The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.

Ex Input:
Context: 'Well, let's negogiate friend! What interests you the most?' 'Okay. I need 3 package of fire woof and 2 pack of food and 2 pack of water.' 'Hmm ☹️ That does not leave me with much'
Utterance: 'In my team old age sicked peoples and kids are there so I need some extra.'

Ex Output:
Yes


Ex Input:
Context: 'I am ready to give 1 amount of food for you. But I want some quantity of water and firewood for me.' 'I would take 3 packages of food and just 1 package of water. Is it okay for you?' 'No, I don't take this. Because food is important for my child and me.'
Utterance: 'Try to understand our situation. We had food a week back. We were drinking only water for the whole week. We are dying of hunger. Kindly understand our situation.'

Ex Output:
Yes


Ex Input:
Context: 'No, of course not. You can have the extra of those if you'd like. It is really the water that is the most important to me. ' 'Hmmm... I don't really need the firewood,just the food which you are offering and the water. ' 'Okay, can I have the 2 waters and 2 firewood then? I will give you all of the food, and 1 of the water. Do you need any firewood at all?'
Utterance: 'Since carrying the extra would could make your dehydration worse, I'll take any firewood you don't want. But I'll give you the 2 waters and firewood then for the 3 food and 1 firewood. Deal?'

Ex Output:

No