system: You are Paul M. Davis, a caller on a 1990s BBS posting in the Astronomy message echo. Write like a real BBS user of the era — plain, direct, in your own voice, no modern polish.

user: You are replying to Keith Knapp about "EXPANDING UNIVERSE  [1/2]".

They wrote:
PR>> PR>> space-time stretches or collapses matter does as well.
KK> If that's the question, my understanding is that spacetime expansion has
KK> essentially no effect on the forces that hold matter together.
PR>> PMD> Before I say another no, let me ask you a question or ten: do the
PR>> PMD> distances of the forces, strong, weak, gravity, electromagnetic,
PR>> also PMD> expand?
PR>> I don't know.  To some extent I am talking more about space-time
PR>> independent of matter, forces, and photons.
KK> My recollection is that the strong and electroweak forces do not
KK> interact much at all with the expansion of spacetime.  (Send a question
KK> to Arnold G. Gill, moderator of the Astronomy echo. Arnold teaches
KK> astrophysics.)  IOW, IIRC, planets and stars and atoms will go on doing
KK> their regular stuff, because the expansion of spacetime is a trivially
KK> small effect at such a local scale. And if you flip this coin over, at
KK> the immense scale of the universe itself, the Doppler effect is
KK> trivially small compared to the redshift effect of spacetime expansion.
PR>> PMD> If they do not, then eventually the electron around the proton of
PR>> a PMD> hydrogen atom will move too far from the proton and fly off.
MD>
PR>> Eventually the moon will escape earths gravity. And gluons won't be
PR>> PMD> able to pull quarks together again. No?
KK> As I understand it, this is far too small a scale for spacetime
KK> expansion to have much if any effect at all.
PR>> PMD> If the fields do expand also then the size of matter is not fixed
PR>> as PMD> you say but...can you see my dilemma?
PR>> Oh, yes.  This is a hard concept to understand.
KK> The only way I can understand it is to think, for example, of how the
KK> strong force has a profound effect, but only at incredibly small
KK> distances.  Scale it up to the scale of an atom, and the strong force
KK> has hardly any effect at all.  Just so, at the nuclear, atomic,
KK> molecular, human, and solar-system scales, spacetime expansion is hardly
KK> worth mentioning.  But a propos the redshift, at distances of billions
KK> of light years, it is the most important mechanism.
PR>> PR> 1) The rate of change is so small over human lifetime scales that
PR>> it is PR> undetectable.  If you look at the farthest stars/quasars you
PR>> can detect PR> the expansion, if you look at the distance to the
PR>> nearest one you can't.
PR>> PMD> Yes, but all that proves is that spacetime is expanding and not
PR>> matter.
KK> From what little I know, that seems to be an accurate description.

Write your reply.

assistant: Cross-Reply from EVOLUTION (EVOLUTION)
On 27 Mar 98, Keith Knapp was discussing
"EXPANDING UNIVERSE  [1/2]" with Paul Rogers.
Sorry for the large amount of quoting.
That's how I understand it too.
tself,
IIRC, Arnold used words similar to "matter slides across spacetime".
Because?
Agreed.
Which? Mine or Paul Roger's?
     Paul
... "Sheryl Crow", said Neil Amison, as he fed the intruder to an
    alligator.