In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

[Q]: Comment: Let me know when "black" Supremacist create a national group that has been around for a century or more, have killed thousands, and have had the backing of many a politician. And today, they have a huge media empire, with support of talk radio, many books published read all over the world that also supports a massive campaign to convert the weak minded ( Acts a lot like ISIS) to their cause and today commits acts of domestic terrorism in this nation at the rate of double any other hate group, which is one that has to meet strict criteria to be formally be characterized as a "hate" group in America by the FBI. So tell me when that happens. And Obama did not make a "white" male in this nation unhappy. Some White men heard the dog whistles that they were being mistreated as people of other "colors" were getting stuff they weren't "getting", these White men "embraced" fully and 100% their victimhood, they earned it. .
[A]: Identity-attack


[Q]: Comment: No, not common knowledge to the vast majority.  It's simply an opinion held by those who fall for the sore loser propaganda.
[A]: Non-identity-attack


[Q]: Comment: You prove the point.  White males make up maybe 35% of Canada's population (depending on who is included as "white").  So why do you think white male identity is the norm when really you're just another minority identity group?

And of course who is included as "white" is a whole other topic.  If you're a Syrian immigrant you're not white, whereas maybe if you're the son of a Syrian immigrant, say Steve Jobs, you would be welcomed in the Proud Boys' fantasy of white Western men who invented everything of value the modern world.
[A]:
Identity-attack