In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

[EX Q]: Comment: Legislators are worthless as tits on a boat hog!
[EX A]: Sexual-explicit

[EX Q]: Comment: Well, now, up until the last sentence I was willing to consider your point of view.  But you had to inject a racist comment, and that invalidated your entire post as far as I'm concerned. Yes, people who denigrate whites are just as racist as those who commit racial slurs against blacks or Latinos or other people of color.  It is apparent that you don't like whites in Langley ("that is a shame").  So, Mstraub, to you I say:  suck it up, cupcake and soldier on, we're here to stay.
[EX A]: Non-sexual-explicit

[EX Q]: Comment: Misusing the "racist" accusation in inapplicable situations waters down its meaning in real situations. The phrase "empty barrel" says nothing of "race" but speaks to a person's character. Clearly, Frederica Wilson has failed in the test of "character". General Kelly's desciption is apt.
[EX A]:
Non-sexual-explicit