internlm/Lean-Github huggingface dataset:
Theorem: match_concat_EpsilonNFA_toAbstract
Proof state before:
α : Type
inst✝ : DecidableEq α
σ_0 σ_1 : Type
M_0 : EpsilonNFA α σ_0
M_1 : EpsilonNFA α σ_1
p_0 : σ_0
q_0 : ℕ
xs : List (ℕ ⊕ σ_0 ⊕ σ_1)
x : σ_0
a2_left : x ∈ M_0.accepting_state_list
a2_right_left : x = p_0
a2_right_right : List.map (Sum.inr ∘ Sum.inr) M_1.starting_state_list = xs
⊢ Sum.inl q_0 ∉ xs
Tactic:
simp only [← a2_right_right]
Proof state after:
α : Type
inst✝ : DecidableEq α
σ_0 σ_1 : Type
M_0 : EpsilonNFA α σ_0
M_1 : EpsilonNFA α σ_1
p_0 : σ_0
q_0 : ℕ
xs : List (ℕ ⊕ σ_0 ⊕ σ_1)
x : σ_0
a2_left : x ∈ M_0.accepting_state_list
a2_right_left : x = p_0
a2_right_right : List.map (Sum.inr ∘ Sum.inr) M_1.starting_state_list = xs
⊢ Sum.inl q_0 ∉ List.map (Sum.inr ∘ Sum.inr) M_1.starting_state_list
Theorem: match_concat_EpsilonNFA_toAbstract
Proof state before:
α : Type
inst✝ : DecidableEq α
σ_0 σ_1 : Type
M_0 : EpsilonNFA α σ_0
M_1 : EpsilonNFA α σ_1
p_0 : σ_0
q_0 : ℕ
xs : List (ℕ ⊕ σ_0 ⊕ σ_1)
x : σ_0
a2_left : x ∈ M_0.accepting_state_list
a2_right_left : x = p_0
a2_right_right : List.map (Sum.inr ∘ Sum.inr) M_1.starting_state_list = xs
⊢ Sum.inl q_0 ∉ List.map (Sum.inr ∘ Sum.inr) M_1.starting_state_list
Tactic:
simp
Proof state after:
no goals
Theorem: match_concat_EpsilonNFA_toAbstract
Proof state before:
α : Type
inst✝ : DecidableEq α
σ_0 σ_1 : Type
M_0 : EpsilonNFA α σ_0
M_1 : EpsilonNFA α σ_1
p_0 q_0 : σ_0
⊢ (∃ stop_state_list,
      { start_state := Sum.inr (Sum.inl p_0), stop_state_list := stop_state_list } ∈
          List.map
                (fun arrow =>
                  { start_state := Sum.inr arrow.start_state,
                    stop_state_list := List.map Sum.inr arrow.stop_state_list })
                (List.map
                  (fun arrow =>
                    { start_state := Sum.inl arrow.start_state,
                      stop_state_list := List.map Sum.inl arrow.stop_state_list })
                  M_0.epsilon_arrow_list) ++
              List.map
                (fun arrow =>
                  { start_state := Sum.inr arrow.start_state,
                    stop_state_list := List.map Sum.inr arrow.stop_state_list })
                (List.map
                  (fun arrow =>
                    { start_state := Sum.inr arrow.start_state,
                      stop_state_list := List.map Sum.inr arrow.stop_state_list })
                  M_1.epsilon_arrow_list) ++
            List.map
              (fun accepting_state =>
                { start_state := accepting_state,
                  stop_state_list := List.map Sum.inr (List.map Sum.inr M_1.starting_state_list) })
              (List.map Sum.inr (List.map Sum.inl M_0.accepting_state_list)) ∧
        Sum.inr (Sum.inl q_0) ∈ stop_state_list) =
    match (Sum.inr (Sum.inl p_0), Sum.inr (Sum.inl q_0)) with
    | (Sum.inr (Sum.inl p'), Sum.inr (Sum.inl q')) =>
      ∃ stop_state_list,
        { start_state := p', stop_state_list := stop_state_list } ∈ M_0.epsilon_arrow_list ∧ q' ∈ stop_state_list
    | (Sum.inr (Sum.inr p'), Sum.inr (Sum.inr q')) =>
      ∃ stop_state_list,
        { start_state := p', stop_state_list := stop_state_list } ∈ M_1.epsilon_arrow_list ∧ q' ∈ stop_state_list
    | (Sum.inr (Sum.inl p'), Sum.inr (Sum.inr q')) => p' ∈ M_0.accepting_state_list ∧ q' ∈ M_1.starting_state_list
    | x => False
Tactic:
case _ q_0 =>
  simp
  sorry
Proof state after:
no goals
Theorem: match_concat_EpsilonNFA_toAbstract
Proof state before:
α : Type
inst✝ : DecidableEq α
σ_0 σ_1 : Type
M_0 : EpsilonNFA α σ_0
M_1 : EpsilonNFA α σ_1
p_0 : σ_0
q_0 : σ_1
⊢ (∃ stop_state_list,
      { start_state := Sum.inr (Sum.inl p_0), stop_state_list := stop_state_list } ∈
          List.map
                (fun arrow =>
                  { start_state := Sum.inr arrow.start_state,
                    stop_state_list := List.map Sum.inr arrow.stop_state_list })
                (List.map
                  (fun arrow =>
                    { start_state := Sum.inl arrow.start_state,
                      stop_state_list := List.map Sum.inl arrow.stop_state_list })
                  M_0.epsilon_arrow_list) ++
              List.map
                (fun arrow =>
                  { start_state := Sum.inr arrow.start_state,
                    stop_state_list := List.map Sum.inr arrow.stop_state_list })
                (List.map
                  (fun arrow =>
                    { start_state := Sum.inr arrow.start_state,
                      stop_state_list := List.map Sum.inr arrow.stop_state_list })
                  M_1.epsilon_arrow_list) ++
            List.map
              (fun accepting_state =>
                { start_state := accepting_state,
                  stop_state_list := List.map Sum.inr (List.map Sum.inr M_1.starting_state_list) })
              (List.map Sum.inr (List.map Sum.inl M_0.accepting_state_list)) ∧
        Sum.inr (Sum.inr q_0) ∈ stop_state_list) =
    match (Sum.inr (Sum.inl p_0), Sum.inr (Sum.inr q_0)) with
    | (Sum.inr (Sum.inl p'), Sum.inr (Sum.inl q')) =>
      ∃ stop_state_list,
        { start_state := p', stop_state_list := stop_state_list } ∈ M_0.epsilon_arrow_list ∧ q' ∈ stop_state_list
    | (Sum.inr (Sum.inr p'), Sum.inr (Sum.inr q')) =>
      ∃ stop_state_list,
        { start_state := p', stop_state_list := stop_state_list } ∈ M_1.epsilon_arrow_list ∧ q' ∈ stop_state_list
    | (Sum.inr (Sum.inl p'), Sum.inr (Sum.inr q')) => p' ∈ M_0.accepting_state_list ∧ q' ∈ M_1.starting_state_list
    | x => False
Tactic:
case _ q_0 =>
  simp
  sorry
Proof state after:
no goals
Theorem: match_concat_EpsilonNFA_toAbstract
Proof state before:
α : Type
inst✝ : DecidableEq α
σ_0 σ_1 : Type
M_0 : EpsilonNFA α σ_0
M_1 : EpsilonNFA α σ_1
p_0 q_0 : σ_0
⊢ (∃ stop_state_list,
      { start_state := Sum.inr (Sum.inl p_0), stop_state_list := stop_state_list } ∈
          List.map
                (fun arrow =>
                  { start_state := Sum.inr arrow.start_state,
                    stop_state_list := List.map Sum.inr arrow.stop_state_list })
                (List.map
                  (fun arrow =>
                    { start_state := Sum.inl arrow.start_state,
                      stop_state_list := List.map Sum.inl arrow.stop_state_list })
                  M_0.epsilon_arrow_list) ++
              List.map
                (fun arrow =>
                  { start_state := Sum.inr arrow.start_state,
                    stop_state_list := List.map Sum.inr arrow.stop_state_list })
                (List.map
                  (fun arrow =>
                    { start_state := Sum.inr arrow.start_state,
                      stop_state_list := List.map Sum.inr arrow.stop_state_list })
                  M_1.epsilon_arrow_list) ++
            List.map
              (fun accepting_state =>
                { start_state := accepting_state,
                  stop_state_list := List.map Sum.inr (List.map Sum.inr M_1.starting_state_list) })
              (List.map Sum.inr (List.map Sum.inl M_0.accepting_state_list)) ∧
        Sum.inr (Sum.inl q_0) ∈ stop_state_list) =
    match (Sum.inr (Sum.inl p_0), Sum.inr (Sum.inl q_0)) with
    | (Sum.inr (Sum.inl p'), Sum.inr (Sum.inl q')) =>
      ∃ stop_state_list,
        { start_state := p', stop_state_list := stop_state_list } ∈ M_0.epsilon_arrow_list ∧ q' ∈ stop_state_list
    | (Sum.inr (Sum.inr p'), Sum.inr (Sum.inr q')) =>
      ∃ stop_state_list,
        { start_state := p', stop_state_list := stop_state_list } ∈ M_1.epsilon_arrow_list ∧ q' ∈ stop_state_list
    | (Sum.inr (Sum.inl p'), Sum.inr (Sum.inr q')) => p' ∈ M_0.accepting_state_list ∧ q' ∈ M_1.starting_state_list
    | x => False
Tactic:
simp
Proof state after:
α : Type
inst✝ : DecidableEq α
σ_0 σ_1 : Type
M_0 : EpsilonNFA α σ_0
M_1 : EpsilonNFA α σ_1
p_0 q_0 : σ_0
⊢ (∃ stop_state_list,
      ((∃ a ∈ M_0.epsilon_arrow_list,
            a.start_state = p_0 ∧ List.map (Sum.inr ∘ Sum.inl) a.stop_state_list = stop_state_list) ∨
          ∃ a ∈ M_0.accepting_state_list,
            a = p_0 ∧ List.map (Sum.inr ∘ Sum.inr) M_1.starting_state_list = stop_state_list) ∧
        Sum.inr (Sum.inl q_0) ∈ stop_state_list) ↔
    ∃ stop_state_list,
      { start_state := p_0, stop_state_list := stop_state_list } ∈ M_0.epsilon_arrow_list ∧ q_0 ∈ stop_state_list
Theorem: match_concat_EpsilonNFA_toAbstract
Proof state before:
α : Type
inst✝ : DecidableEq α
σ_0 σ_1 : Type
M_0 : EpsilonNFA α σ_0
M_1 : EpsilonNFA α σ_1
p_0 q_0 : σ_0
⊢ (∃ stop_state_list,
      ((∃ a ∈ M_0.epsilon_arrow_list,
            a.start_state = p_0 ∧ List.map (Sum.inr ∘ Sum.inl) a.stop_state_list = stop_state_list) ∨
          ∃ a ∈ M_0.accepting_state_list,
            a = p_0 ∧ List.map (Sum.inr ∘ Sum.inr) M_1.starting_state_list = stop_state_list) ∧
        Sum.inr (Sum.inl q_0) ∈ stop_state_list) ↔
    ∃ stop_state_list,
      { start_state := p_0, stop_state_list := stop_state_list } ∈ M_0.epsilon_arrow_list ∧ q_0 ∈ stop_state_list
Tactic:
sorry
Proof state after:
no goals
Theorem: match_concat_EpsilonNFA_toAbstract
Proof state before:
α : Type
inst✝ : DecidableEq α
σ_0 σ_1 : Type
M_0 : EpsilonNFA α σ_0
M_1 : EpsilonNFA α σ_1
p_0 : σ_0
q_0 : σ_1
⊢ (∃ stop_state_list,
      { start_state := Sum.inr (Sum.inl p_0), stop_state_list := stop_state_list } ∈
          List.map
                (fun arrow =>
                  { start_state := Sum.inr arrow.start_state,
                    stop_state_list := List.map Sum.inr arrow.stop_state_list })
                (List.map
                  (fun arrow =>
                    { start_state := Sum.inl arrow.start_state,
                      stop_state_list := List.map Sum.inl arrow.stop_state_list })
                  M_0.epsilon_arrow_list) ++
              List.map
                (fun arrow =>
                  { start_state := Sum.inr arrow.start_state,
                    stop_state_list := List.map Sum.inr arrow.stop_state_list })
                (List.map
                  (fun arrow =>
                    { start_state := Sum.inr arrow.start_state,
                      stop_state_list := List.map Sum.inr arrow.stop_state_list })
                  M_1.epsilon_arrow_list) ++
            List.map
              (fun accepting_state =>
                { start_state := accepting_state,
                  stop_state_list := List.map Sum.inr (List.map Sum.inr M_1.starting_state_list) })
              (List.map Sum.inr (List.map Sum.inl M_0.accepting_state_list)) ∧
        Sum.inr (Sum.inr q_0) ∈ stop_state_list) =
    match (Sum.inr (Sum.inl p_0), Sum.inr (Sum.inr q_0)) with
    | (Sum.inr (Sum.inl p'), Sum.inr (Sum.inl q')) =>
      ∃ stop_state_list,
        { start_state := p', stop_state_list := stop_state_list } ∈ M_0.epsilon_arrow_list ∧ q' ∈ stop_state_list
    | (Sum.inr (Sum.inr p'), Sum.inr (Sum.inr q')) =>
      ∃ stop_state_list,
        { start_state := p', stop_state_list := stop_state_list } ∈ M_1.epsilon_arrow_list ∧ q' ∈ stop_state_list
    | (Sum.inr (Sum.inl p'), Sum.inr (Sum.inr q')) => p' ∈ M_0.accepting_state_list ∧ q' ∈ M_1.starting_state_list
    | x => False
Tactic:
simp
Proof state after:
α : Type
inst✝ : DecidableEq α
σ_0 σ_1 : Type
M_0 : EpsilonNFA α σ_0
M_1 : EpsilonNFA α σ_1
p_0 : σ_0
q_0 : σ_1
⊢ (∃ stop_state_list,
      ((∃ a ∈ M_0.epsilon_arrow_list,
            a.start_state = p_0 ∧ List.map (Sum.inr ∘ Sum.inl) a.stop_state_list = stop_state_list) ∨
          ∃ a ∈ M_0.accepting_state_list,
            a = p_0 ∧ List.map (Sum.inr ∘ Sum.inr) M_1.starting_state_list = stop_state_list) ∧
        Sum.inr (Sum.inr q_0) ∈ stop_state_list) ↔
    p_0 ∈ M_0.accepting_state_list ∧ q_0 ∈ M_1.starting_state_list
Theorem: match_concat_EpsilonNFA_toAbstract
Proof state before:
α : Type
inst✝ : DecidableEq α
σ_0 σ_1 : Type
M_0 : EpsilonNFA α σ_0
M_1 : EpsilonNFA α σ_1
p_0 : σ_0
q_0 : σ_1
⊢ (∃ stop_state_list,
      ((∃ a ∈ M_0.epsilon_arrow_list,
            a.start_state = p_0 ∧ List.map (Sum.inr ∘ Sum.inl) a.stop_state_list = stop_state_list) ∨
          ∃ a ∈ M_0.accepting_state_list,
            a = p_0 ∧ List.map (Sum.inr ∘ Sum.inr) M_1.starting_state_list = stop_state_list) ∧
        Sum.inr (Sum.inr q_0) ∈ stop_state_list) ↔
    p_0 ∈ M_0.accepting_state_list ∧ q_0 ∈ M_1.starting_state_list
Tactic:
sorry
Proof state after:
no goals
Theorem: match_concat_EpsilonNFA_toAbstract
Proof state before:
α : Type
inst✝ : DecidableEq α
σ_0 σ_1 : Type
M_0 : EpsilonNFA α σ_0
M_1 : EpsilonNFA α σ_1
p_0 : σ_1
q_0 : ℕ
⊢ (∃ stop_state_list,
      { start_state := Sum.inr (Sum.inr p_0), stop_state_list := stop_state_list } ∈
          List.map
                (fun arrow =>
                  { start_state := Sum.inr arrow.start_state,
                    stop_state_list := List.map Sum.inr arrow.stop_state_list })
                (List.map
                  (fun arrow =>
                    { start_state := Sum.inl arrow.start_state,
                      stop_state_list := List.map Sum.inl arrow.stop_state_list })
                  M_0.epsilon_arrow_list) ++
              List.map
                (fun arrow =>
                  { start_state := Sum.inr arrow.start_state,
                    stop_state_list := List.map Sum.inr arrow.stop_state_list })
                (List.map
                  (fun arrow =>
                    { start_state := Sum.inr arrow.start_state,
                      stop_state_list := List.map Sum.inr arrow.stop_state_list })
                  M_1.epsilon_arrow_list) ++
            List.map
              (fun accepting_state =>
                { start_state := accepting_state,
                  stop_state_list := List.map Sum.inr (List.map Sum.inr M_1.starting_state_list) })
              (List.map Sum.inr (List.map Sum.inl M_0.accepting_state_list)) ∧
        Sum.inl q_0 ∈ stop_state_list) =
    match (Sum.inr (Sum.inr p_0), Sum.inl q_0) with
    | (Sum.inr (Sum.inl p'), Sum.inr (Sum.inl q')) =>
      ∃ stop_state_list,
        { start_state := p', stop_state_list := stop_state_list } ∈ M_0.epsilon_arrow_list ∧ q' ∈ stop_state_list
    | (Sum.inr (Sum.inr p'), Sum.inr (Sum.inr q')) =>
      ∃ stop_state_list,
        { start_state := p', stop_state_list := stop_state_list } ∈ M_1.epsilon_arrow_list ∧ q' ∈ stop_state_list
    | (Sum.inr (Sum.inl p'), Sum.inr (Sum.inr q')) => p' ∈ M_0.accepting_state_list ∧ q' ∈ M_1.starting_state_list
    | x => False
Tactic:
case _ q_0 =>
  simp
  intro xs x a1 a2 a3
  simp only [← a3]
  simp
Proof state after:
no goals
Theorem: match_concat_EpsilonNFA_toAbstract
Proof state before:
α : Type
inst✝ : DecidableEq α
σ_0 σ_1 : Type
M_0 : EpsilonNFA α σ_0
M_1 : EpsilonNFA α σ_1
p_0 : σ_1
q_0 : σ_0 ⊕ σ_1
⊢ (∃ stop_state_list,
      { start_state := Sum.inr (Sum.inr p_0), stop_state_list := stop_state_list } ∈
          List.map
                (fun arrow =>
                  { start_state := Sum.inr arrow.start_state,
                    stop_state_list := List.map Sum.inr arrow.stop_state_list })
                (List.map
                  (fun arrow =>
                    { start_state := Sum.inl arrow.start_state,
                      stop_state_list := List.map Sum.inl arrow.stop_state_list })
                  M_0.epsilon_arrow_list) ++
              List.map
                (fun arrow =>
                  { start_state := Sum.inr arrow.start_state,
                    stop_state_list := List.map Sum.inr arrow.stop_state_list })
                (List.map
                  (fun arrow =>
                    { start_state := Sum.inr arrow.start_state,
                      stop_state_list := List.map Sum.inr arrow.stop_state_list })
                  M_1.epsilon_arrow_list) ++
            List.map
              (fun accepting_state =>
                { start_state := accepting_state,
                  stop_state_list := List.map Sum.inr (List.map Sum.inr M_1.starting_state_list) })
              (List.map Sum.inr (List.map Sum.inl M_0.accepting_state_list)) ∧
        Sum.inr q_0 ∈ stop_state_list) =
    match (Sum.inr (Sum.inr p_0), Sum.inr q_0) with
    | (Sum.inr (Sum.inl p'), Sum.inr (Sum.inl q')) =>
      ∃ stop_state_list,
        { start_state := p', stop_state_list := stop_state_list } ∈ M_0.epsilon_arrow_list ∧ q' ∈ stop_state_list
    | (Sum.inr (Sum.inr p'), Sum.inr (Sum.inr q')) =>
      ∃ stop_state_list,
        { start_state := p', stop_state_list := stop_state_list } ∈ M_1.epsilon_arrow_list ∧ q' ∈ stop_state_list
    | (Sum.inr (Sum.inl p'), Sum.inr (Sum.inr q')) => p' ∈ M_0.accepting_state_list ∧ q' ∈ M_1.starting_state_list
    | x => False
Tactic:
case _ q_0 =>
  cases q_0
  case _ q_0 =>
    simp
    intro xs x a1 a2 a3
    simp only [← a3]
    simp
  case _ q_0 =>
    simp
    sorry
Proof state after:
no goals
Theorem: match_concat_EpsilonNFA_toAbstract
Proof state before:
α : Type
inst✝ : DecidableEq α
σ_0 σ_1 : Type
M_0 : EpsilonNFA α σ_0
M_1 : EpsilonNFA α σ_1
p_0 : σ_1
q_0 : ℕ
⊢ (∃ stop_state_list,
      { start_state := Sum.inr (Sum.inr p_0), stop_state_list := stop_state_list } ∈
          List.map
                (fun arrow =>
                  { start_state := Sum.inr arrow.start_state,
                    stop_state_list := List.map Sum.inr arrow.stop_state_list })
                (List.map
                  (fun arrow =>
                    { start_state := Sum.inl arrow.start_state,
                      stop_state_list := List.map Sum.inl arrow.stop_state_list })
                  M_0.epsilon_arrow_list) ++
              List.map
                (fun arrow =>
                  { start_state := Sum.inr arrow.start_state,
                    stop_state_list := List.map Sum.inr arrow.stop_state_list })
                (List.map
                  (fun arrow =>
                    { start_state := Sum.inr arrow.start_state,
                      stop_state_list := List.map Sum.inr arrow.stop_state_list })
                  M_1.epsilon_arrow_list) ++
            List.map
              (fun accepting_state =>
                { start_state := accepting_state,
                  stop_state_list := List.map Sum.inr (List.map Sum.inr M_1.starting_state_list) })
              (List.map Sum.inr (List.map Sum.inl M_0.accepting_state_list)) ∧
        Sum.inl q_0 ∈ stop_state_list) =
    match (Sum.inr (Sum.inr p_0), Sum.inl q_0) with
    | (Sum.inr (Sum.inl p'), Sum.inr (Sum.inl q')) =>
      ∃ stop_state_list,
        { start_state := p', stop_state_list := stop_state_list } ∈ M_0.epsilon_arrow_list ∧ q' ∈ stop_state_list
    | (Sum.inr (Sum.inr p'), Sum.inr (Sum.inr q')) =>
      ∃ stop_state_list,
        { start_state := p', stop_state_list := stop_state_list } ∈ M_1.epsilon_arrow_list ∧ q' ∈ stop_state_list
    | (Sum.inr (Sum.inl p'), Sum.inr (Sum.inr q')) => p' ∈ M_0.accepting_state_list ∧ q' ∈ M_1.starting_state_list
    | x => False
Tactic:
simp
Proof state after:
α : Type
inst✝ : DecidableEq α
σ_0 σ_1 : Type
M_0 : EpsilonNFA α σ_0
M_1 : EpsilonNFA α σ_1
p_0 : σ_1
q_0 : ℕ
⊢ ∀ (x : List (ℕ ⊕ σ_0 ⊕ σ_1)),
    ∀ x_1 ∈ M_1.epsilon_arrow_list,
      x_1.start_state = p_0 → List.map (Sum.inr ∘ Sum.inr) x_1.stop_state_list = x → Sum.inl q_0 ∉ x
Theorem: match_concat_EpsilonNFA_toAbstract
Proof state before:
α : Type
inst✝ : DecidableEq α
σ_0 σ_1 : Type
M_0 : EpsilonNFA α σ_0
M_1 : EpsilonNFA α σ_1
p_0 : σ_1
q_0 : ℕ
⊢ ∀ (x : List (ℕ ⊕ σ_0 ⊕ σ_1)),
    ∀ x_1 ∈ M_1.epsilon_arrow_list,
      x_1.start_state = p_0 → List.map (Sum.inr ∘ Sum.inr) x_1.stop_state_list = x → Sum.inl q_0 ∉ x
Tactic:
intro xs x a1 a2 a3
Proof state after:
α : Type
inst✝ : DecidableEq α
σ_0 σ_1 : Type
M_0 : EpsilonNFA α σ_0
M_1 : EpsilonNFA α σ_1
p_0 : σ_1
q_0 : ℕ
xs : List (ℕ ⊕ σ_0 ⊕ σ_1)
x : EpsilonArrow σ_1
a1 : x ∈ M_1.epsilon_arrow_list
a2 : x.start_state = p_0
a3 : List.map (Sum.inr ∘ Sum.inr) x.stop_state_list = xs
⊢ Sum.inl q_0 ∉ xs
Theorem: match_concat_EpsilonNFA_toAbstract
Proof state before:
α : Type
inst✝ : DecidableEq α
σ_0 σ_1 : Type
M_0 : EpsilonNFA α σ_0
M_1 : EpsilonNFA α σ_1
p_0 : σ_1
q_0 : ℕ
xs : List (ℕ ⊕ σ_0 ⊕ σ_1)
x : EpsilonArrow σ_1
a1 : x ∈ M_1.epsilon_arrow_list
a2 : x.start_state = p_0
a3 : List.map (Sum.inr ∘ Sum.inr) x.stop_state_list = xs
⊢ Sum.inl q_0 ∉ xs
Tactic:
simp only [← a3]
Proof state after:
α : Type
inst✝ : DecidableEq α
σ_0 σ_1 : Type
M_0 : EpsilonNFA α σ_0
M_1 : EpsilonNFA α σ_1
p_0 : σ_1
q_0 : ℕ
xs : List (ℕ ⊕ σ_0 ⊕ σ_1)
x : EpsilonArrow σ_1
a1 : x ∈ M_1.epsilon_arrow_list
a2 : x.start_state = p_0
a3 : List.map (Sum.inr ∘ Sum.inr) x.stop_state_list = xs
⊢ Sum.inl q_0 ∉ List.map (Sum.inr ∘ Sum.inr) x.stop_state_list
Theorem: match_concat_EpsilonNFA_toAbstract
Proof state before:
α : Type
inst✝ : DecidableEq α
σ_0 σ_1 : Type
M_0 : EpsilonNFA α σ_0
M_1 : EpsilonNFA α σ_1
p_0 : σ_1
q_0 : ℕ
xs : List (ℕ ⊕ σ_0 ⊕ σ_1)
x : EpsilonArrow σ_1
a1 : x ∈ M_1.epsilon_arrow_list
a2 : x.start_state = p_0
a3 : List.map (Sum.inr ∘ Sum.inr) x.stop_state_list = xs
⊢ Sum.inl q_0 ∉ List.map (Sum.inr ∘ Sum.inr) x.stop_state_list
Tactic:
simp
Proof state after:
no goals
Theorem: match_concat_EpsilonNFA_toAbstract
Proof state before:
α : Type
inst✝ : DecidableEq α
σ_0 σ_1 : Type
M_0 : EpsilonNFA α σ_0
M_1 : EpsilonNFA α σ_1
p_0 : σ_1
q_0 : σ_0
⊢ (∃ stop_state_list,
      { start_state := Sum.inr (Sum.inr p_0), stop_state_list := stop_state_list } ∈
          List.map
                (fun arrow =>
                  { start_state := Sum.inr arrow.start_state,
                    stop_state_list := List.map Sum.inr arrow.stop_state_list })
                (List.map
                  (fun arrow =>
                    { start_state := Sum.inl arrow.start_state,
                      stop_state_list := List.map Sum.inl arrow.stop_state_list })
                  M_0.epsilon_arrow_list) ++
              List.map
                (fun arrow =>
                  { start_state := Sum.inr arrow.start_state,
                    stop_state_list := List.map Sum.inr arrow.stop_state_list })
                (List.map
                  (fun arrow =>
                    { start_state := Sum.inr arrow.start_state,
                      stop_state_list := List.map Sum.inr arrow.stop_state_list })
                  M_1.epsilon_arrow_list) ++
            List.map
              (fun accepting_state =>
                { start_state := accepting_state,
                  stop_state_list := List.map Sum.inr (List.map Sum.inr M_1.starting_state_list) })
              (List.map Sum.inr (List.map Sum.inl M_0.accepting_state_list)) ∧
        Sum.inr (Sum.inl q_0) ∈ stop_state_list) =
    match (Sum.inr (Sum.inr p_0), Sum.inr (Sum.inl q_0)) with
    | (Sum.inr (Sum.inl p'), Sum.inr (Sum.inl q')) =>
      ∃ stop_state_list,
        { start_state := p', stop_state_list := stop_state_list } ∈ M_0.epsilon_arrow_list ∧ q' ∈ stop_state_list
    | (Sum.inr (Sum.inr p'), Sum.inr (Sum.inr q')) =>
      ∃ stop_state_list,
        { start_state := p', stop_state_list := stop_state_list } ∈ M_1.epsilon_arrow_list ∧ q' ∈ stop_state_list
    | (Sum.inr (Sum.inl p'), Sum.inr (Sum.inr q')) => p' ∈ M_0.accepting_state_list ∧ q' ∈ M_1.starting_state_list
    | x => False
Tactic:
case _ q_0 =>
  simp
  intro xs x a1 a2 a3
  simp only [← a3]
  simp
Proof state after:
no goals