Given a document, generate a short title of the document. The title should convey the main idea/event/topic about which the document is being written. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

[EX Q]: During the war  no one was more emblematic of the changing power dynamics than  Farah Baker   a 16-year old Palestinian girl who came to international attention for  her  social media updates about life in Gaza.  Baker  was not tied to any political group and  her  perspective on the war was a personal one. Yet  her  social media presence catapulted  her  to global attention and told the Palestinian story to the world in a way that resonated emotionally. It also empowered  Baker  as a political actor  something that  she  had never expected and that could never have occurred in any previous conflict.
During the war  no one was more emblematic of the changing power dynamics than  Farah Baker   a 16-year old Palestinian girl who came to international attention for  her  social media updates about life in Gaza.
Normally  a young teenage girl living under aerial bombardment would have been considered a bystander  at best  or a victim  at worst. But thanks to  her  Twitter feed  where  she  shared both  her  fears as well as  her  attempts to maintain normal life amid the war   Farah  became an important part of the Palestinian effort to sway global opinion on the conflict.
“At only sixteen   Farah  understood  even if only instinctively  the importance of social media in wartime  especially to a perpetual underdog like the Palestinians ” Patrikarikos wrote. “She understood the power that it gave to a single individual and to networks of individuals  power that previously would have been impossible.”
In her own small way  with her tweets and updates during the war   Farah Baker  had played a role in shifting the narrative and forcing the world to grapple with the Palestinian narrative of the conflict.
“I don’t have the ability to carry a weapon and I would never kill anyone  so my only weapon was to broadcast the truth and to let people know what was happening here ”  Baker  told Patrikarakos in an interview at  her  Gaza home. “I was more effective than I ever imagined  because of the amount of followers I got and because so many people told me I had changed their minds [about the war] and opened their eyes.”
[EX A]: How Social Media Is Leveling the Playing Field Between Governments Militants and Ordinary People

[EX Q]: Comedian Louis C.K.’s trailer for  his  new film “I Love You  Daddy” has generated controversy online due to the movie’s theme and its timing following the sexual misconduct allegations against Hollywood producer Harvey Weinstein.
Moretz and Malkovich begin dating which horrifies  C.K.  due to her age.
“She’s a minor!”  C.K.  is seen yelling to Malkovich in the trailer.
Slate called the trailer “icky” while Esquire wrote  “Now is not the time for this  Louis C.K.  movie.”
“It’s honestly a bit shocking to see how tone deaf  Louis C.K.  is in 2017 because  he  was once a comedian ahead of the curve in so many ways ” one social media user tweeted.
“That uncomfortable moment when you start to discover that  Louis C.K.  is slowly becoming Woody Allen ” another Twitter user wrote.
 C.K.  told The Hollywood Reporter last month  “It’s just a f--king movie. We’re depicting oxygen-rich people who live in these beautiful apartments and offices saying whatever they want. Folks say s--t to each other. You can’t think about the audience when you’re making the thing. If you do  you’re not giving them something that came out of your gut. You’ll be making something that you’re like  ‘Is this OK for you?’ And they say  ‘Yes  thank you.’ Mark Twain said something like  ‘You can’t say no one can eat steak just because the baby doesn’t have teeth yet.'”
Like Weinstein  the comedian has also been accused of sexual misconduct by female comedians. Gawker published an article two years ago detailing  the allegations against Louis C.K.  while writer and comedian Tig Notaro told the Daily Beast in August that the comedian needed to “handle  the allegations .”
“I made my move on the red carpet of the awards show ” Koester wrote. “One by one  I would ask a conveyor belt of comedians  all men  'How do you feel about the Cosby allegations?' They would all  invariably  claim to be disgusted by the man's misdeeds. I would then follow up with 'How do you feel about the Louis C.K. allegations?' They would all  invariably  claim ignorance.”
[EX A]: Louis C.K.'s movie trailer spurs controversy amid Harvey Weinstein scandal

[EX Q]: Jonathan Swift  we need you more than ever.
This week marks the 350th birthday of the brilliant Irish writer  born Nov. 30  1667. That we know of  Swift  at all is one of the sweetest fortunes of literary history.  His  father died of syphilis before Jonathan was born. A wet nurse whisked him to England for three years. He depended on the generosity of an uncle. He was almost killed by a mail bomb. But despite those precarious turns   Swift  became a poet  a priest  a political operator and  of course  the greatest satirist in the English language.
The longevity of  Swift ’s work is a testament to its potency because no genre fades as quickly: Satires are the cut flowers of literature. Time wilts their wit  fading their bright colors like old political cartoons that poke fun at fat cats we no longer recognize. (Voltaire adored Samuel Butler’s 1663 mock heroic poem “Hudibras ” but try reading it now without footnotes.)
[Jonathan Swift: Not (entirely) the misanthrope you thought you knew]
W.B. Yeats knew what he was talking about when he said of  Swift   “Imitate him if you dare.”
Consider the remarkable persistence of “A Modest Proposal ” published anonymously in 1729.  Swift ’s ironic phrase is such a hardy part of our language that it’s easy to forget how unlikely it is that we’d still be referring to a 3 000-word political pamphlet almost 300 years later. Originally titled “A Modest Proposal for Preventing the Children of Poor People From Being a Burden to Their Parents or Country  and for Making Them Beneficial to the Public ” the essay burns with rage at a privileged class willing to ignore and rationalize human suffering. Although the plight of starving Irishmen may be unimaginable to us today  the centuries have done nothing to mute  Swift ’s savage indignation.  He  still sounds as timely as last night’s “Daily Show.”
If you haven’t read “A Modest Proposal” since high school  look it up again and be astounded. Speaking in the voice of a perfectly reasonable bureaucrat   Swift  begins by describing the piteous state of beggars and their children “all in rags  and importuning every passenger for an alms.” In response to this “deplorable state ”  he  announces a solution  “having no other motive than the publick good of my country  by advancing our trade  providing for infants  relieving the poor  and giving some pleasure to the rich”:
Much of Swift’s essay is taken up with various statistics and logistical explanations  a hellacious spreadsheet of infant flesh to lay out the case for utilizing 100 000 children nursed to approximately 28 pounds each. In those well-modulated sentences   Swift  washes individuals and their pain away. As John Stubbs writes in his recent biography   Swift  possessed an “unequalled capacity to endow a ludicrous line of argument with an air of steadfast reason.” The bloody solution of “A Modest Proposal” is easy to laugh off as a bit of grotesque hyperbole  but the real horror of the essay remains its bland  bureaucratic tone — the same sterile language of accounting that justified American slavery  the Holocaust or any scheme that slices human lives into the columns of a ledger.
If politicians haven’t changed their menu much in 300 years  the rest of us still face the same risk of indigestion. Remember that “Gulliver’s Travels” ends with the intrepid narrator isolated and disgusted. Orwell assumed that Gulliver reflected his creator’s morose character and claimed that  Swift  suffered from a “general hatred of humanity” stoked by a perverse obsession with mankind’s sins and weaknesses. Stubbs argues that the image of  Swift  as a “misanthropic monster” is not entirely fair  but Gulliver’s fate is instructive  nonetheless.
Now that we’re all strident critics trading the day’s outrages across Twitter and the dining room table  how are we to avoid being sickened by our own bitter indignation? The bile in a satirist’s mind must be balanced with hope  or the whole enterprise is doomed. Surely   Swift  wouldn’t have bothered to poke fun at cruelty  incompetence and hypocrisy unless  he  believed  on some level  that such scalding exposure could awaken a better nature.
On  his  350th birthday  it’s good to remember that despair is the satirist’s temptation and the citizen’s poison.
[EX A]:
Ghosthunters grabbers and grifters: What would Jonathan Swift say of our times?