Given a document, generate a short title of the document. The title should convey the main idea/event/topic about which the document is being written. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].
--------
Question: Warren Buffett's  plans to eventually pass the reins of Berkshire Hathaway to a successor took has taken a major new step. On Tuesday   Buffett  laid out why Greg Abel  CEO of Berkshire Hathaway  and Ajit Jain  head of its insurance operations  will join Charlie Munger as vice chairman of the $500 billion conglomerate.
Jain  by contrast  oversees Berkshire's gigantic insurance outfit  where he's shown deft underwriting skill and the discipline to trim exposures to overly competitive markets like catastrophic insurance and reinsurance when pricing is unfavorable. A native of India  Jain came to the U.S. to get an MBA at Harvard and then cut his teeth at consultancy McKinsey. In 1985  he was hired by  Buffett  to work in Berkshire's insurance operations. Said  Buffett  in a 2009 shareholder letter  "I immediately knew we had found a superstar." A decade later  the division was bolstered by  Buffett 's acquisition of the Geico shares Berkshire didn't already own. From an insurance float of $3.6 billion in 1995  Berkshire's float now stands at about $100 billion annually.
In addition to Abel and Jain  Berkshire's investing business also has two rising figures.  Buffett  is increasing  his  allocations of Berkshire funds to lieutenants Todd Combs and Ted Weschler  who each manage over $10 billion  and have led the conglomerate to positions ranging from Apple to Charter Communications.
As succession plans harden   Buffett  and Munger will continue in their existing positions. That means they will continue to be overseeing major capital allocation decisions and investment activities  for instance any major deals. In addition to making headlines for Berkshire's succession plans   Buffett  also made headlines for  his  views on the wider investing landscape.
Most notably   Buffett  said tax reform will have a big impact on Berkshire's owners  telling CNBC's Quick that shareholders effectively have seen their ownership of  the company 's profits rise by over 20% as corporate rates have fallen from 35% to 21%.
About crypto currencies   Buffett  said today's euphoria inevitably will lead to heart break. "If I could buy a five year put on any of the crypto currencies I would do it "  Buffett  said  admitting  he  would never short the speculative asset because it's not something  he  knows well.  He  dished out the following common sense  "why in the world should I take a short position in something I don't know anything about."
But  his  views are crystal clear. "I think what's going on definitely will come to a bad ending "  Buffett  said.
Warren Buffett: My Greatest Investing Advice And The Investments Everyone Should Make

Answer: Berkshire Hathaway Names Abel And Jain As Vice Chairmen As Buffett Succession Plans Sharpen


Question: Laura Ingraham  was one of the few people who saw Donald Trumpâs shocking victory coming. More importantly  as a former speechwriter for Ronald Reagan who saw firsthand how viciously the Bush-aligned establishment despised Reaganâs working-class voters   Ingraham  understands how powerful the conservative-populist movement is and why the elites in the permanent political class have spent gazillions and worked overtime for three decades to thwart it.
In  her  blockbuster new book  Billionaire at the Barricades: The Populist Revolution from Reagan to Trump  Ingraham  the best-selling author  explains how Trump got elected and the forces heâand other economic nationalistsâwill have to battle to implement the peopleâs agenda.
Billionaire at the Barricades is a must-read because  Ingraham   who still gets chills when she sees footage of the crowd at Kemper Arena in 1976 realizing they had nominated the wrong man in Gerald Ford  takes readers on a fast-paced journey through the 2016 campaign cycle and shows how everyone who was blindsided by Trumpâs rise should have seen it coming  especially after Dave Bratâs shocking primary victory over then-House Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-VA) in 2014.
Elites give off the impression that Trumpâs populism on the campaign trail was something they had never seen before when  in fact  every candidate who has won the presidency in the television age has been the one who was the most populist. As  Ingraham  writes  âpresidential candidates invoke the populist style because it connects with working people.â
Conservatism and populism  according to  Ingraham   âoverlap in their opposition to âbig thingsââbig government  big international organizations  big media  big business cronyism.â
Reagan understood that âthese distant  uncaring entities rob people of decision making and ignore their interests â and  Ingraham  notes that âPat Buchanan and Donald Trump summarized conservative populism best when each vowed to put âAmerica first.ââ
âConservative populists tend to support a policy of economic nationalismâpeople-centered economic policies that put the nation and its workers first. They oppose a massive national debt because it weakens America and makes its citizens beholden to lenders â  she  continues. âThey also believe high taxes are bad because they sap workersâ wages and economic freedom. Similarly  they are against huge trade deals and international organizations like the World Trade Organization because they take power out of the hands of voters and give it to a far-away and often hostile global elite.â
When it comes to foreign policy   Ingraham  explains that âconservative populists oppose broad military interventionism and believe military force should only be used when American interests are threatened.â  She  slams populismâs critics who foolishly toss around âthe term âisolationismâ to dismiss populist foreign policy â even though that label does not describe any populist  she  has ever known.
 Ingraham  points out that âthroughout the Cold War  populists were among the strongest voices opposing Soviet communism.â In addition  populists have always believed that âsquandering the nationâs wealth and blood on un-winnable wars and nation-building is unwise. Instead  they support a pragmatic foreign policy based on achieving âpeace through strengthâ by maintaining a strong military and using it prudently.â
Unfortunately  as  Ingraham  details  âsome conservatives took a dangerous detourâ and âthrust us into a bizarre world of globalization  wars based on idealism and nation-building  and intense hatred toward the very voters who accounted for the Reagan coalition in the first place.â
The betrayal started almost immediately after George H.W. Bush won Reaganâs third term. The Bush administration purged Reaganites  and  Ingraham  recalls that Margaret Tutwiler told Reaganite Ed Rollins at a party that âthere are a lot of us who had to suffer during the eight years of Reagan  and now itâs our turn.â
âWe were Reagan people. They were Bush people. We all knew what the differences were â  Ingraham  writes. âMany of the GOP Establishment types who behind closed doors scoffed at Reagan as a dim-witted former actor with anââultraconservativeâ outlook were now working in the Bush administration. They thought it was time to return the Republican Party to what they believed was its more genteel  respectable roots. In effect  it meant the return to power of the Rockefeller Republicans who had worked to deny Reagan the presidency in 1976.â
Bushâs Office of Management and Budget Director Richard Darman convinced Bush to infamously abandon his âread my lipsâ pledge not to raise taxes  and  in the end   Ingraham  argues that âGeorge H. W. Bush stalled the conservative-populist engine that powered Reaganism.â As Rollins said  âGeorge Bush was the beneficiary of the greatest baton pass in presidential history in 1988  and he and his people tossed it away.â
âGlobalism is fundamentally anti-American because it aims to raze American sovereignty by atrophying our ability to take independent actions that are in our nationâs best interests â  Ingraham  writes  pointing out that globalists do not understand that âbecause of the enormous anti-American sentiment around the world  itâs almost impossible to create a multinational organization where U.S. interests donât become compromised or harmed.â
Just like his father  George W. Bush campaigned as a populist but governed as a globalist.  Ingraham  blames âBushâs decision to aggressively pursue amnesty after his unpopular warâ for insulting the âmillions of conservative-populists who had worked so hard to put him in power.â
âBecause of Bush  conservatives lost everything â  she  continues. âWe lost the House. We lost the Senate. And we lost the White House.â

Answer: Laura Ingrahamâs âBillionaire at the Barricadesâ Gives Conservative


Question: JUST SHORT:  Baker  Mayfield unable to lead Oklahoma to victory in final game
But things changed radically in the third quarter. Suddenly  Georgiaâs defense was dominant.  Baker  Mayfield felt pressure â and unlike so many games throughout  his  career  was unable to escape it;  he  was sacked three times in the pivotal third quarter  which the Sooners spent bottled up in their own end of the field  and threw an interception on the first play of the fourth quarter  leading to the Bulldogsâ go-ahead touchdown. Offensively  Georgiaâs running game kicked into high gear  with Nick Chubb and Sony Michel each scoring touchdowns on long runs.
Although  Mayfield  tied  it  with a fantastic drive midway through the fourth quarter â and Oklahoma took the lead on a defensive score â Jake Fromm matched him  leading the Bulldogs to the tying score with 55 seconds left.
Georgiaâs freshman quarterback was overshadowed in the run-up to the game by Baker Mayfield  the Heisman winner. And he didnât touch the ball on the final play; Sony Michel took a direct snap to the house.
Discombobulated by Oklahoma in the first half  Georgia turned things around with a dominant third-quarter performance. Oklahoma led by 14 and got the ball to start the quarter. But Georgia sandwiched a pair of three-and-outs around a 50-yard touchdown run by Nick Chubb  then stopped Oklahoma again.  Baker Mayfield  who was rarely touched  in the first half  spent the third quarter on  his  back â including two sacks on consecutive plays to stall one possession. When  Mayfield âs third-down pass intended for tight end Mark Andrews sailed high  it was an easy interception for safety Dominick Sanders  who returned it to the 4.
The rookie head coachâs well-earned reputation as a strategist and playcaller was on full display from the beginning  when  Baker Mayfield  connected with fullback Dimitri Flowers on consecutive plays for 26 and 16 yards. The Sooners mixed runs and passes â and had especially nice calls on third downs  including screens to beat blitzes and shallow crossing routes that became long gains. The tour de force came at the end of the first half  when on third-and-goal from the 2  Riley dialed up a toss to Flowers going left â¦ that became a reverse to receiver CeeDee Lamb â¦ that finished as a run-pass option for the receiver  who lofted an easy touchdown pass to  Mayfield  in the back corner of the end zone.

Answer:
Georgia defeats Oklahoma in classic Rose Bowl in overtime