TASK DEFINITION: Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
PROBLEM: Ian - actually the third reading clarified for me that the only folks winning in this are the attorneys and the Governor.  We will end in the weeds looking for who said whom could ask for what long before any valid action, like a judge recusing himself or the 'right' person having authority, is fully addressed.

SOLUTION: Yes

PROBLEM: "Unaffiliated voters for the most part tossed their ballots in the trash or the recycling bin, the data show."

I don't think the data even address how voters disposed of their ballots. Perhaps they burned them or used them as birdcage liner. Perhaps they are saving them for another election day, hoping to get in the last word. Maybe Lucy Vinis was just excited to see her name in print and she autographed and framed several copies for her friends.

The tally was heavily buoyed, by the way.

SOLUTION: No

PROBLEM: The protesters in Eugene were surprisingly tame. What about the folks in Albuquerque this week? Does Billy Hassler think their behavior is excused because Trump and his supporters are (allegedly) racist and sexist? Does (alleged) racism and sexism justify terrorism? If terrorists support Clinton and/or Sanders, are those candidates still more desirable than they would be if they were supported by racists and sexists? Of course, gasp, there are real racists and sexists that support those candidates! Clinton's husband, for example, he's not a sexist (wink wink).

SOLUTION:
Yes