In this task, you are given a part of an article. Your task is to generate headline (title) for this text. Preferred headlines are under fifteen words.

Example Input: The holy Quran is the holy book of the Muslims. It contains information about many domains. Often people search for particular concepts of holy Quran based on the relations among concepts. An ontological modeling of holy Quran can be useful in such a scenario. In this paper, we have modeled nature related concepts of holy Quran using OWL (Web Ontology Language) / RDF (Resource Description Framework). Our methodology involves identifying nature related concepts mentioned in holy Quran and identifying relations among those concepts. These concepts and relations are represented as classes/instances and properties of an OWL ontology. Later, in the result section it is shown that, using the Ontological model, SPARQL queries can retrieve verses and concepts of interest. Thus, this modeling helps semantic search and query on the holy Quran. In this work, we have used English translation of the holy Quran by Sahih International, Protege OWL Editor and for querying we have used SPARQL. Keywords— Quranic Ontology; Semantic Quran; Quranic Knowledge Representation.
Example Output: Applying Ontological Modeling on Quranic “Nature” Domain

Example Input: 1 Ranks, processes and flat grammar ....................................................................................... 2 2 The Rank-Interpretation Architecture for Multilinear Grammars ......................................... 6 2.1 Outline of the Rank-Interpretation Architecture framework .............................................. 6 2.2 A preliminary note on linearity and hierarchy at the phrasal rank ..................................... 7 2.3 Characterisation of the Rank-Interpretation Architecture .................................................. 9 2.3.1 Background ..................................................................................................................... 9 2.3.2 Formal summary ........................................................................................................... 10 2.3.3 Contrast with traditional views of language architecture .............................................. 11 2.3.4 Search for sui generis properties of ranks ..................................................................... 11 2.4 Procedural perspectives on the rank hierarchy ................................................................. 12 3 The discourse rank .............................................................................................................. 15 3.1 The primacy of discourse patterning ................................................................................ 15 3.2 Intonation of an adjacency pair ........................................................................................ 16 3.3 Chanted ‘call’ intonation .................................................................................................. 18 4 The utterance or text rank ................................................................................................... 20 5 The phrase rank ................................................................................................................... 22 5.1 Characteristics of phrasal structure .................................................................................. 22 5.2 Linear sequences, iteration: regular and subregular grammars ........................................ 23 5.3 A note on long-distance and cross-serial dependencies ................................................... 26 5.4 Prosodic-phonetic interpretation at the phrasal rank ........................................................ 27 6 The word rank ..................................................................................................................... 30 6.1 Flat words ......................................................................................................................... 30 6.2 Flat derivations ................................................................................................................. 30 6.3 Flat compounds ................................................................................................................ 31 6.4 Prosodic-phonetic interpretation at the word rank ........................................................... 31 7 Summary and conclusion .................................................................................................... 33 7.1 From Duality to Multilinear Grammar and Rank Interpretation Architecture ................. 33 7.2 Generalisation to stochastic flat linear models ................................................................. 34 7.3 Future work ...................................................................................................................... 35 8 References ........................................................................................................................... 36
Example Output: Multilinear Grammar: Ranks and Interpretations

Example Input: Fixed-vocabulary language models fail to account for one of the most characteristic statistical facts of natural language: the frequent creation and reuse of new word types. Although character-level language models offer a partial solution in that they can create word types not attested in the training corpus, they do not capture the “bursty” distribution of such words. In this paper, we augment a hierarchical LSTM language model that generates sequences of word tokens character by character with a caching mechanism that learns to reuse previously generated words. To validate our model we construct a new open-vocabulary language modeling corpus (the Multilingual Wikipedia Corpus; MWC) from comparable Wikipedia articles in 7 typologically diverse languages and demonstrate the effectiveness of our model across this range of languages.
Example Output:
Learning to Create and Reuse Words in Open-Vocabulary Neural Language Modeling