We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

[Q]: So, since 1976, we have had possibly ONE innocent person executed out of 1000?
[A]: Valid


[Q]: Overall, I'd say, we'd spare ourselves a lot if we just went with locking some people up and throwing away the key.
[A]: Valid


[Q]: States without the death penalty have fared BETTER in reducing their murder rates than states with the death penalty.
[A]:
Valid