In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

[Q]: Comment: You are so right, Colkoch.  About six months ago, I caught a program that addressed the ACA in solid Trump territory that was primarily a coal-mining economy.  Most of those present spoke of their great fear that Trump was going to take their healthcare away, as many had their insurance through the ACA, seeing that the GOP had never produced a better alternative for replacement plan.  Those coal miners and their families (including their ill parents, or ill children) had often gone uninsured before the ACA.  They still supported Trump, but not on the repeal of Obamacare.  Amazing how afraid they were, justifiably so, and that is became clear to them at just how unjust Trump could be in such vital areas.  This is going to grow as more people face the realities of what this madman has done to them.
[A]: Non-obscene


[Q]: Comment: Pope Francis lets the whole world see who he is and tells the whole world what he thinks. I don't always agree with him, but I think the phrase "holy whore" is more appropriate for those who talk tough behind pseudonyms.
[A]: Obscene


[Q]: Comment: I was hoping this crap was over with last year.  Ugh.
[A]:
Obscene