Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.

Example Input: Ian - actually the third reading clarified for me that the only folks winning in this are the attorneys and the Governor.  We will end in the weeds looking for who said whom could ask for what long before any valid action, like a judge recusing himself or the 'right' person having authority, is fully addressed.
Example Output: Yes

Example Input: I agree with using PF earnings to fund some government. I couldn't tell but it seemed the author was in favor of the status quo. He also seemed to advocate spending cuts(which I support but likely won't happen), and an income tax. 

Problem is, that ain't gonna do it. It would be a miracle if there were $500 million in spending cuts. Or perhaps a $500 million whack in oil taxes and credits. A combination of Income tax and sales tax might be good for 300 or 400 million dollars. You still have to find 2.5 billion somewhere...or hope like heck for $120 pb oil.

That's why I made the stupid post on purpose. I wanted to show how much income tax that wage and income earners would have to pay in a hypothetical to eliminate the deficit as it stands now. Because the 6% of federal liability would only cover around 2.5% of it, or around $100 million

Failed reading comprehension? I'll admit it was a weak subject for me. But something needs to change in the status quo with the PF and PFD.
Example Output: Yes

Example Input: Have they started putting urinals in the woman's locker room yet?
Example Output:
Yes