TASK DEFINITION: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.
PROBLEM: Comment: Just because they fly them, or should I say 'have a committment to fly them', doesn't mean they are the best choice today.  And besides, of all the countries you list, Australia, Canada, Britain and many others have all bailed. It is an expensive piece of junk that would get shot down in droves using the scenarios that they envisioned for it. Besides, we have no F-22's to provide air cover AND how would you ever install specialized hangers and DC generators in Canada's climate. That, and the exploding fuel tanks. As for the USN, they have flown (1), ONE F-35 off of a carrier. Big hairy deal. Are you even aware of the 'factoid' that both the Russian and Chinese radars can pick these slow moving beasts up 160 KM out from their missile sites (i.e S-400)? Expensive, full of flaws, impossible to maintain without selling the Province of British Columbia to raise cash, and obsolete before they even roll out.

Methinks you are an industry mule.

SOLUTION: Non-sexual-explicit

PROBLEM: Comment: By "Impulse control," I presume you mean masturbation. Please know that folks masturbating to porn at the library is a matter of daily routine.

SOLUTION: Sexual-explicit

PROBLEM: Comment: Aloha IBrakeForBirds!

According to HHS, who does the contract killing for the City and County it costs them around $72 to catch and kill.  That may be more today.

When you catch and kill a cat you do not slow down the reproduction rate.  You increase it.  The colony will reproduce at a faster rate.  If you return neutered cats into the colony the reproduction rates decrease.  It's simple biology.

SOLUTION:
Non-sexual-explicit