In this task, you will be shown a sentence, and you should determine whether it is overruling or non-overruling. In law, an overruling sentence is a statement that nullifies a previous case decision as a precedent by a constitutionally valid statute or a decision by the same or higher ranking court which establishes a different rule on the point of law involved. Classify your answers into overruling or non-overruling
--------
Question: appellant argues the alleged charge error ""at least in theory"" could have allowed the jury to convict him for brandishing a hammer.

Answer: non-overruling


Question: to the extent that the holding in travelers ins. co. v. fancher, supra, is inconsistent with our holding here, it is overruled.

Answer: overruling


Question: district of columbia, and the dicta in sims v. rives, and wood v. united states, are in conflict with the foregoing statement they are, to that extent, hereby repudiated.

Answer:
overruling