In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

Input: Consider Input: Comment: Such is the ways in which we have decided as a society as to how we we deal with misfits; those who march to the beat of another drum; those we can "put away" for not following the "norms" that have been established; those who are annoyingly bothersome; those who can't follow the rules; those with some find of deficiencies deemed difficult to handle, etc.  Do we consider these means to be the most effective and successful ways in dealing with these "problems"?  Sure doesn't seem like it, but, we seem to go on our merry way heading in this direction.  How come?

Output: Non-identity-attack


Input: Consider Input: Comment: Frightened Whites are easily manipulated by fear...especially those who can't seem to understand two simple sentences.

Output: Identity-attack


Input: Consider Input: Comment: "practice homosexuality, present deep-seated homosexual tendencies or support the so-called 'gay culture"

Since priests are celibate, anyone who "practices homosexuality" would be automatically prohibited from Holy Orders.  Why is this even an issue?


Output: Identity-attack