instruction:
In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.
question:
Comment: seems to me Dick your padding your assumptions a bit about the "largest voice of the people". 
  The largest voice of the Conoco caucus maybe and the oil lobby...,..but it seems like the people only get two minutes, and the oil lobbyists and legislators get richer..
answer:
Non-identity-attack


question:
Comment: "It doesn't keep elections 'pure' it just drives the money into STUPID AREAS"

Well, that's a useful bunch of gibberish. It's not like there aren't elections all around the world with campaign finance laws that work quite well.

"You want to get good candidates get rid of every restriction BUT the REPORTING requirements."

Here's a better idea: leave every candidate with limited but equal financing -- so that candidates focus solely on explaining why their policy is superior to all others -- and every citizen, whether billionaire or hobo has but one equal voice.

It's "one man one vote" not "one dollar one vote."
answer:
Non-identity-attack


question:
Comment: When's the BLM rally to protest the shooting of unarmed black people? Oh yeah, I forgot that black lives only seem to matter when the shooter is white. When the shooter is black,  we just ignore the situaion and move on.
answer:

Identity-attack