You are given two sentences. You have to find if there is entailment or agreement of the Hypothesis by the Premise. From the given pair of sentences, you should identify if there is enough information in the Premise to support the claim made in the Hypothesis. The Premise may not exactly be the same as Hypothesis. Your task is to return 'entails' if the premise supports hypothesis else return 'neutral'.

[Q]: Premise: Because of the tetrahedral configuration of electron pairs around singly bonded carbon, many different three-dimensional structures can be achieved by carbon-carbon bonding. 
 Hypothesis: In a carbon triple bond, three pairs of electrons are shared.
[A]: neutral


[Q]: Premise: The footprints are best viewed as 'ecological snapshots' of resource use in time. 
 Hypothesis: High per capita use of resources means the ecological footprint of the united states is large.
[A]: neutral


[Q]: Premise: A large nuclear-powered ship with more than one reactor, designed for years of service without refueling, can have nearly as much long-lived radioactivity (e.g., 90Sr) on board as an operating commercial reactor (Rickover, 1980). 
 Hypothesis: The long-lived isotopes require thousands of years to decay to a safe level in a nuclear reactor.
[A]:
neutral