instruction:
In this task, you're given a statement, and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence clearly disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3' corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.
question:
Statement: where my medical where it was worth it to itemize for medical expenses because they were just they were that much of a percentage of my income that it just Choices:  1. With my medical bills it was better to itemise the expenses since it was just a percentage of my income. 2. I didn't bother to itemise my medical expenses, I just took it out of my income.  3. It might be worth it for you to itemise your medical expenses like I did.
answer:
2


question:
Statement: Training programs teach nonfinancial managers the value of financial information and facilitate the pace of change Choices:  1. Training programs teach nonfinancial managers the value of financial information. 2. Training programs don't teach nonfinancial managers the value of financial information 3. Training programs teach nonfinancial managers how to give a lap dance.
answer:
2


question:
Statement: Advisory Council on Clean Air Compliance Analysis Advisory on the Clean Air Act Amendments (CAAA) of 1990 Section 812 Prospective  Overview of Air Quality and Emissions  Modeling, Health and Ecological Valuation Issues Initial Studies. Choices:  1. The Advisory Council said that the Clean Air Act Amendments should be destroyed. 2. This advisory addresses emissions and climate change. 3. The Clean Air Act Amendments were made in 1990.
answer:

1