We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Example Input: Sent1: We shouldn't just kill someone if they commit a crime.
 Sent2: So, when someone gets the death penalty, they chose their own fate by committing the crime.
Example Output: Not similar

Example Input: Sent1: I believe that people who have killed, raped, tortured, or have done any other extreme act of violence should get the death penalty.
 Sent2: I assume in what follows that we, the country or the state, execute only for the crime of murder, though many capital punishment adherents would use it for other crimes, such as child rape, treason, arson, robbery and even fraud.
Example Output: Not similar

Example Input: Sent1: The moral law, speaking through my conscience has no problem with the death penalty.
 Sent2: My conscience says that it the death penalty is immoral.
Example Output:
Similar