You are given first 5 messages from a series of message exchanges between 2 persons playing the game of Diplomacy which is an American strategic board game. You need to generate the next message. The message should be generated such that it fits the context seen so far. Avoid the text that is (i) tangent to the context, (ii) repeats the context.

[EX Q]: ['Hallo there my dearest Tsar! Still figuring this messaging system out haha', "France, what's up my friend?  Do I have anything to worry about from my neighbors?  Would you tell me if I did?", "Of course I would, and I haven't heard anything yet. I may have heard some plan involving taking out England early? Unsure 😉", 'I suppose you really wanted to be in burgundy! What’s next? Would you like assistance?', 'Assistance would be nice, depends what form it comes in though 😄']
[EX A]: Nicely done.  Do you plan on helping England against Germany?  If you'd like, the three of us could take down Germany together, and then you and I team up on England.  What are your thoughts on this general strategy?  If you agree, we can figure out the specific tactics as we go along.

[EX Q]: ["Good morning, France.\n\nI wanted to reach out to you to see where your mind is at initially.  I also wanted to let you know up front that, unless something changes, I will be moving to Ruhr.  I'm not worrying about Belgium at this point, but I do want to ensure that I have Holland locked down.  Most importantly, this isn't intended as hostility towards you.\n\nWith that out of the way, what's going on so far?  Have you heard from Italy, England, or Russia?  What are you hoping for early?", "Checking back in with one more question: would you prefer to plan a stand-off in Burgundy?  I'm not excited about it, but I'm open to it.", "Hi Germany! \n\nBounce in Burgundy sounds good. But your move to Ruh... idk, not really liking that. Holland is guaranteed to you winter 1901 no matter if you have Ruh or not. The main reason you would move it there in 1901 would be to take Belgium, and then move in on me. It feels pretty anti-france. Hopefully we can work something out, and maybe even arrange an alliance against England? About that, have you heard anything from them? I havn't. \n\nLooking forwards to a good game! -France", "Yes, England reached out to me, and asked if I was interested in an alliance of the three of us.  I told him I wasn't, as that rarely ends well for Germany.  I told him I was definitely interested in allying with one of you, but not both.\n\nI'm not a big fan of a bounce in Burgundy.  It's kind of a fear maneuver that puts both of us behind overall.  It's nice on your end, since it functions as your defense and frees up Marsailles.\n\nSpeaking of Marsailles - nothing from Italy?  I haven't heard from him yet.", 'What would the rest of S01 look like with the Burgundy bounce?']
[EX A]: So... what are you going to do about ruhr? The rest of S01 really depends on where we want this to go. Do you want a full on alliance against england or just an agreement of DMZs and who gets what territories.

[EX Q]: ['Greetings, Germany. How are things up north?', 'Things are still shaking out but overall ok. France and England seem to be getting along nicely and will likely roll towards us soon.', 'France told me his main focus is to take out England before moving towards us, but that seems unlikely. Let’s watch out for each other', '👍🏽', 'England didn’t seem to be making any friends fast. Turkey looks like they’ve sided with Russia against Austria. Are you jumping on the anti Austria bandwagon? I’m trying to fend off Russia in the north.']
[EX A]:
Huh, France has been pretty quiet to me, so I was assuming France and England were working together. Have you heard much from France? I probably will try to stay neutral with Austria a bit longer, we will see