We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

[Q]: Only someone who can justify killing a baby for the irresponsible acts of a woman can compare killing one to weeding a garden.
[A]: Invalid


[Q]: In the case where the intent and means to kill are present and no alternative presents itself, no.
[A]: Invalid


[Q]: If a dog bit a human, they would be put down, so why no do the same to a human?
[A]:
Valid