We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

Example Input: The Senate's Sargent at Arms, and the assistant former director of the FBI says there is no way to prevent someone who is committed to carry it out.
Example Output: Valid

Example Input: To just say guns should be aloud because criminals have them, is childish and we need to age past barbaric murder caused by guns.
Example Output: Valid

Example Input: So now you're saying that the drug cartels are getting all those anti-aircraft cannons and rocket propelled grenades and fragmentation grenades, for absolutely nothing?
Example Output:
Valid