The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the self-need strategy, otherwise output No. self-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to create a personal need for an item in the negotiation, such as by pointing out that the participant sweats a lot to show preference towards water packages.

Example Input: Context: 'hello how are you' 'i'm good thank you, How are you doing today?' 'I am good, let's plan our camping trips. I am diabetes, so water is very important to me. what about you?'
Utterance: 'I need water too'
Example Output: No

Example Input: Context: 'me too. I don't care about water since we are camping near a river.' 'I would consider giving you all food and water if I could get all of the wood.' 'Oh really? I think I am able to do it without firewood then. The kids will be full and probably won't ask for smores'
Utterance: 'Or 1 wood for you and 2 of food and water?'
Example Output: No

Example Input: Context: 'ah, I'm definitely ok with doing one at a time: A 2:1 split is definitely OK with me: The issue is, if we consider each individually, it might be harder to come to a deal, but I'm happy to do it your way.' 'How about you take 1 firewood, I''l take 2 and with food, you can have 2 and I'll take one package.  I have two very hungry boys!' 'Is there a reason you want the 2:1 split? Food my group's largest priority by a large margin (We eat a lot). It's worth a lot more to my group then the firewood would be.'
Utterance: 'That's why I would like to give you 2 and I will take 1 food.  I have 8 and 10 year old boys.🙂'
Example Output:
No