Given a document, an entity and its sentiment towards the entity, verify if it is the correct sentiment towards the entity. Answer should be yes or no. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Schaffer Wice is Neutral . The media-savvy special prosecutors have colluded with the Fourth Estate to try — and convict — Paxton in the court of public opinion long before the case even comes to trial.  Wice  in particular is an aspiring media celebrity  serving as a TV “legal analyst” on Houston’s Channel 2 (KPRC) since 2003. Think of a male version of Nancy Grace or Greta Van Susteren — a Dan Abrams wannabe. One profile described the bombastic  Wice  as a “media magnet” who “never shies away from the spotlight.” The KPRC website brags that
Beginning the very day  Schaffer  and Wice were appointed by Becker  the prosecutors were in contact with the media  shamelessly promoting themselves by mass distributing press statements and publicity photos.  Schaffer  and  Wice  obviously intended to milk the case for all the news coverage they could get  for two self-serving reasons: to poison the well of public opinion against Paxton  and to generate free advertising to attract future clients. Neither motive is ethical for a special prosecutor. Yet   Wice  has conceded that pretrial media coverage “impacts the way potential jurors view our client’s case long before they are ushered into the courtroom for voir dire. Being able to effectively represent your client on the courthouse steps can be every bit as important as representing them inside the courtroom.”
Moreover   Wice  once cynically acknowledged the economic benefits of making media appearances  informing fellow lawyers that “appearing on TV is client development — free advertising — that might well yield future business. And you never can tell what that one local  or  with a bit of good fortune  national TV appearance  can do for you or your practice.” Exploiting the media  in other words  is the latest form of ambulance chasing. “Celebrity” attorneys  like the Kardashians  are famous for being famous.
In that vein  Schaffer and Wice continued a steady stream of self-aggrandizing communications with the press corps during the “investigation” and grand jury phases  despite the strict secrecy associated with the grand jury process. The special prosecutors had numerous communications (by email and telephone) with the New York Times’ reporter early in the case  following which the NYT reported Paxton’s indictment on August 1  2015  before the indictment was even unsealed. Was this national media scoop a coincidence? The special prosecutors were the obvious source of the highly-unprofessional leak  but the press corps gratefully reciprocated by uncritically reporting  Wice ’s spin as “news.”
In addition to regularly sending eager reporters status updates and copies of pleadings and orders  on at least two occasions  Wice  circulated to the media Paxton’s annual Personal Financial Statement  presumably to encourage reporters to scrutinize the donors to Paxton’s legal defense fund — a wholly improper purpose. In an even more egregious breach of propriety   Wice  emailed a copy of Paxton’s booking “mugshot” to his KPRC colleague  reporter Phil Archer  shortly after Paxton was released on bail. The only word to describe this type of conduct is “sleazy.”
Intemperately denouncing Paxton’s legal arguments as “frivolous” and “clearly baseless ” the special prosecutors’ tone toward Paxton dripped with contempt as they delivered sound bites to groveling reporters on deadline. When asked by a reporter about a new attorney joining the Paxton defense team to deal with the federal civil case (which was ultimately dismissed with prejudice)   Schaffer  sarcastically responded “Never heard of him. Looks like we set off the Lawyer Relief Act…” When a prominent Paxton supporter wrote an op-ed in the Midland Reporter-Telegram  criticizing the indictment  the thin-skinned prosecutors immediately issued a florid press statement — presumably on the taxpayers’ nickel — condemning the piece as a “rant” containing “lies bathed in the cologne of half-truths  fabrications and disinformation.”
Mimicking the prosecutors’ flippant and unprofessional tone  some reporters began running stories with shockingly-unbalanced headlines  such as “Another Day  Another Idiotic Ken Paxton Motion ” which  Schaffer  and Wice gleefully circulated to their media contacts  with the message “I love it.” If media outlets did not parrot the prosecutors’ swaggering narrative  they were cut off from “insider access.”
This incestuous arrangement likely explains why the Dallas Morning News  which was closely following the Paxton case  never reported the bombshell mentioned in Part 2 — that  Schaffer  was named as an unindicted co-conspirator in a federal RICO case against the leader of the Bandidos motorcycle gang — a revelation that would have greatly tarnished the special prosecutors’ undeserved Boy Scout image — which McGaughy had gone to extraordinary lengths to burnish.
This apparently referred to Paxton’s retention of a defense team that included Dan Cogdell and Philip Hilder  with respect to whom  Schaffer  and Wice issued polite public statements.
The hundreds of email exchanges between the prosecutors and reporters (McGaughy in particular) are clearly collusive. With the avid cooperation of the press corps  for two and a half years  Schaffer  and Wice have been busy smearing Paxton through leaks and planted stories  all while risibly claiming to be “seeking justice on behalf of the people of Texas.”
To re-cap this series: The baseless  politicized prosecution of Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton has been a travesty on many levels. Following the recusal of Collin County District Attorney Greg Willis  the matter should not have been referred to mercenary “special prosecutors” for investigation;  Schaffer  (the unindicted co-conspirator in a RICO case) and Wice (an incorrigible diva) were not suitable for the assignment in any event; the open-ended compensation arrangement agreed to by Judge Scott Becker was both unlawful and foolhardy; the grand jury indictment improperly obtained by the unscrupulous prosecutors amounts to fabricated felonies — made-up crimes never previously prosecuted in a Texas court; the overtly-biased George Gallagher presided over the case as a farcical kangaroo court; changing the venue of the case to Harris County was an absurd and outrageous denial of due process to Paxton; et cetera  ad infinitum.
no

Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Bernie Sanders is Negative . 62153 62153 62153 Booker co-sponsoring Bernie Sanders ' health care bill Booker is signing on to the health care plan , along with other senators likely to contend for the 2020 Democratic presidential nomination . 
Sanders ' office has announced he will introduce the bill on Wednesday . 
Sen. Cory Booker announced first on NJTV News that he is co-sponsoring Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders ' single-payer health care bill . 
The "Medicare for all" plan has been estimated to cost $ 1.38 trillion per year and would be paid for with a combination of limiting tax deductions and increasing income tax for the wealthy , according to Sanders ' website . 
"The only long-term solution to America 's health care crisis is a single-payer national health care program ," said Sanders . 
As a presidential candidate in 2016 , Sanders made single-payer health care a key part of his platform . 
Sen. Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts and California Sen. Kamala Harris have already announced they are co-sponsoring Sanders ' bill .
no

Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Jacob Zuma is Neutral . South African Deputy President Cyril Ramaphosa leaves Parliament in Cape Town  South Africa  Tuesday  Feb. 6  2018  after it was announced that this years state of the nation address that was to be delivered on Thursday will be postponed. Officials say  South African President Jacob Zuma  will not make the state of the nation address because of concerns that lawmakers may disrupt the event. (Associated Press)
South African opposition parties say the country is in âlimboâ as the ruling African National Congress party struggles to resolve its internal conflict over  President Jacob Zuma   who is under pressure to resign because of corruption scandals.
The parties say their leaders will meet on Monday to discuss a scheduled motion of no confidence in  Zuma  on Feb. 22 as well as parliamentâs mandate to elect a new president in the event that  Zuma  is removed.
Deputy President Cyril Ramaphosa  who is expected to replace  Zuma   says he anticipates a âspeedy resolutionâ to transition talks he is holding with  the president . Ramaphosa says there is âa lot of speculation and anxietyâ about the status of  the president  and that South Africa is going through a challenging time.
 The deputy of South African President Jacob Zuma  says  he  anticipates a âspeedy resolutionâ to  his  talks with  the president  about a power transition.
Deputy President Cyril Ramaphosa  who is expected to replace the scandal-tainted  Zuma   on Wednesday acknowledged âa lot of speculation and anxietyâ about the status of  the president  and says South Africa is undergoing a challenging time.
Ramaphosa says in a statement that he is talking to  Zuma  about âthe transition and matters relating to  his  position as the President of the Republic.â
 The deputy president  says  he  expects that  he  and  Zuma  will report to the ruling party and the country in the coming days.
South Africaâs embattled president calls it âfakeâ news â a social media report that  Russian President Vladimir Putin  was going to visit the country this week.  President Jacob Zuma âs office is also denying allegations by opponents that  he  is preparing to fire the deputy who is poised to take  his  job.
The disputed announcements Tuesday illustrate the uncertainty in South Africa  where  Zuma  faces pressure to resign over alleged corruption. The speaker of parliament said  Zuma  will not give the state of the nation address in parliament Thursday and the ruling party announced the postponement of a key meeting Wednesday to discuss  the president âs fate.
While  Zuma  and Deputy President Cyril Ramaphosa are holding talks on the leadership crisis  the protracted wait for a resolution is fueling national anxiety.

yes