In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

Example Input: Sentence: I stuck a pin through a carrot. When I pulled the pin out, it left a hole.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the pin because They stabbed the carrot. Logically a hole would be left. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Example Output: Correct

Example Input: Sentence: The large ball crashed right through the table because it was made of steel.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the large ball because the ball crashed through the table because the ball was made of steel. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Example Output: Correct

Example Input: Sentence: We went to the lake, because a shark had been seen at the ocean beach, so it was a safer place to swim.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the lake because of the shark's resemblance to a shark in the water, and the 'it' could also be. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Example Output:
Wrong