In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.
--------
Question: Comment: Damn youre a pussy man

Answer: Obscene


Question: Comment: I guess you'd call me a liberal because I tend to favor governmental intervention when "private" behaviors pose serious risks to others.  In this case, however, I swing to the Right.  Assuming that Mr. Jarlstrom's primary "transgression" was to write that he knew something about "engineering" (a generic term), the Board's crusade against him is inane., to say the least.  That would be like me (a retired political scientist) being fined for  illegally "practicing law" because I teach a course in mediation as an effective legal tool.  The case against Mr. Jarlstrom appears to be utter nonsense.  Perhaps one should attack Board members for their lack of proper qualifications.

Answer: Non-obscene


Question: Comment: This is an embarrassment for the pride movement. They persevered and got what they wanted but then they roll over and turn turtle when another special interest group takes over their show.  Stand up for your principals like you did before. Yes black lives matter and so does the life of every other human. These social problems can only be resolved if there is a will from within. Outsiders are not going to do it. This type of action shows that the BLM are simply using others who won't stand up for themselves.

Answer:
Non-obscene