In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

[EX Q]: Comment: I'd say it's more likely that Trump knows what the Clinton's have on him, and knows that he's the only loser if he goes after Hillary now.
[EX A]: Non-obscene

[EX Q]: Comment: That's a nice story, except that it's not true.  I was very surprised when I heard Kershaw wasn't starting.  Like I said, Darvish looked like crap in game 3, and his eyes looked lost.  No way I would have started him in a game 7 with Kershaw available.  And again, the metrics on Darvish vs. the Astros are pretty astounding.  Frankly, I wouldn't even have put Darvish on the roster for the WS, given his history with the Astros.
[EX A]: Obscene

[EX Q]: Comment: Alright, I'm gonna quote a white guy, because I know it's necessary for some of you.

"Colonies are the outhouses of the European soul, where a fellow can let his pants down and relax, enjoy the smell of his own shit." 
-Thomas Pynchon

The neighborhood we knew is gone, so you guys are gonna do what you want. Have fun wallowing in your own shit.
[EX A]:
Obscene