We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

[EX Q]: The medium of 'free speech' has changed, but that does not affect that free speech should still exist - just as with the other constitutional points (with a few exceptions, if you believe Bush).
[EX A]: Valid

[EX Q]: Secondly, the reason that interpreting the Second Amendment isn't necessary is because Congress doesn't have the enumerated power to take guns away from the citizens.
[EX A]: Valid

[EX Q]: Well, not all colleges are government institutions and our government has traditionally banned guns from certain locations not in violation of the 2nd amendment.
[EX A]:
Valid