In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

[Q]: Sentence: Joe has sold his house and bought a new one a few miles away. He will be moving out of it on Thursday.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the old house because it will be sold and there will be no one living there. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
[A]: Correct


[Q]: Sentence: Dr. Adams informed Kate that she had retired and presented several options for future treatment.
 Reason: The 'she' refers to dr. adams because he is the one who has been treating her with the medications and has been doing so for some time. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
[A]: Correct


[Q]: Sentence: Dan took the rear seat while Bill claimed the front because his "Dibs!" was slow.
 Reason: The 'his' refers to dan because the front would go to the person who called dibs. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
[A]:
Correct