We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Input: Consider Input: Sent1: So should we be able to impose the sentence of life without parole, all the while understanding that we may have put an innocent man in prison for life?
 Sent2: As long as we sentence people to a life in prison we are also GUARANTEED to sentence an innocent person.

Output: Similar


Input: Consider Input: Sent1: When a person commits a crime, the Judicial system is responsible for determining a proportional response or penalty for the crime.
 Sent2: In all honesty im glad i am not someone who has to decide murder as punishment for someone who has committed crimes.

Output: Not similar


Input: Consider Input: Sent1: I have been a victim of rape and if I were a victim of murder I would not desire the death penalty for the perpetrator.
 Sent2: One of the many grievances I have is that child rapists don't qualify for the death penalty unless the child that gets raped is also killed.


Output: Not similar