In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.

Q: Comment: The overwhelming majority of Canadians supported not allowing Jewish refugees in the 1930s. I think opinion have changed since then. 

As for the niqab, I agree that it is in violation of the Canadian belief system. So are Amish or Mennonite values. But I don't have a problem with how those communities behave.

Finally, how many of these regressive countries have you visited? Or has your knowledge been gathered from provocateurs like Margaret, or news channels like Fox and Breitbart?

A: Disagree
****
Q: Comment: Its mostly the same people running it.

A: Agree
****
Q: Comment: It is called the "law of unintended consequences".....and the real problem is Trump's "populist" views that sound good, are actually counter productive, and the second more important real problem is he has no clue regarding the first problem.  He is shooting from the hip with sound bytes, photo ops, and rhetoric while behind the scenes already beginning to create real havoc.  This and he is a low point in US leadership, in my view.

A:
Agree
****