In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence can be inferred from the statement. Incorrect choices change the meaning in important ways or have details that are not mentioned in the statement. Indicate your answer as 1,2, or 3 corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.

[EX Q]: Statement: yeah i think that's great because i mean you know you you it's less guilt you feel knowing that you have to leave them everyday if you can go in and see them for ten or fifteen minutes around a lunch hour or Choices:  1. They are very happy to see me at lunchtime. 2. I feel very guilty about not seeing them all day long. 3. It's much better this way because you can see them at lunch and not feel bad about missing them.
[EX A]: 3

[EX Q]: Statement: The sea has always played an important role in the history of this corner of France, from Scandinavians arriving in longships to Celts fleeing from Anglo-Saxons and Normans sailing to conquer England. Choices:  1. Scandinavians arrived in France via the ocean. 2. The Scandinavians stayed in France for a long time. 3. In this part of France, the influence of the sea is negligible.
[EX A]: 1

[EX Q]: Statement: Without the time to meander and explore those hidden corners, you risk not seeing much more than Piazza San Marco, and understanding very little of the city's inherent charm. Choices:  1. You can fully comprehend the charmingness of the city even if you don't have a lot of time to meander.  2. There is a chance that you won't be able to comprehend the innate charm of the city if you don't have enough time to wander around and see its lesser-known corners. 3. It takes at least a week of exploring the city to fully understand its innate charm.
[EX A]:
2