We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Input: Consider Input: The death penalty doesn't need to become more equalized.

Output: Valid


Input: Consider Input: Wrong again, there have been many, many, many more cases that that:

Output: Invalid


Input: Consider Input: Courts take the position that, it is not their's to punish, our laws are there to protect individuals or groups, and to rehabilitate perpetrators when possible (not in the case of murder obviously though).


Output: Valid