TASK DEFINITION: In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence can be inferred from the statement. Incorrect choices change the meaning in important ways or have details that are not mentioned in the statement. Indicate your answer as 1,2, or 3 corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.
PROBLEM: Statement: if the racial make up of the group was such and such you know they'd have to do that percentage of work and what is perceived to be that part of town and you know all this kind of thing Choices:  1. You would understand if you knew the racial percentages 2. You can only have an opinon if you know about the racial divide 3. You don't need to know about race to have an opinion

SOLUTION: 1

PROBLEM: Statement: In addition, with knowledge of existing components, it can focus attention on maturing the new content, the higher risk element of the new product. Choices:  1. New content can be more easily developed once knowledge of existing components is established. 2. Developing new product is always a high risk venture. 3. Having an understanding of existing components detracts from focus that should be spent on developing new product.

SOLUTION: 1

PROBLEM: Statement: In fact, the Vice Presidentas Counsel has already informed the House Committee on Energy and Commerce and the House Committee on Government Reform, that the meetings the support staff and other NEPDG members had were to gather information relevant to the NEPDGas work and were not deliberative in Choices:  1. The meetings were to get the committee to write a new bill. 2. The meetings were to gather information about NEPDGas work. 3. The meetings were to gather information about NEPDGas work and not to persuade the committee to act in a certain way.

SOLUTION:
2