In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: insult and non-insult. Insult is any lanugage or act that is disrespectful or scornfully abusive.

[Q]: Comment: We should be making it harder to obtain citizenship, not easier. People don't value what you hand them on a platter. The Liberals are trying to make it easier and faster because studies show recent immigrants tend to vote for the party that was in power when they arrive here.  They don't really understand politics, but they understand that this party was the one that let them and their family in, so vote out of ignorance and gratitude. It is a despicable example, and not the first, of political parties putting their own advantage over the well-being of the country.
[A]: Non-insult


[Q]: Comment: Total madness here today. Most of the commenters here today should see a shrink, they are unable to think rationally, to distinguish facts from rumours, to control their fears, to read simple sentences., to engage in critical thinking. People should be honest and admit they do not like Muslims, nothing to do with freedom of speech.
[A]: Non-insult


[Q]: Comment: "The family’s attorney contends a recording with no visible images of sex acts cannot qualify as child pornography. Some legal experts disagree."....I'd like to know how the "legal experts" can determine if it's children in the audio...since you can't see anyone, how do you make that determination? Are they actually doing something or just doing an audio?
[A]:
Non-insult