We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

[EX Q]: Sent1: The person who said that the death penalty should be used for people who are convicted of multiple-burglaries sounds like a complete knucklehead.
 Sent2: When someone mentions a criminal deterrence factor with death sentences, it sounds like a bad joke or total ignorance.
[EX A]: Not similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: I think people suffer more when they spend their whole lives in jail.
 Sent2: I dont believe that someone who killed or raped a lot of people should be able to live even if they are in a jail surrounded by other criminals.
[EX A]: Not similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: So, the only reason I can really see why people support the death penalty is to have simple vengeance against the perpretrator.
 Sent2: The death penalty right now is to easy even I think.
[EX A]:
Not similar