We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

Q: "We could even grant animals a right to bring suit without insisting that animals are persons, or that they are not property," Sunstein said on page 11 of Animal Rights: Current Debates and New Directions (2004).

A: Invalid
****
Q: The civil rights violators claim they want to keep guns out of the wrong hands, when the truth of the matter is you and I "have the wrong hands"

A: Valid
****
Q: What's worse is that an officer may have to examine five hundred or even five thousand cars just to find a single gun.

A:
Valid
****