We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

[EX Q]: Sent1: In short, the panel could find no link between restrictions on gun ownership and lower rates of crime, firearms violence or even accidents with guns.
 Sent2: Those who would remove our freedom to defend ourselves always seem to link the number of guns to the high rate of gun crime.
[EX A]: Not similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: If gun bans worked there would be no gun deaths in the countries that have banned guns.
 Sent2: Do not ban guns when guns are the tools of man.
[EX A]: Not similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: What it seems like you are claiming is that if the owner would otherwise let you in if you didn't have a gun, you have a right to go in by the 2nd amendment.
 Sent2: Perhaps you should show how registration is an infringement on 2nd amendment rights.
[EX A]:
Not similar