In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

[Q]: Comment: The only Trump supporter in Canada's tactics :

1/Use multiple anonymous names.

2/Post lies over and over again in ECHO chamber style.

3/Villify minorities and the poor.

4/When confronted with the inconvenient truth that Americans are far more likely to die as a result of their own gun or the gun of another American than a terrorist attack, go back to point #1

You always were a bother and a bore, Sweeney.

Do get lost
[A]: Non-sexual-explicit


[Q]: Comment: You don't seem to be a person I care to spend much time on. 

You do know, don't you, that young Hillary was a staff attorney for the House Judiciary Committee? 

Mostly undistinguished, but some claim she was unethical even then.

It's nice you can laugh at your own ignorance. Enjoy.
[A]: Non-sexual-explicit


[Q]: Comment: This will be interesting to follow and see how it concludes re: continuing to be licensed to teach in Oregon or not. There is a relatively new movement to have real time communication between school district's across the nation and having access to their work history. It has been that a "fired, released, bad, incompetent" teacher would simply apply to another State and be hired. This young lady does not have the maturity, discipline nor common sense to guide the young lives of children!
[A]:
Non-sexual-explicit