We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

[Q]: Civilians with other types of gun should be shot on sight by them.
[A]: Valid


[Q]: Another reason kalifornia's ban on open carry being wrong is the application of McDonald into the 14th Amendment of Civil Rights which bars States from infringing in any way on the right to keep and bear arms.
[A]: Valid


[Q]: It was felt by many (not all) at the time that such weapons were not military weapons and thus did not fall under the protection of the Second Amendment or the right to bear arms in their own state constitutions.
[A]:
Valid