In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.
--------
Question: Comment: Ummm NO!  But nice way to frame your answer so no matter what we say against this utter bullshit..you can shake your head in phoney support like "its ok we know you cant say cuz your man is holding you down".  That in itself is enough to not vote for your corrupt ass because basically your saying im weak!  Ide like to get these weak hands around your neck if that says anything.

Answer: Obscene


Question: Comment: That's a nice story, except that it's not true.  I was very surprised when I heard Kershaw wasn't starting.  Like I said, Darvish looked like crap in game 3, and his eyes looked lost.  No way I would have started him in a game 7 with Kershaw available.  And again, the metrics on Darvish vs. the Astros are pretty astounding.  Frankly, I wouldn't even have put Darvish on the roster for the WS, given his history with the Astros.

Answer: Obscene


Question: Comment: You have never questioned Lynch's mental aptitude or his work ethic? And you have never repeated the Kiz outrage about his telephone?
How do you even post such lies -- never mind I know, with the new system I can't go back and find your lies. 
We ( that would be you, I and everyone else) knows what you have posted in the past.

Answer:
Non-obscene