Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.

[EX Q]: No kidding!
[EX A]: No

[EX Q]: "The most contentious president ever."

You know Don, just because you keep repeating that doesn't make it true.
[EX A]: No

[EX Q]: Best wishes to President Johnsen and regents and most importantly campuses faculty/ staff/ students. President Johnsen said “Lower funding levels will force UA to move much more quickly than it should, which — given UA’s large size, wide geographic distribution, long notice requirements, and complexity of the three university system organization — will force decisions that are less strategic and more focused on areas where savings can be achieved quickly.” I disagree— they got themselves into this. Strategic Pathways is something that should have been ongoing, proactive, and not last- minute reactive. Earlier this week, I talked with a student who couldn’t transfer credits from one campus to another. That’s ridiculous. And inefficient. This system, that's mutated since statehood, needs to become massively more administratively efficient. I think the governor should appoint an outside commission and consider constitutional revision of this expensive inefficient academic enclave.
[EX A]:
No