Given a document, an entity and its sentiment towards the entity, verify if it is the correct sentiment towards the entity. Answer should be yes or no. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].
--------
Question: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Rex Tillerson is Negative . (CNN) This past weekend at the Aspen Security Forum  the rumor mill was working overtime on the idea that Secretary of State Rex Tillerson was seriously considering resigning   if not immediately then by the end of the year.
We have written a number of pieces about  Tillerson 's travails -- some self-inflicted but most undeniably a result of the stunningly idiosyncratic and harmful way the President's statements and tweets have gummed up the foreign policy machinery.
 Tillerson  has indeed had a rough time. Having worked for and seen our fair share of secretaries of state come and go  we've never witnessed anything like this. Usually a president will designate the secretary of state as his voice and the key repository of authority on foreign policy. And whether the President chooses to empower the nation's top diplomat on the big issues somewhat (Hillary Clinton) or all the way (Jim Baker)  the secretary is the primary adviser to the President on foreign policy.
We understand  Tillerson 's frustrations. But we'd also respectfully argue that    however stacked the deck may be against  him    Tillerson  shouldn't quit. And here's why.
And to do so   Tillerson  would need a very compelling reason that would not only make sense to  him   but would also protect  his  public reputation and credibility. Vance left because of his profound opposition to Carter's decision to launch an almost certainly doomed military mission to rescue the American hostages in Iran. Frustration with the bureaucracy  unhappiness with the President's governing style or pique over a backbiting White House just aren't compelling reasons commensurate with the status of the job.
Right now  based on everything we know   Tillerson  just doesn't have one such reason. And an early out  particularly for a guy who took the job claiming he wanted to serve his country  would damage his reputation and add a sad coda to the end of his State Department stewardship.
It's true that the headlines for  Tillerson  don't look all that good. He may have a great deal of contact with the President and have been the one Trump chose to attend the meeting with Putin on the margins at the G20  but unless the President makes it clear that the Secretary is his main adviser on some issue and  Tillerson  steps up to take charge of it  he's not going to be seen as having much influence.
 Tillerson  has a small army behind  him  to put out diplomatic fires and manage crises. But like any good general  to achieve the mission  he  needs to delegate authority and trust  his  subordinates.
It's not just that  Tillerson  has been undercut from above;  he  has also not been well served from below  but this is a self-inflicted wound. The secretary is squandering his most precious asset -- the immensely talented  intelligent  experienced  hardworking and capable people who man the trenches at Foggy Bottom.
News flash: the bureaucracy at State is not the enemy  so  Tillerson  should stop treating it like one.  He 's trying to run the department in a highly centralized and tightly controlled manner like Jim Baker. It worked for Baker because  he  had the horsepower in  his  inner circle.  Tillerson  is not as fortunate.
Instead   he  should emulate the more decentralized and inclusive management model of George Shultz  who empowered the other senior officials in the department to take the initiative and backed them 100% even when they stumbled. If  Tillerson  gives these officials the authority  support and tools they need to do their job  they will help  him  and the department to be more effective.
 His  successor could be worse
As ineffectual  at times  as  Tillerson  has been  it cannot be assumed that things couldn't get any worse under new management. For all his stumbles  the Secretary of State has gotten a few big things right. He has  for example  been a soothing voice in reassuring US allies  particularly Japan and South Korea of America's defense commitments. He has developed a good relationship with Secretary of Defense James Mattis -- and on some issues (even though he's lost on a couple  like US withdrawal from the Paris accord on climate change)  he has moderated some of Trump's worst instincts  such as walking away from the nuclear deal with Iran. He's also talked tough on maintaining existing sanctions on Russia  which may have helped stiffen the President's resolve as well.
There's no guarantee that his successor will play well with others  hand-hold the allies rather than throw bombs at them or elevate diplomacy  engagement and dialogue with difficult countries rather than adopt confrontational policies that offer little prospect for success but significant risks of escalation. For all those who hope to wish Tillerson an early and happy retirement  be careful what you wish for    especially if  his  successor is more ideological and combative and less pragmatic than the more even-keeled Tillerson.
 Tillerson  does not have a small ego.  He  doesn't want to be the answer to the question in a game of Trivial Pursuit of which Secretary of State holds the record for the shortest tenure in the modern era. And from  his  many years as a world class negotiator   he  should have a sixth sense for when to hold and when to fold. Now is not the time to fold.

Answer: no


Question: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Harry Hohmeister is Negative . Lufthansa ’ s ( LHAG . DE ) first flight from Berlin to the United States in over 16 years took off on Wednesday   although a slow start to sales shows the difficulties involved in trying to replace the gaps left by insolvent rival Air Berlin . FILE PHOTO : A Lufthansa Airbus A321 - 200 plane is seen at Tegel airport in Berlin   Germany   November 2   2017 . REUTERS / Axel Schmidt Germany ’ s second largest carrier Air Berlin ( AB1 . DE ) filed for insolvency in August and carried out its last flight at the end of last month   leaving a gap in the market for long - haul flights from the German capital in particular . “ Of course bookings are slow at this stage  ”  Lufthansa board member Harry Hohmeister  told Reuters at Berlin ’ s Tegel airport ahead of the departure of the flight to New York ’ s JFK on Wednesday .  He  said that usually Lufthansa would give 12 months notice of a new long - haul route   or eight months at a minimum   but in this case it had only six weeks to sell tickets ahead of the first flight . “ The next four weeks will be difficult   then we get a peak at Christmas time and then it will develop better   otherwise we wouldn ’ t do it  ”  Hohmeister  said . Lufthansa has traditionally shied away from long - haul flights from Berlin   instead flying intercontinental routes from its hubs in Frankfurt and Munich .  Hohmeister  said the Lufthansa group was currently looking at other long - haul options from Berlin   but that any would likely be flown by its budget arm Eurowings . Lufthansa is currently awaiting EU approval for a deal to take over large parts of Air Berlin   which will see it adding 81 planes to the group . The collapse of Air Berlin means Berlin Airports will see a dip in passenger number growth this year after a period of strong demand . Britain ’ s easyJet ( EZJ . L )  which is planning to take over some Air Berlin operations at Tegel   has said it expects to run a reduced schedule this winter from the airport . “ We expect that new partners will quickly bring growth  ” Berlin Airports CEO Engelbert Luetke Dalderup said   urging Lufthansa to “ never say never ” to the idea of Berlin as a hub .

Answer: no


Question: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Bill Clinton is Neutral . With allegations of sexual misconduct now swirling around U.S. Senate candidate Judge Roy Moore  the left and the liberal media are finally starting to take stock of their long-running defense of their favorite accused rapist and serial philanderer   Bill Clinton .
Consider the liberal publication “The Atlantic ” which has published a story with this headline and introduction: “Bill Clinton: A Reckoning. Feminists saved the 42nd president of the United States in the 1990s. They were on the wrong side of history; is it finally time to make things right?"
“The accusers of Bill Clinton back in the '90s were never given the credence and treated with the same respect that [Moore’s accusers] are being treated ” CNN’s Jake Tapper said. “And I think that there is something to be said about how society has evolved since then but  in addition  it's hard not to look back at that period and think: you know what  the media treated those women poorly.”
Members of the mainstream media are actually starting to realize that what  Bill Clinton  did was beyond disgraceful. From sodomizing an intern to groping women to the alleged rape of Juanita Broaddrick  the allegations against  Clinton  have been known for years. Those of us who objected at the time were told by these same media outlets that all of this was his personal business. It did not “rise to the level of impeachment.”
Two decades later  the biased left-wing media outlets are coming to terms with what they said and did and how they covered it all up. Paula Jones  Gennifer Flowers  Kathleen Willey and several more women have all told how they were dismissed  smeared and left by the side of the road by the  Clinton  machine and the mainstream media.
To be sure  there was a reckoning in court. In 1998   Bill Clinton  ended up paying Paula Jones $850 000 in an out-of-court settlement for her to drop her sexual harassment charges against  him . And in a related case   Bill Clinton  actually lost  his  license to practice law in Arkansas for five years. And we know  Clinton  was impeached.
But to the media   he  remained a darling and a lovable rogue. What has changed? Well  maybe the media  like so many in the Democratic Party  is finally done with the Clintons. Maybe they want to look consistent when they go after Roy Moore  whose alleged transgressions pale in comparison.

Answer:
no