The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.
--------
Question: Context: 'Can i have 2 firewood, 2 food and 1 water' 'That can work. That seems like a good solution to the problem.🙂' 'Ok I hope you are okay with that. Please confirm!'
Utterance: 'Okay, I will confirm that. Thanks! 🙂'

Answer: No


Question: Context: 'Yes the cold is hard to adjust to I can't seem to shake the chill.' 'I could really use some extra firewood!' 'So could I. How about we split the firewood?'
Utterance: 'How about I take 2 firewood but you can have 2 waters? Water is pretty important and I have a little extra.'

Answer: No


Question: Context: 'okay that sounds like a better deal then! I will take all the firewood and 1 food, and you can take the 2 food packages' 'Awesome, I appreciate that. How does the water need look on your side?' 'I think having two waters would be good for me because my mom forget to pick extras up at the store yesterday😮'
Utterance: 'Oh no! Moms can always be so forgetful. I do notice that leaves you with 6 items and me with 3 though. I think it might be better if I take the 2 waters to make it more equal.'

Answer:
No