We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.
--------
Question: The 2nd Amendment does NOT provide an individual the Right to own gun(s) for the PURPOSE OF providing for: food, self-defense, target practice, a hobby as a collector, or fun.

Answer: Valid


Question: This is just further proof that gun control does not equal crime control and there are no "reasonable" nor "responsible" gun control laws.

Answer: Valid


Question: Previous 9th Circuit rulings, stating that the Second Amendment was purely a tool of government to maintain the National Guard rather than guaranteeing the right of the individual to be armed, were never taken up by the SCOTUS.

Answer:
Valid