In this task, you will be shown a sentence, and you should determine whether it is overruling or non-overruling. In law, an overruling sentence is a statement that nullifies a previous case decision as a precedent by a constitutionally valid statute or a decision by the same or higher ranking court which establishes a different rule on the point of law involved. Classify your answers into overruling or non-overruling

Input: Consider Input: bank of the united states v. bank of georgia, 10 wheaton, 347; thompson v. riggs, 5 wallace, 678; robinson v. noble, 8 peters, 198; wright v. reid, 3 term, 554; snow v. perry, 9 pickering, 542; 2 greenleaf on evidence,  601.

Output: non-overruling


Input: Consider Input: any statements to the contrary in johnson v. county of fresno, 64 cal.app.2d 576 [ 149 p.2d 38]; klimper v. city of glendale, 99 cal.app.2d 446 [ 222 p.2d 49]; brown v. sequoia union high school dist., 89 cal.app.2d 604 [ 201 p.2d 66]; and slavin v. city of glendale, 97 cal.app.2d 407 [ 217 p.2d 984], are disapproved.

Output: overruling


Input: Consider Input: also, the record supports the court's findings that diaz's actions were not a product of control by salgado or a product of her fear of him.


Output: non-overruling