We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gay Marriage) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gay marriage. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gay marriage.

[EX Q]: And NOWHERE in their statements on "legitimate state interest" do they specify ANY requirement that the issue involved not be a "choice".
[EX A]: Valid

[EX Q]: Since people cannot come up with any tangible reason for denying same-sex couples marriage - and same-sex couple can at least quantify the harm of denying them marriage, who do you think wins the argument?
[EX A]: Valid

[EX Q]: You're creating a new "legal entity" who will have new legal status, leading to increased court costs.
[EX A]:
Valid