In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Q: Comment: You are all of you so stupid. Where was the dog? The dog was on his owners property. The shooter broke the law, the shooter was not in danger. The shooter aimed at a sitting still dog. The dog had a shock collar that kept it inside the property. The shooter should be charged with destruction of property, harassment, and unlawful discharge of a weapon in city limits. Throw the GOD DAMN BOOK AT HIM!

A: Obscene
****
Q: Comment: Jones has no "style", just rant.

If Coulter modified her style, she'd be taken more seriously by what some would call Mainstream people presumably those giving "funnies" here--and with a good degree of validity. She makes some great observations about her country, its policies and people. Trouble is, she does it with a sledge-hammer.

A: Non-obscene
****
Q: Comment: Yes  indeed, withholding donations is the best and only way to get the bishops/Vatican to pay attention. Because the bottom line is it's all about the bloody money -forget about 'saving souls' -they could care less. The Charlotte diocese tends to be rather right wing and monied from my experience with visiting there. The huge St. Mathews church is like a mega church - the pastor is very condescending and gives terrible homilies.  He has a captive audience as churches are so spread out. The audience consists of transplanted Northerners for the most part. Plus they have a school so everyone sends their children there as it is very much in vogue to do so.

A:
Non-obscene
****