internlm/SWE-Fixer-Train-110K huggingface dataset:
Repository: crytic/slither

Issue:
[False Negative]: divide-before-multiply not found when in modifier
### What bug did Slither miss and which detector did you anticipate would catch it?

If a divide-before-multiply statement is added inside a modifier, the detector `divide-before-multiply` does not seem to be triggered.

### Frequency

Very Frequently

### Code example to reproduce the issue:

```
// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-3.0

pragma solidity 0.8.18;

contract Test {
    uint256 constant A_NUMBER = 10000;

    modifier checkDivideAndMultiply(uint256 a, uint256 b) {
        require((A_NUMBER / a) * b > 0, "fail");

        _;
    }

    function divideAndMultiplyMod(
        uint256 a,
        uint256 b
    ) public checkDivideAndMultiply(a, b) {}

    function divideAndMultiply(uint256 a, uint256 b) public returns (uint256) {
        return (A_NUMBER / a) * b;
    }
}
```

### Version:

0.10.0

### Relevant log output:

```shell
INFO:Detectors:
Test.divideAndMultiply(uint256,uint256) (contracts/Storage.sol#19-21) performs a multiplication on the result of a division:
        - (A_NUMBER / a) * b (contracts/Storage.sol#20)
Reference: https://github.com/crytic/slither/wiki/Detector-Documentation#divide-before-multiply
INFO:Slither:. analyzed (1 contracts with 93 detectors), 1 result(s) found
```



Discussion:

Resolving patch:
diff --git a/slither/detectors/statements/divide_before_multiply.py b/slither/detectors/statements/divide_before_multiply.py
--- a/slither/detectors/statements/divide_before_multiply.py
+++ b/slither/detectors/statements/divide_before_multiply.py
@@ -133,7 +133,7 @@ def detect_divide_before_multiply(
     results: List[Tuple[FunctionContract, List[Node]]] = []
 
     # Loop for each function and modifier.
-    for function in contract.functions_declared:
+    for function in contract.functions_declared + contract.modifiers_declared:
         if not function.entry_point:
             continue
 


Test patch:
Repository: crytic/slither

Issue:
[Bug-Candidate]: --disable-color ignored, printer produces colored outputs
### Describe the issue:

Flag `--disable-color` seem to be ignored and printer produces colored output with ASCII escape characters not suitable to capture into plaintext files

```
slither --help   
usage: slither target [flag]
Additional options:
...
  --disable-color       Disable output colorization
```

Workaround: pass the output through the following sed script:
```
slither . --print function-summary 2>&1 | sed 's/\x1b\[[0-9;]*m//g'
```

### Code example to reproduce the issue:

<img width="1192" alt="image" src="https://github.com/crytic/slither/assets/7992612/850e41d6-e60e-4383-bdb4-c6d6a385c320">


### Version:

slither --version
0.10.0

From docker image `ghcr.io/trailofbits/eth-security-toolbox:nightly`

### Relevant log output:

_No response_


Discussion:
Thanks for the report @ongrid ! It looks like this printer uses [`MyPrettyTable`](https://github.com/crytic/slither/blob/master/slither/utils/myprettytable.py) to print a table, and that class always uses a colored table. Maybe the `MyPrettyTable` underlying implementation should choose to use the non-colored `PrettyTable` class when colors are disabled: https://github.com/jazzband/prettytable#changing-the-appearance-of-your-table---with-colors
Thanks, @elopez for the pointer. I took the liberty to propose a fix. Let me know if using an environment variable follows the dev best practices guidelines. I'll add a unit test after confirmation.

Resolving patch:
diff --git a/slither/utils/myprettytable.py b/slither/utils/myprettytable.py
--- a/slither/utils/myprettytable.py
+++ b/slither/utils/myprettytable.py
@@ -1,7 +1,10 @@
 from typing import List, Dict, Union
 
+from prettytable import PrettyTable
 from prettytable.colortable import ColorTable, Themes
 
+from slither.utils.colors import Colors
+
 
 class MyPrettyTable:
     def __init__(self, field_names: List[str], pretty_align: bool = True):  # TODO: True by default?
@@ -19,8 +22,12 @@ def __init__(self, field_names: List[str], pretty_align: bool = True):  # TODO:
     def add_row(self, row: List[Union[str, List[str]]]) -> None:
         self._rows.append(row)
 
-    def to_pretty_table(self) -> ColorTable:
-        table = ColorTable(self._field_names, theme=Themes.OCEAN)
+    def to_pretty_table(self) -> PrettyTable:
+        if Colors.COLORIZATION_ENABLED:
+            table = ColorTable(self._field_names, theme=Themes.OCEAN)
+        else:
+            table = PrettyTable(self._field_names)
+
         for row in self._rows:
             table.add_row(row)
         if len(self._options["set_alignment"]):


Test patch:
Repository: crytic/slither

Issue:
slither-prop is listed as "demo" in the cli
https://github.com/crytic/slither/blob/9e69274e45a6c687cae7c2241fb69cb9fa0fee6f/slither/tools/properties/__main__.py#L62-L63


Discussion:

Resolving patch:
diff --git a/slither/tools/documentation/__main__.py b/slither/tools/documentation/__main__.py
--- a/slither/tools/documentation/__main__.py
+++ b/slither/tools/documentation/__main__.py
@@ -21,7 +21,10 @@ def parse_args() -> argparse.Namespace:
     Parse the underlying arguments for the program.
     :return: Returns the arguments for the program.
     """
-    parser = argparse.ArgumentParser(description="Demo", usage="slither-documentation filename")
+    parser = argparse.ArgumentParser(
+        description="Auto-generate NatSpec documentation for every function using OpenAI Codex.",
+        usage="slither-documentation filename",
+    )
 
     parser.add_argument("project", help="The target directory/Solidity file.")
 
diff --git a/slither/tools/properties/__main__.py b/slither/tools/properties/__main__.py
--- a/slither/tools/properties/__main__.py
+++ b/slither/tools/properties/__main__.py
@@ -68,13 +68,13 @@ def parse_args() -> argparse.Namespace:
     :return: Returns the arguments for the program.
     """
     parser = argparse.ArgumentParser(
-        description="Demo",
-        usage="slither-demo filename",
+        description="Generates code properties (e.g., invariants) that can be tested with unit tests or Echidna, entirely automatically.",
+        usage="slither-prop filename",
         formatter_class=argparse.RawDescriptionHelpFormatter,
     )
 
     parser.add_argument(
-        "filename", help="The filename of the contract or truffle directory to analyze."
+        "filename", help="The filename of the contract or project directory to analyze."
     )
 
     parser.add_argument("--contract", help="The targeted contract.")


Test patch:
Repository: crytic/slither

Issue:
filter `name-reused` to only run on Truffle projects
The detector should check which platform was used with https://crytic.github.io/crytic-compile/crytic_compile/crytic_compile.html#CryticCompile.platform and https://crytic.github.io/slither/slither/core/compilation_unit.html#SlitherCompilationUnit.crytic_compile 
https://github.com/crytic/slither/blob/13d7d9f66a6be4f798478fa3735fb63444b46c3d/slither/detectors/slither/name_reused.py#L51-L61

https://github.com/crytic/crytic-compile/blob/b5c538aaa66be44b7a68d9723881a7eba2c20898/crytic_compile/platform/truffle.py#L83-L90


Discussion:

Resolving patch:
diff --git a/slither/detectors/slither/name_reused.py b/slither/detectors/slither/name_reused.py
--- a/slither/detectors/slither/name_reused.py
+++ b/slither/detectors/slither/name_reused.py
@@ -1,6 +1,8 @@
 from collections import defaultdict
 from typing import List
 
+from crytic_compile.platform import Type as PlatformType
+
 from slither.core.compilation_unit import SlitherCompilationUnit
 from slither.core.declarations import Contract
 from slither.detectors.abstract_detector import (
@@ -61,6 +63,8 @@ class NameReused(AbstractDetector):
     def _detect(self) -> List[Output]:
         results = []
         compilation_unit = self.compilation_unit
+        if compilation_unit.core.crytic_compile.platform != PlatformType.TRUFFLE:
+            return []
 
         all_contracts = compilation_unit.contracts
         all_contracts_name = [c.name for c in all_contracts]


Test patch:
Repository: pennersr/django-allauth

Issue:
Make it easier for people to set config variables when running the example application
It could be easier to configure the example without needing to touch repo code.



Discussion:

Resolving patch:
diff --git a/example/settings.py b/example/settings.py
--- a/example/settings.py
+++ b/example/settings.py
@@ -168,3 +168,8 @@
         },
     }
 }
+
+try:
+    from local_settings import *
+except ImportError:
+    pass


Test patch:
Repository: pennersr/django-allauth

Issue:
EmailAddress uses user.email instead of helper user_email
EmailAddress uses user.email instead of helper user_email in various places, e.g.:

```
47         self.user.email = self.email
...
61             self.user.email = new_email
```



Discussion:
hm... I guess it can't use the helper method cause that's just a getter. Maybe a setter is needed? I feel like this will cause errors if user doesn't have an email field.

Edit: Nvm, you can get and set with user_email


Resolving patch:
diff --git a/allauth/account/management/commands/account_unsetmultipleprimaryemails.py b/allauth/account/management/commands/account_unsetmultipleprimaryemails.py
--- a/allauth/account/management/commands/account_unsetmultipleprimaryemails.py
+++ b/allauth/account/management/commands/account_unsetmultipleprimaryemails.py
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 from django.core.management.base import BaseCommand
 from django.db.models import Count
 
-from allauth.utils import get_user_model
+from allauth.utils import get_user_model, user_email
 from allauth.account.models import EmailAddress
 
 User = get_user_model()
@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ def unprimary_extra_primary_emails(self, user):
                 user=user, primary=True)
 
         for primary_email_address in primary_email_addresses:
-            if primary_email_address.email == user.email:
+            if primary_email_address.email == user_email(user):
                 break
         else:
             # Didn't find the main email addresses and break the for loop
diff --git a/allauth/account/models.py b/allauth/account/models.py
--- a/allauth/account/models.py
+++ b/allauth/account/models.py
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@
 from . import app_settings
 from . import signals
 
-from .utils import random_token
+from .utils import random_token, user_email
 from .managers import EmailAddressManager, EmailConfirmationManager
 from .adapter import get_adapter
 
@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ def set_as_primary(self, conditional=False):
             old_primary.save()
         self.primary = True
         self.save()
-        self.user.email = self.email
+        user_email(self.user, self.email)
         self.user.save()
         return True
     
@@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ def change(self, request, new_email, confirm=True):
         Given a new email address, change self and re-confirm.
         """
         with transaction.commit_on_success():
-            self.user.email = new_email
+            user_email(self.user, new_email)
             self.user.save()
             self.email = new_email
             self.verified = False


Test patch:
Repository: pennersr/django-allauth

Issue:
Need opinions: remembering and displaying which method the user used to log in last time
One of the arguments against the use of social logins is that users won't remember how they logged in last time (Facebook, Twitter, email, etc.), leaving them confused, frustrated, and unable to retrieve the setings or work associated with their account.

I would like to propose a solution/idea and hear what others have to say:

How about setting a cookie upon each successful login that specifies the login method so that when users visit the login page again, they'll be told, "The last login from this computer and browser was with Twitter. <More user education and explanation goes here>" You could even go so far as to only present the last login method, together with an explanation and a toggle button that allows users to display the rest of the login methods.

I haven't seen this done anywhere on the internet in my extensive "career" of browsing the internet.

So what gives? Why hasn't this been done yet? What implications am I missing? Have any of you seen an example of this in use?

The changes to Django-AllAuth to make this happen are minimal:

Pass the 'response' object to the 'user_logged_in' signal. The rest can be left up to the app developer, namely:
Upon receiving the user_logged_in signal, set the cookie on the response object.
Use the cookie in the template or javascript of the login page.



Discussion:

Resolving patch:
diff --git a/allauth/account/utils.py b/allauth/account/utils.py
--- a/allauth/account/utils.py
+++ b/allauth/account/utils.py
@@ -120,8 +120,10 @@ def perform_login(request, user, email_verification,
     if not user.is_active:
         return HttpResponseRedirect(reverse('account_inactive'))
     get_adapter().login(request, user)
+    response = HttpResponseRedirect(get_login_redirect_url(request, redirect_url))
     signals.user_logged_in.send(sender=user.__class__,
                                 request=request,
+                                response=response,
                                 user=user,
                                 **signal_kwargs)
     get_adapter().add_message(request,
@@ -129,7 +131,7 @@ def perform_login(request, user, email_verification,
                               'account/messages/logged_in.txt',
                               {'user': user})
 
-    return HttpResponseRedirect(get_login_redirect_url(request, redirect_url))
+    return response
 
 
 def complete_signup(request, user, email_verification, success_url,


Test patch:
Repository: pennersr/django-allauth

Issue:
Care about Twitch's request rate limit
Hi,

The Twitch API documentation suggests sending the client ID in each request to avoid getting request-limited too early, which is not implemented currently (see https://github.com/justintv/Twitch-API#rate-limits).
I'm not quite sure how this quota/whatever system works, here is some more (maybe outdated) information concerning the limits:
https://github.com/justintv/Twitch-API/issues/50

Nevertheless I think this should be implemented.
The first authorization request to https://api.twitch.tv/kraken/oauth2/authorize obviously already contains the client ID as a query parameter.
[Here](https://github.com/pennersr/django-allauth/blob/master/allauth/socialaccount/providers/twitch/views.py#L17)'s an example where it is missing. Are there any more or would it just be this small fix?



Discussion:
Indeed, only that.. as the client ID is already passed to https://api.twitch.tv/kraken/oauth2/token as well.


Resolving patch:
diff --git a/allauth/socialaccount/providers/twitch/views.py b/allauth/socialaccount/providers/twitch/views.py
--- a/allauth/socialaccount/providers/twitch/views.py
+++ b/allauth/socialaccount/providers/twitch/views.py
@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ class TwitchOAuth2Adapter(OAuth2Adapter):
 
     def complete_login(self, request, app, token, **kwargs):
         resp = requests.get(self.profile_url,
-                            params={'oauth_token': token.token})
+                            params={ 'oauth_token': token.token, 'client_id': app.client_id })
         extra_data = resp.json()
         return self.get_provider().sociallogin_from_response(request,
                                                              extra_data)


Test patch:
Repository: pennersr/django-allauth

Issue:
SubfieldBase removed in Django 1.10
`allauth.socialaccount.fields.JSONField` needs updating. 

```
  File ".../python2.7/importlib/__init__.py", line 37, in import_module
    __import__(name)
  File ".../allauth/socialaccount/models.py", line 23, in <module>
    from .fields import JSONField
  File ".../allauth/socialaccount/fields.py", line 15, in <module>
    models.TextField)):
  File "=django/utils/six.py", line 778, in __new__
    return meta(name, bases, d)
  File ".../django/db/models/fields/subclassing.py", line 22, in __new__
    RemovedInDjango110Warning)
django.utils.deprecation.RemovedInDjango110Warning: SubfieldBase has been deprecated. Use Field.from_db_value instead.
```

`Field.from_db_value` is new in 1.8. Happy to have a look at this but what's your requirement for supported Django versions? 



Discussion:

Resolving patch:
diff --git a/allauth/socialaccount/fields.py b/allauth/socialaccount/fields.py
--- a/allauth/socialaccount/fields.py
+++ b/allauth/socialaccount/fields.py
@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
 # Courtesy of django-social-auth
 import json
 
+import django
 from django.core.exceptions import ValidationError
 from django.db import models
 from django.utils import six
@@ -11,11 +12,17 @@
     from django.utils.encoding import smart_text
 
 
-class JSONField(six.with_metaclass(models.SubfieldBase,
-                                   models.TextField)):
+if django.VERSION < (1, 8):
+    JSONFieldBase = six.with_metaclass(models.SubfieldBase, models.TextField)
+else:
+    JSONFieldBase = models.TextField
+
+class JSONField(JSONFieldBase):
     """Simple JSON field that stores python structures as JSON strings
     on database.
     """
+    def from_db_value(self, value, expression, connection, context):
+        return self.to_python(value)
 
     def to_python(self, value):
         """


Test patch:
Repository: pennersr/django-allauth

Issue:
Can't use Django 1.8's Jinja2 template backend
In Django 1.7, I was able to substitute Jinja2 templates for almost all django-allauth pages, so that authentication pages could be styled the same way as the rest of my content.  In Django 1.8, almost all can be substituted except for `socialaccount/authentication_error.html`, and `openid/login.html`, because of how the views render the templates.

In the case of `socialaccount/authentication_error.html`, the call is in the file`allauth/socialaccount/helpers.py`, in `render_authentication_error()`:

``` python
        return render_to_response(
            "socialaccount/authentication_error.html",
            context, context_instance=RequestContext(request))
```

Using `context_instance` triggers the deprecated code path in Django's [template/loader.py](https://github.com/django/django/blob/master/django/template/loader.py#L84-L86), which includes removing template backends (like Jinja2) that don't support the legacy parameters.



Discussion:

Resolving patch:
diff --git a/allauth/socialaccount/helpers.py b/allauth/socialaccount/helpers.py
--- a/allauth/socialaccount/helpers.py
+++ b/allauth/socialaccount/helpers.py
@@ -1,8 +1,7 @@
 from django.contrib import messages
 from django.contrib.auth import logout
-from django.shortcuts import render_to_response, render
+from django.shortcuts import render
 from django.http import HttpResponseRedirect
-from django.template import RequestContext
 from django.forms import ValidationError
 from django.core.urlresolvers import reverse
 
@@ -84,9 +83,8 @@ def render_authentication_error(request,
         }
     }
     context.update(extra_context)
-    return render_to_response(
-        "socialaccount/authentication_error.html",
-        context, context_instance=RequestContext(request))
+    return render(
+        request, "socialaccount/authentication_error.html", context)
 
 
 def _add_social_account(request, sociallogin):
diff --git a/allauth/socialaccount/providers/openid/views.py b/allauth/socialaccount/providers/openid/views.py
--- a/allauth/socialaccount/providers/openid/views.py
+++ b/allauth/socialaccount/providers/openid/views.py
@@ -1,5 +1,4 @@
-from django.shortcuts import render_to_response
-from django.template import RequestContext
+from django.shortcuts import render
 from django.core.urlresolvers import reverse
 from django.http import HttpResponseRedirect
 from django.views.decorators.csrf import csrf_exempt
@@ -68,8 +67,7 @@ def login(request):
         form = LoginForm(initial={'next': request.GET.get('next'),
                                   'process': request.GET.get('process')})
     d = dict(form=form)
-    return render_to_response('openid/login.html',
-                              d, context_instance=RequestContext(request))
+    return render(request, "openid/login.html", d)
 
 
 @csrf_exempt


Test patch:
Repository: pennersr/django-allauth

Issue:
Foursquare Name
Hello the foursquare connect ist connecting fine but is displaying Foursquare as the connected name. How can i change that?



Discussion:
Have a look at the FoursquareAccount class and compare that to the FacebookAccount class. The former is missing the `to_str`.


Resolving patch:
diff --git a/allauth/socialaccount/providers/foursquare/provider.py b/allauth/socialaccount/providers/foursquare/provider.py
--- a/allauth/socialaccount/providers/foursquare/provider.py
+++ b/allauth/socialaccount/providers/foursquare/provider.py
@@ -11,6 +11,10 @@ def get_profile_url(self):
     def get_avatar_url(self):
         return self.account.extra_data.get('photo')
 
+    def to_str(self):
+        dflt = super(FoursquareAccount, self).to_str()
+        return self.account.extra_data.get('name', dflt)
+
 
 class FoursquareProvider(OAuth2Provider):
     id = 'foursquare'


Test patch:
Repository: pennersr/django-allauth

Issue:
django 1.9a KeyError at /accounts/signup
Upgraded to django 1.9a with the cookie cutter template and got this:

KeyError at /accounts/signup/

'form'

Request Method:     GET
Request URL:    http://127.0.0.1:8000/accounts/signup/
Django Version:     1.9a1
Exception Type:     KeyError
Exception Value:    

'form'

Exception Location:     /usr/home/foo/src/django-allauth/allauth/account/views.py in get_context_data, line 192
Python Executable:  /usr/home/foo/.virtualenvs/bar/bin/python
Python Version:     2.7.10
Python Path:    

['/usr/home/foo/Projects/bar',
 '/usr/home/foo/src/django-allauth',

The Django 1.9a release notes (https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/releases/1.9/) say this which seems related. I tried moving the call to super() above the kwargs lookup but it didn't help the kwargs dict is still empty:

Form initialization was moved from the ProcessFormView.get() method to the new FormMixin.get_context_data() method. This may be backwards incompatible if you have overridden the get_context_data() method without calling super().



Discussion:

Resolving patch:
diff --git a/allauth/account/views.py b/allauth/account/views.py
--- a/allauth/account/views.py
+++ b/allauth/account/views.py
@@ -189,10 +189,10 @@ def form_valid(self, form):
                                self.get_success_url())
 
     def get_context_data(self, **kwargs):
-        form = kwargs['form']
+        ret = super(SignupView, self).get_context_data(**kwargs)
+        form = ret['form']
         form.fields["email"].initial = self.request.session \
             .get('account_verified_email', None)
-        ret = super(SignupView, self).get_context_data(**kwargs)
         login_url = passthrough_next_redirect_url(self.request,
                                                   reverse("account_login"),
                                                   self.redirect_field_name)


Test patch: