In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Example Input: Comment: Durango?!? I'm ambivalent about Amazon picking Denver but please don't destroy the smaller towns in the state. Durango would become unrecognizable if they were sucked into the Amazon orbit.
Example Output: Non-sexual-explicit

Example Input: Comment: Trid sees nothing wrong with "No Dogs or Jews", "We don't serve Muslims" and so on. He supports bigotry. And no, that is NOT a straw man, but the clear and obvious implication of your " If either the buyer or the seller does not want to enter into that contract for whatever reason then I believe they have the right to refuse." Thank you for proving that your claim to being a Christian is a complete sham.
Example Output: Non-sexual-explicit

Example Input: Comment: Most comments seem to support a sexual lifestyle that is a mortally grave sin. No matter what Cardinal, priest or bishop that supports this lifestyle will not change the fact that active homosexual sexual activity is a mortal sin!  That will never change in Heaven. God will indeed pass judgment on those who lead his children away.
Example Output:
Sexual-explicit