Given a document, an entity and its sentiment towards the entity, verify if it is the correct sentiment towards the entity. Answer should be yes or no. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].
--------
Question: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Brad Childress is Neutral . Former Vikings coach Brad Childress  had a brief retirement â about a month â before being lured to  his  hometown team. The Bears are expected to hire  him  as an offensive consultant. SiriusXMâs Adam Caplan first reported the move.
 Childress   an Aurora native who attended Marmion Academy  spent the last five seasons on the Chiefs staff with Nagy  serving as a spread game analyst  offensive coordinator and assistant head coach last season.  Childress  has a long history as an NFL quarterbacks coach and offensive coordinator under Andy Reid with the Eagles before spending five years as the Vikings head coach.
 Childress   61  retired from the Chiefs after  they  were eliminated in the wild-card round of the playoffs. In an appearance on âThe Mully & Hanley Showâ on WSCR-AM 670   Childress  was asked if Nagy could talk  him  out of retirement.
âYou never know â  he  replied. âI never say never.â
Nagy has talked about  his  belief in quarterback Mitch Trubisky  and  Childress  was also very upbeat about the second-year quarterback.
âI think those 12 games (of starting experience as a rookie) are really going to serve  him  well â  Childress  said. âItâs not ideal that you change your coordinator  but looking at  his  aptitude and watching  him  in the seven hours we had  him  (on a pre-draft visit)   he âll jump in the (play) book   he âll know what is going on.  He  will be able to get some of the fine points  and I just think youâll continue to see  him  grow and blossom.
Now  Childress   who began  his  coaching career at Illinois in 1978  will be on board to watch Trubisky develop.

Answer: yes


Question: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Luke Cage is Neutral . Netflix just published the new âDefendersâ series  the culmination of several years of work by Marvel Television to get Marvel into prestige serial storytelling. (We have to find a new word for this: we canât call it âTVâ much longer.) The Marvel-Netflix deal now includes two seasons of âDaredevil â and one each of âJessica Jones â âLuke Cage â and âIron Fist.â Thatâs 65 episodes  plus the new eight-episode âDefenders â around 50 minutes each. Thatâs more than 60 hours on screen in the last two years.
Now  you can blame whatâs wrong with âThe Defendersâ on the Marvel shtick: America has no enemies but its own divisions. The heroes inevitably fight each other. That could work if you had writers who understood Americaâs divisions  but itâs disastrous when all youâve got is pettiness and liberal identity politics. âThe Defendersâ does better than any Marvel movie to give you thrilling fights  however. At least Daredevil does;  Luke Cage  is also pretty good; the other two were deficient to begin with and apparently not getting better.
There is a deep argument hidden somewhere in this mess of a story. But to see it develop  the viewer has to ask himself: why is Daredevil so scared of his own heroism  which might lead him to kill people? Heâs a Catholic  of course. And weâre reminded of that in an important scene in a confessional. But whatâs the import of that fact? Why is  Luke Cage  telling a grieving mother  he  learned about the power of prayer from  his  own father?  He âs an heir to MLKâs sacrifice and hope  as we know from  his  own show  but why does that matter here? The evil guys  too: why is their quest for immortality so evil or wrong? We all want to live as long as possible  anyway!
Instead  we get this mess of American social pathologies of individualism and evil ninjas. This is worthless for articulating the fight between two worlds  one dedicated to equality  the other inequality. Maybe future stories will get better. A friend pointed out that thereâs a lot of Christianity in the first season of âLuke Cage â and the second season is supposed to be more serious about civil rights. He also pointed out another sign of hope: civil rights are connected with the Second Amendment.
In my previous essay  I said high-flying civil rights rhetoric collapses in âLuke Cage.â Behold: in an emotional moment mid-season  Luke Cage tells a young black man-turned-criminal about Crispus Attucksâthe first man killed in the Boston Massacre of 1770  and thus  the first martyr of the American Revolution. He was black. We see his legacy exploited by a gangster and a politician  who abuse Harlem while pretending to save it. Unlike Attucks  they always put themselves first  because when they were poor  weak  and needed protection  nobody put them first.
 Luke Cage  takes a shot to the head from that stupid  scared young criminalâbut it makes no dramatic sense  with a literally bulletproof hero.  Luke Cage  is no Crispus Attucks. Our stories fake sacrifice  and thus betray our deepest awareness of our neediness. Thatâs because of our politics and our fear of death.

Answer: yes


Question: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Ben Lipkowitz is Positive . Five years ago  Ben Lipkowitz  who is now 28   was living with some friends in Bloomington  Ind.  and  he  found  himself  wondering how much time  he  spent doing one of  his  roommates’ dishes. Lipkowitz had a handheld electronic datebook that  he  purchased on a trip to Tokyo   and on May 11  2005  at 2:20 p.m.   he  started using it to keep a record of  his  actions. Instead of entering  his  future appointments   he  entered  his  past activities  creating a remarkably complete account of  his  life. In one sense this was just a normal personal journal  albeit in a digital format and unusually detailed. But the format and detail made all the difference.  Lipkowitz  eventually transferred the data to  his  computer  and now  using a few keyboard commands   he  can call up  his  history.  He  knows how much  he  has eaten and how much  he  has spent.  He  knows what books  he  has read and what objects  he  has purchased. And of course   he  knows the answer to  his  original question. “I was thinking I was spending an hour a day cleaning up after this person ” Lipkowitz says.  He  shrugs. “It turned out it was more like 20 minutes.”
These men all know that their behavior is abnormal. They are outliers. Geeks. But why does what they are doing seem so strange? In other contexts  it is normal to seek data. A fetish for numbers is the defining trait of the modern manager. Corporate executives facing down hostile shareholders load their pockets full of numbers. So do politicians on the hustings  doctors counseling patients and fans abusing their local sports franchise on talk radio. Charles Dickens was already making fun of this obsession in 1854  with his sketch of the fact-mad schoolmaster Gradgrind  who blasted his students with memorized trivia. But Dickens’s great caricature only proved the durability of the type. For another century and a half   it  got worse.
Or  by another standard  you could say  it  got better. We tolerate the pathologies of quantification — a dry  abstract  mechanical type of knowledge — because the results are so powerful. Numbering things allows tests  comparisons  experiments. Numbers make problems less resonant emotionally but more tractable intellectually. In science  in business and in the more reasonable sectors of government  numbers have won fair and square.
I recently received an e-mail message from a 26-year-old filmmaker named Toli Galanis  who keeps track of about 50 different streams of personal data  including activities  health  films watched and books read  the friends he talks with and the topics they discuss. While Galanis acknowledged that he gets pleasure from gathering data and organizing  it  intelligently   it  was a different aspect of his report that caught my attention. “I know that immediately after watching a bad movie I am more apt to be negative about my career prospects as a filmmaker ” he wrote  explaining that tracking has made him better able to detect the influence of seemingly trivial circumstances on his mood and decisions.
The idea that our mental life is affected by hidden causes is a mainstay of psychology. Facility in managing the flow of thought and emotion is a sign of happiness and good adjustment. But how is  it  done? Nearly every therapeutic prescription involves an invitation to notice  to pay attention. Once we have a notion in our sights  we can attack  it  with an arsenal of tools: cognitive  psychoanalytic  even spiritual. But none of these will tell us if we’ve missed something. You may simply have failed to notice a debilitating habit  a negative correlation  a bad influence.

Answer:
yes