We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Input: Consider Input: Sent1: The death penalty is not deterrance for the person executed.
 Sent2: Peterson could face the death penalty or life without parole.

Output: Not similar


Input: Consider Input: Sent1: If these are indeed comparable, I wouldn't argue for the death penalty even in murder.
 Sent2: I am not a pacifist, so I am not opposed to all state-sanctioned killing.

Output: Not similar


Input: Consider Input: Sent1: Killing a person for them killing someone else ( I understand this is not necessarily the criteria for receiving the death penalty) makes you no better than the executed.
 Sent2: Obviously, if someone were found innocent before execution, they would not be executed.


Output: Not similar