In this task, You are given an amazon food product review and its summary. Your task is to Generate "True" if given review and its summary match, otherwise generate "False".

Q: Product has a shelf life of two years and was labeled as produced in December of 2009. Product leaked from seal in carton. 
 Summary: Be cautious

A: True
****
Q: I was anxious to try this, but upon the first sip it was apparent to me that this drink was not going to go well for me.  It has a very sharp/harsh citrus-y metallic flavor and combined with the overwhelming sweetness, the two seem to battle it out in my mouth for dominance.  After awhile it seemed like the drink was going down more like syrup more than a carbonated beverage.  The can is small at 8.3 oz (a regular sized pop can is 12 oz) and the cost of these little guys seem a little bit astronomical.  I also am a bit dubious of its attempts to seem like a healthy alternative to pop.  It still has loads of sugar in it.  So when they claim "no additional sugar" this may lead you to believe no sugar or low sugar... but it does in fact have 34 grams. 
 Summary: Very harsh, too-sweet flavor.

A: True
****
Q: According to an article on CNN.com on 8/5/11, the nutritional content of this brand does not live up to what is on the lable. "Researchers at ConsumerLab.com tested the sodium, potassium, magnesium, and sugar content of three leading brands of coconut water, and they found that only one, Zico Natural, contained the stated amount for all four ingredients.  The sugar and potassium content in the other two brands, Vita Coco and O.N.E., also matched the label. But the amounts of sodium and magnesium--two nutrients key to hydration--were as much as 82% and 35% lower, respectively, than the listed amount." 
 Summary: Nutritional content of this brand does not live up to what's on the label.

A:
True
****