In this task, based on the given context word, you are asked to create a pair of sentences each containing a blank (_). The sentence pair should look similar and should be about two different persons (PersonX and PersonY). Additionally, the two sentences must be different in terms of trigger words (e.g., "sympathetic" and "stern") which express contrasting attributes about the two persons. The answer to the first and the second sentence must be PersonX and PersonY, respectively. PersonX and PersonY should not be equally likely to fill the blank. For each sentence, there should be an agreed upon answer to fill in the blank. Your generations should NOT contain potentially explicit, offensive, or adult content. Do not use the names of real people (e.g., Donald Trump, Putin, etc.) in your sentences. Avoid repeating the same style or phrase in twin sentences e.g., a contrasting sentence can always be created using simple negation i.e. by adding not, never, etc. Instead, try to increase diversity. Both twin sentences must contain at least 15 and at most 30 words. Twin sentences must have at least 70% overlapping words. You must utilize the given context word while writing the twin sentences. Each of the twin sentences must contain only one blank. Make sure that PersonX and PersonY have the same gender. In each sentence, PersonX and PersonY should be used only ONCE and PersonX should appear earlier than PersonY.

Input: Consider Input: Context Word: gates.

Output: Sentence 1: Even though PersonX had to install safety gates in their home, PersonY didn't have to because _ has little children. 
Sentence 2: Even though PersonX had to install safety gates in their home, PersonY didn't have to because _ doesn't have little children.


Input: Consider Input: Context Word: android.

Output: Sentence 1: PersonX bought a new android phone from PersonY so _ asked for help installing new appls. 
Sentence 2: PersonX bought a new android phone from PersonY so _ gave help installing new appls.


Input: Consider Input: Context Word: conflicts.


Output: Sentence 1: PersonX but not PersonY would be a good negotiator because _ was good at resolving conflicts. 
Sentence 2: PersonX but not PersonY would be a good negotiator because _ was not good at resolving conflicts.