We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Example Input: Sent1: ...Virtually never are murderers the ordinary, law-abiding people against whom gun bans are aimed.
 Sent2: Cars kill people everyday just the same as guns, but nobody is trying to ban cars.
Example Output: Not similar

Example Input: Sent1: Rather, if firearms availability does matter, the data consistently show that the way it matters is that more guns equal less violent crime.
 Sent2: The opposite of "more guns = less crime is not true" is not "more guns = more crime".
Example Output: Not similar

Example Input: Sent1: I implied that there are people with guns that are nuts, not that all gun owners are nuts...
 Sent2: It amasses me how many anti-gun nut activists have armed guards.
Example Output:
Not similar