instruction:
Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
question:
For me, in public interests dialogue, civility is basic. If you prefer to deal in issues of civility rather than public interest substance, then this forum on news articles will not satisfy you. Nor should it! Confrontation over civility is not among its' (:or my own) goals.
answer:
No


question:
Oh YIPPEE, the progressive like a total liar and traitor who should be behind bars.  Oh well it wont make it past Trump.
answer:
Yes


question:
Our problem is similar to the homeless problems nationally: Mentally ill, substance addicted, rural in-migrants & under-educated chronically unemployable are the bulk of our park dwellers & homeless. Some are decades old cases who have either been ignored, cast aside or have avoided treatment by appropriate agencies.  Others are- sadly -  new youth with only older homeless as daily role models.
I support rapid response by community service patrols/police to clear the parks - for at least moments at a time. But CHANGE takes a larger perspective.  I'd prefer to see minimal-cost, sponsored & "controlled" year-round homeless camping areas in our City - jointly managed by the Muni and by the homeless themselves. Provision of a scheduled mobile meal-prep/delivery van; lease-purchase of a mobile military/emergency services showering unit; use of an on-site motor home as a center for various social services personnel to "do their thing"- ALL could begin profound improvements to our situation.
answer:

No