Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.

[EX Q]: How about Governor Walker using his executive order or veto pen and literally gut all state pork projects until the fiscal mess is fixed.
[EX A]: No

[EX Q]: First off, it's not a theory: a vote not cast for Hillary is a vote for Trump. Period.
Hillary is a strong supporter of health care: she brought the issue to the fore years ago where it remained.
Women's rights: she's been a champion of equal pay and other issues (Planned Parenthood) for decades.
African-Americans overwhelmingly support her. Do you know why?
Minimum wage: $12. Not as high as Bern, but a large improvement.
Gun control: a decades' long supporter of toughening laws.
Immigration: supporter of Obama.
Education: platform calls for free community college; debt-free public university attendance through $2500/year credit.
So, I don't know what you mean about her progressive ideas and credentials. Not as far as Bern, right, but a MASSIVE, MASSIVE difference from Trump.
Please, read this and learn a bit about her: http://www.pbs.org/newshour/updates/hillary-clinton-believe-candidate-stands-10-issues/
[EX A]: No

[EX Q]: "Political reality" is much more than just reverting to a rhetorical slogan. I would've figured that you knew that already based on most of your comments relating to things you that you support. There is over 85 synonyms for 'incongruent.' Take your pick, they are all correct.
[EX A]:
No