We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

[Q]: Sent1: I realize that these anti-gun rights historians need to impress upon the 2nd Amendment a militia regulating action but there is no legal evidence of the 2nd being inspected or held to inform upon any aspect of militia powers.
 Sent2: The 2nd Amendment gives citizens the rights to own a gun, not the Militia Act.
[A]: Not similar


[Q]: Sent1: Saw a great article today by Michael Bloomberg (yes, that Michael Bloomberg), about where the illegal guns used in crimes come from - mainly from the states with weak gun control laws.
 Sent2: with regard to the fact that most gun crime is from illegl guns, in that case why not make all guns illegal.
[A]: Not similar


[Q]: Sent1: The Second Amendment isn't a gun control law, it's an individual right, independent from militia service.
 Sent2: Here's the thing...the Second Amendment and the right to be armed for your own defense isn't just a right, it's a fundamental, human, and individual right.
[A]:
Similar