We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Q: Sent1: I think the death penalty is one of the several punishment in the law system, we shouldn't consider it like something insane, and moreover it's normal in some countries nowadays.
 Sent2: I cannot compare numbers with other western countries since we are the only one with capital punishment.

A: Not similar
****
Q: Sent1: If it is as serious as torture or murder... Yes we should.
 Sent2: So we kill killers, but in the end, end up with more murders.

A: Not similar
****
Q: Sent1: Killing a person for them killing someone else ( I understand this is not necessarily the criteria for receiving the death penalty) makes you no better than the executed.
 Sent2: You make it sound as though if someone is innocent, of anything, they should be killed.

A:
Not similar
****