We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.
--------
Question: NY responds by arguing that their gun restriction scheme cannot get a fair test to prove its worth because gun runners evade the restrictions by going to other states with less restrictive laws to import the guns illegally.

Answer: Valid


Question: Given the dissenting opinions, in the future they can not reasonably argue (because their active-duty-militia-status argument failed so miserably) that there is no individual right to keep and bear arms suitable for collective defense.

Answer: Valid


Question: You're so quick at finding the exceptions in California's mandatory storage law, you should have no problem understanding the language of the basic Castle Doctrine laws.

Answer:
Valid