We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

[Q]: Today in Australia, the NSW government released a report stating that not enough is being done about rehabilitating prisoners, hence the jail population has increased dramatically.
[A]: Valid


[Q]: First, i'm curious to know why you call having sex "indulging", as I really don't see how sex has to do with "indulging".
[A]: Invalid


[Q]: So I argue that 3000 years of use does provide evidence that capital punishment works.
[A]:
Valid