We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Input: Consider Input: Sent1: If gun control will not affect criminal ownership of guns and people will always be able to get a firearm if they want, why should a government make the effort to ban firearms as a precursor to atrocities?
 Sent2: If guns are banned, the only people that will be affected will be the people that buy guns for protection from criminals, who get their guns illegally anyway.

Output: Not similar


Input: Consider Input: Sent1: Ian brought up the point that guns make you more likely to kill a person.
 Sent2: You would rather be confronted by a guy with a baseball bat because you are FAR more likely to get killed by the guy with the gun.

Output: Not similar


Input: Consider Input: Sent1: Also once you become an agent of the government you stop having right, you have authorities and you're controlled by the people the Constitution is supposed to protect you against.
 Sent2: But now if you mention that you want to defend yourself against unfair actions by the government, it wouldn't ever hold up.


Output: Not similar