In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

[EX Q]: Comment: Morneau is using the left wing buzzword "fair".  Thus whole exercise is about inflamming opinion in the hope that the " soak the rich" crowd votes liberal instead of ndp, which makes your position particularly hypocritical
[EX A]: Non-obscene

[EX Q]: Comment: AMEN!
[EX A]: Non-obscene

[EX Q]: Comment: Steven, we need to be a bit more circumspect here, surely? 

It's only treason if Trump colluded with the Russians. Its perfectly possible the Russians did it entirely on their own initiative for their own purposes. All that Russian contact could have been stupid supports trying to make nice with the Russians with a view to making the world a saver place, but the Russians were using all that contact "to play" those supports for their own ends. That's naive, not treasonous. 

Me, I figure either (1) the Russian do have something on Trump, perhaps salacious, perhaps financial, or (2) Flynn has something on Trump, perhaps no more than that he (Flynn) was meeting with the Russians under Trump's orders for a very wide range of purposes that Trump would rather keep secret.
[EX A]:
Non-obscene