In this task, you're given a statement, and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence clearly disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3' corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.

[EX Q]: Statement: She chose NYU Law over Columbia specifically because NYU would cover more of her tuition. Choices:  1. She thought NYU would cover more of her tuition than Columbia. 2. She would have chosen Columbia if they would have covered more of her tuition. 3. She is going to Columbia even though NYU would be cheaper.
[EX A]: 3

[EX Q]: Statement: It's pretty hard to say, `Never speak again. Choices:  1. If you push this red button all the people will stop talking forever. 2. The President may wish to, but cannot tell others to stop talking forever. 3. You can't actually tell some one to shut up permanently.
[EX A]: 1

[EX Q]: Statement: Among the mind-numbing details reported by the New York Times : Second-generation tenants could remain in regulated apartments provided they were willing to pay the vacancy bonus. Choices:  1. Second-generation tenants can never remain in regulated apartments.  2. It is possible for a second-generation tenant to stay in a regulated apartment.  3. Most second-generation tenants have trouble paying the vacancy bonus. 
[EX A]:
1