Categorize the comment on the basis of severe toxicity. If the comment is severely toxic output Yes, otherwise output No.

Q: There's blame enough to go around regarding obstructionism. I'm sick of the finger - pointing and the "two wrongs make a right" rationalizations. If our founding fathers had acted like the principals of our major parties we'd never have had the powerful synthesis that made our country's constitution. It's time to stop making excuses. What ever happened to personal responsibility?

A: No
****
Q: You all are pedo loving pussys i know this comment will get rejected like my last but thats okay you still see it when you say it isnt civil. SHOOT ALL THE PEDOS AND NIGGERS!

A: Yes
****
Q: I agree with you. The writer turned this into 'oh those rich' topic.
It's definitely a very slanted piece making him look bad.
I don't think the writer needed to mention his charities anymore than mentioning his life story,and his family's story.
What's that have to do with who should have the rights to the child.
To me, that's all that should've been dealt with. The issue of custody. The rest was just wasting space, and giving it a slant against Schnitzer.
And I don't know these people at all, so I'm saying this with little knowledge of who they are.

A:
No
****