In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Q: Comment: "It does seem a little hypocritical for Dogwood to be complaining about Kinder Morgan playing a role in the B.C. election through its donations to the BC Liberals, when it is receiving money from the United States to fight for causes aligned with interests there. "
In one case, foreign interests donate money to advocacy groups.
In the other, foreign interests donate money to a political party whose members currently form the provincial government. 
Not even remotely equivalent, Gary, and tf. hardly hypocritical of Dogwood to complain about it.

A: Non-obscene
****
Q: Comment: If these pipelines are successfully blocked we could be seeing the beginning of the  end for confederation as we know it.  It is not as if those against pipelines are actually acting as if they are concerned about the environment. They still want al the advantages  of oil. The store shelves would be empty without oil.  Then there are those that go home and heat their homes and cook using the dirtiest fuel  called wood and or biomass.  ( it should be BioMESS)

A: Non-obscene
****
Q: Comment: The move will expand Gerald Butt's control over the entire Federal governemnt.  When the happens,  nobody will be able to challenge Gerald Butts.  He is the first dictator of Canada.

A:
Non-obscene
****