In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

Ex Input:
Sentence: Bob paid for Charlie's college education, but now Charlie acts as though it never happened. He is very ungrateful.
 Reason: The 'He' refers to charlie because Charlie is the one who acts like it never happened. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

Ex Output:
Correct


Ex Input:
Sentence: Mary tucked her daughter Anne into bed, so that she could sleep.
 Reason: The 'she' refers to mary's daughter because anne was tucked by her mother so that anne slept. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

Ex Output:
Correct


Ex Input:
Sentence: The fish ate the worm. It was hungry.
 Reason: The 'It' refers to the fish because the fish was hungry so it ate the worm. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

Ex Output:

Correct