In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: insult and non-insult. Insult is any lanugage or act that is disrespectful or scornfully abusive.
--------
Question: Comment: Gary:  Several times in the past (years ago) I have attempted to have a reasonable discussion with a conservative Christian.  There is no way ever to win, compromise, or even to have a truce based on 'can we agree to disagree'.  They always know who is going to heaven (those who live the Bible word-for-word and call themselves Christian) and everyone else who is going south.  My family contains beliefs on both ends, which led to a total ban of religious discussion at any gathering.  Like other humble thinkers, I feel my strong spiritual belief is my own business, between me and my creator.  Just keeping myself humble and contemplative is a full-time occupation, let alone judging someone else's piety.  Why do some here have such a chip on their shoulder about religion?  Perhaps their beliefs are not quite firm enough for confidence, and they must constantly defend themselves for fear they might begin to doubt.

Answer: Non-insult


Question: Comment: Angela mcanulty i hope you rot bitch

Answer: Insult


Question: Comment: Actually, according to what I read on the web site of the Death Penalty Information Center, any federal prosecutor wanting to prosecute under the death penalty has to get "personal written permission from the Attorney General of the United States. Apparently, this may be due to the "seemingly racial bias"  in federal death penalty cases. The defendant in this case is not black but he is Hispanic. 
So, it might be Jeff Session whose has the final say if the prosecutor decides to go for the death penalty. 
Have no idea if this man had any prior convictions or if he is a pillar of the community. 
My guess is that they will not go for the death penalty. Of course, they might decide to make a "statement" about domestic violence (which would be great) and this case does fall under VAWA. That might be a way to "say" Trump takes violence against women seriously, political move? 
What do you think ?

Answer:
Non-insult