In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: threat and non-threat. Threat is a statement that someone will be hurt or harmed, especially if the person does not do something in particular.

Example Input: Comment: Yes, the IM law requires the Department to establish moose population objectives and the BOG approves.  In most cases, unrealistically high population objectives have been set that are unsustainable.  This is what one can expect from a BOG that is entirely hunters and hunting guides and a Department that is addicted to hunting license revenues.  The result is predictable: endless killing of bears and wolves while moose objectives are seldom reached.  And this is at a cost of over $ 1 million per year, and at a greater cost to keeping Alaska's wild ecosystems healthy.  We are allowing ourselves to be bamboozled by an inherently corrupt system that favors about 14% of the Alaskans that hunt, and its not even working for them.  Its time to "repeal, and replace" the IM law with a wildlife conservation policy that is scientifically based, preserves ecosystem health, and respects democratic principles.
Example Output: Non-threat

Example Input: Comment: Agree with "elimination"  but, if that is done, there will be no "they" after that when
we nuc them into oblivion.  Yes, eliminate them.  Use tactical nucs on each of their
hot spots and that will cripple the entire nation.  Follow up by sending in five infantry
divisions and kill anything that moves.  Only old people, women and kids will remain
and they will be free to join South Korea and live happily ever after.
Example Output: Threat

Example Input: Comment: Total nonsense !
Example Output:
Non-threat