In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

Ex Input:
Sentence: Jim signaled the barman and gestured toward his empty glass
 Reason: The 'his' refers to jim because Jim wanted the barman's bathroom key.  The pronoun refers to the barman. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

Ex Output:
Wrong


Ex Input:
Sentence: Joe paid the detective after he received the final report on the case.
 Reason: The 'he' refers to joe because THE DETECTIVE REFER TO JOE. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

Ex Output:
Wrong


Ex Input:
Sentence: Bob paid for Charlie's college education, but now Charlie acts as though it never happened. He is very ungrateful.
 Reason: The 'He' refers to charlie because Charlie is the one who acts like it never happened. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

Ex Output:

Correct