The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the self-need strategy, otherwise output No. self-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to create a personal need for an item in the negotiation, such as by pointing out that the participant sweats a lot to show preference towards water packages.

Ex Input:
Context: 'That sounds like a blast.   I would like to propose that you take 2 waters and 1 firewood and I'll take 2 firewoods and 1 water for our respective trips.  Does that work for you?' 'Yes, we are all looking forward to it. Thanks for being amenable and trying to make this work. That might be okay, but could we take take the 3 packages of food? Since we won't be doing as big of a bonfire, I am sure we'll hike more or swim and need the extra energy' 'I was hoping to take at least some of the food with me.  As you know, those teenagers seem to hungry ALL the time.  It's like feeding fuel into a bottomless pit.  So I'm definitely going to need some of the food for my trip as well.'
Utterance: 'Hm okay. Would 1 packet of food be sufficient? I know they are growing but my friends are ex football players and can eat 3x the normal person'

Ex Output:
No


Ex Input:
Context: 'ME as well! we are a group of big eaters, and are looking to take lots of food.' 'That is fair as there is no showers or sinks at my campsite so I am looking to take water :) ' 'We will likely also need to take water too. Need to be able to wash up.'
Utterance: 'That is fair, I also will need a good bit of firewood to keep warm as the campsite is in a colder area.'

Ex Output:
Yes


Ex Input:
Context: 'Hello. I'm going to do a lot of hiking on my camping trip and need as much water as possible. I'm also planning a bonfire with fellow campers in the area, so I'd like as much firewood as possible. How about I keep the water and firewood and you keep the food?' 'That doesn't work for me. I will also need extra water because I drink a lot. How about we start by saying you get the firewood, and I'll take the food?' 'OK, but how do we split up the water? Because it sounds like we both need some. What if you take all the food and I take all the firewood and then I get two waters and you get one extra?'
Utterance: 'I would prefer to have 2 waters since I agreed to give you all the firewood.'

Ex Output:

No