In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

Q: Sentence: Paul tried to call George on the phone, but he wasn't available.
 Reason: The 'he' refers to george because George was likely the one not reachable. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

A: Correct
****
Q: Sentence: Sam tried to paint a picture of shepherds with sheep, but they ended up looking more like dogs.
 Reason: The 'they' refers to the sheep because dogs likely to the shepherds. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

A: Correct
****
Q: Sentence: Madonna fired her trainer because she slept with her boyfriend.
 Reason: The 'she' refers to the trainer because he has been accused of having sex with her, as well as her boyfriend, who is also named. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

A:
Wrong
****