In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.

[Q]: Comment: The polls are so full of sh----t - I perfer trump over another corrupt clinton any day of the week and twice on sunday's - canadians are OK with trump winning...
[A]: Agree


[Q]: Comment: Sustainability?
What is sustainable about deforestation?
The amount of useful soil on Canadian land is quite thin, compared to more southern climes. When you take a tree and ship it fifteen hundred miles south, you have also taken the nutrients that built that tree with it.

By sustainable, are you suggesting that Canadian foresters take a tree and leave an equivalent amount of fertilizer? No? Then explain further this "sustainable" thing...
[A]: Disagree


[Q]: Comment: Eliminating tax credits means raising taxes. Revenue tools are taxes. No one is better at spending other people's money than smug leftwing idealists in the Federal Liberals.  Trudeau is a naive idealist who grew up with a silver spoon completely disconnected from the economic realities facing most Canadian families. The Federal Liberals ignorantly believe they are better at spending taxpayer money than the people who actually earn it, they support big government, waste, and leftwing social experiments that waste money and yield nothing in return. Sunny ways, because it's 2016, #whatwouldJustindo, good for you Canada! And the government will run exclusively on "green" energy by 2025, because wind and solar have done wonders for Ontario... good for you Toronto, you deserve each other.
[A]:
Agree