In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

[EX Q]: Comment: Ya know, I gotta say, I don't find it much comfort to hear that "well, other denominations are losing adherents too."  (As bad as the "well, other people abuse children too" with the implication that the hierarchy is somehow excused from the abuse and cover-up.)  The overall drift away from Catholicism and other Christian denominations suggests a bigger overall problem.  Christianity began and grew in the midst of a decadent secular Roman society, so frankly, it's not society's fault.  I can't help thinking too many supposed Christian leaders have become too wrapped up in trying to dominate society with secular power rather than leading by spiritual example.
[EX A]: Non-sexual-explicit

[EX Q]: Comment: I think you ought to review the data on primaries. Sanders has won total of 19 state contests...most of his wins were in states that do not have primaries. Instead, like Alaska, they have caucuses. In Alaska, less than 550 people participated in the Democratic caucuses. There are apartment complexes in Anchorage with more people than that. Where everyone actually gets a chance to vote in primaries Clinton has won overwhelmingly. That is why she has more than 3,000,000 more votes than Sanders. You are entitled too your own opinions, but not your own facts.
[EX A]: Non-sexual-explicit

[EX Q]: Comment: Given all of the hateful rhetoric and even actions  spewing from the left, the deep state, Democratic politicians, nobody should be surprised that yet another Democrat has launched a murderous, bloody hate crime attack on conservatives.
[EX A]:
Non-sexual-explicit