Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
--------
Question: If they were acquiring the A320s they could turn around and sell them, if they don't want to operate a mixed fleet. At least they'd get some of their $2.6 billion back. So it certainly makes sense to factor in the planes.

If they go to an all Boeing fleet, all the Virgin employees are going to have to be trained on the 737, from pilot training to ground logistics.  It's going to be expensive, no matter which way they go.

Answer: No


Question: Now roll back half the oil producer credits.  Only fair they share in the pain.  Not buying the TajMahawker either, slice some serious resources from the legi's budget.  After all, they must be too flush, they have time to come up with stupid proposals regarding University carry and making sure kids haven't a clue on anything about sex.  Add a seasonal income and sales tax!

Answer: Yes


Question: There for awhile, I thought all the clowns in Oregon worked for PERS, CoverOregon, EWEB and LTD.  Now I see that some work for UO too.

Answer:
No