In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine the neutral choice based on your inference from the statement and your commonsense knowledge. The neutral choice is a sentence that neither agrees nor disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3', corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence. If sentence X agrees with sentence Y, one's correctness follows from the other one. If sentence X disagrees with sentence Y, they can not be correct at the same time.

[Q]: Statement: well that's great how about your Choices: 1. It is really good. 2. That's nice to hear about. 3. That's terrible.
[A]: 2


[Q]: Statement: He saw the shine of steel in their hands. Choices: 1. He noticed the gleam of steel in their hands. 2. He noticed the gleam of steel in the warrior's hand. 3. He wasn't able to make out their hands.
[A]: 2


[Q]: Statement: Other members included Supreme Court Chief Justice Daniel Wathen, Supreme Court Justice (and former LSC Board Member) Howard Dana, the Presidents of the State Bar Association and the State Bar Foundation, a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, and a representative each from the University of Maine School of Law and the Boards of Pine Tree Legal Assistance and Legal Services for the Elderly. Choices: 1. Supreme Court Justice Howard Dana was one of the members listed. 2. The President of the State Bar Association wasn't one of the members. 3. The President of the State Bar Foundation thought that the University of Maine School of Law representatives shouldn't have been members.
[A]:
3