In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine the neutral choice based on your inference from the statement and your commonsense knowledge. The neutral choice is a sentence that neither agrees nor disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3', corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence. If sentence X agrees with sentence Y, one's correctness follows from the other one. If sentence X disagrees with sentence Y, they can not be correct at the same time.

[Q]: Statement: which surprised me that that uh through the jury discussion they were able to convince him against his original opinion so maybe that speaks well for juries Choices: 1. Jury discussions never change anyone's opinions.  2. Jury discussions often result in people changing their original opinions.  3. Through jury discussion, they were able to convince him to abandon his original opinion; perhaps that speaks well of juries. 
[A]: 2


[Q]: Statement: Postal density appears to be a more important driver of unit street delivery costs than volume over the actual ranges in France and the U.S. Choices: 1. France and U.S. have similar unit street delivery costs because they have similar policies. 2. Postal density appears to be a less important driver of unit street delivery cost than volume over the actual ranges in France and the U.S. 3. Postal density seems to be an important driver of unit street delivery costs in France and the U.S.
[A]: 1


[Q]: Statement: Within the ED, there are even higher case rates in subgroups. Choices: 1. There are many lower case rates in subgroups within the ED. 2. There are no case rats in the subgroups within the ED. 3. There are higher case rates in subgroups within the ED.
[A]:
1