The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the no-need strategy, otherwise output No. no-need is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used when a participant points out that they do not need an item based on personal context such as suggesting that they have ample water to spare. no-need can directly benefit the opponent since it implies that the item is up for grabs.

Context: 'Ahh I need water and food... I'd be willing to give you all 3 firewood and 1 water for 2 water and 3 food. What do you think about that?' 'deal' 'Awesome! 🙂 What else will you do on your trip?'
Utterance: 'i hunt hehe'
No

Context: 
Utterance: 'Hello! I'm packing for my camping adventure.'
No

Context: 'Oh I see, its going to be THAT kind of negotiation 🙂  Let's just look at it this way.. I'm with a couple other Floridians so we're not really too worried about firewood as we prefer it cooler, anyway.. and we know the lake is nearby that's stocked with trout for eating if necessary (and of course some fresh water's there, too) - so.. I can tell you that I could go totally without Firewood if I needed to.. I'd rather not, but I could.' 'Do you prefer food or water more?' 'Since the lake is nearby enough, I think we'd be more interested in ensuring there's enough food for my people, I think 🙂'
Utterance: 'Hmm. I really need food too. I don't care much for water either. How about I take all 3 firewood, 2 food, and 1 water?'

Yes