internlm/SWE-Fixer-Train-110K huggingface dataset:
Repository: cocotb/cocotb

Issue:
cache `want_color_output` calls
`cocotb.utils.want_color_output()` checks the environment and `stdout` properties to determine if the user wants color outputs. This only needs to be computed once, it should not be able to be changed during the course of operation.


Discussion:

Resolving patch:
diff --git a/src/cocotb/utils.py b/src/cocotb/utils.py
--- a/src/cocotb/utils.py
+++ b/src/cocotb/utils.py
@@ -34,6 +34,7 @@
 import weakref
 from decimal import Decimal
 from enum import Enum
+from functools import lru_cache
 from numbers import Real
 from typing import Any, Optional, Type, TypeVar, Union
 
@@ -212,6 +213,7 @@ def __signature__(cls):
         return inspect.signature(cls.__singleton_key__)
 
 
+@lru_cache(maxsize=None)
 def want_color_output():
     """Return ``True`` if colored output is possible/requested and not running in GUI.
 


Test patch:
Repository: cocotb/cocotb

Issue:
Cleanup residual uses of COCOTB_SIM
After #1713 and #1717, it's not useful anymore.

The only instances that are left are in the simulator makefiles, runner.py, and endian_swapper.sv


Discussion:

Resolving patch:
diff --git a/src/cocotb_tools/runner.py b/src/cocotb_tools/runner.py
--- a/src/cocotb_tools/runner.py
+++ b/src/cocotb_tools/runner.py
@@ -582,8 +582,6 @@ def _build_command(self) -> List[Command]:
                     "iverilog",
                     "-o",
                     str(self.sim_file),
-                    "-D",
-                    "COCOTB_SIM=1",
                     "-s",
                     self.hdl_toplevel,
                     "-g2012",
@@ -647,7 +645,6 @@ def _build_command(self) -> List[Command]:
                 ["vlog"]
                 + ([] if self.always else ["-incr"])
                 + ["-work", as_tcl_value(self.hdl_library)]
-                + ["+define+COCOTB_SIM"]
                 + ["-sv"]
                 + self._get_define_options(self.defines)
                 + self._get_include_options(self.includes)
@@ -904,7 +901,7 @@ def _build_command(self) -> List[Command]:
                 )
 
             if self.verilog_sources:
-                do_script += "alog -work {RTL_LIBRARY} +define+COCOTB_SIM -pli {EXT_NAME} -sv {DEFINES} {INCDIR} {EXTRA_ARGS} {VERILOG_SOURCES} \n".format(
+                do_script += "alog -work {RTL_LIBRARY} -pli {EXT_NAME} -sv {DEFINES} {INCDIR} {EXTRA_ARGS} {VERILOG_SOURCES} \n".format(
                     RTL_LIBRARY=as_tcl_value(self.hdl_library),
                     EXT_NAME=as_tcl_value(
                         cocotb_tools.config.lib_name_path("vpi", "riviera")
@@ -1047,7 +1044,6 @@ def _build_command(self) -> List[Command]:
                 "--exe",
                 "-Mdir",
                 str(self.build_dir),
-                "-DCOCOTB_SIM=1",
                 "--top-module",
                 self.hdl_toplevel,
                 "--vpi",
@@ -1162,7 +1158,6 @@ def _build_command(self) -> List[Command]:
             + vhpi_opts
             + [f"-work {self.hdl_library}"]
             + self.build_args
-            + ["-define COCOTB_SIM"]
             + self._get_include_options(self.includes)
             + self._get_define_options(self.defines)
             + self._get_parameter_options(self.parameters)


Test patch:
diff --git a/tests/test_cases/test_iteration_verilog/endian_swapper.sv b/tests/test_cases/test_iteration_verilog/endian_swapper.sv
--- a/tests/test_cases/test_iteration_verilog/endian_swapper.sv
+++ b/tests/test_cases/test_iteration_verilog/endian_swapper.sv
@@ -176,7 +176,6 @@ always @(posedge clk or negedge reset_n) begin
     end
 end
 
-`ifdef COCOTB_SIM
 `ifndef VERILATOR // traced differently
 initial begin
   $dumpfile ("waveform.vcd");
@@ -184,6 +183,5 @@ initial begin
   #1;
 end
 `endif
-`endif
 
 endmodule
Repository: Pycord-Development/pycord

Issue:
ViewStore.remove_view raises TypeError
### Summary

ViewStore.remove_view raises TypeError

### Reproduction Steps

I couldn't find a pattern for this error.

### Minimal Reproducible Code

_No response_

### Expected Results

View.children only contains Items.

### Actual Results

View.children seem to contain Components, which results in this exception:
```py
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/local/lib/python3.9/site-packages/discord/ui/view.py", line 359, in _scheduled_task
    await item.callback(interaction)
  File "/app/utils/views.py", line 136, in back
    self.stop(False)
  File "/app/utils/views.py", line 128, in stop
    super(View, self).stop()
  File "/usr/local/lib/python3.9/site-packages/discord/ui/view.py", line 426, in stop
    self.__cancel_callback(self)
  File "/usr/local/lib/python3.9/site-packages/discord/ui/view.py", line 501, in remove_view
    if item.is_dispatchable():
AttributeError: 'Button' object has no attribute 'is_dispatchable'
```

### Intents

guilds, members, emojis, webhooks, voice_states, guild_messages, guild_reactions, dm_messages, dm_reactions

### System Information

- Python v3.9.5-final
- pycord v2.0.0-alpha
    - pycord pkg_resources: v2.0.0a3783+gaf4d6caf
- aiohttp v3.7.4.post0
- system info: Windows 10 10.0.22000

### Checklist

- [X] I have searched the open issues for duplicates.
- [X] I have shown the entire traceback, if possible.
- [X] I have removed my token from display, if visible.

### Additional Context

_No response_


Discussion:

Resolving patch:
diff --git a/discord/ui/view.py b/discord/ui/view.py
--- a/discord/ui/view.py
+++ b/discord/ui/view.py
@@ -402,7 +402,7 @@ def refresh(self, components: List[Component]):
                 item = _component_to_item(component)
                 if not item.is_dispatchable():
                     continue
-                children.append(component)
+                children.append(item)
             else:
                 older.refresh_component(component)
                 children.append(older)


Test patch:
Repository: Pycord-Development/pycord

Issue:
Make ctx.respond return the message sent
### Summary

similar to ctx.send which returns the message that was sent

### What is the feature request for?

discord.ext.commands

### The Problem

Many people want to know how to get the message sent by ctx.respond so i think it would be something nice to have

### The Ideal Solution

really just make it similar how ctx.send returns the message

### The Current Solution

_No response_

### Additional Context

_No response_


Discussion:
This is not possible. Interaction messages are way different than actual messages.
It could return the InteractionMessage
I think a better option may be to return the Interaction object itself, which can then use `edit_original_message` to accomplish this. I have this working locally and will submit a PR shortly for review.

Resolving patch:
diff --git a/discord/interactions.py b/discord/interactions.py
--- a/discord/interactions.py
+++ b/discord/interactions.py
@@ -475,7 +475,7 @@ async def send_message(
         file: File = None,
         files: List[File] = None,
         delete_after: float = None
-    ) -> None:
+    ) -> Interaction:
         """|coro|
 
         Responds to this interaction by sending a message.
@@ -600,7 +600,7 @@ async def delete():
                 await asyncio.sleep(delete_after)
                 await self._parent.delete_original_message()
             asyncio.ensure_future(delete(), loop=self._parent._state.loop)
-
+        return self._parent
 
     async def edit_message(
         self,


Test patch:
Repository: Pycord-Development/pycord

Issue:
@commands.bot_has_permissions always fails for moderate_members
### Summary

The `@commands.bot_has_permissions` (and possibly other similar decorators such as `has_permissions`) always result in `CheckFailure` if evaluating `moderate_members`.

### Reproduction Steps

Use the example code below in a bot to see the issue happen.

### Minimal Reproducible Code

```python
@commands.command()
@commands.bot_has_permissions(moderate_members=True)
@commands.guild_only()
async def timeout_test(self, ctx):
    await ctx.send("haha permissions work as intended!")
```


### Expected Results

If the bot has either `Administrator` or `Moderate Members`, the message is sent.




### Actual Results

The command will always result in `CheckFailure`, regardless of the bot's permissions.

![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/46067571/146967608-05032f21-1ab2-484a-b477-b0fe03d974a1.png)

### Intents
```
discord.Intents(guilds = True, members = True, bans = True, emojis = True, messages = True, invites = True, reactions = True)
```

### System Information
```
- Python v3.10.1-final
- py-cord v2.0.0-alpha
    - py-cord pkg_resources: v2.0.0a4580+g1d65214e
- aiohttp v3.7.4.post0
- system info: Linux 5.15.10-zen1-1-zen #1 ZEN SMP PREEMPT Fri, 17 Dec 2021 11:17:39 +0000
```

### Checklist

- [X] I have searched the open issues for duplicates.
- [X] I have shown the entire traceback, if possible.
- [X] I have removed my token from display, if visible.

### Additional Context

The timeout functionality works correctly if the bot has the permission to time out members, it is only the check that fails.


Discussion:

Resolving patch:
diff --git a/discord/permissions.py b/discord/permissions.py
--- a/discord/permissions.py
+++ b/discord/permissions.py
@@ -148,7 +148,7 @@ def all(cls: Type[P]) -> P:
         """A factory method that creates a :class:`Permissions` with all
         permissions set to ``True``.
         """
-        return cls(0b111111111111111111111111111111111111111)
+        return cls(-1)
 
     @classmethod
     def all_channel(cls: Type[P]) -> P:


Test patch:
Repository: Pycord-Development/pycord

Issue:
Cog.get_commands() does not return ext.commands commands
### Summary

`Cog.get_commands()` no longer returns anything but slash/interaction based commands, breaking all help commands

### Reproduction Steps

Run the example below with a cog that has `ext.commands` based commands.

### Minimal Reproducible Code

```python
cog = bot.get_cog("MyCog")
commands = cog.get_commands()
print(commands)
#This will return [] unless MyCog contains slash/interaction based commands
```


### Expected Results

Commands inside cog returned as a list.

### Actual Results

Only interaction-based commands are returned

### Intents

```
discord.Intents(guilds = True, members = True, bans = True, emojis = True, messages = True, invites = True, reactions = True)
```

### System Information
```
- Python v3.10.1-final
- py-cord v2.0.0-alpha
    - py-cord pkg_resources: v2.0.0a4627+gca1a76cb
- aiohttp v3.7.4.post0
- system info: Linux 5.15.10-zen1-1-zen #1 ZEN SMP PREEMPT Fri, 17 Dec 2021 11:17:39 +0000
```
### Checklist

- [X] I have searched the open issues for duplicates.
- [X] I have shown the entire traceback, if possible.
- [X] I have removed my token from display, if visible.

### Additional Context

_No response_


Discussion:
This was changed in a recent pull request by me, I made it fit the typehint (it just showed ApplicationCommand)
I can edit it to return ext.commands commands too if approved.
It would be great as currently any and all help commands that were implemented by subclassing `HelpCommand` break, as `send_bot_help()` uses this to create it's mapping. 
After thinking, this change was correct and the behavior should just be overwritten in `ext.commands.Cog`.

Resolving patch:
diff --git a/discord/ext/commands/cog.py b/discord/ext/commands/cog.py
--- a/discord/ext/commands/cog.py
+++ b/discord/ext/commands/cog.py
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@
 import discord
 from ...cog import Cog
 
-from typing import Any, Callable, Generator, TYPE_CHECKING, TypeVar, Type
+from typing import Any, Callable, Generator, TYPE_CHECKING, TypeVar, Type, Union
 
 from ...commands import ApplicationCommand
 
@@ -67,3 +67,16 @@ def walk_commands(self) -> Generator[Command, None, None]:
                     yield command
                     if isinstance(command, GroupMixin):
                         yield from command.walk_commands()
+
+    def get_commands(self) -> List[Union[ApplicationCommand, Command]]:
+        r"""
+        Returns
+        --------
+        List[Union[:class:`~discord.ApplicationCommand`, :class:`.Command`]]
+            A :class:`list` of commands that are defined inside this cog.
+
+            .. note::
+
+                This does not include subcommands.
+        """
+        return [c for c in self.__cog_commands__ if c.parent is None]


Test patch:
Repository: Pycord-Development/pycord

Issue:
Redesign ApplicationContext.respond
### Summary

The ApplicationContext.respond property needs to be redesigned.

### What is the feature request for?

The core library

### The Problem

The `ApplicationContext.respond` property  returns 2 different functions depending on `InteractionResponse.is_done()`. Both take different parameters and return different objects. This is bad practice because it can result in unexpected behavior. Also, type-hinting is kinda hard. 

### The Ideal Solution

It might make sense to create a function `ApplicationContext.respond` that merges all parameters. Depending on `InteractionResponse.is_done()` it ignores the parameter of the other function. The only remaining problem is the different return types. This would simplify the situation, but isn't perfect yet. Maybe someone got a better idea.

### The Current Solution

A property that returns 2 different functions depending on `InteractionResponse.is_done()`.

### Additional Context

_No response_


Discussion:
We could make `ctx.respond` only invoke `ctx.interaction.response.send_message`, and `ctx.followup` would be for the followup messages. We could make some other method that implements the current functionality of `ctx.respond`.

Resolving patch:
diff --git a/discord/commands/context.py b/discord/commands/context.py
--- a/discord/commands/context.py
+++ b/discord/commands/context.py
@@ -134,7 +134,26 @@ def response(self) -> InteractionResponse:
 
     @property
     def respond(self):
-        return self.followup.send if self.response.is_done() else self.interaction.response.send_message
+        if not self.response.is_done():
+            return self.interaction.response.send_message
+        else:
+            raise RuntimeError(f"Interaction was already issued a response. Try using {type(self).__name__}.send_followup() instead.")
+
+    @property
+    async def send_response(self) -> Callable[..., Union[Interaction, Webhook]]:
+        """Callable[..., Union[:class:`~.Interaction`, :class:`~.Webhook`]]: Sends either a response
+        or a followup response depending if the interaction has been responded to yet or not."""
+        if not self.response.is_done():
+            return self.interaction.response.send_message  # self.response
+        else:
+            return self.followup.send  # self.send_followup
+
+    @property
+    def send_followup(self):
+        if self.response.is_done():
+            return self.followup.send
+        else:
+            raise RuntimeError(f"Interaction was not yet issued a response. Try using {type(self).__name__}.respond() first.")
 
     @property
     def defer(self):


Test patch:
Repository: Pycord-Development/pycord

Issue:
`change_interval` not working in `before_loop`
### Summary

if you use `change_interval` in before_loop, the loop never runs

### Reproduction Steps

Create a loop and use the `change_interval` in `before_loop`. Issue seems to be that than `_last_iteration` has no value because there is no last iteration.

### Minimal Reproducible Code

```python
class Test_Loop(commands.Cog):
    def __init__(self, bot):
        self.index = 0
        self.bot = bot
        self.test_loop.start()

    @tasks.loop(minutes=60)
    async def test_loop(self):
        self.index += 1
        print(self.index)

    @test_loop.before_loop
    async def before_test_loop(self):
        self.test_loop.change_interval(minutes=1)
        await self.bot.wait_until_ready()
        print('started "test_loop" loop...')

def setup(bot):
    bot.add_cog(Test_Loop(bot))
```


### Expected Results

Bot prints:
```
started "test_loop" loop...
1
```


### Actual Results

nothing. Loop does not start

### Intents

all

### System Information

- Python v3.9.4-final
- py-cord v2.0.0-alpha
    - py-cord pkg_resources: v2.0.0a4542+gd4f55766
- aiohttp v3.7.3

### Checklist

- [X] I have searched the open issues for duplicates.
- [X] I have shown the entire traceback, if possible.
- [X] I have removed my token from display, if visible.

### Additional Context

_No response_


Discussion:

Resolving patch:
diff --git a/discord/ext/tasks/__init__.py b/discord/ext/tasks/__init__.py
--- a/discord/ext/tasks/__init__.py
+++ b/discord/ext/tasks/__init__.py
@@ -121,6 +121,8 @@ def __init__(
 
         self._before_loop = None
         self._after_loop = None
+        self._before_loop_running = False
+        self._after_loop_running = False
         self._is_being_cancelled = False
         self._has_failed = False
         self._stop_next_iteration = False
@@ -141,11 +143,17 @@ async def _call_loop_function(self, name: str, *args: Any, **kwargs: Any) -> Non
         if coro is None:
             return
 
+        if name.endswith('_loop'):
+            setattr(self, f'_{name}_running', True)
+
         if self._injected is not None:
             await coro(self._injected, *args, **kwargs)
         else:
             await coro(*args, **kwargs)
 
+        if name.endswith('_loop'):
+            setattr(self, f'_{name}_running', False)
+
     def _try_sleep_until(self, dt: datetime.datetime):
         self._handle = SleepHandle(dt=dt, loop=self.loop)
         return self._handle.wait()
@@ -680,7 +688,7 @@ def change_interval(
             self._time = self._get_time_parameter(time)
             self._sleep = self._seconds = self._minutes = self._hours = MISSING
 
-        if self.is_running():
+        if self.is_running() and not (self._before_loop_running or self._after_loop_running):
             if self._time is not MISSING:
                 # prepare the next time index starting from after the last iteration
                 self._prepare_time_index(now=self._last_iteration)


Test patch:
Repository: Pycord-Development/pycord

Issue:
Discord API removed thread.archiver_id, we should remove it from pycord
### Summary

`thread.archiver_id` always returns `None` because Discord removed this attribute from the thread class (see https://github.com/discord/discord-api-docs/commit/82c98ba5699b69706cfb493a7c6e08b67ae1a8f3)

### Reproduction Steps

1) Make thread
2) Archive thread

Thread attribute `thread.archiver_id` will be `None`


### Minimal Reproducible Code

```python
async def on_thread_update(self, before, after):
    print(after.archiver_id)  # will return None every time
```


### Expected Results

`thread.archiver_id` is my user ID

### Actual Results

`thread.archiver_id` is `None`

### Intents

Intents.default() + members

### System Information

- Python v3.9.4-final
- py-cord v2.0.0-alpha
    - py-cord pkg_resources: v2.0.0a4496+gb872cfea
- aiohttp v3.7.4.post0
- system info: Windows 10 10.0.19041


### Checklist

- [X] I have searched the open issues for duplicates.
- [X] I have shown the entire traceback, if possible.
- [X] I have removed my token from display, if visible.

### Additional Context

See this post in the Discord API repo: https://github.com/discord/discord-api-docs/commit/82c98ba5699b69706cfb493a7c6e08b67ae1a8f3

> Also removes `archiver_id` since it's confusing and our clients aren't using it anymore. Audit log should be the source of truth for who archived a thread.


Discussion:

Resolving patch:
diff --git a/discord/threads.py b/discord/threads.py
--- a/discord/threads.py
+++ b/discord/threads.py
@@ -115,8 +115,6 @@ class Thread(Messageable, Hashable):
     invitable: :class:`bool`
         Whether non-moderators can add other non-moderators to this thread.
         This is always ``True`` for public threads.
-    archiver_id: Optional[:class:`int`]
-        The user's ID that archived this thread.
     auto_archive_duration: :class:`int`
         The duration in minutes until the thread is automatically archived due to inactivity.
         Usually a value of 60, 1440, 4320 and 10080.
@@ -141,7 +139,6 @@ class Thread(Messageable, Hashable):
         'locked',
         'archived',
         'invitable',
-        'archiver_id',
         'auto_archive_duration',
         'archive_timestamp',
     )
@@ -185,7 +182,6 @@ def _from_data(self, data: ThreadPayload):
 
     def _unroll_metadata(self, data: ThreadMetadata):
         self.archived = data['archived']
-        self.archiver_id = _get_as_snowflake(data, 'archiver_id')
         self.auto_archive_duration = data['auto_archive_duration']
         self.archive_timestamp = parse_time(data['archive_timestamp'])
         self.locked = data.get('locked', False)
diff --git a/discord/types/threads.py b/discord/types/threads.py
--- a/discord/types/threads.py
+++ b/discord/types/threads.py
@@ -40,7 +40,6 @@ class ThreadMember(TypedDict):
 
 
 class _ThreadMetadataOptional(TypedDict, total=False):
-    archiver_id: Snowflake
     locked: bool
     invitable: bool
 


Test patch:
Repository: Pycord-Development/pycord

Issue:
Slash commands broken
### Summary

Slash commands not appearing in menu

### Reproduction Steps

Any bot, made with pycord has this problem, I think... only one command appears, rest all disappeared.
This might be a bug, but yeah its kinda frustrating as we dont know what to tell all the users.

### Minimal Reproducible Code

_No response_

### Expected Results

Slash command to appear when we type `/`

### Actual Results

Instead it only showed one command, and rest all just disappeared.

### Intents

default

### System Information

Py-cord 2.0.0 alpha
Python 3.8.12 final
Windows 10

### Checklist

- [X] I have searched the open issues for duplicates.
- [X] I have shown the entire traceback, if possible.
- [X] I have removed my token from display, if visible.

### Additional Context

_No response_


Discussion:

Resolving patch:
diff --git a/discord/bot.py b/discord/bot.py
--- a/discord/bot.py
+++ b/discord/bot.py
@@ -130,8 +130,7 @@ def add_application_command(self, command: ApplicationCommand) -> None:
                 command.id = cmd.id
                 self._application_commands[command.id] = command
                 break
-        else:
-            self._pending_application_commands.append(command)
+        self._pending_application_commands.append(command)
 
     def remove_application_command(
         self, command: ApplicationCommand


Test patch: