The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the vouch-fair strategy, otherwise output No. vouch-fair is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to call out fairness for personal benefit, either when acknowledging a fair deal or when the opponent offers a deal that benefits them. This can be through an explicit call out or can be implied.

Example Input: Context: 'Ok - you're not being reasonable at all.  If you're so incompetent at going camping, maybe you should stay home and I can take all the supplies. How's that for an excellent offer?  All for me and 0 for you.' 'I think it would be good to come to a compromise. If I take all of the water and have the 2 foods, you can take all of the firewood as you originally proposed. Yet, I will have a tough time learning how to survive on a camping trip.😡' 'Again, that's not a fair compromise....You get all of what we both we want and more of another item.  Let me state it to you clearly so you can understand.  I WILL NOT ACCEPT THAT OFFER.  There is no chance you are getting all the water now that I think about it.  I will offer I get 1 water, 2 firewood, and 2 food.  If you can't come up with a reasonable offer, I will just walk away and we both get nothing.  I will survive because I will have skills.'
Utterance: 'I think this is reasonable because you have a big family. I will accept 2 waters, 1 firewood, and 1 food. '
Example Output: Yes

Example Input: Context: 'Yes, can you live with two foods? ' 'I can. How about firewood? I would like 2 if possible.' 'Well there are only 3.'
Utterance: 'Of course. Since you're getting more water, I was hoping to get 2 firewood, and you could have the remaining 1. Would that work for you?'
Example Output: Yes

Example Input: Context: 'And I have plenty of food as I'm the only over eater of the group.' 'OK how about 2 firewoods me 2 foods me 1 firewood you 1 food 3 water' 'If I'm only getting 1 firewood let me have 1 extra food then. So you can have the 2 firewoods, plus 1 food. I'll get 1 firewood, 2 foods and 3 waters. You get the most important item so I'm thinking that's fair.'
Utterance: 'No in the end i will only be getting 3 items where you get 6 i think my way is more fair'
Example Output:
Yes