In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: threat and non-threat. Threat is a statement that someone will be hurt or harmed, especially if the person does not do something in particular.

[EX Q]: Comment: Seriously?

Cassandra, defending the indefensible one foolish comment at a time...
[EX A]: Non-threat

[EX Q]: Comment: You may be right.
I can't think of anyone else: Bernie's too old and too left for some, Nancy may seem too strident and in any case she's even older.
[EX A]: Non-threat

[EX Q]: Comment: More proof that creeps and sexual abusers come from all stripes.

Just weird to me that one group in our country gives them a seat at the table, while everyone else seems more interested in upholding decency by ostracising them.

C'mon Republicans: stand up for those morals you always pay lip service to and boot this guy out. Put in someone who is just as cooky, just not one who preyed on underage girls. It's not as if whoever fills in for him won't win. Alabama will give the seat to an (R) either way, but wouldn't you feel less dirty knowing your party doesn't give power and esteem to someone you can't trust to be around your kids?
[EX A]:
Non-threat