The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the no-need strategy, otherwise output No. no-need is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used when a participant points out that they do not need an item based on personal context such as suggesting that they have ample water to spare. no-need can directly benefit the opponent since it implies that the item is up for grabs.

[Q]: Context: 'Good!  How are you?' 'I'm doing well! Almost ready for my camping trip. Need some more supplies though.' 'Which supplies do you need?'
Utterance: 'Well, I really need water in case we get really thirsty from hiking. I also need firewood in case it gets colder and we need more. It would be cool to have more food added for dessert like s'mores, but it's not really necessary.'
[A]: Yes


[Q]: Context: 'Hello, what do you need the most for your camping trip?'
Utterance: 'ideally some firewood, it got soaked due to me being caught in the rain. what do you need the most?'
[A]: No


[Q]: Context: 'What are your preferences?  I always love having a big fire at night when I am camping and I do think water is more important than food.'
Utterance: 'I like to have a lot of food to keep my energy up, but I might need some firewood to cook that food. I can't wait for my camping trip.🙂'
[A]:
No