Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.

Example Input: While not wrong. When you are young and stupid (most are now) you make mistakes. Woman especially can accidentally drink more than they anticipated and then pass out. This is the woman's fault she gets raped? Common now Common
Example Output: Yes

Example Input: As we have seen on news casts even with video proof you have difficult time removing cops from the force for unprofessional behavior or unjustified shooting. Wooten like to flaunt his copship. He was not a true law enforcement officer. Idiot fits in family of disfunctional idiots.
Example Output: Yes

Example Input: I have lived in Alaska almost 30 years.  I think all responsible users are NOT "toking and driving" - just as responsible drinkers do not "drink and drive."  Those who don't honor the law or principles of ethics are certainly not 'moral' in the sense I mean, and you should not have written they are among 'the most moral people' you know.   Surely we must express disapproval of unsafe driving, as an absolute minimum.  And maybe we should rethink legalization - if it going to make access easier to a significant population which won't behave well.  As well as rethinking making the penalty for bad behavior merely a fine - which is the new proposed code.  Sounds like those who have money and no sense are getting a 'get out of jail free card' until they actually kill someone.
Example Output:
No