In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

Input: Consider Input: Comment: You are ridiculously uninformed. For your sake, sorry the Gov. is going to veto the LIO Taj Mahawker that you said we should buy a few weeks back, which tells me all I need to know about your ability to rationalize coherently and responsibly.

Output: Non-identity-attack


Input: Consider Input: Comment: seems to me Dick your padding your assumptions a bit about the "largest voice of the people". 
  The largest voice of the Conoco caucus maybe and the oil lobby...,..but it seems like the people only get two minutes, and the oil lobbyists and legislators get richer..

Output: Non-identity-attack


Input: Consider Input: Comment: Sure, tomcorker - that's why his press secretary blamed muslims after the shootings at the Quebec City mosque: "It's a terrible reminder of why we must remain vigilant. And why the president is taking steps to be proactive, not reactive.'' 

And don't get him started about those Mexican terrorists...


Output: Identity-attack