We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

Example Input: You can't just claim "Country A has more gun control and a lower homicide rate than Country B does" and leave it at that.
Example Output: Valid

Example Input: As a gun-owner and/or strong 2nd Amendment advocate, its importance cannot be overstated, and I do believe it has the potential to render a slew of local, state and federal laws null and void.
Example Output: Valid

Example Input: Correspondingly, ammunition manufacturers are reporting record sales across the country as demand continues to outpace supply.
Example Output:
Valid