Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.

Input: Consider Input: I don't see a problem with the six month sentence if he serves it in maximum security general population at San Quentin.

Output: No


Input: Consider Input: The protestors Facebook page comments are more or less the same: publicly: "here's an open letter, let's have a dialogue, while behind the scenes on Facebook: "fuck these guys, let's shut em down."

But calling attention to that would be fanning the flames - it's pretty disingenuous all around. Let's admit, no one REALLY wants to have a conversation here, do they?

Output: Yes


Input: Consider Input: I don't like the label "hawk" since it is used with a negative connotation.  I believe that Rep. Gabbard is a realist.  She understands that our regime change wars have been a total disaster but is also willing to admit the truth about the things that are true threats.  She "gets" ISIS, As-Qaeda, and other "Islamists" or "Jihadists" (both distinct from ordinary Muslims) and the danger they present not only to the West, but also to their fellow Muslims in the Middle East and Africa.  How many people have to be killed by ISIS, Boko Haram, Hamas, Hezbollah, Al-Qaeda, Al-Nusra, and others before the Western left accepts reality?  Tulsi gets it and for that I am grateful.


Output: No