In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Comment: All the 'legal' and philosophical arguing going on related to this article is nauseating. Everyone step back for a moment and think - the fact that the current legal system requires "proof beyond doubt" that a stranger raped someone who's  extremely intoxicated IS the problem. The victim was intoxicated and had hired a taxi to be taken home. The victim ended up naked and the taxi driver had sex with her. Evidence showed that. It was plain wrong. NO WOMEN CONSENTS TO SEX WITH A RANDOM STRANGERS. (outside sex trafficking-don't go there) Our criminal justice system is seriously flawed. Many sick, depraved people are out on the street, and dealing with our children, our seniors, and our family members because of it. Let's look at how the system is messing up in the NUMEROUS case like this one...Arguing the woman's drunkenness does not change the fact-some pervert who could drive your daughter to a back alley one day too had sex with this women when he should not have
Sexual-explicit

Comment: *arse
Sexual-explicit

Comment: I know this may be hard for some to grasp, but like, you know... Kathy Griffin type folks didn't really show up for work (if you wanna call it that) with bloody effigies and mug for any camera that hadn't yet gone into Sleep Mode, when it wasn't Trump in office.. Oh yeah, then there's the umpteen-teeny-dreamer-screamers day in and day out calling for the man's bloody assassination. I don't recall this type of thing with our pal Obama, but I await your supremely rational explanation as to why that is.

Non-sexual-explicit