We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Ex Input:
The death penalty is not murder, it simply killing humanely and justifiably with a legitimate cause.

Ex Output:
Valid


Ex Input:
Well, you already admitted you can't with your "holding their guns in shaking hand, just waiting to shoot whoever comes through the door" statement.

Ex Output:
Invalid


Ex Input:
Since there are many people sentenced for murder that are actually innocent (~10% who were sentenced to death who were proved innocent in appeal), you would be causing a lot more innocent deaths than you would be saving.

Ex Output:

Valid