The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the self-need strategy, otherwise output No. self-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to create a personal need for an item in the negotiation, such as by pointing out that the participant sweats a lot to show preference towards water packages.

Input: Consider Input: Context: 'Food is actually my first priority but since it seems to be first priority for us both I thought we could split that. Water doesn't seem to be a priority for you so thought I could take that' 'My first priority is actually firewood.  Food is my second.  🙂' 'Okay so would 2 firewood for you and 1 for me work, and 2 food for me and 1 for you?'
Utterance: 'I can definitely agree to that.  What was your second preference?  Water was my third.'

Output: No


Input: Consider Input: Context: 'That's fair, but I have wiggle room on the water, how about I take two food, two firewood and you take 3 water, 1 food, 1 firewood?' 'Is there anyway you will go with that I get two firewood? I need food the most but since you get most of that can I get most of the firewood? So 1 food, 2 firewood, and 2 water for me?' 'You drive a hard bargain. I could really use that firewood. It's going to get cold tonight and these sleeping bags are not worth the price I paid ;)'
Utterance: 'Haha, I know but I am in the same situation! ☹️ and since I am getting less food I feel like it is fair I get on more firewood since I truly need that 🙂'

Output: No


Input: Consider Input: Context: 'Well, there has to be an item that you need the most. If you tell me what you need the most, we can try to make a deal around it.' 'Oh I see, its going to be THAT kind of negotiation 🙂  Let's just look at it this way.. I'm with a couple other Floridians so we're not really too worried about firewood as we prefer it cooler, anyway.. and we know the lake is nearby that's stocked with trout for eating if necessary (and of course some fresh water's there, too) - so.. I can tell you that I could go totally without Firewood if I needed to.. I'd rather not, but I could.' 'Do you prefer food or water more?'
Utterance: 'Since the lake is nearby enough, I think we'd be more interested in ensuring there's enough food for my people, I think 🙂'


Output: Yes