In this task, you're given a statement, and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence clearly disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3' corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.

Ex Input:
Statement: they just you know just just level the whole place and let it go but we're going to have to be over there and we're and our presence is going to have to be felt and they've got to be strong presidents or presence uh if we don't then i think that we're going to be back there Choices:  1. They need to destroy the place to be strong presidents. 2. They have to be weak presidents and not do anything. 3. We need to use a bunch of bombs.

Ex Output:
2


Ex Input:
Statement: Setting improvement goals is an important step in getting organizations across the government to engage seriously in the difficult task of change. Choices:  1. Improvement goals are easy to reach if everyone participated. 2. Setting improvement goals have zero impact on making government organizations to change. 3. Setting improvement goals is important to get organizations to engage in the idea of change.

Ex Output:
2


Ex Input:
Statement: Participants generally believed that the provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 should be implemented and assessed before the Congress should consider adding any new legislative requirements; however, participants agreed that much can and should be done by other responsible parties, such as by regulatory and self-regulatory bodies, within their existing authority. Choices:  1. People considered the Sarbanes-Oxley act to be a crucial piece of legislation. 2. They thought that Congress should add new rules before enacting the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. 3. People thought that the Sarbanes-Oxley act should go into effect before additional legislation rules were put in place.

Ex Output:

2