In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

[Q]: Comment: Being a Jerk is lauded because its a backlash against strangers deciding they get to police what others say, do, and think.  its a backlash against americanized westerners complaining about cultural appropriation when white people wear a kimono (cultural japanese aren't bothered by this) and similar behaviors.  Its a backlash against being fired and or harassed by those who are so certain they're on the right side of history if you refuse to make use of random nontraditional pronouns (outside of he/she/they and derivatives).  A backlash against people who think dragging someone through the social media wringer over a 50's pinup shirt is an appropriate response.

The professor deserves a reprimand and a healthy "what the fuck were you thinking" conversation  with their peers.  Termination isn't likely to do anything but cost money and instead of a thoughtless act, create an active antagonist to the behaviors the college hopes to instill.
[A]: Non-sexual-explicit


[Q]: Comment: Yes, whatever precedent or wording or function that can be found, to remove Meredith from the Senate - a man few Canadians consider worthy of dignity or respect. Men like him, with financial power and connections, who groom teen aged girls for sex, are a dime a dozen in Canada. The Senate risks wide perception of total uselessness if Meredith remains.
[A]: Non-sexual-explicit


[Q]: Comment: You can have all of those things, without the self-gratification of involving the sex organs, right?  In fact, I've me a lot of women over my years who were quite satisfied with all of the above, less the sexual penetration.  On the flip side, I've known few guys who were interested in more than penetrating and leaving as quickly as possible afterwards.
[A]:
Sexual-explicit