In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Ex Input:
Comment: Don’t let the door hit you in the ass.

Ex Output:
Sexual-explicit


Ex Input:
Comment: Speaking out against terrorists equals spreading hatred and bigotry? Where is your head?

Ex Output:
Non-sexual-explicit


Ex Input:
Comment: The A/G's testimony did a 180 between WAM and FIN budget testimony.  A Democrat senator agreed to introduce a bill he was against from the start but never gave any indication of that.  Wouldn't a sense of honesty and integrity mandate that he reveal to me that he was not in favor and refuse to introduce it?  The operative words here being "honesty" and "integrity."  Isn't it abundantly clear that many legislators are in it for their own purposes, not to serve the people of this state or permit them to actually take part?  When legislators, themselves, call the legislature out, isn't it about time that changes be made not only in some of the participants but in the process. What about conference committee where bills can be gutted and replaced and the bill comes out different than the bill citizens could review ?  The legislators involved in this Saturday Night Live version of a legislature need to hear from those they are laughing at!

Ex Output:

Non-sexual-explicit