The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the self-need strategy, otherwise output No. self-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to create a personal need for an item in the negotiation, such as by pointing out that the participant sweats a lot to show preference towards water packages.

[Q]: Context: 'okay how about if i only get 2 food packages and i give you 2 firewood. So we both gets something to help us/ Because i to at least 1 firewood' 'That would work for me if I get all 3 water still' 'How about you get 2 of the waters an i would take 1 of them? I need some water to stay hydrated '
Utterance: 'If you get two foods then I need more items overall'
[A]: No


[Q]: Context: 'I would love to have the Firewood the most. ' 'Unfortunately I need firewood the most too. How about I take 2 firewood, 2 food, and 1 water?' 'I feel that I am not getting a fair deal. '
Utterance: 'Then what do you think is fair?'
[A]: No


[Q]: Context: 'He definitely does drink a lot of water, but he's in a growth spurt so 2 would be ideal. I'm happy to give up all firewood in exchange for the extra food!' 'okay that sounds like a better deal then! I will take all the firewood and 1 food, and you can take the 2 food packages' 'Awesome, I appreciate that. How does the water need look on your side?'
Utterance: 'I think having two waters would be good for me because my mom forget to pick extras up at the store yesterday😮'
[A]:
Yes