In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence can be inferred from the statement. Incorrect choices change the meaning in important ways or have details that are not mentioned in the statement. Indicate your answer as 1,2, or 3 corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.

Input: Consider Input: Statement: Anyone who knew Tony Lukas even slightly was deeply impressed by his boundless, open-minded curiosity about the injustices of modern life, along with his stubborn reportorial integrity about getting to the very bottom of any story as best he could. Choices:  1. Tony Lukas was an elitist.  2. People who knew Tony Lukas were impressed by his curiosity and integrity in the news field.  3. Tony Lukas was open minded, curious and stubborn. 

Output: 2


Input: Consider Input: Statement: This time, they were looking for a candidate who knew how to speak the language of love. Choices:  1. The candidate who loves will be a huge inspiration to all. 2. There is no room for a candidate who knows how to love. 3. The language of love was a quality the candidate should be fluent in.

Output: 3


Input: Consider Input: Statement: HUD promulgated the Amendments to Regulation X under the notice and comment procedures of 5 U.S.C. Choices:  1. HUD checks and modifies amendments as is needed. 2. Regulation X will not have its amendments promulgated by HUD. 3. The amendments to regulation X were promulgated by HUD.


Output: 3