We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Ex Input:
Sent1: So you have to read the 2nd amendment as a whole.
 Sent2: The 2nd Amendment is not there to entitle you to all of the gun control you want!

Ex Output:
Not similar


Ex Input:
Sent1: In other words the Miller case interpreted the Second Amendment to mean one has the right to own militia type weapons.
 Sent2: In the Miller case, the court essentially ruled that the second ammendment does indeed convey an individual right, but that the right in question is dependant on the type of weapon (i.e must be suitable for military use).

Ex Output:
Similar


Ex Input:
Sent1: Funny they weren't interested when 'they' were buying guns to give cartels by the truckload and were notified by the dealers.
 Sent2: The manufacturer tells them who the gun was shipped to, the dealer is contacted, and the dealer informs the ATF or the police of who the gun was sold to and when.

Ex Output:

Not similar