We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

Input: Consider Input: Ratify a new constitutional amendment explicitly spelling out that no government in America may ever pass any law that would blanketly ban the ownership or purchase of any model firearm, component or ammunition.

Output: Valid


Input: Consider Input: And if a person has had treatment for a mental disorder, they should be given a mandatory psych exam by a neautral doctor before being denied on a gun purchase.

Output: Valid


Input: Consider Input: The gun wont kill you without someone behind it, not all people have the right reasons for haveing a gun, but does that mean people who do have the right reasons will be punished and left unarmed, and defensless?


Output: Valid