We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

Example Input: Please show me what law prevents amending the constitution to repeal another amendment.
Example Output: Valid

Example Input: You can debate that without guns there would be more deaths to other weapons although you can't debate it would be to the same extent as gun murders and crimes would be.
Example Output: Valid

Example Input: NY responds by arguing that their gun restriction scheme cannot get a fair test to prove its worth because gun runners evade the restrictions by going to other states with less restrictive laws to import the guns illegally.
Example Output:
Valid