In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

Q: Comment: It's always amusing how these phony conservatives are on their knees to gang members, because they are on the public dole and and wear gang colors that they approve of. I don't mind paying one to kill and beat up people I don't like. (As long as the their time at the the trough is within reason) Must I kiss their behinds while they pick my pocket?

A: Non-identity-attack
****
Q: Comment: Ummm . . . . we just wrapped up 8 years of Barrack Obama with his incredibly sensitive but confused, milquetoast approach to international terrorism - which only gave rise to ISIS and is fast-tracking Iran to a nuclear bomb.

I'm sorry, but it's amazing how it's always a Muslim columnist in a western newspaper or a Muslim personality on a cable news network show who are so critical of the west but so insightful with all of the answers on how the west can jump through the hoops and finally gain peace from Islam.

Hey, how about it if Islam takes the big step and turns off the flow of terror and violence upon its own people as well as the west? Muslims terrorize and kill far more Muslims than they do of westerners. Try sorting his one out for yourselves first and we'll all benefit.

A: Identity-attack
****
Q: Comment: thank you motley.......you, with your post, highlight the difficulty in discussing this issue.  You seem to suggest that anyone opposed to kids playing football is somehow emasculating them.  Football is a "manly" sport and carries with it tremendous status for high school boys.  It's not surprising that over a million young men (and a few young women) play high school football each year.  

I would suggest that the possibility of lifelong brain damage from playing football far, far outweighs the possible emotional damage and sexual role identification issues from NOT playing football.  Additionally, of course, were there not football, these same kids would be playing other very active and, at the same time, less damaging sports....so their masculinity might still be saved (thank goodness)....(that's a little sarcasm at the end, by the way)   Gary Crum

A:
Non-identity-attack
****