Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.

[Q]: "Tim," you clearly know little about law.  No on is "on trial" in a civil suit.  Brown brought the claims and had a burden of proof.  Hutchinson filed affirmative defenses.  One of the issues, beyond "truth," was whether Brown's reputation was damaged, and so much of the evidence related to Brown's reputation as a peeper.  And yes, four women testified that they woke up to Mr. Brown engaging them in sex; since sleeping people cannot consent, the conduct they testified about is unquestionably rape.
[A]: Yes


[Q]: My grandpa was a sparky for years, both union and non union. His last 15 years was union, working on the then new tall buildings in Phoenix. I used to go union meetings with him. The hall (it really was a hall a big one)  would be packed with well over a hundred or more men. They'd talk about issues, and then vote on one or two them. He always worked, sometimes overseas, and was treated well.
[A]: No


[Q]: This is a wonderful event!
 
Despite comments by a few "cranks," Hillary has spent a lifetime dedicated to improving people's lives, not just sitting on the sidelines taking potshots.

I am proud of her and what she's accomplished. I'm proud that we Democrats selected her as our candidate.

I also note that when she lost the primaries to Obama in 2008, she was gracious in defeat and closed ranks quickly to ensure his election.

Sanders on the other hand, appears to be playing some pathetic version of "grumpy old man as cult hero."

Shows a real lack of grace on his part.

-- Paul
[A]:
No