TASK DEFINITION: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.
PROBLEM: Comment: The meaning of the slang aside, young men are virgins and women pop their "cherries" frequently with happy outcomes for all concerned. "Daddy" does not exclusively denote an actual father but more frequently alludes to an archetypical, and let's be honest here, Oedipal desire. 
In my opinion, the name has more to do with eroticism than sexual assault which is not at all "sexy". Dragging the name "Trump" into the discussion is definitely something that kills an erection--especially the female variety. Clearly, many heterosexual men have boners for Trump. Lol, what turns some men on intelligent women will never understand.

SOLUTION: Sexual-explicit

PROBLEM: Comment: Misuse by the user.

Yup. Cause aaaallll those users, they just went right out and got pills from the local grocery store.

Oh no! Wait! They were given prescriptions by uninformed, misinformed, ignorant, and willingly ignorant, mis-prescribing physicians.

Let's put the damn blame where it really belongs--on the "supply" end, which ended up creating a "demand" end.

SOLUTION: Non-sexual-explicit

PROBLEM: Comment: Prisoners subjected to solitary confinement, patients shackled in mental health institutions, people forced to endure untold suffering through illness and injury before assisted suicide was legalized - all state sanctioned torture. Should taxpayers not compensate all of THEM? If the government isn't about to do that, why is Khadr getting special treatment even though he is a murderer?

SOLUTION:
Non-sexual-explicit