In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: insult and non-insult. Insult is any lanugage or act that is disrespectful or scornfully abusive.

[EX Q]: Comment: Here you people are, following just what the dem. leaders and the main stream press want you to focus on. Meanwhile, we are getting closer to a war with Russia, the US could easily be heading for an economic collapse, our citizens are at war with police and our citizens are at war with each other using hate and fear directed by the leaders of both parties. The dems. are doing everything they can to demonize anyone who does not support HRC, and the voters are going along with what they are expected to do. Most refuse to either admit or acknowledge they are being used, but just look at yourselves, getting all worked up over who said what, who did what, and not paying any attention to what is really happening in the world. The dems. are leading us into war people, study up on it, quit being told where to focus your attention. We need, more then ever, someone who can negotiate with the Russians and not lead us into war. That is not the war monger HRC.
[EX A]: Non-insult

[EX Q]: Comment: I thought esoterica was your word? And yes, I have read Augustine on curiositas. But these discussions have nothing to do with the alleged incident, which seems to be a nothing. The cops are alleged to have been called, are alleged to have seen something, we know not what, and the tabloids allege with no evidence that the Vatican is rocked by the incident. You seem to be withdrawing even your earlier details about several groups of men involved in sex, etc. Now I am told to google if I want to know more!
[EX A]: Non-insult

[EX Q]: Comment: Stalin_was_not_a_real_socialist._He_was_a_bureaucratic_authoritarian._Socialism_is_worker_control_(like_Land_o_Lakes),_not_state_control.
[EX A]:
Non-insult