Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.

[Q]: Well, to begin with this is an inspiring and very human story about the triumph of family, friendship and love. So the next time you use the word 'Billary' in your comments you might just want to think about that......
[A]: No


[Q]: For NY and CA to raise their minimum wages does the rest of the country a favor.  Business now concentrated in those states will move production and other functions to states suffering from lack of local opportunity.
[A]: No


[Q]: I agree with using PF earnings to fund some government. I couldn't tell but it seemed the author was in favor of the status quo. He also seemed to advocate spending cuts(which I support but likely won't happen), and an income tax. 

Problem is, that ain't gonna do it. It would be a miracle if there were $500 million in spending cuts. Or perhaps a $500 million whack in oil taxes and credits. A combination of Income tax and sales tax might be good for 300 or 400 million dollars. You still have to find 2.5 billion somewhere...or hope like heck for $120 pb oil.

That's why I made the stupid post on purpose. I wanted to show how much income tax that wage and income earners would have to pay in a hypothetical to eliminate the deficit as it stands now. Because the 6% of federal liability would only cover around 2.5% of it, or around $100 million

Failed reading comprehension? I'll admit it was a weak subject for me. But something needs to change in the status quo with the PF and PFD.
[A]:
Yes