TASK DEFINITION: Given a document, an entity and its sentiment towards the entity, verify if it is the correct sentiment towards the entity. Answer should be yes or no. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].
PROBLEM: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Paul Haggis is Positive . âI havenât seen that  no â the stunned Swank told Fox News at an FX event in Pasadena  Calif. of the report released just minutes earlier about  Paul Haggis   who won consecutive Oscars for screenwriting the Swank-starring "Million Dollar Baby" and writing and directing "Crash."
 Haggis  was named in a civil lawsuit on December 15  2017 by publicist Haleigh Breest  who claimed the married  64-year-old filmmaker raped her on Jan. 31  2013 in a New York City apartment.
The lawsuit spurred three more women to claim sexual assault and harassment by  Haggis .
According to the Associated Press  one of the accusers claimed  Haggis  made  her  perform non-consensual oral sex and then raped  her .
Another accuser said  Haggis  told  her  âI need to be inside  you .â  She  said  she  was able to escape.
They all said  Haggis  first tried to kiss them. In two of the cases  they said  when they fought back   Haggis  escalated  his  aggression.
The new rape accuser said she was a 28-year-old publicist working on a television show being produced by  Haggis  in 1996 when he called to ask to review photos from the show that night in her office.
When  Haggis  arrived  she said  everyone else had left the office for the night and  he  insisted they speak in a back office. She said  Haggis  began kissing her as soon as they walked into the room.
"I just pulled away.  He  was just glaring at me and came at me again. I was really resisting.  He  said to me  'Do you really want to continue working?'" the woman said. "And then  he  really forced  himself  on me. I was just numb. I didn't know what to do."
 Haggis â lawyer told the AP his client is denying the new accusations  saying  âHe didnât rape anybody.â
 Haggis  has also denied Breest's initial rape allegation in a counter-complaint to the lawsuit  and said the accuser and her lawyer had demanded a $9 million payment to avoid legal action  which he characterized as extortion.
Fox News reached out to  Haggis  and Breest but did not receive comment.
 Haggis  is also well-known for being an outspoken critic of Scientology  which  he  left in 2009.  He  is listed as currently directing the film "Lead and Copper."

SOLUTION: no

PROBLEM: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Nicki Minaj Nicki is Positive . The Case
Nicki Minaj  posted an Instagram of  herself  in front of the distinctive blue-and-white Casper mattress box on Dec. 30 with this caption: âLove it @casper havenât slept in daze.â
Casper confirmed to BuzzFeed News in an email on Monday that it compensated  Nicki Minaj  to post about the mattress. It wasnât just a gift â  she  was paid $$$.
So shouldnât  she  have disclosed it was an ad in the caption? Casper said  âWe asked that  she  include the proper disclosure (#ad) in  her  caption. After  she  posted  we reached out â early last week â to ask that  she  update the copy to clarify.â
As of yesterday afternoon   Minaj  had still not updated  her  post to say that  it  was an ad.  Her  record label did not reply to BuzzFeed Newsâ request for comment.

SOLUTION: no

PROBLEM: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Laura Ingraham is Neutral . Laura Ingraham  was one of the few people who saw Donald Trumpâs shocking victory coming. More importantly  as a former speechwriter for Ronald Reagan who saw firsthand how viciously the Bush-aligned establishment despised Reaganâs working-class voters   Ingraham  understands how powerful the conservative-populist movement is and why the elites in the permanent political class have spent gazillions and worked overtime for three decades to thwart it.
In  her  blockbuster new book  Billionaire at the Barricades: The Populist Revolution from Reagan to Trump  Ingraham  the best-selling author  explains how Trump got elected and the forces heâand other economic nationalistsâwill have to battle to implement the peopleâs agenda.
Billionaire at the Barricades is a must-read because  Ingraham   who still gets chills when she sees footage of the crowd at Kemper Arena in 1976 realizing they had nominated the wrong man in Gerald Ford  takes readers on a fast-paced journey through the 2016 campaign cycle and shows how everyone who was blindsided by Trumpâs rise should have seen it coming  especially after Dave Bratâs shocking primary victory over then-House Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-VA) in 2014.
Elites give off the impression that Trumpâs populism on the campaign trail was something they had never seen before when  in fact  every candidate who has won the presidency in the television age has been the one who was the most populist. As  Ingraham  writes  âpresidential candidates invoke the populist style because it connects with working people.â
Conservatism and populism  according to  Ingraham   âoverlap in their opposition to âbig thingsââbig government  big international organizations  big media  big business cronyism.â
Reagan understood that âthese distant  uncaring entities rob people of decision making and ignore their interests â and  Ingraham  notes that âPat Buchanan and Donald Trump summarized conservative populism best when each vowed to put âAmerica first.ââ
âConservative populists tend to support a policy of economic nationalismâpeople-centered economic policies that put the nation and its workers first. They oppose a massive national debt because it weakens America and makes its citizens beholden to lenders â  she  continues. âThey also believe high taxes are bad because they sap workersâ wages and economic freedom. Similarly  they are against huge trade deals and international organizations like the World Trade Organization because they take power out of the hands of voters and give it to a far-away and often hostile global elite.â
When it comes to foreign policy   Ingraham  explains that âconservative populists oppose broad military interventionism and believe military force should only be used when American interests are threatened.â  She  slams populismâs critics who foolishly toss around âthe term âisolationismâ to dismiss populist foreign policy â even though that label does not describe any populist  she  has ever known.
 Ingraham  points out that âthroughout the Cold War  populists were among the strongest voices opposing Soviet communism.â In addition  populists have always believed that âsquandering the nationâs wealth and blood on un-winnable wars and nation-building is unwise. Instead  they support a pragmatic foreign policy based on achieving âpeace through strengthâ by maintaining a strong military and using it prudently.â
Unfortunately  as  Ingraham  details  âsome conservatives took a dangerous detourâ and âthrust us into a bizarre world of globalization  wars based on idealism and nation-building  and intense hatred toward the very voters who accounted for the Reagan coalition in the first place.â
The betrayal started almost immediately after George H.W. Bush won Reaganâs third term. The Bush administration purged Reaganites  and  Ingraham  recalls that Margaret Tutwiler told Reaganite Ed Rollins at a party that âthere are a lot of us who had to suffer during the eight years of Reagan  and now itâs our turn.â
âWe were Reagan people. They were Bush people. We all knew what the differences were â  Ingraham  writes. âMany of the GOP Establishment types who behind closed doors scoffed at Reagan as a dim-witted former actor with anââultraconservativeâ outlook were now working in the Bush administration. They thought it was time to return the Republican Party to what they believed was its more genteel  respectable roots. In effect  it meant the return to power of the Rockefeller Republicans who had worked to deny Reagan the presidency in 1976.â
Bushâs Office of Management and Budget Director Richard Darman convinced Bush to infamously abandon his âread my lipsâ pledge not to raise taxes  and  in the end   Ingraham  argues that âGeorge H. W. Bush stalled the conservative-populist engine that powered Reaganism.â As Rollins said  âGeorge Bush was the beneficiary of the greatest baton pass in presidential history in 1988  and he and his people tossed it away.â
âGlobalism is fundamentally anti-American because it aims to raze American sovereignty by atrophying our ability to take independent actions that are in our nationâs best interests â  Ingraham  writes  pointing out that globalists do not understand that âbecause of the enormous anti-American sentiment around the world  itâs almost impossible to create a multinational organization where U.S. interests donât become compromised or harmed.â
Just like his father  George W. Bush campaigned as a populist but governed as a globalist.  Ingraham  blames âBushâs decision to aggressively pursue amnesty after his unpopular warâ for insulting the âmillions of conservative-populists who had worked so hard to put him in power.â
âBecause of Bush  conservatives lost everything â  she  continues. âWe lost the House. We lost the Senate. And we lost the White House.â

SOLUTION:
no