In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Q: Comment: Dick the butcher had it right: "The first thing we'll do, let's kill all the lawyers." How I wish. JZ wouldn't know a 'mala fide' action if it jumped up and bit him on the bum. These so called legal advisers are nothing more than merdivorous bottom feeders. Come the glorious day, let's have these traitors up against the wall!

A: Sexual-explicit
****
Q: Comment: Everyone should have to learn their RRRs in school: Republicans are Ridiculous.

A: Non-sexual-explicit
****
Q: Comment: "Any lawyer worth his fee would tell Trump ..." (COMPLETE THE SENTENCE)

Who says worthy lawyers haven't tried?  Some worthy lawyers (like the first four Trump tried to hire that turned him down--CBC news) won't touch him. Trump's 5th choice, -Marc Kasowitz, a corporate, not criminal, lawyer--agreed to represent him.  I suspect Mr. Kasowitz is discovering what the others feared would happen if they shook hands with him: Trump won't listen to advice, or, if he does, "forgets" to follow the advice. Or forgets he was offered the advice.  Or forgets... aw, never mind.

In other words, the legal community has probably categorized the Pres. as the Client from Hell.  Just like those poor schmucks on "Apprentice" who realized, much too late, that he was the Boss from Hell.

A:
Non-sexual-explicit
****