We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

Therefore nobody should have access to firearms trace data for civil actions, as they pose absolutely no relevance of any sort to fighting crime, and are designed only for bankrupting firearms companies.
Valid

I wouldn't mind it as much if there was a law that required some level of training for guns to be purchased, so we know that whoever buys these will no how to defend themselves.
Valid

If my kid encounters a gun while playing at another's home I'll get involved in gun safety education.

Valid