We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Example Input: Sent1: If someone is bad enough to be considered for the death penalty then they must have had sure evidence that they are guilty if they are then they shouldn't deserve the right to live among people they could kill
 Sent2: If a person commits murder, I don't believe they deserve to live.
Example Output: Similar

Example Input: Sent1: If they know they'll die if caught, they'll likely kill more rape victims and children.
 Sent2: If a person wasn't convicted then they surely wouldn't be murdered by the state.
Example Output: Not similar

Example Input: Sent1: It's been determined the death penalty is economically inefficient and I have yet to see any solid statistics displaying a defined deterrent factor.
 Sent2: The way I see it, capital punishment doesn't have to be expensive at all.
Example Output:
Not similar