In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Input: Consider Input: Comment: Luckily Trump will shut this idiot up once and for all.
Lord knows Junior can't. 
Platitudes, climate change rhetoric along with a few epithets won't take out your enemy.
Maybe Junior could carbon tax kim juck muck to oblivion like he is doing to us.

Saturday Night Live needs an MC -  kim juck muck would do fine

Output: Non-sexual-explicit


Input: Consider Input: Comment: That both groups might or might not have committed violent acts is beside the point, the point being that what the white supremacist group stands for is not acceptable to decent people. Are you saying that emphasizing that black lives matter is unacceptable? Indeed you do, as you are a racist since way back.

Output: Non-sexual-explicit


Input: Consider Input: Comment: "Masturbation was a sin. Sex before marriage was a sin. Homosexuality was a sin. Extra marital affairs was a sin. The only sexual act that was not a sin was sex between a man and a woman united in holy Matrimony."
sy
Correct teachings, one and all. 

"If you molest a child, you simply go to confession and have your sins forgiven and go out and sin again."

Sexual activity with a child is and has always been regarded as a very grave sin by the Church. Were you never taught that repentance and a firm commitment of amendment is necessary to validly receive the sacrament of confession? Indeed, one of the fears being voiced about Amoris Laetitia is that it undermines these core aspects of the sacrament.


Output: Sexual-explicit