In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: insult and non-insult. Insult is any lanugage or act that is disrespectful or scornfully abusive.

Example Input: Comment: Of course the Liberals would blame this on the CRA. While we were asleep at the switch someone else made this decision for us. Now that we're awake, of course, we don't agree with it. Time to throw the CRA under the train.
Example Output: Non-insult

Example Input: Comment: The 'Mooch' may have won A personal victory, but I have to wonder how much of A win it was for us in the huddled mass' community. Having two pi$$ed off political hacks (RNC/DNC, makes no diff) now able to drive MORE nails in the Republican coffin is truly A dubious 'victory'........................
Example Output: Non-insult

Example Input: Comment: The primary definition of a “weapon” is: “a thing designed or used for inflicting bodily harm or physical damage.”
A "lash" is the flexible part of a whip. A whip is primarily used to cause pain as punishment or as a stimulus to action. I suspect that Jesus wasn't intent on inflicting bodily harm on the moneychangers, and upsetting the tables may have scattered "the merchandise," but there was no physical damage.
Jesus "took the lash" to "stimulate" an examination of conscience: "It is written: 'My house shall be a house of prayer,' but you are making it a den of thieves.'" (Mt. 21:13)
Again, the one time a weapon -- a sword not a whip -- was wielded in Jesus’ presence, he clearly demanded, “Stop, no more of this!” (Lk.21:51)
Jesus "took the lash" once and then laid it down. He said, "I have given you a model to follow." We have taken and continue taking up arms to inflict bodily pain and physical damage. When will we follow Jesus example and lay down all weapons?
Example Output:
Non-insult