In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

[Q]: Comment: I also don't understand why she would appeal such a light sentence. She was directly responsible for the death of a father and daughter. I hope other people learn that stopping your car in a live lane on a highway is not only idiotic, it can also lead to jail if your actions injure or kill someone. Hopefully the widow will feel some closure now.
[A]: Non-identity-attack


[Q]: Comment: "It doesn't keep elections 'pure' it just drives the money into STUPID AREAS"

Well, that's a useful bunch of gibberish. It's not like there aren't elections all around the world with campaign finance laws that work quite well.

"You want to get good candidates get rid of every restriction BUT the REPORTING requirements."

Here's a better idea: leave every candidate with limited but equal financing -- so that candidates focus solely on explaining why their policy is superior to all others -- and every citizen, whether billionaire or hobo has but one equal voice.

It's "one man one vote" not "one dollar one vote."
[A]: Non-identity-attack


[Q]: Comment: How many years have these NDP twits been festering on the opposition benches? All that time and their answer to the complexities  of lower mainland housing is a $400 rebate for renters.   That's their great policy revelation? They're even less intelligent, less imaginative and less capable than I thought. 

My friends there's silly, very silly and the NDP. They're even worse than the Alberta NDP and that's  tough to beat.
[A]:
Non-identity-attack