In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

Example Input: Sentence: Sid explained his theory to Mark but he couldn't understand him.
 Reason: The 'he' refers to mark because Sid was able to communicate with him. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Example Output: Wrong

Example Input: Sentence: The path to the lake was blocked, so we couldn't reach it .
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the lake because it is the most important feature in the island. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Example Output: Wrong

Example Input: Sentence: Fred and Alice had very warm down coats, but they were not enough for the cold in Alaska.
 Reason: The 'they' refers to coats because they were not enough for the cold in Alaska because  Fred and Alice had very warm down coats. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Example Output:
Correct