We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

Example Input: A lot of the most popular laws (unconstitutional in my estimation from many court cases) were examined by the CDC and NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCE and found no benefit IN ANY OF THE CURRENT ILLEGAL GUN REGULATION/BAN LAWS.
Example Output: Valid

Example Input: Evne not adjusting for the time period, grammatical experts still ascertain that the second ammendment in no way allows for the limit of that personal right.
Example Output: Valid

Example Input: I think we recognize that gun control laws can reduce the number of criminals owning guns although not disarm every criminal.
Example Output:
Valid