In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Comment: And, finally:
.
"We'd be in uncharted territory, that is unarguable."
.
What nonsense.
.
The vast majority of democracies world-wide use PR.  Are you really suggesting Canadians are too dumb to figure it out?
.
Or are you merely suggesting that it only works in countries where the populations once worshipped Odin, Thor, and Freya?
.
Bring on Bugs Bunny, Elmer Fudd, and the Wagnerian opera ...
Non-obscene

Comment: you overestimated the integrity of the electorates.

They repeatedly elected the provably  corrupt Liberals.
Non-obscene

Comment: You gotta marvel at how the bigots are attacking Merkel for dealing with the 2015 refugee crisis on Germany's border. What should she have done? Built a wall, like the one Germany tore down 20 years ago?

Of all the major nations in Europe, Germany is the only country that didn't contribute to last year's massive wave of refugees from the Middle East and North Africa. It was France, the UK and Italy that participated in the Libyan and Syrian civil wars, along with their good friends in Washington. Faced with huge numbers of refugees on their border, Germany had a choice: to let them in in an orderly fashion- recording ID papers and so forth- or have the refugees sneak anonymously into the country. The latter route being the path a potential terrorist would prefer to take, obviously.

Non-obscene