In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

[EX Q]: Comment: What a joy to read the Demo Liberals squawk about Republican spoils being passed out.  Spoils distribution has been going on since the USA was founded.  Would you expect Trump to appoint Doug Chin to be US Attorney for Hawaii?  These liberal local yokels will always be crying their nonsensical songs until January 2025, when term limits law requires a new POTUS.  By then, maybe Paul Ryan may be elected to succeed DJT.  Ha! Ha! Ha!  ALOHA AND IMUA..
[EX A]: Non-obscene

[EX Q]: Comment: Ummm NO!  But nice way to frame your answer so no matter what we say against this utter bullshit..you can shake your head in phoney support like "its ok we know you cant say cuz your man is holding you down".  That in itself is enough to not vote for your corrupt ass because basically your saying im weak!  Ide like to get these weak hands around your neck if that says anything.
[EX A]: Obscene

[EX Q]: Comment: The fish rot begins in the head. As a citizen participant at City Hall, I have observed Caldwell's methodical retaliation against Mr. Chuck Totto take place. Natalie Iwasa is another citizen witness. 

It's the classic method of ousting an independent Totto from the Ethics Commission office - - Tighten the purse string; rein in the  decision-making abilities of Director Totto;  gag Totto from talking to the public; make Totto time-clock every 6 minutes; and stack enough votes to force Totto out.

Caldwell then  dishonestly turns around to say "he doesn't know" what's going on or disperses disingenuous statements that insult the public intelligence or play his political games:  "Caldwell refused to be interviewed for this report, saying through his campaign spokeswoman that he was too busy to discuss city ethics before the Aug. 13 primary." 

Caldwell unequivocally DOES NOT deserve a second term. Caldwell has a very bad record of retaliation, bullying and abusing his public office.
[EX A]:
Non-obscene