Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.

Example Input: If they were acquiring the A320s they could turn around and sell them, if they don't want to operate a mixed fleet. At least they'd get some of their $2.6 billion back. So it certainly makes sense to factor in the planes.

If they go to an all Boeing fleet, all the Virgin employees are going to have to be trained on the 737, from pilot training to ground logistics.  It's going to be expensive, no matter which way they go.
Example Output: No

Example Input: If someone nefarious is climbing through the kitchen window of my log cabin, you're suggesting that I should have to saddle up, ride to the nearest gun range, unlock a safe with I don't know what by lantern light, giddy-up my butt back to my property and then try to load my musket long after all my beef jerky and the missus have been hauled off in my stolen buckboard? You really believe the framers had that in mind for a well-regulated militia?
Example Output: Yes

Example Input: God grief! Have some common sense man.

Bill Clinton made an incredibly stupid decision to get a blow job from a young woman who was coming on to him. Good lord, the POTUS could have gotten more with less risk through discreet channels.

And, he dissembled; unwisely using lawyerly language in a futile attempt to get out of his predicament.

Both of these decision are fair game for criticism, and I am not excusing them.

However, he was hardly a "sexual predator."

-- Paul
Example Output:
Yes