In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Input: Consider Input: Comment: "It does seem a little hypocritical for Dogwood to be complaining about Kinder Morgan playing a role in the B.C. election through its donations to the BC Liberals, when it is receiving money from the United States to fight for causes aligned with interests there. "
In one case, foreign interests donate money to advocacy groups.
In the other, foreign interests donate money to a political party whose members currently form the provincial government. 
Not even remotely equivalent, Gary, and tf. hardly hypocritical of Dogwood to complain about it.

Output: Non-obscene


Input: Consider Input: Comment: Obama failed in closing Guantanamo Bays prison, after two full terms. Was it his Bay of Pigs and did he learn? A question rarely asked and never answered. But hey, lets give him a Nobel and call it good!

Output: Non-obscene


Input: Consider Input: Comment: I don't believe a word this guy says. The taliban-ish beard doesn't help either. Is he back home ready to pursue acts of domestic terrorism?  If so, the wife and kids make good cover.


Output: Non-obscene