In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

[EX Q]: Comment: Douglas Saunders is right about one thing.  Blacks are better off under Obama. Where else in the world can a single Black woman have six children from six different "Baby Daddies" and collect $60,000 in cash cards and housing benefits annually, free medical care for her family, pay no taxes, doesn't even have to look for work let alone work, and when her children are in school they get two or three free meals a day, and free meals even in some states during summer vacation. And the "Baby Daddies" don't have to pay child support. Life is good in the hood.
[EX A]: Non-sexual-explicit

[EX Q]: Comment: Just think how things would be if we had the former pres, you know...the one who did MORE than grab genitals....the rapist-sexual predator back in the WH.  What would we call him?  The 1st Abuser? Predator? Rapist? Any thoughts?  LOL...
[EX A]: Sexual-explicit

[EX Q]: Comment: Funny. So born and bred German boyos don't do any rapin'? Just like in Canada, it's the minorities like Bernardo, Williams, and Pickton raping Canadian women. You don't seem to car about that though. Why? Why are you not affronted by white men rapin' yer wimminfolk?


lolz
[EX A]:
Sexual-explicit