In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine the neutral choice based on your inference from the statement and your commonsense knowledge. The neutral choice is a sentence that neither agrees nor disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3', corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence. If sentence X agrees with sentence Y, one's correctness follows from the other one. If sentence X disagrees with sentence Y, they can not be correct at the same time.

Example Input: Statement: An article refutes the accepted wisdom that Klaus Fuchs and David Greenglass leaked the first atomic secrets to the Soviets. Choices: 1. Greenglass and Fuchs were not responsible for secrets being divulged to the Soviets. 2. There were secrets leaked to the Soviets. 3. The article proves that they were responsible for telling secrets.
Example Output: 1

Example Input: Statement: Magic to lift things instead of honest ropes that shrink and wood that swells. Choices: 1. Magic is the most honest way to lift things. 2. Magic is dishonest because it can only be used by politicians. 3. Ropes and wood are more host ways to lift things than magic.
Example Output: 2

Example Input: Statement: The curators have done a good job of separating any military justification for the decision from its tragic consequences for the civilian population. Choices: 1. The curators have taken care to consider the differing stands of the military and the people.  2. The curators have managed the disaster very well.  3. The curators have caused a public outcry by blaming the military for the people's suffering. 
Example Output:
1