We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Sent1: Most gun owners are just ordinary people who happen to own a firearm.
 Sent2: I like guns as much as the normal person does but if guns are abused by people, we need restictions.
Not similar

Sent1: Some people who want to ban guns try to use simplistic arguments to suggest that murder rates are tied to the number of guns available for criminal misuse; and they suggest more guns = more crime and less guns = less crime.
 Sent2: All that does is imply that crime rate depends on more than just the presence/absence of guns - it disproves 'more guns = more crime' about as much as it disproves 'more guns = less crime'.
Similar

Sent1: The numbers above tend to indicate that fewer gun-related homicides is a direct result of stricter gun control laws.
 Sent2: Australia, for example, hasn't had one single mass shooting since it passed stricter gun laws over ten years ago.

Similar