instruction:
Given a document, an entity and its sentiment towards the entity, verify if it is the correct sentiment towards the entity. Answer should be yes or no. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].
question:
Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Carter Page is Neutral . FBI had an independent basis for investigating  Carter Page : Our view
 Carter Page  speaks in Moscow in December 2016. (Photo: Yuri Kochetkov/epa)
Thatâs the backdrop to this weekendâs release of a Democratic memo countering what amounted to a Republican hit job on the FBI and the Justice Department for their handling of a wiretap of  Carter Page   a former adviser to the Donald Trump campaign.
The Democratsâ memo neatly counters many of the Republican allegations of sinister doings behind the 2016 wiretap of  Page . The release  by the Republican-led House Intelligence Committee  was as welcome as it was belated. True to form  Trumpâs focus was on himself. He railed against the Democratic memo  tweeting that it âis a total political and legal BUST. Just confirms all of the terrible things that were done. SO ILLEGAL!â
That memo  put out more than three weeks ago  accused the FBI of using an explosive dossier written by former British spy Christopher Steele to persuade a judge on the secret Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court  also known as the FISA court  to grant a warrant for a wiretap in 2016 on  Page . The key allegation: The FBI failed to inform the judge that Steele had been hired to do opposition research funded by Hillary Clintonâs campaign.
Thatâs quite a different picture than the one painted by Republicans  who had hyped the  Page  wiretap as the scandal of the century.
answer:
no


question:
Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Bob Goodlatte is Neutral . Rep. Bob Goodlatte (R-VA)  chairman of the House Judiciary Committee   will not seek re-election in 2018   he  announced Thursday  ending a 13-term run representing Virginiaâs solid-red Sixth Congressional District.
 Goodlatte  made  his  decision known via Twitter  thanking  his  constituents  and in a longer statement posted on  his  website:
Itâs been an honor to serve #VA06 â thank you for your support and trust. Itâs time to step aside. Iâve decided I will not seek re-election. â Bob Goodlatte (@BobGoodlatte6) November 9  2017
âWith my time as Chairman of the Judiciary Committee ending in December 2018  this is a natural stepping-off point and an opportunity to begin a new chapter of my career and spend more time with my family  particularly my granddaughters â  Goodlatte  wrote  adding:
A reliable conservative vote and a former immigration lawyer   Goodlatte  took the reins at the powerful Judiciary Committee in 2013. Immigration and Border Security  being one of the Judiciary Committeeâs subcommittees  had been the most prominent issue dealt with there at the time. He has been a consistent border security hawk and ally of President Donald Trumpâs immigration agenda.
In perhaps his most important move as chairman   Goodlatte  made known that 2013âs so-called âGang of Eightâ amnesty bill would have a tough time in his committee  contributing to the political pressure that prevented the bill from passing the Senate and thereby stopping the âpath to citizenshipâ that would potentially have added tens of millions of Democratic voters to the rolls.
 Goodlatte  later warned against the Obama administrationâs encouragement of the so-called âunaccompanied minorâ surge in these pages  working in the House to oppose President Barack Obamaâs continual attempts at executive amnesty.
Other major issues during  Goodlatte âs tenure as judiciary chairman included human trafficking legislation  government wiretapping authorization  and efforts to combat so-called âovercriminalizationâ from administrative regulation.
With  Goodlatte âs departure  the stakes are raised for 2018âs GOP primary in his district. With a Cook Partisan Voting Index of R+13  VA-6 is a prime target for solid conservatives looking to carry on  Goodlatte âs legacy.
answer:
yes


question:
Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Mark Zuckerberg is Neutral . The closest  Mark Zuckerberg  has come to directly addressing President Donald Trump in public was when  he  wrote that "progress does not move in a straight line" the day after the election in November.
Since then   Zuckerberg  has embarked on  his  own tour of the U.S. that's been compared to a presidential campaign and sparked rumors that the Facebook CEO is considering a 2020 run.
While  Zuckerberg  has been shy to publicly address Trump   he  has in fact spoken with the president multiple times by phone since the election  Business Insider has learned.  Zuckerberg  revealed that  he 's talked with Trump during a surprise dinner with the Moore family in Newton  Ohio two weeks ago.
Exactly what  Zuckerberg  and Trump discussed is unclear —  Zuckerberg  didn't say during  his  dinner with the Ohio family and  his  spokesperson declined to comment. But the discussions show that the Facebook billionaire has held a dialogue with Trump even as  he  publicly opposes policies like Trump's first executive order on immigration. The White House didn't return a request for comment.
 Zuckerberg  and Facebook's relationship with Trump is complicated. Facebook was widely criticized in the wake of the election for its role in the proliferation of so-called fake news  which many believed help Trump win the election.  Zuckerberg  has called that notion "pretty crazy " but Facebook has made significant strides to eradicate fake news stories from its platform.
When Trump called together the tech industry's top leaders for a meeting of the minds in December  Facebook COO Sheryl Sandberg went instead of  Zuckerberg . Before Trump was elected   Zuckerberg  had come to the defense of the Facebook board member and Trump advisor who organized that same meeting with tech leaders  Peter Thiel.
"We care deeply about diversity "  Zuckerberg  wrote in an internal memo to Facebook employees that was leaked in October. "That's easy to say when it means standing up for ideas you agree with. It's a lot harder when it means standing up for the rights of people with different viewpoints to say what they care about. That's even more important."
answer:

no