We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Input: Consider Input: Eyewitnesses are frequently unreliable, DNA evidence has been overturned, and even personal confessions are unreliable: several people confessed to being the Yorkshire Ripper here in the UK who were found to have nothing to do with it.

Output: Valid


Input: Consider Input: So what does he have to do with a debate like this about murderers and the death penalty?

Output: Valid


Input: Consider Input: I'm fairly certain that no state has ever made persons who committed their crime at, say, 8-9 years old eligible for the death penalty.


Output: Valid