TASK DEFINITION: In this task, you're given a statement, and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence clearly disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3' corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.
PROBLEM: Statement: so you know plus less bags less waste Choices:  1. As well as less usage of bags that end up as waste, thereby reducing waste as well. 2. Producing fewer bags and waste was the intended result of the system. 3. You probably are aware that there will be many more bags and a ton more waste.

SOLUTION: 3

PROBLEM: Statement: It means that instead of blandly assuming less regulation is better than more or more competition is better than less, you have to study the specifics of each case very carefully. Choices:  1. Studying the specifics of every case is what it means. 2. If you don't study the specifics, you won't get it right. 3. There's no need to study the specifics, not at all.

SOLUTION: 3

PROBLEM: Statement: Those who were too cynical to challenge the ways of the world, too preoccupied with the past to see the present, and too obsessed with who was wrong to recognize what was right. Choices:  1. There are no cynical people that didn't challenge the ways of the world. 2. Their way to see the world harmed them in a scale that they didn't progress. 3. There were people that were too preoccupied with the past to see the present.

SOLUTION:
1