In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.
--------
Question: Comment: Rules about sex, formulated by the celibate, based on dubious interpretations of scripture (which says NOTHING about oral sex, for example) and grounded in the silly opinion that sexual activity has to be "justified" by saying it must be for procreation (a view that owes more to the Gnostics, the Neoplatonists and the Roman Stoics than scripture) are less than compelling.

Answer: Sexual-explicit


Question: Comment: Peeing in the park/alley when you think no one is looking is not an offense that requires registration as a sex offender in the State of Colorado. It does not meet the elements of Indecent Exposure, which requires a KNOWING exposure of genitals to the view of another person when done with the intent to arouse. It also does not meet the elements of Public Indecency (which only requires registration after a second conviction within 5 years), which requires a KNOWING exposure of genitals to the view of another person.

Also, the juvenile sex offender registry is not made available to the public in the same way as the adult sex offender registry. And first-time juvenile sex offenders are able to petition for de-registration once they have successfully completed their sentence.

Answer: Sexual-explicit


Question: Comment: Option 5: just drop the useless thing. Everyone knows who kills indigenous women but this is not what the indigenous leader wants to talk about, they want to talk about the police and "systemic racicism". This reminds me of Black Lives Matters who attacks the police for killing black men but won't talk about black on black crimes that kills way more black men then the police.

Answer:
Non-sexual-explicit