In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

[Q]: Comment: This story is about a left wing black man who "expresses disdain for President Donald Trump and white people generally." I'm not sure about the purpose of your rant.
[A]: Identity-attack


[Q]: Comment: All of the sarcastic remarks about radical Christian extremism are offered in an attempt to get people to think about the fallacy of attributing all violence by committed by Muslims or people loosely connect with Islam to Islamic terrorism.  Christians are responsible for the holocaust and Christians dropped the atom bomb and Christians have exploited people all over the world  using some the most brutal means to to accomplish their goals that the world has ever seen.  Here in Alaska Christians decimated Native populations thru disease and brutality and raped countless children all the while  forcing the Christian god on them.  Christians bombed the federal building in OK.  I am offering this up because if you want to make a case against Christians there is plenty of fodder.  I happen to believe it is a lot more complex than the things I have outlined above.  But never forget there is a strong case to be made against the white devils.  Think about it.
[A]: Identity-attack


[Q]: Comment: Just watch the mud slinging from the NDP now.  They know they are finished.  Should be entertaining.  I think Justin peed himself a little lol.
[A]:
Non-identity-attack