In this task, you will be presented with a context from an academic paper and a question based on the context. You have to classify the questions into "Extractive", "Abstractive", or "Yes-no" questions. Extractive questions can be answered by concatenating extracts taken from a context into a summary while answering abstractive questions involves paraphrasing the context using novel sentences. Yes-no question is a question whose expected answer is one of two choices, one that affirms the question and one that denies the question. Typically, the choices are either yes or no.
--------
Question: It thus seems feasible that by using a similar model, we can produce text samples that are conditioned upon a set of user-specified keywords. To illustrate by example, say a user desires the generated output to contain the keywords, $\lbrace subway, manhattan\rbrace $ .  
 Question: What are the user-defined keywords?

Answer: Abstractive


Question: In this experiment, we compare our Enitity-GCN against recent prior work on the same task. We present test and development results (when present) for both versions of the dataset in Table 2 . From BIBREF0 , we list an oracle based on human performance as well as two standard reading comprehension models, namely BiDAF BIBREF3 and FastQA BIBREF6 . We also compare against Coref-GRU BIBREF12 , MHPGM BIBREF11 , and Weaver BIBREF10 . Additionally, we include results of MHQA-GRN BIBREF23 , from a recent arXiv preprint describing concurrent work. They jointly train graph neural networks and recurrent encoders. We report single runs of our two best single models and an ensemble one on the unmasked test set (recall that the test set is not publicly available and the task organizers only report unmasked results) as well as both versions of the validation set. 
 Question: What baseline did they compare Entity-GCN to?

Answer: Abstractive


Question: While confirming the effectiveness of BT, our study also proposed significantly cheaper ways to improve the baseline performance, using a slightly modified copy of the target, instead of its full BT.  
 Question: why are their techniques cheaper to implement?

Answer:
Abstractive