In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Input: Consider Input: Comment: emotional support animal?  what's wrong with the word "pet?"  

horseshit.

Output: Obscene


Input: Consider Input: Comment: Money whores, greedy money grubbing whores.

Output: Obscene


Input: Consider Input: Comment: J.Bob, I think many Christians have a problem with homosexuality, though I don't think it is a majority.  

The problem is when a Christian, for reasons of his/her belief, refuses to bake a cake or provide a venue or issue a marriage license for a LGBT weddings, when they purport to provide those goods or services to the general public.  Or when they won't hire people from a particular group .  At one time, many of these Christians also refused to provide their services to non-Caucasian people and they believed it was moral and right.  There was a time it was perfectly legal for an ad for a job to note:  Catholics need not apply.  What is different in attitude if the issue is LGBT people?

I grew up in the segregated South during the 1950s and 1960s.  I have seen and lived with how a majority can band together and make life miserable for a minority.  This is the same song, just a different verse.


Output: Non-obscene