instruction:
We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gay Marriage) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gay marriage. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gay marriage.
question:
Some changes allowed different people to marry (blacks and whites, for example), while others expanded the rights of married people (like Federal tax breaks).
answer:
Valid


question:
And once they accomplish that special right, according to the American legal process, every other non traditional marriage interest will have a precedent setting case law in which to justify their own reason for having a non traditional marriage.
answer:
Valid


question:
The problem with saying that a right exists only if it is codified specifically in law is that the Supreme Court has on numerous occasions struck down laws that the Court says violate people's rights.
answer:

Valid