on enterprises and workers, will have negative effects on output in many industries, with drops in output of 2.4% by 2030 and 7.2% by 2050.

Relevance (1 = gold evidence, 0 = mined hard negative): 1
Passage: In 2019, 2 weeks before the elections to the European Parlament, the World Wide Fund for Nature stated that the European Union is unsustainable in his current mode of life and economy and asked him to fix it by "Shift to sustainable consumption and food systems, make Europe climate-neutral by 2040, restore our Nature, protect the Ocean, invest in a sustainable future" At a March 2009 meeting of the Copenhagen Climate Council, 2,500 climate experts from 80 countries issued a keynote statement that there is now "no excuse" for failing to act on global warming and that without strong carbon reduction "abrupt or irreversible" shifts in climate may occur that "will be very difficult for contemporary societies to cope with".

Relevance (1 = gold evidence, 0 = mined hard negative): 1
Passage: Several key areas have been targeted for economic analysis and reform: the environmental effects of unconstrained economic growth; the consequences of nature being treated as an economic externality; and the possibility of an economics that takes greater account of the social and environmental consequences of market behavior.

Relevance (1 = gold evidence, 0 = mined hard negative): 0
Passage: While the limitations of economics and social welfare analysis, including cost–benefit analysis, are widely documented, economics nevertheless provides useful tools for assessing the pros and cons of taking, or not taking, action on climate change mitigation, as well as of adaptation measures, in achieving competing societal goals.

Relevance (1 = gold evidence, 0 = mined hard negative): 0
Passage: This article is about climate change, industry and society.

Relevance (1 = gold evidence, 0 = mined hard negative): 0
Passage: Healthy ecosystems provide important ecosystem services that can contribute to climate change adaptation.

Relevance (1 = gold evidence, 0 = mined hard negative): 0
Passage: Climate change is a prevalent issue in society.

Relevance (1 = gold evidence, 0 = mined hard negative): 0
Passage: The probability of abrupt change for some climate related feedbacks may be low.

Relevance (1 = gold evidence, 0 = mined hard negative): 0
Passage: In some natural systems, human intervention may facilitate adjustment to expected climate and its effects'.

Relevance (1 = gold evidence, 0 = mined hard negative): 0
Passage: Climate has been fairly stable over the Holocene.

Relevance (1 = gold evidence, 0 = mined hard negative): 0
Passage: Climate Change: Vital Signs of the Planet prevent dangerous anthropogenic climate change.