In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: toxic and non-toxic. Toxicity is defiend as anything that is rude, disrespectful, or unreasonable that would make someone want to leave a converation.

Comment: Guest: "For 2 years running JD Powers has these same models"
.
That's funny. Not long ago, you described the problems per vehicles as "not worth mentioning". Why did you mention JD Power now?
Non-toxic

Comment: It's too bad Jesus didn't just straight up say "don't be an asshole" in those exact words, because that would probably help keep guys like this from acting like assholes.
Toxic

Comment: " China is very committed to the Paris Climate Change Agreement "
China committed to nothing except business as usual.
"In recent years, the Obama administration has sought to highlight cooperation on climate change, but China’s commitments, first made in 2014, have been less a concession to American pressure than a restatement of its own goals. They include a promise for China’s carbon emissions to reach a plateau or decline “around 2030,” but without any specific target for reductions like those Mr. Obama pledged for the United States (between 26 and 28 percent of 2005 levels by 2025). That means China has plenty of room to continue burning fossil fuels to power its economy."
see: Rare Harmony as China and U.S. Commit to Climate Deal @ NYTimes 09/03/16
Lets not forget about this either
see:China Burns Much More Coal Than Reported, Complicating Climate Talks@ NYTimes 11/03/15
Under reporting must be part of there commitment.

Non-toxic