In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Ex Input:
Comment: The Pope would do far better if he could just work a bit to wrap his mind around that ever-so-novel (and, yes, I am being VERY sarcastic here) concept that women are equal to men, and that women and men can be equally courageous and loving and good and bad and intelligent and capable, or ignorant and useless, or anything in between, as the case may be.  
And before anyone starts telling me about his age, etc, please be aware that the women's emancipation movement is MUCH older than the Pope, and the fact that, as a male, he chose to resist it, does not really give him much excuse.  Apparently, he has been wrong his entire life about this, and it's high time for him to take notice of that fact.

Ex Output:
Non-sexual-explicit


Ex Input:
Comment: Wait for it. Who knows what we'll see. Will Trump want to hug him? Hit him? Cuddle Him? Have you seen Trump's handshake with the Jap PM this morning? Trump looks even sillier than usual and has the Jap leader rolling his eyes because of an overlong and aggressive handshake. I can't stand Justin Trudeau, but I wish him well against this monumental creep on Monday. One a light-minded and handsome Canadian and the other a self-obsessed and literally "loud and obnoxious" American. The world is already watching Trump very closely and I think that Justin will stand out during and after his visit to D.C. - literally because of his good-looks. 21st century man.
I want to see how their handshakes go on Monday - that could tell it all.

Ex Output:
Non-sexual-explicit


Ex Input:
Comment: The Iroquois waged a war of extermination against the Huron. They eliminated the Huron as a people.

Ex Output:

Non-sexual-explicit