We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gay Marriage) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gay marriage. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gay marriage.

[EX Q]: They don't do it with shopping malls and basketball courts, or flashy presentations and pop music, they do it with ordinary, everyday witness to the values of Jesus Christ.
[EX A]: Invalid

[EX Q]: A valid argument against incestuous marriage would not have as its only premise "Marriage is defined as a legal bond between a man and a woman who are not x-apart related."
[EX A]: Valid

[EX Q]: Lambda Legal filed the lawsuit in March 2004 seeking marriage licenses for same-sex couples in New York, arguing that denying marriage to same-sex couples violates the state Constitution��_��__��_��__s guarantees of equality, liberty and privacy for all New Yorkers.
[EX A]:
Valid