We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gay Marriage) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gay marriage. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gay marriage.

Q: If letting judges carry out constitutional interpretation was really what they were looking for, they would not complain when that interpretation doesn't go their way.

A: Invalid
****
Q: Just cause gay marriage is legal doesn't mean anybody "accepts" us.

A: Valid
****
Q: But I ANSWERED your little "2-year old marriage" problem by saying I would STICK TO THE CONSTITUTION and I said that I would want the other 49 states (which had marriage) to stick to the FF&C clause.

A:
Valid
****