Given a paragraph about movies and a set of conversational questions and answers about the paragraph, say whether the passage contains sufficient information to answer the follow-up question. Say Yes if it is answerable; otherwise, say No. The paragraph has the prefix 'CONTEXT:'. Each conversation question has a prefix `Q:` followed by the answer prefix `A:`, and the follow-up question has a prefix `FOLLOWUP_Q:`.

[Q]: CONTEXT: I got the impression Weyland did not want the scientists (especially the two head scientists) to realize his selfish reason for wanting to contact the engineers. He kept them under the impression that he was funding the mission so that mankind could have the knowledge, even faking that he was already dead, the ultimate way to get credibility. If he had been honest and said "I want the engineers to help me live forever" the scientists might not have gone along as he wanted them to. (For example, David suggests Weyland wanted Elizabeth Shaw there as a good-luck charm). Remember the scene where Vickers tells the two scientists that they are not to make contact with the engineers? This is the first hint that Weyland (in the hologram) was lying. Vickers knew Weyland was alive, and knew his true goal, and did not want the scientists to interfere with that goal.  <sep>  Q: Why does Weyland hide that he was on the ship? A: I got the impression Weyland did not want the scientists (especially the two head scientists) to realize his selfish reason for wanting to contact the engineers  Q: What else can you tell me about this? A: If he had been honest and said "I want the engineers to help me live forever" the scientists might not have gone along as he wanted them to  Q: Why wouldn't they go along with it? A: He kept them under the impression that he was funding the mission so that mankind could have the knowledge  Q: Ahh. so he lied to them to get them on his side? A: the ultimate way to get credibility  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: How long was the journey for?
[A]: No


[Q]: CONTEXT: I don't know this for sure, but here is my educated guess. In this featurette they're using the word "hero" to identify the "real world" Nina. There are 2 Nina's in those shots. One is the "hero" (main character of the film, whom the audience identifies with and empathizes with) and then there's the evil reflective Nina (in one shot called the "reflective element"). There's also the green-screen element. Put all of those together, and you get the final comp (comp = composite shot, which is a shot made up of multiple elements).  <sep>  Q: What is a "hero plate"?
[A]: Yes


[Q]: CONTEXT: At the beginning of the Back to Earth special, we see Lister reading to a memorial to Kochanski, with the implication being that she is dead. Later in the special, the kids Lister talks to on the bus talk about the events of "Series 9", which was never actually written, shot, or aired. They tell him that Kryten lied about Kochanski being sucked out of an airlock. The truth, according to the kids, is that she was tired of watching Lister wasting his life drinking and went off on her own in Blue Midget. Kryten told Lister she had died in order to spare his feelings (or perhaps because he was jealous of Lister's feelings for Kochanski). At the end of the Back To Earth specials, Lister resists the hallucinated Kochanski, saying that he knows that the real her is out there somewhere and that he intends to find her.  <sep>  Q: What happened to Kochanski between season 8 and 10 of Red Dwarf?
[A]:
Yes