The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the no-need strategy, otherwise output No. no-need is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used when a participant points out that they do not need an item based on personal context such as suggesting that they have ample water to spare. no-need can directly benefit the opponent since it implies that the item is up for grabs.

[Q]: Context: 'Hello' 'Hi there.. how are you doing today?  I hope well!  🙂  So, it looks like we need to divy up these supplies, huh?  Do you have any thoughts on the issue?'
Utterance: 'I'm doing fine thank you, how about you? Well for my trip I'm most interesting in socializing so a great campfire a night would be great, I'd prefer not to boil water either so want extra of that too. Food less so as I will go fishing and know wild vegetables, fruits and mushrooms I can pick. How about you?'
[A]: Yes


[Q]: Context: 'Hi! How is your camping trip going?' 'It's going good we could use some more supplies such as food and firewood, though.'
Utterance: 'Same here haha. Is water your lowest priority item too?'
[A]: No


[Q]: Context: 'What do you need it for?' 'I would like some extra food in case I get hungry.' 'Okay that sounds ok, I can do without the food. I also need two packages of water because it will be very hot out.'
Utterance: 'I can give you 2 packages of water.  I think there is plenty of water, so I do not need extra water.🙂'
[A]:
Yes