In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Comment: Why should we have to pay to help idiots
use illegal dope. Let them die. That or bring
in Durete. He has what it takes to stop this crap.
Obscene

Comment: We have plenty of money  lets give em a new car and house too.  PERS is fully funded so lets splurge!!! Darn right this is a emergency those illegal aliens are dropping like flies.
Obscene

Comment: PERA's antiquated investment strategy has not helped returns. Index funds have beaten the old pension asset allocation models for many years. College endowments and more enlightened state pension funds are switching large chunks of assets to passive investments.  The projected 7.25% return, weighed down as it will be by large investments in fixed income investments, is wildly unrealistic. There is no reason to keep more than two or three years of pension obligations invested in fixed income assets. There is also zero justification to invest in foreign stocks. That diversification argument was destroyed years ago. If the US stock market catches a cold, the rest of the world will be coming down with double pneumonia.  This ain't rocket science.

It was surprising not to see coverage of PERA's multi-million dollar slush fund for small business. This is PERA's lame attempt to pick winners and losers, something governments have never been particularly successful at doing.

Non-obscene