In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine the neutral choice based on your inference from the statement and your commonsense knowledge. The neutral choice is a sentence that neither agrees nor disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3', corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence. If sentence X agrees with sentence Y, one's correctness follows from the other one. If sentence X disagrees with sentence Y, they can not be correct at the same time.
--------
Question: Statement: France was developing a national identity of optimism, a high level of social critique, and constant pressure for improvement. Choices: 1. Things were changing for the better in France. 2. France's national identity had become more conservative, focusing on the glories of the past rather than facing the troubles of today. 3. The sense of optimism and pressure for improvement would lead to better living conditions for the poor.

Answer: 3


Question: Statement: for TV coverage it's pitiful Choices: 1. It was excellent for TV coverage. 2. They didn't do enough interviews on the ground. 3. It wasn't good as far as TV coverage goes.

Answer: 2


Question: Statement: Finally, as greenhouse gas emissions are projected to grow exponentially in the developing world in the next two decades, we must evaluate the costs of imposing domestic reductions as a very high cost against potentially low-cost opportunities for mitigating and sequestering carbon emissions in the developing world. Choices: 1. Greenhouse gas emissions are estimated to grow in both the developing and developed worlds. 2. Greenhouse gas emissions from the developing world are non-existent and can be discarded. 3. Lowering greenhouse gas emissions from the developing world would greatly reduce global warming.

Answer:
3