We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

I for one do not say that registration of all privately held firearms would violate the constitution.
Valid

The gun rights advocates I know are generally not like this, they support rights regardless if whther they agree with how they are being practiced or not.
Valid

Would you really want a public with an armed force of unknown size, strength, mobilty, location, organizational structure and intention anywhere in your country?

Valid