In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

Q: Comment: Oh, those 'naughty' BC Liberals! First, Christy shrugs and says, "The BC voters don't care corrupt we are.", then disappears until the whole thing blows over (she hopes). Then her deputy crime boss, Rich Coleman comes out and throws their donors under the bus. If that wasn't bad enough, Suzanne Anton, Attorney General, stands up in QP and throws their lobbyists under the bus.  Who's next?

A: Non-identity-attack
****
Q: Comment: It was both.  A person doesn't get elected without ignorant voters.

A: Non-identity-attack
****
Q: Comment: And you, Strada, have every right to make moronic comments, to violate logic, make unwarranted assumptions as though they has a basis in the real world and then to refuse to sign the initiative.

A:
Non-identity-attack
****