Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.

Input: Consider Input: Jules Bailey and the Portland Association of Teachers support mayor Hales’ refusal to allow the people, the Press, other elected officials and candidates for public office access to meaningful, accurate, complete and timely PUBLIC* and AFFORDABLE** Housing Statistical Data.

Jules Bailey and the Portland Association of Teachers support mayor Hales and the city council’s deliberate misuse of language to confuse voters and taxpayers by calling all “PUBLIC”* housing “AFFORDABLE”** housing.

Jules Bailey and the Portland Association of Teachers oppose the HUD favored policy of Equitable Distribution of Public Housing clients.

*
PUBLIC HOUSING is a class of housing defined as, Means Test (<=80%MFI) + Government Subsidy (any government any type) + rental agreement.

**
AFFORDABLE HOUSING is a mathematical construct defined as, Rent/Mortgage + Insurance + Taxes + Utilities <=30% Household Income. EVERY house, condo and apartment is AFFORDABLE to someone.

2 of 5

Output: No


Input: Consider Input: This guy is a Bushy.

We all know how much they did for the country.

Output: No


Input: Consider Input: I've been around drugs enough to know FORcA FACT that opiate drug users seak these doctors out and are highly aware of the presence for cheap/legally prescribed drugs. They get a few of their buddies to round up a few hundred dollars cash to get in, then they divide up the drug prescription. You act like a doctor who runs a pill mill, and he does, do not kid yourself so you can make an opposing comment/opinion, that he would not know the exact patients to prescive and the excuses he can use. Drug users do not go to get bottles of pills to go kill themselves. They go to get high. If you want evidence, go to every patient he most recently prescribed and do a pill count and new large TV purchases.


Output: No