Given a document, an entity and its sentiment towards the entity, verify if it is the correct sentiment towards the entity. Answer should be yes or no. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

Ex Input:
Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Lori Swanson is Negative . The company denies it did anything wrong  insisting it was acting legally at the time. The settlement did not require an admission of liability   Attorney General Lori Swanson  said.
"We're pleased with the settlement. We think the settlement will help solve a problem in Minnesota. It's been a problem that has been a long time in the making for many decades "  Swanson  said. "These chemicals  as I mentioned  were put into the ground. And we are very hopeful the settlement can help fix that."
The settlement was announced Tuesday after jury selection was halted as the trial was set to begin.  Swanson  said  she  believes it is the largest environmental case in state history.
 Swanson  said 3M will pay the state in one lump sum within the next 15 days. It will go into a fund dedicated to projects that will clean up and safeguard drinking water in the eastern suburbs of St. Paul. Details on how the money will be used are still being worked out  but it could go to help homeowners with contaminated wells  or help municipalities with sustainable drinking water and treatment plans.

Ex Output:
no


Ex Input:
Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity John Leahy is Positive . “The market is just stronger everywhere ” Airbus sales chief John Leahy told reporters.
“We beat Boeing one last time ... we just went for it ”  Leahy  told Reuters.
Both bequeathed challenging targets to their successors as  Leahy  predicted that orders would exceed deliveries in 2018 for the ninth year in a row  while Bregier predicted “close to 800” deliveries this year as output accelerates after engine delays.
 Leahy  confirmed a Reuters report that the future of the A380 lies with Emirates  even though other airlines are interested in smaller numbers of the 544-seat jets. If the deal falls through  Airbus would have “no choice” but to close production   he  said.

Ex Output:
yes


Ex Input:
Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Roger Goodell is Neutral . A letter sent to all 32 NFL teams by Commissioner Roger Goodell  makes clear that the league wants to "move past" the anthem controversy. The league will propose a standardized policy on behavior during the playing of the National Anthem that will include all players and team personnel standing.
 The letter  does not mention any punishment for players who refuse to stand  which makes enforcement of the policy problematic.
 Goodell  made it clear in  the letter   obtained by ESPN's Adam Schefter  that  he  wants players to stand during the anthem.  He  did not provide specifics on how  he  intends to ensure it  but  he  wrote that it would "include such elements as an in-season platform to promote the work of our players on these core issues." The issue will be discussed  and likely acted upon  during the NFL's regularly-scheduled fall meetings on Oct. 17-18. In  the letter    Goodell  said  he  wanted to end the controversy by agreeing on a uniform approach for all teams. "Like many of our fans "  Goodell  wrote  "we believe that everyone should stand for the national anthem. It is an important moment in our game. We want to honor our flag and our country  and our fans expect that of us. "We also care deeply about our players and respect their opinions and concerns about critical social issues. The controversy over the Anthem is a barrier to having honest conversations and making real progress on the underlying issues. We need to move past this controversy  and we want to do that together with our players." The NFL's current anthem policy states that players "should" stand for the anthem  but it stops short of requiring it. The proposed new policy is the result of "many of discussions with clubs and players " Goodell added.
Local 100 of the United Labor Unions has filed a complaint charging that Jones's implicit demands of players violated the National Labor Relations Act. "[T]he employer  evidenced by repeated public statements  is attempting to threaten  coerce and intimidate all Dallas Cowboys players on the roster in order to prevent them from exercising concerted activity protected under the act by saying that he will fire any players involved in such concerted activity " the National Labor Relations Board said in its filing. Jones has not actually threatened to fire players  instead saying they "will not play " but a labor union spokesman told ESPN that is a "distinction without difference when it comes to the law." The NFL's game operations manual has said players "should" stand for the anthem   a stance NFL commissioner Roger Goodell  reaffirmed Tuesday in a memo to team owners. "Like many of our fans  we believe that everyone should stand for  the National Anthem " Goodell  wrote. But there's a gap between "should" and "must " and in trying to bridge that gap  Jones overreached  the labor union contends. The NLRB will investigate the case and will take it to trial if it determines a violation occurred and a settlement can't be reached. Meanwhile  Jones appeared to moderate his stance the tiniest bit on Tuesday  allowing for the possibility of pre-anthem protests similar to what the Cowboys did prior to their game against the Arizona Cardinals in Week 3. "If we're going to have any other recognition the place to have it is before the anthem in my view and be real clear that it's not associated with the anthem " Jones told 105.3 The Fan in Dallas. "I think it's real important for our players that they have that to reply to anybody whether they're asking them to express themselves or not that the way we do it where I work  where I earn my livelihood  is that we stand for the flag." It's impossible to overstate the distraction that Jones has created in the Cowboys' locker room  as well as others across the NFL. Players must decide whether paychecks outweigh principles  and star players must decide whether to take the heat for lesser-known teammates. This story isn't going away  and it's no longer just the players driving the narrative.

Ex Output:

yes