The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the elicit-pref strategy, otherwise output No. elicit-pref is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used to discover the preference order of the opponent in the negotiation.

[EX Q]: Context: 'I see. I wouldn't want you to go hungry. ☹️' 'thank you for that.' 'I'm glad we seem to have come to an agreement. This camping trip is going to be fun!'
Utterance: 'I'm so excited! So just to be clear: you get 1 food, 2 firewood, 3 water'
[EX A]: No

[EX Q]: Context: 'Yes, same here! I'm glad that we all have our own basic necessities, but extra is always wonderful. 🙂 What are you most interested in?' 'I am most interested in water! My husband and I are traveling with our newborn and we need as much water as possible!🙂' 'Ah, I see! I am in the same boat. We are camping somewhere where there is no source of water and it's very hot. Hm, let's see how to go about this'
Utterance: 'what else is a priority for you?'
[EX A]: Yes

[EX Q]: Context: 'How about you take 1 firewood, I''l take 2 and with food, you can have 2 and I'll take one package.  I have two very hungry boys!' 'Is there a reason you want the 2:1 split? Food my group's largest priority by a large margin (We eat a lot). It's worth a lot more to my group then the firewood would be.' 'That's why I would like to give you 2 and I will take 1 food.  I have 8 and 10 year old boys.🙂'
Utterance: 'I'm interested in hearing more about why you want a 2/1 split: Is the food worth more to you than the third firewood? If so, I'm happy to do that split, but I'd like 3 water in return.'
[EX A]:
Yes