In this task, you will be shown a sentence, and you should determine whether it is overruling or non-overruling. In law, an overruling sentence is a statement that nullifies a previous case decision as a precedent by a constitutionally valid statute or a decision by the same or higher ranking court which establishes a different rule on the point of law involved. Classify your answers into overruling or non-overruling

Q: we reject the defendant's contention that the marriage relationship and the right of consortium deriving therefrom preclude the state from ever establishing the nonconsensual entry requisite to the crime of burglary, and we disapprove the third district's contrary ruling in vazquez.

A: overruling
****
Q: the rationale behind the principle that a ""defendant may not receive a harsher sentence solely, or even partially, because he refuses to plead guilty and proceeds to require the prosecution to prove his guilt"" ""is that the coercion or inducement casts a chill over the exercise of guaranteed fundamental constitutional rights.""

A: non-overruling
****
Q: ramirez has shown that reasonable jurists would debate whether the district court erred in dismissing his  2255 motion without prejudice as premature based on a finding that he had a pending direct appeal.

A:
non-overruling
****