We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Q: Sent1: The claim by the anti gun lobby that guns are used more often in crime than in self defence is and old one.
 Sent2: Reports show that a small percentage of gun owners actually use a gun to defend themselves, there are more killed with a gun, than those using a gun to protect themselves, they cain't say it's used for selfdefense.

A: Not similar
****
Q: Sent1: I think penfolds basic mentality is that nobody should have guns but criminals and police, and if you face a criminal with a gun, sorry about the bad luck.
 Sent2: I do not believe OTHERS should not have guns, I think criminals and psychos who are yet to convict a gun crime should not have guns.

A: Not similar
****
Q: Sent1: If the Right to Keep and Bear Arms, or any of the other rights guaranteed by the Constitution are to be abridged, they must ne done so by legal means, i.e. constitutional amendment.
 Sent2: Just because if you hang upside down and squint sideways, you can read the wording of the Second Amendment as protecting no one from anything, this does not void other places the Right to keep and bear Arms were guaranteed.

A:
Not similar
****