In this task, you must classify if a given review is positive/negative, indicating your answer as P or N.

[Q]: written by mark rosenthal and lawrence konner starring charlize theron , bill paxton , david paymer as reviewed by james brundage
i 'm beginning to get fed up .
over my four years as a critic , the thing which has kept me going is the moderate balance of films .
the good balances the bad .
i try to see both in equal proportions .
but disney 's mighty joe young remake marks the fourth week in which i have n't seen a truly terrible movie .
it 's a backwards machismo , i suppose , the urge to see the things which you so loathe ; but i need to see a bad film every once in a while .
and , you know what , mighty joe young does n't qualify .
far from being bad , mighty joe young is actually a family fun movie .
it 's enjoyable , appropriate , cute , cuddly , and all of those other things that i 've been seeing in every movie since a bug 's life .
mighty joe young tracks a 2 , 000 pound gorilla in the wilds of africa that is taken to a reserve in .
. .
california ? .
.
. for safe - keeping .
okay .
a little unrealistic , but who ever said a kid 's movie had to have the slightest hint of realism .
the first half of the movie is a gorillas in the mist - esque hatred of poachers woman - of - the - wild motif .
the second half is a straight up parody of king kong , awestruck onlookers and all .
mark one down .
i 'm feeling relaxed .
it is , as a point of fact , an extremely un - creative movie .
but , as a vetern , i can say quite honestly that creativity does n't count for as much as it should .
so that saves mighty joe from my wrath , although my colleagues and cohorts and surely bashing this film at this very moment .
this is not the film to take a girl on a date to .
it 's not the film for you .
it 's the film for you and your family .
when you 're right alongside your kid , all of the normal rights and wrongs slip away .
the same thing happens when you watch a horror movie or an action flick .
it becomes fun .
all you have to do to enjoy mighty joe young is shut up and watch .
[A]: P


[Q]: apparantly money talks .
. .
and uses quite a bit of obscenities doing so !
i 've always considered myself pretty open about the gratuity a film can possess , whether in language , violence , sex , or what have you .
i find that this fact gives me a little more leverage to complain when a movie goes overboard , and money talks definitely does !
it 's not so much that the movie swore nearly constantly ( and i mean constantly ! ) , but it swore so much that it seemed overly prominent and way too staged .
perhaps if one character were foul mouthed , but in this film , everybody swears nearly every other word .
money talks is about a black ticket scalper named franklin hatchett ( played less annoyingly than expected by chris tucker ) .
franklin is your typical con - man and ends up with more than one person out to get him .
when the plot finally gets underway , there 's no less than three people ( or groups ) that want him , dead or alive .
the frenchman who 's somewhat responsible for franklin 's escape from a prisoner - packed bus , a hoodlum whom franklin owes seven grand , and the cops who wrongly suspect him of murder .
franklin 's only hope : james russell ( charlie sheen ) , an investigative reporter for the local news who 's out to prove himself a worthy journalist .
james offers to help clear franklin 's name if franklin will just allow him an exclusive report to help channel 12 conquer sweeps week .
both of these elements are completely lost along the way however , and never do reappear .
as expected , the odd couple of franklin and james do wind up friends at the end , which is another wasted element seeing as how they show no signs of becoming friends at any point along the way .
there is just nothing original or intriguing about this film , and so many developments are either non - relevant , or just plain forgotten about . money talks is a paint - by - numbers movie that lacks any real involvment with the audience . frivilous dialogue , a predictable , flat storyline , and two - dimensional characters make money talks a reason to save your money .
[A]: N


[Q]: of the major horror sub - genres , vampire movies are easily the most adaptable .
think about it .
frankenstein movies have n't changed all that much because they still need that mad - scientist - in - bavarian - castle setting . if you made a frankenstein movie today , you 'd have to have the monster be a virus or something -- and outside of michael j .
fox , there are n't any actors that could play a virus convincingly .
movies about mummies would still have to be set in egypt .
there 's not much you can do with werewolves except take them to london or paris , unless you want to have a teenage werewolf or something .
( and there 's that michael
j .
fox thing again . )
but you can have vampires do anything , and you can place them in any genre you want , just about .
you can have traditional vampire movies ( bram stoker 's dracula ) or have the anne rice version ( interview with the vampire ) , or play it for laughs ( vampire in brooklyn ) .
you can put vampires in locales from sunny southern california ( the lost boys ) to squalid mexican dives ( from dusk till dawn ) to your local high school ( buffy , the vampire slayer ) .
were it not redundant , you could have a movie about a law firm full of vampires .
any day now , i expect we 'll see a movie about a vampire third baseman who has to decide whether to play a day game in order to break the home run record .
or , you can insert the vampire legend into a hong kong action movie -- and when you do that , you get blade .
wesley snipes has the chow yun fat role in this movie -- the silent , expressionless hit man who destroys everything in his path .
in this case , the everything happens to be vampires that explode into cgi shards instead of dead , bleeding corpses .
snipes has less to say here than as the fugitive in u . s . marshals , but does a demonstrably better job here as a half - vampire wreaking vengeance on the bloodsuckers .
blade is a silent , brooding presence , laying waste to vampires without a shred of remorse .
he is as cold as his silver - bladed sword , as single minded as his garlic - filled bullets .
yet , he 's not without quirks :
blade drives a battered muscle car and has to glean rolex watches from his vampire victims in order to stay solvent .
like any good hong kong movie , blade is heavy on the chopsocky action .
for some reason , blade spends a lot more time using his kung fu artistry than using the traditional anti - vampire weapons of garlic and silver .
( blade dismisses a man - portable arc lamp as being too heavy , although it looks to be a more efficient tool to dispatch vampires . )
unfortunately , the guiding hand of john woo is absent from this film , relegating blade to the status of the replacement killers , which it most strongly resembles .
the replacement killers is the last movie i saw that i did n't review -- mostly because it made no impression on me , and i could n't remember anything other than noise , violence , and the intensity of fat 's performance .
blade has a little more going for it , and has the vampire myth to draw from -- but other than that , it 's the same kind of movie -- exciting , with well choreographed action scenes ,
but with no resonance .
with a stronger villain ( stephen dorff is ( pardon the pun ) curiously bloodless as the head vampire , leaving us to wonder what denis leary might have done with the role ) , a wittier script , and a strong supporting cast , blade might have been able to rise beyond the level of commonplace summer entertainment .
as it is , blade is an average action movie that serves to do nothing but remind us that the summer movies just keep getting dumber and
the vampire movies just keep multiplying .
[A]:
P