In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

[EX Q]: Comment: What's gonna change on the repubs agenda. They've been doing nothing for 8 yrs, what's 4 more gonna matter.
Do nothing repub congress,  all preachy and wanna get into women's vaginas & reproductive rights.  While your base of ol white guys die off what's plan B for 2020.
[EX A]: Sexual-explicit

[EX Q]: Comment: This might sound harsh and I'm ok with you thinking so... Here is my thought on what Masuma Khan had to say about the white people who can kiss her ass. It goes as follows...
Words right out of a terrorist's mouth!!
Masuma Khan posts on Facebook... "White fragility can kiss my ass. Your white tears aren't sacred, your land is." This doesn't sound very Canadian to me, sounds more like the threat of a terrorist. We, real true Canadians, don't take kindly to threats... You think we are frail - we have a surprise for you! Watch out white people - this woman will stab you in the back without thinking twice.
She should not just face disciplinary action for her racist remark... she should be put on the "Terrorist Watch List". What she said was a direct threat to the white race .. who are we kidding??
Her words are no different than those of the ISIS terrorist's who post their threats to the World Cup...
At least we white's know who our friends are .. definitely not her.
KICK HER OUT!!
[EX A]: Sexual-explicit

[EX Q]: Comment: Chuckie Schmuck at it again. Another of HiLIARy's playmates can't handle the truth. Born loser
[EX A]:
Non-sexual-explicit