Given a document, an entity and its sentiment towards the entity, verify if it is the correct sentiment towards the entity. Answer should be yes or no. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

Q: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Mark Sargent is Negative . Mark Sargent  a software analyst from Boulder now living in Seattle   is the primary organizer of the movement and has made more than a thousand videos.  He  believes Colorado’s open-mindedness accounts for its prominent position among believers.
Back in 2015  when  he  typed “flat Earth” into YouTube  he ’d get 50 000 hits. Now it’s more than 18.7 million  beating out Lady Gaga and closing in on Donald Trump at about 21.3 million.  Sargent  said  he  suspects millions of believers remain “in the closet” to avoid ridicule.
“My channel broke 10 million views in December ”  he  said. “This is my full-time job now.”
Sargent  49  became a believer after watching videos and realizing  he  could “no longer prove the globe.”
The flat Earth revival   he  said  can be explained in large part by YouTube  increased skepticism of authority and the message of hope it conveys.
“Science doesn’t even get their arguments out there ”  Sargent  said. “They try to beat us with math but people don’t understand it. It might as well be static  so they listen to  me .”

A: no
****
Q: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Ramis Ruiz is Positive . Plaintiffs Ramis Ruiz  21  and John Messing  41  accused their fellow volunteer EMTs at the Bay Shore-Brightwaters Rescue Ambulance of sexual harassment  bullying and discrimination.
According to the suit   Ruiz  was slandered during a election for the service’s assistant chief position by charges that she was “sleeping around with (fellow) members” to win votes for her candidate.
 Ruiz  complained about sexual harassment and bullying  but gripes fell on deaf ears.
Messing claimed he was suspended after backing  Ruiz  in her gripes about harassment  and eventually fired from the department.

A: yes
****
Q: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Charles Rangel is Positive . The vote makes Rangel just the 23rd member of the House to be censured  and the first in nearly three decades.
 Rangel and his allies had pleaded for mercy  arguing his transgressions  which included failure to pay income taxes and misuse of his office to solicit fundraising donations  deserved the more lenient punishment of a reprimand. But that effort failed  267-146.
 Still  talking to reporters after leaving the House floor  Rangel's old pugnacity returned as he denounced the vote as partisan.
 "I am confident that when the history of this has been written  people will recognize that the vote for censure was a very  very  very political vote " Rangel said.
 Rep. Zoe Lofgren  D-Calif.  the chairwoman of the ethics committee  said in the past  censure had been used for members who had used unparliamentary language and that Rangel had promised voters that Democrats would run the most ethical Congress in history.
 "We need to hold ourselves to a higher standard " Lofgren said. "Mr. Rangel himself has acknowledged that."
 Rangel's long battle over the ethics charges has transfixed New York City's political establishment  and set off speculation about how long he will remain in office. Several Democrats are eyeing the seat  but no major figure dared to challenge Rangel last fall  when he easily won re-election.
Rangel's long battle over the ethics charges has transfixed New York City's political establishment  and set off speculation about how long he will remain in office. Several Democrats are eyeing the seat  but no major figure dared to challenge Rangel last fall  when he easily won re-election.

A:
yes
****