instruction:
Given a document, find the main entity about whom the author is writing. Write the full name if mentioned in the text. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].
question:
Amber Harding  a staff attorney at the Washington Legal Clinic for the Homeless   said  her  organization is arguing for multiple changes to the legislation  including requirements for proof of residency and the creation of a presumption  absent proof to the contrary  that anyone named as an occupant on a lease is ineligible for shelter.
 She  said both provisions would be especially burdensome for the young parents â commonly between the ages of 18 and 24 â who often seek shelter  since they may not have adequate documentation of where they live or may still be listed on leases at the homes of parents unwilling to host their families.
âThe purpose of the right to shelter is to prevent people from freezing to death â  Harding  said. With the current bill   she  added  âWe will guarantee that people will be left out on freezing nights who are D.C. residents and are eligible for shelter  just because theyâve put up these bureaucratic hurdles.â
Nadeau said the bill has evolved in a way that softens some of the original shelter eligibility rules proposed by the mayor. It now includes a provision that shelter applicants would meet the residence requirement if they are already receiving certain other D.C. government benefits for the poor   she  said. The bill has also been modified to require only one proof of residency  rather than the original two   she  said.
âWhen we say that we canât keep spending $80 000 a night . . . itâs not because we donât want to support the people in hotels â  she  said. âItâs because we want a better intervention for them. We can spend $80 000 a night in so many ways that help people more.â
answer:
Amber Harding


question:
In a recent New York Times article  Dr. Willie Parker says he believes “that as an abortion provider  [he is] doing God’s work.” It’s his Christian faith  the author contends  that drives him to abort babies. His “Life’s Work” (as his new book is ironically titled) is to end life for every preborn child that comes before him.
The Jewish people  some of whom later became the first Christians  were to avoid partaking in the practices of the surrounding peoples  who sacrificed their children to appease their gods. Christians have long held that to abort one’s child as an act of worship to the gods of convenience is not permitted by the God of the Bible. But abortion advocates will attempt to play the “he’s a Christian” card by spinning opposition from Christians to imply  Parker  is persecuted within  his  own faith tradition.
The second thing abortion elites love about  Parker  is  his  skin color. Any opposition he faces from white pro-lifers not associated with Christianity can be easily dismissed as bigotry. Sweep under the rug for a minute that even black celebrities are accusing abortion providers in black communities of genocide. While Planned Parenthood’s media arm proclaims support of black lives  its other arm is reaching for a pair of forceps to end life for hundreds of black babies each day.
In the tradition of the black slave owners in the Confederate South  Parker makes his money by breaking the backs (or spines and what-have-you) of others  many of whom share his skin color. He can’t admit that his work (some have called it his “ministry”) hurts his own people or it’d affect his bottom line. Abortion advocates want us all to simply accept that black lives only matter once they’ve had the privilege of being born. This brings us to the final contradiction of  Parker ’s platform.
 Parker  considers  himself  a feminist.  He  believes  he  is bettering the future for females. Don’t think too long about the number of female lives  he ’s ended before they’ve begun. This is nothing new to the insane logic of abortion advocacy. If they can successfully shift our attention off the rights of the life inside the womb to the perceived “rights” the pregnant woman has over her inhabited womb  they’ve succeeded.
 Parker ’s public persona is a farce.  He  parades the myth that  he  has a moral responsibility to “help women” while  he  strips them of their own responsibility to the children they’ve conceived. Christianity places value upon the lives of black women  so much so that it envisions a world in which their lives aren’t ended in the womb. But maybe we’re the ones who are deceiving pregnant women? Perhaps we’re the ones getting rich by volunteering with crisis pregnancy centers and giving away free pregnancy tests  ultrasounds  and diapers.
answer:
Willie Parker


question:
Northwest Side Ald.  John Arena  filed a complaint with the Civilian Office of Police Accountability alleging Chicago police officers may have violated the department’s code of conduct by making racially charged online comments about a controversial Jefferson Park apartment development plan that includes affordable housing.
 Arena  made the complaint in mid-January  amid a long-running fight over the project in which supporters have claimed opponents are trying to keep minorities from moving into the bungalow belt neighborhood.
The 45th Ward alderman said his office had presented the City Hall inspector general’s office with numerous examples of people identifying themselves as police officers in their online profiles or appearing in profile photos in police uniforms while using “racially charged language” to oppose the building on social media. The inspector general’s office told  Arena  to take the complaints to COPA because it potentially involved police officers.
 Arena  said he didn’t do any kind of investigation of whether the 31 are  in fact  police officers  saying “that will be up to COPA.”  Arena ’s office declined to provide examples of the comments it forwarded to COPA  citing the ongoing investigation.
On Friday  the Chicago Fraternal Order of Police posted a letter on its website from attorney Timothy Grace to  Arena   saying if the alderman doesn’t withdraw the complaint  the union would sue him on behalf of any police officers who turn up among the comments he submitted.
The letter says officers spoke out in opposition to the project while off duty and that there are congestion issues and other “race neutral” concerns. The letter states that  Arena ’s “decision to threaten their job security and their reputations for expressing their opinions appears retaliatory and motivated as a means to stifle their opposition.”
 Arena  declined to comment on the police union letter. After he filed the complaint   Arena  said that he wanted the police oversight agency to determine whether the comments breached department rules.
answer:

John Arena