instruction:
In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: threat and non-threat. Threat is a statement that someone will be hurt or harmed, especially if the person does not do something in particular.
question:
Comment: Sounds real exciting. I just can't wait to see two grown men viciously punching the crap out of each other. You see, the biggest problem we have nowadays is that there is simply not enough fighting in the world. Not enough violence. Hey, maybe we'll get lucky and see one of the fighters get badly injured. Maybe even knocked unconscious. And if we REALLY  get lucky, maybe we will get to see one of the fighters actually bleed. Yes I'm being sarcastic but in a sad way. I wouldn't befriend a person who enjoyed watching this "entertainment" (garbage).
answer:
Threat


question:
Comment: If a dude is actively threatening to kill someone, a head shot with a scoped .308 or .223 may be reasonable.  The same is not true of a dude sitting alone in his house.  In the latter case, there is no active threat.  We people instruct police to kill the dude anyway just to prove that they must do what we want when we want it.  Okay, if that is the kind of society we want, so be it.  Recall, that we really know nothing about what the dude did, but I guess the point is that we should kill him to teach others to do what police officers tell them regardless of the circumstance.  Okay, whatever.  We craft the society in our image and reap the benefit when citizens kill because we have taught them how little value life has.
answer:
Threat


question:
Comment: "Mr. Trump’s never-ending obsession with women’s blood"
Sigmund Freud, Carl Jung, and practitioners of more modern psychology/psychiatry -- even Scientologists -- would have a field day with President Trump's obsession with denigrating women by referring to blood.
President Trump is emotionally stunted.
And it's not about politics. I didn't like President George W Bush's politics, but Bush didn't use Facebook or Twitter to incessantly denigrate women critics or political opponents.
Regarding the National Enquirer: Trump forgets the easiest way to ward off a blackmail attempt is for the intended target to publicly announce the alleged indiscretion, and to announce the target has proof of the intended blackmail. When the magazine itself intervenes to say, yes we ran a story and the White House should butt out, it makes the blackmailer look foolish and petty.
Twitter and other social media would do the country and the planet a public service by shutting off all #realDonaldTrump accounts.
answer:

Non-threat