We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Ex Input:
Sent1: I'd have to do more research into the death penalty website before believing the facts they present.
 Sent2: So all in all I believe in the death penalty.

Ex Output:
Not similar


Ex Input:
Sent1: But life imprisonment without parole also deters the criminal from recommitting.
 Sent2: A life sentence does not prevent a murderer from murdering again.

Ex Output:
Similar


Ex Input:
Sent1: Unless there can be solid uncontestable evidence shown that the death penalty is significant in deterring crime, this cannot be used as an argument for the death penalty.
 Sent2: Therefore the argument of death as a deterent is a joke.

Ex Output:

Similar