Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
--------
Question: If it were true that you just received a(n) email from a teacher with that many errors, and assuming you have the ability to count and correct each one, then you'd be able to provide a specific number instead of an ambiguous range, along with examples of the most egregious mistakes. SYH won't help with this fairy tale, but I can.

"Teacher" is singular, "them" and "their" are plural. You flunked.

Answer: No


Question: Why listen to anything the Rasmuson Foundation says?  Their business model is one that GIVES money away.  The State of Alaska is broke and can not be giving money away.  We can't afford to be an entitlement society any more.  No punitive income taxes.  Government needs to be cut 25% like the oil companies have cut.  Then have at it with cutting the PFD.

Answer: No


Question: Let's not prejudge (as in "prejudice"). Let's keep an open mind and hope for the best. We may be surprised.  There's a lot to criticize in this world. I do my share of it. But I see a lot of negative thinking in people's comments (I'm speaking generally here) sometimes with no other point than to nitpick and be negative. Some of that energy needs to be turned to positive, solution oriented thinking and actions. Otherwise, we're creating the very world we say we don't want.

Answer:
No