We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Ex Input:
Sent1: Deterrence is not the only reason I support the death penalty.
 Sent2: Arguments that support the death penalty are the only ones that can reference the Constitution.

Ex Output:
Not similar


Ex Input:
Sent1: So should we be able to impose the sentence of life without parole, all the while understanding that we may have put an innocent man in prison for life?
 Sent2: Back to reality, we convict the wrong person all the time, and we've set up a system where death penalty is actually more expensive than life in prison.

Ex Output:
Not similar


Ex Input:
Sent1: I think the death penalty should only be used when there is undeniable proof against the suspect.
 Sent2: To summarize, I think the death penalty should be used, but only in extreme cases.

Ex Output:

Similar