Given a document, find the main entity about whom the author is writing. Write the full name if mentioned in the text. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].
--------
Question: ''If  Orrin Hatch  came in third place in the Iowa caucuses  that would be bigger news that George Bush winning '' said James Camp  Mr. Hatch's national political director. ''The headlines would not be that Bush wins  but that  Hatch  takes third.''
 Even Mr. Hatch  said  his  goal was to ''do fourth or better.''
To that end  the Hatch campaign is heavily depending on local newspaper interviews and small-town radio call-in and television talk shows to spread  his  word  since there is no cost.
Speaking  talk-show style  on the same level as the audience rather than from the stage  Mr. Hatch attacked his opponents. ''How many of those people have the experience  yes  the knowledge and the ability to work with Congress and really fulfill all those campaign promises?'' Mr. Hatch asked. ''I understand Congress to the last person. I passed 43 bills in the last Congress. Sure  I can't get everything passed  but  Orrin Hatch  will die trying.''
 He  also said the Democrats in the race  Vice President Al Gore and former Senator Bill Bradley  were ''far left  and you better understand that.''
It was difficult to tell if  Mr. Hatch  won any converts. Jack Croft said that while he liked what  Mr. Hatch  said on ''our need for more military readiness ''  he  was not swayed enough to vote for  him .
David Holzinger  who said  he  was trying to decide between  Mr. Hatch  and Mr. Forbes  said: ''I came because  he 's a giant in the Senate. I like what  he  said on the ethics of the Clinton administration.''

Answer: Orrin Hatch


Question: The Pretenders surge through their 1981 track "Talk of the Town" in a preview of their upcoming Austin City Limits episode  which premieres Saturday  October 14th.  Chrissie Hynde and James Walbourne  form a wall of rippling guitar chords on the dreamy Pretenders II track.
In another exclusive clip of  their  debut ACL appearance  the quintet perform "I Hate Myself" from their Dan Auerbach-produced 2016 LP  Alone. Over a static drum beat  moaning pedal-steel and woozy tremolo bar drone   Hynde  berates  herself  by sneering the song title over and over.
Related The Pretenders Ain't Sobbing  Chrissie Hynde  on  her  early days as a music critic  being a woman on the road  and almost losing  her  virginity to  Ron Wood
 Hynde  also praised Auerbach for his production and laid-back spirit during the recording of Alone. "I see it as a Dan Auerbach album "  she  admitted. "In my heart of hearts  that's how I see that album. It's more like I guested with him. But of course I'm very happy to take the credit. He's the producer  and that's just the way it has to be."

Answer: Chrissie Hynde


Question: Laura Ingraham  was one of the few people who saw Donald Trumpâs shocking victory coming. More importantly  as a former speechwriter for Ronald Reagan who saw firsthand how viciously the Bush-aligned establishment despised Reaganâs working-class voters   Ingraham  understands how powerful the conservative-populist movement is and why the elites in the permanent political class have spent gazillions and worked overtime for three decades to thwart it.
In  her  blockbuster new book  Billionaire at the Barricades: The Populist Revolution from Reagan to Trump  Ingraham  the best-selling author  explains how Trump got elected and the forces heâand other economic nationalistsâwill have to battle to implement the peopleâs agenda.
Billionaire at the Barricades is a must-read because  Ingraham   who still gets chills when she sees footage of the crowd at Kemper Arena in 1976 realizing they had nominated the wrong man in Gerald Ford  takes readers on a fast-paced journey through the 2016 campaign cycle and shows how everyone who was blindsided by Trumpâs rise should have seen it coming  especially after Dave Bratâs shocking primary victory over then-House Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-VA) in 2014.
Elites give off the impression that Trumpâs populism on the campaign trail was something they had never seen before when  in fact  every candidate who has won the presidency in the television age has been the one who was the most populist. As  Ingraham  writes  âpresidential candidates invoke the populist style because it connects with working people.â
Conservatism and populism  according to  Ingraham   âoverlap in their opposition to âbig thingsââbig government  big international organizations  big media  big business cronyism.â
Reagan understood that âthese distant  uncaring entities rob people of decision making and ignore their interests â and  Ingraham  notes that âPat Buchanan and Donald Trump summarized conservative populism best when each vowed to put âAmerica first.ââ
âConservative populists tend to support a policy of economic nationalismâpeople-centered economic policies that put the nation and its workers first. They oppose a massive national debt because it weakens America and makes its citizens beholden to lenders â  she  continues. âThey also believe high taxes are bad because they sap workersâ wages and economic freedom. Similarly  they are against huge trade deals and international organizations like the World Trade Organization because they take power out of the hands of voters and give it to a far-away and often hostile global elite.â
When it comes to foreign policy   Ingraham  explains that âconservative populists oppose broad military interventionism and believe military force should only be used when American interests are threatened.â  She  slams populismâs critics who foolishly toss around âthe term âisolationismâ to dismiss populist foreign policy â even though that label does not describe any populist  she  has ever known.
 Ingraham  points out that âthroughout the Cold War  populists were among the strongest voices opposing Soviet communism.â In addition  populists have always believed that âsquandering the nationâs wealth and blood on un-winnable wars and nation-building is unwise. Instead  they support a pragmatic foreign policy based on achieving âpeace through strengthâ by maintaining a strong military and using it prudently.â
Unfortunately  as  Ingraham  details  âsome conservatives took a dangerous detourâ and âthrust us into a bizarre world of globalization  wars based on idealism and nation-building  and intense hatred toward the very voters who accounted for the Reagan coalition in the first place.â
The betrayal started almost immediately after George H.W. Bush won Reaganâs third term. The Bush administration purged Reaganites  and  Ingraham  recalls that Margaret Tutwiler told Reaganite Ed Rollins at a party that âthere are a lot of us who had to suffer during the eight years of Reagan  and now itâs our turn.â
âWe were Reagan people. They were Bush people. We all knew what the differences were â  Ingraham  writes. âMany of the GOP Establishment types who behind closed doors scoffed at Reagan as a dim-witted former actor with anââultraconservativeâ outlook were now working in the Bush administration. They thought it was time to return the Republican Party to what they believed was its more genteel  respectable roots. In effect  it meant the return to power of the Rockefeller Republicans who had worked to deny Reagan the presidency in 1976.â
Bushâs Office of Management and Budget Director Richard Darman convinced Bush to infamously abandon his âread my lipsâ pledge not to raise taxes  and  in the end   Ingraham  argues that âGeorge H. W. Bush stalled the conservative-populist engine that powered Reaganism.â As Rollins said  âGeorge Bush was the beneficiary of the greatest baton pass in presidential history in 1988  and he and his people tossed it away.â
âGlobalism is fundamentally anti-American because it aims to raze American sovereignty by atrophying our ability to take independent actions that are in our nationâs best interests â  Ingraham  writes  pointing out that globalists do not understand that âbecause of the enormous anti-American sentiment around the world  itâs almost impossible to create a multinational organization where U.S. interests donât become compromised or harmed.â
Just like his father  George W. Bush campaigned as a populist but governed as a globalist.  Ingraham  blames âBushâs decision to aggressively pursue amnesty after his unpopular warâ for insulting the âmillions of conservative-populists who had worked so hard to put him in power.â
âBecause of Bush  conservatives lost everything â  she  continues. âWe lost the House. We lost the Senate. And we lost the White House.â

Answer:
Laura Ingraham