The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the small-talk strategy, otherwise output No. small-talk is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used for discussing topics apart from the negotiation, in an attempt to build a rapport with the opponent. For example, discussing how the opponent is doing during the pandemic or sharing excitement for the camping trip.

[EX Q]: Context: 'I see. I do need at least 1 food package because I will be spending lots of calories working. But I can give you all the water.' 'How about this, you get one firewood and one food, and I get all the water?' 'No, sorry. How about you get one firewood, two food and all the water?'
Utterance: 'I really need the two food if I only have one firewood.'
[EX A]: No

[EX Q]: Context: 'sounds great' 'Hi;  I thought I was getting 2 firewoods, 2 waters and one food. Is that what we agreed upon?' 'You said you would give me 2 waters and 1 food for your 2 firewoods '
Utterance: 'Yes, does that work for you.  I could give you 1 water and 2 foods as I really need the water for my hike.  I tend to overheat easily. '
[EX A]: No

[EX Q]: Context: 'Got it! I am going to need the most of food. There aren't any animals or berries that I feel safe eating where I'm going.' 'Well I think we can make a good deal then.  How many packages of food would you want?' 'Could we each do 3 of what we need the most? I get three food and you get three water? How do you propose splitting up the firewood?'
Utterance: 'We can do the 3 for 3 trade.  That works perfectly!  Its' going to be cold at night where I'm going.  What's it like where you're heading?'
[EX A]:
No