In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: threat and non-threat. Threat is a statement that someone will be hurt or harmed, especially if the person does not do something in particular.

Example Input: Comment: (c)In summary, findings from this nationwide online survey
reveal strong links between age at first anal intercourse and
future sexual health and behaviour. In the sample presented in
this paper, those who became HIV positive, engaged in higher
risk sexual behaviour and reported other poorer sexual health
outcomes tended to have had their first anal intercourse at
a younger age than other men. With the median age of sexual
debut continuing to decline, clinicians and other health service
providers, as well as researchers, need to pay particular attention
to gay men’s earliest sexual experiences. In particular, men who
report having anal intercourse at a young age are likely to be at
heightened HIV vulnerability and therefore require additional
education and support for ensuring a healthier sex life. Further
education around safer sex practices that specifically targets gay identified
youth may also be required to ensure their sexual
debut does not lead to poorer sexual health outcomes.
Example Output: Non-threat

Example Input: Comment: "Additionally, the report found that forests in Southeast Alaska will capture more carbon going forward, though it is only a small region of the state."

Why? How? 
"going forward?" Please, let's kill this nonsensical and completely redundant idiom now.
Example Output: Threat

Example Input: Comment: Dick the butcher had it right: "The first thing we'll do, let's kill all the lawyers." How I wish. JZ wouldn't know a 'mala fide' action if it jumped up and bit him on the bum. These so called legal advisers are nothing more than merdivorous bottom feeders. Come the glorious day, let's have these traitors up against the wall!
Example Output:
Threat