TASK DEFINITION: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.
PROBLEM: Comment: I also applaud Ab. Chaput.   But why call this a  a progressive issue?  This is the response anyone should have to racist hate.  It's what any Christian, any reasonable person of any religion should have to Nazi rhetoric.

SOLUTION: Non-obscene

PROBLEM: Comment: Hmmm what kills more alcohol or marijuana?  What a joke!!!  Ain't no damn Schedule I to put that with the other street drugs out there DAMN THE SYSTEM!

SOLUTION: Obscene

PROBLEM: Comment: "The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar Left, and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black. But by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders, raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."   - John Erlichman, Counsel and assistant to Richard M. Nixon

The lies never stop. Alcohol, cigarettes, and pharmaceutical opiates are all big business - and all proven killers and destroyer of lives.  Pot, however, continues to be vilified - and somehow it continues to be vilified by those who profit from cigarettes, alcohol, pharmaceutical opiates, and the criminal justice system.

SOLUTION:
Non-obscene