Given a document and an entity the task is to select the author's sentiment towards the entity. Sentiments can be Positive, Neutral and Negative. Select Positive if the article expresses a positive view towards the given entity or praises its quality or skills. Select Neutral if the document expresses no clear view towards the entity or has equal amounts of positive and negative statements or expressing some fact/quote by someone else. Select Negative if the article expresses a negative view towards like harsh remarks, criticizing entities action/decision etc. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

Q: What is the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Armour ? A woman runs past an Under Armour store in downtown Chicago on Oct. 16. (Christopher Dilts/Bloomberg)
Americans  it seems  are over Under Armour.
âThis is an abrupt about-turn for a company that  until recently  was on a mission to challenge the might of Nike â Neil Saunders  managing director of the analytical firm GlobalData Retail  said in an email. âUnder  Armour  has become just another brand in a sea of brands.â
The problems are multiple  he said. Although Under  Armour  racks up billions of dollars in sales each year  analysts say it has failed to drum up much loyalty among its customers. It has also been slow to resonate with women and has struggled to compete with larger rivals such as Nike and Adidas  which often offer lower-priced goods. Another factor: bankruptcy filings by key retail distributors such as Sports Authority and Sports Chalet.
âWe are incredibly disappointed with our 2017 performance â Kevin Plank  Under Armourâs founder and chief executive  said during the call with analysts. âWe have not performed to the level we had originally aspired to.â
Under Armour tried to keep up  he said  by discounting prices and offering more promotions than usual  which further cut into the companyâs profit margins. But  Plank added  those were just temporary efforts to shore up sales and not a long-term strategy for the company  which once could command higher prices than its competitors. (Menâs running shoes  for example  start at $74.99 at  Under Armour   $65 at Adidas and $60 at Nike  according to the companiesâ websites.)
âIn no way  shape or form do we anticipate changing the pricing model that makes Under Armour special and unique â Plank said. âWe invented the $25 T-shirt. Weâve pressed the bounds as to what consumers will pay for apparel. Thatâll continue. No one is looking for  Under Armour  to have the $25 hooded fleece. They want Under  Armour  at the $75 and $100 price points.â
But analysts say that might be a tough sell  particularly as customers grow accustomed to deep discounts. Saunders added that a âmarked slowdownâ in demand for athletic apparel is likely to further complicate Under  Armour âs turnaround efforts.
âWhile customer numbers have risen  loyalty to the brand is not deep-rooted in the same way that it is at Lululemon and Nike â he wrote. âWhat this means is that as demand moderated  Under  Armour  has been quick to drop off the radar of many consumers.â
The latest round of disappointing earnings comes on the heels of a tough year. The company posted its first-ever loss in April and in August announced it would lay off 2 percent of its workers. Thereâs also been changes to the leadership team. Still   shares of Under Armour stock  which are currently trading at about $13   have lost more than half  their  value this year.

A: Negative
****
Q: What is the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Roger Launius ? But Americans' concerns about the technological capabilities of their own nation relative to those of the USSR didn't fully bloom until two months later  after the Soviets had launched a dog to space and the United States' first attempt to loft a satellite had failed spectacularly  said  former NASA Chief Historian Roger Launius . [Sputnik 1! 7 Fun Facts About Humanity's First Satellite]
"The way I tend to phrase it is  you get three strikes  and you're out "  Launius  told Space.com.
The launch of the beach-ball-size Sputnik 1 did not come as a shock to American national-security officials  who had expected something big was in the works. But it did catch  the public off-guard  Launius  said.
"The media at the time asked him a couple of questions about Sputnik  and then they moved on to other things "  Launius  said. "The big story of the day was the Little Rock crisis — are you going to bring in federal troops to desegregate the Little Rock [Arkansas] school system?"
But the mood shifted noticeably on Nov. 3  1957  when the USSR successfully launched Sputnik 2 to orbit   Launius  said.
"It certainly salved the open wound; there's no doubt about that "  Launius  said of Explorer 1  which famously discovered the Van Allen radiation belts surrounding Earth.
But this success didn't erase all memories of the wound. Over time  the three-tiered Sputnik moment spurred the U.S. government to ramp up the nation's technological capabilities   Launius  said.

A: Positive
****
Q: What is the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Robert Mueller ? Two attorneys representing key Donald Trump associates say they consider it possible that  special counsel Robert Mueller  could end up indicting the president for obstruction of justice  Politico is reporting.
Neither attorney claimed to have inside information about  Mueller 's plans and based their comments on their understanding of the law  according to Politico.
But the website noted many legal experts maintain  Mueller  lacks the standing to bring charges against Trump.
Still  one of the lawyers  who represents a senior Trump official  said  Mueller  could try to indict the president even if the move brings challenges from Trump's attorneys.
"It's entirely possible that  Mueller  may go that route on the theory that  as an open question  it should be for the courts to decide " the attorney said. "Even if the indictment is dismissed  it puts maximum pressure on Congress to treat this with the independence and intellectual honesty that it will never  ever get."
And one legal expert maintained  Mueller  will never indict the president.
" Mueller  will not indict Trump for obstruction of justice or for any crime. Period. Full stop. End of story. Speculations to the contrary are just fantasy.

A:
Neutral
****