In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.

Example Input: Comment: Has anyone thought to ask how this was handled by the minsters in the previous government?

Or perhaps Mr Chase and Mr Fife were completely incurious about this until just now. After all who needs context in these halcyon days of  innuendo and the drive by smear.

These ministers revealed their assets and their choices were approved by the ethics commissioner(a Harper appointee who was was known for years for her extreme leniency  members of the Harper government).
Example Output: Disagree

Example Input: Comment: Just in case you missed it...

“there should be no preferential access, or appearance of preferential access” in exchange for political donations"

Trudeau and his Liberals cannot be trusted.   He must resign.
Example Output: Agree

Example Input: Comment: Well said.  The ones who turned a blind eye to Alaska's impending financial crisis over the past decade or more by doing nothing to rein in spending - the Republican Imperial Majority - will be the ones to scream the loudest.  They have no courage or honor, unlike Gov. Walker.
Example Output:
Agree