In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: threat and non-threat. Threat is a statement that someone will be hurt or harmed, especially if the person does not do something in particular.

Ex Input:
Comment: More personal attacks. A sure sign you're losing the argument. Your excuses are pathetic.

Ex Output:
Non-threat


Ex Input:
Comment: Here we have a protected minority maliciously and publicly mocking another person for their religious beliefs.  Anyone else see the epic hypocrisy in that?   We all know that if the driver was a Muslim imam, JJ would NEVER say anything derogatory about him, in spite of the fact that Islam is radically misogynistic and homophobic.  Scratching my head.

Ex Output:
Non-threat


Ex Input:
Comment: "Here we are again. Just two weeks after the Manchester attack, London is again recovering from terrorism. "
Correction: muslim terrorism. And showing the hijabbed smiling face of the author doesn't make one iota of difference.
The inconvenient truth is, that while certainly there are innocent and peaceful muslims, who preach tolerance and understanding, as a group they are the hotbed of the total opposite.
The divide between the Judeo-Christian West  is growing, not diminishing and the only solution is total separation.

Ex Output:

Non-threat