In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Q: Comment: Essentially he was a no show, if compared to how other presidents had participated. And I believe that at one of the prayer breakfasts he insulted Christians, did he not?  Can you do better than that example?  Something in the Denver Post, for example.

A: Non-obscene
****
Q: Comment: In the trade fight Christy Clark is the loud talking 90 pound weakling who is going to get the  crap kicked out of her by the  big bad American bully. 
Is this the way we want it? No, but this is the reality of the trade dispute. Nice try Clark but every one is aware that your bluster only amounts to a bucket of warm spit as far as the Americans are concerned.

A: Obscene
****
Q: Comment: Someone who posts Trump propaganda like you should be called something, but I thought I'd be struck off if I used the name that came to mind, so I went for 'troll' because it (a) describes someone who purposely posts porkies and (b) rhymes with the word I was going to use. How can you - unless you're what I described - seriously believe that this ridiculous situation hasn't arisen because Comey was getting close to the truth about the Trump group's connections with the Russians?! Really. And you might want to tell us about Sessions' admitted links and why Comey had to actually take over the case?!

A:
Non-obscene
****