Categorize the comment on the basis of severe toxicity. If the comment is severely toxic output Yes, otherwise output No.

Ex Input:
No.  "Racist" means racist.

Ex Output:
No


Ex Input:
Actually that is exactly the fourth and latest excuse Lisa sent me as to why she was opposed to giving Merrick Garland the traditional hearings and votes for SCOTUS. She said that as Chair of a Committee she had to respect Chairman Grassley's obstructionist refusal to hold Judiciary hearings. Right? Doesn't matter if the Chairman is working contrary to historic Congressional norms in her eyes, all that matters is that he is a Chairman. Sort of like how she supports the ludicrously unqualified Trump simply because he is the Republican nominee. Party over country over and over again for Murkowski.

Ex Output:
No


Ex Input:
Hmmm,  you giveaway tax money to the oil companies in SB 21 then you strip education and the old peoples money from them then you want to buy a 35 million Dollar building downtown and now you want to tax the PFD?!?! How about you go get the money back from the oil companies that you gave away, you don't buy that building that you don't need, then you cut your own salary is 50% before you start trying to tax other people.
GOP= OLD WHITE UNEDUCATED MEN!!!!!!

Ex Output:

Yes