In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence can be inferred from the statement. Incorrect choices change the meaning in important ways or have details that are not mentioned in the statement. Indicate your answer as 1,2, or 3 corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.

Ex Input:
Statement: Another refreshing feature of Goodman's storytelling is that, unlike other members of fundamentalist sects one might find in novels, her characters don't chafe at their restrictions, or not too much. Choices:  1. Goodman's characters failing to question their restrictions is frustrating to read. 2. The fact that Goodman's characters in fundamental sects don't generally feel too restricted by the rules of their sects is a unique aspect of Goodman's storytelling. 3. The common novel story line that has members of fundamentalist sects yearning for freedom has become overused and stale.

Ex Output:
2


Ex Input:
Statement: Against the weight of all our knowledge, do you think you could become our master that easily?  Hanson had his own doubts. Choices:  1. Given the weight of all our knowledge, can you be our leader? 2. Do you think you have what it takes to be our master? 3. Given that we know so little, couldn't you become our master?

Ex Output:
1


Ex Input:
Statement: It may also have taken time for women to perceive the increased willingness of men to leave them if they demanded marriage. Choices:  1. Women thought men were more willing to leave them if they wanted to get married within the first year. 2. Women thought men were more willing to leave them if they wanted to get married. 3. Women thought men were more willing to leave them if they didn't want to get married.

Ex Output:

2