We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Sent1: In order to have a 'well regulated' militia you can not bar the civilian populace of its right to keep and bear arms!
 Sent2: Deny, if you can, that your previous position defined the phrase ���right to keep and bear arms�۝ as a right of the states to equip the militias with both arms and ammunition.
Similar

Sent1: It involved a ban of guns within a certain proximity to schools.
 Sent2: Well, not all colleges are government institutions and our government has traditionally banned guns from certain locations not in violation of the 2nd amendment.
Not similar

Sent1: But the argument that stricter gun laws in areas with more people from minority groups shows that gun control is racist is also entirely circumstantial.
 Sent2: But it appears that support for gun control is higher when people are asked about specific gun laws rather than just a general question about stricter gun control.

Not similar