In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

Comment: "It doesn't keep elections 'pure' it just drives the money into STUPID AREAS"

Well, that's a useful bunch of gibberish. It's not like there aren't elections all around the world with campaign finance laws that work quite well.

"You want to get good candidates get rid of every restriction BUT the REPORTING requirements."

Here's a better idea: leave every candidate with limited but equal financing -- so that candidates focus solely on explaining why their policy is superior to all others -- and every citizen, whether billionaire or hobo has but one equal voice.

It's "one man one vote" not "one dollar one vote."
Non-identity-attack

Comment: The German National Socialists are the more obvious ones....also North Korean Communists carry out massive torchlight parades...a pox on the White Suprematists , BLM and the globalist black hooded rent a riotists.
Identity-attack

Comment: >>I'll just repeat my recommendation ...
.
Sounds more like whining, after losing an argument.

Non-identity-attack