In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

[Q]: Comment: It's the Republican ethos--"just grab 'em by the pussy"--and the rich get what they want at the expense of everything and everyone else.
[A]: Sexual-explicit


[Q]: Comment: Sounds like McComas had a few priors but the theft was the only prior that left a victim. He might have tried something stupid that angered the cop. Freedom of information absolutely should be available as soon as it is discovered, for anyone to study. I'm not saying the police are corrupt but they do protect each other. What I fear is the concept of "We have conducted a thorough internal investigation and find no wrong doing on the part of the officer"
[A]: Non-sexual-explicit


[Q]: Comment: Why don't you explain to me the evolutionary value of a man sticking his penis in another man's bum and how whatever value you can find offsets the potential for anatomical damage and infection that it creates.  Seems to me that that is what makes the inclination and learned behavior in response intrinsically disordered.
[A]:
Sexual-explicit