In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence can be inferred from the statement. Incorrect choices change the meaning in important ways or have details that are not mentioned in the statement. Indicate your answer as 1,2, or 3 corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.

Q: Statement: And it is impossible to see how this difference from Rust has any bearing upon the First Amendment question, which, to repeat, is whether the funding scheme is 'manipulated' to have a 'coercive effect' on those who do not hold the subsidized position. Choices:  1. It is not possible to see how this difference from Rust has any bearing on the First Amendment question. 2. The difference from Rust on the First Amendment question is very noticeable. 3. The question that was asked it really rather very subjective.

A: 1
****
Q: Statement: This was 1971, not 1917! Choices:  1. This was the year 1971, not the year 1917. 2. This was 1971, but people were acting like it was 1917. 3. This was 1917, and 1971 wouldn't come around for another fifty years.

A: 1
****
Q: Statement: In 1954, some experimental psychologists randomly divided 24 sixth-grade boys into two groups and took them to Robbers Cave State Park, Okla., for summer camp. Choices:  1. The psychologists made two groups with 12 boys in each group. 2. The 24 boys were the top students in their class. 3. The psychologists divided the 24 boys according to their height.

A:
1
****