instruction:
Based on the given context, craft a common-sense question, especially those that are LONG, INTERESTING, and COMPLEX. The goal is to write questions that are easy for humans and hard for AI machines! To create such questions, here are some suggestions: A. What may (or may not) be the plausible reason for an event? B. What may (or may not) happen before (or after, or during) an event? C. What may (or may not) be a plausible fact about someone (or something)? D. What may (or may not) happen if an event happens (or did not happen)? You can also create other types of questions. DO NOT make your question answerable without looking at the context, or question of which the correct answer can be directly extracted from the context. DO NOT ask a question that requires very specialized knowledge that is not common sense. DO NOT ask too simple or too short questions. Your question must be related to the context and answerable with common sense. Try to add more variations and complexity to the questions.
question:
Context: You would go to fundraisers and events , and it was easy to spend a minute or two talking with various politicians , and they would always sound eager about whatever you were talking about . But when the event was over , and you tried to follow up , there was always that professionally elusive way that had of no longer being interested , or giving you a great reason why they ca n't do it now . That 's one reason I ' m not a big fan of politicians or bureaucrats for that matter , but I agree it 's a necessary evil .
answer:
Why would politicians seem eager about what the writer was talking about ?


question:
Context: And I do know that even long - established universities are money - making enterprises too ... I do n't know ! Internet - based universities just make me SUSPICIOUS . Like : " Yes , you too can become an expert in the field of communications at the University of Random City / Mythological Figure / Bob !.
answer:
How do I feel about internet based universities ?


question:
Context: The problem lies in the psychology of human judgment . Much research going back to the classic work by Kahneman and Tversky demonstrates that when people make a judgment about some topic with which they are not expert , they tend to use a strategy called " anchoring and adjustment . " First , people access a belief ( which serves as the anchor ) and then adjust that belief to take into account additional factors . This strategy is remarkably effective in most situations .
answer:

What if the classic work by Kahneman and Tversky was not written ?