Given a document, find the main entity about whom the author is writing. Write the full name if mentioned in the text. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].
--------
Question: I saw two No. 33  Matt Harvey  jerseys  and I had to make a pilgrimage to find those. This is 2018  after all  not 2013  when  Harvey  lit up the baseball sky in New York  or 2015  when  his  first return from injury was a mostly triumphant welcome-home  all the way to the ninth inning of Game 5 of the World Series.
In 2018   Matt Harvey  is just another pitcher about to enter  his  walk year without a surplus of statistics to make that journey palatable. There are dozens of players just like  him  in Florida and Arizona  guys who once burned brightly and now hope to rediscover that magic  somehow  under the February sun.
âWe can rely on  Matt Harvey  â Mets manager Mickey Callaway said after the Mets were done beating the Braves  6-4  before they could dash to the bus and make the two-hour slog back to Port St. Lucie.
Those six words arenât exactly what you ever thought would pass as good news for  Harvey  before the shoulder went  and before the elbow went  and before  he  spent 2017 ducking out of the way of line drives when  he  wasnât burying  his  alarm clock under  his  pillow.
But this is 2018  and this was a good day for  Harvey . There was one run allowed in two innings  two strikeouts  one walk  a bunch of pitches that hit 95 on the gun and one that hit 96. Mostly  there was a sense that for the first time in a long time   Harvey  had an idea where the ball was going. And for the first time in a long time  the ball actually arrived where  he  intended it to go.
âIâm happy with the outing â  Harvey  said. âIâm looking forward to continuing this more in the spring.â
 His  spring debut was greeted with a fair amount of cheering â but nothing at all compared to the moment a few innings later  when Tebow dug into the batterâs box as a pinch hitter (he grounded into a double play). The roars belong elsewhere now. Harvey Day  even one in the sleepy background of spring  is no longer a happening but more of a pilot episode for one of the core series on SNY: âOh  Yeah â¦â
And if you remember what that version of  Harvey  was like â and youâre a fan of the player  the team  or just baseball itself â there has to be a part of you that hopes Wednesday was the first step toward something resembling a renaissance.
There has to be a part of you that noticed just how much  Harvey  enjoyed facing Freddie Freeman  the Bravesâ brilliant first baseman  in the bottom of the first inning  one out and a man on first â and how much striking Freeman out looking on a 94-mph heater on the black gave him a noticeable jolt.
âWeâve gotten to be good friends though the years â  Harvey  said of Freeman  âand itâs always nice to be on the positive end facing him.â
He answered a dozen questions politely but dully  part of that being the Metsâ strategy to drain whenever possible whatever passes for colorful in their clubhouse. But thatâs probably the wise course for  Harvey  to take anyway.  He  wasnât a razor-sharp wit back in the day  but  he  did say a thing or three that rose to the level of interesting.
These days   he  seems committed to keeping  his  head down   his  mouth shut and  his  name off the disabled list and out of Page Six. Thereâs a lot of steps in that journey after this one. But it was a good place to start.

Answer: Matt Harvey


Question: Even after Senate Republicans scrapped the vote on  the Graham-Cassidy bill  this week  lead  sponsor Sen. Lindsey Graham  R-S.C.   said  he  remains optimistic about the legislation eventually passing because the missing votes were âactually more about process than substance.â
âWith more hearings  with regular order  weâre going to get 50 votes â  Graham  said during a press conference Tuesday. âWeâre going to fulfill our promise.â
Former Sen. Rick Santorum  who has for some reason or another partnered with  Graham  in this effort  told The Intercept on Tuesday afternoon that  he  is confident Sen. Lisa Murkowski  a key Republican holdout from Alaska  will come around next year if  the bill  goes through the normal committee process. âI know having talked to Lisa just a couple hours ago  she thinks itâs a good idea and she thinks the idea will stand up under public scrutiny  and it makes it an easier vote for everybody â  he  said.
 Graham  and  his  co-conspirators previously said  they  would demand that tax cuts and health care reform be lumped together if  they  failed to make headway on health care in September. But on Tuesday   Graham  changed course  saying  he  is now willing to let tax reform go ahead on its own because  he  had been unaware how complex tying the two together would be. Then  in the spring   Graham  said   he  will insist on a new budget resolution that allows for another crack at repeal using a 50-vote threshold â what is called budget reconciliation in the Senate.
In her statement released after the bill was officially yanked from the floor  Murkowski did indeed express openness to the framework Graham and co-sponsor Sen. Bill Cassidy had constructed. âI recognize the status quo with health care in this country is unacceptable. Giving control back to the states and flexibility are ideas I can get behind â she said. âBut substance matters and the ability to validate data matters.â
This is where it gets macabre. McCain  a key ânoâ vote  is living with a brain cancer diagnosis that is nearly always fatal. The same cancer took the life of his good friend  Sen. Ted Kennedy  and almost upended the push to pass the Affordable Care Act  after Scott Brown filled his seat. Were McCain to lose his battle with cancer  Arizonaâs GOP governor would appoint a Republican rubber stamp. Depending on the circumstances  some Republicans  such as McCainâs best friend Graham  may oppose rushing forward with repeal on pure human decency grounds.

Answer: Graham


Question: After bloody clashes between the Thai army and opposition demonstrators killed some 90 people in the center of Bangkok in May  the unelected government of Prime Minister Abhisit Vejjajiva promised to launch what he called a "national reconciliation plan." Since then authorities have arrested hundreds of opposition leaders; closed media; frozen the bank accounts of suspected supporters of the Bangkok demonstrations and brought terrorism charges against the movement's exiled leader  Thaksin Shinawatra.
 On July 6  Mr. Abhisit renewed a state of emergency in Bangkok and 18 other provinces  allowing his regime to arrest and hold people without charge  censor the media and prevent public gatherings. Meanwhile  he has announced that the parliamentary elections he had offered to hold in November will be postponed until next year. If this is what he calls "national reconciliation " Mr. Abhisit  a graduate of Eton and Oxford  must have taken a lesson in Orwellian language.
 Mr. Thaksin and the red shirts have contributed to Thailand's impasse by blockading the center of Bangkok for two months last spring and for refusing the compromise Mr. Abhisit offered before the violence began and the army moved in. But the root cause of the troubles is the refusal of the traditional political class  the military and the royal court  which Mr. Abhisit's government represents  to accept the results of democratic elections.
 Repression will not solve this problem. If Mr. Abhisit really wants reconciliation  the steps he must take are clear: End the state of emergency  release the red shirt leaders and negotiate leading to elections  with a commitment by all sides to allow the winners to rule within the boundaries of a reformed constitution.

Answer:
Abhisit