In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Input: Consider Input: Comment: you don't get laid very often, do you?

Output: Non-obscene


Input: Consider Input: Comment: As a one more I ask you and others to type "Study links low intelligence and low I Q., to conservatism and prejudice". And think of what is making you and others angry. I see angry voters voted in more of the same, and kept getting b.s.'d into voting for more of the same for a few election cycles. Now the same angry voters are really mad and are going to vote for another snake oil salesman who'll really finish the job the angry voters are raising hell about. What's that saying about being able to fool some people some of the time? With some it is all of the time.

Output: Non-obscene


Input: Consider Input: Comment: Canada's next big economic pitch?

You must be joking.

Or no, just as out of it as Justin, who wants to turn Canada into Venezuela-North, so Canadians can feed themselves by scrounging though dumpsters.

Agriculture has been so abused in this country with taxes, regulations, and runaway costs (and now, think carbon taxes) that most farmers are old, with their kids not willing to take the hard work and abuse,--and they are looking for ways to cash out.

Venezuela had a good agriculture sector, and so did Zimbabwe (former Rhodesia), before these countries were blighted by socialism. Canada is fast going down the same path.


Output: Non-obscene