The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.

[Q]: Context: 'im sorry i mistyped. okay yes thats a deal. so last we have to talk about the wood. what do you think' 'Oh yes, sorry I am so caught up with my wound I completely forgot about that. I can spare 1 firewood so you would get 2, do you think you could spare another water in exchange for the wood?' 'i cant unfortunately i really need the two water im sorry. '
Utterance: 'im so sorrry unfortunately i am in dire need of two wood we are in a very cold climate'
[A]: Yes


[Q]: Context: 'With the cool weather in degrees lower than expected, my family of 7 are consuming firewood faster than expected. Thus, I would like all the firewood in exchange for the food' 'Oh ok, that will be great. How about the water? Is 2 for me and 1 for you ok?' 'How about 2 for me 🙂'
Utterance: 'I have 3 kids with me who are always thirsty but we can negotiate for it'
[A]: Yes


[Q]: Context: 'hello' 'Do you have a preference for any extra items for your camping trip?' 'yes. i need 2 pack of firewood, 2 pack of water and 1 pack of food'
Utterance: 'I need 3 packs of firewood, 2 packs of food and 3 packs of water.  My husband and I are diabetic, so we're cold-natured, need regular meals and hydration.'
[A]:
Yes