In this task, you're given a paragraph and title from the research paper. Your task is to classify whether the given title is suitable or not for the research paper based on the given paragraph. Return "True" if title is proper according to paragraph else "False".

[EX Q]: Paragraph: Executive summary Suicide mortality Suicide attempts Health system and societal risk factors Community and relationship risk factors What protects people from the risks of suicide? The current situation in suicide prevention What are countries doing about suicide prevention now? Current legal status of suicide around the world and perspectives for change How can countries create a comprehensive national strategy and why is it useful? How can progress be tracked when evaluating a national suicide prevention strategy? The cost and cost-effectiveness of suicide prevention efforts The way forward for suicide prevention What can be done and who needs to be involved? Forging a way forward What does success look like? Key messages REFERENCES ANNEXES Annex 1. Estimated numbers and rates of suicide by sex and age, 2000 and 2012 Annex 2: WHO Member States grouped by WHO Region and average income per capita 
 Title: WHO Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data CONCEPTUALIZATION AND GUIDANCE
[EX A]: True

[EX Q]: Paragraph: Newton's Principia introduces four rules of reasoning for natural philosophy. Although useful, there is a concern about whether Newton's rules guarantee truth. After redirecting the discussion from truth to validity, I show that these rules are valid insofar as they fulfill Goodman's criteria for inductive rules and Newton's own methodological program of experimental philosophy; provided that cross-checks are used prior to applications of rule 4 and immediately after applications of rule 2 the following activities are pursued: (1) research addressing observations that systematically deviate from theoretical idealizations and (2) applications of theory that safeguard ongoing research from proceeding down a garden path. # 
 Title: Do Newton's rules of reasoning guarantee truth . . . must they?
[EX A]: False

[EX Q]: Paragraph: To examine data in support of the viral hypothesis of atopic disease. Data Sources: We retrieved review articles and original research from MEDLINE, OVID, and PubMed (1950-June 2009) that addressed our topic of interest, using the terms respiratory virus, asthma, IgE, atopy, and viral-induced wheeze. Study Selection: Articles were selected for their relevance to viruses and their role in asthma. Much of the data in support of the viral role in asthma focuses on rhinovirus and respiratory syncytial virus. Epidemiologic studies have used factors such as day-care and family size as surrogates for infection in studies that support and negate the role of viruses in the development of asthma. A large volume of literature supports the theory that virus exacerbates preexisting asthma by setting off the inflammatory cascade. No mechanistic studies fully explain how viral infections can translate or exacerbate atopic disease. We provide information from our mouse model that suggests that dendritic cells, IgE, and FcRI are critical to the induction of atopy. Studies of patients taking antiviral agents (eg, ribavirin or palvizumab) support the notion that interfering with respiratory viral infections may decrease the development of atopy. Conclusions: Many studies suggest strongly that viral infections may predispose patients to the development of asthma and other atopic diseases. Further, mechanistic studies are necessary to allow for the development of targeted therapeutics to prevent the translation of viral into atopic disease. 
 Title: The role of viruses in the development and exacerbation of atopic disease
[EX A]:
False