In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.
--------
Question: Comment: Sigh ... sadly evoking a some commenters here on the R-G site who define every new Donald Trump revelation as simply losers whining about the results of the last election, I have to say, as the feces continues to move into the fan with the power and consistency of a conveyor belt, that (damn) if ever there was an agenda this country needed, it was the politics of Bernie Sanders. Reform systems skewed for the wealthiest 1%, reform the worst health care system in the developed nations, reform the economics of higher education, and do what we can to halt the human damage to our planet. Hindsight and all that; and (damn) I didn't even vote for him in the primary.

Answer: Obscene


Question: Comment: The local GOPe are such losers. 
Giving up before preseason is no way to win the Super Bowl.

Answer: Non-obscene


Question: Comment: While I think it’s laudable that teachers are trying to include material that will resonate with students, abandoning the classics is shortsighted. We still hear frequent references to Shakespeare, The Lord of the Flies, and 1984 to name just a few; without knowledge of these works, folks are at a loss to put those references in perspective.

And allowing people to skip TKAM because it might make them “uncomfortable”? Hogwash. If literature doesn’t make you somewhat uncomfortable, you have either chosen the wrong book or you aren’t paying attention. It’s supposed to make you think, and, with any luck, challenge some of your beliefs.

Answer:
Non-obscene