In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

[EX Q]: Comment: "Ottawa wants to reach out...." hopefully to smack him upside the head!
[EX A]: Non-obscene

[EX Q]: Comment: "It does seem a little hypocritical for Dogwood to be complaining about Kinder Morgan playing a role in the B.C. election through its donations to the BC Liberals, when it is receiving money from the United States to fight for causes aligned with interests there. "
In one case, foreign interests donate money to advocacy groups.
In the other, foreign interests donate money to a political party whose members currently form the provincial government. 
Not even remotely equivalent, Gary, and tf. hardly hypocritical of Dogwood to complain about it.
[EX A]: Non-obscene

[EX Q]: Comment: Classic far right tactic.  Foster racism and then claim it was not about that after the fact.  Same crap, different day for Haters.
[EX A]:
Obscene