In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Comment: He does not say that the Paris agreement says what you say it says - he says that the result of the agreement is that China goes on polluting until 2030 and that sucker nations , such as Canada, go on paying into the Global Environmental fund; but enjoy your ignorance whilst it lasts.
Non-sexual-explicit

Comment: You people who are still in the bed with Obama are complicit as well. Get your heads out of your asses and get on the Trump train... I guarantee the minute he is in office Trump will make it all go away! Obama is all about chaos, unrest, bias, racism, anarchy. It is the Saul Alinsky way as well as the brand of Soros.... smell the coffee bozo's!
Sexual-explicit

Comment: No Lee did not.   The WILL required a freeing of the slaves 5 years after the death of MR Custis and they were freed at that point.   Lee would have been in direct violation of his fiduciary responsibility as executor had he failed to carry out what was in the will.   That pesky rule of law bites leftists like yourself in the butt every time.

Sexual-explicit