In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

[Q]: Comment: And, finally:
.
"We'd be in uncharted territory, that is unarguable."
.
What nonsense.
.
The vast majority of democracies world-wide use PR.  Are you really suggesting Canadians are too dumb to figure it out?
.
Or are you merely suggesting that it only works in countries where the populations once worshipped Odin, Thor, and Freya?
.
Bring on Bugs Bunny, Elmer Fudd, and the Wagnerian opera ...
[A]: Non-obscene


[Q]: Comment: Yes, it the old French and Latin, well before it was recognized as the name of a Sacrement, which also was not recognized until 1000 years ago. Entymology does not change the fact of relationship for those in marriage nor make the bishop any less a petty fool for his advice to his priests. He's still nursing a bad case of sour grapes.
[A]: Non-obscene


[Q]: Comment: What bunch of gobbledygook. I cannot believe a learned man can be this crazy. It is a real eye opener.
[A]:
Non-obscene