We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

[EX Q]: Sent1: Which would be worthless because you could just repeal that amendment and then repeal the 2nd.
 Sent2: If you repealed the 2nd amendment or any "incorporated" amendment than that amendment would no longer be law thus not "incorporated" (obviously since there is nothing to incorporate).
[EX A]: Similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: What you've been doing isn't a debate about gun control, it's criticism of the Supreme Court for saying the Second Amendment protects an individual right to own a gun for legal purposes.
 Sent2: You're right that gun control isn't about guns, however, but 'control' is a secondary matter, a means to an end.
[EX A]: Not similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: Once we disarm law abiding citizens, the only armed civilians around will be criminals who would never willingly give up their weapons.
 Sent2: Law abiding citizens are not going to misuse their firearms and those with criminal records are already banned from owning guns.
[EX A]:
Not similar