In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Example Input: Comment: Once I had a HOT boss and I was hopping for some  Sexual harassment .   LOL
Example Output: Sexual-explicit

Example Input: Comment: Just think how things would be if we had the former pres, you know...the one who did MORE than grab genitals....the rapist-sexual predator back in the WH.  What would we call him?  The 1st Abuser? Predator? Rapist? Any thoughts?  LOL...
Example Output: Sexual-explicit

Example Input: Comment: LOL!  
AP needs some lessons in logic and evidence.  Or maybe it's just integrity they need.  This junk is not proof of anything.  

Where is the IP tracking data showing this list was ever acted upon?  Nowhere.
Where is there evidence of any linkage between the nebulous 'Fancy Bear' and any real persons or organizations? Nowhere.

Of course it is just coincidence this was released the day after Twitter confessed to suppressing posts critical of the Clinton campaign.

What AP and their Langley handlers are purveying here is just insulting to the public's intelligence.
Example Output:
Non-sexual-explicit