instruction:
In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: toxic and non-toxic. Toxicity is defiend as anything that is rude, disrespectful, or unreasonable that would make someone want to leave a converation.
question:
Comment: CommonWetDreams.org is a completely lame citation.

Try some hard facts instead, It was desperate and huge turnout by white evangelicals in the "firewall" states that put Trump over. 

These fanatics were hardly going to vote for Sanders, who was even more aligned with the "Black Devil" in the White House.

Clinton won the vote of the lower income segment and all race/cultural minorities. Sanders wouldn't have done better.

-- Paul
answer:
Non-toxic


question:
Comment: As a long-time serious fan, I was uneasy when Helfrich was hired as coach because he did not project the depth and sophistication that coaching demanded; skills that were required also for top-level recruiting--it was like program overconfidence led to the peter principle, automatically going in-house from offensive coordinator to coach, but he was not on a par with Chip.  We were hopeful as he did very well with Chip's players and scheme, but it went downhill as they graduated and were not replaced with players of the same caliber, particularly at quarterback.  Defensive recruiting and coaching also suffered after Alioti left and was replaced in-house.  This year, inexperience and his bad play calling cost us games that we had to win, and losing created a downward spiral.  Helfrich is a wonderful person, but he just did not cut it as coach, on the field, staffing or recruiting, and it could be seen coming for more than a year. Now let's see who can jump in and right the ship.
answer:
Non-toxic


question:
Comment: "protect Colorado officers"
OK
I understand how it punishes idiots, but how does it protect people?
answer:

Toxic