We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Example Input: Sent1: And especially why would one do that if it means death penalty would become possible?
 Sent2: The death penalty provides a possible (but by no means apparent) benefit on crime rates compared to imprisonment, but a very definite loss on human happiness.
Example Output: Not similar

Example Input: Sent1: The point is that people who care about you will suffer more if you die than if you are tortured or raped.
 Sent2: This was one of his most important messages, yet now we learn that you are wishing death upon these people, not just the extreme suffering that you previously wished upon them.
Example Output: Not similar

Example Input: Sent1: Some prisons are actually prisons instead of criminal resorts, and those are the best to put scum like them in.
 Sent2: If someone is wrongly convicted of a crime and put in jail, they can be released if they're found to be innocent.
Example Output:
Not similar