In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.

Input: Consider Input: Comment: Its approx. 270 miles from Chicago to Louisville. How easy would it have been to use a company vehicle to re-position the crew? This ugly incident doesn't say much for United's manpower deployment and planning.The lawsuit alone will be expensive enough, but the ill will of the travelling public will be far greater.

Output: Agree


Input: Consider Input: Comment: Sustainability?
What is sustainable about deforestation?
The amount of useful soil on Canadian land is quite thin, compared to more southern climes. When you take a tree and ship it fifteen hundred miles south, you have also taken the nutrients that built that tree with it.

By sustainable, are you suggesting that Canadian foresters take a tree and leave an equivalent amount of fertilizer? No? Then explain further this "sustainable" thing...

Output: Disagree


Input: Consider Input: Comment: Canada's CO2 contributions are significant, especially on a per capita basis. Don't forget that we should really be factoring in emissions being exported to foreign countries like China through proposals like Kinder Morgan.

Donald Trump or no Donald Trump, the world is already well underway to a transition to an economy based on renewable energy. In the US much of the work is being done at the state level, and carbon pricing is already common in many other countries, particularly across Europe.

The challenges in Ontario have gone from poor implementation(from poor leadership) and restrictions faced through trade law. The actual big picture was the right one. A few Green MPP's would have helped.

The problem with Trudeau's plan is the proposed carbon tax(for provinces without carbon pricing) is too low, and you can't be serious about reducing emissions while simultaneously building pipelines. He's trying to please everyone at the same time. This makes for ineffective climate policy.


Output: Disagree