Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.

Q: Bernie has been very consistent, he all about giving freebies to those that don't want to work for anything. He's the lazy peoples hero!

A: No
****
Q: Roberta B. Rinehart - in this country we don't make decisions based on personal preference, but on the Constitution and the basis of natural rights. I'm sorry you're afraid of guns, but your fear should not deprive other people of their natural right to protect themselves in the event of an attack much like what you describe. Rich people who can afford armed guards should not be the only ones who have a hope of being safe in this country.

And, no, getting rid of all the guns would not stop violence from occurring ... it would only make an uneven scenario where the bigger and stronger can overpower the smaller and weaker. Guns are an equalizer and as a woman who avoided being raped because of a gun, I refuse to allow you to make me a victim.

A: Yes
****
Q: For sure there are many tragic stories of this type, as the Indians for some reason resented the Euro-Americans moving in, taking over their lands and moving them out.  We grew up hearing about how the "savages" opposed our Manifest Destiny,  the heroics of the Cavalry, the struggles we had in the "Winning of the West." 

 In Oregon we have historic monuments to whites killed by Indians, such as the "Jedediah Smith Massacre" at Reedsport, the Geisel/Battle Rock monument at Port Orford, etc., but no highway  signage that I know of commemorating Native Americans massacred by whites.  I'd like to see a more balanced, accurate history narrative.
(And  in Eugene, our Parks Department  puts forth that stupid  racist story that Spencer Butte was named for a HBC traveler killed by the Kalapuya!)

A:
No
****