instruction:
In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.
question:
Comment: If the Democrats had any brains they would never "block" a Supreme Court nominee just based on ideology.  If they are not qualified that is one thing but if they are not a left winger that is nonsense.  Maybe the Republicans should then block any leftie from the court who is otherwise qualified.  This kind of stuff is what ruins our entire system and makes people not trust it at all.  We want good judges who are not buried in ideology but can rule on the facts and the law.  How hard is that?  Often, it is much easier than checking a potential ruling against a certain ideology.  Try it!
answer:
Non-sexual-explicit


question:
Comment: The states that primarily voted Republican are well known for being welfare states. With 23+ millions about to be out of insurance because they do not realize that their insurance they paid for is an expansion on medicaid... Your insurance is about to go up to cover those that will not be able to afford to go to the doctor and end up in the emergency room. Good job on voting to increase the insurance I pay for each month. Thanks for being ignorant.
answer:
Non-sexual-explicit


question:
Comment: T.D. good for you and your comment!!!  Half the country would have expressed themselves in the same manner (a finger gesture) given the chance.  BOYCOTT NANA. NANA affiliates and contractors!!  We live in a nation of free speech not a dictatorship!  It is too bad that this ANCSA corporation has to kiss T's butt.
answer:

Sexual-explicit