Categorize the comment on the basis of toxicity. If the comment is toxic (harmful, malicious, derogatory, threat, insult, identity attck, etc.) output Yes, otherwise output No.

[EX Q]: You keep posting about how strong the 4J teacher's union is. As I've said before this proves you have no idea what you are talking about. The 4J teachers union is pathetic. I have no idea where you are getting you information from. It's so off base I wonder if you are some 4J administration sock puppet.
[EX A]: Yes

[EX Q]: Boo hoo, Hillary is so "uninspiring" and lord knows (infantile) Americans must be "inspired." The problem is the overactive and ideological imagination of the populace. Hillary Clinton will continue the policies of Barack Obama and if Americans find this state of affairs unsatisfactory they only have lack of political involvement and naivete to blame. Finally, the Republican party's backwardness is coming home to roost and what do we see? A bunch of ideological idiots on the so-called American "left" fantasizing that a country where fanatics shoot doctors and women seeking abortions is going to turn into a Sweden-style social democracy in the course of a single presidential election. Now is the finally the moment for the Democratic party to take over the political center (a strategic move for the future) and lo and behold the Sanders people have arrived to screw that up. Never underestimate the ability of Americans to shoot themselves in the foot.
[EX A]: Yes

[EX Q]: Well, he could have bought a box and nails and pressure cooker and blown up even more people.  He could have loaded his car up with propane tanks and gasoline and driven it through the building and killed and maimed even more.
[EX A]:
Yes