In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.
--------
Question: Comment: The main reason that women do not succeed in the startup space is due to their backstabbing toxic femininity.

Answer: Identity-attack


Question: Comment: This Hitler argument is stale...arming people with military style weapons not only supports the crazy, it reflects our inability to understand why the vast majority of police favor the reasonable regulation of firearms ownership. They would also like to see regulation ammunition that's relates to the ability to kill them regulated. None of this minimal regulation would limit your freedoms...Canada has resonance gun regulations, Australia bans a number of styles of weaponry...they they both seem okay. The difference? Fewer gun deaths, fewer crazies with arms, and a clearer commitment to community safety. It's your children, our police, the neighbor down the street that desires reasonable consideration.

Answer: Non-identity-attack


Question: Comment: While we are still in the lead the Ugly American is getting a run for their money from the Ugly Chinese!  This does have certain benefits; in Japan a little kindness goes a long way and the shops/restaurants are very happy to see you.  Very different from a few years ago . . .

Answer:
Identity-attack