In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: threat and non-threat. Threat is a statement that someone will be hurt or harmed, especially if the person does not do something in particular.

Example Input: Comment: Someone should stomp her face into a puddle of mush....
Example Output: Threat

Example Input: Comment: Definitely NOT.  Besides your ignorantly equating Christianity and Islam as being equivalent or the same when they are not, one, people indulging in their private sexual predilections, that does nothing but give them cheap thrills, is not the same as religion,  particularly Christianity which is the foundation of civilization in Europe and the United States. Comparing what people do with their wing ding or other body crevices with Christianity is highly asinine.  Two, there is no civil right to engage in any sexual behavior you want to engage in, based on nothing but just because you feel like it.  Necrophilia, pedophilia and bestiality must be allowed also based on that.

But why the cherry picked hatred of Christianity and Islam?  Buddhism and Hinduism are ok, but Christianity and Islam are not?   Based on what do you make that distinction?  Is that based solely upon whether some let you do whatever you feel like doing and some don't?  That would be a myopic, self absorbed basis.
Example Output: Non-threat

Example Input: Comment: I've been one of his supporters that really wanted him to be given the shot to start this year and see if he'd rise to the next level like it seemed like he might.  Instead, he's really regressed the last 3 games.  I'm now ready to say it's time to give up on thinking he may be anything more than a stop-gap starter until we can find a true starter.

But with as bad as this OL remains, it probably wouldn't matter much even if we did have a true starter at QB.  We'd just get him killed anyway.
Example Output:
Threat