In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.

[Q]: Comment: They should be tried for murder. " My friend is gone."
[A]: Agree


[Q]: Comment: You wish to continue to indulge in your hatred caused by irrational fears of Muslims without ever being called out for it.  Well, you still have every freedom to spew Islamaphobia (and that's exactly what you're defending here) but others have every right to continue to call it for what it is.  You and others continue to whine that you're not Islamaphobic and yet you never seem to be able to raise any non-bigoted, intelligent arguments about Islam.  In fact, you almost certainly haven't read the Qoran either so please, tell us, what fact-based, reason-based arguments do you have then????????  M103 is a motion.  Your hysterical response to it just highlights your irrationality even more.
[A]: Disagree


[Q]: Comment: What the hell for. They were in conflict. It was either Omar or some do good American. I bet if it was you you would probably cried while taking a shot of ammo from some American soldier. He is no terrorist. The American Army, the Conservative government made him in their own malicious, we are always right eyes. I have never voted Conservative since that twit from Saskatchewan killed the Arrow. The whole lot of Conservatives are a waste of news space, air space and parliament space.
[A]:
Disagree