In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Example Input: Comment: Being a Jerk is lauded because its a backlash against strangers deciding they get to police what others say, do, and think.  its a backlash against americanized westerners complaining about cultural appropriation when white people wear a kimono (cultural japanese aren't bothered by this) and similar behaviors.  Its a backlash against being fired and or harassed by those who are so certain they're on the right side of history if you refuse to make use of random nontraditional pronouns (outside of he/she/they and derivatives).  A backlash against people who think dragging someone through the social media wringer over a 50's pinup shirt is an appropriate response.

The professor deserves a reprimand and a healthy "what the fuck were you thinking" conversation  with their peers.  Termination isn't likely to do anything but cost money and instead of a thoughtless act, create an active antagonist to the behaviors the college hopes to instill.
Example Output: Non-sexual-explicit

Example Input: Comment: I agree with Ms. McAnulty! I wonder what reaction there would be if a bunch of guys wore red cock and blue balls hats and marched around the city center. I expect it would be negative in the extreme no matter what they were protesting or supporting. There are certainly better ways to express dissatisfaction with President Trump than to stoop to vulgarity which is what I consider was done by those who marched with their pink genitalia hats.
Example Output: Sexual-explicit

Example Input: Comment: It's Butts that Trudeau needs to fire more than Morneau.  Every attempt to put out the flames on this backlash just make it worse.
Example Output:
Sexual-explicit