We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

[EX Q]: It contends that, as recognized in Heller, the Second Amendment does not prevent the government from prohibiting firearms in sensitive places, which includes GMU's university buildings and widely attended university events.
[EX A]: Valid

[EX Q]: It was in no way illegal for a student to keep their legally owned firearms on school property while attending class and then go hunting after they were finished for the day.
[EX A]: Valid

[EX Q]: Civilians are held to much higer standards as far as liability goes than police officers are
[EX A]:
Valid