In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Input: Consider Input: Comment: But Brexit, Trump, etc. have shown people can be di*cks! Many of them don't even know what they are voting for.

Output: Sexual-explicit


Input: Consider Input: Comment: Peeing in the park/alley when you think no one is looking is not an offense that requires registration as a sex offender in the State of Colorado. It does not meet the elements of Indecent Exposure, which requires a KNOWING exposure of genitals to the view of another person when done with the intent to arouse. It also does not meet the elements of Public Indecency (which only requires registration after a second conviction within 5 years), which requires a KNOWING exposure of genitals to the view of another person.

Also, the juvenile sex offender registry is not made available to the public in the same way as the adult sex offender registry. And first-time juvenile sex offenders are able to petition for de-registration once they have successfully completed their sentence.

Output: Sexual-explicit


Input: Consider Input: Comment: As usual, the swamp dwellers like to pretend ignorance when knowing what people mean.  "Wiretapping", to the unknowing can be a generic term for surveillance.  The Intel committees aren't asking the correct question.  The question SHOULD be:  "Was there surveillance of ANY KIND, electronic, human, and/or any other type commonly or uncommonly,  legally or illegally, used; against any facility, equipment, individuals, or any other construct or entity, involved with the Trump campaign, transition team, family, etc. in ANY capacity?
That should wipe that smug look off Comey's face.


Output: Non-sexual-explicit