Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.

[Q]: The parroted false and inaccurate  mantra that hunters pay for conservation is propaganda steering the imbalance of wildlife management in Alaska and the U.S. 
Here is the revenue breakdown to illuminate truth:
In Alaska, non hunters contribute the lions share of 65% of the Wildlife Conservation funding.   Hunters contribute a minority 35% of this budget.  General funds, federal funds and Pittman Robertson funds are not derived by hunters alone.  No, they are the minority of all these funding sources.  Wildlife conservation is paid by all citizens equally...the majority of citizens do not hunt but they are Alaskan and US citizens paying the majority of the funding to the Wildlife Conservation Division budget.
[A]: Yes


[Q]: Sorry Joe Smith 543 but your only support comes from Homer's KareBear--ole' Kathleen Kearon is back.  Please tell me how to continue blocking her--many of us want to know!!
[A]: No


[Q]: You may wish to check the budget situation under St. Ronnie. 
It E X P L O D E D.
That's financial wizardry?
[A]:
No