In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Input: Consider Input: Comment: Which part of "I'm a priest, and you are not" do you have difficulty understanding, Pandora?

Once again, you leap to the defense of a priest who is being a jerk.

Output: Non-sexual-explicit


Input: Consider Input: Comment: This is a terrible tragedy and and an utter travesty!!! We must tell Western and other world governments to stop pandering and kowtowing to the Chinese government and official Chinese interests! This includes strong messaging for the Canadian government and Prime Minister Justin Trudeau. Due to economics and fear of conflict, we in the 'free world' sacrifice our ethics and become complicit by ignoring the truths and pushing under the carpet everything that makes us feel uncomfortable or that pricks at our conscience. The term “human rights” loses its power and meaning, becoming trivialized and overused, its impact weakening and its punch losing its weight. The goals and ideals associated with 'human rights' begin drifting, becoming more unattainable, distant, uncertain and remote. We become detached from these goals and ideals and from ourselves. An encouraging sign with letter to China from 10 governments, including Canada, but that is a drop in the bucket.

Output: Non-sexual-explicit


Input: Consider Input: Comment: If the state is going to have non-consensual sex with us, make it as painless as possible with a SIMPLE flat tax of XX % of income (even our mindless politicos can do that math), NO BREAKS, NO EXCEPTIONS EXCEPT VETERANS. 5% break for veterans, and NO tax for disabled VETERANS. NONE. 
Did YOU do your duty or do you not care?
So simple, but unlikely because politicians will not be able to worm their way out of paying.


Output: Sexual-explicit