In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

Q: Comment: Your major premise was that one is morally permitted to act on whatever inclination he's born with.  Your minor was that gays are born with a sexual attraction for men, therefore . . .
Bad major.  That was the point.

A: Identity-attack
****
Q: Comment: Religious people are nuts.

End of Story.

A: Identity-attack
****
Q: Comment: You just don't understand the situation.  When the shooter is white, the shooter is a "lone wolf" and we must all wring our hands at the impossibility of stopping such incidents.  It is *only* when the shooter is black or brown that they are properly called "terrorists" and we must then gratefully accede to low-rent authoritarianism.

A:
Identity-attack
****