instruction:
The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.
question:
Context: 'Haha well we'll be seeing a lot of each other then. Is water your number one or two priority?' 'Water is my second priority item. I am sure we can work out a fair deal. What do you propose?' 'We'll be able to make it close to equal. Let's do 2 foods for one of us, 2 waters and 2 firewood for the other person. I'll take either.'
Utterance: 'Ok that works for me 🙂 2 food for me, 2 firewood and 1 water. Then you get 2 water and 1 food and 1 firewood. Does that work?'
answer:
No


question:
Context: 'Me too! It will be great to finally get out of town for a few days. I mostly need more firewood to keep the wife nice and toasty. How about you?' 'oh it turns out I need firewood too!🙂' 'Ha what a surprise! ;-) What do you need second most?'
Utterance: 'I need food to feed all my friends that are coming up. how about you?'
answer:
Yes


question:
Context: 'Yes. Can you help me to give some extra fodd?' 'I am willing to give you the good, though it would help us--we have a large group.  I really would like to take the water.  We are camping out in a primitive campsite with no running water.' 'Ya sure. '
Utterance: 'Sorry for the type--I meant 'food' not 'good'.🙂'
answer:

No