In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Ex Input:
Comment: 100yrs from now... 

"ah yes, ol' standoff szajkowski, i remember him well.  boy, nobody could pull off a standoff like joe; he had a real talent for it.  so talented in fact that he began teaching standoff tactics 101 at the local community college.  tell that guy to do something and he'd stonewall your ass til' the cows came home.  ya know, a lot of people didn't know this about joe, but he was a phenomenal badminton player too.  yep, i didn't believe it either when i first heard.  but it's true.  they used to call 'em ol' shuttlecock szajkowski.  wonder whatever happened to that standoff-havin' shuttlecock whackin' crazy sonofabitch?"

Ex Output:
Obscene


Ex Input:
Comment: What else is to be expected when a non-leader with zero grasp is made chief?
This is just part of the fulfillment; preordained.
Onward it will go. Are we halfway yet? Hopefully, this debacle is a marker on the short, last leg to Trump's demise.

Ex Output:
Non-obscene


Ex Input:
Comment: The Liberals were the ones who started the Canadian investment in the F-35. I believe the defense departments intent all along was to buy the F-35. Unfortunately the long delays and the increased cost made the project controversial. 

The Liberals made a stupid campaign promise not to buy the F-35 and at the same time wanted a competition which the F-35 probably would have won. Ackward.

The F-18 purchase is for political expediency and saving face.

Ex Output:

Non-obscene