Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.

Example Input: The NRA has become a progressively more despicable organization for decades

It's not just that they want lunatics to be able to purchase assault weapons at will (and to be able to make them full automatic through buying the conversion parts at gun shows), but they want no restrictions on such purchases at all. They wouldn't consider the fairest compromise to insure the safety of the public.

The government wanted to have a way to track the fertilizer of the sort used in the truck bomb to demolish the Murrah federal building in Oklahoma City, so that it could not be diverted to be used in domestic terrorist attacks.

It would have been quite simple. The fertilizer that could be used for such a purpose just needed chemical "tagging" so it could be identified by the source if it was misused.

The NRA successfully opposed that legislation. 

What has that got to do with the "Second Amendment?"

How does it feel to be a charter member of the "world's oldest profession," Paul?
Example Output: Yes

Example Input: With all due respect, this is nothing new. A judge who makes decisions about families, who can't come out of his self-imposed closet, is too full of drama in his own life to make balanced decisions. If he is using his sexual preferences to garner sympathy, today is perfect. However, it is not earth-shattering news to find out our society has bigots and racists. One has to understand that jumping on the victimhood wagon nowadays is looked at as more whining, because nobody is offering up anything to bring people together....just crying about being mistreated. Life is hard, and then we die.
Example Output: Yes

Example Input: Why? Is that so hard to believe? She not saying it's unique to natives but it is a fact and since we are discussing native foster care/adoption it is relevant. Your comments are racists. Are you who defensive that you can't even aknowledge a problem that does exist? Again not unique to natives - but certainly aren't exempt either. But this from a person who makes a distinction between neglect and abuse as if there is a difference!? Your true intelligence is showing along with your bigotry ...
Example Output:
No