In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Input: Consider Input: Comment: Majesctic Loucks!

Output: Non-sexual-explicit


Input: Consider Input: Comment: The author quotes a professor who states  "police reluctance to work with feminist legal groups mirrors a sentiment common to employees of any company.'   Several years ago, I attended a complaint of sexual assault where a woman called to report she had been sexually assaulted at a party.  When I got to her home, she was accompanied by a local Rape Relief representative.  As I spoke to the woman, I was continually interrupted by the Rape Relief rep, to the extent that I asked her to leave the room.  It turned out that the sex was consensual, and that the woman was actually intent on a guilt/revenge thing.  What actually happened is that following a fight with her boyfriend, she stormed off, went to the party, got drunk and had sex.  Upon returning home, she said "look what happened to me," and then reported it as a rape at the urging of her beau.   Unfounded!!!!! 
 I also told the Rape Relief worker to go ahead and complain.  She never did.

Output: Sexual-explicit


Input: Consider Input: Comment: A pervert getting away with a crime is no cause for celebration.  A "not guilty" verdict does not make the accuser innocent.  He got off on a "made-up" and manufactured technicality.  Thanks to a overly sympathetic & "politically correct"  judge.

He raped a minor .... forcing oral sex upon his victim.   To the judge I ask What part of that is so difficult to understand?


Output: Sexual-explicit