We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

[EX Q]: Sent1: The death penalty has not been shown to be more effective than life imprisonment in deterring murder, hence we should choose life imprisonment.
 Sent2: The death penalty has never been shown to be a deterent to murder.
[EX A]: Similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: But I oppose the death penalty because it has the capacity to kill innocent people.
 Sent2: therefore the death penalty should not be used, simply because it kills innocent people.
[EX A]: Similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: If you accept vengeance as a reason for punishment then I understand why you would support the death penalty.
 Sent2: You can't just assume the death penalty is a crime.
[EX A]:
Not similar