In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: threat and non-threat. Threat is a statement that someone will be hurt or harmed, especially if the person does not do something in particular.

[Q]: Comment: If we're 1-3 you can bet dollars to donuts that Siemian is the problem.  Unless we are 1-3 and averaging 25 pts per game, which we know won't be true with our defense.  I'm not saying he'll be entirely to blame, I'm saying people don't give him enough blame.  There were alot of reasons we lost that Titans game last year, but at 10-13 if Trevor makes one play, we win the game or send it to overtime.  He couldn't do it.
[A]: Non-threat


[Q]: Comment: The Church does not, and should not, condone sinful behavior as something good. This stance in no way can be equated with what Mateen did to these people at Pulse. That action was driven by hate, and hate alone.

This goes to a larger piece which addressed this ideological hate with rallies across the country this past weekend. The Left reflexively came to the defense of shariah adherent ideologues who have no problem killing homosexuals. In fact, they take it as a duty. WHY?
[A]: Threat


[Q]: Comment: She was rude.  Big deal.  He wrote a whole column questioning the values of Canadians based on one rude person.  Me thinks a chip on the shoulder may need to fall off.
[A]:
Non-threat