In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

[Q]: Comment: As you well know, Shore, because you like me have taken advantage of it, there are no "civil comments" criteria or screening process at the National Post.   And when mentally deranged characters like "Claude" ramp up the rhetoric with absolutely disgusting and obscene and unfounded libels about Harper or others, there is a tendency for others including me to shoot back.

Unlike yourself stalking me around multi-forums (an unhealthy obsession if ever there was one and frankly kind of creepy), I don't stalk you around and make copies of your posts.  Therefore, I can't entertain the folks here with some of your most outrageous and bogus blather from the far out Liberal side of the political divide.

Tell me, Shore, are you a paid agent of the Liberal Party or an old school chum with a secret crush on Trudeau or simply a pain in the derriere?

Inquiring minds want to know.

OK, on second thought they don't ... you are a nonentity with the shallowness of a birdbath for an anorexic sparrow.
[A]: Non-identity-attack


[Q]: Comment: So basically Doug is saying that the Christians who run the west with their War against Drugs, War against Sex, Sin , freedom of speech and even men are just as radical as the Muslims in the east with their intolerant attitude toward freedom of speech, gays, and women?
[A]: Identity-attack


[Q]: Comment: More white man shame.   We truly are God's damned creatures aren't we .
[A]:
Identity-attack