instruction:
In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.
question:
Comment: Yes I do, but sexually assaulting a 14 year old boy is the 8th degree if Gacey is the 10th.
answer:
Sexual-explicit


question:
Comment: RadirD, Kim Jung Un and the DPRK regime threaten us all the time.  Why would Trump or any other rational person use that as a line in the sand?  It took them a few hours after his asinine statement to threaten us yet again.  Foolish.

The only person who yells out "I'm going to punch you in the face!" is a coward who doesn't actually want a fistfight (like Kim Jong Un).  A serious person would just slam you in the kisser without warning.

Don't get me wrong, the DPRK is a growing and serious threat and there may not be a way out of a conflict at this point.  They have been seriously mishandled and underestimated by every president (both GOP and Dems) since the Korean war.
answer:
Non-sexual-explicit


question:
Comment: The "regressives" have everyone believing that humans are the SOLE cause of our changing climate; which is just not the case. Some of the statements  in this article about preparedness and transparency are absolutely astonishing for modern day political party; but not so shocking coming from this band of incompetents.
answer:

Non-sexual-explicit