The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.
--------
Question: Context: 'Hmmm i don't beleive i ever offered you everything for all the food. I will need at least one water. lets not be selfish.' 'Oh you are right sorry, I was mistaken.  Okay then, how about I get 1 food, 2 waters, and 3 firewood.  You can have 2 food and 1 water?' 'Well that would give you 6 rations and me 3. Again that is not very fair. If you want 1 food and all the fire wood that i need at least 2 waters. so again, 1 food, 1 water 3 wood for you'
Utterance: 'Okay, you have a deal. 🙂'

Answer: No


Question: Context: 'That sounds good but I need two foods please.' 'Hmm. :( How about I get 2 food and you get 1? That way it'll be slightly more equal' 'Since you are getting two firewoods I need two foods Let's deal on this.'
Utterance: 'Ok. Then how about I get two waters. I need the food, too. I got four mouths to feed. '

Answer: Yes


Question: Context: 'hai friend, me and my team going to trip on some snow fall place i want some help from you' 'Yeah sure. I do my level best .'
Utterance: 'okay friend. In my team old age sicked peoples and kids are there so i need some extra package.'

Answer:
Yes