Categorize the comment on the basis of obscenity. If the comment is obscene output Yes, otherwise output No.

Q: Nobody seems to know who authorized the filing of this futile appeal?  Sailing into troubled waters and captained by fools!

A: Yes
****
Q: So the Legislature feels obligated to buy the building because they feel guilty. The only obligation you have is to the people of Alaska to go with the least expensive of the options. Apparently that obligation is less important when you aren't a major donor to political campaigns.

A: No
****
Q: I cannot believe this!!!  The lease was declared illegal and invalid.  If the state bought the LIO "The annual loss to the city would be about $260,000, which would be divided among other taxpayers."  AND they would still have to figure out HOW to pay for it.......uh, divide it among other taxpayers???   Stevens really takes the cake with his moronic comment -- “I know it’s going to piss everyone off,” he said. “But what have we done this year that hasn’t pissed everyone off?"  Oh, so the answer is to just keep pissing people off???  How many more "cons" need to be put on the list before these guys see that this is not a good deal?  Walk away from it and let the landlord be stuck with it, lets see if he can find someone else to convince this is a good deal.  The LIO will always have this black mark on it and so will the landlords.  Their names are trash in Alaska now.

A:
Yes
****