In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

Comment: Milo was right:  feminism is a form of cancer.
Identity-attack

Comment: Oh, those 'naughty' BC Liberals! First, Christy shrugs and says, "The BC voters don't care corrupt we are.", then disappears until the whole thing blows over (she hopes). Then her deputy crime boss, Rich Coleman comes out and throws their donors under the bus. If that wasn't bad enough, Suzanne Anton, Attorney General, stands up in QP and throws their lobbyists under the bus.  Who's next?
Non-identity-attack

Comment: What's truly telling is that conservatives attack this bill for - get this - not being AWFUL enough. 


Why do people keep voting for these awful people? They want to transfer more money to the donor class, and make all of our lives miserable. Haven't we already had enough of Ronnie Raygunomics? The wealth transfer to the donor class has already been staggering over the decades since Ronnie, and they want even more to stuff into their gaping maw, with an assist from the cons. MAGA?

Non-identity-attack