We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

[Q]: Sent1: I think people suffer more when they spend their whole lives in jail.
 Sent2: I dont believe that someone who killed or raped a lot of people should be able to live even if they are in a jail surrounded by other criminals.
[A]: Not similar


[Q]: Sent1: The death penalty is not used for what it is supposed to be used for.
 Sent2: I think the death penalty should only be used in extreme cases where the accused is, without a doubt, guilty.
[A]: Not similar


[Q]: Sent1: So far, I am hearing "an eye for an eye" which is just that vengeance centered sense of justice that I am arguing against.
 Sent2: What is the REASON behind "an eye for an eye" justice?
[A]:
Similar