We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

Does anyone need to tell us what our rights are when they were written to be understood by the simple man and plainly enumerated as rights belonging to the people and without which the Constitution would have never been ratified.
Valid

Law enforcement has no obligation to protect or defend any citizen, not even when a restraining order is in place.
Valid

I am not attacking anyone, I am just pointing out that if there were armed citizens on board, and again, we do not know if there were, they did not use their guns.

Valid