We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

Example Input: Gun haters are the extremist hate group demanding to ban the right to bear arms!
Example Output: Valid

Example Input: I'm more concerned with the concept of why the individual that committed the murder was able to kill in the first place.
Example Output: Valid

Example Input: I remember reading an article of how a study of 10 years of current gun control laws haven't done anything to make Aussies any safer.
Example Output:
Valid