In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

[EX Q]: Comment: "Catholicism implies a kind of politics, not of left vs. right, but of the common good."  Yes msw.   Remarkable though --  ---- all your political opinions (which you ever remind us reflect the "real" Catholicism) are always a Xerox of DNC boilerplate.   Except on abortion, of course.   One has to eat.
[EX A]: Non-obscene

[EX Q]: Comment: Interesting. The CBC ministry of truth. The MSM manufactured truth. Truth and nothing but the truth. 
"Tell the truth" says Will Smith.
The truth is the truth and when you have a good truth it's because it's the truth.
[EX A]: Non-obscene

[EX Q]: Comment: Another papist preferring religious dictators over Constitutional Republic freedom.  A column filled with blind devotion to anti-human, anti-Constitutional, anti-freedom religious dogma. intelligent analysis of the performance of Roman Catholic judges and legislators is falsely portrayed as somehow demeaning to all of the church and its followers.  Since much of Roman Catholic dogma is anti-human rights, the truth just hurts too much.  Claiming to be a democrat in the past is just one more example of the new Trump Truthers more than willing to lie through their teeth in any forum to support Il Duce.
[EX A]:
Non-obscene