In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: threat and non-threat. Threat is a statement that someone will be hurt or harmed, especially if the person does not do something in particular.

[Q]: Comment: better a muslim than an eskimo?
[A]: Non-threat


[Q]: Comment: Hang him as a teen
[A]: Threat


[Q]: Comment: Not a bad call, because the Devil is in the details (as usual). There are consequences to hasty decisions, and no battle plan survives contact with the enemy. I side with Trump, because one thing that is necessary to an effective military is the psychological stability of the people wearing the uniform. In my case, I required close scrutiny because I was to be one who launched nuclear weapons. Remember Chelsea Manning? Crypto troop, special clearances and a psychological basket case. He released vast amounts of classified material because of his homosexual/tranny leanings. If he made the Army "stronger", then I'm a cracked teapot with a giraffe for my mom. Who wants to give a Secret clearance to somebody who can't even decide what gender he is? Might as well enlist depressed and./or bipolars and give them access to sensitive material. And the Navy needs lookouts, so why not recruit the blind for those positions? What could go wrong?
[A]:
Non-threat