The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the self-need strategy, otherwise output No. self-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to create a personal need for an item in the negotiation, such as by pointing out that the participant sweats a lot to show preference towards water packages.

[EX Q]: Context: 'Nice. That's okay with me. You get 3 waters and a I get 3 firewood' 'I was actually saying you get 2 firewood and I get 3 waters. Then you could have 2 food and I get 1 food.' 'That's seems fair to me since we all need food to eat'
Utterance: 'Okay, I'm glad we were able to work something out!'
[EX A]: No

[EX Q]: Context: 'Interesting - you're essentially saying that you need the majority of two of the three items. Hmm...' 'Yes, thats all. I need 1/3 food, 2/3 water, and 2/3 firewood.' 'Still not convinced in any way that you need more items in total over me. Please clarify!'
Utterance: 'Food is what I prioritize much more than the others. If you want the majority of the others, I will need all the food.'
[EX A]: No

[EX Q]: Context: 'Hello. 🙂 What item did you need a little extra of?'
Utterance: 'Thank you for asking, I would really like some extra fire wood as I usually get cold and scared at night so I can keep a fire going.'
[EX A]:
Yes