instruction:
We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.
question:
This study has been so distorted in the media and within anti death penalty literature that it really should be mandatory teaching in journalism schools as a fact checking disaster.
answer:
Valid


question:
Eyewitnesses are frequently unreliable, DNA evidence has been overturned, and even personal confessions are unreliable: several people confessed to being the Yorkshire Ripper here in the UK who were found to have nothing to do with it.
answer:
Valid


question:
For the record, I'm a fan of the death penalty, although I feel the laws (indeed the entire legal system) needs to be reworked to some extent before it becomes a viable option.
answer:

Valid