In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: threat and non-threat. Threat is a statement that someone will be hurt or harmed, especially if the person does not do something in particular.

[EX Q]: Comment: Oh Pocho.  Your small brain in the morning makes my day.  Keep posting so we can keep getting a better understanding of you MAGAphants.
[EX A]: Non-threat

[EX Q]: Comment: No, members of the public who do not make nicey-face are now officially silenced.  Kidd no longer has to listen to them, she can just have them removed.

Since the point of these rules seems to be to protect Cherie Kidd from anything she finds unpleasant, I would guess that her ability to trash Council meetings, or do any other lunacy that occurs to her, will actually be more protected than it already was.
[EX A]: Non-threat

[EX Q]: Comment: Wonder if people would feel sorry for Ehvan if they read his threats? We don't take threats lightly in this day and age. 
How many people would want a lawyer who earned a degree in part because a psychologist (not even a psychiatrist) said  we had to go easier on him because he was bad at match and writing? Your money or freedom is on the line, and you have a lawyer who can't defend you, but we should still let him try so we can be nice? Not me.
[EX A]:
Non-threat