Categorize the comment on the basis of toxicity. If the comment is toxic (harmful, malicious, derogatory, threat, insult, identity attck, etc.) output Yes, otherwise output No.

Whatever the reasons she or her lawyer want to make for the reassignment, moving principles and other administrators around from school to school within the district, is and has been common practice.  Some schools are not the right fit for every principle and the district usually wants to give them a chance at more than one school before making final judgment on performance.  Unfortunately, some good performers who are making big differences at schools get moved around along with the under achievers.
No

Then let's put the gay men on an island and lesbian women on another and after 100 years see if anyone is left, if it is a natural lifestyle!
Yes

Anchorage has had the worst of both worlds; stupid Republicans who thought if they gave the unions stuff, they'd like them, and Democrats who gave the unions stuff because that's what Democrats do.   It is compounded by the fact that after APD left the Teamsters they hooked up with Will Aitcheson, a very accomplished attorney and labor negotiator, and he took the MOA to the cleaners in, IIRC, the early '90s.   The MOA clearly wasn't prepared to deal with skillful advocacy in interest arbitration.   The same thing happened to the State when the Troopers became an independent union in '79.   Nobody with the State had a clue how to deal with interest arbitration and the union handed the State its head.   That happened just before my time and I spent my whole career just trying to hold the line.   I spent the 2nd half of my career telling Troopers that if they wanted what APD had, they needed to go to work for APD.

Yes