internlm/Lean-Github huggingface dataset:
Theorem: Hilbert_kernel_regularity_main_part
Proof state before:
case hg.h.h.hg.h
y y' : ℝ
yy'nonneg : 0 ≤ y ∧ 0 ≤ y'
ypos : 0 < y
y2ley' : y / 2 ≤ y'
hy : y ≤ 1
hy' : y' ≤ 1
f : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp)
f' : ℝ → ℂ :=
  fun t =>
    (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2
f'def :
  f' = fun t =>
    (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2
c : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => 1 - ↑t
cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t
c' : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => -1
c'def : c' = fun t => -1
d : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
d' : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
d_nonzero : ∀ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y → d t ≠ 0
f_deriv : ∀ t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y, HasDerivAt f (f' t) t
⊢ Continuous fun y => -(Complex.I * ↑y)
Tactic:
apply Continuous.neg
Proof state after:
case hg.h.h.hg.h.hf
y y' : ℝ
yy'nonneg : 0 ≤ y ∧ 0 ≤ y'
ypos : 0 < y
y2ley' : y / 2 ≤ y'
hy : y ≤ 1
hy' : y' ≤ 1
f : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp)
f' : ℝ → ℂ :=
  fun t =>
    (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2
f'def :
  f' = fun t =>
    (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2
c : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => 1 - ↑t
cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t
c' : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => -1
c'def : c' = fun t => -1
d : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
d' : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
d_nonzero : ∀ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y → d t ≠ 0
f_deriv : ∀ t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y, HasDerivAt f (f' t) t
⊢ Continuous fun x => Complex.I * ↑x
Theorem: Hilbert_kernel_regularity_main_part
Proof state before:
case hg.h.h.hg.h.hf
y y' : ℝ
yy'nonneg : 0 ≤ y ∧ 0 ≤ y'
ypos : 0 < y
y2ley' : y / 2 ≤ y'
hy : y ≤ 1
hy' : y' ≤ 1
f : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp)
f' : ℝ → ℂ :=
  fun t =>
    (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2
f'def :
  f' = fun t =>
    (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2
c : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => 1 - ↑t
cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t
c' : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => -1
c'def : c' = fun t => -1
d : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
d' : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
d_nonzero : ∀ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y → d t ≠ 0
f_deriv : ∀ t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y, HasDerivAt f (f' t) t
⊢ Continuous fun x => Complex.I * ↑x
Tactic:
apply Continuous.mul
Proof state after:
case hg.h.h.hg.h.hf.hf
y y' : ℝ
yy'nonneg : 0 ≤ y ∧ 0 ≤ y'
ypos : 0 < y
y2ley' : y / 2 ≤ y'
hy : y ≤ 1
hy' : y' ≤ 1
f : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp)
f' : ℝ → ℂ :=
  fun t =>
    (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2
f'def :
  f' = fun t =>
    (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2
c : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => 1 - ↑t
cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t
c' : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => -1
c'def : c' = fun t => -1
d : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
d' : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
d_nonzero : ∀ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y → d t ≠ 0
f_deriv : ∀ t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y, HasDerivAt f (f' t) t
⊢ Continuous fun x => Complex.I

case hg.h.h.hg.h.hf.hg
y y' : ℝ
yy'nonneg : 0 ≤ y ∧ 0 ≤ y'
ypos : 0 < y
y2ley' : y / 2 ≤ y'
hy : y ≤ 1
hy' : y' ≤ 1
f : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp)
f' : ℝ → ℂ :=
  fun t =>
    (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2
f'def :
  f' = fun t =>
    (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2
c : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => 1 - ↑t
cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t
c' : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => -1
c'def : c' = fun t => -1
d : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
d' : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
d_nonzero : ∀ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y → d t ≠ 0
f_deriv : ∀ t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y, HasDerivAt f (f' t) t
⊢ Continuous fun x => ↑x
Theorem: Hilbert_kernel_regularity_main_part
Proof state before:
case hg.h.h.hg.h.hf.hf
y y' : ℝ
yy'nonneg : 0 ≤ y ∧ 0 ≤ y'
ypos : 0 < y
y2ley' : y / 2 ≤ y'
hy : y ≤ 1
hy' : y' ≤ 1
f : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp)
f' : ℝ → ℂ :=
  fun t =>
    (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2
f'def :
  f' = fun t =>
    (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2
c : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => 1 - ↑t
cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t
c' : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => -1
c'def : c' = fun t => -1
d : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
d' : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
d_nonzero : ∀ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y → d t ≠ 0
f_deriv : ∀ t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y, HasDerivAt f (f' t) t
⊢ Continuous fun x => Complex.I

case hg.h.h.hg.h.hf.hg
y y' : ℝ
yy'nonneg : 0 ≤ y ∧ 0 ≤ y'
ypos : 0 < y
y2ley' : y / 2 ≤ y'
hy : y ≤ 1
hy' : y' ≤ 1
f : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp)
f' : ℝ → ℂ :=
  fun t =>
    (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2
f'def :
  f' = fun t =>
    (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2
c : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => 1 - ↑t
cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t
c' : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => -1
c'def : c' = fun t => -1
d : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
d' : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
d_nonzero : ∀ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y → d t ≠ 0
f_deriv : ∀ t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y, HasDerivAt f (f' t) t
⊢ Continuous fun x => ↑x
Tactic:
. apply continuous_const
Proof state after:
case hg.h.h.hg.h.hf.hg
y y' : ℝ
yy'nonneg : 0 ≤ y ∧ 0 ≤ y'
ypos : 0 < y
y2ley' : y / 2 ≤ y'
hy : y ≤ 1
hy' : y' ≤ 1
f : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp)
f' : ℝ → ℂ :=
  fun t =>
    (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2
f'def :
  f' = fun t =>
    (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2
c : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => 1 - ↑t
cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t
c' : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => -1
c'def : c' = fun t => -1
d : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
d' : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
d_nonzero : ∀ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y → d t ≠ 0
f_deriv : ∀ t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y, HasDerivAt f (f' t) t
⊢ Continuous fun x => ↑x
Theorem: Hilbert_kernel_regularity_main_part
Proof state before:
case hg.h.h.hg.h.hf.hg
y y' : ℝ
yy'nonneg : 0 ≤ y ∧ 0 ≤ y'
ypos : 0 < y
y2ley' : y / 2 ≤ y'
hy : y ≤ 1
hy' : y' ≤ 1
f : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp)
f' : ℝ → ℂ :=
  fun t =>
    (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2
f'def :
  f' = fun t =>
    (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2
c : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => 1 - ↑t
cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t
c' : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => -1
c'def : c' = fun t => -1
d : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
d' : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
d_nonzero : ∀ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y → d t ≠ 0
f_deriv : ∀ t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y, HasDerivAt f (f' t) t
⊢ Continuous fun x => ↑x
Tactic:
. apply Complex.continuous_ofReal
Proof state after:
no goals
Theorem: Hilbert_kernel_regularity_main_part
Proof state before:
case hg.h.h.hg.h.hf.hf
y y' : ℝ
yy'nonneg : 0 ≤ y ∧ 0 ≤ y'
ypos : 0 < y
y2ley' : y / 2 ≤ y'
hy : y ≤ 1
hy' : y' ≤ 1
f : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp)
f' : ℝ → ℂ :=
  fun t =>
    (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2
f'def :
  f' = fun t =>
    (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2
c : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => 1 - ↑t
cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t
c' : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => -1
c'def : c' = fun t => -1
d : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
d' : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
d_nonzero : ∀ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y → d t ≠ 0
f_deriv : ∀ t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y, HasDerivAt f (f' t) t
⊢ Continuous fun x => Complex.I
Tactic:
apply continuous_const
Proof state after:
no goals
Theorem: Hilbert_kernel_regularity_main_part
Proof state before:
case hg.h.h.hg.h.hf.hg
y y' : ℝ
yy'nonneg : 0 ≤ y ∧ 0 ≤ y'
ypos : 0 < y
y2ley' : y / 2 ≤ y'
hy : y ≤ 1
hy' : y' ≤ 1
f : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp)
f' : ℝ → ℂ :=
  fun t =>
    (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2
f'def :
  f' = fun t =>
    (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2
c : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => 1 - ↑t
cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t
c' : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => -1
c'def : c' = fun t => -1
d : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
d' : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
d_nonzero : ∀ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y → d t ≠ 0
f_deriv : ∀ t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y, HasDerivAt f (f' t) t
⊢ Continuous fun x => ↑x
Tactic:
apply Complex.continuous_ofReal
Proof state after:
no goals
Theorem: Hilbert_kernel_regularity_main_part
Proof state before:
case h₀
y y' : ℝ
yy'nonneg : 0 ≤ y ∧ 0 ≤ y'
ypos : 0 < y
y2ley' : y / 2 ≤ y'
hy : y ≤ 1
hy' : y' ≤ 1
f : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp)
f' : ℝ → ℂ :=
  fun t =>
    (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2
f'def :
  f' = fun t =>
    (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2
c : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => 1 - ↑t
cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t
c' : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => -1
c'def : c' = fun t => -1
d : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
d' : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
d_nonzero : ∀ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y → d t ≠ 0
f_deriv : ∀ t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y, HasDerivAt f (f' t) t
⊢ ∀ x ∈ Set.uIcc y' y, (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑x)).exp) ^ 2 ≠ 0
Tactic:
intro t ht
Proof state after:
case h₀
y y' : ℝ
yy'nonneg : 0 ≤ y ∧ 0 ≤ y'
ypos : 0 < y
y2ley' : y / 2 ≤ y'
hy : y ≤ 1
hy' : y' ≤ 1
f : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp)
f' : ℝ → ℂ :=
  fun t =>
    (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2
f'def :
  f' = fun t =>
    (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2
c : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => 1 - ↑t
cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t
c' : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => -1
c'def : c' = fun t => -1
d : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
d' : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
d_nonzero : ∀ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y → d t ≠ 0
f_deriv : ∀ t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y, HasDerivAt f (f' t) t
t : ℝ
ht : t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y
⊢ (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 ≠ 0
Theorem: Hilbert_kernel_regularity_main_part
Proof state before:
case h₀
y y' : ℝ
yy'nonneg : 0 ≤ y ∧ 0 ≤ y'
ypos : 0 < y
y2ley' : y / 2 ≤ y'
hy : y ≤ 1
hy' : y' ≤ 1
f : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp)
f' : ℝ → ℂ :=
  fun t =>
    (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2
f'def :
  f' = fun t =>
    (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2
c : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => 1 - ↑t
cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t
c' : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => -1
c'def : c' = fun t => -1
d : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
d' : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
d_nonzero : ∀ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y → d t ≠ 0
f_deriv : ∀ t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y, HasDerivAt f (f' t) t
t : ℝ
ht : t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y
⊢ (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 ≠ 0
Tactic:
simp
Proof state after:
case h₀
y y' : ℝ
yy'nonneg : 0 ≤ y ∧ 0 ≤ y'
ypos : 0 < y
y2ley' : y / 2 ≤ y'
hy : y ≤ 1
hy' : y' ≤ 1
f : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp)
f' : ℝ → ℂ :=
  fun t =>
    (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2
f'def :
  f' = fun t =>
    (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2
c : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => 1 - ↑t
cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t
c' : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => -1
c'def : c' = fun t => -1
d : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
d' : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
d_nonzero : ∀ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y → d t ≠ 0
f_deriv : ∀ t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y, HasDerivAt f (f' t) t
t : ℝ
ht : t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y
⊢ ¬1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp = 0
Theorem: Hilbert_kernel_regularity_main_part
Proof state before:
case h₀
y y' : ℝ
yy'nonneg : 0 ≤ y ∧ 0 ≤ y'
ypos : 0 < y
y2ley' : y / 2 ≤ y'
hy : y ≤ 1
hy' : y' ≤ 1
f : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp)
f' : ℝ → ℂ :=
  fun t =>
    (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2
f'def :
  f' = fun t =>
    (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2
c : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => 1 - ↑t
cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t
c' : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => -1
c'def : c' = fun t => -1
d : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
d' : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
d_nonzero : ∀ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y → d t ≠ 0
f_deriv : ∀ t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y, HasDerivAt f (f' t) t
t : ℝ
ht : t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y
⊢ ¬1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp = 0
Tactic:
apply d_nonzero ht
Proof state after:
no goals
Theorem: Hilbert_kernel_regularity_main_part
Proof state before:
y y' : ℝ
yy'nonneg : 0 ≤ y ∧ 0 ≤ y'
ypos : 0 < y
y2ley' : y / 2 ≤ y'
hy : y ≤ 1
hy' : y' ≤ 1
f : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp)
f' : ℝ → ℂ :=
  fun t =>
    (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2
f'def :
  f' = fun t =>
    (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2
c : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => 1 - ↑t
cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t
c' : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => -1
c'def : c' = fun t => -1
d : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
d' : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
d_nonzero : ∀ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y → d t ≠ 0
f_deriv : ∀ t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y, HasDerivAt f (f' t) t
f'_cont : ContinuousOn (fun t => f' t) (Set.uIcc y' y)
⊢ ‖(1 - ↑y) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑y)).exp) - (1 - ↑y') / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑y')).exp)‖ = ‖f y - f y'‖
Tactic:
simp
Proof state after:
no goals
Theorem: Hilbert_kernel_regularity_main_part
Proof state before:
y y' : ℝ
yy'nonneg : 0 ≤ y ∧ 0 ≤ y'
ypos : 0 < y
y2ley' : y / 2 ≤ y'
hy : y ≤ 1
hy' : y' ≤ 1
f : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp)
f' : ℝ → ℂ :=
  fun t =>
    (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2
f'def :
  f' = fun t =>
    (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2
c : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => 1 - ↑t
cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t
c' : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => -1
c'def : c' = fun t => -1
d : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
d' : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
d_nonzero : ∀ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y → d t ≠ 0
f_deriv : ∀ t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y, HasDerivAt f (f' t) t
f'_cont : ContinuousOn (fun t => f' t) (Set.uIcc y' y)
⊢ ‖f y - f y'‖ = ‖∫ (t : ℝ) in y'..y, f' t‖
Tactic:
congr 1
Proof state after:
case e_a
y y' : ℝ
yy'nonneg : 0 ≤ y ∧ 0 ≤ y'
ypos : 0 < y
y2ley' : y / 2 ≤ y'
hy : y ≤ 1
hy' : y' ≤ 1
f : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp)
f' : ℝ → ℂ :=
  fun t =>
    (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2
f'def :
  f' = fun t =>
    (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2
c : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => 1 - ↑t
cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t
c' : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => -1
c'def : c' = fun t => -1
d : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
d' : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
d_nonzero : ∀ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y → d t ≠ 0
f_deriv : ∀ t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y, HasDerivAt f (f' t) t
f'_cont : ContinuousOn (fun t => f' t) (Set.uIcc y' y)
⊢ f y - f y' = ∫ (t : ℝ) in y'..y, f' t
Theorem: Hilbert_kernel_regularity_main_part
Proof state before:
case e_a
y y' : ℝ
yy'nonneg : 0 ≤ y ∧ 0 ≤ y'
ypos : 0 < y
y2ley' : y / 2 ≤ y'
hy : y ≤ 1
hy' : y' ≤ 1
f : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp)
f' : ℝ → ℂ :=
  fun t =>
    (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2
f'def :
  f' = fun t =>
    (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2
c : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => 1 - ↑t
cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t
c' : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => -1
c'def : c' = fun t => -1
d : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
d' : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
d_nonzero : ∀ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y → d t ≠ 0
f_deriv : ∀ t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y, HasDerivAt f (f' t) t
f'_cont : ContinuousOn (fun t => f' t) (Set.uIcc y' y)
⊢ f y - f y' = ∫ (t : ℝ) in y'..y, f' t
Tactic:
rw [intervalIntegral.integral_eq_sub_of_hasDerivAt]
Proof state after:
case e_a.hderiv
y y' : ℝ
yy'nonneg : 0 ≤ y ∧ 0 ≤ y'
ypos : 0 < y
y2ley' : y / 2 ≤ y'
hy : y ≤ 1
hy' : y' ≤ 1
f : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp)
f' : ℝ → ℂ :=
  fun t =>
    (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2
f'def :
  f' = fun t =>
    (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2
c : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => 1 - ↑t
cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t
c' : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => -1
c'def : c' = fun t => -1
d : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
d' : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
d_nonzero : ∀ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y → d t ≠ 0
f_deriv : ∀ t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y, HasDerivAt f (f' t) t
f'_cont : ContinuousOn (fun t => f' t) (Set.uIcc y' y)
⊢ ∀ x ∈ Set.uIcc y' y, HasDerivAt f (f' x) x

case e_a.hint
y y' : ℝ
yy'nonneg : 0 ≤ y ∧ 0 ≤ y'
ypos : 0 < y
y2ley' : y / 2 ≤ y'
hy : y ≤ 1
hy' : y' ≤ 1
f : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp)
f' : ℝ → ℂ :=
  fun t =>
    (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2
f'def :
  f' = fun t =>
    (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2
c : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => 1 - ↑t
cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t
c' : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => -1
c'def : c' = fun t => -1
d : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
d' : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
d_nonzero : ∀ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y → d t ≠ 0
f_deriv : ∀ t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y, HasDerivAt f (f' t) t
f'_cont : ContinuousOn (fun t => f' t) (Set.uIcc y' y)
⊢ IntervalIntegrable (fun t => f' t) MeasureTheory.volume y' y