We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

Example Input: Would you really want a public with an armed force of unknown size, strength, mobilty, location, organizational structure and intention anywhere in your country?
Example Output: Valid

Example Input: A much higher gun ownership rate than other developed nations could explain this- that although crime occurs less frequently in the US crime is more likely to involve guns in the US so someone is more likely to die.
Example Output: Valid

Example Input: We didn't ban all guns, just most of them, because our farmers need them and our police need them.
Example Output:
Valid