We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

[EX Q]: Sent1: The death penalty is not deterrance for the person executed.
 Sent2: Peterson could face the death penalty or life without parole.
[EX A]: Not similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: If it must be, then we shall find a way to improve these peoples habits, not kill them because they aren't 'like us'.
 Sent2: When a person does something horrible, we no longer see them as a human that values their life, we just see them as an epitome of hate.
[EX A]: Not similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: I don't think the death penalty should be banned.
 Sent2: With all that it has been a very trying time for me and I have had to struggle with how I really felt about the death penalty.
[EX A]:
Not similar