We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Q: Granted, someone, who bestows great harm onto a family for egregious acts, doesn't give the government the right to kill that person.

A: Valid
****
Q: That is in no way right they have stripped that child of the human rights and dignity so they should have theirs taken away too.

A: Invalid
****
Q: Bloodsworth also became the first person to be exonerated from death row through postconviction DNA testing.

A:
Valid
****