In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

[Q]: Comment: Astonishing comments on this thread. The C series was a remarkable achievement for a mid sized country like Canada and showed the level of technological expertise in aerospace. Name me any other country in the world apart from the USA that has even come close to this achievement. Airbus is multi country and Embraer is revamping old technology. Why shouldn't Canada play an important role within Airbus?
There will be more jobs in Alabama if the US market opens up but the new company with all its strengths could sell twice as much in the rest of the world where 70% of the market is  bringing more jobs to Canada. If Trump is happy about this deal which considerably strengthens Boeing's only real competitor the he is the fool I always thought he was.
[A]: Non-sexual-explicit


[Q]: Comment: You are truly a pessimist! I know you don't like "Pocahontas" or Chuck Schumer, but either would be a better administrator than Trump, who doesn't seem to be getting the picture. I could be wrong, but I don't think Pence has national appeal.
[A]: Non-sexual-explicit


[Q]: Comment: Another fool too afraid to use his own name in the ridiculous comments he spews.

Having a foolish opinion is one thing.  Not having the courage to stand by it is another thing entirely.
[A]:
Non-sexual-explicit