In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: insult and non-insult. Insult is any lanugage or act that is disrespectful or scornfully abusive.

Input: Consider Input: Comment: Heck Glenn, you deleted the comment I replied to.

I do have a connection to Fiji, but it isn't as if I live there or anything.  However, I have many friends (or at least people who know me) in Savusavu.  I refuse to "search" for Gabbard's "anti-Muslim" bias.  You need to prove it to me.  I have not seen any evidence so far that it is real.  

She is against "Muslim Extremists" but then who isn't.  And the conflict between India and Pakistan hasn't been resolved all these years later.  But there is no way you can convince me that Representative Gabbard's primary goal in life is to destroy Islam.  

Again, Nuance.  The problems of the world are rarely black and white.  (unless you live in Mississippi, but that is a different subject.)

Output: Non-insult


Input: Consider Input: Comment: *99.9999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999%

Output: Non-insult


Input: Consider Input: Comment: This is one of the stupid things anti-gun people say: They list every shooting as a preventable tragedy, even if it is an act of self-defense. Do you ever stop to think that perhaps this is as positive of an outcome as can be? No, then you'd actually have to admit your stance on guns is ignorant.


Output: Insult