In this task, you're given a pair of sentences, sentence 1 and sentence 2. Your job is to determine if the two sentences clearly agree/disagree with each other, or if this can't be determined. Indicate your answer as yes or no respectively.

Sentence 1: Was Toobin's own judgment distorted by his presumably large Random House advance? Sentence 2: Toobin was preoccupied by other matters.
no

Sentence 1: Originally the post was simply an inter-city letter service. Sentence 2: The post used to be just for inter-city communications.
yes

Sentence 1: In Hong Kong, the South China Morning Post said in an editorial that vacillation over tax cuts had cost Hashimoto his job. Sentence 2: The South China Morning Post said that vacillation over tax cuts had was responsible for Hashimoto's promotion.

yes