We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

Example Input: First you tried to link the existence of the second amendment with incidents of criminal deeds.
Example Output: Valid

Example Input: The lunatic fringe here has called me anti gun as well, and I can just about promise I have more guns than any 5 of them put together.
Example Output: Valid

Example Input: What the Court is saying, at least to me, is that if you can prove the firearm you have has some usefulness for militia service then the 2nd.
Example Output:
Valid