In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

[EX Q]: Comment: Trolls should stay under the bridge.
Old tactic; if you can't refute the message - attack the messenger
[EX A]: Non-obscene

[EX Q]: Comment: 100yrs from now... 

"ah yes, ol' standoff szajkowski, i remember him well.  boy, nobody could pull off a standoff like joe; he had a real talent for it.  so talented in fact that he began teaching standoff tactics 101 at the local community college.  tell that guy to do something and he'd stonewall your ass til' the cows came home.  ya know, a lot of people didn't know this about joe, but he was a phenomenal badminton player too.  yep, i didn't believe it either when i first heard.  but it's true.  they used to call 'em ol' shuttlecock szajkowski.  wonder whatever happened to that standoff-havin' shuttlecock whackin' crazy sonofabitch?"
[EX A]: Obscene

[EX Q]: Comment: This garbage journalism is copy and paste laziness. 

What does climate change science know? 
They know a lot but not enough to say their CO2 HELL is as real as they say the planet isn’t flat and smoking causes cancer.
But they are sure the planet is really not flat.

Exaggerating and abusing vague climate change science makes another 35 years of disbelief certain and unstoppable. 
*Even Occupy no longer mentions CO2 in it's list of demands.
[EX A]:
Non-obscene