In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: insult and non-insult. Insult is any lanugage or act that is disrespectful or scornfully abusive.

[Q]: Comment: This action goes against everything he has preached over the past 4 years.  Why did his opinion suddenly change?  He's been mired in scandal after scandal after scandal and calls for his impeachment are growing louder every day.  This was his way of changing the channel.  He's pathetic.
[A]: Insult


[Q]: Comment: Furthermore, I like how the professor is de-legitimatizing Asian staff at the university. Are Asians not the RIGHT color? Shall Asians quit as they are taking up too much space?
[A]: Non-insult


[Q]: Comment: To quote:
It recommends that youth should not be allowed to buy recreational cannabis until at least the age of 21, instead of 18.
--

There is no such conclusive evidence with cannabis damaging the brain. The science clearly shows that it causes neuro-genesis and is anti-cancerous. They're relying on correlation (not causation) and that's scary to have such figures in our public and social services. It's doing (only to get worse) more of a disservice to science and society as a whole when promulgating such biased, non-objective and dogmatic rhetoric. This will negatively affect our future progeny, regardless if they're consumers or not - it's time they stop this BS!

 It is all outdated, pre-suppositions based on fallacious fear-mongering sophism, not science!

Alcohol is the true pernicious, dangerous recreational only psychotoxic drug, which objectively damages the brain - it's cytotoxic, neurotoxic and carcinogenic, with psycho-mimetic effects.

Will they make the alcohol age 25+?
[A]:
Non-insult