Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.

Example Input: Eugene "elects" a progressive  (aka:socialist/liberal)  mayor? NO WAY! 

It's like I have a crystal ball in predicting just how bassackwards this town can be in its liberal agenda. 

@Garycrum  "...the people have spoke..."???   Blind people leading blind people (or electing) is a clear demonstration of just how uninformed and uneducated the voters are on real issues,  not to mention basic facts and statistics that prove that socialist regimes (Bernie) never work.  And ask who's a successful criminal.... to Hillary Clinton.  

This town is sad and pathetic. It reminds me of a kitchen full of drone sweeper robots who's batteries are near dead from sweeping up so much garbage.
Example Output: Yes

Example Input: I think the 'millions of people' who have voted against Hillary by voting 'for' Trump is equally important.   And will be at least as important in November.  What happens to the 'for' Bernie vote in November is perhaps the most important this year.
Example Output: No

Example Input: You all are pedo loving pussys i know this comment will get rejected like my last but thats okay you still see it when you say it isnt civil. SHOOT ALL THE PEDOS AND NIGGERS!
Example Output:
Yes