We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Ex Input:
In the US at least, we have the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness as long as it doesn't infringe upon the rights of others.

Ex Output:
Valid


Ex Input:
As I say this case does not fit the bill completely, but I'm sure similar cases must arise and they should be an exception.

Ex Output:
Invalid


Ex Input:
The reason to be for the death penalty is because it is just; the same foundation of support for all sanctions.

Ex Output:

Valid