Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.

[Q]: OMG yes!  Let's put back the old A&W ..........  gosh our communities problems back then were SO simple......
[A]: No


[Q]: They spend too many hours making all those re-election phone calls. They cannot work on the business at hand or much less work for the people.  Senator "Koch" aka. Sullivan cannot be bothered with things like working for Alaskans.  He slams Obama but is the first in line greeting him when the President visits Alaska.  What a phony!
[A]: Yes


[Q]: Robert  , I do have a difficult time following your posts.  you tie things together and without giving any foundation for us not in the know as to your references. can you  slow down some - remember-  you must teach us as 4th or 5th graders - that is the common "age" that advertising aims for...   you say you got 22% of vote for mayor in riddle?  yes?  that is pretty good for little exposure or money  - congrats.. you are the anti-trump.*** why the deep  interest in the glenwood area?*** RD via RG: " “Vetting” aside..."  one can't put vetting aside, it is the part of the foundation and basis of decision.
[A]:
No