In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.

[Q]: Comment: Great article.  "A free society should honour the life, choices, and dignity of all of its members. A bill that could lead to the denial of government services on the basis of religion does not conform to this ideal."  I absolutely agree. Once we allow the state to meddle in the life choices of a few minority members, we open ourselves and other groups to be the next target.
[A]: Disagree


[Q]: Comment: No one is asking that Cornwallis be erased from any book.  It would be great if the scope of Cornwallis' crimes were studied and published in detail.  Public monuments like statutes are generally intended to honour individuals.  We shouldn't be honouring Cornwallis.
[A]: Disagree


[Q]: Comment: Are you kidding me ?  That's wishful thinking run amok .  Who told you that ? FNN , The Washington Post or New York Times ?   Murkowski is stabbing her fellow republican's in the back.  You think they are going to tolerate that ?  Look what happens in the Alaska legislature when people aren't loyal . And that's child play compared to the U.S. Senate .  She is clearly digging her and Alaska's grave by her disloyalty . Only Dan Sullivan can save us from being punished because of her.
[A]:
Disagree