We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

I think it could be proven that putting somebody in prison for life whent ehy have requested the death penalty is cruel and unusual punishment.
Valid

>_> Says the person who brought up freaking Nelson in a debate about the death penalty for murders.
Valid

The court time is not inevitable, otherwise there wouldn't be an argument as to the death penalty being more expensive than life imprisonment.

Valid