In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

[EX Q]: Comment: "It doesn't keep elections 'pure' it just drives the money into STUPID AREAS"

Well, that's a useful bunch of gibberish. It's not like there aren't elections all around the world with campaign finance laws that work quite well.

"You want to get good candidates get rid of every restriction BUT the REPORTING requirements."

Here's a better idea: leave every candidate with limited but equal financing -- so that candidates focus solely on explaining why their policy is superior to all others -- and every citizen, whether billionaire or hobo has but one equal voice.

It's "one man one vote" not "one dollar one vote."
[EX A]: Non-identity-attack

[EX Q]: Comment: Don't most gay guys like getting roughed up by another man?
[EX A]: Identity-attack

[EX Q]: Comment: I think we will get there. Nixon couldn't keep a lid on Watergate and he was much smarter and an infinitely better politician than Trump could ever hope to be. I think poor ol' Donny's goose is cooked.
[EX A]:
Non-identity-attack