In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.
--------
Question: Sentence: Sam took French classes from Adam, because he was eager to speak it fluently.
 Reason: The 'he' refers to sam because Sam was eager to put to practice what he learnt. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

Answer: Correct


Question: Sentence: Jane knocked on Susan's door, but there was no answer. She was out.
 Reason: The 'She' refers to susan because she was not present on the night she died. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

Answer: Wrong


Question: Sentence: In the storm, the tree fell down and crashed through the roof of my  house. Now, I have to get it repaired.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the roof because it is a large tree, it is a part of the roof, and it is the roof of. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

Answer:
Wrong