In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Q: Comment: Man, go post that Raider crap on an Oakland newspaper, er, I mean a Vegas newspaper ahahahahaha

A: Obscene
****
Q: Comment: Hirono and Schatz would be disappointed with Christ if he ran as a Republican.  The Democrats are in serious trouble.  They've gone so far out to the extreme, they've completely lost their way.  Obstruction is the only thing they think they can do.  Voters will not reward them for their obstruction. Folks elected Trump because they were tired of this continued schoolyard bickering in Washington. Under Obama the divisiveness grew to new high levels.  Americans are tired of this crap.

A: Obscene
****
Q: Comment: If not a specific law being broken, there are certainly all kind of immoral things being done. The real point of my post was that Trump had so many of his voters worked up about supposed "pay-to-play" with Hillary and the Clinton Foundation (to the point where they loved to chant "Lock her up!!!"), when multiple investigations revealed there was none. We have seen so many actual pay-to play incidents with the Trump administration already that the people who were upset about non-existent "pay-to-play" with Hillary would be huge hypocrites f they weren't at least as upset with what is going on now. It's not just the latest one with Ivanka, but Trump's multiple business dealings with foreign governments and in the U.S. For instance, he goes to Mar a Lago every weekend, calls it the "Southern Whit House" and upped the dues from $100,000 per year to $200,00 per year after he was elected. He said in December in an interview that he had a conflict of interest when it came to Turkey (cont)

A:
Non-obscene
****