In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: insult and non-insult. Insult is any lanugage or act that is disrespectful or scornfully abusive.

Input: Consider Input: Comment: Good comments, Monica.
 
I imagine you'll agree that the discussion about who might be the first gay saint presupposes a fairly modern paradigm about sexual orientation. The norm throughout most of history has been for a somewhat flexible line. It's doubtful that Paul -- or most of the sacred authors, for that matter -- even thought in terms of  'straightness' or 'gayness,' but rather in terms of what they perceived as moral or immoral actions.

Regarding RC bishops, it seems that these days intellectual curiosity is not high on the list of qualifications. There are plenty of intellectually curious priests (well, some anyway), but they tend to get weeded out well before they rise to the level of the episcopacy, sad to say.

Output: Non-insult


Input: Consider Input: Comment: All methods of reducing dental decay should be employed - It's something to consider.

Explain how, when water containing 0.7 mg/l fluoride ions has never been considered a medication, fluoridation opponents can claim the water treatment method is forced medication.  It would be like me claiming disinfection is forced poisoning and demanding that it be stopped.  Chlorine gas is a known chemical weapon, bleach is a strong poison that no one would want to drink, and studies on disinfection byproducts have shown they are poisonous at high exposure levels - would you want to drink a glass of chloroform?

Fluoridation opponents invent definitions to fit their agenda when there is absolutely no support for those claims.

Output: Non-insult


Input: Consider Input: Comment: Couric's a liar and unless her comments can be corroborated by non-politicized witnesses she should be ignored.


Output: Insult