We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Example Input: Texas' system of capital punishment is less than a quarter the cost of housing a criminal for life.
Example Output: Valid

Example Input: If you're arguing for a general principle (eg that Capital punishment is acceptible and effective) then you have to argue in the general case:
Example Output: Valid

Example Input: I can't say a benevolent government produces benevolent people.
Example Output:
Invalid