In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Ex Input:
Comment: If the author  had any appreciation of multiculturalism, he would understand that people of different languages and culture have difficulties with names with different spelling constructs and pronunciations. The author thinks multiculturalism is for him to receive as a birthright for not having been born white, and  that it is beneath his own dignity to extend multiculturalism tolerance to others of different races and cultural backgrounds.  He makes a poor example of what a Canadian ought to be.

Ex Output:
Non-obscene


Ex Input:
Comment: After WW2 Italians, Poles, Ukrainians, Finns, Dutch and other people came to Canada , no assistance, no welfare, and without Gov't programs found jobs, educated their children and helped build this country. They did not beg or cry or were a burden on the system. Stop the scam. Stop bringing people who can not or will not help themselves. Time for the bleeding hearts and goody two shoes to wake up. The experiment has failed. Shit or get off the pot!!!!!

Ex Output:
Obscene


Ex Input:
Comment: What a lucky country we are, where throwing eggs and smashing windows is our idea of "violence", and makes the news headlines.

In many countries, machine gun fire and mass murder are so routine, people just ignore it.

Ex Output:

Non-obscene