We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

[Q]: What about the fact that the UK feels the need to ban knives and toy guns now?
[A]: Valid


[Q]: And what Hitler did was change Germany gun control laws to explicitly disarm the jewish population based on religion.
[A]: Valid


[Q]: The gentleman himself has only endeavoured to controvert the force of the evidence by law, but no law can be found to justify such conduct as either of these persons was guilty of, and particularly Dr Reynolds.
[A]:
Invalid