In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: toxic and non-toxic. Toxicity is defiend as anything that is rude, disrespectful, or unreasonable that would make someone want to leave a converation.

[Q]: Comment: Looks the turd doesn't fall far from the ass.
[A]: Toxic


[Q]: Comment: Don't hold your breath. The hangover hasn't set in yet for them. They will ride it to the end not realizing the cuts in taxes won't apply to them; they won't be able to afford healthcare for themselves and family; manufacturing jobs and factories don't return and inflation hits. In time, trump will drag us back into a full on shooting war.
[A]: Non-toxic


[Q]: Comment: What growth? Growth fuelled by social welfare for new immigrants from tax dollars is what they want. GDP per capita has been, and is, declining = middle to low income earners (the majority) are all making less (income) and paying more (taxes/COLA). This is directly correlated with the substantial increase in immigration in the early 90's. Therefore, we have over two decades of economic statistics that show high immigration levels are directly correlated with worsening economics for middle to lower income earners (the majority). Also directly correlated with widening income gap, where the very wealthy get even wealthier.

With 6.5 million youth entering the job market in the next decade and only 5 million boomers who may (not will) retire and reduce consumption, there is already labour oversupply coming. After that decade, demographics start to balance again UNLESS you want vast labour oversupply to depress wages and human rights - then you propose high immigration levels.
[A]:
Non-toxic