In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

[EX Q]: Comment: But federal government funded and controlled healthcare is currently about 67% of national healthcare, leaving private insurance at about 33%. So how will wringing "ridiculous deductibles and premiums to the for-profit insurance companies" of a small percent of national healthcare result in enough funding for Medicare-for-all. The math doesn't add up unless income and payroll taxes are increased significantly.

And remember not all private insurance is for profit, Kaiser-Permante and other private providers are non-profit.
[EX A]: Non-identity-attack

[EX Q]: Comment: White male racists did it
[EX A]: Identity-attack

[EX Q]: Comment: I can fully appreciate your boredom with taxes. As a retired tax practitioner I "defended" taxes with the words of the guy who sweeps up after elephant parades, "One man's elephant droppings are another man's bread and butter." :))

PLEASE don't allow your boredom with taxes to stop you from letting your US Rep know that you are aware of the GOP plan to shrink the taxpaying base down to a permanent, indefensible MINORITY (by Doubling the Standard Deduction). Taxpayers will not survive this.
[EX A]:
Non-identity-attack