In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine the neutral choice based on your inference from the statement and your commonsense knowledge. The neutral choice is a sentence that neither agrees nor disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3', corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence. If sentence X agrees with sentence Y, one's correctness follows from the other one. If sentence X disagrees with sentence Y, they can not be correct at the same time.

[EX Q]: Statement: We are accustomed to defending free markets as the guarantors of both liberty and prosperity, but here's a case where liberty and prosperity are at  By forcing people to act against their own self-interest in the short run, governments can make everybody more prosperous in the long run. Choices: 1. Governments can make people thrive. 2. Governments can't do anything to fix the economy. 3. Governments can make the economy work for everyone.
[EX A]: 3

[EX Q]: Statement: An old woman can sit. Choices: 1. Elderly women are capable of sitting down. 2. All old women can sit down without assistance. 3. An old man is not able to run.
[EX A]: 2

[EX Q]: Statement: Building on the policies of the moderate scenario, the CEF advanced scenario assumes a doubling of cost-shared R&amp;D investments, resulting in an increased spending of $2. Choices: 1. The CEF advanced scenario assumes a doubling of cost-shared R&D investments, resulting in an increased spending of $2, building on the policies of the moderate scenario. 2. The R&D investments were stopped completely, due to the shortage of qualified professionals. 3. The CEF's moderate scenario assumed a steady cost of cost-shared R&D investments, resulting in no increased spending.
[EX A]:
3