We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

[Q]: The non-repeat offenders are typically people who committed much smaller crimes that would never be worthy of the death penalty in the first place.
[A]: Valid


[Q]: And in an atheist's perspective, from our own morals, we should know that causing another death of a human being is highly unnecessary, considering that we all ready have them behind bars.
[A]: Valid


[Q]: This is why I said what I said in the first place about why I'm against the death penalty.
[A]:
Valid