Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.

Ex Input:
they claimed to have proof they were chemically poisoned, their proof was thorough debunked through unbiased studies of the water source they claimed to have inflected them. that you are incpale of addressing this fact and keep spamming my post with your ridiculous nonsense, well, you can be a troll online if you want. your choice, but the bottom line is, these shameless liberal liars were busted lying, and their evidence they tainted was busted as well. run along troll,

Ex Output:
Yes


Ex Input:
For once the court shows some common sense in an aircraft crash. Usually the big pockets, In this case Cessna and Continental are made to pay out money for the negligence of the operator.

Preston Cavner should have been charged with manslaughter for the death of his son and attempted manslaughter for the others injured in the crash. The fact he was never charged with this crime itself is an indictment of the criminal system.

There is no excuse for intentionally overloading an aircraft which is exactly what he did and got a four year old, his own son killed because of it. The burns from the crash the other victims suffered justify the attempted murder charge.

Ex Output:
Yes


Ex Input:
Not letting fire fighters cross his property to fight a wild fire or put out hot spots puts other people and their property in danger.

Ex Output:

No