Categorize the comment on the basis of obscenity. If the comment is obscene output Yes, otherwise output No.

Ex Input:
It would be wonderful to have so with higher credentials perform tests. There have been small scale tests performed. There are no retail investors to exploit the potential profits.

Steve is a conservationist, so many of the projects they hope this will support have an environmental focus.

For the salinity concern collection volumes are focused on surplus flow like storm run off. Most of the collection points were designed to be portable to minimize impacts on fishing industry and migratory species.

You can learn more at RiverRecycler.com

Ex Output:
No


Ex Input:
the RG can be an absolute embarrassment to professional journalism. We're no longer debating the issue of social parasites pawned off as "homeless," we're discussing the intellectual bankruptcy of the RG censoring debate.

Ex Output:
Yes


Ex Input:
The News Minor has an article that has better specifics, and they are reporting that the money would still come from the earnings reserve, and not the fund itself.  The fund would continue to grow.

Ex Output:

No