We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

Ex Input:
If you thought sharks with lasers was bad XXX, wait until you see bees with lasers and poisonous metal stingers and little speakers that can play the Flight of the Bumble Bee as performed by Black Sabbath.

Ex Output:
Invalid


Ex Input:
They explain why assault weapons are favored by terrorists, mass killers, and violent criminals, and they distinguish such weapons from true hunting and target guns.

Ex Output:
Valid


Ex Input:
Under your theory, in cases where a person would be excused from militia duty because of old age or physical disability, would you say that person does not have the right to keep and bear arms ?

Ex Output:

Valid