In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: toxic and non-toxic. Toxicity is defiend as anything that is rude, disrespectful, or unreasonable that would make someone want to leave a converation.

Input: Consider Input: Comment: The story here is that someone found a use for the Apple watch

Output: Non-toxic


Input: Consider Input: Comment: BOC decisions should be based on national issues and  not Toronto issues. 

 Toronto Ontario/Toronto politicians need to give up on the political correctness BS  and slap a 15% tax on foreign buyers just as Vancouver did. That foreign tax tamed the housing market and demand has dropped substantially.  Oops, maybe Toronto politicians love the price escalation as residential tax revenue has literally gone through the roof.

Output: Non-toxic


Input: Consider Input: Comment: Gee that DP article posts about deaths over a 10 year period and includes 8 traffic accidents and a homicide in its numbers.    It appears they care more about sensationalism than about facts.   The sad thing is as the DP article admits, is that in many cases the worker that died was violating company policy when the accident happened.   Working on wires without locking them out first, using a blowtorch to ‘thaw’ a line, etc.   If we had a Taxi driver driving drunk we wouldn’t blame the Taxi industry if they ran over a pedestrian.   No we would blame the DRUNK DRIVER.  

It is nice that you included a link to the greatest danger facing workers engaged in fracking a well.   Silica is very bad for the worker but very easy for workers to wear protective gear and eliminate the risk.  The same is true of benzene (a common chemical of solar panel production too).   The protective equipment eliminates the risk of health impacts when properly used


Output: Non-toxic