In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Q: Comment: Wow! There were two fake news ads on the site as a logged in...see it's about the money. Faux News makes money by ginning up the adrenal glands of viewers...the Jerry Springer of broadcasts. And even the name is fake 'cause it ain't news. When Drudge Report posts something fake and then Faux picks it up, and 'reporters' parrot as it now it's news? This is stupid journalism...like reporting each gush from the Twit in Chief as if this was news...it's at best a yawn. Of course journalism that uses the tweets by the twit to show how grossly unqualified just adds fuel...still not news. Journalism at it's best seeking the truth -- this is why we need intelligent opinions as the context is complex. But not all beliefs are news. Not all opinions deserve an airing. We need to shame those who foment fear and terror as what they are, terrorist recruiters. The nominee for national security advisor is one, as is his son. They almost caused the death of innocent people. Fake news undermines America.

A: Non-sexual-explicit
****
Q: Comment: There are more important things to worry about instead of bathroom laws and transgender rights. Once again, USA  is the laughing stock of the world.

A: Non-sexual-explicit
****
Q: Comment: "Santa Barbara feel." You mean walkable, well kept sidewalks. Livable, nice even. Not the dumping ground for homeless drug addicts and prostitutes that it looks like now. The Ammo Can has enough parking. I never see that lot full. I do see all the snow from that lot pushed in the way of any one on a bike or walking.

People in Anchorage need to get off their butts and walk to a business. Their doctors will be happier, and they will be healthier.

A:
Sexual-explicit
****