In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

[EX Q]: Comment: This is a terrible tragedy and and an utter travesty!!! We must tell Western and other world governments to stop pandering and kowtowing to the Chinese government and official Chinese interests! This includes strong messaging for the Canadian government and Prime Minister Justin Trudeau. Due to economics and fear of conflict, we in the 'free world' sacrifice our ethics and become complicit by ignoring the truths and pushing under the carpet everything that makes us feel uncomfortable or that pricks at our conscience. The term “human rights” loses its power and meaning, becoming trivialized and overused, its impact weakening and its punch losing its weight. The goals and ideals associated with 'human rights' begin drifting, becoming more unattainable, distant, uncertain and remote. We become detached from these goals and ideals and from ourselves. An encouraging sign with letter to China from 10 governments, including Canada, but that is a drop in the bucket.
[EX A]: Non-sexual-explicit

[EX Q]: Comment: Muslims can kiss my white christian ass.
Deleting this is an infringement on my freedom of speech.
[EX A]: Sexual-explicit

[EX Q]: Comment: Photographers of all talent and ability levels routinely watermark their work these days.   Keeps plagiarizing at bay a bit while advertising their work.  Of course, this wouldn't register with those who steal names.
[EX A]:
Non-sexual-explicit