The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the uv-part strategy, otherwise output No. uv-part is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to undermine the requirements of the opponent. For instance, suggesting that the opponent would not need more firewood since they already have the basic supplies or a suggestion that there might be a store near the campsite where the opponent can get the supplies instead.

Example Input: Context: 'I believe there won't be any convenience stores around to buy food, And I plan on staying out longer than you so I will need more food to last me, Do you need food or water more?' 'How do you know you are staying longer than me? I haven't even said how long I am staying! I am also with a big group.  ☹️☹️  I need food the most, and I would like to take at least 2 extra waters.  I could possibly give up one of the food packages if you could part with 2 firewood.  Without extra food, I would have to do some fishing and cook the fish.' 'No. I won't part with any firewood because I can't stand being cold, and you can have 2 foods if you have a larger group if you give me 1 water. 🙂🙂'
Utterance: 'Sorry, that's not going to work for me.  ☹️ You have a water purifier? Doesn't sound like extra water is necessary.  I am in a hot, dry climate.  I can give up all the firewood to you, if you can leave me the three packages of food.  I would also like 2 waters.  '
Example Output: Yes

Example Input: Context: 'Camping yay!' 'Hello! how are you? hoping today is finding you well. I was wondering if I can get all 3 of your Firewood, I am willing to trade for all 3 waters. I am camping with 40 kids, its our annual youth camp. its rainy season too, I really want to ensure I have enough dried wood with us. need lots of firewood for the amount of cooking I will be doing, keep the camp warm, and specially to keep those pesky bugs away. what do you think?' 'I could really use the firewood too, it will be very cold where we are going. Since it will be cold, we will not be drinking much water. How about 2 firewood for you, 3 food for me?, '
Utterance: 'May I ask how many are going camping with you, i would agree, but the needs of children are different than adults. I will need at least 1 food, to ensure I have enough for the kids. '
Example Output: Yes

Example Input: Context: 'I don't want to be too hungry either but I think perhaps I might need an extra water to compensate for the lack of food.' 'Since I am giving you all of the firewood that you said was most important to you, I feel I should get at least the same amount of items as you, especially since you are getting exactly the firewood you want. I will need to stick to three waters and two food.' 'The firewood is most important to me to be sure. However, if you get more food and all of the water I could end up going hungry.☹️'
Utterance: 'Well I would be happy to exchange you one of your firewood for the one water you need. That way you won't go thirsty.'
Example Output:
Yes