In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

[EX Q]: Comment: Did the person who gave you the tip demand to be called "deepthroat"?
[EX A]: Sexual-explicit

[EX Q]: Comment: 40,000 Boy Scouts creaming their head off, cheering for a pussy grabbing liar. And you're his biggest supporter on here.
[EX A]: Sexual-explicit

[EX Q]: Comment: The sanctimonious crowd in Toronto is getting worse all the time. Interesting how the article invokes Orwell---1984 was commentary on Marxist totalitarianism and doublespeak is certainly apt for Toronto. 
Can any regular salary afford a home there anymore?
Is multiculturalism such a blessing?
Are feminism and women's rights actually a perennial fight we need to wage?
Is the place of the traditional family--the foundation stone for all societies---in good shape?
Are any of their sacred cows even remotely true?
She writes, " the most grossly obvious facts can be ignored when they are unwelcome … The most intelligent people seem capable of holding schizophrenic beliefs, or disregarding plain facts, of evading serious questions with debating-society repartees, or swallowing baseless rumours and of looking on indifferently while history is falsified."
That's just how I feel about Toronto society.
[EX A]:
Non-sexual-explicit