Given a document, an entity and its sentiment towards the entity, verify if it is the correct sentiment towards the entity. Answer should be yes or no. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Steven Mnuchin is Negative . "I assure you that we don't want bags of cash " Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin testified on Tuesday during an appearance before the House Financial Services Committee. "We want to make sure that we can collect our necessary taxes and other things."
Last week  a top Treasury official wrote in a letter to lawmakers that the department is "consulting with law enforcement" about whether to maintain the guidance for depository institutions. Last month  a  Mnuchin  deputy testified at a Senate hearing that the banking document remains in effect while the administration weighs whether to revoke it.
At the Tuesday hearing   Mnuchin  confirmed that the department is "reviewing the existing guidance." But he clarified that he doesn't want to rescind it without having an alternate policy in place to address public safety concerns.
Rep. Brad Sherman (D-CA) told  Mnuchin  that simply deleting the banking memo "would really make it better for armed robbers in my community  because there'd be huge amounts of cash at the local marijuana dispensary."
"We specifically haven't taken it down  " Mnuchin  said of the 2014 memo. "We are looking at what Justice has done. And again  as I said  we're sensitive to the issue of dealing with the public safety issue and also making sure that the IRS and others have ways of collecting taxes without taking in cash."
In response to comments about pending congressional legislation to address cannabis businesses' access to financial services   Mnuchin  pledged to consult with White House Office of Management and Budget Director Mick Mulvaney  who as a member of Congress previously sponsored a similar bill.
During the hearing   Mnuchin  also appeared to confirm a Reuters report that FinCEN was not consulted in advance about Sessionsâs decision to change federal marijuana enforcement policy.
no

Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Luke Cage is Neutral . Netflix just published the new âDefendersâ series  the culmination of several years of work by Marvel Television to get Marvel into prestige serial storytelling. (We have to find a new word for this: we canât call it âTVâ much longer.) The Marvel-Netflix deal now includes two seasons of âDaredevil â and one each of âJessica Jones â âLuke Cage â and âIron Fist.â Thatâs 65 episodes  plus the new eight-episode âDefenders â around 50 minutes each. Thatâs more than 60 hours on screen in the last two years.
Now  you can blame whatâs wrong with âThe Defendersâ on the Marvel shtick: America has no enemies but its own divisions. The heroes inevitably fight each other. That could work if you had writers who understood Americaâs divisions  but itâs disastrous when all youâve got is pettiness and liberal identity politics. âThe Defendersâ does better than any Marvel movie to give you thrilling fights  however. At least Daredevil does;  Luke Cage  is also pretty good; the other two were deficient to begin with and apparently not getting better.
There is a deep argument hidden somewhere in this mess of a story. But to see it develop  the viewer has to ask himself: why is Daredevil so scared of his own heroism  which might lead him to kill people? Heâs a Catholic  of course. And weâre reminded of that in an important scene in a confessional. But whatâs the import of that fact? Why is  Luke Cage  telling a grieving mother  he  learned about the power of prayer from  his  own father?  He âs an heir to MLKâs sacrifice and hope  as we know from  his  own show  but why does that matter here? The evil guys  too: why is their quest for immortality so evil or wrong? We all want to live as long as possible  anyway!
Instead  we get this mess of American social pathologies of individualism and evil ninjas. This is worthless for articulating the fight between two worlds  one dedicated to equality  the other inequality. Maybe future stories will get better. A friend pointed out that thereâs a lot of Christianity in the first season of âLuke Cage â and the second season is supposed to be more serious about civil rights. He also pointed out another sign of hope: civil rights are connected with the Second Amendment.
In my previous essay  I said high-flying civil rights rhetoric collapses in âLuke Cage.â Behold: in an emotional moment mid-season  Luke Cage tells a young black man-turned-criminal about Crispus Attucksâthe first man killed in the Boston Massacre of 1770  and thus  the first martyr of the American Revolution. He was black. We see his legacy exploited by a gangster and a politician  who abuse Harlem while pretending to save it. Unlike Attucks  they always put themselves first  because when they were poor  weak  and needed protection  nobody put them first.
 Luke Cage  takes a shot to the head from that stupid  scared young criminalâbut it makes no dramatic sense  with a literally bulletproof hero.  Luke Cage  is no Crispus Attucks. Our stories fake sacrifice  and thus betray our deepest awareness of our neediness. Thatâs because of our politics and our fear of death.
yes

Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Weinstein Harvey is Positive . Bloom was quick to add that she’s not part of any litigation against the Times. Another attorney  Charles Harder — who represented wrestler Hulk Hogan in the defamation suit that led to the demise of the website Gawker last year — is handling that part of  Weinstein ’s response  she said.
But she said the newspaper gave  Weinstein  48 hours to respond to a long list of accusations and that it refused to grant  him  more time when “we begged for it.” (A Times spokeswoman said  Weinstein  was given adequate time to respond to “events  he  had first-hand knowledge of” and that the newspaper had included “all relevant comments from  Mr. Weinstein ” in its story. She added  “Mr. Weinstein and  his  lawyer . . . have not pointed to any errors or challenged any facts in our story.”)
Bloom said her role over the past year or so has been to counsel  Weinstein  about his workplace behavior  especially his treatment of women. She said she has had “frank talks” with him about his legendary temper  his use of profanity in public settings and his propensity for “loose talk about sex” around women he employs or has worked with.
In a statement Thursday  she said  Weinstein  “is reading books and going to therapy.  He  is an old dinosaur learning new ways.”
Bloom said Weinstein hired her about a year ago after he and the rapper Jay-Z jointly bought the TV rights to her 2014 book  “Suspicion Nation ” about the Trayvon Martin case. She said she began speaking with him at that time about long-standing rumors in Hollywood about him. “I don’t hold back  and I didn’t ” she said. “ Harvey  can take it  and  he  did.  He  said  ‘I’ve been stupid. I’m a dinosaur  and I’ve got to change.’ I thought  ‘Perhaps I can do something to make a difference.’ ”

no