instruction:
Categorize the comment on the basis of severe toxicity. If the comment is severely toxic output Yes, otherwise output No.
question:
We have enough scumbags in Anchorage. Fairbanks can keep theirs.
answer:
Yes


question:
I would agree if we were talking about ancient history, but we're not. The trust issue is current and severe, and the past decisions are recent (and some are current). You and your colleagues may not feel mistrust, but it's pretty clear that a large percentage of the people feel differently.

For the record, I am not opposed to expanding the URD. I'm pretty much on the fence on the issue. I am, however, powerfully concerned that we don't have a city government that can be trusted. If the city decides to break its promise and trust with the people, that is only for the worse for everybody involved, including downtown businesses. It will also increase the opposition to any future city plans.
answer:
No


question:
Hmmm.  The "I'm not running for president." lines sound remarkably similar to his "I'm not running for Speaker of the House." lines from last year.
answer:

No