Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.

Q: Boozer:  That's quite an answer.....I think you address about a dozen of the major interwoven issues.  I hope your comments are widely read as they provide a real incentive for people to think about things most would rather just take them for granted and not peek behind the curtain.  Thanks for publishing them....regards, Gary

A: No
****
Q: ok...the story is strange. the story is ironic.  the story tells of what these people did...thinking it was a good idea.  the story tells of the fail.  one can laugh at a situation.  this story has the elements of amusing.  we read amusing stories everyday. the guy trading a monkey and girl scout money for sex...another guy falls through a ceiling  - twice ...the second  time being in front of a witness.  another guy has kiddie porn on his cell and then goes to claim it after being aware that the cops were aware. another guy has his kid shoot him in the leg for insurance money and then loses his leg.....  is this not funny because she asked to be shot?

A: Yes
****
Q: Yes , I'd like it to stay the way it was-----bootleggers faced huge fines and jail time when caught.  Every few months we'd read about someone getting busted for stupidly trying to sneak booze into dry areas. Once you make easy access to booze available to all---the problems will triple over night.  Real people will die and even more families will be destroyed over more alcohol in the area. One of the best kept secrets is how rape and incest are off the charts in the bush.  Much of it is alcohol fueled. Things are about to get a lot worse---so a few people can make money.

A:
Yes
****