We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

Example Input: The civil rights violators claim they want to keep guns out of the wrong hands, when the truth of the matter is you and I "have the wrong hands"
Example Output: Valid

Example Input: Police are routinely armed with bullet-resistant armor, have a partner, can call for backup, and are able to carry large caliber firepower.
Example Output: Valid

Example Input: Gun owners and civil rights groups did have the tenacity to call it what it is...PRIOR RESTRAINT and unlawful abuse of a right to keep and bear arms and the accesories that go with it...specifically, ammunition.
Example Output:
Valid