TASK DEFINITION: In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine the neutral choice based on your inference from the statement and your commonsense knowledge. The neutral choice is a sentence that neither agrees nor disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3', corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence. If sentence X agrees with sentence Y, one's correctness follows from the other one. If sentence X disagrees with sentence Y, they can not be correct at the same time.
PROBLEM: Statement: Why not just abolish all the laws that are supposed to protect These folk; because if you do not have legal services, the laws are unenforceable and useless. Choices: 1. These folk need legal services to protect them. 2. There is no way to enforce the laws with no legal services. 3. The people can protect themselves against the law.

SOLUTION: 1

PROBLEM: Statement: A regulator might well be required to administer any price caps, incremental-cost floors, or other restrictions. Choices: 1. A regulator must administer various tasks, despite most seeing them as useless. 2. A regulator does nothing of note. 3. A regulator must administer various tasks.

SOLUTION: 1

PROBLEM: Statement: In Take This Simple Test, Steven E. Landsburg goes into quite some mathematical detail about the public's so-called irrationality. Choices: 1. Steven E. Landsburg believes the general public is the epitome of rationality. 2. Author Steven E. Landsburg writes about his subjects with mathematical precision. 3. Steven E. Landsburg writes about the supposed irrationality of the public in his book.

SOLUTION:
2