In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: threat and non-threat. Threat is a statement that someone will be hurt or harmed, especially if the person does not do something in particular.

Example Input: Comment: motley:  I have the illegal fireworks in my neighborhood as well. I asked the IDIOT neighbors where did you buy them, I want to get some. Ohhhhh, they said they make the best ones on the Indian Reservations up by Vancouver. The city hotline on reporting ILLEGAL Fireworks is a  JOKE. I along with approx. 12 of my neighbors have called in the last several years, NADA, the response we get is, We are getting a lot of calls and we have limited personnel. Same old CRAP..............What does one have to do, file a lawsuit??????????
Example Output: Non-threat

Example Input: Comment: Personally,I think both Murkowski and Sullivan need to go away.
Example Output: Threat

Example Input: Comment: Sir,  last I checked, irresponsible use of one's sexuality and making babies when a couple is not in a position to do so is not "family values."

The values I hold, "family values" encourage responsible use of one's sexuality.  There is nothing "family" oriented about sex outside of marriage. The values I hold, "family values" demands that people take responsibility for their choices and accept the consequences of their actions.  There is nothing "family" oriented about trying to hold everyone else responsible for one's poor choices.  

I am not a hypocrite, sir.  Your liberal logic might work on some, but it does not work on me.  The point is that murder is not morally justifiable under any circumstances.  Abortion is abortion.  Abortion does not become morally justifiable because I don't want to have to pay for someone's irresponsibility.

Could I not turn around and accuse you of hypocrisy for denouncing the death penalty yet supporting abortion?
Example Output:
Non-threat