In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

Input: Consider Input: Comment: Women should go back to the kitchen.

Output: Identity-attack


Input: Consider Input: Comment: Peter: The reason why it's difficult to take deal with issues raised in the letter is that the writer is largely dealing in hyperbole and bromides.  

Here's an example: "Trump’s tax cuts would increase investment, boost productivity and wages and increase innovation and opportunities for all Americans." That's silly. Tax cuts for the super-wealthy don't result in any of those things (or if they do the effect is neglible). The Bush tax cuts sure didn't result in that stuff. 

Most of the other statement are similar. Just a whole bucket of simplistic statements with little regard for the complexity of any of these issues.

Output: Non-identity-attack


Input: Consider Input: Comment: Apparently  the emails state he buys meth from gay Islamic party boys, who are transphobic, hate blacks, puppies, and illegally voted for Hillary !!!


Output: Identity-attack