The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.

[EX Q]: Context: 'They sort of need more water for their meds' 'I'm sorry to hear that! But can you spare 1 for me since you probably don't need all the water.' 'Sure that sounds fair. Thank you. Besides water what do you need for your trip?'
Utterance: 'great. Then can you give 2 food instead? We eat a lot and need more to go through the night...'
[EX A]: Yes

[EX Q]: Context: 'Yes please ..! My son has respiratory problems I'll definitely need that 😡😡😡' 'If you really need water, then can I have 2 firewood and 3 food then?' 'No I really need food also ...at least I will take 3 food and 2 water and you can take remaining'
Utterance: 'I'll let you take 3 food and 1 water, and I will take the rest.'
[EX A]: No

[EX Q]: Context: 'so If I understand correctly, the Deal is I get 3 Food and 2 Water: While you get 3 Firewood and 1 Water?' 'I was just negotiating the water for now.  I was trying to do one at a time.' 'ah, I'm definitely ok with doing one at a time: A 2:1 split is definitely OK with me: The issue is, if we consider each individually, it might be harder to come to a deal, but I'm happy to do it your way.'
Utterance: 'How about you take 1 firewood, I''l take 2 and with food, you can have 2 and I'll take one package.  I have two very hungry boys!'
[EX A]:
Yes