We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Ex Input:
Sent1: I think it is interesting that gun nuts always claim that when guns are banned people will just use knives instead, yet we find that with guns prohibited there are still only 200 deaths a year from knife like weapons.
 Sent2: If we're going to ban guns,we might as well bans knives,fireworks,and even computers.

Ex Output:
Similar


Ex Input:
Sent1: Less gun control probably means more criminals will have guns, however it also means more civilian lives will be saved.
 Sent2: If that means gun control then so be it, but it does not.

Ex Output:
Not similar


Ex Input:
Sent1: Or, to put it another way, more guns = more crime, and if we could stop the illegal gun running then we would have less guns = less crime.
 Sent2: When we factor in the usefulness of guns for self-defense against violent criminals, it's clear that normal gun owners are at less risk of criminal victimization.

Ex Output:

Not similar