In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

Ex Input:
Sentence: Bob paid for Charlie's college education, but now Charlie acts as though it never happened. He is very ungrateful.
 Reason: The 'He' refers to charlie because CHARLIE REFER TO BOB. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

Ex Output:
Wrong


Ex Input:
Sentence: Sara borrowed the book from the library because she needs it for an article she is working on. She reads it when she gets home from work.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the book because The book is referred to as the pronoun here a word that can function by itself as a noun phrase and that refers either to the participants in the discourse. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

Ex Output:
Wrong


Ex Input:
Sentence: The actress used to be named Terpsichore, but she changed it to Tina a  few years ago, because she figured it was too hard to pronounce.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to terpsichore because it is likely to refer to tina because tina is more easier to pronounce than terpsichore. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

Ex Output:

Correct