In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.
--------
Question: Comment: Jill: Just another note.....the rather infamous incident you reference involved a "he said, she said" sexual assault?/consensual sex? incident involving a young lady and three (now ex-) basketball players.  We could spend hours debating the incident.  However, in all fairness, you should refer to "allegedly GANG RAPED".  I spoke out at the time, and will repeat, the Administation's actions were deplorable and violated every standard for patient/therapist confidentiality.  I very much agree that the U of O has a very self-serving "flexible" standard of privacy.  It's cost them a great deal of money in the past and will cost them a great deal more unless they develop and honor a decent standard of privacy.  regards, Gary Crum

Answer: Sexual-explicit


Question: Comment: Justin Tanoue: I'm laughing my mother f***ing A$$ off!!!!

Thank YOU for providing my morning coffee-through-the-nose moment!!!!

Answer: Sexual-explicit


Question: Comment: There is no country in the world that is primarily Islamic that has gay rights. Yet, ETFO continues to uphold that Islamic prayers should be held in public schools in Ontario and that Islamophobia is the problem. Sorry, ETFO, you're on the wrong side of history supporting this cause!

BTW, ETFO wants to remove the names of dead prime ministers from schools, but ETFO doesn't mind having its members oversee sexist, anti-gay, and anti-anything-but-Muslim prayers in their schools - in a language most members don't even understand, so they can't even be monitored????

Answer:
Non-sexual-explicit