TASK DEFINITION: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.
PROBLEM: Comment: All of the sarcastic remarks about radical Christian extremism are offered in an attempt to get people to think about the fallacy of attributing all violence by committed by Muslims or people loosely connect with Islam to Islamic terrorism.  Christians are responsible for the holocaust and Christians dropped the atom bomb and Christians have exploited people all over the world  using some the most brutal means to to accomplish their goals that the world has ever seen.  Here in Alaska Christians decimated Native populations thru disease and brutality and raped countless children all the while  forcing the Christian god on them.  Christians bombed the federal building in OK.  I am offering this up because if you want to make a case against Christians there is plenty of fodder.  I happen to believe it is a lot more complex than the things I have outlined above.  But never forget there is a strong case to be made against the white devils.  Think about it.

SOLUTION: Identity-attack

PROBLEM: Comment: Kind of like how people who defend conservative viewpoints and American culture are called "alt right" by CNN? Funny how Nationalism is racist, but nothing to be said about Antifa all over the country SCREAMING "MORE DEAD COPS, MORE WHITE GENOCIDE" or attacking the peaceful marchers on Friday with ACID AND FECES.

SOLUTION: Identity-attack

PROBLEM: Comment: Trump seems like a loose cannon.  Shouldn't he have advisors and the like to caution and restrain him before he goes off saying things that could cause negative repercussions?  Especially some of his sweeping crazy assertions, like the one where he said Ford was planning to shut down in the States and move the jobs to Mexico.  By saying erroneous things, he can hurt Ford shareholders and if wrong and carelessly considered,  even he is subject to lawsuits.  As the prospective president, he carries a burden of due diligence in his pronouncements.

SOLUTION:
Non-identity-attack