In this task, you must classify if a given review is positive/negative, indicating your answer as P or N.

Example Input: in a flashback , the teenage girl in the eccentric family in the canadian film , the hanging garden , tells her senile grandmother that she is going to a school dance .
horrified , the grandmother wants to know if her granddaughter knows " the rule of 6 .
" if you do n't break off a kiss by the count of 6 , then you committed a sin with the boy .
and most of all , the grandmother wants to know if she has " protection ?
"
she must carry a rosary in her pocket at all times .
the richly acted film is written and directed by thom fitzgerald in a quirky but loving style .
although some may refer to the film as yet another dysfunctional family picture , that moniker misses the mark .
yes , every member of the household has their own special problems , but the writer did n't choose to name so many characters for various flowers by accident .
this delightful little picture mixes love , tragedy and pathos , resulting in a hopeful and almost magical concoction .
during the opening credits we observe the boy , sweet william , at the center of the story .
first , he 's an average sized young lad who is slapped off - screen by his father .
next , he 's 300 pound teenager , played with hopelessness and depression by troy veinotte .
when the opening credits end , we cut to 10 years later .
william is now an average - sized , reasonably happy adult , played with love and compassion by chris leavins .
william has returned after 10 years absence to attend the marriage of his free - spirited and foul - mouthed sister rosemary to his first childhood lover , fletcher ( joe s .
keller ) .
kerry fox from an angel at my table and shallow grave plays rosemary with a compelling joy .
nicole burnell , who gave such a devastating performance in the sweet hereafter , plays the teenage rosemary .
the father of the family , whiskey mac ( peter macneill ) , is an alcoholic autocrat who is more obnoxious than harmful .
his wife , iris ( seana mckenna ) , says that she would have left him years ago to at least go to some place warm were it not for her lack of money and her obligations to the kids . rounding out the family is christine dunsworth as nine - year - old violet , the sister whom william meets for the first time .
as the exuberant irish music fills the air at the wedding in the family home , william wanders off to try on one of his old coats , which causes him to laugh at the size of his former self .
the director manages to stage simple scenes in wonderfully imaginative ways .
he takes a common wedding dress train and uses it to set up scenes in fresh and fascinating ways .
rosmary 's trip to the bathroom after drinking too much beer is beautifully orchestrated , and kerry fox is at her hilarious best trying to cope with the long train in a small bath , all while talking to her brother . as much as anything , the film is a series of character sketches .
in one of the strongest we watch william in a flashback as he has his first sexual encounter , a homosexual one . although he is perfectly happy liking the same sex , his mother is aghast .
a woman friend of hers suggests she take william to a local housewife , dusty miller ( martha irving ) , who , for a fee , will have heterosexual sex with william .
with absolute finesse the director crafts a subtle scene that manages to yield significant emotional punch without being sensational .
dusty , after asking iris to watch her daughter , takes william and gently introduces him to the joys of sex with the opposite sex .
all of this notwithstanding
, he still prefers males .
the film is at its most poignant in several sequences in which the grown william comes face - to - face with himself when younger .
this causes his ugly old memories to be reignited .
in the most devastating , he has to come to grips with his former self who was so overwhelmed with the stress that he tried to hang himself .
even here , the director touches your heart without ever letting the story dissolve into anything approaching a tearjerker .
the ultimate result is an uplifting story that has more hope that one would ever expect from the outline of its plot .
the hanging garden runs 1 : 31 .
it is rated r for strong sexuality , language , violence and some teen drug use and would be acceptable for teenagers only if they are quite old and mature .
Example Output: P

Example Input: contrary to the title , " the boxer " is not another rocky story only this time spliced with some cold hard politics .
it 's actually three movies in one : a political film , a boxing film , and a love story .
all of these work in their own respects and have some pretty decent balancing betwixt the three elements of the story , but somehow it seems kind of cliched and unoriginal .
we 've seen it all before , and we 're just not blown away with it like we should be .
oh well .
it 's
still an excellent irish story .
"
the boxer " of the title is danny flynn ( jim sheridan staple daniel day - lewis ) , an ex - ira member who gets out of a belfast prison after 14 years , and finds out that his troubles are far from over .
first off , the ira is having a small civil war between its leader joe hamill ( brian cox ) , and one of its sub - leaders , harry ( gerard mcsorley ) , both having opposing views on getting many of their members out of jail .
while this is going on , danny and his old drunkard buddie , ike ( ken stott , who played the chief inspector in danny boyle 's " shallow grave " ) , re - open an old gym which allows the two opposing religios sects , protestant and catholics , to work together .
danny not only begins teaching kids how to box , but has stayed in great shape whilst in prison , and is ready to start boxing real people again .
and danny runs into his ex - love , maggie (
" breaking the waves " 's emily watson ) , who has n't seen him since he went in .
they do n't easily start up their romance again because she 's the wife of a prisoner whom she married during danny 's tenure in prison , and also has a son , liam ( ciaran fitzgerald ) , from him , whom liam is hoping will get out soon .
but the two are slowly re - drawn to eachother again , and this begins to complicate things .
the political story is nothing really special but works in itself .
we 've seen it many a time before , but it 's at least interesting , sometimes emotional , and even riveting at times
.
there 's a big riot towards the middle of the film which is frightening in its brutality and honesty .
the boxing story is very minor to the story , but does represent people coming together to fight eachother fairly , and even with good sportsmanship .
there are only a few boxing scenes , but they 're never like " raging bull "
/let's - strip - down - the - sport - to - its - bones brilliant .
they 're more realistic , and instead of bone crunching , we hear the sound of the gloves hitting eachother , which is slightly unerving at times .
and i did n't know daniel day - lewis was in such good shape .
but the backbone of the story is the love one . because these characters are given such horrible circumstances , and since the two leads have such great chemistry together , we really feel for their plight .
as the film goes on , and circumstances get worse and worse , the characters have to make real human decisions , and we can sympathize with them as humans not characters .
this is how you write a love story - take note , hollywood .
these elements are pretty much equally balanced , with each of the parts of the stories working hand - in - hand with eachother .
i loved how each of the different parts of the plot mattered , and sometimes spilled over into the next .
it made sure that we did n't just care for one of them .
i 'm not saying they 're all equally great , because the love story really carries the film , but at least they all work out respectively .
the acting is amazing , with day - lewis and watson giving excellent performances and showing great chemistry .
i 'm not sure if they 're oscar - nominee bound , but
they 're very good .
in the supporting roles , billy cox is greatly sympathetic as the ira leader losing control of his daughter and his workers .
but the film is stolen acting wise by ken stott as ike , who is just a great scene stealer .
the direction and co - writing by jim sheridan ( with the other co - writing credit going to terry george ) is excellent , rounding out the characters well , but not pacing everything greatly .
i noticed that the first half was very leisurely ( yet fascinating ) , but the second half whirls by at a quick pace , and ends much too quickly .
more time could have been spent thinking up the ending , since it does seem quite sloppy .
though " the boxer " is a good film , it never achieves the greatness that it should .
sure , it 's a masterpiece compared to most of the hollywood drivel we usually get , but on it 's own , it just could have been better .
but it still works out , gives us a great love story combined with a political and boxing drama , and features great acting .
even if it could have been better , this'll do .
Example Output: P

Example Input: *
* * be warned . . .
the following review contains some harsh language
*
* * the blair witch project .
quite possibly the least scariest movie of all time .
if you want to see real terror on the big screen go back and watch any scene with jar jar binks in the phantom menace , because this movie is not scary or even remotely creepy .
my colleague and friend chuck dowling wrote that if less is more , then the blair witch filmmakers must have thought that nothing is more .
and this worked for him .
well , i 'm sorry , but nothing .
. . is nothing ! ! ! ! !
nothing is not more .
it 's nothiiiiiinggggggggggg ! ! ! ! ! ! .
i do not pay 5 dollars to see nothing .
" nothing " is free , available all around the world at a location near you .
i am absolutely in amazement that some people find this movie scary .
i could just discount them and say , " well , i guess they are just pansy
chicken shits who are probably scared of their own shadow .
"
but i have intelligent friends who like this movie
and so that does n't hold water .
there must be some other reason .
( then again , maybe my first thought is correct , i think i 'll try pointing their shadow out to them one day and test their reaction . )
when i hear people praising this film , i never hear them talking about what makes up about 97 % of this movie : three kids bickering with each other about being lost .
they only talk about what might make up possibly 3 to 4 minutes of screen time .
this being a few very short night scenes where the kids hear some unscary sounds and another where they shout " josh ! !
" over and over .
this film should not be called the blair witch project , it should more accurately be called three dumb and pisspoor filmmakers get lost . . . and argue with each other .
oh ladies and gentlemen you will be so scared when you hear them shouting " josh ! !
"
.
and if you thought that was scary , wait till you see a pile of rocks , and then some tinkertoy lincoln logs ,
oh my dear lord you will be pissing in your pants with fear .
oh yeah , and some goo on one of their backpacks .
you 've never seen terror like this folks , and you do n't want to .
the chevy chase / goldie hawn comedy foul play is creepier than this film .
( for current films , i highly recommend the sixth sense or a stir of echoes for a creepy filmgoing experience . )
this film is an example of marketing with no substance .
the marketing was brilliant , and the whole nation is in awe of just the premise for the film .
they want this film to be good .
and i think they are reaching and praising the wrong movie because they do n't have anything else to praise .
that wonderful film that rejuvenates the horror genre may come along , but this is not it .
this film could have been so much better .
just think , if maybe there had been only 10 minutes of arguing about being lost , and 80 minutes of nighttime stuff .
i saw this movie with a girl who was extremely pumped for it .
she was sold on this film .
and then , at one point during it , she turned to me and asked ' . . .
are we supposed to be scared by this ? ' .
i 've heard one opinion that you " have to use your imagination " to create the fear in this movie .
well , i thought that was what the filmmakers were supposed to do .
use their imagination and create a good movie .
i mean anyone can use their imagination and not pay 5 bucks for it .
but even if you like this idea , then what are you imagining ?
an entity called the blair witch ?
some rednecks fucking with these kids ? are either of these things really scary when you think about it ? ? ?
i 've heard several people say that this movie makes them recall how scary it can be to be out in the woods and hear something .
well sure that s scary in real life , but there are a lot of things that are scary in real life that are not scary in a movie nor even interesting .
you could sit in your house and see a snake or a spider and it could be scary , but in a film it would n't be .
and no , a movie does not need a big budget or cgi special effects to be scary or creepy .
actually the less the better ( see the equally awful remake of the haunting ) .
but you have to do something .
you ca nt just count on us all having nostalgic memories of how something like this could be scary , if it were real .
and by the way , about the shakycam filming in blair witch .
are n't these supposed to be " filmmakers " who should know how to point a camera and shoot something without shaking the camera constantly ?
i 'm not even talking about the couple scenes where they are terrified , that 's justified .
i 'm talking about the other 87 minutes of the movie where they ca n't seem to shoot anything smoothly at all .
minor quibble there .
there is a feeling in me that the people that like this movie are suckers .
that the filmmakers are just laughing their asses off all the way to the bank .
and i think there is a good chance they will see this film again and say to themselves " what was i thinking ? ?
" .
but , if they do n't , then that s fine .
if it works for them then that 's okay
i guess .
i just lament that by making this movie a hit , we are going to be subjected to more of the " nothing is more " approach .
pretty soon we 're going to get some movies like this : just a still shot of a prison jail cell .
for 90 minutes .
and we 'll have to use our imagination and think to ourselves , " my god
, would n't it be scary to spend life in prison ? ! !
this movie is the scariest movie of all time ! ! ! ! !
"
.
or , a shot of a coffin , with some funeral directors arguing with each other .
"
man , do you know how scary it would be to die ? ? ? ! ! ! !
now this is the scariest movie of all time ! ! ! !
" [ r ]
Example Output:
N