The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the self-need strategy, otherwise output No. self-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to create a personal need for an item in the negotiation, such as by pointing out that the participant sweats a lot to show preference towards water packages.

[EX Q]: Context: 'The basics of man -  food and water' 'Ah, okay, I could use some of that too! Which one do you need most?' 'water. How about you?'
Utterance: 'I could use water, too, but I'd be willing to give some up if you give me more items overall'
[EX A]: Yes

[EX Q]: Context: 'i need the firewood because i tend to catch a cold easily and also scared of the dark. i can give you 2 water and 2 food for 3 firewood and i food' 'will you allow me to get 3 waters and you can have the 3 firewood and 2 foods? 🙂' 'yes i can agree to that, thats a good compromise'
Utterance: 'yay, thank you so much! to very I am getting 3 waters, 0 firewood, and 1 food?'
[EX A]: No

[EX Q]: Context: 'I do need some food. I would like to get at least 1 food. You can still get 3 firewood.' 'I could use water as well, so I could get 1 water, 2 food and 2 firewood' 'I am good at making fire and have a starter so I can give up all the wood.'
Utterance: 'I still need 1 water, don't have a water purify kit. ☹️'
[EX A]:
Yes