We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

[EX Q]: Sent1: Since that ruling most lower federal courts have continued to reject the argument that the second amendment protects an indivual right to own a gun.
 Sent2: What you've been doing isn't a debate about gun control, it's criticism of the Supreme Court for saying the Second Amendment protects an individual right to own a gun for legal purposes.
[EX A]: Not similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: Their argument is hardly valid, they want to stop the selling of firearms to people because they think it will decrease the crimes and school shootings along with other dangers that are caused by guns.
 Sent2: So if its cause people in high crime areas want to buy guns for protection then why do they only want protection against gun murders but not other crimes.
[EX A]: Not similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: 'Gun control' does not mean a ban on all self-defence
 Sent2: Less gun control probably means more criminals will have guns, however it also means more civilian lives will be saved.
[EX A]:
Not similar