TASK DEFINITION: In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.
PROBLEM: Sentence: Frank was upset with Tom because the toaster he had bought from him didn't work.
 Reason: The 'he' refers to frank because toaster likely to upset. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

SOLUTION: Wrong

PROBLEM: Sentence: Bob paid for Charlie's college education. He is very generous.
 Reason: The 'He' refers to bob because this isn't a character who has an easy time of it, and he's a very smart man. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

SOLUTION: Wrong

PROBLEM: Sentence: If the con artist has succeeded in fooling Sam, he would have gotten a lot of money.
 Reason: The 'he' refers to the con artist because he did wrong thing and got lost. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

SOLUTION:
Wrong