Generate the answer for a given question. The question requires common knowledge of English. Make sure that the answer is in detail, long, consistent with the context, and requires general knowledge of English. To be less repetitive, please vary your language for each question. Give a proper explanation to answer, and if necessary, provide the definition of various terms. And conclude your answer if it's long. If you have used other resources (e.g., Merriam Webster's.) to answer the question, include citations in your answer. You don't need to paraphrase the context of your resources, but make sure that your answer is consistent and complete.

Input: Consider Input: I am just wondering about the difference between: in contrast to and in contrast with.

Output: In fact, they could be used interchangeably, however, 'in contrast with' is more common in UK English. Moreover, When we say 'contrast with', CONTRAST is behaving as a verb. Example: 'He likes to contrast his checkered jacket with plain pants' or 'his checkered jacket contrasts with his plain pants.' But when we say 'in contrast to', it is behaving as a noun. Example: 'His checkered jacket stands in contrast to his plain pants.' (As you can see, in this sentence 'stands' is the verb). (Testluv, GMAT Instructor, Beat the GMAT forum)


Input: Consider Input: Possible Duplicate: When is 'L' doubled? I'm confused about the two spellings. In which contexts do I have to use canceling or cancelling? Google returns 15.6 million results with canceling and 18 million with cancelling, so I don't know what is the good spelling. Why are both possible, and are there other such pairs?.

Output: There are many words that have different accepted spellings between British and American English. The wiktionary.org entry for 'cancelling' says: Alternative forms canceling (US English) This implies that a single 'l' is preferred in American English and a double 'l' in British English.


Input: Consider Input: Does this Bible verse have the same unfortunate double meaning in American English as it does in British English? The photo is taken from the 1984 translation of the (US) NIV. It looks as though the UK edition of the 1984 NIV had the same text; but in the 2011 update, the UK edition has ill in place of sick, while the US edition remains unchanged. I have visions of people bringing little pots of vomit...


Output: The referent is just elided here. You can read this as meaning 'sick [friends]' or 'sick [relatives].' The reason it sounds odd to British ears is that the current British colloquial usage of 'sick' as a euphemism for 'vomit' is overpowering any other interpretation for you. Since that colloquial usage is relatively unheard of in America, you are correct that the phrase sounds less odd to American ears. Perhaps that did influence the translation choices made by the NIV.