Theorem: LRAT.DefaultFormula.confirmRupHint_preserves_invariant_helper
Proof state before:
case neg
n : Nat
f : DefaultFormula n
f_assignments_size : f.assignments.size = n
acc : Array Assignment × List (Literal (PosFin n)) × Bool × Bool
hsize : acc.fst.size = n
l : Literal (PosFin n)
ih : f.derivedLits_invariant f_assignments_size acc.fst hsize acc.snd.fst
h : ¬hasAssignment l.snd acc.fst[l.fst.val]! = true
hsize'✝ : (acc.fst.modify l.fst.val (addAssignment l.snd)).size = n :=
  Eq.mpr (id (congrArg (fun _a => _a = n) Array.modify_preserves_size)) hsize
i : Fin n
i_in_bounds : ↑i < acc.fst.size
l_in_bounds : l.fst.val < acc.fst.size
j : Fin acc.snd.fst.length
j_eq_i : (acc.snd.fst.get j).fst.val = ↑i
h1 : acc.fst[↑i] = addAssignment (acc.snd.fst.get j).snd f.assignments[↑i]
h2 : ¬hasAssignment (acc.snd.fst.get j).snd f.assignments[↑i] = true
h3 : ∀ (k : Fin acc.snd.fst.length), k ≠ j → (acc.snd.fst.get k).fst.val ≠ ↑i
l' : Literal (PosFin n) := acc.snd.fst.get j
zero_in_bounds : 0 < (l :: acc.snd.fst).length
j_succ_in_bounds : ↑j + 1 < (l :: acc.snd.fst).length
l_eq_i : l.fst.val = ↑i
l_ne_l' : l.snd ≠ l'.snd
h✝ : ¬l.snd = true
⊢ ∃ j1 j2,
    ((l :: acc.snd.fst).get j1).fst.val = ↑i ∧
      ((l :: acc.snd.fst).get j2).fst.val = ↑i ∧
        ((l :: acc.snd.fst).get j1).snd = true ∧
          ((l :: acc.snd.fst).get j2).snd = false ∧
            (acc.fst.modify l.fst.val (addAssignment l.snd))[↑i] = both ∧
              f.assignments[↑i] = unassigned ∧
                ∀ (k : Fin (l :: acc.snd.fst).length), k ≠ j1 → k ≠ j2 → ((l :: acc.snd.fst).get k).fst.val ≠ ↑i
Tactic:
. next l_eq_false =>
  simp only [Bool.not_eq_true] at l_eq_false
  rw [l_eq_false] at l_ne_l'
  have l'_eq_true : l'.2 = true := by
    have l'_ne_false : l'.2 ≠ false := Ne.symm l_ne_l'
    simp only [ne_eq, Bool.not_eq_false] at l'_ne_false
    exact l'_ne_false
  refine ⟨⟨j.1 + 1, j_succ_in_bounds⟩, ⟨0, zero_in_bounds⟩, ?_⟩
  constructor
  . simp only [List.get, Nat.add_eq, Nat.add_zero]
    exact j_eq_i
  . constructor
    . simp only [List.get]
      exact l_eq_i
    . simp only [List.get, Nat.add_eq, Nat.add_zero, List.length_cons, ne_eq]
      apply And.intro l'_eq_true ∘ And.intro l_eq_false
      constructor
      . simp only [l'] at l'_eq_true
        simp only [l_eq_i, addAssignment, l'_eq_true, ite_true, Array.get_modify_at_idx i_in_bounds, h1,
          l_eq_false, ite_false]
        apply addNeg_of_addPos_eq_both
      . constructor
        . simp only [l'] at l'_eq_true
          simp only [hasAssignment, l'_eq_true, ite_true] at h2
          simp only [hasAssignment, l_eq_false, ↓reduceIte, getElem!, l_eq_i, i_in_bounds,
            Array.get_eq_getElem, h1, addAssignment, l'_eq_true, hasNeg_of_addPos] at h
          exact unassigned_of_has_neither _ h2 h
        . intro k k_ne_j_succ k_ne_zero
          have k_eq_succ : ∃ k' : Nat, ∃ k'_succ_in_bounds : k' + 1 < (l :: acc.2.1).length, k = ⟨k' + 1, k'_succ_in_bounds⟩ := by
            have k_val_ne_zero : k.1 ≠ 0 := by
              intro k_eq_zero
              simp only [List.length_cons, ← k_eq_zero, ne_eq, not_true] at k_ne_zero
            rcases Nat.exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero k_val_ne_zero with ⟨k', k_eq_k'_succ⟩
            rw [Nat.succ_eq_add_one k'] at k_eq_k'_succ
            have k'_succ_in_bounds : k' + 1 < (l :: acc.2.1).length := by rw [← k_eq_k'_succ]; exact k.2
            apply Exists.intro k' ∘ Exists.intro k'_succ_in_bounds
            apply Fin.eq_of_val_eq
            exact k_eq_k'_succ
          rcases k_eq_succ with ⟨k', k'_succ_in_bounds, k_eq_succ⟩
          rw [k_eq_succ]
          simp only [List.get, Nat.add_eq, Nat.add_zero, ne_eq]
          have k'_in_bounds : k' < acc.2.1.length := by
            simp only [List.length_cons, Nat.succ_eq_add_one] at k'_succ_in_bounds
            exact Nat.lt_of_succ_lt_succ k'_succ_in_bounds
          have k'_ne_j : ⟨k', k'_in_bounds⟩ ≠ j := by
            simp only [k_eq_succ, List.length_cons, Fin.mk.injEq, Nat.succ.injEq] at k_ne_j_succ
            exact Fin.ne_of_val_ne k_ne_j_succ
          exact h3 ⟨k', k'_in_bounds⟩ k'_ne_j
Proof state after:
no goals