Given a document, find the main entity about whom the author is writing. Write the full name if mentioned in the text. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

Example Input: Olympic gold medalist Aly Raisman has stripped down for Sports Illustrated's Swimsuit issue.
The move comes after  Raisman  made headlines recently for presenting a powerful 13-minute testimony against Larry Nassar during which she directly told the former Olympic doctor  âYou are nothing."
âI would like to remind everyone that being a survivor is nothing to be ashamed of  and going through a hard time does not define you â  Raisman  said to SI Swim. âI hope that we can one day get to a point where everyone realizes that women do not have to be modest to be respected. We are free to draw confidence and happiness in our own way  and it is never for someone else to choose for us or to even judge us for that matter.â
âFor me  âIn Her Own Wordsâ serves as a reminder that we are all humans  we are all battling something  and it is OK to not be OK â  Raisman  said. âWe are not alone and we need each other.â
âYou lose a part of yourself when youâre abused â  Raisman  recently told People. âI lost a part of myself  and Iâm getting it back by speaking out.â
Example Output: Aly Raisman

Example Input: My name is Graham Weinschenk and I am a Democrat. Among other things  I believe in a womanâs right to choose  that diversity strengthens us  that love will always win  and that protecting the environment is a necessity. These are not things that  âDemocraticâ Congressional candidate Sergio Coppola (6th CD)  believes in.
There are a number of problems with the âIssuesâ page of Cappolaâs website. First   he  fails to actually take a position on most of the issues listed.  He  walks a fine line of attempting to take both sides of most issues. In the process of doing this   he  reveals some pretty outrageous things  which are enumerated below:
 Coppola  Does Not Support Common Sense Gun Control
 Coppola âs position here is incredibly unclear.  He  argues that guns are essential for âthe ability to form a militiaâ and that âaccess to guns is a constitutional right for self-protectionâ. However   he  does support regulations that would prevent the mentally ill from buying guns. But that seems to be where  he  draws the line.  Coppola  then makes a non-specific statement that gun holders need to face more accountability. What does that mean?
 Coppola  is Both Pro-Life and Pro-Choice?
This one is one of the strangest because  Coppola  seems to make both arguments here.  He  says that  he  âbelieves all life is importantâ and that  he  â[does] not support abortion as a method of birth controlâ. Then  he  does an immediate 360 and says that  he  believes âthat a woman has a right to decide what should happen to her bodyâ. Which is it?
 Coppola  Doesnât Understand Being LGBT
Although  Coppola  does say that  he  is against limiting access to government programs and benefits based on sexual orientation   he  also says that a personâs sexual orientation is a DECISION. Itâs 2017. Really.
 Coppola  Believes that America Was Created Based on Christian Principles
Again  there are some positives and negatives here.  He  believes that our laws should be further separated from religion  yet  he  also believes that America was founded based on âChristian principlesâ. This is just factually incorrect. The principal behind both of these are very different.
 Coppola  Is All Over the Place on Immigration
This one just really doesnât make sense. First   he  says that immigration is key to American culture. Then   he  says that immigrants must âassimilateâ to American culture.
 Coppola  Wants a Flat Tax
Again   Coppola  got this right out of The Heritage Foundation. Having a flat tax is extremely regressive  and would do absolutely nothing for the struggling working class.  He  claims that  he  wants a flat tax of 23%  and  he  says that this would lead to everyone paying their âfair share.â Really? 23% for someone making $30 000 a year is a lot different than someone making $300 000 a year  or $3 000 000 a year.
 Coppola  Is an Isolationist
 Coppola  apparently has an issue with the amount of money that the United States spends overseas on goodwill projects and development (a tiny percentage of the budget  by the way  with most of the money coming back to the U.S. in military sales  purchases of American goods and services  etc.). In other words   Coppola  would rather see the US isolate itself than operate as the leader of the free world. We canât afford to take a step back from our spot on the world stage. I must add that  Coppola  also supports cutting military spending.
Example Output: Sergio Coppola

Example Input: This mystery professor is likely  Joseph Mifsud of the University of Stirling in Scotland . According to a calendar entry on the Valdai clubâs website   Mifsud  spoke on a Valdai panel on April 19  2016  titled  âWorld Energy: Key Trends and Political Risks.â  Mifsud  grew up in the Mediterranean nation of Malta  where  he  served in various government posts;  he  was the only Londoner and the only professor on the panel. The Mueller legal filing revealed that Papadopoulos had extensive contacts with the professor as part of an effort to set up a meeting between Trump campaign representatives and Russian officials. Papadopoulos told his campaign supervisors about this effort and was encouraged to proceed. Papadopoulos has pleaded guilty to lying to the FBI about his communications with the professor and others connected to Russia.
The Washington Post noted on Monday that  Mifsud  is probably the professor cited in the Mueller statement. One of the emails quoted in the document  according to the Post  âappears to match one described to the Washington Post in August in which Papadopoulos identified the professor with whom he met as Joseph Mifsud  the director of the London Academy of Diplomacy.â But the Post reported that in August Mifsud told the newspaper he had âabsolutely no contact with the Russian government â and he insisted his ties to Russia were purely academic.
The public record  though  contains information contradicting  Mifsud  and showing that  he  has had contacts with Russian government officials. According to photos on the website of Russiaâs embassy in the United Kingdom   Mifsud  met with embassy representative Ernest Chernukhin in July of this year (weeks before  he  issued  his  denial to the Post). A biography from a 2013 business conference says  Mifsud  âhas advised Governments on international education issues in many countries including Morocco  Syria  Russia  Tunisia  and Italy.â  Mifsud  also met with Russian Ambassador to the UK Alexander Yakovenko in May of 2014  according to a 2014 Russian embassy press release.
Additionally  in early 2017   Mifsud  invited Alexey Klishin  a department head and professor in the international law division of the Moscow State Institute of International Relations  a school run by Russiaâs Foreign Ministry  to the London Academy of Diplomacy to present a lecture. Klishin was a former member of the upper house of the Russian parliament. According to a January 2017 press release from the Institution of the Russian Academy of Sciences  âKlishinâs presentation was devoted to international law and national legal systems [and] to their coexistence in the era of Brexit and the new presidency in the United States.â The release noted that Klishin had âvisited the London Academy of Diplomacy at the University of Stirlingâ¦at the invitation of  the Director Joseph Mifsud .â Hereâs a photo with  Mifsud  (second from the right) and Klishin (center) standing next to each other:
 Mifsud  did not respond to a request for comment from Mother Jones.
One obvious question for the professor is why he told the Post he had âabsolutelyâ no contacts with Russian officials when on-line material suggests he has. There are no indication in the Mueller statement whether his team has questioned  Mifsud  about the Clinton âdirtâ or Papadopoulosâs initiative to create a back-channel bond between the Trump campaign and Vladimir Putinâs office.
Thereâs another reason why  Mifsud  could be of interest to Mueller and his investigators. In the past year  the New York Times has reported that US intelligence agencies collected information in the summer of 2016 indicating that top Russian intelligence and political officials were looking to gain influence over Trump through his advisers and that US spy agencies had intercepted calls showing that Trump campaign aides and other Trump associates had repeated interactions with senior Russian intelligence officials  perhaps unwittingly. (In June  former FBI chief James Comey  in congressional testimony  disputed the Times story disclosing contacts between the Trump aides and Russian intelligence  but he did not specify what was wrong with the article.) So Mueller is no doubt looking for possible instances of when Russian intelligence infiltratedâor tried to infiltrateâthe Trump campaign  either directly or through witting or unwitting cut-outs. And the Papadopoulos episode could be a case not only of a Trump aide trying to establish a campaign connection with the Kremlin but of Russian intelligence attempting to score a contact within the Trump campaign.
Example Output:
Joseph Mifsud