The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the self-need strategy, otherwise output No. self-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to create a personal need for an item in the negotiation, such as by pointing out that the participant sweats a lot to show preference towards water packages.
--------
Question: Context: 'i really need water and food. we did not get enough of those.' 'Those are my priorities as well, how about you get all the food and two firewoods, and i get all the water and one firewood, does that sound fair?' 'i would prefer water instead of food if possible, but i am sure we can work it out.'
Utterance: 'water is really important for me, how about i get two waters and three firewoods and you get three foods and one water?'

Answer: Yes


Question: Context: 'May I ask how many are going camping with you, i would agree, but the needs of children are different than adults. I will need at least 1 food, to ensure I have enough for the kids. ' 'We will have 50 adults with us. How about 2 firewood, 1 food, 1 water for you?🙂' 'lots of work for the both of us, at least you will have lots of help on you end. I accept the 2 firewood specially if you have elderly with you. will you be okay if give me 2 foods? '
Utterance: 'True, 2 firewood and 2 food for you and I'll take 3 waters.'

Answer: No


Question: Context: 'Hmmm.  And the firewood?' 'I get cold easily. I need the firewood to get warm. I might catch a cold.🙂' 'I think water should be your priority.  You have food and firewood also in your basics.  I will let you have the 3 water but I will need the 3 Firewood and the 3 Food.  I have a medical condition.'
Utterance: 'Okay that works well. I accept! 🙂'

Answer:
No