In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

[EX Q]: Sentence: Mark told Pete many lies about himself, which Pete included in his book. He should have been more  truthful.
 Reason: The 'He' refers to mark because The lies were included in the book Pete wrote; therefore Paul was the one untruthful. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
[EX A]: Correct

[EX Q]: Sentence: Sam took French classes from Adam, because he was eager to speak it fluently.
 Reason: The 'he' refers to sam because SAM THAN ADAM MORE LIKE. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
[EX A]: Wrong

[EX Q]: Sentence: Fred was supposed to run the dishwasher, but he put it off,  because he wanted to watch TV. But the show turned out to be boring, so he changed his mind and turned it on.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the dishwasher because it is a dishwasher, but not necessarily a dishwasher. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
[EX A]:
Wrong