In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: threat and non-threat. Threat is a statement that someone will be hurt or harmed, especially if the person does not do something in particular.

Q: Comment: Love it!  Alas, though, there are no fun non-derogatory nouns for the male equivalent of tomboy.  My son's choices will be relegated to "sissy"/"mama's boy" or "variant"/"nonconforming".   Yes, he's a "boy" and "human" -- but as you noted, the power of self-identification as something cool and different can be magical.

A: Non-threat
****
Q: Comment: Tokuda is gradstanding.... if not she is badly ignorant about financing these projects. Perhaps she has to go to Washington to find out for herself.

A: Non-threat
****
Q: Comment: You idea about offensive art is dumb and irrelevant.
The baker has made many cakes for gay weddings, he just does not know it. When he learns he is making a cake for a gay wedding, he is suddenly offended?

Let’s say a wedding planner goes into Jack Philips cake shop and orders an elaborate, custom wedding cake.
It has 10 layers and has a mountain stream of icing cascading down the layers tha t look like mountains. It is stunning. The baker is beyond proud of his work. He accepts payment and the wedding planner takes it away. What a feel good story!

But wait. The wedding planner never told the baker the cake is for a gay wedding. The cake is rolled out at the gay wedding and is eaten, because it is a cake.

Does thst take away from the baker? Is he less proud of his work if he finds out it was in a gay wedding?
Does it make it less of a cake? Is it less of a work of art?

The baker is choosing to be offended. It is immature.

A:
Non-threat
****