Given a paragraph about cooking, and a set of conversational questions and answers about the paragraph, say whether the passage contains sufficient information to answer the follow-up question. Say Yes if it is answerable; otherwise, say No. The paragraph has the prefix 'CONTEXT:'. Each conversation question has a prefix `Q:` followed by the answer prefix `A:`, and the follow-up question has a prefix `FOLLOWUP_Q:`.

Input: Consider Input: CONTEXT: The key to this is really high heat and pan-fry in a single layer, very quickly. The goal is to get that nice brown caramelized surface and barely cook the interior and then get it out of the pan before it starts to seep water. Also, wait to season with salt until it comes out of the pan so it doesn't draw out the water prematurely.  <sep>  Q: How can I pan fry zucchini without making it soggy? A: The key to this is really high heat and pan-fry in a single layer  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Does using the olive oil make it soggy?

Output: No


Input: Consider Input: CONTEXT: Mesquite is a very assertive flavor that typically goes with beef, especially fatty beef.Pecan and hickory are stronger than apple, but milder than mesquite, and are great for pork or poultry, and work just fine with beef.Applewood is very flexible, a bit lighter and sweeter. It's the only one of the woods you mentioned that I would consider using with fish.Ultimately, there's no hard and fast rules - taste things and do what works for you!  <sep>  Q: How do these flavors of liquid smoke differ?###When buying liquid smoke I'm generally faced with a choice of: Hickory Apple-tree Mesquite Pecan A: Pecan and hickory are stronger than apple, but milder than mesquite, and are great for pork or poultry, and work just fine with beef  Q: Is there any way to make Apple and Mesquite stronger? A: Mesquite is a very assertive flavor that typically goes with beef, especially fatty beef  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: I'm interested in knowing things that'd help me decide what to pair them with.###Do the choices work well with Fish?

Output: Yes


Input: Consider Input: CONTEXT: The basic principle of serving a dish at a time is called Russian Service by the French, who started using it in the early 1800s. The particular order of the dishes has changed with the times and with theories of how meals should be served. The book Arranging the Meal by Flandrin describes the history of these changing fashions.There has been a debate since classic Greek times of when to have, or even whether to have, a salad course. The Greeks suggested eating after the meal to help with the ensuing drinking. The British were having it before the meal in the 1600s. By the 1800s French meals served Ã  la russe placed the salad close to the end of the meal, a tradition kept up to today. I remember reading that the starter salad, common in the US, is a simplified antipasto, but have not been able to find the reference, so for now it is just a guess.  <sep>  Q: From which culture did our North American meal progression (soup/salad/appetizer + meal + dessert) come from?###Sorry for the lag. A: There has been a debate since classic Greek times of when to have, or even whether to have, a salad course. The Greeks suggested eating after the meal to help with the ensuing drinking  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Do any other cultures have a tea-time like in Britain?


Output: No