In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

Example Input: Sentence: The path to the lake was blocked, so we couldn't use it .
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the path because The path is something you use to get to the lake, you're already on the path. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Example Output: Wrong

Example Input: Sentence: Susan knows all about Ann's personal problems because she is indiscreet.
 Reason: The 'she' refers to ann because Ann is the one with the personal problems making her more likely to be indiscreet. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Example Output: Correct

Example Input: Sentence: James asked Robert for a favor but he refused.
 Reason: The 'he' refers to robert because the favor was not answered. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Example Output:
Correct