In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.
--------
Question: Comment: See if you can debate rationally rather than launching ad hominem attacks.

Answer: Non-sexual-explicit


Question: Comment: Sounds like McComas had a few priors but the theft was the only prior that left a victim. He might have tried something stupid that angered the cop. Freedom of information absolutely should be available as soon as it is discovered, for anyone to study. I'm not saying the police are corrupt but they do protect each other. What I fear is the concept of "We have conducted a thorough internal investigation and find no wrong doing on the part of the officer"

Answer: Non-sexual-explicit


Question: Comment: I'd caution you against making false accusations. 

Your understanding is wrong. Every single one of Bill Clinton's accusers has either recanted or changed her story several times, and there is absolutely no evidence that he ever assaulted anyone. His dalliance with ML was not only consensual, but instigated by her. Don't you think Ken Starr would have prosecuted him for rape, or sexual harassment, if there were the slightest chance the accusations were true?

In contrast, Trump didn't just make offensive comments. He cheated on every one of his three wives. He has been accused by a dozen women of sexual assault and rape. He admits he walked into dressing rooms where girls as young as 15 were nude. He bragged about grabbing women by their genitals. Funny how you left all that out. I'd call that pretty bad behavior.

Answer:
Sexual-explicit