In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine the neutral choice based on your inference from the statement and your commonsense knowledge. The neutral choice is a sentence that neither agrees nor disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3', corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence. If sentence X agrees with sentence Y, one's correctness follows from the other one. If sentence X disagrees with sentence Y, they can not be correct at the same time.
--------
Question: Statement: uh i haven't had too much experience with uh judges and jurors i've uh served on a jury one time and uh i think one of my concerns after that experience was uh finding that there tend to be people in the jury that can't bring themselves to sentence someone Choices: 1. I think it's a flaw in the legal system that many would get to run free simply because people don't want to wish harm upon someone.  2. Jurors tend to be ruthless, and never let someone go without a sentence. 3. I find people asked to be Jurors tend not to want to sentence someone. 

Answer: 1


Question: Statement: The latter factor exists because postal systems need to be designed to handle a wide range of mailpieces, generated by a wide range of mailers. Choices: 1. Postal systems only need to handle one kind of mailpiece. 2. Some of the mailers using the postal system do not know what they're doing. 3. A wide range of mailers are likely to use the postal system.

Answer: 2


Question: Statement: Oh, Julius, isn't he just a duck? Choices: 1. Isn't he such a mallard?  2. Isn't he just a fish? 3. He is such an animal. 

Answer:
1