In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: threat and non-threat. Threat is a statement that someone will be hurt or harmed, especially if the person does not do something in particular.

Input: Consider Input: Comment: Yep. Replace those two phrases in this vile piece of crap and you see exactly what type of person wrote this.

Output: Non-threat


Input: Consider Input: Comment: Slap this idiot silly then put her in jail for years.

Output: Threat


Input: Consider Input: Comment: SB91 needs to be revised. It's meant for a good purpose but unfortunately it's failing. Might even be damaging our people. Less jail time without any rehabilitation, means it's going to be repetitive. With an enormous record, these repeat offenders won't be able to work or find a good job, so what are they going to do again? Go back to what they know. On top of that, rehab is crap when there is really no point. They'll get out of rehab whert the support and leadership is slim vs. all the drugs and alcohol in the community...which one will prevail? SB91 should move toward: 1)abstenance(or get the drugs out) 2)rehab and leadership
3)employment
It needs to be focused on guidance. Not an open door that leads no where. That open door needs to lead in the right direction.


Output: Non-threat