In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

Example Input: Comment: Buddhists are FAKES! Their schtick is to shave their heads and wear orange rags begging at doors like the Mormons. They are rude and cheapskates. Not polite or peaceful at all. They covet rich expensive things like ordinary folks. In Thailand the soldiers and police are arresting them for bribes, tax evasion, rape and pedophilia (like Catholics). Trying to arrest one leader in a flying saucer-shaped temple for an investment scam but nobody can find him. They all look alike.
Example Output: Identity-attack

Example Input: Comment: They are making themselves invisible as individual women, while making themselves very visible as Muslims.
Example Output: Identity-attack

Example Input: Comment: The problem here is that Islam embodies hatred of all other religions. The Koran clearly and unambiguously requires the murder of homosexuals among other infidels (chapter 4). While the media claims Islam is a religion of peace, muslims have never made such a claim. 
So, the question is: Are we required to tolerate their intolerance? 
And further more, given that the media, the establishment and the political left have far, far more hatred for white christians than muslims, shouldn't we be primarily concerned with Christophobia?
Example Output:
Identity-attack