Given a document, an entity and its sentiment towards the entity, verify if it is the correct sentiment towards the entity. Answer should be yes or no. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

Example Input: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Prager U is Positive . Popular conservative/libertarian channel  Prager U  is once again being censored by Google and YouTube for a video deemed too “hateful.”
The video is titled “Born to Hate Jews ” and while the title seems dark  the message is the exact opposite. The speaker this time around is Kasim Hafeez  founder of the Israel Campaign  and in the video  he  tells the story of  his  journey from being a Muslim who came very close to being a terrorist against Israel  to a man whose first hand education led  him  to stand with country  he  previously hated.
The core of  his  message is that  he  discovered that Israel is not the horrible  oppressive  and murderous state that many Muslim parents teach their children  and college professors teach their students.  He  uses the story to point out that education about  his  enemy turned  his  enemy into  his  friend.
“YouTube’s removal of PragerU’s video is particularly alarming. YouTube labeled the video as ‘hate speech ’ which is ironic since the video is about fighting hatred and anti-Semitism  and is presented by a Muslim ” said Prager U’s Communication Director Jared Sichel.
Google and YouTube have censored  Prager U  in the past as well  having placed some of their educational content in the “restricted” column  which would block videos from being seen in places like schools  where these videos would have the most impact.
While  Prager U’s  videos have not carried mainstream messages  and even covered topics from views that are not politically correct   they  have never been inflammatory  obscene  or hateful. That YouTube is labeling this video promoting peace  understanding  and factuality as “hate speech” raises questions that should be asked about what values lay at the heart of the company.
Example Output: yes

Example Input: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Eminem is Negative . Eminem  "Revival" (Interscope)
The A-List collaborators on  Eminem 's new album scream "I want a radio hit " with Beyonce  Ed Sheeran  Pink and Alicia Keys co-starring on the songs.
It wouldn't be hard to believe  especially since  Eminem 's last major hits have relied heavily on Rihanna  from "Love the Way You Lie" to "The Monster." But thankfully on " Revival " Eminem  returns as the star of  his  show.
Beyonce sounds beautiful on opener "Walk On Water " but Em's words are even better  as  he  delivers honest lyrics that sound  and feel  true to  him .
"Every album song I was spazzin' the (eff) out on/And now I'm gettin' clowned and frowned on "  he  raps.
 Eminem  is no longer hip-hop's most prized wordsmith and the adjustment is tough for any performer once known as one of music's most celebrated acts.
But on "Revival "  his  ninth studio album   Eminem  makes  himself  relevant with  his  smart rhymes  which is refreshing in the age of "mumble rap." The album artwork is of the American flag  with race and President Donald Trump recurring topics throughout the 19 tracks.
"So  hands in the air  let's hear it for the start of a brand new America without him  and be proud of where we're from " Eminem raps on "Like Home " featuring a stellar-sounding Keys.
Eminem co-produced some of the songs  also getting help from Rick Rubin  Dr. Dre  Alex Da Kid  Mr. Porter and Skylar Grey  the singer  songwriter and originator of "Love the Way You Lie."
Example Output: no

Example Input: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Waymo is Positive . SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) - Alphabet Inc âs Waymo  sought at least $1 billion in damages and a public apology from Uber Technologies Inc as conditions for settling  its  high-profile trade secret lawsuit against the ride-services company  sources familiar with the proposal told Reuters.
The Waymo self-driving car unit also asked that an independent monitor be appointed to ensure Uber does not use  Waymo  technology in the future  the sources said.
Uber rejected those terms as non-starters  said the sources  who were not authorized to publicly discuss settlement talks. The precise dollar amount requested by  Waymo  and the exact time the offer was made could not be learned.
 Waymoâs  tough negotiating stance  which has not been previously reported  reflects the company âs  confidence in  its  legal position after months of pretrial victories in a case which may help to determine who emerges in the forefront of the fast-growing field of self-driving cars.
The aggressive settlement demands also suggest that  Waymo  is not in a hurry to resolve the lawsuit  in part because of  its  value as a distraction for Uber leadership  said Elizabeth Rowe  a trade secret expert at the University of Florida Levin College of Law.
 Waymo  recently persuaded a San Francisco federal judge to delay a trial to decide the dispute from October to early December  citing the need to investigate evidence Uber had not disclosed earlier.
Amy Candido  a  Waymo  attorney  declined to comment on any settlement talks  but said the companyâs reasons for suing Uber are âpretty clear.â
â Waymo  had one goal: to stop Uber from using  its  trade secrets â  she  said. âThat remains  its  goal.â
 Waymo  sued Uber in February  claiming that former engineer Anthony Levandowski downloaded more than 14 000 confidential files before leaving to set up a self-driving truck company  called Otto  which Uber acquired soon after.
Uber denied using any of Waymoâs trade secrets.
FILE PHOTO: The  Waymo  logo is displayed during the company's unveil of a self-driving Chrysler Pacifica minivan during the North American International Auto Show in Detroit  Michigan  U.S.  January 8  2017. REUTERS/Brendan McDermid/File Photo
 Waymoâs  lawsuit has been disruptive for Uber. U.S. District Judge William Alsup granted  Waymoâs  request for a pretrial injunction in May  which prohibited Levandowski from working on Lidar  a key sensor technology for self-driving cars that is the crux of the current litigation.
Uber later fired Levandowski  regarded as a visionary in autonomous technology  after he refused to return Waymo documents at the heart of the case. Levandowski has asserted his constitutional right against self-incrimination and declined to answer questions from  Waymo  lawyers.
Benchmark cited  Waymo âs allegations of trade secret theft in separate litigation aimed at forcing Kalanick off Uberâs board. A Delaware judge put that lawsuit on hold and sent it to private arbitration.
On Sunday Oct. 1  the day before Kalanick was scheduled to give a deposition in the Waymo case  Kalanickâs lawyers called  Waymo  and asked to postpone the deposition  lawyers for both companies said in court last week.
Kalanickâs lawyers said he was in the middle of a fight to appoint new board members and was therefore too busy   Waymo  attorneys said in court.  Waymo  refused the request  forcing Kalanick to attend the deposition.
Example Output:
no