Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.

[Q]: Et tu' brute?
[A]: No


[Q]: Actually, McBeath retired (see "emeritus" in the story).  As it appears most folks who aren't Democratic insiders have long since forgotten about Scott McAdams, let me remind you that he was claiming to be "poor" when he and his wife were making around $150,000/year combined.  Oh, I know, "it's expensive to live in Sitka" yada yada...
[A]: No


[Q]: Larson should be charged with shooting this poor criminal... Charged for having poor aim that is. He would have done infinitely better had he shot him in the face. Now this guy will bail out next week and be back to robbing / stealing to shoot junk in his arm. Best case scenario, he'll cost thousands in public funding to get 'treatment'.
[A]:
Yes