instruction:
We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.
question:
Well, if you believe that this is a 'natural right' it only applies to non-Catholics, and is conditional by the law.
answer:
Valid


question:
"We could even grant animals a right to bring suit without insisting that animals are persons, or that they are not property," Sunstein said on page 11 of Animal Rights: Current Debates and New Directions (2004).
answer:
Invalid


question:
From my perspective, its pretty clear that guns in cities are not tied to militia service.
answer:

Valid