In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: threat and non-threat. Threat is a statement that someone will be hurt or harmed, especially if the person does not do something in particular.

[EX Q]: Comment: This is what I can't understand about Trump's followers, William. It is not about his policies, to the extent that he has any. What I don't understand is that you're willing to believe every story told by her enemies about one candidate, even though she's been cleared by all the congressional committees and agencies that investigated her; but you're not willing to believe Donald Trump when he tells you with his own mouth precisely what kind of man he is. He has told you that he is a sexual abuser, in his own words; that he enjoys mocking handicapped people and characterizing people by the ethnic group that they belong to; that he likes to see violent eruptions in his campaign rallies; that he loves war, wonders why he can't use nuclear weapons. These are not stories told by others (although others have confirmed them) but by his own mouth. Yet you won't believe him, but you will believe stories told by her enemies about Hillary Clinton?
[EX A]: Non-threat

[EX Q]: Comment: Muslims need culling, they breed like mice and won't use birth control.
[EX A]: Threat

[EX Q]: Comment: While there are small time bootleggers in places without bars or liquor stores in poor black communities, the end of alcohol prohibition ended violent gangs who based their existence on alcohol prohibition.  End drug prohibition and violence goes away.  Legalize prostitution and pimps go away.  Legalize abortion and back alley operators go away.  Lower cigarette taxes and smugglers go away.  Respect the principle of unanimity in legislating morality and you don't need a police state (assuming you quit using the state and landlords to keep blacks and hispanics in their place).
[EX A]:
Non-threat