In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: toxic and non-toxic. Toxicity is defiend as anything that is rude, disrespectful, or unreasonable that would make someone want to leave a converation.

Input: Consider Input: Comment: Kamala "prosecute climate change deniers" Harris is not fit for high office. As CalifornAG she refused to defend initiatives the voters approved, refusing to do her job. She has a feeble mind and no positive accomplishments to speak of. She is just another member of the misguided lefty personality cult, so the idiots want to make her president. #Estupidos

Output: Toxic


Input: Consider Input: Comment: A firm justification for laws limiting the freedom of citizens is the protection of others who might be adversely affected.  In the case of alcohol, there is a potential danger of drunken driving and other acts committed under the influence.  Good laws do not limit individual freedom unless it significantly advances the safety or rights of the general population.  In the present instance, the purchase and use of cigarettes by the younger population does not significantly impact the safety or rights of the general population.  Therefore this restriction on freedom does not conform to good democratic practice.  The dangers of second hand smoke are addressed by other laws prohibiting smoking in various places.  This law represents only the limitation of individual freedom because of the opinions and preferences of others.  In a free society, limitations on freedom should be avoided except when absolutely necessary.

Output: Non-toxic


Input: Consider Input: Comment: Because he is a moron.


Output: Toxic