We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

Example Input: You can't just claim "Country A has more gun control and a lower homicide rate than Country B does" and leave it at that.
Example Output: Valid

Example Input: If a criminal steals a legally purchased gun from a law abiding gun owner, we are still faced with a situation where the criminal's actions and intent are to blame, not the gun itself.
Example Output: Valid

Example Input: Even gun hating knife hating, sword hating, pizza cutter hating, citizen rights hating england still allow airsoft.
Example Output:
Valid