In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

Example Input: Sentence: Paul tried to call George on the phone, but he wasn't available.
 Reason: The 'he' refers to george because Paul not being available makes no sense. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Example Output: Correct

Example Input: Sentence: I couldn't put the pot on the shelf because it was too tall.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the pot because as we're all aware of by now, the pot is a big issue in this game. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Example Output: Wrong

Example Input: Sentence: We went to the lake, because a shark had been seen at the ocean beach, so it was a dangerous place to swim.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the ocean beach because there are sharks in the area. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Example Output:
Correct