In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.
--------
Question: Comment: The question I have for BLM is: why aren't you hijacking and staging a sit-in at Toronto's Caribbean Festival Parade in August to highlight your message and agenda? It would seem like you would have a far more receptive and understanding audience there.
But no. BLM is blatantly using Pride because it is a bigger, broader, more popular and better-attended event. BLM absolutely does not care at all about the gay community; if so, they would be highlighting the homophobia and anti-gay violence in Caribbean and African counties, where gays have absolutely no rights at all.
The police absolutely must be allowed to march in next year's Pride parade. And BLM, by having violated the rules on parade participation on Sunday, must be banned.

Answer: Non-obscene


Question: Comment: Once again Rhyner, you manage to typify the average Trump fan: undereducated older white male. If you knew anything about the history of prohibition you'd know it was a miserable failure in so many ways. Pick up a history book sometime, and read the damn thing.

Answer: Obscene


Question: Comment: I take issue with "the god of the Jewish Bible is a cruel, vindictive, angry assassin".

In addition it appears to be unrelated to the article.

Answer:
Non-obscene