Given a document, an entity and its sentiment towards the entity, verify if it is the correct sentiment towards the entity. Answer should be yes or no. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Mitch Trubisky is Positive . If Bears quarterback  Mitch Trubisky  took one step forward against the Bengals  the Lions harassed  him  into taking two steps back. Such is the uneven rhythm of a rookie  the context that frames  Trubisky âs bad starts as much as the good ones. Gaudy numbers â 31 of 46 for 314 yards and one touchdown â were offset by three interceptions that resulted in a paltry passer rating of 66.8.
No  but  Trubisky  displayed  his  worst judgment of the season â or at least since  his  first start Oct. 9 â when  he  forced the ball into double coverage trying to hit Dontrelle Inman that resulted in a Cutleresque interception in the end zone.  He  never saw safety Quandre Diggs step in front of Inman for a gift. âTis the season  apparently.
âI just lost  him  in my vision ââ  Trubisky  said. âIâve got to throw the ball away so we can get a field goal.ââ
 Trubisky âs first pick came when  he  sailed a pass over Kendall Wrightâs head that cornerback Darius Slay caught before going out of bounds  one of two interceptions by âBig Playâ Slay. Interestingly  the errant throw occurred on a slow-developing play-action pass out of the shotgun with  Trubisky  rolling left  when  his  accuracy tends to become more iffy. Slay also identified  Trubisky  as a young quarterback who locked in on his receivers  which  Trubisky  disputed.
no

Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Michael Cohen is Positive . "In a private transaction in 2016  I used my own personal funds to facilitate a payment of $130 000 to Ms. Stephanie Clifford "  Michael Cohen  said in a statement. "Neither the Trump Organization nor the Trump campaign was a party to the transaction with Ms. Clifford  and neither reimbursed me for the payment  either directly or indirectly."
Just weeks before the 2016 election   Cohen  reportedly created a private LLC to pay Clifford  otherwise known as Stormy Daniels  following an alleged July 2006 encounter with Trump  The Wall Street Journal reported in January
Following initial reports last month that  Cohen  had made the payment   he  said in a statement that Trump "vehemently denies" any encounter between the two.
In January   the organization Common Cause filed complaints with the Federal Election Commission and the Justice Department  alleging that the reported payment to Clifford constituted a campaign finance violation. But on Tuesday   Cohen 's statement denied that accusation and said the monetary exchange was "lawful" and "not a campaign contribution."
"The payment to Ms. Clifford was lawful  and was not a campaign contribution or a campaign expenditure by anyone "  Cohen  said.
 Cohen  also said  he  filed a reply with the FEC  but that filing will not be public until the agency has resolved the matter.
When asked why  he  made the payment   Cohen  told CNN: "Just because something isn't true doesn't mean that it can't cause you harm or damage. I will always protect Mr. Trump."
yes

Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Benjamin Netanyahu is Neutral . Both Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu left meetings with the US at the General Assembly convinced that Trump is serious about a Middle East peace plan  Haaretz reported at the time.
Hamas is considered by Israel and the US  as well as other countries  to be a terrorist organization.  Netanyahu  has made  it  clear  he  has strict demands before Israel engages with a Palestinian government that includes Hamas  including recognizing Israel  breaking its ties with Iran  and dismantling its military wing.
"We expect everyone who talks about a peace process to recognize the State of Israel and  of course  the Jewish state  " Netanyahu  said last week. "We cannot accept fake reconciliation on the Palestinian side that comes at the expense of our existence."
Given  Netanyahu 's current stance  though  a Fatah-Hamas reconciliation could doom negotiations  Daniel Kurtzer  a former US Ambassador to Israel and Egypt  told Business Insider.
" Netanyahu  can do what  he  wants to do  and thus far  he  appears irreconcilably opposed to PLO-Hamas reconciliation " Kurtzer said in an email. "If the Palestinians do reconcile on a reasonable basis and if  Netanyahu 's attitude doesn't change  it will be impossible to reach negotiations now."
Similar talks have started before  though  and have not been successful. The current discussions happening this week in Egypt are reportedly ignoring the issue of Hamas' military wing  even as both  Netanyahu  and Abbas have demanded demilitarization.
Without the backing of both factions  Abbas does not have the ability to say he speaks for all Palestinians  a reason  Netanyahu  has offered in the past to avoid negotiations.
"Mr. Netanyahu and  his  government were using Palestinian division as an excuse not to make peace " Saeb Erekat  the chief Palestinian negotiator when Fatah-Hamas talks ended the 2014 US negotiations  said at the time.

yes