Given a document and an entity the task is to select the author's sentiment towards the entity. Sentiments can be Positive, Neutral and Negative. Select Positive if the article expresses a positive view towards the given entity or praises its quality or skills. Select Neutral if the document expresses no clear view towards the entity or has equal amounts of positive and negative statements or expressing some fact/quote by someone else. Select Negative if the article expresses a negative view towards like harsh remarks, criticizing entities action/decision etc. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

Input: Consider Input: What is the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Kim ? The impetus for the talks came in  Kim âs annual New Yearâs speech on January 1  when  he  proposed direct discussions with Seoul âover the issue of improving inter-Korean relations by our nation itself â with the goal to âdefuse the current military tension.â  Kim  also welcomed the upcoming Winter Olympics as a âgood occasion for demonstrating our nationâs prestige â and said  he  wanted to send a delegation.
But while the bilateral talks were widely praised in South Koreaâs media  the US media seemed like a deer caught in the headlights from the first announcement of the breakthrough. Unclear how to respond to a possible outbreak of peace  the press immediately zeroed in on the section of Kimâs New Yearâs speech where he declared that his ânuclear forces are capable of thwarting and counteringâ anything from the United States.  Kim  also reminded Washington that the ânuclear buttonâ is on  his  office desk âall the time.â
Although the Supreme Leader left out some of the harsh anti-US language heâs used in previous declarations  the implied threat became the story for nearly every US media outlet covering his New Yearâs speech. At CNN  for example  reporter Brian Todd went on the air to warn Wolf Blitzer that the prospect of talks was dangerous because it could mask a North Korean military attack during the Olympics. In some broadcasts  Kimâs offer to talk  and Moonâs quick endorsement  were barely mentioned.
 Kim âs reference to  his  nuclear arsenal also drew a typical response from President Trump.  He  took to Twitter to declare that  he   too  had a âbutton â but it was âmuch bigger & more powerfulâ than Kimâs.  His  childish taunt quickly led to speculation about  his  state of mind and fitness to be president  a topic that dominated the White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sandersâs first media briefing of the year.
Asked at a press briefing at Camp David about the potential for negotiations with Kim  he replied: âSure  I always believe in talking.â¦ absolutely I would do that.â Trump âappeared to be strongly indicating that he would join talks with North Korea after the high-level inter-Korean talks  if the conditions are right â South Koreaâs liberal Hankyoreh concluded.
In the lead-up to the talks in Seoul  the mood was close to jubilant. âHopes are high that inter-Korean relations will improve â Hankyoreh reported on January 4. âSince  Kim  delivered  his  New Yearâs address on Jan. 1  North Koreaâs actions have been completely aligned with the Southâs response.â
The pace was set early on by The New York Times  in a front-page story on January 1 posted literally hours after  Kimâs New Yearâs speech .  It  instantly became the leitmotif for media coverage throughout the week.
Behind Kimâs New Yearâs declaration âlies a canny new strategy to initiate direct talks with South Korea in the hope of driving a wedge into its seven-decade alliance with the United States â reported Choe Sang-Hun and David Sanger  the latter a recipient of dozens of US intelligence leaks about North Korea over the years.
In the Choe-Sanger article  the Times cited Robert Litwakâa senior vice president at the Woodrow Wilson Center for International Scholars who is well-known in Japan and Korea for his hard-right views on security issuesâto back its claim that Kim is seeking to âtake the side of the South Koreans  against President Trump.â He was then given a large block of space on the Timesâs January 3 op-ed page to spell out his grave concerns for the wayward South Koreans.
âWashington and Seoul should not take Mr. Kimâs bait â Litwak argued. âInstead  the North Korean offer should be put to the diplomatic test through a united Washington-Seoul front.â
Yet despite the clear signals of disapproval from US hard-liners   the Moon and Kim governments pressed on   saying  they  would soon embark on âworking-levelâ talks to discuss the details of the Northâs participation in the Olympics  the family visits  and âsolve bilateral issues among  themselves  without relying on outsideâ forces  according to the Joongang Daily.

Output: Positive


Input: Consider Input: What is the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Clinton ? Kellyanne Conway blasted  Hillary Clinton  for taking five days to come out with a statement about movie producer and Democratic mega-donor Harvey Weinstein following growing allegations that he'd been sexually assaulting women for years.
Further  said Conway   Clinton   as far as anyone knows  "kept the dirty money that dirty Harvey has given her in her campaign."
But now  even if  Clinton  gives back the money  that would not make  her  look any better  said Conway.
"First of all  she  doesn't need to mollify me  but not be a hypocrite about women's empowerment " Conway said. " She  spent a month this time last year talking about an audio tape from 11 years earlier where a statement was made by the now president of the United States . . . what has  she  done privately in  her  private life?  She  is talking about  herself  and a campaign  she  lost on a book tour.  She  is not trying to help victims of sexual assault."
Conway invited Clinton to call  her  at the White House  if  she  wishes  to discuss the issue.
" She  knows the number "  she  said. " She  was the first lady for eight years and worked in a bipartisan fashion on sexual assault. We don't hear that from  her ."

Output: Positive


Input: Consider Input: What is the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Steve Bannon's ? Steve Bannon's  controversial comments included in a new tell-all book about the Trump administration cost him any chance of returning to the White House  a spokesman said Monday.
Deputy press secretary Hogan Gidley told reporters on Air Force One  Bannon 's derogatory remarks about President Donald Trump  members of his family  and his presidency as a whole were damaging.
"I don't believe there is any way back for  Mr. Bannon  at this point " White House deputy press secretary Hogan Gidley said  according to The Washington Times. "It is very obvious  Mr. Bannon  worked with [author Michael] Wolff in this particular book."
Wolff's book "Fire and Fury: Inside the Trump White House" was released Friday. It frames the early days of the Trump administration as chaotic  and  Bannon  is quoted several times bashing Trump.
"When you go after somebody's family in the matter which [ Bannon ] did  two of the president's children are serving this nation  sacrificing in their service  it is repugnant  it is grotesque  and I challenge anybody to go and talk about somebody's family and see if that person doesn't come back and comes back hard."
 Bannon  addressed  his  remarks on Sunday  saying  in part  "Donald Trump  Jr. is both a patriot and a good man.  He  has been relentless in  his  advocacy for  his  father and the agenda that has helped turn our country around. My support is also unwavering for the president and  his  agenda — as I have shown daily in my national radio broadcasts  on the pages of Breitbart News and in speeches and appearances from Tokyo and Hong Kong to Arizona and Alabama."


Output: Neutral