We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

[EX Q]: Sent1: So, seems to me that when you make death a quick (as in timely) and certain punishment, there is most definitely a deterent effect.
 Sent2: The dealth penalty is not as simple as it seems.
[EX A]: Not similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: I see what you mean, but i'm still against killing people .
 Sent2: I find it quite strange that no one bothered to ask why you why are against killing people...
[EX A]: Not similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: Since murder is viewed as wrong, it generally makes more sense to eliminate the death penalty because murder rates are generally lower in those states.
 Sent2: In the United States, states without the death penalty has consistently lower murder rates.
[EX A]:
Similar