In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: insult and non-insult. Insult is any lanugage or act that is disrespectful or scornfully abusive.

[EX Q]: Comment: From HopeRobert earlier:  "The guy is either willfully deceitful or jaw dropping stupid."

This.  And then some.  I can't believe that someone would readily walk into a war zone, one in which Westerners almost automatically get a hostile reaction, with a pregnant wife.

The one thing I will say:  given the level of chaos in Afghanistan, it's entirely possible that he and his family were well treated in one place and actively assaulted in another (and, passed from one group to another over the five years).  And, dazzling level of naiveté or not:  just because you're stupid, it doesn't mean you merit that kind of treatment.

...I truly feel sorry for her....
[EX A]: Insult

[EX Q]: Comment: I have called you "stupid", "dim-witted" and "dull-witted".  

All of them in response to your repeated lies, such as that I called you a "wife abuser" and a "mass murderer."
[EX A]: Insult

[EX Q]: Comment: At the onset of post-apartheid, as per the rules there should be a considerable amount of black work force at the board and management level of all the companies in South Africa. And though Johann had openly promoted this equality move of the post-apartheid government at that time, his utter loathing tendency towards the blacks can be visible by just introspecting the white:black ratio of the employees of his group of companies. At Johann-owned Remgro, 18 of the 22 top and senior managers are white males. At Shoprite owned by Christoffel Wiese, another Stellenbosch mafia, had only two black board members—one female—out of 14. All eight executive directors are white males.
[EX A]:
Non-insult