We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

[EX Q]: I think that they would almost have to set basic minimum standards to adhere to, but I agree that the government should not run the classes.
[EX A]: Valid

[EX Q]: Lott's More Guns, Less Crime is the bible of the national movement to persuade state legislatures to pass so-called "concealed carry" laws, which permit citizens to carry concealed firearms.
[EX A]: Valid

[EX Q]: We've also seen the comparison made between a few rouge concealed carry holders and terrorists on airplanes, and the suggestion that the actions of the few should be used to punish the many.
[EX A]:
Valid