In this task, you're given a statement, and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence clearly disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3' corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.

Ex Input:
Statement: and they they were you know they were they were pretty much without having to say it they were pretty much Mets fans Choices:  1. They did not even have to say they were fans, to know they liked the Mets. 2. They were dressed in all Mets attire. 3. You could tell they did not like the Mets. 

Ex Output:
3


Ex Input:
Statement: The individualist ideal in America lives side by side with powerful notions of racial obligation. Choices:  1. The individualist ideal and powerful notions of racial obligation struggle to coexist in America. 2. Neither the individualist ideal or powerful notions of racial obligation exist in America. 3. There are powerful notions of racial obligation.

Ex Output:
2


Ex Input:
Statement: It is strange, however, that when Greider himself turned his attention from money politics to the global economy, he ended up relying for technical advice mainly on--you guessed it--Milliken's protege Prestowitz. Choices:  1. Greider relied on technical advice after he switched from money politics to the global scale. 2. Prestowitz provided the best technical advice for Greider in terms of the global economy. 3. Greider did not turn to any outside source for technical advice in terms of the global economy.

Ex Output:

3