In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: insult and non-insult. Insult is any lanugage or act that is disrespectful or scornfully abusive.

Input: Consider Input: Comment: Billy Ray Powers:  Most folks are knowledgeable about the wonderful Russian folks we have visited in Russia, and know here in Alaska.  We know you support Donald J. Trump along with many other Alaskans.  Your guy won... woo hoo for you and his faithful supporters! 

The Russians have a government, Putin is a former KGB guy...they are messing into our election process and no one is saying their involvement is why Trump won.  Trump has agreed that the USA deserves to elect someone without Russia or other  outside interference.

Output: Non-insult


Input: Consider Input: Comment: This may be a case of very painful cultural memories overriding all other considerations.  The people of Eastern Europe were raped and plundered by the Germans, the Austrians, the Russians, and the Turks for several centuries.

Output: Non-insult


Input: Consider Input: Comment: From Paproki's July 9 column:

"[C]anon law prohibits ecclesiastical funeral rites only in cases of 'manifest sinners' which gives 'public scandal,' and something such as using birth control is a private matter that is usually not manifest or made public." 

Need to bone up on manifest sinner?

Catholic.org defines it as he/she who "pigheadedly continues to 'persist' or 'stand firm' in grave sin that is 'public' in nature." If this isn't explicit enough, Catholic.org offers this image: ". . .  manifest, obstinate, persistent sinners such as homosexual couples approaching the Eucharist arm-in-arm or with sodomite rainbow banners over their shoulders . . . "

But what if you're dead? Clearly, it's not merely dead but really most obstinately and pigheadedly dead.


Output: Non-insult