In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.

[Q]: Comment: So let me get this straight. The Lord's Prayer was removed from our schools a while back. Schools are not allowed to put on a Christmas concert in December - it is now called a winter concert. However, one particular group of people, new to this country, are allowed to practice their religion within the walls of our supposedly secular school system? I don't know whether to laugh or cry.
[A]: Agree


[Q]: Comment: Furlong did lie. Let's not forget that. At first he denied being in BC during an earlier stint in Burns Lake, then he admitted it, downplaying the commission of almost 2 years of his life and his original start in Canada. While that doesn't mean he hid something, it does bring up the matter of deception and convenient forgetfulness.

That si why he has zero claim for libel or wrongful dismissal.

So let him get on with his life, but not as a trusted public speaker or figure. His showboating style (Evermet him? Lots of self-promotion in his personality) is something he paid a price for.
[A]: Disagree


[Q]: Comment: It's not surprising that the man behind the curtain, Gerald Butts, is doing to Canada what he did to Ontario....influencing a series of poor/corrupt decisions that drove the Province into the ground. For those familiar with the story, our PM is the Scarecrow. Canadians are finally starting to get it.
[A]:
Agree