In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: insult and non-insult. Insult is any lanugage or act that is disrespectful or scornfully abusive.

Input: Consider Input: Comment: There are lots of great thinkers and ideas that come out of the US, as well as probably more from self-serving ideologues that have found success in one way or another and subsequently consider themselves wise in all ways of the world. It would be nice to limit penetration of the latter while easing that of the former, but I think we all know which is in the ascendant these days all over the place.

Output: Non-insult


Input: Consider Input: Comment: Keep him......don't need to save any American too stupid to be in North Korea.

Output: Insult


Input: Consider Input: Comment: So many lies in that post, not a one of which will RD (who calls for honesty and humility) acknowledge, let alone apologize for.

I have thought deeply about marriage and the place of sex in marriage. I came to different conclusions than RD did. RD, in his arrogant way, believes that he can set a religious agenda that everyone should follow. 

My marriage vows were taken "seriously and deeply". I have looked at quite a few marriage vows, and not a one says "sex shall always be open to procreation". 

When I have sex with my wife, it is unitive, and RD is talking out of his hat when he says it isn't. But speaking in ignorance has never bothered RD. I also don't remember anything in the word of God that says sex must be open to procreation.

I got a vasectomy to save the life of my wife. RD would have had her die then, just as he wants her to die now with his desire she not have health insurance. 

I do not want to "write my own catechism". I just refuse to let RD write one for me.


Output: Non-insult