Given a document and an entity the task is to select the author's sentiment towards the entity. Sentiments can be Positive, Neutral and Negative. Select Positive if the article expresses a positive view towards the given entity or praises its quality or skills. Select Neutral if the document expresses no clear view towards the entity or has equal amounts of positive and negative statements or expressing some fact/quote by someone else. Select Negative if the article expresses a negative view towards like harsh remarks, criticizing entities action/decision etc. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

Ex Input:
What is the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Bain ? Logo of  the Bain Capital  is screened at a news conference in Tokyo  Japan September 28  2017. REUTERS/Kim Kyung-Hoon
TOKYO  (Reuters) - U.S. private equity firm Bain Capital  aims to buy Japanâs third-largest advertising agency  Asatsu-DK Inc (9747.T)  for 152 billion yen ($1.35 billion) in one of the largest buyouts in Japan this year  it said on Monday.
 Bain  plans to buy all of Asatsu-DKâs shares from existing holders  including top shareholder WPP (WPP.L)  for 3 660 yen a share  a 15.4 percent premium over Mondayâs close.
 The private equity firm  said  it  would launch a tender offer on Tuesday and plans to delist  the company . The buyout will be canceled if it fails to buy a stake larger than 50.1 percent.
Asatsu-DK supports Bainâs offer  saying that a strategic review had found that private ownership represented the best option to position the company for sustainable growth.
âIn collaboration with  Bain Capital   we will set a course towards bold structural reforms and growth strategies that will help us to enhance our competitiveness and to expand our market share  both in Japan and overseas â said President and Group CEO Shinichi Ueno.
The bid comes only days after a Bain-led consortium signed an $18 billion deal to buy Toshiba Corpâs (6502.T) microchip business.
A source close to WPP said the buyout plan as outlined by Bain significantly undervalued Asatsu-DK.

Ex Output:
Positive


Ex Input:
What is the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Henry Walker ? A worker pushes shopping carts in front of a Walmart store in La Habra  Calif. ( Jae C. Hong/AP)
Army veteran Henry Walker  was trying to buy a watermelon at a Walmart in Alabama when  his  foot got stuck in a wooden pallet. When  he  turned  the 59-year-old fell  breaking  his  hip.
 Walker  sued Walmart over the 2015 incident  and an Alabama jury has ruled that  he  should be awarded $7.5 million.
The incident unfolded June 25  2015  when  Walker  went to a Walmart store in Phenix City  Ala.  according to court documents.
 Walker  reached to pick a melon from a display  and  his  foot became lodged in the pallet under the watermelon container.  He  turned  unaware that the pallet was there  and fell and shattered  his  hip  court documents state.
 He  sued the retail giant on claims of negligence and wantonness. Attorneys presented the case Tuesday and Wednesday in Russell County Circuit Court.
The jury deliberated for about two hours late Wednesday before ruling in favor of  Walker   awarding him $2.5 million in compensatory damages and $5 million in punitive damages.
âI think this jury appreciated what  Mr. Walker  went through and they compensated  him  accordingly â another one of  his  attorneys  David Rayfield  told the Ledger-Enquirer. âThis is a great verdict for the community because this jury wanted to make sure it was safe for shoppers.â
Jurors reviewed security footage from the store and saw that  Walker  wasnât the only person to get  his  foot stuck in the side openings of a wooden pallet on the floor  OâHara said.
OâHara told AL.com that the incident âcompletely changed  Henry Walker âs life.â Among other things  the Army veteran who used to play basketball three days a week now needs to use a walker  he said.

Ex Output:
Neutral


Ex Input:
What is the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Mark Richt ? MIAMI GARDENS â  Mark Richt  made contact with an official while arguing with  him  during the first half of the Miami Hurricanesâ 34-24 Orange Bowl loss to Wisconsin on Saturday night.
After first bumping the head linesman   Richt  was flagged for an unsportsmanlike conduct penalty. As the flag dropped  he  grabbed at the officialâs arm and continued to shout in  his  face. The penalty set the Badgers up for first-and-goal at the Miami 5-yard line  eventually leading to a touchdown that put Wisconsin up 24-14 before halftime.
After the game   Richt  expressed remorse for the way  he  conducted  himself  but not for being upset with the officiating.
"I know I lost my cool. I thought rightfully so  as far as being mad  but not rightfully so using some of the language I used "  Richt  said. "Not particularly proud of  myself  there. I apologize to anybody who can read lips."
Among other things   Richt  was upset with Wisconsin linemen getting away with holding on Miami defenders. The play that drew  his  heated reaction was one where senior edge rusher Trent Harris appeared to be held with a clear path to Wisconsin quarterback Alex Hornibrook  who ended up converting the third-and-long to extend the drive.
When asked postgame what  he  was arguing with the referee about   Richt  asked the reporter to guess. The reporter said  "Iâm thinking it had to do with holding."
 Mark Richt  admits  he 's not proud of the way  he  reacted to a bad call during Orange Bowl loss. (Joe Skipper/AP)
 Richt  replied: "Well  there were a few things similar to that. I didnât agree with a lot of things that were called or not called."
 He  added it was more about the non-calls than what was called and that  he  felt it continued through the end of the game.
"It was a shame in my opinion  but Iâm probably not supposed to say that "  Richt  said.

Ex Output:

Negative