In this task, you're given a paragraph from the research paper and your task is to generate a suitable title for the research paper based on the given paper. Under 100 words is a good title length.

Example Input: Being madly in love with all the advances in minimally invasive medicine and technology I often tell my friends the stories of how interventional radiology (IR) changes lives. One of these unintended stories led to a much bigger audience of TED community and spread the word about IR far beyond the circle of my friends. As the TED slogan promised, participating in the event 1 made me realize that our ideas of better medicine are worth sharing. It also made me think that better communication with the public is possible, and it does not take genius. It takes a willingness to try. We know that IR with its broad procedural spectrum, safety of minimally invasive approach, lower requirement for anesthesia and hospitalization, and cost-effectiveness has a strong stand in the evolving universal healthcare practice model. But, as Goethe said, knowing is not enough; we must apply. 2 Then, how can we as medical community increase the exercise of IR procedures? The starting point is to accept that many people, including medical professionals, do not know what diseases we can treat and what diagnostic or therapeutic services we can provide. Either it is a palliative treatment of metastases, or elective embolization of uterine fibroids, or emergent lysis of pulmonary embolism-it is our responsibility to find the appropriate patients and let both patients and primary physicians know what options we have to offer.
Example Output: Journal Pre-proof Guest Editorial: Radiology Nurses Can Raise the Impact on Promoting IR

Example Input: Limited data exist on how SARS-CoV-2 enters and spreads in the general population. We used two strategies for SARS-CoV-2 testing: targeted testing of high-risk individuals (n=4,551) and a population screening (n=5,502). We sequenced SARS-CoV-2 from 340 individuals. RESULTS March 22 2020, 528 had tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 in the targeted testing (11.6%) and 50 in the population screening (0.9%); approximately 0.2% of the Icelandic population. Large fractions of positives had travelled outside Iceland (38.4% and 34.0%). Fewer under 10 years old were positive than those older: 2.8% vs. 12.3% for targeted testing (P=1.6e-9) and 0.0% vs. 1.0% for population screening (P=0.031). Fewer females were positive in the targeted testing than males (9.5% vs. 14.6%, P=6.8e-9). SARS-CoV-2 came from eight clades, seven A clades and one B clade. The clade composition differed between the testing groups and changed with time. In the early targeted testing, 65.0% of clades were A2a1 and A2a2 derived from Italian and Austrian skiing areas, but in the later targeted testing went down to 30.6% and were overtaken by A1a and A2a, the most common clades in the population screening. SARS-CoV-2 has spread widely in Iceland outside of the high-risk groups. Several strains cause these infections and their relative contribution changed rapidly.
Example Output: Early Spread of SARS-Cov-2 in the Icelandic Population

Example Input: One hundred methanolic plant extracts were screened for antiviral activity against seven viruses. Twelve extracts were found to have antiviral activity at the noncytotoxic concentrations tested. The extracts of Rosa nutkunu and Amelunchier alnifoliu, both members of the Rosaceae, were very active against an enteric coronavirus. A root extract of another member of the Rosaceae, Potentillu urgutu, completely inhibited respiratory syncytial virus. A Sumbucus rucemosu branch tip extract was also very active against respiratory syncytial virus while the inner bark extract of Oplopunux horridus partially inhibited this virus. An extract of Ipomopsis uggregutu demonstrated very good activity against parainfluenza virus type 3. A Lomatium dissectum root extract completely inhibited the cytopathic effects of rotavirus. In addition to these, extracts prepared from the following plants exhibited antiviral activity against herpesvirus type 1: Carriamine angulatu, Conocephalum conicum, Lysichiton umericunum, Polypodium glycyrrhizu and Verbuscum thapsus. Achilles millefolium L. var. occidentalis DC. (Compositae) P-IO Whole plant Alnus rubra Bong. (Betulaceae) Q-l Bark, Q-2 Catkins Ambrosia chamissonis (Less.) Greene var. chamissonis (Compositae) Q-29 Aerial parts Amelanchier alnifolia Nutt. var. humptulipensis (Jones) Hitchc. (Rosaceae) P-6, P-15 Branches Antennaria microphylla Rydb. (Compositae) P-21 Whole plant Arctostaphylos uva-ursi (L.) Spreng. (Ericaceae) P-42a Branches, P-42b roots Argentina egedii (Womwk.) Rydb. (Rosaceae) Q-20 Aerial parts Arnica cordI$olia Hook. (Compositae) P-31 Aerial parts Arnica sororia Greene (Compositae) P-7 Aerial parts Artemisia ludoviciana Nutt. ssp. ludoviciana (Compositae) W-5 Aerial parts Artemisia michauxiana Bess. (Compositae) P-29 Aerial parts Artemisia tridentata Nutt. ssp. tridentata (Compositae) W-19 Branches Aruncus dioicus (Walt.) Fem. var. vuIgaris (maxim) Hara (Rosaceae) F-l Branches Asarum caudatum Lindl. (Aristolochiaceae) W-12 Whole plant Balsamorhiza sagittata (Pursh) Nutt. (Compositae) W-18 Aerial parts, P-2 roots Betula papy@ra Marsh (Betulaceae) P-38 Branches Capsella bursa-pastoris Medic. (Cruciferae) W-8 Whole plant Car&mine angulata Hook. (Cruciferae) Q-16 Roots Ceanothus velutinus Do@. ex Hook. (Rhamnaceae) P-39 Branches Chaenactis aiwglasii (Hook.) H. et A. (Compositae) P-3 Whole plant Chrysothamnw nauseosus (Pall.) Britt. ssp. albicaulis (Nutt.) H. et C. (Compositae) P-25 Branches Clematis ligusticifolia Nutt. ex T. et G. (Ranunculaceae) P-14 Aerial parts Conocephalwn conicum Plantago major L. (Plantaginaceae) Q-22 Whole Plant Polypodium glycyrrhiza D.C. Eaton (Polypodiaceae) Rhizomes Q-27 Polystichum munitum (Kaulf.) Presl (Polypodiaceae) Rhizomes Q-15 Popular tremuloides Michx. (Salicaceae) P-34 Branches Potentilla arguta Pursh (Rosaceae) W-7 Roots Prune virginiana L. var. demissa (Nutt.) Torr. (Rosaceae) W-9 Branches Prunes virginiana L. var. melanocarpa (Nels.) Sarg. (Rosaceae) P-40 Branches Thus glabra L. (Anacardiaceae) P-23 Branches Ribes sanguineum Pursh (Grossulariaceae) P-18 Branches Rosa nutkana Presl var. nutkana (Rosaceae) P-5 Branches Rubus parviflorus Nutt. (Rosaceae) P-28 Branches Salix bebbiana Sarg. (Salicaceae) P-36 Branches Sambucus cerulea Raf. (Caprifoliaceae) P-16 Branches Sambucus racemosa L. ssp. pubens (Michx.) House var. arborescens (T. et G.) A. Gray (Caprifoliaceae) Q-2 I Branches Sedum lanceolatum Torr. (Crassulaceae) P-20 Whole plant Shepherdia canadensis (L.) Nutt. (Elaeagnaceae) W-16 Berries Spiraea betultjolia Pall. (Rosaceae) P-41 Branches Symphoricarpos albus (L.) Blake var. laevigatus Fern. (Caprifoliaceae) P-26 Branches Urtica dioica L. ssp. gracilis (Ait.) Seland. var. lyallii (Wats.) Hitchc. (Urticaceae) P-27 Aerial parts Verbascum thapsus L. (Scrophulariaceae) P-24 Leaves Collectors for all species were A.R. McCutcheon and S.M. Ellis.
Example Output:
Antiviral screening of British Columbian medicinal plants