In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

[EX Q]: Comment: Your coyness doesn't  work with anyone, as everyone knows that your "Drunks' Lives Matter" and "Don't Shoot" is mocking blacks and their Black Lives Matter and "Don't Shoot." Not everyone is as stupid as you.
[EX A]: Identity-attack

[EX Q]: Comment: >> .. showing off the clowns and animals! I guess things haven't changed! 

Just a bit.  We have politicians now,  showing off ... up close and personal,
[EX A]: Non-identity-attack

[EX Q]: Comment: Regarding your numbers, Dennis:  based on the priests that I have known in my lifetime, I would say that the vast majority of those who were unmarried were gay -- 80% (and I am being generous on the side of not overstating), at the very least.  (And for those who are inclined to quarrel with me about married priests, please remember that in my Church (rite), that's permitted.)  I think that is what makes this entire issue so ridiculous to me -- most of those who are insisting that gay men may not become priests are themselves gay.
[EX A]:
Identity-attack