instruction:
Given a document, generate a short title of the document. The title should convey the main idea/event/topic about which the document is being written. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].
question:
Taylor Swiftâs lawyers  are trying to shake off claims that the âShake It Offâ singer stole lyrics with a new court motion.
 Swift  was sued in September by songwriters Sean Hall and Nathan Butler  who created the song âPlayas Gonâ Playâ for the girl group 3LW in 2001. The duo claimed that  Swift  stole their lyrics and used them in her famous hit single âShake It Off.â
On Wednesday  the singerâs lawyers asked the federal judge to dismiss the copyright lawsuit against  Swift  and argued that the concepts of players playing and haters hating are common music phrases and âpublic domain clichÃ©sâ that canât be claimed as copyright  according to Variety.
 Swift  used the familiar phrase in the chorus of her song which says  âPlayers gonna play  play  play  play  play  and haters gonna hate  hate  hate  hate  hate.â
âThere can be no copyright protection in âplayas  they gonna play and haters  they gonna hate â because it would impermissibly monopolize the idea that players will play and haters will hate â  Swift âs lawyers said. âPlaintiffsâ claim to being the only ones in the world who can refer to players playing and haters hating is frivolousâ¦ Providing a copyright monopoly in the phrase would prevent others from sharing the idea that players play and haters hate.â
To further prove their argument   Swift âs legal team went on to cite other examples of famous songs that use the âplayerâ and âhaterâ phrase such as âDreamsâ by Fleetwood Mac  in which the song says  âPlayers only love you when theyâre playing â and âPlaya Hater â by the Notorious B.I.G.  where the phrase âplaya  playa haterâ is used as the part of the songâs chorus.
answer:
Taylor Swift's lawyers work to dismiss 'Shake It Off' copyright lawsuit


question:
Neighbors walk under the rain past a washed out road in Alajuelita on the outskirts of San Jose  Costa Rica  Thursday  Oct. 5  2017.  Tropical Storm Nate  formed off the coast of Nicaragua on Thursday and was being blamed for at least 17 deaths in Central America as  it  spun north toward a potential landfall on the U.S. Gulf Coast as a hurricane over the weekend. (Moises Castillo/Associated Press)
MANAGUA  Nicaragua â  Newly formed Tropical Storm Nate  was blamed Thursday for at least 22 deaths across Central America as  it  dumped rain across the region on a path that would carry  it  toward a potential landfall on the U.S. Gulf Coast as a hurricane over the weekend.
The U.S. National Hurricane Center said  the storm  could cause dangerous flooding by dumping as much as 15 to 20 inches (38 to 50 centimeters) of rain as  it  moved over Honduras  with higher accumulations in a few places.
In Nicaragua  Nateâs arrival followed two weeks of near-constant rain that had left the ground saturated and rivers swollen. Authorities placed the whole country on alert and warned of flooding and landslides.
answer:
Tropical Storm Nate blamed for 22 deaths; threatens US coast


question:
One quick way to understand the agreement British Prime Minister Theresa May struck with the European Union on Friday â which effectively guarantees that the United Kingdomâs exit from the trading bloc will change so little that there will be no need to police its new border with the EU in Ireland â is to look at how very unhappy it has made pro-Brexit extremists.
Farage  Banks  and other âBrexiteersâ have spent months talking up the prospects of a free trade deal with the United States as a replacement for EU membership. But  as Irelandâs leader Leo Varadkar pointed out  by committing the U.K. to keeping its trade standards in line with the EU   May  had made  it  nearly impossible to strike free trade agreements (so-called FTAs) with nations like the U.S.  which have more lax health and safety regulations.
Congratulations to  Theresa May  for agreeing to absolutely everything the EU requested from the start but taking 8 months of potential trade negotiating time to do it â Matt Zarb-Cousin (@mattzarb) December 8  2017
 Theresa May  has basically just scrolled straight to the end of the document and ticked the box saying  she  has read the Brexit Terms and Conditions. â John O'Farrell (@mrjohnofarrell) December 8  2017
May  who voted against Brexit in last yearâs referendum  now faces the tricky task of holding on to the support of the so-called Brextremists in  her  Conservative party during the final phase of trade negotiations that could result in the U.K. leaving the EU but getting a form of associate membership  like that enjoyed by Norway or Switzerland. Since  she  took office after the referendum   May  appears to have kept the peace in  her  divided party by stringently refusing to propose any concrete plans for what kind of deal  she  is hoping to strike with the E.U. The fact that  her  party has been avoiding hard conversations  intent on satisfying the narrow majority of Britons who voted to leave the EU without having ever developed an actual plan for how to protect its economy after Brexit  was reinforced on Wednesday when two senior ministers admitted as much in testimony to parliamentary committees. David Davis  who leads the newly created ministry for Exiting the European Union  was asked to provide details on the dozens of impact assessments he previously said his department had produced to determine how leaving the EU would affect up to 57 sectors of the British economy. To the surprise of many observers  Davis  who had previously described the studies as going into âexcruciating detail â suddenly admitted that no such papers existed.
answer:

British Deal With European Union Shatters Illusions of Pro