In this task, you will be presented with a context from an academic paper and you have to write an answerable question based on the context. Your questions can be extractive, abstractive, or yes-no questions.

Ex Input:
We have observed that the conflict model is very sensitive to even minor differences and compensates in such cases where attention poses high bias towards similarities already there in the sequences.

Sequence 1: What are the best ways to learn French ?

Sequence 2: How do I learn french genders ?

Attention only: 1

Attention+Conflict: 0

Ground Truth: 0

Sequence 1: How do I prevent breast cancer ?

Sequence 2: Is breast cancer preventable ?

Attention only: 1

Attention+Conflict: 0

Ground Truth: 0

We provide two examples with predictions from the models with only attention and combination of attention and conflict. Each example is accompanied by the ground truth in our data.

Ex Output:
Do they show on which examples how conflict works better than attention?


Ex Input:
Filter 1: The string match filter deletes all KB triples where the correct answer (e.g., Apple) is a case-insensitive substring of the subject entity name (e.g., Apple Watch). Filter 2: Of course, entity names can be revealing in ways that are more subtle. As illustrated by our French actor example, a person's name can be a useful prior for guessing their native language and by extension, their nationality, place of birth, etc. Our person name filter uses cloze-style questions to elicit name associations inherent in BERT, and deletes KB triples that correlate with them.

Ex Output:
How is it determined that a fact is easy-to-guess?


Ex Input:
Evaluating FastText, GloVe and word2vec, we show that compared to other word representation learning algorithms, the FastText performs best.

Ex Output:

What do you use to calculate word/sub-word embeddings