In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

[EX Q]: Comment: But Brexit, Trump, etc. have shown people can be di*cks! Many of them don't even know what they are voting for.
[EX A]: Sexual-explicit

[EX Q]: Comment: City government is guilty of making housing and living here more expensive - not less. Incompetent and corrupt.
[EX A]: Non-sexual-explicit

[EX Q]: Comment: Tri...Let's stipulate that disagreements over Chaput vs Cupich or One Tobin vs The Other Tobin or Trump vs Clinton or Affordable Care Act vs An alterntative or Contraception vs. NFP or Maureen Fiedler vs Raymond Burke or the Reporter vs the Register do NOT constitute "SCHISMS"------any more than Winter vs Summer or JP II vs Charles Curran constituted schisms. 

It's about time we Catholics, on the Right and on the Left, trust each other to discern, to rigorously inform our consciences, and to love our Church family. Enough with the Litmus Tests for determining "authentic" Catholics. Imagine how silly--VERY silly--it sounds: "You're more/less a good Catholic because of whom you vote for or how you plan your family or how you are intimate."    

Why at Mass yesterday did I see in the parking lot cars with Hillary stickers and cars with Trump stickers, with the drivers ALL going to Mass and Communion? Celebrate it; don't lament it. Nobody was in schism, I assure you.
[EX A]:
Non-sexual-explicit