We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

[Q]: Sent1: If they know they'll die if caught, they'll likely kill more rape victims and children.
 Sent2: If a person wasn't convicted then they surely wouldn't be murdered by the state.
[A]: Not similar


[Q]: Sent1: A death penalty case is likely to be appealed as high as it will be taken.
 Sent2: Death penalty cases involve a lot of appeals and them lawyers are really expensive.
[A]: Similar


[Q]: Sent1: If we continue to allow the death penalty, we are no better than the murderers and rapists that we punish with the death penalty.
 Sent2: If we fail to execute murderers, and doing so would in fact have deterred other murders, we have allowed the killing of a bunch of innocent victims.
[A]:
Not similar