Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.

Q: "Roseland's strict no-moshing rule... "

PLEASE! It was non-stop moshing ALL NIGHT! And probably one of the most intense Fucking circle pit Portland has ever seen!

A: Yes
****
Q: LeDoux intentionally stalling this bill is unprofessional, and moreover, unjust. Move the bill along to let the rest of Legislature vote on it and represent their Alaskan communities.

A: No
****
Q: WLTDO: Your comment, albeit accompanied by two article references is abusive propaganda (may I borrow your term agenda?) aimed at  disparaging gay people by offering up an analogy that being gay leads to violence. That is false. The fact is domestic violence can and does happen within all couples, and DV between straight couples is reported on  nearly daily in the RG. It is reported on with no one labeling the event as "a straight people lifestyle that leads to violence."  Lifestyle BTW, simply means "the way a person lives" e.g. vegan vs meat eater, and that differs from sexual orientation, which refers to the sex a person is attracted to (boy/girl, girl/girl). I think you tip your hat when you allude to a LGBTQ agenda.  And what would that be?    It's the 21st century, everybody is equal so get over yourself.

A:
Yes
****