Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.

Example Input: i dont know what part of 1 illegal or 2 worthy of risking someones else's life over.. but i do know the bikers are being 3 assholes... and if you view the video you will see that it is they who have put themselves in harms way.. blocking traffic on all three lanes for the pure pleasure of it.. well, guess what.. this guy wasn't amused... and though i do not condone his actions.. i certainly do understand his anger.. and i do not find it amusing either...
Example Output: Yes

Example Input: Take away their dayem cell phones while working for starters. Idiots. Start garnishing wages if they're that oblivious; that'll get their attention.
Example Output: Yes

Example Input: The parroted false and inaccurate  mantra that hunters pay for conservation is propaganda steering the imbalance of wildlife management in Alaska and the U.S. 
Here is the revenue breakdown to illuminate truth:
In Alaska, non hunters contribute the lions share of 65% of the Wildlife Conservation funding.   Hunters contribute a minority 35% of this budget.  General funds, federal funds and Pittman Robertson funds are not derived by hunters alone.  No, they are the minority of all these funding sources.  Wildlife conservation is paid by all citizens equally...the majority of citizens do not hunt but they are Alaskan and US citizens paying the majority of the funding to the Wildlife Conservation Division budget.
Example Output:
Yes