instruction:
In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence can be inferred from the statement. Incorrect choices change the meaning in important ways or have details that are not mentioned in the statement. Indicate your answer as 1,2, or 3 corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.
question:
Statement: Staring at a computer screen all day, pretending to be busy--it was Choices:  1. Glued on to the computer screen all day and pretending to do work. 2. Glued to the computer screen all day, working his fingers to the bone. 3. Getting paid for not doing anything at all.
answer:
1


question:
Statement: And it implies that the Harlem racket reverted to local control. Choices:  1. This shows us that the Harlem racket is under national control again. 2. That shows us that the Harlem racket is under local control. 3. We got what we wanted - the Harlem racket is under local control again.
answer:
2


question:
Statement: (Since Nike doesn't make ice-skating equipment, that's the closest Knight could come to subsidizing that sport's biggest asshole.) Choices:  1. Nike makes great equipment for ice-skating. 2. Nike doesn't make equipment for ice-skating but Adidas does. 3. Nike doesn't make equipment for ice-skating.
answer:

3