In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Ex Input:
Comment: While I agree with the basics of your thought (the Legislature failed us), to think the chief thief would not have vetoed the PFD is foolishness. That man wants our PFD, and nothing will stop him. The Legislature could have hacked the budget with a light saber, and Walker would have still capped our PFD.

Ex Output:
Non-sexual-explicit


Ex Input:
Comment: Chuckie Schmuck at it again. Another of HiLIARy's playmates can't handle the truth. Born loser

Ex Output:
Non-sexual-explicit


Ex Input:
Comment: "They should keep the people from coming here and we should tax the heck out of services like Western Union who profit from the billions making it back to Mexico. That will pay for the wall in no time."

The funny part will be when Mexico recovers its cash by voiding all U.S. copyright and patent laws and starts handing out MS Windows, "pirated" Game of Thrones DVDs, and $10k pharmaceutical drugs for $1. Suddenly, 50 million Americans will feel the urge for a "Mexican holiday"! Should take about a month to recover every peso.

No negotiation needed! Your train of thought is like rationalizing bedtime with a toddler.

(But keep throwing out the ridiculous ideas, Mr. Trump. You're a winner whatever the fake news says!!)

Ex Output:

Non-sexual-explicit