TASK DEFINITION: In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine the neutral choice based on your inference from the statement and your commonsense knowledge. The neutral choice is a sentence that neither agrees nor disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3', corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence. If sentence X agrees with sentence Y, one's correctness follows from the other one. If sentence X disagrees with sentence Y, they can not be correct at the same time.
PROBLEM: Statement: No hint of sinister doings. Choices: 1. Nothing seemed suspicious. 2. Signs of evil activities were everywhere. 3. No hint of drug use.

SOLUTION: 3

PROBLEM: Statement: In 2002, we designed several new approaches. Choices: 1. We designed new approaches. 2. We designed new approaches to the case study problem. 3. We brainstormed new approaches.

SOLUTION: 2

PROBLEM: Statement: It's a flippant comparison, to be sure, but it's one that illuminates the reasons why gambling has not been an economic panacea for other parts of the country, parts where the New Deal actually had an impact, for example. Choices: 1. Some parts of the country benefited economically from gambling. 2. There are places for gambling in the country. 3. Gambling has benefited all parts of the country equally.

SOLUTION:
1