instruction:
You are given first 5 messages from a series of message exchanges between 2 persons playing the game of Diplomacy which is an American strategic board game. You need to generate the next message. The message should be generated such that it fits the context seen so far. Avoid the text that is (i) tangent to the context, (ii) repeats the context.
question:
['Hallo there my dearest Tsar! Still figuring this messaging system out haha', "France, what's up my friend?  Do I have anything to worry about from my neighbors?  Would you tell me if I did?", "Of course I would, and I haven't heard anything yet. I may have heard some plan involving taking out England early? Unsure 😉", 'I suppose you really wanted to be in burgundy! What’s next? Would you like assistance?', 'Assistance would be nice, depends what form it comes in though 😄']
answer:
Nicely done.  Do you plan on helping England against Germany?  If you'd like, the three of us could take down Germany together, and then you and I team up on England.  What are your thoughts on this general strategy?  If you agree, we can figure out the specific tactics as we go along.


question:
["Hey Turkey--just a word of advice (which may already be obvious to you), but now would be a good time to try and snatch Sevastopol with your black sea fleet, supported by your Rum army. Because Russia can't defend all three of Vienna, Warsaw, and Sevastopol, so you have like a 1/3 chance of getting to take it", "Thank you.  i think I would be guaranteed to take it.  Speaking of taking ... are you going to take Italy in the rear?  you're certainly gearing up for it.", 'Italy’s rear is none of your business 😉', 'well, it is when his front is all up in my  part of the med!', 'Hopefully you won’t have to deal with that for much longer']
answer:
No, I don't think so either.  He'll make a go for Smyrna, I'm sure of it.  If anything, S01 showed that he's a dot grabbing whore.


question:
['Greetings Russia!\n\nHow is it over there in the north? I feel that an France-Russia alliance is basically the best in the game. Of course, this is a bit more of a mid and late-game alliance, but there is no reason not to work something out rn. What do you think? Looking forwards to a great game\n\n-France', 'Absolutely, I think with the artificial time constraints in this game a three or four way draw is the most likely outcome, and as we share no direct spheres of influence I of course bear you no ill will. Hope to see you in the end game', 'Alright, looking forwards to it. Have you heard anything of italy, france, or germany? Just trying to gather some intel here 🤪', "Hi again Russia. I don't know about you but I would be interested in an alliance—our positions perfectly complement each other right now. I know that you and turkey have an alliance—but if you look at the last few years, it's clear that you haven't gotten anything out of this. In the first year of the game, you had 7 units, and were looking like you basically had the game. But once you made your alliance with turkey, you were all bottled up, and got no more builds. But now, your actually in a great place to stab turkey, with you fleet in Bla, and your armies in the Balkans. I think if we play this right, the game could practically be ours.", 'Excellent move!']
answer:

To be honest I'm not willing to betray trust with Turkey. I would be happy, however to see a 3 way draw in 1910 consisting of you, Turkey and I.