We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

Input: Consider Input: Under English common law, the Castle Doctrine was intended to be a narrow exception to the general duty to retreat.

Output: Invalid


Input: Consider Input: So now you're saying that just because somebody owns a gun, they're somehow more likely to start killing people than somebody who doesn't own a gun?

Output: Valid


Input: Consider Input: I would support any law that target criminals, but I will not support you as long as you target lawfull gun owners.


Output: Valid