The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.

[EX Q]: Context: 'Me too!! Though it's over 100 degrees these days. 😡' 'Well hopefully it will be cooler up in the mountains. What supplies are you in need of?' 'I am a big eater. I tend to eat a lot throughout the day. You? 🙂'
Utterance: 'Ha I get that! I'll need that too, but mostly water because my family wants to do a lot of hikes.'
[EX A]: Yes

[EX Q]: Context: 'Yes please ..! My son has respiratory problems I'll definitely need that 😡😡😡' 'If you really need water, then can I have 2 firewood and 3 food then?' 'No I really need food also ...at least I will take 3 food and 2 water and you can take remaining'
Utterance: 'I'll let you take 3 food and 1 water, and I will take the rest.'
[EX A]: No

[EX Q]: Context: 'Would it be okay if I was to get 3 food packages, and spare you 3 water packages?' 'That would be great 🙂. Would you be willing to take 1 firewood while I take 2?' 'I think that works, I am definitely down for that'
Utterance: 'That is fantastic. '
[EX A]:
No