We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gay Marriage) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gay marriage. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gay marriage.

Now a gay man may not wish to marry a gay woman (or vice versa) but the government does not inherently prohibit marriage between gay persons.
Valid

You read the article over 1000 rights under Federal status are for married people... And even WITH Gay marriage legal in some states under DOMA, the Federal Government does not recognize them as legitimate!
Valid

As I have said many times before I would be alright with marriage being limited to breeding age heteros because it would then exclude heteros also.

Valid