We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

Ex Input:
I'll freely admit that there is a larger jump between guns and nukes than knives and guns, but there is still a direct difference in lethality.

Ex Output:
Valid


Ex Input:
Australia's laws mandating that all guns be kept locked up, and the lack of the ability to claim self-defense when shooting a violent home invader, has made Australia a very dangerous place to live or visit.

Ex Output:
Valid


Ex Input:
You can't push for mandatory training and license requirements, such restrictions have been found unconstitutional with regard to other rights, and thanks to Heller and McDonald the same standard applies to the Second Amendment.

Ex Output:

Valid