In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

[Q]: Comment: "The big bad alpha male made me wet my panties"
[A]: Sexual-explicit


[Q]: Comment: You know nothing about vegans or vegetarians, then you go and lump them into the SAME category as "food fetishists"!  Like those young men in the Book of Daniel, yes?
[A]: Non-sexual-explicit


[Q]: Comment: I concur it is solely about money $$$ and not about the Protection of Hawaiian homesteaders when it comes to the SCHHA.  They, the SCHHA and their leaders, knowingly compromise kupunas landline service numerous times through their own negligence...and nothing to do with Sandwich Isle equipment and service.  Kupunas couldn't call 911 for emergencies because of SCHHA leaders self-righteous behavior.  SCHHA only temporarily 'care' about Hawaiians when they are trying to protect and advance their personal $$$ agenda.  Otherwise SCHHA normally neglect and ignore keikis kupunas and all Hawaiians outside of their 50 member SCHAA hui.  They latch on to other organization's accomplishments (i e. Waianae Comprehensive Health Center, etc.) saying its the SCHHA, while ignoring other community members contributions (non-SCHHA members).  This reminds me of a parasite...which sustains its life from latching on to a host and sucking life from its host.  Google parasite.
[A]:
Non-sexual-explicit