Given a document, find the main entity about whom the author is writing. Write the full name if mentioned in the text. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].
--------
Question: Alabama defensive lineman Raekwon Davis (99) sacks Clemson quarterback Kelly Bryant (2) in the first half of the Sugar Bowl semi-final playoff game for the NCAA college football national championship  in New Orleans  Monday  Jan. 1  2018. (AP Photo/Butch Dill) (Photo: The Associated Press)
NEW ORLEANS (AP) — For Clemson quarterback  Kelly Bryant   replacing Deshaun Watson was never going to be easy.
 Bryant  played well enough to get Clemson to a third straight College Football Playoff meeting with Alabama — and then it all went wrong.
 He  was intercepted twice — with both turnovers leading to Alabama touchdowns — and was sacked a season-high five times in a 24-6 loss in the Sugar Bowl on Monday night.
This season  they met in a CFP semifinal with  Bryant  hoping to lead the ACC champs past an Alabama squad that made it this far despite finishing second to Auburn in the Southeastern Conference's West Division.
Coming in   Bryant  had accounted for 3 504 yards and 24 touchdowns from scrimmage this season: 2 678 yards and 13 TDs through the air  and 826 yards and 11 TDs on the ground.
 "Kelly Bryant   I think  he  is actually a little more athletic than Deshaun Watson.  He 's definitely faster and  he  likes to run " Alabama defensive back Anthony Averett said. "We disguised very well and confused  him  a little bit and I think that made a difference."
 Bryant  finished with 18 completions on 36 passes for 124 yards.  He  also was held to 19 yards rushing against Alabama  whose swarming defense unsettled  him  much of the night.
"It was just us making critical errors and shooting ourselves in the foot "  Bryant  said. "We had great play calls but everybody wasn't on the same page. We'll learn from it."
Both of  Bryant 's interceptions occurred on altered or tipped passes.
The first came when Jennings hit  Bryant 's arm as he released the ball. The errant pass fluttered to Payne  who returned his interception 21 yards — 2 yards more than  Bryant 's longest completion of the game.
Later   Bryant 's pass intended for Deon Cain was tipped by Levi Wallace and intercepted by middle linebacker Mack Wilson  who ran it back 18 yards to make it 24-6 in the third quarter.
 Bryant  was nearly intercepted again  one play after Jennings had taken the QB down for the fifth time in the game.  Bryant 's pass under duress almost looked as if it were intended for Alabama's Wilson  who saw a chance for his second interception of the game bounce off his hands.
 Bryant 's New Orleans nightmare ended with a fourth-down incompletion from the Alabama 5-yard line with 1:43 to go. But even if he had finally gotten the Tigers in the end zone  it would have been far too late.

Answer: Kelly Bryant


Question: Justice Department special counsel Robert Mueller broke his own record this week for guilty pleas. On Tuesday  Dutch attorney Alex van der Zwaan appeared in federal court and admitted he had lied to investigators about his contacts with  Donald Trump's former campaign vice chairman  Rick Gates .
On Friday   Gates himself  appeared before a federal judge and confirmed that  he  is changing  his  plea to guilty.  He  had been fighting the case brought against  him  and the former Trump campaign chairman  Paul Manafort  which alleged they laundered millions of dollars and broke other laws related to their work for clients in Ukraine.
 Gates  and Manafort have not been charged with conspiracy to defraud the U.S. by "impairing  obstructing and defeating the lawful functions of the government through fraud and deceit for the purpose of interfering with the U.S. political and electoral processes." That was the charge Mueller leveled at 13 Russians and three Russian companies he says did interfere with the election.
Or the special counsel's office could be laying down one brick in a larger structure. At the very least   Gates'  future testimony against  his  longtime business partner raises the likelihood that Manafort could be convicted of some or all of the charges  he  continues fighting.
Manafort and his lawyers know this. So one of Mueller's strategies in getting  Gates  to turn state's evidence might be to persuade Manafort to do the same and tell what he knows about other people in the Trump campaign orbit.
Or evidence from  Gates  might be what the special counsel's office needs to build a case against Manafort for conspiring in the 2016 Russian interference effort. Or  after years of working with Manafort   Gates  might have other evidence that would permit Mueller to bring new charges against Manafort.
Mueller announced a new indictment in Manafort's case on Friday evening. After  Gates  appeared in federal court Friday to enter his plea  Manafort continued to maintain his innocence and said he remained committed "to defend myself against the untrue piled up charges contained in the indictments against me."

Answer: Gates


Question: âIt doesnât even look like  her .â
That one comment  culled from thousands online about  Baltimore artist Amy Sheraldâs portrait of Michelle Obama  unveiled today at the Smithsonian Instituteâs National Portrait Gallery  sums up a familiar response to the publicâs often less-than flattering responses to portrait painting.
In  the portrait    Mrs. Obama  sits in a custom dress designed by Millyâs Michelle Smith of bold geometric shapes   her  expression challenging the viewer.  Her  face and skin are grey  as Sherald often paints  her  subjects.
It doesnât look exactly like  her   it doesnât look exactly not like  her . It is a representation of Mrs. Obama  who sat for Sherald the artist  and the responses to the result sum up the tension between artist and sitter and artist and spectator  too.
Holland Cotter  art critic for the New York Times  said  Mrs. Obama âs portrait face was too far removed from the real one.
This gets at the central tension of the art of the portrait. Just how much should a portrait be about physical likeness  versus conveying psychological truth  or an insight into character? The furor over  Michelle Obamaâs  portrait suggests we want a portrait to deliver the first above all else.
What peopleâs kvetching comes down to: this painting isnât enough like a photograph. The spirit that  Mrs. Obama  represented to so many seems lacking in the more restrained  removed spirit of Sheraldâs work. But the public face of  Michelle Obama  isn't the only face. Sherald is arguably trying to show us another face.
In this sense  Kehinde Wileyâs accompanying portrait of  Barack Obama  is seen as more successful. It looks more like the photographic  Barack Obama  we know. Here  any outrage voiced seems to have been about the background  which features flowers from three significant places to  him : Kenya  Hawaii and Chicago.
"I tried to negotiate less gray hair and Kehinde's artistic integrity would not allow ( him ) to do what I asked "  Obama  said. "I tried to negotiate smaller ears. Struck out on that as well."
Both painters aimed to do something beyond simple replication for their portraits. The backdrop of a bush  or garden  endows  Barack Obama  with a literal life force. The garden is green and vibrant behind  him . The setting is entirely complimentary to  his  persona; in the painting  he  is sitting forward  alert.  He  is fixing us with a wizened glare. This garden is pure Obama Zen.
 Mrs. Obama âs portrait is starker  and psychologically richer. "Amy  I want to thank you for so spectacularly capturing the grace and beauty and intelligence and charm and hotness of the woman I love " Mr. Obama said.
 Mrs. Obama  said  she  hoped "girls and girls of color" would âsee an image of someone who looks like them hanging on the walls of this great American institution ... And I know the kind of impact that will have on their lives because I was one of those girls.â
In  her  remarks   Mrs. Obama  acknowledges what  her  portraitâs detractors do not; that a painting such as this is a distillation rather than impersonation. It is the personâs spirit in the moment of sitting  rather than a literal embodiment of that person.
If you really feel that Michelle Obamaâs portrait is a dud  the queen got it far worse in George Condoâs portrait of her  envisioning her with a huge neck and bulbous cheeks and chin. A Cabbage Patch Doll  scoffed the critics.
You may not think  Michelle Obama  looks much like  herself  in this new portrait   she  may not be the public  Michelle Obama  you have seen and responded to  but at least  she  doesnât look like someone or something else entirely.

Answer:
Michelle Obama