We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

[Q]: Sent1: The death penalty executes felons found guilty of especially heinous crimes.
 Sent2: Murder is murder and those who execute the death penalty are murderers as well.
[A]: Not similar


[Q]: Sent1: So should we be able to impose the sentence of life without parole, all the while understanding that we may have put an innocent man in prison for life?
 Sent2: Back to reality, we convict the wrong person all the time, and we've set up a system where death penalty is actually more expensive than life in prison.
[A]: Not similar


[Q]: Sent1: Both the death penalty and a life sentence would have prevent further murders.
 Sent2: (If a murderer is released and murders again, that has nothing to do with the death penalty, rather the sentencing laws, so doesn't contribute to the number of lives saved by the death penalty).
[A]:
Not similar