In this task, you are given product reviews about dvds. The goal is to classify the review as "POS" if the overall sentiment of the review is positive(the reviewer is satisfied) or as "NEG" if the overall sentiment of the review is negative(the reviewer is not satisfied).

Q: Great cartoons, but some are not well restored . We bought this installment of the "Disney Treasures" series when it was released late in 2005.  My 9 year old son and I just watched these cartoons again (Oct. 2006) and we both love them.  I would have to agree, however, with those reviewers who have noted that visually the cartoons in this Vol. 2 of the "Chronological Donald" were not restored to the same degree of perfection as those in earlier releases, including Vol. 1 of the "Chronological Donald" and the release containing many Donald World War II cartoons entitled "On the Front Lines".  There is a clear difference in quality, which is apparent when the Donald cartoons previously released in "On the Front Lines" and repeated in this collection are compared to the cartoons that are new here.  The former are visually superior, not because they were better to begin with, but because they have been more carefully restored and transferred.  This is a shame.  One hopes that in Chronological Donald Vol 3 (apparently not to be released in 2006, but perhaps in 2007) there will be a return to the quality of Vol. 1 and "On the Front Lines."  One might even hope for a new, improved Vol. 2, but that is probably not in the cards

A: POS
****
Q: Convincing and thorough anti-war journalism . A revealing examination of the Iraq war, with substantial support from Intelligence and military sources.  It challenges the heretofore accepted accounts that bad intelligence led to the U.S.-led invasion to pre-empt Iraqi WMD deployment.  Chapters are - unfortunately - not provided.

A: POS
****
Q: Sorry, but I'm not falling for it . I don't know what Walmart these girls came from, but the ones I've been to only seem to staff homely, short, fat, goblin-like women. I smell a deception here. There's absolutely NO WAY IN H*LL that girls which look like this would have such a job. You'd find them working at espresso booths or something, where all the babes seem to be.   I think in this case PLayboy is appealing to our "fantasies" of seeing "regular girls from Walmart-type jobs" naked, but they couldn't possibly have found such quality at one of the actual stores.

A:
NEG
****