In this task, you're given two sentences. Indicate if the first sentence clearly entails the second sentence (i.e., one can conclude the 2nd sentence by reading the 1st one). Indicate your answer with '1' if the first sentence entails the second sentence, otherwise answer with '0'.

Example Input: Sentence 1: Frye says, that he (a homeopathy expert) and Iris Bell recently studied homeopathic treatment of fibromyalgia.  A new analysis - comparing published studies of homeopathic drugs to matched, randomly selected studies of medical drugs - suggests that these apparent homeopathic drug effects are merely placebo effects. Sentence 2: What really irks Frye and other doctors of homeopathy, however, is that homeopathic remedies are not supposed to be used like medical drugs.
Example Output: 0

Example Input: Sentence 1: In late 2006, Aneta Krawczyk accused the party's leader Andrzej Lepper of having offered her political favours for sex in 2001, and then said he had been the father of her youngest child. She said the same of Lepper's close collaborator and MP, Stanislaw Lyzwinski, and accused him of rape and sexual abuse. She also said that Popecki, who had been Lyzwinski's aide, had tried to induce a miscarriage by giving her a labour-inducing drug called oxytocin. Sentence 2: Andrzej Lepper is no longer the Minister of Agriculture and Rural Development.
Example Output: 0

Example Input: Sentence 1: As a result, the elephant has been brought back from the brink of extinction, thanks to the ban on international trade in ivory and other elephant products. Sentence 2: The ban on ivory trade has been effective in protecting the elephant from extinction.
Example Output:
1