The input contains a debate topic, an argument on the topic and a keypoint, separated by "<sep>". Your task is to answer if the keypoint matches the argument and summarizes exactly what the argument means, in the context of the given topic.

[Q]: Topic: We should ban human cloning<sep>Argument: Human cloning is an unnatural act that goes against the laws of nature. it is too dangerous of an act and is something man should not be tampering with.<sep>Keypoint: Cloning is unethical/anti-religious
[A]: False


[Q]: Topic: We should subsidize journalism<sep>Argument: Journalism is the heart of a nation development by spreading needed and vital information to the population. it's a noble duty which should gain recognition and more funding<sep>Keypoint: Journalism is important to information-spreading/accountability
[A]: True


[Q]: Topic: We should ban private military companies<sep>Argument: Private military companies do not have the same oversight as the armed forces so they can do what they want and this can lead to exploitation, profiteering and mistreatment of prisoners<sep>Keypoint: Private military companies cannot be trusted to be loyal to the hiring country
[A]:
False