In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Input: Consider Input: Comment: George Soros funds country destroying leftist, anarchist, marxist, burn it down groups all over the world. He makes billions by manipulating the financial markets, never caring if a country and all its people suffer from his screwing with currencies and economies. Soros is Mr. Evil... for real... and its probably just a left over from the days when he betrayed Jews in Nazis Germany and actually participated in seizing Jewish property and profiting from it. A true scum of the earth person.

Output: Non-sexual-explicit


Input: Consider Input: Comment: Peeing in the park/alley when you think no one is looking is not an offense that requires registration as a sex offender in the State of Colorado. It does not meet the elements of Indecent Exposure, which requires a KNOWING exposure of genitals to the view of another person when done with the intent to arouse. It also does not meet the elements of Public Indecency (which only requires registration after a second conviction within 5 years), which requires a KNOWING exposure of genitals to the view of another person.

Also, the juvenile sex offender registry is not made available to the public in the same way as the adult sex offender registry. And first-time juvenile sex offenders are able to petition for de-registration once they have successfully completed their sentence.

Output: Sexual-explicit


Input: Consider Input: Comment: His comment was totally out of line - judges should be far more sensitive. It was clear the girl was having consensual sex and the accused was not guilty as the 2nd trail shown. However, there was no need for such rather politically toxic comment / hurtful / etc.

Someone should also investigate how this even went to trail in the first place - didn't the prosecutor gather evidence and vet the case? How much of taxpayer money was spent on this?


Output: Sexual-explicit