instruction:
Given a document, an entity and its sentiment towards the entity, verify if it is the correct sentiment towards the entity. Answer should be yes or no. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].
question:
Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Clinton is Negative . NEW YORK (AP)  â Hillary Clinton  says  she  should not have let a senior campaign adviser keep  his  job after a female staffer accused  him  of sexual harassment in 2007.
"The most important work of my life has been to support and empower women  " Clinton  wrote on Facebook Tuesday night . "So I very much understand the question I'm being asked as to why I let an employee on my 2008 campaign keep his job despite his inappropriate workplace behavior. The short answer is this: If I had it to do again  I wouldn't."
 Clinton  said that senior campaign staff and legal counsel confirmed that the behavior by faith-based adviser Burns Strider had occurred after the woman came forward. Her campaign manager recommended that Strider be terminated  but  Clinton  said  she  instead demoted him  docked his pay  required counseling  separated him from the victim  and warned him that he'd be fired if he did it again.
 Clinton  said that there were no further complaints against Strider during the rest of the campaign  but that  she  is troubled that  he  was terminated from a job leading an independent political action committee supporting  Clinton  for inappropriate behavior several years later.
"I believed the punishment was severe and the message to  him  unambiguous. I also believe in second chances "  Clinton  said in the post published shortly before the start of President Donald Trump's State of the Union address. "But sometimes they're squandered."
 She  said that the reoccurrence of the behavior "troubles me greatly" and leads  her  to question whether it would have been better if  she  had fired him.
"There is no way I can go back 10 years and know the answers. But you can bet I'm asking  myself  these questions right now."
 Clinton  said that  her  first thought after the Times report "was for the young woman involved" and that she reached out to her "to see how she was doing  but also to help me reflect on my decision and its consequences."
"She expressed appreciation that she worked on a campaign where she knew she could come forward without fear "  Clinton  said. " She  was glad that her accusations were taken seriously  that there was a clear process in place for dealing with harassment  and that it was followed. Most importantly   she  told me that for the remainder of the campaign  she flourished in her new role. "
answer:
no


question:
Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Taya Kitman is Neutral . Fish came in to work  and  Taya Kitman  a high-ranking staffer  at the time  and two other employees were in the conference room waiting for  him . They needed to prepare the 400-person seating chart for the organizationâs annual gala.  Kitman  wanted to get  it  done and pressed Fish to help  her . Fish seemed annoyed by  her  request.
Fish  who is well over 6 feet tall  approached  Kitman  from behind  put his hands around  her  neck and applied pressure  according to four people with knowledge of the incident.
One person said Fish meant it as a joke  but took it too far. He left red marks on  Kitman âs neck  the four sources said. Shaken by the encounter   Kitman  tried to downplay  it .
Board member Victor Navasky and The Nation Instituteâs lawyer at the time were briefed the following day about the incident. They told Fish to apologize  and  Kitman  didnât want to take things further.
In an email to HuffPost  Fish said: âThe incident with  Taya Kitman  did not happen as described.  Taya  has been a friend and colleague of nearly 20 years  I have the utmost regard for  her  and the work  she  had done at the institute. We were partners in building the organization and we continue to collaborate on projects that we created together. I know it sounds self-serving  but anyone who knows me knows I would never harm a woman or another person.â
 Kitman  declined to comment.
Reached by phone last week  Navasky praised Fish and insisted he didnât know anything about the alleged physical altercation between Fish and  Kitman . âI donât know what youâre talking about  so thereâs nothing to deny or not deny â he told HuffPost on Friday. âThe Nation Institute is a private thing and the trustees arenât supposed to talk about anything that happened there  and Iâm obeying their rules. But Iâm just telling you that Hamilton was a great partner for me. Period.â
 Kitman  is now executive director of the institute.
âI know that  Taya  recognized that Ham was a problem and did everything she could to get him out of there â Berman said. âThings have been much better since  Taya  took over. Sheâs respected by the staff. Sheâs respected by the fellows. Sheâs respected by the donors. Sheâs very hardworking.  Taya  is literally the exact opposite of Ham  and I mean that in the best way possible about her.â
Berman added: âWhen  Taya  took over  the office became a lot more functional and pleasant to be in.â
After this story was first published   Taya Kitman  released the following statement:
answer:
yes


question:
Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Elizabeth Warren is Positive . Six years ago  the contested story of Sen. Elizabeth Warren's Native American heritage began its rise from local newspapers to national headlines  and eventually into presidential speeches and Twitter feeds.
On Wednesday   Warren  raised the subject  herself  — not budging from the story  she  has relayed for years — in a surprise speech to the National Congress of American Indians.
And I want to make something clear. I respect that distinction. I understand that tribal membership is determined by tribes — and only by tribes. I never used my family tree to get a break or get ahead. I never used it to advance my career ”  Warren  said.
The stories  she  grew up with are real   Warren  said  which is what  she  has regularly said on the matter. There is no known documentation of  Warren ’s Native American ancestry (though somewhere in the 2012 back-and-forth a genealogist estimated  Warren  was 1/32 Cherokee)  but the senator has steadfastly argued that she was raised on stories of Native American family members and this is what she knows to be her family's heritage.
 Warren  has been adamant about the pride  she  feels to be Native American — though the topic has dogged  her  politically. At the event  a days-long policy summit in Washington  D.C.  attended by a wide range of tribal leaders   Warren  described  her  dedication to fight against the “country’s disrespect of Native people.”
“For far too long  your story has been pushed aside  to be trotted out only in cartoons and commercials ”  she  said.
 Warren  used President Donald Trump’s nickname for  her   Pocahontas  as an example of the disrespect.
The questions began  however  four years earlier. At the time  the Republican incumbent senator of Massachusetts  Scott Brown  was up against  Warren  for the senate seat. He brought up  Warren ’s undocumented claim of Native American heritage in a debate and asserted that she’d been using it to get ahead in jobs.
The main evidence of  Warren ’s use of  her  heritage was to list  herself  as a minority in a legal directory in the 1980s and 90s.  She  was later described as the only minority female faculty member at Harvard Law School in a 1996 survey report on diversity.
 Warren  has repeatedly denied that  she  ever used it to advance  her  career. “All I can say is  I busted my tail as a teacher. I am qualified for my job "  she  said in 2012.
On  her  family   Warren  said  “They’re gone  but the love they shared  the struggles they endured  the family they built  and the story they lived will always be a part of me. And no one — not even the president of the United States — will ever take that part of me away.”
answer:

yes