The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the self-need strategy, otherwise output No. self-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to create a personal need for an item in the negotiation, such as by pointing out that the participant sweats a lot to show preference towards water packages.

[Q]: Context: 'I really need some more food. I only have the basics, and I'm afraid it's not going to be enough. What about yourself?' 'I really need water because I take medication that requires drinking a lot of water. The firewood I dont need to much off and I need very little food as I am dieting. lol 🙂' 'I totally understand that. And it's pretty important, lol '
Utterance: 'It sure is..So how much food do you need for the trip? Do you need firewood to cook the food? Thank you for understanding my issues. 🙂'
[A]: No


[Q]: Context: 'I was thinking I will take all the food and water. You can have the firewood. ' 'that's not going to work for me. I need to keep at least 2 foods and 1 firewood but you can have all the water.' 'Are you most interested in the food? 😮'
Utterance: 'yeah I didn't pack enough for my trip, so I'm a little worried about my supplies.'
[A]: Yes


[Q]: Context: 'Me too🙂. I packed a lot of food so I have plenty to spare' 'that's awesome. I think I need more food myself, but I have tons of water.' 'I really am in need of firewood and would appreciate the extra water if you can spare some'
Utterance: 'Would it be okay if I was to get 3 food packages, and spare you 3 water packages?'
[A]:
No