In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

[EX Q]: Sentence: I put the cake away in the refrigerator. It has a lot of leftovers in it.
 Reason: The 'It' refers to the refrigerator because refrigerators is where we save food,so it may have leftovers. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
[EX A]: Correct

[EX Q]: Sentence: The dog chased the cat, which ran up a tree. It waited at the bottom.
 Reason: The 'It' refers to the dog because the red should refer to the dog. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
[EX A]: Correct

[EX Q]: Sentence: The delivery truck zoomed by the school bus because it was going so fast.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the delivery truck because it was going too fast for the school bus to respond. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
[EX A]:
Wrong