You are given first 5 messages from a series of message exchanges between 2 persons playing the game of Diplomacy which is an American strategic board game. You need to generate the next message. The message should be generated such that it fits the context seen so far. Avoid the text that is (i) tangent to the context, (ii) repeats the context.

[Q]: ["Good morning my Sultan, how are things? We have a number of common interests (the Balkans, Austria, the Med, Russia) and I'm looking forward to discussing them with you. Please accept this gift of fine Italian Chianti!", 'Buongiorno! I hope we can honestly discuss these interests as well. Are you planning to open agressively?', "Buongiorno!\n\nThere's only so aggressive I *can* be, Sultan! I haven't even mentioned the idea of a Lepanto to Austria and I'm principally focused on getting a build in Tunis or Greece this year. Where are you looking at things?", "Well, I would strongly encourage you to visit Tunis. In return, I'd be happy to offer you support if sometime in the future you decide the map has too much Austria on it.", "Well... Tunis is pretty much guaranteed for me, and it will be there in 1902 if I find juicier fruit in 1901. Are you suggesting I try my luck in Trieste instead, and that you'll be happy to support me the war against Austria that will likely immediately follow? \n\nOne of my friends is in another game where his I and a friendly T are advancing well against a chaotic Russia/Austria alliance."]
[A]: you had me at "against Austria". Yes, I think that the two of us working together against Austria/Russia would be a good plan. And later when we trust each other better I'm sure we could coordinate in the Mediterranean to help you expand westward  while I expand north?


[Q]: ["What's the play, mate? Something I can help with?", 'Whats shaking bacon? You allied with Italy or just in  a hopeful non-aggression until they stab you in the back agreement?', "More the latter. Though at this point I'm likely to just invite him into my dots. 😀", 'Well as one who was in a previous agreement with Italy I would recommend either striking first or moving your units to cover your front.  Italy will turn as soon as you leave a good opportunity.', 'Italy stabs you in the back. What a shock.']
[A]: Might I recommend striking back with your last dying breath? Join me and destroy Italy.


[Q]: ['We should bounce in Bur this turn', 'Hi France! Sorry for the delay - still getting the hang of this app. Why do you think we should bounce in Bur?', "To start, I'd like us to have a good relationship, so I'm starting by telling you what I'm going to do, which is move an Army to Burgundy, ideally to bounce. This allows me to protect in case you were planning on doing something to begin with. Second, bouncing helps you out because Germany's first move with the Munich army is either to move to Burgundy or the Ruhr. If you dont move to Bur, then I'm there and you have to move the Ruhr army back to protect Mun anyway. I think we both have other issues than creating a relatively pointless stalemate here when there are better targets if we work together", 'Interesting. I will have to think it over. What does it look like three years down the road if we’re working together?', 'England destroyed and divided, you in the north sweeping up Russia with support, ive swept down into Italy']
[A]:
Okay - this works for me. I was going into Rohr will adjust my order and bounce. If we work together against England offers a lot of advantages for both of us, especially in the early game.