Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.

[EX Q]: Anyone else curious why todays Letters to the Editor is on commentary and not in the letters section?
[EX A]: No

[EX Q]: This mistake by Stewart goes to poor judgement and more attention to style than substance.  His speech made a valid point about helping people in appropriate ways where they live, but he just couldn't resist repeating the story about fires and disappearing pets (perhaps not even true).  I agree that Stewart is not qualified for any higher office, and possibly would not even be in the public eye if he were not part of one of the powerful families in the area.
[EX A]: No

[EX Q]: I didn't have look very hard to find a really life progressive liberal example. One can safely assume the progressive liberals posting support such behavior.

Terry Bean, is the top fund raiser and central key figure and party leader among the Oregon progressive democrats from the local to federal level. Bean is both gay and well known as a liberal activists. A Lane County Grand Jury indicted him for engaging sexual with a minor, supplying illegal drugs and sometimes secretly filmed gay porn in his home in which he used the profits from sales to fund campaigns for progressive liberals.
[EX A]:
Yes