We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Q: Sent1: i think the death penalty should be abolished because some people are sentenced to deathfor a crime they might have not committed.
 Sent2: Most people deranged enough to commit crimes worthy of the death penalty feel no remorse for what they have done.

A: Not similar
****
Q: Sent1: Therefore, people will think twice before they choose to commit a crime and also, the death penalty has been proven to deter the crime rate.
 Sent2: The death penalty has been found to be a more effective deterrent to crimes against children.

A: Similar
****
Q: Sent1: Perhaps the most important factor in determining whether a defendant will receive the death penalty is the quality of the representation he or she is provided.
 Sent2: And that killer has help, he has the people that support the death penalty and will give him more appeals, and if found guilty he'll get an easy way out with death, he won't have to suffer.

A:
Not similar
****