We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

Ex Input:
If there was no such law for guns, carriers would be in the same boat as black people walking past a "No Negroes" sign.

Ex Output:
Valid


Ex Input:
Walk into a school and tell the principle it is your constitutional right to have a gun there.

Ex Output:
Valid


Ex Input:
That means currently the federal government has absolutely no way to determine who did own a "high capacity ammunition magazine" before the ban and who didn't, and this fact would make enforcement of the transfer ban impossible.

Ex Output:

Valid