In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: toxic and non-toxic. Toxicity is defiend as anything that is rude, disrespectful, or unreasonable that would make someone want to leave a converation.

[EX Q]: Comment: you are as ignorant as usual, its the PRICE you idiot, and electric is always much more costly to heat with
[EX A]: Toxic

[EX Q]: Comment: An idiot named Hillary happened
[EX A]: Toxic

[EX Q]: Comment: Serafim my friend:

I agree enthusiastically that "Assad should let free speech reign in Syria."  
Indeed, I would like to see free speech, including freedom of worship and self-expression, prevail, NORMATIVELY, throughout the MENA, from Iran through Saudi Arabia to Libya.  It would be  a wonderful experience for the Christian migrant workers in Qatar and Saudi Arabia, for the besieged Egyptian Copts and for Gay persons.  For that to happen, the region needs voices like that of South Africa's Archbishop Tutu: No political leader constrained Archbishop Tutu from speaking truth to secular power; thus, he helped to avert a civil war in South Africa and the concomitant generation of desperate refugees.
[EX A]:
Non-toxic