In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

Ex Input:
Comment: Oh, “BIGOTRY!”
Homosexual acts are sinful, and, according to Sacred Scripture, one of the four sins “crying to heaven for vengeance.”  A gay marriage is (un)naturally going to involve said acts.  Are you capable of comprehending this?  The baker doesn’t want to participate in a wedding that promotes this sin.  Now, a bigot is “a person who is obstinately or intolerantly devoted to his or her own opinions and prejudices; [you certainly fit that description to a tee] especially :one who regards or treats the members of a group (such as a racial or ethnic group) with hatred and intolerance.”
The question boils down to obstinacy and intolerance.  Well, when bases his opinion or belief of something as crystal clear as”homosexual behavior is sinful”, is it obstinacy or principled dissent?  And why do you think we should be tolerant of sin?  That certainly isn’t Christ-like, being as that Christ admonished everyone to “sin no more.”  You are the obstinate bigot here, clearly.

Ex Output:
Identity-attack


Ex Input:
Comment: When is the G&M going to publish an article called "Why are so many Muslims terrorists " ?

Ex Output:
Identity-attack


Ex Input:
Comment: And there is probably  only one reply to such an terribly  insensitive comment coming from a very privileged individual.   With a Cat 3 hurricane baring down on Floridians today, unfortunately any rational reply to STO would probably  be a bit too un-civil for 'civil comments'  That's my best guess...What kind of jokes will you be telling about earthquake victims the next time a 'big one' hits our area.  You'll just be laughing yourself silly at your own 'jokes' won't you?

Ex Output:

Non-identity-attack