In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

[Q]: Comment: Jill: Just another note.....the rather infamous incident you reference involved a "he said, she said" sexual assault?/consensual sex? incident involving a young lady and three (now ex-) basketball players.  We could spend hours debating the incident.  However, in all fairness, you should refer to "allegedly GANG RAPED".  I spoke out at the time, and will repeat, the Administation's actions were deplorable and violated every standard for patient/therapist confidentiality.  I very much agree that the U of O has a very self-serving "flexible" standard of privacy.  It's cost them a great deal of money in the past and will cost them a great deal more unless they develop and honor a decent standard of privacy.  regards, Gary Crum
[A]: Sexual-explicit


[Q]: Comment: You seem to hate Canada.
[A]: Non-sexual-explicit


[Q]: Comment: Mr Turok, you act as if this is all new to you? That's very hard to believe.  It was blatantly obvious that Zuma was a corrupt individual with charges hanging over his head at the time he was elected ANC leader.  Now the SACP/ANC/COSATU and others, who assisted his ascension to President of the Mafia State are feeling sorry for themselves.  Forgive me while I enjoy a bit of schadenfreude...
[A]:
Non-sexual-explicit