In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Input: Consider Input: Comment: With a lot of Anchorage now stoned on pot , pills , and booze---with free unearned cash to pay for it all thanks to the PFD-----it's little wonder they think life is wonderful here. With a full PFD check Anchorage might have jumped up the charts to number one . Today's Alaskan's don't face life head on . They have to use drugs to get by.  Shame on us all for celebrating our drug culture .

Output: Non-sexual-explicit


Input: Consider Input: Comment: And don't forget, nearly EVERY hand you have ever shook has touched a penis! GASP!
Worried about bacteria? Wash your hands, wash your bags; it's not that hard, dude.

Output: Sexual-explicit


Input: Consider Input: Comment: HV says that a primary reason for having intercourse is procreation. This stems from Gnosticism and Roman stoicism, neither of which thought much of sex. The Gnostics thought that "the flesh" was evil; and the Stoics thought that anything as pleasurable as sex was to be avoided, but could be justified by saying it was for procreation. These ideas, promulgated by heretics and paganss, were taken up by Christian ascetics who also distrusted pleasure. Augustine, in one of his sermons, says that a man should look forward to heaven where he can embrace his wife as if she were a statue.

The ideas that being "open to procreation" is desired by God is unsupported by anything in scripture. It is a wholly man-made concept, stemming from the thought that sex is nasty.

RD trots out the standard traditionalist twaddle in support of this.


Output: Sexual-explicit