In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: threat and non-threat. Threat is a statement that someone will be hurt or harmed, especially if the person does not do something in particular.

Q: Comment: The Canadians who responded to this poll obviously have limited horizons and are locked in the antiquated nation state paradigm.  Our illustrious, omniscient PM has leap frogged light years ahead of us and, together with a few of his equally narcissistic, delusional friends (such as Bono), sees himself as a leader of the nationless, borderless new world order.

He must find it so tiresome to have to deal with our naive lack of understanding of these things.

A: Non-threat
****
Q: Comment: More personal attacks. A sure sign you're losing the argument. Your excuses are pathetic.

A: Non-threat
****
Q: Comment: No, I am not aware of Wagner’s work.  But books by Jordan, Carrasco, Hallicser and Leibreich about bygone days point to some prodigious sexual activity on the part of priests particularly in the Inquisition years when records are available. I don’t know how you could compare those days with the sexual revolution given the mountain of information we have now and the molehill for then. Thank you again for correcting my summary.

A:
Non-threat
****