In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.
--------
Question: Comment: Rats jumping from a sinking ship.  Reminds me of retired general Harward declining the NSA job, calling it a crap sandwich.  Poor old HR McMaster, as an active duty general he couldn't say no the the CIC.  I'll bet he would have if he could have.

Answer: Obscene


Question: Comment: Your text: "...that he should shouldn’t criticize someone else’s position if he doesn’t know the proper word use. I stand by that statement, I am an asshole, and I don’t care if anyone likes or dislikes it. I don’t care if you call me “stewpid” my self worth isn’t based on a what on what you think. You are by your own admission, unable to spell, which does equate out to being unintelligent for someone for whose career was based on being able to spell."

Corrections:
You said "should shouldn't."  
Also "self worth" is a hyphenated word. You didn't hyphenate it.  
Also, "equate out to being"  should be written as "equate to being."  
What is "...based on a what on what you think."?

"...which does equate out to being unintelligent..." I've never heard anyone say equate "out." It's not proper use of the word. Leave the "out" out. 

Gosh, if I didn't know better, I'd think you were my ex-husband. I was very unintelligent when I married him. He also told me he was an asshole!

Enjoy life!

Answer: Obscene


Question: Comment: When you post total number of gun deaths without a break down of suicides homicides lawful shootings or police shootings one wonders what logical point you were attempting and while we are on the subject of logic nice use of false cause and false dilemma fallacies on the first post and a darn fine tu quoque on the second

Answer:
Obscene