instruction:
You are given a review of Amazon's food products. Your task is to divide them into two classes: negative or positive, depending on the content of the review.
question:
Shake N Bake is one of those products that has a limited market. While I like the crunch factor, it can be hard to keep the chicken from getting soggy on the bottom. It's really a glorified breading which is about as easy to make as boiling water. If you like it fine, but for me I'd rather make a dish from scratch.
answer:
Negative


question:
I have to admit based on most of the reviews I was sold on getting the 48 pack.  Was a mistake. All three flavors had a distinct taste of the sucralose.  That is the name of the artificial sweetner, in the product.  If you like Splenda,you may like this.  But, it has a distinct taste. Unfortunately not for me. A few friends of mine that tried it and said,"It wasn't bad." Unfortunately, that was the best of the comments. If you really want a good cup of hot chocolate try Cafe Escapes or Swiss Miss.  Both are twice as good in my opinion. Liked the Escapes best.  Wish I liked the artificial sweetner, but the that taste has a distinct after taste. Probably would be better without the artificial stuff and more regular sugar. If your going to order I would get the small pack to try it.  Better then throwing out 30.  Try Cafe Escapes and Swiss Miss and see for yourself.
answer:
Negative


question:
We purchased this syrup for making popsicles (fresh fruit and very little sweetener) some time ago based on what we now have discovered to be crap science and misleading advertising.  We normally are very strict in our choice of foods and nutrition and are members of a group who spearheaded the research on trans fats (partially hydrogenated oils) forcing the FDA's hand for trans fat labeling.  That group, a good source of easily understood food science, and nutrition is The Weston A. Price Foundation.  I've just completed some research on their site, and others, and discovered some disturbing facts about this so called agave nectar.  It has a quite dark history.  Type "agave" into their search engine and you'll find a number of articles/reports.  You might also try a general internet search engine and do the same.  If you are concerned about your health, may I suggest you do this research and get the facts about this man made, very high fructose syrup?  I believe it is better to have all the information available to weigh against the agave industry's partial truths.  One article even suggests that current agave syrup labeling does not conform to FDA requirements.  The consensus of non-vested conscientious science is that agave syrup is another bad guy.  The power of the advertising dollar is really something isn't it?  We're going back to real maple syrup (NOT any of the "original" artificially flavored high fructose corn syrup syrups).
answer:

Negative