We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Ex Input:
Sent1: Amendment protects the right of the states to arm their militias.
 Sent2: Especially since one of your arguments is that the Second Amendment only protects arms suitable for militia duties, which would be all semi-automatic firearms in existence!

Ex Output:
Not similar


Ex Input:
Sent1: Innocent people were butchered where no guns were permitted, while nobody is being shot full of holes in the schools where carrying a gun is permitted.
 Sent2: Guns don't kill people, people kill people: absolutely true, but guns allow people to kill people with greater efficiency, which is not necessarily a good thing outside of the battlefield.

Ex Output:
Not similar


Ex Input:
Sent1: If there were a certain number of cases involving concealed carriers having their guns stolen right off of their person, then it might be worth noting.
 Sent2: For instance, if something was written that says Gun owners should be skilled with their own firearms, but someone leaves off the s.

Ex Output:

Not similar