In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

Input: Consider Input: Sentence: The large ball crashed right through the table because it was made of styrofoam.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the table because A ball isn't going to crash through a table if it was the one made out of Styrofoam as oppose to the ball being the one. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

Output: Correct


Input: Consider Input: Sentence: Madonna fired her trainer because she couldn't stand her boyfriend.
 Reason: The 'her' refers to the trainer because madonna get angry because her boyfriend sleep with others. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

Output: Wrong


Input: Consider Input: Sentence: Everyone really loved the oatmeal cookies; only a few people liked the  chocolate chip cookies. Next time, we should make fewer of them .
 Reason: The 'them' refers to the chocolate chip cookies because You would need more oatmeal cookies not fewer. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 


Output: Correct