We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

[EX Q]: To take an example: the tax-code contains numerous loopholes that allow unscrupulous folks to take advantage of it and keep money that many argue they should be paying into the system.
[EX A]: Invalid

[EX Q]: Why is it then that this right to kill our aggressors in self defense should end with our lives?
[EX A]: Valid

[EX Q]: Dsa posted some figures on the old forum saying that less people end up dying if the death penalty is kept in place.
[EX A]:
Valid