We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Q: Sent1: States without the death penalty have fared BETTER in reducing their murder rates than states with the death penalty.
 Sent2: In the United States, states without the death penalty has consistently lower murder rates.

A: Similar
****
Q: Sent1: Only .06% of people who have killed kill again when they escape, are released, etc.
 Sent2: The government does not have the right to kill people.

A: Not similar
****
Q: Sent1: We should not even have the death penalty just on the off chance that we might execute somebody who is innocent.
 Sent2: By the same token, if we keep administering the death penalty while the system is broken, we will have a much greater risk of putting someone innocent to death.

A:
Similar
****