In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.
--------
Question: Comment: In a whorehouse like Fox News somebody actually propositioned somebody!?
Shocking I tells you. Shocking!

Answer: Obscene


Question: Comment: You can't culturally appropriate fictional cultures because they don't exist. Your example misses the point.

Answer: Non-obscene


Question: Comment: This Chris Neil fantasy, please.   The Sens did not win b/c he played 2+ mins in this game.

He did take a penalty, which negated an Ott PP.  Hey, great.  What better way to help your team than taking a stupid penalty, which not only cost your team  said PP, it cost you 10 mins in the penalty box.

Yeah, Neil was great.

Of course all the Sens' players are going to all sing kumbaya, they won.

Now, any coach that dresses a player to play barely 2 mins of a game, that coach is handicapping his team, they're 1 player down to the other team, and that's not good.

Ott is only still alive due to the NHL's insistence on using some bizarre scheme for the playoffs, in which the 6th and 7th seeds play in the 1st round, the winner playing the 5th seed, while the top seeded teams go at it.

Ott is the only team that qualified for the playoffs that allowed more goals than it scored.

Good for them, they've taken advantage, but they are wholly undeserving and really lucky.

Answer:
Non-obscene