Given a document, generate a short title of the document. The title should convey the main idea/event/topic about which the document is being written. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

Ex Input:
Roberto Azevedo  Director-General of the World Trade Organization (WTO)  attends the World Economic Forum (WEF) annual meeting in Davos  Switzerland January 24  2018. REUTERS/Denis Balibouse
“We must make every effort to avoid the fall of the first dominoes. There is still time ”  WTO Director General Roberto Azevedo  told the heads of WTO delegations at a closed-door meeting in Geneva.
“In light of recent announcements on trade policy measures  it is clear that we now see a much higher and real risk of triggering an escalation of trade barriers across the globe ”  Azevedo  said  according to a copy of  his  statement released by the WTO.
 Azevedo  is normally very conservative in remarks about WTO members’ trade policies  but  he  also plays a role as a guardian of the global trading rules  a bulwark against protectionism.
On Friday  he  broke  his  silence on Trump’s tariff plan  expressing concern and saying a trade war would be in nobody’s interest.
In  his  statement at Monday’s meeting   he  did not name any one country but sounded a more urgent warning.

Ex Output:
WTO chief urges states to stop first dominoes of trade war


Ex Input:
The Senate passed a sweeping bipartisan spending bill Friday morning  but not before the federal government shut down when Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) delayed the vote past midnight to complain about the budget deficit. It was the second government shutdown in less than three weeks.
Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) on Feb. 8 spoke on the Senate floor against a bipartisan budget deal and delayed a vote on the measure. (U.S. Senate)
Then  as an expected vote approached in the Senate   Paul  began to throw up roadblocks  demanding a vote on  his  amendment that would demonstrate how the two-year budget deal breaks past pledges to rein in federal spending.
GOP leaders refused to allow  him  to offer the amendment  arguing that if  Paul  got an amendment vote  many other senators might want one  too.  Paul   in turn  refused to allow the vote to go forward  making use of Senate rules that allow individual senators to slow down proceedings that require the consent of all.
“I can’t in all good honesty  in all good faith  just look the other way because my party is now complicit in the deficits ”  Paul  said on the Senate floor as evening pushed into night.
 Paul  objected after a visibly irritated McConnell tried to move to a vote. Then  Paul  launched into a lengthy floor speech deriding bipartisan complicity on deficit spending while the country goes “on and on and on  finding new wars to fight that make no sense.” The senator direly predicted a “day of reckoning ” possibly in the form of the collapse of the stock market.
As the hours ticked on   Paul  repeatedly refused to consent to allowing the vote to happen  as lawmakers and aides of both parties grew increasingly annoyed at  him . Sen. John Cornyn (R-Tex.)  leaving the floor after an unsuccessful attempt to curtail  Paul ’s standoff  called the gambit “grossly irresponsible” and said that leaders would not entertain  his  demand for a vote.
Senators of both parties were left fuming  with most of their ire directed toward  Paul .
“ He  has mastered the art of ticking off  his  colleagues ” said Sen. Christopher A. Coons (D-Del.).
“It’s a colossal waste of everybody’s time ” said Sen. John Thune (R-S.D.). Of  Paul   Thune said  “He never gets a result.”
 Paul himself  made no apologies as  he  delivered one floor speech after another  casting  himself  as a lone defender of fiscal austerity  despite having voted in December for a tax bill that added at least $1 trillion to the debt.

Ex Output:
Senate passes sweeping spending bill sends measure to House for crucial vote to end government shutdown


Ex Input:
The 63 lyrics in that book  first published in 1896  have a purity of speech and intensity of feeling that lent the collection the aura of a classic from the moment of its appearance. “You may read it in half-an-hour ” said one early reviewer of the book  “but there are things in it you will scarce forget in a lifetime.” What  Housman  writes about  almost without exception  is sorrow: lost love  nostalgia  mutability  grief  and death.  He  seems to understand everything about the pain of life  and the beauty of that pain—the way suffering itself can become a source of bittersweet pleasure.  He  is a poet who can’t listen to a blackbird sing without hearing a summons to the grave:
Yet as the English biographer and journalist Peter Parker shows in Housman Country  his new study of the poet’s work and legacy  “luckless lads” who came to  Housman  prepared to open their hearts were shocked by the wary  acerbic  pedantic man they encountered.  His  obituary in The Times of London described  him  as “so unapproachable as to diffuse a frost … [ He ] appeared of all men least tolerant of sentiment.” When the novelist E. M. Forster wrote to  Housman  expressing enthusiasm for  his  poetry   Housman  responded with a letter that Forster described as “absolutely hateful … I was so disappointed and hurt that I destroyed it after one rapid perusal.” Another writer was stunned  too. “Far from believing that man wrote [A] Shropshire Lad ” he said after meeting  Housman   “I shouldn’t even have thought  him  capable of reading it!”
To perceptive observers  however  the vast gulf between the poetry and the poet only added to  Housman ’s pathos. Clearly this was a man so sensitive to pain that  he  had to wear heavy emotional armor. Indeed  the poems themselves are often about the deflection of feeling by an ironic stoicism  which ends up highlighting the very emotion it is meant to conceal. What  readers from the beginning must have wondered  was the wound behind  Housman ’s bow? What made  him  so well acquainted with grief?
This was a matter for speculation and rumor during  Housman ’s lifetime ( the man  wasn’t about to give anything away)  but the answer has long since been established as a central part of  his  legend. In 1879  when  he  was 20 years old and a star student at Oxford   Housman  fell in love with a classmate  Moses Jackson—a hearty  athletic  and entirely straight man. In  his  distress that  his  romantic feelings were not reciprocated   Housman  ended up failing  his  final exams  to the shock of  his  teachers and family. Although  he  eventually did become a classical scholar   his  career was sidetracked for a decade by the fiasco.

Ex Output:

A. E. Housman Is a Poet for the Age of Brexit