In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Ex Input:
Comment: Trid sees nothing wrong with "No Dogs or Jews", "We don't serve Muslims" and so on. He supports bigotry. And no, that is NOT a straw man, but the clear and obvious implication of your " If either the buyer or the seller does not want to enter into that contract for whatever reason then I believe they have the right to refuse." Thank you for proving that your claim to being a Christian is a complete sham.

Ex Output:
Non-sexual-explicit


Ex Input:
Comment: Here is another one that doesn't care to check data or present proof. Isn't it time we demand from these charlatans the good-old obligation of no lying?

Ex Output:
Non-sexual-explicit


Ex Input:
Comment: I can get behind what you're saying. But our society is obsessed with crying for equality. Same kind of example happens when an older male teacher statutorily rapes a younger girl but an older female teacher seduces a younger boy. The hipocrisy of crying for equality when you really mean special privileges

Ex Output:

Sexual-explicit