In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

Ex Input:
Comment: Yes, let's end the insanity!  No more trans people! No more boys kissing boys! No more rock n roll music! Let's get back to the good ol' days of the 1950s!

Ex Output:
Identity-attack


Ex Input:
Comment: "It doesn't keep elections 'pure' it just drives the money into STUPID AREAS"

Well, that's a useful bunch of gibberish. It's not like there aren't elections all around the world with campaign finance laws that work quite well.

"You want to get good candidates get rid of every restriction BUT the REPORTING requirements."

Here's a better idea: leave every candidate with limited but equal financing -- so that candidates focus solely on explaining why their policy is superior to all others -- and every citizen, whether billionaire or hobo has but one equal voice.

It's "one man one vote" not "one dollar one vote."

Ex Output:
Non-identity-attack


Ex Input:
Comment: Maybe the Mormons can call the organization to replace the Boy Scouts for their members the "HITLER YOUTHS" or "White is Right for Boys Only." Don't forget how the church discriminated again non-whites and only changed because of pressure from civil rights groups. Remember too that they were practicing polygamist. I always wondered why did they change? Isn't it part of their belief system? Oh...public opinion and illegality. Yeah...that's the way to stand up for your beliefs....fold under pressure.

Ex Output:

Identity-attack