In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: insult and non-insult. Insult is any lanugage or act that is disrespectful or scornfully abusive.

Example Input: Comment: Good point, any theocratic philosophy is a threat to constitutional democracy. Canada had a  blasphemy law. 

Violent theocrats are much worse - regardless of their religion. 

I only meant to say that The Premier was probably referring to violent Muslim theocrats which is essentially what an Islamist is. But the term is too close to Islamic and ends up stereotyping the religion. 

Given that the Ottoman empire ended just 100 years ago,  the link to religious rule is more recent in Islam. About the same time the Federal Reserve was created in America and they are still fighting about that!
Example Output: Non-insult

Example Input: Comment: LGBTQ do not "have children" as a couple. They had to use 3rd parties sperm, eggs or uterus to create a baby. No child has '2 mommies" or 2 daddies. There is ALWAYS 1 MOTHER AND 1 FATHER. That is Nature's way, and we mess with at our peril.
Example Output: Non-insult

Example Input: Comment: "authorities decided he was under the influence of drugs and or alcohol after he walked into a restricted area of the airport."  A paying, well behaved passenger is forcefully removed from a United Airlines flight and now a buzzed out whacko is allowed to board an American Airlines flight?  What the hell is wrong with this picture?!
Example Output:
Non-insult