In this task, you're given a statement, and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence clearly disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3' corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.

Input: Consider Input: Statement: It's no good arguing about how it was done. Choices:  1. There's no point in arguing about the logistics. 2. It'd be better for us to argue about how it was done. 3. Arguing is going to waste too much time and we need a solution right now.

Output: 2


Input: Consider Input: Statement: well so much of it is game playing with the lawyers they're plea doing their plea bargaining and and uh give and take type situation that uh they're playing with people's lives in effect uh by offering uh to uh uh offering to announce their guilt to a certain degree on a crime in order to get uh a lighter uh sentence sentence Choices:  1. Many people that are innocent take plea bargains just to avoid trial.  2. Plea bargaining is a game.  3. Lawyers take plea bargaining seriously. 

Output: 3


Input: Consider Input: Statement: 10 For simplicity, these fiscal policy simulations assume that saving by households, businesses, and state and local governments remains constant as a share of GDP and that the surpluses saved are used to reduce debt held by the public. Choices:  1. The fiscal policy simulations assume that saving by households remains constant for 7 years at a time. 2. The fiscal policy simulations assume that saving by households remains constant. 3. The fiscal policy simulations assume that saving by households remain in a highly fluctuant period.


Output: 3