In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: insult and non-insult. Insult is any lanugage or act that is disrespectful or scornfully abusive.

[EX Q]: Comment: The Liberals were given a strong mandate? Are you on crack? 

The Conservatives have 99 seats, that hardly gives your party a "strong" mandate. And with your Captain Moonbeam and all of his broken promises I hope Her Majesty's Loyal Opposition continues to put the screws to them! You get over it and let Parliament on the Westminster system do it's job. The liberals whinning about proper procedure is pathetic.
[EX A]: Insult

[EX Q]: Comment: I wouldn't be caught dead, at a cockfight, in those dude duds, because duds they are.
[EX A]: Insult

[EX Q]: Comment: I speculate this sharper demarcation may illustrate tunnel vision and the Law of Unintended Consequences.  Old-school theory has it that a sharp demarcation is good because it minimizes stray light, delivering lumens right where the design engineer wants them and nowhere else.  So I can see why they'd strive for that.

But the engineer isn't an MD and hasn't a clue about the physiologic (and even psychologic) effects of these abrupt transitions. 

And alignment?  Nowadays it's nothing more than the red-haired stepchild to vehicle design fashions.  Function follows form, at a considerable distance.
[EX A]:
Non-insult