Categorize the comment on the basis of obscenity. If the comment is obscene output Yes, otherwise output No.

Ex Input:
:)  It comes with the territory.  Mud-slinging always occurs when truth outweighs myth.

Ex Output:
No


Ex Input:
A critique of Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump from a member of the BOD of Americans for Democratic Action may  be driven by bias upon a Republican presidential candidate.  The millions, including many Democrats themselves,  are attracted to Trump because of  the issues he proposes which affect the quality of life and the security of this nation.

Ex Output:
No


Ex Input:
They are cutting state employees. Remember, though, that those employees provide a service. Likely there were too many employees but the real problem is that there are way too many high-paid administrators. You could hire ~8 admins on what they pay one Vice Chancellor at the university, for example. So, for every 8 admins you fire - get rid of a Vice Chancellor and double your impact! As for the benefits that state employees get - they aren't that great for the newer employees. What's killing the state is the ridiculously generous benefits they gave to Tier I employees. Excellent retirement and 100% healthcare for the rest of their lives! You want a new nose - go get one, no problem. Finally, putting overly expensive speaker systems in classrooms isn't because teachers can't speak up - its because our school districts fall in love with every new technological gadget. The problem is the administration; and they are not going to cut themselves until they've decimated the workforce.

Ex Output:

No