instruction:
In this task, you're given a statement, and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence clearly disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3' corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.
question:
Statement: Participants also noted that the PCAOB should take advantage of the fact that under the current environment no one has more motivation for getting bad auditors off the street than the accounting firms themselves. Choices:  1. Bad auditors are identified by cameras in the office lunch room. 2. Accounting firms are motivated to remove bad auditors. 3. The PCAOB should not be concerned with bad auditors at accounting firms.
answer:
3


question:
Statement: That couldn't be good. Choices:  1. It was bad. 2. It would be a good thing. 3. This had happened before.
answer:
2


question:
Statement: The Clinger-Cohen Act of 1996 repeated this theme and provided more detailed requirements. Choices:  1. The Clinger-Cohen Act was repealed in 1996. 2. The Clinger-Cohen Act was written in May of 1996. 3. The Clinger-Cohen Act was written in 1996.
answer:

1