In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Comment: So you sidestep the issue by changing the subject to the definition of "Church," then you suggest we drop the discussion.  Let me just finish, then, by saying that anal penetration is not an act of love.
Sexual-explicit

Comment: If the Democrats had any brains they would never "block" a Supreme Court nominee just based on ideology.  If they are not qualified that is one thing but if they are not a left winger that is nonsense.  Maybe the Republicans should then block any leftie from the court who is otherwise qualified.  This kind of stuff is what ruins our entire system and makes people not trust it at all.  We want good judges who are not buried in ideology but can rule on the facts and the law.  How hard is that?  Often, it is much easier than checking a potential ruling against a certain ideology.  Try it!
Non-sexual-explicit

Comment: Where is the Clinton "Fake News" I never had sex with that woman?

Sexual-explicit