Craft one incorrect answer. In doing so, try to use words from the context as much as possible, or by using similar words used in the correct answer. DO NOT craft nonsensical or off-topic incorrect answers, such that the incorrect answers can be directly excluded without reasoning according to the context. Try to make your responses similar to the given correct answer. To this end, try to keep both the length and the style as similar as possible between the correct and the incorrect answer. To make your incorrect answers more difficult, try to incorporate words from context. To avoid being predictable or repetitive, try to add more variations and complexity.

Example Input: Context: This was all going on to the soundtrack of the " English speaking tour guide " we 'd all paid 300 bhat for ( roughly a fiver ) who did n't so much speak English as slur some vaguely European sounding syllables together . I was sitting about 6 feet away from him and I still could n't make it out . But he was very jovial and he got his important points across ( be back on the boat by THREE PM or I leave you ! ) and he was also dressed like he got out of bed about 3 seconds before the boat left , so it was hard to be cheesed at him . 
Question: What may have been the type of tour we were paying 300 bhat for ? 
Correct Answer: We were going on a water vessel as part of the sightseeing admission .
Example Output: We were touring a famous recording facility that made a popular soundtrack .

Example Input: Context: I had my photoshoot on Sunday and I was sooo happy to get it over with . The anticipation was causing me a lot of stress ; like the weeks preceding a highschool reunion or someone 's wedding . You plan to get your outfit perfect and yourself in shape before the day but you always end up pulling everything together at the last minute . 
Question: Why was the photoshoot causing me stress ? 
Correct Answer: None of the above choices .
Example Output: I got a pimple a few days before and was freaking out .

Example Input: Context: The " stories " that are emerging in the 2008 election are examples of the poison of postmodernism and its erosion of the values attendant on the critical distinction between veracity and mendacity . Truth too often is buried by the narrative , while lies are carried by it and transmuted into conventional wisdom . Presidential candidates in their roles as communicators often elide facts and nuance in the interest of advancing their narrative . The same goes for promoters throughout the culture , tin plated philosophers , game theory economists , and marketeers advancing their causes or beliefs regardless of factual constraints . 
Question: What may be true about me ? 
Correct Answer: I am well informed in social matters .
Example Output:
I am well informed in historical matters .