In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

Example Input: Comment: You are ridiculously uninformed. For your sake, sorry the Gov. is going to veto the LIO Taj Mahawker that you said we should buy a few weeks back, which tells me all I need to know about your ability to rationalize coherently and responsibly.
Example Output: Non-identity-attack

Example Input: Comment: Well, I'm going to go to job fairs. Sad to work for all these years and loose my shirt because of someone else's planning incompetence, especially when I did that kind of work before I retired. I must say though Grabby's replacement seems to be able to manage better, but it's not going to save my retirement. Over 4 decades working and saving and investing, poof. May those brainwashed fool's running things get a long trip to the Federal vacation home in Lompoc. I'll be happy to pay for that tax burden.
Example Output: Non-identity-attack

Example Input: Comment: Excellent article !

But please do forgive me for pointing out that all of the "Green Energy" ( solar, wind ) in the G&M ( by way of a typical media example ) have been agenda driven by the Ontario Liberals and the thereby subsidized solar and wind generation industries - devoid of any deeper STEM and economic context rationales. Independent, critical and informed journalism MIA ...

The generally STEM incompetent popular media are the most notorious celebrity noise driven anti-science agenda perpetrators !!
Example Output:
Non-identity-attack