TASK DEFINITION: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.
PROBLEM: Comment: Heck, why don't we just do away with saying "human"..and just note the birth of a "being".  Ridiculous.....

SOLUTION: Non-identity-attack

PROBLEM: Comment: You are ridiculously uninformed. For your sake, sorry the Gov. is going to veto the LIO Taj Mahawker that you said we should buy a few weeks back, which tells me all I need to know about your ability to rationalize coherently and responsibly.

SOLUTION: Non-identity-attack

PROBLEM: Comment: I think Sydney is correct, most people who work in the judicial branch are psychopaths with little to no empathy for their neighbors or the people they are supposedly charged with protecting. that is exactly what the job requires, they are becoming the bullies with no worries, as they are given immunity under the law for their actions. its a conflict of interest for the state prosecutor to charge them with a crime. why? because at that point the state becomes liable and could face civil claims (money) just as they are now facing with these claims.

SOLUTION:
Non-identity-attack