In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine the neutral choice based on your inference from the statement and your commonsense knowledge. The neutral choice is a sentence that neither agrees nor disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3', corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence. If sentence X agrees with sentence Y, one's correctness follows from the other one. If sentence X disagrees with sentence Y, they can not be correct at the same time.
--------
Question: Statement: Why not just abolish all the laws that are supposed to protect These folk; because if you do not have legal services, the laws are unenforceable and useless. Choices: 1. These folk need legal services to protect them. 2. There is no way to enforce the laws with no legal services. 3. The people can protect themselves against the law.

Answer: 1


Question: Statement: Accordingly, sections 203 and 204 of the act, which require agencies to consult with small governments and solicit input from State, local, and tribal governments, are also inapplicable. Choices: 1. Sections two hundred three and two hundred four are inapplicable. 2. Sections five hundred and five hundred one are inapplicable, sections 203 and 204 are fine though. 3. The sections of the act required extensive changes.

Answer: 3


Question: Statement: Amazingly, from elephant-back at the jungle's edge you can see the snowcapped Himalayas, less than 160 km (100 miles) away and looming like a foam-crested wave. Choices: 1. The Himalayas are less than 100 miles away from the jungle's edge. 2. It is possible to see the Himalayas from the ground, but it is much more difficult. 3. To see the Himalayas you must demount your elephant as the high trees obscure your view.

Answer:
2