Given a document, an entity and its sentiment towards the entity, verify if it is the correct sentiment towards the entity. Answer should be yes or no. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

Q: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Hillary Clinton is Negative . The trend to this point gives a distinct edge to the Democrats. While roughly the same number of lawmakers in both parties are leaving their seats to run for higher office  just nine House Democrats are retiring outright or have already resigned  compared with 24 Republicans. (House members running for other offices often count as retirements  because itâs usually impractical or illegal to run for multiple positions at the same time.) Including those members who are leaving to run for another office  there will be 17 open House seats vacated by Democrats and 35 for Republicans. Democratic victories last November in gubernatorial and state legislative races in Virginia and New Jersey could spur more retirements among Republicans worried about the national political environment under Trump. And although Democrats must defend far more Senate seats than Republicans in 2018âincluding several in states that Donald Trump wonâall of the partyâs incumbents are currently running for reelection. The retirements of Corker and Flake  along with a Democratic victory in Decemberâs special election in Alabama  give Democrats an outside chance at retaking the Senate majority. In the House  theyâll need to pick up 24 seats  and the more Republicans retire in districts that  Hillary Clinton  carried last year  the more the GOP majority is at risk. Data sources: Each districtâs presidential-election results are from the Daily Kos. House and Senate election results are from the Associated Press.
2012 Senate election: +3.9 Flake He decided to leave after a single term rather than wage what would have been a brutal fight for reelection  first in a primary against a hard-right Trump backer  Kelli Ward  and then  if he won  against a centrist Democrat  Representative Kyrsten Sinema  in the general election. Flake had lost his base in Arizona: His criticism of Trump in his recent book  Conscience of a Conservative  alienated the presidentâs GOP backers  while his conservative voting record put off Democrats. Orrin Hatch  Utah 2016 presidential election: +17.9 Trump over Hillary Clinton; +23.8 Trump over Evan McMullin
2014 Senate election: +10.24 Franken Under pressure from fellow Democrats  Franken announced in December he would resign âin the coming weeksâ after multiple women came forward to accuse him of inappropriate sexual behavior. Most of the allegations involved Franken groping women while taking a photo. His resignation means there will be a special Senate election in 2018 in a state that Hillary Clinton barely carried in 2016. House Republicans Retiring Outright Steve Helber / AP Bob Goodlatte  Virginia 6th district 2016 presidential election: +24.8 Trump
2016 House election: +0.52 Issa Issa in January became one of the most recognizable House Republicans to announce his retirement. A former chairman of the Oversight and Government Reform Committee  he served as the chief congressional inquisitor of the Obama administration for several years. Issa is annually ranked as one of the wealthiest members of Congress  having co-founded the company behind the Viper car alarm (for which he famously provided the voice). But he was in for the fight of his life to win reelection after nearly losing in 2016 in a district that  Hillary Clinton  carried over Donald Trump.

A: no
****
Q: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Donald J. Trump is Positive . Trump . (AP /Carolyn Kaster)
So much for the metaphysics of dynamic growth.  The Trump team  late last year argued the tax package would unleash so much economic activity that the Treasury wouldn’t notice a permanent  40 percent reduction in the corporate rate (the real reduction turned out to be 14 percent). The contention didn't survive the winter.
— Plan shifts burden to state and private money. NYT's Patricia Cohen and Alan Rappeport: " Trump ’s $200 billion plan to rebuild America upends the criteria that have long been used to pick ambitious federal projects  putting little emphasis on how much an infrastructure proposal benefits the public and more on finding private investors and other outside sources of money. Unveiled on Monday  the infrastructure program that  Mr. Trump  has championed since the campaign is intended to attract a huge amount of additional money from states  localities and private investors. The goal is to generate a total pot of $1.5 trillion to upgrade the country’s highways  airports and railroads. Those financial priorities are crystallized in the new guidelines established by the White House. The ability to find sources of funding outside the federal government will be the most important yardstick  accounting for 70 percent of the formula for choosing infrastructure projects. How “the project will spur economic and social returns on investment” ranks at the bottom  at just 5 percent."
Dems say  Trump  wants to cuts more than  he  spends. The Post's John Wagner: "Besides unveiling  his  infrastructure plan   Trump  also released  his  2019 budget blueprint Monday. Combing through it  the office of Senate Minority Leader Charles E. Schumer (D-N.Y.) identified more than $240 billion in proposed cuts over the coming decade to an array of existing infrastructure programs — a higher number than what  Trump  is proposing in 'new' spending."
 Trump  weighed in this morning:
Our infrastructure plan has been put forward and has received great reviews by everyone except  of course  the Democrats. After many years we have taken care of our Military  now we have to fix our roads  bridges  tunnels  airports and more. Bipartisan  make deal Dems? — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) February 13  2018
(The SEC and CFTC requests earned a rare nod of approval for the  Trump  administration from the watchdog group Better Markets  which called them "an important recognition that the cops on the Wall Street beat don’t have the funding they need to do their jobs protecting the American people.")
— Spending plans. Politico's Sarah Ferris: "Alongside its original budget request  the  Trump  administration Monday also released the details of what it would recommend doing with the extra money for domestic programs included in Congress' spending deal enacted last week. That includes an increase to the State Department  which the administration’s original document proposed to slash by 30 percent this coming fiscal year. The extra cash would go into the budget for the United Nations  humanitarian aid and global AIDS programs. Each of those efforts would have been cut under  Trump ’s original plan."
The Department of Rosy Scenario is doing a lot of work in  Trump 's budget. — Steven Dennis (@StevenTDennis) February 13  2018
— BAT redux. Politico's Doug Palmer: " Trump  on Monday said  he  wants to impose a "reciprocal tax" on imports from countries that have higher tariffs than the U.S. 'We are going to charge countries outside of our country — countries that take advantage of  the United States ' Trump  said at a White House meeting with state and local government officials about the administration's infrastructure plan...  Trump  seemed to be complaining about the U.S.' relatively low duty structure when compared with those of some other countries."
It surprised  his  aides  "who warned that no formal plans have been prepared " per WSJ's Michael Bender.
Dollar Stores Hammered by Trump Proposal to Abandon Food Stamps A  Trump  administration proposal to reduce food-stamp benefits is casting a cloud over U.S. dollar-store chains. Bloomberg
What did  Trump  propose cutting in  his  2019 budget? Check out this great graphic from the Post staff:
 President Trump  said the decline in U.S. infrastructure and increase in the deficit was caused by "laziness" after World War II:

A: yes
****
Q: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Taylor Swift is Positive . Taylor Swift  performs in Houston. (John Salangsang/Invision/AP)
In Washington  an army of UPS trucks is swarming the city plastered with signs promising a #TaylorSwiftDelivery: the pop singerâs sixth album  âReputation â out Nov. 10. Four already released tracks tease a darker tone where the âold  Taylor â is âdeadâ and a reinvention of one of the most successful artists in the world. Itâs not enough to appease feminist critics  however.
Itâs been quite a year for  Swift   who has matured in public in a way few female stars have the courage to    staging a dispute between  her  different public âselvesâ in a video for  her  song âLook What You Made Me Doâ earlier this year. Meanwhile   she  pursued a lawsuit against a former radio host whom  she  accused of groping  her  in 2013  a move heralded by the Guardian as a âuniversal feminist statementâ long before #MeToo.  Swift  has openly embraced feminism since 2014 and tweeted in support of the Womenâs March in January  so you might think  given our current focus on womenâs rights and dignity  that âReputationâ would land with a girl-power splash.
But youâd be wrong. Very wrong. In fact   Swift  is already under fire from feminist critics. And their attacks reveal something very ugly about modern feminism: While todayâs feminists claim to champion the rights of all women  they speak only for women who agree with them â vocally  frequently and on demand.
[Sorry   Taylor Swift . Being a feminist is about more than supporting your girlfriends.]
Anticipating âReputation â Bustle editor Rachel Simon insisted that the 27-year-old Swift âcanât just say that the media has painted her as a fake feminist or a manipulative liar; she needs to say âI deserved it.â â Even after her sexual assault lawsuit  feminists pounced on  Swift . Salon writer Rachel Leah retorted that  Swift  is âknown to wave the feminist banner only when it directly benefits her.â Bustle agreed  decrying  Swift âs feminism as a âdeeply flawed â âself-servingâ âwhite feminism.â
As proof of her feminist failures  editor Kadeen Griffiths listed  Swift âs many faults: not criticizing President Trump  not âpublicly support[ing] organizationsâ like Planned Parenthood and not attending the Womenâs March (her tweet apparently wasnât enough.) Outlet after outlet has pressured  Swift  to condemn the president in the name of feminism. In January  the Daily Beast went so far as to accuse her of âSpineless Feminism.â  Swift  may be the highest-paid artist in the world   but her decision to speak out on issues as she pleases rather than as others call on her to means she gets little credit for the space sheâs made for female artists.
[The ACLU slams Taylor Swift for trying to protect her reputation]
We have no idea what  Taylor Swift  thinks about any number of specific political issues: how  she  feels about Trump  what  she  thinks the goals of feminism ought to be  where  she  comes down on abortion or anything else. But the ongoing denouncement of  Swift  proves that you donât even have to have convictions as firm as antiabortion feminists to be counted out of todayâs movement. All it takes to get exiled is to not affirm the party line loudly enough. And for any movement seeking to advance the cause of women as a whole  thatâs a problem.
The test of a feministâs commitment should be how  she  treats women who are different from  her . It shouldnât matter if  Swift  agrees or disagrees  if  she  speaks or remains silent. We should applaud  her  ability as a person  independent  with  her  own heart and mind  to be who  she  wishes. The same should go for any number of women who hold different political views but agree that womenâs voices should be a part of the national conversation. Their feminism is real  their perspectives matter  and they should be welcome to contribute to a movement that promotes womenâs welfare and status. That should be feminismâs reputation.

A:
yes
****