In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

[EX Q]: Comment: Foreigners are buying property everywhere.  It should be a condition of any Asians coming to Canada that they agree to live in underground tunnels that we bore for them.  Living in a tunnel is still way better than living in China.
[EX A]: Non-sexual-explicit

[EX Q]: Comment: I'm sorry, but you can't truly know someone based on the limited interaction you have delivering the mail. Hell, I'm on a first name basis with our mail delivery guy who I see nearly every weekday, and we have always exchanged friendly pleasantries. He'd probably say I am a kind spirited guy too. Ask my friends though, and they'll tell ya the truth. I'm kind of a dick.
[EX A]: Sexual-explicit

[EX Q]: Comment: How come no Wikileaks of Republican emails?  Certainly, they would hotter with the likes of Ann Coulter in the mix; make for more sizzling read!
Sad thing are the "Catholic" lap dogs for Trump: Guiliani, Christies, Hannity, O'Reilly, KA Conway, etc. (Bloggers, add to the list; they are legion).
The list competes with Trump's distortions, lies, personal attacks, etc.

How RCs can be in his toxic company & maintain their Catholic virginity is difficult to comprehend.

I guess they feel they can get this in during the Year of Mercy & be absolved.
[EX A]:
Non-sexual-explicit