In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

Ex Input:
Comment: The first option contains way too much common sense to ever be implemented by a Liberal government, or even a conservative one in this country. 

We are supposed to shut up as the government continues to import thousands of people who hate western society and are looking for ways to kill us. On top of that, we're supposed to shut up as they bring in tens of thousands illegal immigrants that will at the very least cost billions of dollars in tax payer money, and at the very worst cost a loss of life. 

Globalists won't be happy until Canada is just a colony of China....which it will be in the coming 40-50 years. The White Man is the devil for colonizing Canada hundreds of years ago and developing one of the most prosperous nations the world has ever seen - never forget that!

Ex Output:
Identity-attack


Ex Input:
Comment: Quote: "Michelle Obama is taking some heat for recent remarks she made on gender, but I'm struggling to muster outrage given the sheer incoherence of what she actually said."

True, I've rarely found what Michelle says coherent, but I suspect that what she's saying is primarily directed at black communities. She could have gone much further and bluntly stated that blacks coddle far too much the criminality and paternal irresponsibility in black males. (I won't call them men.) That's glaringly obvious and different from mostly white schools where ordinary boyishness is attacked as "toxic masculinity."

Ex Output:
Identity-attack


Ex Input:
Comment: Is this really what we've come to? This is so silly. Over-sensitivity and political correctness run amok.

Ex Output:

Non-identity-attack