We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

Ex Input:
"We could even grant animals a right to bring suit without insisting that animals are persons, or that they are not property," Sunstein said on page 11 of Animal Rights: Current Debates and New Directions (2004).

Ex Output:
Invalid


Ex Input:
Would you really want a public with an armed force of unknown size, strength, mobilty, location, organizational structure and intention anywhere in your country?

Ex Output:
Valid


Ex Input:
So if criminals would be in favor of banning guns, does that mean it would be in the best interest of society?

Ex Output:

Valid