In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: threat and non-threat. Threat is a statement that someone will be hurt or harmed, especially if the person does not do something in particular.

[EX Q]: Comment: Trump Doctrine?  That must be a joke.  Trump is an imbecile who has made the goal of not learning anything, his life's work.  There's a reason that the Trump administration is a failed dung heap.  It's because the person at the top is comically unfit.
[EX A]: Non-threat

[EX Q]: Comment: """"""""Look at the futility coming from the hab organization that get smoked by Columbus. """""""""  Class statement.  What have you and Trump got in common?   Is it Sense or Cents....
[EX A]: Non-threat

[EX Q]: Comment: Unlike many commentators I'm OK with Bombardier being chosen to supply the vehicles; that's how national champions are created: by actually *buying* their products. (The US understands this deeply: the Buy-American provisions, DARPA grants and public procurement policies that consider US startups.) That said, "you don't sh*t where you eat", and Bombardier seriously messed up by delaying their Toronto streetcar deliveries (i.e. in their home market). The optics of the provincial/municipal government and Metrolinx doing nothing were politically unpalatable, so...here we are.
[EX A]:
Non-threat