We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

Q: However although our constitution needs exceptions (no yelling "fire" in a movie theater, and background checks for guns), no rights in the bill of rights should be outright banned.

A: Valid
****
Q: The purpose was to demonize legitimate gun owners and gun shows, gun dealers and the entire pro rights community.

A: Valid
****
Q: Right now we have the worst of both strategies, gun laws are restrictive enough that not many criminals are being stopped by citizens; they are permissive enough that low level criminals may still own a gun legally.

A:
Valid
****