In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Comment: While I agree with the basics of your thought (the Legislature failed us), to think the chief thief would not have vetoed the PFD is foolishness. That man wants our PFD, and nothing will stop him. The Legislature could have hacked the budget with a light saber, and Walker would have still capped our PFD.
Non-sexual-explicit

Comment: The Pope would do far better if he could just work a bit to wrap his mind around that ever-so-novel (and, yes, I am being VERY sarcastic here) concept that women are equal to men, and that women and men can be equally courageous and loving and good and bad and intelligent and capable, or ignorant and useless, or anything in between, as the case may be.  
And before anyone starts telling me about his age, etc, please be aware that the women's emancipation movement is MUCH older than the Pope, and the fact that, as a male, he chose to resist it, does not really give him much excuse.  Apparently, he has been wrong his entire life about this, and it's high time for him to take notice of that fact.
Non-sexual-explicit

Comment: Would you still love your child? Would think it's ok for people to revile him, call him a bastard, low life, hope he gets an anally raped, beaten and dies in prison, call you a bad parent and The rest of the garbage spewed on here by certain commenters?

Sexual-explicit