The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.

[Q]: Context: 'Hello I would like to take 3 extra food packages and 3 extra water package and 1 extra firewood packages because we had some unexpected guest join us on our camping trip.🙂' 'I need 3 food packages as it is required to feed children who visited unexpectedly. Instead you can take water and firewood' 'No that doesn't work for me. I also have children with me. 4 children in total.  how about i take 2 food packages and 2 water packages and you take 1 food 1 water and 3 firewood packages.'
Utterance: 'I too have the same issue. I am also asking for children only , better you could accept 1 food , 2 water and 3 firewood, I hope this deal will work out for you'
[A]: Yes


[Q]: Context: 'We need some firewood too, though! ☹️ Let's try to make a deal that benefits us both! 🙂 Could I have 1 firewood, 3 food, and 3 waters?' 'I meant I would give you my firewood, what would you trade in return?' 'Oh sorry for the confusion. 😮 In that case, thank you for the generosity! 🙂 How about if I have 3 firewood, 1 food, and 1 water?'
Utterance: 'I can do that for 3 food and 3 water?'
[A]: No


[Q]: Context: 'Hello, what is your preference for supplies?  I would prefer to have as much extra firewood as possible, but am relatively indifferent to the rest.'
Utterance: 'yes we have to supply more how much you want'
[A]:
No