Given a document, an entity and its sentiment towards the entity, verify if it is the correct sentiment towards the entity. Answer should be yes or no. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

Q: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Watch Trump is Neutral . At the end of a school safety roundtable event at the White House on Thursday   President Trump  was asked by a reporter if  he  thinks  his  proposal to âhardenâ schools with armed guards and armed teachers will put  him  at odds with the National Rifle Association  which spent $30 million to elect  him .
 The president  indicated  he  doesnât expect any problems.
âI donât think Iâll be going up against them  I really think the NRA wants to do whatâs right â  Trump  said. âI mean  theyâre very close to me  Iâm very close to them. Theyâre very very great people  they love this country â theyâre patriots. The NRA wants to do the right thing.â
It makes sense that  Trump  doesnât foresee conflict with the NRA  given that  he  was speaking at the end of an event where  he  parroted the pro-gun talking points used earlier in the day by NRA CEO Wayne LaPierre.
Consider some of the pro-gun buzzwords used by LaPierre during  his  speech earlier Thursday at CPAC. NPR put together an analysis looking at LaPierreâs comments in comparison with what  Trump  said hours later.
CNN put together a video of  Trump  parroting LaPierreâs lines.
The NRA has made clear that it opposes new regulations on semi-automatic firearms. During the White House event on Thursday   Trump  suggested that more guns are the solution to mass shootings.
While  Trump  clings to the NRAâs talking points and resists legislative gun control efforts  a number of major companies are taking the opposite approach.

A: yes
****
Q: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Bill Polian is Positive . Bill Polian   Hall of Fame executive.  His  status as a prognosticator is less solid. (NFL Network)
 Bill Polianâs  track record is undeniable. As general manager of the Buffalo Bills   he  cobbled together the lineups that advanced to four straight Super Bowls. With  Polian  at the personnel helm  the expansion Carolina Panthers advanced to the NFC championship game in just their second year of existence.  Polian  then concluded  his  career by shaping the Indianapolis Colts into a Super Bowl winner.
 He âs in  the Hall of Fame  and deserves to be  even if  his  post-football career as an ESPN analyst has been  shall we say  slightly less successful in the prediction department.
 Polian âs latest forecast involves Louisville quarterback Lamar Jackson  who  he  says is too short â at 6-foot-3 â and not accurate enough to be a successful NFL quarterback.
âI think wide receiver â  he  said  when asked about what NFL position Jackson should play Monday on ESPNâs âGolic and Wingo.â âExceptional athlete  exceptional ability to make you miss  exceptional acceleration  exceptional instinct with the ball in his hand  and that âs  rare for wide receivers. That âs  [Steelers wideout Antonio Brown] and who else  name me another one whoâs like that  right? Julio [Jones] is not like that. This guy is incredible in the open field and [has] a great ability to separate and  again  heâs short and a little bit slight and clearly  clearly not the thrower that the other guys are. His accuracy isnât there  so I would say  donât wait to make that change  donât be like the kid from Ohio State [Terrelle Pryor] and be 29 when you make the change.â
Anyway  it wouldnât be the first time  Polian  has been wrong.
 Polian  on Johnny Manziel
 Bill Polian : Johnny Manziel has magic. If you're in the Browns draft room  you owe it to the fans to consider taking him at 4. #SXMNFL â SiriusXM NFL Radio (@SiriusXMNFL) April 30  2014
 Polian  on Deshaun Watson
 Polian  on Robert Griffin III
 Polian  on Kirk Cousins and the Redskins

A: no
****
Q: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Stephen Paddock is Negative . Marilou Danley was in the Philippines visiting family when  Stephen Paddock  killed 58 people and injured another 557 in the Oct. 1 attack. She made changes to her Facebook account's privacy and personal settings at 12:30 a.m.  about 2 1/2 hours after the first volley of bullets rained down on people attending a music festival on the Las Vegas strip. The first calls about the shooting rolled in at 10:08 p.m.  according to police.
But it wasn't until nearly an hour after that â 3:30 a.m. â that police released  Paddock 's name to the public.
As the New York Post reports  the documents suggest Danley acted quickly after the shooting to conceal her relationship with  Paddock .
Danley  who also lived with  Paddock   has been adamant that she knew nothing about his plans to conduct the attack.
The documents lay out what investigators had learned about  Paddock  in the days following the shooting. But they do not provide a motive for what prompted the 64-year-old professional gambler to murder and terrorize concertgoers from 32nd floor of the Mandalay Bay hotel before killing himself.
One affidavit includes email exchanges between centralpark1@live.com  a Microsoft account that FBI authorities believe belonged to  Paddock   and centralpark4804@gmail.com. (It is unclear if the FBI knows who is responsible for the latter account.) The messages were sent on July 6  2017.
The exchanges took place nearly three months before the onslaught. And CNN reports that "investigators at the time of the filing had been unable to determine if  Paddock  was sending emails between two accounts both belonging to  himself   or was communicating with someone else."
In addition to the two email addresses  the FBI requested and was granted warrants to search  Paddock  and Danley's Facebook and Instagram accounts.  Paddock 's Amazon account is also under investigation  as well as a locked phone that was found in his room at the Mandalay Bay.
The FBI has said repeatedly that  Paddock  acted alone. Danley has not been charged with a crime. She has been questioned by investigators several times.

A:
no
****