The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the self-need strategy, otherwise output No. self-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to create a personal need for an item in the negotiation, such as by pointing out that the participant sweats a lot to show preference towards water packages.

Ex Input:
Context: 'Hello, I'm hopping I could grab most of the food, I have a lot of hungry mouths to feed.' 'Hi - I can understand that. I have quite a few mouths to feed as well' 'hmmm, well what are you looking to get'
Utterance: 'Well, I think that for us staying warm is more important than having extra food. What if I took extra fire wood and you took extra food?'

Ex Output:
Yes


Ex Input:
Context: 'I am a big guy, so I will need some more food, how about you give me an extra food while you hold on to two' 'I can't give you all the water if you take one of the food, I'm very sorry.  I could take 2 of the food and 2 of the water if we do it that way.  I really need cooking supplies if I want this trip to be productive for me - it's why I was coming.' 'That wouldn't work for me, I will be going hiking during camping, so I need all of the water I can get'
Utterance: 'Well then maybe we can just do a trade, the water to you and the food to me.  And if I got two of the firewood, I'd have plenty of time to just boil and purify some riverwater instead'

Ex Output:
No


Ex Input:
Context: 'Nice. That's okay with me. You get 3 waters and a I get 3 firewood' 'I was actually saying you get 2 firewood and I get 3 waters. Then you could have 2 food and I get 1 food.' 'That's seems fair to me since we all need food to eat'
Utterance: 'Okay, I'm glad we were able to work something out!'

Ex Output:

No