We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

[EX Q]: Sent1: The problem with the death penalty is eventually someone will be sentenced to death when they are in fact guilty.
 Sent2: Only if they try to murder somebody after they are in prison do they deserve the death penalty?
[EX A]: Not similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: As it is today, when someone murderers another, the death penalty is considered, as it should be.
 Sent2: Essentially, you believe a fetus should be allowed to be killed simply for existing, while you protect the lives of people who have murdered other innocent people (as murder is generally what a person will get the death penalty for).
[EX A]: Not similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: Agreed, I just don't share their beliefs as to why the penalty should be stopped.
 Sent2: I will agree that the death penalty is too arbitrarily applied.
[EX A]:
Not similar