We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

Input: Consider Input: Guns in the hands of law abiding citizens save lives, the statistics back this up from EVERY country EVER to introduce gun control.

Output: Valid


Input: Consider Input: Secondly, the reason that interpreting the Second Amendment isn't necessary is because Congress doesn't have the enumerated power to take guns away from the citizens.

Output: Valid


Input: Consider Input: In fact, during a decade of fighting, losses by the US Armed forces totalled 47,378 more than the average of 45,000 people killed each year in car accidents during the mid-sixties.


Output: Valid