In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Q: Comment: Come on Darin.  Did you really think you could run for an elected position and your past would never come up?  I could see past discretions like theft when you were a teenager/young man but masturbating in public when you were 29 years old as part of your 3rd conviction for public indecency?  Your past is a reflection of your character and your multiple thefts and public masturbation convictions make it very clear to me that you are not qualified for the position you sought after.

A: Sexual-explicit
****
Q: Comment: There seems to be plenty of corruption in Washington DC, and established political sycophants routinely come out on the wrong side... Yet our media seems fixated on chasing accusations or facilitating myths. 

Drain the swamp!!!

A: Non-sexual-explicit
****
Q: Comment: former drama teacher Trudeau who inherited his arrogance, stubbornness and disdain for parliament from PET and has neither the intellect nor inclination to answer questions with anything but a handful of prescripted generic non-answers ..."
-
distance from the bar or not it is a truth that is universally acknowledged
real truth not fake

A:
Non-sexual-explicit
****