Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.

Q: No I did not. You promoted the idea that children are sissies if they can't take pain.

I simply counter pointed that with the fact that physical pain is not a gauge of anything and if you want to call kids sissies for not wanting to get hurt. 

This while the adult population of this countries is undergoing a rash of adults hooked on opiate pain killers, because you know, adults use medicine to take care of and manage their pain, but lets not do that for children cause we don't want them soft. Right?

Just because we as a society don't agree with the idea of children in pain doesn't make us wussies or sissies or wimps or whatever name you have poised on your tongue to call us. It means we care about children and want them to have a better life than us, and if it is one filled with less pain, I do not see how that is a bad thing. Care to enlighten me how it is a good thing?

A: Yes
****
Q: What the hell is wrong with people! Sick fucks! These are children not animals!

A: Yes
****
Q: You recall wrong. He converted in 1964, while he didn't get the notice for draft until 1966-67. And no, he was not a coward.

A:
No
****