The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.

[EX Q]: Context: 'Would I be able to take 2 firewood and 3 waters and then you take the res?' 'Yes' 'It sounds like we are going to have a really good weekend!  I'm pumped up!  We'll have enough firewood to keep warm, lots of water, and food as well!'
Utterance: 'Excellent'
[EX A]: No

[EX Q]: Context: 'if u had hungry means what will u do. u need food. right. hehehe' 'I'm willing to give more food to you in exchange for more water since not everybody in my group eats a lot. How about this: I take 2 waters, 1 food, 1 firewood and you can get everything else?' 'ok i accept  ur thoughts.sharing is good habit'
Utterance: 'Perfect 🙂 I think that sounds like a good deal for both of us!'
[EX A]: No

[EX Q]: Context: 'I need an extra supply of food, as I exercise a lot! 🙂' 'Hmmm.  And the firewood?' 'I get cold easily. I need the firewood to get warm. I might catch a cold.🙂'
Utterance: 'I think water should be your priority.  You have food and firewood also in your basics.  I will let you have the 3 water but I will need the 3 Firewood and the 3 Food.  I have a medical condition.'
[EX A]:
No