In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

[EX Q]: Comment: During the day I believe he went to prospective houses where he hoped to harm individuals, knocking on doors during the day where he asked for work.  He is an admitted liar.  He is manipulative producing his penciled writing.  It may be the cover story.  He is definitely a thug perhaps for political purposes.  He may not be who he presents himself at all.  He may just be an operative of some type perhaps a paid assassin.  How would you like him showing up at your door with your family there - while you are at work.  He may have.  Not buying his penciled story.  He is an admitted liar among other qualities.  He no doubt has his admirers and cohorts in various interests.  The one's he and his associates have not "mentioned".  Gullible reporting?  What's his military record?  I don't believe his story.  He is a bad character for sure.
[EX A]: Non-sexual-explicit

[EX Q]: Comment: Judging by the march in San Diego, it looked like the same audience that shows up to the usual feminist/LBGQT/black lives matter protests.  If you want to be taken seriously, probably best advisable to not wear a vagina costume.
[EX A]: Sexual-explicit

[EX Q]: Comment: Ottawa needs to see lots of videos about Saudi Arab and Muslim countries.  Like videos showing gay men being executed by throwing them  off buildings or  hanged. Or women getting buried alive if they are raped.  OR women being stoned to death or whipped for sex out of marriage. Or actual slaves being bought and sold for sex or labour.  Lets all have a good look at life in Saudi arabia.
[EX A]:
Sexual-explicit