In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

[Q]: Sentence: I poured water from the bottle into the cup until it was full.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the cup because The cup is not capable for getting the bottle water. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
[A]: Correct


[Q]: Sentence: Emma's mother had died long ago, and her education had been managed by an excellent woman as governess.
 Reason: The 'her' refers to emma because Emma's mother is dead. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
[A]: Correct


[Q]: Sentence: Frank felt crushed when his longtime rival Bill revealed that he was the winner of the competition.
 Reason: The 'he' refers to bill because Bill was the winner of the compettition. So frank felt crushed. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
[A]:
Correct