Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
--------
Question: How can it be that "lawmakers" are packing up their offices and canceling meetings willy nilly - when they have not completed their jobs?  How can it be that these "leaders" are held to such different standards than the rest of us hard working Alaskans?  Our butts would be fired if we did such a half ass job and then just walked away. 

Now they will dither about when and where to meet to settle issues that should have been dealt with straight away, all the while collecting a paycheck and per diem for  NOT getting their job done. 

Shame on them and shame on all of us for letting this Royal Majority who does their business behind closed doors  stay in office.

Answer: Yes


Question: The termination of a public employee is a "personnel" matter, not a "personal" matter.  Such incidents are not open to the public unless the person terminated wishes to have his/her personnel materials partially or fully disclosed.  So the "we can't talk about it" answer, while frustrating, is correct.  If the incident "played out" as this article describes, I, for one, see no justification for Mr. Roberts' termination.  Other reasons?  You will NOT hear them unless, like Principal Lange in Springfield, Mr. Roberts chooses to have the information made public.

I know nothing of those possible "other reasons."  I do know that, to my knowledge, Mr. Roberts has been a competent, trustworthy public employee.  He's "crossed swords" with the Board of Directors of , at least, oneother entity and been, essentially, terminated because of it.  That doesn't mean he was "wrong" then, and it doesn't mean he's "wrong" now.  The third-party investigation he suggested seems a good idea.......

Answer: No


Question: maybe time to think of impeaching him, hes too arrogant and wont listen to anyone

Answer:
No