In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

Example Input: Sentence: We went to the lake, because a shark had been seen at the ocean beach, so it was a safer place to swim.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the lake because of its proximity to the ocean and its location close to the northern coast. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Example Output: Wrong

Example Input: Sentence: The older students were bullying the younger ones, so we punished them .
 Reason: The 'them' refers to the older students because the older students were punished because of bullying younger ones. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Example Output: Correct

Example Input: Sentence: The cat was lying by the mouse hole waiting for the mouse, but it was too impatient.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the cat because The mouse would be the one in need of being cautious in this situation. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Example Output:
Wrong