We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.
--------
Question: Sent1: Almost every study I've seen on the deterrent effect of the death penalty has suggested that it's no more effective than life imprisonment.
 Sent2: I feel as though you're implying that the death penalty is an effective crime deterrent.

Answer: Similar


Question: Sent1: The crimes meriting the death penalty are by-and-large not commited by those considering the consequences, no matter what those consequences may be.
 Sent2: That should be a crime which should result in the death penalty.

Answer: Not similar


Question: Sent1: The first reason of abolishing the death penalty is human rights perspectives and the danger of executing innocent people .
 Sent2: There are many reasons the death penalty should be abolished.

Answer:
Similar