Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
--------
Question: It's just unconscionable that poor Olive's sexual nature is being published in a newspaper!  A suit against the R-G and Greenhill for intention infliction of emotional distress needs to be filed immediately!

Answer: Yes


Question: The issue of the 19 - 16 year old is, who's the aggressor and why? The 19 yo is college age, the girl a junior  (?) in high school. True love or nailing a virgin (maybe)? With teenage sex, the girl takes home the puppy.
As to did the old guy commit crimes? He denies it - of course. I imagine there's more evidence than an accusation.

Answer: Yes


Question: Apropos...

"Most of the events are public, but organizers are taking steps to make it difficult for media to cover them. This morning, PCC prepped the participants on how to deal with the media, warning them of "self-described journalists who file stories for blog sites." The school also informed them that media need to make arrangements with the PCC Public Relations Office in advance."

Orwell anticipated this too: In accordance with the principles of Doublethink, the 'PCC Public Relations Office' was called: "The Ministry of Truth", and equipped with a vascular system of document incinerators to be used on any documents which contradicted "the truth". (And a "Ministry of Justice" for use on their authors.)

Answer:
No