In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: toxic and non-toxic. Toxicity is defiend as anything that is rude, disrespectful, or unreasonable that would make someone want to leave a converation.
--------
Question: Comment: You are a nut ball.

Answer: Toxic


Question: Comment: Let them die ..
Maybe we should build concentration camps with gas chambers...
hurry that death on a bit?.

Answer: Toxic


Question: Comment: I do not have the same faith as you do that the money is already there. Currently the largest portion of Medicare is funded by federal income taxes which are very reflective of a progressive tax structure already. 

But it is not just some will pay more and some less, some will receive less coverage and some more. These differences should be stated openly and honestly.

If children are currently covered by a private employer sponsored health plan than the company supplied premiums and the employee supplied premiums are funding the children's coverage. If "Medicare for All" is funded by increased taxes for the employer and increased taxes for the employee that seems to leave a gap for all dependent care coverage. The funds to cover dependents will need to come from somewhere.

Again state honestly and succinctly how is coverage changing and from whom and how is the funding being generated. Otherwise "Medicare for All" is not a solution but a deception.

Answer:
Non-toxic