Categorize the comment on the basis of toxicity. If the comment is toxic (harmful, malicious, derogatory, threat, insult, identity attck, etc.) output Yes, otherwise output No.

Q: Why would you no longer need to dredge when port is finished? Doesn't silt continue to come in on tide fluctuations?  Sounds like $290 million dollars of BS. Let cargo companies help pay for it and upkeep. They make billions on shipping cargo here and we pay for all upkeep on docks? Stupid. Their ships. Their repairs and upgrades. Simple!  Must be Juneau's idea of free market!

A: No
****
Q: To some extent being the Governor in Alaska means something.   Individual members of the legislature are NOT the equivalent of the Governor because he/she did not run for or be elected to that authority level.  For this reason it is very important that the Governor be connected to the people.  In this case he (still) is (interested in what they think).  Individual members of the legislature may be sincere in his/her belief system.  But that's all it is: his/her special, personal bias.  Save we pray from the hydra.  Thanks.

A: No
****
Q: "… most" and … rarely" obviously confused you. And it isn't necessary to look across the pond, either. U of Cal students LAST YEAR had a tuition hike-fueled protest in which a large portion of the student body walked out. 
Perhaps you think it's a great idea to have 23-year olds begin their professional lives $20,000 in debt, with interest rates far higher than cars or homes.
It wasn't always this way, just this way since Republicans began their war on the middle-class and the worship of the financial sector. In the sixties, tuition was extremely cheap at state universities; NDSL's had ridiculously cheap interest rates.

A:
No
****