In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence can be inferred from the statement. Incorrect choices change the meaning in important ways or have details that are not mentioned in the statement. Indicate your answer as 1,2, or 3 corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.

Statement: Okay, Red said, "I guess they'll eat it. Choices:  1. Red conceded they would accept the food. 2. The food would be taken and delivered by Red. 3. We all knew they would turn up their noses at it.
1

Statement: Prototypic substance abuse interventions focus on motivation to enter treatment because the patients are severely dependent, heavy drinkers. Choices:  1. This type of substance abuse intervention has been proven to have some therapeutic value, although the exact amount is not yet known. 2. Some substance abuse interventions focus on enlightening the patient that they are incredibly dependent drinkers, and should therefore seek treatment to break this dependence. 3. Patients who are severely dependent on alcohol are unlikely to seek treatment for any reason.
2

Statement: Jerusalem submitted peaceably to the rule of the Greeks in 332 b.c. under Alexander the Great and, subsequently, to his Hellenistic successors as well as the Egyptian Ptolomeys and the Syrian Seleucids. Choices:  1. Jerusalem never submitted to the rule of the Greeks in 332 b.c. 2. Jerusalem submitted peaceably to the rule of Alexander the Great. 3. Jerusalem submitted more peaceably to the rule of Alexander the Great than it did to his Hellenistic successors.

2