We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

Ex Input:
Chick-A-Filet does not prohibit anyone nor deny them service, the minority public and a couple of mayors are trying to foist their prejudice on the company to make them adopt their opposing viewpoint and that is unConstitutional.

Ex Output:
Valid


Ex Input:
The medium of 'free speech' has changed, but that does not affect that free speech should still exist - just as with the other constitutional points (with a few exceptions, if you believe Bush).

Ex Output:
Valid


Ex Input:
Americans used guns initially as tools for individual self-protection and hunting, but by the time of the American Revolution, firearms became symbols of citizenship, intimately tied to defending political rights.

Ex Output:

Valid