Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.

Input: Consider Input: "Walker administration predicts there will be $357 million in carried forward credits at the end of the fiscal year June 30...revenue forecasts predict the companies could use the credits to offset about $750 million from their bills before writing checks to the state again."  How there be $357M in credits and those credits translate to $750M?  I don't get it.  Can someone please explain?  Thanks

Output: No


Input: Consider Input: The best part of the ACA is that patients could not be denied for existing conditions.  Previously, those patients with seriously expensive conditions were mostly paid through medicare and medicaid paid by the State and the Feds.  Under ACA the really expensive patients got their insurance.  The only difference is that the entire cost of their coverage is born by other ACA rate payers.  23,000 people, roughly 10% of insured people statewide, are paying the entire costs of our most expensive patients.  This is a good bill and should be a priority.

Output: No


Input: Consider Input: Nutter!


Output: Yes