We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

[EX Q]: Sent1: If the CDC states that the ban was ineffective, then it should be a given that bans do NOT work.
 Sent2: If the D.C. gun ban was ineffective because illegal guns were leaking into D.C. from other states that would be an argument for having more gun control in other states.
[EX A]: Not similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: I don`t reallly see the inconsistency unless you view the right to keep andbear arms as a right that should be protected.
 Sent2: This makes sense when you consider that the second amendment protects the right of the people to bear arms in connection with an organized militia.
[EX A]: Not similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: Gun registration schemes have been disabled for criminals because requiring them to register a gun they are forbidden to own would violate their 5th Amendment rights.
 Sent2: if guns were banned things such like amo&things;used to build guns would be banned to so how could they build their own?????
[EX A]:
Not similar