Interviewer(s): Kevin M. Rusnak
Interviewee(s): S. Jean Alexander

Kevin M. Rusnak: We were talking about what you do on the day of the mission, in terms of fitting the astronauts into their suits, walking them out to the pads, up to the white room. What specifically goes on in there?

S. Jean Alexander: About six or seven hours before launch, the lead suit tech and what we call the ASP, an Astronaut Support Person—one of the astronauts that is assigned for that mission—go out to the pad with the rest of the close-out crew. There's four technicians and a NASA QC (Quality Controller) that make up the team when we go out to the pad early, after tanking. We go ahead and prepare the vehicle, get it ready for the crew to arrive. The ASP goes in, does a lot of switch verifications, making sure everything's set up. The suit tech goes in; we make sure that headrests are installed, parachutes are in the right seats, the thermoelectric cooling units, the little liquid cooling units, are securely mounted. Just anything that's associated with the suit, double-check and make sure everything's okay. The rest of the close-out crew, they're doing a water drain. We install the Lithium Hydroxide canisters right before the crew comes out.\n\n Back in the suit room, in the Operations and Checking Building, a set of Boeing suit technicians are back there. They actually suit up the crew, put them in their suits, do a little man-testing right before they leave to make sure that the suit's not leaking. There's a Lockheed suit tech that's part of the close-out crew. He rides out to the pad in the Astrovan with the crew and brings them up the elevator. The lead suit tech does the ingress for the flight deck and Lockheed, the number-seven guy, does the strap-in on the middeck for the three crewmen down there.

Kevin M. Rusnak: So the group of technicians works with all the astronauts as opposed to having one specific technician for each?

S. Jean Alexander: Right.

Kevin M. Rusnak: How do your assignments work?

S. Jean Alexander: Until just recently there were three NASA suit technicians, and we had three or four contractor suit technicians. Every third flight a NASA suit technician was considered the lead. Then we had a Lockheed tech, and they rotated, too, so we would have a different one each time. We would be a team from this side of the group. Then Boeing would assign, depending on the size of the crew, anywhere from four to five technicians to work with that crew. Those technicians would try to work with the same crewman each time. Of course, sometimes that worked out and sometimes it didn't, so they'd see familiar faces at all the training exercises and know who to go to with questions. That's basically how it's always worked in the past.\n\n We're in the middle of a transition right now. They're turning all the suit tech jobs over to USA (United Space Alliance), because the Shuttle Program is going to be run by the contractors. Two of our NASA suit techs retired in December, so now we're bringing the Lockheed people up to be lead suit techs in charge of the overall mission.

Kevin M. Rusnak: Al Rochford and Troy Stewart retired?

S. Jean Alexander: Rochford and Stewart, yes.

Kevin M. Rusnak: How long have you been with NASA?

S. Jean Alexander: I've been with NASA since 1965. I've been in this area working with crew escape since 1980.

Kevin M. Rusnak: The first four missions, where the crews actually wore pressure suits, did you participate in that?

S. Jean Alexander: Yes, I was lucky; I came on just at the right time. I got to support the STS-1 landing at Edwards Air Force Base with Al Rochford. That's been the most exciting thing that I have done. I love what I do, doing the strap-ins and stuff, but the STS-1 landing was the most exciting thing that I've ever been in. Al Rochford was the lead for the land portion of that. Joe Schmitt was the lead for the strap-in portion. He strapped in Bob Crippen and John Young. Al and I were out at Edwards to recover them when they landed.

Kevin M. Rusnak: You mentioned that you participated in the landing. What goes on there?

S. Jean Alexander: Right now, the way we have it set up, there's a crew transfer vehicle called the CTV, that actually pulls up to the orbiter and makes a little walkway over to the orbiter hatch area. We open the hatch, the crew comes out, they walk across this walkway and they're right inside this big room. It's a mobile platform. It's like a big trailer house on high that can be jacked up.\n\n They come inside the CTV and then they take the suits off and get their land legs back and the doctors check them out. If there's any medical experiments that have to be done after landing, there's gurneys. They do blood draws, whatever they require for that specific mission.

Kevin M. Rusnak: Once the mission's completed, what do you do with the suits? Do you break them down, analyze them?

S. Jean Alexander: When they just wore coveralls, the light blue coveralls, they would come out in their coveralls and just walk around. We had to recover the harnesses and the helmets. They would just leave them on board the orbiter, usually, and we had to go in and recover that type of stuff.\n\n Once we went to the launch and entry suits, before we had liquid cooling, they would be so hot at landing that they would actually doff the suits right inside the orbiter and just leave it in the floor. We would have to go in and get all that gear, bundle it up, and get it out.\n\n Now that we have liquid cooling and the CTV, they are a little more comfortable at landing. It still gets hot after wheel stop, and the heat starts to build up some in the suit. But most of the time, they come out suited and onto the CTV, and then they doff the suits there. We bag all of that equipment up, try to recover everything that we can that's covered on our crew-worn drawing, and take it back to the suit room. Of course, everything's cleaned. We put stericide inside the suits to kill germs, clean everything up, then bag it and ship it back to Houston. Then it's tested again post-landing and turned around and put back into the system to be used again.\n\n There's only forty pressure suits, and all crews use them and train in them and fly in them. There's not a suit for each crewman like there used to be back in Mercury, Gemini, and Apollo when everybody had their own suit. That's not the way it is anymore.

Kevin M. Rusnak: The pad technicians were somewhat famous for their jokes with the astronauts. Does the same thing go on between the suit techs and the astronauts?

S. Jean Alexander: Yes. We have a real good working relationship with them. When you're suiting up, it's a friendly atmosphere. At launch time, things start getting a little more tense sometimes, so you try to do some things.\n\n STS-1—John Young, I believe, made a big deal about the size of the American flag on his suit. It came with a small version, and they got several sizes before he was satisfied with how big it was. They had to change it out two or three times, if I remember right, and it was kind of a joke. Launch morning there was a real estate office right next door to the motel that we stayed out in Cocoa Beach, and they had this huge flag that flew on a pole. One of the suit techs talked the real estate people into letting him take that flag down. He took it to the suit room for suit-up morning and covered one whole wall. When John Young walked in, he said, "John, is that flag big enough?" It just lightened things up.\n\n With STS-2, it was Joe Engle and Dick Truly. Both of them wore glasses. Back then the glasses had to mount into the helmet, they were attached to the helmet. It seemed like they changed glasses a lot during that time. Every time we turned around, we were having to get new glasses or redo something.\n\n So launch morning for one that one, I was at the Cape for that launch. Al Rochford was down there. He put on a trench coat, and he had like fifty pair of glasses on each side. When they came in, he opened it up, he said, "This is your last chance," you know, to try for glasses—big funny sunglasses, every type.\n\n We do different things. Like the last flight, STS-91, they carried a canister of roaches for some type of experiment that they had. One of the techs brought in an ad from home that was from an exterminator company that had a big roach on it. We made a bunch of copies of these roaches. When we were down at the Cape, we put them in their dresser drawer. They each have their own room where they live while they're at the Cape in the crew quarters there. So we taped them to the wall in the bathroom, to the light fixtures, on their pillows, so that every time they opened a drawer or something, there was a little paper roach somewhere. They would stick them on their door outside their room, keeping count of how many roach kills they had, I guess.

Kevin M. Rusnak: That certainly would lighten up the tension, I think, before a mission. How long before the mission would you go down to the Cape? Just the day of?

S. Jean Alexander: No, we traveled down anywhere from five to six days, depending if there's a weekend in there. Of course, they try not to work any more weekends than they have to because of overtime, but it depends on when the launch falls and the flow. We have to go down several days early, first of all, to receive all the gear. If you've got a seven-man crew, it's just a lot of equipment. It's tested here in Houston and then as soon as we get it there we test it all again, just to make sure nothing was damaged during shipment.\n\n Then we also do end-to-end com checks with all of the com gear, the lines that go into the orbiter with the helmets. All the O2 hoses, the oxygen hoses and stuff, we test all of those once we get to the Cape. We do a checkout of all the parachutes before they're installed on the seats. We charge the liquid cooling units or do a pre-flight testing on them once we're at the Cape. That takes several days to get all of that.\n\n The crew usually arrives anywhere from three to four days before the launch at the Cape. We have meetings and briefings with them. Then at L minus 2 they come in, and they do a fit check. They put on all of their gear, everything they're going to wear, and we do a man-testing with it to make sure everything's okay. They get to actually see their flight gear. Some of the flight gear that they actually fly with, they don't really see that much of in training, because they're just too expensive to provide for everyday training. They can't take the wear and tear.\n\n There's a thing called a personal digital assist. It's like a small laptop computer that they use. There's one that they can use in Building 5, but for the rest of the training it's not here. That's down there then. So it's the first time they really get to see a lot of that gear.\n\n The survival equipment in their packs, for their training, is dummy equipment, just for bulk. When they get down there they actually can pull the live flares out and see them and look at them again and review one more time. That's what the fit check is for.\n\n Suit-up morning they come in and they have about forty, forty-five minutes to do the suit-up. Then they head out to the pad.

Kevin M. Rusnak: Do you use a whole separate suit for training, or do you have them use the actual ones that they might use for the launch?

S. Jean Alexander: We try to have them use the actual one that they're going to use for launch. It just depends. If you have two crews back to back that have big guys on them, there's only so many extra large suits, so you may have to have the second crew that's not prime, one of those guys may have to fall back to the next smaller size for some of his training and then actually wait until that suit lands before it can be assigned to him. It happens most of the time for every training exercise. They always fly the size that they need. That's what we actually do at the Cape. We can take the cover layers off and do adjustments right down there, if we need to.

Kevin M. Rusnak: How does that work out for durability purposes, and how long will the suit last?

S. Jean Alexander: It's really amazing, with what they go through. We've just recently, in the last couple of years, changed from what we call the launch and entry suit, the LES, to the ACES, the Advanced Crew Escape Suit. One is a partial-pressure suit, and one is a full-pressure suit. The LES is the partial pressure suit. Considering the number of timse they've been worn and the number of bodies that have been in and out, and strenuous training, they have to climb up the top of the orbiter, go out the side of the orbiter, crawl in, and out. They've taken quite a beating, and they've held up really, really, really well, considering. It takes a lot of maintenance. Boeing has about fifteen to twenty suit techs on board at any time, just to process and to maintain the equipment.

Kevin M. Rusnak: Are you responsible for any maintenance here?

S. Jean Alexander: We do take care of the liquid-cooling garments. We check them, make repairs to them, and purge the air bubbles in the liquid-cooling units. Right now we have a two-man liquid-cooling unit that we fly. Two people share one cooling unit. The next version of that is an individual cooling unit, the ICU. That has not flown yet, but we've been testing it and doing some evaluations of it. It will be flying shortly.

Kevin M. Rusnak: What's your role in development? You mentioned a couple of these changes that they're going through.

S. Jean Alexander: We do a lot of things. The crew wanted a different knee board several years ago. They had metal knee boards, and they wanted one that would do a few more things. Their T-38 knee board had a clamp on it. We designed what we call a fabric knee board for them to use. We make a prototype, and we go over there with them, and they try it in training and make suggestions. Then we finalize things.\n\n When they have a problem with the suit, like their shoulders hurt, we developed a type of shoulder pad to put inside the cooling garment for them to use. When we started flying the parachutes after a couple of flights, we realized we didn't want the risers just floating around on orbit, because if it gets a hold of the D-ring and it gets pulled, you could have a problem. So we made a cover for the parachute that flies. We do things like that.\n\n The crew had a lot of problems on entry, the commander and pilot especially, with the helmet riding on the back of their head during entry, because the shuttle comes in at such an angle. With the vibration they were constantly feeling like they wanted to push the helmet back to get it off. Of course, any head movement at that time is critical, because it sets them to spinning. So you don't want to move it around any more than they have to. We developed a neck ring pad to put underneath the neck ring to support the helmet, to keep them from having to do that. That was a spinoff from—we heard one of the crewmen say that for entry he takes his helmet pads out of his helmet and puts them under his neck ring. We're like, "Okay." So we made a piece of equipment to do that for him so he didn't have to do that.\n\n The laptop computer on their knee board, we worked with one of the astronauts. Rick Mastracchio was in charge of that project. We had to develop a metal knee board for that thing to mount to and then strap to the leg to do that. We worked with them on that. We have access to machine shops, so it's easier for NASA to do that type of stuff, the development, anyway, than it probably is for the contractors to do.

Kevin M. Rusnak: So there's obviously a high degree of astronaut input. Do they assign anyone to work specifically with development of the suits?

S. Jean Alexander: Yes, there's always someone assigned as the crew escape representative from the astronaut office. Right now it's K. C. Chawla. It rotates. They're here for six months to a year, and then a different person will take over and work it. Any issues that come up during the time that they're there, that's who we call if we have a problem or want to do something.\n\n When we were down at the Cape, one of the crewmen wanted to wear their class patch on their shoulder. Well, that had to be approved. So we called the crew rep and say, "Is it okay?" They give their blessings, or if it takes a higher authority, then they take it up the chain for us, so that we don't have to do it. So they do that type of stuff.

Kevin M. Rusnak: So you said you've been working here since 1980, correct?

S. Jean Alexander: Yes.

Kevin M. Rusnak: That's really a long time at this job. How do you think the role of the suit technician has changed?

S. Jean Alexander: Well, it's been pretty consistent. That's one of the things that's been so valuable, I think, in the program, because we have the history. Fortunately, the three of us that were here, four counting Joe Schmitt, this is what we wanted to do for a career. We stayed with it. We didn't come here and work for three or four years and then go off and do something else. That's been really valuable, because you get new classes of astronauts all the time. It's kind of funny. We always laugh when you get a new crew and you go over and you do training with them, they're wanting to reinvent everything. "Why can't we do this? Why can't we do that?" And since you have that history, you can explain to them why. "Why do we have to do this like this?" So you can tell them why.\n\n In the contractor world, they have a high turnover of suit techs. If they stay three or four years at Boeing, that's a pretty long time for their turnover rate over there. Engineers, too. You lose a lot of that history when they leave. You're constantly in training. Whereas we selected our support contractors, our Lockheed people, we were looking for people that were young and that were looking for a career, because we had hoped that they would be the ones that would replace us. We knew that eventually the NASA techs would start retiring, because we're reaching that age.\n\n At that point we were told that we would be replaced with a NASA person, but then the program made the decision to turn the Shuttle Program over to the contractor. So now we're just training the contractors to take over and do our jobs.

Kevin M. Rusnak: So eventually there won't be any NASA suit techs?

S. Jean Alexander: Right now I am the last NASA suit tech that NASA has. I was told, with the ceiling and the no-hiring policy, it will just depend. I would think that the division would probably always want to have at least one suit tech because we can do things easier than contractors like advanced development. So I hope that when I retire, that they will have the space available that they can replace me with another NASA person.

Kevin M. Rusnak: You would think for the purposes of retention of knowledge. You mentioned the high turnover rate in contractors and such, and simply for continuation of NASA's role in this particular fashion. That would be unfortunate.

S. Jean Alexander: In our group right now subsystems managers are working on the portable breathing apparatus that's used on Space Station, so they need technicians. We'll be keeping at least one contractor technician and then maybe a contractor engineer to work projects like that, too.

Kevin M. Rusnak: Is there anything else about the job of the suit tech that you think is important, that we haven't covered?

S. Jean Alexander: The way that the system works right now, and I hope that it will carry over when the contractor takes over, is that the two people from our side of the team that make up the suit tech team, we act as checks and balances for the others. When they show up at the exercise with the equipment, we go in and double-check everything, make sure the suit is prepped right, has the counterbalance springs on and off, whatever the configuration for that crewman is, that it is the right size, that the right harness is there, that it's configured properly.\n\n That's an important operation, I think. That's one of the most important operations that we have in our setup, I think, the checks and balances. The Boeing contractors prep all the gear here and send it to the Cape. Then when we get to the Cape, we do a lot of the check-out and overseeing of the testing there. It's amazing, the little things that we catch, you know, just a second pair of eyes.\n\n It's good to have a QC in the room with you. Unless you've actually worked with the hardware yourself, you see it and work with it daily, there's a lot of things that get by you that you really don't see. So a second pair of eyes, I think, that's just the most important thing that we do.\n\n Then like I say, our history with doing the job. The ASP that goes out to the pad with us on each flight, they change. They do one or two flights, and then they're gone. A whole new group comes in and trains again. So they depend upon us to say, "Now what do we do this morning?" Launch morning, we have a dry count. Then, of course, we do launch. At dry count they're all a little, "I know we meet at the roadblock, but what all do we take? What time do we need to be there? Who do we see when we get there?" Things like this.\n\n Then once we get out to the vehicle, they're dependent on you to take care of all the small stuff. Like I say, they're out there looking at switch configurations. As far as the vehicle being ready for the crewmen, they're depending on you to make sure that the seats are ready and harnesses are laid out, and everything's ready for them to go. It's important, because it's a stressful time for them. They want to make sure that there's somebody there.\n\n If you have a problem at the pad, you know what to do about it. We take spares of just about everything that we can out there with us—helmets, com caps, everything—so that if something happens we can swap something out at the last minute. Of course, time is of the importance there. Especially Mir flights, where you have a five-, six-minute launch window, you can't spend thirty minutes troubleshooting something. You've got to be able to react quickly and make the changes, or just to get the strap-in done. Strapping seven men in, it takes fifty minutes to do it, and sometimes it takes longer. If you run into a problem with a crewman, his com's not working right or something, you have to troubleshoot. Is it the helmet, or is it the orbiter side com? All of a sudden they have a hot spot that's hurting. Well, you've got to work that out, because you don't want them out there for two hours on their back, or three hours on their back, and that's all they can think about is this pain in the middle of their back. They have other things to be worrying about at that point, and you don't want them to have to do that.

Kevin M. Rusnak: Have there been any serious launch-related issues with your responsibilities?

S. Jean Alexander: I guess the worst that I've had is on STS-26, our first flight when we returned to flight. I worked that flight. Back then we had what we called a personal suit ventilation system. It was just a fan that drew in cabin air and blew it into the suit. That was the only means of cooling that they had. It wasn't very effective at all.\n\n The first round of suits that we had were sized military-style. The military people just basically sit in the cockpit and fly the plane, so their gear was much tighter on them than we have. When they ordered the suits for the first crew, they ordered them based on military sizing. So all of the suits were a little bit smaller than what they would wear today. If a guy wore a medium/regular then, he would be in at least a large/regular now.\n\n On STS-26, the gear was arriving daily as we were supporting events. When we went down for dry count, their suits had just come in. In fact, I think at dry count we actually only had two flight suits and the other three flight suits came in after the Terminal Countdown and Demonstration Test. We have pictures where three of them are in blue suits and two of them are in orange suits. It was things like that.\n\n While we're out the pad launch morning, these ventilators had fuses, and the fuses started blowing. We had the commander strapped in. We were working on the pilot. The fuse went out. At first we didn't know what it was, you know, the fan went off. Then they were real noisy, so you noticed right away when it went off. So we started trying to see what we could do.\n\n They wanted to get this flight off the ground right away. So I just continued with strapping, and the ASP was trying to troubleshoot the fan problem. We had two that blew the fuses that morning. The commander turned around and looked at the ASP, and he said, "If you touch another fan, I'm going to be seriously upset." He was just to that point of, "We will launch without cooling. Just leave the things alone. Don't touch another one." It was funny. It was like, I don't know, like something he was doing was causing them to go out. But we had to get fuses sent out to the pad and do last-minute changes. They did launch with "cooling." It's not very effective cooling, but it was cooling. It was kind of hectic. I guess that's the most pressure that I've been under.\n\n We all have com problems, you know, where you've had to change out helmets and com caps. But like I say, we have learned to take as many spares as we can. It's just a matter of time then to get out there and do it. But that's the first really hectic morning that I've had in a long time.

Kevin M. Rusnak: I can understand that. After the first four missions, they would just go up in their blue flight suits, right?

S. Jean Alexander: Yes.

Kevin M. Rusnak: So that maybe had some effect on your pre-launch responsibilities.

S. Jean Alexander: We still had to go out there. In some ways, it was easier. Back in those days, you have to remember, we had a much smaller group. There were about seven people. There were four NASA suit techs and then we had maybe four or five contractors that worked with us. So we were a group of ten people total, with our engineer. We did all of that. We covered the coveralls, the helmets, the harnesses. They had a portable breathing system that they could use to do an egress out of the orbiter. So we handled all of that equipment.\n\n It was not as hard in some ways, because you didn't have a suit to deal with, but the coveralls were treated cotton, so they couldn't be just washed; they had to be dry-cleaned. At dry count at the Cape, you'd have to worry about taking them to a cleaners and making sure they got back from the cleaners. You'd never know who was going to want to take a souvenir or something. You always worried about things like that.\n\n You'd be surprised at how hard it was to fit coveralls. I mean, when you're dressing like that, they want to look good. So they would want them fitted. It was almost as much trouble doing that as it is fitting them in a launch and entry suit, in some ways. The maintenance wasn't quite as bad.\n\n Then we had the launch entry helmets that they wore. We were in charge of testing those and keeping those up. So it was still quite a bit with fewer people.

Kevin M. Rusnak: Were you responsible for any development on the launch and entry suits after Challenger?

S. Jean Alexander: When they decided to go to the launch and entry suit, they handled it in a strange fashion. Our subsystems manager, at the time, Jim Schlosser, was detailed over to the Manned Systems Division and he went to work in another building. He took some of the contractor people in our group that are here now and worked most of the development with just four or five people over there. I'm not for sure why it was handled that way. We weren't very happy about it, because there were three of us sitting over here with not much to do at that time.\n\n Then the equipment started hitting the doors. From our standpoint, we saw obvious problems right off the bat. For one thing, the parachutes came in with nine-inch risers. Nine inches isn't very long. The crewman's on his back. This riser has to come over and attach to a frost-bitting that's level with their armpits.\n\n I remember Al and I went out to California to support the qualification jumps on the parachute in the suit. It was one of our first experiences with the equipment. We're attaching this parachute to the jumper, and you had to actually hold the parachute up over his shoulders to do this connection. Then it came down and connected to the lower portion. Al and I looked at each other, like, "Yes, right. I can see this, you know, a guy laying on his back and us being able to do this." We went back and told them, and they were like, "Well, it'll work."\n\n I can remember the first training exercises over in Building 9 with the 26 crew and trying to get those parachutes attached. I mean, it was murder for both sides. It was really, really, really hard to do. And it really, really, really hurt them, so we ended up going to twelve-inch risers and ten-inch risers. Small people, the smaller females, wear the ten-inch and then everybody else has a twelve-inch. Things like that, I think we could have helped with a little bit more, just because they had Al and Troy’s background to fall on. I had been doing it for a while at that point, but not nearly as much as they had. Some things like that that might have made a little bit of difference. But the group of people working that were really good. Jim Schlosser was probably the best in the business at that time. They did a really good job, considering the time that they had to work with. There were several astronauts that worked really close with them in the development of the launch and entry suits.

Kevin M. Rusnak: What type of responsibilities do you have when you're not preparing for a specific mission?

S. Jean Alexander: Well, just maintenance of the hardware; the crew worn drawing, keeping it up to date; the lab itself. We do other kinds of testing in here. People use the lab for different things. We usually don't have much down time. This is really strange, between STS-91 and STS-95, having these months here, three or four months in between flights. We're all still coming in each day kind of dazed; we look at the schedule and don't see just back-to-back training. So we'll take the time to do the more time-consuming repairs. We have a lot of liquid-cooling underwear, the elastic is stretched out. It's been like that for a long time. We've been needing to replace it, but we just haven't had the people or the time to do it.\n\n Like I say, we've got the individual cooling units that we've had in-house for quite a while now, but they're not totally certified yet. So hopefully we'll try to finish up and get whatever testing and documentation that's needed for that, help Stephanie Walker get that done so we can start flying those.\n\n On liquid cooling, part of the problem is people are either too cold when you first turn it on, so they want to shut some of the flow down. But if you throttle them back and then you get hot, it's hard for the unit to make it up. So you want to keep that water as cold as you can and then just be able to use it when you need it. Right now what they have to do involves a pincher valve that pinches off the flow and shuts it down. Max Kandler is working on a little throttle valve that will actually let them do a mix of cool water and circulate. We’ll spend some time looking at stuff like that during our down time.

Kevin M. Rusnak: Are you assigned to the next shuttle flight?

S. Jean Alexander: Yes, I'm on STS-95.

Kevin M. Rusnak: So have you had a chance to meet or work with Senator John Glenn?

S. Jean Alexander: Yes. It's been really fun. I was kind of worried about it; I didn't know, really, what to expect. I worked with Senator Jake Garn when he flew, too. He gave out ballcaps called "Garn's ground crew." I was interested to see if John Glenn was going to do anything. So far he hasn't done that, but he has been just super to work with. He is so nice. People just approach him constantly when you're at training exercises. "Can I have my picture taken with you?" He just stops and asks, "Where do you work?" Has a few words with them and poses for the picture. He's just really super.\n\n He's brought his wife, Annie, to several of the training events. I had heard about her and how nice she was, too, and she is. She sent me a set of pictures, in fact. She brought her little camera and took pictures with him. I got a note one day that said, "Jean, I thought you might enjoy seeing these. I just enjoyed so much watching the strapping in." I've done strap-ins with a lot of crewmen and had their families there, and I've never received photos from any of them, and John Glenn's wife sent me photos. I thought that was really nice. They've just been really good.

Kevin M. Rusnak: Yes, we did an interview with him last year when he was here for his annual physical. We talked to him a little bit. That's when he was still lobbying to get on a flight. So he had a few words to say about that. Now he's obviously on the next mission.

S. Jean Alexander: We were kind of worried, whether he was going to be able to do everything that he needed to be able to do. Right after the first few events, it was very obvious that he was going to be able to do anything that he needed to do. He's really good about asking questions and understanding everything. Some people look it over while you're trying to explain it. It's like, "Yes, yes, yes, okay, I got that." Then they go out to do it and they really can't do it, because they really didn't get all the instruction. He's real good about listening and has a lot of patience. He does really well in training, therefore, because of that.

Kevin M. Rusnak: Does he ever bring up any stories of his previous flight or anything?

S. Jean Alexander: He does talk about it. He's willing to sit down if you ask him any questions.

Kevin M. Rusnak: That's terrific then, you have a chance to work with him.

S. Jean Alexander: Yes.

Kevin M. Rusnak: In your official capacity, right?

S. Jean Alexander: Yes. It's been really interesting. I got to do quite a few of the Mir flights, too. I was either there for the launch or for the landings. That was real interesting. I got to the flight that launched Shannon Lucid, and then I was there when she came home, too. So things like that are real special, I think. I like doing that.

Kevin M. Rusnak: So have any of you had a chance to work with some of the cosmonauts?

S. Jean Alexander: I did STS-60, wasn't it? That was real interesting. Of course, on the last flight, I just did STS-91 with Valeri Ryumin. It was interesting. Sergei Krikalev spoke English real well, so training was real easy. Ryumin didn't speak English, and it was definitely much harder. It's frustrating on his side, especially when you're trying to operate all this different equipment and attachments. I think he came in with the attitude of, "Well, somebody's going to be there to strap me in and somebody will get me out," which may be how they do it over there, so he wasn't really too worried about it. We don't operate that way. You know how to do everything in case you have to do it. It took a couple of sessions before he got with it. "Okay, I'm going to have to learn to do this." Once he put his mind to it, he was real good. But, like I say, communication was still funny.\n\n Dave Brandt from Lockheed is the one that strapped him in on the middeck. When they get in on their back, there's a strap above them that they have to lift up on to position themselves, or we'll tell them to get a hold of the bottom of the seat and pull themselves down. Well, Dave would be trying to tell him to pull down in the seat and he would reach up and pull up on the strap, and it just undoes everything that you just did and you'd have to start over. I was coming out of the flight deck going out to get my next crewman and I see Dave over there going, "No! No!" Slashing his finger across his neck trying to tell him, "No, not that!"\n\n I told him in the debrief, "I couldn't tell if Dave was threatening to kill him or was trying to get him to stop what he was doing." Things like that make it a little more interesting and harder to work with them, but it was fun.