We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

Example Input: Citing the Second Amendment and the increasingly maniacal rhetoric of conservative media firebrands, a small handful of violence-threatening protesters aims to make the rest of us -- whether pro- or anti-health-reform -- afraid to speak out.
Example Output: Valid

Example Input: As to all of the other demands for more and more and more and more and more, gun control, then a never ending list loopholes on all that is proposed, see the last 300 iterations of this exact same thread.
Example Output: Valid

Example Input: THe ban on these weapons is roughly equivelant to incumbent protection laws.
Example Output:
Valid