We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

Input: Consider Input: The second amendment is not primarily there to protect our right to keep hunting weapons.

Output: Valid


Input: Consider Input: Still waiting for a report of an armed citizen or group of armed citizens being involved in something as egregarious as this incident that you cling to and pronounce as a reason to demolish the Second Amendment.

Output: Valid


Input: Consider Input: And if the ones we already have aren't being enforced just like all the other laws, why should we believe that new gun laws will be enforced better than their predecessors?


Output: Valid