In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

[Q]: Comment: So who is going to be put in charge of waking up the homeless and having them tear down their tents? Parking lot attendants? The police? How long is it going to take until homeless advocates go in there with cameras recording the homeless getting waken up and being told to move out, then complain about how inhumane it is to force them to move? Who is going to front the insurance claims when peoples' vehicles inevitably get broken into? The city (*cough* taxpayers *cough*)? Or will they just deny that it was due to the homeless camp they created and it was just a "random act"? Where are these people going to go to the bathroom? Where are their dogs going to go to the bathroom? They already defecate all up in the stairwells, this will just make it much worse. Is the city going to spend the extra money for custodial cleaning of all the stairwells every morning so commuters paying to park don't have to avoid piss and crap on their way to work?
[A]: Non-sexual-explicit


[Q]: Comment: I am not assuming that she is lying or that she is telling the truth.  A photo shows a hand behind her it does not show it on her ass and it certainly doesn't show it on her bare ass... In fact it shows the opposite as the skirt would most definitely look different than it does if the back of it were being lifted AND he would have to be a freaking contortionist to touch a bare ass from that 'position' of his arm without lifting the skirt.  So I find Swifts claim of grabbing her 'bare ass' to be not only not credible but ludicrous.  And since 100% of the testimony wasn't that anyone else saw it but that Taylor Swift 'SAID' that it happened, well thats not enough evidence to do anything.  Now if she said that he grabbed her ass and not insisted that he grabbed her bare ass.. well then she has a more credible story at that point. IF that were the claim then I think she has at least a 50/50 chance of winning as it is she has 0.  Neither of these two deserve anything special.
[A]: Sexual-explicit


[Q]: Comment: If you added the word 'boobs' after 'moms,' that sentence would take on a fantastic new meaning.
[A]:
Sexual-explicit