In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

[EX Q]: Comment: The meaning of the slang aside, young men are virgins and women pop their "cherries" frequently with happy outcomes for all concerned. "Daddy" does not exclusively denote an actual father but more frequently alludes to an archetypical, and let's be honest here, Oedipal desire. 
In my opinion, the name has more to do with eroticism than sexual assault which is not at all "sexy". Dragging the name "Trump" into the discussion is definitely something that kills an erection--especially the female variety. Clearly, many heterosexual men have boners for Trump. Lol, what turns some men on intelligent women will never understand.
[EX A]: Sexual-explicit

[EX Q]: Comment: Lick it's balls and then it's mistresses lips, wherein she coos  "ooh, kisses for Mommy"  Barf.
[EX A]: Sexual-explicit

[EX Q]: Comment: Unfortunately, if you're not white you get put into a box all the time - by white people, who, last time I checked are not only still the majority but disproportionately hold all the institutional power and wealth in this country. White people freak out if they are criticized, but hurt feelings are nothing compared to the material costs of being non-white in our society.
[EX A]:
Non-sexual-explicit