We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Q: Sent1: There has been so much cases of people who have been executed, only to be found innocent after their death.
 Sent2: "We know for a FACT that innocent people have been put to death already"- then give me their names.

A: Similar
****
Q: Sent1: Since murder is viewed as wrong, it generally makes more sense to eliminate the death penalty because murder rates are generally lower in those states.
 Sent2: In the United States, states without the death penalty has consistently lower murder rates.

A: Similar
****
Q: Sent1: And that killer has help, he has the people that support the death penalty and will give him more appeals, and if found guilty he'll get an easy way out with death, he won't have to suffer.
 Sent2: So what does he have to do with a debate like this about murderers and the death penalty?

A:
Not similar
****