In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

[EX Q]: Sentence: Fred and Alice had very warm down coats, but they were not enough for the cold in Alaska.
 Reason: The 'they' refers to coats because The coats have no perception of cold or how prepared they are. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
[EX A]: Wrong

[EX Q]: Sentence: Jane knocked on the door, and Susan answered it. She invited her to come out.
 Reason: The 'She' refers to jane because JANE REFER TO SUSAN. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
[EX A]: Wrong

[EX Q]: Sentence: Sam tried to paint a picture of shepherds with sheep, but they ended up looking more like golfers.
 Reason: The 'they' refers to the shepherds because dogs likely to the shepherds. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
[EX A]:
Wrong