In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

[EX Q]: Comment: They still do not  like  them dam Yankees in the South so much ado about noting.   I just whish I had toe money to move to NC for common sense and other reasons ( I am tired of the leftist coast).
[EX A]: Non-sexual-explicit

[EX Q]: Comment: The voters in this country have SPOKEN very DECISIVELY, Bye, Bye, Good riddance   Hillary & Billy,  Do not let the door hit you in the Arse on your way out.
[EX A]: Sexual-explicit

[EX Q]: Comment: Perhaps if we deal with drug addiction as a mental & physical illness instead of criminal activity, the addicts will not waste our $$$ or their time being incarcerated instead of rehabilitated; other nations found this quite effective.  But as you know, the private prison lobby is quite powerful and has many key legislators in their pocket. 
If you really wish to find the gateway drug, its alcohol.  Its much more readily available and has been well documented to be a truly addictive drug.  
Hopefully you will see the medical benefits of marijuana.
"When followers of a particular sect enter into commercial activity as a matter of choice, the limits they accept on their own conduct as a matter of conscience and faith are not to be superimposed on the statutory schemes which are binding on others in that activity." (1992 opinion on US v Lee 1982).  This forum isn't conducive to lengthy discussion; Scalia obviously shifted crazy right after this.  You couldn't find this in your search???
[EX A]:
Non-sexual-explicit