In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Example Input: Comment: Finishing up here, the underlying problem I see is that either through direct coordination with the Clinton campaign (thank you Wikileaks), or through a desire to drive up ratings/profits, the mainstream media has been taking many of Trump's words out of context and intentionally stoking fear and racism across party lines for the past year. At the same time, any stories about HRC's actual racism, like having the young woman removed by security at a press conference when she dared to ask about the "super predator" comment from the 90s, were completely buried. Now that Trump has been elected, the media is going into overdrive to drive people apart. Quick to blame Trump, blame some absurd Russian conspiracy theory, cast al his supporters as racist and ignorant, but dont talk about real policy issues. Dont talk about widespread police abuse, make it about race. Dont talk about widespread poverty, make it about race. Dont talk about lost jobs across the board, make it about race.
Example Output: Non-sexual-explicit

Example Input: Comment: You see that Chimp -- you just can't help - try as you might - to L-L-L-L- LABEL!!!  Everybody do the Label-Label - it's the newest Craze!  So you label my comment a "rant." A rant? Rant?? Your response to my 'rant' is longer than my 'rant.' I think I have a label for that around here somewhere. Oh yes, here it is, my 'hypocrisy' label. Thanks for the slap. Are you happy?
Example Output: Non-sexual-explicit

Example Input: Comment: Being forced to have sex with someone because you have been sold into prostitution is not a mortal sin.  There are many mitigating factors there.  And Humane Vitae is about marital sex, not sex between a prostitute and a client.  As Pope Benedict pointed out, a prostitute who uses a condom doesn't sin by using the condom.  In fact, for a prostitute regardless of sex, it is a responsible step to use a condom.  I am not sure what the big deal is unless you think that a female prostitute being knocked up with a HIV infected baby through one of her "clients" is a good thing.  I certainly don't.  These women should be using condoms until they can extract themselves from that situation.
Example Output:
Sexual-explicit