In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence can be inferred from the statement. Incorrect choices change the meaning in important ways or have details that are not mentioned in the statement. Indicate your answer as 1,2, or 3 corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.

Ex Input:
Statement: Anyone who knew Tony Lukas even slightly was deeply impressed by his boundless, open-minded curiosity about the injustices of modern life, along with his stubborn reportorial integrity about getting to the very bottom of any story as best he could. Choices:  1. Tony Lukas was an elitist.  2. People who knew Tony Lukas were impressed by his curiosity and integrity in the news field.  3. Tony Lukas was open minded, curious and stubborn. 

Ex Output:
2


Ex Input:
Statement: yeah you're fading Choices:  1. Yes, you are clearing up. 2. Yes, you are fading. 3. Yes, you are fading from connection issues.

Ex Output:
2


Ex Input:
Statement: A combination of basic research, program implementation and evaluation studies, and policy and procedure evaluations are needed to resolve the issues outlined previously. Choices:  1. There are issues that need to be resolved. 2. There are no issues that need to be resolved. 3. Many steps will be required to resolve the issues.

Ex Output:

1