Given a document, an entity and its sentiment towards the entity, verify if it is the correct sentiment towards the entity. Answer should be yes or no. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

[EX Q]: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Tom Ashbrook is Negative . The allegations against "On Point" host Tom Ashbrook include that he engaged in "creepy" sex talks and gave unwanted hugs  neck and back rubs to 11 mostly young women and men who worked on the show. They were contained in a document and confirmed in multiple interviews by WBUR-FM  the Boston station that produces the show.
 Ashbrook  was put on leave last week.
In a text to the station   Ashbrook  said: "I am sure that once the facts come out that people will see me for who I am â flawed but caring and decent in all my dealings with others."
"On Point" is carried by more than 290 NPR stations.  Ashbrook  has hosted for 16 years.
[EX A]: yes

[EX Q]: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Christopher Foerster is Positive . If you wondered just how insane the NFL season would get  fans were treated to a video over the weekend that reportedly featured  former Dolphins offensive line coach Christopher Foerster  snorting what seemed to be cocaine while  he  whispered sweet somethings to a Las Vegas model who would later post that very video to  her  social media feed.
The reason  she  did such a thing was  in part  the ongoing national anthem controversy that continues to polarize a country.
 Foerster  took full responsibility for the video and has since resigned from  his  post with the Dolphins.
 He  states  via The Sun-Sentinel: âI am resigning from my position with the Miami Dolphins and accept full responsibility for my actions. I want to apologize to the organization and my sole focus is on getting the help that I need with the support of my family and medical professions.â
[EX A]: no

[EX Q]: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Shamoon is Neutral . That virus â called Shamoon after a word embedded in its code â was designed to do two things: replace the data on hard drives with an image of a burning American flag and report the addresses of infected computers â a bragging list of sorts â back to a computer inside the companyâs network.
 Shamoonâs code  included a so-called kill switch  a timer set to attack at 11:08 a.m.  the exact time that Aramcoâs computers were wiped of memory. Shamoonâs creators even gave the erasing mechanism a name: Wiper.
Computer security researchers noted that the same name  Wiper  had been given to an erasing component of Flame   a computer virus that attacked Iranian oil companies and came to light in May. Iranian oil ministry officials have claimed that  the Wiper software code  forced them to cut Internet connections to their oil ministry  oil rigs and the Kharg Island oil terminal  a conduit for 80 percent of Iranâs oil exports.
 It  raised suspicions that the Aramco hacking was retaliation. The United States fired one of the first shots in the computer war and has long maintained the upper hand. The New York Times reported in June that the United States  together with Israel   was responsible for Stuxnet   the computer virus used to destroy centrifuges in an Iranian nuclear facility in 2010.
If American officials are correct that  Shamoon  was designed by Iran  then clues in its code may have been intended to misdirect blame.  Shamoon âs programmers inserted the word âArabian Gulfâ into  its  code. But Iranians refer to that body of water as the Persian Gulf and are very protective of the name. (This year  Iran threatened to sue Google for removing the name Persian Gulf from its online maps.)
[EX A]:
yes