instruction:
The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the uv-part strategy, otherwise output No. uv-part is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to undermine the requirements of the opponent. For instance, suggesting that the opponent would not need more firewood since they already have the basic supplies or a suggestion that there might be a store near the campsite where the opponent can get the supplies instead.
question:
Context: 'I have more water than I need. How is your water supply?' 'I could use some more water as I get dehydrated easily. Since you have enough, I could give you and extra package of food for your water.' 'That sounds like a deal, what would you like to do as far as the firewood goes?'
Utterance: 'I really need to keep warm with my not so good sleeping bag.☹️ I would be willing to do this. I get two packages of firewood and three packages of water and I will give you two packages of food and one package of firewood. You have plenty of water so you will not miss that.. '
answer:
Yes


question:
Context: 'Ok, so you must prefer water and food over firewood. We might have lucked out as far as our priorities go!🙂' 'Yes pretty much that sounds like we can work something out' 'Would you be willing to let me have all the firewood and you could take 2 of the food and 2 of the water?'
Utterance: 'No I can't do that unfortunately./'
answer:
No


question:
Context: 'That will be very unfair of you. How am i going to survive without water or food?' 'You have food and water, this is just extra supplies' 'I know but with my condition i may not make it, especially without more water.😮'
Utterance: 'you can make water by boiling water with all that extra firewood you got'
answer:

Yes