In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Example Input: Comment: You hit the nail on the head.   What Kurgan and devotees call "humor" is in fact sarcasm and ridicule.
Example Output: Non-obscene

Example Input: Comment: Ok you're calling me an idiot then? Then I have the right to say fuck you. You Hitler supporting, Thatcher tit sucking motherfucker.
Example Output: Obscene

Example Input: Comment: It is not just "fuck" but "dick" and "scumbags" -  all in the first three paragraphs at which point I gave up reading any further. The journalistic standards of most of the Daily Maverick regular contributors are something that make reading DM a pleasure each morning. As a doctor, I would be interested to hear a psychologist's opinion of why Richard Poplak appears to be compelled to include gratuitous adolescent obscenities in his articles.
Example Output:
Obscene