In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine the neutral choice based on your inference from the statement and your commonsense knowledge. The neutral choice is a sentence that neither agrees nor disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3', corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence. If sentence X agrees with sentence Y, one's correctness follows from the other one. If sentence X disagrees with sentence Y, they can not be correct at the same time.

Example Input: Statement: One wonders whether the dark and shadowy world of his photographs might have had some association in his mind with the ambivalence he felt toward the Jews he posed in such excruciating positions. Choices: 1. One wonders if his history of being a circus clown effected his photography. 2. One wonders if his history in photography effected his posing of Jews. 3. One wonders if his history of abusive behavior effected his posing of Jews.  
Example Output: 3

Example Input: Statement: The really interesting question is why the Cato Institute and other free-market conservatives should be willing to squander their intellectual credibility by associating their names with this sort of thing. Choices: 1. The Cato Institute is been applauded for associating their name with this. 2. Risking their intellectual credibility will really damage their business. 3. There is question as to why the Cato Institute would associate with this sort of thing.
Example Output: 2

Example Input: Statement: The state Public Defender's office - where new lawyers make $43,536 a year - also continues to attract good candidates, said Frances Smylie Brown, chief deputy. Choices: 1. New lawyers make over $40,000 a year. 2. New lawyers will definitely be making at least six-figures a year. 3. The new lawyers tend to be responsible and invest their money.
Example Output:
3