In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: insult and non-insult. Insult is any lanugage or act that is disrespectful or scornfully abusive.

Q: Comment: Ross is a bully, just like his boss. 

He is engaging in a war of words in the hopes of convincing Canada and Mexico to give in quickly when negotiations start. Unfortunately for him he has tipped his hand. He does not just want a quick deal, he NEEDS a quick deal. 

The best thing we can do now is not agree to his timetable. No deal by the end of the year.

I personally do not see how we could get to a deal by the end of the year anyway. The terms Ross will offer us will likely be so oppressive that no Canadian politician could accept them without losing their seat and their party's standing in the next election. The same goes for Mexico. 

Negotiations will be protracted unless Ross caves, something he seems disinclined to do. I am not in favor of giving him the semblence of a deal as a face saving jesture. The guy is  jerk.

We had better get ready for a post NAFTA world, just in case.

A: Insult
****
Q: Comment: my god a  lunatic lib troll of complete stupidity

A: Insult
****
Q: Comment: RG: "Haroldson (benton county DA) said in a telephone interview with The Associated Press that sexual abuse charges were not filed because he “didn’t see any evidence in the case to indicate that the touching was done for purposes of sexual arousal, but rather it was done in a hazing context.” 

 say WHAT?  sexual abuse is sexual abuse.  what matter the "intent"?  it wasn't meant to harmless.  isn't rape a sexual assault done without an  underlying motive of sexual arousal?  it's about control and power - like a hazing.    this DA has his head aimed the wrong way.

A:
Non-insult
****