We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

Example Input: Gun control does nothing to make anyone safer or save lives.
Example Output: Valid

Example Input: I would imagine that in most cases where guns are stolen and not reported, the owner does not realize they have been stolen.
Example Output: Valid

Example Input: ...and you are right, there is no credibility to a "needs based exercise of the right to keep and bear arms".
Example Output:
Valid