In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine the neutral choice based on your inference from the statement and your commonsense knowledge. The neutral choice is a sentence that neither agrees nor disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3', corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence. If sentence X agrees with sentence Y, one's correctness follows from the other one. If sentence X disagrees with sentence Y, they can not be correct at the same time.

Ex Input:
Statement: uh i haven't had too much experience with uh judges and jurors i've uh served on a jury one time and uh i think one of my concerns after that experience was uh finding that there tend to be people in the jury that can't bring themselves to sentence someone Choices: 1. I think it's a flaw in the legal system that many would get to run free simply because people don't want to wish harm upon someone.  2. Jurors tend to be ruthless, and never let someone go without a sentence. 3. I find people asked to be Jurors tend not to want to sentence someone. 

Ex Output:
1


Ex Input:
Statement: For the governmentas major departments and agencies, these laws Choices: 1. It was not for the government. 2. The government agencies enacted several unscrupulous laws over the years. 3. By the agencies and department are these laws

Ex Output:
2


Ex Input:
Statement: One of the best ways to help the approximately 80 percent of low-income persons who need legal assistance but must do without, is to arm self-represented litigants with quality information and assistance. Choices: 1. There is no good solution for low-income persons who need legal assistance. 2. The self-represented litigants will be handsomely paid for their service. 3. Arming self-represented litigants with quality information and assistance is one of the best way to help 80 percent of low-income persons who need legal assistance.

Ex Output:

2