The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.

Context: 'How many of you are on the camping grounds?' 'It's just my family. There are 6 of us total' 'Wow. I’m alone here. I could use an extra food and water. '
Utterance: 'How many would you like? I just want to make sure we have enough good and water because there are so many of us'
Yes

Context: 'Kindly understand our need as we are struggling with hunger now.' 'At the same from my side. We need foods because my child is hunger'
Utterance: 'We with our kids undergone fasting in the recent days, so we are hungry to the peak'
Yes

Context: 'No i absolutely need 2 food packages. So if you cannot agree to take 1 food 2 water and 2 firewood i will walk away.  If you have children with you would would also need water which you are not asking for. ' 'Yes I too have children so only I am considering 2 food package, 1 water is enough for me and I dont need any firewood. So please accept this deal' '😡 I am walking away if i cannot get 2 food packages 1 water and 1 firewood. That leaves you with 1 food 2 waters and 2 firewoods. This is a good deal for you concidering that you havent been asking for water for your children until i mentioned that you need water for you children. Do you agree??'
Utterance: 'I already mentioned that 1 water is enough for me.But food is my only priority for my children so you please consider this and help me in this.'

Yes