The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the small-talk strategy, otherwise output No. small-talk is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used for discussing topics apart from the negotiation, in an attempt to build a rapport with the opponent. For example, discussing how the opponent is doing during the pandemic or sharing excitement for the camping trip.

[EX Q]: Context: 'Hello!' 'Hey there. How are you doing?'
Utterance: 'Great! What do you look for most when camping?'
[EX A]: Yes

[EX Q]: Context: 'Hello! I am happy to give you two of the waters and one of the fire wood. Would that work for you?' 'I could go for 2 of the waters-I get dehydrated easily so must have those. Would you consider 2 waters and 1 firewood?🙂' 'I would be okay with that, if I can have extra of the food?'
Utterance: 'I really don't need a lot of food when camping so I would be happy to agree to that!🙂'
[EX A]: No

[EX Q]: Context: 'Ok I'm sure we can work it out because I know I need extra water and firewood. Do you have any ideas on how to divvy up the extra supplies?' 'I would need some firewood as well, as I need it to cook the food. I was thinking maybe you can have all the water and I have all the food.' 'All the food is too much, I would need at least one package of the food for my group. I was thinking you could have 2 of the food packages and I have 1, then I get all the water and the majority of the firewood. That leaves you with 2 of the high priority food packages and a package of firewood to cook the food.'
Utterance: 'That seems quite unfair. I really would like my camping trip to be enjoyable.'
[EX A]:
No