In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

[Q]: Comment: "The big bad alpha male made me wet my panties"
[A]: Sexual-explicit


[Q]: Comment: Judging by the march in San Diego, it looked like the same audience that shows up to the usual feminist/LBGQT/black lives matter protests.  If you want to be taken seriously, probably best advisable to not wear a vagina costume.
[A]: Sexual-explicit


[Q]: Comment: What's odd then is why so many lay here rail against the clerics all the time here...why are so many articles about the Vatican the bishops, the USCCB, the sisters... if the Church "has so little influence" on the ordinary life of the lay.

I agree with you that it does have little to do.

I just can't explain the almost fetishistic focus on Rome, the diocese, priests. 

The Catholic world needs to be this other world, not a now grouchy pope in Rome.
[A]:
Non-sexual-explicit