In this task, you're given a context passage, followed by a question that needs to be answered. Based on the paragraph, you must write unambiguous answers to the questions and your answer must refer to a specific phrase from the paragraph. If multiple answers seem to exist, write the answer that is the most plausible.

Input: Consider Input: Casey's mom wanted money to buy a car. Casey sent home some money. 
Question: How would Casey feel afterwards?

Output: someone who cares for his mom


Input: Consider Input: If I am concentrating and focused I can make out 80 % of what is being said to me . This makes the show of nodding and saying " Oui " or " bon " almost convincing . Of course , the instant I spy a shiny metal object , my attention is dragged away from the speaker and I am lost once again . Terrance , however , makes real and authentic attempts to speak in French . 
Question: Why am I concentrating and focused ?

Output: Because I'm interested .


Input: Consider Input: If you're not expecting it , and it really doesn't go with the dish , it's bloody awful . I had sand whiting with Mediterranean stuffing . The stuffing was nice enough , and the fish was cooked well , but there was a bit of sinew or something attached that made it hard to cut through . I don't know if sand whiting is always like that , or they just didn't clean it properly , but I don't expect to need a steak knife to eat fish . There was no seasoning on the fish , and too much in the saffron broth ( which was more like a reduction ) that was poured over it . I assume they thought it would balance the dish out , but it didn't . 
Question: Why does the writer not expect to need a steak knife to eat fish ?


Output: Because fish is supposed to be soft .