We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

[EX Q]: Sent1: Is your point that citizens should be allowed to have guns to defend themselves from the government or that citizens should be allowed to have guns to protect themselves from other citizens?
 Sent2: Gun hater pilot logic is for companies and governments to deny a person the right to bears arms to defend ones self then not be held responsible when these companies and governments fail to protect the unarmed citizens!
[EX A]: Not similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: The whole reason why the Second Amendment exists is so that the people could defend themselves against the tyranny of their own government.
 Sent2: The Second Amendment, the right to be armed for all legal and lawful reasons, is finally recognized as not just a fundamental right, but an individual right held by the people, not any state or government.
[EX A]: Not similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: Now when you rightfully talk about how the 2nd amendment grants me the right to own a gun people won't take you seriously because you think the 2nd amendment cannot be repealed.
 Sent2: What the Court is saying, at least to me, is that if you can prove the firearm you have has some usefulness for militia service then the 2nd.
[EX A]:
Not similar