In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Example Input: Comment: I guess you'd call me a liberal because I tend to favor governmental intervention when "private" behaviors pose serious risks to others.  In this case, however, I swing to the Right.  Assuming that Mr. Jarlstrom's primary "transgression" was to write that he knew something about "engineering" (a generic term), the Board's crusade against him is inane., to say the least.  That would be like me (a retired political scientist) being fined for  illegally "practicing law" because I teach a course in mediation as an effective legal tool.  The case against Mr. Jarlstrom appears to be utter nonsense.  Perhaps one should attack Board members for their lack of proper qualifications.
Example Output: Non-obscene

Example Input: Comment: DOJ should open an investigation into James Comey misconduct while FBI Director. That would put his incompetence and self serving bias out there and help get the public behind his firing. House of Reps will not vote for impeachment if it hurts the re-election campaigns of the members.
Example Output: Non-obscene

Example Input: Comment: The "specific message" he is against that he will make wedding cakes for everyone. He wont, obviously. He only wants to make them for straight couples. That seems to literally be his only requirement. Which, is textbook discrimination.

Again, the cake they were asking him to make was a normal wedding cake.  No writing on it.  He is suggesting that just the process of making a cake that is used in a gay wedding, goes against his beliefs.  So, if he can say that, why couldn't anyone else say they wont sell someone a product because they dont agree with the couple being interracial?  Or Jewish?  Or Muslim?  Its a slippery slippery slope. 

Making a cake that "promotes" something is a little different, in my opinion.  That would include writing or specific decorations.  For Halloween, for example, "Happy Halloween" or a picture of a Jack O Lantern.  For THOSE things, you cannot force an artist to create something they are against.  I agree with that.  

But this situation is different.
Example Output:
Non-obscene