We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Example Input: Sent1: If someone is bad enough to be considered for the death penalty then they must have had sure evidence that they are guilty if they are then they shouldn't deserve the right to live among people they could kill
 Sent2: An argument for putting people to death is so that they can never escape and kill again.
Example Output: Not similar

Example Input: Sent1: If it is as serious as torture or murder... Yes we should.
 Sent2: So we kill killers, but in the end, end up with more murders.
Example Output: Not similar

Example Input: Sent1: Living in jail for life costs less money then the death penalty.
 Sent2: Executing people is costing this country money, lives, and dignity.
Example Output:
Similar