In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Input: Consider Input: Comment: Denying that  a Creator actually created the universe  is akin to denying that anyone 'created'  a housing development or a piece of art. If I said the housing development just appeared out of nowhere you'd say I was crazy and you would be right. Yet the  belief that the entire universe had no designer, no builder and no intelligence behind it and it just  appeared is accepted, with a straight face,  as a fact. Just because we don't know how God did something  doesn't mean He didn't do it.  That kind of reasoning is absurd and not at all 'scientific'.

Output: Non-obscene


Input: Consider Input: Comment: Trump failed President

Output: Non-obscene


Input: Consider Input: Comment: Cargo must be cursed. He finally hits a ball into the gap and the bounce over the wall costs him a sure RBI. 

Hoffman wasn't terrible tonight, but he nibbled way too much. He has good enough stuff to get good hitters out, but not if he's behind in the count all the time, or giving back the count with waste pitches.

Story's defense is terrific but man, he's a strikeout waiting to happen when the chips are down.


Output: Obscene