In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Q: Comment: Douglas Saunders is right about one thing.  Blacks are better off under Obama. Where else in the world can a single Black woman have six children from six different "Baby Daddies" and collect $60,000 in cash cards and housing benefits annually, free medical care for her family, pay no taxes, doesn't even have to look for work let alone work, and when her children are in school they get two or three free meals a day, and free meals even in some states during summer vacation. And the "Baby Daddies" don't have to pay child support. Life is good in the hood.

A: Non-sexual-explicit
****
Q: Comment: It's equally ludicrous my friend.  I intended say there is more than one behavior that causes addiction and prescription drugs are every bit as likely to destroy families.   The city wants to chose their 'bad' behavior to tax.  It's not a fair tax it's a sin tax.  I ask again why chose marijuana users?

A: Non-sexual-explicit
****
Q: Comment: I hope this case is appealed and the judge is investigated. Hope the public can make a case for that, so something good can come of this horrible situation. Women should clearly have no faith in the justice system of MS and NF after the last 2 weeks,

A:
Non-sexual-explicit
****