In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine the neutral choice based on your inference from the statement and your commonsense knowledge. The neutral choice is a sentence that neither agrees nor disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3', corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence. If sentence X agrees with sentence Y, one's correctness follows from the other one. If sentence X disagrees with sentence Y, they can not be correct at the same time.

Input: Consider Input: Statement: Accordingly, sections 203 and 204 of the act, which require agencies to consult with small governments and solicit input from State, local, and tribal governments, are also inapplicable. Choices: 1. Sections two hundred three and two hundred four are inapplicable. 2. Sections five hundred and five hundred one are inapplicable, sections 203 and 204 are fine though. 3. The sections of the act required extensive changes.

Output: 3


Input: Consider Input: Statement: 'Wouldn't that be extremely dangerous?' Choices: 1. I was concerned about the dangers involved.  2. That seems to be the safest route.  3. Would that not be hazardous?

Output: 1


Input: Consider Input: Statement: And frankly, we do not pursue state planning because we want our naysayers to believe that LSC has reformed itself. Choices: 1. We plan on pursuing state planning. 2. We do not pursue state planning because we want our naysayers to believe that LSC has reformed itself. 3. People doubt that LSC has reformed itself.


Output: 3