In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: threat and non-threat. Threat is a statement that someone will be hurt or harmed, especially if the person does not do something in particular.

Comment: Ms. Wente, you are an American if I'm not mistaken.  If you don't see the Trump presidency as a huge
tragedy you have no longer the right to write about just anything.  This is not something we can
be easy on.  This is the government of the most powerful nation in the world and it's President is more
a less an idiot who really mostly listens to Steve Bannon a devotee of many fascistic writers and thinkers.
He is not simply out of an American film myth.  Bannon is for real and I'm sure he has been looking for 
a Trump for some time to use as his, and the alt-right conspirators.  Even if Trump goes, what he leaves
behind in form of vice president and cabinet isn't much better.  Bannon may be the past, but the rest
would stay.  And can the US really afford four years under Pence even.
Non-threat

Comment: Kill  them if we must or kill them because we can. Big difference. When a bear is charging, do you shoot them. When he is biting your leg, do you shoot then? When the bear is smacking the eye balls out of your head, do you shoot them then? I can tell you from first hand experience many times over, you better shoot when he is charging and hope you kill him before he kills you outright with one swat or sends you to the hospital.
Threat

Comment: Good Morning Gary. My comment did not have anything to do with you personally, it honestly reflected a large percentage of the left who use violence and intimidation towards those they disagree with. The letter I was commenting on had to do with the cost incurred by the local government due to  needed police protection. So it boils down to one question, who were the police concerned about turning violent? I had friends there, and the attitude of the anti-Trump folks was and is intolerant, violent and completely anti free speech. We in this Nation do not see, at least not nearly to the extent we see it from the left, an attitude of the only people allowed to speak freely or assembly peacefully is those they agree with. Would you care to try and dispute this simple fact? Please, right here, my life is way to busy to just take time to meet for coffee.

Non-threat