In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

[EX Q]: Comment: AMEN!
[EX A]: Non-obscene

[EX Q]: Comment: What else is to be expected when a non-leader with zero grasp is made chief?
This is just part of the fulfillment; preordained.
Onward it will go. Are we halfway yet? Hopefully, this debacle is a marker on the short, last leg to Trump's demise.
[EX A]: Non-obscene

[EX Q]: Comment: The author negates his own argument in his own article: "this disheartening incident is distinct from the acceptance, tolerance and understanding that my home province normally greets me with." 

So by his own admission, the typical interactions he has with his fellow citizens in NL is acceptance, tolerance and understanding. He has one "distinct" negative experience and he questions the civility and nature of Canada and Canadians at large...

I hate to pile-on here (especially with some the more vitriolic comments below) but this pathetic and sad and distracts from real issues of racism and discrimination.
[EX A]:
Non-obscene