In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

[EX Q]: Comment: Victor, Thanks for this 'column'!  Of course there is only one problem with this report. It is too short.  There is so much more 'going on out there'. 
But nothing going on in Hawaii other than the "Grapes of Wrath" responses we hear about on the news.  
As Edmund Burke said, "When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall one by one, an unpitied sacrifice in a contemptible struggle."  [In Hawai'i's case, the bad men are those whose covetousness blinds them to the unfairness of zoning and the need for regulating the housing market.
[EX A]: Non-sexual-explicit

[EX Q]: Comment: Cosby gives Blacks a bad name, no? After reading so many techniques he used with his star celebrity status, he is the BEST rapist I have ever heard of. Wonder if someone will write a crime story about him when more facts come out in the trial. It's going to be a challenger to the OJ Simpson trial. Please do hurry up and start it. I don't want him or I to die of old age too soon. It's going to be a fascinating trial. What I'm curious about are these questions. Were these women given monetary gifts afterwards? Were they looking forward to an adventure of being "raped" by a black man, especially a Hollywood celebrity? But were angry that they fell asleep and missed the fun? Why did they continue to stay if they realized they entered a room full of only well-dressed black men? Were these victims angry because they gave sex thinking they were going to get glamour or well-paying jobs? Prepare yourselves. He may just get ACQUITTED.
[EX A]: Sexual-explicit

[EX Q]: Comment: must we tolerate another elitist pompous ass on the editorial pages of the G&M? - or should I call the Donald Trump Hate Centre
[EX A]:
Sexual-explicit