In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

[EX Q]: Sentence: I saw Jim yelling at some guy in a military uniform with a huge red  beard. I don't know why he was, but he looked very unhappy.
 Reason: The 'he' refers to jim because yelling comes from unhappy person. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
[EX A]: Correct

[EX Q]: Sentence: Beth didn't get angry with Sally, who had cut her off, because she stopped and counted to ten.
 Reason: The 'she' refers to beth because Sally apologizing is why beth didn't get angry. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
[EX A]: Wrong

[EX Q]: Sentence: As Andrea in the crop duster passed over Susan, she could see the landing strip.
 Reason: The 'she' refers to andrea because strip is more likely to duster. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
[EX A]:
Correct