Given a document, an entity and its sentiment towards the entity, verify if it is the correct sentiment towards the entity. Answer should be yes or no. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

[EX Q]: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Allen Iverson is Neutral . Coach Mike D'Antoni  in particular  was initially enthusiastic about the idea. Walsh had to be convinced. Yet they were so close to making the leap that  as of early Thursday evening  people close to the team were convinced that Iverson was on his way.
 Not surprisingly  there were concerns about Iverson's character. He left his last two teams  Memphis and Detroit  amid controversy. While renowned for his passion on the court  he is infamous for his poor work habits. As the Knicks dug further  they became increasingly concerned about off-court issues  and that concern influenced the final decision. Iverson's agent  Leon Rose  did not return messages on Friday.
 James L. Dolan  the Madison Square Garden chairman  was opposed to Iverson from the start  according to a person who was briefed on the deliberations  but indicated that he would not veto the move if Walsh and D'Antoni wanted to make it.
 The Knicks might have been Iverson's last  best hope to salvage his career and his reputation. Iverson  in turn  might have represented the Knicks' best hope for providing fans with a little excitement.
 "I'm always concerned about that " Walsh said of disappointing the fans. "But I don't think you can build a basketball team based on polls."
[EX A]: no

[EX Q]: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Sarah Huckabee Sanders is Positive . Sarah Huckabee Sanders  lied about baking a chocolate pecan pie for Thanksgiving. The White House press secretary further ruined the national holiday by humiliating the press corps by asking them why they are grateful. While none of this is true   attacking Sanders  personally has become the media’s latest and lowest method of attacking President Trump.
“Piegate” started after  Sanders  shared a picture on Thursday of a chocolate pecan pie with the caption   “I dont cook much these days  but managed this Chocolate Pecan Pie for Thanksgiving at the family farm!” April Ryan  the American Urban Radio Networks correspondent and a CNN political analyst  tweeted at  Sanders  the next day: “Show it to us on a table.” She then added  “I am not trying to be funny but folks are already saying #piegate and #fakepie Show it to us on the table with folks eating it and a pic of you cooking it.” Ryan’s insinuation that  Sanders  used a stock photo launched a viral debate involving every nook and cranny of the crust and glazed pecan top of the pie.
 Sanders  responded to the second tweet with grace: “Don’t worry @AprilDRyan because I’m nice I’ll bake one for  you  next week ;-) #RealPie #FakeNews.”
Ryan’s fake news was so influential that other liberal media kept the rolling pin going. On Saturday  MSNBC’s Joy Reid  said she “cannot verify whether or not  Sanders  baked that pie.” Did anyone at MSNBC call the White House and ask? Fox News’s Todd Stearns did  and  Sanders  told him  “Of course I made the pie.” She added that  “I make it for every holiday family gathering and have for years.”
 Sanders  was also attacked for asking reporters  in a pre-Thanksgiving briefing  to state what they were thankful for before asking their questions.  Sanders  started by saying she was thankful for  among other things  the people in the room  her faith and family. Reporters almost all responded in kind  which gave the usually antagonistic briefing room a kinder atmosphere.
 Sanders  is a practicing Christian  who prays before she does the daily briefing  so one would think she would be given the benefit of the doubt in understanding this as a good-will effort to transcend partisanship.
Piling on  his colleague Kathleen Parker said  Sanders ’s request was “candy-coating her usual condescension with faux fellowship.” Parker used the rest of her column to criticize every aspect of  Sanders ’s professional skills and recommended that she be replaced with — naturally — a journalist.
The Thanksgiving nastiness wasn’t even the lowest the media sank in its attacks on  Sanders .
Earlier this month  Los Angeles Times writer David Horsey began his piece: “ Sarah Huckabee Sanders  does not look like the kind of woman Donald Trump would choose as  his  chief spokesperson.”  He  went on to say  she  “looks more like a slightly chunky soccer mom who organizes snacks for the kids’ games.”
The backlash to this piece  especially the reference to  Sanders ’s weight  was so swift that the Times deleted all of it from the column and added an apology from the author. This is not standard procedure in newspapers. The as-written text normally stays in the piece  unless factually incorrect. There’s no way the Times did this because it cares about Trump supporters. It cares about female readership. And we don’t like men judging our weight and appearance at work.
The media hostility toward  Sanders  really has nothing to do with her but stems from its barely concealed hatred for Trump. So they want a Trump spokesperson to perform badly. But  Sanders  is effective in the way she does not give an inch in defense of the president  while keeping her cool and appearing unfazed. That means she gives the media few sound bites to nourish liberal cable shows and late-night television. She ducks and dodges when needed  which is part of the job.
 Sanders  has thick skin and a strong faith. None of these personal attacks appear to get to her  no matter how low and mean. She knows her purpose is to defend and promote the policies of the president and the administration. At some point  the elite pundit class in the media will realize that in attacking  Sanders   they are the ones who end up looking bad.
[EX A]: yes

[EX Q]: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Benny Cunningham's is Negative . Watch the replay of  Benny Cunningham's  23-yard catch-and-run in the second quarter  and two things become clear.
Two   he  screwed up trying to do so.
Let's review: As  Cunningham  juked  his  way to the front right corner of the end zone   he  dove and extended the ball while Packers safety Marwin Evans shoved him out of bounds.  Cunningham  crashed into the pylon as the ball slipped free. Officials ruled  Cunningham  out at the 2-yard line.
"We're taught not to do it; unless it's fourth down  you don't reach the ball out  " Cunningham  said. "But  honestly  at the time  I wasn't thinking about that. I was trying to score a touchdown for the team."
 Fox   under advice from  his  assistants who help with video reviews  challenged the ruling that  Cunningham  stepped out of bounds.
"Every indication we had was  he  scored  " Fox  said. "And  if anything   he  would be at the 1 or inside in the 1."
So rather than have  his  offense line up with three tries from the 2-yard line   Fox  threw the challenge flag with hopes of being awarded a touchdown or  at worst  having the ball advanced a few feet.
But replays showed  Cunningham  lost possession before  he  hit the pylon  which  in the context of the video review  had unintended consequences.
Replay officials in New York decided  Cunningham  lost possession before  he  was out of bounds and before  he  hit the pylon.
"When I watched the review  I felt like they made the right call "  Cunningham  said. "Just a bad play on my part  but the refs got it right."
To  Fox   the fumble wasn't as obvious.
"I think maybe on 50 times  like some people get to look at it  I think maybe you could see that "  he  said. "But on our look during the game  that wasn't really even discussed."
Here's the thing  though:  Cunningham 's left foot dragged onto the sideline as  he  dove for the pylon.
Slow down the replay frame-by-frame and it's still nearly impossible to determine if  Cunningham  lost possession before  his  foot touched the sideline. What's more  as Dean Blandino  the NFL's former head of officiating  explained on Fox Sports  the determining factor should have been whether  Cunningham  was in contact with the ball while  he  was out of bounds and before  he  hit the pylon.
"Even if  he  doesn't have control  and  he 's just touching that loose ball with a foot out of bonds  that would make the play dead prior to it hitting the pylon  and it would not be a touchback."
In that case  the Bears should have retained possession where  Cunningham  fumbled  the 2.
[EX A]:
no