In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

[Q]: Comment: Stole the election huh?   More like had it handed to them by an incompetent bunch that arrogantly presumed it was theirs to keep.  For your edification, today's Democrats aren't your ( or my ) daddy's, and your trotting out the 1960's nostalgia file only underlines the point. Trump got elected in large measure because the Democrats are little better than Republicans( and worse in some aspects) when it comes to economic issues faced by your average voter. As a matter of fact, a number of well-knowns have made the case that Richard Nixon was our last truly "liberal"( you know, supporting all the good domestic stuff, Watergate excepted) president. Reviewing the record, I'd have to agree. Stick that in your partisan pipe and smoke it. 

"Trumplicans don't even support voting rights. They're un-American and fascists who love Putin."

Just substitute "communists" for "fascists" and you'd be right at home with Joe McCarthy. Your a true patriot.
[A]: Non-identity-attack


[Q]: Comment: We get it. All whites are racist.
[A]: Identity-attack


[Q]: Comment: @Rich 
Perhaps those people who are so focused on defining people by their skin colour are the root cause of the ridiculousness. An article from a publication like that Globe that defines the country in that way -- "brown" "white" etc. -- is still ridiculous.
[A]:
Identity-attack