In this task, you will be shown a sentence, and you should determine whether it is overruling or non-overruling. In law, an overruling sentence is a statement that nullifies a previous case decision as a precedent by a constitutionally valid statute or a decision by the same or higher ranking court which establishes a different rule on the point of law involved. Classify your answers into overruling or non-overruling

Q: siewe v. gonzales, 480 f.3d 160, 170 (2d cir. 2007) (""[a] single false document or a single instance of false testimony may (if attributable to the petitioner) infect the balance of the alien's uncorroborated or unauthenticated evidence."").

A: non-overruling
****
Q: i. dish's appeal

A: non-overruling
****
Q: see  anderson v. state, 18 so.3d 501, 520 (fla.2009) (rejecting a claim of cumulative error when appellant's claims, addressed individually, did not establish ineffective assistance of counsel or that appellant's constitutional rights were violated) (citing israel v. state, 985 so.2d 510, 520 (fla.2008)); suggs v. state, 923 so.2d 419, 441 (fla.2005) (stating the cumulative effect of evidentiary errors and allegations of ineffective assistance of trial counsel will be considered together).

A:
non-overruling
****