In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

Sentence: Dan took the rear seat while Bill claimed the front because his "Dibs!" was slow.
 Reason: The 'his' refers to dan because if your dibs are slow you are more likely to take the unwanted back seat. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Correct

Sentence: Jackson was greatly influenced by Arnold, though he lived two centuries later.
 Reason: The 'he' refers to jackson because arnold was influencing jackson because he lived two centuries earlier. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Correct

Sentence: Sam broke both his ankles and he's walking with crutches. But a month or so from now they should be unnecessary.
 Reason: The 'they' refers to the crutches because It actually refers to the crutches because his ankles will still be neccessary. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

Correct