Given a paragraph about movies and a set of conversational questions and answers about the paragraph, say whether the passage contains sufficient information to answer the follow-up question. Say Yes if it is answerable; otherwise, say No. The paragraph has the prefix 'CONTEXT:'. Each conversation question has a prefix `Q:` followed by the answer prefix `A:`, and the follow-up question has a prefix `FOLLOWUP_Q:`.

Ex Input:
CONTEXT: She doesn't want to torture Sherlock, she wants to play with him. Specifically, she wants him to play with her. At least, that's what the childhood version of herself wants and it manifests in modern day as the torturous puzzling she sets up for Sherlock. Eurus lacks human emotion and, thus, doesn't see what she does as torturing her brother.  <sep>  Q: What is Eurus's motive in the final problem A: She doesn't want to torture Sherlock, she wants to play with him. Specifically, she wants him to play with her  Q: Were they friends as children? A: that's what the childhood version of herself wants and it manifests in modern day as the torturous puzzling she sets up for Sherlock  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Does she kill redbeard?

Ex Output:
Yes


Ex Input:
CONTEXT: Keeping in mind what we now know (that the monster is The Man In Black), we can only speculate at what John actually saw. Each person who saw the smoke monster presumably saw more than just a large cloud of smoke - they saw some kind of vision in the monster (if memory serves, this is what happened with Mr. Eko for example). What John saw probably affected him in a way that he wanted to keep whatever vision he saw to himself.  <sep>  Q: Why didn't Locke say he saw the monster? A: What John saw probably affected him in a way that he wanted to keep whatever vision he saw to himself  Q: Why do you think John wanted to do this? A: we can only speculate at what John actually saw  Q: Can you shed any other light on his motives or his background? A: Each person who saw the smoke monster presumably saw more than just a large cloud of smoke - they saw some kind of vision in the monster  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: What about the monster, is there some deeper meaning there?

Ex Output:
Yes


Ex Input:
CONTEXT: Stupid? Not at all. The FBI tells Sonny Black that Donnie was an agent, to let them know that the FBI can infiltrate them at will. This will create suspicion for every new member going forward, and the whole idea is to break down the walls of trust so they'll rat on each other. It's actually a quite brilliant move on the FBI's part.  <sep>  Q: In the film Donnie Brasco, why did the FBI tell the mafia that Donnie was an undercover agent? A: to let them know that the FBI can infiltrate them at will  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Thanks. I also need to ask, why does the FBI seem stupid enough to do that? Actually it seems smart to me, but do you have an answer to that question?

Ex Output:

Yes