In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Comment: We have Trump on audio/video tape bragging on "how he does it to women."  "When I see a beautiful woman, I can't wait."  I'm a star and I can do anything.  Women like it."  "I grab them by the p___y."  Pop in more tic tacs.
Sexual-explicit

Comment: It's equally ludicrous my friend.  I intended say there is more than one behavior that causes addiction and prescription drugs are every bit as likely to destroy families.   The city wants to chose their 'bad' behavior to tax.  It's not a fair tax it's a sin tax.  I ask again why chose marijuana users?
Non-sexual-explicit

Comment: I have already posted several times on the Russian purchase of yellowcake mineral right from a rancher in, I believe, Wyoming. Russia and the US have maintained mutual trade in uranium ores for decades. This was a propaganda win for Putin in Russia, but meaningless in context, and Uranium is still a strategic mineral whose trade is overseen by the State Department. Clinton initially approved sale of mineral rights to a Canadian consortium; after that, it was out of her hands. But as you know we buy nuclear triggers from Russia under treaty.

The Clinton Foundation is (or was) active in supporting medical aid to African nations. Their books are open. Feel free to wade through them. Like all other Clinton haters, your arse is sucking swamp water.

Sexual-explicit