The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the self-need strategy, otherwise output No. self-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to create a personal need for an item in the negotiation, such as by pointing out that the participant sweats a lot to show preference towards water packages.

Q: Context: 'Hi there! Are you excited about camping?' 'Hey! I sure am! The only thing is, I just learned that the canyon where I'm camping is going to be experiencing an unexpected heat wave over the next few days and I'm worried I might not be fully prepared. ☹️ What about you?' 'Same here! Last time my daughter got dehydrated and it made her sick!'
Utterance: 'That sounds awful! 😮 Where are you going to be camping?'

A: No
****
Q: Context: 'Aww I'm sorry to hear that, it sounds like it might be better to have her bring her own food. I'll be bringing my teenage son so it would be awesome to get any extra food for him that I can. You know how they be! 🙂' 'What about I take 2 of the packages and you take 1? I know teenagers also drink a lot of water haha 🙂' 'He definitely does drink a lot of water, but he's in a growth spurt so 2 would be ideal. I'm happy to give up all firewood in exchange for the extra food!'
Utterance: 'okay that sounds like a better deal then! I will take all the firewood and 1 food, and you can take the 2 food packages'

A: No
****
Q: Context: 'What are you most interested in getting?' 'I think food is my highest priority, What about you?'
Utterance: 'Food is also my highest priority, but firewood is also pretty close for me.'

A:
No
****