Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.

[Q]: Once I had a toddler try to knock me off my bike with a snowball. The parent did nothing. I stopped and put the fear of god into that little *#@#! until it hid behind its parent's leg. People don't control their kids and then expect us all to rise to their defense. Kids are jerks. I think you have a good point here (though it was made somewhat in jest).
[A]: Yes


[Q]: Exactly.  We can't change the price of oil, but we can change our legislators.  

Perhaps some day we'll look back and realize that the oil crash was the best thing to happen to us, since it exposed the legislators for who they really are.  Not having money is a bad thing.  Not having ethical leaders is a terrible thing.
[A]: No


[Q]: The Republicans who promised "trickle down" (a part of the revered Reagonomics) have been in Congress for the last 8 years, obstructing nearly all of Obama's proposals. Romney ran on a platform of top to bottom wealth. Lower class Republicans rejected Romney.
But you can see from the graph in this link that the .1% have as much wealth as 90% of Americans. If you're pissed about failing to see wealth, so down to Carmel or San Luis Obispo.  This is where America is great. https://psmag.com/the-imf-confirms-that-trickle-down-economics-is-indeed-a-joke-207d7ca469b#.nbbi0b5oi
[A]:
No