In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: threat and non-threat. Threat is a statement that someone will be hurt or harmed, especially if the person does not do something in particular.

Comment: There is overwhelming video evidence as well as web pages, manifestos, college Campus recruiting posters, etc for ANTIFA, BLM, etc. Not to mention your uncle Soros and his efforts. You know that silly.
Non-threat

Comment: "Additionally, the report found that forests in Southeast Alaska will capture more carbon going forward, though it is only a small region of the state."

Why? How? 
"going forward?" Please, let's kill this nonsensical and completely redundant idiom now.
Threat

Comment: The first sentence says it all about the left-wing bias in this article, 'right-wing agitators'. Come on DP, I can't believe you print this biased crap or hire biased reporters like these two people. No wonder most of the Denver area conservatives no longer pay to read your paper.

Non-threat