In this task, you are given a passage which has a question and the context. You have to generate an answer to the question based on the information present in the context.

Input: Consider Input: Context: Total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) results in superior clinical outcomes to hemiarthroplasty (HA); however, TSA is a more technical and invasive procedure. This study retrospectively compares perioperative complications after HA and TSA using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database.', 'The NSQIP user file was queried for HA and TSA cases from the years 2005 through 2010. Major complications were defined as life-threatening or debilitating. All complications occurred within 30 days of the initial procedure. We performed multivariate analysis to compare complication rates between the two procedures, controlling for patient comorbidities.', 'The database returned 1,718 patients (HA in 30.4% [n = 523] and TSA in 69.6% [n = 1,195]). The major complication rates in the HA group (5.2%, n = 29) and TSA group (5.1%, n = 61) were similar (P = .706). Rates of blood transfusions for postoperative bleeding in patients undergoing HA (2.3%, n = 12) and TSA (2.9%, n = 35) were indistinguishable (P = .458). Venous thromboembolism was a rare complication, occurring in 0.4% of patients in each group (2 HA patients and 5 TSA patients, P > .999). On multivariate analysis, the operative procedure was not associated with major complications (P = .349); however, emergency case, pulmonary comorbidity, anemia with a hematocrit level lower than 36%, and wound class of III or IV increased the risk of a major complication (P < .05 for all).\Question: Are perioperative complications after hemiarthroplasty and total shoulder arthroplasty equivalent?

Output: Multivariate analysis of patients undergoing TSA or HA in the NSQIP database suggests that patient factors-not the procedure being performed-are significant predictors of major complications. Controlling for patient comorbidities, we found no increased risk of perioperative major complications in patients undergoing TSA compared with HA.


Input: Consider Input: Context: Allergic asthma is characterized by inflammation and airway remodeling. Bronchial epithelium is considered a key player in coordinating airway wall remodeling. In mild asthma, the epithelium is damaged and fails to proliferate and to repair, whereas in severe asthma, the epithelium is highly proliferative and thicker. This may be due to different regulatory mechanisms. The purpose of our study was to determine the role of miRNAs in regulating proliferation of bronchial epithelial cells obtained from severe asthmatic subjects in comparison with cells obtained from mild asthmatics and healthy controls.', 'Human bronchial epithelial cells (BEC) were isolated by bronchoscopy from bronchial biopsies of healthy donors and patients with mild and severe asthma. MiRNA expression was evaluated using the TaqMan low-density arrays and qRT-PCR. Transfection studies of bronchial epithelial cells were performed to determine the target genes. Cell proliferation was evaluated by BrdU incorporation test.', 'MiR-19a was upregulated in epithelia of severe asthmatic subjects compared with cells from mild asthmatics and healthy controls. Functional studies based on luciferase reporter and Western blot assays suggest that miR-19a enhances cell proliferation of BEC in severe asthma through targeting TGF-β receptor 2 mRNA. Moreover, repressed expression of miR-19a increased SMAD3 phosphorylation through TGF-β receptor 2 signaling and abrogated BEC proliferation.\Question: Does microRNA-19a enhance proliferation of bronchial epithelial cells by targeting TGFβR2 gene in severe asthma?

Output: Our study uncovers a new regulatory pathway involving miR-19a that is critical to the severe phenotype of asthma and indicates that downregulating miR-19a expression could be explored as a potential new therapy to modulate epithelium repair in asthma.


Input: Consider Input: Context: Immunochemical therapy combining cytokines and chemotherapeutic agents is expected to be effective for treating advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC). We investigated the mechanism underlying the synergism of interferon-alpha (IFN-alpha) and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and the effect of p53 status on the synergy of the combined therapy in RCC cell lines.', 'The synergy of IFN-alpha and 5-FU was analyzed by isobolographic analysis in five RCC cell lines. The effect of combined treatment on apoptosis induction was measured by flow cytometric analysis, Hoechst staining, and caspase activity assay; PCNA expression was investigated by Western blotting to examine the effect of combined treatment on the antiproliferative effect.', 'We demonstrated synergy of IFN-alpha and 5-FU in five RCC cell lines with wild-type p53. IFN-alpha suppressed the proliferation of RCC cells via G1 or G2/M cell cycle arrest without inducing apoptosis, whereas 5-FU induced apoptosis in a dosage-dependent manner. IFN-alpha enhanced the apoptosis of RCC cells induced by 5-FU, whereas 5-FU did not increase the antiproliferative effect of IFN-alpha. However, the synergistic inhibition by IFN-alpha and 5-FU was abolished when the cell lines were transfected with p53 dominant-negative vector.\Question: Does synergy of interferon-alpha and 5-fluorouracil in human renal cell carcinoma require p53 activity?


Output: The synergy of IFN-alpha and 5-FU requires p53 activity, suggesting that p53 status may serve as a predictive factor for response to the combination therapy. Because metastatic RCC frequently has p53 mutations, therapy restoring p53 may markedly improve the response rate of immunochemical therapy combining IFN-alpha and 5-FU.