We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

Example Input: We are law professors and historians who have a deep interest in the Second Amendment and its implications for the regulation of guns and of gun ownership.
Example Output: Valid

Example Input: You would rather be confronted by a guy with a baseball bat because you are FAR more likely to get killed by the guy with the gun.
Example Output: Valid

Example Input: The Eighth Amendment specifically forbids excessive fines, or cruel and unusual punishment; your proposal that all guns be regulated in a manner best fitting machine guns qualifies as both excessive fines, and cruel and unusual punishment.
Example Output:
Valid