Given a document, an entity and its sentiment towards the entity, verify if it is the correct sentiment towards the entity. Answer should be yes or no. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

Example Input: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Guzman is Positive . A US judge on Wednesday postponed until September the trial in New York of notorious Mexican drug lord Joaquin "El Chapo" Guzman.
On Monday  Cogan had delayed the latest pre-trial hearing from January 19 to February 15  after  Guzman 's lawyer demanded more time to review several hundred thousand pages of documents in the case.
 Guzman  has been held in solitary confinement in New York since being extradited to the United States a year ago.
Accused of running the Sinaloa cartel   he  is facing 17 charges  and if convicted   he  is likely to spend the rest of  his  life in a maximum security US prison.
Example Output: no

Example Input: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity David Clarke is Positive . It's not enough to tell people that if they see something  they should say something  as often  people do not know what to watch for and report   former Milwaukee County Sheriff David Clarke  said Tuesday.
"There are a lot of people  350 million people in the United States  " Clarke  told Fox News' "Fox & Friends" program  while commenting about the deadly Las Vegas concert shooting. "They are not all known to law enforcement  so where I would start is doing a better job of engaging the public to help us out."
 Clarke  described Paddock Tuesday at the "needle in the haystack reference that you hear in homeland security enterprise and environment  and at times like this  the call to report troubled people starts over.
"We don't tell people specifically  you know  what to do  what to look for " said  Clarke . "I have been in law enforcement for nearly 40 years. I'm suspicious about everything."
 Clarke  said  he  has no doubt that as the investigation unfolds  there will be details that are now obvious in hindsight.
"We [should] do a better job of engaging the public  say here are the sort of things you need to look for and an ongoing campaign to do that " said  Clarke . "We spent a lot of money to see something  say something campaign. I wonder what the results are."
News broke Monday that Paddock's father had been on the FBI's Most Wanted List back in the 1960s  and  Clarke  said it will take a behavioral scientist to unwrap the shooter and  his  motives.
"We saw it in Orlando " said  Clarke . "We saw it in San Bernardino. We saw it a Fort Hood. After a while you look and what you hear over and over again is like some of the people's closest neighbors and friends saying 'hey  he seemed like a normal guy to me.' Oftentimes not."
 Clarke  said  he  expects Paddock's girlfriend  Marilou Danley  who was out of the country at the time of the shooting  will shed some light on his motives.
Example Output: yes

Example Input: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Andrew Weissmann is Negative . Iâve made no secret of my belief that Robert Mueller has created more of a hit squad than an investigatory team. Iâve never had it explained to my satisfaction why  in a nation awash in lawyers  that Mueller has assembled a team which consists  in its majority  Democrat donors and partisans. Primary among those is Muellerâs deputy   a guy named Andrew Weissman .  Weissman  is a civil service employee in the upper ranks of Department of Justice.  He  was at Hillary Clintonâs âvictoryâ party on the night of November 8  2016.  He  praised Sally Yates for refusing to do her duty under the Constitution and defend President Trumpâs travel executive order in court.
 Weissman  also has a history of being willing to prosecute people on scant evidence and bullsh** legal theories  letting them rot in jail as their appeals run their course  then seeing the freed but ruined professionally and financially.
A senior Justice Department prosecutor in Robert Muellerâs Special Counsel office held a meeting with Associated Press journalists last spring to discuss an investigation into Paul Manafortâs financial record  a day before the wire service published a major expose disclosing alleged money laundering made by the former and now embattled Trump campaign chairman.  Federal prosecutor Andrew Weissmann  now a senior attorney in the special counselâs office   met with AP journalists on April 11 after reporters informed  him  of their own investigation into Manafortâs dealings with Ukrainian officials. The reporters had reached out to Weissman on a different story earlier in the year and it was during that conversation  that the AP team told  Weissmann  of their investigation into Manafort  stated the sources. The AP published the explosive expose on April 12  a day after their meeting with  Weissmann . According to sources familiar with the meeting  the reporters had promised to share documents and other information gleaned from the own investigation with the Justice Department.
Most of this is utter bullsh** as Mueller wasnât appointed until May 17. BUT AP reporters donât meet with the head of Justiceâs Criminal Fraud Section for funsies. And a senior official doesnât take a meeting on the day before a major story runs for sh**s and grins. It doesnât work that way. AP obviously had information they wanted corroborated by Justice.  Weissman  didnât have to meet with them but  he  did. Now you have to ask yourself  why? According to the stories there was no open investigation into Manafort. So what could  he  possibly contribute that a press officer couldnât. Perhaps the AP  animated by civic spirit  decided to just give  Weissman  all  their  source material. Perhaps  they  flew there on broomsticks  too. Iâd rate both options just as likely.
Then you have to ask why  Weissman  made the jump to Muellerâs team? Did  him  having APâs source material represent  his  buy-in to get on a high profile investigation that could offer  him  the satisfaction of a bit of payback after sitting in the âvictory celebration â shell-shocked and dumbfounded  as the election was called for Donald Trump?
And you saw  Weissman  try to get Manafortâs bond revoked for editing an op-ed.
Weissmanâs history of legalized thuggery  his obvious and egregious partisanship  his collaboration with AP on their investigative work on Paul Manafort  and the abusive way  Weissman  has gone after Manafort all reeks of a personal animus. One hopes that eventually there will be enough heat on Rosenstein that heâll remember who the boss is and impose some type of discipline on Mueller posse. But Iâm not counting on it.
Example Output:
yes