We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

[EX Q]: Sent1: I pointed out that the US has higher levels of gun crime than most developed nations while you tried to focus on a few tragedies in response to someone questioning the claim that criminals will always get guns.
 Sent2: This question has pretty much become a circus, with you trying to convince me that ccw states will not pursue illegal carriers, and that if you have a gun, all the criminals will have a gun.
[EX A]: Not similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: Police do not know how many guns are in the state or where they are.
 Sent2: I bet all those stranded survivors felt safe in New Orleans without guns knowing the Police was there to protect them.
[EX A]: Not similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: Second, the only reason that you would bother notifying the police is if you think there is some possibility that the person will be charged with trying to illegally obtain a gun.
 Sent2: The first thing you need to do when someone is charged with a crime is understand what the charge is and what must be proved.
[EX A]:
Not similar