In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: threat and non-threat. Threat is a statement that someone will be hurt or harmed, especially if the person does not do something in particular.

Comment: Imagine allowing terrorists cancel the I-phone over concerns it could cause cancer.  We would not know the advantages and we could never learn if it is possible to mitigate the disadvantages.  

It is too bad these self-righteous terrorists feel they need to shut down education because of fear.  Possibly they could open their minds, shut their hate speech and participate in learning.

Nah, this is the time of Progressive Terrorists.  We don't need no stink'n Constitution or fairness for all.
Non-threat

Comment: don't fool yourself he is elbow deep in that puppet more often than not.
Non-threat

Comment: I think I can grasp your feelings quite well. A woman makes some bad choices, putting her in this horrific gang rape situation, "Well it's her fault. She shouldn't have gotten drunk and left willingly with them. She should've known she'd be gang raped." If you were to look back at what you said and compared it to what you say you "feel", don't you agree that you're being hypocritical? Just saying the obvious. Victim blaming is victim blaming is victim blaming. There are no ifs or buts.

Non-threat