We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

[Q]: Sent1: We need to halt the death penalty before anyone else gets unjustly sentenced, then fix the problems (if that is even possible), and then, when we have safeguards in place, reinstitute it.
 Sent2: What we need are harsher sentences including the death penalty.
[A]: Not similar


[Q]: Sent1: >>>If we are sure they raped & killed those innocent children then we should let them die.
 Sent2: (Assault would not be one of them unless it caused death or was a sexual assault on a child.)
[A]: Not similar


[Q]: Sent1: No one asks a murderer if killing a person for wearing pink feels like killing a person that has killed another... It may be equally as justified.
 Sent2: killing a person, no matter the reason, is still murder.
[A]:
Similar