We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

[EX Q]: The fact that you like cars is why you will tolerate the fact that more kids are killed by cars then guns.
[EX A]: Valid

[EX Q]: The 2nd Amendment doesn't say you have to be in a militia or participate one, it just aknowledges your right to own firearms for the purpose of forming one; i.e. no membership is implied or required to exercise it.
[EX A]: Valid

[EX Q]: It is true that guns are responsible for the majority of murders but knives are number two and cars are considered weapons by the police.
[EX A]:
Valid