In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: threat and non-threat. Threat is a statement that someone will be hurt or harmed, especially if the person does not do something in particular.

[Q]: Comment: Sure "Carl"...except that Crimea is really Tatar.  It was taken over by Russia in 1783 and the local population resettled and murdered.  Your pro russian, anti Ukrainian bias is glaringly apparent.
[A]: Non-threat


[Q]: Comment: I think I can grasp your feelings quite well. A woman makes some bad choices, putting her in this horrific gang rape situation, "Well it's her fault. She shouldn't have gotten drunk and left willingly with them. She should've known she'd be gang raped." If you were to look back at what you said and compared it to what you say you "feel", don't you agree that you're being hypocritical? Just saying the obvious. Victim blaming is victim blaming is victim blaming. There are no ifs or buts.
[A]: Non-threat


[Q]: Comment: It just seems like the DOW did not want to do their job and trap this bear. It's obvious the bear is foraging for food, so don't trap and release it... NO let's just murder it. Let's kill it for attacking food.
[A]:
Threat