In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.

Ex Input:
Comment: Good points, why did the Globe ignore the latest example of Liberal excess, $212 K paid to an advertising firm for artwork on a budget cover. Trudeau is wasting $30 billion a year on higher government expenses and he's attacking small businesses in a cynical political ploy that would bring in $250 million. Trudeau's original tax the rich/cut middle class taxes resulted in a $1.8 billion hole in the treasury so similar results could be expected from the new plan. Meanwhile Trudeau dithers while Canada's oil and gas sectors are under assault by foreign-backed career activist parasites all the while Quebec's CO2 emitters get government subsidies (Bombardier and Quebec's new concrete plant with direct ties to Bombardier family). There are 40,000 illegal migrants in Canada that wait an average 16 months for a hearing - the welfare alone costs taxpayers $300 million/year and Trudeau does nothing, just like the Liberals do nothing about the growing industry of birth tourism for passports...

Ex Output:
Agree


Ex Input:
Comment: Clearly, you have no understanding of this issue.  Just one more opportunity for fake outrage by the Haters.

Ex Output:
Disagree


Ex Input:
Comment: "You have to ask a question of me first – because you get a chance to talk to the Prime Minister,"

This response epitomizes everything that is wrong with Trudeau...  a  man with a child like mind playing dress up.

Ex Output:

Agree