Given a document, generate a short title of the document. The title should convey the main idea/event/topic about which the document is being written. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

Ex Input:
Documents released by the New Zealand Security Intelligence Service (SIS) show the then  17-year-old Christopher Lewis  shot at the Queen as  she  got out of  her  vehicle on the way to a science fair on Oct. 14 during  her  eight-day tour of the Commonwealth nation.
 âLewis  did indeed originally intend to assassinate the Queen  however did not have a suitable vantage point from which to fire  nor a sufficiently high-powered rifle for the range from the target â said a 1997 SIS memo  that was declassified in February and sent to Reuters on Thursday.
 Lewis   who intelligence documents described as a âseverely disturbedâ youth  was not charged with attempted murder or treason  adding to claims the incident was downplayed to prevent embarrassment to a country hosting a royal visit.
According to intelligence documents  police kept a close eye on  Lewis  during a 1986 visit by the Queen to New Zealand  fearing that  he  was still a risk.
More than a decade after the incident   Lewis  was charged with the brutal murder of an Auckland mother and the abduction of  her  baby daughter  who was later dropped at a nearby church.
According to multiple news reports at the time   Lewis  electrocuted  himself  while in prison in 1997 awaiting the murder trial.  He  denied the murder charge in a suicide note.

Ex Output:
New Zealand teenager tried to assassinate Queen Elizabeth in 1981: intelligence agency


Ex Input:
Laura Ingraham  was one of the few people who saw Donald Trumpâs shocking victory coming. More importantly  as a former speechwriter for Ronald Reagan who saw firsthand how viciously the Bush-aligned establishment despised Reaganâs working-class voters   Ingraham  understands how powerful the conservative-populist movement is and why the elites in the permanent political class have spent gazillions and worked overtime for three decades to thwart it.
In  her  blockbuster new book  Billionaire at the Barricades: The Populist Revolution from Reagan to Trump  Ingraham  the best-selling author  explains how Trump got elected and the forces heâand other economic nationalistsâwill have to battle to implement the peopleâs agenda.
Billionaire at the Barricades is a must-read because  Ingraham   who still gets chills when she sees footage of the crowd at Kemper Arena in 1976 realizing they had nominated the wrong man in Gerald Ford  takes readers on a fast-paced journey through the 2016 campaign cycle and shows how everyone who was blindsided by Trumpâs rise should have seen it coming  especially after Dave Bratâs shocking primary victory over then-House Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-VA) in 2014.
Elites give off the impression that Trumpâs populism on the campaign trail was something they had never seen before when  in fact  every candidate who has won the presidency in the television age has been the one who was the most populist. As  Ingraham  writes  âpresidential candidates invoke the populist style because it connects with working people.â
Conservatism and populism  according to  Ingraham   âoverlap in their opposition to âbig thingsââbig government  big international organizations  big media  big business cronyism.â
Reagan understood that âthese distant  uncaring entities rob people of decision making and ignore their interests â and  Ingraham  notes that âPat Buchanan and Donald Trump summarized conservative populism best when each vowed to put âAmerica first.ââ
âConservative populists tend to support a policy of economic nationalismâpeople-centered economic policies that put the nation and its workers first. They oppose a massive national debt because it weakens America and makes its citizens beholden to lenders â  she  continues. âThey also believe high taxes are bad because they sap workersâ wages and economic freedom. Similarly  they are against huge trade deals and international organizations like the World Trade Organization because they take power out of the hands of voters and give it to a far-away and often hostile global elite.â
When it comes to foreign policy   Ingraham  explains that âconservative populists oppose broad military interventionism and believe military force should only be used when American interests are threatened.â  She  slams populismâs critics who foolishly toss around âthe term âisolationismâ to dismiss populist foreign policy â even though that label does not describe any populist  she  has ever known.
 Ingraham  points out that âthroughout the Cold War  populists were among the strongest voices opposing Soviet communism.â In addition  populists have always believed that âsquandering the nationâs wealth and blood on un-winnable wars and nation-building is unwise. Instead  they support a pragmatic foreign policy based on achieving âpeace through strengthâ by maintaining a strong military and using it prudently.â
Unfortunately  as  Ingraham  details  âsome conservatives took a dangerous detourâ and âthrust us into a bizarre world of globalization  wars based on idealism and nation-building  and intense hatred toward the very voters who accounted for the Reagan coalition in the first place.â
The betrayal started almost immediately after George H.W. Bush won Reaganâs third term. The Bush administration purged Reaganites  and  Ingraham  recalls that Margaret Tutwiler told Reaganite Ed Rollins at a party that âthere are a lot of us who had to suffer during the eight years of Reagan  and now itâs our turn.â
âWe were Reagan people. They were Bush people. We all knew what the differences were â  Ingraham  writes. âMany of the GOP Establishment types who behind closed doors scoffed at Reagan as a dim-witted former actor with anââultraconservativeâ outlook were now working in the Bush administration. They thought it was time to return the Republican Party to what they believed was its more genteel  respectable roots. In effect  it meant the return to power of the Rockefeller Republicans who had worked to deny Reagan the presidency in 1976.â
Bushâs Office of Management and Budget Director Richard Darman convinced Bush to infamously abandon his âread my lipsâ pledge not to raise taxes  and  in the end   Ingraham  argues that âGeorge H. W. Bush stalled the conservative-populist engine that powered Reaganism.â As Rollins said  âGeorge Bush was the beneficiary of the greatest baton pass in presidential history in 1988  and he and his people tossed it away.â
âGlobalism is fundamentally anti-American because it aims to raze American sovereignty by atrophying our ability to take independent actions that are in our nationâs best interests â  Ingraham  writes  pointing out that globalists do not understand that âbecause of the enormous anti-American sentiment around the world  itâs almost impossible to create a multinational organization where U.S. interests donât become compromised or harmed.â
Just like his father  George W. Bush campaigned as a populist but governed as a globalist.  Ingraham  blames âBushâs decision to aggressively pursue amnesty after his unpopular warâ for insulting the âmillions of conservative-populists who had worked so hard to put him in power.â
âBecause of Bush  conservatives lost everything â  she  continues. âWe lost the House. We lost the Senate. And we lost the White House.â

Ex Output:
Laura Ingrahamâs âBillionaire at the Barricadesâ Gives Conservative


Ex Input:
San Francisco prosecutors say that  45-year old Jose Ines Garcia Zarate  a homeless man who had been deported multiple times   intentionally fired the single shot that killed the 32-year old Steinle as  she  was walking arm-in-arm with  her  father on July 1  2015.
 Defense attorneys for Garcia Zarate  say  he  has no history of violence and that the shooting was an accident.  They  argue that  Garcia Zarate  found the handgunâa .40 caliber Sig Sauerâwrapped in a cloth under  his  seat on the pier and that the gun discharged as  he  was handling it.
The defense says the single shot ricocheted off the concrete ground about 12 to 15 feet away from  Zarate  and then traveled another 78 feet or more before striking Steinle in the back. A city crime scene inspector told the jury that the defendant aimed the gun in Steinle's direction seeking to strike her.
The gun had been stolen four days earlier from the parked car of a visiting off-duty Bureau of Land Management ranger. The prosecution and defense agree that there is no evidence linking  Garcia Zarate  to that robbery.
As KQED's Alex Emslie told All Things Considered  the case hangs on whether the jury concludes that  Garcia Zarate  intentionally shot Steinle as the prosecution argued  or that it was a tragic accident  as the defense contends.
Garcia Zarate  who is reported to have no more than a second grade education  had been deported five times and was scheduled for a sixth deportation after serving a 46-month federal prison term for felony re-entry to the United States. But instead of deporting him  federal authorities transferred him to San Francisco on a warrant for a 20-year old marijuana charge. San Francisco prosecutors eventually dropped the charge because evidence in the case had been destroyed. The Sheriff's Department released  Garcia Zarate  under its sanctuary city policy that directs local law enforcement to ignore federal detainer requests. The Steinle killing happened about two-and-a-half months after  Garcia Zarate  was released.

Ex Output:

Jury Deliberations Begin In Kate Steinle's Murder Trial : The Two