In this task, you will be presented with a context from an academic paper and a question separated with a 
. You have to answer the question based on the context.

Example Input: A context is upward entailing (shown by [... $\leavevmode {\color {red!80!black}\uparrow }$ ]) that allows an inference from ( "Introduction" ) to ( "Introduction" ), where French dinner is replaced by a more general concept dinner.  On the other hand, a downward entailing context (shown by [... $\leavevmode {\color {blue!80!black}\downarrow }$ ]) allows an inference from ( "Introduction" ) to ( "Introduction" ), where workers is replaced by a more specific concept new workers. All [ workers $\leavevmode {\color {blue!80!black}\downarrow }$ ] [joined for a French dinner $\leavevmode {\color {red!80!black}\uparrow }$ ] All workers joined for a dinner All new workers joined for a French dinner Not all [new workers $\leavevmode {\color {red!80!black}\uparrow }$ ] joined for a dinner Not all workers joined for a dinner 
 Question: How do they define upward and downward reasoning?
Example Output: Upward reasoning is defined as going from one specific concept to a more general one. Downward reasoning is defined as the opposite, going from a general concept to one that is more specific.

Example Input: Our system, including software and corpus, is available as an open source project for free research purpose and we believe that it is a good baseline for the development and comparison of future Vietnamese SRL systems.  
 Question: Are their corpus and software public?
Example Output: Yes

Example Input: Out of 43 teams our system ranked 421st with an official F1-score of 0.2905 on the test set. Although our model outperforms the baseline in the validation set in terms of F1-score, we observe important drops for all metrics compared to the test set, showing that the architecture seems to be unable to generalize well. 
 Question: What were their results on the test set?
Example Output:
an official F1-score of 0.2905 on the test set