Categorize the comment on the basis of severe toxicity. If the comment is severely toxic output Yes, otherwise output No.

Q: The University owes the listeners of KWAX an explanation and an apology.  I cannot imagine KRVM or KLCC doing this - they are very transparent in this community. Despite their "ownership", the University of Oregon is acting like a bully in this case.  If you asked any of the listeners of KWAX if they ever expected this when they were contributing funds to support their "non-profit, listener supported" station, I'll bet the answer would be a resounding "no". Perhaps that is the UO plan - alienate the listeners. Even their responses to the reporter's questions were not transparent. I guess stations are no longer licensed to organizations as "public trustees." Those days are over.

A: No
****
Q: Government could start by closing the border with Mexico, where the majority of drugs come through. Then, instead of jailing dealers, we hang them and that includes the illegal aliens hiding in sanctuary cities. The only way to get results, is to stop voting for liberals, who are destroying this country. Liberals want open borders, knowing that drug dealers, human traffickers, diseased, ignorant, unlawful people are coming in. They spend more on illegals, then they do taking care of Americans. This all needs to stop! Our liberal President, is releasing known drug dealers, does not enforce laws, therefore we have right now, a President not doing his job.

A: Yes
****
Q: One of the most important things the rich want is exclusivity: the ability to restrict who can call themselves their neighbors.  Opposing development or fighting for the "character" of a neighborhood (when character means $500K+ homes) gives them that.

I think affordable housing advocates make a terrible mistake when they hold hands with nimbys.

A:
No
****