In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: threat and non-threat. Threat is a statement that someone will be hurt or harmed, especially if the person does not do something in particular.

Example Input: Comment: I only go by the words you write on this forum. If I am wrong in any way, I apologize. But prison is not the place to put severely mentally ill persons.
Example Output: Non-threat

Example Input: Comment: Isn't Rush the (other) big fat lying idiot complaining that warnings about Irma are sensationalism and people should generally not listen?

"Left" is wingnut speak for "rational" and "fact-based." Reality is facts that still remain facts even if you don't believe in them; all else is opinion.  And Rush deals solely in opinion.
Example Output: Non-threat

Example Input: Comment: This is an awesome program.  I'd join but I already know how Everett city government works as follows:

**Pander to preferred voting blocks at all times
**Set up endless commissions and work groups to study current issues without getting anything done
**Constantly talk about vague feel good programs as if they're reality
**Deflect criticism by pointing fingers at everyone else
**Spend money as if there's a money tree out in the city plaza with an endless supply of cash
**Raise taxes whenever humanly possible
**Put "low barrier housing" smack dab in the middle of neighborhoods without allowing for comment
**When citizens object, treat them like they're stupid because they don't understand the nuances of "helping" people who can't figure out how to support themselves
**When all else fails, blame Trump or big pharma
**Block attempts to elect council members by district to protect current council positions
**Follow the liberal playbook at all times, no matter who it hurts
Example Output:
Non-threat