We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

[Q]: Sent1: We shouldn't just kill someone if they commit a crime.
 Sent2: If it must be, then we shall find a way to improve these peoples habits, not kill them because they aren't 'like us'.
[A]: Similar


[Q]: Sent1: You make it sound as though if someone is innocent, of anything, they should be killed.
 Sent2: if someone killed you wouldn't you want them dead?
[A]: Not similar


[Q]: Sent1: If we sentence someone to life in prison, we can always free them at a later time if they are found to be innocent.
 Sent2: They shouldn't want to send an innocent person to prison for life either so it should have been pretty clear they were guilty already.
[A]:
Not similar