In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: toxic and non-toxic. Toxicity is defiend as anything that is rude, disrespectful, or unreasonable that would make someone want to leave a converation.

Input: Consider Input: Comment: "Confederation" by this..."Confederation" there... why so much use of this word when Canada is a Federal state and NOT a Confederate Association of SOVEREIGN States, the usual meaning of « Confederation »?

Output: Non-toxic


Input: Consider Input: Comment: "You should be applauding the proposed immigration reform, not condemning it. Yet you criticize a plan put forth by Senators Cotton and Perdue" -- Thor52

You questioned the writer's motive. The writer's motive is to condemn the proposed bill.
Why should Mr. Connolly applaud the policy if he disagrees with it? Why shouldn't he criticize Senators Cotton and Perdue? That is still legal in this country.
You criticized former President Obama often. You criticize Democratic lawmakers all the time. You label them "liberal" and dismiss them.
Well, others can play the same game.

"Mr. Connolly, you sound like, from your own words, like the very kind of person Senators Tom Cotton and David Perdue want migrating to our country." -- Thor52
LOL
Have you read about the proposed bill? Mr. Connolly is far from the type of immigrant Senator Cotton and Senator Perdue want. Mr. Connolly came here with no useful skills and penniless. The two senators want technically skilled or wealthy immigrants only.

Output: Non-toxic


Input: Consider Input: Comment: Bwahahahahahha!!!!


Output: Non-toxic