The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.

[EX Q]: Context: 'Hello there' 'Hello'
Utterance: 'What kind of items do you need?  I especially need water because I would like to do extra hiking and would need to hydrate.  '
[EX A]: No

[EX Q]: Context: 'I tell you what if we trade 3 food for 3 waters! I think that would be fair snice you said you need some food and snice I need some water. 🙂' 'Well, I do have some food but if I trade you all 3 packages of water, I won't have any at all. How about 2 packages of water, so we each have 1 package, including your sister?' 'How about this it think it will work out better for us and you snice you need fire wood too. You get 3 food and 2 firewood and and I get 3 water and 1 firewood. 🙂🙂'
Utterance: 'I really don't want to be without water, how about 2 water and 2 firewood for the 3 packages of food?'
[EX A]: No

[EX Q]: Context: 'Oh, that does change things a lot. Diabetes is a hard disease to have to deal with. So you want more firewood than water? And less food than water?' 'Well, I don't know.  I think I would like more water than firewood, but yes less food than water.  I'm a pretty easy going person though! 🙂' 'Ok, let me know what you think and we will go from there. I do prefer more food and firewood than water though.'
Utterance: 'Okay, it sounds like we are pretty agreeable here.  I will wait for you to make an offer if you would like to.'
[EX A]:
No