Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.

[EX Q]: RR: Crime of passion? You think this was about passion? Did you read his statement? She had asked him to put gun away cause he was drinking and come to bed. He then pointed the gun and pulled the trigger. Crime of passion denotes reason, he had none.
[EX A]: No

[EX Q]: The best part of the ACA is that patients could not be denied for existing conditions.  Previously, those patients with seriously expensive conditions were mostly paid through medicare and medicaid paid by the State and the Feds.  Under ACA the really expensive patients got their insurance.  The only difference is that the entire cost of their coverage is born by other ACA rate payers.  23,000 people, roughly 10% of insured people statewide, are paying the entire costs of our most expensive patients.  This is a good bill and should be a priority.
[EX A]: No

[EX Q]: I guess I am just so proud of our congressional delegation…Three elected officials dan muk cow sky, liza sullivan and  ding young. They haven’t held back helping any corporation in need, supporting the fossil fuel industry, full speed ahead with tax cuts for the wealthy, and corporations. Never a  consideration for human rights, workers’ rights, public safety or even the environment. Maximum profit and no accountability just like their bosses the koch brothers preach,  and for them to come together unanimously  in support of trump, well it’s just another great moment in amerikan history.
[EX A]:
No