In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

[Q]: Comment: Such is the ways in which we have decided as a society as to how we we deal with misfits; those who march to the beat of another drum; those we can "put away" for not following the "norms" that have been established; those who are annoyingly bothersome; those who can't follow the rules; those with some find of deficiencies deemed difficult to handle, etc.  Do we consider these means to be the most effective and successful ways in dealing with these "problems"?  Sure doesn't seem like it, but, we seem to go on our merry way heading in this direction.  How come?
[A]: Non-identity-attack


[Q]: Comment: Except with Islam where women are treated like property and beat and stoned and whatever.
[A]: Identity-attack


[Q]: Comment: Jennifer Rubin knows nothing of history. Jennifer invents a brand new history when she writes Republicans have:

"...become the party of the Enemies of Lincoln."

Jennifer Rubin does not understand that Lincoln was a vile racist.  Lincoln's own words illustrates the depth of his racism:

Two Lincoln Quotes:

"Our republican system was meant for a homogeneous people. As long as blacks continue to live with the whites they constitute a threat to the national life. Family life may also collapse and the increase of mixed breed basxxrds may some day challenge the supremacy of the white man."

"I have no purpose to introduce political and social equality between the white and black races. There is physical difference between the two which, in my judgment, will probably forever forbid their living together..."

Lincoln said even worse in the forth of the Lincoln- Douglas debates.
[A]:
Identity-attack