Given a passage, construct a question on the basis of the information present in the passage. Construct the question in such a way that (i) it is unambiguous, (ii) it is answerable from the passage, (iii) its answer is unique (iv) it answer uses text phrases from the passage. Avoid creating questions that (i) can't be answered correctly without actually understanding the passage and (ii) uses the same words or phrases given in the passage.

Input: Consider Input: Cognitive changes after ischemic stroke are often overlooked, particularly acutely and in patients with mild or transient deficits. We assessed patients with transient ischemic attack (TIA)/minor stroke with serial cognitive screening tests. We tested the hypothesis that mild acute deficits are transient and improve after TIA/minor stroke.', 'Patients with acute TIA/minor ischemic stroke, without a history of cognitive impairment, presenting with a National Institute of Health Stroke Scale score ≤3 were assessed <72 hours of onset. Patients were administered the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) at days 1, 7, 30, and 90. Cognitive impairment was defined as MoCA <26 and MMSE ≤26.', 'One hundred patients with a median (interquartile range) National Institute of Health Stroke Scale score of 1 (2) and median age of 68 (20) years were included. Baseline median MoCA score (26 [4]) was lower than the MMSE (29 [2]; P<0.0001). Cognitive impairment was detected in 54 of 100 patients (54%) with MoCA and 16 of 100 (16%; P=0.001) with MMSE. MoCA scores improved at day 7 (27 [5]), day 30 (28 [2]), and day 90 (28 [2]; P<0.0001). Resolution of cognitive deficits was because of resolution of recall deficits.

Output: Do serial montreal cognitive assessments demonstrate reversible cognitive impairment in patients with acute transient ischemic attack and minor stroke?


Input: Consider Input: Although evidence suggests that antiretroviral (ARV) regimens containing nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) are superior to single-protease inhibitor (PI)-based regimens at suppressing viral load, it is unclear how much of the improved viral suppression is due to intrinsic drug potency versus higher levels of adherence to simpler regimens. We therefore examined adherence and viral suppression in NNRTI and single-PI regimens in a cohort of largely ARV-experienced participants by using objective measures of adherence.', "Participants were recruited from the Research on Access to Care in the Homeless (REACH) Cohort and were included in the study if they were on single-PI-based or NNRTI-based highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) regimens for at least 3 months prior to study entry. Adherence was measured by unannounced pill counts at the participant's usual place of residence. The primary outcome was suppression of HIV viral RNA to <50 copies/mL.", 'Among 109 individuals who were followed for a median of 8.7 months, the odds of virologic suppression were approximately 8 times higher (p < .01) for participants on NNRTI-based regimens (n = 53) compared with those using single-PI-based regimens (n = 56) when controlling for adherence, as well as other potential confounders in a multivariable analysis. The only other independent predictors of viral suppression in multivariable modeling were ARV adherence (p < .01), CD4 nadir (p = .02), and continuous months on current regimen prior to the start of adherence monitoring (p < .01). There was no significant difference in adherence by unannounced pill counts in participants receiving NNRTI- versus single-PI-containing regimens.

Output: Are higher rates of viral suppression with nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors compared to single protease inhibitors explained by better adherence?


Input: Consider Input: Interleukin 22 (IL-22) plays an important role in the promotion of antimicrobial immunity. However, dysregulated IL-22 action leads to inflammation and is involved in autoimmune diseases, including systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). IL-22 binding protein (IL-22BP) is a soluble inhibitory IL-22 receptor and may represent a crucial regulator of IL-22. We investigated the expression and potential significance of serum and urinary IL-22BP levels in patients with SLE.', 'A total of 112 patients with SLE and healthy control subjects participated in our study. Patients were classified according to kidney involvement and disease activity based on clinical and laboratory measures such as urinary sediment, proteinuria, kidney function, complement factor 3 (C3), C4, anti-dsDNA, disease activity index, and renal SLE disease activity index. The concentrations of IL-22BP and IL-22 were measured by ELISA. The expression of IL-22BP in the renal tissue was detected by immunohistochemistry.', 'Patients with active renal disease had urinary levels of IL-22BP higher than (1) patients with active SLE but no renal involvement, (2) patients with a history of lupus nephritis in remission with no systemic disease activity and no history of renal involvement, and (3) control subjects. There was no difference in serum levels of IL-22BP among the groups. Urinary levels of IL-22BP in patients with active renal disease were positively correlated with SLE Disease Activity Index, Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics renal activity score, and histological activity index. IL-22BP was highly expressed in renal tissue of patients with active renal disease. After 6 months of treatment, urinary IL-22BP levels decreased significantly in patients with complete response, but remained unchanged in those with partial or no response.


Output: Do increased urinary interleukin 22 binding protein levels correlate with lupus nephritis activity?