Given a document, an entity and its sentiment towards the entity, verify if it is the correct sentiment towards the entity. Answer should be yes or no. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

[EX Q]: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Frederica Wilson is Neutral . A video shows that White House chief of staff John Kelly was wrong about Rep. Frederica Wilson's 2015 speech.
The video shows  Wilson  took credit for fast-tracking an FBI building's naming process rather than securing its funding.
White House chief of staff John Kelly's claim that  Rep. Frederica Wilson  had boasted about procuring funding for an FBI field office in 2015 was proven wrong by a video released by The Sun Sentinel on Friday  backing up  Wilson 's claim that  she  had only taken credit for working across the aisle to name the building after two FBI agents who were killed in the line of duty.
Kelly called  Wilson  an "empty barrel" on Thursday and rebuked  her  for taking credit for securing funding for the future FBI building.  Wilson   however  shot back and denied the claim  which was corroborated by the video of  her  speech.
The video shows that  Wilson  described how  after  she  was informed of the long process it would take to finalize the building's name   she  "went into attack mode."
"Immediately I went into attack mode... They hotlined it to the Senate floor in just two days "  she  said in the speech. "And guess what? The president signed the bill into law this past Tuesday  April 7th  2015  with a bang  bang  bang!"
 Wilson  was elected to Congress in 2010  one year after the funding for the building was secured  according to CNN.
The White House stood by Kelly's characterization of  Wilson 's speech.
"Gen. Kelly said he was 'stunned' that  Rep. Wilson  made comments at a building dedication honoring slain FBI agents about  her  own actions in Congress  including lobbying former President Obama on legislation " press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders said in a statement sent to Business Insider. "As Gen. Kelly pointed out  if you're able to make a sacred act like honoring American heroes about yourself  you're an empty barrel."
The back-and-forth between  Wilson  and Kelly follows another feud between the Florida congresswoman and President Donald Trump himself  in which  Wilson  criticized Trump for making an insensitive call to the widow of a fallen US soldier.
[EX A]: no

[EX Q]: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Pope Francis Letter is Negative . Well  it’s now happened.  The great scandal of the modern Catholic Church  —  its  tolerance for clergy who abuse children  and  its  laxity when dealing with bishops who themselves tolerated or enabled priest-abusers — now touches directly on  the pope himself .
 It ’s worth laying out the timeline clearly. In 2015  Pope Francis appointed Juan Barros Madrid to the bishopric of Osorno  Chile. The appointment was met with local protests  among Catholics and non-Catholics who believed that Barros was implicated in the crimes of child sexual abuse committed by his friend Father Fernando Karadima  a prominent Chilean churchman who habitually kissed and fondled boys. In the days after the installation of Barros at Osono  Pope Francis told an archbishop that there was “no objective reason at all” to oppose the appointment. The Vatican’s own department governing these matters  the Congregation for Bishops  released a statement saying they had “carefully examined the prelate’s candidature and did not find objective reasons to preclude the appointment.”
In the months following the appointment   Pope Francis  became extremely dismissive of complaints. “Osorno suffers  yes  for silliness ”  the pope  said of the outrage in the media. “Think with your head  and do not be carried away by the noses of the leftists  who are the ones who put this thing together ” he added.
A few weeks ago   Pope Francis ’s visit to Chile was marked by protests  and  the pope  continued  his  extremely brusque dismissal. “The day I see proof against Bishop Barros  then I will talk ” the pontiff said. “There is not a single piece of evidence against  him . It is all slander. Is that clear?”  Francis  said that no victims had come forward to  him . It was apparently this statement that caused Cardinal Sean O’Malley of Boston to scramble down to Chile and meet with the pope. After O’Malley’s intervention  presumably  the pope issued a half-apology  but repeated that the accusations against Barros were “slander” before adding  “I’m convinced he’s innocent.”
And now the news drops. In the time between the pope’s appointment of Barros and his commentary about protesters being carried away by leftists  members of the Vatican’s own Commission for the Protection of Minors gathered to discuss the appointment. They had a representative hand-deliver a letter to Pope Francis  from Carlos Cruz. The letter alleged  in lurid detail  that Barros had personally witnessed the abuse of Cruz at Karadima’s hands. Members of the commission photographed the hand-off of the letter to  the pope   to reassure Cruz that they were doing everything possible to make his cry for justice heard.
The facts as we know them leave us with a few interpretations. 1)  Pope Francis  simply never read the letter  ignoring this extraordinary intervention by the Vatican’s own commission on a matter of public controversy for  his  pontificate. 2)  Francis  read the letter but forgot about it  reverting to  his  original understanding of the case. 3)  Francis  read the letter  but stuck to  his  decision for Barros  committing unintentional or intentional deceptions about the state of  his  knowledge of the accusations. 4)  He  read the letter  but either doubted the accusations in it  or at least found them so unimpressive that  he  did not decide to follow up on them.
The first explanation would mean that  Francis  was culpably ignorant. The second that  he  may lack the mental or moral faculties to competently govern the Catholic Church. The third that  he  is too stubborn or vain to change course in the face of evidence. And the last that  he  has little trust or faith in the Commission on the Protection of Minors to pass on credible counsel to  him . Perhaps more reporting or disclosure will change our understanding  but none of these are satisfactory.
[EX A]: no

[EX Q]: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Jerry Jones is Neutral . A group of NFL owners led by Jerry Jones  the Dallas Cowboys owner   are reportedly making moves to stall the contract extension of commissioner Roger Goodell  and  they âre citing the mishandling of player protests among  their  reasons.
How are  the owners  pushing against Goodell?
According to the New York Timesâ Ken Belson   Jones  has hired a powerful lawyer and threatened to sue the NFL over Goodellâs contract extension.
 Jones  is angry because of the suspension of Cowboysâ running back Ezekiel Elliot over allegations of domestic violence  and also over mismanagement of the controversy stemming from player protests during the national anthem.
 Jones  also tried to thread the needle over the protests by appearing on field with  his  players to kneel before the national anthem was sung  and then standing together during the anthem. Afterward  he  said that any player who would be seen protesting during the anthem would be benched.
[EX A]:
no