We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gay Marriage) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gay marriage. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gay marriage.

Ex Input:
And since they claim HIV/AIDS is a consequence of being gay, do they want  to increase the risk of infection for straight women by insisting that such women be the only marriage partners gay men are allowed to have?

Ex Output:
Valid


Ex Input:
It WILL take a Constitutional amendment for it to say that homosexuals are less than equal.

Ex Output:
Valid


Ex Input:
POTS and kettles dude since this is my thread and the topic of aids has nothing to do with why people think that they have the right to vote on my marriage.

Ex Output:

Valid