In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Example Input: Comment: Then stop grabbing me by my male genitals, if you hate that phrasing.   When are liberals going to stop encouraging hate by pitting one group against another.
Anti-hate, proud, white, and unapologetic for all.
Example Output: Sexual-explicit

Example Input: Comment: Trid sees nothing wrong with "No Dogs or Jews", "We don't serve Muslims" and so on. He supports bigotry. And no, that is NOT a straw man, but the clear and obvious implication of your " If either the buyer or the seller does not want to enter into that contract for whatever reason then I believe they have the right to refuse." Thank you for proving that your claim to being a Christian is a complete sham.
Example Output: Non-sexual-explicit

Example Input: Comment: Rich,

  Don't you think Trump's supporters appreciate his twittering as having the common touch, keeping in touch with the people, and being transparent?
   At first I thought it was juvenile, stupid and unpresidential. But it has its upside. At least we all know what's on his mind - as opposed to, say, Stephen Harper.
  In my view, the juveniles are greedy middle class liberals who don't want to spread the wealth around, don't want to upset the !%, are afraid of their corporate employer, and refuse to admit any responsibility for all America's ills.
  They need to repent and change their evil ways.
  They should don sack cloth and ashes and parade down main street flagellating themselves with birch tree twigs. A little Christian repentance is a good thing.
Example Output:
Non-sexual-explicit