We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Input: Consider Input: Sent1: Ask the family members of who he killed if he deserves death.
 Sent2: Think of the torment in the families minds,knowing that that killer is doing everything he can to get out.And that killer has help,he has the people that want to ban the death penalty!!!!!

Output: Not similar


Input: Consider Input: Sent1: Since I am not related to any death-row-inmate's victims (of murder, rape, molestation), I do not classify my desire to see them dead as vengeance.
 Sent2: If I heard of an innocent stranger being brutally killed, I might want to see the perpetrator suffer because of the suffering of the victim - that is VENGEANCE pure and simple.

Output: Not similar


Input: Consider Input: Sent1: I don't think the death penalty should be banned.
 Sent2: I believe there are certain crimes where the death penalty is an acceptable punishment.


Output: Similar