In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.
--------
Question: Comment: As you can see, the problem is that it fails to comply with Federal statute. No gender-based discrimination, buster. It obviously also flies in the face of the principles of our US Constitution.

40 U.S. Code § 122 - Prohibition on sex discrimination
(a)Prohibition.— With respect to a program or activity carried on or receiving federal assistance under this subtitle, an individual may not be excluded from participation, denied benefits, or otherwise discriminated against based on sex.

Answer: Non-obscene


Question: Comment: You are all of you so stupid. Where was the dog? The dog was on his owners property. The shooter broke the law, the shooter was not in danger. The shooter aimed at a sitting still dog. The dog had a shock collar that kept it inside the property. The shooter should be charged with destruction of property, harassment, and unlawful discharge of a weapon in city limits. Throw the GOD DAMN BOOK AT HIM!

Answer: Obscene


Question: Comment: Once again, we have words from a pope, pointing out that the "sins" wee by "some of her members," and the church seeks forgiveness.  All too sadly however, those words once again, ring hollow, for they are spoken against a backdrop of not addressing the enablers.  The case of Francis bothers me in some ways more than his two predecessors, for the man has made bigger gestures, and offered dibs and dabs of hope, only to let it melt away.  That Commission that was to do so much, and would most certainly speak to accountability, is reduced to providing "guidelines" for bishops and countries.  Can it be that there a bishops left in the world who still don't know that this stuff is bad, that it's soul killing, and evil?  The obvious question then must be why are they still bishops (or why were they EVER bishops?)

So much hope.  So many words.  So little action.

Answer:
Non-obscene