In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine the neutral choice based on your inference from the statement and your commonsense knowledge. The neutral choice is a sentence that neither agrees nor disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3', corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence. If sentence X agrees with sentence Y, one's correctness follows from the other one. If sentence X disagrees with sentence Y, they can not be correct at the same time.

Q: Statement: During their Directoire, a new wave of executions ' the White (royalist) Terror ' decimated the Jacobins and their supporters. Choices: 1. No executions of Jacobins and their supporters took place. 2. Many of the Jacobins and their supporters were executed. 3. The Jacobins and their supporters were terrified by the wave of executions.

A: 3
****
Q: Statement: which surprised me that that uh through the jury discussion they were able to convince him against his original opinion so maybe that speaks well for juries Choices: 1. Jury discussions never change anyone's opinions.  2. Jury discussions often result in people changing their original opinions.  3. Through jury discussion, they were able to convince him to abandon his original opinion; perhaps that speaks well of juries. 

A: 2
****
Q: Statement: yeah yeah so that wasn't too bad Choices: 1. No, that was horrible, completely wrong.  2. It didn't look as good as we hoped, but that wasn't too bad.  3. Yes, it wasn't that bad.

A:
2
****