In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine the neutral choice based on your inference from the statement and your commonsense knowledge. The neutral choice is a sentence that neither agrees nor disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3', corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence. If sentence X agrees with sentence Y, one's correctness follows from the other one. If sentence X disagrees with sentence Y, they can not be correct at the same time.

[EX Q]: Statement: which surprised me that that uh through the jury discussion they were able to convince him against his original opinion so maybe that speaks well for juries Choices: 1. Jury discussions never change anyone's opinions.  2. Jury discussions often result in people changing their original opinions.  3. Through jury discussion, they were able to convince him to abandon his original opinion; perhaps that speaks well of juries. 
[EX A]: 2

[EX Q]: Statement: Four are essential to case study  iteration, OTTR, triangulation, and ruling out rival explanations. Choices: 1. Four are needed for making sure the rival explanations are in fact correct. 2. Four are needed for making sure the rival explanations are ruled out. 3. Four are needed to prove that the rival explanations can't happen because of gravity.
[EX A]: 3

[EX Q]: Statement: The information is shown as the number of kWh per dollar of GDP (measured in constant 1999 dollars). Choices: 1. GDP calculations are complex 2. The GDP dollar isn't calculated with kwh 3. The information is shown in kWH per dollar of gdp
[EX A]:
1