We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

[Q]: Sent1: The only way the person would get the gun back is if the person was found not guilty.
 Sent2: But that does not change the fact that the law has made the individual into a prohibited person, so that her gun possession is, in itself, a federal felony.
[A]: Not similar


[Q]: Sent1: I like guns as much as the normal person does but if guns are abused by people, we need restictions.
 Sent2: I like how anti gun people say we need to protect everyone from the rare gun events by banning guns, but when someone suggests banning the more frequent hammer and club attacks, they can justify those deaths.
[A]: Not similar


[Q]: Sent1: All gun free zones can do, is keep law-abiding citizens from having guns.
 Sent2: Making a gun free zone does nothing to prevent guns from entering it.
[A]:
Similar