Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.

Example Input: Well, I think groups like Black Lives Matter are picking the wrong martyrs but many police surely get into that field because they like "shooting stuff" and driving too fast. Same deal with professional soldiers and other adrenaline junkies.
Example Output: Yes

Example Input: LFS2, you raise valid issues of how Koreans, colonized since 1910, dealt  with the reality  of their  brutal occupation  by Japan; some, as you describe, chose or were forced to be members of the Japanese military. 
 In a powerful book on WWII, "War Without Mercy" author John Dower discusses the Japanese use of Korean soldiers  to guard POWs and, as others, mentions their excessive cruelty. However, he adds CONTEXT: "Between 1939 and 1945, close to 670,000 Koreans were brought to Japan for fixed terms of work, mostly in mines and heavy industry, and it has been estimated that 60,000 or more of them died under  the harsh conditions of their work places.  Over 10,000 others were probably killed in the atomic bombing of  Hiroshima and Nagasaki." (p. 47)

Now, LFS2, a question- were you suggesting that  postwar South Korea's leaders were more likely to have been Korean "Quislings?" Sounds like the old "East Germany- West Germany" argument.
Example Output: Yes

Example Input: Actually the very statement about the Old vs. New proves the point that Christians do not have the "right" to force their religion on everyone.   By the way, homosexual relations were considered an act of war/aggression back in Old Testament days.  It is something that conquering soldiers did to humiliate/subdue their enemies, like prison sex.   That kind of nonconsensual rape is condemned by most rational people, but consensual sex between two adults is totally different.
Example Output:
No