In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.
--------
Question: Comment: "I understand the difference between gender and sexual preference. A trans person's gender changes, but not necessarily his/her sexual preference. Technically speaking, does a straight man become a gay trans woman because she still likes women?" "Before I transitioned to living as a women I liked women almost but not exclusively. After transition I still am attracted to and both physically and emotionally drawn to women almost exclusively. As a whole and with rare exception men just do nothing for me.
When I was male being attracted to women would be called straight.
Now that I am female being attracted to women would be called lesbian." quoradotcom
OK: so here is it in a nutshell. YOU want equality? YOU want men that become women (an impossibility) to share in the bathroom with your wife/daughters/granddaughters? Enough is enough. Tell the truth. and Stand up, speak out, push back!

Answer: Non-obscene


Question: Comment: That's a nice story, except that it's not true.  I was very surprised when I heard Kershaw wasn't starting.  Like I said, Darvish looked like crap in game 3, and his eyes looked lost.  No way I would have started him in a game 7 with Kershaw available.  And again, the metrics on Darvish vs. the Astros are pretty astounding.  Frankly, I wouldn't even have put Darvish on the roster for the WS, given his history with the Astros.

Answer: Obscene


Question: Comment: It takes an announcement of the team folding before the dispatch writes an article.  Damn complacent newspaper.

Answer:
Obscene