In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: toxic and non-toxic. Toxicity is defiend as anything that is rude, disrespectful, or unreasonable that would make someone want to leave a converation.

Q: Comment: I think O'Leary is a shallow windbag but dragging this inconsequential bit of titillation is just... pathetic. Who cares? How many years ago did it happen? Has anyone complained. This hyperconcern for every little possible faux pas is getting stupid.

A: Toxic
****
Q: Comment: BRAVO!!!!

A: Non-toxic
****
Q: Comment: As others have pointed out, you could have literally hundreds of cyclists (or thousands of pedestrians) using a roadway before you did as much damage as a single car. The shift wasn't merely a change in volume, but towards a form of transportation that demanded, by its nature, near-exclusive use of the right-of-way; needed unprecedented investments in infrastructure to be viable; and which, as mentioned, resulted in ballooning maintenance costs.

Also, I think you underestimate the volume of traffic before the advent of cars. Congestion was an urban issue long before the Industrial Revolution. Urbanization pre-automobile made it worse. A busy NYC street in 1903, for instance, likely contained more people than could fit on a modern roadway, since single-occupancy vehicles make inefficient use of space.

The bottom line is cars cost the public in unique ways; gas taxes and motor vehicle fees were initiated in a conscious acknowledgment of that. Bikes weren't omitted as an oversight.

A:
Non-toxic
****