We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Input: Consider Input: Sent1: While criminal trials not involving the death penalty can also involve mistakes, there is at least the opportunity for those mistakes to be corrected.
 Sent2: That should be a crime which should result in the death penalty.

Output: Not similar


Input: Consider Input: Sent1: You cannot kill somebody just because they've broken into your house, you have to have a well founded fear of harm.
 Sent2: If you chose to kill someone who wasn't endangering your life at the moment you deserve to be killed.

Output: Not similar


Input: Consider Input: Sent1: Besides I'm not saying we should apply the death penalty in all instances of murder for example.
 Sent2: The death penalty is not used for what it is supposed to be used for.


Output: Not similar