Given a document, generate a short title of the document. The title should convey the main idea/event/topic about which the document is being written. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].
--------
Question: We know that  Nikolas Cruz  wasn't hiding a thing about  his  killing rage in the months and even years before the Florida school massacre.
According to the best British newspaper in America  the Daily Mail   Nikolas Cruz  abused his ex and sold knives out of a lunchbox.  He  was disciplined by the school 25 times and finally expelled.
Good Morning America could not pass up an interview with survivor Ariana Lopez. In her circle  everybody knew that  Cruz  was dangerous.  He  didn't bother to hide it. According to  Ms. Lopez  Cruz  was signaling  his  rage and murderous feelings like mad.
Lopez made it clear during her interview that  Cruz 's problematic behavior and mental health issues were on clear display at school. 'He used to sell knives out of his lunch box  which I thought was insane. You can't have knives  this is a school'  said Lopez of  Cruz . 'He would be like  "hey guys  want some knives?"' One of the incidents that led to his being disciplined was a fight in September 2016. Footage of the brawl emerged over the weekend.  Cruz  was suspended for two days as a result of the fight  which was over a former girlfriend.
This changes the picture completely: what the hell were the school counselors and police authorities doing while  Cruz  was signaling murderous intentions? There is an air of looming tragedy over the Florida school killings  and secretly  many people knew or suspected what was to come.
Any competent teacher  administrator  school cop  or counselor should have seen the signs and should have diverted  Cruz  into a protected environment where  he  could be educated and monitored. If  his  friend Ariana knew he was selling knives  so did dozens of other kids  teachers  administrators  and all the rest. No person in authority acted responsibly. They just kicked the can down the road.
There is no mystery about the Nikolas Cruzes of the world. They have been around forever. It's just that they were spotted and taken care of with discipline and  yes  with love and acceptance  whether they deserved it or not. If they acted out  they were punished appropriately  and if they looked dangerous  they were diverted to activities where they could do no harm.
That's what fathering is all about  and that is what the ancient phrase "in loco parentis" means.  Cruz  should have been effectively disciplined from childhood onward  but  he  was allowed to grow into a raging menace  recognized by other students and by numerous adults.

Answer: Cruz told everybody: 'I'm a killer!'


Question: As a congressman   Mick Mulvaney  sponsored legislation to abolish the CFPB  and he still doesn't speak very highly of the agency he's leading. Speaking on CBS' Face the Nation   Mulvaney  said the CFPB "has no accountability to Congress. It is perhaps the most unaccountable bureau or agency there is."
 He  said  he  wants to run the agency "with a good deal of humility and prudence." But critics say  Mulvaney  is not being humble   he 's being reckless.
Under  Mulvaney   the bureau has put on hold new regulations for high-interest payday lenders. And it's dropped an investigation into a a payday lender that contributed to Mulvaney's campaign when he was in Congress.  Mulvaney  has said  he  doesn't think those contributions create a conflict of interest.
And now  Mulvaney  has proposed steep budget cuts.  He  says  he 's not "gutting" the agency  but Democrats vow they won't take the move sitting down.
"We will fight any effort to defund the CFPB " says Sen. Chris Van Hollen  D-Md. Van Hollen pressed  Mulvaney  in a hearing this week about the agency head's decision to drop a lawsuit against an online lender called Golden Valley. The lawsuit said the lender is charging illegal and predatory interest rates.
Van Hollen says an NPR report this week prompted him to start looking into the lender. That report said  Mulvaney  dropped the lawsuit even though the entire professional career staff at the bureau wanted to press ahead with the case.
Van Hollen says he wants a full accounting from  Mulvaney  about why he did that. "It's pretty clear right now  if left to their own devices  Mulvany and the Trump administration will essentially turn the keys to the agency over to the very people who are cheating consumers " Van Hollen says.
The CFPB gets its funding from the Federal Reserve  not Congress. But if  Mulvaney  tries to slash  its  budget  Mike Calhoun of the Center for Responsible Lending says Congress could act to block the move.

Answer: CFPB Under Fire: Trump Budget Would Slash Funding For Consumer Protection Bureau : NPR


Question: Close video For all the hype  Nunes memo delivers sad trombone for  Trump  Rachel Maddow points out that despite two weeks of Fox News hype  the Nunes memo is not only underwhelming as a political stunt  it actually undermines the argument it was meant to make for  Donald Trump . share tweet email save Embed
It’s genuinely difficult to find an angle to the House Republicans’ “Nunes memo” that helps its intended beneficiary:  Donald Trump . Every key argument the president and  his  allies hoped to advance has fallen apart   and after weeks of over-the-top hype  Republicans are actually worse off than they were before the previously classified materials were released to the public.
5.  Trump ’s grammar  use of quotation marks  and capitalization of random words is bizarre for an American adult in a position of authority.
In early March   Trump  told the public that  he ’d “just found out” that former President Obama illegally tapped his phones at Trump Tower before the presidential election. “This is Nixon/Watergate ” the Republican said. “Bad (or sick) guy!”
As regular readers may recall  two weeks later  as it became clear that the confused president had relied on a nonsensical report from a right-wing website   Trump  nevertheless told reporters he felt “somewhat” vindicated about his conspiracy theory  thanks to support from House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes (R-Calif.).
 Trump   of course  hadn’t been vindicated. On the contrary  his entire conspiracy theory had been thoroughly discredited  and he accused his predecessor of a felony for no reason. But in the president’s mind  it was clear he’d been right from the start.
And nearly a year later  here we are again  watching  Trump  once again claim vindication  reality be damned.

Answer:
Despite reality  Trump boasts about being 'totally' vindicated