In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Ex Input:
Comment: Wow! If you think this article represents "common sense truth seeking" you really need to go back to the drawing board. This woman is a dishonest extremist who trades in propagandist lies.

Ex Output:
Non-sexual-explicit


Ex Input:
Comment: "Arson in the second degree 
164.315 
 A person commits the crime of arson in the second degree if:

By knowingly engaging in the manufacture of methamphetamine, the person causes fire or causes an explosion that damages ...Any property of another and the damages to the property exceed $750"

I think we need to add 'hash oil manufacturing' to this Oregon statute.   Too many stoned idiots are out there playing  chemist.

Ex Output:
Non-sexual-explicit


Ex Input:
Comment: It doesn't meant I have to die soon to.

Ex Output:

Non-sexual-explicit