In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: threat and non-threat. Threat is a statement that someone will be hurt or harmed, especially if the person does not do something in particular.

[Q]: Comment: The only shame in the execution of Saddam is that we couldn't hang him more than once. Good riddance.
[A]: Threat


[Q]: Comment: So, the much vaunted TRUMPCARE has now become the DUMPCARE.

That's one for Obama :)
[A]: Non-threat


[Q]: Comment: Yes, they were publicising their disagreement with the teaching of the Catholic Church. How were the police to know what they would do next?
The world's media would have put any disruption of a Papal Mass on the front page; you know that as well as I do, you know the value of publicity and their sole aim was to gain publicity? 
You agree with them, with their aims and would perhaps approve of such a demonstration, that is your right. It is also the right of the Roman Police and the Vatican Gendarmerie to nip such a demonstration in the bud. That is the issue here, not whether 'ordaining' women is right or wrong.
[A]:
Non-threat