We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

Input: Consider Input: So it seems that in the case of DC the justification for protecting the right to bear arms is lacking.

Output: Valid


Input: Consider Input: I would argue, for example, that since so called ���assault weapons��� are not as common today as handguns then they must be more ���dangerous and unususal��� and therefore more subject to a ban.

Output: Valid


Input: Consider Input: Making guns illegal wouldn't solve anything except to take them away from people that want to defend themselves.


Output: Valid