The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the self-need strategy, otherwise output No. self-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to create a personal need for an item in the negotiation, such as by pointing out that the participant sweats a lot to show preference towards water packages.

Context: 'You can all the food if you need it.🙂' 'Thanks!🙂 Do you need any water packages?' 'Yes. Since the days are on the warmer side, I'm a afraid of getting dehydrated. I would love to have all of it...'
Utterance: 'Ah, that doesn't work for me. I would need to have at least one water because one of mine has a leak (and I have an extra person joining me).'
Yes

Context: 'Hi, I would like to get 2 additional packages of food, 2 additional jugs of water, and 1 additional bundle of firewood. I need the additional food because I will have 3 children with me on the trip and one of those being a baby. The baby needs water for her bottles and I need an additional bundle of firewood to warm her bottles.'
Utterance: 'Hi, I appreciate your response. I would like to compromise. I will give you the bundle of firewood you requested as well as the 2 packages of food. However, I would like to get 2 jugs of water. I have 2 other adults with me on this trip and they require more water to stay hydrated than a baby would.'
No

Context: 'Great! Food is not my priority but water and food is.' 'awesome, you can have 3 water and i'll take 3 food?' '🙂 I am fine with it. How about the firewood?'
Utterance: 'i'll take 2, you can have 1? '

No