In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence can be inferred from the statement. Incorrect choices change the meaning in important ways or have details that are not mentioned in the statement. Indicate your answer as 1,2, or 3 corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.

Q: Statement: A good case study reports methodological strengths and limitations for answering the evaluation questions and explains the tradeoffs that were considered and who influenced the decisions. Choices:  1. Limitations of the methodology used should not be discussed in the case study report. 2. Decision influencers can have a negative impact on the study's credibility. 3. Tradeoffs can be made during a case study, and should be disclosed.

A: 3
****
Q: Statement: Ca'daan saw two whipmasters fleeing on horseback. Choices:  1. Ca'daan saw the men going off into the distance. 2. The men were running towards Ca'daan. 3. Ca'daan watched the men as they were more than a mile away.

A: 1
****
Q: Statement: cashews or something like that right um-hum well Spinoccoli she can't patent the idea though because Pizza Inn already already has it but it's a it's very good well they put it they i guess they put like the dough and then the sauce and then Choices:  1. She can patent the idea because no one else has it already. 2. Spinoccoli is a very popular recipe and very profitable. 3. Pizza Inn already has the patent for Spinoccoli.

A:
3
****