We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

Ex Input:
It evolved into a discussion about how a violent encounter was (by some) preferable to be entered with fists rather than guns, as it would be less dangerous.

Ex Output:
Valid


Ex Input:
In my view I think that complete gun control helps solve a major problem in crime and it would allow people to feel safer because they wouldn't need to have a gun to protect themselves.

Ex Output:
Valid


Ex Input:
Perhaps if school grounds were more like prisons, with locking gates and electronic monitoring and guard towers and barbed wire fences and random pat downs and metal detectors, then maybe killings on school grounds would be less likely to happen.

Ex Output:

Valid