In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Q: Comment: Anybody with half a brain can learn a second language. Hundreds of millions across the planet speak two or more. Most Europeans speak several, the best people in Canada who want to lead the country can and do learn a second language. Complaining it is somehow unfair  is for losers.

A: Non-obscene
****
Q: Comment: How so? She was doing a busy job, not auditioning for a walk-on part in this precious idiot's "journey".

A: Non-obscene
****
Q: Comment: "But there are at least some indications that the FTA may not wait beyond summer for the city and the Honolulu Authority for Rapid Transportation to correct the project’s deep funding shortfall. It’s too much money to be risked, even if it’s a relatively small part of the anticipated final cost, now estimated to reach around $10 billion."

On one hand they state "It's too much money to be risked", yet the jist of this opinion piece is "Damn the torpedoes, full speed ahead"?

A:
Obscene
****