TASK DEFINITION: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.
PROBLEM: NY responds by arguing that their gun restriction scheme cannot get a fair test to prove its worth because gun runners evade the restrictions by going to other states with less restrictive laws to import the guns illegally.

SOLUTION: Valid

PROBLEM: These are the people that believe in bigger government, nanny states, government handouts, less responsibility for people, less freedom for the people, more laws, even more laws after that, legalizing all manner of drugs and behaviors while outlawing others, etc.

SOLUTION: Valid

PROBLEM: Now do you understand how the right of self-defense will be an integral part of any court challenge���and that you cannot simply say we are not going to include it in any discussion?

SOLUTION:
Valid