We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.
--------
Question: Sent1: If someone is bad enough to be considered for the death penalty then they must have had sure evidence that they are guilty if they are then they shouldn't deserve the right to live among people they could kill
 Sent2: There have been numerous people who were presumed innocent after execution because the evidence showed that they were not guilty.

Answer: Not similar


Question: Sent1: Therefore, people will think twice before they choose to commit a crime and also, the death penalty has been proven to deter the crime rate.
 Sent2: The thing is, without the death penalty there is absolutely no deterrent from committing heinous crimes.

Answer: Similar


Question: Sent1: if one cannot be rehabiliated in prison, they should be eliminated.
 Sent2: If the person in question is in prison, they are removed from society.

Answer:
Not similar