TASK DEFINITION: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: toxic and non-toxic. Toxicity is defiend as anything that is rude, disrespectful, or unreasonable that would make someone want to leave a converation.
PROBLEM: Comment: This guy is incredibly dumb. He's going to be eaten alive in Los Angeles.

SOLUTION: Toxic

PROBLEM: Comment: I hope those rigid young people that like the Traditional Latin Mass will be listened to.

SOLUTION: Non-toxic

PROBLEM: Comment: The comment about water isn't bizarre, most villages if you ask what their priorities usually center around clean running water, public safety and access to healthcare, I've never heard that the need sex offender management program providers.  It just isn't on the list since many are still dealing with life and safety issues.

Registration for most offenders in Alaska is 15 years, not lifetime. Lifetime registration is reserved for those convicted two or more times. You're actually not going to get disagreement from me about the senselessness of the registry.  Its a waste of money.

And just in case you're not aware, Office of Victim's Rights extends to all victims, not just sexual assault victims.  Child Advocacy Centers are where forensic interviews happen about physical and sexual violence, so it covers a spectrum too.  

And I'm aware its just a choice of words, but victims don't need to be rehabilitated.  The phrase I'm sure you meant was restoration.

SOLUTION:
Non-toxic