In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.
--------
Question: Comment: Until this denomination starts to heal its own divisions, don't attempt to foist your dysfunction on the rest of society.

Out, out, damned spot!

Answer: Obscene


Question: Comment: It wasn't just Democrats that voted for Sanders, Kearon, there were a lot of Republicans in Democrat clothing sneaking into caucuses to vote.

Answer: Non-obscene


Question: Comment: I'm not convinced that the STASI, or the GDR government, was really willing to supply weapons to the South Africans. You must not forget that the STASI had strong relations with the Cuban intelligence service. Manuel Noriega on the other hand was also involved with the Cubans at that time (that was one of the reasons for his rift with the US-Americans, since he was also on the CIA payroll, but played a double-game). Also, the STASI and the Soviets knew that those weapons would have been employed against a) the Soviet military advisers, b) the Cuban brigades and c) the MPLA allies in Angola. My guess is that STASI contacted the Cubans and the Cubans conspired with Noriega to seize the freight. I wouldn't be surprised if Noriega then sold the cargo to the CIA. Everyone benefited from the deal, only the Boers got fucked.

Answer:
Obscene