In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

Q: Sentence: Mark told Pete many lies about himself, which Pete included in his book. He should have been more  truthful.
 Reason: The 'He' refers to mark because The lies were included in the book Pete wrote; therefore Paul was the one untruthful. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

A: Correct
****
Q: Sentence: Since it was raining, I carried the newspaper over my backpack to keep it dry.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the backpack because things inside backpack are dry. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

A: Wrong
****
Q: Sentence: We went to the lake, because a shark had been seen at the ocean beach, so it was a dangerous place to swim.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the ocean beach because dangerous place to swim due to shark problem. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

A:
Correct
****