In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence can be inferred from the statement. Incorrect choices change the meaning in important ways or have details that are not mentioned in the statement. Indicate your answer as 1,2, or 3 corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.

[EX Q]: Statement: When you hear that despite the fact that he has economists who know better, the Justice Department's Joel Klein apparently either believes or chooses to claim that this case is about path dependence, you start to wonder. Choices:  1. Joel Klein is lying about the case, and it's obvious why. 2. Joel Klein's claim that the case is about path dependence is fully backed up by his economists. 3. Joel Klein says that this case is about path dependence, even though the economists who work for him know that isn't true.
[EX A]: 3

[EX Q]: Statement: It's that they don't study with the ferociousness and all-out commitment of people who realize (or who have parents who realize) that outstanding school performance is their one shot at big-time opportunity in America. Choices:  1. There is more opportunity in America for the well educated. 2. Anyone who is successful in America is well educated. 3. Success in America depends upon doing well in school.
[EX A]: 1

[EX Q]: Statement: oh i see uh-huh okay so they know that and they Choices:  1. I see that they know that, and they still want to go? 2. I see, they don't know that do they? 3. They know that.
[EX A]:
3