In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: insult and non-insult. Insult is any lanugage or act that is disrespectful or scornfully abusive.

Ex Input:
Comment: Why don't you just convict him before a trial happens whatever happen to innocent until PROVEN guilty as far as I'm concerned your a dumbass.

Ex Output:
Insult


Ex Input:
Comment: Good comments, Monica.
 
I imagine you'll agree that the discussion about who might be the first gay saint presupposes a fairly modern paradigm about sexual orientation. The norm throughout most of history has been for a somewhat flexible line. It's doubtful that Paul -- or most of the sacred authors, for that matter -- even thought in terms of  'straightness' or 'gayness,' but rather in terms of what they perceived as moral or immoral actions.

Regarding RC bishops, it seems that these days intellectual curiosity is not high on the list of qualifications. There are plenty of intellectually curious priests (well, some anyway), but they tend to get weeded out well before they rise to the level of the episcopacy, sad to say.

Ex Output:
Non-insult


Ex Input:
Comment: Hey Gordon. Hilcorp doesn't own Badami. The fact that you spout off about things without knowing what you're talking about helps explain why we have Democrats thinking that an income tax will save the State. Rape and pillage the earth? Hey, you do realize that natural gas is creating the electricity to power your computer....? Probably didn't know that either.

Ex Output:

Non-insult