In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Input: Consider Input: Comment: You were clearly slamming President Trump.  If he was a old black woman, would you call him that?

So you hope for more diversity in power?  Would that include Sarah Palin, Ben Carson and Caitlin Jenner?

Output: Non-obscene


Input: Consider Input: Comment: Blasted Maoists! Free Tibet!

Output: Obscene


Input: Consider Input: Comment: Naomi Klein and Linda Quaig loved Chavez.  

According to them, he "redirected vast sums of national wealth to the swollen ranks of Venezuela's poor" while leading "the most democratic country in the Western hemisphere."  

"We would vote for Hugo Chavez" claimed Klein in an online petition.

In the world where branding matters, this looks like a bit of a rough patch for the Leap Manifesto.


Output: Non-obscene