In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: insult and non-insult. Insult is any lanugage or act that is disrespectful or scornfully abusive.

Q: Comment: Billy Ray Powers:  Most folks are knowledgeable about the wonderful Russian folks we have visited in Russia, and know here in Alaska.  We know you support Donald J. Trump along with many other Alaskans.  Your guy won... woo hoo for you and his faithful supporters! 

The Russians have a government, Putin is a former KGB guy...they are messing into our election process and no one is saying their involvement is why Trump won.  Trump has agreed that the USA deserves to elect someone without Russia or other  outside interference.

A: Non-insult
****
Q: Comment: The primary definition of a “weapon” is: “a thing designed or used for inflicting bodily harm or physical damage.”
A "lash" is the flexible part of a whip. A whip is primarily used to cause pain as punishment or as a stimulus to action. I suspect that Jesus wasn't intent on inflicting bodily harm on the moneychangers, and upsetting the tables may have scattered "the merchandise," but there was no physical damage.
Jesus "took the lash" to "stimulate" an examination of conscience: "It is written: 'My house shall be a house of prayer,' but you are making it a den of thieves.'" (Mt. 21:13)
Again, the one time a weapon -- a sword not a whip -- was wielded in Jesus’ presence, he clearly demanded, “Stop, no more of this!” (Lk.21:51)
Jesus "took the lash" once and then laid it down. He said, "I have given you a model to follow." We have taken and continue taking up arms to inflict bodily pain and physical damage. When will we follow Jesus example and lay down all weapons?

A: Non-insult
****
Q: Comment: I am glad we are finally seeing through the PM's sincerity and the Liberal indigenous reconciliation platform.  It's all an act and a bunch of empty promises. The speaches make Canadians, particularly our indigenous population, feel good but at the end of the day, nothing has changed in almost two years into the Liberal mandate. This government, instead of taking swift and concrete action to better the lives of the indigenous population, is still intent on talking well, making promises but delivering very little, if at all. The Liberals' focus is on bolstering the PM's international image, spending our tax dollars on international programs of dubious value, and direct enormous public resources on bringing more refugees and immigrants, in lieu of using those resources, fiscal and human, for the benefit of indigenous people. Such a misguided globalist policy! It is said that charity starts at home: let's take care of our own, let's elevate their standard of living before anyone else's!

A:
Non-insult
****