We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

Example Input: The laws being proposed are serving no purpose, because they're not being enforced.
Example Output: Valid

Example Input: I implied that there are people with guns that are nuts, not that all gun owners are nuts...
Example Output: Valid

Example Input: First off, there's no debate; right-wingers don't speed anymore than left wingers, and there's no factor (besides drugs and alcohol) that would make a person speed more.
Example Output:
Invalid