In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: insult and non-insult. Insult is any lanugage or act that is disrespectful or scornfully abusive.

Comment: If it was against the law then why did they "let him off" with a warning about being inappropriate and not wrong ? I don't advocate taking these kinds of pictures and don't do it myself, but nobody here, including Motley Fool has made a case that the guy broke the law. And in my, psychologically damaged, mind he may have acted rudely and cruely, but did not break the law. And, again, if the woman is so bothered by people looking at or taking pictures of he bare flesh then she can cover it up. AND she didn't seem to have an issue with it until she was denied a promotion, unless I am reading the story incorrectly.
Non-insult

Comment: Gary:  Several times in the past (years ago) I have attempted to have a reasonable discussion with a conservative Christian.  There is no way ever to win, compromise, or even to have a truce based on 'can we agree to disagree'.  They always know who is going to heaven (those who live the Bible word-for-word and call themselves Christian) and everyone else who is going south.  My family contains beliefs on both ends, which led to a total ban of religious discussion at any gathering.  Like other humble thinkers, I feel my strong spiritual belief is my own business, between me and my creator.  Just keeping myself humble and contemplative is a full-time occupation, let alone judging someone else's piety.  Why do some here have such a chip on their shoulder about religion?  Perhaps their beliefs are not quite firm enough for confidence, and they must constantly defend themselves for fear they might begin to doubt.
Non-insult

Comment: The drugs are taken to escape the reality of the cesspool that we live in. Nothing will change that.

Non-insult