We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

No more pain, no more suffering, no more hardship, no more earthly demands, no more constantly uncertaintly, no more worrying, no more problems.
Invalid

Any parent who "beats the shit" out of their kid, is too far gone to wonder why the kid is violent.
Invalid

What the death penalty is, is more than relinquishing their right to freedom, it's relinquishing their right to life for taking another's.

Valid