Given a document, find the main entity about whom the author is writing. Write the full name if mentioned in the text. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].
--------
Question: But  Pat Robertson  doesn’t see it that way. In  his  mind  this nation’s unfolding tragedy is a direct fault of people who don’t respect Donald Trump and the American flag enough. Yes  really.
What are Pat Robertson’s possible motives here? While people still fought for their lives after the deadliest mass shooting in modern American history  why did a televangelist feel the need to issue a statement this useless? He wasn’t trying to provide comfort. He wasn’t helping to make sense of the tragedy  because his thoughts here are violently stupid.
Robertson wasn’t trying to be helpful. He was trying to insert himself into a story that had nothing to do with him. He couldn’t help it. He can never help it. Because  Pat Robertson is an evil man .  He ’s been so evil for so long that one has to wonder whose side  he ’s on.
Let’s do a quick topline comparison between Satan  the Prince of Darkness  and Pat Robertson  the Prince of Doddering.
 Robertson  has spent decades lying and obfuscating  throwing  himself  into the middle of discussions in which  he  wasn’t invited  to offer opinions that nobody wanted.  He ’s weighed in on the Iraq War  9/11  sex outside of marriage  Hinduism  the earthquake in Haiti  abortion  and every other topic du jour  tragic or zeitgeist  that can help boost Pat Robertson Awareness.  He ’s thrown  his  fortunes in with warlords  hucksters  and profiteers.
 He ’s claimed  he  can leg-press 2 000 pounds  thanks to the aid of a protein shake.
 Pat Robertson  has built a billion-dollar empire by saying  he ’s a person who knows what God wants other people to do. As host of The 700 Club   he ’s spent thousands of hours on the bleakest television channel preaching to  his  followers about how they can emulate  Jesus   how they can send him money in an extremely holy way. Meanwhile  he has lived a life of wealth and privilege  at the expense of dupes.
What  Robertson  has said about Las Vegas is so much worse than  his  usual praying for attention.  He ’s rebranding cruelty as sanctimony  nastiness as wisdom.  He ’s the answer to the question “What Wouldn’t Jesus Do?”
What’s the difference between  Pat Robertson  and Satan? Satan’s not real. Unfortunately   Pat Robertson  is.

Answer: Pat Robertson


Question: Cosplayers join Lupita Nyong'o's family for 'Black Panther' screening in actress' native Kenya
Chadwick Boseman stars as T'Challa/Black Panther in the first stand-alone film for the superhero created by Stan Lee and Jack Kirby in 1966. The cast also features Michael B. Jordan  Lupita Nyong'o  Daniel Kaluuya and Letitia Wright.
Lupita Nyong'o and Letitia Wright also star in the fim.
"Black Panther" vanquished those notions with $169 million in ticket sales. It was No. 1 in most international markets  though "Fifty Shades Freed" bested  it  in Germany.
 Its  release in China will come later. This weekend  the Chinese New Year holiday  local productions led by "Monster Hunt 2" and "Detective Chinatown 2" dominated Chinese theaters with more than $150 million in ticket sales each.

Answer: Lupita Nyong'o


Question: Daniel O'Neill â an economist at the University of Leeds in the United Kingdom â and several collaborators came up with 11 indicators that a country has met the needs of its citizens. They range from boosting life expectancy above age 65 to ensuring that at least 95 percent of its adult population has graduated from high school  has access to sanitation and earns more than the extreme poverty line of $1.90 a day.
From that  "we can calculate a carbon budget for the rest of the century " notes  O'Neill . And then dividing that by the number of people on the planet  "we can say  'OK  this is the carbon budget per person.' "
Unfortunately  "we really didn't find that " says  O'Neill .
"It's a worrying finding " says  O'Neill . But  he  cautions against concluding that there is simply no way for everyone to enjoy a decent life without destroying the planet. After all  these findings are based on how we are doing things now   he  says.
And  he  adds that this study actually points to one way to do that. Specifically   O'Neill  and  his  fellow researchers ran statistical tests to determine for each environmental measure how much damage it takes to produce a corresponding improvement on each of the social well-being indicators.
"And what we find is that it follows a curve of diminishing returns â as you use more resources you get less social bang for your buck " says  O'Neill . "So there's a turning point after which additional resource use contributes very little to social performance." Wealthy industrialized nations such as the United States  the United Kingdom and Canada have reached that point  says  O'Neill . "As we increase our resource use  we get almost no increase in human well-being from that."
And this means for these countries the strategy of growing the economy â basically trying to create new wealth â to boost the well-being of their underprivileged citizens is ineffective. A much better approach  argues  O'Neill   would be to focus on redistributing their existing wealth more equitably.
And if high-income countries were to adopt such an approach  says  O'Neill   they could reduce their use of resources. And that   he  says  would "free up the ecological space" for poor nations  where using resources still does make a big impact in improving people's lives.

Answer:
Daniel O'Neill