In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: insult and non-insult. Insult is any lanugage or act that is disrespectful or scornfully abusive.

[Q]: Comment: I thought esoterica was your word? And yes, I have read Augustine on curiositas. But these discussions have nothing to do with the alleged incident, which seems to be a nothing. The cops are alleged to have been called, are alleged to have seen something, we know not what, and the tabloids allege with no evidence that the Vatican is rocked by the incident. You seem to be withdrawing even your earlier details about several groups of men involved in sex, etc. Now I am told to google if I want to know more!
[A]: Non-insult


[Q]: Comment: How about more obnoxious bike lanes while they're at it!
[A]: Non-insult


[Q]: Comment: Of course, rightist women (I am imitating your use of "leftist") wouldn't feel comfortable there even though they would still be welcomed as long as they respected the other people there. Greed, selfishness, and prejudices against people who are different have no place at the march. However, the article mentioned a young Green Party supporter getting a hostile reaction for her sign protesting the DNC. I don't approve of that. She should have been respected for her opinion.
[A]:
Non-insult