Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
--------
Question: People have a right to know by checking the local sex offender registry which he is on according to Hutch supporters.  If he's not, then hes no longer a sex criminal unless proven guilty.  You can inform others to check it and it will lead to all of his arrest and protection orders right?. You don't have to slather it all over FB like Mr. Phil ill did. If this is public information, then encourage others to check the public record for sex offenders near them. Who knows, they may find more than what they bargained for. No need for more Moop and trolling on the internet.

Answer: Yes


Question: I've just been made aware that the suspects, caught with a vehicle full of $3200 (per owner) worth of goods stolen in a local break-in, just got off with just about no penalties at all. This is part of a family with multiple convictions over the generations. However, the impounded vehicle (with the stolen goods inside) was released from impound to someone using a false address. The owner will never see his stuff again. The break-in artists are free to steal again. Now we neighbors are concerned that the brave person who followed and reported these professional thieves will be subject to retaliation. This is just a microcosm of the Mat-Su and Alaska justice system...mirrors the murder situation in this article. The reasons for not fully prosecuting miscreants is: Lenient ("too compassionate") District Attorneys; easy judges; and, the kicker: not enough room in our prisons. Violent offenders like Mr. Almeda are barely punished, allowing them to seduce and kill vulnerable young women.

Answer: Yes


Question: Yep- often, actually.  Only ones drinking are Americans by the shawarma shops, when they can get away with it.

Answer:
No