TASK DEFINITION: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
PROBLEM: Comment: There seems a bit of a rush by media and their sycophants in the activist community to be apologists for this chap. A little too much enthusiasm for the heart wrenching drama but little objective examination of the story. It's borderline galling that their release was doubtless enabled by US interests yet he harbours  vitriol for America. 

Perhaps he has something to hide?

SOLUTION: Agree

PROBLEM: Comment: You would be unable to cite sources for the"illegality" of the settlements, as there are none. The settlements are built on disputed lands no doubt, but lands that no "Palestinian" country or sovereign political entity has ever had title to. 

Israel has every right to construct settlements on "disputed" lands, until such time as title can be proved to be held by another sovereign entity. The court of public opinion, led by 180 countries that have routinely demonstrated an overwhelming anti-Israel bias, has no standing in this matter, except to those that share that bias.

SOLUTION: Disagree

PROBLEM: Comment: We're not in denial. Telling a woman what not to wear is just as much as a micro-aggression as forcing a woman to wear something she doesn't want to. We hate the niqab and burqa too but realise that they will not disappear with a ban. The only thing Europe has succeeded in doing with their bans is to further ghettoise and isolate the Muslim communities, which makes it easier for radicalisation. Things change by having subsequent generations integrate more into mainstream and secular society, something that Canada does fairly well. It's slow (a matter of generations) but effective, particularly since we do not have nowhere near the same level of influx Europe has.

SOLUTION:
Disagree