In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.
--------
Question: Comment: Citizens of countries with one electoral authority,  compulsory voting and  only one method, paper or electronic, have no excuse for the idiots they elect.

Answer: Non-identity-attack


Question: Comment: The YouTube picture of the idiot in a business suit pretending to hump the Fearless Girl statute is in such bad taste that it defies description.

Answer: Non-identity-attack


Question: Comment: Really??  Well, according to my "history" - which granted is not as expansive as Disqus' was - it's two in this silly discussion with you.  I did have 2 removed with kag, again after being approved by our peers - but I was advised to put them back up...So I did, and they are still there, so I didn't count them since they are there.

I wonder if it's after approval flagging that's occurring?  Have you been busy!!!!  😀 No, policing comments is not my stratagem...Apparently, it IS yours.  I don't go back and flag previously approved statements - if that is what happened.  We'll find out from CC.

Yes, I did write the Tablet was liberal.  Where did I ever write "facts" were...Which is what YOU accused me of?

That dishonesty thing? You may want a mirror....

Answer:
Non-identity-attack