In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.
--------
Question: Comment: I would be carrying more than a large knife if people were shooting at my home and animals, calling me a white nigger, threatening to shoot me, and showing up with a virtual lynch mob of ignorant people who are shouting and threatening to 'tape me up' and send me out of town. The leaders of Akiak have led their people to commit illegal actions before and what would stop them if they told these people to harm this man? I understand that kind of harassment is legal and accepted in Alaskan native villages apparently, but it's not right on a human or a Christian level ( which is apparently not their religion). Sooo he is  wearing a knife on his belt on a small farm in Alaska and that makes him a bad person? Hahaha. That's beautiful.

Answer: Identity-attack


Question: Comment: Are you kidding me. Trans gender bathroom bill, westboro, god hates fags, attempting to pint gays as pedophiles, painting gays as the cause of the aids epidemic, and constantly judging everyone through a very negative lens has been the religious rights mode of attack.

Then you dare come on here and again attack people that call out intolerance. It is not intolerance to point out hate, and your side peddles in hate of everything they didn't like.

Your side has spent years shouting down and name calling anyone that doesn't agree, then you come here and blame the other side. Par for the course, I guess.

Party of Personal Responsibility or is it Party of Her Emails now?

Answer: Identity-attack


Question: Comment: Like the frog in the water that is heating up. At first it enjoys it - then it kills the frog.

Answer:
Non-identity-attack