TASK DEFINITION: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.
PROBLEM: Comment: Just because they fly them, or should I say 'have a committment to fly them', doesn't mean they are the best choice today.  And besides, of all the countries you list, Australia, Canada, Britain and many others have all bailed. It is an expensive piece of junk that would get shot down in droves using the scenarios that they envisioned for it. Besides, we have no F-22's to provide air cover AND how would you ever install specialized hangers and DC generators in Canada's climate. That, and the exploding fuel tanks. As for the USN, they have flown (1), ONE F-35 off of a carrier. Big hairy deal. Are you even aware of the 'factoid' that both the Russian and Chinese radars can pick these slow moving beasts up 160 KM out from their missile sites (i.e S-400)? Expensive, full of flaws, impossible to maintain without selling the Province of British Columbia to raise cash, and obsolete before they even roll out.

Methinks you are an industry mule.

SOLUTION: Non-sexual-explicit

PROBLEM: Comment: Yeah, that's what the homosexual activists call anything that disagrees with homosexual acts: bullying.  What's really bullying is sticking your penis in someone's anus.

SOLUTION: Sexual-explicit

PROBLEM: Comment: In terms of the PFA - pension funds act, trustees have a fiduciary duty - a duty to act in utmost good faith.
Should trustees breach their fiduciary duty and it constitutes a criminal offence, the trustees can be prosecuted under the Financial Institutions (Investment of Funds) Act, which prescribes a penalty of R10 000 or 10 years imprisonment, or both.

In other words, the trustees can be held personally liable.

If the trustees or Chairperson of the fund approved the unlawful payment to Molefe, which would automatically have been a breach of the fund rules, they can and should be held liable and prosecuted.

Gerrie Nel, here is a slam dunk for you, mate.

Bulldog, get your teeth into this.

SOLUTION:
Non-sexual-explicit