In this task, you are given the abstract of a research paper. Your task is to generate a summary of this abstract. Your summary should not be very short, but it's better if it's not more than 30 words.

Q: We present a representation for describing transition models in complex uncertain domains using relational rules.   For any action, a rule selects a set of relevant objects and computes a distribution over properties of just those objects in the resulting state given their properties in the previous state.   An iterative greedy algorithm is used to construct a set of deictic references that determine which objects are relevant in any given state.    Feed-forward neural networks are used to learn the transition distribution on the relevant objects' properties.   This strategy is demonstrated to be both more versatile and more sample efficient than learning a monolithic transition model in a simulated domain in which a robot pushes stacks of objects on a cluttered table.

A: A new approach that learns a representation for describing transition models in complex uncertaindomains using relational rules. 
****
Q: We describe a novel way of representing a symbolic knowledge base (KB) called a sparse-matrix reified KB.   This representation enables neural modules that are fully differentiable, faithful to the original semantics of the KB, expressive enough to model multi-hop inferences, and scalable enough to use with realistically large KBs. The sparse-matrix reified KB can be distributed across multiple GPUs, can scale to tens of millions of entities and facts, and is orders of magnitude faster than naive sparse-matrix implementations.   The reified KB enables very simple end-to-end architectures to obtain competitive performance on several benchmarks representing two families of tasks: KB completion, and learning semantic parsers from denotations.

A: A scalable differentiable neural module that implements reasoning on symbolic KBs.
****
Q: Most existing defenses against adversarial attacks only consider robustness to L_p-bounded distortions. In reality, the specific attack is rarely known in advance and adversaries are free to modify images in ways which lie outside any fixed distortion model; for example, adversarial rotations lie outside the set of L_p-bounded distortions. In this work, we advocate measuring robustness against a much broader range of unforeseen attacks, attacks whose precise form is unknown during defense design.

 We propose several new attacks and a methodology for evaluating a defense against a diverse range of unforeseen distortions. First, we construct novel adversarial JPEG, Fog, Gabor, and Snow distortions to simulate more diverse adversaries. We then introduce UAR, a summary metric that measures the robustness of a defense against a given distortion.   Using UAR to assess robustness against existing and novel attacks, we perform an extensive study of adversarial robustness. We find that evaluation against existing L_p attacks yields redundant information which does not generalize to other attacks; we instead recommend evaluating against our significantly more diverse set of attacks. We further find that adversarial training against either one or multiple distortions fails to confer robustness to attacks with other distortion types.   These results underscore the need to evaluate and study robustness against unforeseen distortions.

A:
We propose several new attacks and a methodology to measure robustness against unforeseen adversarial attacks.
****