In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.

[Q]: Comment: It is rare that a Canadian politician is so tone-deaf to the habits of the surrounding population.

Trump's message must come to Canada?

Hello?

Trump says he wants to obstruct access to abortion by overturning Roe versus Wade, he says he wants to make sure that restrictions are avoided that would inhibit the owning of handguns and assault rifles by city dwellers, and he says he wants to ensure people do not get access to single payer health care.

Um, sure, go ahead and run on that message in a Canadian election. Hope you enjoy being in the wilderness...
[A]: Agree


[Q]: Comment: A cash for access event.  A donation to Pierre Elliott Trudeau Foundation.  He must be getting advise from the Clintons and Premier Wynne.  This is corruption at every possible level.  Justin has just become the new Duffy.
[A]: Agree


[Q]: Comment: Intelligent perhaps; impeccable credentials no.

He is just another apologist for the conventional energy sector.
[A]:
Disagree