We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

[Q]: If individual citizens should not, in your view, be permitted to own firearms, them make your case and let the amendment process work to make your view the law of the land.
[A]: Valid


[Q]: "We could even grant animals a right to bring suit without insisting that animals are persons, or that they are not property," Sunstein said on page 11 of Animal Rights: Current Debates and New Directions (2004).
[A]: Invalid


[Q]: If you thought sharks with lasers was bad XXX, wait until you see bees with lasers and poisonous metal stingers and little speakers that can play the Flight of the Bumble Bee as performed by Black Sabbath.
[A]:
Invalid