We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Sent1: The death penalty should not be catagorized as a deterrent.
 Sent2: Therefore the argument of death as a deterent is a joke.
Similar

Sent1: In all cases, the first punishment shouldn't be the death penalty.
 Sent2: In any case, he didn't say that the penalty for sin is death, he said the penalty for one particular action which Adam couldn't even know was wrong, being unaware of good and evil, was death.
Not similar

Sent1: The thing is, without the death penalty there is absolutely no deterrent from committing heinous crimes.
 Sent2: Death penalty should be allowed as it deters people from committing serious crimes such as murder.

Similar