We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Example Input: Sent1: I believe in gun control (and wrote this piece to satirize pro-gunners) because I hate guns and want to see them all banned, which is why I own guns and also enjoy reading firearms-related literature.
 Sent2: Machine guns are not in common use so I see no reason to believe restrictions on them would be lifted based on the ruling.
Example Output: Not similar

Example Input: Sent1: The opposite of "more guns = less crime is not true" is not "more guns = more crime".
 Sent2: You've accepted the first posit - that less guns will result in less gun killings.
Example Output: Not similar

Example Input: Sent1: I could easily point out how many people are killed by criminals because they aren't armed and able to fight back, and that could be seen as grounds for removing the restrictive gun laws we have in this country.
 Sent2: I am not attacking anyone, I am just pointing out that if there were armed citizens on board, and again, we do not know if there were, they did not use their guns.
Example Output:
Not similar