The input contains a debate topic, an argument on the topic and a keypoint, separated by "<sep>". Your task is to answer if the keypoint matches the argument and summarizes exactly what the argument means, in the context of the given topic.

[EX Q]: Topic: We should abolish intellectual property rights<sep>Argument: It is only fair that a person or company that created something should have protections against those that want to make money off of another's hard work.<sep>Keypoint: People, or a business, own their innovations and should be able to be compensated for their endeavour
[EX A]: True

[EX Q]: Topic: We should ban the use of child actors<sep>Argument: Child actors are exposed to too much of an adult world and are at a greater risk of being exposed to drugs and drink. many former child actors have ended up as addicts because of this.<sep>Keypoint: Being a performer harms the child's education
[EX A]: False

[EX Q]: Topic: We should abolish intellectual property rights<sep>Argument: Intellectual property rights mean that it is too expensive to access literature and music. abolishing these rights would make art more accessible to all.<sep>Keypoint: Intellectual property restricts access to important information/products
[EX A]:
True