In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Q: Comment: Don't cry "reverse racism" or make false equivalencies. Context matters. Saying whiteface is the same as blackface trivializes historical oppression (hello, black folks were not the slave owners/lynchers/Jim Crow enforcers). People of color are forced to assimilate themselves to the mainstream white culture in order to survive; putting on a "white face" is something we must do every day.  When a white person dons black face, they are trying on the face of the marginalized other for fun without living or experiencing racism. Not to mention the historical context of blackface. Google it.

A: Non-obscene
****
Q: Comment: Great point! That darn Obama, he granted amnesty to 3,000,000 illegal immigrants, banned assault weapons and secretly funded Iran against the law of the land! Oh wait, my mistake, that was Reagan.

A: Obscene
****
Q: Comment: "they can be just as bad as the Nazis can be, if not worse"
.
Your rationalization amounts to an enablement of their goals which,
I assure, are much more heinous than those of those who oppose them.
.
If you want to continue to enable them then that's your choice.
I will not join you by opting for #2.

A:
Non-obscene
****