Given a document and an entity the task is to select the author's sentiment towards the entity. Sentiments can be Positive, Neutral and Negative. Select Positive if the article expresses a positive view towards the given entity or praises its quality or skills. Select Neutral if the document expresses no clear view towards the entity or has equal amounts of positive and negative statements or expressing some fact/quote by someone else. Select Negative if the article expresses a negative view towards like harsh remarks, criticizing entities action/decision etc. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].
--------
Question: What is the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Antti Raanta ? "1-0 loss is always tough to take."  -- Antti Raanta on the #Yotes loss to the #BlueJackets pic.twitter.com/89eT7MQslg FOX Sports Arizona (@FOXSPORTSAZ) December 10   2017
 Antti Raanta  started in goal for the Coyotes after missing seven games with an injury and was sharp in stopping 33 shots.
" We  played hard " Arizona coach Rick Tocchet said. " We  had some chances.  We  had a couple 2-on-1s  a couple breakaways  hit a crossbar  so  we  had  our  chances to win the game."
Anderson got his team-leading 11th goal when he picked up a hard Panarin ricochet pass off the back wall  skated around the net and snapped a shot over  Raanta 's glove.

Answer: Positive


Question: What is the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Kim Jong Un ? North Korean leader Kim Jong Un speaks during the Second Plenum of the 7th Central Committee of the Workers' Party of Korea (WPK) at the Kumsusan Palace of the Sun  in this undated photo released by North Korea's Korean Central News Agency (KCNA) in Pyongyang October 8  2017. KCNA/via REUTERS.
SEOUL (Reuters) -  North Korea’s leader Kim Jong Un  said  his  nuclear weapons were a “powerful deterrent” that guaranteed its sovereignty  state media reported on Sunday  hours after U.S. President Donald Trump said “only one thing will work” in dealing with the isolated country.
In a speech to a meeting of the powerful Central Committee of the ruling Workers’ Party on Saturday  a day before Trump’s most recent comments  state media said  Kim  had addressed the “complicated international situation”.
North Korea’s nuclear weapons are a “powerful deterrent firmly safeguarding the peace and security in the Korean peninsula and Northeast Asia ”  Kim  said  referring to the “protracted nuclear threats of the U.S. imperialists.”
The situation proved that North Korea’s policy of “byungjin”  meaning the parallel development of nuclear weapons and the economy was “absolutely right”   Kim Jong Un  said in the speech.
“The national economy has grown on their strength this year  despite the escalating sanctions ” said  Kim   referring to U.N. Security Council resolutions put in place to curb Pyongyang’s nuclear and missile program.
North Korean leader Kim Jong Un speaks during the Second Plenum of the 7th Central Committee of the Workers' Party of Korea (WPK) at the Kumsusan Palace of the Sun  in this undated photo released by North Korea's Korean Central News Agency (KCNA) in Pyongyang October 8  2017. KCNA/via REUTERS.
 Kim Jong Un’s  sister  Kim Yo Jong  was made an alternate member of the politburo - the top decision-making body over which Kim Jong Un presides.
Alongside Kim Jong Un himself  the promotion makes Kim Yo Jong the only other millennial member of the influential body.
 Her  new position indicates the 28-year-old has become a replacement for  Kim Jong Un’s  aunt  Kim Kyong Hui  who had been a key decision maker when former leader Kim Jong Il was alive.
“It shows that  her  portfolio and writ is far more substantive than previously believed and it is a further consolidation of the Kim family’s power ” said Michael Madden  a North Korea expert at Johns Hopkins University’s 38 North website.
“The large-scale personnel reshuffle reflects that  Kim Jong Un  is taking the current situation seriously  and that  he ’s looking for a breakthrough by promoting a new generation of politicians ” the ministry said in a statement.

Answer: Positive


Question: What is the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Bart Fisher ? The top recipient has been Fisher Ranch LLC  the family company of Bart Fisher  a board member and the valleyâs second-largest landowner after Metropolitan. The records show his company has received $27.6 million in annual payments since 2005 for land left fallow.
 Fisher  and other board members say theyâve had no conflicts of interest in these decisions  and their attorney has backed them up. They say the fact that theyâve benefited from the program is the nature of their agencyâs structure as a landowner-voting district. All of the board members are landowners  and theyâre elected by landowners under a voting system in which the largest property owners can cast the largest numbers of votes.
 Fisher  was a leading proponent of the agreement in the early 2000s.  He  said  he  supported it because  he  strongly believed it was in the best long-term interests of landowners and the community.
âThe financial interests of the board were the same as the financial interests of our electorate â  Fisher  said.  He  recalled that Palo Verdeâs attorney advised the board ahead of the vote that they were fine to proceed with the decision.
âThereâs no conflict at PVID at all  because of how we are constituted â  Fisher  said. âOur electorate is whom we serve  and our electorate are landowners.â
Standing beside hay bales on his farm  Palo Verde Irrigation District board member Bart Fisher talks about the agency's lawsuit against the Metropolitan Water District. (Photo: Jay Calderon/The Desert Sun)
When they negotiated the terms of the deal   Fisher  said  the overarching purpose was helping California meet its water needs âwithout diminishing agriculture or our community in the process.â
âI have a vested interest and so do all the landowners in Palo Verde  especially those who participate in the program â  Fisher  said.
Participating farmers received an initial signup bonus of $3 170 per acre. In  Fisher âs case  the records show  his family entities received $6.3 million in initial signup payments.
Having those regular payments can function as a âsafety netâ for farming businesses during hard times and can provide a guarantee to help in getting credit from banks   Fisher  said. That doesnât mean it always pays more than farming  though. Looking back at some years   Fisher  said  farmers would have earned more selling crops than having unplanted fields.
 Fisher  is a third-generation farmer whose family started farming in the Palo Verde Valley in 1917.  He  said the fact that Fisher Ranch has received more from Metropolitan than any other business simply reflects the fact that  his  family has been farming for a century and has gradually expanded its landholdings.
 Fisher  farms more than 11 000 acres  growing hay  wheat  broccoli  cantaloupes and honeydew melons.
 He  said while  his  business receives large sums based on that acreage  it takes a lot of money to run the operation.  Fisher  pointed out that  he  and other growers make huge investments in tractors â which can cost roughly $300 000 each â as well as other equipment. They take out big loans and have large payrolls.
âJust to be in agriculture requires access to vast amounts of capital â  Fisher  said. âNobodyâs getting rich on this program.â
Palo Verde Irrigation District officials â from left  Board Member Jack Seiler   General Manager Ned Hyduke and President Bart Fisher â  talk about why  they  decided to sue Metropolitan Water District. (Photo: Jay Calderon/The Desert Sun)
While considering whether to sue   Fisher  said Palo Verdeâs board members discussed the fact that under the agreement  Metropolitan has the ability to cancel the entire program.

Answer:
Positive