In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

[EX Q]: Comment: I think he'd have a better leg to stand on if he didn't suck so bad.
[EX A]: Sexual-explicit

[EX Q]: Comment: Yes, the VAGINA negates everything, unless it's being used for making more rethuglican rugrats, pleasure, or, on rare occasion, shooting Ping Pong balls.

At least that's how the GOP view women.
[EX A]: Sexual-explicit

[EX Q]: Comment: I'll just stick with John Climacus, Avila or de Sales, thank you.  Stupid sayings like, “Think of the sign of the cross; it’s a mudra. It’s a hand motion that opens us up to grace,” are the reasons people questions practices like this and whether those who promote these actually know what Catholicism  teaches.  Prior to suggesting something is in line with Catholic thought, a better understanding of Catholic thought may be in order.
[EX A]:
Non-sexual-explicit