In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.
--------
Question: Comment: Sounds like McComas had a few priors but the theft was the only prior that left a victim. He might have tried something stupid that angered the cop. Freedom of information absolutely should be available as soon as it is discovered, for anyone to study. I'm not saying the police are corrupt but they do protect each other. What I fear is the concept of "We have conducted a thorough internal investigation and find no wrong doing on the part of the officer"

Answer: Non-sexual-explicit


Question: Comment: Love is different from lust and sex/sodomy.

Answer: Sexual-explicit


Question: Comment: I  belong to the last generation of Catholics who still remember the liturgy as it was before the Second Vatican Council (and who still know their Latin). I respect that liturgy for what it was and what it meant to those who came before us -- especially those who lived under persecution -- but I have no desire to return to it. The world has moved on since 1962. So has the Church.

This debate is fundamentally about ecclesiology, not liturgy. Let's weed the biretta-boys out of the seminaries and close any seminaries that are still teaching the toxic doctrine that a priest is 'ontologically superior' to a layperson.

If you were to attend Solemn Mass at The Oratory in London (where one of my uncles was a priest for 25 years), you would think you were attending a pre-Vatican II Mass. In fact, it is a modern Roman Mass celebrated in Latin with traditional ceremonial including fiddle-back chasubles, lace albs and birettas. Few Catholics under 60 would know the difference.

Answer:
Non-sexual-explicit