We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Q: Sent1: If these bleak prospects aren't enough to deter someone from committing a serious crime, what will ramping it up to the death penalty do?
 Sent2: Death penalty are given to those who have comitted a very serious crime.

A: Not similar
****
Q: Sent1: Those are the only relevant ones, seeing as my argument is that the death penalty should be changed to life imprisonment.
 Sent2: Arguments that support the death penalty are the only ones that can reference the Constitution.

A: Not similar
****
Q: Sent1: By killing a person who murdered someone, you are just doing the same thing you are punishing him/her for.
 Sent2: You are probably going to murder somebody; hopefully it will b in a place with the death penalty and then you will get what you deserve.

A:
Not similar
****