We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Q: Sent1: In every state that retains the death penalty, jurors have the option of sentencing convicted capital murderers to life in prison without the possibility of parole.
 Sent2: Acutally, long ago, the executioner was a convict also sentenced to death.

A: Not similar
****
Q: Sent1: One way that would make me happy with the death penalty is if the person was killed in the same way as the person that they murdered.
 Sent2: Capital punishment is killing someone as a punishment for a crime they committed.

A: Not similar
****
Q: Sent1: If they don't want to kill an innocent person, stick to life in prison.
 Sent2: You make it sound as though if someone is innocent, of anything, they should be killed.

A:
Not similar
****