In this task, you are given books product reviews in English language. The goal is to classify the review as "POS" if the overall sentiment of the review is positive or as "NEG" if the overall sentiment of the review is negative.

[EX Q]: Accidental Fabrication . I haven't read Mr. Crawford/s book but I have read all 126 reviews.  Based on the reviews, not one soldier that served in Iraq gave the book a positive review.  That says those that know what serving in Iraq is like find the author something of a fraud.    It was pointed out that Mr. Crawford previously served in the regular active-duty army and therefore he should know what service in the National Guard is all about, including being recalled to active duty in a time of war.  You cannot over look this point.  Therefore, the rest of Mr. Crawford/s claims must be suspect if he misrepresents being an accidental soldier.    Drugs.  You don't do drugs in a combat zone.  I served in Vietnam and know that drugs and war do not mix very well.    I suspect that the people who praise this book have an anti-Iraq war bias.
[EX A]: NEG

[EX Q]: Readalbe but junky . Timeline is equivalent to a 99 cent taco. It's an indulgent bit of junk food.  Timeline starts with a Hillerman-esque scientist turning up in the middle of New Mexico - an intriguing idea, but goes to the land of mediocracy right after that filled with cartoon characters.  There are so many preposterous story elements that it's just really difficult to take seriously. The story is ever-predictable and ludicrous.  But, a 99 cent taco is worth the effort if you're real hungry.  Go back and read Andromeda Strain.
[EX A]: NEG

[EX Q]: Marxist Propaganda . This book is written by an avowed Marxist, and as such, neglects to mention the horrors of Soviet Russia.  Not only that, Ol' Eric discusses how horrible capitalism is, even though it was only because of capitalism that he was able to publish this waste of paper.  He does not spend much time at all on World War II, and has the gall to called Richard Nixon a horrible president (which he was) without heaping abuse upon Stalin or any other Communists.  The book also glosses over most historical events and goes for the "Big Picture" of history.  I hated this book.  Until I read it, I actually enjoyed learning about history.  Now I am not so sure
[EX A]:
NEG