In this task, you are given a part of an article. Your task is to generate headline (title) for this text. Preferred headlines are under fifteen words.

Example Input: The alternating direction method of multipliers (ADMM) has been recognized as a versatile approach for solving modern large-scale machine learning and signal processing problems efficiently. When the data size and/or the problem dimension is large, a distributed version of ADMM can be used, which is capable of distributing the computation load and the data set to a network of computing nodes. Unfortunately, a direct synchronous implementation of such algorithm does not scale well with the problem size, as the algorithm speed is limited by the slowest computing nodes. To address this issue, in a companion paper, we have proposed an asynchronous distributed ADMM (AD-ADMM) and studied its worst-case convergence conditions. In this paper, we further the study by characterizing the conditions under which the AD-ADMM achieves linear convergence. Our conditions as well as the resulting linear rates reveal the impact that various algorithm parameters, network delay and network size have on the algorithm performance. To demonstrate the superior time efficiency of the proposed AD-ADMM, we test the ADADMM on a high-performance computer cluster by solving a large-scale logistic regression problem. Keywords− Distributed optimization, ADMM, Asynchronous, Consensus optimization ⋆Tsung-Hui Chang is the corresponding author. Address: School of Science and Engineering, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen, China 518172, E-mail: tsunghui.chang@ieee.org. Wei-Cheng Liao is with Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA, E-mail: mhong@umn.edu Mingyi Hong is with Department of Industrial and Manufacturing Systems Engineering, Iowa State University, Ames, 50011, USA, E-mail: mingyi@iastate.edu Xiangfeng Wang is with Shanghai Key Lab for Trustworthy Computing, Software Engineering Institute, East China Normal University, Shanghai, 200062, China, E-mail: xfwang@sei.ecnu.edu.cn September 10, 2015 DRAFT
Example Output: Asynchronous Distributed ADMM for Large-Scale Optimization- Part II: Linear Convergence Analysis and Numerical Performance

Example Input: There are many complex combinatorial problems which involve searching for an undirected graph satisfying given constraints. Such problems are often highly challenging because of the large number of isomorphic representations of their solutions. This paper introduces effective and compact, complete symmetry breaking constraints for small graph search. Enumerating with these symmetry breaks generates all and only non-isomorphic solutions. For small search problems, with up to 10 vertices, we compute instance independent symmetry breaking constraints. For small search problems with a larger number of vertices we demonstrate the computation of instance dependent constraints which are complete. We illustrate the application of complete symmetry breaking constraints to extend two known sequences from the OEIS related to graph enumeration.
Example Output: Breaking Symmetries in Graph Search with Canonizing Sets

Example Input: We provide a systematic analysis of levels of integration between discrete high-level reasoning and continuous low-level reasoning to address hybrid planning problems in robotics. We identify four distinct strategies for such an integration: (i) low-level checks are done for all possible cases in advance and then this information is used during plan generation, (ii) low-level checks are done exactly when they are needed during the search for a plan, (iii) first all plans are computed and then infeasible ones are filtered, and (iv) by means of replanning, after finding a plan, low-level checks identify whether it is infeasible or not; if it is infeasible, a new plan is computed considering the results of previous lowlevel checks. We perform experiments on hybrid planning problems in robotic manipulation and legged locomotion domains considering these four methods of integration, as well as some of their combinations. We analyze the usefulness of levels of integration in these domains, both from the point of view of computational efficiency (in time and space) and from the point of view of plan quality relative to its feasibility. We discuss advantages and disadvantages of each strategy in the light of experimental results and provide some guidelines on choosing proper strategies for a given domain.
Example Output:
Levels of Integration between Low-Level Reasoning and Task Planning