In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Q: Comment: "40-20
12 hours ago
Labeling others with the intent to humiliate is what’s uncivil …… “homophobe”, “bigot”, “hatemonger”, “climate change denier”, “teabagger”, “racist”, “neocon”, “right wing extremist”, ad infinitum."

A: Non-sexual-explicit
****
Q: Comment: Quebec is absurd.

Why do I buy a CAA membership if I can't call them for a free tow?

And what kind of nitwit drives on a highway without knowing how much gas they have in the tank??!! In 40 years of driving I have never run out once.

A: Non-sexual-explicit
****
Q: Comment: "Léger poll conducted in August suggested that 28 per cent of Quebeckers would be less likely to vote for the NDP if it were led by a turbaned Sikh."

Its sad in 2017  that religious politicians do not comprehend that it is not fair to impose his or her meaning of the world on another. Religious garb in your face demonstrates that his belief takes precedence when in conflict. 

Religions have been the instrument of may conflicts in the world forever. Many thousand have lost their lives for their belief systems. Let's create a new society. Let's leave all the baggage; let's travel light.

Spirituality does not command a particular appearance; and if that's the priority that person must think twice..

A:
Non-sexual-explicit
****