We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

Q: Rather it is more beneficial to engage others in a discussion in their own threads to discuss matters on what would be regarded as "their home turf."

A: Invalid
****
Q: Would you really want a public with an armed force of unknown size, strength, mobilty, location, organizational structure and intention anywhere in your country?

A: Valid
****
Q: So, no, I wouldn't say there was any "gun control" as you (Galileo) tried to pass off as early gun control laws.

A:
Valid
****