We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

Input: Consider Input: Funny they weren't interested when 'they' were buying guns to give cartels by the truckload and were notified by the dealers.

Output: Valid


Input: Consider Input: You can't just claim "Country A has more gun control and a lower homicide rate than Country B does" and leave it at that.

Output: Valid


Input: Consider Input: The bill also calls for each gun owner to be fingerprinted, have a back ground check, and to submit pass port-style photos for registration cards.


Output: Valid