We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Q: Sent1: We measured firearm protection as an attempted or completed crime in which the victim reported using a gun to attack or threaten an offender.
 Sent2: If guns really provided this kind of protection, we could easily imagine that one of the previous nine murder attempts would have been successful, had the victim not possessed a gun.

A: Not similar
****
Q: Sent1: I worry that the reduction of gun ownership will increase crime rates even in households with a gun.
 Sent2: That said, the idea that non gun homicides dont increase does not show causation between high gun ownership and increased murder rates.

A: Not similar
****
Q: Sent1: You still have to prove that gun control equals crime control and your admission that it does not is proof that it is about control and dependency on government to protect you when they have no obligation to do so.
 Sent2: If anything, cops will come to where you live to take your guns, seeing as they work for the government.

A:
Not similar
****