We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

[EX Q]: Sent1: The fact remains that life in prison is cheaper than sentencing one to the death penalty.
 Sent2: Without the trials and appeals, death penalty cases would be much cheaper than confining inmates for the rest of their lives.
[EX A]: Not similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: If we execute death penalty, we will not be better than murderers.
 Sent2: Murder is murder and those who execute the death penalty are murderers as well.
[EX A]: Similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: How do you compare killing a little child who has never had the chance to live to the execution of a criminal who has been raping and killing little children?
 Sent2: One of the many grievances I have is that child rapists don't qualify for the death penalty unless the child that gets raped is also killed.
[EX A]:
Not similar