We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Q: Sent1: My argument makes it clear that innocent people need not be sentenced to death in order for the death penalty to be unjust.
 Sent2: while it is a fact that innocent people have been placed and convicted to death row condemned to die, there are however people who are guilty and should die.

A: Not similar
****
Q: Sent1: Not to mention that the death penalty is more costly than simple life in prison in both money and time.
 Sent2: And no one said that life in prision is "much worse" then the death penalty.

A: Not similar
****
Q: Sent1: If I ever "murder" someone without cause, I would deserve to die.
 Sent2: "by not killing those who deserve it"....do rape victims deserve it?

A:
Not similar
****