TASK DEFINITION: Given a passage, construct a question on the basis of the information present in the passage. Construct the question in such a way that (i) it is unambiguous, (ii) it is answerable from the passage, (iii) its answer is unique (iv) it answer uses text phrases from the passage. Avoid creating questions that (i) can't be answered correctly without actually understanding the passage and (ii) uses the same words or phrases given in the passage.
PROBLEM: Successful treatment of oesophageal cancer is hampered by recurrent drug resistant disease. We have previously demonstrated the importance of apoptosis and autophagy for the recovery of oesophageal cancer cells following drug treatment. When apoptosis (with autophagy) is induced, these cells are chemosensitive and will not recover following chemotherapy treatment. In contrast, when cancer cells exhibit only autophagy and limited Type II cell death, they are chemoresistant and recover following drug withdrawal.', 'MicroRNA (miRNA) expression profiling of an oesophageal cancer cell line panel was used to identify miRNAs that were important in the regulation of apoptosis and autophagy. The effects of miRNA overexpression on cell death mechanisms and recovery were assessed in the chemoresistant (autophagy inducing) KYSE450 oesophageal cancer cells.', 'MiR-193b was the most differentially expressed miRNA between the chemosensitive and chemoresistant cell lines with higher expression in chemosensitive apoptosis inducing cell lines. Colony formation assays showed that overexpression of miR-193b significantly impedes the ability of KYSE450 cells to recover following 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) treatment. The critical mRNA targets of miR-193b are unknown but target prediction and siRNA data analysis suggest that it may mediate some of its effects through stathmin 1 regulation. Apoptosis was not involved in the enhanced cytotoxicity. Overexpression of miR-193b in these cells induced autophagic flux and non-apoptotic cell death.

SOLUTION: Does miR-193b promote autophagy and non-apoptotic cell death in oesophageal cancer cells?

PROBLEM: Fish oil (FO) supplementation prevents the development of obesity and insulin resistance, and upregulate the expression of UCP3 in skeletal muscle in rodents. This may represent indirect evidence that FO promotes fat oxidation and/or alter energy efficiency. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether such effects can be observed in humans. The metabolic effects of FO were assessed during exercise in order to obtain a direct measurement of energy efficiency.', 'Eight healthy male volunteers were studied with and without supplementation with 7.2 g/day FO (including 1.1 g/day eicosopentaenoic acid and 0.7 g/day decosahexaenoic acid) during 14 days. Their VO(2 max) was measured on cycle ergometer. Thereafter, energy metabolism (substrate oxidation, energy expenditure and energy efficiency) was assessed during a 30 min cycling exercise at 50% VO(2 max) performed 2 h 30 after a standardized, high carbohydrate breakfast.', 'VO(2 max) was 38.6+/-2.2 after FO and 38.4+/-2.0 (mL x kg(-1) x min(-1)) in control conditions (NS). Basal plasma glucose, insulin and NEFA concentrations, and energy metabolism were similar with FO and in controls. During exercise, the increases in plasma NEFA concentrations, energy expenditure, glucose and lipid oxidation, and the decreases in glycaemia and insulinemia were not altered by FO intake. Energy efficiency was 22.4+/-0.6% after FO vs 21.8+/-0.7% in controls. In order to ascertain that the absence of effects of FO was not due to consumption of a carbohydrate meal immediately before exercise, 4 of the 8 subjects were re-studied in fasting conditions, FO also failed to alter energy efficiency in this subset of studies.

SOLUTION: Does fish oil supplementation alter energy efficiency in healthy males?

PROBLEM: The LAP Mentor is a procedural simulator that provides a stepwise training for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. This study addresses its "construct" validity that is present when a simulator is able to discriminate between persons with known differences in performance level on the laparoscopic cholecystectomy in real life.', 'Three groups with different skill levels performed 2 trials of 4 distinct parts of the cholecystectomy procedure (cholecystectomy exercises) and 1 full procedure on the LAP Mentor. Assessment parameters concerning the quantity and the quality of performance were compared between groups using the Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests.', 'The entire research was performed in the Center for Surgical Technologies, Leuven, Belgium.', 'For study purposes, 5 expert abdominal laparoscopists (>100 laparoscopic cholecystectomies performed), 11 surgical residents (10-30 cholecystectomies performed), and 10 novices (minimal laparoscopic experience) were recruited.', 'With regard to the quantity of performance (time needed and number of movements), the experts showed significantly better results compared with the novices in the cholecystectomy exercises. Only in the full procedure, the results of all the parameters (except speed) were significantly different between the 3 groups, with the best results observed for the experts and worst for the novices. With respect to quality of performance, only the parameter "accuracy rate of dissection" in exercise 3 showed significantly better performance by the experts.

SOLUTION:
Does assessment of procedural skills using virtual simulation remain a challenge?