In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Ex Input:
Comment: If the Democrats had any brains they would never "block" a Supreme Court nominee just based on ideology.  If they are not qualified that is one thing but if they are not a left winger that is nonsense.  Maybe the Republicans should then block any leftie from the court who is otherwise qualified.  This kind of stuff is what ruins our entire system and makes people not trust it at all.  We want good judges who are not buried in ideology but can rule on the facts and the law.  How hard is that?  Often, it is much easier than checking a potential ruling against a certain ideology.  Try it!

Ex Output:
Non-sexual-explicit


Ex Input:
Comment: How the hell do you conclude that despising Trump means I voted for Trudeau?
As for this health bill proving that Trump is a genius, you have a few screws loose...

Ex Output:
Non-sexual-explicit


Ex Input:
Comment: Won't take long to fight them and thier jackboots off.
The biggest work will be piling the bodies fo burning.

Ex Output:

Non-sexual-explicit