In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.
--------
Question: Comment: Oh yes, Arliss Sturgulewski.  Born Jane Wright, but I guess no one would remember that name as opposed to Arliss Sturgulewski.  Anyway, I digress.  Joe Vogler's halfway respectable showing in 1986 had much to do with Sturgulewski making it clear that she wanted nothing to do with anyone who supported any of her primary opponents.  Here in Fairbanks, the few supporters she had in 1990 were the same little coffee klatsch of liberal Republicans who would meet regularly to plot against the rest of the party.  Incidentally, one of that group wound up in Parnell's cabinet, but I likewise digress.  That same group later brought us the equally-as-disastrous choice of Jim Campbell.

Answer: Non-sexual-explicit


Question: Comment: We are gonna send all the Muslims you can handle.

That should shut you up you globalist dick

Answer: Sexual-explicit


Question: Comment: Okay everyone be quiet as the PMO is meeting. Let's listen in shall we?

Butts: Okay where is the leak on this stuff? Days ago someone spilled the beans on the terrorist payout and now this!

Trudeau: Ummm, Canadians realize umm and want...

Butts: Justin shut up, Katie will prepare a script for you. 

Telford: I knew this alleged punch up was going to be toxic but you people wanted the Quebec vote! Now look at the mess.

Butts: How are we going to get a second term when junior here keeps tripping over his dick, we have to have the Quebec votes. 

Telford: Oh oh, I just got a text. There has been another press leak, this time on us secretly allowing refugees and immigrants to draw CPP without any contributions...

Butts: It just goes from bad to worse

Answer:
Sexual-explicit