We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.
--------
Question: Attorney General John Ashcroft, for example, says that the second amendment protects an individual right to bear arms, but he has also stated that he supports the extension of the Federal Assault Weapons Ban.

Answer: Valid


Question: Similar semiautomatic firearms with high-capacity magazines have been used in most major mass shootings in the United States in the past 30 years.

Answer: Valid


Question: So in the classroom (where ammunition is prohibited) students handle firearms, and practice "dry firing" them (pulling the trigger when there is no ammunition in the gun.

Answer:
Valid