In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: threat and non-threat. Threat is a statement that someone will be hurt or harmed, especially if the person does not do something in particular.

[EX Q]: Comment: a'Toole endorsing o'Toole
[EX A]: Non-threat

[EX Q]: Comment: When I said I am not pro-Jewish I also said I wasn't anti-Jewish. I to be "pro" something requires me to want more of it - which I don't because it's not MY decision to make. How many children Jewish people have is entirely THEIR decision and I respect that.

I believe, above all, in live and let live.
But live-and-let-live is a form of tolerance. Tolerance is a peace treaty. I'll let you be whoever the hell you want to be, think whatever you want, believe whatever crazy stuff you want and defend your right to do so.
But like any peace treaty, it can only apply to others who sign onto the same thing. You must agree to do the same for me. 

You believe in Jesus ? Good for you. You try to make LAWS to force ME to obey what you say his laws are: we have a problem.
You believe in Allah ? Good for you. You try to interfere in my life because of it - problem.

The vast majority of all people accept the treaty. The minority of fundamentalists do not and get no tolerance.
[EX A]: Non-threat

[EX Q]: Comment: You must be male. Your favorite politicians certainly want dominion over my body and all other women's. So I guess your idea of "slavery" and "tyranny" is sliiiiiiggghhhhtttttllllyyy different from mine. I have this silly idea that I should make my own decisions about my own body; your people think otherwise. So give me liberty, or kindly give YOU death.
[EX A]:
Threat