In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

Q: Sentence: The police arrested all of the gang members. They were trying to stop the drug trade in the neighborhood.
 Reason: The 'They' refers to the police because the alleged gang members were arrested. The 'They' also referred to the neighborhood. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

A: Wrong
****
Q: Sentence: I put the cake away in the refrigerator. It has a lot of butter in it.
 Reason: The 'It' refers to the cake because butter is an ingredient of cakes. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

A: Correct
****
Q: Sentence: The fish ate the worm. It was tasty.
 Reason: The 'It' refers to the worm because The fish was the one eating so it must be hungry. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

A:
Wrong
****