TASK DEFINITION: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.
PROBLEM: Comment: well done? how about ,, about bloody time!! they cried and opposed it when harper was Pm,, now for the photo op, not so much!!

SOLUTION: Obscene

PROBLEM: Comment: "It does seem a little hypocritical for Dogwood to be complaining about Kinder Morgan playing a role in the B.C. election through its donations to the BC Liberals, when it is receiving money from the United States to fight for causes aligned with interests there. "
In one case, foreign interests donate money to advocacy groups.
In the other, foreign interests donate money to a political party whose members currently form the provincial government. 
Not even remotely equivalent, Gary, and tf. hardly hypocritical of Dogwood to complain about it.

SOLUTION: Non-obscene

PROBLEM: Comment: I think you missed the point and didn't answer the question.  So he did it because he could.  So what?  How did he advance his agenda by embarrassing and probably ticking off severely the person who has the power to grant the favourable treatment he seeks?

The PMO can at any time instruct whichever applicable departments to tell this guy and his buddies to take a hike, make a wrong turn and get lost.

SOLUTION:
Non-obscene