The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the no-need strategy, otherwise output No. no-need is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used when a participant points out that they do not need an item based on personal context such as suggesting that they have ample water to spare. no-need can directly benefit the opponent since it implies that the item is up for grabs.

Input: Consider Input: Context: 'Okay, let's do that, and then split the food. Since there are only 3, do you want to flip a coin to see who gets 2 of those?' 'That sounds fair, how much food do you feel you need? ' 'I would prefer 2 because it's really easy to underestimate how much I could need.'
Utterance: 'That's fine, I'll take 1. I think I have enough with what was originally given. '

Output: Yes


Input: Consider Input: Context: 'I could give you 1 water for 1 firewood, most of my firewood got wet so is almost useless . Would you perhaps except some food for another unit of firewood?' 'Oh. Let do some deal. If you give me all water bottles I will give you 2 firewood. Can you accept this' 'i could give you 2 water bottles and 3 food if you can do 3 firewood'
Utterance: 'OK. Are you need Extra food packages?'

Output: No


Input: Consider Input: Context: 'Hi, I need the all food package. I will frequently feel hungry' 'I can give you two of the packages if you're willing to give me all 3 of the firewood. I left mine out in the rain a couple of nights ago so its all ruined.' 'If I will give 2 firewood for you and I will take all the food package with 2 water.'
Utterance: 'I need all 3 firewood! But I'm willing to discuss food with you. I have a lot of that.'


Output: Yes