TASK DEFINITION: Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
PROBLEM: He would be crazy to have it anywhere near central Eugene.    The audience would overwhelming be protesters.   The rally would end up a huge failure.  

One almost wonders if he is coming here for the very purpose of putting on a spectacle that will garner him more headlines??

Maybe he would like to have a headline saying that liberals rioted at one of his rallies?   Protesters will need to control themselves, and not let Trump supporters bait them.

SOLUTION: No

PROBLEM: You throw in the years of tax reductions for the pharmaceutical houses in Puerto Rico which are just now hatching their toxic eggs for their residents and Big Pharma's profits, as aided by the Senate and Congress of the United States, really tend to add up.

SOLUTION: Yes

PROBLEM: A critical thinking textbook might categorize this post as an example of sweeping generalization. That aside, I would argue that all fields of knowledge have an ideology, though many strive to render it natural or invisible. Subject matter, epistemology, and ideology join hands to the extent that a branch of knowledge focuses on certain questions, enacts characteristic forms of inquiry and ways of knowing that produce certain kinds of beliefs. For example, a field of knowledge like natural science that many would say is fact not ideology embraces a materialist epistemology that runs counter to a spiritualist or religious epistemology. One sees truth revealed in an objective world from a process of observation and experiment. The other sees truth revealed from a divine source recorded in sacred texts by prophets. Individuals can hold multiple views and work within many knowledge systems. Have you explored your own ideology/worldview? Might explain why you feel antagonized by education.

SOLUTION:
Yes