In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Comment: Damn, I just renewed my passport for 10 years.
Obscene

Comment: Yes, Comrade! Of course a PROGRESSIVE Income Tax where the sucessful minority pays all of the tax.

Why bother, why don't we just kill all the rich and take all of their money (just kidding). After all, that worked out so very well for the Russian peasants, didn't it?
Non-obscene

Comment: No Tri, you are missing a very important point about this kind of behavior.  Immediately after the fact a priest pedophile can seem to meet your criteria because they feel guilt after the release of the pent up energy.  That remorse may be their immediate feeling, but it may not hold any water three weeks down the road.  Unless there really is some magical component to Confession that changes a pedophile enough to stop the behavior, Confession is not going to solve any problems. That magic is abscent in more cases than not.  At that point it may behoove Catholicism to look to therapists who deal with this issue.  Keiran Tapsell's Canonical solution has a great deal of merit.  Pope Francis should implement it.

Non-obscene