The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the self-need strategy, otherwise output No. self-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to create a personal need for an item in the negotiation, such as by pointing out that the participant sweats a lot to show preference towards water packages.

Q: Context: 'i need two food items and one water' 'I will take 2 waters, however I would like 2 food and you can have 1 food and 3 firewoods' 'one food is not enough i am pregnant and i need to eat many meals'
Utterance: 'My friend is ill and needs to eat to survive. How about I take 3 water then and you can have 2 food and all of the wood?'

A: Yes
****
Q: Context: 'That's fair, but I have wiggle room on the water, how about I take two food, two firewood and you take 3 water, 1 food, 1 firewood?' 'Is there anyway you will go with that I get two firewood? I need food the most but since you get most of that can I get most of the firewood? So 1 food, 2 firewood, and 2 water for me?' 'You drive a hard bargain. I could really use that firewood. It's going to get cold tonight and these sleeping bags are not worth the price I paid ;)'
Utterance: 'Haha, I know but I am in the same situation! ☹️ and since I am getting less food I feel like it is fair I get on more firewood since I truly need that 🙂'

A: No
****
Q: Context: 'Hey how are you doing I really need extra firewood as i want to build a shelter and keep warm' 'Hi there, I am doing well, I can get you an extra firewood as long as I can get extra Water and Food to thrive during camping'
Utterance: 'I would be ok with that but i will need some water and food as Im a little out of shape'

A:
Yes
****