We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gay Marriage) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gay marriage. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gay marriage.

Input: Consider Input: And that debate also settled on "No, BEING gay isn't wrong", thus the act of gay marriage for gay people should also be considered a net win for society, and in no occurrences a wrong thing.

Output: Valid


Input: Consider Input: That way we can keep the sanctity of marriage between a man and a woman, and gays can still have a "union" with other gays.

Output: Valid


Input: Consider Input: Someone in a homosexual relationship is not able to give anyone else those benefits unless he chooses someone completely outside of the relationships, someone arbitrary, who is not actually part of the family.


Output: Valid