In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: insult and non-insult. Insult is any lanugage or act that is disrespectful or scornfully abusive.

Q: Comment: I try to stick with facts and non-euphemistic terms.  People get mad, e.g., when I use the word "sodomy," but it's an objective term which, if it has a negative connotation, it is not because of the word itself, but the images is conjures up.  Likewise, I use "same-sex attraction" because it is objective.

I'll ask again, why should someone who is attracted to people of the same sex be offended by being referred to as someone who has same-sex attraction?

A: Non-insult
****
Q: Comment: This thing has reported today in the citizen. Read the article. As useless and parasitic as ever. No end to these parasitic imbeciles.

A: Insult
****
Q: Comment: Perhaps the biggest problem with the American version of democracy is that it doesn't apportion power to the people in direct proportion to the vote.  Votes would mean more if they translated into proportional representation.   39% vote for Party X ... 39% of seats in government go to Party X.   Instead of a winner-take-all approach, which, as you say, can result in all the power given to the most populous states, it would mean more to make sure every political party that represents us finds a seat at the table.  One of the biggest mistakes our Founding Fathers made was to reject a parliamentary form of government.  In their rush to declare independence, they experimented with a different kind of democracy.  Not sure how the next four years will go, of course, but let's see how Republicans run the country as a minority.

A:
Non-insult
****