Claim: Though CRU neglected to provide an exact list of temperature stations, it could not have hid or tampered with data.

Relevance (1 = gold evidence, 0 = mined hard negative): 1
Passage: The MPs had seen no evidence to support claims that Jones had tampered with data or interfered with the peer-review process.

Relevance (1 = gold evidence, 0 = mined hard negative): 1
Passage: The Climatic Research Unit developed its gridded CRUTEM data set of land air temperature anomalies from instrumental temperature records held by National Meteorological Organisations around the world, often under formal or informal confidentiality agreements that restricted use of this raw data to academic purposes, and prevented it from being passed onto third parties.

Relevance (1 = gold evidence, 0 = mined hard negative): 1
Passage: On 27 July 2011 CRU announced that the raw instrumental data not already in the public domain had been released and was available for download, with the exception of Poland which was outside the area covered by the FOIA request.

Relevance (1 = gold evidence, 0 = mined hard negative): 1
Passage: The difference between data analysis and data mining is that data analysis is used to test models and hypotheses on the dataset, e.g., analyzing the effectiveness of a marketing campaign, regardless of the amount of data; in contrast, data mining uses machine learning and statistical models to uncover clandestine or hidden patterns in a large volume of data.

Relevance (1 = gold evidence, 0 = mined hard negative): 1
Passage: DPA has two main objectives: To use data to provide knowledge in the most efficient manner possible (minimize noise, complexity, and unnecessary data or detail given each audience's needs and roles) To use data to provide knowledge in the most effective manner possible (provide relevant, timely and complete data to each audience member in a clear and understandable manner that conveys important meaning, is actionable and can affect understanding, behavior and decisions) With the above objectives in mind, the actual work of data presentation architecture consists of: Creating effective delivery mechanisms for each audience member depending on their role, tasks, locations and access to technology Defining important meaning (relevant knowledge) that is needed by each audience member in each context Determining the required periodicity of data updates (the currency of the data) Determining the right timing for data presentation (when and how often the user needs to see the data) Finding the right data (subject area, historical reach, breadth, level of detail, etc.)

Relevance (1 = gold evidence, 0 = mined hard negative): 0
Passage: The Climatic Research Unit email controversy (also known as ``Climategate'') began in November 2009 with the hacking of a server at the Climatic Research Unit (CRU) at the University of East Anglia (UEA) by an external attacker, copying thousands of emails and computer files, the Climatic Research Unit documents, to various internet locations several weeks before the Copenhagen Summit on climate change.

Relevance (1 = gold evidence, 0 = mined hard negative): 0
Passage: The Climatic Research Unit email controversy (also known as "Climategate") began in November 2009 with the hacking of a server at the Climatic Research Unit (CRU) at the University of East Anglia (UEA) by an external attacker, copying thousands of emails and computer files, the Climatic Research Unit documents, to various internet locations several weeks before the Copenhagen Summit on climate change.

Relevance (1 = gold evidence, 0 = mined hard negative): 0
Passage: It said that "even if the data that CRU used were not publicly available—which they mostly are—or the methods not published—which they have been—its published results would still be credible: the results from CRU agree with those drawn from other international data sets; in other words, the analyses have been repeated and the conclusions have been verified.

Relevance (1 = gold evidence, 0 = mined hard negative): 0
Passage: In 2011, a new analysis of temperature data by the independent Berkeley Earth Surface Temperature group, many of whom had stated publicly that they thought it was possible that the CRU had manipulated data, concluded that "these studies were done carefully and that potential biases identified by climate change sceptics did not seriously affect their conclusions".

Relevance (1 = gold evidence, 0 = mined hard negative): 0
Passage: Data in "An Inconvenient Truth" have been questioned.

Relevance (1 = gold evidence, 0 = mined hard negative): 0
Passage: Category : Hospitals with year of establishment missing

Relevance (1 = gold evidence, 0 = mined hard negative): 0
Passage: The custodians of the raw data are the that originated the data; CRU retains most but not all of the raw data, which continues to be held by the originating services.

Relevance (1 = gold evidence, 0 = mined hard negative): 0
Passage: Category : Educational institutions with year of establishment missing