We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Q: Sent1: So, no, I wouldn't say there was any "gun control" as you (Galileo) tried to pass off as early gun control laws.
 Sent2: Name me one gun control law that has been effective as crime control!!!!!!

A: Not similar
****
Q: Sent1: Then we should ban so stupid people can't kill people with guns.
 Sent2: Since there are gun deaths in countries that have banned guns, the gun bans did not work.

A: Not similar
****
Q: Sent1: The opposite of "more guns = less crime is not true" is not "more guns = more crime".
 Sent2: All that does is imply that crime rate depends on more than just the presence/absence of guns - it disproves 'more guns = more crime' about as much as it disproves 'more guns = less crime'.

A:
Similar
****