In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine the neutral choice based on your inference from the statement and your commonsense knowledge. The neutral choice is a sentence that neither agrees nor disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3', corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence. If sentence X agrees with sentence Y, one's correctness follows from the other one. If sentence X disagrees with sentence Y, they can not be correct at the same time.

Statement: Any option to expand Medicare's benefit package-absent other reforms-runs the risk of exacerbating the program's fiscal imbalance and increasing government dissaving. Choices: 1. Medicare benefits can be expanded indefinitely without consequence. 2. Expanded Medicare benefits include better coverage for medication. 3. Expanding Medicare benefits could create government deficits.
2

Statement: The bad  Lots of people might be killed in the process. Choices: 1. The worst thing is that we might be the ones to die, too. 2. Lots of people might be killed in the process - that's the bad thing. 3. There is nothing bad about this, it has only good sides.
1

Statement: are you covered yes are you covered really no Choices: 1. You are covered extremely well. 2. You are not properly covered. 3. You are not covered sufficiently.

3