In this task, you're given a pair of sentences, sentence 1 and sentence 2. Your job is to determine if the two sentences clearly agree/disagree with each other, or if this can't be determined. Indicate your answer as yes or no respectively.

Q: Sentence 1: Since the business case in DOD places very little premium on meeting cost and schedule targets, but a very high premium on performance, programs succeed at the point where sunk costs make it difficult-if not prohibitive-for decision makers to cancel them. Sentence 2: Meeting schedule targets is something the DOD places a high premium on.

A: yes
****
Q: Sentence 1: In recognition of these tensions, LSC has worked diligently since 1995 to convey the expectations of the State Planning Initiative and to establish meaningful partnerships with stakeholders aimed at fostering a new symbiosis between the federal provider and recipients of legal services funding. Sentence 2: The LSC has never worked to convey the expectations of the State Planning Initiative.

A: yes
****
Q: Sentence 1: I only say that it would explain many things such as why Kitchell has not been caught."  Sentence 2: It would explain why he hasn't been captured yet.

A:
yes
****