Given a document and an entity the task is to select the author's sentiment towards the entity. Sentiments can be Positive, Neutral and Negative. Select Positive if the article expresses a positive view towards the given entity or praises its quality or skills. Select Neutral if the document expresses no clear view towards the entity or has equal amounts of positive and negative statements or expressing some fact/quote by someone else. Select Negative if the article expresses a negative view towards like harsh remarks, criticizing entities action/decision etc. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

Example Input: What is the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Antonin Scalia ? With “Scalia Speaks: Reflections on Law  Faith  and Life Well Lived ” Christopher J. Scalia and Edward Whelan have given us a treasure that captures Justice Antonin Scalia’s brilliance  wit  faith  humility and wide range of knowledge. When I read this collection of his speeches  edited by the justice’s son and one of his law clerks  I feel like  Scalia  is in the room with me. Taken together  the speeches are a book-length argument for constitutional originalism and for  Scalia ’s understanding of the role of judges in the United States. Anyone who wants to understand Scalia as a person and as a judicial philosopher should start by reading this book.
[ Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia  dies at 79]
 Scalia   in my view  is the best justice who has ever served on the Supreme Court in its 227-year history.  He  and Justice Joseph Story are the only two justices to have published books on constitutional and statutory interpretation.  Scalia  articulated a clear philosophy of a judge’s role  to which  he  always adhered.  He  was one of the two best writers ever to serve on the court and was equal on this score to Justice Robert Jackson  known for  his  fine literary style. No other justice traveled so much and spoke to so many audiences in the United States and abroad. Finally   he  was to originalism what Saint Paul was to Christianity — a tireless and widely traveled evangelist of the gospel. Understanding Scalia is thus imperative for all law students  lawyers and educated lay people. Because the book is a collection of speeches  many of which were given to lay people  it is very readable  understandable and fun for most age groups.
“ Scalia  Speaks ” by Antonin Scalia  Edited by Christopher Scalia (Crown Forum)
Addressing the difference between American and European values   Scalia  notes that “the United States was settled primarily by people seeking  in one way or another  refuge from the ways of Europe. The men who founded our Republic did not aspire to emulating Europeans at all — to the contrary  the project of drafting the American Constitution was largely about ensuring that the American people would never languish under the yoke of a European-style government.”
This is a critically important point that many fail to appreciate. The legal academics and public intellectuals who love European socialism overlook the fact that the United States  under its unique Constitution  is the third-most-populous country in the world  covering the fourth-largest territory  and has by far the highest gross domestic product per capita of any of the Group of 20 nations  a strength that allows us to do more to help the poor around the world while offering military defense to a range of countries. Few people choose to move from the United States to other countries  but millions of people want to live here.  Scalia  appreciated that the reason for this is that the U.S. Constitution is an engine of power and economic growth that sustains “life  liberty and the pursuit of happiness.”
As an excellent writer   Scalia  offers advice on the craft. “Time and sweat ”  he  says  are the keys to good writing  and a well-written document emerges only after many drafts. “I think there is writing genius ” he  says  just as there is musical genius  “which consists primarily  I think  of the ability to place oneself in the shoes of one’s audience; to assume only what they assume; to anticipate what they anticipate  to explain what they need explained  to think what they must be thinking; to feel what they must be feeling.”
 Scalia  regrets that most American college and law students never read the Federalist Papers and therefore do not understand our Constitution or the American founding very well.  He  tirelessly urges us to learn from the wisdom of the framers of our Constitution  which so few Americans tend to do.
In a chapter on “Original Meaning ” Scalia reveals that at a conference  he challenged Attorney General Edwin Meese III on how to assess the Constitution’s original intent. Meese argued in favor of a judicial philosophy that searched for the original intentions of the framers. Scalia said he favored searching for the original meaning of the words of the Constitution instead. In his speech at the conference  he strongly set out the case for original public meaning  persuading Meese’s chief of staff  Ken Cribb  by the force of his argument. After  Scalia  finished speaking  Cribb scrawled the word “Stipulated” on a piece of paper and taped it to the podium. Two days later  President Ronald Reagan informed  Scalia  that  he  was going to be nominated to the Supreme Court.
 Scalia  speaks in  his  own words in this magnificent volume that should be on the bookshelf of every educated American.
Example Output: Positive

Example Input: What is the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Mousa Dembele ? London (AFP) â Kevin De Bruyne was the creative fulcrum of Manchester Cityâs latest demolition job  while Mousa Dembele inspired Tottenhamâs north London derby triumph.
 Dembele  the midfield maestro
 Mousa Dembele  underlined  his  status as one of Tottenhamâs unsung heroes with a dominant display in their 1-0 win over north London rivals Arsenal. It was Harry Kaneâs latest goal-scoring exploits against the Gunners that took centre-stage at Wembley  but the platform of that success was built by  the industrious Dembele . Embodying Mauricio Pochettinoâs obsession with physical intensity  while more than capable of picking a decisive pass  Dembele out-shone Arsenal in the midfield engine room  earning praise from  his  manager. âLast season  he  played so well  this season  he  suffered a problem in  his  ankle and struggled in pre-season. Now  he  is playing well again â Pochettino said. â He  is an unbelievable player. We have to be careful about  his  fitness. When  he  can train  he  can make this type of performance.â
As if losing 1-0 to struggling Newcastle wasnât enough to have Jose Mourinho seething  the Manchester United boss once again had to suffer the frustration of  Paul  Pogbaâs latest flop. Mourinho had restored Pogba to the starting line-up after dropping him for Unitedâs previous match â a decision inspired by the former Juventus midfielderâs limp efforts in a defeat at Tottenham. But rather than grasp the opportunity to get back in Mourinhoâs good books just days after his boss had defended their relationship  Pogba was again a largely anonymous figure at St Jamesâ Park. By the time he was substituted midway through the second half  United were already trailing  but publicly at least  Mourinho remains supportive. âNo problems â he said when asked about the France international. âI wanted a better way (in midfield) against a side that was defending in a block. I wanted the simplicity of Michael Carrick.â
Example Output: Positive

Example Input: What is the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Pope Francis ? Such is the situation in Peru and Chile  where  Pope Francis  is paying a visit this week. However beneficent  his  reputation  the sordid past of such men and institutions keeps coming back to afflict  his  papacy like a recurrent  debilitating disease.
Things arenât much better for the pope in Chile  where  Francis  will begin  his  official apostolic visit when  he  arrives Monday evening.
 Francis  recently appointed controversial Bishop Juan Barros to head the diocese of the city of Osorno in the south of the country  even though Barros worked directly under Fernando Karadima  a priest convicted of sexual abuse by the Vatican and sentenced to the usual âlife of prayer and penitenceâ in a secluded monastery. Barros denies knowing of Karadimaâs crimes  even though he is named by several witnesses as ultimately aiding in the cover-up  and sent a letter to the Vatican in support of the known predator during the Vaticanâs investigation.
According to documents seen by the Associated Press   Francis  considered sending Barros on a sabbatical to avoid any potential dust-up among abuse survivors but  as the AP reports  it was a decision â he  didn't ultimately take.â
Last Friday  four Catholic churches in Santiago were firebombed ahead of the popeâs visit. A note left behind in the Santa Isabel de HungrÃ­a church used Spanish orthography changed to eliminate masculine and feminine gender  declaring  for example  âWe will never submit to the dominion they want to exercise over our bodies [nuestrxs cuerpxs]... â It concluded  â Pope Francis   the next bombs will be in your cassock.â
 Francis  has been widely criticized for  his  mixed messaging on clerical sex abuse.  He  has not yet renewed the mandate of  his  commission on clerical sex abuse  which expired on Dec. 17. Peter Saunders  a victim of clerical sex abuse and member of the commission who had been on leave for the better part of the year  officially resigned from the commission in December  citing âdisappointment that that commission had not done moreâ as  his  primary reason.  He  has been invited by protesters in Chile to join the demonstrations to stand in solidarity with victims in protests against the pontiff.
 The pope  will begin  his  apostolic visit late Monday evening in Chile before moving on to Peru later in the week.  He  will return to Rome Jan. 21.
Example Output:
Neutral