In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: toxic and non-toxic. Toxicity is defiend as anything that is rude, disrespectful, or unreasonable that would make someone want to leave a converation.

[EX Q]: Comment: And he will continue to look like a complete IDIOT. That's ok, he's digging his own grave!
[EX A]: Toxic

[EX Q]: Comment: Mr Dan Sullivan warm welcome to the race.
[EX A]: Non-toxic

[EX Q]: Comment: Poloz is merely stating what has been implicit since Trump won in November.  Bank economists have missed this as the key threat in their statements expressing surprise and disappointment in the Bank of Canada continued dovish posture.

Additionally, I think his remarks about rates going up in 2018 were intended to warn real estate speculators in the GTA.

As for his being a disappointment from a business formation and capital expenditure perspective, I think he is not in the least complicit.  There are a host of political and structural reasons that business investment is slow and poor commodity prices have not helped.

I was not pleased when Poloz was selected, based on his style and track record at EDC, but he has done a very good job.
[EX A]:
Non-toxic