We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

Input: Consider Input: You're so quick at finding the exceptions in California's mandatory storage law, you should have no problem understanding the language of the basic Castle Doctrine laws.

Output: Valid


Input: Consider Input: You would rather be confronted by a guy with a baseball bat because you are FAR more likely to get killed by the guy with the gun.

Output: Valid


Input: Consider Input: Using a shotgun or an AK-47 will get the job done, so I don't see the need to ban assault weapons.


Output: Valid