In this task, you are given the abstract of a research paper. Your task is to generate a summary of this abstract. Your summary should not be very short, but it's better if it's not more than 30 words.

Example Input: We present a new unsupervised method for learning general-purpose sentence embeddings.
 Unlike existing methods which rely on local contexts, such as words
 inside the sentence or immediately neighboring sentences, our method selects, for
 each target sentence, influential sentences in the entire document based on a document
 structure. We identify a dependency structure of sentences using metadata
 or text styles. Furthermore, we propose a novel out-of-vocabulary word handling
 technique to model many domain-specific terms, which were mostly discarded by
 existing sentence embedding methods. We validate our model on several tasks
 showing 30% precision improvement in coreference resolution in a technical domain,
 and 7.5% accuracy increase in paraphrase detection compared to baselines.
Example Output: To train a sentence embedding using technical documents, our approach considers document structure to find broader context and handle out-of-vocabulary words.

Example Input: We present Cross-View Training (CVT), a simple but effective method for deep semi-supervised learning. On labeled examples, the model is trained with standard cross-entropy loss. On an unlabeled example, the model first performs inference (acting as a "teacher") to produce soft targets. The model then learns from these soft targets (acting as a ``"student"). We deviate from prior work by adding multiple auxiliary student prediction layers to the model. The input to each student layer is a sub-network of the full model that has a restricted view of the input  (e.g., only seeing one region of an image). The students can learn from the teacher (the full model) because the teacher sees more of each example. Concurrently, the students improve the quality of the representations used by the teacher as they learn to make predictions with limited data. When combined with Virtual Adversarial Training, CVT improves upon the current state-of-the-art on semi-supervised CIFAR-10 and semi-supervised SVHN. We also apply CVT to train models on five natural language processing tasks using hundreds of millions of sentences of unlabeled data. On all tasks CVT substantially outperforms supervised learning alone, resulting in models that improve upon or are competitive with the current state-of-the-art.

Example Output: Self-training with different views of the input gives excellent results for semi-supervised image recognition, sequence tagging, and dependency parsing.

Example Input: Given the variety of the visual world there is not one true scale for recognition: objects may appear at drastically different sizes across the visual field. Rather than enumerate variations across filter channels or pyramid levels, dynamic models locally predict scale and adapt receptive fields accordingly. The degree of variation and diversity of inputs makes this a difficult task. Existing methods either learn a feedforward predictor, which is not itself totally immune to the scale variation it is meant to counter, or select scales by a fixed algorithm, which cannot learn from the given task and data. We extend dynamic scale inference from feedforward prediction to iterative optimization for further adaptivity. We propose a novel entropy minimization objective for inference and optimize over task and structure parameters to tune the model to each input. Optimization during inference improves semantic segmentation accuracy and generalizes better to extreme scale variations that cause feedforward dynamic inference to falter.
Example Output:
Unsupervised optimization during inference gives top-down feedback to iteratively adjust feedforward prediction of scale variation for more equivariant recognition.