In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

[Q]: Comment: But where was Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton and the entire liberal "progressive" Establishment during Obama's eight years in the White House? Busy waging wars in various Islamic countries and quietly sending killer drones to kill Muslims in countries all over the Middle East and North Africa.
  Not only did they do nothing to decrease racism, Obama's soaring anti-racism rhetoric ended the day he became president and devoted all his power to bailing out Wall Street while abandoning Main Street.
[A]: Non-sexual-explicit


[Q]: Comment: If the Democrats had any brains they would never "block" a Supreme Court nominee just based on ideology.  If they are not qualified that is one thing but if they are not a left winger that is nonsense.  Maybe the Republicans should then block any leftie from the court who is otherwise qualified.  This kind of stuff is what ruins our entire system and makes people not trust it at all.  We want good judges who are not buried in ideology but can rule on the facts and the law.  How hard is that?  Often, it is much easier than checking a potential ruling against a certain ideology.  Try it!
[A]: Non-sexual-explicit


[Q]: Comment: Michael Brooks' most obnoxious line is that gays don't have sex, they have sodomy.  So does anyone who does good foreplay. Pederasty is patterned behavior which is ingrained by rape. Gays self identify when still virginal.  Half the clergy is gay and the other half is asexual.  It is the asexuals that have made Catholic sexual teaching irrelevant.
[A]:
Sexual-explicit