In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.
--------
Question: Sentence: I put the heavy book on the table and it broke.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the table because Book to heavy for the table. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

Answer: Correct


Question: Sentence: The sun was covered by a thick cloud all morning, but luckily, by the time the picnic started, it was out.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the sun because the sun is the thing being covered, so "it" is out when it is no longer covered. The cloud can't cover itself. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

Answer: Correct


Question: Sentence: As Ollie carried Tommy up the long winding steps, his legs dangled.
 Reason: The 'his' refers to tommy because Ollie is a boy, and Tommy is a boy, and the 'him' is probably. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

Answer:
Wrong