We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

Input: Consider Input: New proposals invariable seek to criminalize possession by the public, possession which is perfectly lawful and harms no one, creating victimless crimes, and malum prohibitum laws that reduce freedom.

Output: Valid


Input: Consider Input: The Second Amendment isn't a gun control law, it's an individual right, independent from militia service.

Output: Valid


Input: Consider Input: (NJ, (again with no RKBA provision), has not developed a sophisticated legal history of the RKBA under state law, they have just lazily relied on the federal cases; see Burton v. Sills, 248 A.2d 521 (N.J. 1968))


Output: Valid