instruction:
The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.
question:
Context: 'That doesn't seem very fair ☹️. That would be 3 food and 1 firewood for 2 water. That is 4 items exchange for 2.' 'Ok what if I throw in 3 waters in exchange for 3 food and 1 firewood? So it is a 4 - 3 exchange instead.' 'Actually I changed my mind , lets just do 3 food for 3 water?'
Utterance: 'Well that is a little promising but I would really like some firewood as it makes me nice and warm and keeps the camp going 🙂.'
answer:
No


question:
Context: 'Hello' 'Hi there!'
Utterance: 'Im really low in food, is it ok if I get 3 Food, 1 water & 1 firewood? What do you think?'
answer:
No


question:
Context: 'Will you please give me one firewood? I may run out of what i have. Just one.' 'I think I will need all the firewood since you are taking 2 foods. I will need to hunt and cook food from the land meaning I need my fire going all the time.' 'I need one more to light a fire to scare away animals. Please😮'
Utterance: 'Then How about I get two foods, 1 firewood and 1 water?'
answer:

No