instruction:
In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.
question:
Sentence: Madonna fired her trainer because she slept with her boyfriend.
 Reason: The 'she' refers to the trainer because MADONNA REFER TO HER TRAINER. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
answer:
Wrong


question:
Sentence: The drain is clogged with hair. It has to be cleaned.
 Reason: The 'It' refers to the drain because The hair is what is clogging the drain. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
answer:
Correct


question:
Sentence: Archaeologists have concluded that humans lived in Laputa 20,000 years ago. They hunted for deer on the river banks.
 Reason: The 'They' refers to prehistoric humans because the archaelogists did research. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
answer:

Correct