The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.
--------
Question: Context: 'Same here haha. Is water your lowest priority item too?' 'Yes. We think we have enough water for now.' 'Same here! I am in need of food more than firewood however as I am very hungry. '
Utterance: 'Me too. We have a bigger family and we will run out of food if we don't get some more.'

Answer: Yes


Question: Context: 
Utterance: 'Hello, how are you? 🙂, we are excited to go camping for 2 weeks. I was wondering, if its okay with you, if I can get all 3 waters? what are your thoughts? we have a large group, lots of kids, need the extra water for cooking, putting out camp fire, and keeping all of us warm at night. '

Answer: Yes


Question: Context: 'Hello, I'd like to get all of the water, an extra firewood and 2 of the food' 'Hi there.  That hardly leaves me with anything and doesn't really work for me.  I was hoping to make a campsite feast and get the extra food.  If we can do that, I'd be happy to give you all the water and that extra firewood.' 'I am a big guy, so I will need some more food, how about you give me an extra food while you hold on to two'
Utterance: 'I can't give you all the water if you take one of the food, I'm very sorry.  I could take 2 of the food and 2 of the water if we do it that way.  I really need cooking supplies if I want this trip to be productive for me - it's why I was coming.'

Answer:
No