We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

[Q]: Sent1: So what does he have to do with a debate like this about murderers and the death penalty?
 Sent2: If the same murderer had been given the death penalty, and never released in the first place, he would not be able to kill again.
[A]: Not similar


[Q]: Sent1: As far as the deterrent argument, I have said this before, and I will say it again: There is no accurate way to measure if the death penalty is deterring crime or not.
 Sent2: I am pro-death penalty even though I conceed that every study I have seen suggests it does absolutely nothing to deter capitol crimes.
[A]: Similar


[Q]: Sent1: No matter how well the justice system works, we will always risk convicting innocent people.
 Sent2: If we don't stop the death penalty before we try to fix it, the imperfect system will continue to convict innocent people while we determine what is best for it.
[A]:
Similar