The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the self-need strategy, otherwise output No. self-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to create a personal need for an item in the negotiation, such as by pointing out that the participant sweats a lot to show preference towards water packages.

Q: Context: 'Hello there, I'm in a lot of need for some firewood! I'd not be against taking most of it if that's alright?' 'Hi, I need the all food package. I will frequently feel hungry'
Utterance: 'I can give you two of the packages if you're willing to give me all 3 of the firewood. I left mine out in the rain a couple of nights ago so its all ruined.'

A: Yes
****
Q: Context: 'I would propose that I get 1 water, 1 food and 3 firewood and you would get 2 water and 2 food' 'I don't mind the division but I would like a pack of firewood added because my family of 7 consume this item as well during the day & night' 'you would have to give more items up to get firewood. if you get more water, which is our highest item, i need more of other items'
Utterance: 'How about 1 water, 2 food and 2 firewood?'

A: No
****
Q: Context: 'What exactly do you mean by majority? As in everything ?' 'I was more thinking 2 Firewood for me , 1 food and 1 water? The rest would be yours.' 'That is a promising bargain but I want at least 2 firewood, it makes for a fun time for my group.'
Utterance: 'Interesting , because my group feels the same way though. How does your group feel about water though?'

A:
Yes
****