Craft one correct answer to the question given in input. To make it more interesting, try to use non-stereotypical language if possible. Make sure your correct answer is reasonably long, consistent with the context, and requires common sense (instead of explicit extraction from the context.) In your answer, use as few words as possible from the given context. Use a response that is uncommon/non-stereotypical, so that it is less predictable. To be less repetitive, please vary your language for each question.

Ex Input:
Context: The truth of the matter is that in life you get more of what you reward , and less of what you punish . And taxing people 's income is the same as punishing their income . When you punish an activity less , you should n't be surprised to see that people voluntarily engage in that activity more often . Want Americans to earn more ?. 
Question: What type of ideology is the narrator showing ?

Ex Output:
They are Republican .


Ex Input:
Context: Almost as it truly was a young girl speaking , steering away from complicated syntax . At the same time though it was easy to hold your attention because everything had a simple basic flow . There was n't anything that strained away from the main idea of telling the story , no random excerpts that branched away from one idea or another . 
Question: How would one review the story told ?

Ex Output:
The subject told it in a simple way .


Ex Input:
Context: When one looks at the rankings of CF for the first four weeks , you see USC in the # 1 spot . In fact , in weeks 3 and 4 they nearly got all of the # 1 votes . WHY ?. 
Question: Why is the narrator down on USC ?

Ex Output:

They feel they are not as good as others.