The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.

Ex Input:
Context: 'I'm a big fan of well seasoned food and mushrooms! Mmm.. 🙂 Do you think it would also be alright for me to have 2 of the 3 waters since I will be hiking a lot?' 'That would be fine.  I was hoping to have 2 but since I am only walking and you are doing more heavy duty hiking, you take them.  Agreed?' 'I really appreciate that. Do you think you will be okay with just 1 water since you have health issues?'
Utterance: 'That would be very nice, but I worry about you not having enough on the trail.  Dehydration would not be good.  I am pretty sure I can ration my supply to make it last.  🙂'

Ex Output:
No


Ex Input:
Context: 'I'll tell you what I'm willing to do.. I can't really budge on the water.. BUT.. I could do something where I take 2 water, and only one firewood, but two food.. does that work for you?' 'so if i were to  give you water what would i get ?' 'You'd be getting 1 water, 2 firewood, and 1 food'
Utterance: 'how much food are you willing to offer for water'

Ex Output:
No


Ex Input:
Context: 'good excellent choice' 'so how do you want to divide the firewood' 'take 2 firewood if you wish'
Utterance: 'sure, deal'

Ex Output:

No