Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.

[Q]: Boy, maybe we should make some roads in national forests so we can get some of the old dead trees (spelled fuel) on the ground that liberals locked up so long ago. Maybe if we were actually allowed to manage our forests, we would not have such a fire danger. Oh well, until then, Enjoy the weather!
[A]: No


[Q]: James, you are ignoring the fact that if the shoe had been on the other foot, and four MEN had violated an occupied WOMEN'S rest room, there would have been widespread media coverage and public outrage over the event.  That is called "hypocrisy", something which you apparently do not understand.
[A]: Yes


[Q]: It is all about personal taste and choice. I go to the Chowder Bowl every time I’m in town.  Have been for what seems like forever(+30 years).  Been to the Sea Hag a few times.  My last visit, I thought the chowder there sucked.  But hey, any trip up and down the beautiful Oregon coast eating chowder sounds wonderful to me.  I’m a chowder lover. P.S. Bacon is for BLT's.
[A]:
No