We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

Ex Input:
If the Right to Keep and Bear Arms, or any of the other rights guaranteed by the Constitution are to be abridged, they must ne done so by legal means, i.e. constitutional amendment.

Ex Output:
Valid


Ex Input:
Then again anyone with the "bejesus" scared out of them by the exercise of free speech of others is not quite sane.

Ex Output:
Valid


Ex Input:
After all, since these lethal weapons are only used to kill or maim, the police must only carry them to kill or maim, huh?

Ex Output:

Valid