We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

[Q]: Sent1: Therefore, the Death Penalty stands as a humane form of justice.
 Sent2: IMO the death penalty is about justice for the loved ones of the victims.
[A]: Similar


[Q]: Sent1: I'm not saying that a child's life is worth more than an adults, I'm saying if they killed any one they forfeit their life, because they in return lose what they took from someone else.
 Sent2: Like I said, if the person isn't convicted, then they will not be murdered in the electric chair, or by lethal injection.
[A]: Not similar


[Q]: Sent1: If they don't want to kill an innocent person, stick to life in prison.
 Sent2: Only if they try to murder somebody after they are in prison do they deserve the death penalty?
[A]:
Not similar