In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

Example Input: Comment: nobody else in the world would call any Hispanick "white".  Liberals know it makes Hispanicks feel proud to refer to them as "white" and Hillary Clinton as "non-Hispanick white".  But when you deport a Hispanick, they then claim we are doing it because we don't want "non whites in the USA".
Example Output: Identity-attack

Example Input: Comment: Very true.  Let's blame this on the gay, pedophile/ephebophile priests and the bishops who covered for them.
Example Output: Identity-attack

Example Input: Comment: Show me Christians alive today overseas who believe that mass murder and mass sexual assaults in the name of Jesus are called for, encouraged and acceptable and I'll support blocking them, too. Please don't drag some figure from the year 1272 AD, or something, into the picture to imply that "Christians commit mass murder in the name of Jesus". Such people are not alive today and are irrelevant. 

As vile as Bill Maher can be, he does have a terrific understanding of the nature of Islam and an exact understanding of the ushy-squisy "liberals" who foolishly believe that there's no connection between Islam and Islamic terror and the nonsense that Christianity and Christians "do it, too".
Example Output:
Identity-attack