The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the self-need strategy, otherwise output No. self-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to create a personal need for an item in the negotiation, such as by pointing out that the participant sweats a lot to show preference towards water packages.

Context: 'Hi, I am good. How about you? 🙂' 'same, can I get 3 food, 2 firewood and 0 water, I need 3 food because i need food to survive' 'That is actually close to perfect for me because I severely need water. Would you consider giving me 2 firewood instead of 1? '
Utterance: 'sure'
No

Context: 'You drive a hard bargain. I could really use that firewood. It's going to get cold tonight and these sleeping bags are not worth the price I paid ;)' 'Haha, I know but I am in the same situation! ☹️ and since I am getting less food I feel like it is fair I get on more firewood since I truly need that 🙂' 'Some extra water for coffee might keep us warm, would you consider taking 1 food, 2 wood, 1 water?'
Utterance: 'Sure I can do that 🙂'
No

Context: 'I enjoy camping as well. However, my campsite seems to be a bit chilly at night. I'd be willing to part with some firewood, yet I'd need quite a bit of food to compensate. I also have a stream nearby so water is plentiful if you need that as well.' 'I may be able to do something with regards to food. Do you have enough water?' 'I have more water than I need. How is your water supply?'
Utterance: 'I could use some more water as I get dehydrated easily. Since you have enough, I could give you and extra package of food for your water.'

Yes