Given a document, find the main entity about whom the author is writing. Write the full name if mentioned in the text. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

Q: Study author David Kaufman  director of Boston University's Slone Epidemiology Center   noted that ibuprofen and other NSAIDs are among "the most-used medicines in the U.S.
"[But] most NSAID use is over-the-counter "  he  added  "with users deciding what to take without involvement by health care providers."
 Kaufman  downplayed the notion that users might be popping too many NSAIDs to avoid using addictive opioid painkillers.
"My guess "  he  said  "is that while avoidance of opioids may influence prescribing decisions by doctors  it may not affect consumer behavior very much."
Instead   Kaufman  believes some consumers may simply decide to take an excessive number of pills â regardless of label instructions. But that behavior is "potentially modifiable with better education of users " he added.

A: David Kaufman
****
Q: The report on the investigation  which was conducted by a panel at Washington University into a study by Dr. Timothy R. Kuklo  was completed on Wednesday.
 Kuklo resigned his post at Washington University this summer amid a controversy over the study  which involved a Medtronic bone growth product called Infuse.
 Kuklo conducted the research in question while a surgeon at Walter Reed Army Medical Center in Washington. He became a highly paid consultant to Medtronic when he joined Washington University in St. Louis in mid-2006.
 In a report last year  Army officials accused him of inflating the number of combat soldiers whose leg injuries had been successfully treated with the product. Officials also found that he had forged the names of four Army doctors before submitting the study to a medical journal for publication.
 After a lengthy review  the Washington University panel concluded that it had been possible for Kuklo to support the number of leg injuries he reported if such injuries were defined broadly. The panel also raised the possibility that some of the data discrepancies had reflected problems in Walter Reed's patient record-keeping system.
Kuklo to support the number of leg injuries he reported if such injuries were defined broadly. The panel also raised the possibility that some of the data discrepancies had reflected problems in Walter Reed's patient record-keeping system.
 Seizing on that finding  Kuklo's lawyer sent a letter on Thursday to Sen. Charles E. Grassley  describing it as exonerating his client. Grassley  a R-Iowa  began an investigation of Kuklo's study after it was the subject of a Page 1 article in The New York Times in May.
 In his presentations to the panel  Kuklo maintained that he had included the other doctors' names as a courtesy and had not intended to mislead any one. But the committee disagreed  finding that Kuklo's decision to use four different handwriting styles to sign for the physicians suggested "intentional deception."
 The panel also found that Kuklo had committed research misconduct in representations he made about another study. As a result of the controversy surrounding his Infuse study  Medtronic suspended his consulting agreement.
 In recommending sanctions  the panel pointed out that Kuklo had already left the institution voluntarily. In its statement  Washington University said that his resignation was not being reconsidered.

A: Timothy R. Kuklo
****
Q: Former secretary of  state Hillary Clinton  speaks to and meets voters in Allendale  Mich.  on Nov. 7  2016. (Melina Mara/The Washington Post)
How do you write a primal scream? Because my head is about to explode over the story about alleged sexual harassment on  Hillary Clintonâs  2008 presidential campaign and  her  appallingly mild response  then and now.
To recap  while we were still reeling from the report that President Trump ordered the firing of special counsel Robert S. Mueller III last summer  the New York Times posted this: âHillary Clinton Chose to Shield a Top Adviser Accused of Harassment in 2008.â
According to the Timesâ Maggie Haberman and Amy Chozick  Burns Strider   Clintonâs  faith adviser â yes  faith adviser  you canât make this stuff up â was accused of repeatedly sexually harassing a young woman with whom he shared a campaign office. The Times: â She  told a campaign official that Mr. Strider had rubbed  her  shoulders inappropriately  kissed  her  on the forehead and sent  her  a string of suggestive emails.â
The campaignâs response? Campaign manager Patti Solis Doyle recommended that Strider be fired. So did Jess OâConnell  the national director of operations  who handled the investigation. And  Clinton  herself? Not so much  apparently. The young woman  not identified in the story  was moved to a different job. Strider â then married  by the way â was âdocked several weeks of pay and ordered to undergo counseling.â Which  predictably  he never attended.
And  even more predictably  when he was hired years later to oversee an independent group backing  Clintonâs  second presidential campaign  âHe was fired after several months for workplace issues  including allegations that he harassed a young female aide  according to three people close to Correct the Recordâs management.â
This is head-exploding stuff  but thereâs worse to come. Because now â now  after Harvey Weinstein and #MeToo and Roy Moore â this was Hillary Clintonâs belated response  in its bland totality: âA story appeared today about something that happened in 2008. I was dismayed when it occurred  but was heartened the young woman came forward  was heard  and had her concerns taken seriously and addressed.â
And classically  infuriatingly  this episode and its aftermath exposes  once again  the trademark Clinton failure to take personal responsibility; the allergy to owning up to error; the refusal to cede any ground  no less apologize; the incessant double-standarding  with different  more forgiving rules for the Clintons and their loyalists. Imagine a Hillary Clinton who said something like this:
Imagine that Hillary Clinton. She doesnât exist.

A:
Hillary Clinton
****