In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

[Q]: Comment: Researchers: It wasn't about free speech. Nobody came with rolls of duct tape to silence the other. The white supremacists came armed and ready to kick ass, not discuss.
[A]: Sexual-explicit


[Q]: Comment: Why such a light sentence? 90 days is all a sicko gets for raping and drugging children?
[A]: Sexual-explicit


[Q]: Comment: I think Glenn Oshiro's use of "pu##y" is a clear indication of satirical intent.  If its referent is not Trump's boastful locker room lie about grabbing women's genitalia in greeting, then what is it?  Puppy?

Your suggestion that I'm trying to "revisionist interpret" "cover" for misogyny is wide of the mark.  My intent is to ridicule Trump's boastful locker room lie about grabbing women's genitalia in greeting, which is what I think Glenn Oshiro was trying to do, as well.
[A]:
Sexual-explicit