We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Q: Sent1: If we don't stop the death penalty before we try to fix it, the imperfect system will continue to convict innocent people while we determine what is best for it.
 Sent2: The fact is that as long as we have a death penalty (the only Western nation to have it), we will execute innocents with the guilty.

A: Similar
****
Q: Sent1: By not giving the death penalty to a slaughtering murderer, we are telling the world that the life of this murderer is worth more than that of his victim.
 Sent2: Among other things, what does it say about us as a society if we kill people who not only reform there own lives, but the lives of many others?

A: Not similar
****
Q: Sent1: Especially given that you have accepted that some innocent people are executed.
 Sent2: You say that all people who commit gruesome murders are psychopaths.

A:
Not similar
****