In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: threat and non-threat. Threat is a statement that someone will be hurt or harmed, especially if the person does not do something in particular.
--------
Question: Comment: Yes all those deplorable or Bernies basement dwellers!!
 It was an epic fail. I've seen some media fails but MSNBC had the worst night for news likely in the last 50 years. 
That was just painful to watch. Ratings were probably just awesome and that's the one time they probably wished the ratings had been awful. 

What an absolute  embarrassment !!

Answer: Non-threat


Question: Comment: I find those who chant do so because they either have such a slim argument that they don't want to be drawn into it, or because they lack the mental prowess to mount their argument in a rational manner.  It is for that reason that the "Lock her up," chant is offensive.  

I should point out too that the main perpetrators of the chanting phenomenon are unionists, "Hey, Hey  Ho, Ho.  Fill-in-the-blank has got to go!"   Clever eh?   The "progressives" particularly the enviro-nuts, are no better,  “U.G.L.Y.  Corporate scum you cheat you lie.  You UGLY, uh, uh, you UGLY.”   That intellectual gem and many others are found on the website tarsandsblockade.org

Chanting has no place in rational debate, none.

Answer: Non-threat


Question: Comment: I wish I spoke for all white people when I say this is embarrassing. #whitefragilitycankissmyass is right. It disgusts me that a courageous leader speaking out against the most powerful groups for what is right gets stronger disapproval from the university than the dentistry students discussing who they'd rather 'hatefuck'

Answer:
Non-threat