We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Input: Consider Input: Sent1: If someone is bad enough to be considered for the death penalty then they must have had sure evidence that they are guilty if they are then they shouldn't deserve the right to live among people they could kill
 Sent2: When they are about to be shot just think what would be happening, some unlucky person would be dealing with the fact that they were going to have to take someone's life.

Output: Not similar


Input: Consider Input: Sent1: You cannot kill somebody just because they've broken into your house, you have to have a well founded fear of harm.
 Sent2: If you chose to kill someone who wasn't endangering your life at the moment you deserve to be killed.

Output: Not similar


Input: Consider Input: Sent1: Many people who support the death penalty are not willing to admit that vengeance plays a role - probably because they would be uncomfortable admiting that.
 Sent2: If they are uncomfortable admitting that vengeance is the underlying reason, then perhaps they should re-think their stance on the death penalty.


Output: Similar