In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

Q: Comment: nobody else in the world would call any Hispanick "white".  Liberals know it makes Hispanicks feel proud to refer to them as "white" and Hillary Clinton as "non-Hispanick white".  But when you deport a Hispanick, they then claim we are doing it because we don't want "non whites in the USA".

A: Identity-attack
****
Q: Comment: The economy has been on a record upswing, building the Permanent Fund to where it is today ... and sooner or later, it will fall into a record downswing.  There may be no Permanent Fund earnings for some years to come, it may even lose over half of its value ... and then what?  The fund lost 3 billion in January, but was rescued in a temporary market correction.  Our legislators are foolish children, playing with fire ... and it is the people who will get burned.  On top of that, the fund lost two of the most competent managers it has ever had, who had overseen the biggest single growth in the history of the fund ... all because the legislators saved a few pennies by not giving them a decent raise or bonus.

A: Non-identity-attack
****
Q: Comment: I suppose you're right. If it ends up being a Muslim who carried out the attack we can just call it muslim on muslim shooting. or Muslim Terrorist attack?

A:
Identity-attack
****