The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the self-need strategy, otherwise output No. self-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to create a personal need for an item in the negotiation, such as by pointing out that the participant sweats a lot to show preference towards water packages.

[Q]: Context: 'I would give you all of the additional food if you gave me all of the additional water. ' 'That sounds like a deal' 'Shall we divide the firewood two to one? '
Utterance: 'sure as long as I am getting two wood.   It gets very cold at night where I go camping'
[A]: Yes


[Q]: Context: 'I don't think you that fat, your lipids will help you stay warm and full out there, haha' 'Im not as good at you at foraginf for food and water i probably dont have the experience as you do being in the outdoors and living off the land.🙂' 'With the extra firewood, you can hunt for fish and other animals outside to thrive'
Utterance: 'i cant hunt if i dont have the proper nutritional value to make sure i can make it that long.  how about i get 2 firewood 2 water and 1 food you get the rest'
[A]: Yes


[Q]: Context: 'Well, I really need water in case we get really thirsty from hiking. I also need firewood in case it gets colder and we need more. It would be cool to have more food added for dessert like s'mores, but it's not really necessary.' 'How about you take all the water and one of the firewoods, and I can have all the food and 2 of the firewoods' 'Let me think about it. What supplies do you need?'
Utterance: 'I won't be doing a lot of hiking, but will probably have a few campfires with food'
[A]:
Yes