We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gay Marriage) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gay marriage. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gay marriage.

Example Input: Consistent with the above, I think a legislator could make a rational decision to continue to exclude same-sex couple from marriage (which would be the question before the legislature, i.e., "should we change the status quo?")
Example Output: Valid

Example Input: The word marriage will not magically get them to be acceptance nor get them a chance at the happiness that everyone else takes for granted.
Example Output: Valid

Example Input: The federal DOMA was an effort to quarantine same-sex marriage, to exclude same-sex couples from federal rights and benefits even if states were to legalize same-sex marriage, which several have done since 1996.
Example Output:
Valid