In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

Ex Input:
Comment: Is there any specific reason you have to be so condescending? You seem to have a serious judgement problem to make a statement like I haven't read the article. If I didn't I wouldn't have known of your biased almost racist rant.  And you stated you "have seen people who have written.."  Really you saw them actually writing the comments?  Amazing or untrue.  You read what they wrote, you didn't see them writing. You seem confused.  Bad journalism.  As far a Sessions comment, you had your own explanation and I disagreed with you.  I guess no one can disagree with you because you are a journalist.  You write articles  and responses however you please, but if someone disagrees with your elitist condescending posts you get them ruled uncivil.  You have to hide behind CB I guess because of your feelings of inadequacy.  In your mind the posts are all wrong and you are right.  Most seem to agree with me.  Ever ask yourself why you feel you have to vehemently defend yourself all the time?

Ex Output:
Non-identity-attack


Ex Input:
Comment: Gay folk don't define themselves by sexual acts any more than heterosexuals to. It is the sodomy-obsessed gay-haters who try to impose such a definition.

Ex Output:
Identity-attack


Ex Input:
Comment: I expect your 13 yr. old eyes will open even wider in the near future when some left-leaning liberal accuses you of being racially intolerant merely on the basis of your skin colour.  

This past week I saw an image on television of a person marching against racism and intolerance.  She was carrying a sign that said, "white people suck."

Ex Output:

Identity-attack