We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

[EX Q]: Sent1: The only case you could possibly make is more accidents with more guns at gun shows.
 Sent2: The only way the person would get the gun back is if the person was found not guilty.
[EX A]: Not similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: Also once you become an agent of the government you stop having right, you have authorities and you're controlled by the people the Constitution is supposed to protect you against.
 Sent2: But now if you mention that you want to defend yourself against unfair actions by the government, it wouldn't ever hold up.
[EX A]: Not similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: So now you're saying that just because somebody owns a gun, they're somehow more likely to start killing people than somebody who doesn't own a gun?
 Sent2: Ian brought up the point that guns make you more likely to kill a person.
[EX A]:
Similar