In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: toxic and non-toxic. Toxicity is defiend as anything that is rude, disrespectful, or unreasonable that would make someone want to leave a converation.

Ex Input:
Comment: A firm justification for laws limiting the freedom of citizens is the protection of others who might be adversely affected.  In the case of alcohol, there is a potential danger of drunken driving and other acts committed under the influence.  Good laws do not limit individual freedom unless it significantly advances the safety or rights of the general population.  In the present instance, the purchase and use of cigarettes by the younger population does not significantly impact the safety or rights of the general population.  Therefore this restriction on freedom does not conform to good democratic practice.  The dangers of second hand smoke are addressed by other laws prohibiting smoking in various places.  This law represents only the limitation of individual freedom because of the opinions and preferences of others.  In a free society, limitations on freedom should be avoided except when absolutely necessary.

Ex Output:
Non-toxic


Ex Input:
Comment: It's been lamented that the time and expense to reinforce basic seamanship skills have been sacrificed for more intensive tactical training, which implies far greater reliance on electronic sensors and computers than ever before.  Even in the US Navy, there is no such thing as a limitless budget or limitless time. 

I suspect this accident will be attributed to something as simple as not following the "rules of the road" by failure to yield the right of way.  Publicly accessible resources now strongly suggest the USS John S. McCain was the vessel CROSSING a heavily used traffic lane, and therefore the onus was on its crew to avoid vessels transiting that lane. 

If true, then another Captain's naval career, plus the careers of all other crew members held responsible, will be flushed down the toilet.  We mustn't ever forget that shipmate's lives were lost and that drowning is far from a painless death.

Ex Output:
Non-toxic


Ex Input:
Comment: The Globe article headline is "Doctors warn thousands could leave for U.S. over new federal tax hikes".  This is a misstatement.  There are no "new taxes"  for doctors. It appears some doctors have discovered a loophole to avoid the existing taxes by multiple use  of a small business rate.  The government is closing the loophole, so the doctors now have to pay what they should have done all along, in common with most other Canadians.

I find it unbelievable that many doctors would want to move to the USA because they were denied a loophole in their taxes.  This would imply that these doctors have no commitment to Canada or our way of life, and few if any family ties to keep them here.  Does the Globe really have evidence that many doctors would move, or is it just an imaginary claim in order to create more sensational articles?

Ex Output:

Non-toxic