In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

[EX Q]: Sentence: I couldn't find a spoon, so I tried using a pen to stir my  coffee. But that turned out to be a bad idea, because it got full of ink.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the coffee because i Couldn't find a spoon, so I tried using a pen to stir my coffee. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
[EX A]: Correct

[EX Q]: Sentence: I stuck a pin through a carrot. When I pulled the pin out, it left a hole.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the pin because it was pulled out with a pin instead of a carrot. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
[EX A]: Wrong

[EX Q]: Sentence: Jackson was greatly influenced by Arnold, though he lived two centuries later.
 Reason: The 'he' refers to jackson because "Was" is past tense. He was influenced by Arnold. So you assume Arnold is dead. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
[EX A]:
Correct