instruction:
In this task, you will be shown a sentence, and you should determine whether it is overruling or non-overruling. In law, an overruling sentence is a statement that nullifies a previous case decision as a precedent by a constitutionally valid statute or a decision by the same or higher ranking court which establishes a different rule on the point of law involved. Classify your answers into overruling or non-overruling
question:
however, to the extent that national wildlife suggests that an eis must be prepared where the government has not surrendered its absolute right to prevent the use of resources, national wildlife is in conflict with conner, and is therefore not persuasive precedent.
answer:
overruling


question:
that is because ""if counsel has failed to conduct a reasonable investigation to prepare for sentencing, then he cannot possibly be said to have made a reasonable decision as to what to present at sentencing.""
answer:
non-overruling


question:
for the same reason, we disapprove dictum in people v. rivera (1985) 41 cal.3d 388 [ 221 cal.rptr. 562, 710 p.2d 362] to the effect that the rule of burton, supra, 6 cal.3d 375, survives the high court's holding in fare, supra, 442 u.s. 707, as a "component of the state constitutional privilege against self-incrimination."
answer:

overruling