In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

[Q]: Comment: Who gives a darn about the so called three founding nations. There is blatant bigotry and hypocrisy when that term "founding nations" is used as a smoke screen for racism. My family has been here for well over two hundred years. Does that give me license to discriminate against others? No!  If ratepayer’s referendums were the standard for zoning changes, NIMBYs would stop 90 of all development. In this case the referendum was invoked, because of local resistance (code word for racism) to the development. The referendum was used by weak politicians for cover.
[A]: Obscene


[Q]: Comment: Well you can take that commie crap right back the USSR, comrade!
[A]: Obscene


[Q]: Comment: Oral histories are normally accurate because it is memorized and repeated until it is correct.  My faith is not blind.   There is proof of the flood happening which non-believers like yourself ignore.   All of the Bible can be proven accurate.   Do you also deny Jesus's miracles?   That seems par for the Bible that deny the literal truth of the Bible.
[A]:
Non-obscene