Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.

Example Input: They attack trump's wife, and this okay. Just ask Parker. But when Cruz wife is attacked, golly Trump is out of control and hates women. Kathleen Parker is habitually a shameless hypocrite. And for the record; Billary is known internationally as a shameless POS, who has defended her husbands preying on women all the way back to the governors office, and has far more "bimbo eruptions" than Bill Cosby. She is also known as a shameless politician who has gotten rich through influence peddling, and flaunting the law.
Example Output: Yes

Example Input: If we vote, instead, for those who are neither Republican or Democrat, who will we have left to vote for, and will those minor political parties be able to field candidates in all districts?  I don't know any other party that can do that.  The majority of voting Alaskans are registered as non-aligned/non-partisan/independent (choose your label).  But there is NO political party that sponsors this type of candidate.  Now, if enough people choose to rally around "anyone but D / R," perhaps we can see what a Legislature can do outside of the "mainstream" political system.  But, most importantly, we need to have those candidates on the ballot.  Where are they?
Example Output: No

Example Input: Good thing it's just another lunatic with a gun. At least we're used to those headlines.  Right?
Example Output:
Yes