instruction:
In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.
question:
Comment: Buddhists are FAKES! Their schtick is to shave their heads and wear orange rags begging at doors like the Mormons. They are rude and cheapskates. Not polite or peaceful at all. They covet rich expensive things like ordinary folks. In Thailand the soldiers and police are arresting them for bribes, tax evasion, rape and pedophilia (like Catholics). Trying to arrest one leader in a flying saucer-shaped temple for an investment scam but nobody can find him. They all look alike.
answer:
Identity-attack


question:
Comment: Your coyness doesn't  work with anyone, as everyone knows that your "Drunks' Lives Matter" and "Don't Shoot" is mocking blacks and their Black Lives Matter and "Don't Shoot." Not everyone is as stupid as you.
answer:
Identity-attack


question:
Comment: If you "know" the comment to be uncivil, then why the *&^% are you asking us to vote on it? Furthermore, I vote no 100% of the time which produces a moronic spam notice stating I am excluded from voting though I am still forced to vote, and at no time am I restricted to 3 posts a day. Your bigotry towards Motley, whom at times I loathe, is despicable, but is well expected from the RG that habitually is an effin embarrassment to professional journalism.
answer:

Non-identity-attack