Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.

Input: Consider Input: Governing today is first and foremost about politics, elections simply decide who is governing. Effective government is what happens when your party of choice is in power. Underlying it all is the shadow government( the "Deep State" ) that doesn't particularly care which party is in power.  There's zero incentive for self-policing when you own the game.

Output: Yes


Input: Consider Input: Political Correctness has ceased to have any altruism and has now run so far off the tracks that we  literally can't use certain words for fear that some obvious "Cunt" will spend time... not time protesting the actual act of colonialism but the literal use of the word colonialism.

What a fucking joke liberalism has become that these people who own and built a business, working hard to make a real tangible thing, exist in a world where "words" from "Cunts" can  actually destroy it all! 

Count me in for dinner tonight!

Output: Yes


Input: Consider Input: The three former judges are mediators. Caldwell's latest appointee, now awaiting Council confirmation, Peter Adler is also a mediator. The Commission needs diversity, both in professional background and age. The commissioners, including designee Adler, are in their 60s and 70s.  That appointment should be held in Council until after the August primary election. If Caldwell loses, his successor should make the appointment. Although this would leave the commission short a member for many more months, there are many commission vacancies the mayor has not filled. The key message in this article is that the mayor wants to destroy the Ethics Commission. The voters and Council should make sure he doesn't.


Output: No