We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Q: Sent1: Is the victim going to come back that the criminal is dead?
 Sent2: The killer is not going to take away innocent lives anymore because the killer is dead.

A: Not similar
****
Q: Sent1: I don't even give a shit about the death penalty, I was just making a point.
 Sent2: The death penalty right now is to easy even I think.

A: Not similar
****
Q: Sent1: If a person wasn't convicted then they surely wouldn't be murdered by the state.
 Sent2: killing someone who has raped them or hurt a family member, while some of these reasons would definitely require being locked up the death penalty does not seem right for alot of situations

A:
Not similar
****