We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Example Input: VOC isn't a good debator since his points are meandering and generic.
Example Output: Invalid

Example Input: If law is flawed you don't ban death penalty, you fix the law.
Example Output: Valid

Example Input: 3 - Inequities in representation (meaning if you have the money you can afford a team of good lawyers so it's generally only the poor who see the chair)
Example Output:
Valid