instruction:
The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.
question:
Context: 'not soo good, i am hungry' 'Uh oh. What are you preferences on supplies?' 'food, then water, then firewood, and yours?'
Utterance: 'water, food then firewood. It's really hot so I need to make sure we are hydrated. We forgot a bag of supplies that had mostly food so we really could use food. It's hot so firewood isn't necessary. If anything we can get it from around or on a hike.'
answer:
Yes


question:
Context: 'yes i guess you too. i will need more supplies like 3 foods, 2 firewood and1 water' 'I have not really camped before so I am looking for as many supplies as possible.  What about I get 3 food, 3 firewood, and 1 water. ' 'funnny you but no. so what else will i be left with if i give you those. okay let say i get 2 food, 2 firewood and 1 water.'
Utterance: 'I am really bad at cooking so will probably need an extra good just because I'll ruin one of the 3.  Plus Im bringing 2 dogs they can eat the bad food I make 😮  I dont plan on hiking much so how bought I keep all 3 foods, and you keep all 3 waters and we can split the firewood.  2 for me, 1 for you. Great deal!'
answer:
Yes


question:
Context: 'okk i want 3 pack of firewood , 1 pack of food and 1 pack of water' 'could i have 1 firewood, if you'd like 1 pack food?' 'ok i will give '
Utterance: 'sounds great, i'm glad we negotiated'
answer:

No