In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Example Input: Comment: Rats jumping On to the ship.
Example Output: Non-sexual-explicit

Example Input: Comment: It was terrorism people. The administration does not want to look bad right before the election. Obama is more worried about his "legacy" then fighting a battle that has come to our shores. How many more attacks till he admits and says the words "Islamist Extremists." They gave crap to Trump (sorry tRump wavemaker) for using the word "bomb". Hillery ( sorry hIllery ) acted just like Obama. Obama says if you don't vote for HRC you will tarnish his legacy. When do you admit we are at war? When it is over and we lost? Our leaders better get their heads out of their asses PDQ.
Example Output: Sexual-explicit

Example Input: Comment: "In fact, how are we, through a 2016 lens, actually moving away from rape culture if we refuse to entertain the possibility that a woman may actually have wanted sex – particularly in a time when women’s bodies were even less their own than now?"

I'm glad to see that the idea of a "rape culture" may finally be coming to a close. It is sex that most men want, not to rape for it, and that original song represents how that could come about - if one wants to see the woman as really wanting sex. I tend to think, however, that there were good reasons why she wouldn't - and still are, in today's world. 

When we say that women didn't connect with their own bodies in that era, but were repressed, I wonder now how true that thought is. Today, women are pressured to be non-repressed, when the reality is that sometimes, and for some women, they really might not want to. Yet women are encouraged to be 'adult' by becoming sexualized - by having sex. How great is that? Ask, who benefits, and how.
Example Output:
Sexual-explicit