In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

Input: Consider Input: Comment: Mr. Trump repeatedly exposes himself as a crude, crass misogynistic lout.  To note that those are unattractive characteristics in a Presidential candidate doesn't constitute "character assassination."  If you're not bothered by his values, that's your choice.  If you actually share his misogynistic view of women, that's your choice.  

Your defense of Trump is pathetic....the old "hey, everybody does it" sounds like a plea to a Junior High School vice principal.  No, Dun., not everybody is as crude and crass as Donald Trump.  
I know hundreds of men and, over my 74 years I've never been around someone who has made comments like Mr. Trump's.  

He's surrounded by sycophants (that's PC for #@$#kissers) so those comments have been accepted and reinforced.  The man is pathetic....but, that hardly qualifies him to be president.  He's embarrassing enough as a candidate.  It's simply unthinkable that he could be president.

Output: Non-identity-attack


Input: Consider Input: Comment: Yes, white people who stick up for themselves are so terrible. I mean we should should just roll over and accept this new Liberalized world full of weakness and defeat in the name of tolerance.

Output: Identity-attack


Input: Consider Input: Comment: come on, anyone is far more electable than wynnie! and better for ontario! to try and say we should stay liberal is trolling nonsense. brown is winning clearly, latest polls have pc's at 41.3, libs at 27.1 and ndp at 25.9, its over mr liberal troll.


Output: Non-identity-attack