In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Ex Input:
Comment: Without going through the legal channels to change how the pay out is done, this is flat out illegal. 

So instead of local businesses and citizens infusing and stimulating OUR economy, he wants to pour 700M into a bucket with holess in it.

Blatant thievery. Gov. Walker.

You shame the office of Govenor and Alaska. You are guilty of HURTING the innocent and poor and taking that which does not belong to you to take.

Ex Output:
Non-obscene


Ex Input:
Comment: Sue his ass amen! The PERMANENT fund dividend is based off a system that replenishes its self every year. If we don't have as good of a year then the PFD would be less. Based off a 5 year average. He wants to cut the money that we would be putting back into the economy to bail out the states fuck ups. How about the state pay for there own mistakes and stop with all the dump road projects like upgrading our high way to 6-8 lanes. We don't need that. Slow down take your time or drive a different rout. Or all the money there wasting on bridges to no where. Or there own salaries. Don't cut the PFD.

Ex Output:
Obscene


Ex Input:
Comment: NO NO NO NO  You knucklehead.  I said he was a Homicidal Maniac, sociopath was too polite. Holy Crap, how bunched ARE your panties?

Ex Output:

Obscene