In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

Ex Input:
Comment: The link to the post by the Democrat activist has "magically" disappeared. I guess she's forgotten that the Internet is forever and that screen shots of her petty screed will be available. How mean-spirited can you get when the VP's family has a small private outdoor wedding in a park-AS DO THOUSANDS OF OTHER COUPLES-and you decide because you don't like the Marines or the groom's Dad to be a nasty, vindictive witch. And you can spell that any way you want. From what I've witnessed locally, online and via public posts by a slate of Democrat talking heads from Pelosi to Waters to Jackson to Wilson-Democrats are simply sore losers who can't get over the fact that Hillary was disliked by many people, including many women.

Ex Output:
Non-identity-attack


Ex Input:
Comment: Might as well breakout the ass trays and allow smoking inside. Lol. I eat peanuts or some type of treenut everyday in the comforts of my own home. I've always considered others in public settings and made sure I didn't bring traces to these areas. McD's has lost my respect and business on this decision.  Not sure why I support those who are affected by allergies but I'm glad I'm not ignorant to their struggles.

Ex Output:
Non-identity-attack


Ex Input:
Comment: The Communist China sellout and shiny pony entourage in the same sentence as 'truth'? I'll take Jane Fonda's input any day over our .1% sellout of a selfie stick!

Ex Output:

Non-identity-attack