The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.
--------
Question: Context: 'Same! I try to go every other weekend.' 'Oh cool. What supplies do you prefer to take the most of?' 'I do a lot of hiking mostly, love to take scenic photos. I usually carry food and water supplies?'
Utterance: 'Me too. I am not good at hunting or fishing. So I generally try to take extra food'

Answer: No


Question: Context: 'hi there! ready to go hiking? Where will you be going, I'll be going to NY, the Catskills mountains.' 'yes im ready rocky mountains ' 'awesome! I love the rockies. So let's try and divy up our extra supplies then. Personally, I feel that I'd need the most extra food, as I'm a rather large guy and plan to go hiking a lot during this time. Firewood would be nice, so I could have a big bonfire. What are your prefernces? '
Utterance: 'i need food the most since there will be my kids and I. I can give up my firewood for food'

Answer: Yes


Question: Context: 'I would rather let you have the third water than other food. I don't like fish. ☹️' 'Okay, you can have two firewood and and two food, I'll take the rest.' 'Ok. That seems fair enough to me.'
Utterance: 'Looks like we have a deal!'

Answer:
No