The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the no-need strategy, otherwise output No. no-need is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used when a participant points out that they do not need an item based on personal context such as suggesting that they have ample water to spare. no-need can directly benefit the opponent since it implies that the item is up for grabs.

Input: Consider Input: Context: 'Oh. Let do some deal. If you give me all water bottles I will give you 2 firewood. Can you accept this' 'i could give you 2 water bottles and 3 food if you can do 3 firewood' 'OK. Are you need Extra food packages?'
Utterance: 'no, I am okay with food which is why I offered them all to you since all my firewood is ruined. I figured if i gave you 2 water and 3 food you might be able to spare the 3 firewood'

Output: Yes


Input: Consider Input: Context: 'Hi! I look forward to making a trade with you that's good for us both.' 'Me too, hopefully we can get together on a deal.'
Utterance: 'I'm hoping so too. What's most valuable to you?'

Output: No


Input: Consider Input: Context: 'I am too.  I am so looking forward to this.  ' 'Yes! I am so on the same page as you. I want to be sure I'm set and prepared. 🙂' 'Would you consider letting me have 2 of the 3 extra firewood?  I have health issues and I get really cold sometimes.☹️'
Utterance: 'Yes, I think that would be very fair, since I don't have health issues myself. Would you allow me to have 2 of the 3 food items? I need energy for hiking. 🙂'


Output: Yes