TASK DEFINITION: In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence can be inferred from the statement. Incorrect choices change the meaning in important ways or have details that are not mentioned in the statement. Indicate your answer as 1,2, or 3 corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.
PROBLEM: Statement: Its dramatic location, looking acroseto the Lub??ron from the southern edge of the Vaucluse plateau, has made Gordes one of the most proserous villages in the region, popular for its boutiques and little galleries. Choices:  1. The village Gordes is on the northern edge of the Vaucluse plateau. 2. The village Gordes is popular for its small galleries and boutiques. 3. The boutiques in the village Gordes contain various souvenirs for tourists.

SOLUTION: 2

PROBLEM: Statement: When you hear that despite the fact that he has economists who know better, the Justice Department's Joel Klein apparently either believes or chooses to claim that this case is about path dependence, you start to wonder. Choices:  1. Joel Klein is lying about the case, and it's obvious why. 2. Joel Klein's claim that the case is about path dependence is fully backed up by his economists. 3. Joel Klein says that this case is about path dependence, even though the economists who work for him know that isn't true.

SOLUTION: 3

PROBLEM: Statement: For example, suppose a study estimates that the average WTP for a reduction in mortality risk of 1/100,000 is $50, but that the actual mortality risk reduction resulting from a given pollutant reduction is 1/10,000. Choices:  1. Studies might under estimate mortality rates because secondary effects of the pollutants may not be accounted for. 2. Studies can always accurately estimate reductions in mortality rates. 3. If could be estimated that a reduction in mortality risk of 1/100,000 is $50, but the actual reduction may vary.

SOLUTION:
3