The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.
--------
Question: Context: 'I need firewood, because I have a medical condition that causes my veins to close if I get too cold at night. I don't mind sharing the water.' 'I could give you 1 firewood, 2 waters, and 1 food. ' 'If you make it two food, we have a deal.'
Utterance: 'I would rather let you have the third water than other food. I don't like fish. ☹️'

Answer: No


Question: Context: 'I am ready to give 1 amount of food for you. But I want some quantity of water and firewood for me.' 'I would take 3 packages of food and just 1 package of water. Is it okay for you?' 'No, I don't take this. Because food is important for my child and me.'
Utterance: 'Try to understand our situation. We had food a week back. We were drinking only water for the whole week. We are dying of hunger. Kindly understand our situation.'

Answer: Yes


Question: Context: 'Hey! I'd like some more firewood to keep my doggo warm. What do you need?' 'I need firewood as well. We have a large group consisting of mostly senior citizens, including my grandma, so we'd like the firewood to keep everyone warm.' 'I see. 😮 What are you least interested in?'
Utterance: 'We can make do without extra water. Can we trade two waters for an extra firewood package and an extra food package?'

Answer:
No