In this task, you're given a statement, and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence clearly disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3' corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.

[Q]: Statement: yeah the uh the we were shocked two mornings ago with uh the news that a forty year old man had sold his three year old son for forty dollars worth of crack Choices:  1. We were shocked with the news about a man selling his son for crack. 2. We had never heard of anyone selling their own child for some drugs. 3. We found it normal that adults could sell their children for drugs.
[A]: 3


[Q]: Statement: We cannot adjust for all benefits transfer considerations, however, thus introducing additional uncertainty into our estimates. Choices:  1. This is due to unknown fees with transferring benefits.  2. More uncertainty can be estimated for due to the benefits transfer considerations. 3. Since we can speak to all the benefits transfer, there is little uncertainty in our graph.
[A]: 3


[Q]: Statement: The French connection was to begin in 1682 when Rene Robert Cavelier, Sieur de La Salle, claimed for France a huge swath of territory radiating from the Mississippi. Choices:  1.  The French connection was to begin in 1682 starting from an action caused by Rene Robert Cavelier. 2. Had Rene Robert Cavelier not claimed for France, then the connection is thought to have never happened. 3. France had a tiny amount of territory along the Mississippi.
[A]:
3