We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Ex Input:
If I had my way, we'd have no death penalty except for rare cases, and have time in prison be cruel and usual with regular torture.

Ex Output:
Valid


Ex Input:
We don't have 100% certainty in 100% of the cases so there forever remains a risk that an innocent person will be killed for anothers crime.

Ex Output:
Valid


Ex Input:
It makes anybody that believes in the DP a cold blooded killer.

Ex Output:

Valid