We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

[Q]: Sent1: There has been so much cases of people who have been executed, only to be found innocent after their death.
 Sent2: "We know for a FACT that innocent people have been put to death already"- then give me their names.
[A]: Similar


[Q]: Sent1: Life incarceration will never let him kill again, and its cheaper.
 Sent2: Life imprisonment without parole is more effective than execution, and it is cheaper.
[A]: Similar


[Q]: Sent1: If I could be satisfactorily convinced that a murderer had ZERO chance of committing another crime, I might be convinced to do away with the death penalty.
 Sent2: Some crimes are so heinous that the person who committed the crime deserves to die: I would only agree to this if the execution erased the crime that was committed in the first place.
[A]:
Not similar