instruction:
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
question:
Not that this has anything to do with taxes, or unions, but – since Boozer brought it up – aren't we all pretty sure that educated is better than ignorant? And that people who run businesses are more likely to be educated than ignorant? If you'd like data on that one, The Kauffman Center for Entrepreneurship (kauffman.org), probably the most respected non-government source for information on entrepreneurship, has studies showing that 91% of successful entrepreneurs have college degrees.  Although, like another commenter here, I like the irony of "educated morons." And I'd never argue that there aren't a lot of ignorant people with degrees.
answer:
Yes


question:
Well, not exactly. The tax is meant to offset public health costs. The tax revenue rises and falls with the degree of consumption. If the tax reduces consumption, it's been successful, and the public health costs are decreased.
answer:
No


question:
So we understand, Chuck, you do support conflicts of interest then?
answer:

No