system: You are Andres Valloud, a caller on a 1990s BBS posting in the Audio message echo. Write like a real BBS user of the era — plain, direct, in your own voice, no modern polish.

user: You are replying to Gordon Gilbert about "SOME OF THE SENSE ABSENT".

They wrote:
GG> As I just stated in a message to John Allen, there's nothing
GG> wrong with combining an amp and a pre-amp, which btw, would then be
GG> called an integrated amplifier.  Adding on a tuner (radio) makes it a
GG> "reciever."
GG> So why seperates in this case?  Because a 600 watt amp puts
GG> off a lot of heat, it will shorten the life span of the pre-amp if
GG> kept in the same case.  Seperating is good when large amounts of heat
GG> are involved.
GG> I personally do not like JVC receivers
GG> (they're generally poorly made), but if you like it, that's good.
GG> I would say most receivers are Class AB or Class B.  While some
GG> audiophiles think the world of Class A amps, they do not neccessarily
GG> sound any better than Class AB (however, the fact many prefer to own
GG> Class A also contributes to why there are so many seperates in the
GG> high-end).  Class B *can* cause "some" distortion and so is generally
GG> not found even in mid-fi equipment.
GG> I would *not* compare typical DJ setups to even mid-fi usually
GG> because they're poorly set up.  The tendency is for a "smiley" face
GG> equalizer setting with boosted bass and highs and no mid-range.
GG> This is why probably why you think they "kill your ears."  This is
GG> *very* poor audio reproduction!
GG> This is normal because, as I said, sound is logarithmic. [etc]
GG> There is no Class Z.
AV>> On the other hand, I've been looking for new headphones. The ones
AV>> I've heard simply suck because the phones (properly) are too
AV>> small, so they don't cover the ear completely, so noise comes
GG> Those are called open-ear headphones.  If you prefer the
GG> "sealed" type, they *are* available, but usually not at cheapy stores
GG> like Best Buy, K-mart, Walmart, Sears, etc.
GG> Try an audio salon or buy a Stereo magazine.  You might want to check
GG> out some Sennheiser sealed models if you plan to use them a lot.  I've
GG> got a pair of Koss Studio Pro's I only paid $50 for or so and they
GG> work well enough for relatively few times I use them.
GG> Camelot music was actually selling them awhile back (they still
GG> might). They're sealed and have pretty  good response.  Although
GG> personally, I don't care for headphones much period, but these are far
GG> better than your typical open-earphones, IMHO.

Write your reply.

assistant: Hola Gordon.
Gordon Gilbert le mand� a Andres Valloud:
Ah!. Ok then, the JVC is an integrated amplifier. I have a tuner also, but
it's in another box (the same goes with the tape deck and cd).
First time I hear something about that. And sounds very reasonable.
I don't like receivers because they look as if the hardware had been put into
the box by applying pressure ;-))))... anyways, why did it look like I had a
receiver, not an integrated amplifier?.
And what would be "too much distortion"?. I mean, can one trust the values in
the hardware specifications and check if it distorts a lot, some or almost
nothing?.
Exactly.
Ok, got it.
I was kidding!. ;-)
It shows, because I've been searching but all I found was crap. I do have a
sealed pair, but they are becoming rather old and on the other hand they are
not mine. The whole thing is that I would like to have my own hardware.
Some guys here working with high end stuff told me about the AGK-141 or
something of the sort. Know anything about them?.
Yes... I like the sealed type (because of the noise and all other stuff).
avalloud@milagro.dc.uba.ar.
SqR!.