TASK DEFINITION: We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.
PROBLEM: Sent1: Those who claim that Australia suffered a "crime wave" as a result of new gun laws often cite as evidence unrelated figures for common assault or sexual assault (no weapon) and armed robbery (any weapon).
 Sent2: Muggings, burglaries, rapes, assault and battery are all examples of violent crimes that don't require a gun.

SOLUTION: Not similar

PROBLEM: Sent1: Guns don't kill people, if they did, they would go to jail for murder- not the murderers.
 Sent2: people who want to kill, will kill if you ban guns, they will kill with knives, or something else.

SOLUTION: Not similar

PROBLEM: Sent1: and who commits crimes, Criminals, so if you take guns away from law abiding citizens insuring that criminals will still be able to get weapons will have more targets to attack because people don't have any defense against criminals.
 Sent2: I also say that when people commit a crime with a gun these people need to be punished not the law-abiding citizens!

SOLUTION:
Not similar