In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

[Q]: Comment: Indians are the most depressing people in the world . All they do is complain yet it is Indians running most of these child services.
[A]: Identity-attack


[Q]: Comment: Peter: The reason why it's difficult to take deal with issues raised in the letter is that the writer is largely dealing in hyperbole and bromides.  

Here's an example: "Trump’s tax cuts would increase investment, boost productivity and wages and increase innovation and opportunities for all Americans." That's silly. Tax cuts for the super-wealthy don't result in any of those things (or if they do the effect is neglible). The Bush tax cuts sure didn't result in that stuff. 

Most of the other statement are similar. Just a whole bucket of simplistic statements with little regard for the complexity of any of these issues.
[A]: Non-identity-attack


[Q]: Comment: These repetive, slogan-based, verified propaganda are brought to you by publis, the shilliest shill that ever licked a boot or browned a nose. "His" glee is uncontainable in just one cliche. It is almost amusing to watch publis gush but for the sadness he will suffer when Scarecrow and he see behind the curtain
[A]:
Non-identity-attack