In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Ex Input:
Comment: After reading this crap, can't wait until election time!

Ex Output:
Obscene


Ex Input:
Comment: Are you saying only Nazis are anti-Semites?

"They do not threaten me, and I am happy to let them live"
"If somebody is swinging a knife in your direction - you're not just FEELING under threat, you ARE under threat"
Surely you must concede the word 'threaten' can be used in a context which does not imply physical violence. I was, quite rightly I feel, confused by your statement which said nothing about a knife.

But that then raises the question of how the Nazi (your term) physically threatened you by shouting, "Jews will not replace us!". Remember you are prepared to kill this person without there being any physical threat to you or anyone else. He is shouting - not swinging a knife.

The laws of self-defence are complex if that is what you are going to rely on for going about shooting people. As a self-defense teacher I have the obligation to warn you, you will need a good lawyer for a knife/gun case.

You keep raising more and more questions. What is an 'ethnic group'?

Ex Output:
Non-obscene


Ex Input:
Comment: if you cannot understand that man cannot absolutely prove all things that are supported by science, i will not go around in circles with you.  You can continue to bathe in your own ignorance.  If you wish to provide an unbiased scientist who refutes the scientifically accepted theory that man is contributing more than negligibly to the progression of global warming then we can have a conversation, but it will probably be short.

Ex Output:

Non-obscene