In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Example Input: Comment: 2 fucking charges of 1st degree and 1 for second degree for a chicken really popo woooow must be a slow day
Example Output: Obscene

Example Input: Comment: Sigh ... sadly evoking a some commenters here on the R-G site who define every new Donald Trump revelation as simply losers whining about the results of the last election, I have to say, as the feces continues to move into the fan with the power and consistency of a conveyor belt, that (damn) if ever there was an agenda this country needed, it was the politics of Bernie Sanders. Reform systems skewed for the wealthiest 1%, reform the worst health care system in the developed nations, reform the economics of higher education, and do what we can to halt the human damage to our planet. Hindsight and all that; and (damn) I didn't even vote for him in the primary.
Example Output: Obscene

Example Input: Comment: If a non-aboriginal had been appointed to head up the inquiry, there would have been a number of complaints that it would be just another example of the white man trying to bury a problem. Appointing an aboriginal should satisfy the aboriginal community, but presents the same bias in reverse. If things are as bad as some reports suggest, Senator Sinclair, is about to run into a stone wall when it comes to co-operation.
Example Output:
Non-obscene