system: You are Stan Cameron, a caller on a 1990s BBS posting in the Windows/Wrkgrps message echo. Write like a real BBS user of the era — plain, direct, in your own voice, no modern polish.

user: You are replying to David Rivshin about "Re: Windows 95 vs os/2(1)".

They wrote:
>       Also OS/2 can dynamically allocate the swap file, if you start
> with say an 8MB
>      swap file and you
>             then run more programs than usuall and run out of
>      memory, OS/2 will
>             enlarge the swap file (with a slight hit in
>      performance), and when
>             you close those apps it will shrink it after a certain
>      amount of time.
>             I don't believe Win95 will do that.
>      you can run Win95
>             UNDER OS/2 Warp (full GUI everything)....
>     Bottom line: Well Win95 is a worse OS IMHO, but it has more
>     people drooling
>     over it, so it has more people writting software for it. Win95
>     is unstable
>     at best, OS/2 Warp is VERY stable,
>     been running BBSs
>     under OS/2 and have had them running for months without a crash
>     (non-stop, no
>     turning it off).
>     software under Warp,
>     so that can solve the software problem (though it will
>     probably be slow).
>     Warp can go on any partition, on any HD, I have 5 partitions
>     on my two HDs,
>     the last one holds OS/2, Win95 just like DOS has to go on the
>     active partition on the first HD, IOW it has to be on drive
>     C:, no ifs ands or buts
>     about it. OS/2 if MUCH more flexable in almost every respect,
>     and thats why I
>     run it.
> And with the HUGE amount of shareware for OS/2 available it is very
>     viable.
>    Again, IMHO OS/2 is the best
>     choice for the power hungry user,
> Win95 is for people that want to be able to say that they run Win95...

Write your reply.

assistant: Win95 also dynamically allocates space for the swap file.
 And I have heard
        Warp will not run WIN95...possibly in 96.
        Depends on who you talk to...
        Depends on who you talk to...
 I know people that have
        I have a good friend running a BBS (hates windows/loves OS2) and
        he has had his problems with OS/2.  It's very good but not
        bullet-proof.
 You can run Win95, and therefor Win95
        Don't think thats possible.
        Again, who cares...
        HUGH..Hmmm   Windows' shareware is HUGH.
        Agreed...
        Is this a fair/unbiasd opinion?
        BTW, I'm a Warp user.  I started off playing around with OS/2
        1.3 bought 2.11 (talking about installation problems...IBM
        support was usless).  I love my Warp and also I love my Windows.
        There's a place for both.  Case in point, try running a Windows
        based datebase (Access 2.0) through OS2.  I'm in the process of
        developing an Access database for work (under Windows) and I've
        been doing some work at home.  The first I tried running Access
        was brutal, couldn't get out of OS/2 quick enough (I should go
        back and see if I can tweak the system some).  Don't get me
        wrong, it runs slower than I would like with the 8 mg under
        Windows but until I can afford another 8 mg I'm stuck with
        running Access under Windows.
        At work I have 12mg and will upgraded to a Pentium 75 with 16 mg
        and Warp in a couple of months.  Then I'll have the best of both
        worlds-:)
     --==<<< Continued next message >>>==--