In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

[Q]: Comment: PM Trudeau and his Liberals in Canada don't seem to care if Canadian-made armoured vehicles are shipped to Sunni Saudi Arabia and used to suppress, kill and injure Shia and other Muslim protesters.

So what's the problem?
[A]: Identity-attack


[Q]: Comment: Upon what evidence do you base your opinion that her response was "phony?"  Or that it was "outrage?"  The outrage that YOU are expressing shows an appalling lack of sensitivity on your part.  Why defend rudeness?
[A]: Non-identity-attack


[Q]: Comment: Emily, though I agree with Tebow and not the other guy, this is thin gruel.
You say Tebow was supported, but Kap(whatever) was criticized. How facile.
The Leftists anti-religionists howled about Tebow, and Black Americans - far more than just the Black Lives Matters thugs, support the anti-police, anti-white supremacist (again, whatever) kneelers, whom - you might have noticed - are overwhelmingly Black (or African American or . . . you know).
[A]:
Identity-attack