TASK DEFINITION: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: toxic and non-toxic. Toxicity is defiend as anything that is rude, disrespectful, or unreasonable that would make someone want to leave a converation.
PROBLEM: Comment: Kids only speaking when spoken to?   It sounds like you think that is a good thing, correct?

SOLUTION: Non-toxic

PROBLEM: Comment: Excuse me you terrorist! You are in Canada! You will never be judged according to your false bible here! You don't like it? Leave. And don't let the door hit your ass on the way out!!!

SOLUTION: Toxic

PROBLEM: Comment: This is a one billion dollar blunder, and yet the newspaper is not naming names?

Are you kidding me, Globe and Mail?

The article says it is all about Ottawa, that the federal government there in 1965 allowed Ontario to apply a new child welfare method to native folks, that Ottawa's agreement explicitly said individual bands had to be consulted first, but that did not happen, nor were the kids given information about their aboriginal heritage, nor was information about benefits told to native kids, thus the legal system this year forcing Ottawa to pay massive damages.

And the newspaper is not naming any names of those politicians who messed up in the above steps?

A billion dollars of taxpayer money to fix a government-made mess, but not a single responsible politician's name typed out in the news report?

I ask my question again, are you kidding me, Globe and Mail?

SOLUTION:
Non-toxic