In this task, you're given a statement, and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence clearly disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3' corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.

Q: Statement: considerations could support recommendation of rate and classification changes tailored to the capabilities and needs of particular mailers. Choices:  1. The rates and classifications might be changed to better meet the needs of certain mailers. 2. Mailers need to pay lower rates in order to stay in business. 3. Any considerations made would not support changes to the mailers' rates.

A: 3
****
Q: Statement: Opponents said reformers shouldn't jump the gun, since 1) the decision did not deal with soft money; and 2) the court refused to overturn its 1976 decision that campaign spending limits do impede free speech. Choices:  1. Opponents and reformers should act immediately without any other consideration. 2. Opponents and reformers should not act prematurely without considering all of the factors.  3. Opponents and reformers should not act with too much haste without considering hard money.

A: 1
****
Q: Statement: This was cold comfort. Choices:  1. This was unnerving comfort in an essence. 2. The comfort provided was warming and, well, comforting to say the least. 3. The exact feeling of this attempted comfort wasn't really warm, but more like it wasn't trying to be comforting, more harsh and cold than anything.

A:
2
****