In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Example Input: Comment: There are more important things to worry about instead of bathroom laws and transgender rights. Once again, USA  is the laughing stock of the world.
Example Output: Non-sexual-explicit

Example Input: Comment: Oh, Gerson, you are fighting for your life as political insider.  You are nothing to Trump and would not have any ins.  You betray your party and throw in with Hillary rather than lose your insider status.  Very low Gerson, we need you out of politics and political commentary.
Example Output: Non-sexual-explicit

Example Input: Comment: I'm delighted that Adrienne King is no longer a prosecutor. She's a victim blamer. She's also a nitwit who has internalized misogyny, what Bruno Bettleheim called, "identification with the oppressor." The women who complained about being groped by Trump had reported the assaults to friends, partners, husbands, at the time of the incidents, or otherwise many years ago. The first one who spoke did not initiate the contact with the media, but it was done by a friend who, given the "Bush" video, thought the unwelcome contact should be brought to public attention. ABC, I believe, encouraged her to describe what happened, overcoming her reluctance. This wasn't any grand conspiracy, bu t was the not-uncommon experience of similar cases of serial abuse victims.

Both she and Dianne Ackerson are given to gratuitous vulgarisms. "Broad?," "fricken liar?" I would hope that women would take their prospective real estate business elsewhere, leaving her to reap the consequences of her ignorance.
Example Output:
Non-sexual-explicit