We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Sent1: "We know for a FACT that innocent people have been put to death already"- then give me their names.
 Sent2: The list of men on death row who were found to be innocent and released is long and growing, and we can only guess how many innocents have been put to death.
Similar

Sent1: If these are indeed comparable, I wouldn't argue for the death penalty even in murder.
 Sent2: I am not a pacifist, so I am not opposed to all state-sanctioned killing.
Not similar

Sent1: Most people would agree that someone who kills someone in self defense doesn't deserve the death penalty, but there have been a couple of recent cases where someone killed someone in revenge for molesting their children.
 Sent2: No letting the family or friends of the victim kill the convicted person might be childish revenge.

Not similar