We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Example Input: Sent1: They argue that the second amendment allows the people the power of weapons so that if the government intrudes on their rights they can defend themselves.
 Sent2: How can a people defend themselves from the government, unless they are able to maintain the same weapons as the government has?
Example Output: Not similar

Example Input: Sent1: The logic of less guns in law abiding citizens hands means less gun crime is clearly insane.
 Sent2: This should be a clear indicator that legal ownership of guns in no way has increased potential criminality for law abiding citizens.
Example Output: Not similar

Example Input: Sent1: I think it is interesting that gun nuts always claim that when guns are banned people will just use knives instead, yet we find that with guns prohibited there are still only 200 deaths a year from knife like weapons.
 Sent2: If we look at D.C. we can see that people who had registered their guns before the gun ban were allowed to keep their guns after the ban took effect.
Example Output:
Not similar