In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Q: Comment: Allan Ross, you are right to call out the trolls and their determination to remain unaccountable, however, please don't fetishize "rational". It has long been a tool of white straight males to exercise their privileged notions over the rest of us.

A: Non-sexual-explicit
****
Q: Comment: Yeah, I'e been living with this issue for most of my life. I'm happy to keep it alive.

There's no question that men who make sexual overtures from a position of power commit an abuse of power. And yes, it's exactly these blurry lines that become problematic.

When I was quite young (I may even have been a minor) I had a boss who got sexual with me when we were alone in a room. I rebuffed him, and he was a gentleman about it. I was really annoyed, but I continued to work at that job for a while. Was it an abuse of power? Yes. Was it a crime? Actually, legally it may have been. But I don't think of it as a crime. Women used to experience this kind of stuff all the time. I'd like to think the culture has changed a bit since then.

Unfortunately, as you may remember, I have also been a rape victim. So I give women who claim they've been raped the benefit of the doubt. But...at times, it's not the truth.

A: Sexual-explicit
****
Q: Comment: he was a nazi even at 14, and admits he didnt mind what they were doing, , get over it. facts dont change.

KROFT: Went out, in fact, and helped in the confiscation of property from the Jews.

Mr. SOROS: Yes. That’s right. Yes.
KROFT: No feeling of guilt?

Mr. SOROS: No.

A:
Non-sexual-explicit
****