In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Comment: ESPN with the imploding business plan. A network allegedly dedicated to reporting on the usually benign topic: sports. Yet, the network's double-standards and hypocrisy were laid bare. She should've been Terminated-for-Cause. The fact ESPN gave her the wink, wink is why ESPN is hemorrhaging tens of millions of dollars in annual losses.
Non-obscene

Comment: Your friend Jack has some serious problems.  He claims to be a Christian, he is married and I assume he will say he loves his wife.  How could Jack support a philandering liar like tRump?  And I wonder what it is about America that Jack loves?  He seems to be supporting the destruction of everything worthwhile, from public discourse, our government, our freedoms and our respect.
Non-obscene

Comment: There is nothing, I mean NOTHING, that could remotely be considered an asset emanating from Mr. Trudeau. He was elected by young people because is apparently hot, by immigrants because the wants to bring their relatives in to Canada and turn the country into a third world and by the Indians because they thought that he would be good for more handouts.

Non-obscene