In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Ex Input:
Comment: The authors of the  JJ report insist that homosexuality played no role in the abuse crisis, but their own data undermine this conclusion. For example, they plainly admit that “81% of the victims [between 1950 and 2002] were male,” and that 78% were post-pubescent.

So if the abusers weren’t pedophiles, and the victims were mostly adolescent males, wouldn’t that make the victimizers homosexuals?

What else could we possibly be talking about if not homosexuality?

Why can't you answer this question?

Ex Output:
Non-obscene


Ex Input:
Comment: Great point! That darn Obama, he granted amnesty to 3,000,000 illegal immigrants, banned assault weapons and secretly funded Iran against the law of the land! Oh wait, my mistake, that was Reagan.

Ex Output:
Obscene


Ex Input:
Comment: Haha, trapper's dodge?  Isn't it more like the dog owner dodging the law by allowing a dog off leash? If the law requires it in the area you are recreating, leash your darn dog. And no doubt the blame lies with the dog owner for not following the law in many cases of dogs that are killed and maimed in traps (which is a rare occurrence).

Ex Output:

Obscene