In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

Ex Input:
Comment: In light of this slaughter by a Muslim, will gay bars be allowed to profile young male Arabs?

Ex Output:
Identity-attack


Ex Input:
Comment: As mentioned in the article, restaurants in particular and other businesses that have to use a lot of electricity are being slammed hard by the spiraling hydro rates. This Ontario Liberal government is either very stupid or else it has deliberately sert out to destroy the province.

Ex Output:
Non-identity-attack


Ex Input:
Comment: The l.aw is an ass! These judgements defy common sense and the so call justice which it is supposed to support. The Hell's Angels are guilty by any standard, and justice should be served. Slap the police for the technicality, but don't let the guilty off scot  free. Similarly the payment to Khadr. The $10.5 million was probably less than the judges might have awarded had the case gone to trial. But why should our legal system (or our society) allow such outrageous awards to the litigants and their lawyers defying credulity. So called human rights have gone too far, as have the judges and their righteous decisions.

Ex Output:

Non-identity-attack