Categorize the comment on the basis of severe toxicity. If the comment is severely toxic output Yes, otherwise output No.

Ex Input:
And today in Arizona, he is running 4th with 10% against Trump's 47%.  226,000 Trump votes and 48,000 Kasich.  And zero Arizona delegates.  

He's currently tied with Trump in Utah with both getting 15% against Cruz' 69%.

That isn't even "Also Ran".

Ex Output:
No


Ex Input:
Very educational!  I had heard of some of these, but not all of them.  Have also visited some of them.  A very interesting state and the history behind it leaves a lot to still learn.  Lived there for a little over 11 years, and loved what I saw.

Ex Output:
No


Ex Input:
To paraphrase Douglas Adams:  It has been said that Alaskan legislators are not above a little bribery and corruption in the same way that the sea is not above the clouds.

Alaska is not a corporation.  It's a government of the people being run by corporations through their representatives, who we vote for; otherwise known as a Kleptocracy.

Alaskans opted for this when we decided we didn't want to pay for our government, and gave that over to the oil industry, ignoring the time-honored maxim, "You get what you pay for."  The trouble is, the oil companies don't have the Alaskan Constitution written into their charters and are running the state for their own benefit, not ours.

So now we have a legislature that primarily represents Big Oil and that's exactly how the majority of Alaskan voters want it.

Ex Output:

No