In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine the neutral choice based on your inference from the statement and your commonsense knowledge. The neutral choice is a sentence that neither agrees nor disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3', corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence. If sentence X agrees with sentence Y, one's correctness follows from the other one. If sentence X disagrees with sentence Y, they can not be correct at the same time.
--------
Question: Statement: Consider Ehrlichman's reference to a certain left-wing Harvard professor, [first name unknown] Pomerantz, or whatever his name is, whose generosity towards the George McGovern campaign raises Nixon's suspicions. Choices: 1. Pomerantz's generosity raised Nixon's respect for him. 2. Pomerantz's generosity raised Nixon's doubts because of past experiences. 3. Pomerantz's generosity raised Nixon's doubts.

Answer: 2


Question: Statement: Legal services typically helps the poor. Choices: 1. It's unfortunate but legal services will not help the poor.  2. The poor are usually helped by legal services.  3. The poor are helped most by legal and social services. 

Answer: 3


Question: Statement: that's probably well worth it then it probably be worth it just to do away with the cost of the elections and uh put it in the hands of maybe one man who can at least get his party together Choices: 1. Doing away with the elections might have undesirable side effects. 2. There is no reason to do away with the elections. 3. It would make sense to save on the elections' costs and put it in the hands of one man who can unite his party.

Answer:
1