Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.

[Q]: Boozer: tompaine2 makes a very good point here.  Often the "rich and successful" believe they're really special.....some would use the phrase "Hot S@#$" .  The MW's on-line dictionary reads..  "Simple Definition of hubris : a great or foolish amount of pride or confidence"  You take two parts Anger, combine them with one part Hubris, and it often produces really "stupid" actions.
[A]: Yes


[Q]: Please explain why this event requires an endorsement for any kind of protest. Campaign visits to Eugene by presidential candidates Bill Clinton and Barack Obama were met here with lollipops and rainbows (and in the latter case, ice cream cones and a basketball jersey). Upon each's somber return in the wake of the Thurston and UCC shootings, protestors were derided for not respecting the office; you were near the front of that parade of criticism last fall.

I'm not 73, have never protested anything and have never believed telling others how to live is being a good neighbor, never mind a responsible citizen. However, I've long had a fascination with successful people, regardless of their political stripe, who somehow possess the mettle to move mountains. That includes Clinton and Obama, among many others.

Like it or not, Trump has accomplished something quite remarkable. That flaccid guarantee of contentiousness for his visit is not.
[A]: No


[Q]: hey, y'all still there?  i'm not liking the limited character feature.  I know some posts get overly long  - surely some of mine do - but let people just pass on it if they choose.  to want to add  truly 3 or 4  more words, or even letters, to a post and be stopped, stinks.   and still not liking the peer review stuff - I think it is most likely a click click reaction from most users by now.
[A]:
No