Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.

Input: Consider Input: In Washington, many informed voters chose not to submit their primary ballot because they knew the delegates were already divided and it was used simply for the Democrats to collect information. It was widely advertised in the local papers there that the primary was in fact meaningless. Thus, the primary ballot was also not at all representative of reflecting the will of the voters.

Output: No


Input: Consider Input: That's an interesting take. I don't know if I'd be for or against that but it's worth pondering. But it is worth remembering in the quest for statehood and crafting of the Constitution, the 101 million acres the state received and the sub surface mineral rights were negotiated and fought for. Hence, this owner state concept is what has given us the oil wealth.

Output: No


Input: Consider Input: Maybe Penair could use the older planes to send more flights to the Pribilofs (St. George and St. Paul) where currently the 3 times per week flights are sold out all the way through July.


Output: No