Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
--------
Question: I've already spoken to the "attack," but I cannot heal you (this is Eugene).
I regret causing you such obvious anguish and anger. Your initial response to my post, a good example of ad hominem, ignited it.

Answer: No


Question: I've read state OCS yearly statistical reports, Kirk, and those statistics just don't support your so-called legal opinion that children are being abused.  Neglect perhaps, but abuse no.  I'd like to know if in any of your child welfare cases how many of your child clients were removed from their homes solely based on the fact of overcrowding minus abuse or neglect.  How many of your child clients did you bother to reunify with their families or did you even care about reunification?  Your legal job is to reunify not divide families.  And yes I agree, there's a lot of money to be made off the heads of children, especially in the legal profession like yours.

Answer: No


Question: Anchorage would be a ghost town if not propped up by tax money - state money and especially federal money.  The people who lecture and pontificate about rural Alaska's dependence on public money  are clueless hypocrites.   And racist too!  Most of Alaska's wealth - spiritual, cultural, economic comes out of rural Alaska.  The whole world knows this. Read a book.

Answer:
Yes