Given a document, an entity and its sentiment towards the entity, verify if it is the correct sentiment towards the entity. Answer should be yes or no. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

Ex Input:
Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Cristiano Ronaldo is Positive . DORTMUND  Germany (Reuters) - Cristiano Ronaldo scored twice in his 150th European appearance to give Real Madrid a 3-1 victory at Borussia Dortmund  their first against them in Germany  and make it two wins out of two matches in their Champions League Group H.
Soccer Football - Champions League - Borussia Dortmund vs Real Madrid - Westfalenstadion  Dortmund  Germany - September 26  2017 Real Madrid’s Cristiano Ronaldo celebrates scoring their second goal with Gareth Bale REUTERS/Leon Kuegeler
Daniel Carvajal responded with a fine solo effort and  Ronaldo  also came close a little later but the Spaniards were lucky not to concede a penalty when Ramos cleared a Maximilian Philipp effort on the line with his hand.
Soccer Football - Champions League - Borussia Dortmund vs Real Madrid - Westfalenstadion  Dortmund  Germany - September 26  2017 Real Madrid’s  Cristiano Ronaldo  celebrates scoring their third goal with Sergio Ramos and Luka Modric REUTERS/Leon Kuegeler
“We had our chances but Real did it really well ” said Dortmund’s Gonzalo Castro. “With players like Bale and  Ronaldo  they really know how to take advantage of the gaps. It is too dangerous against such teams to stand too high up the pitch.”
It was Real who scored again when Bale was given far too much space to cut in and find  Ronaldo  in the heart of the box in the 50th.
The Germans quickly pulled a goal back with Aubameyang stabbing in a Castro cross to keep the game tight  until  Ronaldo  broke clear and fired in their third goal and their 14th in the last seven Champions League matches.

Ex Output:
yes


Ex Input:
Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Hillary Clinton is Negative . Speaking to the media reports of a possible Special Counsel in the offing over  her  Uranium One deal to the leftist media outlet Mother Jones  the former first lady  former Secretary of State and former Democratic nominee for president said :
 Hillary Clinton  would have you believe prosecuting corruption and holding anyone accountable is something only tinpot dictatorships do.
âIf they send a signal that weâre going to be like some dictatorship  like some authoritarian regime  where political opponents are going to be unfairly  fraudulently investigated  that rips at the fabric of the contract we have  that we can trust our justice system â  Clinton  said. âIt will be incredibly demoralizing to people who have served at the Justice Department  under both Republicans and Democrats  because they know better. But it will also send a terrible signal to our country and the world that somehow we are giving up on the kind of values that we used to live by and we used to promote worldwide.â
 Hillary Clinton  has been getting away with corruption for so long  she  doesn't see  herself  as subject to the law at all. There was  her  illegal private server   her  destruction of government emails and tech machinery 'with hammers ' amounting to obstruction of justice  there was  her  collusion with Fusion GPS which took phony "opposition research" from the Russians for use in an investigation and leakfest against Donald Trump and this doesn't even cover the half of it. During  her  tenure as Secretary of State  there were classified documents mishandled (left on the dashboard of cars on overseas trips)  the Benghazi failure to protect American personnel overseas  the Benghazi talking points coverup  a missing $2 billion in financial mismanagement and more. Scroll further back and the corruption continues in the same pattern: Whitewater  the cattle futures cleanup  the missing billing records and "I don't recall." lt likely goes even further back than that with the NGOs and the Nixon investigation. Any wonder the late William Safire called her 'a congenital liar' and the number one reason voters rejected her according to a Soros group  was the public perception of her as untrustworthy?
I've got news for her: Banana republics  tinpot dictatorships  and authoritarian regimes do not prosecute big-dollar corruption among the politically connected. Going by pay-to-play rules is how they operate. That's how Mugabe in Africa and Chavistas in Venezuela and assorted characters in the Indonesia of the  Clinton  era operate. It's what makes them banana republics in the first place.
Far from the act of prosecuting corruption being a problem  as  Hillary Clinton  would have you believe  operating on pay-to-play principles and expecting to get away with it is what makes a place a tinpot regime.

Ex Output:
yes


Ex Input:
Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Elaine Luria is Negative . The reason I raise this now is because weâve got a candidate seeking the Democratic nomination (and just named to the DCCCâs âRed-to-Blueâ list) in VA-02  Elaine Luria  who voted for Republican Scott Taylor both in the 2016 GOP primary AND in the 2016 general election against the Democratic nominee in VA-02. According to Patrick Wilsonâs report in the RTD (bolding added by me for emphasis):
â Elaine  doesnât make decisions just based on political party â  her  campaign manager said by email. âFaced with the options on the ballot   she  took a chance on fellow veteran Scott Taylor who promised to bring change and be something different  but he broke those promises.â
âLike many Democrats in our district   Elaine  voted against Randy Forbes in that primary because he had shown during his legislative career to be an extreme voice in Congress  particularly when it came to womenâs reproductive freedom  LGBT equality  and preventing gun violence â Luria campaign manager Kathryn Sorenson said by email.
âNow  after seeing the way that Scott Taylor has acted in Washington and the votes he has taken to create chaos in our health care system   Elaine  has decided to run against him.â
Back in January  I had actually asked  Luria  about  her  vote in the GOP primary  and  she  responded: âThat year  there was no Democratic primary for Congress and I wanted to have my voice heard on who was on the ballot.â I responded to  her  that âI would have voted for Mickey Mouse or something in that one.â I havenât heard a word from  her  since. LOL
At this point  I havenât chosen a candidate in VA-02  but itâs been between  Luria  and Karen Mallard  the only two serious contenders for the Democratic nomination  as far as Iâm concerned. But Iâve got to say  the news about  Luria  voting for Taylor really bugs me  for at least three reasons.
First off  I think that Taylor is going to have a field day with this. Already  Taylorâs spokesperson is responding gleefully to the RTD  âScott Taylor is the same guy he was in 2016 and has done everything he said he would on the campaign. The only reason  Luria  is running is because she was promised money by Nancy Pelosi to be another rubber stamp in D.C. The people of the 2nd district will see right through it.â Expect to hear a LOT of that type of language in coming months  and certainly if  Elaine Luria  becomes the Democratic nominee in VA-02. So yeah  I truly do not see how this will help  Luria  win the general election. To the contrary  I think it will hurt  her  that  she  voted not once but twice for the same guy  she  voted for less than two years ago.
So thatâs my âJim Webb testâ for Democratic candidates who used to vote Republican: can you explain  articulately and convincingly  why you used to vote Republican (or even serve in a Republican administration) but are now a Democrat? Regarding  Elaine Luria    she  very well might have such a case to make  but so far I havenât heard it. To the contrary  Iâve mostly heard about how  she  doesnât vote based on party (whatever that means  given the stark differences between Democrats and the Party of Sarah Palin  Ken Cuccinelli  Corey Stewart  E.W. Jackson  Donald Trump  etc.  etc.)  how  Taylor  supposedly wasnât what  she  expected  him  to be  etc.
On that latter point  my friend Josh Stanfield of Activate Virginia posted on  his  groupâs Facebook page this morning something that rings true to me: â Scott Taylor  was a member of the House of Delegates and had a partisan voting record in that body. When  he  ran for Congress in 2016  anyone interested in  his  politics or voting behavior wouldâve been just a few clicks away from discovering  his  opposition to pretty much every Democratic priority.â

Ex Output:

no