We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

[Q]: Statistics show that capital punishment is no more of a deterrent than life without parole so I fail to see your arguement about society needing capital punishment.
[A]: Valid


[Q]: For example: Does anyone think that Bin Laden was innocent in the 9/11 World Trade Center bombings?
[A]: Invalid


[Q]: By skimming my first link it seems like more states without a death penalty statute have less murders then others.
[A]:
Valid