instruction:
We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.
question:
Sent1: You still have to prove that gun control equals crime control and your admission that it does not is proof that it is about control and dependency on government to protect you when they have no obligation to do so.
 Sent2: Gun control in the U.S. does not equal crime control.
answer:
Not similar


question:
Sent1: Why can a state attach limits "in their own individual RKBA" (such as prohibited concealed carry) that supercede the second amendment- unless the second amendment does not protect concealed carry.
 Sent2: The federal government has NO business dabbling in concealed carry regulation, unless they are going to declare it a protected activity under the second amendment.
answer:
Similar


question:
Sent1: So what happens is they call for more protection, more security, more police, more laws, more protection.
 Sent2: 35) Private citizens don't need a gun for self-protection because the police are there to protect them even though the Supreme Court says the police are not responsible for their protection.
answer:

Not similar