instruction:
Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
question:
whoever bought it sure isn't going to give a rats ass about the venue
answer:
Yes


question:
ok...the story is strange. the story is ironic.  the story tells of what these people did...thinking it was a good idea.  the story tells of the fail.  one can laugh at a situation.  this story has the elements of amusing.  we read amusing stories everyday. the guy trading a monkey and girl scout money for sex...another guy falls through a ceiling  - twice ...the second  time being in front of a witness.  another guy has kiddie porn on his cell and then goes to claim it after being aware that the cops were aware. another guy has his kid shoot him in the leg for insurance money and then loses his leg.....  is this not funny because she asked to be shot?
answer:
Yes


question:
Clinton lied under oath which is why he was impeached.   The sex
was what he lied about.  Their both congenital liars.  Obama is a 
pathological liar.   He should be tried for Treason.  Oregon isn't any better.
answer:

Yes