We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Ex Input:
Sent1: It's quite obvious by this and as well as the SCOTUS decision that the right to keep and bear arms is not dependent on the militia part, but the other way around.
 Sent2: 2) ensure that the right to keep and bear arms for a militia is not infringed.

Ex Output:
Not similar


Ex Input:
Sent1: We don't have to choose between total regulation of guns or total denial of the problem of gun crime.
 Sent2: We have guns and we still have crime and lots of gun deaths.

Ex Output:
Not similar


Ex Input:
Sent1: So if you want to ban guns, 1,531,764 people will get killed or injured, and you'll only take guns out of the hands of those who don't even commit gun crimes.
 Sent2: So... you feel that the sale of a type of gun could not have been banned if people didn't need permits in the first place?

Ex Output:

Not similar