Categorize the comment on the basis of toxicity. If the comment is toxic (harmful, malicious, derogatory, threat, insult, identity attck, etc.) output Yes, otherwise output No.
--------
Question: Arun makes a number of good points and offers a perspective that undermines the demagogues of the right. The right loves simple easy answers to complex problems.  They miss their responsibility for creating the conditions that make for a rich soup of angry people who don't see any way out.  Of course we all know that the Iraqi war was the worst response, particular how the first six months were handled. Bush's team was arrogant. Blackwater was arrogant.  Debathification was stupid, and arrogant.  They left stock piles of bombs around Bagdad that slowly dissolved to become IEDs. And throughout this the words of support for Islam were undermined by the radical right.  And it's gotten worse, much worse as Fox and team rally their troops to undermine considered actions that could both reduce the hatred and tension and increase our ability to deal with extremists on both ends...great insights!

Answer: Yes


Question: I find it ironic Andre that you asked for my discretion when you were worried that making public the concerns you shared with me would have an adverse impact on your potential employment situation several years ago. Remember? Hypocrite much? And despite the widely acknowledged successes electorally and policy wise of the AFL during my tenure you have taken multiple occasions to say how dumb and unreasonable I've been. Please be specific.

Answer: Yes


Question: Couple lessons:  any and everyone makes mistakes.  Getting involved with heroin is a death sentence. I hope my daughter avoids that mistake.   It's lethal.  And, whoever gets involved with it, it's their own fault.  Two:  what in the hell were the jail decision makers thinking?  Coughing up blood and solitary?  And why only $100,000?  This seems like a multi-million dollar lawsuit.  They killed that girl.

Answer:
No