In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: toxic and non-toxic. Toxicity is defiend as anything that is rude, disrespectful, or unreasonable that would make someone want to leave a converation.

[EX Q]: Comment: Donald ur a coward and you belong in the Cook Inlet with Billwaker on a piece of plywood you worth less piece of shit
[EX A]: Toxic

[EX Q]: Comment: Stupid is as stupid does.  And the right is really stupid. You can't fix stupid. Here's your sign.
[EX A]: Toxic

[EX Q]: Comment: No.   I dismiss the notion that these studies, including the ones you linked are definitive.    They raise more questions and give no absolute answers.    In fact, I suggest that you read the articles you reference because it seems you haven't.    I quoted David Schmitt (above) with regard to his comments on the "Google Manifesto".   In his comments he clearly states that:  ""But it is not clear to me how such sex differences are relevant to the Google workplace..." "the size of these negative emotion sex differences is not very large.. ..accounting for less than 10% of the variance".

Further the link to Schmitt's article above just is just the abstract.   But even that raises more questions.  For example:   he states:  "Empirically, sex differences in most psychological traits—in personality, sexuality, attitudes, emotions, behaviors, and cognitive abilities—are conspicuously larger in cultures with more egalitarian sex role socialization and greater sociopolitical gender equity."
[EX A]:
Non-toxic