In this task, you're given a pair of sentences, sentence 1 and sentence 2. Your job is to determine if the two sentences clearly agree/disagree with each other, or if this can't be determined. Indicate your answer as yes or no respectively.

Q: Sentence 1: This corruption and authoritarianism have irked democracy advocates, but it has not been enough to fully discredit Tudjman. Sentence 2: Tudjman is no longer credible to anyone after corruption took place.

A: yes
****
Q: Sentence 1: Nowhere else in the Caribbean can you eat as imaginatively or as well. Sentence 2: Caribbean food is a special kind of food.

A: yes
****
Q: Sentence 1: On the other hand, they are clearly at fault about many of its provisions. Sentence 2: Problems arose because of their doing.

A:
no
****