We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Input: Consider Input: Sent1: Now that said, one has to wonder why people for gun control or anti gun types keep telling people that defend the right to bear arms that they could not win a fight.
 Sent2: Simple if gun haters want people defending the right to bear arms to be in militias, why would you want the militias to have lesser weapons then the enemies they are defending against?

Output: Not similar


Input: Consider Input: Sent1: The anti gun/gun control advocate way at dealing with deaths caused by guns is to limit the right to bear arms.
 Sent2: Talking about the right to bear arms with anti-gun/gun control advocates is like talking about civil rights with racist.

Output: Not similar


Input: Consider Input: Sent1: I do see the sense in some measures such as restricting access to guns for people who have committed violent crimes.
 Sent2: Some studies used against gun have been ones showing that over 50% of homicides in the US are committed with guns, while in countries with gun bans or very strict gun control have a lower amount of gun homicides.


Output: Not similar