In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

[Q]: Comment: These next few months are going to be very entertaining, that previous big bag of popcorn from Costco may have to be replenished. It's a given that Trump will throw anyone and everyone under the bus to save his own ass. The big question is, how many of his little band of crooks will turn on him to save their own collective asses?
[A]: Sexual-explicit


[Q]: Comment: You know nothing about vegans or vegetarians, then you go and lump them into the SAME category as "food fetishists"!  Like those young men in the Book of Daniel, yes?
[A]: Non-sexual-explicit


[Q]: Comment: I believe, actually know, that isn't true, Wyatt. So I'd like you to cite to those "all studies ever carried out" since you are making the claim. And note, you can't, with methodological accuracy or intellectual honesty, conflate studies on police disarms with those of private citizens, as the circumstances of their contact with violent perpetrators are distinctly different.
[A]:
Non-sexual-explicit