In this task, you're given a statement, and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence clearly disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3' corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.

Example Input: Statement: It is time to revisit and update the Clean Air Act once again in order to achieve the additional reductions needed to address public health and environmental problems in the most cost effective manner. Choices:  1. The Clean Air Act does not require any updates at this time. 2. The Clean Air Act does not currently address environmental problems in the most optimal way. 3. The Clean Air Act would be improved by reducing carbon emission limits on motorcycles.
Example Output: 1

Example Input: Statement: They incorporate information management as an intrinsic part of their business planning and decision making processes, discussing the benefits and risks associated with specific strategies for improving service, reducing cycle time, or reducing costs. Choices:  1. Making service better isn't an issue that is discussed during the decision making process. 2. The data that goes into information management needs to be thorough or else management can't use it. 3. The risks associated with particular cost reduction plans are included in the process of information management.
Example Output: 1

Example Input: Statement: I am saying and making it plain: If you make a steady practice of trading punches with a trooper or with any one else because you take a dislike to his face, the way his ears stick out, how he walks or talks, or what color coat he wore in the war, then you can roll your beds and ride out the sooner the better. Choices:  1. If you fight people for no good reason you can't stay here. 2. It's okay if you fight a lot, you can still stay here. 3. You won't be welcome anywhere if you fight people for no good reason.
Example Output:
2