In this task, you must classify if a given review is positive/negative, indicating your answer as P or N.
--------
Question: " holy man " boasts a sweet , gentle , comic performance from an unusually subdued eddie murphy and a few moderately funny skits .
unfortunately , to get to the good stuff you have to sit through a painfully long set - up , loads of tedious filler , interminable shots of jeff goldblum stammering and twitching ,
a superfluous romantic subplot and quite possibly the most annoying performance of robert loggia 's career .
if ever a movie screamed " wait for video so you can fast - forward through all the dull and annoying parts
, " this is it .
eddie murphy plays g , a robed nomadic pilgrim wandering the land enjoying the moment and spreading his spiritual message .
a chance meeting with ricky hayman ( goldblum ) ,
a stressed - out executive of a home - shopping channel , and kate newell ( kelly preston ) , a no - nonsense media analyst , results in physical injury to g . quicker than you can say " the odd couple ,
" g ends up rooming with an extremely leery ricky .
after some script gymnastics , g appears live on the air at the good buy shopping network , wreaking havoc on the cheesy product demonstrations , enraging network owner mr .
mcbainbridge ( loggia ) , and becoming a national media sensation .
" holy man " attempts to be several things at once .
it tries to satirize home shopping networks , but it 's difficult to effectively make fun of something that is already a self - parody .
the film attempts to teach us that collecting material possessions is merely a futile attempt to fill the spiritual holes in our hearts , but that 's common knowledge already .
" holy man " also tries to present a story of redemption , as ricky hayman tries to decide whether to exploit g 's good will to achieve financial security or do the right thing at the expense of his career .
anyone want to place a wager on his final decision ?
the one genuine asset in " holy man " is eddie murphy , who gives a charming performance , sharing love , good will and relevant advice to all those around him , while beaming his million dollar smile at just the right moments .
murphy is delightful and the film takes off whenever he 's onscreen .
unfortunately , he 's not onscreen enough .
jeff goldblum gets the lion 's share of screen time and his tired storyline weighs the proceedings down .
as his potential love interest , kelly preston tries to brighten things up , but she transforms from an all - business media shark to an empathic softy far too quickly and the abrupt change reeks of contrivance .
the other principal actor , robert loggia , wastes his talents in a one - note turn as a ruthless , screaming monster .
structurally unsound and way too long
, " holy man " is appealing when murphy is onscreen and dull
when he is n't . instead of dropping your money at the theater for this trifle , wait until it hits video and fast - forward past everything except the murphy scenes .
g suggests that we focus on enjoying the moment and that 's the best way to do so .

Answer: N


Question: set in the wild west , this carry on centres around the arrival of the rumpo kid ( sidney james ) and his cronies in stodge city .
his dodgy dealings and summary shootings aggravate judge burke ( kenneth williams ) so much that he asks sheriff albert earp ( jon pertwee ) to drive rumpo out of town .
instead , the rumpo kid shoots the sheriff dead .
therefore , judge burke sends for a law marshall to come in and clean up the city .
due to a misunderstanding , an english sanitary engineer called marshall p .
knutt ( jim dale ) is assigned , without knowing it , as the law marshall for stodge city .
he arrives at the same time as annie oakley ( angela douglas ) who is seeking revenge for her father , the sheriff 's murder .
when marshall arrives at stodge city , he soon becomes aware of the misunderstanding and due to his rather limited intellect , he is manipulated by the rumpo kid and always ends up getting things wrong .
in the end , there is a head - to - head between rumpo and marshall .
with the rumpo 's past experience , it would seem that marshall is out of his depth , but using his sanitary skills and learning the ways of the west from annie oakley , he at least stands some chance !
sid james , with an american accent , is perfect as the rumpo kid , a part which suits him down to the ground .
jim dale provides one of his best carry on performances as the stupid sanitary engineer , and angela douglas is very effective in her role as the revengeful daughter .
other regulars that appear in this movie include charles hawtrey and bernard bresslaw ( in his debut ) as big heap and little heap respectively .
big heap is the local indian leader and the crazy casting of hawtrey for this part is very amusing , as is his performance : - he steals every scene he is in even though he does not enter the film until thirty minutes past .
joan sims provides useful and amusing support as belle , the local bar owner who takes a fancy to the rumpo kid .
however , the part of doc played by peter butterworth and sheriff albert earp played by jon pertwee are not really necessary , and pertwee 's performance is rather poor .
kenneth williams uses a new voice but struggles with the weak part of the ' judge ' .
even so , this carry on
was sid james and kenneth williams ' favourite .
a very different carry on film , in that it is played more seriously by the actors and possesses more realism than any other carry on .
the death count is the highest of any carry on film .
sets , costumes and action sequences are all very commendable .
the songs that are included in the movie ( the title song and annie 's song ) are very impressive .
a strange but therefore very interesting carry on film .
not the best of its kind
but it is certainly the most distinctive film of the series .

Answer: P


Question: wong kar - wei 's " fallen angels " is , on a purely visceral level , one of the most exciting films i 've seen in a long while .
unfortunately , wong seems more interested in experimenting with his camera than creating tangible characters for the audience to root for .
ordinarily , that alone would be enough to sink a movie , but in the case of " fallen angels " , this is not so .
every shot in this film is exciting
just to * look
* at .
wong
does really interesting things with the camera , but he does n't allow the pyrotechnics to completely take over , as was the case with last years dismal " knock off " ( which contained a shot of a foot entering a shoe . ugh . )
the movie follows three pairs of lost souls as they struggle to find some meaning in their lives .
i ca n't say much more than that as i did n't really know what was going on most of the time .
in fact , it was n't until about halfway through the movie that i was able to distinguish between each character .
the constantly moving camera does n't really allow for the audience to associate with any one character .
we 're always kept at a distance from these people , i suppose in order to further add to the feeling of alienation felt by the characters .
" fallen angels " is
a refreshing change - of - pace from most hollywood films , which never bother to try anything different , at least on a visual level .
in fact , i 'd go so far as to say that " fallen angels " is more challenging visually than any mainstream hollywood film i 've ever seen .
sure , there 's directors like robert rodriguez who enjoy turning violence into operatic orgies of death , but to see a filmmaker like wong who actually assaults the senses with images is
truly something worth celebrating .
but if wong wishes to become a legendary filmmaker , he needs to work on incorporating an actual story into those awesome images .
there were far too many instances during " fallen angels " in which i asked myself , " now who are these people again ?
is this that first couple or the second couple ?
"
it was impossible to keep track .
perhaps he could let the audience know right away which character is which , by introducing them to us with " name cards " , as in scorsese 's " mean streets " .
that 's really besides the point , though .
wong kar - wei has proven himself , through very few films , that 's
he 's a movie - maker to watch .
let 's just hope that he hones his storytelling skills with his next few movies .

Answer:
P