The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.

[Q]: Context: 'Okay I am willing to take your offer as I think you need the firewood more than me and I could use the extra water for hygiene related issues.' 'Thank you! I am grateful! ' 'You are very welcome!'
Utterance: 'I'm looking forward to this camping trip now knowing that we will have enough firewood to last🙂'
[A]: No


[Q]: Context: 'i think i should have 2 waters because i will need to put the fire out to protect the forest.' 'Well, if we can't settle on an agreement i'm going to walk away. We agreed I will get all 3 extra packages of the food but I still wish for the 2 extra wood and 2 extra waters' 'no we agree that you would get 3 food, i would get 3 waters'
Utterance: 'It's agreed, I will get 3 extra packs of food, you will get 3 waters but the extra wood for my kids is needed how about I get 2 extra firewood?'
[A]: Yes


[Q]: Context: 'With the cool weather in degrees lower than expected, my family of 7 are consuming firewood faster than expected. Thus, I would like all the firewood in exchange for the food' 'Oh ok, that will be great. How about the water? Is 2 for me and 1 for you ok?' 'How about 2 for me 🙂'
Utterance: 'I have 3 kids with me who are always thirsty but we can negotiate for it'
[A]:
Yes