In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

Example Input: Sentence: The firemen arrived before the police because they were coming from so far away.
 Reason: The 'they' refers to the police because only the police could have pulled the firemen out of the burning building. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Example Output: Wrong

Example Input: Sentence: James asked Robert for a favor but he refused.
 Reason: The 'he' refers to robert because the favor was not answered. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Example Output: Correct

Example Input: Sentence: John was jogging through the park when he saw a man juggling watermelons. He was very impressed.
 Reason: The 'He' refers to john because he is the only person in the entire world to have seen the He in person. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Example Output:
Wrong