In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

Q: Comment: "All these players (Caldwell, legislators) all have serious cases of delusions, amnesia, dementia and corruption"  -roxie 

You forgot hubris :-)

A: Non-identity-attack
****
Q: Comment: Don't like it?  Go back to the Muslim shite-hole you climbed out of.

A: Identity-attack
****
Q: Comment: One of the more interesting aspects here is that this was a real review, by real customers, not a fake review by a competitor or the owners themselves and friends and family. 

Like Blabber in that comment, I depend on reviews but – in case this is useful to anybody else – I also try to watch for the obvious fakes and read through them for hints. 

I always distrust reviews when there are just a few, because it's so easy for owners to fake a few. I discount favorable reviews when they the same wording as the marketing of the business, because I suspect those are owners, friends, family of owners, not objective customers. And I read through the bad ones, when I'm really interested, to weed out the cases in which – just as one example – they hated the restaurant but they will say, in the review, that they were kicked out because they were drunk. Sometimes the authors of what I call "revenge reviews" are so angry they make it obvious.

A:
Non-identity-attack
****