In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: threat and non-threat. Threat is a statement that someone will be hurt or harmed, especially if the person does not do something in particular.

[Q]: Comment: "Soylent Orange" is Trumpism. Sessions said "it's an honor to be able to SERVE you". Really? you swore an oath to serve our country, not a demagogue. Your loyalty is required to be to our constitutional principles, not to any person. 
That ridiculous 'fawning fan fest of flattery' was the most embarrassing and gratuitous display of brown-nosing I have ever witnessed. Does this weak leader have no humility? Does his fragile egomania require constant praise?
[A]: Non-threat


[Q]: Comment: Kag, you are exactly right. I should have mentioned that Stefanini was not in a relationship  when he was nominated.  Two theories, equally repugnant, were advanced to explain the Vatican's refusal to accept him:
1.  France had recently legalized same-sex marriage.
2.  Stefanini could have -- gasp! -- choosen to marry while serving as ambassador.
[A]: Non-threat


[Q]: Comment: So Christians think they can call others 'retard' and keep the high moral ground? Back into your basket....
[A]:
Non-threat