In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Ex Input:
Comment: Do you see the paradox?  Gun people always scream about mental health...whenever tragedy occurs, we hear how it has absolutely nothing to do with the availability of guns and everything to do with mental health.  Then when people try to get at those mental health concerns before a tragedy - that gets decried as well.  Damned if you do, damned if you don't I guess.

Ex Output:
Obscene


Ex Input:
Comment: Are you saying only Nazis are anti-Semites?

"They do not threaten me, and I am happy to let them live"
"If somebody is swinging a knife in your direction - you're not just FEELING under threat, you ARE under threat"
Surely you must concede the word 'threaten' can be used in a context which does not imply physical violence. I was, quite rightly I feel, confused by your statement which said nothing about a knife.

But that then raises the question of how the Nazi (your term) physically threatened you by shouting, "Jews will not replace us!". Remember you are prepared to kill this person without there being any physical threat to you or anyone else. He is shouting - not swinging a knife.

The laws of self-defence are complex if that is what you are going to rely on for going about shooting people. As a self-defense teacher I have the obligation to warn you, you will need a good lawyer for a knife/gun case.

You keep raising more and more questions. What is an 'ethnic group'?

Ex Output:
Non-obscene


Ex Input:
Comment: So awesome to hear you all pulled thru this as a family. God is awesome and thank you for serving your country and thank you all! Damn good story!

Ex Output:

Obscene