Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
--------
Question: "What Zuckerberg has done is to substitute the largely uninformed opinions of one-third of the population as to what constitutes news for the judgments of thousands of trained journalists, most of whom have made collecting and reporting the news their careers."

These would be the 'judgments' of the 'trained journalists' who predicted Trump's winning the Republican nomination for President, right?    How about predicting that Bernie Sanders would be anything more than a minor footnote in the contest  against She  Who  Will soon be Anointed Queen of the Democrats?  The 'trained journalists' score on that one?

Seems to me that the 'largely uninformed opinions' (I think of them as votes) left those 'trained journalists' with egg on their faces.

Answer: Yes


Question: Oh bull!  That was just part of the deal taking money from Homeland Security.  The contract between them states that LTD has to do this or they won't get anymore $$$.  I've picked up on gov gobble gook language and I'm telling on you.  Cynic my arse.  Like I said earlier.......if WE (no you all cause I don't use cell phones) put down those damn things safety  would increase naturally.  l2g

Answer: Yes


Question: repeating the same babbling nonsense doesn't make it fact, it shows a lack of intelligence. It isn't an issue of prediction. Your argument is deluded straw. Furthermore it's in print and you still fail to follow the discussion. I advocate teaching algebra as an elective, not remove it entirely from the curriculum as you ignorantly post. furthermore you run like a coward from the facts I referenced as to how this is causing a dropout problem, a fact your delusions refuse to accept.

Answer:
No