In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Example Input: Comment: Totally agree that the gov't is asleep at the wheel in this regard and it is now time to block foreign ownership altogether.
Example Output: Non-obscene

Example Input: Comment: Totally agree. Cargo was a true 5 tool guy, and one of the best all round players in MLB for a few years. But even when he's NOT in the middle of a horrific slump, virtually the only time he seems to do damage, is when it's early, or we're way up or way down. He's completely regressed as he's aged, completely opposite of what's expected of a veteran. And I've said for a WHILE that he's literally THE LAST position player I want coming to the plate w/the game on the line. 
CLEARLY, Story took offense at my comment, and is trying to wrest that title from him. 
I wish there was a stat for the distance between the bat and the ball during clutch situation whiffs. I'm joking... kinda. But if they actually HAD such a stat, Cargo'd be among the league leaders. Be it sliders or curves off of the plate, or fastballs up around his shoulders, he misses by a LOT.
He's a great guy, he's awesome in the locker room/dugout, and having a bilingual veteran leader in today's MLB sure can't hurt. But DAMN.
Example Output: Obscene

Example Input: Comment: Well of course, it is now perfectly clear, canoeing is a massively insulting example of cultural appropriation.   You have to wonder what some of these folks think they are going to accomplish with these ludicrous crusades.
Example Output:
Non-obscene