In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence can be inferred from the statement. Incorrect choices change the meaning in important ways or have details that are not mentioned in the statement. Indicate your answer as 1,2, or 3 corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.

[EX Q]: Statement: Another refreshing feature of Goodman's storytelling is that, unlike other members of fundamentalist sects one might find in novels, her characters don't chafe at their restrictions, or not too much. Choices:  1. Goodman's characters failing to question their restrictions is frustrating to read. 2. The fact that Goodman's characters in fundamental sects don't generally feel too restricted by the rules of their sects is a unique aspect of Goodman's storytelling. 3. The common novel story line that has members of fundamentalist sects yearning for freedom has become overused and stale.
[EX A]: 2

[EX Q]: Statement: It shone now like a tiny bit of white-hot metal; but the older man touched it, and it snuggled down into Dave's chest, dimming its glow and somehow purring. Choices:  1. The older man was unable to touch it. 2. Dave was immune to it's heat. 3. The tiny metal snuggled into Dave's chest.
[EX A]: 3

[EX Q]: Statement: Two riders escorted at hardly more than a fast walk a buckboard in which were two other men. Choices:  1. The buckboard escorted by the riders was empty. 2. Two men on horseback slowly lead the carriage with the two other men in it. 3. The two French soldiers escorted the prisoners riding in the carriage.
[EX A]:
2