system: You are Cameron Hall, a caller on a 1990s BBS posting in the Audio message echo. Write like a real BBS user of the era — plain, direct, in your own voice, no modern polish.

user: You are replying to Rick Mcbroom about "Re: CD-R".

They wrote:
-=> Quoting Rick Mcbroom to Cameron Hall on 28 Jan 98 05:24am <=-
-=> Subj: Re: CD-R <=-
RM>  Personally, I wouldn't worry about short-term exposure to sunlight.
RM>  Yes, but 9 times out of 10, the sunlight will strike only the top of
RM>  the disc, which doesn't carry data anyway.
RM>  I am using Win95, and I'm not aware of any such limitation.
RM>  The OmniWriter comes bundled with HyCD, and if there is such a
RM>  limitation, HyCD makes it completely transparent. My only gripe is
RM>  that the OEM version requires you to burn one track at a time, when
RM>  doing line-in recording. The "full version" lets you pick as many
RM>  tracks as you want. It's not that big of a deal, though, since you
RM>  can't multi-task when you're burning a CD, in any case. It only means
RM>  that you have to keep an eye on the process, and select each
RM>  successive track off the menu when the previous one's complete, where
RM>  with the full version you can select all the tracks at once, and walk
RM>  away from it.  When duping CD-to-CD,  the OEM version of HyCD can be
RM>  left unattended, though.
RM>  In a word, speed. The sound quality and compatibility are identical
RM>  between IDE and SCSI burners, but a SCSI system will let you do it in
RM>  half the time of IDE, at worst, and 1/4 the time if your system is
RM>  tuned perfectly.
RM>  The best IDE burners, so far, can write at 2x speed when doing CD-to-CD
RM>  duplication. But an IDE device is subject to buffer under-runs, so
RM>  unless you want to risk clipped and/or orphan tracks, you have to use
RM>  the "test- before-write" option, and that means you're effectively
RM>  back to real-time mastering.  With a SCSI burner you can do CD-CD
RM>  duplication at 4x with the "test-before-write" turned off, and still
RM>  be 99.4% sure of a good dup. That assumes that both the read /and/
RM>  write CD drives are SCSI, of course. A few semi-pro SCSI burners can
RM>  write at 8x, though that's dicey. You really need to
RM>  "test-before-write" at 8x, I imagine. And 8x burners are expen$ive!
RM>  2. Listen to the .WAV file, to verify that I didn't get any buffer
RM>     under-runs. You can dispense with this if you're brave.. while not
RM>     common, buffer under-runs DO happen, especially if the track is a
RM>     long one (over 7 to 8 minutes, say). Also real-time.
CH>> I would think that 1) Ultra-sonic "noise" from the vinyl and 2)
CH>> subsonic rumble would create problems.
RM>  I don't see why.. ? Certainly no more of a problem than recording an LP
RM>  to a conventional cassette or DAT.
RM>  Anyway, let me know if & when you get a CD-R, I'd be most interested in
RM>  hearing your experiences.

Write your reply.

assistant: Thanks.
But two things here.  That CD's "label" side many times is "Clear"
laquer.  (not the recordable ones though) Plus, the laquer would need
UV protection.  Remember, the laquer coating is softer and thinner than
the underside (lazer) surface.
Apperently, the stock Win95 Sound recorder has a 1 minute limit,
according to those in the Win95 echo.  Other software shouldn't do that.
Thanks for that info.
Too resource intensive?
How much extra do they dupe ya for the "full" version? :-)
Overall time isn't a concern here. :)
Interesting, like the DOS "VERIFY" command...
I'd want 100% reliablity.
Overall, the prices are coming down.
What "audible" effects do under-runs create?
Depends on how good the anti-Aliasing filters are in the A-D converters.
Will do.  I wonder if anyone is doing this stuff inder OS/2? <EG>
Cameron Hall
cameron.hall@bluebeam.gryn.org | ad121@hwcn.org
Blue Beam MailServer | 905 662 5784 | Stoney Creek ON Canada | v34 FAX