We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

Input: Consider Input: All of the Gun control you call for has been tried in other countries and the Criminals Still import guns in with their drugs.

Output: Valid


Input: Consider Input: Those who claim that Australia suffered a "crime wave" as a result of new gun laws often cite as evidence unrelated figures for common assault or sexual assault (no weapon) and armed robbery (any weapon).

Output: Valid


Input: Consider Input: My train of thought is pretty elementary; if the ruling goes our way, that means that the court took notice of a large dose of original intent.


Output: Valid