We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gay Marriage) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gay marriage. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gay marriage.

Input: Consider Input: *SOAWatch, a movement to challenge American foreign policy and its support for tyrants in Latin America, by calling annual attention to the School of the Americas which trains fascist terrorists.

Output: Invalid


Input: Consider Input: But opposition to allowing another person the same civil rights you enjoy is, as I agree with Jaxian, MORALLY WRONG.

Output: Valid


Input: Consider Input: The law does not challenge the church organization��_��__��_��__s beliefs about homosexuality ��_��__��_��__��_��__ it merely requires that a pavilion that had been open to all for years comply with laws protecting everyone from discrimination, including gays and lesbians.


Output: Valid