instruction:
Given a document, an entity and its sentiment towards the entity, verify if it is the correct sentiment towards the entity. Answer should be yes or no. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].
question:
Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Smiths is Neutral . The Smiths disgust mounted when  after repeated demands  Toyota finally responded and appeared to suggest the owners of the vehicle were at fault.
"When we finally forced Toyota to respond in writing  we received a five- sentence analysis stating  and I quote  'When properly maintained  the brakes will always over-ride the accelerator.'
"Well  we know that's a lie  and we were outraged that Toyota would suggest in that statement also that the brakes have to not properly be maintained in order for that to happen and the car had less than 3 000 miles on it."
Smith said they took their complaint to the National Center for Dispute Settlement but described the proceedings as a "total farce."
The local field technician for Lexus participated in the hearing by speakerphone despite being based only an hour away  and testified that Smith had "caused this problem by standing on the brakes while spinning the tires."
"Well  of course  we were furious that Toyota called us liars a second time " Smith said.
Undeterred  the Smiths took their case to the federal National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA).
But although the agency sent investigators to probe the circumstances of the incident  the SmithsSmiths said neither NHTSA nor Toyota took their case seriously. Eventually  and reluctantly  they gave up their case in 2008.
answer:
no


question:
Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Hope Hicks is Positive . Updated at 7:08 p.m.  ET
White House communications director Hope Hicks  President Trump's longest-serving aide   is resigning and will depart in the next few weeks  the White House says.
In a White House that has set records for staff turnover (and it isn't even close)  the departure of  Hicks  still came as a shock.
Hicks  who has been working with the president for three years  managed to stay in his orbit even after many others had been pushed out. President Trump called  Hicks  "outstanding."
Earlier this month  Hicks  was deeply involved in the White House's botched handling of domestic abuse allegations against a former top aide to the president. But a White House official insists  Hicks ' decision to resign wasn't related to either of those matters.
Another person close to  Hicks  told NPR the resignation has been in the works for weeks.
"There are no words to adequately express my gratitude to President Trump "  Hicks  said in the statement. "I wish the President and his administration the very best as he continues to lead our country."
 Hicks  joined the Trump organization in 2014 — recruited by Ivanka Trump  who was impressed by work  Hicks  had done for her clothing line while working at a New York public relations firm.  Hicks  was then pulled into the Trump campaign before there even was a campaign  becoming de facto press secretary while initially she continued doing work for the Trump Organization.
answer:
no


question:
Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Michelle Obama is Positive . âIt doesnât even look like  her .â
That one comment  culled from thousands online about  Baltimore artist Amy Sheraldâs portrait of Michelle Obama  unveiled today at the Smithsonian Instituteâs National Portrait Gallery  sums up a familiar response to the publicâs often less-than flattering responses to portrait painting.
In  the portrait    Mrs. Obama  sits in a custom dress designed by Millyâs Michelle Smith of bold geometric shapes   her  expression challenging the viewer.  Her  face and skin are grey  as Sherald often paints  her  subjects.
It doesnât look exactly like  her   it doesnât look exactly not like  her . It is a representation of Mrs. Obama  who sat for Sherald the artist  and the responses to the result sum up the tension between artist and sitter and artist and spectator  too.
Holland Cotter  art critic for the New York Times  said  Mrs. Obama âs portrait face was too far removed from the real one.
This gets at the central tension of the art of the portrait. Just how much should a portrait be about physical likeness  versus conveying psychological truth  or an insight into character? The furor over  Michelle Obamaâs  portrait suggests we want a portrait to deliver the first above all else.
What peopleâs kvetching comes down to: this painting isnât enough like a photograph. The spirit that  Mrs. Obama  represented to so many seems lacking in the more restrained  removed spirit of Sheraldâs work. But the public face of  Michelle Obama  isn't the only face. Sherald is arguably trying to show us another face.
In this sense  Kehinde Wileyâs accompanying portrait of  Barack Obama  is seen as more successful. It looks more like the photographic  Barack Obama  we know. Here  any outrage voiced seems to have been about the background  which features flowers from three significant places to  him : Kenya  Hawaii and Chicago.
"I tried to negotiate less gray hair and Kehinde's artistic integrity would not allow ( him ) to do what I asked "  Obama  said. "I tried to negotiate smaller ears. Struck out on that as well."
Both painters aimed to do something beyond simple replication for their portraits. The backdrop of a bush  or garden  endows  Barack Obama  with a literal life force. The garden is green and vibrant behind  him . The setting is entirely complimentary to  his  persona; in the painting  he  is sitting forward  alert.  He  is fixing us with a wizened glare. This garden is pure Obama Zen.
 Mrs. Obama âs portrait is starker  and psychologically richer. "Amy  I want to thank you for so spectacularly capturing the grace and beauty and intelligence and charm and hotness of the woman I love " Mr. Obama said.
 Mrs. Obama  said  she  hoped "girls and girls of color" would âsee an image of someone who looks like them hanging on the walls of this great American institution ... And I know the kind of impact that will have on their lives because I was one of those girls.â
In  her  remarks   Mrs. Obama  acknowledges what  her  portraitâs detractors do not; that a painting such as this is a distillation rather than impersonation. It is the personâs spirit in the moment of sitting  rather than a literal embodiment of that person.
If you really feel that Michelle Obamaâs portrait is a dud  the queen got it far worse in George Condoâs portrait of her  envisioning her with a huge neck and bulbous cheeks and chin. A Cabbage Patch Doll  scoffed the critics.
You may not think  Michelle Obama  looks much like  herself  in this new portrait   she  may not be the public  Michelle Obama  you have seen and responded to  but at least  she  doesnât look like someone or something else entirely.
answer:

yes