Categorize the comment on the basis of obscenity. If the comment is obscene output Yes, otherwise output No.

Ex Input:
From reading the story, perhaps.  The law also says no speeding and everyone must stop at stop signs, but few people obey those laws either and those have actual safety consequences to other people. There are laws against littering but few care about that, if the state of Anchorage tells us anything.   People break laws all the time and I don't think there's a single person whose horse is so high they can criticize others for ignoring minor, pointless laws. There are plenty of dogs who behave just fine off leash and I've no problem with that.  Crappy dogs should not be off leash, or even out in public, but well-behaved dogs don't cause problems on leash or off.

Ex Output:
No


Ex Input:
I'm probably a non-conformist on this thread - I don't oppose ethical wolf hunting as such, though I am thoroughly disgusted by the State's wolf "culling" operations.
However, this wolf was taken along after the pelt would have been completely past 'prime'; and I seriously doubt the hunter has any intentions of consuming wolf meat.  So the killing was a wasteful use of a State's resource that would have been much more beneficial alive.
And I don't think it particularly wise to allow the taking of wolves over bait for the same reason I object to the practice for bear:  Wolves are just as capable of becoming habituated as bears.

Ex Output:
No


Ex Input:
Why would you no longer need to dredge when port is finished? Doesn't silt continue to come in on tide fluctuations?  Sounds like $290 million dollars of BS. Let cargo companies help pay for it and upkeep. They make billions on shipping cargo here and we pay for all upkeep on docks? Stupid. Their ships. Their repairs and upgrades. Simple!  Must be Juneau's idea of free market!

Ex Output:

No