Categorize the comment on the basis of severe toxicity. If the comment is severely toxic output Yes, otherwise output No.

Q: OK, I don't agree with lumping all of them together. But I do share a certain amount of your cynicism. When that idiot Reagan beat Carter, I added that to my "Ten Top Reasons Our Species is Doomed" list.

-- Paul

A: Yes
****
Q: The Republican Party has and is failing the Owner-State. Since the GOP rented their party to the oil industry in exchange for political immortality, the interests of the Owner-State have taken a back seat to the oil & gas lobby. How else does one explain the resurrection of the Party of the Corrupt Bastards from what should have been political purgatory? 

Absolute power corrupts absolutely. Hence the Petroleum Party of Alaska and its branded minions in the legislature refuse to exercise oversight in re the tax credits. 

We now have the idiotic policy of legislators cutting education and services to disabled Seniors so we can afford to give corporate welfare to (for example) an outside oil and gas corporations who handed out $100,000 Christmas bonuses to their employees nationwide in 2015. 

If Alaskans are paying attention, the RPA's brand will end up in the trash-heap of history this Fall.

A: Yes
****
Q: The solution Randall was provided by Professor Johnathan Gruber of MIT who wrote most of the ACA for the Obama crowd. And as you recall his recorded comments  were that the American public is so stupid they  will buy into the programs even though it raises all costs, does not improve health care delivery, and there are not enough doctors to service the basic system.  It wasn't enough that Obama illegally stole 600+billion from MEDICARE to help pay for the illegal program, that theft of dedicated funds still has not been corrected by the courts but some issues have. So just where is Mrs. Martell/Murkowski going wrong?

A:
No
****