Claim: CO2 limits won't cool the planet

Relevance (1 = gold evidence, 0 = mined hard negative): 1
Passage: Less energy reaches the upper atmosphere, which is therefore cooler because of this absorption.

Relevance (1 = gold evidence, 0 = mined hard negative): 1
Passage: Occupational CO 2 exposure limits have been set in the United States at 0.5% (5000 ppm) for an eight-hour period.

Relevance (1 = gold evidence, 0 = mined hard negative): 1
Passage: As the temperature rises closer to the value the white daisies like, the white daisies outreproduce the black daisies, leading to a larger percentage of white surface, and more sunlight is reflected, reducing the heat input and eventually cooling the planet.

Relevance (1 = gold evidence, 0 = mined hard negative): 1
Passage: If cloud cover increases, more sunlight will be reflected back into space, cooling the planet.

Relevance (1 = gold evidence, 0 = mined hard negative): 1
Passage: Globally, these effects are estimated to have led to a slight cooling, dominated by an increase in surface albedo.

Relevance (1 = gold evidence, 0 = mined hard negative): 0
Passage: Rennie 2009: "Claim 1: Anthropogenic CO2 can't be changing climate, because CO2 is only a trace gas in the atmosphere and the amount produced by humans is dwarfed by the amount from volcanoes and other natural sources.

Relevance (1 = gold evidence, 0 = mined hard negative): 0
Passage: Some climate change denial groups say that because CO 2 is only a trace gas in the atmosphere (roughly 400ppm, or 0.04%, 4 parts per 10,000) it can only have a minor effect on the climate.

Relevance (1 = gold evidence, 0 = mined hard negative): 0
Passage: It should in principle, however the atmosphere is very complicated and one cannot simply argue that just because CO is a greenhouse gas it causes warming.

Relevance (1 = gold evidence, 0 = mined hard negative): 0
Passage: Although the parties to the UNFCCC have agreed that deep cuts in emissions are required and that global warming should be limited to well below 2 °C (3.6 °F) in the Paris Agreement of 2016, the Earth's average surface temperature has already increased by about half this threshold and current pledges by countries to cut emissions are inadequate to limit future warming.

Relevance (1 = gold evidence, 0 = mined hard negative): 0
Passage: Analysis of carbon isotopes in atmospheric CO 2 shows that the recent observed CO 2 increase cannot have come from the oceans, volcanoes, or the biosphere, and thus is not a response to rising temperatures as would be required if the same processes creating past lags were active now.

Relevance (1 = gold evidence, 0 = mined hard negative): 0
Passage: Even if human carbon dioxide emissions were to completely cease, atmospheric temperatures are not expected to decrease significantly for thousands of years.

Relevance (1 = gold evidence, 0 = mined hard negative): 0
Passage: IPCC says, "All pathways that limit global warming to 1.5°C [2.7°F] with limited or no overshoot project the use of carbon dioxide removal (CDR) on the order of 100-1000 GtCO over the 21st century.

Relevance (1 = gold evidence, 0 = mined hard negative): 0
Passage: Limiting global warming to 1.5°C requires staying within a total carbon budget, i.e.