In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Ex Input:
Comment: that you are so pompously arrogant to speak on behalf of all the public, you might consider counseling to address your inflated ego problem.

Ex Output:
Non-sexual-explicit


Ex Input:
Comment: If the Democrats had any brains they would never "block" a Supreme Court nominee just based on ideology.  If they are not qualified that is one thing but if they are not a left winger that is nonsense.  Maybe the Republicans should then block any leftie from the court who is otherwise qualified.  This kind of stuff is what ruins our entire system and makes people not trust it at all.  We want good judges who are not buried in ideology but can rule on the facts and the law.  How hard is that?  Often, it is much easier than checking a potential ruling against a certain ideology.  Try it!

Ex Output:
Non-sexual-explicit


Ex Input:
Comment: I did it a little differently.  On my son's 18th birthday he asked me to take him to a titty bar.  I told him I would never go into such a place and I hoped that he wouldn't either.  Women were not to be thought of a pieces of meat.

Ex Output:

Sexual-explicit