In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: insult and non-insult. Insult is any lanugage or act that is disrespectful or scornfully abusive.

[Q]: Comment: As much as everyone here would like to believe that, his argument is there was no legal probable cause to justify the search warrant in the first place. To use an analogy, what if I were to go to the police and say, "I saw justmyview371 kill Allie, and hid her body in his spare bedroom." Would my outright lie be probable cause enough for a judge to issue a search warrant and, consequently, for the cops to force their way into your house and tear up your home?

Likewise, if the evidence against this guy was wrongfully procured, then any subsequent action resulting from that evidence would be invalid. The Protestants that founded this country built into the Constitution in order to protect our rights against actions that their former English government wrongfully used against their own people.

The prosecutors bungled this case. They should have known their video evidence was wrongfully procured (if that was indeed the case), then procured alternate evidence with which to prosecute.
[A]: Non-insult


[Q]: Comment: The Nones on the Bus view the Church through a rear view mirror. As they pull out, they hear the fading sounds of "All are welcome.." and they feel the pain of irony and lies. They are women who practice birth control amid a "sinner" cry of celibate cardinals; they are students at Notre Dame and Georgetown told by the Newman Society they aren't at authentic Catholic universities; they  are young kids told by the bishop Grandma and Uncle Mike aren't invited to the altar with them; they are gays told to follow as truth apparitions in long-ago places but to distrust their consciences; they are laity told "It's not about clerical power," then ordered to know their place;  they are young couples told by old men when, how, and why to have intimate relations; they are activists  in a democracy who received a letter from the bishop proclaiming to not tell them how to vote--then tells them how NOT to vote; they are told JPII is "Great," but Francis is confusing;  they are told EWTN has truth...
[A]: Non-insult


[Q]: Comment: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried.   So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots?  Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
[A]:
Insult