The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the vouch-fair strategy, otherwise output No. vouch-fair is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to call out fairness for personal benefit, either when acknowledging a fair deal or when the opponent offers a deal that benefits them. This can be through an explicit call out or can be implied.

[EX Q]: Context: 'I am severely malnourished and could use just one more food please' 'we got kids on this trip, they need food too.  also, your basic supplies should keep you fed well enough to not starve/be malnourished' 'I have kids as well who need food. I am just asking for one more food'
Utterance: 'we've given you all of the firewood, 2 of the waters'
[EX A]: No

[EX Q]: Context: 'I was going to say, the fire would be probably one of the few things I would be interested in! I love being warm.' 'Well you can take all the firewood if it will help, would it be ok if i get all the food in return?' 'That works for me. How would you like to divide the water?'
Utterance: 'I am ok with you taking two waters since you are new to camping, does that seem fair to you?'
[EX A]: Yes

[EX Q]: Context: 'I completely understand, thank you for compromising with water and food. Wished we had 4 firewoods to divide and share it equaly, may I ask how long will you be camping for? Im afraid I need 2 firewoods as well, maybe we can see who has the greater need? ' 'I am going to be camping for a couple of weeks, so I will need quite a bit. I also realized some additional water would be good, because I have some meals that need me to boil water. Maybe you can have 2 firewood in exchange for me having one of your waters? Then you would still have plenty of water, but also plenty of firewood 🙂' 'So sorry, I just realized you did not agree to the 3 waters in exchange of 3 foods. if you want a water, i will also will need one food. just to make things more fair on my end. If not i am looking at 2 waters, 0 foods, and 1 firewood. But i am willing to compromise for 3 waters, 1 firewood, and 0 foods. and you'll get 3 foods, 2 firewoods, and 0 waters, what do you think?'
Utterance: ' I appreciate your willingness to discuss this, so we both get a fair deal. I would really like if I get 3 food, 1 water, and 1 firewood. Then you would get 2 water and 2 firewood. You said that you really need water and food, so I think that would work best for both of us to get what we need most. What do you think? 🙂'
[EX A]:
Yes