The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.

[Q]: Context: 'Seems like we can come to good terms here. How much of the 3 food packages do you want?' 'So, I'd love to take 2 of the food, 1 of the water, and one of the firewood.. that would leave you 1 food, 2 water, and 2 firewood.. so technically, you're actually netting a higher item count 🙂' 'That is a very fair deal. Sure you could join us at our campfire if you wanted some heat.'
Utterance: 'That would be awesome.. I'm looking forward to it.  Glad we could come up to such an amicable and easy arrangement 🙂'
[A]: No


[Q]: Context: 'Hello! What camping supplies are you looking for the most?' 'Hello! I would like more packages of food the most. What are you looking for?' 'I would need water the most as I forgot to bring enough. I can give you all my food for all of you water, if you'd like?'
Utterance: 'That would be amazing! So I could take all 3 packages of the food and you could have all 3 packages of the water. Now, we just need to split the firewood. Could I take 2 of the firewood leaving you with 1? I think I would need more for cooking the food. '
[A]: No


[Q]: Context: 'Hmm ☹️ That does not leave me with much' 'In my team old age sicked peoples and kids are there so I need some extra.' 'Is firewood something you want the most? 🙂'
Utterance: 'Yes friend.Because we are going to a snow fall place so we need firewood the most.'
[A]:
Yes