In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: threat and non-threat. Threat is a statement that someone will be hurt or harmed, especially if the person does not do something in particular.

[Q]: Comment: the ONLY hope we in Canada can hope for is that someone kills trump BEFORE he gets into power.  he is the most terrifying so called person ever to be the so called president of the usa,
[A]: Threat


[Q]: Comment: Always:  I am sure you are aware of this that in trading comments   with FishOrSpoon and Old Soul,  that you are conversing with  POT HEAD DRUGGIES.

Read the Sign:  POT HEAD DRUGGIES.  

And, until our Federal Government approves of this DRUG use, they are POT HEAD DRUGGIES.
[A]: Non-threat


[Q]: Comment: What exactly is your complaint? Is it that you're certain that police are doing their jobs and this is a waste of time? That any case marked "unfounded" is probably unfounded? 
I've gotta ask, since my first reaction to your risibly reactive post is that this subject is to you as a red flag is to a big, dumb bull. You charge, coz man, it makes you MAD! 
But why does it make you mad?
Why *does* BC have 1/3 the unfounded rate of New Brunswick? Are NB women three times as likely to lie? Or are NB police three times as likely to be dismissive of sexual assault complaints?
Don't you think that's worth looking into?
And if not, why?
[A]:
Non-threat