We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Example Input: Sent1: So if you want to ban guns, 1,531,764 people will get killed or injured, and you'll only take guns out of the hands of those who don't even commit gun crimes.
 Sent2: You can debate that without guns there would be more deaths to other weapons although you can't debate it would be to the same extent as gun murders and crimes would be.
Example Output: Not similar

Example Input: Sent1: If today we were to ban guns all the law abiding citizens would give up their firearms and protection.
 Sent2: Gun bans simple ban law abiding citizens from having guns.
Example Output: Similar

Example Input: Sent1: If you want any protection for your rights, you have to be able to present an argument outlining how they are being violated.
 Sent2: The gun lobby likes to give lip service to the idea of rights and freedom but every time they oppose reasonable safety measures intended to protect people's rights they show where they really stand.
Example Output:
Not similar