We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

[EX Q]: So it seems that in the case of DC the justification for protecting the right to bear arms is lacking.
[EX A]: Valid

[EX Q]: Please respond to your opponents comments that you have taken "the right to keep and bear arms" statement and used it without the context specifically "the well regulated militia".
[EX A]: Valid

[EX Q]: They are going to lose and be shipped back to India or Canada where they are more comfortable working with and for the government :)
[EX A]:
Invalid