Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.

[Q]: The Pope should concern himself with issues surrounding his faith, and keep his nose out of OUR problem of illegal immigration.
[A]: Yes


[Q]: "City attorney Bill Falsey said Tuesday that Anchorage police are unable to provide services past McHugh Creek".  My understanding is that DPS decided decades ago that all law enforcement officers are certified by the state, so therefore jurisdictions are irrelevant.  Remember the (TS)AIA cop who chased the kid all the way from the airport to Indian and killed him?  I'm sure that line at McHugh Creek really won't matter to APD if push comes to shove.
[A]: No


[Q]: We could charge all owners and caregivers of dogs that inflict severe or fatal injuries to other dogs or humans with animal neglect. They neglected to keep their dog safe, so the dog and others suffered. 

This breed neutral law would ban the owners/handlers from owning or handling dogs.  No responsible dog owner would be punished. This proposed law would punish the guilty party, the negligent dog owner.
[A]:
Yes