Given a document and an entity the task is to select the author's sentiment towards the entity. Sentiments can be Positive, Neutral and Negative. Select Positive if the article expresses a positive view towards the given entity or praises its quality or skills. Select Neutral if the document expresses no clear view towards the entity or has equal amounts of positive and negative statements or expressing some fact/quote by someone else. Select Negative if the article expresses a negative view towards like harsh remarks, criticizing entities action/decision etc. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

Q: What is the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Yuriko Koike ? “If I use a golf course metaphor  right now  I believe we have right (wing parties) and left (wing parties) and nothing in between. So we will present ourselves as the fairway  the very centre of the way ”  Koike  told a policy debate by major party leaders.
The outlook for the election is unclear but some analysts say  Koike ’s party may be losing steam because it had too little time to prepare for the snap poll. Her decision not to run for a lower house seat herself could also deter voters  they said.
 Koike  said  her  party’s policies aim to bring a new idea such as basic income and will be closer to consumers.
“The idea of basic income is still experimental but we think this is something we should consider in the future ”  she  said.
But  Koike  declined to reveal who would lead a government should  her  party  formed only about two weeks ago by  her  supporters and some opposition lawmakers  be in a position to form one.

A: Neutral
****
Q: What is the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Rand Paul ? Kentucky Senator Rand Paul  said on Sunday that  he âs not sure if President Trump will seek re-election at this time.
Talking to MSNBCâs Kasie Hunt on Sunday   Paul  was asked if a 2020 Republican primary was on the horizon.  Paul  said âno one can stop primaries from happening and there could well be a primary that happens â but added that a Trump re-election attempts would have to be signaled for first.
Thing is   Paul  isnât sure â at least at the time â whether or not Trump is wanting a second term.
âBefore you even get to that  you need to know  is President Trump running for reelection? I think you wonât know that until you get into sort of â second  third year of his presidency â said  Paul .
 Paul  said  he  doesnât seem  himself  supporting anyone else but Trump at this time  noting that Trump has repealed regulations for the first time in 20 years  has a very conservative cabinet  and may get a couple more Supreme Court appointees out of  his  run.
âSo I see the glass as half full. Doesnât mean I agree with  him  on everything â  Paul  said.
 Paul  said that one issue would tempt  Paul  away from Trump  should another candidate rise against  him .
âYou know  there would be people that â if we could end the Afghan war  thatâs who I would support. But I donât think thatâs going to be an alternative to President Trump â said  Paul .

A: Neutral
****
Q: What is the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Adam Jonas ? Morgan Stanley analyst Adam Jonas  thinks Ferrari needs to go electric to survive.
 Morgan Stanley auto analyst Adam Jonas  is to be commended for pushing an investment thesis on the future of mobility so out-there that it's difficult for the rest of Wall Street to keep up.
But sometimes  Jonas  pushes too far  as  he  did on Thursday in a research note about Ferrari and the prospects for the exotic Italian automaker switching from gas engines  with their succulent Ferrari scream  to all-electric powertrains.
 Jonas  raises a thornier conundrum:
 Jonas  then makes a second classic error when looking at Ferrari  comparing it to the Tesla Model S in terms of acceleration.
 Jonas  thinks  he 's being stoutly contrarian in arguing that Ferrari must be seriously thinking about going electric  despite an all-electric future being pretty speculative at this point (hardly beside the point  with a $100 price target of Ferrari and an "Overweight" rating â the stock is now trading at $114 â Jonas appears to be building a bear case).
What  Jonas  and all of Wall Street fails to understand is that Ferrari is art  at many levels. And art doesn't care to survive just so investors can make money no matter what happens.

A:
Neutral
****