instruction:
In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
question:
Comment: Rep. Munoz's side of the story, Gegonos, is in the two letters that she wrote to a judge(s) advocating for two child rapists.  Munoz's two letters are now public record in the state's court system and now they're indefensible.  Whoever is running against Munoz in November better use this self-baptized blunder to unseat Munoz.  Juneau's has a strong liberal base and I'll watch and see what the CONservative bases does with this politically incorrect issue.  And don't forget it was Jack's wife that contacted OCS and made the formal report that her husband was having an inappropriate relationship with their foster daughter.
answer:
Agree


question:
Comment: A cash for access event.  A donation to Pierre Elliott Trudeau Foundation.  He must be getting advise from the Clintons and Premier Wynne.  This is corruption at every possible level.  Justin has just become the new Duffy.
answer:
Agree


question:
Comment: But remember, he said he's not breaking any rules. At the same time, small business wasn't breaking any rules either, and yet, they've been painted by the Liberals as wealthy tax cheats who avoid paying their fair share.
answer:

Agree