We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Q: Sent1: Only some states use the death penalty, only some countries allow the death penalty.
 Sent2: If anything, this kind of "argument" is an argument for abolishing the death penalty, since it isn't used uniformly across the entire country.

A: Not similar
****
Q: Sent1: There are no children being killed, and killing a child is murder in America.
 Sent2: Murders, rapists, child pornographers, etc. literally should die for a better society.

A: Not similar
****
Q: Sent1: I believe there are certain crimes where the death penalty is an acceptable punishment.
 Sent2: Again, I support the death penalty for certain crimes and criminals.

A:
Similar
****