Q:

what is the PSD unit by using FFT method

I'm just doing a power spectral density analysis of a signal in time domain.  I'm following the fft method described in :
http://www.mathworks.com/support/tech-notes/1700/1702.html
It gives the real physical unit for the PSD.  However, the unit is "power", is that mean "V^2/Hz"? 
If I take 10*log10(power) or 10*log10(V^2/Hz), do I get the unit of "dB/Hz"? 
Then how can I convert it to dBm/MHz? 

A:

It depends on the unit of your timeseries.   Often we think of this as just "amplitude", but if your timeseries is a series of voltage amplitude vs. time, then your PSD estimate will be Volts^2/Hz.  This is because the PSD is the Fourier Transform of the autocorrelation of your original signal: The autocorrelation has units of Volts^2, and running it through the Fourier Transform decomposes these units over frequency, instead of time, resulting in units of Volts^2/Hz.   This is commonly referred to as Watts/Hz, but the conversion from Volts^2 to Watts is not very physically meaningful, as W = V^2/R.
10*log10(power) will result in a unit of dB/Hz, but remember that decibels are always a comparison between two power levels; you are quantifying a ratio of powers.   A better definition of decibels is 10*log10(P1/P0), as explained here.  If you simply plug a PSD bin estimate into this equation, you are setting your PSD bin to P1 and implicitly comparing it to a P0 value of 1.   This may be what you want, and it may not be.   For visualization purposes, this is fairly typical, but if you have a standard reference power you should be comparing to, you should use that for P0 instead. 
Assuming that you are attempting to plot a dB Power Spectral Density estimate, to convert from Hz to MHz, you simple rescale the x-axis of your frequency graph.   Remember that a MHz is just 1 million Hz, so the only difference is that 240000Hz = 0.24MHz
EDIT
The point brought up by mtrw is a very valid one; if you are dealing with large amounts of data and are averaging FFT vectors, I highly suggest the Multitaper method; it's a much more statistically sound method of sacrificing frequency resolution for greater confidence on your PSD estimate.