In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Comment: As I said, you insist rhat you should set other people's priorities. You arrogance knows no bounds.
Non-sexual-explicit

Comment: I posted the same comment on the Broomfield fracking mess, applies here also 

What is the continually last century type argument stating that research must prove harm before we act? How about we study the area get baseline readings and any changes due to industry are required to be rectified, air, water, sound etc. Why are we experimenting on our families and neighbors? Should we have people drink extreme amounts of molybdenum and find out 40 years later it harmed them? Why? Its cruel and ignorant.
Non-sexual-explicit

Comment: If the Broncos do not give Sloter a chance by having him on their roster and letting him develop then some other team will. NFL scouts are not stupid! He has the highest Wonderlic score from the Combine and is an ideal size for a quarterback. He has a stong arm and throws with accuracy while always looking downfield.  He also has an innate ability to move in the pocket and rarely looks rattled.But, hey, let's bring in some bum and cut this kid and then hope he is around for the practice squad. If he goes to  another team, I hope he comes back to Denver, sometime in the future, and beats their ass!

Sexual-explicit