In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence can be inferred from the statement. Incorrect choices change the meaning in important ways or have details that are not mentioned in the statement. Indicate your answer as 1,2, or 3 corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.

Statement: The auditor should also verify that the agency has defined its needs and requirements to support its mission, and that those requirements continue to be valid as the acquisition progresses through contract award and contract management. Choices:  1. The agency defining it's needs should never be verified by the auditor. 2. The agency defining it's needs should also be verified by the auditor. 3. The agency defining it's needs should also be verified by the auditor, because he can make sure there are no mistakes.
2

Statement: In effect, Nixon's misdeeds () so dwarf Clinton's--even the most severe charges of suborning perjury--that Republicans could wind up bollixed. Choices:  1. All things considered, Nixon's mistakes are bigger than Clinton's. 2. All things considered, Nixon should face a stiffer punishment than Clinton. 3. In effect Clinton's sins are greater than Nixon's.
1

Statement: Furthermore, the protocols will help to ensure the consistency, fairness, and effectiveness of interactions between GAO and the agencies with which it works. Choices:  1. The protocols were put into place at the beginning of this year. 2. The work between GAO and the agencies it works with could benefit from the protocols. 3. The protocols will have very negative effects  on the interactions between GAO and the agencies.

2