We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Ex Input:
Sent1: Some innocent people are still sentenced to death, and that's where I see a problem.
 Sent2: I would support the death penalty IF there was a way to ensure that it would not put innocent people to death.

Ex Output:
Similar


Ex Input:
Sent1: So if we can assume that innocent people are convicted in capital punishment cases, shouldn't we be free to assume that innocent people are being convicted in non-capital punishment cases as well?
 Sent2: Many, many people have already been exonerated AFTER being convicted of a capital crime.

Ex Output:
Not similar


Ex Input:
Sent1: Like I said I would just want them to actually have to deal with the consequences and not get an easy out, which is what executing them does.
 Sent2: I suppose you could say "well it keeps them from harming society" but so does the death penalty.

Ex Output:

Not similar