Categorize the comment on the basis of severe toxicity. If the comment is severely toxic output Yes, otherwise output No.
--------
Question: Crisis, hardly. The only ones that did cry, were Bill & Hillary. And yet he was punished by the act of disbarment. All the while, those "family values" Republicans;  Newt Gingrich, Bob Livingston, and Dennis Hastert that were sitting on the impeachment panel should have recused themselves for similar or a much worse offense. The initial charges never rose to the level of full impeachment. Get over it.

Answer: No


Question: Time to throw these bums out of office

Answer: Yes


Question: Guestsquared:  It's really too bad you can't manage to discuss an issue without inserting one or more personal insults.  Again, may I suggest disagreeing with you on this issue or any other does make a person, ipso facto, "ill-informed." I could reply with a like comment and we could waste time and energy exchanging insults.  I'm not interested in doing that. 

 We know, although you and the others who support this law will never acknowledge it,  that it was specifically written to "discourage" panhandling by punishing anyone who donats to panhandlers from a car.   This ban, of course, eliminates the primary source of contributions to panhandlers. It's designed to give Springfield panhandlers the "bum's rush", while hopefully passing the test of its Constitutionality.  It may be supported by the Courts, it may not be.  As I've repeatedly said, that is the Courts' responsibility.  We'll likely get to see how it "plays out."

Answer:
No