The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.
--------
Question: Context: 'Like i said food is my top priority so i will not do well with less than 2.' 'Then you get two food and no firewood here.😮' 'You mean you can't let up one firewood for me?'
Utterance: 'Not this time, I really need all the firewood and food is a large need for my family of 8. We need the firewood to cook all our meals from the animals we hunt since we are short on food.'

Answer: Yes


Question: Context: 'Okay, I need firewood to stay warm and cook food. I'm willing to give up some water for more firewood.' 'Unfortunately i need the firewood. My body has trouble maintaining heat. I need as much as i can get ☹️' 'Okay, well if you need water and firewood, that only leaves food. If you can part with extra food, here's what I'm proposing'
Utterance: 'Yes you can definitely have all the food. Maybe 2 firewoods and 2 waters for me?'

Answer: No


Question: Context: 'Can i have 2 firewood, 2 food and 1 water' 'That can work. That seems like a good solution to the problem.🙂' 'Ok I hope you are okay with that. Please confirm!'
Utterance: 'Okay, I will confirm that. Thanks! 🙂'

Answer:
No