In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine the neutral choice based on your inference from the statement and your commonsense knowledge. The neutral choice is a sentence that neither agrees nor disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3', corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence. If sentence X agrees with sentence Y, one's correctness follows from the other one. If sentence X disagrees with sentence Y, they can not be correct at the same time.

Q: Statement: okay well um  thanks for hearing me ramp i guess  all right nice talking with you Choices: 1. Thanks for listening; the conversation was nice. 2. The conversation was pleasant even though I rambled on. 3. The conversation was awkward since no one said much.

A: 2
****
Q: Statement: For purposes of this simulation, the amount of allowances banked from 2002 through 2006 was calculated as the simple difference between the reference case projections and the actual emission trajectory of each scenario. Choices: 1. The simulation incorrectly calculated allowances backed. 2. The simulation did not calculate anything. 3. The simulation calculated allowances backed.

A: 1
****
Q: Statement: The heart of Asakusa, in turn, is Sensoji (also known as the Asakusa Kannon temple). Choices: 1. Sensoji is not the heart of Asakusa 2. Sensoji is the heart of Asakusa. 3. Sensoji is very popular

A:
3
****