The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the self-need strategy, otherwise output No. self-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to create a personal need for an item in the negotiation, such as by pointing out that the participant sweats a lot to show preference towards water packages.

Context: 'Firewood is not overly interesting to me, but water is somewhat enticing.' 'Ok, great - I can give you all of my waters in exchange for a majority of the food and half of firewood' 'Half of firewood? There are 3 so one of us has to get more. I would need more of that. '
Utterance: 'Yep, I know there's three and no way to split evenly lol - can you give me a justifiable reason as to why you deserve more over me? Please convince me.'
No

Context: 'Hey there!' 'Hi! How are you?! You excited for your camping trip??! I sure am ready to go on mine!'
Utterance: 'I am very excited, I'm actually going camping in a week. I drink a lot of water so it's important that I bring a lot. What about you?'
Yes

Context: '🙂v it sound's like we're on the right track! I'll gladly take 2 Food. How would you feel about taking all of the Water, while I take all of the Firewood?' 'Not really liking that , but I'd be willing to split the water with you if I could take 2 of those 🙂' 'OK, you take 2 of the Water, and I take 1. That just leaves the Firewood. How about 2 for me and 1 for you?'
Utterance: 'That sounds like what I had in mind to do , but let me think a bit more ok ?'

No