Given a document, generate a short title of the document. The title should convey the main idea/event/topic about which the document is being written. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

Input: Consider Input: The most common strain of influenza this year is H3N2 (A)  which was covered by this yearâs flu vaccine. While strains can still mutate in individual cases and render the vaccine ineffective for some people  the flu vaccine can also help lessen the severity of illness in some of these cases  said  Dr. Robert Citronberg  infectious disease physician with Advocate Health Care .
At Lutheran General Hospital in Park Ridge   Citronberg  has seen a steady influx of patients with the flu  which presents  itself  with symptoms including high fever  chills  muscle aches and fatigue   he  said.
âPeople who have genuinely true influenza say that they feel like they got run over by a truck â  Citronberg  said.
An anti-viral prescription medication known as Tamiflu is available to both children adults suffering from the flu. Doctors recommend plenty of rest  drinking fluids and staying away from other people  since people with the flu are typically contagious for about seven days   Citronberg  said.

Output: Flu season hitting earlier with dozens more outbreaks â and more severe symptoms


Input: Consider Input: Hillary Clinton . (Brendan Smialowski/AFP via Getty Images)
Thereâs not much to do when youâre home for the holidays  so this season some have decided to fill up their free time by melting down over  a video that snipes at Hillary Clinton .
âTake up a hobby in the new year â a young writer holding a glass of champagne says to  Clinton  in the short  which Vanity Fair magazineâs âHiveâ vertical produced as part of a series proposing âresolutionsâ to various political figures. âVolunteer work  knitting  improv comedy â literally anything that will keep you from running again.â
Well  no.  The video  had sexist overtones  and the lameness of the jokes made them all the more offensive.  It âs harder to plead comedic license when your comedy isnât funny. But  Clinton  occupies an odd place in the political sphere:  She  was so close to the Oval Office for so long leading up to 2016 that  her  heir apparentness discouraged potential challengers. A career candidate from a Democratic dynasty held little appeal for anyone dissatisfied with the party status quo then  and will hold even less in 2020. Itâs not surprising that some cringe to think  Clinton âs shadow could still loom over races to come.
So then why resurrect  her ?
Although ride-or-die  Clinton  supporters werenât they only ones who took umbrage at the knitting comment  it was that cohort who turned particularly hysterical. These all-in  Clinton  fans seem determined to keep their candidate relevant: Even if they arenât calling on  her  to run again  they want  her  at the center of the political conversation. Every faux pas of President Trumpâs becomes an opportunity for Clinton-would-have-been-bettering. No kidding  she  would  yet thatâs neither here nor there when it comes to countering the damage Trump does every day  or to cultivating a roster of candidates who will win the seats to turn things around.
[Vanity Fair staffers provide snotty  condescending life tips for  Hillary Clinton ]
But more perplexing than the multitude of Clinton crusaders who are still crusading are the  Clinton  critics who continue to place the defeated candidate center-stage in their narratives even as they shriek that they want  her  out. This  besides its blatant unfunniness  may be the greatest failing of Vanity Fairâs ill-advised advice video. The staffers have devoted one minute and three seconds to telling  Clinton  to go away  and all theyâve succeeding in doing is bringing  her  right back.
This is âWhat Happened?â week on repeat. Journalists lambasted  Clinton  for re-litigating the 2016 primary in writing  and then they did the exact same thing. Over and over. They rolled their eyes at  her  play for attention  cash  catharsis or whatever else it was â and then they helped  her  find all of the above.
And itâs not only professional pundits who canât seem to give  Clinton  up. For every amateur commentator or plain old civilian re-upping a  Clinton  campaign talking point on Twitter  thereâs someone ready to fire back with an explanation of why  Clinton  is the worst politician of all time. This goes on  every day  more than a year after the election and almost a year after the man who beat  Clinton  walked into the White House.
Hours before the Vanity Fair outrage  Trump sent a Boxing Day Twitter missive from Mar-a-Lago in his usual style: âThey used this Crooked Hillary pile of garbage as the basis for going after the Trump Campaign!â he concluded  harping on his beef with  Clinton  yet again. Which prompted all his critics  left  very left and right alike  to tell him to get over it. Perhaps they should  too.

Output: The Vanity Fair Hillary Clinton video isn't worth the fuss


Input: Consider Input: On Tuesday  the chief of the National Security Agency  Admiral Michael Rogers  said a ânation-stateââmeaning Russiaâhad intervened in the 2016 elections âto achieve a specific effect.â He was referring to the hacking of Democratic targets and the release of the stolen information via WikiLeaks. And on Wednesday  Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) called for a congressional investigation of Russian meddling in the campaign. On Thursday  the call for a Capitol Hill inquiry gathered momentum  with  Rep. Elijah Cummings (D-Md.)   the ranking Democrat on the House government oversight committee  publicly urging the committeeâs chairman  Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah)  to launch such a probe.
In a letter sent to Chaffetz and released publicly   Cummings  noted that  he  and Chaffetz had discussed opening such an investigation on Wednesday and that Chaffetz had told  him   he  was âopen to considering such an investigationâ but wanted  Cummings  to âshow the evidenceâ that Russia had tried to influence the election.  Cummings  did so in this letter  citing Rogersâ statement.  Cummings  also pointed to a statement issued on October 7 by the Office of Director of National Intelligence and the Department of Homeland Security  which said  âThe U.S. Intelligence Community (USIC) is confident that the Russian Government directed the recent compromises of e-mails from US persons and institutions  including from US political organizations. The recent disclosures of alleged hacked e-mails on sites like DCLeaks.com and WikiLeaks and by the Guccifer 2.0 online persona are consistent with the methods and motivations of Russian-directed efforts. These thefts and disclosures are intended to interfere with the US election process. Such activity is not new to Moscowâthe Russians have used similar tactics and techniques across Europe and Eurasia  for example  to influence public opinion there. We believe  based on the scope and sensitivity of these efforts  that only Russiaâs senior-most officials could have authorized these activities.â
 Cummings  also noted that House Speaker Paul Ryan has said  âRussia is a global menace led by a devious thug. Putin should stay out of this election.â
In his letter to Chaffetz   Cummings  contended that this investigation should be a bipartisan endeavor to ensure the security of American democracy:
 Cummings  proposed that the oversight committee immediately request âa classified briefing from the Intelligence Communityâ and start âa robust investigation designed to identify specific recommendations for actions that our country can take to respond to these attacks and safeguard against similar attacks in the future.â
Here âs Cummings â full letter:


Output: Senior House Democrat Calls for Congressional Probe of Russian Meddling in 2016 Election â Mother Jones