In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

Q: Sentence: Dan took the rear seat while Bill claimed the front because his "Dibs!" was quicker.
 Reason: The 'his' refers to bill because he was the first to take the wheel, and as such, Bill was the first driver to take. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

A: Wrong
****
Q: Sentence: In the storm, the tree fell down and crashed through the roof of my  house. Now, I have to get it removed.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the tree because The trashed crashed through the roof: therefore the roof was broken and needed the repairs. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

A: Wrong
****
Q: Sentence: John promised Bill to leave, so an hour later he left.
 Reason: The 'he' refers to john because he is a child at heart, though his actions are probably the same as his father. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

A:
Wrong
****