In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Input: Consider Input: Comment: Fake news!! Impossible!!  All pollution tastes yummy on my damn Cheerios!!!  I'm a Republican!!! Pollution is DELICIOUS!!!!!!  ;)

Output: Obscene


Input: Consider Input: Comment: and another ignorant one, trump is not the usual he is a leader who knows how to bargain from strength, not being sheep like obama and justin

Output: Non-obscene


Input: Consider Input: Comment: Good catch, Bernie'sFriend, re GT's "shortcut to the U.S. Senate" accusation!  Wow, indeed.  He made me laugh out loud, as he did with his little snit about Ms. Stock's being "a lawyer all her life" -- as if Murkowki weren't also a lawyer!  OMG, at least Lt. Colonel Stock knows what it is to have to work for a living, to work for our military, to work her way up from the bottom (from poverty & homelessness) to EARN her success, so very unlike Murkowski.

But GT's sleazy imagery in his fact-free slur is disgusting -- his sick fantasy about Ms. Stock becoming some old male Democrats "toygirl...wagging her tail" in the U.S. Senate.  Yuck....  So I've copied & highlighted his rant above, plus a few of his bigoted comments on another subject, so I can show them to some "undecided" elder acquaintances (who dislike sexism & racism) to show them the kind of person that Murkowski attracts....


Output: Non-obscene