In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence can be inferred from the statement. Incorrect choices change the meaning in important ways or have details that are not mentioned in the statement. Indicate your answer as 1,2, or 3 corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.

Input: Consider Input: Statement: When you hear that despite the fact that he has economists who know better, the Justice Department's Joel Klein apparently either believes or chooses to claim that this case is about path dependence, you start to wonder. Choices:  1. Joel Klein is lying about the case, and it's obvious why. 2. Joel Klein's claim that the case is about path dependence is fully backed up by his economists. 3. Joel Klein says that this case is about path dependence, even though the economists who work for him know that isn't true.

Output: 3


Input: Consider Input: Statement: The lion, symbol of power and pride, was an understandable choice as the emblem of India's regained nationhood in 1947. Choices:  1. The symbol of pride for India is a caterpillar. 2. The symbol of pride could be a line can be seen as an understandable choice for India's regained nationhood in 1947. 3. It is quite understandable why the lion is established as India's regained nationhood in 1947.

Output: 3


Input: Consider Input: Statement: now they now they have an internal problem themselves right now and i think that has to do with them having problems with food and and and and prices and all of that stuff Choices:  1. They have problems currently because of high prices. 2. The have no issue with the price of food. 3. They have problems currently because of high prices caused by the war.


Output: 1