TASK DEFINITION: In this task, you will be presented with a context from an academic paper and you have to write an answerable question based on the context. Your questions can be extractive, abstractive, or yes-no questions.
PROBLEM: In the future, we aim to use the corpus for annotation projects such as parts-of-speech tagging, named entity recognition. Furthermore, the generated word embeddings will be utilized for the automatic construction of Sindhi WordNet.

SOLUTION: Are trained word embeddings used for any other NLP task?

PROBLEM: Without ELMo (the same setting as 4-th row in Table 3 ), our data settings is the same as qin-EtAl:2017:Long whose performance was state-of-the-art and will be compared directly. We see that even without the pre-trained ELMo encoder, our performance is better, which is mostly attributed to our better sentence pair representations.

SOLUTION: Why does their model do better than prior models?

PROBLEM: Our annotation scheme introduces opportunities for the educational community to conduct further research on the relationship between features of student talk, student learning, and discussion quality. Once automated classifiers are developed, such relations between talk and learning can be examined at scale. Also, automatic labeling via a standard coding scheme can support the generalization of findings across studies, and potentially lead to automated tools for teachers and students.  The development of an annotation scheme explicitly designed for this problem is the first step towards collecting and annotating corpora that can be used by the NLP community to advance the field in this particular area.

SOLUTION:
what opportunities are highlighted?