We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Example Input: To me, the system's job is one thing: To prevent a similar crime from happening again, not to fulfill a concept that we have invented.
Example Output: Valid

Example Input: You are concentrating on the negative impact caused by punishing accused but emotions are not worth the amount of innocent lives that will be taken by the actions of these very criminals?
Example Output: Valid

Example Input: Why not just work to reform the justice system, instead of working to stop the death penalty, then working to reform the justice system, and THEN working to reinstitute the death penalty.
Example Output:
Valid