Given a document, generate a short title of the document. The title should convey the main idea/event/topic about which the document is being written. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

Example Input: When the three-pointers are falling and the good vibes are flowing   Otto Porter Jr.  celebrates  his  shots with a signature pose. As  he  jogs back on defense   Porter  leans forward  holding three fingers so close to the court  he  could pick up loose change.
On Friday night  the threes kept falling  the vibes were right  and  Porter  often did  his  thing in the Washington Wizardsâ 121-103 win over the Houston Rockets.
 Porter  made the deep perimeter  his  home against the NBAâs leading three-point shooting team. In the first quarter  Porterâs three makes from beyond the arc matched the team total for the Rockets.  He  added three more in the fourth  getting an early rest as Washington turned a showdown with one of the top teams in the Western Conference into a blowout.
 Porterâs  seven three-pointers tied a career high and  he  finished with a game-high 26 points (on 9-for-16 shooting) to go with a team-high seven assists. Bradley Beal and Kelly Oubre Jr. added 21 points each  and John Wall finished with 17 and four assists but defined his game on the defensive end with five steals.
Example Output: Jekyll meet Hyde: Wizards bounce back from Hawks loss by thumping Rockets

Example Input: Consider the case of Edgar Martinez  who baseball writers for years treated as a marginal candidate for induction. The fact he was a DH most of his career worked against him  as did his relative lack of home runs and playing most of his career in relative obscurity in Seattle.
But  Martinez  surged in voting the last two years  propelled by supporters that used WAR and OPS to make  his  case.  He  received 70.4 percent of the latest vote  falling just 20 votes shy of joining Jones  Thome  Vladimir Guerrero and Trevor Hoffman in this year's class.
"We are trending up "  Martinez  tweeted. "Next year may be the year."
But is the fact that  Martinez  is tied for 32nd in history for OPS enough to get  him  in the Hall of Fame? Or is it more important to have the kind of impact DiMaggio had on a Yankees team that won a staggering nine World Series titles in his 13 years in pinstripes?
 Martinez  may indeed make it on  his  10th and final year of eligibility. Next year's newcomers won't crowd ballots too much  with Mariano Rivera looking to be the only first-ballot pick. There's a good chance both  Martinez  and Mussina pick up votes.
Example Output: Column: Baseball is all about numbers so is Hall of Fame

Example Input: Hillary Clinton . (Brendan Smialowski/AFP via Getty Images)
Thereâs not much to do when youâre home for the holidays  so this season some have decided to fill up their free time by melting down over  a video that snipes at Hillary Clinton .
âTake up a hobby in the new year â a young writer holding a glass of champagne says to  Clinton  in the short  which Vanity Fair magazineâs âHiveâ vertical produced as part of a series proposing âresolutionsâ to various political figures. âVolunteer work  knitting  improv comedy â literally anything that will keep you from running again.â
Well  no.  The video  had sexist overtones  and the lameness of the jokes made them all the more offensive.  It âs harder to plead comedic license when your comedy isnât funny. But  Clinton  occupies an odd place in the political sphere:  She  was so close to the Oval Office for so long leading up to 2016 that  her  heir apparentness discouraged potential challengers. A career candidate from a Democratic dynasty held little appeal for anyone dissatisfied with the party status quo then  and will hold even less in 2020. Itâs not surprising that some cringe to think  Clinton âs shadow could still loom over races to come.
So then why resurrect  her ?
Although ride-or-die  Clinton  supporters werenât they only ones who took umbrage at the knitting comment  it was that cohort who turned particularly hysterical. These all-in  Clinton  fans seem determined to keep their candidate relevant: Even if they arenât calling on  her  to run again  they want  her  at the center of the political conversation. Every faux pas of President Trumpâs becomes an opportunity for Clinton-would-have-been-bettering. No kidding  she  would  yet thatâs neither here nor there when it comes to countering the damage Trump does every day  or to cultivating a roster of candidates who will win the seats to turn things around.
[Vanity Fair staffers provide snotty  condescending life tips for  Hillary Clinton ]
But more perplexing than the multitude of Clinton crusaders who are still crusading are the  Clinton  critics who continue to place the defeated candidate center-stage in their narratives even as they shriek that they want  her  out. This  besides its blatant unfunniness  may be the greatest failing of Vanity Fairâs ill-advised advice video. The staffers have devoted one minute and three seconds to telling  Clinton  to go away  and all theyâve succeeding in doing is bringing  her  right back.
This is âWhat Happened?â week on repeat. Journalists lambasted  Clinton  for re-litigating the 2016 primary in writing  and then they did the exact same thing. Over and over. They rolled their eyes at  her  play for attention  cash  catharsis or whatever else it was â and then they helped  her  find all of the above.
And itâs not only professional pundits who canât seem to give  Clinton  up. For every amateur commentator or plain old civilian re-upping a  Clinton  campaign talking point on Twitter  thereâs someone ready to fire back with an explanation of why  Clinton  is the worst politician of all time. This goes on  every day  more than a year after the election and almost a year after the man who beat  Clinton  walked into the White House.
Hours before the Vanity Fair outrage  Trump sent a Boxing Day Twitter missive from Mar-a-Lago in his usual style: âThey used this Crooked Hillary pile of garbage as the basis for going after the Trump Campaign!â he concluded  harping on his beef with  Clinton  yet again. Which prompted all his critics  left  very left and right alike  to tell him to get over it. Perhaps they should  too.
Example Output:
The Vanity Fair Hillary Clinton video isn't worth the fuss