We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

Ex Input:
The 2nd Amendment does NOT provide an individual the Right to own gun(s) for the PURPOSE OF providing for: food, self-defense, target practice, a hobby as a collector, or fun.

Ex Output:
Valid


Ex Input:
This decision, Cases v US, is where the militia connection qualification (fn2) was born and another, US v Tot is where the "state's right" interpretations (fn3) came into being

Ex Output:
Valid


Ex Input:
Gun hater Sarah Brady like al gun hater blame the right to bear arms for the crimes committed with guns.

Ex Output:

Valid