We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

[EX Q]: Sent1: Not to mention that the death penalty is more costly than simple life in prison in both money and time.
 Sent2: And no one said that life in prision is "much worse" then the death penalty.
[EX A]: Not similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: The thing is, without the death penalty there is absolutely no deterrent from committing heinous crimes.
 Sent2: Death penalty are given to those who have comitted a very serious crime.
[EX A]: Not similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: There is an even smaller chance of an innocent person being sent to prison for the rest of their life, let alone to be convicted of a crime and sent to death.
 Sent2: It is also possible for an innocent person to be sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole, but nobody is making the argument to stop sending people to prison.
[EX A]:
Similar