internlm/SWE-Fixer-Train-110K huggingface dataset:
Repository: jazzband/django-oauth-toolkit

Issue:
Avoid generation of client_id with ":" colon char when using HTTP Basic Auth
This is related to HTTP Basic Auth: the spec forbids the use of colon char in the userid but not in the password. See [RFC2617](http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2617#section-2) for more details



Discussion:

Resolving patch:
diff --git a/oauth2_provider/generators.py b/oauth2_provider/generators.py
--- a/oauth2_provider/generators.py
+++ b/oauth2_provider/generators.py
@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
+from oauthlib.common import CLIENT_ID_CHARACTER_SET, generate_client_id as oauthlib_generate_client_id
+
 from .settings import oauth2_settings
-from .utils import long_hash, short_hash
 
 
 class BaseHashGenerator(object):
@@ -12,12 +13,17 @@ def hash(self):
 
 class ClientIdGenerator(BaseHashGenerator):
     def hash(self):
-        return short_hash()
+        """
+        Generate a client_id without colon char as in http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2617#section-2
+        for Basic Authentication scheme
+        """
+        client_id_charset = CLIENT_ID_CHARACTER_SET.replace(":", "")
+        return oauthlib_generate_client_id(length=40, chars=client_id_charset)
 
 
 class ClientSecretGenerator(BaseHashGenerator):
     def hash(self):
-        return long_hash()
+        return oauthlib_generate_client_id(length=128)
 
 
 def generate_client_id():
diff --git a/oauth2_provider/oauth2_validators.py b/oauth2_provider/oauth2_validators.py
--- a/oauth2_provider/oauth2_validators.py
+++ b/oauth2_provider/oauth2_validators.py
@@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ def authenticate_client(self, request, *args, **kwargs):
         encoding = request.encoding or 'utf-8'
 
         auth_string_decoded = base64.b64decode(auth_string).decode(encoding)
-        client_id, client_secret = auth_string_decoded.split(':')
+        client_id, client_secret = auth_string_decoded.split(':', 1)
 
         try:
             request.client = Application.objects.get(client_id=client_id, client_secret=client_secret)
diff --git a/oauth2_provider/utils.py b/oauth2_provider/utils.py
deleted file mode 100644
--- a/oauth2_provider/utils.py
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,16 +0,0 @@
-import uuid
-import hashlib
-
-
-def short_hash():
-    """
-    Generate a unique short hash (40 bytes) which is suitable as a token, secret or id
-    """
-    return hashlib.sha1(uuid.uuid1().bytes).hexdigest()
-
-
-def long_hash():
-    """
-    Generate a unique long hash (128 bytes) which is suitable as a token, secret or id
-    """
-    return hashlib.sha512(uuid.uuid1().bytes).hexdigest()


Test patch:
Repository: jazzband/django-oauth-toolkit

Issue:
Add django-oauth-toolkit version on example main page



Discussion:

Resolving patch:
diff --git a/example/example/urls.py b/example/example/urls.py
--- a/example/example/urls.py
+++ b/example/example/urls.py
@@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
 from django.contrib import admin
 from django.core.urlresolvers import reverse_lazy
 from django.views.generic import TemplateView
+from oauth2_provider import VERSION
 
 from .views import ConsumerView, ConsumerExchangeView, ConsumerDoneView, ApiEndpoint
 
@@ -9,7 +10,7 @@
 
 urlpatterns = patterns(
     '',
-    url(r'^$', TemplateView.as_view(template_name='example/home.html'), name='home'),
+    url(r'^$', TemplateView.as_view(template_name='example/home.html'), {'version': VERSION}, name='home'),
     url(r'^accounts/login/$', 'django.contrib.auth.views.login', {'template_name': 'example/login.html'}),
     url(r'^accounts/logout/$', 'django.contrib.auth.views.logout', {'next_page': reverse_lazy('home')}),
     url(r'^admin/', include(admin.site.urls)),


Test patch:
Repository: jazzband/django-oauth-toolkit

Issue:
redirect uri on error (e.g. AuthCanceled) may contain two question marks, thus sending the wrong exception
I'm using django-oauth-toolkit along with python-social-auth and of course oauthlib which is a requirement of both, and I've run into an issue when the user clicks the "cancel" button. 

The wrong exception may occur because of a redirect problem.  When the user clicks "cancel", if the redirect_uri contains any URL parameters, an incorrect state error is given instead of `AuthCanceled`, because the URI ends up something like:

`http://example.com?redirect_state=SOME_STATE_TOKEN?error=access_denied`

Note the two question marks here. This is due to an issue in mixins.py - a pull request that fixes this is forthcoming.



Discussion:

Resolving patch:
diff --git a/oauth2_provider/views/mixins.py b/oauth2_provider/views/mixins.py
--- a/oauth2_provider/views/mixins.py
+++ b/oauth2_provider/views/mixins.py
@@ -155,9 +155,17 @@ def error_response(self, error, **kwargs):
         :param error: :attr:`OAuthToolkitError`
         """
         oauthlib_error = error.oauthlib_error
+
+        separator = '?'
+        try:
+            if '?' in oauthlib_error.redirect_uri:
+                separator = '&'
+        except:
+            pass
+
         error_response = {
             'error': oauthlib_error,
-            'url': "{0}?{1}".format(oauthlib_error.redirect_uri, oauthlib_error.urlencoded)
+            'url': "{0}{1}{2}".format(oauthlib_error.redirect_uri, separator, oauthlib_error.urlencoded)
         }
         error_response.update(kwargs)
 


Test patch:
Repository: jazzband/django-oauth-toolkit

Issue:
Error when requesting an oauth access token with the same request encoding as the django default
Details in this SO question: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/34403912/when-trying-to-request-for-oauth-access-token-i-get-typeerror-encode-argumen

Error is `TypeError: encode() argument 1 must be string, not None`



Discussion:

Resolving patch:
diff --git a/oauth2_provider/oauth2_validators.py b/oauth2_provider/oauth2_validators.py
--- a/oauth2_provider/oauth2_validators.py
+++ b/oauth2_provider/oauth2_validators.py
@@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
 from datetime import timedelta
 
 from django.utils import timezone
+from django.conf import settings
 from django.contrib.auth import authenticate
 from django.core.exceptions import ObjectDoesNotExist
 from oauthlib.oauth2 import RequestValidator
@@ -57,7 +58,7 @@ def _authenticate_basic_auth(self, request):
             return False
 
         try:
-            encoding = request.encoding
+            encoding = request.encoding or settings.DEFAULT_CHARSET or 'utf-8'
         except AttributeError:
             encoding = 'utf-8'
 


Test patch:
diff --git a/oauth2_provider/tests/test_oauth2_validators.py b/oauth2_provider/tests/test_oauth2_validators.py
--- a/oauth2_provider/tests/test_oauth2_validators.py
+++ b/oauth2_provider/tests/test_oauth2_validators.py
@@ -53,6 +53,12 @@ def test_authenticate_basic_auth(self):
         self.request.headers = {'HTTP_AUTHORIZATION': 'Basic Y2xpZW50X2lkOmNsaWVudF9zZWNyZXQ=\n'}
         self.assertTrue(self.validator._authenticate_basic_auth(self.request))
 
+    def test_authenticate_basic_auth_default_encoding(self):
+        self.request.encoding = None
+        # client_id:client_secret
+        self.request.headers = {'HTTP_AUTHORIZATION': 'Basic Y2xpZW50X2lkOmNsaWVudF9zZWNyZXQ=\n'}
+        self.assertTrue(self.validator._authenticate_basic_auth(self.request))
+
     def test_authenticate_basic_auth_wrong_client_id(self):
         self.request.encoding = 'utf-8'
         # wrong_id:client_secret
Repository: jazzband/django-oauth-toolkit

Issue:
POST /o/introspect/ endpoint requires WRITE_SCOPE in addition to "introspection"
POST /o/introspect/ returns a 403 when the scope of the access token only contains "introspection". Adding the WRITE_SCOPE value ("write") makes it succeed. This is because by default a POST is considered something requiring a WRITE_SCOPE in [views.mixins.ReadWriteScopedResourceMixin.dispatch](https://github.com/evonove/django-oauth-toolkit/blob/master/oauth2_provider/views/mixins.py#L237-L242)




Discussion:
Here's the stack trace:

![trace](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/4356471/36165959-2b5227c4-10bf-11e8-9ccb-f86030dfba93.png)

I interpreted the Introspection Endpoint as a resource so you can manage the clients (RS) within the AS itself.
Basically it's as `GET` request as we don't create any resources. Do you expect the behavior to be changed? I would be fine with this.
It's not a big deal. Just that an introspection POST is not in fact a write so shouldn't be checking for WRITE_SCOPE. So the ReadWriteSourceMixin is getting used somewhere where it shouldn't.
Yes you are right.
So we should use the `ScopedProtectedResourceView`?

Resolving patch:
diff --git a/oauth2_provider/views/introspect.py b/oauth2_provider/views/introspect.py
--- a/oauth2_provider/views/introspect.py
+++ b/oauth2_provider/views/introspect.py
@@ -9,11 +9,11 @@
 from django.views.decorators.csrf import csrf_exempt
 
 from oauth2_provider.models import get_access_token_model
-from oauth2_provider.views import ReadWriteScopedResourceView
+from oauth2_provider.views import ScopedProtectedResourceView
 
 
 @method_decorator(csrf_exempt, name="dispatch")
-class IntrospectTokenView(ReadWriteScopedResourceView):
+class IntrospectTokenView(ScopedProtectedResourceView):
     """
     Implements an endpoint for token introspection based
     on RFC 7662 https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7662


Test patch:
diff --git a/tests/test_introspection_auth.py b/tests/test_introspection_auth.py
--- a/tests/test_introspection_auth.py
+++ b/tests/test_introspection_auth.py
@@ -96,7 +96,7 @@ def setUp(self):
             user=self.resource_server_user, token="12345678900",
             application=self.application,
             expires=timezone.now() + datetime.timedelta(days=1),
-            scope="read write introspection"
+            scope="introspection"
         )
 
         self.invalid_token = AccessToken.objects.create(
diff --git a/tests/test_introspection_view.py b/tests/test_introspection_view.py
--- a/tests/test_introspection_view.py
+++ b/tests/test_introspection_view.py
@@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ def setUp(self):
             user=self.resource_server_user, token="12345678900",
             application=self.application,
             expires=timezone.now() + datetime.timedelta(days=1),
-            scope="read write introspection"
+            scope="introspection"
         )
 
         self.valid_token = AccessToken.objects.create(
Repository: jazzband/django-oauth-toolkit

Issue:
access token detail page in admin very slow
We upgrade django-oauth-toolkit recently, and can't open access token detail page in admin now, because source_refresh_token is not in raw_id_fields, and can be a very large list. 


Discussion:

Resolving patch:
diff --git a/oauth2_provider/admin.py b/oauth2_provider/admin.py
--- a/oauth2_provider/admin.py
+++ b/oauth2_provider/admin.py
@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ class GrantAdmin(admin.ModelAdmin):
 
 class AccessTokenAdmin(admin.ModelAdmin):
     list_display = ("token", "user", "application", "expires")
-    raw_id_fields = ("user", )
+    raw_id_fields = ("user", "source_refresh_token")
 
 
 class RefreshTokenAdmin(admin.ModelAdmin):


Test patch:
Repository: jazzband/django-oauth-toolkit

Issue:
LIMIT/OFFSET is not supported with select_for_update on this database backend.
We are using Oracle Database 12c Enterprise Edition Release 12.2.0.1.0, which from what I researched it seems the issue is coming from [this statement](https://github.com/jazzband/django-oauth-toolkit/blob/master/oauth2_provider/models.py#L406-L409) since 12c doesn't allow limits in ```select_for_update``` statements. We were able to fix it with:
```python
            try:
                self = refresh_token_model.select_for_update().get(
                    pk=self.pk, revoked__isnull=True
                )
            except refresh_token_model.DoesNotExist:
                return
```

It would be great if we could stop maintaining the fork and just use the release version.


Discussion:
@dag18e care to send a patch?
Sure! We replaced [your code here](https://github.com/jazzband/django-oauth-toolkit/blob/master/oauth2_provider/models.py#L390-L395) with [this.](https://github.com/SpencerjCarroll/django-oauth-toolkit/blob/stable/1.1/oauth2_provider/models.py#L359-L366) 
Is it important to set `self = None` if you `return` just after ?
@0ddlyoko No, you're right. The ```self = None``` line can be cut. Thanks for pointing that out.

Resolving patch:
diff --git a/oauth2_provider/models.py b/oauth2_provider/models.py
--- a/oauth2_provider/models.py
+++ b/oauth2_provider/models.py
@@ -401,13 +401,15 @@ def revoke(self):
         access_token_model = get_access_token_model()
         refresh_token_model = get_refresh_token_model()
         with transaction.atomic():
-            self = (
-                refresh_token_model.objects.filter(pk=self.pk, revoked__isnull=True)
-                .select_for_update()
-                .first()
-            )
-            if not self:
+            try:
+                token = refresh_token_model.objects.select_for_update().filter(
+                    pk=self.pk, revoked__isnull=True
+                )
+            except refresh_token_model.DoesNotExist:
+                return
+            if not token:
                 return
+            self = list(token)[0]
 
             try:
                 access_token_model.objects.get(id=self.access_token_id).revoke()


Test patch:
Repository: jazzband/django-oauth-toolkit

Issue:
Add missing migration caused by #1020
Discovered by @max-wittig:
```sh
poetry run python manage.py makemigrations --check --dry-run
Migrations for 'oauth2_provider':
  /Users/max/Library/Caches/pypoetry/virtualenvs/codeapps-wUwe-wZH-py3.10/lib/python3.10/site-packages/oauth2_provider/migrations/0006_alter_application_client_secret.py
    - Alter field client_secret on application
```

_Originally posted by @max-wittig in https://github.com/jazzband/django-oauth-toolkit/issues/1067#issuecomment-1005204093_


Discussion:
#1020 needs an accompanying migration due to changing the type of the `client_secret`

Resolving patch:
diff --git a/oauth2_provider/migrations/0006_alter_application_client_secret.py b/oauth2_provider/migrations/0006_alter_application_client_secret.py
new file mode 100644
--- /dev/null
+++ b/oauth2_provider/migrations/0006_alter_application_client_secret.py
@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
+# Generated by Django 4.0.1 on 2022-01-07 22:40
+
+from django.db import migrations
+import oauth2_provider.generators
+import oauth2_provider.models
+
+
+class Migration(migrations.Migration):
+
+    dependencies = [
+        ('oauth2_provider', '0005_auto_20211222_2352'),
+    ]
+
+    operations = [
+        migrations.AlterField(
+            model_name='application',
+            name='client_secret',
+            field=oauth2_provider.models.ClientSecretField(blank=True, db_index=True, default=oauth2_provider.generators.generate_client_secret, max_length=255),
+        ),
+    ]


Test patch:
Repository: jazzband/django-oauth-toolkit

Issue:
'token' not a valid search field in admin
Is this valid? Searching from the admin now gives me `django.core.exceptions.FieldError: Cannot resolve keyword 'token' into field. Choices are: access_token, application, application_id, created, expires, id, jti, scope, updated, user, user_id`

_Originally posted by @danlamanna in https://github.com/jazzband/django-oauth-toolkit/pull/1041#discussion_r781625094_
'token' not a valid search field in admin
Is this valid? Searching from the admin now gives me `django.core.exceptions.FieldError: Cannot resolve keyword 'token' into field. Choices are: access_token, application, application_id, created, expires, id, jti, scope, updated, user, user_id`

_Originally posted by @danlamanna in https://github.com/jazzband/django-oauth-toolkit/pull/1041#discussion_r781625094_


Discussion:

Resolving patch:
diff --git a/oauth2_provider/admin.py b/oauth2_provider/admin.py
--- a/oauth2_provider/admin.py
+++ b/oauth2_provider/admin.py
@@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ class ApplicationAdmin(admin.ModelAdmin):
         "client_type": admin.HORIZONTAL,
         "authorization_grant_type": admin.VERTICAL,
     }
+    search_fields = ("name",) + (("user__email",) if has_email else ())
     raw_id_fields = ("user",)
 
 
@@ -39,12 +40,13 @@ class AccessTokenAdmin(admin.ModelAdmin):
 class GrantAdmin(admin.ModelAdmin):
     list_display = ("code", "application", "user", "expires")
     raw_id_fields = ("user",)
+    search_fields = ("code",) + (("user__email",) if has_email else ())
 
 
 class IDTokenAdmin(admin.ModelAdmin):
     list_display = ("jti", "user", "application", "expires")
     raw_id_fields = ("user",)
-    search_fields = ("token",) + (("user__email",) if has_email else ())
+    search_fields = ("user__email",) if has_email else ()
     list_filter = ("application",)
 
 


Test patch:
Repository: jazzband/django-oauth-toolkit

Issue:
Default value for CLEAR_EXPIRED_TOKENS_BATCH_INTERVAL
@merito Sorry this is after the fact but wouldn't a default value of 0 be best, especially since the sleep is always executed even if the batch is tiny.
https://github.com/merito/django-oauth-toolkit/blob/725c3c9d8927379c9808abd1badb4fcd9ff1cbaa/oauth2_provider/models.py#L636

_Originally posted by @n2ygk in https://github.com/jazzband/django-oauth-toolkit/pull/969#discussion_r782459085_


Discussion:
I was enhancing and running the `clear_expired` tests and noticed that the test was taking .4 sec longer than it should have;-)

Resolving patch:
diff --git a/oauth2_provider/settings.py b/oauth2_provider/settings.py
--- a/oauth2_provider/settings.py
+++ b/oauth2_provider/settings.py
@@ -102,7 +102,7 @@
     # Should only be required in testing.
     "ALWAYS_RELOAD_OAUTHLIB_CORE": False,
     "CLEAR_EXPIRED_TOKENS_BATCH_SIZE": 10000,
-    "CLEAR_EXPIRED_TOKENS_BATCH_INTERVAL": 0.1,
+    "CLEAR_EXPIRED_TOKENS_BATCH_INTERVAL": 0,
 }
 
 # List of settings that cannot be empty


Test patch:
Repository: jazzband/django-oauth-toolkit

Issue:
Release of version 2.0.0
Hello everyone

I would like to know if there is any prediction for the 2.0.0 version to be released. Today it is unrealized in the doc, and has two vulnerability alerts for versions lower than it in the [safety](https://pyup.io/). Thank you!





Discussion:
Where do you see vulnerability alerts for django-oauth-toolkit? I haven't seen any.

Hello,
I found related discussion https://github.com/pyupio/safety-db/issues/2353

In short.. the reason for alert is: https://github.com/pyupio/safety-db/blob/master/data/insecure.json#L1841

And reason for this reason is explained in the discussion above
https://github.com/pyupio/safety-db/issues/2353#issuecomment-1088608992

Thanks for the pointer. 

You can always use a git ref to the prerelease code now. 

Resolving patch:
diff --git a/oauth2_provider/__init__.py b/oauth2_provider/__init__.py
--- a/oauth2_provider/__init__.py
+++ b/oauth2_provider/__init__.py
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 import django
 
 
-__version__ = "1.7.1"
+__version__ = "2.0.0"
 
 if django.VERSION < (3, 2):
     default_app_config = "oauth2_provider.apps.DOTConfig"


Test patch:
Repository: jazzband/django-oauth-toolkit

Issue:
Route "/o/logout" returns 500 Internal Server Error
**Describe the bug**
When the logout request comes from an anonymous user and the ID Token is empty, clicking the Logout button will return 500 Internal Server Error

**To Reproduce**
In the case of not logging in, open "/o/logout" directly, make sure that the parameter id_token_hint is not carried, and then click the "Logout" button to reproduce this problem

**Expected behavior**
I think that when no id_token is provided and it is impossible to confirm which user the request came from, a 400 error should be returned to remind the user that we cannot perform an exit operation for him/her

**Version**
V2.3.0


Discussion:

Resolving patch:
diff --git a/oauth2_provider/views/oidc.py b/oauth2_provider/views/oidc.py
--- a/oauth2_provider/views/oidc.py
+++ b/oauth2_provider/views/oidc.py
@@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
 from urllib.parse import urlparse
 
 from django.contrib.auth import logout
+from django.contrib.auth.models import AnonymousUser
 from django.http import HttpResponse, JsonResponse
 from django.urls import reverse
 from django.utils.decorators import method_decorator
@@ -362,12 +363,13 @@ def form_valid(self, form):
             return self.error_response(error)
 
     def do_logout(self, application=None, post_logout_redirect_uri=None, state=None, token_user=None):
-        # Delete Access Tokens
-        if oauth2_settings.OIDC_RP_INITIATED_LOGOUT_DELETE_TOKENS:
+        user = token_user or self.request.user
+        # Delete Access Tokens if a user was found
+        if oauth2_settings.OIDC_RP_INITIATED_LOGOUT_DELETE_TOKENS and not isinstance(user, AnonymousUser):
             AccessToken = get_access_token_model()
             RefreshToken = get_refresh_token_model()
             access_tokens_to_delete = AccessToken.objects.filter(
-                user=token_user or self.request.user,
+                user=user,
                 application__client_type__in=self.token_deletion_client_types,
                 application__authorization_grant_type__in=self.token_deletion_grant_types,
             )


Test patch:
diff --git a/tests/test_oidc_views.py b/tests/test_oidc_views.py
--- a/tests/test_oidc_views.py
+++ b/tests/test_oidc_views.py
@@ -401,6 +401,15 @@ def test_rp_initiated_logout_post_allowed(logged_in_client, oidc_tokens, rp_sett
     assert not is_logged_in(logged_in_client)
 
 
+@pytest.mark.django_db
+def test_rp_initiated_logout_post_no_session(client, oidc_tokens, rp_settings):
+    form_data = {"client_id": oidc_tokens.application.client_id, "allow": True}
+    rsp = client.post(reverse("oauth2_provider:rp-initiated-logout"), form_data)
+    assert rsp.status_code == 302
+    assert rsp["Location"] == "http://testserver/"
+    assert not is_logged_in(client)
+
+
 @pytest.mark.django_db
 @pytest.mark.oauth2_settings(presets.OIDC_SETTINGS_RP_LOGOUT)
 def test_rp_initiated_logout_expired_tokens_accept(logged_in_client, application, expired_id_token):
Repository: jazzband/django-oauth-toolkit

Issue:
post_logout_redirect_uris introduces breaking change
In [this commit](https://github.com/jazzband/django-oauth-toolkit/commit/11294ab5678691fb6bc21ecf917dca3099311a9e#diff-1ebdc91fdacce3c6c243c059421477ecd84b80bbc0381a1d21b424a66135241fR109) the non-nullable field `post_logout_redirect_uris` is introduced without a default value.
This is a breaking change.

There are two options to fix this problem:
1. Make the field nullable (`null=True`)
2. Set a default value (e.g. `default=""`)

- [x] I have tested with the latest published release and it's still a problem.
- [x] I have tested with the master branch and it's still a problem.


Discussion:
@Qup42 @dopry please take a look at this and submit a PR to make the field nullable with a default.

Resolving patch:
diff --git a/oauth2_provider/migrations/0007_application_post_logout_redirect_uris.py b/oauth2_provider/migrations/0007_application_post_logout_redirect_uris.py
--- a/oauth2_provider/migrations/0007_application_post_logout_redirect_uris.py
+++ b/oauth2_provider/migrations/0007_application_post_logout_redirect_uris.py
@@ -13,6 +13,6 @@ class Migration(migrations.Migration):
         migrations.AddField(
             model_name="application",
             name="post_logout_redirect_uris",
-            field=models.TextField(blank=True, help_text="Allowed Post Logout URIs list, space separated"),
+            field=models.TextField(blank=True, help_text="Allowed Post Logout URIs list, space separated", default=""),
         ),
     ]
diff --git a/oauth2_provider/models.py b/oauth2_provider/models.py
--- a/oauth2_provider/models.py
+++ b/oauth2_provider/models.py
@@ -114,6 +114,7 @@ class AbstractApplication(models.Model):
     post_logout_redirect_uris = models.TextField(
         blank=True,
         help_text=_("Allowed Post Logout URIs list, space separated"),
+        default="",
     )
     client_type = models.CharField(max_length=32, choices=CLIENT_TYPES)
     authorization_grant_type = models.CharField(max_length=32, choices=GRANT_TYPES)


Test patch: