In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

[EX Q]: Comment: We have the most worthless Congress ever...the party that now finds itself in power had no idea they were going to win and no plan of what to do had they won. The establishment preordained this year to be a "battle" between Low Energy Jeb and Crooked Hillary with the latter taking the throne. The Republicans were expecting to be the opposition which is apparently all they're good at save Rand Paul and few others...totally worthless. Trump could make a deal with anyone until he met McConnell, Ryan, and McCann. The states who reelect these career hucksters deserve all of the ruin Obamacare brings them.
[EX A]: Non-identity-attack

[EX Q]: Comment: This Hitler argument is stale...arming people with military style weapons not only supports the crazy, it reflects our inability to understand why the vast majority of police favor the reasonable regulation of firearms ownership. They would also like to see regulation ammunition that's relates to the ability to kill them regulated. None of this minimal regulation would limit your freedoms...Canada has resonance gun regulations, Australia bans a number of styles of weaponry...they they both seem okay. The difference? Fewer gun deaths, fewer crazies with arms, and a clearer commitment to community safety. It's your children, our police, the neighbor down the street that desires reasonable consideration.
[EX A]: Non-identity-attack

[EX Q]: Comment: Awe you POOR THING. I can't believe you have to WALK past homeless people, it must just really ruin your day. And judging by you calling it "SE PDX" you just moved here, 'neighbor'. We sure are glad to have you
[EX A]:
Non-identity-attack