In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

[Q]: Comment: Being registered in multiple states is one thing. Actually voting in the same election more than once is a much bigger issue. 

You should really try a little harder. Comparing anyone to Hitler is a weak attempt to win an arguement. If you really think President Trump is comparable to one of the biggest killers in history you should do a little self reflection.
[A]: Non-obscene


[Q]: Comment: This government is out of control.  What constitutes a "discount" and how much administration will retailers need to put in place to control this?  We have a government with a PM and Finance Minister that were born to wealth.  They have entitled lives with cottages provided by the McCains and vacations paid for by the friends like the Aga Khan and they don't get how hard it is to get by these days.  Both guys have had everything handed to them and don't get what it is like to really get ahead in Canada.  They spent the last four months attacking small business and now they are looking to retail employees, who are likely earning a minimum wage, for more tax revenue.  These guys are bad.
[A]: Non-obscene


[Q]: Comment: Well that`s better yet. Thanks for that.  I knew one of them had passed Trump`s repeal. Now Sullivan will be able to listen to people before he acts... so much the better.  
Maybe he can actually CONTRIBUTE something positive to the writing of the bill to allay the fears of Alaskans who will lose coverage under the Trump "no-care" plan, instead of being a waffle on everything up to now. Looking forward to his dancy- dodgy words..
[A]:
Obscene