We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

[Q]: To make it otherwise we would need some legislation requiring Mr. Patel to accept firearms at his motel which would survive a constitutional challenge claiming that it: 1.
[A]: Valid


[Q]: In my view I think that complete gun control helps solve a major problem in crime and it would allow people to feel safer because they wouldn't need to have a gun to protect themselves.
[A]: Valid


[Q]: Establishment of gun-free-zones is not in conflict with our right to bear arms.
[A]:
Valid