Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.

Example Input: That's because of the Salem legislators who pushed through high density planning statewide in 1986. What blows my mind is the republicans in rural counties went along with this, when had they not adopted high density planning all the jobs and growth would have gone to rural counties that need it the most.
Example Output: No

Example Input: Something you may be missing, Elmore.  If a dog charges, people react differently depending on circumstances like whether they are accompanied by defenseless children, who can be eviscerated in an instant.  Any parent who would trust their child's welfare to the goodwill of an agitated animal is not a fit parent.   Interjecting yourself into the scenario, and claiming you would slam the door, or kick the dog is nothing more than Monday-morning quarterbacking, since you did not witness the circumstances.  There are a lot of hysterical commenters here who would rather see you face down a grizzly bear empty-handed, then blame you for smelling like food, or not following their bear-wise precautions.  I'm talking about the backwards-thinking people who commend killing the unborn, then over-compensate through fanatical defense of animals: a cowardly position which costs them nothing, and still lets them feel like Gandhi.
Example Output: Yes

Example Input: Except this trash was left all around/in a natural environment. Homeless camps and the homeless population in Portland are not comparable at all to this situation. And there was obviously a lot more left behind than "some guy leaving a cooler"...wouldn't you say? In which case....are homeless camps just "some guy leaving his sleeping bag under the bridge"? What's the big deal either way, huh?
Example Output:
Yes