In this task, you're given a statement, and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence clearly disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3' corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.

Ex Input:
Statement: In retrospect, Clinton appears to have shrewdly pitted the Ickes group against Morris as an exercise in the management style FDR called creative tension. Choices:  1. It appears that Clinton used a clever tactic that FDR called creative tension. 2. Clinton often used the management style called 'creative tension'. 3. Franklin Roosevelt never used the term 'creative tension'.

Ex Output:
3


Ex Input:
Statement: The name did not stick, and had Captain Cook known his fate, he would not have stuck around either. Choices:  1. Captain cook wanted to die.  2. Captain cook would have stayed even if he knew his fate.  3. Captain cook would have left if he knew his fate. 

Ex Output:
2


Ex Input:
Statement: Not for poisoning Mrs. Inglethorp? Choices:  1. This isn't to poison Mrs. Inglethorp? 2. So even though this is something that could kill her, and we want to kill her, this isn't to poison Mrs. Inglethorp? 3. This is to poison Mrs. Inglethorp, got it?

Ex Output:

3