We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

[EX Q]: Sent1: Any further laws on the right to keep and bear arms by State, municipal or any other government is out the window.
 Sent2: Every person has a right to keep and bear arms for the defense of himself and the state.
[EX A]: Not similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: We don't have to choose between total regulation of guns or total denial of the problem of gun crime.
 Sent2: We have more crime than fully armed countries not because we don't have guns.
[EX A]: Not similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: Now that said, one has to wonder why people for gun control or anti gun types keep telling people that defend the right to bear arms that they could not win a fight.
 Sent2: Some gun control advocates try to say that the word ���people�۝ here refers to a collective body of people, (a state) meaning there is no personal right to keep and bear arms.
[EX A]:
Not similar