In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: insult and non-insult. Insult is any lanugage or act that is disrespectful or scornfully abusive.

Comment: Nature has killed far more than humans through a wide variety of extinctions.  Should we hate nature?

So, you want to kill humans, eh?  Interesting.  Have at it.  Just keep it in your domain and not mine.
Non-insult

Comment: You both are SICK FUCKS AND SHOULD ROT IN HELL.I HOPE YOU GUYS FEEL THE RAPE WRATH WHILE YOU TWO ARE IN PRISON AND IM SURE SOMEONE WILL VIOLATE YOU AS YOU TWO DID AGAINST INNOCENT CHILDREN .AND THE MAN IN THIS CASE SHOULD HAVE HIS PENUS AND BALLS REMOVED AND HIS HANDS CUT OFF AND HIS TONGE REMOVED AND FOR THE LADY ACTUALLY I CANT EVEN CALL THEM MAN / WOMEN YOU TWO ARE A WASTE OF HUMAN FLESH DISCUSTING .
Insult

Comment: Does diversity correlate to higher dividends for stockholders? Do all male engineering companies have a lower return to stockholders than engineering companies with higher percentages of females? I'd be quite interested to know of any research that shows that. And is it just diversity in general? Or specific kinds of diversity? Does diversity of gender deliver the same reward as diversity of race?
Let's remember the original claim that I was responding to:
"The best companies are the ones that, whenever possible and within reason, try to ensure their employee base reflects the diversity of their customers."
That's a pretty big claim which amounts to: "a mostly black company, or even a racially mixed company, cannot serve a mostly white customer base as well" Are you really sure you want to be making that claim?

Non-insult