Given a document, an entity and its sentiment towards the entity, verify if it is the correct sentiment towards the entity. Answer should be yes or no. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Richard Sherman is Neutral . Richard Sherman  is not a fan of the NFL's injury reports.
Speaking with reporters on Wednesday   Sherman  who has been listed as questionable the past two weeks despite not missing a defensive snap for the Seahawks   said that the injury reports existed more for the people betting on the games than anyone else.
"I guess from what I understand the rule is for the gamblers  for Vegas  to make sure the odds and everything are what they are supposed to be  which is apparently what the league is concerned about when talking about injuries and things like that "  Sherman  said. "So maybe somebody should look into that  because I thought we weren't a gambling league and we were against all those things. But our injury report is specifically to make sure the gamblers get their odds right."
In response to  Sherman 's comments  the NFL put out a statement seemingly confirming  Sherman 's beliefs. However  the league counters the claim that they are for gambling  and instead suggesting that they are to protect the league from gambling.
 Sherman  added that  it  wasn't just people betting on games in Las Vegas that were beneficiaries of the NFL's injury reports. "Fantasy football  oh my God  " Sherman  said. "They are almost as bad as the gamblers."
While he was lighthearted by the end of the presser  it's striking to see a player call out the league for a policy as plainly as  Sherman  did in this case. You can watch  Sherman 's comments below.
The Seahawks head to Nashville on Sunday to take on the Tennessee Titans. Having not missed a game since 2011  fans can expect  Sherman  to play  regardless of what the injury report says on Sunday.
yes

Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Steve Bannon is Neutral . The attempts to curtail testimony to congressional investigators became clear this week when  former White House chief strategist Steve Bannon  appeared before the House Intelligence Committee and infuriated both sides of the aisle by refusing to answer questions about  his  work during the presidential transition and in the White House.
At some points during  Bannon 's six hours of closed-door testimony   his  attorney took breaks to confer via telephone with the White House counsel's office to clarify what questions could be answered and came back with the same guidance:  Bannon  could not discuss any activities related to the transition or  his  tenure in the White House.
 Bannon 's team negotiated ground rules with the White House counsel's office the week prior to his appearance before the House Intelligence Committee  according to a source familiar with the situation.
The President's personal legal team was aware of discussions between the White House counsel's office and  Bannon 's lawyer about protecting a possible privilege claim. But it wasn't their decision  according to a person familiar with the discussions. The protection of the privilege is a matter for the White House  not the President's legal team  because it relates to the office.
Before the hearing   Bannon 's lawyer informed a staff member of Rep. Devin Nunes  the California Republican who chairs the House Intelligence Committee  that  Bannon  planned to claim executive privilege on topics beyond the presidential campaign  a source said.
But that information was apparently tightly held. "It caught me personally by surprise" that  Bannon  asserted executive privilege  said Rep. Mike Conaway  the Texas Republican leading the committee's Russia investigation.
South Carolina Rep. Trey Gowdy and Florida Rep. Tom Rooney  the other two Republicans leading the Russia probe along with Conaway  also said they weren't aware of any agreement between the White House and committee staff about the scope of  Bannon 's testimony.
"They wouldn't do that because I'd ask what I think is relevant to ask  and if you've got a legal privilege you can assert it " Gowdy said  adding that  Bannon  was in a "legally indefensible position."
As it became clear on Tuesday that  Bannon  was refusing to answer questions  the committee served  him  with a subpoena to compel  him  to divulge additional information.
But the scope of what  Bannon  was claiming was privileged shocked members from both parties.
" His  version of executive privilege is it covers the transition  the time  he  was at the White House and covers time forever " Gowdy told Fox News Wednesday. "That is no one's definition of executive privilege."
Lawmakers were also offended that  Bannon  had already divulged details about some of  his  post-campaign activities in Michael Wolff's explosive book "Fire and Fury " but then refused to discuss those events with the committee.  Bannon 's attorney also informed members that he would  in fact  answer those questions when he meets with special counsel Robert Mueller's team because executive privilege doesn't apply to Mueller's investigation.
Democrats charge that  Bannon 's appearance before the House committee marks the broadest attempt so far at using privilege to shield events that occurred from the moment Trump was elected.
Republicans haven't ruled out the possibility of holding  Bannon  in contempt  but at least one GOP member -- Gowdy -- suggested it was unlikely.
House Speaker Paul Ryan downplayed the issue of whether witnesses like  Bannon  might be abusing the bounds of executive privilege.
Still   Bannon 's stonewalling sparked a sharp warning from Conaway -- the Republican leading the House Russia probe -- to White House aides who might follow the Bannon model: "We're going to insist on getting questions we need to answer our report."
yes

Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Roy Moore is Neutral . House Freedom Caucus chairman  Rep. Mark Meadows (R-NC)  joined Breitbart News Sunday live from Alabama to discuss  his  support of  former Alabama Chief Justice Roy Moore for U.S. Senate .
Breitbart London editor Raheem Kassam and Washington Political editor Matt Boyle joined Congressman Meadows for an extended chat on  Moore ’s Tuesday special primary election showdown with the Chamber of Commerce-endorsed appointed Sen. Luther Strange.
“I know  Judge Roy Moore  to be not only be a man of character in spite of the tens of millions of dollars that are flowing into Alabama to suggest otherwise ” Meadows said  laying out the case for his chosen candidate.
Moore  on the other hand  is  in Meadows opinion  the kind of candidate who will not bend to “the Swamp.” He told Kassam and Boyle  “A Judge Moore win really would make sure that the Trump agenda gets implemented ” adding  “There’s all kinds of members of Congress and senators who will run  and they really run so incredibly strong like they have a backbone of steel  but they really have a backbone of a banana. You know  when it’s peeled back  it gets real mushy when they get to Washington  DC. So we need to give them some steel.  Judge Roy Moore  has a backbone of steel. I’m glad to not only endorse  him  and support  him   but I look forward to serving with  him  in the coming days.”
Meadows also laid out  his  case against Luther Strange  whom President Trump has chosen to endorse.  He  focused  for example  on Strange’s back-and-forth record on eliminating the filibuster for legislation in the Senate  telling Boyle  “Luther Strange has done the infamous flip-flop. I can tell you I was never so mad to see that  he  signed onto a letter that says we ought to keep the 60 vote filibuster rule in place  that says you gotta have 60 votes in order to move anything in the Senate. That one thing has thwarted the Trump agenda over and over and over again in this first nine months. And yet   he  signed onto a letter that said we need to keep it. Well  it was only when  he  got in a real tough race in this special election did  he  say  just a few weeks ago  ‘Oh  no. I’m for doing away with the filibuster.’ The American people are smarter than that. I know the people in Alabama are smarter than that. They see it for what it is: a political stunt that  he  pulled at the last minute in hopes of trying to convince people that  he  is one of them.”
Meadows closed  his  appearance by offering  his  prediction.  “Roy Moore  is a man of faith. The power of prayer for so many is going up on  his  behalf right now. I think Tuesday night will be a great victory  due in no small part to the wonderful efforts of all the listeners ”  he  said before signing off.

no