We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Example Input: Sent1: I think instead of a death penalty, they should just stay in prison until they die because putting someone to death is just harsh, No matter who it is.
 Sent2: For some people death penalty is better than life in prison, who are respect their freedom and who are consider that it is better to die than someone to judge them.
Example Output: Not similar

Example Input: Sent1: I mean the death penalty is giving them a passage out of trouble, they wouldn't have to deal with the effects they had on the world.
 Sent2: Like I said I would just want them to actually have to deal with the consequences and not get an easy out, which is what executing them does.
Example Output: Similar

Example Input: Sent1: States without the death penalty have fared BETTER in reducing their murder rates than states with the death penalty.
 Sent2: But are there any stats available showing countries/states with the death penalty have a higher/lower crime rate?
Example Output:
Similar