instruction:
Given a document, an entity and its sentiment towards the entity, verify if it is the correct sentiment towards the entity. Answer should be yes or no. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].
question:
Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Jacob Zuma is Neutral . JOHANNESBURG (Reuters) - South Africaâs ruling African National Congress party on Tuesday put off a key meeting due to discuss President Jacob Zumaâs future later this week  while an online news service quoted sources saying he was ready to quit if certain conditions were met.
 Zuma  has been in a weakened position since  he  was replaced as leader of the ANC by Deputy President Cyril Ramaphosa in December.  Zuma  no longer holds a top position in the party.
But the scheduled meeting of the National Executive Committee  which has the power to demand that  Zuma  step down  was suddenly moved to the weekend of Feb. 17.
The party has faced uncertainty over how its dual power structure will function  after Ramaphosa took the reins of the party with  Zuma  remaining as head of state. Zumaâs tenure officially runs until mid-2019.
Then  Times Live  an online news service  issued a report citing sources saying  Zuma  would resign as soon as a list of preconditions has been finalised in a deal struck with Ramaphosa.
Magashule  who attended the meeting between the two leaders  would not confirm whether  Zuma  had agreed to resign  although other ANC leaders said the agreed deal would see  Zuma  âgo in a dignified wayâ  Times Live said.
 Zuma  has been South Africaâs most controversial president since the end of white minority rule in 1994  enwrapped in scandal during a tumultuous nine years in power.
 He  has faced several allegations of corruption. Some within the ANC and the opposition say the Gupta family  friends of  Zuma   have used their links with the president to win work with the state. The Guptas and  Zuma  have denied any wrongdoing.
 He  waved to reporters after meeting Ramaphosa at the presidentâs office in Cape Town  where the president also chaired routine meetings   his  spokesman said.
Members of the media are seen behind a bust of Nelson Mandela outside Parliament after it was announced that the State of the Nation address  due to be delivered by  President Jacob Zuma   has been postponed  in Cape Town  South Africa  February 6  2018. REUTERS/Sumaya Hisham
In a statement  the presidency denied claims by the South African Communist Party  a key ally of the ruling party  that  Zuma  was preparing to fire Ramaphosa as deputy president and replace  him  with ex-wife  Nkosazana Dlamini Zuma.
Facing a no-confidence motion in parliament set for Feb. 22   Zuma  has survived several attempts to oust  him  in the past. But this time around a significant part of the ANC wants  him  to step down well before  his  second term ends mid next year.
The opposition parties had demanded that the speech be postponed until  Zuma  was removed from the leadership.
The rand  which has tended to strengthen on signs that  Zuma  could step down before  his  second term as president ends next year  was firmer on Tuesday.
The ANCâs top six most powerful officials met  Zuma  late on Sunday at  his  official residence in Pretoria. There was no announcement of the outcome though sources said  he  had refused a demand to go.
 Zuma  has also resisted a call to go by Zulu King Goodwill Zwelithini  the influential head of South Africaâs biggest ethnic group in the presidentâs home province of KwaZulu-Natal  according to BusinessDay newspaper.
answer:
no


question:
Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Jerry Richardson is Neutral . It has been a long time since two teams induced as many sofa spasms as the New England Patriots and Pittsburgh Steelers did  with those three false endings in the last two minutes. You thought  finally  the NFL is all about the game again. But just then  the skin-crawly headline came across the bottom of the screen  turning attention away from Tom Brady and Ben Roethlisberger to an old pot-belly named Jerry Richardson.
[Panthers owner Jerry Richardson announces plan to sell team amid NFL investigation]
Yet the viewer’s head swiveled back and forth between the Patriots-Steelers epic in the icing rain  and the alleged fetishes and racial attitudes of Carolina Panthers owner  Richardson  in  his  owner suite. On Friday  the Panthers announced that Richardson was being investigated for workplace abuses  and by Sunday morning  the story had exploded when Sports Illustrated published a host of sordid specific accusations ranging from sexual harassment to using a racial slur against an employee. These included Richardson supposedly asking to shave the legs of female employees and demanding to examine their backsides in their jeans.
But that wasn’t the end of the NFL day. Not thirty minutes after the final play in Pittsburgh  with fans still filing out of the stadium  came the seismic announcement that  Richardson  will be selling the Panthers  the franchise  he  has owned since it was founded in 1993. No explanation was offered  or needed. You have to assume that the disclosures were going to get uglier.
[Analysis: Forget the catch rule. The league has a replay problem] 
Richardson  is a perfect example of the extent to which the sheer girths of owners’ egos are eclipsing what should be the NFL’s true narrative: the game. Their incessant internecine rivalries and power struggles have become a chronic story line. It was  Richardson  who set the poisonous current tone of management-player relations  when  he  declared during the 2011 collective bargaining that the owners had “a [expletive] deal and we’re going to take back our league and [expletive] do something about it.” It was  Richardson  who  inexplicably grown arrogant on  his  Hardees franchise money  sat across a table and barked at Peyton Manning: “Do I need to help you read a revenue chart  son? Because I don’t know if you know how to read that.”
Richardson  no doubt  is also capable of individual kindness  and other owners will profess sorrow over his decision to sell  and wax nostalgic over the fact that he once caught passes from Johnny Unitas with the 1959-60 Baltimore Colts.  Richardson  is a self-made man  the first player since George Halas to acquire an ownership stake. But  Richardson   sadly  has acted as a toxic hardliner devoted to ensuring that no other player would ever be treated like a partner or equal.
answer:
yes


question:
Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Prager U is Neutral . Popular conservative/libertarian channel  Prager U  is once again being censored by Google and YouTube for a video deemed too “hateful.”
The video is titled “Born to Hate Jews ” and while the title seems dark  the message is the exact opposite. The speaker this time around is Kasim Hafeez  founder of the Israel Campaign  and in the video  he  tells the story of  his  journey from being a Muslim who came very close to being a terrorist against Israel  to a man whose first hand education led  him  to stand with country  he  previously hated.
The core of  his  message is that  he  discovered that Israel is not the horrible  oppressive  and murderous state that many Muslim parents teach their children  and college professors teach their students.  He  uses the story to point out that education about  his  enemy turned  his  enemy into  his  friend.
“YouTube’s removal of PragerU’s video is particularly alarming. YouTube labeled the video as ‘hate speech ’ which is ironic since the video is about fighting hatred and anti-Semitism  and is presented by a Muslim ” said Prager U’s Communication Director Jared Sichel.
Google and YouTube have censored  Prager U  in the past as well  having placed some of their educational content in the “restricted” column  which would block videos from being seen in places like schools  where these videos would have the most impact.
While  Prager U’s  videos have not carried mainstream messages  and even covered topics from views that are not politically correct   they  have never been inflammatory  obscene  or hateful. That YouTube is labeling this video promoting peace  understanding  and factuality as “hate speech” raises questions that should be asked about what values lay at the heart of the company.
answer:

no