In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine the neutral choice based on your inference from the statement and your commonsense knowledge. The neutral choice is a sentence that neither agrees nor disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3', corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence. If sentence X agrees with sentence Y, one's correctness follows from the other one. If sentence X disagrees with sentence Y, they can not be correct at the same time.

[EX Q]: Statement: 'Wouldn't that be extremely dangerous?' Choices: 1. I was concerned about the dangers involved.  2. That seems to be the safest route.  3. Would that not be hazardous?
[EX A]: 1

[EX Q]: Statement: Julius nodded, and continued: " 'How did it happen?'   Choices: 1. Julius shaked his head screamed "I know how everything happened.' 2. 'How did the accident happen?' said Julius. 3. How did it happen?' Said Julius while nodding.
[EX A]: 2

[EX Q]: Statement: In short, the success of macroeconomic activism, in both theory and practice, has made it possible for free market microeconomics to survive--again both in theory and in practice. Choices: 1. The success of macroeconomic activism has helped free market microeconomics survive. 2. Free market microeconomics has not survived. 3. Macroeconomic activism has brought attention to free market microeconomics.
[EX A]:
3