We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

[EX Q]: Sent1: Do you think that private companies should be able to restrict freedom of speech as well as any other parts of the constitution?
 Sent2: The medium of 'free speech' has changed, but that does not affect that free speech should still exist - just as with the other constitutional points (with a few exceptions, if you believe Bush).
[EX A]: Not similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: Guns don't kill people, if they did, they would go to jail for murder- not the murderers.
 Sent2: people who want to kill, will kill if you ban guns, they will kill with knives, or something else.
[EX A]: Not similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: Not only will the criminals still have access to guns, but they will also have the added knowledge that either the person they intend to rob does not have a gun or they are breaking the law.
 Sent2: They do not have the expressed, enumerated power to pass any law regarding guns in the constitution.
[EX A]:
Not similar