We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

[EX Q]: JUSTICE STEVENS believes that the unitary meaning of ���keep and bear Arms��� is established by the Second Amendment's calling it a ���right��� (singular) rather than ���rights��� (plural).
[EX A]: Valid

[EX Q]: Basically, The US Curcuit Court upheld that the Second Amendment didn't apply to weapons that couldn't be carried by an individual.
[EX A]: Valid

[EX Q]: I have no idea how you conclude that I have rigid thinking, violence of expression, paranoia and hysteria, and an inability to budge from preconceived notions.
[EX A]:
Valid