We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

[EX Q]: Sent1: If you apply that cost to the rest of the nation�۪s executions, the nation has spent over $1 billion on capital punishment since the reinstatement of the penalty via Gregg vs. Georgia in 1976.
 Sent2: On a national basis, these figures translate to an extra cost of over $1 billion spent since 1976 on the death penalty.
[EX A]: Similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: Only .06% of people who have killed kill again when they escape, are released, etc.
 Sent2: If it must be, then we shall find a way to improve these peoples habits, not kill them because they aren't 'like us'.
[EX A]: Not similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: The death penalty is gives the ability to off killers and murderers, as, if they were given life in parole, they have the ability to escape and continue their crimes.
 Sent2: So, when someone gets the death penalty, they chose their own fate by committing the crime.
[EX A]:
Not similar