In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine the neutral choice based on your inference from the statement and your commonsense knowledge. The neutral choice is a sentence that neither agrees nor disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3', corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence. If sentence X agrees with sentence Y, one's correctness follows from the other one. If sentence X disagrees with sentence Y, they can not be correct at the same time.

[EX Q]: Statement: 'Wouldn't that be extremely dangerous?' Choices: 1. I was concerned about the dangers involved.  2. That seems to be the safest route.  3. Would that not be hazardous?
[EX A]: 1

[EX Q]: Statement: (Well, for Skadden it's not such a mystery, considering that Slate is part of the name of the D.C. law firm Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher &amp; Flom.) Choices: 1. Slate is part of a law office's name. 2. Slate is not related to the law firm it shares a name with. 3. Slate is just a law firm.
[EX A]: 2

[EX Q]: Statement: (Our report on the Health Care Financing Administration Medicare Program Major Rule, B-275549, B-275552, December 9, 1996, discusses the good cause exception at length.) Choices: 1. The report on the Health Care Financing Administration Medicare Program Major Rule is a ruling against fiery hot spices. 2. The report on the Health Care Financing Administration Medicare Program Major Rule doesn't discuss the good cause exception at length. 3. The report on the Health Care Financing Administration Medicare Program Major Rule discusses the good cause exception at length.
[EX A]:
1