Evaluate the similarity between them and classify them into classes from 0-5 as follows:
0 : The two sentences are completely dissimilar.
1 : The two sentences are not equivalent, but are on the same topic.
2 : The two sentences are not equivalent, but share some details.
3 : The two sentences are roughly equivalent, but some important information differs/missing.
4 : The two sentences are mostly equivalent, but some unimportant details differ.
5 : The two sentences are completely equivalent, as they mean the same thing.

[Q]: Sentence 1: A three-judge panel of the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled late Friday that the small size, limited use and secular purpose make the image legitimate. Sentence 2: A three-judge panel of the 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in St. Louis overturned a ruling issued last year that supported the ordinance.
[A]: 3


[Q]: Sentence 1: A dog emerges form the water with a stick in its mouth. Sentence 2: A dog runs toward the camera with a stick in its mouth.
[A]: 2


[Q]: Sentence 1: there were no weapons. Sentence 2: Of course there were no weapons.
[A]:
5