instruction:
Given a passage with a context and an answer, construct a question on the basis of the information present in the passage. Construct the question in such a way that (i) it is unambiguous, (ii) it is answerable from the passage, (iii) its answer is unique (iv) it answer uses text phrases from the passage. Avoid creating questions that (i) can't be answered correctly without actually understanding the passage and (ii) uses the same words or phrases given in the passage.
question:
Context: The role of Helicobacter pylori in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is controversial.', 'To compare the severity of GERD in infected vs. non-infected patients, as part of an ongoing randomized controlled trial that examines the impact of H. pylori eradication on GERD-related outcomes.', 'Consecutive GERD patients underwent urea breath testing and completed validated GERD symptom severity, and quality of life questionnaires as well as, 24-h pH-metry. These parameters, as well as demographics and endoscopic findings were assessed in double-blinded fashion and compared between H. pylori-infected and non-infected subjects.', "Helicobacter pylori-infected GERD patients (n=50) were significantly older and less educated than non-infected patients (n=51). They also used proton pump inhibitors less often but had no difference in symptoms (as measured with both the Spechler's Activity Index and the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale), quality of life, endoscopic findings or 24-h pH-metry findings.
Answer: This prospective, double-blind study demonstrates, using excellent GERD quantifying measures including validated symptom severity scores, endoscopy, and 24-h pH-metry, that there exist no clinically significant differences in clinical or laboratory-related GERD manifestations between H. pylori-infected and non-infected GERD patients.
answer:
Is there no difference in the disease severity of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease between patients infected and not infected with Helicobacter pylori?


question:
Context: Ischemic preconditioning (IPC) mitigates ischemia-reperfusion (I/R) injury in experimental models. However, the clinical significance of this protection has been unclear and a mortality reduction has not been previously reported in noncardiac models. This study examined the local and remote protection afforded by skeletal muscle IPC and sought to determine the significance of this protection on mortality.', "Mice subjected to 2 h hindlimb ischemia/24 h reperfusion (standard I/R injury) were compared with those undergoing a regimen of two 20-min cycles of IPC followed by standard I/R injury. Local injury was assessed via gastrocnemius histology, and remote injury was evaluated via intestinal histology and pulmonary neutrophil infiltration (n = 7). Mortality was compared in parallel groups for 1 week (n = 6). Groups were analyzed using an unpaired Student's t-test for gastrocnemius and pulmonary injury, and a Mann-Whitney rank sum test for intestinal injury. Mortality differences were interpreted through a hazard ratio.", 'Significant protection was observed in preconditioned animals. There was a 35% local injury reduction in skeletal muscle (71.2% versus 46.0%, P < 0.01), a 50% reduction in remote intestinal injury (2.3 versus 1.1, P < 0.01), and a 43% reduction in remote pulmonary injury (14.9 versus 8.5, P < 0.01) compared with standard injury controls. Preconditioned animals were also significantly protected from mortality, demonstrating a 66.7% survival at 1 wk compared with 0% survival after standard injury alone (hazard ratio 0.20, 95% CI: 0.02-0.59).
Answer: We have developed a murine model of IPC that demonstrates local and remote protection against I/R injury, and exhibits significant mortality reduction. This model demonstrates the powerful effect of IPC on local and remote tissues and will facilitate further study of potential mechanisms and therapies.
answer:
Does ischemic preconditioning of skeletal muscle mitigate remote injury and mortality?


question:
Context: It has been argued that carotid intima-media thickness (IMT) could better reflect an adaptive response of the vessel wall rather than being a marker of atherosclerosis. We explore this hypothesis by analyzing the ARTICO data.', 'The ARTICO study was designed to evaluate the prognostic value of the pathological ankle-brachial index (ABI) for the emergence of new vascular events in patients who have suffered a noncardioembolic stroke. Collected variables were as follows: vascular risk factors, mean waist perimeter, quantification of carotid IMT, characteristics of carotid plaques, ABI, and presence of microalbuminuria.', "A total of 591 patients with a complete carotid evaluation were available. There was no correlation between ABI and IMT (Spearman's, p NS). Logistic regression revealed that pathological ABI correlated significantly only with internal carotid artery stenosis\u2009greater than or equal to\u200950% (OR [odds ratio] 2.80, 1.66-4.71, P\u2009<\u2009.01) and peripheral artery disease (OR 3.33, 1.63-6.78, P\u2009<\u2009.01). However, multivariate regression analysis demonstrated that carotid IMT was independently associated with age (OR 1.05, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02-1.09, P\u2009<\u2009.01), hypertension (OR 1.83, 95% CI 1.02-3.26, P\u2009=\u2009.04), waist circumference (OR 1.03, 95% CI 1.01-1.05, P\u2009<\u2009.01), and microalbuminuria (OR 2.02, 95% CI 1.22-3.35, P\u2009<\u2009.01).
Answer: In our patients, carotid IMT does not seem to be associated with unequivocal markers of atheromatosis such as the existence of relevant carotid plaques or pathological ABI. These results as well as the association of IMT with age, hypertension, microalbuminuria, and mean waist perimeter support the hypothesis that IMT must be considered a risk factor for general vascular disease rather than a marker of atherosclerotic burden.
answer:

Is carotid Intima-Media Thickness Associated with Markers of Atherosclerosis in Stroke Patients?