The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.

[Q]: Context: 'Hello!  I'm going to be heading out on a big camping trip and will need to take some extra supplies.  Are you going camping as well?' 'I am also going camping! What do you think you're going to need the most of? What are your preferences?' 'It's going to be hot during the day where I'm going so I'll need some extra hydration.  So water is my main priority.'
Utterance: 'Got it! I am going to need the most of food. There aren't any animals or berries that I feel safe eating where I'm going.'
[A]: No


[Q]: Context: 'hmmm, well what are you looking to get' 'Well, I think that for us staying warm is more important than having extra food. What if I took extra fire wood and you took extra food?' 'That could work, were not really looking to have a big fire'
Utterance: 'Where do you stand on water? We're low , and may need extra in case the fires go out of control'
[A]: Yes


[Q]: Context: 'hii' 'Do you have an idea of how you'd like to split up the extra supplies?' 'yes food mostly must of one. and the used of firewood.'
Utterance: 'I was hoping to get some extra food just in case my kids get hungry. Would you be ok if I took 2 food and you could have 2 of the rest?'
[A]:
Yes