In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Example Input: Comment: Hi, ignoramus, love to see you in an alley way and
beat you with a louieville slugger. This will come 
to pas and whites will lose. Why, because they still
haven't even figured out which are men and which
are women. Terrible a race that can't even figure out
that born with a penis is male and a vagina is female.
Thank the Great one whites won't survive 50 more
years.
Example Output: Sexual-explicit

Example Input: Comment: Um, Bill Clinton paid Paula Jones almost a million dollars in a sexual harassment lawsuit. There are 18 other women- including Juanita Broaddrick who says Clinton raped her- who are sexual assault victims of Bill Clinton
Example Output: Sexual-explicit

Example Input: Comment: The primary mission of the university is the search for truth. Of course, free speech is part of that search. However, in the first 100 plus days, we  have been seeing a presentation of lies, falsehoods, fakery, double  and self-dealing, and his apparent obliviousness to all of this, including  the famous misogyny  statement ("...just grab em by the ...they let you do it..."), discredits his self-righteous cloak of true-believe Christianity. Not to mention his "...no knowledge of"...) statements about the national security advisor, or blind ignorance to the greed going around him. Those who walked out are exercising their right of free speech by refusing to listing to self-aggrandizing and phoney pap spewed by unctuous faux Americans. Those who walked out are stating that the search for truth ended sometime before he entered the room!
Example Output:
Non-sexual-explicit