Categorize the comment on the basis of severe toxicity. If the comment is severely toxic output Yes, otherwise output No.

Ex Input:
Fuck you, WW for posting Hillary Clinton as a president. I get it, this is a pointless internet quiz, but it really highlights how pathetic your publication is in comparison to Portland Mercury who endorsed Bernie Sanders today. 
Place Hillary on the quiz was probably done with the intention to be funny; but it's not. I have much less desire to read your publication now than I ever have.

Ex Output:
Yes


Ex Input:
Most of the legislators don't even need offices in their districts because the population is small enough most people already just know their legislator. Certainly the larger areas like Fairbanks, Anchorage, Soldotna already have sufficient state offices to handle a couple legislators taking up residence.

The one point I disagree with you on though is expanding the legislature. We've tried measures, including cutting the session from 121 to 90 days to put them back in communities, instead they dither and run up special sessions. Why add more opinions and conflict in, while increasing costs to the public?

Ex Output:
No


Ex Input:
Time for a homeless camp. Let them drink and die all in one spot. It will make it easier to pick up the bodies. If they don't care about their life why should I?

Ex Output:

Yes