In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence can be inferred from the statement. Incorrect choices change the meaning in important ways or have details that are not mentioned in the statement. Indicate your answer as 1,2, or 3 corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.

[Q]: Statement: Nor is Clinton's blend of realism and idealism necessarily corrupt. Choices:  1. Clinton's blend of realism and idealism is extremely corrupt. 2. The blend of realism and idealism portrayed by Clinton should be punished. 3. Clinton's blend of realism and idealism is fair.
[A]: 3


[Q]: Statement: The Environmental Council of the States approved a resolution in February, 2001, supporting a cost-effective, efficient and environmentally protective multi-pollutant proposal. Choices:  1. The Environment Council of the States does not make resolutions. 2. The Environment Council of the States approved a multi faceted resolution in Feb. 2001. 3. The Environment Council of the States hopes it's resolution will make a difference.
[A]: 2


[Q]: Statement: But this is a trade-off well worth making. Choices:  1. You will gain the most from the trade-off. 2. This is a terrible trade-off; don't make it. 3. It is a good trade off to make.
[A]:
3