We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

[Q]: For Madison, a bill of rights provided a second chance for his pet project: to obtain the congressional veto of state laws that he had tried, but failed, to achieve at the 1787 Convention.
[A]: Invalid


[Q]: If individual citizens should not, in your view, be permitted to own firearms, them make your case and let the amendment process work to make your view the law of the land.
[A]: Valid


[Q]: Victoria, a state in Aussie land of antipodeans, garnished an increase of violent crime of 400% the first year of the gun ban.
[A]:
Valid