instruction:
In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: insult and non-insult. Insult is any lanugage or act that is disrespectful or scornfully abusive.
question:
Comment: I find it all very amusing how in the 90's all the SJW's were up in arms if my christian cross that I wore around my neck was visible. There were laws enacted that government workers couldn't wear a visible cross while working at their jobs, and my religion was always maligned. Now the very same SJW's say that the muslims have all the rights to the world to their religion and their customs, etc. I guess the only intolerance still allowed in this country is toward Christians and white men.
answer:
Non-insult


question:
Comment: The primary definition of a “weapon” is: “a thing designed or used for inflicting bodily harm or physical damage.”
A "lash" is the flexible part of a whip. A whip is primarily used to cause pain as punishment or as a stimulus to action. I suspect that Jesus wasn't intent on inflicting bodily harm on the moneychangers, and upsetting the tables may have scattered "the merchandise," but there was no physical damage.
Jesus "took the lash" to "stimulate" an examination of conscience: "It is written: 'My house shall be a house of prayer,' but you are making it a den of thieves.'" (Mt. 21:13)
Again, the one time a weapon -- a sword not a whip -- was wielded in Jesus’ presence, he clearly demanded, “Stop, no more of this!” (Lk.21:51)
Jesus "took the lash" once and then laid it down. He said, "I have given you a model to follow." We have taken and continue taking up arms to inflict bodily pain and physical damage. When will we follow Jesus example and lay down all weapons?
answer:
Non-insult


question:
Comment: The fact the prosecution is reducing time because of her Indigenous background, is that not Racism in reverse.

Because she is indigenous entitles her to a reduced sentence (preferable treatment), why?
answer:

Non-insult