We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

Ex Input:
As noted by the 38 States that have appeared in this case as amici supporting petitioners, ���[s]tate and local experimentation with reasonable firearms regulations will continue under the Second Amendment.���

Ex Output:
Valid


Ex Input:
When a person walks into a gun shop with the expressed idea of buying a gun to kill someone - in a premeditatd act - that - is a problem isn't it.

Ex Output:
Valid


Ex Input:
The embraced anti-gun rights interpretation of the 2nd was that it was a provision that had but one function and intent, to protect the "state right" to organize and control their militia from federal interference.

Ex Output:

Valid