Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.

Q: You all are pedo loving pussys i know this comment will get rejected like my last but thats okay you still see it when you say it isnt civil. SHOOT ALL THE PEDOS AND NIGGERS!

A: Yes
****
Q: You're a lot of things, Dick, but I'm pretty sure lawbreaker isn't one of them.

These crimes are coming from the same small demographic involved in the same illicit activities. As long as you avoid association with scumbags, you have nothing to worry about.

Yes people will try to rob weed businesses. Just like they rob banks, coffee stands, and convenience stores. Criminals go where the money is. However, consider that banks, coffee stands, and convenience stores are not required to have the same security as cannabusinesses are. That's right, not even banks.

The sky's only falling inside your head.

A: Yes
****
Q: Something you may be missing, Elmore.  If a dog charges, people react differently depending on circumstances like whether they are accompanied by defenseless children, who can be eviscerated in an instant.  Any parent who would trust their child's welfare to the goodwill of an agitated animal is not a fit parent.   Interjecting yourself into the scenario, and claiming you would slam the door, or kick the dog is nothing more than Monday-morning quarterbacking, since you did not witness the circumstances.  There are a lot of hysterical commenters here who would rather see you face down a grizzly bear empty-handed, then blame you for smelling like food, or not following their bear-wise precautions.  I'm talking about the backwards-thinking people who commend killing the unborn, then over-compensate through fanatical defense of animals: a cowardly position which costs them nothing, and still lets them feel like Gandhi.

A:
Yes
****