Categorize the comment on the basis of obscenity. If the comment is obscene output Yes, otherwise output No.

[EX Q]: What BS!!  If there are crimes involved, get on with the trial.  There will eventually be civil lawsuits, so get on with them asap.  The people who had damage to their properties are already getting screwed by the borough as far as valuations (and therefore, taxes) are concerned.  Now it appears as if the State is going to mess with these people, too, by lessening the crimes and punishments these irresponsible idiots committed.  Disgusting!  So much for the State watching out for innocent citizens!
[EX A]: Yes

[EX Q]: You mean spend, spend, spend like the Republican majority has been doing for the past thirty-something years; and then turn around and pass the overspending into taxes at the municipal level?  Now rational voters aren't buy that it's the liberals spending and taxing that's got our state into fiscal trouble.  Try again, Ridgefield.
[EX A]: No

[EX Q]: Senator, what fools do you perceive us to be? Not one word in your writing about oil, the real cause of our financial woe. You sir, are arrogant, devoid of principles, corrupted by greed, shameless, and nothing more than a paid shill for your employer Conoco. Your employer is part of a cabal to steal Alaska's resources and get hit men  like you to vote to  pay for the theft from the state's treasury on the backs of good Alaskans including children, widows and seniors. It is time for you and your accomplices to go, whether by indictment, failure at reelection, or recall. You insult the intelligence of the readers of this newspaper by trying to pass blame on the few honest legislators standing in the way of the cabal.  The rape of Alaska is nearly a done deal, thanks to you and your ilk, Senator. It must be difficult for you each day to pick which hat to wear, a Conoco employee cowboy hat, Senator's beanie, or "Corrupt Bastards" ball cap.
[EX A]:
Yes