In this task, you are given a passage which has a question and the context. You have to generate an answer to the question based on the information present in the context.
--------
Question: Context: Alternative splicing is important for increasing the complexity of the human proteome from a limited genome. Previous studies have shown that for some autoantigens, there is differential immunogenicity among alternatively spliced isoforms.', 'Herein, we tested the hypothesis that alternative splicing is a common feature for transcripts of autologous proteins that are autoantigens. The corollary hypothesis tested was that nonautoantigen transcripts have a lower frequency of alternative splicing.', 'The extent of alternative splicing within 45 randomly selected self-proteins associated with autoimmune diseases was compared with 9554 randomly selected proteins in the human genome by using bioinformatics analyses. Isoform-specific regions that resulted from alternative splicing were studied for their potential to be epitopes for antibodies or T-cell receptors.', 'Alternative splicing occurred in 100% of the autoantigen transcripts. This was significantly higher than the approximately 42% rate of alternative splicing observed in the 9554 randomly selected human gene transcripts ( P < .001). Within the isoform-specific regions of the autoantigens, 92% and 88% encoded MHC class I and class II-restricted T-cell antigen epitopes, respectively, and 70% encoded antibody binding domains. Furthermore, 80% of the autoantigen transcripts underwent noncanonical alternative splicing, which is also significantly higher than the less than 1% rate in randomly selected gene transcripts ( P < .001).\Question: Does increased noncanonical splicing of autoantigen transcripts provide the structural basis for expression of untolerized epitopes?

Answer: These studies suggest that noncanonical alternative splicing may be an important mechanism for the generation of untolerized epitopes that may lead to autoimmunity. Furthermore, the product of a transcript that does not undergo alternative splicing is unlikely to be a target antigen in autoimmunity.


Question: Context: Comorbidity is prevalent among patients with Ischemic Heart Disease (IHD) and may influence patients' subjective and objective domains of well-being.", 'We aimed to investigate the associations between comorbidity and different measures of well-being (i.e. health related quality of life, psychological distress, sleep quality, and dyadic adjustment) among patients with IHD.', 'In this cross-sectional study, 796 outpatients with documented IHD were enrolled from an outpatient cardiology clinic in 2006. Comorbidity (Ifudu index), quality of life (SF36), psychological distress (Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale; HADS), sleep quality (Pittsburg Sleep Quality Index; PSQI), and dyadic adjustment quality (Revised Dyadic Adjustment Scale; RDAS) were measured. Associations between comorbidity and different measures of well-being were determined.', 'Significant correlations were found between comorbidity score and all measures of well-being. Comorbidity score was correlated with physical quality of life (r = -0.471, P < 0.001), mental quality of life (r = -0.447, P < 0.001), psychological distress (r = 0.344, P < 0.001), sleep quality (r = 0.358, P < 0.001), and dyadic adjustment (r = -0.201, P < 0.001).\Question: Does comorbidity influence multiple aspects of well-being of patients with ischemic heart disease?

Answer: This study showed a consistent pattern of associations between somatic comorbidities and multiple aspects of well-being among patients with IHD. Findings may increase cardiologists' interest to identify and treat somatic conditions among IHD patients.


Question: Context: Accurate sampling of gallbladder bile for biliary analysis is essential for determining any potential difference between combined bile acid therapy and monotherapy in gallstone patients.', 'In 104 gallstone patients undergoing extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy with following bile acid therapy [either chenodeoxycholic acid (500 mg/day) and ursodeoxycholic acid (500 mg/day), group I (n = 53), or ursodeoxycholic acid alone (1000 mg/day), group II (n = 51)], bile samples, obtained by direct fine needle puncture of the gallbladder, were investigated for biliary lipids, total biliary protein concentration, and nucleation time before and after 12 months of bile acid therapy.', 'Initially, a negative correlation was found between nucleation time and number of gallstones and between total biliary protein concentration and nucleation time (r = -0.52 and r = -0.49 in group I vs r = -0.56 and r = -0.51 in group II, p < 0.01 in each group). The correlation between total biliary protein concentration and nucleation time was also found after 12 months of bile acid treatment (r = -0.54 in group I vs r = -0.47 in group II, p < 0.01 in each group). In group I, the decrease in cholesterol saturation index, biliary cholesterol, cholic acid, deoxycholic acid, and total protein concentration was more pronounced than in group II (p < 0.01). The same effect was found concerning the prolongation of nucleation time (p < 0.01). Furthermore, dissolution rates were higher in group I compared with group II (80.4 vs 69.0%, p < 0.01).\Question: Is combined bile acid therapy more effective on biliary lipids and dissolution rates than monotherapy after gallstone lithotripsy?

Answer:
In gallstone patients, combined therapy with urso- and chenodeoxycholic acid is superior to either ursodeoxycholic acid alone or biliary parameters in bile samples obtained by direct fine needle puncture of the gallbladder.