Given a document, an entity and its sentiment towards the entity, verify if it is the correct sentiment towards the entity. Answer should be yes or no. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

Example Input: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Cara Jesse Nuno is Positive . Cara  and Jesse Nuno
Who:  Cara  and Jesse Nuno
How much: $272 261 in five years 
Cara  and  Jesse Nuno  (Photo: NerdWallet.com)
Six years ago   Cara  and  Jesse Nuno  could not imagine a debt-free life.
 Cara : I think I had suggested [going to a credit counselor] in the past  but at the time Jess was too proud to talk to  them .
Jesse: In 2012  I can’t remember if we saw the advertisement [for the agency] on TV or not  but somehow it just kinda clicked  so we went to  them .  They  gave us April’s number.
April (credit counselor): The majority of  their  debt was old and in collections  so they were really at the “cleanup stage” and [handling each debt] one at a time more than all together. They used a mix of different techniques to address the collections. Some needed to be disputed as already paid or invalid. They also had some that appeared to be past the statute of limitations  so they first needed to verify this with an attorney and then dispute. Others they settled on  but most they made paid in full.
 Cara :  We  kept looking each month at what  we  had and the progress  we  had made. Slowly but surely  as  we  disputed and paid down  our  debts   our  credit scores went up.
 Jesse : Same for me. I was looking forward to the future where one day   we ’d be able to buy things again.
April: When  Jesse  and Cara first came to me in 2012  their credit scores were 536 and 584  respectively. As of 2016  Cara’s was 667 and  Jesse ’s was 758.
 Jesse : I seem to be sleeping better at night  not tossing and turning like I used to  figuring how I’m going to pay this or how I’m going to pay that. It takes its toll — I got the gray hair to prove it.
 Cara :  We ’d like to do some work on the house and get  our  vehicles paid off. Now  we  have a budget  and Jess pays all  our  bills early.
 Cara : It’s OK to ask for counseling to get started with a plan to get your debt paid off. Don’t be embarrassed to ask for help because you’re not the only person that’s been there.
Example Output: yes

Example Input: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Mike Freeman is Positive . Hennepin County Attorney Mike Freeman  declined to confirm the grand jury  citing the secrecy of any such proceeding  but said  he  still intends to make  his  own decision on whether to charge the officer.
Justine Ruszczyk Damond  a 40-year-old life coach  was killed by Minneapolis Officer Mohamed Noor just minutes after she called police to report a possible sexual assault in the alley behind her home. Noor hasn't been charged  and  Freeman  said weeks ago that more investigating was needed in the case. He also told activists in a recorded conversation that he didn't have enough evidence and investigators "haven't done their job."
In recent years   Freeman  has said he would no longer use grand juries to decide whether officers would be charged in police shootings  saying he would make those decisions himself to provide more accountability and transparency.
Marsh Halberg  a criminal defense attorney who is not connected to this case  said it could give  Freeman  a strategic advantage by requiring witnesses to testify under oath and lock down witness testimony in advance of a possible trial. Still  Halberg said  it's unclear whether a grand jury can be used strictly for investigative purposes on the state level  and it's not something he has seen in his 40-year career.
Halberg said  Freeman  could be using the grand jury as "a tactical reason to get evidence from people who are maybe refusing to testify."
Robert Bennett  an attorney for the Damond family  said he and the family support  Freeman 's use of the grand jury and think it's the right thing to do. Bennett said it's disappointing that subpoenas were necessary to get witnesses  including police officers  to be truthful.
Noor's attorney  Thomas Plunkett  issued a statement saying  Freeman 's comments "leave me unclear as to what he is doing." He added that "it would be unethical and potentially unlawful to comment publicly on this development. Worse â any public comment would jeopardize the fairness of an important judicial function."
The grand jury process has been criticized for its secrecy and because it rarely results in charges against officers.  Freeman  broke precedent with the standard practice of using grand juries to decide charges in police shootings after the November 2015 death of Jamar Clark.  Freeman  noted at that time that grand juries had been used to consider police shootings in  his  county for more than 40 years and no officers had been indicted.
Example Output: no

Example Input: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Meryl Streep is Neutral . Meryl Streep  tells the Hollywood Reporter âwe are on the way to something betterâ in the aftermath of the deluge of sex assault scandals  but the actress remains silent about one thing; Her support for child rapist and multiple time sex abuser Roman Polanski.
 Streep  appears on the front cover of this monthâs Hollywood Reporter magazine with Steven Spielberg alongside the words  âSpielbergâs post-feminismâ and a blurb about how their new movie  is perfectly timed âamid todayâs attacks on womenâ.
Does " feminist" Meryl Streep  still support Roman Polanski  who raped a 13-year-old girl & now faces 7 new accusations of sexual assault against women & children? pic.twitter.com/BL4LSXLFrt â Paul Joseph Watson (@PrisonPlanet) December 5  2017
Itâs somewhat odd that  Streep  sees  herself  as a feminist champion of powerful women in the face of an army of male sexual abusers  given that  she  has vehemently supported and failed to disavow one of the biggest abusers of them all â pedophile Roman Polanski.
And what does  Meryl Streep  have to say about all this?
 She  was part of a Hollywood movement that repeatedly campaigned for Polanskiâs release and for his ability to return to the United States over the past 15 years.
 Streep   along with numerous other members of the Hollywood elite  gave Polanksi a standing ovation at the Academy Awards in 2003 after Polanski was awarded an Oscar for The Pianist.
Thereâs no plausible deniability here. Unlike with Weinstein   Streep  canât claim  she  didnât know Polanski was a child rapist. Everybody knew.
Every time  she  has been asked about Roman Polanski   Streep  has defended him.  She  has not disavowed the admitted child rapist and accused serial sex abuser of women and children in the two months since the Hollywood and political sex abuse scandal broke.
How can  Streep  legitimately call  herself  a âfeministâ and say  she  is standing up for female victims of sexual assault given this refusal to disavow?
 Meryl Streep herself  referred to Harvey Weinstein as âGodâ during a 2012 speech  labeling him âthe punisherâ.
 Meryl Streep  2017: Weinstein is "disgraceful".  Meryl Streep  2012: Weinstein is "God " he's "the punisher".[Link] pic.twitter.com/QCvdLy47s0 â Paul Joseph Watson (@PrisonPlanet) October 9  2017
This kind of rampant hypocrisy is par for the course when dealing with Hollywood celebrities  but  Streep  takes it to another level.
Lena Dunham was vilified when she took the side of a male colleague accused of sexual assault  yet  Streep  has refused to withdraw her support for admitted rapist Roman Polanski and she is given a free pass.
Example Output:
no