We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

Example Input: Who's going to file a lawsuit and allege that a person doesn't have a right to own a gun for any reason?
Example Output: Valid

Example Input: Let me ask you a question if I might: How do you explain the 2nd Amendment phrase ���the right of the people���?
Example Output: Valid

Example Input: Australia's laws mandating that all guns be kept locked up, and the lack of the ability to claim self-defense when shooting a violent home invader, has made Australia a very dangerous place to live or visit.
Example Output:
Valid