We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

Q: Like I said before, claiming that semi-automatic rifles get a lower level of constitutional protection than handguns because they are less useful for self defense seems absurd from historical point of view.

A: Valid
****
Q: Illegal firearms can be identified and linked to other firearms and to crimes and criminals.

A: Valid
****
Q: However, when a child gets shot with an UZI, for example, people on such websites are much more inclined to coldly ignore it or downplay such a tragedy by saying things like "accidents happen".

A:
Valid
****