In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Example Input: Comment: Because a gunman murdered six Muslims at prayer. Or were you forgetting that?
Example Output: Non-obscene

Example Input: Comment: That's a nice story, except that it's not true.  I was very surprised when I heard Kershaw wasn't starting.  Like I said, Darvish looked like crap in game 3, and his eyes looked lost.  No way I would have started him in a game 7 with Kershaw available.  And again, the metrics on Darvish vs. the Astros are pretty astounding.  Frankly, I wouldn't even have put Darvish on the roster for the WS, given his history with the Astros.
Example Output: Obscene

Example Input: Comment: You're trying to scrape down even lower into the barrel than usual.  The confederacy was a sorry collection of traitors, murderers and criminals.  Treason and murder are rarely celebrated with statuary.  

Many of those monuments were erected during Jim Crow days, to protest forced integration of schools and other similar issues.  It's entertaining to watch you defend Nazis and racists.  Is anything beneath you?  Anything?
Example Output:
Non-obscene