Categorize the comment on the basis of obscenity. If the comment is obscene output Yes, otherwise output No.

Example Input: Check out bikeindex.org - where the cycling community is taking this sort of protection into their own hands. It has a pretty good success rate so far by letting people register their bikes for free, and then giving stolen bike data to shops, riders, police, etc.
Example Output: No

Example Input: Agreed.  If you look outside of the giant investor-bought buildings where they kick everyone out to make more money to satisfy large monied interests, almost all other "no-cause" evictions from smaller and independent landlords will have some good reason behind them, whether it is a problematic tenant (as described in one of the other stories from this article), family moving into the unit, wanting to renovate the property, etc.

If a tenant is a good tenant, that's worth a hell of a lot more than a small rent increase to keep them around.  If the tenant is paying only 50% or 60% of the market rent, well, do we ask any other business or property owner to consistently provide their goods and services at a 40-50% discount for all time?  No.
Example Output: No

Example Input: AOGA is a lobby group that only cares about taking as much money from Alaska as possible.  To cite AOGA as an authority is foolish.
Example Output:
Yes