We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

[Q]: Sent1: The death penalty has not been shown to be more effective than life imprisonment in deterring murder, hence we should choose life imprisonment.
 Sent2: Both the death penalty and a life sentence would have prevent further murders.
[A]: Similar


[Q]: Sent1: i think that life without opportunity of parole is the more humane and just punishment instead of the death penalty.
 Sent2: If convicts believe their innocence, appeals through life imprisonment is much more justifiable because it is easier to atone for a life imprisonment as opposed to death.
[A]: Not similar


[Q]: Sent1: The death penalty is not deterrance for the person executed.
 Sent2: As it is today, when someone murderers another, the death penalty is considered, as it should be.
[A]:
Not similar