In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

[EX Q]: Comment: Someone that has an inkling of how TOTALLY FUCKED UP... our system is...

Don't just think about the Patent lawyers screwing you out of all your money, Think then about barrier # 2.  The academic frauds that have all the money in the world, if the idea is real, TOTALLY want  to screw you.... and decimate your reputation...

Then #3, the business slease-bags, cause they realize theirs money in it,  obviously  for them,

They... Just have to dress up in the morning, and lie like thieves..

Good luck with the whole "High Tech" thing.... in Can't-A'Duh
[EX A]: Non-identity-attack

[EX Q]: Comment: nobody else in the world would call any Hispanick "white".  Liberals know it makes Hispanicks feel proud to refer to them as "white" and Hillary Clinton as "non-Hispanick white".  But when you deport a Hispanick, they then claim we are doing it because we don't want "non whites in the USA".
[EX A]: Identity-attack

[EX Q]: Comment: Consider the author, I don't even read his gibberish, it's always the same old rhetoric. I obviously do read these comments though, they are generally pretty interesting.
[EX A]:
Non-identity-attack