In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Q: Comment: This might sound harsh and I'm ok with you thinking so... Here is my thought on what Masuma Khan had to say about the white people who can kiss her ass. It goes as follows...
Words right out of a terrorist's mouth!!
Masuma Khan posts on Facebook... "White fragility can kiss my ass. Your white tears aren't sacred, your land is." This doesn't sound very Canadian to me, sounds more like the threat of a terrorist. We, real true Canadians, don't take kindly to threats... You think we are frail - we have a surprise for you! Watch out white people - this woman will stab you in the back without thinking twice.
She should not just face disciplinary action for her racist remark... she should be put on the "Terrorist Watch List". What she said was a direct threat to the white race .. who are we kidding??
Her words are no different than those of the ISIS terrorist's who post their threats to the World Cup...
At least we white's know who our friends are .. definitely not her.
KICK HER OUT!!

A: Sexual-explicit
****
Q: Comment: Alceste, you are a woman's sexual organ

A: Sexual-explicit
****
Q: Comment: First, you have to convince the US Congress to pass a law permitting a State to go bankrupt---like they refused to do earlier this year when Puerto Rico proved that their Democratically-controlled government was too incompetent to manage their own  budget over numerous years.

You have to convince the Oregon Supreme Court that OUR Constitution is wrong when it says that you can't impair Contracts.  (If you can't do that, the Federal Courts will let their decision stand.  "States rights", I think they call it.  It will never get to SCOTUS.)

You have to also convince our Oregon Supreme Court that the US CONSTITUTION is wrong when it says you can't impair Contracts.

THEN you have to convince SCOTUS....and there are several of the 'liberal' Justices who may be 'liberal' on abortion or affirmative action and such who are downright super-conservative on other types of issues....like whether the Contract clause should be followed.

A:
Non-sexual-explicit
****