In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: toxic and non-toxic. Toxicity is defiend as anything that is rude, disrespectful, or unreasonable that would make someone want to leave a converation.

Example Input: Comment: I think it interesting they include this picture of the Grand Canyon in the above advertorial for the National Park Service budget process and hate targeting Trump.
Because, if you really look at that picture, you'll realize you could take it without the need to spend a single penny to the National Park Service, or anyone else except the camera manufacturer.
It's the Park Service that puts up the barriers for people to get to a place like that.
It's the Park Service that requires you to stand in line to pay money.
It's the Park Service that denies access if you don't pay (them).
When I was young I went pretty much any where I wanted at any time. 
Now I'm old & am told I have to buy a pass to pay people who deny what I used to do.
Brave New World, eh? No. Same old story, though you can substitute a different word.
Example Output: Non-toxic

Example Input: Comment: Kamala "prosecute climate change deniers" Harris is not fit for high office. As CalifornAG she refused to defend initiatives the voters approved, refusing to do her job. She has a feeble mind and no positive accomplishments to speak of. She is just another member of the misguided lefty personality cult, so the idiots want to make her president. #Estupidos
Example Output: Toxic

Example Input: Comment: Idiot level 9,000.
Example Output:
Toxic