We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

[EX Q]: Sent1: I dont believe that someone who killed or raped a lot of people should be able to live even if they are in a jail surrounded by other criminals.
 Sent2: What if there were people killing other people, escaping from jail, doing it again etc.
[EX A]: Not similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: The death penalty has never been shown to be a deterent to murder.
 Sent2: There is absolutely ZERO evidence that the death penalty deters crime.
[EX A]: Similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: So all in all I believe in the death penalty.
 Sent2: I don't believe the death penalty should be allowed for circumstantial evidenc.
[EX A]:
Not similar