In this task you are given a disfluent question, a proper question and a context. A disfluent question is a question that has some interruptions in it while framing and a proper question is the correct form of the question without any disfluency. Classify whether the question is answerable or not based on the given context.

[Q]: proper question: When was the heyday of secular non-Arab nationalism? 
 disfluent question: What does er when was the heyday of secular non-Arab nationalism? 
 context: Islamists have asked the question, If Islam is a way of life, how can we say that those who want to live by its principles in legal, social, political, economic, and political spheres of life are not Muslims, but Islamists and believe in Islamism, not [just] Islam? Similarly, a writer for the International Crisis Group maintains that the conception of 'political Islam' is a creation of Americans to explain the Iranian Islamic Revolution and apolitical Islam was a historical fluke of the short-lived era of the heyday of secular Arab nationalism between 1945 and 1970, and it is quietist/non-political Islam, not Islamism, that requires explanation.
[A]: No


[Q]: proper question: What protocol was popular in the 1970s and 80s for Apple? 
 disfluent question: What protocol was popular in the 1980s and 90s no the 70s and 80s for Apple? 
 context: AppleTalk was a proprietary suite of networking protocols developed by Apple Inc. in 1985 for Apple Macintosh computers. It was the primary protocol used by Apple devices through the 1980s and 90s. AppleTalk included features that allowed local area networks to be established ad hoc without the requirement for a centralized router or server. The AppleTalk system automatically assigned addresses, updated the distributed namespace, and configured any required inter-network routing. It was a plug-n-play system.
[A]: No


[Q]: proper question: What company was Bedau a part of while breaking the law by bringing medicine to Iraq? 
 disfluent question: How was or rather what company was Bedau a part of while breaking the law by bringing medicine to Iraq? 
 context: Civil disobedients have chosen a variety of different illegal acts. Bedau writes, There is a whole class of acts, undertaken in the name of civil disobedience, which, even if they were widely practiced, would in themselves constitute hardly more than a nuisance (e.g. trespassing at a nuclear-missile installation)...Such acts are often just a harassment and, at least to the bystander, somewhat inane...The remoteness of the connection between the disobedient act and the objectionable law lays such acts open to the charge of ineffectiveness and absurdity. Bedau also notes, though, that the very harmlessness of such entirely symbolic illegal protests toward public policy goals may serve a propaganda purpose. Some civil disobedients, such as the proprietors of illegal medical cannabis dispensaries and Voice in the Wilderness, which brought medicine to Iraq without the permission of the U.S. Government, directly achieve a desired social goal (such as the provision of medication to the sick) while openly breaking the law. Julia Butterfly Hill lived in Luna, a 180-foot (55 m)-tall, 600-year-old California Redwood tree for 738 days, successfully preventing it from being cut down.
[A]:
No