In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: insult and non-insult. Insult is any lanugage or act that is disrespectful or scornfully abusive.

[EX Q]: Comment: Anyone who does any technical work for me at all must be licensed, insured, and bonded so that I know they've met at least the minimum technical performance requirements for the position.  I also need to know that such job performers know, understand, and are able to meet minimum quality requirements.  I don't have the time or money to "experiment" with every Tom, Dick, or Harry that comes along.  Fortune tellers.....not so much.  Only idiots use fortune tellers, anyway.
[EX A]: Insult

[EX Q]: Comment: Heck Glenn, you deleted the comment I replied to.

I do have a connection to Fiji, but it isn't as if I live there or anything.  However, I have many friends (or at least people who know me) in Savusavu.  I refuse to "search" for Gabbard's "anti-Muslim" bias.  You need to prove it to me.  I have not seen any evidence so far that it is real.  

She is against "Muslim Extremists" but then who isn't.  And the conflict between India and Pakistan hasn't been resolved all these years later.  But there is no way you can convince me that Representative Gabbard's primary goal in life is to destroy Islam.  

Again, Nuance.  The problems of the world are rarely black and white.  (unless you live in Mississippi, but that is a different subject.)
[EX A]: Non-insult

[EX Q]: Comment: GAK!
[EX A]:
Non-insult