In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

[EX Q]: Comment: "It does seem a little hypocritical for Dogwood to be complaining about Kinder Morgan playing a role in the B.C. election through its donations to the BC Liberals, when it is receiving money from the United States to fight for causes aligned with interests there. "
In one case, foreign interests donate money to advocacy groups.
In the other, foreign interests donate money to a political party whose members currently form the provincial government. 
Not even remotely equivalent, Gary, and tf. hardly hypocritical of Dogwood to complain about it.
[EX A]: Non-obscene

[EX Q]: Comment: For doing nothing but welcoming the barbarians through the gate, Merkel is finished and will be remembered as one of Germany's most hated leaders....
[EX A]: Non-obscene

[EX Q]: Comment: Denver is a shit hole city it stinks it smells and you can thank the FUCKING scum shit holes from California.the FUCKING scum libtards they Fuck up everything they touch !!! Can't drive thru Denver with out smelling that crap it stinks and a skunk smells better and that stupid FUCKING  dickenlooper who thinks he is smart hebone dumb POS the helped Fuck IP Colorado just like iscumbo ducked up America
[EX A]:
Obscene