In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

[EX Q]: Comment: Wait a minute. That woman is perfectly able to talk about her "husband".  How do you know she is NOT Gay, and she is the female half?
[EX A]: Identity-attack

[EX Q]: Comment: If_Peter_were_the_leader,_Paul_would_have_acknowldged_him_in_Romans._He_did_not.
[EX A]: Non-identity-attack

[EX Q]: Comment: I agree. The author is simply parroting the Liberal/left/progressive notion that the majority of people  are not as intellectually qualified as they are to assess the issues that effect them. It is the usual rationale in support of the repression of views contrary to the LLP narrative.
[EX A]:
Non-identity-attack