Given a document, an entity and its sentiment towards the entity, verify if it is the correct sentiment towards the entity. Answer should be yes or no. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].
--------
Question: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Donald J. Trump is Positive . Trump . (AP /Carolyn Kaster)
So much for the metaphysics of dynamic growth.  The Trump team  late last year argued the tax package would unleash so much economic activity that the Treasury wouldn’t notice a permanent  40 percent reduction in the corporate rate (the real reduction turned out to be 14 percent). The contention didn't survive the winter.
— Plan shifts burden to state and private money. NYT's Patricia Cohen and Alan Rappeport: " Trump ’s $200 billion plan to rebuild America upends the criteria that have long been used to pick ambitious federal projects  putting little emphasis on how much an infrastructure proposal benefits the public and more on finding private investors and other outside sources of money. Unveiled on Monday  the infrastructure program that  Mr. Trump  has championed since the campaign is intended to attract a huge amount of additional money from states  localities and private investors. The goal is to generate a total pot of $1.5 trillion to upgrade the country’s highways  airports and railroads. Those financial priorities are crystallized in the new guidelines established by the White House. The ability to find sources of funding outside the federal government will be the most important yardstick  accounting for 70 percent of the formula for choosing infrastructure projects. How “the project will spur economic and social returns on investment” ranks at the bottom  at just 5 percent."
Dems say  Trump  wants to cuts more than  he  spends. The Post's John Wagner: "Besides unveiling  his  infrastructure plan   Trump  also released  his  2019 budget blueprint Monday. Combing through it  the office of Senate Minority Leader Charles E. Schumer (D-N.Y.) identified more than $240 billion in proposed cuts over the coming decade to an array of existing infrastructure programs — a higher number than what  Trump  is proposing in 'new' spending."
 Trump  weighed in this morning:
Our infrastructure plan has been put forward and has received great reviews by everyone except  of course  the Democrats. After many years we have taken care of our Military  now we have to fix our roads  bridges  tunnels  airports and more. Bipartisan  make deal Dems? — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) February 13  2018
(The SEC and CFTC requests earned a rare nod of approval for the  Trump  administration from the watchdog group Better Markets  which called them "an important recognition that the cops on the Wall Street beat don’t have the funding they need to do their jobs protecting the American people.")
— Spending plans. Politico's Sarah Ferris: "Alongside its original budget request  the  Trump  administration Monday also released the details of what it would recommend doing with the extra money for domestic programs included in Congress' spending deal enacted last week. That includes an increase to the State Department  which the administration’s original document proposed to slash by 30 percent this coming fiscal year. The extra cash would go into the budget for the United Nations  humanitarian aid and global AIDS programs. Each of those efforts would have been cut under  Trump ’s original plan."
The Department of Rosy Scenario is doing a lot of work in  Trump 's budget. — Steven Dennis (@StevenTDennis) February 13  2018
— BAT redux. Politico's Doug Palmer: " Trump  on Monday said  he  wants to impose a "reciprocal tax" on imports from countries that have higher tariffs than the U.S. 'We are going to charge countries outside of our country — countries that take advantage of  the United States ' Trump  said at a White House meeting with state and local government officials about the administration's infrastructure plan...  Trump  seemed to be complaining about the U.S.' relatively low duty structure when compared with those of some other countries."
It surprised  his  aides  "who warned that no formal plans have been prepared " per WSJ's Michael Bender.
Dollar Stores Hammered by Trump Proposal to Abandon Food Stamps A  Trump  administration proposal to reduce food-stamp benefits is casting a cloud over U.S. dollar-store chains. Bloomberg
What did  Trump  propose cutting in  his  2019 budget? Check out this great graphic from the Post staff:
 President Trump  said the decline in U.S. infrastructure and increase in the deficit was caused by "laziness" after World War II:

Answer: yes


Question: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Jacob Zuma is Neutral . The cartoon caused a storm when the Times published it in 2008  two years after Jacob Zuma had been acquitted of rape charges. But van der Berg said Zuma had not followed up on threats to sue until now.
 Zuma is claiming 4 million rand (about $570 000) for humiliation and degradation and 1 million rand (about $140 000) for damage to his reputation. His spokesman  Zizi Kodwa  refused to comment Tuesday.
 The cartoon also showed Zuma's political allies encouraging him as they held down a writhing  screaming figure with a sash identifying her as the "justice system."
 It appeared in the newspaper as Zuma's political party led a protest campaign to have the corruption charges dropped against him. Zuma at the time was preparing to lead his African National Congress party in general elections. Prosecutors dropped the charges on the eve of the vote  and Zuma took office in 2009.
 Buti Manamela  then a leader of the Young Communist League  filed a formal complaint about the cartoon before South Africa's Human Rights Commission in 2008. The South African Communist Party leader was among the ANC allies depicted in the cartoon.

Answer: no


Question: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Sanchez is Negative . I first wrote about disability and policing for The Nation in 2013. Iâm not sure anything has improved since then. The people who have been working on this the longest  people like the lawyer Talila Lewis and the organization HEARD and artist and activist Leroy Moore  remain unfunded  even as organizations pour money into trainings for cops. But police donât need training to choose not to shoot folks like Sanchez. They just have to stop treating noncompliance as a justification for escalation.
Back to  Sanchez   we see similar patterns of police conduct  this time with horrible  lethal  consequences. Sara NoviÄ  who identifies as Deaf and is an assistant professor of creative writing at Stockton University  told me via e-mail that the killing emerged from a âperfect storm of communication anxiety for many d/Deaf and hard-of-hearing people.â Itâs hard to talk to strangers  especially when the stakes are high. It was also dark. She notes  âEven the most skilled deaf communicators/lipreaders struggle in the dark. It is only natural that  Sanchez  would try to get closer so  he  could see what was going on  especially because  he âd had no involvement in the traffic incident they were investigating.  He  was sitting on  his  porch minding  his  own business;  he âd done nothing wrong.â But  he  didnâtâcouldnâtâcomply with orders  so a police officer killed  him .
 Instead of training police to grant people they recognize as disabled specific rights  victims like Leibel and Sanchez  demonstrate the need for police to operate with a baseline of presumption of compliance. When significant threats emerge  as does tragically happen  officers will need to respond. But when  Sanchez  walked forward  surely the officers could have stepped back. When the autistic boy was shaking his string  the officer could have just decided not to cuff a child  even if he didnât recognize the word âstimming.â There are so many ways to improve the situation without asking for specialized training.
At least four disabled people died at the hands of police this week. One previous case of unjustified police violence came to light. Except for the brief media attention of the Sanchez and Leibel cases  thatâs a pretty normal week. Itâs unlikely anyone will be held accountable  except possibly in the situation where Leibel  a white teenager in an affluent neighborhood  was brutalized. There  the combination of powerful video  a compelling victim  widespread coverage  and a good lawyer might help. In the other cases  the multiply marginalized status of the victims plus the lethality of the encounter will make accountability difficult  if not impossible. And then next week  alas  the same types of stories will play out again  and more people will die.

Answer:
yes