instruction:
Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
question:
How can it be that "lawmakers" are packing up their offices and canceling meetings willy nilly - when they have not completed their jobs?  How can it be that these "leaders" are held to such different standards than the rest of us hard working Alaskans?  Our butts would be fired if we did such a half ass job and then just walked away. 

Now they will dither about when and where to meet to settle issues that should have been dealt with straight away, all the while collecting a paycheck and per diem for  NOT getting their job done. 

Shame on them and shame on all of us for letting this Royal Majority who does their business behind closed doors  stay in office.
answer:
Yes


question:
Ten bucks sez she's in one of those groups she labeled. She's just a contrary old bat. She sure gets under folks skin! If she gets paid for the comments she brews, she's a freeking genius! KK, RR, name some more... I had KK blocked on the other game. Life was good and I didn't have to scroll so much.
answer:
No


question:
Line item veto, baby!  Every pet project in Chenault and Meyer's districts. And every committee chair's. And definitely the LIO. Bring the pain home to these spineless politicians. Spank em.
answer:

Yes