In this task, you will be shown a sentence, and you should determine whether it is overruling or non-overruling. In law, an overruling sentence is a statement that nullifies a previous case decision as a precedent by a constitutionally valid statute or a decision by the same or higher ranking court which establishes a different rule on the point of law involved. Classify your answers into overruling or non-overruling
--------
Question: instead, a plaintiff must ""provide enough detail to show the factual basis for its claim.""

Answer: non-overruling


Question: in its opinion in sanchez-gomez, the supreme court rejected the concept that the previously shackled defendants had shown a sufficient stake in the outcome to avoid mootness because they ""sought relief from the restraint policy not merely for themselves, but for all in-custody defendants in the district.""

Answer: non-overruling


Question: we flatly rejected this logic a century ago in state ex rel. state capitol commission v. lister, 91 wash. 9, 156 p. 858 (1916), and we reject it again now.

Answer:
overruling