We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

Example Input: The laws being proposed are serving no purpose, because they're not being enforced.
Example Output: Valid

Example Input: The Second Amendment was never about individual gun ownership, it's only purpose was proper case of a government organized and controlled militia."
Example Output: Valid

Example Input: Government(s) definitely have to regulate themselves as far as gun laws go because the 2nd Amendment, even though it is vaguely written, is definitely at the top of people's lists of important rights.
Example Output:
Valid