In this task, you are given a part of an article. Your task is to generate headline (title) for this text. Preferred headlines are under fifteen words.

[EX Q]: We study truthful mechanisms for matching and related problems in a partial information<lb>setting, where the agents’ true utilities are hidden, and the algorithm only has access to ordi-<lb>nal preference information. Our model is motivated by the fact that in many settings, agents<lb>cannot express the numerical values of their utility for different outcomes, but are still able<lb>to rank the outcomes in their order of preference. Specifically, we study problems where the<lb>ground truth exists in the form of a weighted graph of agent utilities, but the algorithm can<lb>only elicit the agents’ private information in the form of a preference ordering for each agent<lb>induced by the underlying weights. Against this backdrop, we design truthful algorithms to<lb>approximate the true optimum solution with respect to the hidden weights. Our techniques<lb>yield universally truthful algorithms for a number of graph problems: a 1.76-approximation<lb>algorithm for Max-Weight Matching, 2-approximation algorithm for Max k-matching, a 6-<lb>approximation algorithm for Densest k-subgraph, and a 2-approximation algorithm for Max<lb>Traveling Salesman as long as the hidden weights constitute a metric. We also provide im-<lb>proved approximation algorithms for such problems when the agents are not able to lie about<lb>their preferences. Our results are the first non-trivial truthful approximation algorithms for<lb>these problems, and indicate that in many situations, we can design robust algorithms even<lb>when the agents may lie and only provide ordinal information instead of precise utilities.
[EX A]: Truthful Mechanisms for Matching and Clustering in an Ordinal World

[EX Q]: Alignment-free sequence analysis approaches provide important alternatives over multiple sequence alignment (MSA) in biological sequence analysis because alignment-free approaches have low computation complexity and are not dependent on high level of sequence identity, however, most of the existing alignment-free methods do not employ true full information content of sequences and thus can not accurately reveal similarities and differences among DNA sequences. We present a novel alignment-free computational method for sequence analysis based on Ramanujan-Fourier transform (RFT), in which complete information of DNA sequences is retained. We represent DNA sequences as four binary indicator sequences and apply RFT on the indicator sequences to convert them into frequency domain. The Euclidean distance of the complete RFT coefficients of DNA sequences are used as similarity measure. To address the different lengths in Euclidean space of RFT coefficients, we pad zeros to short DNA binary sequences so that the binary sequences equal the longest length in the comparison sequence data. Thus, the DNA sequences are compared in the same dimensional frequency space without information loss. We demonstrate the usefulness of the proposed method by presenting experimental results on hierarchical clustering of genes and genomes. The proposed method opens a new channel to biological sequence analysis, classification, and structural module identification.
[EX A]: A Novel Method for Comparative Analysis of DNA Sequences by Ramanujan-Fourier Transform

[EX Q]: Accurate, robust, inexpensive gaze tracking in the car can help keep a driver safe by facilitating the more effective study of how to improve (1) vehicle interfaces and (2) the design of future Advanced Driver Assistance Systems. In this paper, we estimate head pose and eye pose from monocular video using methods developed extensively in prior work and ask two new interesting questions. First, how much better can we classify driver gaze using head and eye pose versus just using head pose? Second, are there individual-specific gaze strategies that strongly correlate with how much gaze classification improves with the addition of eye pose information? We answer these questions by evaluating data drawn from an on-road study of 40 drivers. The main insight of the paper is conveyed through the analogy of an “owl” and “lizard” which describes the degree to which the eyes and the head move when shifting gaze. When the head moves a lot (“owl”), not much classification improvement is attained by estimating eye pose on top of head pose. On the other hand, when the head stays still and only the eyes move (“lizard”), classification accuracy increases significantly from adding in eye pose. We characterize how that accuracy varies between people, gaze strategies, and gaze regions.
[EX A]:
Owl and Lizard: Patterns of Head Pose and Eye Pose in Driver Gaze Classification