We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

[EX Q]: We should protect gun laws because of crazy people who go out of control with them and guns these days are getting more advanced and easier to get
[EX A]: Valid

[EX Q]: Cornell is right when he suggests that an individual right theory was discussed, because that point was conceded and no one disputed that the black men who suffered under Cruikshank���s actions had an individual RKBA.
[EX A]: Valid

[EX Q]: Those are all the government, if it has gotten as far as the people, and the government (the president, the congress, the supreme court) has decided on gun control, who's going to arrest them for it?
[EX A]:
Valid