Given the Question and Answer pair, detect whether the answer is acceptable or not. Denote acceptable answer as "yes", otherwise denote as "no". An acceptable answer is consistent with the context in question, detailed, long, and uses general knowledge of English. Answers that are not definite and suggest a variety of options are not acceptable answers.

Example Input: Question: I am watching a UK TV programme called "The Apprentice". The candidates have to sell guided tours. Some candidates are terrible at giving these tours. They fluff their lines, or they haven't researched, or they make up "facts". Watching their ineptitude cause a feeling of discomfort. What is the best word for this discomfort? The German word schadenfreude means roughly "the pleasure derived from the misfortunes of others". The word I want would be almost an antonym of schadenfreude - "the discomfort derived from the mosfortunes of others". Except not the misfortunes but the uselessness of others. 
Answer: I quite like cringeworthy to describe this. I feel it on a weekly basis watching The Apprentice but keep coming back for more! For example "James singing nursery rhymes on the coach was so cringeworthy". From MW so embarrassing, awkward, or upsetting as to cause one to cringe.
Example Output: yes

Example Input: Question: I am looking for a word that describes a person described in the description of the title. An example of such a person would be a person who comfortably passes the (easier) qualifiers and gradually performs even better as opponents get tougher in the final stages of a tournament. The person does not necessarily relax when he knows he can easily win, but "naturally" performs better as the stakes get higher. 
Answer: If the difficulty of the situation is due to competition with other people, then the person could be called competitive. Eager to do better than others in an activity, esp. trying to win in a sports activity:.
Example Output: no

Example Input: Question: Most grammar checkers are capable of detecting the the misuse of "your" and "you're"; providing the necessary correction. I'm curious though, is there any sentence that can be constructed where replacing "your" with "you're" keeps the sentence grammatically correct, but changes the meaning? If this is not possible, what grammar rules are in place that prevents these edge cases from occurring? 
Answer: Grammar is the difference between: knowing your shit and knowing you're shit Both are correct, but obviously have very different meanings.
Example Output:
no