instruction:
In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: threat and non-threat. Threat is a statement that someone will be hurt or harmed, especially if the person does not do something in particular.
question:
Comment: That's funny, with Obama snubbing Israel? As usual, you've got it backwards. Just like the Jews who voted for Obama in 2008. When speaking today; TEL AVIV Dec 30, 2016—Israel’s political shift to the right and growing support for building settlements made it easier for Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to respond sharply to U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry’s parting peace-plan speech, but some here are concerned he is counting too heavily on a friendlier U.S. in a Trump presidency...Welcome to Reality, brought to you from Obama?

"The Blue Dogs are out, The Red Dogs are in. Go Dog! Go!" (c) 1961.

“You go into Afghanistan, you got guys who slap women around for five years because they didn’t wear a veil. You know, guys like that ain’t got no manhood left anyway. So it’s a hell of a lot of fun to shoot them. Actually it’s quite fun to fight them, you know. It’s a hell of a hoot. It’s fun to shoot some people. I’ll be right up there with you. I like brawling.” General "Mad Dog" Mattis
answer:
Threat


question:
Comment: I can think of a few things more important than a gender-based qualification for President: A $20 trillion national debt, a failing economy, rampant illegal immigration,a bloated federal bureaucracy, senseless and costly wars in the Mideast, terrorism in our homeland, a military industrial complex, a partisan political health insurance system with onerous penalties and ridiculous costs. Add in that HRC throughout her history showed she was a lying scheming fraud propped up by "the establishment" How scary it is that 50% of voters still cast their vote for her.! "Suck it up Buttercup"...... indeed!
answer:
Non-threat


question:
Comment: Well, since tRump is basically a Faux viewer who somehow found himself in the WH, he is always going to portray himself as "aggrieved".


Just look at how he handled losing the popular vote, how he handled the staggeringly low turnout for his inauguration, even how he handles flubbing a call to a widow of a fallen soldier.



So it's only natural he would continue to act as if he's the aggrieved party here.



Elect a clown, expect a circus.
answer:

Non-threat