In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

[Q]: Comment: I blame this crap on Pete Carroll. He could have done the NFL a solid by signing Kaep, now we gotta hear about a QB who has never grown, and wants starter money in order to be a backup can't get a job for some reason, avoiding those listed above and making it a blackballed thing, oh joy.
[A]: Obscene


[Q]: Comment: Bishops are just like little boys who get caught being naughty, they resist getting punished!  But priests are expendable!  Always have been.  That's to keep bishops from getting punished!
[A]: Non-obscene


[Q]: Comment: I don't know that some deranged psycho who feels empowered to hurl insults is terrorism. 
The Portland incident ended in tragedy. 
I do believe that Chump has emboldened bigotry and that there will continue to be incidents such as this. Some will lead to violence, some will result in death. Chump doesn't give a rip about some little incident on a commuter train in Portland. He's got bigger fish to fry - like campaigning for reelection and shuffling his minions around.
[A]:
Non-obscene