In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

[Q]: Sentence: The sun was covered by a thick cloud all morning, but luckily, by the time the picnic started, it was gone.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the cloud because it was so thick that it obscured the sun. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
[A]: Correct


[Q]: Sentence: Lily spoke to Donna, breaking her silence.
 Reason: The 'her' refers to lily because it is likely to be the first time Lily is in a relationship with a female character in the series. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
[A]: Wrong


[Q]: Sentence: I put the butterfly wing on the table and it broke.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the butterfly wing because it is in the same position as the butterfly wing, which I had taken it off of. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
[A]:
Wrong