In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: toxic and non-toxic. Toxicity is defiend as anything that is rude, disrespectful, or unreasonable that would make someone want to leave a converation.

Q: Comment: MOST PETS of PROGRESSIVES are SEX TOYS for the FAMILY
NIGERS LOVE PIT BULL PENIS---
BARRACK said it TASTE LIKE CHICKEN
MIKE BARRACKS MATE said BARRACK COULD TAKE AN ANAL DB with DOGS THREE TIMES a DAY
EVERY CALL to PRAYERS EVERY MUSLUM OFFERS HIS ASS to the DOGS---
and THEY LOVE IT

A: Toxic
****
Q: Comment: Trump is a buffoon.
And a traitor.
He has absolutely no redeeming qualities whatsoever.
He's disgusting.

A: Toxic
****
Q: Comment: There is no "disproportionate representation of Montreal, Toronto, and their suburbs" if that's what you mean by "eastern urban."  It's called representation by population.

There's a debate to be held about the weight of corporate interests in Canada, and the issue of "One Canada" is also a subject for legitimate discussion.  Neither is furthered by promoting animosity towards half the country as your comment did.  Wrong-headed conceptions of the constitutional structure of Canada don't help, either.

A:
Non-toxic
****