TASK DEFINITION: We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.
PROBLEM: Sent1: So what does he have to do with a debate like this about murderers and the death penalty?
 Sent2: C: The main CON argument against capital punishment is that he should have second chance.

SOLUTION: Not similar

PROBLEM: Sent1: if you execute a pickpocket or give him life imprisonment, then you would have one less thief to worry about but I think we agree that that would be excessive).
 Sent2: Also, I wonder if a criminal thinks of the punishment when he commits the crime - if he were counting on being punished, he wouldn't have done it.

SOLUTION: Not similar

PROBLEM: Sent1: I think death penalties should be allowed for harsh offenses.
 Sent2: I don't believe the death penalty should be allowed for circumstantial evidenc.

SOLUTION:
Not similar