In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

Q: Comment: "No gentleman should ever do that, even if he is inebriated as well"
This is just one example of the kinds of comments one reads about such things 
So, what is wanted then is a double standard: 
SHE isn't responsible enough to give consent because she's drunk, but HE is still expected to be responsible .enough to be a gentleman EVEN when drunk.

THIS is the crux of the problem; Fuzzy logic, weighted automatically in the woman's favour, is what we get non-stop in article after article, and comment after comment - allowing her to claim no responsibility but insisting that the man must always be responsible no matter HOW drunk he is.

Do  people really think everyone is too dumb to recognize this double standard? Shame on those who use it, , and shame on those who go along with it!

A: Non-identity-attack
****
Q: Comment: LOL!  You Trumpistas are something else.  Wasn't it that long ago you were saying how great the economy has been doing since your hero got elected?  And now you're saying the economy is doing poorly in order to justify the nonsense exhibited by this administration?  Hilarious!

Also, these 'dreamers' are people who've been looking for a better life and now that's being taken away without any remedy to address their status beyond deportation at this point.  The U.S is a nation not unlike Canada whose very foundation has been immigration so to suggest that 'actual citizens,' who were immigrants too at one point, should be allowed to dream as well is a rational for this reeks of hypocrisy.

A: Non-identity-attack
****
Q: Comment: Trump needs an external threat too. He uses fear and anger to manipulate the masses.

A:
Non-identity-attack
****