In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: insult and non-insult. Insult is any lanugage or act that is disrespectful or scornfully abusive.

Input: Consider Input: Comment: The core is summed up near the end, where she writes she wants to bring Justin Trudeau's quota system, for insisting on plentiful women Cabinet Ministers, into science:

"We led by example with the first ever gender-balanced Cabinet (and with) the first feminist international-assistance policy [which sees the VAST majority of Canada's foreign aid aimed at women and girls!!!]. Science would benefit from adopting a similar approach..."

Hello?

Does the writer think Canadians are blind, lacking in memory?

Look, when Justin Trudeau came to his senses months later, he TERMINATED women cabinet ministers from their posts for lackluster performances and REPLACED them. VERY EMBARRASSING and VERY MALADAPTIVE MESSAGE for gender relations in Canada. 

And the writer wants to bring THAT MESS to universities? With SEXIST grant funding akin to Liberal foreign aid ?

I thought Trudeau's team was all about "evidence based" government. Hello? We have seen the evidence. Quotas are sexist and awful.

Output: Insult


Input: Consider Input: Comment: I brought up "rape and pillage" -- defined often as "to strip ruthlessly of money or goods" or "plunder".  You twisted it to the strict definition of "rape", not I.  I will give you that Trump wants to change the "standard", not (yet) the "law".  You still haven't owned that you brought up something as happening while Clinton was "in the white house", but the alleged timing of the event preceded Clinton taking office by four years.

I am having a fine day, thank you very much.  I wish you the same.

Output: Non-insult


Input: Consider Input: Comment: In other words, he is just flat stupid.


Output: Insult