In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

[Q]: Comment: So basically Doug is saying that the Christians who run the west with their War against Drugs, War against Sex, Sin , freedom of speech and even men are just as radical as the Muslims in the east with their intolerant attitude toward freedom of speech, gays, and women?
[A]: Identity-attack


[Q]: Comment: Are you kidding me. Trans gender bathroom bill, westboro, god hates fags, attempting to pint gays as pedophiles, painting gays as the cause of the aids epidemic, and constantly judging everyone through a very negative lens has been the religious rights mode of attack.

Then you dare come on here and again attack people that call out intolerance. It is not intolerance to point out hate, and your side peddles in hate of everything they didn't like.

Your side has spent years shouting down and name calling anyone that doesn't agree, then you come here and blame the other side. Par for the course, I guess.

Party of Personal Responsibility or is it Party of Her Emails now?
[A]: Identity-attack


[Q]: Comment: ". . . the Federal Transit Administration must approve the plan for financing . . . "  City council must also approve it.  Maybe the SA didn't mention it because it's a slam dunk.
[A]:
Non-identity-attack