In this task, you're given a pair of sentences, sentence 1 and sentence 2. Your job is to determine if the two sentences clearly agree/disagree with each other, or if this can't be determined. Indicate your answer as yes or no respectively.

Q: Sentence 1: In those cases where challenges and risks are addressed, agencies use a variety of approacHe's, including setting goals and measures directly linked to the management challenges and program risks, establishing goals and measures that are indirectly related to the challenges and risks, or laying out strategies to address them. Sentence 2: Goals and measures are important and so are the strategies.

A: no
****
Q: Sentence 1: We thank them for their willingness to participate in our study, for the valuable information and insights they provided, and for their hospitality. Sentence 2: Without their hospitality and insight, we wouldn't have been able to complete our study.

A: no
****
Q: Sentence 1: This parallel obsession elicited the interesting suggestion, from the critic Maurice Tuchman, that both animals (especially sacrificed animals) and uniformed domestics were scapegoats of sorts. Sentence 2: Tuchman did not suggest anything related to animals.

A:
yes
****