In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

[Q]: Comment: Some men believe it is their born right to violate young children.  Geez
[A]: Sexual-explicit


[Q]: Comment: The only Trump supporter in Canada's tactics :

1/Use multiple anonymous names.

2/Post lies over and over again in ECHO chamber style.

3/Villify minorities and the poor.

4/When confronted with the inconvenient truth that Americans are far more likely to die as a result of their own gun or the gun of another American than a terrorist attack, go back to point #1

You always were a bother and a bore, Sweeney.

Do get lost
[A]: Non-sexual-explicit


[Q]: Comment: It's just another double down on the anonymous editorial on Indigenous people with some old white military historian who has ignored all the primary sources continuing the narrative of all those old rich white guys on the Globe and Mail board of directors.  Yes Canadians should be ashamed for committing genocide then and committing it today.  Some country.  Made on the backs of murder, displacement, racism, genocide, and nothing has changed in 150 years.  Of course to an old white guy like him he's privileged.
[A]:
Non-sexual-explicit