Categorize the comment on the basis of obscenity. If the comment is obscene output Yes, otherwise output No.

Q: It's one thing to not like a restaurant. It's another thing to be a total ass about it. The photos are not good and this review is self important and ridiculous.

A: Yes
****
Q: Maybe we shouldn't have spent the money on these fancy laser detectors and just used some flashlights in toilet paper rolls instead, and then waited for this collision of supermassive black holes a million years from now:
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/01/08/science/in-a-far-off-galaxy-2-black-holes-dance-toward-an-explosive-union.html?_r=2

The black holes involved in the current study were actually pretty small (61 suns combined) compared to the supermassive black holes at the centers of galaxies that may have masses up to billions of suns.

A: No
****
Q: This sad story is indicative of the sort of person that one typically finds on university boards; most of them are business people who have only joined the board to network and make useful professional contacts.  They are motivated only by ambition and greed and cannot understand people with other motivations, whose ideas they dismiss as unimportant if not ridiculous.

A:
Yes
****