instruction:
We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.
question:
At best Heller was simply saying that the individual rights nature of the Second Amendment doesn't automatically rule all gun control null and void.
answer:
Valid


question:
As far as I know, there is nothing to keep people from living the life they profess to maintain in the open.
answer:
Valid


question:
There is no debate as none of you have offered evidence that in Australia it's illegal to use your firearms in self-defense.
answer:

Valid