TASK DEFINITION: Given a passage, construct a question on the basis of the information present in the passage. Construct the question in such a way that (i) it is unambiguous, (ii) it is answerable from the passage, (iii) its answer is unique (iv) it answer uses text phrases from the passage. Avoid creating questions that (i) can't be answered correctly without actually understanding the passage and (ii) uses the same words or phrases given in the passage.
PROBLEM: Human insulin is commonly used to treat hyperglycemia in patients with diabetes, but its potential link with female breast cancer is under debate. This study investigated whether human insulin use might be associated with breast cancer risk in Taiwanese women with type 2 diabetes.', 'The reimbursement databases of all Taiwanese diabetic patients from 1996 to 2009 were retrieved from the National Health Insurance. An entry date was set at 1 January 2004 and a total of 482,033 women with type 2 diabetes were followed up for breast cancer incidence until the end of 2009. Incidences for ever-users, never-users and subgroups of human insulin exposure (using tertile cutoffs of time since starting insulin, cumulative dose and cumulative duration of insulin) were calculated and the adjusted hazard ratios were estimated by Cox regression. The potential risk modification by concomitant treatment with metformin, statin and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker (ACEI/ARB) was also evaluated.', 'There were 59,798 ever-users and 422,235 never-users of human insulin, with respective numbers of incident breast cancer of 559 (0.93 %) and 4,711 (1.12 %), and respective incidence of 207.9 and 215.1 per 100,000 person-years. The overall adjusted hazard ratio (95 % confidence interval) did not show a significant association with insulin [1.033 (0.936-1.139)]. However, patients in the third tertiles of dose-response parameters might show a significantly higher risk of breast cancer while compared to never-users: 1.185 (1.026-1.368), 1.260 (1.096-1.450) and 1.257 (1.094-1.446) for ≥67 months for time since starting insulin, ≥39,000 units for cumulative dose of insulin, and ≥21.8 months for cumulative duration of insulin, respectively. Additional analyses suggested that the breast cancer risk associated with human insulin use might be beneficially modified by concomitant use of metformin, statin and ACEI/ARB.

SOLUTION: Does prolonged use of human insulin increase breast cancer risk in Taiwanese women with type 2 diabetes?

PROBLEM: Neisseria meningitidis are common colonizers of the human nasopharynx. In some circumstances, N. meningitidis becomes an opportunistic pathogen that invades tissues and causes meningitis. While a vaccine against a number of serogroups has been in effective use for many years, a vaccine against N. meningitidis group B has not yet been universally adopted. Bacterial heat shock protein complex (HSPC) vaccines comprise bacterial HSPs, purified with their chaperoned protein cargo. HSPC vaccines use the intrinsic adjuvant activity of their HSP, thought to act via Toll-like receptors (TLR), to induce an immune response against their cargo antigens. This study evaluated HSPC vaccines from N. meningitidis and the closely related commensal N. lactamica.', 'The protein composition of N. lactamica and N. meningitidis HSPCs were similar. Using human HEK293 cells we found that both HSPCs can induce an innate immune response via activation of TLR2. However, stimulation of TLR2 or TLR4 deficient murine splenocytes revealed that HSPCs can activate an innate immune response via multiple receptors. Vaccination of wildtype mice with the Neisseria HSPC induced a strong antibody response and a Th1-restricted T helper response. However, vaccination of mice deficient in the major TLR adaptor protein, MyD88, revealed that while the Th1 response to Neisseria HSPC requires MyD88, these vaccines unexpectedly induced an antigen-specific antibody response via a MyD88-independent mechanism.

SOLUTION: Do heat shock protein complex vaccines induce antibodies against Neisseria meningitidis via a MyD88-independent mechanism?

PROBLEM: Sacral nerve stimulation is proposed as a treatment for slow-transit constipation. However, in our randomized controlled trial we found no therapeutic benefit over sham stimulation. These patients have now been followed-up over a long-term period.', 'The purpose of this study was to assess the long-term efficacy of sacral nerve stimulation in patients with scintigraphically confirmed slow-transit constipation.', 'This study was designed for long-term follow-up of patients after completion of a randomized controlled trial.', 'It was conducted at an academic tertiary public hospital in Sydney.', 'Adults with slow-transit constipation were included.', 'At the 1- and 2-year postrandomized controlled trial, the primary treatment outcome measure was the proportion of patients who reported a feeling of complete evacuation on >2 days per week for ≥2 of 3 weeks during stool diary assessment. Secondary outcome was demonstration of improved colonic transit at 1 year.', 'Fifty-three patients entered long-term follow-up, and 1 patient died. Patient dissatisfaction or serious adverse events resulted in 44 patients withdrawing from the study because of treatment failure by the end of the second year. At 1 and 2 years, 10 (OR = 18.8% (95% CI, 8.3% to 29.3%)) and 3 patients (OR = 5.7% (95% CI, -0.5% to 11.9%)) met the primary outcome measure. Colonic isotope retention at 72 hours did not differ between baseline (OR = 75.6% (95% CI, 65.7%-85.6%)) and 1-year follow-up (OR = 61.7% (95% CI, 47.8%-75.6%)).

SOLUTION:
Does sacral Nerve Stimulation fail to Offer Long-term Benefit in Patients With Slow-Transit Constipation?