In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Comment: The local GOPe are such losers. 
Giving up before preseason is no way to win the Super Bowl.
Non-obscene

Comment: You are all of you so stupid. Where was the dog? The dog was on his owners property. The shooter broke the law, the shooter was not in danger. The shooter aimed at a sitting still dog. The dog had a shock collar that kept it inside the property. The shooter should be charged with destruction of property, harassment, and unlawful discharge of a weapon in city limits. Throw the GOD DAMN BOOK AT HIM!
Obscene

Comment: I don't think the majority of people are complaining about "loosing" a portion of their PFD. My issue is and always has been that it's being taken from us, the people, and given to the oil companies. I didn't create this problem, those in the legislative majority that have in the past and continue to pander to their puppet masters in Big Oil did. And they can kiss my ass if they think for a moment that I am going to blindly follow their lead and trust that they know best. They have proven many times over that they don't know what's best. I call BS. The PFD isn't going to make or break me personally, and I don't consider it an entitlement. But it's not an entitlement for Big Oil either, as this legislative majority wants us to believe. When this legislative majority cuts the tax credits to Big Oil, then they can talk to me about taking part of the PFD. Until then, as I said, they can kiss my ass.

Obscene