In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence can be inferred from the statement. Incorrect choices change the meaning in important ways or have details that are not mentioned in the statement. Indicate your answer as 1,2, or 3 corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.

[Q]: Statement: Now--the Sather Karf told you what you were to do, of course, but--"  "Wait a minute," Dave suggested. Choices:  1. Now, simply do as you were told by the Sather Karf. 2. The Sather Karf did not tell you what you were to do, intentionally. 3. Now, the Sather Karf explained you tasks, of course...
[A]: 3


[Q]: Statement: Nor is Clinton's blend of realism and idealism necessarily corrupt. Choices:  1. Clinton's blend of realism and idealism is extremely corrupt. 2. The blend of realism and idealism portrayed by Clinton should be punished. 3. Clinton's blend of realism and idealism is fair.
[A]: 3


[Q]: Statement: The Erlenborn Commission was authorized by a resolution of the Corporation's Board of Directors on November 16, 1998, to study the presence requirement in the Corporation's statutory restriction on the representation of eligible aliens. Choices:  1. The Board of Directors authorized the resolution. 2. The Board of Directors denied the resolution authorization. 3. The Board of Directors authorized the the resolution unanimously.
[A]:
1