In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: toxic and non-toxic. Toxicity is defiend as anything that is rude, disrespectful, or unreasonable that would make someone want to leave a converation.

Input: Consider Input: Comment: The registered mooring was designed and approved for the Phoenix.  It has been annually examined and maintained.  The place that the line severed was inside the mooring conduit, highly unusual.

Output: Non-toxic


Input: Consider Input: Comment: She'll resign in January.

Output: Non-toxic


Input: Consider Input: Comment: No: you inflated sense of yourself not withstanding, you didn't force me to do anything -- any more than I forced you to describe Trump as an a-hole. But you have caused me to change my mind about your claim that you are a lawyer. I think you probably are a lawyer. For you, winning an argument seems more important than telling the truth. For you, threading the needle between "liar" and "bullsh*tter" is more important than acknowledging that Trump's tweet was reckless and irresponsible; that he accused without supporting facts or evidence; that not caring whether something is true is the moral and functional equivalent of lying; that Trump has lied repeatedly in the weeks following the tweet.  You say that you think he's an a-hole; but that's easy and has no content. do you recognize him as reckless and incompetent? Or are you using a-hole as your shorthand for reckless, incompetent and dangerous?
A drunk clinging to his empty gin bottle: Agree?


Output: Toxic