TASK DEFINITION: Categorize the comment on the basis of severe toxicity. If the comment is severely toxic output Yes, otherwise output No.
PROBLEM: Wait, fer reals? That went to court?! And he WON?!? For the sake of every fuck. We finally made it criminal to tell the truth, and it started here. How sickening. I mean, I kinda get it, being socially shunned sucks, but not being able to inform your community about dangerous individuals sucks even worse. It would be one thing if the allegations were false, but if they're true ... well ... if you don't like the consequences maybe you shouldn't have done the deeds? I mean, I made the front page of my city's newspaper for being "different," on the heals of Columbine and on Mother's Day no less, and that was awkward as hell. It never even crossed my mind to accuse the newspaper of any misconduct. I was weird, apparently that was news, and they shared it. Well, fuck me then. 
How is Canada these days?

SOLUTION: Yes

PROBLEM: This nice map clearly suggests an alternative and equally defensible headline: Voters West of I5 Are Warier of School Bonds Than Eastsiders.

The PPS Board needs to understand, as well as those blue PPS neighborhoods, that placing another bond on the Nov. 2016 ballot will put those who support it in DIRECT OPPOSITION to Portland's city commissioners who have declared a "housing crisis."

Increasing property taxes, as a bond would do, is anathema to increasing housing affordability. City commissioners and candidates for city council must vigorously oppose any PPS bond issue or be required to appear in public with very large signs around their necks saying, "hypocrite."

SOLUTION: No

PROBLEM: Give it up, Black.  You don't belong on this site.  I'm sure there's a KKK site waiting for your input.

SOLUTION:
Yes