We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Ex Input:
Sent1: Their argument is hardly valid, they want to stop the selling of firearms to people because they think it will decrease the crimes and school shootings along with other dangers that are caused by guns.
 Sent2: So if its cause people in high crime areas want to buy guns for protection then why do they only want protection against gun murders but not other crimes.

Ex Output:
Not similar


Ex Input:
Sent1: The opposite of "more guns = less crime is not true" is not "more guns = more crime".
 Sent2: You've accepted the first posit - that less guns will result in less gun killings.

Ex Output:
Not similar


Ex Input:
Sent1: ...and you are right, there is no credibility to a "needs based exercise of the right to keep and bear arms".
 Sent2: In order to have a 'well regulated' militia you can not bar the civilian populace of its right to keep and bear arms!

Ex Output:

Not similar