Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.

Input: Consider Input: Funny that the cake  case should be brought up by this writer.  Local and state  laws force religious dissenters who don't want their product  in a homosexual ceremony that their genuine religious beliefs find disgusting and abhorrent, and against their beliefs but the Obama EEOC just ruled that Muslim Somali drivers who took jobs as delivery drivers can refuse to carry liquor    based on the very religious beliefs the States, and local laws deny the religious dissenters. 

So one set of rules for Muslims and another for Christians here in freedom loving America founded by peoples seeking religious freedom?

No double standard here?

Output: Yes


Input: Consider Input: "Leave your entitled attitude behind when you leave anchorage. Drivers out here are not accustomed to this and are not expecting it."

"We are constantly ran off sidewalks by riders speeding by. The entitled attitudes are not endearing."

Seems that everyone believes that bicyclists are behaving "entitled".  I side with the sidewalk pedestrians.  Bikes are vehicles that belong on the roads.  The car drivers should leave their entitled attitudes at home.  Better yet, they should get their fat butts on a bicycle since most of them need the exercise.

Output: Yes


Input: Consider Input: Question: How many dollars worth of state, muni, borough and school district contracts has GCI had in the last 10 years? Keep the spending going to keep GCI afloat.


Output: No