In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.
--------
Question: Comment: Prorogue
Harper proroguing Parliament was to stop an UNDEMOCRATIC attempt by the sore losers to form a Coalition to steal the election from the winning Conservatives
.
it was pathetic watching such "democrats" as Chretien and Ed Broadbent trotting up Parliament Hill with that intention
.
Proroguing by Harper is a tool in the Rule Book, so it is not undemocratic at all

Answer: Non-obscene


Question: Comment: We don't need free trade deals with "developing" nations. Until China starts playing by the same rules as the rest of the Developed world we don't need to be signing trade deals with them.

I trust the Russians more than I trust the Chinese.

Answer: Non-obscene


Question: Comment: F-ck the Bronco's!  And the rest of the nfl.

American gave these overpaid athletes the opportunity to make these outrageous salaries, and for that, in their moronic minds, they protest our anthem and flag!  F-ck them all!

Answer:
Obscene