We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

[EX Q]: Sent1: All gun control laws do is stop law abiding citizens from having guns!
 Sent2: Gun control laws will not work because criminals do not obey gun control laws!
[EX A]: Similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: And several states have recently passed laws allowing gun owners to carry firearms in more places ��� bars, restaurants, cars and parks.
 Sent2: In some states, some guns are just not allowed and it sticks as a law.
[EX A]: Not similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: We could hypothesize that if guns are banned then law abiding citizens who usually didn't carry or own guns before the ban will be less likely to face armed opponents.
 Sent2: Since civilian marksmanship programs commonly hold civilians to a higher standard than law enforcement officers, would't that mean that in all propreity we should be working to ban cops carrying guns on planes as opposed to law abiding citizens?
[EX A]:
Not similar