TASK DEFINITION: In this task, you will be shown a sentence, and you should determine whether it is overruling or non-overruling. In law, an overruling sentence is a statement that nullifies a previous case decision as a precedent by a constitutionally valid statute or a decision by the same or higher ranking court which establishes a different rule on the point of law involved. Classify your answers into overruling or non-overruling
PROBLEM: siewe v. gonzales, 480 f.3d 160, 170 (2d cir. 2007) (""[a] single false document or a single instance of false testimony may (if attributable to the petitioner) infect the balance of the alien's uncorroborated or unauthenticated evidence."").

SOLUTION: non-overruling

PROBLEM: to the extent that our opinions in baker v. mayor and city council of baltimore, 894 f.2d 679, 682 (4th cir.), cert. denied, 498 u.s. 815 (1990), and schlitz v. commonwealth of virginia, 854 f.2d 43, 45-46 (4th cir. 1988), can be read to confer legislative immunity on municipalities from suits brought under section 1983, those decisions are overruled.

SOLUTION: overruling

PROBLEM: unlike the situation where there is no forum-selection clause, the plaintiff ""must bear the burden of showing why the court should not transfer the case to the forum to which the parties agreed.""

SOLUTION:
non-overruling