In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

[EX Q]: Sentence: The large ball crashed right through the table because it was made of steel.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the large ball because A ball isn't going to crash through a table if it was the one made out of Styrofoam as oppose to the ball being the one. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
[EX A]: Wrong

[EX Q]: Sentence: I couldn't put the pot on the shelf because it was too tall.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the pot because He pot on the shelf because it was too high. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
[EX A]: Wrong

[EX Q]: Sentence: When Tommy dropped his ice cream, Timmy giggled, so father gave him a stern look.
 Reason: The 'him' refers to timmy because the stern look would be to the one who giggled at Tommys misfortune. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
[EX A]:
Correct