In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

Input: Consider Input: Comment: gj53 I'm with you on this one.  There are some pretty ignorant people here posting comments.   I guess that's why Chrysler/Jeep are still in business because if you like lipstick on pig (Jeep) you can get anyone to buy anything.  Proud owner of an 07 FJ 6spd with over 300,000km.  Doesn't burn a drop of oil, original diffs, transfer case, tie rod ends, wheel bearings etc......everything works.   Please go ask any Jeep owner (if they've even made it to that mileage) what they have had replaced in that time.  But please ignore the reliability record of this truck and buy a Jeep.  You'll love the garbage power train, weak towing capacity, zero interior room.  But you can work on your tan with your top down, listing to your passengers wine about how their backs hurt all the while sticking your leg out the doorless sides.....that is until your ecu fails, or starter, or alternator..........

Output: Non-identity-attack


Input: Consider Input: Comment: Can we assume you are wholeheartedly for lesbian relationships since "sodomy" is non-existent in their lovemaking?

Also, are you even aware many gay men are not interested in "sodomy"?

Drawing conclusions are what is or is not morally acceptable sexual behaviour based on "plumbing" materials is nuts.

Output: Identity-attack


Input: Consider Input: Comment: White nationalists = terrorists.
Antifa = terrorists.


Output: Identity-attack