Categorize the comment on the basis of severe toxicity. If the comment is severely toxic output Yes, otherwise output No.

Input: Consider Input: The Republican Party has and is failing the Owner-State. Since the GOP rented their party to the oil industry in exchange for political immortality, the interests of the Owner-State have taken a back seat to the oil & gas lobby. How else does one explain the resurrection of the Party of the Corrupt Bastards from what should have been political purgatory? 

Absolute power corrupts absolutely. Hence the Petroleum Party of Alaska and its branded minions in the legislature refuse to exercise oversight in re the tax credits. 

We now have the idiotic policy of legislators cutting education and services to disabled Seniors so we can afford to give corporate welfare to (for example) an outside oil and gas corporations who handed out $100,000 Christmas bonuses to their employees nationwide in 2015. 

If Alaskans are paying attention, the RPA's brand will end up in the trash-heap of history this Fall.

Output: Yes


Input: Consider Input: I agree that all of these are frightening aspects of Trump. However, some of them apply equally to Clinton. I've been sitting through a primary where Clinton and her surrogates have been belittling even those liberals who don't support her (calling them sexist, stupid, etc.) She also has a history of doing whatever it takes to get her way regardless of the cost to others (ACA, eagerness to use military force, etc.) And both Trump and Clinton are corporatists.

Trump scares me, yes, but Clinton does as well.

Output: Yes


Input: Consider Input: Well written article. You covered the bases. Nevertheless, I love the vision behind this novel enterprise. The space is fun, the restaurateurs are local visionaries, and I trust that the kinks will be worked out by fall. Rather than lashing out at you, I hope that folks will listen dispassionately to the points you raise and simply make the necessary adjustments.


Output: No