The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the no-need strategy, otherwise output No. no-need is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used when a participant points out that they do not need an item based on personal context such as suggesting that they have ample water to spare. no-need can directly benefit the opponent since it implies that the item is up for grabs.

[Q]: Context: 'What if I get 2 food packages and 1 water package....and you would get 1 food package and 2 waters?' 'I think we will need more extra food than that.  How about the reverse, I get 2 food and 1 water and you get 1 food and 2 water.' 'I could do that if I could then get 2 packages of wood as well because it's been bitterly cold this time of year at night in the Alleghenies.'
Utterance: 'That sounds fair.  So I would get 2 food, 1 water, and 1 firewood.'
[A]: No


[Q]: Context: 'Okay, let's do that, and then split the food. Since there are only 3, do you want to flip a coin to see who gets 2 of those?' 'That sounds fair, how much food do you feel you need? ' 'I would prefer 2 because it's really easy to underestimate how much I could need.'
Utterance: 'That's fine, I'll take 1. I think I have enough with what was originally given. '
[A]: Yes


[Q]: Context: 'Why do you need so much firewood?🙂' 'My camping expedition is in the far reaches of the north, away from civilization. I've already lost three fingers to frostbite, and I can ill afford to lose another. In short, I need the firewood - for fire. And warmth.' 'Sorry to hear about your problems. Are you going to Canada this time?'
Utterance: 'Farther. I'm going so far north that we'll be passing over the north pole and keep going into Siberia.'
[A]:
No