In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Ex Input:
Comment: Trolls should stay under the bridge.
Old tactic; if you can't refute the message - attack the messenger

Ex Output:
Non-obscene


Ex Input:
Comment: I also applaud Ab. Chaput.   But why call this a  a progressive issue?  This is the response anyone should have to racist hate.  It's what any Christian, any reasonable person of any religion should have to Nazi rhetoric.

Ex Output:
Non-obscene


Ex Input:
Comment: This will be interesting to follow and see how it concludes re: continuing to be licensed to teach in Oregon or not. There is a relatively new movement to have real time communication between school district's across the nation and having access to their work history. It has been that a "fired, released, bad, incompetent" teacher would simply apply to another State and be hired. This young lady does not have the maturity, discipline nor common sense to guide the young lives of children!

Ex Output:

Non-obscene