We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Ex Input:
Sent1: And that killer has help, he has the people that support the death penalty and will give him more appeals, and if found guilty he'll get an easy way out with death, he won't have to suffer.
 Sent2: If we have a death penalty statute on the books, a person is convicted under that statute, his ONE appeal fails...he should die.

Ex Output:
Not similar


Ex Input:
Sent1: but yes only in extreme cases, and only if we can prove the person is guilty without a doubt.
 Sent2: I think the death penalty should only be used in extreme cases where the accused is, without a doubt, guilty.

Ex Output:
Similar


Ex Input:
Sent1: You can attempt say I'm being illogical, but you have yet to explain why the death penalty is preferable to imprisonment.
 Sent2: I suppose you could say "well it keeps them from harming society" but so does the death penalty.

Ex Output:

Not similar