We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Example Input: Sent1: The fact remains that life in prison is cheaper than sentencing one to the death penalty.
 Sent2: Without the trials and appeals, death penalty cases would be much cheaper than confining inmates for the rest of their lives.
Example Output: Not similar

Example Input: Sent1: The death penalty has not been shown to be more effective than life imprisonment in deterring murder, hence we should choose life imprisonment.
 Sent2: A life sentence does not prevent a murderer from murdering again.
Example Output: Not similar

Example Input: Sent1: I believe that societies should punish criminals to the degree that they have to based on sound rational reasons.
 Sent2: The reason why I'm for death penalty is because some people can be so dangerous fir the society, like serial murderer or maniac, so that they must be punished by this method.
Example Output:
Not similar