In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

[EX Q]: Comment: Just think, If Ben Cayetano had not been blasted along with Tom Berg we would have a much more honest government in Hawaii. We would have NO ELEVATED STEEL ON STEEL RAIL FROM ALMOST KAPOLEI TO A LUXURY SHOPPING MALL FOR THE RICH. With Ben it would have been  NO NEW TAXES & with Tom a City Councilman who would not accept bribes from Ansaldo & The Unions could not push into a corner. BUT instead we got the SHAFT from The Caldwell administration and the worst Attorney General & City Council money can buy in the United States. Oh yeah no problems in Hawaii but the Attorney General attacts President Trump at every chance. We should export the Attorney General & John White of PRP. Remember to call today your City Council Member over the Bond sale putting us more in debt for the choo choo.
[EX A]: Non-sexual-explicit

[EX Q]: Comment: He does not say that the Paris agreement says what you say it says - he says that the result of the agreement is that China goes on polluting until 2030 and that sucker nations , such as Canada, go on paying into the Global Environmental fund; but enjoy your ignorance whilst it lasts.
[EX A]: Non-sexual-explicit

[EX Q]: Comment: But Big Glenn, 
"A Canadian is a Canadian is a Canadian " 
Unless you are living in Justin's Liberal Montreal !!!
My suggestion, move to  Alberta - your rights will be repected.
The hypocrisy of the Liberals  is truly epic.
[EX A]:
Non-sexual-explicit