Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.

[EX Q]: Actually, Obama redefined turn backs at the border as deportations, thus vastly inflating his deportation numbers, so no one really knows what the correct comparison is. But essentially, no president has taken on this problem. Trump will be the first if he gets elected, and he will only need to use existing law to do it. But funding it will be the trick. If he finds a way to do that, and he might, he will have solved a problem no other president has been able to. But he has to get elected first, not an easy thing when running against a person powerful enough to keep from being indicted for obvious felonies that even the Director of the CIA, a former celebrated general, could not avoid for much lesser violations.
[EX A]: No

[EX Q]: You people are all insane! Your comments are disgusting. I hate this state, bunch of disgusting immoral freaks.
RIP woman RIP.
[EX A]: Yes

[EX Q]: Obomba, don't care what others think, remove it. The LGB (minus the Q who are now not part of the click) don't want to to go into other genders locker rooms. The LGB use locker rooms based on science. The T are trying suck them into this mental disorder and they should fight getting sucked in not join in. The libs try and call this a "Bathroom" issue, no it is more a locker room issue and but the media won't mention young ladies being exposed to things they should not be or scared their safety is being imposed on. Instead this numb nut thinks we should all comply or else. My opinion that will be purged is that Augie Smith should take a bath with a toaster.
[EX A]:
Yes