We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Example Input: there is no evidence of people intentionally visiting another in a dream, though claims have been made.
Example Output: Invalid

Example Input: wow you fucking say i thing the ala-bye is the most important key to a murder investigation earlier and now i am saying that forensic evidence the the fucking key!!!!
Example Output: Invalid

Example Input: From that point of view, I also do feel some sense of embarrassment about this aspect of our society when confronted with challenges from Europeans and others who, from this point of view, seem more "civilized".
Example Output:
Invalid