TASK DEFINITION: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.
PROBLEM: Comment: Too bad these groups don't clamp down on Marxists peddling their filth as fact.

SOLUTION: Non-obscene

PROBLEM: Comment: No other arrests were made?  You gotta be kidding me!  And I just don't get the philosophy of the police leaving what is obviously a hostile scene to "diffuse" it.  I'm thinking harassing a police officer when they are doing their duty to "serve and protect"  is a crime.  Arrest them all and let them deal with the criminal justice system.. That's gonna cost them money, and we all are lucky some jail time.  This outcome just emboldens the rats...

SOLUTION: Non-obscene

PROBLEM: Comment: Your "you can't even give us an exact date for St Cyril's birth" is simply you being ignorant. Putting a question mark after someone's birth or death date simply says that the date is unknown. It should not surprise anyone that birth records from 4th century Egypt don't exist.

Cyril's life and character are both well known. As a young man, he participated in the railroading of John Chyrsostom, to distract people from charges of fiscal mismanagement by his uncle Theophilus. He deliberately misstated the views of Nestorius, and did not give Nestorius a proper chance to defend himself at Ephesus (and excluded John of Antioch for coming a day late to the council). He expelled the Jews from Alexandria. He incited the mob who lynched Hypatia, the head of the Neo-Platonist school.

All of these are well known to anyone who has studied Church history.

SOLUTION:
Non-obscene