In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

[Q]: Comment: If the Broncos do not give Sloter a chance by having him on their roster and letting him develop then some other team will. NFL scouts are not stupid! He has the highest Wonderlic score from the Combine and is an ideal size for a quarterback. He has a stong arm and throws with accuracy while always looking downfield.  He also has an innate ability to move in the pocket and rarely looks rattled.But, hey, let's bring in some bum and cut this kid and then hope he is around for the practice squad. If he goes to  another team, I hope he comes back to Denver, sometime in the future, and beats their ass!
[A]: Sexual-explicit


[Q]: Comment: Of course the progressives here are 'praying' for Cardinal Pell to be convicted. Why?  Not because he might be guilty or innocent, that is immaterial. It because he is an orthodox Catholic bishop.  Orthodox Catholics in the Curia have been regularly cursed by Pope Francis who has gradually placed his heterodox cronies into high places in the Curia.
"I am the Pope."
[A]: Non-sexual-explicit


[Q]: Comment: Thats why most Californians Love USC and Hawaii! Practice Safe Sex...Make Love with a Trojan! Fight on to Victory! FUCLA
[A]:
Sexual-explicit