In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence can be inferred from the statement. Incorrect choices change the meaning in important ways or have details that are not mentioned in the statement. Indicate your answer as 1,2, or 3 corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.
--------
Question: Statement: The anti-HMO strategy is also evidence of the pernicious influence of Anecdotal Politics. Choices:  1. There is a strategy to fight HMOs. 2. There is a strategy to fight HMOs that has been highly successful. 3. No one is sure what to do with HMOs.

Answer: 1


Question: Statement: okay you know basically the size of uh the area around Richardson Choices:  1. So it's about the same size as the area around Richardson. 2. Far, far bigger than the area around Richardson. 3. It's located about 30 miles away from Richardson.

Answer: 1


Question: Statement: right well  it's it's it's real small but uh like i said i mean the death penalty could probably be justified if if the evidence if there's no doubt no i never have Choices:  1. If there's evidence, then the death penalty is fine for murderers.  2. If there's evidence, then the death penalty is fine. 3. If there's evidence, then the death penalty can still be wrong.

Answer:
2