Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.

IF it was a random crime (and I am doubtful, but that is just me, just now), how long do we lock someone like this up? can they ever become a 'good' person? do we throw away the key? hang 'em?
Yes

And how does corporate welfare we are all paying for, in a global economy suit your careful sensibility? The narrow focus of one aspect of manipulation of so much that is interconnected, shows how you could move elsewhere, yet still manage to complain about indigenous land ownership in perpetuity.

They had all that before the European industrial revolution allowed them to steal with impunity. And treaty upon treaty was supposed to allow them to recover from that loss; yet the indigenous peoples were repeatedly put into a smaller holding cell & given less rations than previously.

You are on stolen property & yet would seek to stand 'your' ground there? ;)
No

Gee I recall how on at least two occasions when tax payers stood before the Eugene City Council and flat out rejected proposed tax schemes yet the City of Eugene went ahead and place those on a ballot only later to be defeated. So what is the real problem with placing a rural measure on the ballot by Lane County, other then the cost of the measure in ballot  print form. Seems governments in Lane County have some strange type of issues when it comes to making available an actual vote of the people.

Yes