In this task, you're given two sentences. Indicate if the first sentence clearly entails the second sentence (i.e., one can conclude the 2nd sentence by reading the 1st one). Indicate your answer with '1' if the first sentence entails the second sentence, otherwise answer with '0'.

Ex Input:
Sentence 1: Professional computer hackers from the secret services were brought into attempt to hack into the Government's internal secure communicationssystem, which was launched today. Sentence 2: Non-authorized personnel illegally entered into computer networks.

Ex Output:
0


Ex Input:
Sentence 1: This explanation was rejected by the Government of Chile, who insist that Pinochet enjoys diplomatic immunity in his capacity as "an elected member in the Senate for life" since leaving the command of the armed forces last March. Sentence 2: The Chilean government affirming that as a member of the Senate, Pinochet has diplomatic immunity.

Ex Output:
1


Ex Input:
Sentence 1: PARIS — Julius Meinl V, the scion of a Viennese business dynasty whose name has been synonymous since the days of the Hapsburgs with luxuries like exotic coffee, handmade tortes and discreet private banking, has been jailed on suspicion of fraud at a company linked to the family. Prosecutors accused Mr. Meinl of artificially bolstering shares of the real estate company Meinl European Land on the Vienna stock exchange, even as its investments in real estate across Eastern and Central Europe cratered. Sentence 2: Julius Meinl V is the chairman of Austria's closely-held Meinl Bank.

Ex Output:

0