In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: threat and non-threat. Threat is a statement that someone will be hurt or harmed, especially if the person does not do something in particular.

Q: Comment: I find those who chant do so because they either have such a slim argument that they don't want to be drawn into it, or because they lack the mental prowess to mount their argument in a rational manner.  It is for that reason that the "Lock her up," chant is offensive.  

I should point out too that the main perpetrators of the chanting phenomenon are unionists, "Hey, Hey  Ho, Ho.  Fill-in-the-blank has got to go!"   Clever eh?   The "progressives" particularly the enviro-nuts, are no better,  “U.G.L.Y.  Corporate scum you cheat you lie.  You UGLY, uh, uh, you UGLY.”   That intellectual gem and many others are found on the website tarsandsblockade.org

Chanting has no place in rational debate, none.

A: Non-threat
****
Q: Comment: Please, please, please stop complaining when police officers shoot people armed with edged weapons.. Clearly Mr. Walker was badly in need of being shot and I'm disturbed that the officers were unable or unwilling to accommodate his needs.

A: Threat
****
Q: Comment: Lockstep Lisa Murkowsji voting straight down the Trump party line.  She owes her seat to Alaska Native voters and she just voted for Jeff Sessions.   How can she possibly justify voting for an avowed racist?

A:
Non-threat
****