In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Input: Consider Input: Comment: Well shucks. I guess you'll just have to cut costs.

Output: Non-sexual-explicit


Input: Consider Input: Comment: that you are so pompously arrogant to speak on behalf of all the public, you might consider counseling to address your inflated ego problem.

Output: Non-sexual-explicit


Input: Consider Input: Comment: There was a term floating around some time ago: I think it was "cosmetic abortions"? The rich and famous who could see pregnancy as simply "utilitarian" and without a qualm - or maybe  a twitch at being discovered by their husband or "sugar daddy" - would buy the "riddance".  
A rich psychopathic narcissist who self-proclaims his absolute license and opportunity to grope women's genitals likely has; has done so for more; and likely has "cosmetically" paid for the "riddance".  (Reminds me of Tom Wolfe's "Vanity of the Gods"). Even if he hasn't, he seems like someone who would. Not someone I would want to be around. St Paul was only a tax-collector and "persecutor" when his lightning hit. A conversion for Trump would require a strike more akin to that which "enlivened" Frankenstein's beast.


Output: Sexual-explicit