Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.

Ex Input:
Who would you get to kill the children and other members of their family?

Ex Output:
Yes


Ex Input:
Living comfortably while focusing on my band and screen printing guerrilla art while I work part-time at a bike store is an unassailable right.  

With the rising desirability of this area my SNAP benefits, SafeLink Wireless cellphone plan,  subsidized apartment rent and TriMet pass are just not cutting it anymore.

I demand an increase in these benefits so that I can afford to live comfortably in this desirable and increasingly expensive city.

Ex Output:
No


Ex Input:
Well, the trial has just begun, so undoubtedly we will hear more.  Unfortunately, it will all be Highly edited and selective - to make whichever points the prosecution or defense is trying to make.  This is of course expected to the defense [it's their job], but one would like to see AST and the DA do Considerably Less selective editing and dramatic posturing, for a fuller and more realistic presentation of the fact to the jurors.
After the trial the case file Should be Public Information, available to anyone that files a FOIA request.  Good luck though, breaking the file out of AST's grip, or in gaining a solid and unbiased understanding of the events from the file if you get it.  Often, and most especially when AST has "a personal interest" in the prosecution, the Troopers appear incapable of conducting open, unbiased investigations.

Ex Output:

Yes