In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

Comment: Oh, those 'naughty' BC Liberals! First, Christy shrugs and says, "The BC voters don't care corrupt we are.", then disappears until the whole thing blows over (she hopes). Then her deputy crime boss, Rich Coleman comes out and throws their donors under the bus. If that wasn't bad enough, Suzanne Anton, Attorney General, stands up in QP and throws their lobbyists under the bus.  Who's next?
Non-identity-attack

Comment: Are you kidding me. Trans gender bathroom bill, westboro, god hates fags, attempting to pint gays as pedophiles, painting gays as the cause of the aids epidemic, and constantly judging everyone through a very negative lens has been the religious rights mode of attack.

Then you dare come on here and again attack people that call out intolerance. It is not intolerance to point out hate, and your side peddles in hate of everything they didn't like.

Your side has spent years shouting down and name calling anyone that doesn't agree, then you come here and blame the other side. Par for the course, I guess.

Party of Personal Responsibility or is it Party of Her Emails now?
Identity-attack

Comment: Bill maher could have told us she was not up to it. Check out her antics on his show, on youtube. My ears still hurt from her screaming at him.

Non-identity-attack