In this task, you're given a statement, and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence clearly disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3' corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.

Statement: so under the circumstances Choices:  1. Given the circumstances.  2. So under the table.  3. Given the circumstances surrounding the election. 
2

Statement: Critics' principal target is the company's policy of pegging doctors' investment returns to profits at Columbia/HCA-affiliated institutions. Choices:  1. Critics do not aim at the company's policy of pegging doctors' investment returns to profits. 2. Critics aim at the company's policy of pegging doctors' investment returns to profits. 3. Critics aim at the company's policy of pegging doctors' investment returns to profits, said the economists.
1

Statement: McCain, for example, demands an investigation of the allegations about technology transfer [and] all these campaign contributions that came out of China. Choices:  1. Political campaigns are entirely self-funded by the candidates.  2. McCain doesn't find China trustworthy. 3. McCain is knowledgeable about technology.

1