In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Input: Consider Input: Comment: Legislators are worthless as tits on a boat hog!

Output: Sexual-explicit


Input: Consider Input: Comment: Maybe Mr Hill should not waited until 5 days before the vote to request a ballot . I live in Prince Edward Island and I call the office about 3 weeks before the deadline and a very nice young lady mailed me a ballot and I returned it the next day after it was received.  I assume that it got counted.  I  placed Mr Scheer second on my ballot and did not put Mr. Bernier in the top 10.  Mainly on the dairy issue. He should know that canada Post would not get it to him in time. Suck it up and move on.

Output: Sexual-explicit


Input: Consider Input: Comment: From a notorious socialist source Newsweek: In 2006, Forbes magazine estimated, without providing any evidence, that Castro had a personal wealth of $900 million. Castro called the claim “rubbish” and vowed to resign if anyone found he had a foreign account containing “even one dollar.” “All this makes me sick,” he said on a state-run television program.


Output: Non-sexual-explicit