instruction:
In this task, you will be presented with a context from an academic paper and you have to write an answerable question based on the context. Your questions can be extractive, abstractive, or yes-no questions.
question:
Participants who were shown the definition were more likely to suggest to ban the tweet. In fact, participants in group one very rarely gave different answers to questions one and two (18 of 500 instances or 3.6%). This suggests that participants in that group aligned their own opinion with the definition.
answer:
How did the authors demonstrate that showing a hate speech definition caused annotators to partially align their own opinion with the definition?


question:
Finally, we performed hyperparameter tuning by adjusting the number of coattention blocks, the batch size, and the number of epochs trained and ensembled our three best networks.
answer:
What hyperparameters have been tuned?


question:
 Generally, providing an incorrect speaker and/or audience information decreases the BLEU scores, while providing the correct information substantially improves it - we see an increase of up to 2.3 BLEU over the baseline. We see that the baseline system severely under-predicts the feminine form of verbs as compared to the reference. The “He said” conditions further decreases the number of feminine verbs, while the “I said” conditions bring it back to the baseline level. Finally, the “She said” prefixes substantially increase the number of feminine-marked verbs, bringing the proportion much closer to that of the reference (though still under-predicting some of the feminine cases).
answer:

How is it demonstrated that the correct gender and number information is injected using this system?