In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: insult and non-insult. Insult is any lanugage or act that is disrespectful or scornfully abusive.

[Q]: Comment: another idiot left winger of hate with no clue what the swamp is, see loser is the system, the career bureaucracy that has grown so large and interfering in society its holding back the economy, try again this time learn something before you look so stupid.
[A]: Insult


[Q]: Comment: Translation: Annoying inconvenience that happens to all air travelers eventually, happens to a black passenger.  NAACP claims it was because they were black.

(BTW - Don't they keep telling us that the "CP" term in their acronym is outdated terminology?)
[A]: Non-insult


[Q]: Comment: You want proof? I switched to being a private investor this year. Started selling my funds at the end of January: put more than 1/2 the money in high interest savings and term deposits and invested the rest in equities, starting in May. I had absolutely no experience when I started. Just did a whole lot of reading and talked to people who've been investing for years. Invested mainly in blue chips. For fun, I check the performance of my old funds on a daily basis. Here's where things stand today, 4 months after taking the plunge: 1) my old TFSA fund, 1.33% YTD; my new TFSA, 6.51%; 2) my old RRSP fund, 0.76 % YTD; I have two new RRSPs: one in a savings account at @ 2.10%, the other invested in the market is at 3.21%: the plan is to invest more in equities as I gain more experience; 3) my old RRIF fund is at minus 0.30% YTD; my new RRIF is earning 2.40%. So, in four months, and with no experience, my investments are doing better than with an advisor. Draw your own conclusions...
[A]:
Non-insult