In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence can be inferred from the statement. Incorrect choices change the meaning in important ways or have details that are not mentioned in the statement. Indicate your answer as 1,2, or 3 corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.

Example Input: Statement: The ceiling was painted by Tiepolo in 1764. Choices:  1. Tiepolo painted the ceiling in 1875. 2. Tiepolo painted the ceiling. 3. Tiepolo painted the ceiling without any assistance.
Example Output: 2

Example Input: Statement: When you hear that despite the fact that he has economists who know better, the Justice Department's Joel Klein apparently either believes or chooses to claim that this case is about path dependence, you start to wonder. Choices:  1. Joel Klein is lying about the case, and it's obvious why. 2. Joel Klein's claim that the case is about path dependence is fully backed up by his economists. 3. Joel Klein says that this case is about path dependence, even though the economists who work for him know that isn't true.
Example Output: 3

Example Input: Statement: Similarly, Bush boasts that he's a uniter, not a divider, while the RLC complains that Forbes, by criticizing Dole in 1996, caused fighting within the Republican Party that was divisive and not inclusive. Choices:  1. Bush is a divider, not a uniter. 2. Forbes criticized Dole in the mid 90s. 3. According to Bush he is a uniter, not a divider.
Example Output:
3