In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

Ex Input:
Sentence: The woman held the girl against her will.
 Reason: The 'her' refers to the girl because "held" is the action the woman is taking, she can't hold herself against her own chest. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

Ex Output:
Wrong


Ex Input:
Sentence: Dan took the rear seat while Bill claimed the front because his "Dibs!" was slow.
 Reason: The 'his' refers to dan because the front would go to the person who called dibs. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

Ex Output:
Correct


Ex Input:
Sentence: Sam took French classes from Adam, because he was eager to speak it fluently.
 Reason: The 'he' refers to sam because of the fact that the name 'John' is also a common one for a boy. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

Ex Output:

Wrong