In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.

[EX Q]: Comment: justin will be a deer in the head lights with no clue what is happening.
[EX A]: Disagree

[EX Q]: Comment: I suggest you say that to the media also, he answered her question, she kept pushing, I would of just walked also.  At least he answers questions unlike the full of bull PM.
[EX A]: Disagree

[EX Q]: Comment: I personally admire Bill Morneau.  He seems like he is genuinely trying.  It is just that he, like many others who have never had to start a business or find a job or save for retirement, has no practical experience at what it is to be middle class.  I know many people who make over $100k/year but without pensions.  None are "rich" and all are going to be working a long time because they are still paying off mortgages in their late 40's/early 50's.  Now that they are finally in a place where they are making good money, they are being told they are the problem in the country - they are rich and aren't paying enough taxes.
Meanwhile, the government paid $200k for artwork on the cover of the 2017 budget, which is the federal tax paid by someone who makes $700k/year.  Get rid of wasteful practices instead of more revenue to continue wasteful practices.
[EX A]:
Agree