In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: insult and non-insult. Insult is any lanugage or act that is disrespectful or scornfully abusive.

Example Input: Comment: I actually like his music, and not against him being Gay, but it's like majority of those in the entertainment industry.........he didn't want to come out early in his career because the bottom line was "MONEY!"  He didn't want to be black balled or labeled.
Example Output: Non-insult

Example Input: Comment: Just so you know, if you're government issued ID say's you're female but you present as male you're not allowed to board a plane in Canada.
Example Output: Non-insult

Example Input: Comment: The thing that gets me on this is that the state talks about the "changes" in what the feds are allowing. The changes were that they will not allow the practices that the state just CHANGED to allow. It's disingenuous to imply that the feds are just now trying to stop these practices when they were previously not allowed by the state. We've got a twisted system when the only priority of the state of Alaska is to kill preadators in the most efficient way possible under the guise of subsistance. Alaska should not be managed as a game farm. Before the feds put these new regs in place they held public hearings and took public comment. The input supported the restrictions on these certain practices.

Another big waste of money suit by the state. Money we don't have. Dissapointed in Walker.
Example Output:
Non-insult