TASK DEFINITION: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.
PROBLEM: How can a people defend themselves from the government, unless they are able to maintain the same weapons as the government has?

SOLUTION: Valid

PROBLEM: Another point that isn't taken in consideration in the stats that I've seen is that guns are used in self-defense but it still goes down as "gun violence."

SOLUTION: Valid

PROBLEM: Even though he says he's neither in the collective or individual column he is clearly in the collective column simply by suggesting that the right to bear arms requires you to be in the militia (which SCOTUS disagrees with.)

SOLUTION:
Valid