We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Q: Sent1: I believe that people who have killed, raped, tortured, or have done any other extreme act of violence should get the death penalty.
 Sent2: However, as I know many disagree, I think there should be understandings for justifiable murders.

A: Not similar
****
Q: Sent1: Deterrence is not the only reason I support the death penalty.
 Sent2: Arguments that support the death penalty are the only ones that can reference the Constitution.

A: Not similar
****
Q: Sent1: There is no crime which justifies others to kill as a form of punishment, and it is ineffective as a deterrent to prevent crime.
 Sent2: IE - the death penalty acts as a deterrent to other would be murderers.

A:
Similar
****