The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the vouch-fair strategy, otherwise output No. vouch-fair is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to call out fairness for personal benefit, either when acknowledging a fair deal or when the opponent offers a deal that benefits them. This can be through an explicit call out or can be implied.

[EX Q]: Context: 'Of course. So, what about food? I will definitely need the food. I have a big family, and we all need to eat. I can't have people starving. Can I take all of the food?' 'Okay I accept that.' 'Wonderful. And what about the firewood? I would like 2 firewood, and I can give you 1 firewood. Will you accept that?'
Utterance: 'Okay I accept your deal.'
[EX A]: No

[EX Q]: Context: '😮 Food is #1 for me as well! What a pickle. My #2 is Firewood and my #3 is Water. We can split the Food and divided the Firewood and Food based on how important they are to us.' 'True we can , I'd be willing to just take one of the foods if you'd be willing to do that ? Then we can decide on the others ' '🙂v it sound's like we're on the right track! I'll gladly take 2 Food. How would you feel about taking all of the Water, while I take all of the Firewood?'
Utterance: 'Not really liking that , but I'd be willing to split the water with you if I could take 2 of those 🙂'
[EX A]: Yes

[EX Q]: Context: 'Ok, well if I can have 3 packages of firewood, 1 water and 1 food, you can have 2 packages of food and 2 waters. Does that sound good?' 'I like that deal. ' 'Sounds good.🙂'
Utterance: 'I think this would be a good even split of resources and would allow each of us to have extra supplies. 🙂'
[EX A]:
Yes