In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Input: Consider Input: Comment: It's up to law enforcement to investigate and prosecute crimes, not employers.  I fail to see how an employer becomes responsible for the actions of employees off of the employer's property.  She's got an insane attorney and a heck of a lot of nerve.  I wish the University would let this go to trial, but everyone knows there will be a huge settlement.

Output: Non-sexual-explicit


Input: Consider Input: Comment: A well articulated opinion. Sadly, Ms Wente grossly underestimates the power of the vast hordes of broader public sector employees and their Unions to mobilize the vote for whoever is promising the status quo for them. So long as they are kept in the lap of luxury, with all the attendant 5-star perks that others can only dream of, no party preaching fiscal restraint can ever win. Exactly what Justin did, promising to spend more.
For all of Trumps darker sides, his pro economy pro business model is slowly starting to appeal to voters of all stripes, except perhaps the extreme socialists. It would be nice of other mature economies can emulate Trumponomics minus the unpleasant elements like anti trade, anti [legal] immigrant policies.

Output: Non-sexual-explicit


Input: Consider Input: Comment: So Hillary as mean to some people? Yes, I can see where that equates to grabbing women by the genitals, uncontrollably kissing them without their permission, using your fame and money to prey on women, trying to get married women to screw you while you yourself are married,talking about their "big phony tits and everything," body shaming and otherwise denigrating women publically in general, talking about dating your own daughter and just being a general slime bag. Yeah, I can see that.


Output: Sexual-explicit