We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

Ex Input:
His classes are required coursework, which means that a whole new generation of lawyers, thousands each year, come out of UCLA knowing beyond a doubt that the second amendment is an individual right.

Ex Output:
Valid


Ex Input:
So it seems that in the case of DC the justification for protecting the right to bear arms is lacking.

Ex Output:
Valid


Ex Input:
Please see other threads regarding the cost overrun of gun registration in Canada.

Ex Output:

Valid