TASK DEFINITION: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
PROBLEM: "I can walk, Mein Fuehrer!  I can walk!"

SOLUTION: No

PROBLEM: My impoverished mother scraped to send my brother and I to Catholic schools whenever we lived near one. They were rigid, & not much room for reflection or self-expression; But the academic, ruler and yardstick discipline - and no girls - did help me learn to focus academically.  
However, I've no empathy for this decision - and I might feel differently if the sexual misbehavior of so many priests hadn't put the Church in the position of the child-molesting pot calling the homosexual-lesbian kettle black.
The Juneau Chapel is a locals & tourists quiet spot of beauty and tranquility. If they don't want Alaskans or visitors of other faiths or of non-heterosexual preferences to use the Catholic Chapel itself for ceremonies - I can understand that - to a degree.. 
But the grounds could certainly accommodate a roofed/open deck for others to engage in positive spiritual sharing on occasion. The Bishop's stance would be quietly clear, yet the Shrine still be spiritually welcoming place to all.

SOLUTION: Yes

PROBLEM: Perhaps the most ignorant thing I have read all day. If it is a choice make it, find the same sex sexually attractive for the next 5 minutes. Then switch back to hetro. Do it. Prove it can happen. 

Either that or you could stop spewing complete nonsense. 

Why would someone choose to be a sexuality that is so hated by society and live as an outcast. Do you actually think out the things you post, or just spew talking points?

SOLUTION:
Yes