In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: toxic and non-toxic. Toxicity is defiend as anything that is rude, disrespectful, or unreasonable that would make someone want to leave a converation.

[Q]: Comment: We get along Booz, but where does your personal responsibility come in?  

I saw you post some really good stuff a few weeks ago that had no bashing of others, no insults ect...      Very few people have been censored on this site, what makes your writing less civil?
[A]: Non-toxic


[Q]: Comment: "I bet you will hear that Trent is no longer in force...."

lol. Before predicting things, ashpenaz, read DISPUTATIONS CONCERNING THE CHRISTIAN FAITH, by Robert Bellarmine, S.J., in which work he argues forcefully for the rationality of Catholic theology against Lutheranism and Calvinism. I doubt Francis will ditch his fellow Jesuit's brilliant work for "Lutheran sacraments or ordinations" or for Luther's two Catechisms (never seriously taken as works of academic theology). I am sure, too, Luther's understanding of the role of the "godly prince," which effectively insisted that a monarch had total control of the church, would not sit well with him (as it didn't sit well with republican Calvin). Your predictions seem to have more affinity within your heart, wanting to assure some pseudo- event, than with current ecumenical theology. You mean well, but prediction is not a pastoral remedy.
[A]: Non-toxic


[Q]: Comment: Coyotes
[A]:
Non-toxic