In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: toxic and non-toxic. Toxicity is defiend as anything that is rude, disrespectful, or unreasonable that would make someone want to leave a converation.
--------
Question: Comment: This article is surprising coming from 2 seemingly reasonable bush reps. But I smell a rat, or two.
"No magic bullet?"  Read, & do not fail to understand Dr.Robin Brena's clear analysis of how SB21 crippled & continues to bleed all Alaskans of their Clear & Equitable Share of oil profits.
Merely restructuring the oil/gas credits is a first step, but not even close to enough.
"we lost 1,500 private sector & 1,700 public sector jobs", our bloated gubmut got trimmed, but not nearly enough. No tears for that,
Why do Seaton & Foster not address the Tyranosaurus Rex in the mix - the (what should be criminal) SB21 & its larcenous take of Alaska's profits, set up & now condoned by our own Legislators & carefully not mentioned in this transparent plea for individual Alaskan's to sacrifice their own finances to pad the profits of BigOil?
Seaton & Foster lost a lot of their credibility with their authorship of this Opinion. Why are they afraid of BigOil?
We should have an income & sales tax, too

Answer: Non-toxic


Question: Comment: Facebook is a platform for sophomoric idiots to publicly post examples of their stupidity.

Answer: Toxic


Question: Comment: pathetic to see the lunatic alt left liberal sheep like you loser thinking that because the MINORITY alt left in the usa loves justin, somehow thats good for canada! when in  fact its bad considering the majority, the ones we do business with see thru his empty bs and hate him for his lunatic nonsense like paying a terrorist off with 10 million!

Answer:
Toxic