In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: insult and non-insult. Insult is any lanugage or act that is disrespectful or scornfully abusive.

Q: Comment: Good point, any theocratic philosophy is a threat to constitutional democracy. Canada had a  blasphemy law. 

Violent theocrats are much worse - regardless of their religion. 

I only meant to say that The Premier was probably referring to violent Muslim theocrats which is essentially what an Islamist is. But the term is too close to Islamic and ends up stereotyping the religion. 

Given that the Ottoman empire ended just 100 years ago,  the link to religious rule is more recent in Islam. About the same time the Federal Reserve was created in America and they are still fighting about that!

A: Non-insult
****
Q: Comment: Maybe.  I suspect it has more to do with leaving that attraction behind rather than obsessing over it like the homosexual activists do.  Many with SSA are married with kids living happy lives, reluctant to acknowledge that they have/had SSA.  If I agree with Martin at all, it's that we should be more comfortable talking about people with SSA - as opposed to "LGBT" or "gays" or "lesbians" - so that those who have that compulsion or who overcame it would feel more comfortable talking about it.

A: Non-insult
****
Q: Comment: Michael, you are simply disgusting.

A:
Insult
****