We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.
--------
Question: Australia's laws mandating that all guns be kept locked up, and the lack of the ability to claim self-defense when shooting a violent home invader, has made Australia a very dangerous place to live or visit.

Answer: Valid


Question: How can a people defend themselves from the government, unless they are able to maintain the same weapons as the government has?

Answer: Valid


Question: Do you think that private companies should be able to restrict freedom of speech as well as any other parts of the constitution?

Answer:
Valid