In this task, you will be shown a sentence, and you should determine whether it is overruling or non-overruling. In law, an overruling sentence is a statement that nullifies a previous case decision as a precedent by a constitutionally valid statute or a decision by the same or higher ranking court which establishes a different rule on the point of law involved. Classify your answers into overruling or non-overruling

Q: having considered the present appeal in banc in order to clarify our precedents with respect to the scope of the government's navigational servitude, we now reverse the judgment of the claims court, overrule those portions of pitman and ballam which are inconsistent with the following opinion, and remand this case for further proceedings not inconsistent herewith.

A: overruling
****
Q: to the extent they are inconsistent with our analysis, we disapprove darden v. general motors corp., supra, 40 cal.app.4th 342, and its progeny, barr v. acands, inc. (1997) 57 cal.app.4th 1038.

A: overruling
****
Q: in concluding that in situations not subject to a specified exclusion, section 3051 supersedes section 1170.1, subdivision (c), trejo invoked the statutory maxim of construction, ""expressio unius est exclusio alterius, if exemptions are specified in a statute, [a court] may not imply additional exemptions unless there is a clear legislative intent to the contrary.""

A:
non-overruling
****