In this task, you're given a statement, and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence clearly disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3' corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.

[EX Q]: Statement: It was applied pro bono by attorney Robert Hamrick at the Schwabe Williamson &amp Choices:  1. Attorney Robert Hamrick did not apply it pro bono. 2. Attorney Robert Hamrick was being charitable by doing it pro bono. 3. Attorney Robert Hamrick applied it pro bono.
[EX A]: 1

[EX Q]: Statement: I'd touched a nerve. Choices:  1. He wasn't bothered by it. 2. Talking about the cult had gotten under his skin. 3. I had upset him.
[EX A]: 1

[EX Q]: Statement: In fact, when you look at its 4,000 years of history or any of today's newspapers, for that matter its countless feuds seem to be a perpetual but necessary dynamic of Indian civilization. Choices:  1. India is always a peaceful place with hardly any unrest. 2. Indian civilians have come to regard feuds as commonplace. 3. The country of India has had a large amount of feuds in its 4,000 years.
[EX A]:
1