In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Input: Consider Input: Comment: He's at least admitting that the best thing he can do is lick his own balls. Hasn't done much else except prove he' a liar.Good thing about it he's more like a poodle, they can lick their own balls plus other dogs too.

Output: Sexual-explicit


Input: Consider Input: Comment: Wish someone would grab Trumps pussy and toss him out of his plane midair

Output: Sexual-explicit


Input: Consider Input: Comment: The possible legal ramifications from Mr. Hammer's alleged actions have not been determined.  The evidence of those actions seems rather strong and acknowledging so is hardly a "personal attack."  The rifles were recoverd from a property owned and/or controlled by Mr. Hammer.  Just to clarify: a) rash verdict.......that's the responsibility of a judge or jury..to my knowledge, none has been reached b) accusations.....those were made first by the tenant, then by the legal authorities based on testimony from the tenant and evidence acquired via a Search Warrent and c) personal attack...I will gladly repeat that if Mr. Hammer is, indeed, guilty of the actions mentioned in this article,  it was really "stupid" for him to have taken the actions. If asked today, I'm guessing he would likely agree with me.


Output: Non-sexual-explicit