In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

Example Input: Sentence: I put the heavy book on the table and it broke.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the table because Book to heavy for the table. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Example Output: Correct

Example Input: Sentence: Dr. Adams informed Kate that she had cancer and presented several options for future treatment.
 Reason: The 'she' refers to kate because If Kate was the one retiring, she would not need to be informed. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Example Output: Wrong

Example Input: Sentence: I took the water bottle out of the backpack so that it would be handy.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the water bottle because lighter is more likely to the backpack. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Example Output:
Wrong