Given a paragraph about movies and a set of conversational questions and answers about the paragraph, say whether the passage contains sufficient information to answer the follow-up question. Say Yes if it is answerable; otherwise, say No. The paragraph has the prefix 'CONTEXT:'. Each conversation question has a prefix `Q:` followed by the answer prefix `A:`, and the follow-up question has a prefix `FOLLOWUP_Q:`.

Ex Input:
CONTEXT: For a while now Scream Factory (Shout Factory) has had distribution rights for Phantasm 2. Anchor Bay had the rights for 1,3, and 4 but the DVDs are out of print and AB didn't seem to do much with the movies beyond their initial DVD releases. Anchor Bay no longer holds the distribution rights; I have no idea who does. If Scream Factory ends up with the films that would be cause for celebration as they make an art out of re-releasing old horror films on Blu ray and making some fine collector sets...unfortunately all of my online searching hasn't turned up any info on who does hold the rights to the films. Fingers Crossed.  <sep>  Q: Why is Phantasm II available on Bluray while the other movies in this series are not? A: Anchor Bay had the rights for 1,3, and 4 but the DVDs are out of print and AB didn't seem to do much with the movies beyond their initial DVD releases  Q: Is that a different company than phantasm II A: For a while now Scream Factory (Shout Factory) has had distribution rights for Phantasm 2  Q: Why are they owned by different companies? A: If Scream Factory ends up with the films that would be cause for celebration as they make an art out of re-releasing old horror films on Blu ray and making some fine collector sets  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: How many are in the series?

Ex Output:
No


Ex Input:
CONTEXT: I haven't seen the film so I don't really know the context for the scene: But it sounds like he's talking about how uncomfortable dating is and how awkward sex can be. As a woman with long hair, it hurts a lot when someone pulls your hair and, when in the bedroom, it will happen occasionally, which takes a lot of the fun out of it... assuming it's not intentional... A guy can easily trap the girl's hair between his body and the mattress, preventing the girl from moving her head and yanking the hair if she's not aware it's trapped, causing pain.  <sep>  Q: What does you're on my hair signifies in Wedding Crashers? A: A guy can easily trap the girl's hair between his body and the mattress, preventing the girl from moving her head and yanking the hair  Q: It means stop touching my hair. Do you have anything else to tell me? A: As a woman with long hair, it hurts a lot when someone pulls your hair and, when in the bedroom, i  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Why not just put it in pigtails?

Ex Output:
No


Ex Input:
CONTEXT: I think that 90 seconds is just the amount of time it takes to take out the tracker. The reason they wanted to remove the tracker was to implant their own tracker into Lane. Lane, should he have gotten free, would've removed the tracker himself but now if he were to be freed he wouldn't know that he still had a tracker on him. This new tracker having been put in place by the IMF and not the Parisian authorities that were holding Lane and trying to get him back from Hunt's team making not only Lane but Walker not realizing that Lane was still being tracked. I also believe they did this in order to set Lane's tracker as visible again and when they set the drone away with Lane's tracker to keep the authorities on a goose chase thinking that Lane was still on the move while Hunt's team escaped with Lane. When they finally set the drone free you can hear helicopters passing by overhead. They drew the authorities closer to the tracker and then set it free instead of them trying to follow them to the sewers.  <sep>  Q: Why did Hunt's team set a 90 seconds limit to take out the tracker from Lane's neck? A: I think that 90 seconds is just the amount of time it takes to take out the tracker  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Why did they want to remove the tracker?

Ex Output:

Yes