In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Example Input: Comment: Wow, 1 emotionally charged letter from some anonymous person from Los Angeles causes a representative from Hawaii to not represent her constituents but react out of fear. We need stronger representatives here, who will actually act in our best interest. This is just sad that she would react so quickly and cowardly to such a statement.
Example Output: Non-sexual-explicit

Example Input: Comment: So whats next, a play where the black President gets lynched?
These are very sick people in NYC.
Example Output: Non-sexual-explicit

Example Input: Comment: Mr. Taylor,

Your comments and responses exhibit a lack of understanding of the beliefs of Jehovah's Witnesses.  They further exhibit a lack of effort to understand what they believe.  When one does not try to understand the other person, notwithstanding maintaining disagreement, there is no meaningful point to criticizing those views.  

You have spent considerable time and effort to disparage views that you do not want to understand.  This seems to be a pointless pursuit.   

Jehovah's Witnesses, at least those who practice this faith, believe themselves to be "honest hearted" ones as defined in the Bible.  Those who see the world to be not as they would expect it's creator to have made it. Those who are "sighing and groaning over the detestable things" they see around them, not accepting and not believing men have the power to correct the problems.  Those who do not see themselves as the center of the universe but rather believe there to be a creator worth searching for.
Example Output:
Non-sexual-explicit