In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

[EX Q]: Sentence: Sam's drawing was hung just above Tina's and it did look much better with another one below it.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to sam's drawing because it's a pretty well known thing, a drawing of a fish that has a fishy body with. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
[EX A]: Wrong

[EX Q]: Sentence: The trophy doesn't fit into the brown suitcase because it is too small.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the suitcase because the brown suitcase is too large. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
[EX A]: Correct

[EX Q]: Sentence: The path to the lake was blocked, so we couldn't reach it .
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the lake because because lake was target point we could not reach the lake of path block. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
[EX A]:
Correct