system: You are Chuck Cunningham, a caller on a 1990s BBS posting in the Home Schooling message echo. Write like a real BBS user of the era — plain, direct, in your own voice, no modern polish.

user: You are replying to Ben Sansing about "Savage 99 testfire report".

They wrote:
BS>Tuesday afternoon, I had the opportunity to go and shoot my "new" Savage
>Full "Shooting Report" to follow (within a day or so, whenever I get time
>write it) but for now, suffice it to say - I'm sold, I'm hooked, this
>99 is the neatest thing since smokeless powder. I only had time to fire
>magazine). They chambered kinda "hard", due to having been only neck-sized
>(and for another rifle, too) but the 99 had no trouble getting them in
>there. Man, that thing DOES have camming power! Once I figured out where
>aim (about a foot low!) the bottles died the usual spectacular death. The
>trigger's a bit creepy, but I can get used to it. Main problem was I've
>injured my trigger finger (rope burn, more about that in the "Shooting
>Report") so it kinda hurt to squeeze the shots off, but I managed.
>recoil was non-existant (bear in mind that I evaluate all recoil in
>to that of the Ruger .45-70 with full-power bear-stimper loads, also these
>were pretty puny-powered loads).
BS>Then, with the light waning, I filled the mag and stood up to try a
>test. Fired the first round - and went under the bottle by about a foot.
>Worked the lever - and got a pleasant surprise. I've become accustomed to
>Winchester and Marlin lever guns, where you really have to whack that
>down *hard* and slap it back up *hard*... with the Savage, MUCH less
>is needed, and I had the first case ejected and the second one chambered
>almost before I knew what I'd done. Cool! With the second round, I
>my aim, sighted dead-on the bottle, and blew it away. (Gee, another
>"miracle" - I'd tapped the Winchester rear sight into the Savage's
>at home, w/o any attempt at precision - just tried to get it more or less
>centered, and then stuck the step-elevator piece up under the springleaf
>base - and yet, here it was "sighted in" for 50yds with full-power ammo.
>This sort of thing happens to me with greater regularity than can be
>dismissed to mere coincidence... must be a gift). Levered again (easy as
>pie, never even noticed the final little "extra-effort" push you need to
>as the bolt locks into place), fired, bottle blew up, levered, fired, etc.
>The Savage chugged happily right along. Man, that rotary mag is something
>else! And that smoooooooth lever action.... nice! Oh, and recoil? Still
>seemed non-existant to me. Like shooting a very LOUD .22!
BS>At the conclusion of this string, I turned to my lovely wife Weezie
>and informed her that we now had no need whatsoever for the Marlin 336 in
>.35 Remington, and quite little use for the No4 Enfield. In fact... well,
>I'm damn sure going to KEEP the best-beloved Ruger #1 .45-70, but it may
>get out to the deer woods this year. This Savage is the obvious natural
>choice for that little chore - and many others. :-)
BS>Weezie was tired and declined to shoot the Savage - frankly, she's not
>for any centerfire rifle that doesn't operate by the turnbolt method
>no matter HOW neat it may seem to ME.... (So, if she goes after deer this
>year she'll probably just tote her old infantry Krag again, as usual -
>that's HER idea of an all-around rifle, go figure).
BS>The crack in the Savage's stock didn't "grow" any during the firing, and
>looking at it closely I *think* it may have already been epoxied and
>repaired, perhaps years ago.... If not, though, no problem. This Winter
>I have the stock off to refinish it (to get rid of the putrid Savage
>"painted-on" finish) I'll take a better look at the crack and see if
>additional repair is required, and do whatever's necessary.
BS>I guess I'll put a scope on the Savage eventually, but I really don't mind
>the iron sights. Maybe I'll split the difference and put a receiver sight
>it? Don't know yet. Plenty of time to think about those options though -
>rifle's a definite keeper, so it'll be around....
BS>Only one trouble with this whole Savage 99 deal... already, I'm wanting
>*more*... a .250 would be nice, and maybe a .358, and, and.... :-)
BS>So it goes...

Write your reply.

assistant: 99.
to
Savage
Another toy, congrates!
If that doesn't work, use a bigger hammer!
Perceived
Louise struggling against the ropes again, huh?<G>  Or did she have you
this time!?!
relation
Must have been as a .308 will kick more than a .45-70.
function
ever
ffort
corrected
dovetail,
Good deal!
o
(Louise)
not
uch
anyway,
yeah,
Good rifle.
when
on
the
More, more, I'm still not satisfied!
Chuck
Chuck.Cunningham@HDCAFE.Riverside.Ca.US -or- Chuck@pe.net