In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Comment: Was she? She earned it and paid taxes...that's conservative. She said things that were worth hearing based on market forces...that conservative. She was one of the smartest leaders of the free world...that merit, that's conservative values. Wow, the devil in a pants suit for sure...too conservative for me.
Non-sexual-explicit

Comment: ""Have you forgoten Okalahoma? Just a good ole country boy. lol""

And are terrorists more likely to come from Muslim countries or from Oklahoma?
Non-sexual-explicit

Comment: Yes. The institutional Church has made it quite clear that our LGBT brothers and sisters are not welcome. "Intrinsically disordered" are not loving words, and firing gays for getting civilly married to other gays is not a loving action.

One of the central themes of Christianity is love for your neighbor. The institutional Church seems to forget this at times.

Those gays who stay with the Church do so <I>despite</I> what the institutional Church says and does. They must truly be committed.

Non-sexual-explicit