In this task, you're given a statement, and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence clearly disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3' corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.

Statement: This bill, however, is distinguishable because it limits specific representation and does not restrict lawyers in the manner of that representation. Choices:  1. The bill would severely limit specific representation.  2. The bill would not impact lawyers for representation. 3. The bill doesn't change anything for lawyers.
3

Statement: Left to decide what part of the 1996 Act to strike as invalid, the court concluded that congressional intent regarding severability was unclear. Choices:  1. It was decided that the intent of severability was quite clear. 2. As a result, the court left the 1996 Act as it was originally written. 3. The court was able to decide which parts, if any, of the 1996 Act were invalid.
1

Statement: As the red sun set, Adrin sat on the mound with his three friends, imagining the will of the Old One and what the titan might know of impacted brill colons. Choices:  1. Adrin was alone. 2. Adrin was with his friends. 3. Adrin was with his friends, who were all trained fighters.

1