In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

Example Input: Comment: Sullivan, Koch  griffin, Evans do we need to say more. Sullivan Figure it out you left us with a huge deficit , unfinished projects and terrible labor relations. You used Ernie Hall to attack labor. You are using Griffin now. You sir are definitely NOT you dad! Take your golden spoon and close mouth around it and please stay out of our business, You had your chance and you blew it.
Example Output: Non-identity-attack

Example Input: Comment: The economy has been on a record upswing, building the Permanent Fund to where it is today ... and sooner or later, it will fall into a record downswing.  There may be no Permanent Fund earnings for some years to come, it may even lose over half of its value ... and then what?  The fund lost 3 billion in January, but was rescued in a temporary market correction.  Our legislators are foolish children, playing with fire ... and it is the people who will get burned.  On top of that, the fund lost two of the most competent managers it has ever had, who had overseen the biggest single growth in the history of the fund ... all because the legislators saved a few pennies by not giving them a decent raise or bonus.
Example Output: Non-identity-attack

Example Input: Comment: My guess is the same reason blonds say stupid things, especially ones that are still wet behind the ears. Just an observation.
Example Output:
Identity-attack