The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the no-need strategy, otherwise output No. no-need is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used when a participant points out that they do not need an item based on personal context such as suggesting that they have ample water to spare. no-need can directly benefit the opponent since it implies that the item is up for grabs.

Context: 'Hi.  I can't do that right now.' 'Is there anything that you might need? ' 'I would be interested in firewood.  Can I ask you, what are your primary concerns on this trip?'
Utterance: 'My primary concerns are staying hydrated, I have been feeling sick and throwing up from being so high up in the mountains. '
No

Context: 'How nice. I am bringing my daughter and her girl scout troop. I am the co leader.' 'Oh that' 'We will need some extra water for all the girls on the hike.'
Utterance: 'Sorry, I sent my last message inadvertently. I meant to say that that sounds great! Yes, I can understand the need for extra water for the hike. With the size of my family, I could use a bit of extra food for our trip.'
No

Context: 'Ya so I could use a lot of water! Would you be willing for me to take one food two water and two firewood? ' 'Since we will have so much food to cook we could probably use the extra firewood too,would you be ok with me taking 2 food and 1 water and 2 firewood?🙂' 'No I'm giving you two of your top items I think it's only fair I get more items. '
Utterance: 'ok, that does make sense. I would agree to that. 🙂'

No