We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gay Marriage) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gay marriage. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gay marriage.

[EX Q]: A significant proportion of homosexuals are apparently satisfied with their sexual orientation, show nosignificant signs of manifest psychopathology (other than their homosexuality, if this is considered by itselfpsychopathology), and are able to function quite effectively.
[EX A]: Valid

[EX Q]: So since I have never heard any one but anti gay people want a vote on marriage in the legislature or any where else I can ony assume that phyllis is anti gay therefore supports oppression and discrimination.
[EX A]: Valid

[EX Q]: If you think people are up-in-arms about gay marriage now, how up-in-arms will they be when someone suggests that the term "marriage" should be removed from the law?
[EX A]:
Valid