We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

[EX Q]: Sent1: You might say the criminal deserved it, but murder is murder, whether they deserved it or not.
 Sent2: Only if they try to murder somebody after they are in prison do they deserve the death penalty?
[EX A]: Not similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: The death penalty has never been shown to be a deterent to murder.
 Sent2: If the death penalty were an adequate deterrent then we would not have murder.
[EX A]: Similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: One way that would make me happy with the death penalty is if the person was killed in the same way as the person that they murdered.
 Sent2: I have been a victim of rape and if I were a victim of murder I would not desire the death penalty for the perpetrator.
[EX A]:
Not similar