Given a document, an entity and its sentiment towards the entity, verify if it is the correct sentiment towards the entity. Answer should be yes or no. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

Input: Consider Input: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Thomas Frank is Neutral . Thomas Frank  had to leave the liberal cable news outlet because of  his  role in a discredited story about Anthony Scaramucciâs alleged ties to Russia  a story CNN had to retract.
Interestingly  it looks like one of  Frank âs first assignments will apparently be to investigate the same storyline that cost the reporter  his  last job â the possible connections between President Trump and  his  associates with Russia.
âThe new hire is  Thomas Frank   late of CNN's ill-fated investigations unit that was disbanded in the wake of the controversial Scaramucci story. Iâm sure youâve read about it â said a statement to staff sent on Monday from Marc Seibel  National Security Editor for BuzzFeed.
The memo states  Frank  will start on Oct. 2 and â his  first order of business will be the Mueller probe into Russian election meddling and possible Trump collusion.â
 Frank  left CNN in June after the network was forced to retract a story connecting Scaramucci with investigations into the Russian Direct Investment Fund.  Frank  authored the story  which cited a single anonymous source. Editor Eric Lichtblau and Lex Haris  who oversaw the investigative unit  also resigned as a result. The story was eventually deleted because it âdid not meet CNN's editorial standards â and an apology was issued to Scaramucci.
The  Frank  hiring is the latest in a series of episodes involving CNN and BuzzFeed. Soon after  Frank âs story was retracted  BuzzFeed ran a story revealing an internal memo from CNNMoney Executive Editor Rich Barbieri warning staffers not to publish content involving potential ties between Trumpâs team and Russia without first coming to him and another CNN vice president.

Output: yes


Input: Consider Input: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Paul Ryan is Positive . (CNN)  House Speaker Paul Ryan  ripped  Donald Trump's  recent remarks saying a judge presiding over a lawsuit involving  his  business was biased because of  his  Mexican heritage as "the textbook definition of a racist comment."
As  he  stood surrounded by community activists and top House GOP members   Ryan  admitted Tuesday that the firestorm over  Trump 's comments was undercutting  his  own push to roll out a positive policy agenda for  his  party.  He  said  he  wouldn't defend  Trump  but instead would concentrate on  his  agenda project.
"I disavow those comments  " Ryan  said.
Pressed on whether  he  regretted  his  own endorsement of  Trump  that came last week   Ryan  added  "I regret those comments  he  made."
"It's absolutely unacceptable  " Ryan  said. But  he  stood by by  his  support for the controversial business mogul. "Do I think Hillary Clinton is the answer? No I do not."
Continued GOP angst about the fallout from  Trump 's comments cast a major shadow over  Ryan 's months of work crafting a detailed agenda plan for  his  party.
JUST WATCHED Trump:  Ryan  endorsement about GOP 'winning' Replay More Videos ... MUST WATCH Trump: Ryan endorsement about GOP 'winning' 01:53
 Ryan  said ultimately  he  has more in common on the policy issues of the day with  Trump  and better odds of getting those proposals enacted into law.
 Ryan  who was making his third visit to the City of Hope House of Help center in an impoverished Washington neighborhood   stressed the success stories of those who have overcome addiction and other problems and become productive members of the community.

Output: no


Input: Consider Input: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Philip K. Dick is Neutral . Lately  weâve been seeing a boom in TV dystopias. Two of the most successful premieres in the past few years have been HBOâs Westworld and Huluâs The Handmaidâs Tale: the former a solemn  plodding update of Michael Crichtonâs 1973 film  in which subjugated androids revolt and take over a theme park; the latter a stylish and compelling adaptation of Margaret Atwoodâs 1985 novel  in which the United States becomes a patriarchal theocracy. Other recent examples include Amazonâs The Man in the High Castle (based on Philip K. Dickâs 1962 novel about an alternate reality in which the Axis powers have won World War II)  HBOâs The Leftovers (about a world in which 2 percent of the population has mysteriously disappeared)  and Netflixâs new Altered Carbon (a cyberpunk gorefest based on a 2002 novel by Richard K. Morgan). Stretching the criteria a bit  one could perhaps include the long-running zombie odyssey The Walking Dead and its spin-off  Fear the Walking Dead  and sitcoms that play with dystopic elements  like The Good Place and The Last Man on Earth.
The success of Black Mirror is the proximate cause for the existence of  Philip K. Dickâs  Electric Dreams  also produced by Channel 4 and available here on Amazon. Dick  of course  is one of the past masters of the dystopia genre: His 1968 novel Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? was the basis for the seminal Ridley Scott film Blade Runner  and his work has been mined by Hollywood countless times ever since.  Electric Dreams  adapts 10 of  Dickâs  short stories  including âThe Hood Makerâ (which imagines a class war between telepaths and normal citizens  who resent their mindsâ being invaded) and âThe Father Thingâ (in which a childâs father is replaced by a sinister alien doppelgÃ¤nger).
 Electric Dreams  is slickly made and intermittently effective  but despite some half-hearted attempts to reimagine or update the material (the boy in âThe Father Thing â upon uncovering the alien conspiracy  posts a video on the Internet with the hashtag â#RESISTâ)  it doesnât really feel of our moment. Part of the problem is that Dickâs work has been adapted for film so many times already that itâs hard to watch a given episode of Electric Dreams  however well executed  and not compare it unfavorably  if unfairly  with Blade Runner  or Paul Verhoevenâs Total Recall  or Steven Spielberg âs  Minority Report.  Dickâs  sensibility is idiosyncratic and sui generis  but at this point it feels more like a piece of intellectual property than the amphetamine-fueled gnostic vision it once was. Is anybody âs  mind really blown by the is-our-world-real-or-just-a-simulation conundrum posed by âReal Life â for example  after weâve seen not only Total Recall but The Matrix and Westworld and a hundred other iterations of it?
The problem  however  isnât just overfamiliarity. Dystopias draw their power from an analysis of the present  and  Dick âs once-radical vision of the future is now as far in the past as H.G. Wellsâs was for  Dick  when  he  began writing. This is what Black Mirror  for all its flaws  has over Electric Dreams: The series feels like itâs about things that Brooker is genuinely worried about  not a dutiful tribute to what someone was worried about in the 1960s; itâs the future as seen from the 21st century  not the 20th. This problem is endemic to many of the recent dystopian shows. The fact that Westworld is based on a movie from 1973  and The Handmaidâs Tale on a novel from 1985  doesnât invalidate their value as entertainments or as cultural commentaries. But it does introduce concerns alien to the dystopiaâs imperative to take the worst of the present day and amplify it.


Output: yes