TASK DEFINITION: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.
PROBLEM: Comment: You don't want a discussion, you want to explain these terrorist attacks away by blaming it all on the West.
If it's all the West's fault, why are these terrorist organizations killing more Muslims than Westerners? Why are they forcing Arabs to adhere to their strict interpretation of Islam? Why are they raping Arab  girls, enslaving Arab women, mass killing Arab men?
Explain why  ISIL wants to create a caliphate from legitimate ,recognized countries? You have not once acknowledged that ISIL is responsible for many of these attacks, and they cannot be considered an organization representing your average Arab. Unless, you try to twist the argument to fit your narrative.
You're argument is coloured by your obvious hatred for the Jews, so you do not have a pertinent argument; otherwise, you would have used it.

SOLUTION: Identity-attack

PROBLEM: Comment: The ideology of Islam is in direct conflict with the constitution on many counts. It is unconstitutional to let muslims into the US.

SOLUTION: Identity-attack

PROBLEM: Comment: "But then we would also be publicly beheading drug addicts, along with adulterers, homosexuals and "sorcerers.""

Well, Richard, that's a leap.  Is that true of Singapore? Would that be true of BC? Talk about hoisting...talk about "your own petard."

SOLUTION:
Identity-attack