We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Example Input: Wrong again, there have been many, many, many more cases that that:
Example Output: Invalid

Example Input: Firstly, many people say that Europe does not have the death penalty so the U.S should not.
Example Output: Valid

Example Input: The point made by alec is that society has a legitimate responsibility in preventing those who would destroy innocent lives from doing so [more than once?]
Example Output:
Valid