In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Ex Input:
Comment: The authors of the  JJ report insist that homosexuality played no role in the abuse crisis, but their own data undermine this conclusion. For example, they plainly admit that “81% of the victims [between 1950 and 2002] were male,” and that 78% were post-pubescent.

So if the abusers weren’t pedophiles, and the victims were mostly adolescent males, wouldn’t that make the victimizers homosexuals?

What else could we possibly be talking about if not homosexuality?

Why can't you answer this question?

Ex Output:
Non-obscene


Ex Input:
Comment: I can't follow this darn tax proposal or its implications no matter how many times I read articles on it. 

But the bottom line is that doctors are being asked to pay more tax and as high earners they should accept what must be a pretty small burden.

Ex Output:
Obscene


Ex Input:
Comment: Same old shit. Yawn. I will pay attention when these guys and gals start talking economics rather than politics,

Ex Output:

Obscene