The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.

Q: Context: 'Feel free to counter, but I'm not loving anything that I've gotten so far.' '1 firewood, 2 water, 1 food for me which should mean we each get 2 priority packs -' 'Feel free to counter, but I haven't liked anything so far.'
Utterance: 'what do you think?'

A: No
****
Q: Context: 'Fair enough! Thank you! I would really appreciate any extra water that you have too?' 'I need some water...I'll give you two of mine so that I can hang on to one.Is that okay with you?' 'Yes, that works! Thank you! Where are you heading out to camp?'
Utterance: 'Out in the North Carolina mountains! We camp there every summer. So many great memories!'

A: No
****
Q: Context: 'I was just negotiating the water for now.  I was trying to do one at a time.' 'ah, I'm definitely ok with doing one at a time: A 2:1 split is definitely OK with me: The issue is, if we consider each individually, it might be harder to come to a deal, but I'm happy to do it your way.' 'How about you take 1 firewood, I''l take 2 and with food, you can have 2 and I'll take one package.  I have two very hungry boys!'
Utterance: 'Is there a reason you want the 2:1 split? Food my group's largest priority by a large margin (We eat a lot). It's worth a lot more to my group then the firewood would be.'

A:
Yes
****