TASK DEFINITION: We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.
PROBLEM: Sent1: This is why I advocate explaining the costs of guns as much as possible, and fighting the gun lobby at every turn.
 Sent2: I am, however, suprised that gun rights advocates use this case to defend the right to own guns, because the case seems to imply the opposite, as stated by Tim.

SOLUTION: Not similar

PROBLEM: Sent1: The 2nd amendment only protects a states right to own a Militia.
 Sent2: Amendment protects the right to have an armed militia or to carry arms in the militia, Congress can assume total control over that armed body and grant that control to the President (See Article II section 2).

SOLUTION: Similar

PROBLEM: Sent1: The only way the person would get the gun back is if the person was found not guilty.
 Sent2: But that does not change the fact that the law has made the individual into a prohibited person, so that her gun possession is, in itself, a federal felony.

SOLUTION:
Not similar