In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

[EX Q]: Comment: Stay on this site long enough, Lewis, and you'll get a clear picture that Craig is a racist.  S(he) trolls this site to post bigot or racists comments against the homeless, Natives, and the LGBT populations.
[EX A]: Non-obscene

[EX Q]: Comment: 100yrs from now... 

"ah yes, ol' standoff szajkowski, i remember him well.  boy, nobody could pull off a standoff like joe; he had a real talent for it.  so talented in fact that he began teaching standoff tactics 101 at the local community college.  tell that guy to do something and he'd stonewall your ass til' the cows came home.  ya know, a lot of people didn't know this about joe, but he was a phenomenal badminton player too.  yep, i didn't believe it either when i first heard.  but it's true.  they used to call 'em ol' shuttlecock szajkowski.  wonder whatever happened to that standoff-havin' shuttlecock whackin' crazy sonofabitch?"
[EX A]: Obscene

[EX Q]: Comment: Honor killings are certainly horrific. Yet other forms of violence against women are far more prevalent than honor killings. Domestic violence has been called the hidden epidemic.

If the president and the Republican legislators and some of the commenters who are so in favor of this new reporting requirement truly cared about the well-being of women, then they would push for more funding for the prevention of domestic violence and for assistance to victims and survivors.

This reporting requirement is ludicrous, because no one is trying to under-report the incidence of honor killings or to downplay its horror. The incidence of domestic violence against women by native-born Americans is regularly downplayed.
[EX A]:
Non-obscene