In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: insult and non-insult. Insult is any lanugage or act that is disrespectful or scornfully abusive.

Q: Comment: There was no excuse for this. There would have been signs posted saying no entry. Furthermore to get into the tunnel the driver would have had to travel on the street car track.

Penalties for incidents like this should be increased to cover the inconvenience idiots cause. In this case it would be in the $thousands.

Stupidity is not an excuse.

A: Insult
****
Q: Comment: Heck Glenn, you deleted the comment I replied to.

I do have a connection to Fiji, but it isn't as if I live there or anything.  However, I have many friends (or at least people who know me) in Savusavu.  I refuse to "search" for Gabbard's "anti-Muslim" bias.  You need to prove it to me.  I have not seen any evidence so far that it is real.  

She is against "Muslim Extremists" but then who isn't.  And the conflict between India and Pakistan hasn't been resolved all these years later.  But there is no way you can convince me that Representative Gabbard's primary goal in life is to destroy Islam.  

Again, Nuance.  The problems of the world are rarely black and white.  (unless you live in Mississippi, but that is a different subject.)

A: Non-insult
****
Q: Comment: Idiots at the shallow end of the gene pool.

A:
Insult
****