In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

[EX Q]: Comment: It'll be interesting to see how this plays out.  In a rational world, owners/stockholders/league would have promptly and ruthlessly enforced a "no politics on the playing field" rule, left or right.  They didn't, and now they're pointedly choosing sides.  I suspect, they should've taken a hard look at an electoral map first.  They need Trump supporters, far more than Trump supporters need them.  Pro sports is business and entertainment, first and last.  First rule...don't alienate your customers.  Second rule...don't start crap, where there doesn't need to be crap.  They're failing at both rules.
[EX A]: Obscene

[EX Q]: Comment: Any income they receive from their "story" should go towards the cost of rescue from their fraudulent experience.
[EX A]: Non-obscene

[EX Q]: Comment: Just glad that we have a competitive race for Gov.   Often we would get uncontested or weak challengers. 
Quiet and Ineffective does not cut it in this day and age.  Perhaps our Gov will become a one term wonder like his predecessor?
[EX A]:
Non-obscene