In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

[Q]: Comment: Canada's ash my ass, its Alaska's ash!
[A]: Sexual-explicit


[Q]: Comment: Shouldn't complainant have been charged with sexually assaulting Sameer Kara? I mean he was passed out the whole time; she was on top of him trying to wake him up, she was fondling him as she was having intercourse with one cop and oral sex with the other. Kara was passed out drunk and could have gone to jail. Career and marriage probably ruined, and complainant gets away scott free? What is going on in the media? What is with this media sanctioned bullshit? Where are real journalists? (robyn doolitlle pfft.)
[A]: Sexual-explicit


[Q]: Comment: Well, I would disagree with that. Nazism and fascism always are bad. Anti-fascists are on the correct side of the debate. There really isn't an equivalence between the haters and the anti-haters. Let's stop pretending that the opposite of hate is as bad as hate.
[A]:
Non-sexual-explicit