instruction:
In this task, you will be shown a sentence, and you should determine whether it is overruling or non-overruling. In law, an overruling sentence is a statement that nullifies a previous case decision as a precedent by a constitutionally valid statute or a decision by the same or higher ranking court which establishes a different rule on the point of law involved. Classify your answers into overruling or non-overruling
question:
the alternative holding in heaps v. toy, supra, finding the contract in that case contrary to good morals, is inconsistent with the numerous california decisions upholding contracts between nonmarital partners when such contracts are not founded upon an illicit consideration, and is therefore disapproved.
answer:
overruling


question:
see, e.g., r.j. griffin & co. v. beach club ii homeowners ass'n, 384 f.3d 157, 160-61 (4th cir. 2004) (""in the context of arbitration, the doctrine [of equitable estoppel] applies when one party attempts 'to hold [another party] to the terms of [an] agreement' while simultaneously trying to avoid the agreement's arbitration clause.""
answer:
non-overruling


question:
the royal & sun opinion articulated those factors as follows:
answer:

non-overruling