In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

[Q]: Comment: The press is bias even when TV  cameras are pointed directly at Trump and he's mouthing his civil war message?  Assassinate Hillary message?  All women are liars because he can't keep women's mouths shut after groping them and getting caught on audio/video bragging about it?  So, tell us again how the media is bias.
[A]: Non-obscene


[Q]: Comment: The authors of the  JJ report insist that homosexuality played no role in the abuse crisis, but their own data undermine this conclusion. For example, they plainly admit that “81% of the victims [between 1950 and 2002] were male,” and that 78% were post-pubescent.

So if the abusers weren’t pedophiles, and the victims were mostly adolescent males, wouldn’t that make the victimizers homosexuals?

What else could we possibly be talking about if not homosexuality?

Why can't you answer this question?
[A]: Non-obscene


[Q]: Comment: He was a damned good cook. I wish I had told him.
[A]:
Obscene