TASK DEFINITION: In this task, you are given the abstract of a research paper. Your task is to generate a summary of this abstract. Your summary should not be very short, but it's better if it's not more than 30 words.
PROBLEM: Driven by the need for parallelizable hyperparameter optimization methods, this paper studies \emph{open loop} search methods: sequences that are predetermined and can be generated before a single configuration is evaluated. Examples include grid search, uniform random search, low discrepancy sequences, and other sampling distributions.
 In particular, we propose the use of $k$-determinantal point processes in  hyperparameter optimization via random search. Compared to conventional uniform random search where hyperparameter settings are sampled independently, a $k$-DPP promotes diversity.   We describe an approach that transforms hyperparameter search spaces for efficient use with a $k$-DPP. In addition, we introduce a novel Metropolis-Hastings algorithm which can sample from $k$-DPPs defined over spaces with a mixture of discrete and continuous dimensions. Our experiments show significant benefits over uniform random search  in realistic scenarios with a limited budget for training supervised learners, whether in serial or parallel.

SOLUTION: Driven by the need for parallelizable, open-loop hyperparameter optimization methods, we propose the use of $k$-determinantal point processes in  hyperparameter optimization via random search.

PROBLEM: We study the problem of learning and optimizing through physical simulations via differentiable programming. We present DiffSim, a new differentiable programming language tailored for building high-performance differentiable physical simulations. We demonstrate the performance and productivity of our language in gradient-based learning and optimization tasks on 10 different physical simulators. For example, a differentiable elastic object simulator written in our language is 4.6x faster than the hand-engineered CUDA version yet runs as fast, and is 188x faster than TensorFlow. Using our differentiable programs, neural network controllers are typically optimized within only tens of iterations. Finally, we share the lessons learned from our experience developing these simulators, that is, differentiating physical simulators does not always yield useful gradients of the physical system being simulated. We systematically study the underlying reasons and propose solutions to improve gradient quality.

SOLUTION: We study the problem of learning and optimizing through physical simulations via differentiable programming, using our proposed DiffSim programming language and compiler.

PROBLEM: We revisit the Recurrent Attention Model (RAM, Mnih et al. (2014)), a recurrent neural network for visual attention, from an active information sampling perspective. 

 We borrow ideas from neuroscience research on the role of active information sampling in the context of visual attention and gaze (Gottlieb, 2018), where the author suggested three types of motives for active information sampling strategies. We find the original RAM model only implements one of them.

 We identify three key weakness of the original RAM and provide a simple solution by adding two extra terms on the objective function. The modified RAM 1) achieves faster convergence, 2) allows dynamic decision making per sample without loss of accuracy, and 3) generalizes much better on longer sequence of glimpses which is not trained for, compared with the original RAM. 


SOLUTION:
 Inspired by neuroscience research, solve three key weakness of the widely-cited recurrent attention model by simply adding two terms on the objective function.