TASK DEFINITION: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.
PROBLEM: Comment: It's funny that when a black person commits an outlandish crime, all black people are implicated by association.  But when a white person commits an outlandish crime, it's just that person and they don't represent all white people. I'm almost 60, raised good, responsible children, contributed to society as a hard worker in several successful careers, and have never been arrested for anything (not even a speeding ticket). Yet, I'm lumped together with these two hoods who robbed a bank simply because they're black and I'm black!

SOLUTION: Identity-attack

PROBLEM: Comment: Trump 100% fascist in his bogus Foreign Policy, as he invites Ally Nations (Israel) to PAY for U.S. Troops incl. intervention/protection. 
Yup, if you are rich (Israel: U.S. Govt. Aid Gravy Train) and a friendly nation, you can RENT U.S. Military Power to smite your foes. I have never before seen a President "Advertising the U.S. Military as a Mercenary Force" to win your conflict.
 So basically, the state of Israel as an American backed Welfare State, is going to Give BACK U.S. Taxpayers, their OWN State Welfare money (AID) to rent U.S. Military Forces in the Middle East. 
Trump has validated this publicly; this is WORSE than Iran/Contra Affair of sanctioned Drug Dealing by CIA for Arms/armed subversive mercenaries in the Middle East. Trump is not about ending US Aid, he just wants to FUNNEL it all to Israel. This is about Trump grabbing the Gold left in the wake of the power vacuum of the Arab Spring in the Middle East. The Israelis are mining for Arab Spring Gold, using US Troops.

SOLUTION: Non-identity-attack

PROBLEM: Comment: The article says NOTHING about a right of way. And WTF is your point, anyway? A landowner owns the land under a right of way, it only has easement for certain purposes such as utilities and road maintenance. It was half in the guys yard, doesn't matter if it was in the road right-of-way or a utility right-of-way. Makes no difference, unless the land owner was infringing on the use of the right of way for its legitimate purposes. Now you read the article again and get back to me, because you're really pushing reason.

SOLUTION:
Non-identity-attack