In this task, you must classify if a given review is positive/negative, indicating your answer as P or N.

Example Input: at first glance , three kings looks to be just another war movie , the 90s version of all those favourite war movies with names i can not remember .
the 90s version , it definitely is , just another war movie ? not in your dreams !
imagine pulp fiction approach to saving private ryan , tha 's three kings for you .
believe it or not , it bears the cool of the former and the stark humane meaning of the latter .
the story brings us to the twilight of the gulf war , with the allied troops victorious .
majpr archie gates ( clooney ) leads an enterprising bunch of grunts to a rather unorthodox post - war looting spree ; the millions in gold bars secretly stowed away by saddam in a desolate village in the desert .
as the rest of the troops are celebrating their victory and getting ready to be shipped home , this ' wild bunch ' goes awol on an armed hum - vee ( the vehicle of choice of the us army ) .
they soon find out that they have much resistance , as they get tangled with the local rebellion against saddam 's forces .
frequently switching their modes between looters and robin hood 's merry men , they become consciously attacked by their own morals .
as the film begins to roll , it seemed to have a rather ' light ' mood to it . ' special ' effects such as when gates describes to his men how a bullet can kill simply paves the way for a light - hearted funny action movie .
three kings is much smarter than that .
as the conflict becomes more and more complex , the audience will be trapped in a limbo , trying to stay focussed on that light - mood / serious - mood that the film seem to portray .
i personally found this analogous to the same feelings of the main characters involved in the film ; trapped between their initial plan paved by greed and their own sense of humanity .
this simply made the entire experience of watching three kings
truly brilliant .
action sequences are not shot as your old - fashioned war films nor anything like steven spielberg 's in - your - face war violence .
they are carefully built to generate tension with just the right tight close - ups and pauses , right before the action starts .
not john woo for sure but more of sergio leone 's spaghetti western style ( tons of them starring clint eastwood ) . great performances by clooney and wahlberg but
the brilliance have to lie in the conception of this film ;
the screenwriter and the director .
three kings ranks among the best films of the year ,
well , for me at least . highly recommended .
Example Output: P

Example Input: field of dreams
almost defies description .
although it 's about baseball , it 's not a baseball movie .
although the film is extremely spiritual , it 's not about religion .
and although field of dreams is melodramatic , it 's not a tearjerker .
to really understand what field of dreams is all about , you have to see it .
in the film , kevin costner plays ray kinsella , a baseball fan , ' 60s berkeley graduate , and iowa farmer .
one day as he is standing in the middle of his expansive corn fields , ray hears a voice ; it tells him : " if you build it , he will come .
"
then ray has a vision and somehow concludes that if he builds a baseball field in the middle of his corn , shoeless joe jackson will arise from the dead to play ball once again .
and even though it depletes his family 's savings and his neighbors think he 's crazy , ray clears away the corn and builds a baseball field , complete with bleachers and flood lights .
"
if you build it , he will come .
"
and lo and behold , shoeless joe does come -- bringing with him several of his dead teammates .
and then ray hears the voice again ; it tells him to " ease his pain .
" ray thinks this means that he must travel to boston to meet terence mann , an influential and radical novelist from the ' 60s who has since stopped writing and dropped out of society .
with great aplomb , james earl jones plays the disillusioned author who joins forces with ray and embarks with him on a magical and spiritual journey .
the cast in field of dreams is excellent ,
especially kevin costner in the lead role .
costner gives a quiet , subtle , and moving performance as a man who before building the baseball field had done nothing crazy or spontaneous in his entire life .
costner gives ray just the right mix of enthusiasm and idealism to make us believe in his mystic visions and swallow this wondrous fairy tale .
amy madigan gives a fine supporting performance as ray 's feisty and loving wife , who against her better judgement supports her husband 's crazy ideas .
in her most impressive scene , madigan vehemently argues against book burning at a p .
t .
a . meeting , displaying the sincere passion of a ' 60s berkeley radical .
ray liotta is appropriately eerie and awe - inspiring as the ghost of shoeless joe , the legendary batter who was suspended from baseball for his involvement in the 1919 chicago " black sox " scandal .
and finally , burt lancaster is memorable
in a small , but important , role as a small town doctor whose professional baseball career was limited to only one inning .
field of dreams is a touching fairy tale full of life , wonder , mystery , spirit , and humor .
it , for the most part , succeeds in capturing our emotions and suspending our disbelief .
ray kinsella 's spiritual quest in pursuit of his dreams proves to be moving and miraculous .
but while field of dreams generally avoids excessive melodrama , it unfortunately does at times go overboard , and by the end it gets down - right sappy .
in general , however , field of dreams is an emotionally satisfying fantasy -- one i can recommend to everyone but unromantic cynics .
Example Output: P

Example Input: the police negotiator is the person with the entirely unenviable job of going into ground zero and attempting to talk a dangerous criminal out of doing whatever he or she intends to do .
lives are often at stake , and the criminal is usually armed and most likely mentally unstable , prone to turn on the negotiator at a moment 's notice .
the negotiator must therefore be something of an actor , psychologist , and sham artist , in addition to being a police officer ; he must be able to think on his feet and either work toward the goal of ending the confrontation without violence , or failing that , must be prepared to facilitate the conclusion of the crisis through firepower .
most of all , the negotiator must be able to enter a situation with as little intelligence about the scenario as possible , and quickly gain control of the situation , dominate the conversation , and influence the perpetrator into thinking that the end of the conflict is what he really wants .
it takes a pretty smart person to do that .
but what if the hostage - holding criminal is just as smart ?
what if he 's also able to think on his feet ?
in fact , what if he also knows all the tricks to turning the situation to his favor ?
it is this circumstance which forms the basis for f .
gary gray 's the negotiator .
in this film , police negotiator danny roman ( samuel l . jackson ) is tipped off by his partner to corruption within the chicago police force .
when his partner turns up shot to death and internal affairs finds incriminating evidence in roman 's home , roman becomes the prime suspect of both embezzling from the police disability fund and murder .
faced with the scorn of most of the police department , and under close scrutiny by the media , roman is forced to turn in his badge in one of those typical scenes in the captain 's office .
i do n't quite remember if the captain actually said , " i hate to do this ,
but . . . " , although it would n't surprise me if he did .
luckily , the film soon shakes off the conventionalism and concentrates on the interesting premise mentioned above .
after being offered a take - it - or - leave - it deal by the district attorney , roman resolves to prove his innocence by walking into the office of internal affairs inspector niebaum ( j .
t .
walsh ) , taking him and others hostage , and proclaiming he has been framed .
although roman 's actions seem forced due to the compressed nature of his motivational build - up , gray redeems himself by involving us with the negotiations between roman and fellow police negotiator chris sabian ( kevin spacey ) which soon ensue .
jackson , while a superb actor , is miscast in the role of roman .
the actor has become so popular , and so often identified as a protagonist ( notable exceptions can be found , such as in jackie brown ) , that we as an audience have a difficult time believing he will carry out his threats .
the script also clearly sets him up as the good guy who is only trying to prove his innocence .
how can we believe he 's going to shoot a hostage ,
no matter if the hostage tried to kill him earlier ?
unfortunately , this preconception saps the film of some of it 's would - be suspenseful moments , and anything good left in those scenes is largely attributed to jackson 's acting ability
.
almost every time he 's in a scene , jackson steals it without looking back .
when spacey appears , the film has already run about a third of its course .
his is an interesting character .
made out to be some kind of negotiating superman
, our first look at him has him hopelessly trying to get his family moving to set out on vacation .
"
i can talk a man out of blowing up the sears tower , but i ca n't talk my wife out of the bedroom or my daughter off the phone , " he says .
when he gets the call to action , however , he quickly changes gears and becomes the man we expect him to be .
soon , his character has to negotiate not only with roman , but also with the swat commander ( david morse ) who is itching to send in a team to take roman out , all the while keeping wary of the fbi agents who are waiting to take over the operation , should negotiations fail .
this complex set of pressures are reflected well in sabian the negotiator and spacey the actor .
as the second protagonist , spacey measures up nicely .
gray
really lucked out with this cast .
david morse as commander
beck , ron rifkin as commander frost , and john spencer as police chief al travis are all more than competent , and can hold their own in scenes with jackson and spacey .
the only problem is the bit of typecasting that results from these choices : morse played a similar role in the rock , rifkin played the d .
a . in l . a . confidential , and spencer played a police detective in cop land .
with the level of acting , however , this can be forgiven .
also in the supporting cast , paul giamatti as rudy , one of the hostages , is notable for the comic relief he provides .
his character is initially so slimy , and giamatti himself just looks so shifty , that you expect to laugh before he even says anything .
fortunately , this does n't distract from the seriousness of the rest of the film , but instead provides some nice breathers from the level of tension which gray manages to sustain throughout .
j .
t .
walsh , as the suspicious internal affairs inspector , clocks in with one of his final performances .
sadly , the talented but underrated actor passed away in late february of this year , and the soon to be released pleasantville will mark his last film .
walsh appeared in dozens of movies such as good morning vietnam , backdraft , and nixon .
for one of his best performances , check out sling blade , in which he plays a mental patient sharing a ward with billy bob thornton .
when jack nicholson accepted his best actor oscar in march , walsh was one of the men to whom he credited his success ( the actors performed together in a few good men ) .
the negotiator is actually dedicated to walsh , and while inspector niebaum may not have been his best role , it certainly characterizes the type of character for which walsh had become most famous for playing .
in the end , the negotiator has a plotline that parallels it 's reality .
we 're served with the premise that two equally deft negotiators are battling each other to resolve the conflict in the manner which will suit each of them best .
as an audience , we 're also given a situation where two wonderfully talented actors are thrown into a movie , and we 'd like to see if one will dominate the film .
both provide some pretty good entertainment .
Example Output:
P