In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Comment: I am not assuming that she is lying or that she is telling the truth.  A photo shows a hand behind her it does not show it on her ass and it certainly doesn't show it on her bare ass... In fact it shows the opposite as the skirt would most definitely look different than it does if the back of it were being lifted AND he would have to be a freaking contortionist to touch a bare ass from that 'position' of his arm without lifting the skirt.  So I find Swifts claim of grabbing her 'bare ass' to be not only not credible but ludicrous.  And since 100% of the testimony wasn't that anyone else saw it but that Taylor Swift 'SAID' that it happened, well thats not enough evidence to do anything.  Now if she said that he grabbed her ass and not insisted that he grabbed her bare ass.. well then she has a more credible story at that point. IF that were the claim then I think she has at least a 50/50 chance of winning as it is she has 0.  Neither of these two deserve anything special.
Sexual-explicit

Comment: Facts must burn your ass everyday. It must be tough to be you.  I feel for ya'.  Now, sit down , relax, get a foot rub and take a chill pill.  Unless course its that time of the month and your hormones are raging.
Sexual-explicit

Comment: Pedophiles love Alaska! 
We have politicians who make life easy for pedophiles to exist and thrive. For example Senator Dunleavey from Wasilla proposed we eliminate teaching our children health education in our schools. Basically the most basic biological education of our reproductive organs. Which was already a parental choice to let or not let your kid learn about physiciologial human reproductive organs. Oh the horror if let our child know about their bodies but a pedophiles dream! Keeping the kiddos clueless. Gotta love Dunleavey for wanting our children to be uneducated about their bodies. Right? Not. But I'm sure the predatory behavior of a pedophile took notice. 

Then there is that issue of limits for how long a person can be on the sex offender list. Basically a 40 yr old who was busted for raping a 10 year old, only has to be on the list for 15 yrs. Think about that the next time you do a search for sex offenders in your area. 

Dunleavey, a pedophiles dream candidate.

Sexual-explicit