In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Q: Comment: Hogwash Gary - You cannot have your cake and eat it too. That is what I disrespect most about evolutionists, is the hypocrisy. If you are going to live by the sword, you must die by it. At least have the courage to admit and accept it. And why is sexual violence any more unacceptable that violence, the fact is you have no foundation as a Darwinist to condemn anything of this nature. If you are going to travel down this road, then you MUST defend animals we eat, and every other act of "violence" that imposes an outside will upon another being. I can discuss any topic rationally with any person, but hypocrisy is something I will not deal with.

A: Non-sexual-explicit
****
Q: Comment: I'm sorry, but you can't truly know someone based on the limited interaction you have delivering the mail. Hell, I'm on a first name basis with our mail delivery guy who I see nearly every weekday, and we have always exchanged friendly pleasantries. He'd probably say I am a kind spirited guy too. Ask my friends though, and they'll tell ya the truth. I'm kind of a dick.

A: Sexual-explicit
****
Q: Comment: Just remembered the "Potty-Peeper" who hid in the collection tank of a portapotty to peep on women as they relieved themselves at a yoga festival in Boulder several years back... seems like a match made in hell.

A:
Non-sexual-explicit
****