In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence can be inferred from the statement. Incorrect choices change the meaning in important ways or have details that are not mentioned in the statement. Indicate your answer as 1,2, or 3 corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.

Statement: He has two law partners, Lori Mannicci and Linda Gardner. Choices:  1. He has known these partners for almost a decade. 2. he has no way of getting into contact with any members in law. 3. He has partners in law.
3

Statement: The thundering Republican condemnations of the special prosecutor back then are just like the thundering Democratic condemnations today, down to the very phrase, four years and $40 million. Choices:  1. The thundering Republic condemnations back then are similar in many ways to the thundering Democratic condemnations of today.  2. The thundering Republican condemnations are in no way similar to the thundering Democratic condemnations. 3. The thundering Republican condemnations are four years and $40 million. 
3

Statement: It spills down the side of a hill between the Castelo de Sao Jorge and the Tagus with all the color and bustle of an Arab bazaar. Choices:  1. There is a lot of color and bustle there. 2. It is a dull and boring place. 3. The hill is very gently sloped.

1