We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

[Q]: Sent1: Doesn't hold together, though - you have no evidence that criminal arms supply is unaffected by gun control.
 Sent2: Gun control in the U.S. does not equal crime control.
[A]: Not similar


[Q]: Sent1: No mortal man has the right to deny me the ability to maintain life within my body.
 Sent2: I for one would rather be able to defend my children without the risk of trying to overpower another person to keep the bat from hitting my children.
[A]: Not similar


[Q]: Sent1: Saw a great article today by Michael Bloomberg (yes, that Michael Bloomberg), about where the illegal guns used in crimes come from - mainly from the states with weak gun control laws.
 Sent2: So how is controlling the law-abiding going to help when murder is already illegal, it is already illegal for a convicted criminal to be even in the same room as a gun.
[A]:
Not similar