In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

[EX Q]: Comment: That is 100 % an impossibility. If you are pro life and vote and support candidates and a party that advocates full term and late term abortion at will then you cannot under any circumstance be pro life.

You have to look at where the candidates stand. Hillary wants us to be required to provide and pay for abortions and abortive medicines. She stated flat out in the debate she supports full term partial birth murder. HOW can ANY Catholic support her. Then there are the e - mails where she, through her campaign, states how "backwards" we are and advocates groups to sping to action when they can incite a "Catholic Spring." SHE will use law and the courts to mandate the marrying of homosexuals and the providing of abortion procedures. No Catholic can vote for her.
[EX A]: Non-sexual-explicit

[EX Q]: Comment: Correct...the names on these indictments will be Obama, Hillary Clinton, Bill Clinton, Loretta Lynch, John Podesta, Robby Mook, Huma Abedin and the rest of corrupt donkeys or obstruction of justice and Hillary's home server.
[EX A]: Non-sexual-explicit

[EX Q]: Comment: Is this a joke.... ha! Ha! Ha!.... what a bunch of softies. Be sure to "Never Forget Benghazi " like the old hag hillary did!!!!
[EX A]:
Non-sexual-explicit