In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

Ex Input:
Sentence: Joe's uncle can still beat him at tennis, even though he is 30 years older.
 Reason: The 'he' refers to joe's uncle because he is the former head of the NBA's Dallas Mavericks and is currently the head coach of the Dallas. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

Ex Output:
Wrong


Ex Input:
Sentence: Jim signaled the barman and gestured toward his empty glass
 Reason: The 'his' refers to jim because he was a very 'in' character. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

Ex Output:
Wrong


Ex Input:
Sentence: Frank felt crushed when his longtime rival Bill revealed that he was the winner of the competition.
 Reason: The 'he' refers to bill because Frank was upset. So you assume Bill, his rival, won. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

Ex Output:

Correct