The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the uv-part strategy, otherwise output No. uv-part is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to undermine the requirements of the opponent. For instance, suggesting that the opponent would not need more firewood since they already have the basic supplies or a suggestion that there might be a store near the campsite where the opponent can get the supplies instead.

Example Input: Context: 'I totally understand that. And it's pretty important, lol ' 'It sure is..So how much food do you need for the trip? Do you need firewood to cook the food? Thank you for understanding my issues. 🙂' 'I definitely need the food the most. I'm definitely not a "hunter", so if I were to run out, I'd be in pretty sad shape. I do need the firewood for both cooking, and keeping warm. It gets cold at night where we're going. How about youself?'
Utterance: 'Well since we were already given a few supplies before this deal, I was wondering if you could give me all 3 water, and I could give you all the firewood and 2 of the food packages. I only say all the water because we already have some and my medical condition sucks. lol I wish we could camp together! we seem to be a good match. lol! 🙂'
Example Output: Yes

Example Input: Context: 'I would really like to have 3 waters and 3 firewood because this is my first time camping and I don't have survival skills. ' 'You must be a comedian.  We will need to come to a compromise because there's no way that's going to happen.  I am like a water buffalo so I'll need at least two waters.  In addition, my family is from the South and will need firewood as well.' 'I can't swim too. I think two waters will help me to survive on this trip and I will need at least two firewood to make fish or other food items for my family. '
Utterance: 'You don't need this water to swim.  You can take two of the food if you're worried about food.  I will take two water and two firewood since I have a large family to nourish and keep warm.  Your initial suggestion of 3  waters and firewood is laughable.  Please provide a realistic compromise.'
Example Output: Yes

Example Input: Context: 'I think we'll both need each of the three items, but we can't split them evenly. How about I take 2 waters, 2 firewoods, and a food. You can have two food packages, a water, and a firewood.' 'hi bro, 2 water for 2 firewood 1 food for me'
Utterance: 'Do you need the extra water? I get super thirsty and I'd be willing to give up another firewood to get an extra water, while we still get at least one of each.'
Example Output:
Yes