We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

Input: Consider Input: It's also silly to argue that the Second Amendment only protects arms in common use.

Output: Valid


Input: Consider Input: I would imagine that in most cases where guns are stolen and not reported, the owner does not realize they have been stolen.

Output: Valid


Input: Consider Input: If you recall the argument for you was "more guns = less crime", The Donohue study rejects that idea as do I.


Output: Valid