TASK DEFINITION: Given a document, an entity and its sentiment towards the entity, verify if it is the correct sentiment towards the entity. Answer should be yes or no. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].
PROBLEM: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Mayim Bialik is Neutral . Actress Mayim Bialik  says  she 's "truly sorry for causing so much pain" with  her  New York Times opinion piece that critics suggested put blame on women who've accused movie mogul Harvey Weinstein of sexual assault and sexual harassment.
 Bialik  wrote in the piece published Friday that  she  makes choices to be "self-protecting and wise " like dressing modestly and not acting flirtatiously.  She  later added that nothing "excuses men for assaulting or abusing women" and women should be able to wear whatever they want and act however they want.
 Bialik  addressed the backlash in a Facebook Live interview with the Times on Monday  saying  she  regrets it "became what it became."
 She  said Wednesday on Twitter that "what you wear and how you behave does not provide any protection from assault."

SOLUTION: yes

PROBLEM: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Pope Francis Letter is Negative . Well  it’s now happened.  The great scandal of the modern Catholic Church  —  its  tolerance for clergy who abuse children  and  its  laxity when dealing with bishops who themselves tolerated or enabled priest-abusers — now touches directly on  the pope himself .
 It ’s worth laying out the timeline clearly. In 2015  Pope Francis appointed Juan Barros Madrid to the bishopric of Osorno  Chile. The appointment was met with local protests  among Catholics and non-Catholics who believed that Barros was implicated in the crimes of child sexual abuse committed by his friend Father Fernando Karadima  a prominent Chilean churchman who habitually kissed and fondled boys. In the days after the installation of Barros at Osono  Pope Francis told an archbishop that there was “no objective reason at all” to oppose the appointment. The Vatican’s own department governing these matters  the Congregation for Bishops  released a statement saying they had “carefully examined the prelate’s candidature and did not find objective reasons to preclude the appointment.”
In the months following the appointment   Pope Francis  became extremely dismissive of complaints. “Osorno suffers  yes  for silliness ”  the pope  said of the outrage in the media. “Think with your head  and do not be carried away by the noses of the leftists  who are the ones who put this thing together ” he added.
A few weeks ago   Pope Francis ’s visit to Chile was marked by protests  and  the pope  continued  his  extremely brusque dismissal. “The day I see proof against Bishop Barros  then I will talk ” the pontiff said. “There is not a single piece of evidence against  him . It is all slander. Is that clear?”  Francis  said that no victims had come forward to  him . It was apparently this statement that caused Cardinal Sean O’Malley of Boston to scramble down to Chile and meet with the pope. After O’Malley’s intervention  presumably  the pope issued a half-apology  but repeated that the accusations against Barros were “slander” before adding  “I’m convinced he’s innocent.”
And now the news drops. In the time between the pope’s appointment of Barros and his commentary about protesters being carried away by leftists  members of the Vatican’s own Commission for the Protection of Minors gathered to discuss the appointment. They had a representative hand-deliver a letter to Pope Francis  from Carlos Cruz. The letter alleged  in lurid detail  that Barros had personally witnessed the abuse of Cruz at Karadima’s hands. Members of the commission photographed the hand-off of the letter to  the pope   to reassure Cruz that they were doing everything possible to make his cry for justice heard.
The facts as we know them leave us with a few interpretations. 1)  Pope Francis  simply never read the letter  ignoring this extraordinary intervention by the Vatican’s own commission on a matter of public controversy for  his  pontificate. 2)  Francis  read the letter but forgot about it  reverting to  his  original understanding of the case. 3)  Francis  read the letter  but stuck to  his  decision for Barros  committing unintentional or intentional deceptions about the state of  his  knowledge of the accusations. 4)  He  read the letter  but either doubted the accusations in it  or at least found them so unimpressive that  he  did not decide to follow up on them.
The first explanation would mean that  Francis  was culpably ignorant. The second that  he  may lack the mental or moral faculties to competently govern the Catholic Church. The third that  he  is too stubborn or vain to change course in the face of evidence. And the last that  he  has little trust or faith in the Commission on the Protection of Minors to pass on credible counsel to  him . Perhaps more reporting or disclosure will change our understanding  but none of these are satisfactory.

SOLUTION: no

PROBLEM: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Floyd Little is Neutral . On the day Floyd Little the football player was to receive assurance that he would live forever  Floyd Douglas Little  the man born on the Fourth of July  picked at his breakfast.
 The Broncos' first star with national appeal  Little had to wait 30 years after he was eligible for election to become the franchise's third player inducted into the Pro Football Hall of Fame on Saturday at Fawcett Field  the high school home field of Broncos head coach Josh McDaniels.
 Halfway through his two-egg omelet Saturday morning  Little got a call from McDaniels  who was kicking from inside his mother's womb when Little took his final handoff in 1975.
 The story goes that Little saved the Broncos franchise. A college sensation at Syracuse  Little became the Broncos' first  first-round draft pick to snub the National Football League and sign with Denver's struggling American Football League franchise. The excitement of Little's arrival  coupled with a nonprofit group that funded the expansion of Bears Stadium to what became Mile High Stadium in 1968  scuttled relocation plans and kept the team in Denver.
 As members of the new Hall class were waiting in a holding room for ESPN broadcaster Chris Berman to stop talking Friday  Little was filled with calm and peace. And a little feistiness.
 Joining him among the senior players who were elected was Dick LeBeau  the former Detroit Lions defensive back who is now the Pittsburgh Steelers defensive coordinator. LeBeau has taken on a protective  never-let-them-read-you persona that is typical of longtime NFL coaches. But Little poked away at LeBeau's guard.
 LeBeau couldn't help smiling at Little's playfulness.

SOLUTION:
no