Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.

[Q]: This doctor sounds like a legit man with a "World View" attitude toward varying political climates. His use of opiates is actually quite sound, and opiates are the most relied on pain management method for thousands of years-simple fact. The other thing is plainly clear-the US govt has attacked the ability of Drs. and clinics to effectively treat pain, without fear of "doing the wrong thing" as one doctor specifically described it to me.  If a guy gets a minor injury the doctors are scared to even hand out 3 low strength painkillers. I am not quite sure the motivation here because I think it would benefit the US govt far more for having the masses addicted as can be. Lining their own pockets thru medical service/product in the USA anyway....but the doc is still ON POINT with his approach-this STINKS of a witch hunt.
[A]: No


[Q]: SIGN the PETITION@

protectthepfd.com
[A]: No


[Q]: I am hardly a Trump supporter.  I will always attempt to keep your posts honest as the facts when you are overcome by hyperbole or your emotions, however.  

I don't have to agree with anything anyone says; I just have to vote against the worst of two seriously flawed candidates.  

I am concerned about Hillary (and Bill)  as a serial war monger, serial liar, serial misogynist (against Bill's women) and lack of ethics regarding the source of money for the Clinton Foundation as well as her cozy relationship with the 1% who are funding her campaign.   Her morals in pursuit of the office are virtually non-existent.  

Trump may well be the lesser of two evils this year.  

Income distribution is not my hot button; throwing away lives in the Middle East for no possible gain is.
[A]:
Yes