The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.

[EX Q]: Context: 'Sorry to bother you, I don't need anything other than food package. So better you could give me 2 food package and take 3 water and fire wood. Please consider this deal.' 'No i absolutely need 2 food packages. So if you cannot agree to take 1 food 2 water and 2 firewood i will walk away.  If you have children with you would would also need water which you are not asking for. ' 'Yes I too have children so only I am considering 2 food package, 1 water is enough for me and I dont need any firewood. So please accept this deal'
Utterance: '😡 I am walking away if i cannot get 2 food packages 1 water and 1 firewood. That leaves you with 1 food 2 waters and 2 firewoods. This is a good deal for you concidering that you havent been asking for water for your children until i mentioned that you need water for you children. Do you agree??'
[EX A]: No

[EX Q]: Context: 'Hi there!' 'hello !🙂' 'What are your preferences?'
Utterance: 'I am about to go on a charity event with a kid from the make a wish foundation, I would like to get some firewood and maybe some food for his trip so he wont be cold and hungry at least.'
[EX A]: Yes

[EX Q]: Context: 'food is necessary for all living beings. '
Utterance: 'I am traveling with a big group so we need more water.'
[EX A]:
Yes