Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.

Input: Consider Input: "Each side takes the position of the man who was arrested for swinging his arms and hitting another in the nose, and asked the judge if he did not have a right to swing his arms in a free country. 'Your right to swing your arms ends just where the other man’s nose begins.' " (From a June 1919 Harvard Law Review article by legal philosopher Zechariah Chafee, Jr. titled “Freedom of Speech in War Time”) http://quoteinvestigator.com/2011/10/15/liberty-fist-nose/

If the Little Sisters of the Poor don't themselves believe in using contraception, they have the (religious) freedom to not use it. But when they start trying to impose their beliefs on employees, who might believe otherwise, they are going beyond their own (religious) freedoms and trying to impose their beliefs on others, i.e., to restrict the freedoms of others.

Yes, the lawyers can cite case law and legal doctrine. But none of that changes the basic principle that your freedoms end when you try to extend them to my body.

Output: No


Input: Consider Input: Clinton lied under oath which is why he was impeached.   The sex
was what he lied about.  Their both congenital liars.  Obama is a 
pathological liar.   He should be tried for Treason.  Oregon isn't any better.

Output: Yes


Input: Consider Input: Alaska is not living off the teats of Big Oil. It is the other way around. Big Oil is getting a free ride from Alaskans, because with the free $700 million per year tax credit, Big Oil does not paid any taxes to Alaska. BS 21 has to be replaced with ACES.


Output: Yes