Given a document, an entity and its sentiment towards the entity, verify if it is the correct sentiment towards the entity. Answer should be yes or no. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

Input: Consider Input: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Ichiro Ozawa is Neutral . Political strongman Ozawa willing to face Japan ethics panel
 "I think it would be a way to go  if it helps the public understand the issue " Ozawa told reporters at a regular press briefing.
 His move came as his ruling Democratic Party of Japan (DPJ) prepares for a tough summer election because of the funds scandal and the public's growing disappointment with Prime Minister Yukio Hatoyama.
 Ozawa  dubbed the "Shadow Shogun" and regarded as the real power behind Hatoyama  was suspected of having played a role in manipulating the financial statements of his fund management body.
 Three of his former and current aides were arrested in connection with the case. But prosecutors earlier decided not to file criminal charges against Ozawa due to lack of evidence.
 He has pledged to stay on as the DPJ's secretary general despite growing public distrust in him.
 Investigators met Ozawa during the weekend for a fresh round of questioning after a citizens' judicial review panel said they believed the veteran politician should be indicted.
 Ozawa told the Monday press conference that nothing new had come up in his latest meeting with investigators.
 He said he had agreed to open the traditionally closed-door session should he appear before the ethics panel  "because I have not done anything wrong."
 Ozawa's decision came as the Hatoyama government's approval rating continues to sink  with elections for the upper house likely to be held in July.

Output: no


Input: Consider Input: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Joe III is Positive . The similarities between Joe Kennedy III and Donald Trump are  in a sense  obvious. Both are white men  northeasterners  teetotalers. They are products of the Ivy League and great wealth. They joined their respective family trades – real estate for Trump  politics for Joe III.
The differences are obvious too  and more illuminating. Joe III is a liberal avatar of American institutions: the Kennedy family  Stanford  Harvard Law. Self-effacing in person  he recognizes how easy his path has been – he only briefly served as an assistant DA before taking a House seat -- and had  until now  chosen to mitigate charges of nepotism by playing the part of diligent backbencher. The Kennedys  for all their famous faults  have the saving grace that comes from being in on the joke; when President Kennedy appointed his younger brother attorney general  he quipped that he was just trying to give Bobby some experience before he started practicing law.
The result is the great destabilization of the Trump era. Few  it seems  have a firm grasp on what is happening  let alone what might happen next. Everybody  regardless of their ideology  thinks they're losing. A realignment appears to be happening in our politics  but nobody can agree on what it looks like. "We all feel the fault lines of a fractured country " as  Joe III  put it in  his  stilted  awkward speech on Tuesday night.
There is  of course  an element of nostalgia in liberalism's newfound fondness for our institutions. Trump-era liberalism  with its emphasis on American global leadership and veneration of federal agencies and the mainstream press  would be easily recognizable to that first generation of Kennedys. And in that sense  it makes sense that  Joe III  would become a natural face of contemporary Democratic politics.
Tuesday night was an attempt to make  Joe III  a symbol of institutional resistance to Trump. To the question of whether the institutions are worth saving  and therefore capable of reform   Joe III 's answer is an enthusiastic yes.  He  is  in a sense  already a symbol of how  his  own family has repaired itself from its reckless  impulsive  and selfish ways;  he  seems serious   he  is sober. The message  he  sends is that  his  family   his  party  and all the other institutions that nurtured  him  still have an innate and positive utility  an essential role to play. Where Trump says the rot must be amputated   Joe III  promises that a strong dose of antibiotics is all that's needed.
Whether this message resonates among the Democratic rank-and-file is another story. While the liberal commentariat   Joe III's  natural constituency  remains fixated on norms and the need to defend institutions  a newly ascendant left sees civility as a neoliberal plot to uphold the status quo. And whereas  Joe III  and  his  ilk see Trump as an aberration  the left sees  him  as a symptom of a decayed political order  they  wish to abolish and replace.
Robert Kennedy once said that he wished he had been born poor so he could have been a revolutionary. As his career advances  Joe III might harbor a similar desire  if only because his party is increasingly moving in a revolutionary direction.

Output: yes


Input: Consider Input: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Clinton is Negative . Trump  tweeting Sunday  wrote about the "Uranium to Russia deal" in a string of criticisms about the Clintons and Democrats.
Trump has discussed the agreement on numerous occasions â including an October 2016 campaign event when he said that  Hillary Clinton  "gave Russia 20% of American uranium  and  you know   she  was paid a fortune."
Trump's renewed focus on  the deal  is seen by many as a distraction tactic amid the Robert Mueller-led investigation into possible Russian collusion with members of his campaign during the 2016 election.
Trump claims Clinton  Dems are the ones who colluded with Russia
Here's the full story about the uranium deal â and how the Clintons are involved.
President Obama had final approval of  the deal . (JIM WATSON/AFP/Getty Images)
With help from  Bill Clinton 's connections  Canadian mining tycoon Frank Giustra in 2005 was able to secure a key uranium mining deal in Kazakhstan for his company UrAsia Energy. Months later  according to a New York Times report  Giustra donated more than $30 million to  Clinton 's foundation â donations that remained secret for years. Uranium One obtained UrAsia Energy in 2007.
In 2008  then-President George W. Bush's administration reached a nuclear cooperation agreement with Russia  but  the deal  was withdrawn from Senate consideration after Russia attacked Georgia.
Through  the deal   Rosatom â Russia's nuclear agency â gained a majority stake in Uranium One  and with it control of nearly 20% of the U.S. national uranium extraction capacity.
Under  the deal   no uranium at U.S. mines can be exported  except for some uranium yellowcake  which was later returned to the United States.
As Secretary of State  Hillary Clinton  among other members of the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States  would have input over the deal. But the approval rested with Obama   not Clinton .
 Clinton 's campaign  DNC funded research in Trump dossier: report
Clintons gain
People connected with Uranium One donated $145 million to  the Clinton Foundation   much of  it  before the deal was reached  and  Bill Clinton  also got $500 000 from a Kremlin-linked bank for a speech in Moscow.
With help from  Bill Clinton 's connections  Canadian mining tycoon Frank Giustra in 2005 was able to secure a key uranium mining deal in Kazakhstan for his company UrAsia Energy. (Theo Wargo/Getty Images)
Those donations weren't initially disclosed â despite  Hillary Clinton  signing a memorandum of understanding â and  the Clinton Foundation  apologized.


Output: yes