We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gay Marriage) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gay marriage. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gay marriage.

If this were a case of the government raising money to change religion, or opposing religion under the system's rules, you might have a point.
Invalid

To bad for you, gay "rights" aren't covered under the constitution...which is probably why you support the "evolving" constitution where you have 5 outta 9 people decide what the consitution should say.
Valid

Certainly the arguments of freedom and equality apply as equally to same-sex marriage as they do to incestuous marriage, but foundation of the debate is the harms incestuous marriage creates.

Valid