instruction:
Given a document, an entity and its sentiment towards the entity, verify if it is the correct sentiment towards the entity. Answer should be yes or no. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].
question:
Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Sensei Johnny is Positive . March 2 (UPI) — The latest trailer for YouTube Red’s upcoming Cobra Kai series shows William Zabka’s  Johnny  as a ruthless sensei.
“I’m going to teach you the style of karate that was taught to me. Fear does not exist in this dojo  does it?”  Sensei Johnny  asks a student  calling back to the Cobra Kai mantra  he  obeyed as a competitive teen in the 1984 film The Karate Kid.
“No  sensei!”  his  follower barks back.
“Pain does not exist in this dojo  does it?”  Johnny  challenges another group of students.
“ Johnny Lawrence  is still fighting  his  old nemesis Daniel LaRusso. Rivalries never die  even 30 years later ” said a message accompanying the 30-second preview  which does not show Ralph Macchio reprising his role of the balance-seeking good guy Daniel.
answer:
yes


question:
Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Donald J. Trump is Negative . The Iranian ballistic missile launch that  President Donald Trump  tweeted about Saturday apparently never happened.
On Saturday   Trump  tweeted: âIran just test-fired a Ballistic Missile capable of reaching Israel.They are also working with North Korea.Not much of an agreement we have!â
Iran just test-fired a Ballistic Missile capable of reaching Israel.They are also working with North Korea.Not much of an agreement we have! â Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) September 23  2017
 Trump  has been criticized a number of times for jumping to conclusions and commenting on Twitter before breaking news reports have been confirmed.
As of Monday night   he  had not deleted the erroneous tweet.
Separately  Twitter Inc. TWTR  -2.30% on Monday explained that it would not block Trumpâs more incendiary tweets because they are newsworthy. Some had complained to Twitter that  his  threats toward North Korean leader Kim Jong Un â which North Korea said Monday it took as a âdeclaration of warâ â violated the companyâs terms of service.
answer:
yes


question:
Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Steve Bannon is Neutral . The attempts to curtail testimony to congressional investigators became clear this week when  former White House chief strategist Steve Bannon  appeared before the House Intelligence Committee and infuriated both sides of the aisle by refusing to answer questions about  his  work during the presidential transition and in the White House.
At some points during  Bannon 's six hours of closed-door testimony   his  attorney took breaks to confer via telephone with the White House counsel's office to clarify what questions could be answered and came back with the same guidance:  Bannon  could not discuss any activities related to the transition or  his  tenure in the White House.
 Bannon 's team negotiated ground rules with the White House counsel's office the week prior to his appearance before the House Intelligence Committee  according to a source familiar with the situation.
The President's personal legal team was aware of discussions between the White House counsel's office and  Bannon 's lawyer about protecting a possible privilege claim. But it wasn't their decision  according to a person familiar with the discussions. The protection of the privilege is a matter for the White House  not the President's legal team  because it relates to the office.
Before the hearing   Bannon 's lawyer informed a staff member of Rep. Devin Nunes  the California Republican who chairs the House Intelligence Committee  that  Bannon  planned to claim executive privilege on topics beyond the presidential campaign  a source said.
But that information was apparently tightly held. "It caught me personally by surprise" that  Bannon  asserted executive privilege  said Rep. Mike Conaway  the Texas Republican leading the committee's Russia investigation.
South Carolina Rep. Trey Gowdy and Florida Rep. Tom Rooney  the other two Republicans leading the Russia probe along with Conaway  also said they weren't aware of any agreement between the White House and committee staff about the scope of  Bannon 's testimony.
"They wouldn't do that because I'd ask what I think is relevant to ask  and if you've got a legal privilege you can assert it " Gowdy said  adding that  Bannon  was in a "legally indefensible position."
As it became clear on Tuesday that  Bannon  was refusing to answer questions  the committee served  him  with a subpoena to compel  him  to divulge additional information.
But the scope of what  Bannon  was claiming was privileged shocked members from both parties.
" His  version of executive privilege is it covers the transition  the time  he  was at the White House and covers time forever " Gowdy told Fox News Wednesday. "That is no one's definition of executive privilege."
Lawmakers were also offended that  Bannon  had already divulged details about some of  his  post-campaign activities in Michael Wolff's explosive book "Fire and Fury " but then refused to discuss those events with the committee.  Bannon 's attorney also informed members that he would  in fact  answer those questions when he meets with special counsel Robert Mueller's team because executive privilege doesn't apply to Mueller's investigation.
Democrats charge that  Bannon 's appearance before the House committee marks the broadest attempt so far at using privilege to shield events that occurred from the moment Trump was elected.
Republicans haven't ruled out the possibility of holding  Bannon  in contempt  but at least one GOP member -- Gowdy -- suggested it was unlikely.
House Speaker Paul Ryan downplayed the issue of whether witnesses like  Bannon  might be abusing the bounds of executive privilege.
Still   Bannon 's stonewalling sparked a sharp warning from Conaway -- the Republican leading the House Russia probe -- to White House aides who might follow the Bannon model: "We're going to insist on getting questions we need to answer our report."
answer:

yes