Given a document, an entity and its sentiment towards the entity, verify if it is the correct sentiment towards the entity. Answer should be yes or no. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

Example Input: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Rodrigo Duterte is Negative . Outspoken Philippines President Rodrigo Duterte added to his legendary list of outrageous claims Thursday when he bragged about stabbing a person to death when he was 16 years old -- and  Duterte  raised even more eyebrows when he reportedly later called former President Barack Obama "so black and arrogant."
In a defiant speech hitting back at critics of his deadly drug crackdown   Duterte  said  he  would go into jails and have “rumbles here  rumbles there.”
“At the age of 16  I already killed someone. A real person  a rumble  a stabbing ”  Duterte  said during a summit in the Vietnamese city of Danang  according to the BBC. “I was just 16 years old. It was just over a look. How much more now that I am president.”
A spokesman for  Duterte  said the remarks had been made “in jest.”
 Duterte  also hit Obama  slamming  his  former U.S. counterpart for criticizing the Philippines drug war.
“These white people  those from [the European Union]  the ignorant Americans  pretending to be  this Obama ”  Duterte  said  according to The Philippine Star. “You are so black and arrogant. [He] reprimanded me. Why you reprimand me? I’m the president of a country.”
Since  Duterte  took office 16 months ago  police said more than 3 960 people have been killed in the war on drugs. Another 2 290 people have been murdered in drug-related crimes  the government said.
Last year   Duterte  said  he  would be “happy to slaughter” millions of drug addicts and that  he  even fatally shot criminals while  he  was mayor of the southern city of Davao to set an example for police.
Thursday was not even the first time  he  has mentioned stabbing and killing someone while a teenager. In 2015   he  told the Philippines edition of Esquire magazine that during a “tumultuous fight in the beach” when  he  was 17  “maybe I stabbed somebody to death.”
It’s unclear if  he  was referring to the same incident in Thursday’s speech.
Example Output: no

Example Input: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Steve Bannon is Neutral . The attempts to curtail testimony to congressional investigators became clear this week when  former White House chief strategist Steve Bannon  appeared before the House Intelligence Committee and infuriated both sides of the aisle by refusing to answer questions about  his  work during the presidential transition and in the White House.
At some points during  Bannon 's six hours of closed-door testimony   his  attorney took breaks to confer via telephone with the White House counsel's office to clarify what questions could be answered and came back with the same guidance:  Bannon  could not discuss any activities related to the transition or  his  tenure in the White House.
 Bannon 's team negotiated ground rules with the White House counsel's office the week prior to his appearance before the House Intelligence Committee  according to a source familiar with the situation.
The President's personal legal team was aware of discussions between the White House counsel's office and  Bannon 's lawyer about protecting a possible privilege claim. But it wasn't their decision  according to a person familiar with the discussions. The protection of the privilege is a matter for the White House  not the President's legal team  because it relates to the office.
Before the hearing   Bannon 's lawyer informed a staff member of Rep. Devin Nunes  the California Republican who chairs the House Intelligence Committee  that  Bannon  planned to claim executive privilege on topics beyond the presidential campaign  a source said.
But that information was apparently tightly held. "It caught me personally by surprise" that  Bannon  asserted executive privilege  said Rep. Mike Conaway  the Texas Republican leading the committee's Russia investigation.
South Carolina Rep. Trey Gowdy and Florida Rep. Tom Rooney  the other two Republicans leading the Russia probe along with Conaway  also said they weren't aware of any agreement between the White House and committee staff about the scope of  Bannon 's testimony.
"They wouldn't do that because I'd ask what I think is relevant to ask  and if you've got a legal privilege you can assert it " Gowdy said  adding that  Bannon  was in a "legally indefensible position."
As it became clear on Tuesday that  Bannon  was refusing to answer questions  the committee served  him  with a subpoena to compel  him  to divulge additional information.
But the scope of what  Bannon  was claiming was privileged shocked members from both parties.
" His  version of executive privilege is it covers the transition  the time  he  was at the White House and covers time forever " Gowdy told Fox News Wednesday. "That is no one's definition of executive privilege."
Lawmakers were also offended that  Bannon  had already divulged details about some of  his  post-campaign activities in Michael Wolff's explosive book "Fire and Fury " but then refused to discuss those events with the committee.  Bannon 's attorney also informed members that he would  in fact  answer those questions when he meets with special counsel Robert Mueller's team because executive privilege doesn't apply to Mueller's investigation.
Democrats charge that  Bannon 's appearance before the House committee marks the broadest attempt so far at using privilege to shield events that occurred from the moment Trump was elected.
Republicans haven't ruled out the possibility of holding  Bannon  in contempt  but at least one GOP member -- Gowdy -- suggested it was unlikely.
House Speaker Paul Ryan downplayed the issue of whether witnesses like  Bannon  might be abusing the bounds of executive privilege.
Still   Bannon 's stonewalling sparked a sharp warning from Conaway -- the Republican leading the House Russia probe -- to White House aides who might follow the Bannon model: "We're going to insist on getting questions we need to answer our report."
Example Output: yes

Example Input: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity LeBron James is Neutral . A viral image shows LeBron James wearing a T-shirt that reads , "We march , y’ all mad . 
The photo was from warmups for James ' Dec. 8 , 2014 , game in Brooklyn . 
A viral image of National Basketball Association superstar LeBron James wearing a T-shirt about racial inequity gained lots of traction on social media , but the wording has been digitally replaced . 
PolitiFact first saw an image of James wearing the shirt on Oct. 9 , 2017 , on the Facebook page of Occupy Democrats , but the photo has spread all over the Internet . 
We have to be better for one another ," James said in 2014 . 
More recently , James chided President Donald Trump , who lashed out at the Golden State Warriors ' Stephen Curry for refusing to visit the White House with his championship team . 
James called Trump a "bum "on Twitter and later added that Trump "does n't understand the power that he has" as president . 
The older photo of James has been altered to make it look like he was wearing something he was n't . 
James was n't wearing that shirt in that photo -LRB- although you can buy it from scads of online retailers -RRB- .
Example Output:
yes