We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Ex Input:
Sent1: You are against of violence, but have you ever thought that death penalty is also violence?
 Sent2: You can't get much worse than a death penalty.

Ex Output:
Not similar


Ex Input:
Sent1: but yes only in extreme cases, and only if we can prove the person is guilty without a doubt.
 Sent2: I think the death penalty should only be used in extreme cases where the accused is, without a doubt, guilty.

Ex Output:
Similar


Ex Input:
Sent1: It wouldn't shock me if someone committed murder JUST to get those things.
 Sent2: Oh, and by the way, the criteria that I mentioned earlier was enough to kill someone for treason, so why shouldn't it be enough to kill someone for another crime?

Ex Output:

Not similar