In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence can be inferred from the statement. Incorrect choices change the meaning in important ways or have details that are not mentioned in the statement. Indicate your answer as 1,2, or 3 corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.

Ex Input:
Statement: Starr, as noted, asked for the leak investigation to be put under seal, then publicly regretted his inability to discuss a matter under seal. Choices:  1. Starr did not regret having the leak investigation put under seal. 2. Starr asked the leak investigation to be put under seal, even though it hurt him later. 3. Starr was asked if he was sure about having the leak investigation under seal.

Ex Output:
2


Ex Input:
Statement: piece crudely indicts the entire Serb nation (they didn't need to load Kosovars into boxcars to look bad). Choices:  1. The Serb nation was not indicted at all in the piece. 2. The entire Serb nation is cruelly indicted in the piece. 3. The Serb nation has never been indicted in other pieces before.

Ex Output:
2


Ex Input:
Statement: To my mind, though, Jewish toughness of the sort that was in evidence in Entebbe, Uganda, 22 years ago, when armed Jews flew thousands of miles to rescue Jewish innocents from death, was one of the great moments in post-Holocaust Jewish history--a statement to the world that Jews will no longer sit idly by and watch themselves being oppressed. Choices:  1. What happened in Entebbe, Uganda had no significance in post-Holocaust Jewish history. 2. Armed Jews rescued thousands of innocent people in Entebbe, Uganda. 3. Jewish toughness 22 years ago signaled to the world that Jews will rise up against injustice.

Ex Output:

3