In this task, you are given a part of an article. Your task is to generate headline (title) for this text. Preferred headlines are under fifteen words.

Determining semantic textual similarity is a core research subject in natural language processing. Since vector-based models for sentence representation often use shallow information, capturing accurate semantics is difficult. By contrast, logical semantic representations capture deeper levels of sentence semantics, but their symbolic nature does not offer graded notions of textual similarity. We propose a method for determining semantic textual similarity by combining shallow features with features extracted from natural deduction proofs of bidirectional entailment relations between sentence pairs. For the natural deduction proofs, we use ccg2lambda, a higherorder automatic inference system, which converts Combinatory Categorial Grammar (CCG) derivation trees into semantic representations and conducts natural deduction proofs. Experiments show that our system was able to outperform other logicbased systems and that features derived from the proofs are effective for learning textual similarity.
Determining Semantic Textual Similarity using Natural Deduction Proofs

Résumé. Le crowdsourcing, un enjeu économique majeur, est le fait d’externaliser une tâche interne d’une entreprise vers le grand-public, la foule. C’est ainsi une forme de sous-traitance digitale destinée à toute personne susceptible de pouvoir réaliser la tâche demandée généralement rapide et non automatisable. L’évaluation de la qualité du travail des participants est cependant un problème majeur en crowdsourcing. En effet, les contributions doivent être contrôlées pour assurer l’efficacité et la pertinence d’une campagne. Plusieurs méthodes ont été proposées pour évaluer le niveau d’expertise des participants. Ce travail a la particularité de proposer une méthode de calcul de degrés d’expertise en présence de données dont l’ordre de classement est connu. Les degrés d’expertise sont ensuite considérés sur des données sans ordre pré-établi. Cette méthode fondée sur la théorie des fonctions de croyance tient compte des incertitudes des réponses et est évaluée sur des données réelles d’une campagne réalisée en 2016.
Une mesure d’expertise pour le crowdsourcing

The early classifications of the computational complexity of planning under various restrictions in STRIPS (Bylander) and SAS (Bäckström and Nebel) have influenced following research in planning in many ways. We go back and reanalyse their subclasses, but this time using the more modern tool of parameterized complexity analysis. This provides new results that together with the old results give a more detailed picture of the complexity landscape. We demonstrate separation results not possible with standard complexity theory, which contributes to explaining why certain cases of planning have seemed simpler in practice than theory has predicted. In particular, we show that certain restrictions of practical interest are tractable in the parameterized sense of the term, and that a simple heuristic is sufficient to make a well-known partial-order planner exploit this fact.

The Complexity of Planning Revisited – A Parameterized Analysis