Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.

Input: Consider Input: Ms. Patkotak, thank you,  excellent article.  The stink from Juneau is worse than an angry skunk. How I hope for a federal grand jury one day to indict some of these legislators along with the oil companies. I don't give a darn if the senate winks and lets the likes of Micciche and Meyer vote.  They can not legitimize such an immoral, corrupt, blatantly obvious betrayal of oath of office and the trust placed in them by the citizens. We need one good Snowden whistleblower who can prove that any Legislator voted in favor of the oil corporations in order to keep his job, receive "donations" for his/her designated cause, or (gasp) direct secret payments similar to what poor Bill Allen did when he was laundering money for the oilies at the Baronoff.  I believe that what they are doing is unconstitutional on it's face. We are literally paying the oil companies to steal our oil. To vote to do so is illegal even if they are not being paid off. Ostracize these scum and call them out by name.

Output: No


Input: Consider Input: Right.  Politically-expedient history revision.  Fascism is, and always has been since its inception, a right-wing political ideology.  It's proponents said so themselves.  They openly opposed left-wing political movements.  Frequently violently.  And while we're at it, black folks did not keep white folks as slaves, the Native Americans didn't cross the Atlantic and start slaughtering and dispossessing Europeans, European Jews didn't incinerate Lutherans in ovens or put them in death camps, American church women didn't rape and murder Salvadoran death squad goons and Saddam didn't have any yellow birthday cake--they ran out of yellow no. 5 food-coloring because of the sanctions.

Output: Yes


Input: Consider Input: Drunken sailors stop spending when they run out of money.


Output: No