instruction:
In this task, you are given a passage which has a question and the context. You have to generate an answer to the question based on the information present in the context.
question:
Context: To investigate the prognostic value of the pre-treatment haemoglobin level in patients with advanced squamous cell head and neck cancer treated with induction polychemotherapy.', 'Seventy-two patients with advanced squamous cell head and neck cancer received primary combination chemotherapy consisting of docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) on day 1, cisplatin 100 mg/m(2) on day 1, and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) 1000 mg/m(2)/day on days 1-4 (total dose 4000 mg/m(2)), repeated on days 1, 22 and 43 followed by chemoradiation. The data collected included pre-treatment haemoglobin, response to treatment, disease-free and overall survival.', 'The pre-treatment haemoglobin level was found to be a significant predictor of response to induction chemotherapy (P = 0.01) and an independent predictor of overall survival [hazard ratio (HR) 0.77, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.58-1.03, P = 0.0001] and disease free survival (HR 2.09, 95% CI 1.41-3.09, P = 0.0001). Furthermore N-stage was found to be a significant prognostic factor of overall survival (HR 9.24, 95% CI 6.90-21.34, P = 0.005). The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status scale was also found to be significant for disease free survival (HR 7.66, 95% CI 2.61-22.46, P = 0.003).\Question: Does pre-treatment haemoglobin level predict response and survival after TPF induction polychemotherapy in advanced head and neck cancer patients?
answer:
In patients with advanced squamous cell head and neck cancer, the haemoglobin level prior to induction chemotherapy is significantly related to outcome including response and survival.


question:
Context: Observational studies suggest that dietary isoflavones reduce breast cancer risk, and this may be caused in part by effects on endogenous hormone concentrations. Because intestinal bacteria metabolize isoflavones, it was hypothesized that consumption of probiotic bacteria would enhance the biologic effects of isoflavones, including effects on endogenous hormones.', 'Twenty (20) postmenopausal breast cancer survivors and 20 healthy postmenopausal women completed four 42-day diet periods in a randomized, crossover design. They received one of the following: isolated soy protein; isolated milk protein; soy + probiotic capsules; or milk + probiotic capsules. Each protein supplement provided 0.38 g protein/(kg body weight/day) (26.6 +/- 4.5 g protein/day) and soy protein provided 0.64 mg isoflavones/(kg body weight/day) (44.4 +/- 7.5 mg isoflavones/day). Probiotic capsules provided 10(9) colony-forming units Lactobacillus acidophilus (strain DDS-1), Bifidobacterium longum, and 15-20 mg fructo-oligosaccharide.', 'Plasma samples were collected at baseline and after each diet for analysis of estrogens, follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), androgens, and sex hormone?binding globulin (SHBG).', 'Hormone levels were not affected by soy, probiotic supplements, or equol producer status, and neither cancer status nor equol producer status altered the effects of soy or probiotics. Furthermore probiotics did not alter the effects of soy consumption. Soy protein tended to decrease SHBG compared to milk protein diets (p = 0.05), although both proteins significantly decreased SHBG relative to baseline (p = 0.0001 and p = 0.03).\Question: Does short-term soy and probiotic supplementation markedly affect concentrations of reproductive hormones in postmenopausal women with and without histories of breast cancer?
answer:
These data suggest that short-term, moderate consumption of isoflavone-containing soy protein and consumption of these particular probiotic capsules do not significantly alter reproductive hormone concentrations in breast cancer survivors or controls, regardless of equol producer status.


question:
Context: The receptor activator of NF-kB ligand (RANKL) has a critical role in osteoclast activation. Recently it has been demonstrated that human multiple myeloma (MM) cells do not express RANKL but up-regulate RANKL in bone marrow stromal cells (BMSC). To further investigate the role of RANKL in the pathophysiology of MM we evaluated the expression of its receptor RANK in MM cells and in the BM environment and the potential role of RANKL in the interaction of myeloma cells with the microenvironment.', 'RANK mRNA and protein expression were evaluated by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction and Western blot analysis in human myeloma cell lines (HMCL), fresh purified MM cells, BMSC and endothelial cells. Moreover the effect and the role of RANKL on cytokine secretion were evaluated in BMSC, in endothelial cells and in co-culture conditions with myeloma cells.', 'We found that RANK is expressed in BMSC and endothelial cells but not in myeloma cells. Consistently, RANKL did not have a direct effect on myeloma cell survival, but RANKL treatment induced a significant increase of interleukin (IL)-6 and IL-11 secretion by both BMSC and endothelial cells. Moreover, in a co-culture system we found that myeloma cells up-regulated both IL-6 and IL-11 secretion by BMSC and endothelial cells through cell-to-cell contact. The presence of the RANK-Fc that blocks the RANK/RANKL interaction significantly inhibited HMCL-induced secretion of IL-6 and IL-11.\Question: Is the RANK/RANK ligand system involved in interleukin-6 and interleukin-11 up-regulation by human myeloma cells in the bone marrow microenvironment?
answer:

Our data provide new notions on the role of the RANKL system in the pathophysiology of MM.