instruction:
Given a document and an entity the task is to select the author's sentiment towards the entity. Sentiments can be Positive, Neutral and Negative. Select Positive if the article expresses a positive view towards the given entity or praises its quality or skills. Select Neutral if the document expresses no clear view towards the entity or has equal amounts of positive and negative statements or expressing some fact/quote by someone else. Select Negative if the article expresses a negative view towards like harsh remarks, criticizing entities action/decision etc. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].
question:
What is the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Thomas Edison ? A long-lost piece of electrical wire from  Thomas Edison’s  first underground cable for electric lighting is up for sale.
 Edison’s  own home in Menlo Park  a section of  Edison   New Jersey  was among the homes lit in the November 1880 electrical lighting test.
“Because of this test  Edison  was able to put lights up in New York; because of that   it  went worldwide ” he added.
The wire was saved by F.A. Wardlaw  a long-time  Edison  lab aide who was present on the night of the test. In 1933  Wardlaw dug up the wire and sent it to Paul Kruesi  the son of  Edison ’s chief machinist  who grew up with the inventor in Menlo Park. A handwritten note from Wardlaw is attached to the piece of electrical wire.
“Perhaps you would like a piece of the original conductor used by  Edison  at Menlo Park at the now historic demonstra­tion of the Edison System of Incandescent Electric Lighting in 1880  so am sending you one ” Wardlaw wrote in a Oct. 4  1933 letter accompanying the artifact and note. “I dug it out of the bank on the east side of Christie St  Menlo Park  directly opposite your old home  last Friday. It was the first underground cable ever used for electric lighting and appears pretty good yet after being buried for 53 years.”
answer:
Positive


question:
What is the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Richard Spencer ? (CNN) Protesters greeted  white supremacist leader Richard Spencer  with loud boos and chants of "Go home Spencer" during  his  speech Thursday afternoon at the University of Florida in Gainesville.
The talk was Spencer's first planned speech on a college campus since  he  and others participated in the " Unite the Right " rally in Charlottesville  Virginia  in August.
 Spencer  took the stage at the Phillips Center at just after 2:45 p.m. Those in the venue  many of whom stood with their fists raised  loudly booed and chanted lines like "Go home  Spencer " and "Nazis are not welcome here."
"I'm not going home  I will stand here all day if I have to " a combative  Spencer  told the crowd.
People react as  Richard Spencer  speaks at the Phillips Center on Thursday in Gainesville  Florida.
Still  the heckling continued through  his  time on stage  leading to several moments of frustration from  Spencer .
The event thrust the university into the ongoing debate about what constitutes protected speech and the extent of its limits.  Spencer  is the president of the National Policy Institute  a leader of the "alt-right" movement and a proponent of the white nationalist movement that advocates for a white "awakening" and a white ethno-state.
Protesters held up signs against  Richard Spencer  in Gainesville.
University of Florida President W. Kent Fuchs denounced  Spencer 's white supremacist platform as abhorrent in a letter to students  but said the school could not stop him from renting the Phillips Center for the event.
Crowds gather outside  Richard Spencer's  speech at the Phillips Center at the University of Florida.
The vast majority of people out protesting were opposed to  Spencer  and  his  views. Craig Carlisle  from Gainesville  held up a sign saying "No Trump Nazis." He said he had a message for  Spencer : "Don't be racist."
Jamie Bell was one of many people protesting  Richard Spencer 's speech in Gainesville.
A man wearing a shirt with swastikas on it was punched by an unidentified person near the site of  a planned speech by Richard Spencer .
 White nationalist Richard Spencer  faced a vocal outcry at  his speech on Thursday .
In an interview with CNN on Tuesday   Spencer  said  he  was flattered by the state of emergency declaration  which  he  said put  him  on par with "hurricanes and invading armies and zombie apocalypses."
Still   he  said  he  thought the declaration was overkill.
answer:
Neutral


question:
What is the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Milo Yiannopoulos ? Only a year ago  CPAC found itself in controversy for having scheduled as a keynote speaker Milo Yiannopoulos  the potty-mouthed homosexual enfant terrible.
When old video revealed that  Milo  had once been frighteningly blasÃ© about sex with teenage boys  CPAC made a dramatic show of disavowing Milo.
Many fellow travelers came forward to defend  Milo . We viewed child molestation as detestable  but we consistently condemned it  even if this meant denouncing homosexual subculture.  Milo 's survival of childhood sex abuse explained much of  his  aberrant and disorderly behavior.
Why did so many conservatives goad  Milo  on for years  then turn on  him  once  his  past abuse cast a pall on  his  public witness? For the type of conservatives who flock to CPAC â think-tank parvenus  Ann Coulter fans  Fox News oracles  College Republicans  emulators of Laura Ingraham and Steven Crowder â conservatism mixes rebellion  wit  professionalism  and prestige. They sense that pointy-headed political correctness and taxes are bad  while anti-liberal snark and a rising Dow Jones are good. They delight in mocking liberals who embarrass themselves and relish the indignant outrage they feel when gazing on liberalism at its worst: transgender bathrooms  campus madness  Harvey Weinstein hypocrisy  or historical illiteracy. Such mainstream  young  and urbane conservatives do not necessarily like being told to show restraint  self-critique  and repentance.
The influence of libertarians in the CPAC universe explains what happened with  Milo  and provides some context for the banishment of Mass Resistance.  Milo  provided too much fun for anyone to slow  him  down until the seriousness of  his  past with sexual abuse made "conservatives" reconsider their allegiance to  him .
When  Milo  was de-platformed  I thought  he  was the canary in the coal mine. Maybe not. By trying to get a seat at CPAC's table  Mass Resistance tested the viability of the Burkean-colorful-libertarian alliance. I lead Mass Resistance's Texas chapter. I know that our partisans defend their beliefs with dogged sincerity. I also know that libertarians find us embarrassingly old-fashioned and Burkean mainstream conservatives fear we will not play well in Georgetown.
answer:

Neutral