We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Q: Sent1: Once the danger is gone killing a person is simply murder.
 Sent2: This process is needed in order to ensure that innocent men and woman are not executed for crimes they did not commit, and even with these protections the risk of executing an innocent person can not be completely eliminated.

A: Not similar
****
Q: Sent1: so you weigh whatever monetary savings (if any) over the life of someone found innocent after conviction (even if rare)?
 Sent2: After all, the person you're torturing may actually be innocent.

A: Not similar
****
Q: Sent1: In any case, he didn't say that the penalty for sin is death, he said the penalty for one particular action which Adam couldn't even know was wrong, being unaware of good and evil, was death.
 Sent2: What he has done, if he really has done those actioons, is wrong, but that doesn't imo justify the death penalty.

A:
Not similar
****