In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

Q: Comment: As you well know, Shore, because you like me have taken advantage of it, there are no "civil comments" criteria or screening process at the National Post.   And when mentally deranged characters like "Claude" ramp up the rhetoric with absolutely disgusting and obscene and unfounded libels about Harper or others, there is a tendency for others including me to shoot back.

Unlike yourself stalking me around multi-forums (an unhealthy obsession if ever there was one and frankly kind of creepy), I don't stalk you around and make copies of your posts.  Therefore, I can't entertain the folks here with some of your most outrageous and bogus blather from the far out Liberal side of the political divide.

Tell me, Shore, are you a paid agent of the Liberal Party or an old school chum with a secret crush on Trudeau or simply a pain in the derriere?

Inquiring minds want to know.

OK, on second thought they don't ... you are a nonentity with the shallowness of a birdbath for an anorexic sparrow.

A: Non-identity-attack
****
Q: Comment: Yes, I agree!  Stop selling houses and condos to (non-white) foreigners!  We should only sell houses and condos to (white) Canadians with anglo last names who have been here for decades.  Enough is enough!  We don't want (non-white) immigrants destroying our communities!  Think of the (white) children who will have to grow up in apartments surrounded by (non-white) immigrants!

The horror!

A: Identity-attack
****
Q: Comment: What a crock of nonsense.
Please provide a rational explanation with a sober statistical analysis as to why .05 makes us safer than a .08 limit.
The majority of court cases where those who are charged with negligence causing injury or death occur when the driver is well over 08.
Please provide a scientifically credible case that lowering the limit to .05 or less actually makes a difference to road safety comparable to tightening up standards on existing sober drivers...

A:
Non-identity-attack
****