In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence can be inferred from the statement. Incorrect choices change the meaning in important ways or have details that are not mentioned in the statement. Indicate your answer as 1,2, or 3 corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.

Input: Consider Input: Statement: Most of the tech executives are uninterested in politics (though Case is an exception). Choices:  1. Case is interested in politics. 2. Most tech executives stay out of politics. 3. Case doesn't care who wins this election.

Output: 2


Input: Consider Input: Statement: twenty year old and he uh he's in love with this girl that's about sixteen or seventeen and they leave he's involved with like a murder and then um he they go to uh they go to like Louisiana and Texas and uh he get they get more he gets more involved with this robbery and whatever but it's sort of Choices:  1. He is innocent in Louisiana and Texas. 2. A twenty year old is in love with a younger girl. 3. A twenty year old is suspected of murder and robbery.

Output: 3


Input: Consider Input: Statement: The reasoning is that competitive pressure brings about productive efficiency, efficient price structures, product innovation, and the elimination of economic rents. Choices:  1. The pressure makes things fall apart, not work better. 2. It's because the pressure makes things more efficient. 3. It's because the pressure makes things more efficient because it pressures employees to do well to keep their jobs.


Output: 2