We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

Input: Consider Input: Even gun hating knife hating, sword hating, pizza cutter hating, citizen rights hating england still allow airsoft.

Output: Valid


Input: Consider Input: I know people who want to limit ownership of guns to musket-type weapons as were used when the 2nd amendment was written and people that are for an insane amount of registration and background checks, etc.

Output: Valid


Input: Consider Input: States are claiming a gross usurpation of non delegated powers of Congress that rightly belongs to the States and or to the People, but powers that definitely have not been delegated to Congress.


Output: Valid