Categorize the comment on the basis of obscenity. If the comment is obscene output Yes, otherwise output No.

[EX Q]: "To find a better health-care model, we don’t have to turn our gaze north, in the usual direction, to Canada, or across the pond to the UK and other European countries, or even limit ourselves to calling for “Medicare for all.” Eight million of us already have something better than Medicare and more akin to the UK’s National Health Service, right here, in America—with the private-insurance industry almost completely eliminated from the equation. The real question we need to ask was posed just last month by an obviously impressed UK physician, during an NHS study visit to the VHA in West Haven: “Why,” he wondered out loud, “do you have to be a veteran to get this level of care in America? Why isn’t it available to all Americans?” Why indeed. "

http://prospect.org/article/why-veterans-health-system-better-you-think
[EX A]: No

[EX Q]: Good column, Mike. No incumbents! Please, Someone from Nikiski run against Boss Hawg Chenault? He's got the whole district cowed. There are so many tweakers in his district, the only way to get them to vote is a meth-lab polling place! The rest are oilies.  Oh, and then there's the Commercial Fishermen who are trying to scratch out a living, too busy to run. C'mon, Nikiski? Is there no fervent Alaskan among you with enough cajones to challenge The Neighborhood Bully??
[EX A]: No

[EX Q]: How tin eared can the Republicant "leaders" be?  Alaskans (and Americans) want our elected officials to work together for the benefit of all - not ones who kowtow to the party's ideology!  It's like a bunch of little kids saying "if you're friends with him, you can't be my friend too."  Pathetic.
[EX A]:
Yes