We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

Q: Those who admit to being a firearms owner are unlikely to admit to binge drinking, and those who admit they engage in binge drinking are unlikely to admit to owning a firearm.

A: Valid
****
Q: No, the gun (+one set of ammo) still costs more than restocking pepper spray for a lifetime (calculation: pepper spray @~Σ7 per year, handgun @~Σ500 = ~71 years)

A: Valid
****
Q: Anybody who uses nonsensical lingo (ie cop killer bullets, rapid fire automatic weapons, saturday night specials, high-powered rifles, vest buster, gun show loophole etc.) to frighten people and distort the facts.

A:
Valid
****