Given a text paragraph and a fact, generate 'True' if the fact can be inferred/concluded from the paragraph, otherwise generate 'False'. The input passage contains as set of logical statements so the fact can be marked either 'True' or 'False' if the relavant info regarding the fact is present in the given passage. If the Fact can't be marked True or False from the given paragraph, mark it as False. Don't use knowledge outside the given paragraph to check the fact.

[Q]: Paragraph: The bear is nice. The bear is not young. If the bear is red then the bear is round. All rough, young people are red. The bear is round. The bear is red. The bear is rough. If the bear is nice then the bear is not young. If the bear is young then the bear is not red. If the bear is round then the bear is rough. If someone is round and not young then they are nice. All round, nice people are not young. If the bear is rough and the bear is red then the bear is nice.     Question: The bear is rough.
[A]: True


[Q]: Paragraph: The bald eagle eats the lion. The bear needs the bald eagle. The bald eagle needs the bear. The lion eats the bald eagle. The bald eagle is young. The bear chases the bald eagle. The bear is big. If something eats the bald eagle then the bald eagle needs the lion. The bald eagle is big. The bald eagle needs the lion. The bear is rough. The bear is blue. The bald eagle is rough.     Question: The bear is not rough.
[A]: False


[Q]: Paragraph: The tiger is not kind. The cow is red. The cow does not chase the tiger. The bear is round. If something is rough and it visits the bear then the bear needs the cow. The tiger chases the cow. The tiger is rough. The tiger does not need the cow. The tiger is round. The bear chases the tiger. If something visits the bear then it is red. The bear is kind. If something visits the cow then it visits the bear. The bear needs the tiger. The tiger visits the cow. The bear is nice. The tiger is nice. The cow chases the bear.     Question: The tiger is kind.
[A]:
False