In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence can be inferred from the statement. Incorrect choices change the meaning in important ways or have details that are not mentioned in the statement. Indicate your answer as 1,2, or 3 corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.

Example Input: Statement: I am generally a fan of Michael Kinsley's, but I must take issue with his recent article, Social  From Ponzi Scheme to Shell Game. Choices:  1. Michael Kinsley's latest article raises some issues within me. 2. I loved everything about Michael Kinsley's newest article. 3. Despite causing some issues my opinion of MIchael Kinsley hasn't changed.
Example Output: 1

Example Input: Statement: He decided that Tuppence, in the throes of anxiety, had gone to the police, and that his disappearance having been made public the gang had not been slow to put two and two together. Choices:  1. The gang was after him for stealing their jewels and they thought that he was still missing.  2. He thought that Tuppence, being full of angst, went to law enforcement and that public knowledge of the fact that he was missing made public the group didn't put the two facts together.  3. Tuppence was content and lacked worry and didn't leave the house. 
Example Output: 2

Example Input: Statement: Defense  So could we. Choices:  1. Arming ourselves, we were good at that. 2. Protection, we were also capable. 3. We couldn't stand up against it.
Example Output:
2