In this task, you're given a statement, and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence clearly disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3' corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.

Q: Statement: Left to decide what part of the 1996 Act to strike as invalid, the court concluded that congressional intent regarding severability was unclear. Choices:  1. It was decided that the intent of severability was quite clear. 2. As a result, the court left the 1996 Act as it was originally written. 3. The court was able to decide which parts, if any, of the 1996 Act were invalid.

A: 1
****
Q: Statement: The objective is to keep the won from falling much more than is necessary for the long-run adjustment of the Korean economy, and thereby to prevent unnecessary bankruptcies and unnecessary depression of Korean income and employment. Choices:  1. Dropping the won as low as possible in value is the goal.  2. Preventing bankruptcies and depression in the Korean economy is the goal of keeping the won from falling.  3. Keeping the won from falling involves influencing banks and financiers through government agencies. 

A: 1
****
Q: Statement: The general contract approach assumes that the owner contracts individually for all engineering and construction services required to acquire a facility. Choices:  1. The contract makes the owner liable 2. The general contract assumes nothing 3. The general approach assumes the owner pays individually for all engineering and building services 

A:
2
****