instruction:
The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the uv-part strategy, otherwise output No. uv-part is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to undermine the requirements of the opponent. For instance, suggesting that the opponent would not need more firewood since they already have the basic supplies or a suggestion that there might be a store near the campsite where the opponent can get the supplies instead.
question:
Context: 'I was thinking we can say which ones we want more? Or depending on where we are camping and our camping abilities, we might need some materials more over others' 'That sounds good to me!  I heard where we are going it is going to be really cold the next couple of nights so we definitely need extra firewood.  We also have a pretty big group so extra food and water would come in handy too.  So how about I take 2 of the extra firewood, 1 extra water and 2 extra food?' 'Oh we have a substantial group as well, one of which is newly pregnant. Since we could find firewood ourselves, how about you take 2 firewood, 1 water, 1 food? '
Utterance: 'We could really use that extra water and food, maybe you would be interested a little bit more firewood?  How about I take 1 firewood, 2 water, and 2 food?  I've got a big group of guys to feed.'
answer:
Yes


question:
Context: 'Great! I'll be going to the Catskills, in NY. Where are you planning on going?' 'Antarctica! I am going to need as much firewood as I can get.' 'Ha, woah that's exotic! I'll need some firewood as well, but maybe not as much as you! I'm planning on going hiking a lot, and will need some extra water, as, again, ill be hiking a lot'
Utterance: 'I will offer 3 water to you! You will maybe need more food with that much exercise? How about 2 food? I really need that extra firewood. Remember that the Catskills probably has some extra wood around.'
answer:
Yes


question:
Context: 'Hello there. I am as well. What items were you looking for specifically?🙂' 'I am looking for one of each. Food I am especially looking for.' 'That sounds pretty reasonable as I am in need of firewood the most. Would it be most reasonable to each take what we need most and split the water down the middle?'
Utterance: 'Yes, it would.'
answer:

No