We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.
--------
Question: Attorney General John Ashcroft, for example, says that the second amendment protects an individual right to bear arms, but he has also stated that he supports the extension of the Federal Assault Weapons Ban.

Answer: Valid


Question: Lying in compliance and trusting two criminals to feel that it's not necessary to harm anyone, or actually do something that can lead to stopping the dangerous individuals before they have the opportunity to harm someone?

Answer: Valid


Question: Since gun owners are not proposing that we ban automobiles, there is an obvious flaw in their logic.

Answer:
Valid