We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gay Marriage) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gay marriage. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gay marriage.

[Q]: That could be extended even to say that I don't think promoting specifically male/female monogamy is a good thing because it implies that same-sex monogamy is not a good thing.
[A]: Valid


[Q]: And you say gays are entitled to every privilege the rest of us are and then you suggest that being gay would negatively effect the "values" of a child, so that shouldn't be allowed.
[A]: Valid


[Q]: One valid study would be a comparison of sexual fidelity between married male hetrosexuals and male homosexuals in legally recognized marriges.
[A]:
Valid