In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: threat and non-threat. Threat is a statement that someone will be hurt or harmed, especially if the person does not do something in particular.

Input: Consider Input: Comment: O: "At the time of the Iraq invasion, Trump was not a politician and much more likely to let his true inside be known."

Well his 'true inside' at the time was support for the invasion. Tepid support, but support nonetheless.

O: "I believe him when he says he did not support the war since demonstration thereof requires action. . "

By definition, answering a question on a nationally-syndicated radio show constitutes taking an "action." 

The funny thing is that this is such a stupid issue. When asked, Trump could have said, "At the time, I was sort of for it but I wasn't really sure." Presto! No issue. Everyone would have understood because that was the mood of the country at the time. But for some reason he just isn't wired that way.

Output: Non-threat


Input: Consider Input: Comment: Well, you were the one who specifically mentioned BLM. I was following up with a question to that. Some people are incapable of recognizing what BLM is. It's not a group that says ONLY black lives matter, it's a group that says black lives matter too. Because, unfortunately, it doesn't seem to be that obvious to some of the rogue police out there. Or some of the clueless citizenry.

Output: Non-threat


Input: Consider Input: Comment: "BLM? Weren't they behind the crucifixion of Jesus? Yeah, they're the worst."

Huh? 

I'm sure you meant that to be clever, but I'm afraid it simply makes no sense.


Output: Non-threat