In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

[Q]: Comment: HIS small white penis is showing
[A]: Sexual-explicit


[Q]: Comment: Trid sees nothing wrong with "No Dogs or Jews", "We don't serve Muslims" and so on. He supports bigotry. And no, that is NOT a straw man, but the clear and obvious implication of your " If either the buyer or the seller does not want to enter into that contract for whatever reason then I believe they have the right to refuse." Thank you for proving that your claim to being a Christian is a complete sham.
[A]: Non-sexual-explicit


[Q]: Comment: That is funny because the Harper haters complained for 9 years Harper was Obama and the USA's lap dog. Liberals are very adept at sucking and blowing at the same time.
[A]:
Sexual-explicit