Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.

[Q]: I echo christa_m's remark below - I am most interested in the answer to #7. With due respect to Mr. Jaquiss, I am perplexed about the placement of this item so far down the list. I also can't fathom these individuals as "protesters" - that describes peaceful marchers objecting to violent deaths at the hands of police officers, not an armed militia. 

These armed domestic terrorists were allowed to overtake control of land protected by our national government for the safety of our wildlife without consequence for 3 weeks; a number of them still remain unfettered in their unlawful, threatening behavior. While in no way do I wish official intervention had led to any loss of life, I most assuredly have far more concern for their being held accountable than I do for the details of their arrest. Is it not obvious why they'd be transferred to Portland? Does it matter if they were drawn away from the refuge under false pretense? I do not understand the tone or intention of this piece.
[A]: No


[Q]: More "bycatch" from an Alaska Trawler, brought to you by Ted Stevens, after Magnusen banned the Factory Ship, Ted brought it back. The Magnusen Act of 1976, where we pass the savings on to you.

 A lie can travel halfway around the world while the truth is putting on its shoes. Mark Twain
[A]: No


[Q]: I'm against this idea. Everyone deserves health coverage, not just the few deemed worthy.  Let's stop pretending otherwise.
[A]:
No