Given a document, an entity and its sentiment towards the entity, verify if it is the correct sentiment towards the entity. Answer should be yes or no. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

[Q]: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Pope Francis Letter is Negative . Well  it’s now happened.  The great scandal of the modern Catholic Church  —  its  tolerance for clergy who abuse children  and  its  laxity when dealing with bishops who themselves tolerated or enabled priest-abusers — now touches directly on  the pope himself .
 It ’s worth laying out the timeline clearly. In 2015  Pope Francis appointed Juan Barros Madrid to the bishopric of Osorno  Chile. The appointment was met with local protests  among Catholics and non-Catholics who believed that Barros was implicated in the crimes of child sexual abuse committed by his friend Father Fernando Karadima  a prominent Chilean churchman who habitually kissed and fondled boys. In the days after the installation of Barros at Osono  Pope Francis told an archbishop that there was “no objective reason at all” to oppose the appointment. The Vatican’s own department governing these matters  the Congregation for Bishops  released a statement saying they had “carefully examined the prelate’s candidature and did not find objective reasons to preclude the appointment.”
In the months following the appointment   Pope Francis  became extremely dismissive of complaints. “Osorno suffers  yes  for silliness ”  the pope  said of the outrage in the media. “Think with your head  and do not be carried away by the noses of the leftists  who are the ones who put this thing together ” he added.
A few weeks ago   Pope Francis ’s visit to Chile was marked by protests  and  the pope  continued  his  extremely brusque dismissal. “The day I see proof against Bishop Barros  then I will talk ” the pontiff said. “There is not a single piece of evidence against  him . It is all slander. Is that clear?”  Francis  said that no victims had come forward to  him . It was apparently this statement that caused Cardinal Sean O’Malley of Boston to scramble down to Chile and meet with the pope. After O’Malley’s intervention  presumably  the pope issued a half-apology  but repeated that the accusations against Barros were “slander” before adding  “I’m convinced he’s innocent.”
And now the news drops. In the time between the pope’s appointment of Barros and his commentary about protesters being carried away by leftists  members of the Vatican’s own Commission for the Protection of Minors gathered to discuss the appointment. They had a representative hand-deliver a letter to Pope Francis  from Carlos Cruz. The letter alleged  in lurid detail  that Barros had personally witnessed the abuse of Cruz at Karadima’s hands. Members of the commission photographed the hand-off of the letter to  the pope   to reassure Cruz that they were doing everything possible to make his cry for justice heard.
The facts as we know them leave us with a few interpretations. 1)  Pope Francis  simply never read the letter  ignoring this extraordinary intervention by the Vatican’s own commission on a matter of public controversy for  his  pontificate. 2)  Francis  read the letter but forgot about it  reverting to  his  original understanding of the case. 3)  Francis  read the letter  but stuck to  his  decision for Barros  committing unintentional or intentional deceptions about the state of  his  knowledge of the accusations. 4)  He  read the letter  but either doubted the accusations in it  or at least found them so unimpressive that  he  did not decide to follow up on them.
The first explanation would mean that  Francis  was culpably ignorant. The second that  he  may lack the mental or moral faculties to competently govern the Catholic Church. The third that  he  is too stubborn or vain to change course in the face of evidence. And the last that  he  has little trust or faith in the Commission on the Protection of Minors to pass on credible counsel to  him . Perhaps more reporting or disclosure will change our understanding  but none of these are satisfactory.
[A]: no


[Q]: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity David Johnson is Positive . A Twitter user posted what appears to be a screengrab and wrote that an ISIS affiliate group broadcast a video showing the October attack that killed Sgt. La David Johnson and three other U.S. Green Berets.
Sgt.  Johnson  and three other American soldiers were killed in an ambush in Niger on Oct. 4. (Joe Raedle/Getty Images)
 Johnson   25  was part of a 12-member Army special forces unit accompanying 30 Nigerien forces when they were attacked in a densely wooded area by as many as 50 militants.
 Johnson 's widow Myeshia Johnson is presented with a folded U.S. flag by a military honor guard member during the burial service at the Memorial Gardens East cemetery. (GASTON DE CARDENAS/AFP/Getty Images)
Remains of Sgt. La David Johnson found weeks after his funeral
The gap in time led to questions about whether  Johnson  was killed in the assault and not found  or if  he  was taken away by the enemy.
According to the officials  a medical examination concluded that  Johnson  was shot as many as 18 times.
It is believed  he  died in the attack and there were no indications  he  was shot at close range  or had been bound or taken prisoner  as several media reports have suggested.
[A]: yes


[Q]: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Seth Meyers is Positive . Image copyright Reuters Image caption  Seth Meyers  is a US comedian  political commentator and TV presenter
This year  however  it was  US comedian's Seth Meyers'  turn to take the reins (although  he  did enlist the help of a few of the stars to deliver some of  his  punch lines).
Here are  Seth Meyers'  best jokes from  his  opening monologue:
Watch Seth Meyers' opening monologue:
[A]:
no