TASK DEFINITION: We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.
PROBLEM: Sent1: If someone is bad enough to be considered for the death penalty then they must have had sure evidence that they are guilty if they are then they shouldn't deserve the right to live among people they could kill
 Sent2: An argument for putting people to death is so that they can never escape and kill again.

SOLUTION: Not similar

PROBLEM: Sent1: But killing someone because of him killing someone is quite hypocritical.
 Sent2: if a person kills another person it is murder, whether it is sanctioned by the state or not.

SOLUTION: Similar

PROBLEM: Sent1: If these are indeed comparable, I wouldn't argue for the death penalty even in murder.
 Sent2: As far as the deterrent argument, I have said this before, and I will say it again: There is no accurate way to measure if the death penalty is deterring crime or not.

SOLUTION:
Not similar