Categorize the comment on the basis of obscenity. If the comment is obscene output Yes, otherwise output No.

[EX Q]: How tin eared can the Republicant "leaders" be?  Alaskans (and Americans) want our elected officials to work together for the benefit of all - not ones who kowtow to the party's ideology!  It's like a bunch of little kids saying "if you're friends with him, you can't be my friend too."  Pathetic.
[EX A]: Yes

[EX Q]: This is a lousy comment; we should fix and help our community, not just move on! Also, there are no better places, this lousy stuff is going on everywhere!
[EX A]: No

[EX Q]: I'm probably a non-conformist on this thread - I don't oppose ethical wolf hunting as such, though I am thoroughly disgusted by the State's wolf "culling" operations.
However, this wolf was taken along after the pelt would have been completely past 'prime'; and I seriously doubt the hunter has any intentions of consuming wolf meat.  So the killing was a wasteful use of a State's resource that would have been much more beneficial alive.
And I don't think it particularly wise to allow the taking of wolves over bait for the same reason I object to the practice for bear:  Wolves are just as capable of becoming habituated as bears.
[EX A]:
No