In this task, you're given a statement, and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence clearly disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3' corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.

[Q]: Statement: The trend toward interpretive installation, aimed at broadening art's appeal by expanding public understanding, paralleled the transformation of museum-going from serious cultural pursuit to highbrow entertainment. Choices:  1. The museum shifted to highbrow entertainment to help broaden art's appeal. 2. The museum shifted to highbrow entertainment to help broaden modern art's appeal. 3. The museum closed down because they couldn't broaden art's appeal.
[A]: 3


[Q]: Statement: It said this possibly reflected concerns about a planned amendment to the Irish Constitution that would make Irish reunification contingent on majority consent in Ulster. Choices:  1. The Irish constitution was being amended 2. There were lawyers involved in the amendment process 3. The Scottish had a say in the Irish amendments
[A]: 3


[Q]: Statement: But, in fact, there is no assurance that Greenspan and his colleagues have any actual intention of behaving in this way, nor any persuasive evidence that they have done so in the past. Choices:  1. Greenspan and his colleagues were caught behaving this way in the past and there is absolute proof of it.  2. Greenspan and his colleagues have definitely behaved this way in the past, they just didn't get caught.  3. It is unclear to some whether Greenspan and his colleagues actually intend to behave in this way. 
[A]:
1