In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Q: Comment: “What did all those investigations lead to? WHAT? The Republicans investigated the crap out of all of those conspiracies and what charges did they bring?”

To paraphrase the famous battle cry of John Paul Jones who had asked for a fast ship to go in harms way, “We have not yet BEGUN to investigate Felony-Shrillary”.

Don’t be surprised if the Mueller investigation you lefties lusted after for so long begins to shine the lamp of truth on what Felony-Shrillary did and why she did it - - how fitting THAT would be, eh wot? Hoist on YOUR petard!

A: Obscene
****
Q: Comment: hell fucking NO

A: Obscene
****
Q: Comment: Reread what happened. The man walked back to his vehicle after asking the question. As for blame, I would point to the constant stream of negativity and anger coming from left leaning publications. This shooter was 'a crazy' as many of the other mass shooters are. He was very deliberate in his actions. Then you state that it does not mean all Dems feel this way which I can agree with, but you then carry on to imply 'all Rs' as you finish. Can you see the double standard in your words.

A:
Non-obscene
****