TASK DEFINITION: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.
PROBLEM: Comment: With a lot of Anchorage now stoned on pot , pills , and booze---with free unearned cash to pay for it all thanks to the PFD-----it's little wonder they think life is wonderful here. With a full PFD check Anchorage might have jumped up the charts to number one . Today's Alaskan's don't face life head on . They have to use drugs to get by.  Shame on us all for celebrating our drug culture .

SOLUTION: Non-sexual-explicit

PROBLEM: Comment: Ya know, I gotta say, I don't find it much comfort to hear that "well, other denominations are losing adherents too."  (As bad as the "well, other people abuse children too" with the implication that the hierarchy is somehow excused from the abuse and cover-up.)  The overall drift away from Catholicism and other Christian denominations suggests a bigger overall problem.  Christianity began and grew in the midst of a decadent secular Roman society, so frankly, it's not society's fault.  I can't help thinking too many supposed Christian leaders have become too wrapped up in trying to dominate society with secular power rather than leading by spiritual example.

SOLUTION: Non-sexual-explicit

PROBLEM: Comment: Here is a reasonable proposal, fund the bridge to nowhere with private bonds, which all the bridge supporters could fund. Somehow, I do not believe I would be purchasing any of these bonds. I did not contribute to a Nigerian Prince recovering his frozen millions either, despite the promised huge profits. Stupid I guess.

SOLUTION:
Non-sexual-explicit