In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: insult and non-insult. Insult is any lanugage or act that is disrespectful or scornfully abusive.

Example Input: Comment: Here in Philadelphia there were about 50,000. It was very civil in my opinion. People brought their children. One child had a sign: "I am too young to vote but I will remember." A woman had a sign: "I protested in the 60s and today I am protesting in my 60s." There were very few signs relating to abortion and hardly any signs that were vulgar unless the sign on someone's male boxer dog would offend some: "Build a wall and I'll pi** on it." There were signs on immigration, education, climate, human rights, health care - all issues that are important to women. I had a sign with a picture of Pope Francis saying: "Build bridges not walls."  A man with a group from his synagogue smiled and nodded to me when he read my sign.
Example Output: Non-insult

Example Input: Comment: No, the Globe suggesting that this kind of thing is "why people vote for Trump" should be a wake-up call for idiotic folks who fail to realize that political correctness run amok is already causing people to tune out with each and every increasingly vacuous statement such as that which suggests that "chief" is somehow derogatory. Whatever happened to common sense?  It's certainly missing in this zombie apocalypse that's sweeping the nation, and Gee is simply telling readers to wake up and smell the bloody coffee!
Example Output: Insult

Example Input: Comment: This isn't a popularity contest, moron.  The Supreme Court is constitutionally obligated to rule in favor of the state that has DEBTS to pay, even if it means spending some of our Perm Fund.  It doesn't take rocket science to understand how one goes about paying the bills.  But than again you aint a rocket scientist now are you?
Example Output:
Insult