In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Q: Comment: I'm guessing  the "mess" you're talking about is the one in your pants, as you've probably guessed that your Orange hero lives to pander to paranoid sycophants such as yourself.

A: Non-obscene
****
Q: Comment: well done? how about ,, about bloody time!! they cried and opposed it when harper was Pm,, now for the photo op, not so much!!

A: Obscene
****
Q: Comment: The bishops object to ".. new forms of discrimination against people of faith".  Lets see if I have got this.  The "new forms of discrimination..." are the laws that won't let them discriminate against others.  Based on reasons of faith.  In public market places and in hiring and firing people from jobs for which they are selected based on their job skills and irrespective of their personal religious beliefs.

We can't do this except within the confines of the religious organization itself and where the actions do not infringe on others acting in public spaces.  If the religious group acts only within the confines of its own group, that is one thing.  Once that faith is taken outside the confines of the religious group, respect is a two-way street.  People of faith have to respect that space in which they interact with people of different or no faith.  

Chaput and Lori - if it is okay for you to discriminate against LGBT people, why can't others legally do the same to you/Catholics?

A:
Non-obscene
****