The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.
--------
Question: Context: 'Hey! I'd like some more firewood to keep my doggo warm. What do you need?' 'I need firewood as well. We have a large group consisting of mostly senior citizens, including my grandma, so we'd like the firewood to keep everyone warm.' 'I see. 😮 What are you least interested in?'
Utterance: 'We can make do without extra water. Can we trade two waters for an extra firewood package and an extra food package?'

Answer: No


Question: Context: 'I apologize but that will not work. I have a diabetic and need to make sure they will have enough food for a hike. So I would like to take two food packages, one water, and two firewood. ' 'That won't work. Because, we are planning for a campfire. And so, we are in need of fire wood. I hope you understand.🙂🙂🙂' 'I understand. We are also planning a campfire, and have a lot of young kids who will need the fire to stay warm. So that's why I feel I need two firewoods. 🙂'
Utterance: 'Sorry for apologize. Here we are having old aged people here. I need two packages of food. Otherwise two of firewood.🙂'

Answer: Yes


Question: Context: 'we have to split it somehow' 'Food is my highest priority, but i am willing to take 1 for all the water.' 'that would be perfect for us, thank you, we have enough water'
Utterance: 'That's perfec for me, thanks.'

Answer:
No