解析

電算同語言學入面，解析係指分析一串語言資訊，決定佢喺某種中嘅語法結構嘅過程。

喺電算，上面講嘅語言資訊並唔係源碼，而係一種叫 嘅數據， 係已經用掃描器將原碼掃咗一次，而得出嘅識別碼、保留字、字串、數字或者其他符號，而解析就係指將 token 重新組合成一種對應原內容語法結構嘅數據結構，方便以後處理，用嘅數據結構通常會係一棵樹，叫解析樹，而做呢樣嘢嘅嘢就叫解析器。

Parsing is also an earlier term for the diagramming of sentences of natural languages, and is still used for the diagramming of inflected languages, such as the Roman languages or Latin.

There are tools, called parser generators, that can automatically generate a parser (in some programming language) from a grammar written in Backus-Naur form (e.g. Yacc - yet another compiler compiler).

人話 

In some machine translation and natural language processing systems, human languages are parsed by computer programs. Human sentences are not easily parsed by programs, as there is substantial ambiguity in the structure of human language. In order to parse natural language data, researchers must first agree on the grammar to be used. The choice of syntax is affected by both linguistic and computational concerns; for instance some parsing systems use lexical functional grammar, but in general, parsing for grammars of this type is known to be NP-complete. Head-driven phrase structure grammar is another linguistic formalism which has been popular in the parsing community, but other research efforts have focused on less complex formalisms such as the one used in the Penn Treebank. Shallow parsing aims to find only the boundaries of major constituents such as noun phrases. Another popular strategy for avoiding linguistic controversy is dependency grammar parsing.

Most modern parsers are at least partly statistical; that is, they rely on a corpus of training data which has already been annotated (parsed by hand). This approach allows the system to gather information about the frequency with which various constructions occur in specific contexts. (See machine learning.) Approaches which have been used include straightforward PCFGs (probabilistic context free grammars), maximum entropy, and neural nets. Most of the more successful systems use lexical statistics (that is, they consider the identities of the words involved, as well as their part of speech). However such systems are vulnerable to overfitting and require some kind of smoothing to be effective.

Parsing algorithms for natural language cannot rely on the grammar having 'nice' properties as with manually-designed grammars for programming languages. As mentioned earlier some grammar formalisms are very computationally difficult to parse; in general, even if the desired structure is not context-free, some kind of context-free approximation to the grammar is used to perform a first pass. Algorithms which use context-free grammars often rely on some variant of the CKY algorithm, usually with some heuristic to prune away unlikely analyses to save time. (See chart parsing.) However some systems trade speed for accuracy using, eg, linear-time versions of the shift-reduce algorithm. A somewhat recent development has been parse reranking in which the parser proposes some large number of analyses, and a more complex system selects the best option.

程式語言 

The most common use of a parser is as a component of a compiler. This parses the source code of a computer programming language to create some form of internal representation. Programming languages tend to be specified in terms of a context-free grammar because fast and efficient parsers can be written for them. Parsers are usually not written by hand but are generated by parser generators.

Context-free grammars are limited in the extent to which they can express all of the requirements of a language. Informally, the reason is that the memory of such a language is limited. The grammar cannot remember the presence of a construct over an arbitrarily long input; this is necessary for a language in which, for example, a name must be declared before it may be referenced. More powerful grammars that can express this constraint, however, cannot be parsed efficiently. Thus, it is a common strategy to create a relaxed parser for a context-free grammar which accepts a superset of the desired language constructs (that is, it accepts some invalid constructs); later, the unwanted constructs can be filtered out.

Overview of process 
The following example demonstrates the common case of parsing a computer language with two levels of grammar: lexical and syntactic. 

The first stage is the token generation, or lexical analysis, by which the input character stream is split into meaningful symbols defined by a grammar of regular expressions. For example, a calculator program would look at an input such as "12*(3+4)^2" and split it into the tokens 12, *, (, 3, +, 4, ), ^ and 2, each of which is a meaningful symbol in the context of an arithmetic expression. The parser would contain rules to tell it that the characters *, +, ^, ( and ) mark the start of a new token, so meaningless tokens like "12*" or "(3" will not be generated.

The next stage is syntactic parsing or syntactic analysis, which is checking that the tokens form an allowable expression. This is usually done with reference to a context-free grammar which recursively defines components that can make up an expression and the order in which they must appear. However, not all rules defining programming languages can be expressed by context-free grammars alone, for example type validity and proper declaration of identifiers. These rules can be formally expressed with attribute grammars.

The final phase is semantic parsing or analysis, which is working out the implications of the expression just validated and taking the appropriate action. In the case of a calculator, the action is to evaluate the expression; a compiler, on the other hand, would generate code. Attribute grammars can also be used to define these actions.

解析器嘅款 

The task of the parser is essentially to determine if and how the input can be derived from the start symbol of the grammar. This can be done in essentially two ways:
Top-down parsing - A parser can start with the start symbol and try to transform it to the input. Intuitively, the parser starts from the largest elements and breaks them down into incrementally smaller parts. LL parsers are examples of top-down parsers.
Bottom-up parsing - A parser can start with the input and attempt to rewrite it to the start symbol. Intuitively, the parser attempts to locate the most basic elements, then the elements containing these, and so on. LR parsers are examples of bottom-up parsers. Another term used for this type of parser is Shift-Reduce parsing.

Another important distinction is whether the parser generates a leftmost derivation or a rightmost derivation (see context-free grammar). LL parsers will generate a leftmost derivation and LR parsers will generate a rightmost derivation (although usually in reverse).

解析器嘅例

Top-down parsers 
Some of the parsers that use top-down parsing include:
 Recursive descent parser
 LL parser

Bottom-up parsers 
Some of the parsers that use bottom-up parsing include:
 Precedence parser
 Operator-precedence parser
 Simple precedence parser
 BC (bounded context) parsing
 LR parser
 SLR parser
 LALR parser (Shift Reduce)
 Canonical LR parser
 GLR parser
 CYK parser

參攷 
Parsing Techniques - A Practical Guide web page of book includes downloadable pdf.

再睇下

解析器嘅概念 
 Chart parser
 Compiler-compiler
 Deterministic parsing
 Lexing
 Shallow parsing

整解析器嘅軟件 
See also: List of Parsers comparison table.

自由軟件 
 ANTLR
 Bison
 Coco/R
 GOLD
 JavaCC
 Lemon Parser
 Lex
 Rebol
 SableCC
 Spirit Parser Framework
 SYNTAX
 YACC

維基媒體

商 
 LRGen
 Visual BNF

電算