We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

[EX Q]: Sent1: When a person commits a crime, the Judicial system is responsible for determining a proportional response or penalty for the crime.
 Sent2: In all honesty im glad i am not someone who has to decide murder as punishment for someone who has committed crimes.
[EX A]: Not similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: You can't get much worse than a death penalty.
 Sent2: I guess the question begs to be asked to my friends on the left is If life in prisonment is so much worse then the death penalty why do you think most prisoners on death row would choose that option?
[EX A]: Similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: An argument regarding the death penalty should be confined to discussions regarding those who have been wrongly convicted and sentenced to death.
 Sent2: As it is today, when someone murderers another, the death penalty is considered, as it should be.
[EX A]:
Not similar