Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.

this post ...  it's not bad or offensive, just a bit rough when the story is about someone you know.    I don't think many people don't know the cause, and effect, of lung cancer.  if anyone is terrified more than ms dolan,  I would be surprised.    a few years back a friend was in the early stages of emphysema and we spoke of it briefly and he mentioned that ...dying was inevitable -  unthinking - I asked him about how it would impact his family.. witnessing his illness....living with it...watching him struggle.  we didn't speak of it again and he quit working soon after.  a couple years later I saw he and is wife at the dog park  - he looked like a scarecrow and was desperately sucking on oxygen.  I don't know who began crying first but we didn't say more than a quick hi.  I remembered every word of our conversation...as did he .  stupid me and god bless him,  he passed not long after.
 I wish this lady all the support and care and love in the world - she's tough
Yes

You have grossly misinterpreted that phrase. There is nothing in the 2nd Amendment that says or states one cannot carry concealed or open carry. It does however state clearly the right must NOT be infringed upon. Know what infringed means?

Infringed:
act so as to limit or undermine (something); encroach on.

it's pretty obvious the 9th circuit was wrong in it's decision. Which by the way will be overturned by the US Supreme Court. The 9th Circuit holds the record for most cases/rulings overturned by the Supreme court.
No

I have to say that being a Homeroid, I've never particularly cared for Seaton from way before him becoming a pol but I do appreciate him standing up to this nonsense, fully.

Yes