We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Q: Sent1: Most other first-world countries don't have the death penalty, but have lower rates of crime, just pointing that out.
 Sent2: In the United States, states without the death penalty has consistently lower murder rates.

A: Similar
****
Q: Sent1: One way that would make me happy with the death penalty is if the person was killed in the same way as the person that they murdered.
 Sent2: I do not think that a government should be unable to kill someone, simply that they almost always should not.

A: Not similar
****
Q: Sent1: But I oppose the death penalty because it has the capacity to kill innocent people.
 Sent2: I would support the death penalty IF there was a way to ensure that it would not put innocent people to death.

A:
Similar
****