We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Example Input: The point is not to make things worse, or better.
Example Output: Invalid

Example Input: Eyewitnesses are frequently unreliable, DNA evidence has been overturned, and even personal confessions are unreliable: several people confessed to being the Yorkshire Ripper here in the UK who were found to have nothing to do with it.
Example Output: Valid

Example Input: That comment implies that you see the death penalty as a deterrent.
Example Output:
Valid