Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.

Ex Input:
"Conscious outdoor growers have proved that careful curing periods in glass jars and occasional bursts of clean air can maintain potency better than indoor buds."     Nonsense, curing in glass jars is best? Do you have any study that shows or proves this? In what way was it better? What is the difference between glass cured and cured in a big cardboard box for several months? I have done both and glass sucks, you need to check for microbiological pathogens after a glass cure, you will find them.                    "When you drink different types of wine or beer, the end result is essentially the same: You get drunk. Tequila may have a more dynamic effect than Coors Light, but the variance doesn't compare to the diverse cultivars of cannabis."      A better comparison would be a White Vs Red wine, many people complain that Red's make the more sleepy vs a white wine, more like a NLD variety vs a WLD variety.

Ex Output:
No


Ex Input:
Hercules: If one follows your logic, he or she should "star" each and every comment.  Everyone's imput is valuable.  Starring a comment, as I've seen it applied on this site, does, in fact, represent agreement with that comment.  BTW: I see you failed to "star" my comment. Does that mean you feel my imput on the issue of smoking in County Parks is not valuable?  Up to this point in time Mr. Bozievich hasn't "starred" my comment.  Does that mean he feels Outsider's imput is valuable, but mine isn't?  Gosh, now my feelings are hurt.....

Ex Output:
Yes


Ex Input:
I recall that active FBI agents were considering applying to APD.

Ex Output:

No