In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

Example Input: Comment: Yes, white people who stick up for themselves are so terrible. I mean we should should just roll over and accept this new Liberalized world full of weakness and defeat in the name of tolerance.
Example Output: Identity-attack

Example Input: Comment: Oh, those 'naughty' BC Liberals! First, Christy shrugs and says, "The BC voters don't care corrupt we are.", then disappears until the whole thing blows over (she hopes). Then her deputy crime boss, Rich Coleman comes out and throws their donors under the bus. If that wasn't bad enough, Suzanne Anton, Attorney General, stands up in QP and throws their lobbyists under the bus.  Who's next?
Example Output: Non-identity-attack

Example Input: Comment: From the inane to the ridiculous. You never disappoint, Stewart. Not so much beside the point as unaware of the point. Please keep on posting. I need more things to make me laugh.
Example Output:
Non-identity-attack