TASK DEFINITION: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.
PROBLEM: Comment: Well, we sure are touchy about "words".  But real action is no big deal, right?  I especially like the comment in the article that Trump's quicker to act to defend Muslims...by sending cruise missiles.  LMAO...uh, you think those babies don't take out humans?  

And, the humans on that base were likely Muslim.  So, we're protecting Muslims by killing Muslims.  Said that way, it's kinda counter-productive, isn't it?

SOLUTION: Non-sexual-explicit

PROBLEM: Comment: I agree with Ms. McAnulty! I wonder what reaction there would be if a bunch of guys wore red cock and blue balls hats and marched around the city center. I expect it would be negative in the extreme no matter what they were protesting or supporting. There are certainly better ways to express dissatisfaction with President Trump than to stoop to vulgarity which is what I consider was done by those who marched with their pink genitalia hats.

SOLUTION: Sexual-explicit

PROBLEM: Comment: I am sure gay Catholics would prefer someone out and proud. Just like as a hetero Catholic, I would rather a patron who enjoyed sex, not one who prayed afterwards for the conception of a child. Being sexually active with a wife and enjoying it is not a vice or a secondary vocation.

SOLUTION:
Sexual-explicit