Categorize the comment on the basis of severe toxicity. If the comment is severely toxic output Yes, otherwise output No.

Example Input: Basic economics. Is he capitalizing off of people's pain? Absolutely, and it is his right to do so as a Dr. to do so-he didn't get that expensive degree for nothing. He got it so he could go out and earn a LOT of money. A LOT of Docs do it for the money. This doc just DOESN'T sound like he's running roughshod to get there.
Example Output: No

Example Input: Jojoba oil seems to be the hot commodity right now. What the hell is a Jojoba? Anybody know?
Example Output: No

Example Input: I would agree when, and only when, the legislature gives up its salary padding.  During the regular session in Juneau, legislators get $235/day for lodging and food.  e.g. A recent House report shows that Rep. Reinbold paid $850 in rent plus $100 in utilities, a total of $950/month. Rep. Vasquez paid $650 in rent, plus $100 in utilities, a total of $750. Both legislators received about $235 per day, or $7,000 per month for room and board, meaning that each of them is receiving over $6,000- tax free- per month above actual lodging expenses.

Under the system approved by the legislature,  Juneau legislators gets 75% of the federal per diem rate, or about $175 per day- $5,000 per month of session- for living in their own homes.

Until that ends, any use of the PFD is a raid on the Permanent Fund.

p.s. Until the $700 million oil company "credit" goes away, ditto.  Why should they take an extra $700 million of our PFD's to pay for that?
Example Output:
No