We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

Ex Input:
DC's highest gun deaths per capita coincidences with the fact that guns are legal there, doesn't mean anywhere guns are legal crime rates will be high.

Ex Output:
Valid


Ex Input:
That right there is reason enough not to give government absolute control over firearms.

Ex Output:
Valid


Ex Input:
An analogy would be some phobias - people are afraid of apparently harmless objects because they associate a fear-causing situation with that object, just as seeing a gun causes someone to become more aggressive because they associate aggressiveness with the weapon.

Ex Output:

Valid