We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

[Q]: Sent1: There would be executions for murderers and jail time for others.
 Sent2: Killing the criminal would just make others angry, since there are other ways to take criminals out of the streets, like life sentences.
[A]: Not similar


[Q]: Sent1: We seem to have more compassion for the victims and potential victims of murderers than we do for the murderers.
 Sent2: By not giving the death penalty to a slaughtering murderer, we are telling the world that the life of this murderer is worth more than that of his victim.
[A]: Not similar


[Q]: Sent1: I also don't think someone has been put to death for a third degree murder.
 Sent2: As it is today, when someone murderers another, the death penalty is considered, as it should be.
[A]:
Not similar