In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: insult and non-insult. Insult is any lanugage or act that is disrespectful or scornfully abusive.

[EX Q]: Comment: No, JC, your Trump is an utter fool and you got conned.
[EX A]: Insult

[EX Q]: Comment: I'm not surprised that support for women is coming from bishops in India--nor am I surprised that the 2012 Delhi gang rape was cited as a catalyst. If you have ever had the opportunity to listen to one of the rapists . . . soft-spoken but quietly unrepentant because, after all, the woman asked for it by being out and about with a man who was not her husband or brother. Absolutely horrifying. There is one region in the country as well where tribal leaders refuse to allow "their women" to have any rights; they are literally barefoot and pregnant in the kitchen.

The bishops of India see firsthand what patriarchy has done to the women of India and have the moral courage to become agents of change. There are also some pro-women's-ordination advocates among them. May they continue to speak out!
[EX A]: Non-insult

[EX Q]: Comment: This argument makes lot of sense. I am surprised that Saunders left out of his article the attacks in Paris and Brussels. In both cases, you had individuals who have already been to prison for violent crime before the "found" their religious faith or devotion to a violent group. To suggest the ideology is the primary motivator is to oversimplify. The people who went to Syria to fight for (or against) ISIS are likely motived by the thrill of the fight, more than any strict adherence to religious doctrine. Mercenary armies like Blackwater attract such people all the time.
[EX A]:
Non-insult