In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: threat and non-threat. Threat is a statement that someone will be hurt or harmed, especially if the person does not do something in particular.

Ex Input:
Comment: I hope the lack of full financial planning gives the Trump administrstion the ammo it needs to cancel the FFG, as Cayetano/Princess asked him to do. I hope that huge funding gap will bring reality back into focus. We can talk about the fiasco in terms we can afford or kill it. I prefer killing the beast.

Ex Output:
Threat


Ex Input:
Comment: Vancouver was thinking it was a good idea to pass a law mandating snow tires-  but only if there was snow on the ground? 

How on earth was that law going to be enforced? Who was going to enforce it? How were people going to comply? Check the weather then break out the jack?

Two questions arise in my mind- 

1- Did the author completely miss the actual wording of the proposed law? Because surely a law like that could not have actually been proposed, right? 

2- If the author's research was accurate, it beggars the question: How do people that stupid actually get elected?

Ex Output:
Non-threat


Ex Input:
Comment: Look at the Globe Main page.   Rife with bad news and typical Friday Libéral nip and tuck bad news.     Kathleen Wynne is unavailable to comment because she was busy bribing...oops i mean spending that catbon tax cash grab money before she even collected it.    Ontario is a complete disaster with which way is the wind blowing politicians at the helm.    WOW.

Ex Output:

Non-threat