We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Ex Input:
Sent1: If we sentence someone to life in prison, we can always free them at a later time if they are found to be innocent.
 Sent2: As long as we sentence people to a life in prison we are also GUARANTEED to sentence an innocent person.

Ex Output:
Not similar


Ex Input:
Sent1: If someone is bad enough to be considered for the death penalty then they must have had sure evidence that they are guilty if they are then they shouldn't deserve the right to live among people they could kill
 Sent2: If a person commits murder, I don't believe they deserve to live.

Ex Output:
Similar


Ex Input:
Sent1: You are against of violence, but have you ever thought that death penalty is also violence?
 Sent2: It seems that you're assuming the correlation between crime rate and countries with capital punishment is that the death penalty encourages crime.

Ex Output:

Not similar