We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

[Q]: Sent1: The death penalty is not deterrance for the person executed.
 Sent2: Peterson could face the death penalty or life without parole.
[A]: Not similar


[Q]: Sent1: So what does he have to do with a debate like this about murderers and the death penalty?
 Sent2: C: The main CON argument against capital punishment is that he should have second chance.
[A]: Not similar


[Q]: Sent1: If we continue to allow the death penalty, we are no better than the murderers and rapists that we punish with the death penalty.
 Sent2: If the death penalty were an adequate deterrent then we would not have murder.
[A]:
Not similar