We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Ex Input:
If you're arguing for a general principle (eg that Capital punishment is acceptible and effective) then you have to argue in the general case:

Ex Output:
Valid


Ex Input:
Very true, yet as the debate asks, should it be outlawed, I support no because it has it's benefits if fixed.

Ex Output:
Valid


Ex Input:
Since I started the thread, I permit this slight perversion to learn these guys beliefs.

Ex Output:

Invalid