We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Sent1: Now tell me, how is gun control going to stop people from making their own?
 Sent2: As I think some people who wuv their guns would just XXXX the ignorant politician away with their newly illegal gun.
Not similar

Sent1: You can't be a man unless you're swinging a gun, and no matter how many guns you buy, it's still missing for you .
 Sent2: You're right that gun control isn't about guns, however, but 'control' is a secondary matter, a means to an end.
Not similar

Sent1: The first part indicates the importance of the militia, the second part illustrates that the people may be part of that well regulated body or not without infringement of their right to keep and bear arms.
 Sent2: Please note that the argument is that the reason people shall have the right to keep and bear arms is in order to maintain a well regulated militia.

Not similar