We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

[EX Q]: Sent1: And that killer has help, he has the people that support the death penalty and will give him more appeals, and if found guilty he'll get an easy way out with death, he won't have to suffer.
 Sent2: Ask the family members of who he killed if he deserves death.
[EX A]: Not similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: , I believe the death penalty has deterred at least some people from committing murder.
 Sent2: Death penalty should be allowed as it deters people from committing serious crimes such as murder.
[EX A]: Similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: There is no way to determine how many murders would have been committed.
 Sent2: if someone commits any crime, then they are a criminal by definition and should die.
[EX A]:
Not similar