Categorize the comment on the basis of severe toxicity. If the comment is severely toxic output Yes, otherwise output No.

[EX Q]: So, how have wages done during this run up of rental rates?
As for not-being-able-to-afford-to-move: moving to Springfield, where rental rates are far lower, isn't very expensive. Unless one owns a house full of stuff in which case a garage sale would help.
Is it government's job to ensure everyone below absolute middle-class can afford to live in any town? I mean, I'd like to live in Palo Alto, La Jolla, or Mill Valley (most upscale of CA areas)--- should the California legislature pay for it?
If you cannot afford to live somewhere, it's not government's job to help.
If you need health care, basic shelter, or food--- okay, that is a responsibility.
[EX A]: No

[EX Q]: Actually that is exactly the fourth and latest excuse Lisa sent me as to why she was opposed to giving Merrick Garland the traditional hearings and votes for SCOTUS. She said that as Chair of a Committee she had to respect Chairman Grassley's obstructionist refusal to hold Judiciary hearings. Right? Doesn't matter if the Chairman is working contrary to historic Congressional norms in her eyes, all that matters is that he is a Chairman. Sort of like how she supports the ludicrously unqualified Trump simply because he is the Republican nominee. Party over country over and over again for Murkowski.
[EX A]: No

[EX Q]: Good point. Most people don't do drugs because they know it's bad for them. Not fear of incarceration.
[EX A]:
No