We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.
--------
Question: Sent1: I think there should be a death penalty because, all those innocent people getting killed for no damn reason is unfair.
 Sent2: With all this talk about innocent people being put to death, I was wondering.

Answer: Not similar


Question: Sent1: If they know they'll die if caught, they'll likely kill more rape victims and children.
 Sent2: >>>If we are sure they raped & killed those innocent children then we should let them die.

Answer: Not similar


Question: Sent1: Unless there can be solid uncontestable evidence shown that the death penalty is significant in deterring crime, this cannot be used as an argument for the death penalty.
 Sent2: SO in turn, there is no clear evidence indicating that there is not a detterent value to the death penalty.

Answer:
Similar