We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Input: Consider Input: If there was a justice system that was equally fair to all accused, made no mistakes and only executed the guilty, proponents of the death penalty could rightly cry, "Fry 'um up".

Output: Valid


Input: Consider Input: Elections aren't supposed to be proof beyond reasonable doubt that the person on suited to the job, just the opinion of the electors.

Output: Invalid


Input: Consider Input: Yes, because death penalty will really make people think more deeply before kill somebody or steal something.


Output: Valid