instruction:
Given a document, an entity and its sentiment towards the entity, verify if it is the correct sentiment towards the entity. Answer should be yes or no. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].
question:
Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Pope Francis Letter is Negative . Well  it’s now happened.  The great scandal of the modern Catholic Church  —  its  tolerance for clergy who abuse children  and  its  laxity when dealing with bishops who themselves tolerated or enabled priest-abusers — now touches directly on  the pope himself .
 It ’s worth laying out the timeline clearly. In 2015  Pope Francis appointed Juan Barros Madrid to the bishopric of Osorno  Chile. The appointment was met with local protests  among Catholics and non-Catholics who believed that Barros was implicated in the crimes of child sexual abuse committed by his friend Father Fernando Karadima  a prominent Chilean churchman who habitually kissed and fondled boys. In the days after the installation of Barros at Osono  Pope Francis told an archbishop that there was “no objective reason at all” to oppose the appointment. The Vatican’s own department governing these matters  the Congregation for Bishops  released a statement saying they had “carefully examined the prelate’s candidature and did not find objective reasons to preclude the appointment.”
In the months following the appointment   Pope Francis  became extremely dismissive of complaints. “Osorno suffers  yes  for silliness ”  the pope  said of the outrage in the media. “Think with your head  and do not be carried away by the noses of the leftists  who are the ones who put this thing together ” he added.
A few weeks ago   Pope Francis ’s visit to Chile was marked by protests  and  the pope  continued  his  extremely brusque dismissal. “The day I see proof against Bishop Barros  then I will talk ” the pontiff said. “There is not a single piece of evidence against  him . It is all slander. Is that clear?”  Francis  said that no victims had come forward to  him . It was apparently this statement that caused Cardinal Sean O’Malley of Boston to scramble down to Chile and meet with the pope. After O’Malley’s intervention  presumably  the pope issued a half-apology  but repeated that the accusations against Barros were “slander” before adding  “I’m convinced he’s innocent.”
And now the news drops. In the time between the pope’s appointment of Barros and his commentary about protesters being carried away by leftists  members of the Vatican’s own Commission for the Protection of Minors gathered to discuss the appointment. They had a representative hand-deliver a letter to Pope Francis  from Carlos Cruz. The letter alleged  in lurid detail  that Barros had personally witnessed the abuse of Cruz at Karadima’s hands. Members of the commission photographed the hand-off of the letter to  the pope   to reassure Cruz that they were doing everything possible to make his cry for justice heard.
The facts as we know them leave us with a few interpretations. 1)  Pope Francis  simply never read the letter  ignoring this extraordinary intervention by the Vatican’s own commission on a matter of public controversy for  his  pontificate. 2)  Francis  read the letter but forgot about it  reverting to  his  original understanding of the case. 3)  Francis  read the letter  but stuck to  his  decision for Barros  committing unintentional or intentional deceptions about the state of  his  knowledge of the accusations. 4)  He  read the letter  but either doubted the accusations in it  or at least found them so unimpressive that  he  did not decide to follow up on them.
The first explanation would mean that  Francis  was culpably ignorant. The second that  he  may lack the mental or moral faculties to competently govern the Catholic Church. The third that  he  is too stubborn or vain to change course in the face of evidence. And the last that  he  has little trust or faith in the Commission on the Protection of Minors to pass on credible counsel to  him . Perhaps more reporting or disclosure will change our understanding  but none of these are satisfactory.
answer:
no


question:
Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Kamala D. Harris is Positive . â Sen. Kamala D. Harris (D-Calif.)  on Twitter  Nov. 17
One of the most widely shared claims came from  Sen. Kamala D. Harris  who tweeted   âRetweet if you would *not* benefit from a private jet tax break â on Nov. 17  linking to a Business Insider article with the headline  âThe Republican tax bill has a provision that would end a headache for private jet owners.â  Harris âs tweet prompted nearly 69 000 retweets and more than 35 000 likes.
 Harris âs claim that the Senate bill contains a provision for a tax break on private jets comes from the Business Insider article  she  linked to in  her  tweet. The article explains how the Senate version of the GOP tax bill makes tax changes to specific industries  noting that the âthe Tax Cuts and Jobs Act would correct a long-running dispute between owners and operators of private jets and the IRS.â
 Harris  defends  her  tweet  arguing that they are simply describing the provision as it was reported in the media as a tax break. But that was not the case with the article she retweeted â which also noted that the tax provision was valued at less than $50 000 a year. Moreover  several outlets offered a detailed take on the provision  making clear it the clause aimed to settle a decades-long dispute between the IRS and private jet management companies.
Still  these tweets are not alike.  Harris  earns Three Pinocchios for referring to a âprivate jet tax breakâ and suggesting wealthy owners would gain.
answer:
yes


question:
Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Ayatollah Ali Khamenei is Negative . Supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei  accused Iranâs foes of fomenting the unrest  which began as protests about economic hardship and corruption but have grown into political rallies  some of which have criticized  him  by name.
âIn recent days  enemies of Iran used different tools including cash  weapons  politics and intelligence apparatus to create troubles for the Islamic Republic â  he  said  in  his  first reaction to the unrest.
 He  did not name the enemies but Ali Shamkhani  secretary of the Supreme National Security Council  said the United States  Britain and Saudi Arabia were behind the riots.
 Khamenei  said on  his  website that  he  would address the nation about the events âwhen the time is rightâ.
answer:

no