The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the self-need strategy, otherwise output No. self-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to create a personal need for an item in the negotiation, such as by pointing out that the participant sweats a lot to show preference towards water packages.

Context: 'I think they went to Chicago.  I really needing replace our lost water and sleeping bags.  I see there are some extra supplies to share.  I could really use the water and firwood.  🙂' 'oh yeah, you definitely do. we have all of our stuff and mostly wanted to hike and have picnics during our camping trip ' 'Great. If you mainly doing picnics do you want 3 Food?   I could use the the supplies.  🙂'
Utterance: 'Sure, I'll take 3 food and 1 water would be nice. you can have 2 waters and all of the firewood '
Yes

Context: 'How many wood do you think you need?' 'I would like 2 of the firewood. What do you think? ' 'I don't need wood as I am usually warm so I think we can work out a deal. I like to have more water and I usually get thirsty.'
Utterance: 'That sounds good to me. 🙂 I think we can make a good deal.'
No

Context: 'I can trade more food but I need a bit more water.  ' 'I do need the water as well, I can  trade more firewood.' 'No I want need at least two packages of water.  I can give you two packages of food and all my firewood.'
Utterance: 'Sorr I can give you 1 water only or I would not have enough for myself. '

Yes