We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

Ex Input:
You can debate that without guns there would be more deaths to other weapons although you can't debate it would be to the same extent as gun murders and crimes would be.

Ex Output:
Valid


Ex Input:
What about the fact that the UK feels the need to ban knives and toy guns now?

Ex Output:
Valid


Ex Input:
So what difference does having a gun make when the eggers have guns too?

Ex Output:

Valid