In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

Ex Input:
Comment: The author of this little piece of trashy fiction should be fired.

Ex Output:
Non-identity-attack


Ex Input:
Comment: Someone is staying busy deleting posts that are perfectly acceptable but don't agree with this article.   It's hilarious and pathetic at the same time that people who write these opinions, are so thin skinned that they cannot accept that other people have a difference of opinion and can't deal with the fact that their words are not treated like they came down from God.

Ex Output:
Non-identity-attack


Ex Input:
Comment: The trial was for legal drama, not for any real practical reason other than to help victims feel better about getting justice. So whatever monies spent on that above and beyond what doing the plea deal involved (assuming that included life with no parole) were wasted. 

I don't understand what the "deep concern" by victims and families is about, how that is above any concern held by the general public. He's not getting out. As to not disclosing the specific location (for the reasons stated), that is just plain stupid. What is solved or made better by not disclosing the location? Unless we're talking about a witness protection program within the federal prison system, it's a "secret" that's not going to be kept very long anyway, so what's the secret squirrel policy about?

Ex Output:

Non-identity-attack