The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the self-need strategy, otherwise output No. self-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to create a personal need for an item in the negotiation, such as by pointing out that the participant sweats a lot to show preference towards water packages.

Ex Input:
Context: 'Oh that's cool! I will be camping with my 4 children so having a little extra would be great for me too.' 'Ok great! Do you need firewood?' 'I could use a little to cook with, But food is my main concern. Is it hot where you will be? '
Utterance: 'Ya so I could use a lot of water! Would you be willing for me to take one food two water and two firewood? '

Ex Output:
Yes


Ex Input:
Context: 'Me too🙂. I packed a lot of food so I have plenty to spare' 'that's awesome. I think I need more food myself, but I have tons of water.' 'I really am in need of firewood and would appreciate the extra water if you can spare some'
Utterance: 'Would it be okay if I was to get 3 food packages, and spare you 3 water packages?'

Ex Output:
No


Ex Input:
Context: 'Hmm. I really need food too. I don't care much for water either. How about I take all 3 firewood, 2 food, and 1 water?' 'Yeah, that's not going to work for me.. I can give you two food if you really need it, but in exchange I'm going to need two of the water and all the firewood.  ' 'I will just take 3 firewood, 1 food, and 1 water. That work for you?'
Utterance: 'Tell you what.. now that I think about it.. you seem like you really need the firewood.. no problem.  I want you to have all 3 of them.. and you can have 1 water and 1 food, too.. does that work for you?  That would just leave me 2 food, 2 water, and no firewood.'

Ex Output:

No