In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

Example Input: Sentence: Emma's mother had died long ago, and her place had been taken by an excellent woman as governess.
 Reason: The 'her' refers to emma's mother because the mother was the ex-guardian. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Example Output: Correct

Example Input: Sentence: Bob paid for Charlie's college education, but now Charlie acts as though it never happened. He is very hurt.
 Reason: The 'He' refers to bob because Charlie is the one who acts like it never happened. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Example Output: Correct

Example Input: Sentence: Bob was playing cards with Adam and was way ahead. If Adam hadn't had a sudden run of good luck, he would have won.
 Reason: The 'he' refers to bob because Adam got lucky and did not lose to bob for he would have won if Adam had not run good luck. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Example Output:
Wrong