We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

[Q]: Amendment recognizes an individual right, even if it further declared the right to be ���fundamental��� (which it should be), would still not be a doomsday decision for gun control proponents.
[A]: Valid


[Q]: If you need guns to ensure that your government doesn't become corrupt or tyranical you wouldn't want them to know where the guns are, would you?
[A]: Valid


[Q]: Isn't the right to bear arms carved in the Constitution tablets that Jefferson brought down from Capitol Hill?
[A]:
Valid