Categorize the comment on the basis of severe toxicity. If the comment is severely toxic output Yes, otherwise output No.

Example Input: What happens if the State has a declared state of emergency and needs federal assistance? Will the governor not be allowed to accept the monies until the do nothing legislators approve it? 

Hawker is too dumb to see the big picture of anything. >_<
Example Output: No

Example Input: You would think the author of this post, or an editor at Willamette Week, would have been able to do a simple Google search and realized: 

1. There is already an article titled "Your Uber Driver Hates You," written in Sept. 2014: https://idrivesf.wordpress.com/2015/01/27/your-uber-driver-hates-you/

2. A Buzzfeed listicle titled "Ten Reasons Why Your Uber Driver Hates You" followed shortly after: http://www.buzzfeed.com/kellkontraire/ten-reasons-why-your-uber-driver-hates-you-xk61

3. To update the myriad reasons why your Uber driver hates you with one extra reason is just a lazy way to make your point. 

4. Also, lists are dumb.
Example Output: Yes

Example Input: i have no dog, or cat, in the TNR fight. 

i just find it amusing kicking racist homophonic religious zealots.
Example Output:
Yes