TASK DEFINITION: Categorize the comment on the basis of severe toxicity. If the comment is severely toxic output Yes, otherwise output No.
PROBLEM: You're confused. Here's how it works: the government exists as long as that flow of money is headed in the right direction -  subsidies, land to graze cattle on, a $550k SBA loan. That government is different from the government that says "No." The government that is trying to prosecute - or is it persecute? - the Bundys has no authority, because Ammon Bundy and his dad say so.

SOLUTION: No

PROBLEM: I read the article and here is the part I like......"The emerging answer is what Pickles calls “allowing users to control their own experience”, for example by using the mute button to screen out people they don’t like without that person knowing. Essentially it’s a way of allowing some tweeters to express divisive opinions without bothering others who won’t like it. One person’s right to free speech is matched by another’s right not to listen, as it might be at a party where you try to escape when trapped by the bore in the corner."...............Now that seems to me a much more favorable system than the one you are currently using. Give people a "mute" or "block button" that saves their preferences for who they don't want to see comments from. It can't get easier than that.

SOLUTION: No

PROBLEM: you would think a "science teacher" would have the proper education to understand that since these clowns have shut down logging it has ran our schools into the dirt in lost timber revenue. You would think this clown would have the education to understand this has placed a huge burden on home buyers, and in our outrageous property taxes this has created an emergency poverty, affordable housing crisis. No wonder Oregon public schools are an international embarrassment. Look who is teaching.

SOLUTION:
Yes