Given a document, generate a short title of the document. The title should convey the main idea/event/topic about which the document is being written. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

Input: Consider Input: As school leaders try to move on   Joe Paterno  loyalists  including many university trustees  continue to fight over the coachâs role in  his  assistantâs crimes.
In July  Penn Stateâs board of trustees met to discuss the most important issues facing a school system with 99 000 students and a $5.7 billion budget. It took about three hours before someone brought up Jerry Sandusky and  Joe Paterno .
Supporters of  Joe Paterno   right  question the evidence used to conclude  he  ignored or covered up the assaults committed by Jerry Sandusky  left. (1999 photo by Paul Vathis/Associated Press)
Law enforcement officials  victimsâ lawyers and private investigators â including Louis Freeh  the former FBI director who authored a damning 2012 report that asserted  Paterno âs involvement in a coverup â say the dispute results from stubborn âPaterno-deniers â âJoebotsâ and âtruthers â for whom no evidence will be strong enough to condemn the beloved former football coach.
âThe tragedy of all of this is that it is self-perpetuated and self-inflicted â said Tom Kline  an attorney for one victim. âThey have settled on an endless assault on anyone who dares suggest that there was something that happened that was wrong and that the fault lies at the doorstep of either  Paterno  or the football program.â
But alumni trustees and supporters insist  Paterno  and the school were victims of a rush to judgment that spared other  more culpable organizations â most notably the Second Mile  Sanduskyâs charity for at-risk children â from public scorn. They point to conflicting accounts of the assault at the core of the coverup case  evidence the NCAA may have influenced Freehâs report and doubts about claims  Paterno  ignored assaults as far back as the 1970s.
According to Freeh  in 2001   Paterno  and three university administrators â president Graham Spanier  athletic director Tim Curley and senior vice president Gary Schultz â decided to conceal a report of Sandusky assaulting a boy  to avoid bad publicity for the university and its football team. The men displayed a âcallous and shocking disregard for child victims â Freeh said  as they âempowered Sanduskyâ to abuse boys for another decade.
Freehâs verdict capped an unimaginable downfall for  Paterno   who just eight months before seemed poised to retire as the winningest  most respected coach in the history of college football. In 46 years as head coach  heâd piled up 409 wins and two national championships while professing selflessness and education  fielding teams that wore simple jerseys with no names on the back  his players graduating at rates that outpaced competitors. In the venal world of college football   Paterno  built a reputation as a coach who valued integrity over winning â âSuccess with Honorâ was his motto â and now he stood accused of covering up for a pedophile to protect his public image.
In including  Paterno   Freeh had gone further than prosecutors  who would charge the administrators with crimes but said they did not believe  Paterno  participated. In defending his conclusion  Freeh cited âthe most important evidence in the caseâ: a chain of emails between the three administrators from 2001.
A newspaper with the headline rewritten was left near a statue of  Paterno  outside Beaver Stadium on Jan. 23  2012  the day after he died. (Alex Brandon/Associated Press) Freeh conceded his reportâs condemnation of  Paterno  was made without knowledge of what was said in  Paterno âs meeting with Curley. (Matt Rourke/Associated Press)
The emails showed the men planned to report Sandusky to child welfare authorities but changed course after Curley met with  Paterno . Instead  they banned Sandusky from bringing children to Penn State and informed the Second Mile of the incident. Sandusky was convicted of assaulting four boys after this incident.
In an email  one trustee urged then-Penn State president Rod Erickson to tear down the statue of  Paterno  outside the stadium  if it would pacify the NCAA.
Eleven days after Freehâs news conference  the NCAA announced that Penn State had entered into a âconsent decree â accepting a $60 million fine and the erasing of all of Paternoâs wins after 1998  the year Sandusky was investigated â but cleared â by Penn State police and a state child welfare agency. Freeh had concluded  Paterno  should have suspected then his assistant was a pedophile.
Penn State students protested the schoolâs handling of the Sandusky scandal. (2011 photo by Gene J. Puskar/Associated Press) Students also honored the memory of  Paterno  after  his  death at age 85. (2012 photo by Gary Cameron/Reuters)
The lawsuit also produced communications between NCAA staffers and Freehâs team that prompted some alumni to theorize Freeh catered his report â which  by including  Paterno   put the case squarely in the NCAAâs crosshairs â to appeal to a desired client.
The NCAA is only a part of why some alumni feel the school and  Paterno  took a disproportionate share of the blame  Schmidt said  before explaining theories involving a former governor and the Second Mile.

Output: Penn State six years after Jerry Sandusky scandal remains divided


Input: Consider Input: The hiatus on production of House of Cards' sixth and final season has been extended another two weeks as the series continues to determine how to proceed without Kevin Spacey. Earlier this month  Netflix completely severed ties with the actor following claims of sexual misconduct.
Related Kevin Spacey Scandal: Everything We Know So Far Two-time Oscar winner has been dropped by agency and publicist in wake of growing list of allegations
In early November  after at least eight House of Cards employees accused Spacey of predatory behavior in a CNN report  the in-production season went into hiatus after Netflix stated the streaming service "not be involved with any further production of House of Cards that includes  Kevin Spacey ."
Two episodes of the final season were filmed prior to  Spacey 's firing. Producers initially announced that the writers would take a few weeks to rework the final season to excise Spacey's Frank Underwood character from the story. However  three weeks later  House of Cards' production company announced that the series would remain in hiatus for another two weeks.
House of Cards isn't the only project to make last-minute changes in the aftermath of  Spacey 's sexual misconduct accusations: Ridley Scott's All the Money in the World  due out in December  reshot all the scenes featuring Spacey as J. Paul Getty  with actor Christopher Plummer replacing the actor in the Oscar contender.

Output: 'House of Cards' Hiatus Extended Following Kevin Spacey Exit


Input: Consider Input: Trotter had been missing since December 8  1998  when she disappeared from the Montgomery County community college where she was a first-year student. Three days later  on unrelated warrants  the police arrested  Larry Swearingen  a 27-year-old unemployed electrician with a young family and a history of run-ins with the law . Police suspected  Swearingen  was Trotterâs killer. He had been seen talking with Trotter two days before her disappearance outside a local store near Lake Conroe  which abuts the national forest. On the day she went missing  he was seen chatting with her in the college library.
After the body was found some three weeks later   Swearingen  was charged with Trotterâs kidnapping  sexual assault  and murder. There was little in the way of hard evidence to back up the charges. In addition to the two times he was seen talking to Trotter prior to her disappearance  the state pointed to a lie he told  claiming he didnât know who Trotter was  and to a letter he wrote while jailed in which he pretended to be someone else and claimed knowledge about the murder that officials said only the killer would know.
In 2000   Swearingen  was tried for the crime and sentenced to death.
Nearly 20 years after the murder   he  maintains  his  innocence  and for more than a decade  he  has been fighting to clear  his  name  in part by repeatedly requesting that key crime scene evidence be subjected to DNA testing. While the stateâs case against  him  was built on circumstantial evidence  there was also a trove of physical evidence that prosecutors seemingly either ignored or dismissed.
The state insisted that the length of hose matched a second piece of hosiery retrieved from the trailer home  Swearingen  shared with  his  wife  Terry. But the hose from the trailer wasnât found until weeks after Trotterâs body was discovered  after police had conducted two exhaustive searches of the Swearingen property. And instead of submitting either piece for DNA testing  the state had a forensic analyst line them up side by side to determine visually whether they came from the same pair of hosiery â the kind of subjective forensic pattern analysis that raises serious concerns about scientific validity and reliability. At  Swearingen âs trial  the analyst testified that the two lengths of hose matched âto the exclusion of all other pantyhose.â
According to court filings  evidence that was tested pointed away from  Swearingen . DNA collected from a cigarette butt found in  Swearingen âs trailer that prosecutors claimed belonged to Trotter excluded her as the donor. And DNA developed from blood found in fingernail scrapings taken from Trotterâs body at autopsy excluded  Swearingen   revealing instead the profile of an unknown male.
To date  Texasâs highest criminal court  the Court of Criminal Appeals  has sided with the state  concluding that the âmountainâ of circumstantial evidence against  Swearingen  outweighs the potentially probative value of DNA evidence. The court has denied his request for testing four times â highlighting a confounding  if not obstructionist  approach to requests made for post-conviction DNA testing under state law.
In  Swearingen âs case and others  the court has construed the right to testing in a way that severely narrows eligibility â an approach that  Swearingen âs lawyers say threatens to make the once powerful law a dead letter  potentially closing access to testing in all cases where there is a claim of wrongful conviction.
 Swearingen  is scheduled for execution on November 16.
Death row inmate  Larry Swearingen  during an interview at the Polunsky Unit in Longview  Texas. Photo: Jacob Villanueva/The Texas Tribune
When  Swearingen  first sought DNA testing in 2004  the denial was straightforward â the CCA refused to consider the request because  Swearingen âs lawyers had missed a filing deadline.
In its 2010 ruling  the court noted that the statute only allowed testing of evidence âcontaining biological materialâ and concluded that  Swearingen  could not demonstrate that the items  he  wanted to test â the pantyhose  additional fingernail scrapings  and clothing â were actually âprovenâ to contain such material.
âThis court has held that a mere assertion or a general claim that existence of biological material is probable will fail to satisfy the appellantâs burdenâ under the statute  the court wrote. It also faulted  Swearingen  for suggesting that any unknown profile developed from DNA testing should be run against state and federal databases  a provision that didnât appear in the statute.
 Swearingen  filed for testing again in 2013. Newly elected District Judge Kelly Case approved his request  which was accompanied by an affidavit from a DNA analyst who said the evidence would likely contain biological materials.
For example  while the definition of biological material fit for testing included skin cells   Swearingen  still couldnât confirm that skin cells existed on the pantyhose used to strangle Trotter or on the clothes  she  was wearing. And having a DNA analyst say such materials would likely be there was not enough. âWe have explicitly held that appellee must prove biological material exists and not that it is merely probable â the court wrote.
But in order to definitively prove that microscopic evidence exists  you have to test for it  notes Bryce Benjet  a staff attorney with the Innocence Project and one of  the lawyers handling Swearingenâs case . It was a frustrating conclusion  if not an impossible standard to meet.


Output: Texas Schedules Execution but Refuses DNA Tests That Could Prove a Manâs Innocence