Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.

[EX Q]: It was not murder.  LaVoy fled, endangered others, and charged the FBI.  The FBI was forced to open fire then.  It was suicide by cop.  La Voy pledged to kill himself before  allowing himself to be arrested.  He did.

The Bundys and their cohorts are criminals.  They stole and damaged property.  They are tax dodgers.  They turned guns on Federal officers and threatened them.

The government bent over back wards to settle this peacefully.  they undercharged them for their crimes.  If a gang had robbed a bank and someone dies in the commission of their crimes, the whole gang is charged with murder-even if the gang weren't the ones to shoot.  That's the law.

I suggest you read the Constitution yourself, and Supreme Court decisions and American History to learn the real meaning of the law and not your distorted uneducated version of it.
[EX A]: Yes

[EX Q]: For once the court shows some common sense in an aircraft crash. Usually the big pockets, In this case Cessna and Continental are made to pay out money for the negligence of the operator.

Preston Cavner should have been charged with manslaughter for the death of his son and attempted manslaughter for the others injured in the crash. The fact he was never charged with this crime itself is an indictment of the criminal system.

There is no excuse for intentionally overloading an aircraft which is exactly what he did and got a four year old, his own son killed because of it. The burns from the crash the other victims suffered justify the attempted murder charge.
[EX A]: Yes

[EX Q]: You jerks down in JNU are pitiful. Walker, you might've pulled your head out but you haven't grubbed out your ears.
[EX A]:
Yes