Given a document, find the main entity about whom the author is writing. Write the full name if mentioned in the text. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

[EX Q]: In 1979   Lukasz Niec  43   was brought to the United States from Poland by  his  parents to escape an increasingly authoritarian government but now sits in a Calhoun County jail cell after three ICE officers came to  his  home last Tuesday and put  him  in handcuffs.
 He  had been spending the day off with  his  daughters.
" He  cannot go back to Poland  a country  he  doesn't know   he  has no family at " Iwona Niec-Villaire   his  sister and a corporate lawyer  told WOOD.
 Lukasz Niec  with  his  wife and two daughters (Facebook)
"Both our parents passed away in the United States.  He  doesn't know anyone   he  wouldn't know where to go."
She added  " He  doesn't even speak Polish."
 Niec  pled guilty to the charges and under the Holmes Youthful Trainee Act   he  got to avoid having a criminal record since  he  was a young  first-time offender.
"Until this gets heard  which could be up to six months   he  could be stuck in a prison cell and not helping and being with  his  family " said Niec-Villaire.
 Niec 's arrest comes as the Trump administration continues its war on illegal immigrants.
ICE hasn't commented on what caused the agency to look into  Niec 's case  but a spokesman for the ICE Detroit Field Office told MLive.com he was looking into it.
[EX A]: Lukasz Niec

[EX Q]: In a recent New York Times article  Dr. Willie Parker says he believes “that as an abortion provider  [he is] doing God’s work.” It’s his Christian faith  the author contends  that drives him to abort babies. His “Life’s Work” (as his new book is ironically titled) is to end life for every preborn child that comes before him.
The Jewish people  some of whom later became the first Christians  were to avoid partaking in the practices of the surrounding peoples  who sacrificed their children to appease their gods. Christians have long held that to abort one’s child as an act of worship to the gods of convenience is not permitted by the God of the Bible. But abortion advocates will attempt to play the “he’s a Christian” card by spinning opposition from Christians to imply  Parker  is persecuted within  his  own faith tradition.
The second thing abortion elites love about  Parker  is  his  skin color. Any opposition he faces from white pro-lifers not associated with Christianity can be easily dismissed as bigotry. Sweep under the rug for a minute that even black celebrities are accusing abortion providers in black communities of genocide. While Planned Parenthood’s media arm proclaims support of black lives  its other arm is reaching for a pair of forceps to end life for hundreds of black babies each day.
In the tradition of the black slave owners in the Confederate South  Parker makes his money by breaking the backs (or spines and what-have-you) of others  many of whom share his skin color. He can’t admit that his work (some have called it his “ministry”) hurts his own people or it’d affect his bottom line. Abortion advocates want us all to simply accept that black lives only matter once they’ve had the privilege of being born. This brings us to the final contradiction of  Parker ’s platform.
 Parker  considers  himself  a feminist.  He  believes  he  is bettering the future for females. Don’t think too long about the number of female lives  he ’s ended before they’ve begun. This is nothing new to the insane logic of abortion advocacy. If they can successfully shift our attention off the rights of the life inside the womb to the perceived “rights” the pregnant woman has over her inhabited womb  they’ve succeeded.
 Parker ’s public persona is a farce.  He  parades the myth that  he  has a moral responsibility to “help women” while  he  strips them of their own responsibility to the children they’ve conceived. Christianity places value upon the lives of black women  so much so that it envisions a world in which their lives aren’t ended in the womb. But maybe we’re the ones who are deceiving pregnant women? Perhaps we’re the ones getting rich by volunteering with crisis pregnancy centers and giving away free pregnancy tests  ultrasounds  and diapers.
[EX A]: Willie Parker

[EX Q]: Richard Spencer  says  he  couldn't find a lawyer to defend  him  against a lawsuit seeking to hold the prominent white nationalist  among others  responsible for the violence last August in Charlottesville  Virginia.
Spencer  representing  himself   filed papers on Tuesday asking a judge to dismiss the lawsuit  which was filed by Charlottesville residents and protesters who said they were harmed — some physically  some mentally or emotionally — by the violence that erupted during white supremacist demonstrations.  A man accused of driving into a crowd of antiracist protesters —  one woman was killed and dozens were injured — is facing criminal charges  and there were clashes between demonstrators throughout the weekend.
 Spencer  is arguing that anything  he  allegedly did in connection with the events in Charlottesville were covered by the First Amendment's speech protections and the Second Amendment's protection of the right to bear arms.
In making the case for  dismissal  Spencer  wrote that the individuals suing  him  had "enormous resources at their disposal" — the plaintiffs are represented by attorneys from three law firms — and were using the legal system "to intimidate  silence  financially damage  or generally harass"  him  and the other defendants.
 Spencer  wrote that  he  tried to find legal help  but couldn't find a lawyer licensed in Virginia to represent  him .  He  didn't provide details about  his  search for counsel  but suggested  his  lack of success was because lawyers didn't want to be associated with  him .  He  wrote that  he  couldn't find a lawyer "despite the supposed but
"I get into a conversation with a lawyer and it will end up with  'Oh  this is very controversial  it could affect my career '"  Spencer  said.
 He  said that if the judge denies his motion to dismiss  he would renew his search for an attorney.
"It's been a very difficult struggle. I don't think it's going to be impossible  but it's clearly difficult just because I’m controversial "  he  said.
 Spencer  is among more than two dozen defendants named in the lawsuit.  His  co-defendants include individuals and groups identified as white nationalist or white supremacist accused of organizing or participating in the events in Charlottesville that turned violent. One anti-racism protester  Heather Heyer  was killed when a car plowed into the crowd; the man accused of driving the car  James Alex Fields Jr.  is facing criminal charges and is also named as a defendant in the same civil lawsuit as  Spencer .
The plaintiffs in the civil case  filed in the US District Court for the Western District of Virginia  allege  Spencer  and the other defendants engaged in a conspiracy to violate civil rights  in violation of federal and Virginia laws. They accused  Spencer  of leading a torchlight rally across the University of Virginia campus on Aug. 11  promoting the "Unite the Right" rally in Charlottesville the next day  and of inciting "intimidation and violence based racial  religious  and ethnic animosity."
In his court papers on Tuesday   Spencer  wrote that  his  previous statements embracing white nationalist ideas did not amount to a call for violence. The lawsuit quotes  him  as saying  "What brings us together is that we are white  we are a people. We will not be replaced."  Spencer  argued that rather than a call for violence  that language was "consistently defensive in nature."
 Spencer  wrote that  he  had participated in peaceful demonstrations in the past  and blamed the violence at these events on the antifacist  or antifa  movement.  He  disputed that the torchlight rally was intended to be violent  saying the organizers had tried to keep it secret in advance and didn't invite counterprotesters. On the phone with BuzzFeed News   he  said that  he  wasn't involved in organizing the events in Charlottesville and described the lawsuit as "lawfare" designed to waste  his  time and drain  his  financial resources.
Other defendants have also moved to dismiss the lawsuit  and  Spencer  concluded  his  filing by saying that  he  was adopting arguments raised in some of those motions as well. Other defendants are represented by counsel  but  Spencer  told BuzzFeed News that  he  wanted to separately pursue  his  defense because there could be "conflicting strategies."
Charlottesville officials and local business are pursuing another lawsuit in the Circuit Court for the City of Charlottesville against groups accused of organizing the August rally  seeking a court order to stop them from participating in alleged "unlawful paramilitary activity" in the future.  Spencer  is not a defendant in that case.
[EX A]:
Richard Spencer Said