The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.

[EX Q]: Context: 'Hi there! Well first I was wondering what item you think you'd like or need the most?' 'I like firewood and water most' 'Hmm okay, I am willing to give you three waters! I was hoping to get 3 firewood though, as it's going to be really cold where I am going.'
Utterance: 'seems like we have same priority items. firewood. I also need firewood most because I am prone to pneumonia '
[EX A]: No

[EX Q]: Context: 'Okay I am willing to take your offer as I think you need the firewood more than me and I could use the extra water for hygiene related issues.' 'Thank you! I am grateful! ' 'You are very welcome!'
Utterance: 'I'm looking forward to this camping trip now knowing that we will have enough firewood to last🙂'
[EX A]: No

[EX Q]: Context: 'Yes! Did you bring any food to start?' 'I did, but my friend only feels comfortable with extra around, God forbid, if something happens this could save his life. So I'm thinking, I take all three food packages, two firewood packages and leave all three water and one firewood for you. ' 'I think that it is fair that you get three food and I get three water, but why should you get two firewood to my one?'
Utterance: 'The food is not for me, I'm not allowed to touch it. t\The only real benefit I'm getting here is firewood. ☹️'
[EX A]:
Yes