In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine the neutral choice based on your inference from the statement and your commonsense knowledge. The neutral choice is a sentence that neither agrees nor disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3', corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence. If sentence X agrees with sentence Y, one's correctness follows from the other one. If sentence X disagrees with sentence Y, they can not be correct at the same time.
--------
Question: Statement: Bill Didn't Inhale Clinton, Newt Gingrich, and Al Gore have all admitted to having tried drugs in their early days. Choices: 1. Every one of them has admitted to having tried drugs. 2. Every one of them has admitted to having tried drugs, since when they were young it was common. 3. Every one of them has admitted to never having tried drugs.

Answer: 2


Question: Statement: Increased fuel economy achieved by a reduction of engine deposits is estimated to be over $295 million for the same time period. Choices: 1. There has been a decrease in the fuel economy. 2. The engine deposits cause cars to be fuel inefficient. 3. Almost $295 million in fuel cost savings have been achieved.

Answer: 2


Question: Statement: This holding not only has no foundation in our jurisprudence Choices: 1. Our jurisprudence is clearly the foundation for this holding. 2. Holdings can have foundations in our jurisprudence. 3. This holding is that all people are entitled to keep and raise chickens in their houses.

Answer:
3