In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine the neutral choice based on your inference from the statement and your commonsense knowledge. The neutral choice is a sentence that neither agrees nor disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3', corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence. If sentence X agrees with sentence Y, one's correctness follows from the other one. If sentence X disagrees with sentence Y, they can not be correct at the same time.

[Q]: Statement: We have been asked to examine the reasons for state variation in unfiled returns. Choices: 1. We are to examine the reasons for state variation in unified returns. 2. We have also been asked to bake a cake. 3. We will not examine state variation in unfiled returns as we have never been asked to.
[A]: 2


[Q]: Statement: In those cases, where there is enough quantity available to satisfy most bidders, the going price will be set by the sensible middle of the pack rather than by the most overoptimistic extremist. Choices: 1. In the cases, where there is enough quantity available to satisfy most bidders, the going price will not be set by the most overoptimistic extremist, but by the sensible middle of the pack. 2. In cases, where there isn't enough quantity, the price will be higher than the middle of the pack. 3. In all cases, there is enough quantity available to satisfy most bidders.
[A]: 2


[Q]: Statement: And sometimes we use a mandrake root to capture the essence of a real man, in which case he's a mandrake-man, like you. Choices: 1. The madrake root is essential in capturing the essence. 2. There is no way to capture the essence of a real man. 3. The essence of a real man is caught by madrake root.
[A]:
1