In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

[EX Q]: Comment: That's right. The leftist media refuses to report news about what Clinton does. I just learned from reading the alternative. Clinton's people just got caught red handed registering dead voters. There is no low they won't stoop to.
[EX A]: Non-identity-attack

[EX Q]: Comment: I've been a tory voter since the 60's and I've just one thing to say. I'm finished with the bad-mouthing, negative bollocks coming out of the CPC. I'm going to have a terrible choice to make come 2019. The liberal free spending but ultimately positive agenda or the negative, vitriolic politicking of the CPC. I yearn for the days of Stanfield, Clark and even Mulroney. The change came when the reform party changed the conservatives for ever. Out went the caring, conciliatory conservatives and in came the nasty attack dogs of Manning and Harper. Maybe it's time for a fourth party in Canada. Bring back the Progressives and give us Red Tories a party to vote for.
[EX A]: Non-identity-attack

[EX Q]: Comment: Thanks for your false equivalence statement.....and I am not a great supporter of selecting a mixed group,of folks in an unscientific way and interviewing them....NCR has done this before and as Monica noted in the prior case you simply have 7 opinions of individuals. period....

I can go to the grocery store and find 7 similarly aged folks....and if interviewed that's all I would have 7 opinions.

Really wish the NCR would use professional methods or just skip this scenario.
[EX A]:
Non-identity-attack