In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Input: Consider Input: Comment: Hilarious. Or would be if it wasn't so scary. Right up there with Pope Gregory's women are good for ----ing and motherhood.

Output: Sexual-explicit


Input: Consider Input: Comment: Wow.  I reject what this man did wholeheartedly, but I have no desire to commit savage and bloody murder.

Output: Non-sexual-explicit


Input: Consider Input: Comment: It's not just millennials that think this is a bad joke. Approval ratings for both these hacks are way less than 50%. You have Teflon Hillary, who has been in a state of constant investigation by the FBI since the 70's, her time as a senator she cosigned / sponsored what 6 bills, all were recognition bills none where policy. Her position under the Obama administration, we all know how much of an epic failure that was. Then there's trump, who thinks his style of angry sarcastic attacking flip flopping your fired mentality is what will make America great again... They are both very bad jokes, so much so that You can't tell the difference between a Saturday Night Live show and a Live debate. The only sensible option out there is a libraterian, but idiotic voters will either not show up to the polls or choose the lessor of two evils under the theory of wasting their vote on a 3rd party. I personally believe the wasted vote is on the two jokes.


Output: Non-sexual-explicit