The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.

Context: 'We will likely also need to take water too. Need to be able to wash up.' 'That is fair, I also will need a good bit of firewood to keep warm as the campsite is in a colder area.' 'We dont care much for campfires. Leaves your cloths smelling for days!'
Utterance: 'Alright so I think we can make a fair deal here where we both will be happy 🙂'
No

Context: 'Hello, I would really like more food for my trip. If I can have all the food, and firewood, you can have all the water' 'Oh, that won't really work for me.  I was hoping to get extra food and water for this trip since I need water to take medication and would love the food to plan a special meal.  I'd like say, 2 food, 3 water and 1 firewood' 'I could give you 2 food, if I could have 3 firewood and 2 water'
Utterance: 'Hmm, how about I take 2 food and 2 water and you can have all the firewood?'
No

Context: 'Like i said food is my top priority so i will not do well with less than 2.' 'Then you get two food and no firewood here.😮' 'You mean you can't let up one firewood for me?'
Utterance: 'Not this time, I really need all the firewood and food is a large need for my family of 8. We need the firewood to cook all our meals from the animals we hunt since we are short on food.'

Yes