In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

Example Input: Sentence: Since it was raining, I carried the newspaper over my backpack to keep it dry.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the backpack because it was not water resistant. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Example Output: Wrong

Example Input: Sentence: Jane knocked on Susan's door, but there was no answer. She was out.
 Reason: The 'She' refers to susan because she's the only one of the three who is still alive, and the other two are either dead. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Example Output: Wrong

Example Input: Sentence: When Tommy dropped his ice cream, Timmy giggled, so father gave him a stern look.
 Reason: The 'him' refers to timmy because the 'him' is also referred to as Tommy. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Example Output:
Wrong