In this task, you will be presented with a context from an academic paper and a question separated with a 
. You have to answer the question based on the context.

[Q]: We observe interesting hidden correlation in data. Fig. FIGREF24 has Topic 2 as selected topic. Topic 2 contains top-4 co-occurring keywords "vegan", "yoga", "job", "every_woman" having the highest term frequency. We can infer different things from the topic that "women usually practice yoga more than men", "women teach yoga and take it as a job", "Yogi follow vegan diet". We would say there are noticeable correlation in data i.e. `Yoga-Veganism', `Women-Yoga'. Women-Yoga 
 Question: What other interesting correlations are observed?
[A]: Women-Yoga


[Q]: We evaluate our method on three tagging tasks: POS tagging (Pos), morphological tagging (Morph) and supertagging (Stag). We select these tasks as examples for tagging applications because they differ strongly in tag set sizes. The test results for the three tasks are shown in Table TABREF17 in three groups. The first group of seven columns are the results for Pos, where both LSTM and CNN have three variations of input features: word only ( INLINEFORM0 ), character only ( INLINEFORM1 ) and both ( INLINEFORM2 ). For Morph and Stag, we only use the INLINEFORM3 setting for both LSTM and CNN. 
 Question: Do they jointly tackle multiple tagging problems?
[A]: No


[Q]: For a word belonging to any one of the word-groups representing these concepts, the modified cost term favors an increase for the value of this word's embedding vector dimension corresponding to the concept that the particular word belongs to.  
 Question: Along which dimension do the semantically related words take larger values?
[A]:
dimension corresponding to the concept that the particular word belongs to