In this task, you will be presented with a context from an academic paper and a question separated with a 
. You have to answer the question based on the context.

[Q]: We introduce a surrogate training objective that avoids these problems and as a result is fully continuous.  Specifically, we form a continuous function softLB that seeks to approximate the result of running our decoder on input INLINEFORM0 and then evaluating the result against INLINEFORM1 using INLINEFORM2 . 
 Question: Do they provide a framework for building a sub-differentiable for any final loss metric?
[A]: Yes


[Q]: Based on the gained insights, we have improved the state-of-the-art in XNLI for the Translate-Test and Zero-Shot approaches by a substantial margin. 
 Question: Is the improvement over state-of-the-art statistically significant?
[A]: Yes


[Q]: Given a statement and articles, workers are asked to judge whether the statement can be derived from the articles at three grades: True, Likely (i.e. Answerable), or Unsure (i.e. Unanswerable). If a worker selects Unsure, we ask workers to tell us why they are unsure from two choices (“Not stated in the article” or “Other”). If a worker selects True or Likely in the judgement task, we first ask which sentences in the given articles are justification explanations for a given statement, similarly to HotpotQA BIBREF2. The “summary” text boxes (i.e. NLDs) are then initialized with these selected sentences. 
 Question: How was the dataset annotated?
[A]:
True, Likely (i.e. Answerable), or Unsure (i.e. Unanswerable) why they are unsure from two choices (“Not stated in the article” or “Other”) The “summary” text boxes