In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence can be inferred from the statement. Incorrect choices change the meaning in important ways or have details that are not mentioned in the statement. Indicate your answer as 1,2, or 3 corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.
--------
Question: Statement: He was pro-German, as he would have been pro-Boer. Choices:  1. He speaks fluent German. 2. German beliefs were ones he believed in. 3. The man is a loyal American.

Answer: 2


Question: Statement: I am generally a fan of Michael Kinsley's, but I must take issue with his recent article, Social  From Ponzi Scheme to Shell Game. Choices:  1. Michael Kinsley's latest article raises some issues within me. 2. I loved everything about Michael Kinsley's newest article. 3. Despite causing some issues my opinion of MIchael Kinsley hasn't changed.

Answer: 1


Question: Statement: I can confirm he does, for I have tried to convey the same Ionian Enchantment in my recent book How the Mind Works. Choices:  1. I can't confirm that he does, there is no mention of it within my book. 2. I worked day and night to convey the same Ionian Enchantment in my recent book "How the Mind Works."  3. It's true that he does, I tried to show the same Ionian Enchantment in my recent novel "How the Mind Works." 

Answer:
3