In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

Q: Comment: They're in prison what else can you do to them? The Latino and black gangs have pretty much the same ideology.

A: Identity-attack
****
Q: Comment: Oh, those 'naughty' BC Liberals! First, Christy shrugs and says, "The BC voters don't care corrupt we are.", then disappears until the whole thing blows over (she hopes). Then her deputy crime boss, Rich Coleman comes out and throws their donors under the bus. If that wasn't bad enough, Suzanne Anton, Attorney General, stands up in QP and throws their lobbyists under the bus.  Who's next?

A: Non-identity-attack
****
Q: Comment: Sure I do  --  there are a million sub-tribes in my race, and you better believe I know which ones I do and don't belong to.  But I would also not call someone a redneck or a dumb Polack, even though I might think it.  Turns out, even blondes find blonde jokes hurtful  --  so I'm more careful with those than I used to be, too.

If that's what you meant by "subtitle judge and slander," that is.

A:
Non-identity-attack
****