In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Input: Consider Input: Comment: Yeah, I'e been living with this issue for most of my life. I'm happy to keep it alive.

There's no question that men who make sexual overtures from a position of power commit an abuse of power. And yes, it's exactly these blurry lines that become problematic.

When I was quite young (I may even have been a minor) I had a boss who got sexual with me when we were alone in a room. I rebuffed him, and he was a gentleman about it. I was really annoyed, but I continued to work at that job for a while. Was it an abuse of power? Yes. Was it a crime? Actually, legally it may have been. But I don't think of it as a crime. Women used to experience this kind of stuff all the time. I'd like to think the culture has changed a bit since then.

Unfortunately, as you may remember, I have also been a rape victim. So I give women who claim they've been raped the benefit of the doubt. But...at times, it's not the truth.

Output: Sexual-explicit


Input: Consider Input: Comment: And yet studies and academia notes that it is the conservative base that thrives on low information and avoidance of critical debate.    I guess that is why you prefer simplistic and negative attacks as opposed to reasoned debate. 

Let me guess:  
*Climate change is a hoax
* Economic disparity is not the system but lazy people from the left
* USA good and Trump amazing and China is pure evil
* Anything to the left of my views is Marxism, despite never having read Karl. 
etc. etc.

Output: Non-sexual-explicit


Input: Consider Input: Comment: Very offensive username..."Taksipak(Big Black Person) "Usuk"(Whale penis).


Output: Sexual-explicit