The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the self-need strategy, otherwise output No. self-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to create a personal need for an item in the negotiation, such as by pointing out that the participant sweats a lot to show preference towards water packages.

Context: 'No. I won't part with any firewood because I can't stand being cold, and you can have 2 foods if you have a larger group if you give me 1 water. 🙂🙂' 'Sorry, that's not going to work for me.  ☹️ You have a water purifier? Doesn't sound like extra water is necessary.  I am in a hot, dry climate.  I can give up all the firewood to you, if you can leave me the three packages of food.  I would also like 2 waters.  ' 'Sorry but I'm willing to give up all the water for 1 food at least. I already mentioned above that I don't plan on hunting or fishing and I plan on being out for a while. That's my final offer.'
Utterance: 'Okay, I will leave you all the firewood and 1 food, and I will take two food and three water packages. I am willing to finalize that.☹️'
No

Context: 'I dont need the firewood as much. ' 'That is great for me. I guess i will take all three.🙂' 'sure what other preferences would you like '
Utterance: 'I need a lot of water too. Thank you for understanding.'
Yes

Context: 'not soo good, i am hungry' 'Uh oh. What are you preferences on supplies?' 'food, then water, then firewood, and yours?'
Utterance: 'water, food then firewood. It's really hot so I need to make sure we are hydrated. We forgot a bag of supplies that had mostly food so we really could use food. It's hot so firewood isn't necessary. If anything we can get it from around or on a hike.'

Yes