In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

Q: Comment: Actually, with the "leaks" coming from his team of leakers, Comey comes across as a weakling, not an egomaniac.

Most notably the "hiding in the drapes" story, where Comey was apparently so aghast at having to shake Trump's hand that he attempted to blend into the Oval Office drapes and not be noticed.

Ridiculous.

We all know what Trump is.

Meanwhile Comey is simply acting like lover's scorned everywhere.

A: Non-identity-attack
****
Q: Comment: Such an absurd comment.  Actually, this will directly benefit affordable projects, because they will pass the savings onto residents, just as occurs with lower utility bills due to conservation.  As for discouragement of larger projects: silly.  The cost increment is so modest per square foot, and the cost benefit so clear, that it will not impede the decision to appropriately scale.

Suggesting this is racist is silliest of all.  Environmental benefit benefits all.  Environmental Equity's a thing, focusing on the obligation of all to provide healthy conditions for all, particularly those most disenfranchised.

But mostly: look at the economics.  This is an unambiguous step forward.

A: Non-identity-attack
****
Q: Comment: You ignore the fundamental hypocrisy of NAACP that solely and exclusively advocate for blacks or "colored people" (the same 19th C. descriptor used in 1909 and continues). The organization has zero to do with any other Americans. The fundamental crux of "inclusion" is to embrace other people. Like Pacific-Islanders? Native Americans? Asian-Americans? Hispanic/Latinos? Bi-racial? Multi-racial? Undesignated? Get the picture? 

Are we talking about income inequality, access to education, job opportunities or the like? Oh, only for "CP"? The U.S. has the lowest social mobility for people in the middle-and-lower economic classes since the first Gilded Age. When the NAACP or La Raza or the like show up for their "exclusivity" we all lose. Tens of millions of Americans are mired in poverty and transgenerational poverty. Good thing we only look at their skin tone. I guess that's why the NAACP has offices on NA Reservations or Guam/ASamoa/PR?

A:
Non-identity-attack
****