In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

[EX Q]: Comment: Without going through the legal channels to change how the pay out is done, this is flat out illegal. 

So instead of local businesses and citizens infusing and stimulating OUR economy, he wants to pour 700M into a bucket with holess in it.

Blatant thievery. Gov. Walker.

You shame the office of Govenor and Alaska. You are guilty of HURTING the innocent and poor and taking that which does not belong to you to take.
[EX A]: Non-obscene

[EX Q]: Comment: She's a far left loon....... just like anyone who believes this crap.....
[EX A]: Obscene

[EX Q]: Comment: Listen ... I think that all or most of the actions of those who started this mess - from the original editorial writer who half-jokingly suggested an "Appropriation Prize," to the lunkheads (Ken Whyte chief among them) who started actually putting up time and money to start one - were reprehensible and naively tone-deaf.

Thanks to them, this whole thing turned into a contest to see who could out-idiot the other and it ended up with grown men crying over live microphones in CBC studios.

But ... can non-Indigenous people write about Indigenous issues? The answer is ... must always be ... a resounding yes. 

That's because all writing, like any artform, is inherently organic. As humans, we write to inform, inspire or provoke. We do this by writing about what inform, inspires and provokes us.   Writing should never be bounded by race or ideology or cultural "experiences."

This hubbub is going to have a chilling effect on the writing and coverage of indigenous subjects in Canada.
[EX A]:
Non-obscene