In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: toxic and non-toxic. Toxicity is defiend as anything that is rude, disrespectful, or unreasonable that would make someone want to leave a converation.

Example Input: Comment: There are lots of great thinkers and ideas that come out of the US, as well as probably more from self-serving ideologues that have found success in one way or another and subsequently consider themselves wise in all ways of the world. It would be nice to limit penetration of the latter while easing that of the former, but I think we all know which is in the ascendant these days all over the place.
Example Output: Non-toxic

Example Input: Comment: I hope those rigid young people that like the Traditional Latin Mass will be listened to.
Example Output: Non-toxic

Example Input: Comment: One of the most interesting things about Ms Yousafzai is the way in which she balances her strong belief in education and gender equality with her equally strong Muslim faith. It's a delicate balance which generally isn't explored too deeply here in the West for fear of raising uncomfortable discussions regarding the reform of Islam and its ties to political realities. 

Ms Yousafzai argues that gender equality and commitment to universal education are not incompatible with Islam and that reform is best served as a movement from within Islam itself based upon Islamic teaching, that advancement for women within Islam is more about reclamation than reformation , while others such as Ayaan Hirsi Ali see equality as an outgrowth of Islamic reform as emanating from outside the faith, forcing change...,

it's an important question, generally too problematic for western media and politicians, who prefer to view Ms Yousafzai for the most part through a lens focused only upon gender equality.
Example Output:
Non-toxic