TASK DEFINITION: Categorize the comment on the basis of severe toxicity. If the comment is severely toxic output Yes, otherwise output No.
PROBLEM: More intellectual dishonesty, and you accuse me of being uncivil! Once again, my words are misrepresented by a leftist who cannot  construct a real argument. Has leftism so degraded your mental faculties that you are left with no other approach than the amateurish parsing of language?

I wrote, and meant, "drunken encounters that are later regretted." I'm not sure how you can extrapolate that I excuse date rape from this scenario. The fact that an encounter is "later regretted" would presume that consent was initially given, would it not? Please stop wasting my time, you aren't on my level. 

As far as my tongue in cheek comment that we ship the postmodern feminist crusaders to Saudi Arabia, you would have to be autistic to take this comment at face value.  You don't seem to understand sarcasm, or maybe your misunderstanding is a deliberate attempt to divert the conversation? Please explain.

SOLUTION: Yes

PROBLEM: The weather in Alberta and Alaska are very similar.  You must not live in Alaska.   Please go whine about the ADN somewhere else.  You  are not supposed to be spamming the comments of weather related stories with your opinions about pedophiles.   How is the fire risk in Alaska related to Mr. Dalton, Sir?  Explain it, because it's obvious to no one but you.

Or are you obsessed with sex and wand to draw the entire commenting community into your sick little world sir?  Some of us don't want to read about pedophiles, otherwise we would click on those stories.  Please stop hijacking the comments!!!!!!

SOLUTION: Yes

PROBLEM: What about the guy that RAPED a woman downtown on that crud?????? Or people that kill themselves? As far as I am concerned they could shoot the dealers

SOLUTION:
Yes