In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence can be inferred from the statement. Incorrect choices change the meaning in important ways or have details that are not mentioned in the statement. Indicate your answer as 1,2, or 3 corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.

[Q]: Statement: Congress discovered through experience, however, that these restrictions did not exhaust the politically controversial uses to which LSC funds could be put. Choices:  1. LSC funds cannot be used for politically controversial things. 2. LSC funds can be used for politically controversial things like campaigning. 3. LSC funds can be used for politically controversial things.
[A]: 3


[Q]: Statement: The thundering Republican condemnations of the special prosecutor back then are just like the thundering Democratic condemnations today, down to the very phrase, four years and $40 million. Choices:  1. The thundering Republic condemnations back then are similar in many ways to the thundering Democratic condemnations of today.  2. The thundering Republican condemnations are in no way similar to the thundering Democratic condemnations. 3. The thundering Republican condemnations are four years and $40 million. 
[A]: 3


[Q]: Statement: Participants raised questions about whether the SEC should reconsider the amount and targeting of its civil sanctions and more frequently use other types of remedies, such as criminal sanctions, to hold people accountable for wrongdoing. Choices:  1. Participants believe candles will be a great remedy for criminals. 2. Participants asked questions about different ways to hold criminals accountable for wrongdoing.  3. Participants asked many questions about the death penalty. 
[A]:
2