In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

[EX Q]: Comment: RadirD, Kim Jung Un and the DPRK regime threaten us all the time.  Why would Trump or any other rational person use that as a line in the sand?  It took them a few hours after his asinine statement to threaten us yet again.  Foolish.

The only person who yells out "I'm going to punch you in the face!" is a coward who doesn't actually want a fistfight (like Kim Jong Un).  A serious person would just slam you in the kisser without warning.

Don't get me wrong, the DPRK is a growing and serious threat and there may not be a way out of a conflict at this point.  They have been seriously mishandled and underestimated by every president (both GOP and Dems) since the Korean war.
[EX A]: Non-sexual-explicit

[EX Q]: Comment: I'm honestly unrepentant on this: Sex, attempted sex, sexual assault against your child and you die. No mercy, nothing less. Death. Male or Female abusers put to death. That is it.

We seriously need the death penalty back. Without it, we've become idiots.
[EX A]: Sexual-explicit

[EX Q]: Comment: And I suppose you are in agreement with Canada aborting (murdering) over 80,000 babies each year and that forcing every Canadian taxpayer to be complicit in the murder (we are forced to pay for our socialistic health care system) is a neat way to hypocritically call ourselves a socially conscious people. We, and that includes you, are a bloody sick society. The US on the other hand does not wish to condone the murder of unborn children.
[EX A]:
Non-sexual-explicit