In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Ex Input:
Comment: Why would anyone "look into" something so ignorant, and easily proven wrong?

Ex Output:
Non-obscene


Ex Input:
Comment: Fucking bullshit. "Best care available", lock up the seaworld trainers  around metal walls in a crammy room. FFS Tilikum only attacked due to stress, when he and his other fellow whales do not preform well doing rehearsals, they are not fed, in which the other whales attack Tilikum for some food, raking him with their teeth. And his dorsal fin? A healthy whale's fin is straight, not floppy. To hell with the trainers he killed, they deserved that shit.

Ex Output:
Obscene


Ex Input:
Comment: It's a false Christianity that supposes one can love someone by going along with their rejection of God's will, and even "celebrate it"!

It's a false Christianity to suppose that one have a "private interpretation" of the divine positive law. 

It's a false Christianity to think that funerals are merely our action, and that their main purpose is "to give us closure".

'Loving our neighbor as yourself' is much much much bigger than you're thinking about. 

And it is telling that you left out the first part of that passage. 

Christianity is about learning to love with the very heart of Christ, which took Him to the Cross, in obedience to His Father and out of love for us.

The little view of Christianity generates a bunch of sad and petulent people.

Ex Output:

Non-obscene