In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

Input: Consider Input: Sentence: James asked Robert for a favor but he refused.
 Reason: The 'he' refers to robert because the favor was not answered. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

Output: Correct


Input: Consider Input: Sentence: Frank was upset with Tom because the toaster he had bought from him didn't work.
 Reason: The 'he' refers to frank because he is the only one who can explain the whole situation to Tom. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

Output: Wrong


Input: Consider Input: Sentence: In the storm, the tree fell down and crashed through the roof of my  house. Now, I have to get it repaired.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the roof because of the debris that fell on to it, but I also know that it is a reference to the. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 


Output: Wrong