The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.

[Q]: Context: 'Hello! I am very excited!🙂 How about you?' 'Yes!  Would you mind sharing your highest priority item with me?  My most valued item right now is Food actually' 'I am willing to share everything.'
Utterance: 'Awesome.  I would prefer getting 3 of my highest priority item though, and maybe you could get 3 of your highest priority item?'
[A]: No


[Q]: Context: 'Hello, I'm hopping I could grab most of the food, I have a lot of hungry mouths to feed.' 'Hi - I can understand that. I have quite a few mouths to feed as well' 'hmmm, well what are you looking to get'
Utterance: 'Well, I think that for us staying warm is more important than having extra food. What if I took extra fire wood and you took extra food?'
[A]: Yes


[Q]: Context: 'I really need all the food, I have a lot of people to feed' 'I will provide you the food, but I am asking only one for my people.' 'I am giving you all the water,  how come you need the food? '
Utterance: 'The main reason is to prevent us from cold.  Please provide three wood and three water.  If this is okay, then I will provide you three food.'
[A]:
Yes