We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gay Marriage) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gay marriage. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gay marriage.

Input: Consider Input: As for the life expectancy ones a lot of the behaviors are hardly limited to homosexuality and their inclusion makes me wonder about the validity of that survey too as well as the huge gap.

Output: Invalid


Input: Consider Input: POTS and kettles dude since this is my thread and the topic of aids has nothing to do with why people think that they have the right to vote on my marriage.

Output: Valid


Input: Consider Input: We give Christians exactly the same rights as Buddhists in every situation, yet you have no trouble distinguishing between the two.


Output: Invalid