In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

[Q]: Comment: You do realize I'm sure that HRC campaign has successfully used fear to control the loyal subjects of the dem. party. It really is sad to see just how easy these voters are manipulated. She has disdain for her supporters but they refuse to allow that into their narrow vision.  DT has a unsavory past with his words. HRC has a corrupted past. However her ardent supports find more fault with mere words then they do with actions because the actions were committed by a dem. Pitiful that we have come to this point. You know, Nixon had to resign due to his cover-up, how many more cover-ups is HRC involved in? But again, since she has a "D" behind her name the ignorant dem. voters will either ignore, or more likely,  condone the criminal. The good news, her day is coming where she will be held accountable, the bad news, if she is elected first we get that insane Kaine. WLTDO, question for you, do you think the puppets even bother to read the leaks? I don't, they haven't been told to.
[A]: Non-sexual-explicit


[Q]: Comment: ADN censors a penis but not the bloody head of the president? Interesting.
[A]: Sexual-explicit


[Q]: Comment: The website fee says $30.  If there was a change for Alaska it should have been noted in the article.  The impression given in the article was that it was free.  Just making sure sufficient information is available for all to make a decision about the operation.  The website also asks for donations, so reporting on the totality of financial health of this group should be part of the reporting.  Too many groups claiming aid for or helping others are nothing except profiteering scams.
[A]:
Non-sexual-explicit