Given a paragraph about cooking, and a set of conversational questions and answers about the paragraph, say whether the passage contains sufficient information to answer the follow-up question. Say Yes if it is answerable; otherwise, say No. The paragraph has the prefix 'CONTEXT:'. Each conversation question has a prefix `Q:` followed by the answer prefix `A:`, and the follow-up question has a prefix `FOLLOWUP_Q:`.

Input: Consider Input: CONTEXT: Can't comment on the nutritional side of things, but the main reason I can think of for not always including it is that it has a slightly different flavour. A much more intense lemon flavour is provided by the zest while the juice has the more tart elements (and of course water).If you're just interested in avoiding waste, you can freeze the zest.  <sep>  Q: Are there any reasons not to include the zest when citrus juice is an ingredient? A: Can't comment on the nutritional side of things, but the main reason I can think of for not always including it is that it has a slightly different flavour  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: What can I do to avoid so much waste?

Output: Yes


Input: Consider Input: CONTEXT: Sous vide cooking is a function of temperature and the surface area to volume ratio of the food in question.If you have a high surface area to volume the cooking time will be shorter. Steaks would have a higher ratio than the roast so they would take less time than the roast. The amount of the time difference is difficult to predict exactly over such a long time scale, but a rough calculation of the ratio I spoke of would be a good starting point for a compensation factor.If you have the time and your water bath can accommodate, I'd suggest keeping the roast whole and finishing in a skillet. It's much more impressive than a steak.  <sep>  Q: Sous vide chuck roast or chuck steaks? A: Sous vide cooking is a function of temperature and the surface area to volume ratio of the food in question  Q: I've never cooked sous vide before, but am now equipped to try thanks to the holidays.###We have a 3 pound chuck roast. I'm not sure what the exact cut shape is, but it's vaguely cube shaped A: Steaks would have a higher ratio than the roast so they would take less time than the roast  Q: If we cut the roast into steaks (1-2 inches thick) before bagging and cooking, A: I'd suggest keeping the roast whole and finishing in a skillet. It's much more impressive than a steak  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: i understand.###what effect would this have on the cooking time and/or quality?

Output: Yes


Input: Consider Input: CONTEXT: Apparently the chicken haddie plant had fire damage and we have not been able to buy it for over a year now in New Brunswick, Canada. I too grew up with it for making the best fish cakes. Anyway, the plant is up and running again as of January 2012 and I've been buying at Sobeys.  <sep>  Q: Are chicken haddies still available? A: the plant is up and running again as of January 2012  Q: Where exactly is it located? A: New Brunswick, Canada  Q: Do you know exactly what companie?###companies*? A: I've been buying at Sobeys  Q: Do you get good ones over there? A: I too grew up with it for making the best fish cakes  Q: Have you ever tried its chowder? A: we have not been able to buy it for over a year now  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: What exactly do you like about chicken haddies?


Output: No