We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

Ex Input:
There are 58 shootings on that list, and you had to delete 43 of them in order to 'copy' a list that was made up entirely of non-US shootings (you also deleted a few extra, by the looks of it).

Ex Output:
Valid


Ex Input:
You would rather be confronted by a guy with a baseball bat because you are FAR more likely to get killed by the guy with the gun.

Ex Output:
Valid


Ex Input:
Your post was addressed, and it was pointed out that a place does not become a "sensitive location" simply because large gathering of people may congregate at that location, nor because children may gather to play there.

Ex Output:

Valid