instruction:
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
question:
I don't think MJ would will be behind this. This was a brazen thing to do in daylight. Almost as if he cased or was aware of neighborhood time schedules. It maybe he was unaware of occupant being home. Chances are he just checked house to see if anyone was home before ransacking it. I would want revenge tho if he killed my dog! They have had others stealing mail and knocking on doors resently.
answer:
No


question:
It is in the Constitution.  If they pay you 'reasonable market value' the 5th Amendment says it's fine.  

The latest US Supreme Court decision justifies a City taking your land even if they just sell it to another business so the City can get more tax revenue from it.
answer:
No


question:
According to the Oregon Business Registry, there is no such group, non-profit or commercial, called Oregonians for High School Success that could accept this huge donation from Stand for Children. If there is, could you please provide some information about who is running it? To me, it appears that the group is a fabrication of Stand for Children. Can you produce any information about this group that does not stem from the Stand for Children or IP-65 websites? A Facebook page doesn't count.

The petition is being floated by Direct Action Partners, a signature-gathering business that boasts a website with next to no information. DAP is using dubious tactics to persuade unsuspecting citizens to sign on without explaining the initiative.

Can you do more than lip service to this issue -- a real investigative piece? We're talking billions of our tax dollars here. As K Alman stated in her comment, dark money abounds at SFC. This whole thing doesn't smell right.
answer:

No