Categorize the comment on the basis of toxicity. If the comment is toxic (harmful, malicious, derogatory, threat, insult, identity attck, etc.) output Yes, otherwise output No.

[Q]: Boozer Schmidt: I suppose this would all have been much easier if the district had just brought you in to let them know who was deserving of their right to an education.  You seem to have this all figured out, so I'm guessing you have some background in childhood development, education, or have studied the long-term outcomes for special education.   I would definitely be interested in reading your research.

Or maybe you're just an idiot.  I suppose that's possible too.
[A]: Yes


[Q]: Thank you, was hoping someone would fill in the blanks here.
[A]: No


[Q]: In many past civilizations the LBGT communities were an important part of the social structure. The South Pacific Islanders acknowledged their transgender males as they dressed as females and stayed in close family groups helping to raise the next generation. Unlike our "modern" times, the past often embraced everyone as "needed" to survive into the future. We could use a lot more of that but our religious and political leaders want us dependent on them instead of each other. Most of us got along well with each other in the "old" days of Alaska because we did need each other to survive.
[A]:
No