TASK DEFINITION: We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.
PROBLEM: Sent1: What is the REASON behind "an eye for an eye" justice?
 Sent2: An eye for an eye won't make the whole world blind if the person never took the eye in the first place.

SOLUTION: Similar

PROBLEM: Sent1: The death penalty is not deterrance for the person executed.
 Sent2: Peterson could face the death penalty or life without parole.

SOLUTION: Not similar

PROBLEM: Sent1: And that killer has help, he has the people that support the death penalty and will give him more appeals, and if found guilty he'll get an easy way out with death, he won't have to suffer.
 Sent2: If we have a death penalty statute on the books, a person is convicted under that statute, his ONE appeal fails...he should die.

SOLUTION:
Not similar