In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Comment: I'm for it.  What I'm against are those darn push-up bras.  That's false advertising.
Obscene

Comment: Don't cry "reverse racism" or make false equivalencies. Context matters. Saying whiteface is the same as blackface trivializes historical oppression (hello, black folks were not the slave owners/lynchers/Jim Crow enforcers). People of color are forced to assimilate themselves to the mainstream white culture in order to survive; putting on a "white face" is something we must do every day.  When a white person dons black face, they are trying on the face of the marginalized other for fun without living or experiencing racism. Not to mention the historical context of blackface. Google it.
Non-obscene

Comment: This Pribus-Scaramucci kerfuffle is identical to the Trump-Sessions kerfuffle.  It's how Trump sends the MSM down yet another rabbit hole while creating drama that facilitates the actual objective:  routing the actual lawbreakers / leakers out.  Relax Newt.  This is how a New Yorker confronts a bully:  Walk right up to them and kick the straight in the balls.  I like it.

Obscene