Categorize the comment on the basis of severe toxicity. If the comment is severely toxic output Yes, otherwise output No.
--------
Question: ...or who have that damn predictive text on their cell phones.

Answer: Yes


Question: That's a common misconception about tenured faculty. It depends on the department, college or university. Some tenured faculty are expected to publish a lot, whereas others are not expected to publish at all. I know of full professors who haven't published in a decade but have earned "honors" and "awards" and pay increases not contingent on publishing. Some are rewarded for other activities, or simply by the reputation they earned many years ago. Sometimes, like in any organization, there is favoritism, nepotism, etc.

The status of tenure is also changing with this new generation of faculty, as universities and colleges no longer have (and most can't financially sustain) as many tenured faculty as they once did. This coincides with the fact that the structure of higher education is also changing as online education is becoming more prominent and campus-based higher education is less necessary for delivering quality research and instruction to a wide audience anywhere.

Answer: No


Question: You're fooling yourself. People like you will find something else to be miserable about. especially when you think working hard for your own money to support yourself is greed because you refuse to give your money to a dead end dead beat leech who did nothing to support themselves.

Answer:
No