instruction:
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
question:
Like I said, even if she is a tramp, *that* has nothing to do with the crimes.    But when trying to converse with someone who reverts to schoolyard name calling, it's a futile conversation.
answer:
Yes


question:
I'm tired of reading from various prominent state leaders, not the legislators, that we need "new revenue."  OK, Fran, what new revenue?  You've served in plenty of high caliber appointed position inside and outside of Alaska, surely you can do better than beat around the bush.  The only new revenue that's been kicked around in op-eds is taxes:  Tax the PFD, income tax, education head tax ranging from $100-$500 depending on one's income, additional fuel tax, marijuana tax, more cigarette tax, and a statewide sales tax.  No on new revenue taxes until the Legislature cuts $50 million from its own budget, and repeals SB21 tax credits.
answer:
No


question:
The only safeguard "regular" citizens have against the powerful is a more powerful governance. It is incredible that "conservatives" cannot seem to understand it. We are in a very strange and unique (among all other people upon this earth) position wherein close-to-a-majority of regular working-class Americans have so become worshipful of the rich and powerful that they somehow have become accustomed to identify with their "oppressors" goals. 
If denying people health care, good schools, and safe neighborhoods isn't oppression, what the heck is?
answer:

Yes