TASK DEFINITION: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: threat and non-threat. Threat is a statement that someone will be hurt or harmed, especially if the person does not do something in particular.
PROBLEM: Comment: Put a fork in him!

SOLUTION: Threat

PROBLEM: Comment: Hahahaha. Now tell us PC spokesperson pretty please, did Ms. Ambrose make the calls to the ethics people after Trudeau's vacation event became public and and turned into a cheap political play? She would have to be awfully dumb if she did not. In addition to the hypocrisy the layer of parsing non existent differences is boggling.

SOLUTION: Non-threat

PROBLEM: Comment: I will repeat the actual fact that you are wrong.  There are more than just two ex cathedra decrees.  I named two others.  I also told you where you could find a collection of them all.  See, I’m backing up my facts with evidence.  You are relying purely upon your foolish pride.  I have also explained to you the difference between de fide dogmata and ex cathedra dogmata.  It’s called “theological certainty.”  You seem to imply, erroneously, that ex cathedra dogma is superior in some way to de fide dogmata.
Consider that you actually stated that the Church does not teach that Christ ordained the 12 Apostles.  I provided you with the canons from the Council of Trent with made it clear that Christ both instituted the sacrament of Holy Orders at the Last Supper, and that He ordained the 12 Apostles at the very same time.  You have been proven wrong in every one of our disagreements, but through your foolish pride, you will not admit it.
Women can never, ever be validly ordained, period.

SOLUTION:
Non-threat