Categorize the comment on the basis of severe toxicity. If the comment is severely toxic output Yes, otherwise output No.

Ex Input:
Excursion Inlet is actually part of Haines.  People there pay property taxes to Haines (without happiness) whereas just a few miles west to Gustavus there are no property taxes.  Not related to this story but the Dispatch needs to know Alaska geography.

Ex Output:
No


Ex Input:
What a pile of fucking tripe. Portland died the day Mark Zussman bought Willamette Week. Totally makes sense that some rich guy who lives in Riverdale owns Portland's alternative weekly. If that's not the fox guarding the coop, then you tell me what is.

Ex Output:
Yes


Ex Input:
Sorry, but anyone who believes that Saudi Arabia's ultra-reactionary philosophy of bigotry and hatred of other religions ( including other sects of Islam )  is anything new is either blatantly lying, or is insane.

So OK, if he is not lying, then I guess that we can say that the poor man is delusional, and is mentally ill.

I've posted clear facts showing that other members of the press ( and even his own newspaper, the New York Times ), have known about this for a very long time.    This is not a new development.  Not by any means.   To state otherwise, as he has done here in this editorial, is to spread FALSEHOODS.

What he said is a LIE.   For it is NOT TRUE.

Ex Output:

Yes