TASK DEFINITION: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.
PROBLEM: However when a militia group makes the news, these same anti-gunners are quick to paint them as dangerous, anti-government, and even racist extremists, and an example of why gun control needs to be further tightened.

SOLUTION: Valid

PROBLEM: That most people can't be trusted, so we should have more laws against guns, which most people will abide by because they can be trusted.

SOLUTION: Valid

PROBLEM: Gun hater pilot logic is for companies and governments to deny a person the right to bears arms to defend ones self then not be held responsible when these companies and governments fail to protect the unarmed citizens!

SOLUTION:
Valid