We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Q: Sent1: A death penalty case is likely to be appealed as high as it will be taken.
 Sent2: Death penalty cases involve a lot of appeals and them lawyers are really expensive.

A: Similar
****
Q: Sent1: So far, I am hearing "an eye for an eye" which is just that vengeance centered sense of justice that I am arguing against.
 Sent2: I do believe in the death Penalty, eye for and eye.

A: Similar
****
Q: Sent1: Especially given that you have accepted that some innocent people are executed.
 Sent2: There are also people who will tell you that the death penalty actually kills innocent people.

A:
Similar
****