Given a paragraph about movies, and a set of conversational question answers about the paragraph, generate a relevant question to the topic of the paragraph. The paragraph has the prefix 'CONTEXT:'. Each conversation question has a prefix `Q:` followed by the answer prefix `A:`.

[EX Q]: CONTEXT: You're probably after Pomysłowy Dobromir from the 70s, a dialogue-free Polish cartoon about a boy who lives with his grandfather and a pet bird and always comes up with inventions. I think the episode you're describing is this one, only it's a hand pump, not a faucet:  <sep>  Q: Russian/East-European/Soviet Cartoon show with 3 main characters A: Pomysłowy Dobromir  Q: I used to watch it in 1984. The show is in color. no dialogue, only music and sound effects A: Pomysłowy Dobromir from the 70s 
[EX A]: The characters are: a boy, his grandfather and a bird. And both the boy and his grandfather live in a house with no other member of the family.

[EX Q]: CONTEXT: It basically emotionally connects the viewer to the action or event in question. I guess that viewers these days want to feel as though they're in the thick of the action instead of feeling somewhat isolated from it. The camera lens (or glass in front of the lens) getting dirty tells the viewer that the camera is right up close and that you (as the viewer) are involved in this.  <sep>  Q: Why do you see blood on the camera lens so much in movies now? A: It basically emotionally connects the viewer to the action or event in question  Q: but doesn't it break the suspension of disbelief? A: I guess that viewers these days want to feel as though they're in the thick of the action instead of feeling somewhat isolated from it 
[EX A]: Is it a meta thing to convince the viewer the producers can't control it?

[EX Q]: CONTEXT: I have not seen the movie so I have not seen the tools themselves. However operations which require cutting bone often require tools which might at first glance look like conventional power tools, such as drills. Tools designed for operations are designed to be very controllable in terms of speeds and the cutting implements themselves are made of high quality materials to prevent contamination, and can be autoclaved to be sterilized (using high pressure and temperature) but essentially they are not that far removed from hardware tools. In terms of being awake during surgery. The main reason to anaesthetise a patient in an operation is to prevent the pain and stop any movement which would disturb the operation. The scalp itself has pain receptors but the brain has none, once the work has progressed into the brain itself no pain from that part would be felt, but with a local topical anaesthetic the scalp might not be too painful. One could imagine that you could be awake but not be in much discomfort in a brain operation.  <sep>  Q: Is the brain sequence similar to reality or not? A: operations which require cutting bone often require tools which might at first glance look like conventional power tools, such as drills  Q: How can a person speak during his open brain surgery? A: The scalp itself has pain receptors but the brain has none, once the work has progressed into the brain itself no pain from that part would be felt  Q: How can they perform an operation where hardware tools are used rather than medical instruments? A: Tools designed for operations are designed to be very controllable in terms of speeds and the cutting implements themselves are made of high quality materials to prevent contamination 
[EX A]:
But, is there any similarity between this operation sequence and reality?