In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

[Q]: Comment: If the Democrats had any brains they would never "block" a Supreme Court nominee just based on ideology.  If they are not qualified that is one thing but if they are not a left winger that is nonsense.  Maybe the Republicans should then block any leftie from the court who is otherwise qualified.  This kind of stuff is what ruins our entire system and makes people not trust it at all.  We want good judges who are not buried in ideology but can rule on the facts and the law.  How hard is that?  Often, it is much easier than checking a potential ruling against a certain ideology.  Try it!
[A]: Non-sexual-explicit


[Q]: Comment: Pick up a biology book.  "Lust" is just another word for a psycho-physiological response with the end goal of sexual pleasure/orgasm.  It's ok, many people confuse the lustful pleasure of orgasm with love, even as to say "I love you" immediately afterwards.  Now, maybe you mean you love sex; I get that.  I love it too.
[A]: Sexual-explicit


[Q]: Comment: I'm sick. What was he even trying to argue in his defense? She was obviously unconscious, so there's no consensual relations argument to make. His semen was found inside her. He raped her, plain and simple. And I agree, nine years is light.
[A]:
Sexual-explicit