In this task, you're given a statement, and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence clearly disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3' corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.

[Q]: Statement: It means that instead of blandly assuming less regulation is better than more or more competition is better than less, you have to study the specifics of each case very carefully. Choices:  1. Studying the specifics of every case is what it means. 2. If you don't study the specifics, you won't get it right. 3. There's no need to study the specifics, not at all.
[A]: 3


[Q]: Statement: The rest of the building and an adjoining college were destroyed in a typhoon-fanned fire in 1835. Choices:  1. The building survived the 1835 fire, remaining completely intact. 2. The 1835 fire that destroyed the rest of the building, was started by an unattended candle. 3. The rest of the building was destroyed by fire in 1835.
[A]: 1


[Q]: Statement: yeah i expect it would yeah but boy it would move you across the water though Choices:  1. I'm sure that engine could move both you and your kids across the water with no difficulty. 2. Indeed, that engine would be more than adequate for your needs. 3. It would not be enough to move you across the water; it doesn't have nearly enough horsepower.
[A]:
3