We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

[Q]: Sent1: I do feel that those who murder in cold blood would be more than deserving of the death penalty.
 Sent2: There are a lot of people in jail for cold blooded murder, who did not get the death penalty.
[A]: Not similar


[Q]: Sent1: pretty logical... I mean, the killer is not going to take away innocent lives anymore because the killer is dead.
 Sent2: The killer is not going to take away innocent lives anymore because the killer is dead.
[A]: Similar


[Q]: Sent1: SO in turn, there is no clear evidence indicating that there is not a detterent value to the death penalty.
 Sent2: There is absolutely ZERO evidence that the death penalty deters crime.
[A]:
Similar