Given a passage, construct a question on the basis of the information present in the passage. Construct the question in such a way that (i) it is unambiguous, (ii) it is answerable from the passage, (iii) its answer is unique (iv) it answer uses text phrases from the passage. Avoid creating questions that (i) can't be answered correctly without actually understanding the passage and (ii) uses the same words or phrases given in the passage.

Ex Input:
To analyze the functional connectivity patterns of the different EEG bands during wakefulness and sleep (different sleep stages and cyclic alternating pattern (CAP) conditions), using concepts derived from Graph Theory.', 'We evaluated spatial patterns of EEG band synchronization between all possible pairs of electrodes (19) placed over the scalp of 10 sleeping healthy young normal subjects using two graph theoretical measures: the clustering coefficient (Cp) and the characteristic path length (Lp). The measures were obtained during wakefulness and the different sleep stages/CAP conditions from the real EEG connectivity networks and randomized control (surrogate) networks (Cp-s and Lp-s).', 'We found values of Cp and Lp compatible with a small-world network organization in all sleep stages and for all EEG bands. All bands below 15Hz showed an increase of these features during sleep (and during CAP-A phases in particular), compared to wakefulness.

Ex Output:
Does the functional connectivity of different EEG bands move towards small-world network organization during sleep?


Ex Input:
To compare the efficacy and safety of prophylactic modalities for heterotopic ossification prevention after elbow and acetabular surgeries.', 'The retrospective chart review was conducted at the Aga Khan University Hospital and comprised record of patients who underwent open reduction and internal fixation for elbow and acetabular fractures between 2010 and 2013. Data was classified into three groups: Group A patients had received single dose of radiotherapy; Group B patients had received indomethacin, and Group C patients had not received any prophylaxis. Outcome variables included time-to-fracture healing, heterotopic ossification, non-union and wound infection.', 'Of the 104patients 70(67.3%) had elbow fractures and 34(32.7%) had acetabular fractures. Out of the 70patients with elbow fractures, 28(27%) were in Group A, 24(23%) in Group B, and 18(17%) in Group C. In Group A, 4(22%) patients had wound infection compared to 1(5.5%) patient in Group C (p=0.131). One (4%) patient in Group B and 1(5.5%) in Group C developed heterotopic ossification (p=0.486). Non-union occurred in 1(4%) patient in Group B and 1(5.5%) in Group C. Out of the 34 patients with acetabular fractures, 11(32.3%) were in Group A, 10(29.4%) in Group B, and 13(38.2%) in Group C. In Group A, 2(18.2%) patients developed wound infection. Only 1(7.6%) patient in Group C developed heterotopic ossification.

Ex Output:
Do prophylaxis against heterotopic ossification after elbow and acetabular fractures - Do we really need it?


Ex Input:
Ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease frequently cause epithelial damage in the intestine, leading to gut inflammation accompanied by areas of ulceration. The regeneration of damaged mucosa as well as the restoration of intestinal homeostasis involve induced and coordinated proliferation and migration of intestinal epithelial cells. Commensal bacterial colonization of the intestine is essential for normal intestinal development, renewal, and repair. N-formyl peptide receptors (FPRs) are widely expressed pattern recognition receptors that can specifically bind and induce responses to host-derived and bacterial peptides and small molecules during repair of mucosal injury in a redox dependent manner. However, little is known about the host-microbiota crosstalk mediated by FPRs during repair of gut mucosal injuries. Herein, purpose of this study is to exploit the mechanism of mucosal healing promoted by a consortium of gut microbiota that preferentially colonizes ulcerated mucosa undergoing resealing.", 'The regeneration of injured epithelial was studied using defined mechanical wounds inflicted in the mouse distal colon by employing a miniature endoscope and forceps. Microbiota studies were performed by high throughput sequencing of the V4 region of 16s rRNA gene of the bacteria harvested from mucosal wounds undergoing different stages of regenerative events.', 'The high throughput sequencing analysis of bacterial 16s rDNA determined rapid, reversible spatiotemporal alterations in the composition and diversity of microbiota in the wound microenvironment. Our data demonstrated that these ecological changes are dependent on FPR1/NOX2-mediated local tissue hypoxia, depletion of muc2 mucin, and compensatory effect of the over expression of HIF1-regulated MUC3 mucin. Our data show that these events of mucosal regeneration enrich a dominant member of this wound-associated consortium, Akkermansia muciniphila, which is associated with the pro-restitutive function. A. muciniphila, an anaerobic, mucinophilic commensal bacterium, enhanced proliferation and migration of enterocytes adjacent to the colonic wound beds in a process involving FPR1/NOX1 dependent redox signaling.

Ex Output:

Does o-012 The Intestinal Wound Regeneration modulate Mucosal Microenvironment to Stimulate Expansion of a Local Pro-restitutive Microbiota?