We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

[Q]: Sent1: Some innocent people are still sentenced to death, and that's where I see a problem.
 Sent2: A perfect judiciary system would not sentence innocent people, and would alleviate all problems with the death penalty.
[A]: Not similar


[Q]: Sent1: People have been found out to be innocent after the death penalty ha already been carried out....
 Sent2: There has been so much cases of people who have been executed, only to be found innocent after their death.
[A]: Similar


[Q]: Sent1: killing a person, no matter the reason, is still murder.
 Sent2: if a person kills another person it is murder, whether it is sanctioned by the state or not.
[A]:
Similar