Given a paragraph about cooking, and a set of conversational question answers about the paragraph, answer a follow-up question from the paragraph. The paragraph has a prefix 'CONTEXT:'. Each conversation question has a prefix 'Q:' followed by answer prefix 'A:'. The final followup question has a prefix 'FOLLOWUP_Q:'.

Input: Consider Input: CONTEXT: Watt specifies the power of the device.Power is defined as energy per unit time. So watt is how quickly your device consumes energy.If it is an efficient device it will convert more of consumed electricity into heat. So given two equally efficient devices the higher watt one will produce more heat faster and can therefore cook faster than the less watt one.And the third part of your question has already been answered above. Yes, higher watt device will consume more electric power.  <sep>  Q: What role does a watt play in an induction stove? A: Watt specifies the power of the device  Q: Do you know if the watt power affects the cooking method? A: watt is how quickly your device consumes energy  Q: Do you know if an electricity consumption of higher watt induction stove higher? A: given two equally efficient devices the higher watt one will produce more heat faster and can therefore cook faster than the less watt one  Q: I see. So, you are suggesting that the higher the watt, the higher the cooking power? A: the higher watt one will produce more heat faster and can therefore cook faster  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: So, if I do want to cook food in a rush, then definitely a higher watt induction stove is the one that I require, correct?

Output: higher watt one will produce more heat faster and can therefore cook faster


Input: Consider Input: CONTEXT: I don't think so. In the mayonnaise case, all that has happened is the fat has come out of emulsion and gathered together again, so you can re-emulsify it. In the whipped cream case, you've started to create large fat crystals (butter). I guess technically it might work to heat it up to melt the butter, re-emulsify it into cream and then beat it again, but I don't think it would be worth the effort. You could go ahead and finish churning it into butter and buttermilk if you want to avoid wasting the cream.  <sep>  Q: Can ruined whipped cream be rescued? A: but I don't think it would be worth the effort  Q: Whatâs the process? A: heat it up to melt the butter, re-emulsify it into cream and then beat it again  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Can it be Re emulsified?###Or am I better off starting a fresh batch?

Output: re-emulsify it into cream and then beat it again, but I don't think it would be worth the effort


Input: Consider Input: CONTEXT: First, remove some, but not all, of the end. Make sure to leave a little of the root intact, as this will make the next steps easier. Peel the onion and discard the peel.Stand your onion on one of the now-flat ends. Chop in half with your chef's knife.Lay a single half on the flat end. Working from root to cut end, make several cuts at dice width that cut almost to the root end, but leave a little bit still attached.Working perpendicular to your last set of cuts, make another set of cuts at dice width. This will leave you with cut pieces. When you get to the portion with the root, discard it.Repeat for your other onion half.During cooking, the layers should flake apart leaving dice sized pieces.  <sep>  Q: A definitive method of dicing an onion A: Lay a single half on the flat end. Working from root to cut end, make several cuts at dice width that cut almost to the root end, but leave a little bit still attached  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Any unusual and clever methods you know of?


Output: Working perpendicular to your last set of cuts, make another set of cuts at dice width. This will leave you with cut pieces. When you get to the portion with the root, discard it