In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: insult and non-insult. Insult is any lanugage or act that is disrespectful or scornfully abusive.

[Q]: Comment: Thanks exactly what I was thinking. They keep dangling the carrot in front of them. Then slapping them when the take a step forward.
[A]: Non-insult


[Q]: Comment: I am 78 in poor health and pain MAID is just a political football decided on and approved based on vote getting politicians. Because of the conditions of bill  c-14 I will not go through the BS required to get approval I have a deer rifle with soft shells put it in a vise,  barrel in the mouth hit the trigger with a wooden stick. My friend did it. It  was quick and easy
[A]: Non-insult


[Q]: Comment: You're misappropriating your terms: You are saying "afraid of adult sexual relationships" means "sexually immature." Thus, if they are sexually mature, that would mean "not afraid of adult sexual relationships." And then conclude, if they are not afraid of adult sexual relationships, then men/priests "not afraid of adult sexual relationships (i.e. sexually immature) ought to engage in the above mentioned sex acts. Because you start with "immature" they (men/priests) should not. Your qualifier is that because they are immature they shouldn't, so then if they are "mature", they should. Your qualifying the behavior by the underlying qualifier: Only sexually immature men/priests, and which leaves out those not afraid of adult relationships out of the question if they shouldn't as well. Again, the statement should say: "Men_priests_and_not_engage_in_sex_acts_with_children_and_teens." I'm trying to help give you a better premise for your argument.
[A]:
Non-insult