In this task, you're given a statement, and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence clearly disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3' corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.

Ex Input:
Statement: More ominously, the Star reports that the actress is actually planning to give him another chance and wants to try a second honeymoon after he gets out of jail for assaulting her. Choices:  1. After he serves his time in prison, she plans on rekindling their love affair.  2. She wants to take him to the Bahamas once he gets out of jail.  3. The actress has absolutely no plans of getting back together with her husband. 

Ex Output:
3


Ex Input:
Statement: It means that instead of blandly assuming less regulation is better than more or more competition is better than less, you have to study the specifics of each case very carefully. Choices:  1. Studying the specifics of every case is what it means. 2. If you don't study the specifics, you won't get it right. 3. There's no need to study the specifics, not at all.

Ex Output:
3


Ex Input:
Statement: It describes the reasons for the proposed agency action, and its objectives and legal basis. Choices:  1. It describes why the agency action was proposed to the EPA. 2. It describes why the agency action was proposed. 3. It has no explanation for the agency's actions.

Ex Output:

3