In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine the neutral choice based on your inference from the statement and your commonsense knowledge. The neutral choice is a sentence that neither agrees nor disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3', corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence. If sentence X agrees with sentence Y, one's correctness follows from the other one. If sentence X disagrees with sentence Y, they can not be correct at the same time.

Ex Input:
Statement: Why not just abolish all the laws that are supposed to protect These folk; because if you do not have legal services, the laws are unenforceable and useless. Choices: 1. These folk need legal services to protect them. 2. There is no way to enforce the laws with no legal services. 3. The people can protect themselves against the law.

Ex Output:
1


Ex Input:
Statement: In what is artistically a predominantly Mughal city, the National Museum, on Janpath (Queensway) just south of Rajpath, is worth a visit for its collection of old Hindu sculpture, in particular those from medieval India of the kingdom of Vijayanagar. Choices: 1. The National Museum has the largest collection of Hindu sculpture than any other museum. 2. The National Museum that is south of Rajpath has a collection of Hindu sculptures.  3. There are no museums located south of Rajpath, they're all in Rajpath. 

Ex Output:
1


Ex Input:
Statement: Among Professor Rogers' publications are two books on mediation and the law that received Book Prizes in 1987 and 1989,  a text for law students written with Richard A. Salem and a legal treatise written with Craig McEwen. Choices: 1. Professor Rodgers wrote one book, which received no awards. 2. Professor Rodgers wrote two books on meditation and law. 3. Professor Rodgers was a lawyer for 18 years and a judge for 10 years.

Ex Output:

3