In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: threat and non-threat. Threat is a statement that someone will be hurt or harmed, especially if the person does not do something in particular.

[EX Q]: Comment: I find those who chant do so because they either have such a slim argument that they don't want to be drawn into it, or because they lack the mental prowess to mount their argument in a rational manner.  It is for that reason that the "Lock her up," chant is offensive.  

I should point out too that the main perpetrators of the chanting phenomenon are unionists, "Hey, Hey  Ho, Ho.  Fill-in-the-blank has got to go!"   Clever eh?   The "progressives" particularly the enviro-nuts, are no better,  “U.G.L.Y.  Corporate scum you cheat you lie.  You UGLY, uh, uh, you UGLY.”   That intellectual gem and many others are found on the website tarsandsblockade.org

Chanting has no place in rational debate, none.
[EX A]: Non-threat

[EX Q]: Comment: Wholesome Goodness/Wholesome Idiot...... McCain has more integrity and brains in one of his little fingers then you have in your whole body. What are you basing your bashing on? Your Man love for, Trump, or your hatred for, McCain, as he stands up for his fellow citizens. Any sane person can see that, what Trump has put on the table, will/would hurt millions. I am sure your family must be very proud of you as you let your, Man Love, step in between common sense and decency.
[EX A]: Non-threat

[EX Q]: Comment: Trump fans remind me of the ditzy wife that can't accept that her husband is a philandering, lying lowlife.
[EX A]:
Non-threat