We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Q: Sent1: As far as the deterrent argument, I have said this before, and I will say it again: There is no accurate way to measure if the death penalty is deterring crime or not.
 Sent2: I am pro-death penalty even though I conceed that every study I have seen suggests it does absolutely nothing to deter capitol crimes.

A: Similar
****
Q: Sent1: First, we must choose to use executions because they may save innocent life.
 Sent2: There should no be a death penalty, since by taking a human's life, we are not saving it.

A: Not similar
****
Q: Sent1: I am very conservative and I am opposed to abortion and the death penalty.
 Sent2: I have a lot of sympathy for ex-convicts, but I still favor the death penalty.

A:
Not similar
****