We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

If there was no such law for guns, carriers would be in the same boat as black people walking past a "No Negroes" sign.
Valid

Being at a designated presidential speech zone, and armed and hour before the president shows up, simply doesn't count.
Valid

And as far as carrying in public, as long as I have commited no crime, then why should anyone need know I have my gun.

Valid