In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

Q: Comment: I think you'll find the great majority of terrorist activity is homegrown white males.

Are you suggesting that the shooter in Quebec City was a Radical Islamist? Or Marc Lepine?

How about Timothy McVeigh?

All Jihadis are not Muslim, there are many Christian fundamentalists who use their religion as a motivation for mass killings.

A: Identity-attack
****
Q: Comment: Totally agree...he can't accept any blame whatsoever....let's just blame the black guy....as of today:  his OWN REPUBLICAN leaks from the White House are Obama's fault (are you kidding me?) and the botched raid in which a SEAL died last month is the military's (and Obama's, by the way !!!) fault!!

A: Identity-attack
****
Q: Comment: That's irrelevant.

It's not newspapers or broadcasters that determine the legal use of the term; it's the university that grants the degree.  You're clearly ignorant of the history of the term 'doctor' and its origin in the medieval church run universities. You originally applied to teach at the university, were tested for competence, and if you passed, were declared a 'doctor', because the Latin term was directly tied to your licence to teach. The Latin 'docere' is the root, meaning "to teach".

MD, JD and PhD all got the term the same way - because they were all taught at universities that employed 'doctors' licensed to teach those subjects at those universities.  If a student studied long enough that the existing doctors deemed them worthy, they themselves could then teach.

And you were one wiki or Google search away ...

A:
Non-identity-attack
****