instruction:
Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
question:
What legal precedent requires a duly tried and convicted defendant to pay for "upgrades" as part of their restitution? I knew this would turn into a blank check boondoggle. Government always decides to give itself endless free money.
answer:
No


question:
Interesting
answer:
No


question:
As to the "many" I was referring to "many" you mentioned here: "I think you mean trespass. Precious Earth/Davis is one of many property owners who have asked the Higmans to stop trespassing on their land..:"

The question about the possible public nature of depositions was a general question about any depositions in civil cases.

My reference to the City attorney was made as he was present at the last Council meeting and he did address questions of law in general rather than those only pertinent to a specific case.
answer:

Yes