In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

Sentence: I poured water from the bottle into the cup until it was empty.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the bottle because because that is where the water was coming from and the cup was filling up. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Correct

Sentence: The painting in Mark's living room shows an oak tree. It is to the right of the bookcase.
 Reason: The 'It' refers to the painting because The sentence describes the painting, so you assume the oak tree is next to a house. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Wrong

Sentence: Archaeologists have concluded that humans lived in Laputa 20,000 years ago. They hunted for evidence on the river banks.
 Reason: The 'They' refers to archaeologists because Archaeologists wouldn't likely be the ones hunting for deer. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

Wrong