In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

[Q]: Comment: I understand you may not have the ability to read these posts and understand the point...Her entire thesis is wrong. Quackery is quackery. Get an education and then we can continue-until then crawl back in your troll cave.
[A]: Non-obscene


[Q]: Comment: Laughable how your dick is orange from jerking off to your own stupidity ...
[A]: Obscene


[Q]: Comment: Jesus does not forgive the woman. He said "Neither do I condemn you." which is a different way of extending mercy. It is hard to read that as commanding her to change her behavior. The rigor you see depends entirely on "sin no more" which might be taken in a number of ways.
In any event, I dont think anyone would say "I don't condemn you" is "rigorist." It sounds pretty lax to me.
[A]:
Non-obscene