In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine the neutral choice based on your inference from the statement and your commonsense knowledge. The neutral choice is a sentence that neither agrees nor disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3', corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence. If sentence X agrees with sentence Y, one's correctness follows from the other one. If sentence X disagrees with sentence Y, they can not be correct at the same time.

Ex Input:
Statement: you know i think a lot of people like i said are more concerned with you know right now you know the aspects of saving the earth um Choices: 1. i think many people are becoming more environmentally conscious 2. i think a lot of people are realizing for the first time how important recycling is 3. i think fewer people than ever care about the earth

Ex Output:
2


Ex Input:
Statement: This holding not only has no foundation in our jurisprudence Choices: 1. Our jurisprudence is clearly the foundation for this holding. 2. Holdings can have foundations in our jurisprudence. 3. This holding is that all people are entitled to keep and raise chickens in their houses.

Ex Output:
3


Ex Input:
Statement: The objective is to keep the won from falling much more than is necessary for the long-run adjustment of the Korean economy, and thereby to prevent unnecessary bankruptcies and unnecessary depression of Korean income and employment. Choices: 1. Preventing bankruptcies and depression in the Korean economy is the goal of keeping the won from falling.  2. Dropping the won as low as possible in value is the goal.  3. Keeping the won from falling involves influencing banks and financiers through government agencies. 

Ex Output:

3