In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Ex Input:
Comment: Who gives a darn about the so called three founding nations. There is blatant bigotry and hypocrisy when that term "founding nations" is used as a smoke screen for racism. My family has been here for well over two hundred years. Does that give me license to discriminate against others? No!  If ratepayer’s referendums were the standard for zoning changes, NIMBYs would stop 90 of all development. In this case the referendum was invoked, because of local resistance (code word for racism) to the development. The referendum was used by weak politicians for cover.

Ex Output:
Obscene


Ex Input:
Comment: And I lost my arse when I partnered in a Jeffrey Dahmer cookbook.

Ex Output:
Obscene


Ex Input:
Comment: I would love to see just one Trump voter admit out loud that they made a terrible mistake, starting with high ranking elected republicans.  Trashing our relationship with Mexico is horrible for our country.  It hurts us.

Ex Output:

Non-obscene