In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Input: Consider Input: Comment: Yes, Comrade! Of course a PROGRESSIVE Income Tax where the sucessful minority pays all of the tax.

Why bother, why don't we just kill all the rich and take all of their money (just kidding). After all, that worked out so very well for the Russian peasants, didn't it?

Output: Non-obscene


Input: Consider Input: Comment: Yes - This is the essence of the case.

1. You have a violent man shooting and brandishing weapons to his family and neighbors
2. The Police were called by someone who knew Babb
3. Babb brandished a weapon in front of Police Officers - and probably threatened them
4. The police shot him
5. Now the family wants to get rich

This is an utter travesty - The police went to this house to deal with a threat, shot a guy who was a threat and NOT surrendering.

Again, I hope this family gets soaked for legal fees.

Output: Non-obscene


Input: Consider Input: Comment: Not surprisingly, you didn't understand the interplay between the comment to which I replied and my reply. No one talking specifically about being in the country illegally. Instead, the commenter said that if an illegal alien commits victimizes someone, the people (city of Denver) who provided him sanctuary (by making certain actions legal or illegal) will have blood on their hands. 

Again, no one is comparing alcohol to illegal immigrants. You must be part of the Trump tribe.


Output: Non-obscene