Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.

[EX Q]: How on earth can they support someone so dishonest and untrustworthy as Trump?
[EX A]: No

[EX Q]: Peter, according to APOC records, Pete Kelly does not hold a job.  Kelly spends 3 months in Juneau, and the rest of the year unemployed.  This is the opposite of school teachers people like Kelly like to bash.  Teachers work 9 months, and get 3 off.  Kelly, and others like Coghill, "work" 3 months, and get 9 months off.  Kelly and Coghill collect almost $100 grand for their 12 weeks of "work".

Lazy, uneducated people like this must be replaced for Alaska to have any chance.
[EX A]: No

[EX Q]: I as only one out of tens of thousands do NOT support their buying that monstrosity of opulent corruption when they are forcing the rest of the state to make deep deep cuts that is now and will permanently affect the state agencies negatively in keeping the state running.    
The legislators do NOT make the show run.......it is the individual agencies that keep it going.   The legislators only throw wrenches into everything make things worse every year.   
They obtained that upgrade to that building and the lease in a corrupted, illegal and underhanded way.    They deserve to be booted out on their rear ends ........without their automatic motion detecting trash can to do you know what in .
[EX A]:
Yes