In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Input: Consider Input: Comment: Denver is becoming a kicking team. Other teams don't even need to kick them in the @$$. They will kick themselves in the @$$.

Output: Sexual-explicit


Input: Consider Input: Comment: If the Broncos do not give Sloter a chance by having him on their roster and letting him develop then some other team will. NFL scouts are not stupid! He has the highest Wonderlic score from the Combine and is an ideal size for a quarterback. He has a stong arm and throws with accuracy while always looking downfield.  He also has an innate ability to move in the pocket and rarely looks rattled.But, hey, let's bring in some bum and cut this kid and then hope he is around for the practice squad. If he goes to  another team, I hope he comes back to Denver, sometime in the future, and beats their ass!

Output: Sexual-explicit


Input: Consider Input: Comment: Why change the context of the trial and pretend you're presenting a similar case?

If a male much larger than you held you down and tried to force his penis into your anus - would it be improper for the judge to ask why you just couldn't keep your buttocks together?

     _____________

I posted that comment previously and, not surprisingly, it was rapidly deleted for "incivility":

Some might want to consider why it is "civil" to discuss this case in great detail when it is vaginal rape, but suddenly "incivil" when the actually (not spuriously) analogous scenario is presented.


Output: Sexual-explicit