Categorize the comment on the basis of toxicity. If the comment is toxic (harmful, malicious, derogatory, threat, insult, identity attck, etc.) output Yes, otherwise output No.
--------
Question: It was more than that Paul.  Vinis repeatedly attacked Clark's record.   And he did not offer any vigorous defense.   Nor did he go on the offensive and attack any of the numerous vulnerabilities that Vinis had.   Apparently he thought he could win this election being a gentleman, and refraining from criticizing Vinis.

However, elections don't work that way.   Attack campaigns do work!   That is why politicians use them so much.

Answer: No


Question: This article is actually fairly balanced for a New York Times article.  Maybe they realize that they are the source of incitement for violence against democracy.  Almost every article they have written on Trump includes gratuitous references to racism, fascism, misognyism, ism ism ism ism etc etc etc.  And now they try to blame it on social media?

Answer: No


Question: Great manipulation of my words.  Maybe we should have all the idiots come to you for guidance and counseling.  That would make the world a better place.

Answer:
Yes