In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: toxic and non-toxic. Toxicity is defiend as anything that is rude, disrespectful, or unreasonable that would make someone want to leave a converation.

[EX Q]: Comment: Well,  you can't ban stupid.
[EX A]: Toxic

[EX Q]: Comment: So another American "tv preacher" is coming to Canada to fill his pockets with cash and breath fire and brimstone....   Christian my ass...  he has about as much to do with the ideas of Jesus as pigs can fly...
[EX A]: Toxic

[EX Q]: Comment: It shouldn’t be surprising that Vladimir Putin would want to interfere in US politics to advance Russia’s foreign policy goals – from curtailing Nato to ending sanctions over the conflict in Ukraine and preserving Bashar Assad’s regime in Syria. 

But what should surprise and disturb is that the Republican party is so vulnerable to Russian interference. The Republican party, traditionally associated with a hawkish stance toward Moscow, threw its support behind a presidential candidate who openly called on Russia to hack his opponent’s campaign.

Majority leader Mitch McConnell told Obama and leading Democrats that he would regard any effort to release evidence of Russian interference before the election as partisan. In other words, he put his own party’s interest in electing Trump ahead of the national interest.
[EX A]:
Non-toxic