In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Comment: While I agree with the basics of your thought (the Legislature failed us), to think the chief thief would not have vetoed the PFD is foolishness. That man wants our PFD, and nothing will stop him. The Legislature could have hacked the budget with a light saber, and Walker would have still capped our PFD.
Non-sexual-explicit

Comment: The meaning of the slang aside, young men are virgins and women pop their "cherries" frequently with happy outcomes for all concerned. "Daddy" does not exclusively denote an actual father but more frequently alludes to an archetypical, and let's be honest here, Oedipal desire. 
In my opinion, the name has more to do with eroticism than sexual assault which is not at all "sexy". Dragging the name "Trump" into the discussion is definitely something that kills an erection--especially the female variety. Clearly, many heterosexual men have boners for Trump. Lol, what turns some men on intelligent women will never understand.
Sexual-explicit

Comment: What a stupid waste of time.

Fire them all. They are all stupid.

Non-sexual-explicit