In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

[Q]: Comment: That is 100 % an impossibility. If you are pro life and vote and support candidates and a party that advocates full term and late term abortion at will then you cannot under any circumstance be pro life.

You have to look at where the candidates stand. Hillary wants us to be required to provide and pay for abortions and abortive medicines. She stated flat out in the debate she supports full term partial birth murder. HOW can ANY Catholic support her. Then there are the e - mails where she, through her campaign, states how "backwards" we are and advocates groups to sping to action when they can incite a "Catholic Spring." SHE will use law and the courts to mandate the marrying of homosexuals and the providing of abortion procedures. No Catholic can vote for her.
[A]: Non-sexual-explicit


[Q]: Comment: HIS small white penis is showing
[A]: Sexual-explicit


[Q]: Comment: No, it is not unfounded. The man promised to deport 11 million people, to set up a registry for people based on their religion... I can't remember what else, for me that is more than enough.

If he follows through on his promises, America as we know it will cease to exist. That fear is only unfounded if we do not believe him.
[A]:
Non-sexual-explicit