In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.

[Q]: Comment: Furlong did lie. Let's not forget that. At first he denied being in BC during an earlier stint in Burns Lake, then he admitted it, downplaying the commission of almost 2 years of his life and his original start in Canada. While that doesn't mean he hid something, it does bring up the matter of deception and convenient forgetfulness.

That si why he has zero claim for libel or wrongful dismissal.

So let him get on with his life, but not as a trusted public speaker or figure. His showboating style (Evermet him? Lots of self-promotion in his personality) is something he paid a price for.
[A]: Disagree


[Q]: Comment: I agree no one should be "left by the wayside". Feminism does no such thing. Wente knee jerk reaction to anything "feminist" is most often misleading.
[A]: Disagree


[Q]: Comment: Perhaps Stewart Brian you could focus on the facts rather than mounting  a specious  ad hominem attack.
[A]:
Disagree