In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Q: Comment: emotional support animal?  what's wrong with the word "pet?"  

horseshit.

A: Obscene
****
Q: Comment: Yes - This is the essence of the case.

1. You have a violent man shooting and brandishing weapons to his family and neighbors
2. The Police were called by someone who knew Babb
3. Babb brandished a weapon in front of Police Officers - and probably threatened them
4. The police shot him
5. Now the family wants to get rich

This is an utter travesty - The police went to this house to deal with a threat, shot a guy who was a threat and NOT surrendering.

Again, I hope this family gets soaked for legal fees.

A: Non-obscene
****
Q: Comment: sorry Carlisle supporter won't support djou.  Carlisle ran on only one issue - to complete rail as planned.  he garnered over 9% of the total votes, so those who voted for him overwhelmingly supported rail as planned.  graduating from punahou and penn shows that one has some intelligence but does not show how smart one is.  trying to be elected while choosing a losing proposition is not smart.  smart people know how to do things in complex situations and Caldwell appears to have it over djou a million times over.

A:
Non-obscene
****