In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: toxic and non-toxic. Toxicity is defiend as anything that is rude, disrespectful, or unreasonable that would make someone want to leave a converation.

Input: Consider Input: Comment: Stupid dishonest people got into bed with stupid dishonest health insurance companies and made a bad law.  Stupid dishonest people who control congress now, promised to fix this mess (repeal) but won't.  As a self employed person who now cannot afford health insurance, I have to pay a "shared responsibility " tax.  This is madness.  I have never hated government so much as I do now.

Output: Toxic


Input: Consider Input: Comment: another idiot left winger of hate with no clue what the swamp is, see loser is the system, the career bureaucracy that has grown so large and interfering in society its holding back the economy, try again this time learn something before you look so stupid.

Output: Toxic


Input: Consider Input: Comment: Yes, it would be lovely if we agreed this should be the first of our "traditional doctrines." St. Justin Martyr knew Greek philosophy very well, and the philosophical schools all hold "reason," "logos," in high regard in one way or another (it becomes an especially important technical term among the Stoics), Plato being the first to make a direct association between human beings' mental faculties and the transcendent. And of course this celebration of the practice of using our heads, doubting, questioning, exploring, speculating, judging, evaluating, being "critical" in the correct sense of that Greek-origin word, is not much in evidence in the biblical tradition.

Rufinus quotes one of the Desert Fathers he interviewed, giving an excellent Platonic answer to a question about the origin of the virtues: "The mother of all the virtues is diákrisis," that word meaning discernment, discretion, and discrimination, all at once.


Output: Non-toxic