In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence can be inferred from the statement. Incorrect choices change the meaning in important ways or have details that are not mentioned in the statement. Indicate your answer as 1,2, or 3 corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.

[EX Q]: Statement: I am generally a fan of Michael Kinsley's, but I must take issue with his recent article, Social  From Ponzi Scheme to Shell Game. Choices:  1. Michael Kinsley's latest article raises some issues within me. 2. I loved everything about Michael Kinsley's newest article. 3. Despite causing some issues my opinion of MIchael Kinsley hasn't changed.
[EX A]: 1

[EX Q]: Statement: With his hands free, the rest was easy. Choices:  1. It was easy to break out of the cell, with his hands not free. 2. With his hands cut loose, the rest was a piece of cake. 3. With his hands still tied behind his back, everything else was impossible.
[EX A]: 2

[EX Q]: Statement: Something else altogether. Choices:  1. It was the same.   2. Something different.   3. The candy was something different.  
[EX A]:
2