TASK DEFINITION: Categorize the comment on the basis of obscenity. If the comment is obscene output Yes, otherwise output No.
PROBLEM: 'A Trial is  a formal examination of evidence before a judge, and typically before a jury, in order to decide guilt in a case of criminal or civil proceedings'. So strike three. Look it up yourself in any dictionary. You don't need to know about law , you just need to be literate Phil. You and your camp are obsessed and your obsession has colored the intention and motivation of this case. It was pretty clear to a jury evidently. At the point it's about winning and your vendetta , not about rape or  poor 'defenseless' women.  How selfish and disingenuous. You are a self-appointed watchman. Instead of slathering peoples pictures all over facebook, link people to the se offenders list or encourage other to get educated. They will find people like Brown themselves without your bias included in the information.

SOLUTION: No

PROBLEM: Maybe we shouldn't have spent the money on these fancy laser detectors and just used some flashlights in toilet paper rolls instead, and then waited for this collision of supermassive black holes a million years from now:
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/01/08/science/in-a-far-off-galaxy-2-black-holes-dance-toward-an-explosive-union.html?_r=2

The black holes involved in the current study were actually pretty small (61 suns combined) compared to the supermassive black holes at the centers of galaxies that may have masses up to billions of suns.

SOLUTION: No

PROBLEM: Look, I have read this legislation and understand what it is and what it isn't. 

You need to ask yourself: What about protecting the community? Don't we as a society value victims? Since when did we start to care more about the perps in our society than the innocent people they hurt? 

They ought to rename this legislation #FelonsLivesMatter. 

I think you people are insane. Do we need corrections reforms. Yes. Do we need treatment programs for our heroin epidemic? Yes. Do we need to somehow figure out how to break the cycle of violence and drag people out of poverty? Yes, abosolutely.

But do should we reduce sentences across the board? Even for sex offenders and violent psychopaths? Should we just let everyone bail out, no questions asked, even drug addicts that surely will head right back out for more home invasion burglary (you know 'victimless crimes'). 

Hell no we shouldn't!

SOLUTION:
Yes