We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

Input: Consider Input: The ATF has been known to lie on record to prosecute people.

Output: Valid


Input: Consider Input: Like I said before, claiming that semi-automatic rifles get a lower level of constitutional protection than handguns because they are less useful for self defense seems absurd from historical point of view.

Output: Valid


Input: Consider Input: Had James Holmes not been able to acquire this magazine his rifle would not have been disabled and he would have been free to change out empty magazines as often as he pleased.


Output: Valid