Given a passage, construct a question on the basis of the information present in the passage. Construct the question in such a way that (i) it is unambiguous, (ii) it is answerable from the passage, (iii) its answer is unique (iv) it answer uses text phrases from the passage. Avoid creating questions that (i) can't be answered correctly without actually understanding the passage and (ii) uses the same words or phrases given in the passage.

Example Input: Although evidence suggests that antiretroviral (ARV) regimens containing nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) are superior to single-protease inhibitor (PI)-based regimens at suppressing viral load, it is unclear how much of the improved viral suppression is due to intrinsic drug potency versus higher levels of adherence to simpler regimens. We therefore examined adherence and viral suppression in NNRTI and single-PI regimens in a cohort of largely ARV-experienced participants by using objective measures of adherence.', "Participants were recruited from the Research on Access to Care in the Homeless (REACH) Cohort and were included in the study if they were on single-PI-based or NNRTI-based highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) regimens for at least 3 months prior to study entry. Adherence was measured by unannounced pill counts at the participant's usual place of residence. The primary outcome was suppression of HIV viral RNA to <50 copies/mL.", 'Among 109 individuals who were followed for a median of 8.7 months, the odds of virologic suppression were approximately 8 times higher (p < .01) for participants on NNRTI-based regimens (n = 53) compared with those using single-PI-based regimens (n = 56) when controlling for adherence, as well as other potential confounders in a multivariable analysis. The only other independent predictors of viral suppression in multivariable modeling were ARV adherence (p < .01), CD4 nadir (p = .02), and continuous months on current regimen prior to the start of adherence monitoring (p < .01). There was no significant difference in adherence by unannounced pill counts in participants receiving NNRTI- versus single-PI-containing regimens.
Example Output: Are higher rates of viral suppression with nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors compared to single protease inhibitors explained by better adherence?

Example Input: The aim of this meta-analysis was to study the relation between access site and bivalirudin use on outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS).', 'Bivalirudin and radial access use are 2 strategies that are increasingly used to lower major bleeding in patients with ACS undergoing invasive approaches. The interaction between these 2 strategies and the benefit of using them in combination are unclear.', 'This analysis included randomized controlled trials that compared bivalirudin to heparin with or without glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors in patients with ACS and reported outcomes stratified by arterial access site. Meta-analyses of outcome data were performed on the basis of access site and anticoagulation regimen. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated from event rates using random-effects models.', 'Eight trials with a total of 27,491 patients were included. Bivalirudin reduced major bleeding risk in patients with femoral access (OR: 0.51; 95% CI: 0.46 to 0.6; p\xa0< 0.001) but not in patients with radial access (OR: 0.75; 95% CI: 0.45 to 1.26; p\xa0= 0.28). Moreover, radial access reduced major bleeding risk in patients treated with heparin (OR: 0.57; 95% CI: 0.43 to 0.77; p\xa0< 0.001) but not in patients treated with bivalirudin (OR: 0.96; 95% CI: 0.65 to 1.41; p\xa0= 0.83). There were no differences in major adverse cardiovascular events or all-cause mortality between bivalirudin and heparin, regardless of access site.
Example Output: Is combined Use of Bivalirudin and Radial Access in Acute Coronary Syndromes Superior to the Use of Either One Separately : Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials?

Example Input: A reduced capacity of antigen presenting cells (APC) to provide pro-T helper 1 (Th1) signals, such as IL-12, to T cells during early life may be implicated in the development of T helper 2 (Th2)-mediated allergic disease. In this study we examined the relationships between the capacity for IL-12 responses in the neonatal period and atopic risk (family allergy), in vitro T cell responses to allergens, and the subsequent development of allergic disease at 6 years.', 'The capacity of circulating neonatal (and maternal) APC to produce IL-12 p70 in response to LPS (and IFN-gamma) stimulation was assessed in a group of 60 children with previously well-characterized immune responses to allergens and atopic outcomes. The IL-12 responses were compared with allergen-induced lymphoproliferation (to house dust mite (HDM) ovalbumin (OVA), cat and beta-lactoglobulin (BLG)) and IL-13 and IFN-gamma cytokine responses (to OVA, HDM and phytohaemaglutinin (PHA)) in the neonatal and postnatal periods. IL-12 responses were also compared according to atopic risk and atopic outcomes (doctor-diagnosed asthma, eczema, food allergies and sensitization as evidenced by skin prick testing) at 6 years clinical follow-up.', 'Maternal peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) synthesized significantly greater amounts of IL-12 than neonatal PBMC, though within maternal-infant pairs IL-12 responses were significantly correlated (r = 0.4, P = 0.019). Moreover, neonatal IL-12 responses were positively correlated with neonatal allergen proliferation for HDM (r = 0.6, P < 0.0001), OVA (r = 0.55, P < 0.0001), cat (r = 0.5, P = 0.003) and BLG (r = 0.55, P = 0.001), but negatively correlated with neonatal IL-13 responses to both allergens tested (HDM: r = - 0.4, P = 0.03 and OVA: r = - 0.5, P = 0.001). Both neonatal and maternal IL-12 responses were positively correlated with postnatal IFN-gamma responses to HDM at 12, 18 and 24 months of age (responses after age of 2 years were not assessed). There was no relationship between atopic risk and IL-12 capacity in the neonatal period, but there was a (non-significant) trend for neonatal IL-12 responses to be lower in the high-risk children who developed clinical allergy at 6 years (compared with the low risk group) although the number in this analysis was small.
Example Output:
Is neonatal interleukin-12 capacity associated with variations in allergen-specific immune responses in the neonatal and postnatal periods?