In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: toxic and non-toxic. Toxicity is defiend as anything that is rude, disrespectful, or unreasonable that would make someone want to leave a converation.

Example Input: Comment: Gibberish.
Example Output: Non-toxic

Example Input: Comment: For over a decade, the Metro Vancouver region- and the province of BC as a whole- have needed the provincial govt to demonstrate bold, ambitious leadership by setting out a concise, multi-year policy and spending roadmap for the South of Fraser area...

... that is intended to bring this area up to (44 sq. miles) city of Vancouver public transportation, road, bridge and tunnel standards-

.... and in particular, to provide (246 sq. miles) Surrey and Langley with a legitimate** rapid transit rail network... One that will impress domestic and international onlookers- and potential investors- instead of making them yawn... 

** "Legitimate" rapid transit meaning rail lines that use: separated-from-roadway (IE: elevated); and computer-driven (automated) technologies (similar to the city of Vancouver's Expo, Millennium and Canada Lines),  and not the 19th-century technology "buses on rails" (that have been run along already busy roadways) LRT that Translink's Mayors Council are proposing...
Example Output: Non-toxic

Example Input: Comment: According to CNN's exit polls, Trump won white college graduates as whole, winning white male college graduates 54/39, but losing white female college graduates 45/51. You might want to revise your narrative.
Example Output:
Non-toxic