Given a document and an entity the task is to select the author's sentiment towards the entity. Sentiments can be Positive, Neutral and Negative. Select Positive if the article expresses a positive view towards the given entity or praises its quality or skills. Select Neutral if the document expresses no clear view towards the entity or has equal amounts of positive and negative statements or expressing some fact/quote by someone else. Select Negative if the article expresses a negative view towards like harsh remarks, criticizing entities action/decision etc. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

What is the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Erie ? (Reuters) - A storm that has dumped more than 65 inches (165 cms) of snow this week on  Erie   Pennsylvania  is expected to slightly taper off on Wednesday after leaving drifts that buried cars  paralyzed the area and made the county declare an emergency.
But the respite for  Erie   a city of about 100 000 in northwest Pennsylvania on the shores of Lake Erie  is expected to be short-lived  with a fresh round of winter storms coming Thursday night predicted to bring as much as 10 inches more snow  forecasters said.
A general view of 1925 State Street after the record snowfall in  Erie   Pennsylvania  U.S.  December 26  2017 in this picture obtained from social media. Courtesy of Instagram @BLJEFFERYS /via REUTERS
The winter blast in  Erie  was caused by cold Arctic air moving over the lake  which had relatively mild water temperatures  forecasters said.
The storm broke a 59-year-old record for a two-day snowfall in Pennsylvania  topping the 44 inches that fell in 1958. Erie County Executive Kathy Dahlkemper issued a temporary disaster emergency declaration that mobilized resources to help the area.
 Erie resident Brian Sheridan  on Wednesday posted a photo on social media showing the top of  his  mail box peeking out underneath a mound of snow. In a caption   he  wrote: “At this point  it just might be easier to put a hold on our mail until spring.”
Neutral

What is the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Antonin Scalia ? With “Scalia Speaks: Reflections on Law  Faith  and Life Well Lived ” Christopher J. Scalia and Edward Whelan have given us a treasure that captures Justice Antonin Scalia’s brilliance  wit  faith  humility and wide range of knowledge. When I read this collection of his speeches  edited by the justice’s son and one of his law clerks  I feel like  Scalia  is in the room with me. Taken together  the speeches are a book-length argument for constitutional originalism and for  Scalia ’s understanding of the role of judges in the United States. Anyone who wants to understand Scalia as a person and as a judicial philosopher should start by reading this book.
[ Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia  dies at 79]
 Scalia   in my view  is the best justice who has ever served on the Supreme Court in its 227-year history.  He  and Justice Joseph Story are the only two justices to have published books on constitutional and statutory interpretation.  Scalia  articulated a clear philosophy of a judge’s role  to which  he  always adhered.  He  was one of the two best writers ever to serve on the court and was equal on this score to Justice Robert Jackson  known for  his  fine literary style. No other justice traveled so much and spoke to so many audiences in the United States and abroad. Finally   he  was to originalism what Saint Paul was to Christianity — a tireless and widely traveled evangelist of the gospel. Understanding Scalia is thus imperative for all law students  lawyers and educated lay people. Because the book is a collection of speeches  many of which were given to lay people  it is very readable  understandable and fun for most age groups.
“ Scalia  Speaks ” by Antonin Scalia  Edited by Christopher Scalia (Crown Forum)
Addressing the difference between American and European values   Scalia  notes that “the United States was settled primarily by people seeking  in one way or another  refuge from the ways of Europe. The men who founded our Republic did not aspire to emulating Europeans at all — to the contrary  the project of drafting the American Constitution was largely about ensuring that the American people would never languish under the yoke of a European-style government.”
This is a critically important point that many fail to appreciate. The legal academics and public intellectuals who love European socialism overlook the fact that the United States  under its unique Constitution  is the third-most-populous country in the world  covering the fourth-largest territory  and has by far the highest gross domestic product per capita of any of the Group of 20 nations  a strength that allows us to do more to help the poor around the world while offering military defense to a range of countries. Few people choose to move from the United States to other countries  but millions of people want to live here.  Scalia  appreciated that the reason for this is that the U.S. Constitution is an engine of power and economic growth that sustains “life  liberty and the pursuit of happiness.”
As an excellent writer   Scalia  offers advice on the craft. “Time and sweat ”  he  says  are the keys to good writing  and a well-written document emerges only after many drafts. “I think there is writing genius ” he  says  just as there is musical genius  “which consists primarily  I think  of the ability to place oneself in the shoes of one’s audience; to assume only what they assume; to anticipate what they anticipate  to explain what they need explained  to think what they must be thinking; to feel what they must be feeling.”
 Scalia  regrets that most American college and law students never read the Federalist Papers and therefore do not understand our Constitution or the American founding very well.  He  tirelessly urges us to learn from the wisdom of the framers of our Constitution  which so few Americans tend to do.
In a chapter on “Original Meaning ” Scalia reveals that at a conference  he challenged Attorney General Edwin Meese III on how to assess the Constitution’s original intent. Meese argued in favor of a judicial philosophy that searched for the original intentions of the framers. Scalia said he favored searching for the original meaning of the words of the Constitution instead. In his speech at the conference  he strongly set out the case for original public meaning  persuading Meese’s chief of staff  Ken Cribb  by the force of his argument. After  Scalia  finished speaking  Cribb scrawled the word “Stipulated” on a piece of paper and taped it to the podium. Two days later  President Ronald Reagan informed  Scalia  that  he  was going to be nominated to the Supreme Court.
 Scalia  speaks in  his  own words in this magnificent volume that should be on the bookshelf of every educated American.
Positive

What is the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Jackie Wilson ? Burge was not in court  but  Jackie Wilson   wearing a gray-and-black striped jumpsuit  repeatedly picked up a black-and-white picture of the former officer as  he  emphatically and sometimes tearfully alleged that officers beat  him   kicked  him  in the groin  put a gun in  his  mouth and gave  him  electric shocks. Believing  he  would be killed if  he  didnât confess   Wilson  said   he  told officers  he  was present when  his  brother Andrew shot and killed officers Richard OâBrien and William Fahey in February 1982.
 Wilson   now 57  said he would have confessed to shooting the president if the detectives had asked him. âI told them  âGame over â¦ whatever you want me to say  Iâm gonna say it â â he said. âI wanted it to stop.â
Wednesdayâs hearing  part of  Wilson âs attempt to win a new trial  illustrates the broad and long-lasting consequences of the Burge scandal. The all-day hearing barely touched on  Wilsonâs  guilt or innocence  instead turning on the question of whether  his  confession was coerced.  Wilson âs lawyers argue that  he  should be granted a new trial with the confession suppressed  which could make it difficult for prosecutors to retry  him .
 Wilsonâs  bid is based in part on evidence that Burge or his subordinates tortured other men  including his late brother  Andrew  who was found by doctors to have numerous injuries after his interrogation.  Jackie Wilson âs attorney  Flint Taylor  described a âmountain of evidenceâ of torture by officers including Burge  who was never prosecuted for torture but was convicted in 2010 of lying about the abuse of suspects.
In a deposition related to the  Wilson  case  Taylor said  Burge invoked his Fifth Amendment right to not incriminate himself. On Wednesday  a former stateâs attorney involved in the case  Lawrence Hyman  did the same.
Michael OâRourke  a private attorney working as a special prosecutor  acknowledged abusive practices by officers in other cases but denied that  Jackie Wilson  was harmed or coerced into confessing. OâRourke pointed to photos of  Wilson  taken after his interrogation that showed no visible injuries.
âItâs almost like he wants to metamorphosize into  Andrew Wilson  â OâRourke said. âThis case is not  Andrew Wilson .â
Faheyâs brother  Mike  who sat through the hearing alongside his sister  said he does not believe  Jackie Wilson  was abused. He said he believes  Wilson  committed the crime and is just echoing other abuse allegations against Burge and  his  men.
 Wilson âs case is central to a saga that continues some three decades after allegations of torture against Burge and his âmidnight crewâ burst into public view.
Scores of African-American men have accused Burge  who is white  and his colleagues of torturing or abusing them during the 1970s and 1980s on the South Side. The allegations include claims similar to those  Wilson  makes; officers have been accused of using electric shocks to the genitals of suspects and forcing them to play Russian roulette  among other things.
Wednesdayâs hearing on the  Wilson  case was mandated by the Illinois Torture Inquiry and Relief Commission  which found âcredible evidenceâ that  Wilson  was tortured after  his  arrest in 1982  though the commission noted discrepancies in  his  statements over the years.
Prosecutors said  Wilson  looked on as  his  brother  Andrew  grabbed Fahey's gun and shot him in the head. In his confession   Jackie Wilson  said that after he shouted that O'Brien was alive and moving  his brother shot the officer again as he lay wounded on the ground.
 Andrew Wilson  also confessed and also alleged  his  confession was coerced through torture.  He  was found by doctors after  his  arrest to have numerous cuts  bruises and burns.
On the stand Wednesday   Jackie Wilson  said  he  was viciously abused by officers including Burge after  his  arrival at a South Side police station.  Wilson   occasionally weeping  said  his  denials of knowledge of the crime were met by escalating abuse.  He  said officers hit  him  with a phone book and put a gun in  his  mouth before Burge brought in an electrical device police used to shock  him .
After OâRourke raised an objection to a question involving the word âtorture  â Wilson  pointed at  him  and angrily asked  âWhat would you call it?â

Neutral