We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

Q: (9-0) Heller, The right to keep and bear arms is a personal individual right absent any nexus to the militia.

A: Valid
****
Q: If you need guns to ensure that your government doesn't become corrupt or tyranical you wouldn't want them to know where the guns are, would you?

A: Valid
****
Q: To support this open carry ban, you have argued that no right exists to carry a loaded handgun outside the home���making them useless and therefore the ban is just sweeping up the crumbs.

A:
Valid
****