Given a document, an entity and its sentiment towards the entity, verify if it is the correct sentiment towards the entity. Answer should be yes or no. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

Ex Input:
Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Christopher Wray is Neutral . Follow a critique of the FBI by President Trump on Monday   Christopher Wray   the director of the FBI  sent out an internal letter to employees on Monday  a government source confirmed to Fox News.
In it   Wray  wrote that  he  was "inspired by example after example of professionalism and dedication to justice demonstrated around the Bureau. It is truly an honor to represent you."
"We are entrusted with protecting the American people and upholding the Constitution and laws of the United States "  Wray  also wrote. "Because of the importance of our mission  we are also entrusted with great power  and we should expect – and welcome – people asking tough questions about how we use that power. That goes with this job and always has."
 Wray  emerged from a list of former prosecutors  politicians and law enforcement officials interviewed by Trump to become director of the bureau.
When was  Wray  installed as FBI Director?
 Wray  was formally installed as the new director of the FBI on Sep. 28  after  he  was confirmed by the Senate on a 92-5 vote in August. All five nay votes came from Democrats.
 He  was unanimously approved by the Senate Judiciary Committee in July  after  he  appeared before the committee. President Trump called Wray "an impeccably qualified individual" in a June statement.
What did  Wray  do before  he  was confirmed by the Senate?
 Wray  worked at the King & Spalding law firm  where  he 'd been a partner since August 2005   his  Senate Judiciary Committee questionnaire said.
 Wray  also represented New Jersey governor Chris Christie during the investigation into the George Washington Bridge lane-closing case  nicknamed "Bridgegate." Two former Christie aides were convicted of plotting to close bridge lanes to punish a Democratic mayor who wouldn't endorse the Republican governor.
What about  Wray 's time at the Department of Justice (DOJ)?
 Wray  worked as an associate deputy attorney general in 2001  before  he  was principal associate deputy attorney general from 2001 - 2003   his  Senate Judiciary Committee questionnaire says. From 2003 to 2005   Wray  worked as assistant attorney general for the criminal division under President George W. Bush.
What do we know about  Wray 's career before working for the DOJ?
 Wray  graduated from Yale University in 1989 before graduating from  its  law school three years later  the DOJ says online.  He  was an assistant U.S. attorney in Georgia from 1997 to 2001.
Before that   Wray  was an associate at King and Spalding from 1993 to 1997  according to  his  Senate Judiciary Committee questionnaire. From 1992 to 1993   he  was a clerk for Judge J. Michael Luttig  with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.

Ex Output:
no


Ex Input:
Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Rand Paul is Positive . The Senate passed a sweeping bipartisan spending bill Friday morning  but not before the federal government shut down when Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) delayed the vote past midnight to complain about the budget deficit. It was the second government shutdown in less than three weeks.
Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) on Feb. 8 spoke on the Senate floor against a bipartisan budget deal and delayed a vote on the measure. (U.S. Senate)
Then  as an expected vote approached in the Senate   Paul  began to throw up roadblocks  demanding a vote on  his  amendment that would demonstrate how the two-year budget deal breaks past pledges to rein in federal spending.
GOP leaders refused to allow  him  to offer the amendment  arguing that if  Paul  got an amendment vote  many other senators might want one  too.  Paul   in turn  refused to allow the vote to go forward  making use of Senate rules that allow individual senators to slow down proceedings that require the consent of all.
“I can’t in all good honesty  in all good faith  just look the other way because my party is now complicit in the deficits ”  Paul  said on the Senate floor as evening pushed into night.
 Paul  objected after a visibly irritated McConnell tried to move to a vote. Then  Paul  launched into a lengthy floor speech deriding bipartisan complicity on deficit spending while the country goes “on and on and on  finding new wars to fight that make no sense.” The senator direly predicted a “day of reckoning ” possibly in the form of the collapse of the stock market.
As the hours ticked on   Paul  repeatedly refused to consent to allowing the vote to happen  as lawmakers and aides of both parties grew increasingly annoyed at  him . Sen. John Cornyn (R-Tex.)  leaving the floor after an unsuccessful attempt to curtail  Paul ’s standoff  called the gambit “grossly irresponsible” and said that leaders would not entertain  his  demand for a vote.
Senators of both parties were left fuming  with most of their ire directed toward  Paul .
“ He  has mastered the art of ticking off  his  colleagues ” said Sen. Christopher A. Coons (D-Del.).
“It’s a colossal waste of everybody’s time ” said Sen. John Thune (R-S.D.). Of  Paul   Thune said  “He never gets a result.”
 Paul himself  made no apologies as  he  delivered one floor speech after another  casting  himself  as a lone defender of fiscal austerity  despite having voted in December for a tax bill that added at least $1 trillion to the debt.

Ex Output:
yes


Ex Input:
Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Robert Mueller is Positive . Two attorneys representing key Donald Trump associates say they consider it possible that  special counsel Robert Mueller  could end up indicting the president for obstruction of justice  Politico is reporting.
Neither attorney claimed to have inside information about  Mueller 's plans and based their comments on their understanding of the law  according to Politico.
But the website noted many legal experts maintain  Mueller  lacks the standing to bring charges against Trump.
Still  one of the lawyers  who represents a senior Trump official  said  Mueller  could try to indict the president even if the move brings challenges from Trump's attorneys.
"It's entirely possible that  Mueller  may go that route on the theory that  as an open question  it should be for the courts to decide " the attorney said. "Even if the indictment is dismissed  it puts maximum pressure on Congress to treat this with the independence and intellectual honesty that it will never  ever get."
And one legal expert maintained  Mueller  will never indict the president.
" Mueller  will not indict Trump for obstruction of justice or for any crime. Period. Full stop. End of story. Speculations to the contrary are just fantasy.

Ex Output:

no