Given a document, find the main entity about whom the author is writing. Write the full name if mentioned in the text. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].
--------
Question: Stephen Paddock  fired hundreds of rounds out of a 32nd story window in the Mandalay Bay Resort and Casino on Sunday night  police have said  killing 59 and injuring over 500 in the deadliest mass shooting in recent US history.
 Paddock  had no military training. According to Paddockâs family and the ongoing police investigation   he  had a penchant for guns and some experience hunting. But there is no indication  he  had formal training.
Nevertheless   he  managed to kill dozens and wound hundreds from 32 stories above the ground and a distance of three to five football fields between  him  and  his  victims.
The reason  he  was able to carry out the massacre lies largely with the tools at  his  disposal and the completely helpless nature of  his  targets.
Some of the weapons had scopes to increase  his  effective range. The length of the bursts of fire suggest  Paddock  likely used extended magazines to store many times a firearmâs normal capacity in ammunition.
All of Paddockâs guns legally belonged to him. Nevada  where  Paddock  lived  allows the sale of high-capacity magazines  high-caliber weapons and ammunition  and military-style weapons  but it doesnât allow fully automatic weapons.
 Paddock  got around the limitation of government-mandated semi-automatic weapons by using something called a âbump stock â which effectively turns a semi-automatic rifle into an automatic  according to The Associated Press.
From 300 to 500 yards away  the crowd of 22 000 were essentially âfish in the barrel â which is how country singer Jake Owens  who was on stage in Las Vegas  described that night. It wouldnât take a military operative or master marksman to inflict grievous damage on a crowd with the tools  Paddock  had available.
 Paddock  simply rained down bullets on an unsuspecting crowd that was focused on the stage. Because bullets from high-powered rifles travel at supersonic speeds  the first shots probably hit the victims before the sound of the rifle even rang out.

Answer: Stephen Paddock


Question: David Scotton  in I Lived on Parker Avenue (trailer image via YouTube)
A documentary about a young man who is grateful to  his  birth mother as well as to  his  adoptive parents.
Do you want to meet gratitude? Then  David Scotton âs your man. At a time when we are taking public-policy advice from traumatized  grieving young students  consider this eternally grateful one.
 David Scotton  is a 24-year-old law student with a little movie with a big message. Adopted at birth   he  allowed  with some hesitation and prayer  a filmmaker to follow along  his  journey from New Orleans to Indiana when  he  was 19 to meet  his  birth parents.
The other day at the Sheen Center in Lower Manhattan  I heard George Weigel  the John Paul II biographer  assert that people of heroic virtue are all around us. Saints  they are frequently known as â in this case  though  not canonized and in Heaven but living in our midst  often unaware that they are sources of great grace and inspiration.  David Scottonâs  birth mother is chief among them. And all those things about saints is true of  her   if the documentary I Lived on Parker Avenue is any indication.
One of the first things  she  wants to do is seek forgiveness from David. For so many years  this mother  suffered with worry that the boy  she  gave birth to would be hurt by the fact that  she  chose to âgive him up for adoption â as the expression goes. Our language for adoption seems to suggest abandonment when  in fact  it is just about the greatest and most loving sacrifice. I think of the story  from the State of the Union some weeks ago  of the young police officer and his wife and a woman named Crystal who is suffering in the grip of addiction. But  she  wants better for  her  baby. And there is a couple who can help  her  realize that aspiration. As there was in the case of  David .
Melissa had the added guilt that she and her boyfriend not only considered abortion when she was pregnant with  David  but that she went to the clinic. In I Lived on Parker Avenue she describes the dramatically painful scene she ran out from. In one of the most uplifting scenes Iâve ever watched on video  Melissa and  David  visit the spot where that clinic once stood. (Itâs a health clinic now  and abortions are no longer performed there.) For him  itâs like the opposite of a memorial dedicated to some grave event. It was there where he was given new life  even in the womb. She should feel no guilt. She gave life and love to  David  and to  his  adoptive mom and dad.
The beauty of I Lived on Parker Avenue is that  in some respects  it isnât primarily about abortion or even adoption  though promotion of âthe adoption optionâ is certainly this young manâs mission. Itâs about gratitude. One of the most compelling scenes of the 30-minute film occurs when  David  expresses in letters â personalized and everything  there are communications beyond text messages still! â what his adoptive family means to him. He wanted to assure his parents and extended family and friends that meeting his birth parents had nothing to do with finding his âtrueâ parents and everything with saying âThank you.â
âWith only two adoptions to every 100 abortions in the United States  and with the stigmas society still unfortunately shares about adoption  it is important to get this film out there â  David  tells me. âEven though I am adopted  I am no different than a biological child. Even though my parents are my âadoptiveâ parents  they are my mom and dad. My âbirthâ parents are exactly that: birth parents. Those distinctions are real and need to be shared.â

Answer: David Scotton


Question: Britain's opposition Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn  told Morgan Stanley that bankers are right to regard  him  as a threat because  he  wants to transform what  he  cast as a rigged economy that profited speculators at the expense of ordinary people.
Morgan Stanley last month warned that political uncertainty in Britain was a bigger threat than Brexit for some domestic investors given the risk of  Corbyn  winning power and radically changing Britain's free-market economy.
"Bankers like Morgan Stanley should not run our country but they think they do " Corbyn  a 68-year-old socialist  said in a video posted on Twitter.
Since Prime Minister Theresa May's botched gamble on a June snap election lost her party its majority in parliament  some investors and many of  Corbyn 's political opponents now see him as a potential prime minister if May's government falls.
 Corbyn  has cast bankers as the villains behind the 2008 financial crisis and promised to increase taxes on the banks and investment funds which trade out of London  the only financial capital to rival New York. Corbyn  said banks like Morgan Stanley were speculators."These are the same speculators and gamblers who crashed our economy in 2008 and then we had to bail them out  " Corbyn  said. "Their greed plunged the world into crisis and we are still paying  the price."Corbyn's manifesto promising renationalization  higher public spending and tax rises  for the rich won  him  40 percent of the votes cast while May's Conservatives won 42 percent.

Answer:
Corbyn