In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Comment: My original post to which you responded, was in the context of revolution. Did you miss that?
It seems to me that you're filling in some blanks with fantasy. I have no intention of starting a civil war, a revolution, of invading anyone's home, or killing someone because his or her political points of view differ from mine. In the light of recent events, it seems that it's more likely progressives who kill their ideological adversaries.
However, should there be a civil war between progressives and conservatives, I'd be supporting the conservatives in all ways of which I'm capable. I sincerely hope it never comes to that.
To be really clear, I do consider progressivism to be a social/political cancer that if allowed to grow will eventually kill the host.
Non-sexual-explicit

Comment: Your are so right this man who was sexually abused as a child by his father,should have seeked help. It sounds like the environment he grew up in was a pretty healthy one. full of adults who would have been happy to take him to therapy as a child, to help him cope with the life long scars and visual and physical memories of his body being invaded and abused by a adult man as a child. We could never even begin to imagine the emotional turmoil sexual abuse has on a child. It's the systems fault for not protecting our children! For not providing health and mental care to our children who survive sexual assault. For not showing our children that what was done to their bodies to their lives was wrong! instead the abusers get a slap on the hand, and a stern "don't do it again". Read the article click on the links and you will see that the man who attacked theses rapist was too abused as a child,he was faild by the system. That is who to blame.
Sexual-explicit

Comment: You're ignorant of the Church's practice in the past.  Women in abusive relationships were routinely counseled by their priests to stick it out.... this is not ingnorance on the woman's part, but obedience to an authority.  This is well documented and fortunately the Church has corrected that error in praxis and thank goodness woman began listening to themselves

Non-sexual-explicit