We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

[EX Q]: Amendment recognizes an individual right, even if it further declared the right to be ���fundamental��� (which it should be), would still not be a doomsday decision for gun control proponents.
[EX A]: Valid

[EX Q]: Sly "Rambo" Stallone called for house-to-house confiscation of firearms in the U.S. Arnold "Terminator" Schwarzenegger publicly advocates every measure promoted by "gun control" groups while still saying that he believes in the Second Amendment.
[EX A]: Valid

[EX Q]: People constantly trumpet about how having a gun means that they can protect themselves, but first they must be able to fire the gun on another human being, something that most people find hard to do.
[EX A]:
Valid