You are given first 5 messages from a series of message exchanges between 2 persons playing the game of Diplomacy which is an American strategic board game. You need to generate the next message. The message should be generated such that it fits the context seen so far. Avoid the text that is (i) tangent to the context, (ii) repeats the context.

Input: Consider Input: ['Hey England! Looking forward to this game. How are you this afternoon?', 'Hello there. I’m doing well although it’s the evening here on the east coast. Wondering where you stand with France and Russia. Will you bounce Sweden? Has France spoken to you about Belgium?', 'East coast for me too 😴', 'France reached out to me but I haven’t responded', 'Still determining my plans! I haven’t locked in any moves yet. Where do you stand with France?']

Output: We agreed to bounce the channel but they weren’t much more communicative than that


Input: Consider Input: ["Hello there! What's your general plan for this game? My inclination when I play Austria is to piss off as few people as possible, so I don't plan on making any overtly aggressive moves this turn.", "Hey hey!  \nDon't really have much of a plan yet - like you, I generally try not to piss off too many people at the start until I get a feel for the lay of the board, so my general decision at start is really just Mos -> Ukr|StP .  Right now my default inclination is to go Ukr and try to get Rum, that may change as I talk to other players.  Happy to talk about trying to take that with fleet or army depending on how spring goes, and certainly not looking to commit to any particular long-term growth direction right now.  That being said, A/R is one of my favorite duos (R/F is up there too, but I don't think I've ever even seriously tried to pull that off in an online game - that's a FtF option where I know the players 😃 ).  \nI'm assuming standard Galicia bounce right now. happy to discuss other options.", 'Yeah, I was figuring standard Galicia bounce too. Keeps both of us honest.', "So, here's my pitch: I have been on both sides of the deal when Austria, Italy, and Russia decide that everything would be simpler if there wasn't a Turkey. Every time, things have indeed been simpler for A/I/R. So, whaddya think? Wanna simplify our game?", 'I literally just told Italy to go after Turkey first. 😀']

Output: Oh, fwiw, I'd just as well neither of us tried for Galicia this turn, if you don't mind.


Input: Consider Input: ['Salut!\nJust checking in, letting you know the embassy is open, and if you decide to move in a direction I might be able to get involved in, we can probably come to a reasonable arrangement on cooperation.\nBonne journée!', "Hey! I'm pretty flexible. Do you like to open north or against Germany?", "Not especially - depends on how squirrelly the English player comes off in initial negotiations.  So far he's scanning as moderately squirrelly 😃", 'Haha 😂. Moderately squirrelly is pretty accurate.', "Checking back in before the deadline- it's a bit uncertain in the West, and it would be interesting to hear about your read."]


Output: Looks like Italy's gonna head away from you pretty aggressively.  England still strikes me as squirrelly - he says he's super-concerned about Germany, but I'm not sure I'm buying that.