We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gay Marriage) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gay marriage. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gay marriage.

Example Input: Yet the law will be upheld because it is a rational means of advancing the state interest in protecting persons from fraudulent or unscrupulous insurance agents.
Example Output: Valid

Example Input: I personally find the equal protection clause of the 14th amendment to be a more compelling basis for the guarantee of equality under the law than the hazy doctrine of substantive due process.
Example Output: Valid

Example Input: To say "I want marriage to be broadened to include MY union" when your union doesn't fit the definition is to say you want marriage to be a broadenable institution to begin with.
Example Output:
Valid