We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Ex Input:
Sent1: You might say the criminal deserved it, but murder is murder, whether they deserved it or not.
 Sent2: Only if they try to murder somebody after they are in prison do they deserve the death penalty?

Ex Output:
Not similar


Ex Input:
Sent1: i think that life without opportunity of parole is the more humane and just punishment instead of the death penalty.
 Sent2: If convicts believe their innocence, appeals through life imprisonment is much more justifiable because it is easier to atone for a life imprisonment as opposed to death.

Ex Output:
Not similar


Ex Input:
Sent1: I also don't think someone has been put to death for a third degree murder.
 Sent2: I think instead of a death penalty, they should just stay in prison until they die because putting someone to death is just harsh, No matter who it is.

Ex Output:

Not similar