In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

[EX Q]: Comment: another Thurstonian:  Listen Bub,  we're not talking about "chasing one unicorn"  we're talking about chasing THREE MILLION unicorns.....and they're "out there"...they're in plain sight.  you damn liberals like Paul Ryan just can't see them because you don't WANT TO see them.  I can see them and they're HUGE!!! not only that, but those illegals rode them to the polling places on November 8th.......you didn't see that either did you!!!! what's wrong with you People!!  How can you help "MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN" if you can't see three million illegals riding unicorns to the voting sites.....
[EX A]: Non-sexual-explicit

[EX Q]: Comment: Foreigners are buying property everywhere.  It should be a condition of any Asians coming to Canada that they agree to live in underground tunnels that we bore for them.  Living in a tunnel is still way better than living in China.
[EX A]: Non-sexual-explicit

[EX Q]: Comment: Good for China. Since they have done all of these things I guess they can stop being considered a "developing" country. They are far more developed than we were when we decided to call ourselves "developed".

This means that any agreement such as the Paris Accord that treats China as a developing nation still are complete garbage and should be renegotiated.
[EX A]:
Non-sexual-explicit