In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: threat and non-threat. Threat is a statement that someone will be hurt or harmed, especially if the person does not do something in particular.

[EX Q]: Comment: Democrats should have every legal right to arm themselves and kill other Democrats! That is their right and they should stand up for their rights!
[EX A]: Threat

[EX Q]: Comment: If a dude is actively threatening to kill someone, a head shot with a scoped .308 or .223 may be reasonable.  The same is not true of a dude sitting alone in his house.  In the latter case, there is no active threat.  We people instruct police to kill the dude anyway just to prove that they must do what we want when we want it.  Okay, if that is the kind of society we want, so be it.  Recall, that we really know nothing about what the dude did, but I guess the point is that we should kill him to teach others to do what police officers tell them regardless of the circumstance.  Okay, whatever.  We craft the society in our image and reap the benefit when citizens kill because we have taught them how little value life has.
[EX A]: Threat

[EX Q]: Comment: "The conduct brings shame upon the profession." - says the Ontario College of Nurses. The investigation brings shame upon the College! What a useless organization run likely by people who should be in some other profession where they won't be able to put people in harm's way. It should be sued by the surviving families for not pulling this serial killer's licence to practice when it knew there were problems. I suppose if the deaths were due to incompetence rather than intent Wettlaufer would still be practicing. Disgusting!
[EX A]:
Non-threat