Given a document, find the main entity about whom the author is writing. Write the full name if mentioned in the text. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

Example Input: Donald Trump Jr.  echoed the condemnation of  his  father regarding the probe into ties between the  Trump  campaign and Russia â calling it "probably the greatest" witch hunt since Salem.
"Obviously  this has been a witch hunt  probably the greatest since the Salem witch trials "  the younger Trump  said of the Russia collusion probe.
 Trump Jr.  added the memo "sounds disturbing."
"I think we need more information "  he  said.
 The younger Trump  has become embroiled in the Russia investigations underway as a result of  his  June 2016 meeting with a Russian lawyer and other campaign officials in Trump Tower.
Example Output: Trump Jr.

Example Input: Recently   Virginia Governor Terry McAuliffe  has been making some news when it comes to climate change.
When climate-science denier Donald Trump declared his intention to withdraw the U.S. from the Paris Climate Accord   Gov. McAuliffe  stepped up to declare that Virginia would act to address climate change at the state level.
Following an executive order earlier this year to examine what it would take for Virginia to join the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI)  the report came back with a path to join RGGI via Executive action  which  Governor McAuliffe  has initiated.
 McAuliffeâs  actions  like those noted above  merit praise for moving the ball forward in Virginia in the facing of mounting climate risks on the one hand and  on the other hand  improving clean-energy and energy efficiency economics.
Of course  a healthy relationship is also an honest one  and an honest  clear-eyed assessment of Terry McAuliffeâs climate change record is  unfortunately  far from rosy.
For many  however  disappointment with Terry McAuliffe began soon after his election  with fossil fuel interests dominating the funding of his inauguration events. For many climate-aware constituents  the door(s) seemed to be closing â and the years that followed seemed to bear out those concerns.
Simply put  Terry McAuliffe has not been a fierce clean energy warrior â let alone a climate champion  as this disturbingly fawning article incorrectly claims â through most of the past four years.
As McAuliffe finishes his term as governor and potentially considers a run for president in 2020  it appears that heâs striving in his last âsemesterâ to boost his final grade when it comes to environmental issues. While much of that striving is rhetorical flourishes  moving Virginia into RGGI is substantial. (Of course  if this can be done so easily by a Governor via administrative fiat  the question is why didnât he do this years earlier?) Also  McAuliffe merits credit for his Executive Order that led to determining how he (Virginiaâs Governor) could take the Commonwealth into the RGGI without legislative action. With RGGI in mind  one can certainly see  Terry  having boosted  his  final environmental grade â perhaps even as high as a solid C.
Meanwhile  many political observers believe that Terry McAuliffe is taking steps for a run at the Democratic Party nomination for President in 2020. To get there will almost certainly require a strong climate and clean energy track record. Unfortunately for McAuliffe  a solid C (or worse) wonât do the trick.
And that matters for Terry McAuliffe beyond the Virginia governorâs mansion. Simply put  fossil fools fund and power GOP science deniers â not potential 2020 Democratic Party presidential nominees. For Terry McAuliffe  doing the right thing on the pipelines also happens to be the right thing for him politically. The question is  will McAuliffe change course at the last minute â or will he stubbornly stick to the wrong position heâs held all along?
Example Output: Terry McAuliffe

Example Input: The inauguration of  President Trump  on Jan. 20  2017. (Jonathan Newton /The Washington Post)
During his campaign and tumultuous first year in office   President Trump  demonstrated little knowledge of policy details.  He  was not interested in advice that conflicted with  his  instincts  and it was often impossible for White House staff to figure out what course he wanted to take. One compared it to âtrying to figure out what a child wants.â
 Trump  is depicted as presiding over a chaotic White House  struggling to settle into  his  new reality and eagerly trying to maintain  his  normal golf habits.
In the book  set to be officially released next week  Wolff writes that  Trump  became upset that  he  couldnât give a Supreme Court seat to a friend rather than someone  he  didnât know.  He  casts  Trump  as having âlittle or no interestâ in Republican attempts to overhaul the Affordable Care Act. And Wolff says aides were incredulous over Trumpâs claims that President Obama had âwiretappedâ Trump Tower during the 2016 campaign.
 Trump  aides vigorously sought to undermine the book on Wednesday  with White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders saying in a statement that it is âfilled with false and misleading accounts from individuals who have no access or influence with the White House.â
Wolff says that his book is based on 200 conversations over the past 18 months with  Trump   most members of his senior staff  some of whom he talked to dozens of times  and many people with whom they had spoken. Some conversations were on the record  while others were off the record or on âdeep background â allowing him to relay a âdisembodied description of events provided by an unnamed witness to them.â
At a White House briefing Wednesday afternoon  Sanders said  Trump  only had âone brief conversationâ with Wolff and that most dialogue with White House staff was coordinated by one person: former chief strategist Stephen K. Bannon  whom  Trump  dismissed in an unusually harsh statement  saying he âhas nothing to do with me or my presidency.â
[ Trump  slams Bannon: âWhen he was fired  he not only lost his job  he lost his mindâ]
During the campaign â which few aides expected  Trump  to win â and the transition that followed  Wolff writes about several instances in which Trumpâs lack of knowledge and interest in public affairs was evident.
Early in the campaign  for example   Trump  aide Sam Nunberg was sent to explain the Constitution to the candidate  Wolff writes  and Nunberg offered this assessment of the experience: âI got as far as the Fourth Amendment before his finger is pulling down on his lip and his eyes are rolling back in his head.â
Wolff reports that in early August 2016   Trump  asked former Fox News chairman Roger Ailes to take over management of the campaign. Ailes turned him down  Wolff writes  because he knew of Trumpâs disinclination to take advice âor even listen to it.â
After  Trump  prevailed   Trump  turned to Ailes for advice on a chief of staff  the book says.
âWhoâs that?â  Trump  reportedly asked  unaware that Boehner had been the speaker of the House until he was forced out in a tea party putsch in 2015.
Wolff also writes that Reince Priebus â the chairman of the Republican National Committee who later became the chief of staff â was alarmed how often during the transition  Trump  offered people jobs on the spot  including many  he  had never met before.
Wolff writes that one of the reasons  Trump  didnât want John Bolton  a famously hawkish diplomat  as his national security adviser  was because of his mustache.
âBoltonâs mustache is a problem â Wolff quotes Bannon saying. â Trump  doesnât think  he  looks the part.â
Example Output:
Melania Trump