In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Ex Input:
Comment: Strada- Your hatred of all things Democratic exceed your love of country.  It has blinded you to reality, unfortunately.  Jr. willfully went into a meeting with a foreign national seeking to obtain material support for his father's candidacy.  That is illegal, in violation of campaign finance laws.  It does NOT MATTER whether he actually received the support, the intent is what matters.  I am sure that right now if the shoe was on the other foot and this is Hillary's campaign who was accused of such matters (with a slam dunk email trail to prove it) you would be defending her tooth and nail about how the R's are just trying to overturn her lawful election, right?
As Foster has said, the election CANNOT be overturned.  Trump may eventually be impeached (or my guess, resign) but president Pence can be bad for you can it?  Politically I'd prefer 4 years of useless Trump, but I also know that that would be catastrophic for our country, so I'll choose what good for the nation, not my party.

Ex Output:
Non-obscene


Ex Input:
Comment: Morneau is using the left wing buzzword "fair".  Thus whole exercise is about inflamming opinion in the hope that the " soak the rich" crowd votes liberal instead of ndp, which makes your position particularly hypocritical

Ex Output:
Non-obscene


Ex Input:
Comment: There is no place in our school system for the recognition of those darn "Christina" holidays.

Ex Output:

Obscene