The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the small-talk strategy, otherwise output No. small-talk is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used for discussing topics apart from the negotiation, in an attempt to build a rapport with the opponent. For example, discussing how the opponent is doing during the pandemic or sharing excitement for the camping trip.

[EX Q]: Context: 'I believe we can work with 1 food and 2 waters.🙂' 'So 1 package of firewood, 2 food and 1 water for me and 2 packages of  firewood, 1 food and 2 waters for you? Sound good? ' 'Yes I get 2 packages of firewood, 1 food and 2 waters. Sounds like a good deal.🙂'
Utterance: 'So we have a deal🙂 Thanks!'
[EX A]: No

[EX Q]: Context: 'That is simply unacceptable.' 'well how about i get 2 water, 2 food and 1 firewood' 'Here is the offer.  For you: 3 water 0 food 1 firewood'
Utterance: 'what about instead of firewood, I get 1 food, so it will be 3 water, 1 food and 0 firewood'
[EX A]: No

[EX Q]: Context: 'I can't give out all the water. I need to be hydrated as well. ' 'You already have all the basics, though, so you won't lack sufficient water to be hydrated. I have a serious medical condition that requires that I have access to additional water. ' 'The maximum bundle I can give is all packages of food + 1 package of water'
Utterance: 'Sorry, that won't work for me. I've already said that I have a medical condition that requires additional water. You do not need that much water just to be hydrated -- you already have basic water. I can give you all of the firewood, but I need all of the water. '
[EX A]:
No