The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.

Q: Context: 'How about if I give you 3 food for 3 waters, and then we split the firewood?' 'I do require at least one water, hiking is very physical demanding. Also there are 3 firewoods?' 'yes there are 3 firewoods.  Okay I understand about the water.  then how about 2 foods for 2 waters, and we somehow divide the three firewoods? 🙂'
Utterance: 'Could I possibly get 2 firewoods? Assuming Water is your high value item?'

A: No
****
Q: Context: 'Hey! I'd like some more firewood to keep my doggo warm. What do you need?' 'I need firewood as well. We have a large group consisting of mostly senior citizens, including my grandma, so we'd like the firewood to keep everyone warm.' 'I see. 😮 What are you least interested in?'
Utterance: 'We can make do without extra water. Can we trade two waters for an extra firewood package and an extra food package?'

A: No
****
Q: Context: 'I am going camping too.  May I ask where you are going canoe camping?' 'We are going to camp in Oregon.  We are looking forward to it.  The views and scenery should be gorgeous.  How about you?' 'I am going to the Allegheny mountains in Pennsylvania.  I'm going to be hiking a lot so I will need some extra food.  Let's balance out the food and water somehow....'
Utterance: 'Sounds good.  We will also be hiking a bunch and I have little kids who go through water and food like crazy.'

A:
Yes
****