In this task, you must classify if a given review is positive/negative, indicating your answer as P or N.

[Q]: when i first heard that romeo & juliet had been " updated " i shuddered .
i thought that yet another of shakespeare 's classics had been destroyed .
fortunately , i was wrong .
baz luhrman has directed an " in your face " , and visually stunning piece with this film .
it revolves around the two rival families , who in this version each run multi - million dollar enterprises .
these rival companies / families are the capulet 's and the montague 's .
the younger generation of these two families have formed gangs , who despise one another .
as the storylines goes , romeo montague ( played by leonardo dicaprio ) and juliet capulet ( claire danes ) meet at a fancy dress party , and it is love at first site .
i never believed love at first site was possible until i saw this film ,
the scene in which romeo 's eyes meet juliet 's through the fish tank
is one of the most memorable .
of course , they can not publicly reveal their love , for their families are arch enemies .
so they marry in secret
, this is where things begin to go wrong .
the story , as with all good shakespeare , ends in tragedy .
the cinematography is spectacular to say the least , and the soundtrack provides the perfect atmosphere in which to " lay our scene " , as the film says .
there is very little to criticise .
the performances are convincing , and several of the film 's younger stars may find that it provides a launch for their careers .
the modernisation of the script is ingenious and clever .
despite the well known storyline , this latest version still manages to cause tears among many members of the audience ( especially the younger generation ) , and this is certainly a great credit to the film .
[A]: P


[Q]: the word to describe sharon stone is " wonder " .
not that she _ is _ a wonder , but rather that
i wonder how she can be so inconsistent .
she has a dynamic screen presence in " basic instinct " , turns in a surprisingly fine acting job in " casino " , but possesses neither of those here .
stone teams up with private school headmaster 's wife isabelle adjani to kill adjani 's thoroughly unlikable husband ( chazz palminteri ) .
in a comedy of errors and unexpected twists
straight out of hitchcock ( as in ` homage to ' [ read " steal from " ] ) , it turns out that someone saw them or he 's not dead or maybe . . .
kathy bates turns in a credible , if unspectacular , performance as an investigative police detective .
her character is a bit dull but realistic , although her actions at the end are puzzling .
adjani is more than satisfactory as the timid beaten spouse driven to desperation .
it 's stone that is a disappointment among the actors .
how can she be the epitome of a femme fatale in previous films and come off as a blank in this one ?
costumed in skin - tight clothes and looking down her nose at everyone , she is someone you would want to avoid because she is boring , not enticingly dangerous .
even the threat ( or promise ? ) of a lesbian relationship between the conspirators is only half played out .
on the positive side , there are enough unexpected plot developments to keep your interest alive .
that is if you can put up with stone 's cardboard cut - out character and scenes directly lifted from hitch 's movies .
[A]: N


[Q]: at first glance , daylight would seem like your typical disaster movie .
on second glance it looks that way too .
although , as typical disaster movies go , daylight is n't that bad .
admittedly , it seems to rip off a great deal of its plot devices from disaster flicks of days gone by ( think poseidon adventure ) .
but the decent dialogue and surprisingly good acting make up for the " have n't i seen this scene somewhere before ?
" feeling that creeps up all too often during the film .
sylvester stallone stars as the recently fired head of new york 's emergency response team .
by sheer luck , he is in the right place at the right time when disaster strikes the unaware inhabitants of this little film .
"
what disaster is that ?
"
you ask , as you inch ever closer to the edge of your seat .
glad you asked .
through a whole sequence of entirely probable events ( about as probable as hitting the lottery ) a large explosion takes place in the lincoln tunnel running under the hudson river in new york city .
the explosion results in the tunnel collapsing at both ends , which causes not only massive loss of life , but traps a dozen people inside the wreckage of the tunnel .
good old sly , who is only feet away from entering the tunnel when it collapses , offers his services to the rescuers , who gladly accept it .
sly then enters the tunnel through a vent shaft ( think judge dredd ) which he can only go in , and not out off , and proceeds to try to rescue those trapped inside .
so begins the fun , but the fun has to be quick , because this tunnel has started to spring a leak .
the acting is about what you would expect of a stallone movie .
not superb by any means , but far above some of his other films
( think judge dredd again ) .
daylight 's acting is probably average , or a little above , in terms of this sort of genre , starring this particular star .
amy brenneman is the only actor of any note , and she does a pretty good job as stallone 's reluctant helper .
oh yeah ,
stallone 's real life son , sage , is in this too .
sage -- nice name .
i guess it could be worse , he could have been named nutmeg or parsley .
note to sage
-- you are still young .
go to school and get a good education -- you do n't have a future in acting .
the plot runs along the same lines as the acting -- interesting , but predictable .
mostly due to the fact that it was pretty well recycled from a dozen other action flicks .
the biggest problem with a film of this nature is that they try to cram too many things into the movie .
as soon as the cast clears one seemingly impossible hurdle , another one seems to pop right up , even worse than the last one .
i realize that it would n't be much of a movie otherwise , but it does make the movie a bit predictable .
adding to the predictability is the cast of characters , which of course , has to include at least one or two difficult people who want to do things their own way and think the qualified guy ( in this case stallone ) does n't know what he is doing .
why is it in disaster movies
we can never have everyone agree with each other and all work together ?
would this be too much to ask ?
ca n't we all just get along ?
special effects were n't bad -- but i 've certainly seen better .
some of the scenes , while fun to watch , were such blatant rip - offs that you had to wonder if scripts from old movies were just copied verbatim .
especially all of the scenes that involved anything underwater ( the tunnel , of course , starts to flood ) .
i really expected gene hackman , roddy mcdowell and ernest borgnine to appear at any minute -- i was n't sure if i was watching daylight or the poseidon adventure .
i suppose if you have to rip off a movie for good ideas , the poseidon adventure is a good one to use .
the underwater sequences ( aside from the deja vu ) were very well shot and worked fairly well
.
they were the best part of the movie by a long shot .
better than average stallone flick .
i realize that 's not saying much when the man has judge dredd on his resume .
but certainly not up to the standards of cliffhanger .
daylight is a fun movie , and as long as you are n't expecting a whole lot you might even be pleasantly surprised .
[A]:
P