In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence can be inferred from the statement. Incorrect choices change the meaning in important ways or have details that are not mentioned in the statement. Indicate your answer as 1,2, or 3 corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.

Q: Statement: Even if people are randomly divided into groups, the groups will automatically discriminate against each other. Choices:  1. If people are split up, the larger group will dominate. 2. If groups are split up, there is usually peace. 3. If people are split up, the groups will be against each other.

A: 3
****
Q: Statement: In September 1996, we reported that audit reports and agency selfassessments issued during the previous 2 years showed that weak information security was a widespread problem. Choices:  1. In September 1996, we said the past 2 audit reports showed information security was an issue. 2. In September 1996, we said the past 2 audit reports showed information security was an issue for our email system. 3. In September 1996, we said the past 2 audit reports showed information security was not an issue.

A: 1
****
Q: Statement: In the preamble to the proposed rule, HUD discussed the comments received in response to its July 6, 1993 solicitation and invited further comments. Choices:  1. HUD did not respond to comments on their late 1995 solicitation. 2. HUD addressed comments it received to its 1993 solicitation before stating the proposed rule. 3. Discussion of the comments HUD received was important in changing the proposed rule.

A:
2
****