In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Q: Comment: I used to work for this cunt. Fuck her

A: Sexual-explicit
****
Q: Comment: Maybe Mr Hill should not waited until 5 days before the vote to request a ballot . I live in Prince Edward Island and I call the office about 3 weeks before the deadline and a very nice young lady mailed me a ballot and I returned it the next day after it was received.  I assume that it got counted.  I  placed Mr Scheer second on my ballot and did not put Mr. Bernier in the top 10.  Mainly on the dairy issue. He should know that canada Post would not get it to him in time. Suck it up and move on.

A: Sexual-explicit
****
Q: Comment: Maybe the messengers!  all of the people in politics now aren't in for us. I mean all of them Rs & Ds, so until "we the people" do something about that, we'll all keep voting for the losers that would be best for us. That means the Democrats are the minority because the working people of Alaska don't want to support freeloaders & unions. Sorry, that's the way I see it anyway and that's the way in plays at the election box as well. It doesn't mean I like it though.

A:
Non-sexual-explicit
****