internlm/Lean-Github huggingface dataset:
Theorem: Hilbert_kernel_regularity_main_part
Proof state before:
y y' : ℝ
yy'nonneg : 0 ≤ y ∧ 0 ≤ y'
ypos : 0 < y
y2ley' : y / 2 ≤ y'
hy : y ≤ 1
hy' : y' ≤ 1
f : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp)
f' : ℝ → ℂ :=
  fun t =>
    (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2
f'def :
  f' = fun t =>
    (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2
c : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => 1 - ↑t
cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t
c' : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => -1
c'def : c' = fun t => -1
d : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
d' : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
t : ℝ
ht : y' ≤ t ∧ t ≤ y ∨ y ≤ t ∧ t ≤ y'
ht' : 0 < t ∧ t ≤ 1
⊢ (fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) t ≠ 0
Tactic:
simp
Proof state after:
y y' : ℝ
yy'nonneg : 0 ≤ y ∧ 0 ≤ y'
ypos : 0 < y
y2ley' : y / 2 ≤ y'
hy : y ≤ 1
hy' : y' ≤ 1
f : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp)
f' : ℝ → ℂ :=
  fun t =>
    (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2
f'def :
  f' = fun t =>
    (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2
c : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => 1 - ↑t
cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t
c' : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => -1
c'def : c' = fun t => -1
d : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
d' : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
t : ℝ
ht : y' ≤ t ∧ t ≤ y ∨ y ≤ t ∧ t ≤ y'
ht' : 0 < t ∧ t ≤ 1
⊢ ¬1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp = 0
Theorem: Hilbert_kernel_regularity_main_part
Proof state before:
y y' : ℝ
yy'nonneg : 0 ≤ y ∧ 0 ≤ y'
ypos : 0 < y
y2ley' : y / 2 ≤ y'
hy : y ≤ 1
hy' : y' ≤ 1
f : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp)
f' : ℝ → ℂ :=
  fun t =>
    (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2
f'def :
  f' = fun t =>
    (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2
c : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => 1 - ↑t
cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t
c' : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => -1
c'def : c' = fun t => -1
d : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
d' : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
t : ℝ
ht : y' ≤ t ∧ t ≤ y ∨ y ≤ t ∧ t ≤ y'
ht' : 0 < t ∧ t ≤ 1
⊢ ¬1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp = 0
Tactic:
rw [←norm_eq_zero]
Proof state after:
y y' : ℝ
yy'nonneg : 0 ≤ y ∧ 0 ≤ y'
ypos : 0 < y
y2ley' : y / 2 ≤ y'
hy : y ≤ 1
hy' : y' ≤ 1
f : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp)
f' : ℝ → ℂ :=
  fun t =>
    (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2
f'def :
  f' = fun t =>
    (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2
c : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => 1 - ↑t
cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t
c' : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => -1
c'def : c' = fun t => -1
d : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
d' : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
t : ℝ
ht : y' ≤ t ∧ t ≤ y ∨ y ≤ t ∧ t ≤ y'
ht' : 0 < t ∧ t ≤ 1
⊢ ¬‖1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp‖ = 0
Theorem: Hilbert_kernel_regularity_main_part
Proof state before:
y y' : ℝ
yy'nonneg : 0 ≤ y ∧ 0 ≤ y'
ypos : 0 < y
y2ley' : y / 2 ≤ y'
hy : y ≤ 1
hy' : y' ≤ 1
f : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp)
f' : ℝ → ℂ :=
  fun t =>
    (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2
f'def :
  f' = fun t =>
    (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2
c : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => 1 - ↑t
cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t
c' : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => -1
c'def : c' = fun t => -1
d : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
d' : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
t : ℝ
ht : y' ≤ t ∧ t ≤ y ∨ y ≤ t ∧ t ≤ y'
ht' : 0 < t ∧ t ≤ 1
⊢ ¬‖1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp‖ = 0
Tactic:
apply ne_of_gt
Proof state after:
case h
y y' : ℝ
yy'nonneg : 0 ≤ y ∧ 0 ≤ y'
ypos : 0 < y
y2ley' : y / 2 ≤ y'
hy : y ≤ 1
hy' : y' ≤ 1
f : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp)
f' : ℝ → ℂ :=
  fun t =>
    (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2
f'def :
  f' = fun t =>
    (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2
c : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => 1 - ↑t
cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t
c' : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => -1
c'def : c' = fun t => -1
d : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
d' : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
t : ℝ
ht : y' ≤ t ∧ t ≤ y ∨ y ≤ t ∧ t ≤ y'
ht' : 0 < t ∧ t ≤ 1
⊢ 0 < ‖1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp‖
Theorem: Hilbert_kernel_regularity_main_part
Proof state before:
case h
y y' : ℝ
yy'nonneg : 0 ≤ y ∧ 0 ≤ y'
ypos : 0 < y
y2ley' : y / 2 ≤ y'
hy : y ≤ 1
hy' : y' ≤ 1
f : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp)
f' : ℝ → ℂ :=
  fun t =>
    (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2
f'def :
  f' = fun t =>
    (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2
c : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => 1 - ↑t
cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t
c' : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => -1
c'def : c' = fun t => -1
d : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
d' : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
t : ℝ
ht : y' ≤ t ∧ t ≤ y ∨ y ≤ t ∧ t ≤ y'
ht' : 0 < t ∧ t ≤ 1
⊢ 0 < ‖1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp‖
Tactic:
calc ‖1 - Complex.exp (-(Complex.I * ↑t))‖
  _ ≥ |(1 - Complex.exp (-(Complex.I * ↑t))).im| := by
    simp only [Complex.norm_eq_abs, ge_iff_le]
    apply Complex.abs_im_le_abs
  _ = Real.sin t := by
    simp
    rw [Complex.exp_im]
    simp
    apply Real.sin_nonneg_of_nonneg_of_le_pi
    . linarith
    . linarith [Real.two_le_pi]
  _ > 0 := by
    apply Real.sin_pos_of_pos_of_lt_pi
    . linarith
    . linarith [Real.two_le_pi]
Proof state after:
no goals
Theorem: Hilbert_kernel_regularity_main_part
Proof state before:
y y' : ℝ
yy'nonneg : 0 ≤ y ∧ 0 ≤ y'
ypos : 0 < y
y2ley' : y / 2 ≤ y'
hy : y ≤ 1
hy' : y' ≤ 1
f : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp)
f' : ℝ → ℂ :=
  fun t =>
    (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2
f'def :
  f' = fun t =>
    (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2
c : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => 1 - ↑t
cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t
c' : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => -1
c'def : c' = fun t => -1
d : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
d' : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
t : ℝ
ht : y' ≤ t ∧ t ≤ y ∨ y ≤ t ∧ t ≤ y'
⊢ 0 < t ∧ t ≤ 1
Tactic:
rcases ht with ht | ht <;> (constructor <;> linarith)
Proof state after:
no goals
Theorem: Hilbert_kernel_regularity_main_part
Proof state before:
case inr
y y' : ℝ
yy'nonneg : 0 ≤ y ∧ 0 ≤ y'
ypos : 0 < y
y2ley' : y / 2 ≤ y'
hy : y ≤ 1
hy' : y' ≤ 1
f : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp)
f' : ℝ → ℂ :=
  fun t =>
    (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2
f'def :
  f' = fun t =>
    (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2
c : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => 1 - ↑t
cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t
c' : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => -1
c'def : c' = fun t => -1
d : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
d' : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
t : ℝ
ht : y ≤ t ∧ t ≤ y'
⊢ 0 < t ∧ t ≤ 1
Tactic:
constructor <;> linarith
Proof state after:
no goals
Theorem: Hilbert_kernel_regularity_main_part
Proof state before:
y y' : ℝ
yy'nonneg : 0 ≤ y ∧ 0 ≤ y'
ypos : 0 < y
y2ley' : y / 2 ≤ y'
hy : y ≤ 1
hy' : y' ≤ 1
f : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp)
f' : ℝ → ℂ :=
  fun t =>
    (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2
f'def :
  f' = fun t =>
    (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2
c : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => 1 - ↑t
cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t
c' : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => -1
c'def : c' = fun t => -1
d : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
d' : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
t : ℝ
ht : y' ≤ t ∧ t ≤ y ∨ y ≤ t ∧ t ≤ y'
ht' : 0 < t ∧ t ≤ 1
⊢ ‖1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp‖ ≥ |(1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp).im|
Tactic:
simp only [Complex.norm_eq_abs, ge_iff_le]
Proof state after:
y y' : ℝ
yy'nonneg : 0 ≤ y ∧ 0 ≤ y'
ypos : 0 < y
y2ley' : y / 2 ≤ y'
hy : y ≤ 1
hy' : y' ≤ 1
f : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp)
f' : ℝ → ℂ :=
  fun t =>
    (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2
f'def :
  f' = fun t =>
    (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2
c : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => 1 - ↑t
cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t
c' : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => -1
c'def : c' = fun t => -1
d : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
d' : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
t : ℝ
ht : y' ≤ t ∧ t ≤ y ∨ y ≤ t ∧ t ≤ y'
ht' : 0 < t ∧ t ≤ 1
⊢ |(1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp).im| ≤ Complex.abs (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp)
Theorem: Hilbert_kernel_regularity_main_part
Proof state before:
y y' : ℝ
yy'nonneg : 0 ≤ y ∧ 0 ≤ y'
ypos : 0 < y
y2ley' : y / 2 ≤ y'
hy : y ≤ 1
hy' : y' ≤ 1
f : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp)
f' : ℝ → ℂ :=
  fun t =>
    (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2
f'def :
  f' = fun t =>
    (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2
c : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => 1 - ↑t
cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t
c' : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => -1
c'def : c' = fun t => -1
d : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
d' : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
t : ℝ
ht : y' ≤ t ∧ t ≤ y ∨ y ≤ t ∧ t ≤ y'
ht' : 0 < t ∧ t ≤ 1
⊢ |(1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp).im| ≤ Complex.abs (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp)
Tactic:
apply Complex.abs_im_le_abs
Proof state after:
no goals
Theorem: Hilbert_kernel_regularity_main_part
Proof state before:
y y' : ℝ
yy'nonneg : 0 ≤ y ∧ 0 ≤ y'
ypos : 0 < y
y2ley' : y / 2 ≤ y'
hy : y ≤ 1
hy' : y' ≤ 1
f : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp)
f' : ℝ → ℂ :=
  fun t =>
    (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2
f'def :
  f' = fun t =>
    (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2
c : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => 1 - ↑t
cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t
c' : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => -1
c'def : c' = fun t => -1
d : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
d' : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
t : ℝ
ht : y' ≤ t ∧ t ≤ y ∨ y ≤ t ∧ t ≤ y'
ht' : 0 < t ∧ t ≤ 1
⊢ |(1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp).im| = t.sin
Tactic:
simp
Proof state after:
y y' : ℝ
yy'nonneg : 0 ≤ y ∧ 0 ≤ y'
ypos : 0 < y
y2ley' : y / 2 ≤ y'
hy : y ≤ 1
hy' : y' ≤ 1
f : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp)
f' : ℝ → ℂ :=
  fun t =>
    (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2
f'def :
  f' = fun t =>
    (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2
c : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => 1 - ↑t
cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t
c' : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => -1
c'def : c' = fun t => -1
d : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
d' : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
t : ℝ
ht : y' ≤ t ∧ t ≤ y ∨ y ≤ t ∧ t ≤ y'
ht' : 0 < t ∧ t ≤ 1
⊢ |(-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp.im| = t.sin
Theorem: Hilbert_kernel_regularity_main_part
Proof state before:
y y' : ℝ
yy'nonneg : 0 ≤ y ∧ 0 ≤ y'
ypos : 0 < y
y2ley' : y / 2 ≤ y'
hy : y ≤ 1
hy' : y' ≤ 1
f : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp)
f' : ℝ → ℂ :=
  fun t =>
    (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2
f'def :
  f' = fun t =>
    (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2
c : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => 1 - ↑t
cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t
c' : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => -1
c'def : c' = fun t => -1
d : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
d' : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
t : ℝ
ht : y' ≤ t ∧ t ≤ y ∨ y ≤ t ∧ t ≤ y'
ht' : 0 < t ∧ t ≤ 1
⊢ |(-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp.im| = t.sin
Tactic:
rw [Complex.exp_im]
Proof state after:
y y' : ℝ
yy'nonneg : 0 ≤ y ∧ 0 ≤ y'
ypos : 0 < y
y2ley' : y / 2 ≤ y'
hy : y ≤ 1
hy' : y' ≤ 1
f : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp)
f' : ℝ → ℂ :=
  fun t =>
    (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2
f'def :
  f' = fun t =>
    (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2
c : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => 1 - ↑t
cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t
c' : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => -1
c'def : c' = fun t => -1
d : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
d' : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
t : ℝ
ht : y' ≤ t ∧ t ≤ y ∨ y ≤ t ∧ t ≤ y'
ht' : 0 < t ∧ t ≤ 1
⊢ |(-(Complex.I * ↑t)).re.exp * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).im.sin| = t.sin
Theorem: Hilbert_kernel_regularity_main_part
Proof state before:
y y' : ℝ
yy'nonneg : 0 ≤ y ∧ 0 ≤ y'
ypos : 0 < y
y2ley' : y / 2 ≤ y'
hy : y ≤ 1
hy' : y' ≤ 1
f : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp)
f' : ℝ → ℂ :=
  fun t =>
    (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2
f'def :
  f' = fun t =>
    (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2
c : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => 1 - ↑t
cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t
c' : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => -1
c'def : c' = fun t => -1
d : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
d' : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
t : ℝ
ht : y' ≤ t ∧ t ≤ y ∨ y ≤ t ∧ t ≤ y'
ht' : 0 < t ∧ t ≤ 1
⊢ |(-(Complex.I * ↑t)).re.exp * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).im.sin| = t.sin
Tactic:
simp
Proof state after:
y y' : ℝ
yy'nonneg : 0 ≤ y ∧ 0 ≤ y'
ypos : 0 < y
y2ley' : y / 2 ≤ y'
hy : y ≤ 1
hy' : y' ≤ 1
f : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp)
f' : ℝ → ℂ :=
  fun t =>
    (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2
f'def :
  f' = fun t =>
    (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2
c : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => 1 - ↑t
cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t
c' : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => -1
c'def : c' = fun t => -1
d : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
d' : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
t : ℝ
ht : y' ≤ t ∧ t ≤ y ∨ y ≤ t ∧ t ≤ y'
ht' : 0 < t ∧ t ≤ 1
⊢ 0 ≤ t.sin
Theorem: Hilbert_kernel_regularity_main_part
Proof state before:
y y' : ℝ
yy'nonneg : 0 ≤ y ∧ 0 ≤ y'
ypos : 0 < y
y2ley' : y / 2 ≤ y'
hy : y ≤ 1
hy' : y' ≤ 1
f : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp)
f' : ℝ → ℂ :=
  fun t =>
    (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2
f'def :
  f' = fun t =>
    (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2
c : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => 1 - ↑t
cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t
c' : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => -1
c'def : c' = fun t => -1
d : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
d' : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
t : ℝ
ht : y' ≤ t ∧ t ≤ y ∨ y ≤ t ∧ t ≤ y'
ht' : 0 < t ∧ t ≤ 1
⊢ 0 ≤ t.sin
Tactic:
apply Real.sin_nonneg_of_nonneg_of_le_pi
Proof state after:
case h0x
y y' : ℝ
yy'nonneg : 0 ≤ y ∧ 0 ≤ y'
ypos : 0 < y
y2ley' : y / 2 ≤ y'
hy : y ≤ 1
hy' : y' ≤ 1
f : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp)
f' : ℝ → ℂ :=
  fun t =>
    (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2
f'def :
  f' = fun t =>
    (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2
c : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => 1 - ↑t
cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t
c' : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => -1
c'def : c' = fun t => -1
d : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
d' : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
t : ℝ
ht : y' ≤ t ∧ t ≤ y ∨ y ≤ t ∧ t ≤ y'
ht' : 0 < t ∧ t ≤ 1
⊢ 0 ≤ t

case hxp
y y' : ℝ
yy'nonneg : 0 ≤ y ∧ 0 ≤ y'
ypos : 0 < y
y2ley' : y / 2 ≤ y'
hy : y ≤ 1
hy' : y' ≤ 1
f : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp)
f' : ℝ → ℂ :=
  fun t =>
    (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2
f'def :
  f' = fun t =>
    (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2
c : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => 1 - ↑t
cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t
c' : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => -1
c'def : c' = fun t => -1
d : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
d' : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
t : ℝ
ht : y' ≤ t ∧ t ≤ y ∨ y ≤ t ∧ t ≤ y'
ht' : 0 < t ∧ t ≤ 1
⊢ t ≤ Real.pi
Theorem: Hilbert_kernel_regularity_main_part
Proof state before:
case h0x
y y' : ℝ
yy'nonneg : 0 ≤ y ∧ 0 ≤ y'
ypos : 0 < y
y2ley' : y / 2 ≤ y'
hy : y ≤ 1
hy' : y' ≤ 1
f : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp)
f' : ℝ → ℂ :=
  fun t =>
    (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2
f'def :
  f' = fun t =>
    (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2
c : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => 1 - ↑t
cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t
c' : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => -1
c'def : c' = fun t => -1
d : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
d' : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
t : ℝ
ht : y' ≤ t ∧ t ≤ y ∨ y ≤ t ∧ t ≤ y'
ht' : 0 < t ∧ t ≤ 1
⊢ 0 ≤ t

case hxp
y y' : ℝ
yy'nonneg : 0 ≤ y ∧ 0 ≤ y'
ypos : 0 < y
y2ley' : y / 2 ≤ y'
hy : y ≤ 1
hy' : y' ≤ 1
f : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp)
f' : ℝ → ℂ :=
  fun t =>
    (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2
f'def :
  f' = fun t =>
    (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2
c : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => 1 - ↑t
cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t
c' : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => -1
c'def : c' = fun t => -1
d : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
d' : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
t : ℝ
ht : y' ≤ t ∧ t ≤ y ∨ y ≤ t ∧ t ≤ y'
ht' : 0 < t ∧ t ≤ 1
⊢ t ≤ Real.pi
Tactic:
. linarith
Proof state after:
case hxp
y y' : ℝ
yy'nonneg : 0 ≤ y ∧ 0 ≤ y'
ypos : 0 < y
y2ley' : y / 2 ≤ y'
hy : y ≤ 1
hy' : y' ≤ 1
f : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp)
f' : ℝ → ℂ :=
  fun t =>
    (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2
f'def :
  f' = fun t =>
    (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2
c : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => 1 - ↑t
cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t
c' : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => -1
c'def : c' = fun t => -1
d : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
d' : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
t : ℝ
ht : y' ≤ t ∧ t ≤ y ∨ y ≤ t ∧ t ≤ y'
ht' : 0 < t ∧ t ≤ 1
⊢ t ≤ Real.pi
Theorem: Hilbert_kernel_regularity_main_part
Proof state before:
case hxp
y y' : ℝ
yy'nonneg : 0 ≤ y ∧ 0 ≤ y'
ypos : 0 < y
y2ley' : y / 2 ≤ y'
hy : y ≤ 1
hy' : y' ≤ 1
f : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp)
f' : ℝ → ℂ :=
  fun t =>
    (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2
f'def :
  f' = fun t =>
    (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2
c : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => 1 - ↑t
cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t
c' : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => -1
c'def : c' = fun t => -1
d : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
d' : ℝ → ℂ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
t : ℝ
ht : y' ≤ t ∧ t ≤ y ∨ y ≤ t ∧ t ≤ y'
ht' : 0 < t ∧ t ≤ 1
⊢ t ≤ Real.pi
Tactic:
. linarith [Real.two_le_pi]
Proof state after:
no goals