In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

Example Input: Comment: People like you are just plain nuts. We can't change what's already taken place and the systems we use right now, but we can alter whats going to happen in the future. If we followed your ideology then we'd still be poisoning rivers and watersheds with raw chemicals and we'd have a dozen more Love Canals. People like you think the status quo is just fine no matter how much damage it does. Burning oil and gas causes us about 15 billion per year in excess health costs from lung and respiratory disease. Instead or praising your almighty pipeline and oil god why not try and look into alternate sources that would reduce (not end) our need for this harmful stuff. 

Actually forget it .... lets just go back and start using DDT and asbestos in large scales ... I mean who needs good health right. I mean why change when it was all so good before. We won't just stop using the stuff but we can stop expanding it's use. Which would you prefer
Example Output: Non-identity-attack

Example Input: Comment: My comment was deleted.

Screw you censors!, islam is a problem and so are you!
Example Output: Identity-attack

Example Input: Comment: Tulsi's right. Why oppose Steve Bannon? We have to play the hand we're dealt, right? Sure Putin made sure that a white supremacist FSB agent was part of that hand. But how bad could Putin be? He likes Assad after all and Assad is buds with my girl Tulsi. Hence Steven Bannon is all good. QED. Free copies of Evola for everyone.  Well, everyone who's white that is.
Example Output:
Identity-attack