In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

Input: Consider Input: Sentence: The table won't fit through the doorway because it is too narrow.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the doorway because the table is likely to be placed at a height where it will be blocking the doorway. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

Output: Wrong


Input: Consider Input: Sentence: Lily spoke to Donna, breaking her concentration.
 Reason: The 'her' refers to donna because Its about donna her concentration. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

Output: Correct


Input: Consider Input: Sentence: The sculpture rolled off the shelf because it wasn't anchored.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the sculpture because The sculpture was rolling; the shelf would not be level for the sculpture to roll. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 


Output: Wrong