Given a document and an entity the task is to select the author's sentiment towards the entity. Sentiments can be Positive, Neutral and Negative. Select Positive if the article expresses a positive view towards the given entity or praises its quality or skills. Select Neutral if the document expresses no clear view towards the entity or has equal amounts of positive and negative statements or expressing some fact/quote by someone else. Select Negative if the article expresses a negative view towards like harsh remarks, criticizing entities action/decision etc. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

Ex Input:
What is the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Hari Menon ? Investors picked up stakes in BigBasket through secondary share purchases as well   chief executive Hari Menon  told Reuters on Friday  declining to give a breakdown other than to say Alibaba now owns the biggest slice.
BigBasket  which sells everything from vegetables to shampoo  will use the funds to improve its technology  analytics  infrastructure and marketing   Menon  said.
The Bengaluru-headquartered firm  which also plans to build farmer networks and expand deeper into Indian cities where they operate  expects to break even between 2020 and 2022   Menon  added.
BigBasket is planning to sign a deal with Paytm E-Commerce that runs online marketplace  Paytm Mall  allowing both firms to leverage each others strengths   Menon  said.
Under the deal  which will become effective in the first half of this year  Paytm will become the default payments provider to BigBasket while BigBasket will be able to cross-sell groceries on Paytm Mall   Menon  said.

Ex Output:
Neutral


Ex Input:
What is the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Hillary Clinton ? Former secretary of  state Hillary Clinton  speaks to and meets voters in Allendale  Mich.  on Nov. 7  2016. (Melina Mara/The Washington Post)
How do you write a primal scream? Because my head is about to explode over the story about alleged sexual harassment on  Hillary Clintonâs  2008 presidential campaign and  her  appallingly mild response  then and now.
To recap  while we were still reeling from the report that President Trump ordered the firing of special counsel Robert S. Mueller III last summer  the New York Times posted this: âHillary Clinton Chose to Shield a Top Adviser Accused of Harassment in 2008.â
According to the Timesâ Maggie Haberman and Amy Chozick  Burns Strider   Clintonâs  faith adviser â yes  faith adviser  you canât make this stuff up â was accused of repeatedly sexually harassing a young woman with whom he shared a campaign office. The Times: â She  told a campaign official that Mr. Strider had rubbed  her  shoulders inappropriately  kissed  her  on the forehead and sent  her  a string of suggestive emails.â
The campaignâs response? Campaign manager Patti Solis Doyle recommended that Strider be fired. So did Jess OâConnell  the national director of operations  who handled the investigation. And  Clinton  herself? Not so much  apparently. The young woman  not identified in the story  was moved to a different job. Strider â then married  by the way â was âdocked several weeks of pay and ordered to undergo counseling.â Which  predictably  he never attended.
And  even more predictably  when he was hired years later to oversee an independent group backing  Clintonâs  second presidential campaign  âHe was fired after several months for workplace issues  including allegations that he harassed a young female aide  according to three people close to Correct the Recordâs management.â
This is head-exploding stuff  but thereâs worse to come. Because now â now  after Harvey Weinstein and #MeToo and Roy Moore â this was Hillary Clintonâs belated response  in its bland totality: âA story appeared today about something that happened in 2008. I was dismayed when it occurred  but was heartened the young woman came forward  was heard  and had her concerns taken seriously and addressed.â
And classically  infuriatingly  this episode and its aftermath exposes  once again  the trademark Clinton failure to take personal responsibility; the allergy to owning up to error; the refusal to cede any ground  no less apologize; the incessant double-standarding  with different  more forgiving rules for the Clintons and their loyalists. Imagine a Hillary Clinton who said something like this:
Imagine that Hillary Clinton. She doesnât exist.

Ex Output:
Negative


Ex Input:
What is the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Poo ? "We're excited —  extremely excited " Mu-ming Poo of the Chinese Academy of Sciences  said. "This is really  I think  a breakthrough for biomedicine."
 He  sees a need to have "genetically identical monkeys for studying many human diseases  especially brain diseases" such as Alzheimer's  Huntington's and Parkinson's disease.
The Chinese scientists acknowledge that any new technology can be abused. But they stress they have no interest in ever trying to clone a person. "Technically speaking one can clone human " Poo says. "But we're not going to do it. There's absolutely no plan to do anything on humans."
Poo's team succeeded by removing the DNA from fetal monkeys instead of using adult cells as a starting point. The scientists then transferred the genes into monkey eggs that had had their own DNA removed.
The next step was also crucial   Poo  says. The researchers stimulated the eggs to develop into embryos with a new mix of chemical signals. "The trick is we choose the right chemicals to turn on these genes we transfer into the egg "  Poo  says. "So that's what we did different. I think that's the key."
"They are lively. They are walking  jumping  playing around like all newborn baby monkeys " Poo says  adding that so far they seem very healthy.

Ex Output:

Positive