In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

[EX Q]: Comment: If there ever existed a good reason for Cdn taxpayers to subsidize the dairy industry (so-called 'supply-management'), that time has long since passed.  With any luck, Trump's lament will finally give our government reason to do what it's never had the backbone to undertake- end supply management.

Hate to say it, but we Canadians are beyond stupid on this one. Ignorance is not bliss.
[EX A]: Non-obscene

[EX Q]: Comment: Kissing ass and playing politics more important to him than the people he represents.  Sad choice.
[EX A]: Obscene

[EX Q]: Comment: It is obvious who wants it.  The insurance companies want the government to pay all their expenses plus their profit margins.  They don't care about sicker individuals having to pay more because they have been charging them more since insurance companies began.  Why do good drivers pay less than bad drivers?  Why do life insurance companies charge less for younger people? If the government would cover their costs, auto insurers would sell policies to drunk drivers and life insurance companies would sell 1 million dollar policies to 85 year old men, for cheap.  We saw what happened when the government guaranteed home loans to anyone with a pulse.  

Senator Cruz's addition to the bill returns a small portion of the free choice Americans used to enjoy. The insurance companies would have to compete for business and have lower profit margins. Is it any surprise that they want Uncle Sam paying bills for an ever expanding captive market?  

Just repeal this stinking Socialist boondoggle.
[EX A]:
Non-obscene