Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.

Example Input: I can't help but wonder what other "software" tools are being used in Alaska by police and the "criminal justice system?"  See for example what's happening elsewhere:

"The new way police are surveilling you: Calculating your threat ‘score’"

https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/public-safety/the-new-way-police-are-surveilling-you-calculating-your-threat-score/2016/01/10/e42bccac-8e15-11e5-baf4-bdf37355da0c_story.html

=and=

"Why Government Use of Social Media Monitoring Software Is a Direct Threat to Our Liberty and Privacy"

https://www.aclu.org/blog/speak-freely/why-government-use-social-media-monitoring-software-direct-threat-our-liberty-and
Example Output: Yes

Example Input: I've worked in public contracting for over a decade, as a contract manager for m employer, and as a community partner with it other  jurisdictions including Portland and Multnomah County. I have been dismayed, pretty much every time I've participated in Portland and Multnomah County, to find how they consistently fail to comply with state public bidding rules. My experience is that they know who they want to give the money to and they do with little to no fair access, they rarely articulate measurable outcomes, rarely monitor contracts t be sure taxpayers money is well spent, and almost never introduce consequences when contractors fail to perform. I often hear from people/businesses who would like to contract with the city or county who feel completely shut out of the process.
Example Output: No

Example Input: Except the selfish amazing dickheads that left him to die. What arrogance
Example Output:
Yes