In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

[Q]: Sentence: Madonna fired her trainer because she couldn't stand her boyfriend.
 Reason: The 'her' refers to the trainer because she has been publicly linked to a man named John Rizzo. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
[A]: Wrong


[Q]: Sentence: The drain is clogged with hair. It has to be removed.
 Reason: The 'It' refers to the hair because the male is not able to get the female's attention. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
[A]: Wrong


[Q]: Sentence: In the storm, the tree fell down and crashed through the roof of my  house. Now, I have to get it removed.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the tree because the roof of house crashed and have to get it repaired. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
[A]:
Wrong