We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

Q: In this country, LIB DIM GGs, ( usually the bulk of the anti-gunners ) like to include suicides with murders, when discussing the number of deaths from the misuse of firearms each year.

A: Valid
****
Q: You argue that people cannot be trusted with guns, because they might injure themselves in accidents (hence the 4.46 figure).

A: Valid
****
Q: people against the mal-administration of the government; if we could suppose that in all cases the rights of the people would be attended to, the occasion for guards of this kind would be removed.

A:
Valid
****