instruction:
Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
question:
So why can't ya just use your real name Ed? What are you afraid of? I get my great healthcare from the VA due to a disability from my service in Viet Nam. When I retired from 30 years working for Wilder Construction Company my COBRA was $850/month for a single healthy 55 year old. Jack Harris convinced me to get into the VA system and what do you know they gave me a 30% disability. Thanks Jack!
answer:
No


question:
Wow What a story...I'm serious. Great journalism. From my point of view the only issue with Vic was whether he could fairly judge a dispute between a man and a woman. Particularly a straight man. I could care less about his sexual preferences.
answer:
Yes


question:
So you enjoy reading the print newspaper, but because of online comments you might cancel your subscription? Why are you reading the comments when you find them so toxic?

If any bias (liberal or otherwise) is subtle, isn't that worse than being apparent?

I don't criticize the RG at every opportunity, nor do most commenters. This "story," however, is a sloppy piece of "journalism" and so the criticism has come out in full force. Do you think it's OK that there were fact errors and omissions? This was not a key story in most of our lives, I presume, but when there is a key story I'd want to be comfortable that we don't have similar gaps.
answer:

No