Craft one correct answer to the question given in input. To make it more interesting, try to use non-stereotypical language if possible. Make sure your correct answer is reasonably long, consistent with the context, and requires common sense (instead of explicit extraction from the context.) In your answer, use as few words as possible from the given context. Use a response that is uncommon/non-stereotypical, so that it is less predictable. To be less repetitive, please vary your language for each question.

Example Input: Context: Apparently the Mother Nature decided the start of spring warranted no more than one day of sunshine , with a graceful showing yesterday , and then today back to cloud . I feel Mother Nature is trying to kill my spirits , unsuccessfully I might add . So the brother and I made the most of it yesterday , spending the day outside , tanning , running around , and just basically running a muck . 
Question: How has the start of Spring been ?
Example Output: Filled with gray .

Example Input: Context: I ' m not of the all too common present belief in disposable consumerism : of buying as cheaply as possible and that when the item is no longer of use , I 'll throw it away and aquire a new one . Properly and sturdily made bakeware , stoneware and cast iron , in particular , will last indefinitely , benefiting from the time and care it takes to season it ( as will anyone willing and thoughtful enough to take that time ) . This makes a lovely moist loaf ( I halved the recipe ) . It browns significantly and has a lovely flavour enhanced with a good smear of butter . 
Question: What would be a top hobby of the narrator ?
Example Output: They seem to like baking .

Example Input: Context: The article is a miserable hack - job . Todd Purdum does n't even pretend to prove anything , but uses the anti - Clinton mystique to let his readers make broad leaps from innocuous trips in planes with rich guys to ... oh , you know , do n't you ? Clinton was right - anyone who would write such a piece of crap - to say nothing of the editors who published it - is a " scumbag " . 
Question: Why does the writer believe that the author of the article is a hack job ?
Example Output:
Because he believes he is accusing Clinton of things without proof .