We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

[EX Q]: Sent1: You can't just assume the death penalty is a crime.
 Sent2: If you think there shouldn't be a death penalty, you're an idiot.
[EX A]: Not similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: The death penalty is about specific crimes, not any crimes.
 Sent2: The thing is, without the death penalty there is absolutely no deterrent from committing heinous crimes.
[EX A]: Not similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: The "Central Park Jogger" case involved a person who confessed who probably was guilty.
 Sent2: Only in severe cases where there isn't a doubt that the person is guilty.
[EX A]:
Not similar