Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.

Example Input: Glad you asked. Put all of the State of Alaska's revenue into the Permanent Fund which would raise the fund to around $70 billion. Then pay the state 4% of the fund balance every year to be used for their operating and capital expenses. In years when the fund produces more than 6% in earnings, pay the excess earnings out to the public in the form of a dividend. Under the plan, this year the State would get approximately $2.8 billion. Of course that is short of what they want but it is sustainable into perpetuity. Continuing to build to the Permanent Fund is the Future of Alaska. We accept pain now, for the benefit of a brighter future!
Example Output: No

Example Input: It's been my observation that our Air-Force pilots aren't arrogant, thinking that ground-support is beneath them, but rather, that it is a lot more dangerous than air-to-air combat.  And the infantry holds the A-10, and its pilots in high esteem.  15's, 16's, Tornado's, all were too vulnerable below 10k.  A-10s were so low and slow, they could give the enemy a haircut, and come home with holes in the wings big enough to almost drive a compact car through.  most important though, was that the A-10 pilots were able to fly low and close enough, to see who was enemy, and who was friendly.
Example Output: Yes

Example Input: Donkel, your sniveling and begging are getting tiresome. Are you even IN Alaska right now? How about letting us Alaskans mind our own business?
Example Output:
Yes