In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.

Example Input: Comment: I guesstimated it would take three years for the current gov't to start to go off the rails.  Too many dumb promises that sounded good but were more complicated than suggested during the election.

Looks like they were over achievers in that regard.
Example Output: Agree

Example Input: Comment: Horrors- the GG spoke her mind and told some truths that people need to hear. Most people seem to be ok with her trashing junk medicine and climate change denial, but react with horror when she calls out Creationism. 
    Well - hey! Too bad 'Christians', 'Muslims' etc etc.  Come up with any evidence at all and you might have a talking point. Your bronze age mythology is a horror and slows human progress.
Example Output: Disagree

Example Input: Comment: As an Ottawa dude, I'm not surprised at your anti-Donny rant. All you lefties in that most left wing of all cities haven't really dealt with the new political reality which is the rise of the radical Right through out the industrial world. So, good bye to the man made climate change scam and a restoration of free speech.
Example Output:
Disagree