Categorize the comment on the basis of severe toxicity. If the comment is severely toxic output Yes, otherwise output No.

Looker, the state pays less than 8% in total liquor sales to the exclusive contractors, hardly a cash cow after they pay for leases on buildings, payroll, taxes, etc. The average bottle sells for about $12 which means the contractor makes about .96 cents per bottle sold. As it stands, most contractors in markets with multiple stores are barely getting by. None would survive if the state allowed another 240 stores.
No

Xavier: Your derision of "the progression of money and resources from those who work to those who don't" sounds like you are against investment income. That's quite anti-capitalistic of you.
No

This article by giving a name and a face to a survivor, who was extremely damaged by continuous rape. This article educates the population to the damage rape of a child can do and why adults in trusted positions or extreme wealth get protection to continue doing it to children. Those that did and said nothing need to rethink how they enabled this rape of this young woman to continue. Educationing people about rape of children is honoring this woman and the enormous struggles she had due to those rapes.  Unless you have more than an opinion your judgmental views on this family serves no one and certainly doesn't education anyone on what to do if they find themselves in a situation where their child is being raped by a trusted family member, family friend or an influential person in the community.

No