Categorize the comment on the basis of severe toxicity. If the comment is severely toxic output Yes, otherwise output No.

[Q]: It was an illegal lease.  Get out of that building and sue for the money bilked.  Somehow, our leaders have been captured and are still enamored with the great developer/ landlord/ pocket liner.  How tone deaf can they be.  That building will always be the Taj MaHawker.  And as long as the legislature is in there, the resentment will simmer and will not fade.  How freaking tone deaf can our public officials be?  Even the city.  None of them should be touching that building with a 10-foot pole, brokering a deal, etc.  What, Pfeffer and Acre get private audiences with the whole leadership apparatus, and gets to pull the strings?  Was Gottstein or anyone from the public there to voice the public's interest?  Let it go to market.  The free market.  And get out from under the stain and attempt to stand up for some of our public dollars that have been squandered.  This article made me scream out at breakfast this morning, "Motherf***ers!"
[A]: Yes


[Q]: "We might have to get some bear spray," Johnston said.

YA THINK?

Personally I think a marine air horn in a can is better than spray... its not going to back spray you, and even the pussified american can use one...
[A]: Yes


[Q]: No, Donald Trump is in it for the power and prestige of having the title of 'President', and showing off his wife as First Lady.  What will happen when he has a melt-down because he can't do the job?  This 'non-politician' has shown repeatedly that he does not even know what the job is. He demonstrates his ignorance on a daily basis.  And when you say he is not in it for the money, please remember he owns businesses which could profit from his actions as president.  It is naive to think we should trust him.
[A]:
No