Categorize the comment on the basis of severe toxicity. If the comment is severely toxic output Yes, otherwise output No.

Bazinga!   ;-)
No

This is what small government looks like. To be clear, a lot of other Valley neighborhoods are used as drunken playgrounds for idiots. It's really just about attracting and pandering to discourteous people, people who litter and race their ATVs and dirt bikes on residential roads. 

Reminds me of the sleazy Anchorageites who successfully lobbied the Assembly to let them throw their drunken parties and take over a small residential lake every weekend, making the actual residents miserable. Those Anchorageites were insufferably self righteous about their entitlement to trash a Valley neighborhood on the weekends with their equally sleazy friends. 

The Assembly took the side of the weekenders over the actual residents. 

Yahoo MatSu, right?
Yes

I don't completely disagree except all it took was a "well...I didn't really want to." as an afterthought, when at the time there was VERY MUCH consent.  The "gain" that you speak of is peace of mind for the person, or justification that their "actions" don't garner them a label (slut, whore, whatever) after the fact.  As I mentioned I witnessed someone try to "change the story" after the fact because the relationship they wanted turned into just a one-night stand (well a few-nights stand).  

This may not be the case, but I can certainly see this scenario playing out.  And to be clear I am NOT saying it doesn't happen, I've witnessed the "sports parties" on campus.  I can assure you many despicable actions get swept under the rug by the University administration concerning their athletes.  I'm just saying "1 in 9" seems pretty high.

Yes