We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Q: The guy who is a boxer who is watching was not looking for the knockout.

A: Invalid
****
Q: To take an example: the tax-code contains numerous loopholes that allow unscrupulous folks to take advantage of it and keep money that many argue they should be paying into the system.

A: Invalid
****
Q: Bedau & Radelet, both opponents, "consistently presented incomplete and misleading accounts of the evidence."

A:
Invalid
****