We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Ex Input:
Sent1: Only .06% of people who have killed kill again when they escape, are released, etc.
 Sent2: The government does not have the right to kill people.

Ex Output:
Not similar


Ex Input:
Sent1: Some innocent people are still sentenced to death, and that's where I see a problem.
 Sent2: A perfect judiciary system would not sentence innocent people, and would alleviate all problems with the death penalty.

Ex Output:
Not similar


Ex Input:
Sent1: The jury sees partially false evidence which has been biased by a lawyer and the emotions of the family members, and then convicts an innocent person and sentence him to death.
 Sent2: A life sentence can be reversed if th convicted individual is later found innocent by new evidence.

Ex Output:

Not similar