We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Input: Consider Input: Sent1: "We know for a FACT that innocent people have been put to death already"- then give me their names.
 Sent2: The list of men on death row who were found to be innocent and released is long and growing, and we can only guess how many innocents have been put to death.

Output: Similar


Input: Consider Input: Sent1: Since there are many people sentenced for murder that are actually innocent (~10% who were sentenced to death who were proved innocent in appeal), you would be causing a lot more innocent deaths than you would be saving.
 Sent2: You need to find lots more for the death penalty to save more lives than innocents that have been executed by it.

Output: Similar


Input: Consider Input: Sent1: And no, I don't the death penalty is murder.
 Sent2: I'm pro-death penalty because there is no atonement for murder.


Output: Not similar