TASK DEFINITION: Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
PROBLEM: The primary reason this project has involved so much construction and costs is the city's commitment to "level of service", which means we won't ever put in transit, pedestrian or cycling amenities that would adversely impact the travel times of single occupant vehicles. 

Agencies that pay attention to the data, like the federal highway administration and CalTrans, have largely done away with LOS. They have rightfully accepted the science that has proven induced demand (building more travel lanes induces more extra driving than those lanes can handle, thus increasing congestion; one trip to SoCal shows what this means).

Here, our backwards traffic planners/engineers continue to be beholden to a failed model. These bozos even shut down the Fern Ridge bike path for half a year (again!) for work that should have taken less than two weeks.

Eugene needs to fire its city manager and all of his managers for at least four tiers down. These people just aren't up to the task.

SOLUTION: No

PROBLEM: Brian, thanks for very well written, but also disturbing, piece. You defend yourself very well against protestors and some iconic straw-man "the left" who accuse you, ironically, of believing what your candidate says he believes. 

Will your vote determined by some angry protestors and "the left?" I certainly don't call you racist, sexist, or ignorant. But I do ask, will you vote for a man who says what Mr. Trump says about Mexicans, Muslims, blacks, and women? Who ignores decades of foreign policy, and jumps to dangerous conclusions repeatedly? Who promises to deport 11 million people? Who would exclude immigrants on the basis of religious beliefs? You redefine him as "a fighter." Do you just disbelieve everything he says? 

And I'd join you, whole heartedly, in objecting to the name calling, polarizing, demeaning, common-enemy tactics of those protesters.  ... if you weren't using them to defend a man whose campaign has ridden those same tactics to unprecedented levels.

SOLUTION: Yes

PROBLEM: The primary reason this project has involved so much construction and costs is the city's commitment to "level of service", which means we won't ever put in transit, pedestrian or cycling amenities that would adversely impact the travel times of single occupant vehicles. 

Agencies that pay attention to the data, like the federal highway administration and CalTrans, have largely done away with LOS. They have rightfully accepted the science that has proven induced demand (building more travel lanes induces more extra driving than those lanes can handle, thus increasing congestion; one trip to SoCal shows what this means).

Here, our backwards traffic planners/engineers continue to be beholden to a failed model. These bozos even shut down the Fern Ridge bike path for half a year (again!) for work that should have taken less than two weeks.

Eugene needs to fire its city manager and all of his managers for at least four tiers down. These people just aren't up to the task.

SOLUTION:
No