We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

[EX Q]: Lott's More Guns, Less Crime is the bible of the national movement to persuade state legislatures to pass so-called "concealed carry" laws, which permit citizens to carry concealed firearms.
[EX A]: Valid

[EX Q]: To support this open carry ban, you have argued that no right exists to carry a loaded handgun outside the home���making them useless and therefore the ban is just sweeping up the crumbs.
[EX A]: Valid

[EX Q]: You guys have willed yourselves just as retarded as the people who claimed (And still claim) that the second amendment only conveys a right for the national guard to have weapons.
[EX A]:
Valid