We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Example Input: Sent1: We must look into why the person raped a child or murdered a father.
 Sent2: One of the many grievances I have is that child rapists don't qualify for the death penalty unless the child that gets raped is also killed.
Example Output: Not similar

Example Input: Sent1: You are against of violence, but have you ever thought that death penalty is also violence?
 Sent2: You can't get much worse than a death penalty.
Example Output: Not similar

Example Input: Sent1: If the justice system is organized and operated correctly, then I believe the death penalty should be used, but it should only be used in very severe cases.
 Sent2: I think the death penalty should only be used in extreme cases where the accused is, without a doubt, guilty.
Example Output:
Similar