We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Q: Sent1: I am "for" capital punishment... but if a criminal shows a desire for death over a life sentence, I prefer to be sadistic.
 Sent2: I do not support the death penalty - but it's not because I feel bad for criminals.

A: Not similar
****
Q: Sent1: You might say the criminal deserved it, but murder is murder, whether they deserved it or not.
 Sent2: You are probably going to murder somebody; hopefully it will b in a place with the death penalty and then you will get what you deserve.

A: Not similar
****
Q: Sent1: And had the death penalty been in effect, those kids might have died.
 Sent2: The problem with the death penalty is eventually someone will be sentenced to death when they are in fact guilty.

A:
Not similar
****