We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

[EX Q]: And what Hitler did was change Germany gun control laws to explicitly disarm the jewish population based on religion.
[EX A]: Valid

[EX Q]: Furthermore, the Founders envisioned people being armed with much less powerful weapons when they wrote the Second Amendment.
[EX A]: Valid

[EX Q]: It wouldn't protect the guns owned at the home of someone in the National Guard.]
[EX A]:
Valid