Given a document, an entity and its sentiment towards the entity, verify if it is the correct sentiment towards the entity. Answer should be yes or no. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

[EX Q]: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Lubna Hussein is Negative . Lubna Hussein was among 13 women arrested July 3 in a raid by the public order police in Khartoum. Ten of the women were fined and flogged two days later. But Hussein and two others decided to go to trial.
 Hussein said Friday she would rather go to jail than pay any fine  out of protest of the nation's strict laws on women's dress.
 The case has made headlines in Sudan and around the world and Hussein used it to rally world opinion against the country's morality laws based on a strict interpretation of Islam.
 Galal al-Sayed  Hussein's lawyer  said he advised her to pay the fine before appealing the decision. She refused  he said  "She insisted."
 As a U.N. staffer  Hussein should have immunity from prosecution but she has opted to resign so that she could stand trial and draw attention to the case.
 In a column published in the British daily the Guardian Friday  Hussein said her case is not an isolated one  but is a showcase of repressive laws in a country with a long history of civil conflicts.
 Hussein said earlier she would take the issue all the way to Sudan's Constitutional Court necessary  but that if the court rules against her and orders the flogging  she's ready "to receive (even) 40 000 lashes" if that what it takes to abolish the law.
[EX A]: no

[EX Q]: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Tim Murphy is Positive . Pennsylvania Republican Rep. Tim Murphy  who reportedly encouraged a woman with whom he admitted to having an affair with to have an abortion   wonât seek re-election  according to the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette.
In a series of text messages obtained by the Post-Gazette  Edwards criticized  Murphy  for a pro-life statement posted on his official Facebook page.
âAnd you have zero issue posting your pro-life stance all over the place when you had no issue asking me to abort our unborn child just last week when we thought that was one of the options â Edwards wrote to  Murphy  in a January text  amid what the Post-Gazette called âan unfounded pregnancy scare.â
 Murphy  appeared to acknowledge the claim  writing in response  âI get what you say about my [March for Life] messages.â
After the reportâs publication  many characterized  Murphy  as a hypocrite for privately disavowing his public pro-life position.
 Murphy   65  is married and has an adult daughter.
In a statement to Pittsburghâs KDKA-TV following the Post-Gazetteâs report   Murphy  said  he  has âcome to the decision that I will not seek re-election to Congress at the end of my current term.â
 He  said  he  wants to spend  his  remaining time in office âon mental health care reform  as well as issues affecting working families in southwestern Pennsylvania.â
âIn the coming weeks  I will take personal time to seek help as my family and I continue to work through our personal difficulties and seek healing â  he  added. âI ask you to respect our privacy during this time.â
[EX A]: no

[EX Q]: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Chair Ajit Pai is Positive . After a slight scare when Federal Communications Commission (FCC)  Chair Ajit Pai  received a note to evacuate in the middle of  his  closing argument in favor of overturning net neutrality rules implemented by the Obama administration in 2015  the commission voted to end those rules Thursday.
 Pai  spent the majority of  his  closing argument reiterating  his  position on why the Orwellian-named net neutrality rules â which essentially implemented federal oversight of the internet under Title II regulations created in the 1930s to manage the Ma Bell telephone monopoly â had been an Obama administration mistake.
Prior to 2015 when net neutrality was implemented  the internet was regulated under what  Pai  is fond of calling a âlight-touch frameworkâ; simply put  the federal government had less regulatory oversight which allowed internet service providers and tech companies the ability to invest and innovate. Thatâs why the internet is as robust and efficient as it is.
 Pai  said the net neutrality rules were âexpress ordersâ from the Obama White House to the FCC  and led to less innovation and investment in the internet framework for the last two years  citing several specific examples. The environment that allowed the internet to thrive before the Obama-era rules âwasnât heavy-handedâ¦regulation â  Pai  said  which led to the $1.5 trillion investment in internet services and networks that gave America unfettered access.
 He  also noted  in contradiction to dissenting Democrat commissioners Jessica Rosenworcel and Mignon Clyburn (who delivered a nearly 20 minute âeulogyâ to net neutrality)  that people who complain about the internet donât complain about Internet Service Providers (ISPs) potentially blocking or throttling content  or that they might discriminate against Internet traffic of their competitors. Instead they complain that thereâs not enough choice regarding ISPs and that they might have no access at.
 Pai  noted that a lighter touch regulatory environment  where ISPs are free to start up and innovate  would address both of those problem.
In short   Pai  said the decision to overturn net neutrality âis not going to destroy the internetâ¦is not going to kill democracy  [and] is not going to stifle free expression online.â
[EX A]:
yes