In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Input: Consider Input: Comment: Justin is a devout Catholic, it's no wonder he believes the earth is flat and only 6000 years old.

If he's into cupping, perhaps he's into other forms of fakery.  Has he burned any witches at the stake recently?

Output: Non-sexual-explicit


Input: Consider Input: Comment: Ya know, I gotta say, I don't find it much comfort to hear that "well, other denominations are losing adherents too."  (As bad as the "well, other people abuse children too" with the implication that the hierarchy is somehow excused from the abuse and cover-up.)  The overall drift away from Catholicism and other Christian denominations suggests a bigger overall problem.  Christianity began and grew in the midst of a decadent secular Roman society, so frankly, it's not society's fault.  I can't help thinking too many supposed Christian leaders have become too wrapped up in trying to dominate society with secular power rather than leading by spiritual example.

Output: Non-sexual-explicit


Input: Consider Input: Comment: Not sure your details are right, but let's say they are.  Monica Lewinsky wrote about her love for Bill Clinton and the sex was consensual.  Adults can get up to crazy things best left behind doors.

Will never forgive Gingrich for making evening news impossible to watch with his Clinton peenis size and the kind of stuff you just wrote.


Output: Sexual-explicit