In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

Input: Consider Input: Comment: Can someone please tell me on what basis analysts keep saying that the secret ballot will fail to remove Zuma? ANC MPs are well aware that Zuma is using State Intelligence to spy on them, so they'd be too paranoid to tell anyone if they intend to vote against Zuma.

It is the ANC's interest to remove Zuma. Opposition parties are getting political mileage everyday Zuma remains in power and everytime the ANC caucus fails to vote against him the votes of no confidence. There best chance of retaining power in 2019 is to remove Zuma now, as this will effectively end Dlamini Zuma's campaign, they can unite around Rhamaposa and focus on the ANC 2019 campaign. Do analsyts not see this, or do they really believe that ANC MPs are too politically naive not to see this?

No one of significance in the ANC is going to openly admit that Zuma might lose this vote, or that voting Zuma out is in the best interest of the ANC. They're politicians, not idiots. Analsysts need to read between the lines!

Output: Non-identity-attack


Input: Consider Input: Comment: Just so you know... Another cop, a white woman this time, catapulted out of bed, found four or five steroid monsters to help and murdered another UNARMED black man for doing what he was told. Today. In Tulsa, that bastion of civil rights which has NEVER had problems unless you count 80 years of white people killing blacks.

Go ahead and hate rate me. It will simply show I'm right.

Output: Identity-attack


Input: Consider Input: Comment: "What's the matter with your world?"

Sessions is a closet transgender.


Output: Identity-attack