Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.

[Q]: You've tried to run a campaign several times, Fluetsch.  Why don't you organize a write-in campaign and unseat your district's incumbent?  Put up or shut up.
[A]: Yes


[Q]: "Unaffiliated voters for the most part tossed their ballots in the trash or the recycling bin, the data show."

I don't think the data even address how voters disposed of their ballots. Perhaps they burned them or used them as birdcage liner. Perhaps they are saving them for another election day, hoping to get in the last word. Maybe Lucy Vinis was just excited to see her name in print and she autographed and framed several copies for her friends.

The tally was heavily buoyed, by the way.
[A]: No


[Q]: I live in a state where property rights are elevated above all other concerns.  Garbage dumps exist beside salmon streams, wrecked cars are stacked in a backyard right beside homes in neighborhoods.  Anyone can build a sawmill or establish a kennel full of constantly barking dogs next to your dream home.  Wetlands are deeply important to maintaining clean water and a habitat for many animals and for flood control.  But none of these concerns matter against the rights of a person to do anything, no matter how irresponsible, with their own property.   Clean water is important to everyone.  At some point everyone needs to be willing to compromise to keep our land livable for all.  I'll agree with making the process more affordable, but if you buy wetlands you should be willing to be responsible for it.
[A]:
No