We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

Input: Consider Input: Where is your true sympathy for folks like Suzanna Gratia Hupp who were disarmed by government edicts (unconstitutionally) while we arm our enemies of America and gun grabber/anti-Constitutionalists?

Output: Valid


Input: Consider Input: I think the gun grabbers have deep seated emotional problems that need dealing with and should be denied their Second Amendment rights.

Output: Valid


Input: Consider Input: I am, however, suprised that gun rights advocates use this case to defend the right to own guns, because the case seems to imply the opposite, as stated by Tim.


Output: Valid