TASK DEFINITION: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.
PROBLEM: Well, if you believe that this is a 'natural right' it only applies to non-Catholics, and is conditional by the law.

SOLUTION: Valid

PROBLEM: If Africa has no Second Amendment, and thus no legal right for anyone to have access to guns, and thus no legal ground for having gun shops, then why are these guerrillas getting their munitions?

SOLUTION: Valid

PROBLEM: If anything, it has ruled in favor of gun control, saying in the Miller case that "The Second Amendment must be interpreted and applied with a view to its purpose of rendering effective the Militia."

SOLUTION:
Valid