In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.

[EX Q]: Comment: Trump is advocating for Supremacy; the Suspremacy of....AMERICANS. It is the left; the democrats, the communists like Hillary and Obama who continue to break and fracture AMERICANS into tiny little controllable groups; minorities; minions eventually; victims always. Such a sad reality for the strong conservatives in the USA. Canadians are being subjected to the exact same
Divisive tactics brought on by the liberals and socialists and communists.
[EX A]: Disagree

[EX Q]: Comment: I agree. YOU PROTEST ON YOUR OWN TIME. WHEN YOUR IN THAT CHAMBER, YOU REPRESENT YOUR CONSTITUENTS, NOT YOUR PERSONAL AGENDA. YOUR KNEELING DOESN'T DO ANYTHING BUT GETS YOUR NAME IN THE NEWSPAPER. If you want to make a statement and change something, "adopt a homeless person" and change their life for the better. Our Anchorage Assembly must be pre-testing the local cannabis.
[EX A]: Agree

[EX Q]: Comment: This insane!  Canada contributes 1.8% of the world's GHG emissions, but our vast forests consume much more than that. Canada is not a net emitter of CO2.

If this proposal had any chance of changing the course or changing the pace of climate change, this might make sense.  But with no evidence that it will, (remember "evidence-based decision making?") we can't stand by and watch Trudeau euthanise our economy simply for symbolism.

We have to get rid of this clown of a PM.
[EX A]:
Agree