Given a document and an entity the task is to select the author's sentiment towards the entity. Sentiments can be Positive, Neutral and Negative. Select Positive if the article expresses a positive view towards the given entity or praises its quality or skills. Select Neutral if the document expresses no clear view towards the entity or has equal amounts of positive and negative statements or expressing some fact/quote by someone else. Select Negative if the article expresses a negative view towards like harsh remarks, criticizing entities action/decision etc. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

[Q]: What is the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Elizabeth Warren ? Senator Elizabeth Warren (Yuri Gripas/Reuters)
Donald Trumpâs taunts may turn out to be the least of  Elizabeth Warrenâs  problems if  her  refusal to apologize for  her  false claims of native American heritage angers the Left.
Since the issue was first raised during  her  2012 Senate election campaign   Senator Elizabeth Warren  has acted as if questions about  her  past claims of Native American ancestry were simply racist.  Her  assumption was that the more President Donald Trump called  her  âPocahontas â the better it was for  her   since his insults are a badge of honor on the left. But as  she  prepares for what looks like a run at the 2020 Democratic presidential nomination  it turns out the man in the White House is not the only one who thinks thereâs something fishy about  Warren âs attempt to brush off criticism of  her  fibs.
The fact that  Warren  has been involving  herself  in Native American issues and spoke to the National Congress of American Indians (NCAI) earlier this month is a tipoff that  she  is thinking about more than what will be a cakewalk to reelection in Massachusetts this fall. The Native American controversy is a potential liability  and not just because Republicans will never let  her  forget about it. In what is likely to be a brutally competitive 2020 Democratic race with a large field of candidates  for the first time   she  can expect some fellow Democrats to chime in about  her  past claims.
That ought to provide plenty of motivation for  Warren  to dispose of the issue  by apologizing for what  she  can call a misunderstanding based on what turned out to be a family myth. Simply saying youâre sorry and leaving it at that goes a long way toward silencing critics in any crisis. But it appears that  Warren  isnât choosing that path. Instead of putting the controversy to rest   Warren  has chosen to embrace it.
If it was only Trump calling  her  âFauxcahontas â  Warren  would probably have let the issue rest and relied on the willingness of the media and other liberals to label the president and anyone else lobbing the epithet at  her  as racists. But once  Warren  heard The Daily Showâs Trevor Noah mock  her  false claims of Cherokee ancestry   she  likely realized that Republicans werenât the only ones ready to finally hold  her  accountable for  her  decades-long pose as a minority. A similarly critical piece about the issue by a Cherokee activist  published on the left-wing ThinkProgress website  also made it clear that the cover  she âs received from fellow liberals on this point is vanishing. More important   she âll likely be facing off against actual minority candidates  such as Kamala Harris and Cory Booker  in 2020  at which point the authenticity of  her  background will again become an issue.
 Her  solution was to give a series of interviews and speeches in which  she  admits that  her  past assertions cannot be backed up by the record  but continues to insist that  she  did no wrong  asserting that the notion of  her  Cherokee identity is a long-cherished part of  her  family lore that was handed down to  her . When  she  told the Boston Globe  âI know who I am â it came across as defiant.
The falseness of Warrenâs claims about  her  heritage seems clear by now. Though  Warren  keeps saying that  she  was told  her  motherâs family was part Cherokee and Delaware  there is no proof that this is true. Both genealogists and historians have examined the birth  marriage  and death records of  her  family and found no trace of either tribe. The tribal rolls also show no one in  her  family as having been a registered Cherokee or Delaware. Thatâs a point on which Native American activists have been assertive with respect to other whites seeking to gain either a fake minority status or access to some of the privileges or income available to tribal members in an era when casinos have become a lifeline for their communities.
While  Warren âs puzzling choice to try and have it both ways can be attributed to poor judgment  it also demonstrates the fatal appeal of identity politics on the left.
Faced with these inconvenient facts   Warren  appears to think a strategy in which  she  can be anointed as a sort of honorary Native American might serve to undermine any criticism. In  her  speech to the NCAI   Warren  admitted that  âYou wonât find my family members on any rolls  and Iâm not enrolled in a tribe. And I want to make something clear: I respect that distinction  I understand that tribal membership is determined by tribes  and only by tribes.â
Yet rather than leave it at that   Warren  didnât apologize for past claims of identity and then asserted that  she  had never used those claims to get ahead in  her  career  even though that is disputed.  She  also went on to say that whenever  she  is attacked for  her  past fibs in the future   she  would âuse it to lift up the story of your families and communities.â And indeed   she  has lately signed up to co-sponsor some bills of interest to Native Americans that were promulgated by other senators.
But at the same time   she  hasnât apologized for listing  herself  as a Native American during the course of  her  career as a law professor  which may have given  her  a leg up in the fierce competition for coveted spots on the Harvard Law School faculty. Nor has  she  stopped sticking to  her  unsubstantiated story about  her  fatherâs family opposing  her  parentsâ marriage because of  her  motherâs tribal ties;  she  even retold it during  her  speech to the NCAI.
While  Warren âs puzzling choice to try and have it both ways can be attributed to poor judgment  it also demonstrates the fatal appeal of identity politics on the left. In a political culture that prizes any link to victimization   Warren  still canât resist holding onto  her  past claims  even though a simple apology would seem the smarter move.
 Warren âs supporters point to the fact that Scott Brown   her  2012 Senate opponent  didnât seem to profit from his campaignâs emphasis on the âfake Indianâ issue. But once  she âs competing for liberal votes in Democratic primaries  rather than counting  as  she  did then  on  her  party uniting behind  her  no matter what the opposition says  it will be a very different story.  She âll likely discover that the game  she âs playing is a lot more dangerous on the national stage than it was in Massachusetts.
[A]: Neutral


[Q]: What is the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Graig Kreindler ? Banjo   Batboy Eddie Bennett (2010) ( Graig Kreindler)
Graig Kreindler  sweats  the details   as a researcher no less than as an artist.
‘I believe the lights were on ” wrote Bobby Thomson to Graig Kreindler  who was researching the Shot Heard Round the World  the storied walk-off home run that sent the New York Giants to the World Series five decades earlier.  Kreindler  knew that the sun was low in the sky behind first base and dimmed by dark clouds when Thomson came to bat a few minutes before 4 p.m. on October 3  1951  at the Polo Grounds in Upper Manhattan.
Was it hard to see the ball? Or did the Giants turn the lights on  if only for the primitive TV cameras  there to capture the deciding game of the first baseball series ever broadcast live to a national audience? From the grainy black-and-white film and photos   Kreindler  couldn’t tell  and newspaper accounts were silent on the question. So he asked Thomson  half-expecting either no response or an autographed souvenir from a retired player trained by experience to assume that a personal letter from a stranger must be fan mail.
Even if Thomson hadn’t hedged his answer   Kreindler  would have counted it for what it was: a datum  good to have but not dispositive. He reasoned that the slugger was “in a tight situation”: the tying run on second  the National League pennant on the line  half a city’s hopes pinned on his shoulders. “Does he even notice the lights? I mean  why would he?” After weighing the probabilities  Kreindler  an artist who paints old-time baseball  went ahead and made the banks of rooftop lights glaring  adjusting the shades and shadows on the canvas accordingly.
Ballparks are treated to the same loving scrutiny. Did Bobby Doerr by any chance remember the colors of an ad  for Gem razor blades  on the left-field wall at Fenway Park in 1939  his third of 14 seasons with the Boston Red Sox? He did not  he regretted to report  on the back of a three-by-five-inch index card 70 years later  when he was in his 90s.  Kreindler  realizes that the strangers from whom he seeks information about light or color at the ballpark during a particular hour or season in baseball antiquity are liable to find his questions bizarre. Do they think he’s nuts? A few might; not all reply. He asks anyway.
Peter Fiore  his former teacher and enduring mentor and friend  was taught by an artist who was taught by . . .  Kreindler  traces  his  professional lineage back to the father of American illustration  Howard Pyle (1853–1911). The seriousness of  Kreindler ’s artistry is easy to miss because of  his  subject matter and manifest love for it. Prize committees may have a bias for the brazen or edgy  but to convey warmth and uplift the viewer is no less an achievement  a marriage of vision and discipline.
“Art critics might scoff at what we do and consider it kitschy ”  Kreindler  acknowledges  referring to the small fraternity of baseball artists  several of whom  he  touts and cites as helpful influences  including “obviously Norman Rockwell ” although you won’t always find a conspicuous resemblance between their work and  his . “I like to think I bring something different to this ”  he  says. “I don’t expect my work ever to hang in major museums  but it could  in theory.”
Forty years after his death  Rockwell  mocked and dismissed by the cognoscenti in his lifetime  is revered as an American master by connoisseurs and critics in and out of the academy. The Guggenheim and the Museum of Fine Arts  Boston  have exhibited his work. If the tastemakers ever likewise catch up with  Kreindler   the baseball historians and fans who got there first will rise from their catbird seats behind home plate and make room for them  under the lights.
[A]: Positive


[Q]: What is the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Deandre Ayton ? Arizona freshman Deandre Ayton has been named player and newcomer of the year on the All-Pac-12 Conference men's basketball team announced Tuesday by The Associated Press. Utah coach Larry Krystkowiak was named coach of the year.
 Ayton  was one of the nation's top incoming recruits when  he  arrived in Tucson and lived up to expectations during a stellar freshman season with the 15th-ranked Wildcats.
" He 's a once in a generation player " Arizona coach Sean Miller said. "I doubt if I'll coach anyone like  him  again."
The 7-foot-1  260-pound big man from the Bahamas became the first Pac-12 freshman in 25 years to average at least 19 points and 11 rebounds  finishing with 19.9 points and 11.4 rebounds during the regular season.  Ayton  is the second freshman to lead the conference in rebounding  joining California's Leon Power in 2004.
 Ayton  shot 61 percent from the floor and was a force on the defensive end as well  finishing with 59 blocked shots to tie for seventh-most in conference history by a freshman.
Behind Ayton and first-team all-Pac-12 guard Allonzo Trier  Arizona overcame a season of turmoil to win its fifth Pac-12 title in six years.  Ayton  is projected to be a top-five pick in this year's NBA draft.
 Arizona forward Deandre Ayton (13)  drives against California forward Marcus Lee during the second half of an NCAA college basketball game Saturday  March 3  2018  in Tucson   Ariz. Arizona  defeated California 66-54. (AP Photo/Rick Scuteri)
u-Deandre Ayton   Arizona   F  7-1  260  Fr  Nassau  Bahamas
Arizona forward Deandre Ayton shoots over California center Kingsley Okoroh (22) during the second half of an NCAA college basketball game  Saturday  March 3  2018  in Tucson  Ariz. Arizona defeated California 66-54. (AP Photo/Rick Scuteri)
[A]:
Neutral