In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

[Q]: Comment: A witch hunt, nothing more nothing less. Did she give any thought to the 3,000 who died in New York and what success has the ICC had to date with the untold $millions which have been spent by this elitist "old boys' club". Pray tell why the Sudanese President is still at large and Mugabe travels freely throughout the world? Ermine robed, latte sipping parasites - that is the ICC.
[A]: Non-identity-attack


[Q]: Comment: Is there any specific reason you have to be so condescending? You seem to have a serious judgement problem to make a statement like I haven't read the article. If I didn't I wouldn't have known of your biased almost racist rant.  And you stated you "have seen people who have written.."  Really you saw them actually writing the comments?  Amazing or untrue.  You read what they wrote, you didn't see them writing. You seem confused.  Bad journalism.  As far a Sessions comment, you had your own explanation and I disagreed with you.  I guess no one can disagree with you because you are a journalist.  You write articles  and responses however you please, but if someone disagrees with your elitist condescending posts you get them ruled uncivil.  You have to hide behind CB I guess because of your feelings of inadequacy.  In your mind the posts are all wrong and you are right.  Most seem to agree with me.  Ever ask yourself why you feel you have to vehemently defend yourself all the time?
[A]: Non-identity-attack


[Q]: Comment: Two points.

Satire doesn't really work in today's World.

The US also just elected a twitter troll as its President.
[A]:
Non-identity-attack