In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Example Input: Comment: Astonishing comments on this thread. The C series was a remarkable achievement for a mid sized country like Canada and showed the level of technological expertise in aerospace. Name me any other country in the world apart from the USA that has even come close to this achievement. Airbus is multi country and Embraer is revamping old technology. Why shouldn't Canada play an important role within Airbus?
There will be more jobs in Alabama if the US market opens up but the new company with all its strengths could sell twice as much in the rest of the world where 70% of the market is  bringing more jobs to Canada. If Trump is happy about this deal which considerably strengthens Boeing's only real competitor the he is the fool I always thought he was.
Example Output: Non-sexual-explicit

Example Input: Comment: We are doomed. Kiss my arse goodbye.
Example Output: Sexual-explicit

Example Input: Comment: I don't know if the bishops ever told priests that if they rape a child and celebrate Mass they are committing sacrilege.  But even if they didn't, the priest should know that...it is pretty basic Catholicism that receiving Communion with a mortal sin on your soul is sacrilege. 

By the logic of your second paragraph, there can never be a mortally sinful sexual act, since sex acts by definition occur in a state of passion.  Which begs the question, why in this case would the Scriptures go through the trouble of condemning sexual immorality? This sounds like something your example of a rapist priest could say to himself to justify himself taking Communion in a state of mortal sin.
Example Output:
Sexual-explicit