Categorize the comment on the basis of severe toxicity. If the comment is severely toxic output Yes, otherwise output No.

[EX Q]: Realize that the unfunded liability is mostly not about the retirement system at all.  It is about massive errors by actuaries and bad behavior by politicians.  Cleaning it up is a multi-billion dollar mess that local agencies are responsible for technically.  The amount of money can potentially swamp their budgets.  The state SHOULD be covering all of it, but they "pass" money back to local governments and school districts and then "take" it again.  This artificially inflates the numbers Mr. Boyle likes to use, suggesting the school boards actually see and use that money.  They don't.
This is weaseling back on their own problem, dumping it to locals, and they have to do stuff like that late in the session without input, because the more people get a chance to understand it, the less they like legislators.
[EX A]: No

[EX Q]: Public notice in our current legislature is informing the public after hearings or changes are over and done with except of course for those brave and selfless servants known as lobbyists.
[EX A]: No

[EX Q]: Always easier to throw stones as someone else's income huh, Ridgefield?  How about we take a good bite out of yours and see how that makes you feel.
[EX A]:
No