In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.
--------
Question: Comment: Too bad these groups don't clamp down on Marxists peddling their filth as fact.

Answer: Non-obscene


Question: Comment: Those same fisherman also leave the state with the profits that are not subject to an Alaska income tax.

Answer: Non-obscene


Question: Comment: ctd..

I'm not saying there's any meaning or any lessons to be derived from this fact other than maybe the problem of hate/violence against identifiable groups based on religion, ethnicity, or whatever, goes beyond, or has got almost nothing to do with, debating in a responsible way the type of issues mentioned above.

I guess I am saying that if we censor or suppress a legitimate debate about these issues then the extremists and the crazy people will occupy the space instead.

Answer:
Non-obscene