We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

Ex Input:
You can debate that without guns there would be more deaths to other weapons although you can't debate it would be to the same extent as gun murders and crimes would be.

Ex Output:
Valid


Ex Input:
However when a militia group makes the news, these same anti-gunners are quick to paint them as dangerous, anti-government, and even racist extremists, and an example of why gun control needs to be further tightened.

Ex Output:
Valid


Ex Input:
Do you believe,after all you have said demeaning the 2A, Constitution and self-defense, that you should be allowed to purchase and use a gun in times of civil unrest or an attack on your home and family?

Ex Output:

Valid