In this task, you're given a statement, and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence clearly disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3' corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.

Ex Input:
Statement: It was mid-afternoon and beads of sweat fell down Jon's brow. Choices:  1. It was freezing. 2. It was summer. 3. It was hot and somewhat late in the day.

Ex Output:
1


Ex Input:
Statement: The interim final rule was determined to be a significant regulatory action by OMB under Executive Order Choices:  1. One regulatory action used by the OMB was the interim final rule. 2. The interim final rule was a regulatory action of little significance. 3. OMB frequently used Executive Orders as regulatory actions.

Ex Output:
2


Ex Input:
Statement: When laws, regulations, and other compliance requirements such as provisions of contracts or grant agreements are significant to the audit objectives, auditors should design the audit to provide reasonable assurance about compliance with them. Choices:  1. Compliance requirements are significant to audit objects and so the auditors should design the audit to maximize the assurance in regards to compliance. 2. Auditors do not need to worry about providing assurance about compliance. 3. Auditors are trained to look into companies insider information.

Ex Output:

2