In this task, you're given two sentences. Indicate if the first sentence clearly entails the second sentence (i.e., one can conclude the 2nd sentence by reading the 1st one). Indicate your answer with '1' if the first sentence entails the second sentence, otherwise answer with '0'.

Ex Input:
Sentence 1: Councilman Pierce said he was advised that the car belonged to James Clark, 68, an acquaintance of the Jones family. Sentence 2: Councilman Pierce owns a car.

Ex Output:
0


Ex Input:
Sentence 1: There are actually good grounds to believe that legalization would reduce the costs of respiratory damage from marijuana smoking by encouraging the development of better smoke filtration technology, the substitution of more potent, less smoke-producing varieties of marijuana, and the substitution of oral preparations for smoked marijuana. Sentence 2: Drug legalization has benefits.

Ex Output:
1


Ex Input:
Sentence 1: Controversy and discussion erupted on internet forums on 28 February 2007, when publicity was given to Essjay, a prominent Wikipedia administrator and editor, having claimed false credentials which were published in a magazine. Internet encyclopedia Wikipedia co-founder Jimbo Wales was travelling in India, and at 06:42 on March 3 he issued a statement that further information had come to his attention and he had asked the editor to resign his positions of trust within the community. At 03:17 on March 4 Essjay announced on his user talk page that he had retired and was no longer active on Wikipedia. Sentence 2: Wikipedia was launched by Jimbo Wales.

Ex Output:

1