We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

[EX Q]: Sent1: Do you think that a gun-ban in the long run would mean that more criminals get their hands on guns or that less criminals get their hands on guns?
 Sent2: Gun haters think banning guns will make criminals stop being criminals.
[EX A]: Not similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: School district employees should not be carrying weapons on campus, just as students should not be carrying weapons."
 Sent2: You propose to abolish gun free zones, and allow people to carry guns into schools.
[EX A]: Not similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: If this is the case then gun control laws will have no effect on who carries melee weapons, so you argument falls apart because 'the law abiding' can remain armed.
 Sent2: It is asserted, therefore, that the D.C. gun control laws irrationally prevent only law abiding citizens from owning handguns.
[EX A]:
Not similar