In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: threat and non-threat. Threat is a statement that someone will be hurt or harmed, especially if the person does not do something in particular.

Comment: Here we have a protected minority maliciously and publicly mocking another person for their religious beliefs.  Anyone else see the epic hypocrisy in that?   We all know that if the driver was a Muslim imam, JJ would NEVER say anything derogatory about him, in spite of the fact that Islam is radically misogynistic and homophobic.  Scratching my head.
Non-threat

Comment: Sadly in rural Alaska, particularly in Southwest Alaska due to SB91, there is nonexistent prosecution for SA. I have seen SA1, penetration without consent, dropped to harrassment. No kidding. Get raped, the guy gets out in six weeks. It is done to protect the sexual offenders from having sex crimes on their records. And only once in 40 years have I seen someone prosecuted on the 3-strikes your out sex law. You can have all the laws on the books you want, but if the DA's, Public Defenders and judges collude to NOT prosecute, what are you going to do?
Non-threat

Comment: what absolute childish hate you live in, alberta is as much Canadian as any other buddy. alberta has been supporting the ROC with billions a year in equalization net funding. but now its the heck with alberta? what a arrogant east end mentality

Non-threat