We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

Q: If the Founding Fathers were referring to keeping and bearing arms for ANY legitimate purpose, they would have said so, in a SINGLE sentence or Amendment.

A: Valid
****
Q: Simple if gun haters want people defending the right to bear arms to be in militias, why would you want the militias to have lesser weapons then the enemies they are defending against?

A: Valid
****
Q: When the individual approaches a doctor and indicates that they wish to engage in business, they are not longer choosing to be left alone and unnoticed.

A:
Invalid
****