In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Example Input: Comment: You don't have a strong erection? Bummer for you. Try not drinking alcohol and exercise.
Example Output: Sexual-explicit

Example Input: Comment: More "FAKE NEWS" from the Trump administration regarding the player's peaceful protests. 

Pence and Trump should stick to things they actually understand, for instance the reasoning behind the protest in Charlottesville, last night.

The only reason Pence was there was so he could walk out in "protest".....what a phoney!
Example Output: Non-sexual-explicit

Example Input: Comment: Hey, pretty good insult with that "channeling" bit.  A twofer!  But I think you meant to write "stupid response to an unasked question" for your other line to make sense, at least to me anyway.

I will point out that JJ implied in his first post that Gary Johnson couldn't provide a name of a foreign leader to Chris Mathews and then kind of waffles or just doesn't really tell the full truth in his second post.  My guess is he saw Colbert's skit or read some partisan attack piece and decided to run with it.  Before replying, I recommend you either watch the interview or read the transcript of the interview.  Whew, you almost had me there.  I was ready to switch my vote to Jill Stein.

I eagerly await your next round of insults, enjoy!
Example Output:
Non-sexual-explicit