Categorize the comment on the basis of severe toxicity. If the comment is severely toxic output Yes, otherwise output No.

[EX Q]: As 1 of those 125,000 Vietnamese settlers in the US, we were scattered around the country by random sponsorship and government design. Few communities were over-burdened and countless studies revealed no significant spikes due to early Vietnamese immigration in the 1970's. Personally, my family was shown the apartment, explained how to use heat and air (1 up and down control), appliances with few handles... Within, 30 minutes we functioned properly and our community of 70 families had no fire and killed no dogs, cats since. 1 time, local papers reported a story of Vietnamese catching wild ducks at the park and turtles at the ponds... Hurt and angry as well as having mastered enough English language in college, I pursued the journalists (2) to find out Vietnamese were not the only people taking wild ducks home from the park ( implied eating ) but others as well ( implied for pets only) and the pond authorities hired summer helps (2 Vietnamese HS kids) to manage overpopulation. That's it
[EX A]: No

[EX Q]: I did not realize marijuana was "a new thing". All these years I thought it was a plant. 

Hopefully we can make spice safer and keep the scary "new thing" in its cage.
[EX A]: No

[EX Q]: This is exactly the kind of pennywise and pound foolish thinking I was talking about: Looking only at the "costs" while ignoring the benefits. Trains are much more efficient at moving people than individual cars. What are the benefits of less congestion, less pollution, and providing transportation options for the elderly, disabled, students, low-income workers, etc etc? A responsible society needs to look at the big picture.
[EX A]:
Yes