In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

[Q]: Comment: Oh, I agree, but I was commenting on the horrible idea of Sarah Palin as Sec. of the Interior. She'll be out shooting the fricking buffalo!
[A]: Obscene


[Q]: Comment: And, finally:
.
"We'd be in uncharted territory, that is unarguable."
.
What nonsense.
.
The vast majority of democracies world-wide use PR.  Are you really suggesting Canadians are too dumb to figure it out?
.
Or are you merely suggesting that it only works in countries where the populations once worshipped Odin, Thor, and Freya?
.
Bring on Bugs Bunny, Elmer Fudd, and the Wagnerian opera ...
[A]: Non-obscene


[Q]: Comment: Supercilious? No. You are clearly ignorant of the law (a fact made that much more obvious by your failure to respond substantively to any of the numerous flaws I pointed out in your comments.)

As far as my position, it was clearly stated.  

As for your suggestion that enforcement might change now that we have people roaming the streets with weapons purporting to be keeping America "safe" ?  I think that is likely the cleverest thing you have suggested here so far.
[A]:
Non-obscene