We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

Example Input: This is just further proof that gun control does not equal crime control and there are no "reasonable" nor "responsible" gun control laws.
Example Output: Valid

Example Input: I realize that these anti-gun rights historians need to impress upon the 2nd Amendment a militia regulating action but there is no legal evidence of the 2nd being inspected or held to inform upon any aspect of militia powers.
Example Output: Valid

Example Input: All of the Gun control you call for has been tried in other countries and the Criminals Still import guns in with their drugs.
Example Output:
Valid