TASK DEFINITION: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
PROBLEM: when you have 60% of the vote, they hurt themselves. This wasn't about preventing democrats from voting. This was about trying to cut spending, period. Many republicans do not grasp this is not where you cut funding for lesser government. Long lines didn't just happen in Phoenix, and I highly doubt that city is primarily democrat. If it is, that's because of all the snow birds who go there seasonally from the nation, but cannot vote in elections.

SOLUTION: No

PROBLEM: Unitarians are a fabulous lot, but why are they and the like minded churches so small? Even here in far-left Portland. And I'm voting for Bernie, just so you know. But as someone friendly to liberal religion I can say this, everyone bashing Jules or Imago on here is basically sounding like a single issue voter, and scarily given to group think. What if some people do think marriage is between a man and a woman? Big deal. You don't have to go to their church. (Interestingly, gays didn't seem too concerned about not being able to marry until fairly recently, but that's not my point) But to compare the fight for gay marriage to King's fight for racial justice is ludicrous. No one is better off, in any significant way, because the state of Oregon has approved their union. Blacks on the other hand, are vastly better off after the civil rights movement.
By the way, no one is accusing the church or Jules of being anti-minority.

SOLUTION: Yes

PROBLEM: Wish I could have been there!  I'm 64 and haven't been this motivated by a candidate since I was in my teens (when I couldn't vote).  Feeling the Bern!

SOLUTION:
No