In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine the neutral choice based on your inference from the statement and your commonsense knowledge. The neutral choice is a sentence that neither agrees nor disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3', corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence. If sentence X agrees with sentence Y, one's correctness follows from the other one. If sentence X disagrees with sentence Y, they can not be correct at the same time.

Ex Input:
Statement: Waterloo? frowned Tuppence. Choices: 1. Waterloo excited Tuppence very much as he smiled. 2. Tuppence was not happy about Waterloo. 3. Waterloo caused Tuppence to furrow his brow due to the implications brought by the name.

Ex Output:
3


Ex Input:
Statement: yeah that's that's the uh that's that's the big thing you know we still got a little bit of the old you know Vietnam um problem in you know in the back of our minds we we got this we're we're used to wars where you can get in do the job and get out Choices: 1. We still have the Vietnam mentality where we think we can just get in and get out, it's bad for our nation and the troops. 2. We still have the Vietnam mentality where we think we can just get in and get out of wars. 3. We don't have the Vietnam mentality anymore.

Ex Output:
1


Ex Input:
Statement: it has been determined that there are insufficient federalism implications to warrant to the preparation of a Federalism Assessment. Choices: 1. The warrant isn't needed.  2. There aren't sufficient federalism implications to warrant the preparation of federalism assessment.  3. There are more than sufficient  implications to warrant. 

Ex Output:

1