In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

Input: Consider Input: Comment: Milo is an openly gay man purports to be a Catholic and does part of his hate routine in drag.  The Cardinal Newman Foundation should have itself in vapors if such a character comes to a Catholic university.   Milo might corrupt the students and turn them gay.

Output: Identity-attack


Input: Consider Input: Comment: who gives a shit what tis arrogant jew thinks about anything.  What good did he do  for NYC?

Output: Identity-attack


Input: Consider Input: Comment: Speaking of (most of you) hypocrites. I'm sure not one of you used a single derogatory label when referring to Bill and Hillary, or Barack and Michelle in the past 94 months, right. 

Why is it that you can freely exercise your First Amendment rights, yet Ms Patkotak is being vilified for doing the same. Get past a couple of words that you don't approve of, to hear the underlying message.

Personally, I prefer Heir Combaround....


Output: Non-identity-attack