In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence can be inferred from the statement. Incorrect choices change the meaning in important ways or have details that are not mentioned in the statement. Indicate your answer as 1,2, or 3 corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.

Input: Consider Input: Statement: Nor is Clinton's blend of realism and idealism necessarily corrupt. Choices:  1. Clinton's blend of realism and idealism is extremely corrupt. 2. The blend of realism and idealism portrayed by Clinton should be punished. 3. Clinton's blend of realism and idealism is fair.

Output: 3


Input: Consider Input: Statement: oh oh yeah yeah i never really noticed how effective they were but um because that wasn't really i i bought them and i didn't really get to use them like oh there's mosquitoes let's turn them we just sort of lit them Choices:  1. They worked great on the mosquitoes.  2. They were convenient to use. 3. I'm not sure if they worked but we use them.

Output: 3


Input: Consider Input: Statement: A tough call, since no shoe company with a big-name hoops line is wholly without blame. Choices:  1. Most companies affiliated with a big-name hoops line have dirty hands.   2. Most of the participants are innocent in their dealings.  3. There is not a one that is innocent. 


Output: 1