In this task, you're given a statement, and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence clearly disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3' corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.

Statement: This bill, however, is distinguishable because it limits specific representation and does not restrict lawyers in the manner of that representation. Choices:  1. The bill would severely limit specific representation.  2. The bill would not impact lawyers for representation. 3. The bill doesn't change anything for lawyers.
3

Statement: These uncertainties can be reduced by careful consideration of the differences in the health risk or air pollution commodity and the study populations in the underlying economic literature versus the context of benefits conferred by the Clear Skies Act. Choices:  1. There is no way to reduce these uncertainties at this time. 2. Careful observation and studying of health risks by air pollution can help ease uncertainties.  3. The risk of air pollution is the most important type of pollution which should be carefully considered. 
1

Statement: Reviewers call it pretentious and filled with inaccurate references to theoretical physics, Walt Whitman, and the Kabbalah. Choices:  1. Reviewers said everything was correct. 2. Reviewers said it got a lot of things wrong. 3. Reviewers said a lot of the scientific information was outdated or wrong.

1