Given a passage with a context and an answer, construct a question on the basis of the information present in the passage. Construct the question in such a way that (i) it is unambiguous, (ii) it is answerable from the passage, (iii) its answer is unique (iv) it answer uses text phrases from the passage. Avoid creating questions that (i) can't be answered correctly without actually understanding the passage and (ii) uses the same words or phrases given in the passage.

Q: Context: The present study investigated how parents and peers interact in promoting or delaying Dutch adolescents' sexual initiation and intention and focused specifically on parents as moderators of peer influence.", "Using a longitudinal design, two waves of online questionnaire data were collected among 900 Dutch adolescents (M = 13.8 years at T1), who were sexually inexperienced at baseline. At T1, participants reported on three types of perceived sexual peer norms: friends' sexual behaviors (descriptive norms), friends' sexual attitudes (injunctive norms), and experienced peer pressure to have sex. They also rated two parenting aspects at T1: the general quality of their relationship with parents and the frequency of sexuality-specific communication with their parents. Six months later, the participants reported on their experience with different sexual behaviors ranging from naked touching or caressing to intercourse and their intention to have sex in the next school year.", "Relationship quality with parents was significantly associated with both outcomes, with a higher relationship quality predicting smaller odds of sexual initiation and less intention to have sex. Two significant interaction effects showed that frequent sexual communication with parents significantly reduced the effects of sexually active friends and experienced peer pressure on adolescents' intention to have sex.
Answer: Our findings show that different types of sexual peer norms and both general and sexuality-specific parenting play an important role in the early stages of Dutch adolescents' sexual trajectories. Moreover, parent-adolescent communication about sexuality can function as a buffer for the sex-stimulating effects of sexual peer norms.

A: Do parents as moderators of longitudinal associations between sexual peer norms and Dutch adolescents ' sexual initiation and intention?
****
Q: Context: Before desflurane is advocated for patients undergoing neurosurgical procedures, it is necessary to determine the effect of desflurane on cerebral blood flow (CBF). In this study, CBF values are compared between desflurane and isoflurane at two doses. In addition, CBF reactivity to CO2 and the effect of prolonged exposure were compared between the two agents.', 'Cerebral blood flow measurements with intravenous 133Xe were performed in 24 patients undergoing craniotomy for mass lesions, randomized to receive either isoflurane or desflurane in oxygen and air. Cerebral blood flow was determined at 1 and 1.5 MAC concentrations at PaCO2 of 25 mmHg in the absence of surgical stimulation. Intraoperatively, with 1.25 MAC anesthesia, CBF was determined at target PaCO2 of 25 and 35 mmHg. In 15 patients, an additional measurement at 1.25 MAC was made before closure.', 'At 1.0 MAC, mean +/- SD CBF values for the desflurane and isoflurane groups were 18 +/- 2 and 20 +/- 3 ml x 100 g-1 x min-1, respectively. At 1.5 MAC, CBF values were the same for the two anesthetics; 17 +/- 3 ml x 100 g-1 x min-1 for isoflurane and 19 +/- 4 ml.100 g-1 x min-1 for desflurane. During 1.25 MAC anesthesia, there were no differences between groups, with CO2 reactivity 1.3 +/- 1.2 ml x 100 g-1 x min-1 x mmHg-1 for desflurane and 1.6 +/- 0.6 ml.100 g-1 x min-1 x mmHg-1 for isoflurane. There was no demonstrable decrease in CBF with prolonged exposure to either agent.
Answer: Desflurane and isoflurane are similar in terms of absolute CBF, the response to increasing doses, and the preservation of CO2 reactivity.

A: Do desflurane and isoflurane have similar effects on cerebral blood flow in patients with intracranial mass lesions?
****
Q: Context: Transcription factor HaDREB2 was identified in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) as a drought-responsive element-binding factor 2 (DREB2) with unique properties. HaDREB2 and the sunflower Heat Shock Factor A9 (HaHSFA9) co-activated the Hahsp17.6G1 promoter in sunflower embryos. Both factors could be involved in transcriptional co-activation of additional small heat stress protein (sHSP) promoters, and thus contribute to the HaHSFA9-mediated enhancement of longevity and basal thermotolerance of seeds.', 'We found that overexpression of HaDREB2 in seeds did not enhance longevity. This was deduced from assays of basal thermotolerance and controlled seed-deterioration, which were performed with transgenic tobacco. Furthermore, the constitutive overexpression of HaDREB2 did not increase thermotolerance in seedlings or result in the accumulation of HSPs at normal growth temperatures. In contrast, when HaDREB2 and HaHSFA9 were conjointly overexpressed in seeds, we observed positive effects on seed longevity, beyond those observed with overexpression of HaHSFA9 alone. Such additional effects are accompanied by a subtle enhancement of the accumulation of subsets of sHSPs belonging to the CI and CII cytosolic classes.
Answer: Our results reveal the functional interdependency of HaDREB2 and HaHSFA9 in seeds. HaDREB2 differs from other previously characterized DREB2 factors in plants in terms of its unique functional interaction with the seed-specific HaHSFA9 factor. No functional interaction between HaDREB2 and HaHSFA9 was observed when both factors were conjointly overexpressed in vegetative tissues. We therefore suggest that additional, seed-specific factors, or protein modifications, could be required for the functional interaction between HaDREB2 and HaHSFA9.

A:
Does the HaDREB2 transcription factor enhance basal thermotolerance and longevity of seeds through functional interaction with HaHSFA9?
****