In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine the neutral choice based on your inference from the statement and your commonsense knowledge. The neutral choice is a sentence that neither agrees nor disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3', corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence. If sentence X agrees with sentence Y, one's correctness follows from the other one. If sentence X disagrees with sentence Y, they can not be correct at the same time.

[EX Q]: Statement: If Clinton blinks the green light next summer, Washington would be in breach of the treaty by mid-2001, if it hopes to meet the 2005 deadline. Choices: 1. If Clinton agrees, Washington would be in breach of the treaty. 2. Clinton will give the green light. 3. Clinton has no impact on this outcome.
[EX A]: 2

[EX Q]: Statement: If two Internet users own the right software, they can talk by telephone over the Net. Choices: 1. It is impossible for Internet to talk using net. 2. Two Internet users can talk to each other for free using Net. 3. Two Internet users can communicate with each other using the Net.
[EX A]: 2

[EX Q]: Statement: But Royko also challenged white Chicago's prejudices, skewering bigots who tried to keep a white couple that had adopted a black baby out of their neighborhood or a funeral parlor that didn't want to bury a black soldier killed in Vietnam. Choices: 1. Royko challenged racial prejudice in Chicago, arguing for rights of families and soldiers. 2. Royko was a widely known bigot who harmed numerous black families throughout Chicago. 3. Royko's contributions and challenges to racism were pivitol in the civil rights movement.
[EX A]:
3