In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Q: Comment: Yeah, I'e been living with this issue for most of my life. I'm happy to keep it alive.

There's no question that men who make sexual overtures from a position of power commit an abuse of power. And yes, it's exactly these blurry lines that become problematic.

When I was quite young (I may even have been a minor) I had a boss who got sexual with me when we were alone in a room. I rebuffed him, and he was a gentleman about it. I was really annoyed, but I continued to work at that job for a while. Was it an abuse of power? Yes. Was it a crime? Actually, legally it may have been. But I don't think of it as a crime. Women used to experience this kind of stuff all the time. I'd like to think the culture has changed a bit since then.

Unfortunately, as you may remember, I have also been a rape victim. So I give women who claim they've been raped the benefit of the doubt. But...at times, it's not the truth.

A: Sexual-explicit
****
Q: Comment: He "lowered the waistband of his pants while simultaneously elevating his genitals in a single suave, well-practiced motion."

A: Sexual-explicit
****
Q: Comment: It's funny how the mainstream media totally acts as if they didn't report on the wiretapping of Trump tower when they were all up in arms with the whole Russian/Trump conspiracy theory they had going on right before the election, I think it was literally 2 days before the election that they reported on wiretaps of Trump tower. These dumbies are pitiful, we'll hear all about those reports at the hearing on Monday, it should be funny to watch them squirm as they're confronted with their own propaganda as the evidence to back Trumps claims, man these leftist are dumb.

A:
Non-sexual-explicit
****