In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: toxic and non-toxic. Toxicity is defiend as anything that is rude, disrespectful, or unreasonable that would make someone want to leave a converation.
--------
Question: Comment: CommonWetDreams.org is a completely lame citation.

Try some hard facts instead, It was desperate and huge turnout by white evangelicals in the "firewall" states that put Trump over. 

These fanatics were hardly going to vote for Sanders, who was even more aligned with the "Black Devil" in the White House.

Clinton won the vote of the lower income segment and all race/cultural minorities. Sanders wouldn't have done better.

-- Paul

Answer: Non-toxic


Question: Comment: You are going to die soon, sell ALL your stuff, party, give lots of it away, friends, family, strangers and charity.  Don't be stupid.

Answer: Toxic


Question: Comment: Yes. I've been to most of them. And yep, big job. I've notice a dramatic difference in living standards between isolated reserves and those you can drive to. There are many issues. Do you have any specific ones you want to point out with possible solutions? Or just more empty rhetoric.

Answer:
Non-toxic