We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Ex Input:
Sent1: Some people who want to ban guns try to use simplistic arguments to suggest that murder rates are tied to the number of guns available for criminal misuse; and they suggest more guns = more crime and less guns = less crime.
 Sent2: I also say that when people commit a crime with a gun these people need to be punished not the law-abiding citizens!

Ex Output:
Not similar


Ex Input:
Sent1: So guns kept in a home appear to attract criminals rather than deter them.
 Sent2: Even "If criminals keep their guns",(if we were to confiscate all guns) " they wont be able to use them.

Ex Output:
Not similar


Ex Input:
Sent1: Are you saying that since all guns have been banned for civilian use in Countries like England, that murders by guns and gun crimes have gone to absolute zero there?
 Sent2: Are you saying that trying to avoid being murdered isn't a good enough reason for owning or using a gun?

Ex Output:

Not similar