In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine the neutral choice based on your inference from the statement and your commonsense knowledge. The neutral choice is a sentence that neither agrees nor disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3', corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence. If sentence X agrees with sentence Y, one's correctness follows from the other one. If sentence X disagrees with sentence Y, they can not be correct at the same time.
--------
Question: Statement: During a NewsHour discussion of Vernon Jordan's testimony, Shields comes out with the bizarrely malapropos comment that Vernon Jordan's elocutionary style reminds him of nothing more than Barbara Jordan's measured diction. Choices: 1. Shields says something about Vernon Jordan that has no bearing on the proceedings. 2. In a moment of senile dementia, Shields loses the plot when speaking about Jordan. 3. During the discussion, Shields flew about the room and perched on the window sill.

Answer: 2


Question: Statement: well that's pretty um i've talked about camping with someone i've talked about the weather Choices: 1. I've never wanted to go camping with anyone, I'm uninterested in the weather 2. I've talked about weather and about going camping with someone 3. I've talked about camping with someone, but only as long as the weather is good. 

Answer: 3


Question: Statement: Auditors can reduce the direct tests of the data if they test the effectiveness of general and application controls over computer-processed data, and these tests support the conclusion that the controls are effective. Choices: 1. Auditors can interfere with data. 2. Auditors are not allowed to reduce direct tests of data. 3. Auditors are allowed to reduce direct tests of data if they do test the effectiveness of general and application controls. 

Answer:
1