The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the self-need strategy, otherwise output No. self-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to create a personal need for an item in the negotiation, such as by pointing out that the participant sweats a lot to show preference towards water packages.
--------
Question: Context: 'i hope we can come to a compromise 🙂, what is another priority of yours besides the wood?' 'Food is a second priority for me, as I will be metal-detecting as well, & cannot risk fainting from the heat. How about I give you two firewood (I don't think we can "share", haha), you can give me two food packages, and two water packages.' 'okay, I am willing to give up more food to get the firewood, I like your offer🙂'
Utterance: 'I do as well. I'm glad we could come to an agreement! 🙂'

Answer: No


Question: Context: 'I know this isn't your problem, but I'm a student and I had to come up here to take photos of the night sky for my astronomy class. I slept really late today as I have to sit up all night to get the different stars, and possibly even the space station if it's clear enough out. I have to sit by a fire to stay warm so I can get these pictures to hand in to my professor tomorrow.' 'You know that is very impressive.  I admire your determination and effort you put into your class.  You must be very passionate about astronomy.' 'I am. My favorite personality is Neil DeGrasse Tyson. He's amazing, funny and incredibly smart. I'm hoping to get an internship at the Planetarium in my senior year 🙂'
Utterance: 'That's amazing!!!  So here is the deal...I'll give you the 2 firewood packages so you can sleep under the stars tonight.  In return I'll have to keep 2 water packages and 2 food packages since I won't be able to cook all of this fish and I still have a family to feed.  '

Answer: Yes


Question: Context: 'The most important is water because I have kidney problem so i need some more water.Without water I can't live.' 'I understand that completely. Would you be willing to take 2 waters, and I take 1 water? I still do need some water for my family. I can't have anyone getting heat stroke. But you can have more.' 'Okay.But I need whole water to survive.'
Utterance: 'Of course. So, what about food? I will definitely need the food. I have a big family, and we all need to eat. I can't have people starving. Can I take all of the food?'

Answer:
Yes