In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: toxic and non-toxic. Toxicity is defiend as anything that is rude, disrespectful, or unreasonable that would make someone want to leave a converation.

[Q]: Comment: Nag nag nag
[A]: Non-toxic


[Q]: Comment: An idiot named Hillary happened
[A]: Toxic


[Q]: Comment: You obviously have not read M103. It condemns all forms of discrimination"
Here’s what it proposes (from Global News):

The government should recognize the need to “quell the increasing public climate of hate and fear.”
The government should “condemn Islamophobia and all forms of systemic racism and religious discrimination.”
The Standing Committee on Canadian Heritage should look at how the government could develop an “approach to reducing or eliminating systemic racism and religious discrimination including Islamophobia” and collect data to “contextualize hate crime reports.”
The committee should present its findings and recommendations to Parliament within 240 days.


So basically, if the motion passes, a committee will study how to better tackle religious discrimination in Canada. That’s it.
[A]:
Non-toxic