In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Comment: There's always a cynic in every crowd...
Non-obscene

Comment: Murkowski's in the Trump camp. She gotta go.
Non-obscene

Comment: Womanizing isn't sexual assault, Ms. Maclaine. 
wom·an·ize
ˈwo͝oməˌnīz/
verb
(of a man) engage in numerous casual sexual affairs with women. 
Ms. Loew could just might be a modern woman like me, and is all for womanizing and "manizing" so long as it's consensual. Womanizing, manizing and abortion rights come down to issues of ownership and consent. 
Women own their bodies whether they know it or not. I know I own my body and every single cell in it belongs to me. So when someone presumes to touch, coerce or pretend to own and control my body, it's "say hello to my little friend."

About the womanizers, BRING THEM ON. Us manizers out here don't mind them. That's all fun and games we play if we want to.
Your party is a sick misogynist joke but blame yourself since it's people like you who made it that way. As for the bible, it's a book and anyone can read it, quote it, live by it or dismiss it, at will. You don't own Jesus either. My guess is he'd disown y'all if he weren't so forgiving.

Non-obscene