import Mathlib.Tactic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.MinimalAxioms

namespace Section_4_2

structure PreRat where
  numerator : ℤ
  denominator : ℤ
  nonzero : denominator ≠ 0

/-- Exercise 4.2.1 -/
instance PreRat.instSetoid : Setoid PreRat where
  r a b := a.numerator * b.denominator = b.numerator * a.denominator
  iseqv := {
    refl := by sorry
    symm := by sorry
    trans := by sorry
    }

@[simp]
theorem PreRat.eq (a b c d:ℤ) (hb: b ≠ 0) (hd: d ≠ 0) :
    (⟨ a,b,hb ⟩: PreRat) ≈ ⟨ c,d,hd ⟩ ↔ a * d = c * b := by rfl

abbrev Rat := Quotient PreRat.instSetoid

/-- We give division a "junk" value of 0//1 if the denominator is zero -/
abbrev Rat.formalDiv (a b:ℤ) : Rat :=
  Quotient.mk PreRat.instSetoid (if h:b ≠ 0 then ⟨ a,b,h ⟩ else ⟨ 0, 1, by decide ⟩)

infix:100 " // " => Rat.formalDiv

/-- Definition 4.2.1 (Rationals) -/
theorem Rat.eq (a c:ℤ) {b d:ℤ} (hb: b ≠ 0) (hd: d ≠ 0): a // b = c // d ↔ a * d = c * b := by
  simp [formalDiv, hb, hd, Quotient.eq, PreRat.instSetoid]

/-- Definition 4.2.1 (Rationals) -/
theorem Rat.eq_diff (n:Rat) : ∃ a b, b ≠ 0 ∧ n = a // b := by
  apply Quotient.ind _ n; intro ⟨ a, b, h ⟩
  refine ⟨ a, b, h, ?_ ⟩
  simp [formalDiv, h]

/--
  Decidability of equality. Hint: modify the proof of `DecidableEq Int` from the previous
  section. However, because formal division handles the case of zero denominator separately, it
  may be more convenient to avoid that operation and work directly with the `Quotient` API.
-/
instance Rat.decidableEq : DecidableEq Rat := by
  sorry

/-- Lemma 4.2.3 (Addition well-defined) -/
instance Rat.add_inst : Add Rat where
  add := Quotient.lift₂ (fun ⟨ a, b, h1 ⟩ ⟨ c, d, h2 ⟩ ↦ (a*d+b*c) // (b*d)) (by
    intro ⟨ a, b, h1 ⟩ ⟨ c, d, h2 ⟩ ⟨ a', b', h1' ⟩ ⟨ c', d', h2' ⟩ h3 h4
    simp_all [Quotient.eq, PreRat.instSetoid]
    linear_combination d * d' * h3 + b * b' * h4
  )

/-- Definition 4.2.2 (Addition of rationals) -/
theorem Rat.add_eq (a c:ℤ) {b d:ℤ} (hb: b ≠ 0) (hd: d ≠ 0) :
    (a // b) + (c // d) = (a*d + b*c) // (b*d) := by
  convert Quotient.lift₂_mk _ _ _ _ <;> simp [hb, hd]

/-- Lemma 4.2.3 (Multiplication well-defined) -/
instance Rat.mul_inst : Mul Rat where
  mul := Quotient.lift₂ (fun ⟨ a, b, h1 ⟩ ⟨ c, d, h2 ⟩ ↦ (a*c) // (b*d)) (by sorry)

/-- Definition 4.2.2 (Multiplication of rationals) -/
theorem Rat.mul_eq (a c:ℤ) {b d:ℤ} (hb: b ≠ 0) (hd: d ≠ 0) :
    (a // b) * (c // d) = (a*c) // (b*d) := by
  convert Quotient.lift₂_mk _ _ _ _ <;> simp [hb, hd]

/-- Lemma 4.2.3 (Negation well-defined) -/
instance Rat.neg_inst : Neg Rat where
  neg := Quotient.lift (fun ⟨ a, b, h1 ⟩ ↦ (-a) // b) (by sorry)

/-- Definition 4.2.2 (Negation of rationals) -/
theorem Rat.neg_eq (a:ℤ) {b:ℤ} (hb: b ≠ 0) : - (a // b) = (-a) // b := by
  convert Quotient.lift_mk _ _ _ <;> simp [hb]

/-- Embedding the integers in the rationals -/
instance Rat.instIntCast : IntCast Rat where
  intCast a := a // 1

instance Rat.instNatCast : NatCast Rat where
  natCast n := (n:ℤ) // 1

instance Rat.instOfNat {n:ℕ} : OfNat Rat n where
  ofNat := (n:ℤ) // 1

/-- Proposition 4.2.4 (laws of algebra) / Exercise 4.2.3 -/
instance Rat.addGroup_inst : AddGroup Rat :=
AddGroup.ofLeftAxioms (by
  -- this proof is written to follow the structure of the original text.
  intro x y z
  obtain ⟨ a, b, hb, rfl ⟩ := eq_diff x
  obtain ⟨ c, d, hd, rfl ⟩ := eq_diff y
  obtain ⟨ e, f, hf, rfl ⟩ := eq_diff z
  have hbd : b*d ≠ 0 := Int.mul_ne_zero hb hd     -- can also use `observe hbd : b*d ≠ 0` here
  have hdf : d*f ≠ 0 := Int.mul_ne_zero hd hf     -- can also use `observe hdf : d*f ≠ 0` here
  have hbdf : b*d*f ≠ 0 := Int.mul_ne_zero hbd hf -- can also use `observe hbdf : b*d*f ≠ 0` here
  rw [add_eq _ _ hb hd, add_eq _ _ hbd hf, add_eq _ _ hd hf,
      add_eq _ _ hb hdf, ←mul_assoc b, eq _ _ hbdf hbdf]
  ring
)
 (by sorry) (by sorry)

/-- Proposition 4.2.4 (laws of algebra) / Exercise 4.2.3 -/
instance Rat.instAddCommGroup : AddCommGroup Rat where
  add_comm := by
end Section_4_2