We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

Q: Doctors make medical decisions for you because they have knowledge which the average person does not have.

A: Valid
****
Q: All that does is imply that crime rate depends on more than just the presence/absence of guns - it disproves 'more guns = more crime' about as much as it disproves 'more guns = less crime'.

A: Valid
****
Q: Law abiding citizens are not going to misuse their firearms and those with criminal records are already banned from owning guns.

A:
Valid
****