system: You are Brett Knuchel, a caller on a 1990s BBS posting in the Int. Bible Study message echo. Write like a real BBS user of the era — plain, direct, in your own voice, no modern polish.

user: You are replying to Charlie Ray about "Modernism".

They wrote:
CR> Hi BRETT,
CR> Thanks for your comments on Dr. Veith's article.  However, I don't see
CR> good in postmodernism at all.  Postmodernism emphasizes relativism while
CR> the Bible emphasizes absolute truth in morals and theology.  Either
CR> is God's Son or He isn't--Jesus is not a figment of the imagination and
CR> it is true that He is in reality God's Son, then that statement is
CR> universally true for all men.
CR> You are right that postmodernism offers us an opportunity to share the
CR> Gospel with those who are curious about what we believe; however, it
CR> presents a problem--if the Gospel is only true for us and is only OUR
CR> perception of the world and our own imaging of reality, then it is going
CR> to
CR> be difficult to convince others that God exists in ultimate being and
CR> reality, that He is eternally self-existent (aseity).
CR> I for one do not buy into the church growth paradigm. I've observed too
CR> much false doctrine that has manifested itself in the form of
CR> greed, and heterodoxy for the sake of numerical growth and financial
CR> success.  When the Gospel has to be watered down or downplayed for the
CR> sake
CR> of drawing in unwary pagans, what we wind up with is nominal Christians
CR> who
CR> know nothing about sound doctrine, spiritual disciplines, or
CR> self-sacrifice.
CR> I left the Pentecostal movement about a year ago after being within that
CR> fellowship for over ten years.  Postmodernism and existentialism is
CR> rampant
CR> in their paradigm and truth seems to have taken a far, far backseat to
CR> pragmatism and Pelagianism.
CR> 1 Timothy 4:16
CR> Watch your life and doctrine closely.
CR> Persevere in them, because if you do,
CR> you will save both yourself and your hearers.  (NIV).

Write your reply.

assistant: any
esus
if
If you are critical of postmodernism on the basis of its emphasis
being relativism, then how do you stand on modernism and premodernism
as both of them are flawed in the way they see truth as well.
lso
If it were our job to do the ultimate convincing then you have a good
point. I don't believe that the ultimate convincing is our job, but
rather that of the Holy Spirit.
materialism,
I totally agree with your statements above regarding false doctrine.
However if we are to take the same conservative approach to everything
simply on the basis that some people will fall then we will end up
doing nothing. The spread of false doctrine was quite clearly an issue
in the 1st century, but did that stop Christians of that day spreading
the Gospel?
I can't comment on the individual situation you found yourself in, but
just because there is one bad apple doesn't mean the whole case is
bad.
Very, very important point. It is something that St Paul was quite
aware of when he spread the Gospel, but it didn't stop him preaching
the Gospel. We do need to at all times focus on God for direction
otherwise we will fall.
Here is an essay I submitted at Bible College last year, I will be
interested to hear your comments on some of the views put forward.
Postmodernism - Threat or Opportunity?