Given a document, generate a short title of the document. The title should convey the main idea/event/topic about which the document is being written. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

Input: Consider Input: … How vitiated Bill Clinton seemed at the last Democratic convention. Some of his appetites  at least  had waned….With a pencil neck and a sagging jacket he clambered gamely onto the stage after Hillary’s acceptance speech and played happily with the red balloons that fell from the ceiling. When the couple repeatedly reminded the crowd of their new status as grandparents it was to suggest very different associations in voters’ minds. …Yet let us not forget the sex crimes of which the younger  stronger Bill Clinton was very credibly accused in the 1990s.  Juanita Broaddrick  reported that when  she  was a volunteer on one of  his  gubernatorial campaigns   she  had arranged to meet  him  in a hotel coffee shop. At the last minute   he  had changed the location to  her  room in the hotel  where  she  says  he  very violently raped  her .  She  said  she  fought against Clinton throughout a rape that left  her  bloodied. At a different Arkansas hotel   he  caught sight of a minor state employee named Paula Jones  and  Jones says   he  sent a couple of state troopers to invite  her  to  his  suite  where  he  exposed  his  penis to  her  and told  her  to kiss it. Kathleen Willey said that she met  him  in the Oval Office for personal and professional advice and that  he  groped  her   rubbed  his  erect penis on  her   and pushed  her  hand to  his  crotch. It was a pattern of behavior; it included an alleged violent assault; the women involved had far more credible evidence than many of the most notorious accusations that have come to light in the past five weeks. But Clinton was not left to the swift and pitiless justice that today’s accused men have experienced. Rather  he was rescued by a surprising force: machine feminism. The movement had by then ossified into a partisan operation and it was willing—eager—to let this friend of the sisterhood enjoy a little droit de seigneur.
A resolution expressing the sense of the Senate that  Juanita Broaddrick  never received a fair hearing for  her  charge of rape against the then-Attorney General of Arkansas William Jefferson Clinton  later President of the United States.
condemns the actions which  Ms. Broaddrick  alleges occurred in Little Rock  Arkansas in 1978 by then-State of Arkansas Attorney General William Jefferson Clinton as unacceptable and outrageous  to be condemned by all people of all races  creeds  and religions; pledges to do everything in its power  including holding public hearings  to probe the underlying causes of this brutal alleged rape by William Jefferson Clinton and an alleged threat to silence the victim by Hillary Rodham Clinton to make sure that the United States does not return to the days when such brutality and violence against women  along with threats to silence them  were deemed acceptable; calls on the Federal Bureau of Investigation  the Department of Justice  the White House  and all other Federal law enforcement agencies to conduct an immediate  full  and fair investigation into all of the facts of the case; calls upon each Senator and every citizen of the United States  in his or her own way  through his or her church  synagogue  mosque  workplace  or social organization  to join in denouncing and getting others to denounce this outrageous alleged rape of a defenseless woman and pledges to join in efforts to bring an end to rape and an end to the fear and hatred which underlie it  and to encourage all Americans to dedicate themselves to ending sexual violence in the United States.
Senators Mitch McConnell  John McCain  Susan Collins  and others like Ted Cruz and Mike Lee have condemned Judge Moore in the strongest terms and have called for his withdrawal from the Senate race. There should be no problem with these Senators and those who agree with them on the House side introducing identical resolutions that promise the American people and  Ms. Broaddrick  that they will at last take a serious look at  her  charges and act to educate the American people that both the Senate and the House will not stand for this kind of behavior as alleged by  Ms. Broaddrick . Or others who accused the Clintons like Paula Jones and Kathleen Willey.
Will this launch a demand from Democrats to do the same to President Trump? Doubtless — and having seen the allegations the American people elected him anyway. Nothing new has emerged since the President took office. The  Broaddrick  allegation on the other hand did not emerge until 1999  and  Broaddrick herself  says that NBC News withheld its explosive  graphic interview with  her  until it was too late to affect the Clinton impeachment trial. Bill Clinton would never be on a ballot with this spectacular charge in the public domain.
Will they do it? Will Moore opponent Doug Jones pledge to support such a resolution investigating the Clintons and the  Broaddrick  rape accusation if elected to the Senate?
But if all of a sudden so many Senators and Congressmen and Congresswomen are racing to microphones to say they are outraged? Then they need to do something about  Juanita Broaddrick  and what happened with the Clintons. To hold one hearing after another about Hollywood’s sex problem. To name names and hold people accountable.
The addition of Ted Cruz and Mike Lee to this fight bodes well for  Juanita Broaddrick  — and finally and at last holding Bill Clinton and Hillary Clinton responsible for their deeds. As even some notable liberals like the Atlantic and MSNBC’s Chris Hayes are finally doing.
The real question now? There is no excuse for this kind of behavior. Period. So where are the McCains and Flakes and other GOP insiders in and out of the Senate and the House in holding to account not just Roy Moore but their friends and fellow Establishment insiders? Will they bring about the Clinton reckoning as the Atlantic asks? Will they finally turn their Senate spotlight on the infamous Ted Kennedy/Chris Dodd “waitress sandwich” and the behavior of their own colleagues? Will these Senators put their time and actions in the Senate where they now say they really stand? Will they finally give  Juanita Broaddrick   her  due?

Output: Will the House and Senate Condemn Bill and Hillary Clinton?


Input: Consider Input: American Sage Kotsenburg won gold in the event at the Sochi Games in 2014. We brought him into the âOlympics Cornerâ today for his thoughts on how to watch. Keep scrolling to read that Q&A.
Throughout the Games  weâll occasionally bring someone in to help us better understand the Olympics. Today:  Sage Kotsenburg .
Four years ago in Sochi   Sage Kotsenburg  shocked the snowboarding world by winning slopestyle gold.  He  followed that up with what President Barack Obama told  him  was the âchillestâ interview of the Olympics.  Kotsenburg  has since stopped competing  so  he  wonât be in PyeongChang. But The Post caught up with  him  by phone during a recent film shoot in Italy to get  his  thoughts on this yearâs slopestyle event (8 p.m. Eastern time Saturday on NBCSN).
A: Three people that I would look for are an American kid  Red Gerard.  He âs absolutely crushing it right now. This course  when I saw it  I immediately thought Red can really do well here. I wouldnât be surprised to see  him  on the podium  if not up in the top five.
And then Mark McMorris  who got bronze last time around.  He  came back from a really  really bad injury  so Iâd like to see  him  do good  too. Weâve been good friends for a long time.  He âs crushing it  too.  He âs doing a really  really  really good job right now. Iâd like to see  him  up there.
Iâll give a prediction for gold: Itâs going to be Marcus Kleveland.  He âs from Norway.  He  has pretty much anything you want in a slopestyle course and more. So  if  he  puts down  his  run   he âll probably win or silver  Iâd guess.

Output: Olympics Day 2: PyeongChang awards the first medals of the Games


Input: Consider Input: ARI SHAPIRO  HOST:
 SHAPIRO : I understand you have a bit of news to begin this interview. Who's going to actually do the drawing?
 SHAPIRO : Should I offer you congratulations or condolences?
 SHAPIRO : Last week you tweeted  we should find a nice hat for the drawing. So at least it sounds like you're keeping a sense of humor about this.
 SHAPIRO : I would have no idea where to find a film canister in 2017. Does the state have a stash of them somewhere?
 SHAPIRO : (Laughter) It's one thing to use this technique to determine who's name appears first on a ballot  but there is so much at stake here determining who controls the Virginia House of Delegates. I know that this is the rule  but do you really think it's the best way to go about this?


Output: Control of Virginia's House Of Delegates Rests With 2 Film Canisters : NPR