In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.
--------
Question: Comment: Sure thing gadabout. Just put that sad face when you can't discredit my claim. God forbid you have to agree with someone on the opposite spectrum as you. How tolerant of you goofs. Discredit the claim that war is more profitable then peace. Give it a whirl not a pathetic sad face.

Answer: Non-identity-attack


Question: Comment: Could it be "poopsy" the mayor of Springfield's son striking again.

Answer: Non-identity-attack


Question: Comment: Everyone will be challenged--Eucharistic theologians, presiders, and congregants. In one sense the congregations will face the biggest challenge. Our present EPs, nearly everywhere across the spectrum, are designed for presidential proclamation, with very limited congregational participation. I have participated in prayer where sections of the EP is spoken by the congregation and that helps draw people in. Additionally there is a large amount of cosmic language out and about in popular culture, and almost everyone has encountered it--from greeting cards to novels and television; so how do we not come out sounding a bit like a white-haired ancient-of-days? Having said all that, we remember eecummings and his sentence: damn everything but the circus. Continue writing, celebrating, refining, and praying up storms of witness!

Answer:
Non-identity-attack