You are given two sentences. You have to find if there is entailment or agreement of the Hypothesis by the Premise. From the given pair of sentences, you should identify if there is enough information in the Premise to support the claim made in the Hypothesis. The Premise may not exactly be the same as Hypothesis. Your task is to return 'entails' if the premise supports hypothesis else return 'neutral'.

[EX Q]: Premise: Ocean acidification (OA) is the process by which anthropogenically derived atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) is absorbed into surface seawater, lowering the pH and concentration of carbonate ions in the global ocean (Caldeira and Wickett 2003 ; Doney et al. 2009 ). 
 Hypothesis: Ocean acidification occurs when excess carbon dioxide in the atmosphere causes the oceans to become acidic.
[EX A]: entails

[EX Q]: Premise: Within the past 200 years or so, increased amounts of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases have been released into the atmosphere due to human activity. 
 Hypothesis: The composition of the atmosphere has changed over the last 200 years primarily due to human activity.
[EX A]: entails

[EX Q]: Premise: The World Bank claims that the projects will irrigate about two million hectares, help feed as many as 20 million people, provide drinking water for at least 30 million people, supply electric power for agriculture and industry, generate employment for about one million people and control floods. 
 Hypothesis: At least 20 percent of the world’s people do not have a ready supply of clean drinking water.
[EX A]:
neutral