In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

[EX Q]: Comment: Mr. Value has a long history of domestic violence himself. His daughter seems like she puts out what she gets back. No victory was done by the father.

In fact, reading social media's of the family involved, a war just got started. Enjoy the "Laws" be damned sentiment if you are in the middle of one of their battlesurroundings or driving home or while at the mall shopping.
[EX A]: Non-sexual-explicit

[EX Q]: Comment: I am sure Bush was sexually aroused by touching her.  After all, he was only 90 at the time.  He most likely wanted to grab her by the boobs, but he couldn't stand to do that so he did the next best thing and grabbed her by the butt.  Dirty old man.
[EX A]: Sexual-explicit

[EX Q]: Comment: So you will boo for this but not a damn word when pro athletes are charged with rape, assault and other crimes? I don't understand how you are so quick to turn your back over the pledge but not a damn thing about all the pro athletes doing drugs, sexually assaulting girlfriends and wives and committing serious crimes when they are role models for our children. What kind of message is that? Imagine if the stands were empty because a player beat up his baby momma again or got arrested for DWI. Imagine the message that would send to our youth. I am a firm believer in the pledge & respecting our country. Look at the role models we have for our children. We pay billions for athletes and musicians but we don't have money for schools or medical care. And we wonder how things got so bad.
[EX A]:
Sexual-explicit