system: You are Curtis Johnson, a caller on a 1990s BBS posting in the Writing message echo. Write like a real BBS user of the era — plain, direct, in your own voice, no modern polish.

user: You are replying to Jack Ruttan about "Books".

They wrote:
CJ> "New Age" is a grab-bag of a term; if this discussion goes
JR> Categorizing is a pain. For me, I'd say "New Age" is anti-empirical,
JR> non-technological, often metaphysical, and not mainstream religious,
JR> either. I haven't tested this out, and certainly it could be shot down
JR> easily enough (plenty of "new-agey" technology, for instance.). Maybe
JR> anything that certain people I could imagine would think is nutty
JR> would fit.
> for instance, the classic "The Cold Equations."  The universe is
JR> I semi-followed the thread in Usenet about this story. It was a long
JR> time ago that I read it myself, but wasn't it postulating technology
JR> and "laws of nature" as immutable, and if so, probably the highest
JR> powers in the universe? I think a quantum notion of the universe makes
JR> things much more slippery, and is the reason why physics and
JR> psychology, for instance, slide so often into ideas that once would
JR> have been thought to be bizarre.
> seen "occult" schema used as frameworks for novels--including,
> IIRC, Joyce's _Ulysses_.
JR> Don't know about that. Maybe for a particular chapter I don't remember
JR> well. _Finnegans Wake_ is another thing altogether. However, while
JR> Joyce certainly studied folklore and language, I think he stayed far
JR> away from the magical dabblings that his predecessors such as Yeats had
JR> a fondness for. In fact, I think he would poo-poo it.
JR> Perec is famous for "Life: A User's Manual" (La Vie: Mode d'Emploi),
JR> which is a novel viewing an apartment building as sort of a jigsaw
JR> puzzle, with amazing stories about every apartment, the whole of which
JR> can almost be read in any order.
CJ> Even as we type, there's separate off-topic threads on both
> going on in rec.arts.sf.written.  One claims that dowsing works for
> him; he's getting very little support.  The UFO (not one of the
> nuts, just wondering if something's there) seems to be having the
> ground removed from him.
JR> This is pretty off-topic as well. Myself, I've had two genuine
JR> "X-files" type experiences. Still, I remain pretty much an empiricist,
JR> but enjoy investigating out of the way things for their creative
JR> potential.

Write your reply.

assistant: Sorry about the delayed reply.
	Not a bad listing of characteristics, and I'd agree with
 them.  However, as writers perhaps we should be most concerned with
 what publishers consider to be that genre--and imagine my surprise
 a couple of days ago when I saw that Bantam listed in its "New Age
 Library" Nobel Prize-winner Steven Weinberg's "The First Three
 Minutes of the Universe"!  Agreed, the target audience was probably
 in need of reading something like that book, but his particle
 physicist colleagues probably ribbed him to no end.
	For those who haven't read the story, the summary is that
 a teenaged girl stows away on a space-to-ground shuttle craft
 delivering a cargoload of vaccine to an epidemic-stricken planet.
 Her extra mass would mean that the craft would not have the fuel
 to land safely--it would crash.  The pilot is needed to pilot the
 craft.  She's persuaded to space herself.
	 No waving of quantum wands or positive thinking could
 have saved her.  The only question is whether she would be the
 only person to die from her mistake.  Not the kind of story a
 New Ager would relish reading.
	Quantum mechanics is rather bizarre, but that's only
 because we live in the macroscopic world.  From the "level"
 where QM is relevant, our macroscopic world would look pretty
 bizarre.
	I've seen a schema for the chapters of _Ulysses_--along with
 the chapters being inspired by various incidents in Homer, there was
 also supposed to be astrological correspondences, etc.
	You're basically right--Joyce may have drawn on it for
 artistic inspiration in the same way 19th-century British poets
 used Greek mythology, but Yeats was a True Believer.
	I've heard of the title--but thought it was a self-help
 book!
	They're worth investigating for even the most rationalist
 writer, because they say a great deal about people.