We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Q: Sent1: I think there should be a death penalty because, all those innocent people getting killed for no damn reason is unfair.
 Sent2: With all this talk about innocent people being put to death, I was wondering.

A: Not similar
****
Q: Sent1: i think that life without opportunity of parole is the more humane and just punishment instead of the death penalty.
 Sent2: Most people who would be deterred already seem to be deterred by life without parole as a punishment.

A: Not similar
****
Q: Sent1: Or you could merely ignore them and concede that the death penalty is flawed, kills innocent people and costs the lives of innocents in the use of how it is funded
 Sent2: therefore the death penalty should not be used, simply because it kills innocent people.

A:
Similar
****