In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

[Q]: Comment: You don't want a discussion, you want to explain these terrorist attacks away by blaming it all on the West.
If it's all the West's fault, why are these terrorist organizations killing more Muslims than Westerners? Why are they forcing Arabs to adhere to their strict interpretation of Islam? Why are they raping Arab  girls, enslaving Arab women, mass killing Arab men?
Explain why  ISIL wants to create a caliphate from legitimate ,recognized countries? You have not once acknowledged that ISIL is responsible for many of these attacks, and they cannot be considered an organization representing your average Arab. Unless, you try to twist the argument to fit your narrative.
You're argument is coloured by your obvious hatred for the Jews, so you do not have a pertinent argument; otherwise, you would have used it.
[A]: Identity-attack


[Q]: Comment: I asked Jesus and he said that no matter what the baker does, he knows that the baker hates gays in his heart.
Jesus thinks the baker should stop being a little baby and make the cake.

Jack Philips has actually made many cakes for gay weddings, he just did not know it. No one is under obligation to say, “by the way, this is for a gay wedding.”
[A]: Identity-attack


[Q]: Comment: yeah those pesky catholic head choppers need to be driven out of canada right?
[A]:
Identity-attack