In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: toxic and non-toxic. Toxicity is defiend as anything that is rude, disrespectful, or unreasonable that would make someone want to leave a converation.

[EX Q]: Comment: I agree with this author completely. In the great battle for equal treatment under the law patience will only get you so far. Eventually you realize that power never relinquishes control of its own accord, it must always be challenged, resisted, and opposed.

On the eve of Donald Trump's inauguration we're being told that his victory was the result of white people who had decided that enough is enough when it came to their economic distress, caused by policies enacted by people they supported (something they now willfully ignore) but blamed on immigrants, people of color, Muslims, and various other "others." 

And now on MLK Day we're supposed to buy into the myth that their economic distress is in any way comparable to the kind of oppression endured for generations by black people living in the south, first as slaves and later as second-class citizens with no voting rights or any other rights. 

As a white male, I don't think so. Delusion is not countered with patience.
[EX A]: Non-toxic

[EX Q]: Comment: Louie is living proof Michele obama had sex with a RAT
[EX A]: Toxic

[EX Q]: Comment: My wife and I have had a completely different experience with OHSU.  Even though we live in Eugene, we go to OHSU's Casey Eye Institute for my wife's eye care after the egregiously incompetent "care" she received here in Eugene (missed retinal detachment, insisting that my wife was "imagining things").  OHSU's Casey Eye Institute has far better facilities and staff compared to what is available in Eugene.
[EX A]:
Non-toxic