In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: threat and non-threat. Threat is a statement that someone will be hurt or harmed, especially if the person does not do something in particular.

Example Input: Comment: The saddest decision i've ever read.  For 40 years the LGBTQ community work hard with the Police force (s), to get them involved in Pride events,.  And the spineless Pride Committee who have sat back and benefitted from the work of many police and members of the gay community to ensure that the Police Force has their place in Pride events.  Gone... thanks to the lack of backbone of the committee who are being held hostage by one group to the detriment of another group .  Community needs to push back on the Pride Committee to change this stupid decision.  As a gay person , very ashamed about this decision.
Example Output: Non-threat

Example Input: Comment: The Canadians who responded to this poll obviously have limited horizons and are locked in the antiquated nation state paradigm.  Our illustrious, omniscient PM has leap frogged light years ahead of us and, together with a few of his equally narcissistic, delusional friends (such as Bono), sees himself as a leader of the nationless, borderless new world order.

He must find it so tiresome to have to deal with our naive lack of understanding of these things.
Example Output: Non-threat

Example Input: Comment: Many comments here are, to me, very simplistic, based on a Trumpian idiot-ology, that sees things only in black and white. Either it's government intervention/control/command of the economy or it's let the private sector do it all, pure capitalism. This is not based on any evidence from anywhere in the world.

As the article says, "Historically, every country from Israel to the U.S. to China has always been led by public investments which directly create a new landscape. The business community reacts, gets interested. And then if you add some tax breaks, that will increase the marginal spending but it won’t make them do what they wouldn’t have done anyway. So that’s [why we need] additionality, getting firms to do what they would not have done anyway. In countries like Canada, there is too much reliance on indirect tax breaks that just make the companies richer. The point of policy is not to increase profits, it’s to increase investments."

This argument is grounded in the real world.
Example Output:
Non-threat