In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

[Q]: Comment: America is so f**ked.
[A]: Obscene


[Q]: Comment: "It does seem a little hypocritical for Dogwood to be complaining about Kinder Morgan playing a role in the B.C. election through its donations to the BC Liberals, when it is receiving money from the United States to fight for causes aligned with interests there. "
In one case, foreign interests donate money to advocacy groups.
In the other, foreign interests donate money to a political party whose members currently form the provincial government. 
Not even remotely equivalent, Gary, and tf. hardly hypocritical of Dogwood to complain about it.
[A]: Non-obscene


[Q]: Comment: OH MY FREAKING GOD!!!!    " The social safety net is tightly woven and has wide public support."

They are economically strong and they treat people well!!!   WTF is wrong with those people!!! Someone needs to hurry up and tell them they can't do what they are doing!!!  It won't work!!   Furthermore, treating the citizenry well is abuse of a part of the population that wants to see abuse be the norm in society!!   How can we ever be happy if we don't continue to brutalize everything alive for the sake of the ruthless?   

I hope they got a good dose of reality while they were in Alaska.    God help us if people here ever started being that intelligent and decent.   The entire world would go to hell if that happened.
[A]:
Obscene