TASK DEFINITION: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the self-need strategy, otherwise output No. self-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to create a personal need for an item in the negotiation, such as by pointing out that the participant sweats a lot to show preference towards water packages.
PROBLEM: Context: 'Splitting the food is what I was thinking as well, but I'd also like to split the firewood. We can split the water or I'm fine taking all of that.' 'I would be willing to take 2 firewood, 3 food, and 1 water if that would work for you.  ' 'Hmm I think I should take 2 food, 1 firewood, and 3 water. What do you think?'
Utterance: 'Is your first priority the water?  I'm definitely willing to split up by what is most important to us both.'

SOLUTION: No

PROBLEM: Context: 'I will need 2 firewood, 2 water and 1 food'
Utterance: 'How about you take all the firewood because I have the skills necessary to chop down more. I also will need three packages of food because I will be climbing a very tall mountain.'

SOLUTION: Yes

PROBLEM: Context: 'I can't wait 🙂 Let's talk about these supplies. I've got hungry mouths to feed, Can I take the food and you can have half the firewood and all the water?' 'Hmm, I need food too. I am willing to split. I will give you 2 food since you claimed it first. Can I have 2 waters then?' 'That's fair, but I have wiggle room on the water, how about I take two food, two firewood and you take 3 water, 1 food, 1 firewood?'
Utterance: 'Is there anyway you will go with that I get two firewood? I need food the most but since you get most of that can I get most of the firewood? So 1 food, 2 firewood, and 2 water for me?'

SOLUTION:
No