We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Sent1: The death penalty can be viewed as legalized murder, which is ironic considering that such a punishment is only imposed because of the cruelty of the crime - murder.
 Sent2: I think the death penalty is an archaic and obsolete form of punishment, even for the crime of murder.
Not similar

Sent1: But killing someone because of him killing someone is quite hypocritical.
 Sent2: First it is more expensive to kill a person, then letting him stay for a life long imprisonment.
Not similar

Sent1: The fact remains that life in prison is cheaper than sentencing one to the death penalty.
 Sent2: it has been proven time and again prisons don't rehabilitate, keeping someone in prision for their entire life in prision is less human than the death penalty.

Not similar