Categorize the comment on the basis of obscenity. If the comment is obscene output Yes, otherwise output No.

OK.  But I calls 'em as I sees 'em, and I gave three examples supporting my conclusion.  Could have provided several more (as I mentioned).  But I don't expect everyone to agree with me on every point.

My main goal is to expose--and STOP--the arrogant, irresponsible "animal welfare" simpletons who value PET lives over environmental stability, species-level wildlife extinctions and indeed the lives of their fellow human beings.

As for the rabbits, I must respectfully decline, despite the fact my one remaining cat would probably really enjoy their company.  My daughter loves rabbits and raised them for years when she was younger, but no longer has the time or energy to care for one dealing with three kids (ages 16, 4 and 2).

As for me, was difficult enough to get my land-person to accept renters with a cat, and even more difficult to get her to agree to a second one--a "rescue" I brought home from Sand Pt in 2004.  But thanks anyway.
No

"Law & Order" Fred Stewart has clearly put his personal army of thugs to work, running damage control. So his daughter Hunter is a liar? Her friend (and first hand witness to the assault) is a liar? Fred's ex-wife is a liar? All these people are just lying on poor Fred, right?
Yes

Because its hate against White people. Only works if you are a minority, gay ect....ever hear of the WET (White entertainment tv) nope, not politically correct but its ok to have the BET (Black entertainment tv). How about the NAAWP( national association for the advancement of White people) nope, not politically correct but the NAAACP (national association for the advancement of Colored people) is OK. How about the congressional Black caucus...OK but its a no no to have a congressional White caucus. Its politically correct to hate White people, nothing racist about it.

Yes