Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.

[Q]: I revere your/our right to free speech Paul because it allows me to point out how wrong your "argument" is.

January 2016 poll:  "Do you favor or oppose a federal law requiring background checks on all potential gun buyers?"
CBS News/New York Times Poll. Jan. 7-10, 2016. N=1,276 adults nationwide. Margin of error ± 3

Republicans
Favor 85% Oppose 12%; No answer/unsure; 3%   
  
Democrats
Favor 97%; Oppose 3%    
  
Independents
Favor 84%; Oppose 12%; No answer/unsure; 4% 
--------------------------
One issue Republicans and Democrats agree on is campaign finance reform:

https://sunlightfoundation.com/blog/2015/12/18/one-issue-republicans-and-democrats-agree-on-campaign-finance-reform/

76 percent of respondents (including identical shares of Republicans and Democrats) say money has a greater role in politics than in the past.

84 percent of Democrats and 72 percent and Republicans favor limiting the amount of money individuals and organizations can spend on campaigns and issues.
[A]: No


[Q]: Alex,
     How many of your remarks are true? Right from Pebbles own website they are only claiming up to 1000 jobs that will last from 20 to 25 years. Then what? Look at Detroit or Pittsburgh after their economy's turned down. And they had more than one industry to fall back on. It happens everywhere, when the industry dries up and the company's leave, it is left up to the local people and tax payers to clean up the mess left behind. Why risk one of the greatest unspoiled places on Earth so a very few people can make a little more money?
[A]: No


[Q]: Exactly.  Gun owners are neato.
[A]:
No