In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.
--------
Question: Comment: In other words, you had no idea that, proportional to population, cops shoot white folks about half as often as they shoot black folks.

So you can't play this game. You don't have the ante.

Answer: Non-obscene


Question: Comment: I don't appreciate either the writing (such as it is) or the sentiment.  The writing style is incoherent because these selfish individuals don't have any arguments to rationalize their presumed "privilege" to place wildlife and other human users of our rapidly fragmenting wilderness at risk.

Typical of the entitlement mentality crowd, it's all about THEM. Fact is once a bear has been aggravated into attacking a person, it's almost always destroyed because of the entirely rational concern the bear will subsequently be less afraid of humans after attacking one and coming away unscathed (which is usually the case). And this nose-ringed nitwit's solution? She'll wear a "don't kill the bear" tattoo! Yay.  THAT oughtta help.

"Never underestimate the power of human stupidity."--R. A. Heinlein

Answer: Non-obscene


Question: Comment: And the truth will set you free...  The world has changed when we shifted from common truths to disparate ideologies. America is a great country based on ideals for what made us great...freedom, respect, hard work, mobility might make the list. But now, to make America great we need more pollution, greater inequity, more blame, fewer immigrants...this really is the same neo-fascist world of Linbergh except for little d's love of Russia rather than Germany. And the merchants of doubt have a strong alliance with his supporters as he questioned those who would point out the lies and mischaracterizations of the world portrayed by he and his minions. Of course his latest speech was classic--1/3 lies, 1/3 third ingnorance, and 1/3 suggesting we do what is being done.  Of course we know that Bush failed to get an agreement to leave groups and created the timeline for withdrawal, and we also know that there are other security risks besides ISIL.

Answer:
Non-obscene