In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Example Input: Comment: So you're saying the Chuch leaders should publicly criticize Bill Clinton, Jessie Jackson, Bill Cosby, Al Gore, Democratic supporter Harvey Weinstein, Democrat Kevin Spacey, etc. for their sexual violence?

How about Hillary the enabler?
Example Output: Non-obscene

Example Input: Comment: Stay on this site long enough, Lewis, and you'll get a clear picture that Craig is a racist.  S(he) trolls this site to post bigot or racists comments against the homeless, Natives, and the LGBT populations.
Example Output: Non-obscene

Example Input: Comment: Your adjectives are highly questionable and rhetorical.  An "enemy" ? A critic is an "enemy" ?  Who determines "a good thing"?  You ?  And your "good thing" must be "good" for everybody ? What if it is not ?

She is a "religious ideologue" How on earth do you define that ?  Can she be an "ideologue" who just happens to be "religious" ? Are you saying a "religious person is unfit to serve in a public office ? That is surely what it sounds like.

These are just simply your opinions that will resonate with those who think like you. You are going to need to give us something better than this. We do not need a lifelong school system employee to watch the henhouse, as so many lead us to believe. I have a very brief conversation with former 4J sup George Russell a few years ago, who basically told me NOBODY except a person from the system can run school district - I saw hogwash. There are millions of brilliant people in this country and they do not all work for the School District.
Example Output:
Non-obscene