In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine the neutral choice based on your inference from the statement and your commonsense knowledge. The neutral choice is a sentence that neither agrees nor disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3', corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence. If sentence X agrees with sentence Y, one's correctness follows from the other one. If sentence X disagrees with sentence Y, they can not be correct at the same time.
--------
Question: Statement: (Well, for Skadden it's not such a mystery, considering that Slate is part of the name of the D.C. law firm Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher &amp; Flom.) Choices: 1. Slate is part of a law office's name. 2. Slate is not related to the law firm it shares a name with. 3. Slate is just a law firm.

Answer: 2


Question: Statement: There's been the most awful row!  Choices: 1. There was the worst row ever. 2. There has been no commotion. 3. There was an awful row.

Answer: 1


Question: Statement: These Year 2000 conversion efforts are often conducted under severe time constraints that, without adequate management attention, could result in a weakening of controls over the integrity of data and programs and over the confidentiality of sensitive data. Choices: 1. The severe time constraints on the Year 2000 conversion efforts should have absolutely no effect on the confidentiality of sensitive data. 2. These conversion efforts need to be given more time in the future. 3. The severe time constraints on the Year 2000 conversion efforts could result in weaker control  over the integrity of the data.

Answer:
2