Given a document, an entity and its sentiment towards the entity, verify if it is the correct sentiment towards the entity. Answer should be yes or no. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].
--------
Question: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Tayyip Erdogan is Negative . ANKARA (Reuters) -  Turkish President Tayyip Erdogan  said on Tuesday  his  talks with U.S. President Donald Trump last week were the first occasion in a long time the two NATO allies were "on the same wavelength" and they would speak against this week.
"The telephone call which we had with Trump on Friday was the first in a long time in which we got on the same wavelength "  Erdogan  said in a speech to deputies from his ruling AK Party in parliament.
According to Turkey's foreign minister  Trump on Friday told  Erdogan  he had issued instructions that weapons should not be provided to the Syrian Kurdish YPG.
Speaking to reporters in parliament after his speech   Erdogan  said the Pentagon statement would be discussed at Turkey's National Security Council (MGK) meeting later on Tuesday.
 He  also said that Trump indicated that another call may happen this week.
"If  he  doesn't call  I'll call  " Erdogan  said.

Answer: no


Question: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Aly Raisman is Neutral . Olympic gold medalist Aly Raisman has stripped down for Sports Illustrated's Swimsuit issue.
The move comes after  Raisman  made headlines recently for presenting a powerful 13-minute testimony against Larry Nassar during which she directly told the former Olympic doctor  âYou are nothing."
âI would like to remind everyone that being a survivor is nothing to be ashamed of  and going through a hard time does not define you â  Raisman  said to SI Swim. âI hope that we can one day get to a point where everyone realizes that women do not have to be modest to be respected. We are free to draw confidence and happiness in our own way  and it is never for someone else to choose for us or to even judge us for that matter.â
âFor me  âIn Her Own Wordsâ serves as a reminder that we are all humans  we are all battling something  and it is OK to not be OK â  Raisman  said. âWe are not alone and we need each other.â
âYou lose a part of yourself when youâre abused â  Raisman  recently told People. âI lost a part of myself  and Iâm getting it back by speaking out.â

Answer: yes


Question: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Bill Clinton is Neutral . Devin Nunes' announcement came one week after The Hill published  a report on a "racketeering scheme ... designed to benefit former President Bill Clinton's charitable foundation during the time Secretary of State Hillary Clinton served on a government body that provided a favorable decision to Moscow ."
 The Hill's report  largely echoed those claims  alleging that Russian officials tried to "ingratiate themselves with the Clintons" by transferring "millions of dollars from Russia's nuclear industry to an American entity that had provided assistance to Bill Clinton's foundation."
The Iowa Republican sent a letter to Attorney General Jeff Sessions last Wednesday asking whether the Department of Justice was investigating the fact that  former President Bill Clinton  was paid for a speech around the time that the US government approved the Uranium One deal  and that Russians donated millions to the Clinton Foundation years before the uranium deal.
Trump used the uranium deal to try to undercut  Clinton  during the campaign and draw scrutiny away from  his  own potential Russia ties. He claimed in October 2016 that  Clinton  gave uranium to Russia "for a big payment " which The Washington Post later said was inaccurate.
Fact checkers more broadly have been quick to push back on characterizations of the uranium deal as a quid pro quo between  Clinton  and Russia  and PolitiFact found that the US produces such little uranium that the "concerns were out of proportion."
The Post's fact checker reported last year that although the State Department was one of several agencies that would have been able to approve the 2010 deal  "there is no evidence  Clinton  herself got involved in the deal personally  and it is highly questionable that this deal even rose to the level of the secretary of state."
"Theoretically  as Schweizer says   Clinton  could have intervened " The Post reported. "But even then  it ultimately would have been Obamaâs decision whether to suspend or block the deal."

Answer:
no