In this task, you are given books product reviews in English language. The goal is to classify the review as "POS" if the overall sentiment of the review is positive or as "NEG" if the overall sentiment of the review is negative.

Example Input: vampire Christopher . Christopher Byron's sensibility indicates that he is a small-minded, pathologically envious little weasle of a man, who tries to puff up his empty meaningless life by attempting to denigrate a great woman who has brought great beauty and grace to our culture.  Unless you're one of those nasty-spirited people who find glee in joining the pack of hyenas who hate powerful, brilliant, talented women because the light from great women's souls is too bright and reveals too vividly your pathetic life, avoid this book. Byron is simply a mean little vampire, trying to suck money and notoriety from the life blood of Martha.  Shame on John Wiley &amp; Sons for publishing this book
Example Output: NEG

Example Input: Laugh Out Loud On Every Page . I had never heard of The Borowitz Report until a couple of days ago, when a girl in my dorm showed me this book.  I opened it up to a random page and saw the headline "Bush May Lack Gene For Human Speech."  I started giggling as I read the piece and by the end of it I was laughing hysterically.  This happened again and again as I flipped through the book until I realized I was laughing out loud on every page.  No book has ever made me done that before.  (As for my TV viewing habits, I am a huge fan of The Daily Show and this book is right up there with it.)    The book is based on a daily e-newsletter called The Borowitz Report which I have now signed up to receive every day.  If the guy can manage to write columns each day that are as funny as the ones in this book, I don't know how he does it.  This book is at the very top of my list of recommendations.  You won't be sorry you got it
Example Output: POS

Example Input: I Don't get.... . why prior books that are far better researched have the lifespan of milk, while Goldberg who's story is surely contrived, gets five star reviews. Seems like working at The New Yorker and Washington Post trumps...    Danny Rubenstein's "The People of Nowhere"  Amira Hass' "Drinking the Sea at Gaza"  and Wendy Orange' "Coming Home to Jerusalem"     ...and many others who were deeply engaged journalists drop off the book list. Surely these now out of print books covered the same turf but none are connected to Goldberg's. WHY? Is it all about connections and pr? I think yes. What do you think?
Example Output:
NEG