In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Ex Input:
Comment: What a joy to read the Demo Liberals squawk about Republican spoils being passed out.  Spoils distribution has been going on since the USA was founded.  Would you expect Trump to appoint Doug Chin to be US Attorney for Hawaii?  These liberal local yokels will always be crying their nonsensical songs until January 2025, when term limits law requires a new POTUS.  By then, maybe Paul Ryan may be elected to succeed DJT.  Ha! Ha! Ha!  ALOHA AND IMUA..

Ex Output:
Non-obscene


Ex Input:
Comment: Sue his ass amen! The PERMANENT fund dividend is based off a system that replenishes its self every year. If we don't have as good of a year then the PFD would be less. Based off a 5 year average. He wants to cut the money that we would be putting back into the economy to bail out the states fuck ups. How about the state pay for there own mistakes and stop with all the dump road projects like upgrading our high way to 6-8 lanes. We don't need that. Slow down take your time or drive a different rout. Or all the money there wasting on bridges to no where. Or there own salaries. Don't cut the PFD.

Ex Output:
Obscene


Ex Input:
Comment: Damn , that global warming/ climate change ...snake oil crap ; Mother Nature doesn't watch your silly movies or listen to your BS.

Ex Output:

Obscene