TASK DEFINITION: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.
PROBLEM: Comment: I'll tell you how I handle that, RN psych nurse, 31 years active Air Force and Air National Guard, 22 years as a nurse, multiple deployments.  First Egyptian born munitions specialist in Air Force history.  You really think I voted for a draft dodger civilian fool who doesn't know his but from a hole in the ground?

SOLUTION: Non-obscene

PROBLEM: Comment: I'd like to share a comment written in response to the article "Clarity beyond clericalism: Bishop Long at the Royal Commission" published in the Australian on-line journal "Eureka Street." The article elicited this response from one reader, who referred to Catholic schools:

"If there were a significant risk of abuse, then enrolments would have fallen off dramatically. They haven't... so I conclude this is a witch-hunt...and not a realistic assessment of any widespread problem."

To describe Australia's Royal Commission into Institutional Child Sexual Abuse as an unrealistic "witch-hunt" addressing a manufactured problem sounds bizarre to me.  However, this commentator is not alone; there are others.

Those of us who believe Church reform is sine qua non need to be talking to these folks.  Conversation can be a slow process, but if there is no meeting of minds, no willingness to listen, we're dead in the water.

SOLUTION: Non-obscene

PROBLEM: Comment: Here is another one of Zuma's appointees who should be given the chop. She is totally incompetent and cannot see the whole picture nor understand the financial implications of her incompetence. I am not sure she understands what a budget is, what planning-financial or otherwise is, or SASSA would not be in the position it is in. Also one would like to see an inquiry into her own personal finances to ascertain how much she has received, along with Zuma, from the gravy train of corruption

SOLUTION:
Non-obscene