In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence can be inferred from the statement. Incorrect choices change the meaning in important ways or have details that are not mentioned in the statement. Indicate your answer as 1,2, or 3 corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.

[EX Q]: Statement: Neither Shakespeare (who alludes to the incident only in passing) nor history offers any justification for this gross violation of the laws of  Was there, as it was later claimed, some sudden movement on the part of French cavalry which lead Henry to fear an attack from the rear? Choices:  1. Henry was afraid of an attack. 2. Henry was afraid of an attack by the French. 3. Henry was not afraid of anything.
[EX A]: 1

[EX Q]: Statement: With his hands free, the rest was easy. Choices:  1. It was easy to break out of the cell, with his hands not free. 2. With his hands cut loose, the rest was a piece of cake. 3. With his hands still tied behind his back, everything else was impossible.
[EX A]: 2

[EX Q]: Statement: Accordingly, the number of dollars involved in worksharing is in the billions and the effects on mailers and the economy are quite large. Choices:  1. I have invested billions of dollars in worksharing. 2. The worksharing initiative is good for both parties. 3. I don't give money to worksharing.
[EX A]:
1