We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

[Q]: Sent1: I assume in what follows that we, the country or the state, execute only for the crime of murder, though many capital punishment adherents would use it for other crimes, such as child rape, treason, arson, robbery and even fraud.
 Sent2: That should be a crime which should result in the death penalty.
[A]: Not similar


[Q]: Sent1: The death penalty is the only just punishment for their actions.
 Sent2: The Death penalty does not work because the kind of people that murder will not stop and think of the consequences before their actions.
[A]: Not similar


[Q]: Sent1: If these are indeed comparable, I wouldn't argue for the death penalty even in murder.
 Sent2: I'm pro-death penalty because there is no atonement for murder.
[A]:
Similar