In this task, you will be shown a sentence, and you should determine whether it is overruling or non-overruling. In law, an overruling sentence is a statement that nullifies a previous case decision as a precedent by a constitutionally valid statute or a decision by the same or higher ranking court which establishes a different rule on the point of law involved. Classify your answers into overruling or non-overruling

Ex Input:
because, as a result, we overrule people v. caudillo (1978) 21 cal.3d 562 ( caudillo), we do not apply the holding retroactively to defendant.

Ex Output:
overruling


Ex Input:
we disapprove of people v. aris, supra, 215 cal.app.3d 1178, and people v. day, supra, 2 cal.app.4th 405, to the extent they are inconsistent with this conclusion.

Ex Output:
overruling


Ex Input:
to the extent that ozuna can be read to hold that the bexar county notice of dismissal apprises parties of the court's intent to dismiss on a ground other than the failure to appear under rule 165a(1), or that knight v. trent, 739 s.w.2d 116 (tex.app.  san antonio 1987, no writ), gaebler v. harris, 625 s.w.2d 5 (tex.app.-san antonio 1981, writ ref'd n.r.e.), and laird v. jones, 580 s.w.2d 413 (tex.app.-san antonio 1979, no writ), imply that a party may be charged with such notice, we disapprove of the language of those cases.

Ex Output:

overruling