Given a document, generate a short title of the document. The title should convey the main idea/event/topic about which the document is being written. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

Ex Input:
Mr. Myatt  used  his  knack for forgery and knowledge of art history to produce fake after fake  more than 200 in all. Fake Giacomettis. Fake Paul Klees. Fake Chagalls. Some sold for well over $150 000. (Only 80 or so have been recovered by the police; the rest are still at large  although  Mr. Myatt  said  he  did not know where.) But while  he  provided the art  it was the smooth-talking Mr. Drewe who drove the operation  cooking up the ersatz provenances and handling the sales. In 1999  Mr. Drewe was sentenced to six years in prison.  Mr. Myatt  who pleaded guilty to fraud and testified for the prosecution   served 4 months of a 12-month sentence.
 He  makes an unlikely ex-convict.
 He  is so well regarded in this Staffordshire community  where  he  is the organist and choir director at the local church  that when  he  was in jail   his  neighbors banded together and refurbished  his  kitchen. Visitors to a recent London exhibit of  his  work -- new works in the style of famous artists with the words "Genuine Fake" written in indelible ink on the back -- included the foreman of the jury that convicted  him ;  his  defense lawyer; and Jonathan Searle  the Scotland Yard detective who arrested  him  and who  when  Mr. Myatt  got out of prison  commissioned a portrait from  him  (as did a prosecutor in the case).
 Mr. Myatt  now gives lectures on art forgery alongside officers from Scotland Yard. At  his  London exhibit   he  sold everything  he  displayed -- 68 fake Miros  Picassos  Giacomettis and the like -- at prices from $875 to more than $8 000. (The cheapest picture was a  Myatt  original  titled "Ceci N'est Pas Une Magritte.") Besides the Van Gogh  Mr. Myatt's house is chock-full of other fake great works -- Matisses  Ben Nicholsons  Braques. His studio is filled with half-finished Monets. Now 60  trim  with thinning gray hair and a very dry sense of humor  he talks forthrightly  but with a residue of shellshock  about his life of crime.
AFTER studying art in college   Mr. Myatt  discovered  his  talent for forgery when  oddly enough   he  was working as a songwriter in the 1970's. ( His  song "Silly Games" hit No. 1 on the British charts  but that is another story.)  His  boss mentioned that  he  wanted to buy some Raoul Dufy paintings  then worth more than $100 000 each.
But  he  didn't need to. "I painted a couple of Dufys for  him   " Mr. Myatt  said.  His  boss paid Â£250 apiece  slapped them in Â£600-pound frames  and hung them up. "We all thought it was very funny  " Mr. Myatt  said.
The get-solvent-quick potential of the enterprise appealed to  him  later  when  he  was broke and wondering how to raise two children under the age of 3.  He  placed an advertisement in the satirical magazine Private Eye  offering legal forgeries for Â£250.
Everything was above board at first. Someone commissioned  Mr. Myatt  to paint his father  a retired navy commander  in the style of Joshua Reynolds. "We took a painting of some fabulous old guy gazing out with lots of medals  and just changed the face  " Mr. Myatt  said. " He  thought it was brilliant."
Then  Mr. Drewe  called  identifying  himself  as a physics professor who wanted to dazzle  his  girlfriend with  his  new art collection.  Mr. Myatt  painted more than a dozen pictures for  him   at Â£250 each. The enterprise crossed into illegality when  Mr. Myatt  painted the fake Albert Gleizes that  Mr. Drewe   without a word to  Mr. Myatt   passed off to Christie's as a family heirloom. From then on   Mr. Myatt  supplied the pictures and  Mr. Drewe  did everything else.  He  tipped cups of black coffee on the works to make them look old.  He  put them in period frames.  He  concocted false provenances and false explanations for how  he  came to have them.
 Mr. Myatt  stayed willfully ignorant  unquestioningly accepting whatever  Mr. Drewe  paid  him .
Meanwhile   Mr. Drewe  was getting weirder and weirder   Mr. Myatt  said  spinning stories about the royal family and Mossad. "And I thought  this is the stupidest thing I've ever done." Having made about Â£90 000 in all ( Mr. Drewe  made about Â£1.5 million  prosecutors said)   he  told  Mr. Drewe   he  had had enough.
Scotland Yard came calling a year later as part of its larger investigation into  Mr. Drewe   whose by then ex-girlfriend had turned him in.
MR.  MYATT  passed  his  jail time drawing portraits of inmates and guards. When  he  got out   he  married  his  second wife  Rosemary  who sings with  him  in the church choir and runs the increasingly successful Genuine Fakes business. Michael Douglas has bought the rights to his story.
Until then  there is a new wrinkle to contend with  he said: an unidentified forger who has been selling fake Myatts.

Ex Output:
After Stint of Crime Art Forger Sells Genuine Fakes


Ex Input:
You name it and Donald Trump has fought it. From Mitch McConnell to “fake news” to even his Holiness Pope Francis. But come Tuesday night Trump has a new opponent the likes of which he has never seen: Zari Adrianna Tomaz.
In fact  no one has ever seen a person like  Zari  before  at least not on American television. You see   Zari  is a Muslim superhero. And beginning Tuesday night   Zari  will become part of the cast of the CW’s DC’s Legends of Tomorrow.
Add to that   Zari  will be played by Iranian-American actress Tala Ashe. So Trump can decertify the Iranian deal all he wants  but he can’t stop  Zari .
As the show’s executive producer Marc Guggenheim made clear at a press conference when discussing  Zari  joining Season 3 of the series  it’s not a coincidence that the newest addition to the cast is Muslim in the time of Trump. Guggenheim joked  “You might have heard there was this election.” He added  “Not to get political  but something that we all gravitated toward in the writer’s room was making this character Muslim.”
Just so it’s clear   Zari  will not have Muslim-esque super hero skills like the ability to haggle endlessly over prices.  Zari  actress Tala Ashe—whom I’ve been friends with for several years—told me that  Zari  can fly and wears an ancient amulet that gives her the “power to blast and manipulate the wind.” (I wish she had the power to stop Trump from tweeting!)
But as Ashe notes  the character is not defined by simply being Muslim. Rather  Zari  is a hybrid American—just like so many of us in this country. Ashe explained  “I love that  Zari  is just as American as she is Muslim.”

Ex Output:
Today a Muslim TV Superhero Tomorrow a Muslim President!


Ex Input:
The impetus for the talks came in  Kim âs annual New Yearâs speech on January 1  when  he  proposed direct discussions with Seoul âover the issue of improving inter-Korean relations by our nation itself â with the goal to âdefuse the current military tension.â  Kim  also welcomed the upcoming Winter Olympics as a âgood occasion for demonstrating our nationâs prestige â and said  he  wanted to send a delegation.
But while the bilateral talks were widely praised in South Koreaâs media  the US media seemed like a deer caught in the headlights from the first announcement of the breakthrough. Unclear how to respond to a possible outbreak of peace  the press immediately zeroed in on the section of Kimâs New Yearâs speech where he declared that his ânuclear forces are capable of thwarting and counteringâ anything from the United States.  Kim  also reminded Washington that the ânuclear buttonâ is on  his  office desk âall the time.â
Although the Supreme Leader left out some of the harsh anti-US language heâs used in previous declarations  the implied threat became the story for nearly every US media outlet covering his New Yearâs speech. At CNN  for example  reporter Brian Todd went on the air to warn Wolf Blitzer that the prospect of talks was dangerous because it could mask a North Korean military attack during the Olympics. In some broadcasts  Kimâs offer to talk  and Moonâs quick endorsement  were barely mentioned.
 Kim âs reference to  his  nuclear arsenal also drew a typical response from President Trump.  He  took to Twitter to declare that  he   too  had a âbutton â but it was âmuch bigger & more powerfulâ than Kimâs.  His  childish taunt quickly led to speculation about  his  state of mind and fitness to be president  a topic that dominated the White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sandersâs first media briefing of the year.
Asked at a press briefing at Camp David about the potential for negotiations with Kim  he replied: âSure  I always believe in talking.â¦ absolutely I would do that.â Trump âappeared to be strongly indicating that he would join talks with North Korea after the high-level inter-Korean talks  if the conditions are right â South Koreaâs liberal Hankyoreh concluded.
In the lead-up to the talks in Seoul  the mood was close to jubilant. âHopes are high that inter-Korean relations will improve â Hankyoreh reported on January 4. âSince  Kim  delivered  his  New Yearâs address on Jan. 1  North Koreaâs actions have been completely aligned with the Southâs response.â
The pace was set early on by The New York Times  in a front-page story on January 1 posted literally hours after  Kimâs New Yearâs speech .  It  instantly became the leitmotif for media coverage throughout the week.
Behind Kimâs New Yearâs declaration âlies a canny new strategy to initiate direct talks with South Korea in the hope of driving a wedge into its seven-decade alliance with the United States â reported Choe Sang-Hun and David Sanger  the latter a recipient of dozens of US intelligence leaks about North Korea over the years.
In the Choe-Sanger article  the Times cited Robert Litwakâa senior vice president at the Woodrow Wilson Center for International Scholars who is well-known in Japan and Korea for his hard-right views on security issuesâto back its claim that Kim is seeking to âtake the side of the South Koreans  against President Trump.â He was then given a large block of space on the Timesâs January 3 op-ed page to spell out his grave concerns for the wayward South Koreans.
âWashington and Seoul should not take Mr. Kimâs bait â Litwak argued. âInstead  the North Korean offer should be put to the diplomatic test through a united Washington-Seoul front.â
Yet despite the clear signals of disapproval from US hard-liners   the Moon and Kim governments pressed on   saying  they  would soon embark on âworking-levelâ talks to discuss the details of the Northâs participation in the Olympics  the family visits  and âsolve bilateral issues among  themselves  without relying on outsideâ forces  according to the Joongang Daily.

Ex Output:

South and North Korea Hold Talks; US War Hawks Alarmed at Prospect of Peace