In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.
--------
Question: Sentence: The path to the lake was blocked, so we couldn't use it .
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the path because The path is something you use to get to the lake, you're already on the path. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

Answer: Wrong


Question: Sentence: Many people start to read Paul's books and can't put them down. They are gripped because Paul writes so well.
 Reason: The 'They' refers to people because he spends a lot of time in his writings telling the story of Israel. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

Answer: Wrong


Question: Sentence: I stuck a pin through a carrot. When I pulled the pin out, it left a hole.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the pin because of the hole in the carrot. This is not a typo. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

Answer:
Wrong