We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Example Input: Sent1: i think that life without opportunity of parole is the more humane and just punishment instead of the death penalty.
 Sent2: People generally think that the death penalty is worse than life without parole (certainly most criminals seem to think so).
Example Output: Not similar

Example Input: Sent1: An argument regarding the death penalty should be confined to discussions regarding those who have been wrongly convicted and sentenced to death.
 Sent2: The debate question asks "Should the death penalty be legalized?"
Example Output: Not similar

Example Input: Sent1: , I believe the death penalty has deterred at least some people from committing murder.
 Sent2: I believe that people who have killed, raped, tortured, or have done any other extreme act of violence should get the death penalty.
Example Output:
Not similar