Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.

Input: Consider Input: So what you are really saying is you have no evidence or argument.
I already stated i am not keen on him, but here i am giving you the opportunity to sway me, and you can provide no details to back up your statement before of "but when I look at their positions on the issues, Hillary comes out on top."  WHAT are those issues ? So far the only thing you have repeated is your statement of him being a racists. This does not bolster her skills or ability.  If you are supporting her, your job is to recruit votes for her, and to do that you need to present your case, not to lay blame on something else. you saying he suck does not make her better. i already know he sucks. State a reason she is better than him for the job ?  Because i can state multiple reasons, in spite of the fact that i disagree with him, that he is still better for the job than her.

Output: Yes


Input: Consider Input: "Roseland's strict no-moshing rule... "

PLEASE! It was non-stop moshing ALL NIGHT! And probably one of the most intense Fucking circle pit Portland has ever seen!

Output: Yes


Input: Consider Input: I think there are a number of us who would disagree with your implication that those under 21 are mature enough to "vote, enter into binding contracts, drive automobiles, enlist in the military and marry without anyone else's approval".


Output: No