In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: threat and non-threat. Threat is a statement that someone will be hurt or harmed, especially if the person does not do something in particular.

[EX Q]: Comment: First, any Breitbart article should be deemed suspect. Second, the author clearly misunderstood what Francis was saying. He was not saying that there are no Muslim terrorists, he was saying that there is no such thing as "Muslim terrorism", any more than there is "Christian terrorism".
[EX A]: Non-threat

[EX Q]: Comment: Ah, I don't know about the "far left" [am somewhat unsure what/who you're referring to] but my remark had little to do with "the more popular religions in the US", unless you consider religious sects that post large signs saying "If you worship the Earth, I spit on your Mother", publish comments such as: "Nuke them [Moslems] until they glow; then shoot them in the dark.", call for beheading infidels, or teach that nonbelievers should burn in hell, etc, etc, etc - as outstandingly popular in the US.  And I really don't believe that ANYONE [not even most heinous of the "Far Left"] is asking that the straight population "conform" to trans-gender people either - is that even possible?? I don't think so.
Just saying - replying to comment means so much more, if you reply to the comment that posted.
[EX A]: Threat

[EX Q]: Comment: "pharma bro" Shkreli, Weiner and soon HitLIARy. Lock them up! Lock them up! LOL
[EX A]:
Threat