We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

Example Input: We know that Bloomberg is convinced that guns are the reason his city is such a mess.
Example Output: Valid

Example Input: I guess you either didnt see or chose to ignore the part about a gun on its own being no more dangerous than popsicle sticks, hence the words on its own.
Example Output: Valid

Example Input: But since the student in question parked on a public road, meaning it was city property, outside of designated school owned and leased property, the weapon wasn't on school property and the expulsion isn't legal.
Example Output:
Valid