In this task, you are given a passage which has a question and the context. You have to generate an answer to the question based on the information present in the context.

Example Input: Context: Intrathecal magnesium sulfate coinfusion with morphine increases antinociception in normal rats; however, because magnesium also delays the onset of tolerance, it is not clear whether this additional antinociception is a result of potentiated analgesia or tolerance abatement. We examined the antinociceptive interaction of intrathecal (IT) bolus magnesium sulfate and morphine in morphine naive rats and those with mechanical allodynia after a surgical incision. After intrathecal catheter implantation, rats were given preinjections of magnesium or saline, followed by injections of morphine or saline. In morphine naïve rats, IT bolus magnesium sulfate 281 and 375 microg followed by IT morphine 0.25 or 0.5 nmol enhanced peak antinociception and area under the response versus time curve two-to-three-fold in the tail-flick test as compared with morphine alone. Likewise, in rats with incisional pain, IT bolus magnesium sulfate 188 and 375 microg followed by morphine 0.5 nmol reduced mechanical allodynia, whereas morphine 0.5 nmol alone did not. This study suggests that IT magnesium sulfate potentiates morphine at a spinal site of action.\Question: Does magnesium sulfate potentiate morphine antinociception at the spinal level?
Example Output: Magnesium sulfate potentiates morphine analgesia when coadministered intrathecally in normal rats, and in an animal model of mechanical allodynia after a surgical incision. These results suggest that intrathecal administration of magnesium sulfate may be a useful adjunct to spinal morphine analgesia.

Example Input: Context: Trauma centers are currently benchmarked on mortality outcomes alone. However, pay-for-performance measures may financially penalize centers based on complications. Our objective was to determine whether the results would be similar to the current standard method of mortality-based benchmarking if trauma centers were profiled on complications.', 'We analyzed data from the National Trauma Data Bank from 2007 to 2010. Patients 16 years or older with blunt or penetrating injuries and an Injury Severity Score (ISS) of 9 or higher were included. Risk-adjusted observed-to-expected (O/E) mortality ratios for each center were generated and used to rank each facility as high, average, or low performing. We similarly ranked facilities on O/E morbidity ratios defined as occurrence of any major complication. Concordance between hospital performance rankings was evaluated using a weighted κ statistic. Correlation between morbidity- and mortality-based O/E ratios was assessed using Pearson coefficients. Sensitivity analyses were performed to mitigate the competing risk of death for the morbidity analyses.', 'A total of 449,743 patients from 248 facilities were analyzed. The unadjusted morbidity and mortality rates were 10.0% and 6.9%, respectively. No correlation was found between morbidity- and mortality-based O/E ratios (r = -0.01). Only 40% of the centers had similar performance rankings for both mortality and morbidity. Of the 31 high performers for mortality, only 11 centers were also high performers for morbidity. A total of 78 centers were ranked as average, and 11 ranked as low performers on both outcomes. Comparison of hospital performance status using mortality and morbidity outcomes demonstrated poor concordance (weighted κ = 0.03, p = 0.22).\Question: Does benchmarking trauma centers on mortality alone reflect quality of care : implications for pay-for-performance?
Example Output: Mortality-based external benchmarking does not identify centers with high complication rates. This creates a dichotomy between current trauma center profiling standards and measures used for pay-for-performance. A benchmarking mechanism that reflects all measures of quality is needed.

Example Input: Context: Our laboratory has demonstrated that significantly more cell-mediated immunosuppression occurs after full laparotomy than after either anesthesia control or carbon dioxide (CO2) pneumoperitoneum. We further demonstrated that the postoperative immunosuppression is related to the length of the incision. Other investigators believe that the immunosuppression observed after laparotomy is caused by peritoneal exposure to small amounts of lipopolysaccharide found in circulating air. They believe that the better-preserved immune function associated with laparoscopic surgery results from the avoidance of air contamination of the peritoneal cavity. To investigate this hypothesis, we determined and compared postoperative lymphocyte proliferation rates after (a) laparotomy in room air, (b) laparotomy in a CO2 chamber, (c) CO2 insufflation in a murine model, and (d) anesthesia alone.', 'Female C3H/He mice (n = 21) were divided randomly into four groups: (a) anesthesia control, (b) air laparotomy, (c) CO2 laparotomy, and (d) CO2 insufflation. The control mice underwent no procedure. The group 2 animals underwent a full midline incision (xiphoid to pubis) and exposure to room air for 20 min and then were clipped closed. The group 3 mice underwent a full midline incision in a sealed CO2 chamber for 20 min, and the group 4 mice insufflation with CO2 gas at 4 to 6 mm Hg for 20 min. Splenocytes were harvested from all the animals on day 2 after the interventions. Lymphocyte proliferation then was assessed using the nonradioactive colorimetric MTS/PMS system 72 h after concanavalin-A stimulation.', 'There was no significant difference in lymphocyte proliferation between the air and CO2 laparotomy groups. Lymphocyte proliferation in the anesthesia control and CO2 insufflation groups was significantly higher than in both the air laparotomy (p<0.05) and CO2 laparotomy (p<0.05) groups (p values by Tukey-Kramer test). There was no significant difference between the anesthesia control and CO2 pneumoperitoneum groups.\Question: Is lymphocyte proliferation in mice after a full laparotomy the same whether performed in a sealed carbon dioxide chamber or in room air?
Example Output:
Our results suggest that full laparotomy performed in a sealed CO2 chamber compared to room air laparotomy resulted in similar suppression of lymphocyte proliferation. Furthermore, no significant suppression of lymphocyte proliferation was observed in the CO2 pneumoperitoneum group. These results, with regard to lymphocyte proliferation rates, refute the hypothesis that postoperative immunosuppression is related to air exposure and support the alternative hypothesis that immunosuppression is related to incision length.