In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

[Q]: Comment: Just painful to read.  Far too many unsubstantiated and seemingly concocted narratives that for me. simply do not ring true in the real world.

What bothers me most is the huge tendency to attribute personal characteristics to a gender.  eg.  Donald Trump is a pig.  Harvey Weinstien is a pig.  Therefore being a pig is a male characteristic.  The implication is that, to varying degrees, it is in all of us.

I'm not buying in.  I am responsible for my own actions.  Harvey is responsible for his.  I am not sharing responsibility for his actions just because I have a penis.
[A]: Sexual-explicit


[Q]: Comment: His skill at foreign affairs is off to a very bad start.  Confucius say "he who blabs with big ego get big kick in ass".
[A]: Sexual-explicit


[Q]: Comment: Sounds like producer intended a form of Semitic hyperbole to make a point?
Didn't see it.  Wonder if his point was the institutional church was anti-sex?
A trove of works underscore how bad sex was.  No "Joy of Sex" manuals in RCC circles!
Pleasure and sex were not condoned until Aquinas thought a little pleasure was acceptable, only in context of conception.  Hence the RCC joke, "Not a sin if you didn't take pleasure in it". 
And masturbation remains a mortal sin! Taking pleasure when not conceiving.
The stranglehold on sexuality in the hands of men supposedly celibate!?
Like 9 Republican senators deciding on health care for women.
Not that films may be bizarre but the theater of the absurd we're forced to play roles in is.
[A]:
Sexual-explicit