Categorize the comment on the basis of toxicity. If the comment is toxic (harmful, malicious, derogatory, threat, insult, identity attck, etc.) output Yes, otherwise output No.

Input: Consider Input: The writer shouldn't feel too sorry for Chile because they turned against their home-grown socialist problem in the 1970s, rather than become another technological and economic backwater like Cuba.  Today Chile is arguably one of the best-run countries in the western hemisphere, economically and politically.  Arguably they are even more 'progressive' than the USA - after all, they have already elected a woman president!  ;-)

Chile is not a 'third-world' country by any stretch of the imagination, despite what the writer of this letter implies.

Output: No


Input: Consider Input: That is only a fraction of the story! Please try to keep up! In addition, millions of people owe the government money...hell the government even owes the government money. They resulted in a standoff to try to get the attention of the people to understand, in order to bring some real justice, results and closure to the whole ordeal. The BLM did not have to result in blood shed and jail. The Ranchers did NOT hurt anyone!!! They just want to continue the hard work that they do to make a living. The government could have done what they wanted to do on that land and left the cattle alone, but they didn't really want anyone to know their real intention/reason...well the cat is out of the bag, so to speak.

Output: No


Input: Consider Input: Scratch any leftist and you'll find a wannabe Comrade Strelnikov fantasizing about commanding his armored train and brigade of Cossack seeking out the bitter clingers.   The left has a highly developed taste for dictatorships; that republican democracy stuff is so inconvenient for people whose consciousness has been raised.


Output: No