Given a sentence, an entity and its sentiment towards the entity, verify if it is the correct sentiment towards the entity. Answer should be yes or no. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

Example Input: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Hillary Clinton is Positive . This was a straightforward case of criminal intent. Negligence was the fallback position â for a prosecutor  an âeven ifâ theory  as in: âEven if youâre not convinced by our overwhelming evidence of  Clinton âs willfully illegal retention and transmission of classified information  you can still comfortably find  her  guilty if you conclude that  she  was grossly negligent â which  as the judge will tell you in his instructions  simply means âextremely careless.ââ
Example Output: no

Example Input: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Joel Fuhrman is Neutral . The solution hiding in plain sight â a nutrient-dense healthful diet â can save lives and enable humans to reach their intellectual potential and achieve successful and fulfilling lives.  Dr. Fuhrman  offers a life-changing  scientifically sound approach that can alter American history and perhaps save your life in the process.
Example Output: no

Example Input: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Travis Kalanick is Positive .  Kalanick : I think it starts with understanding that the world is going to go self-driving and autonomous. Because  well  a million fewer people are going to die a year. Traffic in all cities will be gone. Significantly reduced pollution and trillions of hours will be given back to people â quality of life goes way up. Once you go  "All right  there's a lot of upsides there" and you have folks like the folks in Mountain View  [California ] a few different companies working hard on this problem  this thing is going to happen.
Example Output:
yes