In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Example Input: Comment: It's equally ludicrous my friend.  I intended say there is more than one behavior that causes addiction and prescription drugs are every bit as likely to destroy families.   The city wants to chose their 'bad' behavior to tax.  It's not a fair tax it's a sin tax.  I ask again why chose marijuana users?
Example Output: Non-sexual-explicit

Example Input: Comment: Chuckie Schmuck at it again. Another of HiLIARy's playmates can't handle the truth. Born loser
Example Output: Non-sexual-explicit

Example Input: Comment: This is extremely pervy, but doesn't being a "sex offender" for this action sort of lessen the impact of the term when describing those that actually, you know, rape? Or those that molest children?


Strikes me there should be some levels to this term "sex offender" if it's not to lose all meaning. In some states, peeing outside could have you classified as same, which is beyond ridiculous. There are other, similarly ridiculous ways one can get classified a "sex offender". 



Maybe a ranking of sex offender class 1 to class 10 or something. If rape is a 10, and peeing outside were a 1 (without a minor present), I wonder where this might fall. The woman obviously had to be skeeved out, and has her person violated in a clear way, but I doubt even she would rank it a 10?
Example Output:
Sexual-explicit