Given a document and an entity the task is to select the author's sentiment towards the entity. Sentiments can be Positive, Neutral and Negative. Select Positive if the article expresses a positive view towards the given entity or praises its quality or skills. Select Neutral if the document expresses no clear view towards the entity or has equal amounts of positive and negative statements or expressing some fact/quote by someone else. Select Negative if the article expresses a negative view towards like harsh remarks, criticizing entities action/decision etc. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

[Q]: What is the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Jiah Yoo ? Even after accounting for things like a person's age  gender  socioeconomic status  and chronic health conditions  there was a significant difference between the two groups: "American adults who experience high levels of positive emotions  such as feeling 'cheerful' and 'extremely happy ' are more likely to have healthy blood-lipid profiles " explains lead study author Jiah Yoo  but the same was not true among Japanese adults.
The discrepancy   she  adds  "suggests that health implications of positive emotions may not be completely driven by the inherent nature of positive emotions  but also shaped by American cultural context."
"In American cultures  experiencing positive emotions is seen as desirable and is even encouraged via socialization "  Yoo  explains. "But in East Asian cultures  people commonly view positive emotions as having dark sides -- they are fleeting  may attract unnecessary attention from others  and can be a distraction from focusing on important tasks."
 Yoo  believes the cultural influence on the positivity-health connection may be the result of culturally specific health behaviors. "Frequent experience of positive affect in the Western context would be aligned with prescribed values and beliefs  and thus likely motivate engagement in and pursuit of healthy behaviors "  she  explains. "In contrast  positive affect aligns less with norms and beliefs about positive affect in the East Asian context  and thus may not be associated with healthy behaviors."
After all  experiencing a full range of emotions is perfectly healthy  and a least one study has shown that there's a benefit to embracing your negative emotions .  Yoo  says it's possible that Americans' mental and physical health could improve if we start viewing negativity as more acceptable.
But there are some caveats of the study. One is that this study design can only show correlation  not causation.  Yoo  says it also doesn't address the fact that "sometimes positive emotions may not be healthy  even in the U.S." Indeed  some research points to the damaging health effects of our relentless pursuit of positivity and happiness.
[A]: Positive


[Q]: What is the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Alistair Pike ? The discovery brings researchers one step closer to understanding how it is that humans developed art and language and religion — the types of symbolic and cultural expressions that have always been thought to elevate humans from other species  said archaeologist  Alistair Pike  of Britain’s University of Southampton  who was part of the research team.
“It’s almost the definition of being human ”  Pike  told The Washington Post. “It’s how we define ourselves as different from other animals and primates  having language and cultural expression. There’s been a lot of work trying to understand where in Homo sapiens’s lineage did we first become symbolic individuals?”
Perhaps   Pike  said   it  started with Neanderthals.
Still  Stringer stressed that there is still not definite proof of Neanderthals’ ability to make figurative art — of animals and people — because the animals the researchers found on the paintings in Spain have uncertain origins.  Pike  said  it  was not entirely clear whether humans may have stumbled upon the Neanderthal paintings and simply added to them with the vague animal drawings  or if they were a part of the original Neanderthal designs; the researchers have not yet dated them   he  said.
The discovery that they did not  in fact  need the help of modern humans puts Neanderthals and humans on a more level playing field   Pike  said  given that tens of thousands of years ago  modern humans weren’t all that sophisticated either. The end goal with this research  he said  is to understand how the brain became wired for symbolic expression — but that’s going to require a lot more cave discoveries.
“If we’re going to try to find out when we started thinking like humans  we’re going to have to go back further in time ”  Pike  said. “What we’re interested in is when the brain became modern  and that’s a really difficult thing to get at. You can see how big it was by looking at the size of the skull  but it’s really hard to know how it was wired inside. If the use of symbols and symbolic behavior can be used as a proxy for how the brain was wired  then we can understand how the brain evolved.”
The Neanderthals went extinct about 5 000 years after humans arrived in Europe. The suspected causes have ranged from climate change that affected available food to competition with modern humans. As research moves forward   Pike  said  it may be useful to keep in mind that perhaps humans and Neanderthals were not as different as we thought.
“There’s always been a sense that all this expression  this art  arrived with modern humans  and Neanderthals might have been copying them in the very late period of their existence ”  Pike  said. But wouldn’t it be interesting if it was in fact the other way around? Modern humans may have landed on the moon — but they started out in the same place as Neanderthals.”
[A]: Positive


[Q]: What is the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Sam Roggeveen ? Given the description  Monday's test was likely to be of the SC-19 system that was believed to have been used in knocking out a Chinese satellite in a 2007 test  said  Sam Roggeveen  a senior fellow with the Sydney-based Lowy Institute international policy  think tank.
However  the exercise may not have included an actual interception utilizing the missile's kill vehicle  but might have simply been a test of the missile's booster   Roggeveen  said.  He  also warned against assuming that the test was aimed at the U.S.  pointing instead to other regional players.
"This missile system is designed to intercept medium-range ballistic missiles  and Washington does not deploy those in the Asia-Pacific " Roggeveen said. "On the other hand  both North Korea and India do have such missiles  so this test is more about them "  he  said.
The ability to independently manufacture advanced armaments  including stealth fighters  aircraft carriers and missile defense systems  is key to China's rise as a global military power   Roggeveen  said.
[A]:
Positive