We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

Input: Consider Input: The 2nd Amendment doesn't say you have to be in a militia or participate one, it just aknowledges your right to own firearms for the purpose of forming one; i.e. no membership is implied or required to exercise it.

Output: Valid


Input: Consider Input: Criminals that do not obey gun control laws will be able to obtain guns and use them on the unarmed law-abiding citizens.

Output: Valid


Input: Consider Input: So we should take things/ rights away from people because there is a potential they could do criminal things with them?


Output: Valid