In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Ex Input:
Comment: If we go by the writer's logic, all cities should increase taxes on their rich, so high, that all the rich leave the city because as per the writer when rich will leave "Cheaper housing, fewer jerks. It’s a win/win". Listen to the writer, all cities throw out your rich. I hope the writer gets the sarcasm

Ex Output:
Non-sexual-explicit


Ex Input:
Comment: Better than being uninformed with a Trump sticker on your rump.

Ex Output:
Sexual-explicit


Ex Input:
Comment: Yuck! Why does everyone have to compromise to accommodate one or two students, that's my question? If one identifies as a woman, fine, but don't expect a bio-female to compromise her concerns to accommodate you (general) when you have a penis and want access to  females safe spaces ( shower stall/locker rooms).

Ex Output:

Sexual-explicit