instruction:
We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.
question:
Sent1: In other words the Miller case interpreted the Second Amendment to mean one has the right to own militia type weapons.
 Sent2: In the Miller case, the court essentially ruled that the second ammendment does indeed convey an individual right, but that the right in question is dependant on the type of weapon (i.e must be suitable for military use).
answer:
Similar


question:
Sent1: Do you have anything to offer from King on guns, or for that matter, the 2nd.
 Sent2: You're right that gun control isn't about guns, however, but 'control' is a secondary matter, a means to an end.
answer:
Not similar


question:
Sent1: All gun free zones can do, is keep law-abiding citizens from having guns.
 Sent2: Criminals enter gun free zones with guns to commit crimes against unarmed law-abiding citizens.
answer:

Similar