We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

[EX Q]: Sent1: No mortal man has the right to deny me the ability to maintain life within my body.
 Sent2: I for one would rather be able to defend my children without the risk of trying to overpower another person to keep the bat from hitting my children.
[EX A]: Not similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: People that read the 2nd amend as a militia thing also must think dangerous criminals will obey gun control laws.
 Sent2: This is just as unrealistic a view that saying gun laws will prevent all crime- of course some criminals will not obey the law- that is what makes them criminals!
[EX A]: Not similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: Gun hater pilot's lack of logic is to not allow law abding citizens the right to bear arms, and do nothing to protect the unarmed law abiding citizens.
 Sent2: It is asserted, therefore, that the D.C. gun control laws irrationally prevent only law abiding citizens from owning handguns.
[EX A]:
Not similar