The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the small-talk strategy, otherwise output No. small-talk is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used for discussing topics apart from the negotiation, in an attempt to build a rapport with the opponent. For example, discussing how the opponent is doing during the pandemic or sharing excitement for the camping trip.

Q: Context: 'yeah. i need 2 firewood, 1 water and 1 food' 'I need to have 2 or 3 pieces of firewood because I did not pack any way to heat up my food without firewood.' 'I also need 2 pieces of firewood'
Utterance: 'That's unfortunate. I cannot agree to a deal without 2 pieces of firewood. I would have to walk away, but that would bee worse for both of us.'

A: No
****
Q: Context: 'Well, To be honest I plan to take the boys hiking. It's a long walk so we will need to stay hydrated. So water has to be (2) Firewood is definitely important to us, but I'm not sure we can get by on just (1) food' 'then you can get 2 food, 1 water and 2 firewoods ' 'After talking it over the boys I think with can go with 2 water 1 food and 2 firewood🙂'
Utterance: 'sounds good want to submit?'

A: No
****
Q: Context: 'I really need food too so if I can have 2 packages of food you can have 1 package of firewood and all 3 of the water.' '😮That does not work for me. May I have 3 packages of food and one package of water. You can have the rest.' 'Sorry, but I definitely can't accept not having any food. I'll take 1 package of food, and all of the firewood and then you can have the water.'
Utterance: 'Okay then shall I take 2 packages of food and all the packages of water?'

A:
No
****