In this task, you are given text for US Congressional and California state bills, your task is to generate a summary for this bill.

Ex Input:
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Child Abuse Reform and Enforcement 
Act of 2005'' or ``CARE Act of 2005''.

    TITLE I--WITHHOLDING AND REDISTRIBUTION OF CERTAIN STATE CHILD 
                            PROTECTION FUNDS

SEC. 101. WITHHOLDING AND REDISTRIBUTION OF STATE FUNDS.

    (a) Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act.--Beginning 1 year 
after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Health 
and Human Services shall reduce, by 25 percent, the allocation to a 
State for a fiscal year under title I of the Child Abuse Prevention and 
Treatment Act that does not meet each of the requirements of title II 
of this Act.
    (b) National Child Protection Act of 1993.--Beginning 1 year after 
the date of the enactment of this Act, the Attorney General shall 
reduce, by 25 percent, amounts under a grant under section 4(b) of the 
National Child Protection Act of 1993 to a State for a fiscal year that 
does not meet each of the requirements of title II of this Act.
    (c) Redistribution of Funds.--The Attorney General shall, using 
funds withheld under this section and amounts appropriated pursuant to 
the authorization of appropriations under section 102, provide grants 
to States that meet the requirements of title II of this Act. A grant 
made under this subsection shall be used--
            (1) for the computerization of data and criminal history 
        files for purposes of title II of this Act;
            (2) for the improvement of existing data and computerized 
        criminal history files for purposes of title II of this Act; 
        and
            (3) to assist the State in the transmittal of data and 
        criminal records to, or the indexing of data and criminal 
        history records in, the national data and criminal history 
        systems for purposes of title II of this Act.

SEC. 102. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS FOR ADDITIONAL FUNDING GRANTS 
              FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF CHILD ABUSE CRIME INFORMATION.

    There are authorized to be appropriated for additional grants under 
section 101(c) $50,000,000 for each of the fiscal years 2006 through 
2009.

     TITLE II--CHILD SEXUAL ABUSE PROTECTION AND SENTENCING REFORM

SEC. 201. REQUIREMENT TO EQUALIZE SENTENCING REQUIREMENTS FOR 
              INTRAFAMILIAL AND EXTRAFAMILIAL CHILD SEXUAL ABUSE.

    (a) State Study of Laws Regarding Intrafamilial and Extrafamilial 
Child Sexual Abuse.--A State meets the requirements of this subsection 
if, not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the 
State--
            (1) has studied the laws in the State that apply to 
        intrafamilial and extrafamilial sexual abuse of children; and
            (2) has examined, at a minimum--
                    (A) issues concerning differences in laws 
                applicable to intrafamilial and extrafamilial child 
                sexual abuse;
                    (B) issues concerning disparities in charging and 
                sentencing perpetrators of child sexual abuse, 
                resulting from differences in applicable laws; and
                    (C) issues concerning legislative actions necessary 
                to equalize charging and sentencing of perpetrators of 
                sexual abuse without regard to familial relationship of 
                perpetrator to child victim.
    (b) Report to the Attorney General.--A State meets the requirements 
of this subsection if the State submits to the Attorney General a 
report that contains the results of the study conducted under 
subsection (a).
    (c) Legislative Actions to Equalize Sentencing Requirements.--
            (1) In general.--Except as provided in paragraph (2), a 
        State meets the requirements of this subsection if, not later 
        than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the State 
        has implemented legislative actions necessary to equalize 
        charging and sentencing of perpetrators of sexual abuse without 
        regard to familial relationship of perpetrator to child victim.
            (2) Exception.--The Attorney General may provide for an 
        extension of the 1-year time requirement in paragraph (1) for 
        any State if the Attorney General determines that State 
        legislation (other than legislation appropriating funds) is 
        required to meet the additional requirements imposed by this 
        Act.

SEC. 202. REQUIREMENT TO GATHER INFORMATION ON SEXUAL ABUSE OF 
              CHILDREN.

    A State meets the requirements of this section if the State--
            (1) compiles and analyzes data relating to intrafamilial 
        and extrafamilial sexual abuse of children;
            (2) promotes regulations requiring the gathering of such 
        data by State courts and State agencies for compilation and 
        analysis purposes;
            (3) provides, on an annual basis, to the Attorney General, 
        the Secretary of Health and Human Services, and the Bureau of 
        Justice Statistics a report containing the data referred to in 
        paragraph (1) and a description of the regulations referred to 
        in paragraph (2).

Ex Output:
Child Abuse Reform and Enforcement Act of 2005 - CARE Act of 2005 - Directs the Secretary of Health and Human Services and the Attorney General to reduce by 25 percent certain fiscal year allocations and grant amounts, under the Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act and the National Child Protection Act of 1993, respectively, to any state that is not in compliance with requirements of this Act.

Directs the Attorney General to use such withheld amounts and authorized funds under this Act for additional grants to states in compliance to computerize, improve, transmit, and index their own data and criminal history files in the national data and criminal history systems for child sexual abuse protection and sentencing reform.

Requires a state, to be eligible for funding under this Act, to: (1) study its laws pertaining to intrafamilial and extrafamilial sexual abuse of children, and examine issues concerning their differences; (2) examine disparities in charging and sentencing perpetrators of child sexual abuse; (3) examine, and implement, legislative actions necessary to equalize charging and sentencing without regard to familial relationship of perpetrator to child victim; (4) compile, analyze, and report relevant data; and (5) promote regulations requiring its courts and agencies to compile such data.


Ex Input:
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Community Building Code 
Administration Grant Act of 2007''.

SEC. 2. GRANT PROGRAM AUTHORIZED.

    (a) Grant Authorization.--The Secretary of Housing and Urban 
Development shall provide grants to local building code enforcement 
departments.
    (b) Competitive Awards.--The Secretary shall award grants under 
subsection (a) on a competitive basis pursuant to the criteria set 
forth in section 6, but also taking into consideration the following:
            (1) The financial need of each building code enforcement 
        department.
            (2) The benefit to the local jurisdiction of having an 
        adequately funded building code enforcement department.
            (3) The demonstrated ability of each building code 
        enforcement department to work cooperatively with other local 
        code enforcement offices, health departments, and local 
        prosecutorial agencies.
    (c) Maximum Amount.--The maximum amount of any grant awarded under 
this section shall not exceed $1,000,000.

SEC. 3. REQUIRED ELEMENTS IN GRANT PROPOSALS.

    In order to be eligible for a grant under section 2, a local 
building code enforcement department shall submit to the Secretary the 
following:
            (1) A demonstration of the jurisdiction's needs in 
        executing building code enforcement administration.
            (2) A plan for the use of any funds received under this Act 
        that addresses the needs discussed in paragraph (1) and that is 
        consistent with the authorized uses established in section 4.
            (3) A plan for local governmental actions to be taken to 
        establish and sustain local building code enforcement 
        administration functions, without continuing Federal support, 
        at a level at least equivalent to that proposed in the grant 
        application.
            (4) A plan to create and maintain a program of public 
        outreach that includes a regularly updated and readily 
        accessible means of public communication, interaction, and 
        reporting regarding the services and work of the local building 
        code enforcement department to be supported by the grant.
            (5) A plan for ensuring the timely and effective 
        administrative enforcement of building safety and fire 
        prevention violations.

SEC. 4. USE OF FUNDS; MATCHING FUNDS.

    (a) Authorized Uses.--Grants awarded under section 2 may be used by 
the grant recipient to supplement existing State or local funding for 
building code enforcement administration. Such funds may be used to 
increase staffing, provide staff training, increase staff competence 
and professional qualifications, support individual certification or 
departmental accreditation, or for capital expenditures specifically 
dedicated to the administration of the local building code enforcement 
department.
    (b) Matching Funds Required.--
            (1) In general.--To be eligible to receive a grant under 
        this Act, a local building code enforcement department 
        serving--
                    (A) a community that is very economically 
                disadvantaged, shall provide matching, non-Federal 
                funds in an amount equal to not less than 5 percent of 
                the total amount of any grant to be awarded under this 
                Act;
                    (B) a community that is moderately economically 
                disadvantaged, shall provide matching, non-Federal 
                funds in an amount equal to not less than 10 percent of 
                the total amount of any grant to be awarded under this 
                Act; or
                    (C) any other community, shall provide matching, 
                non-Federal funds in an amount equal to not less than 
                20 percent of the total amount of any grant to be 
                awarded under this Act.
            (2) Economic distress.--
                    (A) In general.--The Secretary may waive the 
                matching fund requirements under paragraph (1), and 
                institute, by regulation, new matching fund 
                requirements based upon the level of economic distress 
                of the local jurisdiction in which the local building 
                code enforcement department seeking such grant is 
                located.
                    (B) Content of regulations.--Any regulations 
                instituted under subparagraph (A) shall include--
                            (i) a method that allows for a comparison 
                        of the degree of economic distress among the 
                        local jurisdictions of grant applicants, as 
                        measured by the differences in the extent of 
                        growth lag, the extent of poverty, and the 
                        adjusted age of housing in such jurisdiction; 
                        and
                            (ii) any other factor determined to be 
                        relevant by the Secretary in assessing the 
                        comparative degree of economic distress among 
                        such local jurisdictions.
    (c) In-Kind Contributions.--In determining the non-Federal share 
required to be provided under subsection (b), the Secretary shall 
consider in-kind contributions, not to exceed 50 percent of the amount 
that the department contributes in non-Federal funds.
    (d) Waiver of Matching Requirement.--The Secretary shall waive the 
matching fund requirements under subsection (b) for any recipient 
jurisdiction that has legislatively dedicated all building code 
permitting fees to the conduct of local building code enforcement.

SEC. 5. RATING AND RANKING OF APPLICATIONS.

    Eligible applications shall be rated and ranked according to the 
criteria described in section 6. All complete applications will be 
compared to one another and points assigned on a continuum within each 
criterion, with the maximum points awarded to the application that best 
meets the criterion.

SEC. 6. CRITERIA.

    (a) Need and Community Benefit From Code Enforcement Grant Funds.--
Applications shall be rated and ranked on the degree to which the 
application demonstrates the intent and means to ensure cooperative and 
effective working relationships between local building code enforcement 
officials and other local agencies, as well as a community-oriented 
approach to building code enforcement, with the award of points as 
follows:


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                               Description                                            Maximum Points
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A detailed description of the capital expenditures to be acquired with    0-10
 grant funds and a demonstration that the items' costs are reasonable.
The jurisdiction's need for the capital expenditure and how the grant     0-10
 funds will fulfill this need.
The joint benefits provided by the proposed expenditure for the           0-5
 following groups or activities: Provide a brief explanation of the
 benefit. (1 point will be awarded for each response, 5 points maximum).
 1. Code enforcement program.
 2. Community or jurisdiction.
 3. Interdisciplinary code enforcement team.
 4. Housing preservation, rehabilitation programs, or neighborhood
 improvement programs.
 5. Special needs groups (disabled, elderly or low or very-low income,
 etc.).
Does the proposed capital expenditure provide a cost savings benefit to   0-5
 the jurisdiction? Provide a brief explanation of the cost savings.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    (b) Current Code Enforcement and Housing Conservation Plan.--Each 
application shall be rated and ranked on the degree to which the local 
legislative body in which the applicant resides adopted a ``plan'' 
which addresses residential structure conservation and building code 
enforcement, with the award of points as follows:


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                               Description                                            Maximum Points
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The plan provides for proactive code enforcement (not just responding to  10
 complaints), an interdisciplinary approach, and includes funding
 options for repairs and rehabilitation.
The plan only provides for proactive code enforcement (not just           8
 responding to complaints) and calls for an interdisciplinary approach
 and does not address funding options for repairs and rehabilitation.
The plan provides for some type of proactive code enforcement (other      6
 than just responding to complaints) but doesn't address coordinated
 interdisciplinary activities with other local public agencies or
 funding options.
The plan provides for only reactive code enforcement.                     4
The plan only refers to a need to preserve and/or improve existing        2
 housing stock, without any code enforcement program.
No existing plan.                                                         0
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    (c) Community-Oriented or Interdisciplinary Code Enforcement.--Each 
application shall be rated and ranked on the degree to which the 
application demonstrates the intent and means to ensure cooperative and 
effective working relationships between building code enforcement 
officials and other local agencies, as well as a community-oriented 
approach to code enforcement, with the award of points as follows:


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                               Description                                            Maximum Points
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Identify current or proposed interdisciplinary code enforcement programs  0-10
 or activities and the team members (example: code enforcement, police,
 local prosecutors, health department, building and planning, fire,
 etc.). Provide a description of the team's code enforcement and
 coordination procedures, activities and services provided. If the
 current programs or resources are limited in scope, explain how receipt
 of the grant will be used to improve the program.
Identify current or proposed community-oriented code enforcement          0-10
 programs, activities or services. (Examples: community clean-ups,
 Neighborhood Watch programs, community meetings, door-to-door code
 enforcement knock and talks, etc.). If the current programs or
 resources are limited in scope, explain how receipt of the grant will
 be used to improve the program.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    (d) Proactive Code Enforcement Activities.--Each application shall 
be rated and ranked on the effectiveness of the proposed or existing 
proactive activities and programs operated by any existing building 
code enforcement program, with the award of points as follows:


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                               Description                                            Maximum Points
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Encourages repairs and preservation, rather than demolition or            0-5
 abandonment, of substandard residences.
Abatement of (a) lead hazards and lead-based paints, (b) toxic molds and  0-5
 dampness, and (c) displacement or relocation of residents.
Community clean-up campaigns, which may include recycling dates, free or  0-5
 reduced disposal rates at dumpsite, public clean-up days that encourage
 removal of unwanted or excess debris by making available extra trash
 pick-ups, dumpsites or trash or recycling containers on specific dates
 to dispose of household debris, inoperable vehicles, tires, toxic
 materials, etc.
Resource or referral programs for Federal, State, local, and private      0-5
 funds and other resources available in your jurisdiction that can
 assist with housing rehabilitation and repairs to rectify code
 violations.
Public education programs on housing issues. These could include          0-5
 community housing meetings dealing with homeownership, tenant/landlord
 issues, housing code enforcement, school age children's programs with
 coloring books or handouts, housing safety pamphlets, etc.
Programs that encourage community involvement with groups; such as        0-5
 schools, church non-profits, community service groups, utility
 companies, local stores, housing agency banks, etc.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    (e) Capacity To Financially and Technically Support Proposed 
Capital Expenditures.--Each application shall be rated and ranked on 
the degree to which the application demonstrates the jurisdiction's 
financial and technical capacity to properly use and successfully 
support the proposed capital expenditure during the term of the grant, 
with the award of points as follows:


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                               Description                                            Maximum Points
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The anticipated ongoing program funding for the duration of the grant     0-5
 program is adequate to financially support the use of the grant-
 financed equipment. Include details of funding and technical support
 sources for the capital expenditure (examples: insurance, paper,
 maintenance, training, supplies, personnel, monthly billing costs,
 etc.).
The jurisdiction has the technical capabilities to use and support        0-5
 equipment (examples: adequately trained staff or resources to provide
 training to operate technical equipment, local service provider for
 cell phones or 2-way radios, trained personnel to operate equipment,
 etc.).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

SEC. 7. EVALUATION AND REPORT.

    (a) In General.--Grant recipients shall--
            (1) be obligated to fully account and report for the use of 
        all grants funds; and
            (2) provide a report to the Secretary on the effectiveness 
        of the program undertaken by the grantee and any other criteria 
        requested by the Secretary for the purpose of indicating the 
        effectiveness of, and ideas for, refinement of the grant 
        program.
    (b) Report.--The report required under subsection (a)(2) shall 
include a discussion of--
            (1) the specific capabilities and functions in local 
        building code enforcement administration that were addressed 
        using funds received under this Act;
            (2) the lessons learned in carrying out the plans supported 
        by the grant; and
            (3) the manner in which the programs supported by the grant 
        are to be maintained by the grantee.
    (c) Content of Reports.--The Secretary shall--
            (1) require each recipient of a grant under ths Act to file 
        interim and final reports under subsection (b) to ensure that 
        grant funds are being used as intended and to measure the 
        effectiveness and benefits of the grant program; and
            (2) develop and maintain a means whereby the public can 
        access such reports, at no cost, via the Internet.

SEC. 8. DEFINITIONS.

    For purposes of this Act, the following definitions shall apply:
            (1) Building code enforcement department.--The term 
        ``building code enforcement department'' means the building 
        code inspection or enforcement agency of a local jurisdiction.
            (2) Jurisdiction.--The term ``jurisdiction'' means a city, 
        county, parish, city and county authority, or city and parish 
        authority having local authority to enforce building codes and 
        regulations and collect fees for building permits.
            (3) Secretary.--The term ``Secretary'' means the Secretary 
        of Housing and Urban Development.

SEC. 9. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

    (a) In General.--There are authorized to be appropriated 
$100,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2008 through 2013 to the 
Secretary of Housing and Urban Development to carry out the provisions 
of this Act.
    (b) Reservation.--From the amount made available under subsection 
(a), the Secretary may reserve not more than 5 percent for 
administrative costs.
    (c) Availability.--Any funds appropriated pursuant to subsection 
(a) shall remain available until expended.

Ex Output:
Community Building Code Administration Grant Act of 2007 - Requires the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development to award grants, on a competitive basis and with federal matching funds, to qualified local building code enforcement departments to increase staffing, provide staff training, increase staff competence and professional qualifications, support individual certification or departmental accreditation, or for capital expenditures specifically dedicated to department administration.

Sets forth criteria for rating and ranking of grant proposals.


Ex Input:
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Nazi Benefits Termination Act of 
1999''.

SEC. 2. DENIAL OF FEDERAL PUBLIC BENEFITS TO NAZI PERSECUTORS.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, an 
individual who is determined under this Act to have been a participant 
in Nazi persecution is not eligible for any Federal public benefit.
    (b) Definitions.--In this Act:
            (1) Federal public benefit.--The term ``Federal public 
        benefit'' shall have the meaning given such term by section 
        401(c)(1) of the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity 
        Reconciliation Act of 1996, but shall not include any benefit 
        described in section 401(b)(1) of such Act (and, for purposes 
        of applying such section 401(b)(1), the term ``alien'' shall be 
        considered to mean ``individual'').
            (2) Participant in nazi persecution.--The term 
        ``participant in Nazi persecution'' means an individual who--
                    (A) if an alien, is shown by a preponderance of the 
                evidence to fall within the class of persons who (if 
                present within the United States) would be deportable 
                under section 237(a)(4)(D) of the Immigration and 
                Nationality Act; or
                    (B) if a citizen, is shown by a preponderance of 
                the evidence--
                            (i) to have procured citizenship illegally 
                        or by concealment of a material fact or willful 
                        misrepresentation within the meaning of section 
                        340(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act; 
                        and
                            (ii) to have participated in Nazi 
                        persecution within the meaning of section 
                        212(a)(3)(E) of the Immigration and Nationality 
                        Act.

SEC. 3. DETERMINATIONS.

    (a) Hearing by Immigration Judge.--If the Attorney General has 
reason to believe that an individual who has applied for or is 
receiving a Federal public benefit may have been a participant in Nazi 
persecution (within the meaning of section 2 of this Act), the Attorney 
General may provide an opportunity for a hearing on the record with 
respect to the matter. The Attorney General may delegate the conduct of 
the hearing to an immigration judge appointed by the Attorney General 
under section 101(b)(4) of the Immigration and Nationality Act.
    (b) Procedure.--
            (1) Right of respondents to appear.--
                    (A) Citizens, permanent resident aliens, and 
                persons present in the united states.--At a hearing 
                under this section, each respondent may appear in 
                person if the respondent is a United States citizen, a 
                permanent resident alien, or present within the United 
                States when the proceeding under this section is 
                initiated.
                    (B) Others.--A respondent who is not a citizen, a 
                permanent resident alien, or present within the United 
                States when the proceeding under this section is 
                initiated may appear by video conference.
                    (C) Rule of interpretation.--This Act shall not be 
                construed to permit the return to the United States of 
                an individual who is inadmissible under section 
                212(a)(3)(E) of the Immigration and Nationality Act.
            (2) Other rights of respondents.--At a hearing under this 
        section, each respondent may be represented by counsel at no 
        expense to the Federal Government, present evidence, cross-
        examine witnesses, and obtain the issuance of subpoenas for the 
        attendance of witnesses and presentation of evidence.
            (3) Rules of evidence.--Unless otherwise provided in this 
        Act, rules regarding the presentation of evidence in the 
        hearing shall apply in the same manner in which such rules 
        would apply in a removal proceeding before a United States 
        immigration judge under section 240 of the Immigration and 
        Nationality Act.
    (c) Hearings, Findings and Conclusions, and Order.--
            (1) Findings and conclusions.--Within 60 days after the end 
        of a hearing conducted under this section, the immigration 
        judge shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law with 
        respect to whether the respondent has been a participant in 
        Nazi persecution (within the meaning of section 2 of this Act).
            (2) Order.--
                    (A) Finding that respondent has been a participant 
                in nazi persecution.--If the immigration judge finds, 
                by a preponderance of the evidence, that the respondent 
                has been a participant in Nazi persecution (within the 
                meaning of section 2 of this Act), the immigration 
                judge shall promptly issue an order declaring the 
                respondent to be ineligible for any Federal public 
                benefit, and prohibiting any person from providing such 
                a benefit, directly or indirectly, to the respondent, 
                and shall transmit a copy of the order to any 
                governmental entity or person known to be so providing 
such a benefit.
                    (B) Finding that respondent has not been a 
                participant in nazi persecution.--If the immigration 
                judge finds that there is insufficient evidence for a 
                finding under subparagraph (A) that a respondent has 
                been a participant in Nazi persecution (within the 
                meaning of section 2 of this Act), the immigration 
                judge shall issue an order dismissing the proceeding.
                    (C) Effective date; limitation of liability.--
                            (i) Effective date.--An order issued 
                        pursuant to subparagraph (A) shall be effective 
                        on the date of issuance.
                            (ii) Limitation of liability.--
                        Notwithstanding clause (i), a person or entity 
                        shall not be found to have provided a benefit 
                        to an individual in violation of this Act until 
                        the person or entity has received actual notice 
                        of the issuance of an order under subparagraph 
                        (A) with respect to the individual and has had 
                        a reasonable opportunity to comply with the 
                        order.
    (d) Review by Attorney General; Service of Final Order.--
            (1) Review by attorney general.--The Attorney General may, 
        in her discretion, review any finding or conclusion made, or 
        order issued, under subsection (c), and shall complete the 
        review not later than 30 days after the finding or conclusion 
        is so made, or order is so issued. Otherwise, the finding, 
        conclusion, or order shall be final.
            (2) Service of final order.--The Attorney General shall 
        cause the findings of fact and conclusions of law made with 
        respect to any final order issued under this section, together 
        with a copy of the order, to be served on the respondent 
        involved.
    (e) Judicial Review.--Any party aggrieved by a final order issued 
under this section may obtain a review of the order by the United 
States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit by filing a petition 
for such review not later than 30 days after the final order is issued.
    (f) Issue and Claim Preclusion.--In any administrative or judicial 
proceeding under this Act, the ordinary rules of issue preclusion and 
claim preclusion shall apply.

SEC. 4. JURISDICTION OF UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL 
              CIRCUIT OVER APPEALS UNDER THIS ACT.

    Section 1295(a) of title 28, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) by striking ``and'' at the end of paragraph (13);
            (2) by striking the period at the end of paragraph (14) and 
        inserting ``; and''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(15) of an appeal from a final order issued under the 
        Nazi Benefits Termination Act of 1999.''.

Ex Output:

Nazi Benefits Termination Act of 1999 - Denies Federal public benefits to individuals who have been participants in Nazi persecution.  Authorizes the Attorney General, if an individual who has applied for or is receiving a Federal public benefit may have been such a participant, to provide an opportunity for a hearing on the record with respect to the matter.  Allows the Attorney General to delegate the conduct of the hearing to an immigration judge. 
Describes hearing procedures under this Act.  Requires an immigration judge who finds that the respondent has been a participant in Nazi persecution to: (1) promptly issue an order declaring the respondent to be ineligible for any Federal public benefit and prohibiting any person from providing such a benefit to the respondent; and (2) transmit a copy of the order to any governmental entity or person known to be so providing such a benefit. 
Authorizes the Attorney General to review any finding or conclusion made, or order issued, and to complete the review within a specified period, or the finding, conclusion, or order shall be final. 
Allows any party aggrieved by a final order issued under this Act to obtain judicial review of the order by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.