TASK DEFINITION: In this task, you're given a paragraph and title from the research paper. Your task is to classify whether the given title is suitable or not for the research paper based on the given paragraph. Return "True" if title is proper according to paragraph else "False".
PROBLEM: Paragraph: Community-acquired pneumonia is still a significant cause of morbidity and mortality and is often misdiagnosed and inappropriately treated. Although it can be caused by a wide variety of micro-organisms, the pneumococcus, atypicals, such as Mycoplasma pneumoniae and Chlamydophila pneumoniae, Staphylococcus aureus and certain Gram-negative rods are the usual pathogens encountered. The site-of-care decision is critical in determining the site and type of care as well as the extent of diagnostic workup. Antimicrobial therapy should be started as soon as possible particularly in those requiring admission to hospital, but typically the physician does not know with any degree of certainty the identity of the etiologic pathogen. A number of national guidelines have been published to help the physician with this choice. The initial drug(s) can be modified if necessary if the pathogen and its antimicrobial susceptibility pattern becomes known. Adjunctive therapy such as pressors and fluid replacement are of value and macrolides appear to help as well, likely secondary to their immunomodulatory effects. Recent data also suggest a role for steroids. 
 Title: Community-acquired pneumonia: An overview

SOLUTION: True

PROBLEM: Paragraph: This paper describes the molecular detection of respiratory viruses from nasopharyngeal flocked swabs (flocked swabs) and nasopharyngeal washes (washes) in a clinical setting. Washes and flocked swabs collected from children < 3 years old hospitalized with a lower respiratory tract infection were tested for parainfluenza virus 1-3, respiratory syncytial virus, influenza A and B and metapneumovirus (Group 1) and adenovirus, rhinovirus and coronavirus (Group 2) using realtime reverse transcriptase PCR (rRT-PCR). A consensuses standard was used to determine sensitivity and compare cycle thresholds (C T ) of washes and flocked swabs for each virus and group of viruses. Sensitivities ranged from 79 to 89% and 69 to 94% for flocked swabs and washes, respectively, excluding AdV which had a sensitivity of 35% for flocked swabs. When the flocked swabs and washes of Group 1 viruses were collected on the day of admission, the sensitivity of both sample types was 100%. Wash specimens had a lower C T value and higher sensitivity than flocked swabs; however there was no statistical difference in the sensitivity of a flocked swab (89%) versus wash (93%) for the detection of Group 1 viruses, particularly when samples were collected on the same day. Flocked swabs may be a useful alternative to washes for detection of respiratory viruses in clinical settings. 
 Title: Comparison of nasopharyngeal flocked swabs and nasopharyngeal wash collection methods for respiratory virus detection in hospitalized children using real-time polymerase chain reaction HHS Public Access

SOLUTION: False

PROBLEM: Paragraph: Objective: To examine pulmonary function, exercise capacity, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) among severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) survivors. Methods: We evaluated survivors with confirmed SARS at the Prince of Wales Hospital, Hong Kong, at 3, 6, and 12 months after symptom onset. Our assessment included: lung volume (total lung capacity [TLC], vital capacity, residual volume, functional residual capacity), spirometry (FVC, FEV 1 ), diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO), inspiratory and expiratory respiratory muscle strength, 6-min walk distance (6MWD), chest radiographs (CXRs), and HRQoL by Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form General Health Survey questionnaire. Results: Ninety-seven patients completed the serial assessments. There were 39 male and 58 female patients, and 63 patients (70%) were health-care workers (mean age, 36.9 years [SD, 9.5 years]; body mass index, 23.7 kg/m 2 [SD, 4.0 kg/m 2 ]). At 1 year, 27 patients (27.8%) had abnormal CXR findings. Four patients (4.1%), 5 patients (5.2%), and 23 patients (23.7%) had FVC, TLC, and DLCO values < 80% of predicted values, respectively. The 6MWD at 12 months was 511.0 m (SD, 89.8 m), which was higher than at 3 months (mean difference, 47.0 m; 95% confidence interval [CI], 31.8 to 62.1 m; p < 0.01) but not different from 6 months (mean difference, 9.7 m; 95% CI, ؊ 4.4 to 23.8 m; p ‫؍‬ 0.18). The 6MWD was lower than that for normal control subjects of the same age groups, and there was impairment of HRQoL at 12 months. Patients who required ICU admission (n ‫؍‬ 31) showed higher CXR scores (1.6 [SD, 3.1]; vs 0.4 [SD, 1.1]; p ‫؍‬ 0.04) and lower percentage of predicted FVC, TLC, and DLCO than those who did not, but there were no differences in 6MWD and health status. Conclusion: Significant impairment in DLCO was noted in 23.7% of survivors 1 year after illness onset. Exercise capacity and health status of SARS survivors were remarkably lower than those of a normal population. (CHEST 2005; 128:2247-2261) Key words: severe acute respiratory syndrome; lung function; functional capacity; quality of life Abbreviations: ANOVA ϭ analysis of variance; BMI ϭ body mass index; BOOP ϭ bronchiolitis obliterans organizing pneumonia; BP ϭ bodily pain; CI ϭ confidence interval; CPET ϭ cardiopulmonary exercise testing; CRP ϭ C-reactive protein; CXR ϭ chest radiograph; Dlco ϭ diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon dioxide; FEF 25-75 ϭ forced expiratory flow, midexpiratory phase; FRC ϭ functional residual capacity; GH ϭ general health; HCW ϭ health-care worker; HK ϭ Hong Kong; HRCT ϭ high-resolution CT; HRQoL ϭ health-related quality of life; IQR ϭ interquartile range; Kco ϭ diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon dioxide adjusted for alveolar volume; LDH ϭ lactate dehydrogenase; LOS ϭ length of stay; MH ϭ mental health; Pemax ϭ maximum static expiratory pressure; Pimax ϭ maximum static inspiratory pressure; PF ϭ physical functioning; RE ϭ role limitation due to emotional problems; RP ϭ role limitation due to physical problems; RV ϭ residual volume; SARS ϭ severe acute respiratory syndrome; SF ϭ social functioning; SF-36 ϭ Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form General Health Survey; TLC ϭ total lung capacity; Va ϭ alveolar volume; VC ϭ vital capacity; VT ϭ vitality; 6MWD ϭ 6-min walk distance; 6MWT ϭ 6-min walk test T he emergence of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) in Southern China in November 2002, followed by the global outbreak in 2003, caught the medical profession by surprise. 1-3 Studies on SARS-coronavirus viral loads have shown that peak viral levels were reached at the second week of illness when patients were receiving hospital care, and thus health-care workers (HCWs) were particularly prone to infection while caring for their patients. 4, 5 The morbidity of SARS is highlighted by the observation that even when there was only 10% of total lung field involved by consolidation, 50% of patients would require supplemental oxygen in order 
 Title: The 1-Year Impact of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome on Pulmonary Function, Exercise Capacity, and Quality of Life in a Cohort of Survivors* *From the Center for Emerging Infectious Diseases (Drs and Tam), and Diagnostic Radiology and Organ Imaging

SOLUTION:
False