We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Sent1: If a person wasn't convicted then they surely wouldn't be murdered by the state.
 Sent2: killing someone who has raped them or hurt a family member, while some of these reasons would definitely require being locked up the death penalty does not seem right for alot of situations
Not similar

Sent1: The question is should the death penalty be allowed as a form of punishment.
 Sent2: Death penalty should be allowed for those who deserves it.
Not similar

Sent1: I would guess that most murders are done out of passion, when a person is not acting rationally and thus attempts to model murder as a rational decision are inherently flawed.
 Sent2: I think I could kill someone trying to kill any one of my children.

Not similar