We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

It is asserted, therefore, that the D.C. gun control laws irrationally prevent only law abiding citizens from owning handguns.
Valid

However, the people of Washington, D.C. should me made aware that their right to keep and bear arms does not come from the Federal government, the Constitution or their local government.
Valid

....that some imaginative authors created fantasy stories wherein guns were unnecessary for the champions to win?

Valid