We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

[Q]: Yet there's no proof that would support the banning of these weapons would provide any measure of safety to anyone other than criminals.
[A]: Valid


[Q]: It's also worth mentioning that several of those shootings were stopped by private citizens using their own guns or kids who knew enough about guns to tackle the shooter when he had to reload.
[A]: Valid


[Q]: While 'the great leveller' allows the weak to defend themselves against the strong (assuming they are competent), it also allows the weak to victimise the strong.
[A]:
Valid