In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.
--------
Question: Comment: As if six or seven Trump articles over a two day period wasn't gratuitous enough, now an entire issue devoted to ICP/juggalos (the biohazard of White trash). Question : is WW being paid off, or is all this shilling for free?

Answer: Identity-attack


Question: Comment: "It doesn't keep elections 'pure' it just drives the money into STUPID AREAS"

Well, that's a useful bunch of gibberish. It's not like there aren't elections all around the world with campaign finance laws that work quite well.

"You want to get good candidates get rid of every restriction BUT the REPORTING requirements."

Here's a better idea: leave every candidate with limited but equal financing -- so that candidates focus solely on explaining why their policy is superior to all others -- and every citizen, whether billionaire or hobo has but one equal voice.

It's "one man one vote" not "one dollar one vote."

Answer: Non-identity-attack


Question: Comment: We have the most worthless Congress ever...the party that now finds itself in power had no idea they were going to win and no plan of what to do had they won. The establishment preordained this year to be a "battle" between Low Energy Jeb and Crooked Hillary with the latter taking the throne. The Republicans were expecting to be the opposition which is apparently all they're good at save Rand Paul and few others...totally worthless. Trump could make a deal with anyone until he met McConnell, Ryan, and McCann. The states who reelect these career hucksters deserve all of the ruin Obamacare brings them.

Answer:
Non-identity-attack