TASK DEFINITION: We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.
PROBLEM: Sent1: So what you're saying is, even if the guy we're sending to the chair didn't actually commit a murder, he should still die because he was an asshole in his personal life.
 Sent2: No he the guy who killed twitter should have to suffer in jail and think about what he done for the rest of his life, and not be given the easy way out buy the death pentaly.

SOLUTION: Not similar

PROBLEM: Sent1: The problem with the death penalty is eventually someone will be sentenced to death when they are in fact guilty.
 Sent2: Only if they try to murder somebody after they are in prison do they deserve the death penalty?

SOLUTION: Not similar

PROBLEM: Sent1: As far as I know, you may as well ACTUALLY believe any number of things, if you actually believe in the death penalty.
 Sent2: If you think there shouldn't be a death penalty, you're an idiot.

SOLUTION:
Not similar