instruction:
Given a document, an entity and its sentiment towards the entity, verify if it is the correct sentiment towards the entity. Answer should be yes or no. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].
question:
Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Harry is Positive . Forget the Winter Olympics  the Champion's League or the Super Bowl. The real competition right now is who's going to be invited to  Prince Harry  and Meghan Markle's wedding.
British heavyweight boxer Anthony Joshua  who is seeking to add two more world championships to the three he already owns  says he would be happy to interrupt his high-level training for a trip to Windsor Castle on May 19. The ebullient Joshua has not been shy  tweeting a picture of himself and Harry with the question "Need a best man?"
Any bride and groom run into parental interference in their guest list  whether it's adding random cousins or forgotten neighbors. Yet  Harry  and Markle are enduring this phenomenon at a cosmic level due to the royal expectations that come along with being a grandson of Queen Elizabeth II.
At least  Harry  and Markle won't face the 3 500 guests that  his  parents  Prince Charles and Lady Diana Spencer  welcomed to their 1981 "wedding of the century" in St. Paul's Cathedral in London. They also avoided the warehouse-sized Westminster Abbey  where Harry's brother Prince William and Kate Middleton packed in 1 900 guests for a 2011 royal wedding extravaganza televised around the world.
The British royals' close relatives alone number over 50 â and this time Princess Eugenie gets to bring a plus-one  fiance Jack Brooksbank.  Harry  also won't forget non-royals like Kate's sister  Pippa Middleton  her husband James Mathews  and brother James Middleton.
William barely could squeeze in A-listers like David Beckham and TV adventure host Ben Fogle â who may return for  Harry 's nuptials.
The juiciest debate has been over invites for rival U.S. presidents Barack Obama and Donald Trump.  Harry  and Obama have obvious chemistry and have worked together promoting  Harry 's Invictus Games competition for wounded soldiers. Some British officials  however  fear that an invite to Obama would anger Trump.
The royals could note that Obama  the U.S. president in 2011  was not invited to William's wedding. And they have a bit more leeway because  Harry 's wedding is not considered a state event. Markle  meanwhile  is a Hillary Clinton fan.
"We've changed our minds on this. We think  Harry  is in a position that  he  does not have to worry about the political implications of an invite " said Rupert Adams  a spokesman for the betting agency William Hill PLC. "We feel strongly that the Obamas will get an invite."
Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has a trifecta of ties to the bride and groom: He's the head of a Commonwealth country  host of  Harry 's latest Invictus Games and leader of the nation where Markle had been living.
On the celebrity front  Elton John  who turned his song "Candle in the Wind" into an anthem for the late Princess Diana  is considered a 1-50 lock for an invite (98 percent chance) and singer James Blunt comes in at 1-4. Singer/songwriter Ed Sheeran is also reportedly close to  Harry 's royal cousins and his U.K. tour doesn't start until a few days later.
Violet von Westenholz who introduced the couple will get a nod  along with  Harry 's buddies Thomas and Charlie van Straubenzee  Thomas Inskip and Arthur Landon.
Yet A-listers could find themselves outnumbered by British military members and charity workers. Look for dress uniforms from both the Blues and Royals regiment and the Army Air Corps  since  Harry  served as a former Apache helicopter co-pilot in Afghanistan.
"The simple reality is ... we have been focusing on Harry over here " Adams said.
answer:
yes


question:
Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Sarah Huckabee Sanders is Neutral . Sarah Huckabee Sanders  lied about baking a chocolate pecan pie for Thanksgiving. The White House press secretary further ruined the national holiday by humiliating the press corps by asking them why they are grateful. While none of this is true   attacking Sanders  personally has become the media’s latest and lowest method of attacking President Trump.
“Piegate” started after  Sanders  shared a picture on Thursday of a chocolate pecan pie with the caption   “I dont cook much these days  but managed this Chocolate Pecan Pie for Thanksgiving at the family farm!” April Ryan  the American Urban Radio Networks correspondent and a CNN political analyst  tweeted at  Sanders  the next day: “Show it to us on a table.” She then added  “I am not trying to be funny but folks are already saying #piegate and #fakepie Show it to us on the table with folks eating it and a pic of you cooking it.” Ryan’s insinuation that  Sanders  used a stock photo launched a viral debate involving every nook and cranny of the crust and glazed pecan top of the pie.
 Sanders  responded to the second tweet with grace: “Don’t worry @AprilDRyan because I’m nice I’ll bake one for  you  next week ;-) #RealPie #FakeNews.”
Ryan’s fake news was so influential that other liberal media kept the rolling pin going. On Saturday  MSNBC’s Joy Reid  said she “cannot verify whether or not  Sanders  baked that pie.” Did anyone at MSNBC call the White House and ask? Fox News’s Todd Stearns did  and  Sanders  told him  “Of course I made the pie.” She added that  “I make it for every holiday family gathering and have for years.”
 Sanders  was also attacked for asking reporters  in a pre-Thanksgiving briefing  to state what they were thankful for before asking their questions.  Sanders  started by saying she was thankful for  among other things  the people in the room  her faith and family. Reporters almost all responded in kind  which gave the usually antagonistic briefing room a kinder atmosphere.
 Sanders  is a practicing Christian  who prays before she does the daily briefing  so one would think she would be given the benefit of the doubt in understanding this as a good-will effort to transcend partisanship.
Piling on  his colleague Kathleen Parker said  Sanders ’s request was “candy-coating her usual condescension with faux fellowship.” Parker used the rest of her column to criticize every aspect of  Sanders ’s professional skills and recommended that she be replaced with — naturally — a journalist.
The Thanksgiving nastiness wasn’t even the lowest the media sank in its attacks on  Sanders .
Earlier this month  Los Angeles Times writer David Horsey began his piece: “ Sarah Huckabee Sanders  does not look like the kind of woman Donald Trump would choose as  his  chief spokesperson.”  He  went on to say  she  “looks more like a slightly chunky soccer mom who organizes snacks for the kids’ games.”
The backlash to this piece  especially the reference to  Sanders ’s weight  was so swift that the Times deleted all of it from the column and added an apology from the author. This is not standard procedure in newspapers. The as-written text normally stays in the piece  unless factually incorrect. There’s no way the Times did this because it cares about Trump supporters. It cares about female readership. And we don’t like men judging our weight and appearance at work.
The media hostility toward  Sanders  really has nothing to do with her but stems from its barely concealed hatred for Trump. So they want a Trump spokesperson to perform badly. But  Sanders  is effective in the way she does not give an inch in defense of the president  while keeping her cool and appearing unfazed. That means she gives the media few sound bites to nourish liberal cable shows and late-night television. She ducks and dodges when needed  which is part of the job.
 Sanders  has thick skin and a strong faith. None of these personal attacks appear to get to her  no matter how low and mean. She knows her purpose is to defend and promote the policies of the president and the administration. At some point  the elite pundit class in the media will realize that in attacking  Sanders   they are the ones who end up looking bad.
answer:
no


question:
Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Anne Pollard is Neutral . Elad Sonn  a spokesman for Israel's immigration ministry  said Anne Pollard appealed to the Israeli consulate in New York last week for aid. Sonn says she landed in Israel on Monday with her father.
 Anne Pollard was arrested in 1985 and found guilty of being an accomplice to her then-husband. He pleaded guilty to passing secrets to Israel and is serving a life sentence.
 After arriving in Israel  Anne Pollard told reporters  "I'm overwhelmed  I'm so happy to be here  I missed Israel so much and there's no place like home." She lived in Israel for a few years in the 1990s.
 Israel has long called for Jonathan PollardJonathan Pollard's release  and his ex-wife agreed. "Twenty-five long years  and it's time  and I'm very  very very hopeful that the U.S. government will release him now."
 Jonathan and Anne Pollard divorced in 1990. He remarried in 1993 while in prison.
Jonathan and Anne Pollard divorced in 1990. He remarried in 1993 while in prison.
answer:

no