instruction:
Given a document and an entity the task is to select the author's sentiment towards the entity. Sentiments can be Positive, Neutral and Negative. Select Positive if the article expresses a positive view towards the given entity or praises its quality or skills. Select Neutral if the document expresses no clear view towards the entity or has equal amounts of positive and negative statements or expressing some fact/quote by someone else. Select Negative if the article expresses a negative view towards like harsh remarks, criticizing entities action/decision etc. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].
question:
What is the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Donald J. Trump ? Despite their hard-line  open borders demands  Senate Democrats  Flake  and Graham knew the terms of an immigration deal with the White House  as the  Trump  administration has said for months that no deal would be made unless legal immigration levels were reduced to raise the wages of American workers and full funding for the border wall along the U.S.-Mexico border was handed over.
Senate Democrats  Flake  and Graham have been unwilling to stray from their âGang of Sixâ amnesty plan and thus have attempted to blame  Trump  and senior adviser Stephen Miller for the shutdown  despite the terms of an immigration agreement remaining unchanged for months.
The Democrats are turning down services and security for citizens in favor of services and security for non-citizens. Not good! â Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) January 22  2018
Democrats have shut down our government in the interests of their far left base. They donât want to do it but are powerless! â Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) January 22  2018
answer:
Positive


question:
What is the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Kim ? The impetus for the talks came in  Kim âs annual New Yearâs speech on January 1  when  he  proposed direct discussions with Seoul âover the issue of improving inter-Korean relations by our nation itself â with the goal to âdefuse the current military tension.â  Kim  also welcomed the upcoming Winter Olympics as a âgood occasion for demonstrating our nationâs prestige â and said  he  wanted to send a delegation.
But while the bilateral talks were widely praised in South Koreaâs media  the US media seemed like a deer caught in the headlights from the first announcement of the breakthrough. Unclear how to respond to a possible outbreak of peace  the press immediately zeroed in on the section of Kimâs New Yearâs speech where he declared that his ânuclear forces are capable of thwarting and counteringâ anything from the United States.  Kim  also reminded Washington that the ânuclear buttonâ is on  his  office desk âall the time.â
Although the Supreme Leader left out some of the harsh anti-US language heâs used in previous declarations  the implied threat became the story for nearly every US media outlet covering his New Yearâs speech. At CNN  for example  reporter Brian Todd went on the air to warn Wolf Blitzer that the prospect of talks was dangerous because it could mask a North Korean military attack during the Olympics. In some broadcasts  Kimâs offer to talk  and Moonâs quick endorsement  were barely mentioned.
 Kim âs reference to  his  nuclear arsenal also drew a typical response from President Trump.  He  took to Twitter to declare that  he   too  had a âbutton â but it was âmuch bigger & more powerfulâ than Kimâs.  His  childish taunt quickly led to speculation about  his  state of mind and fitness to be president  a topic that dominated the White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sandersâs first media briefing of the year.
Asked at a press briefing at Camp David about the potential for negotiations with Kim  he replied: âSure  I always believe in talking.â¦ absolutely I would do that.â Trump âappeared to be strongly indicating that he would join talks with North Korea after the high-level inter-Korean talks  if the conditions are right â South Koreaâs liberal Hankyoreh concluded.
In the lead-up to the talks in Seoul  the mood was close to jubilant. âHopes are high that inter-Korean relations will improve â Hankyoreh reported on January 4. âSince  Kim  delivered  his  New Yearâs address on Jan. 1  North Koreaâs actions have been completely aligned with the Southâs response.â
The pace was set early on by The New York Times  in a front-page story on January 1 posted literally hours after  Kimâs New Yearâs speech .  It  instantly became the leitmotif for media coverage throughout the week.
Behind Kimâs New Yearâs declaration âlies a canny new strategy to initiate direct talks with South Korea in the hope of driving a wedge into its seven-decade alliance with the United States â reported Choe Sang-Hun and David Sanger  the latter a recipient of dozens of US intelligence leaks about North Korea over the years.
In the Choe-Sanger article  the Times cited Robert Litwakâa senior vice president at the Woodrow Wilson Center for International Scholars who is well-known in Japan and Korea for his hard-right views on security issuesâto back its claim that Kim is seeking to âtake the side of the South Koreans  against President Trump.â He was then given a large block of space on the Timesâs January 3 op-ed page to spell out his grave concerns for the wayward South Koreans.
âWashington and Seoul should not take Mr. Kimâs bait â Litwak argued. âInstead  the North Korean offer should be put to the diplomatic test through a united Washington-Seoul front.â
Yet despite the clear signals of disapproval from US hard-liners   the Moon and Kim governments pressed on   saying  they  would soon embark on âworking-levelâ talks to discuss the details of the Northâs participation in the Olympics  the family visits  and âsolve bilateral issues among  themselves  without relying on outsideâ forces  according to the Joongang Daily.
answer:
Positive


question:
What is the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Andy Ternay ? On February 11   Andy Ternay  wore a shirt that read âFUCK TRUMP AND FUCK YOU FOR VOTING FOR HIMâ on the front and âFUCK THE RACIST ALT-RIGHTâ on the back while out dining with his partner. In a Facebook post   Ternay  detailed his experience wearing the shirt at the First Watch cafÃ© in Richardson  Texas  which concluded with the restaurant manager asking him to leaveâand an police officer arriving to the scene.
âWe ask to tip our server for occupying her table  get drinks to go and leave. One table of white people applauds â he continued. While in the parking lot  a black server approached him and explained he quit on the spot after seeing the restaurant ask  Ternay  to leave.
 Ternay  told The Daily Beast that the only direct comments  he  received were positive and from people of color. â[A] Latino lady at the register thanked me [and] two African American servers said my shirt was awesome.â
 He  said  he  wore the shirt because  he  wants  his  friends  neighbors  and family members to know where  he  stands.
âI donât want people of color  Muslims  LGBTQ [people]  immigrants to feel alone â  he  said. âThe proper use of white male privilege is to help lift others. To speak truth to power.â
 He  says  he âs worn the shirt before and the only negative responses people gave were eyerolls. After the First Watch incident   Ternay  claimed in  his  post  a police officer met him in the parking lot.
 Ternay  made clear  he  did not want to condemn the restaurant nor did  he  plan to boycottââThese things are never easy for businesses  and the workers were polite and professional â  he  wroteâbut says  he âs gotten vitriolic messages sent to  him  on social media since  his  post went viralâ42K shares and counting. The responses are ironic  considering the expletive-filled shirts and sentiment expressed by the pro-Trump camp. But itâs the black folks and other people of color that have reached out to  him  that worries  him  most.
âI have gotten heartbreaking messages from African Americans saying they have lost faith in their white neighborsâthey are no longer confident their neighbors have their back â  he  told The Daily Beast. âMy shirt was a reassurance they are not alone.â
answer:

Neutral