instruction:
The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the no-need strategy, otherwise output No. no-need is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used when a participant points out that they do not need an item based on personal context such as suggesting that they have ample water to spare. no-need can directly benefit the opponent since it implies that the item is up for grabs.
question:
Context: 'Hi, I brought some water with me. How much do you need? '
Utterance: 'I want 2 liters of water'
answer:
No


question:
Context: 'True we can , I'd be willing to just take one of the foods if you'd be willing to do that ? Then we can decide on the others ' '🙂v it sound's like we're on the right track! I'll gladly take 2 Food. How would you feel about taking all of the Water, while I take all of the Firewood?' 'Not really liking that , but I'd be willing to split the water with you if I could take 2 of those 🙂'
Utterance: 'OK, you take 2 of the Water, and I take 1. That just leaves the Firewood. How about 2 for me and 1 for you?'
answer:
No


question:
Context: 'Hello, i also need firewood, i have a medical condition where it is very hard to maintain my body temperature. ' 'My wife is in the same boat. That sucks. I wonder if it will be cold.' 'Well i do not need the water at all as i have a distiller'
Utterance: 'And I have plenty of food as I'm the only over eater of the group.'
answer:

Yes