We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.
--------
Question: Sent1: If we can not prevent the innocent from unjust punishment, we should not have the death penalty.
 Sent2: The fact is that as long as we have a death penalty (the only Western nation to have it), we will execute innocents with the guilty.

Answer: Similar


Question: Sent1: The death penalty should not be catagorized as a deterrent.
 Sent2: Therefore the argument of death as a deterent is a joke.

Answer: Similar


Question: Sent1: If I could be satisfactorily convinced that a murderer had ZERO chance of committing another crime, I might be convinced to do away with the death penalty.
 Sent2: I firmly believe that some crimes and criminals are deserving of death.

Answer:
Not similar