In this task, you will use your knowledge about language (and common sense) to determine what element the marked number refers to. The numbers are marked with two underlines around them, like: _ number _. Your answer should be chosen from the given text, and should not contain other words.

Ex Input:
Peter Dragon:  Okay , Stuart , look , there is an enormous difference between movies and television . You know what that difference is ?
Stuart Glazer: No ...
Peter Dragon: Okay , let 's take a look at my rolodex , okay ? I 'll be the movie , you be the TV rolodex . In my movie rolodex I have , eh , Sean Connery . Your TV rolodex ? Shawn Wayans . Eh ? Marlon Brando , Marlon Wayans . Alec Baldwin , Alec ... eh ... Wayans . There 's probably _ one _ floating around , I do n't know .

Ex Output:
Wayans


Ex Input:
Special Agent Rachel McCord:  I was following up on Valkyrie to see if there was anything more to the story . This is a family photo we got from Rasheed . He identified this woman as the servant whose body Bronson took after the air strike . And we 've identified her as Farrah Usman .
Matt Hendricks: Yeah , she 's listed as a civilian contractor working out of the U.S. Consulate in Kabul .
Special Agent Rachel McCord: It 's a typical cover for an intelligence operative .
Matt Hendricks: Yeah , and she was supposedly killed by a roadside IED the same night as the Zawari attack .
Chief Carl Villante: Well , that makes sense . The injuries from an IED look a lot like those from an air strike .
Special Agent Rachel McCord: That 's not the story . Look at this . So , Farrah Usman 's body was shipped back to Dover two days later . It was claimed by this man . Recognize that name ?
Kate Beckett: Brad Parker ? The reporter ?
Special Agent Rachel McCord: _ One _ and the same .
Kate Beckett: I do n't get it . How is he connected to Valkyrie ?
Special Agent Rachel McCord: According to the paperwork , he was her fiancé . He 's involved in this whole thing .

Ex Output:
Parker


Ex Input:
Ambril:  Now , take this as an example . It dates from the middle Sumaran era , and unusually , is mentioned quite specifically in the legend . Well , there can be no doubt , the references to the Six Faces of Delusion . Yeah , now count : one , two , three , four , five . You will observe there are five faces , not six , as the legend would have it . Now , my point is this : I do find it quite extraordinarily difficult to take seriously a legend that can not even count accurately .
Ambril: Of
Ambril: course , aristically speaking is an entirely different matter . The piece is exquisite . An undoubted masterpiece .
The Doctor: What is it ?
Ambril: Hmm ? Headdress .
The Doctor: Try it on .
Ambril: What ?
The Doctor: Try it on .
Ambril: Certainly not ! Whatever for ?
The Doctor: Please , I want to show you something . Then I 'll go and leave you in peace .
Ambril: Hmm , very well .
Ambril: Well
The Doctor: ?
The Doctor: Now , count the faces again .
Ambril: Well , do as he says .
Chela: _ One _ , two , three , four , five .
The Doctor: And one makes six . The Sixth Face of Delusion is the wearer 's own . That was probably the idea , do n't you think ?
Ambril: Get out ! Go on , get out !

Ex Output:

Faces