In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence can be inferred from the statement. Incorrect choices change the meaning in important ways or have details that are not mentioned in the statement. Indicate your answer as 1,2, or 3 corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.
--------
Question: Statement: Most of the tech executives are uninterested in politics (though Case is an exception). Choices:  1. Case is interested in politics. 2. Most tech executives stay out of politics. 3. Case doesn't care who wins this election.

Answer: 2


Question: Statement: but i'm at the uh Melpar division here in uh Falls Church Choices:  1. I am at the Melpar division in Falls Church. 2. I have always been a member of Falls Church. 3. I have never stepped foot near Falls Church.

Answer: 1


Question: Statement: My suggestion would be to drop the rules against conflicts of interest in favor of a simple one that says material biases should be disclosed. Choices:  1. The current rules against conflicts of interest are overly complicated, and there are too many loopholes. 2. I would suggest that we keep the current rules against conflicts of interests exactly the way they are. 3. My advice would be to implement a simple rule that people have to own up to their material biases.

Answer:
3