Given a document, an entity and its sentiment towards the entity, verify if it is the correct sentiment towards the entity. Answer should be yes or no. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Kenneka Jenkins is Positive . The Cook County medical examiner's office has determined that  Kenneka Jenkins'  death at a Rosemont hotel was an accident.  She  died of hypothermia from exposure to cold in a walk-in freezer   it  said.
Surveillance videos released by police days later show  Jenkins   alone  wandering through a kitchen area near the freezer not long after she disappeared.
The initial lack of information released by authorities drew activists and sparked online conspiracy theories that she was attacked and killed. The speculation was fueled by a number of videos on social media appearing to show the party and some of  Jenkins ' friends.
The autopsy found mucosal erosions  a type of lesion  that indicated  Jenkins  had suffered from hypothermia  the medical examiner's office said in a statement.
The combination of alcohol and topiramate found in  Jenkins 's blood can cause "impaired memory and concentration  poor coordination  confusion and impaired judgement " among other adverse effects  the office said. This  plus cold exposure  could speed the onset of hypothermia and death  the medical examiner's office said.
On Sept. 27  the medical examiner's office went back for a follow-up investigation. A forensic pathologist assigned to  Jenkins ' case and the office's chief of investigations  a former New Orleans Police Department homicide detective lieutenant  went to the hotel and followed the path  Jenkins  took to a kitchen on the lower level of the hotel  the office said.
Rosemont police led the staff through the main kitchen area  up a set of stairs into a second kitchen area that was said to be unused at the time of  Jenkins ' death  the office said.
Inside the cooler is the walk-in freezer where  Jenkins  was discovered  the office said. At the time of the inspection  the cooler's thermometer indicated a temperature of 40 degrees Fahrenheit  and the freezer's thermometer indicated a temperature of 10 degrees Fahrenheit  the office said.
 The freezer Jenkins  was found in was capable of getting to a temperature of 8 degrees  the medical examiner's office noted.
 Kenneka Jenkins   19  was pronouced dead early Sept. 10  2017  after  she  was found in a walk-in freezer at the Crowne Plaza hotel in Rosemont. The Cook County Medical Examiner's Office released photos on Oct. 6  2017  related to the cause and manner of death for  Jenkins . (Tribune and Cook Co. Medical Examiner's Office photos) (Tribune and Cook Co. Medical Examiner's Office photos)
Rosemont police told the medical examiner's staff that the light inside the freezer was not on when  Jenkins  was found. There is a light switch outside the cooler door  the office said.
Video surveillance showed  Jenkins  entering the kitchen at approximately 3:32 a.m. on Sept. 9  but the recordings do not clearly show  her  entering the cooler and freezer because there are no cameras that directly show those doors  the office said.
 Jenkins  was discovered in the freezer approximately 21 hours after the video documented  her  entering the kitchen  the office said.
Citing the police investigation  the medical examiner said there's no evidence  Jenkins  was forced to consume the alcohol or the drug. There also was no evidence of another person near the kitchen with  Jenkins   and there was no evidence of an altercation or interaction with another individual immediately prior to  her  death  the office said.
The court filings also revealed that attorneys for  Jenkins ' family conducted a private investigation of the 19-year-old's death and found no evidence of injury from a physical attack or sexual assault.
Kenneka's mother had sought police assistance a few hours after her daughter disappeared  but a dispatcher told  her Jenkins  might have gone to a friend's place or passed out after drinking too much.
yes

Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Steve Bannon is Neutral . The attempts to curtail testimony to congressional investigators became clear this week when  former White House chief strategist Steve Bannon  appeared before the House Intelligence Committee and infuriated both sides of the aisle by refusing to answer questions about  his  work during the presidential transition and in the White House.
At some points during  Bannon 's six hours of closed-door testimony   his  attorney took breaks to confer via telephone with the White House counsel's office to clarify what questions could be answered and came back with the same guidance:  Bannon  could not discuss any activities related to the transition or  his  tenure in the White House.
 Bannon 's team negotiated ground rules with the White House counsel's office the week prior to his appearance before the House Intelligence Committee  according to a source familiar with the situation.
The President's personal legal team was aware of discussions between the White House counsel's office and  Bannon 's lawyer about protecting a possible privilege claim. But it wasn't their decision  according to a person familiar with the discussions. The protection of the privilege is a matter for the White House  not the President's legal team  because it relates to the office.
Before the hearing   Bannon 's lawyer informed a staff member of Rep. Devin Nunes  the California Republican who chairs the House Intelligence Committee  that  Bannon  planned to claim executive privilege on topics beyond the presidential campaign  a source said.
But that information was apparently tightly held. "It caught me personally by surprise" that  Bannon  asserted executive privilege  said Rep. Mike Conaway  the Texas Republican leading the committee's Russia investigation.
South Carolina Rep. Trey Gowdy and Florida Rep. Tom Rooney  the other two Republicans leading the Russia probe along with Conaway  also said they weren't aware of any agreement between the White House and committee staff about the scope of  Bannon 's testimony.
"They wouldn't do that because I'd ask what I think is relevant to ask  and if you've got a legal privilege you can assert it " Gowdy said  adding that  Bannon  was in a "legally indefensible position."
As it became clear on Tuesday that  Bannon  was refusing to answer questions  the committee served  him  with a subpoena to compel  him  to divulge additional information.
But the scope of what  Bannon  was claiming was privileged shocked members from both parties.
" His  version of executive privilege is it covers the transition  the time  he  was at the White House and covers time forever " Gowdy told Fox News Wednesday. "That is no one's definition of executive privilege."
Lawmakers were also offended that  Bannon  had already divulged details about some of  his  post-campaign activities in Michael Wolff's explosive book "Fire and Fury " but then refused to discuss those events with the committee.  Bannon 's attorney also informed members that he would  in fact  answer those questions when he meets with special counsel Robert Mueller's team because executive privilege doesn't apply to Mueller's investigation.
Democrats charge that  Bannon 's appearance before the House committee marks the broadest attempt so far at using privilege to shield events that occurred from the moment Trump was elected.
Republicans haven't ruled out the possibility of holding  Bannon  in contempt  but at least one GOP member -- Gowdy -- suggested it was unlikely.
House Speaker Paul Ryan downplayed the issue of whether witnesses like  Bannon  might be abusing the bounds of executive privilege.
Still   Bannon 's stonewalling sparked a sharp warning from Conaway -- the Republican leading the House Russia probe -- to White House aides who might follow the Bannon model: "We're going to insist on getting questions we need to answer our report."
yes

Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Barnaby Joyce Barnaby is Neutral . Image copyright EPA Image caption  Barnaby Joyce  will take one week of leave  Malcolm Turnbull says
In a press briefing  he condemned  Barnaby Joyce  for a "shocking error of judgement".
 Mr Joyce  will take a leave of absence from Monday amid scrutiny over whether he breached ministerial standards.
Both  Mr Joyce  and Mr Turnbull deny that any rules  as defined  were broken.
" Barnaby  made a shocking error of judgement in having an affair with a young woman working in  his  office "  he  said.
"In doing so  he  has set off a world of woe for those women  and appalled all of us. Our hearts go out to them."

no