Categorize the comment on the basis of severe toxicity. If the comment is severely toxic output Yes, otherwise output No.

[EX Q]: So Walker should follow Obama's and others' attempts to illegally directly fund spending like some dictator?  There's a separation of powers between the legislative and executive branch for all the right reasons.  Maybe that's part of the school problem, wave makers come out with a leftist bent on what this country should be, constitution be damned.
[EX A]: Yes

[EX Q]: Someone asked, and yet again racism is at play, if white children should be adopted by white folks. Yeah, why not. But recent events have allowed white people to adopt and take in as foster children, kids of Native parents and there were LONG lines at the DFYS taking advantage. Why? MONEY. When a Native child is placed in a non-Native home, the payment for care doubles. Another add-on is something called "cultural difference" stipend. So white folks got more money to "care" for Native kids than Native people. Money talks, BS walks. Hence the long list of white folks on the rolls. Yeppers.
[EX A]: Yes

[EX Q]: Does she, or any pol for that nmatter believe in the power of individual liberty, or the power of government tyranny ?
[EX A]:
No