Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.

[EX Q]: I don't know why anybody's gonna get their panties in a bunch over this election.  Oregon will vote for Hillary Clinton so it doesn't matter if Trump or Cruz win the primary.  One good thing about living in a one party rule state, if you don't vote you don't get those pesky jury duty notices.  (Sarcasm)
[EX A]: No

[EX Q]: I realize that I've been critical of Obama in the past, but when I step back and look at what he's accomplished I have to admit I'm impressed.  Obamacare is a huge advance over what we had (nothing).  Serious action to address climate change.  Appointed highly qualified supreme court justices that aren't hyper political and conservative.

He was far from perfect.  Too much militarism, too cozy with big business and all that.  But given the congress he had to deal with he made more progress can I expected.  And just think if he had lost either election.

The republicans deserve Trump.  And they deserve the drubbing they're going to get.  Bernie or Hillary will crush him.
[EX A]: Yes

[EX Q]: I'm with you on the slimed-down budget. 

Seems to me that we've been getting slimed-down budgets for many years, though. 

A product of slimy legislators immersed in slimy caucuses, me thinks.
[EX A]:
No