We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Q: Sent1: And by the same token the anti-gun crowd believe that honest people can't be trusted, yet criminals can; unless there are laws that reinforce the Second Amendment right, which will make criminals more likely to get a gun.
 Sent2: That most people can't be trusted, so we should have more laws against guns, which most people will abide by because they can be trusted.

A: Not similar
****
Q: Sent1: The 2nd Amendment was put in to stop your guys from infringing on our Right to Keep and Bear Arms!
 Sent2: 2nd amendment: A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the RIGHT OF THE PEOPLE to keep and bear arms shall NOT be INFRINGED.

A: Similar
****
Q: Sent1: It's absurd to think that the Second Amendment was intended to protect a right to commit a crime.
 Sent2: It's also silly to argue that the Second Amendment only protects arms in common use.

A:
Not similar
****