We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Q: Sent1: Not to mention that the death penalty is more costly than simple life in prison in both money and time.
 Sent2: Back to reality, we convict the wrong person all the time, and we've set up a system where death penalty is actually more expensive than life in prison.

A: Similar
****
Q: Sent1: Even if the death penalty does not deter serial killers, it prevents them from killing again in society or in prison.
 Sent2: If the death penalty deters murder (as you claim) then why does Europe have a lower murder rate even though they've outlawed the death penalty?

A: Not similar
****
Q: Sent1: The death penalty is an act of justice, yes justice, which while unable to supplement for the losses of others, can secure the isolation of a convicted criminal and also deliver a punishment for the crime.
 Sent2: That should be a crime which should result in the death penalty.

A:
Not similar
****