instruction:
Categorize the comment on the basis of toxicity. If the comment is toxic (harmful, malicious, derogatory, threat, insult, identity attck, etc.) output Yes, otherwise output No.
question:
The problem is the voters,  because we love to obsess about the most irrelevant crap, and then vote accordingly. Guess what? Then we are stuck with some real losers for politicians.

So if you are one of the freaks that think the whole world needs to stay up all night and worry about abortion, regulated weed, thinking that all of society should take a dude with a beard in a dress serious about wanting to squat to piss instead of stand, or the idiots debating global warming on both sides. Thanks, feel free to go look in the mirror when you want to blame anyone. Feel free to take the race card groups, and blind military supporters with you.
answer:
Yes


question:
We're still waiting for you to post a rational and civil comment, Obooba.
answer:
No


question:
Unlike Sen. Mark Kirk (R-IL, who issued a statement saying he would not back his party’s nominee for president:

I have spent my life building bridges and tearing down barriers–not building walls. That’s why I find Donald Trump’s belief that an American-born judge of Mexican descent is incapable of fairly presiding over his case is not only dead wrong, it is un-American…

It is absolutely essential that we are guided by a commander-in-chief with a responsible and proper temperament, discretion and judgment. Our President must be fit to command the most powerful military the world has ever seen, including an arsenal of thousands of nuclear weapons. After much consideration, I have concluded that Donald Trump has not demonstrated the temperament necessary to assume the greatest office in the world."
answer:

No