We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

Example Input: I'd love to know what firearms are made and sold but have no constitutional protection for ownership.
Example Output: Valid

Example Input: In fact, gun control laws have been around for over 200 years so apparently the founding fathers didn't see the second amendment as a barrier to such laws.
Example Output: Valid

Example Input: Whilst the true term as I mentioned before: Well regulated referred to the property of something being in proper working order.
Example Output:
Valid