In this task, you will be presented with a context from an academic paper and a question separated with a 
. You have to answer the question based on the context.

Example Input: For MSA, we acquired the diacritized corpus that was used to train the RDI BIBREF7 diacritizer and the Farasa diacritizer BIBREF31. The corpus contains 9.7M tokens with approximately 194K unique surface forms (excluding numbers and punctuation marks). For testing, we used the freely available WikiNews test set BIBREF31, which is composed of 70 MSA WikiNews articles (18,300 tokens) and evenly covers a variety of genres including politics, economics, health, science and technology, sports, arts and culture. For CA, we obtained a large collection of fully diacritized classical texts (2.7M tokens) from a book publisher, and we held-out a small subset of 5,000 sentences (approximately 400k words) for testing. 
 Question: what datasets were used?
Example Output: diacritized corpus that was used to train the RDI BIBREF7 diacritizer and the Farasa diacritizer BIBREF31 WikiNews test set BIBREF31  large collection of fully diacritized classical texts (2.7M tokens) from a book publisher

Example Input: In the first one, shown in Figure FIGREF12, a special dedicated discriminator is added to the model to control that the latent representation does not contain stylistic information. The second extension of the baseline architecture does not use an adversarial component $D_z$ that is trying to eradicate information on $c$ from component $z$. Instead, the system, shown in Figure FIGREF16 feeds the "soft" generated sentence $\tilde{G}$ into encoder $E$ and checks how close is the representation $E(\tilde{G} )$ to the original representation $z = E(x)$ in terms of the cosine distance. We further refer to it as shifted autoencoder or SAE. We also study a combination of both approaches described above, shown on Figure FIGREF17. 
 Question: What are three new proposed architectures?
Example Output: special dedicated discriminator is added to the model to control that the latent representation does not contain stylistic information shifted autoencoder or SAE combination of both approaches

Example Input: In this subsection, we see the influence of each component of a model on performance by removing or replacing its components. the SNLI dataset is used for experiments, and the best performing configuration is used as a baseline for modifications. We consider the following variants: (i) models that use plain stacked LSTMs, (ii) models with different INLINEFORM0 , (iii) models without INLINEFORM1 , and (iv) models that integrate lower contexts via peephole connections. 
 Question: What were the baselines?
Example Output:
(i) models that use plain stacked LSTMs (ii) models with different INLINEFORM0 (iii) models without INLINEFORM1 (iv) models that integrate lower contexts via peephole connections