instruction:
In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.
question:
Comment: How do you shut Drudge down and not shut down all the bigoted, racist, sites he links to like the Washington post, New york times, ext... ;)
answer:
Non-sexual-explicit


question:
Comment: This topic must be expanded beyond "clergy sex abuse" to abuse of all kinds by clergy. There are priests who engage in patterns of verbal and emotional abuse which are just as damaging to the victims, and if the victims report the treatment, they are ridiculed, intimidated and manipulated to keep silent by those in authority over these abusers, who go merrily on their way, thinking, "As long as I'm not caught in bed with a woman, or a man, or looking at porn on a computer, nothing will happen." They behave like spoiled children, and those in authority enable and protect them.
answer:
Sexual-explicit


question:
Comment: "Those who support him very likely know him and are well suited to evaluate what he has and has not done."

Were you present while he was having sex with this MINOR? No? Then what are you talking about knowing him?

You're why less and less people belong to churches. You'd rather protect a criminal than a CHILD. It's sick.
answer:

Sexual-explicit