We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

Example Input: By the way, you forgot army tanks, and military jet fighters, grenade launchers, military attack helos, and land owners who keep aircraft carriers in their stock tanks, or how about people using their chimneys for missle silos.
Example Output: Valid

Example Input: Therefore nobody should have access to firearms trace data for civil actions, as they pose absolutely no relevance of any sort to fighting crime, and are designed only for bankrupting firearms companies.
Example Output: Valid

Example Input: Sticks and stones, lions and spears, swords, telephone cords, screwdrivers, cannons, canyons, burning them alive, cement shoes, pillows, pens, guns... The methods may change, but the fact remains - some people will kill, (or harm) other people.
Example Output:
Valid