We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Q: If I had my way, we'd have no death penalty except for rare cases, and have time in prison be cruel and usual with regular torture.

A: Valid
****
Q: Punishment as a concept DOES encompass killing as a possible form of punishment.

A: Valid
****
Q: Life imprisonment without parole is more effective than execution, and it is cheaper.

A:
Valid
****