The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the no-need strategy, otherwise output No. no-need is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used when a participant points out that they do not need an item based on personal context such as suggesting that they have ample water to spare. no-need can directly benefit the opponent since it implies that the item is up for grabs.

Q: Context: 'Hello, how are you today? 🙂' 'good, how are you 🙂' 'Great!  I'm on a camping trip with my five children, how about you?'
Utterance: 'I'm also going camping with my two children and 2 of my nephews  How would you like to divide the supplies?'

A: No
****
Q: Context: 'Hi, I am looking at extra items for my camping trip and would like to have 3 firewoods, 3 foods and 2 waters.'
Utterance: 'Hey, I am excited to go camping too!  Would you mind sharing your top priority items with me so that we can come up with a fair deal?  Ideally I would love 3 firewoods, 3 foods, and 2 waters just like you aha.  But perhaps we can each get at least 3 packages of our highest priority item '

A: No
****
Q: Context: 'Didn't you bring any firewood at all with you?' 'Yes, but the firewood I have will be used to keep us warm tonight.  Like you mentioned before it will be a bit chilly tonight.' 'Ahh, I forgot about that. OK. I'll take 2 packages of firewood, give you 2 waters, and 1 food packages as you do have some fish to cook and I don't. Do we have a deal?'
Utterance: 'OK, we have a deal.🙂'

A:
No
****