In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

[EX Q]: Comment: Dick-ometrics.....  So.... a longer dick, like a longer password, is more secure?
[EX A]: Sexual-explicit

[EX Q]: Comment: "Arson in the second degree 
164.315 
 A person commits the crime of arson in the second degree if:

By knowingly engaging in the manufacture of methamphetamine, the person causes fire or causes an explosion that damages ...Any property of another and the damages to the property exceed $750"

I think we need to add 'hash oil manufacturing' to this Oregon statute.   Too many stoned idiots are out there playing  chemist.
[EX A]: Non-sexual-explicit

[EX Q]: Comment: I take my dog there from time to time, and I've never felt unsafe. There's usually a few homeless/drunks, but they stay out of the dog park area and I've never had problems with them. Hopefully APD will keep a closer eye on the place. It would be a shame to lose a nice place to this kind of crap.
[EX A]:
Non-sexual-explicit