We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

Q: It's quite obvious by this and as well as the SCOTUS decision that the right to keep and bear arms is not dependent on the militia part, but the other way around.

A: Valid
****
Q: The gun rights advocates I know are generally not like this, they support rights regardless if whther they agree with how they are being practiced or not.

A: Valid
****
Q: voiceofreason, can you explane why the second amendment is preceded by an individual right, and followed by individual rights, in a document that is laying out what the goverment cannot do to it's people?

A:
Valid
****