In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Input: Consider Input: Comment: It's just goddamn beyond everything.  
What's it mean? What's it leading to?

  You know, if you'd have told me 20 years ago.
I'd see children walking the streets of our Texas towns..with green hair, bones in their noses...

 I just flat-out
wouldn't have believed you.

 Signs and wonders.

 But I think once you quit hearing "sir"
and "ma'am," the rest is soon to foller.

  Oh, it's the tide.
- Yeah.

 It's the dismal tide.
It is not the one thing.

Not the one thing.

~ from world weary Sheriff  Ed Tom Bell ( Tommy Lee Jones ) in conversation with a fellow older lawman in "No Country For Old Men"

the funny thing about many people Black Swan is that they only use the frog in the slowly boiling pot analogy when it suits them...

Output: Obscene


Input: Consider Input: Comment: Correct  me if I am wrong, but following criticism in these comments, I no longer see the perp described as a "white man" in this story.

(However, he continues to be described as a"white man" in a related story here.)

Let me know whether I just missed the white descriptor on second reading.

Output: Non-obscene


Input: Consider Input: Comment: Lock him up for 30 days, he's gonna get some innocents killed with this vigilante shit.


Output: Obscene