In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

Input: Consider Input: Sentence: George got free tickets to the play, but he gave them to Eric, even though he was particularly eager to see it.
 Reason: The 'he' refers to george because because he was particularly eager to see it so  George got free tickets to the play, but he gave them to Eric. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

Output: Wrong


Input: Consider Input: Sentence: I put the heavy book on the table and it broke.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the table because the 'book' is made out of a wood, but it's not specified. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

Output: Wrong


Input: Consider Input: Sentence: The cat was lying by the mouse hole waiting for the mouse, but it was too impatient.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the cat because of the way it's always 'on my tail' and because the 'mouse' is an abbre. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 


Output: Wrong