Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.

Example Input: Too bad Jolly is getting so little support.   Even worse,  I would guess  a majority of the  voting public is unaware of the time their representatives  spend fund raising.   

Very few people would argue that large private institutions have influence on legislation.   At best, money donations provide very unequal access to those who guide legislation through congress.  At worst, it's a legal bribe.

We've put our legislators and  in a position of begging, not leading,    Sadly, it is the professional leadership of The Party that makes sure it's members play nice and cooperate - or they don't get their share of the booty.    

My hat is off for the brave few, like Jolly and Nolan, who are trying to shed the light on a corrupt process.
Example Output: No

Example Input: So what's with the "homosexual agenda"
remark? My parents were strictly anti-gay, but they had me. Everyone in my family and everyone I dealt with as a child was straight. I didn't fit the frggin mold! Uh-oh! My parents hate me! My Sunday school teacher hates me! I'm evil, a sinner, going to hell-oh no! Maybe if I pretend! (This is where a lot of gay youth turn to drug or suicide.) Lucky me, I met some people who were like me. I even fell in love. I want to marry that person, but it doesn't suit ---- you??? Because I won't have children? Thr human race won't perish if a few of us don't reproduce. The Bundys and Duggars of the world will see to that.
Example Output: Yes

Example Input: Sadly, your perfect God aborts thousands daily. Sadly, just tell a rape victim "to keep her legs closed". Since many in your con-camp don't agree with telling a woman she can't have an abortion if she was raped, that exception takes away any and all other arguments against a woman's right to choose.
Example Output:
Yes