We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

[Q]: Well, if you believe that this is a 'natural right' it only applies to non-Catholics, and is conditional by the law.
[A]: Valid


[Q]: The medium of 'free speech' has changed, but that does not affect that free speech should still exist - just as with the other constitutional points (with a few exceptions, if you believe Bush).
[A]: Valid


[Q]: Everything else said is just a way to suck We the People out of our Constitutionally recognized, as Inalienable, Rights to Keep and Bear Arms!
[A]:
Valid