We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

Input: Consider Input: In Silveira v. Lockyer the 9th Circuit Court ruled that California's Assault Weapons Control Act is not unconstitutional and that the second amendment does not protect an individual right.

Output: Valid


Input: Consider Input: The Second Amendment isn't a gun control law, it's an individual right, independent from militia service.

Output: Valid


Input: Consider Input: It sounds like the author wishes to use fear as a weapon to unconstitutionally restrict the RKBA.


Output: Valid