instruction:
In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.
question:
Comment: There is no question that a poll of "Teen Vogue" readers would come up with an answer for the hints "Justin" and "Canada" in a survey.....
answer:
Non-sexual-explicit


question:
Comment: Donald Trump and a Turd Sandwich walk into restaurant. Donald orders prime rib, a bottle of ketchup, and a beautiful slice of chocolate cake. He leaves a yuge tip. The turd sandwich orders coffee and a donut and leaves a 50 cent tip. Their waitress says, "I hope that orange buffoon never comes here again."
answer:
Non-sexual-explicit


question:
Comment: This letter shows the danger of speculation in the absence of facts. There is no evidence whatsoever to indicate that these acts were carried out by Jews, "libruls", Trump opponents or anyone except who they appear to have been done by: American Neo-Nazis. Yet the author starts with this screwball assumption, references the demented musings of our wannabe dictator, and then concludes that the victim is the perpetrator. 

It is not impossible that the unlikely scenario that Stahl postulates is true. It has happened before. However, most prudent people would wait for at least a shred of supporting evidence to emerge before making such an outrageous claim.
answer:

Non-sexual-explicit