We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

Input: Consider Input: Given the dissenting opinions, in the future they can not reasonably argue (because their active-duty-militia-status argument failed so miserably) that there is no individual right to keep and bear arms suitable for collective defense.

Output: Valid


Input: Consider Input: Gun control laws do not affect criminals because criminals do not obey these laws.

Output: Valid


Input: Consider Input: I think the concerns are less in my corner of the globe, because there's only a few people who are permitted to carry guns here, usually uniformed people like the Police, Armaguard people and a number of other exceptions.


Output: Valid