We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

[Q]: The non-repeat offenders are typically people who committed much smaller crimes that would never be worthy of the death penalty in the first place.
[A]: Valid


[Q]: it has been proven time and again prisons don't rehabilitate, keeping someone in prision for their entire life in prision is less human than the death penalty.
[A]: Valid


[Q]: So I'm completely up front about it, I am adamently opposed to the death penalty period.
[A]:
Valid