TASK DEFINITION: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.
PROBLEM: Comment: Yes, your analysis is crap. Your first statement is apples and oranges. The Canadian soldiers don't have to sue to get their benefits (although Harper was headed that way). You haven't read the case so you have no clue what it was actually about. Finally, the "lefties" applaud getting the damn thing over with at a lower cost. Your problem was with the 3 previous governments, this part of things was inevitable. Harper (he did love losing at the Supeme Court)would likely have been stupid enough to fight it and triple the cost.

SOLUTION: Obscene

PROBLEM: Comment: FUCK CU

SOLUTION: Obscene

PROBLEM: Comment: >Yes, there are violent extremists on the right. Nobody denies that. The original alt-right was indeed bigoted. But tarring an entire movement with the same brush is simplistic, myopic, and intellectually cowardly.
Not if it's true. If you are prepared to stand with Nazis, to march with Nazis, or to even belong to a group that welcomes Nazis then you ARE a Nazi. The Nazis could only achieve what they did at their worst because so many people were willing to overlook the worst of it for the bits they liked.

Forget dismissing them - that is not a concern. They should be feared. They should provoke violent resistance. And every fellow traveler along with them. There is no moral difference between operating the gas chamber, and looking the other way because the operator got you a cushy job, or happens to be marching for the same statue you are.

Of course you can, occasionally, ally with people on one issue while opposing them on others. But NOT when those people are bloody Nazis ! Crazy.

SOLUTION:
Obscene