We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Input: Consider Input: Sent1: You have just shown your position why we should use the death penalty, but i have not seen the solution for people who are making crime?
 Sent2: No, if it is already known that this person made the crime, the death penalty may be used.

Output: Not similar


Input: Consider Input: Sent1: The death penalty can be viewed as legalized murder, which is ironic considering that such a punishment is only imposed because of the cruelty of the crime - murder.
 Sent2: I think the death penalty is an archaic and obsolete form of punishment, even for the crime of murder.

Output: Not similar


Input: Consider Input: Sent1: I do feel that those who murder in cold blood would be more than deserving of the death penalty.
 Sent2: And no, I don't the death penalty is murder.


Output: Not similar