Given a document and an entity the task is to select the author's sentiment towards the entity. Sentiments can be Positive, Neutral and Negative. Select Positive if the article expresses a positive view towards the given entity or praises its quality or skills. Select Neutral if the document expresses no clear view towards the entity or has equal amounts of positive and negative statements or expressing some fact/quote by someone else. Select Negative if the article expresses a negative view towards like harsh remarks, criticizing entities action/decision etc. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

Q: What is the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Michael Flynn Jr. ? Flynn  who is President Trump's former national security adviser  and his son Michael Flynn Jr.  were allegedly were involved in a plan to deliver Fethullah Gulen to the Turkish government  which views Gulen as a political enemy and has pressed the U.S. for  his  extradition  The Journal reported. In exchange   Flynn  and Flynn Jr. would be paid as much as $15 million.
 Flynn  â who was forced out of  his  White House job this year after revelations that  he  had misled officials about  his  conversations with the Russian ambassador â reportedly discussed the plan with Turkish government representatives last December. The meeting caught the attention of FBI  who have questioned at least four people about it.
 Flynn 's other associations with Turkey have drawn the interest of investigators  including $530 000 in earnings from a Dutch firm with ties to the Turkish government.
More:  Michael Flynn  faces legal peril in Washington. In  his  Rhode Island hometown   he 's revered.

A: Positive
****
Q: What is the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Trump Rachel Maddow ? Close video For all the hype  Nunes memo delivers sad trombone for  Trump  Rachel Maddow points out that despite two weeks of Fox News hype  the Nunes memo is not only underwhelming as a political stunt  it actually undermines the argument it was meant to make for  Donald Trump . share tweet email save Embed
It’s genuinely difficult to find an angle to the House Republicans’ “Nunes memo” that helps its intended beneficiary:  Donald Trump . Every key argument the president and  his  allies hoped to advance has fallen apart   and after weeks of over-the-top hype  Republicans are actually worse off than they were before the previously classified materials were released to the public.
5.  Trump ’s grammar  use of quotation marks  and capitalization of random words is bizarre for an American adult in a position of authority.
In early March   Trump  told the public that  he ’d “just found out” that former President Obama illegally tapped his phones at Trump Tower before the presidential election. “This is Nixon/Watergate ” the Republican said. “Bad (or sick) guy!”
As regular readers may recall  two weeks later  as it became clear that the confused president had relied on a nonsensical report from a right-wing website   Trump  nevertheless told reporters he felt “somewhat” vindicated about his conspiracy theory  thanks to support from House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes (R-Calif.).
 Trump   of course  hadn’t been vindicated. On the contrary  his entire conspiracy theory had been thoroughly discredited  and he accused his predecessor of a felony for no reason. But in the president’s mind  it was clear he’d been right from the start.
And nearly a year later  here we are again  watching  Trump  once again claim vindication  reality be damned.

A: Positive
****
Q: What is the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Waymo ? SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) - One of the most dramatic moments in an upcoming trade secrets trial between Alphabet Incâs Waymo and Uber will likely come when the former chief of Uberâs self-driving car unit takes the witness stand  as he is expected to repeatedly refuse to answer questions.
 Waymo  sued Uber Technologies Inc last year  claiming that  former Waymo engineer Anthony Levandowski  downloaded more than 14 000 confidential files before leaving to set up a self-driving truck company  called Otto  which Uber acquired soon after.
 Levandowski   regarded as a visionary in autonomous technology  is not a defendant in the case but is on  Waymo âs witness list.  Waymo  has accused Uber of benefiting from  Waymo  technology that  it  says Uber acquired through  Levandowski . Uber has denied Waymoâs allegations and has argued that the data in the files were not trade secrets.
During a pretrial deposition in April  Waymo lawyers questioned Levandowski for hours about allegations that he took Waymoâs trade secrets. He declined to answer any questions about his time at both companies  citing constitutional protections against self-incrimination over 300 times  according to a deposition transcript. Levandowski has never publicly addressed the allegations of taking the documents and law enforcement has not charged anyone with their theft.
Uber  Waymo and Miles Ehrlich  an attorney for Levandowski  declined to comment.
Elizabeth Rowe  a trade secret expert at the University of Florida Levin College of Law  said Levandowski refusing to answer questions on the stand  and the judgeâs instructions around it  would hurt Uberâs case because it would reinforce  Waymoâs  arguments that  he  was deceptive and took their information.
To counter  Levandowskiâs  expected refusal to answer questions  Rowe said Uber should tell jurors in opening statements that the companyâs actions and those of Levandowski are separate  stressing that Uber fired the engineer last May.
Alsup granted Waymoâs request for a pretrial injunction in May  prohibiting Levandowski from working on Lidar  a sensor technology for self-driving cars that is the crux of the current litigation.
If  Waymo  persuades a jury that Uber stole  its  trade secrets  it said it would seek a permanent injunction to prohibit Uber from using them in the future.
Other tech executives who could testify at trial include former Uber CEO Travis Kalanick  Benchmark venture capitalist Bill Gurley  and Waymo CEO John Krafcik  court documents showed.

A:
Neutral
****