In this task, you're given a context passage, followed by a question that needs to be answered. Based on the paragraph, you must write unambiguous answers to the questions and your answer must refer to a specific phrase from the paragraph. If multiple answers seem to exist, write the answer that is the most plausible.

Kai crowded around Sydney to help conserve heat. 
Question: How would Sydney feel as a result?
felt warm

The book is written in three parts. "Book One: The Romantic Egotist"—The novel centers on Amory Blaine, a young Midwesterner who, convinced that he has an exceptionally promising future, attends boarding school and later Princeton University. He leaves behind his eccentric mother Beatrice and befriends a close friend of hers, Monsignor Darcy. While at Princeton he goes back to Minneapolis, where he re-encounters Isabelle Borgé, a young lady whom he had met as a little boy, and starts a romantic relationship with her. At Princeton he repeatedly writes ever more flowery poems, but Amory and Isabelle become disenchanted with each after meeting again at his prom. "Interlude"—Following their break-up, Amory is shipped overseas, to serve in the army in World War I. (Fitzgerald had been in the army himself, but the war ended while he was still stationed on Long Island.) Amory's experiences in the war are not described, other than to say later in the book that he was a bayonet instructor. "Book Two: The Education of a Personage"—After the war, Amory falls in love with a New York debutante named Rosalind Connage. Because he is poor, however, this relationship collapses as well; Rosalind decides to marry a wealthy man, instead. A devastated Amory is further crushed to learn that his mentor Monsignor Darcy has died. The book ends with Amory's iconic lament, "I know myself, but that is all". 
Question: What war was taking place?
World War I

Jess said : I mean , feminism is supposed to be egalitarian , maybe we shouldn't be anointing great women for the rest of us to look up to , like they make history and we don't - particularly if we're trying to empower women , the concept of the hero is very disempowering , and - one of the only times I'd use the word - quite patriarchal . " I do agree with this , but perhaps there are ways to highlight the good things people have done without casting them as heros , per se . I am fully against the individualisation of historical change ( i.e. this person caused X to happen , rather than X happened , these people were there ) . 
Question: What might happen after you explain feminism to Jess ?

She would share her criticisms .