In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

[EX Q]: Sentence: Joan made sure to thank Susan for all the help she had recieved.
 Reason: The 'she' refers to joan because Joan was thanking Susan for helping her. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
[EX A]: Correct

[EX Q]: Sentence: I couldn't put the pot on the shelf because it was too tall.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the pot because as we're all aware of by now, the pot is a big issue in this game. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
[EX A]: Wrong

[EX Q]: Sentence: Adam can't leave work here until Bob arrives to replace him. If Bob had  left home for work on time, he would be gone by this time.
 Reason: The 'he' refers to adam because Adam was already at work, and Bob was the one that needed to arrive. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
[EX A]:
Correct