We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

[EX Q]: Cornell is right when he suggests that an individual right theory was discussed, because that point was conceded and no one disputed that the black men who suffered under Cruikshank���s actions had an individual RKBA.
[EX A]: Valid

[EX Q]: Had James Holmes not been able to acquire this magazine his rifle would not have been disabled and he would have been free to change out empty magazines as often as he pleased.
[EX A]: Valid

[EX Q]: Gun free zones are areas where law-abiding citizens are forbidden to carry guns.
[EX A]:
Valid