In this task, you're given a statement, and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence clearly disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3' corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.

Example Input: Statement: It is sufficient to note, however, that Stevenson was content to rely on a mix of his own admitted bloodthirstiness and good old-fashioned prejudice for his conclusion. Choices:  1. Stevenson relied on his thirst for blood and prejudice.  2. Stevenson was just and relied on the truth. 3. Stevenson will do anything to get ahead. 
Example Output: 2

Example Input: Statement: In the future, Clinton and Blair say, false oppositions between competition and compassion, efficiency and equity, will be resolved. Choices:  1. Other leaders agree with the sentiment that the false oppositions between competition and compassion will be resolved. 2. Clinton feels that efficiency and equity cannot coexist, while Blair feels that this is a false opposition. 3. Clinton and Blair have very similar views on resolving certain issues.
Example Output: 2

Example Input: Statement: By 123 b.c. the Romans had pacified most of Spain and sent out an invading force. Choices:  1. Spain had originally had feuds with Rome, but the feuds were mostly resolved by 123 b.c. 2. Spain conquered Rome in 115 b.c. 3. Rome used Spain as a jumping-off point to begin invading Morocco.
Example Output:
2