Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.

No link to another story...not easy in these forums to post one, either.

However, your response shows you have an only slightly hidden agenda about something that, like what's indicated by your pseudonym, is legal and generally accepted in Oregon. I hope your use of 4:20 will lead to an expanded consciousness and acceptance.
No

Its a good thing you are around to tell us what visually constitutes what is a sufficiently enough female body. Slow down and really think about what you are saying, that you are going to base the way you treat someone on the way they appear to you, wether or not that person possesses any value is subject to your opinion of their bust-waist-hip ration and wether you find them sufficiently attractive enough to make them sexual targets. That is just gross.
Yes

There is a ton of data on bird collisions which are a decent analog to drones.  I worked on a Twin Otter that hit a seagull at ~ 120 knots.  The hit was on the leading edge of the wing, centered on a rib, strongest part of the surface.  The wing was caved all the way back to the spar, ~ 2 feet aft.  The deice boot was destroyed and significant trim was required to roll the aircraft back level.  Yeah, a drone would be  a nasty encounter.

Yes