The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.

Input: Consider Input: Context: 'I would love as much food as is available. I would also appreciate excess firewood, as I get cold.' 'Okay, it seems we both have the same priorities in food most and firewood second most. How about this, you take 2 packages of food, I will take 1. You give me 2 packages of firewood I will give you 1. We will then divide the water. Is that fair?' 'That sounds really fair! 🙂'
Utterance: 'Would you be willing to give me 2 water and you take 1?'

Output: No


Input: Consider Input: Context: 'good excellent choice' 'so how do you want to divide the firewood' 'take 2 firewood if you wish'
Utterance: 'sure, deal'

Output: No


Input: Consider Input: Context: 'Did you bring any water to start?' 'Yes! Did you bring any food to start?' 'I did, but my friend only feels comfortable with extra around, God forbid, if something happens this could save his life. So I'm thinking, I take all three food packages, two firewood packages and leave all three water and one firewood for you. '
Utterance: 'I think that it is fair that you get three food and I get three water, but why should you get two firewood to my one?'


Output: No