Given the Question and Answer pair, detect whether the answer is acceptable or not. Denote acceptable answer as "yes", otherwise denote as "no". An acceptable answer is consistent with the context in question, detailed, long, and uses general knowledge of English. Answers that are not definite and suggest a variety of options are not acceptable answers.

Q: Question: There are many English words with silent letters, words like gnome or island that are spelt with consonants that aren't pronounced, but are there any words that work the other way round, with a pronunciation that includes extra sounds or syllables that are not in the spelling? I can't think of any real examples, hence this question, but a made-up example would be if gnome were spelt nome but pronounced with a g at the start. Or if people started pronouncing offer as "ofter" as a sort of weird parallel to after. Note: I don't mean words like rough, where the f sound is spelt gh, because in those cases the spelling does still include letters (however seemingly illogical) for each of the sounds. 
Answer: The name "Stephen" is pronounced as "Steven", that is, "ph" is pronounced "v", which is unexpected. Some notes: "ph" is normally pronounced "f", and both "v" and "f" are labiodental fricatives, so this strange pronunciation doesn't come entirely out of the blue. The name can also be spelt "Steven" (e.g. Steven Tyler), thus matching the pronunciation. Admittedly, this is not exactly what you are asking for (it's like "colonel", where "lo" is pronounced as an "r"), but since you consider colonel "in an adjacent neighbourhood", you might be interested in "Stephen" as well.

A: no
****
Q: Question: Is there a single word to describe birds that can fly? Am I struggling to think of a word because the default notion of a bird is that it can fly? So we generally only need to differentiate the ones that can't fly. I've seen the term "winged" in a few google searches, but to my mind an ostrich is winged, but it is also flightless. I guess I'm looking for the word you'd put into this blank: Penguins are flightless because they cannot fly. Ostriches are flightless because they cannot fly. Pigeons are ____ because they can fly. 
Answer: In German we have it easy: 'flugfahig' and 'flugunfahig'. Deepl gave me this translation So it might be airworthy you are searching for, though it may only be used for contraptions and not for animals.

A: no
****
Q: Question: I've been looking around the Internet. Some websites say that foods is incorrect but others say it is correct. 
Answer: Food in its commonest sense is a non-countable noun, with all the effects of that. It's already a plural. You would eat "some food" not "a food". You would say "less food" not "fewer foods". However, there is a less common usage where "a food" means "a type of food": "Cheese is a food made from milk" ... and in this form, you can pluralise it ... "Italy is the source of many delicious foods -- pizza, pasta, salami, biscotti..." For comparison, think of "a people" - Are there meta-plurals beyond "peoples"?.

A:
yes
****