Given a document and an entity the task is to select the author's sentiment towards the entity. Sentiments can be Positive, Neutral and Negative. Select Positive if the article expresses a positive view towards the given entity or praises its quality or skills. Select Neutral if the document expresses no clear view towards the entity or has equal amounts of positive and negative statements or expressing some fact/quote by someone else. Select Negative if the article expresses a negative view towards like harsh remarks, criticizing entities action/decision etc. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].
--------
Question: What is the sentiment of the following document towards the entity David Coulter ? FRANK LANGFITT  BYLINE:  David Coulter  owns the Inishowen Mushroom farm here. Today a conveyer's loading compost into giant trays where  Coulter  grows  his  mushrooms.
 DAVID COULTER : We grow in these plastic tunnels. They're insulated tunnels. We employ about 34 people.
 COULTER : Well  we're filling today so it's two weeks and three days we will have mushrooms for picking.
LANGFITT: Brexit's still 18 months away  but  Coulter 's mushroom farm is already paying a price. Soon after the Brexit vote  the value of the British pound plunged.
 COULTER : Well  it's been disastrous. Ninety-eight percent of our product goes into the U.K. market.
LANGFITT: Which means  Coulter  earns around 18 percent less for  his  mushrooms because  he 's paid in pounds. The pound fell because investors think leaving the EU's massive market will damage the U.K. economy. Recently Coulter  who's 67  has had to reduce costs. He's laid off workers. His son  Russell  is working up to 18 hours a day  and Coulter has also found a way to save money on compost.
LANGFITT: Back at the mushroom farm in County Donegal  remaining workers are pushing carts of freshly picked mushrooms. The farm produces at least 60 000 pounds a week. I pose a question to  owner David Coulter .
 COULTER : Don't know. I honestly don't know.

Answer: Positive


Question: What is the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Melissa Francis ? Simon Rosenberg objected to host  Melissa Francis  framing  her  question to ask what Democrats could change in the Trump tax plan to make it more palatable to them.
âI donât think thatâs the issue  Melissa â he said before being interrupted immediately by  Francis . âWeâre not gonna do talking points!â  she  exclaimed.
âWell youâre doing talking points â  Francis  interrupted again.
âNo Iâm not doing talking points â  she  said  âitâs insulting that you say that to  me  as if I donât actually understand what Iâm saying and can do my own analysis about the economy.â
âBut youâre not answering the question â  she  protested.
Rosenberg and Francis then grappled over whether Trumpâs plan would cut taxes for the middle class over the long term  with  Francis  arguing on the basis of a dynamic understanding of tax cuts. âGood for you  Melissa â Rosenberg responded.
At the end of the segment   Francis  tried to give Rosenberg a peace offering saying they should get a drink sometime. âMelissa  donât worry  Iâm never coming back on this show again  so it doesnât matter â he responded  and stripped off his microphone.

Answer: Neutral


Question: What is the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Pat Robertson ? But  Pat Robertson  doesn’t see it that way. In  his  mind  this nation’s unfolding tragedy is a direct fault of people who don’t respect Donald Trump and the American flag enough. Yes  really.
What are Pat Robertson’s possible motives here? While people still fought for their lives after the deadliest mass shooting in modern American history  why did a televangelist feel the need to issue a statement this useless? He wasn’t trying to provide comfort. He wasn’t helping to make sense of the tragedy  because his thoughts here are violently stupid.
Robertson wasn’t trying to be helpful. He was trying to insert himself into a story that had nothing to do with him. He couldn’t help it. He can never help it. Because  Pat Robertson is an evil man .  He ’s been so evil for so long that one has to wonder whose side  he ’s on.
Let’s do a quick topline comparison between Satan  the Prince of Darkness  and Pat Robertson  the Prince of Doddering.
 Robertson  has spent decades lying and obfuscating  throwing  himself  into the middle of discussions in which  he  wasn’t invited  to offer opinions that nobody wanted.  He ’s weighed in on the Iraq War  9/11  sex outside of marriage  Hinduism  the earthquake in Haiti  abortion  and every other topic du jour  tragic or zeitgeist  that can help boost Pat Robertson Awareness.  He ’s thrown  his  fortunes in with warlords  hucksters  and profiteers.
 He ’s claimed  he  can leg-press 2 000 pounds  thanks to the aid of a protein shake.
 Pat Robertson  has built a billion-dollar empire by saying  he ’s a person who knows what God wants other people to do. As host of The 700 Club   he ’s spent thousands of hours on the bleakest television channel preaching to  his  followers about how they can emulate  Jesus   how they can send him money in an extremely holy way. Meanwhile  he has lived a life of wealth and privilege  at the expense of dupes.
What  Robertson  has said about Las Vegas is so much worse than  his  usual praying for attention.  He ’s rebranding cruelty as sanctimony  nastiness as wisdom.  He ’s the answer to the question “What Wouldn’t Jesus Do?”
What’s the difference between  Pat Robertson  and Satan? Satan’s not real. Unfortunately   Pat Robertson  is.

Answer:
Neutral