We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

[Q]: Sent1: You might say the criminal deserved it, but murder is murder, whether they deserved it or not.
 Sent2: You are probably going to murder somebody; hopefully it will b in a place with the death penalty and then you will get what you deserve.
[A]: Not similar


[Q]: Sent1: If somebody is completely innocent and they are executed for a crime they didn't commit (which, with forensics these days, probably will never happen again), that is a problem.
 Sent2: This process is needed in order to ensure that innocent men and woman are not executed for crimes they did not commit, and even with these protections the risk of executing an innocent person can not be completely eliminated.
[A]: Similar


[Q]: Sent1: The death penalty is about specific crimes, not any crimes.
 Sent2: People who will commit a crime with life in prison would probably still commit the crime with capital punishment.
[A]:
Not similar