In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Example Input: Comment: The AG1000 are now made in China. It is the LAST thing I want here.

And no, it is not a FAST or even gen IV reactor. It still suffers the same issues as the other gen III plants and should be built.

Instead, we have nuscale that is about to do a factory here in America, and put the reactor in NW Utah. 
Thorcon isa GREAT concept that has a proven thorium design and yet these idiots in Congress and now Trump's admin ignore.
Example Output: Non-obscene

Example Input: Comment: I'd like to share a comment written in response to the article "Clarity beyond clericalism: Bishop Long at the Royal Commission" published in the Australian on-line journal "Eureka Street." The article elicited this response from one reader, who referred to Catholic schools:

"If there were a significant risk of abuse, then enrolments would have fallen off dramatically. They haven't... so I conclude this is a witch-hunt...and not a realistic assessment of any widespread problem."

To describe Australia's Royal Commission into Institutional Child Sexual Abuse as an unrealistic "witch-hunt" addressing a manufactured problem sounds bizarre to me.  However, this commentator is not alone; there are others.

Those of us who believe Church reform is sine qua non need to be talking to these folks.  Conversation can be a slow process, but if there is no meeting of minds, no willingness to listen, we're dead in the water.
Example Output: Non-obscene

Example Input: Comment: When sanity is normalized it is the innocent who suffer most.  
When a mad man fires arrows, whether one of fifty-nine, the ultimate victims are not only those on whom they land, but those who gave him the bow and those who tried to disarm him.
"Told you so" is too late.
Example Output:
Non-obscene