In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

[Q]: Comment: Trolls should stay under the bridge.
Old tactic; if you can't refute the message - attack the messenger
[A]: Non-obscene


[Q]: Comment: The AG1000 are now made in China. It is the LAST thing I want here.

And no, it is not a FAST or even gen IV reactor. It still suffers the same issues as the other gen III plants and should be built.

Instead, we have nuscale that is about to do a factory here in America, and put the reactor in NW Utah. 
Thorcon isa GREAT concept that has a proven thorium design and yet these idiots in Congress and now Trump's admin ignore.
[A]: Non-obscene


[Q]: Comment: Cat:
Who appointed you protector of the average person or senior? I somehow missed that inauguration but I'm sure the attending crowd was a record number. 
I still have seen no evidence to show why these poor souls need to be protected from an investment approach that has proven to outperform and do so at a level of risk that is well below average since the time when stock markets first opened for trading. I've asked you to provide even a tidbit of evidence numerous times. Still waiting.
You have such strong opinions on this matter that one would think you have some supporting evidence?
SFI
[A]:
Non-obscene