In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: threat and non-threat. Threat is a statement that someone will be hurt or harmed, especially if the person does not do something in particular.

[EX Q]: Comment: Of Course you aren't frustrated because you don't care a wiff about honesty and integrity. You babble on constantly about issues that no longer apply. It's hard to be frustrated when you don't even understand the issues Captain. And you have shown that trend over and over again. 

They say ignorance is bliss and you are it's poster child.
[EX A]: Non-threat

[EX Q]: Comment: "Soylent Orange" is Trumpism. Sessions said "it's an honor to be able to SERVE you". Really? you swore an oath to serve our country, not a demagogue. Your loyalty is required to be to our constitutional principles, not to any person. 
That ridiculous 'fawning fan fest of flattery' was the most embarrassing and gratuitous display of brown-nosing I have ever witnessed. Does this weak leader have no humility? Does his fragile egomania require constant praise?
[EX A]: Non-threat

[EX Q]: Comment: There is no national obsession. This is a figment of Doyle's mind. It is his obsession, one shared by a relatively small number of similar shut-ins who still think the CBC is relevant somehow. 

Get a life. Mansbridge was terrible and oversaw a significant decline in quality and then in viewership. His successor will be even more insignificant.
[EX A]:
Non-threat