In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine the neutral choice based on your inference from the statement and your commonsense knowledge. The neutral choice is a sentence that neither agrees nor disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3', corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence. If sentence X agrees with sentence Y, one's correctness follows from the other one. If sentence X disagrees with sentence Y, they can not be correct at the same time.

[Q]: Statement: In the case of H-2A workers, the reading would require the conclusion that Congress intended to provide H-2A workers with legal services representation on claims arising from their employment contracts only for the very brief periods that the workers are in the United States -- potentially rendering the promise of legal representation largely meaningless. Choices: 1. This reading would require the conclusion that Congress had intended for H-2A workers to only get legal representation when they were in the country. 2. This reading would require the conclusion that Congress had intended for H-2A workers to only get legal representation when they were outside of the country. 3. From a legal standpoint, most judges and legal scholars would agree that this is asking for chaos.
[A]: 3


[Q]: Statement: Should have remembered it if it was." Choices: 1. If he had left the stove on at home he is sure he would have remembered. 2. If it was he should have remembered it. 3. He was glad that he had forgotten that particular detail.
[A]: 1


[Q]: Statement: i know now  come on Choices: 1. I don't know what's going on. 2. I know. 3. Ii know that is ridiculous.
[A]:
3