In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

Example Input: Comment: what is with all the crazy black women in govt???
Example Output: Identity-attack

Example Input: Comment: Why is that going to be a problem? White man laws are great at creating criminals in jail houses whereas tribal justice is hard, fierce and stops it dead on. Leave the people alone and quit setting them back with white ways! It's none of anyone's business! Keep your jailhouse friend, the people don't have use for them. And the next time white people want to cry a river about the hardships of tribal justice do everyone a favor and look the other way.
Example Output: Identity-attack

Example Input: Comment: I've been a member for more than 8 years.  I find such persistent charges of secrecy silly, almost lurid.    

There is what's called "privacy"...as in it's a "private" matter for a person to choose to get formation from Opus Dei, so there is no "publishing of members" by OD itself.  Privacy is not secrecy. 

If a member chooses to tell other people where he/she gets spiritual direction, or doctrinal formation, or spiritual formation, etc, then they certainly can. 

See the Crux article today written by John Allen's wife; she's Jewish and not a member of OD. 

Hyper-secrecy...a rather callow point.
Example Output:
Non-identity-attack