Given a document, an entity and its sentiment towards the entity, verify if it is the correct sentiment towards the entity. Answer should be yes or no. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

Q: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Josh McDaniels is Positive . Tuesday morning  Peter Schrager of FoxSports.com and NFL Networkâs Good Morning Football reported that  New England Patriots offensive coordinator Josh McDaniels  would break routine and skip this weekâs annual NFL Combine in Indianapolis  avoiding the city McDaniels jilted when  he  backed out on a verbal agreement to become the Coltsâ next head coach on Feb. 6  leaving many of  his  assistants in the lurch  too.
And the McDaniels news was a reminder that while itâs too early to judge Pat Shurmur as a head coach  the Giantsâ hiring of  him  certainly feels as if itâs put them in the strongest and most stable position they could have hoped for to operate at this Combine â and in free agency and in Aprilâs draft â especially considering the alternatives.
Imagine if the Giants had chosen  McDaniels  to be their next head coach and  McDaniels  had backed out on the Giants on Feb. 6  as he did the Colts. The Giants wouldnât have hired their next coach until two weeks ago at best  as the Colts did by pivoting to Eagles offensive coordinator Frank Reich. And the Giants in that scenario probably wouldnât have their full coaching staff together yet still  and theyâd be arriving at the Combine still in transition mode.
Perhaps most importantly  a negative perception of the Giantsâ operations may have lingered if  McDaniels  had reversed course on them. Fairly or unfairly  that would have had people connecting the turmoil of 2017 to an ominous and bad start to 2018  continuing to question the Giantsâ judgment for trying to hire someone who wasnât even ready.
Josh McDaniels. (Maddie Meyer/Getty Images)

A: yes
****
Q: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Muhammad Ali is Positive . By 1996   Muhammad Ali  didn't really need to supply us with more reasons to cheer for  him .  Ali   suffering from Parkinson's disease  had long proven  himself  to be one of the most iconic athletes in the world  and even if  Ali  didn't end up lighting the torch on July 19th  1996  we'd still have plenty of moments to treasure both in and out of the ring.
But as it happens  it was  Ali  who took the torch from Janet Evans  hands shaking  but proud as ever. The man who fought in some of the greatest fights in boxing history  was the subject of some of the most iconic images of the 20th century  and who changed this country in ways we're still feeling to this very day  had one more moment of greatness for the world to witness.
Related Chance the Rapper Honors  Muhammad Ali  With New Song Chicago MC delivers stirring performance with collaborators Donnie Trumpet  Jamila Woods
But as former NBC executive Dick Ebersol told Sports Business Journal last year  the head of the Atlanta committee for the games  Dick Payne  put up a fight  saying  "Where we're from  he's perceived as a draft dodger." Hometown hero Evander Holyfield was the local pick to do the honor  but Ebersol countered that  Ali  didn't dodge the draft: " He  lost three big-money-earning years. But he didn't run away from the country. He didnât go to Canada. He was willing to stand on his principles."
It took four months to convince Payne and the committee that  Ali  was the right person for the job  four months for them to agree that a person who Ebersol figured  "outside of perhaps the pope" was "the most beloved figure in the world."
Of course  eventually the committee agreed  and what happened when the champ and 1960 gold medal winner was handed the torch was truly a moment that is so perfect that it defies any sports cliche you could toss at it. A reminder  once again  why  Ali  was  and always will be the Greatest of All Time.

A: yes
****
Q: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Steve Bannon is Positive . But I am interested in something that comes closer to a conspiracy  the notion that  former White House Chief Strategist Steve Bannon  was kinda  sorta shoved out the door at the White House in August.
I donât believe it. I think that the âshoved out the doorâ meme was a cover story. After all  why signal the Democrats that something is up with: âTrump Sends  Bannon  Out to Elect Populists to Senate in 2018.â What would Sun Tzu say about that?
Itâs much better to promote  Bannon  as an unguided missile that is a bit too hot to handle at the White House. That way  if he fails to elect a bunch of populist economic nationalists to the Senate in 2018 you can say that he was really too much of a wild man to help the president. But if he succeeds in nuking the GOP establishment types  then you can open your eyes in wonder and say: wow  I had no idea! It just shows that there are millions of patriotic Americans out there that want to help the president Make America Great Again.
So now we see a range of stories appearing in the media. There is the standard Breitbart fare that  Bannon  will rout the establishment Republicans. Here is  Bannon  wowing California Republicans with this message.
Then there are confident Democratic predictions that  Bannon  is a gift to the Democrats that will deliver the Senate in 2018.
And while you are at it  you figure that it doesnât hurt to burnish your best manâs reputation as a crazy wild man by hinting to the NeverTrumpers that  Bannon  reads the notorious fascist theorist Julius Evola.
Yeah.  Thatâs the thing about Steve Bannon .  He  hasnât just done a lot in  his  life  from the Navy to finance to Hollywood.  He  also reads a lot.
The assumption that Breitbart made and  Bannon  makes is that you have to win the cultural battle before you can win the political battle.
Now  I assume that  Steve Bannon âs mind is fizzing with ideas  he  has read. Great  so  he  has ideas. But  Steve Bannon  is also a fearless Man of Action  if not a Man of Steel.
And one thing  Bannon  knows is that we cannot continue to kow-tow and apologize when the liberals use their cultural hegemony to brand you as a racist or a âwhite supremacistâ or the swamp brands you as an extremist. Politics is civil war by other means and the weapons of todayâs politics were forged years ago by some guy writing a book.

A:
yes
****