In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Q: Comment: 100yrs from now... 

"ah yes, ol' standoff szajkowski, i remember him well.  boy, nobody could pull off a standoff like joe; he had a real talent for it.  so talented in fact that he began teaching standoff tactics 101 at the local community college.  tell that guy to do something and he'd stonewall your ass til' the cows came home.  ya know, a lot of people didn't know this about joe, but he was a phenomenal badminton player too.  yep, i didn't believe it either when i first heard.  but it's true.  they used to call 'em ol' shuttlecock szajkowski.  wonder whatever happened to that standoff-havin' shuttlecock whackin' crazy sonofabitch?"

A: Obscene
****
Q: Comment: It is truly sad to see that some people do not classify certain groups of people as subhuman based on their ethnicity.
Indeed to your very good point - it is illegal to regard people of non-white ethnicity as full human.

A: Non-obscene
****
Q: Comment: Never mind the "look" - he"is"  very amateurish because that's what he is, an amateur drama teacher with good looks and name .  Nothing  more and nothing  less.

A:
Non-obscene
****