Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.

Example Input: Daniel, thanks for your reply.  I don't believe that the people that disagree with my opinion are "idiots" or have "mental issues".  I do however think that insulting people that disagree only ensures that they will not change their opinion.  I believe that most people that want laws designed to protect people from themselves have only good intentions.  In my opinion most of these types of laws look great on paper, just not in practice.

I live with chronic pain, I choose not to take pain medications because it would effect my work.  I am happy with my choice because its the right choice for me.  If the consequences of a persons choices don't have direct impact on my life, it should be none of my business what they do.  This doesn't mean I shouldn't share my concern for the person, just that I shouldn't be empowered to coerce their decision making.

I also think that a doctor/pharmacy shouldn't ever be forced to write/fill a prescription they don't feel comfortable with.
Example Output: No

Example Input: And as usual convoluted rules of engagement from this white house passed along through  the military they scorn, targeting low level direct US military combatants, no interest in winning by Obama, and this hospital having admitted and treated the terrorists fighters, what can you expect? And yes they did it to the soldiers in Vietnam as well.
Example Output: Yes

Example Input: I'd bring a lawsuit against the employer for encouraging a hostile workplace environment, especially if the employee made attempts to get help before the attack by the supervisor.  Why doesn't Curry support a lawsuit?   Who the heck cares, at this point, whether or not the employee gives any notice of termination.  Every public and private workplace has an at-will discharge policy.  Employers can't have it both ways.
Example Output:
Yes