Given a document, an entity and its sentiment towards the entity, verify if it is the correct sentiment towards the entity. Answer should be yes or no. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].
--------
Question: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Jamie Dimon is Negative . Bitcoin's price has fully recovered from  its  recent slump after  JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon  called it a fraud and Chinese regulators cracked down on exchanges.
The cryptocurrency had a drawdown of up to 14% in the 10 days after September 12  when  Dimon  compared it to the tulip bubble of the 1600s and vowed to fire traders who used it.
By Thursday  bitcoin had all of the losses. It was up nearly 2% from the lows on the day  Dimon  spoke  at $4157.31 per coin at 10:28 a.m. ET.
The move illustrates bitcoin's wild volatility; it's gained 331% this year  unheard of for any major currency and most financial assets. It also shows why many Wall Street professionals like  Dimon  don't see it as a legitimate store of value but as a speculative instrument.

Answer: no


Question: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Logan Paul is Neutral . The video service announced this week that it had pulled  Logan Paul's  channel from its ad-supported Google Preferred platform and put two other projects on hold.
YouTube chief business officer Robert Kyncl said Saturday there's no timetable for when  Paul 's future will be addressed again. Kyncl didn't shut YouTube's door on  Paul .
 Paul  apologized for posting video of  him  in a forest near Mount Fuji in Japan near what seemed to be a body hanging from a tree. The location is known in Japan as a frequent site for suicides.
YouTube said the images violated its policies.  Paul  pulled the images from  his  channel on  his  own.
Kyncl said  Paul  recognizes that he has made serious missteps and has expressed remorse for them.
"The most important thing to focus on is that actions speak louder than words and Logan has the opportunity to prove that "  he  said.
Removing  Paul 's work from the Google Preferred platform cuts off a significant route to advertising revenue through YouTube. YouTube also said it would not feature  Paul  in the fourth season of its series "Foursome" and would put other work on hold.  Paul  is one of the platform's biggest stars  with Forbes magazine estimating  he  earned $12.5 million last year.

Answer: no


Question: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Dante Servin is Positive . There's  no question that Chicago police detective Dante Servin killed Rekia Boyd when he fired five shots at a group of people in a dark West Side alley .  The question  is whether  his  actions were justified because  he  had a reasonable fear that  his  life was in danger.
We'll never know the answer  because Cook County Judge Dennis Porter got stuck on a different question: Should  Servin  have been charged with a more serious crime than involuntary manslaughter?
 Servin 's trial ended Monday with a directed verdict of not guilty because Porter decided prosecutors had aimed too low.
 Servin  was off duty and in  his  personal car when  he  got in a shouting match with the group in March 2012.  His  lawyers say  he  drew  his  gun and fired when Antonio Cross pulled an object from  his  waistband and pointed it at  Servin .  Boyd  was hit in the back of the head.  She  died two days later.  She  was 22.
After three days of testimony  Porter abruptly ended  Servin 's bench trial. He said prosecutors had shown "beyond a reasonable doubt" that Servin killed  Boyd   and that the officer fired the shots knowing they were likely to cause great bodily harm or death. Those elements would add up to first-degree murder  the judge said  unless  Servin  could prove he acted in self defense. But  Servin  never had to make that case.
Another look at  the Dante Servin verdict . (WGN TV) Another look at  the Dante Servin verdict . (WGN TV) SEE MORE VIDEOS
To win a conviction on the involuntary manslaughter charge  prosecutors needed to prove that  Servin  acted recklessly — without regard for the risks.
 Servin  couldn't be convicted of first-degree murder because  he  was charged with involuntary manslaughter. And  he  couldn't be convicted of involuntary manslaughter  Porter said  because there was no evidence of reckless behavior.
The appellate courts said the evidence supported a first-degree murder conviction and the defendants weren't entitled to be tried on a less serious charge. Their convictions were upheld.  Servin 's outcome turns that on  its  head.
We asked around and found some attorneys who agreed with Porter's reasoning and some who didn't. It's not subject to appeal  because  Servin  was found not guilty. The case is over.
 Servin  did not help matters with  his  comments to reporters after the verdict.  He  repeated  his  contention that Boyd's death was an accident — let's be clear   the judge  said no such thing — and said  he  was lucky not to be "a police death statistic."
"Antonio Cross is a would-be cop killer  and that's all I have to say "  Servin  said.
 Servin  was making an off-duty burger run in  his  personal car when the confrontation occurred.  He  was not putting  his  life on the line to serve and protect.
Cross is not a would-be cop killer.  His  "weapon" turned out to be a cell phone. An aggravated assault charge against  him  was dropped in March 2013  the same day the city agreed to a $4.5 million wrongful death settlement with Boyd's relatives.

Answer:
no