We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Example Input: Sent1: If capital punishment works (deterrent), why do we have such a high murder rate per capita?
 Sent2: IE - the death penalty acts as a deterrent to other would be murderers.
Example Output: Similar

Example Input: Sent1: So what you're saying is, even if the guy we're sending to the chair didn't actually commit a murder, he should still die because he was an asshole in his personal life.
 Sent2: No he the guy who killed twitter should have to suffer in jail and think about what he done for the rest of his life, and not be given the easy way out buy the death pentaly.
Example Output: Not similar

Example Input: Sent1: So as long as only some innocent people are killed for crimes they didn't commit then the system must be sound.
 Sent2: if someone commits any crime, then they are a criminal by definition and should die.
Example Output:
Not similar