We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Q: Sent1: I support the death penalty, but feel there needs to be a better system of checks and balances to ensure each individual gets a fair trial using all evidentiary methods available.
 Sent2: There shouldn't be a death penalty it isn't fair.

A: Not similar
****
Q: Sent1: There has been so much cases of people who have been executed, only to be found innocent after their death.
 Sent2: "We know for a FACT that innocent people have been put to death already"- then give me their names.

A: Similar
****
Q: Sent1: With trials and appeals, one execution can end up costing more than a life sentence by the time the execution is actually carried out.
 Sent2: Actually, the idea that the death penalty costs more than lifetime imprisonment has been disproved many times.

A:
Similar
****