In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine the neutral choice based on your inference from the statement and your commonsense knowledge. The neutral choice is a sentence that neither agrees nor disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3', corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence. If sentence X agrees with sentence Y, one's correctness follows from the other one. If sentence X disagrees with sentence Y, they can not be correct at the same time.

[Q]: Statement: which surprised me that that uh through the jury discussion they were able to convince him against his original opinion so maybe that speaks well for juries Choices: 1. Jury discussions never change anyone's opinions.  2. Jury discussions often result in people changing their original opinions.  3. Through jury discussion, they were able to convince him to abandon his original opinion; perhaps that speaks well of juries. 
[A]: 2


[Q]: Statement: To my intense surprise, he replied that, on the contrary, he was extremely likely to be acquitted.  Choices: 1. John Cavendish was the man who was likely to be acquitted. 2. I was not surprised at all that he said the man was likely to go free. 3. I was surprised that he said that the man was likely to be acquitted.
[A]: 1


[Q]: Statement: The Legal Aid board agreed Saturday to close satellite offices in Fayetteville, Madison, Pineville, Welch, Winfield and Williamson. Choices: 1. Legal Aid will close some offices. 2. Legal Aid will close 3 offices. 3. Legal Aid will close six offices.
[A]:
3