TASK DEFINITION: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.
PROBLEM: Comment: And, finally:
.
"We'd be in uncharted territory, that is unarguable."
.
What nonsense.
.
The vast majority of democracies world-wide use PR.  Are you really suggesting Canadians are too dumb to figure it out?
.
Or are you merely suggesting that it only works in countries where the populations once worshipped Odin, Thor, and Freya?
.
Bring on Bugs Bunny, Elmer Fudd, and the Wagnerian opera ...

SOLUTION: Non-obscene

PROBLEM: Comment: Bullshite, I'm beyond getting fed up with the bullshite stance you've taken on Rural Alaska.....

SOLUTION: Obscene

PROBLEM: Comment: I think that the elephant in the room is the foreign cash being sent to the coffers of the Liberals here, in particular money from Red China. The "companies" in this country are basically an attempt at intervening in our democracy and Christy Clark has bought in. She is allowing money from a country where dissent is crushed, protesters and others are sent to "re-education centres" or even executed. This is a country that has spied on us, but se wants to accept their blood money? This is a disgrace. She needs to be punted and the sooner the better.

SOLUTION:
Non-obscene