We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

[Q]: Morality aside, no evidence of deterrence aside, the death penalty costs more than life imprisonment.
[A]: Valid


[Q]: So should we be able to impose the sentence of life without parole, all the while understanding that we may have put an innocent man in prison for life?
[A]: Valid


[Q]: The "Central Park Jogger" case involved a person who confessed who probably was guilty.
[A]:
Valid