In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Example Input: Comment: Oh yes, Arliss Sturgulewski.  Born Jane Wright, but I guess no one would remember that name as opposed to Arliss Sturgulewski.  Anyway, I digress.  Joe Vogler's halfway respectable showing in 1986 had much to do with Sturgulewski making it clear that she wanted nothing to do with anyone who supported any of her primary opponents.  Here in Fairbanks, the few supporters she had in 1990 were the same little coffee klatsch of liberal Republicans who would meet regularly to plot against the rest of the party.  Incidentally, one of that group wound up in Parnell's cabinet, but I likewise digress.  That same group later brought us the equally-as-disastrous choice of Jim Campbell.
Example Output: Non-sexual-explicit

Example Input: Comment: Yes I do, but sexually assaulting a 14 year old boy is the 8th degree if Gacey is the 10th.
Example Output: Sexual-explicit

Example Input: Comment: Molesting children is NOT approved of in the Bible nor in our own society. In fact in the old days we all know what they would have done to a man who molested a child.
Example Output:
Sexual-explicit