In this task, you're given a pair of sentences, sentence 1 and sentence 2. Your job is to determine if the two sentences clearly agree/disagree with each other, or if this can't be determined. Indicate your answer as yes or no respectively.

Input: Consider Input: Sentence 1: Like Jon, his head was bare. Sentence 2: His head had nothing on it.

Output: yes


Input: Consider Input: Sentence 1: The farther south you go, the fewer provisions you'll find for water-related activities. Sentence 2: There are fewer provisions for water activities as you go south.

Output: yes


Input: Consider Input: Sentence 1: and uh in each case it was a retrial and the sentencing was the same each time which happened in the state of Florida happened to be uh death but in terms of i well the question also was in terms of mandatory sentencing or mandatory sentences for uh certain crimes i think depending on uh in certain crimes i think that they should be mandatory for example uh armed robbery uh if we have convicted i think uh plea bargaining should should be uh a thing of the past um certain types of uh you know homicides Sentence 2: Plea bargaining should be an allowed and common part of resolving murder.


Output: yes