instruction:
We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.
question:
Sent1: Keeping violent criminals in prison would do far more to reduce gun crime than banning guns.
 Sent2: Supporting gun control to stop violent criminals, is like supporting a ban on cameras to stop child pornography.
answer:
Not similar


question:
Sent1: One such person who is prohibited by federal law from having a firearm at all is the convicted felon:
 Sent2: Do not ban guns when guns are the tools of man.
answer:
Not similar


question:
Sent1: The language itself is not dubious or ambiguous: ���A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state.�۝
 Sent2: Amendment militia preamble is no different: ���A well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state�۝���a state in which the citizen need not fear the ambitions of a would-be military tyrant at the head of a standing army.
answer:

Similar