The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the self-need strategy, otherwise output No. self-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to create a personal need for an item in the negotiation, such as by pointing out that the participant sweats a lot to show preference towards water packages.

Context: 'I will offer 3 water to you! You will maybe need more food with that much exercise? How about 2 food? I really need that extra firewood. Remember that the Catskills probably has some extra wood around.' 'That works for me, you can have the firewood then!' 'Alright that sounds great. '
Utterance: 'Great! so, for you, 2 wood, 1 food, me 3 water 2 food'
No

Context: 'Ok, do you have any interest in any fire wood?' 'I do need firewood, we cook over open flames. 😮How you get 2 water, 1 food and 1 firewood?' 'How about if I give you 3 food for 3 waters, and then we split the firewood?'
Utterance: 'I do require at least one water, hiking is very physical demanding. Also there are 3 firewoods?'
Yes

Context: 'Well I was thinking you could get all the extra firewood and work on the group meal and bonfire for friday night' 'I like the sound of getting the firewood, but I can't just accept no food or water.' 'I'll give you one of the extra food so you have a little extra to cook for everyone but I'm really gonna need all that extra water, it's going to be really hot this weekend and the folks at the capsite get to sit in the shade all day'
Utterance: 'Now we are making progress. But come on, I will need at least one water to make sure I'm hydrated. I wouldn't want to get heatstroke out in the woods.'

Yes