You are given first 5 messages from a series of message exchanges between 2 persons playing the game of Diplomacy which is an American strategic board game. You need to generate the next message. The message should be generated such that it fits the context seen so far. Avoid the text that is (i) tangent to the context, (ii) repeats the context.

[Q]: ["Hello Russia! I'm highly interested in working with you. As Austria I strongly believe in the necessity of acquiring a strong early alliance, and who better than a partner who can help me keep down Turkey :)", 'The first clear point between us is dependent on how we want to arrange the balkans, and of course, the typical sore point between us in Galicia. I would be interested in hearing your thoughts on both of those.', "I'd much rather neither of us worry the other about Galicia, it makes no sense to even feign a fight. The single most important thing that Italy, Russia, and Austria can do for their future success on a board, in my opinion, is not have a Turkey extant. If the three of us work together and coordinate it properly, Turkey will fall fast.", "Turkey hasn't said anything to me just yet", 'So what moves are you planning? Seems tough to go hard against turkey so early']
[A]: As long as you, me, and Italy all go in and coordinate, Turkey won't be able to stand up to us.


[Q]: ['Greetings Russia!\n\nHow is it over there in the north? I feel that an France-Russia alliance is basically the best in the game. Of course, this is a bit more of a mid and late-game alliance, but there is no reason not to work something out rn. What do you think? Looking forwards to a great game\n\n-France', 'Absolutely, I think with the artificial time constraints in this game a three or four way draw is the most likely outcome, and as we share no direct spheres of influence I of course bear you no ill will. Hope to see you in the end game', 'Alright, looking forwards to it. Have you heard anything of italy, france, or germany? Just trying to gather some intel here 🤪', "Hi again Russia. I don't know about you but I would be interested in an alliance—our positions perfectly complement each other right now. I know that you and turkey have an alliance—but if you look at the last few years, it's clear that you haven't gotten anything out of this. In the first year of the game, you had 7 units, and were looking like you basically had the game. But once you made your alliance with turkey, you were all bottled up, and got no more builds. But now, your actually in a great place to stab turkey, with you fleet in Bla, and your armies in the Balkans. I think if we play this right, the game could practically be ours.", 'Excellent move!']
[A]: To be honest I'm not willing to betray trust with Turkey. I would be happy, however to see a 3 way draw in 1910 consisting of you, Turkey and I.


[Q]: ['Greetings, Czar.  How are things in Russia?', 'Have you been able to gather anything from Austria or Turkey?', 'I’m willing to work with you in the East, let me know if I can be of assistance', 'Not yet - we have to actually process a couple moves before I can gather any dots from them.\nOh, you meant information.  Turkey\'s not super talkative, seems to be looking at traditional boring Turkish openings.  Austria strikes me as the kind of guy who probably messages every person on the board with an opening proffer of "Hey!  Do you want to ally against <mutual neighbor>?"', 'Yes, I’ve only gathered the same from both of them. I suppose their dynamics will be more clear after a few moves. Let’s keep each other updated']
[A]:
Have you and Turkey agreed to anything as far as how to split up Austria?