We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Input: Consider Input: Sent1: So how about we stop a penalty that has executed innocents?
 Sent2: By the same token, if we keep administering the death penalty while the system is broken, we will have a much greater risk of putting someone innocent to death.

Output: Similar


Input: Consider Input: Sent1: People have been found out to be innocent after the death penalty ha already been carried out....
 Sent2: There has been so much cases of people who have been executed, only to be found innocent after their death.

Output: Similar


Input: Consider Input: Sent1: Some innocent people are still sentenced to death, and that's where I see a problem.
 Sent2: The way I see it people who murder shouldn't be sentenced to death or spend life in the jails we have here there to nice.


Output: Not similar