In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.
--------
Question: Comment: gj53 I'm with you on this one.  There are some pretty ignorant people here posting comments.   I guess that's why Chrysler/Jeep are still in business because if you like lipstick on pig (Jeep) you can get anyone to buy anything.  Proud owner of an 07 FJ 6spd with over 300,000km.  Doesn't burn a drop of oil, original diffs, transfer case, tie rod ends, wheel bearings etc......everything works.   Please go ask any Jeep owner (if they've even made it to that mileage) what they have had replaced in that time.  But please ignore the reliability record of this truck and buy a Jeep.  You'll love the garbage power train, weak towing capacity, zero interior room.  But you can work on your tan with your top down, listing to your passengers wine about how their backs hurt all the while sticking your leg out the doorless sides.....that is until your ecu fails, or starter, or alternator..........

Answer: Non-identity-attack


Question: Comment: The poor are easy targets.  Have fun, middle class assassins.

Answer: Identity-attack


Question: Comment: Well, for starters there's the fact that the taxi was found miles away from her destination, so we don't actually know she was coherent enough to do that. 

Plus, she was found unconscious at the time the taxi was found.  She obviously passed out at some point - that's not at issue (are you suggesting it is?). The issue is whether she passed out before or after her clothing was removed. 

And this is to say nothing of the fact that this cab driver had several previous complaints about sexual misconduct from female passengers. See the writeup of this case on CBC - there's a lot of useful background.

Answer:
Non-identity-attack