In this task, you're given a statement, and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence clearly disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3' corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.
--------
Question: Statement: An attorney representing a client before judge and jury was no longer the norm of a case when delivering critical legal services to low-income individuals. Choices:  1. Attorneys representing low-income individuals are the norm. 2. The norm of the case was violated when the attorney delivered their services. 3. Low-income individuals are often targeted by the justice system because of their inability to finance their legal battles.

Answer: 1


Question: Statement: they just you know just just level the whole place and let it go but we're going to have to be over there and we're and our presence is going to have to be felt and they've got to be strong presidents or presence uh if we don't then i think that we're going to be back there Choices:  1. They need to destroy the place to be strong presidents. 2. They have to be weak presidents and not do anything. 3. We need to use a bunch of bombs.

Answer: 2


Question: Statement: This moved even White to incredulity. Choices:  1. White got pushed to disbelief. 2. White was pushed farther than he had been before. 3. White was still happy.

Answer:
3