We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Example Input: Sent1: If we sentence someone to life in prison, we can always free them at a later time if they are found to be innocent.
 Sent2: When a person does something horrible, we no longer see them as a human that values their life, we just see them as an epitome of hate.
Example Output: Not similar

Example Input: Sent1: maybe we should start with what crimes warrant the death penalty.
 Sent2: And it seems that every time we start talking about the death penalty, that we end up talking about whether or not it deters crime.
Example Output: Not similar

Example Input: Sent1: While criminal trials not involving the death penalty can also involve mistakes, there is at least the opportunity for those mistakes to be corrected.
 Sent2: That should be a crime which should result in the death penalty.
Example Output:
Not similar