The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.

Example Input: Context: 'I meant I would give you my firewood, what would you trade in return?' 'Oh sorry for the confusion. 😮 In that case, thank you for the generosity! 🙂 How about if I have 3 firewood, 1 food, and 1 water?' 'I can do that for 3 food and 3 water?'
Utterance: 'I think we're close. Let's shake hands on this: 3 firewood, 1 food for me, and then 2 food and 3 water for you. I'll make sure your food packages have extra doggy treats! 🙂 Is that a deal?'
Example Output: No

Example Input: Context: 'Hello!' 'Hello! Yay, we get to camp!' 'Heck yes! I am excited. How about you?'
Utterance: 'I can't wait 🙂 Let's talk about these supplies. I've got hungry mouths to feed, Can I take the food and you can have half the firewood and all the water?'
Example Output: Yes

Example Input: Context: 'I need more food and water, you see I am diabetic, I need to eat many small meals' '😡 I can let the firewood and water lax if you provide us food.' 'let me have two food and three parts of water, I can let you have all the firewood and one fpart food'
Utterance: 'We do have a fire to start, but we are very hungry. Diabetics can eat less food because of the small meals. Don't lie to me.'
Example Output:
Yes