In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.

[Q]: Comment: Paul Heinbecker is a leftist apologist and totally lacking in any sense of balance or believeability.  Just the type of qualifications required for a Liberal patronage posting
[A]: Disagree


[Q]: Comment: The western global elites have thrown everything  they have at Trump. All the hysteria about Russia hackers getting involved with the German election, French election , American election when everybody knows Obama has been spying on Merkel for years.
The McCarthyism hysteria is at a boiling point.The demigod main street media have walked themselves into a corner with a complete empty narrative and no way out. 
Yes Russian are evil for simple being Russian!!!!
The Democrats are devoid of creativity, devoid of ideas, devoid of policy and completely devoid of person magnetism, They literally have nothing but to latch on to the charisma of Putin and a bit of cold war ideology, its all they got!!
[A]: Disagree


[Q]: Comment: This is oh so tiresome. First, no one cares about what Trudeau said about Castro, outside of a few rabid conservatives and the various leadership candidates of the CPC who think they can appeal to that rabid base. The really interesting question here is why these people are so lost in the past that they are fighting and evoking tropes from the Cold War. Don't they know that is over? Second, discussing Castro outside of the historical context is ludicrous. Castro is controversial precisely because he did  a lot of good along with the bad. As far as Latin American dictators go, Castro was one of the better ones  - a man who really did improve life for the great majority of his country's citizens, even as he resisted brutal American oppression. Through the 1960-1980s, Cuba was one of the best places in the region to live - much better than the American-backed vicious right wing dictatorships that slaughtered  their own people. That is what the rest of the world -and Trudeau -remembers.
[A]:
Disagree