We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Q: Sent1: If I ever "murder" someone without cause, I would deserve to die.
 Sent2: If a person commits murder, I don't believe they deserve to live.

A: Similar
****
Q: Sent1: Life incarceration will never let him kill again, and its cheaper.
 Sent2: A life sentence does not prevent a murderer from murdering again.

A: Similar
****
Q: Sent1: i think that life without opportunity of parole is the more humane and just punishment instead of the death penalty.
 Sent2: If convicts believe their innocence, appeals through life imprisonment is much more justifiable because it is easier to atone for a life imprisonment as opposed to death.

A:
Not similar
****