We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Example Input: Sent1: That doesn't ensure that we don't end up murdering innocent people.
 Sent2: The way I see it people who murder shouldn't be sentenced to death or spend life in the jails we have here there to nice.
Example Output: Not similar

Example Input: Sent1: If somebody is completely innocent and they are executed for a crime they didn't commit (which, with forensics these days, probably will never happen again), that is a problem.
 Sent2: This process is needed in order to ensure that innocent men and woman are not executed for crimes they did not commit, and even with these protections the risk of executing an innocent person can not be completely eliminated.
Example Output: Similar

Example Input: Sent1: The fact remains that life in prison is cheaper than sentencing one to the death penalty.
 Sent2: Without the trials and appeals, death penalty cases would be much cheaper than confining inmates for the rest of their lives.
Example Output:
Not similar