In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Comment: Who pays you for this drivel?
Non-obscene

Comment: Without going through the legal channels to change how the pay out is done, this is flat out illegal. 

So instead of local businesses and citizens infusing and stimulating OUR economy, he wants to pour 700M into a bucket with holess in it.

Blatant thievery. Gov. Walker.

You shame the office of Govenor and Alaska. You are guilty of HURTING the innocent and poor and taking that which does not belong to you to take.
Non-obscene

Comment: It'll be interesting to see how this plays out.  In a rational world, owners/stockholders/league would have promptly and ruthlessly enforced a "no politics on the playing field" rule, left or right.  They didn't, and now they're pointedly choosing sides.  I suspect, they should've taken a hard look at an electoral map first.  They need Trump supporters, far more than Trump supporters need them.  Pro sports is business and entertainment, first and last.  First rule...don't alienate your customers.  Second rule...don't start crap, where there doesn't need to be crap.  They're failing at both rules.

Obscene