Given a passage with a context and an answer, construct a question on the basis of the information present in the passage. Construct the question in such a way that (i) it is unambiguous, (ii) it is answerable from the passage, (iii) its answer is unique (iv) it answer uses text phrases from the passage. Avoid creating questions that (i) can't be answered correctly without actually understanding the passage and (ii) uses the same words or phrases given in the passage.

Context: Breast reconstruction (BR) following mastectomy for breast cancer has been shown to improve quality of life and body image; however, there is significant geographic variation in BR rates. We explored factors associated with BR following mastectomy.', 'This is a population-based data linkage study consisting of cancer registry records linked to hospital inpatient episodes for 4104 women aged 20\u2009years and over-diagnosed with a first primary invasive localized stage breast cancer between 1997 and 2012 in Queensland, Australia, who underwent a mastectomy. Multivariate logistic regression was used to model predictors of BR.', 'Overall, 481 women (11.7%) underwent reconstruction. Proportions increased over time and were higher for younger women. Younger age, more recent diagnosis, living in high or very high accessibility areas or less disadvantaged areas, smaller tumours and attending a private or high-volume hospital independently increased the odds of reconstruction. The geographical disparity reduced significantly over time.
Answer: Geographical barriers to accessing BR have reduced; however, continued monitoring and further research to inform strategies to further reduce subgroup disparities remain a priority.
Does geographical disparity in breast reconstruction following mastectomy have reduced over time?

Context: The ADAMTS13-von Willebrand factor (vWF) axis has been suggested to play a critical role in the pathophysiology of ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) in the heart or brain. Therefore, we aimed to investigate whether this axis was involved in the pathophysiology of IRI-induced acute kidney injury.', 'We performed renal IRI in ADAMTS13 knockout (KO) or wild type (WT) mice. Functional and histological kidney damage, and inflammation were compared and the effect of anti-vWF antibodies in ADAMTS13 KO mice was assessed.', 'Following IRI, the blood and kidney ADAMTS13 levels were significantly decreased. vWF expression was significantly upregulated in both the medulla and cortex of injured kidneys as shown by immunohistochemistry and western blot analyses. There was also an increased level of vWF dimers after IRI. In ADAMTS13 KO mice, kidney vWF levels were further increased and this was associated with greater endothelial and epithelial injury compared to WT mice, suggesting an important role of vWF in renal IRI. In addition, the number of Gr-1
Answer: Our data show that the ADAMTS13-vWF axis is partially involved in the pathophysiology of kidney IR, suggesting that regulating ADAMTS13- and vWF-dependent mechanisms could have therapeutic potential to limit renal IRI. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Is the ADAMTS13-von Willebrand factor axis involved in the pathophysiology of kidney ischemia-reperfusion injury?

Context: The metabolic response to surgery includes a net loss of proteins that influences negatively the clinical evolution of the patients. We investigated the effect of perioperative nutrition on protein metabolism alterations immediately after surgery.', 'A control group of 21 surgery patients were submitted to conventional perioperative nutritional protocol (18 h of fasting plus low-dose glucose after surgery). An experimental group of eight similar patients was given complete parenteral nutrition during 24 h before and 24 h after surgery. Nitrogen balance, whole body protein synthesis, breakdown, and 3-methylhistidine were determined before surgery and 24 h after surgery.', 'The immediate response to surgery with conventional nutritional management was a net protein loss (-1.023 g prot. kg(-1) day(-1)), caused by an increase in the protein breakdown (137.9% of preoperative values), while the protein synthesis remained unchanged (98.4%). The 3-methylhistidine excretion was not increased in respect to perioperative values, suggesting that the degraded protein was not from muscular origin. The experimental group with perioperative nutrition showed neither protein loss (+0.075 g prot. kg(-1) day(-1)) nor changes in protein synthesis or breakdown vs. preoperative values (96.3% and 88.0%, respectively).
Answer: Perioperative nutrition prevents the early protein losses after gastrointestinal surgery.

Does perioperative nutrition prevent the early protein losses in patients submitted to gastrointestinal surgery?