In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

[Q]: Comment: Astonishing comments on this thread. The C series was a remarkable achievement for a mid sized country like Canada and showed the level of technological expertise in aerospace. Name me any other country in the world apart from the USA that has even come close to this achievement. Airbus is multi country and Embraer is revamping old technology. Why shouldn't Canada play an important role within Airbus?
There will be more jobs in Alabama if the US market opens up but the new company with all its strengths could sell twice as much in the rest of the world where 70% of the market is  bringing more jobs to Canada. If Trump is happy about this deal which considerably strengthens Boeing's only real competitor the he is the fool I always thought he was.
[A]: Non-sexual-explicit


[Q]: Comment: Victor, Thanks for this 'column'!  Of course there is only one problem with this report. It is too short.  There is so much more 'going on out there'. 
But nothing going on in Hawaii other than the "Grapes of Wrath" responses we hear about on the news.  
As Edmund Burke said, "When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall one by one, an unpitied sacrifice in a contemptible struggle."  [In Hawai'i's case, the bad men are those whose covetousness blinds them to the unfairness of zoning and the need for regulating the housing market.
[A]: Non-sexual-explicit


[Q]: Comment: I don't have to imagine the chaos and disunity...the members of the dubia have clearly demonstrated these to us.
[A]:
Non-sexual-explicit