In this task, you're given reviews from Amazon's food products and a summary of that review. Your task is to classify whether the given summary matches the original review. Generate "True" if the given review and its summary match, otherwise generate "False".

[Q]: Reviews: The back of the case is nice, slicker than I thought which is fine, still comfortable, but the overall materials (rubber/plastic casing) is pretty flimsy. Though the most important feature, the lip for the glass screen, is just too short by a mm or 2. So, if you use a glass screen protector, like zagg, when putting phone face down, you will be sitting on the glass, not on the case's lip. Also, I dont believe that if this phone was dropped that it would actually do much for protection. I was under the impression this would be a bit more rigid, like incipio or incase. Full edge shock protection is quite a stretch. 
 Summary: They look ok but cheap and they already lost the ...
[A]: False


[Q]: Reviews: Will be returning this one. I couldn't make strong enough coffee, even after filling the basket to the top, compacting the grounds, and using a fine espresso grind. I wasn't looking for coffee you can stand a fork up in, just something that didn't taste watery. Tried for 3 days, using more and more grounds and it didn't seem to make much difference. I really wanted to like this machine. It looks very nice, everything about the coffee maker is well made and of high quality material. It brews at the perfect temperature, unfortunately since the heating element shuts off after 20 minutes you would have to pour it into a secondary vacuum carafe to keep it hot for any length of time. 
 Summary: A contrived, disjointed sermon, in amateur movie format
[A]: False


[Q]: Reviews: I didn't expect it to be so soft, kind of defeats the purpose and makes it less comfortable honestly. 
 Summary: This should be called a kitten tree, a cat is much too big to use it
[A]:
False