instruction:
Categorize the comment on the basis of obscenity. If the comment is obscene output Yes, otherwise output No.
question:
Besides being the aloha state...we are a state of islands.  Consider that tourism with their low paying service industry jobs, construction, military stipends for rentals, and present GET contribute and advance homelessness in the aloha state.

20+ years ago I worked with the homeless.  Many were mentally ill and/ or addicted.  Now today's homeless include families.  Outreach is about aloha (ha and fortitude) and relationship.  We all know the issue is affordable permanent housing.  Perhaps...the reluctance of homeless families to move into a temporary shelter is that they don't see a long term plan of possibilities.
answer:
No


question:
Are you shitting me?
answer:
Yes


question:
I'm sure that many of them are happy you don't live amongst them as well.  

Is everyone who doesn't believe 100% with you a 'moron'?   Or are they allowed a percentage of disagreement and then become 'cretins', perhaps?  

Is there a sliding scale for 'idiots' or an 'ignoramus'?  How about 'dolts'?  Where do they fit into your pantheon of those who are less exalted and less all-knowing than yourself?
answer:

Yes