In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

Example Input: Comment: Stole the election huh?   More like had it handed to them by an incompetent bunch that arrogantly presumed it was theirs to keep.  For your edification, today's Democrats aren't your ( or my ) daddy's, and your trotting out the 1960's nostalgia file only underlines the point. Trump got elected in large measure because the Democrats are little better than Republicans( and worse in some aspects) when it comes to economic issues faced by your average voter. As a matter of fact, a number of well-knowns have made the case that Richard Nixon was our last truly "liberal"( you know, supporting all the good domestic stuff, Watergate excepted) president. Reviewing the record, I'd have to agree. Stick that in your partisan pipe and smoke it. 

"Trumplicans don't even support voting rights. They're un-American and fascists who love Putin."

Just substitute "communists" for "fascists" and you'd be right at home with Joe McCarthy. Your a true patriot.
Example Output: Non-identity-attack

Example Input: Comment: yea that's it. cuz we all know how many burny rallies were crashed by righties. oh wait, that didn't happen.
Example Output: Non-identity-attack

Example Input: Comment: Do you have a daughter? Do you believe in general mutilation? It's part of Sharia! Add that to the fact that Muslims do not want to assimilate, they demand conversion to Islam... - All of this simply proves your naivety. Islam is wrong, and totally destructive!
Example Output:
Identity-attack