In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.

[Q]: Comment: It is called the "law of unintended consequences".....and the real problem is Trump's "populist" views that sound good, are actually counter productive, and the second more important real problem is he has no clue regarding the first problem.  He is shooting from the hip with sound bytes, photo ops, and rhetoric while behind the scenes already beginning to create real havoc.  This and he is a low point in US leadership, in my view.
[A]: Agree


[Q]: Comment: "NAFTA must include gender equality protection, Trudeau says".

And if it doesn't, what's he gonna do about it? Withdraw from NAFTA? We'll only trade with the US if they adjust all their laws to suit Justin? This silliness knows no bounds. This one ranks right up there with changing "right to work" laws in the states.
[A]: Agree


[Q]: Comment: Which "victims" is Munoz referring to?  The victims in both of these rape cases are CHILDREN.  Munoz never in either of her letters once mentioned the children who were raped by their parents and foster parent.  Adding insult to injury, Munoz is only backing away because she's getting the message that law abiding Alaskans with morals are going to take her legislative seat away from her; as it should be.  Too little too late, Munoz.  How dare you back peddle for the wrong reason.  Alaskans should continue pressuring Munoz to resign from the Legislature.  Anything short of that is unacceptable.
[A]:
Agree