In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

Q: Comment: Funny how libtards cry unconstitutional only when it benefits their insane agenda!  It is perfect the way it is thanks to the white authors!  Blacks and browns are just parasitic riders...

A: Identity-attack
****
Q: Comment: "It doesn't keep elections 'pure' it just drives the money into STUPID AREAS"

Well, that's a useful bunch of gibberish. It's not like there aren't elections all around the world with campaign finance laws that work quite well.

"You want to get good candidates get rid of every restriction BUT the REPORTING requirements."

Here's a better idea: leave every candidate with limited but equal financing -- so that candidates focus solely on explaining why their policy is superior to all others -- and every citizen, whether billionaire or hobo has but one equal voice.

It's "one man one vote" not "one dollar one vote."

A: Non-identity-attack
****
Q: Comment: Wanna bet that 98% of Canadians don't have a clue about this drug nor its administration .

So who did these folks poll?

Naw.
Not more fake news..

A:
Non-identity-attack
****