We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

Example Input: Another reason kalifornia's ban on open carry being wrong is the application of McDonald into the 14th Amendment of Civil Rights which bars States from infringing in any way on the right to keep and bear arms.
Example Output: Valid

Example Input: To make it otherwise we would need some legislation requiring Mr. Patel to accept firearms at his motel which would survive a constitutional challenge claiming that it: 1.
Example Output: Valid

Example Input: Does anyone need to tell us what our rights are when they were written to be understood by the simple man and plainly enumerated as rights belonging to the people and without which the Constitution would have never been ratified.
Example Output:
Valid