In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence can be inferred from the statement. Incorrect choices change the meaning in important ways or have details that are not mentioned in the statement. Indicate your answer as 1,2, or 3 corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.

Statement: Participants raised questions about whether the SEC should reconsider the amount and targeting of its civil sanctions and more frequently use other types of remedies, such as criminal sanctions, to hold people accountable for wrongdoing. Choices:  1. Participants believe candles will be a great remedy for criminals. 2. Participants asked questions about different ways to hold criminals accountable for wrongdoing.  3. Participants asked many questions about the death penalty. 
2

Statement: but uh that's right i'm not yeah outside of of uh pro football i'm not too interested in other games uh other sports anyway Choices:  1. I would only be interested in attending a game if it was a pro football game. 2. I'm not really interested in any sport other than pro football. 3. I like all sports except pro football.
2

Statement: uh it's a social programs without the corresponding responsibility i guess is Choices:  1. Social programs have nothing to do with this. 2. This is the key to dismantling the welfare state. 3. Social programs with no accountability.

3