Given a paragraph about movies and a set of conversational questions and answers about the paragraph, say whether the passage contains sufficient information to answer the follow-up question. Say Yes if it is answerable; otherwise, say No. The paragraph has the prefix 'CONTEXT:'. Each conversation question has a prefix `Q:` followed by the answer prefix `A:`, and the follow-up question has a prefix `FOLLOWUP_Q:`.

[EX Q]: CONTEXT: I don't have a source but I am fairly certain, Daenerys didn't know about Jon visiting Tyrion in the cell because of the later scene with her and Jon and her reaction to Jon asking mercy for Tyrion. Then the question comes, why did Unsullied let Jon through. We saw in S08E05 that Tyrion managed to see Jaime after convincing the guarding Unsullied that he has a higher authority then the person they possibly got their orders from. They have seen Jon by her side when she's standing on King's Landing steps and proclaiming her victory and further conquest. So they know he is a close ally to her. They must have gotten their orders from Grey Worm or some other officers to guard the prisoner but when they see Jon, a close ally of Dany and a Commander of the Northern forces, they let him through because they know he has a higher authority and possibly Queen's confidence in the visit  <sep>  Q: Did the queen allow Jon to visit Tyrion?
[EX A]: Yes

[EX Q]: CONTEXT: George 'Babyface' Nelson is Achilles. You can read about it in Achilles and Baby Face Nelson: Modernization of Character in O Brother, Where Art Thou? by Carrie A. Alhelm-Sizelove. Nelson, like Achilles, is a person who fights for his ego and to gain fame. As Achilles fought in the Trojan war for fame, George is robbing banks during the Great Depression not to help the poor people but to get known. There is no deeper motive behind their doing. And George's Achilles' heel is his baby face.  <sep>  Q: Does Babyface Nelson represent anyone from The Odyssey? A: George 'Babyface' Nelson is Achilles  Q: What else can you tell me about this character or achilles? A: elson, like Achilles, is a person who fights for his ego and to gain fame  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: What does Achilles go on to do in the film?
[EX A]: Yes

[EX Q]: CONTEXT: NOTE: OBSA (One Big Spoiler Alert) His character relied on common sense of all seamen, as he saw it. There are several instances throughout the movie where his character makes statements to his crew as to why he's doing things the way he is, which, while unpopular at the outset, made sense and was bought into after the explanation. He used this same common sense seamanship to bring the conclusion which happened. With the ending, he took a gamble, relying on his instincts as a veteran of the seas. He didn't know the Russian ship was going to fire on the base, but was hoping for some kind of resolution which didn't require his boat to fire. While he was given the order to fire from Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Donnegan, he knew it would create bigger issues and further hostilities. Having the Russian Captain Andropov onboard and believing in him was a good step towards making this happen. Without Andropov, it probably wouldn't have turned out the same way. He trusted the Captain to help him and hoped the Captain trusted him in the same way. Andropov's intervention with the crew of the Russian vessel allowed him the best course of action. It wasn't that he forced someone else to fire, he only hoped it would happen without his having to do it. In the end, everything worked out for the best (ex machina?).  <sep>  Q: How did Gerard Butler resolve the ending of Hunter Killer? A: With the ending, he took a gamble, relying on his instincts as a veteran of the seas  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: How was Bulter's character able to get the warship to fire the missiles?
[EX A]:
Yes