In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

Q: Comment: The White House official position is that they're sweeping any and all allegations of sex assault under the rug and deflect to Banghazi and Hillary's e-mails. Trump's twitter posts are not to be disrespected because he is the dictator of America. They've been very clear that they are going to continue witch hunts on Hillary... Look a squirrel... God help us. We have to bend over and get screwed by this administration.

A: Non-identity-attack
****
Q: Comment: Such is the ways in which we have decided as a society as to how we we deal with misfits; those who march to the beat of another drum; those we can "put away" for not following the "norms" that have been established; those who are annoyingly bothersome; those who can't follow the rules; those with some find of deficiencies deemed difficult to handle, etc.  Do we consider these means to be the most effective and successful ways in dealing with these "problems"?  Sure doesn't seem like it, but, we seem to go on our merry way heading in this direction.  How come?

A: Non-identity-attack
****
Q: Comment: The poor Arabs, clearly it's everyone else's fault. Because their own leadership has had no say in the matter. 
Drivel

A:
Identity-attack
****