The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the vouch-fair strategy, otherwise output No. vouch-fair is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to call out fairness for personal benefit, either when acknowledging a fair deal or when the opponent offers a deal that benefits them. This can be through an explicit call out or can be implied.

Q: Context: 'can't do that, I would need 2 water, 2 food don't need firewood.' 'No one wants firewood!  Guess no s’mores!' 'It's bad for the environment'
Utterance: 'How about I take 1 water, 2 food and 3 firewood'

A: No
****
Q: Context: 'Okay, maybe wwe can split the food and water somehow. I don't know how.🙂' 'Can i have 2 firewood, 2 food and 1 water' 'That can work. That seems like a good solution to the problem.🙂'
Utterance: 'Ok I hope you are okay with that. Please confirm!'

A: No
****
Q: Context: 'Hi, I am great 🙂 How are you? I would be happy for you to have two waters if I can have one. I would also like to have three things of food. I love cooking outside, so I would love to make large delicious meals for my group to enjoy' 'That sounds amazing and delicious! maybe we can compromise? Maybe, I can get all 3 waters and you can have all 3 Foods? what do you think? ' ' I would agree to that if I can also have two things of firewood. I am going to need a lot of wood, so I can cook the meals I am making 🙂'
Utterance: 'I completely understand, thank you for compromising with water and food. Wished we had 4 firewoods to divide and share it equaly, may I ask how long will you be camping for? Im afraid I need 2 firewoods as well, maybe we can see who has the greater need? '

A:
Yes
****