We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

Example Input: For instance, if something was written that says Gun owners should be skilled with their own firearms, but someone leaves off the s.
Example Output: Valid

Example Input: So now you're saying that just because somebody owns a gun, they're somehow more likely to start killing people than somebody who doesn't own a gun?
Example Output: Valid

Example Input: You would rather be confronted by a guy with a baseball bat because you are FAR more likely to get killed by the guy with the gun.
Example Output:
Valid