In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

Comment: The irony is that on that point we agree.  Until you start defending them because you like their foreign policy.  Guess you hate all those little brown Muslims worse than you hate Hill and Billary, and don't mind if the latter kills 'em by the millions for you...
Identity-attack

Comment: "Gay marriage" ... what a contradiction in terms ... but people think if they vote for it, it will be a reality... :))  It is a sad, very sad state of affairs, when people think that the truth about reality is a matter of majority vote. :)) You know ... like Supreme court decides, tat 2+2=5 :)), or Supreme Court decides that blacks are inferior ...  

 I find this sooo sad ... when people have to resort to the coercive force of the law (decided by majority vote) to twist reality into their image and likeness. What an extreme form of narcissism this is....     

In every other area of life people would lough their heads of at such silliness, but when it comes to sexuality ... people eyes get glassed over ... and they start to see and think things ... very strange things .
Identity-attack

Comment: This "investigation" seems a bit of a joke, did they do NO investigating as they paid out $13M.....they didn't do that "just because"...seems to me the investigating is done, and now they need to DO SOMETHING.  They have already made the decision that keeping him was worth at least $13M and that they would tolerate it...what's changed?

Non-identity-attack