In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

[Q]: Comment: The sad sad part of this story not mentioned is that so many people believe Trump's complete lie that Obama and liberal polices are killing coal. It is such a downright complete lie, it is 100% market forces, clean cheap natural gas made available by fracking that is killing coal and no amount of lies by trump can change this. Every single CEO of any energy company will and do tell you this. Trump lies and the ignorant sad people in the rural suburban part of this country believe his lies.  I have never been so saddened by how ignorant a large majority of this Country has become.
[A]: Non-obscene


[Q]: Comment: "It does seem a little hypocritical for Dogwood to be complaining about Kinder Morgan playing a role in the B.C. election through its donations to the BC Liberals, when it is receiving money from the United States to fight for causes aligned with interests there. "
In one case, foreign interests donate money to advocacy groups.
In the other, foreign interests donate money to a political party whose members currently form the provincial government. 
Not even remotely equivalent, Gary, and tf. hardly hypocritical of Dogwood to complain about it.
[A]: Non-obscene


[Q]: Comment: Or a trad Catholic in disguise as a feminist.
[A]:
Non-obscene