We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Ex Input:
Sent1: This appeared to me to be an argument that self defense cannot exist if a gun is used.
 Sent2: I am, however, suprised that gun rights advocates use this case to defend the right to own guns, because the case seems to imply the opposite, as stated by Tim.

Ex Output:
Not similar


Ex Input:
Sent1: This is needed to prevent gun owners from covering up sales to prohibited purchasers by later claiming ��� when those guns are traced to crime ��� that their guns were stolen.
 Sent2: Many thousands of Guns are stolen and used in GUN CREATED CRIME because most legal gun owners

Ex Output:
Not similar


Ex Input:
Sent1: Certainly illegal transfers but I would also look at those that can't seem to secure their weapons against theft.
 Sent2: Making guns illegal, requiring background checks, banning scary looking guns, banning certain bullets and reestricting concealed carry to those who are willing to put their name, fingerprints, and such on file does nothing to control crime.

Ex Output:

Not similar