In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

[Q]: Comment: LOL...Begich....what an ass clown...
[A]: Sexual-explicit


[Q]: Comment: Ambassador Stevens would like to try alternate nostril breathing, but he can't.  He's dead.
[A]: Non-sexual-explicit


[Q]: Comment: Sayem, we're reading about his despicable antics in the Globe and Mail today - I'd say that's pretty good self-promotion.  The fact that he "says some stupid things" doesn't take away from that.  The key to his self-promotion is denial - in the face of evidence - that he's a racist.  It's not the only racist group to try that tactic.

I asked you: "Can you give one example of such a successful law suit?" Apparently you can't. 

Instead you ask me to watch his 10-minute Rebel Media youtube vid.  No thanks - this article was more than I wanted to know about him.
[A]:
Non-sexual-explicit