In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence can be inferred from the statement. Incorrect choices change the meaning in important ways or have details that are not mentioned in the statement. Indicate your answer as 1,2, or 3 corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.

[EX Q]: Statement: In crafting the H-2A program, Congress was acutely aware of the vulnerability of temporary agricultural workers and of problems that had arisen under other such programs, particularly the Bracero Program. Choices:  1. The Brasero Program dealt with temporary agricultural workers. 2. Congreass created the H-2A program with no knowledge of the concerns facing temporary agricultural workers. 3. Congress created the H-2A program to replace programs that had been ineffective.
[EX A]: 1

[EX Q]: Statement: of course you couldn't have known two to three years ago when you were making this decision what the taxes were going to do now the child care what you do pay doesn't not even worth a hill of beans on your tax return can't deduct it so what's it good for Choices:  1. You couldn't predict taxes going up like they did. 2. You couldn't predict what would happen with taxes. 3. You should have known what taxes were going to do.
[EX A]: 2

[EX Q]: Statement: The second side is interpreting the attitude and behavior of other people toward oneself as civil. Choices:  1. Another side is about seeing the behavior of other people as civil. 2. Another side is about seeing the behavior of other people as rude. 3. Another side is about seeing the behavior of other people as civil, the pope agrees on that.
[EX A]:
1