Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.

Input: Consider Input: Oh, for pete's sake.  Mr. Dunleavy's insistence that the less kids know about all aspects of sex is ridiculous. The fact that he insists on throwing up barriers in an attempt to block thorough sexual education is quite annoying, if not suspect.

Output: Yes


Input: Consider Input: I have learned a lot from this
Everybody suddenly is an expert on where lot lines are, whereas the day before they were not
Everybody must have been there because we have several thousand first hand accounts with expert dog behavior testimony
Everybody"s dog is perfect and never known to be aggressive even though police reports show otherwise
The shooter should receive death threats on facebook from internet tough guys who would never confront anybody in person
Obviously the shooter parked" in the dog owners yard" when was the last time somebody drove up in front of your house and pulled up on the grass?apparently these psychic witnesses saw all this
Labs are never aggressive!!  Guess what clueless dog owners. Dogs behave incredibly different absent owners. Get over it. 
All these silly comments convince me you dog experts are anything but that

Output: Yes


Input: Consider Input: This mistake by Stewart goes to poor judgement and more attention to style than substance.  His speech made a valid point about helping people in appropriate ways where they live, but he just couldn't resist repeating the story about fires and disappearing pets (perhaps not even true).  I agree that Stewart is not qualified for any higher office, and possibly would not even be in the public eye if he were not part of one of the powerful families in the area.


Output: No