We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

[Q]: Sent1: There are many countries with lower murder rates than the U.S. and no death penalty.
 Sent2: If the death penalty deters murder (as you claim) then why does Europe have a lower murder rate even though they've outlawed the death penalty?
[A]: Similar


[Q]: Sent1: As of yet, we have not seen fact one that even one innocent person has been put to death.
 Sent2: "We know for a FACT that innocent people have been put to death already"- then give me their names.
[A]: Similar


[Q]: Sent1: Rehabilitation is one goal that one has for punishment but other goals might include:
 Sent2: I said that the definition and what I said are the same, because the one who is being rehabilitated is still being punished with suffering or pain and it is accomplishing the goal of them learning right from wrong.
[A]:
Similar