In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.
--------
Question: Comment: Sigh ... sadly evoking a some commenters here on the R-G site who define every new Donald Trump revelation as simply losers whining about the results of the last election, I have to say, as the feces continues to move into the fan with the power and consistency of a conveyor belt, that (damn) if ever there was an agenda this country needed, it was the politics of Bernie Sanders. Reform systems skewed for the wealthiest 1%, reform the worst health care system in the developed nations, reform the economics of higher education, and do what we can to halt the human damage to our planet. Hindsight and all that; and (damn) I didn't even vote for him in the primary.

Answer: Obscene


Question: Comment: "Damn that 1st Amendment!" ...

-- the FEC --

Answer: Obscene


Question: Comment: You claim "[c]ampus conservatives can do their part to fix this mess by bringing speakers who will articulate conservative thought rather than simply smash liberal pieties."  But how can they when Leftist thugs routinely terrorize campuses to prevent speakers from speaking?  Campus administrations have uniformly proven themselves feckless to confront these domestic terrorists and campus police are directed to do nothing except watch and collect their paychecks.  When Antifa demostrate every characteristic of actual terrorists and they are not designated as a terrorist organization (New Jersey has designated them as a terrorist organization, but they are the only ones) what can be done?  How can the western world stand up against international terrorism when it won't even control our own homegrown terrorists (and such silly ones at that)?

Answer:
Non-obscene