We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Ex Input:
Sent1: You can not use this as evidence that the reduction in crime is due to the gun ban.
 Sent2: It is just a case of prevention, remove guns being so easily accessible and you then decrease the gun crime and remove the need for guns to defend yourself.

Ex Output:
Not similar


Ex Input:
Sent1: It dealt with an individual right and further indentified the limits of that right to be certain that the RKBA provision would not be construed to protect the carrying of concealed weapons.
 Sent2: Well, owning handguns for personal home protection is different that carrying guns in a concealed fashion for protection.

Ex Output:
Not similar


Ex Input:
Sent1: Gun control will not work because criminals do not obey gun control laws.
 Sent2: If this is the case, then gun laws have a provable effect on how 'armed' criminals are - more gun control = less gun-carrying criminals, fact.

Ex Output:

Not similar