In this task, you will be shown a sentence, and you should determine whether it is overruling or non-overruling. In law, an overruling sentence is a statement that nullifies a previous case decision as a precedent by a constitutionally valid statute or a decision by the same or higher ranking court which establishes a different rule on the point of law involved. Classify your answers into overruling or non-overruling

Input: Consider Input: for all the foregoing reasons, friesen v. city of glendale, supra, 209 cal. 524, is overruled and lombardy v. peter kiewit sons' co., supra, 266 cal.app.2d 599, is disapproved to the extent that they are inconsistent with the views herein expressed.

Output: overruling


Input: Consider Input: in people v king, 384 mich 310, 312-313; 181 nw2d 916 (1970), the supreme court did not find it unduly suggestive when, after the witness made his identification, it was indicated to him that he had identified the individual whom the police suspected.

Output: non-overruling


Input: Consider Input: thus, the presence of an ambiguity in a contract does not always indicate a structural failure; it could just as easily mean that the parties intended to be bound to arbitrate and that the trial court, as the outside interpreter of the contract, should admit parol evidence to shed light on that contract's limits.


Output: non-overruling