In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: insult and non-insult. Insult is any lanugage or act that is disrespectful or scornfully abusive.

[EX Q]: Comment: Zinke is an idiot.  There is no safe lead exposure level for children.  Even the tiniest amounts are toxic- and reduce IQ.  Our congressional delegation must have been exposure to lots of lead when they were kids.
[EX A]: Insult

[EX Q]: Comment: They broadcast PHONY REPORTS DAILY.

That's what they do, ON PURPOSE.

They INTENTIONALLY MISLEAD THEIR IGNORANT VIEWERS.
[EX A]: Insult

[EX Q]: Comment: "The platform calls for ending violence against women, workers' rights, reproductive rights, environmental justice, immigrant rights and more."  Why weren't these protested for under Obama?  Nothing has changed.

So many of the things being protested against are because of the "facts" sent out by the social media.  Opportunities for change and progress still exist, and will continue to do so.  Using statements made years ago to currently define a person's present attitudes is neither accurate nor understandable.  But I guess all of these damning Trump never said or did anything long ago that they regret now.

The fact that half the voters preferred HRC and are unhappy is understandable.  However, in other close national elections, the adults took the results, accepted the outcome, and moved on.  Very few incidents of adults acting like spoiled brats who didn't get their way.  But that's the way libs tend to be--anyone who disagrees with them is totally wrong and nothing but scum.
[EX A]:
Insult