instruction:
The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.
question:
Context: 'ok' 'then what will do ? if you ok for 3 food for me , 3 firefor you, 2 water for me , for this deal we can go forward?' 'of course not. you just took all the priority items and you still want two water. I am going to make the last offer. you take two food and two water, I take one food, three wood and aone water. '
Utterance: 'bro  make food as 3 and send me offer on that box'
answer:
No


question:
Context: 'I like firewood and water most' 'Hmm okay, I am willing to give you three waters! I was hoping to get 3 firewood though, as it's going to be really cold where I am going.' 'seems like we have same priority items. firewood. I also need firewood most because I am prone to pneumonia '
Utterance: 'Oh no, I'm so sorry to hear that ☹️ Let me ask about the food first then, would you be willing to give me the 3 packages of that? I am going to have a lot of people with me and we won't be near any stores at all.'
answer:
Yes


question:
Context: 'That is fair. Could I also have 1 food so I do not starve' 'what about your basic food rations?' 'I am severely malnourished and could use just one more food please'
Utterance: 'we got kids on this trip, they need food too.  also, your basic supplies should keep you fed well enough to not starve/be malnourished'
answer:

Yes