In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: insult and non-insult. Insult is any lanugage or act that is disrespectful or scornfully abusive.
--------
Question: Comment: Pretty silly waiting to purchase a river king when a person can purchase a fresh winter king out of Southeast Alaska starting October through May.

Answer: Insult


Question: Comment: If it was against the law then why did they "let him off" with a warning about being inappropriate and not wrong ? I don't advocate taking these kinds of pictures and don't do it myself, but nobody here, including Motley Fool has made a case that the guy broke the law. And in my, psychologically damaged, mind he may have acted rudely and cruely, but did not break the law. And, again, if the woman is so bothered by people looking at or taking pictures of he bare flesh then she can cover it up. AND she didn't seem to have an issue with it until she was denied a promotion, unless I am reading the story incorrectly.

Answer: Non-insult


Question: Comment: You should look in the mirror to see the racist.   And no race is not the 'obvious' factor in this discussion to anyone BUT a racist.   The topic isn't race it's illegal immigration.   The illegal immigrants could be ANY RACE and the same would apply.   Only the racist makes a non 'race' topic about race.

Answer:
Non-insult