We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

[EX Q]: Jess was executed for two murders with Donald Henry Gaskins, a serial killer.
[EX A]: Valid

[EX Q]: If both acheive the same goal of keeping society away from harm, then why go overboard in reducing the criminals rights by killing him?
[EX A]: Valid

[EX Q]: So as long as only some innocent people are killed for crimes they didn't commit then the system must be sound.
[EX A]:
Valid