In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: insult and non-insult. Insult is any lanugage or act that is disrespectful or scornfully abusive.

Q: Comment: Agree that Bannon's pushing to get out of the Paris Accord was a terrible move.

"Climate Change" is the closest thing there is to a world religion.  Even the DPRK has signed on to the Paris Accord, not of course, that it really affects them in any material way.

Giving notice to withdraw from the Paris Accord has been a complete disaster with respect to the allies we desperately need during this extremely perilous time.  The U.K., France, and Germany are good examples of this.

Trump should have simply smiled and pursued the tact that Xi & Modi have -- i.e.  tacit agreement but still acting in their nation's best interest.

Since Bannon helped to orchestrate Trump's upset win he's certainly not an "idiot" with respect to grass roots politics.  He might well be deemed an "idiot" for the disastrous effect his climate change stance has had on our geo-political security.

Do you have any specific examples which prove that Bannon is a "racist?"

Thanks.

A: Insult
****
Q: Comment: Well, Yes. Of course there is still some racism by Whites (and ALL Racial groups)-
but nothing like the past. In your (Daimler Portland) example, I wonder if any of those white workers were American whites? 

It IS a strange development to have increased (apparent) racism towards a man who has been with the company for 22 years. Unless these Are American whites, and groups such as "Black Lives Matter" and shootings of  Police Officers have created a backlash situation were more Whites are developing a negative view of Blacks?

A: Non-insult
****
Q: Comment: The US Office was trash compared to the BBC one.

A:
Insult
****