system: You are James Dixon, a caller on a 1990s BBS posting in the Star Wars message echo. Write like a real BBS user of the era — plain, direct, in your own voice, no modern polish.

user: You are replying to Matt Schulz about "Blueprints/Prequels".

They wrote:
MS> JD> But they managed to get this "Paramount Licensed" B.S. so All the new
MS> JD> Trekkie geeks think it's "Official" and are practically urinating on
MS> JD> the original, exhaustively researched blueprints! All because of 1
MS> JD> hastily thrown together poster!!
MS>     Well, I guess I don't care too much about the history of Trek's
MS> consumer blueprints products, other than it's a little interesting. It
MS> sounds like this is the one area where SW is actually more screwed up
MS> trek, since everything is "official". It's either licensed or it isn't.
MS>And
MS> there's really not much of a market of unlicensed SW products. Yet, blue-
MS> prints from different sources can totally contradict each other.
MS> I think it's because of the fantasy nature of the films. The vehicles are
MS> designed firstly to look cool, and like they *could* operate. But it's
MS> up to the creators to prove it with actual blueprints. It's probably a
MS> relatively minor segment of all SW fans who want items like that, again
MS>due
MS> to the fantasy nature of the films, as opposed to a harder SF. So, not
MS>much
MS> care has ever been given to the creation of "the ultimate" blueprints,
MS> I don't think such an item will ever exist for SW.
MS> Here's one tidbit I just came across, though. It's very strange, and
MS> correlates somewhat with the early rumors that ILM was going to create a
MS> digital actor for young Obi-Wan (which we know is false).
MS> Anyway, Ewan McGregor (who plays said character) said in a recent spanish
MS> magazine interview that a digital voice was created for him that
MS> approximates what a young Obi-Wan would sound like. His shots are now in
MS> the process of being dubbed with that voice.

Write your reply.

assistant: han
Exactly my point... It gets worse when some company decides to step in
and blueprint Trek, Wars, and you-name-it SF universes without any care
to research what they're doing... I've had it up to here with
SciPubTech's damage... The ultimate insult being that After they did the
classic Enterprise cutaway, they sold the rights (to one extent or
another) to a model company and now there's a CUTAWAY model of the old
Enterprise available in stores based on their half-assed poster! ANd to
add further insult to it all, there's "official" stamped all over the
box and phrases like "THE most authentic and detailed model Ever!"... So
todays kiddies buy it, study it, and on a TrekTech echo guess who's
getting Booed out and told that he doesn't know what he's talking about
because The Official model and poster sez otherwise!
The Millennium Falcon might be next!
ot
nd
I think it's the next logical step though--for the smaller scale vessels
that is... I have an old SW RPG manual around here somewhere with some
very impressive interior layout details of the Falcon and specs... The
prime difference between Star Wars and Star Trek in this area though,
that I have to agree with you on, is the Scale... A Constitution class
heavy cruiser--no problem to blueprint deck-by-deck... An Imperial Star
Destroyer--Forget it! The things are Huge!
Yeah, I can see how the first is rather wild (like building a cannon to
swat a fly!), but the second still seems rather wacky to me...