We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

[EX Q]: (5) The Federal Gun Control Act of 1968, as amended by the Firearms Owners��� Protection Act of 1986, and the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act of 1993, provide comprehensive Federal regulations applicable in the District of Columbia as elsewhere.
[EX A]: Valid

[EX Q]: I'll freely admit that there is a larger jump between guns and nukes than knives and guns, but there is still a direct difference in lethality.
[EX A]: Valid

[EX Q]: ATF then obtains the sale records which every FFL dealer is required to maintain for every firearm and learns when the gun was received by the dealer and when and to whom the particular gun was sold.
[EX A]:
Valid