We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Example Input: Sent1: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time.
 Sent2: That right to life was taken away, I agree, but we will not accomplish anything if we kill someone else.
Example Output: Not similar

Example Input: Sent1: When they are about to be shot just think what would be happening, some unlucky person would be dealing with the fact that they were going to have to take someone's life.
 Sent2: I say that they should be killed the same way that the person(s) that they killed were.
Example Output: Not similar

Example Input: Sent1: Given the scrutiny of death penalty cases, it seems that we would be more likely to lock someone up for life in prison and never uncover their innocence than we are to execute an innocent person.
 Sent2: We should not even have the death penalty just on the off chance that we might execute somebody who is innocent.
Example Output:
Not similar