The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the self-need strategy, otherwise output No. self-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to create a personal need for an item in the negotiation, such as by pointing out that the participant sweats a lot to show preference towards water packages.

Example Input: Context: 'Hello, are there any of the three items that you want to be sure you have enough of? 🙂' 'I want to be sure that I have enough firewood.  I want to relax, sit around the campfire, and roast hot dogs and marshmallows.  What about you?' 'That sounds great! I like all three items, but I definitely want to make sure I have enough water, especially to drink and stay hydrated and full of as much energy as possible. I require a lot of liquid as a 6-foot-4, 260-pound guy!'
Utterance: 'I don't think the weather is going to be that hot, and I don't plan on doing any hiking.  So, I should need much extra water.'
Example Output: Yes

Example Input: Context: 'Yeah, What did think about water? ' 'I think water is great! I don't need very much for this trip, but water is delicious.' 'Okay, but water is important to me because I have health issues. So I drink more water for save my health.'
Utterance: 'Okay! You can have all the water. I want all the food.'
Example Output: No

Example Input: Context: 'Thats great! Would it be okay if I got 2 packages of firewood, and 1 each of the food and water?' 'I would've like to have 2 packages of firewood instead. How about I give you all the extra water packages?' 'Well for a compromise I will give you the 2 packages of firewood, if I got 1 firewood, 2 food, and 3 waters. 🙂'
Utterance: 'Great, that sounds fair to me. '
Example Output:
No