In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: threat and non-threat. Threat is a statement that someone will be hurt or harmed, especially if the person does not do something in particular.

[Q]: Comment: Here we have a protected minority maliciously and publicly mocking another person for their religious beliefs.  Anyone else see the epic hypocrisy in that?   We all know that if the driver was a Muslim imam, JJ would NEVER say anything derogatory about him, in spite of the fact that Islam is radically misogynistic and homophobic.  Scratching my head.
[A]: Non-threat


[Q]: Comment: Confederate statues are monuments to traitors to the United States of America.  Let's not even bring up the fact they were also fighting to keep a race of people enslaved.  Any citizen can fly the Confederate flag at their house (even as dumb as that is), but there should NOT be any state or federal statues to a regime which tried to destroy the United States, and led to hundreds of thousands of people dying.
[A]: Non-threat


[Q]: Comment: It's just a stupid motion. It's not a law. Why the bickering?
[A]:
Non-threat