In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

Sentence: Bob paid for Charlie's college education, but now Charlie acts as though it never happened. He is very hurt.
 Reason: The 'He' refers to bob because Charlie is the one who acts like it never happened. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Correct

Sentence: Sam broke both his ankles and he's walking with crutches. But a month or so from now they should be better.
 Reason: The 'they' refers to the ankles because THE CRUTCHES LIKELY TO REFER. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Wrong

Sentence: The large ball crashed right through the table because it was made of steel.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the large ball because The large ball   was made of steel because  it crashed right through the table. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

Correct