We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

[EX Q]: Sent1: You are probably going to murder somebody; hopefully it will b in a place with the death penalty and then you will get what you deserve.
 Sent2: If you think there shouldn't be a death penalty, you're an idiot.
[EX A]: Not similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: You have just shown your position why we should use the death penalty, but i have not seen the solution for people who are making crime?
 Sent2: No, if it is already known that this person made the crime, the death penalty may be used.
[EX A]: Not similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: So, in summary, you aren't against the death penalty on principle.
 Sent2: And hey, if you think man is just an animal, then the death penalty shouldn't matter to you since you can't say life has any intrinsic value (remember, you believe in relativity).
[EX A]:
Not similar