In this task, you're given a statement, and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence clearly disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3' corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.
--------
Question: Statement: That couldn't be good. Choices:  1. It was bad. 2. It would be a good thing. 3. This had happened before.

Answer: 2


Question: Statement: In retrospect, Clinton appears to have shrewdly pitted the Ickes group against Morris as an exercise in the management style FDR called creative tension. Choices:  1. It appears that Clinton used a clever tactic that FDR called creative tension. 2. Clinton often used the management style called 'creative tension'. 3. Franklin Roosevelt never used the term 'creative tension'.

Answer: 3


Question: Statement: and what happened at the end is the judge um um uh Michael wanted wanted the firm put in receivership and the judge wouldn't do it but he said he he's going to give a like a ten day uh evaluation and he was going to put it in the hands of a businessman to to run it and see if the firm was salvageable or not Choices:  1. THe judge agreed with Michael. 2. Michael wanted the firm to be held responsible for the $3million. 3. Michael wanted the firm to be put into receivership.

Answer:
1