Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.

[Q]: Our Legislature is now beyond dysfunctional when the Majority Leader (Charisse Millet)  has no idea what is going on inside her own majority caucus.  Besides that "Deputy Press Secretary to the House Majority" (a most critical state position I assume in these times of limited revenues) who else is the "we" in the "we've" who filed this suit?
[A]: No


[Q]: Your statement "As our already byzantine tax code has gotten more complicated thanks to Obamacare..." makes me chuckle how every woe we have is blamed on Obamacare. Please tell me when you did your taxes this year, just what part was more complicated because of the Affordable Care Act?
[A]: No


[Q]: This isn't Nashville hot chicken . It's actually a disgrace to Nashville to call this Nashville hot chicken . All it is is regular crappy kfc chicken with nasty oil lathered on top . It comes nowhere close to the spicy , soulfood flavor of actual Nashville hot chicken . It should be a law for a hole reviewing this crap to actually have to eat Nashville hot chicken before their review .
[A]:
Yes