In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: threat and non-threat. Threat is a statement that someone will be hurt or harmed, especially if the person does not do something in particular.

Comment: My comment on this story was simply:
Luke 19:27
It was censored for not meeting civility standards.
The verse reads:
But those enemies of mine who did not want me to be king over them--bring them here and kill them in front of me.'"
Threat

Comment: Of course the progressives here are 'praying' for Cardinal Pell to be convicted. Why?  Not because he might be guilty or innocent, that is immaterial. It because he is an orthodox Catholic bishop.  Orthodox Catholics in the Curia have been regularly cursed by Pope Francis who has gradually placed his heterodox cronies into high places in the Curia.
"I am the Pope."
Non-threat

Comment: Oh, nice try there Simona and Globe. Mr. Peterson is by my own humble estimation quite likely brilliant, and now he's getting some 'notoriety' as you say, and that's a bitter pill to swallow for the likes of you is it? The man resorted to posting an 'amateur' video when he felt vulnerable and cornered by what no doubt felt like a treacherous legion hell bent on dismantling or obliterating a foundation and structure of a society/civilization/state which he'd (like we all aspire to do consciously or not) spent a significant part of his lifetime coming to terms with and attempting to 'master.' And backed up as he felt by a notion of 'scientific reality' which delineates a binary of sexes for 99.9% of specialized cell organisms, and by his own and arguably objective truth - recognizing the inherent risks associated with a power structure that threatens to attempt to dictate the terms of your understanding of 'human rights,' whereas only a 'god' could do that - you're green with envy!

Non-threat