In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

[EX Q]: Comment: You do realize I'm sure that HRC campaign has successfully used fear to control the loyal subjects of the dem. party. It really is sad to see just how easy these voters are manipulated. She has disdain for her supporters but they refuse to allow that into their narrow vision.  DT has a unsavory past with his words. HRC has a corrupted past. However her ardent supports find more fault with mere words then they do with actions because the actions were committed by a dem. Pitiful that we have come to this point. You know, Nixon had to resign due to his cover-up, how many more cover-ups is HRC involved in? But again, since she has a "D" behind her name the ignorant dem. voters will either ignore, or more likely,  condone the criminal. The good news, her day is coming where she will be held accountable, the bad news, if she is elected first we get that insane Kaine. WLTDO, question for you, do you think the puppets even bother to read the leaks? I don't, they haven't been told to.
[EX A]: Non-sexual-explicit

[EX Q]: Comment: Wait for it. Who knows what we'll see. Will Trump want to hug him? Hit him? Cuddle Him? Have you seen Trump's handshake with the Jap PM this morning? Trump looks even sillier than usual and has the Jap leader rolling his eyes because of an overlong and aggressive handshake. I can't stand Justin Trudeau, but I wish him well against this monumental creep on Monday. One a light-minded and handsome Canadian and the other a self-obsessed and literally "loud and obnoxious" American. The world is already watching Trump very closely and I think that Justin will stand out during and after his visit to D.C. - literally because of his good-looks. 21st century man.
I want to see how their handshakes go on Monday - that could tell it all.
[EX A]: Non-sexual-explicit

[EX Q]: Comment: Yes, but if Sessions has gender reassignment surgery, can he still join the Alabama National Guard? Or is looking exactly like Alfred E. Neuman also a disqualifier?
[EX A]:
Non-sexual-explicit