In this task, you are given a part of an article. Your task is to generate headline (title) for this text. Preferred headlines are under fifteen words.

Input: Consider Input: A BN20 network is a two level belief net in which parent interactions are modeled using the noisy-or interaction model. In this paper we discuss application of the SPI local expression language [1] to effi­ cient inference in large BN20 networks. In particular, we show that there is sig­ nificant structure which can be exploited to improve over the Quickscore result. We further describe how symbolic tech­ niques can provide information which can significantly reduce the computation required for computing all cause poste­ rior marginals. Finally, we present a novel approximation technique with pre­ liminary experimental results.

Output: Symbolic Probabilistic Inference in large BN20 networks


Input: Consider Input: This paper investigates neural characterbased morphological tagging for languages with complex morphology and large tag sets. We systematically explore a variety of neural architectures (DNN, CNN, CNNHighway, LSTM, BLSTM) to obtain character-based word vectors combined with bidirectional LSTMs to model across-word context in an end-to-end setting. We explore supplementary use of word-based vectors trained on large amounts of unlabeled data. Our experiments for morphological tagging suggest that for ”simple” model configurations, the choice of the network architecture (CNN vs. CNNHighway vs. LSTM vs. BLSTM) or the augmentation with pre-trained word embeddings can be important and clearly impact the accuracy. Increasing the model capacity by adding depth, for example, and carefully optimizing the neural networks can lead to substantial improvements, and the differences in accuracy (but not training time) become much smaller or even negligible. Overall, our best morphological taggers for German and Czech outperform the best results reported in the literature by a large margin.

Output: Neural Morphological Tagging from Characters for Morphologically Rich Languages


Input: Consider Input: In this paper we compare different types of recurrent units in recurrent neural networks (RNNs). Especially, we focus on more sophisticated units that implement a gating mechanism, such as a long short-term memory (LSTM) unit and a recently proposed gated recurrent unit (GRU). We evaluate these recurrent units on the tasks of polyphonic music modeling and speech signal modeling. Our experiments revealed that these advanced recurrent units are indeed better than more traditional recurrent units such as tanh units. Also, we found GRU to be comparable to LSTM.


Output: Empirical Evaluation of Gated Recurrent Neural Networks on Sequence Modeling