In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.
--------
Question: Comment: All these gays have to do is make some medical complaint and say that they need to have a sex change to resolve their problem...yes, implants, hormone supply, drug maintenance for the sex change, etc., will be paid by the military.  They will even pull out all of your teeth is you have a complaint and have implants done if that makes the service person feel and perform better.

Me, too, only a tax payer and guys like our AG, senators and reps will oppose Trump no matter if it is the wrong thing to do.

Liberals will bring down the USA!

Answer: Identity-attack


Question: Comment: I can't stand these complaining immigrants.  They think everyone needs to bend to everything of theirs.  Disgusting ungrateful people who should think if they want to return to their home country.  I don't have the easiest name, so I bend sometimes.  What's the big deal.  All the Chinese take anglicized names in school, work etc. while retaining their legal names.  I really hate these ungrateful people like this writer.  This is a personal issue for me, and the writer sounds like a despicable man.

Answer: Identity-attack


Question: Comment: "How about people try raising their children themselves for a change."
From the Centre for Science and Democracy:
"Soda and other sweetened beverages top the list [of advertising], with the top 10 companies [in U.S.] spending over $1 billion on beverage advertising alone." 
"Children are targets of nearly a quarter of the food industry's advertising budget. Research has shown that they particularly vulnerable to sugar advertising: they are more receptive to sweet tastes than adults."
How can Mom and Dad, or Junior, tell what is good for them when industry spends hundreds of millions of dollars to convince them to consume sugar when the continent is rife with obesity and diabetes. 
Oliver is not being an "idiot," as you suggest. Cigarette taxes went up when we understood how taxpayers were paying for the massive health-care costs of users of that product. The same logic should apply to sugar.

Answer:
Non-identity-attack