We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Q: Sent1: if it's murder then okay... the criminal deserves the death penalty.
 Sent2: You might say the criminal deserved it, but murder is murder, whether they deserved it or not.

A: Not similar
****
Q: Sent1: Well one thing for sure the muderer or rapist who is executed will never commit those crimes again........He is permanently deterred........
 Sent2: Also, I wonder if a criminal thinks of the punishment when he commits the crime - if he were counting on being punished, he wouldn't have done it.

A: Not similar
****
Q: Sent1: You are against of violence, but have you ever thought that death penalty is also violence?
 Sent2: My final point is, whether you believe in the afterlife or whether you think once we're dead this is it, do you not think death is the least punishing form of punishment?

A:
Not similar
****