Based on the given context, craft a common-sense question, especially those that are LONG, INTERESTING, and COMPLEX. The goal is to write questions that are easy for humans and hard for AI machines! To create such questions, here are some suggestions: A. What may (or may not) be the plausible reason for an event? B. What may (or may not) happen before (or after, or during) an event? C. What may (or may not) be a plausible fact about someone (or something)? D. What may (or may not) happen if an event happens (or did not happen)? You can also create other types of questions. DO NOT make your question answerable without looking at the context, or question of which the correct answer can be directly extracted from the context. DO NOT ask a question that requires very specialized knowledge that is not common sense. DO NOT ask too simple or too short questions. Your question must be related to the context and answerable with common sense. Try to add more variations and complexity to the questions.

Input: Consider Input: Context: The chip leader maniac bets $ 35 , and the rest of the action folds to me . Here 's where it gets interesting . I KNOW he overplays small pocket pairs all the time , but , sometimes he has a real hand .

Output: In what sort of game is chip leader maniac betting $ 35 ?


Input: Consider Input: Context: If you want to see the scrapbooking that I did this weekend then check out the pictures in my Scrapbooking photo gallery . After the weekend I got busy at work but made sure to take time to call my mom for a couple of days . My parent 's anniversary was May 27th and , although my dad has been gone for almost 12 years , I always call her to let her know that I am thinking about her . THEN ... her birthday is the next day !.

Output: What will the narrator do after calling her mom the second time ?


Input: Consider Input: Context: A good book adaptation is like pornography -- I know it when I see it . I think it helps when the people doing the adaptation have a deep love for the original material and a strong vision of what they 'd like to do with it . Sometimes , that vision clashes with the original material ( as in Starship Troopers , where Paul Verhoeven used over - the - top parody to make a film that had the opposite message of the novel -- and for the record , I liked the film better than the book ) . Sometimes , that vision humanizes a very cold and analytical novel ( as in the George Clooney adaptation of Solaris , which I also loved , and not just for Clooney 's butt ) .


Output: What might I mean when I referenced George Clooney 's butt ?