We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

Example Input: You argue that people cannot be trusted with guns, because they might injure themselves in accidents (hence the 4.46 figure).
Example Output: Valid

Example Input: The Second Amendment isn't a gun control law, it's an individual right, independent from militia service.
Example Output: Valid

Example Input: Unarmed law-abiding citizens are victims of gun crimes because criminals do not obey the gun ban in that gun free zone.
Example Output:
Valid