We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

Input: Consider Input: Whether or not government should be dipping its fingers into matters concerning insurance records is a separate matter from government maintaining independent databases of private information.

Output: Valid


Input: Consider Input: I can understand your belief that gun control won't work and that owning guns is a good thing, I don't agree with it, but is hardly beyond comprehension.

Output: Valid


Input: Consider Input: Is there any justification for preventing people with no criminal record from acquiring post-'86 models, when the pre-'86 models aren't being used for committing crimes?


Output: Valid