In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

[EX Q]: Comment: Might as well breakout the ass trays and allow smoking inside. Lol. I eat peanuts or some type of treenut everyday in the comforts of my own home. I've always considered others in public settings and made sure I didn't bring traces to these areas. McD's has lost my respect and business on this decision.  Not sure why I support those who are affected by allergies but I'm glad I'm not ignorant to their struggles.
[EX A]: Non-identity-attack

[EX Q]: Comment: Quote: "Michelle Obama is taking some heat for recent remarks she made on gender, but I'm struggling to muster outrage given the sheer incoherence of what she actually said."

True, I've rarely found what Michelle says coherent, but I suspect that what she's saying is primarily directed at black communities. She could have gone much further and bluntly stated that blacks coddle far too much the criminality and paternal irresponsibility in black males. (I won't call them men.) That's glaringly obvious and different from mostly white schools where ordinary boyishness is attacked as "toxic masculinity."
[EX A]: Identity-attack

[EX Q]: Comment: No Kon, we'll be hearing more of the CONservative drivel if tRump manages to retain the presidency for the next four year.  I hope the Dems flame his backside the way the Republicants did President Obama.
[EX A]:
Non-identity-attack