introvoyz041/BioNLP huggingface dataset:
Criterion: 1. Title
Fail: Too vague. Not representative
of the content of the study.
Discrepancies between Swedish
and English title.
Pass (T5): Clearly stated; complete.
Representative of the content of
the study. Interesting. English
and Swedish titles are and
corresponding.
Pass (T10): Clearly stated; complete.
Representative of the content of
the study. Interesting. English
and Swedish titles are and
corresponding.
Criterion: 2.Abstract
(max 300 words)
Fail: Missing, too long or too short.
The different parts of the
abstract are not proportional to
each other.
Pass (T5): Correct length. Contains
background, purpose, methods,
results and conclusion in
adequate proportions.
Pass (T10): Correct length. Contains
background, purpose, methods,
results and conclusion in
adequate proportions.
Excellently written, clear and
concise.
Criterion: 3. Background
CORE
Fail: Missing, too short or with
limited relevance to the topic.
No references or inadequate
references.
Pass (T5): Gives a general perspective on
the topic supported by
adequate number of relevant
references.
Pass (T10): Gives both a general and an in-
depth perspective on the topic,
supported by an adequate
number of relevant references
describing what is known and
what is not known.
Criterion: 4.Purpose
Fail: Missing or irrelevant to the
topic or unclearly formulated.
Pass (T5): Well formulated and relevant to
the topic.
Pass (T10): Well formulated, highly relevant
and well anchored in the
background.
Criterion: 5. Scientific questions
or hypothesis CORE
Fail: Missing, irrelevant to the topic
or inadequately formulated.
Unreasonable in relation to the
extent of the project. Poorly
reflecting the purpose.
Pass (T5): Well formulated and reflecting
the purpose. Well-defined and
reasonable in relation to the
extent of the project.
Pass (T10): Well formulated and very
clearly reflecting the purpose.
Well-defined and reasonable in
relation to the extent of the
project.
Criterion: 6. Methods
CORE
Fail: Inadequate for answering the
scientific questions.
Wrongly applied.
Description of methods missing or
inadequate.
Choice or description of methods
not sufficiently supported by a
suitable number of adequate
references.
Description of analyses (in
applicable cases statistical
methods) inadequate.
Pass (T5): Adequate for answering the
scientific questions.
Method correctly applied.
Description and choice of methods
sufficiently supported by a
suitable number of adequate
references.
Analyses (in applicable cases
statistical methods) are clearly
described and correctly used.
Pass (T10): Adequate for answering the
scientific questions.
Method correctly applied.
Description and well-argued
choice of methods sufficiently
supported by a suitable number of
adequate references.
Analyses (in applicable cases
statistical methods) are very
clearly described and correctly
used.
Criterion: 7. Ethics
Ethical permits should not be
discussed, as this fall under
the responsibility of the
supervisor and course leader.
Fail: Research ethical considerations
are missing, irrelevant for the
project or inadequately described
Pass (T5): Research ethical considerations
relevant for the project are
correctly identified and applied,
described and discussed under a
separate heading. If the project
does not require ethical
considerations this should be
clearly stated.
Pass (T10): Research ethical considerations
relevant for the project are
correctly identified and applied,
well described and discussed
under a separate heading. If the
project does not require ethical
considerations this should be
clearly stated. Present and future
ethical implications are included if
applicable.
Criterion: 9. Discussion
CORE
Fail: Not relevant to the study or
poorly structured. No connection
to the results or to previous
research. Strengths and
weaknesses of the study are not
mentioned.
Pass (T5): Adequate discussion of the main
results in relation to scientific
questions and previous research
in the field, with references
given. Most of the study ́s
strength and weakness and
limitations of the methods are
discussed. Adequately
structured. Novelty clearly
described.
Pass (T10): Well written discussion of the
main results in relation to
scientific questions and previous
research in the field, with
references given. Most of the
study ́s strength and weakness,
limitations of the methods and
potential bias are exhaustively
discussed in relation to present
knowledge. Excellently
structured. Novelty clearly
described.
Criterion: 10.Conclusion
Fail: Missing or not clearly related to
results or not relevant to
scientific questions or purpose.
Pass (T5): Concisely states main findings
and relates them to scientific
questions and purpose. Clarifies
importance of the findings.
Adequately formulated.
Pass (T10): Concisely states main findings
and relates them to scientific
questions and purpose. Clearly
states importance of the findings
and their implications in short
and long perspectives. Concise
and well formulated.
Criterion: 11.References
(formalia)
Fail: Missing, irrelevant, too basic or
poorly organized references.
Pass (T5): Relevant references, mainly
scientific papers, used and
referred to properly. All
references in correct order and
in the same format. The
numbers of references in the
different sections are in parity
with the extent and depth of the
project.
Pass (T10): Relevant references, mainly
scientific papers, used and
referred to properly. All
references in correct order and
in the same format. The
numbers of references in the
different sections are in parity
with the extent and depth of the
project.
Criterion: 12.Popular science
abstract in Swedish
Fail: Missing or irrelevant. Scientific
or medical terms that may be
unknown to the public are used.
Pass (T5): Relevant, clear and easy to
grasp, using terminology
understandable to lay people.
Pass (T10): Relevant, clear and easy to
grasp, using terminology
understandable to lay people.
Markedly interesting.
Criterion: 13.Structure and
language
CORE
Fail: Unstructured overall impression,
inaccurate use of specialist
terminology or a grammatically
incorrect language management.
Pass (T5): Written in a structured way,
correct use of specialist
terminology; grammatically
correct language management,
Pass (T10): Written in a well-structured way
with a good flow between the
different parts of the essay,
correct use of specialist
Fail: Inaccurate choice of
Swedish/English in relation to
syllabus.
Pass (T5): correct language in relation to
syllabus.
Pass (T10): terminology; grammatically
correct language management,
correct language in relation to
syllabus.
Tables and figures must be
readable without the main text
Criterion: 14.Declaration of own
contribution
Fail: The declaration of the student ́s
own specific contribution is
missing, is incomplete or difficult
to understand.
Pass (T5): The declaration of the student ́s
own specific contribution is
adequate, concise and easy to
understand.
Pass (T10): The declaration of the student ́s
own specific contribution is
adequate, concise and easy to
understand.
Criterion: 15.Control of
plagiarism
Fail: High degree of overlap with
previously published texts, which
cannot be motivated.
Pass (T5): Minor or reasonable degree of
overlap with previously
published texts, which can the
student can motivate.
Pass (T10): Minor or reasonable degree of
overlap with previously
published texts, which can the
student can motivate and
discuss.