We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Input: Consider Input: Sent1: I mean the death penalty is giving them a passage out of trouble, they wouldn't have to deal with the effects they had on the world.
 Sent2: Like I said I would just want them to actually have to deal with the consequences and not get an easy out, which is what executing them does.

Output: Similar


Input: Consider Input: Sent1: Living in jail for life costs less money then the death penalty.
 Sent2: Life and death decisions should NOT be based on money.

Output: Not similar


Input: Consider Input: Sent1: i think that life without opportunity of parole is the more humane and just punishment instead of the death penalty.
 Sent2: Life imprisonment without parole is more effective than execution, and it is cheaper.


Output: Similar