Given a document and an entity the task is to select the author's sentiment towards the entity. Sentiments can be Positive, Neutral and Negative. Select Positive if the article expresses a positive view towards the given entity or praises its quality or skills. Select Neutral if the document expresses no clear view towards the entity or has equal amounts of positive and negative statements or expressing some fact/quote by someone else. Select Negative if the article expresses a negative view towards like harsh remarks, criticizing entities action/decision etc. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

What is the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Mark Levin Unloads ? NATIONAL HARBOR  MD â Nationally syndicated radio superstar  Mark Levin  joined SiriusXM hosts Matt Boyle and Amanda House at CPAC on Breitbart News Saturday  praising President Donald Trumpâs actions for advancing conservatism  and making explosive statements about the Left  Obama and his administration  the media  guns  and Democratsâ plans to impeach the president.
 Levin  was speaking to thousands of conservatives who gathered just outside of the nationâs capital at the annual pilgrimage for the conservative movement. Boyle and House were broadcasting live from CPAC  as the âGreat Oneâ sat down with them to reflect on President Trumpâs speech to the conference on Friday  and examining the first year of the Trump administration.
âThis president is so different â  Levin  began. â He  threw out the written speech and  he  said  âLet me talk to you.ââ
â He  connects with you individually â the former Reagan administration senior aide continued  making the observation of the president that  â he  talks like a regular person â as opposed to a polished politician with a team of handlers.
Boyle and Houseâwho respectively are the political editor and deputy political editor of Breitbart Newsâinvited  Levin  to unpack  his  thoughts on how the presidentâs actions stack up with conservative priorities  given  Levin âs pedigree and well-earned reputation as one of the foremost champions of constitutional conservatism. Levin dedicates much of the time on  his  wildly successful radio show holding accountable public officials who stray from conservative priorities.
âWhich is fine by me â  Levin  commented to Boyle and House  âbecause itâs the end result that matters.â
It is no secret that  Levin  does not agree with President Trump on everything. âBut I didnât agree with Reagan on everything â either   Levin  noted  a comparison noteworthy because of the tremendous respect  Levin  has for the nationâs 40th president  under whom  he  served.
 Levin   Boyle  and House then turned to the red-hot issues that are currently dominating the headlines  and explaining what is behind those narratives.
âIf the Democrats take the House  theyâre going to move to impeach this president  to reverse the results of the election â  Levin  claimed. âTheyâve been into this silent coup since the day he was elected. They are furious that he is president of the United States.â
 Levin  called Special Counsel Robert Mueller a âhit manâ and compared Muellerâs investigation to a âmob operation.â
âThis is a grotesque miscarriage of justice â  Levin  insists. âSomething about this stinks to high heaven.â
 Levin  said that  he  noticed a pattern  relying upon  his  experience as a top Justice Department official.  He  recalled the moment during the 2016 election when  he  concluded  âweâve got domestic surveillance of Trump World.â
 Levin  insists that this was âpolitical domestic surveillance â and that a host of characters  from the Obama White House  to top officials in the Obama-Lynch Justice Department  to leaders at the FBI  must have known about it when it was happening.
There are âhardcore anti-constitutional progressive leftistsâ who are out to get President Trump  and the entire conservative agenda would be endangered if the presidentâs enemies succeed   Levin  warned.
Neutral

What is the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Jim Willcox ? What’s the winning combination? The Super Bowl is an ideal event to highlight TVs  especially those with larger screens. Also  current TV models have been out for nearly a year by February  so there’s been a natural decrease in price  says Jim Willcox  senior electronics editor at Consumer Reports.
Scour social media. Retailers often reward their social media followers with notifications about sales. These act as another “tool in your arsenal” in your pursuit of a good deal   Willcox  says.
Look for a price match guarantee. Check a retailer’s price matching policy. Some stores will refund you the difference if an item drops in price within a certain window after purchase. The one caveat?  Willcox  says items purchased during sale periods like Black Friday are often excluded from price matching.
Check a retailer’s price matching policy. Some stores will refund you the difference if an item drops in price within a certain window after purchase. The one caveat?  Willcox  says items purchased during sale periods like Black Friday are often excluded from price matching. Do your homework. Electronics retailer Best Buy also said the lead-up to the Super Bowl and the holiday season are two of the best times to buy a TV. But if you’re shopping in a pinch  the store also offers a Weekly Ad and Deal of the Day section. If you can’t time your TV purchase  you might still be able to find a deal. Other retailers may have similar options — check their websites or follow their social media to get their deals.
Positive

What is the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Juliet Jacobsen ? Dr. Thalia Krakower (right)  a primary care physician  gets advice from Dr. Juliet Jacobsen  medical director of the Continuum Project at Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston  during a January training session on how to talk to seriously ill patients about their goals and values. (Melissa Bailey/KHN) (Photo: Melissa Bailey  Kaiser Health News)
Dr. Juliet Jacobsen  medical director of the Continuum Project at Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston  trains primary care doctors in how to talk to patients with serious illnesses about their goals and values. (Melissa Bailey/KHN) (Photo: Melissa Bailey  Kaiser Health News)
At Mass General  Dr. Juliet Jacobsen  a palliative care physician  serves as medical director for the Continuum Project  a large-scale effort to quickly train clinicians to have these conversations  document them and share what they learn with one another. The project ramped up in January with the first session in a series that aims to reach 250 primary care providers at the hospital.
At a recent training session   Jacobsen  gave clinicians a laminated page with scripted language to help them along. When the participants role-played with professional actors  difficulties quickly emerged.
"How long should we let them be silent and sad?" Krakower asked  Jacobsen . "We always step in too soon."
Physicians let patients speak an average 18 seconds before interrupting them  research has found.  Jacobsen  encouraged doctors to allow more silence  and to respond to patientsâ emotions  not just to their words.
The scripted conversation is quite different from what doctors have been trained to do   Jacobsen  acknowledged. It doesn't aim to reach any decision  nor to fill out end-of-life paperwork.
In a pilot at Brigham and Women's Hospital in Boston   Jacobsen  noted  the conversations typically lasted 22 to 26 minutes.
At another moment during role-play   Jacobsen  stepped in when a doctor skipped over the section in the script where she was supposed to share prognostic information.
The topic is avoided for many reasons   Jacobsen  later said: Clinicians' schedules are crammed. They may not want to scare families with a timeline that turns out to be wrong. And they may not know what language to use  especially when the disease trajectory is uncertain.
When a doctorâs message moves abruptly from "everything's great" to "she's dying  " Jacobsen  said  patients and their families don't have enough time to adjust to the bad news.
To address that problem   Jacobsen 's team suggests language that helps clinicians discuss a prognosis without asserting certainty: "I worry the decline we have seen is going to continue " or  "I worry something serious may happen in the next few months."

Neutral