In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.
--------
Question: Comment: Let's let the Mayor answer your questions - "How many passengers are needed to ride the rail to break even?"  Considering we haven't figured out fare prices yet they could range from a penny to $100/ride depending if you bring your surfboard or oversized luggage on board......."I DUNNO".


 "How long will it take to reach that number of passengers... 5 years, 10 years, never? "  I told you....."I DUNNO".  

" What is projected maintenance cost, what is projected longevity of equipment?"  Why are you asking me these silly questions....."I DUNNO!"


" What is projected labor cost increase?"  That's it!  Have you been drinking you belligerent small man?  I'm not taking any more of this.................

Answer: Non-obscene


Question: Comment: Okay, so when they come for the Socialists here I'll tell them to, Fuck off

Answer: Obscene


Question: Comment: Thanks for this editorial. Well said. Hate groups are bad, and opposing them isn't bad. And the leaders of the U.S.A. have a moral obligation to represent all the people and call the white supremacists, neo-nazis, and KKK for what they are – hate groups. Until recently, these hate groups were small minorities relegated to the fringes, and nobody paid attention. They were, as Old Soul suggests, like cockroaches scurrying to hide from the light. That people now defend them is a sign of selfishness and bigotry eroding the values that made this country what it is. Good citizens oppose racial hatred and protest hate groups. We should be able to expect that of our leaders too.

Answer:
Non-obscene