In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

Q: Comment: Mr. Trump repeatedly exposes himself as a crude, crass misogynistic lout.  To note that those are unattractive characteristics in a Presidential candidate doesn't constitute "character assassination."  If you're not bothered by his values, that's your choice.  If you actually share his misogynistic view of women, that's your choice.  

Your defense of Trump is pathetic....the old "hey, everybody does it" sounds like a plea to a Junior High School vice principal.  No, Dun., not everybody is as crude and crass as Donald Trump.  
I know hundreds of men and, over my 74 years I've never been around someone who has made comments like Mr. Trump's.  

He's surrounded by sycophants (that's PC for #@$#kissers) so those comments have been accepted and reinforced.  The man is pathetic....but, that hardly qualifies him to be president.  He's embarrassing enough as a candidate.  It's simply unthinkable that he could be president.

A: Non-identity-attack
****
Q: Comment: Muslims need culling, they breed like mice and won't use birth control.

A: Identity-attack
****
Q: Comment: The Rebel shouldn't have press credentials.

Ezra's longstanding record of lies, defamation, and bigotry has been established by courts and journalism standards organizations.  He's objectively a liar, a bigot, and a bully, and his most recent publication shouldn't have the privilege of being included in the press gallery with real news organizations that adhere to journalistic standards.

Limiting media accreditation to those who adhere to a professional standard is not the same thing as limiting freedom of speech.  He's free to say what he wants either way.

A:
Non-identity-attack
****