We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

Example Input: I wouldn't mind it as much if there was a law that required some level of training for guns to be purchased, so we know that whoever buys these will no how to defend themselves.
Example Output: Valid

Example Input: Although a federal ballistic fingerprint law may be more effective than a patchwork of state systems, the costs of creating, maintaining, and using a federal system are likely to be substantial.
Example Output: Valid

Example Input: i wouldn't want to get shot with anything waring onr of those, they are only for fragments, not bullets, also the hand gun is not the worry, rifles with small rounds will defete a vest easly.
Example Output:
Valid