In this task, you will be shown a sentence, and you should determine whether it is overruling or non-overruling. In law, an overruling sentence is a statement that nullifies a previous case decision as a precedent by a constitutionally valid statute or a decision by the same or higher ranking court which establishes a different rule on the point of law involved. Classify your answers into overruling or non-overruling
--------
Question: however, we now specifically overrule the holdings in the case of city of kingfisher v. altizer, 13 okla. 121, 74 p. 107, and other cases of similar import of effect that plaintiff in an action for personal injury need not in any case submit to a physical examination.

Answer: overruling


Question: rules declared valid  smith, john, judge  minnesota department of public safety jack y. perry, jason r. asmus, briggs and morgan, p.a., minneapolis, minnesota (for petitioners) lori swanson, attorney general, stephen d. melchionne, assistant attorney general, st. paul, minnesota (for respondents) considered and decided by halbrooks, presiding judge; rodenberg, judge; and smith, john, judge.

Answer: non-overruling


Question: consequently, to the extent that miller or perez can still be read as authority for overlooking a party's failure to make a timely and specific objection to the admission of evidence at trial and subsequently preserve the issue for appellate review by including it in a 1925(b) statement to which the trial court responds, their rationale for overlooking waiver is disavowed.

Answer:
overruling