TASK DEFINITION: In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence can be inferred from the statement. Incorrect choices change the meaning in important ways or have details that are not mentioned in the statement. Indicate your answer as 1,2, or 3 corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.
PROBLEM: Statement: Luckily for Mr. Inglethorp, he had been able to produce an unimpeachable alibi.  Choices:  1. Inglethorp invented an excuse that was too good to be true. 2. Inglethorp was a shrewd man, with lying being one of his specialties. 3. The alibi was quickly cracked and disregarded, leaving Inglethorped forked.

SOLUTION: 1

PROBLEM: Statement: As for the statement relating to the destruction of the will, the prisoner had formerly practiced at the Bar, and was perfectly well aware that the will made in his favour a year before was automatically revoked by his stepmother's remarriage.  Choices:  1. The prisoner tried to have the will remade to be more favour some to himself. 2. The prisoner knew that the will made in his favour the prior year was revoked when his stepmother remarried. 3. The prisoner was once a lawyer before he was captured.

SOLUTION: 2

PROBLEM: Statement: Many injured ED patients are screened with a BAC, which can help identify intoxication. Choices:  1. A BAC is the best screening method for patients. 2. Screening using a BAC can be good for picking up intoxication. 3. BAC are not used for screening injured patients.

SOLUTION:
2