In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.
--------
Question: Comment: The assertion by self_reliance about unions at United is, of course, ridiculous.  United has had unions for decades and many of those decades included superb service from United.  It is, as always, a crisis of leadership.  When things go bad, organizationally, then it is a leadership issue, pure and simple.

Answer: Non-sexual-explicit


Question: Comment: Jill: Just another note.....the rather infamous incident you reference involved a "he said, she said" sexual assault?/consensual sex? incident involving a young lady and three (now ex-) basketball players.  We could spend hours debating the incident.  However, in all fairness, you should refer to "allegedly GANG RAPED".  I spoke out at the time, and will repeat, the Administation's actions were deplorable and violated every standard for patient/therapist confidentiality.  I very much agree that the U of O has a very self-serving "flexible" standard of privacy.  It's cost them a great deal of money in the past and will cost them a great deal more unless they develop and honor a decent standard of privacy.  regards, Gary Crum

Answer: Sexual-explicit


Question: Comment: Perry's an idiot.

Answer:
Non-sexual-explicit