TASK DEFINITION: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.
PROBLEM: Comment: "It does seem a little hypocritical for Dogwood to be complaining about Kinder Morgan playing a role in the B.C. election through its donations to the BC Liberals, when it is receiving money from the United States to fight for causes aligned with interests there. "
In one case, foreign interests donate money to advocacy groups.
In the other, foreign interests donate money to a political party whose members currently form the provincial government. 
Not even remotely equivalent, Gary, and tf. hardly hypocritical of Dogwood to complain about it.

SOLUTION: Non-obscene

PROBLEM: Comment: Money whores, greedy money grubbing whores.

SOLUTION: Obscene

PROBLEM: Comment: '
The fascist Trump called it a ban.  

It's way too late for you to revise history and claim it's not what Trump called it.  It was a ban.

Now it's been denied, as it should be.
.

…and we already have a thorough vetting process in place.

Save your fear mongering.   And quit watching BIllo O'Liely.  Good grief.

.

SOLUTION:
Non-obscene