instruction:
In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.
question:
Comment: A witch hunt, nothing more nothing less. Did she give any thought to the 3,000 who died in New York and what success has the ICC had to date with the untold $millions which have been spent by this elitist "old boys' club". Pray tell why the Sudanese President is still at large and Mugabe travels freely throughout the world? Ermine robed, latte sipping parasites - that is the ICC.
answer:
Non-identity-attack


question:
Comment: I knew it. I knew that whatever Dingman used as a title to his column, whatever his opening paragraphs were, I knew Dingman would end up in the same place he always ends up. I knew he'd end up promoting the same nonsensical garbage that the laziest of lazy journalists always promote; that being the false equivalency and both siderist trash that people like Dingman, Ron Fournier and David Brooks always promote.  

No matter the specific issue or situation, Dingman is just like a parrot that keeps squawking "brawk brawk, both sides, both sides, brawk brawk.

Dingman says both conventions were equally marred by "disunity". But even the master of the false equivalency, the Ayatollah of both siderism, David Brooks, even he wasn't brushing the conventions with his usual both siderist paint.  

Early in his column, Dingman refers to the "political cluelessness" of others. But if he  wants to see a living, breathing example of political cluelessness, all he needs is a mirror.
answer:
Non-identity-attack


question:
Comment: All of this is a prime example of what happens when you have politicians who have spent their entire existence in government. It also shows you that people need to stop worshiping these same politicians. How can we as a public be so stupid as to not see anything wrong with F.B.I. being controlled, threatened, cajoled, manipulated etc.etc. by other parts of government? The NeoCons and the democrats are on the same side and they are a complete danger to the Republic. There is ample evidence of collusion by all parties involved to protect Hil. yet, the left doesn't care. They simply don't care. Those on the left want to be ruled and have the government control their lives. Why, I don't know but all of this indifference is proof that there is a cult of personality for certain politicians. If people really wanted to show they wanted to hold officials held accountable, they would throw Hil. in prison and be done with it.
answer:

Non-identity-attack