TASK DEFINITION: In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine the neutral choice based on your inference from the statement and your commonsense knowledge. The neutral choice is a sentence that neither agrees nor disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3', corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence. If sentence X agrees with sentence Y, one's correctness follows from the other one. If sentence X disagrees with sentence Y, they can not be correct at the same time.
PROBLEM: Statement: In the case of H-2A workers, the reading would require the conclusion that Congress intended to provide H-2A workers with legal services representation on claims arising from their employment contracts only for the very brief periods that the workers are in the United States -- potentially rendering the promise of legal representation largely meaningless. Choices: 1. This reading would require the conclusion that Congress had intended for H-2A workers to only get legal representation when they were in the country. 2. This reading would require the conclusion that Congress had intended for H-2A workers to only get legal representation when they were outside of the country. 3. From a legal standpoint, most judges and legal scholars would agree that this is asking for chaos.

SOLUTION: 3

PROBLEM: Statement: These changes were also submitted to OMB for approval. Choices: 1. The OMB can approve these changes. 2. These changes were so useless that they weren't mentioned anymore. 3. It takes some time to get these changes approved.

SOLUTION: 3

PROBLEM: Statement: Cooper was condemned, reviled and, for a brief time, incredibly popular. Choices: 1. Copper was very unpopular once.  2. Copper has always been popular.  3. For the longest time Copper were looked down upon.

SOLUTION:
1