We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Input: Consider Input: Sent1: People use the argument that we should not execute people based on the possibility that they may be innocent, but they could care less if we lock someone up for life who may be innocent.
 Sent2: If they don't want to kill an innocent person, stick to life in prison.

Output: Not similar


Input: Consider Input: Sent1: You are against of violence, but have you ever thought that death penalty is also violence?
 Sent2: You can't just assume the death penalty is a crime.

Output: Not similar


Input: Consider Input: Sent1: There has seldom if ever been any occurrence in which someone has violently avenged a murderer's death.
 Sent2: The death sentence has been used since the beginning of the United States, and rarely, if ever, has there been an occurrence in which someone avenges the death of a murderer or rapist.


Output: Similar