In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: insult and non-insult. Insult is any lanugage or act that is disrespectful or scornfully abusive.

Ex Input:
Comment: What an idiot crook.
He'll make a fine democrat politician.

Ex Output:
Insult


Ex Input:
Comment: Ok Mark, it's time for you to resurface your guff now there's a break in our colder than usual winter. Too bad for your pitch that Dr John Bates, a top NOAA scientist with an impeccable reputation has revealed that NOAA falsified data before the Paris accord. Quick team, muzzle that scientist!

Ex Output:
Non-insult


Ex Input:
Comment: Considering there usually are shady doings in some places, Carville's statement is hardly a shocking revelation. Things like the electricity mysteriously going out in some precincts, buses oddly not showing up -- that kind of nickel-and-dime stuff is typical.

But those things are usually isolated incidents that happen at the local level, perpetrated by operatives from both parties, and most serious election watchers think they tend to cancel each other out in the great scheme of things.

It's all old news, but if you want to treat James Carville's comment like it's some major scoop, go right ahead.

Ex Output:

Non-insult