In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Q: Comment: Astonishing comments on this thread. The C series was a remarkable achievement for a mid sized country like Canada and showed the level of technological expertise in aerospace. Name me any other country in the world apart from the USA that has even come close to this achievement. Airbus is multi country and Embraer is revamping old technology. Why shouldn't Canada play an important role within Airbus?
There will be more jobs in Alabama if the US market opens up but the new company with all its strengths could sell twice as much in the rest of the world where 70% of the market is  bringing more jobs to Canada. If Trump is happy about this deal which considerably strengthens Boeing's only real competitor the he is the fool I always thought he was.

A: Non-sexual-explicit
****
Q: Comment: Yes, whatever precedent or wording or function that can be found, to remove Meredith from the Senate - a man few Canadians consider worthy of dignity or respect. Men like him, with financial power and connections, who groom teen aged girls for sex, are a dime a dozen in Canada. The Senate risks wide perception of total uselessness if Meredith remains.

A: Non-sexual-explicit
****
Q: Comment: Heard him speak at the Manoa Be Ready meeting the other week.  Very no nonsense person.  Honest answers to community's questions.  Not a politician or a bureaucrat, thank god.  Best answer to what happens if the North Koreans send a nuclear missile to Hawaii?  He said, "If it is a hydrogen bomb, bend over and kiss your ass goodbye! If is an atomic bomb, it is survivable."

A:
Sexual-explicit
****