instruction:
In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.
question:
Comment: Another Muslim jerk, amazing how Alaska has changed in the past 30 yrs. or so, look all low lifes that are allowed to come here and comment murder, but that's okay. we have a house full of jerks sitting in Juneau allowing this to happen.
answer:
Identity-attack


question:
Comment: Do white students have the same power to take down black teachers who belittle them in class about white privilege? No. White students are expected to take the insults and shut the f++k up.
answer:
Identity-attack


question:
Comment: Absolutely absurd. " No one voted for the Daily Mail. But when that newspaper branded the three judges of the U.K. High Court late last year as “enemies of the people” for having the temerity to suggest that Parliament should have a say on when the U.K. left the EU, Britain really did start to resemble Germany in the 1930s."
Another attempt to invoke Nazi Germany. There was a referendum and it was democratic. What on earth does that have to do with the Daily Mail?

" A referendum is part – but only one part – of the democratic process. The extent to which the democratic process in its entirety was attacked by unelected tribunes of the people was one of the more alarming effects of the referendum campaign and its aftermath."
What is that about? A referendum is only part of the democratic process? Really what part other than voting is more important to invoke the will of the population. How on earth was the democratic process preserved through court order trumping the vote?
Absurd!
answer:

Non-identity-attack