We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Example Input: Sent1: The death penalty is not deterrance for the person executed.
 Sent2: Peterson could face the death penalty or life without parole.
Example Output: Not similar

Example Input: Sent1: Last time I checked, killing doesn't bring persons back to life, so the only reason for the death penalty seems to be revenge.
 Sent2: With all that it has been a very trying time for me and I have had to struggle with how I really felt about the death penalty.
Example Output: Not similar

Example Input: Sent1: BUT it is not apparent that death penalty lower crime rate.
 Sent2: It seems that you're assuming the correlation between crime rate and countries with capital punishment is that the death penalty encourages crime.
Example Output:
Not similar