Given a paragraph about movies and a set of conversational questions and answers about the paragraph, say whether the passage contains sufficient information to answer the follow-up question. Say Yes if it is answerable; otherwise, say No. The paragraph has the prefix 'CONTEXT:'. Each conversation question has a prefix `Q:` followed by the answer prefix `A:`, and the follow-up question has a prefix `FOLLOWUP_Q:`.

Input: Consider Input: CONTEXT: This has been unanswered for too long, so I'm just going to say it. NO. That is not him. Beyond throwing CGI money away on such an inconsequential shot, if you look at the other man's features you'll notice much different bone and cartilage structures around the eye sockets, more-centered zygomatic bones (cheekbones), and a more acute angle where the nasal bones indent and leave the brow. Plus, this man looks nothing like The Professor / Bernard Fallon (Borden's alter-ego). I see no reason to assume this is anything other than someone reading too much into a slight resemblance. Do I have definitive proof? No, I do not. Also, I have difficulty in seeing any kind of compelling resemblance between the two men. Another thing to consider is that the twins kept public contact at a minimum. They did not seem to "hang out" together. This is explained by Borden's reveal of the so-called "frail" old Chinese magician whose act was basically performed off-stage; ie: the man was fit enough to work heavy bowls of water but presented himself as a feeble old man who required canes and / or assistance to go to and from the theater. That was the real act. Borden would not likely risk exposure by sitting next to himself.  <sep>  Q: Is Borden's secret revealed as soon as the 11th minute of the movie? A: This has been unanswered for too long, so I'm just going to say it. NO. That is not him  Q: So, Borden doesn't have a twin brother? A: Borden would not likely risk exposure by sitting next to himself  Q: Okay, when I watched I noticed a man that looked like Christian Bale sitting next to Borden, am I mistaken? A: I see no reason to assume this is anything other than someone reading too much into a slight resemblance  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Okay, so there isn't a secret revealed throughout the entire movie?

Output: Yes


Input: Consider Input: CONTEXT: When The Six Million Dollar Man premiered (1973) in the United States had just ended its involvement in the Vietnam War. The US military was not held in high regards in many circles and having Austin be a veteran might have been seen as "problematic." The pilot seems to have done away with this by having Austin be a civilian test pilot who was the only civilian ever sent to the Moon. After two additional television films (during which Steve Austin was returned to his former military rank) the series was picked up by ABC as a weekly series in 1974. The improbability of Austin having been a civilian astronaut was probably brought the attention of the producers who simply changed the back story during the second pilot film. In this respect, the television series began to match Martin Caidin's novels. The show later expanded upon Austin's background adding a family and then later love interest, Jamie Sommers, who herself became The Bionic Woman.  <sep>  Q: What plot points/cultural significance would making Steve Austin a civilian member of NASA have served? A: The pilot seems to have done away with this by having Austin be a civilian test pilot who was the only civilian ever sent to the Moon  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: i have not read the Martin Caidin novels, but evidently he held the military rank and background in those.

Output: Yes


Input: Consider Input: CONTEXT: I would suggest that the Teletubbies are not cyborgs. The peculiar antenna and visual display appendages are naturally occurring adaptations which allow them to exist in symbiotic harmony with humans. They display a distinct and uncontrollable physiological requirement for the reception of (mostly) childrens basic and crucially, innocent thought patterns. This coupled with our own natural requirement for congnative and social development; the 'Tubbies' use their individual personalities and applicable talents to display moral and ethical guidance, through the performance of simplistic song, dance and play scenarios... I would therefore classify them as Symbiote.  <sep>  Q: Are the teletubbies cyborgs? A: I would suggest that the Teletubbies are not cyborgs  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Why would you come to this conclusion when they have implanted televisions?


Output: Yes