We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

Input: Consider Input: But guns aren't likely to do anything whatsoever, any more than cars are likely to drive or hammers are likely to strike.

Output: Valid


Input: Consider Input: Which gun right laws do you support?The right to ban them?you are as anti-gun as they come.Galileo no offense, because you make no pretense about it.

Output: Valid


Input: Consider Input: Lott claimes he lost a single footnote, ich showed that 98% of the time guns used definsivly only had to be brandished to be effective, which is in no way pivotal to his report.


Output: Valid