The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.

Ex Input:
Context: 'Hey! I'm doing great, how are you? ' 'Looking forward to doing some serious hiking with the family.  bad luck on the way here we flew in and the airline loss or bags with some of our supplies and sleeping bags.☹️' 'oh nooo, that's terrible. do they know where they left them?'
Utterance: 'I think they went to Chicago.  I really needing replace our lost water and sleeping bags.  I see there are some extra supplies to share.  I could really use the water and firwood.  🙂'

Ex Output:
Yes


Ex Input:
Context: 'I tend to eat more food when I am active outside. I drink more water too because I don't want to get dehydrated.' 'OH OK ' 'Do you have reasons for wanting food?'
Utterance: 'FOOD IS GIVE TO THE MORE ENERGY '

Ex Output:
No


Ex Input:
Context: 'I actually got really dehydrated on my last camping trip, so don't want to be completely without water. How about 2 for you, 1 for me?' 'That is good, is it possible that I could get some firewood as well? I may be suffering from hypothermia.' 'Oh wow! I don't want you to be that cold! :o  If I can have 3 food, I'd be happy for you to have 2 firewood.'
Utterance: 'That would be great, I'm not real hungry, so I can spare some food.'

Ex Output:

No