Categorize the comment on the basis of obscenity. If the comment is obscene output Yes, otherwise output No.

[EX Q]: Stoltz is an embarrassment of  a politician; he doesn't want to do his job.  
I'm sickened he represents me.
[EX A]: Yes

[EX Q]: Boo hoo, Hillary is so "uninspiring" and lord knows (infantile) Americans must be "inspired." The problem is the overactive and ideological imagination of the populace. Hillary Clinton will continue the policies of Barack Obama and if Americans find this state of affairs unsatisfactory they only have lack of political involvement and naivete to blame. Finally, the Republican party's backwardness is coming home to roost and what do we see? A bunch of ideological idiots on the so-called American "left" fantasizing that a country where fanatics shoot doctors and women seeking abortions is going to turn into a Sweden-style social democracy in the course of a single presidential election. Now is the finally the moment for the Democratic party to take over the political center (a strategic move for the future) and lo and behold the Sanders people have arrived to screw that up. Never underestimate the ability of Americans to shoot themselves in the foot.
[EX A]: Yes

[EX Q]: What we need is a totally new political party or option for voting. I call in the N.O.T.A. Party or None Of The Above Party. Then we can tell the parties to start again and don't e so stupid next time around.
[EX A]:
Yes