In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

[EX Q]: Sentence: The table won't fit through the doorway because it is too wide.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the table because it is so large that the door is too narrow. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
[EX A]: Correct

[EX Q]: Sentence: Fred watched TV while George went out to buy groceries. After an hour he got up.
 Reason: The 'he' refers to fred because he is the one who does most of the work. He is also a very good cook. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
[EX A]: Wrong

[EX Q]: Sentence: I put the butterfly wing on the table and it broke.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the butterfly wing because Actually, the red pronoun "it" refers to the table, wich was broken by the weight of the heavy book being placed on it. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
[EX A]:
Wrong