Categorize the comment on the basis of severe toxicity. If the comment is severely toxic output Yes, otherwise output No.

Q: How freaking sad! And totally not in line with an experienced hiker. It was like a fate or something. When Lachesis cuts your cord, that's that.

A: Yes
****
Q: Someone asked, and yet again racism is at play, if white children should be adopted by white folks. Yeah, why not. But recent events have allowed white people to adopt and take in as foster children, kids of Native parents and there were LONG lines at the DFYS taking advantage. Why? MONEY. When a Native child is placed in a non-Native home, the payment for care doubles. Another add-on is something called "cultural difference" stipend. So white folks got more money to "care" for Native kids than Native people. Money talks, BS walks. Hence the long list of white folks on the rolls. Yeppers.

A: Yes
****
Q: This letter provides so many opportunities for humor or other remarks but I do agree on one conclusion. Since the Bucks parked in front of the Jack in the Box dinning room on W11th is out the EWEB building is the last option. But of course with the new and improved city council coming up one of them will come up with a whole new legacy building scheme. Eugene Skinner would more likely shake his head and say my city full of fools.

A:
Yes
****