In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.

Example Input: Comment: Dear Margaret,

As long as Justin wins elections, he doesn't need advice from you. Just like Trump didn't. You made wrong electoral predictions about both of them.

How about advising Trump not to act like a 5 year old with a Twitter account?

Who knows, he might actually grow up?
Example Output: Disagree

Example Input: Comment: Meanwhile Canada sends the largest contingent in the WORLD to green energy conferences.

The money is there.   Governments have a spending problem, not a revenue problem.    Trim budgets and the whack of public sector workers retiring at age 54.     We can't afford it anymore.
Example Output: Agree

Example Input: Comment: Furlong did lie. Let's not forget that. At first he denied being in BC during an earlier stint in Burns Lake, then he admitted it, downplaying the commission of almost 2 years of his life and his original start in Canada. While that doesn't mean he hid something, it does bring up the matter of deception and convenient forgetfulness.

That si why he has zero claim for libel or wrongful dismissal.

So let him get on with his life, but not as a trusted public speaker or figure. His showboating style (Evermet him? Lots of self-promotion in his personality) is something he paid a price for.
Example Output:
Disagree