In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Q: Comment: I've had a few ex military friends say they would join the men wearing flannel before they ever shot killed American citizens. Remember this term: "all threats, foreign and DOMESTIC" ever consider our own president as a threat? OH CRAP....I think the cigarette smoking man from The X-Files is sitting in a car outside my apartment I better shut up.

A: Obscene
****
Q: Comment: What? Jeff Sessions isn't good. He's pretty much evil.

A: Non-obscene
****
Q: Comment: @Not the Alliance

Arar wasn't making bombs or killing people.

Arar faced extremely harsh Syrian torture practices in Damascus whereas Khadr alleges he only faced sleep deprivation while in Gitmo. Again, a lot of speculation and assumptions are being made about how Khadr's confession was obtained but he certainly didn't face anything close to what Arar was subjected to. One could also reason he was coached into claiming they deprived him of his afternoon nap to claim it was torture.

Two completely different situations and hardly a precedent.

A:
Non-obscene
****