In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

[EX Q]: Comment: The clown is innocent until proven guilty.  But special counselor Mueller is going to pop the lying pu**y grabber, lol
[EX A]: Obscene

[EX Q]: Comment: I know, right, she is such a bad person for what she has done.
[EX A]: Non-obscene

[EX Q]: Comment: I didn't assume anything. In your own words you advocate against having legal protections from discrimination. The obvious result of such being that discrimination will increase. Therefore, you support discrimination, regardless of your silly claim to the contrary. You just try to hide your desire for discrimination behind your claim of ideological purity about freedom, except you are advocating for freedom to discriminate and diminish the freedoms of others, and you can't hide that.

And here you call enforcing laws against discrimination as "persecution", and you make the tired fallacy that those who advocate tolerance and equal acceptance are the intolerant ones because they won't tolerate intolerance. Sorry bro, but your opposition to the great founding principles of this country is obvious.
[EX A]:
Non-obscene