Categorize the comment on the basis of severe toxicity. If the comment is severely toxic output Yes, otherwise output No.

Example Input: Maybe Lisa the Liar should have thought about the people of King Cove when she was helping get Secretary Jewell confirmed.
Crocodile tears from a liberal senator.
Example Output: Yes

Example Input: The truth has absolutely nothing to do with mercury, the Spotted newt or the environment. The Left, their constituents nor the judges have or will ever read the EIR. The idiots on YouTube who dredge for two years and yield a measly 15 ounces and drools, the Asshole that claimed 70 mIles of the Klamath for his cult of methadone junkies who insulted the Karuk who opened the casino vault. That same dip shit that DID NOT put his dredge in the water in 2015 to show his defiance by getting arrested only too hide in the trees while two of his believers did and then he goes on YouTube begging for financial support not without mentioning he's a ex-navy seal and Vietnam like the douchebag he is. And the dumb shits who dredge peoples birdbaths who bought bunk claims they got on Ebay in busy shipping lanes because "I HAVE A RIGHT TOO". All on YouTube. This is all the source they need to sell their agenda. Us claim owners with the real gold, who don't show and tell are coming to clean house go home
Example Output: Yes

Example Input: If Public Schools are doing their job putting condoms on bananas as early as sixth grade I fail to wonder how aside from a refresher course  in banana prepping is going to make a big difference. No more "mystery of life" is going to happen on your honey moon, by the time you are 7th grade you know it all. I fail to surmise how additional funds can can benefit such women who are older, who put condoms on bananas, and still didn't get a clue. Are we all now responsible for the dumb chick who put a condom on the banana but not the phallus?  Are we really all responsible for the mistakes of other people? And why are we?
Example Output:
Yes