instruction:
The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the self-need strategy, otherwise output No. self-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to create a personal need for an item in the negotiation, such as by pointing out that the participant sweats a lot to show preference towards water packages.
question:
Context: 'Great, we can split the food, how are you on water?' 'That would be great. I need to have frequent small meals throughout the day so the extra food would help. I have plenty of water. ' 'alright, so I'll keep the water, and firewood, and give you 2 extra food.  Does that sound like a good deal?'
Utterance: 'I actually need one firewood and one food package. I can give you one water. '
answer:
Yes


question:
Context: 'me too. I don't care about water since we are camping near a river.' 'I would consider giving you all food and water if I could get all of the wood.' 'Oh really? I think I am able to do it without firewood then. The kids will be full and probably won't ask for smores'
Utterance: 'Or 1 wood for you and 2 of food and water?'
answer:
No


question:
Context: 'so If I understand correctly, the Deal is I get 3 Food and 2 Water: While you get 3 Firewood and 1 Water?' 'I was just negotiating the water for now.  I was trying to do one at a time.' 'ah, I'm definitely ok with doing one at a time: A 2:1 split is definitely OK with me: The issue is, if we consider each individually, it might be harder to come to a deal, but I'm happy to do it your way.'
Utterance: 'How about you take 1 firewood, I''l take 2 and with food, you can have 2 and I'll take one package.  I have two very hungry boys!'
answer:

No