In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine the neutral choice based on your inference from the statement and your commonsense knowledge. The neutral choice is a sentence that neither agrees nor disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3', corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence. If sentence X agrees with sentence Y, one's correctness follows from the other one. If sentence X disagrees with sentence Y, they can not be correct at the same time.

Example Input: Statement: Why not just abolish all the laws that are supposed to protect These folk; because if you do not have legal services, the laws are unenforceable and useless. Choices: 1. These folk need legal services to protect them. 2. There is no way to enforce the laws with no legal services. 3. The people can protect themselves against the law.
Example Output: 1

Example Input: Statement: The legislative history contains no evidence that Congress believed it was limiting legal representation of H-2A workers to the period when such workers were physically present in the United States. Choices: 1. There is no history that has evidence that Congress oppressed the workers. 2. There is a lot of legislative history backing up the limited legal representation. 3. Some people believe the H-2A workers were not treated with respect.
Example Output: 3

Example Input: Statement: Deep valleys with babbling brooks and wooded copses give shelter to the small Lakeland communities. Choices: 1. The Lakeland communities were reliant upon the small streams of water running through their valleys. 2. There were no communities able to flourish in this area. 3. The Lakeland communities built their homes next to streams, among the trees.
Example Output:
3