We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

Example Input: Their only success has been violating the Constitution and killing women and children or just burning them to death and shooting nursing mothers.
Example Output: Valid

Example Input: Ironically, both Lott and Handgun Control acknowledge that the reams of gun control laws on the books in Washington and in all 50 states have been ineffective in eradicating mass shootings or preventing children from bringing weapons to school.
Example Output: Valid

Example Input: But is the answer to take down the gun free zones...and just allow kids to carry guns to school?
Example Output:
Valid