instruction:
We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.
question:
But the killing of innocent lives is a crime of almost every nation and by the way, this has gone to the point of needing another thread.
answer:
Valid


question:
what I am talking about is not a death penalty trial as we have today, but after the person has received a 100 year or more sentence.
answer:
Valid


question:
Oh, and by the way, the criteria that I mentioned earlier was enough to kill someone for treason, so why shouldn't it be enough to kill someone for another crime?
answer:

Valid