In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence can be inferred from the statement. Incorrect choices change the meaning in important ways or have details that are not mentioned in the statement. Indicate your answer as 1,2, or 3 corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.

Q: Statement: Since 1996 Legal Aid has increased its annual revenue by $6 million, renovated all of its offices and increased staff salaries Co which helps explain why 7 out of 13 chief (or managing) attorneys around the state are former Legal Aid lawyers who returned after stints in private or government practice. Choices:  1. Legal Aid raised its staff salaries and did some work on its offices. 2. Legal Aid workers got a ten percent raise on their salaries. 3. Legal Aid made some salary cuts for its staff, since 1996.

A: 1
****
Q: Statement: Although monitoring, in itself, may encourage compliance with information security policies, the full benefits of monitoring are not achieved unless results are used to improve the security program. Choices:  1. The results need to be used in order to improve the security program. 2. Information security policies were introduce last year and updated this year. 3. Compliance with information security policies is discouraged by monitoring.

A: 1
****
Q: Statement: And this plan of yours? Why had León come to him with it? Choices:  1. Why had León come to him with your plan? 2. This was never your plan to begin with. 3. Why had León approached him with your plan?

A:
1
****