In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Ex Input:
Comment: Zuma fires competent ministers but retains incompetenet lying ministers such as Dlamini. She should be fired as a minister and taken out of Parliament, as she makes a mockery of the institution. One wonders why she is allowed to act as she does-unilaterally. The other question that should be asked is whether she has paid the court costs and show proof that the payment was out of her own pocket

Ex Output:
Non-sexual-explicit


Ex Input:
Comment: I'm at fault for voting for his dad.--But I have learned my costly mistake.  My grandson a new voter and his pot head buddies voted for our little potato---and they are now saying---what a mistake.

Ex Output:
Non-sexual-explicit


Ex Input:
Comment: Be there for him but don't condone or make excuses. Trying to make it less than what it is won't help him! I have a brother who is a drug addict and alcoholic. He has done horrible things but mommy keeps bailing him out and excusing his behavior...it has made him worse! I feel for you, more than you'll ever know!! Also as a victim of sexual assault, anyone who "down plays" it is only hurting the victim and future victim's from reporting. Truth is whether it was just hot sauce or not it was a foreign object in a place it doesn't belong and that  is considered sodomy and that is a sexual assault! A finger up it without consent IS sexual assault. Please support your brother in love and love is truth! It is the only way to truly help him!

Ex Output:

Sexual-explicit