TASK DEFINITION: Given a passage with a context and an answer, construct a question on the basis of the information present in the passage. Construct the question in such a way that (i) it is unambiguous, (ii) it is answerable from the passage, (iii) its answer is unique (iv) it answer uses text phrases from the passage. Avoid creating questions that (i) can't be answered correctly without actually understanding the passage and (ii) uses the same words or phrases given in the passage.
PROBLEM: Context: Ischemic preconditioning (IPC) mitigates ischemia-reperfusion (I/R) injury in experimental models. However, the clinical significance of this protection has been unclear and a mortality reduction has not been previously reported in noncardiac models. This study examined the local and remote protection afforded by skeletal muscle IPC and sought to determine the significance of this protection on mortality.', "Mice subjected to 2 h hindlimb ischemia/24 h reperfusion (standard I/R injury) were compared with those undergoing a regimen of two 20-min cycles of IPC followed by standard I/R injury. Local injury was assessed via gastrocnemius histology, and remote injury was evaluated via intestinal histology and pulmonary neutrophil infiltration (n = 7). Mortality was compared in parallel groups for 1 week (n = 6). Groups were analyzed using an unpaired Student's t-test for gastrocnemius and pulmonary injury, and a Mann-Whitney rank sum test for intestinal injury. Mortality differences were interpreted through a hazard ratio.", 'Significant protection was observed in preconditioned animals. There was a 35% local injury reduction in skeletal muscle (71.2% versus 46.0%, P < 0.01), a 50% reduction in remote intestinal injury (2.3 versus 1.1, P < 0.01), and a 43% reduction in remote pulmonary injury (14.9 versus 8.5, P < 0.01) compared with standard injury controls. Preconditioned animals were also significantly protected from mortality, demonstrating a 66.7% survival at 1 wk compared with 0% survival after standard injury alone (hazard ratio 0.20, 95% CI: 0.02-0.59).
Answer: We have developed a murine model of IPC that demonstrates local and remote protection against I/R injury, and exhibits significant mortality reduction. This model demonstrates the powerful effect of IPC on local and remote tissues and will facilitate further study of potential mechanisms and therapies.

SOLUTION: Does ischemic preconditioning of skeletal muscle mitigate remote injury and mortality?

PROBLEM: Context: Cardiac overexpression of the β-adrenoreceptor (βAR)-coupled stimulatory G-protein subunit Gαs enhances inotropic responses to adrenergic stimulation and improves survival in mice under βAR blockade. The authors recently identified three common haplotypes in the GNAS gene encoding Gαs, with the greatest Gαs protein expression and signal transduction in haplotype *3 carriers and less in haplotype *2 and *1 carriers. The authors tested the hypothesis that these GNAS variants result in altered mortality in patients after coronary artery bypass graft surgery, particularly in those receiving βAR blockade.', 'This prospective analysis included 1,627 European ancestry patients undergoing primary coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Patients were genotyped for two GNAS haplotype tagging single-nucleotide polymorphisms defining three major haplotypes. Up to 5-yr all-cause mortality was estimated using a Cox proportional hazard model; hazard ratios and 95% CIs were calculated while adjusting for demographics, clinical covariates, and the new EuroSCORE II.', 'Univariate analysis revealed haplotype-dependent 5-yr mortality rates (*1/*1: 18.9%, *2/*1: 13.7%, *2/*2: 9.3%, *3/*1: 10.6%, *3/*2: 9.1%, and *3/*3: 9.6%; P = 0.0006). After adjustment for other predictors of death, homozygote haplotype *1 carriers showed a doubled risk for death (hazard ratio, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.2 to 3.8; P = 0.006). Considering only patients receiving βAR blockers (n = 1,267), the adjusted risk of death even tripled (hazard ratio, 3.0; 95% CI, 1.5 to 6.1; P = 0.002).
Answer: GNAS haplotypes independently associate with an increased risk of death after primary coronary artery bypass graft surgery. These results are most pronounced in patients receiving βAR blockers, strengthening the rationale for personalized treatment, to decrease medication side effects and improve outcomes.

SOLUTION: Do gNAS gene variants affect β-blocker-related survival after coronary artery bypass grafting?

PROBLEM: Context: We tested the hypothesis that the negative functional effects of cyclic GMP would be attenuated by cyclic AMP and this interaction would be reduced in pacing-induced failure of hypertrophic hearts.', '8-Bromo-cGMP (2 microg/kg/min) was infused into a coronary artery in eight control, eight ventricular hypertrophy (HYP), and eight hypertrophic failure (HYP-FAIL) dogs. Then isoproterenol (0.1 microg/kg/min) was infused, followed by 8 Br-cGMP. Regional myocardial work (force*shortening/min), and O(2) consumption (VO(2)) (coronary blood flow*O(2) extraction) were measured. Cyclic GMP levels were determined by radioimmunoassay.', '8-Br-cGMP significantly decreased regional work from 3812 +/- 839 g*mm/min by 17% and VO(2) by 29% in control, but not in HYP (1073 +/- 182 by -10%, VO(2) by -16%) or HYP-FAIL (495 +/- 145 by -9%, VO(2) by 0%). Isoproterenol increased work by 43% and VO(2) by 48% in controls and in HYP (work by 54%, VO(2) by 39%), but not in HYP-FAIL (work by -28%, VO(2) by -5%). Subsequently, 8-Br-cGMP had no effect on work or VO(2) in control (-2%, -13%), HYP (-12%, -30%), or HYP-FAIL (+13%, +14%). Cyclic AMP levels were elevated by isoproterenol in control (381 +/- 115 versus 553 +/- 119 pmol/g) and HYP (313 +/- 55 versus 486 +/- 227), but not in HYP-FAIL (300 +/- 60 versus 284 +/- 126). After isoproterenol, 8-Br-cGMP further elevated cyclic AMP in control (687 +/- 122), but not in HYP or HYP-FAIL.
Answer: In controls, cyclic AMP attenuated cyclic GMPs negative functional and metabolic effects. The effects and the interaction were blunted in the HYP and HYP-FAIL groups.

SOLUTION:
Does heart failure reduce both the effects and interaction between cyclic GMP and cyclic AMP?