In this task, you're given a statement, and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence clearly disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3' corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.

Q: Statement: paid them his royalties every time the the song goes on but Choices:  1. Kanye West gets royalties every time his song goes on. 2. They paid his royalties when his song is played. 3. He wasn't getting any royalties for any of his songs.

A: 3
****
Q: Statement: For example, if the analysis indicated that the maximum feasible level for 1998 was at or closer to one of the lower prior year standards than it was to the 1997 standard, prescribing that lower standard would not necessarily be impermissible. Choices:  1. if the analysis indicated that the maximum level was lower prior to last years standards prescribing that lower standard would be impermissible. 2. The maximum level for 1998 was lower than the previous years. 3. if the analysis indicated that the maximum level was lower prior to last years standards prescribing that lower standard would not necessarily be impermissible.

A: 1
****
Q: Statement: It means that instead of blandly assuming less regulation is better than more or more competition is better than less, you have to study the specifics of each case very carefully. Choices:  1. Studying the specifics of every case is what it means. 2. If you don't study the specifics, you won't get it right. 3. There's no need to study the specifics, not at all.

A:
3
****