In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.
--------
Question: Comment: You are truly a pessimist! I know you don't like "Pocahontas" or Chuck Schumer, but either would be a better administrator than Trump, who doesn't seem to be getting the picture. I could be wrong, but I don't think Pence has national appeal.

Answer: Non-sexual-explicit


Question: Comment: It's obvious  that the man hates pussy, lol, I guess everyone has the right to not like something, but when you go into someone else's Place, and grab there pussy they love so much and then grab there pussy right in front of them!!, and then beat it up real bad, he must be a real bad man!!!!!!

Answer: Sexual-explicit


Question: Comment: I don't disagree at all.  I've been quite "vocal" on here (what's the equivalent term when you're writing?) a number of times when I've seen stories about what appear to be unnecessary cop killings.  It's happened several times over the past few years here in Colorado.  I agree that the blacks have a legitimate complaint about what you call "overreach."  But they have a bigger problem in their own communities, and throwing money at it with "donations" isn't going to solve that problem.  The culture needs changing to MLK's goal: content of character.

What they're up against is a welfare system that incentivizes the breakup of families, and breaking the law to get unreported income.  It's logical under this system to not have character; it pays better.

Answer:
Non-sexual-explicit