In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence can be inferred from the statement. Incorrect choices change the meaning in important ways or have details that are not mentioned in the statement. Indicate your answer as 1,2, or 3 corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.

[Q]: Statement: Impeachment, once taboo, now seems like a legitimate weapon, a way to settle the score. Choices:  1. Impeachment seems like a good way to get back at them. 2. Impeachment is never a good idea. 3. Impeachment can be a good way to make things even, depending when it's done.
[A]: 1


[Q]: Statement: well not that we could be bought but uh Choices:  1. You could easily buy us, no doubt.  2. Well, we can't necessarily really be bought, but... 3. I would rather not sell myself out, or us as a whole, but if you can think of something tempting, maybe we can come to a deal.
[A]: 2


[Q]: Statement: (If Bush were a movie, he'd be the new Star Wars : the closely guarded, breathlessly anticipated next episode in a multigenerational saga of family destiny. Choices:  1. If Bush were a movie, it would be Titanic because he's long winded and sad.  2. Bush would be a new Star Wars movie because his term would be highly anticipated.  3. If people were movies, Bush would be Star Wars because how how closely guarded and anticipated his family is.
[A]:
3