In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: insult and non-insult. Insult is any lanugage or act that is disrespectful or scornfully abusive.

Comment: you're a piece of shit
Insult

Comment: Zinke is an idiot.  There is no safe lead exposure level for children.  Even the tiniest amounts are toxic- and reduce IQ.  Our congressional delegation must have been exposure to lots of lead when they were kids.
Insult

Comment: Thanks for the comment, Mr. VanHeerdan. If you could respond to me, I would appreciate your effort.  

You mention "a loving Father 'God' fulfills their childish yearnings."
Which believers do you mean: only Christians?  
Were you aware followers of Islam specifically denounce my belief of God as Father and humans as His children?
Why do they also believe in a Creator?
How does Muslims' denial of God as Father affect Freud's Father-longing insecurity diagnosis for believers?

Lastly, to an extent, I will describe myself as one of your "needy people"... while including all of us.  Most Christians see humanity's labors as corrupt or "chasing after the wind". Yet, Lewis documents well, IMO, our species' meaning on this "Goldilocks zone" planet. Simply put, though, our best longings -- compassion, philanthropy, peacemaking, self-sacrifice like Yeshua (Jesus) -- lead me away from Freudian naturalism and Darwinism. Are these my "childish yearnings"? Would you suggest believers give them up?

Non-insult