instruction:
Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
question:
That is quite an accusation - I would say that it sounds like you're someone who has no experience either in life or in the court system.
answer:
No


question:
Brought to you by SEIU 503, AFSCME, and all those other union corporations who represent the teachers, State bureaucrats, police, firemen, county employees, city employees, and University of Oregon employees.  

You know, the people who will benefit by "increasing public employment by 17,700" while "Oregonians with incomes of less than $21,000 would pay an additional $372 a year under IP 28" to support  their greed. 

 And who are least able to pay when ",low-income Oregonians would be hit the hardest, and there would be no exemptions for essential purchases such as food, utilities and pharmaceuticals."
answer:
Yes


question:
Wow. You lived here 36 years and all you've heard is tax, tax, tax? I've lived here 60 years and since the pipeline I haven't heard a peep about taxes. Until our current situation brought on by the low price of oil and the republican legislature over spending. See the LIO  for an example. But as long as the republican legislature keeps PP out of the classroom and guns in it, blah blah blah.
answer:

No