Categorize the comment on the basis of toxicity. If the comment is toxic (harmful, malicious, derogatory, threat, insult, identity attck, etc.) output Yes, otherwise output No.

Example Input: So this is what it's come to:

From Allen Ginsberg:

"I saw the best minds of my generation destroyed by madness, starving hysterical naked, dragging themselves through the negro streets at dawn looking for an angry fix, angelheaded hipsters burning for the ancient heavenly connection to the starry dynamo in the machinery of night . . ."

To: Anonymous (Lambda Chi Alpha)

"Fuck it all, fuck it all, I don't give a shit anymore."

Sigh.
Example Output: Yes

Example Input: Yeah I don't think borrowing money w a very bleak economic outlook for the city ,and state is a good Idea. Stop spending money, and don't raise taxes on oil companies they will invest somewhere else. If you don't the change in oil prices will be more painful than necessary. when you have a market based mostly on oil every time it goes up you raise your  budget then when it goes down you need to reduce your budget. It's like the guy who's house goes up in value but instead of being happy they have equity they borrow the new amount then when it goes down they cry about still owing more than they can sell for. Whe the economy does good you save some because the markets will always have ups and downs. also now OPEC has competition these low oil prices  may be some what permanent. Raising oil tax equals less oil production. The state legislature is being sued, and evicted out of it's building in anchorage thats the level of competence you are dealing w.
Example Output: No

Example Input: " Just another reminder that people are generally stupid sheep."
 Hussein Obama is all the reminder we need that the " stupid" vote.
Example Output:
Yes