In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

[EX Q]: Comment: Sorry, I consider a woman loose if she sleeps around a lot with different partners.  She seems to be concentrating more or less on one partner at a time.  Don't see anything wrong with that.  By the way did you wait until marriage before you had sex?  Just curious. 

Perhaps that is wrong with so called conservatives.  :-)
They haven't kept up with the times.  No wonder they tend to be so cranky.
[EX A]: Non-identity-attack

[EX Q]: Comment: Lesbians don't deserve rights anywhere. Why make it an issue in Anchorage?
[EX A]: Identity-attack

[EX Q]: Comment: The Chinese always play a duplicitous game, and the cereal-bowl-haircut-lunatic in NK is their boy: lock stock and barrel.

They have no intention of reining in Kim - he is doing exactly as the Chinese leadership wants and intends him to do - act as a bargaining chip.

The Chinese don't want THAAD deployed- but rather than raising it directly with the US, their bellicose little attack dog in Pyongyang is instructed to do it for them in his inimitable way.

Quite the theater production.
[EX A]:
Identity-attack