In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

[Q]: Comment: As long as Muslims are present,yes you are not safe!!
[A]: Identity-attack


[Q]: Comment: Quote: "Michelle Obama is taking some heat for recent remarks she made on gender, but I'm struggling to muster outrage given the sheer incoherence of what she actually said."

True, I've rarely found what Michelle says coherent, but I suspect that what she's saying is primarily directed at black communities. She could have gone much further and bluntly stated that blacks coddle far too much the criminality and paternal irresponsibility in black males. (I won't call them men.) That's glaringly obvious and different from mostly white schools where ordinary boyishness is attacked as "toxic masculinity."
[A]: Identity-attack


[Q]: Comment: How rich. Install destabilization progressive policies that effect people's lives under a banner of ideology never proven capable of social congruence and then dismantle the fallout using the identity politics of race, gender and class. For good measure, the tactics include dishonest media biasing. Take away our comment sections in many instances, stack the likes, employ non legitimate users, withhold stories and all the while have the gall to demand public finances to stay afloat to defend your version of democracy. Your trickery is disgusting, without credential and this style of propaganda is not rooted in the legitimacy of respected thought. This will not be contained or survived. Whatever rises from your ashes to assist democracy will no doubt be more stabilizing as our strength is our people-to quote something long forgotten.
[A]:
Non-identity-attack