instruction:
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
question:
Excellent piece. People don't realize that it is ultimately the consumer who is pinched by these so-called business-only taxes; they are more or less pass-thru charges that hurt businesses (impairing their ability to compete with companies not exposed to the same taxes), workers (when costs of being in business go up, companies lay off workers), and consumers who pay higher prices for the same stuff as they did before.  Enough is enough. Perhaps the hostile tax environment may be part of the reason that the economy is so services oriented in Oregon. A lot of the Fortune 500 companies have left. The problem with such a services-oriented economy is that it is not very flexible. So, when economic downturns come around every 8 years, or so, the Oregon and other services-oriented economies (e.g. Arizona) is hit harder than the national average; a lot of the money used to pay for those services is sourced from discretionary income.  In recessions, people have less discretionary consumption.
answer:
No


question:
But it will provide an alternative which more roads do not.
answer:
No


question:
https://www.muni.org/Departments/Fire/Wildfire/Documents/ANCHORAGE_WILDFIRE_May_2004_Program_Report.pdf. 

Here is a long winded study the city published. If you read this closely, you will see many notations in regards to the "Fuel" problem on the HillSide. It will also show how we are not truly prepared to address the situation.  Yes, there has been some correction, but nothing compared to what needs to be done. It's not, if it happens, it's when will it happen? Until we take major steps to reduce the fuel up there, it's a future killing field. I no longer have the numbers at my finger tips, but there was another study which identified just how much total fuel was up there. It compared it to "Powder Kegs".
answer:

Yes