In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.

Input: Consider Input: Comment: The 16% who still support her are the 'sunshine list' government employees

Output: Agree


Input: Consider Input: Comment: Which "victims" is Munoz referring to?  The victims in both of these rape cases are CHILDREN.  Munoz never in either of her letters once mentioned the children who were raped by their parents and foster parent.  Adding insult to injury, Munoz is only backing away because she's getting the message that law abiding Alaskans with morals are going to take her legislative seat away from her; as it should be.  Too little too late, Munoz.  How dare you back peddle for the wrong reason.  Alaskans should continue pressuring Munoz to resign from the Legislature.  Anything short of that is unacceptable.

Output: Agree


Input: Consider Input: Comment: You would be unable to cite sources for the"illegality" of the settlements, as there are none. The settlements are built on disputed lands no doubt, but lands that no "Palestinian" country or sovereign political entity has ever had title to. 

Israel has every right to construct settlements on "disputed" lands, until such time as title can be proved to be held by another sovereign entity. The court of public opinion, led by 180 countries that have routinely demonstrated an overwhelming anti-Israel bias, has no standing in this matter, except to those that share that bias.


Output: Disagree