In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.

[EX Q]: Comment: We knew Bryant as a young man and enjoyed him and his outlook on life.  It hurts to know he is gone and we will always miss him and what could have been.  Be kind to his memory, he was a friend, son, brother and member of our community.  RIP
[EX A]: Agree

[EX Q]: Comment: We're not in denial. Telling a woman what not to wear is just as much as a micro-aggression as forcing a woman to wear something she doesn't want to. We hate the niqab and burqa too but realise that they will not disappear with a ban. The only thing Europe has succeeded in doing with their bans is to further ghettoise and isolate the Muslim communities, which makes it easier for radicalisation. Things change by having subsequent generations integrate more into mainstream and secular society, something that Canada does fairly well. It's slow (a matter of generations) but effective, particularly since we do not have nowhere near the same level of influx Europe has.
[EX A]: Disagree

[EX Q]: Comment: Stephane Dion
Michael Ignatieff
Justin Trudeau

not exactly better than O'Leary
[EX A]:
Disagree