The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.

[Q]: Context: 'Are you sure you won't get hungry? I am open to giving you the two waters, but I want to make sure its the best deal for you. I would want 2 firewoods and 2 foods in exchange.' 'brother  k ,  bro  2 water and 2 wire wood 1 firewood can you given?' 'I think that that is acceptable to me. I want to make sure we both understand: I get 1 Water, 2 Firewood, 2 Food Packages. You get 2 Waters, 1 Firewood, 1 Food Package. I will have to ration my water, but I think the extra comfort is worth it. Does this work for you? '
Utterance: 'bro its not profitable ratiobro gave 3 water 1 firewood, remaning you can take'
[A]: No


[Q]: Context: 
Utterance: 'Hello, how are you? 🙂, we are excited to go camping for 2 weeks. I was wondering, if its okay with you, if I can get all 3 waters? what are your thoughts? we have a large group, lots of kids, need the extra water for cooking, putting out camp fire, and keeping all of us warm at night. '
[A]: Yes


[Q]: Context: 'Ok, but I need at least 1 package of water. So, I can give you 2 packages of water along with the 1 package of firewood and the 3 packages of food. Do we have a deal?🙂' 'So i get 1 firewood, 2 water and 3 food?' 'Yes, do we have a deal?'
Utterance: 'Yeah, we have a deal. Thank you '
[A]:
No