Given a document and an entity the task is to select the author's sentiment towards the entity. Sentiments can be Positive, Neutral and Negative. Select Positive if the article expresses a positive view towards the given entity or praises its quality or skills. Select Neutral if the document expresses no clear view towards the entity or has equal amounts of positive and negative statements or expressing some fact/quote by someone else. Select Negative if the article expresses a negative view towards like harsh remarks, criticizing entities action/decision etc. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

Input: Consider Input: What is the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Trump Rachel Maddow ? Close video For all the hype  Nunes memo delivers sad trombone for  Trump  Rachel Maddow points out that despite two weeks of Fox News hype  the Nunes memo is not only underwhelming as a political stunt  it actually undermines the argument it was meant to make for  Donald Trump . share tweet email save Embed
It’s genuinely difficult to find an angle to the House Republicans’ “Nunes memo” that helps its intended beneficiary:  Donald Trump . Every key argument the president and  his  allies hoped to advance has fallen apart   and after weeks of over-the-top hype  Republicans are actually worse off than they were before the previously classified materials were released to the public.
5.  Trump ’s grammar  use of quotation marks  and capitalization of random words is bizarre for an American adult in a position of authority.
In early March   Trump  told the public that  he ’d “just found out” that former President Obama illegally tapped his phones at Trump Tower before the presidential election. “This is Nixon/Watergate ” the Republican said. “Bad (or sick) guy!”
As regular readers may recall  two weeks later  as it became clear that the confused president had relied on a nonsensical report from a right-wing website   Trump  nevertheless told reporters he felt “somewhat” vindicated about his conspiracy theory  thanks to support from House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes (R-Calif.).
 Trump   of course  hadn’t been vindicated. On the contrary  his entire conspiracy theory had been thoroughly discredited  and he accused his predecessor of a felony for no reason. But in the president’s mind  it was clear he’d been right from the start.
And nearly a year later  here we are again  watching  Trump  once again claim vindication  reality be damned.

Output: Positive


Input: Consider Input: What is the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Jackie Robinson ? (CNN) The President has excoriated football players who have joined a protest movement by former 49ers quarterback Colin Kaepernick as unpatriotic. But the President is overlooking history -- which shows athletes now lauded as heroes  like  Jackie Robinson and Muhammad Ali   raising  their  voices (or taking a seat) in protests similar to Kaepernick's.
 Jackie Robinson   rightfully celebrated for showing enormous grace under pressure while breaking baseball's color line  refused to stand for the National Anthem after  his  playing days.
Jackie Robinson as a Brooklyn Dodger.
As  he  described in  his  1972 autobiography   Robinson -- like contemporary NFL players --  was protesting against institutional racism.  He  was expressing  his  feelings of alienation from America's system of racial apartheid.
 Robinson 's pugnacious brand of civil rights activism set the stage for succeeding generations of black athletes. Eleven-time NBA champion Bill Russell emerged as one of the most outspoken civil rights advocates of the 1960s  at a time when the city he played in  Boston  represented one of the most racially segregated cities in the North.
Above all  black American athletes are citizens  fathers  brothers  husbands and sons who have a right and responsibility to continue a long struggle for dignity exemplified by Jackie Robinson  Bill Russell and many others.

Output: Positive


Input: Consider Input: What is the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Steve Bannon ? WASHINGTON (Reuters) - President Donald Trumpâs former strategist Steve Bannon on Sunday  backed away from derogatory comments ascribed to  him  about Trumpâs son in a new book that sparked White House outrage and could threaten Bannonâs influence as a would-be conservative power broker.
 Bannon   ousted from the White House in August  was quoted in âFire and Fury: Inside the Trump White House â by journalist Michael Wolff  as saying a June 2016 meeting with a group of Russians attended by Donald Trump Jr. and his fatherâs top campaign officials was âtreasonousâ and âunpatriotic.â
The president responded by saying  Bannon  had lost his mind  and the White House suggested the hard-right news site Breitbart News part ways with  Bannon  as its executive chairman.
 Bannon  said in a statement released on Sunday that  his  comments were directed at Paul Manafort  Trumpâs former campaign manager  and not aimed at the presidentâs son.
âI regret that my delay in responding to the inaccurate reporting regarding Don Jr. has diverted attention from the presidentâs historical accomplishments in the first year of his presidency â  Bannon  said.
Trump said last week that  Bannon  had nothing to do with  him  or  his  presidency. That scathing response left  Bannon  alienated among the more conservative factions of Trumpâs Republican Party.
 Bannon  said  he  still supported Trump  whose public break with  his  one-time strategist and use of a derisive nickname for  him   âSloppy Steve â reflected the depth of the presidentâs anger.
âMy support is also unwavering for the president and his agenda â  Bannon  said in Sundayâs statement. âI am the only person to date to conduct a global effort to preach the message of Trump and Trumpism  and I remain ready to stand in the breech for this presidentâs efforts to make America great again.â
In the book   Bannon  voiced astonishment over the meeting that Trump Jr.  the presidentâs son-in-law Jared Kushner  and Manafort attended at Trump Tower in New York with a Russian lawyer  who was said to be offering damaging information about former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton  the Democratic presidential candidate.
 Bannon  was quoted as saying  he  was certain Trump Jr. would have taken the Russians who took part in the meeting to meet  his  father.
 Bannon  did not specifically dispute the quotes  but said  his  criticism was meant for Manafort  who is being prosecuted by Special Counsel Robert Mueller as part of a probe into Russian meddling in the 2016 U.S. presidential election.
âMy comments were aimed at Paul Manafort  a seasoned campaign professional with experience and knowledge of how the Russians operate. He should have known they are duplicitous  cunning and not our friends â  Bannon  said.
Miller  a senior policy adviser  said the book was a âgrotesque work of fictionâ and said it was âtragic and unfortunateâ that  Bannon  made the comments in the book that  he  did.


Output: Negative