In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine the neutral choice based on your inference from the statement and your commonsense knowledge. The neutral choice is a sentence that neither agrees nor disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3', corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence. If sentence X agrees with sentence Y, one's correctness follows from the other one. If sentence X disagrees with sentence Y, they can not be correct at the same time.

[EX Q]: Statement: yeah i i've  i've seen uh they're they make some plastic edging stuff that comes in like three foot lengths and you can uh you can tape them together and and and put Choices: 1. The three foot plastic edgings are very convenient. 2. They don't make plastic edgings bigger than a foot. 3. There are three foot plastic edgings that you can tape together.
[EX A]: 1

[EX Q]: Statement: It's pretty obvious what conservative politicians are trying to do  develop a winning issue for the 1998 election. Choices: 1. Ahead of the 1998 election, conservative politicians are seeking a winning issue to campaign on. 2. Many commentators feel that even with a winning issue, conservative politicians will struggle to win votes. 3. Liberal politicians are trying to find a winning issue ahead of the 1998 election.
[EX A]: 2

[EX Q]: Statement: In Newsweek , George Stephanopoulos argues that killing Saddam would be a more effective method of deposing the dictator than a bombing campaign. Choices: 1. Bombing has been a way for powerful countries to remove their enemies. 2. George Stephanopoulos commends the use of a bombing campaign. 3. George Stephanopoulos argues that killing Saddam is more effective than bombing.
[EX A]:
1