We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

What I don't get is why gay rights groups, neo nazis, white supremacists, pro-abortionists and war protesters all get treated with response and dignity, but groups of gun owners are treated like third class citizens.
Valid

There is no need to go crazy and ban guns, which would probably kill more than it saves, not to mention the infringement on our civil liberties.
Valid

Your attempt to use rates of BJS to prove gun deaths, which have actually gone down despite huge increases of guns, fell flat as it has remained flat or decreased while other weapons were used in 2/3rds of the crimes.

Valid