We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Ex Input:
Sent1: The fact remains that life in prison is cheaper than sentencing one to the death penalty.
 Sent2: Without the trials and appeals, death penalty cases would be much cheaper than confining inmates for the rest of their lives.

Ex Output:
Not similar


Ex Input:
Sent1: But why do you have to get rid of them by killing them.
 Sent2: I don't believe that they should because if you kill someone, they won't have the chance to either get rehabilitated nor will they have the chance to actually regret what they have done.

Ex Output:
Not similar


Ex Input:
Sent1: You do realize that if they do murder somebody while they are in prison, it will most likely be another prisoner, since the guards are armed?
 Sent2: Killing a person for them killing someone else ( I understand this is not necessarily the criteria for receiving the death penalty) makes you no better than the executed.

Ex Output:

Not similar