In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Example Input: Comment: Those that are leaving comments stereotyping homeless are ignorant on how the majority of homeless really are and it seems like they're getting their ideas from fear mongering. I've spent a lot of time around homeless in Anchorage. I used to live in the heart of Mt. View and had to ride bus 45 frequently, which stops by Brother Francis Shelter & Bean's Cafe. I've been in tough spots where I've had to frequent food banks because I "made too much" for food stamps, but wasn't making enough to afford rent, bills, bus fare, and groceries. Not all homeless act out of violence. Yes, some homeless do drink or take drugs, but for the most part, they keep to themselves and get just as annoyed at the other homeless who abuse substances as some of the people speaking on here do. Spend some actual, real time around homeless people before you stereotype them all into something they're not.
Example Output: Non-obscene

Example Input: Comment: Democrats??? What about Trump and his "pussy grabbing!"
Example Output: Obscene

Example Input: Comment: I'm still patiently waiting for you to cite which of Jesus' words you believe I reject. Making such a wild accusation (and it is wild since you produce not one jot of evidence fot it) that I reject the entire 'OT and the letters of the NT...and the revealed word of God through  his Church' is just, well, very, very silly. You can do better than this, can't you?
Example Output:
Non-obscene