In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Comment: Gee.. don't know about that.. The article was quite sarcastic, but then suppose that is what comedy is all about..

Though, this topic was not about a CBC comedy series... this is a serious issue for both sides, but then that is another Canadian perspective.

Further, there seems, as well, to be much larger issues which are at play globally concerning this religion; it seems to have a number of jihadist terror organizations that are associated with it -- that right there could be the poisonous fly in the ointment ; clearer communication from all facets of the Muslim World needs to be spoken to that reality, including an explanatory resonance of reason concerning of this non-integration with 'Infidels and Jews'..

There are a number of issues that are 'fluffed-off' which is a darn good reason why 'martyrdom' is not what is needed here by Islam -- a good solid sit-down integrated respectful discussion with all the players is.. both Male & Female.. with or without the religious sartorial.
Obscene

Comment: Prorogue
Harper proroguing Parliament was to stop an UNDEMOCRATIC attempt by the sore losers to form a Coalition to steal the election from the winning Conservatives
.
it was pathetic watching such "democrats" as Chretien and Ed Broadbent trotting up Parliament Hill with that intention
.
Proroguing by Harper is a tool in the Rule Book, so it is not undemocratic at all
Non-obscene

Comment: School vouchers is by far the best way to educate our children and to save the state budget. Government schools are too expensive and should be closed

Non-obscene