instruction:
The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.
question:
Context: 'We're really going to need that extra firewood.  We'll need the heat source, but also for cooking.  It a big deal that I get the extra wood, I hope you will understand why I need it.' 'my people feel like they need 1 extra of something or else they will throw a fit ☹️' 'No fits!!  They're getting that extra water they really want.  I am sure they'll be OK with giving a group with kids a little extra firewood to make this camping trip awesome for them'
Utterance: 'Okay if they get 3 water they are good with that allotment for the others'
answer:
Yes


question:
Context: 'In that case, I would be fine trading the extra food for a water. so you would get 2 waters and 2 foods ' 'Hmm, that works for me. So basically, you get 1 food, 1 water, and 2 firewood? I get 2, 2, and 0. If that's right, I agree.' 'Yea, so that about right, but i get 3 firewoods'
Utterance: 'Oh, yeah, sorry, mistyped that. Okay, let's do it then. Was good talking.'
answer:
No


question:
Context: 'I need the food and water.  You can have all the firewood.'
Utterance: 'hello how are you?  I need the food the most because I ran off and left mine sitting on my kitchen counter.  I think we can agree upon you having 2 water but I need 2 food'
answer:

No