Given a document, an entity and its sentiment towards the entity, verify if it is the correct sentiment towards the entity. Answer should be yes or no. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

Ex Input:
Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Ron Brown is Negative . "I can't teach the book right now " says Shaka Greene  algebra teacher at Ron Brown College Preparatory High School. "Because my students are still learning to add 49 plus 17."
So begins Part 3 — the conclusion of our podcast series: Raising Kings: A Year of Love and Struggle at Ron Brown College Prep.
For Greene  this is the last straw. He announces that he won't be returning for  Ron Brown's  second year because of  his  frustration over "egregiously" low academic expectations.
Curtis and Principal Williams insist that academic progress will come in this dramatically different school  but that no one should expect it so soon  after what is still Ron Brown's first year.
While Greene is the only teacher who says he won't be coming back because of these district policies  every member of the Ron Brown faculty agrees with his opposition.
This debate is not unique to Ron Brown. It has roiled teachers' lounges and principals' offices across the country.
The difficult truth for the passionate educators of Ron Brown is that both sides are right.
This is the last installment of our yearlong reporting project  "Raising Kings  A Year Of Love And Struggle At Ron Brown College Prep."

Ex Output:
yes


Ex Input:
Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Luke Cage is Negative . Netflix just published the new âDefendersâ series  the culmination of several years of work by Marvel Television to get Marvel into prestige serial storytelling. (We have to find a new word for this: we canât call it âTVâ much longer.) The Marvel-Netflix deal now includes two seasons of âDaredevil â and one each of âJessica Jones â âLuke Cage â and âIron Fist.â Thatâs 65 episodes  plus the new eight-episode âDefenders â around 50 minutes each. Thatâs more than 60 hours on screen in the last two years.
Now  you can blame whatâs wrong with âThe Defendersâ on the Marvel shtick: America has no enemies but its own divisions. The heroes inevitably fight each other. That could work if you had writers who understood Americaâs divisions  but itâs disastrous when all youâve got is pettiness and liberal identity politics. âThe Defendersâ does better than any Marvel movie to give you thrilling fights  however. At least Daredevil does;  Luke Cage  is also pretty good; the other two were deficient to begin with and apparently not getting better.
There is a deep argument hidden somewhere in this mess of a story. But to see it develop  the viewer has to ask himself: why is Daredevil so scared of his own heroism  which might lead him to kill people? Heâs a Catholic  of course. And weâre reminded of that in an important scene in a confessional. But whatâs the import of that fact? Why is  Luke Cage  telling a grieving mother  he  learned about the power of prayer from  his  own father?  He âs an heir to MLKâs sacrifice and hope  as we know from  his  own show  but why does that matter here? The evil guys  too: why is their quest for immortality so evil or wrong? We all want to live as long as possible  anyway!
Instead  we get this mess of American social pathologies of individualism and evil ninjas. This is worthless for articulating the fight between two worlds  one dedicated to equality  the other inequality. Maybe future stories will get better. A friend pointed out that thereâs a lot of Christianity in the first season of âLuke Cage â and the second season is supposed to be more serious about civil rights. He also pointed out another sign of hope: civil rights are connected with the Second Amendment.
In my previous essay  I said high-flying civil rights rhetoric collapses in âLuke Cage.â Behold: in an emotional moment mid-season  Luke Cage tells a young black man-turned-criminal about Crispus Attucksâthe first man killed in the Boston Massacre of 1770  and thus  the first martyr of the American Revolution. He was black. We see his legacy exploited by a gangster and a politician  who abuse Harlem while pretending to save it. Unlike Attucks  they always put themselves first  because when they were poor  weak  and needed protection  nobody put them first.
 Luke Cage  takes a shot to the head from that stupid  scared young criminalâbut it makes no dramatic sense  with a literally bulletproof hero.  Luke Cage  is no Crispus Attucks. Our stories fake sacrifice  and thus betray our deepest awareness of our neediness. Thatâs because of our politics and our fear of death.

Ex Output:
no


Ex Input:
Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Jane is Neutral . Jane *  who is in  her  late thirties and from the West Midlands  got an admission from staff at Coventry family court that the disclosure of  her  address to  her  abusive ex-partner last month was an administrative oversight.
âIt took 24 hours before they admitted they had given him my address "  she  said. "They said  âActually  it was the same paperwork  and yes  heâs got it. Itâs an oversight on our part and we should have marked it out.â
In police interviews  Jane âs ex-partner said  he  didnât know where  she  was living  and until the court sent out the paperwork  he  had no firm idea  she  still resided in the area.
âAnd speaking to Warwickshire police  this is the second time that Coventry [family court] have done this in eight weeks "  she  said. "So Iâm not an isolated case  and it would seem that they havenât learned anything."
 Jane  split from  her  partner in 2015 after a year together.  The NMO Jane  then obtained expired on 20 August this year and  she  went back to court to get an extension late last month  when  her  address was exposed.
But it hasnât been a straightforward process.  She  said  her  ex-partner repeatedly evaded the court bailiffs who turned up to his door to serve the order.
âHeâs got cameras so he would then ring them up and tell them what they were wearing â heâd say the paperwork had been sent but he wasnât prepared to accept it â  Jane  said.
 Jane  hired a barrister â  she  qualified for limited legal aid â to avoid  her  abuser cross-examining  her  in court.
âI wasnât in a state to be cross-examined by the perpetrator â thereâs no way I could have dealt with that "  she  said. "Itâs barbaric. Itâs really difficult because youâre stuck between a rock and a hard place. Iâm lucky because I havenât got children involved  but it is a nightmare."
Before  she  left  her  relationship   Jane  had for some years been campaigning to improve the rights of domestic violence survivors.  She  has an ongoing dialogue with MPs and has a meeting scheduled with the Home Office officials to discuss potential changes to the system.

Ex Output:

yes