In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: insult and non-insult. Insult is any lanugage or act that is disrespectful or scornfully abusive.

Comment: L2G, I have scratched my head over the photo of a woman with her dog.  I don't remember posting that and I am sure that was someone else.  As I said, there are some other jjp58's out there, and some of them post a whole lot.
Non-insult

Comment: Trump's an idiot trying to fool non-idiots.
Insult

Comment: Four dogs tested positive.   How many of Seavey's dogs were tested? It seems  four were test and all four tested positive.  How many of Seavey's remaining dogs were also positive? We will never know.  
If it was sabotage it was done to perfection or the random pick of four dogs would not have all been positive.  We will never know if the saboteur only chose Seavey as his  intended victim or  if they tainted many other teams. None of which tested positive. There seems to be little claims that testing was flawed. Except for those who chose to always believe in conspiracies.  

The saddest part of this entire issue is we have many who fault the ITC for doing exactly what they are organized for.  I expect it would not have mattered whose dogs tested positive. The owner would cry foul, the posters would side with them over the ITC and the posters would refuse to accept anything but their own  views over facts. Lets trash all the rules and see the race gone forever.

Non-insult