We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Ex Input:
Sent1: There's no evidence to prove the believe that when guns are less available, less criminals will be armed than if guns were more readily available.
 Sent2: I have a better theory as to why there's a supposed smaller availability of guns to criminals in the UK; because there are less people and obviously fewer guns were ever made or imported to begin with.

Ex Output:
Not similar


Ex Input:
Sent1: And that assumes that gun control will have no effect on illegal firearm ownership.
 Sent2: To inact a law that makes a crime of illegal gun ownership has no effect on criminal ownership of guns.

Ex Output:
Similar


Ex Input:
Sent1: You can not use this as evidence that the reduction in crime is due to the gun ban.
 Sent2: Doesn't hold together, though - you have no evidence that criminal arms supply is unaffected by gun control.

Ex Output:

Not similar