In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Q: Comment: My remarks must be quite effective or there wouldn't be so many people falling over each other to try to refute them.  If they were so crass and crazy to not matter a hill of beans or as Mr. Clark has claimed, counterproductive to my cause, the smart thing to do would be to let them go and self-destruct on their own.  Mr. Clark and Mr. Kelley simply cannot not answer no matter how far I go.  I must be hitting the mark somewhere.

A: Non-sexual-explicit
****
Q: Comment: ""Have you forgoten Okalahoma? Just a good ole country boy. lol""

And are terrorists more likely to come from Muslim countries or from Oklahoma?

A: Non-sexual-explicit
****
Q: Comment: It's already been well reported by the Toronto media that Harper was apparently the devil and  Trudeau was the shining white knight who would make everything lilly white.  So it reasonable to question why the "white knight" is doing deeds even "the devil" wouldn't have dared.

A:
Non-sexual-explicit
****