TASK DEFINITION: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.
PROBLEM: Comment: Your damn right it is sad who are the traitors and liars that run these papers. I used to love and admire the globe no goddamn longer that's for sure. Nothing but bias . I am really worried Muslims and communists are going to overrun this great nation with help from Justin Trudeau and his band of merry Ho Ho's. Liberals are no longer the reasonable people they used to be . Stand up Canada .Before it is too late . Hoist a weapon if you have to but lets get rid of this politically correct band of rich zealots parading new world order under disguise of tolerance.

SOLUTION: Obscene

PROBLEM: Comment: Because a gunman murdered six Muslims at prayer. Or were you forgetting that?

SOLUTION: Non-obscene

PROBLEM: Comment: A thoughtful article, but with what I think is one striking error: "But in showing O'Reilly the door, the network makes a strong statement that it has zero tolerance for acts of sexual harassment."  How did Pitts reach that conclusion?  Fox had a lot of tolernace for it, with Ailes, and with O'Reilly - 5 different women were paid off a total of $13M over the years and yet Fox kept O'Reilly on.  Only after it became public and more women came forward did they finally  show him the door.

SOLUTION:
Non-obscene