In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence can be inferred from the statement. Incorrect choices change the meaning in important ways or have details that are not mentioned in the statement. Indicate your answer as 1,2, or 3 corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.

[EX Q]: Statement: This document-- Legal Services Corporation State Planning Configuration Standards -- presents in one place a comprehensive compilation of the standards LSC recipients and Designated State Planning Bodies (DSPB's)1 should consider and that the Legal Services Corporation will use in considering the configuration of a state's legal services delivery system. Choices:  1. This document has no compilation of standards. 2. This document presents in one place a comprehensive compilation of the standards LSC recipients should consider. 3. This document contains mostly a compilation of the standards LSC recipients should consider.
[EX A]: 2

[EX Q]: Statement: Adopting these criteria facilitates our evaluation of how well the electronic signature system addresses its threats and helps identify vulnerabilities that may be present in the system. Choices:  1. There are no methods to identify vulnerabilities in systems. 2. There are too many methods to identify vulnerabilities in systems. 3. There are methods to identify vulnerabilities in systems.
[EX A]: 3

[EX Q]: Statement: Clinton made this purpose clear in his speech Thursday at Birmingham Southern College, where he said the reason for the tests was to to find those kids and help them before they're in trouble and it's too late. Choices:  1. Clinton has not concerned about children at risk for falling behind. 2. Clinton wanted to find students at risk and help them before it was too late. 3. Many Democrats supported Clinton's education ideas.
[EX A]:
2