In this task, you must classify if a given review is positive/negative, indicating your answer as P or N.

Example Input: the scene at the end of 1989 's ` dead poets society , ' when robin williams ' english students stand up on their desk and say , ` captain , my captain , ' gets me every time .
unfortunately , the court room scene near the end of robin 's newest film , ` patch adams , ' does n't have anywhere near the same impact .
from the surface ` patch adams ' looks very promising .
it 's a story about a not so young man , patch adams ( robin williams ) , who finds meaning in his life through helping sick people .
when the film opens , we find patch , depressed and suicidal , checking himself into a mental hospital .
in a few scenes , strongly reminiscent of ` one flew over the cuckoo 's nest , ' he ends up helping the patients through their problems ; and it 's here that he finds how much he loves working with people .
so he checks himself out of the hospital , and heads straight to medical school .
right from the start , patch uses comedy to help make the patient more comfortable .
he continuously breaks medical tradition and makes the dean of the school angry .
shortly after joining medical school , he meets and falls in love with carin ( monica potter ) .
they , along with patch 's dork friend , truman ( daniel london ) , start a medical clinic for uninsured people .
once the dean catches wind of the clinic , he tells patch he ca n't graduate and kicks him out of school .
patch , like what any true american would do , takes the school to court .
it 's here where the not so climatic court room battle takes place , over whether or not patch can become a real doctor .
i have never seen a movie with some potential
just completely blow it .
it seems more like a series of short sketches , rather than a full - length movie .
considering it runs almost two hours , much too long for such a light film , it could have flowed much smoother .
not to mention the fact of how serious the film takes itself , and manages to cover all the cliches of bad melodrama .
robin williams saves the film from being abysmal with several comic scenes that elevate the movie to entertaining and worthwhile levels .
but those moments are rare and in the end ` patch adams ' is barely average .
Example Output: N

Example Input: much ado about nothing .
ah , how sweet the irony !
it 's accepted wisdom in some circles - among english literature nuts , mainly - that whenever a critic knocks shakespeare they are only doing so through ignorance .
he just does n't " understand " shakespeare , you will hear them say .
the bard 's work is apparently beyond criticism .
what a load of old cobblers .
if these arbiters of public taste think kenneth branaugh 's film of shakespeare 's " comedy " much ado about nothing is comedy in any modern sense of the word
, it 's time to get a life .
get monty python .
get woody allen .
get john waters .
whatever .
just get a real taste of some clever , witty , risky comedy . and banish this nonsense
to where it belongs .
drama and tragedy was shakespeare 's strength .
to my sensibilities - and i 'm no stick in the mud - much ado about nothing resonates with no spark whatsoever .
no kidding : this film ranks among the most embarrassing two hours i have ever spent in a cinema in my 20 years of movie going .
the only thing that stopped me walking out was loyalty to my lady friend , as this was our day out
and i had n't seen her in ages .
but boy , does she owe me one !
i wo n't spend too much time on the plot .
basically , we follow the trials and tribulations of two would - be couples - one young , the other older .
there 's some dark treachery amongst all this , but everyone is so awfully jolly that you 'd hardly know it .
mind you , there 's nothing wrong with the basic story .
good romantic comedies based on similar premises abound .
nothing wrong with most of the cast , either .
branaugh , emma thompson and denzel washington are all talented performers .
the problem is the script , or more accurately , shakespeare 's original text .
light comedy should n't be complex .
yet wrapped in elizabethan english , the dialogue becomes difficult to comprehend .
for this alone it will be a problem for modern audiences unschooled in shakespeare and in search of nothing more than a good , undemanding laugh .
the only laughs to escape my belly were brought on by the gloriously inept performance of keanu reeves , the actor once again miscast as a jealous half - brother or something .
but when dissected and understood , what it all boils down to is that this stuff is just so goddamn lame .
this is comedy so clean and nice and corny and so devoid of danger that it leaves this viewer
totally cold .
ho , ho ,
ho ,
boy likes girl !
ho ,
ho ,
ho , men are such klutzes !
ho ,
ho ,
ho ,
she 's so awfully clumsy !
oh please !
there 's wit in here somewhere , i 'm told .
i call it pretentious
.
something lightweight striving to be something sophisticated through clever wordplay .
in the end , it 's cringeworthy .
watching some of the cinema patrons around me collapse with laughter made much ado about nothing a very weird movie going experience .
comedy ?
bah , humbug !
Example Output: N

Example Input: capsule : side - splitting comedy that follows its own merciless logic almost through to the end . . .
but not without providing a good deal of genuine laughs
.
most comedies these days have one flaw .
they 're not funny .
they think they 're funny , but they are devoid of anything really penetrating or dastardly .
occasionally a good funny movie sneaks past the deadening hollywood preconceptions of humor and we get a real gem : ruthless people , for instance , which established a microcosm of a setup and played it out to the bitter end .
liar liar is built the same way and is just about as funny .
this is one of the few movies i 've seen where i was laughing consistently almost all the way through : instead of a couple of set - pieces that inspired a laugh ( think of the dismal fatal instinct ) , the whole movie works like clockwork .
jim carrey playes a high - powered lawyer , to whom lying is as natural as breathing .
there is one thing he takes seriously , though : his son , and we can sense the affection that they have for each other right away .
but his wife is divorced and seeing another man , and now it looks like they may move away together .
the son goes with them , of course .
the movie sets up this early material with good timing and a remarkable balance of jim carrey 's over - the - top persona with reality .
then the plot springs into action : after being snubbed ( not deliberately ) by his father at his birthday , the kid makes a wish as he blows out the birthday candles : that for just one day , dad ca n't lie .
he gets the wish .
what happens next is sidesplitting .
everything turns into a confrontation : when cornered by a bum for some change , he shouts , " no !
i 'm not giving you any money because i know you 'll spend it on booze !
all i want to do is to get to the office without having to step over the debris of our decaying society !
"
he ca n't even get into an elevator without earning a black eye .
and what 's worse , he 's now gotten himself into an expensive divorce settlement that requires him to twist the truth like abstract wire sculpture .
carrey , who i used to find unfunny , has gotten better at his schtick , even if it 's a limited one .
he uses it to great effect in this movie .
there is a scene where he tries to test his ability to lie and nearly demolishes his office in the process ( there 's a grin breaking out across my face right now , just remembering the scene ) .
he ca n't even write the lie ; his fingers twitch , his body buckles like someone in the throes of cyanide poisoning , and when he tries to talk it 's like he 's speaking in tongues .
equally funny is a scene where he beats himself to a pulp ( do n't ask why ) , tries to drink water to keep from having outbursts in the courtroom ( it fails , with semi - predictable results ) , and winds up biting the bullet when he gets called into the boardroom to have everyone ask what they think of them .
this scene alone may force people to stop the tape for minutes on end .
the movie sustains its laughs and also its flashes of insight until almost the end .
a shame , too , because the movie insists on having a big , ridiculous climax that involves carrey 's character flagging down a plane using a set of motorized stairs , then breaking his leg , etc .
a simple reconciliation would do the trick .
why is this stupid pent - up climax always obligatory ?
it 's not even part of the movie 's real agenda .
thankfully , liar liar survives it , and so does carrey .
maybe they were being merciful , on reflection .
if i 'd laughed any more , i might have needed an iron lung .
Example Output:
P