In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Q: Comment: What else is to be expected when a non-leader with zero grasp is made chief?
This is just part of the fulfillment; preordained.
Onward it will go. Are we halfway yet? Hopefully, this debacle is a marker on the short, last leg to Trump's demise.

A: Non-obscene
****
Q: Comment: At the moment he chose to pull the trigger, there was -- literally -- no threat, no possibility for "any degree of force" to be used against anyone. 

These aren't just facts - they're uncontradicted facts. The defense is just hoping the jury will ignore the facts by (a) convolution of the time frame so that earlier events are intermixed with later events, (b) pointing to facts unknown and unknowable to the defendant at the time, and (c) insisting that possibilities that are physically impossible could be possible.

That said, I'd be betting on juror nullification of the law in this case. 

But kudos to the prosecutor for not ignoring such a clear-cut, textbook case of cold blooded murder - in El Paso Cty nonetheless! (That fact alone should convince observers of how obvious a crime this was. Prosecuting a Green Beret for executing a scumbag! I'm certain the prosecutor looked for any alternative other than prosecution! Now that is dedication to the law - lady justice with a blindfold.)

A: Non-obscene
****
Q: Comment: It's a false equivalence to say the left has the same level of mendacity as the right. The right has gone off the deep end in the last 20 years, coming to believe that government is evil and must be destroyed ("drowning it in the bathtub").

A:
Non-obscene
****