We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.
--------
Question: Sent1: Anybody else in American history able to lend credibility to your belief that the Second Amendment was all about gun control and how gun ownership was never intended to be an individual right?
 Sent2: The language and historical intent of the Second Amendment mandates recognition of the individual right to keep and bear firearms and other personal weapons.

Answer: Similar


Question: Sent1: We tell them what was meant when the law passed, but even these gun owners do not care what was meant, they only care what the law says!
 Sent2: Which passed the law requireing "smart guns", if they ever become available (right now they do not exist).

Answer: Not similar


Question: Sent1: The crime comes from using the gun (or any other weapon) to violate the rights of others.
 Sent2: However none of these exceptions would apply to a criminal obtaining a specific firearm through the black market or outright theft, and then going on a shooting spree where others are killed or otherwise maimed.

Answer:
Not similar