We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

[EX Q]: Sent1: Furthermore, any assertion that the death penalty is not a deterrent is false.
 Sent2: Therefore the argument of death as a deterent is a joke.
[EX A]: Similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: Although there is much controversy about him, I agree that prisons, especially for those for whom the death penalty could be considered, should be punishment.
 Sent2: The way I see it, capital punishment doesn't have to be expensive at all.
[EX A]: Not similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: The death penalty has been used as a scapegoat for many people who are against executions.
 Sent2: the use of the death penalty is an act of revenge which cannot be undone, so should the state be put on trial for putting to death an innocent person?
[EX A]:
Not similar