Given a document, an entity and its sentiment towards the entity, verify if it is the correct sentiment towards the entity. Answer should be yes or no. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

[EX Q]: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Hillary Clinton is Negative . Speaking to the media reports of a possible Special Counsel in the offing over  her  Uranium One deal to the leftist media outlet Mother Jones  the former first lady  former Secretary of State and former Democratic nominee for president said :
 Hillary Clinton  would have you believe prosecuting corruption and holding anyone accountable is something only tinpot dictatorships do.
âIf they send a signal that weâre going to be like some dictatorship  like some authoritarian regime  where political opponents are going to be unfairly  fraudulently investigated  that rips at the fabric of the contract we have  that we can trust our justice system â  Clinton  said. âIt will be incredibly demoralizing to people who have served at the Justice Department  under both Republicans and Democrats  because they know better. But it will also send a terrible signal to our country and the world that somehow we are giving up on the kind of values that we used to live by and we used to promote worldwide.â
 Hillary Clinton  has been getting away with corruption for so long  she  doesn't see  herself  as subject to the law at all. There was  her  illegal private server   her  destruction of government emails and tech machinery 'with hammers ' amounting to obstruction of justice  there was  her  collusion with Fusion GPS which took phony "opposition research" from the Russians for use in an investigation and leakfest against Donald Trump and this doesn't even cover the half of it. During  her  tenure as Secretary of State  there were classified documents mishandled (left on the dashboard of cars on overseas trips)  the Benghazi failure to protect American personnel overseas  the Benghazi talking points coverup  a missing $2 billion in financial mismanagement and more. Scroll further back and the corruption continues in the same pattern: Whitewater  the cattle futures cleanup  the missing billing records and "I don't recall." lt likely goes even further back than that with the NGOs and the Nixon investigation. Any wonder the late William Safire called her 'a congenital liar' and the number one reason voters rejected her according to a Soros group  was the public perception of her as untrustworthy?
I've got news for her: Banana republics  tinpot dictatorships  and authoritarian regimes do not prosecute big-dollar corruption among the politically connected. Going by pay-to-play rules is how they operate. That's how Mugabe in Africa and Chavistas in Venezuela and assorted characters in the Indonesia of the  Clinton  era operate. It's what makes them banana republics in the first place.
Far from the act of prosecuting corruption being a problem  as  Hillary Clinton  would have you believe  operating on pay-to-play principles and expecting to get away with it is what makes a place a tinpot regime.
[EX A]: yes

[EX Q]: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Paul Haggis is Positive . âI havenât seen that  no â the stunned Swank told Fox News at an FX event in Pasadena  Calif. of the report released just minutes earlier about  Paul Haggis   who won consecutive Oscars for screenwriting the Swank-starring "Million Dollar Baby" and writing and directing "Crash."
 Haggis  was named in a civil lawsuit on December 15  2017 by publicist Haleigh Breest  who claimed the married  64-year-old filmmaker raped her on Jan. 31  2013 in a New York City apartment.
The lawsuit spurred three more women to claim sexual assault and harassment by  Haggis .
According to the Associated Press  one of the accusers claimed  Haggis  made  her  perform non-consensual oral sex and then raped  her .
Another accuser said  Haggis  told  her  âI need to be inside  you .â  She  said  she  was able to escape.
They all said  Haggis  first tried to kiss them. In two of the cases  they said  when they fought back   Haggis  escalated  his  aggression.
The new rape accuser said she was a 28-year-old publicist working on a television show being produced by  Haggis  in 1996 when he called to ask to review photos from the show that night in her office.
When  Haggis  arrived  she said  everyone else had left the office for the night and  he  insisted they speak in a back office. She said  Haggis  began kissing her as soon as they walked into the room.
"I just pulled away.  He  was just glaring at me and came at me again. I was really resisting.  He  said to me  'Do you really want to continue working?'" the woman said. "And then  he  really forced  himself  on me. I was just numb. I didn't know what to do."
 Haggis â lawyer told the AP his client is denying the new accusations  saying  âHe didnât rape anybody.â
 Haggis  has also denied Breest's initial rape allegation in a counter-complaint to the lawsuit  and said the accuser and her lawyer had demanded a $9 million payment to avoid legal action  which he characterized as extortion.
Fox News reached out to  Haggis  and Breest but did not receive comment.
 Haggis  is also well-known for being an outspoken critic of Scientology  which  he  left in 2009.  He  is listed as currently directing the film "Lead and Copper."
[EX A]: no

[EX Q]: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Donald J. Trump is Neutral . ObamaCare is a broken mess. Piece by piece we will now begin the process of giving America the great HealthCare it deserves! — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) October 13  2017
Paul Ryan supports  Trump 's decision to end the Obamacare cost-sharing payments and gives no indication that Congress will appropriate them. pic.twitter.com/7c6tVaFoV0 — Sahil Kapur (@sahilkapur) October 13  2017
2. Critics of  Trump ’s decision to end CSR payments seem to forget a federal judge called them unconstitutional and ordered that they stop. — Michael F. Cannon (@mfcannon) October 13  2017
--But the  Trump  administration is injecting turbulence into the Obamacare marketplaces by cutting off the payments just as insurers are finalizing their 2018 plan offerings. Losing the approximately $7 billion in annual payments  which reimburse insurers for discounting deductibles and co-payments for the lowest-income enrollees  is grounds for insurers to back out of their federal contracts to even sell plans next year. The administration had been making the payments on a month-to-month basis  prompting complaints by insurers about a lack of certainty as they tried to plan ahead.
Even a Republican (who is retiring next year) slammed  Trump . Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen (R-Fla.):
It really is remarkable how differently retiring and non-retiring congressional Republicans talk about  President Trump . — Sahil Kapur (@sahilkapur) October 13  2017
 TRUMP TEMPERATURE
--Yesterday  President Trump  signed an anticipated executive order intended to circumvent certain ACA rules by making it easier for individuals and small business to buy alternative types of health insurance with lower prices but fewer benefits  The Post's Amy Goldstein reports.
"The White House and allies portray  the president’s  move as wielding administrative powers to accomplish what congressional Republicans have failed to achieve: fostering more coverage choices while tearing down the law’s insurance marketplaces " Amy writes. "The order represents  Trump ’s biggest step to date to reverse the health-care policies of the Obama administration  a central promise since last year’s presidential campaign.
"Critics  who include state insurance commissioners  most of the health-insurance industry and mainstream policy specialists  predict that a proliferation of these other kinds of coverage will have damaging ripple effects: driving up costs for consumers with serious medical conditions and prompting more insurers to flee the law’s marketplaces. Part of  Trump ’s action  they say  will spark court challenges over  its  legality."
--It expands the availability of short-term insurance policies  which offer limited benefits as a bridge for people between jobs or young adults no longer eligible for their parents’ health plans. The Obama administration ruled that short-term insurance may not last for more than three months;  Trump  wants to extend that to nearly a year.
Of course   Trump  insisted yesterday that  he  was providing "Obamacare relief" in remarks shortly before signing the order. "This will cost the United States government virtually nothing and people will have great  great  healthcare "  he  said. "And when i say people  I mean by the millions and millions."
Members of  Trump 's Cabinet of course cheered the move. Treasury Secertary Steven Mnuchin's statement  per Reuters' Pete Schroeder:
Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin puts out a statement praising  Trump  for his healthcare EO. For some reason. pic.twitter.com/d4YZ4aidfB — Pete Schroeder (@peteschroeder) October 12  2017
How  Trump 's executive order could weaken Obamacare:
Here's how the 25th Amendment works:
[EX A]:
no