In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Comment: My original post to which you responded, was in the context of revolution. Did you miss that?
It seems to me that you're filling in some blanks with fantasy. I have no intention of starting a civil war, a revolution, of invading anyone's home, or killing someone because his or her political points of view differ from mine. In the light of recent events, it seems that it's more likely progressives who kill their ideological adversaries.
However, should there be a civil war between progressives and conservatives, I'd be supporting the conservatives in all ways of which I'm capable. I sincerely hope it never comes to that.
To be really clear, I do consider progressivism to be a social/political cancer that if allowed to grow will eventually kill the host.
Non-sexual-explicit

Comment: If the Democrats had any brains they would never "block" a Supreme Court nominee just based on ideology.  If they are not qualified that is one thing but if they are not a left winger that is nonsense.  Maybe the Republicans should then block any leftie from the court who is otherwise qualified.  This kind of stuff is what ruins our entire system and makes people not trust it at all.  We want good judges who are not buried in ideology but can rule on the facts and the law.  How hard is that?  Often, it is much easier than checking a potential ruling against a certain ideology.  Try it!
Non-sexual-explicit

Comment: It is funny how the libtard left has no agenda and can only resort to obstruction and cry about an imaginary Russian Trump Collusion. The libtard left is truly a house of cards and is entertaining to watch them fall.

Non-sexual-explicit