TASK DEFINITION: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.
PROBLEM: Comment: Yes a PM who was put in place by the establishment, the same establishment that gave us Kathleen!!!!

Truly its only been a year and what do we see: Allllll key campaign promises broken, sky rocketing energy cost, expensive weak immigration policy's, soaring housing cost, out of control debt, zero foreign policy's, conflict of interest charges  and multiple lavish vacations in one year!!!!

Yes Canada is back

IF f i voted for change I would be sick to my stomach.

 SIMPLY PUT, GOVERNMENT WON THE ELECTRON AND TAX PAYERS LOST!!!!!!!!

SOLUTION: Non-obscene

PROBLEM: Comment: The authors of the  JJ report insist that homosexuality played no role in the abuse crisis, but their own data undermine this conclusion. For example, they plainly admit that “81% of the victims [between 1950 and 2002] were male,” and that 78% were post-pubescent.

So if the abusers weren’t pedophiles, and the victims were mostly adolescent males, wouldn’t that make the victimizers homosexuals?

What else could we possibly be talking about if not homosexuality?

Why can't you answer this question?

SOLUTION: Non-obscene

PROBLEM: Comment: The reply from the right is that criminals and mentally ill will get guns anyway. So why not do away with speed limits? People will speed anyway. shoplifting should be legal--people will steal anyway. Why not legalize murder--people will kill anyway.

SOLUTION:
Non-obscene