You are given first 5 messages from a series of message exchanges between 2 persons playing the game of Diplomacy which is an American strategic board game. You need to generate the next message. The message should be generated such that it fits the context seen so far. Avoid the text that is (i) tangent to the context, (ii) repeats the context.

[EX Q]: ['Hello Russia!  I’m curious as to how you like to play this game?  I’m often a big fan of the A/R alliance: Turkey is a great initial target, Germany second, with Italy coming next after that for me and England next for you.  Lots of possibilities!  Any thoughts?', 'Greeings Austria!\n\nI agree the old Jug is a little obvious, I do believe that A/R is a lot more flexible for both of us ! \n\nHow do you envision a 1901?', 'We could bounce in Gal, as that’s a fairly safe way to maintain those two units in a rearguard position, for starters.  Then there’s Turkey: if I can convince them that you’re going north so that they can move quickly with their fleets with me (ie Ank-Con) then you could just *take* BLA, which would speed up this whole endeavor right away.  If we don’t think they’ll do that (or you don’t want to lie in 01), you two could just bounce there and go to Mos-Ukr while I go to Ser, then in the Fall you could either take Rum with the fleet (so you can force BLA), or else I support you into Rum from Ukr while going for BLA again.  Of course, Italy goes Trl and Ven right out of the gate, I won’t be as useful an ally to you ;p', 'Any thoughts on 1901 moves?  Germany and Italy both seem content to play cautiously (so they say: the Anschluss "hold in Munich" from Germany, and "how about a Lepanto?" from Italy), and Turkey is making friendly sounds but nothing concrete.  You feeling like the typical "3 units south" approach, so we can pick apart Turkey? I don\'t seen any obvious E/G fighting right out of the gate to give you an easy opening into Scandanavia (as cool as that would be - A/R alliances where R gets in the west early can do some fun things...)', 'Agreed on the bounce in Gal. Yeah if you can convince turkey to move F to Con that would be great!']
[EX A]: Are you worried that Italy will disrupt you this spring?

[EX Q]: ['Hello friend. I’m a big fan of early cooperation between us early on. If we end up fighting over the channel, Germany usually swoops in with Russia. What do you think about a DMZ in the channel?', 'Sounds good', 'That went well. We can keep the DMZ in the Channel, it looks like its working well for both of us, and Germany might have some problems coming up', 'Sounds great. I’m still chatting with Germany and Russia to see what’s gonna happen up north.', 'sounds good']
[EX A]: Things are shaking out strange up north. You seem to have some Italian troubles. Have you spoken with Italy to find out where his fleets are headed?

[EX Q]: ["Hello, England! What's your general train of thought on what to do?", 'Not quite sure yet to be honest -- still trying to get to know the board', 'Any ideas on your end?', "My inclination is to focus south. I won't put an army in StP, you don't put an army in Norway. Fair deal?", 'That sounds good to me']
[EX A]:
I just hope you're not planning a Juggernaut ~~ then it'd be almost irresponsible of me to not do anything ya?