Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.

[EX Q]: I don't like the label "hawk" since it is used with a negative connotation.  I believe that Rep. Gabbard is a realist.  She understands that our regime change wars have been a total disaster but is also willing to admit the truth about the things that are true threats.  She "gets" ISIS, As-Qaeda, and other "Islamists" or "Jihadists" (both distinct from ordinary Muslims) and the danger they present not only to the West, but also to their fellow Muslims in the Middle East and Africa.  How many people have to be killed by ISIS, Boko Haram, Hamas, Hezbollah, Al-Qaeda, Al-Nusra, and others before the Western left accepts reality?  Tulsi gets it and for that I am grateful.
[EX A]: No

[EX Q]: G IS THAT LIKE TWO IN THE HEAD AND YOU KNOW HE'S DEAD DEAD!
[EX A]: Yes

[EX Q]: Wow - someone should do a little fact finding /research before writing..Just spent the afternoon with 500+ pugs- not single one collapsed from lack of air, not a single popped out eye. Granted pugs can overheat easily - like any bracheocephalic dog.  So can many humans. 
Be a responsible owner - easy enough to avoid that issue
All dog breeds have their health issues.  Please stop maligning one breed or  their owners - just for your "cute - agenda filled" article.
[EX A]:
No