Given a paragraph about movies and a set of conversational questions and answers about the paragraph, say whether the passage contains sufficient information to answer the follow-up question. Say Yes if it is answerable; otherwise, say No. The paragraph has the prefix 'CONTEXT:'. Each conversation question has a prefix `Q:` followed by the answer prefix `A:`, and the follow-up question has a prefix `FOLLOWUP_Q:`.

Example Input: CONTEXT: Well no. The Genie was freed. Therefore he had no more obligation to grant the wishes, regardless of whether Aladdin had any wishes left. If we are going to count the wishes though, the movie does count the saving from drowning as the second wish making freeing the Genie the third. This would have made the Nile wish pointless either way, since either the Genie was free to deny the wish as he was free, or he was free to deny it because it would have been the fourth wish.  <sep>  Q: Does the Genie trick Aladdin with the third wish? A: Well no. The Genie was freed  Q: Does the Genie trick Aladdin into using his real last wish? A: he had no more obligation to grant the wishes, regardless of whether Aladdin had any wishes left  Q: How many wishes did Aladin receive? A: If we are going to count the wishes though, the movie does count the saving from drowning as the second wish making freeing the Genie the third  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: What about when Alladin tricks the Genie into getting him and Abu out of the cave where they are trapped?
Example Output: Yes

Example Input: CONTEXT: They usually got all their reading and practice material from the supply store (spell books, candles etc.). So its safe to assume they are not natural witches but acquired powers through learning and studying witchcraft. I think it had more to do with the reading and practice of witchcraft and firm belief that it works.  <sep>  Q: Where do the powers come from? A: acquired powers through learning and studying witchcraft  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Are their power's as strong as Sarah's?
Example Output: No

Example Input: CONTEXT: I think the key is the line "He could've gone for general, but he went for himself instead." Kurtz had apparently lost interest in climbing higher in the military ranks, which presumably would have taken him away from combat and the front lines. He seemed to want to go in the opposite direction -- toward the heat of the fight -- so Kurtz requested Airborne training as a first step toward returning to combat. Kurtz took himself out of the running for promotion by enrolling in Airborne training. Promotion would have required continuing to follow an advancing career path -- whereas Kurtz brought his career advancement to a halt by enrolling in Airborne training.  <sep>  Q: What was the significance of Kurtz joining airborne A: Kurtz took himself out of the running for promotion by enrolling in Airborne training  Q: Why did he not want a promotion? A: Kurtz had apparently lost interest in climbing higher in the military ranks, which presumably would have taken him away from combat and the front lines  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Did Kurtz want to stay in the fight rather than get a higher rank?
Example Output:
Yes