instruction:
In this task, you will be shown a sentence, and you should determine whether it is overruling or non-overruling. In law, an overruling sentence is a statement that nullifies a previous case decision as a precedent by a constitutionally valid statute or a decision by the same or higher ranking court which establishes a different rule on the point of law involved. Classify your answers into overruling or non-overruling
question:
66 in my view, the court of appeals decision in state v. austin, 2013 wi app 96, 349 wis. 2d 744, 836 n.w.2d 833, is on all fours with the facts of the instant case.
answer:
non-overruling


question:
under an estoppel theory, ""[a] nonsignatory is estopped from refusing to comply with an arbitration clause when it receives a 'direct benefit' from a contract containing an arbitration clause.""
answer:
non-overruling


question:
the contrary holding in konstantinidis v. the s.s. tarsus, 196 f. supp. 433 (e.d.n.y. 1961), is disapproved, as are similar intimations in miravalles compania naviera, s.s. v. nissho co., 207 f. supp. 716 (e.d.n.y. 1962) and ships freights inc. v. farr, whitlock co.
answer:

overruling