We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Ex Input:
Sent1: Most other first-world countries don't have the death penalty, but have lower rates of crime, just pointing that out.
 Sent2: In the United States, states without the death penalty has consistently lower murder rates.

Ex Output:
Similar


Ex Input:
Sent1: I'm not saying that a child's life is worth more than an adults, I'm saying if they killed any one they forfeit their life, because they in return lose what they took from someone else.
 Sent2: Like I said, if the person isn't convicted, then they will not be murdered in the electric chair, or by lethal injection.

Ex Output:
Not similar


Ex Input:
Sent1: I think the death penalty should only be used when there is undeniable proof against the suspect.
 Sent2: That's true, but I think the natural response to that would be that knowing the death penalty might be applied jurors would be much more careful about the burden of proof.

Ex Output:

Not similar