We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Example Input: Sent1: If we can not prevent the innocent from unjust punishment, we should not have the death penalty.
 Sent2: The fact is that as long as we have a death penalty (the only Western nation to have it), we will execute innocents with the guilty.
Example Output: Similar

Example Input: Sent1: DNA technology could be required for the death penalty making it far less likely that an innocent is sentenced to death.
 Sent2: My argument makes it clear that innocent people need not be sentenced to death in order for the death penalty to be unjust.
Example Output: Not similar

Example Input: Sent1: After all, the person you're torturing may actually be innocent.
 Sent2: You make it sound as though if someone is innocent, of anything, they should be killed.
Example Output:
Not similar