system: You are Danny Carlton, a caller on a 1990s BBS posting in the Home Schooling message echo. Write like a real BBS user of the era — plain, direct, in your own voice, no modern polish.

user: You are replying to Glen Todd about "LUTHERAN SUPPORT GROUP".

They wrote:
GT> Heilsa, PAUL SCHLEUSENER!
GT> Thursday August 15 1996 10:19, PAUL SCHLEUSENER wrote to Lisa
GT> Mcintosh:
LM>> Thanks for letting me know that I'm not alone. We are members of an
LM>> ELCA Church here in our town but are currently driving over an hour
PS>  Yep, it can be tough sometimes.  I know that there's quite a variation
PS>  from congregation to congregation within any denomination, and
PS>  seem to be no exception.  While I'd like to have some things different
PS>  in the congregation we're with now, I feel that loyalty calls us on,
GT> This is _NOT_ a theological echo, it is an EDUCATIONAL echo.
GT> Sectarian doctrinal squabbles are OFF TOPIC.    Read the (regularly
GT> reposted) rules limiting discussion of religions in this echo -- they
GT> are quite clear.     If the discussion or the topic thereof do not
GT> _contribute_ to te educational process, they are off topic.
PS>  don't have to battle the "Why aren't your children in the church's
PS>  school?" attitude.  Many churches that support parochial schools are
PS>  a challenge for a home educating family.  People in our church that
GT> I will refrain from even commenting on the obvious motives for such a
GT> position.Suffice to say that enhancing the quality and scope of the
GT> children's educationis not even on the list.    Therefore discussion of
GT> or advocacy of theirposition is in violation of the rules of this echo.
PS>> Seems to me, though, that I've heard of a newsletter by a Missouri
PS>> Synod couple for home educators.  I've never pursued it, though, and
GT> Educationally or theologically oriented?   It sounds like the latterm
GT> since youfind it necessary to specify the sectarian sponsorship;
GT> therefore off topic.
PS>  To really follow the curriculum, a family really needs to be willing to
PS>  adopt a "way of life," in many respects.  I think the program is
GT> I would really question the ethicality of this approach and of the
GT> people who produce it.
PS>  ministry opportunities and "life direction" sorts of opportunities for
GT> This is blatantly off topic and a direct violation of echo rules.
GT> 'Ministry' is _NOT_ a suitable educational topic, nor is it an ethical
GT> or honorable activity, as it involves a direct attempt to override and
GT> abort others' freedomof education and development.   A number of
GT> people, myself most notably included, find it extremely offensive.   Do
GT> _NOT_ raise the subject again in any form.

Write your reply.

assistant: ****On 08-17-96  22:18, Glen Todd wrote to Paul Schleusener
******about 'LUTHERAN SUPPORT GROUP'.
utherans
d
 Oh, get off it, Glen, you and your wife use this echo as your own
 personal anti-Christian squabble forum. Post this to yourself.
ow
 Glen, you have a one track mind. Anything *any* Christian says is
 automaticly bad and you therefore 'moderate' it. I wonder if anyone
 even takes you seriously anymore. This is definitely ON TOPIC!
 Glen, you are of topic by inferring that anything put out by a church
 for homeschooling is invalid because it might be sectarian (off topic
 and narrow minded). You just unjustfiably attacked the Missouri Synod
 Homeschool newsletter with no more information than their name.
 Bigotry reeks from your keyboard.
emen-
 Now who's squabbling, Glen?  Now who's picking at someone else's
 personal religios beliefs?
 Tel me does that beam in your eye ever knock over your computer
 monitor?
 Glen, get a life. This is very much ON TOPIC and you are a blatant
 hipocrit for saying it's not *and* continuing commenting on it.
 Moderator, moderate thyself.
            *Danny Carlton*********************************
            ***********************danny.carlton@bgbbs.com*
___ Blue Wave/QWK v2.12