In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

[EX Q]: Comment: I think you ought to review the data on primaries. Sanders has won total of 19 state contests...most of his wins were in states that do not have primaries. Instead, like Alaska, they have caucuses. In Alaska, less than 550 people participated in the Democratic caucuses. There are apartment complexes in Anchorage with more people than that. Where everyone actually gets a chance to vote in primaries Clinton has won overwhelmingly. That is why she has more than 3,000,000 more votes than Sanders. You are entitled too your own opinions, but not your own facts.
[EX A]: Non-sexual-explicit

[EX Q]: Comment: Is slapping a woman's butt a sexual assault? Really? Are the buttocks defined as a sexual organ? Since Gwen Jacobs' toplessness crusade, breasts are not considered sexual organs... you'd have a hard time convincing a judge that buttocks are, methinks.
[EX A]: Sexual-explicit

[EX Q]: Comment: Folks, there has to be way more to this story.   This is a HUGE COVER UP !!!!!   Was Mr. Rand Paul having sex with his wife, or daughter, or grand daughter or son something.  This is a 4th degree misdemeanor assault and the good senator isn't talking.  There is some sex, drugs, or money involved here, and you better believe It !!!!!!   If this guy randomly attacked a U.S. Senator on his property, that is a 1st or 2nd degree assault.  There is a lot of sensitive information missing here and no one is talking.  Mr.Rand Paul did something wrong........

For sure.
[EX A]:
Sexual-explicit