Categorize the comment on the basis of obscenity. If the comment is obscene output Yes, otherwise output No.

Mea culpa on the comment relating to a move from an area near the tracks to the South Hills.  It was an unnecessary little anti-elitist "dig" and I apologize.  I do realize a lot of the folks in the South Hills have had their homes for decades and bought them for a mere fraction of what they're worth now.  Of course all that increased value does is impact your property taxes (up to the time of Measure 5).  Our little farm is worth about 20 times what we paid for it in 1971.  That's a "so what" unless we're willing to "sell out the farm."  Like those many folks in the South Hills, we're not ready to do that.  

regards, Gary
No

Josh,

You must be joshing! And then there's that word "deserve" again. By what logic or evidence does every worker "deserve" a $15.00 per hour wage? Some workers "deserve" to be fired because they lack the traits necessary to keep their jobs and fulfill their part of the labor/owner/management contract. Until these sorts can resolve their problems that lead to their chronic unemployment, they "deserve" nothing beyond perhaps a hand up in becoming functional employees.
No

Craig Medred needs to find an honest job instead of impassioning people state wide against this individual.  This kind of garbage does nothing to help prevent domestic violence it only helps perpetuate it.  Pushing offenders into the dark, slaughtering their name state wide, gives them no incentive to seek help.  It only further hurts and enrages.

Yes