Categorize the comment on the basis of severe toxicity. If the comment is severely toxic output Yes, otherwise output No.

[EX Q]: Jojoba oil seems to be the hot commodity right now. What the hell is a Jojoba? Anybody know?
[EX A]: No

[EX Q]: Yawn.
[EX A]: No

[EX Q]: Maybe.  At least there is accountability for vanity. Nothing that Springfield did just now, including the weird and massively expensive roundabouts project that suddenly is reversing a long held City policy not to confiscate private ownership in Glenwood through immanent domain has any meaningful public input or accountability. The consolidation happening is something that is being fast-tracked and pushed and is not spontaneously occurring from the economics of the situation or the economic good of the city or Glenwood.  And, as a diversion, all this activity and private investment positioning is being fronted by a showcase CLT parking lot that purports to revitalize a timber economy that someone needs to acknowledge is not going to return anytime soon.  At least Kitty Piercy cannot do things like this in a vacuum and I hope Eugene locates its new city hall by "recycling" the EWEB building at the river.  A truly "carbon neutral" choice.
[EX A]:
No