instruction:
Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
question:
Brought to you by SEIU 503, AFSCME, and all those other union corporations who represent the teachers, State bureaucrats, police, firemen, county employees, city employees, and University of Oregon employees.  

You know, the people who will benefit by "increasing public employment by 17,700" while "Oregonians with incomes of less than $21,000 would pay an additional $372 a year under IP 28" to support  their greed. 

 And who are least able to pay when ",low-income Oregonians would be hit the hardest, and there would be no exemptions for essential purchases such as food, utilities and pharmaceuticals."
answer:
Yes


question:
This offering to Alaskans could sunset after 2 (two) years which should give ample time for distribution.   The State could continue selling 1 million acres per year for (4) four years thereafter to others elsewhere who want to invest or make Alaska their home.   Alaska would realize at average $2,500.00 per acre sale, amounting to 2.5 Billion in the first/second years; qualifying the use of the other half of the Permanent Fund earnings by Alaskans with the pass through.   Revenue over the next 4(four) years could, at minimum, generate a total of 12.5 BILLION or more for use to cover a portion of the States Operational Budget.
answer:
No


question:
Sorry, not gonna take that from you.  Folks in the melanistically-challenged section of the  bleachers dealt that deck, and now don't like being called on it when they try to deal from the bottom.

Would you like a little cheese with your whine?
answer:

Yes