TASK DEFINITION: In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence can be inferred from the statement. Incorrect choices change the meaning in important ways or have details that are not mentioned in the statement. Indicate your answer as 1,2, or 3 corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.
PROBLEM: Statement: A good case study reports methodological strengths and limitations for answering the evaluation questions and explains the tradeoffs that were considered and who influenced the decisions. Choices:  1. Limitations of the methodology used should not be discussed in the case study report. 2. Decision influencers can have a negative impact on the study's credibility. 3. Tradeoffs can be made during a case study, and should be disclosed.

SOLUTION: 3

PROBLEM: Statement: This was 1971, not 1917! Choices:  1. This was the year 1971, not the year 1917. 2. This was 1971, but people were acting like it was 1917. 3. This was 1917, and 1971 wouldn't come around for another fifty years.

SOLUTION: 1

PROBLEM: Statement: Wilson also observes that besides the Unabomber's manifesto, his skill in manufacturing bombs and the clever ways in which he concealed his identity suggest to me that he was clearly sane. Choices:  1. There is a lot of evidence to show that he was clearly sane. 2. He often made bombs and went out of his way to hide his identity so he wouldn't be recognized by the local press. 3. He didn't do a good job of hiding his identity.

SOLUTION:
1