In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: threat and non-threat. Threat is a statement that someone will be hurt or harmed, especially if the person does not do something in particular.

Ex Input:
Comment: I have come to think that "...the infusion of grace by means of the sacraments properly dispensed" is, in large part, self serving ecclesiastical claptrap (I actually would use a much stronger word beginning with "B", but that one wouldn't pass the censors).

Ex Output:
Non-threat


Ex Input:
Comment: If a dude is actively threatening to kill someone, a head shot with a scoped .308 or .223 may be reasonable.  The same is not true of a dude sitting alone in his house.  In the latter case, there is no active threat.  We people instruct police to kill the dude anyway just to prove that they must do what we want when we want it.  Okay, if that is the kind of society we want, so be it.  Recall, that we really know nothing about what the dude did, but I guess the point is that we should kill him to teach others to do what police officers tell them regardless of the circumstance.  Okay, whatever.  We craft the society in our image and reap the benefit when citizens kill because we have taught them how little value life has.

Ex Output:
Threat


Ex Input:
Comment: No free Plan Parenthood. Dam people having kids without much thought.yada yada. My tax pennies are paying,yada yada. Food stamps shame. Yada yada. This is compared to German soldiers stealing light bulbs,yada yada. Lol. Repugs voted donald, that explains it all. Heartless ijiots.

Ex Output:

Non-threat