We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Q: Sent1: An argument regarding the death penalty should be confined to discussions regarding those who have been wrongly convicted and sentenced to death.
 Sent2: The debate question asks "Should the death penalty be legalized?"

A: Not similar
****
Q: Sent1: If someone is bad enough to be considered for the death penalty then they must have had sure evidence that they are guilty if they are then they shouldn't deserve the right to live among people they could kill
 Sent2: An argument for putting people to death is so that they can never escape and kill again.

A: Not similar
****
Q: Sent1: They shouldn't want to send an innocent person to prison for life either so it should have been pretty clear they were guilty already.
 Sent2: If they don't want to kill an innocent person, stick to life in prison.

A:
Not similar
****