We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Sent1: I don't even give a shit about the death penalty, I was just making a point.
 Sent2: I think death penalties should be allowed for harsh offenses.
Not similar

Sent1: Did you study when these people were exonerated and in what year were they placed on the death penalty?
 Sent2: The studies are very clear that people are routinely convicted of crimes that they never committed, period.
Not similar

Sent1: The antepenultimate man to be sentenced to death was innocent.
 Sent2: while it is a fact that innocent people have been placed and convicted to death row condemned to die, there are however people who are guilty and should die.

Not similar