We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Input: Consider Input: Sent1: Given the scrutiny of death penalty cases, it seems that we would be more likely to lock someone up for life in prison and never uncover their innocence than we are to execute an innocent person.
 Sent2: We should not even have the death penalty just on the off chance that we might execute somebody who is innocent.

Output: Not similar


Input: Consider Input: Sent1: There is not any good by taking the life of the criminal.
 Sent2: If death penalty were the solution for such criminal actions, then people who are "good" and have contributed to society deserve to live forever.

Output: Not similar


Input: Consider Input: Sent1: All you have done is state a proclamation that all crimes must be punished, without giving any of your reasons behind that.
 Sent2: Second reason is that prisoners, who committed very cruel crimes and have a life term punishment, shouldn't be provided by government.


Output: Not similar