In this task, you're given a statement, and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence clearly disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3' corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.

Ex Input:
Statement: In addition, these central groups were able to achieve some efficiencies and increase consistency in the implementation of the organization's security program by performing tasks centrally that might otherwise be performed by multiple individual business units. Choices:  1. They were unable to achieve efficiencies. 2. The central groups were able to achieve efficiencies. 3. Consistency was increased.

Ex Output:
1


Ex Input:
Statement: Left to decide what part of the 1996 Act to strike as invalid, the court concluded that congressional intent regarding severability was unclear. Choices:  1. It was decided that the intent of severability was quite clear. 2. As a result, the court left the 1996 Act as it was originally written. 3. The court was able to decide which parts, if any, of the 1996 Act were invalid.

Ex Output:
1


Ex Input:
Statement: Its volume declined by 1.9 billion pieces between 1990 and 1997 Choices:  1. Quality improved. 2. Volume increase over the time period. 3. In eight years volume declined.

Ex Output:

2