instruction:
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
question:
"SWAG" stands for Scientific Wild-Assed Guess.  It's what passes for science when the science doesn't truly exist.   

I chose a random date because no one can give an answer to my question whether I suggest a date of tomorrow, 5 years from now, 10 years from now or any other date.  The science to answer that question does not exist!

Nor does the science to answer my second question.  Why should the society write a multi-billion dollar  blank check for something which not only doesn't currently exist but for which a theory hasn't even been developed? 

As an agnostic, I resent your attempt to knock my argument down by labeling my response as 'sinful religious conservatism'.

I am a conservative; I will not pay for a pig in a poke when you can't even tell me the size of the poke or the gender of the pig or anything else about this alleged pig which no one has ever seen.  Try selling me a unicorn; you will get the same response.
answer:
Yes


question:
Anecdotal evidence is not a strong argument. That a few people do well without degrees does not change the fact that the vast majority of dropouts face dismal employment prospects. And besides, nobody is saying the students are stupid. The article and most comments are saying the schools in combination, probably, with many of the parents, and society, are failing the students, because Oregon ranks near the bottom at high school graduation rates and college preparedness. Presumably, the states and nations that are doing better are doing better not because of any genetic difference in their young people, but because of a different set of academic values and standards.
answer:
Yes


question:
Major colleges do because they draw over 50,ooo people per game for many football games and they get huge amounts of TV money.  UAA hockey used to bring in enough to cover their costs and supply some money for other sports as well.   They no longer bring in big money.   On top of that , even with UAA students given free tickets and transportation to many events , around 90 percent don't even attend to support their own school.  The UAA sports budget is around 10. 5 million a year , and they are trying to cut around 1.7 million.  The ski team , track team , and gymnastic's teams should be cut without delay---for starters .  The Shootout should be canceled after this year .    My guess , and it's only a guess---is that all of UAA's sports teams draw around 500 grand total from all ticket sales from all the sports.  Put another way---concerts held at the new sports arena do ten times better than all of UAA's sports teams put together .
answer:

No