Given a paragraph about movies and a set of conversational questions and answers about the paragraph, say whether the passage contains sufficient information to answer the follow-up question. Say Yes if it is answerable; otherwise, say No. The paragraph has the prefix 'CONTEXT:'. Each conversation question has a prefix `Q:` followed by the answer prefix `A:`, and the follow-up question has a prefix `FOLLOWUP_Q:`.

CONTEXT: Keeping in mind what we now know (that the monster is The Man In Black), we can only speculate at what John actually saw. Each person who saw the smoke monster presumably saw more than just a large cloud of smoke - they saw some kind of vision in the monster (if memory serves, this is what happened with Mr. Eko for example). What John saw probably affected him in a way that he wanted to keep whatever vision he saw to himself.  <sep>  Q: Why didn't Locke say he saw the monster? A: What John saw probably affected him in a way that he wanted to keep whatever vision he saw to himself  Q: Why do you think John wanted to do this? A: we can only speculate at what John actually saw  Q: Can you shed any other light on his motives or his background? A: Each person who saw the smoke monster presumably saw more than just a large cloud of smoke - they saw some kind of vision in the monster  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: What about the monster, is there some deeper meaning there?
Yes

CONTEXT: I assumed that this was because he was about to die. I mean, really die. It's the only instance of a player character losing their last life in the movie so in universe it made sense to me that it would be a different effect. Sadly I could not find any sources confirming this.  <sep>  Q: Why didn't Seaplane explode when stung by a mosquito?
No

CONTEXT: Regarding whether "it's all editing", the answer is yes, and that's not just this splice. All of what you see when you see a finished movie in a theater is the result of editing. In his Masterclass, David Mamet repeated a maxim regarding movies: "You make a movie three times. Once when you write it, once when you film it, and once when you edit it." To actually answer the question, the frames that were spliced in were filmed at some point, and likely many frames or even feet were filmed. Then, during editing, a few frames were selected for each splice and edited into the desired spot in the film. In terms of how he filmed it, they just picked a set and had Brad Pitt in costume and makeup and filmed some footage. They also could have easily spliced in footage filmed for totally different scenes. When Fight Club was made, digital film editing using tools such as Avid was quite popular, and Fight Club was almost certainly edited digitally. This makes adding frames much easier than editing by cutting film. But splicing frames by actually cutting film isn't super difficult. Fight Club shows Tyler doing this in his spare time while working as a projectionist.  <sep>  Q: How did David Fincher splice Brad Pitt into multiple frames? A: ny fram  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: In Flight Club, you can actually see Tyler Durden in a few frames before we ever meet him. How did Dacid Fincher film those momentary appearances?

Yes