TASK DEFINITION: Given a document, an entity and its sentiment towards the entity, verify if it is the correct sentiment towards the entity. Answer should be yes or no. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].
PROBLEM: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Charles Taylor is Neutral . Sirleaf  70  acknowledged before the commission in February that she gave up to $10 000 to a rebel group headed by Charles Taylor. Sirleaf said the money she sent while an expatriate was meant for humanitarian services and that she was never a member of the group  the National Patriotic Front.
 Information Minister Laurence Bropleh said Monday evening if the public had had any dissatisfaction with Sirleaf's involvement with Taylor at the time  they would have voted against her in 2005.
 In 2005 the Liberian people knew that President Sirleaf had contributed $10 000 to Taylor's movement  Bropleh said.
 An AP correspondent and others who covered the Liberian war can recall no humanitarian works by Taylor and his fighters  especially in the first months of the war when tens of thousands of refugees were fleeing across the borders to Ivory Coast and Guinea  where they were helped by international and government agencies.
 Then  most atrocities were committed by Doe's forces and Taylor was welcomed as a liberator fighting a barbaric dictatorship.
 "In defense of Ellen Johnson Sirleaf  she never hid the fact that she was curious about Taylor and what he was all about " said Huband  who drove with Johnson Sirleaf on her first trip to meet Taylor in May 1990. "A lot of people supported the idea of Doe being ousted and there had been so many attempts  and they all were foiled  at least one with the help of the American government  which continued to support Doe despite his brutality."
 "I never had the impression that Sirleaf supported Taylor  certainly not after it became clear his troops were out of control " Huband said. "Certainly there was no way she could predict the kind of atrocities that would be committed (by Taylor's fighters) ..."

SOLUTION: no

PROBLEM: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Creep Harvey Weinstein is Positive . Two decades ago  the Hollywood producer  Harvey Weinstein  invited Ashley Judd to the Peninsula Beverly Hills hotel for what the young actress expected to be a business breakfast meeting. Instead  he had her sent up to his room  where he appeared in a bathrobe and asked if he could give her a massage or she could watch him shower  she recalled in an interview.
In 2014   Mr. Weinstein  invited Emily Nestor  who had worked just one day as a temporary employee  to the same hotel and made another offer: If she accepted his sexual advances  he would boost her career  according to accounts she provided to colleagues who sent them to Weinstein Company executives. The following year  once again at the Peninsula  a female assistant said  Mr. Weinstein  badgered her into giving  him  a massage while  he  was naked  leaving her âcrying and very distraught â wrote a colleague  Lauren OâConnor  in a searing memo asserting sexual harassment and other misconduct by their boss.
 Harvey  isn't denying the allegations made by a number of women  saying in a statement  "I appreciate the way Iâve behaved with colleagues in the past has caused a lot of pain  and I sincerely apologize for it. Though Iâm trying to do better  I know I have a long way to go."
But  Harvey  isn't just a movie guy   he 's also a massive donor to the Democrat Party. One of  his  big recipients? Hillary Clinton. In fact   he  was a fundraising bundler for her 2016 campaign.
The RNC has called on Democrats who have received "dirty" money from  Weinstein  to return it.
"During three-decades worth of sexual harassment allegations   Harvey Weinstein  lined the pockets of Democrats to the tune of three quarters of a million dollars. If Democrats and the DNC truly stand up for women like they say they do  then returning this dirty money should be a no brainer " RNC Chairwoman Ronna Romney-McDaniel said Friday.

SOLUTION: no

PROBLEM: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Tesla is Negative . Tesla Motors developed a giant backup power system in South Australia to combat the region's energy crisis  and switched on  the battery  on Dec. 1. (Jay Weatherill via Storyful)
Less than a month after  Tesla  unveiled a new backup power system in South Australia  the world's largest lithium-ion battery is already being put to the test. And it appears to be far exceeding expectations: In the past three weeks alone  the Hornsdale Power Reserve has smoothed out at least two major energy outages  responding even more quickly than the coal-fired backups that were supposed to provide emergency power.
 Tesla 's battery last week kicked in just 0.14 seconds after one of Australia's biggest plants  the Loy Yang facility in the neighboring state of Victoria  suffered a sudden  unexplained drop in output  according to the International Business Times. And the week before that  another failure at Loy Yang prompted  the Hornsdale battery  to respond in as little as four seconds â or less  according to some estimates â beating other plants to the punch. State officials have called the response time âa record â according to local media.
The effectiveness of  Tesla 's battery is being closely watched in a region that is in the grips of an energy crisis. The price of electricity is soaring in Australia  particularly in the state of South Australia  where a 2016 outage led 1.7 million residents to lose power in a blackout. Storms and heat waves have caused additional outages  and many Australians are bracing for more with the onset of summer in the Southern Hemisphere.
The Hornsdale battery system  which uses the same energy-storage tech found in  Tesla 's electric cars  is one of chief executive Elon Musk's newest projects. In March  Musk  who is known for setting high goals and only sometimes meeting them  vowed on Twitter to deliver a battery system for South Australia's struggling grid within 100 days or it would be free. By early July  the state had signed a deal with  Tesla  and the French-based energy company Neoen to produce the battery. And by Dec. 1  South Australia announced that it had switched on the Hornsdale battery.
A spokesman for  Tesla  didn't immediately respond to a request for comment.
Nonetheless  the Hornsdale reserve has already shown that it can provide what's known as âcontingencyâ service â keeping the grid stable in a crisis and easing what would otherwise be a significant power failure. And  more important  the project is the biggest proof-of-concept yet that batteries such as  Tesla 's can help mitigate one of renewable energy's most persistent problems: how to use it when the sun isn't shining or the wind isn't blowing.
Where it can take as much as 10 minutes to spin up a traditional turbine in a pinch  added Coughlin  it's not uncommon to see systems such as  Tesla 's intervene in fractions of a second.
This isn't Musk's only experiment with large-scale batteries. Last year   Tesla  said  it  had equipped a small island in American Samoa with thousands of solar panels and batteries that could serve the area's 600 inhabitants  shifting them almost entirely off fossil fuels. In October  Musk responded to the hurricane crisis in Puerto Rico by offering to discuss building a solar grid for the island. Parts of Puerto Rico are still without power  months after Hurricane Maria ripped down power lines and other energy infrastructure.

SOLUTION:
no