In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Comment: You do realize I'm sure that HRC campaign has successfully used fear to control the loyal subjects of the dem. party. It really is sad to see just how easy these voters are manipulated. She has disdain for her supporters but they refuse to allow that into their narrow vision.  DT has a unsavory past with his words. HRC has a corrupted past. However her ardent supports find more fault with mere words then they do with actions because the actions were committed by a dem. Pitiful that we have come to this point. You know, Nixon had to resign due to his cover-up, how many more cover-ups is HRC involved in? But again, since she has a "D" behind her name the ignorant dem. voters will either ignore, or more likely,  condone the criminal. The good news, her day is coming where she will be held accountable, the bad news, if she is elected first we get that insane Kaine. WLTDO, question for you, do you think the puppets even bother to read the leaks? I don't, they haven't been told to.
Non-sexual-explicit

Comment: This article is somewhere between deceptive and fraudulent.
1)The first step in suing the state or any other entity is the FILING of the COMPLAINT and SERVING the defendant the COMPLAINT.  The state says they have not been served the complaint.  Therefore at this time no complaint has been filed.
The truth is, at best, is that the plaintiff is PREPARING to sue the state and I hardly find this to be any way news worthy!  Seriously WTF?
Non-sexual-explicit

Comment: When you have a witch in the Oval Office, let the hunt begin!

Non-sexual-explicit