In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

Input: Consider Input: Comment: He was already a registered sex offender. This just put the seal on his need to be on the registry for life.

That being said I don't agree with the sex offender registry. It's a form of double punishment for criminals who have served their time. If they can't trust them to not offend again then don't let them out at all.

Output: Non-identity-attack


Input: Consider Input: Comment: "Knew what he signed up for is the ultimate compliment".  it means that he was willing to put his life on the line for the country, not that he deserved to die.  so sad to see how this has been twisted.  really sick

Output: Non-identity-attack


Input: Consider Input: Comment: Sylvia - I get your passion. Black and Brown men are probably very scary to you. But "unarmed" means there really should be no reason to use lethal force. Cops are trained to use a plethora of techniques that are non-lethal - it's just clear that more and more cops are surpassing their training and jumping to lethal force more quickly and, in many cases, unnecessarily - especially against black men and boys. 

"Protecting" a community by labeling it "criminal" and brutalizing it is similar to the logic used by every dictatorship in history - speaking of ignorance. And not sure what evidence you have or logic you're using for your "...letting out white predators earlier so they can go back to predatorializing on white communities..." rant.


Output: Identity-attack