In this task, you are given a part of an article. Your task is to generate headline (title) for this text. Preferred headlines are under fifteen words.

[Q]: Collaborative data consist of ratings relating two distinct sets of objects: users and items. Much of the work with such data focuses on filtering: predicting unknown ratings for pairs of users and items. In this paper we focus on the problem of visualizing the information. Given all of the ratings, our task is to embed all of the users and items as points in the same Euclidean space. We would like to place users near items that they have rated (or would rate) high, and far away from those they would give low ratings. We pose this problem as a real-valued non-linear Bayesian network and employ Markov chain Monte Carlo and expectation maximization to find an embedding. We present a metric by which to judge the quality of a visualization and compare our results to Eigentaste, locally linear embedding and cooccurrence data embedding on three real-world datasets.
[A]: Visualization of Collaborative Data


[Q]: We show that collaborative filtering can be viewed as a sequence prediction problem, and that given this interpretation, recurrent neural networks offer very competitive approach. In particular we study how the long short-term memory (LSTM) can be applied to collaborative filtering, and how it compares to standard nearest neighbors and matrix factorization methods on movie recommendation. We show that the LSTM is competitive in all aspects, and largely outperforms other methods in terms of item coverage and short term predictions.
[A]: Collaborative Filtering with Recurrent Neural Networks


[Q]: We propose a series of recurrent and contextual neural network models for multiple choice visual question answering on the Visual7W dataset. Motivated by divergent trends in model complexities in the literature, we explore the balance between model expressiveness and simplicity by studying incrementally more complex architectures. We start with LSTM-encoding of input questions and answers; build on this with context generation by LSTM-encodings of neural image and question representations and attention over images; and evaluate the diversity and predictive power of our models and the ensemble thereof. All models are evaluated against a simple baseline inspired by the current state-of-the-art, consisting of involving simple concatenation of bag-of-words and CNN representations for the text and images, respectively. Generally, we observe marked variation in image-reasoning performance between our models not obvious from their overall performance, as well as evidence of dataset bias. Our standalone models achieve accuracies up to 64.6%, while the ensemble of all models achieves the best accuracy of 66.67%, within 0.5% of the current state-of-the-art for Visual7W.
[A]:
Recurrent and Contextual Models for Visual Question Answering