Categorize the comment on the basis of obscenity. If the comment is obscene output Yes, otherwise output No.

Input: Consider Input: Mea culpa on the comment relating to a move from an area near the tracks to the South Hills.  It was an unnecessary little anti-elitist "dig" and I apologize.  I do realize a lot of the folks in the South Hills have had their homes for decades and bought them for a mere fraction of what they're worth now.  Of course all that increased value does is impact your property taxes (up to the time of Measure 5).  Our little farm is worth about 20 times what we paid for it in 1971.  That's a "so what" unless we're willing to "sell out the farm."  Like those many folks in the South Hills, we're not ready to do that.  

regards, Gary

Output: No


Input: Consider Input: Reminds my a lot of Reganomics, give the rich all they desire and it all trickles down and floats all our little boats.

Output: No


Input: Consider Input: Careful reading would show who introduced the word encourage into the conversation, thus saving you the trouble of thinking someone else did it. The good news is, even if the Springfield city council approves this ordinance, you'll still be able to give as much and as often as you wish to each and every panhandler you encounter when visiting that fair city. You'll just have to get out of your car to do it, or park and hail the stranded soul to approach your car. Should that inconvenience trump your quotient for compassion, you could always just throw the money on the ground and continue on your way, confident that your handout will be scooped up and save you the possible littering fine. By the way, those of us who don't live in Springfield really don't have any business telling those who do how to conduct theirs.


Output: No