Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.

[EX Q]: I think that's what the folks who write for ADN fail to notice. The liberal leaning journalists have convinced Alaskans that the villages can't survive without the urban folks keeping them afloat. They *can* survive just like they did before white men came -- yet they claim cultural superiority while at the same time taking state and federal dollars to run (and waste) in their communities. With all the fraud going on, perfect example of the North Slope Borough especially Barrow, Alaskans in urban communities are a bit mistrusting of what rural folks have been doing with that flow of cash in the last few decades. Accountability is a big problem and working, urban folks are tired of footing their bill. The state can't afford the budget that grew. They have to cut. Rural folks got too comfy with free clinics and internet in their libraries. Time to pay your own way people.
[EX A]: No

[EX Q]: this is pure balderdash drivel.  The same folks who drove stoned before legalization are the same folks driving stoned after legalization. They have not doubled in accidents as AAA is pulling numbers from their buttocks insulting intelligence.
[EX A]: Yes

[EX Q]: The first time I saw Portlandia I figured that the idea of Portlandia's days were numbered.
[EX A]:
No