In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: threat and non-threat. Threat is a statement that someone will be hurt or harmed, especially if the person does not do something in particular.

[Q]: Comment: You are free to try and talk him down.  Just know that if you are wrong you will suffer massive injury or death.  You might want to sell tickets to the show though because you are going to need them for your medical bills if you try it.
[A]: Threat


[Q]: Comment: And you believe that provocation is the best way to deal with lunatics?  The point of the comment is that diplomacy has not run out its course on this issue yet.  N-K only began its nuclear program in 2006, and its long time ally, China, has not applied its full weight on the issue.  US actions risk straining relations with China also.
[A]: Non-threat


[Q]: Comment: I don't know about your family, but in mine calling someone a "pervert" is cause for repentence and apology. Get out the soap mouthwash in my house.  I am especially annoyed by your venom on a site where Sr. Rose has thoughtfully and with care offered us expert insight and criticism of films she surely doesn't find perverse. You imply that by her positive reviews Sr. Rose is a complicit promoter and apologist for people who pervert, some of whom are her friends and colleagues---and that stance not only is baseless, it is cruel. Heck, it's indecent.
[A]:
Non-threat