We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

[EX Q]: Eyewitnesses are frequently unreliable, DNA evidence has been overturned, and even personal confessions are unreliable: several people confessed to being the Yorkshire Ripper here in the UK who were found to have nothing to do with it.
[EX A]: Valid

[EX Q]: In every state that retains the death penalty, jurors have the option of sentencing convicted capital murderers to life in prison without the possibility of parole.
[EX A]: Valid

[EX Q]: I have a entirely different view as to what the goal of capital punishment should be.
[EX A]:
Valid