In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: threat and non-threat. Threat is a statement that someone will be hurt or harmed, especially if the person does not do something in particular.

Q: Comment: "wrong side of history"? Too bad my grandparents are no longer living. I'd love to see you try to convince them that Roosevelt didn't save the US from the Depression and didn't lead the nation out of WWII. My old Finnish Grandma would likely wallop you with her umbrella.

A: Threat
****
Q: Comment: Hahahaha. Now tell us PC spokesperson pretty please, did Ms. Ambrose make the calls to the ethics people after Trudeau's vacation event became public and and turned into a cheap political play? She would have to be awfully dumb if she did not. In addition to the hypocrisy the layer of parsing non existent differences is boggling.

A: Non-threat
****
Q: Comment: The old and washed up foreign money bag lady in the Salvation Army disco era pantsuit, who knows not the truth from a lie, with a bogus political sham marriage, to a hillbilly back-woods lawyer, will not and can not win this election in any way shape or form.

A:
Non-threat
****