In this task, you're given a statement, and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence clearly disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3' corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.

Ex Input:
Statement: It is time to revisit and update the Clean Air Act once again in order to achieve the additional reductions needed to address public health and environmental problems in the most cost effective manner. Choices:  1. The Clean Air Act does not require any updates at this time. 2. The Clean Air Act does not currently address environmental problems in the most optimal way. 3. The Clean Air Act would be improved by reducing carbon emission limits on motorcycles.

Ex Output:
1


Ex Input:
Statement: The all-hours hubbub here is infectious. Choices:  1. The hubbub that goes on for hours is injurious. 2. The hubbub that goes on for hours is infectious because the people are enjoying their merry-making. 3. The hubbub that goes on for hours is infectious.

Ex Output:
1


Ex Input:
Statement: Arranged in a descending spiral around it are other tanks representing the denizens of the Pacific Ocean's seismic ring of fire.  Choices:  1. The fish who inhabit the ring of fire have developed a tolerance for heat. 2. Japan's proximity to the ring of fire means that it rarely experiences earthquakes. 3. The ring of fire refers to volcanic activity.

Ex Output:

2