instruction:
In this task, you will be shown a sentence, and you should determine whether it is overruling or non-overruling. In law, an overruling sentence is a statement that nullifies a previous case decision as a precedent by a constitutionally valid statute or a decision by the same or higher ranking court which establishes a different rule on the point of law involved. Classify your answers into overruling or non-overruling
question:
the rationale behind the principle that a ""defendant may not receive a harsher sentence solely, or even partially, because he refuses to plead guilty and proceeds to require the prosecution to prove his guilt"" ""is that the coercion or inducement casts a chill over the exercise of guaranteed fundamental constitutional rights.""
answer:
non-overruling


question:
we disapprove of miller v. miller, 848 s.w.2d 344 (tex.app.  texarkana 1993, no writ), el paso sharky's billiard parlor, inc. v. amparan, 831 s.w.2d 3 (tex.app.  el paso 1992, writ denied), and any other authorities in which the court of appeals has dismissed an appeal when the appellant has made a bona fide attempt to invoke the appellate court's jurisdiction by filing a bond within the fifteen days of the date the bond was due.
answer:
overruling


question:
we disapprove cristich v. allen engineering, inc., 458 so.2d 76 (fla. 5th dca 1984), to the extent it conflicts with the present opinion.
answer:

overruling