Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.

[EX Q]: Clark has my vote. I've not been impressed with the direction that the Kitty Cabal has taken recently, eschewing sound management in favor of a progressive  moonbat agenda that simultaneously fails to confront the city manager and his developer pals. Mike Clark will be a welcome change from the status quo. The city has lost my trust and will need strong, experienced leadership to win it back if they expect me to ever vote for another tax levy - period.
[EX A]: No

[EX Q]: Muck, Dick Cheney and George W were oblivious to the expanding housing bubble. They were so surprised when it burst. Clinton initiated home loans to people who could not afford them, which fueled the housing boom. Bush-Cheney thought they were responsible for the booming economy. They spent huge money on crazy wars, expanded government (Patriot Act, Homeland Security,TSA) and could not see the corrupt housing loans causing the bubble. Worst presidency in our history. Worse than Obama's. Deficits definitely do matter.
[EX A]: Yes

[EX Q]: Pete Kelly is a low life. He gives politicians a bad name.
[EX A]:
Yes