In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

[Q]: Comment: Wether this thin skinned CC community can handle it or not, your comments regarding your uncles situation are disgusting, provided they are true.
[A]: Non-identity-attack


[Q]: Comment: The representatives of the government in power should be in the position, all things being equal, to offer appointments and positions at its disposal as it thinks fit.  If there is a law against it doing so, that law should be abolished.  If a government cannot use patronage appointments in the open to smooth its agenda then it will do so in the shadows.  Of course a government that uses patronage appointments recklessly, putting someone in a position where he/she is in over their head, will sooner or later be recognized as incompetent will have to face the consequences.  Governments should be allowed to act foolishly, essentially against their own long term best interests, in this regard.  That's one of the reasons we have elections; to get rid of foolish, incompetent governments.
[A]: Non-identity-attack


[Q]: Comment: These terror attacks by Islamic nut cases are increasing now that the pause for the election is over. Christmas is a favorite target this time of year by this religion, similar to an attack on a Christmas market in France last Dec.

Less Europeans, especially woman will be out this holiday season with the 1000's of ssexual assaults last Christmas, will be seeing the same thing in NA soon. Even now I see less Christmas ornaments out as it attracts Islamic vandals.
[A]:
Identity-attack