In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

[EX Q]: Comment: Victor, Thanks for this 'column'!  Of course there is only one problem with this report. It is too short.  There is so much more 'going on out there'. 
But nothing going on in Hawaii other than the "Grapes of Wrath" responses we hear about on the news.  
As Edmund Burke said, "When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall one by one, an unpitied sacrifice in a contemptible struggle."  [In Hawai'i's case, the bad men are those whose covetousness blinds them to the unfairness of zoning and the need for regulating the housing market.
[EX A]: Non-sexual-explicit

[EX Q]: Comment: Or you could pull your panties out of the crack of your butt.. man-up and respect their right to free speech.. just as the blm and antifa claim.. or are you myopic?
[EX A]: Sexual-explicit

[EX Q]: Comment: There are many heterosexuals that participate in oral and anal sex. It seems that Catholics used to punish them for these acts as well as for taking pleasure with a spouse for vaginal sex IF the purpose was NOT procreation. Should we torture and burn hets for those reasons as well?
[EX A]:
Sexual-explicit