instruction:
In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.
question:
Comment: Trump is a rotten piece of shit
answer:
Obscene


question:
Comment: And, finally:
.
"We'd be in uncharted territory, that is unarguable."
.
What nonsense.
.
The vast majority of democracies world-wide use PR.  Are you really suggesting Canadians are too dumb to figure it out?
.
Or are you merely suggesting that it only works in countries where the populations once worshipped Odin, Thor, and Freya?
.
Bring on Bugs Bunny, Elmer Fudd, and the Wagnerian opera ...
answer:
Non-obscene


question:
Comment: If someone doesn't care for an opinion nor the manner in which it's posed, the reaction is no better nor worse, and the wise resist expressing it. If someone chooses to be insulted by a letter deemed unworthy of consideration, that logically shouldn't matter, either. If memory serves, that's the Zen-like counsel a young relative provided you one day. Apparently, the struggle to practice it continues.
What does matter is that opinions, even the prickly, find the light of day with as little resistance as possible. If wishing to have access to any and all viewpoints regardless of their content is, indeed, silly, so be it.
answer:

Non-obscene