Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.

[EX Q]: Who is Niel?  Also, irreverent?  Go to school to get smart.  Cheers!
[EX A]: No

[EX Q]: We are in agreement. But what does it matter if one is dealt with before the other, particularly since the campus policy effects thousands every day, staff, students, and visitors, while the capitol might see a few hundreds a year? The perfect is the enemy of the good, it is perfectly valid to remove restrictions one step at a time.

That is, after all, how we went from no legal carry in '93 to permitless in '04. One improvement at a time.
[EX A]: No

[EX Q]: Remember the pre oil days, when Alaskan's never cried about how great they had it. Non-Renewable resources, like a State Budget they can't figure out in Juneau either. Texans moving south, imagine that.
[EX A]:
Yes