instruction:
In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence can be inferred from the statement. Incorrect choices change the meaning in important ways or have details that are not mentioned in the statement. Indicate your answer as 1,2, or 3 corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.
question:
Statement: If food stamps are destigmatized, though, nobody will look at you funny--even if you really aren't working at all. Choices:  1. People will still scowl when they see food stamps in use. 2. People won't shame food stamp abusers. 3. No one will look at you funny if you use food stamps.
answer:
3


question:
Statement: And it is impossible to see how this difference from Rust has any bearing upon the First Amendment question, which, to repeat, is whether the funding scheme is 'manipulated' to have a 'coercive effect' on those who do not hold the subsidized position. Choices:  1. It is not possible to see how this difference from Rust has any bearing on the First Amendment question. 2. The difference from Rust on the First Amendment question is very noticeable. 3. The question that was asked it really rather very subjective.
answer:
1


question:
Statement: Now I know you're making it up. Choices:  1. Now I know you are imagining it. 2. Now I know you are in fact right about Mary being a girl. 3. Now I am sure you are conjuring this fiction.
answer:

1