In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

[EX Q]: Comment: Max Sword blatant nepotism is disturbing and I'm happy that all this attention and scrutiny is curbing Hawaii's back scratching culture of bribery and corruption...at least in this case. Sword's wife WORKED for Chapman. Conflict of interest much.
[EX A]: Non-sexual-explicit

[EX Q]: Comment: Yes, whatever precedent or wording or function that can be found, to remove Meredith from the Senate - a man few Canadians consider worthy of dignity or respect. Men like him, with financial power and connections, who groom teen aged girls for sex, are a dime a dozen in Canada. The Senate risks wide perception of total uselessness if Meredith remains.
[EX A]: Non-sexual-explicit

[EX Q]: Comment: A post that says "Putin's Pussies" is left to stand while a post that said merely "grow up" has been removed.

The Globe is in open cahoots to silence one point of view.  I will be taking this to the OPC.
[EX A]:
Sexual-explicit