In this task, you're given a statement, and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence clearly disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3' corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.

Statement: In addition, these central groups were able to achieve some efficiencies and increase consistency in the implementation of the organization's security program by performing tasks centrally that might otherwise be performed by multiple individual business units. Choices:  1. They were unable to achieve efficiencies. 2. The central groups were able to achieve efficiencies. 3. Consistency was increased.
1

Statement: Accidentally, it is believed. Choices:  1. Not on purpose, they all believe. 2. Intentionally, it is thought. 3. By mistake, it is thought.
2

Statement: Nominee-stoning is what the two-party system and separation of powers are for. Choices:  1. The two-party system and separation of powers does not enable or allow nominee-stoning. 2. The two-party system and separation of powers are for nominee-stoning. 3. Everyone in the two-party system gathers stones to pelt the nominee.

1