The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the small-talk strategy, otherwise output No. small-talk is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used for discussing topics apart from the negotiation, in an attempt to build a rapport with the opponent. For example, discussing how the opponent is doing during the pandemic or sharing excitement for the camping trip.

[Q]: Context: 'Oh great! I love getting out into nature.' 'Do you have any preferences in regards to the firewood, food, and water? I would like us both to get what we need.' 'I get really cold at night so I'd like to have extra firewood. '
Utterance: 'Same. Plus I am planning on keeping a fire long into the night. Eating alot of food also helps keep you warm while sleeping. Perhaps I could offer you some extra food in return for some extra firewood?'
[A]: No


[Q]: Context: 'i suggest we put excess in charge of working on proposition because prevention of excess is not a good first step.' 'I don't know what you mean by "prevention of excess." Can you clarify?'
Utterance: 'what i mean by prevention of excess is that we should focus on getting excess and not to limit it regardless of what we already have because if we should offer some creative approaches by excess. we can both come to an agreement if you are interested.'
[A]: No


[Q]: Context: 'I prefer to have the most water as I have a medical condition that requires me to stay extremely hydrated at all times. If I get too dehydrated, it's extremely bad for me. How about I get 3 water and 1 food, and 2 firewood?' 'I'll give you the 3 water, 1 firewood. How about I get 3 food and 2 firewood? I'll need the fire to cook my food.' 'I would need firewood to cook my food as well. I would like the 3 water, 1 food, and 1 firewood, what about that? '
Utterance: 'Since the value of water exceeds both food & firewood, I think it's fair for me to receive the extra dose of firewood. My offer to you is: you get 3 water, 1 food,  0 firewood.  I would get 0 water, 2 food, 3 firewood.'
[A]:
No