Categorize the comment on the basis of toxicity. If the comment is toxic (harmful, malicious, derogatory, threat, insult, identity attck, etc.) output Yes, otherwise output No.

[EX Q]: It's always refreshing to read a well written good story regarding our local law enforcement protecting the citizens.
[EX A]: No

[EX Q]: No more plea bargains. You do the crime, you do the time. And if you let some one talk you into stealing 56 million, then you deserve what you get. How do you let some one convince you to steal that much money? The guy was not that stupid, or do we have dummies for Alaska state and municipal prosecutors?
[EX A]: Yes

[EX Q]: House members do not have to rush to vote on Walker and Co.'s  permanent fund dividend scheme that discourages efforts and removes pressures for further cost-cutting measures to our unsustainable state salaries and budget.

According to an article on today's S&P release that was conveniently timed for next week's House of Reps deliberations to SB 128, "Despite the budget deficit, S&P said Alaska continues to have very strong credit quality due to the large reserves it built up over times when oil prices were high."

As was suggested by another columnist - take the time to do it right during next legislative session.
[EX A]:
No