In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

[Q]: Comment: Being rich and famous doesn't make you smart, capable, or even a nice person.  We should all know that now.
[A]: Non-obscene


[Q]: Comment: What? Jeff Sessions isn't good. He's pretty much evil.
[A]: Non-obscene


[Q]: Comment: Let's be fair on Val Hoyle's contributions. Emily's List supports progressive women. How much is the unfair attack ad by Humane Society Legislative Fund costing, and benefitting Brad Avakian? She actually fought the NRA and suffered greatly - and they dare say she's in the NRA pocket?? Why isn't that ad here? If it were, you'd have to admit Michael Bloomberg gave her a big chunk of change because she opposes the NRA, and possibly in direct response to this garbage from the Humane Society Legislative Fund, that also gave to people like David Vitter. NO to Brad Avakian's underhanded supporters.
[A]:
Non-obscene