instruction:
In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.
question:
Comment: The real world isn't like being a reality TV show host with a twitter account is it?

Let's hope this kind of absurdity doesn't lead to something devastating like a war because he heard some random crap a talk show host said.
answer:
Obscene


question:
Comment: Yes, Comrade! Of course a PROGRESSIVE Income Tax where the sucessful minority pays all of the tax.

Why bother, why don't we just kill all the rich and take all of their money (just kidding). After all, that worked out so very well for the Russian peasants, didn't it?
answer:
Non-obscene


question:
Comment: Well then Phil, you must be opposed to the Supreme Court interpreting the First Amendment to mean that corporations possess a separate freedom of speech, and that money is speech. Right? Our Constitution isn't a roadmap or an operators manual giving specific instructions about how to do everything. Nobody in 1788 had any idea, for instance, that we would need regulation of radio spectra. Our Constitution sets broad goals and divides powers among the federal government and the states, and defines broadly the establishment of an Executive, a Legislative body, and a Judicial hierarchy. If our Constitution didn't need daily interpretation we would have no need for the Judicial. Without the Judicial the Executive would usurp all powers, and we don't want that, do we. Right now we are seeing that check and balance impeding the raw will of our president. It's a great show and we need to pay less attention to Trump's absurd theatrics and keep our eyes on the real show.
answer:

Non-obscene