Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.

Ex Input:
Now you are debating like a coward. It was an attack claiming privilege. I only went to school in England for 3 months than had to return due to finances. I dropped out at 14 rather than subject myself to the gross incompetence of Oregon public schools. I taught myself as poverty is no excuse, and it disgusts me to no end when people use poverty as an excuse for their failures. I never went to high school and yet I scored 79% higher on the GED than the national high school graduate taking the same tests. Furthermore, this forum does not allow me to post on everything you stated, you would understand that if you gave thought before speaking. (to be continued)

Ex Output:
Yes


Ex Input:
Sorry Old Soul, I disagree and reality is not on the side of your argument. Women ARE the only people who can reproduce, men being only reproductive. The law is contrived and based on outmoded ideas including the institution of marriage--a throwback to the days of women being unable to own property, work outside the home, etc. 
It seems to me that with the inviolable right to abortion (currently it is a right that is routinely violated, but the US is obviously a backward country) comes the obligation for women to acknowledge that when they choose to allow a pregnancy to come to term and produce a child, they bear the sole responsibility for raising the child. Should they choose to allow another person involvement in the raising of the child, the biological father--whoever--that is their prerogative. To the extent the biological father is involved I would assume that it is contingent upon his active participation. There could be circumstances where the father parents on his own.

Ex Output:
No


Ex Input:
I advocated his actual suicide, motleycrew. If someone were to assassinate him his groupies would start a religion to deify him. His suicide would be much more poetic.

Ex Output:

Yes