instruction:
In this task, you will be shown a sentence, and you should determine whether it is overruling or non-overruling. In law, an overruling sentence is a statement that nullifies a previous case decision as a precedent by a constitutionally valid statute or a decision by the same or higher ranking court which establishes a different rule on the point of law involved. Classify your answers into overruling or non-overruling
question:
any language in people v. harrison, 176 cal.app.2d 330, 335 [ 1 cal.rptr. 414], which could be understood as being in conflict with the views expressed herein is disapproved.
answer:
overruling


question:
we disapprove of miller v. miller, 848 s.w.2d 344 (tex.app.  texarkana 1993, no writ), el paso sharky's billiard parlor, inc. v. amparan, 831 s.w.2d 3 (tex.app.  el paso 1992, writ denied), and any other authorities in which the court of appeals has dismissed an appeal when the appellant has made a bona fide attempt to invoke the appellate court's jurisdiction by filing a bond within the fifteen days of the date the bond was due.
answer:
overruling


question:
kinsel v. lindsey, 526 s.w.3d 411, 419 (tex. 2017).
answer:

non-overruling