We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Ex Input:
Sent1: First, the ruling was that the Second Amendment only applied to firearms that had a militia purposes and that the sawed-off shotgun in question didn't have any evidence of being suitable for a militia.
 Sent2: In the Miller case, the court essentially ruled that the second ammendment does indeed convey an individual right, but that the right in question is dependant on the type of weapon (i.e must be suitable for military use).

Ex Output:
Similar


Ex Input:
Sent1: If people are going to carry guns for protection, they should be encouraged to put lots and lots of rounds through the gun.
 Sent2: Usually it is 'oh look out look out, them gun nuts are going to do something.

Ex Output:
Not similar


Ex Input:
Sent1: The 2nd Amendment was put in to stop your guys from infringing on our Right to Keep and Bear Arms!
 Sent2: 2nd amendment: A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the RIGHT OF THE PEOPLE to keep and bear arms shall NOT be INFRINGED.

Ex Output:

Similar