In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

Sentence: The sun was covered by a thick cloud all morning, but luckily, by the time the picnic started, it was out.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the sun because The sun comes out from behind a cloud not visa versa. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Correct

Sentence: Beth didn't get angry with Sally, who had cut her off, because she stopped and counted to ten.
 Reason: The 'she' refers to beth because Beth counted to ten because she had a reason to bey angry. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Correct

Sentence: Sam pulled up a chair to the piano, but it was broken, so he had to sing instead.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the piano because it is not a small piece of furniture, but to the person who is playing it, as in. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

Wrong