In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: insult and non-insult. Insult is any lanugage or act that is disrespectful or scornfully abusive.

Example Input: Comment: No, Christian culture isn't producing acts of terrorism.

Islamic culture is.   And by excusing such violence as being somehow normal, something every culture does, you enable it to continue.
Example Output: Non-insult

Example Input: Comment: You suck, Bill Walker.
Example Output: Insult

Example Input: Comment: This is embarrassingly easy.

What evidence do the transgenders come forward with to make the claim that they are the other gender, or that they want HRT or gender "re-assignment" (the use of this term with rational people would by itself stop the discussion and start the laughter)?

What evidence?  

Self-reports.

Do they come in with genetic data?  Do they come in with any biological data?

No, they come in with self-reports, at best. 

Tell us, John, the fine details of "gender determination" without waving your arms and saying "it's complex" (and throwing in the word epigenetics that you learned last week), with of course the requisite concomitant arm waving.
Example Output:
Non-insult