We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Sent1: Many people who support the death penalty are not willing to admit that vengeance plays a role - probably because they would be uncomfortable admiting that.
 Sent2: If they are uncomfortable admitting that vengeance is the underlying reason, then perhaps they should re-think their stance on the death penalty.
Similar

Sent1: The death penalty has been found to be a more effective deterrent to crimes against children.
 Sent2: The thing is, without the death penalty there is absolutely no deterrent from committing heinous crimes.
Similar

Sent1: If you are going to argue for or against the death penalty, at least try to be a credit to the argument and present something that makes sense.
 Sent2: You could just as easily argue that he was unjustly put to death and therefore it is a statement against the death penalty.

Not similar