We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Ex Input:
Sent1: So what does he have to do with a debate like this about murderers and the death penalty?
 Sent2: If the same murderer had been given the death penalty, and never released in the first place, he would not be able to kill again.

Ex Output:
Not similar


Ex Input:
Sent1: The comparison is no bridge to the death penalty, however, because there is nothing gained by seeing a person fried to death as opposed to seeing them fade away in a prison cell for the rest of their life.
 Sent2: For some people death penalty is better than life in prison, who are respect their freedom and who are consider that it is better to die than someone to judge them.

Ex Output:
Not similar


Ex Input:
Sent1: The death penalty is the best possible deterrent for crime.
 Sent2: The thing is, without the death penalty there is absolutely no deterrent from committing heinous crimes.

Ex Output:

Similar