In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Input: Consider Input: Comment: As I said, you insist rhat you should set other people's priorities. You arrogance knows no bounds.

Output: Non-sexual-explicit


Input: Consider Input: Comment: Hogwash Gary - You cannot have your cake and eat it too. That is what I disrespect most about evolutionists, is the hypocrisy. If you are going to live by the sword, you must die by it. At least have the courage to admit and accept it. And why is sexual violence any more unacceptable that violence, the fact is you have no foundation as a Darwinist to condemn anything of this nature. If you are going to travel down this road, then you MUST defend animals we eat, and every other act of "violence" that imposes an outside will upon another being. I can discuss any topic rationally with any person, but hypocrisy is something I will not deal with.

Output: Non-sexual-explicit


Input: Consider Input: Comment: Seriously, Richard.  Life isn't a porn fantasy where 20 year old women enter the first cab they see with a 40 year old cabbie, tell him to rip off her pants (her pants were inside out in the manner that occurs when someone pulls off another's pants) so they can have sex, pissss herself and then have at it and be done (her DNA on his lip, him trying to stuff her wet pants and underwear into the console, etc.) and pass out all within 11 minutes (including him driving her nowhere near her home).

Your point about stupefaction ignores the reality that the more you drink the less you are able to make good judgments about much, including drinking.  That comment you made is blaming her for being drunk.  People have a right to be drunk if they want (or even naked) and no one, NO ONE has the right to use this as an excuse to rape them!

Read Blatchford's take on this.  Circumstantial evidence matters.

I really thought you were smarter than this, Richard.


Output: Sexual-explicit