instruction:
In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.
question:
Comment: I was so excited to eat at Mi Mero Mole until I found out that the owner, Nick Zukin, was racist and so dismissive of Black Lives Matter.

I'm grateful that this very real issue with Saffron has brought much more about Portland businesses into the light and caused folks to dig deeper into who they support.

Smart business owners should do the right thing and use this opportunity to sympathize with the community (who is rightfully outraged) with the result of likely earning that community's support and winning  them over to their business (much like Ristretto Roasters did) rather than PUBLICLY expressing support and shooting themselves in the proverbial foot. It doesn't look like Nick Zukin is that kind of business owner. I suppose some people just like to commit business-suicide.

It's amazing how arrogant business owners like Sally and Nick are to think that Portland has enough racists or racist-sympathizers to keep their restaurants afloat.
answer:
Non-sexual-explicit


question:
Comment: Um, Bill Clinton paid Paula Jones almost a million dollars in a sexual harassment lawsuit. There are 18 other women- including Juanita Broaddrick who says Clinton raped her- who are sexual assault victims of Bill Clinton
answer:
Sexual-explicit


question:
Comment: This Muslim says "WTG El-Papa."  Wholeheartedly agree.  Heard her speak one time in which she said, "You girls, please don't kill your babies--give them to me."  Wept until my beard was met because it was clear to me and everyone present that she meant every word she said.  I won't pray to her, as I only pray to God, but I certainly have no problem revering her as a saint.  A MUCH better choice than some of the Church's earlier picks.
answer:

Non-sexual-explicit