In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

Ex Input:
Sentence: I used an old rag to clean the knife, and then I put it in the drawer.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the knife because I had to use the scissors to shave off the skin that was left behind after the knife was sharp. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

Ex Output:
Wrong


Ex Input:
Sentence: Steve follows Fred's example in everything. He influences him hugely.
 Reason: The 'He' refers to fred because Steve follows Fred's example, thus Steve is primary. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

Ex Output:
Correct


Ex Input:
Sentence: Bill passed the gameboy to John because his turn was next.
 Reason: The 'his' refers to john because the turn of bill is over so he gave it to john. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

Ex Output:

Correct