In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence can be inferred from the statement. Incorrect choices change the meaning in important ways or have details that are not mentioned in the statement. Indicate your answer as 1,2, or 3 corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.
--------
Question: Statement: Anyone who knew Tony Lukas even slightly was deeply impressed by his boundless, open-minded curiosity about the injustices of modern life, along with his stubborn reportorial integrity about getting to the very bottom of any story as best he could. Choices:  1. Tony Lukas was an elitist.  2. People who knew Tony Lukas were impressed by his curiosity and integrity in the news field.  3. Tony Lukas was open minded, curious and stubborn. 

Answer: 2


Question: Statement: The old man was like that, admitted Julius. Choices:  1. The old man was nothing like that, Julius confessed. 2. He'd been like that for all of Julius' life. 3. Julius had to admit that this is what the old man was like.

Answer: 3


Question: Statement: well do you think that um it should be like we have this sort of random spot testing type of thing or do you think it would be more palatable if we had some sort of regular schedule or would that just allow everybody a chance to get out of it Choices:  1. People would probably take advantage of the regular schedule. 2. Do you think problems might come up if we had a regular schedule for it? 3. Having a regular schedule would give the people no ways to get out of it.

Answer:
2