We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

[EX Q]: So by you saying tourists are afraid to come to America because they might get shot in one of our cities, implies that gun owners are participating in criminal activities as well.
[EX A]: Valid

[EX Q]: You're saying that the Constitution should be changed and updated to meet the times in any manner that the government believes would be in their best interest, or even repealed outright and entirely.
[EX A]: Valid

[EX Q]: The original common law standard was similar to what still prevails in the U.S. Americans are free to carry articles for their protection, and in 33 states law-abiding citizens may carry concealed guns.
[EX A]:
Valid