In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Example Input: Comment: Jesus H. Christ, it's about time someone published this! This is the information that need to be plastered on mainstream media.  We will loose this fight and that's a god damn guarantee! It's asshole's who post Youtube videos of their suction dredging and drool over their fucking miniscule amounts of Au in front of the entire world who has fucked us! This Asshole, Dave Mc Cracken and his Happy Camp Methadone patients that go into peoples back yards with their 6" Proline's and dredge their birdbaths because they can is fucking bullshit!!  Happy Camp, California needs to go! he IS the clown that brought ALL of this bullshit from the Left. Why you ask? Well I'll fucking tell you why since no one else will. Seriously, 70 fucking miles this asshole had claimed for his newbies to royally piss off the Karuk not to mention the other people who live up there. NEWSFLASH!! Why didn't HE defy the ban and get arrested in '15 to show the world his stand instead of his brainwashed assholes? Fuck him!
Example Output: Obscene

Example Input: Comment: I'd like to share a comment written in response to the article "Clarity beyond clericalism: Bishop Long at the Royal Commission" published in the Australian on-line journal "Eureka Street." The article elicited this response from one reader, who referred to Catholic schools:

"If there were a significant risk of abuse, then enrolments would have fallen off dramatically. They haven't... so I conclude this is a witch-hunt...and not a realistic assessment of any widespread problem."

To describe Australia's Royal Commission into Institutional Child Sexual Abuse as an unrealistic "witch-hunt" addressing a manufactured problem sounds bizarre to me.  However, this commentator is not alone; there are others.

Those of us who believe Church reform is sine qua non need to be talking to these folks.  Conversation can be a slow process, but if there is no meeting of minds, no willingness to listen, we're dead in the water.
Example Output: Non-obscene

Example Input: Comment: I don't even try and contain my contempt for the BC 'Liberals'  and I am not concerned with who wins the may 9th election so long as it is not this corrupt, thoughtless, and elitist bunch.  Any party, or any combination of parties, would have more interest in the economy and the people and the environment of BC.
Example Output:
Non-obscene