In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: insult and non-insult. Insult is any lanugage or act that is disrespectful or scornfully abusive.

Q: Comment: "We're blunt and tell you right to your face what's going to happen."

Rip off our noses and pull out our hair?

A: Non-insult
****
Q: Comment: Donal Trump is simply pathetic.

A: Insult
****
Q: Comment: That women cannot be ordained is wholly about misogyny. They used to be honest about it, Thomas Aquinas in the Summa Theologica Supplement, q 39 art 1 considers the question, "Whether the female sex is an impediment to receiving Orders?". He says that it is, for two reasons. The first is that women are inferior to men ("since it is not possible in the female sex to signify eminence of degree, for a woman is in the state of subjection, it follows that she cannot receive the sacrament of Orders"). The second is that the tonsure is inappropriate for women.

Now they say that the inferiority of women is not an acceptable argument, while still hanging on to it, using words such as "complementarity" and "ontological differences". But it's still the same old tripe about the inferiority of women.

A:
Non-insult
****