In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

[Q]: Comment: “There would be no deadly terror attacks in the U.K. if Muslims didn’t live there.”
The families of the thousands killed in the UK by the IRA and protestant radicals might disagree.
[A]: Identity-attack


[Q]: Comment: Heck, why don't we just do away with saying "human"..and just note the birth of a "being".  Ridiculous.....
[A]: Non-identity-attack


[Q]: Comment: If Pell is already convicted of those crimes, why then do you want to make up other ridiculous accusations as well? You are trivializing the crimes you mention by chasing the red herrings that Julia Yost demolishes. No doubt you hope for the prosecutors to reveal new, more substantial allegations, but the prosecutors themselves  have aready said that they are pessimistic about their chances of securing a conviction. So why not focus on the charges you mention, of failure to protect young people, rather than distract from them by these Salemesque fantasies? Your screaming of "hell!" and "devil!" makes you sound like a character from The Crucible or from The Devils (Russell movie).
[A]:
Non-identity-attack