We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

Example Input: Gun hater Sarah Brady like al gun hater blame the right to bear arms for the crimes committed with guns.
Example Output: Valid

Example Input: As to all of the other demands for more and more and more and more and more, gun control, then a never ending list loopholes on all that is proposed, see the last 300 iterations of this exact same thread.
Example Output: Valid

Example Input: Whether they were more armed before or after it makes no difference after Hitler and the Nazis came to power they used the registration to disarm all those who were not Nazis.
Example Output:
Valid