In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

[EX Q]: Comment: Do it.  This country is committing a massive ethical violation given $10mm to a terrorist.  The United States needs to stand up to the disgusting way the Trudeau government has treated their people.
[EX A]: Non-identity-attack

[EX Q]: Comment: Didn’t this mudshark and her nigger get killed by another nigger in a high drug area?? They were probably going to buy drugs. Oh well no big loss.
[EX A]: Identity-attack

[EX Q]: Comment: This scientist should be embarrassed for writing such a hypocrisy filled document.
It is clear from nearly all scientific comparisons of alcohol and cannabis that alcohol is far more dangerous to physical and mental health with additional extra harms socially.
Why this writer endorses ongoing sales of alcohol with open advertising and promotion of use, yet simultaneously demands that cannabis be sold with no advertising doled out from behind a counter to maximize shame is simply incomprehensible. But it certainly is concordant with the ideology that drove the current legislative proposal before parliament.
[EX A]:
Non-identity-attack