We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Ex Input:
Sent1: Also once you become an agent of the government you stop having right, you have authorities and you're controlled by the people the Constitution is supposed to protect you against.
 Sent2: I think laws stating that you should not be allowed to carry guns onto airplanes or into schools are examples of common sense gun control laws meant to protect people.

Ex Output:
Not similar


Ex Input:
Sent1: Do you think that private companies should be able to restrict freedom of speech as well as any other parts of the constitution?
 Sent2: The medium of 'free speech' has changed, but that does not affect that free speech should still exist - just as with the other constitutional points (with a few exceptions, if you believe Bush).

Ex Output:
Not similar


Ex Input:
Sent1: We should protect gun laws because of crazy people who go out of control with them and guns these days are getting more advanced and easier to get
 Sent2: If guns are more advanced now, then that's all the more reason we should have the right to defend ourselves against them, not less.

Ex Output:

Not similar