In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Q: Comment: I blame this crap on Pete Carroll. He could have done the NFL a solid by signing Kaep, now we gotta hear about a QB who has never grown, and wants starter money in order to be a backup can't get a job for some reason, avoiding those listed above and making it a blackballed thing, oh joy.

A: Obscene
****
Q: Comment: As a one more I ask you and others to type "Study links low intelligence and low I Q., to conservatism and prejudice". And think of what is making you and others angry. I see angry voters voted in more of the same, and kept getting b.s.'d into voting for more of the same for a few election cycles. Now the same angry voters are really mad and are going to vote for another snake oil salesman who'll really finish the job the angry voters are raising hell about. What's that saying about being able to fool some people some of the time? With some it is all of the time.

A: Non-obscene
****
Q: Comment: The thing is, this is the way that O'Malley has talked and acted for many years.  He *was* saying the same things three months ago, and for more than 30 years  before that.  I can't/won't try to speak to the attitudes of many other bishops, but O'Malley got a lot of flack from Trump supporters for his positions on immigration,  usually in the form of an accusation of being a Clinton flack.

A:
Non-obscene
****