Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.

Ex Input:
You're a day late and a dollar short,   many agencies have seen 30 percent cuts.   Keep up will ya?

Ex Output:
No


Ex Input:
Actual reality politics in this country aside (i.e "It's never going to happen"), the Parliamentary systems of Britain, Israel, Japan, Germany etc. where multiple political parties exist and can have an actual 'piece of the action' to the extent of sometimes getting to be in charge of a portion of the actual Governmental Administration or at least real input on some pending legislation or governmental policies is at least superficially attractive.  

The ability to hang up everything to get your own way by one or more minorities is both the strength and the weakness of those systems, however. 

 Just as the 2/3 Senate super-majority requirement for some things is for our system.

Ex Output:
No


Ex Input:
Just make sure that not one watt goes to mining, not one public penny either. Never. Donlin Gold  
(Barrick and Nova Gold) will use appoximately the same amount of natural gas (for instance) as Anchorage. Check the really awful human rights and environmental record of such companies who would come here to mine and use hydroelectricity. They would make a large take-home-out-of-Alaska profit if they could use hydroelectricity (at our land, water and state budget expense). Tell them to repair the lives, lands and waters they've damaged before they ever come here. Why was Jim Bowles, a Conoco Phillips executive on the board of the Nature Conservancy in a time of climate change? There should be an adversarial relationship between those trying to save the earth and those whose activities would destroy it. Are there mining executives on the board now?

Ex Output:

No