Given a document and an entity the task is to select the author's sentiment towards the entity. Sentiments can be Positive, Neutral and Negative. Select Positive if the article expresses a positive view towards the given entity or praises its quality or skills. Select Neutral if the document expresses no clear view towards the entity or has equal amounts of positive and negative statements or expressing some fact/quote by someone else. Select Negative if the article expresses a negative view towards like harsh remarks, criticizing entities action/decision etc. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

[Q]: What is the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Las Vegas-based Bigelow ? Built by  Las Vegas-based Bigelow  the company  now has  its  eye on taking  its  blow-up living area far beyond the space station  all the way to the moon.
Partnering with United Launch Alliance a joint venture of Boeing and Lockheed Martin Space Systems  Bigelow  said  it  hopes to send put the B330 expandable space habitat into lunar orbit by 2022.
Announcing the ambitious project this week   Bigelow  president Robert Bigelow said the fully autonomous space station would provide anchorage "for significant lunar business development in addition to offering NASA and other governments the moon as a new  exciting location to conduct long-term exploration and astronaut training.
 Bigelow  said  his  "lunar depot plan is a strong complement to other plans intended to eventually put people on Mars." Indeed  researchers at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology have suggested that billions of dollars could be saved by using the moon as a pit-stop for eventual missions to the red planet.
[A]: Positive


[Q]: What is the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Donald J. Trump ? Trump . (AP /Carolyn Kaster)
So much for the metaphysics of dynamic growth.  The Trump team  late last year argued the tax package would unleash so much economic activity that the Treasury wouldn’t notice a permanent  40 percent reduction in the corporate rate (the real reduction turned out to be 14 percent). The contention didn't survive the winter.
— Plan shifts burden to state and private money. NYT's Patricia Cohen and Alan Rappeport: " Trump ’s $200 billion plan to rebuild America upends the criteria that have long been used to pick ambitious federal projects  putting little emphasis on how much an infrastructure proposal benefits the public and more on finding private investors and other outside sources of money. Unveiled on Monday  the infrastructure program that  Mr. Trump  has championed since the campaign is intended to attract a huge amount of additional money from states  localities and private investors. The goal is to generate a total pot of $1.5 trillion to upgrade the country’s highways  airports and railroads. Those financial priorities are crystallized in the new guidelines established by the White House. The ability to find sources of funding outside the federal government will be the most important yardstick  accounting for 70 percent of the formula for choosing infrastructure projects. How “the project will spur economic and social returns on investment” ranks at the bottom  at just 5 percent."
Dems say  Trump  wants to cuts more than  he  spends. The Post's John Wagner: "Besides unveiling  his  infrastructure plan   Trump  also released  his  2019 budget blueprint Monday. Combing through it  the office of Senate Minority Leader Charles E. Schumer (D-N.Y.) identified more than $240 billion in proposed cuts over the coming decade to an array of existing infrastructure programs — a higher number than what  Trump  is proposing in 'new' spending."
 Trump  weighed in this morning:
Our infrastructure plan has been put forward and has received great reviews by everyone except  of course  the Democrats. After many years we have taken care of our Military  now we have to fix our roads  bridges  tunnels  airports and more. Bipartisan  make deal Dems? — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) February 13  2018
(The SEC and CFTC requests earned a rare nod of approval for the  Trump  administration from the watchdog group Better Markets  which called them "an important recognition that the cops on the Wall Street beat don’t have the funding they need to do their jobs protecting the American people.")
— Spending plans. Politico's Sarah Ferris: "Alongside its original budget request  the  Trump  administration Monday also released the details of what it would recommend doing with the extra money for domestic programs included in Congress' spending deal enacted last week. That includes an increase to the State Department  which the administration’s original document proposed to slash by 30 percent this coming fiscal year. The extra cash would go into the budget for the United Nations  humanitarian aid and global AIDS programs. Each of those efforts would have been cut under  Trump ’s original plan."
The Department of Rosy Scenario is doing a lot of work in  Trump 's budget. — Steven Dennis (@StevenTDennis) February 13  2018
— BAT redux. Politico's Doug Palmer: " Trump  on Monday said  he  wants to impose a "reciprocal tax" on imports from countries that have higher tariffs than the U.S. 'We are going to charge countries outside of our country — countries that take advantage of  the United States ' Trump  said at a White House meeting with state and local government officials about the administration's infrastructure plan...  Trump  seemed to be complaining about the U.S.' relatively low duty structure when compared with those of some other countries."
It surprised  his  aides  "who warned that no formal plans have been prepared " per WSJ's Michael Bender.
Dollar Stores Hammered by Trump Proposal to Abandon Food Stamps A  Trump  administration proposal to reduce food-stamp benefits is casting a cloud over U.S. dollar-store chains. Bloomberg
What did  Trump  propose cutting in  his  2019 budget? Check out this great graphic from the Post staff:
 President Trump  said the decline in U.S. infrastructure and increase in the deficit was caused by "laziness" after World War II:
[A]: Positive


[Q]: What is the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Donald Trump Jr. ? We know President Donald Trump during the campaign publicly encouraged the Russians to hack and release Hillary Clinton's emails. We know he referenced the WikiLeaks email dump 145 times in the closing days of the campaign. We also know that Donald Trump Jr.  Jared Kushner and then-campaign chairman Paul Manafort met with Russians in June 2016 with the promise of "dirt" on Hillary Clinton  and we have learned that campaign adviser George Papadopoulos had extensive contacts with Russian officials that included discussion of "dirt" on Clinton. To say that there is no evidence of collusion  then  would be one more big lie in a series of big lies the administration has deployed to defend itself in the Russia investigation that threatens to sink this presidency.
"Trump's eldest son exchanged private messages with WikiLeaks during the presidential campaign at the same time the website was publishing hacked emails from Democratic officials  according to correspondence made public Monday. Donald Trump Jr. did not respond to many of the notes  which were sent using the direct message feature on Twitter. But he alerted senior advisers on his father's campaign  including his brother-in-law  Jared Kushner  according to two people familiar with the exchanges.
Even more directly  Donald Trump Jr. was urged to have his father tweet a link to the leaked email:
However  at bottom this is also a political question  namely whether Trump's conduct violated his oath of office and whether he abused the powers of the presidency to protect himself from embarrassment. Republican tribalists likely will never reach that conclusion  but a member of Congress viewing in good faith all this evidence in context (plus  Trump 's attacks on the courts and press   his  compulsive lying and  his  refusal to protect the country against further Russian interference) could â and I would suggest  should â reach a different result. Surely if Hillary Clinton were president the Republicans would have already commenced impeachment proceedings.
 Donald Trump 's biggest flaw:  He 's not that bright
[A]:
Neutral