In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

Input: Consider Input: Sentence: I can't cut that tree down with that axe; it is too small.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the axe because MORE LIKELY TO REFER THAT TREE. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

Output: Wrong


Input: Consider Input: Sentence: The sack of potatoes had been placed below the bag of flour, so it had to be moved first.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the bag of flour because I believe that it would actually refer to the flour, because one would generally remove the item on top first.  Removing the object below might cause the item on top to fall. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

Output: Correct


Input: Consider Input: Sentence: Kirilov ceded the presidency to Shatov because he was less popular.
 Reason: The 'he' refers to kirilov because more popular people could get the presidency. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 


Output: Correct