In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

[Q]: Comment: "Except in the narrowest circumstances, no one should be forced to choose between living out his or her faith and complying with the law," Sessions wrote. 

So, if my religion tells me to beat my wife, drive drunk and discriminate against gay people, I should be allowed to do that regardless of the law?
[A]: Identity-attack


[Q]: Comment: The economy has been on a record upswing, building the Permanent Fund to where it is today ... and sooner or later, it will fall into a record downswing.  There may be no Permanent Fund earnings for some years to come, it may even lose over half of its value ... and then what?  The fund lost 3 billion in January, but was rescued in a temporary market correction.  Our legislators are foolish children, playing with fire ... and it is the people who will get burned.  On top of that, the fund lost two of the most competent managers it has ever had, who had overseen the biggest single growth in the history of the fund ... all because the legislators saved a few pennies by not giving them a decent raise or bonus.
[A]: Non-identity-attack


[Q]: Comment: Women dont fly fish they just fry fish in the kitchen 😂
[A]:
Identity-attack