We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Example Input: Sent1: There is an even smaller chance of an innocent person being sent to prison for the rest of their life, let alone to be convicted of a crime and sent to death.
 Sent2: People who commit bad crimes shouldn't be allowed to suffer in prison for the rest of their life.
Example Output: Not similar

Example Input: Sent1: The crimes meriting the death penalty are by-and-large not commited by those considering the consequences, no matter what those consequences may be.
 Sent2: That should be a crime which should result in the death penalty.
Example Output: Not similar

Example Input: Sent1: An argument regarding the death penalty should be confined to discussions regarding those who have been wrongly convicted and sentenced to death.
 Sent2: So what does he have to do with a debate like this about murderers and the death penalty?
Example Output:
Not similar