We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

Ex Input:
Then why are you opposed to the innocent fighting for their own lives instead of hopeing the police will get there in time?

Ex Output:
Valid


Ex Input:
All that does is imply that crime rate depends on more than just the presence/absence of guns - it disproves 'more guns = more crime' about as much as it disproves 'more guns = less crime'.

Ex Output:
Valid


Ex Input:
"Gun control" is an illegal and unConstitutional fiction for hoplophobes to cling to instead of sucking their fingers or thumb.

Ex Output:

Valid