Categorize the comment on the basis of severe toxicity. If the comment is severely toxic output Yes, otherwise output No.

Example Input: You should always vote for who you like and who you think would do as you do. Trump wants to rebuild the economy and cutoff wasteful international tariffs that prevent American businesses from getting a foothold in the economy, as well as establish borders which all countries older than 100 years should have. Hillary wants to continue conflict in the middle east where thousands needlessly die and have their homes burnt to the ground by USA and it's partners, and tell you to shut up when she gets people killed or gets caught with her hand in the cookie jar. Not saying Trump wouldn't go to war but his priorities have middle east conflict on the backburner. As for as the wall I for one am tired of Juan and Pedro bringing cocaine across the Mexican border and lining their pockets with American dollars so yeah build the damn wall already.
Example Output: Yes

Example Input: WHY do they allow them to plea down? I was abused, he should hang by the neck until dead.
Example Output: Yes

Example Input: I read the article and here is the part I like......"The emerging answer is what Pickles calls “allowing users to control their own experience”, for example by using the mute button to screen out people they don’t like without that person knowing. Essentially it’s a way of allowing some tweeters to express divisive opinions without bothering others who won’t like it. One person’s right to free speech is matched by another’s right not to listen, as it might be at a party where you try to escape when trapped by the bore in the corner."...............Now that seems to me a much more favorable system than the one you are currently using. Give people a "mute" or "block button" that saves their preferences for who they don't want to see comments from. It can't get easier than that.
Example Output:
No