In this task, you are given a passage which has a question and the context. You have to generate an answer to the question based on the information present in the context.
--------
Question: Context: Sufentanil is an intravenous opioid often used as a component of anesthesia during neurosurgical procedures. However, the effects of sufentanil on intracranial pressure in patients with diminished intracranial compliance are not well established, and remain controversial.', 'Ten patients with head trauma, in each of whom the trachea was intubated, were studied for the effects of sufentanil on intracranial pressure (ICP) and on cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP). In all patients, ICP monitoring was instituted before the study. Sedation was obtained using a propofol infusion, and paralysis was achieved with vecuronium. After obtaining control of ICP (between 15 and 25 mmHg) hemodynamic values and blood gas tensions (PaCO2 between 30 and 35 mmHg), the level of sedation was deepened with an intravenous injection of sufentanil (1 microgram/kg over 6 min), followed by an infusion of 0.005 microgram.kg-1min-1. Mean arterial pressure (MAP), ICP (fiberoptic intracranial pressure monitor), and end-tidal CO2 were continuously measured and recorded at 1-min intervals throughout the 30-min study period.', 'Sufentanil injection was associated with a statistically significant increase in ICP of 9 +/- 7 mmHg (+ 53%), which peaked at 5 min. Then ICP gradually decreased and returned to baseline after 15 min. This was accompanied by a significant decrease in MAP (24% decrease) and, thus, CPP (38% decrease). After 5 min, MAP and CPP gradually increased, but remained significantly decreased throughout the study.\Question: Does sufentanil increase intracranial pressure in patients with head trauma?

Answer: The results of the current study indicate that caution should be exercised in the administration of sufentanil bolus to patients with abnormal intracranial elastance, particularly if ICP is significantly increased.


Question: Context: To determine whether the number and location of positive surgical margins (PSMs) in radical prostatectomy (RP) surgical specimens affect biochemical recurrence (BCR) rates.', 'The locations of PSMs were recorded for 1308 consecutive men who underwent RP between October 2000 and December 2006. BCR was defined as three consecutive prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level rises with the peak level >or=0.15 ng/mL. Multivariate regression analyses were used to identify preoperative predictors of PSMs and BCR. The estimated 5-year risk of BCR was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method.', 'In all, 128 (9.8%) men had one or more PSMs. The mean body mass index, mean preoperative serum PSA level, the distributions of clinical stage and biopsy Gleason scores, and the presence or absence of biopsy perineural invasion were significantly different between men with or with no PSMs. In multivariate analysis, baseline serum PSA level, Gleason score and perineural invasion were independent preoperative predictors of PSMs. The 5-year actuarial BCR rates were dependent on the site of the PSM (P = 0.035) and not the number of PSMs (P = 0.18). The rank order of estimated 5-year BCR rates according to the site of PSMs were base > anterior > posterolateral > apex approximately posterior.\Question: Does site of positive surgical margins influence biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy?

Answer: About half of the men with PSMs in the RP surgical specimen in our prospective series did not develop BCR. The risk of BCR was dependent on the site and not the number of PSMs. Adjuvant therapy should be considered in cases with anterior and basilar PSMs due to the very high risk of BCR.


Question: Context: To determine the relationship between abnormalities in blood coagulation and prevalent or incident cardiovascular complications in Type 2 diabetes.', 'Prospective cohort study of 128 patients with Type 2 diabetes in whom blood samples were collected at baseline and after 1 year of follow-up. All cardiovascular complications at baseline and follow-up were recorded. Forty-three healthy, age-matched subjects served as a control group.', "Logistic analysis revealed an independent relationship between soluble tissue factor (TF) and microvascular disease [per pg mL(-1) TF: Exp(B) = 1.008; CI(95%)1.002-1.014], or neurogenic disease [Exp(B) = 1.006; CI(95%)1.001-1.011]. The highest levels of soluble TF were observed in patients with microvascular and neurogenic disease (P < 0.001). Patients with Type 2 diabetes having a soluble TF concentration >300 pg mL(-1) are at a 15-fold higher risk for the presence of microvascular disease and at a 10-fold higher risk for the presence of neurogenic disease compared with the patients with concentrations below 100 pg mL(-1). Soluble TF was correlated with tissue type plasminogen activator, von Willebrand factor antigen, systolic blood pressure and age. Levels of F1' + 2, D-dimer, FVIII activity, t-PA and vWFag were not different among patients with micro-, macro- or neurogenic complications compared with patients without those complications. Forty-eight new micro-, macro- and/or neurogenic complications were diagnosed after 1 year follow-up. With the exception of higher F1 + 2 levels after 1 year all other markers remained unchanged. A trend toward higher soluble TF levels was observed in patients with new microvascular events (P = 0.056).\Question: Is soluble tissue factor a candidate marker for progression of microvascular disease in patients with Type 2 diabetes?

Answer:
Soluble TF is associated with existing microvascular and neurogenic complications in patients with Type 2 diabetes and is a candidate marker for progression of microvascular disease.