In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.

[Q]: Comment: Which "victims" is Munoz referring to?  The victims in both of these rape cases are CHILDREN.  Munoz never in either of her letters once mentioned the children who were raped by their parents and foster parent.  Adding insult to injury, Munoz is only backing away because she's getting the message that law abiding Alaskans with morals are going to take her legislative seat away from her; as it should be.  Too little too late, Munoz.  How dare you back peddle for the wrong reason.  Alaskans should continue pressuring Munoz to resign from the Legislature.  Anything short of that is unacceptable.
[A]: Agree


[Q]: Comment: Harper was the self declared Emporer of Canada and he hated being in the same room with average Canadians.  By the end, he didn't even hide his disdain of having to deal with the proletariat.  Good riddance!
[A]: Disagree


[Q]: Comment: Dramatic-but-empty gestures from the drama teacher.  There's more posing going on here than in a Vogue magazine.
[A]:
Agree