In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine the neutral choice based on your inference from the statement and your commonsense knowledge. The neutral choice is a sentence that neither agrees nor disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3', corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence. If sentence X agrees with sentence Y, one's correctness follows from the other one. If sentence X disagrees with sentence Y, they can not be correct at the same time.

Example Input: Statement: Moreover, requiring legal services attorneys to monitor their clients' movements and formally withdraw whenever the client left the country would creating extraordinary burdens for the LSC grantees, the clients, opposing parties, and the courts. Choices: 1. There would be huge burdens upon LSC grantees if attorneys had to monitor their clients.  2. There is no burnen in attorneys monitoring their clients.  3. The LSC lawyers are extremely overworked. 
Example Output: 3

Example Input: Statement: Why not just abolish all the laws that are supposed to protect These folk; because if you do not have legal services, the laws are unenforceable and useless. Choices: 1. These folk need legal services to protect them. 2. There is no way to enforce the laws with no legal services. 3. The people can protect themselves against the law.
Example Output: 1

Example Input: Statement: oh boy bet that got warm Choices: 1. I bet it was freezing. 2. I bet it heated up a lot. 3. I bet the beach got warm.
Example Output:
3