In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

Example Input: Comment: This Hitler argument is stale...arming people with military style weapons not only supports the crazy, it reflects our inability to understand why the vast majority of police favor the reasonable regulation of firearms ownership. They would also like to see regulation ammunition that's relates to the ability to kill them regulated. None of this minimal regulation would limit your freedoms...Canada has resonance gun regulations, Australia bans a number of styles of weaponry...they they both seem okay. The difference? Fewer gun deaths, fewer crazies with arms, and a clearer commitment to community safety. It's your children, our police, the neighbor down the street that desires reasonable consideration.
Example Output: Non-identity-attack

Example Input: Comment: the media and Reid is one of their ilk are masters of diversion and twisting of truth and in many cases outright fabrications.  the Mexicans are rapists is but one example
Example Output: Identity-attack

Example Input: Comment: So, what is your answer to mass murder using an arsenal of over twenty guns, some of which appear to have been modified for rapid, sustained fire? Had this man possessed only pistols, hunting rifles or shotguns, he could never have killed nearly sixty and been responsible for the injury of five hundred more. We need some common sense restrictions on certain types of guns, which are every bit as deadly as explosives in the hands of madmen and terrorists.
Example Output:
Non-identity-attack