instruction:
The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the vouch-fair strategy, otherwise output No. vouch-fair is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to call out fairness for personal benefit, either when acknowledging a fair deal or when the opponent offers a deal that benefits them. This can be through an explicit call out or can be implied.
question:
Context: 'You have food and water, this is just extra supplies' 'I know but with my condition i may not make it, especially without more water.😮' 'you can make water by boiling water with all that extra firewood you got'
Utterance: 'you said I could have some firewood'
answer:
No


question:
Context: 'Well i do not need the water at all as i have a distiller' 'And I have plenty of food as I'm the only over eater of the group.' 'OK how about 2 firewoods me 2 foods me 1 firewood you 1 food 3 water'
Utterance: 'If I'm only getting 1 firewood let me have 1 extra food then. So you can have the 2 firewoods, plus 1 food. I'll get 1 firewood, 2 foods and 3 waters. You get the most important item so I'm thinking that's fair.'
answer:
Yes


question:
Context: 'I strongly agree and shall we call it a deal now? 🙂' 'Like I said, we are close but I really would feel better with just one of the firewood. I'm afraid of not being able to build a fire. If you really need the firewood, however, then I would take one additional item of EITHER the water or food instead.' 'And like I said, I strongly agree and you can have ONE firewood now. Deal close ?'
Utterance: 'Yes. I think this is a fair deal.'
answer:

Yes