In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Comment: Remember the modern left and the neo-cons don't do logic. It is all about how they feel.

-

Doug Saunder and Robyn Doolittle are the same as the anti-vaxxer's. They are pushing theories that have been disproven decades ago.
Non-obscene

Comment: Why should anybody believe anything you say.  You just crap all over the place...stinks like hell!
Obscene

Comment: This explains why your preferred go-to rebuttal is to incontinence; you're speaking from experience. TMI alert.

On to debunking your "argument," such as it is: Of the 10 most populous states, Clinton carried two. Of the 10 fastest growing states, Clinton also carried two. She did the best in the two largest wealth-generating states, and just as predictably in several others. The reviled 1%, by Wall Street's next-day reaction, shrugged and shook its wealth-generating head.

But could you tell me more about modern urban societies?

The political problem is easily solved: Don't underestimate your opponent, especially a buffoon. Don't take echo-chamber polls as gospel. Show up where you want your voters to show up. Wisconsin, for instance. Michigan, perhaps.

Obama won 37 counties and Iowa in 2012. Clinton won six and lost. Apparently, there's more clout in those bib overalls than you understand. Pay attention.

Conclusion: You're better at flicking insults. Less cleanup.

Non-obscene