We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Input: Consider Input: Sent1: We need to halt the death penalty before anyone else gets unjustly sentenced, then fix the problems (if that is even possible), and then, when we have safeguards in place, reinstitute it.
 Sent2: What we need are harsher sentences including the death penalty.

Output: Not similar


Input: Consider Input: Sent1: People have, and will, be executed even though they are innocent of the crime.
 Sent2: There have been numerous people who were presumed innocent after execution because the evidence showed that they were not guilty.

Output: Similar


Input: Consider Input: Sent1: You are against of violence, but have you ever thought that death penalty is also violence?
 Sent2: If you think there shouldn't be a death penalty, you're an idiot.


Output: Not similar