We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Q: If I had my way, we'd have no death penalty except for rare cases, and have time in prison be cruel and usual with regular torture.

A: Valid
****
Q: This process is needed in order to ensure that innocent men and woman are not executed for crimes they did not commit, and even with these protections the risk of executing an innocent person can not be completely eliminated."

A: Valid
****
Q: How do you compare killing a little child who has never had the chance to live to the execution of a criminal who has been raping and killing little children?

A:
Valid
****