We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Ex Input:
Sent1: The penalty is seen as vengence, why do they let families of the victims watch?
 Sent2: The death penalty should never be seen as 'an eye for an eye' or as a relief for a victim or those close to them.

Ex Output:
Similar


Ex Input:
Sent1: An argument regarding the death penalty should be confined to discussions regarding those who have been wrongly convicted and sentenced to death.
 Sent2: As it is today, when someone murderers another, the death penalty is considered, as it should be.

Ex Output:
Not similar


Ex Input:
Sent1: By killing a person who murdered someone, you are just doing the same thing you are punishing him/her for.
 Sent2: You make it sound as though if someone is innocent, of anything, they should be killed.

Ex Output:

Not similar