In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Ex Input:
Comment: What the heck are you even talking about. The Constitution is the Supreme Court's job. To interpret it and uphold it, as written. Not come at it with some kind of activist perspective that Hillary thinks would be good policy. What was she right about?

Ex Output:
Non-sexual-explicit


Ex Input:
Comment: Now, here's a few problems with what you wrote.
You assume men have higher sex drives. They don't nor ever had, otherwise the pill wouldn't have made a difference, if men wanted it more and that's what gave women power over men then they'd still have that power. Somehow they don't. And yet it seems sex wasn't the power they held, weirdly enough we hear a lot about past "shotgun weddings", let me tell you something poor women worked, dad was liable to fund them until they married and yet there was were shotgun weddings concentrated.
And yet a lot of wedlock kids happened with kids who still saw their daddies and were directly supported by them but mom wanted nothing with dad. So it seems women were still fucking for the reason they always fucked, fucking itself. Women lined up the docks for the same reasons girls line up the sports block, to see hot men who are there to work not please them sexually.

Ex Output:
Sexual-explicit


Ex Input:
Comment: Fox News Now Serving Up Undiluted Vigilante Porn

Ex Output:

Sexual-explicit