We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Example Input: Sent1: If you support the death penalty and concede that an innocent man could be put to death, you must be willing to put your name in the hat, with every one else, to have the government execute you by mistake.
 Sent2: Even though you deny it, your statements show you have no problem executing innocent people.
Example Output: Similar

Example Input: Sent1: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time.
 Sent2: That right to life was taken away, I agree, but we will not accomplish anything if we kill someone else.
Example Output: Not similar

Example Input: Sent1: If they know they'll die if caught, they'll likely kill more rape victims and children.
 Sent2: If a person just raped someone (this is just an example) they shouldn't be killed for it, but something like a mass murdering or serial killing should be dealt with by putting them to death.
Example Output:
Not similar