instruction:
The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the self-need strategy, otherwise output No. self-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to create a personal need for an item in the negotiation, such as by pointing out that the participant sweats a lot to show preference towards water packages.
question:
Context: 'Thanks. Yea they do  love their snacks LOL. Yea I just need 1 extra food. Snice I wasn't planning on her friend coming. ' 'Okay, then the deal you mentioned earlier sounds good to me. You're okay with me getting 3 water 2 food and you getting 3 firewood and 1 food?' '🙂 Yep sounds like it will help us out the best snice you need water and food for your hike and I need firewood and just 1 food here at the camp.'
Utterance: 'Okay, then that sounds like a good deal for us both! It was a pleasure doing business with you, thanks!🙂'
answer:
No


question:
Context: 'Yeah, I think I'm okay with firewood, but I'd really like more food and water.' 'That fine then. If you want you can have most of the water and I can have most of the firewood. Sounds good?' 'That seems fine. How do you want to split the food? I grew up poor so I'm always afraid of starving 😮'
Utterance: 'Oh, yea I get that. I have a family so I need some food too. But just to clarify, are the original plan was to get 3 firewood for me and 3 waters for u right? '
answer:
No


question:
Context: 'Alright. Thanks. I only ask for so much of the water because I am overweight and I know while camping I'll work up a huge sweat.' 'Great, that sounds good to me, are you okay with keeping all the food or would 3 be too much?' 'I'd be ok with keeping all the food. I do eat a bit too much and if for some reason I get lost it would be helpful to have!'
Utterance: 'I agree with that, so you would get the two water and three food and I would get one water and three firewood?'
answer:

No