internlm/SWE-Fixer-Train-110K huggingface dataset:
Repository: cookiecutter/cookiecutter-django

Issue:
changed STATIC_URL and MEDIA_URL to fix errors with Compress
[//]: # (Thank you for helping us out: your efforts mean great deal to the project and the community as a whole!)

[//]: # (Before you proceed:)

[//]: # (1. Make sure to add yourself to `CONTRIBUTORS.rst` through this PR provided you're contributing here for the first time)
[//]: # (2. Don't forget to update the `docs/` presuming others would benefit from a concise description of whatever that you're proposing)


## Description

[//]: # (What's it you're proposing?)




## Rationale

[//]: # (Why does the project need that?)




## Use case(s) / visualization(s)

[//]: # ("Better to see something once than to hear about it a thousand times.")





Discussion:
Any explanation why this works and why the former wasn't working?
Django compress searches for files at STATIC_URL = f'https: // {AWS_STORAGE_BUCKET_NAME} .s3.amazonaws.com / static / ', but the default path was specified f'https: //s3.amazonaws.com/ {AWS_STORAGE_BUCKET_NAME} / static /

I deployed the project with these settings to the staging server and I managed to solve the problem this way.
Take this PR.
I still have a few commits to improve.

Resolving patch:
diff --git a/{{cookiecutter.project_slug}}/config/settings/production.py b/{{cookiecutter.project_slug}}/config/settings/production.py
--- a/{{cookiecutter.project_slug}}/config/settings/production.py
+++ b/{{cookiecutter.project_slug}}/config/settings/production.py
@@ -87,14 +87,14 @@
 STATICFILES_STORAGE = 'whitenoise.storage.CompressedManifestStaticFilesStorage'
 {%- else %}
 STATICFILES_STORAGE = 'config.settings.production.StaticRootS3Boto3Storage'
-STATIC_URL = f'https://s3.amazonaws.com/{AWS_STORAGE_BUCKET_NAME}/static/'
+STATIC_URL = f'https://{AWS_STORAGE_BUCKET_NAME}.s3.amazonaws.com/static/'
 {%- endif %}
 
 # MEDIA
 # ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 {% if cookiecutter.use_whitenoise == 'y' -%}
 DEFAULT_FILE_STORAGE = 'storages.backends.s3boto3.S3Boto3Storage'
-MEDIA_URL = f'https://s3.amazonaws.com/{AWS_STORAGE_BUCKET_NAME}/'
+MEDIA_URL = f'https://{AWS_STORAGE_BUCKET_NAME}.s3.amazonaws.com/'
 {%- else %}
 # region http://stackoverflow.com/questions/10390244/
 # Full-fledge class: https://stackoverflow.com/a/18046120/104731
@@ -112,7 +112,7 @@ class MediaRootS3Boto3Storage(S3Boto3Storage):
 
 # endregion
 DEFAULT_FILE_STORAGE = 'config.settings.production.MediaRootS3Boto3Storage'
-MEDIA_URL = f'https://s3.amazonaws.com/{AWS_STORAGE_BUCKET_NAME}/media/'
+MEDIA_URL = f'https://{AWS_STORAGE_BUCKET_NAME}.s3.amazonaws.com/media/'
 {%- endif %}
 
 # TEMPLATES


Test patch:
Repository: cookiecutter/cookiecutter-django

Issue:
Some SECRET_KEY default values cause recursion error in environ.py
This SECRET_KEY declaration causes a maximum recursion depth exceeded error. (Note: I never used this secret key value anywhere since I was just starting the project)

```
SECRET_KEY = env("DJANGO_SECRET_KEY", default='$%ify^q7jg*o7(5me*g%+ae-7_1iy)gey*#eo%3c##-=1d=6mb')
```

Results in:

```
...snip...
  File "/Users/chromakey/.virtualenvs/xxxx/lib/python3.4/site-packages/environ/environ.py", line 260, in get_value
    value = self.get_value(value, cast=cast, default=default)
  File "/Users/chromakey/.virtualenvs/xxxx/lib/python3.4/site-packages/environ/environ.py", line 260, in get_value
    value = self.get_value(value, cast=cast, default=default)
  File "/Users/chromakey/.virtualenvs/xxxx/lib/python3.4/site-packages/environ/environ.py", line 249, in get_value
    value = os.environ[var]
  File "/Users/chromakey/.virtualenvs/xxxx/bin/../lib/python3.4/os.py", line 630, in __getitem__
    value = self._data[self.encodekey(key)]
RuntimeError: maximum recursion depth exceeded
```

This however, causes no error:

```
SECRET_KEY = env("DJANGO_SECRET_KEY", default='12345')
```

I am using the 1.8.7 release since I'll need LTS.  I'm not blocked since I can just change the secret key value, but thought I'd let you know.  Thanks for all of your hard work!



Discussion:
It looks like it's the fact that it starts with $ is what's breaking it.

Shouldn't this be filed under django-environ?

I reckon you're right.  I'll post it there.

Seems like this is still an issue: https://travis-ci.org/pydanny/cookiecutter-django/jobs/216695020
And here https://travis-ci.org/pydanny/cookiecutter-django/jobs/207931982 and here https://travis-ci.org/pydanny/cookiecutter-django/jobs/206205275.

Here is the bug @chromakey opened: https://travis-ci.org/pydanny/cookiecutter-django/jobs/206205275

Should we look for a library that isn't limited in such a way that it doesn't support environment variables with a `$` sign? This isn't such a big problem with a secret key we set on our own, but what about credentials from a 3rd party we can't change?


For reference, here is the bug in django-environ: https://github.com/joke2k/django-environ/issues/60

Resolving patch:
diff --git a/hooks/post_gen_project.py b/hooks/post_gen_project.py
--- a/hooks/post_gen_project.py
+++ b/hooks/post_gen_project.py
@@ -118,9 +118,11 @@ def generate_random_string(
     if using_ascii_letters:
         symbols += string.ascii_letters
     if using_punctuation:
-        symbols += string.punctuation.replace('"', "").replace("'", "").replace(
-            "\\", ""
-        )
+        all_punctuation = set(string.punctuation)
+        # These symbols can cause issues in environment variables
+        unsuitable = {"'", '"', "\\", "$"}
+        suitable = all_punctuation.difference(unsuitable)
+        symbols += "".join(suitable)
     return "".join([random.choice(symbols) for _ in range(length)])
 
 


Test patch:
Repository: cookiecutter/cookiecutter-django

Issue:
Creating a new project with TravisCI support fails first build.
## What happened?
Creating a new project with travisci enabled will fail on its first run



## What should've happened instead?
It should pass



## Steps to reproduce

1. Create new project using this cookie cutter template. 
2. Enable travisci and run build.
3. Build fails due to `requirements.txt` not existing in root directory



Discussion:
Specific flow

```|20:12:34|colemackenzie@Coles-MBP:[cmput401]> cookiecutter https://github.com/pydanny/cookiecutter-django
You've downloaded /Users/colemackenzie/.cookiecutters/cookiecutter-django before. Is it okay to delete and re-download it? [yes]: y
project_name [My Awesome Project]: 
project_slug [some_project]: 
description [Behold My Awesome Project!]: 
author_name [Daniel Roy Greenfeld]: 
domain_name [example.com]: 
email [team@example.com]: 
version [0.1.0]:
Select open_source_license:
1 - MIT
2 - BSD
3 - GPLv3
4 - Apache Software License 2.0
5 - Not open source
Choose from 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 (1, 2, 3, 4, 5) [1]: 5
timezone [UTC]:
windows [n]: y
use_pycharm [n]: y
use_docker [n]: n
Select postgresql_version:
1 - 10.4
2 - 10.3
3 - 10.2
4 - 10.1
5 - 9.6
6 - 9.5
7 - 9.4
8 - 9.3
Choose from 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8) [1]:
Select js_task_runner:
1 - None
2 - Gulp
Choose from 1, 2 (1, 2) [1]: 1
custom_bootstrap_compilation [n]:
use_compressor [n]:
use_celery [n]:
use_mailhog [n]:
use_sentry [n]:
use_whitenoise [n]:
use_heroku [n]:
use_travisci [n]: y
keep_local_envs_in_vcs [y]: n
debug [n]:
```
It looks as if you disable heroku, but enable travisci, the requirements.txt file is not generated in the root dir.
I propose removing `requirements.txt` from the following line https://github.com/pydanny/cookiecutter-django/blob/master/hooks/post_gen_project.py#L72

Resolving patch:
diff --git a/hooks/post_gen_project.py b/hooks/post_gen_project.py
--- a/hooks/post_gen_project.py
+++ b/hooks/post_gen_project.py
@@ -71,6 +71,9 @@ def remove_utility_files():
 def remove_heroku_files():
     file_names = ["Procfile", "runtime.txt", "requirements.txt"]
     for file_name in file_names:
+        if file_name == "requirements.txt" and "{{ cookiecutter.use_travisci }}".lower() == "y":
+            # don't remove the file if we are using travisci but not using heroku
+            continue
         os.remove(file_name)
 
 


Test patch:
Repository: cookiecutter/cookiecutter-django

Issue:
Celery: app.config_from_object() should be called immediately and not wait for CeleryAppConfig being ready
## What happened?

The current celery implementation configs the celery app from django settings after the CeleryAppConfig being ready.
```
app = Celery('{{cookiecutter.project_slug}}')


class CeleryAppConfig(AppConfig):
    name = '{{cookiecutter.project_slug}}.taskapp'
    verbose_name = 'Celery Config'

    def ready(self):
        # Using a string here means the worker will not have to
        # pickle the object when using Windows.
        # - namespace='CELERY' means all celery-related configuration keys
        #   should have a `CELERY_` prefix.
        app.config_from_object('django.conf:settings', namespace='CELERY')
        installed_apps = [app_config.name for app_config in apps.get_app_configs()]
        app.autodiscover_tasks(lambda: installed_apps, force=True)

```
In one project, I set the `CELERYD_CONCURRENCY` in the django settings file, however it it does not work. The reason is that when celery worker retrieves configs, the celery app is not configured yet.(https://github.com/celery/celery/blob/master/celery/bin/worker.py#L287)

The current behavior is different from the celery django [tutorial](http://docs.celeryproject.org/en/latest/django/first-steps-with-django.html). People usually assume configs in django settings and in a separate conf fiel are equivalent, but they are not now.

## What should've happened instead?
The current behavior was introduced in 9bfca28f6f34affa74b950d46e7c821ace6034d4.  It did not explain why `app.config_from_object` should be put inside the ready block. Based on my own experience, I believe it is OK to config the app after the app being created immediately.




Discussion:

Resolving patch:
diff --git a/{{cookiecutter.project_slug}}/{{cookiecutter.project_slug}}/taskapp/celery.py b/{{cookiecutter.project_slug}}/{{cookiecutter.project_slug}}/taskapp/celery.py
--- a/{{cookiecutter.project_slug}}/{{cookiecutter.project_slug}}/taskapp/celery.py
+++ b/{{cookiecutter.project_slug}}/{{cookiecutter.project_slug}}/taskapp/celery.py
@@ -11,6 +11,11 @@
 
 
 app = Celery('{{cookiecutter.project_slug}}')
+# Using a string here means the worker will not have to
+# pickle the object when using Windows.
+# - namespace='CELERY' means all celery-related configuration keys
+#   should have a `CELERY_` prefix.
+app.config_from_object('django.conf:settings', namespace='CELERY')
 
 
 class CeleryAppConfig(AppConfig):
@@ -18,11 +23,6 @@ class CeleryAppConfig(AppConfig):
     verbose_name = 'Celery Config'
 
     def ready(self):
-        # Using a string here means the worker will not have to
-        # pickle the object when using Windows.
-        # - namespace='CELERY' means all celery-related configuration keys
-        #   should have a `CELERY_` prefix.
-        app.config_from_object('django.conf:settings', namespace='CELERY')
         installed_apps = [app_config.name for app_config in apps.get_app_configs()]
         app.autodiscover_tasks(lambda: installed_apps, force=True)
 


Test patch:
Repository: cookiecutter/cookiecutter-django

Issue:
Upgrading to Django 2.1
Things to keep in mind:

* 
[UserCreationForm and UserChangeForm no longer need to be rewritten for a custom user model](https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/releases/2.1/#django-contrib-auth) (I believe, this has already been pointed out by some around here but could find any mention though...)
 See https://github.com/pydanny/cookiecutter-django/issues/1654#issuecomment-484585482 for context.
* [Dropped support for PostgreSQL 9.3](https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/releases/2.1/#dropped-support-for-postgresql-9-3).
* [Removed BCryptPasswordHasher from the default PASSWORD_HASHERS setting](https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/releases/2.1/#removed-bcryptpasswordhasher-from-the-default-password-hashers-setting): maybe we should remove it from `PASSWORD_HASHERS` all together?


Discussion:
Is anyone running cookiecutter-django with Django 2.1? Is it safe to upgrade?
@jhancia I've been successfully using it on my production-grade projects. The only thing you'd need to change is the layout of `UserAdmin`, for instance, this is what mine looks like:

```python
@admin.register(User)
class UserAdmin(auth_admin.UserAdmin):
    fieldsets = (
        (_("Personal info"), {"fields": ("email",)}),
        (
            _("Permissions"),
            {
                "fields": (
                    "is_active",
                    "is_staff",
                    "is_superuser",
                    "groups",
                    "user_permissions",
                )
            },
        ),
        (_("Important dates"), {"fields": ("last_login", "date_joined")}),
    )
    add_fieldsets = (
        (None, {"classes": ("wide",), "fields": ("email", "password1", "password2")}),
    )
    form = UserChangeForm
    add_form = UserCreationForm
    list_display = ["email", "is_active", "is_staff", "is_superuser", "date_joined"]
    list_filter = ["groups", "is_active", "is_staff", "is_superuser"]
    search_fields = ["email"]
    ordering = ["-date_joined"]
```

Also, you might wanna check out if `UserChangeForm` and `UserCreationForm` are still necessary (I can't find them being mentioned in the current dev docs for some reason...)
@webyneter  thank you so much this solution helped me a lot

Resolving patch:
diff --git a/{{cookiecutter.project_slug}}/config/settings/base.py b/{{cookiecutter.project_slug}}/config/settings/base.py
--- a/{{cookiecutter.project_slug}}/config/settings/base.py
+++ b/{{cookiecutter.project_slug}}/config/settings/base.py
@@ -109,7 +109,6 @@
     "django.contrib.auth.hashers.PBKDF2PasswordHasher",
     "django.contrib.auth.hashers.PBKDF2SHA1PasswordHasher",
     "django.contrib.auth.hashers.BCryptSHA256PasswordHasher",
-    "django.contrib.auth.hashers.BCryptPasswordHasher",
 ]
 # https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/ref/settings/#auth-password-validators
 AUTH_PASSWORD_VALIDATORS = [


Test patch:
Repository: cookiecutter/cookiecutter-django

Issue:
Logging improvements
Currently, if you do not opt for the Sentry Logging, the logging ist very basic and not production ready. Morever, this basic logging is only enabled for production, but not for dev. The the log file destination should also be controllable via environment variable-
 


Discussion:
Any suggestions, @schacki?
Agreed, I'd like to see that. a better logging setup would have helped with #1705, where the logs were not saying much.

Resolving patch:
diff --git a/{{cookiecutter.project_slug}}/config/settings/base.py b/{{cookiecutter.project_slug}}/config/settings/base.py
--- a/{{cookiecutter.project_slug}}/config/settings/base.py
+++ b/{{cookiecutter.project_slug}}/config/settings/base.py
@@ -221,6 +221,30 @@
 # https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/ref/settings/#managers
 MANAGERS = ADMINS
 
+# LOGGING
+# ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
+# https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/ref/settings/#logging
+# See https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/topics/logging for
+# more details on how to customize your logging configuration.
+LOGGING = {
+    "version": 1,
+    "disable_existing_loggers": False,
+    "formatters": {
+        "verbose": {
+            "format": "%(levelname)s %(asctime)s %(module)s "
+            "%(process)d %(thread)d %(message)s"
+        }
+    },
+    "handlers": {
+        "console": {
+            "level": "DEBUG",
+            "class": "logging.StreamHandler",
+            "formatter": "verbose",
+        }
+    },
+    "root": {"level": "INFO", "handlers": ["console"]},
+}
+
 {% if cookiecutter.use_celery == 'y' -%}
 # Celery
 # ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
diff --git a/{{cookiecutter.project_slug}}/config/settings/production.py b/{{cookiecutter.project_slug}}/config/settings/production.py
--- a/{{cookiecutter.project_slug}}/config/settings/production.py
+++ b/{{cookiecutter.project_slug}}/config/settings/production.py
@@ -233,6 +233,7 @@ class MediaRootS3Boto3Storage(S3Boto3Storage):
             "formatter": "verbose",
         },
     },
+    "root": {"level": "INFO", "handlers": ["console"]},
     "loggers": {
         "django.request": {
             "handlers": ["mail_admins"],
@@ -263,6 +264,7 @@ class MediaRootS3Boto3Storage(S3Boto3Storage):
             "formatter": "verbose",
         }
     },
+    "root": {"level": "INFO", "handlers": ["console"]},
     "loggers": {
         "django.db.backends": {
             "level": "ERROR",


Test patch:
Repository: cookiecutter/cookiecutter-django

Issue:
Updating the latest Django 2.2.x version
Django 2.2 has been published, so you can not directly change your Django 2.2 script directly


Discussion:
Are there known blockers against updating to 2.2.1? 

EDIT: #1654 is about updating to 2.1

Resolving patch:
diff --git a/setup.py b/setup.py
--- a/setup.py
+++ b/setup.py
@@ -10,10 +10,10 @@
 
 # Our version ALWAYS matches the version of Django we support
 # If Django has a new release, we branch, tag, then update this setting after the tag.
-version = "2.1.8-01"
+version = "2.2.1"
 
 if sys.argv[-1] == "tag":
-    os.system('git tag -a %s -m "version %s"' % (version, version))
+    os.system(f'git tag -a {version} -m "version {version}"')
     os.system("git push --tags")
     sys.exit()
 
@@ -34,7 +34,7 @@
     classifiers=[
         "Development Status :: 4 - Beta",
         "Environment :: Console",
-        "Framework :: Django :: 2.0",
+        "Framework :: Django :: 2.2",
         "Intended Audience :: Developers",
         "Natural Language :: English",
         "License :: OSI Approved :: BSD License",


Test patch:
Repository: cookiecutter/cookiecutter-django

Issue:
Python 3.7 support
## Description

Python 3.7 has been out for quite a while now. Celery was a blocker to upgrade for a little while, bit it should be supported in the version that we use.

It's time to update this project to use Python 3.7 by default.

## Use case(s) / visualization(s)

It should be fairly straightforward with Docker, but there is also a couple of files with Heroku, Travis and the documentation. The things I see so far:

- Bump versions in various Dockerfile
- Update tox file to use 3.7
- Update `.travis.yml` file to use 3.7 in both the template project and the template content under `{{cookiecutter.project_slug}}`
- Update `runtime.txt` to use latests 3.7 on Heroku
- Update mypy settings in `setup.cfg`
- Update documentation


Discussion:
Hi! Can i take this?
Sure! 
:ok_hand: 

Resolving patch:
diff --git a/hooks/pre_gen_project.py b/hooks/pre_gen_project.py
--- a/hooks/pre_gen_project.py
+++ b/hooks/pre_gen_project.py
@@ -35,7 +35,7 @@
     if python_major_version == 2:
         print(
             WARNING + "You're running cookiecutter under Python 2, but the generated "
-            "project requires Python 3.6+. Do you want to proceed (y/n)? " + TERMINATOR
+            "project requires Python 3.7+. Do you want to proceed (y/n)? " + TERMINATOR
         )
         yes_options, no_options = frozenset(["y"]), frozenset(["n"])
         while True:
diff --git a/setup.py b/setup.py
--- a/setup.py
+++ b/setup.py
@@ -40,7 +40,7 @@
         "License :: OSI Approved :: BSD License",
         "Programming Language :: Python",
         "Programming Language :: Python :: 3",
-        "Programming Language :: Python :: 3.6",
+        "Programming Language :: Python :: 3.7",
         "Programming Language :: Python :: Implementation :: CPython",
         "Topic :: Software Development",
     ],


Test patch:
Repository: cookiecutter/cookiecutter-django

Issue:
Broken static files with whitenoise=n & cloud_provider=none
## What happened?

If the user chooses `use_whitenoise=n` & `cloud_provider=None`, then the static files are not served properly.

## What should've happened instead?

This combination should not be allowed and show an error when trying to generate the project.



Discussion:
To fix that, I think we should implement a check in one of the hooks, show an error to the user and not generate anything. 

The tests will need to be updated to:

1. Cover only the working combination in the main fixture:

   https://github.com/pydanny/cookiecutter-django/blob/63453b6e51faae64c872059cb4d90dd38d4b8865/tests/test_cookiecutter_generation.py#L39-L40

2. Add a new test to make sure the project isn't generated when the invalid combination is selected.

More details about cookiecutter's hook mechanism: https://cookiecutter.readthedocs.io/en/latest/advanced/hooks.html#writing-hooks
@browniebroke I'll be working on this one as well

Resolving patch:
diff --git a/hooks/pre_gen_project.py b/hooks/pre_gen_project.py
--- a/hooks/pre_gen_project.py
+++ b/hooks/pre_gen_project.py
@@ -59,3 +59,12 @@
                     )
                     + TERMINATOR
                 )
+
+if (
+    "{{ cookiecutter.use_whitenoise }}".lower() == "n"
+    and "{{ cookiecutter.cloud_provider }}" == "None"
+):
+    print(
+        "You should either use Whitenoise or select a Cloud Provider to serve static files"
+    )
+    sys.exit(1)


Test patch:
diff --git a/tests/test_cookiecutter_generation.py b/tests/test_cookiecutter_generation.py
--- a/tests/test_cookiecutter_generation.py
+++ b/tests/test_cookiecutter_generation.py
@@ -49,6 +49,11 @@ def context_combination(
     cloud_provider,
 ):
     """Fixture that parametrize the function where it's used."""
+    if cloud_provider == "None":
+        # Either of the two should be set for serving static files, so if cloud provider
+        # is not set, we force Whitenoise to be set
+        use_whitenoise = "y"
+
     return {
         "windows": windows,
         "use_docker": use_docker,
@@ -157,3 +162,12 @@ def test_invalid_slug(cookies, context, slug):
 
     assert result.exit_code != 0
     assert isinstance(result.exception, FailedHookException)
+
+
+def test_no_whitenoise_and_no_cloud_provider(cookies, context):
+    """It should not generate project if neither whitenoise or cloud provider are set"""
+    context.update({"use_whitenoise": "n", "cloud_provider": "None"})
+    result = cookies.bake(extra_context=context)
+
+    assert result.exit_code != 0
+    assert isinstance(result.exception, FailedHookException)
Repository: cookiecutter/cookiecutter-django

Issue:
AWS service definition should be conditional to cloud provider
## What happened?
**awscli** service definition is present in the docker-compose **production.yml** file even though the **Select cloud_provider** question was answered with **None**. The same goes for **compose/production/aws** directory.

## What should've happened instead?
The **production.yml** should not have any definition about the AWS service. Also there should not be a **compose/production/aws** directory.

## Steps to reproduce
Generate a new project and choose **None** to the question **Select cloud_provider**.




Discussion:

Resolving patch:
diff --git a/hooks/post_gen_project.py b/hooks/post_gen_project.py
--- a/hooks/post_gen_project.py
+++ b/hooks/post_gen_project.py
@@ -279,6 +279,10 @@ def remove_node_dockerfile():
     shutil.rmtree(os.path.join("compose", "local", "node"))
 
 
+def remove_aws_dockerfile():
+    shutil.rmtree(os.path.join("compose", "production", "aws"))
+
+
 def main():
     debug = "{{ cookiecutter.debug }}".lower() == "y"
 
@@ -302,6 +306,12 @@ def main():
     else:
         remove_docker_files()
 
+    if (
+        "{{ cookiecutter.use_docker }}".lower() == "y"
+        and "{{ cookiecutter.cloud_provider}}".lower() != "aws"
+    ):
+        remove_aws_dockerfile()
+
     if "{{ cookiecutter.use_heroku }}".lower() == "n":
         remove_heroku_files()
 


Test patch: