In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Q: Comment: Senator McCain needs to be grounded.

A: Non-sexual-explicit
****
Q: Comment: Luckily Trump will shut this idiot up once and for all.
Lord knows Junior can't. 
Platitudes, climate change rhetoric along with a few epithets won't take out your enemy.
Maybe Junior could carbon tax kim juck muck to oblivion like he is doing to us.

Saturday Night Live needs an MC -  kim juck muck would do fine

A: Non-sexual-explicit
****
Q: Comment: You don't seem to understand. It is easy for you to call people names such as fool, hypocrite, liar; compare them to Nazi war criminals; accuse them of committing one of the deady sins, etc from the safety of a combox. Would you do that in a face to face discussion where you might be forcefully reminded that such behaviour will not be tolerated?
I have free will and I consciously and freely choose to accept the Magisterium as the teaching of Our Lord just as you consciously and freely choose not to accept it.
Because you disagree with me, I don't call you a liar or a hypocrite, etc, why can't you extend the same courtesy to me and others?

A:
Non-sexual-explicit
****