In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.
--------
Question: Comment: Sue his ass amen! The PERMANENT fund dividend is based off a system that replenishes its self every year. If we don't have as good of a year then the PFD would be less. Based off a 5 year average. He wants to cut the money that we would be putting back into the economy to bail out the states fuck ups. How about the state pay for there own mistakes and stop with all the dump road projects like upgrading our high way to 6-8 lanes. We don't need that. Slow down take your time or drive a different rout. Or all the money there wasting on bridges to no where. Or there own salaries. Don't cut the PFD.

Answer: Obscene


Question: Comment: If there ever existed a good reason for Cdn taxpayers to subsidize the dairy industry (so-called 'supply-management'), that time has long since passed.  With any luck, Trump's lament will finally give our government reason to do what it's never had the backbone to undertake- end supply management.

Hate to say it, but we Canadians are beyond stupid on this one. Ignorance is not bliss.

Answer: Non-obscene


Question: Comment: Oh darn ... that's gonna work-out real well. :(

What the "heck" are the Liberals thinking?

Answer:
Obscene