In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

Q: Sentence: The large ball crashed right through the table because it was made of styrofoam.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the table because A ball isn't going to crash through a table if it was the one made out of Styrofoam as oppose to the ball being the one. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

A: Correct
****
Q: Sentence: I used an old rag to clean the knife, and then I put it in the drawer.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the knife because I had to use the scissors to shave off the skin that was left behind after the knife was sharp. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

A: Wrong
****
Q: Sentence: I can't cut that tree down with that axe; it is too small.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the axe because The tree is too thick for the axe. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

A:
Wrong
****