We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

Example Input: They're claiming the right to keep and bear arms applies only to a person's house, not the rest of their property, like the front yard, back yard, porch or garage.
Example Output: Valid

Example Input: Australia, for example, hasn't had one single mass shooting since it passed stricter gun laws over ten years ago.
Example Output: Valid

Example Input: Gun laws and bans are put in place that only affect good law abiding free citizens.
Example Output:
Valid