We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Input: Consider Input: Sent1: You are pulling the same XXXX Doc did in thinking that because I don't think more guns equals less crime that I automatically must think it means MORE crime and that gun control laws are effective and needed.
 Sent2: So I think gun control on the magnitude you want would effect it, how could it not?

Output: Not similar


Input: Consider Input: Sent1: So you have to read the 2nd amendment as a whole.
 Sent2: If you repealed the 2nd amendment or any "incorporated" amendment than that amendment would no longer be law thus not "incorporated" (obviously since there is nothing to incorporate).

Output: Not similar


Input: Consider Input: Sent1: The logic of less guns in law abiding citizens hands means less gun crime is clearly insane.
 Sent2: This should be a clear indicator that legal ownership of guns in no way has increased potential criminality for law abiding citizens.


Output: Not similar