Categorize the comment on the basis of severe toxicity. If the comment is severely toxic output Yes, otherwise output No.

Q: Politicians love to spend other people's money.  Why should Alaskans want to grow an already  bloated parasite; State Government?  The money should go to the Citizens not to the parasites in Juneau.  If the money is stolen from the People then every single politician who did not act to stop the government theft should be recalled.  The public should act swiftly and should not simply babble complaints and wait until the next election.  You train dogs by swiftly rewarding and swiftly correcting bad behavior.  You have to treat the parasitic politicians the same way.  NO EXCUSES!

A: No
****
Q: In the middle east they kill homosexuals....

A: Yes
****
Q: If the point of your argument is that imminent extinction of irreplaceable native wild species, and/or the risk of zoonotic pandemics, isn't sufficient grounds to do whatever is possible to eliminate the cause, or if you believe eradicating your own species is preferable to eliminating cats, I must conclude that your arguments simply aren't worth taking seriously.  But admittedly that was fairly obvious from your first post.

A:
No
****