In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Comment: Which part of "I'm a priest, and you are not" do you have difficulty understanding, Pandora?

Once again, you leap to the defense of a priest who is being a jerk.
Non-sexual-explicit

Comment: as RUSTY THE HATED SCREECHING MONEY SUCKING RAIL REARS ITS UGLY HEAD STILL AGAIN & AGAIN & AGAIN. Are we ( the tax payers) blind to whats going on here. Call Today and voice your opinion also e-mail and do it today
Sexual-explicit

Comment: Wasn't it just yesterday that she said  she doesn't want a new election?? Oh no, pardon me that was a week ago. 

“I don’t want an election,” she told Global News in an exclusive one-on-one interview. “I don’t think anybody in the province really wants an election so let’s find a way to work together. My part in that is presenting a throne speech everybody can agree with.”
(Wed, Jun 21: In an exclusive sit-down interview with Global News, Premier Christy Clark talks about Thursday's throne speech and the possibility of a snap election.)

We all know how much can change in a week, especially if one has not principals other than hanging on to power at all costs and by all means. It isn't that we weren't aware of the huge character flaw of Christy's, the only surprise is to what height she takes "Never to be trusted under any circumstances".  She will lie, lie some more and then lie again.

Non-sexual-explicit