Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.

[EX Q]: The city is ANTI-car, period.  They would rather create a hindrance to traffic, in an attempt to force people to ride transit, etc.

The Hub housing project will accommodate over 500 residence (I believe it is 514), yet it only has 100 onsite parking spaces.  There is an "overflow" parking lot, but its a quarter mile east of the Hub.
[EX A]: No

[EX Q]: I agree. There's no way to dismiss the predatory nature of an adult - any adult - having sex with a minor. In this case she was 43, he 17?? No excuse.
[EX A]: Yes

[EX Q]: my friend, you have lost all credibility on this issue.  the posts are singularly pointing out the same thing.  does that not tell you that maybe it's you and not the other posters?  perhaps some self education or  a men's group discussing the issue...an anthropology class and how the awareness of what is inappropriate and the after effects of being victimized, including male victims?  I would not want to believe that you are the stereotypical woman hater.  resentful, empathic and ignorant, again in defined sense of the word - no name calling.  please , just spend some time looking into the current information known about this transgression and violation of another.
[EX A]:
Yes