In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: threat and non-threat. Threat is a statement that someone will be hurt or harmed, especially if the person does not do something in particular.

[Q]: Comment: Shame on you RG!  "Big Pay Increases"!? Biased and shameful article. You've lost my business this week. It's a shame it has come to this and those that will suffer are our community workers and the public they serve on a daily basis. Do your homework before declaring these people can just be replaced...there have been a multitude of positions open for years and many have been doing the job of two to three due to vacancies. If you all think this is such a cush job and don't mind making considerably less than the private sector employees then why haven't you applied?  I'm not going to look the other way while our county commissioners get huge pay raises and want to grumble about a 2% cost of living raise. Anyone tried to rent a house in Eugene lately? These people deserve to pay their bills and feed their families like everyone else.
[A]: Non-threat


[Q]: Comment: Let's not even begin to talk about " the family wealth " comment or  the reporter who broke the lumber loop hole used to minimize the tax burden on Trudeau family  cottage. 
Yes 1st Kathleen and her $15 dollar minimum wage and now a desperate Liberal party attacking the back bone of this county. 
I have said it a million times, the government won the last election and the tax payers lost. 
I have zero regard for the establishment and those who are there useful idiots. 
SHAME!!!!
[A]: Non-threat


[Q]: Comment: So attempting to understand your post, the second amendment is a limit on government so this isn't an free speech issue exactly.  We will assume that you think it is OK to run wild threatening and screeching at people just because you don't agree with their politics.

From your post I assume you have a subjective world view, meaning that when you get over it is OK because you are right by nature of being right... but lets say another group with entitlement issues such as yours runs amok in an event you are into.  Lets say a pro-choice event was attacked by equally unhinged cry bullies that were pro-life, would you be so forgiving or would you be outraged?

Would you be upset that your event was ruined by people with the emotional maturity of a tween, or would you take it as a learning lesson?  You would be OK that you were stood up to by people who were not out of line?
[A]:
Non-threat