We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

[Q]: Since murder is viewed as wrong, it generally makes more sense to eliminate the death penalty because murder rates are generally lower in those states.
[A]: Valid


[Q]: If you are going to argue for or against the death penalty, at least try to be a credit to the argument and present something that makes sense.
[A]: Valid


[Q]: Without corroboration, a conviction is not "beyond reasonable doubt" Luckily for the legal process, your cretinous opinion is irrelevant.
[A]:
Valid