Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.

[EX Q]: Jade: "modesly" is actually an innovative contraction peculiar to discussion of housing patterns, urban demographics and inner-city residential development.  Its etymology is traced to discussion of "more densely" developed urban centers especially in reference to residential units.  In today's usage you might read "modesly" devloped city centers generally promote more affordable urban residential tenancy.   Indeed, it is an esoteric term and it's not surprising it causes some confusion.  

You may be thinking of "scrupub", which, in contemporary use, refers to policies and legislation designed to benefit a small special interest group by "screwing the public."
[EX A]: No

[EX Q]: All people had to do was read the pamplet that was mailed out explaining SB21 before it was voted on to see it was terrible. Get rid of SB21 now! Dont take it personal big oil, its just bad business. Its  very ignorant to put it bluntly.
[EX A]: Yes

[EX Q]: I agree that Trooper should have been fired.  I suspect Monegan did to.  However, the union would have filed a wrongful termination suit against the state, and that Trooper would have made a ton of money off being fired.  Is that what you want?  The union has rules on how and when Troopers can be fired.  If that state doesn't follow those rules, the employee ends up winning, even if they suck.
[EX A]:
Yes