We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

[EX Q]: Sent1: Only .06% of people who have killed kill again when they escape, are released, etc.
 Sent2: So as long as only some innocent people are killed for crimes they didn't commit then the system must be sound.
[EX A]: Not similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: The problem with the death penalty is eventually someone will be sentenced to death when they are in fact guilty.
 Sent2: Acutally, long ago, the executioner was a convict also sentenced to death.
[EX A]: Not similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: in fact the ones against the death penalty ARE FOR ABORTION!
 Sent2: In reality I wouldn't care if the death penalty were gone.
[EX A]:
Not similar