In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Input: Consider Input: Comment: Cosby gives Blacks a bad name, no? After reading so many techniques he used with his star celebrity status, he is the BEST rapist I have ever heard of. Wonder if someone will write a crime story about him when more facts come out in the trial. It's going to be a challenger to the OJ Simpson trial. Please do hurry up and start it. I don't want him or I to die of old age too soon. It's going to be a fascinating trial. What I'm curious about are these questions. Were these women given monetary gifts afterwards? Were they looking forward to an adventure of being "raped" by a black man, especially a Hollywood celebrity? But were angry that they fell asleep and missed the fun? Why did they continue to stay if they realized they entered a room full of only well-dressed black men? Were these victims angry because they gave sex thinking they were going to get glamour or well-paying jobs? Prepare yourselves. He may just get ACQUITTED.

Output: Sexual-explicit


Input: Consider Input: Comment: Once I had a HOT boss and I was hopping for some  Sexual harassment .   LOL

Output: Sexual-explicit


Input: Consider Input: Comment: I certainly hope you run for governor, Robin. Bill Walker will be too busy building our Gasline to Nowhere to run again. I agree we should put your plan to a vote if the legislature doesn't BY THE END OF THE SESSION!  Then, it's initiative time!  Audits, audits, audits must be collected on!!!!  Deficit, my ass!  Collect what is ours and screw the CBC. Burch, Chenault, Micciche, Moriarty and their toadys and lackeys can spit into the wind.


Output: Sexual-explicit