In this task, you will be presented with a context from an academic paper and a question separated with a 
. You have to answer the question based on the context.

[EX Q]: In this paper we have formalized the problem of automatic fill-on-the-blanks quiz generation using two well-defined learning schemes: sequence classification and sequence labeling. 
 Question: Which two schemes are used?
[EX A]: sequence classification sequence labeling

[EX Q]: Experiments ::: Baselines
For comparison, we select several public models as baselines including semantic parsing models: BiDAF BIBREF3, an MRC model which utilizes a bi-directional attention flow network to encode the question and passage;

QANet BIBREF12, which utilizes convolutions and self-attentions as the building blocks of encoders to represent the question and passage;

BERT BIBREF23, a pre-trained bidirectional Transformer-based language model which achieves state-of-the-art performance on lots of public MRC datasets recently;

and numerical MRC models: NAQANet BIBREF6, a numerical version of QANet model.

NAQANet+, an enhanced version of NAQANet implemented by ourselves, which further considers real number (e.g. “2.5”), richer arithmetic expression, data augmentation, etc. Syn Dep BIBREF6, the neural semantic parsing model (KDG) BIBREF22 with Stanford dependencies based sentence representations;

OpenIE BIBREF6, KDG with open information extraction based sentence representations;

SRL BIBREF6, KDG with semantic role labeling based sentence representations;

and traditional MRC models: 
 Question: what are the existing models they compared with?
[EX A]: Syn Dep OpenIE SRL BiDAF QANet BERT NAQANet NAQANet+

[EX Q]: We proposed to use visual renderings of documents to capture implicit document quality indicators, such as font choices, images, and visual layout, which are not captured in textual content. We applied neural network models to capture visual features given visual renderings of documents. Experimental results show that we achieve a 2.9% higher accuracy than state-of-the-art approaches based on textual features over Wikipedia, and performance competitive with or surpassing state-of-the-art approaches over arXiv. We further proposed a joint model, combining textual and visual representations, to predict the quality of a document. Experimental results show that our joint model outperforms the visual-only model in all cases, and the text-only model on Wikipedia and two subsets of arXiv. These results underline the feasibility of assessing document quality via visual features, and the complementarity of visual and textual document representations for quality assessment. 
 Question: Which is more useful, visual or textual features?
[EX A]:
It depends on the dataset. Experimental results over two datasets reveal that textual and visual features are complementary.