TASK DEFINITION: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.
PROBLEM: Comment: But federal government funded and controlled healthcare is currently about 67% of national healthcare, leaving private insurance at about 33%. So how will wringing "ridiculous deductibles and premiums to the for-profit insurance companies" of a small percent of national healthcare result in enough funding for Medicare-for-all. The math doesn't add up unless income and payroll taxes are increased significantly.

And remember not all private insurance is for profit, Kaiser-Permante and other private providers are non-profit.

SOLUTION: Non-identity-attack

PROBLEM: Comment: The author of this little piece of trashy fiction should be fired.

SOLUTION: Non-identity-attack

PROBLEM: Comment: His comment was offensive.  But in any procedure that has an ounce of due process, things like context, someone's past record & contributions, and contrition are taken into account.    

None of this matters to the social justice mob.  "I am offended" overrides decades of very meaningful contributions.

The mob will be what it will be unfortunately.  It is up to institutions to ensure we don't cave into it, we allow due process to dictate, and we push back to ensure important institutions don't succumb to the emotions of the day, and that we don't lose good people as a result.

SOLUTION:
Non-identity-attack