instruction:
In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.
question:
Comment: You hit the nail on the head.   What Kurgan and devotees call "humor" is in fact sarcasm and ridicule.
answer:
Non-obscene


question:
Comment: Canada's ash my ass, its Alaska's ash!
answer:
Obscene


question:
Comment: From the article: "[Ms. Bibeau] accused Stephen Harper’s government of muzzling Canada on the international stage and failing to champion women’s rights."
===========

Obviously Ms. Bibeau is a politician looking to score political points with the naive, that much is to be expected, but her argument here is absolutely not fact-based.  Stephan Harper's really big push for foreign aid during his tenure was all about maternal health.  Of course the usual suspects found fault in everything he did and all foreign aid can be easily criticized for any number of failings, but to say that Harper foreign aid plans weren't meant to help women is patently false.
answer:

Non-obscene