In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence can be inferred from the statement. Incorrect choices change the meaning in important ways or have details that are not mentioned in the statement. Indicate your answer as 1,2, or 3 corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.

[Q]: Statement: That is, it had a much flatter income distribution, so that people had much more sense of sharing a common national lifestyle. Choices:  1. A much flatter income distribution for a common national lifestyle. 2. A much higher income distribution for a common national lifestyle. 3. The income distribution was a low as 20%.
[A]: 1


[Q]: Statement: As for the statement relating to the destruction of the will, the prisoner had formerly practiced at the Bar, and was perfectly well aware that the will made in his favour a year before was automatically revoked by his stepmother's remarriage.  Choices:  1. The prisoner tried to have the will remade to be more favour some to himself. 2. The prisoner knew that the will made in his favour the prior year was revoked when his stepmother remarried. 3. The prisoner was once a lawyer before he was captured.
[A]: 2


[Q]: Statement: For example, one ongoing project (funded by the Abell Foundation) works to decrease employment barriers to 45,000 non-custodial fathers in Baltimore whose child-support obligations (especially money owed to the state) exceed their ability to pay. Choices:  1. Parents that don't have their children live with them must pay child support.  2. The project aims to get fathers custody of their children. 3. The project is made to get rid of employment barriers for fathers that don't have custody of their children.
[A]:
3