Given a document, an entity and its sentiment towards the entity, verify if it is the correct sentiment towards the entity. Answer should be yes or no. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

[EX Q]: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Creep Harvey Weinstein is Positive . Two decades ago  the Hollywood producer  Harvey Weinstein  invited Ashley Judd to the Peninsula Beverly Hills hotel for what the young actress expected to be a business breakfast meeting. Instead  he had her sent up to his room  where he appeared in a bathrobe and asked if he could give her a massage or she could watch him shower  she recalled in an interview.
In 2014   Mr. Weinstein  invited Emily Nestor  who had worked just one day as a temporary employee  to the same hotel and made another offer: If she accepted his sexual advances  he would boost her career  according to accounts she provided to colleagues who sent them to Weinstein Company executives. The following year  once again at the Peninsula  a female assistant said  Mr. Weinstein  badgered her into giving  him  a massage while  he  was naked  leaving her âcrying and very distraught â wrote a colleague  Lauren OâConnor  in a searing memo asserting sexual harassment and other misconduct by their boss.
 Harvey  isn't denying the allegations made by a number of women  saying in a statement  "I appreciate the way Iâve behaved with colleagues in the past has caused a lot of pain  and I sincerely apologize for it. Though Iâm trying to do better  I know I have a long way to go."
But  Harvey  isn't just a movie guy   he 's also a massive donor to the Democrat Party. One of  his  big recipients? Hillary Clinton. In fact   he  was a fundraising bundler for her 2016 campaign.
The RNC has called on Democrats who have received "dirty" money from  Weinstein  to return it.
"During three-decades worth of sexual harassment allegations   Harvey Weinstein  lined the pockets of Democrats to the tune of three quarters of a million dollars. If Democrats and the DNC truly stand up for women like they say they do  then returning this dirty money should be a no brainer " RNC Chairwoman Ronna Romney-McDaniel said Friday.
[EX A]: no

[EX Q]: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Bart Fisher is Positive . The top recipient has been Fisher Ranch LLC  the family company of Bart Fisher  a board member and the valleyâs second-largest landowner after Metropolitan. The records show his company has received $27.6 million in annual payments since 2005 for land left fallow.
 Fisher  and other board members say theyâve had no conflicts of interest in these decisions  and their attorney has backed them up. They say the fact that theyâve benefited from the program is the nature of their agencyâs structure as a landowner-voting district. All of the board members are landowners  and theyâre elected by landowners under a voting system in which the largest property owners can cast the largest numbers of votes.
 Fisher  was a leading proponent of the agreement in the early 2000s.  He  said  he  supported it because  he  strongly believed it was in the best long-term interests of landowners and the community.
âThe financial interests of the board were the same as the financial interests of our electorate â  Fisher  said.  He  recalled that Palo Verdeâs attorney advised the board ahead of the vote that they were fine to proceed with the decision.
âThereâs no conflict at PVID at all  because of how we are constituted â  Fisher  said. âOur electorate is whom we serve  and our electorate are landowners.â
Standing beside hay bales on his farm  Palo Verde Irrigation District board member Bart Fisher talks about the agency's lawsuit against the Metropolitan Water District. (Photo: Jay Calderon/The Desert Sun)
When they negotiated the terms of the deal   Fisher  said  the overarching purpose was helping California meet its water needs âwithout diminishing agriculture or our community in the process.â
âI have a vested interest and so do all the landowners in Palo Verde  especially those who participate in the program â  Fisher  said.
Participating farmers received an initial signup bonus of $3 170 per acre. In  Fisher âs case  the records show  his family entities received $6.3 million in initial signup payments.
Having those regular payments can function as a âsafety netâ for farming businesses during hard times and can provide a guarantee to help in getting credit from banks   Fisher  said. That doesnât mean it always pays more than farming  though. Looking back at some years   Fisher  said  farmers would have earned more selling crops than having unplanted fields.
 Fisher  is a third-generation farmer whose family started farming in the Palo Verde Valley in 1917.  He  said the fact that Fisher Ranch has received more from Metropolitan than any other business simply reflects the fact that  his  family has been farming for a century and has gradually expanded its landholdings.
 Fisher  farms more than 11 000 acres  growing hay  wheat  broccoli  cantaloupes and honeydew melons.
 He  said while  his  business receives large sums based on that acreage  it takes a lot of money to run the operation.  Fisher  pointed out that  he  and other growers make huge investments in tractors â which can cost roughly $300 000 each â as well as other equipment. They take out big loans and have large payrolls.
âJust to be in agriculture requires access to vast amounts of capital â  Fisher  said. âNobodyâs getting rich on this program.â
Palo Verde Irrigation District officials â from left  Board Member Jack Seiler   General Manager Ned Hyduke and President Bart Fisher â  talk about why  they  decided to sue Metropolitan Water District. (Photo: Jay Calderon/The Desert Sun)
While considering whether to sue   Fisher  said Palo Verdeâs board members discussed the fact that under the agreement  Metropolitan has the ability to cancel the entire program.
[EX A]: yes

[EX Q]: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Travis Kalanick is Positive . Uber cofounder  Travis Kalanick  appointed Xerox chairwoman Ursula Burns and former Merrill Lynch CEO John Thain to the company's board of directors on Friday  a surprise move that's almost certain to re-ignite the bitter internal fighting that has destabilized the ride-hailing giant for months.
The appointments come a few months after  Kalanick  resigned under pressure from the CEO job at Uber. And the move signals that the hard-charging entrepreneur  who remains on Uber's board  does not intend to fade away from the company he turned into a $69 billion juggernaut built largely in his image.
Uber is reportedly in negotiations for a massive $10 billion investment deal with Japan's Softbank  and Benchmark Capital  one of Uber's largest investors that helped pushed  Kalanick  out  has sought to structure the deal in a way that ensure the former CEO cannot return to power.
In his statement to Business Insider   Kalanick  drops a strong hint that these appointments are a direct refutation of Benchmark's demands.
"I am appointing these seats now in light of a recent Board proposal to dramatically restructure the Board and significantly alter the company's voting rights  " Kalanick  writes. "It is therefore essential that the full Board be in place for proper deliberation to occur  especially with experienced board members as Ursula and John."
The appointments of Burns and Thain fill two board seats controlled by  Kalanick   which have sat vacant until now.  Kalanick 's control over the two seats has been challenged by one of Uber's largest investors  Benchmark Capital.
 Kalanick 's announcement  late on Friday  that he was filling the two seats appears to be a direct challenge to Benchmark  which has sued  Kalanick  for fraud and is attempting to wrest the board seats from his control.
At the core of the Benchmark lawsuit are two seats on the board that  Kalanick  fully controls â meaning  he  can appoint whoever  he  wants to fill them. Benchmark alleges that  Kalanick  promised to relinquishh those seats to independent directors after he resigned in June  but never followed through.
 Kalanick  already has a rough reputation in the court of public opinion after Uber was rocked with so many scandals under his leadership that investors  led by Benchmark  forced him to resign from the CEO role in June. Those scandals also led to the exodus of many other top Uber execs.
 Kalanick  still owns about 10% of the company  including so-called "super-voting shares" that give  him  about 16% of the voting rights of Uber. Meanwhile  new Uber CEO Dara Khosrowshahi has been working hard to repair the company's reputation amid all this drama.
I am confident that    with  their  additions and Daraâs appointment  Uber will be well situated to focus on the future and continue to revolutionize how cities move.
[EX A]:
no