We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Q: Sent1: One way that would make me happy with the death penalty is if the person was killed in the same way as the person that they murdered.
 Sent2: I do not think that a government should be unable to kill someone, simply that they almost always should not.

A: Not similar
****
Q: Sent1: If a person is deterred from commiting a crime it is because fear in that person's mind has prevented him from commiting the crime.
 Sent2: If these bleak prospects aren't enough to deter someone from committing a serious crime, what will ramping it up to the death penalty do?

A: Not similar
****
Q: Sent1: No one asks a murderer if killing a person for wearing pink feels like killing a person that has killed another... It may be equally as justified.
 Sent2: Once the danger is gone killing a person is simply murder.

A:
Not similar
****