We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

Ex Input:
Indeed, the right to keep and bear arms���which we have explained pre-existed, and therefore was preserved by, the Second Amendment���was subject to restrictions at common law.

Ex Output:
Valid


Ex Input:
Therefore, having a gun doesn't automatically afford protection... the burglar could be armed, better armed, or with accomplicies better armed.

Ex Output:
Valid


Ex Input:
Your entire approach is akin to trying to hold bank robbers to jaywalking laws.

Ex Output:

Valid