Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.

Q: The Juneau Access Road (JAR) should be re-named the Kensington Access Project (KAP)---Every time I see arguments for and against this project, and the overly optimistic cost-benefit analysis, given  terrain and conditions north of Berner's Bay, I always get the distinct feeling that developers will "see the light" right about the time the road gets to the Kensington Mine.

A: Yes
****
Q: The Republican party establishing demonstrating why Trump is so popular.  We are at war with Radical Islam. Wishing it away isn't going to make the mean people stop.  Until we take a much tougher stance thing will get worse before they get better.  Restricting immigration from Islamic countries that harbor radicals is common sense.

Allowing unfettered immigration from countries that hate us is a stupid idea. One that has and will come to harm us.

A: Yes
****
Q: I realize that I've been critical of Obama in the past, but when I step back and look at what he's accomplished I have to admit I'm impressed.  Obamacare is a huge advance over what we had (nothing).  Serious action to address climate change.  Appointed highly qualified supreme court justices that aren't hyper political and conservative.

He was far from perfect.  Too much militarism, too cozy with big business and all that.  But given the congress he had to deal with he made more progress can I expected.  And just think if he had lost either election.

The republicans deserve Trump.  And they deserve the drubbing they're going to get.  Bernie or Hillary will crush him.

A:
Yes
****