In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Input: Consider Input: Comment: The question I have for BLM is: why aren't you hijacking and staging a sit-in at Toronto's Caribbean Festival Parade in August to highlight your message and agenda? It would seem like you would have a far more receptive and understanding audience there.
But no. BLM is blatantly using Pride because it is a bigger, broader, more popular and better-attended event. BLM absolutely does not care at all about the gay community; if so, they would be highlighting the homophobia and anti-gay violence in Caribbean and African counties, where gays have absolutely no rights at all.
The police absolutely must be allowed to march in next year's Pride parade. And BLM, by having violated the rules on parade participation on Sunday, must be banned.

Output: Non-obscene


Input: Consider Input: Comment: I guess it takes all kinds.  This comment is so crude and distorted that all I could do was try to find some humor in it.  Couldn't do it.

Output: Non-obscene


Input: Consider Input: Comment: Good. Coughenour is a fucking toolbag, so life should have been awarded to Wilson, but hey--it is Port Angeles. Child molesters run wild!


Output: Obscene