In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

[Q]: Comment: This firm is a train wreck, selling very very expensive funds that have not done very well.

And everyone leaving??  Obviously there is a lot of 'screwing the client' going on.
[A]: Sexual-explicit


[Q]: Comment: Wow!  Never fails any issue that touches on sex brings out the masses.
In a sense, should as sex is the center of life.
The RCC persists that "every sperm is sacred." 
Hence, because gay people will not deposit it in the proper receptacle they will always be lepers in the RCC.
That's why masturbation remains a mortal sin in the RCC.
Who can calculate the number of mortal sins committed daily?
Beyond Einstein!
But some here would say god is counting!
[A]: Sexual-explicit


[Q]: Comment: “He’s a 7-footer who is versatile, more of a combo ‘4’ who can dribble and shoot the ball,” Flo Hartenstein said. “Similar to Dirk Nowitzki, maybe more athletic.”

Flo Hartenstein is similar to LaVar Ball, maybe not quite as much of a braggart. Comparing your son to a Hall of Famer, and especially claiming he is maybe more athletic, is just silly.
[A]:
Non-sexual-explicit