We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

[EX Q]: It doesnt say you have the right to shoot arms so it would be okay to ban bullets.
[EX A]: Valid

[EX Q]: The difference is the fact that at the time firearms were not prohibited on school grounds which lead to return fire coming from regular citizens and students in aid of the police on the scene.
[EX A]: Valid

[EX Q]: Your argument is that the Second Amendment was designed for purposes relating to the militia exclusively, and individuals being armed for matters not related to the government was never something the Founding Fathers felt necessary to protect.
[EX A]:
Valid