Given a document, an entity and its sentiment towards the entity, verify if it is the correct sentiment towards the entity. Answer should be yes or no. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

Q: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Geert Wilders is Negative . Dutch anti-Islam politician Geert Wilders went on trial Monday for alleged hate speech  even as his popularity and influence in the Netherlands are near all time highs.
 Prosecutors say Wilders incited hatred against Muslims with remarks comparing Islam to Naziism and by calling for a ban on the Quran. Wilders argues he has a right to freedom of speech and his remarks were within the bounds of the law.
 If convicted  he faces up to a year in prison. He could keep his seat in parliament.
 On his Twitter account  Wilders said the start of his trial was a "terrible day."
 "The freedom of expression of at least 1.5 million people is standing trial together with me " he wrote  referring to the voters that made his Freedom Party the third-largest in national elections in June.
 But his lawyer  Bram Moszkowicz  told presiding judge Jan Moors at the start of the trial that Wilders would not answer questions during the trial.
 lawyer  Bram Moszkowicz  told presiding judge Jan Moors at the start of the trial that Wilders would not answer questions during the trial.
 "My client will  at my advice  exercise his right to silence today  tomorrow and the other days " Moszkowicz said. Moors then adjourned the case to consider a request from Wilders to explain his decision not to speak.
 He swept into the Amsterdam District Court complex in a police convoy and waved to supporters as he walked into the courtroom at the start of a trial scheduled to last seven days.
 Mohamed Rabbae  chairman of the moderate National Moroccan Council  said outside the court that he hoped judges would force Wilders to issue an apology for his past remarks.
 "We are not for getting Mr. Wilders in prison. We are for correcting him " he said.

A: no
****
Q: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Jacob Zuma is Neutral . The cartoon caused a storm when the Times published it in 2008  two years after Jacob Zuma had been acquitted of rape charges. But van der Berg said Zuma had not followed up on threats to sue until now.
 Zuma is claiming 4 million rand (about $570 000) for humiliation and degradation and 1 million rand (about $140 000) for damage to his reputation. His spokesman  Zizi Kodwa  refused to comment Tuesday.
 The cartoon also showed Zuma's political allies encouraging him as they held down a writhing  screaming figure with a sash identifying her as the "justice system."
 It appeared in the newspaper as Zuma's political party led a protest campaign to have the corruption charges dropped against him. Zuma at the time was preparing to lead his African National Congress party in general elections. Prosecutors dropped the charges on the eve of the vote  and Zuma took office in 2009.
 Buti Manamela  then a leader of the Young Communist League  filed a formal complaint about the cartoon before South Africa's Human Rights Commission in 2008. The South African Communist Party leader was among the ANC allies depicted in the cartoon.

A: no
****
Q: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Nikolas Cruz is Positive . Having breathlessly reported that  Florida gunman Nikolas Cruz  was a member of a white supremacist group  media outlets across the world failed to issue retractions when it emerged that this story was completely fake news.
The farce began when the Anti-Defamation League and Associated Press reported that a representative of the Republic of Florida Militia  a group that believes in a âwhite ethnostate â told them that  Cruz  was a member of the organization.
However  it quickly emerged that the story had begun as a prank on the notorious 4chan messaging board after members had convinced another individual  Jordan Jereb  to falsely tell the media that  Cruz  was an âaffiliateâ of the white supremacist group.
This was then picked up by the ADL and the Associated Press and reported as fact. In reality   Cruz  was never a member of the group  which is based in Tallahassee  about 430 miles away from where the shooting took place.
Law enforcement officials in Florida subsequently confirmed that they had found no connection between  Cruz  and the white supremacist group.
Almost 24 hours after it was confirmed that the original story about  Cruz  being a member of a white supremacist group was fake news  the AP  the ADL and others have failed to remove tweets and news stories that are completely erroneous.
Jonathan Greenblatt  the CEO of the ADL  still has a tweet at the top of his Twitter page which claims  âSpokesperson for white supremacist group Republic of Florida admitted to ADL that  Nikolas Cruz   alleged perpetrator of deadly Parkland school shooting  was a member & trained with his group  which seeks to create a âwhite ethnostate.â
BREAKING: Spokesperson for white supremacist group Republic of Florida admitted to ADL that  Nikolas Cruz   alleged perpetrator of deadly Parkland school shooting  was a member & trained with his group  which seeks to create a âwhite ethnostate.â More info: [Link] â Jonathan Greenblatt (@JGreenblattADL) February 15  2018
Time Magazine still has a headline up which states  What to Know About Republic of Florida  the White Supremacist Militia That  Nikolas Cruz  Attended  except  Cruz  never attended the group at all.

A:
yes
****