In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.
--------
Question: Comment: You are all of you so stupid. Where was the dog? The dog was on his owners property. The shooter broke the law, the shooter was not in danger. The shooter aimed at a sitting still dog. The dog had a shock collar that kept it inside the property. The shooter should be charged with destruction of property, harassment, and unlawful discharge of a weapon in city limits. Throw the GOD DAMN BOOK AT HIM!

Answer: Obscene


Question: Comment: If you feel that the gains in gender equality (If they were gains and not just part of the culture before the revolution) negates the starvation, lack of basic luxuries freely obtainable in the west, loss of freedom and the reintroduction of slavery - the gulags were labour camps after all where people not only worked without wages in the worst conditions in the frozen tundra without adequate sustenance- then perhaps you should re-examine your priorities.  How many Soviet leaders were female?

Answer: Non-obscene


Question: Comment: Dammit George,  you're making me thirsty.

Answer:
Obscene