instruction:
In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.
question:
Comment: It'll be interesting to see how this plays out.  In a rational world, owners/stockholders/league would have promptly and ruthlessly enforced a "no politics on the playing field" rule, left or right.  They didn't, and now they're pointedly choosing sides.  I suspect, they should've taken a hard look at an electoral map first.  They need Trump supporters, far more than Trump supporters need them.  Pro sports is business and entertainment, first and last.  First rule...don't alienate your customers.  Second rule...don't start crap, where there doesn't need to be crap.  They're failing at both rules.
answer:
Obscene


question:
Comment: Obama failed in closing Guantanamo Bays prison, after two full terms. Was it his Bay of Pigs and did he learn? A question rarely asked and never answered. But hey, lets give him a Nobel and call it good!
answer:
Non-obscene


question:
Comment: "Terrorism is a modest, immediate threat to the United States." Tell that to the 911, Boston Marathon, and San Bernardino families. The writer is a racist, blaming Jews. Shame on the RG for allowing this Holocaust-supporting writer to express his hatred.
answer:

Non-obscene