Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
--------
Question: There's nothing new here to indicate that any shots of public finance sanity has  slipped into the Senate Majority's afternoon martinis. .. unfortunately ... Do the veto Governor!! Sooner or later, either before or after the election, they'll come around ..

Answer: No


Question: Thanks Nathan for shinning the light into one of those dark corners of how the legislature conducts the "public's business".  My cynical view of this last week of the regular session is that none of these hearings matter.  Nobody's listening in Juneau and nobody cares; the deals are already made as to what will and won't pass.  The only real legislative crafting is on the budget and finance related issues; and the public will never see what is happening behind all those locked close doors.
Makes one wish for a state constitutional convention to set up a bunch of dedicated funds (like education in Texas) and narrow legislative discretion.  Pretty sure we can come up with a decision app that's smarter then these 60 "representatives" and a computer accounting system that has some integrity.  How about a legislative monitoring committee populated with only public members.  Give it the power of the pen.

Answer: Yes


Question: Rich,white people can't soil their hands by actually handing a $20 bill to a homeless person..They have to buy a "designer" cake from another,rich,white person,have them hand the money to a charity,and then have the charity buy the homeless person a meal (after taking a 50% cut of the donation,of course)..LOL

Answer:
Yes