In this task, you will be presented with a context from an academic paper and you have to write an answerable question based on the context. Your questions can be extractive, abstractive, or yes-no questions.

The clinical notes we used for the experiment are provided by domain experts, consisting of 1,160 physician logs of Medical ICU admission requests at a tertiary care center affiliated to Mount Sanai. The enriched corpus contains 42,506 Wikipedia articles, each of which corresponds to one candidate, 6 research papers and 2 critical care medicine textbooks, besides our raw ICU data.
Which dataset do they use to build their model?

In this paper, we present an extraction-then-synthesis framework for machine reading comprehension shown in Figure 1 , in which the answer is synthesized from the extraction results. We build an evidence extraction model to predict the most important sub-spans from the passages as evidence, and then develop an answer synthesis model which takes the evidence as additional features along with the question and passage to further elaborate the final answers.
Which framework they propose in this paper?

Baselines We thoroughly compare our approaches to the following baselines:

Direct source$\rightarrow $target: A standard NMT model trained on given source$\rightarrow $target parallel data.

Multilingual: A single, shared NMT model for multiple translation directions BIBREF6.

Many-to-many: Trained for all possible directions among source, target, and pivot languages.

Many-to-one: Trained for only the directions to target language, i.e., source$\rightarrow $target and pivot$\rightarrow $target, which tends to work better than many-to-many systems BIBREF27.

What are multilingual models that were outperformed in performed experiment?