We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

[EX Q]: Sent1: With trials and appeals, one execution can end up costing more than a life sentence by the time the execution is actually carried out.
 Sent2: Life imprisonment without parole is more effective than execution, and it is cheaper.
[EX A]: Not similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: If a person wasn't convicted then they surely wouldn't be murdered by the state.
 Sent2: The government doesn't have the right to take away someone's life, even in the case of murder.
[EX A]: Not similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: The crime rate was higher after the death penalty than before it.
 Sent2: In the time that the death penalty was performed on a regular basis, the crime rate in society was at a lower level.
[EX A]:
Similar