In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

[EX Q]: Comment: That's OK.  Trudeau will just target campaigning towards young first time 2019 voters and his avo toast followers, who are largely oblivious to recent Liberal tax grabs, spending problems and general hypocrisy.  This won't end well.
[EX A]: Non-identity-attack

[EX Q]: Comment: Quote: "Michelle Obama is taking some heat for recent remarks she made on gender, but I'm struggling to muster outrage given the sheer incoherence of what she actually said."

True, I've rarely found what Michelle says coherent, but I suspect that what she's saying is primarily directed at black communities. She could have gone much further and bluntly stated that blacks coddle far too much the criminality and paternal irresponsibility in black males. (I won't call them men.) That's glaringly obvious and different from mostly white schools where ordinary boyishness is attacked as "toxic masculinity."
[EX A]: Identity-attack

[EX Q]: Comment: Spoken like someone who hasn't been watching the live streams. Lol Siemian had 3 dropped INTs a few days ago; Lynch threw one.  
So pointing out someone's bias means they have one of their own...? News to me, but so by basic logic, you're now pointing out yours.  Hm.  Lol
Your last line is asinine. I'm hearing from you "You can't say he's in a shitty situation because Trevor is also in a shitty situation." I already said they both are and they're both set up for failure.  
You guys misread it. I like Trevor and I like Paxton. I appreciate that you can understand Lynch still can develop. I just have to defend Paxton from all of these idiots who don't understand what development takes. He certainly hasn't exceeded expectation. But these people who think Trevor is head and shoulders above Paxton are delusional.  Where Lynch might throw an incompletion on a 3rd and 9, Siemian throws a check-down for three yards. And no, it doesn't "give the receiver" a chance.  We saw that last year.
[EX A]:
Non-identity-attack