instruction:
In this task, you will be shown a sentence, and you should determine whether it is overruling or non-overruling. In law, an overruling sentence is a statement that nullifies a previous case decision as a precedent by a constitutionally valid statute or a decision by the same or higher ranking court which establishes a different rule on the point of law involved. Classify your answers into overruling or non-overruling
question:
the rationale behind the principle that a ""defendant may not receive a harsher sentence solely, or even partially, because he refuses to plead guilty and proceeds to require the prosecution to prove his guilt"" ""is that the coercion or inducement casts a chill over the exercise of guaranteed fundamental constitutional rights.""
answer:
non-overruling


question:
the alternative holding in heaps v. toy, supra, finding the contract in that case contrary to good morals, is inconsistent with the numerous california decisions upholding contracts between nonmarital partners when such contracts are not founded upon an illicit consideration, and is therefore disapproved.
answer:
overruling


question:
as the united states supreme court has observed, the crawford rule is flatly inconsistent with the prior governing precedent, roberts, which crawford overruled.
answer:

overruling