In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Ex Input:
Comment: I hope Mr. Valu gets a light sentence. "Laws" be damned, that's a good father. Respect, sir.

Ex Output:
Obscene


Ex Input:
Comment: I've had a few ex military friends say they would join the men wearing flannel before they ever shot killed American citizens. Remember this term: "all threats, foreign and DOMESTIC" ever consider our own president as a threat? OH CRAP....I think the cigarette smoking man from The X-Files is sitting in a car outside my apartment I better shut up.

Ex Output:
Obscene


Ex Input:
Comment: Hlabirwa, if you read the submitted documents and the arguments you will actually come to realise that Solidarity and AfriForum wants more potential black athletes to rise to the top. The thing is it should be accomplished by recognising talent early and developing them. To enforce a racially biased system from the top-down however, without developing from grassroots level is not sustainable nor effective. More should be done to develop young sport stars and thats where our failing economy, government and dysfunctional schooling system is failing our children

Ex Output:

Non-obscene