Coba jelasin Kritik Spiral Keheningan dari Spiral keheningan dong

Charles Salmon dan rekan (1985) menyatakan bahwa  bahwa teori spiral keheningan gagal mengakomodir keterlibatan ego seseorang dalam sebuah isu. Kadang-kadang, orang mungkin bersedia untuk berbicara karena setiap keinginan mereka terlibat dalam topik (misalnya, jika promosi di tempat kerja tergantung pada ketegasan). Carroll Glynn,dan rekan (1997) mengangkat isu berbagai proses selektivitas, seperti disonansi kognitif. Individu akan menghindari topik yang bertentangan dengan pandangan mereka sendiri. Hanya sedikit dukungan empiris untuk permohonan atas hak mereka bahwa orang-orang berbicara hanya karena mereka memandang dukungan untuk pandangan mereka. J.David Kennamer (1990) mendukung kritik ini: "Cukup sulit untuk membayangkan mana yang pro dengan kehidupan atau sisi yang mendukung tentang memilih sebuah isu untuk menyerah dalam pertarungan karena mereka menganggap diri mereka berada dalam minoritas". Carroll Glynn dan rekan (1985) mencatat dua kekurangan tentang teori spiral keheningan. Pertama, mereka percaya bahwa ketakutan akan keterbatasan mungkin tidak dapat memotivasi orang untuk mengekspresikan pendapat mereka. Mereka mengklaim bahwa Noelle-Neumann tidak secara empiris menguji asumsi bahwa keterbatasan mendorong orang untuk berbicara. Kedua, mereka berpendapat bahwa Noelle-Neumann tidak mengakui pengaruh kepada masyarakat dan kelompok sebagai referensi terhadap pendapat mereka. Mereka percaya bahwa ia berfokus terlalu banyak pada media. Seiring dengan kekhawatiran tersebut, fakta bahwa perkembangan Spiral keheningan bergantung pada kondisi media pada tahun 1985 di Jerman Barat. Keraguan tentang karakteristik media (ubikuitas, kumulatif dan konsonan) menurut teori spiral keheningan dalam diterapkan pada kondisi saat ini atau tidak. Mereka tidak mempertanyakan ikatan yang relatif intim di dalam media Jerman, tetapi mereka bertanya apakah teori ini dapat diaplikasikan atau di dalam kebudayaan yang sempit seperti di Amerika Serikat. Pada akhirnya teori ini memiliki kekurangan. Jika seseorang yang mempunyai pendirian yang sangat kuat, orang tersebug tidak akan mudah mengikuti opini mayoritas yang ada disekitarnya misalnya jika opini ini menyangkut kepercayaan.

Alstyne, M. V., & Brynjolfsson, E. (1996). Electronic communities: Global village or cyberbalkans? Paper presented at the International Conference on Information Systems, Cleveland, OH.

Anderson, J.A. (1996). Communication theory: epistemological foundations. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.

Bradley, N., & Poppen, W. (2003). Assistive technology, computers and Internet may decrease sense of isolation for homebound elderly and disabled persons. Technology and Disability, 14(1).

Bowker, A., Bukowski, W., Zargarpour, S., & Hoza, B. (1998). A structural and functional analysis of a two-dimensional model of social isolation. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 44, 447-463.

Burgoon, J. K., Buller, D. B., & Woodall, W. G. (1989). Nonverbal communication: The unspoken dialogue. New York: Harper & Row.

Coleman, S., & Gøtze, J. (2001). Bowling together: Online public engagement in policy deliberation. Retrieved November, 2007, from

Cummings, J., Sproull, L., & Kiesler, S. B. (2002). Beyond hearing: Where real-world and online support meet. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research and Practice, 6(1), 78-88.

Dahlberg, L. (2001). The Internet and democratic discourse. Information, Communication & Society, 4(4), 615-633.

Gastil, J. (2000). Is face-to-face citizen deliberation a luxury or a necessity? Political Communication, 14(4), 357-361.

Gimmler, A. (2001). Deliberative democracy, the public sphere and the Internet. Philosophy and Social Criticism, 27(4), 357-361.

Gonzenbach, W.J.; King, C.; Jablonski, P. (1999). Homosexuals and the military: an analysis of the spiral of silence. Howard Journal of Communication, 4, 281-296.

Gonzenbach, W.J.; Stevenson, R.L. (1994). Children with AIDS attending public school: an analysis of the spiral of silence. Political Communication, 1, 3-18.

Gottman, J., Gonso, J., & Rasmussen, B. (1975). Social interaction, social competence, and friendship in children. Child development|Child Development, 46(3), 709-718.

Hayes, A. F., Glynn, C. J., & Shanahan, J. (2005a). Willingness to self-censor: A construct and measurement tool for public opinion research. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 17, 298-323.

Hayes, A. F., Glynn, C. J., & Shanahan, J. (2005b). Validating the willingness to self-censor scale: Individual differences in the effect of the climate of opinion on opinion expression, 17, 443-455.

Hiltz, S. R., Johnson, K., & Turoff, M. (1986). Experiments in group decision making: Communication process and outcome in face-to-face versus computerized conferences. Human Communication Research, 13, 225-252.

Kiesler, S., Siegel, J., & McQuire, T. W. (1984). Social psychology|Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication. American Psychologist, 39, 1123-1134.

Kraut, R. E., Patterson, M., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukhopadhyay, T., & Scherlis, W. (1998). Internet paradox: A social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being? American Psychologies, 53(9), 1017-1032.

McDevitt, M., Kiousis, S., & Wahl-Jorgensen, K. (2003). Spiral of moderation: Opinion expression in computer-mediated discussion. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 15(4), 454-470.

McKenna, K. Y. A., & Bargh, J. A. (1998). Coming out in the age of the Internet: Identity "demarginalization" through virtual group participation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(3), 681-694.

Moody, E. J. (2001). Internet use and its relationship to loneliness. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 4(3), 393-401.

Morris, M., & Ogan, C. (2002). The internet as mass medium. In D. McQauil (Ed.), McQuail's Reader in Mass Communication Theory. London: Sage

Moy, P.; Domke, D.; Stamm, K. (2001). The spiral of silence and public opinion on affirmative action. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 1, 7-25.

Noelle-Neumann, E. (1993). The Spiral of Silence: Public Opinion - Our Social Skin. University of Chicago Press.

Noelle-Neumann, E. (1974). The spiral of silence: a theory of public opinion. Journal of Communication, 24, 43-51

O'Connor, R. D. (1969). Modification of social withdrawal through symbolic modeling. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 2, 15-22.

O'Connor, R. D. (1972). Relative efficacy of modeling, shaping, and the combined procedures for modification of social withdrawal. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 79, 327-334.

O'Hara, K. (2002). The Internet: A tool for democratic pluralism? Science as Culture, 11(2), 287-298.

O'Sullivan, P. B. (1995). Computer networks and political participation: Santa Monica's teledemocracy project. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 23, 93-107.

Page, B. I. (1996). Who deliberates? Mass Media in Modern Democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Rheingold, H. (1993). The virtual community. Homesteading on the electronic frontier: Reading

Rice, R. E., & Williams, F. (1984). Theories old and new: The study of new media. In R. E. Rice (Ed.), The new media: Communication, research, and technology (pp. 55–80). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

Sassenberg, K. (2002). Common bond and common identity groups on the Internet: Attachment and normative behaviors in on-topic and off-topic chats. Group Dynamics, 6(1), 27-37.

Scheufele, D. A., & Moy, P. (2000). Twenty-five years of the spiral of silence: A conceptual review and empirical outlook. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 12(1), 3-28.

Schmierback, M.; Boyle, M.P.; McLeod, D.M. (2005). Civic attachment in the aftermath of September 11. Mass Communication and Society, 4, 323-346.

Shanahan, J.; Dietram Scheufele, D.A.; Fang Yang; Hizi, S. (2004). Cultivation and spiral of silence effects:the case of smoking. Mass Communication and Society, 4, 413-428.

Short, J., Williams, E., & Christie, B. (1976). The social psychology of telecommunications. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Sleek, S. (1998). Isolation increases with Internet use. American Psychological Association Monitor, 29(1), 1.

Sproull, L., & Kiesler, S. (1992). Connections: New ways of working in the networked organization. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Stromer-Galley, J. (2002). New voices in the political sphere: A comparative analysis of interpersonal and online political talk. Javnost/The Public, 9(2), 23-42.

Wallace, P. (1999). The psychology of the Internet. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

Wanta, W., & Dimitrova, D. (2000). Chatrooms and the spiral of silence: An examination of online discussions during the final 1996 United States presidential election debates|U.S. presidential debate. Paper presented at the International Communication Association, Acapulco, Mexico.

Warren, M. E. (2001). What should we expect from more democracy? Radically democratic responses to politics. Political Theory, 24(2), 241-270.

Williams, E. (1977). Experimental comparison of face-to-face and mediated communication: A review. Psychological Bulletin, 84, 963-976.

Witschge, T. (2002). Online Deliberation: Possibilities of the Internet for deliberative democracy. Paper presented at the Euricom Colloquium Electronic Networks & Democratic Engagement, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.