In this task, you will be shown a sentence, and you should determine whether it is overruling or non-overruling. In law, an overruling sentence is a statement that nullifies a previous case decision as a precedent by a constitutionally valid statute or a decision by the same or higher ranking court which establishes a different rule on the point of law involved. Classify your answers into overruling or non-overruling

Input: Consider Input: to the extent that the holding in travelers ins. co. v. fancher, supra, is inconsistent with our holding here, it is overruled.

Output: overruling


Input: Consider Input: ""if any such challenge to the underlying conviction is successful, the defendant may then apply for reopening of his federal sentence.""

Output: non-overruling


Input: Consider Input: thus, to the extent the language in baltins v. james, supra, 36 cal.app.3d 1193, can be read as implying that "actual injury" is determined by any bright line rule, we disapprove that language.


Output: overruling