instruction:
Categorize the comment on the basis of obscenity. If the comment is obscene output Yes, otherwise output No.
question:
Yes, it's a good idea to slow down and drive safely in these neighborhoods. No it's not a good idea to put up fake signs on this scale, you're not much better than graffiti artists. 

Because of the tactics involved people who would otherwise be supportive are talking about tearing these signs down. It's one thing to have a good idea and shop it around to the city and neighbors it's quite another to become a self-appointed arbiter. 

"Agent 1" is simply a coddled child unable to come to terms with how grown-ups approach issues in an adult world. This idiot simply chose to alienate everyone rather than take the time to develop a long-lasting solution.
answer:
Yes


question:
Thomas Frank, in his recent book "Listen Liberal", disputes the idea that Obama was so constrained by the Republicans that he couldn't do more. He didn't have to put Wall Street execs in charge of his economic program. He also didn't have to leave troops in Afghanistan and kill people in a number of countries with drones. Or make war on Libya, as urged by Clinton. I don't think Obama really wanted to do more. Like the Clintons, Obama is an elite limousine liberal, comfortable with the way things are. After all, it worked for him.
answer:
No


question:
Dinesh D'Souza:  “I had no idea that it is considered wrong in Christian circles to be engaged prior to being divorced.”
answer:

No