In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

Example Input: Sentence: I stuck a pin through a carrot. When I pulled the pin out, it had a hole.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the carrot because They stabbed the carrot. Logically a hole would be left. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Example Output: Correct

Example Input: Sentence: There is a pillar between me and the stage, and I can't see around it .
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the pillar because since the pillar is in the way they probably can't see the stage. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Example Output: Correct

Example Input: Sentence: Adam can't leave work here until Bob arrives to replace him. If Bob had  left home for work on time, he would be gone by this time.
 Reason: The 'he' refers to adam because the idea of Adam is that he is a separate person from Bob, but if Bob has been dead. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Example Output:
Wrong