We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

[Q]: Like I said before, claiming that semi-automatic rifles get a lower level of constitutional protection than handguns because they are less useful for self defense seems absurd from historical point of view.
[A]: Valid


[Q]: You argue that people cannot be trusted with guns, because they might injure themselves in accidents (hence the 4.46 figure).
[A]: Valid


[Q]: Doctors make medical decisions for you because they have knowledge which the average person does not have.
[A]:
Valid