We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

[EX Q]: Sent1: But life imprisonment without parole also deters the criminal from recommitting.
 Sent2: A life sentence does not prevent a murderer from murdering again.
[EX A]: Similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: So all in all I believe in the death penalty.
 Sent2: As far as I know, you may as well ACTUALLY believe any number of things, if you actually believe in the death penalty.
[EX A]: Not similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: An argument regarding the death penalty should be confined to discussions regarding those who have been wrongly convicted and sentenced to death.
 Sent2: Although there is much controversy about him, I agree that prisons, especially for those for whom the death penalty could be considered, should be punishment.
[EX A]:
Not similar