We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

[EX Q]: Sent1: Obviously, if someone were found innocent before execution, they would not be executed.
 Sent2: This process is needed in order to ensure that innocent men and woman are not executed for crimes they did not commit, and even with these protections the risk of executing an innocent person can not be completely eliminated.
[EX A]: Not similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: The death penalty is the best possible deterrent for crime.
 Sent2: If we slap a guarantueed death penalty on murder then any following murderer commits the crime on pain of death which is a much better detterent.
[EX A]: Similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: So, the only reason I can really see why people support the death penalty is to have simple vengeance against the perpretrator.
 Sent2: I would support the death penalty IF there was a way to ensure that it would not put innocent people to death.
[EX A]:
Not similar