TASK DEFINITION: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
PROBLEM: i would think that any legislator who kicks this can down the road would be kissing their chances for surviving this election cycle goodbye.  but what do i know.  we were stupid enough to elect these hacks.  we might still be dumb enough to give them another shot.  i consider myself a conservative independent, but i'll be damned if i'll vote for any incumbent republican candidate who isn't willing to stand up and deal with the problem this session.

SOLUTION: No

PROBLEM: Daniel, thanks for your reply.  I don't believe that the people that disagree with my opinion are "idiots" or have "mental issues".  I do however think that insulting people that disagree only ensures that they will not change their opinion.  I believe that most people that want laws designed to protect people from themselves have only good intentions.  In my opinion most of these types of laws look great on paper, just not in practice.

I live with chronic pain, I choose not to take pain medications because it would effect my work.  I am happy with my choice because its the right choice for me.  If the consequences of a persons choices don't have direct impact on my life, it should be none of my business what they do.  This doesn't mean I shouldn't share my concern for the person, just that I shouldn't be empowered to coerce their decision making.

I also think that a doctor/pharmacy shouldn't ever be forced to write/fill a prescription they don't feel comfortable with.

SOLUTION: No

PROBLEM: This wasn't date rape.  It was a guy raping the sickest, drunkest girl he could find.  She didn't know him and she was in no position to consent, and he knew it.

SOLUTION:
Yes