We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Q: Sent1: The Seventh Circuit described the rationale of those cases as ���defunct�۝ and recognized that they did not consider the question whether the Fourteenth Amendment�۪s Due Process Clause incorporates the Second Amendment right to keep andbear arms.
 Sent2: We therefore hold that the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment incorporates the Second Amend-ment right recognized in Heller.

A: Similar
****
Q: Sent1: NATO, Galileo has claimed that these laws are designed to reduce criminal use of guns (which would have to mean that they target the people, not the guns).
 Sent2: Ok, so are the gun haters claiming the police department are giving the guns criminals use for crime back to the criminals?

A: Not similar
****
Q: Sent1: Basically this would make it illegal to own a firearm - any rifle with a clip or ANY pistol unless:
 Sent2: with regard to the fact that most gun crime is from illegl guns, in that case why not make all guns illegal.

A:
Not similar
****