We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

Input: Consider Input: Please show me what law prevents amending the constitution to repeal another amendment.

Output: Valid


Input: Consider Input: Does anyone need to tell us what our rights are when they were written to be understood by the simple man and plainly enumerated as rights belonging to the people and without which the Constitution would have never been ratified.

Output: Valid


Input: Consider Input: Like I said before, claiming that semi-automatic rifles get a lower level of constitutional protection than handguns because they are less useful for self defense seems absurd from historical point of view.


Output: Valid