In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.
--------
Question: Comment: This article is somewhere between deceptive and fraudulent.
1)The first step in suing the state or any other entity is the FILING of the COMPLAINT and SERVING the defendant the COMPLAINT.  The state says they have not been served the complaint.  Therefore at this time no complaint has been filed.
The truth is, at best, is that the plaintiff is PREPARING to sue the state and I hardly find this to be any way news worthy!  Seriously WTF?

Answer: Non-sexual-explicit


Question: Comment: Ambassador Stevens would like to try alternate nostril breathing, but he can't.  He's dead.

Answer: Non-sexual-explicit


Question: Comment: I would suggest that "inept and corrupt municipal officials" are less likely options for what is happening behind the more likely "society should do whatever the hell it wants and damn the consequences" mindset that is not uncommon in the valley.  There is a fair bit of a legacy of that way of thinking in the valley already.  A good example is the lakes that are polluted, dammed/diverted, and/or having their natural fish populations disappearing (commonly replaced by pike, if anything).  The place people came to in the 50's, 60's, and 70's is very different these days.

Answer:
Non-sexual-explicit