We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Sent1: The death penalty has not been shown to be more effective than life imprisonment in deterring murder, hence we should choose life imprisonment.
 Sent2: But the statistics don't support the idea that the death penalty is any more effective as a detterent than is a life sentence.
Similar

Sent1: The crime rate was higher after the death penalty than before it.
 Sent2: There's absolutely ZERO evidence that having a death penalty statute causes a lower crime rate, period.
Similar

Sent1: An argument for putting people to death is so that they can never escape and kill again.
 Sent2: If a person just raped someone (this is just an example) they shouldn't be killed for it, but something like a mass murdering or serial killing should be dealt with by putting them to death.

Not similar