We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

[Q]: Sent1: If I ever "murder" someone without cause, I would deserve to die.
 Sent2: If a person commits murder, I don't believe they deserve to live.
[A]: Similar


[Q]: Sent1: Yes there should be a death penalty but it should only be used in extreme circumstances like treason, mass murder, ordering murders from within prison, and killing someone in prison.
 Sent2: If a person just raped someone (this is just an example) they shouldn't be killed for it, but something like a mass murdering or serial killing should be dealt with by putting them to death.
[A]: Similar


[Q]: Sent1: The reason to be for the death penalty is because it is just; the same foundation of support for all sanctions.
 Sent2: Is it reason to do away with the death penalty?
[A]:
Not similar