The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the vouch-fair strategy, otherwise output No. vouch-fair is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to call out fairness for personal benefit, either when acknowledging a fair deal or when the opponent offers a deal that benefits them. This can be through an explicit call out or can be implied.

[Q]: Context: 'I like your plan.  It is simple. I will agree to that.' 'So all that is left is water, i guess i should atleast drink alot of it if i wont eat much haha 🙂' 'For sure, and you will need some way to put out the fire. 😮'
Utterance: 'Haha good point, you worked with me on the firewood so i am ok with you getting two waters and i will get one, deal?'
[A]: No


[Q]: Context: 'Hm. Getting warmer. What do you need the most of? ' 'I need more water than the other options, you can keep 2 food and 2 firewood but 1 water' 'I also feel that water is the most important. How about I take all 3 water, and you can take 2 firewood, and 2 foods?'
Utterance: 'I think the fairest thing would be that you keep 1 water, 2 food, 2 firewood'
[A]: Yes


[Q]: Context: 'Firewood, due to the area that we are going to. How about you? ' 'Oh I see. You can have all 3 firewood if you are ok with me taking all 3 food.' 'Hmm, well I'd love to get some of the food. What I took 2 firewood, 1 food and 1 water? '
Utterance: 'Sorry but I really need all 3 food. All the food I brought with me has spoiled because the AC in my car broke. ☹️'
[A]:
Yes