In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: insult and non-insult. Insult is any lanugage or act that is disrespectful or scornfully abusive.

Ex Input:
Comment: Nobody should listen to anything Elizabeth Warren says.   She is a L O S E R!!

Ex Output:
Insult


Ex Input:
Comment: There are lots of great thinkers and ideas that come out of the US, as well as probably more from self-serving ideologues that have found success in one way or another and subsequently consider themselves wise in all ways of the world. It would be nice to limit penetration of the latter while easing that of the former, but I think we all know which is in the ascendant these days all over the place.

Ex Output:
Non-insult


Ex Input:
Comment: MC, First, this site purports to use some mix of "NEA, job survey and private data" to come up with their numbers. In their own words, it's "tricky business". Second, the numbers aren't actual salaries, but are a "comfort index" which tries to give a weighted metric vis a vis cost of living(which can vary a lot within states). Hardly "hard data" to make a policy decision off of, but perhaps useful for rookie teachers looking for work, maybe.  Just having starting and average salaries doesn't tell you the whole story. Averages can be skewed by very  high/low earners, a more useful number is median salary. And again, it doesn't address the total compensation issue, or any other factors that are involved that make one state's situation different from anothers. Still waiting for that comprehensive study to be dug up. I think I'll be waiting a while.

Ex Output:

Non-insult