Categorize the comment on the basis of obscenity. If the comment is obscene output Yes, otherwise output No.

Q: Here's the rebuttal: Krugman is a player for the democrats political establishment to believe otherwise is foolishness. When the RG as with many liberal newspapers don't want to appear as the lone ranger they run a Krugman kind of column. His column isn't about Trump, it's all about getting Hillary elected. Like most democrats you don't see it anymore then the next tool. The Clintons are among the top 1%, the insider political establishment   and they intend to stay there no matter what or who they use. Independents like myself see it plainly for it is, a few Master Gardeners the 1% [the Clintons] have a shed full of foolish tools willing to be used. It all boils down to Forrest Gump's story.... "stupid is as stupid does". The really question is: So what does Hillary's moral and mental character have to offer the nation I know the answer do you?

A: Yes
****
Q: It would be wonderful to have so with higher credentials perform tests. There have been small scale tests performed. There are no retail investors to exploit the potential profits.

Steve is a conservationist, so many of the projects they hope this will support have an environmental focus.

For the salinity concern collection volumes are focused on surplus flow like storm run off. Most of the collection points were designed to be portable to minimize impacts on fishing industry and migratory species.

You can learn more at RiverRecycler.com

A: No
****
Q: I'd start by killing the LIO, Susitna Dam, Ambler Road, Knik Bridge, Juneau Rd. and the oil tax credits.  Pain should be felt by all including the royalty occupying the LIO and oilies.

A:
Yes
****