In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine the neutral choice based on your inference from the statement and your commonsense knowledge. The neutral choice is a sentence that neither agrees nor disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3', corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence. If sentence X agrees with sentence Y, one's correctness follows from the other one. If sentence X disagrees with sentence Y, they can not be correct at the same time.

[Q]: Statement: Nothing to shoot at, he announced gloomily. Choices: 1. He was shooting with a gun.  2. So many targets for me to shoot at, he exclaimed joyfully! 3. He spoke with a gloomy tone about the lack of targets.
[A]: 1


[Q]: Statement: Four are essential to case study  iteration, OTTR, triangulation, and ruling out rival explanations. Choices: 1. Four are needed for making sure the rival explanations are in fact correct. 2. Four are needed for making sure the rival explanations are ruled out. 3. Four are needed to prove that the rival explanations can't happen because of gravity.
[A]: 3


[Q]: Statement: The commission seems to be giving some credence to the claimed benefits of the merger, while hedging its bets on the competition issue by shoring up Office Max and seeding healthy retail conflict in scores of communities. Choices: 1. The Office Max merger is necessary in order to avoid bankruptcy.  2. The merger has many listed benefits which have been reviewed by the commission.  3. The people were against the merge, because Office Max wouldn't bring in anything
[A]:
1