instruction:
In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.
question:
Comment: Here we go again.  

The problem with Milo is exactly the same as the problem with Thomas Sowell, which is likely to become the problem with Camille Paglia:  In the authoritarian world of identity politics, your politics are owned by your group identity.

Milo is Libertarian and openly homosexual (as is Camille Paglia).  His real sin is his honesty.  Make no mistake, statutory rape is rape regardless of consent by the victim, because the victim simply is not old enough to consent.  Milo had his first (homo)sexual encounter when he was 13 or 14 with a Catholic priest .  Thirteen or fourteen is too young to have sex -- homosexual or otherwise -- but they're doing it anyway.  Milo's politically unforgivable transgression was to explain that he was a willing participant and to describe the personal importance of the experience.

His account made me uncomfortable because it forced me to confront realities outside of my personal experience.  That's one of the things good journalism does,
answer:
Sexual-explicit


question:
Comment: The GOP doesn't act on their values vs the left that doesn't even pretend to have any values. That's not a very tough call to make Ryan. Hillary Clinton will be indicted that much has become clear and crazy Bernie da Bomber wasn't even a successful senator...and values? No one ran from his values faster than Bernie. But lets start with the crazy part:

He wrote in the 1970s that the country was close to experiencing a nuclear apocalypse or "death by poison gas." He claimed cervical cancer was caused by women not experiencing enough orgasms

When he launched his campaign in May, this economic illiterate blamed the abundance of consumer goods for child hunger

Don’t forget how much women love being raped because Bernie hasn’t.
answer:
Sexual-explicit


question:
Comment: What is this nonsense about "attacking the province " ? Obviously Couillard has taken a page from Trudeau's book, as he referred to Boeing's actions as attacking us. Bombardier is a private company who receives both federal and provincial money, supposedly to help them make planes etc. One would not be remiss in suggesting that Bombardier bills itself as a maker of planes and railway cars, but is actually in the business of getting government subsidies to create jobs. Quebec is one of those provinces who had a great deal to say against the oil sands, with no regard for the jobs in Alberta. But now that their pet project , Bombardier is under attack, they feel outraged and the PM is happy to join in. The oil sands turns a profit, while Bombardier after 40 some years continues to bleed tax payer dollars and still politicians run to their defence. If anyone is being arrogant, it would be Couillard and Trudeau , in their continued support of a losing proposition for the sake of votes.
answer:

Non-sexual-explicit