In this task, you will be presented with a context from an academic paper and you have to write an answerable question based on the context. Your questions can be extractive, abstractive, or yes-no questions.

Q: The dataset (composed of 2.6 GB of raw text) includes $421\,829\,960$ words divided into $17\,305\,401$ sentences.

A: How big is dataset used to train Word2Vec for the Italian Language?
****
Q: In this experiment set, our BERT implementation is compared to several systems that participated in the MEDDOCAN challenge: a CRF classifier BIBREF18, a spaCy entity recogniser BIBREF18, and NLNDE BIBREF12, the winner of the shared task and current state of the art for sensitive information detection and classification in Spanish clinical text.  However, attending to the obtained results, BERT remains only 0.3 F1-score points behind, and would have achieved the second position among all the MEDDOCAN shared task competitors. Taking into account that only 3% of the gold labels remain incorrectly annotated, the task can be considered almost solved, and it is not clear if the differences among the systems are actually significant, or whether they stem from minor variations in initialisation or a long-tail of minor labelling inconsistencies.

A: Does BERT reach the best performance among all the algorithms compared?
****
Q: We evaluate our model on two benchmark datasets BIBREF9 . The homographic dataset contains 2,250 contexts, 1,607 of which contain a pun. The heterographic dataset consists of 1,780 contexts with 1,271 containing a pun. We notice there is no standard splitting information provided for both datasets. Thus we apply 10-fold cross validation. To make direct comparisons with prior studies, following BIBREF4 , we accumulated the predictions for all ten folds and calculate the scores in the end.

A:
What datasets are used in evaluation?
****