In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine the neutral choice based on your inference from the statement and your commonsense knowledge. The neutral choice is a sentence that neither agrees nor disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3', corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence. If sentence X agrees with sentence Y, one's correctness follows from the other one. If sentence X disagrees with sentence Y, they can not be correct at the same time.

Example Input: Statement: New illumination was installed in 1985 to light up the tower from within, and it was the obvious main focus of France's celebrations for the change of the millennium in 1999. Choices: 1. The New Illumination was installed to light up the Eiffel Tower.   2. The New Illumination was not in place to celebrate the new millennium.   3. The New Illumination was the main focus for the new millennium celebrations.  
Example Output: 1

Example Input: Statement: Accordingly, sections 203 and 204 of the act, which require agencies to consult with small governments and solicit input from State, local, and tribal governments, are also inapplicable. Choices: 1. Sections two hundred three and two hundred four are inapplicable. 2. Sections five hundred and five hundred one are inapplicable, sections 203 and 204 are fine though. 3. The sections of the act required extensive changes.
Example Output: 3

Example Input: Statement: yes now that there there's some wonderful Christian music when you can find good stations uh the problem problem that i found um in this area is that the Choices: 1. There is bad Christian music on some stations. 2. There isn't any good christian music.  3. When you can find good stations you can find some good Christian music.
Example Output:
1