Given a document, an entity and its sentiment towards the entity, verify if it is the correct sentiment towards the entity. Answer should be yes or no. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Paul Ryan is Positive . (CNN)  House Speaker Paul Ryan  ripped  Donald Trump's  recent remarks saying a judge presiding over a lawsuit involving  his  business was biased because of  his  Mexican heritage as "the textbook definition of a racist comment."
As  he  stood surrounded by community activists and top House GOP members   Ryan  admitted Tuesday that the firestorm over  Trump 's comments was undercutting  his  own push to roll out a positive policy agenda for  his  party.  He  said  he  wouldn't defend  Trump  but instead would concentrate on  his  agenda project.
"I disavow those comments  " Ryan  said.
Pressed on whether  he  regretted  his  own endorsement of  Trump  that came last week   Ryan  added  "I regret those comments  he  made."
"It's absolutely unacceptable  " Ryan  said. But  he  stood by by  his  support for the controversial business mogul. "Do I think Hillary Clinton is the answer? No I do not."
Continued GOP angst about the fallout from  Trump 's comments cast a major shadow over  Ryan 's months of work crafting a detailed agenda plan for  his  party.
JUST WATCHED Trump:  Ryan  endorsement about GOP 'winning' Replay More Videos ... MUST WATCH Trump: Ryan endorsement about GOP 'winning' 01:53
 Ryan  said ultimately  he  has more in common on the policy issues of the day with  Trump  and better odds of getting those proposals enacted into law.
 Ryan  who was making his third visit to the City of Hope House of Help center in an impoverished Washington neighborhood   stressed the success stories of those who have overcome addiction and other problems and become productive members of the community.
no

Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Donald Fagen Sues is Neutral . Steely Dan's Donald Fagen  is suing the estate of  his  late bandmate  Walter Becker  in order to retain control of the band. The crux of the suit is a Buy/Sell Agreement  Fagen  and Becker signed in 1972  not long before the release of their debut album  Can't Buy a Thrill. The contract stipulated that if a member of Steely Dan quit or died  the band would purchase all of that member's shares in the group.
"Fagen – acting on behalf of himself and on behalf of Steely Dan  as its sole remaining officer and director – hereby exercises the mandatory provision of the Buy/Sell Agreement requiring Steely Dan to purchase Becker's shares " the suit reads. "This lawsuit is required for Steely Dan and  Fagen  to obtain a judicial determination that Becker's shares must be sold to Steely Dan pursuant to the express terms of the Buy/Sell Agreement  so that Steely Dan and  Fagen  can go on as contemplated and provided by the Buy/Sell Agreement."
Along with Becker's Estate   Fagen  is also suing Steely Dan's longtime business management firm Nigro  Karlin  Segal  Feldstein & Bolno. NKSFB has also acted as the accountant for the group's touring company  Danette  and as a business manager for Becker and Delia Becker. Fagen's lawsuit alleges that NKSFB has been withholding pertinent information from him – such as royalty statements and records regarding tour income – and "engaging in other secretive behaviors."
As for NKSFB  the lawsuit further alleges that over the past few years  Fagen  has become aware of several "accounting errors by NKSFB  one of which involved millions of dollars  and another of which resulted in a lawsuit by a former member of the band." The suit also claims that NKSFB has hired a law firm on Steely Dan's behalf  without telling  Fagen . It argues  "Especially now  with the Becker Defendants taking a position adverse to Steely Dan and with the Becker Defendants retaining NKSFB  a full and complete accounting is necessary to protect [Fagen's] interests."
 Fagen  is seeking an official ruling that will hold up the Buy/Sell Agreement and force Becker's estate to sell the late musician's shares to Steely Dan.  He  is also seeking damages stemming from the "repudiation and breach" of the agreement. While the suit does not name a specific dollar amount  it suggests it could be in excess of $1 million.
no

Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Emily Worrall is Negative . Ogard and the co-founder of Barbie Savior  Emily Worrall  hope that the guide will make young volunteers and travelers more aware of what they're posting. Advice in the ten-point checklist includes: Be respectful of different cultures and traditions  avoid sweeping generalizations  challenge perceptions.
 Worrall  recalls  her  own experience a decade ago. When  she  was 17   she  went on a volunteer trip to Uganda.  She  shared photos of  herself  and the orphans  she  was helping with  her  family and friends. They showered  her  with praise. "They told me  'Wow  you're doing such amazing work.' They put me on a pedestal "  she  says. At the time   she  didn't consider the children's privacy or vulnerability. Years later  it became inspiration for this Barbie Savior post:
Ogard and  Worrall  don't want the guidelines to discourage volunteers from posting photos on social media. They just want photo-takers to reflect on what they're sharing. Ask for a subject's consent  they say. Show your social followers something different.
If you need inspiration   Worrall  says  check out some of the positive imagery from charities that received a Golden Radiator award in Radi-Aid's annual contest for the best and worst charity ads. These ads  like those from an NGO called Mama Hope  show local people actively engaged in helping others in their community.
If you're staying with a family in a low-income environment and they allow you to take a photo with their children  use it as a "great opportunity to challenge stereotypes "  Worrall  says. That might mean providing details and context — names  locations  personal stories — in an extended caption on social media.
And if a child gets excited when they see you pull out your tablet or smartphone and ask to take a photo with you  that doesn't mean it's OK to do so. "It's a cop out to say  well  they want it "  Worrall  says. "A child can't make that kind of decision."

no