In this task, you're given a statement, and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence clearly disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3' corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.

Statement: It would be sheer folly for such a company to invent preposterous lies and spins and feed them to the nation's most prominent publications. Choices:  1. The company's bet route of action would be to make up a bunch of lies. 2. It wouldn't be smart for a company to produce a bunch of lies. 3. Producing a bunch of lies would cost the company loyal customers.
1

Statement: But he is funny.  Choices:  1. He has a good sense of humor. 2. He is a good friend to hang out with. 3. He is dull and boring.
3

Statement: The risk of improper payments increases in programs with (1) complex criteria for computing payments, (2) a significant volume of transactions, or (3) emphasis on expediting payments. Choices:  1. There's no risk to improper payments in any program. 2. Programs with lots of transactions risk improper payments.  3. It's preferred to limit the number of transactions to make the risk reduced. 

1