The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the uv-part strategy, otherwise output No. uv-part is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to undermine the requirements of the opponent. For instance, suggesting that the opponent would not need more firewood since they already have the basic supplies or a suggestion that there might be a store near the campsite where the opponent can get the supplies instead.

[Q]: Context: 'Ok, so you must prefer water and food over firewood. We might have lucked out as far as our priorities go!🙂' 'Yes pretty much that sounds like we can work something out' 'Would you be willing to let me have all the firewood and you could take 2 of the food and 2 of the water?'
Utterance: 'No I can't do that unfortunately./'
[A]: No


[Q]: Context: 'Okay, well if you need water and firewood, that only leaves food. If you can part with extra food, here's what I'm proposing' 'Yes you can definitely have all the food. Maybe 2 firewoods and 2 waters for me?' 'Sounds good to me.'
Utterance: 'Ok great would it be ok if we have 1 of the foods?'
[A]: No


[Q]: Context: 'That doesn't sound like something I can agree to. Do you have any other ideas?' 'I can keep 2 of the firewood then and offer you 2 of the food. I'd take the water, 2 firewood and 1 water' 'I would do 3 firewood, 2 water and 2 food.'
Utterance: 'I can't do that. Truth is I need the firewood and I was hoping you didn't need it. I propose I keep 1 firewood, 3 waters and 2 food and you take the rest?'
[A]:
Yes