In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Comment: If these pipelines are successfully blocked we could be seeing the beginning of the  end for confederation as we know it.  It is not as if those against pipelines are actually acting as if they are concerned about the environment. They still want al the advantages  of oil. The store shelves would be empty without oil.  Then there are those that go home and heat their homes and cook using the dirtiest fuel  called wood and or biomass.  ( it should be BioMESS)
Non-obscene

Comment: Being registered in multiple states is one thing. Actually voting in the same election more than once is a much bigger issue. 

You should really try a little harder. Comparing anyone to Hitler is a weak attempt to win an arguement. If you really think President Trump is comparable to one of the biggest killers in history you should do a little self reflection.
Non-obscene

Comment: I really cannot believe Denver City Council passed this ordinance. 

I have lost all faith in Denver leadership. This was the last straw. 

How can anyone believe that harboring ILLEGAL aliens that are CONVICTED criminals is a good idea? Give me one reason how this is good for Denver. Do you like paying for these illegals court fees and food/shelter? Because that is exactly the consequence of this ordinance.

Non-obscene