TASK DEFINITION: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.
PROBLEM: Context: 'Most needed is both food and water. I guess food is my highest priority .🙂' 'Ok perfect, the item I need the most is water because I need to hydrate.  What do you think if I give you 2 food and I keep 2 of water. ' 'Ii understand , the problem  is ctheere is 3 of us. What if  we have 2 food and 2 water and you have 2 firewood ?🙂'
Utterance: 'The object I need the most is WATER, so I cannot give you 2, I am giving you 2 FOOD since it is what you most need. Remember that we must both be satisfied for this to work🙂'

SOLUTION: No

PROBLEM: Context: 'Hey how's it going'
Utterance: 'Good, looking forward to my camping trip.'

SOLUTION: No

PROBLEM: Context: 'ah, I'm definitely ok with doing one at a time: A 2:1 split is definitely OK with me: The issue is, if we consider each individually, it might be harder to come to a deal, but I'm happy to do it your way.' 'How about you take 1 firewood, I''l take 2 and with food, you can have 2 and I'll take one package.  I have two very hungry boys!' 'Is there a reason you want the 2:1 split? Food my group's largest priority by a large margin (We eat a lot). It's worth a lot more to my group then the firewood would be.'
Utterance: 'That's why I would like to give you 2 and I will take 1 food.  I have 8 and 10 year old boys.🙂'

SOLUTION:
Yes