In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: insult and non-insult. Insult is any lanugage or act that is disrespectful or scornfully abusive.

Input: Consider Input: Comment: Former Alaskan? Good riddance! Clinton is a liar, thief, evil, vile, conniving, hateful, disgusting, despicable, foul-mouthed, sexual predator enabling piece of garbage.

Output: Insult


Input: Consider Input: Comment: No, the state should not be helping stupid people go out an visit the place where a complete moron decided to stave himself to death.

Output: Insult


Input: Consider Input: Comment: So it's OK for Native Activists to force Ontario Schools to preface every morning announcement essentially stating that all of Canada is owned by Indigenous people and that everyone else is a squatter? Effectively cultural appropriation is something they get outraged about but propaganda and indoctrination of children is ok?
So why do they force kids to go to 'religious' ceremonies like Smudging, is that not cultural appropriation? 
The hypocrisy shows that this has and always been about money and manufacturing outrage to keep the usual activist groups' palms greased.


Output: Non-insult