In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

[EX Q]: Comment: During the day I believe he went to prospective houses where he hoped to harm individuals, knocking on doors during the day where he asked for work.  He is an admitted liar.  He is manipulative producing his penciled writing.  It may be the cover story.  He is definitely a thug perhaps for political purposes.  He may not be who he presents himself at all.  He may just be an operative of some type perhaps a paid assassin.  How would you like him showing up at your door with your family there - while you are at work.  He may have.  Not buying his penciled story.  He is an admitted liar among other qualities.  He no doubt has his admirers and cohorts in various interests.  The one's he and his associates have not "mentioned".  Gullible reporting?  What's his military record?  I don't believe his story.  He is a bad character for sure.
[EX A]: Non-sexual-explicit

[EX Q]: Comment: If you can show me any part of the comment this isn't true to the letter, I'll take it down myself... Peyton is Rich, he IS White, and he's showing his political preferences by golfing with the sitting President.....Just like John Elway, he's showing you who he REALLY is... sorry you don't accept the truth about your hero.... Peyton only believes in color..... the green of money...NOT a racist, a CAPITALIST...
[EX A]: Non-sexual-explicit

[EX Q]: Comment: Women want sex with men ? Really ? Lesbians dont want sex with men  and  work very hard to train all young impressionable  women of the dangers any man poses  even if he offered her a seat on the bus. Re-wording the song is an act of hetero-phobia.
[EX A]:
Sexual-explicit