In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

Example Input: Sentence: The sun was covered by a thick cloud all morning, but luckily, by the time the picnic started, it was gone.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the cloud because it was so thick that it obscured the sun. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Example Output: Correct

Example Input: Sentence: The actress used to be named Terpsichore, but she changed it to Tina a  few years ago, because she figured it was too hard to pronounce.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to terpsichore because it's a good name for a young girl, and also because as a writer, she's not. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Example Output: Wrong

Example Input: Sentence: I'm sure that my map will show this building; it is very famous.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the building because Yes, this is correct.....the map is very good. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Example Output:
Wrong