In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: insult and non-insult. Insult is any lanugage or act that is disrespectful or scornfully abusive.
--------
Question: Comment: #2 happens just as often with the sexes reversed.

Answer: Non-insult


Question: Comment: "As usual, no discussion of policies. Just empty personal criticisms. "

Uhh, are you talking about Trump's speech or this article?

Answer: Non-insult


Question: Comment: Here's the real scoop, people.  

Many, many commenters--and the Loyal Opposition right now (wow: 2nd day in a row!) --talking up a storm about how/when/if/who in America is enraged/upset/shocked/concerned about the Norsat sale initiating a supposed huge breach of security.

Is it true?  Is it false?  Is it real?  Is it fiction?

Here is how we will know: when the Washington Post or NY Times has a front page headline that says something like, "WHITEHOUSE ENRAGED OVER CANADIAN SECURITY BREACH"  or  "CANADIAN GOVT. ENDANGERS U.S. MILITARY SECURITY."

When we see that, we will know that at least:
1. American politicians know about this.
2. The White House administrate/Pentagon got its act together to actually declare something.
3.  Washington takes Norsat deal seriously. 

Now, can we all go back to the important business of:
1. Worrying about hordes of refugees border jumpers endangering our future
2. Wondering if $62 billion is enough/will ever be committed to our own military

Answer:
Non-insult