The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the self-need strategy, otherwise output No. self-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to create a personal need for an item in the negotiation, such as by pointing out that the participant sweats a lot to show preference towards water packages.
--------
Question: Context: 'I can't give out all the water. I need to be hydrated as well. ' 'You already have all the basics, though, so you won't lack sufficient water to be hydrated. I have a serious medical condition that requires that I have access to additional water. ' 'The maximum bundle I can give is all packages of food + 1 package of water'
Utterance: 'Sorry, that won't work for me. I've already said that I have a medical condition that requires additional water. You do not need that much water just to be hydrated -- you already have basic water. I can give you all of the firewood, but I need all of the water. '

Answer: Yes


Question: Context: 'Well, I do need some of each, what about I take 3 food and 1 each of the other two?' 'I don't mind taking 2 of the water as I need it for a medical condition and 2 firewood however I would like to get 1 of the food.' 'You need water the most?'
Utterance: 'I am constantly thirsty and having water on hand is needed. Why is gathering food an issue for you?'

Answer: Yes


Question: Context: ' I would agree to that if I can also have two things of firewood. I am going to need a lot of wood, so I can cook the meals I am making 🙂' 'I completely understand, thank you for compromising with water and food. Wished we had 4 firewoods to divide and share it equaly, may I ask how long will you be camping for? Im afraid I need 2 firewoods as well, maybe we can see who has the greater need? ' 'I am going to be camping for a couple of weeks, so I will need quite a bit. I also realized some additional water would be good, because I have some meals that need me to boil water. Maybe you can have 2 firewood in exchange for me having one of your waters? Then you would still have plenty of water, but also plenty of firewood 🙂'
Utterance: 'So sorry, I just realized you did not agree to the 3 waters in exchange of 3 foods. if you want a water, i will also will need one food. just to make things more fair on my end. If not i am looking at 2 waters, 0 foods, and 1 firewood. But i am willing to compromise for 3 waters, 1 firewood, and 0 foods. and you'll get 3 foods, 2 firewoods, and 0 waters, what do you think?'

Answer:
No