instruction:
The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the uv-part strategy, otherwise output No. uv-part is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to undermine the requirements of the opponent. For instance, suggesting that the opponent would not need more firewood since they already have the basic supplies or a suggestion that there might be a store near the campsite where the opponent can get the supplies instead.
question:
Context: 'We will likely also need to take water too. Need to be able to wash up.' 'That is fair, I also will need a good bit of firewood to keep warm as the campsite is in a colder area.' 'We dont care much for campfires. Leaves your cloths smelling for days!'
Utterance: 'Alright so I think we can make a fair deal here where we both will be happy 🙂'
answer:
No


question:
Context: 'Oh no, that's not good.  I still have some left over, but we're running out of firewood to use to heat it.' 'Seems like we are in the same boat, the bear tore our tent to shreds so we are sleeping outside and it is cold☹️' 'Sounds like a rough camping trip.  It has been pretty cold lately.'
Utterance: 'Is it possible I could have 3 food since I have none and 2 Firewood to stay warm and you can have 1 Firewood and 3 Water?'
answer:
No


question:
Context: ' I appreciate your willingness to discuss this, so we both get a fair deal. I would really like if I get 3 food, 1 water, and 1 firewood. Then you would get 2 water and 2 firewood. You said that you really need water and food, so I think that would work best for both of us to get what we need most. What do you think? 🙂' 'Np, problem, water is high in demand on my end with the amount of kiddos I am taking. Water is my main concern, will you be okay with 3 Foods, 2 Firewoods and no water?' 'I would really like 3 food, 1 water, and 1 firewood if possible. Would you agree to that instead?'
Utterance: 'If you were me would you be happy with 0 Foods, 2 waters, and 2 Firewoods? when water is your priority? maybe we can make it even, your highest priority is Food and mine is water? you can have all firewood? I will be shorten out on everything except the water and youll get 3 foods and 3 firewoods, while i only get 3 waters?'
answer:

Yes