Given a document, an entity and its sentiment towards the entity, verify if it is the correct sentiment towards the entity. Answer should be yes or no. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

Input: Consider Input: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Lankford is Negative . "We watched even this weekend  the Russians and their troll farms  and their internet folks  start hash-tagging out 'take a knee' and also hash-tagging out 'Boycott NFL '" said Lankford  whoâs a member of the Intelligence Committee. Theyâre trying âto raise the noise level in America to try to make a big issue  an even bigger issue as theyâre trying to just push divisiveness in the country. Weâve continued to be able to see that. Weâll see it again in our election time.â
FBI Director Christopher Wray  who testified about his agencyâs work  did not directly address  Lankfordâs  claim  but said the FBI is working to track Russian efforts to influence U.S. elections.
 Lankfordâs  spokesman said the senator has been receiving information about Russian trolls sowing discord in the U.S. for more than a year.
"Senator Lankford made an individual decision to start talking about this publicly  because he believes the American people should know '' said  the spokesman .
As an example   the spokesman  pointed to a Russian Twitter user called Boston Antifa but the geolocation of the account is in Vladivostok  Russia.

Output: no


Input: Consider Input: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Donna Brazile is Negative . Donna Brazile . (Joe Raedle/Associated Press)
On Thursday  former Democratic National Committee interim chair  Donna Brazile  made a surprising revelation: An August 2015 agreement gave Hillary Clintonâs campaign partial control of the DNC months prior to Clinton winning the nomination. The âagreement was not illegal â  Brazile  writes  âbut it sure looked unethical.â The news reignited a debate among politicos and activists over whether the DNC influenced the Democratic primary. Whether the primary was âriggedâ or just business as usual though  Brazileâs allegations are only the latest evidence of the Democratic Partyâs troubles  and why the party establishment is ill-equipped to solve them.
Start with something that  Brazile âs article doesnât touch on: the electoral record. At the federal level  Republicans control the White House and both houses of Congress. The GOP House majority is at its largest in 70 years. Though two-thirds of the Senate seats contested in 2016 were held by Republicans  Democrats only gained two seats  losing races against very vulnerable GOP incumbents. At the state level  Republicans are at their strongest since the 1930s. Republicans control both the state legislatures and governorships in 24 states  compared with Democratsâ five. The GOPâs ruthless exploitation of gerrymandering â aided by its control of so many states â has helped increase GOP control  but much blame still lies with Democratic leaders.
Here is what you need to know about the political storm sparked by  Donna Brazile 's allegations against the Clinton campaign. (Amber Ferguson Melissa Macaya/The Washington Post)
Then thereâs the financial mismanagement. Money troubles for the DNC are hardly unprecedented  but the struggles appear to have worsened considerably in the past few years.  Brazile  says that the partyâs monthly expenditures had doubled in the previous five years  in large part because of former DNC chair Debbie Wasserman-Schultz and President Barack Obama keeping expensive consultants on the payroll. (Given Democratsâ electoral failures  what these consultants were doing is anyoneâs guess.) Of course  itâs in  Brazile âs interest to blame things on  her  predecessor. But a former senior party official independently confirmed the troubles to the Interceptâs Ryan Grim  adding that the DNC was unable to make payroll in August 2015 and was âapproaching the equivalent of bankruptcy.â

Output: no


Input: Consider Input: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Rhonda Richards is Neutral . âThis elevates this issue as a priority â said  Rhonda Richards  senior legislative representative of AARP . As the initial driving force behind the legislation  AARP rallied more than 60 aging and disability organizations to support the idea  including the Elizabeth Dole Foundation  Paralyzed Veterans of America  Michael J. Fox Foundation and the Alzheimerâs Association and then championed the appeal to legislators. The senior advocate organization has nearly 38 million members and offices in every state  the District of Columbia  Puerto Rico  and the U.S. Virgin Islands
 Richards  said whether you have been a caregiver  will be a caregiver  or may need a caregiver at some point  âThis issue has touched just about everyone. Itâs non-partisan. Itâs bi-partisan. Most people have a personal story. The law helps bring together stakeholders to better recognize and support families and caregivers to help make sure caregivers get the training and support they need to navigate the healthcare system.â
While RAISE does not authorize additional funding for the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services (HHS)  it does mandate the development of a strategy within a 3-year period.  Richards  said RAISE calls for the creation of an advisory council that will be required to issue a report to HHS Secretary Eric D. Hargan within a year of the lawâs enactment. Hargan will then be required to issue a national strategy within 18 months of the lawâs enactment. Going forward  the advisory council will be required to provide the secretary annual progress reports.
Some of the topics that will likely be addressed to support caregivers  according to  Richards   include:
âThe idea is to come up with best practices for health care providers and others  for employers to better support family caregivers and for government to better support family caregivers â  Richards  said. âThe reports and strategy provide important information and steps that can be acted upon.â


Output: yes