In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.
--------
Question: Comment: That there is a very serious- not to mention very racist- anti- white movement in western society today is undeniable. Mere months ago there was a BLM anti-Trump, pro-immigration protest in down town Toronto where the leaders of that march called for the armed take over of Quebec and the armed seizure of arable lands all across Canada by non-white people. Check it out, the video is there to see. Its the same one where they called Justin Trudeau of all people a "white supremacist". Go figure haha. Very easy indeed.

Answer: Non-obscene


Question: Comment: "It does seem a little hypocritical for Dogwood to be complaining about Kinder Morgan playing a role in the B.C. election through its donations to the BC Liberals, when it is receiving money from the United States to fight for causes aligned with interests there. "
In one case, foreign interests donate money to advocacy groups.
In the other, foreign interests donate money to a political party whose members currently form the provincial government. 
Not even remotely equivalent, Gary, and tf. hardly hypocritical of Dogwood to complain about it.

Answer: Non-obscene


Question: Comment: Ignoring Richard Nixon's Southern Strategy that brought the white Southern Democrats over to the Republican Party, aren't you?

Answer:
Non-obscene