In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: insult and non-insult. Insult is any lanugage or act that is disrespectful or scornfully abusive.

Input: Consider Input: Comment: That the victim 'deserved' killing is not a viable argument in Oregon.   

H. L Mencken's position regarding government officials does have some followers, though.

"I propose that it shall be no longer malum in se for a citizen to pummel, cowhide, kick, gouge, cut, wound, bruise, maim, burn, club, bastinado, flay, or even lynch a [government] jobholder, and that it shall be malum prohibitum only to the extent that the punishment exceeds the jobholder’s deserts. The amount of this excess, if any, may be determined very conveniently by a petit jury, as other questions of guilt are now determined."

"If it decides that the jobholder deserves the punishment inflicted upon him, the citizen who inflicted it is acquitted with honor."

There are governmental job and office holders.....

Output: Non-insult


Input: Consider Input: Comment: Very clever.  ha ha

Is there a rally for those of us that are pro-immigration but want it done properly?  We'd need a large venue, 'cuz there's a lot of us.

The debacle of the Haitian illegal migrants seeking asylum (queue-jumping, really) is an black eye to our national immigration policy.  The government's response has been beyond inadequate; it's actually enabling more of it.   Immigration is good, but not this way.  

Where do I report to with my sign?   Don't worry, we'll be peaceful.  After all, we're Canadians, and Canadians value the rule of law.

Output: Non-insult


Input: Consider Input: Comment: Mexico is nothing.  Remember that cow that jumped over the moon?


Output: Non-insult