In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine the neutral choice based on your inference from the statement and your commonsense knowledge. The neutral choice is a sentence that neither agrees nor disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3', corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence. If sentence X agrees with sentence Y, one's correctness follows from the other one. If sentence X disagrees with sentence Y, they can not be correct at the same time.

Statement: In the case of H-2A workers, the reading would require the conclusion that Congress intended to provide H-2A workers with legal services representation on claims arising from their employment contracts only for the very brief periods that the workers are in the United States -- potentially rendering the promise of legal representation largely meaningless. Choices: 1. This reading would require the conclusion that Congress had intended for H-2A workers to only get legal representation when they were in the country. 2. This reading would require the conclusion that Congress had intended for H-2A workers to only get legal representation when they were outside of the country. 3. From a legal standpoint, most judges and legal scholars would agree that this is asking for chaos.
3

Statement: I remembered Mary as she lay white and exhausted on the sofa, listening, listening.  Choices: 1. Mary lay pale on the sofa as she listened. 2. What Mary was listening to made her pale in the face. 3. Mary sat on the sofa as she listened.
2

Statement: the GSA Inspector General has expressed concerns that GSA's organization and management structure has not kept pace with GSA's downsizing, streamlining, and reform efforts. Choices: 1. The GSA inspector general is worried they have downsized too much. 2. The GSA inspector general is worried they have not downsized enough. 3. The GSA inspector general is worried the 100 people they downsized was not enough.

3