Given a document, an entity and its sentiment towards the entity, verify if it is the correct sentiment towards the entity. Answer should be yes or no. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

[EX Q]: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Ryan Zinke is Negative . Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke  spent more than $14 000 on government helicopter rides for  himself   and staff  to travel to and from Washington D.C. events over the summer â including one time so  he  could ride horses with Vice President Mike Pence  a new investigation unveiled.
Through a Freedom of Information Act request   Zinke 's travel logs revealed  he  had used "taxpayer-funded vehicles from the U.S. Park Police to help accommodate  his  political events schedule " the Politico investigation reported.
On June 21   Zinke  ordered a Park Police helicopter for  him  and  his  chief of staff  Scott Hommel  in order to attend and emergency management exercise in Shepherdstown  West Virginia  Politico reported. The flight cost $8 000 and was justified by the Interior Department because it said  Zinke  wouldn't have been able to make the event in time otherwise.
"Secretary Zinkeâs last engagement in Washington D.C. is at 2 p.m. " and Interior staffer explained as a defense for  Zinke 's helicopter use. "Driving to [the West Virginia event] would not enable him to be on time and fully participate as scheduled."
Zinke's prior engagement was a ceremony for Rep. Greg Gianforte  R-Mont.  who filled  Zinke 's former seat with a special election victory in May. Gianforte and his wife also donated $15 800 to  Zinke 's previous congressional campaigns  Politico reported.
[EX A]: no

[EX Q]: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Waymo is Neutral . SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) - Alphabet Inc âs Waymo  sought at least $1 billion in damages and a public apology from Uber Technologies Inc as conditions for settling  its  high-profile trade secret lawsuit against the ride-services company  sources familiar with the proposal told Reuters.
The Waymo self-driving car unit also asked that an independent monitor be appointed to ensure Uber does not use  Waymo  technology in the future  the sources said.
Uber rejected those terms as non-starters  said the sources  who were not authorized to publicly discuss settlement talks. The precise dollar amount requested by  Waymo  and the exact time the offer was made could not be learned.
 Waymoâs  tough negotiating stance  which has not been previously reported  reflects the company âs  confidence in  its  legal position after months of pretrial victories in a case which may help to determine who emerges in the forefront of the fast-growing field of self-driving cars.
The aggressive settlement demands also suggest that  Waymo  is not in a hurry to resolve the lawsuit  in part because of  its  value as a distraction for Uber leadership  said Elizabeth Rowe  a trade secret expert at the University of Florida Levin College of Law.
 Waymo  recently persuaded a San Francisco federal judge to delay a trial to decide the dispute from October to early December  citing the need to investigate evidence Uber had not disclosed earlier.
Amy Candido  a  Waymo  attorney  declined to comment on any settlement talks  but said the companyâs reasons for suing Uber are âpretty clear.â
â Waymo  had one goal: to stop Uber from using  its  trade secrets â  she  said. âThat remains  its  goal.â
 Waymo  sued Uber in February  claiming that former engineer Anthony Levandowski downloaded more than 14 000 confidential files before leaving to set up a self-driving truck company  called Otto  which Uber acquired soon after.
Uber denied using any of Waymoâs trade secrets.
FILE PHOTO: The  Waymo  logo is displayed during the company's unveil of a self-driving Chrysler Pacifica minivan during the North American International Auto Show in Detroit  Michigan  U.S.  January 8  2017. REUTERS/Brendan McDermid/File Photo
 Waymoâs  lawsuit has been disruptive for Uber. U.S. District Judge William Alsup granted  Waymoâs  request for a pretrial injunction in May  which prohibited Levandowski from working on Lidar  a key sensor technology for self-driving cars that is the crux of the current litigation.
Uber later fired Levandowski  regarded as a visionary in autonomous technology  after he refused to return Waymo documents at the heart of the case. Levandowski has asserted his constitutional right against self-incrimination and declined to answer questions from  Waymo  lawyers.
Benchmark cited  Waymo âs allegations of trade secret theft in separate litigation aimed at forcing Kalanick off Uberâs board. A Delaware judge put that lawsuit on hold and sent it to private arbitration.
On Sunday Oct. 1  the day before Kalanick was scheduled to give a deposition in the Waymo case  Kalanickâs lawyers called  Waymo  and asked to postpone the deposition  lawyers for both companies said in court last week.
Kalanickâs lawyers said he was in the middle of a fight to appoint new board members and was therefore too busy   Waymo  attorneys said in court.  Waymo  refused the request  forcing Kalanick to attend the deposition.
[EX A]: yes

[EX Q]: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Kate Steinle is Positive . A Republican congressman plans to introduce a bill Monday that would threaten huge fines and prison time for elected officials accused of sheltering illegal immigrant criminals from deportation  in the wake of the not-guilty verdict in the Kate Steinle murder trial.
On Thursday  Jose Ines Garcia Zarate  an illegal immigrant who already had been deported back to Mexico five times  was acquitted in the 2015 murder of  Steinle  on a San Francisco pier.
Zarateâs attorneys argued Zarate had found a gun that accidentally discharged  and the bullet ricocheted off the ground before hitting  Steinle . Prosecutors argued Zarate intentionally shot 32-year-old Steinle.
The killing revived a national debate over sanctuary city policies  as some lawmakers as well as  Steinle âs family faulted San Francisco for releasing the suspect from a local jail without notifying federal immigration officials.
President Trump  who frequently cited  Steinle âs case on the campaign trail  called the not-guilty verdict âdisgracefulâ and a âcomplete travesty of justice.â
Attorney General Jeff Sessions took direct aim at the city  saying San Franciscoâs âdecision to protect criminal aliens led to the preventable and heartbreaking death of Kate Steinle.â
In an interview prior to Thursdayâs verdict  Steinleâs family said they wanted the case out of the national spotlight. âWe just want to get this over with and move on with our lives  and think about  Kate  on our terms â Jim Steinle   Kate âs father  told the San Francisco Chronicle.
Following the verdict   he  said  his  family was shocked Zarate was convicted only of firearm possession.
[EX A]:
no