In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

[Q]: Comment: north korea  3 atomic bombs  9 million  people                                                      usa                7000                       350                      The usa has to find a small        country to bomb the shit out of to make itself feel good no mater that kim       dum dum is an idiot
[A]: Obscene


[Q]: Comment: and another ignorant one, trump is not the usual he is a leader who knows how to bargain from strength, not being sheep like obama and justin
[A]: Non-obscene


[Q]: Comment: Traini, 

What do "pets" have to do with this? The only people potentially losing the exemption are -commercial enterprises-.

Maybe if politicians spoke with detached precision about issues, avoiding emotional rhetoric rather than pandering with it, and insisted the media do the same, voter ignorance would decrease.
[A]:
Non-obscene