We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.
--------
Question: LOL...why am I not surprised that you are undaunted by actual facts??

Answer: Invalid


Question: So if we can assume that innocent people are convicted in capital punishment cases, shouldn't we be free to assume that innocent people are being convicted in non-capital punishment cases as well?

Answer: Valid


Question: There must be forensic evidence...fingerprints, DNA, hairs, blood, something physical, IMHO.

Answer:
Valid