We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

[EX Q]: Sent1: Only .06% of people who have killed kill again when they escape, are released, etc.
 Sent2: So as long as only some innocent people are killed for crimes they didn't commit then the system must be sound.
[EX A]: Not similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: I dont think the death penalty should be apllied in just any case.
 Sent2: I think the death penalty should only be used in extreme cases where the accused is, without a doubt, guilty.
[EX A]: Similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: An argument regarding the death penalty should be confined to discussions regarding those who have been wrongly convicted and sentenced to death.
 Sent2: Those are the only relevant ones, seeing as my argument is that the death penalty should be changed to life imprisonment.
[EX A]:
Not similar