In this task, you're given a statement, and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence clearly disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3' corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.

[Q]: Statement: Critics' principal target is the company's policy of pegging doctors' investment returns to profits at Columbia/HCA-affiliated institutions. Choices:  1. Critics do not aim at the company's policy of pegging doctors' investment returns to profits. 2. Critics aim at the company's policy of pegging doctors' investment returns to profits. 3. Critics aim at the company's policy of pegging doctors' investment returns to profits, said the economists.
[A]: 1


[Q]: Statement: She became an assistant professor in 1983. Choices:  1. She was an assistant professor. 2. She has been in the field for long. 3. She was an assistant professor in 1980.
[A]: 3


[Q]: Statement: For example, the President has made financial management improvement a top priority and established a goal to obtain an unqualified opinion on the government's financial statements. Choices:  1. The president doesn't care about financial management.  2. An unqualified opinion of the government's financial documents give officials an unbiased perspective. 3. The president made it a goal to get an unqualified opinion of the government's financial documents.
[A]:
1