We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

[Q]: Sent1: The death penalty has not been shown to be more effective than life imprisonment in deterring murder, hence we should choose life imprisonment.
 Sent2: But the statistics don't support the idea that the death penalty is any more effective as a detterent than is a life sentence.
[A]: Similar


[Q]: Sent1: Ask the family members of who he killed if he deserves death.
 Sent2: And because Christ forgave the men that unjustly killed him does not conclusivly show that He was against the death penalty.
[A]: Not similar


[Q]: Sent1: I'm against captial punishment for the reasons that wjim1269 gave and also I think that just because someone murders someone it doesn't mean they should automatically forfeit their own life.
 Sent2: I'm not saying that a child's life is worth more than an adults, I'm saying if they killed any one they forfeit their life, because they in return lose what they took from someone else.
[A]:
Similar