In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: insult and non-insult. Insult is any lanugage or act that is disrespectful or scornfully abusive.

[EX Q]: Comment: All methods of reducing dental decay should be employed - It's something to consider.

Explain how, when water containing 0.7 mg/l fluoride ions has never been considered a medication, fluoridation opponents can claim the water treatment method is forced medication.  It would be like me claiming disinfection is forced poisoning and demanding that it be stopped.  Chlorine gas is a known chemical weapon, bleach is a strong poison that no one would want to drink, and studies on disinfection byproducts have shown they are poisonous at high exposure levels - would you want to drink a glass of chloroform?

Fluoridation opponents invent definitions to fit their agenda when there is absolutely no support for those claims.
[EX A]: Non-insult

[EX Q]: Comment: Umm, there was a play that had an Obama look alike killed.  You just don't know it because as a Trump follower you blindly follow without research.  The left did not turn the play into political rhetoric.  They just went about their day.  Your turn.
[EX A]: Non-insult

[EX Q]: Comment: I think this is the beginning of a conversation with China that has to take place.  Otherwise the problem you don't want to face will jump up and bite you in the a**.
[EX A]:
Non-insult