In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

[Q]: Comment: The same Goldman Sachs that Trump was blasting Clinton about? What a flip-flopping lying piece of crap he is.
[A]: Obscene


[Q]: Comment: you overestimated the integrity of the electorates.

They repeatedly elected the provably  corrupt Liberals.
[A]: Non-obscene


[Q]: Comment: Prorogue
Harper proroguing Parliament was to stop an UNDEMOCRATIC attempt by the sore losers to form a Coalition to steal the election from the winning Conservatives
.
it was pathetic watching such "democrats" as Chretien and Ed Broadbent trotting up Parliament Hill with that intention
.
Proroguing by Harper is a tool in the Rule Book, so it is not undemocratic at all
[A]:
Non-obscene