Given a document and an entity the task is to select the author's sentiment towards the entity. Sentiments can be Positive, Neutral and Negative. Select Positive if the article expresses a positive view towards the given entity or praises its quality or skills. Select Neutral if the document expresses no clear view towards the entity or has equal amounts of positive and negative statements or expressing some fact/quote by someone else. Select Negative if the article expresses a negative view towards like harsh remarks, criticizing entities action/decision etc. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

Q: What is the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Benjamin Netanyahu ? MUNICH (AP) â The nuclear deal with Iran has emboldened Tehran to become increasingly aggressive in the Middle East   Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu  said Sunday  warning that Iran should "not test Israel's resolve" as  he  showed off what  he  said was part of a downed Iranian drone.
 Netanyahu  said of Iran that if the U.S. decides to scrap the 2015 nuclear deal  which  he  has long opposed  "I think they'll do nothing."
But Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif  appearing two hours later at the same Munich Security Conference  fired back that  Netanyahu 's comment was "delusional thinking."
Kerry dismissed  Netanyahu 's contention that Iran would be on its way to having a nuclear arsenal in 10 years  saying "that's fundamentally not accurate."
Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu  delivers a speech during the International Security Conference in Munich  Germany  Sunday  Feb. 18  2018. (Sven Hoppe/dpa via AP)
 Netanyahu  told world leaders  diplomats and defense officials at the conference that the deal was similar to the infamous 1938 "Munich Agreement" that Western powers signed with Adolf Hitler in an attempt to stave off war in Europe  which became synonymous with appeasement.
"The concessions to Hitler only emboldened the Nazi regime "  he  said. "Rather than choosing a path that might have prevented war... those well-intentioned leaders made a wider war inevitable and far more costly."
Similarly   he  said  the Iranian nuclear agreement has "unleashed a dangerous Iranian tiger in our region and beyond."
Declaring that Iran's "brazenness hit new highs "  he  theatrically held up a fragment of what  he  said was an Iranian drone shot down last week by Israel in Israeli airspace and challenged Zarif.
"Mr. Zarif  do you recognize this? You should  it's yours "  Netanyahu  said. "You can take back with you a message to the tyrants of Tehran â do not test Israel's resolve!"
Tehran has denied that the drone belonged to Iran. Zarif on Sunday dismissed  Netanyahu 's stunt as "a cartoonish circus... which does not even deserve the dignity of a response."
Iranian troops  along with Hezbollah and other Iranian-backed Shiite forces  have aided Syrian President Bashar Assad in his war against rebel groups.  Netanyahu  has repeatedly warned that  he  will not accept a permanent Iranian military presence in postwar Syria  fearing that Iran and its Shiite allies would turn their attention to Israel.
Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu  delivers a speech during the International Security Conference in Munich  Germany  Sunday  Feb. 18  2018. (Sven Hoppe/dpa via AP)
 Netanyahu  has been projecting a business-as-usual approach on  his  visit to Germany amid uproar at home after police on Tuesday said was sufficient evidence to indict  him  for bribery  fraud and breach of trust in two cases.  The Israeli leader  has angrily rejected the accusations and denounced what  he  describes as an overzealous police investigation.  He  has also dismissed the accusations as a witch hunt orchestrated by a hostile media.
Zarif suggested  Netanyahu  might be escalating tensions with Iran simply to distract from  his  domestic problems.
Denouncing what  he  said were Israel's "almost daily illegal incursions into Syrian airspace " Zarif said Israel was trying "to create these cartoonish images to blame others for its own strategic blunders  or maybe to evade the domestic crisis they're facing."

A: Negative
****
Q: What is the sentiment of the following document towards the entity John Loos ? John Loos  who played baseball in high school   recalled Monday how  he  was watching the center fielder move during the Aug. 29 Cubs game against the Pittsburgh Pirates at Wrigley Field when  he  was hit.  He  was not on  his  cellphone   he  said.
âI like the science of baseball  so I tend to watch the center fielder move as a pitch is made to see how they are trying to get a jump on the ball â  John Loos  said. âI like watching the pitch speeds  things like that.â
Wearing a patch over  his  left eye and glasses   Loos  said  he  didnât see the foul ball coming at  him . Through  his  lawsuit   he  wants the Cubs to expand their netting to prevent other fans from getting hit with flying balls or bats.
 Loos  was sitting in Section 135 â overlooking a stretch of the the first base line that extends to the outfield â during the game in which  he  was injured. An adult friend of  his  daughter has ties to the Cubs  which allowed them to get into the game without a ticket.
 Loos  was taken by ambulance from Wrigley to Advocate Illinois Masonic Medical Center.  He  has undergone three surgeries since then and is expected to have at least two more.
 Loos  said  he  may have to replace  his  left eye with a prosthesis.  He  said  he  can still see out of  his  right eye but has had problems adjusting to light and shadows.
 Loos â attorney  Colin Dunn  said they have not determined how fast the ball was going when it hit  Loos   though he has seen video of the incident on social media.
 John Loos  remains a Cubs fan  but  he  has no plans to watch any future games from where  he  was hit with the foul ball.
âHonestly  I would probably be at home or at a bar across the street â  he  said.

A: Neutral
****
Q: What is the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Donald Trump Jacobus ? An appeals court upheld a decision Tuesday tossing a Republican commentator's $4 million defamation suit against  President Trump   ruling  his  tweeted insults "were opinion and not fact."
A lower court dismissed Cheryl Jacobus's suit in January  ruling she was engaged in a "petty quarrel" with  Trump  that did not rise to the level of defamation.  Trump  called  her  "a real dummy " among other jabs.
Jacobus  a GOP consultant and TV commentator  sued  Trump  and his former campaign manager  Corey Lewandowski  in April 2016  contending that they raised questions about her professional ethics by suggesting that she only criticized  Trump  on TV after his campaign turned her down for a job early in 2015.
 Trump 's attorney  Larry Rosen  said the President was entitled to his opinion just like anyone else. (Jonathan Bachman/AP)
Cheryl Jacobus says  Trump  'destroyed' her career in $4M suit

A:
Neutral
****