We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

[Q]: Sent1: If it has nothing to do with the death penalty, how could it have anything to do with lives saved by the death penalty in the first place?
 Sent2: If the same murderer had been given the death penalty, and never released in the first place, he would not be able to kill again.
[A]: Not similar


[Q]: Sent1: If murder is wrong than so is the death penalty.
 Sent2: Murder is murder and those who execute the death penalty are murderers as well.
[A]: Similar


[Q]: Sent1: Until then, I remain unmoved by their cries of "innocent people" being put to death.
 Sent2: "We know for a FACT that innocent people have been put to death already"- then give me their names.
[A]:
Similar