In this task, you are given text for US Congressional and California state bills, your task is to generate a summary for this bill.

Example Input: SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Safer Officers and Safer Citizens 
Act of 2017''.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

    Congress finds the following:
            (1) While police body worn cameras are not a panacea, they 
        do contribute to keeping both law enforcement officers and 
        citizens safer.
            (2) Increasing the use of body worn cameras by law 
        enforcement officers has been shown by multiple studies to 
        significantly reduce the number of use of force incidents and 
        the number of citizen complaints.
            (3) Increased accountability and transparency in policing 
        activities will benefit all our citizens, including our law 
        enforcement officers.

SEC. 3. GRANT PROGRAM.

    Title I of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 
(42 U.S.C. 3711 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the following:

  ``PART MM--GRANT PROGRAM FOR BODY WORN CAMERAS FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT 
                                OFFICERS

``SEC. 3031. PROGRAM AUTHORIZED.

    ``(a) In General.--The Director of the Bureau of Justice Assistance 
is authorized to make grants to States, units of local government, and 
Indian tribes to purchase body worn cameras for use by State, local, 
and tribal law enforcement officers.
    ``(b) Uses of Funds.--Grants awarded under this section shall be--
            ``(1) distributed directly to the State, unit of local 
        government, or Indian tribe; and
            ``(2) used for the purchase of--
                    ``(A) body worn cameras for law enforcement 
                officers; and
                    ``(B) necessary initial supportive technological 
                infrastructure for body worn cameras for law 
                enforcement officers in the jurisdiction of the 
                grantee.
    ``(c) Preferential Consideration.--In awarding grants under this 
part, the Director of the Bureau of Justice Assistance shall give 
preferential consideration, if feasible, to an application from a 
jurisdiction that--
            ``(1) has in place a comprehensive policy that is--
                    ``(A) developed in consultation with a broad group 
                of criminal justice experts and community members, and 
                that contains policies and procedures addressing 
                deployment, video capture, privacy protections, 
                viewing, use, release, storage, retention, the effect 
                on community-police interactions, and audits and 
                controls;
                    ``(B) supported by a comprehensive communication 
                and education campaign that involves interested parties 
                in law enforcement, courts, prosecution, the defense 
                bar, civic leadership, labor organizations, victim and 
                juvenile advocacy, the media, and the public; and
                    ``(C) informed by the best practices on body worn 
                cameras developed by the Department of Justice;
            ``(2) has the greatest need for body worn cameras based on 
        the percentage of law enforcement officers in the department 
        who do not have access to a body worn camera;
            ``(3) has a violent crime rate at or above the national 
        average as determined by the Bureau of Justice Statistics; and
            ``(4) commits to submitting such metrics on the usage of 
        body worn cameras, in such a format and at such a time as the 
        Department of Justice shall reasonably specify, for the 
        purposes of collecting and studying data on the effectiveness 
        of body worn cameras to increase safety for both law 
        enforcement officers and citizens.
    ``(d) Matching Funds.--The portion of the costs of a program 
provided by a grant under subsection (a) may not exceed 75 percent. Any 
funds appropriated by Congress for the activities of any agency of an 
Indian tribal government or the Bureau of Indian Affairs performing law 
enforcement functions on any Indian lands may be used to provide the 
non-Federal share of a matching requirement funded under this 
subsection.

``SEC. 3032. APPLICATIONS.

    ``(a) In General.--To request a grant under this part, the chief 
executive of a State, unit of local government, or Indian tribe shall 
submit an application to the Director of the Bureau of Justice 
Assistance in such form and containing such information as the Director 
may reasonably require.
    ``(b) Regulations.--Not later than 90 days after the date of the 
enactment of this part, the Director of the Bureau of Justice 
Assistance shall promulgate regulations to implement this section, 
including the information that must be included and the requirements 
that the States, units of local government, and Indian tribes must meet 
in submitting the applications required under this section.

``SEC. 3033. DEFINITIONS.

    ``For purposes of this part--
            ``(1) the term `Indian tribe' has the same meaning as in 
        section 4(e) of the Indian Self-Determination and Education 
        Assistance Act (25 U.S.C. 450b(e));
            ``(2) the term `law enforcement officer' means any officer, 
        agent, or employee of a State, unit of local government, or 
        Indian tribe authorized by law or by a government agency to 
        engage in or supervise the prevention, detection, or 
        investigation of any violation of criminal law, or authorized 
        by law to supervise sentenced criminal offenders;
            ``(3) the term `State' means each of the 50 States, the 
        District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the 
        United States Virgin Islands, American Samoa, Guam, and the 
        Northern Mariana Islands; and
            ``(4) the term `unit of local government' means a county, 
        municipality, town, township, village, parish, borough, or 
        other unit of general government below the State level.

``SEC. 3034. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

    ``(a) In General.--There are authorized to be appropriated to carry 
out this part, $100,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2018 through 2022.
    ``(b) Remaining Funds.--Any amounts made available to carry out 
this part that are unobligated at the end of each fiscal year, shall be 
returned to the general fund of the Treasury for debt reduction.''.

SEC. 4. OFFSET.

    (a) Findings.--Congress finds the following:
            (1) In 2010, the most current year for which figures are 
        available, the Federal Government spent $1,670,000,000 
        operating and maintaining unutilized and underutilized 
        buildings.
            (2) Federal agencies have consistently indicated that the 
        disposal efforts of the agencies are often hampered by 
        statutory requirements.
    (b) Offset.--Notwithstanding subtitle I of title 40, United States 
Code, or any other provision of law, the Administrator of General 
Services, in consultation with the Director of the Office of Management 
and Budget, may immediately identify and dispose of, through sale at 
fair market value or demolition if unsuitable for sale, the most 
financially burdensome excess Federal property, so as to generate not 
more than $500,000,000 in savings by the end of fiscal year 2022.
Example Output: Safer Officers and Safer Citizens Act of 2017 This bill amends the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 to authorize the Department of Justice's Bureau of Justice Assistance to award matching grants to states, local governments, and Indian tribes to purchase body-worn cameras.  The Bureau of Justice Assistance must give preference to grant applications from jurisdictions that: (1) have comprehensive policies and procedures related to implementation of a body-worn camera program, (2) have high percentages of officers without access to body-worn cameras, (3) have violent crime rates above the national average, and (4) agree to submit metrics on the use of body-worn cameras.  As an offset, the bill allows the General Services Administration to identify and dispose of (i.e., sell or demolish) excess federal property. 

Example Input: SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Interstate Transportation of 
Municipal Waste Act of 1993''.

SEC. 2. INTERSTATE TRANSPORTATION OF MUNICIPAL WASTE.

    Subtitle D of the Solid Waste Disposal Act (42 U.S.C. 6941 et seq.) 
is amended by adding at the end the following new section:

             ``interstate transportation of municipal waste

    ``Sec. 4011. (a) Authority To Restrict Out-of-State Municipal Waste 
Imports.--
            ``(1) Authority to prohibit.--(A) Except as provided in 
        subparagraph (B), a Governor may prohibit the disposal of out-
        of-State municipal waste in any landfill or incinerator that is 
        subject to the jurisdiction of the Governor.
            ``(B) The authority to prohibit disposal of out-of-State 
        municipal waste shall not apply to--
                    ``(i) landfills in operation on the date of 
                enactment of this section that--
                            ``(I) received during calendar year 1991 
                        documented shipments of out-of-State municipal 
                        waste; and
                            ``(II) are in compliance with all 
                        applicable Federal and State laws (including 
                        any Federal or State rule or regulation) 
                        relating to design and location standards, 
                        leachate collection, ground water monitoring, 
                        and financial assurance for closure and post-
                        closure and corrective action;
                    ``(ii) proposed landfills that, prior to January 1, 
                1993, received--
                            ``(I) an approval from either the affected 
                        local government or the local solid waste 
                        planning unit to receive municipal waste 
                        generated outside the jurisdiction of the 
                        affected local government, the solid waste 
                        planning unit, or the State in which the 
                        landfill is located; and
                            ``(II) a notice of decision from the State 
                        to grant a construction permit; or
                    ``(iii) incinerators in operation on the date of 
                enactment of this section that--
                            ``(I) received, during calendar year 1991, 
                        documented shipments of out-of-State municipal 
                        waste;
                            ``(II) are in compliance with the 
                        applicable requirements of section 129 of the 
                        Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7429); and
                            ``(III) are in compliance with all 
                        applicable Federal and State laws (including 
                        any Federal or State rule or regulation) 
                        relating to facility design, operations, and 
                        emissions.
            ``(2) Authority to limit.--Beginning with calendar year 
        1993, a Governor may--
                    ``(A) limit the quantity of out-of-State municipal 
                waste received for disposal at each landfill or 
                incinerator in the State to an annual quantity equal to 
                the quantity of out-of-State municipal waste received 
                for disposal at the landfill or incinerator during the 
                calendar year 1991 or 1992, whichever is less; and
                    ``(B) limit the disposal of out-of-State municipal 
                waste at each landfill or incinerator in the State that 
                received, during calendar year 1991 or 1992, documented 
                shipments of more than 50,000 tons of out-of-State 
                municipal waste representing more than 30 percent of 
                all municipal waste received at the landfill or 
                incinerator during the calendar year, by limiting the 
                quantity of out-of-State municipal waste received for 
                disposal at such landfill or incinerator to an annual 
                quantity not greater than 30 percent of all municipal 
                waste received at the landfill or incinerator during 
                calendar year 1991 or 1992, whichever is less;
                    ``(C) prohibit the disposal of out-of-State 
                municipal waste in landfills that do not meet all 
                applicable Federal and State laws (including any 
                Federal or State rule or regulation) relating to design 
                and location standards, leachate collection, ground 
                water monitoring, and financial assurance for closure 
                and post-closure and corrective action; and
                    ``(D) prohibit the disposal of out-of-State 
                municipal waste in incinerators that do not meet all 
                applicable Federal and State laws (including any 
                Federal or State rule or regulation) relating to 
                facility design, operations, and emissions.
            ``(3) Authority to further limit.--Beginning with calendar 
        year 1997, a Governor may further limit the disposal of out-of-
        State municipal waste as provided in paragraph (2)(B) by 
        reducing the 30 percent annual quantity limitation to 20 
        percent in each of calendar years 1998 and 1999, and to 10 
        percent in each succeeding calendar year.
            ``(4) Authority with respect to industrial waste.--A 
        Governor may exercise the authority provided in paragraphs (1), 
        (2), and (3) with respect to any industrial waste that is to be 
        disposed of at a landfill or incinerator that receives 
        municipal solid waste.
            ``(5) Applicability and discrimination provisions.--Any 
        limitation imposed by the Governor under paragraph (2)(A), 
        paragraph (2)(B), or paragraph (3)--
                    ``(A) shall be applicable throughout the State; and
                    ``(B) shall not discriminate against any shipments 
                of out-of-State municipal waste on the basis of State 
                of origin.
            ``(6) Determination of quantity of out-of-state municipal 
        waste received in states exercising authority.--(A) Any 
        Governor who intends to exercise the authority provided in this 
        subsection shall, within 120 days after the date of enactment 
        of this section, submit to the Administrator information 
        documenting the quantity of out-of-State municipal waste 
        received for disposal in the State of the Governor during 
        calendar years 1991 and 1992.
            ``(B) On receipt of the information submitted pursuant to 
        subparagraph (A), the Administrator shall notify the Governor 
        of each State and the public and shall provide a comment period 
        of not less than 30 days.
            ``(C) Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment 
        of this section, the Administrator shall publish a list of the 
        quantity of out-of-State municipal waste that was received 
        during calendar years 1991 and 1992, at each landfill and 
        incinerator in each State in which the Governor intends to 
        exercise the authority provided in this subsection.
    ``(b) Authority To Restrict In-State Municipal Waste Exports.--(1) 
Except as provided in paragraph (2), a Governor of a State may limit or 
prohibit the exportation outside the State of municipal waste generated 
in the State, in accordance with the comprehensive waste management 
plan of the affected local solid waste planning unit, or, if such a 
plan does not exist, in accordance with State law.
    ``(2) A Governor may not limit or prohibit the exportation of 
materials consisting solely of materials that have been separated from 
municipal waste for recycling.
    ``(c) Delegation of Authority to Local Governments.--A Governor may 
delegate authority provided by subsection (a) or (b), or both, to an 
affected local government or to a local solid waste planning unit, if a 
local solid waste planning unit exists under State law.
    ``(d) Designation of Affected Local Government.--Within 90 days 
after the date of the enactment of this section, the Governor shall 
designate which entity listed in subsection (e)(1) shall serve as the 
affected local government for actions taken under subsections (a) and 
(b). If the Governor fails to make a designation, the affected local 
government for actions taken under this section shall be the city, 
town, borough, county, parish, or other political subdivision created 
pursuant to State law with primary jurisdiction over the land or the 
use of the land on which the landfill or incinerator concerned is 
located.
    ``(e) Definitions.--For purposes of this section:
            ``(1) The term `affected local government' means the 
        elected officials of the city, town, borough, county, parish, 
        or other political subdivision in which a landfill or 
        incinerator is located.
            ``(2) The term `affected local solid waste planning unit' 
        means a political subdivision of a State with authority 
        relating to solid waste management planning in accordance with 
        State law.
            ``(3) The term `out-of-State municipal waste' means, with 
        respect to a State, municipal waste generated outside of the 
        State. The term includes municipal waste generated outside of 
        the United States.
            ``(4) The term `municipal waste' means refuse (and refuse-
        derived fuel) generated by the general public or from a 
        residential, commercial, institutional, or industrial source 
        (or any combination thereof), consisting of paper, wood, yard 
        wastes, plastics, leather, rubber, or other combustible or 
        noncombustible materials such as metal or glass (or any 
        combination thereof). The term does not include--
                    ``(A) any solid waste identified or listed as a 
                hazardous waste under section 3001;
                    ``(B) any solid waste, including contaminated soil 
                and debris, resulting from a response action taken 
                under section 104 or 106 of the Comprehensive 
                Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act 
                (42 U.S.C. 9604 or 9606) or a corrective action taken 
                under this Act;
                    ``(C) any metal, pipe, glass, plastic, paper, 
                textile, or other material that has been separated or 
                diverted from municipal waste and has been transported 
                into the State for the purpose of recycling or 
                reclamation;
                    ``(D) any solid or industrial waste that is--
                            ``(i) generated by an industrial facility; 
                        and
                            ``(ii) transported for the purpose of 
                        treatment, storage, or disposal to a facility 
                        that is owned or operated by the generator of 
                        the waste, or is located on property owned by 
                        the generator of a company with which the 
                        generator is affiliated;
                    ``(E) any solid waste generated incident to the 
                provision of service in interstate, intrastate, 
                foreign, or overseas air transportation;
                    ``(F) any medical waste that is segregated from or 
                not mixed with municipal waste; or
                    ``(G) any material or product returned from a 
                dispenser or distributor to the manufacturer for 
                credit, evaluation, or possible reuse.
            ``(5) The term `industrial waste' means waste generated 
        from manufacturing or industrial processing operations that is 
        not identical to municipal waste with respect to the physical 
        and chemical state of the waste and the composition of the 
        waste. The term includes construction and demolition debris.''.

SEC. 3. TABLE OF CONTENTS AMENDMENT.

    The table of contents of the Solid Waste Disposal Act is amended by 
adding at the end of the items relating to subtitle D the following new 
item:

``Sec. 4011. Interstate transportation of municipal waste.''.
Example Output: Interstate Transportation of Municipal Waste Act of 1993 - Amends the Solid Waste Disposal Act to authorize a State Governor to prohibit the disposal of out-of-State municipal waste in any landfill or incinerator in the State. 
Exempts from a Governor's authority to prohibit the disposal of out-of-State waste:  (1) landfills that received documented shipments of such waste in 1991 and are in compliance with Federal and State laws relating to design and location standards, leachate collection, groundwater monitoring, and financial assurance for closure and post-closure and corrective action; (2) proposed landfills that, prior to January 1, 1993, received an approval from the affected local government or solid waste planning unit to receive municipal waste generated outside the jurisdiction of the local government, planning unit, or State and a State notice of decision to grant a construction permit; or (3) incinerators that received documented shipments of such waste during 1991 and are in compliance with performance standards under the Clean Air Act and Federal and State laws relating to facility design, operations, and emissions. 
Authorizes State Governors, beginning in 1993, to further limit the quantity of out-of-State waste received for disposal, or the disposal of such waste, at specified landfills and incinerators.  Applies the authorities of this Act to industrial waste to be disposed of at landfills or incinerators that receive municipal solid waste. 
Prohibits discrimination against shipments of out-of-State waste on the basis of State of origin. 
Authorizes a State Governor to limit or prohibit the exportation outside the State of municipal waste generated within the State.

Example Input: SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Let Parents Raise Their Kids Act of 
2004''.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

    The Congress finds as follows:
            (1) The United States Preventive Services Task Force 
        (USPSTF) issued findings and recommendation against screening 
        for suicide that corroborate those of the Canadian Preventive 
        Services Task Force. ``USPSTF found no evidence that screening 
        for suicide risk reduces suicide attempts or mortality. There 
        is limited evidence on the accuracy of screening tools to 
        identify suicide risk in the primary care setting, including 
        tools to identify those at high risk.''.
            (2) The 1999 Surgeon General's report on mental health 
        admitted the serious conflicts in the medical literature 
        regarding the definitions of mental health and mental illness 
        when it said, ``In other words, what it means to be mentally 
        healthy is subject to many different interpretations that are 
        rooted in value judgments that may vary across cultures. The 
        challenge of defining mental health has stalled the development 
        of programs to foster mental health (Secker, 1998). . . .''.
            (3) The Surgeon General's report also says, ``The diagnosis 
        of mental disorders is often believed to be more difficult than 
        diagnosis of somatic or general medical disorders since there 
        is no definitive laboratory test or abnormality in brain tissue 
        that can identify the illness.''.
            (4) Accurate mental health diagnosis of children is 
        difficult as admitted by the Surgeon General's report that 
        says, ``The science is challenging because of the ongoing 
        process of development. The normally developing child hardly 
        stays the same long enough to make stable measurements. Adult 
        criteria for illness can be difficult to apply to children and 
        adolescents, when the signs and symptoms of mental disorders 
        are often also the characteristics of normal development.''.
            (5) Authors of the bible of psychiatric diagnosis, the 
        Diagnostic and Statistical Manual, admit that the diagnostic 
        criteria for mental illness are vague, saying, ``DSM-IV 
        criteria remain a consensus without clear empirical data 
        supporting the number of items required for the diagnosis. . . 
        . Furthermore, the behavioral characteristics specified in DSM-
        IV, despite efforts to standardize them, remain subjective. . . 
        .'' (American Psychiatric Association Committee on the 
        Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM-IV 1994), pp. 1162-
        1163).
            (6) Because of the subjectivity of psychiatric diagnosis, 
        it is all too easy for a psychiatrist to label a person's 
        disagreement with the psychiatrist's political beliefs a mental 
        disorder.
            (7) At least one federally-funded school violence 
        prevention program has suggested that a child who shares his or 
        her parent's traditional values may be likely to instigate 
        school violence.
            (8) Despite many statements in the popular press and by 
        groups promoting the psychiatric labeling and medication of 
        children, that ADD/ADHD is due to a chemical imbalance in the 
        brain, the 1998 National Institutes of Health Consensus 
        Conference said, ``. . . further research is necessary to 
        firmly establish ADHD as a brain disorder. This is not unique 
        to ADHD, but applies as well to most psychiatric disorders, 
        including disabling diseases such as schizophrenia. . . . 
        Although an independent diagnostic test for ADHD does not 
        exist. . . . Finally, after years of clinical research and 
        experience with ADHD, our knowledge about the cause or causes 
        of ADHD remains speculative.''.
            (9) There has been a precipitous increase in the 
        prescription rates of psychiatric drugs in children:
                    (A) A 300-percent increase in psychotropic drug use 
                in 2 to 4 year old children from 1991 to 1995 (Journal 
                of the American Medical Association, 2000).
                    (B) A 300-percent increase in psychotropic drug use 
                in children from 1987 to 1996 (Archives of Pediatric & 
                Adolescent Medicine, 2003).
                    (C) More money was spent on psychiatric drugs for 
                children than on antibiotics or asthma medication 
                (Medco Trends, 2004).
            (10) A September 2004 Food and Drug Administration hearing 
        found that more than two-thirds of studies of antidepressants 
        given to depressed children showed that they were no more 
        effective than placebo, or sugar pills, and that only the 
        positive trials were published by the pharmaceutical industry. 
        The lack of effectiveness of antidepressants has been known by 
        the Food and Drug Administration since at least 2000 when, 
        according to the Food and Drug Administration Background 
        Comments on Pediatric Depression, Robert Temple of the Food and 
        Drug Administration Office of Drug Evaluation acknowledged the 
        ``preponderance of negative studies of antidepressants in 
        pediatric populations''. The Surgeon General's report said of 
        stimulant medication like Ritalin, ``However, psychostimulants 
        do not appear to achieve long-term changes in outcomes such as 
        peer relationships, social or academic skills, or school 
        achievement.''.
            (11) The Food and Drug Administration finally acknowledged 
        in September 2004, that the newer antidepressants are related 
        to suicidal thoughts and actions in children and that this data 
        was hidden for years. The Food and Drug Administration had over 
        2000 reports of completed suicides from 1987 to 1995 for the 
        drug Prozac alone, which by the agency's own calculations 
        represent but a fraction of the suicides. Prozac is the only 
        such drug approved by the Food and Drug Administration for use 
        in children.
            (12) Other possible side effects of psychiatric medication 
        used in children include mania, violence, dependence, weight 
        gain, and insomnia from the newer antidepressants; cardiac 
        toxicity including lethal arrhythmias from the older 
        antidepressants; growth suppression, psychosis, and violence 
        from stimulants; and diabetes from the newer anti-psychotic 
        medications.
            (13) Parents are already being coerced to put their 
        children on psychiatric medications and some children are dying 
        because of it. Universal or mandatory mental health screening 
        and the accompanying treatments recommended by the President's 
        New Freedom Commission on Mental Health will only increase that 
        problem. Across the country, Patricia Weathers, the Carroll 
        Family, the Johnston Family, and the Salazar Family were all 
        charged or threatened with child abuse charges for refusing or 
        taking their children off of psychiatric medications.
            (14) The United States Supreme Court in Pierce versus 
        Society of Sisters (268 U.S. 510 (1925)) held that parents have 
        a right to direct the education and upbringing of their 
        children.
            (15) Universal or mandatory mental health screening 
        violates the right of parents to direct and control the 
        upbringing of their children.
            (16) Federal funds should never be used to support programs 
        that could lead to the increased over-medication of children, 
        the stigmatization of children and adults as mentally disturbed 
        based on their political or other beliefs, or the violation of 
        the liberty and privacy of Americans by subjecting them to 
        invasive ``mental health screening'' (the results of which are 
        placed in medical records which are available to government 
        officials and special interests without the patient's consent).

SEC. 3. PROHIBITION AGAINST FEDERAL FUNDING OF UNIVERSAL OR MANDATORY 
              MENTAL HEALTH SCREENING.

    (a) Universal or Mandatory Mental Health Screening Program.--No 
Federal funds may be used to establish or implement any universal or 
mandatory mental health screening program.
    (b) Refusal to Consent as Basis of a Charge of Child Abuse or 
Education Neglect.--No Federal education funds may be paid to any local 
educational agency or other instrument of government that uses the 
refusal of a parent or legal guardian to provide express, written, 
voluntary, informed consent to mental health screening for his or her 
child as the basis of a charge of child abuse or education neglect 
until the agency or instrument demonstrates that it is no longer using 
such refusal as a basis of a child abuse or education neglect charge.
    (c) Definition.--For purposes of this Act, the term ``universal or 
mandatory mental health screening program''--
            (1) means any mental health screening program in which a 
        set of individuals (other than members of the Armed Forces or 
        individuals serving a sentence resulting from conviction for a 
        criminal offense) is automatically screened without regard to 
        whether there was a prior indication of a need for mental 
        health treatment; and
            (2) includes--
                    (A) any program of State incentive grants for 
                transformation to implement recommendations in the July 
                2003 report of the President's New Freedom Commission 
                on Mental Health; and
                    (B) any student mental health screening program 
                that allows mental health screening of individuals 
                under 18 years of age without the express, written, 
                voluntary, informed consent of the parent or legal 
                guardian of the individual involved.
Example Output:
Let Parents Raise Their Kids Act of 2004 - Prohibits Federal funds from being used to establish or implement any universal or mandatory mental health screening program.

Prohibits Federal education funds from being used to pay any local educational agency or other instrument of government that uses the refusal of a parent or legal guardian to provide consent to mental health screening as the basis of a charge of child abuse or education neglect until the agency or instrument demonstrates that it is no longer using such refusal as a basis of such charge.

Defines universal or mandatory mental health screening as any mental health screening program in which a set of individuals is automatically screened without regard to whether there was a prior indication of a need for mental health treatment, including: (1) any program of State incentive grants to implement recommendations in the July 2003 report of the President's New Freedom Commission on Mental Health; and (2) any student mental health screening program that allows mental health screening of individuals under 18 years of age without the express, written, voluntary, informed consent of the parent or legal guardian of the individual involved.