In this task, you're given a statement, and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence clearly disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3' corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.

Statement: Left to decide what part of the 1996 Act to strike as invalid, the court concluded that congressional intent regarding severability was unclear. Choices:  1. It was decided that the intent of severability was quite clear. 2. As a result, the court left the 1996 Act as it was originally written. 3. The court was able to decide which parts, if any, of the 1996 Act were invalid.
1

Statement: Surely home buyers are well aware that they're sacrificing mobility. Choices:  1. Home buyers make no sacrifices. 2. home buyers make sacrifices. 3. Home buyers are sad that they sacrifice mobility.
1

Statement: Human Rights in China, a New York-based group started by Chinese academics, offers a comprehensive site with links to a site for Wang Dan, the Tiananmen Square activist who was released from a long stint in prison only this spring. Choices:  1. Human Rights in China doesn't do anything to help. They're just in it for the money. 2. Human Rights in China worked very hard to help Wang Dan after his imprisonment.  3. A New York based group started by Chinese students called Human Rights in China offers a website with links to another website for Wang Dan, an activist who was released from a long prison sentence. 

1