Given a paragraph about cooking, and a set of conversational questions and answers about the paragraph, say whether the passage contains sufficient information to answer the follow-up question. Say Yes if it is answerable; otherwise, say No. The paragraph has the prefix 'CONTEXT:'. Each conversation question has a prefix `Q:` followed by the answer prefix `A:`, and the follow-up question has a prefix `FOLLOWUP_Q:`.

Example Input: CONTEXT: Generally speaking, maple syrup will work fine in any recipe that calls for honey. They may have slightly different viscosities and water content, but that could be true between two honeys as well, so I wouldn't worry about it a lot. The only thing I think you really have to consider is whether the flavor of maple syrup is appealing in the dish you would substitute it in. In most cases, I think it will be fine, especially if the dish would have worked well with a dark, fully flavored honey. You might also like to try sorghum syrup, molasses, or agave nectar as other possible replacements.  <sep>  Q: Can I replace honey with maple syrup in recipes that require honey? A: Generally speaking, maple syrup will work fine in any recipe that calls for honey  Q: Can I use it in Honey Shortbread Biscuits? A: The only thing I think you really have to consider is whether the flavor of maple syrup is appealing in the dish you would substitute it in  Q: I wonder if a pear and almond tart would taste OK with maple syrup? A: think it will be fine, especially if the dish would have worked well with a dark, fully flavored honey  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: I wonder how chocolate chip cookies would taste with maple syrup?
Example Output: No

Example Input: CONTEXT: A chinoise will not--I speak from daily experience--filter out vanilla seeds. A coffee filter would, but my question is: why on earth would you bother? It's annoying to do (and depending on what the product is, filtering through a coffee filter would ensure you lose other things), and seeing actual vanilla seeds in the final product tells your guests that you are using real vanilla beans, not extract.Professional kitchens do not, generally speaking, attempt to remove the seeds for the reasons noted above.@stephenmacdonald, most dessert recipes that call for a fine mesh strainer do so because there is the possibility of chunky things ending up in the product. In the case of that recipe, I would guess it is to prevent chunks of undissolved gelatine from ending up in the final dessert.  <sep>  Q: Can I filter out vanilla bean seeds? A: A chinoise will not--I speak from daily experience--filter out vanilla seeds. A coffee filter would, but my question is: why on earth would you bother  Q: When I use seeds I scrape out of vanilla beans in my desserts, it always leaves black specks. ###It doesn't seem to alter the taste, but it's not as pretty as professional works. A: seeing actual vanilla seeds in the final product tells your guests that you are using real vanilla beans, not extract  Q: That makes sense. I'd rather my panna cotta be pristine and white, though. A: Professional kitchens do not, generally speaking, attempt to remove the seeds for the reasons noted above  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Oh, really? Do they use imitation extract? I don't recall seeing the bits of seeds in restaurant food.
Example Output: No

Example Input: CONTEXT: It's hard to say exactly how long it will take to overprove because there are many variables involved - the amount of yeast, salt and enrichment in your dough, and the room temperature for example. However, it should be fine to ferment overnight, if you cover it well and put it in the fridge.  <sep>  Q: How long will a bread ferment last before it is no good? A: It's hard to say exactly how long it will take to overprove because there are many variables involved  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: What are some of the variablees?
Example Output:
Yes