Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
--------
Question: I was shocked to see this change in the official results! I can't believe that there was ever 88 Clinton supporters outside when the counting was taking place. I'm looking at the photos I took throughout the process and I don't see that many people. They told us the count was 352 to 69. This seems really shady...

Answer: Yes


Question: Your response is clearly uninformed.  Please read up on this case before adding your knee jerk, "she asked for it" comments.

Oh, I was not aware that it is a woman's fantasy to be assaulted behind a dumpster, while unconscious.  
Oh, and if the male was thinking that what he was doing was consensual, then why run when others find you assaulting a clearly unconscious person?  Two total strangers can see in a split second something was terribly wrong with that scenario, but he thought it was "ok".

Answer: Yes


Question: Can you elaborate on the differences?  Southern Baptists don't smoke/drink.  On the other hand, I am not sure that  
there are big differences in the way Imago Dei and Thomas Road approach sexuality and women's roles.  It is important to delineate where Imago Dei sits in the fundie Baptist world.

Answer:
Yes