We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.
--------
Question: JUSTICE STEVENS believes that the unitary meaning of ���keep and bear Arms��� is established by the Second Amendment's calling it a ���right��� (singular) rather than ���rights��� (plural).

Answer: Valid


Question: If the Founding Fathers were referring to keeping and bearing arms for ANY legitimate purpose, they would have said so, in a SINGLE sentence or Amendment.

Answer: Valid


Question: The criminals already have plenty of guns, that means that ending gun ownership will play no real part in ending gun possession by criminals.

Answer:
Valid