We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

[EX Q]: Even though he says he's neither in the collective or individual column he is clearly in the collective column simply by suggesting that the right to bear arms requires you to be in the militia (which SCOTUS disagrees with.)
[EX A]: Valid

[EX Q]: I can understand your belief that gun control won't work and that owning guns is a good thing, I don't agree with it, but is hardly beyond comprehension.
[EX A]: Valid

[EX Q]: If you repealed the 2nd amendment or any "incorporated" amendment than that amendment would no longer be law thus not "incorporated" (obviously since there is nothing to incorporate).
[EX A]:
Valid