TASK DEFINITION: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.
PROBLEM: Comment: Any income they receive from their "story" should go towards the cost of rescue from their fraudulent experience.

SOLUTION: Non-obscene

PROBLEM: Comment: You are all of you so stupid. Where was the dog? The dog was on his owners property. The shooter broke the law, the shooter was not in danger. The shooter aimed at a sitting still dog. The dog had a shock collar that kept it inside the property. The shooter should be charged with destruction of property, harassment, and unlawful discharge of a weapon in city limits. Throw the GOD DAMN BOOK AT HIM!

SOLUTION: Obscene

PROBLEM: Comment: This is embarrassing .... for Romney and Bush

"Uniting the Country", as they suggest Trump do would mean we reject racial bigotry and violence based on racism while tacitly accepting violence committed in the name of quashing Free Speech.

Both are heinous and both should be called out.   Why are middle-road Neo Conservatives always foolishly ending up as tools of left wing narratives?

SOLUTION:
Non-obscene