In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

Ex Input:
Sentence: Joe has sold his house and bought a new one a few miles away. He will be moving into it on Thursday.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the new house because Joe will move to his new house. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

Ex Output:
Correct


Ex Input:
Sentence: Paul tried to call George on the phone, but he wasn't successful.
 Reason: The 'he' refers to paul because at the time of the incident, Paul had not yet met the teenager he was accused of raping. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

Ex Output:
Wrong


Ex Input:
Sentence: Frank was upset with Tom because the toaster he had sold him didn't work.
 Reason: The 'he' refers to tom because the person that bought it is more likely to be upset if it's broken. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

Ex Output:

Wrong