In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: insult and non-insult. Insult is any lanugage or act that is disrespectful or scornfully abusive.

Q: Comment: All methods of reducing dental decay should be employed - It's something to consider.

Explain how, when water containing 0.7 mg/l fluoride ions has never been considered a medication, fluoridation opponents can claim the water treatment method is forced medication.  It would be like me claiming disinfection is forced poisoning and demanding that it be stopped.  Chlorine gas is a known chemical weapon, bleach is a strong poison that no one would want to drink, and studies on disinfection byproducts have shown they are poisonous at high exposure levels - would you want to drink a glass of chloroform?

Fluoridation opponents invent definitions to fit their agenda when there is absolutely no support for those claims.

A: Non-insult
****
Q: Comment: Idiots are perfectly legal, as a issue of educational standards, that is not condescending, but collaborative fact.

A: Insult
****
Q: Comment: Funny.  But MikeinAK26 is basically right.  Flood your society with guns, and killing is the inevitable result.

A:
Non-insult
****