Given a document and an entity the task is to select the author's sentiment towards the entity. Sentiments can be Positive, Neutral and Negative. Select Positive if the article expresses a positive view towards the given entity or praises its quality or skills. Select Neutral if the document expresses no clear view towards the entity or has equal amounts of positive and negative statements or expressing some fact/quote by someone else. Select Negative if the article expresses a negative view towards like harsh remarks, criticizing entities action/decision etc. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

What is the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Tonya Harding ? A quirky little Brooklyn museum focused on the saga of Tonya Harding and Nancy Kerrigan has won the “gold” that eluded the Winter Games hopefuls — as it has grown so popular in recent weeks that it has been forced to move into an Olympic-sized new space.
The pair debuted the gallery after watching ESPN’s 2014 “30 for 30” documentary “The Price of Gold” — which chronicles the clash between Kerrigan  sweetheart of the skating scene  and  Harding    her  troubled  working-class rival.
 Harding  became a tabloid fixture when  her  ex-husband hired someone to bash in Kerrigan’s right knee ahead of the 1994 US Figure Skating Championships.
Kerrigan recovered in time to compete while  Harding   despite not being charged with a crime  saw  her  career and reputation destroyed.
“What we both ended up taking from [the documentary] was this shock that there hasn’t already been a movie made showing what  Tonya Harding  had to go through. This was the first time we were seeing it and we thought  well   she ’s still alive. It’s time for people to rethink this ” said Harkins.
“ Tonya  said  she ’s heard of [the museum]   she  thinks it’s cool  but  she ’s not coming  which is totally fine ” Harkins said. “And then somebody from Nancy’s agency came and said they thought it was absurd but fun.”
Positive

What is the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Chris Christie Trump ? Donald Trump and  Chris Christie  campaign in 2016. (Photo: John Minchillo  AP)
I recall  Chris Christie’s  first interview with our editorial board after he won the 2009 election. We asked what had changed in his life now that he was governor of New Jersey.
More:  Chris Christie  polishes  his  Trump brand as the swamp beckons
More:  Chris Christie  on the beach: New Jersey had a bad day  why should he suffer?
The governor’s fight against opioid abuse won him national praise. But the standing ovation really should go to the Christie who pushed for drug courts  treatment over incarceration and the near elimination of cash bail. No other governor could have done so much to right the scales of justice for minorities and low-income defendants. None of this is sexy to voters in national primaries  which makes these initiatives so much more important in judging all that was  Christie . He was capable of being a great leader.
Then came Superstorm Sandy— the event that made  Christie  a national figure even as it pretty much set in motion everything that destroyed him. It fed his ego. The national attention he received in his blue fleece telling someone to get off the beach  the bombast that was akin to a happy King Lear  not howling at the wind  but pushing the wind back. He seemed invincible.
After Sandy  Christie was a rising Republican star. Everything he did was now seen through a rosy prism. He was the Republican governor of a blue state getting things done. To be clear: New Jersey is neither blue nor red. It’s madras. Tom Kean  Christie Whitman — Republicans had won statewide before. New Jersey wanted a reformer in 2009 and  Christie  seemed to fit that bill.
The most telling moment from  Christie’s  final State of the State address this month was a sentence he ad-libbed. The prepared text read: “We ran to be a Governor who did not just mark time. We ran to win and to be a Governor of consequence.” What  Christie  said during the speech was  “I ran to win. I always ran to win. I ran to be a governor of consequence.”
That’s it in a nutshell. The fatal flaw. A chief executive consumed with winning who would assemble a team consumed with his winning. It explains more than anything how Bridgegate could come to pass  how a smart  politically savvy man like  Christie  could put so many of the wrong people in high-profile jobs. Did he know before the George Washington Bridge lane closures  during the lane closures or shortly after the lane closures that created a massive four-day traffic jam? At this point it matters less than that he always knew too many people on his team were capable of being punitive  petty and destructive in the cause of  Christie  winning.
 Christie  tried to minimize the scandal.  He  wasted millions of taxpayer dollars on a whitewash report prepared by high-priced lawyers.  He  bled NJ Transit dry.
 He  bullied.  He  baited. And just as Sandy had made  him  a star  Bridgegate made  him  a pariah. Not all at once. But by the time  he  left New Jersey to raise money for Republican governors across the nation and then to openly pursue the presidency   he  was already failing in New Jersey.
I once was as close to a Christie cheerleader as  he  could find in the New Jersey media. There was a time when I believed  he  was the real deal.  He  was funny  well informed and enjoyed a vigorous debate on issues — at least off the record.
The brilliance of  Christie  remains somewhere inside him  but he was not the greatest natural politician I will ever see. The greatest natural politician would never forget that he was entirely dependent on the charity of others — voters.  Christie  once told a young man at a town hall who asked how to get into politics that you first have to ask people for their votes. He said a candidate had to recognize that voters could choose anyone they wanted  that receiving a vote was a gift.
The governor forgot that lesson or  as his ratings tanked  decided it no longer mattered. He became more important than anything. It was not about New Jersey winning  but  Christie  winning.
Voters elected  Christie  to serve until Jan. 16  2018  but he checked out on Election Day 2013.
Neutral

What is the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Garth Brooks ? UPDATE: Miranda Lambert has offered her take on  the Garth Brooks'  CMA Awards lip-syncing controversy  reinforcing Anderson East's initial post blasting  Brooks  for miming  his  song "Ask Me How I Know." "If you can't sing then don't. It's better to be honest than to pretend " she wrote. "I think it's bull shit. My favorite performances in the show were live live. The truth." Lambert's comments appear on East's Instagram.
While Wednesday's CMA Awards were preceded by a controversy over media guidelines  one of the night's hottest topics continues to be how  Garth Brooks  â who repeated as Entertainer of the Year â lip-synced  his  performance. Anderson East  an artist who isn't usually known for sharing much in the way of personal or political sentiments  did not appreciate the effort.
Related Garth Brooks Admits to Lip-Syncing 2017 CMA Awards Performance Newly-crowned Entertainer of the Year says he made "game-time call" to preserve his voice on "Ask Me How I Know"
Indeed  as soon as  Brooks  launched into the performance of  his  single "Ask Me How I Know " social media was afire with speculation that the megastar was not singing live. Shortly after coming offstage in the pressroom   Brooks  addressed the accusations head-on.

Negative