We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Input: Consider Input: Sent1: How can you justify teaching a generation of children that to stop killers from killing because killing is wrong, we should kill them?
 Sent2: So we kill killers, but in the end, end up with more murders.

Output: Not similar


Input: Consider Input: Sent1: The death penalty is not used for what it is supposed to be used for.
 Sent2: I think the death penalty should only be used in extreme cases where the accused is, without a doubt, guilty.

Output: Not similar


Input: Consider Input: Sent1: i think the death penalty should be abolished because some people are sentenced to deathfor a crime they might have not committed.
 Sent2: Well I think that if someone commits a crime worthy of the death penalty they should get a sentence for life that way they can't be a repeat offender.


Output: Not similar