In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Ex Input:
Comment: Yes a PM who was put in place by the establishment, the same establishment that gave us Kathleen!!!!

Truly its only been a year and what do we see: Allllll key campaign promises broken, sky rocketing energy cost, expensive weak immigration policy's, soaring housing cost, out of control debt, zero foreign policy's, conflict of interest charges  and multiple lavish vacations in one year!!!!

Yes Canada is back

IF f i voted for change I would be sick to my stomach.

 SIMPLY PUT, GOVERNMENT WON THE ELECTRON AND TAX PAYERS LOST!!!!!!!!

Ex Output:
Non-obscene


Ex Input:
Comment: Thanks for the historical perspective. Always worth while.
Whom the gods would destroy they first drive mad. We already have the  mad part of Trump covered.

Ex Output:
Non-obscene


Ex Input:
Comment: H.I. might be talking about Sitka Alder or Green Alder, while you are probably referring to Red Alder.  I agree that they might do well to give Red Alder a shot.  It grows pretty quickly into a nice hardwood tree with commercial potential.  Sitka or Green Alder, on the other hand, are pretty much weeds.

Ex Output:

Non-obscene