We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

You argue that people cannot be trusted with guns, because they might injure themselves in accidents (hence the 4.46 figure).
Valid

First off, explain exactly how the militia groups qualify as unconstitutional.
Valid

(We all know those missile launchers, machine guns, and grenades are soooooooo easy to buy from your local gun shop, huh!)

Valid