Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.

Ex Input:
https://www.muni.org/Departments/Fire/Wildfire/Documents/ANCHORAGE_WILDFIRE_May_2004_Program_Report.pdf. 

Here is a long winded study the city published. If you read this closely, you will see many notations in regards to the "Fuel" problem on the HillSide. It will also show how we are not truly prepared to address the situation.  Yes, there has been some correction, but nothing compared to what needs to be done. It's not, if it happens, it's when will it happen? Until we take major steps to reduce the fuel up there, it's a future killing field. I no longer have the numbers at my finger tips, but there was another study which identified just how much total fuel was up there. It compared it to "Powder Kegs".

Ex Output:
Yes


Ex Input:
I have a lot of British friends who are more involved in American politics than most Americans. So in exchange I confront them about the real heir to the British throne, the Australian man claiming to be Charles' and Camilla's love child from the '60s. He lives in Australia and has 9 kids. So all nine of his kids would also be in the succession for the throne! I think America should be ready to go to war on behalf of the rightful king of England!

Ex Output:
No


Ex Input:
If you can't tell from the name, it's a troll account. Hopefully it will be banned quickly. These kind of people are the scum of the earth!

Ex Output:

Yes