Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.

[Q]: Let's create an industry that provides lots of jobs, like thousands of jobs, and then let's make sure it can export lots of stuff, like billions of dollars of value. That surely would be great! 

Oh yeah, that would be the commercial fishing industry in Alaska, which does supply many low paying wage jobs to many non-residents, who take most of their earnings out of state. 

Commercial fishing harvests and processes billions of pounds of seafood from Alaska, with an export value of $5 to $6 billion. Yet they produce no net taxes to Alaska, and are subsidized by the state. It is so bad now ADFG is going into the commercial fish business through cost recovery fisheries. 

Where are the journalists on this story? One of the largest industries in the state pays no net taxes to the state, ADFG is doing cost recovery fisheries just to keep the doors open, the seafood industry cries it makes no money on $6 billion in exports, and no one in the media says the emperor has no clothes?
[A]: No


[Q]: Unfortunately, they would be perfectly happy there as long as they felt they were getting something us "great unwashed masses" were not. I would suggest adding some kind of adult monitor in the room, only to make sure they weren't licking the windows and eating paste. This can make even the densest sick in the tum-tum, and I'm not sure how much more of their childish behavior and whining I can take.
[A]: No


[Q]: This was a hit. A bold hit. 3:30 pm, entered home, shot pet. Random, not in a million years.
[A]:
Yes