Given a document, an entity and its sentiment towards the entity, verify if it is the correct sentiment towards the entity. Answer should be yes or no. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

Q: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Nikki Haley is Positive . The vote came after  U.S. Ambassador Nikki Haley  issued a stern warning United Nations that the United States "will remember" countries that voted for the measure.
 Haley  hinted that U.S. financial support for the U.N. is not guaranteed and that the U.S. should not be expected to support an organization that condemned it.
"The United States is by far the single largest contributor to the United Nations "  she  said  noting that "our participation in the U.N. produces great good for the world."
 Haley  said "the United States will remember this day" when it was "singled out for attack."
"America will put our embassy in Jerusalem "  Haley  said  adding that "no vote in the United Nations will make any difference on that. But this vote will make a difference on how Americans look on the U.N."

A: yes
****
Q: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Benjamin Netanyahu is Neutral . Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu  accompanied by  his  wife Sara cuts the ribbon during the opening ceremony for a bomb-proof emergency room in a hospital in Ashkelon  Israel  Tuesday  Feb. 20  2018. (Tsafrir Abayov/Associated Press)
JERUSALEM â  Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu  is fighting for  his  political life as a dizzying array of scandals has engulfed  him    his  family and  his  inner circle.
Police last week announced they have sufficient evidence to indict  Netanyahu  for bribery  fraud and breach of trust in two separate cases. And this week  a new case emerged that threatens to be the most damaging of all  after one of his closest confidants agreed to testify against him in an influence-peddling scandal.
 Netanyahu  and  his  wife  Sara  have long been saddled with a penchant for expensive tastes and questionable use of public funds.  Netanyahu  has denied all wrongdoing and accuses the media of orchestrating a campaign aimed at ousting him from office.
But with those closest to him under intense police and public scrutiny  and his typically loyal political allies suddenly turning silent   Netanyahu  faces the stiffest challenge yet to  his  lengthy rule.
Police have recommended indicting  Netanyahu  over accepting nearly $300 000 in gifts from Hollywood mogul Arnon Milchan and Australian billionaire James Packer. Police say that in return for lavish gifts that included jewelry  expensive cigars and champagne   Netanyahu  had operated on Milchanâs behalf on U.S. visa matters  tried to legislate a generous tax break for  him  and sought to promote  his  interests in the Israeli media market.
Police have not commented on what Packer may have received  and  Netanyahu  has said everything  he  received were gifts from friends. Attorney General Avihai Mandelblit  a  Netanyahu  appointee  will make the final decision on whether to file charges â a process that is expected to take several months.
Police have also recommended indicting  Netanyahu  for supposedly offering a newspaper publisher legislation that would weaken  his  paperâs main rival in return for more favorable coverage.  Netanyahu  reportedly was recorded asking Arnon Mozes  the publisher of the Yediot Ahronot daily  for positive coverage in exchange for helping to weaken Israel Hayom  a free pro-Netanyahu newspaper that had cut into Yediotâs business.
Israel Hayom is financed by  Netanyahuâs  American billionaire friend Sheldon Adelson and largely serves as the prime ministerâs mouthpiece.  Netanyahu  has noted that a proposed law to weaken Israel Hayom never passed  and this week said  he  had even dissolved  his  coalition and called a new election in 2015 because of  his  opposition to the proposal.  The attorney general  will have to rule on this case as well.
This week two close  Netanyahu  confidants were arrested on suspicion of promoting regulation worth hundreds of millions of dollars to Israelâs Bezeq telecom company. In return  Bezeqâs popular news site  Walla  allegedly provided favorable coverage of  Netanyahu  and  his  family. Nir Hefetz  a former  Netanyahu  family spokesman  and Shlomo Filber  the former director of the Communications Ministry under  Netanyahu   are in custody as well as Bezeqâs controlling shareholder Shaul Elovitch  along with his wife  son and other top Bezeq executives.
Former journalists at the Walla news site have attested to being pressured to refrain from negative reporting of  Netanyahu .  Netanyahu   who held the communications portfolio until last year  has not yet been named as a suspect in the case but is expected to be questioned. Filber has reportedly agreed to turn state witness against  Netanyahu  in return for a lesser sentence.
 Netanyahu  has not been named as a suspect  but some of  his  closest associates have been implicated in probe related to a possible conflict of interest involving a $2 billion purchase of German submarines.  Netanyahu âs personal attorney  who is also  his  cousin  represented the German firm involved and is suspected of using  his  influence over the prime minister in return for a hefty cut of the deal.
As if  Netanyahu  didnât have enough problems  police said Tuesday that Hefetz  his former media adviser  is suspected of trying to bribe a judge in exchange for dropping a corruption case against the Israeli leaderâs wife. Hefetz is suspected of suggesting  through a middleman  to Judge Hila Gerstel in 2015 that she could be appointed attorney general if she dismissed a pending case against Sara Netanyahuâs excessive household spending.

A: no
****
Q: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Manfra is Positive . The logo of Russia's Kaspersky Lab is on displayat the company's office in Moscow  Russia October 27  2017.  REUTERS/Maxim Shemetov
Jeanette Manfra  assistant secretary for cyber security at the Department of Homeland Security (DHS )  said that 94 percent of agencies had responded to an order to survey their networks to identify any use of Kaspersky Lab products and to remove them.
 Manfra  told a U.S. House of Representatives panel the DHS did ânot currently have conclusive evidenceâ that any networks had been breached because of their use of Kaspersky software.
Ninety-six of 102 federal agencies have reported to DHS on whether they have found Kaspersky Lab software on their networks   Manfra  told the oversight subcommittee of the House Science  Space and Technology Committee.
DHS is working with the remaining six âvery smallâ agencies to assess their networks   Manfra  said.  She  did not name the agencies that detected Kaspersky Lab products or those that were still auditing their systems. The government was generally complying with the directive to remove the software   Manfra  said.
 She  told lawmakers it was possible the action against Kaspersky Lab could prompt litigation  but  she  did not elaborate. Asked if the company is considering suing the U.S. government  a spokeswoman for Kaspersky Lab said in a statement that the company âcontinues to consider all possible options.â
 Manfra  said  she  became personally aware of concerns about the firm in 2014  and that while DHS promptly took steps to remove software  other agencies may have lagged in part because they did not have access to classified information.
The companyâs products generally appeared to land on U.S. government networks through larger technology purchases that included Kaspersky Lab products as pre-bundled software  making it more difficult to track  according to  Manfra  and other officials who were testifying on Tuesday.
 Manfra  said such a step  while welcomed  would ânot be sufficientâ to address concerns the U.S. government has about Kaspersky Lab.

A:
yes
****