We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Q: Sent1: You might say the criminal deserved it, but murder is murder, whether they deserved it or not.
 Sent2: You are probably going to murder somebody; hopefully it will b in a place with the death penalty and then you will get what you deserve.

A: Not similar
****
Q: Sent1: I believe that if person takes the life of another, he should lose his life.
 Sent2: In fact, I think if Jesus did not believe in the death penalty, it would make his sacrifice that much greater, because he would be being unjustly put to death.

A: Not similar
****
Q: Sent1: If it has nothing to do with the death penalty, how could it have anything to do with lives saved by the death penalty in the first place?
 Sent2: If the same murderer had been given the death penalty, and never released in the first place, he would not be able to kill again.

A:
Not similar
****