In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.

Ex Input:
Comment: Its mostly the same people running it.

Ex Output:
Agree


Ex Input:
Comment: This is great. Pull up a chair and watch the show.

Ex Output:
Agree


Ex Input:
Comment: Ahhh low effort cons always voting against their best interests.  So yes, a person making $205k/yr will see $5k of that taxed at 35%.  Really feel sorry for them.  There has been a massive diversion of wealth into the hands of fewer and fewer people and you conbots think it is about people making $200k a year.     Talk about being duped by your own anger and short sightedness.

As for the Vancouver scenario, let's see, someone making say $210k (one income btw) buys a $1.2 million dollar house in Vancouver proper, he/she would only be paying a 5-6x ratio.   Still doable considering most of our family incomes (2 incomes) come in around $75k nationally; so that family would have to pay 15x ratio.    And of course we are talking about the most expensive area of Canada.    Why you guys need to be dishonest is beyond me.

Ex Output:

Disagree