In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.
--------
Question: Comment: Maybe Mr Hill should not waited until 5 days before the vote to request a ballot . I live in Prince Edward Island and I call the office about 3 weeks before the deadline and a very nice young lady mailed me a ballot and I returned it the next day after it was received.  I assume that it got counted.  I  placed Mr Scheer second on my ballot and did not put Mr. Bernier in the top 10.  Mainly on the dairy issue. He should know that canada Post would not get it to him in time. Suck it up and move on.

Answer: Sexual-explicit


Question: Comment: You don't have a strong erection? Bummer for you. Try not drinking alcohol and exercise.

Answer: Sexual-explicit


Question: Comment: A sexually abusing priest needs to be removed and if sick provided with specialist assistance within the legal implications of his acts.
That is a far cry from a "sane" Bishop who fails to remove, fails to advise the legal authority, fails to protect the children, fails his vocation, fails Christ.
Your identification of the two is itself a perversity of minimal integrity.

Answer:
Sexual-explicit