The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the self-need strategy, otherwise output No. self-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to create a personal need for an item in the negotiation, such as by pointing out that the participant sweats a lot to show preference towards water packages.

Q: Context: 'I really need some food, but I could also use extra firewood. It is supposed to be pretty cold at night and we would love to cook up some smores.' 'I hear you we have the same issues well you can have either 2 food or 2 firewood what would you prefer?' 'I would prefer 2 food. I could give you 1 food, 2 firewood and 2 water?'
Utterance: 'that sounds like a good deal to me, '

A: No
****
Q: Context: 'Your needs are like mine. I have a condition that require  me to shower quite often. It is a shame but if I do not shower for 3 hours I will stink.  ' 'Well fortunately if you are camping that won't be too bad. You'll blend in with the wilderness.' 'My friends will run away. I will not be comfortable either. So how do we split what we have?'
Utterance: 'If they're true friends, they won't. I'll take 2 firewood, 2 water, 3 food.'

A: No
****
Q: Context: 'Hello. I am so looking forward to this camp out. My daughter just called and said she is going to come and bring some of her firiends. 🙂'
Utterance: 'Hello! That sounds pretty reasonable to me. I was going out with a bunch of my buddies. We like to hike a lot in the sun, so we need lots of water. How does it sound if i take all the food and water, but you get all the firewood?'

A:
Yes
****