In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine the neutral choice based on your inference from the statement and your commonsense knowledge. The neutral choice is a sentence that neither agrees nor disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3', corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence. If sentence X agrees with sentence Y, one's correctness follows from the other one. If sentence X disagrees with sentence Y, they can not be correct at the same time.

[EX Q]: Statement: Accordingly, sections 203 and 204 of the act, which require agencies to consult with small governments and solicit input from State, local, and tribal governments, are also inapplicable. Choices: 1. Sections two hundred three and two hundred four are inapplicable. 2. Sections five hundred and five hundred one are inapplicable, sections 203 and 204 are fine though. 3. The sections of the act required extensive changes.
[EX A]: 3

[EX Q]: Statement: In addition, comprehensive, timely information on incidents can help federal and nonfederal analysis centers determine the nature of an attack, provide warnings, and advise on how to mitigate an imminent attack. Choices: 1. Information on incidents would not help any analysis centers determine the nature of an attack. 2. Comprehensive, timely information on incidents can help federal and nonfederal analysis centers determine the nature of an attack. 3. Information on incidents should be recorded by all managers.
[EX A]: 3

[EX Q]: Statement: Only a well-armed and convoyed set of wagons with a highly experienced and competent master could dare travel the Apache-infested trails these days. Choices: 1. Only a top level wagon could travel these trails. 2. Anyone could travel these trails safely. 3. Only the best wagons could travel these trails without speaking to the natives first.
[EX A]:
3