In this task, you are given a part of an article. Your task is to generate headline (title) for this text. Preferred headlines are under fifteen words.

Q: The basic features of some of the most versatile and popular open source frameworks for machine learning (TensorFlow, Deep Learning4j, and H2O) are considered and compared. Their comparative analysis was performed and conclusions were made as to the advantages and disadvantages of these platforms. The performance tests for the de facto standard MNIST data set were carried out on H2O framework for deep learning algorithms designed for CPU and GPU platforms for single-threaded and multithreaded modes of operation. Keywords—machine learning; deep learning; TensorFlow; Deep Learning4j; H2O; MNIST; multicore CPU; GPU.

A: Comparative Analysis of Open Source Frameworks for Machine Learning with Use Case in Single- Threaded and Multi-Threaded Modes
****
Q: We propose a framework grounded in Logic Programming for representing and reasoning about business processes from both the procedural and ontological point of views. In particular, our goal is threefold: (1) define a logical language and a formal semantics for process models enriched with ontology-based annotations; (2) provide an effective inference mechanism that supports the combination of reasoning services dealing with the structural definition of a process model, its behavior, and the domain knowledge related to the participating business entities; (3) implement such a theoretical framework into a process modeling and reasoning platform. To this end we define a process ontology coping with a relevant fragment of the popular BPMN modeling notation. The behavioral semantics of a process is defined as a state transition system by following an approach similar to the Fluent Calculus, and allows us to specify state change in terms of preconditions and effects of the enactment of activities. Then we show how the procedural process knowledge can be seamlessly integrated with the domain knowledge specified by using the OWL 2 RL rule-based ontology language. Our framework provides a wide range of reasoning services, including CTL model checking, which can be performed by using standard Logic Programming inference engines through a goal-oriented, efficient, sound and complete evaluation procedure. We also present a software environment implementing the proposed framework, and we report on an experimental evaluation of the system, whose results are encouraging and show the viability of the approach.

A: Ontology-based Representation and Reasoning on Process Models: A Logic Programming Approach
****
Q: There are already quite a few tools for solving the Satisfiability Modulo Theories (SMT) problems. In this paper, we present VolCE, a tool for counting the solutions of SMT constraints, or in other words, for computing the volume of the solution space. Its input is essentially a set of Boolean combinations of linear constraints, where the numeric variables are either all integers or all reals, and each variable is bounded. The tool extends SMT solving with integer solution counting and volume computation/estimation for convex polytopes. Effective heuristics are adopted, which enable the tool to deal with high-dimensional problem instances efficiently and accurately.

A:
A Tool for Computing and Estimating the Volume of the Solution Space of SMT(LA) Constraints
****