In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.
--------
Question: Comment: Black are pathetic garbage worldwide!  See Africa!

Answer: Identity-attack


Question: Comment: Sorry, I consider a woman loose if she sleeps around a lot with different partners.  She seems to be concentrating more or less on one partner at a time.  Don't see anything wrong with that.  By the way did you wait until marriage before you had sex?  Just curious. 

Perhaps that is wrong with so called conservatives.  :-)
They haven't kept up with the times.  No wonder they tend to be so cranky.

Answer: Non-identity-attack


Question: Comment: Sir, you labour under a misapprehension.
Fact: I site CCTV footage, and state that it cannot be held inferior to so called eye witness accounts
Fact: I quote eyewitness accounts precisely to show how unreliable they are, NOT to support my arguments. This is because depending on what "media source" or account you read, the versions are startlingly different.

As a non SA living here, I took particular pains to read accounts from both sides and watch the full footage before drawing my conclusion, perhaps thinking that I could be more objective as I lack historical context. Here's what I found:
"Fact": The black girl complained three times previously go her mum she was being bullied by the white. Mum banned her from the play area but she snuck back and hit the white child. Yet now I also hear, long after that initial "fact" was common knowledge, another "fact", ie the white child complained three times previously.
"Fact": At no point did the child's mother desvribe the "8 year old boy"

Answer:
Identity-attack