instruction:
Given a paragraph about movies and a set of conversational questions and answers about the paragraph, say whether the passage contains sufficient information to answer the follow-up question. Say Yes if it is answerable; otherwise, say No. The paragraph has the prefix 'CONTEXT:'. Each conversation question has a prefix `Q:` followed by the answer prefix `A:`, and the follow-up question has a prefix `FOLLOWUP_Q:`.
question:
CONTEXT: After some searching around finally found it: Polonaise in A-flat major, Op. 53, by Chopin, known as "Heroic" The piece is famous for being extremely difficult and is often included in standard repetoires of professional pianists to demonstrate their skill. In the context of the movie, it demonstrates the mad Moreau's obsession with music and is emblematic of his misguided genius, playing on, oblivious to all, detached from reality of the monstrosity of the island. (In the film, actor Brando is not actually playing the piano, but just fingering the keys to a recording.)  <sep>  Q: In the Island of Dr. Moreau (1996) Marlon Brando's character plays what piece on the piano? A: Polonaise in A-flat major, Op. 53, by Chopin, known as "Heroic  Q: What is Polonaise? A: The piece is famous for being extremely difficult and is often included in standard repetoires of professional pianists to demonstrate their skill  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Brando's Character, Dr Moreau, plays a duet with one of his creations. What is the piano piece they are playing?
answer:
No


question:
CONTEXT: To a strong movie fan, no, it cannot hurt - ever. An alternate (possibly revisionist) version of a movie cannot detract from the original viewing experience, it can only add an additional positive (or negative) experience. In the case of Ridley and Blade Runner, I have every version, and his “Final Cut” is my favorite, and I am pleased-giddy that he was able to get yet another version released. It is my opinion that, given 4+ versions, you have the luxury of choosing the one you enjoy most. You have nothing but upside! Any downside is for pessimists, or people who have undue hatred for capitalist who play their little games – while we are still free to play ours. In the case of his refusal to agree to a Director's Cut of Prometheus – that is cool too. I enjoy the fact that as an artist Ridley Scott wraps his arms fully around the meta concept of additional releases, and indeed incorporates that into the overall art – like Claude Monet's Water Lilies, or Haystacks – as long as HE is making the decisions. (You might argue the opposite for 99% of all other director/studio combos.)  <sep>  Q: Does Ridley Scott's Director's Cut releases hurt his movies? A: To a strong movie fan, no, it cannot hurt - ever  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Is it common to do a director's cut?
answer:
No


question:
CONTEXT: There is no published in or out of universe explanation about Guinan/her people and Q/the Q. It was never expanded on in the show, movies, in canon or non-canon books or video games, or any of the released production notes or interviews. Given how extensive the information we have about TNG and star trek in general, compared to other shows, that's very telling. Production must not want it to be known. It was a plot point that was abandoned and never brought up again in any shape or form. It almost makes it a discontinuity.  <sep>  Q: What was the prior relationship between Q and Guinan? A: There is no published in or out of universe explanation about Guinan/her people and Q/the Q  Q: Was Guinan's true identity every revealed? A: It was a plot point that was abandoned and never brought up again in any shape or form. It almost makes it a discontinuity  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: So, were they originally intending for Guinan to have a certain back-story?
answer:

Yes