In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: insult and non-insult. Insult is any lanugage or act that is disrespectful or scornfully abusive.

[EX Q]: Comment: All methods of reducing dental decay should be employed - It's something to consider.

Explain how, when water containing 0.7 mg/l fluoride ions has never been considered a medication, fluoridation opponents can claim the water treatment method is forced medication.  It would be like me claiming disinfection is forced poisoning and demanding that it be stopped.  Chlorine gas is a known chemical weapon, bleach is a strong poison that no one would want to drink, and studies on disinfection byproducts have shown they are poisonous at high exposure levels - would you want to drink a glass of chloroform?

Fluoridation opponents invent definitions to fit their agenda when there is absolutely no support for those claims.
[EX A]: Non-insult

[EX Q]: Comment: I'm surprised the crowd let him go alive.
[EX A]: Non-insult

[EX Q]: Comment: "SomeGuyThatWorksForPhotobucketOrAtLeastBlowsSomeoneThatWorksThere"
[EX A]:
Non-insult