In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

Q: Comment: We're Russians now, Hungryboy?
You must be an ignorant American--but we already knew that.

A: Identity-attack
****
Q: Comment: Such is the ways in which we have decided as a society as to how we we deal with misfits; those who march to the beat of another drum; those we can "put away" for not following the "norms" that have been established; those who are annoyingly bothersome; those who can't follow the rules; those with some find of deficiencies deemed difficult to handle, etc.  Do we consider these means to be the most effective and successful ways in dealing with these "problems"?  Sure doesn't seem like it, but, we seem to go on our merry way heading in this direction.  How come?

A: Non-identity-attack
****
Q: Comment: It's the leftwing of the Labour Party and the LibDems who are anti-Semitic in the UK. The term "Zio" is often used as an acceptable word for Jews living in the UK,; Corbyn's brother has done this. Labour are going after the Muslim vote.

Saunders has been preaching for years that Europe has nothing to fear from Islam; a religion openly hostile to Jews and Christians, as well as gays and women. 

Another article from Islam's useful idiot.

A:
Identity-attack
****