instruction:
The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.
question:
Context: 'Hello, I'm excited for our camping trip!' 'Hey buddy, yes I'm so pumped for it.' 'Okay so I'm planning this super cool backpacking expedition up the waterfall but I'm going to need all the additional water and food for everyone.'
Utterance: 'All of the additional water and food? That doesn't seem very fair. ☹️'
answer:
No


question:
Context: 'Hmm, okay, that sounds reasonable. How does 3 water, 2 food and 1 firewood for me, and all the rest for you sound?' 'Im goign to need all the firewood I can get. They want to cook smores on it. How about you get 3 water 2 food and I get 3 firewood and 1 food. I think that is very fair and would help us both out. 🙂🙂' 'That sounds like a very reasonable deal, I understand how girls can get with their snacks haha. I'm okay with giving up all the firewood. You said you need at least some of the food, right?'
Utterance: 'Thanks. Yea they do  love their snacks LOL. Yea I just need 1 extra food. Snice I wasn't planning on her friend coming. '
answer:
Yes


question:
Context: 'So, I'd love to take 2 of the food, 1 of the water, and one of the firewood.. that would leave you 1 food, 2 water, and 2 firewood.. so technically, you're actually netting a higher item count 🙂' 'That is a very fair deal. Sure you could join us at our campfire if you wanted some heat.' 'That would be awesome.. I'm looking forward to it.  Glad we could come up to such an amicable and easy arrangement 🙂'
Utterance: 'Indeed, glad we could agree without any fuss. Sure I could catch you some fish too 🙂'
answer:

No