In this task, you're given a statement, and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence clearly disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3' corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.

Q: Statement: This model has value but fails to meet the broader range of information needs of investors who want more forward-looking information and data that reflect a company's overall performance, risk profile, and expectations for future performance. Choices:  1. This model has no value because the range of information it offers is to broad to meet the needs of investors. 2. Information and data that looks forward is what investors want to see more of. 3. We don't see this model being particularly useful when assessing companies on the market.

A: 1
****
Q: Statement: Left to decide what part of the 1996 Act to strike as invalid, the court concluded that congressional intent regarding severability was unclear. Choices:  1. It was decided that the intent of severability was quite clear. 2. As a result, the court left the 1996 Act as it was originally written. 3. The court was able to decide which parts, if any, of the 1996 Act were invalid.

A: 1
****
Q: Statement: just learn to accept and i have two dogs too and they've  slapped the dogs around too  every now and then  so Choices:  1. I have never owned dogs as pets in my life.  2. You can also slap the dogs around too, if you want.  3. They have slapped my dogs around too here and there. 

A:
1
****