Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.

Input: Consider Input: It is a pretty flat pay scale for the nano guy. As a long-time full professor in engineering/computer science in San Diego he was probably making $175,000 a year or more. So he doubles his pay to become chief of a huge research center, and makes ~10X more than the lowest-paid employee. He probably makes less than some of the doctors in the institute.

Output: No


Input: Consider Input: We are in agreement. But what does it matter if one is dealt with before the other, particularly since the campus policy effects thousands every day, staff, students, and visitors, while the capitol might see a few hundreds a year? The perfect is the enemy of the good, it is perfectly valid to remove restrictions one step at a time.

That is, after all, how we went from no legal carry in '93 to permitless in '04. One improvement at a time.

Output: No


Input: Consider Input: Why, is the police's part. The neighborhood seems odd for home invasion at middle of afternoon. Unless we have a new group targeting upper middle class on hillside. How did they know he was home? He said he had package, wasn't afraid to use force. Then left. But..to shoot the dog is scabby. Dog was probably doing what all dogs do. Warning strangers away!


Output: Yes