Categorize the comment on the basis of obscenity. If the comment is obscene output Yes, otherwise output No.

Ex Input:
so where s your proof? its easy for shit talkers like you to acuse when hes not here to defend himself. id like to take a peek into your closet jim.

Ex Output:
Yes


Ex Input:
Bill, again, you make good points, it's just that, damn, I'd much rather be grateful for what I've got than blaming people who have less for their poor choices. If it were just poor choices, and not some luck of geography, resources, and history, then we'd end up sneering at all the countries in the world except, possibly, maybe who, China? Japan? UK, Germany, and who else? "The poor are poor because of choices they made" is a tough world view. I hope for your sake that karma is just a myth. 

So I wasn't going to respond, since most of what you say is hard to argue, but that last part, I can't resist ... let's see, why would any government resist such a wall? How strange of Mexico to object, right? Proves their bad intentions. And with how successful walls have been everywhere else (China, Berlin, for example), how odd that Mexicans should have doubts.

Ex Output:
Yes


Ex Input:
Silly, it is because you do not have science behind the big wind in your sails. So if you have both a penis and vagina is your choice a "you" pick? Did you know that if God created humans he made a lot of humans with some major differences in designs. Check out the Vrolik Medical Museum in Amsterdam, they have an extensive collection of how God played around with his human design and should point out to humans that all humans are not created equal that there is no cutter design that God uses in his works. So having a set of genitals that does not match to the sex that you feel you are is by no means out of God's creative genius. For the sort of folks who are not deeply religious substitute "nature" for "God".

Ex Output:

Yes