In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

[Q]: Comment: Peter: The reason why it's difficult to take deal with issues raised in the letter is that the writer is largely dealing in hyperbole and bromides.  

Here's an example: "Trump’s tax cuts would increase investment, boost productivity and wages and increase innovation and opportunities for all Americans." That's silly. Tax cuts for the super-wealthy don't result in any of those things (or if they do the effect is neglible). The Bush tax cuts sure didn't result in that stuff. 

Most of the other statement are similar. Just a whole bucket of simplistic statements with little regard for the complexity of any of these issues.
[A]: Non-identity-attack


[Q]: Comment: Ige is a fool, a 100 kiloton nuclear explosion would make the island uninhabitable, assuming you were lucky enough to survive the blast. 
You don't recover from that, you evacuate. Too bad Hawaii doesn't have the Super ferry. The next time there's any type of disaster in the state I'm sure we'll all be wishing we did.
[A]: Non-identity-attack


[Q]: Comment: Put yourself in the Owner's situation.  Are you willing to risk say 15% of your annual salary along with the chance of being recognized as elite by all your peers for some unknown salary increase in the future?  Imagine if the Oilers lost McDavid next year for the balance of the season (like the Islanders lost Tavares in 2014) and the impact that would have on their SC chances and monetary payoff from a SC run.  It is easy to say players want to go so let them go but the Owners have a significant investment at stake for clearly undefined results.

If I were an Owner, I would let the players go as I believe in the tradeoff but I can understand how many small minded, internally focused Owners would be reluctant to make the same decision.

And the issue is as much with Rene Fasel as it is with Bettman.  If this player demand was so strong, then Fehr should have negotiated it months ago.  This supposed "take it or leave it" offer is an excuse.  He is s*cking and bl*wing at the same time.
[A]:
Non-identity-attack