instruction:
In this task, you are given a passage which has a question and the context. You have to generate an answer to the question based on the information present in the context.
question:
Context: Most hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) are associated with cirrhosis. Portal hypertension (PHT) and esophageal variceal bleeding (EVB) can limit the patient's treatment options. Surgical therapy in such patients is challenging. We performed devascularization plus liver resection or radiofrequency ablation (RFA) to treat HCC patients with concomitant EVB resulting from PHT secondary to cirrhosis. Such combined operations have never been reported for the management of HCC patients with variceal esophageal bleeding.", 'To evaluate two different treatment regimens for patients with HCC and EVB.', 'We evaluated 35 BCLC stage 0/A patients with HCC and EVB who underwent either devascularization plus liver resection (Group A) or devascularization plus RFA (Group B). We reviewed the safety and outcomes of the two groups and assessed risk factors for patient survival and tumor recurrence.', 'Significant factors for overall survival were surgical approach and Child-Pugh classification. Child-Pugh classification was the only independent risk factor for overall postoperative survival [hazard ratio (HR) 8.320, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.739-39.799, P = 0.008]. Age was the only independent risk factor for tumor recurrence (HR 4.025, 95 % CI 1.343-12.062, P = 0.013).\Question: Is radiofrequency ablation plus devascularization the preferred treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma with esophageal varices?
answer:
RFA plus devascularization is the preferred treatment of HCC with EVB. RFA plus devascularization should be considered in Child-Pugh class A patients below 50 years of age.


question:
Context: We measured the effect of two weight adjusted i.v. doses (0.2 mg per 70 kg and 0.4 mg per 70 kg) of the potent opioid buprenorphine on analgesia and respiratory depression in healthy volunteers. The aim of the study was to compare buprenorphine's behaviour with respect to the occurrence of ceiling (or apparent maximum) in these typical micro-opioid protein-(MOP) receptor effects.", 'Ten subjects (5 males) received 0.2 mg per 70 kg, 10 others (5 males) 0.4 mg per 70 kg i.v. buprenorphine. Steady-state inspired minute ventilation at a fixed end-tidal Pco(2) of 7 kPa was measured before drug infusion and at regular intervals after drug infusion. Experimental pain was induced using transcutaneous electrical stimulation and a gradually increasing current. Pain tolerance was measured at regular intervals before and after drug infusion. The studies lasted 8 h.', 'After infusion of the drug ventilation showed a rapid decline and reached peak depression between 150 and 180 min after drug administration. This effect was dose-independent with respect to timing and magnitude. At peak respiratory depression minute ventilation was 13.1 (sd 1.8) litre min(-1) in the 0.2 mg group vs 12.0 (sd 1.3) litre min(-1) in the 0.4 mg group (n.s.). At buprenorphine 0.2 mg a small short-lived analgesic effect was observed with a maximum increase in pain tolerance current of 6.7 (sd 2.8) mA occurring at 75 min after drug administration. Peak analgesic effect was 29% above baseline current. In contrast, buprenorphine 0.4 mg caused a large and long-lived analgesic effect with a maximum increase in pain tolerance current of 23.8 (sd 7.4) mA occurring at 130 min after drug administration. Peak analgesic effect was 160% above baseline current (0.4 vs 0.2 mg, P<0.01).\Question: Does buprenorphine induce ceiling in respiratory depression but not in analgesia?
answer:
While buprenorphine's analgesic effect increased significantly, respiratory depression was similar in magnitude and timing for the two doses tested. We conclude that over the dose range tested buprenorphine displays ceiling in respiratory effect but none in analgesic effect.


question:
Context: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of fresh IVF/ICSI cycle outcome on the prognosis of the related frozen embryo replacement (FER) cycle.', '459 FER cycles, involving 2049 cleavage stage embryos with no or up to 10% fragmentation, were performed for which the outcome of the fresh cycle was recorded. The cycles were divided into two groups; group A included cycles in which cryopreserved embryos were obtained from fresh cycles in which conception occurred. Group B were cycles in which cryopreserved embryos originated from unsuccessful fresh cycles.', 'Groups A and B were comparable with respect to mean (+/- SD) age at cryopreservation (33 +/- 3.9 versus 33.2 +/- 4 years, P = not significant), mean number of oocytes retrieved and fertilized normally in the fresh cycle (11 +/- 5.2 versus 11.2 +/- 4.8, P = not significant) and mean age at the cryo-thawed transfer (34.5 +/- 4.2 versus 33.9 +/- 4 years, P = not significant). No significant difference was found between the two groups with regard to mean number of embryos cryopreserved (6.5 +/- 3.9 versus 6.2 +/- 3.6) and subsequently thawed (4.5 +/- 2.5 versus 4.5 +/- 1.8) per cycle and number of cryo-thawed embryos transferred per cycle (2.0 +/- 0.7 versus 2.1 +/- 0.8). However, the implantation rate per transferred embryo in group A was double that in group B (23 versus 11.2%, P < 0.0001). Moreover, the clinical pregnancy and ongoing pregnancy rates per cycle were significantly higher in group A compared with group B (34.8 and 27.3% versus 15.6 and 13.1%, P < 0.0001 and P = 0.0003 respectively). The difference in FER cycle outcome could not be explained by confounding variables.\Question: Do cryo-thawed embryos obtained from conception cycles have double the implantation and pregnancy potential of those from unsuccessful cycles?
answer:

After thawing, cryopreserved embryos originating from conception IVF/ICSI cycles achieve double the implantation and pregnancy rates of those obtained from unsuccessful cycles.