We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

[Q]: Sent1: I do feel that those who murder in cold blood would be more than deserving of the death penalty.
 Sent2: I firmly believe that some crimes and criminals are deserving of death.
[A]: Similar


[Q]: Sent1: An argument regarding the death penalty should be confined to discussions regarding those who have been wrongly convicted and sentenced to death.
 Sent2: The debate question asks "Should the death penalty be legalized?"
[A]: Not similar


[Q]: Sent1: Because we are all potential victims of violent crime, and I believe that there are violent crimes deserving of the death penalty.
 Sent2: I think the death penalty is an archaic and obsolete form of punishment, even for the crime of murder.
[A]:
Similar