The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.

[Q]: Context: 'I am ready to give 1 amount of food for you. But I want some quantity of water and firewood for me.' 'I would take 3 packages of food and just 1 package of water. Is it okay for you?' 'No, I don't take this. Because food is important for my child and me.'
Utterance: 'Try to understand our situation. We had food a week back. We were drinking only water for the whole week. We are dying of hunger. Kindly understand our situation.'
[A]: Yes


[Q]: Context: 'You can never be too prepared. We stay closer to camp as we have little ones with us on this trip.' 'are you interested in taking 1 firewood, all 3 foods and 1 water ? And then what's left would be to us ? ' 'I would do 2 firewood, 3 foods and 0 water.'
Utterance: 'Well it's important for both of us to get that wood ! '
[A]: No


[Q]: Context: 'sure that sounds fair' 'Ok, do you have any interest in any fire wood?' 'I do need firewood, we cook over open flames. 😮How you get 2 water, 1 food and 1 firewood?'
Utterance: 'How about if I give you 3 food for 3 waters, and then we split the firewood?'
[A]:
No