We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gay Marriage)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

[EX Q]: Sent1: If inclusion of same sex couples being allowed to marry is what you call "redefining", then the inclusion of interracial couples would also be a "redefiniton."
 Sent2: You did suggest that unmarried heterosexual couples would still be discriminated against, even if we allowed same-sex couples to marry.
[EX A]: Not similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: Yet marriage is not that commitment, according to you; if it were about commitment, the government would be allowing same-sex marriage.
 Sent2: It has to do with ALL INDIVIDUALS (not just those who are gay) being able to freely and legally marry according to the dictates of their OWN FAITH , the same as every heterosexual couple.
[EX A]: Not similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: While they should have allowed gays to get married, it is progress, but they will eventually find out that seperate but equal will not work.
 Sent2: What about gays who adopt should they only be allowed to get married because they adopted a child?
[EX A]:
Not similar