Categorize the comment on the basis of severe toxicity. If the comment is severely toxic output Yes, otherwise output No.

Ex Input:
bycatch: if people think Alaskans dont pay tax to live here by paying one of the highest property taxes rates, paying local sales taxes, looseing PFD income to severence taxes. That adding an income tax is an absolute necessity to be "fair and not have a free ride"  go ahead and tax the heck out of our incomes. But then I'll have to say reduce my property tax burden. Quit taxes that affect the PFD base fund income. There the math is equaled out for ya. I can reference tax data to:   http://www.keypolicydata.com/blog-archives/2015/01/severance-taxes-fuel-alaskas-highest-nation-tax-burden-2013/ 
Again I say tax is tax no matter how its removed from someones income it is still tax.

Ex Output:
No


Ex Input:
They will make a day out of it or a weekend. There will be barbecue going and plenty of cold beer. Make sure to wear sunscreen and your best shades,flip flops are not mandatory.
Planting trees is getting of easy compared to the clean up thats needed.

Ex Output:
No


Ex Input:
"It is already Federal law not to have a weapon within 600 feet of a school or a day care center" 
.

Nope. 

(Though you're right about the ridiculousness of the patchwork, it only applies if the person KNOWS there's a school too close to where s/he is.) 

.
First off, it's 1000' (apx. 3 blocks), including on the property & in the buildings, though there are exceptions... including having a CCL from the state in which the school sits. 

. 
Secondly, that federal "gun-free" school zone law only applies to grades 1-12, not day care centers, not kindergartens, not colleges. 
.

For the actual federal law giving the definitions, see 18USC921 (25) and (26) here: 

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/921 

.
For the federal "gun-free" school zone law itself, see 18USC922(q)(2):

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/922

Ex Output:

No