In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: toxic and non-toxic. Toxicity is defiend as anything that is rude, disrespectful, or unreasonable that would make someone want to leave a converation.

Input: Consider Input: Comment: I reckon major employers here fearful of losing their best talent to Amazon have put the squeeze on the Wynne government not to offer any incentives.

Output: Non-toxic


Input: Consider Input: Comment: "I bet you will hear that Trent is no longer in force...."

lol. Before predicting things, ashpenaz, read DISPUTATIONS CONCERNING THE CHRISTIAN FAITH, by Robert Bellarmine, S.J., in which work he argues forcefully for the rationality of Catholic theology against Lutheranism and Calvinism. I doubt Francis will ditch his fellow Jesuit's brilliant work for "Lutheran sacraments or ordinations" or for Luther's two Catechisms (never seriously taken as works of academic theology). I am sure, too, Luther's understanding of the role of the "godly prince," which effectively insisted that a monarch had total control of the church, would not sit well with him (as it didn't sit well with republican Calvin). Your predictions seem to have more affinity within your heart, wanting to assure some pseudo- event, than with current ecumenical theology. You mean well, but prediction is not a pastoral remedy.

Output: Non-toxic


Input: Consider Input: Comment: Piece of shit post from a piece of shit poster.


Output: Toxic