We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

Input: Consider Input: What you've been doing isn't a debate about gun control, it's criticism of the Supreme Court for saying the Second Amendment protects an individual right to own a gun for legal purposes.

Output: Valid


Input: Consider Input: It is true that nations such as Switzerland have just as many guns percapita, and Canada probably comes fairly close too, but their gun related deaths are many times lower than that of the US.

Output: Valid


Input: Consider Input: Despite the illustration of the article, I think you'll find virtually none of the burglars was carrying a gun, and if any householders were killed it is a tiny number.


Output: Valid