Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.

Ex Input:
You do understand that you can't prove a negative right? People of faith are the ones making wild ass claims about magic sky wizards with no supporting evidence it is incumbent on them to provide proof of their claims not the other way around.

Ex Output:
No


Ex Input:
What the fuck is with this 'civil comments' horseshit? We don't have ENOUGH censorship from these communist fuckwits at ADN?!!

ADN CAN FUCKING CHOKE.

Ex Output:
Yes


Ex Input:
Shnitz hates women? No, he just prefers to use them for group sex and if you do biz with him, you can be pretty sure he will bring one of his many women around for you to play with while he takes pictures. Hmm, where do those photos go?  Maybe this is one of many reasons his marriage ended so terribly.  Hearing him talk to one of his many nannies who took his daughters to the beach with a bunch of friends and asking repeatedly if they were being touchy feely and flirty is creepy! He kept encouraging the nanny to give them alone time to play. Seriously?!?!  Snitz is single for a reason. If you date him, you date his friends too. The horror stories of multiple women are all so similar. Charming, come out to all these fancy places, come on my plane, oh and on my friends too.  His daughter's aren't as dumb as he'd like and they are well aware of his shenanigans.  I'd go crazy too if my dad paraded all this in front of me while being left alone with some nanny of the month.  Poor kids..

Ex Output:

Yes