In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

Comment: "...the resulting ordinance instead requires a warrant and specific instructions to the inmate that they can deny the interview if they wish... Obviously, ICE is not pleased. And give the agency its due. "

Okay, ICE, here is your remittance as the DP has requested: You fascist jackboots will respect the will of our liberal democracy or we will correctly use it to righteously imprison and to punish you for your sins and we promise you that we will not make things easy for you if you push us to defend the principles of liberal democracy from your wrongful raping advances in this manner. You represent an illegitimate US Federal Executive, and you will not be afforded any quarter for your defiance of the true liberal democracy of The People. You've been warned.
-
Repent your sins and be at peace,
renounce all noise from orange-haired beasts.
You must not attack light nor good,
nor subvert land as darkness would.
Non-identity-attack

Comment: If teachers make a mistake, you screw up a kid.  If doctors make a mistake, someone dies.  That's pretty stressful.  
Bankers make a mistake, people lose some money.  Nobody dies.  Nobody doesn't learn to read.
Non-identity-attack

Comment: Churches are attacked in Mississauga.  Do we need a Christianphobia resolution?  Jews are attacked in Montreal and at York University.  Do we need a Judeaophobia resolution?  Why is Islam so darn special that it needs a specific resolution?

Identity-attack