The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the no-need strategy, otherwise output No. no-need is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used when a participant points out that they do not need an item based on personal context such as suggesting that they have ample water to spare. no-need can directly benefit the opponent since it implies that the item is up for grabs.
--------
Question: Context: 'Hi, 🙂 It's nice to meet you as well: I also hope we can work something out: Food is my excess trip priority, What is yours?' 'Mine is firewood with second being food.' 'I'm definitely willing to give up some food for some firewood: That seems like a place where we can come to an arrangement: Would you like to make an opening offer? '
Utterance: 'Sure!  I figure I can go with little water as we can get it from the stream and boil it.  So for water I would be willing to give you 2 packages.  Would that be fair?'

Answer: Yes


Question: Context: 'I would like water more than food. ' 'How many wood do you think you need?' 'I would like 2 of the firewood. What do you think? '
Utterance: 'I don't need wood as I am usually warm so I think we can work out a deal. I like to have more water and I usually get thirsty.'

Answer: Yes


Question: Context: 'I need more food since I have a huge family. Can you give me all food i give you all water?' 'i need a little more food because i forgot that we where staying longer and i forgot some of my food. Can i give you 1 food package please? '
Utterance: 'Food is what I need most. I can not survive with less than 2 food'

Answer:
No