In this task, you're given a statement, and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence clearly disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3' corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.

[EX Q]: Statement: Otherwise, why call them fixed stars? Choices:  1. Why call them suns? 2. If that wasn't the case, why would we call them fixed strs? 3. Why call them fixed stars?
[EX A]: 1

[EX Q]: Statement: Today the original park, which isn't remotely as fantastic as Disneyland, has expanded to six themed areas in an attempt to attract audiences of all ages and interests. Choices:  1. The original park has been said to be better than Disneyland. 2. The park has been expanded in size as well to accommodate for all the new rides. 3. Disneyland can not compare to the original park as it expanded to attract customers of all ages.
[EX A]: 1

[EX Q]: Statement: that after all they're only people too in that they're subject to corruption just like any other human being and they do have a lot of power Choices:  1. They're incorruptible because they have a lot of power.  2. They do have a lot of power, but they're subject to corruption just like any human being.  3. They could be less susceptible to corruption than other human beings. 
[EX A]:
1