In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine the neutral choice based on your inference from the statement and your commonsense knowledge. The neutral choice is a sentence that neither agrees nor disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3', corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence. If sentence X agrees with sentence Y, one's correctness follows from the other one. If sentence X disagrees with sentence Y, they can not be correct at the same time.
--------
Question: Statement: Such data include narratives of events written by participant observers, accounts of what the participants understood about an event, reports of what was said at a meeting or an interview, observational records of how an event took place, and statements of impressions about what was going on, why it was happening, and how people felt about it, themselves, or each other. Choices: 1. The data was made up of objective facts so it would not be influenced by mass opinion subject to influence by ulterior motive and gossip of other people as that would be unfair to the target of study in the case.  2. Data may be narratives of events as experienced by observers including any details, spoken memory of what was said and their overall impression and personal feelings.  3. The data on the Child Protective Services Report gathered information from all family members involved to determine safety in the home by interviewing them about narratives of events as experienced by family members including any details, spoken memory of what was said and overall impression and personal feelings. 

Answer: 3


Question: Statement: The region's waters abound in Lakeland char, perch, pike, vendace, and trout. Choices: 1. Trout and pike are two fish that reside in the region's waters. 2. Locals say that there's no beating the trout when it's freshly caught. 3. Trout and pike reside in the region's waters but vendace does not.

Answer: 2


Question: Statement: The argument is that the Senate should reject the case not because it's unproven but because it's politically motivated. Choices: 1. It's unproven, because the proof has been disposed of. 2. The Senate should not reject the case, because there is no proof. 3. The argument is that the Senate should reject the case because it's politically motivated, not because it's unproven.

Answer:
1