In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Ex Input:
Comment: Hillary,  the lying phony bitch, says she wants free college for all!  How about closing down their foundation on November 8th and taking all of the cash they have collected since they are giving to get favors from the never to be President and using the funds to pay for college to those in their 2nd year and beyond if they maintain a "B" average.  This would actually make their lovely daughter try and get another job that would pay her $900,000 a year!

Ex Output:
Obscene


Ex Input:
Comment: why would an international body need to step into our country's affairs to provide cover for the Librano plan? did the locals (meaning Canadians not come up with the right info for the Librano crew to sell their policy to the masses) or is it that the Keynesians at the IMF were the only ones qualified to provide this 'high level' of expert advice
'it approximates that .......' that was all I needed to read to know the report was bunk - why wasnt it done with census data to have a real picture rather than this line of shit - but that is all we seem to get from the​ Libranos and their supporters - shit

Ex Output:
Obscene


Ex Input:
Comment: Yup. They could cover that ass-hat clinton all day long, but won't. Yellow journalism at best. Pathetic that this is the only rag in town.

Ex Output:

Obscene