In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.
--------
Question: Comment: Ironically, Walker's cuts will help deter smart people from moving up to help solve our problems.  We're already in a race for the bottom when it comes to talent.  I thought Walker was smarter than this.

Answer: Non-obscene


Question: Comment: Because a gunman murdered six Muslims at prayer. Or were you forgetting that?

Answer: Non-obscene


Question: Comment: First of all my opinion and opinion only is that this is good. It does appear that he has lack of recruiting skills because there are many good football players out in that area. Second, why would Martinez cancel the entire remainder of the season?  Second, auwe to that parent or parents that screwed up in argument.  Third, it's a shame that something could not be worked out so that the players would be able to play the rest of the season, I don't care if Kaiser used stand ins but IMHO the kids should have been allowed to play the rest of the season, regardless of the issues between Martinez and the parents.  A good leader teaches his players to resolve issues, and this guy ran at the first hint of trouble. Not good, just like Justin Mew is a crap principal.

Answer:
Obscene