Given a paragraph about cooking, and a set of conversational questions and answers about the paragraph, say whether the passage contains sufficient information to answer the follow-up question. Say Yes if it is answerable; otherwise, say No. The paragraph has the prefix 'CONTEXT:'. Each conversation question has a prefix `Q:` followed by the answer prefix `A:`, and the follow-up question has a prefix `FOLLOWUP_Q:`.

[EX Q]: CONTEXT: As Sobachatina said, it's cooked like many grains, and behaves very similar to rice. You could try continuing the steaming method, and if it does not get done by the time all the water has turned to steam, start it with a bit more water. Sobachatina's suggestion of a tight lid is also worth considering, but pay attention to the pot then, so you don't get it boiling over. An alternative is to use a boiling method. With or without toasting it first, add 3.5 parts of water to 1 part quinoa. Cook until soft, and put through a sieve to discard the superfluous water. The upside is that, unless you are using too high a temperature, there is no way to burn it.  <sep>  Q: How do I make fluffy(not crunchy) quinoa? A: You could try continuing the steaming method  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: How long should I let it steam?
[EX A]: No

[EX Q]: CONTEXT: It may be that your oven is not up to temperature before your first batch goes in. If it's not hot enough your cookies will have more time to melt and flatten before they cook. Try giving the oven 10 more minute preheating time before putting your first batch in.  <sep>  Q: Why is my first batch of cookies out of the oven too flat? A: It may be that your oven is not up to temperature before your first batch goes in  Q: The next batches are as expected, what would be the reason the first batch is not good? A: your oven is not up to temperature  Q: Why are my cookies thin and flat? A: If it's not hot enough your cookies will have more time to melt and flatten before they cook  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Do you have a good cookie recipe?
[EX A]: No

[EX Q]: CONTEXT: The term is not really defined that way. In the strict sense, it only has meaning for lean doughs - made of only flour, water, yeast and salt, eventually preferments or later mixins like seeds. You can extend it to enriched doughs (those that have fat, milk, eggs, tomato juice, etc.) but then it is no longer sharply defined. Calculating the exact content of water (e.g. adding to the calculation 17 g of water for every 100 g of butter) are pretty useless, because the water bound in an emulsion or other kind of colloid doesn't behave the same way as free water when making a dough. So, a dough with 100 g water and 100 g butter will be extremely different from a dough with 117 g of water, and still pretty different from one with 117 g of water and 83 g of oil. So, there is no real formula any more to create an actual percentage. The concept still stays somewhat useful in this case, but you have to "play it by ear". When you are trying to judge how soft a given enriched dough will be, you can start by calculating all the liquid and fat ingredients as if they were "hydration", which gives you a rough guide to compare it to other doughs, and then you have to make it and gain a tactile understanding of how it actually behaves.  <sep>  Q: What counts as "hydration" when figuring Dough Hydration? A: The term is not really defined that way. In the strict sense, it only has meaning for lean doughs  Q: So it won't work for an enriched dough? A: You can extend it to enriched doughs (those that have fat, milk, eggs, tomato juice, etc.) but then it is no longer sharply defined  Q: Would sour cream count as a liquid? A: you can start by calculating all the liquid and fat ingredients as if they were "hydration  Q: Would eggs count as hydration? A: You can extend it to enriched doughs (those that have fat, milk, eggs, tomato juice, etc  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: How do you tell if the dough is hydrated enough?
[EX A]:
Yes