In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

Example Input: Comment: Right. A Church that says "women are inferior to men" is something for women to hold on to.
Example Output: Identity-attack

Example Input: Comment: Trump's approach on DACA is unconscionable because he is so concerned to preserve some face that he’s willing to leave all the Dreamers hanging in a suspended state, with all the fear and anxiety that creates for them and their friends and loved ones. 











Even if he’s committed to doing the right thing in the end, he’s going about it in such an awful and immoral way that he can’t be given much credit for it.
Example Output: Non-identity-attack

Example Input: Comment: I'll just say it one more time, most other immigrants come legally, on a jet, with credentials.  If they overstay, thats wrong.  But most Mexicans come in ILLEGALLY with criminal intent to stay based on that criteria.  Frankly, I prefer Mexicans to Muslims (from the seven countries Obama labeled) The Hispanics aren't Islamic, which is a hateful dogma, or have a death wish comparable to the suicide bombers, drawn from their faith.  You'll have to go back a few posts to find me maligning your name, but its all good. You've dutifully anointed me as your good Lord Twyford, and I am forever humbled. Talley ho old chap!
Example Output:
Identity-attack