In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Q: Comment: Obviously the media wants us to vote for Hilary, their coverage is so slanted. And how did this get turned into Trump "forcing women into sex?"

A: Sexual-explicit
****
Q: Comment: Trid sees nothing wrong with "No Dogs or Jews", "We don't serve Muslims" and so on. He supports bigotry. And no, that is NOT a straw man, but the clear and obvious implication of your " If either the buyer or the seller does not want to enter into that contract for whatever reason then I believe they have the right to refuse." Thank you for proving that your claim to being a Christian is a complete sham.

A: Non-sexual-explicit
****
Q: Comment: I don't like much about young Justin.  Touchy-feely politicians make my skin crawl.  But that aside, just what does this McLaren  woman expect of the guy?  Trump is a 73 year-old successful business executive while Trudeau is a young high school drama teacher that has yet to accomplished anything.  Would she have him lecture this head of the most significant and successful country the world has ever seen?   I really don't think so.  Suck it up sweetie............... you're out of bounds!

A:
Sexual-explicit
****