Given a sentence, an entity and its sentiment towards the entity, verify if it is the correct sentiment towards the entity. Answer should be yes or no. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

[EX Q]: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Juliet Jacobsen is Negative . When a doctorâs message moves abruptly from "everything's great" to "she's dying  " Jacobsen  said  patients and their families don't have enough time to adjust to the bad news.
[EX A]: no

[EX Q]: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Alison Friedman is Neutral . Comstockâs campaign pointed out that most of  Friedmanâs  money has come from donors in California.
[EX A]: no

[EX Q]: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Samantha Bee is Positive . This is imbecilic. Let’s say I constructed a list  called “S***y Human Beings.” On that list were three people: Hitler  Charles Manson  and  Samantha Bee . Now  I think  Samantha Bee  seems like a rather s****y human being  but I’m obviously not saying that  she ’s a mass murderer. But  she  might be miffed to be placed in that company. The #MeToo movement has set no limits on what ought to be a career-ending or career-affecting offense. That’s not the fault of men. And it’s not even the fault of most women who find the #MeToo movement inspirational. It’s the fault of people like  Samantha Bee  who make excuses for conflation  then suggest that no conflation has taken place.
[EX A]:
no