We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

Input: Consider Input: If a criminal steals a legally purchased gun from a law abiding gun owner, we are still faced with a situation where the criminal's actions and intent are to blame, not the gun itself.

Output: Valid


Input: Consider Input: Is this your logic in denying airline passengers the right to defend themselves?

Output: Valid


Input: Consider Input: A lot of the most popular laws (unconstitutional in my estimation from many court cases) were examined by the CDC and NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCE and found no benefit IN ANY OF THE CURRENT ILLEGAL GUN REGULATION/BAN LAWS.


Output: Valid