In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.
--------
Question: Comment: 2 fucking charges of 1st degree and 1 for second degree for a chicken really popo woooow must be a slow day

Answer: Obscene


Question: Comment: Liberal ethical hypocrisy yet again... Being corrupt last time and on the edge of political oblivion obviously didn't teach them the lesson. Look at Wynne and now Morneau. Bitch and moan about unethical policies that Harper and his ilk the Conservatives practiced and now do EXACTLY the same thing. Liberals are worse than Conservatives because they lie about being ethical during the election to get the progressive vote and then ditch it once they are in power. Typical Liberal playbook. Trudeau is full of shit.

Answer: Obscene


Question: Comment: The University, for whatever, reason decided to terminate Mr. Walls' contract.  It was an amazingly "one-sided" document..ostensibly written for four years....but, with a "without cause" clause which allowed the University to terminate it with only one month's notice.  The administration exercised that legal right and terminated Mr. Walls with no stated "cause".....that was perfectly legal...however "unfair" it might seem.  On the other hand, perhaps they did have "cause" but chose to "take the easy way out" and not go through the hassle of proving any justification for his termination.  They experienced considerable "blowback" because of their actions and, it seems, decided to "buy off" Mr. Walls for $90K...."here that this damn money and go away!"  The whole fiasco reflects very badly on the administration...these guys make too much money to be so horribly incompetent...Gary Crum

Answer:
Obscene