In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.

Comment: Free speech can come with a cost to those who choose to speak freely and without thought of the possible consequences of such speech. We are asked here to ensure our speech is CIVIL. When it is not considered CIVIL it is removed. Using ones Facebook page for a platform to make racist comments can lead to consequences far greater than just having such comments removed. This young girl has lost the trust of many and has positioned herself undesirably to many of us regardless of the official outcome of all of this. She is now just a reminder of what Canada might become in the future. I suspect that is not what many of us want.
Agree

Comment: You need to have followed this disaster from the beginning to see that this current government was not the culprit.  Scheers defence of his former government's actions are indeed very weak. Under Canadian law Harper should have repatriated him much sooner and the financial damages would have been mitigated. 
Finally, Trudeau is correct a Canadian is a Canadian. There is also serious doubt that Khadr was the one who threw that grenade based on the forced confession the Americans imposed on him through torture. They have been discredited for that.
Disagree

Comment: News flash Margaret, the parents at Timmies for the most part do in fact care that the warming climate is a serious threat to their children's future! Who appointed you to speak on our behalf?

Cue the trolls.

Disagree