TASK DEFINITION: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: threat and non-threat. Threat is a statement that someone will be hurt or harmed, especially if the person does not do something in particular.
PROBLEM: Comment: This is so sad and heart breaking. I will never understand the total disregard of human life. Does Alaska have the death penalty? These monsters deserve it.

SOLUTION: Threat

PROBLEM: Comment: I find those who chant do so because they either have such a slim argument that they don't want to be drawn into it, or because they lack the mental prowess to mount their argument in a rational manner.  It is for that reason that the "Lock her up," chant is offensive.  

I should point out too that the main perpetrators of the chanting phenomenon are unionists, "Hey, Hey  Ho, Ho.  Fill-in-the-blank has got to go!"   Clever eh?   The "progressives" particularly the enviro-nuts, are no better,  “U.G.L.Y.  Corporate scum you cheat you lie.  You UGLY, uh, uh, you UGLY.”   That intellectual gem and many others are found on the website tarsandsblockade.org

Chanting has no place in rational debate, none.

SOLUTION: Non-threat

PROBLEM: Comment: Statistics are usually used to prove/disprove arguments.  "Liars, damned liars and statisticians" is the common quote.

I have made no such argument of statistical relevance on this issue.  

Springfield has produced the last two convicted sexual offending educators in the local area.  That is a statistic.  

Enjoy!

SOLUTION:
Non-threat