In this task, you will be presented with a context from an academic paper and a question separated with a 
. You have to answer the question based on the context.

Example Input: Cloze Track User Query Track 
 Question: What two types the Chinese reading comprehension dataset consists of?
Example Output: cloze-style reading comprehension and user query reading comprehension questions

Example Input: irremediable annotation discrepancies Some shortcomings of recall come from irremediable annotation discrepancies. Largely, we are hamstrung by differences in choice of attributes to annotate. When one resource marks gender and the other marks case, we can't infer the gender of the word purely from its surface form. The resources themselves would need updating to encode the relevant morphosyntactic information. Some languages had a very low number of overlapping forms, and no tag matches or near-matches between them: Arabic, Hindi, Lithuanian, Persian, and Russian. A full list of observed, irremediable discrepancies is presented alongside the codebase. We were able to find specific instances of incorrectly applied UniMorph annotation, as well as specific instances of cross-lingual inconsistency in both resources.  
 Question: What are the main sources of recall errors in the mapping?
Example Output: irremediable annotation discrepancies differences in choice of attributes to annotate The resources themselves would need updating to encode the relevant morphosyntactic information. Some languages had a very low number of overlapping forms, and no tag matches or near-matches between them the two annotations encode distinct information incorrectly applied UniMorph annotation cross-lingual inconsistency in both resources

Example Input: To compare with our model, we select a number of strong summarization models as baseline systems. $\textsc {Lead-X}$ uses the top $X$ sentences as a summary BIBREF19. $\textsc {DRM}$ BIBREF10 leverages deep reinforcement learning for summarization. $\textsc {TConvS2S}$ BIBREF2 is based on convolutional neural networks. $\textsc {BottomUp}$ BIBREF11 uses a bottom-up approach to generate summarization. ABS BIBREF26 uses neural attention for summary generation. DRGD BIBREF27 is based on a deep recurrent generative decoder. To compare with our pretrain-only model, we include several unsupervised abstractive baselines: SEQ$^3$ BIBREF28 employs the reconstruction loss and topic loss for summarization. BottleSum BIBREF23 leverages unsupervised extractive and self-supervised abstractive methods. GPT-2 BIBREF7 is a large-scaled pretrained language model which can be directly used to generate summaries. 
 Question: What were the baselines?
Example Output:
$\textsc {Lead-X}$ $\textsc {PTGen}$ $\textsc {DRM}$ $\textsc {TConvS2S}$  $\textsc {BottomUp}$ ABS DRGD SEQ$^3$ BottleSum GPT-2