In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

[Q]: Comment: Its funny watching the left twist themselves into knots defending religious views that literally oppress women.

This is why the left cannot be taken seriously on almost any matter. The same hypocrites who ranted and raved about Donald Trump were silent about Harvey Weinstein. They have marches and wear ribbons and talk about women’s rights and then say we have no right to step in when a religion oppresses women on what they can wear or do. 

Meanwhile if a Christian says women shouldn’t be allowed to have an abortion they go ape**** protest and riot saying and I quote “no one should be able to tell a woman what to do with her body”. How the F is this any different?

The selective and hypocritical morality of the left should be ignored as it is nonsensical and illogical. The ban should stand, otherwise what the law is saying is all religions are equal, except for islam which will get an exception every time. Thus the beginning of sharia law.
[A]: Non-sexual-explicit


[Q]: Comment: You don't have a strong erection? Bummer for you. Try not drinking alcohol and exercise.
[A]: Sexual-explicit


[Q]: Comment: Your ignorant, this woman paid many many years of income tax before shortsightedness took it away and here we are. How do you know she does not work? She does receive an income, a pension thus she will pay taxes. You have not facts no basis for you Union Corruption" statement which makes you zero credible, have a nice day.
[A]:
Non-sexual-explicit