In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Q: Comment: If the Broncos do not give Sloter a chance by having him on their roster and letting him develop then some other team will. NFL scouts are not stupid! He has the highest Wonderlic score from the Combine and is an ideal size for a quarterback. He has a stong arm and throws with accuracy while always looking downfield.  He also has an innate ability to move in the pocket and rarely looks rattled.But, hey, let's bring in some bum and cut this kid and then hope he is around for the practice squad. If he goes to  another team, I hope he comes back to Denver, sometime in the future, and beats their ass!

A: Sexual-explicit
****
Q: Comment: I'm sorry, but you can't truly know someone based on the limited interaction you have delivering the mail. Hell, I'm on a first name basis with our mail delivery guy who I see nearly every weekday, and we have always exchanged friendly pleasantries. He'd probably say I am a kind spirited guy too. Ask my friends though, and they'll tell ya the truth. I'm kind of a dick.

A: Sexual-explicit
****
Q: Comment: Absolutely OK. To repeat myself, I think at least $1,000 max as a deterrent is appropriate.  As it is now violators don't think twice about risking violating the ordinance. Leave it to the court's discretion what is the right amount by judging mitigating circumstances (ignorance, remorse, or other extenuating facts). I'm not at all backing away from my original comment and these two replies to yours, despite what I think about about them. Now, you're introducing a straw man issue as a red herring to try to bolster your untenable opinion - smoking in the park. Compliance with the law, whether we agree with them or not, is hopefully not based on economic circumstance. The punishment/penalty phase (court) is an opportunity to consider such. Plus, the cop doesn't have to issue the citation anyways if he/she feels it's inappropriate. I really don't understand your problem or where you're coming from. Would you be placated if I said "up to"? That being said, I'm done replying to you.

A:
Non-sexual-explicit
****