We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

[EX Q]: As Dieter and other death penalty opponents make no distinction between the actually innocent and the legally innocent, why don't they claim that over 2500 innocents have been "exonerated" from death row?
[EX A]: Valid

[EX Q]: i am not saying that by having one is the only determinate of clearing a suspect, ex a person has the right not to incriminate themselves, i.e. they were robbing a bank.
[EX A]: Invalid

[EX Q]: If we don't stop the death penalty now, we will put innocent people to death while we try to fix the problems.
[EX A]:
Valid