The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.
--------
Question: Context: 'no its not i give you i water i get 1 food and 1 firewood' 'We only have 3 of each to divide up.. so yes, you're going to have to give me one more on an item.. but in exchange I'm giving you 1 more on two different items.  I'm getting 4 items in total, you're getting 5.. - You're essentially netting 11% more 'items' than I am in this deal. ' 'thats the point as you need water so badly'
Utterance: 'Correct.. I do.. but if you're not willing to budge on this where you're still netting more overall value I understand - I'm bummed but I understand.'

Answer: No


Question: Context: 'They sort of need more water for their meds' 'I'm sorry to hear that! But can you spare 1 for me since you probably don't need all the water.' 'Sure that sounds fair. Thank you. Besides water what do you need for your trip?'
Utterance: 'great. Then can you give 2 food instead? We eat a lot and need more to go through the night...'

Answer: Yes


Question: Context: 'Hello!' 'Hello! Yay, we get to camp!' 'Heck yes! I am excited. How about you?'
Utterance: 'I can't wait 🙂 Let's talk about these supplies. I've got hungry mouths to feed, Can I take the food and you can have half the firewood and all the water?'

Answer:
Yes