In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Example Input: Comment: You see that Chimp -- you just can't help - try as you might - to L-L-L-L- LABEL!!!  Everybody do the Label-Label - it's the newest Craze!  So you label my comment a "rant." A rant? Rant?? Your response to my 'rant' is longer than my 'rant.' I think I have a label for that around here somewhere. Oh yes, here it is, my 'hypocrisy' label. Thanks for the slap. Are you happy?
Example Output: Non-sexual-explicit

Example Input: Comment: Iff'n y'all are a conservative and read the bahble the y'all can rape the little girls.
Example Output: Sexual-explicit

Example Input: Comment: The names of everyone charged with a crime is public.  That doesn't mean that every name is published in the media.  Generally, if it's a case of simple sexual assault where the victim and accused know each other (as opposed to aggravated assault where there is injury) the press don't report it unless there is a conviction.

But I can see the purpose of reporting sometimes.  For example, a case recently in my town where there was a serial rapist who assaulted 3 women at random -- the media reported his name with photo, because if there were other victims or witnesses, that would encourage them to come forward and help make sure the guy was taken off the streets, which he was.
Example Output:
Sexual-explicit