In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

[Q]: Comment: Do you want your streets plowed or your police department stopped from having sex with prostitutes?  You can't have both unless we raise more income through taxes.
[A]: Sexual-explicit


[Q]: Comment: Yeah, I'e been living with this issue for most of my life. I'm happy to keep it alive.

There's no question that men who make sexual overtures from a position of power commit an abuse of power. And yes, it's exactly these blurry lines that become problematic.

When I was quite young (I may even have been a minor) I had a boss who got sexual with me when we were alone in a room. I rebuffed him, and he was a gentleman about it. I was really annoyed, but I continued to work at that job for a while. Was it an abuse of power? Yes. Was it a crime? Actually, legally it may have been. But I don't think of it as a crime. Women used to experience this kind of stuff all the time. I'd like to think the culture has changed a bit since then.

Unfortunately, as you may remember, I have also been a rape victim. So I give women who claim they've been raped the benefit of the doubt. But...at times, it's not the truth.
[A]: Sexual-explicit


[Q]: Comment: It is no longer shocking that a priest/bishop who facilitates the raping of children by priests and bishops would be accused of sexual abuse. Is there a difference between priests/bishops who rape children and priests/bishops who remain silent or pass them around? And this particular bishop is a hit and run bishop who left a man dead on the side of the road. Bishop Thomas should be counting his lucky stars that he's escaped prison thus far. 

AW
[A]:
Sexual-explicit