In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Example Input: Comment: No, but when he called the Pharisees white sceplechurs doing things for show, he certainly was. You are taking their side. I am not endorsing sin, but I am saying it is not a device for social control that the reactionaries want it to be. By the way, the shame culture mostly going away in the Church is why so many stopped going to Mass. They no longer felt compelled by a necessitary to have a belief in the belief in God. Put another way, if you had a young person in your life who really did not believe in God, would you insist they go to Communion or even Mass (especially if they would do Communion if they attended)? The answer is they can stop going because they are Apostate and then, and pretty much only then, would their receiving be a sacralidge. Had they masturbated? Not so much.
Example Output: Sexual-explicit

Example Input: Comment: Right, a man who chooses to have sex with a women who has passed out is not responsible.  As a matter of fact, it should be a man's right.
what kind of person are you?
Yes drinking to excess is not good for anyone.  Sexual assault is a vicious crime.  
Are you suggesting this woman asked to be assaulted?  The cabbie assaulted her..she did nothing to deserve it. 
Surely even you know the difference.  If not, perhaps go to a rape crisis centre or buy a book...learning is quite powerful.
Example Output: Sexual-explicit

Example Input: Comment: As in the USA, most terrorism is from white, male citizens, not Islamic terrorists.
Example Output:
Non-sexual-explicit