Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.

Ex Input:
Who is directing Anna MacKinnon to push this pet issue every year? It would be nice to see time not wasted on these menutia bills when serious business is at hand.

Ex Output:
No


Ex Input:
Riversong, please cite the SCOTUS ruling you believe most supports your claim that the federal government has the right to own more than half of the land in the State of Oregon? 

The Tenth Amendment states: "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people." That plainly establishes a requirement for indisputable explicitness in the Constitution regarding federal rights. If there is a question at all, the tie — the uncertainty — MUST go in favor of "the States respectively, or to the people," NOT the federal government.

We now have a dead man and several imprisoned people because they dared to ask a reasonable Constitutional question regarding their rights and States rights, and their reasonable question has not been answered by the government. 

How many more dead people do you require before you will do the work necessary to amend the U.S. Constitution?

Ex Output:
Yes


Ex Input:
If I were a city planner, I'd say your behavior is bordering on criminal. Watching squirrels run after corn cobs ... sounds perverted. ;-)

Ex Output:

No