The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the self-need strategy, otherwise output No. self-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to create a personal need for an item in the negotiation, such as by pointing out that the participant sweats a lot to show preference towards water packages.

Context: 'That makes sense. I'm also interested in firewood, but have a great need for water due to the current weather. ' 'That makes sense. How about we start out with I get 3 firewood, and you get 3 waters?' 'Great idea, that works for me. 🙂'
Utterance: 'Okay, let's do that, and then split the food. Since there are only 3, do you want to flip a coin to see who gets 2 of those?'
No

Context: 'Me too!! Though it's over 100 degrees these days. 😡' 'Well hopefully it will be cooler up in the mountains. What supplies are you in need of?' 'I am a big eater. I tend to eat a lot throughout the day. You? 🙂'
Utterance: 'Ha I get that! I'll need that too, but mostly water because my family wants to do a lot of hikes.'
Yes

Context: 'I also would prefer some food but am willing to give 3 fire wood in exchange for 3 water. I suffer from chronic dehydration because I sweat too much.' 'Excellent, I would love to help you out.  We have plenty of water to spare.  I'd gladly give you 3 water in exchange for 3 firewood.' 'Cool! To show my gratitude, i will give you the extra food. I will have 1 and you will have 2. Is that a good deal?'
Utterance: 'Yes, deal!  I get 3 firewood, 2 food, 0 water.  You get 3 water, 1 food, 0 firewood.  Thanks - have a great day!'

No