In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

[Q]: Comment: What a scumbag. Golovan (and nome) you ought to boot this pile of crap. He is a joke, just cause its technically legal it is immoral to pull this crap. The state has been broke for several years but this guy just kept on sucking the state tit dry.  A state employee would lose his job if they Pulled this crap. And basically that's what these clowns are...
[A]: Obscene


[Q]: Comment: "invaded and pushed out and have your culture changed by those different from you"

Followed by: "That said, we all are citizens of Planet Earth and we need to have some tolerance."

Invaded? Really? Did they come with guns and force you out of your homes? Did they prevent you from practicing your chosen religion?

You were NOT invaded and holy shit maybe reread your last line.
[A]: Obscene


[Q]: Comment: I think the issue of defending JG is NOT that she defended him, but HOW she defended him by steamrolling the victims so badly that they ended up more traumatized and worse, feeling like they were the accused.  She was a brutal asshole and interrogated without conscience.  Because of that alone she does not get any say in anything to do with women, she is the very essence of "women vs. women" and not "women helping women".  SHAME ON YOU GLOBE FOR PUBLISHING THIS STORY AND GIVING AN ASSHOLE OF SOCIETY A PLATFORM!
[A]:
Obscene