In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Example Input: Comment: No, but when he called the Pharisees white sceplechurs doing things for show, he certainly was. You are taking their side. I am not endorsing sin, but I am saying it is not a device for social control that the reactionaries want it to be. By the way, the shame culture mostly going away in the Church is why so many stopped going to Mass. They no longer felt compelled by a necessitary to have a belief in the belief in God. Put another way, if you had a young person in your life who really did not believe in God, would you insist they go to Communion or even Mass (especially if they would do Communion if they attended)? The answer is they can stop going because they are Apostate and then, and pretty much only then, would their receiving be a sacralidge. Had they masturbated? Not so much.
Example Output: Sexual-explicit

Example Input: Comment: "Many of my lyrics are about having sex with prostitutes."
Robert Richie (Kid Rock)
Example Output: Sexual-explicit

Example Input: Comment: Correct.  I was asking a hypothetical.  I don't think that the state should have intervened in the Schiavo case and should have respected her wishes (although hubby is an abusive jerk.)  However, if she had wished to be kept alive, would you support her right on this or would you want it overturned by courts?
Example Output:
Non-sexual-explicit