instruction:
In this task, you're given a paragraph from the research paper and your task is to generate a suitable title for the research paper based on the given paper. Under 100 words is a good title length.
question:
We evaluated the acceptability of an additional ad hoc influenza vaccination among the health care professionals following seasons with significant antigenic drift. Self-administered, anonymous surveys were performed by hard copy questionnaires in public hospitals, and by an on-line platform available to all healthcare professionals, from April 1st to May 31st, 2015. A total of 1290 healthcare professionals completed the questionnaires, including doctors, nurses, and allied health professionals working in both the public and private systems. Only 31.8% of participating respondents expressed an intention to receive the additional vaccine, despite that the majority of them agreed or strongly agreed that it would bring benefit to the community (88.9%), save lives (86.7%), reduce medical expenses (76.3%), satisfy public expectation (82.8%), and increase awareness of vaccination (86.1%). However, a significant proportion expressed concern that the vaccine could disturb the normal immunization schedule (45.5%); felt uncertain what to do in the next vaccination round (66.0%); perceived that the summer peak might not occur (48.2%); and believed that the summer peak might not be of the same virus (83.5%). Furthermore, 27.8% of all respondents expected that the additional vaccination could weaken the efficacy of previous vaccinations; 51.3% was concerned about side effects; and 61.3% estimated that there would be a low uptake rate. If the supply of vaccine was limited, higher priority groups were considered to include the elderly aged !65 years with chronic medical conditions (89.2%), the elderly living in residential care homes (87.4%), and longstay residents of institutions for the disabled (80.7%). The strongest factors associated with accepting the additional vaccine included immunization with influenza vaccines in the past 3 years, higher perceived risk of contracting influenza, and higher perceived severity of the disease impact. The acceptability to an additional ad hoc influenza vaccination was low among healthcare professionals. This could have a negative impact on such additional vaccination campaigns since healthcare professionals are a key driver for vaccine acceptance. The discordance in perceived risk and acceptance of vaccination regarding self versus public deserves further evaluation. Abbreviations: AOR = adjusted odds ratios, WHO = world health organization. Editor: Barry Margulies. Ã x 2 test or Fisher exact tests for variables with any cell <5. Values are numbers (percentages) of respondents unless stated otherwise. The values in bold represented those with P < 0.10, which were selected as variables in the multivariate regression analysis.
answer:
Ad Hoc Influenza Vaccination During Years of Significant Antigenic Drift in a Tropical City With 2 Seasonal Peaks A Cross-Sectional Survey Among Health Care Practitioners


question:
Please cite this article as: El-Shall N.A., Shewita R.S., Abd El-Hack M.E., AlKahtane A., Alarifi S., Alkahtani S., Abdel-Daim M.M. & Sedeik M.E., Effect of essential oils on the immune response to some viral vaccines in broiler chickens, with special reference to Newcastle disease virus, Poultry Science (2020), doi: https://doi.(Mohamed E. Abd El-Hack). 21 (1952±28.82) did not significantly (p>0.05) improve growth performance compared to 41 the non-treated birds (NC and VC) (1970±19.56 and 1904±38.66). Essential oils 42 showed an antiviral effect on vNDv in vivo (in chickens) as a preventive measure 43 (PRV) as well as some therapeutic effect (TTT) through decreasing the viral shedding 44 titres (loNC 0 ), mortality rate, and severity of clinical signs and post mortem lesions, in 45 addition to serum malondialdhyde (MDA) level. Regarding the other viruses, the EOs 46 mixture did not improve the immune response to the AI and IB vaccines but age (2108±341.05). The studied EOs mixture showed an immune stimulating response 49 to ND and IBD vaccines, antiviral effect against ND virus especially if administered 50 before the challenge, however it did not have a growth promoting effect. 51 52
answer:
Journal Pre-proof Effect of essential oils on the immune response to some viral vaccines in broiler chickens, with special reference to Newcastle disease virus Effect of essential oils on the immune response to some viral vaccines in broiler 3 chickens, with special reference to Newcastle disease virus 4


question:
Inokuma, H., Kerlin, R.L., Kemp, D.H. and Willadsen, P., 1993. Effects of cattle tick (Boophilu.s mtcrophis ) inl~station on the bovine immune system l~,t. Parasitol.. 47:107-I 18. The immunosuppressive effect of experimental Boophilus microplus infestation on bovine peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBL) and on host antibody production to a protein antigen (ovalbumin) was examined. Boophilus microplus infestation caused a marginal decrease in the percentage of T lymphocytes in PBL, which was observed in both lightly (5000 larvae) and heavily (40 000 larvae) infested cattle, and began at the second infestation and continued until the end of the fourth infestation. The percentage ofB lymphocytes in heavily tick-infested cattle was less than that in non-infested control cattle after the fourth infestation. The response of PBL from tick-infested cattle to phytohemagglutinin (PHA) was always less than that of tick-free cattle after the second infestation. No noteworthy differences were detected betwccn the three stages of tick infestation, that is. 1 week before the peak of adult engorgement, the middle of the peak and 1 week after all ticks had dropped. Boophilus microplus saliva ( 100/11 ml-t ) suppressed 47% of the response of bovine PBL to PHA in vitro. This suppressive effect of saliva may contribute to the lower responsiveness of PBL from tick-infested cattle. Antibody production by tick-infested cattle was examined during the third and tourth heavy tick infestation. Tick-infested cattle showed a diminished response against ovalbumin after the second immunization. The immunosuppressive effects of tick infestation may play an important role in tick survival or in the transmission of tick-borne diseases in the field. sponse in the bovine host, which is manifest by mast cell disruption, eosinophil infiltration and concentration at the attachment site (Schleger et al., Correspondence to." H. lnokuma, National Livestock Breeding Center, Ministry' of Agriculture. Forest~' and Fisheries, Nishigho, Nishi-shirakawa, Fukushima 961, Japan.
answer:

Effects of cattle tick (Boophilus microplus) infestation on the bovine immune system