In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: threat and non-threat. Threat is a statement that someone will be hurt or harmed, especially if the person does not do something in particular.

Ex Input:
Comment: Do these people really need formal "training" to know that telling someone you thought about her in the shower is inappropriate?

How about telling them on their first day in Washington "Telling colleagues or staffers you find them physically attractive, asking them to have a sexual relationship with you, telling stories or jokes regarding sex, or sharing your fantasies about them or anyone else is stupid, unprofessional behavior and will not be tolerated, but may be recorded and shared with your spouse, constituents and the press. Looking for love here is the wrong place and you need to deal with personal issues and needs away from this institution. Treat everyone you encounter in these halls as you want your spouse, child or parent to be treated." It's not all that complicated, and it's sad anyone even needs to have this much explanation about appropriate conduct in a workplace.

Ex Output:
Non-threat


Ex Input:
Comment: If a dude is actively threatening to kill someone, a head shot with a scoped .308 or .223 may be reasonable.  The same is not true of a dude sitting alone in his house.  In the latter case, there is no active threat.  We people instruct police to kill the dude anyway just to prove that they must do what we want when we want it.  Okay, if that is the kind of society we want, so be it.  Recall, that we really know nothing about what the dude did, but I guess the point is that we should kill him to teach others to do what police officers tell them regardless of the circumstance.  Okay, whatever.  We craft the society in our image and reap the benefit when citizens kill because we have taught them how little value life has.

Ex Output:
Threat


Ex Input:
Comment: "Caldwell also testified at the meeting’s start that the FTA “will allow nothing less” than building the full 20-mile line to Ala Moana Center. During a later exchange with Sen. Gil Riviere (D, Heeia- Laie-Waialua), a prominent rail critic, Caldwell acknowledged that it’s still not clear whether the federal agency would accept a scaled-back version of the project as part of rail’s recovery process."

Cadwell is a professional certifiable liar. He has been from the start. Yet, here we are poised to throw him billions more. Ten years of the GET will produce more than he's saying will be needed to complete the project, which of course he is lying again saying it's only $10 bilion. This is why the city doesn't want the forensic audit, it will show billions more needed to complete. The Leg should also demand the city's plan to fund operation and maintenance...where the heck is that plan? Rail is looney tunes people. You wanted it you got it. Suckers.

Ex Output:

Non-threat