In this task, you're given a statement, and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence clearly disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3' corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.

[Q]: Statement: It's no good arguing about how it was done. Choices:  1. There's no point in arguing about the logistics. 2. It'd be better for us to argue about how it was done. 3. Arguing is going to waste too much time and we need a solution right now.
[A]: 2


[Q]: Statement: This model has value but fails to meet the broader range of information needs of investors who want more forward-looking information and data that reflect a company's overall performance, risk profile, and expectations for future performance. Choices:  1. This model has no value because the range of information it offers is to broad to meet the needs of investors. 2. Information and data that looks forward is what investors want to see more of. 3. We don't see this model being particularly useful when assessing companies on the market.
[A]: 1


[Q]: Statement: Arraiolos wool rugs are colorful and rustic-looking Choices:  1. Arraiolos wool rugs have a long and colorful history. 2. There is no color in these Arraiolos wool rugs. 3. There is a certain rustic look to Arraiolos wool rugs.
[A]:
2