In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Ex Input:
Comment: Astonishing comments on this thread. The C series was a remarkable achievement for a mid sized country like Canada and showed the level of technological expertise in aerospace. Name me any other country in the world apart from the USA that has even come close to this achievement. Airbus is multi country and Embraer is revamping old technology. Why shouldn't Canada play an important role within Airbus?
There will be more jobs in Alabama if the US market opens up but the new company with all its strengths could sell twice as much in the rest of the world where 70% of the market is  bringing more jobs to Canada. If Trump is happy about this deal which considerably strengthens Boeing's only real competitor the he is the fool I always thought he was.

Ex Output:
Non-sexual-explicit


Ex Input:
Comment: My remarks must be quite effective or there wouldn't be so many people falling over each other to try to refute them.  If they were so crass and crazy to not matter a hill of beans or as Mr. Clark has claimed, counterproductive to my cause, the smart thing to do would be to let them go and self-destruct on their own.  Mr. Clark and Mr. Kelley simply cannot not answer no matter how far I go.  I must be hitting the mark somewhere.

Ex Output:
Non-sexual-explicit


Ex Input:
Comment: According to the murdered guy's girlfriend, the office instructed her boyfriend to take out his ID.  The  boyfriend informed the office that he had a gun in the vehicle and was LICENSED TO CARRY.  There's no steering wheel on the passenger's side of the car.  Why was the police officer drawing a gun on a passenger unless it was racial profiling.

Ex Output:

Non-sexual-explicit