In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine the neutral choice based on your inference from the statement and your commonsense knowledge. The neutral choice is a sentence that neither agrees nor disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3', corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence. If sentence X agrees with sentence Y, one's correctness follows from the other one. If sentence X disagrees with sentence Y, they can not be correct at the same time.

Q: Statement: But Pol Pot is irredeemable. Choices: 1. Pol Pot can never be redeemed.  2. Pol pot is irredeemable because it is too old.  3. Pol Pot is redeemable. 

A: 2
****
Q: Statement: ( outlines how the Reform Party selects its presidential nominee.) Choices: 1. The Reform Party has only ever nominated white candidates. 2. There is no basis for how the Reform Party chooses its candidate, so they just support the Green candidate instead. 3. A nominee for president is selected by the Reform Party.

A: 1
****
Q: Statement: It was highly possible that it might prove to be Whittington. Choices: 1. There is no way that it could be Whittington. 2. There is a great chance it may turn out to be Whittington. 3. Whittington has a high probability of being the one because of his awkward disappearances of late.

A:
3
****