We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

Example Input: This is just further proof that gun control does not equal crime control and there are no "reasonable" nor "responsible" gun control laws.
Example Output: Valid

Example Input: Those who claim that Australia suffered a "crime wave" as a result of new gun laws often cite as evidence unrelated figures for common assault or sexual assault (no weapon) and armed robbery (any weapon).
Example Output: Valid

Example Input: Nowhere is there any mention of the right relating ONLY to active duty members of the militia -EVEN WITH SUCH QUALIFYING LANGUAGE !
Example Output:
Valid