In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence can be inferred from the statement. Incorrect choices change the meaning in important ways or have details that are not mentioned in the statement. Indicate your answer as 1,2, or 3 corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.
--------
Question: Statement: Participants raised questions about whether the SEC should reconsider the amount and targeting of its civil sanctions and more frequently use other types of remedies, such as criminal sanctions, to hold people accountable for wrongdoing. Choices:  1. Participants believe candles will be a great remedy for criminals. 2. Participants asked questions about different ways to hold criminals accountable for wrongdoing.  3. Participants asked many questions about the death penalty. 

Answer: 2


Question: Statement: so you know they i i know that's bad but you know the just like Texas now Choices:  1. If one state does it, maybe it will work for other states. 2. I know it's bad, but Texas already does it.  3. We can't base anything one one state.

Answer: 2


Question: Statement: Oh--A mook is kind of like a gavone, which is kind of like an Italian schmuck. Choices:  1. An Italian schmuck is like a gavone. 2. A mook is very similar to an Italian schmuck. 3. A gavone is nothing like a mook.

Answer:
1