In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: threat and non-threat. Threat is a statement that someone will be hurt or harmed, especially if the person does not do something in particular.

[EX Q]: Comment: Do the crime, pay for it.  Zero sympathy.
[EX A]: Threat

[EX Q]: Comment: O: "At the time of the Iraq invasion, Trump was not a politician and much more likely to let his true inside be known."

Well his 'true inside' at the time was support for the invasion. Tepid support, but support nonetheless.

O: "I believe him when he says he did not support the war since demonstration thereof requires action. . "

By definition, answering a question on a nationally-syndicated radio show constitutes taking an "action." 

The funny thing is that this is such a stupid issue. When asked, Trump could have said, "At the time, I was sort of for it but I wasn't really sure." Presto! No issue. Everyone would have understood because that was the mood of the country at the time. But for some reason he just isn't wired that way.
[EX A]: Non-threat

[EX Q]: Comment: I read the article over again and I finally could pin down what bothered me.

 The author somehow implied that women's lack of security is somehow different from men's lack of security, and that particularly minority women are being singled out. However, I don't see how for a family (and most of us eventually form one) men's lack of security is different form women's lack of security: either way, lost job blows a hole in the budget, and, in my case, it will be a far bigger hole if I am fired - simply because I make more.

 This way, the whole complaint reads like "minority women don't have men who are as effective at home as non-minority men" - but this is a harmful way to go after equality; asking men to pick up slack after deadbeat hubbies who nevertheless procreated is a program that is guaranteed to brew a lot of resentment due to simple biology and psychology of infidelity.
[EX A]:
Non-threat