The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the uv-part strategy, otherwise output No. uv-part is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to undermine the requirements of the opponent. For instance, suggesting that the opponent would not need more firewood since they already have the basic supplies or a suggestion that there might be a store near the campsite where the opponent can get the supplies instead.

Ex Input:
Context: 'There is no point in walk away. This deal should be done mutually and beneficial for both. So its better I will take 2 food packages, you can take 1 food package, 2 water and 3 fire wood .Hope this will definitely work for you.' 'No i absolutely need 2 food packages and 1 water. How about we do it like this... You take 1 food package, 2 waters and 2 firewoods. Does that work for you?' 'Sorry to bother you, I don't need anything other than food package. So better you could give me 2 food package and take 3 water and fire wood. Please consider this deal.'
Utterance: 'No i absolutely need 2 food packages. So if you cannot agree to take 1 food 2 water and 2 firewood i will walk away.  If you have children with you would would also need water which you are not asking for. '

Ex Output:
Yes


Ex Input:
Context: 'I don't want to be too hungry either but I think perhaps I might need an extra water to compensate for the lack of food.' 'Since I am giving you all of the firewood that you said was most important to you, I feel I should get at least the same amount of items as you, especially since you are getting exactly the firewood you want. I will need to stick to three waters and two food.' 'The firewood is most important to me to be sure. However, if you get more food and all of the water I could end up going hungry.☹️'
Utterance: 'Well I would be happy to exchange you one of your firewood for the one water you need. That way you won't go thirsty.'

Ex Output:
Yes


Ex Input:
Context: 'I would like 2' 'I will  be happy to let you have 3 packs of food , but I need 2 packs of firewood' 'I am also letting you have all 3 packs of water. I think we need to consider how to split the firewood in a fair manner.'
Utterance: 'What do you think is  a fair deal with the firewood'

Ex Output:

No