The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the no-need strategy, otherwise output No. no-need is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used when a participant points out that they do not need an item based on personal context such as suggesting that they have ample water to spare. no-need can directly benefit the opponent since it implies that the item is up for grabs.

[Q]: Context: 'Hey, I was thinking that I could take all of the food items, and 2 of the firewood items. My friend has low blood sugar and they need the food in case they crash, and the warmth of the fire to maintain at evening.' 'Water is my highest priority, what is yours? Is it food?'
Utterance: 'Yes, food is my highest. It's necessary for my friend to keep extra around just in case he crashes. Why is water your highest priority?'
[A]: No


[Q]: Context: 'I'm doing pretty good. I plan on camping with the family this weekend, how about you?' 'Nice. Same, it's over 100 degrees where I live. 🙂' 'Yikes! It's a bit colder up here, that's why I would like to bring some extra firewood to stay warm at night.'
Utterance: 'Oh, I see what you did there. No problem I have plenty of firewood for you buddy. 🙂'
[A]: Yes


[Q]: Context: 'Same. Plus I am planning on keeping a fire long into the night. Eating alot of food also helps keep you warm while sleeping. Perhaps I could offer you some extra food in return for some extra firewood?' 'Hmm I will have to think about this offer. How do you feel about the water packages?' 'I am a water junkie day to day but the place I am camping as a stream and I'm taking my water filter system, so I could offer you extra water in this case.'
Utterance: 'That is very considerate of you. 🙂'
[A]:
No