Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.

All ivory trade should be banned

2015 25 walruses found dead near Cape Lisburne. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service determined the laughter was human caused. 1992 – A two year federal undercover operation interrupted one of the biggest wildlife slaughters in modern Alaska history; a grisly massacre of protected walruses providing ivory for the tourist trade. 2007 - Commentary by Paul Watson Founder and President of Sea Shepherd Conservation Society: Headless walrus are washing up on Alaskan beaches and narwhals are being pumped full of lead. Arctic wildlife is under assault in the quest for ivory and few dare question the losses for fear of being labeled racist. Additional stories, www.adn.com, search “ivory”. Alaska ivory poaching is on a par with African elephant ivory poaching.
Yes

If you have no integrity with the publicly stated beliefs of your religious denomination, that's between you and God. You are a private citizen, believe as you wish. 

But, your fellow Conservative Baptist Imago Dei church-member, Jules Bailey, has put the integrity of his beliefs (or, more accurately, lack of integrity, if I'm following his waffling correctly), up for public scrutiny. 

People who choose to become paid public figures, must expect to be scrutinized as such. And, it's a bit naïve for an Evangelical Christian to run for public office, in Portland, and not expect to be held accountable for the history of his chosen religion, particularly the past 30 years here in Portland (OCA, Oregon Family Council, etc.)
No

Lord knows running a city isn't a technical specialist, it's a professional bull&^%$er.

Yes