We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Example Input: Sent1: If someone is bad enough to be considered for the death penalty then they must have had sure evidence that they are guilty if they are then they shouldn't deserve the right to live among people they could kill
 Sent2: When they are about to be shot just think what would be happening, some unlucky person would be dealing with the fact that they were going to have to take someone's life.
Example Output: Not similar

Example Input: Sent1: If they know they'll die if caught, they'll likely kill more rape victims and children.
 Sent2: >>>If we are sure they raped & killed those innocent children then we should let them die.
Example Output: Not similar

Example Input: Sent1: People generally think that the death penalty is worse than life without parole (certainly most criminals seem to think so).
 Sent2: Most people who would be deterred already seem to be deterred by life without parole as a punishment.
Example Output:
Not similar