In this task, you will be presented with a context from an academic paper and you have to write an answerable question based on the context. Your questions can be extractive, abstractive, or yes-no questions.
--------
Question: The policies trained with the NUS achieved an average success rate (SR) of 94.0% and of 96.6% when tested on the ABUS and the NUS, respectively.

Answer: by how much did nus outperform abus?


Question: When evaluating classifiers it is common to use accuracy, precision and recall as well as Hamming loss.  It has been shown that when calculating precision and recall on multi-label classifiers, it can be advantageous to use micro averaged precision and recall BIBREF6 . The formulas for micro averaged precision are expressed as DISPLAYFORM0 DISPLAYFORM1

Answer: what evaluation metrics are discussed?


Question: We evaluate our model and baseline models on three versions of the dataset. The first one (Inc) only considers the original data, containing naturally incorrect tweets, and achieves accuracy of 80$\%$ against BERT's 72$\%$. The second version (Corr) considers the corrected tweets, and shows higher accuracy given that it is less noisy. 

Answer:
Should their approach be applied only when dealing with incomplete data?