TASK DEFINITION: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.
PROBLEM: Comment: AMEN!

SOLUTION: Non-obscene

PROBLEM: Comment: Being registered in multiple states is one thing. Actually voting in the same election more than once is a much bigger issue. 

You should really try a little harder. Comparing anyone to Hitler is a weak attempt to win an arguement. If you really think President Trump is comparable to one of the biggest killers in history you should do a little self reflection.

SOLUTION: Non-obscene

PROBLEM: Comment: What a freakin' scam. This guy got public money to spend two summers fishing for lakers on the coastal plain and justified it by suggesting he could get information not otherwise available through that research. The oldest fish was 55 years old. Climate records are readily available for that period and the "discovery" that fish grow faster in years when food is more plentiful is certainly not groundbreaking. The citizens want their money back. This guy can pay for his own fishing trips.

SOLUTION:
Obscene