We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

[Q]: Sent1: The death penalty is the only just punishment for their actions.
 Sent2: The Death penalty does not work because the kind of people that murder will not stop and think of the consequences before their actions.
[A]: Not similar


[Q]: Sent1: So your argument is that if the death penalty was cheaper than life in prison it would have the advantage of being cheaper than life in prison.
 Sent2: And no one said that life in prision is "much worse" then the death penalty.
[A]: Not similar


[Q]: Sent1: This is about pro-life views and their compatibility with pro-death penalty views.
 Sent2: If convicts believe their innocence, appeals through life imprisonment is much more justifiable because it is easier to atone for a life imprisonment as opposed to death.
[A]:
Not similar