In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine the neutral choice based on your inference from the statement and your commonsense knowledge. The neutral choice is a sentence that neither agrees nor disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3', corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence. If sentence X agrees with sentence Y, one's correctness follows from the other one. If sentence X disagrees with sentence Y, they can not be correct at the same time.

Input: Consider Input: Statement: where am i Choices: 1. Where am I? 2. What am I? 3. I'm in America. 

Output: 3


Input: Consider Input: Statement: The legislative history contains no evidence that Congress believed it was limiting legal representation of H-2A workers to the period when such workers were physically present in the United States. Choices: 1. There is no history that has evidence that Congress oppressed the workers. 2. There is a lot of legislative history backing up the limited legal representation. 3. Some people believe the H-2A workers were not treated with respect.

Output: 3


Input: Consider Input: Statement: and it still would have been every bit as accessible a movie for the kids if they had included all this stuff that i anyway as an as intellectual adult would appreciate it wouldn't have hurt the movie to do that and it would have make it uh broadened the audience that it could have been targeted for i thought but i um i'm i'm clearly enough you know i'm i'm clearly an intellectual snob to be going to these kinds of movies i realize that Choices: 1. Had the movie been more intellectual I would have enjoyed it better and so would a larger audience, serves me right for being an intellectual snob. 2. The kinds would have learnt so much if they'd just added a little bit more of a cerebral twist. 3. The movie went straight over my head, I didn't understand half of the intellectual references.


Output: 2