Categorize the comment on the basis of severe toxicity. If the comment is severely toxic output Yes, otherwise output No.

[EX Q]: Every one of the lawmakers who pushed this crap through should be prosecuted.
[EX A]: Yes

[EX Q]: Shootist, there are some very complicated issues with internet out in the Aleutians that those seeking cuts library subsidies are not aware of unless they live here: 1. With the hope of fiber optics coming through this area, we were missed, which means that the internet services here are so slow no one down loads movies on their laptop- it would take two days. Ie: my son once downloaded a gaming program and w/out me knowing it, took three days & $300. Anywhere else, this could have taken four hours. 2. When Shell Oil was recently going to station here they were highly concerned of the slow internet. Even the Mayor of Unalask/Dutch Harbor urged and lobbied for faster internet services- this was a definite block and a partial decision in not working in this area 3. Our library provides the fastest internet service that is available to the public. Due to this, local citizens have to go to the library to take tests for on line courses, complete grants, etc  or they could not function here
[EX A]: No

[EX Q]: I am with Richard on this one.  A bottle of Johnny Walker Red in an OLCC store is about $25.  In Seattle, it cost $36 after all the extra taxes.  And the supermarket offerings are very limited.  So they ended up with higher prices and less selection.  I am no fan of the OLCC but I don't see any compelling reason to change it.  I would like more of them to be open on Sunday, however.
[EX A]:
No