Given a document, an entity and its sentiment towards the entity, verify if it is the correct sentiment towards the entity. Answer should be yes or no. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

Input: Consider Input: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Tina Brown is Positive . Former Vanity Fair editor Tina Brown couldn’t please everyone. In her timely new book  “The Vanity Fair Diaries ” she recalls a run-in with gossip legend Liz Smith  who died over the weekend at 94.
According to  Brown   Smith’s girlfriend Iris Love submitted a story about her trip up the Nile to Vanity Fair in 1985  shortly after  Brown  had started her new job.
“Trouble is  picture’s great  copy not  ” Brown  recalled. According to  Brown   31 at the time  she decided to run the piece anyway  but only after a heavy edit that she knew would not go over well with Smith. As expected  Smith “got on the horn to give me the full Texan bawl-out.”
In her new book  Tina Brown recounts a run-in with the late gossip great Liz Smith  seen here at an event in March. (Gary Gershoff/WireImage)

Output: yes


Input: Consider Input: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Luciano MenÃ©ndez is Positive . Luciano MenÃ©ndez  a former Argentine general convicted of  his  role in the killings and forced disappearances of political adversaries under the military junta that ruled from 1976 to 1983  died Feb. 27 in a military hospital in the city of Cordoba.  He  was 90.
Argentine media reported the death and said  he  had been hospitalized for coronary and biliary conditions.
 Mr. MenÃ©ndez  who was born into a military family   was one of the most bloodthirsty leaders of a violent dictatorship. Government death squads and paramilitary forces did their utmost best to eradicate armed leftist groups as well as political rivals and others they came to suspect of being dissidents  including artists  authors  academics  social workers  labor unionists and journalists.
During this period  which came to be known as the âdirty war â  Mr. MenÃ©ndez  was the head of the Third Army Corps  commanding 10 Argentine provinces and overseeing the largest detention center  La Perla  in Cordoba  which one witness called âa factory of death.â
Former Gen. Luciano Menendez  right  talks with  his  attorney Horacio Guerineau at a courthouse in San Miguel de Tucuman  northern Argentina  in 2008. (Julio Pantoja/ASSOCIATED PRESS)
 Mr. MenÃ©ndez  presented  himself  as a Cold Warrior who saw  himself  as a bulwark against communism  at all costs. âWe are going to have to kill 50 000 people: 25 000 subversives  20 000 sympathizers  and we will make 5 000 mistakes â  he  was widely quoted as telling  his  men.
 Mr. MenÃ©ndez  laughed during torture sessions  earning the nickname the âHyena â according to the Agence France-Presse.  He  later defended  his  brutal actions as necessary measures to prevent leftist guerrillas from obtaining power. âThese were not peaceful citizens â  he  said in 2010  according to the Associated Press.
In 2016   Mr. MenÃ©ndez  was convicted of 52 homicides  260 kidnappings  656 torture cases and 82 disappearances of people who were never found  the AFP reported at the time. At  his  trial   he  said there was ânever repression of any kindâ at La Perla. âThese criminals accuse the armed forces and go to the courts saying theyâre victims.â
 Mr. MenÃ©ndez  was given 14 prison terms and 12 life sentences  more than any other military leader of the dictatorship  according to the Spanish-language news agency EFE.
 Luciano BenjamÃ­n MenÃ©ndez  was born June 19  1927  in San Martin  a suburb of Buenos Aires.  He  was a nephew of Gen. BenjamÃ­n MenÃ©ndez  who tried unsuccessfully to overthrow President Juan Domingo PerÃ³n in 1951  and a cousin of Gen. Mario MenÃ©ndez  who became the military governor of the Falkland Islands while Argentina briefly occupied the archipelago in 1982.
 His  wife  Edith AngÃ©lica Abarca  died in 2012. A complete list of survivors was not immediately available.
Amid increased international attention to human rights violations in Argentina  many leaders attempted to pay at least lip service to toning down extrajudicial killings.  Mr. MenÃ©ndez  was the exception.
 He  accused Roberto Viola  commander in chief of the army  of âinadmissible toleranceâ toward âMarxist subversionâ and led a brief and failed insurrection to oust him in 1979  The Washington Post reported in 1979. As a result   Mr. MenÃ©ndez  was imprisoned for 90 days and forced into retirement.
After the Falklands debacle  the regime crumbled  and Argentina returned to democracy. Over the next years   he  was called to testify about  his  involvement in human rights crimes. At one hearing in 1984   he  was seen being restrained by aides after  he  drew  his  parachutistâs knife in response to protesters taunting  him ;  he  claimed that  he  was protecting  his  wife and daughter against âanother attack on the armed forcesâ by leftist sympathizers. A photo of the incident came to be seen as emblematic of  his  brutish temperament.

Output: no


Input: Consider Input: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Juanita Broaddrick is Neutral . … How vitiated Bill Clinton seemed at the last Democratic convention. Some of his appetites  at least  had waned….With a pencil neck and a sagging jacket he clambered gamely onto the stage after Hillary’s acceptance speech and played happily with the red balloons that fell from the ceiling. When the couple repeatedly reminded the crowd of their new status as grandparents it was to suggest very different associations in voters’ minds. …Yet let us not forget the sex crimes of which the younger  stronger Bill Clinton was very credibly accused in the 1990s.  Juanita Broaddrick  reported that when  she  was a volunteer on one of  his  gubernatorial campaigns   she  had arranged to meet  him  in a hotel coffee shop. At the last minute   he  had changed the location to  her  room in the hotel  where  she  says  he  very violently raped  her .  She  said  she  fought against Clinton throughout a rape that left  her  bloodied. At a different Arkansas hotel   he  caught sight of a minor state employee named Paula Jones  and  Jones says   he  sent a couple of state troopers to invite  her  to  his  suite  where  he  exposed  his  penis to  her  and told  her  to kiss it. Kathleen Willey said that she met  him  in the Oval Office for personal and professional advice and that  he  groped  her   rubbed  his  erect penis on  her   and pushed  her  hand to  his  crotch. It was a pattern of behavior; it included an alleged violent assault; the women involved had far more credible evidence than many of the most notorious accusations that have come to light in the past five weeks. But Clinton was not left to the swift and pitiless justice that today’s accused men have experienced. Rather  he was rescued by a surprising force: machine feminism. The movement had by then ossified into a partisan operation and it was willing—eager—to let this friend of the sisterhood enjoy a little droit de seigneur.
A resolution expressing the sense of the Senate that  Juanita Broaddrick  never received a fair hearing for  her  charge of rape against the then-Attorney General of Arkansas William Jefferson Clinton  later President of the United States.
condemns the actions which  Ms. Broaddrick  alleges occurred in Little Rock  Arkansas in 1978 by then-State of Arkansas Attorney General William Jefferson Clinton as unacceptable and outrageous  to be condemned by all people of all races  creeds  and religions; pledges to do everything in its power  including holding public hearings  to probe the underlying causes of this brutal alleged rape by William Jefferson Clinton and an alleged threat to silence the victim by Hillary Rodham Clinton to make sure that the United States does not return to the days when such brutality and violence against women  along with threats to silence them  were deemed acceptable; calls on the Federal Bureau of Investigation  the Department of Justice  the White House  and all other Federal law enforcement agencies to conduct an immediate  full  and fair investigation into all of the facts of the case; calls upon each Senator and every citizen of the United States  in his or her own way  through his or her church  synagogue  mosque  workplace  or social organization  to join in denouncing and getting others to denounce this outrageous alleged rape of a defenseless woman and pledges to join in efforts to bring an end to rape and an end to the fear and hatred which underlie it  and to encourage all Americans to dedicate themselves to ending sexual violence in the United States.
Senators Mitch McConnell  John McCain  Susan Collins  and others like Ted Cruz and Mike Lee have condemned Judge Moore in the strongest terms and have called for his withdrawal from the Senate race. There should be no problem with these Senators and those who agree with them on the House side introducing identical resolutions that promise the American people and  Ms. Broaddrick  that they will at last take a serious look at  her  charges and act to educate the American people that both the Senate and the House will not stand for this kind of behavior as alleged by  Ms. Broaddrick . Or others who accused the Clintons like Paula Jones and Kathleen Willey.
Will this launch a demand from Democrats to do the same to President Trump? Doubtless — and having seen the allegations the American people elected him anyway. Nothing new has emerged since the President took office. The  Broaddrick  allegation on the other hand did not emerge until 1999  and  Broaddrick herself  says that NBC News withheld its explosive  graphic interview with  her  until it was too late to affect the Clinton impeachment trial. Bill Clinton would never be on a ballot with this spectacular charge in the public domain.
Will they do it? Will Moore opponent Doug Jones pledge to support such a resolution investigating the Clintons and the  Broaddrick  rape accusation if elected to the Senate?
But if all of a sudden so many Senators and Congressmen and Congresswomen are racing to microphones to say they are outraged? Then they need to do something about  Juanita Broaddrick  and what happened with the Clintons. To hold one hearing after another about Hollywood’s sex problem. To name names and hold people accountable.
The addition of Ted Cruz and Mike Lee to this fight bodes well for  Juanita Broaddrick  — and finally and at last holding Bill Clinton and Hillary Clinton responsible for their deeds. As even some notable liberals like the Atlantic and MSNBC’s Chris Hayes are finally doing.
The real question now? There is no excuse for this kind of behavior. Period. So where are the McCains and Flakes and other GOP insiders in and out of the Senate and the House in holding to account not just Roy Moore but their friends and fellow Establishment insiders? Will they bring about the Clinton reckoning as the Atlantic asks? Will they finally turn their Senate spotlight on the infamous Ted Kennedy/Chris Dodd “waitress sandwich” and the behavior of their own colleagues? Will these Senators put their time and actions in the Senate where they now say they really stand? Will they finally give  Juanita Broaddrick   her  due?


Output: no