We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

[EX Q]: I can't say a benevolent government produces benevolent people.
[EX A]: Invalid

[EX Q]: I trust the jury, and the trial / appeals process that we use prior to execution (although the appeals process needs some streamlining).
[EX A]: Valid

[EX Q]: The point is, when a crime is committed that warrants the death penalty and there is irrefutable evidence to suggest that the personal being held responsible is guilty, than they should be sentenced to death.
[EX A]:
Valid