In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine the neutral choice based on your inference from the statement and your commonsense knowledge. The neutral choice is a sentence that neither agrees nor disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3', corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence. If sentence X agrees with sentence Y, one's correctness follows from the other one. If sentence X disagrees with sentence Y, they can not be correct at the same time.

Statement: Slate writer Mickey Kaus calls them). Choices: 1. Slate writer Mickey Kaus does not acknowledge their presence. 2. Slate writer Mickey Kaus invites them for an interview. 3. Slate writer Mickey Kaus summons them.
2

Statement: For purposes of this simulation, the amount of allowances banked from 2002 through 2006 was calculated as the simple difference between the reference case projections and the actual emission trajectory of each scenario. Choices: 1. The simulation incorrectly calculated allowances backed. 2. The simulation did not calculate anything. 3. The simulation calculated allowances backed.
1

Statement: That strengthens the conviction that the person in question was her husband.  Choices: 1. Her husband wasn't there, so it couldn't have been him. 2. All of the evidence points to it being her husband. 3. It makes sense that it was her husband.

2