In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

[EX Q]: Comment: Wait a minute. That woman is perfectly able to talk about her "husband".  How do you know she is NOT Gay, and she is the female half?
[EX A]: Identity-attack

[EX Q]: Comment: Quote: "Michelle Obama is taking some heat for recent remarks she made on gender, but I'm struggling to muster outrage given the sheer incoherence of what she actually said."

True, I've rarely found what Michelle says coherent, but I suspect that what she's saying is primarily directed at black communities. She could have gone much further and bluntly stated that blacks coddle far too much the criminality and paternal irresponsibility in black males. (I won't call them men.) That's glaringly obvious and different from mostly white schools where ordinary boyishness is attacked as "toxic masculinity."
[EX A]: Identity-attack

[EX Q]: Comment: What a disgusting headline Globe!  "British-born man" when the man is a damn muslim and his name is Abu Izzadeen.

But you go with "British-born man"! You ARE the problem and there is blood on YOUR damn hands!! Other media even went with "of Asian heritage", because they too know DAMN well what the truth is!
[EX A]:
Identity-attack