In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine the neutral choice based on your inference from the statement and your commonsense knowledge. The neutral choice is a sentence that neither agrees nor disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3', corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence. If sentence X agrees with sentence Y, one's correctness follows from the other one. If sentence X disagrees with sentence Y, they can not be correct at the same time.

Example Input: Statement: The Times claimed that the number boycotting never reached a critical mass that would have threatened the integrity of its list. Choices: 1. The boycotting was so severe that the list's integrity was completely destroyed in the process. 2. The boycotting was arranged by an opposing firm that did not believe in the integrity of the list.  3. The integrity of the list could be compromised by boycotting.
Example Output: 2

Example Input: Statement: The data collected in the third phase are not specified before the first  they emerge, often with surprises, from the initial observations. Choices: 1. The data collected in the third phase is the most telling and most significant part of the process. 2. There are two phases to data collection to keep the process swift. 3. Data collected in the third phase may be surprising and unexpected based on initial observations.
Example Output: 1

Example Input: Statement: The 16th-century polychrome rood beam spanning the nave is decorated with 12 prophetesses (on the chancel side) and scenes from the Passion. Choices: 1. The rood beam spanning the nave has a plain design with shades of red. 2. The Passion is represented with 12 prophetesses on the polychrome rood beam. 3. The nave is poorly decorated, despite the elaborate 16th-century rood.
Example Output:
3