We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

[EX Q]: Sent1: You are probably going to murder somebody; hopefully it will b in a place with the death penalty and then you will get what you deserve.
 Sent2: If you think there shouldn't be a death penalty, you're an idiot.
[EX A]: Not similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: ...which is why I and many others favor life without parole, period.
 Sent2: I am advocating life in prison without the option of parole.
[EX A]: Similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: If we execute death penalty, we will not be better than murderers.
 Sent2: We should not even have the death penalty just on the off chance that we might execute somebody who is innocent.
[EX A]:
Not similar