In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Q: Comment: "Panty Dropper" is actually the problem, because yes, how would normalizing the idea that if you get women drunk they are easier to get into bed contribute to rape culture. Geez, what a stretch.....

A: Sexual-explicit
****
Q: Comment: @wiliki:  Just because the ethics commission said it wasn't unethical doesn't mean that the Mayor taking two hours of vacation every month to go and work at another job during normal business hours where he gets paid almost twice his Mayoral salary isn't unethical.  It just means that the ethics commission was corrupt and agreed to turn a blind eye towards this situation that is clearly unethical.  No other politician in the state of Hawaii or for that matter possibly in the entire United States is in a similar situation.  Even our legislature who's members have private sector jobs when they are not in session don't work both jobs at the same time.  Wiliki, if you had a real job working 40 hours a week and you told your boss that you want to take two hours of vacation time during normal business hours to go and work at another job, do you think your boss would say yes?  I don't think so!  LOL!

A: Non-sexual-explicit
****
Q: Comment: And I can give you a whole history down through the centuries with popes, cardinals, bishops and priests who had sex with women, girls, and boys----they didn't care which. 
 

Because Pope Sixtus IV [1471-84] collected church tax on prostitutes and charged priests for keeping mistresses, it's believed that this was what increased the clerical homosexuality---not being homosexual.

A:
Sexual-explicit
****