In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence can be inferred from the statement. Incorrect choices change the meaning in important ways or have details that are not mentioned in the statement. Indicate your answer as 1,2, or 3 corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.

Example Input: Statement: Would I fool with them if they were big? They can't hurt you. Choices:  1. They look dangerous even though they aren't. 2. They are unable to harm you. 3. The can hurt you badly.
Example Output: 2

Example Input: Statement: Until the early 1990s much of the coastline was undeveloped, but a rash of building projects creates an almost continuous ribbon all along the shoreline. Choices:  1. There wasn't much development before 1990. 2. The buildings include residential condos and restaurants. 3. The coastline remains largely untouched by human hands, with a few small-scale beach resorts operating close to the cities.
Example Output: 1

Example Input: Statement: If the basic political tensions in America today are between pro-big-government and anti-big-government factions, and the pro-big-government faction just won, how are the Journal 's editorial sympathizers supposed to find comfort in that analysis? Choices:  1.  If the political tensions are between people that are for large and small government, how should the Journals allies find contentment?  2.  If the political tensions are between people that are for large and small government, why do people still read the Journal? 3.  If the political tensions are between people that are for medium and no government, how should the Journals allies find comfort? 
Example Output:
1