In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.
--------
Question: Sentence: Bill passed the half-empty plate to John because he was hungry.
 Reason: The 'he' refers to john because john was very hungry so that bill passed the half empty plate. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

Answer: Correct


Question: Sentence: Jane knocked on Susan's door, but there was no answer. She was disappointed.
 Reason: The 'She' refers to jane because Jane was the one that got no answer at the door so it's logical she was disappointed. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

Answer: Correct


Question: Sentence: I put the butterfly wing on the table and it broke.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the butterfly wing because If the books were the heavy ones it's unlikely that it's the one that broke. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

Answer:
Wrong