In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.

Ex Input:
Comment: Your story is my story (insert married elementary school principal).  The economic carnage was the same.

Never again.

Ex Output:
Agree


Ex Input:
Comment: And what do you think about Trudeau's approval of pipelines?  Such hypocrisy from the right wing.  Canadians are sick to death of it.  Grow up.

Trudeau is simply reiterating the statements made by none other than Stephen Harper.

Ex Output:
Disagree


Ex Input:
Comment: Do you realize that, regardless of your point of view, Gov. Walker actually DID something?  The Legislature has only itself to blame ... and I choose to blame it, and not the governor, whose hand was forced by legislators who could have / should have produced "something" in this session and the first "overtime."  

Furthermore, he did something that was not politically self-serving.  He may incur the wrath of voters for this and either be recalled (silly) or not re-elected.  He knows that, and is willing to stand up for what he believes is a solution (or a step in that direction).  How many of our legislators are willing to put principle over re-election?

I don't have to like the governor's solution to admire him for not doing what is politically expedient, but, rather, to put his reputation on the line for something he believes in.

Ex Output:

Agree