In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

Input: Consider Input: Sentence: Bill passed the half-empty plate to John because he was hungry.
 Reason: The 'he' refers to john because Bill wasn't hungry, so he gave the rest to John who was hungry. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

Output: Correct


Input: Consider Input: Sentence: Pete envies Martin although he is very successful.
 Reason: The 'he' refers to pete because Yes, because everything flows according to your destiny. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

Output: Correct


Input: Consider Input: Sentence: The actress used to be named Terpsichore, but she changed it to Tina a  few years ago, because she figured it was easier to pronounce.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to tina because It refers to Tina because that is the shorter name. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 


Output: Correct