In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Comment: Right Steve, because the McGuinty, Butts, Wynne's "green" plan is paying off in spades... the Ontario Liberals are a national embarrassment, they have no credibility and their "green" plan has turned out to be an absolute failure. Canadians who actually work for a living understand this, the smug limousine liberals who will be protected by fat golden pensions couldn't care less about rising costs of living and weaker economic competitiveness, it's not going to have any material impact on Wynne's ability to sip daiquiris in Cabo. This new tax will hurt working Canadians with higher living expenses and less economic opportunity.Trudeau operates with a smug sense of unearned entitlement, he lives in a cushioned dream of puff and ignorance. Butts sewered Ontario and now he wants to double down with the same incompetent policies on the rest of Canada.
Non-sexual-explicit

Comment: The assertion by self_reliance about unions at United is, of course, ridiculous.  United has had unions for decades and many of those decades included superb service from United.  It is, as always, a crisis of leadership.  When things go bad, organizationally, then it is a leadership issue, pure and simple.
Non-sexual-explicit

Comment: So who is going to be put in charge of waking up the homeless and having them tear down their tents? Parking lot attendants? The police? How long is it going to take until homeless advocates go in there with cameras recording the homeless getting waken up and being told to move out, then complain about how inhumane it is to force them to move? Who is going to front the insurance claims when peoples' vehicles inevitably get broken into? The city (*cough* taxpayers *cough*)? Or will they just deny that it was due to the homeless camp they created and it was just a "random act"? Where are these people going to go to the bathroom? Where are their dogs going to go to the bathroom? They already defecate all up in the stairwells, this will just make it much worse. Is the city going to spend the extra money for custodial cleaning of all the stairwells every morning so commuters paying to park don't have to avoid piss and crap on their way to work?

Non-sexual-explicit