Given a document, an entity and its sentiment towards the entity, verify if it is the correct sentiment towards the entity. Answer should be yes or no. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

Example Input: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Davis is Neutral . Davis challenged his conviction and sentence on the grounds that his confession was illegally obtained and that his trial in San Clara County  Calif.  was tainted by pretrial publicity.
 Marc Klaas  Polly's father  expressed frustration Monday that Davis' appeals were taking too long. He noted that Polly would be 28 now had she lived.
Davis' appeals were taking too long. He noted that Polly would be 28 now had she lived.
 "I have no doubt that this guy is going to outlive me " said Klaas  60.
 Davis has a constitutional challenge pending before the state high court. Once that is resolved  he can challenge his conviction and sentence in federal court.
 Assistant California Attorney General Ronald Matthias  who successfully opposed DavisDavis' appeal  said federal appeals could take 10 to 15 years.
 In writing for the court  Justice Joyce L. Kennard recounted DavisDavis' reaction when a jury found him guilty of Polly's murder.
 Davis "turned toward the television cameras in the courtroom and made an obscene gesture with both hands by extending his middle fingers " Kennard wrote. "He then winked his eye and blew a kiss."
 Davis kidnapped Polly from her bedroom at her home in Petaluma  Calif.  where she was having a slumber party with two other girls. Her mother and a younger half-sister were sleeping down the hall.
 Davis had a long and violent criminal record  and his history helped fuel voter support for a 1994 three-strikes initiative in California that required sentences of 25 years to life in prison for a third felony after two violent felonies.
Example Output: yes

Example Input: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Elaine Luria is Negative . The reason I raise this now is because weâve got a candidate seeking the Democratic nomination (and just named to the DCCCâs âRed-to-Blueâ list) in VA-02  Elaine Luria  who voted for Republican Scott Taylor both in the 2016 GOP primary AND in the 2016 general election against the Democratic nominee in VA-02. According to Patrick Wilsonâs report in the RTD (bolding added by me for emphasis):
â Elaine  doesnât make decisions just based on political party â  her  campaign manager said by email. âFaced with the options on the ballot   she  took a chance on fellow veteran Scott Taylor who promised to bring change and be something different  but he broke those promises.â
âLike many Democrats in our district   Elaine  voted against Randy Forbes in that primary because he had shown during his legislative career to be an extreme voice in Congress  particularly when it came to womenâs reproductive freedom  LGBT equality  and preventing gun violence â Luria campaign manager Kathryn Sorenson said by email.
âNow  after seeing the way that Scott Taylor has acted in Washington and the votes he has taken to create chaos in our health care system   Elaine  has decided to run against him.â
Back in January  I had actually asked  Luria  about  her  vote in the GOP primary  and  she  responded: âThat year  there was no Democratic primary for Congress and I wanted to have my voice heard on who was on the ballot.â I responded to  her  that âI would have voted for Mickey Mouse or something in that one.â I havenât heard a word from  her  since. LOL
At this point  I havenât chosen a candidate in VA-02  but itâs been between  Luria  and Karen Mallard  the only two serious contenders for the Democratic nomination  as far as Iâm concerned. But Iâve got to say  the news about  Luria  voting for Taylor really bugs me  for at least three reasons.
First off  I think that Taylor is going to have a field day with this. Already  Taylorâs spokesperson is responding gleefully to the RTD  âScott Taylor is the same guy he was in 2016 and has done everything he said he would on the campaign. The only reason  Luria  is running is because she was promised money by Nancy Pelosi to be another rubber stamp in D.C. The people of the 2nd district will see right through it.â Expect to hear a LOT of that type of language in coming months  and certainly if  Elaine Luria  becomes the Democratic nominee in VA-02. So yeah  I truly do not see how this will help  Luria  win the general election. To the contrary  I think it will hurt  her  that  she  voted not once but twice for the same guy  she  voted for less than two years ago.
So thatâs my âJim Webb testâ for Democratic candidates who used to vote Republican: can you explain  articulately and convincingly  why you used to vote Republican (or even serve in a Republican administration) but are now a Democrat? Regarding  Elaine Luria    she  very well might have such a case to make  but so far I havenât heard it. To the contrary  Iâve mostly heard about how  she  doesnât vote based on party (whatever that means  given the stark differences between Democrats and the Party of Sarah Palin  Ken Cuccinelli  Corey Stewart  E.W. Jackson  Donald Trump  etc.  etc.)  how  Taylor  supposedly wasnât what  she  expected  him  to be  etc.
On that latter point  my friend Josh Stanfield of Activate Virginia posted on  his  groupâs Facebook page this morning something that rings true to me: â Scott Taylor  was a member of the House of Delegates and had a partisan voting record in that body. When  he  ran for Congress in 2016  anyone interested in  his  politics or voting behavior wouldâve been just a few clicks away from discovering  his  opposition to pretty much every Democratic priority.â
Example Output: no

Example Input: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Jared Kushner is Negative . Jared Kushner  President Donald Trumpâs son-in-law and White House adviser  has had  his  security clearance downgraded  Politico reports.
 He  has been downgraded from SCI (sensitive compartmented information) access to Secret level  according to the publication.
All other White House aides working on high-level interim clearances also had their access downgraded  according to a memo reportedly sent to staffers on Friday. Earlier that same day  Trump said he would leave it up to his chief of staff  John Kelly  to decide what access  Kushner  should have.
âGeneral Kelly respects  Jared  a lot and General Kelly will make that call â Trump said at a joint news conference with Australian Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull at the time.
 Kushner  no longer receives the Presidentâs Daily Brief  a top-secret roundup of global issues compiled by intelligence officials.  His  access to the highly classified intelligence briefing has been cut off in the past few weeks  sources told Reuters.
 Kushner  is reportedly accepting the decision and âwill not ask for special permissionâ from the president  according to CNN.
Kusher has the vague title of senior adviser. Throughout  his  career at the White House   he  has been assigned a wide-ranging portfolio on an array of highly sensitive issues â solving the Israeli-Palestinian crisis  keeping the U.S.-Mexico relationship afloat  and heading up diplomacy with China  for example.
âThis action will definitely impact  Kushner âs ability to cure the world of all ills but not necessarily prevent  him  from doing aspects of  his  job â Mark Zaid  a lawyer who specializes in national security law told HuffPost in an email. One of the most significant effects of  Kushner âs clearance downgrade is no longer having access to the Presidentâs Daily Brief  according to Zaid.
Government officials who perform the type of high-level diplomacy  Kushner  is tasked with doing typically get access to highly sensitive raw data about the players involved in the negotiations. Without the highest-level security clearance   Kushner  will have to get a âreduced and more limited versionâ of those background briefings  said Brad Moss  also a national security lawyer.
âIt really undermines  his  ability to do the work  he âs supposed to be doing and makes  him  into more of a figurehead â Moss said.
 Kushner  will also lose access to the National Security Agencyâs intercepted communications  Ned Price  a former White House and CIA official  wrote on Twitter.
âWhether or not  he  couldâve been successful before   he  no longer can be an effective Middle East mediator â Price wrote.
 Kushner âs colleagues have an incentive to block off  Kushner âs access to highly classified information. If they arenât careful  they could lose their own clearances â or even face criminal charges  said Moss.
Ultimately   Kushner âs ability to do  his  job will depend on how strictly people around  him  restrict  his  access to sensitive meetings  calls or documents  Zaid wrote.
White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders refused to answer questions regarding  Kushner âs security clearance during a press briefing earlier Tuesday. Last week  Sanders said  Kushner  would continue the work  he  has been doing whether or not  he  has full security clearance.
Example Output:
yes