In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: threat and non-threat. Threat is a statement that someone will be hurt or harmed, especially if the person does not do something in particular.
--------
Question: Comment: I'm not the least bit impressed by his fake surprise, and I'm not the least bit interested in hearing his self-serving explanations.  I doubt his parish priest would believe him, and for sure his God won't.

Answer: Non-threat


Question: Comment: So when do we put a bag over Trudeau's head for destroying white culture in Canada with Muslim and Chinese immigration??

Now this crap.
Hey Indians !!1

If you worked more, like the rest of us, Instead of sucking at the taxpayers teat every day - you wouldn't have time to fuss over who kicked your asses

Answer: Threat


Question: Comment: Whatever one's judgment of SNAP, it is a Frankenstein of the RCC's making.  The  RCC hasn't been a beacon of transparency. There is enough evidence outside SNAP to indicate the cover-up of the hierarchy of sexual abusing clerics.  The RCC is about protecting a brand name, not truth.  "All who do evil hate the light and refuse to go near it for fear their sins will be exposed." John 3:20.  SPOTLIGHT had to get subpoenas to view sealed documents that would incriminate the RCC.  Sexual abuse continues, even with Francis' farcical, foot dragging facade, the papal commission on sex abuse.  How long now in existence, how little to show for it.  "And Jesus wept."

Answer:
Non-threat