We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

[EX Q]: I'm afraid that you're just going to have to accept that if you want to save the many, you may have to sacrifice the few.
[EX A]: Invalid

[EX Q]: That mood being TOTALLY wrong for him, I got him in private and asked if he had problems with me , or anything else going on at work.
[EX A]: Invalid

[EX Q]: Now as far as Scott Peterson goes if it was me I would fry him after 2 years of appeals because even though they only have circumstantial evidence against him it is overwhelming......
[EX A]:
Valid