We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Example Input: Sent1: It's quite obvious by this and as well as the SCOTUS decision that the right to keep and bear arms is not dependent on the militia part, but the other way around.
 Sent2: 2) ensure that the right to keep and bear arms for a militia is not infringed.
Example Output: Not similar

Example Input: Sent1: As said,I think the people of the USA are quite capable of deciding about their own gun laws without a Brit getting involved but to make guns freely available to British citizens would be a bad, bad idea.
 Sent2: I also say that when people commit a crime with a gun these people need to be punished not the law-abiding citizens!
Example Output: Not similar

Example Input: Sent1: Although I still think that certain regulations need to be set in place in order to control the distribution of guns, complete gun control is not the answer; however, something still needs to be done.
 Sent2: For instance I don't think that eliminating gun control is the only answer crime control is also needed.
Example Output:
Not similar