In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: toxic and non-toxic. Toxicity is defiend as anything that is rude, disrespectful, or unreasonable that would make someone want to leave a converation.

[Q]: Comment: The Gang of Seven operates on emotion rather than forethought.  They have a number of seemingly good intentions, but repeatedly fail to learn what it is our community desires.   It is time for new heads to represent the people.
[A]: Non-toxic


[Q]: Comment: I will even vote for her if you and wavecrasher get out of our state.
[A]: Non-toxic


[Q]: Comment: For over a decade, the Metro Vancouver region- and the province of BC as a whole- have needed the provincial govt to demonstrate bold, ambitious leadership by setting out a concise, multi-year policy and spending roadmap for the South of Fraser area...

... that is intended to bring this area up to (44 sq. miles) city of Vancouver public transportation, road, bridge and tunnel standards-

.... and in particular, to provide (246 sq. miles) Surrey and Langley with a legitimate** rapid transit rail network... One that will impress domestic and international onlookers- and potential investors- instead of making them yawn... 

** "Legitimate" rapid transit meaning rail lines that use: separated-from-roadway (IE: elevated); and computer-driven (automated) technologies (similar to the city of Vancouver's Expo, Millennium and Canada Lines),  and not the 19th-century technology "buses on rails" (that have been run along already busy roadways) LRT that Translink's Mayors Council are proposing...
[A]:
Non-toxic