TASK DEFINITION: We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.
PROBLEM: Sent1: My point was that the theory that more gun control leaves people defenseless does not explain the lower murder rates in other developed nations.
 Sent2: A much higher gun ownership rate than other developed nations could explain this- that although crime occurs less frequently in the US crime is more likely to involve guns in the US so someone is more likely to die.

SOLUTION: Not similar

PROBLEM: Sent1: The 2nd Amendment is not there to entitle you to all of the gun control you want!
 Sent2: Simply put, you should have to prove that the gun control you seek will do what you say it will do before burdening the Constitution with a load up of Liberal wishes and hopes!

SOLUTION: Not similar

PROBLEM: Sent1: The first part indicates the importance of the militia, the second part illustrates that the people may be part of that well regulated body or not without infringement of their right to keep and bear arms.
 Sent2: 2) ensure that the right to keep and bear arms for a militia is not infringed.

SOLUTION:
Similar