In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine the neutral choice based on your inference from the statement and your commonsense knowledge. The neutral choice is a sentence that neither agrees nor disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3', corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence. If sentence X agrees with sentence Y, one's correctness follows from the other one. If sentence X disagrees with sentence Y, they can not be correct at the same time.

Statement: Particular models, strategies, and approaches that have proven successful in one state may be useful to others, while the progress of the national initiative to build state justice communities as it has played out across the country provides some valuable information for national leaders and institutions. Choices: 1. To this day not one model, strategy nor approach has proven successful. 2. Some models that have proven successful have the opportunity to work well for another state also. 3. A lot of the time the models do not work from state to state however.
3

Statement: Dated in Tennessee for a prisoner of war June, 1865. Choices: 1. Dated in Tennessee was a new doctor to take care of the town.  2. A POW was expected in Tennessee June 1865. 3. The prisoner was coming from Britain.
3

Statement: (Well, for Skadden it's not such a mystery, considering that Slate is part of the name of the D.C. law firm Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher &amp; Flom.) Choices: 1. Slate is part of a law office's name. 2. Slate is not related to the law firm it shares a name with. 3. Slate is just a law firm.

2