Given a document, find the main entity about whom the author is writing. Write the full name if mentioned in the text. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

The ombudsman says it is investigating claims  President Rodrigo Duterte 's bank accounts had hundreds of millions of pesos (millions of dollars) which he failed to disclose as required by law (AFP Photo/NOEL CELIS)
 Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte  has said  he  would not cooperate with a special anti-corruption prosecutor's investigation into allegations  he  acquired ill-gotten wealth  vowing  he  would "not submit" to its authority.
The ombudsman said last week it was investigating claims  Duterte 's bank accounts had hundreds of millions of pesos (millions of dollars) which  he  failed to disclose as required by law.
 Duterte  responded by lashing out at the ombudsman  calling the agency "lousy" and saying allegations against  him  were "lies based on baseless" information.
"I will not submit to the jurisdiction (of the ombudsman) "  Duterte  said in a curse-laden speech to local lawyers on Saturday night.
"Waving fabricated evidence  lying to his teeth in front of the nation and then you want me to submit to the jurisdiction of the ombudsman  " Duterte  said referring to Deputy Ombudsman Melchor Arthur Carandang who had announced the probe.
 Duterte 's remarks contradicted his spokesman's statement last week that the president respected the ombudsman and trusted its impartiality.
 Duterte   72  won last year's presidential elections on a brutal law-and-order and anti-corruption platform.
During  the election campaign Duterte  had said  he  came from a poor family and lived a modest lifestyle which boosted  his  image as an anti-establishment politician representing the common folk  analysts said.
The ombudsman probe stemmed from a plunder complaint filed before the elections by opposition senator Antonio Trillanes who alleged  Duterte  embezzled government funds during his more than two-decade stint as mayor of the southern city of Davao.
On Saturday   Duterte  said his family had properties and businesses including an ice plant and lumberyard  adding his late father was a provincial governor.
Rodrigo Duterte

MURDEROUS  thin-skinned and in possession of nuclear weapons  the North Korean dictator   Kim Jong Un   has one good deed to  his  name:  he  has united America and China. Max Baucus  Americaâs ambassador to Beijing until January 2017  recalls the Chinese president  Xi Jinping  privately expressing âdisgustâ at Mr Kimâs reckless pursuit of nukes and missiles to carry them to other continents. Mr Xiâs frustration with North Koreaâs hereditary despot stands out as âthe strongest statement that I have ever heard Xi makeâ  says Mr Baucus. China has never sounded as closely aligned with America when it comes to using sanctions and diplomatic pressure  in a last-ditch bid to change how Mr Kim calculates his regimeâs interests.
Unfortunately for relations between the worldâs two biggest economies  China will hate the next steps that America is likely to take on North Korea. Evan Medeiros  until 2015 the senior director for Asia in Barack Obamaâs National Security Council  says that when the Chinese accuse America of refusing to engage in talks with the regime  this is largely âposturingâ. But behind it lies a truth  that âsanctions wonât stop North Koreaâ. When battling the proliferation of the deadliest weapons  sanctions are always in a race with technology  says Mr Medeiros  now with the Eurasia Group  a consultancy. âKim Jong Un is close to grasping the brass ring. We have probably lost the race and need to think about deterrence.â This could include deploying new missiles and missile-defence systems in South Korea and Japan  and perhaps another aircraft-carrier in the region.
Still  cold-war theories of deterrence are being dusted off  with such jargon as âsecond-strike capabilityââthe certainty that a country attacked with nuclear weapons can retaliate massively. Douglas Paal  a senior Asia hand in the Reagan White House and both Bush administrations  approves of the Senate plan to place more interceptors in Alaska  in part to gain leverage over China. âWe need to layer up more missile defence. China needs to see that their second-strike capacity is really deteriorating  which hurts them.â Mr Paal  who runs the Asia programme at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace  a think-tank  is in frequent contact with envoys of governments including Chinaâs and  recently  North Koreaâs. He concedes the need for talks with the  Kim  regime  alongside containment and deterrence  but notes that in previous negotiations  North Korea wanted an end to American defence alliances in Asia and to Americaâs troop presence in South Korea: âSo we canât get there.â
A policy of containment would not just strain relations with China as new American weapons bristled in Asia. Global non-proliferation regimes would be tested  not least because a North Korea facing crippling sanctions might see selling nuclear technology as a lifeline. Perhaps Chinaâs greatest nightmare involves Japan feeling compelled to build nuclear weapons (it could quickly develop the technology). A Chinese build-up of warheads in response could result in India and then Pakistan increasing their stockpiles. The unity fostered by  Mr Kim  may thus prove short-lived. If  he  builds the arsenal  he  wants  China and America will be sincere in their shared dismay. But if America then prepares to contain him  a whole new Sino-American stand-off may begin.
Kim Jong Un

Diane and Lee Whitcraft of Webster  Wis. Diane has multiple sclerosis and is forgoing medication because of its cost under her Medicare prescription drug plan. (Courtesy of Diane Whitcraft)
 Whitcraft  took  her  last dose of Betaseron on January 5. So far   she  hasn't had another attack  but  she  knows the threat is always there.  She  said  she  wouldn't have made the same decision to stop the drug if  she  were younger  and  she  wrestled with what to do.
This summer   she  did something  she  thinks  she  should have done a long time ago.  She  wrote a letter to the chief executive of Bayer  the company that makes the drug.
But  Whitcraft  still doesn't understand why  her  drug  which launched with a list price of about $11 500 more than two decades ago  costs so much today â a question  she  raised in  her  letter.
âIt wasnât filled with anger or anything; I just told him that I had quit the drug  and why. And I suggested someone must be very greedy â  she  said. âIt's so wrong and so unfair â a drug that was marketed for the first time in 1993 . . . Why did the cost go up so much here?â
 Whitcraft  said  she  got a phone call from the company offering the drug at a discounted rate  months after  she  had come to the difficult decision to stop taking it.  She  wondered  if the company could offer  her  a discount on an individual basis  why they couldn't just lower the price for everyone.

Lee Whitcraft