Given a document, an entity and its sentiment towards the entity, verify if it is the correct sentiment towards the entity. Answer should be yes or no. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].
--------
Question: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Anthony Rizzo is Positive . Cubs first baseman  Anthony Rizzo  earned one of baseball’s top honors Wednesday night when  he  was named recipient of the Marvin Miller Man of the Year Award.
 Rizzo   28  was honored by  his  fellow players for  his  excellence on and off the field.
 Rizzo   a cancer survivor  was selected for  his  work with the Anthony Rizzo Family Foundation.  Rizzo  is heavily involved in fundraising efforts for research and devoting time to pediatric cancer patients and their families.
 Rizzo  said the $50 000 grant  he  received for winning the award will likely go toward the Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center at the University of Miami — where  he  was treated — and the Joe DiMaggio Children's Hospital in Hollywood  Fla.
"It's an amazing hospital "  Rizzo  said after  his  selection was announced on the Players Choice Awards on the MLB Network. "The money will be put to good use  and it will be put to use right away."
In 2017   Rizzo 's foundation raised more than $4 million to start the Hope 44 program at Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago.  Rizzo  made several visits to the infusion center to raise the spirits of children while they receive chemotherapy treatments.
"A moment can last a lifetime for them seeing a person in a Cubs' jersey "  Rizzo  said. "I try to keep that and remember that at all times."
 Anthony Rizzo  wins Roberto Clemente Award for  his  charitable work »
Anthony Rizzo emotional during a ribbon cutting at Lurie Children's Hospital »

Answer: yes


Question: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Pope Francis Letter is Negative . Well  it’s now happened.  The great scandal of the modern Catholic Church  —  its  tolerance for clergy who abuse children  and  its  laxity when dealing with bishops who themselves tolerated or enabled priest-abusers — now touches directly on  the pope himself .
 It ’s worth laying out the timeline clearly. In 2015  Pope Francis appointed Juan Barros Madrid to the bishopric of Osorno  Chile. The appointment was met with local protests  among Catholics and non-Catholics who believed that Barros was implicated in the crimes of child sexual abuse committed by his friend Father Fernando Karadima  a prominent Chilean churchman who habitually kissed and fondled boys. In the days after the installation of Barros at Osono  Pope Francis told an archbishop that there was “no objective reason at all” to oppose the appointment. The Vatican’s own department governing these matters  the Congregation for Bishops  released a statement saying they had “carefully examined the prelate’s candidature and did not find objective reasons to preclude the appointment.”
In the months following the appointment   Pope Francis  became extremely dismissive of complaints. “Osorno suffers  yes  for silliness ”  the pope  said of the outrage in the media. “Think with your head  and do not be carried away by the noses of the leftists  who are the ones who put this thing together ” he added.
A few weeks ago   Pope Francis ’s visit to Chile was marked by protests  and  the pope  continued  his  extremely brusque dismissal. “The day I see proof against Bishop Barros  then I will talk ” the pontiff said. “There is not a single piece of evidence against  him . It is all slander. Is that clear?”  Francis  said that no victims had come forward to  him . It was apparently this statement that caused Cardinal Sean O’Malley of Boston to scramble down to Chile and meet with the pope. After O’Malley’s intervention  presumably  the pope issued a half-apology  but repeated that the accusations against Barros were “slander” before adding  “I’m convinced he’s innocent.”
And now the news drops. In the time between the pope’s appointment of Barros and his commentary about protesters being carried away by leftists  members of the Vatican’s own Commission for the Protection of Minors gathered to discuss the appointment. They had a representative hand-deliver a letter to Pope Francis  from Carlos Cruz. The letter alleged  in lurid detail  that Barros had personally witnessed the abuse of Cruz at Karadima’s hands. Members of the commission photographed the hand-off of the letter to  the pope   to reassure Cruz that they were doing everything possible to make his cry for justice heard.
The facts as we know them leave us with a few interpretations. 1)  Pope Francis  simply never read the letter  ignoring this extraordinary intervention by the Vatican’s own commission on a matter of public controversy for  his  pontificate. 2)  Francis  read the letter but forgot about it  reverting to  his  original understanding of the case. 3)  Francis  read the letter  but stuck to  his  decision for Barros  committing unintentional or intentional deceptions about the state of  his  knowledge of the accusations. 4)  He  read the letter  but either doubted the accusations in it  or at least found them so unimpressive that  he  did not decide to follow up on them.
The first explanation would mean that  Francis  was culpably ignorant. The second that  he  may lack the mental or moral faculties to competently govern the Catholic Church. The third that  he  is too stubborn or vain to change course in the face of evidence. And the last that  he  has little trust or faith in the Commission on the Protection of Minors to pass on credible counsel to  him . Perhaps more reporting or disclosure will change our understanding  but none of these are satisfactory.

Answer: no


Question: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Chris Christie is Neutral . Story highlights  Chris Christie  finished his second term as governor earlier this month
Prior to serving as governor   Christie  was a US attorney in New Jersey
Washington (CNN)  Former New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie  said Tuesday that President Donald Trump should not meet face-to-face with special counsel Robert Mueller.
"I don't think the President of the United States -- unless there are credible allegations  which I don't believe there are -- should be sitting across from the special counsel. The presidency is different. I don't think they should do that "  Christie  who served as a US attorney for New Jersey for six years prior to becoming governor   told ABC's "Good Morning America."
"Robert Mueller is not someone to be trifled with  " Christie  said. "What I've said all along is that in an investigation like this  there's ... nothing you can do to make it shorter. There are lots of things you can do to make it longer."
 Christie's  comments were quickly criticized by Preet Bharara  an Obama-era US attorney for New York who was ousted from his role by Trump last March.

Answer:
yes