We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

Example Input: If you choose to not be prepared and not own a gun, that is your choice, you do not however have the right to tell me that I may not.
Example Output: Valid

Example Input: All that does is imply that crime rate depends on more than just the presence/absence of guns - it disproves 'more guns = more crime' about as much as it disproves 'more guns = less crime'.
Example Output: Valid

Example Input: At least it does show self defense is now recognized as a legal deterrant and perfectly normal, lawful act that cannot be discredited.
Example Output:
Valid