In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

Example Input: Comment: Madam Pelosi, you do understand that these hooded criminals are paid for by George Soros don't you?
Example Output: Non-identity-attack

Example Input: Comment: Are you kidding me. Trans gender bathroom bill, westboro, god hates fags, attempting to pint gays as pedophiles, painting gays as the cause of the aids epidemic, and constantly judging everyone through a very negative lens has been the religious rights mode of attack.

Then you dare come on here and again attack people that call out intolerance. It is not intolerance to point out hate, and your side peddles in hate of everything they didn't like.

Your side has spent years shouting down and name calling anyone that doesn't agree, then you come here and blame the other side. Par for the course, I guess.

Party of Personal Responsibility or is it Party of Her Emails now?
Example Output: Identity-attack

Example Input: Comment: This guy is soft.  Not a leader.  If he's on the Avs then he needs to make statements to the effect that he is a team player and will play hard and inspire his teammates.  He's never done that which is why nobody wants him.  He is a cancer to a team that is starting anew.
Example Output:
Non-identity-attack