In this task, you are given a part of an article. Your task is to generate headline (title) for this text. Preferred headlines are under fifteen words.
--------
Question: 1 Ranks, processes and flat grammar ....................................................................................... 2 2 The Rank-Interpretation Architecture for Multilinear Grammars ......................................... 6 2.1 Outline of the Rank-Interpretation Architecture framework .............................................. 6 2.2 A preliminary note on linearity and hierarchy at the phrasal rank ..................................... 7 2.3 Characterisation of the Rank-Interpretation Architecture .................................................. 9 2.3.1 Background ..................................................................................................................... 9 2.3.2 Formal summary ........................................................................................................... 10 2.3.3 Contrast with traditional views of language architecture .............................................. 11 2.3.4 Search for sui generis properties of ranks ..................................................................... 11 2.4 Procedural perspectives on the rank hierarchy ................................................................. 12 3 The discourse rank .............................................................................................................. 15 3.1 The primacy of discourse patterning ................................................................................ 15 3.2 Intonation of an adjacency pair ........................................................................................ 16 3.3 Chanted ‘call’ intonation .................................................................................................. 18 4 The utterance or text rank ................................................................................................... 20 5 The phrase rank ................................................................................................................... 22 5.1 Characteristics of phrasal structure .................................................................................. 22 5.2 Linear sequences, iteration: regular and subregular grammars ........................................ 23 5.3 A note on long-distance and cross-serial dependencies ................................................... 26 5.4 Prosodic-phonetic interpretation at the phrasal rank ........................................................ 27 6 The word rank ..................................................................................................................... 30 6.1 Flat words ......................................................................................................................... 30 6.2 Flat derivations ................................................................................................................. 30 6.3 Flat compounds ................................................................................................................ 31 6.4 Prosodic-phonetic interpretation at the word rank ........................................................... 31 7 Summary and conclusion .................................................................................................... 33 7.1 From Duality to Multilinear Grammar and Rank Interpretation Architecture ................. 33 7.2 Generalisation to stochastic flat linear models ................................................................. 34 7.3 Future work ...................................................................................................................... 35 8 References ........................................................................................................................... 36

Answer: Multilinear Grammar: Ranks and Interpretations


Question: Recommender systems often use latent features to explain the behaviors of users and capture the properties of items. As users interact with different items over time, user and item features can influence each other, evolve and co-evolve over time. To accurately capture the fine grained nonlinear coevolution of these features, we propose a recurrent coevolutionary feature embedding process model, which combines recurrent neural network (RNN) with a multidimensional point process model. The RNN learns a nonlinear representation of user and item features which take into account mutual influence between user and item features, and the feature evolution over time. We also develop an efficient stochastic gradient algorithm for learning the model parameters, which can readily scale up to millions of events. Experiments on diverse real-world datasets demonstrate significant improvements in user behavior prediction compared to state-of-the-arts.

Answer: Recurrent Coevolutionary Feature Embedding Processes for Recommendation


Question: One difficulty faced in knowledge engineering for Bayesian Network (BN) is the quantification step where the Conditional Probability Tables (CPTs) are determined. The number of parameters included in CPTs increases exponentially with the number of parent variables. The most common solution is the application of the so-called canonical gates. The Noisy-OR (NOR) gate, which takes advantage of the independence of causal interactions, provides a logarithmic reduction of the number of parameters required to specify a CPT. In this paper, an extension of NOR model based on the theory of belief functions, named Belief Noisy-OR (BNOR), is proposed. BNOR is capable of dealing with both aleatory and epistemic uncertainty of the network. Compared with NOR, more rich information which is of great value for making decisions can be got when the available knowledge is uncertain. Specially, when there is no epistemic uncertainty, BNOR degrades into NOR. Additionally, different structures of BNOR are presented in this paper in order to meet various needs of engineers. The application of BNOR model on the reliability evaluation problem of networked systems demonstrates its effectiveness.

Answer:
THE BELIEF NOISY-OR MODEL APPLIED TO NETWORK RELIABILITY ANALYSIS