We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Ex Input:
Sent1: Given the scrutiny of death penalty cases, it seems that we would be more likely to lock someone up for life in prison and never uncover their innocence than we are to execute an innocent person.
 Sent2: We should not even have the death penalty just on the off chance that we might execute somebody who is innocent.

Ex Output:
Not similar


Ex Input:
Sent1: I used to be for the death penalty, however two things made me question my position.
 Sent2: I think the death penalty should only be used in extreme cases where the accused is, without a doubt, guilty.

Ex Output:
Not similar


Ex Input:
Sent1: This is why I'm aganist the penalty as punishment.
 Sent2: I'm pro-death penalty because there is no atonement for murder.

Ex Output:

Similar