Given a document, an entity and its sentiment towards the entity, verify if it is the correct sentiment towards the entity. Answer should be yes or no. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Waymo is Positive . SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) - Alphabet Inc âs Waymo  sought at least $1 billion in damages and a public apology from Uber Technologies Inc as conditions for settling  its  high-profile trade secret lawsuit against the ride-services company  sources familiar with the proposal told Reuters.
The Waymo self-driving car unit also asked that an independent monitor be appointed to ensure Uber does not use  Waymo  technology in the future  the sources said.
Uber rejected those terms as non-starters  said the sources  who were not authorized to publicly discuss settlement talks. The precise dollar amount requested by  Waymo  and the exact time the offer was made could not be learned.
 Waymoâs  tough negotiating stance  which has not been previously reported  reflects the company âs  confidence in  its  legal position after months of pretrial victories in a case which may help to determine who emerges in the forefront of the fast-growing field of self-driving cars.
The aggressive settlement demands also suggest that  Waymo  is not in a hurry to resolve the lawsuit  in part because of  its  value as a distraction for Uber leadership  said Elizabeth Rowe  a trade secret expert at the University of Florida Levin College of Law.
 Waymo  recently persuaded a San Francisco federal judge to delay a trial to decide the dispute from October to early December  citing the need to investigate evidence Uber had not disclosed earlier.
Amy Candido  a  Waymo  attorney  declined to comment on any settlement talks  but said the companyâs reasons for suing Uber are âpretty clear.â
â Waymo  had one goal: to stop Uber from using  its  trade secrets â  she  said. âThat remains  its  goal.â
 Waymo  sued Uber in February  claiming that former engineer Anthony Levandowski downloaded more than 14 000 confidential files before leaving to set up a self-driving truck company  called Otto  which Uber acquired soon after.
Uber denied using any of Waymoâs trade secrets.
FILE PHOTO: The  Waymo  logo is displayed during the company's unveil of a self-driving Chrysler Pacifica minivan during the North American International Auto Show in Detroit  Michigan  U.S.  January 8  2017. REUTERS/Brendan McDermid/File Photo
 Waymoâs  lawsuit has been disruptive for Uber. U.S. District Judge William Alsup granted  Waymoâs  request for a pretrial injunction in May  which prohibited Levandowski from working on Lidar  a key sensor technology for self-driving cars that is the crux of the current litigation.
Uber later fired Levandowski  regarded as a visionary in autonomous technology  after he refused to return Waymo documents at the heart of the case. Levandowski has asserted his constitutional right against self-incrimination and declined to answer questions from  Waymo  lawyers.
Benchmark cited  Waymo âs allegations of trade secret theft in separate litigation aimed at forcing Kalanick off Uberâs board. A Delaware judge put that lawsuit on hold and sent it to private arbitration.
On Sunday Oct. 1  the day before Kalanick was scheduled to give a deposition in the Waymo case  Kalanickâs lawyers called  Waymo  and asked to postpone the deposition  lawyers for both companies said in court last week.
Kalanickâs lawyers said he was in the middle of a fight to appoint new board members and was therefore too busy   Waymo  attorneys said in court.  Waymo  refused the request  forcing Kalanick to attend the deposition.
no

Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Eva Longoria is Positive . After Gram-Moreno mistakenly let an interview with  Eva Longoria  slip through in which Longoria did exactly that   she  said   she  was fired and was replaced by a man.
âThey said  if thereâs any mention of [Sadler] in the pre-show  make sure you flag it â  she  told the Times  recalling  her  instructions. âYouâre censoring celebrities; itâs just not a good idea in my humble opinion. But it wasnât my decision.â
Sadler very publicly split with the network in December after  she  said  she  learned  her  male co-host âmade close to double my salary for the past several years â yet  she  had been denied a pay raise.
Hereâs the interview with  Longoria  that Gram-Moreno says led to her termination:
 Eva Longoria  brings up women equal pay and says "We stand with you Catt Sadler" to Ryan Seacrest and E!. Debra Messing also called out  E ! on the red carpet. #GoldenGlobes pic.twitter.com/nzBVTI0WVz â Pop Crave (@PopCrave) January 8  2018
Debra Messing drags  E ! (while being interviewed on E!): "I was so shocked to hear that  E ! doesn't believing in paying their female co-hosts the same as their male co-hosts" pic.twitter.com/HF3B2uhwtF â David Mack (@davidmackau) January 7  2018
However  Gram-Morenoâs attorney  Katherine Atkinson  said  E ! never questioned her work.
âIn the 12 years Aileen has been working on red carpet shows for  E ! they never once raised a performance issue â Atkinson said in a statement. âThat is a convenient excuse for covering up attempts to silence women speaking out. Employers often attack women speaking out about discrimination â so I am disappointed in E! but not surprised.
âE! canât have it both ways. They support their position that they were not censoring references to Catt Sadler by pointing to  the Eva Longoria interview . But they fired my client for failing to censor  that very interview . If you attempt to censor  and then fire the person for not catching the speech you intended to censor for letting it go through  you canât then claim that you arenât so bad after all because you âletâ it air. Their argument defies logic.â
CORRECTION: An earlier version of this article said that the interview with Debra Messing was the one that led to Gram-Morenoâs dismissal. The interview she cited in her complaint was the one with  Eva Longoria .
yes

Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Reid is Positive . The Senate is expected to vote Saturday on whether to take up the legislation. The majority leader  Harry Reid  D-Nev.  refused to say Thursday whether he had the 60 votes needed to clear that procedural hurdle.
 While the guts of the Senate and House bills are similar  Reid devised a new method of financing coverage  not found in any other major health bill. His proposal would significantly increase the Medicare payroll tax for high-income people.
 Supporters of abortion rights were pleased with the treatment of abortion in Reid's bill. "It maintains the decades-long compromise of no federal funds for abortion  while allowing a woman to use her own private funds for her reproductive health care " said Sen. Barbara Boxer  D-Calif.
 Reid and other Democratic leaders said that the unveiling of the bill  composed in his office  had given them political momentum going into the first test vote. Despite solid Republican opposition  the Democrats said they were confident they could enact some kind of national health insurance program  a goal that has eluded politicians for more than 75 years. But Congress appears highly unlikely to meet President Barack Obama's goal of finishing work on the bill this year.
Reid's bill. "It maintains the decades-long compromise of no federal funds for abortion  while allowing a woman to use her own private funds for her reproductive health care " said Sen. Barbara Boxer  D-Calif.
 Reid and other Democratic leaders said that the unveiling of the bill  composed in his office  had given them political momentum going into the first test vote. Despite solid Republican opposition  the Democrats said they were confident they could enact some kind of national health insurance program  a goal that has eluded politicians for more than 75 years. But Congress appears highly unlikely to meet President Barack Obama's goal of finishing work on the bill this year.
 The Congressional Budget Office estimates that Reid's bill would provide coverage to 31 million people who are uninsured  while the House bill would cover 36 million people.
 Many provisions of the House bill would take effect in 2013. But to help hold down the cost of the bill  Reid decided to delay the effective date for many provisions by one year  to 2014.
 Reid's bill would impose a tax on "Cadillac health plans" -- employer-sponsored group health plans with premiums more than $8 500 for individual and $23 000 for family coverage. He would impose a new 5 percent tax on "elective cosmetic medical procedures." And he would impose annual fees on insurance companies and makers of medical devices and brand-name drugs. By contrast  the House relies on an income surtax to raise $460 billion from 2011 to 2019. The tax would be 5.4 percent of adjusted gross income exceeding $500 000 for individuals.

yes