In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: threat and non-threat. Threat is a statement that someone will be hurt or harmed, especially if the person does not do something in particular.

[EX Q]: Comment: As long as there's free food and generous gov't handouts, you'll have the dredge of the community taking advantage.  Too lazy to work menial but honest jobs, too dumb to find a good job, but smart enough to take advantage of freebees.  Cut the entitlements for these healthy but lazy bums.  Let them starve, no one will miss them.
[EX A]: Threat

[EX Q]: Comment: Yay for the Brits!  But...does this mean bishops, school boards and administrators will not demand wretched contracts for teachers and other staff that are carefully worded to exclude LGBT teachers, such as are in effect in the US?  If yes, double-yay for the Brits; if not, I see yet another layer of hypocrisy.
[EX A]: Non-threat

[EX Q]: Comment: ADN has a lot of nerve attempting to associate themselves with journalism.  The reporting is shallow, liberal and weak minded.  The news consumers will eventually see this rag for what is is and stop buying their junk.  Personally, I wish ADN would just die, just go to hell and die.
[EX A]:
Threat