instruction:
The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the small-talk strategy, otherwise output No. small-talk is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used for discussing topics apart from the negotiation, in an attempt to build a rapport with the opponent. For example, discussing how the opponent is doing during the pandemic or sharing excitement for the camping trip.
question:
Context: 'Hi, I'd like 3 packages of food. I have diabetes and my blood sugar could drop.'
Utterance: 'oh dear, I am sorry to hear that my son is type one, I am okay with giving you all the food if you could give me all the firewood. I have hypothyroidism and it makes me get cold.'
answer:
No


question:
Context: 'I really need 2 foods. I can do with 1 water or if you are in a giving mood then maybe I can have 2 waters? 🙂' 'Looks like we both really need the food.  If you get 2 food I would need 1 food, 2 water and 3 firewood. ' 'Since you will get all the fire would do you think I could have 2 foods and 2 waters. You would get 1 food, 1 water, and 3 firewood. 🙂 You seem like you are a great outdoor person that I would think you would be able to catch some fish to cook with the firewood. 🙂'
Utterance: 'No that does work well for me.  If I only have 1 food I need 2 waters and the firewood to make up for the loss of food.'
answer:
No


question:
Context: 'I would really like some extra firewood to keep the chill off on those cold  nights.🙂' 'Me too. It has been rather cold lately! But I am also really interested in water.' 'I don't need the water as much.  How about I get 2 firewood and you get 2 water?'
Utterance: 'I would prefer all the water. You can have all of the firewood.'
answer:

No