In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: threat and non-threat. Threat is a statement that someone will be hurt or harmed, especially if the person does not do something in particular.

Q: Comment: If a dude is actively threatening to kill someone, a head shot with a scoped .308 or .223 may be reasonable.  The same is not true of a dude sitting alone in his house.  In the latter case, there is no active threat.  We people instruct police to kill the dude anyway just to prove that they must do what we want when we want it.  Okay, if that is the kind of society we want, so be it.  Recall, that we really know nothing about what the dude did, but I guess the point is that we should kill him to teach others to do what police officers tell them regardless of the circumstance.  Okay, whatever.  We craft the society in our image and reap the benefit when citizens kill because we have taught them how little value life has.

A: Threat
****
Q: Comment: Its not the Tar Heels anymore.  They are now known as Roy And The Cheaters.  If and when the NCAA comes down on them they might be in Federal Witness Program.  A shamed and failed University.  Go Blue Devils.

A: Non-threat
****
Q: Comment: When asked about his quote/ tweet,  the PM sounded very similar to Porky Pig when it came to his explanation.  

Odd that two or three days later he is crashing a wedding photo shot in his kayak.  Seems like a rather staged wag the dog scenario.

A:
Non-threat
****