In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

Ex Input:
Sentence: Joe's uncle can still beat him at tennis, even though he is 30 years younger.
 Reason: The 'he' refers to joe because JOE REFER MORE LIKELY JOE'S UNCLE. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

Ex Output:
Wrong


Ex Input:
Sentence: There is a gap in the wall. You can see the garden behind it .
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the wall because The gap is the main subject, not the wall. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

Ex Output:
Correct


Ex Input:
Sentence: I took the water bottle out of the backpack so that it would be handy.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the water bottle because I took the water bottle out of the backpack so that The water bottle. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

Ex Output:

Wrong