In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

[EX Q]: Comment: You are all of you so stupid. Where was the dog? The dog was on his owners property. The shooter broke the law, the shooter was not in danger. The shooter aimed at a sitting still dog. The dog had a shock collar that kept it inside the property. The shooter should be charged with destruction of property, harassment, and unlawful discharge of a weapon in city limits. Throw the GOD DAMN BOOK AT HIM!
[EX A]: Obscene

[EX Q]: Comment: Any income they receive from their "story" should go towards the cost of rescue from their fraudulent experience.
[EX A]: Non-obscene

[EX Q]: Comment: Alaskans are some of the biggest hypocrites. They're always whining about congress and "Washington" but every two years they keep sending the same guy that's been in office since the Nixon administration back to DC. 

Supposedly Alaska has a whole bunch of so-called "independent" voters who "vote the person, not the party". But the independent voter in Alaska is a total myth . Otherwise, how can the same republican has hold office for 43 straight years? In reality independent in Alaska means a republican who's trying to pretend to be a sophisticated voter. Its like the Tea Party...which was nothing more than a rebranding exercise by republicans who were trying to skip out on the responsibility for rabidly supporting and twice electing George W. Bush, the worst president in American history. 

PS. Apologies to those of you who are truly independent in your voting habits...I know there are a few of you out there.
[EX A]:
Non-obscene