In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence can be inferred from the statement. Incorrect choices change the meaning in important ways or have details that are not mentioned in the statement. Indicate your answer as 1,2, or 3 corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.

Input: Consider Input: Statement: Competition is generally believed to lead to efficiency, be it economic or technical. Choices:  1. Recent events have led people to question whether or not this conventional wisdom is true. 2. Technical efficiency is believed to be one of the results of competition. 3. Technical efficiency but not economic efficiency are the end results of competition.

Output: 2


Input: Consider Input: Statement: Luckily for Mr. Inglethorp, he had been able to produce an unimpeachable alibi.  Choices:  1. Inglethorp invented an excuse that was too good to be true. 2. Inglethorp was a shrewd man, with lying being one of his specialties. 3. The alibi was quickly cracked and disregarded, leaving Inglethorped forked.

Output: 1


Input: Consider Input: Statement: As Jared Hohlt  in Slate , the comedian got sick at the point where he needed to reinvent himself to keep from sinking into obscurity. Choices:  1. The comedian was able to pull himself into a healthy state when he needed to. 2. The comedian has suffered many existential crises' and facing a lot of anxiety. 3. The comedian got sick when he needed to change himself.


Output: 3