In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

[Q]: Comment: In the US system, the president has the authority to fill over 4700 positions.  As a president who campaigned on the GOP ticket and as a conservative, he will appoint a considerable number of conservatives.  But unlike here where the PM is constrained by having to choose from a small number of MPs and having to give consideration to racial and regional representations and now, stupidly, having to also choose 50% women and 50% men, the US president can actually choose from the best qualified people to fill specific cabinet - and other -roles regardless of their ideology.   

On Sunday, in front of millions of viewers of 60 Minutes, the Trump children were asked if they would serve in their father's administration.  They all said no, they would concentrate on running the Trump business empire.   

Sorry if conservative appointments offend you and Judith M. so but this is what voters in THE ELECTION (as opposed to the liberal mob rule in the streets) voted for.   

Remain calm.
[A]: Non-sexual-explicit


[Q]: Comment: You see that Chimp -- you just can't help - try as you might - to L-L-L-L- LABEL!!!  Everybody do the Label-Label - it's the newest Craze!  So you label my comment a "rant." A rant? Rant?? Your response to my 'rant' is longer than my 'rant.' I think I have a label for that around here somewhere. Oh yes, here it is, my 'hypocrisy' label. Thanks for the slap. Are you happy?
[A]: Non-sexual-explicit


[Q]: Comment: The state tossing money into another pocket on the same pair of pants.  Be interesting to know how much native Hawaiian funds OHA has spent on non-Hawaiian programs and initiatives.
[A]:
Non-sexual-explicit