We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

Ex Input:
Those who claim that Australia suffered a "crime wave" as a result of new gun laws often cite as evidence unrelated figures for common assault or sexual assault (no weapon) and armed robbery (any weapon).

Ex Output:
Valid


Ex Input:
This decision, Cases v US, is where the militia connection qualification (fn2) was born and another, US v Tot is where the "state's right" interpretations (fn3) came into being

Ex Output:
Valid


Ex Input:
Gun ownership is a protected right, and the fact that criminals use guns in the commission of crime will never change this fact.

Ex Output:

Valid