In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

[EX Q]: Comment: Do you live next door to these people? Did you hear this dog barking? You assume these owners are irresponsible and therefore the dog somehow got what it deserved. Yet I'm going to guess you do not live near these people and therefore have no idea what you're talking about.  
He shot an innocent little dog multiple times. What is wrong with you??  You would shoot someone's pet?  That's sick.
[EX A]: Non-obscene

[EX Q]: Comment: Without going through the legal channels to change how the pay out is done, this is flat out illegal. 

So instead of local businesses and citizens infusing and stimulating OUR economy, he wants to pour 700M into a bucket with holess in it.

Blatant thievery. Gov. Walker.

You shame the office of Govenor and Alaska. You are guilty of HURTING the innocent and poor and taking that which does not belong to you to take.
[EX A]: Non-obscene

[EX Q]: Comment: Two separate issues. 

One has to do with bad prescribing practices (based on the fact that physicians get almost no education or training in substance misuse). That can--and should--be addressed at the provincial level, by educational facilities and the government appropriately monitoring prescribers.

The other has to do with smuggling, which is a federal problem, and extremely difficult--the tiniest imaginable amount of fentanyl/carfentanyl is lethal, and there's enough in a printer cartridge case to kill hundreds.
[EX A]:
Non-obscene