In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

[EX Q]: Comment: A witch hunt, nothing more nothing less. Did she give any thought to the 3,000 who died in New York and what success has the ICC had to date with the untold $millions which have been spent by this elitist "old boys' club". Pray tell why the Sudanese President is still at large and Mugabe travels freely throughout the world? Ermine robed, latte sipping parasites - that is the ICC.
[EX A]: Non-identity-attack

[EX Q]: Comment: Well, Mr. Foreskin, I can see that you're a real thinker, to equate the moron you no doubt voted to put in the White House, with...not another President, nor someone who has exhibited behavior that anything even remotely near the disaster that is Trump, but instead resurrect yet another debunked conservative lie/conspiracy theory.  SMH.
[EX A]: Non-identity-attack

[EX Q]: Comment: Well, now, up until the last sentence I was willing to consider your point of view.  But you had to inject a racist comment, and that invalidated your entire post as far as I'm concerned. Yes, people who denigrate whites are just as racist as those who commit racial slurs against blacks or Latinos or other people of color.  It is apparent that you don't like whites in Langley ("that is a shame").  So, Mstraub, to you I say:  suck it up, cupcake and soldier on, we're here to stay.
[EX A]:
Identity-attack