We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

[EX Q]: Sent1: Or that the Second Amendment only keeps the federal government from passing new gun control laws?
 Sent2: Since that ruling most lower federal courts have continued to reject the argument that the second amendment protects an indivual right to own a gun.
[EX A]: Not similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: Of course, nothing in the text of the Second Amendment places location-based limits on the right to keep and bear arms.
 Sent2: The right to bear arms is explicit and clear in the second amendment.
[EX A]: Not similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: Also if both points are true, would you sacrifice you right to protect your rights with guns (rather than politically) for a crime rate low enough where you don't feel you need a gun for protection?
 Sent2: If you need guns to ensure that your government doesn't become corrupt or tyranical you wouldn't want them to know where the guns are, would you?
[EX A]:
Not similar