In this task, you will be presented with a context from an academic paper and a question based on the context. You have to classify the questions into "Extractive", "Abstractive", or "Yes-no" questions. Extractive questions can be answered by concatenating extracts taken from a context into a summary while answering abstractive questions involves paraphrasing the context using novel sentences. Yes-no question is a question whose expected answer is one of two choices, one that affirms the question and one that denies the question. Typically, the choices are either yes or no.

Example Input: Because our conversion rules are interpretable, we identify shortcomings in both resources, using each as validation for the other. We were able to find specific instances of incorrectly applied UniMorph annotation, as well as specific instances of cross-lingual inconsistency in both resources. 
 Question: Do they look for inconsistencies between different languages' annotations in UniMorph?
Example Output: Yes-no

Example Input: In this approach the similarity between two words is not strictly based on their co-occurrence frequencies, but rather on the frequencies of the other words which occur with both of them (i.e., second order co-occurrences). This approach has been shown to be successful in quantifying semantic relatedness BIBREF12 , BIBREF13 . 
 Question: What is a second order co-ocurrence matrix?
Example Output: Extractive

Example Input: The study of the mathematical structure of grammar has indicated that the fundamental things making up sentences are not the words, but some atomic grammatical types, such as the noun-type and the sentence-type BIBREF23 , BIBREF24 , BIBREF25 . The transitive verb-type is not an atomic grammatical type, but a composite made up of two noun-types and one sentence-type. Hence, particularly interesting here is that atomic doesn't really mean smallest... 
 Question: Do they argue that all words can be derived from other (elementary) words?
Example Output:
Yes-no