The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the self-need strategy, otherwise output No. self-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to create a personal need for an item in the negotiation, such as by pointing out that the participant sweats a lot to show preference towards water packages.

Example Input: Context: 'i need the firewood because i tend to catch a cold easily and also scared of the dark. i can give you 2 water and 2 food for 3 firewood and i food' 'will you allow me to get 3 waters and you can have the 3 firewood and 2 foods? 🙂' 'yes i can agree to that, thats a good compromise'
Utterance: 'yay, thank you so much! to very I am getting 3 waters, 0 firewood, and 1 food?'
Example Output: No

Example Input: Context: 'Interesting - you're essentially saying that you need the majority of two of the three items. Hmm...' 'Yes, thats all. I need 1/3 food, 2/3 water, and 2/3 firewood.' 'Still not convinced in any way that you need more items in total over me. Please clarify!'
Utterance: 'Food is what I prioritize much more than the others. If you want the majority of the others, I will need all the food.'
Example Output: No

Example Input: Context: 'Hi!  I want some additional packages of firewood, water, and food' 'Are you bringing guest?'
Utterance: 'I am a campaign partner'
Example Output:
No