In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence can be inferred from the statement. Incorrect choices change the meaning in important ways or have details that are not mentioned in the statement. Indicate your answer as 1,2, or 3 corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.

[EX Q]: Statement: This time, they were looking for a candidate who knew how to speak the language of love. Choices:  1. The candidate who loves will be a huge inspiration to all. 2. There is no room for a candidate who knows how to love. 3. The language of love was a quality the candidate should be fluent in.
[EX A]: 3

[EX Q]: Statement: it was it was a marvelous experience because after that then all i had to do was uh follow the instructions you know and do and we did a lot of interesting kinds of things like i would take corn bread and uh cook a pan inside of a pan over a over a camp uh stove and it works real good it's like an oven Choices:  1. To cook the food I just had to follow the instructions. 2. I was not a good experience. 3. The food was delicious.
[EX A]: 1

[EX Q]: Statement: Together, these organizations fought for local rule, which in 1944 resulted in universal voting rights for adults. Choices:  1. The organizations cooperated, but didn't mange to achieve universal voting rights. 2. Universal voting rights for all adults were granted in 1944 due to these organizations. 3. The organizations were formed by groups of activists.
[EX A]:
2