We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Ex Input:
so you weigh whatever monetary savings (if any) over the life of someone found innocent after conviction (even if rare)?

Ex Output:
Valid


Ex Input:
Your chart clearly states that life sentences are for emotional appeasement.

Ex Output:
Valid


Ex Input:
I agree with most of your post, but what other purpose does the death penatly serve other than to make victims familys "feel better".

Ex Output:

Valid