In this task, you are given a passage which has a question and the context. You have to generate an answer to the question based on the information present in the context.

Q: Context: High arginase-1 (Arg) expression by myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSC) is known to inhibit antitumor T-cell responses through depletion of l-arginine. We have previously shown that nitric oxide (NO), an immune mediator produced from l-arginine, is a potent radiosensitizer of hypoxic tumor cells. This study therefore examines whether Arg(+) overexpressing MDSC may confer radioresistance through depleting the substrate for NO synthesis.', 'MDSC and Arg expression were studied in preclinical mouse CT26 and 4T1 tumor models and further validated in rectal cancer patients in comparison with healthy donors. The radioprotective effect of MDSC was analyzed in hypoxic tumor cells with regard to l-arginine depletion.', 'In both mouse tumors and cancer patients, MDSC expansion was associated with Arg activation causing accelerated l-arginine consumption. l-Arginine depletion in turn profoundly suppressed the capacity of classically activated macrophages to synthesize NO resulting in impaired tumor cell radiosensitivity. In advanced cT3-4 rectal cancer, circulating neutrophils revealed Arg overexpression approaching that in MDSC, therefore mounting a protumor compartment wherein Arg(+) neutrophils increased from 17% to over 90%.\Question: Do myeloid-derived suppressor cells reveal radioprotective properties through arginase-induced l-arginine depletion?

A: Protumor Arg(+) MDSC reveal a unique ability to radioprotect tumor cells through l-arginine depletion, a common mechanism behind both T-cell and macrophage inhibition.
****
Q: Context: We previously reported that human OA subchondral bone osteoblasts could be discriminated into two subpopulations identified by their levels of endogenous production (low [L] or high [H]) of PGE(2). Here, we investigated the OPG and RANKL expression levels, the histologic analysis of the subchondral bone as well as the osteoclast differentiation effect of osteoblasts on normal and both OA subpopulations (L and H), and further examined on the L OA osteoblasts the modulation of bone remodelling factors on the OPG and RANKL levels, as well as on the resorption activity.', 'Gene expression was determined using real-time PCR, PGE2 and OPG levels by specific ELISA, and membranous RANKL by flow cytometry. Histological observation of the subchondral bone was performed on human knee specimens. Osteoclast differentiation and formation was assayed by using the pre-osteoclastic cell line RAW 264.7. OPG and RANKL modulation on L OA osteoblasts was monitored following treatment with osteotropic factors, and the resorption activity was studied by the co-culture of differentiated PBMC/osteoblasts.', 'Human OA subchondral bone osteoblasts expressed less OPG than normal. Compared to normal, RANKL gene expression levels were increased in L OA and decreased in H OA cells. The OPG/RANKL mRNA ratio was significantly diminished in L OA compared to normal or H OA (p<0.02, p<0.03), and markedly increased in H OA compared to normal. Inhibition of endogenous PGE(2) levels by indomethacin markedly decreased the ratio of OPG/RANKL on the H OA. In contrast to H OA osteoblasts, L OA cells induced a significantly higher level of osteoclast differentiation and formation (p<0.05). Histological analysis showed a reduced subchondral bone on the L OA and an increased bone mass on the H OA compared to normal. Treatment of L OA osteoblasts with osteotropic factors revealed that the OPG/RANKL mRNA expression ratio was significantly reduced by vitamin D(3) and significantly increased by TNF-alpha, PTH and PGE(2), while IL-1Beta demonstrated no effect. OPG protein levels showed similar profiles. No true effect was noted on membranous RANKL upon treatment with IL-1Beta, PGE(2) and PTH, but a significant increase was observed with vitamin D3 and TNF-alpha. The resorption activity of the L OA cells was significantly inhibited by all treatments except IL-1Beta, with maximum effect observed with vitamin D(3) and PGE(2).\Question: Is the differential expression of osteoprotegerin ( OPG ) and receptor activator of nuclear factor kappaB ligand ( RANKL ) in human osteoarthritic subchondral bone osteoblasts an indicator of the metabolic state of these disease cells?

A: OPG and RANKL levels, and consequently the OPG/RANKL ratio, differed according to human OA subchondral bone osteoblast classification; it is decreased in L and increased in H OA. These findings, in addition to those showing that L OA osteoblasts have a reduced subchondral bone mass and induce a higher level of osteoclast differentiation, strongly suggest that the metabolic state of the L OA osteoblasts favours bone resorption.
****
Q: Context: Cancer immunotherapy refers to an array of strategies intended to treat progressive tumors by augmenting a patient's anti-tumor immune response. As immunotherapy is eventually incorporated into oncology treatment paradigms, it is important to understand how these therapies interact with established cancer treatments such as chemotherapy or Radiotherapy (RT). To address this, we utilized a well-established, autochthonous murine model of prostate cancer to test whether RT could augment (or diminish) the CD4 T cell response to a tumor vaccine.", 'Transgenic mice that develop spontaneous prostate cancer (TRAMP) which also express a unique tumor associated antigen (Influenza hemagglutinin) under the control of a prostate-specific promoter were given local RT in combination with immunotherapy. The immunological outcome of this combinatorial strategy was assayed by monitoring the effector response of adoptively transferred, prostate-specific CD4 T cells.', 'Neither RT nor immunotherapy alone was capable of priming an anti-tumor immune response in animals with evolving tumors. The combination of immunotherapy with RT resulted in anti-tumor T cell activation--this effect was profoundly dependent on the relative timing of RT and immunotherapy. Anti-tumor immune responses occurred when immunotherapy was administered 3-5 weeks post-RT, but such responses were undetectable when immunotherapy was administered either earlier (peri-radiotherapy) or later.\Question: Does radiotherapy augment the immune response to prostate cancer in a time-dependent manner?

A:
The therapeutic temporal window of immunotherapy post-RT suggests that highly aggressive, immuno-suppressive tumors might be most sensitive to immunotherapy in a fairly narrow time window; these results should help to guide future development of clinical combinatorial strategies.
****