Given a document, an entity and its sentiment towards the entity, verify if it is the correct sentiment towards the entity. Answer should be yes or no. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

Example Input: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Jennifer Lawrence is Positive . Actress Jennifer Lawrence  has a “pretty good speech” prepared for when  she  meets President Donald Trump.
Though the actress has never met Trump  she revealed in an interview last year that she had once come close to crossing paths with the president at a concert.  Lawrence  told the UK’s Graham Norton Show that  she  had been at a concert and heard Trump was in attendance  and ordered  her  security team to find the then-presidential candidate.
“Because I was adamant on finding  him  and then making a video of me going  ‘Hey Trump  f*ck you!'”  she  said then.
 Lawrence  has been a vocal critic of Trump since well before the November 2016 presidential election.
And just a few days after the election   Lawrence  penned an essay urging liberals to become energized by Trump’s victory.
 Lawrence  announced this year that  she  would take a hiatus from acting.  Her  last film  the horror thriller mother!  marked the worst opening-weekend box office of  her  career and earned a rare “F” CinemaScore from audiences.
 The actress  has also begun working with Represent.us  an organization working to end political corruption.
Example Output: yes

Example Input: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Clint Eastwood is Negative . In 1992  Clint Eastwoodâs  âUnforgivenâ won four Academy Awards and sent  his  career on an entirely new trajectory.
Yes  it was a Western and  Eastwood  had made plenty of those already but  âUnforgiven â was different. It had some action but mostly it was a bleak character study and was regarded by many as âart.â Whether intending to or  not Eastwood  had become an auteur.
In the wake of this critical and artistic breakthrough  Warner Brothers â  Eastwood âs exclusive distributor for  his  entire output as a director since  his  debut âPlay Misty for Meâ in 1971 â began to position not all but most of  his  future efforts as âOscar bait.â Thirteen of Eastwoodâs next 19 films came out in the fall â the highly-treasured time of year reserved for awards contenders. The six that were not released in autumn were low achievers such as âAbsolute Powerâ and âBlood Workâ and lightweight fluff like the senior citizen buddy comedy âSpace Cowboysâ and the bizarre misfire that was âJersey Boys.â
Warner Brotherâs long term  Eastwood  strategy paid off in spades. Since and including âUnforgiven â Eastwoodâs films have been nominated for 35 Oscars and have won 12 with  Eastwood himself  walking away with four as well as receiving the prestigious Irving G. Thalberg Memorial Award in 1994.
Less than a dozen people have won more Oscars than  Eastwood  and most of those were in technical categories. Not bad for a guy who used to co-star with monkeys.
Beginning in 2006 with âFlags of Our Fathersâ and âLetters from Iwo Jimaâ (shot at the same time but released three months apart)  Eastwoodâs choice of material started to change. The political content began to increase (âJ. Edgar â âInvictus â âGran Torinoâ) and although not overt it confirmed what many had known for a while:  Eastwood  was a conservative. While a moderate on most social issues   Eastwood  considers  himself  a âpragmatic Libertarianâ who eschews political correctness and  his  output in the last dozen years has indicated that  he âs an unabashed patriot.
While not a backer of most American Wars  he âs a staunch and unwavering supporter of armed service personnel  a point made with unmistakable clarity in âAmerican Sniper.â In addition to being the highest-grossing movie of 2014 and Eastwoodâs career  this throttling and unflinching bio-drama about the late Chris Kyle (Bradley Cooper) lit a welcomed fire under red state Middle America.  Eastwood  pulled off a delicate balancing act by crafting an inspirational  crowd-pleasing film that didnât pander while acknowledging the efforts of an American hero without addressing the war itself.
âThe 15:17 to Parisâ â the new movie about the three soldiers that thwarted the 2015 Thlys Train Attack â opens this Friday and it is the first  Eastwood  movie in at least 20 years that was not made available for advance press viewing.
Instead of hiring regular actors to portray the leads   Eastwood  cast the actual soldiers who confronted the terrorist â a bold move indeed and one sure to appeal to fans of âAmerican Sniper.â
Example Output: no

Example Input: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Kylo Ren is Negative . Of course the trailer includes an ominous monologue about "raw untamed power" (presumably from Supreme Leader Snoke to Kylo Ren) and later  Luke Skywalker warning Rey that the "raw strength" she possesses didn't scare him enough when he saw it in the past (presumably with Kylo Ren) but "it does now."
Yes  we get it.  Kylo Ren  and Rey are both super-powerful with the Force and likely have some hidden connection. Pretty much everyone sees that one coming from a mile away.
More interesting are the moments that do what great "Star Wars" movies have done best â reveal hidden depths in characters. Such is the case when we see  Kylo Ren 's anguished face as  he  contemplates following up  his  patricide in the previous film by murdering  his  mother (although a recent interview by Mark Hamill suggests General Leia will survive). Or when we see Rey being tortured (perhaps by the newly revealed Snoke?)  her body and face contorted in terrible pain. Or when we hear a tormented Luke Skywalker implore an unknown listener to recognize  "This is not going to go the way you think!"
Most powerful of all: When Rey says  "I need someone to show me my place in all this " and  Kylo Ren  offers an outstretched hand.
Example Output:
no