We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Ex Input:
>_> Says the person who brought up freaking Nelson in a debate about the death penalty for murders.

Ex Output:
Valid


Ex Input:
You see, the people who cite what they would actually DO with guns cite all the wrong reasons, like protecting themselves from the state and similar.

Ex Output:
Invalid


Ex Input:
Therefore, there is no benefit for them in agreeing to our constitutionally protected rights.

Ex Output:

Invalid