You are given first 5 messages from a series of message exchanges between 2 persons playing the game of Diplomacy which is an American strategic board game. You need to generate the next message. The message should be generated such that it fits the context seen so far. Avoid the text that is (i) tangent to the context, (ii) repeats the context.

Input: Consider Input: ["Greetings, Russia!\n\nWe don't have too much to discuss early on, but I was curious on whether or not you were planning to move A Moscow - St Petersburg, where you could make a play for Norway.\n\nAnd likewise, was curious whether you planned to order F Sevestapol - Black Sea, or else allow Turkey to occupy it.\n\nIt's early, but we might have room to cooperate against England or Germany in the future. Let's keep in touch. Good luck.", "I'd be very interested in organizing a group effort against Britain right now. I likely won't move to Saint Petersburg the first turn in case the Germans try something but I'm definitely bouncing in the Black sea.", "Understood, what's your plan then? \n\nYou might consider Moscow to Livonia, which would still improve your situation in the north (since you could convoy to Sweden and then build in StP), while also helping to cover Warsaw.\n\nOr else you could just commit both of your armies to the south.", "I've spoken with the Germans, and a group effort against the British is likely. I'm still considering various ways to secure my position better, but I think keeping one army put in Moscow offers the best stability for the time being; If the Germans are telling the truth it will likely move to secure a spot in Finland in the second year.", "I would advise against staying put. Both Ukraine and Livonia can defend 3/4 of your centers. St Petersburg  can't be attacked year 1 and the risk to Sevestapol is nominal in year 1, since even if he goes all out you bounce him out of Black Sea and he can only make an unsupported attempt from Armenia"]

Output: Going to Livonia is just as good for defending against Germany but gives you more options in the North


Input: Consider Input: ['Hey neighbour :3 If we put our minds to it, we can either work amazingly together this game or flail pointlessly at one another while other powers rise and rise (and rise). \n\nI’d really like to work towards option one, so let’s agree not to attack each other between Ven - Tri? At least not this year? We have more important things to do.', "That sounds good to me. I'm wary of Germany, will you watch my back if I watch yours?", 'I haven’t heard anything from Germany to suggest they have designs on you, but I’ll keep an eye out in comms! We all have a stake in keeping Tyrolia free. Have you spoken with Russia yet?', "They seem nice enough just wanted to be careful since they haven't been speaking as much. Russia seems nice enough, haven't really gotten any info from Russia.", 'Russia said something to be about an alliance before, the three of us against Turkey before we turn our gaze westward. Did he mention that to you? And if so, how do you feel about it?']

Output: Italy vs Turkey is almost classic, though it does depend on an agreement like the one we discussed ^^


Input: Consider Input: ['Hey Russia, would you be open to not moving an army north? I’m not interested in taking StP', 'Austria is pushing Italy to not do a lepanto but to go west. That might mean that Turkey is going north with Austria.', 'Thanks for the info! I trust that you  don’t want to take StP, an army north could help me put you into Norway though', 'I’ll be ok in Norway without your army in StP. I view A Mos - StP in spring 1901 as a strong anti-England move and building F StP(nc) as equally anti-England', 'Are we still good up north? I’m not interested in fighting you right now, and would prefer to just use a fleet to capture Nrwy.\n\nCan you promise to not send Mos northward this turn?']


Output: Of course, I wasn't trying to be  sneaky with my suggestion. I understand your concern and will not move StP North.