Categorize the comment on the basis of toxicity. If the comment is toxic (harmful, malicious, derogatory, threat, insult, identity attck, etc.) output Yes, otherwise output No.

Input: Consider Input: It was more than that Paul.  Vinis repeatedly attacked Clark's record.   And he did not offer any vigorous defense.   Nor did he go on the offensive and attack any of the numerous vulnerabilities that Vinis had.   Apparently he thought he could win this election being a gentleman, and refraining from criticizing Vinis.

However, elections don't work that way.   Attack campaigns do work!   That is why politicians use them so much.

Output: No


Input: Consider Input: The ignorance and hatred on this thread is appalling. Liberals never bother to check anything out. They think they know it all. All they do is insult and call those that disagree with childish names. They have no tolerance for anyone with an opposing views. They would gladly vote for a candidate that had had over 3 decades of well documented corruption and scandals. They are ignorant and proud of it.

Output: Yes


Input: Consider Input: What is 6 and 1 ?


Output: No