Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.

Example Input: Isn't that comparing apples to oranges?  Anchorage has a somewhat reliable revenue system in property taxes.  Additionally, wasn't the increase in pay a move to correct a deficiency in pay to responsibility which was having a negative impact on police administration specifically where one internal position for a police lieutenant went unfulfilled because of the deficiency?

http://www.adn.com/alaska-news/2016/05/24/anchorage-assembly-raises-pay-for-police-fire-commanders/

Also a correction is in order.  The number you toss about was for fire chiefs and police captains.  Battalion chiefs and police lieutenants got a lower increase of 10-30k.  Finally chief and deputy chief positions in either department get nothing.
Example Output: No

Example Input: Dear Alaska Dispatch,

Someone confused the dates in the caption above.  Thursday is April 28th while the event is Friday and Saturday, April 29 and 30.  This is really important to those needing to know.
Example Output: No

Example Input: Well then, stop writing op-ed pieces about things we already know and get back to work! Every one of you down there knows what the People want. But, apparently, the oil company's come first. Truly a sad and somehow illegal waiting game. It's not like the oilies will run screaming back to ????. We are a safe, willing, and extremely easily influenced oil state.
Example Output:
No