In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Q: Comment: The authors of the  JJ report insist that homosexuality played no role in the abuse crisis, but their own data undermine this conclusion. For example, they plainly admit that “81% of the victims [between 1950 and 2002] were male,” and that 78% were post-pubescent.

So if the abusers weren’t pedophiles, and the victims were mostly adolescent males, wouldn’t that make the victimizers homosexuals?

What else could we possibly be talking about if not homosexuality?

Why can't you answer this question?

A: Non-obscene
****
Q: Comment: The real world isn't like being a reality TV show host with a twitter account is it?

Let's hope this kind of absurdity doesn't lead to something devastating like a war because he heard some random crap a talk show host said.

A: Obscene
****
Q: Comment: This guy should have stopped while he only had a murder charge to deal with.  It sounds like he said "fuck it, I might as well go all the way and bring some other people down with me"

A:
Obscene
****