The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the uv-part strategy, otherwise output No. uv-part is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to undermine the requirements of the opponent. For instance, suggesting that the opponent would not need more firewood since they already have the basic supplies or a suggestion that there might be a store near the campsite where the opponent can get the supplies instead.

Input: Consider Input: Context: 'hello' 'hi' 'In this extra package I need two food'
Utterance: 'wow that is a much'

Output: Yes


Input: Consider Input: Context: 'I can't wait 🙂 Let's talk about these supplies. I've got hungry mouths to feed, Can I take the food and you can have half the firewood and all the water?' 'Hmm, I need food too. I am willing to split. I will give you 2 food since you claimed it first. Can I have 2 waters then?' 'That's fair, but I have wiggle room on the water, how about I take two food, two firewood and you take 3 water, 1 food, 1 firewood?'
Utterance: 'Is there anyway you will go with that I get two firewood? I need food the most but since you get most of that can I get most of the firewood? So 1 food, 2 firewood, and 2 water for me?'

Output: Yes


Input: Consider Input: Context: 'okay so just to be clear you get 2 foods and me 1. I get 2 firewood and you 1 and i get 2 water and you 1? Is that correct? do we have a deal?' 'On water I have not agreed. I will take 2 It will be fair☹️' 'okay thats fine. Deal?'
Utterance: 'deal🙂'


Output: No