Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.

Input: Consider Input: Intetesting read, now the hundred year history from the miners  when the penninsula was treeless, the skilac glacier was visible from Kenai noted in miners logs and the US Forest Service survey of 1917 indicate constant change as the norm.

Output: No


Input: Consider Input: Ranger, Again thanks for citing the law as it is intended to be a just and good law. "No Exclusive Right or special privilege of fishery shall be created or authorized in the natural waters of the State." Please read this first sentence of the law again Mr. Granger. Now we get to where the ex gov and buddies convoluted themselves rights to our fish. "This section does not restrict the power of the State to limit entry into any fishery for the purpose of resource conservation,..." This means the State can limit entry into a fishery for resource management meaning NO one can fish or ALL can fish. It is greedy and corrupt to out currant and future Alaskans. My great grand kids should be able to fish. And not have to pay or suck up to the owner of the fish that are really public domain.

Output: Yes


Input: Consider Input: Yet you're still free to be bat-shut crazy and make a total ass of yourself on a daily basis. What a country! Go Rhyner go, a legend in his own mind.


Output: Yes