instruction:
In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence can be inferred from the statement. Incorrect choices change the meaning in important ways or have details that are not mentioned in the statement. Indicate your answer as 1,2, or 3 corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.
question:
Statement: but uh that's right i'm not yeah outside of of uh pro football i'm not too interested in other games uh other sports anyway Choices:  1. I would only be interested in attending a game if it was a pro football game. 2. I'm not really interested in any sport other than pro football. 3. I like all sports except pro football.
answer:
2


question:
Statement: When you hear that despite the fact that he has economists who know better, the Justice Department's Joel Klein apparently either believes or chooses to claim that this case is about path dependence, you start to wonder. Choices:  1. Joel Klein is lying about the case, and it's obvious why. 2. Joel Klein's claim that the case is about path dependence is fully backed up by his economists. 3. Joel Klein says that this case is about path dependence, even though the economists who work for him know that isn't true.
answer:
3


question:
Statement: The agency provides free legal representation in civil cases to about 24,000 low-income people annually. Choices:  1. More than 20,000 people are provided with pro bono lawyers every year. 2. Only about 1,000 low-income individuals are given free legal representation each year. 3. About 24,000 people are given free legal services every year.
answer:

3