We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

[EX Q]: Sent1: If someone killed my relative, I wouldn't want them killed, I would want them to spend the rest of their lives in hard, back breaking labor.
 Sent2: If someone kills my child, my parent, my siblings, my love, i would want them to pay the price.
[EX A]: Similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: We need to halt the death penalty before anyone else gets unjustly sentenced, then fix the problems (if that is even possible), and then, when we have safeguards in place, reinstitute it.
 Sent2: What we need are harsher sentences including the death penalty.
[EX A]: Not similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: States without the death penalty have fared BETTER in reducing their murder rates than states with the death penalty.
 Sent2: If the execution rate decreased and the murder rate increased then that explains the deterrence effect of capital punishment.
[EX A]:
Similar