In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: insult and non-insult. Insult is any lanugage or act that is disrespectful or scornfully abusive.

Input: Consider Input: Comment: Ross is a bully, just like his boss. 

He is engaging in a war of words in the hopes of convincing Canada and Mexico to give in quickly when negotiations start. Unfortunately for him he has tipped his hand. He does not just want a quick deal, he NEEDS a quick deal. 

The best thing we can do now is not agree to his timetable. No deal by the end of the year.

I personally do not see how we could get to a deal by the end of the year anyway. The terms Ross will offer us will likely be so oppressive that no Canadian politician could accept them without losing their seat and their party's standing in the next election. The same goes for Mexico. 

Negotiations will be protracted unless Ross caves, something he seems disinclined to do. I am not in favor of giving him the semblence of a deal as a face saving jesture. The guy is  jerk.

We had better get ready for a post NAFTA world, just in case.

Output: Insult


Input: Consider Input: Comment: If it wasn't for low class, some people would have no class at all.

Output: Non-insult


Input: Consider Input: Comment: It has been a bee in my bonnet since I found out about it in articles in the Post Outlook section and America Magazine just after the turn of the Millennium.  It has been in my book and on my blog post on morality ever since.

So, on the subject, what is your justification for priests avoiding procreative sex with their wives (which we have in the Catholic Church) besides the fact that in ancient times, they could not shower beforehand?  Was it or was it not the fact that congress with a woman rendered a priest impure for the sacrifice?  Be honest.  How can that not be the key question regarding whether sex itself in an impurity aside from procreation?  How is it not the whole tap root for the perversion of morality that comes out of Rome on these issues?

I must have misread the America on anathema, it was Rome that anathemized  non-continence.  Not a point in your favor.  

Pius condemned secret societies in QC, especially the Masons, who were the backbone of Italian nationalism.


Output: Non-insult