In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Comment: Your are so right this man who was sexually abused as a child by his father,should have seeked help. It sounds like the environment he grew up in was a pretty healthy one. full of adults who would have been happy to take him to therapy as a child, to help him cope with the life long scars and visual and physical memories of his body being invaded and abused by a adult man as a child. We could never even begin to imagine the emotional turmoil sexual abuse has on a child. It's the systems fault for not protecting our children! For not providing health and mental care to our children who survive sexual assault. For not showing our children that what was done to their bodies to their lives was wrong! instead the abusers get a slap on the hand, and a stern "don't do it again". Read the article click on the links and you will see that the man who attacked theses rapist was too abused as a child,he was faild by the system. That is who to blame.
Sexual-explicit

Comment: I never thought to look at their$%^&*(*^%$$ pension funds. Poop. Thanks
Non-sexual-explicit

Comment: The Pope and his liberal friends supposedly champion "mercy" but show none for those whose only crime is holding to age-old Catholic doctrine.  They claim to favor "dialogue" but refuse to engage in it with anyone who disagrees with them.  They preach tolerance and love but regularly employ insults and vitriol against those who raise questions.  They are attempting to overturn 2,000 years of Church teaching by means of winks, nods, and footnotes, and arrogantly think they should have a free pass in the implementation of the project.  They will not provide substantive, honest replies to the Filial Correction because they have none.

Non-sexual-explicit