In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

[EX Q]: Comment: Max Sword blatant nepotism is disturbing and I'm happy that all this attention and scrutiny is curbing Hawaii's back scratching culture of bribery and corruption...at least in this case. Sword's wife WORKED for Chapman. Conflict of interest much.
[EX A]: Non-sexual-explicit

[EX Q]: Comment: Now I know how you Trumpers felt about Obama, kind of fun actually...Lock him up, Lock him up...#MAGA
[EX A]: Non-sexual-explicit

[EX Q]: Comment: I was surprised that Shaw did not pick up some of the crumbs in the recent BCE-MTS deal.  The government was desperate to force BCE to give free stuff to a 4th wireless provider. But Shaw dropped out, and they had to find some other non-player (Xplornet) to be the beneficiary of free stuff.  Shaw dropped the ball.
This is what happens in  family-run business.  Shaw needs professional management instead of a family member at the helm.  But won't happen as long as the old man is still the Chairman of the Board.
[EX A]:
Non-sexual-explicit