Given a document, an entity and its sentiment towards the entity, verify if it is the correct sentiment towards the entity. Answer should be yes or no. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

[Q]: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Donald J. Trump is Positive . But  President Donald J. Trump  hardly looked like a grand wizard a week ago today. On January 8   he  hosted Alveda King  the niece of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.; Isaac Newton Farris Jr.  Dr. King’s nephew  and Bruce Levell of the National Diversity Coalition for  Trump . All three of  Trump ’s guests are black.
“I did about 200 cataract surgeries with a group of surgeons in Haiti and the same in Central America ” Senator Paul  an ophthalmologist  said on NBC’s Meet the Press yesterday. “And when we asked  Donald J. Trump  as a private citizen to support those trips   he  was a large financial backer of both medical mission trips.” Paul continued: “I think it’s unfair then to sort of all of a sudden paint him  ‘Oh well   he ’s a racist ’ when I know  for a fact  that  he  cares very deeply about the people in Haiti because  he  helped finance a trip where we were able to get vision back for 200 people in Haiti.”
Whatever  Trump  said or didn’t say  the reaction has been beyond incendiary  with the words “racist” and “racism” erupting like volcanos around the Pacific Ring of Fire.
 Trump’s  alleged language  if uttered  was unfortunate  vulgar  and unpresidential  although  he  hardly would have been the first chief executive to use profanity in office.  His  supposed words apparently were aimed at sh**hole nations  rather than sh**hole people. The latter would have been inexcusable.
It is widely understood that certain nations are garden spots  and others are not. It is fair to say that Haiti  El Salvador  and a tragically high number of African countries are non-garden spots. It also is perfectly appropriate to ask whether America would be better off with immigrants from such impoverished and embattled places or from prosperous nations  such as Norway  which  Trump  reportedly mentioned. It likely was top of mind  given Norwegian prime minister Erna Solberg’s visit and joint press conference with him on Wednesday.
Whatever he stated or didn’t   President Trump  should learn these lessons from this experience  and repeat them to  himself  daily:
“Every word I say matters.” This is true in public  in private  and around the clock  until  he  leaves the White House and begins work on the Donald J. Trump Presidential Library.
 Trump  should think of  himself  as Jim Carrey in the 1998 film The Truman Show. Except when  he  is in bed   Trump  should behave as if every breath  he  takes were being broadcast live around the globe.
 Trump  needs to remember that Democrats are not  his  pals. They almost universally crave  his  failure  resist  his  program  and want to yank  him  from office — never mind the 304 votes  he  legitimately won in the Electoral College. Anything  he  says in front of Democrats (and even some Never  Trump  Republicans  alas) can and will be used against  him  in the court of public opinion.  Senator Durbin  should be condemned for publicizing (or distorting)  his  private conversation with  Trump   thus sabotaging efforts to reach a DACA deal. But this should be no more shocking than if  somewhere in Illinois  a rooster crowed at dawn.
 Trump  needs to remember that Democrats are not  his  pals.
Ned Ryun of American Majority has an excellent idea: Whenever  President Trump  meets with Democrats   he  should summon news cameras and let them stay until Democrats leave. Trump displayed his leadership skills to almost universal applause when he allowed the media to broadcast live for 55 minutes from the Cabinet Room  as he negotiated immigration and border security last Tuesday. Doing this regularly when Democrats are around will prevent them from offering journalists an alternative version of events. With cameras present  Trump should be on his best behavior. And the American people will benefit from Senate-floor-like transparency inside the White House. This would be unprecedented and gain Trump considerable respect for opening a virtual sunroof atop the West Wing.
Trump’s job is to recall at all times  with the relentlessness of a bloodhound chasing an escaped Death Row inmate  that he must not give free knives and anvils to people who hate his guts and literally would cheer if he woke up dead tomorrow morning . (And the Left need not bother to deny this. Everyone knows this is true  as evidenced by the Left’s repeated fantasies about Trump being shot  stabbed  and decapitated.) These people would call  Trump  a racist for ordering vanilla ice cream.  He  should remember this without fail and act accordingly.
If  Trump  becomes blurry about this fact   he  should remember the very first fake-news story to emerge on  his  watch. On January 20  during  his  very first day as president  Time magazine’s Zeke Miller reported that Trump removed a bust of Dr. Martin Luther King from the Oval Office. This confirmed that  Trump  was a racist who couldn’t wait to evict that troublemaking black from  his  new office.
[A]: yes


[Q]: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Jamie Dimon is Negative . Bitcoin's price has fully recovered from  its  recent slump after  JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon  called it a fraud and Chinese regulators cracked down on exchanges.
The cryptocurrency had a drawdown of up to 14% in the 10 days after September 12  when  Dimon  compared it to the tulip bubble of the 1600s and vowed to fire traders who used it.
By Thursday  bitcoin had all of the losses. It was up nearly 2% from the lows on the day  Dimon  spoke  at $4157.31 per coin at 10:28 a.m. ET.
The move illustrates bitcoin's wild volatility; it's gained 331% this year  unheard of for any major currency and most financial assets. It also shows why many Wall Street professionals like  Dimon  don't see it as a legitimate store of value but as a speculative instrument.
[A]: no


[Q]: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Juliet Jacobsen is Neutral . Dr. Thalia Krakower (right)  a primary care physician  gets advice from Dr. Juliet Jacobsen  medical director of the Continuum Project at Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston  during a January training session on how to talk to seriously ill patients about their goals and values. (Melissa Bailey/KHN) (Photo: Melissa Bailey  Kaiser Health News)
Dr. Juliet Jacobsen  medical director of the Continuum Project at Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston  trains primary care doctors in how to talk to patients with serious illnesses about their goals and values. (Melissa Bailey/KHN) (Photo: Melissa Bailey  Kaiser Health News)
At Mass General  Dr. Juliet Jacobsen  a palliative care physician  serves as medical director for the Continuum Project  a large-scale effort to quickly train clinicians to have these conversations  document them and share what they learn with one another. The project ramped up in January with the first session in a series that aims to reach 250 primary care providers at the hospital.
At a recent training session   Jacobsen  gave clinicians a laminated page with scripted language to help them along. When the participants role-played with professional actors  difficulties quickly emerged.
"How long should we let them be silent and sad?" Krakower asked  Jacobsen . "We always step in too soon."
Physicians let patients speak an average 18 seconds before interrupting them  research has found.  Jacobsen  encouraged doctors to allow more silence  and to respond to patientsâ emotions  not just to their words.
The scripted conversation is quite different from what doctors have been trained to do   Jacobsen  acknowledged. It doesn't aim to reach any decision  nor to fill out end-of-life paperwork.
In a pilot at Brigham and Women's Hospital in Boston   Jacobsen  noted  the conversations typically lasted 22 to 26 minutes.
At another moment during role-play   Jacobsen  stepped in when a doctor skipped over the section in the script where she was supposed to share prognostic information.
The topic is avoided for many reasons   Jacobsen  later said: Clinicians' schedules are crammed. They may not want to scare families with a timeline that turns out to be wrong. And they may not know what language to use  especially when the disease trajectory is uncertain.
When a doctorâs message moves abruptly from "everything's great" to "she's dying  " Jacobsen  said  patients and their families don't have enough time to adjust to the bad news.
To address that problem   Jacobsen 's team suggests language that helps clinicians discuss a prognosis without asserting certainty: "I worry the decline we have seen is going to continue " or  "I worry something serious may happen in the next few months."
[A]:
yes