TASK DEFINITION: In this task, you will be presented with a context from an academic paper and a question separated with a 
. You have to answer the question based on the context.
PROBLEM: Embedding: We developed different variations of our models with a simple lookup table embeddings learned from scratch and using high-performance contextual embeddings, which are ELMo BIBREF11, BERT BIBREF16 and ClinicalBERT BIBREF13 (trained and provided by the authors). 
 Question: What embeddings are used?

SOLUTION:  simple lookup table embeddings learned from scratch using high-performance contextual embeddings, which are ELMo BIBREF11, BERT BIBREF16 and ClinicalBERT BIBREF13

PROBLEM: Parallel Scan Inference
The commutative properties of semiring algorithms allow flexibility in the order in which we compute $A(\ell )$. Typical implementations of dynamic programming algorithms are serial in the length of the sequence. Vectorized Parsing
Computational complexity is even more of an issue for parsing algorithms, which cannot be as easily parallelized. Semiring Matrix Operations
The two previous optimizations reduce most of the cost to semiring matrix multiplication. In the specific case of the $(\sum , \times )$ semiring these can be computed very efficiently using matrix multiplication, which is highly-tuned on GPU hardware. Unfortunately for other semirings, such as log and max, these operations are either slow or very memory inefficient. For instance, for matrices $T$ and $U$ of sized $N \times M$ and $M \times O$, we can broadcast with $\otimes $ to a tensor of size $N \times M \times O$ and then reduce dim $M$ by $\bigoplus $ at a huge memory cost. 
 Question: What baselines are used in experiments?

SOLUTION: Typical implementations of dynamic programming algorithms are serial in the length of the sequence Computational complexity is even more of an issue for parsing algorithms, which cannot be as easily parallelized Unfortunately for other semirings, such as log and max, these operations are either slow or very memory inefficient

PROBLEM: In terms of speed, our system was able to lemmatize 7.4 million words on a personal laptop in almost 2 minutes compared to 2.5 hours for MADAMIRA, i.e. 75 times faster.  
 Question: How was speed measured?

SOLUTION:
how long it takes the system to lemmatize a set number of words