We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Ex Input:
Sent1: I dont believe that someone who killed or raped a lot of people should be able to live even if they are in a jail surrounded by other criminals.
 Sent2: What if there were people killing other people, escaping from jail, doing it again etc.

Ex Output:
Not similar


Ex Input:
Sent1: If someone is bad enough to be considered for the death penalty then they must have had sure evidence that they are guilty if they are then they shouldn't deserve the right to live among people they could kill
 Sent2: An argument for putting people to death is so that they can never escape and kill again.

Ex Output:
Not similar


Ex Input:
Sent1: I think the death penalty is one of the several punishment in the law system, we shouldn't consider it like something insane, and moreover it's normal in some countries nowadays.
 Sent2: I cannot compare numbers with other western countries since we are the only one with capital punishment.

Ex Output:

Not similar