instruction:
The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the self-need strategy, otherwise output No. self-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to create a personal need for an item in the negotiation, such as by pointing out that the participant sweats a lot to show preference towards water packages.
question:
Context: 'Hello, how are you today? 🙂' 'good, how are you 🙂'
Utterance: 'Great!  I'm on a camping trip with my five children, how about you?'
answer:
No


question:
Context: 'Interesting - you're essentially saying that you need the majority of two of the three items. Hmm...' 'Yes, thats all. I need 1/3 food, 2/3 water, and 2/3 firewood.' 'Still not convinced in any way that you need more items in total over me. Please clarify!'
Utterance: 'Food is what I prioritize much more than the others. If you want the majority of the others, I will need all the food.'
answer:
No


question:
Context: 'I'd be willing to give you extra food if I could then get extra water and firewood. How about you Get 2 food, 1 water and 1 firewood?' 'That sounds almost fair. But I could possibly use 1 more firewood. What do you think?🙂🙂' 'Idk, you're already getting the extra food which would be important to me. I think my offer is very fair for both of us.'
Utterance: 'I'm not sure either. Well them, how about we switch and you can have 2 food, 1 water, and 1 firewood and I will take the rest. The homeless could use water almost as much as food'
answer:

No