In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence can be inferred from the statement. Incorrect choices change the meaning in important ways or have details that are not mentioned in the statement. Indicate your answer as 1,2, or 3 corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.

[EX Q]: Statement: Depending on how much time you have, you may want to combine two or three of the regions in order to get a sense of the great diversity of French Paris and the wine country, the mountains, or the Atlantic or Mediterranean coasts. Choices:  1. The diversity of French Paris is one that can't be found anywhere else. 2. It's a good idea to combine several regions in order to get a sense of the diversity of France. 3. France is a one dimensional tourist attraction.
[EX A]: 2

[EX Q]: Statement: Anyone who knew Tony Lukas even slightly was deeply impressed by his boundless, open-minded curiosity about the injustices of modern life, along with his stubborn reportorial integrity about getting to the very bottom of any story as best he could. Choices:  1. Tony Lukas was an elitist.  2. People who knew Tony Lukas were impressed by his curiosity and integrity in the news field.  3. Tony Lukas was open minded, curious and stubborn. 
[EX A]: 2

[EX Q]: Statement: The Ochterlony Monument originally named after an obscure British warrior is one of many Caletta landmarks which has not exactly taken on its new name (Shahid Minar). Choices:  1. The people of Caletta embraced the new name for the Ochterlony Monument, and it's almost never called by its former name anymore. 2. The government tried to rename many of the landmarks in Caletta, but none of the new names caught on. 3. People in Caletta haven't adopted the new name for the Ochterlony Monument.
[EX A]:
3