We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Q: Sent1: Now if you want gun control laws that limit or ban the right to bear arms you are a gun haters.
 Sent2: You're right that gun control isn't about guns, however, but 'control' is a secondary matter, a means to an end.

A: Not similar
****
Q: Sent1: Now tell me, how is gun control going to stop people from making their own?
 Sent2: Gun control should be left to the person holding the gun.

A: Not similar
****
Q: Sent1: Finally it mentions that Swiss "gun control" is not the reason for the low crime rates and, granted, it also mentions that this system is not proof that more guns means less crime.
 Sent2: So an article that is entitled "Gun control doesn't reduce crime, violence, say studies" is not claiming that gun control is ineffective?

A:
Not similar
****