We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.
--------
Question: Elections aren't supposed to be proof beyond reasonable doubt that the person on suited to the job, just the opinion of the electors.

Answer: Invalid


Question: If you are asking me how I an Pro-2A, but Anti-DP, then its because the right to bear arms serves a purpose.

Answer: Invalid


Question: Only psychopaths will deterrence not work because most people value their life over others first so the deterrence of the death penalty is inherent.

Answer:
Valid