Categorize the comment on the basis of obscenity. If the comment is obscene output Yes, otherwise output No.

Input: Consider Input: Here's the rebuttal: Krugman is a player for the democrats political establishment to believe otherwise is foolishness. When the RG as with many liberal newspapers don't want to appear as the lone ranger they run a Krugman kind of column. His column isn't about Trump, it's all about getting Hillary elected. Like most democrats you don't see it anymore then the next tool. The Clintons are among the top 1%, the insider political establishment   and they intend to stay there no matter what or who they use. Independents like myself see it plainly for it is, a few Master Gardeners the 1% [the Clintons] have a shed full of foolish tools willing to be used. It all boils down to Forrest Gump's story.... "stupid is as stupid does". The really question is: So what does Hillary's moral and mental character have to offer the nation I know the answer do you?

Output: Yes


Input: Consider Input: And these are the same clueless Gov employees that are calling for a Wolf buffer zone?....

Output: No


Input: Consider Input: That demon labeled as a trophy hunter deserves to be shot dead. And no ifs, ands, or buts-- wolves need to be protected NOW. If not, Alaska will NEVER have me as a visitor, EVER. 😡😡😡


Output: Yes