We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

Input: Consider Input: Is it the lasting bloodline of a nation of frontiersmen, born from armed struggle against an empire?

Output: Valid


Input: Consider Input: The first part indicates the importance of the militia, the second part illustrates that the people may be part of that well regulated body or not without infringement of their right to keep and bear arms.

Output: Valid


Input: Consider Input: That most people can't be trusted, so we should have more laws against guns, which most people will abide by because they can be trusted.


Output: Valid