We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

[Q]: Simple if gun haters want people defending the right to bear arms to be in militias, why would you want the militias to have lesser weapons then the enemies they are defending against?
[A]: Valid


[Q]: Gun control laws do not affect criminals because criminals do not obey these laws.
[A]: Valid


[Q]: Being at a designated presidential speech zone, and armed and hour before the president shows up, simply doesn't count.
[A]:
Valid