In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine the neutral choice based on your inference from the statement and your commonsense knowledge. The neutral choice is a sentence that neither agrees nor disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3', corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence. If sentence X agrees with sentence Y, one's correctness follows from the other one. If sentence X disagrees with sentence Y, they can not be correct at the same time.

Ex Input:
Statement: New illumination was installed in 1985 to light up the tower from within, and it was the obvious main focus of France's celebrations for the change of the millennium in 1999. Choices: 1. The New Illumination was installed to light up the Eiffel Tower.   2. The New Illumination was not in place to celebrate the new millennium.   3. The New Illumination was the main focus for the new millennium celebrations.  

Ex Output:
1


Ex Input:
Statement: But at a certain point, isn't it only human to want to engage this man? Choices: 1. Shouldn't we try to have a dialogue with him? 2. It would be inhuman not to talk to this man. 3. Even after all avenues are exhausted, the one thing we should do is never talk to this man.

Ex Output:
2


Ex Input:
Statement: Steps nearby lead underground to the Lapis Niger, a black marble pavement laid by Julius Caesar over the presumed grave of Romulus, the city's founder. Choices: 1. Julius Caesar laid several hundred pavements in many countries. 2. Julius Caesar did not lay a black marble pavement. 3. Julius Caesar laid at least one black marble pavement in his life.

Ex Output:

1