In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence can be inferred from the statement. Incorrect choices change the meaning in important ways or have details that are not mentioned in the statement. Indicate your answer as 1,2, or 3 corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.

Q: Statement: Such information could be the size of the program or activity you are reviewing, for example. Choices:  1. Participant statistics can also be used as relevant information.  2. Activities not being reviewed are valid to include.  3. The size of the program is relevant information that may be used. 

A: 3
****
Q: Statement: Impeachment, once taboo, now seems like a legitimate weapon, a way to settle the score. Choices:  1. Impeachment seems like a good way to get back at them. 2. Impeachment is never a good idea. 3. Impeachment can be a good way to make things even, depending when it's done.

A: 1
****
Q: Statement: At La Samaritaine opposite Pont-Neuf (at 75 rue de Rivoli), you'll find everything from home furnishings to pets, and a splendid view of the city from its 10th-floor terrace. Choices:  1. The A La Samaritaine specifically has fourteen floors to it. 2. Pet's are generally a work of fiction, as no animals have successfully been domesticated. 3. The A La Samaritaine has at least 10 floors, with a terrace on the 10th floor.

A:
3
****