We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Ex Input:
Sent1: Capital punishment frees up jail cells: Considering how few people we execute and how many new people enter the prison system each year, I do not see this as being a very good argument.
 Sent2: Well lets see - we have had about 70 executions in the last few years, people held on death row.

Ex Output:
Not similar


Ex Input:
Sent1: some of the innocent people that have been executed in the
 Sent2: There is no way that I believe it is okay to execute innocent people because of a flawed system.

Ex Output:
Similar


Ex Input:
Sent1: The reasons given most often for supporting the death penalty are emotional reasons of retribution for the heinous acts of the criminal.
 Sent2: Saying the death penalty is a justified method of punishment for a crime just because the criminal is a killer himself is a completely contrived reason.

Ex Output:

Not similar