We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Input: Consider Input: Sent1: sure you can kill with other things, but most homicide weapons are guns.
 Sent2: You somehow seem to think that getting rid of guns will stop people from killing each other.

Output: Not similar


Input: Consider Input: Sent1: But gun hater pilot will demand that the right to bear arms be limited or banned to keep criminals from getting guns.
 Sent2: A gun haters is a person that wants gun control laws that infringe on the right to bear arms or wants to ban the right to bear arms.

Output: Similar


Input: Consider Input: Sent1: The problem is that widespread guns means greater criminal access to guns which means greater criminal gun use which means bad things.
 Sent2: Finally it mentions that Swiss "gun control" is not the reason for the low crime rates and, granted, it also mentions that this system is not proof that more guns means less crime.


Output: Not similar