TASK DEFINITION: In this task, you will be shown a sentence, and you should determine whether it is overruling or non-overruling. In law, an overruling sentence is a statement that nullifies a previous case decision as a precedent by a constitutionally valid statute or a decision by the same or higher ranking court which establishes a different rule on the point of law involved. Classify your answers into overruling or non-overruling
PROBLEM: siewe v. gonzales, 480 f.3d 160, 170 (2d cir. 2007) (""[a] single false document or a single instance of false testimony may (if attributable to the petitioner) infect the balance of the alien's uncorroborated or unauthenticated evidence."").

SOLUTION: non-overruling

PROBLEM: see id.; see also meyer v. jones, 696 n.w.2d 611, 614 (iowa 2005) (""when a state action threatens to deprive a person of a protected liberty or property interest, a person is entitled to procedural due process.""). procedural due process requires notice and the opportunity for hearing appropriate to the nature of the case.

SOLUTION: non-overruling

PROBLEM: further, we reject use of the statutory definition of vessel in the lhwca as the basis for the definition of vessel under  905(b), as was done in lundy v. litton systems, inc., 624 f.2d 590 (5th cir. 1980), cert. denied, 450 u.s. 913, 101 s.ct. 1353, 67 l.ed.2d 337 (1981), and overrule the holding in trussell v. litton systems, inc., 753 f.2d 366, 367 (5th cir. 1985), that a hull under construction, located "on a building platform in a building-way within the shipyard," and not on navigable waters, was a vessel for  905(b) purposes.

SOLUTION:
overruling