In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine the neutral choice based on your inference from the statement and your commonsense knowledge. The neutral choice is a sentence that neither agrees nor disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3', corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence. If sentence X agrees with sentence Y, one's correctness follows from the other one. If sentence X disagrees with sentence Y, they can not be correct at the same time.

[EX Q]: Statement: and that's that's in a year that's uh what would you do with all that money Choices: 1. That's a small quantity of money. 2. What would you do with all that money? A million dollars is a lot. 3. That's in a year. What would you do with all that money?
[EX A]: 2

[EX Q]: Statement: The Times claimed that the number boycotting never reached a critical mass that would have threatened the integrity of its list. Choices: 1. The boycotting was so severe that the list's integrity was completely destroyed in the process. 2. The boycotting was arranged by an opposing firm that did not believe in the integrity of the list.  3. The integrity of the list could be compromised by boycotting.
[EX A]: 2

[EX Q]: Statement: From the nation's perspective, if current generations forgo saving for their retirement costs, they also forgo investment opportunities and the economic growth that would result. Choices: 1. Current generations not only miss out on profiting from investment opportunities, but they do not participate fully in national economic growth when they refuse to save for retirement. 2. Not saving for their retirement is the best thing current workers can do for the economy. 3. By not putting away money for retirement, current workers are ignoring opportunities to grow their money and to contribute to economic growth.
[EX A]:
1