The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.

Input: Consider Input: Context: 'Hmm. Maybe we could go out together on a run. 🙂Always nice to have a running partner. So maybe on the water you get 2, me 1. Then on the Firewood the opposite?' 'That would be fun! I feel like I always do better when I have someone to run against.  Competition does me good. That sounds fantastic on the fire wood and water split.  What is your food situation looking like??' 'How about this? 2 for you and 1 for me. Going low carb and mostly brought my own. What do you think? '
Utterance: 'That sounds great! I don't think my chances for catching any fish are pretty slim!'

Output: No


Input: Consider Input: Context: 'Splitting the food is what I was thinking as well, but I'd also like to split the firewood. We can split the water or I'm fine taking all of that.' 'I would be willing to take 2 firewood, 3 food, and 1 water if that would work for you.  ' 'Hmm I think I should take 2 food, 1 firewood, and 3 water. What do you think?'
Utterance: 'Is your first priority the water?  I'm definitely willing to split up by what is most important to us both.'

Output: No


Input: Consider Input: Context: 'Hello! I'll be camping soon and need to get my hands on some supplies. The food is what I need the most.'
Utterance: 'I'm glad you are joining the camp! I will be bringing my girl scout troop for some badge earning opportunities.'


Output: No