TASK DEFINITION: We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.
PROBLEM: Sent1: First, we must choose to use executions because they may save innocent life.
 Sent2: There should no be a death penalty, since by taking a human's life, we are not saving it.

SOLUTION: Not similar

PROBLEM: Sent1: Therefore, the Death Penalty stands as a humane form of justice.
 Sent2: IMO the death penalty is about justice for the loved ones of the victims.

SOLUTION: Similar

PROBLEM: Sent1: I say if they try to kill/escape from life w/o parole in prison that's all we should need for the death penalty.
 Sent2: I say if someone gets life w/o parole, they should be put into a real jail, rather than the country clubs many criminals go to.

SOLUTION:
Not similar