In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

[EX Q]: Comment: Vow Donald Trump's face is as flaccid as his
penis.
It's probably the same color.
[EX A]: Sexual-explicit

[EX Q]: Comment: Ty Cobb, like the famous baseball player? He had steel balls too!
[EX A]: Sexual-explicit

[EX Q]: Comment: Bill C-22 was a dangerous bill which the Liberals should not have supported in the first place.   Since they did, and since they said they would modify this bill for transparency and oversight, these measures are simply NOT good enough.

During Bill C-22 introduction, Many posted (including me) that it is dangerous because it would allow a Govt to spy on whomever it wished without adequate oversight.   CPC Partisans, like Joe Dick below, mocked anybody who voiced these concerns even when it was pointed out that these same powers could be used AGAINST even the CPC when they lost power.    It simply gives the Govt too much power regardless of party.

Citizens of all political stripes, even hopeless partisans like Joe Dick, need to let their MP know that these measure are not enough.    It's a shame that it took an election loss for CPC partisans like Joe Dick (and millions like him) to realize that mindlessly cheering a CPC Bill and mocking those who were against it was a mistake.
[EX A]:
Non-sexual-explicit