Given a passage with a context and an answer, construct a question on the basis of the information present in the passage. Construct the question in such a way that (i) it is unambiguous, (ii) it is answerable from the passage, (iii) its answer is unique (iv) it answer uses text phrases from the passage. Avoid creating questions that (i) can't be answered correctly without actually understanding the passage and (ii) uses the same words or phrases given in the passage.

Example Input: Context: No previous studies have investigated the psychiatric characteristics of patients with postherpetic neuralgia (PHN). Similarly, no studies have been performed on patients with different chronic somatic symptoms due to a defined medical disease to compare the characteristics of psychiatric morbidity associated with each etiology.', 'After completing the subscales of the Symptom Checklist 90-R, a psychiatrist administered the Diagnostic Interview Schedule to all subjects. The psychiatric comorbidity in 35 patients with pain due to PHN was compared with a control group of 34 patients with the nonpainful aversive symptom of vertigo due to a peripheral vestibular disorder that caused unilateral hypofunction.', 'PHN patients had significantly more symptoms of major depression and somatization disorder. No significant differences were found between groups for psychiatric diagnoses. Patients with PHN reported significantly less acutely distressing somatic symptoms.
Answer: These results suggest that the psychiatric symptoms of patients with PHN are distinct from nonspecific acute distress and may be related to the experience of suffering from chronic neuropathic pain. Patients with PHN may not meet criteria for a psychiatric diagnosis, but their psychiatric comorbidity places them at substantial risk for increased pain, suicidal ideation, sustained disability, and the numerous complications of excessive medical evaluation and treatment. Patients with PHN should be evaluated specifically for psychiatric symptoms to reduce potential negative consequences through appropriate treatment.
Example Output: Do psychiatric symptoms and distress differ between patients with postherpetic neuralgia and peripheral vestibular disease?

Example Input: Context: To determine the prevalence of fathers' attendance at pretest cancer genetic counseling sessions with mothers undergoing BRCA1/2 genetic testing for hereditary breast/ovarian cancer (HBOC) risk, and to identify psychosocial and other correlates of fathers' attendance.", 'One hundred and twenty-one fathers of minor-age children who were spouses/partners of women (mothers) undergoing such counseling and testing were recruited, completed a behavioral self-report survey, and provided data about their sociodemographic backgrounds, father-child cancer communication histories, parenting relationship quality, and information-seeking and perceived knowledge.', 'A total of 27.3% of fathers attended pretest cancer genetic counseling with mothers. Compared to fathers who did not attend pretest cancer genetic counseling, those who did had stronger parenting alliances with mothers, were more likely to have sought out information about BRCA1/2 testing, and felt more informed about testing. In an adjusted logistic regression model of session attendance, the strength of the parenting alliance was associated with a 6% increase in the likelihood of attending genetic counseling (odds ratio [OR]=1.06, 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.01, 1.12, p<.05) and greater perceived knowledge about BRCA1/2 testing was associated with a four-fold increase in the likelihood of session attendance (OR=4.03, CI=1.77, 9.37, p<.001).
Answer: One in three fathers attend pretest cancer genetic counseling with mothers undergoing BRCA1/2 testing; those who do have closer parenting relationships and are more informed about BRCA1/2 testing.
Example Output: Does prevalence and correlate of mothers and fathers attending pretest cancer genetic counseling together?

Example Input: Context: Self-reported health-related quality of life (HRQL) and changes in HRQL have been shown to predict mortality and/or adverse events in patients with coronary artery disease. MacNew Heart Disease HRQL questionnaire scores were examined as predictors of 4-year all-cause mortality.', 'Following referral for angioplasty in 385 patients with coronary artery disease, data were analyzed for differences in all-cause mortality by MacNew Global and subscale baseline and 1- and 3-month change scores (deteriorated ≥0.50; unchanged (-0.49 to +0.49); and improved ≥0.50 points).', 'Mean baseline, 1-month, and 3-month MacNew Global and subscale scores were similar in survivors and non-survivors. Mean 1- and 3-month Global and emotional subscale and mean 1-month social subscale change scores decreased more in non-survivors than survivors. Compared with patients whose Global MacNew HRQL scores improved at one month, 4-year all-cause mortality hazard ratio (HR) was higher in patients whose HRQL deteriorated (HR, 1.70, 95% CI, 1.09, 2.65; p=0.021). Compared with patients whose Global MacNew HRQL improved at three months, 4-year all-cause mortality was higher in both patients whose HRQL had deteriorated (HR, 2.07, 95% CI, 1.29, 3.32; p=0.003) and patients with unchanged HRQL (HR, 2.62, 95% CI, 1.11, 6.17; p=0.028).
Answer: A deterioration of ≥0.50 points in MacNew HRQL Global scores at both one and three months is predictive of 4-year all-cause mortality. Serial HRQL information may be useful to identify patients at higher risk for adverse cardiac events and mortality and may have implications for determining follow-up frequency and treatment in individual patients.
Example Output:
Does change in health-related quality of life in patients with coronary artery disease predict 4-year mortality?