Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.

Q: I had no idea there were turns!  I was poor and am semi educated, do I get a shot too? Please elect Elizabeth Warren first though. Actually HC flip flopped on both "trade agreements' not that it matters really. It is pretty laughable to assume that one should have an opportunity to become president because, um you want to. I wanted to be in NASA, even received some books from them. Apparently if you want to go on a NASA mission you have to either really good at math (nope) or be a test pilot ( um no on that one). Not really but this is the tone of  maturity of this article which I honestly thought was intended as humor and probably is. It is really is hard to tell on the internet sometimes. Either way, this won't get posted and I have probably insulted this person on some level depending on how you view this post although that was not really the intention, more so due to the   WW kiss our ass and agree policy :)

A: Yes
****
Q: The 10' smoking ban from public-used doorways is not enough.  Why should us non-smokers have to hold our breath to keep from inhaling unwanted, nasty cigarette smoke from non-courteous smokers who won't move far enough away?

A: No
****
Q: Yeah right.

It's small business, but yet the pro-dopers throw out tax incomes numbers that cannot be generated by anything by big business.

It's either one or the other.

A:
Yes
****