In this task, you're given two sentences. Indicate if the first sentence clearly entails the second sentence (i.e., one can conclude the 2nd sentence by reading the 1st one). Indicate your answer with '1' if the first sentence entails the second sentence, otherwise answer with '0'.

[EX Q]: Sentence 1: A matching fingerprint was discovered on the strap. Sentence 2: A matching fingerprint was excavated from the strap.
[EX A]: 0

[EX Q]: Sentence 1: In late 2006, Aneta Krawczyk accused the party's leader Andrzej Lepper of having offered her political favours for sex in 2001, and then said he had been the father of her youngest child. She said the same of Lepper's close collaborator and MP, Stanislaw Lyzwinski, and accused him of rape and sexual abuse. She also said that Popecki, who had been Lyzwinski's aide, had tried to induce a miscarriage by giving her a labour-inducing drug called oxytocin. Sentence 2: Andrzej Lepper is no longer the Minister of Agriculture and Rural Development.
[EX A]: 0

[EX Q]: Sentence 1: The end result says that 61.6% of the Dutch people vote (against) the European Constitution, while 38.4% voted (for) the Constitution. Sentence 2: The Dutch people approve the European Constitution.
[EX A]:
0