In this task you need to give reasons to justify the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a question about how to justify the coreference between a noun phrase and the target pronoun. Good practices involve the discussion about how the descriptions attached to the targeted pronoun relate to the noun phrase candidate in the question. The reasoning could come from one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. Write the sentence in natural language.

Q: Sentence: The sun was covered by a thick cloud all morning, but luckily, by the time the picnic started, it was out.
 Question: Why does the 'it' refer to the sun?

A: Because the sun is the thing being covered, so "it" is out when it is no longer covered. The cloud can't cover itself.
****
Q: Sentence: I put the butterfly wing on the table and it broke.
 Question: Why does the 'it' refer to the butterfly wing?

A: Because A butterfly wing would likely not be heavy enough to break a table.
****
Q: Sentence: Bob was playing cards with Adam and was way ahead. If Adam hadn't had a sudden run of good luck, he would have lost.
 Question: Why does the 'he' refer to adam?

A:
Because Adam was losing at first making it likely that he ws the one with the sudden run of good luck.
****