Given a document, an entity and its sentiment towards the entity, verify if it is the correct sentiment towards the entity. Answer should be yes or no. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Pope Francis Letter is Negative . Well  it’s now happened.  The great scandal of the modern Catholic Church  —  its  tolerance for clergy who abuse children  and  its  laxity when dealing with bishops who themselves tolerated or enabled priest-abusers — now touches directly on  the pope himself .
 It ’s worth laying out the timeline clearly. In 2015  Pope Francis appointed Juan Barros Madrid to the bishopric of Osorno  Chile. The appointment was met with local protests  among Catholics and non-Catholics who believed that Barros was implicated in the crimes of child sexual abuse committed by his friend Father Fernando Karadima  a prominent Chilean churchman who habitually kissed and fondled boys. In the days after the installation of Barros at Osono  Pope Francis told an archbishop that there was “no objective reason at all” to oppose the appointment. The Vatican’s own department governing these matters  the Congregation for Bishops  released a statement saying they had “carefully examined the prelate’s candidature and did not find objective reasons to preclude the appointment.”
In the months following the appointment   Pope Francis  became extremely dismissive of complaints. “Osorno suffers  yes  for silliness ”  the pope  said of the outrage in the media. “Think with your head  and do not be carried away by the noses of the leftists  who are the ones who put this thing together ” he added.
A few weeks ago   Pope Francis ’s visit to Chile was marked by protests  and  the pope  continued  his  extremely brusque dismissal. “The day I see proof against Bishop Barros  then I will talk ” the pontiff said. “There is not a single piece of evidence against  him . It is all slander. Is that clear?”  Francis  said that no victims had come forward to  him . It was apparently this statement that caused Cardinal Sean O’Malley of Boston to scramble down to Chile and meet with the pope. After O’Malley’s intervention  presumably  the pope issued a half-apology  but repeated that the accusations against Barros were “slander” before adding  “I’m convinced he’s innocent.”
And now the news drops. In the time between the pope’s appointment of Barros and his commentary about protesters being carried away by leftists  members of the Vatican’s own Commission for the Protection of Minors gathered to discuss the appointment. They had a representative hand-deliver a letter to Pope Francis  from Carlos Cruz. The letter alleged  in lurid detail  that Barros had personally witnessed the abuse of Cruz at Karadima’s hands. Members of the commission photographed the hand-off of the letter to  the pope   to reassure Cruz that they were doing everything possible to make his cry for justice heard.
The facts as we know them leave us with a few interpretations. 1)  Pope Francis  simply never read the letter  ignoring this extraordinary intervention by the Vatican’s own commission on a matter of public controversy for  his  pontificate. 2)  Francis  read the letter but forgot about it  reverting to  his  original understanding of the case. 3)  Francis  read the letter  but stuck to  his  decision for Barros  committing unintentional or intentional deceptions about the state of  his  knowledge of the accusations. 4)  He  read the letter  but either doubted the accusations in it  or at least found them so unimpressive that  he  did not decide to follow up on them.
The first explanation would mean that  Francis  was culpably ignorant. The second that  he  may lack the mental or moral faculties to competently govern the Catholic Church. The third that  he  is too stubborn or vain to change course in the face of evidence. And the last that  he  has little trust or faith in the Commission on the Protection of Minors to pass on credible counsel to  him . Perhaps more reporting or disclosure will change our understanding  but none of these are satisfactory.
no

Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Papadopoulos is Negative . In an email   Papadopoulos  claimed that it was top members of Trumpâs campaign team that agreed to a pre-election meeting with representatives of Russian President Vladimir Putin.
According to a Bloomberg report  the email was disclosed in an FBI affidavit  supporting criminal charges against  Papadopoulos . It is not included in the court documents that detail his guilty plea and cooperation with Robert Muellerâs team.
The message  if true  would bolster claims that Trumpâs campaign attempted to collude with Russian interests. But itâs unclear whether  Papadopoulos   who pleaded guilty to lying to the Federal Bureau of Investigation  was merely boasting when  he  sent the July 14  2016  email to a Kremlin-linked contact. Thereâs also no indication such a meeting ever occurred.
Writing to the Russian contact a week before the Republican National Convention   Papadopoulos  proposed a meeting for August or September in the U.K. that would include âmy national chairman and maybe one other foreign policy adviserâ and members of Putinâs office and Russiaâs foreign ministry. âIt has been approved by our side â  Papadopoulos  wrote.
At the time of the email  Paul Manafort was the campaign chairman. It was reported earlier that Sam Clovis  Trumpâs current pick to lead the USDA  was  Papadopoulos â campaign supervisor  at that time  and that heâd been encouraging of his efforts to reach out to Russian officials.
 Papadopoulos  developed three separate contacts that  he  hoped would help dig up dirt on Hillary Clinton  and  he  kept people within the campaign in the loop.
The communications  by Skype  Facebook  text and email  show the electronic trail the government is following to verify how the campaign handled Russian contacts. One of those people  identified in court documents as Foreign Contact 2  is Ivan Timofeev  Russian foreign ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova said Tuesday. He works for the Moscow-based Russian International Affairs Council  a Kremlin-linked research group  and isnât a foreign ministry employee  despite  Papadopoulos âs assertion  she said.
Timofeev has so far refused to speak with anyone about the contacts he had with  Papadopoulos   except to say he felt  Papadopoulos  was an âenthusiast  with little experience.â
no

Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity John Stamos is Neutral . “Fuller House”  star  John Stamos  is about to have a full house of  his  own.  Stamos   who recently announced  his  engagement to model/actress  Caitlin McHugh  shared the news with People Magazine that the two are expecting their first child together.
“The look on  John ’s face when I told  him  we were pregnant was priceless ” said McHugh. “It was the look of  a man who has wanted a family of his own but wasn’t sure it was going to happen for him . Now it is!”
Though  Stamos  will be a first time dad in real life  the actor is no stranger to fatherhood duties after years of playing Uncle Jesse on “Full House” and acting as a father to the show’s twins  Nikki and Alex. Needless to say   Stamos  has had  his  fair share of dad experience.
“I’ll be a fun dad. I’ve been practicing for a long time ”  he  says  joking  “I’ve done every schtick you can do with a baby on TV … all the bits and jokes and diaper gags. I’ll probably just do all that stuff.”

no