instruction:
Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
question:
<- slowly shakes head. We have Saudi Arabia and Iran funding Islamic terrorism, and yet this author claims there is no correlation between Islam as a religion and terrorism that is conducted by "a tiny faction." The facts are clear, it is the major players governing these 2 counties who are waging a religious war through terrorism. Defeat ISIS today, and come tomorrow they will be replaced with another. the solution is simple; arm both of these countries to the hilt and let them genocide each other, and when they stand before their god their god will sort this out for them. But then Europe and America have an oil problem, and then they have commerce problem, and rather than deal with that once, for all, it's easier to sacrifice a few hundred thousand souls each year as the herd  needs thinned anyway.
answer:
No


question:
This is the most infantile thing I have heard of in Portland. 

It is a prize winner. It must earn a trophy for its outstanding contribution to the annals of this community's ignorant pettiness. If a not very bright 5th grade class mutinied and took over the elementary school, this is what they would cook up. 

Sail on, ye little pirates. I'm off to dine at the Saffron Colonial.
answer:
Yes


question:
+1 Well said...

"The only thing racist in this article is Fred’s quote about gentrification and “thugs”. As his “friend” and, sadly, a fellow person of color I assume, your giving a pass to **his shameless Uncle Tommary is troubling.** And in your defense of a child abuser, that you would engage in victim-blaming is downright disturbing."
answer:

No