Given a document, find the main entity about whom the author is writing. Write the full name if mentioned in the text. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

Input: Consider Input: Sarkozy rejects cash claim  says France not corrupt
 President Nicolas Sarkozy firmly rejected on Monday allegations that he took illegal cash donations from France's richest woman  declaring "France is not a corrupt country."
 Sarkozy backed Labour Minister Eric Woerth  accused of accepting 150 000 euros (190 000 dollars) from L'Oreal heiress Liliane Bettencourt as chief fundraiser for the 2007 campaign.
 "France is not a corrupt country " the president declared in a prime time interview on French television. "The political class  left and right alike  is in general honest. French public officials are people of great rigour."
 The three-week scandal has weakened Sarkozy  whose poll ratings have hit their lowest level since he took office in 2007 and who is fighting a difficult battle on pension reform  a centrepiece of his political agenda.
 Sarkozy said it was a disgrace to accuse him of visiting Bettencourt's home to pick up illegal cash donations  and suggested those behind the allegations were taking part in "defamation  a campaign."
 "Eric Woerth is an honest man  a competent man. He enjoys my full confidence " Sarkozy said  during the interview broadcast on state television from the gardens of the Elysee presidential palace.
 But Sarkozy said he would advise Woerth to step down as treasurer of the majority UMP party to "devote himself exclusively to pension reform."
 And  in a gesture to critics who say Woerth's party and ministerial roles are incompatible  Sarkozy said he wanted a cross-party commission to draft guidelines "to avoid in the future any form of conflict of interest."
 Sarkozy argued that if money had been his prime motivation  he would have chosen "another career than politics  serving my country  as I have over the last 35 years."
 He spoke after police searched seven homes and offices including that of a friend to Bettencourt as part of several probes involving the billionaire  from a family feud to allegations of illegal campaign financing.
 She was also one of the biggest beneficiaries of a tax break for the wealthy passed by Sarkozy after he won the 2007 election  receiving a lawful 30-million- euro rebate.
 Sarkozy "is the main obstacle in the way of independent justice. He is the main obstacle to allowing truth to emerge " said Socialist Party spokesman Benoit Hamon.

Output: Nicolas Sarkozy


Input: Consider Input: Sen. Tom Cotton (R-Ark.) arrives for a weekly Republican Party luncheon at the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 17. (Jonathan Ernst/Reuters).
 Sen. Tom Cotton (R-Ark.)  last week helped kill the bipartisan immigration deal in Congress.  He  didn't think the bill went far enough in transforming the U.S. immigration system. Like President Trump   Cotton  thinks the United States should cut legal immigration. The senator's reasoning?
âIt can't simultaneously be true that robots will take all the jobs & that the West needs millions of new immigrants to do the grunt work â tweeted  Cotton  in late January  quoting a Wall Street Journal op-ed from a conservative commentator.
âI think itâs certainly critical that we reduce unskilled and low-skilled workers. It canât both be true ... that we need both more unskilled and low-skilled workers  but robots are going to take all the jobs â  Cotton  told Vox.
âTom Cotton is woefully misinformed â said Joe Brusuelas  chief economist at RSM. âRobots will create more jobs.â

Output: Tom Cotton


Input: Consider Input: Henry Olsen  author of The Working Class Republican: Ronald Reagan and the Return of Blue-Collar Conservatism  discussed the similarities between the  Reagan  and Trump coalitions with SiriusXM host Alex Marlow on Breitbart News Daily.
Marlow asked how  Reagan  came to be seen as a libertarian icon  âbasically the type of guy that just wants to cut taxes on the nine smartest people in the country so that they can save us from ourselves with the lack of government â when in truth he âfought for the dignity of working people and had a huge appeal to blue-collar Americans.â
â Ronald Reagan  talked a lot about freedom. What happened  I think  was that libertarian Koch sort of people  as you put it  latched onto this guy who interpreted them for the masses in their own light â Olsen replied.
âWe tend to forget that one of the Koch brothers ran against  Ronald Reagan  in 1980 because David Koch was a libertarian.  Ronald Reagan  wasnât â  he  pointed out. âBecause  Ronald Reagan  was so staunchly in favor of freedom  they have interpreted  him  in a way that took out all the nuance and all the detail. The fact is that  Ronald Reagan  was somebody who raised taxes to support working people in the dignified pursuit of their own lives.â
Olsen recalled  his  own history with the Republican Party beginning with volunteer work when  he  was just twelve years old. âI was so diehard I went in on the day that Nixon resigned. I worked my way through the party  was a candidate at one point  and I got into  Reagan  because that was what you breathed in California in the 1970s â  he  said.
âBut after 2008  I looked and I saw a Republican Party that was worse off than at any time in my adult lifetime â he continued. âI thought  â Reagan  turned it around. How did  he  do it?â I started studying  him   and thatâs when I learned that everything I knew about  Reagan  was wrong  that  Reagan  turned it around precisely because  he  wasnât the archetypal Ayn Rand libertarian that I had been told  he  was.â
â Ronald Reagan  first and foremost was somebody who put people first â Olsen said. â He  loved the American people.  His  epitaph says it all. Youâll go to Thomas Jeffersonâs grave and youâll see âAuthor of the Virginia Declaration of Rightsâ and âCreator of the University of Virginia.â Well   Ronald Reaganâs  says on  his  last words  is that  he  knows man is good  that right will eventually triumph  and there is purpose and worth to each and every human life. That is the heart of Reaganism.â
â He  believed that freedom was important and essential to that  but  he  also believed that government support was essential to that. Thatâs why  he  supported Social Security  itâs why  he  supported federal aid to help the poor pay medical bills  and itâs why  he  always supported a social safety net â and immigration and trade restrictions  when doing that would help the American worker â Olsen noted.
 He  was critical of modern politicians attempting to appropriate  Reagan âs memory for their own purposes  including Senator Ted Cruz. âNobody quotes  Reagan  more and understands  him  less â Olsen said.
âRegan said that the Republican platform should be âno pale pastels  only bold colors.â Then you read what he actually proposed in that same speech  and it had an energetic support for environmental protection  an energetic support for a real safety net  a very limited attempt to restrict federal spending  no discussion of entitlements.  Ronald Reaganâs  bold colors would be called pale pastels by Ted Cruz â  he  charged.
â Reagan  was so far ahead of the curve that people only turned around the curve decades after  he  had already laid it out â Olsen said.
âThe thing to remember about  Reagan  is that you know  Sylvester Stallone was an out-of-work actor who wrote his vehicle to stardom. He wrote âRocky.â  Ronald Reagan  is the political version of that â  he  explained. â He  wrote  his  own speeches all the way up until really the presidency  and then  he  still had a big hand in  his  speeches.  He  thought through  his  principles.  He  created all the words that made  him  governor and then president.  He  was somebody who created the working class Republican-libertarian alliance that was the  Reagan  coalition  and that Donald Trump is recreating today.â
Olsen said  Reagan  had no difficulty reconciling  his  famed âEleventh Commandmentâ â âThou shalt not speak ill of a fellow Republicanâ â with vigorous primary challenges  such as those seen in the 2018 election cycle.
â He  criticized Gerald Ford  but  he  criticized  his  policies.  He  didnât criticize  his  person.  He  didnât make personal attacks â  he  recalled. âThat was what  Reagan  was really talking about  was that you donât want to drag your opponents through the mud because after the primary youâre going to have more in common than you do with the Democrat. So donât drag somebodyâs character through the mud  but make clear that there are real principled differences between you  and let that be the method of decision for Republicans and people who want to participate in the Republican primary.â
âOne thing also about  Reagan  is that  he  never  throughout  his  career  only limited  his  appeal to Republicans. When  his  career was on the line against Gerald Ford in March 1976   he  goes on national TV as a candidate for the Republican primary and says  âI want Democrats and independents to listen too because youâre part of my coalition ââ Olsen said.
Olsen saw the  Reagan  and Trump coalitions as âmirror images of each other.â


Output: Ronald Reagan