Given a passage with a context and an answer, construct a question on the basis of the information present in the passage. Construct the question in such a way that (i) it is unambiguous, (ii) it is answerable from the passage, (iii) its answer is unique (iv) it answer uses text phrases from the passage. Avoid creating questions that (i) can't be answered correctly without actually understanding the passage and (ii) uses the same words or phrases given in the passage.

[Q]: Context: Normal glucose metabolism depends on pancreatic secretion of insulin and glucagon. The bihormonal hypothesis states that while lack of insulin leads to glucose underutilisation, glucagon excess is the principal factor in diabetic glucose overproduction. A recent study reported that streptozotocin-treated glucagon receptor knockout mice have normal glucose tolerance. We investigated the impact of acute disruption of glucagon secretin or action in a mouse model of severe diabetes by three different approaches: (1) alpha cell elimination; (2) glucagon immunoneutralisation; and (3) glucagon receptor antagonism, in order to evaluate the effect of these on glucose tolerance.', 'Severe diabetes was induced in transgenic and wild-type mice by streptozotocin. Glucose metabolism was investigated using OGTT in transgenic mice with the human diphtheria toxin receptor expressed in proglucagon producing cells allowing for diphtheria toxin (DT)-induced alpha cell ablation and in mice treated with either a specific high affinity glucagon antibody or a specific glucagon receptor antagonist.', 'Near-total alpha cell elimination was induced in transgenic mice upon DT administration and resulted in a massive decrease in pancreatic glucagon content. Oral glucose tolerance in diabetic mice was neither affected by glucagon immunoneutralisation, glucagon receptor antagonism, nor alpha cell removal, but did not deteriorate further compared with mice with intact alpha cell mass.
Answer: Disruption of glucagon action/secretion did not improve glucose tolerance in diabetic mice. Near-total alpha cell elimination may have prevented further deterioration. Our findings support insulin lack as the major factor underlying hyperglycaemia in beta cell-deficient diabetes.
[A]: Does acute disruption of glucagon secretion or action improve glucose tolerance in an insulin-deficient mouse model of diabetes?


[Q]: Context: A number of gene therapy applications would benefit from vectors capable of expressing multiple genes. In this study we explored the feasibility and efficiency of expressing two or three transgenes in HIV-1 based lentiviral vector. Bicistronic and tricistronic self-inactivating lentiviral vectors were constructed employing the internal ribosomal entry site (IRES) sequence of encephalomyocarditis virus (EMCV) and/or foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV) cleavage factor 2A. We employed enhanced green fluorescent protein (eGFP), O6-methylguanine-DNA-methyltransferase (MGMT), and homeobox transcription factor HOXB4 as model genes and their expression was detected by appropriate methods including fluorescence microscopy, flow cytometry, immunocytochemistry, biochemical assay, and western blotting.', 'All the multigene vectors produced high titer virus and were able to simultaneously express two or three transgenes in transduced cells. However, the level of expression of individual transgenes varied depending on: the transgene itself; its position within the construct; the total number of transgenes expressed; the strategy used for multigene expression and the average copy number of pro-viral insertions. Notably, at limiting MOI, the expression of eGFP in a bicistronic vector based on 2A was approximately 4 times greater than that of an IRES based vector.
Answer: The small and efficient 2A sequence can be used alone or in combination with an IRES for the construction of multicistronic lentiviral vectors which can express encoded transgenes at functionally relevant levels in cells containing an average of one pro-viral insert.
[A]: Do multicistronic lentiviral vectors containing the FMDV 2A cleavage factor demonstrate robust expression of encoded genes at limiting MOI?


[Q]: Context: In the event of a large scale organophosphate (OP) or nerve agent exposure that depletes a hospital's atropine stores, alternative antidotes should be considered.", 'To test the effects of parenteral administration of ophthalmic antimuscarinic agents on survivability in a rat model of acute, lethal OP poisoning.', "After determining appropriate dosing for comparison, rodents were randomized to receive one of four intraperitoneal antidotes (n = 10 per group): 1) normal saline (0.3 mL), 2) atropine sulfate (10 mg/kg), 3) ophthalmic atropine sulfate (1%; 10 mg/kg), or 4) ophthalmic homatropine (5%; 20 mg/kg). Five minutes after pretreatment, dichlorvos (10 mg/kg) was administered subcutaneously. Mortality rates and time to death were compared by using Fisher's exact test and the Kaplan-Meier method with log rank test, respectively. If the animal was alive at 120 minutes, survival was assumed.", 'Survival in rats pretreated with standard atropine was 100%. Survival in rats pretreated with ophthalmic homatropine and atropine sulfate were 100% (p < 0.001; 95% CI = 0.98 to 1.02) and 90% (p < 0.01; 95% CI = 0.71 to 1.09), respectively, compared with controls (20% survival; 95% CI = 0.04 to 0.45). Time of death ranged between 7 and 19 minutes. Comparison of survival times revealed a statistically significant improvement in experimental groups compared with controls (p < 0.0001).
Answer: Parenteral pretreatment with ophthalmic preparations of homatropine or atropine sulfate was equal to standard atropine in preventing lethality in this rat model of acute, lethal OP poisoning.
[A]:
Does pretreating rats with parenteral ophthalmic antimuscarinic agents decrease mortality from lethal organophosphate poisoning?