instruction:
The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.
question:
Context: 'Hello! I am very excited!🙂 How about you?' 'Yes!  Would you mind sharing your highest priority item with me?  My most valued item right now is Food actually' 'I am willing to share everything.'
Utterance: 'Awesome.  I would prefer getting 3 of my highest priority item though, and maybe you could get 3 of your highest priority item?'
answer:
No


question:
Context: 'Hello, how are you doing?' 'I’m doing fine. How about you?'
Utterance: 'I'm doing well. I was hoping I could have the extra firewood because my group decided to camp for a few extra days and want to make sure we have enough'
answer:
Yes


question:
Context: 'I would really like to have 3 waters and 3 firewood because this is my first time camping and I don't have survival skills. ' 'You must be a comedian.  We will need to come to a compromise because there's no way that's going to happen.  I am like a water buffalo so I'll need at least two waters.  In addition, my family is from the South and will need firewood as well.' 'I can't swim too. I think two waters will help me to survive on this trip and I will need at least two firewood to make fish or other food items for my family. '
Utterance: 'You don't need this water to swim.  You can take two of the food if you're worried about food.  I will take two water and two firewood since I have a large family to nourish and keep warm.  Your initial suggestion of 3  waters and firewood is laughable.  Please provide a realistic compromise.'
answer:

Yes