We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

For example: Does anyone think that Bin Laden was innocent in the 9/11 World Trade Center bombings?
Invalid

We simply don't have the resources necessary to continue indefinitely housing those guilty of the most heinous crimes recognized by our judicial system.
Valid

The DPIC alleges that 12 of their 102 "innocents" were proven actually innocent because their DNA screenings were negative.

Valid