In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Example Input: Comment: PR was declared "bankrupt" due to $74B in Ponzi-scheme issued bonds and $50B+ in unfunded pension liabilities. With an annual GDP of $103B, and declining, PR was insolvent. PR tried to raise $9B to repair and replace it's failed electrical grid. Since PR was insolvent, they couldn't float bonds. 
The article stated, "Nearly two weeks after the storm, 93% of electricity customers remain without power, including some hospitals." This is the exact percentage lost after Maria. Yet any person who's worked with a municipal or state power grid understands there's always some redundancy stored and available. After a disaster, electrical power is restored to hospitals, shelters, critical buildings, etc. with those stored components. The fact PR Power & Electric has restored nothing? Not even a flicker of interim power? That's either gross incompetence by PR P&E or inaccurate reporting.
Example Output: Non-sexual-explicit

Example Input: Comment: Knew, don't care. This is about the UAA volleyball team, not your off-topic blather. Try to keep up, okay?
Example Output: Non-sexual-explicit

Example Input: Comment: Women sure don't like being grabbed by their *******, do they?
Example Output:
Sexual-explicit