In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: threat and non-threat. Threat is a statement that someone will be hurt or harmed, especially if the person does not do something in particular.

[Q]: Comment: No. I'm sorry.  We are allowed to call out the Ford family legacy as harmful and embarrassing AND still also be appalled by bureaucratic waste, left wingers and right alike.  That's yet another reason why I loathe the number Rob and his strategists pulled over on us, the ridiculous us vs them, suburban vs urban, elites vs working guy baloney.  Why do people eat that up?  (God bless -- and help -- America!!)
[A]: Non-threat


[Q]: Comment: Your comment has way too much common sense in it for this site.  Watch it get whacked.
[A]: Threat


[Q]: Comment: My spouse and I are in our sixties, and I can't take a punch like I used to. She's partly disabled. So we have a simple rule that applies to all the little Trayvons, Michael Browns or any other thug, SJW or AntiFaG scum regardless of ethnicity or hallucinatory perception of their gender: invade my home or assault me or my wife in any way and I will be your judge, jury and executioner.

Without hesitation, mercy or remorse. Why? Because you earned it.

When you broke into my home or assaulted us outside of it, you left your so-called "civil rights" in your other pants. We have no obligation whatsoever to submit to what at our age could be a fatal beating. So our choice is a simple one: we live, you die.
[A]:
Threat