In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: insult and non-insult. Insult is any lanugage or act that is disrespectful or scornfully abusive.

[EX Q]: Comment: Diversity in the homeless population, yep that's a goal worth shooting for.
[EX A]: Non-insult

[EX Q]: Comment: The self absorbed fool who destroyed the Progressive Conservative Party in Canada (reducing its power to 2 seats in the House of Commons) is now singing for his Narcissistic buddy who is currently destroying the Republican party in the USA.

These two really have much in common.

They definitely deserve each other
[EX A]: Insult

[EX Q]: Comment: Yep.  If someone who is remarried and comes to the Church and tells a priest that they cannot get an annulment for a whole host of reasons and is snidely told that they are welcome to tithe and be in Communion with the poors but please don't touch the good Catholic bread unless you vow never to have sex with your spouse again, then the correct response to that snide dismissal is to tell that person that you will go be in Communion with the poors over with the Episcopalians.  There is no reason to be Catholic if you can never receive Communion.  Why would anyone want to deal with this reactionary condemnatory mess when the Protestants are nicer?  

And the issue is that everyone is treated the same way so a worthy remarried person (like an abuse victim) is treated the same as Newt Gingrich.  In fact that worthy person is treated worse than a serial adulterer like Gingrich if he/ she cannot get an annulment for whatever reason.
[EX A]:
Non-insult