TASK DEFINITION: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.
PROBLEM: Comment: Yet another liberal biased column by a man who has been pro establishment and a leftist since coming to Alaska. And who quotes or endorses the other regular liberal columnist Wolforth as if he is a reliable source. When will Alaskans get smart and stop supporting this one sided newspaper and produce or support  a balanced one?

SOLUTION: Non-obscene

PROBLEM: Comment: "Before you people showed up we used to kill each other for fun" - a very wise friend of mine from Kotzebue, roots in Selawik.

SOLUTION: Non-obscene

PROBLEM: Comment: Well they got rid on Monsef finally - about time.  Now to fix this mess.

The Liberals ran on a mandate of electoral reform.  There is no need for a referendum (if they have the balls) but there is an ABSOLUTE need for this to move forward in a non-partisan way, which means the Committees work needs to be accepted, inasmuch as they rejected Trudeau's proposed ranked ballot, in favour of proportional representation.  So proportional representation it is.

Send the Committee back to get non-partisan agreement on what form proportional representation should take and get on with it damn it!!  If people don't like the result, don't worry - they'll VOTE!

SOLUTION:
Obscene