Categorize the comment on the basis of severe toxicity. If the comment is severely toxic output Yes, otherwise output No.
--------
Question: No, you're pretty much an idiot, but you feel really good about it.   Now your fellow idiots will chime in and say I'm not being civil.   One day people like us will have a serious disagreement.

Answer: Yes


Question: We got to get everyone to keep on puffing!   My kid's school needs a few more teachers, full time library and PE!  Seriously with any luck, this could make an positive impact (in time).   Come on stoners, get to it!

Answer: Yes


Question: Actually that is exactly the fourth and latest excuse Lisa sent me as to why she was opposed to giving Merrick Garland the traditional hearings and votes for SCOTUS. She said that as Chair of a Committee she had to respect Chairman Grassley's obstructionist refusal to hold Judiciary hearings. Right? Doesn't matter if the Chairman is working contrary to historic Congressional norms in her eyes, all that matters is that he is a Chairman. Sort of like how she supports the ludicrously unqualified Trump simply because he is the Republican nominee. Party over country over and over again for Murkowski.

Answer:
No