In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

Sentence: The large ball crashed right through the table because it was made of styrofoam.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the table because The one crashing is likely to be have made of styrofoam. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Correct

Sentence: Jane gave Joan candy because she wasn't hungry.
 Reason: The 'she' refers to jane because Jane gave away something she wouldn't have if she were hungry. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Correct

Sentence: I can't cut that tree down with that axe; it is too thick.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the tree because it is too small. I can't cut that tree down with that axe. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

Wrong