The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the uv-part strategy, otherwise output No. uv-part is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to undermine the requirements of the opponent. For instance, suggesting that the opponent would not need more firewood since they already have the basic supplies or a suggestion that there might be a store near the campsite where the opponent can get the supplies instead.
--------
Question: Context: 'That makes total sense.  I will let you keep all 3 of the water packages.  If I take the extra firewood for all 3 packages then I can probably boil a lot of the water to get the harmful bacteria out.  I really appreciate your generosity 🙂.  ' 'No problem.🙂  So I will keep the 3 packages of water and, since I am giving you all 3 packages of the firewood I will take back the 1 food package and keep all 3 of the food packages.' 'I would still like at least 1 package of the food please.  There has been a lot of rain in the area, but I think some poisonous mushrooms maybe prevalent in the area, so to be extra cautious I would like a little spare food on hand.'
Utterance: 'You don't have to eat the poison mushrooms. You can catch some fish from the river or hunt for small animals.  You have all of the firewood so cooking the food should not be a problem.'

Answer: Yes


Question: Context: 'Same! I'm a little worried about some of my supplies though. What about you?' 'Likewise! What are you most in need of?' 'Well, I'm camping up on a snowy mountain and I gave some of my food away to hikers who were passing me and were very tired and hungry, so I'd really like to get some more food. Firewood would be useful too, although I do have a thick coat and a sleeping bag. I plan on melting the snow to get water, so I don't think I'll need that too much. And you?'
Utterance: 'I have the same needs. I have a low metabolism, so I need food and firewood to keep me warm and energized. Water I plan on filtering elsewhere.'

Answer: No


Question: Context: 'How about I get 3 firewood, and you get 2 food AND water? We both win with that, I think.' 'So now you need 3 firewood with 1 food. Am I correct?🙂' 'Yes, that sounds fair to me. Although I would be willing to take a water if you're offering it, I am not quite as lucky with water. ☹️'
Utterance: 'How It will be. you already told that, you have lot of food with you. So can you please think how it will be. you can take all 3 firewood with 1 water and I will take all 3 foods packages and 2 water.'

Answer:
Yes