We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Sent1: A law-abiding gun nut who uses their gun in committing a crime, is a criminal, and not law-abiding.
 Sent2: In England, where currently the private ownership of hand guns by the law abiding is absolutely prohibited, crimes involving the use of guns are rapidly increasing: only the criminals have access to them.
Not similar

Sent1: Also: More people are killed in car accidents than are killed by guns.
 Sent2: people who want to kill, will kill if you ban guns, they will kill with knives, or something else.
Not similar

Sent1: I haven't seen anyone explain how another gun control law will fight crime, how it'll make anyone safer, how it'll put criminals away longer, etc.
 Sent2: While their by no means should be an outlaw of guns, I do believe restrictions should be put in place.

Not similar