In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

[Q]: Comment: "I've been to three county rodeos and two goat ropings but I've never seen **** like this."
[A]: Obscene


[Q]: Comment: You triggered a memory of a Washington Post magazine article of a man in suburban WDC who had his whole house wired to hear Rush Limbaugh in every room around the clock.  And he was "a devout Catholic!"
You'd think if he was "a devout Catholic" he might have the house wired to hear the gospel in every room around the clock.   But, no!
He got more of a rush from Limbaugh than the gospel, eh?
[A]: Non-obscene


[Q]: Comment: The 'Catholic' in NCR is not about being a faithful Catholic.  It designates that NCR specifically reports on all things Catholic or touching on Catholicism.  I wish people, even in jest, would stop bashing NCR for not being faithful to the magisterium.  It just shows their ignorance and bias about the use of the word 'Catholic' in this context.
[A]:
Non-obscene