In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

[EX Q]: Comment: Susan, that was a wonderful editorial however clearly you haven't been paying attention to the endless stream of propaganda spewing from pot activists.  If you did, you'd know that stoners are simply awesome.  They wouldn't hurt a flea. They never, ever, ever, ever drive while high and if they do, they're a million times safer than regular drivers because they're so gosh darn careful. Those stories you read about the increase in accidents since pot was legalized are wrong.  Legalizing pot eliminated drug crimes.  Those stories about recent pot deals and shootings gone bad are lies planted by anti pot forces. The stories about stoners selling Washington pot in other states in direct violation of the law are wrong too...gosh they would never do something silly like that.

/voting against the legalization of pot was definitely in my self interest
//why do you think they call it dope?
[EX A]: Non-obscene

[EX Q]: Comment: "and more knowledgeable citizens"

Well you must not be a regular reader of the G&M. Just two days ago as part of the lead up to the Canada day celebration their was a fascinating piece here informing Canadians who hadn't heard that evidently Americans now think it's cool to be stupid. 
In the excitement leading up to a celebration somewhat similar to America's 4th of July, Canada's national newspaper ran on it's 'front page' , top center, that your only neighbors think it's cool to be stupid.
[EX A]: Non-obscene

[EX Q]: Comment: you overestimated the integrity of the electorates.

They repeatedly elected the provably  corrupt Liberals.
[EX A]:
Non-obscene