In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Q: Comment: how about this point....some children who were 'sexually abused' did not have a look of horror on their face at the time, but rather not only initiated it, but had a big smile on their face as their lives were being 'destroyed'.

A: Sexual-explicit
****
Q: Comment: Finishing up here, the underlying problem I see is that either through direct coordination with the Clinton campaign (thank you Wikileaks), or through a desire to drive up ratings/profits, the mainstream media has been taking many of Trump's words out of context and intentionally stoking fear and racism across party lines for the past year. At the same time, any stories about HRC's actual racism, like having the young woman removed by security at a press conference when she dared to ask about the "super predator" comment from the 90s, were completely buried. Now that Trump has been elected, the media is going into overdrive to drive people apart. Quick to blame Trump, blame some absurd Russian conspiracy theory, cast al his supporters as racist and ignorant, but dont talk about real policy issues. Dont talk about widespread police abuse, make it about race. Dont talk about widespread poverty, make it about race. Dont talk about lost jobs across the board, make it about race.

A: Non-sexual-explicit
****
Q: Comment: I know, I just don't get it. All she did was:

"She went to a state where one in five people lives in poverty and many children don't know where their next meal is coming from. Instead of helping in some way, she chose to brag about her outlandishly expensive clothes. It's more than tone-deaf, it's deplorable," Miller said.

A:
Non-sexual-explicit
****