The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the uv-part strategy, otherwise output No. uv-part is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to undermine the requirements of the opponent. For instance, suggesting that the opponent would not need more firewood since they already have the basic supplies or a suggestion that there might be a store near the campsite where the opponent can get the supplies instead.

[Q]: Context: 'I would want to keep at least one packet of food for myself, unless you want to just swap 3 firewoods for 3 packets of food, to keep it simple?' 'I like your plan.  It is simple. I will agree to that.' 'So all that is left is water, i guess i should atleast drink alot of it if i wont eat much haha 🙂'
Utterance: 'For sure, and you will need some way to put out the fire. 😮'
[A]: No


[Q]: Context: 'Great! I'll be going to the Catskills, in NY. Where are you planning on going?' 'Antarctica! I am going to need as much firewood as I can get.' 'Ha, woah that's exotic! I'll need some firewood as well, but maybe not as much as you! I'm planning on going hiking a lot, and will need some extra water, as, again, ill be hiking a lot'
Utterance: 'I will offer 3 water to you! You will maybe need more food with that much exercise? How about 2 food? I really need that extra firewood. Remember that the Catskills probably has some extra wood around.'
[A]: Yes


[Q]: Context: 'I am going to be camping for a couple of weeks, so I will need quite a bit. I also realized some additional water would be good, because I have some meals that need me to boil water. Maybe you can have 2 firewood in exchange for me having one of your waters? Then you would still have plenty of water, but also plenty of firewood 🙂' 'So sorry, I just realized you did not agree to the 3 waters in exchange of 3 foods. if you want a water, i will also will need one food. just to make things more fair on my end. If not i am looking at 2 waters, 0 foods, and 1 firewood. But i am willing to compromise for 3 waters, 1 firewood, and 0 foods. and you'll get 3 foods, 2 firewoods, and 0 waters, what do you think?' ' I appreciate your willingness to discuss this, so we both get a fair deal. I would really like if I get 3 food, 1 water, and 1 firewood. Then you would get 2 water and 2 firewood. You said that you really need water and food, so I think that would work best for both of us to get what we need most. What do you think? 🙂'
Utterance: 'Np, problem, water is high in demand on my end with the amount of kiddos I am taking. Water is my main concern, will you be okay with 3 Foods, 2 Firewoods and no water?'
[A]:
No