TASK DEFINITION: In this task, you are given a passage which has a question and the context. You have to generate an answer to the question based on the information present in the context.
PROBLEM: Context: Although the C5 variant of cholinesterase is known to be a cause of hypercholinesterasemia, the pathophysiological significance of the C5 variant and the C5 variant-related hypercholinesterasemia in cardiovascular diseases remain unclear. The present study aimed to clarify the pathophysiological significance of the C5 variant as a risk or protective factor for coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients with severe hypercholinesterasemia.', 'Severe hypercholinesterasemia was defined as serum cholinesterase (ChE) activity >= 450 IU/L (>= 2.0 SD). We screened 11,648 consecutive outpatients between 2005 and 2011 at Toho University, Sakura Medical Center. In patients with severe hypercholinesterasemia, phenotyping of the C5 variant was conducted using polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and alpha-naphthyl butyrate staining.', '157 subjects (1.4% of 11,648 outpatients screened) were diagnosed with severe hypercholinesterasemia (mean serum ChE activity 574 ± 109 IU/L), and the frequency of the C5 variant was 45.2%. Subjects with the C5 variant had higher age, lower body mass index, milder dyslipidemia and liver dysfunction, and lower rates of hypertension and CAD compared with subjects without the C5 variant. Multivariate logistic regression model demonstrated that the presence of C5 variant independently lowered the risk of CAD, with odds ratio 0.071 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.007 - 0.763, p = 0.029).\Question: Is c5 variant associated with decreased risk of coronary artery disease in outpatients with severe hypercholinesterasemia?

SOLUTION: The prevalence of the C5 variant was relatively high, and the C5 variant is associated with decreased risk of CAD in outpatients with severe hypercholinesterasemia.

PROBLEM: Context: Patient-prosthesis mismatch has been identified as a risk factor for mortality after aortic valve replacement and for structural valve deterioration (SVD) in patients receiving a bioprosthetic aortic valve. The aim of the present study was to compare the incidence of aortic valve bioprosthesis replacement for SVD in patients with mismatch to a population without mismatch.', 'Three hundred eighty-seven adult patients who underwent aortic valve replacement with a bioprosthesis from 1974 to 2009 were retrospectively reviewed. Mismatch was considered to be present if the anticipated indexed effective orifice area was <0.70\u2009cm(2) /m(2) . The median follow-up period was 7.2 years. Follow-up was 97% complete.', "Patient-prosthesis mismatch was present in 12% of the study population (n\u2009=\u200947). Ten-year freedom from reoperation for aortic bioprosthesis replacement was 74.3\u2009±\u20093.2%. During follow-up, 111 patients underwent reoperation for aortic bioprosthesis replacement. Causes of aortic bioprosthesis replacement were SVD of the bioprosthesis (n\u2009=\u200996), paravalvular leak (n\u2009=\u200910), and acute endocarditis (n\u2009=\u20095). According to unadjusted Kaplan-Meier analysis, patients with mismatch had a higher incidence of aortic bioprosthesis replacement for SVD when compared with patients without mismatch (log rank test: p 0.05). This result was confirmed by multivariable Cox regression analysis, which identified two independent predictors of aortic bioprosthesis replacement for SVD: patients' age (hazard ratio (HR) 0.967) and patient-prosthesis mismatch (HR 2.161).\Question: Does patient-prosthesis mismatch in patients undergoing bioprosthetic aortic valve implantation increase risk of reoperation for structural valve deterioration?

SOLUTION: Patients suffering from mismatch were twice as likely to undergo reoperation for aortic bioprosthesis replacement for SVD than those without mismatch.

PROBLEM: Context: Migraine is associated with epilepsy, but the time order and nature of the relationship are unclear. We conducted a population based case control study to clarify the time order to determine whether migraine is a risk factor for epilepsy.', 'Migraine symptoms were evaluated in a population-based case-control study of all incident epilepsy in Icelandic children and in matched controls (next two same sex births in the country).', 'Migraine was associated with a fourfold increased risk for developing epilepsy, an association explained by migraine with aura (odds ratio, 8.1; 95% confidence interval, 2.7-24.3). Migraine without aura did not increase risk for epilepsy.\Question: Is migraine with aura a risk factor for unprovoked seizures in children?

SOLUTION:
Children with migraine with aura have a substantial increased risk to develop subsequent epilepsy. This finding is consistent with the hypothesis that migraine with aura and migraine without aura may be different disorders.