The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.

[EX Q]: Context: 'Hello, how are you doing today?' 'i am doing great! how about you?' 'I'm doing pretty well, just preparing for this camping trip.'
Utterance: 'ME as well! we are a group of big eaters, and are looking to take lots of food.'
[EX A]: Yes

[EX Q]: Context: 'i am great, super excited about camping as well, are there any supplies that you really need?' 'i really need water and food. we did not get enough of those.' 'Those are my priorities as well, how about you get all the food and two firewoods, and i get all the water and one firewood, does that sound fair?'
Utterance: 'i would prefer water instead of food if possible, but i am sure we can work it out.'
[EX A]: No

[EX Q]: Context: 'I would take 3 packages of food and just 1 package of water. Is it okay for you?' 'No, I don't take this. Because food is important for my child and me.' 'Try to understand our situation. We had food a week back. We were drinking only water for the whole week. We are dying of hunger. Kindly understand our situation.'
Utterance: 'Even me too facing the same, but i am ready to share one food with you. You can offer me more water to safe myself without dying. Both will be happy'
[EX A]:
Yes