Given the Question and Answer pair, detect whether the answer is acceptable or not. Denote acceptable answer as "yes", otherwise denote as "no". An acceptable answer is consistent with the context in question, detailed, long, and uses general knowledge of English. Answers that are not definite and suggest a variety of options are not acceptable answers.

Question: Is there a term for a well informed person who is not believed, or not listened to, or is even ridiculed? I do not necessarily mean some one before their time... I am thinking in more general terms. (I have googled this but the question is too broad and has too many keywords and if I try to narrow it down I lose the original meaning.) 
Answer: low man on the totem pole unsung expert And here are some related adjectives: marginalized Definition of marginalize: "to relegate to an unimportant or powerless position within a society or group." peripheral disregarded.
no

Question: I'm describing what an opiate addict looks like before recovery. Instead of saying "he looked like a vampire," I'd like to say something like "he looked [vampiric]." I actually just found out vampiric was a word, but I want something that sounds better (more colloquial/natural, I suppose) and covers a variety of traits (pale, emaciated, sickly, etc). Why I don't just use "vampiric": As @chepner commented: I think the idea is to find a word that isn't so "circular", and doesn't refer explicitly to vampires or require knowledge of vampires in context. If someone were to ask "What does a vampire look like?", then "It looks vampiric/vampirish" wouldn't be terribly helpful. I don't want to explicitly refer to drug addicts as vampires. I just want to capture those traits in the best way. 
Answer: For something often used to describe people and not an analogy like ghoulish or vampiric or cadaverous: pallid - very pale, in a way that looks unhealthy and not attractive.
yes

Question: Possible Duplicate: Is it correct to use "punctuation outside of the quotations", or "inside?" I've heard that you should always place ending punctuation inside of quotes, no matter what. Are there any cases where it is appropriate for a sentence to end with ".? 
Answer: I was taught that if the quote has more than one sentence, then you do it like this, with a period in and a period out: Statement: I once heard a quote that said "Stop. You can't go. If you go, you can't stop. If you stop, you can't go.". Question: Is there a quote that says "Stop. You can't go. If you go, you can't stop. If you stop, you can't go."? That isn't a real quote, by the way. If it only has a phrase, or if it only has one sentence, then you do it like this: Statement: John said "Get out of here". Question: Did John say "Get out of here"?.

no