We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Input: Consider Input: Sent1: I would support the death penalty IF there was a way to ensure that it would not put innocent people to death.
 Sent2: "We know for a FACT that innocent people have been put to death already"- then give me their names.

Output: Not similar


Input: Consider Input: Sent1: And that killer has help, he has the people that support the death penalty and will give him more appeals, and if found guilty he'll get an easy way out with death, he won't have to suffer.
 Sent2: If we have a death penalty statute on the books, a person is convicted under that statute, his ONE appeal fails...he should die.

Output: Not similar


Input: Consider Input: Sent1: ...and if I do someday murder someone, I should be killed.
 Sent2: But I can't get past the fact that they'll be killed for killing someone else - it's hypocritical.


Output: Not similar