In this task, you will be shown a sentence, and you should determine whether it is overruling or non-overruling. In law, an overruling sentence is a statement that nullifies a previous case decision as a precedent by a constitutionally valid statute or a decision by the same or higher ranking court which establishes a different rule on the point of law involved. Classify your answers into overruling or non-overruling
--------
Question: he argues his postconviction petition stated an arguable claim that he was denied effective assistance of appellate counsel because his counsel did not argue on direct appeal that the trial court erred when it denied his motion to dismiss juror cross for cause.

Answer: non-overruling


Question: although the district court recognized the "general rule" that " rooker-feldman may not be invoked against a federal-court plaintiff who was not actually a party to the prior state-court judgment," 379 f. supp. 2d, at 1123, it nevertheless followed tenth circuit precedent in allowing application of rooker-feldman against parties who were in privity with a party to the earlier state-court action.

Answer: overruling


Question: we have jurisdiction, article v, section 3(b)(3), florida constitution, and we approve in part and quash in part the decision of the fourth district.

Answer:
overruling