In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: threat and non-threat. Threat is a statement that someone will be hurt or harmed, especially if the person does not do something in particular.

Q: Comment: Actually, "The high (Supreme Court of Canada) court decision Thursday narrowly defines the crime of bestiality as penetration involving a person and an animal -- meaning it doesn't cover other forms of sexual activity." Someone used that in their defence to avoid being convicted for bestiality (though he was convicted of sexually molesting his young step-daughters).   So, don't be too sure about the bestiality thing...

A: Non-threat
****
Q: Comment: It burned? This is some good news. Purged by fire, finally.

A: Threat
****
Q: Comment: Here we have a protected minority maliciously and publicly mocking another person for their religious beliefs.  Anyone else see the epic hypocrisy in that?   We all know that if the driver was a Muslim imam, JJ would NEVER say anything derogatory about him, in spite of the fact that Islam is radically misogynistic and homophobic.  Scratching my head.

A:
Non-threat
****