In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Comment: Seriously!  As a woman voter I am mostly concerned with someone's hair and whether or not they have a vagina.  I am voting for Hillary because she has a vagina and a really nice helmet of hair.
Sexual-explicit

Comment: See if you can debate rationally rather than launching ad hominem attacks.
Non-sexual-explicit

Comment: @Larry ... You know nothing about me, yet presume because I criticize your hero that I'm "typical left wing". I would call that a typical Trumpkin response. If you paid attention, you'd know that perhaps the loudest, most accurate, criticism of your hero comes from the right. It is also worth remembering, the next time you want to sneer at anything "leftist", that your candidate is running to the LEFT of the democrat on free trade, foreign policy and Wall Street issues.

It also did not escape my notice that you mention pouting and name-calling in your nonsubstantive reply. Do you not realize that Trump is easily the most pouting, whining, excuse-making, name-calling candidate for president in the history of the republic? What level of hypocrisy does it require to cheer him on when he does it, but snivel like a politically correct whiner when someone else does the same?

Non-sexual-explicit