Given a sentence, an entity and its sentiment towards the entity, verify if it is the correct sentiment towards the entity. Answer should be yes or no. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

Ex Input:
Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Samantha Bee is Positive . This is imbecilic. Let’s say I constructed a list  called “S***y Human Beings.” On that list were three people: Hitler  Charles Manson  and  Samantha Bee . Now  I think  Samantha Bee  seems like a rather s****y human being  but I’m obviously not saying that  she ’s a mass murderer. But  she  might be miffed to be placed in that company. The #MeToo movement has set no limits on what ought to be a career-ending or career-affecting offense. That’s not the fault of men. And it’s not even the fault of most women who find the #MeToo movement inspirational. It’s the fault of people like  Samantha Bee  who make excuses for conflation  then suggest that no conflation has taken place.

Ex Output:
no


Ex Input:
Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Kim Jong Un is Neutral . Itâs true that North Korea used to seek financial assistance in exchange for promises to restrain its weapons programs.  Kim  has changed all that. This isnât because of  his  ferocious and aggressive personality so much as it arises from the evolution of the North Korean regime and its political role in the world.

Ex Output:
yes


Ex Input:
Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Clinton is Positive . Even after that   Clinton    her  top campaign and DNC officials denied knowing they were paying for the dossier.  Former Clinton campaign manager Robby Mook  told CNN that  he  was unaware that the  Clinton  campaign was paying Fusion GPS.

Ex Output:

yes