TASK DEFINITION: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the no-need strategy, otherwise output No. no-need is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used when a participant points out that they do not need an item based on personal context such as suggesting that they have ample water to spare. no-need can directly benefit the opponent since it implies that the item is up for grabs.
PROBLEM: Context: 
Utterance: 'hi  i was wondering if i could get 3 packages of firewood?'

SOLUTION: No

PROBLEM: Context: 'I agree, it will be tricky to find extra food while camping. I'm sure we can figure out something that works for both of us... the water is also very important to me because it's supposed to be hot. There is plenty of wood where I'm going, so you can have the firewood. Would you be willing to take 3 firewood, 1 food and 1 food?' 'I would like at least 2 food, how does me getting 2 food, 1 water,2 firewood sound?' 'I think I can only give away 2 food if you are willing to give up all of the water. How about you take 2 food and 2 firewood? '
Utterance: 'I think that sounds reasonable, i dont get too thirsty!'

SOLUTION: Yes

PROBLEM: Context: 'That's fine, I'll take 1. I think I have enough with what was originally given. ' 'Sounds good! So I get 3 firewood, 2 food, 0 water; you get 0 firewood, 1 food, 3 water?' 'That's sounds right. Thanks 🙂'
Utterance: 'Cool, I'

SOLUTION:
No