In this task, you will be presented with a context from an academic paper and a question separated with a 
. You have to answer the question based on the context.

Example Input: However, as shown in Figure 1 , to assess the similarity between two research papers, a more effective strategy would compare and align (via local-weighting) individual important words (keywords) within a pair of abstracts, while information from other words (e.g., stop words) that tend to be less relevant can be effectively ignored (down-weighted).  We propose to learn a semantic-aware Network Embedding (NE) that incorporates word-level alignment features abstracted from text sequences associated with vertex pairs. Given a pair of sentences, our model first aligns each word within one sentence with keywords from the other sentence (adaptively up-weighted via an attention mechanism), producing a set of fine-grained matching vectors 
 Question: What text sequences are associated with each vertex?
Example Output: abstracts sentences

Example Input: We collected tweets related to five different DDoS attacks on three different American banks. For each attack, all the tweets containing the bank's name posted from one week before the attack until the attack day were collected. There are in total 35214 tweets in the dataset. Only the tweets from the Bank of America attack on 09/19/2012 were used in this experiment. In this subsection we evaluate how good the model generalizes. To achieve that, the dataset is divided into two groups, one is about the attacks on Bank of America and the other group is about PNC and Wells Fargo. The only difference between this experiment and the experiment in section 4.4 is the dataset. In this experiment setting $D_a$ contains only the tweets collected on the days of attack on PNC and Wells Fargo. $D_b$ only contains the tweets collected before the Bank of America attack. 
 Question: What is the training and test data used?
Example Output: Tweets related to a Bank of America DDos attack were used as training data. The test datasets contain tweets related to attacks to Bank of America, PNC and Wells Fargo.

Example Input: We considered UD1.2 corpora for the following 16 languages: Bulgarian, Croatian, Czech, Danish, English, French, German, Indonesian, Italian, Norwegian, Persian, Polish, Portuguese, Slovenian, Spanish and Swedish. 
 Question: which languages are explored?
Example Output:
Bulgarian, Croatian, Czech, Danish, English, French, German, Indonesian, Italian, Norwegian, Persian, Polish, Portuguese, Slovenian, Spanish and Swedish