In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

[EX Q]: Sentence: Dan had to stop Bill from toying with the injured bird. He is very cruel.
 Reason: The 'He' refers to bill because Bill was toying with the bird; he must be the one being cruel. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
[EX A]: Correct

[EX Q]: Sentence: Sam pulled up a chair to the piano, but it was broken, so he had to stand instead.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the chair because it was the only one that was in the room. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
[EX A]: Wrong

[EX Q]: Sentence: The city councilmen refused the demonstrators a permit because they advocated violence.
 Reason: The 'they' refers to the demonstrators because the organizers of the event are anti-police and white supremacist. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
[EX A]:
Wrong