In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Example Input: Comment: "Santa Barbara feel." You mean walkable, well kept sidewalks. Livable, nice even. Not the dumping ground for homeless drug addicts and prostitutes that it looks like now. The Ammo Can has enough parking. I never see that lot full. I do see all the snow from that lot pushed in the way of any one on a bike or walking.

People in Anchorage need to get off their butts and walk to a business. Their doctors will be happier, and they will be healthier.
Example Output: Sexual-explicit

Example Input: Comment: How do you shut Drudge down and not shut down all the bigoted, racist, sites he links to like the Washington post, New york times, ext... ;)
Example Output: Non-sexual-explicit

Example Input: Comment: Being right about what? 

Bill is in trouble for sexually harassing women. He just settled a lawsuit about other sexual harassment. 

His political slant is not he issue here. You are conflating two very different issues. 

Bill is right wing and has a right to promote and push his agenda. That is fine.

Bill and other fox execs thought they could groom up and coming talent to be their personal prostitutes and use them for sex. This is not fine.

Why does the right have to try to deflect using such bad technique?
Example Output:
Sexual-explicit