In this task, you must classify if a given review is positive/negative, indicating your answer as P or N.
--------
Question: one of the 90s ' most unwelcome thriller trends returns from the grave : it 's the " _ _ _ from hell " movie !
starting in the early nineties , we were subjected to nearly every conceivable combination of relationships - from - hell !
there were boyfriends from hell , friendly neighborhood cops from hell , nannies from hell , and even secretaries from hell .
but hush has found an old standby that somehow was forgotten in the rush : the mother - in - law from hell ! ! ! ! !
the mother - in - law in question is martha , played by jessica lange .
she has been single - handedly running the family horse farm , kilronan .
her son , jackson ( johnathon schaech ) and his girlfriend , helen ( gwyneth paltrow ) , live in new york , and have no intention to move back down south to the rural kilronan .
but those intentions are about to change .
you see , martha lives by manipulation .
she has used it in years past to breed many championship horses .
now , she believes she can use it to breed herself a grandson .
though at first , helen finds martha charming , soon she is caught in the domineering martha 's web of deception .
it 's hard to understand why nobody ever wises up to martha ' schemes .
as written , most of the characters in the film must be very slow witted .
but then , the film even treats the audience like idiots .
it tries to get away with things ( like leaving a critical piece of evidence in a rather unlikely place ) without even batting an eye .
then again an audience which accepts characters as shallow as these is n't one that 's likely to question details .
jessica lange 's martha is the only semi - developed character in the film , and she applies her talents to redeem it as much as she can .
a character that could have been simply awful is merely groan - worthy .
gwyneth paltrow does n't have much to build upon , as helen 's only character trait seems to be " daughter - in - law " .
still , she fares better than johnathon schaech , whose character is so nonexistent , he 's inexplicably missing for much of the film .
still , there have been much worse
" _ _ _
_ from hell " films .
even with its paper - thin characters and ludicrous setups , hush manages to create a few thrills in a color - by - numbers fashion .
you know what 's coming , but occasionally the film will deliver a shock or two .
the old formulas are around for a reason , but that does n't mean they taste fresh .

Answer: N


Question: its a stupid little movie that trys to be clever and sophisticated , yet trys a bit too hard .
with the voices of woody allen , gene hackman , jennifer lopez , sylvester stallone , and sharon stone , this computer - animated yak - fest ( think toy story [ 1996 ] filled with used merchandising ) is one for the ant - eaters .
the main story is the independence of a worker named z ( allen ) .
he wants more to life than just digging away underground for the colony .
when he finds out about ` ` insectopia , " a mythical place where all insects can run free , z , along with his colony 's princess ( stone ) , journey out into the world to find a meaning for life .
about 15 minutes into the picture , i began to wonder what the point of the film was .
halfway through , i still did n't have an answer .
by the end credits , i just gave up and ran out .
antz is a mindless mess of poor writing and even poorer voice - overs .
allen is nonchalant , while i would have guessed , if i had n't seen her in the mighty and basic instinct , stone ca n't act , even in a cartoon .
this film is one for the bugs : unfunny and extremely dull .
hey , a bug 's life may have a good time doing antz in .

Answer: N


Question: contact is a nobly intentioned but ultimately unsatisfying adaptation of carl sagan 's only novel .
it details the circumstances surrounding the first clear sign of intelligent life in outer space and their effects on the life of a young and idealistic radio astronomer named ellie arroway ( jodie foster ) .
we first meet ellie at a giant radio telescope in puerto rico , where she is part of the seti ( search for extraterrestrial intelligence ) project .
her research is quickly killed , however , by her highly political david drumlin ( tom skerrit ) , who disdains " pure research " in favor of science with " commercial applications .
she goes in search of private funding and is turned down at every step until she pitches her project to a corporation run by the mysterious s .
r .
hadden ( john hurt ) .
then , with that money just about to finally dry up , ellie is sitting out in the desert near the very large array in new mexico when she hears over her headphones a very powerful pulsing radio signal .
in the movie 's most exciting and believable sequence , ellie and her coworkers determine that the signal has to be coming from the star vega .
at first the signal appears to be just sequences of prime numbers , then it turns out to be a tv signal of the berlin olympics bounced back to earth from 50 years before .
further decoding , with hadden 's help , reveals another layer to message , containing detailed plans for a massive and complex machine .
it appears that the machine is a transport that will allow one person to travel to the aliens ' home world .
of course , the big question becomes " who gets to ride it ?
" ( right after " who 's gon na pay for this thing ? " ) . to boil it down , ellie gets denied the seat in the machine because she bluntly acknowledges her atheism , while drumlin gets to go because he rather insincerely professes his deep religious faith .
drumlin is killed and the machine destroyed when religious fanatics bomb the launch platform ( apparently to keep " godless science " from talking to god , or something like that ) .
then hadden reappears with startling news .
he has secretly constructed a second machine off the coast of japan and has reserved the ride for ellie , in whom he has taken a rather paternal interest .
ellie boards
the machine and is transported through some kind of wormhole to a dream - like place that looks a lot like waikiki beach before they built the hotels , where she meets the aliens who take the form of her late father ( david morse ) .
when she returns home , no one believes her .
she was not even gone for one second , they say , even though she remembers being gone for 18 hours .
her story is officially discredited , although believed by a large segment of the public ( who do n't even have to know that her computer records of the trip contain nothing but static . . .
eighteen hours worth of static ) .
there is a lot to like about contact
so i will highlight those points first .
ellie arroway is a well - rounded character portrayed by one of the best actresses currently working .
neither the character nor the performance has the same depth as clarice starling in silence of the lambs , but that 's a tough standard to meet .
ellie is interesting in that she is woman defined by a strange array of father figures .
her real father is an idealized movie dad who does nothing in the film but love his daughter unconditionally .
drumlin comes across as a distant stepfather to whom ellie is like an irritating teenager who wants to use his toys to get into trouble .
hadden obviously has affection for ellie , but in the end he seems to see her as his creation , nothing more than his favorite piece on the chess board .
even palmer joss ( matthew mcconaughey ) , ellie 's love interest , takes a paternalistic interest in ellie , seeing her as a misguided person who needs protection from her own impulses .
the film is technically impressive , especially in the scenes where the message is first received and during the destruction of the first machine .
the part of the film dealing with the message has the best presentation of real science in a film since the andromeda strain .
the film falls apart when dealing with its central theme , the dichotomy between science and religion .
this is a very real debate but contact boils it down to a simplistic level that never really touches on the actual issues involved .
the film presents science pretty well ( until the end ) so the real problem stems from it presentation of religious faith .
religious people are presented as shallow caricatures .
rob lowe plays a ralph reed clone named richard rank ( very subtle , guys ) , the voice of the religious right .
another religious figure is the fanatic who blows up the first machine ( jake busey ) .
the only really fleshed - out religious person , palmer joss , is supposed to be a minister of some sort , but his actual faith is left pretty vague .
i ca n't even say for certain that he was supposed to be a christian .
all we know is that he dropped out of the seminary and obviously has no qualms about pre - marital sex .
the film drops the science ball at the very end , when ellie appears to assert that there are some things even scientists must take on faith .
in a day and age when the theory of evolution is denounced by the religion right as an atheist " religious " doctrine , this is exactly the wrong message to send .
in a movie dealing with issues of science and faith , the last thing you want your scientist character to do is abandon the principle of scientific skepticism .
what ellie should have said was , " you should n't believe me . not without evidence , and i do n't have the evidence .
i know what happened
but you should n't take my word alone .
"
that is the voice of science speaking .
the character of david drumlin is another problem with this film .
his attitudes toward pure research project seem out of place for a person in his position .
also , his profession of " faith " before the selection committee is so nakedly and transparently insincere that only a pack of idiots should have fallen for it .
the last big problem is with the use of real personalities in various roles .
the media figures , such as bernard shaw and jay leno are n't so bad , in as much as their participation was voluntary .
the use of bill clinton , however , should give anyone pause .
first of all , lifting the image of a sitting head of state and inserting him into a fictional story line , thus using his words outside of the context in which they were spoken , is just plain creepy .
also , using the real president places this film between 1993 and 2001 , forever dating it .
people watching this film in the future will say , " hey , this never took place during clinton 's term .
" this bit of unreality will jar people out of their suspension of disbelief . also , the level of technology portrayed in the film is too advanced to take place before the first decade of the next century .
better to have had a fictitious president played by an actor or no president at all .
the film does raise an interesting question , although it never develops it in a satisfying way . if we were picking an emissary to send to an alien culture , would an atheist be automatically disqualified just because ninety percent of the population of the world professes a belief in god , or at least some form of supernatural creator ?
personally , i would hope not , since religion is basically an opinion , a form of ideology .
i would not want any form of ideological test for such an import task .

Answer:
P