instruction:
Categorize the comment on the basis of severe toxicity. If the comment is severely toxic output Yes, otherwise output No.
question:
Ugly ass eyesore.....
answer:
Yes


question:
You're confused. Here's how it works: the government exists as long as that flow of money is headed in the right direction -  subsidies, land to graze cattle on, a $550k SBA loan. That government is different from the government that says "No." The government that is trying to prosecute - or is it persecute? - the Bundys has no authority, because Ammon Bundy and his dad say so.
answer:
No


question:
Wait, fer reals? That went to court?! And he WON?!? For the sake of every fuck. We finally made it criminal to tell the truth, and it started here. How sickening. I mean, I kinda get it, being socially shunned sucks, but not being able to inform your community about dangerous individuals sucks even worse. It would be one thing if the allegations were false, but if they're true ... well ... if you don't like the consequences maybe you shouldn't have done the deeds? I mean, I made the front page of my city's newspaper for being "different," on the heals of Columbine and on Mother's Day no less, and that was awkward as hell. It never even crossed my mind to accuse the newspaper of any misconduct. I was weird, apparently that was news, and they shared it. Well, fuck me then. 
How is Canada these days?
answer:

Yes