Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.

As a Christian Constitutional Conservative I tried hard to get a man of principle nominated.  I gave money until it hurt.  Forced myself to make phone calls to strangers on the eve of primaries in multiple states.  As you pointed out Trump doesn't represent Christian values, Constitutional values, or Conservative values.  He was pushed hard by the DC establishment, the media, and low information nationalist voters.  I am very angry at these people for putting their selfish agenda ahead of the good of the country.  Since Senator Cruz dropped out, I feel like the election is already over and America is sentenced to another 4 years of darkness, deceit, and decline whether it is Clinton or Trump.  Both candidates are lying, self-serving, New York elite big-government progressives with little regard for rule of law, constitutional freedoms and the Christian values that America was founded on.  The only difference is one wears an R and the other wears a D.
No

Alaska's Mission of Mercy needs to enroll on the Pick, Click, Give site.  This is too important of a community service to let die.  Can't someone out there write state and federal grants?  After all, Tammi Wilson help write a $1 million grant for one of her former staffers and got away with it.  That grant money went into the former staffer's private business.
No

Not all sexual assaults are committed by rapists; sexual crimes are committed by sexual predators. Rapes are committed by rapists. Chocolate syrup is irrelevant.

Yes