Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.

Q: Oh wow Peter DeFazio got his name on something now he should move on to New Zealand. This editor is touting saving $24 million. For a bunch of bureaucrats that have been doing lunch meetings for several years that they even voted on any thing is amazing. I would be interested to see the over head of this committee. In fact the editor is totally wrong if the interest is saving money. The maybe 6-8 million not going to fund draft registration after committee costs will be spent on some thing else. Like maybe send it to ltd for their next round of monument building and legacy padding emx. Draft  registration just might serve another purpose. Like about the only thing left that demonstrates to 18 year olds they may be called on to defend what freedoms we have left in this country. Just the opposite of what is taught in schools.

A: No
****
Q: I bet she wont tell you if she supports TNR of other invasives or not. Its funny that she seems to have already ran off, ive noticed that these feral cat activist people can never answer these kind of questions and dissapear lol

A: No
****
Q: Ok Dermot, we get it...you went home with the last girl in the bar and when you woke up in the morning it was Harriet Drummond, we get it.

A:
No
****