We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Example Input: Sent1: This appeared to me to be an argument that self defense cannot exist if a gun is used.
 Sent2: The question is whether or not it really matters if guns were used less for self defense and more for aggression.
Example Output: Not similar

Example Input: Sent1: We tell them what was meant when the law passed, but even these gun owners do not care what was meant, they only care what the law says!
 Sent2: Which passed the law requireing "smart guns", if they ever become available (right now they do not exist).
Example Output: Not similar

Example Input: Sent1: First you argued that the Second Amendment was a collective rights tool designed to ensure that each state had its own private militia.
 Sent2: Yeah, thing is that the second ammendment makes the point that guns should be allowed because a _well organised militia_ is an important tool for a nation.
Example Output:
Similar