In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Q: Comment: "Arson in the second degree 
164.315 
 A person commits the crime of arson in the second degree if:

By knowingly engaging in the manufacture of methamphetamine, the person causes fire or causes an explosion that damages ...Any property of another and the damages to the property exceed $750"

I think we need to add 'hash oil manufacturing' to this Oregon statute.   Too many stoned idiots are out there playing  chemist.

A: Non-sexual-explicit
****
Q: Comment: It's comical reading this, considering that men have been voting with their penises, and for other penises,  for years. You voted for men and men only because you think men are superior. But SUDDENLY you're all upset because people might want to vote for a woman because of her sex. But, the fun part is, you don't have a say in how or why people cast their vote. 

Anyone can vote for Hillary for whatever reasons they want. Aggravates you, doesn't it?? Awwww.

A: Sexual-explicit
****
Q: Comment: Generous seperation packages my ass!  Price, your a joke.  They were anything but generous.
Here's hoping when the mill re-opens that the laid off Nippon workers are able to get their jobs back when they reapply.  Good luck to McKinley!!!

A:
Sexual-explicit
****