In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Input: Consider Input: Comment: Obama failed in closing Guantanamo Bays prison, after two full terms. Was it his Bay of Pigs and did he learn? A question rarely asked and never answered. But hey, lets give him a Nobel and call it good!

Output: Non-obscene


Input: Consider Input: Comment: Those of you who write about enviro-hypocrisy and such, please help me out. Just so I know ... 

1. People file a lawsuit because they worry about ozone layers, climate change, species going extinct, polar ice melting, glaciers disappearing and all that. They didn't blow something up or burn something down, they went straight to the channels our society provides for, all orderly and appropriate. What should they do? Just shut up? Because we know better? 

2. Is there any concern for the environment that isn't what you call enviro-hypocrisy? Can a person who lives like the rest of us (drives a car, dresses in clothes, lives in a house, consumes electricity, and exists as a normal person) still want public policies that might slow down the trend without being a hypocrite? Or are only people who run around dressed in leaves and sleeping on the ground entitled to care about these things?

Output: Non-obscene


Input: Consider Input: Comment: John the Liar McCain has one motivation: he wants the press to like him and call him a "Maverick". For that, he's willing to break his campaign promises, stab his party in the back, and subject the American people to keep living with this horrible law.
"Hero" my ass.


Output: Obscene