Given a document, an entity and its sentiment towards the entity, verify if it is the correct sentiment towards the entity. Answer should be yes or no. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

[Q]: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Mayim Bialik is Neutral . Actress Mayim Bialik  says  she 's "truly sorry for causing so much pain" with  her  New York Times opinion piece that critics suggested put blame on women who've accused movie mogul Harvey Weinstein of sexual assault and sexual harassment.
 Bialik  wrote in the piece published Friday that  she  makes choices to be "self-protecting and wise " like dressing modestly and not acting flirtatiously.  She  later added that nothing "excuses men for assaulting or abusing women" and women should be able to wear whatever they want and act however they want.
 Bialik  addressed the backlash in a Facebook Live interview with the Times on Monday  saying  she  regrets it "became what it became."
 She  said Wednesday on Twitter that "what you wear and how you behave does not provide any protection from assault."
[A]: yes


[Q]: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Rand Paul is Positive . The Senate passed a sweeping bipartisan spending bill Friday morning  but not before the federal government shut down when Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) delayed the vote past midnight to complain about the budget deficit. It was the second government shutdown in less than three weeks.
Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) on Feb. 8 spoke on the Senate floor against a bipartisan budget deal and delayed a vote on the measure. (U.S. Senate)
Then  as an expected vote approached in the Senate   Paul  began to throw up roadblocks  demanding a vote on  his  amendment that would demonstrate how the two-year budget deal breaks past pledges to rein in federal spending.
GOP leaders refused to allow  him  to offer the amendment  arguing that if  Paul  got an amendment vote  many other senators might want one  too.  Paul   in turn  refused to allow the vote to go forward  making use of Senate rules that allow individual senators to slow down proceedings that require the consent of all.
“I can’t in all good honesty  in all good faith  just look the other way because my party is now complicit in the deficits ”  Paul  said on the Senate floor as evening pushed into night.
 Paul  objected after a visibly irritated McConnell tried to move to a vote. Then  Paul  launched into a lengthy floor speech deriding bipartisan complicity on deficit spending while the country goes “on and on and on  finding new wars to fight that make no sense.” The senator direly predicted a “day of reckoning ” possibly in the form of the collapse of the stock market.
As the hours ticked on   Paul  repeatedly refused to consent to allowing the vote to happen  as lawmakers and aides of both parties grew increasingly annoyed at  him . Sen. John Cornyn (R-Tex.)  leaving the floor after an unsuccessful attempt to curtail  Paul ’s standoff  called the gambit “grossly irresponsible” and said that leaders would not entertain  his  demand for a vote.
Senators of both parties were left fuming  with most of their ire directed toward  Paul .
“ He  has mastered the art of ticking off  his  colleagues ” said Sen. Christopher A. Coons (D-Del.).
“It’s a colossal waste of everybody’s time ” said Sen. John Thune (R-S.D.). Of  Paul   Thune said  “He never gets a result.”
 Paul himself  made no apologies as  he  delivered one floor speech after another  casting  himself  as a lone defender of fiscal austerity  despite having voted in December for a tax bill that added at least $1 trillion to the debt.
[A]: yes


[Q]: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Rachel Maddow is Positive . Rachel Maddow  Explains How Money Could Be Laundered in Russia
MSNBC anchor  Rachel Maddow  imagined how  she  would launder $10 million out of Russia if  she  were a criminal instead of a broadcaster.
“The first important thing to know about Deutsche Bank in this story  it’s up to its German neck in Russian money laundering ”  Maddow  noted.
“I’m a Russian crook and I grew up practicing judo with Vladimir Putin and he’s given me leave to steal stuff or strip the assets out of some formally state-run company ”  Maddow  said  explaining the character  she  would play in  her  role-playing. “I’m a Russian bad guy. I’ve got ill gotten gains.”
“I’ve got stolen money and I would like to enjoy my stolen money and so in order to do so  I have to secret those funds away somewhere where they won’t get noticed by law enforcement. Where they won’t get taxed. And where anybody who might prosecute me  or persecute me for the way I got this money  they won’t be able to find it and reclaim it and trace it back to me ”  Maddow  continued.
“If I want to get $10 million out of Russia  I want to convert it from Rubles into some other currency. To get it out without anybody noticing  it has to look like that money is leaving the country as some part of legitimate transaction ”  Maddow  noted. “That’s where Deutsche Bank comes in.”
“So you need to have something you’re going to buy for a lot of money. So you have somebody abroad go to the bank and say ‘I have this highlighter and the price of this highlighter I want to sell is $10 million.’ Miraculously  simultaneously at that same moment you pop up in Moscow with your $10 million in ill gotten Rubles and say hey  office  ‘do you know anybody selling something I might be able to buy for $10 million? I was thinking of investing in a highlighter. Do you know anybody selling one for $10 million?’  Maddow  explained  holding up a highlighter.
“I’m the dude in Russia  I hand $10 million in dirty Rubles into the Moscow office. They say you purchased a highlighter ”  Maddow  recapped. “Then over in their other office abroad in London or wherever  that bank’s office  they pay their client $10 million in euros or dollars or whatever and they  you know  collect the highlighter that’s just been sold. And that’s it  that’s how the money moves.”
[A]:
no