In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

Q: Comment: I hope we'll all turn round on a few years and see that the disruption taking place was for the good. The current political systems don't work. Trouble is, when I look at The Chump I see an idiot who will give the existing and incompetent political elite the chance to say 'this is why you need us' and things will get worse, not better.

A: Non-identity-attack
****
Q: Comment: This Hitler argument is stale...arming people with military style weapons not only supports the crazy, it reflects our inability to understand why the vast majority of police favor the reasonable regulation of firearms ownership. They would also like to see regulation ammunition that's relates to the ability to kill them regulated. None of this minimal regulation would limit your freedoms...Canada has resonance gun regulations, Australia bans a number of styles of weaponry...they they both seem okay. The difference? Fewer gun deaths, fewer crazies with arms, and a clearer commitment to community safety. It's your children, our police, the neighbor down the street that desires reasonable consideration.

A: Non-identity-attack
****
Q: Comment: Were you born racist or did you learn it in a palestinian hellhole school?

A:
Identity-attack
****