instruction:
In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.
question:
Comment: Such is the ways in which we have decided as a society as to how we we deal with misfits; those who march to the beat of another drum; those we can "put away" for not following the "norms" that have been established; those who are annoyingly bothersome; those who can't follow the rules; those with some find of deficiencies deemed difficult to handle, etc.  Do we consider these means to be the most effective and successful ways in dealing with these "problems"?  Sure doesn't seem like it, but, we seem to go on our merry way heading in this direction.  How come?
answer:
Non-identity-attack


question:
Comment: Oh, those 'naughty' BC Liberals! First, Christy shrugs and says, "The BC voters don't care corrupt we are.", then disappears until the whole thing blows over (she hopes). Then her deputy crime boss, Rich Coleman comes out and throws their donors under the bus. If that wasn't bad enough, Suzanne Anton, Attorney General, stands up in QP and throws their lobbyists under the bus.  Who's next?
answer:
Non-identity-attack


question:
Comment: Just shows that 42% of white women can be as ignorant, racist, misogynistic, and hateful as white men. You have a respectometer? For what, the rapture?
answer:

Identity-attack