We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

[EX Q]: Sent1: Even though you deny it, your statements show you have no problem executing innocent people.
 Sent2: You have just shown your position why we should use the death penalty, but i have not seen the solution for people who are making crime?
[EX A]: Not similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: The death penalty has not been shown to be more effective than life imprisonment in deterring murder, hence we should choose life imprisonment.
 Sent2: A life sentence does not prevent a murderer from murdering again.
[EX A]: Not similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: The Death penalty does not work because the kind of people that murder will not stop and think of the consequences before their actions.
 Sent2: There has been so much cases of people who have been executed, only to be found innocent after their death.
[EX A]:
Not similar