TASK DEFINITION: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
PROBLEM: You do understand that you can't prove a negative right? People of faith are the ones making wild ass claims about magic sky wizards with no supporting evidence it is incumbent on them to provide proof of their claims not the other way around.

SOLUTION: No

PROBLEM: A man in custody had his spine "functionally" severed. He was probably "jacked" in transit. Some person(s) did something really wrong. A lawyer for Nero, Marc Zayon, said that the apprehension of Gray was legal, and that, even if it wasn't: "Wrong or right isn't the standard. The standard is, were they so wrong that it was unreasonable?" Zayon said. This likely manslaughter case has been broken into separate legal actions and will die like the suspect.

SOLUTION: No

PROBLEM: We do not want or need this addictive intoxicant pulling more of our youth into dire straights! Shut down these drug dealers.

SOLUTION:
Yes