In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.
--------
Question: Comment: Hi, ignoramus, love to see you in an alley way and
beat you with a louieville slugger. This will come 
to pas and whites will lose. Why, because they still
haven't even figured out which are men and which
are women. Terrible a race that can't even figure out
that born with a penis is male and a vagina is female.
Thank the Great one whites won't survive 50 more
years.

Answer: Sexual-explicit


Question: Comment: While I agree with the basics of your thought (the Legislature failed us), to think the chief thief would not have vetoed the PFD is foolishness. That man wants our PFD, and nothing will stop him. The Legislature could have hacked the budget with a light saber, and Walker would have still capped our PFD.

Answer: Non-sexual-explicit


Question: Comment: When John Kelly told lies about her and refused to use Rep. Frederica Wilson’s name during his press conference and instead, referred to her as an “empty barrel,” he was accused of racism.


Some people said no way.  Not John Kelly.

This week John Kelly decided to prove those people wrong.


And he did so in spectacularly disgusting fashion.












During his interview with every wingnut's eternal wingnut vamp, Laura Ingraham, Kelly made statements that prove he is steeped in the white supremacist view of this country’s history.

The history that needs to be noted here is how this “Lost Cause” mentality was created and spread to the point that someone like John Kelly is still buying it 150 years later. That is all the proof we need that the racist divide is still firmly embedded in our country today.


In the end, these last couple of weeks have further enlightened us all about the reason John Kelly was chosen by Trump.

Answer:
Non-sexual-explicit