In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Input: Consider Input: Comment: that you are so pompously arrogant to speak on behalf of all the public, you might consider counseling to address your inflated ego problem.

Output: Non-sexual-explicit


Input: Consider Input: Comment: And yet studies and academia notes that it is the conservative base that thrives on low information and avoidance of critical debate.    I guess that is why you prefer simplistic and negative attacks as opposed to reasoned debate. 

Let me guess:  
*Climate change is a hoax
* Economic disparity is not the system but lazy people from the left
* USA good and Trump amazing and China is pure evil
* Anything to the left of my views is Marxism, despite never having read Karl. 
etc. etc.

Output: Non-sexual-explicit


Input: Consider Input: Comment: If we go by the writer's logic, all cities should increase taxes on their rich, so high, that all the rich leave the city because as per the writer when rich will leave "Cheaper housing, fewer jerks. It’s a win/win". Listen to the writer, all cities throw out your rich. I hope the writer gets the sarcasm


Output: Non-sexual-explicit