The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.

Example Input: Context: 'Hmm. Maybe we could go out together on a run. 🙂Always nice to have a running partner. So maybe on the water you get 2, me 1. Then on the Firewood the opposite?' 'That would be fun! I feel like I always do better when I have someone to run against.  Competition does me good. That sounds fantastic on the fire wood and water split.  What is your food situation looking like??' 'How about this? 2 for you and 1 for me. Going low carb and mostly brought my own. What do you think? '
Utterance: 'That sounds great! I don't think my chances for catching any fish are pretty slim!'
Example Output: No

Example Input: Context: 'That sounds good to me!' 'ok, so to make sure we're on the same page. You get 2 food, 2 water and 1 firewood. I will take 1 food, 1 water, and 2 firewood?' 'Yup, I am ready to submit the deal if it's all good with you!'
Utterance: 'Yes sir! (or ma'am), I accept the deal!'
Example Output: No

Example Input: Context: 'hmm, here's what I'm willing to do. I will take all the water, one firewood and one food.' 'That doesn't sound fair to me.' 'Ok, what would you counter offer with?'
Utterance: 'I would like all 3 packages of firewood and 1 package of food. You can have the rest.'
Example Output:
No