In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Input: Consider Input: Comment: Prorogue
Harper proroguing Parliament was to stop an UNDEMOCRATIC attempt by the sore losers to form a Coalition to steal the election from the winning Conservatives
.
it was pathetic watching such "democrats" as Chretien and Ed Broadbent trotting up Parliament Hill with that intention
.
Proroguing by Harper is a tool in the Rule Book, so it is not undemocratic at all

Output: Non-obscene


Input: Consider Input: Comment: The best way to solve this is to get rid of Trump.  He has shown that he cannot tune down the bellicose rhetoric.  He cannot and will not step back.  but he will forge on until he presses the button of his own demise.  God bless America - they damn-well need it!

Output: Obscene


Input: Consider Input: Comment: Doesn't matter who's at QB when 1.) that line couldn't block a pee-wee team and 2.) it's the same bullshit play-calling each week.


Output: Obscene