In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Input: Consider Input: Comment: It’s too bad that Mr. Trump doesn’t have the same international courage on climate change as he does criticizing a foreign mayor from his phone...on the golf course..
And it's too bad that Peyton Manning hangs out with a groper and racist demagogue...

Output: Non-obscene


Input: Consider Input: Comment: The question I have for BLM is: why aren't you hijacking and staging a sit-in at Toronto's Caribbean Festival Parade in August to highlight your message and agenda? It would seem like you would have a far more receptive and understanding audience there.
But no. BLM is blatantly using Pride because it is a bigger, broader, more popular and better-attended event. BLM absolutely does not care at all about the gay community; if so, they would be highlighting the homophobia and anti-gay violence in Caribbean and African counties, where gays have absolutely no rights at all.
The police absolutely must be allowed to march in next year's Pride parade. And BLM, by having violated the rules on parade participation on Sunday, must be banned.

Output: Non-obscene


Input: Consider Input: Comment: Over-reaction--this is getting nutz--no reason for all of this--part of the blame lies w/ the media fanning the flames of discontent--just wait till it hits locally and someone or group starts complaining about the King K stature or any likeness of Captain Cook--what about heiaus?  Are these going to be dismantled b/c of dislike for what they were used for????   Dont get nutz people--there are real threats to deal with like N. Korea and terrorists--


Output: Non-obscene