We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Input: Consider Input: Sent1: The death penalty has not been shown to be more effective than life imprisonment in deterring murder, hence we should choose life imprisonment.
 Sent2: But the statistics don't support the idea that the death penalty is any more effective as a detterent than is a life sentence.

Output: Similar


Input: Consider Input: Sent1: Only .06% of people who have killed kill again when they escape, are released, etc.
 Sent2: If it must be, then we shall find a way to improve these peoples habits, not kill them because they aren't 'like us'.

Output: Not similar


Input: Consider Input: Sent1: I am a case by case pro, Some people simply need to be put to death for the crimes they have commited so that others are protected.
 Sent2: I mean that if the death penalty would be legalized, people will scare to commit the crime.


Output: Not similar