In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: toxic and non-toxic. Toxicity is defiend as anything that is rude, disrespectful, or unreasonable that would make someone want to leave a converation.

[Q]: Comment: It's been lamented that the time and expense to reinforce basic seamanship skills have been sacrificed for more intensive tactical training, which implies far greater reliance on electronic sensors and computers than ever before.  Even in the US Navy, there is no such thing as a limitless budget or limitless time. 

I suspect this accident will be attributed to something as simple as not following the "rules of the road" by failure to yield the right of way.  Publicly accessible resources now strongly suggest the USS John S. McCain was the vessel CROSSING a heavily used traffic lane, and therefore the onus was on its crew to avoid vessels transiting that lane. 

If true, then another Captain's naval career, plus the careers of all other crew members held responsible, will be flushed down the toilet.  We mustn't ever forget that shipmate's lives were lost and that drowning is far from a painless death.
[A]: Non-toxic


[Q]: Comment: Or Cecil...Or D-Mac...Or BIG Al
[A]: Non-toxic


[Q]: Comment: Scott:  You mention "current" abuse.  Would you be good enough to expand on your contention.  I presume you're referencing a possible initiative which might lead to a further initiativve to control aerial spraying of herbicides.  If, indeed, that is your concern, fine, you should be addressing that particular issue, not supporting an "end run" effort which would give the Board veto power over all initiatives which Lane County voters have worked hard to, and have in fact, qualified for the ballot.  May I again state: The initiative process comes with "built-in" checks to "weed out" frivolous measures.  First, it requires a significant number of petition signatures to qualify for the ballot.  Secondly, it requires a majority of voters to support its adoption. Thirdly, it,like all ordinances, would be subject to judicial review.  At each step proponents must make a convincing argument that the measure is a) constitutional and b) desirable.  This process is called DEMOCRACY.
[A]:
Non-toxic