In this task you need to give reasons to justify the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a question about how to justify the coreference between a noun phrase and the target pronoun. Good practices involve the discussion about how the descriptions attached to the targeted pronoun relate to the noun phrase candidate in the question. The reasoning could come from one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. Write the sentence in natural language.

Q: Sentence: The fish ate the worm. It was tasty.
 Question: Why does the 'It' refer to the worm?

A: Because The worm is the main object that the very (ate) refers to.
****
Q: Sentence: Emma did not pass the ball to Janie although she was open.
 Question: Why does the 'she' refer to janie?

A: Because Emma chose to not pass even when Janie was able to catch.
****
Q: Sentence: The trophy doesn't fit into the brown suitcase because it is too small.
 Question: Why does the 'it' refer to the suitcase?

A:
Because it's more likely for the brown suitcase to be to small in order to fit the trophy inside. IF it was the trophy it wouldn't make sense.
****