We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

[Q]: If you support the right to bear arms, ultimately you believe that a person should be allowed to kill somebody in self defense.
[A]: Invalid


[Q]: To take an example: the tax-code contains numerous loopholes that allow unscrupulous folks to take advantage of it and keep money that many argue they should be paying into the system.
[A]: Invalid


[Q]: 30 years of studies suggest that the death penalty is a general, or systemic, deterrent.
[A]:
Valid