TASK DEFINITION: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: insult and non-insult. Insult is any lanugage or act that is disrespectful or scornfully abusive.
PROBLEM: Comment: Our silly and foolish PM sided with these goons, deflecting the blame on the the peaceful anti illegal migrant group, calling them "a racist small minority that will not define who we are". This kind of rhetoric simply encourages, emboldens and promotes the real danger to our democracy, namely the far-left extremists who want to stifle free speech and debate in this country. These are the people who prevent anyone who is not of their persuasion to speak in public, they attack any protesters who stand up for values opposed to theirs, call anyone who does not agree with them a racist, a bigot, a Nazi, etc. Our PM is responsible for the breakdown of peaceful and lawful discourse in this country. Hey Justin, democracy is not all about condoning actions of your supporters and calling everyone who opposes your view a racist! It's not prime ministerial.  You are no different from Trump in failing to condemn the true perpetrators.  The only difference is that you come from the socialist left.

SOLUTION: Insult

PROBLEM: Comment: As much as everyone here would like to believe that, his argument is there was no legal probable cause to justify the search warrant in the first place. To use an analogy, what if I were to go to the police and say, "I saw justmyview371 kill Allie, and hid her body in his spare bedroom." Would my outright lie be probable cause enough for a judge to issue a search warrant and, consequently, for the cops to force their way into your house and tear up your home?

Likewise, if the evidence against this guy was wrongfully procured, then any subsequent action resulting from that evidence would be invalid. The Protestants that founded this country built into the Constitution in order to protect our rights against actions that their former English government wrongfully used against their own people.

The prosecutors bungled this case. They should have known their video evidence was wrongfully procured (if that was indeed the case), then procured alternate evidence with which to prosecute.

SOLUTION: Non-insult

PROBLEM: Comment: Thanks for the help.  Blind attacks on Harper for military action vs blind support for Justins military action.  Yet no links to support your wild assertions.

How truly pathetic you are.

SOLUTION:
Insult