We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

Q: There is no reason law-abiding citizens need to defend themselves as they are untrained, do not have full knowledge of the law and eventually cause more harm than good by owning such weapons.

A: Valid
****
Q: A lot of the most popular laws (unconstitutional in my estimation from many court cases) were examined by the CDC and NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCE and found no benefit IN ANY OF THE CURRENT ILLEGAL GUN REGULATION/BAN LAWS.

A: Valid
****
Q: In my opinion there's absolutely nothing reasonable about banning the sale of firearms with simple cosmetic features, declaring that only the rich and wealthy can own guns, and that rationing the exercising of a constitutional right.

A:
Valid
****