In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Q: Comment: It's the Republican ethos--"just grab 'em by the pussy"--and the rich get what they want at the expense of everything and everyone else.

A: Sexual-explicit
****
Q: Comment: Trid sees nothing wrong with "No Dogs or Jews", "We don't serve Muslims" and so on. He supports bigotry. And no, that is NOT a straw man, but the clear and obvious implication of your " If either the buyer or the seller does not want to enter into that contract for whatever reason then I believe they have the right to refuse." Thank you for proving that your claim to being a Christian is a complete sham.

A: Non-sexual-explicit
****
Q: Comment: Not exactly sure what you are saying but - the way the liberal / democrat mind works, if you DIDN'T show up for Obama's party you would have been considered 'racist'....

Protesting and not going to Trumps inauguration is the Lefts child like way of showing their continuing arrogance, ignorance and divisiveness..

A:
Non-sexual-explicit
****