In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: threat and non-threat. Threat is a statement that someone will be hurt or harmed, especially if the person does not do something in particular.

[Q]: Comment: I disagree. Start by digging two graves...
[A]: Threat


[Q]: Comment: When I said I am not pro-Jewish I also said I wasn't anti-Jewish. I to be "pro" something requires me to want more of it - which I don't because it's not MY decision to make. How many children Jewish people have is entirely THEIR decision and I respect that.

I believe, above all, in live and let live.
But live-and-let-live is a form of tolerance. Tolerance is a peace treaty. I'll let you be whoever the hell you want to be, think whatever you want, believe whatever crazy stuff you want and defend your right to do so.
But like any peace treaty, it can only apply to others who sign onto the same thing. You must agree to do the same for me. 

You believe in Jesus ? Good for you. You try to make LAWS to force ME to obey what you say his laws are: we have a problem.
You believe in Allah ? Good for you. You try to interfere in my life because of it - problem.

The vast majority of all people accept the treaty. The minority of fundamentalists do not and get no tolerance.
[A]: Non-threat


[Q]: Comment: Obama's TWO-TERM Presidency was the paragon of executive order and stability.  

On the other hand, the legislative branch in Congress was controlled by chaos-frenzied stone-walling Republicans.  Now they have control of the House, Senate, AND (with some thanks owing to Putin) the White House - so people shouldn't be surprised at the entire sad state of discourse, chaos, constant lies and conspiratorial affairs in this joke of a US "gubament".   The only question is how long this will last before the American people wake up and start calling him and his team out.
[A]:
Non-threat