Given a passage with a context and an answer, construct a question on the basis of the information present in the passage. Construct the question in such a way that (i) it is unambiguous, (ii) it is answerable from the passage, (iii) its answer is unique (iv) it answer uses text phrases from the passage. Avoid creating questions that (i) can't be answered correctly without actually understanding the passage and (ii) uses the same words or phrases given in the passage.

[Q]: Context: A growing body of evidence supports the notion that MicroRNAs (miRNAs) function as key regulators of tumorigenesis. In the present study, the expression and roles of miRNA-361-5p were explored in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).', 'Quantitative real-time PCR was used to detect the expression miR-361-5p in HCC tissues and pair-matched adjacent normal tissues. MTT and BrdU assays were used to identify the role of miR-361-5p in the regulation of proliferation and invasion of HCC cells. Using bioinformatics analysis, luciferase reporter assays and Western blots were used to identify the molecular target of miR-361-5p. nude mice were used to detect the anti-tumor role of miR-361-5p in vivo.', 'miR-361-5p was down-regulated in HCC tissues in comparison to adjacent normal tissues, due to hypermethylation at its promoter region. Overexpression of miR-361-5p suppressed proliferation and invasion of HCC cells. Chemokine (C-X-C Motif) receptor 6 (CXCR6) was identified as a target of miR-361-5p. Indeed, knockdown of CXCR6 photocopied, while overexpression of CXCR6 largely attenuated the anti-proliferative effect of miR-361-5p. More importantly, in vivo studies demonstrated that forced expression of miR-361-5p significantly inhibited tumor growth in the nude mice.
Answer: Our results indicate that miR-361-5p acts as a tumor suppressor and might serve as a novel therapeutic target for the treatment of HCC patients.
[A]: Does microRNA-361-5p inhibit Cancer Cell Growth by Targeting CXCR6 in Hepatocellular Carcinoma?


[Q]: Context: Central core disease is a congenital myopathy, characterized by presence of central core-like areas in muscle fibers. Patients have mild or moderate weakness, hypotonia and motor developmental delay. The disease is caused by mutations in the human ryanodine receptor gene (RYR1), which encodes a calcium-release channel. Since the RYR1 gene is huge, containing 106 exons, mutation screening has been limited to three 'hot spots', with particular attention to the C-terminal region. Recent next-generation sequencing methods are now identifying multiple numbers of variants in patients, in which interpretation and phenotype prevision is difficult.", "In a Brazilian Caucasian family, clinical, histopathological and molecular analysis identified a new case of central core disease in a 48-year female. Sanger sequencing of the C-terminal region of the RYR1 gene identified two different missense mutations: c.14256 A >\u2009C polymorphism in exon 98 and c.14693 T >\u2009C in exon 102, which have already been described as pathogenic. Trans-position of the 2 mutations was confirmed because patient's daughter, mother and sister carried only the exon 98's mutation, a synonymous variant that was subsequently found in the frequency of 013-0,05 of alleles. Further next generation sequencing study of the whole RYR1 gene in the patient revealed the presence of additional 5 common silent polymorphisms in homozygosis and 8 polymorphisms in heterozygosis.
Answer: Considering that patient's relatives showed no pathologic phenotype, and the phenotype presented by the patient is within the range observed in other central core disease patients with the same mutation, it was concluded that the c.14256 A > C polymorphism alone is not responsible for disease, and the associated additional silent polymorphisms are not acting as modifiers of the primary pathogenic mutation in the affected patient. The case described above illustrates the present reality where new methods for wide genome screening are becoming more accessible and able to identify a great variety of mutations and polymorphisms of unknown function in patients and their families.
[A]: Do silent polymorphisms in the RYR1 gene modify the phenotype of the p.4898 I > T pathogenic mutation in central core disease : a case report?


[Q]: Context: The aim of this study was to evaluate post-tetanic potentiation of muscle twitch in myasthenia gravis (MG).', 'Post-tetanic potentiation was evaluated by recording the compound muscle action potential (CMAP) of abductor pollicis brevis and movement-related potential (MRP) of the thumb using an accelerometer after tetanic stimulation of the median nerve at the wrist. After baseline recording, tetanic stimulation was delivered to the median nerve at a frequency of 10 Hz for 10s. The CMAP and MRP were successively recorded at baseline and at 5, 10, 30, 60, 90 and 120 s after tetanic stimulation. The chronological changes of CMAPs and MRPs were recorded bilaterally in 11 patients with MG, 9 patients with myopathies (disease controls), and 25 healthy control subjects.', 'Maximal acceleration of MRP was significantly elevated during 10s after tetanic stimulation without any CMAP changes in all groups. However, statistical analysis detected a significant decrease in post-tetanic potentiation of maximal acceleration of MRP in MG patients only compared to healthy controls, but not in myopathy patients, which may imply impairment of excitation-contraction coupling in MG.
Answer: Post-tetanic potentiation of muscle twitch is significantly diminished in MG, suggesting impaired excitation-contraction coupling.
[A]:
Do impaired post-tetanic potentiation of muscle twitch in myasthenia gravis?