In this task, you're given a statement, and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence clearly disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3' corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.

Ex Input:
Statement: In the future, Clinton and Blair say, false oppositions between competition and compassion, efficiency and equity, will be resolved. Choices:  1. Other leaders agree with the sentiment that the false oppositions between competition and compassion will be resolved. 2. Clinton feels that efficiency and equity cannot coexist, while Blair feels that this is a false opposition. 3. Clinton and Blair have very similar views on resolving certain issues.

Ex Output:
2


Ex Input:
Statement: It would be sheer folly for such a company to invent preposterous lies and spins and feed them to the nation's most prominent publications. Choices:  1. The company's bet route of action would be to make up a bunch of lies. 2. It wouldn't be smart for a company to produce a bunch of lies. 3. Producing a bunch of lies would cost the company loyal customers.

Ex Output:
1


Ex Input:
Statement: back to the guy who can do something with it Choices:  1. We don't know anyone who can do anything here. 2. He was a powerful Senator with many lofty connections. 3. Lets take it back to the person who can make a difference.

Ex Output:

1