Categorize the comment on the basis of severe toxicity. If the comment is severely toxic output Yes, otherwise output No.
--------
Question: I read the article and here is the part I like......"The emerging answer is what Pickles calls “allowing users to control their own experience”, for example by using the mute button to screen out people they don’t like without that person knowing. Essentially it’s a way of allowing some tweeters to express divisive opinions without bothering others who won’t like it. One person’s right to free speech is matched by another’s right not to listen, as it might be at a party where you try to escape when trapped by the bore in the corner."...............Now that seems to me a much more favorable system than the one you are currently using. Give people a "mute" or "block button" that saves their preferences for who they don't want to see comments from. It can't get easier than that.

Answer: No


Question: I think they mentioned it less as a shot against Costco, and more because a lot of people shop at Costco so it makes the story more grabby.

Answer: No


Question: Randal Gay:  What you are saying makes no sense at all.  Obamacare does not in any way shape or form represent "Democrat obstruction".  The democrats had a majority, they held a vote and the vote passed by a simple majority (as required by law).  It was the Republicans that attempted to provide the obstruction.  As for the nuclear option, that was a bipartisan agreement agreed to by both sides.  They both thought it wouldn't go through because it was equally unpalatable to both sides

Answer:
No