We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

[Q]: Sent1: That doesn't ensure that we don't end up murdering innocent people.
 Sent2: The way I see it people who murder shouldn't be sentenced to death or spend life in the jails we have here there to nice.
[A]: Not similar


[Q]: Sent1: I support the death penalty, but feel there needs to be a better system of checks and balances to ensure each individual gets a fair trial using all evidentiary methods available.
 Sent2: There shouldn't be a death penalty it isn't fair.
[A]: Not similar


[Q]: Sent1: Can life imprisonment for a definite yes, prevent a murderer from killing again?
 Sent2: Killing the criminal would just make others angry, since there are other ways to take criminals out of the streets, like life sentences.
[A]:
Not similar