We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Ex Input:
Sent1: I think what is also important is that nobody to my knowledge is saying that a law abiding citizen shouldn't have the right to own a gun.
 Sent2: As said,I think the people of the USA are quite capable of deciding about their own gun laws without a Brit getting involved but to make guns freely available to British citizens would be a bad, bad idea.

Ex Output:
Not similar


Ex Input:
Sent1: The 2nd Amendment is not there to entitle you to all of the gun control you want!
 Sent2: Which would be worthless because you could just repeal that amendment and then repeal the 2nd.

Ex Output:
Not similar


Ex Input:
Sent1: If anything, it has ruled in favor of gun control, saying in the Miller case that "The Second Amendment must be interpreted and applied with a view to its purpose of rendering effective the Militia."
 Sent2: In other words the Miller case interpreted the Second Amendment to mean one has the right to own militia type weapons.

Ex Output:

Similar