In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

[Q]: Comment: Prorogue
Harper proroguing Parliament was to stop an UNDEMOCRATIC attempt by the sore losers to form a Coalition to steal the election from the winning Conservatives
.
it was pathetic watching such "democrats" as Chretien and Ed Broadbent trotting up Parliament Hill with that intention
.
Proroguing by Harper is a tool in the Rule Book, so it is not undemocratic at all
[A]: Non-obscene


[Q]: Comment: It’s too bad that Mr. Trump doesn’t have the same international courage on climate change as he does criticizing a foreign mayor from his phone...on the golf course..
And it's too bad that Peyton Manning hangs out with a groper and racist demagogue...
[A]: Non-obscene


[Q]: Comment: Holy shit, Muck! That brought it home for me. Those bastards want civil war! Look at that guy's guns! Peaceful assembly? And now they are headed somewhere else probably picking up a few more of their ilk on the way. Militias!  I am scared for our country. And it's all because of Trump. I believe this next "rally" will involve guns. And Trump condones it because these traitors are his kind of people. Pence and congress just looks on. This is the true republican agenda. There can be no doubt now.
[A]:
Obscene