In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: toxic and non-toxic. Toxicity is defiend as anything that is rude, disrespectful, or unreasonable that would make someone want to leave a converation.
--------
Question: Comment: The Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) and the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission approved the deal.  The State Department was one of nine agencies comprising CFIUS, which vets potential national security impacts of transactions where a foreign government gains control of a U.S. company. The other agencies were the departments of Treasury, Defense, Justice, Commerce, Energy and Homeland Security, and two White House agencies (Office of the U.S. Trade Representative and Office of Science and Technology Policy).
Clinton herself was not involved in the State Department’s review and did not direct the department to take any position on the sale of Uranium One. As PolitiFact found, the majority of donations made to the Clinton Fdn were made before and during Clinton’s 2008 presidential run. So Trump’s claim that Hillary Clinton “gave [uranium to] Russia for a big payment” is not accurate
Quit believing crap like "Clinton Cash" and do some research yourself....

Answer: Non-toxic


Question: Comment: #SenateDoYourJob

Answer: Non-toxic


Question: Comment: I was misinformed about the lead shot ban being overturned.  Simple enough.

But you're hysterics and insecurity aren't warranted as far as claiming some ulterior motive fueled by 'leftist' ideology, or some nefarious attempt to 'price you out of hunting', or your claim that 'the end of hunting' is my goal.

My but you're an insecure paranoid, no doubt driven by an overly excitable unbridled crazy imagination, not to mention weird stuff you must read or hear.

Good luck with all that.

Hopefully all lead ammo and lead tackle will be phased out voluntarily or banned either one.  There's really no valid or compelling argument for continuing to misuse such toxic material vs more responsible and available materials.

If you're much of a hunter, the price of a bullet , even if it's twice as much as what you're paying now, is a small price to pay and certainly next to nothing compared to all your other costs when you hunt.

But, maybe you can't hit what you're aiming at.  Is that it?

Answer:
Non-toxic