We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

[EX Q]: Sent1: Only .06% of people who have killed kill again when they escape, are released, etc.
 Sent2: They support it because killing murderers is the right thing to do.
[EX A]: Not similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: Death is a much kinder sentence than life in prison, if you are sentenced to life, you should get to suffer for the whole bit.
 Sent2: If you get a life sentence, you shouldn't have any choices whatsoever.
[EX A]: Similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: That could be considered Cruel and Unusual Punishment, it could mess with the persons mind.
 Sent2: I think it could be proven that putting somebody in prison for life whent ehy have requested the death penalty is cruel and unusual punishment.
[EX A]:
Similar