In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: threat and non-threat. Threat is a statement that someone will be hurt or harmed, especially if the person does not do something in particular.

[EX Q]: Comment: I hate Trump and I will say and do anything to destroy him.
I am a liberal and work for the MSM and have the power to publish Trump hate propaganda and fake news everyday 364 days a year except on Christmas.  Trump has to go. Hillary can make a comeback and nothing can stop her from crawling back out from the swamp.
[EX A]: Threat

[EX Q]: Comment: Kill  them if we must or kill them because we can. Big difference. When a bear is charging, do you shoot them. When he is biting your leg, do you shoot then? When the bear is smacking the eye balls out of your head, do you shoot them then? I can tell you from first hand experience many times over, you better shoot when he is charging and hope you kill him before he kills you outright with one swat or sends you to the hospital.
[EX A]: Threat

[EX Q]: Comment: 4) Every US intelligence agency has concluded that Russia made an attempt to influence the outcome of the election...even to the point of trying to target states.
5) Trump's refusal to accept #4.
6) Numerous Trump personnel forgetting that they met with Russian officials....or flat out lying about the meetings.  Heck...junior changed his story 3 times just about this one meeting.

In other words, maybe there isn't some grand collusion effort....but they have given plenty of people plenty of reasons to think it's possible....and is worth investigating.

Bottom line.....you're incredibly naive if you think a hostile foreign entity is willing to provide such information about a candidate without getting something in return....and you're incredibly foolish to think that this is OK.

BTW--I voted for Gary Johnson, so, I'd avoid telling me the evils of HRC in order to excuse Trump.
[EX A]:
Non-threat