In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

Example Input: Comment: Gay people are a minority in our society and, therefore wield little power. They are susceptible to the whims of the majority.
Example Output: Identity-attack

Example Input: Comment: Is there any specific reason you have to be so condescending? You seem to have a serious judgement problem to make a statement like I haven't read the article. If I didn't I wouldn't have known of your biased almost racist rant.  And you stated you "have seen people who have written.."  Really you saw them actually writing the comments?  Amazing or untrue.  You read what they wrote, you didn't see them writing. You seem confused.  Bad journalism.  As far a Sessions comment, you had your own explanation and I disagreed with you.  I guess no one can disagree with you because you are a journalist.  You write articles  and responses however you please, but if someone disagrees with your elitist condescending posts you get them ruled uncivil.  You have to hide behind CB I guess because of your feelings of inadequacy.  In your mind the posts are all wrong and you are right.  Most seem to agree with me.  Ever ask yourself why you feel you have to vehemently defend yourself all the time?
Example Output: Non-identity-attack

Example Input: Comment: It means treating women like mangy dogs and throwing homosexuals off rooftops.
Example Output:
Identity-attack