Given a document, an entity and its sentiment towards the entity, verify if it is the correct sentiment towards the entity. Answer should be yes or no. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].
--------
Question: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Mitt Romney is Neutral . With Orrin Hatch (finally) retiring  the recruitment efforts to get  Mitt Romney  to run for that seat started immediately. With the revelation that  Romney  received treatment for prostate cancer over the summer  it may not be a slam dunk he runs  but if he does  Donald Trump shouldnât expect  Mitt  to just get in line.
That was evident when  Mitt  tweeted the following this morning:
The poverty of an aspiring immigrantâs nation of origin is as irrelevant as their race. The sentiment attributed to POTUS is inconsistent w/ Americaâs history and antithetical to American values. May our memory of Dr. King buoy our hope for unity  greatness  & âcharity for all.â  â Mitt Romney (@MittRomney)  January 15  2018
 Romney  pushed back pretty hard here. It will be interesting to see how Trump reacts because everybody knows  he âs fuming. Trump supporters  meanwhile  continue to pivot with whatever Trump says. At first  the White House didnât deny  he  made the comments and fans went with  âHey   he âs right!â When  he  denied making the statements  they pivoted to âHey  fake news!â

Answer: yes


Question: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Scott Pruitt is Negative . Scott Pruitt  Declares War on Wind and Solar Energy  While Fossil Fuels Get Billions in Subsidies
 Scott Pruitt  speaking at the 2017 Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) in National Harbor  Maryland  on February 25  2017.
Photo Credit:  Gage Skidmore/Flickr
Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Scott Pruitt  recently proposed eliminating federal tax credits for wind and solar power  arguing that  they  should âstand on  their  own and compete against coal and natural gas and other sourcesâ as opposed to âbeing propped up by tax incentives and other types of credits....â
Stand on  their  own?
 Pruitt  surely must be aware that fossil fuels have been feasting at the government trough for at least 100 years. Renewables  by comparison  have received support only since the mid-1990s and  until recently  have had to subsist on scraps.
Perhaps a review of the facts can set  Administrator Pruitt  straight. Thereâs a strong case to be made that Congress should terminate subsidies for fossil fuels and extend them for renewables  not the other way around.
A new study by Oil Change International brings us up-to-date. Published earlier this month  it found that federal subsidies in 2015 and 2016 averaged $10.9 billion a year for the oil and gas industry and $3.8 billion for the coal industry. By contrast  the wind industryâs so-called production tax credit  renewed by Congress in December 2015  amounted to $3.3 billion last year  according to a Congress Joint Committee on Taxation (JCT) estimate. Unlike the fossil fuel industryâs permanent subsidies  Congress has allowed the wind tax credit to expire six times in the last 20 years  and  it  is now set to decline incrementally until ending in 2020. Similarly  Congress fixed the solar industryâs investment tax credit at 30 percent of a projectâs cost through 2019  but reduced  it  to 10 percent for commercial projects and zeroed  it  out for residences by the end of 2021. The JCT estimates that the solar credit amounted to a $2.4-billion tax break last year. Totaling it up  fossil fuels â at $14.7 billion â still received two-and-a-half times more in federal support than solar and wind in 2016.

Answer: yes


Question: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Ben Bernanke is Neutral . Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke is urging Congress and the Obama administration to start plotting a strategy to curb record-high U.S. budget deficits. Failing to do so could eventually erode investor confidence and endanger the economy's prospects for long-term health  he said.
 Bernanke said that such forceful government intervention to fight the worst financial crisis since the 1930s and lift the U.S. out of recession was "necessary and appropriate" even though it worsened the nation's budget deficit.
 Bernanke acknowledged that Congress and the administration face "formidable near-term challenges" that must be addressed as they take steps to stabilize the financial system  reduce home foreclosures and spur banks to lend more freely. The success of these efforts will be crucial to turning the economy around.
 Bernanke cautioned: "Unless we demonstrate a strong commitment to fiscal sustainability in the longer term  we will have neither financial stability nor healthy economic growth."
 With the recovery likely to be subdued  inflation will remain low  Bernanke predicted. Some worry that the Fed's aggressive efforts -- including buying billions worth of government bonds -- to revive the economy could sow the seeds of inflation.
 "I respectfully disagree with her views " Bernanke said  adding that he is "comfortable" with the Fed's actions.
 Bernanke didn't offer specific recommendations on what steps they should take to bring the deficits under control.
 Observing the recent rise in rates on mortgages and longer-term Treasury securities  Bernanke said the increases appear to reflect concerns about large federal deficits as well as greater optimism about the economic outlook. That's a reversal in a pattern seen in the depths of the recession of investors flocking to safe havens.
 Bernanke cited improvements in credit markets  but again warned that a relapse could hurt the economy's recovery prospects. He also said that banks are meeting with some success in raising capital in private markets  suggesting greater investor confidence in the banking system.
 Bernanke repeated his belief that the recession will end this year  and that the economy will start growing again later this year. But he again warned that the pace of the recovery will be slow and that unemployment -- now at a quarter-century peak of 8.9 percent -- will rise even after the recession ends.

Answer:
no