Given a paragraph about movies and a set of conversational questions and answers about the paragraph, say whether the passage contains sufficient information to answer the follow-up question. Say Yes if it is answerable; otherwise, say No. The paragraph has the prefix 'CONTEXT:'. Each conversation question has a prefix `Q:` followed by the answer prefix `A:`, and the follow-up question has a prefix `FOLLOWUP_Q:`.

Q: CONTEXT: Her objective is to ensure Palmer is killed - and Jack is the best way to get the phone bomb close to him. The Drazens planned this but saw an opportunity to get Alexis free by trading him for Jack. Therefore Nina basically has to get Alexis free for the Drazen to make the final assasination attempt  <sep>  Q: Why does Nina Myers call Palmer in episode 22 to help save Jack from the Drazens?

A: Yes
****
Q: CONTEXT: Of course this changes from country to country, but generally speaking it's not illegal to film on the streets, since it's a public area. Most car scenes are recorded with chroma just for pratical reasons. In a professional production you look for "quality" and you can achieve it only if you have control. It's all about control. With a studio setting you get full control of the lights, the movements, etc. in one word, the scene. And of course, you minimize the hitches that can occurs in the real world (also safety concers). However you should film outdoor shots to enrich and give credibility to your scene.  <sep>  Q: Why are most scenes in a car recorded with chroma? A: Most car scenes are recorded with chroma just for pratical reasons  Q: What reasons are those? A: In a professional production you look for "quality" and you can achieve it only if you have control. It's all about control  Q: Is it illegal to film while driving in a public place? A: Of course this changes from country to country, but generally speaking it's not illegal to film on the streets, since it's a public area  Q: Are there any safety concerns when filming? A: you minimize the hitches that can occurs in the real world (also safety concers  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Is there anything else you can tell me on this subject?

A: Yes
****
Q: CONTEXT: I don't think it had any plot driven change. The Bond franchise was feeling threatened by newer spy movies (such as the Bourne series) which have more action, (slightly) more plausible plots (compared to ray-gun satellites etc), and have less comedic elements. A reboot with a new younger actor and a deliberate step away from some of the conventions of the franchise (gadgets & moneypenny for example) were their answer. They tried to take it this direction before - a Licence to Kill was a deliberate attempt with a drug-smuggling and revenge plot-line, but wasn't well done. They then decided to switch back to more 'classic' Bond approaches with Brosnan.  <sep>  Q: Why is James Bond less tech savvy in the Daniel Craig movies? A: The Bond franchise was feeling threatened by newer spy movies (such as the Bourne series) which have more action  Q: What changes were made to make the movies more like the Bourne series? A: a new younger actor and a deliberate step away from some of the conventions of the franchise (gadgets & moneypenny for example  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: What changes were made to the gadgets?

A:
No
****