Given a document, an entity and its sentiment towards the entity, verify if it is the correct sentiment towards the entity. Answer should be yes or no. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

Example Input: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Pope Francis Letter is Negative . Well  it’s now happened.  The great scandal of the modern Catholic Church  —  its  tolerance for clergy who abuse children  and  its  laxity when dealing with bishops who themselves tolerated or enabled priest-abusers — now touches directly on  the pope himself .
 It ’s worth laying out the timeline clearly. In 2015  Pope Francis appointed Juan Barros Madrid to the bishopric of Osorno  Chile. The appointment was met with local protests  among Catholics and non-Catholics who believed that Barros was implicated in the crimes of child sexual abuse committed by his friend Father Fernando Karadima  a prominent Chilean churchman who habitually kissed and fondled boys. In the days after the installation of Barros at Osono  Pope Francis told an archbishop that there was “no objective reason at all” to oppose the appointment. The Vatican’s own department governing these matters  the Congregation for Bishops  released a statement saying they had “carefully examined the prelate’s candidature and did not find objective reasons to preclude the appointment.”
In the months following the appointment   Pope Francis  became extremely dismissive of complaints. “Osorno suffers  yes  for silliness ”  the pope  said of the outrage in the media. “Think with your head  and do not be carried away by the noses of the leftists  who are the ones who put this thing together ” he added.
A few weeks ago   Pope Francis ’s visit to Chile was marked by protests  and  the pope  continued  his  extremely brusque dismissal. “The day I see proof against Bishop Barros  then I will talk ” the pontiff said. “There is not a single piece of evidence against  him . It is all slander. Is that clear?”  Francis  said that no victims had come forward to  him . It was apparently this statement that caused Cardinal Sean O’Malley of Boston to scramble down to Chile and meet with the pope. After O’Malley’s intervention  presumably  the pope issued a half-apology  but repeated that the accusations against Barros were “slander” before adding  “I’m convinced he’s innocent.”
And now the news drops. In the time between the pope’s appointment of Barros and his commentary about protesters being carried away by leftists  members of the Vatican’s own Commission for the Protection of Minors gathered to discuss the appointment. They had a representative hand-deliver a letter to Pope Francis  from Carlos Cruz. The letter alleged  in lurid detail  that Barros had personally witnessed the abuse of Cruz at Karadima’s hands. Members of the commission photographed the hand-off of the letter to  the pope   to reassure Cruz that they were doing everything possible to make his cry for justice heard.
The facts as we know them leave us with a few interpretations. 1)  Pope Francis  simply never read the letter  ignoring this extraordinary intervention by the Vatican’s own commission on a matter of public controversy for  his  pontificate. 2)  Francis  read the letter but forgot about it  reverting to  his  original understanding of the case. 3)  Francis  read the letter  but stuck to  his  decision for Barros  committing unintentional or intentional deceptions about the state of  his  knowledge of the accusations. 4)  He  read the letter  but either doubted the accusations in it  or at least found them so unimpressive that  he  did not decide to follow up on them.
The first explanation would mean that  Francis  was culpably ignorant. The second that  he  may lack the mental or moral faculties to competently govern the Catholic Church. The third that  he  is too stubborn or vain to change course in the face of evidence. And the last that  he  has little trust or faith in the Commission on the Protection of Minors to pass on credible counsel to  him . Perhaps more reporting or disclosure will change our understanding  but none of these are satisfactory.
Example Output: no

Example Input: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Rick Pitino is Neutral . Rick Pitino  admitted to having sexual relations with the wife of  his  teamâs equipment manager. Louisville brought  him  back. A former Cardinals staffer arranged for strippers and prostitutes to have sex with players and recruits in the teamâs dormitory.  Pitino  denied any knowledge of  it  and kept  his  job. Only when the feds got involved did the ax finally fall: Louisville fired the Hall of Fame coach last month after an FBI investigation found an executive from Adidas and others conspired to steer top recruits to Louisville via six-figure payments to their families  with  Pitino  allegedly being aware of the scheme.
ESPN commentator Dick Vitale  for one  thinks  Pitino  deserves yet another chance.
Auriemma  the Hall of Fame coach of the Connecticut womenâs team  told the âPardon My Takeâ podcast earlier this month that he would hire  Pitino  for his coaching staff if he had an opening.
 Pitino  was officially fired Oct. 16  so Auriemmaâs definition of time served is rather peculiar. In any case  more has come out about  Pitinoâs  alleged role in the scheme since the U.S. Justice Departmentâs initial announcement  which maintained that an AAU coach named Christian Dawkins called Pitino to ask him for help in securing a six-figure payment to the family of highly regarded recruit Brian Bowen. A new federal indictment against former Adidas executive Jim Gatto  released this week  alleges  Pitino  not only was aware of the scheme â as was previously thought â but agreed to participate in it.
âDawkins explained that while [ Pitino ] and the University of Louisville were recruiting [Bowen]  Dawkins asked [ Pitino ] to call James Gatto to request that [Adidas] provide the money requested by the family of [Bowen]  which [ Pitino ] agreed to do â the indictment reads.
Example Output: yes

Example Input: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Matthew Gabriele is Negative . A Virginia Tech professor was hit with swift backlash after tweeting Monday that âthe modern GOP is nothing but white supremacyâ â but  Matthew Gabriele  only doubled down and hit back in response.
As you can imagine  Gabrieleâs tweet didnât sit well with more than a few commenters. The responses ranged from a suggestion that  Gabriele  back up  his  assertion by stepping down from  his  job so a person of color can have it to those who said  his  attitude is exactly what got Republican President Donald Trump elected last year.
Despite the heavy backlash   Gabriele  didnât edit or delete  his  post  explain  himself  or offer an apology for  his  decidedly inflammatory tweet.  He  simply hit back:
Campus Reform reported that  Gabriele  didnât respond after the outlet reached out to  him  for comment.
Example Output:
no