We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

Q: And if a person has had treatment for a mental disorder, they should be given a mandatory psych exam by a neautral doctor before being denied on a gun purchase.

A: Valid
****
Q: Doctors make medical decisions for you because they have knowledge which the average person does not have.

A: Valid
****
Q: These claims are based on deceptive parsing of statistics and disingenuous use of misunderstood ATF nomenclature, to falsely characterize guns recovered from house fires, floods, natural disasters, estates, and gun buybacks as "crime guns."

A:
Valid
****