We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

[EX Q]: Australia, for example, hasn't had one single mass shooting since it passed stricter gun laws over ten years ago.
[EX A]: Valid

[EX Q]: But is the answer to take down the gun free zones...and just allow kids to carry guns to school?
[EX A]: Valid

[EX Q]: However although our constitution needs exceptions (no yelling "fire" in a movie theater, and background checks for guns), no rights in the bill of rights should be outright banned.
[EX A]:
Valid