We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

Input: Consider Input: I implied that there are people with guns that are nuts, not that all gun owners are nuts...

Output: Valid


Input: Consider Input: Another reason kalifornia's ban on open carry being wrong is the application of McDonald into the 14th Amendment of Civil Rights which bars States from infringing in any way on the right to keep and bear arms.

Output: Valid


Input: Consider Input: Where is your true sympathy for folks like Suzanna Gratia Hupp who were disarmed by government edicts (unconstitutionally) while we arm our enemies of America and gun grabber/anti-Constitutionalists?


Output: Valid