The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.

[Q]: Context: 'do you have a particular item preference?' 'I do.  I have been looking everything over and feel this won't be to hard to come to an agreement' 'Well my camp places a premium on water.  How would you feel about for me: 2 water, 1 food, 1 firewood?'
Utterance: 'I think we're on the right track.  I am bring my 2 kids with me and they eat everything in sight.'
[A]: Yes


[Q]: Context: 'Actually that does sound a lot better I would be willing to do that. So 2 firewood for 3 water?' 'Yea but what about the food?' 'Oh right, how about you get 3 waters , 2 food and 0 firewood. And I'll get 3 firewood and 1 food?'
Utterance: 'That sounds like a good deal to me 🙂'
[A]: No


[Q]: Context: 'I do too.' 'Can you give me your offer?' 'I would like 3 firewods 1 food and 1 water we stay up late and need extra firewood'
Utterance: 'Oh thats expensive .There's too much cold out here and thats our major package for survival '
[A]:
Yes