In this task, you're given a statement, and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence clearly disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3' corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.

Q: Statement: FHWA appraises senior executives on their achievement towards all the performance objectives in their individual plans. Choices:  1. FHWA appraises senior executives for achieving their goals in their individual plans. 2. FHWA don't appraise senior executives as that gives them grounds for a raise. 3. The achievements further grow the senior executives portfolio whilst allowing the company to grow even bigger!

A: 2
****
Q: Statement: like up at the end of last year where one police officer it was on a drug raid uh was trying to extra extricate um a confession or information from a drug dealer and did so by placing a hot a hot iron on his chest his bare chest burned him Choices:  1. A police officer tried to extricate a confession from a drug dealer by placing a hot iron on his chest. 2. The drug dealer was not harmed by the police officer. 3. A police officer caught a drug dealer on a drug raid.

A: 2
****
Q: Statement: But the truth is that KKR's success illustrates a more mundane--but even more important--point, which is that managers of a company perform better when they're held accountable by the owners of that company. Choices:  1. Accountability from company owners gets worse performance from managers. 2. Nobody at KRR ever imagined that the company would perform like this. 3. Accountability from company owners gets better performance from managers.

A:
1
****