In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

Example Input: Sentence: Thomson visited Cooper's grave in 1765. At that date he had been dead for five years.
 Reason: The 'he' refers to cooper because He visited Cooper's grave in 176. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Example Output: Wrong

Example Input: Sentence: Paul tried to call George on the phone, but he wasn't available.
 Reason: The 'he' refers to george because George was likely the one not reachable. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Example Output: Correct

Example Input: Sentence: Alice tried frantically to stop her daughter from barking at the party, leaving us to wonder why she was behaving so strangely.
 Reason: The 'she' refers to alice's daughter because she is a girl and it is implied that she and Alice have a daughter named Alice. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Example Output:
Wrong