In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Q: Comment: Trid sees nothing wrong with "No Dogs or Jews", "We don't serve Muslims" and so on. He supports bigotry. And no, that is NOT a straw man, but the clear and obvious implication of your " If either the buyer or the seller does not want to enter into that contract for whatever reason then I believe they have the right to refuse." Thank you for proving that your claim to being a Christian is a complete sham.

A: Non-sexual-explicit
****
Q: Comment: Yeah, I often see the truck with all the dead baby pigs in it, and I'm pretty sure that the Department of Health and USDA would not approve.  Does not meet their storage, transportation, and sale regs.  Plus, seeing them all piled up is horrific.  The driver rolls up the door and boom, instant tragic atrocity right in your face.  Haven't seen the chickens and ducks, but I imagine it's the same issues with them too.

A: Non-sexual-explicit
****
Q: Comment: I understand it very well. You're right, however you can also smear others by saying things about them that are not true. A smear is a false accusation intended to damage someone's reputation, documentation or not. Let's put you in front of camera that records your opinion on safe sex and then edits to its owners intent. Will the sex toys be included?

A:
Sexual-explicit
****