We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

Example Input: Do you think that a gun-ban in the long run would mean that more criminals get their hands on guns or that less criminals get their hands on guns?
Example Output: Valid

Example Input: The civil rights violators claim they want to keep guns out of the wrong hands, when the truth of the matter is you and I "have the wrong hands"
Example Output: Valid

Example Input: I do see the sense in some measures such as restricting access to guns for people who have committed violent crimes.
Example Output:
Valid