Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.

[EX Q]: So an income tax isn't acceptable, but a 35% tax on the PFD is? Perhaps it looks attractive to you because the PFD to you is a bit of extra money, a nice little bonus to give yourself a treat. You have no clue that there are many households, mostly in the Bush, for whom the PFD is a large part of the yearly income. Cutting that income by 35% is going to mean less , food, fuel, clothing, all the little things that Mr. Olsen takes for granted. 

So once again we have a clueless, tone deaf, Republican more than willing to take from the poor to give to the rich.  It's high time for a change.
[EX A]: Yes

[EX Q]: Some of her answers might excite popular prejudice, but if there is any principle of the Constitution that more imperatively calls for attachment than any other it is the principle of free thought—not free thought for those who agree with us but freedom for the thought that we hate.
United States v. Schwimmer, 279 U.S. 644
[EX A]: Yes

[EX Q]: My
Whole issue with this is if the guy had been more aggressive when he knocked the man down and had tried to frisk him or rob or restrain him and found a gun on the man the criminal would have then been armed.  

That would have made the situation even worse.  I really feel this ended up in a lucky situation for all involved and I really don't think anyone should be following this guys example.
[EX A]:
No