In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

Example Input: Sentence: Bob paid for Charlie's college education, but now Charlie acts as though it never happened. He is very hurt.
 Reason: The 'He' refers to bob because He is very ungrateful Bob paid for Charlie's college education, but now Charlie acts as though it never happened. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Example Output: Correct

Example Input: Sentence: I couldn't put the pot on the shelf because it was too tall.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the pot because it is a good sized pot and I like the color of the pot. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Example Output: Wrong

Example Input: Sentence: Bob was playing cards with Adam and was way ahead. If Adam hadn't had a sudden run of good luck, he would have lost.
 Reason: The 'he' refers to adam because he got sudden run of good luck or else he would have lost. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Example Output:
Correct