In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Ex Input:
Comment: Bloody hell your column should be sucked up by the waste disposal truck. That is all it is worth and stinks just as bad.
No reporter  has ever mentioned the support of the atrocities committed by Batista supported and sanctioned by the U.S. government  Done to protect callous landowners of sugar plantations from their own workers. The States sent in their Marines several times to put down sugar plantation workers.

The U. S. dominated and directed all aspects of life in Cuba from the end of the Spanish War to Castro's overthrow of Batista.. Castro would not take directions from the Americans to put Cuba under American thumbs so they made 20 attempts to kill him.

A doctrine that many, many people over look is the Monroe Doctrine. States basically that only the U. S. can interfere with governments in the Western Hemisphere!

Ex Output:
Obscene


Ex Input:
Comment: WHO GIVES A FUCK

Ex Output:
Obscene


Ex Input:
Comment: Fr Z, Church Militant and other homophobic sites are the reason for this backlash.  So sad, Fr. Martin speaks rightly of the issues and of compassion we as church must have for all of God's children.  Shame that anyway supports the far right mentioned in my first sentence who dare to call themselves Catholics.

Ex Output:

Non-obscene