The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.

[EX Q]: Context: 'Hello, how are you doing today?' 'Good. How you doing buddy? 🙂' 'I'm doing pretty good. I plan on camping with the family this weekend, how about you?'
Utterance: 'Nice. Same, it's over 100 degrees where I live. 🙂'
[EX A]: Yes

[EX Q]: Context: 'Will you please give me one firewood? I may run out of what i have. Just one.' 'I think I will need all the firewood since you are taking 2 foods. I will need to hunt and cook food from the land meaning I need my fire going all the time.' 'I need one more to light a fire to scare away animals. Please😮'
Utterance: 'Then How about I get two foods, 1 firewood and 1 water?'
[EX A]: No

[EX Q]: Context: 'Hmmm...I'm pretty muddy due to clumsiness, so I may need one extra. I could give you two waters and all of the firewood. What do you think? 🙂' 'So are you suggesting that I would get 2 waters, 3 firewood, and no food?' 'Right! Well, beyond the food you already have. '
Utterance: 'I have an extra person camping with us that I didn't expect when I bought food, so I could use one if you're willing 🙂'
[EX A]:
Yes