In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.

[EX Q]: Comment: This is actually offensive by Trudeau.

He said "we were looking for an idiot, we found a native"

It's basically racist.

Also, there are negative connotations to Aboriginals and 'always fighting'.

It's like saying: "we were looking for a drunk idiot, we found an Irishman"

And I say this as one who is basically never offended by anything.

The PM could have just said "we were looking for a fool, we found a Conservative" - it would be fine.

There was no reason to bring 'Aboriginal' into it.
[EX A]: Disagree

[EX Q]: Comment: "One can understand the outrage. Christians' Christmas and the Lord's prayer are banished from schools."

Rubbish. 100% certifiable drek. No religion is banished from Canadian classrooms. Instead, ALL religions are treated equally.
[EX A]: Disagree

[EX Q]: Comment: Donald Trump still doesn't understand that free speech also protects opinions he doesn't agree with.
[EX A]:
Agree