The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.
--------
Question: Context: 'No that does work well for me.  If I only have 1 food I need 2 waters and the firewood to make up for the loss of food.' 'What about I have all the food, and you can have everything else? I would think that seems pretty fair.' 'Sorry, I understand where you are coming from but I really need at least one food.  '
Utterance: 'I'm sorry. I would really appreciate having all the foods, because this camping trip is a get togther with my 5 friends one of whom is her birthday and recently lost her mom. So we need lots of snacks to help her celebrate her birthday and support her during this hard time.'

Answer: Yes


Question: Context: 'I would really like to have 3 waters and 3 firewood because this is my first time camping and I don't have survival skills. '
Utterance: 'You must be a comedian.  We will need to come to a compromise because there's no way that's going to happen.  I am like a water buffalo so I'll need at least two waters.  In addition, my family is from the South and will need firewood as well.'

Answer: Yes


Question: Context: 'Sorry - I just cant do that.  I want to come to an agreement but dont feel that its fair.  ' 'But your getting more of the high value item!!!!' 'Hmmmm. So what if I get 2 firewood, 2 waters.  You would get one firewood, 1 water and 3 of the food items????? '
Utterance: 'Fine we've been here too long'

Answer:
No