Categorize the comment on the basis of obscenity. If the comment is obscene output Yes, otherwise output No.
--------
Question: The IAAF meet is for the glory and enjoyment of a very select few.  It will have no lasting positive impact on Oregon's or even Eugene's economy.  The sponsors have asked the University to alter its Summer Term so those damn students won't be in the dorms.  They've asked University area landlords to change their 12 month leases to 11 month the year of the meet so the students can be "kicked out" of their apartments for the month of the IAAF meet.  They initially just wanted $25 million of taxpayer dollars.....didn't work. Now they introduced an "end run" to still get the money.  It's hasn't worked exactly like they planned so they're in a "stage three" pout.  

Can they perhaps see the irony in complaining that Portland area legislators are being "selfish" when the proposed IAAF subsidy benefits a small, very select, elite group of individuals and business interests in Eugene, with no benefit statewide.  

Put bluntly.. " Phil and buddies: Fund Your Own Damn Track Meet"

Answer: Yes


Question: I can see why comments taper off when you two guys appear with you comments. Neither of you has the remotest idea what you are talking about. Those damns are a spit in the ocean in terms of the electricity they generate. They were build to electrify the Rogue Valley in the early 20th century and have long outlived their usefulness. As the editorial writer says, the region is awash in surplus hydro from the Columbia River damns since the aluminum industry closed down. The region's utilities has been closing nuclear and fossil fuel plants because they are necessary. Do a bit of homework guys, before shooting off...your comments. You won't sound so foolish.

Answer: Yes


Question: "Islam is a pearl.  A Muslim is an oyster."--old Muslim proverb meaning that a Muslims conduct isn't necessarily in compliance the precepts of the religion he professes.

Answer:
No