We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.
--------
Question: Sent1: An argument regarding the death penalty should be confined to discussions regarding those who have been wrongly convicted and sentenced to death.
 Sent2: The debate question asks "Should the death penalty be legalized?"

Answer: Not similar


Question: Sent1: Some innocent people are still sentenced to death, and that's where I see a problem.
 Sent2: I would support the death penalty IF there was a way to ensure that it would not put innocent people to death.

Answer: Similar


Question: Sent1: As it is today, when someone murderers another, the death penalty is considered, as it should be.
 Sent2: As of yet, we have not seen fact one that even one innocent person has been put to death.

Answer:
Not similar