We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

[Q]: Sent1: If someone is bad enough to be considered for the death penalty then they must have had sure evidence that they are guilty if they are then they shouldn't deserve the right to live among people they could kill
 Sent2: Capital punishment is killing someone as a punishment for a crime they committed.
[A]: Not similar


[Q]: Sent1: The question with the death penalty is not kill or give no punishment.
 Sent2: God specifically gives the government permission to punish murderers by death.
[A]: Not similar


[Q]: Sent1: Why is that not a completely contrived, arbitrary excuse to act just as bad as the criminal?
 Sent2: Saying the death penalty is a justified method of punishment for a crime just because the criminal is a killer himself is a completely contrived reason.
[A]:
Not similar