Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.

Q: Wow. Congratulations, Ms. Monahan. You have just been played by some of the wealthiest white families in Portland. With fair and balanced reporting like this, who needs Fox News?

The mexican sombrero here conveys so much about where this article comes from (sure, all Latinos are basically Mexican, right?... or is it Olympic athletes?). It's the same insidious racism that has John101 talking about people putting on "fake accents", and prompted some parents to suggest that Latino nannies had been paid to show up in support of keeping Ainsworth neighborhood and Spanish Immersion programs integrated at the same school (as they've been successfully for 30 years). Both untrue.

Let's not forgot how displacing the Spanish Immersion program from Ainsworth got on the table: As a rushed and desperate 11th hour response when families in Council Crest, Healy Heights and Greenhills neighborhoods had their children and homes considered by PPS for redistricting to other schools.

Hypocrisy, indeeed.

A: No
****
Q: Wow. You lived here 36 years and all you've heard is tax, tax, tax? I've lived here 60 years and since the pipeline I haven't heard a peep about taxes. Until our current situation brought on by the low price of oil and the republican legislature over spending. See the LIO  for an example. But as long as the republican legislature keeps PP out of the classroom and guns in it, blah blah blah.

A: No
****
Q: I was shocked to see this change in the official results! I can't believe that there was ever 88 Clinton supporters outside when the counting was taking place. I'm looking at the photos I took throughout the process and I don't see that many people. They told us the count was 352 to 69. This seems really shady...

A:
Yes
****