Given a document, find the main entity about whom the author is writing. Write the full name if mentioned in the text. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

Input: Consider Input: TOKYO (Reuters) -  Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abeâs ruling bloc  scored a big win in Sundayâs election  bolstering  his  chance of becoming the nationâs longest-serving premier and re-energizing  his  push to revise the pacifist constitution.
âAnd as we saw in the U.K. ... a referendum could be tricky. So while  Abe  is likely to be prime minister for the time being  it is too early to say whether  he  can stay in power until 2021.â  Abe  declined to say if  he  would run for a third term.
 Abe  had said  he  needed a new mandate to tackle a "national crisis" from North Korea's missile and nuclear threats and a fast-aging population  and to approve  his  idea of diverting revenue from a planned sales tax hike to education and child care from public debt repayment [reut.rs/2yC0pma].
 He  called the poll amid confusion in the opposition camp and an uptick in  his  ratings  dented earlier in the year by scandals over suspected cronyism and a perception  he  had grown arrogant after nearly five years in office.

Output: Shinzo Abe


Input: Consider Input: Businessman Chris Kennedy  jumped in with  his  take: âThatâs why we have a divided government â  he  said. âFor gosh sakes  if weâre not going to call out other parts of government â if you donât see your role as governor to call out a mayor whoâs not representing the people of a certain city  if youâre not willing to call out an assessor whoâs violating the 1964 Civil Rights Act â if you donât think thatâs the proper role of government  you should go read the Constitution ...
Well  yes  Iâm all for calling politicians to account â pointing out their failings and demanding they do better. And while I understand that constructive criticism and attempts at engagement and compromise arenât politically fashionable  I donât think  Kennedy  set the table for long-term success  should  he  be elected  with  his  over-the-top accusation earlier this month that Mayor Rahm Emanuel is leading a âstrategic gentrification planâ to drive African-Americans and other minorities out of the city.
Iâd say the same thing about  Kennedy âs repeated claims  one example seen above  that successful property-tax appeals result in less money for our schools.
Thatâs not how property taxes work. Schools set an overall levy  and that amount is divvied up among all the property taxpayers in the district. When your tax bill goes down after an appeal  everyone elseâs goes up fractionally to compensate. Candidate Daniel Biss  a state senator from Evanston  explained this clearly to  Kennedy  during a similar session Wednesday before the Chicago Sun-Times Editorial Board.

Output: Chris Kennedy


Input: Consider Input: It is fascinating and welcome to see liberals discovering their consciences on  Bill Clintonâs  alleged rapist tendencies. True  this moral revelation comes about two decades later than it should have  and at precisely the moment the Left can no longer reasonably ignore it and not a moment sooner.
Just the same  it is nice to finally see some honesty on this issue. It is nice to see liberals  having no more use for the Clintons  finally undertaking what MSNBC host Chris Hayes calls âa real reckoningâ with the very real possibility that  Bill Clinton  raped Juanita Broaddrick nearly 40 years ago.
And yet. One is tempted to believe weâre witnessing not a âreckoningâ but a quick and guilty kind of moral shrug  a sort of Kansas City shuffle meant to absolve a bunch of deeply culpable people of their own deep and stinking culpability. For a real âreckoningâ of American liberalismâs wink-nod approach to  Bill Clintonâs  alleged sex crimes would implicate American liberalism itself  or at least the last few decades of it. That is understandably not something many liberals are willing to do.
A great example of this evasive genre can be found at The Atlantic  where Caitlin Flanagan has written an article titled  simply  â Bill Clinton : A Reckoning.â The article itself is actually not a reckoning of  Bill Clinton  or even an overture toward a reckoning.
Indeed  Flanagan only comes to the sexual assault allegations leveled at  Clinton  only about two-thirds of the way through  after bringing up Clarence Thomasâs alleged sexual harassment of Anita Hill. She places most of the blame for  Clinton  on âmachine feminismâ rather than Democratic opportunism  then lamely asserts Democrats need to âcome to termsâ with how they âabandoned some of [their] central principlesâ in their unthinking defense of  Clinton .
Almost as an afterthought  Goldberg writes: âItâs fair to conclude  that because of Broaddrickâs allegations   Bill Clinton  no longer has a place in decent society.â Goodness  after two decades this is the best we can manage?
Even Hayesâs own viral tweet is couched in a tired and evasive formula. âAs gross and cynical and hypocrtical [sic] as the rightâs âwhat about  Bill Clinton â stuff is â  he  wrote  âitâs also true that Democrats and the center left are overdue for a real reckoning with the allegations against  him .â Got it: so the Right is âgross and cynical and hypocriticalâ regarding the Leftâs steadfast avoidance of  Bill Clintonâs  alleged sex crimes  but weâre also correct? Are liberals capable of discussing  Clinton âs sordid history without having to obsessively refer back to conservatives?
They Let  Bill Clinton  Keep Legitimacy for 18 More Years
There is a deeper and more cynical politics at work here. âReckoningâ with  Bill Clintonâs  alleged crimes is not just a matter of the Democratic Party saying sorry for not believing Broaddrick in 1999.  Bill Clinton  has remained a prominent fixture of the party in the intervening 18 years  including as a major fundraiser during  his  wifeâs two failed campaigns for president and as a stump for other Democrats  including President Obama.
Progressives  meanwhile  adore  him . â Bill Clinton  couldnât keep it in  his  pants  but  he  was a great president!â one very liberal woman told me years ago. Broaddrick would surely agree with the first part. Summing up the feelings of millions of progressive millennials  comedian John Mulaney described  Clinton  as a âsmooth and fantastic hillbilly who should be declared emperor of the United State of America.â This kind of hero-worship is only possible if one disbelieves Broaddrickâs testimony entirelyâtestimony that  20 years on  remains very credible.
A âreckoningâ of the accusations against  Bill Clinton  must thus also function as a reckoning of the last couple of decades of Democratic politics  a politics that has featured  Bill Clinton  as an ancillary yet still near-permanent fixture. Every Democrat has known of Broaddrickâs accusations for years. Yet  Bill Clinton  was still eagerly accepted within âdecent society â and  his  wifeâwho is quite reasonably seen as both an apologist for her husbandâs perverted behavior and possibly a criminal conspirator regarding his crimesâbecame the standard-bearer of the Democratic Party itself in the last election.
To reckon with all of this means to reckon with the Democratic party in totoâits political instincts  its morals  and its public credibility and future viability.The Left predictably isnât very keen to do that. So we get what weâve witnessed in the past week: liberals feigning a kind of come-to-Jesus public confessional over  Bill Clinton  while ultimately just complaining about conservatives.
It is true that  in the end  we do not know if  Bill Clinton  raped Broaddrick. It is virtually impossible to prove  it  one way or the other  as  it  generally is with these types of claims. It would not be wholly unreasonable for someone to doubt Broaddrick after a careful review of the evidence. Then again  her claim  and the evidence surrounding it  is compelling enough to be believable  more so than many.
So what does it say about the Democratic Party that it has nevertheless allowed  Bill Clinton  a revered and permanent spot in its ranks? And what does it say about liberals that  even now  after all of this time  they cannot truly come to grips with it?


Output: Bill Clinton