We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

[EX Q]: I know people who want to limit ownership of guns to musket-type weapons as were used when the 2nd amendment was written and people that are for an insane amount of registration and background checks, etc.
[EX A]: Valid

[EX Q]: Even though he says he's neither in the collective or individual column he is clearly in the collective column simply by suggesting that the right to bear arms requires you to be in the militia (which SCOTUS disagrees with.)
[EX A]: Valid

[EX Q]: all guns are used for is killing, they are weapons.
[EX A]:
Valid