Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.

[Q]: The parroted false and inaccurate  mantra that hunters pay for conservation is propaganda steering the imbalance of wildlife management in Alaska and the U.S. 
Here is the revenue breakdown to illuminate truth:
In Alaska, non hunters contribute the lions share of 65% of the Wildlife Conservation funding.   Hunters contribute a minority 35% of this budget.  General funds, federal funds and Pittman Robertson funds are not derived by hunters alone.  No, they are the minority of all these funding sources.  Wildlife conservation is paid by all citizens equally...the majority of citizens do not hunt but they are Alaskan and US citizens paying the majority of the funding to the Wildlife Conservation Division budget.
[A]: Yes


[Q]: Every one needs to keep in mind that most residential subdivisions in Anchorage have lawns that extend to the curb/sidewalk/edge of paving. But this is not the actual boundry between private property and the public right-of-way. Most streets have a right-of-way that is much wider than the road improvements. As such, pet owners need to fully aware of the location of the actual property line in order to keep their pets entirely on their property. I wonder where the shooting in this case actually happened in relation to the actual property line and not just the lawn line? Maybe a surveyor needs to get involved to tell for sure.
[A]: Yes


[Q]: Vets and bikers???? Hmmmm... I fit that description and there is no way could I get onboard with Trump's agenda. This ain't a reality tv show where the host can just blurt out any BS they please. Trump's too egotistical;a narcissist and just flat out unstable to be president of the Unitet States. My way or the highway might work in his boardroom but it won't work in the real world.
[A]:
No