We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Q: But people who act in the heat of a moment, who don̢���t predetermine to take lives or do harm, they are at least excused from the death penalty for not having put rational thought into the matter.

A: Valid
****
Q: Second, if the situation were turned, you would probably say "Purposely indulging in an act that carries risk to your own body for your own convenience and then committing suicide" if we were talking about peds.

A: Invalid
****
Q: But the electric chair the time your on it depends on voltage and would be very painful

A:
Valid
****