In this task, you are given the abstract of a research paper. Your task is to generate a summary of this abstract. Your summary should not be very short, but it's better if it's not more than 30 words.

[Q]: We study the use of the Wave-U-Net architecture for speech enhancement, a model introduced by Stoller et al for the separation of music vocals and accompaniment.   This end-to-end learning method for audio source separation operates directly in the time domain, permitting the integrated modelling of phase information and being able to take large  temporal contexts into account.   Our experiments show that the proposed method improves several metrics, namely PESQ, CSIG, CBAK, COVL and SSNR, over the  state-of-the-art with respect to the speech enhancement task on the Voice Bank corpus (VCTK) dataset. We find that a reduced number of hidden layers is sufficient for speech enhancement in comparison to the original system designed for singing voice separation in music. We see this initial result as an encouraging signal to further explore speech enhancement in the time-domain, both as an end in itself and as a pre-processing step to speech recognition systems.
[A]: The Wave-U-Net architecture, recently introduced by Stoller et al for music source separation, is highly effective for speech enhancement, beating the state of the art.


[Q]: We present Optimal Transport GAN (OT-GAN), a variant of generative adversarial nets minimizing a new metric measuring the distance between the generator distribution and the data distribution. This metric, which we call mini-batch energy distance, combines optimal transport in primal form with an energy distance defined in an adversarially learned feature space, resulting in a highly discriminative distance function with unbiased mini-batch gradients. Experimentally we show OT-GAN to be highly stable when trained with large mini-batches, and we present state-of-the-art results on several popular benchmark problems for image generation.
[A]: An extension of GANs combining optimal transport in primal form with an energy distance defined in an adversarially learned feature space.


[Q]: Textual entailment (or NLI) data has proven useful as pretraining data for tasks requiring language understanding, even when building on an already-pretrained model like RoBERTa. The standard protocol for collecting NLI was not designed for the creation of pretraining data, and it is likely far from ideal for this purpose. With this application in mind we propose four alternative protocols, each aimed at improving either the ease with which annotators can produce sound training examples or the quality and diversity of those examples. Using these alternatives and a simple MNLIbased baseline, we collect and compare five new 9k-example training sets. Our primary results are largely negative, with none of these new methods showing major improvements in transfer learning. However, we make several observations that should inform future work on NLI data, such as that the use of automatically provided seed sentences for inspiration improves the quality of the resulting data on most measures, and all of the interventions we investigated dramatically reduce previously observed issues with annotation artifacts.
[A]:
We propose four new ways of collecting NLI data. Some help slightly as pretraining data, all help reduce annotation artifacts.