We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Ex Input:
Sent1: so you weigh whatever monetary savings (if any) over the life of someone found innocent after conviction (even if rare)?
 Sent2: After all, the person you're torturing may actually be innocent.

Ex Output:
Not similar


Ex Input:
Sent1: This is why I said what I said in the first place about why I'm against the death penalty.
 Sent2: Though I would not call the death penalty murder, I am personally against it.

Ex Output:
Similar


Ex Input:
Sent1: The death penalty (because of appeals) costs more than solitary confinement for life, both of which would ensure that the person would never kill again.
 Sent2: Can life imprisonment for a definite yes, prevent a murderer from killing again?

Ex Output:

Not similar