In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.
--------
Question: Comment: I think you ought to review the data on primaries. Sanders has won total of 19 state contests...most of his wins were in states that do not have primaries. Instead, like Alaska, they have caucuses. In Alaska, less than 550 people participated in the Democratic caucuses. There are apartment complexes in Anchorage with more people than that. Where everyone actually gets a chance to vote in primaries Clinton has won overwhelmingly. That is why she has more than 3,000,000 more votes than Sanders. You are entitled too your own opinions, but not your own facts.

Answer: Non-sexual-explicit


Question: Comment: It's unfortunate that you only interact with women with whom you pay to perform sex.  The woman who resides in the White House is a whore (a profession with which you seem quite familiar).  She received payment for marrying the offensive ogre that many consider our president.  Now, that we understand your limited intellectual abilities, shut the fuck up!

Answer: Sexual-explicit


Question: Comment: First off, none of our greatest presidents directly created jobs in the private sector. I suggest you look into Trump's Atlantic City casino bankruptcy before you generalize. His other ones don't fit any clever business strategy, either, unless it's sticking investors with millions of dollars of losses. In bashing the workers that actually lost their jobs, you forgot the wealthy guys who actually invested in the huckster and paid heavy prices for it. 
I'd love to read an example--- not Glenn Beck/Limbaugh innuendo and character assassination--- of Hillary's "corruption." We know Trump is morally corrupt: 3 divorces; a serial womanizer and adulterer. And that he gouged hundreds of trusting investors. These are facts.
Let's see your facts proving Hillary's alleged lack of character.

Answer:
Non-sexual-explicit