Categorize the comment on the basis of obscenity. If the comment is obscene output Yes, otherwise output No.

[EX Q]: Agreed.  If you look outside of the giant investor-bought buildings where they kick everyone out to make more money to satisfy large monied interests, almost all other "no-cause" evictions from smaller and independent landlords will have some good reason behind them, whether it is a problematic tenant (as described in one of the other stories from this article), family moving into the unit, wanting to renovate the property, etc.

If a tenant is a good tenant, that's worth a hell of a lot more than a small rent increase to keep them around.  If the tenant is paying only 50% or 60% of the market rent, well, do we ask any other business or property owner to consistently provide their goods and services at a 40-50% discount for all time?  No.
[EX A]: No

[EX Q]: I am disabled, and need to ride my bike to treat my degenerative joint disease. I have had to stop riding my bike in certain areas of Eugene not because of the heavy traffic on Coburg road, but because of all the vagrant dead end dead beat leeches passed out on the bike path, and all their grocery carts full of crap creating a hazard.
[EX A]: Yes

[EX Q]: I prefer the direct approach. When asked for money I state: "I do not support social parasites," and leave it at that.
[EX A]:
Yes