Given a paragraph about movies and a set of conversational questions and answers about the paragraph, say whether the passage contains sufficient information to answer the follow-up question. Say Yes if it is answerable; otherwise, say No. The paragraph has the prefix 'CONTEXT:'. Each conversation question has a prefix `Q:` followed by the answer prefix `A:`, and the follow-up question has a prefix `FOLLOWUP_Q:`.

Example Input: CONTEXT: Abaddon was a Knight Of Hell, thus a "Hired Gun" for Lucifer, since Lucifer was locked in "the Cage" in Hell, unable to walk the earth until the 2000s, when Sam was coerced into unlocking the seals. So in 1958 Abaddon was working for Lucifer and killed all the "Men of Letters".  <sep>  Q: Who hired Abaddon? A: Abaddon was a Knight Of Hell, thus a "Hired Gun" for Lucifer  Q: Why did Lucifer hire Abbadon in the first place? A: Lucifer was locked in "the Cage" in Hell, unable to walk the earth until the 2000s  Q: What happened in the 2000s? A: Sam was coerced into unlocking the seals  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: What else can you tell me about the series or Abbadon in general?
Example Output: Yes

Example Input: CONTEXT: It's hard to say because we really don't know what he's been doing exactly or why. He could be waiting for winter as he needs a way around/through the wall and waiting for the ocean near Eastwatch to freeze would allow him to walk around the wall. Or now that he "marked" Bran he is going to be able to break the magic barrier of the wall the same way he broke the barrier around the 3 eyed raven's cave. But a likely explanation is that him and his army simply move at the speed of plot. So he hasn't made it there because it's not time for that in the story and it's just a plot hole.  <sep>  Q: How is the night king not at the wall yet? A: It's hard to say because we really don't know what he's been doing exactly or why  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: True. It takes a long time for any background information to really come to light.
Example Output: Yes

Example Input: CONTEXT: He wants to destroy the symbol of the revolution. Think back to the end of the first film. Katniss saves Peeta's life by threatening to eat the poisonous berries, and thus kill them both. In doing so she forces the government's hand, making Snow look weak. Katniss then has to pretend to love Peeta, and this love is shown to the public. Snow even taunts her with it, knowing the love is false. But he doesn't reveal it publicly, because he knows he can use it against her. Katniss then becomes the face of the revolution. By showing Peeta switching sides, and by having him be the one to kill Katniss, Snow will regain his lost power. He will once again appear to be the man in charge. Part of this comes from the Quarter Quell, where Katniss (to the public at least) apparently abandons Peeta. It's also a massive personal and demoralising blow against Katniss. Even if Peeta fails, Snow hopes to break Katniss' spirit, and in doing so destroy her, and the revolution with it. He fails, because he doesn't count on Katniss actually coming to love Peeta.  <sep>  Q: Why did President Snow want to use Peeta to kill Katniss?
Example Output:
No