We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Q: Sent1: So should we be able to impose the sentence of life without parole, all the while understanding that we may have put an innocent man in prison for life?
 Sent2: Given the scrutiny of death penalty cases, it seems that we would be more likely to lock someone up for life in prison and never uncover their innocence than we are to execute an innocent person.

A: Similar
****
Q: Sent1: The death penalty has never been shown to be a deterent to murder.
 Sent2: There is absolutely ZERO evidence that the death penalty deters crime.

A: Similar
****
Q: Sent1: Currently, the death penalty is lawful in the US, therefore it cannot be defined as murder.
 Sent2: Death penalty is then in this case a lawful murder.

A:
Similar
****