Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.

Q: I am aware of the logic behind replacing signals with roundabouts; however, I was wondering if the logic is actually working at Dowling because the roundabouts seem to be too small for the traffic volume and speed, especially at rush hour.  I'm also not aware of situations where roundabouts are designed to be plaed at the end of a freeway exit ramp.  

My third paragraph comment has to do with the way Dowling St. traffic views the yield signs.  Those motorists appear to barrel through the roundabout without yielding to exit ramp vehicles.  I'm wondering if drivers assume that street traffic has the right of way over exiting freeway traffic.   APD could raise a lot of money by enforcing rules at this intersection, particularly at rush hour.

A: No
****
Q: Eric Hill, that picture is amazing! It looks like a painting! I would proudly display that in my home, if I had one. My art is sitting in two lockers in humid Homer...I fear for it. Anyway...great picture and anybody got some cheap Xtra Tuffs? I have a huge, and judging from this, and mucky job for the next week...

A: No
****
Q: Are you alleging illegality? I'm not understanding....

A:
Yes
****