We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

[EX Q]: They explain why assault weapons are favored by terrorists, mass killers, and violent criminals, and they distinguish such weapons from true hunting and target guns.
[EX A]: Valid

[EX Q]: Why do people that want what they call reasonable limits on the right to bear arms demand laws that only law abiding citizens will obey?
[EX A]: Valid

[EX Q]: I also took that to the range, and had a whole lot of fun shooting that, so now I have rifles and pistols, several each, and for a variety of different needs and purposes.
[EX A]:
Valid