We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Sent1: I like guns as much as the normal person does but if guns are abused by people, we need restictions.
 Sent2: I like how anti gun people say we need to protect everyone from the rare gun events by banning guns, but when someone suggests banning the more frequent hammer and club attacks, they can justify those deaths.
Not similar

Sent1: I don`t reallly see the inconsistency unless you view the right to keep andbear arms as a right that should be protected.
 Sent2: This makes sense when you consider that the second amendment protects the right of the people to bear arms in connection with an organized militia.
Not similar

Sent1: Usually it is 'oh look out look out, them gun nuts are going to do something.
 Sent2: If it was just a gun thing then they could go from internation flights from countries with no guns, but it isn't.

Not similar