The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.

[Q]: Context: 'How about I take all the water and firewood, you can have all the food.'
Utterance: 'I need water and firewood. I don't need as much food. I need water for my dog and firewood for warmth since I am camping during the winter'
[A]: Yes


[Q]: Context: 'Maybe I could take 2 firewood 2 food and 0 waters?' 'I was planning on staying up all night and keeping my fire going all night.  Honestly I could give you all the extra food if that helps you if I could please have the 3 firewood?  We could split the waters' 'I'll only give you all the firewood if you give me everything else. I know it's your top priority😮'
Utterance: 'How about I take all the wood, give you all the food, you can have 2 waters and I can have one.  Having a little extra water will help me with all the hiking we will be doing, plus since i wont be eating much I want to stay hydrated.  Will that work for you>>🙂'
[A]: No


[Q]: Context: 'That sounds good but I need two foods please.' 'Hmm. :( How about I get 2 food and you get 1? That way it'll be slightly more equal' 'Since you are getting two firewoods I need two foods Let's deal on this.'
Utterance: 'Ok. Then how about I get two waters. I need the food, too. I got four mouths to feed. '
[A]:
Yes