In this task, you're given a pair of sentences, sentence 1 and sentence 2. Your job is to determine if the two sentences clearly agree/disagree with each other, or if this can't be determined. Indicate your answer as yes or no respectively.

Q: Sentence 1: This corruption and authoritarianism have irked democracy advocates, but it has not been enough to fully discredit Tudjman. Sentence 2: Tudjman is no longer credible to anyone after corruption took place.

A: yes
****
Q: Sentence 1: Ca'daan awoke and hid behind a bush to move his bowels. Sentence 2: Ca'daan was embarrassed abotu what he was doing.

A: no
****
Q: Sentence 1: DiClemente reported that most of the people who got the longer intervention in his study remembered the interventionist at the two-week follow-up, so there was some recall. Sentence 2: Almost everyone forgot who conducted their intervention just minutes after leaving the room.

A:
yes
****