We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

Example Input: You can debate that without guns there would be more deaths to other weapons although you can't debate it would be to the same extent as gun murders and crimes would be.
Example Output: Valid

Example Input: These are the people that believe in bigger government, nanny states, government handouts, less responsibility for people, less freedom for the people, more laws, even more laws after that, legalizing all manner of drugs and behaviors while outlawing others, etc.
Example Output: Valid

Example Input: The ought to be designated as laws not preventative but fearful of crimes, produced by the tumultuous impression of a few isolated facts, and not by thoughtful consideration of the inconveniences and advantages of a universal decree."
Example Output:
Valid