Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.

Example Input: Yep. As I thought, you can't quite get your facts right.

And, your attempt to finesse the "boundaries" issue doesn't fool anyone. I've posted the full comments below.

What a funny concept! "Intellectual bullying." Is the definition: "using superior [intellectual] strength or influence to intimidate someone who is [intellectually] weaker, typically to force him or her to do what one wants."?

Well, let's see -- the council vote was 8-0 to use the W. 6th/7th Aves. alignment, if I recall. Must have been a result of "intellectual bullying."

For folks who don't know. LTD got caught with its pants down on the facts -- _most specifically the superior service benefits of running on W. 6th and 7th Aves._

Hopefully, you no longer have any role in transit planning because you haven't got a clue.
 
-- Paul
Example Output: No

Example Input: I've always believed that political candidates can rack in the bucks, but in the end the voters have the only say.  Uninformed voters can be easily hoodwinked.
Example Output: No

Example Input: Living comfortably while focusing on my band and screen printing guerrilla art while I work part-time at a bike store is an unassailable right.  

With the rising desirability of this area my SNAP benefits, SafeLink Wireless cellphone plan,  subsidized apartment rent and TriMet pass are just not cutting it anymore.

I demand an increase in these benefits so that I can afford to live comfortably in this desirable and increasingly expensive city.
Example Output:
No