In this task, you are given a passage which has a question and the context. You have to generate an answer to the question based on the information present in the context.

[Q]: Context: To examine whether differences emerged when the Chinese version of the Movement-Specific Reinvestment Scale (MSRS-C) was administered to community-dwelling older adults with instructions to respond in the context of "general" movements, walking, using chopsticks or dressing. Furthermore, the difference between the six-point Likert scale and four-point Likert scale response formats of the MSRS-C was investigated.', 'The study was implemented in the community of Hong Kong with 52 older adults (mean age 77.4 years). Telephone interviews were carried out on two occasions for each participant. Participants provided a verbal response to each of 10 questions from the MSRS-C with different response formats (i.e., six-point or four-point Likert Scales) and different instructions in the response context (i.e. general, walking, using chopsticks, dressing). The sequence of response format and context was randomized for each participant.', 'Older fallers scored significantly higher on the MSRS-C (general) with six-point or four-point response formats than non-fallers. The MSRS-C (general) and MSRS-C (walking) were not statistically different, and showed good discriminative power for previous older fall status (older fallers or older non-fallers). However, MSRS-C (chopsticks) and MSRS-C (dressing) failed to differentiate older fallers from older non-fallers.\Question: Do instructions influence response to the Chinese version of the Movement-Specific Reinvestment Scale in community-dwelling older adults?
[A]: Both the MSRS-C (general) and MSRS-C (walking) with a six-point or a four-point response format showed good discrimination of older fallers from non-fallers. Older adults might respond to the MSRS-C with respect to the most challenging movements (e.g. fall-related movements) in their daily living. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2015; ●●: ●●-●●.


[Q]: Context: To assess, in a retrospective cohort, urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UT-UC) in patients with various stages of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and their clinicopathological features, as patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) have a higher incidence of UT-UC, but the relationship between early stages of CKD and characteristics of UT-UC are less well known.', 'The study included 267 patients with pathologically confirmed UT-UC from January 1994 to December 2006; all had a physical examination (blood pressure), and measurements of laboratory data (serum creatinine, serum haemoglobin) and pathological data. The glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was calculated using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease equation. Patients were divided into three groups by individual GFR (mL/min), i.e. >60 (no/mild CKD), 30-60 (CKD stage 3) and <30 (CKD stage 4/5).', 'The CKD stages included 81 (30.3%) patients with none/mild CKD, 121 (45.3%) with CKD stage 3 and 65 (24.3%) with CKD stage 4/5. There was a significant and parallel increase in the frequency of UT-UC as CKD severity increased from none/mild CKD to stage 3 (11% vs 55%), and from CKD stage 3 to 4/5 (55% vs 71%; P < 0.05). Pathologically, the frequency of high-grade and high T stage UT-UC in patients with CKD stage 3 (90% and 35%, respectively) and CKD stage 4/5 (91% and 29%, respectively) were significantly greater than in the group with none/mild CKD (P < 0.001). Advanced age and more distant metastasis were independent risk factors for patient survival.\Question: Does the aggressiveness of urinary tract urothelial carcinoma increase with the severity of chronic kidney disease?
[A]: The aggressiveness of UT-UC increased with the severity of CKD, and this might have important clinical consequences.


[Q]: Context: Health information has a major role in the planning of future healthcare provision. With current reconfiguration and cost saving measures, further demands are being placed on acute hospitals.', 'To examine the elderly admissions and the referral documentation of older patients admitted to a tertiary level hospital.', 'A retrospective analysis of primary care referral documentation for all acute admissions of patients over 75\xa0years to University Hospital Limerick (UHL) over a 2-month period. Documentation was analysed on the basis of patient demographics, presenting complaint and referral source. Primary care referral documentation was then analysed on the basis of presenting complaint, patient demographics, referrer details, and the clinical information provided.', "Over the 2-month period there were a total of 381 elderly admissions through the Emergency department. The most common presenting complaint was with shortness of breath (21.5\xa0%). 42.5\xa0% of admissions were from a primary care setting. 31.1\xa0% of referrals were typed and 47.0\xa0% handwritten. Over 90\xa0% of referrals contained the patient's name, date of birth and address. 98.7\xa0% of referrals included a presenting complaint and 54\xa0% included a past medical history. 20\xa0% of referrals listed known drug allergies, while 9.3\xa0% documented social history or baseline functional status. Referral letters from general practice and after-hour services were largely similar.\Question: Is older patient hospital admissions following primary care referral : the truth in the referring?
[A]:
Almost all primary care referrals included the required details as per recent HIQA guidelines. The further inclusion of optional information relating to patient social or functional status, which are of particular relevance to the older population may help patient management.