We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

[Q]: So I argue that 3000 years of use does provide evidence that capital punishment works.
[A]: Valid


[Q]: That mood being TOTALLY wrong for him, I got him in private and asked if he had problems with me , or anything else going on at work.
[A]: Invalid


[Q]: And what message would your widow deliver to your daughter when she explains how the family of the rapist you killed took THEIR revenge by killing you?emoticonXBanghead
[A]:
Valid