Given a passage with a context and an answer, construct a question on the basis of the information present in the passage. Construct the question in such a way that (i) it is unambiguous, (ii) it is answerable from the passage, (iii) its answer is unique (iv) it answer uses text phrases from the passage. Avoid creating questions that (i) can't be answered correctly without actually understanding the passage and (ii) uses the same words or phrases given in the passage.

Example Input: Context: Lung transplantation is a viable option for patients with cystic fibrosis. The current strategy of selection, based on spirometry and deterioration of quality of life, results in a high mortality on the waiting list. We reviewed the case histories of patients with cystic fibrosis accepted for lung transplantation to ascertain whether pulmonary hemodynamics could contribute to predict life expectancy.', 'Forty-five patients with cystic fibrosis were accepted: 11 died on the waiting list (group I), 24 underwent transplantation (group II), and 10 are still waiting (group III). During evaluation we recorded spirometry, oxygen requirement, ratio of arterial oxygen tension to inspired oxygen fraction (PaO (2)/FIO (2)), arterial carbon dioxide tension (PaCO (2)), 6-minute walk test results, right ventricular ejection fraction, echocardiography, and pulmonary hemodynamics. We compared data from group I, II, and III patients. A comparison was also made within group II between the data collected at the time of evaluation and at the time of transplantation to quantify the deterioration during the waiting time.', 'The waiting time, spirometry, 6-minute walk test results, and right ventricular ejection fraction did not differ among the three groups. A statistically significant difference was found for PaO (2)/FIO (2), PaCO (2), mean pulmonary artery pressure, cardiac index, pulmonary arterial wedge pressure, and intrapulmonary shunt between groups I and II. Groups I and III showed statistically significant differences for mean pulmonary artery pressure, PaO (2)/FIO (2), and systemic vascular resistance indexed. No differences were observed between groups II and III. The comparison within group II showed a significant deterioration of pulmonary hemodynamics during the waiting time.
Answer: Pulmonary hemodynamics are worst in patients dying on the waiting list and deteriorate significantly during the waiting time. They may thus contribute to establish priority for lung transplantation in patients with cystic fibrosis.
Example Output: Do pulmonary hemodynamics contribute to indicate priority for lung transplantation in patients with cystic fibrosis?

Example Input: Context: Macroprolactinemia is a frequent finding in hyperprolactinemic individuals, usually without clinical impact. Data on biological activity of macroprolactin (bbPRL) are controversial and mostly based on a heterologous rat Nb2 cell bioassay. Biological activity of bbPRL observed in vitro but not in vivo may be due to its high molecular weight, preventing its passage through capillary barrier. Alternatively, bbPRL bioactivity may differ depending on the prolactin (PRL) receptor (PRLR) species specificity.', 'The objective of the study was to characterize the bioactivity of bbPRL in a homologous bioassay: Ba/F-3 cells stably expressing the human PRLR.', "Chromatography-purified bbPRL from macroprolactinemic individuals (group I, n = 18) and monomeric PRL from hyperprolactinemic patients without macroprolactinemia (group II, n = 5) were tested in Nb2 and Ba/F-LLP bioassays. Both groups were followed up at the neuroendocrinology outpatients' clinic.", 'Biological activity of bbPRL presented in the two bioassays was measured.', 'In group I, no patient had hypogonadism. Mean ratio bioactivity to immunoactivity of bbPRL in the Nb2 assay was 0.69. There was no dose-response in 15 of the 18 samples tested in Ba/F-LLP assay. In group II, three patients had galactorrhea and all five had hypogonadism. Mean ratio bioactivity to immunoactivity of monomeric PRL samples was 1.35 in Nb2 and 0.91 in Ba/F-LLP assay.
Answer: Whereas both bioassays achieve similar results with respect to monomeric PRL activity, our results indicate that the activity displayed by bbPRL toward the rat receptor may be inappropriate because it is not observed in the human PRLR-mediated assay, consistent with the apparent absence of bioactivity in vivo.
Example Output: Does human macroprolactin display low biological activity via its homologous receptor in a new sensitive bioassay?

Example Input: Context: The effect of type 2 diabetes mellitus (adult-onset non-insulin-dependent), which is the most common form of diabetes in humans, on osseointegration capacity has not been addressed in an appropriate animal model. This study histologically and histomorphometrically examines bone healing around titanium implants in the type 2 diabetes rat model.', 'Titanium implants with a chamber were placed into the femurs of normal male rats and genetically modified male rats with a close symptomatic resemblance to human type 2 diabetes, as characterized by late-onset hyperglycemia and obesity. Cross-sectional histology for the tissue grown into the implant chamber was examined.', 'Bone volume around implants was consistently (from weeks 4 to 8 postimplantation) smaller for the diabetes group than for the control group in the cortical area, while the bone volume in the marrow area was not affected by the diabetes. Bone-implant contact percentage was considerably lower for the diabetes group in both the cortical and marrow areas, with the week 4 bone-implant contact in the cortical area being 12% for the diabetes group and 61% for the control group. A 2-fold difference remained at week 8. Bone morphogenesis in the diabetic rats was characterized by fragmented bone tissues and extensive soft tissue intervention.
Answer: Type 2 diabetes mellitus impaired osseointegration capacity disproportionally between the cortical bone and bone marrow areas. The reduction of the bone quantity in the cortical area and the bone-implant contact in both the cortical and marrow areas was remarkable.
Example Output:
Does type 2 diabetes impair implant osseointegration capacity in rats?