We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

Example Input: Those who admit to being a firearms owner are unlikely to admit to binge drinking, and those who admit they engage in binge drinking are unlikely to admit to owning a firearm.
Example Output: Valid

Example Input: The first thing you need to do when someone is charged with a crime is understand what the charge is and what must be proved.
Example Output: Valid

Example Input: I'll freely admit that there is a larger jump between guns and nukes than knives and guns, but there is still a direct difference in lethality.
Example Output:
Valid