In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Example Input: Comment: Wait for it. Who knows what we'll see. Will Trump want to hug him? Hit him? Cuddle Him? Have you seen Trump's handshake with the Jap PM this morning? Trump looks even sillier than usual and has the Jap leader rolling his eyes because of an overlong and aggressive handshake. I can't stand Justin Trudeau, but I wish him well against this monumental creep on Monday. One a light-minded and handsome Canadian and the other a self-obsessed and literally "loud and obnoxious" American. The world is already watching Trump very closely and I think that Justin will stand out during and after his visit to D.C. - literally because of his good-looks. 21st century man.
I want to see how their handshakes go on Monday - that could tell it all.
Example Output: Non-sexual-explicit

Example Input: Comment: Really no this is completely false so sorry to burst your bubble.  I have already corrected you on this erroneous belief about women elsewhere on this thread however.

Most women have sex with men because they are physically attracted to them and they hope the guy has a decent personality too.  Many women are in horrible relationships with men only because they like having sex with those men and they are conveniently around.  I have found this is true with male friends of mine sometimes too.  They stay with women they don't like and don't want to ever marry out of lust and convenience alone.
Example Output: Sexual-explicit

Example Input: Comment: Holy cow this is the strangest piece I have ever read. 
Unless the council meetings have devolved into f bomb fests, I dont see the point of more rules just for the sake of having them. 
Can we get rid of this kook?
Example Output:
Non-sexual-explicit