Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.

Example Input: Yep. As I thought, you can't quite get your facts right.

And, your attempt to finesse the "boundaries" issue doesn't fool anyone. I've posted the full comments below.

What a funny concept! "Intellectual bullying." Is the definition: "using superior [intellectual] strength or influence to intimidate someone who is [intellectually] weaker, typically to force him or her to do what one wants."?

Well, let's see -- the council vote was 8-0 to use the W. 6th/7th Aves. alignment, if I recall. Must have been a result of "intellectual bullying."

For folks who don't know. LTD got caught with its pants down on the facts -- _most specifically the superior service benefits of running on W. 6th and 7th Aves._

Hopefully, you no longer have any role in transit planning because you haven't got a clue.
 
-- Paul
Example Output: No

Example Input: I'm with you on the slimed-down budget. 

Seems to me that we've been getting slimed-down budgets for many years, though. 

A product of slimy legislators immersed in slimy caucuses, me thinks.
Example Output: No

Example Input: Chain-gangs are slave-labor, yet few object to someone suggesting chain-gangs.  The real objections to prisoner labor comes from the unions, who want to prevent anything which impacts the regular job market.
Example Output:
No