In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Example Input: Comment: Pope Francis lets the whole world see who he is and tells the whole world what he thinks. I don't always agree with him, but I think the phrase "holy whore" is more appropriate for those who talk tough behind pseudonyms.
Example Output: Obscene

Example Input: Comment: Your San Francisco ass will be saved by your dog, not by your spray.  Too bad for your dog, but thank goodness the bear and the San Franciscan won't be hurt.  You'll just buy a new dog to scatter his guts to save your ass.
Example Output: Obscene

Example Input: Comment: There is no power in protest.  This is a direct result of its overuse as a tactic by the left of center in Western democracies since 1968.  Martin Luther King led the last legitimate protest movement in America. It is worth going over the footage to see his protesters decorum and focus with the anarchic and vulgar protest of today. This is without even going into the substance of the issues. Voting rights versus ... a wage roll back for teachers?, not getting government cash for your disease?, anger at losing a Presidential election? 
The comparisons are pathetic and the conclusion is evident - protest as a means of power in a democracy has de-legitimized itself into irrelevance.
It's just a parade with bad slogans and sometimes a giant puppet show. Democracy requires more.
Example Output:
Non-obscene