In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: threat and non-threat. Threat is a statement that someone will be hurt or harmed, especially if the person does not do something in particular.
--------
Question: Comment: Like his late dead daddy, JT must be anti-semitic.  He has remained silent to the Montreal guy who says we should punch Zionist Jews in the face.  If he promises to really do it, I would go to Montreal and he can punch me.  Guess I could punch him back.

Answer: Threat


Question: Comment: aaa poor liberal paid trolling sheep, cant stand it that alberta is about to get rid of the left after the years of stupid harmfull policies and get back to prosperity under torys as they had for decades! boo hoo hoo, keep crying cause ontario is next then federally in 19, they we can get Canada back working and progressing again!  oh btw it is you leftards that are the biggots,, you come up with the nonsense programs based on colour all the time!

Answer: Non-threat


Question: Comment: This whining does nothing more than reinforce my long-standing impression that the Canadian Federation of Independent Business and other groups of that ilk are nothing more than a pack of slogan-chanting parasites, eagerly pandering to their members' worst instincts in order to keep the annual dues rolling in.

 What is the purpose of income sprinkling? How well does it achieve that purpose? Is it the best way of achieving that purpose?

 What is the purpose of a lower tax rate on passive income? How well does it achieve that purpose? Is it the best way of achieving that purpose?

 If the CFIB can answer those questions in some kind of logical and compelling manner, I might be forced to reconsider my opinion of them. But I'm not holding my breath.

Answer:
Non-threat