In this task, you're given a statement, and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence clearly disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3' corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.

Example Input: Statement: An attorney representing a client before judge and jury was no longer the norm of a case when delivering critical legal services to low-income individuals. Choices:  1. Attorneys representing low-income individuals are the norm. 2. The norm of the case was violated when the attorney delivered their services. 3. Low-income individuals are often targeted by the justice system because of their inability to finance their legal battles.
Example Output: 1

Example Input: Statement: The NRCS economic analysis is discussed in the preamble to the final rule. Choices:  1. The final rule includes an NRCS economic analysis. 2. The NRCS analysis takes up two pages in the final rule. 3. The NRCS economic analysis is excluded from the final rule.
Example Output: 3

Example Input: Statement: Yessiree. Choices:  1. Absolutely. 2. No, absolutely not. 3. It was definitive.
Example Output:
2