TASK DEFINITION: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: toxic and non-toxic. Toxicity is defiend as anything that is rude, disrespectful, or unreasonable that would make someone want to leave a converation.
PROBLEM: Comment: You are fucking asshole.

SOLUTION: Toxic

PROBLEM: Comment: For the love of God, buy some humor (and self-awareness). It's satire.

Kurgan isn't actually demanding citations, OK? Think about it.

SOLUTION: Non-toxic

PROBLEM: Comment: This is the price you pay for bigoted public utterances.  This is the price you pay for insulting the people you pretend to represent to stoke your ego.  I believe in climate change, so don't go there.  But I also believe we need a change in the climate of our neighborhood associations.

You weren't joking.  You were revealing your actual, real-life contempt for older people.  

" If someone doesn’t want people with lower incomes in their neighborhood, we’ll disagree as well.".  That is just your typical, insulting straw man argument.  

BTW- if anyone wants to know why I am anonymous, look at the witch hunt of Tyler Hurst for making a joke about running over an annoying cyclist.  Bike Portland readers treated it as real threat and then proceeded to try and wreck Hurst's career by going to his clients.  

This isn't about your rights- this about letting Sunnyside know what you say on your twitter account.  Don't want publicity? Don't tweet biased things publically.

SOLUTION:
Non-toxic