In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Example Input: Comment: Canada's ash my ass, its Alaska's ash!
Example Output: Obscene

Example Input: Comment: Human proxies for Salman Rushdi continue to be attacked and killed in the western World by the same religion that is conducting  reciprocal mass murders in the Middle East.

Trudeau has  brought thousands into Canada and more are pouring across our borders due to relaxed visa requirements instituted by Trudeau for " mexicans".

Just in time, as Al Quada have now just perfected the lap top and iPad bomb for flights from Canada into the US.
All will be denied and Aga Khan will continue to contribute to the Trudeau Foundation and provide free holidays for the Trudeau family.

This disaster was all so easily predicted.

Yet, 40 % of canadian voters behaved like sheep to the slaughter.

How green we are..
Example Output: Non-obscene

Example Input: Comment: Pius took a great teaching on sexual freedom for Downs Syndrom and mentally ill patients and turned it on its head. As I said, he was acting in response to Lambreth. The majority of the encyclical was a vainglorous attempt to fight back against moderity. It was so quaint that there was an outcry for the Council to repeal it, which the Trads fought off and ultimately Ottoviani scuttled. Still, the economic logic still stands and I have no qualms in wanting birth control not to be necesssary for ecoomic reasons. Benedict echoed that in Caritas in Veritate. As for the pill, it regulated my ex-wife's emotions and removing it probably helped cause our divorce.
Example Output:
Non-obscene