TASK DEFINITION: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.
PROBLEM: Comment: HIS small white penis is showing

SOLUTION: Sexual-explicit

PROBLEM: Comment: Its funny watching the left twist themselves into knots defending religious views that literally oppress women.

This is why the left cannot be taken seriously on almost any matter. The same hypocrites who ranted and raved about Donald Trump were silent about Harvey Weinstein. They have marches and wear ribbons and talk about women’s rights and then say we have no right to step in when a religion oppresses women on what they can wear or do. 

Meanwhile if a Christian says women shouldn’t be allowed to have an abortion they go ape**** protest and riot saying and I quote “no one should be able to tell a woman what to do with her body”. How the F is this any different?

The selective and hypocritical morality of the left should be ignored as it is nonsensical and illogical. The ban should stand, otherwise what the law is saying is all religions are equal, except for islam which will get an exception every time. Thus the beginning of sharia law.

SOLUTION: Non-sexual-explicit

PROBLEM: Comment: The importance of this particular poster is demonstrated by how effectively she has turned this entire discussion from the article to herself.  It happens all the time, because she is a bigly Catholic who, in keeping with the example of our Holy Bishops, only harasses, threatens, berates, belittles, and lies when the recipient deserves it.  In this, she exemplifies the virtues demonstrated by the Bishops, and is thus a great christian.   I have no doubt you will repent soon, in the face of such impressive logic and reason.

SOLUTION:
Non-sexual-explicit