In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Example Input: Comment: Bowl of Dicks would make an excellent new name for Dunn Hall!
Example Output: Sexual-explicit

Example Input: Comment: And I can give you a whole history down through the centuries with popes, cardinals, bishops and priests who had sex with women, girls, and boys----they didn't care which. 
 

Because Pope Sixtus IV [1471-84] collected church tax on prostitutes and charged priests for keeping mistresses, it's believed that this was what increased the clerical homosexuality---not being homosexual.
Example Output: Sexual-explicit

Example Input: Comment: Luckily Trump will shut this idiot up once and for all.
Lord knows Junior can't. 
Platitudes, climate change rhetoric along with a few epithets won't take out your enemy.
Maybe Junior could carbon tax kim juck muck to oblivion like he is doing to us.

Saturday Night Live needs an MC -  kim juck muck would do fine
Example Output:
Non-sexual-explicit