In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: insult and non-insult. Insult is any lanugage or act that is disrespectful or scornfully abusive.

Q: Comment: There was no excuse for this. There would have been signs posted saying no entry. Furthermore to get into the tunnel the driver would have had to travel on the street car track.

Penalties for incidents like this should be increased to cover the inconvenience idiots cause. In this case it would be in the $thousands.

Stupidity is not an excuse.

A: Insult
****
Q: Comment: A loser calling Trump a loser.  HA! HA! HA!  I  want to be a loser  like Trump!

A: Insult
****
Q: Comment: People are definitely confusing Apples and Oranges.

By the slant of this story, this "exemption" from meeting regular immigration requirements is only for those people who could not otherwise qualify to enter Canada. Otherwise they'd just apply through the regular process and never mention their sexuality.

So just as we try to screen/assess any other applicant who does not qualify for admission to Canada under regular processes, and might qualify under an exception category, so must this category of person be screened/assessed to see whether they are actually escaping gay persecution, or whether they just trying an end-run on the system that would otherwise keep them out of Canada.

When you make exceptions to your primary rules, you also need to be able to test them so that otherwise undesirables don't slip through the net.

No more tears please about people who can't get into Canada for whatever reason. There are numerous other civilized countries that will let them in.

A:
Non-insult
****