Categorize the comment on the basis of severe toxicity. If the comment is severely toxic output Yes, otherwise output No.

[Q]: Now, now... As the proponent of your incorrect glass-house assertions, which are incongruent with the facts, don't be throwing any stones about dumb assumptions.
[A]: Yes


[Q]: You reveal your ignorance once again. I am reminded of an Alaska Republican house member who used to sponsor a death penalty bill every session. I thought he was generally a pretty good rep. His son wound up starving his grandson to death. Jerry's response was that his daughter-in-law should have been held solely responsible for that awful tragedy. The next year, he again sponsored the bill.
[A]: Yes


[Q]: here's something i have already learned...idiot savants like ben carson may have advanced degrees and be able to write books, but when they start spouting off about their invisible friend in the sky, they reveal themselves as utterly delusional and, if not certifiably insane, certainly borderline insane.
      
that includes you, minnery, with your 'just like billy graham' howler of a revelation.  
(there is something seriously creepy here, but that's another story).
  
look, drop the pretenses.  

this is a political con gussied up in the rags of dominionist theology.
  
the people who drop $35 - $100 in the coffers either don't know that or they are pretending that they don't know in order to have these hucksters advance their political views.

how does any of this con job comfort the truly afflicted and the downtrodden?

and yes, i do know that ben carson and ben chavis are different people.

dollars to doughnuts plenty of the attendees don't know that.
[A]:
Yes