The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the self-need strategy, otherwise output No. self-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to create a personal need for an item in the negotiation, such as by pointing out that the participant sweats a lot to show preference towards water packages.

[Q]: Context: 'I should be fine, thank you. 🙂 It will be a little bit of work hauling all of my gear and supplies but after I set up camp, it will be smooth sailing. ' 'I'm thinking that we will be able to work out that deal.  I do have the water and that's my main thing I needed.' 'That's great, I'm glad we came to an agreement. '
Utterance: 'Everything looks good.  I'm glad we both got what we wanted.'
[A]: No


[Q]: Context: 'No it's not.  Since my fever is very high and my chills are very bad I'd appreciate you letting me have 2 firewoods and in exchange you could have all the extra food.' 'That is an interesting proposition.  What about the water?' 'I think if you let me have 2 waters I might survive this scourge!'
Utterance: 'I think that your reasons are very compelling.  I would also like to survive.'
[A]: Yes


[Q]: Context: 'my counter then is 2 water, 1 food, and 2 firewood for us and we are set 🙂' 'We're really going to need that extra firewood.  We'll need the heat source, but also for cooking.  It a big deal that I get the extra wood, I hope you will understand why I need it.' 'my people feel like they need 1 extra of something or else they will throw a fit ☹️'
Utterance: 'No fits!!  They're getting that extra water they really want.  I am sure they'll be OK with giving a group with kids a little extra firewood to make this camping trip awesome for them'
[A]:
No