In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: threat and non-threat. Threat is a statement that someone will be hurt or harmed, especially if the person does not do something in particular.
--------
Question: Comment: When you boss tells you are suppose to work and you DO NOT , HE CAN FIRE YOU !!When the owner expects you to stand and you DON'T he can FIRE YOU !

Answer: Threat


Question: Comment: Isn't Rush the (other) big fat lying idiot complaining that warnings about Irma are sensationalism and people should generally not listen?

"Left" is wingnut speak for "rational" and "fact-based." Reality is facts that still remain facts even if you don't believe in them; all else is opinion.  And Rush deals solely in opinion.

Answer: Non-threat


Question: Comment: Prior to the advent of comments being posted on news articles, the public had very few avenues for stating its point of view on a matter written up. I remember in the day that letters to the editor - if you could get yours printed - was like winning the lottery considering the high wall of critique a editorial editor would put on those letters, especially those with a different point of view. So, in looking forward, today's forums allow for many more to provide their input into a subject. 

Now whether that opinion is good or not, I think any opinion put out on this is as valuable as the next opinion. Those who post way more than I should understand that. 

But one thing is for sure, don't let forums like this get so regulated so that a faceless, nameless newspaper bureaucrat determines what should be said in comments, and what should not. That will definitely happen should comments here degenerate into personal attacks and Il Duce-type posturing on issues.

Answer:
Non-threat