I listened to a fine talk tonight at the Rhine Research Center in Durham, North Carolina by Louis LaGrand on extraordinary experiences of those grieving a loved one.  Many of these individuals have an experience of the loved one communicating with them, ranging from an intuition of the deceased person’s presence to a full-body apparition carrying on a conversation with the surviving loved one.  Many people who have such experiences, which as LaGrand noted, are really “ordinary” rather than “extraordinary” (millions of people have them) are given a cold shoulder by fundamentalists from two camps: the religious and the secular. 

Secular fundamentalists who accept materialism as their religion would reject such experiences as subjective hallucinations.  No matter what veridical evidence the grieving person offered, the secular fundamentalist would automatically reject it.  These secular fundamentalists are often college and university professors who should be open minded, but who would not hesitate to ostracize or even threaten the job of an academic who dares to take these experiences as possibly objective or real.  If secular fundamentalists are wrong about exceptional experiences being hallucinatory only, then their entire world view would be undermined.  Their religious faith in secularism would be destroyed.  And since many secularists are still in adolescent rebellion against an overly rigid religious upbringing, they will insist that any evidence contrary to their own views is invalid, the facts be damned. 

The same is true of religious fundamentalists.  Protestant fundamentalists, for example, will say, “The Bible says the dead don’t contact us and we shouldn’t contact them.  If anything does contact us, it’s probably a demon rather than a loved one.”  Of course they ignore Samuel’s vision of Saul rising up from Sheol, but they claim that was a one-time exception due to the permission of God. 

The ignorance of Christian fundamentalists lies primarily in their claiming to know more than they really do.  How do they know what state human souls are in between death and resurrection?  How do they know whether the Biblical injunctions against mediumship and communication with the dead applied to such practices in pagan religious circles?  How do they know that God would not give permission to a deceased individual, in certain cases, to communicate with a living person who needs comfort?  I have always been impressed by the intellectual pretense and arrogance of fundamentalism, both Christian and secular.  Both ignore the possibility that deceased loved ones may indeed be contacting their grieving friends and relatives.  Both ignore a potential way through exceptional experiences to comfort the grieving in their loss.