Categorize the comment on the basis of toxicity. If the comment is toxic (harmful, malicious, derogatory, threat, insult, identity attck, etc.) output Yes, otherwise output No.

Q: To some extent being the Governor in Alaska means something.   Individual members of the legislature are NOT the equivalent of the Governor because he/she did not run for or be elected to that authority level.  For this reason it is very important that the Governor be connected to the people.  In this case he (still) is (interested in what they think).  Individual members of the legislature may be sincere in his/her belief system.  But that's all it is: his/her special, personal bias.  Save we pray from the hydra.  Thanks.

A: No
****
Q: What a bunch of cry babies. Do these fools think everything just pops out of thin air to satisfy their needs and feed their faces. They should be more concerned with illegal aliens. How many of them have scrapped their motor vehicles are they riding horses now? It's not a safe world out there so grow up or go crawl into your hole and wish for utopia. What is probably happening is 10% of the people as usual are protesting again the rest don't care. That is a misleading head line the kind the Red Guard likes best

A: Yes
****
Q: This is pretty much exactly how I feel. Damn.

A:
Yes
****