In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Input: Consider Input: Comment: Yes, whatever precedent or wording or function that can be found, to remove Meredith from the Senate - a man few Canadians consider worthy of dignity or respect. Men like him, with financial power and connections, who groom teen aged girls for sex, are a dime a dozen in Canada. The Senate risks wide perception of total uselessness if Meredith remains.

Output: Non-sexual-explicit


Input: Consider Input: Comment: I'm honestly unrepentant on this: Sex, attempted sex, sexual assault against your child and you die. No mercy, nothing less. Death. Male or Female abusers put to death. That is it.

We seriously need the death penalty back. Without it, we've become idiots.

Output: Sexual-explicit


Input: Consider Input: Comment: The only "abuse" of government power here is the slap-on-the-wrist administered to the perp, presumably because of his right-wing politics and his pink skin. If you are poor or black and you use a gun in the commission of a crime on federal lands, while pointing that gun at law enforcement, I can guarantee you that you will not have those charges plea-bargained away. 

Only in America could these serial criminals get a veritable slap-on-the-wrist and their defenders still cavail over the supposed "injustice" and "abuse." No doubt at all that these same individuals' voices are among the loudest of those screaming for the full application of the rigor of the Law when the perp does not have the magic white skin and right-wing politics to merit a Get Out of Jail Free card.


Output: Non-sexual-explicit