We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

Example Input: Even though he says he's neither in the collective or individual column he is clearly in the collective column simply by suggesting that the right to bear arms requires you to be in the militia (which SCOTUS disagrees with.)
Example Output: Valid

Example Input: We didn't ban all guns, just most of them, because our farmers need them and our police need them.
Example Output: Valid

Example Input: Heck, in the UK cops used to only carry clubs, now they carry guns, body armour, and are not allowed to patrol alone.
Example Output:
Valid