In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Ex Input:
Comment: Well, we sure are touchy about "words".  But real action is no big deal, right?  I especially like the comment in the article that Trump's quicker to act to defend Muslims...by sending cruise missiles.  LMAO...uh, you think those babies don't take out humans?  

And, the humans on that base were likely Muslim.  So, we're protecting Muslims by killing Muslims.  Said that way, it's kinda counter-productive, isn't it?

Ex Output:
Non-sexual-explicit


Ex Input:
Comment: Putin doesn't want to weaken Europe, he wants to make deals with them and empower them as much as anyone. What he does want to do is cut the strings of their master puppeteer  and liberate them from subservience of their American controllers. This bill is not going over too well in Europe and particularly in Germany where energy pipelines are being built from Russia to provide energy security to Europe and Germans.. The Americans are dreaming if they think they will replace this source  with their expensive energy supplies. Don't be too smug the fallout will come back to America to bite them you know where sooner than you think.

Ex Output:
Non-sexual-explicit


Ex Input:
Comment: The commandment was a property crime, not a purity crime.  Nocturnal emissions, (the closest thing mentioned in relation to masturbation) required taking a bath.  Sounds about right.  

Was Jesus obedient to the lawful authority of the pharisees and the scribes?  He was said to be without sin, not immune to it because of his divinity (that would have been really cheap grace).  You need to rethink the concept of obedience. You conflate it with loyalty, not truth.

Ex Output:

Sexual-explicit