Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.

Example Input: And how does corporate welfare we are all paying for, in a global economy suit your careful sensibility? The narrow focus of one aspect of manipulation of so much that is interconnected, shows how you could move elsewhere, yet still manage to complain about indigenous land ownership in perpetuity.

They had all that before the European industrial revolution allowed them to steal with impunity. And treaty upon treaty was supposed to allow them to recover from that loss; yet the indigenous peoples were repeatedly put into a smaller holding cell & given less rations than previously.

You are on stolen property & yet would seek to stand 'your' ground there? ;)
Example Output: No

Example Input: Cross posted from the DNM.

On January 4th, 2012, a student at Weber State University in Utah was carrying a handgun in his pocket when it accidentally discharged, wounding him in the leg. On November 9th, 2012, an employee at the University of Denver dental school was showing her handgun to some colleagues when she accidentally fired it while trying to unjam it. On May 3rd, 2013, a student at the University of Southern Mississippi accidentally shot himself while sitting in a car on campus.
On September 3rd, 2014, a professor at Idaho State University accidentally shot himself in the foot in the middle of class. Idaho had allowed campus carry only two months before.
Example Output: Yes

Example Input: Here's what's going to happen - Republicans will lose the White House. That's a given. If you haven't yet accepted that fact then kudos to the echo-chamber that continues to feed you false information. They're certainly succeeding in doing their job.

Republicans will also lose the senate. Democrats only need five seats to retake the majority. Given that Trump or Cruz is a disaster for the down ticket races PLUS Republican senators refusing to do their job, Democrats will have an easy time taking those five seats. They may actually succeed in getting a filibuster-proof 60-seat majority.

When Republicans lose the White House and the senate, their plan is to give Garland the vote. That is not going to happen. Obama will withdraw the nomination and allow the Dem victor choose the next SCOTUS nominee. 

The next SCOTUS nominee will be someone Murkowski despises (IF she wins her own re-election). 

That's called karma. She shouldn't have played games.
Example Output:
No