instruction:
In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.
question:
Comment: What a rude and ignorant thing to say.
answer:
Non-identity-attack


question:
Comment: Oh, “BIGOTRY!”
Homosexual acts are sinful, and, according to Sacred Scripture, one of the four sins “crying to heaven for vengeance.”  A gay marriage is (un)naturally going to involve said acts.  Are you capable of comprehending this?  The baker doesn’t want to participate in a wedding that promotes this sin.  Now, a bigot is “a person who is obstinately or intolerantly devoted to his or her own opinions and prejudices; [you certainly fit that description to a tee] especially :one who regards or treats the members of a group (such as a racial or ethnic group) with hatred and intolerance.”
The question boils down to obstinacy and intolerance.  Well, when bases his opinion or belief of something as crystal clear as”homosexual behavior is sinful”, is it obstinacy or principled dissent?  And why do you think we should be tolerant of sin?  That certainly isn’t Christ-like, being as that Christ admonished everyone to “sin no more.”  You are the obstinate bigot here, clearly.
answer:
Identity-attack


question:
Comment: Financial experts are wasting their breath warning people about excess debt. People feel entitled to a certain standard of living and will borrow to live in illusory affluence. Then, when reality finally intrudes they'll expect debt forgiveness or even bailouts. Let's be ready to give them a big fat NO! Tell them every penny must be repaid no matter how long it takes. That's right, spendy fools, downscale your life, sell some of your piles of stuff. No thanks for your big spending driving up prices.
answer:

Non-identity-attack