In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: insult and non-insult. Insult is any lanugage or act that is disrespectful or scornfully abusive.

Q: Comment: Here in Philadelphia there were about 50,000. It was very civil in my opinion. People brought their children. One child had a sign: "I am too young to vote but I will remember." A woman had a sign: "I protested in the 60s and today I am protesting in my 60s." There were very few signs relating to abortion and hardly any signs that were vulgar unless the sign on someone's male boxer dog would offend some: "Build a wall and I'll pi** on it." There were signs on immigration, education, climate, human rights, health care - all issues that are important to women. I had a sign with a picture of Pope Francis saying: "Build bridges not walls."  A man with a group from his synagogue smiled and nodded to me when he read my sign.

A: Non-insult
****
Q: Comment: From HopeRobert earlier:  "The guy is either willfully deceitful or jaw dropping stupid."

This.  And then some.  I can't believe that someone would readily walk into a war zone, one in which Westerners almost automatically get a hostile reaction, with a pregnant wife.

The one thing I will say:  given the level of chaos in Afghanistan, it's entirely possible that he and his family were well treated in one place and actively assaulted in another (and, passed from one group to another over the five years).  And, dazzling level of naiveté or not:  just because you're stupid, it doesn't mean you merit that kind of treatment.

...I truly feel sorry for her....

A: Insult
****
Q: Comment: No matter what he says or does, nothing will placate the crowds baying for his demise and the Resurrection of St. Hilary.

A:
Non-insult
****