In this task, you will be shown a sentence, and you should determine whether it is overruling or non-overruling. In law, an overruling sentence is a statement that nullifies a previous case decision as a precedent by a constitutionally valid statute or a decision by the same or higher ranking court which establishes a different rule on the point of law involved. Classify your answers into overruling or non-overruling

Input: Consider Input: to the extent that people v. milton, supra, 55 cal.app.4th 365, people v. allen, supra, 53 cal.app.4th 1127, people v. sanders, supra, 52 cal.app.4th 175, people v. robles, supra, 51 cal.app.4th 627, people v. ervin, supra, 50 cal.app.4th 259, people v. holloway (1996) 47 cal.app.4th 1757 [ 55 cal.rptr.2d 547], people v. howard (1996) 47 cal.app.4th 1526 [ 55 cal.rptr.2d 520], and people v. ramos (1996) 47 cal.app.4th 432 [ 55 cal.rptr.2d 1] are inconsistent with the views expressed in this opinion, they are disapproved.

Output: overruling


Input: Consider Input: because hummel, the conflict case, involved a motion filed under rule 3.800(a), we disapproved the first district's decision only "to the extent it [wa]s inconsistent with" anderson.

Output: overruling


Input: Consider Input: to the extent that this conclusion is inconsistent with in re e.t . , 2008 vt 48, 184 vt. 273, 959 a.2d 544, or in re l.g. , 158 vt. 639, 603 a.2d 381 (1992) (mem.), those cases are overruled.


Output: overruling