In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: insult and non-insult. Insult is any lanugage or act that is disrespectful or scornfully abusive.

Example Input: Comment: The 'Mooch' may have won A personal victory, but I have to wonder how much of A win it was for us in the huddled mass' community. Having two pi$$ed off political hacks (RNC/DNC, makes no diff) now able to drive MORE nails in the Republican coffin is truly A dubious 'victory'........................
Example Output: Non-insult

Example Input: Comment: Good comments, Monica.
 
I imagine you'll agree that the discussion about who might be the first gay saint presupposes a fairly modern paradigm about sexual orientation. The norm throughout most of history has been for a somewhat flexible line. It's doubtful that Paul -- or most of the sacred authors, for that matter -- even thought in terms of  'straightness' or 'gayness,' but rather in terms of what they perceived as moral or immoral actions.

Regarding RC bishops, it seems that these days intellectual curiosity is not high on the list of qualifications. There are plenty of intellectually curious priests (well, some anyway), but they tend to get weeded out well before they rise to the level of the episcopacy, sad to say.
Example Output: Non-insult

Example Input: Comment: Dumb.
Example Output:
Insult