The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the self-need strategy, otherwise output No. self-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to create a personal need for an item in the negotiation, such as by pointing out that the participant sweats a lot to show preference towards water packages.

[Q]: Context: 'Hello - I would love be able to split some supplies with you🙂. I could use some extra firewood so maybe i could take 3 and maybe you could have some extra food? ' 'Maybe I could take 2 firewood 2 food and 0 waters?'
Utterance: 'I was planning on staying up all night and keeping my fire going all night.  Honestly I could give you all the extra food if that helps you if I could please have the 3 firewood?  We could split the waters'
[A]: Yes


[Q]: Context: 'I can't do that. Truth is I need the firewood and I was hoping you didn't need it. I propose I keep 1 firewood, 3 waters and 2 food and you take the rest?' 'I would do this instead: 3 firewood, 1 water and 2 food.' 'That's not going to be a fair offer, you'll need to do better than that or I don't think we can come to an agreement'
Utterance: '3 firewood, 1 water, 0 food'
[A]: No


[Q]: Context: 'The weather is going to be really hot. Could I have 2 water in exchange for you receiving 2 food and 2 firewood?' 'I have a low immune system and need to stay warm how about I get all 3 firewood in exchange for the 2 water. ' 'I will agree to 3 firewood for 2 water. Maybe I should extra food though so 2 food for me🙂'
Utterance: 'I can agree to 2 food. You get 2 and I will get 1 food. That sounds fair to me. 🙂'
[A]:
No