The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the self-need strategy, otherwise output No. self-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to create a personal need for an item in the negotiation, such as by pointing out that the participant sweats a lot to show preference towards water packages.

Context: 'Interesting - you're essentially saying that you need the majority of two of the three items. Hmm...' 'Yes, thats all. I need 1/3 food, 2/3 water, and 2/3 firewood.' 'Still not convinced in any way that you need more items in total over me. Please clarify!'
Utterance: 'Food is what I prioritize much more than the others. If you want the majority of the others, I will need all the food.'
No

Context: 'ok, if i get all 3 extra firewood, I'd be fine with getting 1 extra water while you get 2? food is a really low priority for me' 'Same here as well as I have carried enough but yes, I need firewood as most of y food requires cooking and specially my kids prefer having food hot.' 'Ok thats fair, I would prefer to have more firewood since I'm awful at collecting firewood while out. But we could be a more even split of it all. 2/1 for both. Do you need more water or more firewood?'
Utterance: 'I need more firewood, I can maage with 1 additional package of water.'
No

Context: 'How about water? do you need? I can offer 2 of these for 1 pack of food' 'I have plenty of water right now, but need at least 1 pack of food for myself.' 'OK. Do I get the water then? You can at least take a pack'
Utterance: 'Yes, that works for me. 🙂'

No