Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.

Input: Consider Input: Commercial Fishermen, of which I used to be, will shoot Seals and Sea Lions that take fish out of the net. Some kill them for sport. Some kill everything and anything that eats "their" fish. Maybe not so much nowadays, but I saw plenty of it when I fished. I broke a lot of rifles when I saw it happening. You don't do that shit when I am on your boat!

Output: Yes


Input: Consider Input: I hope you don't have any neighbors within at least a half mile or so and have worked out the fields of fire in your place so you don't shoot your wife, kids, or dog due to a miss or over-penetration.   Unless you live in the middle of nowhere, a rifle, any rifle, but especially one with a small, high-speed projectile like a .223, is a terrible home defense weapon unless there's a herd of zombies coming down your street.   A pistol with enough stopping power to actually defend you has the same over-penetration problems.   A 12 gauge with 7 or 8 birdshot will kill an intruder just as dead at true self-defense distances as buckshot, a rifle, or a heavy pistol, and it won't destroy your house or kill your neighbors, family, or pets.

Output: Yes


Input: Consider Input: The Senate keeps sending a different messenger every 2 weeks with the same message. (Not our fault or were looking out for you) They do not have a clue so they play the same game over and over BLAME SOMEONE ELSE. I say lets play another game who is the next senator to write a B.S. Column and expect us to beleive them. Great leadership is not done by stating facts that are not correct!


Output: No