Given a document, find the main entity about whom the author is writing. Write the full name if mentioned in the text. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

Example Input: There's  no question that Chicago police detective Dante Servin killed Rekia Boyd when he fired five shots at a group of people in a dark West Side alley .  The question  is whether  his  actions were justified because  he  had a reasonable fear that  his  life was in danger.
We'll never know the answer  because Cook County Judge Dennis Porter got stuck on a different question: Should  Servin  have been charged with a more serious crime than involuntary manslaughter?
 Servin 's trial ended Monday with a directed verdict of not guilty because Porter decided prosecutors had aimed too low.
 Servin  was off duty and in  his  personal car when  he  got in a shouting match with the group in March 2012.  His  lawyers say  he  drew  his  gun and fired when Antonio Cross pulled an object from  his  waistband and pointed it at  Servin .  Boyd  was hit in the back of the head.  She  died two days later.  She  was 22.
After three days of testimony  Porter abruptly ended  Servin 's bench trial. He said prosecutors had shown "beyond a reasonable doubt" that Servin killed  Boyd   and that the officer fired the shots knowing they were likely to cause great bodily harm or death. Those elements would add up to first-degree murder  the judge said  unless  Servin  could prove he acted in self defense. But  Servin  never had to make that case.
Another look at  the Dante Servin verdict . (WGN TV) Another look at  the Dante Servin verdict . (WGN TV) SEE MORE VIDEOS
To win a conviction on the involuntary manslaughter charge  prosecutors needed to prove that  Servin  acted recklessly — without regard for the risks.
 Servin  couldn't be convicted of first-degree murder because  he  was charged with involuntary manslaughter. And  he  couldn't be convicted of involuntary manslaughter  Porter said  because there was no evidence of reckless behavior.
The appellate courts said the evidence supported a first-degree murder conviction and the defendants weren't entitled to be tried on a less serious charge. Their convictions were upheld.  Servin 's outcome turns that on  its  head.
We asked around and found some attorneys who agreed with Porter's reasoning and some who didn't. It's not subject to appeal  because  Servin  was found not guilty. The case is over.
 Servin  did not help matters with  his  comments to reporters after the verdict.  He  repeated  his  contention that Boyd's death was an accident — let's be clear   the judge  said no such thing — and said  he  was lucky not to be "a police death statistic."
"Antonio Cross is a would-be cop killer  and that's all I have to say "  Servin  said.
 Servin  was making an off-duty burger run in  his  personal car when the confrontation occurred.  He  was not putting  his  life on the line to serve and protect.
Cross is not a would-be cop killer.  His  "weapon" turned out to be a cell phone. An aggravated assault charge against  him  was dropped in March 2013  the same day the city agreed to a $4.5 million wrongful death settlement with Boyd's relatives.
Example Output: Dante Servin

Example Input: But  Pat Robertson  doesn’t see it that way. In  his  mind  this nation’s unfolding tragedy is a direct fault of people who don’t respect Donald Trump and the American flag enough. Yes  really.
What are Pat Robertson’s possible motives here? While people still fought for their lives after the deadliest mass shooting in modern American history  why did a televangelist feel the need to issue a statement this useless? He wasn’t trying to provide comfort. He wasn’t helping to make sense of the tragedy  because his thoughts here are violently stupid.
Robertson wasn’t trying to be helpful. He was trying to insert himself into a story that had nothing to do with him. He couldn’t help it. He can never help it. Because  Pat Robertson is an evil man .  He ’s been so evil for so long that one has to wonder whose side  he ’s on.
Let’s do a quick topline comparison between Satan  the Prince of Darkness  and Pat Robertson  the Prince of Doddering.
 Robertson  has spent decades lying and obfuscating  throwing  himself  into the middle of discussions in which  he  wasn’t invited  to offer opinions that nobody wanted.  He ’s weighed in on the Iraq War  9/11  sex outside of marriage  Hinduism  the earthquake in Haiti  abortion  and every other topic du jour  tragic or zeitgeist  that can help boost Pat Robertson Awareness.  He ’s thrown  his  fortunes in with warlords  hucksters  and profiteers.
 He ’s claimed  he  can leg-press 2 000 pounds  thanks to the aid of a protein shake.
 Pat Robertson  has built a billion-dollar empire by saying  he ’s a person who knows what God wants other people to do. As host of The 700 Club   he ’s spent thousands of hours on the bleakest television channel preaching to  his  followers about how they can emulate  Jesus   how they can send him money in an extremely holy way. Meanwhile  he has lived a life of wealth and privilege  at the expense of dupes.
What  Robertson  has said about Las Vegas is so much worse than  his  usual praying for attention.  He ’s rebranding cruelty as sanctimony  nastiness as wisdom.  He ’s the answer to the question “What Wouldn’t Jesus Do?”
What’s the difference between  Pat Robertson  and Satan? Satan’s not real. Unfortunately   Pat Robertson  is.
Example Output: Pat Robertson

Example Input: F. William McNabb  Vanguard Groupâs chairman   cautioned investors to consider reducing their stock exposure before the nearly 9-year-old rally ends.
âWe would expect the next decade to actually be very modest on the equities side in the U.S.  a little less so in Europe and a little less so in Asia â  McNabb  said in a Bloomberg Television interview that aired Thursday. âBut itâs still overall lower than long-term historical averages.â
 McNabb  whose firm oversees about $5 trillion   said long-term investors may benefit by holding balanced portfolios with bonds as well as stocks.
âNo one can predict whatâs going to happen in the next 12 months â  he  said. âHaving just said that  Iâm sure the equity market will continue to skyrocket for the next few months.â
Example Output:
F. William McNabb