Given a document and an entity the task is to select the author's sentiment towards the entity. Sentiments can be Positive, Neutral and Negative. Select Positive if the article expresses a positive view towards the given entity or praises its quality or skills. Select Neutral if the document expresses no clear view towards the entity or has equal amounts of positive and negative statements or expressing some fact/quote by someone else. Select Negative if the article expresses a negative view towards like harsh remarks, criticizing entities action/decision etc. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

Input: Consider Input: What is the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Rachel Maddow ? MSNBC star Rachel Maddowâs latest anti-Trump conspiracy theory was so outlandish that even the dependably liberal HuffPost criticized it as "so flimsy that it could be debunked by a quick glance at a map."
On Thursday evening  "The Rachel Maddow Show" opened with a somber 25-minute diatribe that attempted to connect the tragic ambush attack that killed four American soldiers in Niger to the latest version of President Trumpâs proposed travel ban  which included the nation of Chad.  Maddow  essentially claimed that the inclusion of Chad  which recently pulled  its  troops out of Niger  in the revised travel ban resulted in extremist attacks such as the one that left four Americans dead.
The HuffPost  which is so anti-Trump that it refused to even cover him in the political section during the early stages of his campaign  published a story headlined  "What the hell was this  Rachel Maddow  segment?" The MSNBC host proclaimed that Chadâs pullout from Niger "had an immediate effect in emboldening ISIS attacks " but the HuffPost easily shot down her theory.
Colby College Department of Government assistant professor Laura Seay told the HuffPost that "any expert" would have said  Maddow 's conspiracy theory was "crazy" and the pullout of Chadian troops isnât necessarily related to the Trumpâs travel ban.
"Everybody that I know is appalled by this. I would like to think that  Maddow 's researchers are more responsible " Seay told the HuffPost.
"The Rachel Maddow Show" declined to comment to HuffPost but the host addressed the situation on Friday nightâs episode.
"Over the course of the day today  lots of people have been very upset with me for reporting that last night  which is fine. I didnât know you cared. But the upset over my reporting doesnât mean that anything I reported wasnât true "  Maddow  said. "Everything I reported was true."
 Maddow  continued: "Now  this doesnât mean that Chad withdrawing their troops was necessarily the cause of what happened to those U.S. troops who were ambushed. That ambush is being described by the Pentagon as a shock."
The HuffPostâs Willa Frej wrote that  Maddow  built "myths" using unrelated or unreliable information and "reduced the story so thoroughly that it lost any semblance of the larger truth."
 Maddow  has seen increased viewership as the triggered left tunes in to watch  her  condemn Trump on a nightly basis  butit seems the MSNBC host this time went too far for one of the most liberal publications in America.

Output: Negative


Input: Consider Input: What is the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Rocio Maneiro Gonzalez ? Rocio Maneiro Gonzalez  Venezuelan ambassador to China  said that the two countries  which respects and supports each other  have seen active results from their cooperation.
The ambassador said the establishment of bilateral strategic partnership  with agriculture and energy cooperation as two pillars  has played an important role in promoting the Venezuela- China relations.
Besides  high-level visits  technical personnel exchanges and close collaboration in international affairs between the two countries have also advanced bilateral ties substantively  the ambassador added.
"I strongly believe that  Venezuela-China relations will be further consolidated and strengthened with joint efforts of both sides " she said.

Output: Positive


Input: Consider Input: What is the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Seuss Museum ? A controversial mural at the Amazing World of Dr. Seuss Museum in Massachusetts will be replaced after several children's authors complained that it promoted racial stereotypes â and that they were boycotting an upcoming festival at the newly opened museum because of it.
Willems  Yee and Curato had been invited to appear at the festival on Oct. 14 at the Amazing World of  Dr. Seuss Museum  which opened in June .
The event was described by  the museum  as "a day filled with books  costumed characters and famous authors." But the three authors said they were skipping the festival after having learned about the mural's racial stereotype.
"While this image may have been considered amusing to some when it was published 80 years ago  it is obviously offensive in 2017 " they wrote. "For some children who visit  the museum   their only interaction with Asian representation might be that painting. For others  seeing themselves represented in such a stereotypical way may feed into internalized  even subconscious shame and humiliation. It is incumbent on our public institutions to present all races in a fair manner.


Output: Neutral