In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: threat and non-threat. Threat is a statement that someone will be hurt or harmed, especially if the person does not do something in particular.

Example Input: Comment: Vancouver was thinking it was a good idea to pass a law mandating snow tires-  but only if there was snow on the ground? 

How on earth was that law going to be enforced? Who was going to enforce it? How were people going to comply? Check the weather then break out the jack?

Two questions arise in my mind- 

1- Did the author completely miss the actual wording of the proposed law? Because surely a law like that could not have actually been proposed, right? 

2- If the author's research was accurate, it beggars the question: How do people that stupid actually get elected?
Example Output: Non-threat

Example Input: Comment: i'm gonna go out on a limb here and guess that you're not an african-american.
Example Output: Non-threat

Example Input: Comment: Outsider:  Anyone points a weapon at me, my training dictates that I will be  behind cover,  AND,  I will fire first. Anyone openly fires on me I pray they are a bad shot and I will return heavy fire, Dump the Clip, Empty the Cylinder..............

What do YOU not UNDERSTAND about a private individual opening FIRE on the POLICE................

If you do not like the interactions you are having with the Police, try OBEYING the LAWS.........................
Example Output:
Threat