We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Input: Consider Input: No letting the family or friends of the victim kill the convicted person might be childish revenge.

Output: Valid


Input: Consider Input: Prior to the A-bombs, Japanese citizens began preparing for a massive Allied invasion.

Output: Invalid


Input: Consider Input: But if that one doesn't wash for you, here's another argument against the deterent factor (and I must credit a bunch of wonderful schools debaters from a disadvantaged community in the third world for this):


Output: Valid