In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

[EX Q]: Comment: Who did he "rape" exactly? Unless you have definitive proof I don't ever want to see you post the term "alternative facts".
[EX A]: Non-identity-attack

[EX Q]: Comment: Right, mildmannered, as the past is the future. Don't you wonder why the police haven't stopped all crime from happening based on criminal background checks and the past? You've vetted minimum-wage library book shelvers more carefully? That's because you're a stone-cold cretin.
[EX A]: Non-identity-attack

[EX Q]: Comment: "All Muslims are terrorists, that is a fact, they either pull the trigger or support those who do"

Sherimv: did you see this comment? 

I agree with your comments. people should be able to state their opinions. but i think those opinions should be based on facts. there are a lot of muslims (the ordinary everyday billion majority of them) who denounce terrorism. the reason i responded to this comment of yours was because i wanted to point out that the situation for muslims is similar to what you describe above. these people are muslim, but say they totally disagree with terrorism. 

i didnt respond to the other comment. seemed no room for reasonable dialogue, as there might be from you
[EX A]:
Identity-attack