The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the no-need strategy, otherwise output No. no-need is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used when a participant points out that they do not need an item based on personal context such as suggesting that they have ample water to spare. no-need can directly benefit the opponent since it implies that the item is up for grabs.

[Q]: Context: 'Yes definitely!  I am pretty easy to work with and would like a deal that will help us both out as much as possible.' ' The item I need the most is water because I need to hydrate to stay strong and achieve my goals. And you?' 'I would say water as well because I am very active and build up thirst as a result.  However, I would be willing to compromise on things to allow you to have more water.'
Utterance: 'The item that I need the least is firewood because I will dedicate myself to look it up at the camp. And you?'
[A]: Yes


[Q]: Context: 'Yes pretty much that sounds like we can work something out' 'Would you be willing to let me have all the firewood and you could take 2 of the food and 2 of the water?' 'No I can't do that unfortunately./'
Utterance: 'Ok, so I could take 2 firewood, 1 food, and 1 water, the original deal, do you still want to do that one?'
[A]: No


[Q]: Context: 'Same here. I'll go ahead and list some of what I need and you let me know if you will need the same as well. I need some extra water for our camping trip as well as some additional food. ' 'That sounds reasonable. I don't particularly need the food because I see that as more of a luxury but I could really use some more water. It's supposed to get really really hot on the weekend. 😮' 'I hear that. What do you think of if I take 3 of the food supplies and you can have two waters? '
Utterance: 'That sounds like a fair compromise. I can get food by hunting animals, old school style. That would give you 4 total items. In that case it's only fair if I take all 3 of the firewood. 4 for me and 4 for you sounds like a good deal to me. 🙂'
[A]:
Yes