TASK DEFINITION: In this task, you're given a statement, and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence clearly disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3' corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.
PROBLEM: Statement: It is sufficient to note, however, that Stevenson was content to rely on a mix of his own admitted bloodthirstiness and good old-fashioned prejudice for his conclusion. Choices:  1. Stevenson relied on his thirst for blood and prejudice.  2. Stevenson was just and relied on the truth. 3. Stevenson will do anything to get ahead. 

SOLUTION: 2

PROBLEM: Statement: so under the circumstances Choices:  1. Given the circumstances.  2. So under the table.  3. Given the circumstances surrounding the election. 

SOLUTION: 2

PROBLEM: Statement: However, they noted that the current uses of IT in rulemaking are often pilot projects of limited scope, and suggested more widespread adoption of some of those innovations by federal agencies, or by the federal government as a whole. Choices:  1. There is sense of competition among agencies hindering with the federal work. 2. There have been lot of improvements in building bridges between the organizations. 3.  In future we will be seeing a wider adoption and communication between all the present federal agencies. 

SOLUTION:
1