In this task, you will be presented with a context from an academic paper and a question separated with a 
. You have to answer the question based on the context.

To show the effectiveness of our approach, we show results on the SICK dataset BIBREF1, a common benchmark for logic-based NLI, and find MonaLog to be competitive with more complicated logic-based approaches (many of which require full semantic parsing and more complex logical machinery). 
 Question: Do they beat current state-of-the-art on SICK?
No

Stanford - Twitter Sentiment Corpus (STS Corpus): STS Corpus contains 1,600K training tweets collected by a crawler from BIBREF0 . BIBREF0 constructed a test set manually with 177 negative and 182 positive tweets. The Stanford test set is small. However, it has been widely used in different evaluation tasks BIBREF0 BIBREF5 BIBREF13 .

Sanders - Twitter Sentiment Corpus: This dataset consists of hand-classified tweets collected by using search terms: INLINEFORM0 , #google, #microsoft and #twitter. We construct the dataset as BIBREF14 for binary classification.

Health Care Reform (HCR): This dataset was constructed by crawling tweets containing the hashtag #hcr BIBREF15 . Task is to predict positive/negative tweets BIBREF14 . 
 Question: Which datasets did they use?
Stanford - Twitter Sentiment Corpus (STS Corpus) Sanders - Twitter Sentiment Corpus Health Care Reform (HCR)

This step was followed by a pre-processing stage where the texts were normalized by replacing zero-width-non-joiner (ZWNJ) BIBREF2 and manually verifying the orthography based on the reference orthography of the Kurdistan Region of Iraq. 
 Question: How is the corpus normalized?

by replacing zero-width-non-joiner (ZWNJ) BIBREF2 and manually verifying the orthography