In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

[Q]: Sentence: Bill passed the half-empty plate to John because he was hungry.
 Reason: The 'he' refers to john because john was very hungry so that bill passed the half empty plate. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
[A]: Correct


[Q]: Sentence: I stuck a pin through a carrot. When I pulled the pin out, it left a hole.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the pin because it was pulled out with a pin instead of a carrot. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
[A]: Wrong


[Q]: Sentence: If the con artist has succeeded in fooling Sam, he would have gotten a lot of money.
 Reason: The 'he' refers to the con artist because he is more of a 'he' than a 'she. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
[A]:
Wrong