In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Ex Input:
Comment: You triggered a memory of a Washington Post magazine article of a man in suburban WDC who had his whole house wired to hear Rush Limbaugh in every room around the clock.  And he was "a devout Catholic!"
You'd think if he was "a devout Catholic" he might have the house wired to hear the gospel in every room around the clock.   But, no!
He got more of a rush from Limbaugh than the gospel, eh?

Ex Output:
Non-obscene


Ex Input:
Comment: If you feel that the gains in gender equality (If they were gains and not just part of the culture before the revolution) negates the starvation, lack of basic luxuries freely obtainable in the west, loss of freedom and the reintroduction of slavery - the gulags were labour camps after all where people not only worked without wages in the worst conditions in the frozen tundra without adequate sustenance- then perhaps you should re-examine your priorities.  How many Soviet leaders were female?

Ex Output:
Non-obscene


Ex Input:
Comment: I guess this is why Wyoming loses population every year. It's a ****hole.

Ex Output:

Obscene