In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: toxic and non-toxic. Toxicity is defiend as anything that is rude, disrespectful, or unreasonable that would make someone want to leave a converation.

Q: Comment: Is there a village that wants this idiot?

A: Toxic
****
Q: Comment: An asshole!

A: Toxic
****
Q: Comment: I am saddened that the Post editorial board has so thoroughly drunk the reform Cool-Aid that has plagued our schools for over a decade. Under this current School Board, we have seen school closures, increased re-segregation, the warehousing of low-income kids in under-funded, struggling schools, the degradation of the teaching profession leading to record-level teacher turnover and shortages, academic and college remediation stagnation, in short, policies that have failed to give Denver the world-class schools it deserves. How the Post can be advocating sticking to such a lackluster series of policies and people is beyond me. If you want kids who can't read and charter chains making money hand over fist, feel free to support the Post's recommended candidates. If, however, you want a Board who will really listen to the needs and concerns of parents and communities, vote for Tay Anderson (District 4), Robert Speth (At Large), Carrie Olson (District 3) and Sochi Gaitan (District 2).

A:
Non-toxic
****