TASK DEFINITION: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.
PROBLEM: Comment: I do not think any Canadian would mind a MOAB dropped on these traitors' heads.

SOLUTION: Non-sexual-explicit

PROBLEM: Comment: It's a couch.  It, and this story, and any and all hullaballoo is ridiculous and a perfect example of the MSM making mountains out of molehills to fit a political agenda.  

And besides, as many people have pointed out,  numerous POTUSs of the past (including Great Saint Obama himself) would commonly put their feet on the Resolute Desk.  

If Conway is showing a lack of respect or decorum for putting her feet on some random purchased couch that is barely a couple years old, then what does that say about Presidents who put their feet on a unique piece of American history?  I mean... that LBJ was sure a disrespectful POS, eh?  

Or is that just the narrative when it's a politico from a party you dislike?  Biased garbage.

SOLUTION: Non-sexual-explicit

PROBLEM: Comment: The men of Sodom didn't know Lot's guests were angels.  All anal sodomy was considered rape back then, because those being penetrated were not willing recipients, knowing what Scripture said about men lying with men.  The homosexual issue was made clear by Lot offering his daughters (knowing they were homosexuals) and the men rejecting the offer.  

Revisionist interpetation on your part.

SOLUTION:
Sexual-explicit