In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Example Input: Comment: Sounds like you like your pussy grabbed huh moron?
Example Output: Sexual-explicit

Example Input: Comment: This just underlines the problem: most Americans are idiots. At this point, we can pretty much call the US a failed experiment in democracy. For democracy to work, you need to have  an informed, critically-thinking electorate. Americans, as a group, are far from meeting that ideal. How they expect to have a good relationship with the world when their President pursues policies that beggar other countries is a mystery. Why Americans don't understand how much poorer they will be if they cut off free trade is another mystery. Many Americans don't understand that automation has cost far more jobs than any trade deal. But it is easier for them to blame the outside world than see the problems in themselves.
Example Output: Non-sexual-explicit

Example Input: Comment: While I agree that the Proud Boys are by definition misogynistic, it's not the thing to go after in this case. I would question their sincerity in sticking up for Cornwallis as I am absolutely certain that they are not serious, and if they were just how crazy does that make them. They say that they're not anti- this, that and the other thing but their actions at the Cornwallis statue clearly reveal that they don't like Canada's indigenous peoples. The rubbish about sticking up for Cornwallis is just a smokescreen, they got what they wanted by turning the event sour and by getting their moment of infamy in the press. Clearly, the Royal Canadian Navy is not on their side and they'll be lucky if they're not court martialled.
Example Output:
Non-sexual-explicit