Given a document, an entity and its sentiment towards the entity, verify if it is the correct sentiment towards the entity. Answer should be yes or no. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

Ex Input:
Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Vladimir Putin is Neutral . Russian President Vladimir Putin  participates in a forum of regional and local media organized by the Russian Popular Front in Kaliningrad  Russia. (Alexei Druzhinin/Pool/EPA)
A day after unveiling dramatic new weapons — including a nuclear-powered cruise missile — that sparked talk of a return to Cold War tensions   Russian President Vladimir Putin  suggested that  he 'd reverse the collapse of the Soviet Union if  he  could.
 Putin 's comments on the 1991 collapse of the U.S.S.R. — which bound Russia and many of its neighbors while exerting influence in Eastern Europe and abroad for almost seven decades — came at a question-and-answer forum held Friday in Kaliningrad. Taking questions from the audience  the Russian leader was asked what event in his nation's history he would have liked to change.
 Putin  has been been leader of Russia in some form or another since 2000  making  him  the longest-serving Kremlin leader since Joseph Stalin. This week   Putin  used  his  annual address to announce a series of new weapon technologies that  he  dubbed "invincible " including nuclear-powered missiles that would be difficult for conventional missile defense systems to combat.
 Putin  is easily expected to win next weekend's election  with a poll conducted last week giving  him  almost 70 percent — almost 10 times the share of the vote of  his  nearest rival  a candidate from the Communist Party.
Despite  his  regret about the collapse of the Soviet Union   Putin  told the audience on Friday that  he  wouldn't want to live in any other period than the present. Asked about  his  dreams for the future   the Russian president  said: "I want our country to be successful  powerful  stable  balanced and looking ahead."
 Putin ’s new missiles could probably strike the U.S. The old ones could  too.

Ex Output:
no


Ex Input:
Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Prager U is Positive . Popular conservative/libertarian channel  Prager U  is once again being censored by Google and YouTube for a video deemed too “hateful.”
The video is titled “Born to Hate Jews ” and while the title seems dark  the message is the exact opposite. The speaker this time around is Kasim Hafeez  founder of the Israel Campaign  and in the video  he  tells the story of  his  journey from being a Muslim who came very close to being a terrorist against Israel  to a man whose first hand education led  him  to stand with country  he  previously hated.
The core of  his  message is that  he  discovered that Israel is not the horrible  oppressive  and murderous state that many Muslim parents teach their children  and college professors teach their students.  He  uses the story to point out that education about  his  enemy turned  his  enemy into  his  friend.
“YouTube’s removal of PragerU’s video is particularly alarming. YouTube labeled the video as ‘hate speech ’ which is ironic since the video is about fighting hatred and anti-Semitism  and is presented by a Muslim ” said Prager U’s Communication Director Jared Sichel.
Google and YouTube have censored  Prager U  in the past as well  having placed some of their educational content in the “restricted” column  which would block videos from being seen in places like schools  where these videos would have the most impact.
While  Prager U’s  videos have not carried mainstream messages  and even covered topics from views that are not politically correct   they  have never been inflammatory  obscene  or hateful. That YouTube is labeling this video promoting peace  understanding  and factuality as “hate speech” raises questions that should be asked about what values lay at the heart of the company.

Ex Output:
yes


Ex Input:
Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity David Trobisch is Positive . In 2006  New Testament scholar David Trobisch abandoned such lofty outlets as Oxford Press and the Journal of Papyrology and Epigraphy for a more mainstream venue: Free Inquiry.
In that feisty secular humanist journal   Trobisch  identified the likely editor of the New Testament as second-century Bishop Polycarp of Smyrna and suggested that Polycarp  not Luke  wrote much of the book of Acts.
 Trobisch  shared the magazineâs cover billing with Christopher Hitchens and the atheist animal rights theorist Peter Singer.
None of this would be unusual â serious New Testament scholars constantly probe its cloudy origins  wherever that leads â if  Trobisch  were not now prominently employed by one of the most famously conservative Christian families in America.
It will showcase biblical artifacts from the 40 000-piece Green collection  one of the largest in private hands. As director of the collection   Trobisch  does not run the museum ( its  director is Cary Summers)  but in addition to enlarging  curating and cataloging the trove  he participates in the crucial conversation about which items will go into the museum  and how.
A former Heidelberg University professor   Trobisch  also acts as roving ambassador to the worlds of high academia and top-rate museums. His presence poses a conundrum to the Greensâ many critics: As believers that the Bible is God-given and inerrant  could the family â and the museum that is their brainchild â be more open to dispassionate scholarship than previously assumed?
A tall  gently spoken 56-year-old whose russet hair is now mostly gray   Trobisch  splits  his  time between Germany  where  his  wife  son and two grandchildren live  and a home in Springfield  Mo. In the U.S. he considers himself part of the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America  a mainline denomination that allows gay clergy.
 Trobisch  eventually gravitated to New Testament criticism  the close study of ancient manuscripts for clues as to how the 27-book New Testament came together.
 He  met the Greens when  he  asked permission to look at their 850 ancient New Testament documents. Soon   he  was advising the family on acquisitions (âMy strategy was to buy fewer items but only the highest qualityâ). In February   he  was hired as director.
 Trobisch âs responsibilities extend beyond researching and caring for the collection.  He  recently revamped the content in the Greensâ 1 000- item Bible exhibition âPassages.â  He  also created one-off exhibits in places such as the Vatican  Jerusalem and (very quietly) Cuba. Next up? Philadelphia (in time for Pope Francisâ visit)  Berlin  Beijing and Moscow.
One day in early April   Trobisch  was alighting in New York after a three-week trip involving at least six countries on four continents  having discussed Green extension museums with professionals from Africa and Asia.  He  considered a Bible for sale in Istanbul  hired a curator in Germany and helped open the latest Passages in Santa Clarita  Calif.
The museumâs burgeoning relationship with blue-chip institutions is partly attributable to Trobischâs prestige and contact list. When Cambridge University Library wanted to auction some treasured goods  the Greens bought them â and left them with Cambridge. There was no quid quo pro  but Cambridge owns the Codex Bezae  which  Trobisch  calls âthe fourth most important manuscript of the New Testament.â The strengthened relationship increases the chances the Washington museum might someday show it.
 Trobisch  might have expected some philosophical friction with the Greens  who famously turn to the Bible for everything  including business decisions. But  he  says Hobby Lobby chain president Steve Green is open to new scholarship.
âWe agreed that if I say something about the Bible  he  disagrees with and I can show  him  the quote   he  will concede. If I cannot support it by a quote  I will concede.â
â He âs a Bible freak â  Trobisch  said. âLike me.â
 Trobisch  disagrees with some in âthe media and my scholarly peersâ that  his  employment by the museum represents a faceoff of âfundamentalism against sound scholarship.â Instead   he  said  it constitutes âtwo parties standing at opposite ends of the Christian spectrum talking to each other and working together. This almost never happens in the U.S.â

Ex Output:

yes