We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

[Q]: Sent1: I would support any law that target criminals, but I will not support you as long as you target lawfull gun owners.
 Sent2: So if you support every amendment made to the constitution pertaining to guns, than I submit your not to interested in owning a gun.
[A]: Not similar


[Q]: Sent1: If you want to end gun deaths you can eliminate the guns and in the US that saves a lot of lives on paper.
 Sent2: It is just a case of prevention, remove guns being so easily accessible and you then decrease the gun crime and remove the need for guns to defend yourself.
[A]: Not similar


[Q]: Sent1: A law-abiding gun nut who uses their gun in committing a crime, is a criminal, and not law-abiding.
 Sent2: gun control doesent solve anything in fact it makes crime go up because the criminals will always get their guns and your only disarming the law abiding citizens thus making them easy victims from the criminals.
[A]:
Not similar