We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

[EX Q]: The bird watchers don't pay doodly squat to enjoy what the hunters and gun purchasers provide for wildlife habitat.
[EX A]: Valid

[EX Q]: The manufacturer tells them who the gun was shipped to, the dealer is contacted, and the dealer informs the ATF or the police of who the gun was sold to and when.
[EX A]: Valid

[EX Q]: In Britain, meanwhile, police are planning to implement another firearms amnesty, despite the fact that a ban on handgun ownership was implemented in 1997 and 60,000 guns were turned in during the first amnesty a decade earlier.
[EX A]:
Valid