In this task, you're given reviews from Amazon's food products and a summary of that review. Your task is to classify whether the given summary matches the original review. Generate "True" if the given review and its summary match, otherwise generate "False".

[Q]: Reviews: I purchased this particular handheld model to replace an older one purchased about a year and a half ago. Both my wife and I felt extremely optimistic given the high reviews. However, we are now promptly returning it and will buy from a different brand. First, the crevice tool was never included in the box. If the vacuum actually worked as described, this would not have been a huge issue. As you can probably already infer, the vacuum's functionality (in addition to the missing part) WAS a disappointment. After using it twice (both times fully charged), we realized that our old, much cheaper handheld still worked better. With the brush or extension tube attachment connected, it seemed essentially worthless with regard to suction. Further, even without an attachment, the vacuum literally had no true suction power. It struggled to pick up even the smallest and lightest weight particles on the floor, stairs, counter, etc. Again, given the positive reviews, we were very hopeful that it would be a great replacement. Unfortunately, it's boxed up and will be dropped off at UPS tomorrow. 
 Summary: the vacuum's functionality (in addition to the missing part) WAS a disappointment. After using it twice (both times fully charge
[A]: True


[Q]: Reviews: Love this product but save your money! The bottle came only have filled 😡 not worth the money 
 Summary: Fan Broke After Two Months (didn't even use it every day)!
[A]: False


[Q]: Reviews: Lamp is poorly made. Hinge to adjust upper arm WILL NOT hold. I have the desktop size of this lamp and material size and sturdiness appear to have changed-are thinner and less robust. But the Adjustment issue is just ridiculous. 
 Summary: Lamp is poorly made. Hinge to adjust upper arm ...
[A]:
True