In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

[EX Q]: Comment: If these pipelines are successfully blocked we could be seeing the beginning of the  end for confederation as we know it.  It is not as if those against pipelines are actually acting as if they are concerned about the environment. They still want al the advantages  of oil. The store shelves would be empty without oil.  Then there are those that go home and heat their homes and cook using the dirtiest fuel  called wood and or biomass.  ( it should be BioMESS)
[EX A]: Non-obscene

[EX Q]: Comment: Human proxies for Salman Rushdi continue to be attacked and killed in the western World by the same religion that is conducting  reciprocal mass murders in the Middle East.

Trudeau has  brought thousands into Canada and more are pouring across our borders due to relaxed visa requirements instituted by Trudeau for " mexicans".

Just in time, as Al Quada have now just perfected the lap top and iPad bomb for flights from Canada into the US.
All will be denied and Aga Khan will continue to contribute to the Trudeau Foundation and provide free holidays for the Trudeau family.

This disaster was all so easily predicted.

Yet, 40 % of canadian voters behaved like sheep to the slaughter.

How green we are..
[EX A]: Non-obscene

[EX Q]: Comment: damn, they took that out, too! Hey, "Oh let's have an honest debate" people, let's debate just how badly you suck.
[EX A]:
Obscene