In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: insult and non-insult. Insult is any lanugage or act that is disrespectful or scornfully abusive.

[Q]: Comment: Agree that Bannon's pushing to get out of the Paris Accord was a terrible move.

"Climate Change" is the closest thing there is to a world religion.  Even the DPRK has signed on to the Paris Accord, not of course, that it really affects them in any material way.

Giving notice to withdraw from the Paris Accord has been a complete disaster with respect to the allies we desperately need during this extremely perilous time.  The U.K., France, and Germany are good examples of this.

Trump should have simply smiled and pursued the tact that Xi & Modi have -- i.e.  tacit agreement but still acting in their nation's best interest.

Since Bannon helped to orchestrate Trump's upset win he's certainly not an "idiot" with respect to grass roots politics.  He might well be deemed an "idiot" for the disastrous effect his climate change stance has had on our geo-political security.

Do you have any specific examples which prove that Bannon is a "racist?"

Thanks.
[A]: Insult


[Q]: Comment: In 1990 Sikhs won the right to wear the turban in the RCMP. 30 years later a turban-wearing Sikh is an option to become PM. It puts the discussion about hijab-niqab-burqa into perspective.
[A]: Non-insult


[Q]: Comment: psssst, Randy, race (people of colors) exist.
Just ask the KKK.
[A]:
Non-insult