In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Ex Input:
Comment: another Thurstonian:  Listen Bub,  we're not talking about "chasing one unicorn"  we're talking about chasing THREE MILLION unicorns.....and they're "out there"...they're in plain sight.  you damn liberals like Paul Ryan just can't see them because you don't WANT TO see them.  I can see them and they're HUGE!!! not only that, but those illegals rode them to the polling places on November 8th.......you didn't see that either did you!!!! what's wrong with you People!!  How can you help "MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN" if you can't see three million illegals riding unicorns to the voting sites.....

Ex Output:
Non-sexual-explicit


Ex Input:
Comment: Really glad to see all of the Hillary lovers are out today,  I would much rather vote for an business person who can create jobs, one thing the article didn't mention is the thousands of people who made a lot of money off Trump's entrepreneur's acumen,  bankruptcy's laws are created for people who make mistakes or their timing is off or misjudgements in business,  most of the time who gets burned is greedy people looking for a big payoff,  not the small investors,  the fact remains he is still standing and still creating jobs and moving forward,  now Hillary makes bad judgements with people's lives and government money and continues to lie, cheat, steal and she is still standing,  so who do you vote for,  that is the question.

Ex Output:
Non-sexual-explicit


Ex Input:
Comment: a marxist? really? do you even believe yourself?

Ex Output:

Non-sexual-explicit