internlm/Lean-Github huggingface dataset:
Theorem: LRAT.DefaultFormula.confirmRupHint_preserves_invariant_helper
Proof state before:
case isTrue
n : Nat
f : DefaultFormula n
f_assignments_size : f.assignments.size = n
acc : Array Assignment × List (Literal (PosFin n)) × Bool × Bool
hsize : acc.fst.size = n
l : Literal (PosFin n)
ih : f.derivedLits_invariant f_assignments_size acc.fst hsize acc.snd.fst
hsize'✝ : (acc.fst.modify l.fst.val (addAssignment l.snd)).size = n :=
  Eq.mpr (id (congrArg (fun _a => _a = n) Array.modify_preserves_size)) hsize
i : Fin n
i_in_bounds : ↑i < acc.fst.size
l_in_bounds : l.fst.val < acc.fst.size
j1 j2 : Fin acc.snd.fst.length
j1_eq_i : (acc.snd.fst.get j1).fst.val = ↑i
j2_eq_i : (acc.snd.fst.get j2).fst.val = ↑i
j1_eq_true : (acc.snd.fst.get j1).snd = true
j2_eq_false : (acc.snd.fst.get j2).snd = false
h1 : acc.fst[↑i] = both
h2 : f.assignments[↑i] = unassigned
h3 : ∀ (k : Fin acc.snd.fst.length), k ≠ j1 → k ≠ j2 → (acc.snd.fst.get k).fst.val ≠ ↑i
j1_succ_in_bounds : ↑j1 + 1 < (l :: acc.snd.fst).length
j2_succ_in_bounds : ↑j2 + 1 < (l :: acc.snd.fst).length
j1_succ : Fin (l :: acc.snd.fst).length := ⟨↑j1 + 1, j1_succ_in_bounds⟩
j2_succ : Fin (l :: acc.snd.fst).length := ⟨↑j2 + 1, j2_succ_in_bounds⟩
l_eq_i : l.fst.val = ↑i
h✝ : l.snd = true
h : acc.fst[l.fst.val]!.hasPosAssignment = false
⊢ False

case isFalse
n : Nat
f : DefaultFormula n
f_assignments_size : f.assignments.size = n
acc : Array Assignment × List (Literal (PosFin n)) × Bool × Bool
hsize : acc.fst.size = n
l : Literal (PosFin n)
ih : f.derivedLits_invariant f_assignments_size acc.fst hsize acc.snd.fst
hsize'✝ : (acc.fst.modify l.fst.val (addAssignment l.snd)).size = n :=
  Eq.mpr (id (congrArg (fun _a => _a = n) Array.modify_preserves_size)) hsize
i : Fin n
i_in_bounds : ↑i < acc.fst.size
l_in_bounds : l.fst.val < acc.fst.size
j1 j2 : Fin acc.snd.fst.length
j1_eq_i : (acc.snd.fst.get j1).fst.val = ↑i
j2_eq_i : (acc.snd.fst.get j2).fst.val = ↑i
j1_eq_true : (acc.snd.fst.get j1).snd = true
j2_eq_false : (acc.snd.fst.get j2).snd = false
h1 : acc.fst[↑i] = both
h2 : f.assignments[↑i] = unassigned
h3 : ∀ (k : Fin acc.snd.fst.length), k ≠ j1 → k ≠ j2 → (acc.snd.fst.get k).fst.val ≠ ↑i
j1_succ_in_bounds : ↑j1 + 1 < (l :: acc.snd.fst).length
j2_succ_in_bounds : ↑j2 + 1 < (l :: acc.snd.fst).length
j1_succ : Fin (l :: acc.snd.fst).length := ⟨↑j1 + 1, j1_succ_in_bounds⟩
j2_succ : Fin (l :: acc.snd.fst).length := ⟨↑j2 + 1, j2_succ_in_bounds⟩
l_eq_i : l.fst.val = ↑i
h✝ : ¬l.snd = true
h : acc.fst[l.fst.val]!.hasNegAssignment = false
⊢ False
Tactic:
all_goals
  simp (config := {decide := true}) [getElem!, l_eq_i, i_in_bounds, h1] at h
Proof state after:
no goals
Theorem: LRAT.DefaultFormula.confirmRupHint_preserves_invariant_helper
Proof state before:
case isFalse
n : Nat
f : DefaultFormula n
f_assignments_size : f.assignments.size = n
acc : Array Assignment × List (Literal (PosFin n)) × Bool × Bool
hsize : acc.fst.size = n
l : Literal (PosFin n)
ih : f.derivedLits_invariant f_assignments_size acc.fst hsize acc.snd.fst
hsize'✝ : (acc.fst.modify l.fst.val (addAssignment l.snd)).size = n :=
  Eq.mpr (id (congrArg (fun _a => _a = n) Array.modify_preserves_size)) hsize
i : Fin n
i_in_bounds : ↑i < acc.fst.size
l_in_bounds : l.fst.val < acc.fst.size
j1 j2 : Fin acc.snd.fst.length
j1_eq_i : (acc.snd.fst.get j1).fst.val = ↑i
j2_eq_i : (acc.snd.fst.get j2).fst.val = ↑i
j1_eq_true : (acc.snd.fst.get j1).snd = true
j2_eq_false : (acc.snd.fst.get j2).snd = false
h1 : acc.fst[↑i] = both
h2 : f.assignments[↑i] = unassigned
h3 : ∀ (k : Fin acc.snd.fst.length), k ≠ j1 → k ≠ j2 → (acc.snd.fst.get k).fst.val ≠ ↑i
j1_succ_in_bounds : ↑j1 + 1 < (l :: acc.snd.fst).length
j2_succ_in_bounds : ↑j2 + 1 < (l :: acc.snd.fst).length
j1_succ : Fin (l :: acc.snd.fst).length := ⟨↑j1 + 1, j1_succ_in_bounds⟩
j2_succ : Fin (l :: acc.snd.fst).length := ⟨↑j2 + 1, j2_succ_in_bounds⟩
l_eq_i : l.fst.val = ↑i
h✝ : ¬l.snd = true
h : acc.fst[l.fst.val]!.hasNegAssignment = false
⊢ False
Tactic:
simp (config := {decide := true}) [getElem!, l_eq_i, i_in_bounds, h1] at h
Proof state after:
no goals
Theorem: LRAT.DefaultFormula.confirmRupHint_preserves_invariant_helper
Proof state before:
case inr.inr.intro.intro.intro.intro.intro.intro.intro.intro.left
n : Nat
f : DefaultFormula n
f_assignments_size : f.assignments.size = n
acc : Array Assignment × List (Literal (PosFin n)) × Bool × Bool
hsize : acc.fst.size = n
l : Literal (PosFin n)
ih : f.derivedLits_invariant f_assignments_size acc.fst hsize acc.snd.fst
h : ¬hasAssignment l.snd acc.fst[l.fst.val]! = true
hsize'✝ : (acc.fst.modify l.fst.val (addAssignment l.snd)).size = n :=
  Eq.mpr (id (congrArg (fun _a => _a = n) Array.modify_preserves_size)) hsize
i : Fin n
i_in_bounds : ↑i < acc.fst.size
l_in_bounds : l.fst.val < acc.fst.size
j1 j2 : Fin acc.snd.fst.length
j1_eq_i : (acc.snd.fst.get j1).fst.val = ↑i
j2_eq_i : (acc.snd.fst.get j2).fst.val = ↑i
j1_eq_true : (acc.snd.fst.get j1).snd = true
j2_eq_false : (acc.snd.fst.get j2).snd = false
h1 : acc.fst[↑i] = both
h2 : f.assignments[↑i] = unassigned
h3 : ∀ (k : Fin acc.snd.fst.length), k ≠ j1 → k ≠ j2 → (acc.snd.fst.get k).fst.val ≠ ↑i
j1_succ_in_bounds : ↑j1 + 1 < (l :: acc.snd.fst).length
j2_succ_in_bounds : ↑j2 + 1 < (l :: acc.snd.fst).length
j1_succ : Fin (l :: acc.snd.fst).length := ⟨↑j1 + 1, j1_succ_in_bounds⟩
j2_succ : Fin (l :: acc.snd.fst).length := ⟨↑j2 + 1, j2_succ_in_bounds⟩
l_ne_i : l.fst.val ≠ ↑i
⊢ (acc.fst.modify l.fst.val (addAssignment l.snd))[↑i] = both
Tactic:
rw [Array.get_modify_unchanged l_in_bounds i_in_bounds _ l_ne_i]
Proof state after:
case inr.inr.intro.intro.intro.intro.intro.intro.intro.intro.left
n : Nat
f : DefaultFormula n
f_assignments_size : f.assignments.size = n
acc : Array Assignment × List (Literal (PosFin n)) × Bool × Bool
hsize : acc.fst.size = n
l : Literal (PosFin n)
ih : f.derivedLits_invariant f_assignments_size acc.fst hsize acc.snd.fst
h : ¬hasAssignment l.snd acc.fst[l.fst.val]! = true
hsize'✝ : (acc.fst.modify l.fst.val (addAssignment l.snd)).size = n :=
  Eq.mpr (id (congrArg (fun _a => _a = n) Array.modify_preserves_size)) hsize
i : Fin n
i_in_bounds : ↑i < acc.fst.size
l_in_bounds : l.fst.val < acc.fst.size
j1 j2 : Fin acc.snd.fst.length
j1_eq_i : (acc.snd.fst.get j1).fst.val = ↑i
j2_eq_i : (acc.snd.fst.get j2).fst.val = ↑i
j1_eq_true : (acc.snd.fst.get j1).snd = true
j2_eq_false : (acc.snd.fst.get j2).snd = false
h1 : acc.fst[↑i] = both
h2 : f.assignments[↑i] = unassigned
h3 : ∀ (k : Fin acc.snd.fst.length), k ≠ j1 → k ≠ j2 → (acc.snd.fst.get k).fst.val ≠ ↑i
j1_succ_in_bounds : ↑j1 + 1 < (l :: acc.snd.fst).length
j2_succ_in_bounds : ↑j2 + 1 < (l :: acc.snd.fst).length
j1_succ : Fin (l :: acc.snd.fst).length := ⟨↑j1 + 1, j1_succ_in_bounds⟩
j2_succ : Fin (l :: acc.snd.fst).length := ⟨↑j2 + 1, j2_succ_in_bounds⟩
l_ne_i : l.fst.val ≠ ↑i
⊢ acc.fst[↑i] = both
Theorem: LRAT.DefaultFormula.confirmRupHint_preserves_invariant_helper
Proof state before:
case inr.inr.intro.intro.intro.intro.intro.intro.intro.intro.left
n : Nat
f : DefaultFormula n
f_assignments_size : f.assignments.size = n
acc : Array Assignment × List (Literal (PosFin n)) × Bool × Bool
hsize : acc.fst.size = n
l : Literal (PosFin n)
ih : f.derivedLits_invariant f_assignments_size acc.fst hsize acc.snd.fst
h : ¬hasAssignment l.snd acc.fst[l.fst.val]! = true
hsize'✝ : (acc.fst.modify l.fst.val (addAssignment l.snd)).size = n :=
  Eq.mpr (id (congrArg (fun _a => _a = n) Array.modify_preserves_size)) hsize
i : Fin n
i_in_bounds : ↑i < acc.fst.size
l_in_bounds : l.fst.val < acc.fst.size
j1 j2 : Fin acc.snd.fst.length
j1_eq_i : (acc.snd.fst.get j1).fst.val = ↑i
j2_eq_i : (acc.snd.fst.get j2).fst.val = ↑i
j1_eq_true : (acc.snd.fst.get j1).snd = true
j2_eq_false : (acc.snd.fst.get j2).snd = false
h1 : acc.fst[↑i] = both
h2 : f.assignments[↑i] = unassigned
h3 : ∀ (k : Fin acc.snd.fst.length), k ≠ j1 → k ≠ j2 → (acc.snd.fst.get k).fst.val ≠ ↑i
j1_succ_in_bounds : ↑j1 + 1 < (l :: acc.snd.fst).length
j2_succ_in_bounds : ↑j2 + 1 < (l :: acc.snd.fst).length
j1_succ : Fin (l :: acc.snd.fst).length := ⟨↑j1 + 1, j1_succ_in_bounds⟩
j2_succ : Fin (l :: acc.snd.fst).length := ⟨↑j2 + 1, j2_succ_in_bounds⟩
l_ne_i : l.fst.val ≠ ↑i
⊢ acc.fst[↑i] = both
Tactic:
exact h1
Proof state after:
no goals
Theorem: LRAT.DefaultFormula.confirmRupHint_preserves_invariant_helper
Proof state before:
case inr.inr.intro.intro.intro.intro.intro.intro.intro.intro.right.left
n : Nat
f : DefaultFormula n
f_assignments_size : f.assignments.size = n
acc : Array Assignment × List (Literal (PosFin n)) × Bool × Bool
hsize : acc.fst.size = n
l : Literal (PosFin n)
ih : f.derivedLits_invariant f_assignments_size acc.fst hsize acc.snd.fst
h : ¬hasAssignment l.snd acc.fst[l.fst.val]! = true
hsize'✝ : (acc.fst.modify l.fst.val (addAssignment l.snd)).size = n :=
  Eq.mpr (id (congrArg (fun _a => _a = n) Array.modify_preserves_size)) hsize
i : Fin n
i_in_bounds : ↑i < acc.fst.size
l_in_bounds : l.fst.val < acc.fst.size
j1 j2 : Fin acc.snd.fst.length
j1_eq_i : (acc.snd.fst.get j1).fst.val = ↑i
j2_eq_i : (acc.snd.fst.get j2).fst.val = ↑i
j1_eq_true : (acc.snd.fst.get j1).snd = true
j2_eq_false : (acc.snd.fst.get j2).snd = false
h1 : acc.fst[↑i] = both
h2 : f.assignments[↑i] = unassigned
h3 : ∀ (k : Fin acc.snd.fst.length), k ≠ j1 → k ≠ j2 → (acc.snd.fst.get k).fst.val ≠ ↑i
j1_succ_in_bounds : ↑j1 + 1 < (l :: acc.snd.fst).length
j2_succ_in_bounds : ↑j2 + 1 < (l :: acc.snd.fst).length
j1_succ : Fin (l :: acc.snd.fst).length := ⟨↑j1 + 1, j1_succ_in_bounds⟩
j2_succ : Fin (l :: acc.snd.fst).length := ⟨↑j2 + 1, j2_succ_in_bounds⟩
l_ne_i : l.fst.val ≠ ↑i
⊢ f.assignments[↑i] = unassigned
Tactic:
exact h2
Proof state after:
no goals
Theorem: LRAT.DefaultFormula.confirmRupHint_preserves_invariant_helper
Proof state before:
case inr.inr.intro.intro.intro.intro.intro.intro.intro.intro.right.right
n : Nat
f : DefaultFormula n
f_assignments_size : f.assignments.size = n
acc : Array Assignment × List (Literal (PosFin n)) × Bool × Bool
hsize : acc.fst.size = n
l : Literal (PosFin n)
ih : f.derivedLits_invariant f_assignments_size acc.fst hsize acc.snd.fst
h : ¬hasAssignment l.snd acc.fst[l.fst.val]! = true
hsize'✝ : (acc.fst.modify l.fst.val (addAssignment l.snd)).size = n :=
  Eq.mpr (id (congrArg (fun _a => _a = n) Array.modify_preserves_size)) hsize
i : Fin n
i_in_bounds : ↑i < acc.fst.size
l_in_bounds : l.fst.val < acc.fst.size
j1 j2 : Fin acc.snd.fst.length
j1_eq_i : (acc.snd.fst.get j1).fst.val = ↑i
j2_eq_i : (acc.snd.fst.get j2).fst.val = ↑i
j1_eq_true : (acc.snd.fst.get j1).snd = true
j2_eq_false : (acc.snd.fst.get j2).snd = false
h1 : acc.fst[↑i] = both
h2 : f.assignments[↑i] = unassigned
h3 : ∀ (k : Fin acc.snd.fst.length), k ≠ j1 → k ≠ j2 → (acc.snd.fst.get k).fst.val ≠ ↑i
j1_succ_in_bounds : ↑j1 + 1 < (l :: acc.snd.fst).length
j2_succ_in_bounds : ↑j2 + 1 < (l :: acc.snd.fst).length
j1_succ : Fin (l :: acc.snd.fst).length := ⟨↑j1 + 1, j1_succ_in_bounds⟩
j2_succ : Fin (l :: acc.snd.fst).length := ⟨↑j2 + 1, j2_succ_in_bounds⟩
l_ne_i : l.fst.val ≠ ↑i
⊢ ∀ (k : Fin acc.snd.fst.length.succ), ¬k = j1_succ → ¬k = j2_succ → ¬((l :: acc.snd.fst).get k).fst.val = ↑i
Tactic:
intro k k_ne_j1_succ k_ne_j2_succ
Proof state after:
case inr.inr.intro.intro.intro.intro.intro.intro.intro.intro.right.right
n : Nat
f : DefaultFormula n
f_assignments_size : f.assignments.size = n
acc : Array Assignment × List (Literal (PosFin n)) × Bool × Bool
hsize : acc.fst.size = n
l : Literal (PosFin n)
ih : f.derivedLits_invariant f_assignments_size acc.fst hsize acc.snd.fst
h : ¬hasAssignment l.snd acc.fst[l.fst.val]! = true
hsize'✝ : (acc.fst.modify l.fst.val (addAssignment l.snd)).size = n :=
  Eq.mpr (id (congrArg (fun _a => _a = n) Array.modify_preserves_size)) hsize
i : Fin n
i_in_bounds : ↑i < acc.fst.size
l_in_bounds : l.fst.val < acc.fst.size
j1 j2 : Fin acc.snd.fst.length
j1_eq_i : (acc.snd.fst.get j1).fst.val = ↑i
j2_eq_i : (acc.snd.fst.get j2).fst.val = ↑i
j1_eq_true : (acc.snd.fst.get j1).snd = true
j2_eq_false : (acc.snd.fst.get j2).snd = false
h1 : acc.fst[↑i] = both
h2 : f.assignments[↑i] = unassigned
h3 : ∀ (k : Fin acc.snd.fst.length), k ≠ j1 → k ≠ j2 → (acc.snd.fst.get k).fst.val ≠ ↑i
j1_succ_in_bounds : ↑j1 + 1 < (l :: acc.snd.fst).length
j2_succ_in_bounds : ↑j2 + 1 < (l :: acc.snd.fst).length
j1_succ : Fin (l :: acc.snd.fst).length := ⟨↑j1 + 1, j1_succ_in_bounds⟩
j2_succ : Fin (l :: acc.snd.fst).length := ⟨↑j2 + 1, j2_succ_in_bounds⟩
l_ne_i : l.fst.val ≠ ↑i
k : Fin acc.snd.fst.length.succ
k_ne_j1_succ : ¬k = j1_succ
k_ne_j2_succ : ¬k = j2_succ
⊢ ¬((l :: acc.snd.fst).get k).fst.val = ↑i
Theorem: LRAT.DefaultFormula.confirmRupHint_preserves_invariant_helper
Proof state before:
case inr.inr.intro.intro.intro.intro.intro.intro.intro.intro.right.right
n : Nat
f : DefaultFormula n
f_assignments_size : f.assignments.size = n
acc : Array Assignment × List (Literal (PosFin n)) × Bool × Bool
hsize : acc.fst.size = n
l : Literal (PosFin n)
ih : f.derivedLits_invariant f_assignments_size acc.fst hsize acc.snd.fst
h : ¬hasAssignment l.snd acc.fst[l.fst.val]! = true
hsize'✝ : (acc.fst.modify l.fst.val (addAssignment l.snd)).size = n :=
  Eq.mpr (id (congrArg (fun _a => _a = n) Array.modify_preserves_size)) hsize
i : Fin n
i_in_bounds : ↑i < acc.fst.size
l_in_bounds : l.fst.val < acc.fst.size
j1 j2 : Fin acc.snd.fst.length
j1_eq_i : (acc.snd.fst.get j1).fst.val = ↑i
j2_eq_i : (acc.snd.fst.get j2).fst.val = ↑i
j1_eq_true : (acc.snd.fst.get j1).snd = true
j2_eq_false : (acc.snd.fst.get j2).snd = false
h1 : acc.fst[↑i] = both
h2 : f.assignments[↑i] = unassigned
h3 : ∀ (k : Fin acc.snd.fst.length), k ≠ j1 → k ≠ j2 → (acc.snd.fst.get k).fst.val ≠ ↑i
j1_succ_in_bounds : ↑j1 + 1 < (l :: acc.snd.fst).length
j2_succ_in_bounds : ↑j2 + 1 < (l :: acc.snd.fst).length
j1_succ : Fin (l :: acc.snd.fst).length := ⟨↑j1 + 1, j1_succ_in_bounds⟩
j2_succ : Fin (l :: acc.snd.fst).length := ⟨↑j2 + 1, j2_succ_in_bounds⟩
l_ne_i : l.fst.val ≠ ↑i
k : Fin acc.snd.fst.length.succ
k_ne_j1_succ : ¬k = j1_succ
k_ne_j2_succ : ¬k = j2_succ
⊢ ¬((l :: acc.snd.fst).get k).fst.val = ↑i
Tactic:
have zero_in_bounds : 0 < (l :: acc.2.1).length := by
  simp only [List.length_cons]
  exact Nat.zero_lt_succ (List.length acc.snd.fst)
Proof state after:
case inr.inr.intro.intro.intro.intro.intro.intro.intro.intro.right.right
n : Nat
f : DefaultFormula n
f_assignments_size : f.assignments.size = n
acc : Array Assignment × List (Literal (PosFin n)) × Bool × Bool
hsize : acc.fst.size = n
l : Literal (PosFin n)
ih : f.derivedLits_invariant f_assignments_size acc.fst hsize acc.snd.fst
h : ¬hasAssignment l.snd acc.fst[l.fst.val]! = true
hsize'✝ : (acc.fst.modify l.fst.val (addAssignment l.snd)).size = n :=
  Eq.mpr (id (congrArg (fun _a => _a = n) Array.modify_preserves_size)) hsize
i : Fin n
i_in_bounds : ↑i < acc.fst.size
l_in_bounds : l.fst.val < acc.fst.size
j1 j2 : Fin acc.snd.fst.length
j1_eq_i : (acc.snd.fst.get j1).fst.val = ↑i
j2_eq_i : (acc.snd.fst.get j2).fst.val = ↑i
j1_eq_true : (acc.snd.fst.get j1).snd = true
j2_eq_false : (acc.snd.fst.get j2).snd = false
h1 : acc.fst[↑i] = both
h2 : f.assignments[↑i] = unassigned
h3 : ∀ (k : Fin acc.snd.fst.length), k ≠ j1 → k ≠ j2 → (acc.snd.fst.get k).fst.val ≠ ↑i
j1_succ_in_bounds : ↑j1 + 1 < (l :: acc.snd.fst).length
j2_succ_in_bounds : ↑j2 + 1 < (l :: acc.snd.fst).length
j1_succ : Fin (l :: acc.snd.fst).length := ⟨↑j1 + 1, j1_succ_in_bounds⟩
j2_succ : Fin (l :: acc.snd.fst).length := ⟨↑j2 + 1, j2_succ_in_bounds⟩
l_ne_i : l.fst.val ≠ ↑i
k : Fin acc.snd.fst.length.succ
k_ne_j1_succ : ¬k = j1_succ
k_ne_j2_succ : ¬k = j2_succ
zero_in_bounds : 0 < (l :: acc.snd.fst).length
⊢ ¬((l :: acc.snd.fst).get k).fst.val = ↑i
Theorem: LRAT.DefaultFormula.confirmRupHint_preserves_invariant_helper
Proof state before:
case neg
n : Nat
f : DefaultFormula n
f_assignments_size : f.assignments.size = n
acc : Array Assignment × List (Literal (PosFin n)) × Bool × Bool
hsize : acc.fst.size = n
l : Literal (PosFin n)
ih : f.derivedLits_invariant f_assignments_size acc.fst hsize acc.snd.fst
h : ¬hasAssignment l.snd acc.fst[l.fst.val]! = true
hsize'✝ : (acc.fst.modify l.fst.val (addAssignment l.snd)).size = n :=
  Eq.mpr (id (congrArg (fun _a => _a = n) Array.modify_preserves_size)) hsize
i : Fin n
i_in_bounds : ↑i < acc.fst.size
l_in_bounds : l.fst.val < acc.fst.size
j1 j2 : Fin acc.snd.fst.length
j1_eq_i : (acc.snd.fst.get j1).fst.val = ↑i
j2_eq_i : (acc.snd.fst.get j2).fst.val = ↑i
j1_eq_true : (acc.snd.fst.get j1).snd = true
j2_eq_false : (acc.snd.fst.get j2).snd = false
h1 : acc.fst[↑i] = both
h2 : f.assignments[↑i] = unassigned
h3 : ∀ (k : Fin acc.snd.fst.length), k ≠ j1 → k ≠ j2 → (acc.snd.fst.get k).fst.val ≠ ↑i
j1_succ_in_bounds : ↑j1 + 1 < (l :: acc.snd.fst).length
j2_succ_in_bounds : ↑j2 + 1 < (l :: acc.snd.fst).length
j1_succ : Fin (l :: acc.snd.fst).length := ⟨↑j1 + 1, j1_succ_in_bounds⟩
j2_succ : Fin (l :: acc.snd.fst).length := ⟨↑j2 + 1, j2_succ_in_bounds⟩
l_ne_i : l.fst.val ≠ ↑i
k : Fin acc.snd.fst.length.succ
k_ne_j1_succ : ¬k = j1_succ
k_ne_j2_succ : ¬k = j2_succ
zero_in_bounds : 0 < (l :: acc.snd.fst).length
h✝ : ¬k = ⟨0, zero_in_bounds⟩
⊢ ¬((l :: acc.snd.fst).get k).fst.val = ↑i
Tactic:
. next k_ne_zero =>
  have k_eq_succ : ∃ k' : Nat, ∃ k'_succ_in_bounds : k' + 1 < (l :: acc.2.1).length, k = ⟨k' + 1, k'_succ_in_bounds⟩ := by
    have k_val_ne_zero : k.1 ≠ 0 := by
      intro k_eq_zero
      simp only [List.length_cons, ← k_eq_zero, ne_eq, not_true] at k_ne_zero
    rcases Nat.exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero k_val_ne_zero with ⟨k', k_eq_k'_succ⟩
    rw [Nat.succ_eq_add_one k'] at k_eq_k'_succ
    have k'_succ_in_bounds : k' + 1 < (l :: acc.2.1).length := by rw [← k_eq_k'_succ]; exact k.2
    apply Exists.intro k' ∘ Exists.intro k'_succ_in_bounds
    apply Fin.eq_of_val_eq
    exact k_eq_k'_succ
  rcases k_eq_succ with ⟨k', k'_succ_in_bounds, k_eq_succ⟩
  rw [k_eq_succ]
  simp only [List.get, Nat.add_eq, Nat.add_zero, ne_eq]
  have k'_in_bounds : k' < acc.2.1.length := by
    simp only [List.length_cons, Nat.succ_eq_add_one] at k'_succ_in_bounds
    exact Nat.lt_of_succ_lt_succ k'_succ_in_bounds
  have k'_ne_j1 : ⟨k', k'_in_bounds⟩ ≠ j1 := by
    simp only [List.length_cons, k_eq_succ, ne_eq, Fin.mk.injEq, Nat.succ.injEq, j1_succ] at k_ne_j1_succ
    exact Fin.ne_of_val_ne k_ne_j1_succ
  have k'_ne_j2 : ⟨k', k'_in_bounds⟩ ≠ j2 := by
    simp only [List.length_cons, k_eq_succ, ne_eq, Fin.mk.injEq, Nat.succ.injEq, j2_succ] at k_ne_j2_succ
    exact Fin.ne_of_val_ne k_ne_j2_succ
  exact h3 ⟨k', k'_in_bounds⟩ k'_ne_j1 k'_ne_j2
Proof state after:
no goals
Theorem: LRAT.DefaultFormula.confirmRupHint_preserves_invariant_helper
Proof state before:
n : Nat
f : DefaultFormula n
f_assignments_size : f.assignments.size = n
acc : Array Assignment × List (Literal (PosFin n)) × Bool × Bool
hsize : acc.fst.size = n
l : Literal (PosFin n)
ih : f.derivedLits_invariant f_assignments_size acc.fst hsize acc.snd.fst
h : ¬hasAssignment l.snd acc.fst[l.fst.val]! = true
hsize'✝ : (acc.fst.modify l.fst.val (addAssignment l.snd)).size = n :=
  Eq.mpr (id (congrArg (fun _a => _a = n) Array.modify_preserves_size)) hsize
i : Fin n
i_in_bounds : ↑i < acc.fst.size
l_in_bounds : l.fst.val < acc.fst.size
j1 j2 : Fin acc.snd.fst.length
j1_eq_i : (acc.snd.fst.get j1).fst.val = ↑i
j2_eq_i : (acc.snd.fst.get j2).fst.val = ↑i
j1_eq_true : (acc.snd.fst.get j1).snd = true
j2_eq_false : (acc.snd.fst.get j2).snd = false
h1 : acc.fst[↑i] = both
h2 : f.assignments[↑i] = unassigned
h3 : ∀ (k : Fin acc.snd.fst.length), k ≠ j1 → k ≠ j2 → (acc.snd.fst.get k).fst.val ≠ ↑i
j1_succ_in_bounds : ↑j1 + 1 < (l :: acc.snd.fst).length
j2_succ_in_bounds : ↑j2 + 1 < (l :: acc.snd.fst).length
j1_succ : Fin (l :: acc.snd.fst).length := ⟨↑j1 + 1, j1_succ_in_bounds⟩
j2_succ : Fin (l :: acc.snd.fst).length := ⟨↑j2 + 1, j2_succ_in_bounds⟩
l_ne_i : l.fst.val ≠ ↑i
k : Fin acc.snd.fst.length.succ
k_ne_j1_succ : ¬k = j1_succ
k_ne_j2_succ : ¬k = j2_succ
⊢ 0 < (l :: acc.snd.fst).length
Tactic:
simp only [List.length_cons]
Proof state after:
n : Nat
f : DefaultFormula n
f_assignments_size : f.assignments.size = n
acc : Array Assignment × List (Literal (PosFin n)) × Bool × Bool
hsize : acc.fst.size = n
l : Literal (PosFin n)
ih : f.derivedLits_invariant f_assignments_size acc.fst hsize acc.snd.fst
h : ¬hasAssignment l.snd acc.fst[l.fst.val]! = true
hsize'✝ : (acc.fst.modify l.fst.val (addAssignment l.snd)).size = n :=
  Eq.mpr (id (congrArg (fun _a => _a = n) Array.modify_preserves_size)) hsize
i : Fin n
i_in_bounds : ↑i < acc.fst.size
l_in_bounds : l.fst.val < acc.fst.size
j1 j2 : Fin acc.snd.fst.length
j1_eq_i : (acc.snd.fst.get j1).fst.val = ↑i
j2_eq_i : (acc.snd.fst.get j2).fst.val = ↑i
j1_eq_true : (acc.snd.fst.get j1).snd = true
j2_eq_false : (acc.snd.fst.get j2).snd = false
h1 : acc.fst[↑i] = both
h2 : f.assignments[↑i] = unassigned
h3 : ∀ (k : Fin acc.snd.fst.length), k ≠ j1 → k ≠ j2 → (acc.snd.fst.get k).fst.val ≠ ↑i
j1_succ_in_bounds : ↑j1 + 1 < (l :: acc.snd.fst).length
j2_succ_in_bounds : ↑j2 + 1 < (l :: acc.snd.fst).length
j1_succ : Fin (l :: acc.snd.fst).length := ⟨↑j1 + 1, j1_succ_in_bounds⟩
j2_succ : Fin (l :: acc.snd.fst).length := ⟨↑j2 + 1, j2_succ_in_bounds⟩
l_ne_i : l.fst.val ≠ ↑i
k : Fin acc.snd.fst.length.succ
k_ne_j1_succ : ¬k = j1_succ
k_ne_j2_succ : ¬k = j2_succ
⊢ 0 < acc.snd.fst.length.succ
Theorem: LRAT.DefaultFormula.confirmRupHint_preserves_invariant_helper
Proof state before:
n : Nat
f : DefaultFormula n
f_assignments_size : f.assignments.size = n
acc : Array Assignment × List (Literal (PosFin n)) × Bool × Bool
hsize : acc.fst.size = n
l : Literal (PosFin n)
ih : f.derivedLits_invariant f_assignments_size acc.fst hsize acc.snd.fst
h : ¬hasAssignment l.snd acc.fst[l.fst.val]! = true
hsize'✝ : (acc.fst.modify l.fst.val (addAssignment l.snd)).size = n :=
  Eq.mpr (id (congrArg (fun _a => _a = n) Array.modify_preserves_size)) hsize
i : Fin n
i_in_bounds : ↑i < acc.fst.size
l_in_bounds : l.fst.val < acc.fst.size
j1 j2 : Fin acc.snd.fst.length
j1_eq_i : (acc.snd.fst.get j1).fst.val = ↑i
j2_eq_i : (acc.snd.fst.get j2).fst.val = ↑i
j1_eq_true : (acc.snd.fst.get j1).snd = true
j2_eq_false : (acc.snd.fst.get j2).snd = false
h1 : acc.fst[↑i] = both
h2 : f.assignments[↑i] = unassigned
h3 : ∀ (k : Fin acc.snd.fst.length), k ≠ j1 → k ≠ j2 → (acc.snd.fst.get k).fst.val ≠ ↑i
j1_succ_in_bounds : ↑j1 + 1 < (l :: acc.snd.fst).length
j2_succ_in_bounds : ↑j2 + 1 < (l :: acc.snd.fst).length
j1_succ : Fin (l :: acc.snd.fst).length := ⟨↑j1 + 1, j1_succ_in_bounds⟩
j2_succ : Fin (l :: acc.snd.fst).length := ⟨↑j2 + 1, j2_succ_in_bounds⟩
l_ne_i : l.fst.val ≠ ↑i
k : Fin acc.snd.fst.length.succ
k_ne_j1_succ : ¬k = j1_succ
k_ne_j2_succ : ¬k = j2_succ
⊢ 0 < acc.snd.fst.length.succ
Tactic:
exact Nat.zero_lt_succ (List.length acc.snd.fst)
Proof state after:
no goals
Theorem: LRAT.DefaultFormula.confirmRupHint_preserves_invariant_helper
Proof state before:
case pos
n : Nat
f : DefaultFormula n
f_assignments_size : f.assignments.size = n
acc : Array Assignment × List (Literal (PosFin n)) × Bool × Bool
hsize : acc.fst.size = n
l : Literal (PosFin n)
ih : f.derivedLits_invariant f_assignments_size acc.fst hsize acc.snd.fst
h : ¬hasAssignment l.snd acc.fst[l.fst.val]! = true
hsize'✝ : (acc.fst.modify l.fst.val (addAssignment l.snd)).size = n :=
  Eq.mpr (id (congrArg (fun _a => _a = n) Array.modify_preserves_size)) hsize
i : Fin n
i_in_bounds : ↑i < acc.fst.size
l_in_bounds : l.fst.val < acc.fst.size
j1 j2 : Fin acc.snd.fst.length
j1_eq_i : (acc.snd.fst.get j1).fst.val = ↑i
j2_eq_i : (acc.snd.fst.get j2).fst.val = ↑i
j1_eq_true : (acc.snd.fst.get j1).snd = true
j2_eq_false : (acc.snd.fst.get j2).snd = false
h1 : acc.fst[↑i] = both
h2 : f.assignments[↑i] = unassigned
h3 : ∀ (k : Fin acc.snd.fst.length), k ≠ j1 → k ≠ j2 → (acc.snd.fst.get k).fst.val ≠ ↑i
j1_succ_in_bounds : ↑j1 + 1 < (l :: acc.snd.fst).length
j2_succ_in_bounds : ↑j2 + 1 < (l :: acc.snd.fst).length
j1_succ : Fin (l :: acc.snd.fst).length := ⟨↑j1 + 1, j1_succ_in_bounds⟩
j2_succ : Fin (l :: acc.snd.fst).length := ⟨↑j2 + 1, j2_succ_in_bounds⟩
l_ne_i : l.fst.val ≠ ↑i
k : Fin acc.snd.fst.length.succ
k_ne_j1_succ : ¬k = j1_succ
k_ne_j2_succ : ¬k = j2_succ
zero_in_bounds : 0 < (l :: acc.snd.fst).length
h✝ : k = ⟨0, zero_in_bounds⟩
⊢ ¬((l :: acc.snd.fst).get k).fst.val = ↑i
Tactic:
next k_eq_zero =>
simp only [k_eq_zero, List.length_cons, List.get, ne_eq]
exact l_ne_i
Proof state after:
no goals