We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Input: Consider Input: Sent1: Exactly the sort of person that we might want put to death by the justice system.
 Sent2: By the same token, if we keep administering the death penalty while the system is broken, we will have a much greater risk of putting someone innocent to death.

Output: Not similar


Input: Consider Input: Sent1: So all in all I believe in the death penalty.
 Sent2: As far as I know, you may as well ACTUALLY believe any number of things, if you actually believe in the death penalty.

Output: Not similar


Input: Consider Input: Sent1: But as long as they are only options, I support the criminals right to choose that particular method.
 Sent2: that is why I support it for serial killers, I don't really support it for a murderer.


Output: Not similar