Given a paragraph about movies and a set of conversational questions and answers about the paragraph, say whether the passage contains sufficient information to answer the follow-up question. Say Yes if it is answerable; otherwise, say No. The paragraph has the prefix 'CONTEXT:'. Each conversation question has a prefix `Q:` followed by the answer prefix `A:`, and the follow-up question has a prefix `FOLLOWUP_Q:`.

Example Input: CONTEXT: If snowballs and Twinkies still survive, then I would presume that there was also plenty of tinned and dried food to be found in shops and warehouses. I'm also fairly sure that, despite the zombies, there was plenty of electricity (the movie doesn't make clear whether this is from local generators or from the grid, but there is clearly electricity in many scenes including the theme park at the end) so frozen food will still be available. It is not a serious movie and it would probably be petty to point out the inconsistency of the existence of network power in a world dominated by zombies where nobody is running the power plants or maintaining the grid. It certainly didn't detract from my enjoyment of the movie.  <sep>  Q: What do main characters survive on during the zombie apocalypse?
Example Output: Yes

Example Input: CONTEXT: Because his father taught him not to involve in any (true loving) relationship in their line of work. Nicky knew they both fell truly for each other, so he decide to leave her for the sake of both of them. At the end scene, his father can be seen saying these things, and because of that mistake (losing focus) he took all his earned/stolen money.  <sep>  Q: Why did Nicky do what he did to Jess in New Orleans? A: Nicky knew they both fell truly for each other, so he decide to leave her for the sake of both of them  Q: I still don't understand why he would do that? A: Because his father taught him not to involve in any (true loving) relationship in their line of work  Q: Why did his father get involved? A: At the end scene, his father can be seen saying these things, and because of that mistake (losing focus) he took all his earned/stolen money  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Oh, so they were involved in something illegal?
Example Output: Yes

Example Input: CONTEXT: He made that rock formation himself to catch fish. The arrangement of rocks into that shape is a traditional fishing technique called a fishing weir. Quite a few Native American tribes used this kind of fishing technique to catch freshwater fish. The rock formation forces the fish swimming downstream into a small area where they can't easily escape, and can be grabbed by the person fishing. From what I've read, it's actually not likely that a real fisherman would have used a weir in such a shallow stream; in those cases you could typically just grab the fish by hand as they swam in front of you. Nonetheless, it is a valid fishing technique in other cases.  <sep>  Q: Did someone arrange rocks in a U shape? A: Quite a few Native American tribes used this kind of fishing technique to catch freshwater fish  Q: What is the purpose of arranging the rocks this way? A: The rock formation forces the fish swimming downstream into a small area where they can't easily escape, and can be grabbed by the person fishing  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: How high do you have to make the formation?
Example Output:
No