Categorize the comment on the basis of toxicity. If the comment is toxic (harmful, malicious, derogatory, threat, insult, identity attck, etc.) output Yes, otherwise output No.

Ex Input:
What part of deficit, no money, we need cuts, layoffs, oil moving out of state, do these people not understand?  Their own $30,000 report states that we will save money by dropping the current lease and moving to a building already owned by the state.   Should be a simple decision MOVE! 

Seems they are not interested in the fact that the majority of Alaskans want them out of the building and they are thumbing their upper crust noses at the very same people that put them in office.  

This is what happens when people do not care about who runs this place and sit watching TV or on Face book rather than taking the time to educate themselves on the issues and people that will run their lives… Oh and not to mention that voting is a major inconvenience to the busy lives of 60% of Alaskans.

Ex Output:
No


Ex Input:
Nobody seems to know who authorized the filing of this futile appeal?  Sailing into troubled waters and captained by fools!

Ex Output:
Yes


Ex Input:
It would be wonderful to have so with higher credentials perform tests. There have been small scale tests performed. There are no retail investors to exploit the potential profits.

Steve is a conservationist, so many of the projects they hope this will support have an environmental focus.

For the salinity concern collection volumes are focused on surplus flow like storm run off. Most of the collection points were designed to be portable to minimize impacts on fishing industry and migratory species.

You can learn more at RiverRecycler.com

Ex Output:

No