In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: toxic and non-toxic. Toxicity is defiend as anything that is rude, disrespectful, or unreasonable that would make someone want to leave a converation.

Example Input: Comment: CommonWetDreams.org is a completely lame citation.

Try some hard facts instead, It was desperate and huge turnout by white evangelicals in the "firewall" states that put Trump over. 

These fanatics were hardly going to vote for Sanders, who was even more aligned with the "Black Devil" in the White House.

Clinton won the vote of the lower income segment and all race/cultural minorities. Sanders wouldn't have done better.

-- Paul
Example Output: Non-toxic

Example Input: Comment: The cost of flying somewhere you have to go to work or live is too high to leave any money for tips. What an idiot.
Example Output: Toxic

Example Input: Comment: Sean Maney,
There is a real "hole" in the system that does back ground checks for OCS and other agencies (private) that rely on it.
If a person has lost their "professional" license to be a mental health social worker or counselor because they had a sexual relationship with one of their juvenile clients in another state (Washington for example) but for some reason was never criminally charged, that person can move to Alaska and go to work at a agency that requires background checks and that person will pass. Or, if you are an attorney who has sexually inappropriate actions with a client they were appointed to represent and they are either disbarred or surrender their license in Alaska, they can move to Nome or Bethel and volunteer to coach a youth soccer team. That will not show up on the OCS background check because there were no criminal charges. 
I have pointed this out to OCS and other agencies but nothing was done. Our state representative was also contacted, nothing happened.
Example Output:
Non-toxic