In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: threat and non-threat. Threat is a statement that someone will be hurt or harmed, especially if the person does not do something in particular.

Q: Comment: "What you are saying is that anyone can be given a rifle and some bullets and they can go out and kill someone who is supposedly protected like the President of the United States."
Nailed it.
I've done plenty of reading on the Kennedy assassination. Oswald fired from an upper floor of a building. He had a clear shot.
One out of every ten presidents has died from a violent act at the hands of ordinary human beings.

A: Threat
****
Q: Comment: Sadly in rural Alaska, particularly in Southwest Alaska due to SB91, there is nonexistent prosecution for SA. I have seen SA1, penetration without consent, dropped to harrassment. No kidding. Get raped, the guy gets out in six weeks. It is done to protect the sexual offenders from having sex crimes on their records. And only once in 40 years have I seen someone prosecuted on the 3-strikes your out sex law. You can have all the laws on the books you want, but if the DA's, Public Defenders and judges collude to NOT prosecute, what are you going to do?

A: Non-threat
****
Q: Comment: Cool, let's go shoot more sh*t!!!

A:
Threat
****