In this task, you will be shown a sentence, and you should determine whether it is overruling or non-overruling. In law, an overruling sentence is a statement that nullifies a previous case decision as a precedent by a constitutionally valid statute or a decision by the same or higher ranking court which establishes a different rule on the point of law involved. Classify your answers into overruling or non-overruling

Q: ##note: r.j. reynolds tobacco co. v. ciccone is the current case that is being dealt with, therefore it is not being overruled.

A: overruling
****
Q: see tex. code crim. proc. ann. art. 38.23 (west 2005) (providing that no evidence obtained in violation of constitution shall be admitted against accused and that ""[i]n any case where the legal evidence raises an issue hereunder, the jury shall be instructed that if it believes, or has a reasonable doubt, that the evidence was obtained in violation of the provisions of this article, then and in such event, the jury shall disregard any such evidence so obtained"").

A: non-overruling
****
Q: thus, boswell and cruse have been, at best, outlying cases concerning the effect of "as is" clauses in agreements involving the sale of used real property, and we overrule boswell and cruse to the extent that they stand for a proposition different than that expressed in clay kilgore constr., nesbitt, moore, leatherwood, haygood, o'connor, and massey.

A:
overruling
****