Given a document and an entity the task is to select the author's sentiment towards the entity. Sentiments can be Positive, Neutral and Negative. Select Positive if the article expresses a positive view towards the given entity or praises its quality or skills. Select Neutral if the document expresses no clear view towards the entity or has equal amounts of positive and negative statements or expressing some fact/quote by someone else. Select Negative if the article expresses a negative view towards like harsh remarks, criticizing entities action/decision etc. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

Ex Input:
What is the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Deval Patrick ? GOVERNOR TURNS UP THE HEAT ON BAKER
 Governor Deval Patrick Wednesday took some of his most pointed shots yet at Republican gubernatorial rival Charles D. Baker Jr.  accusing the former chief executive of Harvard Pilgrim Health Care of doing nothing to stop dramatic increases in health care costs that he said are crushing small businesses and families.
 "Today's events represent a clear example of the choices Massachusetts voters have before them in this election " said the appeal from Patrick's campaign manager  Sydney Asbury. "Governor Patrick and Lieutenant Governor Murray care about working people and take on entrenched and powerful interests on their behalf  while other candidates are either beholden to those interests or too timid to do anything about the problems facing our Commonwealth."
 Patrick's aggressive tack seemed to mark a new  more heated phase of the campaign  on the same day a new poll showed Baker gaining ground on Patrick. Baker's campaign manager  Lenny Alcivar  said on Twitter that Patrick's comments were sad and that the governor had been "reduced from testimony to meltdown  to empty campaign fund-raising ploy in minutes."
 "The governor had 3? years to take action on health care costs  but he didn't " Alcivar said. "For 3? years  Deval Patrick had the existing authority to do something  anything to address this problem  and he wouldn't. Today  hours after waking up to polling results that show his reelection prospects dwindling by the minute  Governor Patrick was forced to testify on a proposal aimed more toward salvaging his political career than helping small businesses."
 Patrick's comments were notable  because he often passes up opportunities to directly engage his challengers  particularly when at the State House.
 But he seized the chance Wednesday  after speaking in support of a bill he filed that would allow state regulators to reject "unreasonable or excessive" cost increases from hospitals and other health care providers.
 "While we've been dealing with this crisis  at least one of the candidates in this race has been in the middle of this industry and hasn't offered any solutions yet " the governor said  taking aim at Baker.
 The Rasmussen Reports automated telephone survey of likely voters showed Patrick earning 35 percent of the vote  compared with 32 percent for Baker and 19 percent for state Treasurer Timothy P. Cahill  who is running as an independent. The poll had a margin of error of plus or minus 4? percentage points. A Rasmussen survey in November showed Patrick at 33 percent  Baker at 28 percent  and Cahill at 25 percent.
 Political analysts said Patrick is trying to more actively define Baker in the minds of voters before Baker can introduce himself on his own terms.
 "Given the Rasmussen poll today essentially showing a dead heat  it's clear that Governor Patrick really has to step up and go on offense more  not only touting what he's done  but go on offense against his real challenger in this race  and that's Charlie Baker " said Mary Anne Marsh  a Democratic political strategist. "It signals a stage in this race  and it shows you we'll see an even more aggressive Deval Patrick going into the spring and the summer."
 The Patrick campaign has been honing two main lines of attack against Baker as it looks toward the November election. One is to tie Baker to the exorbitant cost increases of the Big Dig  whose finances Baker helped oversee as the top budget aide to governors William F. Weld and Paul Cellucci in the 1990s.
 "They talk about why it is they can't help but charge double-digit increases every year to small businesses and families " Patrick said. "Those small business and families don't have a voice at the table. They have my voice at that table."
 Baker's running mate  Senate minority leader Richard R. Tisei  Republican of Wakefield  joined Alcivar in dismissing Patrick's comments as a political ploy. "The governor is really electioneering  instead of taking a more thoughtful approach " he said.

Ex Output:
Neutral


Ex Input:
What is the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Donald J. Trump ? During an MSNBC interview on Saturday morning  Republican National Committee spokesperson Kayleigh McEnany said that the  Trump  White House âstands with women  unmistakably.â
About an hour later   Trump  completely undercut McEnanyâs talking point with a tweet in which  he  defended men accused of sexual assault.
âPeoples lives are being shattered and destroyed by a mere allegation â  Trump  said  alluding to two White House staffers who departed this week amid accusations of domestic assault.
Peoples lives are being shattered and destroyed by a mere allegation. Some are true and some are false. Some are old and some are new. There is no recovery for someone falsely accused â life and career are gone. Is there no such thing any longer as Due Process? â Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) February 10  2018
McEnanyâs MSNBC appearance came the morning after  Trump  praised Rob Porter  the former top White House aide who was publicly accused of domestic abuse by both of his ex-wives this week. Porterâs first wife  Colbie Holderness  provided media outlets with a photo of her with a black eye she said Porter gave her in 2005  while his second  Jennifer Willoughby  said she got a restraining order against Porter after they separated. Apparently   Trump  does not find that evidence persuasive.

Ex Output:
Neutral


Ex Input:
What is the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Philip K. Dick ? Lately  weâve been seeing a boom in TV dystopias. Two of the most successful premieres in the past few years have been HBOâs Westworld and Huluâs The Handmaidâs Tale: the former a solemn  plodding update of Michael Crichtonâs 1973 film  in which subjugated androids revolt and take over a theme park; the latter a stylish and compelling adaptation of Margaret Atwoodâs 1985 novel  in which the United States becomes a patriarchal theocracy. Other recent examples include Amazonâs The Man in the High Castle (based on Philip K. Dickâs 1962 novel about an alternate reality in which the Axis powers have won World War II)  HBOâs The Leftovers (about a world in which 2 percent of the population has mysteriously disappeared)  and Netflixâs new Altered Carbon (a cyberpunk gorefest based on a 2002 novel by Richard K. Morgan). Stretching the criteria a bit  one could perhaps include the long-running zombie odyssey The Walking Dead and its spin-off  Fear the Walking Dead  and sitcoms that play with dystopic elements  like The Good Place and The Last Man on Earth.
The success of Black Mirror is the proximate cause for the existence of  Philip K. Dickâs  Electric Dreams  also produced by Channel 4 and available here on Amazon. Dick  of course  is one of the past masters of the dystopia genre: His 1968 novel Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? was the basis for the seminal Ridley Scott film Blade Runner  and his work has been mined by Hollywood countless times ever since.  Electric Dreams  adapts 10 of  Dickâs  short stories  including âThe Hood Makerâ (which imagines a class war between telepaths and normal citizens  who resent their mindsâ being invaded) and âThe Father Thingâ (in which a childâs father is replaced by a sinister alien doppelgÃ¤nger).
 Electric Dreams  is slickly made and intermittently effective  but despite some half-hearted attempts to reimagine or update the material (the boy in âThe Father Thing â upon uncovering the alien conspiracy  posts a video on the Internet with the hashtag â#RESISTâ)  it doesnât really feel of our moment. Part of the problem is that Dickâs work has been adapted for film so many times already that itâs hard to watch a given episode of Electric Dreams  however well executed  and not compare it unfavorably  if unfairly  with Blade Runner  or Paul Verhoevenâs Total Recall  or Steven Spielberg âs  Minority Report.  Dickâs  sensibility is idiosyncratic and sui generis  but at this point it feels more like a piece of intellectual property than the amphetamine-fueled gnostic vision it once was. Is anybody âs  mind really blown by the is-our-world-real-or-just-a-simulation conundrum posed by âReal Life â for example  after weâve seen not only Total Recall but The Matrix and Westworld and a hundred other iterations of it?
The problem  however  isnât just overfamiliarity. Dystopias draw their power from an analysis of the present  and  Dick âs once-radical vision of the future is now as far in the past as H.G. Wellsâs was for  Dick  when  he  began writing. This is what Black Mirror  for all its flaws  has over Electric Dreams: The series feels like itâs about things that Brooker is genuinely worried about  not a dutiful tribute to what someone was worried about in the 1960s; itâs the future as seen from the 21st century  not the 20th. This problem is endemic to many of the recent dystopian shows. The fact that Westworld is based on a movie from 1973  and The Handmaidâs Tale on a novel from 1985  doesnât invalidate their value as entertainments or as cultural commentaries. But it does introduce concerns alien to the dystopiaâs imperative to take the worst of the present day and amplify it.

Ex Output:

Neutral