In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: insult and non-insult. Insult is any lanugage or act that is disrespectful or scornfully abusive.

[EX Q]: Comment: Former Alaskan? Good riddance! Clinton is a liar, thief, evil, vile, conniving, hateful, disgusting, despicable, foul-mouthed, sexual predator enabling piece of garbage.
[EX A]: Insult

[EX Q]: Comment: Ah.....so now someone is automatically a jerk if they don't stand for the anthem.
I suppose I am also a jerk since I don't get the warm fuzzies from daily recitation of the Pledge of Allegiance.
[EX A]: Insult

[EX Q]: Comment: Nothing uncivil? Really?

"Why do they give this woman the space and ink in this paper?"
"The Globe is an institutional apologist for Islam"
"Well sadly you now have a the same feeling that millions of mothers all across Europe and other parts of the world have been dealing with for years."
"we know that Islam does not accept non-Islamic viewpoints."
"The G&M clearly is publishing many articles written as propaganda pieces."
"Now you know how we have felt about you guys for 25 years."
"Indeed, it was difficult explaining to children the decapitation of Canadians Robert Hall & John Ridsdel by Islamic terrorists... "
"Funny how she doesn't realize that sending her children to an Islamic school and refusing to integrate into Western culture is the root cause of the problem."
"Oh look, a lefty terrorist apologist. "

You may not consider these to be "uncivil" but the overwhelming attitude is not one of respect, tolerance, or even honest disagreement. Can we not be better?
[EX A]:
Non-insult