Categorize the comment on the basis of severe toxicity. If the comment is severely toxic output Yes, otherwise output No.

[Q]: Government could start by closing the border with Mexico, where the majority of drugs come through. Then, instead of jailing dealers, we hang them and that includes the illegal aliens hiding in sanctuary cities. The only way to get results, is to stop voting for liberals, who are destroying this country. Liberals want open borders, knowing that drug dealers, human traffickers, diseased, ignorant, unlawful people are coming in. They spend more on illegals, then they do taking care of Americans. This all needs to stop! Our liberal President, is releasing known drug dealers, does not enforce laws, therefore we have right now, a President not doing his job.
[A]: Yes


[Q]: here's something i have already learned...idiot savants like ben carson may have advanced degrees and be able to write books, but when they start spouting off about their invisible friend in the sky, they reveal themselves as utterly delusional and, if not certifiably insane, certainly borderline insane.
      
that includes you, minnery, with your 'just like billy graham' howler of a revelation.  
(there is something seriously creepy here, but that's another story).
  
look, drop the pretenses.  

this is a political con gussied up in the rags of dominionist theology.
  
the people who drop $35 - $100 in the coffers either don't know that or they are pretending that they don't know in order to have these hucksters advance their political views.

how does any of this con job comfort the truly afflicted and the downtrodden?

and yes, i do know that ben carson and ben chavis are different people.

dollars to doughnuts plenty of the attendees don't know that.
[A]: Yes


[Q]: As an NAV I can speak only for myself.   If a candidate made this comment:  

"If Republicans focus on what government should be doing, which governments should be doing it, and how to do it effectively and efficiently, voters will listen and the Republican brand will become more appealing."

I would consider them seriously.    

It's a theme that I've tried to promote for about a decade now.   Any stable nation state has a strong government structure - no government is not an option.   But the US is a very large and diverse nation, and federal programs that don't acknowledge local input and control, will struggle.   Asking what level of government should address public concerns is a fair question and will lead to higher levels of commitment.      Funding is another topic, especially for local or state economies that have low resources.
[A]:
No