internlm/SWE-Fixer-Train-110K huggingface dataset:
Repository: ansible-collections/community.general

Issue:
Composite variables support for Proxmox nodes in dynamic inventory plugin
### Summary

In my environment Proxmox nodes are assigned an IP address in management VLAN and DNS name in a subdomain of my local domain. Currently if I try to configure the `ansible_host` variable in `compose:` section it will only work for hosts on the Proxmox nodes but not for the nodes themselves.

### Issue Type

Feature Idea

### Component Name

plugins/inventory/proxmox.py

### Additional Information

<!--- Paste example playbooks or commands between quotes below -->
```yaml
plugin: community.general.proxmox
url: https://pve.domain.local:8006
want_facts: false
want_proxmox_nodes_ansible_host: false
compose:
   ansible_host: inventory_hostname + '.domain. Local'
```


### Code of Conduct

- [X] I agree to follow the Ansible Code of Conduct


Discussion:
Files identified in the description:
* `plugins/modules/proxmox`

If these files are incorrect, please update the `component name` section of the description or use the `!component` bot command.

[click here for bot help](https://github.com/ansible/ansibullbot/blob/devel/ISSUE_HELP.md)
<!--- boilerplate: components_banner --->
cc @Ajpantuso @Thulium-Drake @UnderGreen @joshainglis @karmab @tleguern
[click here for bot help](https://github.com/ansible/ansibullbot/blob/devel/ISSUE_HELP.md)
<!--- boilerplate: notify --->
Files identified in the description:
* [`plugins/inventory/proxmox.py`](https://github.com/ansible-collections/community.general/blob/main/plugins/inventory/proxmox.py)

If these files are incorrect, please update the `component name` section of the description or use the `!component` bot command.

[click here for bot help](https://github.com/ansible/ansibullbot/blob/devel/ISSUE_HELP.md)
<!--- boilerplate: components_banner --->
cc @ilijamt
[click here for bot help](https://github.com/ansible/ansibullbot/blob/devel/ISSUE_HELP.md)
<!--- boilerplate: notify --->

Resolving patch:
diff --git a/plugins/inventory/proxmox.py b/plugins/inventory/proxmox.py
--- a/plugins/inventory/proxmox.py
+++ b/plugins/inventory/proxmox.py
@@ -590,6 +590,10 @@ def _populate(self):
                 ip = self._get_node_ip(node['node'])
                 self.inventory.set_variable(node['node'], 'ansible_host', ip)
 
+            # Setting composite variables
+            variables = self.inventory.get_host(node['node']).get_vars()
+            self._set_composite_vars(self.get_option('compose'), variables, node['node'], strict=self.strict)
+
             # add LXC/Qemu groups for the node
             for ittype in ('lxc', 'qemu'):
                 node_type_group = self._group('%s_%s' % (node['node'], ittype))


Test patch:
Repository: ansible-collections/community.general

Issue:
Document whether random_string is cryptographically secure
### Summary

There are two types of random number/string/data generators. There's quick and easy normal ones. And then there's ones which are more robust, for use in cryptography.

The documentation should state whether `random_string` is cryptographically secure.

My guess is that it is not. i.e. it's not strong enough to be used to generate passwords.

However the documentation for `community.aws.secretsmanager_secret` shows `random_string` used to generate a password.

### Issue Type

Documentation Report

### Component Name

random_string

### Ansible Version

N/A

### Community.general Version

N/A

### Configuration

N/A

### OS / Environment

N/A

### Additional Information

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cryptographically_secure_pseudorandom_number_generator

### Code of Conduct

- [X] I agree to follow the Ansible Code of Conduct


Discussion:
Files identified in the description:
* [`plugins/lookup/random_string.py`](https://github.com/ansible-collections/community.general/blob/main/plugins/lookup/random_string.py)

If these files are incorrect, please update the `component name` section of the description or use the `!component` bot command.

[click here for bot help](https://github.com/ansible/ansibullbot/blob/devel/ISSUE_HELP.md)
<!--- boilerplate: components_banner --->
cc @Akasurde
[click here for bot help](https://github.com/ansible/ansibullbot/blob/devel/ISSUE_HELP.md)
<!--- boilerplate: notify --->
The plugin uses https://docs.python.org/3/library/random.html#random.SystemRandom, which uses https://docs.python.org/3/library/os.html#os.urandom - which according to its documentation "should be unpredictable enough for cryptographic applications, though its exact quality depends on the OS implementation".
Thanks.

Can I update the docs to say that?
Sure, just create a PR.

Resolving patch:
diff --git a/plugins/lookup/random_string.py b/plugins/lookup/random_string.py
--- a/plugins/lookup/random_string.py
+++ b/plugins/lookup/random_string.py
@@ -16,6 +16,8 @@
     version_added: '3.2.0'
     description:
       - Generates random string based upon the given constraints.
+      - Uses L(random.SystemRandom,https://docs.python.org/3/library/random.html#random.SystemRandom),
+        so should be strong enough for cryptographic purposes.
     options:
       length:
         description: The length of the string.


Test patch:
Repository: ansible-collections/community.general

Issue:
Error 500 from Gitlab on Group creation
### Summary

When I tried to use the `community.general.gitlab_group module` to create a submodule in Gitlab, I had a 500 as a response.
Looking in Gitlab logs, it seemed that the fields 
-  auto_devops_enabled
-  project_creation_level
-  subgroup_creation_level

were required and Gitlab didn't accept a `null` value for these fields.
After I added them in the Ansible tasks the response was a 201, as expected.

### Issue Type

Bug Report

### Component Name

community.general.gitlab_group module

### Ansible Version

```
ansible [core 2.12.3]
```


### Community.general Version

```console (paste below)
$ ansible-galaxy collection list community.general

```


### Configuration

```console (paste below)
$ ansible-config dump --only-changed

```


### OS / Environment

_No response_

### Steps to Reproduce

Run the module without the fields I reported

### Expected Results

I expected a 201 even without the fields I reported. I had a 500 instead

### Actual Results

```
"msg": "Failed to create group: 500: 500 Internal Server Error "
```


### Code of Conduct

- [X] I agree to follow the Ansible Code of Conduct


Discussion:
I also add that I tried to curl directly Gitlab API without those fields, and the curl was successful
cc @Lunik @Shaps @dj-wasabi @lgatellier @marwatk @metanovii @nejch @scodeman @sh0shin @suukit @waheedi @zanssa
[click here for bot help](https://github.com/ansible/ansibullbot/blob/devel/ISSUE_HELP.md)
<!--- boilerplate: notify --->

Resolving patch:
diff --git a/plugins/modules/gitlab_group.py b/plugins/modules/gitlab_group.py
--- a/plugins/modules/gitlab_group.py
+++ b/plugins/modules/gitlab_group.py
@@ -255,7 +255,10 @@ def create_group(self, arguments):
             return True
 
         try:
-            group = self._gitlab.groups.create(arguments)
+            # Filter out None values
+            filtered = dict((arg_key, arg_value) for arg_key, arg_value in arguments.items() if arg_value is not None)
+
+            group = self._gitlab.groups.create(filtered)
         except (gitlab.exceptions.GitlabCreateError) as e:
             self._module.fail_json(msg="Failed to create group: %s " % to_native(e))
 


Test patch:
Repository: ansible-collections/community.general

Issue:
Document whether random_string is cryptographically secure
### Summary

There are two types of random number/string/data generators. There's quick and easy normal ones. And then there's ones which are more robust, for use in cryptography.

The documentation should state whether `random_string` is cryptographically secure.

My guess is that it is not. i.e. it's not strong enough to be used to generate passwords.

However the documentation for `community.aws.secretsmanager_secret` shows `random_string` used to generate a password.

### Issue Type

Documentation Report

### Component Name

random_string

### Ansible Version

N/A

### Community.general Version

N/A

### Configuration

N/A

### OS / Environment

N/A

### Additional Information

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cryptographically_secure_pseudorandom_number_generator

### Code of Conduct

- [X] I agree to follow the Ansible Code of Conduct


Discussion:
Files identified in the description:
* [`plugins/lookup/random_string.py`](https://github.com/ansible-collections/community.general/blob/main/plugins/lookup/random_string.py)

If these files are incorrect, please update the `component name` section of the description or use the `!component` bot command.

[click here for bot help](https://github.com/ansible/ansibullbot/blob/devel/ISSUE_HELP.md)
<!--- boilerplate: components_banner --->
cc @Akasurde
[click here for bot help](https://github.com/ansible/ansibullbot/blob/devel/ISSUE_HELP.md)
<!--- boilerplate: notify --->
The plugin uses https://docs.python.org/3/library/random.html#random.SystemRandom, which uses https://docs.python.org/3/library/os.html#os.urandom - which according to its documentation "should be unpredictable enough for cryptographic applications, though its exact quality depends on the OS implementation".
Thanks.

Can I update the docs to say that?
Sure, just create a PR.
resolved_by_pr #6691 

Resolving patch:
diff --git a/plugins/lookup/random_string.py b/plugins/lookup/random_string.py
--- a/plugins/lookup/random_string.py
+++ b/plugins/lookup/random_string.py
@@ -16,6 +16,8 @@
     version_added: '3.2.0'
     description:
       - Generates random string based upon the given constraints.
+      - Uses L(random.SystemRandom,https://docs.python.org/3/library/random.html#random.SystemRandom),
+        so should be strong enough for cryptographic purposes.
     options:
       length:
         description: The length of the string.


Test patch:
Repository: ansible-collections/community.general

Issue:
Get processor architecture from Redfish CPU inventory
### Summary

I'm trying to get the processor architecture and this is a field that is not present in the result of redfish_info GetCpuInventory command.

### Issue Type

Feature Idea

### Component Name

redfish_info

### Additional Information

<!--- Paste example playbooks or commands between quotes below -->
```yaml (paste below)

```


### Code of Conduct

- [X] I agree to follow the Ansible Code of Conduct


Discussion:

Resolving patch:
diff --git a/plugins/module_utils/redfish_utils.py b/plugins/module_utils/redfish_utils.py
--- a/plugins/module_utils/redfish_utils.py
+++ b/plugins/module_utils/redfish_utils.py
@@ -2287,7 +2287,7 @@ def get_cpu_inventory(self, systems_uri):
         key = "Processors"
         # Get these entries, but does not fail if not found
         properties = ['Id', 'Name', 'Manufacturer', 'Model', 'MaxSpeedMHz',
-                      'TotalCores', 'TotalThreads', 'Status']
+                      'ProcessorArchitecture', 'TotalCores', 'TotalThreads', 'Status']
 
         # Search for 'key' entry and extract URI from it
         response = self.get_request(self.root_uri + systems_uri)


Test patch:
Repository: ansible-collections/community.general

Issue:
machinectl become plugin does not specify it requires a tty
### Summary

see https://github.com/ansible/ansible/issues/81254

if the plugin sets the class attribute:

```
 require_tty = True
```

It would automatically disable pipelining and avoid such errors

### Issue Type

Bug Report

### Component Name

become/machinectl

### Ansible Version

```console (paste below)
$ ansible --version

```
all

### Community.general Version

```console (paste below)
$ ansible-galaxy collection list community.general

```
all

### Configuration

```console (paste below)
$ ansible-config dump --only-changed

```
N/A

### OS / Environment

N/A

### Steps to Reproduce

<!--- Paste example playbooks or commands between quotes below -->
```yaml (paste below)

```
Use machinectl become plugin + pipelining

### Expected Results

it works TM

### Actual Results

```console (paste below)
   "msg": "MODULE FAILURE\nSee stdout/stderr for the exact error",
```


### Code of Conduct

- [X] I agree to follow the Ansible Code of Conduct


Discussion:
Files identified in the description:
* [`plugins/become/machinectl.py`](https://github.com/ansible-collections/community.general/blob/main/plugins/become/machinectl.py)

If these files are incorrect, please update the `component name` section of the description or use the `!component` bot command.

[click here for bot help](https://github.com/ansible/ansibullbot/blob/devel/ISSUE_HELP.md)
<!--- boilerplate: components_banner --->
cc @None
[click here for bot help](https://github.com/ansible/ansibullbot/blob/devel/ISSUE_HELP.md)
<!--- boilerplate: notify --->

Resolving patch:
diff --git a/plugins/become/machinectl.py b/plugins/become/machinectl.py
--- a/plugins/become/machinectl.py
+++ b/plugins/become/machinectl.py
@@ -102,6 +102,7 @@ class BecomeModule(BecomeBase):
     prompt = 'Password: '
     fail = ('==== AUTHENTICATION FAILED ====',)
     success = ('==== AUTHENTICATION COMPLETE ====',)
+    require_tty = True  # see https://github.com/ansible-collections/community.general/issues/6932
 
     @staticmethod
     def remove_ansi_codes(line):


Test patch:
Repository: ansible-collections/community.general

Issue:
Documentation is incorrect for proxmox_kvm for boot order
### Summary

When I specify `boot` as `c` to boot from a drive as described in the [documentation](https://github.com/ansible-collections/community.general/blob/87053e52661efdbe7ac08099d92fcaea1943621c/plugins/modules/proxmox_kvm.py#L66), no changes to boot order occur.

### Issue Type

Bug Report

### Component Name

proxmox_kvm

### Ansible Version

```console (paste below)
$ ansible --version
ansible [core 2.14.1]
  config file = /mnt/hgfs/step1.2/ansible.cfg
  configured module search path = ['/home/lungj/.ansible/plugins/modules', '/usr/share/ansible/plugins/modules']
  ansible python module location = /home/lungj/.local/lib/python3.9/site-packages/ansible
  ansible collection location = /home/lungj/.ansible/collections:/usr/share/ansible/collections
  executable location = /home/lungj/.local/bin/ansible
  python version = 3.9.2 (default, Feb 28 2021, 17:03:44) [GCC 10.2.1 20210110] (/usr/bin/python3)
  jinja version = 3.1.2
  libyaml = True
```


### Community.general Version

```console (paste below)
$ ansible-galaxy collection list community.general

# /home/lungj/.ansible/collections/ansible_collections
Collection        Version
----------------- -------
community.general 7.3.0  

# /home/lungj/.local/lib/python3.9/site-packages/ansible_collections
Collection        Version
----------------- -------
community.general 6.1.0  
```


### Configuration

```console (paste below)
$ ansible-config dump --only-changed

```


### OS / Environment

Debian 11 connecting to Proxmox VE 8.

### Steps to Reproduce

<!--- Paste example playbooks or commands between quotes below -->
```yaml
- name: "Set boot to drive"
  community.general.proxmox_kvm:
    api_user: SOME_USER
    api_token_id: SOME_TOKEN_ID
    api_token_secret: SOME_SECRE
    api_host: SOME_HOST
    node: SOME_NODE
    
    name: SOME_TEMPLATE_NAME
    boot: "c"
    update: yes
```


### Expected Results

I expect the (virtual) internal drives to be selected for booting.

### Actual Results

No change to VM configuration.

### Code of Conduct

- [X] I agree to follow the Ansible Code of Conduct


Discussion:

Resolving patch:
diff --git a/plugins/modules/proxmox_kvm.py b/plugins/modules/proxmox_kvm.py
--- a/plugins/modules/proxmox_kvm.py
+++ b/plugins/modules/proxmox_kvm.py
@@ -64,6 +64,7 @@
   boot:
     description:
       - Specify the boot order -> boot on floppy V(a), hard disk V(c), CD-ROM V(d), or network V(n).
+      - For newer versions of Proxmox VE, use a boot order like V(order=scsi0;net0;hostpci0).
       - You can combine to set order.
       - This option has no default unless O(proxmox_default_behavior) is set to V(compatiblity); then the default is V(cnd).
     type: str


Test patch:
Repository: ansible-collections/community.general

Issue:
wrong module name in example for community.general.keycloak_clientscope_type
### Summary

Module community.general.keycloak_clientscope_type example all refers to community.general.keycloak_clientsecret_info by mistake instead of community.general.keycloak_clientscope_type

So, juste copy/pasting examples leads to _Unsupported parameters_ error. 

### Issue Type

Documentation Report

### Component Name

community.general.keycloak_clientscope_type

### Ansible Version

```console (paste below)
$ ansible --version

```


### Community.general Version

```console (paste below)
$ ansible-galaxy collection list community.general
Collection        Version
----------------- -------
community.general 7.3.0  
```


### Configuration

```console (paste below)
$ ansible-config dump --only-changed

```


### OS / Environment

opensuse Leap 15

### Additional Information

_No response_

### Code of Conduct

- [X] I agree to follow the Ansible Code of Conduct


Discussion:
Files identified in the description:
* [`plugins/modules/keycloak_clientscope_type.py`](https://github.com/ansible-collections/community.general/blob/main/plugins/modules/keycloak_clientscope_type.py)

If these files are incorrect, please update the `component name` section of the description or use the `!component` bot command.

[click here for bot help](https://github.com/ansible/ansibullbot/blob/devel/ISSUE_HELP.md)
<!--- boilerplate: components_banner --->
cc @eikef @mattock @ndclt @simonpahl
[click here for bot help](https://github.com/ansible/ansibullbot/blob/devel/ISSUE_HELP.md)
<!--- boilerplate: notify --->

Resolving patch:
diff --git a/plugins/modules/keycloak_clientscope_type.py b/plugins/modules/keycloak_clientscope_type.py
--- a/plugins/modules/keycloak_clientscope_type.py
+++ b/plugins/modules/keycloak_clientscope_type.py
@@ -67,7 +67,7 @@
 
 EXAMPLES = '''
 - name: Set default client scopes on realm level
-  community.general.keycloak_clientsecret_info:
+  community.general.keycloak_clientscope_type:
     auth_client_id: admin-cli
     auth_keycloak_url: https://auth.example.com/auth
     auth_realm: master
@@ -79,7 +79,7 @@
 
 
 - name: Set default and optional client scopes on client level with token auth
-  community.general.keycloak_clientsecret_info:
+  community.general.keycloak_clientscope_type:
     auth_client_id: admin-cli
     auth_keycloak_url: https://auth.example.com/auth
     token: TOKEN


Test patch:
Repository: ansible-collections/community.general

Issue:
wrong module name in example for community.general.keycloak_clientscope_type
### Summary

Module community.general.keycloak_clientscope_type example all refers to community.general.keycloak_clientsecret_info by mistake instead of community.general.keycloak_clientscope_type

So, juste copy/pasting examples leads to _Unsupported parameters_ error. 

### Issue Type

Documentation Report

### Component Name

community.general.keycloak_clientscope_type

### Ansible Version

```console (paste below)
$ ansible --version

```


### Community.general Version

```console (paste below)
$ ansible-galaxy collection list community.general
Collection        Version
----------------- -------
community.general 7.3.0  
```


### Configuration

```console (paste below)
$ ansible-config dump --only-changed

```


### OS / Environment

opensuse Leap 15

### Additional Information

_No response_

### Code of Conduct

- [X] I agree to follow the Ansible Code of Conduct


Discussion:
Files identified in the description:
* [`plugins/modules/keycloak_clientscope_type.py`](https://github.com/ansible-collections/community.general/blob/main/plugins/modules/keycloak_clientscope_type.py)

If these files are incorrect, please update the `component name` section of the description or use the `!component` bot command.

[click here for bot help](https://github.com/ansible/ansibullbot/blob/devel/ISSUE_HELP.md)
<!--- boilerplate: components_banner --->
cc @eikef @mattock @ndclt @simonpahl
[click here for bot help](https://github.com/ansible/ansibullbot/blob/devel/ISSUE_HELP.md)
<!--- boilerplate: notify --->
hi @digitalfox , merci pour le report :-)

The PR has just been submitted for it and it should be merged soon.

Resolving patch:
diff --git a/plugins/modules/keycloak_clientscope_type.py b/plugins/modules/keycloak_clientscope_type.py
--- a/plugins/modules/keycloak_clientscope_type.py
+++ b/plugins/modules/keycloak_clientscope_type.py
@@ -67,7 +67,7 @@
 
 EXAMPLES = '''
 - name: Set default client scopes on realm level
-  community.general.keycloak_clientsecret_info:
+  community.general.keycloak_clientscope_type:
     auth_client_id: admin-cli
     auth_keycloak_url: https://auth.example.com/auth
     auth_realm: master
@@ -79,7 +79,7 @@
 
 
 - name: Set default and optional client scopes on client level with token auth
-  community.general.keycloak_clientsecret_info:
+  community.general.keycloak_clientscope_type:
     auth_client_id: admin-cli
     auth_keycloak_url: https://auth.example.com/auth
     token: TOKEN


Test patch:
Repository: ansible-collections/community.general

Issue:
icinga2_host - ip should not be required
### Summary

Hi all,
as one can see in https://icinga.com/docs/icinga-2/latest/doc/09-object-types/#host the address variable is not mandatory, so IP should be optional in the plugin, too.


### Issue Type

Bug Report

### Component Name

icinga2_host

### Ansible Version

```console (paste below)
$ ansible --version
2.11.4
```


### Community.general Version

```console (paste below)
$ ansible-galaxy collection list community.general
5.5.0
```


### Configuration

```console (paste below)

```


### OS / Environment

Ubuntu 22.04

### Steps to Reproduce
Try to create a host without given an IP


### Expected Results

Address is optionally

### Actual Results

Address is mandatory



### Code of Conduct

- [X] I agree to follow the Ansible Code of Conduct


Discussion:
Files identified in the description:
* [`plugins/modules/monitoring/icinga2_host.py`](https://github.com/ansible-collections/community.general/blob/main/plugins/modules/monitoring/icinga2_host.py)

If these files are incorrect, please update the `component name` section of the description or use the `!component` bot command.

[click here for bot help](https://github.com/ansible/ansibullbot/blob/devel/ISSUE_HELP.md)
<!--- boilerplate: components_banner --->
cc @t794104
[click here for bot help](https://github.com/ansible/ansibullbot/blob/devel/ISSUE_HELP.md)
<!--- boilerplate: notify --->
Hi @MarcusCaepio thanks for submitting this issue. Would you be willing to submit a PR to fix that? It seems to be somewhat small a patch. We would be more than happy to help you through. 
Files identified in the description:
* [`plugins/modules/icinga2_host.py`](https://github.com/ansible-collections/community.general/blob/main/plugins/modules/icinga2_host.py)

If these files are incorrect, please update the `component name` section of the description or use the `!component` bot command.

[click here for bot help](https://github.com/ansible/ansibullbot/blob/devel/ISSUE_HELP.md)
<!--- boilerplate: components_banner --->

Resolving patch:
diff --git a/plugins/modules/icinga2_host.py b/plugins/modules/icinga2_host.py
--- a/plugins/modules/icinga2_host.py
+++ b/plugins/modules/icinga2_host.py
@@ -106,7 +106,7 @@
     type: str
     description:
       - The IP address of the host.
-    required: true
+      - This is no longer required since community.general 8.0.0.
   variables:
     type: dict
     description:
@@ -243,7 +243,7 @@ def main():
         template=dict(default=None),
         check_command=dict(default="hostalive"),
         display_name=dict(default=None),
-        ip=dict(required=True),
+        ip=dict(),
         variables=dict(type='dict', default=None),
     )
 


Test patch: