Given a document, generate a short title of the document. The title should convey the main idea/event/topic about which the document is being written. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].
--------
Question: HAVANA (Reuters) - With revolutionary leader Fidel Castro dead and his brother Raul vowing to step down as president in 15 months  it will soon be the hour of heir apparent Miguel Diaz-Canel  an advocate for modernizing Cuba's state-run media and abysmal internet access.
 Diaz-Canel  was elevated to the position of first vice-president in 2013  putting  him  next in line for the presidency.
At 56   he  is a relative youngster in the ruling Communist Party's leadership and will need to appeal to younger generations if Cuban communism is to thrive beyond the Castro brothers.
 He  has already established press and internet freedom as signature concerns  a potentially disruptive change in a one-party state that has monopolized the media for nearly 58 years.
Otherwise  however   he  has a much weaker public profile than the Castros and it is not clear what policy changes  he  would push through.
Until now   he  has held to the party line or avoided public comment on key issues such as economic and political reforms or relations with the United States  which were overhauled by Raul Castro and U.S. President Barack Obama over the past two years.
Still  experts say  his  position as heir apparent is solid and that  he  would have to stumble badly for someone else to leapfrog  him  and become the next president in Cuba's arcane system for choosing its leader.
Born after the Castros took power in 1959   Diaz-Canel  is a child of their revolution who rose through the Communist Party by cultivating relationships within the political elite while avoiding the show-boating that ended the careers of other pretenders.
" He  has the advantage of having outlived  his  predecessors (as heir apparent) " Christopher Sabatini  a Cuba expert at Columbia University's School of International and Public Affairs  said on Monday.
 Diaz-Canel  has been careful not to eclipse Raul Castro and is so cautious as to come off as dull and gray   his  public statements largely unmemorable.
" He 's sublimated any ambitions  he  may have had  so the question is what  his  role and power will be among the old guard. Most people try to imagine  him  bridging the new generation and the historic one. That should be challenging " Sabatini said.
That reserved behavior and the government's secretive nature make  Diaz-Canel  largely a mystery to all but Cuba's political elite.
U.S. officials say they know little about  him   and most Cubans outside  his  hometown of Santa Clara know even less.
If  he  does take over in 2018   Diaz-Canel  will be following 59 years of rule by the Castro brothers  one who was gifted with abundant charisma and the other who commanded the absolute respect of top military and political figures.
" He  will be the first civilian president of the revolution and that will require the confidence of the military " said Arturo Lopez Levy  a former political analyst for the Cuban government whose mother taught Diaz-Canel at university.
 Diaz-Canel  chose to pedal.  He  would navigate the provincial capital Santa Clara  vying for space on narrow streets clogged with horse-drawn carts  motorcycle taxis and pedestrians.

Answer: Next in line for Cuba's presidency wants to modernize the country


Question: Ranking House Intelligence Committee member Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.)  fired back at President Donald Trump on Saturday after the president claimed the FISA memo âvindicatesâ him.
How did  Schiff  respond?
In fact   Schiff  claimed the âmost important factâ in the memo was the FBIâs counterintelligence investigation into Trumpâs campaign began in the summer of 2016.
Quite the opposite  Mr. President. The most important fact disclosed in this otherwise shoddy memo was that FBI investigation began July 2016 with your advisor  Papadopoulos  who was secretly discussing stolen Clinton emails with the Russians. [Link] â Adam Schiff (@RepAdamSchiff) February 3  2018
Previously   Schiff  warned of the alleged dangers releasing the memo would have on national security.  His  rhetoric went so far as to claim its release would trigger a âconstitutional crisis.â
 Schiff  and other House Democrats are pushing for a counter-memo they compiled to be released. Their memo allegedly refutes much of the FISA memo  which was compiled by House Intelligence Committee chairman Devin Nunes (R-Calif.) and Rep. Trey Gwody (R-S.C.). Republicans have signaled they believe the  Schiff  memo should be released.

Answer: Dem Rep. Adam Schiff rips Trump after the president claims FISA memo âvindicatesâ him â TheBlaze


Question: … How vitiated Bill Clinton seemed at the last Democratic convention. Some of his appetites  at least  had waned….With a pencil neck and a sagging jacket he clambered gamely onto the stage after Hillary’s acceptance speech and played happily with the red balloons that fell from the ceiling. When the couple repeatedly reminded the crowd of their new status as grandparents it was to suggest very different associations in voters’ minds. …Yet let us not forget the sex crimes of which the younger  stronger Bill Clinton was very credibly accused in the 1990s.  Juanita Broaddrick  reported that when  she  was a volunteer on one of  his  gubernatorial campaigns   she  had arranged to meet  him  in a hotel coffee shop. At the last minute   he  had changed the location to  her  room in the hotel  where  she  says  he  very violently raped  her .  She  said  she  fought against Clinton throughout a rape that left  her  bloodied. At a different Arkansas hotel   he  caught sight of a minor state employee named Paula Jones  and  Jones says   he  sent a couple of state troopers to invite  her  to  his  suite  where  he  exposed  his  penis to  her  and told  her  to kiss it. Kathleen Willey said that she met  him  in the Oval Office for personal and professional advice and that  he  groped  her   rubbed  his  erect penis on  her   and pushed  her  hand to  his  crotch. It was a pattern of behavior; it included an alleged violent assault; the women involved had far more credible evidence than many of the most notorious accusations that have come to light in the past five weeks. But Clinton was not left to the swift and pitiless justice that today’s accused men have experienced. Rather  he was rescued by a surprising force: machine feminism. The movement had by then ossified into a partisan operation and it was willing—eager—to let this friend of the sisterhood enjoy a little droit de seigneur.
A resolution expressing the sense of the Senate that  Juanita Broaddrick  never received a fair hearing for  her  charge of rape against the then-Attorney General of Arkansas William Jefferson Clinton  later President of the United States.
condemns the actions which  Ms. Broaddrick  alleges occurred in Little Rock  Arkansas in 1978 by then-State of Arkansas Attorney General William Jefferson Clinton as unacceptable and outrageous  to be condemned by all people of all races  creeds  and religions; pledges to do everything in its power  including holding public hearings  to probe the underlying causes of this brutal alleged rape by William Jefferson Clinton and an alleged threat to silence the victim by Hillary Rodham Clinton to make sure that the United States does not return to the days when such brutality and violence against women  along with threats to silence them  were deemed acceptable; calls on the Federal Bureau of Investigation  the Department of Justice  the White House  and all other Federal law enforcement agencies to conduct an immediate  full  and fair investigation into all of the facts of the case; calls upon each Senator and every citizen of the United States  in his or her own way  through his or her church  synagogue  mosque  workplace  or social organization  to join in denouncing and getting others to denounce this outrageous alleged rape of a defenseless woman and pledges to join in efforts to bring an end to rape and an end to the fear and hatred which underlie it  and to encourage all Americans to dedicate themselves to ending sexual violence in the United States.
Senators Mitch McConnell  John McCain  Susan Collins  and others like Ted Cruz and Mike Lee have condemned Judge Moore in the strongest terms and have called for his withdrawal from the Senate race. There should be no problem with these Senators and those who agree with them on the House side introducing identical resolutions that promise the American people and  Ms. Broaddrick  that they will at last take a serious look at  her  charges and act to educate the American people that both the Senate and the House will not stand for this kind of behavior as alleged by  Ms. Broaddrick . Or others who accused the Clintons like Paula Jones and Kathleen Willey.
Will this launch a demand from Democrats to do the same to President Trump? Doubtless — and having seen the allegations the American people elected him anyway. Nothing new has emerged since the President took office. The  Broaddrick  allegation on the other hand did not emerge until 1999  and  Broaddrick herself  says that NBC News withheld its explosive  graphic interview with  her  until it was too late to affect the Clinton impeachment trial. Bill Clinton would never be on a ballot with this spectacular charge in the public domain.
Will they do it? Will Moore opponent Doug Jones pledge to support such a resolution investigating the Clintons and the  Broaddrick  rape accusation if elected to the Senate?
But if all of a sudden so many Senators and Congressmen and Congresswomen are racing to microphones to say they are outraged? Then they need to do something about  Juanita Broaddrick  and what happened with the Clintons. To hold one hearing after another about Hollywood’s sex problem. To name names and hold people accountable.
The addition of Ted Cruz and Mike Lee to this fight bodes well for  Juanita Broaddrick  — and finally and at last holding Bill Clinton and Hillary Clinton responsible for their deeds. As even some notable liberals like the Atlantic and MSNBC’s Chris Hayes are finally doing.
The real question now? There is no excuse for this kind of behavior. Period. So where are the McCains and Flakes and other GOP insiders in and out of the Senate and the House in holding to account not just Roy Moore but their friends and fellow Establishment insiders? Will they bring about the Clinton reckoning as the Atlantic asks? Will they finally turn their Senate spotlight on the infamous Ted Kennedy/Chris Dodd “waitress sandwich” and the behavior of their own colleagues? Will these Senators put their time and actions in the Senate where they now say they really stand? Will they finally give  Juanita Broaddrick   her  due?

Answer:
Will the House and Senate Condemn Bill and Hillary Clinton?