TASK DEFINITION: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the no-need strategy, otherwise output No. no-need is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used when a participant points out that they do not need an item based on personal context such as suggesting that they have ample water to spare. no-need can directly benefit the opponent since it implies that the item is up for grabs.
PROBLEM: Context: 'Hello! I'm so excited for this camping trip. What do you still need as your supplies?' 'I think food, water, and firewood are all going to be fairly important.'
Utterance: 'I agree. I have diabetes, so water and food are super important to me. My diabetes makes me super thirsty and I have to make sure I keep my blood sugar under control with certain foods ☹️'

SOLUTION: No

PROBLEM: Context: 'Oh. Let do some deal. If you give me all water bottles I will give you 2 firewood. Can you accept this' 'i could give you 2 water bottles and 3 food if you can do 3 firewood' 'OK. Are you need Extra food packages?'
Utterance: 'no, I am okay with food which is why I offered them all to you since all my firewood is ruined. I figured if i gave you 2 water and 3 food you might be able to spare the 3 firewood'

SOLUTION: Yes

PROBLEM: Context: 'Yeah, it's very sad these days' 'Then I got here and noticed I didn't pack my cooking sterno and critters go into some of my food☹️Kinda puts a damper on the trip.' 'Oh, i see. How about you get 2 food 1 firewood and 1 water. I need the extra firewood to stay warm at night'
Utterance: 'Yeah, that should work. I brought plenty of water and the critters left that alone. You planning to go out on the trails at all?'

SOLUTION:
Yes