In this task, you are given text for US Congressional and California state bills, your task is to generate a summary for this bill.

Example Input: SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Facilitating Access to Speedy 
Transmissions for Networks, E-commerce and Telecommunications (FASTNET) 
Act''.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS AND PURPOSE.

    (a) Findings.--Congress finds the following:
            (1) The Telecommunications Act of 1996 was enacted to 
        foster the rapid deployment of advanced telecommunications and 
        information technologies and services to all Americans by 
        promoting competition and reducing regulation in 
        telecommunications markets nationwide.
            (2) The Telecommunications Act of 1966 specifically 
        recognized the unique abilities and circumstances of local 
        exchange carriers with fewer than two percent of the Nation's 
        subscriber lines installed in the aggregate nationwide.
            (3) Given the markets two percent carriers typically serve, 
        such carriers are uniquely positioned to accelerate the 
        deployment of advanced services and competitive initiatives for 
        the benefit of consumers in less densely populated regions of 
        the Nation.
            (4) Existing regulations are typically tailored to the 
        circumstances of larger carriers and therefore often impose 
        disproportionate burdens on two percent carriers, impeding such 
        carriers' deployment of advanced telecommunications services 
        and competitive initiatives to consumers in less densely 
        populated regions of the Nation.
            (5) Reducing regulatory burdens on two percent carriers 
        will enable such carriers to devote additional resources to the 
        deployment of advanced services and to competitive initiatives 
        to benefit consumers in less densely populated regions of the 
        Nation.
            (6) Reducing regulatory burdens on two percent carriers 
        will increase such carriers' ability to respond to marketplace 
        conditions, allowing them to accelerate deployment of advanced 
        services and competitive initiatives to benefit consumers in 
        less densely populated regions of the Nation.
    (b) Purposes.--The purposes of this Act are--
            (1) to accelerate the deployment of advanced services and 
        the development of competition in the telecommunications 
        industry for the benefit of consumers in all regions of the 
        Nation, consistent with the Telecommunications Act of 1996, by 
        reducing regulatory burdens on local exchange carriers with 
        fewer than two percent of the Nation's subscriber lines 
        installed in the aggregate nationwide;
            (2) to improve such carriers' flexibility to undertake such 
        initiatives; and
            (3) to allow such carriers to redirect resources from 
        paying the costs of such regulatory burdens to increasing 
        investment in such initiatives.

SEC. 3. DEFINITION.

    Section 3 of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 153) is 
amended--
            (1) by redesignating paragraphs (51) and (52) as paragraphs 
        (52) and (53), respectively; and
            (2) by inserting after paragraph (50) the following:
            ``(51) Two percent carrier.--The term `two percent carrier' 
        means an incumbent local exchange carrier within the meaning of 
        section 251(h) whose access lines, when aggregated with the 
        access lines of any local exchange carrier that such incumbent 
        local exchange carrier directly or indirectly controls, is 
        controlled by, or is under common control with, are fewer than 
        two percent of the Nation's subscriber lines installed in the 
        aggregate nationwide.''.

SEC. 4. REGULATORY RELIEF FOR TWO PERCENT CARRIERS.

    Title II of the Communications Act of 1934 is amended by adding at 
the end thereof a new part IV as follows:

         ``PART IV--PROVISIONS CONCERNING TWO PERCENT CARRIERS

``SEC. 281. REDUCED REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS FOR TWO PERCENT CARRIERS.

    ``(a) Commission To Take Into Account Differences.--In adopting 
rules that apply to incumbent local exchange carriers (within the 
meaning of section 251(h)), the Commission shall separately evaluate 
the burden that any proposed regulatory, compliance, or reporting 
requirements would have on two percent carriers.
    ``(b) Effect of Commission's Failure To Take Into Account 
Differences.--If the Commission adopts a rule that applies to incumbent 
local exchange carriers and fails to separately evaluate the burden 
that any proposed regulatory, compliance, or reporting requirement 
would have on two percent carriers, the Commission shall not enforce 
the rule against two percent carriers unless and until the Commission 
performs such separate evaluation.
    ``(c) Additional Review Not Required.--Nothing in this section 
shall be construed to require the Commission to conduct a separate 
evaluation under subsection (a) if the rules adopted do not apply to 
two percent carriers, or such carriers are exempted from such rules.
    ``(d) Savings Clause.--Nothing in this section shall be construed 
to prohibit any size-based differentiation among carriers mandated by 
this Act, chapter 6 of title 5, United State Code, the Commission's 
rules, or any other provision of law.
    ``(e) Effective Date.--The provisions of this section shall apply 
with respect to any rule adopted on or after the date of enactment of 
this section.

``SEC. 282. LIMITATION OF REPORTING REQUIREMENTS.

    ``(a) Limitation.--The Commission shall not require a two percent 
carrier--
            ``(1) to file cost allocation manuals or to have such 
        manuals audited or attested, but a two percent carrier that 
        qualifies as a class A carrier shall annually certify to the 
        Commission that the two percent carrier's cost allocation 
        complies with the rules of the Commission; or
            ``(2) to file Automated Reporting and Management 
        Information Systems (ARMIS) reports, except for purposes of 
        section 224.
    ``(b) Preservation of Authority.--Except as provided in subsection 
(a), nothing in this Act limits the authority of the Commission to 
obtain access to information under sections 211, 213, 215, 218, and 220 
with respect to two percent carriers.

``SEC. 283. INTEGRATED OPERATION OF TWO PERCENT CARRIERS.

    ``The Commission shall not require any two percent carrier to 
establish or maintain a separate affiliate to provide any common 
carrier or noncommon carrier services, including local and 
interexchange services, commercial mobile radio services, advanced 
services (within the meaning of section 706 of the Telecommunications 
Act of 1996), paging, Internet, information services or other enhanced 
services, or other services. The Commission shall not require any two 
percent carrier and its affiliates to maintain separate officers, 
directors, or other personnel, network facilities, buildings, research 
and development departments, books of account, financing, marketing, 
provisioning, or other operations.

``SEC. 284. PARTICIPATION IN TARIFF POOLS AND PRICE CAP REGULATION.

    ``(a) NECA Pool.--The participation or withdrawal from 
participation by a two percent carrier of one or more study areas in 
the common line tariff administered and filed by the National Exchange 
Carrier Association or any successor tariff or administrator shall not 
obligate such carrier to participate or withdraw from participation in 
such tariff for any other study area. The Commission may require a two 
percent carrier to give 60 days notice of its intent to participate or 
withdraw from participation in such common line tariff with respect to 
a study area. Except as permitted by section 310(f)(3), a two percent 
carrier's election under this subsection shall be binding for one year 
from the date of the election.
    ``(b) Price Cap Regulation.--A two percent carrier may elect to be 
regulated by the Commission under price cap rate regulation, or elect 
to withdraw from such regulation, for one or more of its study areas. 
The Commission shall not require a carrier making an election under 
this subsection with respect to any study area or areas to make the 
same election for any other study area. Except as permitted by section 
310(f)(3), a two percent carrier's election under this subsection shall 
be binding for one year from the date of the election.

``SEC. 285. DEPLOYMENT OF NEW TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES BY TWO 
              PERCENT COMPANIES.

    ``(a) One-Day Notice of Deployment.--The Commission shall permit 
two percent carriers to introduce new interstate telecommunications 
services by filing a tariff on one day's notice showing the charges, 
classifications, regulations, and practices therefor, without obtaining 
a waiver, or make any other showing before the Commission in advance of 
the tariff filing. The Commission shall not have authority to approve 
or disapprove the rate structure for such services shown in such 
tariff.
    ``(b) Definition.--For purposes of subsection (a), the term `new 
interstate telecommunications service' means a class or subclass of 
service not previously offered by the two percent carrier that enlarges 
the range of service options available to ratepayers of such carrier.

``SEC. 286. ENTRY OF COMPETING CARRIER.

    ``(a) Pricing Flexibility.--Notwithstanding any other provision of 
this Act, any two percent carrier shall be permitted to de-average its 
interstate switched or special access rates, file tariffs on one day's 
notice, and file contract-based tariffs for interstate switched or 
special access services immediately upon certifying to the Commission 
that a telecommunications carrier unaffiliated with such carrier is 
engaged in facilities-based entry within such carrier's service area. A 
two percent carrier subject to rate-of-return regulation with respect 
to an interstate switched or special access service, for which pricing 
flexibility has been exercised pursuant to this subsection, shall 
compute its interstate rate of return based on the nondiscounted rate 
for such service.
    ``(b) Streamlined Pricing Regulation.--Notwithstanding any other 
provision of this Act, upon receipt by the Commission of a 
certification by a two percent carrier that--
            ``(1) a local exchange carrier, or its affiliate, or
            ``(2) a local exchange carrier operated by, or owned in 
        whole or part by, a governmental authority,
is engaged in facilities-based entry within the two percent carrier's 
service area, the Commission shall regulate the two percent carrier as 
non-dominant and shall not require the tariffing of the interstate 
service offerings of the two percent carrier.
    ``(c) Participation in Exchange Carrier Association Tariff.--A two 
percent carrier that meets the requirements of subsection (a) or (b) of 
this section with respect to one or more study areas shall be permitted 
to participate in the common line tariff administered and filed by the 
National Exchange Carrier Association or any successor tariff or 
administrator, by electing to include one or more of its study areas in 
such tariff.
    ``(d) Definitions.--For purposes of this section:
            ``(1) Facilities-based entry.--The term `facilities-based 
        entry' means, within the service area of a two percent 
        carrier--
                    ``(A) the provision or procurement of local 
                telephone exchange switching or its equivalent; and
                    ``(B) the provision of telephone exchange service 
                to at least one unaffiliated customer.
            ``(2) Contract-based tariff.--The term `contract-based 
        tariff' shall mean a tariff based on a service contract entered 
        into between a two percent carrier and one or more customers of 
        such carrier. Such tariff shall include--
                    ``(A) the term of the contract, including any 
                renewal options;
                    ``(B) a brief description of each of the services 
                provided under the contract;
                    ``(C) minimum volume commitments for each service, 
                if any;
                    ``(D) the contract price for each service or 
                services at the volume levels committed to by the 
                customer or customers;
                    ``(E) a brief description of any volume discounts 
                built into the contract rate structure; and
                    ``(F) a general description of any other 
                classifications, practices, and regulations affecting 
                the contract rate.
            ``(3) Service area.--The term `service area' has the same 
        meaning as in section 214(e)(5).

``SEC. 287. SAVINGS PROVISIONS.

    ``(a) Commission Authority.--Nothing in this part shall be 
construed to restrict the authority of the Commission under sections 
201 through 208.
    ``(b) Rural Telephone Company Rights.--Nothing in this part shall 
be construed to diminish the rights of rural telephone companies 
otherwise accorded by this Act, or the rules, policies, procedures, 
guidelines, and standards of the Commission as of the date of enactment 
of this section.
    ``(c) State Authority.--Nothing in this part shall be construed to 
limit or affect any authority (as of August 1, 2001) of the States over 
charges, classifications, practices, services, facilities, or 
regulations for or in connection with intrastate communications service 
by wire or radio of any carrier.''.

SEC. 5. LIMITATION ON MERGER REVIEW.

    (a) Amendment.--Section 310 of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 
U.S.C. 310) is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(f) Deadline for Making Public Interest Determination.--
            ``(1) Time limit.--In connection with any merger between 
        two percent carriers, or the acquisition, directly or 
        indirectly, by a two percent carrier or its affiliate of 
        securities or assets of another carrier or its affiliate, if 
the merged or acquiring carrier remains a two percent carrier after the 
merger or acquisition, the Commission shall make any determinations 
required by this section and section 214, and shall rule on any 
petition for waiver of the Commission's rules or other request related 
to such determinations, not later than 60 days after the date an 
application with respect to such merger or acquisition is submitted to 
the Commission.
            ``(2) Approval absent action.--If the Commission does not 
        approve or deny an application as described in paragraph (1) by 
        the end of the period specified, the application shall be 
        deemed approved on the day after the end of such period. Any 
        such application deemed approved under this subsection shall be 
        deemed approved without conditions.
            ``(3) Election permitted.--The Commission shall permit a 
        two percent carrier to make an election pursuant to section 284 
        with respect to any local exchange facilities acquired as a 
        result of a merger or acquisition that is subject to the review 
        deadline established in paragraph (1) of this subsection.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The provisions of this section shall apply 
with respect to any application that is submitted to the Commission on 
or after the date of enactment of this Act. Applications pending with 
the Commission on the date of enactment of this Act shall be subject to 
the requirements of this section as if they had been filed with the 
Commission on the date of enactment of this Act.

SEC. 6. TIME LIMITS FOR ACTION ON PETITIONS FOR RECONSIDERATION OR 
              WAIVER.

    (a) Amendment.--Section 405 of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 
U.S.C. 405) is amended by adding to the end the following:
    ``(c) Expedited Action Required.--
            ``(1) Time limit.--Within 90 days after receiving from a 
        two percent carrier a petition for reconsideration or other 
        review filed under this section or a petition for waiver of a 
        rule, policy, or other Commission requirement, the Commission 
        shall issue an order granting or denying such petition. If the 
        Commission fails to act on a petition for waiver subject to the 
        requirements of this section within this 90-day period, the 
        relief sought in such petition shall be deemed granted. If the 
        Commission fails to act on a petition for reconsideration or 
        other review subject to the requirements of this section within 
        such 90-day period, the Commission's enforcement of any rule 
        the reconsideration or other review of which was specifically 
        sought by the petitioning party shall be stayed with respect to 
        that party until the Commission issues an order granting or 
        denying such petition.
            ``(2) Finality of action.--Any order issued under paragraph 
        (1), or any grant of a petition for waiver that is deemed to 
        occur as a result of the Commission's failure to act under 
        paragraph (1), shall be a final order and may be appealed.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The provisions of this section shall apply 
with respect to any petition for reconsideration or other review or 
petition for waiver that is submitted to the Commission on or after the 
date of enactment of this Act. Petitions for reconsideration or 
petitions for waiver pending with the Commission on the date of 
enactment of this Act shall be subject to the requirements of this 
section as if they had been filed on the date of enactment of this Act.

SEC. 7. NATIONAL SECURITY AND LAW ENFORCEMENT EXCEPTIONS.

    Notwithstanding sections 310 and 405 of the Communications Act of 
1934 (47 U.S.C. 310 and 405), the 60-day time period under section 
310(f)(1) of that Act, as added by section 5 of this Act, and the 90-
day time period under section 405(c)(1) of that Act, as added by 
section 6 of this Act, shall not apply to a petition or application 
under section 310 or 405 if an Executive Branch agency with cognizance 
over national security, law enforcement, or public safety matters, 
including the Department of Defense, Department of Justice, and the 
Federal Bureau of Investigation, submits a written filing to the 
Federal Communications Commission advising the Commission that the 
petition or application may present national security, law enforcement, 
or public safety concerns that may not be resolved within the 60-day or 
90-day time period, respectively.
Example Output: Facilitating Access to Speedy Transmissions for Networks, E-commerce and Telecommunications (FASTNET) Act - Amends the Communications Act of 1934 to define a "two percent carrier" (carrier) as an incumbent local exchange carrier whose access lines, when combined with the access lines of any other carrier that such carrier controls, are fewer than two percent of the subscriber lines installed in the aggregate nationwide.Directs the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), in adopting rules that apply to such carriers, to separately evaluate the burden that any proposed regulatory, compliance, or reporting requirements would have on such carriers. Prohibits the FCC from requiring such carriers to: (1) file cost allocation manuals or Automated Reporting and Management Information Systems reports; or (2) establish or maintain a separate affiliate to provide any common carrier or noncommon carrier services.Limits carrier participation in tariff pools and price cap regulation.Requires the FCC to permit such carriers to introduce new interstate telecommunications services by filing a tariff on one day's notice.Allows such carriers to de-average its interstate switched or special access rates, file tariffs on one day's notice, and file contract-based tariffs for switched or special access services upon certifying that a telecommunications carrier unaffiliated with such carrier is engaged in facilities-based entry within such carrier's service area. Limits FCC carrier merger review authority. Provides time limits for FCC action on petitions for reconsideration or waiver of a rule, policy, or requirement.

Example Input: SECTION 1. MODIFICATIONS AND INCREASED VOLUME CAP WITH RESPECT TO 
              QUALIFIED MORTGAGE BONDS.

    (a) Use of Qualified Mortgage Bonds Proceeds for Subprime 
Refinancing Loans.--Section 143(k) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 
(relating to other definitions and special rules) is amended by adding 
at the end the following new paragraph:
            ``(12) Special rules for subprime refinancings.--
                    ``(A) In general.--In the case of a residence which 
                was originally financed by the mortgagor through a 
                qualified subprime loan, this section shall be applied 
                with the following modifications:
                            ``(i) Subsection (i)(1) (relating to 
                        mortgages must be new mortgages) shall not 
                        apply.
                            ``(ii) Subsection (a)(2)(D)(i) shall be 
                        applied by substituting `12-month period' for 
                        `42-month period' each place it appears.
                            ``(iii) Subsection (d) (relating to 3-year 
                        requirement) shall not apply.
                            ``(iv) Subsection (e) (relating to purchase 
                        price requirement) shall be applied by using 
                        the market value of the residence at the time 
                        of refinancing in lieu of the acquisition cost.
                    ``(B) Qualified subprime loan.--
                            ``(i) In general.--The term `qualified 
                        subprime loan' means an adjustable rate single-
                        family residential mortgage loan originated 
                        after December 31, 2001, and before January 1, 
                        2008, that the bond issuer determines has 
                        characteristics that suggest both a reasonably 
                        foreseeable risk of default and a reasonable 
                        potential to avoid default with the benefit of 
                        a lower cost refinancing.
                            ``(ii) Considerations.--In making the 
                        determination under clause (i), the bond issuer 
                        may consider the following characteristics:
                                    ``(I) Loan payments which are 
                                scheduled to increase by more than 10 
                                percent after December 31, 2007, and 
                                before January 1, 2011.
                                    ``(II) A loan-to-value ratio of 97 
                                percent or greater at the time of the 
                                original mortgage loan or at the time 
                                of the refinancing of such loan after 
                                adjustment for any decline in the fair 
                                market value of the residence.
                                    ``(III) A borrower whose 
                                creditworthiness is relatively low in 
                                comparison to a prime borrower, based 
                                on a lower credit score, such as a Fair 
                                Isaac Credit Organization credit score 
                                at the time of the original subprime 
                                loan of less than 660 and the absence 
                                of an increase in such score by more 
                                than 10 percent since the time of the 
                                original loan.
                                    ``(IV) Whether loan payments on the 
                                original mortgage loan generally have 
                                been made in a current, timely manner, 
                                subject only to isolated late payments.
                    ``(C) Termination.--This paragraph shall not apply 
                to any bonds issued after December 31, 2010.''.
    (b) Increased Volume Cap for Qualified Mortgage Bonds.--
            (1) In general.--Subsection (d) of section 146 of the 
        Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the end 
        the following new paragraph:
            ``(5) Increase and set aside for qualified mortgage bonds 
        for 2008.--
                    ``(A) In general.--The State ceiling for calendar 
                year 2008 shall be increased by $15,000,000,000.
                    ``(B) Set aside.--
                            ``(i) In general.--Not less than an amount 
                        equal to each State's allocable share of the 
                        increase in the State ceiling under 
                        subparagraph (A) shall be allocated solely for 
                        the purpose of a qualified mortgage issue which 
                        meets the requirement clause (ii).
                            ``(ii) Requirement.--A qualified mortgage 
                        issue meets the requirement of this clause if 
                        such issue meets the requirement of section 
                        143(a)(2)(D)(i) (determined by substituting 
                        `12-month period' for `42-month period' each 
                        place it appears).''.
            (2) Carryforward of unused limitations.--Subsection (f) of 
        section 146 of such Code is amended by adding at the end the 
        following new paragraph:
            ``(6) Special rules for increased volume cap under 
        subsection (d)(5).--No amount which is attributable to the 
        increase under subsection (d)(5) may be used--
                    ``(A) for a carryforward purpose other than issuing 
                qualified mortgage bonds, and
                    ``(B) to issue any bond after calendar year 
                2010.''.
    (c) Alternative Minimum Tax.--
            (1) In general.--Clause (ii) of section 57(a)(5)(C) of the 
        Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking ``shall 
        not include'' and all that follows and inserting ``shall not 
        include--
                                    ``(I) any qualified 501(c)(3) bond 
                                (as defined in section 145), or
                                    ``(II) any qualified mortgage bond 
                                (as defined in section 143(a)) or 
                                qualified veterans' mortgage bond (as 
                                defined in section 143(b)) issued after 
                                December 31, 2007, and before January 
                                1, 2011.''.
            (2) Conforming amendment.--The heading for section 
        57(a)(5)(C)(ii) is amended by striking ``qualified 501(c)(3) 
        bonds'' and inserting ``certain bonds''.
    (d) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to bonds issued after December 31, 2007.
Example Output: Amends the Internal Revenue Code to: (1) allow proceeds of qualified mortgage bonds to be used to refinance certain residential subprime loans issued between 2002 and 2008; (2) increase in 2008 limitations on issuance amounts for qualified mortgage bonds; and (3) exempt tax-exempt interest on qualified mortgage or veterans' mortgage bonds issued before 2011 from the alternative minimum tax.

Example Input: TITLE I--MOTOR VEHICLE INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE

SEC. 101. FINDINGS AND PURPOSE.

    (a) Findings.--Congress finds that, in carrying out title I of the 
Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.), the Administrator of the 
Environmental Protection Agency (referred to in this Act as the 
``Administrator'') has failed to--
            (1) adequately consider alternative programs to centralized 
        vehicle emission testing programs, as required by section 
        182(c)(3)(C)(vi) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 7511a(c)(3)(C)(vi)); 
        and
            (2) provide adequate credit to States for the alternative 
        programs.
    (b) Purpose.--The purpose of this title is to require the 
Administrator to--
            (1) reassess the determinations of the Administrator with 
        respect to the equivalency of centralized and decentralized 
        programs under section 182(c)(3)(C)(vi) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 
        7511a(c)(3)(C)(vi)); and
            (2) issue new regulations governing the programs that--
                    (A) result in minimum disruption to the ability of 
                States to comply with other requirements of such Act 
                (42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.); and
                    (B) provide States a reasonable opportunity to 
                comply with the new regulations and implement 
                decentralized testing programs.

SEC. 102. IMPLEMENTATION OF ENHANCED VEHICLE INSPECTION PROGRAMS.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, a 
State shall not be required to implement an enhanced vehicle inspection 
and maintenance program under section 182(c)(3)(42 U.S.C. 7511a(c)(3)) 
or section 184 (42 U.S.C. 7511c) of the Clean Air Act before the date 2 
years after the date of the enactment of this Act.
    (b) Reassessment of Regulations.--
            (1) In general.--The Administrator shall--
                    (A) immediately rescind the regulations issued on 
                November 5, 1992 (57 Fed. Reg. 52950), relating to 
                operation of the program described in subsection (a) on 
                a centralized basis; and
                    (B) during the period beginning on the date of 
                enactment of this Act and ending 2 years thereafter--
                            (i) reassess the determinations made by the 
                        Administrator with respect to operation of the 
                        program described in subsection (a) on a 
                        centralized basis, taking into consideration 
                        comments submitted by States; and
                            (ii) issue new regulations relating to 
                        operation of the program described in 
                        subsection (a) on a centralized basis.
            (2) Requirements.--The regulations issued under paragraph 
        (1)(B)(ii) shall--
                    (A) in accordance with the intent of section 
                182(c)(3)(C)(vi) of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 
                7511a(c)(3)(C)(vi)) and section 184 of that Act (42 
                U.S.C. 7511c)--
                            (i) make reasonably available to States the 
                        option of operation of the program described in 
                        subsection (a) on a decentralized basis; and
                            (ii) establish criteria that a State must 
                        meet in order to demonstrate that a 
                        decentralized program of the State is equally 
                        effective as a centralized program; and
                    (B)(i) provide each State a reasonable opportunity 
                to submit (at the option of the State) a new revision 
                to a plan under section 182(c)(3) (42 U.S.C. 
                7511a(c)(3)) or 184 (42 U.S.C. 7511c) of such Act based 
                on the new regulations, which revision shall replace 
                any revision to a plan previously submitted by the 
                State under section 182(c)(3) or 184 of such Act; and
                    (ii) include a schedule that provides States a 
                reasonable opportunity to implement any new revisions 
                to plans that they submit.
            (3) Judicial review.--Notwithstanding section 706 of title 
        5, United States Code, or any other provision of law, if the 
        regulations issued pursuant to paragraph (1)(B)(ii) are 
        reviewed by a court, the court shall hold unlawful and set 
        aside the regulations if the regulations are found to be 
        unsupported by a preponderance of the evidence.
    (c) Prohibition on Imposition of Sanctions.--Until such time as the 
Administrator has carried out subsection (b)(1)--
            (1) the Administrator may not issue a finding, disapproval, 
        or determination under section 179(a) of the Clean Air Act (42 
        U.S.C. 7509(a)), or apply a sanction specified in section 
        179(b) of such Act, to a State with respect to a failure to 
        implement a program described in subsection (a), or any portion 
        of such a program; and
            (2) the Administrator and the Administrator of the Federal 
        Highway Administration of the Department of Transportation may 
        not take any adverse action, against a State with respect to a 
        failure described in paragraph (1), under
                    (A) section 176 of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 
                7506);
                    (B) chapter 53 of title 49, United States Code;
                    (C) subpart T of part 51, or subpart A of part 93, 
                of title 40, Code of Federal Regulations (commonly 
                known as the ``transportation conformity rule''); or
                    (D) part 6, 51, or 93 of title 40, Code of Federal 
                Regulations (commonly known as the ``general conformity 
                rule'').
    (d) Full Credit for Decentralized Programs.--Until such time as the 
Administrator has carried out subsection (b)(1), for the purpose of the 
attainment demonstration and the reasonable further progress 
demonstration required under section 182(c)(2) of the Clean Air Act (42 
U.S.C. 7511a(c)(2)), the Administrator shall consider the operation of 
the program described in subsection (a) on a decentralized basis as 
equivalent to the operation of the program on a centralized basis in 
any case in which a State demonstrates that a determination of such an 
equivalency is reasonable.
    (e) Vehicle Inspection and Maintenance in Ozone Transport 
Regions.--Section 184(b)(1)(A) of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 
7511c(b)(1)(A)) is amended by striking ``182(c)(2)(A)(pertaining to 
enhanced vehicle inspection and maintenance programs)'' and inserting 
``182(b)(4)(relating to motor vehicle inspection and maintenance) or, 
in the case of an area classified as serious, severe, or extreme, 
section 182(c)(3)(A)(relating to enhanced vehicle inspection and 
maintenance programs)''.

              TITLE II--REDESIGNATION OF ATTAINMENT AREAS

SEC. 201. FINDINGS.

    The Congress finds that--
            (1) The year 1988 was a climatological anomaly, with data 
        collection revealing unparalleled, frequent, and high 
        temperatures.
            (2) The frequency and persistence of high temperature days 
        are the most significant factors in causing ambient ozone air 
        pollution episodes.
            (3) The number of ambient ozone air pollution exceedance 
        days on a national average (excluding the State of California) 
        was 607 days in 1988, compared to 104 days in 1993, and 93 days 
        in 1994.
            (4) In a 3-year measurement of ozone which included 1988 
        data, the Environmental Protection Agency found 98 regions as 
        ozone nonattainment under the Clean Air Act.
            (5) In a 3-year average of ozone measurement excluding 1988 
        data, the Environmental Protection Agency found 41 of the 98 
        previously designated nonattainment regions registering ozone 
        attainment under the Clean Air Act for the consecutive years 
        1991, 1992, 1993.

SEC. 202. REDESIGNATION AS ATTAINMENT.

    Section 107(d)(3)(B) of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7407(d)(3)(B)) 
is amended by inserting ``(i)'' after ``(B)'', and adding the following 
new clause (ii) at the end thereof:
            ``(ii) Notwithstanding any other provision of this 
        paragraph, if the Governor submits a redesignation of an 
        appropriate area, or portion thereof, from nonattainment to 
        attainment, and such designation is based upon the attainment 
        of the relevant National Ambient Air Quality Standard for 3 
        consecutive years, such redesignation shall become effective 
        immediately upon receipt by the Administrator.''.
Example Output:
TABLE OF CONTENTS: 
     Title I:  Motor Vehicle Inspection and Maintenance 
     Title II:  Redesignation of Attainment Areas 
Title I:  Motor Vehicle Inspection and Maintenance
 - Provides that States shall not be required to implement enhanced vehicle inspection and maintenance programs under provisions of the Clean Air Act pertaining to Serious, Extreme, and Severe ozone nonattainment areas and ozone transport regions before two years after this Act's enactment date. 
Directs the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency to immediately rescind regulations relating to the operation of such programs on a centralized basis and issue new regulations to allow the operation of such programs on a centralized or decentralized basis at the option of each State. 
Prohibits, until the Administrator carries out such requirements, the imposition of sanctions for failures by States to implement such programs or specified adverse actions against States by the Administrator or the Administrator of the Federal Highway Administration. 
Requires the Administrator to consider the operation of programs on a decentralized basis as equivalent to operation on a centralized basis if the State demonstrates that such equivalency is reasonable. 
Title II:  Redesignation of Attainment Areas
 - Amends the Clean Air Act to provide that if a State Governor submits a redesignation of an area from nonattainment to attainment and such designation is based upon attainment of the relevant national ambient air quality standard for three consecutive years, such redesignation shall become effective immediately upon receipt by the Administrator.