In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine the neutral choice based on your inference from the statement and your commonsense knowledge. The neutral choice is a sentence that neither agrees nor disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3', corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence. If sentence X agrees with sentence Y, one's correctness follows from the other one. If sentence X disagrees with sentence Y, they can not be correct at the same time.

Q: Statement: The truth of the matter was that it was Lawrence who had murdered Alfred Inglethorp with a croquet 114 mallet.  Choices: 1. Nobody knows who murdered Mr. Inglethorp. 2. Alfred Inglethorp was murdrered by Lawrence with a croquet mallet. 3. Lawrence owned the croquet mallet used to murder Alfred Inglethorp.

A: 3
****
Q: Statement: and that's that's in a year that's uh what would you do with all that money Choices: 1. That's a small quantity of money. 2. What would you do with all that money? A million dollars is a lot. 3. That's in a year. What would you do with all that money?

A: 2
****
Q: Statement: Good cause existed for dispensing with the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking procedures of the Administrative Procedure Act and has issued the rule as an interim final rule with a request for comments by April 14, 1997. Choices: 1. The Act allowed for better rulemaking in the state. 2. The Act was the cause of the final rule. 3. The final rule came into effect in 1998.

A:
1
****