In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Input: Consider Input: Comment: maybe  if  you  kiss  my  ass  I'll put  a  good  word  in  for  you  at  the  welfare  office,  moocher.

Output: Obscene


Input: Consider Input: Comment: Without going through the legal channels to change how the pay out is done, this is flat out illegal. 

So instead of local businesses and citizens infusing and stimulating OUR economy, he wants to pour 700M into a bucket with holess in it.

Blatant thievery. Gov. Walker.

You shame the office of Govenor and Alaska. You are guilty of HURTING the innocent and poor and taking that which does not belong to you to take.

Output: Non-obscene


Input: Consider Input: Comment: "The worst crimes of all have been committed by al qaeda, ISIL, al shabaab, boko haram et cetera, against Sunni and Shiia Muslims, a point not lost on Muslims, but beyond the grasp of the liberal-left of the west."

You're going to have to parse that for me. Please explain how a prima facie discriminatory ban against all Muslims from seven countries is somehow justified by the fact that terrorist extremists also perpetrate violence against Muslims from the two largest sects?


Output: Non-obscene