Given a paragraph about movies and a set of conversational questions and answers about the paragraph, say whether the passage contains sufficient information to answer the follow-up question. Say Yes if it is answerable; otherwise, say No. The paragraph has the prefix 'CONTEXT:'. Each conversation question has a prefix `Q:` followed by the answer prefix `A:`, and the follow-up question has a prefix `FOLLOWUP_Q:`.

Example Input: CONTEXT: I bet it had something to do with her consciousness never really disappearing. My interpretation is that, in the movie, bodies are mortal. They die. But a person's consciousness, their awareness and ability to interact with the physical universe, is timeless and is not tied to the mortal body they inhabit for a while. (That's just my guess. The movie was pretty trippy and didn't explain everything fully.)  <sep>  Q: What did Lucy mean by "We never really die"? A: I bet it had something to do with her consciousness never really disappearing  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: At the end of the movie Lucy told the officer "I am everywhere." What did she mean by that?
Example Output: No

Example Input: CONTEXT: This is a highly opinionated question because people will feel different about what is considered "end of origin story". I argue the whole movie is an origin story. It starts in the beginning of him being a surgeon, loosing his ability to operate, searching for solutions, the whole "superhero in training montage", climax where he finds out his true purpose and powers and ending in him being what is considered to be The Doctor Strange everybody knows. There is no cut in the movie where you could say: "Okay, NOW origin is over" because (again, highly opinionated), only at the end of the movie is the character fully developed and whole. Anything in between is just a half truth.  <sep>  Q: How much of Doctor Strange is origin story? A: the whole movie is an origin story  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: So, we learn about this character?
Example Output: No

Example Input: CONTEXT: I think you have misunderstood. The news report was about the (possible) resignation of the Prime Minister after a scandal. It had nothing to do with the investigation into the assassination or the bombing. The news report states that Steven Hunter-Dunn, the Director of the Security Service was under investigation for leaking the compromising material on the Prime Minister although this is probably a frame-up by Anne Sampson.  <sep>  Q: Why was this character mentioned in the News in the final moments of Bodyguard?
Example Output:
No