Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.

Example Input: Stay off of porn sites.
Example Output: Yes

Example Input: "Each side takes the position of the man who was arrested for swinging his arms and hitting another in the nose, and asked the judge if he did not have a right to swing his arms in a free country. 'Your right to swing your arms ends just where the other man’s nose begins.' " (From a June 1919 Harvard Law Review article by legal philosopher Zechariah Chafee, Jr. titled “Freedom of Speech in War Time”) http://quoteinvestigator.com/2011/10/15/liberty-fist-nose/

If the Little Sisters of the Poor don't themselves believe in using contraception, they have the (religious) freedom to not use it. But when they start trying to impose their beliefs on employees, who might believe otherwise, they are going beyond their own (religious) freedoms and trying to impose their beliefs on others, i.e., to restrict the freedoms of others.

Yes, the lawyers can cite case law and legal doctrine. But none of that changes the basic principle that your freedoms end when you try to extend them to my body.
Example Output: No

Example Input: Pure and simple...squelching democracy is the goal.
Our North Shore neighborhood needs a forum to address the many developers who want a piece of Old Hawaii at the expense of local residents. We need the platform to address the agrochemical companies who poison our environment everyday. We need our voices heard!
We need our issues televised by O'lelo. 
To eliminate Neighborhood Boards is to eliminate the democratic process!
Example Output:
No