We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Sent1: If there was another factor associated with the increase in the murder rate and not the death penalty, then the article itself would have pointed it out.
 Sent2: Well according to your own paper, it says that you can't prove that the death penalty increases the murder rate.
Similar

Sent1: Living in jail for life costs less money then the death penalty.
 Sent2: Executing people is costing this country money, lives, and dignity.
Similar

Sent1: Quite a lot of people think that criminals should be punished for the sake of punishing them, whether or not it deters anyone; I had thought you were one of them.
 Sent2: I suppose you could say "well it keeps them from harming society" but so does the death penalty.

Not similar