We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Input: Consider Input: Sent1: Only .06% of people who have killed kill again when they escape, are released, etc.
 Sent2: So as long as only some innocent people are killed for crimes they didn't commit then the system must be sound.

Output: Not similar


Input: Consider Input: Sent1: Since I am not related to any death-row-inmate's victims (of murder, rape, molestation), I do not classify my desire to see them dead as vengeance.
 Sent2: If I heard of an innocent stranger being brutally killed, I might want to see the perpetrator suffer because of the suffering of the victim - that is VENGEANCE pure and simple.

Output: Not similar


Input: Consider Input: Sent1: The crime rate was higher after the death penalty than before it.
 Sent2: BUT it is not apparent that death penalty lower crime rate.


Output: Similar