Given a document and an entity the task is to select the author's sentiment towards the entity. Sentiments can be Positive, Neutral and Negative. Select Positive if the article expresses a positive view towards the given entity or praises its quality or skills. Select Neutral if the document expresses no clear view towards the entity or has equal amounts of positive and negative statements or expressing some fact/quote by someone else. Select Negative if the article expresses a negative view towards like harsh remarks, criticizing entities action/decision etc. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

Ex Input:
What is the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Bernie Sanders ? Ashton seems to have learned the right lessons from that debacle , has taken inspiration from the insurgent , unapologetically progressive campaigns of Bernie Sanders and Jeremy Corbyn , and hopes to both bring the NDP back to its left-wing roots and ride the same populist wave that propelled those two perennial afterthought backbenchers into the international spotlight .

Ex Output:
Positive


Ex Input:
What is the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Dana Baiocco ? Dana Baiocco  President Donald Trumpâs pick to sit on the Consumer Product Safety Commission  made her name helping companies avoid responsibility for harmful products. A partner at law firm Jones Day   Baiocco  has represented big tobacco and fought in court against asbestos workers who developed mesothelioma.
But the cases  she âs litigated that may conflict most directly with the CPSCâs mission of protecting the public from dangerous products involve all-terrain vehicles. While the CPSC was leading a campaign over ATV safety   Baiocco  was representing Yamaha in several suits over  its  two-person Rhino ATV.
 Baiocco âs appointment would put Republican appointments in the majority of the five-person commission  which could halt or reverse progress on a number of issues  including restrictions on off-highway vehicles  a category that includes ATVs. âIndustry very much wants the agency to abandon that rule-making â said Rachel Weintraub  legislative director and general counsel for the Consumer Federation of America. âAnd once there is a Republican majority  that may happen.â
In a letter  Baiocco  sent to the CPSC special counsel last month  she said she would recuse herself from âany particular matter in which I know that I have a financial interest directlyâ and issues that are of direct interest to her husbandâs firm  White and Williams. The letter didnât specifically address ATVs or Ikea dressers.
Remington A. Gregg  counsel for civil justice and consumer rights at Public Citizen  said  Baiocco  should âabsolutely recuse herselfâ from those and âany products sheâs worked on.â
Itâs unclear how many of those products she might encounter as a CPSC commissioner. In addition to Yamaha   Baiocco  who has worked at Jones Day since 1998   has defended R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company in a class-action suit filed on behalf of smokers in Florida. According to a financial disclosure form she submitted to the Senate   Baiocco  received at least $5 000 âin a yearâ from 13 clients  including R.J. Reynolds  Volkswagen AG  and the chemical manufacturer Daikin Industries  in addition to  her  more than $1.2 million salary from Jones Day.  She  also represented Honeywell Safety Products in a suit filed by the survivors of a worker who developed mesothelioma after being exposed to asbestos at the World Trade Center site.  Her  client list also includes airplane parts manufacturer Parker Hannifin  which  she âs represented in wrongful death cases involving 13 people  including the late Missouri Gov. Mel Carnahan.
 Baiocco  and the White House did not respond to requests for comment.
Consumer advocates will be closely watching Baioccoâs confirmation hearing in the Senate Commerce Committee  which is scheduled for Wednesday. âWe want to hear that  she âs actually concerned about health and safety and that  she  would work to protect our families â said Gregg. â Her  career shows the opposite.â

Ex Output:
Neutral


Ex Input:
What is the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Chair Ajit Pai ? After a slight scare when Federal Communications Commission (FCC)  Chair Ajit Pai  received a note to evacuate in the middle of  his  closing argument in favor of overturning net neutrality rules implemented by the Obama administration in 2015  the commission voted to end those rules Thursday.
 Pai  spent the majority of  his  closing argument reiterating  his  position on why the Orwellian-named net neutrality rules â which essentially implemented federal oversight of the internet under Title II regulations created in the 1930s to manage the Ma Bell telephone monopoly â had been an Obama administration mistake.
Prior to 2015 when net neutrality was implemented  the internet was regulated under what  Pai  is fond of calling a âlight-touch frameworkâ; simply put  the federal government had less regulatory oversight which allowed internet service providers and tech companies the ability to invest and innovate. Thatâs why the internet is as robust and efficient as it is.
 Pai  said the net neutrality rules were âexpress ordersâ from the Obama White House to the FCC  and led to less innovation and investment in the internet framework for the last two years  citing several specific examples. The environment that allowed the internet to thrive before the Obama-era rules âwasnât heavy-handedâ¦regulation â  Pai  said  which led to the $1.5 trillion investment in internet services and networks that gave America unfettered access.
 He  also noted  in contradiction to dissenting Democrat commissioners Jessica Rosenworcel and Mignon Clyburn (who delivered a nearly 20 minute âeulogyâ to net neutrality)  that people who complain about the internet donât complain about Internet Service Providers (ISPs) potentially blocking or throttling content  or that they might discriminate against Internet traffic of their competitors. Instead they complain that thereâs not enough choice regarding ISPs and that they might have no access at.
 Pai  noted that a lighter touch regulatory environment  where ISPs are free to start up and innovate  would address both of those problem.
In short   Pai  said the decision to overturn net neutrality âis not going to destroy the internetâ¦is not going to kill democracy  [and] is not going to stifle free expression online.â

Ex Output:

Positive