TASK DEFINITION: In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine the neutral choice based on your inference from the statement and your commonsense knowledge. The neutral choice is a sentence that neither agrees nor disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3', corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence. If sentence X agrees with sentence Y, one's correctness follows from the other one. If sentence X disagrees with sentence Y, they can not be correct at the same time.
PROBLEM: Statement: Increased fuel economy achieved by a reduction of engine deposits is estimated to be over $295 million for the same time period. Choices: 1. There has been a decrease in the fuel economy. 2. The engine deposits cause cars to be fuel inefficient. 3. Almost $295 million in fuel cost savings have been achieved.

SOLUTION: 2

PROBLEM: Statement: But Pol Pot is irredeemable. Choices: 1. Pol Pot can never be redeemed.  2. Pol pot is irredeemable because it is too old.  3. Pol Pot is redeemable. 

SOLUTION: 2

PROBLEM: Statement: Like Jon, his head was shaved. Choices: 1. Jon had a shaved head. 2. Jon had shaved his head because of lice. 3. Jon had long, flowing hair.

SOLUTION:
2