In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence can be inferred from the statement. Incorrect choices change the meaning in important ways or have details that are not mentioned in the statement. Indicate your answer as 1,2, or 3 corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.

Example Input: Statement: More generally, we need to comprehensively examine opportunities for better using the federal government's career SES leadership. Choices:  1. We need to find more ways to destroy the government's SES leadership program.  2. We need to look for opportunities to use SES leadership in a better way.  3. The school board needs to look for better ways to use SES leadership from the government. 
Example Output: 2

Example Input: Statement: Here was an obviously experienced man coming into this young upstart's company, probably extremely well-dressed and with credentials earned before the CEO was even born. Choices:  1. He was not experienced at all, now does he have credentials or impeccable dress.  2. He worked exceptionally hard to make it into this company and spent his money to achieve the right credentials and clothing.  3. He was an exceptionally experienced man starting in this young company, well dressed with all the right credentials. 
Example Output: 3

Example Input: Statement: Monaghan's (Grafton Arcade) specializes in cashmere. Choices:  1. Monaghan's is the got to store for cashmere items. 2. Monaghan's specializes in medicine. 3. Cashmere is sold at Monaghan's.
Example Output:
3