In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

Example Input: Sentence: In the storm, the tree fell down and crashed through the roof of my  house. Now, I have to get it removed.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the tree because The trashed crashed through the roof: therefore the roof was broken and needed the repairs. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Example Output: Wrong

Example Input: Sentence: The table won't fit through the doorway because it is too wide.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the table because it is so large that the door is too narrow. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Example Output: Correct

Example Input: Sentence: Grace was happy to trade me her sweater for my jacket. She thinks it looks great on her.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the jacket because THE JACKET MORE LIKELY TO REFER THE SWEATER. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Example Output:
Wrong