In this task, you will be presented with a context from an academic paper and a question based on the context. You have to classify the questions into "Extractive", "Abstractive", or "Yes-no" questions. Extractive questions can be answered by concatenating extracts taken from a context into a summary while answering abstractive questions involves paraphrasing the context using novel sentences. Yes-no question is a question whose expected answer is one of two choices, one that affirms the question and one that denies the question. Typically, the choices are either yes or no.

Q: In all our experiments, we used the out-of-the-box BERT models without any task-specific fine-tuning. 
 Question: How does their model differ from BERT?

A: Abstractive
****
Q: GP-GNNs first build a fully-connected graph $\mathcal {G} = (\mathcal {V}, \mathcal {E})$ , where $\mathcal {V}$ is the set of entities, and each edge $(v_i, v_j) \in \mathcal {E}, v_i, v_j \in \mathcal {V}$ corresponds to a sequence $s = x_0^{i,j}, x_1^{i,j}, \dots , x_{l-1}^{i,j}$ extracted from the text.  
 Question: So this paper turns unstructured text inputs to parameters that GNNs can read?

A: Yes-no
****
Q: In this paper we focus on the skipgram approach with random negative examples proposed in BIBREF0 .  
 Question: Do they use skipgram version of word2vec?

A:
Yes-no
****