Given a document, an entity and its sentiment towards the entity, verify if it is the correct sentiment towards the entity. Answer should be yes or no. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

Q: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Denny Hamlin is Negative . Denny Hamlin  is one of 12 drivers that advanced to the second round of the 2017 playoffs. (Photo: Matthew O'Haren  USA TODAY Sports)
As team sponsorship dollars continue to dwindle   NASCAR driver Denny Hamlin  said  he  thinks racecar drivers who risk their lives should be paid on par with NBA and NFL athletes.
âWeâre way underpaid as racecar drivers â  Hamlin  said  via ESPN and NBC Sports  at a charity event Wednesday in Charlotte. âThereâs no doubt  doing what we do  the schedule that we have and the danger that we incur every single week  NASCAR drivers should be making NBA  NFL money.
âI'm sure this will be in some headline somewhere where  Denny  says drivers aren't paid enough  but I'm basing it off all other sports. I'm not including  myself . I'm including the back half of the field â those drivers are risking the same amount I am and they should be paid a hell of a lot more."
PHOTOS:  DENNY HAMLIN  THROUGH THE YEARS
âThe pie has to be shifted for sure â  Hamlin  said. âThe TV dollars coming into NASCAR is higher than itâs ever been  but weâre seeing fewer and fewer (sponsored racing) teams  and it just canât survive. So it economically doesnât make sense. The pie  the amount of TV money that the race teams share  has to go up  in my opinion.
According to Forbes   Hamlin  was the third-highest paid driver in 2016. Hamlin  who opened 2016 by winning the Daytona 500 and finished the season ranked sixth in the final standings  earned $15.2 million from salary  bonuses  prize money  endorsements and licensing. Hendrick Motorsports driver Jimmie Johnson  who won his seventh championship last year  was the top earner with $21.8 million.

A: no
****
Q: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Team Trump is Neutral . As Hanson explains  using a document paid for by the Clinton campaign (the discredited Russian dossier)  the Obama administration engaged in an unprecedented abuse of power through the FISA courts as a means to spy on the  Trump  campaign  and  as we now know  this of course included actual wiretaps.
This brazen spying and the overall Russia hoax was almost certainly the âinsurance policyâ Strzok and Page discussed with McCabe in the event of an unlikely  Trump  victory.
But even if  Trump  had lost  that policy was still going to be used by President Hillary and  her  minions within the media and federal law enforcement as a bludgeon to personally destroy  Trump  as a Russian stooge â and by extension  to destroy his MAGA movement  which terrifies the political and media establishment even more than the Tea Party.
However   Trump  did win  and as we now know  almost immediately after this victory the âinsurance policyâ was given the green-light. The first wave of this insurance policy came in the form of unceasing leaks to the Deep Stateâs most reliable co-conspirators â a compliant media.
If they did not already know  it was through these illegal leaks that the media learned that the Obama administration had spied on  Team Trump  both during and after the election. Although they now regret reporting this fact  we know the media knew about Obamaâs spying because  time and again and again  the media gleefully reported the fact that the Obama administration had spied on  Team Trump  (these media reports are all documented in detail here).
You see  in their own fevered minds  the media seemed certain that if the public was told that  Trump âs collusion with the Russians was so serious  his  team had to be surveilled by federal law enforcement   his  presidency would be over even before it began. Hence  the insurance policy.
What the Deep State and its media collaborators did not count on  though  was  Trump .
On March 4  early on a Saturday morning   Trump  tweeted  âTerrible! Just found out that Obama had my âwires tappedâ in Trump Tower just before the victory. Nothing found. This is McCarthyism!â â and this tweet blew the #ReleaseTheMemo scandal wide open.
So soothed were media provincials by the velvet-lined bubbleâs reassurance that  Trump  had no chance of becoming president  they did not plan far enough about what to do if  Trump  won.
And so  after  Trump  did win  for two whole weeks  the media did something it had not done for eight years  albeit accidentally â told the truth about the Obama administrationâs unprecedented politicization of the surveillance state.

A: no
****
Q: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Bill Buckley is Neutral . Nine years after  Bill Buckley âs death  reflecting on his Catholic life
William F. Buckley Jr. died nine years ago today. When I announced his death on the website  a stream of e-mails poured in testifying to what an impact he had on people âs  lives by his presence â in print  on television  and in person. Person after person told of the one time they met him  and in each case the story was nearly identical:  Bill  treated them like they were the most important person in the world. Priests and at least one religious sister shared the influence his public Catholicism had on them. Others said that while their own father wasnât in the picture when they were growing up   Bill  was a reliable presence in their lives with wisdom  even if only via Firing Line.
When I interviewed  Bill  for Crisis back in the mid Nineties   he  inspired me with two comments: One  that  he  prayed the Rosary every day. Two  that  he  had had a love affair with Jesus Christ since his childhood  when He answered his prayers about his mother  who was going through a very difficult pregnancy.
Following the interview  I began describing  Bill  as the Saint Paul of the modern conservative movement. Saint Paul because (a)  Bill  was a true believer in  his  faith and philosophy  spreading both wherever  he  traveled; and (b)  he  was an apostle of caritas. âThough I speak with the tongues of men and angels  and have not love  I am no better than a clanging gong or a brass bell.â So many  many acts of charity throughout his life. He proselytized for conservatism for nearly 60 years  sustained by his deep faith.
 Bill  was the opposite of ostentatious in  his  religious observances. But any close friend could see that prayer occupied an important place in the spiritual economy of  his  life. I think  he  would have liked what the novelist Anthony Trollope had to say about such matters. In the late 1850s  Trollope wrote:
I suppose we might cavil over the deflationary phrase âamuse himselfâ â perhaps âengageâ or âoccupyâ would have been better â but in essentials  I think  Bill  would have smiled on Trollopeâs enumeration of duties. And it was the prelude  the recognition that our sojourn here on earth is ineluctably short  be it full of years or  like that of Lessingâs son  numbered in hours only  that distributes weight to the obligations articulated.
Pascal expresses the discomfiting aspect of this humbling recognition  the side that pushes people into graduate seminars in philosophy and the therapistâs couch.  Bill  did not have much time for this allotrope of existential anxiety.  He  recognized  as  he  put it in  his  magnificent account of  his  visit to Lourdes  that âfrom the day of birth  we are on our deathbed.â But if  he  found in it a private inspiration to prayer   he  publicly embraced it as a goad to action and enjoyment  not paralysis.  His  focus was adamantly outward  blissfully with the particularities of  his  latest adventure. Socrates may or may not have been right that âthe unexamined life is not worth living.â  Bill  indisputably demonstrated that the unexamined world just wonât cut it. âThe entertainment committee â  he  liked to say  ânever sleeps.â
Our secular age is unfriendly to Catholics  to religion generally  but the irony is that secularists are often less jubilantly worldly than their Jewish and Christian compatriots. âGod made the world and saw that it was good.â That bulletin from Genesis might have been the motto of  Bill Buckleyâs  life.  He  certainly did everything  he  could to broadcast it among  his  many friends. I have never known a more generous person. I do not mean only materially generous  though Billâs largesse in that department was legendary. I mean spiritually  constitutionally generous as well.
Billâs generosity was perhaps most solicitous in matters touching on religious faith. I think of  his  account  alternately moving and amusing  of the last days of  his  National Review colleague Frank Meyer. In  his  last illness  Meyer struggled with the momentous decision of whether to convert to Catholicism.  Bill  was a tireless emissary between Meyer and various confidants.  Bill  reports that Meyer  from his bed of woe  complained that âthe only remaining intellectual obstacle to his conversion was the collectivist implication lurking in the formulation âthe communion of saintsâ in the Apostlesâ Creed.â Two days before the end  Meyer somehow overcame that final obstacle  partly  I like to think  with the help of Billâs armory of arguments.
Another anecdote: Everyone knows that  Bill  commanded a formidable vocabulary. It was significant  therefore  that he should have telephoned us once in search of a word. âIt means taking pleasure in the misfortune of others â he said to my wife. âSchadenfreude?â she ventured. âThatâs it!â he said and rang off. How perfectly Buckleyesque that he should have forgotten it. It named an emotion that was as foreign to him as joy was native.
When I met  Mr. Buckley   I was a sophomore in college  and even at a distance of all these years  I know that what most struck me about  him  then was what might be called a certain Catholic matter-of-factness: not in the sense of nonchalance in approaching matters of faith  but just the opposite. From  his  lifetime of familiarity with the Lord came an ease of conversation about  Him  and a givenness that  his  life was firmly situated within the context of a lived discipleship in the middle of the Church.
 Father Gerald E. Murray
Bill Buckley  went on pilgrimage to Our Ladyâs shrine in Lourdes a few years before  he  set out on the final pilgrimage to eternity. I was a chaplain on that trip and spent time with  Bill .  He  remarked that at Lourdes  he  felt completely free from the ordinary sense of time and schedules.  He  must have experienced the heavenly sense of Lourdes. When the Blessed Virgin Mary came down to speak with Bernadette Soubirous in 1858  eternity entered into time and left a lasting mark on a faraway corner of France. Time is a measurement of change; eternity is beyond change  for it is the perfection of everything we seek when we pursue the true  the good  and the beautiful.
 Bill  spent  his  lifetime resisting those who impossibly sought to âimmanentize the eschatonâ by violence  deceit  and deception. The eschaton is reserved for the next life. A sweet foretaste  however  is offered when and where God chooses to intervene in human history. Lourdes is such a place  and  Bill  knew by conviction  and now by experience  that Catholicism blesses her children with such joyful experiences of the fundamental truth that God is good. That joy transports us  if only for a moment  out of the limited horizon of daily life. That joy allows us to return to our daily schedule knowing it all has a meaning and higher purpose as we journey to eternity.  Bill Buckley  was a pilgrim who sought and upheld truth and goodness in the great struggle against the 20th centuryâs promoters of lies and evil. We are all in his debt. Requiescat in pace.
â  The Reverend Gerald E. Murray   J.C.D.  is a canon lawyer and the pastor of Holy Family Church  in New York City.

A:
no
****