The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the no-need strategy, otherwise output No. no-need is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used when a participant points out that they do not need an item based on personal context such as suggesting that they have ample water to spare. no-need can directly benefit the opponent since it implies that the item is up for grabs.

Example Input: Context: 'hi ' 'hello'
Utterance: 'i need a lot of packages from you'
Example Output: No

Example Input: Context: 'yeah. going good.' 'good to hear' 'How about the deal? '
Utterance: 'Sure. My kids are really looking forward to this camping trip but one has special needs and he has to have a specific diet. I am fairly flexible on the water and firewood but food is a must have for me.'
Example Output: Yes

Example Input: Context: 'I need 3 food packages as it is required to feed children who visited unexpectedly. Instead you can take water and firewood' 'No that doesn't work for me. I also have children with me. 4 children in total.  how about i take 2 food packages and 2 water packages and you take 1 food 1 water and 3 firewood packages.' 'I too have the same issue. I am also asking for children only , better you could accept 1 food , 2 water and 3 firewood, I hope this deal will work out for you'
Utterance: 'I need at least 2 food packages and at least 1 water. I can live with out any extra firewood.'
Example Output:
Yes