Given a document, an entity and its sentiment towards the entity, verify if it is the correct sentiment towards the entity. Answer should be yes or no. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Cristiano Ronaldo is Positive . DORTMUND  Germany (Reuters) - Cristiano Ronaldo scored twice in his 150th European appearance to give Real Madrid a 3-1 victory at Borussia Dortmund  their first against them in Germany  and make it two wins out of two matches in their Champions League Group H.
Soccer Football - Champions League - Borussia Dortmund vs Real Madrid - Westfalenstadion  Dortmund  Germany - September 26  2017 Real Madrid’s Cristiano Ronaldo celebrates scoring their second goal with Gareth Bale REUTERS/Leon Kuegeler
Daniel Carvajal responded with a fine solo effort and  Ronaldo  also came close a little later but the Spaniards were lucky not to concede a penalty when Ramos cleared a Maximilian Philipp effort on the line with his hand.
Soccer Football - Champions League - Borussia Dortmund vs Real Madrid - Westfalenstadion  Dortmund  Germany - September 26  2017 Real Madrid’s  Cristiano Ronaldo  celebrates scoring their third goal with Sergio Ramos and Luka Modric REUTERS/Leon Kuegeler
“We had our chances but Real did it really well ” said Dortmund’s Gonzalo Castro. “With players like Bale and  Ronaldo  they really know how to take advantage of the gaps. It is too dangerous against such teams to stand too high up the pitch.”
It was Real who scored again when Bale was given far too much space to cut in and find  Ronaldo  in the heart of the box in the 50th.
The Germans quickly pulled a goal back with Aubameyang stabbing in a Castro cross to keep the game tight  until  Ronaldo  broke clear and fired in their third goal and their 14th in the last seven Champions League matches.
yes

Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Steve Bannon is Neutral . The attempts to curtail testimony to congressional investigators became clear this week when  former White House chief strategist Steve Bannon  appeared before the House Intelligence Committee and infuriated both sides of the aisle by refusing to answer questions about  his  work during the presidential transition and in the White House.
At some points during  Bannon 's six hours of closed-door testimony   his  attorney took breaks to confer via telephone with the White House counsel's office to clarify what questions could be answered and came back with the same guidance:  Bannon  could not discuss any activities related to the transition or  his  tenure in the White House.
 Bannon 's team negotiated ground rules with the White House counsel's office the week prior to his appearance before the House Intelligence Committee  according to a source familiar with the situation.
The President's personal legal team was aware of discussions between the White House counsel's office and  Bannon 's lawyer about protecting a possible privilege claim. But it wasn't their decision  according to a person familiar with the discussions. The protection of the privilege is a matter for the White House  not the President's legal team  because it relates to the office.
Before the hearing   Bannon 's lawyer informed a staff member of Rep. Devin Nunes  the California Republican who chairs the House Intelligence Committee  that  Bannon  planned to claim executive privilege on topics beyond the presidential campaign  a source said.
But that information was apparently tightly held. "It caught me personally by surprise" that  Bannon  asserted executive privilege  said Rep. Mike Conaway  the Texas Republican leading the committee's Russia investigation.
South Carolina Rep. Trey Gowdy and Florida Rep. Tom Rooney  the other two Republicans leading the Russia probe along with Conaway  also said they weren't aware of any agreement between the White House and committee staff about the scope of  Bannon 's testimony.
"They wouldn't do that because I'd ask what I think is relevant to ask  and if you've got a legal privilege you can assert it " Gowdy said  adding that  Bannon  was in a "legally indefensible position."
As it became clear on Tuesday that  Bannon  was refusing to answer questions  the committee served  him  with a subpoena to compel  him  to divulge additional information.
But the scope of what  Bannon  was claiming was privileged shocked members from both parties.
" His  version of executive privilege is it covers the transition  the time  he  was at the White House and covers time forever " Gowdy told Fox News Wednesday. "That is no one's definition of executive privilege."
Lawmakers were also offended that  Bannon  had already divulged details about some of  his  post-campaign activities in Michael Wolff's explosive book "Fire and Fury " but then refused to discuss those events with the committee.  Bannon 's attorney also informed members that he would  in fact  answer those questions when he meets with special counsel Robert Mueller's team because executive privilege doesn't apply to Mueller's investigation.
Democrats charge that  Bannon 's appearance before the House committee marks the broadest attempt so far at using privilege to shield events that occurred from the moment Trump was elected.
Republicans haven't ruled out the possibility of holding  Bannon  in contempt  but at least one GOP member -- Gowdy -- suggested it was unlikely.
House Speaker Paul Ryan downplayed the issue of whether witnesses like  Bannon  might be abusing the bounds of executive privilege.
Still   Bannon 's stonewalling sparked a sharp warning from Conaway -- the Republican leading the House Russia probe -- to White House aides who might follow the Bannon model: "We're going to insist on getting questions we need to answer our report."
yes

Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Brett Ratner is Positive . Actress Gal Gadot has confirmed that  Hollywood producer Brett Ratner  will not be involved in the “Wonder Woman” sequel  calling the decision “the right thing to do” after multiple women have come forward with sexual harassment allegations against  him .
WATCH: Gal Gadot responds to report she didn’t want to work with Brett Ratner  who has faced sexual harassment allegations  on next installment of Wonder Woman pic.twitter.com/rBuSH2CE2Z — TODAY (@TODAYshow) November 15  2017
“She’s tough and stands by her principles. She also knows the best way to hit people like Brett Ratner is in the wallet ” a source with Warner Bros. told the publication.
David M. Benett via Getty Images Actress Gal Gadot has confirmed that accused sexual harasser Brett Ratner will not be involved in the "Wonder Woman" sequel.
“Wonder Woman” director Patty Jenkins also recently said on Twitter that the allegations against  Ratner  have left her “extremely distressed.” She added that she stands with and defends “all of the men and women who are revealing these horrific encounters all over this industry and this world.”
Jenkins’ statement came after she presented  Ratner  with an award at the Jewish National Fund dinner. Gadot  who was initially scheduled to present it  backed out at the last minute  Variety reported.
Michael Kovac via Getty Images More than a half a dozen women have come forward with disturbing allegations against Hollywood producer and director Brett Ratner.
Last month  former marketing executive Melanie Kohler wrote a Facebook post in which she accused  Ratner  of raping her over a decade ago. An attorney for  Ratner  denied the allegation and served Kohler with a defamation lawsuit  ABC News reported.
The Los Angeles Times published allegations last week from six women who say they were either sexually harassed or abused by  Ratner  in some way.
Those women include actress Natasha Henstridge  who accused  Ratner  of masturbating in front of her and then forcing her to perform oral sex on him in the early 1990s. Olivia Munn also accused him of masturbating in front of her between the 1990s and early 2000s.
 Ratner ’s attorney  Martin Singer  “categorically” denied the accusations printed in the Times.

yes