TASK DEFINITION: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
PROBLEM: Again Charlie, both you and EyesOnYourself are off base.

This news story IS ALL ABOUT OBESITY, and Angela's battle to overcome it.  To argue otherwise is silly.  Did you not read about how she got up to 340? That is considered to be Morbidly Obese, and usually results in a person becoming disabled at a young age, with a significantly reduced lifespan.

Angela's story is all about her struggle with obesity, and all I have done here is to try to further educate the public on its dangers. 

You, on the other hand Charlie, have contributed nothing at all to this discussion, other than to cast totally unfair attacks on me and my motivations for posting.   If you look back, you will see that I only talked about my own experience in order to defend myself from aspersions about my motives. 

I strongly resent your remarks, as they are of a most personal nature, and have nothing whatsoever to do with the topic of this news story.  Get off my back.

You are clearly an Internet bully.

SOLUTION: Yes

PROBLEM: Dividends have been less than a thousand in the past.  And the market is down from 2014 (after which the Senate became G.O.P. dominated and the economic recovery began plateauing).  Why would be "guarantee" a thousand?  This, of course, is the G.O.P. again showing their inability to remember recent history (like the oil crash of the 1980s) and a lack of smarts.

SOLUTION: No

PROBLEM: We also need to reduce the current members of the Alaska house and senate, to save the house and senate:  Vote anti-incumbent 2016, 2018, 2020...

SOLUTION:
No