The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the no-need strategy, otherwise output No. no-need is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used when a participant points out that they do not need an item based on personal context such as suggesting that they have ample water to spare. no-need can directly benefit the opponent since it implies that the item is up for grabs.

Q: Context: 'How many of each supply would you like? what is your favorite?' 'I am flexible, but I would prefer some food and firewood.  I have a large family to feed and all of my food needs to be cooked.' 'I also would prefer some food but am willing to give 3 fire wood in exchange for 3 water. I suffer from chronic dehydration because I sweat too much.'
Utterance: 'Excellent, I would love to help you out.  We have plenty of water to spare.  I'd gladly give you 3 water in exchange for 3 firewood.'

A: Yes
****
Q: Context: 'Hmm, ok, thats pretty fair. I do have a larger group going as well, so would it be okay if I got 2 extra food then?' 'I think that will work. ' 'Ok, great!🙂 Just to recap, I'll get 2 water, 0 firewood, 2 food, you get the rest.'
Utterance: 'That's right.  Thanks for making this part of planning for the trip easy'

A: No
****
Q: Context: 'How are you today? Did you have any preferences on the supplies we will be trading?' 'I am good. How about yourself? I think I would like some firewood to start off with. We like to have bigger fires. What about you?'
Utterance: 'I am good as well. That is good to hear that you like to have bigger fires as we do not care much for that. We would much rather have some extra water.'

A:
Yes
****