We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gay Marriage)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

[Q]: Sent1: It's weird indeed that all states except one allow single gay people to adopt children, but many do not allow gay couples to be adoptive parents together.
 Sent2: Neither gay nor straight parents have any right to be a parent to someone else's child.
[A]: Not similar


[Q]: Sent1: We should not argue that gays should have the 'right' to marry we should argue that the definition of ' marriage' should be changed.
 Sent2: If we broaden the definition of marriage to include same sex couples, wouldn't heterosexual unmarried couples still be discriminated against?
[A]: Not similar


[Q]: Sent1: FFC basically says that one state must recognize the marriages of other states and DOMA basically says "states don't have to recognize gay marriages of other states".
 Sent2: What it did say is that ANY union that is not marriage, which obviously includes "gay marriage" from the previous line and also "civil unions", is FORBIDDEN from being recognized by the government.
[A]:
Similar