In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: threat and non-threat. Threat is a statement that someone will be hurt or harmed, especially if the person does not do something in particular.

[EX Q]: Comment: The Church does not, and should not, condone sinful behavior as something good. This stance in no way can be equated with what Mateen did to these people at Pulse. That action was driven by hate, and hate alone.

This goes to a larger piece which addressed this ideological hate with rallies across the country this past weekend. The Left reflexively came to the defense of shariah adherent ideologues who have no problem killing homosexuals. In fact, they take it as a duty. WHY?
[EX A]: Threat

[EX Q]: Comment: So, the much vaunted TRUMPCARE has now become the DUMPCARE.

That's one for Obama :)
[EX A]: Non-threat

[EX Q]: Comment: Hahahaha. Now tell us PC spokesperson pretty please, did Ms. Ambrose make the calls to the ethics people after Trudeau's vacation event became public and and turned into a cheap political play? She would have to be awfully dumb if she did not. In addition to the hypocrisy the layer of parsing non existent differences is boggling.
[EX A]:
Non-threat