In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

[Q]: Comment: This topic must be expanded beyond "clergy sex abuse" to abuse of all kinds by clergy. There are priests who engage in patterns of verbal and emotional abuse which are just as damaging to the victims, and if the victims report the treatment, they are ridiculed, intimidated and manipulated to keep silent by those in authority over these abusers, who go merrily on their way, thinking, "As long as I'm not caught in bed with a woman, or a man, or looking at porn on a computer, nothing will happen." They behave like spoiled children, and those in authority enable and protect them.
[A]: Sexual-explicit


[Q]: Comment: Racist Republican haters rants for the last 8 years:

I lost my keys! Thanks Obama....
My ice cream melted! Thanks Obama....
TV's broken again!!!! Thanks Obama....
Car won't start! Thanks Obama....
Is that a stain on my new shirt?! Thanks Obama...
Rain, again?!! Thanks Obama...
Too much sun! Thanks Obama...
It snowed again last night! Thanks Obama...
My dog pooped on the carpet! Thanks Obama...
My eyes itch! Thanks Obama...
[A]: Non-sexual-explicit


[Q]: Comment: Re "Too Close!":  Some readers have described the LW's lack of comfort with the brother/sister sharing of the bathroom as crazy or looney.  I don't think people who react that way realize they were lucky enough to come from a healthy family, at least in that respect.  I've had more than one friend who was sexually assaulted by a brother growing up, and in my extended family, one brother orchestrated a gang rape of his own brother.  Maybe because of my history, in my own family there were lines of privacy around intimate body care that were never disturbed or questioned, so I can imagine being uncomfortable with the situation LW described.
[A]:
Sexual-explicit