TASK DEFINITION: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.
PROBLEM: Comment: A well articulated opinion. Sadly, Ms Wente grossly underestimates the power of the vast hordes of broader public sector employees and their Unions to mobilize the vote for whoever is promising the status quo for them. So long as they are kept in the lap of luxury, with all the attendant 5-star perks that others can only dream of, no party preaching fiscal restraint can ever win. Exactly what Justin did, promising to spend more.
For all of Trumps darker sides, his pro economy pro business model is slowly starting to appeal to voters of all stripes, except perhaps the extreme socialists. It would be nice of other mature economies can emulate Trumponomics minus the unpleasant elements like anti trade, anti [legal] immigrant policies.

SOLUTION: Non-sexual-explicit

PROBLEM: Comment: What's gonna change on the repubs agenda. They've been doing nothing for 8 yrs, what's 4 more gonna matter.
Do nothing repub congress,  all preachy and wanna get into women's vaginas & reproductive rights.  While your base of ol white guys die off what's plan B for 2020.

SOLUTION: Sexual-explicit

PROBLEM: Comment: What people don't realize is that the "swamp" is also houses Republicans.  Trump was doing business, and doing it well, when the swamp critters bit him in the ass and didn't pass his agenda. By ONE vote!  Thanx Mc Cain.  So Trump pivoted and threw the Demo's a bone.  Everyone said "Trump stabbed the Republicans in the back!"   No, they tripped him up, and he smacked them in the back of the head. I suggest the Republican party get in line, behind their LEADER, and support him!

SOLUTION:
Sexual-explicit