In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Ex Input:
Comment: F****** lawyers!

Ex Output:
Obscene


Ex Input:
Comment: If these pipelines are successfully blocked we could be seeing the beginning of the  end for confederation as we know it.  It is not as if those against pipelines are actually acting as if they are concerned about the environment. They still want al the advantages  of oil. The store shelves would be empty without oil.  Then there are those that go home and heat their homes and cook using the dirtiest fuel  called wood and or biomass.  ( it should be BioMESS)

Ex Output:
Non-obscene


Ex Input:
Comment: This is the same government that has committed Canadians to fighting climate change through a carbon tax. They do this knowing that the 200 or so megatons of co2 that they "hope" to reduce will cost the average household 1200 dollars a year by 2022. They also must know that every month in China, Asia, and Africa that they are building over 40 coal fired plants,  which means that in just six weeks all of our efforts for the next 12 years will be erased. That's real arrogance!

Ex Output:

Non-obscene