TASK DEFINITION: We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.
PROBLEM: Sent1: DNA technology could be required for the death penalty making it far less likely that an innocent is sentenced to death.
 Sent2: My argument makes it clear that innocent people need not be sentenced to death in order for the death penalty to be unjust.

SOLUTION: Not similar

PROBLEM: Sent1: But why do you have to get rid of them by killing them.
 Sent2: You might say the criminal deserved it, but murder is murder, whether they deserved it or not.

SOLUTION: Not similar

PROBLEM: Sent1: If these are indeed comparable, I wouldn't argue for the death penalty even in murder.
 Sent2: I think the death penalty is an archaic and obsolete form of punishment, even for the crime of murder.

SOLUTION:
Similar