The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the self-need strategy, otherwise output No. self-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to create a personal need for an item in the negotiation, such as by pointing out that the participant sweats a lot to show preference towards water packages.
--------
Question: Context: 'The weather is going to be really hot. Could I have 2 water in exchange for you receiving 2 food and 2 firewood?' 'I have a low immune system and need to stay warm how about I get all 3 firewood in exchange for the 2 water. ' 'I will agree to 3 firewood for 2 water. Maybe I should extra food though so 2 food for me🙂'
Utterance: 'I can agree to 2 food. You get 2 and I will get 1 food. That sounds fair to me. 🙂'

Answer: No


Question: Context: 'okay how about if i only get 2 food packages and i give you 2 firewood. So we both gets something to help us/ Because i to at least 1 firewood' 'That would work for me if I get all 3 water still' 'How about you get 2 of the waters an i would take 1 of them? I need some water to stay hydrated '
Utterance: 'If you get two foods then I need more items overall'

Answer: No


Question: Context: 'I need the water to drink - I don't trust the water I might find at the campsite.' 'Did you bring any water to start?' 'Yes! Did you bring any food to start?'
Utterance: 'I did, but my friend only feels comfortable with extra around, God forbid, if something happens this could save his life. So I'm thinking, I take all three food packages, two firewood packages and leave all three water and one firewood for you. '

Answer:
No