In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Example Input: Comment: As the title of the editorial says “the reactions are revealing”....some really ugly crap being spouted here by the good ol boys.
Example Output: Obscene

Example Input: Comment: Once again Rhyner, you manage to typify the average Trump fan: undereducated older white male. If you knew anything about the history of prohibition you'd know it was a miserable failure in so many ways. Pick up a history book sometime, and read the damn thing.
Example Output: Obscene

Example Input: Comment: Jesus and his teaching that made this western civilization possible and his message is fully rejected by all Islamic peoples. That's all we need to know really, or is it just an option and acceptable to reject our cultural fore-bearers to be politically correct? Why tolerate people that don't follow our teacher? That's too much kindness that bites us in the end. Please delete this message as I am compiling a list of deleted comments to submit later to discredit my opponents that hate Jesus our Saviour. My human rights are being abrogated by people that don't like my Teacher. To make matters worst, they endorse or excuse Islamic violence as legitimate when it is not even Islamic and accuse us of being mentally ill for fearing religiously inspired gratuitous violence by making up labels like, Islamophobia. I hate hatred, no matter how it is justified. Islamophobia is hatred targeting us.
Example Output:
Non-obscene