The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the small-talk strategy, otherwise output No. small-talk is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used for discussing topics apart from the negotiation, in an attempt to build a rapport with the opponent. For example, discussing how the opponent is doing during the pandemic or sharing excitement for the camping trip.

[Q]: Context: 'Well I really need the firewood because I have small kids with me and it would be hard for me to get some free time to get the firewood, but I would be willing to give you 2 firewood since I get two waters.  What are your thoughts about the food?' 'Okay what about ! firewood and 1 and half water. I don't want to run low on supplies so soon. It will be so bad for me. You can keep your firewood because of the kids.' 'We can't split the water in halves, so we gotta choose.  I need the food packages because I forgot to pack any food and I can't fish.  How about I get 2 water, 1 firewood, and 2 food?  Can we agree on that?'
Utterance: 'No problem.'
[A]: No


[Q]: Context: 'n' 'Hello there I was just thinking of the upcoming camping trip.' 'I'm sorry about that, accidentally hit that send button lol! I was thinking about it as well. I'm pretty excited. How about you?'
Utterance: 'I was just thinking about the logistics and how to prioritize the various items.'
[A]: Yes


[Q]: Context: 'I would do this instead: 3 firewood, 1 water and 2 food.' 'That's not going to be a fair offer, you'll need to do better than that or I don't think we can come to an agreement' '3 firewood, 1 water, 0 food'
Utterance: 'so I'll get 2 water, 3 food and 0 firewood?'
[A]:
No