In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

[EX Q]: Comment: Of course the progressives here are 'praying' for Cardinal Pell to be convicted. Why?  Not because he might be guilty or innocent, that is immaterial. It because he is an orthodox Catholic bishop.  Orthodox Catholics in the Curia have been regularly cursed by Pope Francis who has gradually placed his heterodox cronies into high places in the Curia.
"I am the Pope."
[EX A]: Non-sexual-explicit

[EX Q]: Comment: There seems to be plenty of corruption in Washington DC, and established political sycophants routinely come out on the wrong side... Yet our media seems fixated on chasing accusations or facilitating myths. 

Drain the swamp!!!
[EX A]: Non-sexual-explicit

[EX Q]: Comment: Yes, because conservatives in 2012 wanted a candidate who had launched the prototype of Obamacare in Massachusetts. Of course, we're all stupid and will just vote for anyone!

If the Republicans want my vote, they need to run a REAL conservative -- which is not Mittens Romney or the Donald or John McCain. That leaves a lot of candidates, none of whom will be the nominee.

I'm voting 3rd party this year because neither of the two major parties could find a good candidate if their existence depended on it ... which is exactly the point of voting 3rd party. It's time for a change, folks. Join me in the rebellion!
[EX A]:
Non-sexual-explicit