We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

[EX Q]: People want all kinds of weapons but none of you douchebags wants the responsibility for having such freedoms.
[EX A]: Valid

[EX Q]: You're saying that the Constitution should be changed and updated to meet the times in any manner that the government believes would be in their best interest, or even repealed outright and entirely.
[EX A]: Valid

[EX Q]: If gun control will not affect criminal ownership of guns and people will always be able to get a firearm if they want, why should a government make the effort to ban firearms as a precursor to atrocities?
[EX A]:
Valid