The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the no-need strategy, otherwise output No. no-need is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used when a participant points out that they do not need an item based on personal context such as suggesting that they have ample water to spare. no-need can directly benefit the opponent since it implies that the item is up for grabs.

[EX Q]: Context: 
Utterance: 'Hello there. I do not have a large family so i will give up on the food but i do have a medical condition where i have trouble regulating my temperature and need lots of fluids'
[EX A]: Yes

[EX Q]: Context: 'I really don't want to be without water, how about 2 water and 2 firewood for the 3 packages of food?' 'I just want to make sure I understand you I get 2 waters and 2 firewood and 0 food. ' 'That's right. Since you would be getting food from your sister, while I am camping alone, you would be getting more food pretty soon. '
Utterance: 'umm. I think the best and fair deal is a complete swap of water for food and you get 2 fire wood. '
[EX A]: No

[EX Q]: Context: 'I mean water and food' 'Is food something you need the most of or is it water?' 'I need 2 packages of both food and water on each'
Utterance: 'Food is a hard one to give 2 packes of since I dont have very much and need to feed my family.  We do have plenty of water though.  Would you be willing to take 3 packages of water and only get 1 package of food?'
[EX A]:
Yes