Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
--------
Question: There would still have to be a disable designated sign on the vehicle.  I don't think someone on one of these bikes would park there if they don't have a tag.

Answer: No


Question: You have grossly misinterpreted that phrase. There is nothing in the 2nd Amendment that says or states one cannot carry concealed or open carry. It does however state clearly the right must NOT be infringed upon. Know what infringed means?

Infringed:
act so as to limit or undermine (something); encroach on.

it's pretty obvious the 9th circuit was wrong in it's decision. Which by the way will be overturned by the US Supreme Court. The 9th Circuit holds the record for most cases/rulings overturned by the Supreme court.

Answer: No


Question: DOG OWNER YOU ARE GUILTY FOR EVEN THINKING IT OK TO HAVE YOUR DOG CHARGE A KID..YOUR PROPERTY OR NOT,( live in a fence less hood where yes 4 new kids could wonder onto)
YOU FAILED IN YOUR DUTY TO YOUR DOG, ONCE SHE CHOOSE TO RUN AT A SMALL CHILD, YOU SHOULD HAVE PULLED THE TRIGGER ON HER SHOCK COLLAR OR YOUR GUN. 
YES TO PROTECT THE LITTLE CHILD. 
YOUR LUCKY THAT DOG DIDNT GET THAT KID OR YOU MAY BE DEALING WITH A MAULED CHILD TODAY!!! 
THIS KID COULD BE DEAD TODAY!!
DOG OWNER TAKE SOME OWNERSHIP AND ADMIT YOU SHOULD HAVE HAD YOUR DOG RESTRAINED WHILE 4 NEW KIDS UNDER 9 WERE MOVING IN!!!!

YOUR SO DAMM LUCKY SHE DIDNT GET THAT KID WITHOUT HIS FATHER THERE, KID WOULD HAVE WONDERERD OVER TO YOUR YARD LOOKING FOR HIS BALL AND BEEN KILLED BY YOUR DOG!!
AND THE SAD TRUTH IM RIGHT AND YOU KNOW IT!!!

Answer:
Yes