In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: toxic and non-toxic. Toxicity is defiend as anything that is rude, disrespectful, or unreasonable that would make someone want to leave a converation.
--------
Question: Comment: Let me guess...a white boy that failed to take advantage of the educational and other opportunities that Canada provided to get ahead, so he now screams 'white genocide' because a white girl chooses to be with someone that did take advantage of the opportunities but just also happens to have a slightly different skin colour. In other words...a loser.

Answer: Toxic


Question: Comment: No Politica, per favore.
Omicidio, non politica.

Migliore,

RTD

Answer: Non-toxic


Question: Comment: CommonWetDreams.org is a completely lame citation.

Try some hard facts instead, It was desperate and huge turnout by white evangelicals in the "firewall" states that put Trump over. 

These fanatics were hardly going to vote for Sanders, who was even more aligned with the "Black Devil" in the White House.

Clinton won the vote of the lower income segment and all race/cultural minorities. Sanders wouldn't have done better.

-- Paul

Answer:
Non-toxic