In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Q: Comment: I was so excited to eat at Mi Mero Mole until I found out that the owner, Nick Zukin, was racist and so dismissive of Black Lives Matter.

I'm grateful that this very real issue with Saffron has brought much more about Portland businesses into the light and caused folks to dig deeper into who they support.

Smart business owners should do the right thing and use this opportunity to sympathize with the community (who is rightfully outraged) with the result of likely earning that community's support and winning  them over to their business (much like Ristretto Roasters did) rather than PUBLICLY expressing support and shooting themselves in the proverbial foot. It doesn't look like Nick Zukin is that kind of business owner. I suppose some people just like to commit business-suicide.

It's amazing how arrogant business owners like Sally and Nick are to think that Portland has enough racists or racist-sympathizers to keep their restaurants afloat.

A: Non-sexual-explicit
****
Q: Comment: You got that right!
"They also subscribe to "no wanks", which is a rule banning masturbation."
Whatever floats their boats.

A: Sexual-explicit
****
Q: Comment: You are right Margaret - hopefully they WON'T sit down and shut up.
The empty suit, Junior Trudeau, needs a well-deserved slap in the face.

It's the lethargic electorate that got us into the Kathleen Wynne problem.
People need to wake up and smell the coffee.

A:
Non-sexual-explicit
****