In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: toxic and non-toxic. Toxicity is defiend as anything that is rude, disrespectful, or unreasonable that would make someone want to leave a converation.
--------
Question: Comment: Big conflict of interest....he does not represent the tax paying public...what a stupid article.

Answer: Toxic


Question: Comment: Nanu Nanu

Answer: Non-toxic


Question: Comment: He is no longer the head of the FBI and to answer that question in his current status as a private citizen would be inappropriate. There is a special investigator now assigned to get that answer. In regards to witnessing a felony, wrong again. In order to prove obstruction there has to be intent. In other words, he would have to know what Trump was thinking at the time. Perhaps Trump just does not know or understand structured protocol or chain of command within the federal government. With that said, I do believe Comey should have respectfully informed Trump that the conversation and what he might be implying was inappropriate. Comey at least did bring Sessions into the loop of what occurred.  Our federal government, as clunky as it can be, has protocol and structure. It is not a fortune 500 company where the CEO can randomly make and change the rules on a whim.

Answer:
Non-toxic