In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

[Q]: Comment: _"like all Republicans: show me the money"_ -- GoDucks!

I have to love this. Some anonymous person, posting as "GoDucks!" is trying to knock a candidate for raising money.
 
Ummm. It's Nike's money that has turned UO from an educational institution into a semi-pro athletic money machine and party school.

Go Ducks indeed!

-- Paul
[A]: Non-identity-attack


[Q]: Comment: Hmmmmm.
Let me see.  Someone to the south of us was just judged best suited for the task of the presidency solely because of his business background.
And he was celebrated during the campaign because he didn't "come across as "wishy washy."
That ain't working out too well. 
Maybe we should apply some other criteria when selecting these guys.
To quote Betrand Russell:
"The trouble with the world is that the stupid are cocksure and the intelligent are full of doubt."
[A]: Non-identity-attack


[Q]: Comment: Sure, white people are to blame for everything. Go pick up a history book.
[A]:
Identity-attack