In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

Input: Consider Input: Comment: This is just another black militant commie with hate for the White man and our country's system of government...Take a look at her voting record for our veterans

Output: Identity-attack


Input: Consider Input: Comment: "It doesn't keep elections 'pure' it just drives the money into STUPID AREAS"

Well, that's a useful bunch of gibberish. It's not like there aren't elections all around the world with campaign finance laws that work quite well.

"You want to get good candidates get rid of every restriction BUT the REPORTING requirements."

Here's a better idea: leave every candidate with limited but equal financing -- so that candidates focus solely on explaining why their policy is superior to all others -- and every citizen, whether billionaire or hobo has but one equal voice.

It's "one man one vote" not "one dollar one vote."

Output: Non-identity-attack


Input: Consider Input: Comment: the media and Reid is one of their ilk are masters of diversion and twisting of truth and in many cases outright fabrications.  the Mexicans are rapists is but one example


Output: Identity-attack