TASK DEFINITION: Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
PROBLEM: Test on humans. We're animals too.  But oh, right, we're "special" animals because ... why?

SOLUTION: No

PROBLEM: True enough.  Alas, for many conservatives the world can only be black or white, and Mr. Trump is Dubya on steroids.  Not only are you "against me" if you're not "for me," you're a loser and stupid and (choose your Trump invective here).  Hyperbole should no longer be tempered:  Mr. Trump is a "leader" in the same vein as Hitler and Mussolini.  Consistently deprecating (and increasingly openly violent toward) to those who not only disagree with him, but are doing their jobs (or not) as journalists.  Not simply a cartoonish narcissistic blowhard, but a rallying point for the ignorant, angry and uninformed.  There will be violence, and worse, coming from the Trump camp, I fear.  The Republican party created this monster in 50 years since Nixon (both their racist, misogynist, homophobic "core" and the individual now leading them), and when you sleep with dogs, you get fleas.  They have no idea where to scratch, which is both gratifyingly hilarious and frightening.

SOLUTION: Yes

PROBLEM: Karl, even if they took the entire PFD, it is all spent already and they still have not closed the gap completely. they will implement a tax(s), at which point people will begin to evaluate the costs of living in Alaska to greener pastures in the South. I for one love Alaska, but if they steal to much of my income, I am not apposed to relocating elsewhere where my hard earned dollar will go farther. the state MUST cut and then cut some more before asking us to cut our standard of living. does it seem fair that they will require us to cut our budgets but do nothing meaningful with theirs?

SOLUTION:
No