We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Example Input: Morally, I do not believe in eye for an eye, because it would leave the whole world blind.
Example Output: Valid

Example Input: The bottom line is that reduction of crime (which still has yet to be fully proven for the death penalty) is not enough - the punishment has to be judged on its own merits and morality.
Example Output: Valid

Example Input: And not just because it offers some small relief to the family of the victim, but also one lest a-hole we all have to worry about.
Example Output:
Valid