We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Q: Sent1: There is an even smaller chance of an innocent person being sent to prison for the rest of their life, let alone to be convicted of a crime and sent to death.
 Sent2: People who commit bad crimes shouldn't be allowed to suffer in prison for the rest of their life.

A: Not similar
****
Q: Sent1: Even the people who did the study saying that innocents had been executed admitted that they cannot prove same.
 Sent2: There have been numerous people who were presumed innocent after execution because the evidence showed that they were not guilty.

A: Not similar
****
Q: Sent1: One way that would make me happy with the death penalty is if the person was killed in the same way as the person that they murdered.
 Sent2: ...and if I do someday murder someone, I should be killed.

A:
Not similar
****