instruction:
The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the no-need strategy, otherwise output No. no-need is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used when a participant points out that they do not need an item based on personal context such as suggesting that they have ample water to spare. no-need can directly benefit the opponent since it implies that the item is up for grabs.
question:
Context: 'Yeah, it's very sad these days' 'Then I got here and noticed I didn't pack my cooking sterno and critters go into some of my food☹️Kinda puts a damper on the trip.' 'Oh, i see. How about you get 2 food 1 firewood and 1 water. I need the extra firewood to stay warm at night'
Utterance: 'Yeah, that should work. I brought plenty of water and the critters left that alone. You planning to go out on the trails at all?'
answer:
Yes


question:
Context: 'Same. Plus I am planning on keeping a fire long into the night. Eating alot of food also helps keep you warm while sleeping. Perhaps I could offer you some extra food in return for some extra firewood?' 'Hmm I will have to think about this offer. How do you feel about the water packages?' 'I am a water junkie day to day but the place I am camping as a stream and I'm taking my water filter system, so I could offer you extra water in this case.'
Utterance: 'That is very considerate of you. 🙂'
answer:
No


question:
Context: 'Hi. I'm most interested in water. What's your highest priority?' 'I really need water too. I have a young baby and will do a lot of washing.' 'Okay. I'm not especially worried about food. What's your lowest priority?'
Utterance: 'I have enough food too. Can I take 2 water, 1 firewood and 2 food?'
answer:

Yes