Based on the given context, craft a common-sense question, especially those that are LONG, INTERESTING, and COMPLEX. The goal is to write questions that are easy for humans and hard for AI machines! To create such questions, here are some suggestions: A. What may (or may not) be the plausible reason for an event? B. What may (or may not) happen before (or after, or during) an event? C. What may (or may not) be a plausible fact about someone (or something)? D. What may (or may not) happen if an event happens (or did not happen)? You can also create other types of questions. DO NOT make your question answerable without looking at the context, or question of which the correct answer can be directly extracted from the context. DO NOT ask a question that requires very specialized knowledge that is not common sense. DO NOT ask too simple or too short questions. Your question must be related to the context and answerable with common sense. Try to add more variations and complexity to the questions.

Context: But buy buying it helps me to smoke less , males juga ya duit abis buat beli rokok . It is still a challenge but it 'll eventually come to an end ... the chain smoking I mean , not the casual smoking HAHA . After all , one of my best friends in high school is coming to Sydney this weekend and I am sure with him - it 's nothing but the club , alcohol and cigarettes .
Why do I think the chain smoking will come to an end ?

Context: And it may be some need to justify this theory that is influencing my perceptions , but the fact he chose hallucination over reality in the end may as well be a metaphor for the same thing . And then I read the following passage , which came a little bit later in Jacob 's recap . The definition of madness is the inability to filter out the false from the true ... Our bodies know better , they call it dreaming , and they force us awake . Stay there and become mad , become chimerical , abominable , something that can not exist .
Why did he choose hallucination over reality ?

Context: My statement was calculated to 1 ) assert that I would not put up with any bureaucratic asininity , and 2 ) give the clerk a chance to sympathize , to groan with me over the stupid little rules she is made to enforce . After all , I was n't criticizing her at all ; it 's an idiotic rule that an in - state ID does n't count as proof of residency , and her colleagues in another office were lax in not documenting the proof of residency I had had to show them to get the ID in the first place . Cutting red tape is an art . She did n't take the out .

What may have been your reason for calculating your statement ?