We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

[EX Q]: Sent1: Various groups have been unable to show that the criminal use of firearms leads to more deaths than the number of lives that are saved by private and legal gun ownership.
 Sent2: Private ownership of guns may indeed add to the number of weapons held by criminals, but it is not their major source of weapons.
[EX A]: Not similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: Why can a state attach limits "in their own individual RKBA" (such as prohibited concealed carry) that supercede the second amendment- unless the second amendment does not protect concealed carry.
 Sent2: The federal government has NO business dabbling in concealed carry regulation, unless they are going to declare it a protected activity under the second amendment.
[EX A]: Similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: But gun hater pilot will demand that the right to bear arms be limited or banned to keep criminals from getting guns.
 Sent2: Gun haters will stop when the right to bear arms is banned!
[EX A]:
Similar