In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

[EX Q]: Comment: Yes, let's end the insanity!  No more trans people! No more boys kissing boys! No more rock n roll music! Let's get back to the good ol' days of the 1950s!
[EX A]: Identity-attack

[EX Q]: Comment: The blacks are the ones that are racists. They hate white people and do not hesitate to let them know that fact. Ridiculous waste of time and energy in this article. Just trying to make white people feel guilty once again for slavery..which is really stupid.
[EX A]: Identity-attack

[EX Q]: Comment: " I have one position in public and another in private."  For private matters that is quite acceptable.  

For a politician to say one thing in public and then in private to say another thing to get money from Wall Street raises the issue of honesty, trust, and whether that politician has any moral position at all or will say anything to advance her own interests.

I think it's referred to as hypocrisy and lying.
[EX A]:
Non-identity-attack