In this task, you are given text for US Congressional and California state bills, your task is to generate a summary for this bill.

Ex Input:
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Clean Water Compliance and 
Affordability Act''.

SEC. 2. INTEGRATED MUNICIPAL STORMWATER AND WASTEWATER APPROACH 
              FRAMEWORK.

    (a) In General.--In the first 5 fiscal years beginning after the 
date of enactment of this Act, the Administrator of the Environmental 
Protection Agency (referred to in this section as the 
``Administrator''), in coordination with appropriate State, local, and 
regional authorities, shall carry out a pilot program under which the 
Administrator shall work cooperatively with and facilitate the efforts 
of eligible municipalities to develop and implement integrated plans to 
meet wastewater and stormwater obligations of the eligible 
municipalities under the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 
1251 et seq.) in a more cost-effective and flexible manner.
    (b) Framework.--The Administrator shall carry out the pilot program 
in a manner that is consistent with the Integrated Municipal Stormwater 
and Wastewater Approach Framework issued by the Environmental 
Protection Agency and dated May 2012.
    (c) Selection of Eligible Municipalities.--
            (1) In general.--The Administrator, in consultation with 
        States that have approved National Pollutant Discharge 
        Elimination System programs, shall select not less than 15 
        eligible municipalities to participate in the pilot program.
            (2) Eligible municipality.--An eligible municipality is a 
        county, city, town, township, or subdivision of a State or 
        local government that--
                    (A) qualifies as a National Pollutant Discharge 
                Elimination System permit holder or designee; or
                    (B) is a party to an administrative order, 
                administrative consent agreement, or judicial consent 
                decree to comply with the requirements of the Federal 
                Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.).
            (3) Selection factors.--
                    (A) In general.--In selecting the eligible 
                municipalities to participate in the pilot program, the 
                Administrator shall give priority to--
                            (i) eligible municipalities that are 
                        operating under an administrative order, 
                        administrative consent agreement, or judicial 
                        consent decree to comply with the requirements 
                        of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 
                        U.S.C. 1251 et seq.);
                            (ii) eligible municipalities that are 
                        affected by affordability constraints in 
                        planning and implementing control measures to 
                        address wet weather discharges from wastewater 
                        and stormwater facilities of the eligible 
                        municipalities; and
                            (iii) eligible municipalities with a 
                        history of knowledgeable, detailed, and 
                        comprehensive efforts to develop integrated and 
                        adaptive clean water management practices.
                    (B) Use of adaptive management approaches.--In 
                selecting eligible municipalities to participate in the 
                pilot program, the Administrator may give priority to 
                an eligible municipality that is seeking to develop and 
                implement an integrated plan that includes adaptive 
                approaches to account for changed or future uncertain 
                circumstances, including--
                            (i) the use of new innovative technical or 
                        institutional approaches; and
                            (ii) the ability to adapt the integrated 
                        plan in response to new regulatory requirements 
                        and reductions in financial capability.
    (d) Approval of Integrated Plans.--
            (1) In general.--In approving the integrated plan of an 
        eligible municipality under the pilot program established under 
        subsection (a), the Administrator shall--
                    (A) account for the financial capability of the 
                eligible municipality to adequately address the 
                requirements of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act 
                (33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.) that apply to the eligible 
                municipality;
                    (B) prioritize the obligations of the eligible 
                municipality under the Federal Water Pollution Control 
                Act (33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.) according to the most 
                cost-effective and environmentally beneficial outcomes;
                    (C) account for the maintenance, operational, and 
                regulatory obligations of the eligible municipality; 
                and
                    (D) enable the eligible municipality to implement 
                innovative and flexible approaches to meet the 
                obligations of the eligible municipality under the 
                Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1251 et 
                seq.).
            (2) Additional authorities.--In carrying out the pilot 
        program established under subsection (a), the Administrator 
        may, in full coordination and mutual agreement with an eligible 
        municipality selected to participate in the pilot program--
                    (A) extend the allowable national pollutant 
                discharge elimination system permit term under section 
                402 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 
                U.S.C. 1342) to a maximum of 25 years, and make 
                corresponding changes to any associated implementation 
                schedule;
                    (B) modify the implementation terms of a consent 
                decree entered into by the eligible municipality with 
                the Administrator pursuant to that Act; and
                    (C) provide additional regulatory flexibility under 
                the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1251 
                et seq.) in approving and implementing an integrated 
                plan that includes adaptive approaches in order to 
                encourage the innovation integral to such approaches.
    (e) Report to Congress.--Not later than 1 year after the date of 
enactment of this Act, and each year thereafter for 5 years, the 
Administrator shall submit to Congress a report on the results of the 
pilot program established under subsection (a), including a description 
of the specific outcomes expected to be achieved that will reduce the 
costs of complying with the requirements of the Federal Water Pollution 
Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.) for--
            (1) eligible municipalities participating in the pilot 
        program; and
            (2) eligible municipalities that are similarly situated but 
        not participating in the pilot program.

Ex Output:
Clean Water Compliance and Affordability Act  This bill requires the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to carry out a pilot program to facilitate the efforts of eligible municipalities to develop and implement integrated plans to meet their wastewater and stormwater obligations under the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (commonly known as the Clean Water Act) in a cost-effective and flexible manner and consistent with the Integrated Municipal Stormwater and Wastewater Approach Framework issued by the EPA in May 2012. The pilot program must facilitate the efforts of at least 15 municipalities. A municipality is eligible to participate in the pilot program if it is: (1) a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit holder or designee; or (2) a party to an administrative order, administrative consent agreement, or judicial consent decree to comply with the requirements of the Clean Water Act. The EPA must give priority to municipalities that: (1) are affected by affordability constraints in planning and implementing control measures addressing wet weather discharges from wastewater and stormwater facilities; and (2) have a history of knowledgeable, detailed, and comprehensive efforts to develop integrated and adaptive clean water management practices. The EPA may give priority to municipalities seeking to develop and implement an integrated plan that includes approaches that adapt to changed or future uncertain circumstances. With the mutual agreement of participating municipalities, the EPA may: (1) extend the allowable NPDES permit term by up to 25 years, (2) modify the implementation terms of a consent decree, and (3) provide additional regulatory flexibility in approving and implementing an integrated plan that includes adaptive approaches.


Ex Input:
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``National Future Farmers of America 
Commemorative Coin Act of 2009''.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

    The Congress finds that--
            (1) the National Future Farmers of America Organization 
        makes a positive difference in the lives of students by 
        developing their potential for leadership, personal growth, and 
        career success through agricultural education;
            (2) the National Future Farmers of America Organization was 
        founded in 1928, as the ``Future Farmers of America'', to 
        provide leadership training for high school students of 
        vocational agriculture;
            (3) the National Future Farmers of America Organization 
        created a national agricultural education model for use in 
        public school systems that has been adopted by youth leadership 
        organizations throughout the world;
            (4) the National Future Farmers of America Organization 
        prepares its student members to think critically, work in 
        teams, and be successful in more than 300 careers relating to 
        the science, business, and technology of agriculture;
            (5) approximately 9,000,000 living former members of the 
        National Future Farmers of America Organization are prominent 
        industry executives, members of Congress, community members, 
        farmers, and productive United States citizens;
            (6) in 2009, the National Future Farmers of America 
        Organization had 507,763 members in more than 7,400 local 
        chapters in all 50 States, Puerto Rico, and the United States 
        Virgin Islands;
            (7) the Future Farmers of America was chartered by Congress 
        in 1950, and continues to be an intra-curricular educational 
        organization within public school systems throughout the United 
        States; and
            (8) October 2012 will mark the beginning of a year of 
        celebration in honor of the 85th anniversary of the founding of 
        the National Future Farmers of America Organization, which took 
        place at the first national convention of the National Future 
        Farmers of America Organization.

SEC. 3. COIN SPECIFICATIONS.

    (a) Denominations.--In commemoration of the National Future Farmers 
of America Organization and the 85th anniversary of the National Future 
Farmers of America Organization, the Secretary of the Treasury (in this 
Act referred to as the ``Secretary'') shall mint and issue--
            (1) not more than 100,000 gold coins, which shall--
                    (A) weigh 8.359 grams;
                    (B) have a diameter of 0.850 inches; and
                    (C) contain 90 percent gold and 10 percent alloy; 
                and
            (2) not more than 500,000 silver coins, which shall--
                    (A) weigh 26.7 grams;
                    (B) have a diameter of 1.500 inches; and
                    (C) contain 90 percent silver and 10 percent 
                copper.
    (b) Legal Tender.--The coins minted under this Act shall be legal 
tender, as provided in section 5103 of title 31, United States Code.
    (c) Numismatic Items.--For purposes of sections 5134 and 5136 of 
title 31, United States Code, all coins minted under this Act shall be 
considered to be numismatic items.

SEC. 4. DESIGN OF COINS.

    (a) Design Requirements.--
            (1) In general.--The design of the coins minted under this 
        Act shall be emblematic of the 85-year history of the National 
        Future Farmers of America Organization.
            (2) Designation and inscriptions.--On each coin minted 
        under this Act, there shall be--
                    (A) a designation of the value of the coin;
                    (B) inscriptions of the words ``Liberty'', ``In God 
                We Trust'', ``United States of America'', and ``E 
                Pluribus Unum''; and
                    (C) an inscription of the year 2012.
    (b) Selection.--The design for the coins minted under this Act 
shall be--
            (1) selected by the Secretary, after consultation with the 
        National Future Farmers of America Organization and the 
        Commission of Fine Arts; and
            (2) reviewed by the Citizens Coinage Advisory Committee.

SEC. 5. ISSUANCE OF COINS.

    (a) Quality of Coins.--Coins minted under this Act shall be issued 
in uncirculated and proof qualities.
    (b) Period of Issuance.--The Secretary may issue coins under this 
Act only for the 1-year period beginning on January 1, 2012.

SEC. 6. SALE OF COINS.

    (a) Sale Price.--The coins minted under this Act shall be sold by 
the Secretary at a price equal to the sum of--
            (1) the face value of the coins;
            (2) the surcharge provided in section 7 with respect to 
        such coins; and
            (3) the cost of designing and minting the coins (including 
        labor, materials, dies, use of machinery, overhead expenses, 
        marketing, and shipping).
    (b) Bulk Sales.--The Secretary shall make bulk sales of the coins 
minted under this Act at a reasonable discount.
    (c) Prepaid Orders.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary shall accept prepaid orders 
        for the coins minted under this Act before the issuance of such 
        coins.
            (2) Discount.--Sale prices with respect to prepaid orders 
        under paragraph (1) shall be at a reasonable discount.

SEC. 7. SURCHARGES.

    (a) In General.--All sales of coins minted under this Act shall 
include a surcharge of $25 per gold coin and $10 per silver coin.
    (b) Distribution.--Subject to section 5134(f) of title 31, United 
States Code, the Secretary shall pay all of the surcharges received by 
the Secretary from the sale of coins minted under this Act to the 
National Future Farmers of America Foundation in Indianapolis, Indiana, 
for the creation of an endowment to enhance and expand programs that 
encourage the development of leadership skills, personal growth, and 
career success through agricultural education and the Future Farmers of 
America.
    (c) Audits.--The Comptroller General of the United States is 
authorized to examine such books, records, documents, and other data of 
the organization described in subsection (b) as may be related to the 
expenditures of amounts paid under subsection (b).

Ex Output:
National Future Farmers of America Commemorative Coin Act of 2009 - Directs the Secretary of the Treasury to mint and issue gold and silver coins in commemoration of the National Future Farmers of America Organization and the 85th anniversary of such Organization.

Authorizes the issuance of coins under this Act only for a one year period, beginning on January 1, 2012.

Requires all sales of coins minted under this Act to include a surcharge of $25 per gold coin and $10 per silver coin.

Requires all of the surcharges received from the sale of such coins to be paid to the National Future Farmers of America Foundation in Indianapolis, Indiana, for the creation of an endowment to enhance and expand programs that encourage the development of leadership skills, personal growth, and career success through agricultural education and the Future Farmers of America.


Ex Input:
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Embassy Design and Security Act of 
2010''.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

    Congress makes the following findings:
            (1) Embassies--
                    (A) are an important reflection of American values, 
                openness, ingenuity, and innovation;
                    (B) should reflect the best of United States 
                design, architecture, sustainability, and technology; 
                and
                    (C) should maintain security as a top priority.
            (2) Since 2001, the Bureau of Overseas Buildings Operations 
        (referred to in this section as ``OBO'') has--
                    (A) completed 71 new diplomatic and consular 
                facilities; and
                    (B) moved more than 20,000 individuals into safer, 
                more secure and functional facilities.
            (3) OBO, which has 34 other building projects in design or 
        construction in 2010, has demonstrated its ability to construct 
        diplomatic and consular facilities in a timely and expeditious 
        manner.
            (4) Since the August 1998 embassy bombings in East Africa, 
        United States diplomatic and consular facilities have faced 
        increasing attacks.
            (5) OBO constructs safe and functional facilities for 
        American diplomats to allow them to advance foreign policy and 
        to strive to create better, safer, and more secure communities 
        for all citizens of the world.
            (6) In his seminal memo, entitled ``Guiding Principles for 
        Federal Architecture'', the Honorable Daniel Patrick Moynihan 
        laid out the following core principles:
                    (A) ``It should be our object to meet the test of 
                Pericles' evocation to the Athenians, which the 
                President commended to the Massachusetts legislature in 
                his address of January 9, 1961: `We do not imitate--for 
                we are a model to others.'''.
                    (B) ``The policy shall be to provide requisite and 
                adequate facilities in an architectural style and form 
                which is distinguished and which will reflect the 
                dignity, enterprise, vigor and stability of the 
                American National Government.''.
                    (C) ``The development of an official style must be 
                avoided. . . . The advice of distinguished architects, 
                as a rule, ought to be sought prior to the award of 
                important design contracts.''.
                    (D) ``The choice and development of the building 
                site should be considered the first step of the design 
                process.''.
            (7) The principles set forth in paragraph (2) provide the 
        foundation for the General Services Administration's Design 
        Excellence Program, which--
                    (A) establishes nationwide policies and procedures 
                for selecting distinguished architects and artists for 
                General Services Administration's commissions; and
                    (B) implements rigorous review processes to produce 
                facilities and civic artworks of outstanding quality 
                and value.
            (8) Section 401 of the Energy Independence and Security Act 
        of 2007 (Public Law 110-140) defines a high-performance 
        building as ``a building that integrates and optimizes on a 
        life cycle basis all major high performance attributes, 
        including energy conservation, environment, safety, security, 
        durability, accessibility, cost-benefit, productivity, 
        sustainability, functionality, and operational 
        considerations''.
            (9) The 2009 American Institute of Architects ``Design for 
        Diplomacy: New Embassies for the 21st Century'' reports 
        ``significant interest in developing an approach that would 
        enable architects and engineers to design embassies that 
        reflected the unique needs of a site at a foreign post''.
            (10) The Center for Strategic and International Studies 
        published a report in 2007, authored by the Embassy of the 
        Future Commission and entitled ``The Embassy of the Future'', 
        which makes the following statements:
                    (A) ``The new embassy facilities have in some 
                places created the perception among some of a fearful 
                United States, retreating behind high walls and 
                isolating itself from the people it is trying to 
                reach.''.
                    (B) ``The commission believes that it is important 
                to meet security needs in ways that reflect the new 
                diplomatic job.''.
                    (C) ``[S]etbacks, barriers, and other security 
                features can be designed in ways that integrate 
                security with the overall building design and 
                surroundings.''.

SEC. 3. STATEMENT OF POLICY.

    It is the policy of the United States to adopt design excellence as 
a mandate to advance a new generation of secure, high-performance, 
sustainable diplomatic and consular facilities in support of United 
States foreign policy.

SEC. 4. ESTABLISHMENT OF A DESIGN EXCELLENCE PROGRAM AT THE DEPARTMENT 
              OF STATE.

    The Secretary of State should--
            (1) develop and establish a design excellence program, 
        which shall be--
                    (A) modeled after the program used by the General 
                Services Administration; and
                    (B) tailored to the specific requirements of the 
                Bureau of Overseas Building Operations;
            (2) ensure that security remains a top priority for all 
        diplomatic and consular facilities;
            (3) integrate sustainability and sustainable design and 
        construction best practices for all facilities constructed 
        under the direction of the Bureau of Overseas Building 
        Operations;
            (4) encourage innovation in building design;
            (5) create a framework for testing new technologies as they 
        come on the market that can create potential value for new 
        facilities;
            (6) create a design excellence policies and procedures 
        manual, which shall--
                    (A) explain the mandate of the design excellence 
                program; and
                    (B) describe how the Department of State will 
                implement and operate the program;
            (7) establish a high-level board to track the progress of 
        the design excellence program, which--
                    (A) shall be composed of an equivalent number of--
                            (i) outside professionals who have specific 
                        architectural, design, and industry expertise; 
                        and
                            (ii) senior United States Government 
                        officials; and
                    (B) shall meet not less frequently than 
                semiannually--
                            (i) to review and analyze the progress and 
                        results of the program; and
                            (ii) to provide guidance to the Department 
                        of State on questions that may arise;
            (8) train staff to support design excellence through 
        education and training on program implementation to ensure 
        consistency and quality on all projects;
            (9) perform post-occupancy evaluations to identify the 
        problems and successes of each facility;
            (10) consider utilizing research studies from outside the 
        Department of State to bring new ideas and provide cost-
        effective solutions;
            (11) include fine arts advisors as part of the design 
        excellence program and peer review panels for all embassy 
        projects; and
            (12) undertake a concurrent review of the Standard Embassy 
        Design Program (referred to in this section as the ``SED 
        Program'') to determine--
                    (A) the best way to integrate the newly established 
                design excellence program with the SED Program; and
                    (B) modifications that need to be made to the SED 
                Program.

SEC. 5. ARCHITECTURAL ADVISORY BOARD.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall reestablish the Architectural 
Advisory Board (referred to in this section as the ``Board'') in order 
to--
            (1) advise the Department of State on design standards;
            (2) recommend the most appropriate style of architecture 
        for prospective projects;
            (3) review the quality and fitness of designs;
            (4) advise on an appropriate balance and integration 
        between security priorities and American values of openness and 
        design;
            (5) advise how the Department can construct new diplomatic 
        and consular facilities that are built to the most up-to-date 
        energy efficiency requirements, standards, checklists, or 
        rating systems, to the extent possible;
            (6) advise how the Department can place diplomatic and 
        consular facilities in urban and city center locations, to the 
        extent possible--
                    (A) to permit greater accessibility to national 
                government institutions; and
                    (B) to facilitate ease of access for local 
                residents; and
            (7) advise how the Department can construct new diplomatic 
        and consular facilities with future, projected growth needs in 
        mind, including growth needs for other Federal agencies.
    (b) Composition.--The Board shall be composed of 5 members 
appointed by the Secretary from outside the United States Government, 
who are noted for their knowledge of, and experience with, architecture 
and design.
    (c) Deadline for Appointments.--All members of the Board shall be 
appointed not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
    (d) Meetings.--The Board shall meet not less frequently than 
semiannually at the call of the Chairperson.
    (e) Compensation.--
            (1) In general.--Except as provided in paragraph (2), 
        members of the Board--
                    (A) shall be paid compensation out of funds made 
                available for the purposes of this title at the daily 
                equivalent of the highest rate payable under section 
                5332 of title 5, United States Code, for each day 
                (including travel time) during which the member is 
                engaged in the actual performance of duties as a member 
                of the Board; and
                    (B) while away from the member's home or regular 
                place of business on necessary travel in the actual 
                performance of duties as a member of the Board, shall 
                be paid per diem, travel, and transportation expenses 
                in the same manner as is provided under subchapter I of 
                chapter 57 of title 5, United States Code.
            (2) Limitation.--A member of the Board may not be paid 
        compensation under paragraph (1)(B) for more than 90 days in 
        any calendar year.
    (f) Exemption.--The Board shall be exempt from the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (5 U.S.C. App.).

SEC. 6. REPORT TO REVIEW THE STANDARD EMBASSY DESIGN PROGRAM.

    Not later than 1 year after the date of the enactment of this Act, 
the Architectural Review Board established under section 5 shall submit 
to the appropriate congressional committees an assessment of the 
Standard Embassy Design Program, which shall include--
            (1) a comprehensive review of the Standard Embassy Design 
        template, including the utility of the template in overseas 
        contexts and general strengths, weaknesses, drawbacks, and 
        limitations to the template;
            (2) an analysis of the cost-effectiveness and overall 
        utility of incorporating 1 of 4 classes of Standard Embassy 
        Design (small, medium, large, and extra large);
            (3) an analysis of whether such approach unduly limits the 
        flexibility of design and responsiveness to local contexts and 
        priorities;
            (4) a consideration of alternative approaches to enable 
        architects and engineers--
                    (A) to design embassies that reflect the unique 
                needs of a site at a foreign post; and
                    (B) to incorporate appropriate standard design and 
                construction components common to the building type;
            (5) an examination of the effectiveness of the SED Program 
        in--
                    (A) integrating security concerns with design 
                considerations;
                    (B) ensuring an adequate growth footprint for 
                future embassy personnel increases;
                    (C) incorporating sustainable design and the most 
                up-to-date energy efficiency requirements, standards, 
                checklists, or rating systems for diplomatic and 
                consular facilities;
                    (D) allowing for open and public access; and
                    (E) ensuring overall design excellence; and
            (6) recommendations on--
                    (A) the best way to integrate the newly established 
                Embassy Design Excellence Program with the SED Program; 
                and
                    (B) the modifications to the SED Program that are 
                warranted.

SEC. 7. MODIFIED SECURITY REQUIREMENTS FOR UNITED STATES DIPLOMATIC AND 
              CONSULAR FACILITIES.

    (a) Sense of Congress on Co-Location and Security Requirements.--It 
is the sense of Congress that--
            (1) while assessing the necessity, security, and efficiency 
        of co-locating all United States Government personnel at a 
        single embassy site within a single foreign country, the 
        Secretary should consider placing United States Government 
        personnel at locations conducive to maximizing their use;
            (2) while cost efficiency and security considerations may 
        justify the consolidation of multiple Federal departments and 
        agencies at a single location, such a determination should not 
        be made without taking into account other crucial policy 
        considerations;
            (3) the Secretary should consider alternative location 
        arrangements that do not affect the strength and 
        appropriateness of security arrangements for United States 
        Government personnel;
            (4) it is crucial that security standards remain uniformly 
        high in all locations hosting United States Government 
        personnel;
            (5) the perimeter distance requirement under section 
        606(a)(3) of the Secure Embassy Construction and 
        Counterterrorism Act of 1999 (22 U.S.C. 4865(a)(3)) imposes a 
        uniform security standard for all diplomatic and consular 
        facilities regardless of country context or specific security 
        needs;
            (6) a more nuanced approach may tailor specific security 
        requirements, such as perimeter distance requirements, to 
        particular security considerations in a given country; and
            (7) while every country with diplomatic representation must 
        have a modern, secure, safe, and functional facility, it is 
        important to integrate security with the long-term impact on 
        the foreign policy objectives of the Department of State.
    (b) Diplomatic and Consular Facilities Task Force.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary of State should establish 
        the Diplomatic and Consular Facilities Task Force (referred to 
        in this section as the ``Task Force'')--
                    (A) to review existing regulations, standards, and 
                procedures to implement paragraphs (2) and (3) of 
                section 606(a) of the Secure Embassy Construction and 
                Counterterrorism Act of 1999 (22 U.S.C. 4865(a)); and
                    (B) to make appropriate recommendations to modify 
                or revoke the regulations, standards, and procedures 
                under such Act.
            (2) Composition.--The Task Force shall be composed of 7 
        members, of whom--
                    (A) 4 shall be senior career professionals of the 
                Department of State with different personnel 
                backgrounds; and
                    (B) 3 shall be professionals outside the United 
                States Government who are noted for their knowledge and 
                experience in construction and security issues.
            (3) Deadline for appointments.--All members of the Task 
        Force shall be appointed not later than 60 days after the date 
        of the enactment of this Act.
            (4) Exemption.--The Task Force shall be exempt from the 
        Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. App.).
            (5) Termination.--The Task Force shall terminate on the 
        date on which the report is submitted to Congress under 
        subsection (c)(2).
    (c) Reports.--
            (1) Secretary of state.--Not later than 1 year after the 
        date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of State shall 
        submit a report to the Committee on Foreign Relations of the 
        Senate and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of 
        Representatives that describes--
                    (A) the recommendations made by the Task Force 
                under subsection (b)(1)(B); and
                    (B) the impact of such recommendations on the 
                operations of, and security standards for, United 
                States diplomatic and consular facilities.
            (2) Comptroller general.--Not later than 120 days after the 
        submission of the report under paragraph (1), the Comptroller 
        General of the United States shall submit a report to the 
        appropriate congressional committees that contains--
                    (A) a review of, and comments on, the 
                recommendations made by the Task Force under subsection 
                (b)(1)(B); and
                    (B) the Comptroller General's recommendations for 
                improving the security standards at all United States 
                diplomatic and consular facilities.

Ex Output:

Embassy Design and Security Act of 2010 - States that it is U.S. policy to adopt design excellence as a mandate for a new generation of secure, high-performance diplomatic and consular facilities.

Urges the Secretary of State to establish: (1) a design excellence program modeled after the General Services Administration (GSA) program to integrate security, innovation, and design and construction best practices for all facilities constructed under the direction of the Bureau of Overseas Building Operations; and (2) a high-level board to track the design excellence program's progress.

 Directs the Secretary to reestablish the Architectural Advisory Board to: (1) advise the Department of State on design standards; and (2) review design quality and fitness.