Categorize the comment on the basis of severe toxicity. If the comment is severely toxic output Yes, otherwise output No.

Check the sponsors on the bill that would cut them loose.  Your "lefties" crap is unfounded.
Yes

I'll repeat from my previous comment the quote from Jim Furnish, former supervisor on the Siuslaw National Forest and former deputy chief of the U.S. Forest Service;"The federal government ceased using forest herbicides after notoriously losing a landmark lawsuit over human health issues associated with miscarriages and birth defects....there is no longer any doubt that they (herbicides) are harmful to humans and the environment...the outcome is instructive to today's protracted struggle to ensure human health in the face of corporate greed."  In my opinion after 20 years of observing many of our county commissioners I believe they work for the wealthy logging industry at the expense of the people and wildlife. If Jay were truly concerned about low income folks he would make laws to protect them from toxins which could result in expensive medical costs and lost wages due to illnesses. Public servants should serve the public, not big campaign donors.
No

For the U of O, 'history' apparently is the last 20 years, or so.

 One of the worst grades I received at the U of O was a class that met 9:00 am, Monday-Wednesday-Friday-Saturday!  It was "Physical Science Survey", and met the lower division science requirement for those of us too dumb or unprepared to take a 'real' science class to meet the requirement.  

I couldn't find my way to class on Saturdays.  (My job while going to school was a swing shift which ended at 1:00 am.)

Yes