instruction:
In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.
question:
Comment: No, we don't have to "agree to disagree." It's just something trite people like to say. (Note you didn't even agree but went on arguing your opinion with, of all things, an appeal to your ignorance.)

As for the appeal to cite "any person nationally," you haven't even cited anyone so bugger off already. (Note, nor would it matter as it's all just silly opinion anyway.)

I repeat, shake things up a bit and hire Kaepernick as the quarterback.
answer:
Non-identity-attack


question:
Comment: Another Muslim jerk, amazing how Alaska has changed in the past 30 yrs. or so, look all low lifes that are allowed to come here and comment murder, but that's okay. we have a house full of jerks sitting in Juneau allowing this to happen.
answer:
Identity-attack


question:
Comment: Great comments on customer service, I live in Burlington where the Mayor refuses to deal directly with the public and Councillors can use foul language with the public without censure. 

Mr. Henry please move west, we need someone with vision and courage here to replace to current crop of overpaid, coddled dullards.
answer:

Non-identity-attack