Given a passage with a question and an answer to that question, classify if the answer actually answers the question into 'yes' or 'no'. Output 'yes' if the answer answers the question and output 'no' if the answer does not answer the question.

Q: Question: Does [ Edaravone protect hearing from acute acoustic trauma in guinea pigs ]?
Answer: The level of ROS in cochlea were decreased significantly after intratympanic edaravone injection. The mechanism may due to its effective clearance of the ROS in cochlea.

A: yes
****
Q: Question: Is repeated sputum microscopy essential for monitoring tuberculosis treatment response?
Answer: The yield of a second on-the-spot sputum specimen is negligible, provided that the first smear is from an overnight specimen. From the data available, it is evident that repeated follow-up smears are not essential for documenting treatment outcome.

A: no
****
Q: Question: Does the evidence speak for itself : The role of research evidence in shaping policy change for the implementation of publicly funded syringe exchange programs in three US cities?
Answer: Typological applications of research evidence are useful for understanding policy change processes, but their efficacy falls short when sociopolitical factors complicate legislative processes. Advocates for harm reduction may benefit from understanding how to effectively integrate research evidence into policy change processes in ways that confront the myriad of factors that influence policy change.

A:
no
****