In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence can be inferred from the statement. Incorrect choices change the meaning in important ways or have details that are not mentioned in the statement. Indicate your answer as 1,2, or 3 corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.

[EX Q]: Statement: Another refreshing feature of Goodman's storytelling is that, unlike other members of fundamentalist sects one might find in novels, her characters don't chafe at their restrictions, or not too much. Choices:  1. Goodman's characters failing to question their restrictions is frustrating to read. 2. The fact that Goodman's characters in fundamental sects don't generally feel too restricted by the rules of their sects is a unique aspect of Goodman's storytelling. 3. The common novel story line that has members of fundamentalist sects yearning for freedom has become overused and stale.
[EX A]: 2

[EX Q]: Statement: He was pro-German, as he would have been pro-Boer. Choices:  1. He speaks fluent German. 2. German beliefs were ones he believed in. 3. The man is a loyal American.
[EX A]: 2

[EX Q]: Statement: Fully exploring the dynamics of personal saving behavior and gauging the adequacy of retirement saving are beyond the scope of this national saving report. Choices:  1. The national savings report fully explores the adequacy of retirement savings. 2. Most retirement savings accounts are considered to be inadequate. 3. The national savings report does not fully explore the dynamics of personal savings behavior.
[EX A]:
3