instruction:
Given a document, an entity and its sentiment towards the entity, verify if it is the correct sentiment towards the entity. Answer should be yes or no. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].
question:
Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Pope Francis Letter is Negative . Well  it’s now happened.  The great scandal of the modern Catholic Church  —  its  tolerance for clergy who abuse children  and  its  laxity when dealing with bishops who themselves tolerated or enabled priest-abusers — now touches directly on  the pope himself .
 It ’s worth laying out the timeline clearly. In 2015  Pope Francis appointed Juan Barros Madrid to the bishopric of Osorno  Chile. The appointment was met with local protests  among Catholics and non-Catholics who believed that Barros was implicated in the crimes of child sexual abuse committed by his friend Father Fernando Karadima  a prominent Chilean churchman who habitually kissed and fondled boys. In the days after the installation of Barros at Osono  Pope Francis told an archbishop that there was “no objective reason at all” to oppose the appointment. The Vatican’s own department governing these matters  the Congregation for Bishops  released a statement saying they had “carefully examined the prelate’s candidature and did not find objective reasons to preclude the appointment.”
In the months following the appointment   Pope Francis  became extremely dismissive of complaints. “Osorno suffers  yes  for silliness ”  the pope  said of the outrage in the media. “Think with your head  and do not be carried away by the noses of the leftists  who are the ones who put this thing together ” he added.
A few weeks ago   Pope Francis ’s visit to Chile was marked by protests  and  the pope  continued  his  extremely brusque dismissal. “The day I see proof against Bishop Barros  then I will talk ” the pontiff said. “There is not a single piece of evidence against  him . It is all slander. Is that clear?”  Francis  said that no victims had come forward to  him . It was apparently this statement that caused Cardinal Sean O’Malley of Boston to scramble down to Chile and meet with the pope. After O’Malley’s intervention  presumably  the pope issued a half-apology  but repeated that the accusations against Barros were “slander” before adding  “I’m convinced he’s innocent.”
And now the news drops. In the time between the pope’s appointment of Barros and his commentary about protesters being carried away by leftists  members of the Vatican’s own Commission for the Protection of Minors gathered to discuss the appointment. They had a representative hand-deliver a letter to Pope Francis  from Carlos Cruz. The letter alleged  in lurid detail  that Barros had personally witnessed the abuse of Cruz at Karadima’s hands. Members of the commission photographed the hand-off of the letter to  the pope   to reassure Cruz that they were doing everything possible to make his cry for justice heard.
The facts as we know them leave us with a few interpretations. 1)  Pope Francis  simply never read the letter  ignoring this extraordinary intervention by the Vatican’s own commission on a matter of public controversy for  his  pontificate. 2)  Francis  read the letter but forgot about it  reverting to  his  original understanding of the case. 3)  Francis  read the letter  but stuck to  his  decision for Barros  committing unintentional or intentional deceptions about the state of  his  knowledge of the accusations. 4)  He  read the letter  but either doubted the accusations in it  or at least found them so unimpressive that  he  did not decide to follow up on them.
The first explanation would mean that  Francis  was culpably ignorant. The second that  he  may lack the mental or moral faculties to competently govern the Catholic Church. The third that  he  is too stubborn or vain to change course in the face of evidence. And the last that  he  has little trust or faith in the Commission on the Protection of Minors to pass on credible counsel to  him . Perhaps more reporting or disclosure will change our understanding  but none of these are satisfactory.
answer:
no


question:
Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Nicki Minaj Nicki is Positive . The Case
Nicki Minaj  posted an Instagram of  herself  in front of the distinctive blue-and-white Casper mattress box on Dec. 30 with this caption: âLove it @casper havenât slept in daze.â
Casper confirmed to BuzzFeed News in an email on Monday that it compensated  Nicki Minaj  to post about the mattress. It wasnât just a gift â  she  was paid $$$.
So shouldnât  she  have disclosed it was an ad in the caption? Casper said  âWe asked that  she  include the proper disclosure (#ad) in  her  caption. After  she  posted  we reached out â early last week â to ask that  she  update the copy to clarify.â
As of yesterday afternoon   Minaj  had still not updated  her  post to say that  it  was an ad.  Her  record label did not reply to BuzzFeed Newsâ request for comment.
answer:
no


question:
Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Saquon Barkley is Neutral . Penn State's Saquon Barkley  tries to run away from Indiana defenders. (Photo: Jeremy Long  Lebanon Daily News)
STATE COLLEGE  Pa. —  Saquon Barkley  demands your attention.  He  took the opening kickoff Saturday against Indiana 98 yards for a touchdown  skipping over a would-be tackler just steps from the end zone to add another moment to  his  Heisman Trophy highlight reel. No one catches  Barkley  from behind  especially Indiana.
“The game has evolved and the game has changed  and you have to take advantage of your playmakers in a variety of different ways ” said Penn State coach James Franklin. “ Saquon  makes it easy to do that.  He ’s just got so many tools in  his  tool box. Every week for us  it’s how do you take advantage of  him ?”
 Barkley  can be hard  if not impossible  to ignore. For the first time in more than a decade  this program can tout a true Heisman contender  one who stands among the best players in the nation regardless of position and seems capable of shouldering enough of a load to carry the Nittany Lions back to the top of the Big Ten Conference.
But Penn State had this  Barkley  a year ago —  he  might be a little faster  a little bigger and a little stronger  but  he  was roughly this good as a sophomore  if without the national fanfare and attention. And while very good  last year’s team had its flaws; the offensive line took a step forward yet remained a concern  continuing a trend  and the defense ranked in the bottom half of the conference.
RELATED: No. 4 Penn State blows out Indiana; more highlights for Saquon Barkley
Saquon Barkley's encore after last week's performance? A 98-yard TD return ON THE OPENING KICK: pic.twitter.com/OfpOTrZNA4 — Big Ten Network (@BigTenNetwork) September 30  2017
answer:

no