The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the uv-part strategy, otherwise output No. uv-part is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to undermine the requirements of the opponent. For instance, suggesting that the opponent would not need more firewood since they already have the basic supplies or a suggestion that there might be a store near the campsite where the opponent can get the supplies instead.

Ex Input:
Context: 'Hello 🙂' 'Hello!'
Utterance: 'Which item do you need the most?'

Ex Output:
No


Ex Input:
Context: 'hello' 'i need a lot of packages from you' 'I do too.'
Utterance: 'Can you give me your offer?'

Ex Output:
No


Ex Input:
Context: 'Hmm.. well let's see! What is your second priority? I would be willing to give up all of that, if I could get at least 2 firewood. You're right, it sure does get chilly ☹️' 'What if I got 3 foods and 2 waters. and you got 3 firewood and 1 water. If I could get a little more food that doesn't need to be cooked over the fire I might be able to get by. And I'll need to buy more water so I don't have to boil it since I won't have much firewood. ' 'I would say that sounds like a good deal! I am a little worried about water though, there aren't any sources of water where we are going. Hmm..'
Utterance: 'I think having 3 packages of firewood will help! you can always boil water from a  fresh spring 🙂'

Ex Output:

Yes