We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Sent1: An argument regarding the death penalty should be confined to discussions regarding those who have been wrongly convicted and sentenced to death.
 Sent2: As it is today, when someone murderers another, the death penalty is considered, as it should be.
Not similar

Sent1: Only if they try to murder somebody after they are in prison do they deserve the death penalty?
 Sent2: Capital punishment is killing someone as a punishment for a crime they committed.
Not similar

Sent1: We shouldn't just kill someone if they commit a crime.
 Sent2: If somebody is completely innocent and they are executed for a crime they didn't commit (which, with forensics these days, probably will never happen again), that is a problem.

Not similar