We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

[Q]: Sent1: it has been proven time and again prisons don't rehabilitate, keeping someone in prision for their entire life in prision is less human than the death penalty.
 Sent2: First, it is more expensive than sentencing someone to life in prison.
[A]: Not similar


[Q]: Sent1: If a person wasn't convicted then they surely wouldn't be murdered by the state.
 Sent2: killing someone who has raped them or hurt a family member, while some of these reasons would definitely require being locked up the death penalty does not seem right for alot of situations
[A]: Not similar


[Q]: Sent1: It seems that there is still a majority in this country who is for the death penalty.
 Sent2: I don't see where in your first source it says that the majority of all countries (or the majority of people in every country) support the death penalty in some cases.
[A]:
Similar