instruction:
Given a document, an entity and its sentiment towards the entity, verify if it is the correct sentiment towards the entity. Answer should be yes or no. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].
question:
Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity William Jeffrey Jones is Neutral . A post shared by  William Jeffrey Jones (@wjeffjones)  on Aug 28  2017 at 12:47am PDT
The cat looks fascinated by  the pottery and William Jeffrey Jones  as  he  works on sculpting a new mug.
The duo also have other videos of  them  working on pottery around the studio.
A post shared by  William Jeffrey Jones (@wjeffjones)  on Sep 5  2017 at 12:42am PDT
A post shared by  William Jeffrey Jones (@wjeffjones)  on Sep 8  2017 at 12:37am PDT
"Oh  man... I'm so bummed. I need a hug." #potterycat #kitten #kittenvideo #catvideo #catvideos A post shared by  William Jeffrey Jones (@wjeffjones)  on Sep 19  2017 at 2:10pm PDT
answer:
no


question:
Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Harry Reid is Negative . But Reid is determined to avoid being remembered as another Democrat who tried and failed to make health care access for the middle class a part of America's social safety net.
 "Generation after generation has called on us to fix this broken system " he said at a recent Washington rally. "We're now closer than ever to getting it done."
 Reid wants to finish by the end of the month; he may not get to.
 Reid's bill includes $848 billion over 10 years to gradually expand coverage to most of those now uninsured. It would ban onerous insurance industry practices such as denying coverage or charging higher premiums because of someone's poor health. Those who now have the hardest time getting coverage -- the self-employed and small businesses -- could buy a policy in a new insurance market  with government subsidies for many. Older people would get better prescription coverage.
answer:
no


question:
Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Sadiq Khan is Negative . London mayor Sadiq Khan  unveiled  his  âLondon Planâ on Wednesday  and  as expected  it took a tough stance against a dangerous threat jeopardizing the health and future of the cityâs children. No  itâs not a strategy to protect Londoners from potential terrorist attacks at public festivals this Christmas season. The menace is cellulite and the perp is a cheeseburger.
 Khan âs plan would prevent any new fast-food restaurant from opening within 400 meters of a primary or secondary school  fulfilling a campaign pledge  he  made in 2013. The ban targets âtakeawaysâ that sell food such as fish and chips  pizza  chicken  and other quick bites that are allegedly contributing to Londonâs childhood-obesity crisis. (Nearly 40 percent of children in London are overweight or obese by the time they finish grade school  and the number of obese eleven-year-olds in the city spiked by 22 percent in the last four years.)
The mayor is also asking restaurants to make food healthier by using fewer villainous ingredients  and grilling or baking food items instead of frying them: âThe Healthier Catering Commitment is a scheme that helps food businesses in London to provide healthier food to their customers. The scheme promotes a reduction in the consumption of fat  salt and sugar  and an increase in access to fruit and vegetables.â (To  his  credit   Khan  is reportedly trying to stop the number of pubs closing in the city each year. Two cheers for that.)
 Khan âs plan might actually make the problem worse. In 2008  Los Angeles set up new zoning rules that restrict the opening or expansion of âstand aloneâ restaurants in low-income areas of the city to combat health problems in those neighborhoods. But according to a 2015 RAND Corporation study  the rules havenât worked; in fact  after they were implemented  obesity rates for residents living in the targeted neighborhoods grew faster than in other parts of the city: âThe South Los Angeles fast food ban may have symbolic value  but it has had no measurable impact in improving diets or reducing obesity â said Roland Sturm  the lead author of the study. Business owners  who are usually smarter than politicians  figured out a way around the rules by opening smaller food stores or restaurants with limited seating. Shrewd Londoners could find similar loopholes in  Khan âs plan  perhaps by building a new restaurant 420 meters away from a school instead of 400.
answer:

no