In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

[Q]: Comment: Oh shit, they've caught on......NOOOOO! Well, time to go to the next city and shit all over it then wonder what possibly could have transpired?
[A]: Obscene


[Q]: Comment: Yes, your analysis is crap. Your first statement is apples and oranges. The Canadian soldiers don't have to sue to get their benefits (although Harper was headed that way). You haven't read the case so you have no clue what it was actually about. Finally, the "lefties" applaud getting the damn thing over with at a lower cost. Your problem was with the 3 previous governments, this part of things was inevitable. Harper (he did love losing at the Supeme Court)would likely have been stupid enough to fight it and triple the cost.
[A]: Obscene


[Q]: Comment: Damn, well, at least the Cubs are now a consistently competitive team when I lived 3 L stops away from Wrigley Kerry Woods' strike out record was as good as it got, or when Garry Sheffield and the Dodgers fought the fans in the stands for his HAT a drunk Cubs fan stole off his head ;)
[A]:
Obscene