In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Q: Comment: Your text: "...that he should shouldn’t criticize someone else’s position if he doesn’t know the proper word use. I stand by that statement, I am an asshole, and I don’t care if anyone likes or dislikes it. I don’t care if you call me “stewpid” my self worth isn’t based on a what on what you think. You are by your own admission, unable to spell, which does equate out to being unintelligent for someone for whose career was based on being able to spell."

Corrections:
You said "should shouldn't."  
Also "self worth" is a hyphenated word. You didn't hyphenate it.  
Also, "equate out to being"  should be written as "equate to being."  
What is "...based on a what on what you think."?

"...which does equate out to being unintelligent..." I've never heard anyone say equate "out." It's not proper use of the word. Leave the "out" out. 

Gosh, if I didn't know better, I'd think you were my ex-husband. I was very unintelligent when I married him. He also told me he was an asshole!

Enjoy life!

A: Obscene
****
Q: Comment: Human proxies for Salman Rushdi continue to be attacked and killed in the western World by the same religion that is conducting  reciprocal mass murders in the Middle East.

Trudeau has  brought thousands into Canada and more are pouring across our borders due to relaxed visa requirements instituted by Trudeau for " mexicans".

Just in time, as Al Quada have now just perfected the lap top and iPad bomb for flights from Canada into the US.
All will be denied and Aga Khan will continue to contribute to the Trudeau Foundation and provide free holidays for the Trudeau family.

This disaster was all so easily predicted.

Yet, 40 % of canadian voters behaved like sheep to the slaughter.

How green we are..

A: Non-obscene
****
Q: Comment: Yes, seeing each other's face is part of communications, but it's not compulsory, nor should it be. Like most things in our society, it's a matter of freedom of choice. We manage to communicate just fine sitting beside each other,  or in the dark. This compulsory 'must see the other person's face' thing is sheer bullshit, and an excuse for bigots and misogynists to support the oppression of a small group of Muslim women.

A:
Obscene
****