We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.
--------
Question: Sent1: If individual citizens should not, in your view, be permitted to own firearms, them make your case and let the amendment process work to make your view the law of the land.
 Sent2: If anything, cops will come to where you live to take your guns, seeing as they work for the government.

Answer: Not similar


Question: Sent1: Some people will argue that there should be little or no gun regulation, while others will argue that there should be as much regulation as the courts will allow.
 Sent2: Perhaps if other types of firearms were as strictly regulated as machine guns

Answer: Not similar


Question: Sent1: The PA constitution has provisions for both duty to serve and Right to bear arms, A provision from Address of PA Minority contains defense of state as well as hunting so clearly both individual and collective purposes.
 Sent2: The PA Minority also offered two provisions, one for an unambiguously individual right and another that the state could arm/train militia if Congress neglected.

Answer:
Similar