In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

[EX Q]: Comment: Trid sees nothing wrong with "No Dogs or Jews", "We don't serve Muslims" and so on. He supports bigotry. And no, that is NOT a straw man, but the clear and obvious implication of your " If either the buyer or the seller does not want to enter into that contract for whatever reason then I believe they have the right to refuse." Thank you for proving that your claim to being a Christian is a complete sham.
[EX A]: Non-sexual-explicit

[EX Q]: Comment: Putin doesn't want to weaken Europe, he wants to make deals with them and empower them as much as anyone. What he does want to do is cut the strings of their master puppeteer  and liberate them from subservience of their American controllers. This bill is not going over too well in Europe and particularly in Germany where energy pipelines are being built from Russia to provide energy security to Europe and Germans.. The Americans are dreaming if they think they will replace this source  with their expensive energy supplies. Don't be too smug the fallout will come back to America to bite them you know where sooner than you think.
[EX A]: Non-sexual-explicit

[EX Q]: Comment: Wrong, Marty E, VERY wrong!  And you should be in full agreement with 1LittleBear, who is correct in these matters.  So, the bottom line here is for you to stop spreading the theological equivalent of FAKE NEWS!
[EX A]:
Non-sexual-explicit