Given a document, find the main entity about whom the author is writing. Write the full name if mentioned in the text. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

[Q]: Images of Colbie Holderness after an alleged incident with her then-husband   Rob Porter   in the early 2000s. (Courtesy of Colbie Holderness)
The picture  if you havenât seen it  shows Colbie Holderness  one of  two ex-wives who have accused senior White House aide Rob Porter of physically abusing them . Porter  in the statement announcing his resignation Wednesday  declared that âthese outrageous allegations are simply false. I took the photos given to the media nearly 15 years ago and the reality behind them is nowhere close to what is being described.â
Following a tepid response by White House Chief of Staff John Kelly after news broke of a  Rob Porter's  history of domestic abuse  Post opinion writer Christine Emba says it's time to reconsider the general's "adult in the room" status. (The Washington Post)
Explain how White House Chief of Staff John F. Kelly  who reportedly knew of the FBI reports  could assert  in a statement circulated before and after the abuse photos emerged  â Rob Porter  is a man of true integrity and honor and I canât say enough good things about  him .  He  is a friend  a confidante and a trusted professional.â
 Rob Porter's ex-wife Jennie Willoughby  told The Post in an interview that the White House aide was abusive during their marriage.  Porter  resigned Wednesday after the allegations became public. (Dalton Bennett/The Washington Post)
Consider Porter  the seeming golden boy. Harvard University. Rhodes scholar. Republican bona fides (his father  Roger Porter  worked for President George H.W. Bush;  Rob Porter  served as chief of staff to Utah Sen. Orrin G. Hatch) to match what the Deseret News called his âstrong Latter-day Saint pedigree.â A man like that wouldnât abuse his wife  would he?
[A]: Rob Porter


[Q]: Sen. Elizabeth Warren  D-Mass.  said Thursday that the Democratic primary last year was "fair " moving away from the comments she made last week.
"I agree with what Donna Brazile has said over the last few days; that while there was some bias at the DNC  the overall 2016 primary process was fair and Hillary [Clinton] made history  " Warren  said in an interview with MassLive.
Last week  when asked by CNN's Jake Tapper if the Democratic National Committee had been "rigged" to favor Clinton   Warren  answered  "yes."
 Elizabeth Warren : Yes [Link] pic.twitter.com/TjkBS0mbB8 â The Lead CNN (@TheLeadCNN) November 2  2017
"We've got to hold this party accountable " she continued. "When Tom Perez was elected to chair of the DNC  the very first conversation I had with him was to say  'You've got to put together a Democratic Party in which everybody can have confidence that the party is working for Democrats rather than Democrats working for the party.' "
A spokeswoman for  Warren  later told MassLive that  Warren  believes  as  she  said last week  that the DNC was rigged  but that the primary itself was not.
[A]: Elizabeth Warren


[Q]: The similarities between Joe Kennedy III and Donald Trump are  in a sense  obvious. Both are white men  northeasterners  teetotalers. They are products of the Ivy League and great wealth. They joined their respective family trades – real estate for Trump  politics for Joe III.
The differences are obvious too  and more illuminating. Joe III is a liberal avatar of American institutions: the Kennedy family  Stanford  Harvard Law. Self-effacing in person  he recognizes how easy his path has been – he only briefly served as an assistant DA before taking a House seat -- and had  until now  chosen to mitigate charges of nepotism by playing the part of diligent backbencher. The Kennedys  for all their famous faults  have the saving grace that comes from being in on the joke; when President Kennedy appointed his younger brother attorney general  he quipped that he was just trying to give Bobby some experience before he started practicing law.
The result is the great destabilization of the Trump era. Few  it seems  have a firm grasp on what is happening  let alone what might happen next. Everybody  regardless of their ideology  thinks they're losing. A realignment appears to be happening in our politics  but nobody can agree on what it looks like. "We all feel the fault lines of a fractured country " as  Joe III  put it in  his  stilted  awkward speech on Tuesday night.
There is  of course  an element of nostalgia in liberalism's newfound fondness for our institutions. Trump-era liberalism  with its emphasis on American global leadership and veneration of federal agencies and the mainstream press  would be easily recognizable to that first generation of Kennedys. And in that sense  it makes sense that  Joe III  would become a natural face of contemporary Democratic politics.
Tuesday night was an attempt to make  Joe III  a symbol of institutional resistance to Trump. To the question of whether the institutions are worth saving  and therefore capable of reform   Joe III 's answer is an enthusiastic yes.  He  is  in a sense  already a symbol of how  his  own family has repaired itself from its reckless  impulsive  and selfish ways;  he  seems serious   he  is sober. The message  he  sends is that  his  family   his  party  and all the other institutions that nurtured  him  still have an innate and positive utility  an essential role to play. Where Trump says the rot must be amputated   Joe III  promises that a strong dose of antibiotics is all that's needed.
Whether this message resonates among the Democratic rank-and-file is another story. While the liberal commentariat   Joe III's  natural constituency  remains fixated on norms and the need to defend institutions  a newly ascendant left sees civility as a neoliberal plot to uphold the status quo. And whereas  Joe III  and  his  ilk see Trump as an aberration  the left sees  him  as a symptom of a decayed political order  they  wish to abolish and replace.
Robert Kennedy once said that he wished he had been born poor so he could have been a revolutionary. As his career advances  Joe III might harbor a similar desire  if only because his party is increasingly moving in a revolutionary direction.
[A]:
Joe III