Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.

Ms. Patkotak, thank you,  excellent article.  The stink from Juneau is worse than an angry skunk. How I hope for a federal grand jury one day to indict some of these legislators along with the oil companies. I don't give a darn if the senate winks and lets the likes of Micciche and Meyer vote.  They can not legitimize such an immoral, corrupt, blatantly obvious betrayal of oath of office and the trust placed in them by the citizens. We need one good Snowden whistleblower who can prove that any Legislator voted in favor of the oil corporations in order to keep his job, receive "donations" for his/her designated cause, or (gasp) direct secret payments similar to what poor Bill Allen did when he was laundering money for the oilies at the Baronoff.  I believe that what they are doing is unconstitutional on it's face. We are literally paying the oil companies to steal our oil. To vote to do so is illegal even if they are not being paid off. Ostracize these scum and call them out by name.
No

Hey.... You got us off topic. This was supposed to be about student loans and garnishing SS.
Yes

This is the garbage that sickens me; not only is she culpable she's beyond an accessory to the fact as he couldn't have carried out his acts without her assistance!  If she was a man they would have had her in there right beside him but there really is sexual preference when it comes to charging women; the law is always lenient and I think that's down right ridiculous!! 

I hope the lawyers take every damn dime because lord knows those kids deserve every freaking Penny and then some for all the years of therapy and medical treatment they're going to need.  I'm so upset I'm close to vomiting over this; how can they not charge her? How do you think those victims feel?  

Law Abiding Citizen much?  Why do our DAs make deals with murderers and rapists :(

Yes