In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

[Q]: Comment: Having someone stick a "foreign" object up your vagina or butt isn't consensual, Jackson.  Perhaps in your world it may be consensual.  Good gawd, where's your empathy for the victim?
[A]: Sexual-explicit


[Q]: Comment: You do realize I'm sure that HRC campaign has successfully used fear to control the loyal subjects of the dem. party. It really is sad to see just how easy these voters are manipulated. She has disdain for her supporters but they refuse to allow that into their narrow vision.  DT has a unsavory past with his words. HRC has a corrupted past. However her ardent supports find more fault with mere words then they do with actions because the actions were committed by a dem. Pitiful that we have come to this point. You know, Nixon had to resign due to his cover-up, how many more cover-ups is HRC involved in? But again, since she has a "D" behind her name the ignorant dem. voters will either ignore, or more likely,  condone the criminal. The good news, her day is coming where she will be held accountable, the bad news, if she is elected first we get that insane Kaine. WLTDO, question for you, do you think the puppets even bother to read the leaks? I don't, they haven't been told to.
[A]: Non-sexual-explicit


[Q]: Comment: First of all, the death of the runner is tragic. Period. However, all of this knee jerk, gotta-change-something-now reactionary posturing from the risk adverse members of our community is a waste of time and energy. The likelyhood of this kind of thing happening again is exceedingly remote. Making drastic changes to race protocols is both unnecessary and unwarranted. History proves it. Lightening strikes once in awhile. Onward.
[A]:
Non-sexual-explicit