TASK DEFINITION: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.
PROBLEM: Comment: Trid sees nothing wrong with "No Dogs or Jews", "We don't serve Muslims" and so on. He supports bigotry. And no, that is NOT a straw man, but the clear and obvious implication of your " If either the buyer or the seller does not want to enter into that contract for whatever reason then I believe they have the right to refuse." Thank you for proving that your claim to being a Christian is a complete sham.

SOLUTION: Non-sexual-explicit

PROBLEM: Comment: Isn't this normal for a physical?  I'm sure the doctor rubs the guys testicles and turns their head to cough.  Not like the sergeant is doing the exam.

SOLUTION: Sexual-explicit

PROBLEM: Comment: Guiliani is obviously the right choice for Secretary of State. 

Ibbitson is making a fool of himself with petty insults, and given that he is batting 1000 in being wrong...why ruin his perfect record ?

SOLUTION:
Non-sexual-explicit