We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gay Marriage) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gay marriage. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gay marriage.

Example Input: Since you are heterosexual and have rallied against gay rights/gay marriage you have done this and are therefore imposing your religion on others.
Example Output: Valid

Example Input: Funny that the author didn't look at lost inhetitance taxes, which could easily offset the income tax advatage stated above, the additional cost in SS survivor benefits and additional corporate healthcare costs.
Example Output: Valid

Example Input: But not by recognizing gay unions as marriage, any more than recognizing a 25 year old as criteria to receive social security, or a healthy non-disabled person criteria for disability.
Example Output:
Valid