In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

[EX Q]: Comment: @wiliki:  Just because the ethics commission said it wasn't unethical doesn't mean that the Mayor taking two hours of vacation every month to go and work at another job during normal business hours where he gets paid almost twice his Mayoral salary isn't unethical.  It just means that the ethics commission was corrupt and agreed to turn a blind eye towards this situation that is clearly unethical.  No other politician in the state of Hawaii or for that matter possibly in the entire United States is in a similar situation.  Even our legislature who's members have private sector jobs when they are not in session don't work both jobs at the same time.  Wiliki, if you had a real job working 40 hours a week and you told your boss that you want to take two hours of vacation time during normal business hours to go and work at another job, do you think your boss would say yes?  I don't think so!  LOL!
[EX A]: Non-sexual-explicit

[EX Q]: Comment: Well, we sure are touchy about "words".  But real action is no big deal, right?  I especially like the comment in the article that Trump's quicker to act to defend Muslims...by sending cruise missiles.  LMAO...uh, you think those babies don't take out humans?  

And, the humans on that base were likely Muslim.  So, we're protecting Muslims by killing Muslims.  Said that way, it's kinda counter-productive, isn't it?
[EX A]: Non-sexual-explicit

[EX Q]: Comment: In the United States they call this "the swanp".   Look at the record of Metrolinx..    A liberal made bloated useless  tax sponge.
[EX A]:
Non-sexual-explicit