Given a paragraph about movies and a set of conversational questions and answers about the paragraph, say whether the passage contains sufficient information to answer the follow-up question. Say Yes if it is answerable; otherwise, say No. The paragraph has the prefix 'CONTEXT:'. Each conversation question has a prefix `Q:` followed by the answer prefix `A:`, and the follow-up question has a prefix `FOLLOWUP_Q:`.

Input: Consider Input: CONTEXT: Well, what we know is that Bill was a former student of Hattori Hanzo. What actually happened between Bill and Hanzo is not clear from the movie. There is also no mention of it on Kill Bill Wikia. However we can assume that Bill learnt the art of swordsmanship from Hanzo and used it for evil. This must have infuriated Hanzo. This kind of stuff is a recurring theme in many movies where a disciple learns a skill from a master and turns again humanity to use those skills, hence infuriating the master. So to me, this seems the possible reason for Hanzo's anger.  <sep>  Q: What did Bill do to make Hanzo mad?

Output: Yes


Input: Consider Input: CONTEXT: I believe the moral of the story is "Don't judge book by its cover". The whole movie is against stereotypes. The bunny should be a carrot farmer, because that's what bunnies do, the predators are bullies an deep down everyone feels that way, because when assumption is made that only predators are going feral, everyone accepts it as truth. You can see that even the fox is bullied for being a predator because he is perceived as one.  <sep>  Q: What is the moral of Zootopia? A: I believe the moral of the story is "Don't judge book by its cover  Q: Is the story about taking risks? A: The whole movie is against stereotypes  Q: What is the relevance of the bunny in the film. A: The bunny should be a carrot farmer, because that's what bunnies do, the predators are bullies an deep down everyone feels that way  Q: What is the relevance of the predators? A: You can see that even the fox is bullied for being a predator because he is perceived as one  Q: isn't the moral about trying everything in life? A: I believe the moral of the story is "Don't judge book by its cover  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Is there anything else that's relevant from the film?

Output: No


Input: Consider Input: CONTEXT: Voldemort didn't know that it held no useful information to defeat Harry. What he did know was that he had been defeated by a baby, who was the likely subject of the prophecy (Neville Longbottom being the other potential subject). He wanted the prophecy so that he could know fully what it said, in case it held any information that would have helped him. He was aware he had only heard part of the details, and given the "defeat" by Baby-Harry, was keen to know the rest in case it gave him a clue how to avoid a repeat of that outcome. He didn't know that it wouldn't help him; and Dumbledore quite possibly thought it worth keeping secret to try and force Voldemort to reveal himself to the public when he tried to get hold of it.  <sep>  Q: Why did Voldemort want the prophecy in Order of the Phoenix? A: Voldemort didn't know that it held no useful information to defeat Harry  Q: If this is the case then why did he want it? A: He wanted the prophecy so that he could know fully what it said  Q: When he found out what it said was it useful? A: He didn't know that it wouldn't help him  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: What else can you tell me about it?


Output: Yes