We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Ex Input:
Sent1: Death penalty should be allowed as it deters people from committing serious crimes such as murder.
 Sent2: If these bleak prospects aren't enough to deter someone from committing a serious crime, what will ramping it up to the death penalty do?

Ex Output:
Not similar


Ex Input:
Sent1: i think that life without opportunity of parole is the more humane and just punishment instead of the death penalty.
 Sent2: If convicts believe their innocence, appeals through life imprisonment is much more justifiable because it is easier to atone for a life imprisonment as opposed to death.

Ex Output:
Not similar


Ex Input:
Sent1: No, the death penalty is society as a whole voting that someone is far too dangerous to be allowed to remain in the country and deserves to be removed.
 Sent2: Death penalty should be allowed for those who deserves it.

Ex Output:

Not similar