In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

Ex Input:
Sentence: Joan made sure to thank Susan for all the help she had given.
 Reason: The 'she' refers to susan because of her previous role as the mother of her children in the video. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

Ex Output:
Wrong


Ex Input:
Sentence: Adam can't leave work here until Bob arrives to replace him. If Bob had  left home for work on time, he would be here by this time.
 Reason: The 'he' refers to bob because bob delayed the arrival of adam by not leaving home early. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

Ex Output:
Correct


Ex Input:
Sentence: I poured water from the bottle into the cup until it was empty.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the bottle because water has been poured our from the cup, it should be empty not full. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

Ex Output:

Correct