In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: insult and non-insult. Insult is any lanugage or act that is disrespectful or scornfully abusive.

Input: Consider Input: Comment: are these people really that stupid. Cbd is one of the more benign products out there. Anybody know the email of the idiots doing this?

Output: Insult


Input: Consider Input: Comment: That the victim 'deserved' killing is not a viable argument in Oregon.   

H. L Mencken's position regarding government officials does have some followers, though.

"I propose that it shall be no longer malum in se for a citizen to pummel, cowhide, kick, gouge, cut, wound, bruise, maim, burn, club, bastinado, flay, or even lynch a [government] jobholder, and that it shall be malum prohibitum only to the extent that the punishment exceeds the jobholder’s deserts. The amount of this excess, if any, may be determined very conveniently by a petit jury, as other questions of guilt are now determined."

"If it decides that the jobholder deserves the punishment inflicted upon him, the citizen who inflicted it is acquitted with honor."

There are governmental job and office holders.....

Output: Non-insult


Input: Consider Input: Comment: I responded to JohnH's comment. "According to a report recently released by the conservative CATO Institute, out of millions of refugees resettled to the United States over several decades, just 20 have committed or attempted attacks. They only managed to kill three people — all in the late 1970s before the creation of the modern screening system."  No restriction to Syria or anywhere else.  Obviously, non-resident aliens have killed many thousands of Americans with 9/11 being only the most obvious and extreme example.  The weasel word is resettled which was likely defined in fine print as having become American citizens and lived non-violently for X years.


Output: Non-insult