The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.

[EX Q]: Context: 'I would prefer to have all 3 water, but I think I can make an exception since you have offered me all 3 food 🙂 Just to confirm, this means that you get 3 firewood and 1 water and I get 2 water and 3 food. Correct?' 'Yes 🙂 Do you want to make a deal?' 'Sure 🙂'
Utterance: 'Thanks good negotiating with you! 😮'
[EX A]: No

[EX Q]: Context: 'i think i should have 2 waters because i will need to put the fire out to protect the forest.' 'Well, if we can't settle on an agreement i'm going to walk away. We agreed I will get all 3 extra packages of the food but I still wish for the 2 extra wood and 2 extra waters' 'no we agree that you would get 3 food, i would get 3 waters'
Utterance: 'It's agreed, I will get 3 extra packs of food, you will get 3 waters but the extra wood for my kids is needed how about I get 2 extra firewood?'
[EX A]: Yes

[EX Q]: Context: 'Good!  How are you?' 'I'm doing well! Almost ready for my camping trip. Need some more supplies though.' 'Which supplies do you need?'
Utterance: 'Well, I really need water in case we get really thirsty from hiking. I also need firewood in case it gets colder and we need more. It would be cool to have more food added for dessert like s'mores, but it's not really necessary.'
[EX A]:
Yes