Categorize the comment on the basis of toxicity. If the comment is toxic (harmful, malicious, derogatory, threat, insult, identity attck, etc.) output Yes, otherwise output No.

[Q]: Kate Brown hit the Peter Principle level. She is at her own level of incompetence and needs to go back down one step to be able to function. But, oh wait! That position has already been filled. I most definitely would not vote for someone so incompetent.
[A]: Yes


[Q]: I am not disputing pill mills exist. I didn't say anything about marijuana-on you dude. What's wrong with the use of cash? Are you on the side of the hawks that say it's "only" used for laundering and terrorism? Sorry you've lost friends, but that is their issue, not mine. And you're right. I can't accept reality-that's why I dictate it. My world is not your world, and the world you inhabit is obviously based on fear not perception. And how long it takes to pass a drug test, really depends. If you look at the Samsa 5 panel-synthetic opioids aren't even on the list-just naturally occurring ones. It's been a pleasure fighting with you.
[A]: No


[Q]: Until a Bicycle is required to have license plates, registration, insurance, an operators permit, and possibly a safety inspection stay off the road. Its usually the Bike rider who is oblivious to their surroundings.
[A]:
No