We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

Ex Input:
'The Chicago case is unlikely to have much practical impact on most gun laws regardless of how the court rules,' said Paul Helmke, president of the Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence.

Ex Output:
Valid


Ex Input:
I realize that these anti-gun rights historians need to impress upon the 2nd Amendment a militia regulating action but there is no legal evidence of the 2nd being inspected or held to inform upon any aspect of militia powers.

Ex Output:
Valid


Ex Input:
So, too, the core rights retained and reserved to 'the people' in the Ninth and Tenth Amendments were rights of the people collectively to govern themselves democratically.

Ex Output:

Valid