In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: threat and non-threat. Threat is a statement that someone will be hurt or harmed, especially if the person does not do something in particular.

[Q]: Comment: So, to summarize, people who voted for Donald Trump and disagreed with you are stupid?
[A]: Non-threat


[Q]: Comment: More personal attacks. A sure sign you're losing the argument. Your excuses are pathetic.
[A]: Non-threat


[Q]: Comment: Very well said. I'm so disgusted at the moment I wouldn't have even put those sentences together. But what do you say when they can be so blatantly hypocritical?
These are the same academics who promote the concept of white privilege. 
The cities in Canada were 99% white in the early 1960s; they are now rapidly being  peopled by other nationalities. But its the whites that are privileged?
All measures of opportunity based on training and skills and even just plain circumstance, i.e. being in the right place at the right time are ALL displaced by these academics in favor of the plain racial concept of white privilege and then they will censor you if you even dare challenge the concept. 
I bet they will disqualify this very comment as being uncivilized!
[A]:
Non-threat