In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.
--------
Question: Comment: Justin is a devout Catholic, it's no wonder he believes the earth is flat and only 6000 years old.

If he's into cupping, perhaps he's into other forms of fakery.  Has he burned any witches at the stake recently?

Answer: Non-sexual-explicit


Question: Comment: NATO can only postulate when it comes to non-existent "threat" from Russia. They don't want to do anything to fight the real threat of terrorism. Hey, France, how about cleaning up the mess you made in Libya?

Answer: Non-sexual-explicit


Question: Comment: The correct interpretation is, in the 2015 Canadian election, 68.1 % of Canadians voted for left of center candidates, with Trudeau winning a plurality of 39.5%.
In the US election Clinton won the popular vote 48.1% to 46.2% with Trump winning the election because of the vagaries of the electoral college.
Four years earlier Trump tweeted outrage because the numbers on his TV screen, showed that Romney was nearly a million votes ahead of Obama in the popular vote count, but Obama was projected to win the electoral count.
Eventually, Obama pulled ahead in the popular vote, and he would go on to win a majority.
Trump’s tweet from four years ago reveals that he thinks one word describes a presidential candidate who gets fewer votes than his rival: loser.

Answer:
Non-sexual-explicit