Categorize the comment on the basis of obscenity. If the comment is obscene output Yes, otherwise output No.
--------
Question: Well-trolled, indeed. As far as Civil Comments goes, this seems like the best crucible there could be. And as far as Star Wars vs. Star Trek goes---nothing could ever touch Han Solo. The end.

Answer: No


Question: God grief! Have some common sense man.

Bill Clinton made an incredibly stupid decision to get a blow job from a young woman who was coming on to him. Good lord, the POTUS could have gotten more with less risk through discreet channels.

And, he dissembled; unwisely using lawyerly language in a futile attempt to get out of his predicament.

Both of these decision are fair game for criticism, and I am not excusing them.

However, he was hardly a "sexual predator."

-- Paul

Answer: Yes


Question: re: Dirksen - You prefer his "careful" approach? You mean his climate denying? His unwillingness to take a more forthright approach to our region dealing with climate change? To move forward on alternative transportation options? And I suppose this means you want careful movement on urban growth and other Metro-related issues; golly, we can't move too fast, gotta be careful. Don't want to act as soon as possible on these issues.

Rosenthal is a scientist and someone who has worked with government enough to know how to move forward in a strong, productive manner. Metro could really use him. But you prefer someone who is "careful" while demanding other offices be filled by the kind of bold leadership you reject in this race?

Answer:
No