We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

Example Input: ���We���ve never taken issue with law abiding citizens who have a weapon legally,��� said Peter Hamm, communications director of the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence.
Example Output: Valid

Example Input: They didn't shoot someone because they were criminals, they because criminals because they shot someone, Your point boils down to 'Laws do not work because people disobey them-we should have no laws'.
Example Output: Valid

Example Input: However, the people of Washington, D.C. should me made aware that their right to keep and bear arms does not come from the Federal government, the Constitution or their local government.
Example Output:
Valid