The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the self-need strategy, otherwise output No. self-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to create a personal need for an item in the negotiation, such as by pointing out that the participant sweats a lot to show preference towards water packages.

Q: Context: 'What do you propose?' 'I really need food too, but I am willing to deal and let my kids go hungry I guess ☹️ I propose I get one food, 3 firewood and 1 water.  ' 'Will you please give me one firewood? I may run out of what i have. Just one.'
Utterance: 'I think I will need all the firewood since you are taking 2 foods. I will need to hunt and cook food from the land meaning I need my fire going all the time.'

A: Yes
****
Q: Context: 'I would give you all of the additional food if you gave me all of the additional water. ' 'That sounds like a deal' 'Shall we divide the firewood two to one? '
Utterance: 'sure as long as I am getting two wood.   It gets very cold at night where I go camping'

A: Yes
****
Q: Context: 'I would be open to that if you could give me three packages of water 🙂' 'Hmmm...I'm pretty muddy due to clumsiness, so I may need one extra. I could give you two waters and all of the firewood. What do you think? 🙂' 'So are you suggesting that I would get 2 waters, 3 firewood, and no food?'
Utterance: 'Right! Well, beyond the food you already have. '

A:
No
****