We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gay Marriage) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gay marriage. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gay marriage.

[EX Q]: Gays should be allowed to have an official civil partnership which has the same legal status as marriage.
[EX A]: Valid

[EX Q]: POTS and kettles dude since this is my thread and the topic of aids has nothing to do with why people think that they have the right to vote on my marriage.
[EX A]: Valid

[EX Q]: Is that an "ideal" marriage (since they're so insistent on "ideal situations" being used as criteria for things like adopting children) -- one in which the potential for procreation (remember?
[EX A]:
Valid