We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Because they love to butt-fuck and they're usually pro-capitol punishment.
Valid

So I argue that 3000 years of use does provide evidence that capital punishment works.
Valid

The government does not have the right to kill people.

Valid