We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

[Q]: Sent1: I think there should be a death penalty because, all those innocent people getting killed for no damn reason is unfair.
 Sent2: I agree that the people who are killed are mostly innocent people and that those killed by the death penalty are almost certainly guilty of the crime.
[A]: Similar


[Q]: Sent1: The person who said that the death penalty should be used for people who are convicted of multiple-burglaries sounds like a complete knucklehead.
 Sent2: When someone mentions a criminal deterrence factor with death sentences, it sounds like a bad joke or total ignorance.
[A]: Not similar


[Q]: Sent1: It is also possible for an innocent person to be sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole, but nobody is making the argument to stop sending people to prison.
 Sent2: First, it is more expensive than sentencing someone to life in prison.
[A]:
Not similar