Categorize the comment on the basis of severe toxicity. If the comment is severely toxic output Yes, otherwise output No.

[Q]: The University owes the listeners of KWAX an explanation and an apology.  I cannot imagine KRVM or KLCC doing this - they are very transparent in this community. Despite their "ownership", the University of Oregon is acting like a bully in this case.  If you asked any of the listeners of KWAX if they ever expected this when they were contributing funds to support their "non-profit, listener supported" station, I'll bet the answer would be a resounding "no". Perhaps that is the UO plan - alienate the listeners. Even their responses to the reporter's questions were not transparent. I guess stations are no longer licensed to organizations as "public trustees." Those days are over.
[A]: No


[Q]: Holy crap, could this paper be anymore liberal?  How about reporting unbiased news.
[A]: Yes


[Q]: Agreed...I am looking for the list of representatives that voted for the $1000 cap - so I an make sure we vote them out! Because next time they will cap it at $500, then $250, then $0...we all know that is the plan....
[A]:
No