In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Comment: would you pay 30,000 for a 4 year old car that is 5000 over MSRP

get a grip and trade in your brother in law instead
Non-obscene

Comment: I also applaud Ab. Chaput.   But why call this a  a progressive issue?  This is the response anyone should have to racist hate.  It's what any Christian, any reasonable person of any religion should have to Nazi rhetoric.
Non-obscene

Comment: I make facetious statements because the odds of offending people with my true feeling of disgust towards perpetrators that victimize some of the most vulnerable is subdued. I've seen a 76 year old man, on his deathbed, bawling like a baby trying to tell me how he was molested in his church as a teenager. He lived a bitter life and blamed God for what happened to him. It wasn't God, it was man's free will that did this to him. I've met people that have molested children, even claiming to be teaching their children to be sexual beings. Another was a youth leader in his church taking pictures of the young boys. His own wife turned him in.  I've seen the damage these perpetrators do to people. I refuse to have sympathy for them!  These people are disgusting people. 

That's why I choose to keep my remarks short. I'm angry and not feeling too loving towards these people.

Non-obscene