TASK DEFINITION: Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
PROBLEM: You cherry pick the parts of the Bible you like, and judge gays for doing the same.   I know many Christians who would call you a Jezebel for claiming to have authority over men.   That is fine with me, but your hypocrisy isn't.  And if you are going to flag people who state this simple fact we will flag you into oblivion as well...

SOLUTION: Yes

PROBLEM: And all the people living off the state and feds, they contribute nothing and just take. How is that fair to keep asking people who *do* work to pay more and more? A sales tax really is the fair way. Rural Alaskans need to quit whining too -- they don't contribute either but at the same time whine constantly about the cost to live in their villages when they are the ones that choose to live in a place where milk has to be flown in, and that's why it's $8 a gallon.

SOLUTION: No

PROBLEM: Excellent piece. People don't realize that it is ultimately the consumer who is pinched by these so-called business-only taxes; they are more or less pass-thru charges that hurt businesses (impairing their ability to compete with companies not exposed to the same taxes), workers (when costs of being in business go up, companies lay off workers), and consumers who pay higher prices for the same stuff as they did before.  Enough is enough. Perhaps the hostile tax environment may be part of the reason that the economy is so services oriented in Oregon. A lot of the Fortune 500 companies have left. The problem with such a services-oriented economy is that it is not very flexible. So, when economic downturns come around every 8 years, or so, the Oregon and other services-oriented economies (e.g. Arizona) is hit harder than the national average; a lot of the money used to pay for those services is sourced from discretionary income.  In recessions, people have less discretionary consumption.

SOLUTION:
No