In this task, you are given text for US Congressional and California state bills, your task is to generate a summary for this bill.

Example Input: SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Aviation Employee Screening and 
Security Enhancement Act of 2017''.

SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS.

    In this Act:
            (1) Administration.--The term ``Administration'' means the 
        Transportation Security Administration.
            (2) Administrator.--The term ``Administrator'' means the 
        Administrator of the Transportation Security Administration.
            (3) Air carrier.--The term ``air carrier'' has the meaning 
        given such term in section 40102 of title 49, United States 
        Code.
            (4) Appropriate congressional committees.--The term 
        ``appropriate congressional committees'' means the Committee on 
        Homeland Security of the House of Representatives and the 
        Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs and the 
        Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the 
        Senate.
            (5) Foreign air carrier.--The term ``foreign air carrier'' 
        has the meaning given such term in section 40102 of title 49, 
        United States Code.
            (6) Intelligence community.--The term ``intelligence 
        community'' has the meaning given such term in section 3(4) of 
        the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 3003(4)).
            (7) Secured area.--The term ``secured area'' has the 
        meaning given such term in section 1540.5 of title 49, Code of 
        Federal Regulations.
            (8) Security identification display area.--The term 
        ``Security Identification Display Area'' has the meaning given 
        such term in section 1540.5 of title 49, Code of Federal 
        Regulations.
            (9) Sterile area.--The term ``sterile area'' has the 
        meaning given such term in section 1540.5 of title 49, Code of 
        Federal Regulations.

SEC. 3. COST AND FEASIBILITY STUDY.

    (a) In General.--Not later than 180 days after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, the Administrator, in consultation with the 
Aviation Security Advisory Committee (established under section 44946 
of title 49, United States Code), shall submit to the appropriate 
congressional committees and the Comptroller General of the United 
States a cost and feasibility study of a statistically significant 
number of Category I, II, III, IV, and X airports assessing the impact 
if all employee access points from non-secured areas to secured areas 
of such airports are comprised of the following:
            (1) A secure door utilizing card and pin entry or biometric 
        technology.
            (2) Surveillance video recording, capable of storing video 
        data for at least 30 days.
            (3) Advanced screening technologies, including at least one 
        of the following:
                    (A) Magnetometer (walk-through or hand-held).
                    (B) Explosives detection canines.
                    (C) Explosives trace detection swabbing.
                    (D) Advanced imaging technology.
                    (E) X-ray bag screening technology.
    (b) Contents.--The study required under subsection (a) shall 
include information related to the employee screening costs of those 
category I, II, III, IV, and X airports which have already implemented 
practices of screening 100 percent of employees accessing secured areas 
of airports, including the following:
            (1) Costs associated with establishing an operational 
        minimum number of employee entry and exit points.
            (2) A comparison of estimated costs and effectiveness 
        associated with implementing the security features specified in 
        subsection (a) to--
                    (A) the Federal Government; and
                    (B) airports and the aviation community.
    (c) Comptroller General Assessment.--
            (1) In general.--Upon completion of the study required 
        under subsection (a), the Comptroller General of the United 
        States shall review such study to assess the quality and 
        reliability of such study.
            (2) Assessment.--Not later than 60 days after the receipt 
        of the study required under subsection (a), the Comptroller 
        General of the United States shall report to the Committee on 
        Homeland Security of the House of Representatives and the 
        Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs and the 
        Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the 
        Senate on the results of the review required under paragraph 
        (1).

SEC. 4. AIRPORT WORKER EDUCATION AND SECURITY AWARENESS.

    (a) Cooperative Efforts to Enhance Airport Security Awareness.--Not 
later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the 
Administrator shall work with air carriers, foreign air carriers, 
airport operators, labor unions representing credentialed employees, 
and the Aviation Security Advisory Committee to enhance security 
awareness of credentialed airport populations regarding insider threats 
to aviation security and best practices related to airport access 
controls.
    (b) Credentialing Standards.--
            (1) In general.--Not later than 180 days after the date of 
        the enactment of this Act, the Administrator shall, in 
        consultation with air carriers, foreign air carriers, airport 
        operators, labor unions representing credentialed employees, 
        and the Aviation Security Advisory Committee, assess 
        credentialing standards, policies, and practices to ensure that 
        insider threats to aviation security are adequately addressed.
            (2) Report.--Not later than 30 days after completion of the 
        assessment required under paragraph (1), the Administrator 
        shall report to the appropriate congressional committees on the 
        results of such assessment.
    (c) SIDA Applications.--
            (1) Social security numbers required.--Not later than 60 
        days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the 
        Administrator shall require airport operators to submit the 
        social security number of an individual applying for a 
        credential granting access to the Security Identification 
        Display Area to strengthen security vetting effectiveness. An 
        applicant who does not provide such applicant's social security 
        number may be denied such a credential.
            (2) Screening notice.--The Administrator shall issue 
        requirements for airport operators to include in applications 
        for access to a Security Identification Display Area a notice 
        informing applicants that an employee holding a credential 
        granting access to a Security Identification Display Area may 
        be screened at any time while gaining access to, working in, or 
        leaving a Security Identification Display Area.

SEC. 5. SECURING AIRPORT WORKER ACCESS.

    (a) In General.--The Administrator shall work with airport 
operators and the Aviation Security Advisory Committee to identify 
advanced technologies, including biometric identification technologies, 
for securing employee access to the secured areas and sterile areas of 
airports.
    (b) Rap Back Vetting.--Not later than 180 days after the date of 
the enactment of this Act, the Administrator shall ensure that all 
credentialed aviation worker populations currently requiring a 
fingerprint-based criminal record history check are continuously vetted 
through the Federal Bureau of Investigation's Rap Back Service, in 
order to more rapidly detect and mitigate insider threats to aviation 
security.
    (c) Insider Threat Education and Mitigation.--Not later than 180 
days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Administrator 
shall identify means of enhancing the Administration's ability to 
leverage the resources of the Department of Homeland Security and the 
intelligence community to educate Administration personnel on insider 
threats to aviation security and how the Administration can better 
mitigate such insider threats.
    (d) Playbook Operations.--The Administrator shall ensure that 
Administration-led employee physical inspection efforts of aviation 
workers, known as Playbook operations, are targeted, strategic, and 
focused on providing the greatest level of security effectiveness.
    (e) Covert Testing.--
            (1) In general.--The Administrator shall conduct covert 
        testing of Administration-led employee inspection operations at 
        airports and measure existing levels of security effectiveness. 
        The Administrator shall provide--
                    (A) the results of such testing to the airport 
                operator for the airport that is the subject of any 
                such testing, and, as appropriate, to air carriers and 
                foreign air carriers that operate at the airport that 
                is the subject of such testing; and
                    (B) recommendations and technical assistance for 
                air carriers, foreign air carriers, and airport 
                operators to conduct their own employee inspections, as 
                needed.
            (2) Annual reporting.--The Administrator shall annually, 
        for each of fiscal years 2018 through 2022, submit to the 
        appropriate congressional committees a report on the frequency, 
        methodology, strategy, and effectiveness of employee inspection 
        operations at airports.
    (f) Centralized Database.--Not later than 180 days after the date 
of the enactment of this Act, the Administrator, in consultation with 
the Aviation Security Advisory Committee, shall--
            (1) establish a national database of individuals who have 
        had either their airport or airport operator-issued badge 
        revoked for failure to comply with aviation security 
        requirements;
            (2) determine the appropriate reporting mechanisms for air 
        carriers, foreign air carriers, and airport operators to--
                    (A) submit to the Administration data regarding 
                individuals described in paragraph (1); and
                    (B) access the database established pursuant to 
                such paragraph; and
            (3) establish a process to allow individuals whose names 
        were mistakenly entered into such database to correct the 
        record and have their names removed from such database.

SEC. 6. INSIDER THREAT COORDINATION EFFORTS.

    The Department of Homeland Security is the lead interagency 
coordinator pertaining to insider threat investigations and mitigation 
efforts at airports. The Department shall make every practicable effort 
to coordinate with other relevant Government entities, as well as the 
security representatives of air carriers, foreign air carriers, and 
airport operators, as appropriate, when undertaking such investigations 
and efforts.

SEC. 7. INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SECURITY.

    Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, 
the Administrator shall submit to the appropriate congressional 
committees a plan to conduct recurring reviews of the operational, 
technical, and management security controls for Administration 
information technology systems at airports.

SEC. 8. NO ADDITIONAL FUNDS AUTHORIZED.

    No additional funds are authorized to carry out the requirements of 
this Act. Such requirements shall be carried out using amounts 
otherwise authorized.

            Passed the House of Representatives April 25, 2017.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
Example Output: Aviation Employee Screening and Security Enhancement Act of 2017 (Sec. 3) This bill directs the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to conduct, and submit to Congress and the Government Accountability Office (GAO), a cost and feasibility study of a statistically significant number of Category I, II, III, IV, and X airports assessing the impact if all airport employee access points from non-secured to secured airport areas are comprised of the following:  a secure door utilizing card and pin entry or biometric technology; surveillance video recording capable of storing video data for at least 30 days; certain advanced screening technologies, including magnetometers, explosives detection canines, explosives trace detection swabbing, advanced imaging technology, and X-ray bag screening technology; and information related to employee screening costs of such airports that have already implemented practices of screening 100% of employees accessing secured areas.  The GAO shall assess the completed study and report the results to Congress. (Sec. 4) The TSA shall:  work with air carriers, foreign air carriers, airport operators, labor unions representing credentialed airport employees, and the TSA's Aviation Security Advisory Committee to enhance security awareness of credentialed airport workers regarding insider threats to aviation security and best practices related to airport access controls; assess credentialing standards, policies, and practices to ensure that insider threats to aviation security are adequately addressed;  require airport operators to submit the social security number of an individual applying for a credential granting access to the Security Identification Display Area of an airport to strengthen security vetting effectiveness; and issue requirements for airport operators to include in applications for access to such area a notice that an employee holding a credential granting such access may be screened at any time while entering, working in, or leaving the area.  (Sec. 5) The TSA shall also:  work with airport operators and the TSA Advisory Committee to identify advanced technologies for securing employee access to secured and sterile airport areas; ensure that credentialed aviation worker populations currently requiring a fingerprint-based criminal record history check are continuously vetted through the Federal Bureau of Investigation's Rap Back Service to mitigate insider threats; identify ways to enhance TSA's ability to educate its personnel on insider threats to aviation security and on how to mitigate such threats; ensure that TSA employee physical inspection efforts of aviation workers (Playbook operations) are focused on providing the greatest level of security effectiveness; conduct covert testing of TSA employee screening operations at airports;  report on the frequency, methodology, strategy, and effectiveness of employee inspection operations at airports; and establish a national database of individuals who have had either their airport or aircraft operator-issued badge revoked for failure to comply with aviation security requirements, as well a process to allow individuals whose names were mistakenly entered into such database to correct the record and have their names removed from it.  (Sec. 6) The DHS is the lead interagency coordinator to insider threat investigations and mitigation efforts at airports. (Sec. 7) The TSA shall submit a plan to conduct recurring reviews of the operational security controls for TSA information technology systems at airports.

Example Input: SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
    This Act may be cited as the ``Johnson-O'Malley Supplemental Indian 
Education Program Modernization Act''.
SEC. 2. INDIAN EDUCATION PROGRAM STUDENT COUNT UPDATE.
    The Act of April 16, 1934 (25 U.S.C. 5342 et seq.) (commonly 
referred to as the Johnson-O'Malley Act) is amended by adding at the 
end the following:
``SEC. 7. COMPUTATION OF STUDENT COUNT.
    ``(a) Definitions.--For the purposes of this Act, the following 
definitions apply:
        ``(1) Contracting party.--The term `contracting party' means an 
    entity that has a contract through a program authorized under this 
    Act.
        ``(2) Eligible entity.--The term `eligible entity' means an 
    entity that is eligible to apply for a contract for a supplemental 
    or operational support program under this Act, as outlined in 
    section 1.
        ``(3) Existing contracting party.--The term `existing 
    contracting party' means a contracting party that has a contract 
    under this Act that is in effect on the date of enactment of the 
    JOM Modernization Act.
        ``(4) JOM modernization act.--The term `JOM Modernization Act' 
    means the Johnson-O'Malley Supplemental Indian Education Program 
    Modernization Act.
        ``(5) New contracting party.--The term `new contracting party' 
    means an entity that enters into a contract under this Act after 
    the date of enactment of the JOM Modernization Act.
        ``(6) Secretary.--The term `Secretary' means the Secretary of 
    the Interior.
    ``(b) Determination of the Number of Eligible Indian Students.--
        ``(1) Initial determinations.--
            ``(A) In general.--The Secretary shall make an initial 
        determination of the number of eligible Indian students served 
        or potentially served by each eligible entity in accordance 
        with subparagraph (B).
            ``(B) Process for making the initial determination.--
                ``(i) Preliminary report.--Not later than 180 days 
            after the date of enactment of the JOM Modernization Act, 
            the Secretary shall publish a preliminary report describing 
            the number of eligible Indian students served or 
            potentially served by each eligible entity, using the most 
            applicable and accurate data (as determined by the 
            Secretary in consultation with eligible entities) from the 
            fiscal year preceding the fiscal year for which the initial 
            determination is to be made from--

                    ``(I) the Bureau of the Census;
                    ``(II) the National Center for Education 
                Statistics; or
                    ``(III) the Office of Indian Education of the 
                Department of Education.

                ``(ii) Data reconciliation.--To improve the accuracy of 
            the preliminary report described in clause (i) prior to 
            publishing, the Secretary shall reconcile the data 
            described in the preliminary report with--

                    ``(I) each existing contracting party's data 
                regarding the number of eligible Indian students served 
                by the existing contracting party for the fiscal year 
                preceding the fiscal year for which the initial 
                determination is made; and
                    ``(II) identifiable tribal enrollment information.

                ``(iii) Comment period.--After publishing the 
            preliminary report under clause (i) in accordance with 
            clause (ii), the Secretary shall establish a 60-day comment 
            period to gain feedback about the preliminary report from 
            eligible entities, which the Secretary shall take into 
            consideration in preparing the final report described in 
            clause (iv).
                ``(iv) Final report.--Not later than 120 days after 
            concluding the consultation described in clause (iii), the 
            Secretary shall publish a final report on the initial 
            determination of the number of eligible Indian students 
            served or potentially served by each eligible entity, 
            including justification for not including any feedback 
            gained during such consultation, if applicable.
        ``(2) Subsequent academic years.--For each academic year 
    following the fiscal year for which an initial determination is 
    made under paragraph (1) to determine the number of eligible Indian 
    students served or potentially served by a contracting party, the 
    Secretary shall determine the number of eligible Indian students 
    served by the contracting party based on the reported eligible 
    Indian student count numbers identified through the reporting 
    process described in subsection (c).
    ``(c) Contracting Party Student Count Reporting Compliance.--
        ``(1) In general.--For each academic year following the fiscal 
    year for which an initial determination is made under subsection 
    (b) to determine the number of eligible Indian students served or 
    potentially served by a contracting party, the contracting party 
    shall submit to the Secretary a report describing the number of 
    eligible Indian students who were served using amounts allocated to 
    such party under this Act during the previous fiscal year. The 
    report shall also include an accounting of the amounts and purposes 
    for which the contract funds were expended.
        ``(2) Failure to comply.--A contracting party that fails to 
    submit a report under paragraph (1) shall receive no amounts under 
    this Act for the fiscal year following the academic year for which 
    the report should have been submitted.
        ``(3) Notice.--The Secretary shall provide contracting parties 
    with timely information relating to--
            ``(A) initial and final reporting deadlines; and
            ``(B) the consequences of failure to comply outlined in 
        paragraph (2).
        ``(4) Technical assistance.--The Secretary, acting through the 
    Director of the Bureau of Indian Education, shall provide technical 
    assistance and training on compliance with the reporting 
    requirements of this subsection to contracting parties.
    ``(d) Annual Report.--
        ``(1) In general.--The Secretary shall prepare an annual 
    report, including the most recent determination of the number of 
    eligible Indian students served by each contracting party, 
    recommendations on appropriate funding levels for the program based 
    on such determination, and an assessment of the contracts under 
    this Act that the Secretary--
            ``(A) may include in the budget request of the Department 
        of the Interior for each fiscal year;
            ``(B) shall submit to--
                ``(i) the Committee on Indian Affairs of the Senate;
                ``(ii) the Subcommittee on Interior, Environment, and 
            Related Agencies of the Committee on Appropriations of the 
            Senate;
                ``(iii) the Committee on Education and the Workforce of 
            the House of Representatives; and
                ``(iv) the Subcommittee on Interior, Environment, and 
            Related Agencies of the Committee on Appropriations of the 
            House of Representatives; and
            ``(C) shall make publicly available.
        ``(2) Manner of preparation.--The Secretary shall prepare the 
    report under paragraph (1) in a manner so as to prevent or minimize 
    new administrative burdens on contracting parties receiving funds 
    under this Act.
    ``(e) Hold Harmless.--
        ``(1) Initial hold harmless.--
            ``(A) In general.--Except as provided under subparagraph 
        (B) and subject to subparagraphs (C) and (D), for a fiscal 
        year, an existing contracting party shall not receive an amount 
        under this Act that is less than the amount that such existing 
        contracting party received under this Act for the fiscal year 
        preceding the date of enactment of the JOM Modernization Act.
            ``(B) Exceptions.--
                ``(i) In general.--An existing contracting party shall 
            receive an amount under this Act for a fiscal year that is 
            less than the amount that the existing contracting party 
            received under this Act for the fiscal year preceding the 
            date of enactment of the JOM Modernization Act, if one or 
            more of the following conditions is met:

                    ``(I) Failure to report.--The existing contracting 
                party failed to submit a complete report described in 
                subsection (c) that was most recently due from the date 
                of the determination.
                    ``(II) Violations of contract or law.--The 
                Secretary has found that the existing contracting party 
                has violated the terms of a contract entered into under 
                this Act or has otherwise violated Federal law.
                    ``(III) Student count decrease.--The number of 
                eligible Indian students reported by such existing 
                contracting party under subsection (c) has decreased 
                below the number of eligible Indian students served by 
                the existing contracting party in the fiscal year 
                preceding the date of enactment of the JOM 
                Modernization Act.

                ``(ii) Amount of funding reduction for existing 
            contracting parties reporting decreased student counts.--A 
            reduction in an amount pursuant to clause (i)(III) shall 
            not be done in such a manner that the existing contracting 
            party receives an amount of funding per eligible Indian 
            student that is less than the amount of funding per 
            eligible Indian student such party received for the fiscal 
            year preceding the date of enactment of the JOM 
            Modernization Act.
            ``(C) Ratable reductions in appropriations.--If the funds 
        available under this Act for a fiscal year are insufficient to 
        pay the full amounts that all existing contracting parties are 
        eligible to receive under subparagraph (A) for the fiscal year, 
        the Secretary shall ratably reduce those amounts for the fiscal 
        year.
            ``(D) Sunset.--This paragraph shall cease to be effective 4 
        years after the date of enactment of the JOM Modernization Act.
        ``(2) Maximum decrease after 4 years.--Beginning 4 years after 
    the date of enactment of the JOM Modernization Act, no contracting 
    party shall receive for a fiscal year more than a 10 percent 
    decrease in funding per eligible Indian student from the previous 
    fiscal year.
    ``(f) Funding Allocation and Reform.--
        ``(1) Funding reform.--The Secretary may make recommendations 
    for legislation to increase the amount of funds available per 
    eligible Indian student through contracts under this Act to equal 
    to or greater than the amount of funds that were available per 
    eligible Indian student through contracts under this Act for fiscal 
    year 1995, and attempt to identify additional sources of funding 
    that do not reallocate existing funds otherwise utilized by Indian 
    students served--
            ``(A) by the Bureau of Indian Education; or
            ``(B) under title VI of the Elementary and Secondary 
        Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.).
        ``(2) Increases in program funding.--
            ``(A) In general.--Subject to subsection (e) and 
        subparagraph (B), for any fiscal year for which the amount 
        appropriated to carry out this Act exceeds the amount 
        appropriated to carry out this Act for the preceding fiscal 
        year, the excess amounts shall--
                ``(i) be allocated only to those contracting parties 
            that did not receive their full per student funding 
            allocation for the previous fiscal year; and
                ``(ii) be allocated first to new contracting parties 
            that did not receive their full per student funding 
            allocation for the previous fiscal year.
            ``(B) Parity in funding.--Subparagraph (A) shall have no 
        effect after the first fiscal year for which each contracting 
        party receives their full per student funding allocation.
    ``(g) Increased Geographical and Tribal Participation in the 
Johnson-O'Malley Supplementary Education Program.--To the maximum 
extent practicable, the Secretary shall consult with Indian tribes and 
contact State educational agencies, local educational agencies, and 
Alaska Native organizations that have not previously entered into a 
contract under this Act--
        ``(1) to determine the interest of the Indian tribes, State 
    educational agencies, local educational agencies, and Alaska Native 
    organizations, in entering into such contracts; and
        ``(2) to share information relating to the process for entering 
    into a contract under this Act.
    ``(h) Rulemaking.--
        ``(1) In general.--Not later than 1 year after the date of 
    enactment of the JOM Modernization Act, the Secretary, acting 
    through the Director of the Bureau of Indian Education, shall 
    undertake and complete a rulemaking process, following the 
    provisions of subchapter II of chapter 5 of title 5, United States 
    Code, to--
            ``(A) determine how the regulatory definition of `eligible 
        Indian student' may be revised to clarify eligibility 
        requirements for contracting parties under this Act;
            ``(B) determine, as necessary, how the funding formula 
        described in section 273.31 of title 25, Code of Federal 
        Regulations (as in effect on the day before the date of 
        enactment of the JOM Modernization Act) may be clarified and 
        revised to ensure full participation of contracting parties and 
        provide clarity on the funding process under this Act; and
            ``(C) otherwise reconcile and modernize the rules to 
        comport with the activities of the contracting parties under 
        this Act as of the date of enactment of the JOM Modernization 
        Act.
        ``(2) Report.--Not later than 30 days after the date the 
    rulemaking under paragraph (1) is complete, the Secretary shall 
    submit a report to Congress describing the results of such 
    rulemaking and necessary recommendations to ensure the full 
    implementation of such rulemaking.
    ``(i) Student Privacy.--The Secretary shall ensure that data is 
collected and each report is prepared under this section in a manner 
that protects the rights of eligible Indian students in accordance with 
section 444 of the General Education Provisions Act (commonly referred 
to as the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act of 1974) (20 U.S.C. 
1232g).
    ``(j) GAO Report.--Not later than 18 months after the final report 
described in subsection (b)(1)(B)(iv) is published, the Comptroller 
General shall--
        ``(1) conduct a review of the implementation of this section 
    during the preceding 2-year period, including any factors 
    impacting--
            ``(A) the accuracy of the determinations of the number of 
        eligible Indian students under this section;
            ``(B) the communication between the Bureau of Indian 
        Education and contracting parties; and
            ``(C) the efforts by the Bureau of Indian Education to 
        ensure accurate and sufficient distribution of funding for 
        Indian students;
        ``(2) submit a report describing the results of the review 
    under paragraph (1) to--
            ``(A) the Committee on Indian Affairs of the Senate;
            ``(B) the Subcommittee on Interior, Environment, and 
        Related Agencies of the Committee on Appropriations of the 
        Senate;
            ``(C) the Subcommittee on Indian, Insular and Alaska Native 
        Affairs of the Committee on Natural Resources of the House of 
        Representatives; and
            ``(D) the Subcommittee on Interior, Environment, and 
        Related Agencies of the Committee on Appropriations of the 
        House of Representatives; and
        ``(3) make such report publicly available.
    ``(k) Effect.--Nothing in this section--
        ``(1) creates a new program or duplicates program activities 
    under this Act; or
        ``(2) replaces or diminishes the effect of regulations to carry 
    out this Act existing on the day before the date of enactment of 
    the JOM Modernization Act, unless expressly provided in this 
    section.''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
Example Output: Johnson-O'Malley Supplemental Indian Education Program Modernization Act This bill requires the Department of the Interior to annually update the count of Indian students eligible for the Johnson-O'Malley Program (JOM Program). The JOM Program awards contracts to tribal organizations, schools, states, and others to support the cultural and academic needs of Indian students. The contract amounts are based on the number of students served. Contracting parties must annually report to Interior on the number of students they serve. If they fail to submit the report, then Interior may not give them program funds for the next fiscal year.  The bill sets forth a process to revise funding allocations provided under the program.  Interior must consult with Indian tribes and state and local education agencies that have not participated in the program to determine their interest in entering into contracts. The Bureau of Indian Education must determine how: (1) the regulatory definition of eligible student may be clarified for contracting parties, and (2) the program funding formula may be updated to ensure the full participation of contracting parties and provide clarity on the funding process.

Example Input: SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``International Insurance Capital 
Standards Accountability Act of 2015''.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

    Congress finds that--
            (1) the Secretary of the Treasury, Board of Governors of 
        the Federal Reserve System, and Director of the Federal 
        Insurance Office shall support increasing transparency at any 
        global insurance or international standard-setting regulatory 
        or supervisory forum in which they participate, including 
        supporting and advocating for greater public observer access to 
        working groups and committee meetings of the International 
        Association of Insurance Supervisors; and
            (2) to the extent that the Secretary of the Treasury, Board 
        of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, and Director of the 
        Federal Insurance Office take a position or reasonably intend 
        to take a position on an insurance proposal by a global 
        insurance regulatory or supervisory forum, the Secretary of the 
        Treasury, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, and 
        Director of the Federal Insurance Office shall achieve 
        consensus positions with State insurance regulators through the 
        National Association of Insurance Commissioners, when they are 
        United States participants in negotiations on insurance issues 
        before the International Association of Insurance Supervisors, 
        Financial Stability Board, or any other international forum of 
        financial regulators or supervisors that considers such issues.

SEC. 3. INSURANCE POLICY ADVISORY COMMITTEE.

    (a) Establishment.--There is established the Insurance Policy 
Advisory Committee on International Capital Standards and Other 
Insurance Issues at the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve 
System.
    (b) Membership.--The Commission shall be composed of not more than 
21 members, all of whom represent a diverse set of expert perspectives 
from the various sectors of the United States insurance industry, 
including life insurance, property and casualty insurance and 
reinsurance, agents and brokers, academics, consumer advocates, or 
experts on issues facing underserved insurance communities and 
consumers.

SEC. 4. REPORTS.

    (a) In General.--
            (1) Reports and testimony by secretary of the treasury and 
        chairman of the federal reserve.--
                    (A) In general.--The Secretary of the Treasury and 
                the Chairman of the Federal Reserve, or their designee, 
                shall submit to the Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs 
                Committee of the Senate, and the Financial Services 
                Committee of the House of Representatives, an annual 
                report and provide annual testimony to the Banking, 
                Housing, and Urban Affairs Committee of the Senate, and 
                the Financial Services Committee of the House of 
                Representatives on the efforts of the Secretary and the 
                Chairman with the National Association of Insurance 
                Commissioners with respect to global insurance 
                regulatory or supervisory forums, including--
                            (i) a description of the insurance 
                        regulatory or supervisory standard-setting 
                        issues under discussion at international 
                        standard-setting bodies, including the 
                        Financial Stability Board and the International 
                        Association of Insurance Supervisors;
                            (ii) a description of the effects that 
                        proposals discussed at international insurance 
                        regulatory or supervisory forums of insurance 
                        could have on consumer and insurance markets in 
                        the United States;
                            (iii) a description of any position taken 
                        by the Secretary of the Treasury, Board of 
                        Governors of the Federal Reserve System, and 
                        Director of the Federal Insurance Office in 
                        international insurance discussions; and
                            (iv) a description of the efforts by the 
                        Secretary of the Treasury, Director of the 
                        Federal Insurance Office, and the Board of 
                        Governors of the Federal Reserve System to 
                        increase transparency at the Financial 
                        Stability Board with respect to insurance 
                        proposals and the International Association of 
                        Insurance Supervisors, including efforts to 
                        provide additional public access to working 
                        groups and committees of the International 
                        Association of Insurance Supervisors.
                    (B) Termination.--This paragraph shall terminate on 
                December 31, 2018.
            (2) Reports and testimony by national association of 
        insurance commissioners.--The National Association of Insurance 
        Commissioners may provide testimony to Congress on the issues 
        described in paragraph (1)(A).
            (3) Joint report by the chairman of the federal reserve and 
        the director of the federal insurance office.--
                    (A) In general.--The Secretary of the Treasury, 
                Chairman of the Federal Reserve, and the Director of 
                the Federal Insurance Office shall, in consultation 
                with the National Association of Insurance 
                Commissioners, complete a study on, and submit to 
                Congress a report on the results of the study, the 
                impact on consumers and markets in the United States 
                before supporting or consenting to the adoption of any 
                key elements in any international insurance proposal or 
                international insurance capital standard.
                    (B) Notice and comment.--
                            (i) Notice.--The Secretary of the Treasury, 
                        Chairman of the Federal Reserve, and the 
                        Director of the Federal Insurance Office shall 
                        provide notice before the date on which 
                        drafting the report is commenced and after the 
                        date on which the draft of the report is 
                        completed.
                            (ii) Opportunity for comment.--There shall 
                        be an opportunity for public comment for a 
                        period beginning on the date on which the 
                        report is submitted under subparagraph (A) and 
                        ending on the date that is 60 days after the 
                        date on which the report is submitted.
                    (C) Review by comptroller general.--The Secretary 
                of the Treasury, Chairman of the Federal Reserve, and 
                the Director of the Federal Insurance Office shall 
                submit to the Comptroller General of the United States 
                the report described in subparagraph (A) for review.
            (4) Report on reduction in transparency.--Not later than 
        180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Chairman 
        of the Federal Reserve and the Secretary of the Treasury, or 
        their designees, shall submit to Congress a report and provide 
        testimony to Congress on the efforts of the Chairman and the 
        Secretary to increase transparency at meetings of the 
        International Association of Insurance Supervisors.
Example Output:
International Insurance Capital Standards Accountability Act of 2015 This bill establishes at the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System the Insurance Policy Advisory Committee on International Capital Standards and Other Insurance Issues, a 21-member committee representing diverse expert perspectives from the U.S. insurance industry (including life insurance, property and casualty insurance and reinsurance, agents and brokers, academics, consumer advocates, or experts on issues facing underserved insurance communities and consumers).  The Secretary of the Treasury and the Board Chairman shall report annually to certain congressional committees on their efforts with the National Association of Insurance Commissioners regarding global insurance regulatory or supervisory forums. The Secretary, the Board Chairman, and the Director of the Federal Insurance Office, before supporting or consenting to the adoption of any key element in any international insurance proposal or international insurance capital standard, must study its impact upon U.S. markets and consumers.  The Secretary and the Board Chairman must also report, as well as testify to Congress on their efforts to increase transparency at meetings of the International Association of Insurance Supervisors.