We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gay Marriage) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gay marriage. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gay marriage.
--------
Question: There are no actual legal stipulations regarding HIV patients having sex, particularily with non-HIV people, which may as well be considered murder.

Answer: Invalid


Question: But one who teaches that homosexuality is wrong, yet who sees violence against homosexuals and also states that we should not harm them cannot be blamed for violence.

Answer: Valid


Question: That could be extended even to say that I don't think promoting specifically male/female monogamy is a good thing because it implies that same-sex monogamy is not a good thing.

Answer:
Valid