Given a passage with a context and an answer, construct a question on the basis of the information present in the passage. Construct the question in such a way that (i) it is unambiguous, (ii) it is answerable from the passage, (iii) its answer is unique (iv) it answer uses text phrases from the passage. Avoid creating questions that (i) can't be answered correctly without actually understanding the passage and (ii) uses the same words or phrases given in the passage.

[EX Q]: Context: Rural primary health centers frequently treat patients with tick bites. This study compares everyday clinical practice at our primary healthcare center to practices recommended by current scientific evidence.', 'To describe the everyday management of tick bites by different healthcare professionals and to compare this management to evidence-based therapy guidelines.', 'Cross-sectional, descriptive observational study.', 'Data was collected through an anonymous self-completed questionnaire. The form was filled out by a consecutive sample of nurses, physicians and pediatricians of the clinical management unit of Medina-Sidonia (Cádiz).', 'Most nurses in the sample group use some type of product to facilitate the extraction of the tick (10 of the 11 surveyed nurses, 90.9%). The most frequently used products were chloroethyl and local anesthetic. In addition, nine nurses use gentle traction with tweezers (81.82%) to remove the tick. In the physician sample group, 3 out of 12 respondents (25%) prescribe antibiotics in all cases and nine stated that they knew which antibiotic should be used as first choice. In both cases, a high number of healthcare providers confirm giving post-extraction advice to patients: 11 in the medical community (91.66%) and nine nurses (81.82%).
Answer: We conclude that the performance of the healthcare providers that integrate this study does not closely follow general recommendations for extraction, treatment and follow-up care in patients with tick bites. Therefore, there is a need to improve the level of knowledge to ensure quality care in these instances.
[EX A]: Does [ Descriptive study of healthcare professionals ' management of tick bite ]?

[EX Q]: Context: Droperidol is useful for postoperative sedation in infants and children after cardiac surgery because it provides sedation and akinesia with minimal respiratory depression. However, droperidol has been associated with QT prolongation and ventricular arrhythmias. We investigated, if neuroleptanalgesic doses of droperidol led to QT prolongation and cardiac arrhythmias in children undergoing cardiac surgery.', 'We retrospectively analysed electrocardiogram rhythm strips that were obtained before and in time increments after a 100 microg x kg(-1) intravenous bolus of droperidol in 20 children undergoing cardiac surgery. The longest QT interval was determined in each ECG and corrected for heart rate (QTc). All arrhythmias were recorded.', 'Droperidol led to a significant increase in QTc time that was still present at 15 min but had resolved within 30 min after the bolus. No associated arrhythmias were observed.
Answer: The statistically significant prolongation of QTc time after a sedative dose of droperidol is of concern because it may increase the risk for malignant cardiac arrhythmias. A large, prospective study is necessary to identify the true risk for arrhythmias after droperidol in this patient population, but our study suggests that any arrhythmogenic risk, if present, will be very transient, since the increase in QTc time was limited to a period of less than 30 min after the bolus.
[EX A]: Does droperidol for perioperative sedation cause a transient prolongation of the QTc time in children under volatile anesthesia?

[EX Q]: Context: To determine whether self-reports of delayed care predict increased mortality and functional decline in community-dwelling elderly.', 'Longitudinal cohort study.', 'Five counties in North Carolina.', 'A total of 4,162 randomly sampled individuals aged 65 and older.', "The primary outcome was the proportional hazard ratio (HR) for death in cohorts stratified by self-reports of delayed or foregone care. A secondary outcome, functional decline, measured the cohorts' odds of developing increased dependency in activities of daily living (ADLs). Control variables included predisposing, enabling, and need factors.", 'Of 3,964 eligible participants reporting, 61% never, 27% once in a while, and 12% quite often delayed care. Over 3 years, 13% of participants died, and 17% developed increased ADL dependency. Nevertheless, in unadjusted and adjusted models, neither 3-year mortality HRs nor the odds of functional decline differed between cohorts reporting varying degrees of delayed care. Survival probabilities remained higher for 15 years among those reporting delaying care often.
Answer: The inability of self-reported delay to predict adverse outcomes in community-dwelling elderly suggests the need for better understanding and support of the care-seeking process and additional measures of timeliness of access.
[EX A]:
Does self-reported delay in seeking care have poor validity for predicting adverse outcomes?