We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Ex Input:
Sent1: And especially why would one do that if it means death penalty would become possible?
 Sent2: The death penalty provides a possible (but by no means apparent) benefit on crime rates compared to imprisonment, but a very definite loss on human happiness.

Ex Output:
Not similar


Ex Input:
Sent1: The jury sees partially false evidence which has been biased by a lawyer and the emotions of the family members, and then convicts an innocent person and sentence him to death.
 Sent2: A life sentence can be reversed if th convicted individual is later found innocent by new evidence.

Ex Output:
Not similar


Ex Input:
Sent1: Well I think that if someone commits a crime worthy of the death penalty they should get a sentence for life that way they can't be a repeat offender.
 Sent2: Most people deranged enough to commit crimes worthy of the death penalty feel no remorse for what they have done.

Ex Output:

Not similar