In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: threat and non-threat. Threat is a statement that someone will be hurt or harmed, especially if the person does not do something in particular.

Comment: Ah, I don't know about the "far left" [am somewhat unsure what/who you're referring to] but my remark had little to do with "the more popular religions in the US", unless you consider religious sects that post large signs saying "If you worship the Earth, I spit on your Mother", publish comments such as: "Nuke them [Moslems] until they glow; then shoot them in the dark.", call for beheading infidels, or teach that nonbelievers should burn in hell, etc, etc, etc - as outstandingly popular in the US.  And I really don't believe that ANYONE [not even most heinous of the "Far Left"] is asking that the straight population "conform" to trans-gender people either - is that even possible?? I don't think so.
Just saying - replying to comment means so much more, if you reply to the comment that posted.
Threat

Comment: I like how they twist her words regarding "trade with open borders" to something about having no immigration process whatsoever. The "free market" people should LOVE what she says about free trade but since it comes from a mouth that is a) owned by a woman and b) owned by Hillary, they HATE IT all of a sudden. 

It is pretty silly to read conservatives' comments when they are all, line by line, taken from a Faux News or Breitbart article.
Non-threat

Comment: Simply put, Wynne can't do anything right. What a disaster. These restrictions are just down right ridiculous, like something out of the draconian 1930s and 40s.

Non-threat