Given a document, an entity and its sentiment towards the entity, verify if it is the correct sentiment towards the entity. Answer should be yes or no. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

Q: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Stephanie O'Neill is Positive . Now we'd like to hear a bit more about the Thomas fire  the biggest fire in the region right now. Thomas has been burning since Monday across Ventura County  north of Los Angeles.  Reporter Stephanie O'Neill  lives in the city of Ojai and has been witnessing the destruction firsthand.  Stephanie   thanks so much for speaking with us.
 STEPHANIE  O'NEILL: You're welcome.
MARTIN: That's  reporter Stephanie O'Neill  talking to us from Ojai  Calif. - that's north of Los Angeles - with an update on the devastating fire that's burning there right now. Stephanie  thanks so much for speaking with us.
 O'NEILL : You're welcome.

A: yes
****
Q: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Trumper is Negative . Thatâs not too far of a fling  actually. One really bad move could do it  but  Trump  has insulated  himself  with people far more competent and worthy of  their  positions. To date   they âre keeping  him  from stepping over the edge.
I never thought he could do the job. Heâs made some solid moves in his first year in office  but I actually give the credit to those around him. As I said from the beginning  it was the Cabinet that would do the actual work  and much like his business dealings   Trump  would be the Ronald McDonald of politics.  He âs the face of the presidency  but the actual work is being done by somebody else.
Wolff leans to some old rumors in the book about Trumpâs campaign plans. Namely   he  never intended to be president.  He  was going to clean up by being the almost president  build up a ready-made audience  and launch a new TV network venture  TrumpTV.
Because nobody thought  he  would win  nobody prepared for the job. In fact  while  Trump  bragged openly to  his  glassy-eyed followers that  he âd finance  his  own campaign and be beholden to none (How many times did I hear a Trumper say  â He  canât be bought!â)   he  put very little of  his  own money into the campaign.  He  took donations  like every other candidate  but to this day  not a single  Trump  supporter can be convinced of that.
 He  didnât run  his  campaign like somebody that wanted to win. It was a show to  him .  He  was worthless in debates  because  he  obviously didnât understand the questions being asked of  him   but  his  base would flood online polls and declare  him  the winner  even before the debates were over (which tells me they didnât understand the questions  either  nor did they care).
 Trump  struck out at Wolff on Friday night (on Twitter  of course)  slamming  him  as a âloserâ and calling  his  book âboring and untruthful.â
Ok. Wolff  however  is thanking  Trump  for helping  him  sell books  which  in turn  is opening eyes.

A: no
****
Q: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Kesha is Neutral . The white rose movement was bolstered by one of the show-stopping moments of Grammys night: Kesha singing âPrayingâ with the help of fellow pop stars Cyndi Lauper  Bebe Rexha  Camila Cabello  Julia Michaels  and Andra Day  as well as The Resistance Revival Chorus. Prior to the show  Grammys producer Ken Ehrlich had said that âPrayingâ would have made an appearance regardless of "whether these past few months [of #MeToo] had happened or not.â But the song was charged with the context of the timeâand made a social statement more complicatedly powerful than might be expected.
 Kesha  released âPrayingâ as a comeback single after she underwent a very public legal fight with her producer and label boss  Dr. Luke  over her allegations that he harassed and raped her. He denied her claims  and a judge nixed her attempt to be released from her record contract. âPraying â an intense piano ballad put out through the label Luke founded  took a moving but oblique approach to the matter.  Kesha  sang to an unnamed someone who had harmed  her âto offer the hope that someday  his soul might be saved.
That somewhat saintly stance was emphasized tonight in the blazing white clothes of  Kesha  and  her  backup singers. A beautiful a cappella opening passage made the central lyricââsometimes  I pray for you at nightââunmissable. But  Keshaâs  intensity was not that of an exhortative preacher but of an actual  ailing human being.  She  didnât aim to hit the recorded versionâs high notes  but  her  quavering voice and knotted eyebrows communicated sentiment that only a cynic could called canned. When the song ended   she  broke down crying  and was embraced by  her  famous compatriots.
To anyone familiar with the specifics of  Keshaâs  situation and the state of the music industry  the subtext was not of total triumph. Over the decades  record companies have profited immensely from exactly the sort of exploitation of young female talent that  Kesha  accused Dr. Luke of partaking in. A study released by USC this past week brought stark confirmation of just how rare female singers  songwriters  and producers are in mainstream pop. And in the most important awards categories for this yearâs Grammys  women are sidelined: All the Record of the Year nominees are men  and only one woman is nominated in Album of the Year and Song of the Year.
To address this state of affairs   Kesha  offered not revolutionary anger but solidarity  catharsis  and a call to take the high road. When introducing  Kesha   Janelle Monae gave a crisp  rousing #MeToo-themed speech that told women  âWe have the power to undo the culture that does not serve us well.â The swelling sound of âPrayingâ suggested that taking power would happen at the same time as healing  and with surprising compassion for those whoâve caused the wounds.

A:
no
****