Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
--------
Question: ya know ...I think that is a pretty accurate, concise assessment.  it is why the campaign agenda/promises are never fully carried out if at all.

Answer: No


Question: there is no way I would reveal my name or actual identity.  I am not afraid of being held accountable for what I say - they are my opinions, good or bad.  but , there are too many nutjobs out there and it is amazing what can be done with one piece of info, a computer and a vengeful person.   seeing the wildly different opinions and how radical some are....no way I want anyone, either side that radical, knocking on my door.  gary crum puts himself out there and I admire his transparency and bravery.  but I always get a quick hit of anxiety  when i see it and think hope he stays ok.

Answer: No


Question: I completely understand the frustration Mr. Sharpless.    The public is going to get two candidates, both of which can and should be considered part of the 1%.   While I'm pretty sure the Clintons accumulated wealth doesn't match Trump's, their circle of influence in definitely world wide and continues through the Clinton foundation work.   

The life of Mr. Trump has always had great privilege thanks to his family wealth and association, and he had continued to build wealth through  his investments.   Anyone who expects Mr. Trump to help legislation that would curb his wealth, tax breaks, rules of bankruptcy,  must be forgetting we're talking about Mr. Trumps life work and the benefits that he gets from that work.

If you're concerned about a financial/political oligarchy that shapes American policy, I don't think either candidate is going to be very satisfying.

Answer:
Yes