We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

Ex Input:
I would argue, for example, that since so called ���assault weapons��� are not as common today as handguns then they must be more ���dangerous and unususal��� and therefore more subject to a ban.

Ex Output:
Valid


Ex Input:
It is true that nations such as Switzerland have just as many guns percapita, and Canada probably comes fairly close too, but their gun related deaths are many times lower than that of the US.

Ex Output:
Valid


Ex Input:
The report cites both studies that do find positive effects and studies that do not find positive effects.

Ex Output:

Valid