TASK DEFINITION: In this task, you're given a statement, and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence clearly disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3' corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.
PROBLEM: Statement: You and Tuppence have been sticking together like Siamese twins. Choices:  1. There is no separating you and Tuppence anymore. 2. You and Tuppence have barely seen each other. 3. You and Tuppence have been hand in glove.

SOLUTION: 2

PROBLEM: Statement: It is sufficient to note, however, that Stevenson was content to rely on a mix of his own admitted bloodthirstiness and good old-fashioned prejudice for his conclusion. Choices:  1. Stevenson relied on his thirst for blood and prejudice.  2. Stevenson was just and relied on the truth. 3. Stevenson will do anything to get ahead. 

SOLUTION: 2

PROBLEM: Statement: From the hall, a colonnade leads to an immense hypostyle (with columns supporting the roof) hall, decorated with double rows of papyrus columns with beautifully preserved colors, and on to the Court of Amenophis III. Choices:  1. There are double rows of Papyrus columns to provide greater structural support. 2. All the colors have faded from the papyrus columns. 3. The colors of the papyrus columns are well preserved.

SOLUTION:
2