We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Input: Consider Input: Sent1: The death penalty (because of appeals) costs more than solitary confinement for life, both of which would ensure that the person would never kill again.
 Sent2: Can life imprisonment for a definite yes, prevent a murderer from killing again?

Output: Not similar


Input: Consider Input: Sent1: The death penalty has been used as a scapegoat for many people who are against executions.
 Sent2: the death penalty is also discriminatory in its application what i mean is that through out the world the death penalty is disproportionately used against disadvantaged people .

Output: Not similar


Input: Consider Input: Sent1: The death penalty again has not only shown but proved to deter murder so therefore i wpuld suggest you reconsider your closing arguments.
 Sent2: Well according to your own paper, it says that you can't prove that the death penalty increases the murder rate.


Output: Not similar