Given a paragraph about cooking, and a set of conversational questions and answers about the paragraph, say whether the passage contains sufficient information to answer the follow-up question. Say Yes if it is answerable; otherwise, say No. The paragraph has the prefix 'CONTEXT:'. Each conversation question has a prefix `Q:` followed by the answer prefix `A:`, and the follow-up question has a prefix `FOLLOWUP_Q:`.

Ex Input:
CONTEXT: I understand that sugar (and by extension jaggery) helps yeast multiply at a very fast paceThis is only partly true. Yeast is a living organism and can only live under certain conditions, including a certain osmotic pressure. If you start from pure bread dough, then adding a bit of sugar to the dough (or to the preferment) can make it rise faster. But adding sugar in quantities sufficient to make the bread taste sweet will slow down the yeast growth, as opposed to making it quicker. There is even an upper limit for how much sugar you can add per 100 g of flour, and it's not recommended to use recipes which prescribe more, as they turn out poorly. So I wouldn't change the amount of yeast, unless you make the empirical observation that your yeast is overfed (recognizable by speed of raising and the changed smell).  <sep>  Q: Sugar and yeast proportion while making sweet bread A: If you start from pure bread dough, then adding a bit of sugar to the dough (or to the preferment) can make it rise faster  Q: Should I decrease the amount of yeast used? A: There is even an upper limit for how much sugar you can add per 100 g of flour, and it's not recommended to use recipes which prescribe more  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: s there a rule or ratio by which I must decrease the yeast for every unit of sugar added?

Ex Output:
Yes


Ex Input:
CONTEXT: Probably not. Cans are generally marked at point of filling, not at point of manufacturingThe plastic liner looks plastic'y in all cases, it's very hard to tell. Epoxy is harder than other plastics, but there are epoxies that are BPA free anywayAluminium cans are more likely have a epoxy liner that will give off a trace of BPAMany steel cans do not use epoxy or other BPA plasticsHaving said that the tested BPA release from a can is 100's of times lower than the recommended maximum daily dose. So in theory there is nothing to really worry aboutThe common sense answer is, if epoxy dissolved into the cans contents they wouldn't use it would they. The whole reason it's there is to stop the contents 'eating' the can  <sep>  Q: Is there a definitive way to know if a tin can is lined with BPA? A: Probably not. Cans are generally marked at point of filling, not at point of manufacturing  Q: Is there any sign of BPA just from looking at the inside of the can? A: The plastic liner looks plastic'y in all cases, it's very hard to tel  Q: Why is BPA even used in cans? A: The whole reason it's there is to stop the contents 'eating' the can  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Are there cans that don't have BPA?

Ex Output:
No


Ex Input:
CONTEXT: Ribs should not be cooked with direct heat, generally. The directions on the meat are VERY defective. You should turn the left burner on, and put the ribs in the right side of the grill. You should cook at a temperature between 250-300F, typically for 4-5 hours. They're done when the meat pulls back from the bone and when you can easily tear the meat between bones, not when they hit a certain temperature. Check out amazingribs.com, and also get your money back. The instructions on the packaging border on fraud.  <sep>  Q: Ribs burned to a crisp following directions. What does "medium high" mean? A: Ribs should not be cooked with direct heat, generally. The directions on the meat are VERY defective  Q: If meat should not be cooked with direct heat, what is the most effective way? A: You should turn the left burner on, and put the ribs in the right side of the grill  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: So indirect heating would be the right way to go for cooking ribs?

Ex Output:

Yes