Categorize the comment on the basis of severe toxicity. If the comment is severely toxic output Yes, otherwise output No.

[Q]: It is an excellent opportunity to show just how deluded professor Khé’s comments on homelessness are, and why we have the axiom PhD= piling high deeper BS. I would gladly trade homeless for homeless. India's homeless poverty would come to America, find jobs their first day, and rise from poverty whereas our homeless will continue to remain homeless leeching off others in India.
[A]: No


[Q]: What "crushing loss"?  Did you see the same New York Primary as I did?  Hillary netted about 31 delegates...and that's with scores of thousands of voters getting disenfranchised by the New York Board of Elections, the great majority of whom were recent registrants, and therefore, likely Sanders voters!

There are still some 1,400 pledged delegates yet to earn...and the primary season itself doesn't end for nearly three more months!  "Crushing loss" indeed.  Cut the crap already!
[A]: Yes


[Q]: Imposing stricter building codes requiring more materials in structures will exasperate global warming through the consumption of additional materials and the fuels needed to produce them.  Nice try to promote code mandated construction products through connection to global warming.
[A]:
No