We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

[Q]: Sent1: An argument regarding the death penalty should be confined to discussions regarding those who have been wrongly convicted and sentenced to death.
 Sent2: As it is today, when someone murderers another, the death penalty is considered, as it should be.
[A]: Not similar


[Q]: Sent1: Both the death penalty and a life sentence would have prevent further murders.
 Sent2: Does the death penalty deter evil more than life in prison?
[A]: Similar


[Q]: Sent1: Obviously, if someone were found innocent before execution, they would not be executed.
 Sent2: There have been numerous people who were presumed innocent after execution because the evidence showed that they were not guilty.
[A]:
Not similar