TASK DEFINITION: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
PROBLEM: Guy:  surely you meant to proofread before posting?

SOLUTION: Yes

PROBLEM: This 20 page opinion is a real example of legal hair splitting.  The Supreme Court  acknowledges that libel is actionable per se (without money damage or special harm) if false information is published in a written form (like this site).  They then wander off to the Supreme Court and 9th Circuit opinions and decide that in spite of all that, basically that “two-faced,” “crooked” and “rude.” were not 'provably false' and based on all the facts and circumstances, protected by the 1st Amendment, in the facts of  this case.  This is going to make such lawsuits even more unpredictable than they already were, in my opinion.

SOLUTION: No

PROBLEM: I'm not an Alaskan or a Dem. I am a left wing but consider myself an independent. I support Bernie Sanders policies not Bernie Sanders.  I am sick of never having the policies I believe in delivered.  The country had drifted right cos the Dems have drifted right. There is only one way for me too hold the Dems accountable for the drift right that has been going on for 30 years.  Donald Trump is a 4 year problem.  If I don't support the Dems in this election then they might stop with the "hippie punching" and screwing over the base which they have been doing for 30 years. 

Part of me hopes Trump wins just to get the people who brought us to this place out of office. As much as I don't want Trump, I don't want more of the same.  And that's clearly what you are offering me in HRC.

SOLUTION:
No