instruction:
In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.
question:
Comment: You know nothing about vegans or vegetarians, then you go and lump them into the SAME category as "food fetishists"!  Like those young men in the Book of Daniel, yes?
answer:
Non-sexual-explicit


question:
Comment: I did not say anything about Adams, I simply asked you a question. You are a waste of ink space fish...you are too inconsistent.
answer:
Non-sexual-explicit


question:
Comment: Finishing up here, the underlying problem I see is that either through direct coordination with the Clinton campaign (thank you Wikileaks), or through a desire to drive up ratings/profits, the mainstream media has been taking many of Trump's words out of context and intentionally stoking fear and racism across party lines for the past year. At the same time, any stories about HRC's actual racism, like having the young woman removed by security at a press conference when she dared to ask about the "super predator" comment from the 90s, were completely buried. Now that Trump has been elected, the media is going into overdrive to drive people apart. Quick to blame Trump, blame some absurd Russian conspiracy theory, cast al his supporters as racist and ignorant, but dont talk about real policy issues. Dont talk about widespread police abuse, make it about race. Dont talk about widespread poverty, make it about race. Dont talk about lost jobs across the board, make it about race.
answer:

Non-sexual-explicit