The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the small-talk strategy, otherwise output No. small-talk is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used for discussing topics apart from the negotiation, in an attempt to build a rapport with the opponent. For example, discussing how the opponent is doing during the pandemic or sharing excitement for the camping trip.

Context: 'Water is a little important to us too though , if possible maybe we can split that or maybe we can get some more food in replacement.' 'That may be possible.... 🙂 What did you have in mind for the food replacement? ' 'You can have all the water if we can have all the food?'
Utterance: 'I dont think I am okay with that ☹️. Food is essential to our groups morale when camping. We would like 1 additional food preferably.'
No

Context: 'Hm. Getting warmer. What do you need the most of? ' 'I need more water than the other options, you can keep 2 food and 2 firewood but 1 water' 'I also feel that water is the most important. How about I take all 3 water, and you can take 2 firewood, and 2 foods?'
Utterance: 'I think the fairest thing would be that you keep 1 water, 2 food, 2 firewood'
No

Context: 'Would you consider letting me have 2 of the 3 extra firewood?  I have health issues and I get really cold sometimes.☹️' 'Yes, I think that would be very fair, since I don't have health issues myself. Would you allow me to have 2 of the 3 food items? I need energy for hiking. 🙂' 'That would be perfect.  I am a gourmet cook and if you would like me to help you prepare the evening meal, I would be very happy too.🙂'
Utterance: 'That's so nice of you! I would be delighted to have some great meals during this camping vacay. 🙂🙂'

Yes