In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.

[EX Q]: Comment: .
Over all it has been a good year for the Trudeau Liberals. What-ever "irregularities" the opposition came up with on the "fund raising" file are redundant since it was done legally very much as it was done legally by the Harper Conservatives 100's of times over.

The one positive Mr. Martin forgot/omitted to mention; Trudeau  scrapped the majority of Harper's insidious/egregious legislation. That alone makes this a great year for the Trudeau Liberals.
.
[EX A]: Disagree

[EX Q]: Comment: The Russians' murderous rampage in Syria, with thug Putin once again attacking, has resulted in little reaction from the civilized world. This is one death that is understandable under the circumstances.  
Canadians and all our representative political parties detest Putin and his cohorts.
[EX A]: Disagree

[EX Q]: Comment: The overwhelming majority of Canadians supported not allowing Jewish refugees in the 1930s. I think opinion have changed since then. 

As for the niqab, I agree that it is in violation of the Canadian belief system. So are Amish or Mennonite values. But I don't have a problem with how those communities behave.

Finally, how many of these regressive countries have you visited? Or has your knowledge been gathered from provocateurs like Margaret, or news channels like Fox and Breitbart?
[EX A]:
Disagree