We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

Ex Input:
First you tried to link the existence of the second amendment with incidents of criminal deeds.

Ex Output:
Valid


Ex Input:
If guns are more advanced now, then that's all the more reason we should have the right to defend ourselves against them, not less.

Ex Output:
Valid


Ex Input:
So anybody who has a gun for self protection is now dead because they dont have guns, just the criminals.

Ex Output:

Valid