In this task, you are given the abstract of a research paper. Your task is to generate a summary of this abstract. Your summary should not be very short, but it's better if it's not more than 30 words.
--------
Question: Since deep neural networks are over-parameterized, they can memorize noisy examples. We address such memorizing issue in the presence of annotation noise. From the fact that deep neural networks cannot generalize neighborhoods of the features acquired via memorization, we hypothesize that noisy examples do not consistently incur small losses on the network under a certain perturbation. Based on this, we propose a novel training method called Learning with Ensemble Consensus (LEC) that prevents overfitting noisy examples by eliminating them using the consensus of an ensemble of perturbed networks. One of the proposed LECs, LTEC outperforms the current state-of-the-art methods on noisy MNIST, CIFAR-10, and CIFAR-100 in an efficient manner.

Answer: This work presents a method of generating and using ensembles effectively to identify noisy examples in the presence of annotation noise. 


Question: In deep learning, performance is strongly affected by the choice of architecture
 and hyperparameters. While there has been extensive work on automatic hyperpa-
 rameter optimization for simple spaces, complex spaces such as the space of deep
 architectures remain largely unexplored. As a result, the choice of architecture is
 done manually by the human expert through a slow trial and error process guided
 mainly by intuition. In this paper we describe a framework for automatically
 designing and training deep models. We propose an extensible and modular lan-
 guage that allows the human expert to compactly represent complex search spaces
 over architectures and their hyperparameters. The resulting search spaces are tree-
 structured and therefore easy to traverse. Models can be automatically compiled to
 computational graphs once values for all hyperparameters have been chosen. We
 can leverage the structure of the search space to introduce different model search
 algorithms, such as random search, Monte Carlo tree search (MCTS), and sequen-
 tial model-based optimization (SMBO). We present experiments comparing the
 different algorithms on CIFAR-10 and show that MCTS and SMBO outperform
 random search. We also present experiments on MNIST, showing that the same
 search space achieves near state-of-the-art performance with a few samples. These
 experiments show that our framework can be used effectively for model discov-
 ery, as it is possible to describe expressive search spaces and discover competitive
 models without much effort from the human expert. Code for our framework and
 experiments has been made publicly available

Answer: We describe a modular and composable language for describing expressive search spaces over architectures and simple model search algorithms applied to these search spaces. 


Question: Recent pretrained sentence encoders achieve state of the art results on language understanding tasks, but does this mean they have implicit knowledge of syntactic structures? We introduce a grammatically annotated development set for the Corpus of Linguistic Acceptability (CoLA; Warstadt et al., 2018), which we use to investigate the grammatical knowledge of three pretrained encoders, including the popular OpenAI Transformer (Radford et al., 2018) and BERT (Devlin et al., 2018). We fine-tune these encoders to do acceptability classification over CoLA and compare the models’ performance on the annotated analysis set. Some phenomena, e.g. modification by adjuncts, are easy to learn for all models, while others, e.g. long-distance movement, are learned effectively only by models with strong overall performance, and others still, e.g. morphological agreement, are hardly learned by any model.

Answer:
We investigate the implicit syntactic knowledge of sentence embeddings using a new analysis set of grammatically annotated sentences with acceptability judgments.