We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Example Input: Sent1: At the time the constitution was written, the militia, which was to be armed with privately owned weapons, was supposed to be our nations primary military force.
 Sent2: It was felt by many (not all) at the time that such weapons were not military weapons and thus did not fall under the protection of the Second Amendment or the right to bear arms in their own state constitutions.
Example Output: Not similar

Example Input: Sent1: If today we were to ban guns all the law abiding citizens would give up their firearms and protection.
 Sent2: Law abiding citizens obey the law, there can surely be no reason to prohibit them form having guns.
Example Output: Not similar

Example Input: Sent1: (i.e. restrictions on concealed carry, laws against brandishing) but we can not ban the carrying of arms altogether since that would violate the second amendment.
 Sent2: Why can a state attach limits "in their own individual RKBA" (such as prohibited concealed carry) that supercede the second amendment- unless the second amendment does not protect concealed carry.
Example Output:
Not similar