Categorize the comment on the basis of severe toxicity. If the comment is severely toxic output Yes, otherwise output No.
--------
Question: the liberal propaganda machine is in full swing. These shameless liberals will be dominating the RG op-ed page till the election puking their shameless lies to try and get Vinis elected. These shameless lying liberals will do everything they can to deflect from the fact Vinis has absolutely no experience or qualifications to be mayor of the 2nd largest city in Oregon.

Answer: Yes


Question: I see the user guide above, but does Civil offer any advice on what should be flagged? I see three options in Flag: "abuse/harassment, spam or threat to self or others". Those last two are fairly clear, but I can imagine disagreement on the first. I'd be interested in which of the comments below rises to abuse/harassment and I imagine there is disagreement within commenters. 

A. "This is a horrible idea".
B. "This is the dumbest idea I've ever heard of and anyone who supports it is doesn't understand the underlying issues".
C. "Anyone who supports this awful idea is ignorant".
D. "Anyone who supports this awful idea is an idiot"
E. "I can't believe you support this idea- you must be an idiot".

Answer: Yes


Question: You are correct, but you have to also understand that this just makes the protesters look like foolish, intolerant, children. This kind of behavior is becoming more and more common and I think Trump is a direct result of this kind of new liberalism. 

These people did EXACTLY what the Trumpkins wanted.

Answer:
No