In this task, you are given a part of an article. Your task is to generate headline (title) for this text. Preferred headlines are under fifteen words.

Q: Recent works on word representations mostly rely on predictive models. Distributed word representations (aka word embeddings) are trained to optimally predict the contexts in which the corresponding words tend to appear. Such models have succeeded in capturing word similarities as well as semantic and syntactic regularities. Instead, we aim at reviving interest in a model based on counts. We present a systematic study of the use of the Hellinger distance to extract semantic representations from the word co-occurrence statistics of large text corpora. We show that this distance gives good performance on word similarity and analogy tasks, with a proper type and size of context, and a dimensionality reduction based on a stochastic low-rank approximation. Besides being both simple and intuitive, this method also provides an encoding function which can be used to infer unseen words or phrases. This becomes a clear advantage compared to predictive models which must train these new words.

A: Rehabilitation of Count-based Models for Word Vector Representations
****
Q: We consider the problem of accurately recovering a matrix B of size M ×M , which represents a probability distribution overM outcomes, given access to an observed matrix of “counts” generated by taking independent samples from the distribution B. How can structural properties of the underlying matrix B be leveraged to yield computationally efficient and information theoretically optimal reconstruction algorithms? When can accurate reconstruction be accomplished in the sparse data regime? This basic problem lies at the core of a number of questions that are currently being considered by different communities, including community detection in sparse random graphs, learning structured models such as topic models or hidden Markov models, and the efforts from the natural language processing community to compute “word embeddings”. Many aspects of this problem—both in terms of learning and property testing/estimation and on both the algorithmic and information theoretic sides—remain open. Our results apply to the setting where B has a particular rank 2 structure. For this setting, we propose an efficient (and practically viable) algorithm that accurately recovers the underlying M × M matrix using Θ(M) samples. This result easily translates to Θ(M) sample algorithms for learning topic models with two topics over dictionaries of size M , and learning hidden Markov Models with two hidden states and observation distributions supported on M elements. These linear sample complexities are optimal, up to constant factors, in an extremely strong sense: even testing basic properties of the underlying matrix (such as whether it has rank 1 or 2) requires Ω(M) samples. Furthermore, we provide an even stronger lower bound where distinguishing whether a sequence of observations were drawn from the uniform distribution over M observations versus being generated by an HMM with two hidden states requires Ω(M) observations. This precludes sublinear-sample hypothesis tests for basic properties, such as identity or uniformity, as well as sublinear sample estimators for quantities such as the entropy rate of HMMs. This impossibility of sublinear-sample property testing in these settings is intriguing and underscores the significant differences between these structured settings and the standard setting of drawing i.i.d samples from an unstructured distribution of support size M . ∗MIT. Email: qqh@mit.edu. †University of Washington. Email: sham@cs.washington.edu ‡Stanford University. Email: kweihao@gmail.com §Stanford University. Email: valiant@stanford.edu. Gregory and Weihao’s contributions were supported by NSF CAREER Award CCF-1351108, and a research grant from the Okawa Foundation. ar X iv :1 60 2. 06 58 6v 1 [ cs .L G ] 2 1 Fe b 20 16

A: Recovering Structured Probability Matrices
****
Q: How do news sources tackle controversial issues? In this work, we take a data-driven approach to understand how controversy interplays with emotional expression and biased language in the news. We begin by introducing a new dataset of controversial and noncontroversial terms collected using crowdsourcing. Then, focusing on 15 major U.S. news outlets, we compare millions of articles discussing controversial and non-controversial issues over a span of 7 months. We find that in general, when it comes to controversial issues, the use of negative affect and biased language is prevalent, while the use of strong emotion is tempered. We also observe many differences across news sources. Using these findings, we show that we can indicate to what extent an issue is controversial, by comparing it with other issues in terms of how they are portrayed across different media.

A:
Controversy and Sentiment in Online News
****