We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

If both acheive the same goal of keeping society away from harm, then why go overboard in reducing the criminals rights by killing him?
Valid

People seem to be trying to evade the issue, there's one person, who says Durr raped and murdered Angel Vincent and no other evidence.
Invalid

Anyway, with that I would actually favor allowing criminals to choose death as long as they choose death with no appeals.

Valid