Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.

[EX Q]: Cricket brownies with "organic gluten-free flour and organic Peruvian cocoa powder."

How very progressive and Earth-friendly!

"The products are expensive..."

And, like all  progressive and Earth-friendly silliness,  this stuff is only for the wealthy.
[EX A]: No

[EX Q]: You and your racist friends are the ones who can leave the country . The government should round all you chain smoking beer guzzling food stamp wasting losers and drop you in the middle of ISIS land along with the Dump
[EX A]: Yes

[EX Q]: So I've known and worked with Forest for a long time, he has spent most of his life in the woods.  Speculating on what happened in inappropriate and disrespectful.  

First off University employees regularly carry shotguns for bear protection.  You are totally wrong in your assumption.  

Second, on a multi day backpacking trip in the mountains the chance of running into a bear in a group of 12 is insanely low.  Carrying a shotgun would be so much more dangerous than any of the other alternatives.  The UAS ODS program has been tromping around Southeast Alaska for 15 odd years, and this is the first negative interaction with a bear, and no students got hurt.  This is a one in a million type event.  And I hope everyone joins me in wishing Forest a speedy recovery.
[EX A]:
Yes