Given a document, generate a short title of the document. The title should convey the main idea/event/topic about which the document is being written. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

Q: Itâs not as if fake news in America came into existence alongside the tide known as the Trump presidencyâthe hucksters  foreign propagandists  conspiracy theorists  and fabricators have always been hereâbut if ever there was a year when purposefully misleading or false stories hit their stride  2017 might have been it.  We  were told that an ISIS leader was captured at a US airport  and that Shariah law was instituted in Utah and other states. A study found that 25 million votes for Hillary Clinton were âcompletely fraudulent â and the Las Vegas massacre was carried out by antifa  or ISIS  or the Illuminati  or somehow all three. The lies went on and on  picking up where 2016âs catalogue of nonsense left off. (Remember Hillary Clintonâs child sex trafficking ring run out of a pizzeria  or Sarah Palin banning Muslims from âenteringâ her daughter? How about Alec Baldwin dying  and Trump winning the electoral vote and the popular vote?)
But now  we âre at the dawn of a fresh year  privy to the forces that seek to sow confusion and outrage. Can American society overcome the fake news phenomenon?
Wellâ¦ âThereâs probably a strong case to be made that  we  are chemically addicted to fake news â says  Amy Webb   an author and futurist who founded the Future Today Institute. âWhen youâre seeing your angers and fears and anxieties being validated externally  you get a shot of dopamine.â Thinking about the upcoming year and beyond   she  says   we  may have âa huge problem on  our  hands.â And though the propaganda is coming at  us  from all directionsâfrom Kremlin-backed misinformation campaigns and Twitter troll armies to publicity hounds and political malcontentsâfalling for it  and spreading it  is to some degree our own fault.
In the spring of 2017   Webb  wrote a piece for Mother Jones that detailed not only the manner of 21st-century fake news and the speed with which it travels  but also how we are all accomplices to its proliferation âas we click and repost without considering the storyâs source and its agenda.â  She  noted that the democratization of the internet back in the 1990s meant that âeveryone would get to participate regardless of their agendas.â Information became free and free-flowing. But  problematically  âwe didnât plan ahead as the internet matured â when consumers of information were left to contend with not only âhuman arbiters of factsâ but also code and algorithms that propel certain types of content to the fore  based on our own online behavior. Innocently sharing a cat video put out by Russia Today  a Kremlin-backed propaganda machine that elevates fringe âexpertsâ and attempts to sow distrust  means youâll see a lot more of their content in the future.
Complicating matters more is that in our politicized climate  the term fake news itself came to mean different things to different people. It had a literal meaning that  seemingly overnight  became a hashtag and an epithet to hurl at anything or anyone that one disagrees with. âIf we canât even come to some kind of convergence and talk about something as insidious and as threatening to our future as the spread of misinformationâotherwise known as fake news in the literal senseâthen donât we have sort of a catastrophically huge problem on our hands?â asks  Webb .
As someone who studies current and past trends to try to anticipate what the future may hold   Webb  likes to end these conversations with a reminder that  for however doomed things appear  âWe are not living in the middle of Westworldâthe future has not been preordained. There is something we can do in the year 2018 and beyond  and that is be smarter consumers of news.â

A: Can American Society Overcome the Fake News Phenomenon? â Mother Jones
****
Q: Josh Stepakoff  was 6 years old in 1999  when a white supremacist opened fire on  his  day camp at the Los Angeles Jewish Community Center.
 Josh  was shot in  his  leg and hip. The gunman wounded four others  and shot and killed another man a few miles away.
"I remember playing capture the flag and I looked up and I saw somebody who was holding something at  his  hip. I thought it was a power drill " Josh  now 24  tells his father  Alan  at StoryCorps. "And then  the next thing I remember is getting up from the ground and running as fast as I could."
toggle caption Courtesy of  Joshua Stepakoff
He remembers that right after the shooting  Josh  was scared of helicopter sounds and loud noises.
"I think it was hard for me to wrap my head around the fact that this was not normal "  Josh  says. "I thought everyone had a hard time sleeping over. I thought everyone had hard times in the dark."
One of the most difficult things for Alan  he says  was he could never assure  Josh  he could protect him.
"You know  I could never put my arms around you and say 'Don't worry   Josh   I'll keep you safe ' because I couldn't. I just thank God every day you weren't killed " he says. "I don't know whether you've ever envisioned yourself as a family man  married  children. Would you tell this to your child?"
"I go back and forth with that. I think about it a lot  " Josh  says. "I think about my child's 6th birthday and what that will be like for me. I don't know."
 Josh  has a bachelor's degree in psychology and is now in graduate school working on  his  master's in clinical psychology. Does  he  see  himself  counseling other shooting victims?
"Half of me says yes and half of me says no  partially because I almost think that I won't be able to differentiate my life from theirs "  Josh  says. "But nobody tells you what to expect after getting shot  and so the other part of me just so badly wants to be a light in someone's life when they think it's dark."

A: What 'Don't Worry I'll Keep You Safe' Means When Your Child Survives A Shooting : NPR
****
Q: The officers told a public inquiry in British Columbia that they fired because they felt threatened by Dziekanski  who was holding a stapler  but Kennedy said he doesn't find any of the officers' statements credible.
 "The fact that the members met together prior to providing statements causes me to further question their versions of events " Kennedy wrote.
 Kennedy repeated his earlier recommendations that the force tighten its Taser policies and create an independent body to investigate officers in serious cases  such as those involving a death.
 Kennedy's recommendations aren't binding on the RCMP or the federal government.
 The commission's reports often include a response from the RCMP  but in this case Kennedy's findings were released without including the force's input.
 Kennedy's investigation  as well as several others including the public inquiry  were launched after the amateur video of the confrontation was made public.

A:
Canadian police critized for death
****