In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence can be inferred from the statement. Incorrect choices change the meaning in important ways or have details that are not mentioned in the statement. Indicate your answer as 1,2, or 3 corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.

Q: Statement: Would it be as unbearably sad if he drank espresso or enjoyed a good bottle of wine? Choices:  1. It's not at all a problem for him to enjoy a bottle of wine.  2. Him drinking espresso wouldn't be terrible for his health. 3. Is it that bad for him to drink espresso or a bottle of wine?

A: 3
****
Q: Statement: He has two law partners, Lori Mannicci and Linda Gardner. Choices:  1. He has known these partners for almost a decade. 2. he has no way of getting into contact with any members in law. 3. He has partners in law.

A: 3
****
Q: Statement: Most of the tools were developed initially for use with Defense department projects, but can also be used with non-Defense systems. Choices:  1. The tools were first developed for use with DOD projects. 2. The tools were developed initially in the 1980s. 3. The tools cannot be used with non-Defense systems.

A:
1
****