We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gay Marriage)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

[EX Q]: Sent1: You did suggest that unmarried heterosexual couples would still be discriminated against, even if we allowed same-sex couples to marry.
 Sent2: Technically though marriage is not discrimination, because gays are still allowed to marry the opposite sex.
[EX A]: Not similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: With gay marriage, the issue is changing marriage to be something it's not, to whatever.
 Sent2: However allowing gay marriage will not automatically allow polygamous marriage...it may lend a little more wieght to it via precedent, but then interracial marriage has done the same for gay marriage even though the actual issues are different.
[EX A]: Not similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: For example, if a state Congress passes a bill that grants additional benefits to marriages and civil unions, a governor could simply line-item veto the benefit to civil unions, which then means that the benefits would apply only to marriage.
 Sent2: Due to the fact that legal marriages between heterosexual couples are granted federal recognition, benefits and interstate transportability which would be denied to Civil Unions if left up to individual states.
[EX A]:
Not similar