Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.

[EX Q]: Dall sheep in Alaska are found on high, almost inaccessible mountains. But if you train your binoculars on them, they come down the mountain to see what the flashy thing is. After walking five or ten miles, they recognize a human and come over to say howdy. They might rub up against you as a form of greeting. Now if you've been rolling in the hay with your domestic sheep or goats, the little critters on you might get transferred to the wild sheep. This seems to be the most likely theory of how disease can be transferred. That's my story and I'm sticking to it.
[EX A]: No

[EX Q]: There is no reason to change anything but to use the CBR as it is meant to be used. To take from the people now is nonsense. Instituting a Tax of any kind is unrepresented of keeping with a smaller government. What is really happening in Juneau is another shell game designed to steal from the people without justification just scare tactics and greed.
[EX A]: No

[EX Q]: For now, I have confidence that rational American voters will put narcisist tRump in his place.  The American people have yet to hear HOW tRump plans to make America great when she hasn't lost her footing.  Campaign theories sound good in theory but lousy in practice.  Campaign theories fade away just like fireworks that dazzle for a few minutes and then shimmy away only to be forgotten until the next time.
[EX A]:
Yes