The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.

Input: Consider Input: Context: 'ok I will just be able to get by with 2 of the food, I can give you all 3 of the water if I can take 2 of the wood. I have panic attacks in the dark.' 'Okay that works for me as well.' 'awesome any chance I could persuade you to substitute your 1 food item for an additional fire wood 🙂'
Utterance: 'No I cannot do that unfortunately. We brought just enough food for our weekend trip, and I cannot lose any or we will run out before our camping trip is over.'

Output: Yes


Input: Consider Input: Context: 'Yes please ..! My son has respiratory problems I'll definitely need that 😡😡😡' 'If you really need water, then can I have 2 firewood and 3 food then?' 'No I really need food also ...at least I will take 3 food and 2 water and you can take remaining'
Utterance: 'I'll let you take 3 food and 1 water, and I will take the rest.'

Output: No


Input: Consider Input: Context: 'You mean you can't let up one firewood for me?' 'Not this time, I really need all the firewood and food is a large need for my family of 8. We need the firewood to cook all our meals from the animals we hunt since we are short on food.' 'But these are only additional packages☹️'
Utterance: 'I get that and understand completely. I have a large number of mouths to feed making the food a necessity or all the firewood to cook whatever we hunt. How many you have?'


Output: Yes