In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence can be inferred from the statement. Incorrect choices change the meaning in important ways or have details that are not mentioned in the statement. Indicate your answer as 1,2, or 3 corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.

Ex Input:
Statement: While they have pushed hard for open skies policies in Japan and Europe and lobbied hard against government antitrust intervention, they have been more than happy to use the legislative process to protect what amount to sinecures. Choices:  1. These policies are popular among the public. 2. Japan and Europe did not use the legislative process. 3. Japan and Europe have pushed for open skies policies.

Ex Output:
3


Ex Input:
Statement: uh-huh yeah uh i have never seen her show but after hearing her sing the Star Spangled Banner anthem i will never watch her show Choices:  1. I have been a fan ever since I saw her on the show. 2. I will not watch the show after hearing her sing that song. 3. I just cannot stand her voice.

Ex Output:
2


Ex Input:
Statement: What's wrong with informing certain segments of the electorate that your opponent is using the feel-good rhetoric of solutions to pull a fast one at their expense? Choices:  1. One should never discuss one's opponent with the electorate. 2. There's nothing wrong with telling the voters about the opposing candidate's underhanded tactics. 3. The opponent is proposing highly illegal solutions in order to woo voters.

Ex Output:

2