In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence can be inferred from the statement. Incorrect choices change the meaning in important ways or have details that are not mentioned in the statement. Indicate your answer as 1,2, or 3 corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.

Example Input: Statement: And it is impossible to see how this difference from Rust has any bearing upon the First Amendment question, which, to repeat, is whether the funding scheme is 'manipulated' to have a 'coercive effect' on those who do not hold the subsidized position. Choices:  1. It is not possible to see how this difference from Rust has any bearing on the First Amendment question. 2. The difference from Rust on the First Amendment question is very noticeable. 3. The question that was asked it really rather very subjective.
Example Output: 1

Example Input: Statement: These estimates are conservatively high given that recent FGD systems are operating at near stoichiometric levels8 and additives are commonly used to achieve higher SO2 removal, particularly to enhance the performance of existing retrofits. Choices:  1. The estimates are made up from random gypsies they found crying on the streets of Rome. 2. The estimates are conservatively high. 3. The estimates are conservatively low.
Example Output: 2

Example Input: Statement: uh i don't like that i don't i think there should be individuality in dressing Choices:  1. There should be dress codes. 2. Identity should be expressed through clothes. 3. I don't think that it's appropriate to express individualism in your dress.
Example Output:
3