TASK DEFINITION: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.
PROBLEM: Comment: What people are reacting to is the suggestion from productions like this  that white people are bad and are guilty of a never ending litany of atrocities against every group conceivable and the fact that this concept is perpetuated by this program and  people like you at virtually every opportunity. Sanctimonious articles like this where you portray yourself as some kindred spirit to the multitude of victims of white privilege and will apologize on behalf of the whole race is nauseating. The moto should be "check your self loathing", or "check your white guilt."

SOLUTION: Identity-attack

PROBLEM: Comment: The representatives of the government in power should be in the position, all things being equal, to offer appointments and positions at its disposal as it thinks fit.  If there is a law against it doing so, that law should be abolished.  If a government cannot use patronage appointments in the open to smooth its agenda then it will do so in the shadows.  Of course a government that uses patronage appointments recklessly, putting someone in a position where he/she is in over their head, will sooner or later be recognized as incompetent will have to face the consequences.  Governments should be allowed to act foolishly, essentially against their own long term best interests, in this regard.  That's one of the reasons we have elections; to get rid of foolish, incompetent governments.

SOLUTION: Non-identity-attack

PROBLEM: Comment: Why wouldn't he blame both sides? It takes two to tango. Boy the media is really slipping into the deep end. They want to create a civil war for ratings with all those lies and bias.

SOLUTION:
Non-identity-attack