The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the self-need strategy, otherwise output No. self-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to create a personal need for an item in the negotiation, such as by pointing out that the participant sweats a lot to show preference towards water packages.

Context: 'I would give you all of the additional food if you gave me all of the additional water. ' 'That sounds like a deal' 'Shall we divide the firewood two to one? '
Utterance: 'sure as long as I am getting two wood.   It gets very cold at night where I go camping'
Yes

Context: 'You drive a hard bargain. I could really use that firewood. It's going to get cold tonight and these sleeping bags are not worth the price I paid ;)' 'Haha, I know but I am in the same situation! ☹️ and since I am getting less food I feel like it is fair I get on more firewood since I truly need that 🙂' 'Some extra water for coffee might keep us warm, would you consider taking 1 food, 2 wood, 1 water?'
Utterance: 'Sure I can do that 🙂'
No

Context: 'Yes, that would be fun.  I heard it is going to be unseasonably cold at night, so stay warm.  You'll have lots of family member to huddle together in a tent ' 'sounds great' 'Hi;  I thought I was getting 2 firewoods, 2 waters and one food. Is that what we agreed upon?'
Utterance: 'You said you would give me 2 waters and 1 food for your 2 firewoods '

No