Given a paragraph about cooking, and a set of conversational questions and answers about the paragraph, say whether the passage contains sufficient information to answer the follow-up question. Say Yes if it is answerable; otherwise, say No. The paragraph has the prefix 'CONTEXT:'. Each conversation question has a prefix `Q:` followed by the answer prefix `A:`, and the follow-up question has a prefix `FOLLOWUP_Q:`.

Input: Consider Input: CONTEXT: Don't most cake recipes require mixing dry ingredients first? Well, what's been done has been done.The standard professional chef way of getting lumps out of anything is to pass it through a fine strainer. In your case a standard metal pasta strainer should work. Put the strainer over a bowl, pour the batter in and use the back of a large spoon or ladle to gentle press the batter through. The lumps of sugar will be left over and you can just crush them then.Whipping the batter might work the gluten proteins in the flour which will make for a tough chewy texture. Some cakes actually take this into account and others it is bad, so be careful.  <sep>  Q: What can I do with batter that has lumpy sugar in it? A: you can just crush them  Q: I already tried beating it on high speed, but there's still lumps, so how can I smash them all? A: In your case a standard metal pasta strainer should work  Q: Is there a way to prevent this altogether? A: mixing dry ingredients first  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: I usually do that, but are small enough lumps still a concern?

Output: No


Input: Consider Input: CONTEXT: It is is almost impossible for chocolate to mold as it doesn't have any moisture, required for mold growth.There are two types of bloom:Sugar bloom -- wipe the chocolate with a wet finger, it will dissolve.Fat bloom -- wipe the chococolate with a dry finger, it will feel waxy or greasyEither tends to look like a chalky coating, not very thick, definitely not fuzzy (like mold).  <sep>  Q: How can I test if whitish chocolate has bloom or is spoiled? A: Sugar bloom -- wipe the chocolate with a wet finger, it will dissolve  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: How can I tell if its spoiled?

Output: No


Input: Consider Input: CONTEXT: You cooked it at too low a temperature. Sous vide is intended for meat where you want the protein to remain tender. It shouldn't have any sinews. Think chicken breasts, or the long filet along the spine of a pig. This meat gets nicely cooked at 60-65Â°C (depends on the animal), and tough and dry above that. Meat marbled with sinews has to be cooked at a temperature where the sinews (collagen) melt into gelatin. This happens at about 70Â°C at least, and takes hours. Since the muscle fibres are already toughened at that temperature, there is no reason to hold it low; you can put it at full boil in a normal pot and cook it there, you just have to wait long enough. In theory, you could do it in a sous vide bath too, but you won't get any of the benefits sous vide gives to tender meat.  <sep>  Q: My sous vide chicken is tough and stringy - did I cook it too long, or too little? A: You cooked it at too low a temperature  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: What temperature should I cook chicken breast at?


Output: Yes