Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.

Ex Input:
Sooner later we'll have to stand up to the troublemakers.

Ex Output:
Yes


Ex Input:
No I did not. You promoted the idea that children are sissies if they can't take pain.

I simply counter pointed that with the fact that physical pain is not a gauge of anything and if you want to call kids sissies for not wanting to get hurt. 

This while the adult population of this countries is undergoing a rash of adults hooked on opiate pain killers, because you know, adults use medicine to take care of and manage their pain, but lets not do that for children cause we don't want them soft. Right?

Just because we as a society don't agree with the idea of children in pain doesn't make us wussies or sissies or wimps or whatever name you have poised on your tongue to call us. It means we care about children and want them to have a better life than us, and if it is one filled with less pain, I do not see how that is a bad thing. Care to enlighten me how it is a good thing?

Ex Output:
Yes


Ex Input:
Or this one, since we're fantasizing:  1.  Today, we learned about covalent bonds in the chem lab.  2. We heard a car horn!  The school is on lockdown and there may be an earthquake at ANY MOMENT.  Someone said something about an astroid that might hit us some day! Also, someone saw a muslim guy who looked suspicious!  We're going to hide under our desks until Pete Kelly saves us with his magic laws!
Only a coward needs a gun to feel safe in a free society.  Yeah, you might get punched in the nose or struck by lightning.  Or, shot by some moron who doesn't like the way you drive.  My point is, there is always some risk of disaster or violence.  In my privileged, reasonably safe little part of the universe (USA), that risk is so small that I'm not going to waste my time worrying about it; seriously, I have better things to do.

Ex Output:

Yes