Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.

[Q]: Heeere's Ernie! Geez man, this is the second place I've heard you complain that your racist posts were canned. Here's an idea for a graduate of  the 'Harvard of high schools', start your own blog where you can jerk-off all day to an admiring bog - all one of them.
[A]: Yes


[Q]: Well said Paul, you made your point clear.  With all the complaining about "government regulations" we forget that most rules are designed to protect property   owners and  users from unwanted intrusions.   Just as theaters have every right  to tell Mister Kahle to turn off  his cell phone and stop chatting.
[A]: No


[Q]: Our legislators have burned most of their bridges behind them, so they have no choice but to run the course.  There is a story in the Bible about a crooked business manager ... when his boss caught on, and was getting ready to fire him, he wrote off many of his bosses creditors, and secured sort of a "golden parachute" for himself.  Our legislators seem to be doing just that, redistributing a big hunk of Alaska's wealth to those who will give them jobs when they get fired from government.
[A]:
Yes