In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Input: Consider Input: Comment: Hogwash Gary - You cannot have your cake and eat it too. That is what I disrespect most about evolutionists, is the hypocrisy. If you are going to live by the sword, you must die by it. At least have the courage to admit and accept it. And why is sexual violence any more unacceptable that violence, the fact is you have no foundation as a Darwinist to condemn anything of this nature. If you are going to travel down this road, then you MUST defend animals we eat, and every other act of "violence" that imposes an outside will upon another being. I can discuss any topic rationally with any person, but hypocrisy is something I will not deal with.

Output: Non-sexual-explicit


Input: Consider Input: Comment: Go back to self-loathing Seattle Dave! If you want Alaska to return to its pre-white 'Eden' then you will have to go back without using any paved roads, aircraft or automobiles. Good luck.

Output: Non-sexual-explicit


Input: Consider Input: Comment: Eric Probst

1 minute ago

Dumb non story. If he had been critical of her libtards would be furious. Perfect example of fake news trying to create a narrative that doesn't exist.


Output: Non-sexual-explicit