In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Comment: That there is a very serious- not to mention very racist- anti- white movement in western society today is undeniable. Mere months ago there was a BLM anti-Trump, pro-immigration protest in down town Toronto where the leaders of that march called for the armed take over of Quebec and the armed seizure of arable lands all across Canada by non-white people. Check it out, the video is there to see. Its the same one where they called Justin Trudeau of all people a "white supremacist". Go figure haha. Very easy indeed.
Non-obscene

Comment: The University, for whatever, reason decided to terminate Mr. Walls' contract.  It was an amazingly "one-sided" document..ostensibly written for four years....but, with a "without cause" clause which allowed the University to terminate it with only one month's notice.  The administration exercised that legal right and terminated Mr. Walls with no stated "cause".....that was perfectly legal...however "unfair" it might seem.  On the other hand, perhaps they did have "cause" but chose to "take the easy way out" and not go through the hassle of proving any justification for his termination.  They experienced considerable "blowback" because of their actions and, it seems, decided to "buy off" Mr. Walls for $90K...."here that this damn money and go away!"  The whole fiasco reflects very badly on the administration...these guys make too much money to be so horribly incompetent...Gary Crum
Obscene

Comment: this is how ak will be like crappy california. a communist liberal shit hole.

Obscene