In this task, you are given the abstract of a research paper. Your task is to generate a summary of this abstract. Your summary should not be very short, but it's better if it's not more than 30 words.
--------
Question: This paper presents a new Graph Neural Network (GNN) type using feature-wise linear modulation (FiLM). Many standard GNN variants propagate information along the edges of a graph by computing ``messages'' based only on the representation of the source of each edge. In GNN-FiLM, the representation of the target node of an edge is additionally used to compute a transformation that can be applied to all incoming messages, allowing feature-wise modulation of the passed information.

 Results of experiments comparing different GNN architectures on three tasks from the literature are presented, based on re-implementations of baseline methods. Hyperparameters for all methods were found using extensive search, yielding somewhat surprising results: differences between baseline models are smaller than reported in the literature. Nonetheless, GNN-FiLM outperforms baseline methods on a regression task on molecular graphs and performs competitively on other tasks.


Answer: new GNN formalism + extensive experiments; showing differences between GGNN/GCN/GAT are smaller than thought


Question: Understanding the groundbreaking performance of Deep Neural Networks is one
 of the greatest challenges to the scientific community today. In this work, we
 introduce an information theoretic viewpoint on the behavior of deep networks
 optimization processes and their generalization abilities. By studying the Information
 Plane, the plane of the mutual information between the input variable and
 the desired label, for each hidden layer. Specifically, we show that the training of
 the network is characterized by a rapid increase in the mutual information (MI)
 between the layers and the target label, followed by a longer decrease in the MI
 between the layers and the input variable. Further, we explicitly show that these
 two fundamental information-theoretic quantities correspond to the generalization
 error of the network, as a result of introducing a new generalization bound that is
 exponential in the representation compression. The analysis focuses on typical
 patterns of large-scale problems. For this purpose, we introduce a novel analytic
 bound on the mutual information between consecutive layers in the network.
 An important consequence of our analysis is a super-linear boost in training time
 with the number of non-degenerate hidden layers, demonstrating the computational
 benefit of the hidden layers.

Answer: Introduce an information theoretic viewpoint on the behavior of deep networks optimization processes and their generalization abilities


Question: Do GANS (Generative Adversarial Nets) actually learn the target distribution? The foundational paper of Goodfellow et al. (2014) suggested they do, if they were given sufficiently large deep nets, sample size, and computation time. A recent theoretical analysis in Arora et al. (2017) raised doubts whether the same holds when discriminator has bounded size. It showed that the training objective can approach its optimum value even if the generated distribution has very low support. In other words, the training objective is unable to prevent mode collapse. The current paper makes two contributions. (1) It proposes a novel test for estimating support size using the birthday paradox of discrete probability. Using this  evidence is presented that well-known GANs approaches do learn distributions of fairly low support.   (2) It theoretically studies encoder-decoder GANs architectures (e.g., BiGAN/ALI), which were proposed to learn more meaningful features via GANs, and consequently to also solve the mode-collapse issue. Our result shows that such encoder-decoder training objectives also cannot guarantee learning of the full distribution because they cannot prevent serious mode collapse. More seriously, they cannot prevent learning meaningless codes for data, contrary to usual intuition.

Answer:
We propose a support size estimator of GANs's learned distribution to show they indeed suffer from mode collapse, and we prove that encoder-decoder GANs do not avoid the issue as well.