In this task, you will be shown a sentence, and you should determine whether it is overruling or non-overruling. In law, an overruling sentence is a statement that nullifies a previous case decision as a precedent by a constitutionally valid statute or a decision by the same or higher ranking court which establishes a different rule on the point of law involved. Classify your answers into overruling or non-overruling

Input: Consider Input: in so far as texas n. o. r. co. v. pool, tex.civ.app., 263 s.w.2d 582, no writ history, may be in conflict with what is here said, it is disapproved.

Output: overruling


Input: Consider Input: ""a defendant is entitled to  a jury trial . . . only if he can demonstrate"" that those penalties - which consist of ""the maximum authorized period of incarceration"" together with ""any additional statutory penalties"" - ""are so severe that they clearly reflect a legislative determination that the offense in question is a 'serious' one.""

Output: non-overruling


Input: Consider Input: to the extent that walsh v. local board 10, 305 f.supp. 1274 (s.d. n.y. 1969), construed "academic year" to mean the 12 month period following the beginning of the registrant's course of study, we disapprove that construction.


Output: overruling