We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

Input: Consider Input: This study has been cited by gun proponents before as support for the tempting cross-national assumption that: ���England severely restricts gun possession and sees a rise in robbery rates that now exceeds armed America.���

Output: Valid


Input: Consider Input: Australia, for example, hasn't had one single mass shooting since it passed stricter gun laws over ten years ago.

Output: Valid


Input: Consider Input: Still waiting for a report of an armed citizen or group of armed citizens being involved in something as egregarious as this incident that you cling to and pronounce as a reason to demolish the Second Amendment.


Output: Valid