We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Q: In the case where the intent and means to kill are present and no alternative presents itself, no.

A: Invalid
****
Q: The definitions of terms I used were a simplistic formulation of those found in texts, with differing points enhanced.

A: Invalid
****
Q: Hellno is right, capital punishment should be much more cost effective than the alternative- life in prison without parole.

A:
Valid
****