In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Example Input: Comment: Jones has no "style", just rant.

If Coulter modified her style, she'd be taken more seriously by what some would call Mainstream people presumably those giving "funnies" here--and with a good degree of validity. She makes some great observations about her country, its policies and people. Trouble is, she does it with a sledge-hammer.
Example Output: Non-obscene

Example Input: Comment: op is dumb as cow shit for sure..
Example Output: Obscene

Example Input: Comment: "Perhaps we shouldn’t have expected better from a businessman who campaigned on racial animus against Latinos and Muslims, who questioned our first black president’s birthright to run for the office, who hired a top adviser whose online publication is a darling of the alt-right ... "

Indeed.  We shouldn't have expected better.  We just lived through a campaign and election of false equivalence and now we have a presidency of false equivalence.

Dog-whistle Trump has salted his administration with extremists like Bannon, Miller, and Gorka after promising to "Make America, ahem 'Great' Again."

Did anyone doubt that white supremacists like David Duke and his followers would be emboldened by Trump's "MAGA" campaign and appointments? This is their dream come true.

Let's hope and pray that this terrible presidency is the last of its kind and will immunize the electorate from ever choosing so badly again.
Example Output:
Non-obscene