In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.
--------
Question: Comment: I'd like to get on-board with you Les, but don't you think the president bears some responsibility for the negativity you reference? Tweeting about "The media is the enemy of the American people". Silly nonsense about the size of the crowd at the inauguration and the actress Meryl Streep, etc. Banning some of the press from a news conference just because they challenge him on some of the things he says? (I don't think we elected him "King and Supreme Ruler of the Land"). 
From your letter: "Wouldn’t it be more wise and reasonable for negative citizens to consider the damage and distraction they are causing? Wouldn’t it be better to remember the simple phrase, “e pluribus unum?” To date, I think President Trump is one of those "negative citizens" you're talking about.
In his speech last night he seemed to turn it around. If the guy, through talk and ACTION (policies) starts behaving like he wants to be president of all the people (what he was elected to be), I'll get on-board with you.

Answer: Non-identity-attack


Question: Comment: What a crock! Scaremongering from an academic hoping if a disaster occurs in the markets, he can be the first to claim he predicted it.

Substitute "mutual funds" for ETFs and you have the same story - a bundle of assets packaged by a provider that includes a variety of holdings, all priced to their underlying value. Since MFs dominate ETFs by a factor of ten to one, why not apply the fear to a much bigger share of the investing world?

And by talking about a bundle of bonds in an ETF fund that masks the bad ones with the good ones -- just to draw an analogy to mispriced MBS -- makes it more ridiculous, because the bond rating services were responsible for treating the overall tranche without looking at the components in the ratings given to them. Deliberate and malicious incompetence, since the providers took out insurance to cover the losses on the products they fobbed off to the MBS purchasers, who suffered real losses from the mis-rating and had no cover.

Lousy analogy.

Answer: Non-identity-attack


Question: Comment: But remember: only Muslims can be "terrorists".  White Nationalists?  Um ... they're just "maladjusted".

Answer:
Identity-attack