Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
--------
Question: Fact is, Oregon "sits on a two-legged stool." Solely relying on income and property taxes, with no sales tax, is foolhardy. Then-- to an already wobbly position-- cut off a chunk of one of the legs (thank you, Measure 5)---- crazy!
But that's where Oregon's citizens find themselves.
So with citizens unwilling to pay any more taxes, and with an education and infrastructure system in dire need of funding, where do legislators turn?
Many of these corporations market products regionally, nationally, and internationally. The costs of any pricing increases, therefore, will be spread out over a very large population, not necessarily just Oregonians. In an imperfect system, it indeed appears to be the best alternative.

Answer: Yes


Question: Cricket brownies with "organic gluten-free flour and organic Peruvian cocoa powder."

How very progressive and Earth-friendly!

"The products are expensive..."

And, like all  progressive and Earth-friendly silliness,  this stuff is only for the wealthy.

Answer: No


Question: This was a conservative, right wing government 15 years ago that passed this law.  The Republicans and gung ho on that 2nd amendment and that is fine, but the 4th amendment.  They would repeal it if they could.  They do not care about civil liberties OR the rule of law.  Blame Obama for continuing it, but even if he vetoed this law when it was up for "renewal", it would have been overridden.

Answer:
No