We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

[EX Q]: Sent1: I think the death penalty is one of the several punishment in the law system, we shouldn't consider it like something insane, and moreover it's normal in some countries nowadays.
 Sent2: I cannot compare numbers with other western countries since we are the only one with capital punishment.
[EX A]: Not similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: We must look into why the person raped a child or murdered a father.
 Sent2: One of the many grievances I have is that child rapists don't qualify for the death penalty unless the child that gets raped is also killed.
[EX A]: Not similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: I used to be for the death penalty, however two things made me question my position.
 Sent2: I am not sure, which also begs the question on my support for the death penalty.
[EX A]:
Not similar