Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.

Example Input: You see? - taxes hurt our economy permanently. We compete against the entire world. We are totally blessed that we have a sustainable annual PF income of $2.5 billion without lifting a finger. Thanks Big Oil I guess.
Example Output: No

Example Input: What are the real issues in this case?  There is no background here, just discussion of money.  What legal principles are at stake here.  Impossible to make a determination without any information.   Perhaps the AG can write his own article so we can at least understand this case.
Example Output: No

Example Input: Beyond BS, be it SB 21 or ACES, no tax credit law for Alaska's oil should be structured to result in NO royalty revenue. Both SB21 and ACES were pushed by the cabal of Republican legislators to create an unbalanced contract.  Simply, Alaska's royalty should be no less than the profit gained by the oil producer.  Anything less is a give-away.  Now it is not only a give-away, but an insane result of paying the oil companies to "take without compensation" oil and gas that is first owned by Alaska.  As it stands, it is a criminal theft of Alaska's resource property.  The Alaska legislature must set right the situation (an undesirable situation): otherwise, "by the time a problem becomes patently obvious, it may be almost too late to remedy it."  If not remedied in this session then the immediate solution is to REMEMBER THIS IN NOVEMBER.
Example Output:
No