In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

[EX Q]: Comment: Racist Republican haters rants for the last 8 years:

I lost my keys! Thanks Obama....
My ice cream melted! Thanks Obama....
TV's broken again!!!! Thanks Obama....
Car won't start! Thanks Obama....
Is that a stain on my new shirt?! Thanks Obama...
Rain, again?!! Thanks Obama...
Too much sun! Thanks Obama...
It snowed again last night! Thanks Obama...
My dog pooped on the carpet! Thanks Obama...
My eyes itch! Thanks Obama...
[EX A]: Non-sexual-explicit

[EX Q]: Comment: A QUICK COURSE ON BUTT KISSING COULD HELP BECAUSE WHEN YOU GO TO THE TABLE EMPTY HANDED THE BIGGER GUY HAS THE STICK AND THAT GUY ISN'T JUSTINIAN IS IT ?
[EX A]: Sexual-explicit

[EX Q]: Comment: "Domestic assault cases (physical, not sexual) tend to have quite high acquittal rates because the Crown is pressured to approve charges in weak cases."

If your claim is correct, which I don't doubt, then a similar situation may be contributing to the low conviction rate in sexual assault cases. Where is the pressure coming from?
[EX A]:
Sexual-explicit