TASK DEFINITION: In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence can be inferred from the statement. Incorrect choices change the meaning in important ways or have details that are not mentioned in the statement. Indicate your answer as 1,2, or 3 corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.
PROBLEM: Statement: Another refreshing feature of Goodman's storytelling is that, unlike other members of fundamentalist sects one might find in novels, her characters don't chafe at their restrictions, or not too much. Choices:  1. Goodman's characters failing to question their restrictions is frustrating to read. 2. The fact that Goodman's characters in fundamental sects don't generally feel too restricted by the rules of their sects is a unique aspect of Goodman's storytelling. 3. The common novel story line that has members of fundamentalist sects yearning for freedom has become overused and stale.

SOLUTION: 2

PROBLEM: Statement: The double sepulchre of Jean sans Peur and his wife, Marguerite de Baviyre, is also lavishly sculpted, although more stylized. Choices:  1. Jean sans Peur's wife was Marguerite de Baviyre. 2. Jean sans Peur was only married once. 3. Jean sans Peur was never married to anyone.

SOLUTION: 1

PROBLEM: Statement: The ones that were killed in the crib would have turned neo-Clintonism into a full-scale self-parody. Choices:  1. Babies killed in their crib would only help the idea of neo-Clintonism. 2. Babies that got killed in their crib would turn the idea into a self-parody. 3. Neo-Clintonism would be absurd if the ones killed in their cribs turned out to be 100% white.

SOLUTION:
2