In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine the neutral choice based on your inference from the statement and your commonsense knowledge. The neutral choice is a sentence that neither agrees nor disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3', corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence. If sentence X agrees with sentence Y, one's correctness follows from the other one. If sentence X disagrees with sentence Y, they can not be correct at the same time.

Ex Input:
Statement: Brief intervention for harm reduction with alcohol-positive older adolescents in a hospital emergency department. Choices: 1. An intervention in a hospital for kids whose siblings use alcohol. 2. There is no way to help kids who use alcohol. 3. The intervention for kids whose siblings used alcohol was very successful.

Ex Output:
3


Ex Input:
Statement: For example, the manufacturing company's central group reviewed all new Internet related applications and had the authority to stop such applications from going into production if minimum security standards were not met. Choices: 1. The manufacturing company's central group had the authority to stop new Internet related applications from going into production if minimum security standards were not met. 2. Very few of the applications they reviewed failed to meet minimum security standards. 3. The manufacturing company's central group did not have the authority to stop new Internet related applications from going into production.

Ex Output:
2


Ex Input:
Statement: Horse-race journalism ignores whether charges are true and focuses instead on whether they're damaging. Choices: 1. Horse-race journalism is not always preoccupied with truth. 2. Horse-race journalism doesn't pay attention to whether charges are damaging. 3. Horse-race journalism is more focused on riders than horses.

Ex Output:

3