The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the no-need strategy, otherwise output No. no-need is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used when a participant points out that they do not need an item based on personal context such as suggesting that they have ample water to spare. no-need can directly benefit the opponent since it implies that the item is up for grabs.
--------
Question: Context: 'Unfortunately, I have arthritis so being sure to keep warm and the dampness away in the evening, heat is important for me.' 'Ok.  I am worried about animals and bugs so I would prefer 2 firewood.  But I am happy with the 3 food🙂' 'Ok, how about we shift a bit as I hear you on the bugs and animals.  I think I can get by with one firewood and use extra covers and meds.  But, will need plenty of water and some food.  How about I take 1 firewood, 2 water and 2 food.'
Utterance: 'Ok, although I was thinking that I could probably find some firewood, but would prefer more water so I don't get dehydrated and can use it to wash and cook.  How about I take 1 firewood, 2 water, and 1 food'

Answer: Yes


Question: Context: 
Utterance: 'Hello, how are you today?'

Answer: No


Question: Context: 'Good evening, how are you doing today?'
Utterance: 'Welcome to the camping trip Dude!'

Answer:
No