In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: threat and non-threat. Threat is a statement that someone will be hurt or harmed, especially if the person does not do something in particular.

Input: Consider Input: Comment: If a dude is actively threatening to kill someone, a head shot with a scoped .308 or .223 may be reasonable.  The same is not true of a dude sitting alone in his house.  In the latter case, there is no active threat.  We people instruct police to kill the dude anyway just to prove that they must do what we want when we want it.  Okay, if that is the kind of society we want, so be it.  Recall, that we really know nothing about what the dude did, but I guess the point is that we should kill him to teach others to do what police officers tell them regardless of the circumstance.  Okay, whatever.  We craft the society in our image and reap the benefit when citizens kill because we have taught them how little value life has.

Output: Threat


Input: Consider Input: Comment: "wrong side of history"? Too bad my grandparents are no longer living. I'd love to see you try to convince them that Roosevelt didn't save the US from the Depression and didn't lead the nation out of WWII. My old Finnish Grandma would likely wallop you with her umbrella.

Output: Threat


Input: Consider Input: Comment: It seems these climate conferences take place in fabulous tourist locales every 2 months, so the elites can jet in, burning the fossil fuels they hate.  Wake up and stop the hypocrisy!


Output: Non-threat