We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Example Input: Sent1: i think that life without opportunity of parole is the more humane and just punishment instead of the death penalty.
 Sent2: Most people who would be deterred already seem to be deterred by life without parole as a punishment.
Example Output: Not similar

Example Input: Sent1: The people who qualify for the death penalty are charged with committing some considerably heinous crime(s) that society has deemed unacceptable.
 Sent2: (4)Death penalty does not intimidate people from committing a crime.
Example Output: Not similar

Example Input: Sent1: The argument for the death penalty as a deterrent has been proved wrong by the implementation of it through history.
 Sent2: Therefore the argument of death as a deterent is a joke.
Example Output:
Similar