Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.

[EX Q]: I have been chased around my car by a young moose that neighbor kids had been feeding through a window. Don't feed wild animals, because someone else may have to pay for it. Or they will be shot by guys itching to use their guns.
[EX A]: Yes

[EX Q]: And how does corporate welfare we are all paying for, in a global economy suit your careful sensibility? The narrow focus of one aspect of manipulation of so much that is interconnected, shows how you could move elsewhere, yet still manage to complain about indigenous land ownership in perpetuity.

They had all that before the European industrial revolution allowed them to steal with impunity. And treaty upon treaty was supposed to allow them to recover from that loss; yet the indigenous peoples were repeatedly put into a smaller holding cell & given less rations than previously.

You are on stolen property & yet would seek to stand 'your' ground there? ;)
[EX A]: No

[EX Q]: Most of the labor agreements require a specific feasibility study before any move to privatize a function.   That said, they're only doing it because the Legislature told them to and they'll cook the books if necessary.   There is no way this union-owned Administration is going to privatize any union work.   And for the record, I don't favor ANY privatization of police or ministerial powers of government.
[EX A]:
No