We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

Ex Input:
Or that someone has pointed out that gun rights advocates seem to have been panic-buying firearms in case the White House bans them?

Ex Output:
Valid


Ex Input:
The courts up to the supreme court have held that criminals can't be made to register guns.

Ex Output:
Valid


Ex Input:
I call it an article because it's not the actual study that we were linked to, merely the abstract of the study that gives tidbits of information but not the overall picture.

Ex Output:

Valid