We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Ex Input:
Sent1: If someone is bad enough to be considered for the death penalty then they must have had sure evidence that they are guilty if they are then they shouldn't deserve the right to live among people they could kill
 Sent2: When they are about to be shot just think what would be happening, some unlucky person would be dealing with the fact that they were going to have to take someone's life.

Ex Output:
Not similar


Ex Input:
Sent1: The death penalty has never been shown to be a deterent to murder.
 Sent2: There is absolutely ZERO evidence that the death penalty deters crime.

Ex Output:
Similar


Ex Input:
Sent1: The death sentence has been used since the beginning of the United States, and rarely, if ever, has there been an occurrence in which someone avenges the death of a murderer or rapist.
 Sent2: As for the death penalty, although it should be used more often on murders and serial killers, even rapists, it probaly isnt neccary to use it on robbers.

Ex Output:

Not similar