In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

Input: Consider Input: Sentence: Steve follows Fred's example in everything. He influences him hugely.
 Reason: The 'He' refers to fred because Steve follows Fred's example, thus Steve is primary. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

Output: Correct


Input: Consider Input: Sentence: Fred and Alice had very warm down coats, but they were not prepared for the cold in Alaska.
 Reason: The 'they' refers to fred and alice because the coats are what is not enough for the cold. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

Output: Correct


Input: Consider Input: Sentence: Adam can't leave work here until Bob arrives to replace him. If Bob had  left home for work on time, he would be here by this time.
 Reason: The 'he' refers to bob because Adam is the one waiting to go home/leave. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 


Output: Wrong