Categorize the comment on the basis of obscenity. If the comment is obscene output Yes, otherwise output No.

Example Input: I agree.  The economy grew at a meager 1.4% last quarter.  Most of these  new jobs are minimum wage, part time, with no benefits.

If a Republican had turned in seven years of this poor performance the RG editors would be appoplectic.
Example Output: No

Example Input: For PETA, catching fish is 'animal abuse'.  

For some Hindus, a different religion,  killing mosquitos is forbidden.   

For some Hindus,  the doctrine of Ahimsa  discourages wanton destruction of nature including wild and cultivated plants. Hermits (sannyasins) are urged to live on a fruitarian diet so as to avoid the destruction of plants.

Choose your religion.
Example Output: No

Example Input: House members do not have to rush to vote on Walker and Co.'s  permanent fund dividend scheme that discourages efforts and removes pressures for further cost-cutting measures to our unsustainable state salaries and budget.

According to an article on today's S&P release that was conveniently timed for next week's House of Reps deliberations to SB 128, "Despite the budget deficit, S&P said Alaska continues to have very strong credit quality due to the large reserves it built up over times when oil prices were high."

As was suggested by another columnist - take the time to do it right during next legislative session.
Example Output:
No