Craft one correct answer to the question given in input. To make it more interesting, try to use non-stereotypical language if possible. Make sure your correct answer is reasonably long, consistent with the context, and requires common sense (instead of explicit extraction from the context.) In your answer, use as few words as possible from the given context. Use a response that is uncommon/non-stereotypical, so that it is less predictable. To be less repetitive, please vary your language for each question.

Ex Input:
Context: This man who writes for CBS / CNet / ZDNet sounds like he is out of his mind . Not a single person among SYS - CON 's management team has ever heard of his name , had any business relationship with him , or knows who this person is . He was never asked to write for SYS - CON , he was never considered to write for SYS - CON , and he will never write for SYS - CON . 
Question: Why is the man out of his mind ?

Ex Output:
Because he put fraudulent info on his resume .


Ex Input:
Context: They were all relatively young . The bass and guitar players played really well , but they irritated me a little . They seemed to be more interested in talking shop ( let 's compare who knows more obscure stuff about guitars and players ) than focusing and getting things done . Yet , they were very concerned with getting things done when they were hooking up an extra amp to use as a monitor for the drummer . 
Question: What may be a fact about the bass and guitar players ?

Ex Output:
They are less interested in priorities .


Ex Input:
Context: Maybe you talk about what you are thinking , or write about what you are thinking ... but you do n't stress about what you are thinking . it 's not stewing or brooding ... it 's just thinking . And for some reason , the thoughts are clearer , more positive , more decisive than they are at home . 
Question: Why should you you think a certain way ?

Ex Output:

You should n't stress while thinking because that makes things negative .