In this task, you are given a passage which has a question and the context. You have to generate an answer to the question based on the information present in the context.

Input: Consider Input: Context: Re-stenosis after percutaneous coronary angioplasty (PTCA) is related to clinical and angiographic features.', 'To describe the clinical and angiographic characteristic of our patients with coronary cardiopathy subjected to PTCA and the predictor factors for re-stenosis.', 'We gathered the clinical and angiographic characteristics of all patients who underwent a successful PTCA of a native coronary artery. All patients had a clinical assessment one year after the procedure. Patients were classified in Group 1, if they did not have angina or coronary events after the angioplasty or Group 2, if they had angina or a coronary event after the procedure. Only Group 2 patients were subjected to a coronary angiogram.', 'We collected 383 PTCA procedures. Follow up information was obtained in 92.2%. Three hundred forty two patients (89.3%) were assessed one year the procedure. Nine patients (2.3%) died of a cardiovascular cause. Ninety patients (26.3%) were classified in Group 2. In 65 patients, angiographic re-stenosis was demonstrated (19%). Re-stenosis occurred in 36 and 13% of patients with an without Diabetes Mellitus, respectively (p <0.01). The other clinical predictor variables were a history of myocardial infarction (p =0.007), obesity (p =0.041) and hypercholesterolemia (p =0.050). None of the angiographic characteristics predicted restenosis. Stents were protective factors against restenosis (15.6% in stented lesions vs 25.4% in nonstented; p =0.01).\Question: Do [ One year follow up of successful coronary angioplasty in non selected patients ]?

Output: Re-stenosis after angioplasty occurred in 19% of our patients with angina or coronary events. The clinical variables associated with a higher risk of re-stenosis were diabetes (the main risk factor), previous myocardial infarction, obesity and hypercholesterolemia. Angiographic variables were not associated with re-stenosis. The use of stents decreases the incidence of re-stenosis in all groups).


Input: Consider Input: Context: Right ventricular rupture, resulting in serious bleeding, is a life-threatening complication associated with negative-pressure wound therapy (NPWT) in cardiac surgery. The use of a rigid barrier between the heart and the sharp sternal edges has been successfully tested on pigs. In the present article, we demonstrate increased safety in NPWT through the use of the HeartShield device.', 'Six patients were treated with a specially designed device in combination with NPWT. The device consists of a horizontally placed disk covered in foam. The back of the T-shaped device sticks up between the sternal edges and up above skin level. This part of the device is also covered in foam. Drainage is performed through two holes at the top of the device. The device and foam are changed every second to third day, and -120 mm Hg of continuous therapy is used. Six patients were treated with traditional NPWT, serving as control group.', 'No signs of calluslike formation were seen on the right ventricle in the group treated with the HeartShield device. In the conventional NPWT control group, all six patients had calluslike formation (>1 × 2 cm2) on the anterior part of the right ventricle. All patients in the HeartShield group had grade 1 epicardial petechial bleeding (<0.5 cm2) on the right ventricle. In the control group, one patient had grade 1 (<0.5 cm2), three patients had grade 2 (0.5-2.0 cm2), and two patients had grade 3 (>2.0 cm2) epicardial petechial bleeding on the right ventricle. No major bleeding or mortality was observed in either group during the course of the study.\Question: Does the HeartShield device reduce the risk for right ventricular damage in patients with deep sternal wound infection?

Output: The use of the HeartShield device significantly minimizes the contact between the right ventricle and the sternal edges, thereby decreasing the risk for life-threatening complications due to bleeding.


Input: Consider Input: Context: The aim of this study was to investigate whether risk factors for embolism would promote thrombus formation in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF).', 'Hemostatic markers for platelet activity (ie, platelet factor-4 and beta-thromboglobulin [TG]), thrombotic status (ie, prothombin fragments 1 and 2), and fibrinolytic status (ie, d-dimer) were determined in 246 patients with NVAF (mean age, 66.1 years) and 111 control subjects without NVAF (68.3 years).', 'The beta-TG level was higher in NVAF patients than in control subjects. D-dimer levels were higher in NVAF patients having risk factors (mean [+/- SE] d-dimer level, 158.6 +/- 9.2 ng/mL) than in those without risk factors (mean d-dimer level, 92.1 +/- 6.7 ng/mL; p < 0.01) and in control subjects (mean d-dimer level: control subjects with risk factors, 79.1 +/- 10.3 ng/mL; control subjects without risk factors, 31.0 +/- 7.4 ng/mL; p < 0.01). NVAF (odds ratio [OR], 3.94; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.87 to 8.30; p = 0.0003) and age of >/= 75 years (OR, 5.68; 95% CI, 2.87 to 11.23; p < 0.0001) emerged as predictors of elevated levels of d-dimer, and only NVAF (OR, 10.30; 95% CI, 5.67 to 18.72; p < 0.0001) emerged as a predictor of elevated levels of beta-TG.\Question: Is prothrombotic activity increased in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation and risk factors for embolism?


Output: NVAF patients whose conditions were complicated with risk factors for embolism could be in the prothrombotic state. Advanced age is a strong predictor of the prothrombotic state in NVAF patients.