We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Q: Sent1: Why do people that want what they call reasonable limits on the right to bear arms demand laws that only law abiding citizens will obey?
 Sent2: That most people can't be trusted, so we should have more laws against guns, which most people will abide by because they can be trusted.

A: Similar
****
Q: Sent1: We don't have to choose between total regulation of guns or total denial of the problem of gun crime.
 Sent2: We have more crime than fully armed countries not because we don't have guns.

A: Not similar
****
Q: Sent1: I only support common sense gun control measures, thing such as no guns in schools, no guns on airplanes, background checks for the sale of all firearms, tougher sentences for crimes in which guns are used, etc.
 Sent2: I think laws stating that you should not be allowed to carry guns onto airplanes or into schools are examples of common sense gun control laws meant to protect people.

A:
Similar
****