In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Q: Comment: 1LittleBear asks "Did the bishops ever state to their priests that if they performed sex with a child/youth or another adult---that they could not celebrate Mass---that they were committing a sacrilege if they consumed the Host?"

Yes.  Can. 916.

A: Sexual-explicit
****
Q: Comment: Astonishing comments on this thread. The C series was a remarkable achievement for a mid sized country like Canada and showed the level of technological expertise in aerospace. Name me any other country in the world apart from the USA that has even come close to this achievement. Airbus is multi country and Embraer is revamping old technology. Why shouldn't Canada play an important role within Airbus?
There will be more jobs in Alabama if the US market opens up but the new company with all its strengths could sell twice as much in the rest of the world where 70% of the market is  bringing more jobs to Canada. If Trump is happy about this deal which considerably strengthens Boeing's only real competitor the he is the fool I always thought he was.

A: Non-sexual-explicit
****
Q: Comment: Nope, the villain is dead.  The lawyer just another liberal pos, who callously added to the victim's pain.

A:
Non-sexual-explicit
****