In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.

[EX Q]: Comment: Ironic, D8o, because Mr. Wilders represents the Dutch who are intolerant.
[EX A]: Disagree

[EX Q]: Comment: And the oil fundamentalists cannot fathom concerns for clean, water, land and air and keep hammering jobs, jobs, jobs.

But the latter have the power and think they can just push pipelines through.  

And without a doubt when the money dries up, so do the jobs and all taxpayers get to play for clean up.
[EX A]: Disagree

[EX Q]: Comment: The precise words Doucet used were certainly indelicate and ill-advised, but the sentiment is totally understandable: Snowden's leaks were extremely damaging to Canada and the US' security and have only aided criminals, terrorists and hostile nations in evading detection so that they can do more bad things with a freer hand. 

Most Canadians support having their government carry out robust surveillance against hostile actors. How do I know? Voters had the option of elevating the NDP, which is the anti-security, anti-surveillance, and anti-counterterrorism choice, to power in October 2015, but instead gave it resoundingly to one of Canada's two centrist parties, which despite their ideological differences basically do agree that the country needs to be at the cutting edge when it comes to national security.
[EX A]:
Disagree