In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

[EX Q]: Comment: Denying that  a Creator actually created the universe  is akin to denying that anyone 'created'  a housing development or a piece of art. If I said the housing development just appeared out of nowhere you'd say I was crazy and you would be right. Yet the  belief that the entire universe had no designer, no builder and no intelligence behind it and it just  appeared is accepted, with a straight face,  as a fact. Just because we don't know how God did something  doesn't mean He didn't do it.  That kind of reasoning is absurd and not at all 'scientific'.
[EX A]: Non-obscene

[EX Q]: Comment: This is why old media G&M is dying. Anyone with a few brain cells can see this is a Re/Max propaganda dressed up as news. In other words, this is fake news.

More honest headline: "Bubble to grow more toxic in 2017 if real estate shills get their wish."
[EX A]: Non-obscene

[EX Q]: Comment: I don't  wonder why  the backlash, the backlash is because we hit s critical mass of ignorance in America.  Between gerrymandering,  playing lip service to religious extremist, and racist and people like you that are ideologues, the minority won.
[EX A]:
Non-obscene