Given a document and an entity the task is to select the author's sentiment towards the entity. Sentiments can be Positive, Neutral and Negative. Select Positive if the article expresses a positive view towards the given entity or praises its quality or skills. Select Neutral if the document expresses no clear view towards the entity or has equal amounts of positive and negative statements or expressing some fact/quote by someone else. Select Negative if the article expresses a negative view towards like harsh remarks, criticizing entities action/decision etc. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

Input: Consider Input: What is the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Antonin Scalia ? With “Scalia Speaks: Reflections on Law  Faith  and Life Well Lived ” Christopher J. Scalia and Edward Whelan have given us a treasure that captures Justice Antonin Scalia’s brilliance  wit  faith  humility and wide range of knowledge. When I read this collection of his speeches  edited by the justice’s son and one of his law clerks  I feel like  Scalia  is in the room with me. Taken together  the speeches are a book-length argument for constitutional originalism and for  Scalia ’s understanding of the role of judges in the United States. Anyone who wants to understand Scalia as a person and as a judicial philosopher should start by reading this book.
[ Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia  dies at 79]
 Scalia   in my view  is the best justice who has ever served on the Supreme Court in its 227-year history.  He  and Justice Joseph Story are the only two justices to have published books on constitutional and statutory interpretation.  Scalia  articulated a clear philosophy of a judge’s role  to which  he  always adhered.  He  was one of the two best writers ever to serve on the court and was equal on this score to Justice Robert Jackson  known for  his  fine literary style. No other justice traveled so much and spoke to so many audiences in the United States and abroad. Finally   he  was to originalism what Saint Paul was to Christianity — a tireless and widely traveled evangelist of the gospel. Understanding Scalia is thus imperative for all law students  lawyers and educated lay people. Because the book is a collection of speeches  many of which were given to lay people  it is very readable  understandable and fun for most age groups.
“ Scalia  Speaks ” by Antonin Scalia  Edited by Christopher Scalia (Crown Forum)
Addressing the difference between American and European values   Scalia  notes that “the United States was settled primarily by people seeking  in one way or another  refuge from the ways of Europe. The men who founded our Republic did not aspire to emulating Europeans at all — to the contrary  the project of drafting the American Constitution was largely about ensuring that the American people would never languish under the yoke of a European-style government.”
This is a critically important point that many fail to appreciate. The legal academics and public intellectuals who love European socialism overlook the fact that the United States  under its unique Constitution  is the third-most-populous country in the world  covering the fourth-largest territory  and has by far the highest gross domestic product per capita of any of the Group of 20 nations  a strength that allows us to do more to help the poor around the world while offering military defense to a range of countries. Few people choose to move from the United States to other countries  but millions of people want to live here.  Scalia  appreciated that the reason for this is that the U.S. Constitution is an engine of power and economic growth that sustains “life  liberty and the pursuit of happiness.”
As an excellent writer   Scalia  offers advice on the craft. “Time and sweat ”  he  says  are the keys to good writing  and a well-written document emerges only after many drafts. “I think there is writing genius ” he  says  just as there is musical genius  “which consists primarily  I think  of the ability to place oneself in the shoes of one’s audience; to assume only what they assume; to anticipate what they anticipate  to explain what they need explained  to think what they must be thinking; to feel what they must be feeling.”
 Scalia  regrets that most American college and law students never read the Federalist Papers and therefore do not understand our Constitution or the American founding very well.  He  tirelessly urges us to learn from the wisdom of the framers of our Constitution  which so few Americans tend to do.
In a chapter on “Original Meaning ” Scalia reveals that at a conference  he challenged Attorney General Edwin Meese III on how to assess the Constitution’s original intent. Meese argued in favor of a judicial philosophy that searched for the original intentions of the framers. Scalia said he favored searching for the original meaning of the words of the Constitution instead. In his speech at the conference  he strongly set out the case for original public meaning  persuading Meese’s chief of staff  Ken Cribb  by the force of his argument. After  Scalia  finished speaking  Cribb scrawled the word “Stipulated” on a piece of paper and taped it to the podium. Two days later  President Ronald Reagan informed  Scalia  that  he  was going to be nominated to the Supreme Court.
 Scalia  speaks in  his  own words in this magnificent volume that should be on the bookshelf of every educated American.

Output: Positive


Input: Consider Input: What is the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Joe Paterno ? Al Pacino's Joe Paterno  fights for  his  legacy and  his  job at Penn State in the first full trailer for Paterno  the HBO film about the football coach in the aftermath of the Jerry Sandusky child sex abuse scandal.
Directed by Barry Levinson â who previously cast Pacino to lead HBO biopics about Jack Kevorkian (You Don't Know Jack) and Phil Spector (Phil Spector) â Paterno also stars Riley Keough as a newspaper reporter digging into how much the legendary coach  who spent 45 years at the helm of Penn State  knew about the child molestation accusations against Sandusky  a longtime defensive coordinator on  Paterno 's staff.
The film also examines  Paterno 's unceremonious retirement and termination in 2011 and the riots that broke out near campus after  Paterno  was let go. "All these people should be screaming about the victims  not Joe " one student says of the riots in the trailer. The preview also finds Pacino's  Paterno  wrestling with his own relationship with Sandusky.
Less than two months after his firing  Paterno  the winningest coach in college football history  died of lung cancer in January 2012 at the age of 85.  Paterno  premieres April 7th on HBO.

Output: Negative


Input: Consider Input: What is the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Dong Chang ? In 2015  Dr. Dong Chang  the director of the medical intensive care unit at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center  a public hospital in Los Angeles  decided to see whether the care being delivered in his ICU was appropriate.
 Chang  and  his  team also reviewed the use of intensive care at 94 hospitals in two states  Maryland and Washington  focusing on four common conditions that can lead to treatment in an intensive care unit.
 Chang  attributes the difference to doctors using intensive care based on their habits  hunches or training. Profit  he said  may also be a motive  but it didn't appear to be a driving force.
"We really don't have good standards and a good discussion going on about who should receive ICU care  " Chang  said.
The unnecessary intensive care can also be harmful. The study found intensive care patients underwent more invasive procedures  like the insertion of catheters  including central lines  which carry the risk of infection. Overuse of the ICU is bad for patients who don't need it   Chang  said. Survival rates were also no better at the hospitals that used intensive care the most.
Reducing unneeded intensive care stays would save big money. Intensive care costs about $10 000 for a typical stay and accounts for 4 percent of national health care expenditures  according to research cited by  Chang 's team.
 Chang  hesitated to call the overuse of intensive care "wasted" health care spending.  He  said the medical literature calls it "non-beneficial" care  which is maybe a nicer way of saying the same thing.
For O'Neill   her  dispute of the fee for  her  daughter's ear piercing was a trip into the hell of medical billing.
O'Neill is an attorney  so  she  knows how to weed through fine print. But it took  her  untold hours and phone calls to the hospital and  her  insurance company to root out the issue. The hospital had initially billed  her  insurer for the $1 877.86 for "operating room services" related to the ear piercing. The company rightly rejected payment for the cosmetic procedure. So  the hospital billed the family  according to  her  medical and billing records and correspondence.
O'Neill said  she  got nowhere in several conversations with the manager of the hospital's team that deals with payments directly from consumers. Then in mid-July  O'Neill wrote a letter to the manager explaining that they were at an impasse and urged the hospital to cancel the bill.


Output: Neutral