We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Q: Sent1: People constantly trumpet about how having a gun means that they can protect themselves, but first they must be able to fire the gun on another human being, something that most people find hard to do.
 Sent2: If people are going to carry guns for protection, they should be encouraged to put lots and lots of rounds through the gun.

A: Not similar
****
Q: Sent1: However, even though there were less deaths, there was a surge in gun crime, death and non-death related, after the ban on guns.
 Sent2: If guns are banned, there will obviously be less guns in circulation.

A: Not similar
****
Q: Sent1: The logic of less guns in law abiding citizens hands means less gun crime is clearly insane.
 Sent2: The opposite of "more guns = less crime is not true" is not "more guns = more crime".

A:
Not similar
****