instruction:
The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.
question:
Context: 'so you'll get 3 food, 1 firewood and I'll get 2 firewood and 3 water?' 'correct' 'ok I can do that. after the next message I am happy to send over the proposal'
Utterance: 'sure thing'
answer:
No


question:
Context: 'Hi there, good to connect with you. How are you today?' 'I am good, thank you.  What are your preferences? I really need the extra food packages.  We are doing a lot of hiking and mountain biking and there are no grocery stores for at least 50 miles.🙂'
Utterance: 'Oh wow that is quite a lot of hiking! I think we will be hanging out a lot overnight and so I am looking for more firewood if possible. My kids can't hike very far and want to do more with smores and marshmellows. '
answer:
Yes


question:
Context: 'I need a lot of food today. I was advised to eat at least 4 times a day so i may need all the food packages.' 'Well that is not going to work well for my family of 8 now is it? Haha. I think we can come to some sort of agreement though.🙂' 'What do you propose?'
Utterance: 'I really need food too, but I am willing to deal and let my kids go hungry I guess ☹️ I propose I get one food, 3 firewood and 1 water.  '
answer:

Yes