instruction:
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
question:
True enough.  Alas, for many conservatives the world can only be black or white, and Mr. Trump is Dubya on steroids.  Not only are you "against me" if you're not "for me," you're a loser and stupid and (choose your Trump invective here).  Hyperbole should no longer be tempered:  Mr. Trump is a "leader" in the same vein as Hitler and Mussolini.  Consistently deprecating (and increasingly openly violent toward) to those who not only disagree with him, but are doing their jobs (or not) as journalists.  Not simply a cartoonish narcissistic blowhard, but a rallying point for the ignorant, angry and uninformed.  There will be violence, and worse, coming from the Trump camp, I fear.  The Republican party created this monster in 50 years since Nixon (both their racist, misogynist, homophobic "core" and the individual now leading them), and when you sleep with dogs, you get fleas.  They have no idea where to scratch, which is both gratifyingly hilarious and frightening.
answer:
Yes


question:
Sorry, Dingman, as much sense as you make, I'm keeping my head firmly in the sand, where it's been for the last 35 years.  As an insider in a capacity professional ethics keeps me from revealing, I learned very quickly how corrupt Alaska politics was, and remains.  I forgot about the politicians, saved my money, and kept my sanity.  Now I'm moving out of state.  Alaska isn't worth the effort.  I realize I'm part of the problem but, in conventional terms, there isn't any solution.  Things are far too degenerated for that.  As St. Ronnie once said, "If it's going to take a bloodbath, let's get it over with."  He was speaking about young protestors, of whom I was one.  How deliciously ironic I can quote him approvingly now.
answer:
Yes


question:
Roll a vehicle in a neighborhood = drunk, stupid or both. He's one lucky guy. Kudos to the citizens who helped out.
answer:

Yes