Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.

Example Input: Intetesting read, now the hundred year history from the miners  when the penninsula was treeless, the skilac glacier was visible from Kenai noted in miners logs and the US Forest Service survey of 1917 indicate constant change as the norm.
Example Output: No

Example Input: Isn't it ironic how butt-hurt some white men get when there is a story honoring the contributions of a group that they are not a part of.  I wonder if they ever stop and think, "Maybe this this how African Americans feel all the time".  It should also be noted that these are the same folks who rally against political correctness and hypersensitivity. On average, I would say white men are the most hypersensitive, easily-offended demographic in America.
Example Output: Yes

Example Input: Good for Larson, he was assaulted on his private property. 

He possibly saved other lives by attempting a citizen's arrest, he was assaulted then protected life & property, ultimately stopping the pursuit. This criminal could've killed children, passing a stopped, offloading, school bus at an estimated 60 mph.

Why is this even a topic for discussion? Vern needs to make sure this never sees a courtroom.

Thank you Mr. Larson for doing your part.
Example Output:
Yes