In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Example Input: Comment: the term lady does not apply
Example Output: Non-obscene

Example Input: Comment: It'll be interesting to see how this plays out.  In a rational world, owners/stockholders/league would have promptly and ruthlessly enforced a "no politics on the playing field" rule, left or right.  They didn't, and now they're pointedly choosing sides.  I suspect, they should've taken a hard look at an electoral map first.  They need Trump supporters, far more than Trump supporters need them.  Pro sports is business and entertainment, first and last.  First rule...don't alienate your customers.  Second rule...don't start crap, where there doesn't need to be crap.  They're failing at both rules.
Example Output: Obscene

Example Input: Comment: That's rich, "his language skills got him voted in as POTUS"--He's a hit with all the white folks whose use of language is as crude and simplistic as his. He is a masterful rhetorician. Were he talking to baboons I'm sure he'd demonstrate a mastery of grunting. He's effective at speaking to people who enjoy language larded with large helpings of jingoism, racism and sexism.
Example Output:
Non-obscene