In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Input: Consider Input: Comment: Wow, 1 emotionally charged letter from some anonymous person from Los Angeles causes a representative from Hawaii to not represent her constituents but react out of fear. We need stronger representatives here, who will actually act in our best interest. This is just sad that she would react so quickly and cowardly to such a statement.

Output: Non-sexual-explicit


Input: Consider Input: Comment: Hogwash Gary - You cannot have your cake and eat it too. That is what I disrespect most about evolutionists, is the hypocrisy. If you are going to live by the sword, you must die by it. At least have the courage to admit and accept it. And why is sexual violence any more unacceptable that violence, the fact is you have no foundation as a Darwinist to condemn anything of this nature. If you are going to travel down this road, then you MUST defend animals we eat, and every other act of "violence" that imposes an outside will upon another being. I can discuss any topic rationally with any person, but hypocrisy is something I will not deal with.

Output: Non-sexual-explicit


Input: Consider Input: Comment: You know the others guys life does matter and i am sure that his community is mourning the loss just like ours is mourning Chase. NO one really knows what happened that morning, why he crossed the line. NO need to talk bad upon the dead. What if that was your loved one? Would you wanna read douche bag comments.......think before you type


Output: Non-sexual-explicit