We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

Ex Input:
Many people who would never dream of shooting a person can own a gun simply for the artistry of a well made machine, people hunt with guns as well.

Ex Output:
Valid


Ex Input:
Can you point to the last time a private individual was successfully prosecuted either in legal or civil court for the recognized offense of having violated the constitutional rights of another private individual?

Ex Output:
Valid


Ex Input:
We could hypothesize that if guns are banned then law abiding citizens who usually didn't carry or own guns before the ban will be less likely to face armed opponents.

Ex Output:

Valid