In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Example Input: Comment: Trid sees nothing wrong with "No Dogs or Jews", "We don't serve Muslims" and so on. He supports bigotry. And no, that is NOT a straw man, but the clear and obvious implication of your " If either the buyer or the seller does not want to enter into that contract for whatever reason then I believe they have the right to refuse." Thank you for proving that your claim to being a Christian is a complete sham.
Example Output: Non-sexual-explicit

Example Input: Comment: "If the law[judge] supposes that," said Mr. Bumble, ... "the law[judge] is a ass—a idiot."

* In English literature ass is a donkey and should not be censored!
Example Output: Sexual-explicit

Example Input: Comment: Misuse by the user.

Yup. Cause aaaallll those users, they just went right out and got pills from the local grocery store.

Oh no! Wait! They were given prescriptions by uninformed, misinformed, ignorant, and willingly ignorant, mis-prescribing physicians.

Let's put the damn blame where it really belongs--on the "supply" end, which ended up creating a "demand" end.
Example Output:
Non-sexual-explicit