The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.
--------
Question: Context: 'oh dear, I am sorry to hear that my son is type one, I am okay with giving you all the food if you could give me all the firewood. I have hypothyroidism and it makes me get cold.' 'That's a deal. ' 'now how to split the water, wish it wasn't an odd number'
Utterance: 'I'll take 1 and you can have 2 since you gave me all the food.'

Answer: No


Question: Context: 'if u had hungry means what will u do. u need food. right. hehehe' 'I'm willing to give more food to you in exchange for more water since not everybody in my group eats a lot. How about this: I take 2 waters, 1 food, 1 firewood and you can get everything else?' 'ok i accept  ur thoughts.sharing is good habit'
Utterance: 'Perfect 🙂 I think that sounds like a good deal for both of us!'

Answer: No


Question: Context: 'Hi! I was hoping to get 2 packages of firewood, 2 packages of water and 1 package of food and you can have the rest.'
Utterance: 'Hello. Is there a reason you prefer more water and firewood to food?'

Answer:
No