In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: toxic and non-toxic. Toxicity is defiend as anything that is rude, disrespectful, or unreasonable that would make someone want to leave a converation.

Example Input: Comment: Idiot...why do these idiots think they can run off to avoid capture?  They get nailed every time...one more idiot to furnish meals to....
Example Output: Toxic

Example Input: Comment: CommonWetDreams.org is a completely lame citation.

Try some hard facts instead, It was desperate and huge turnout by white evangelicals in the "firewall" states that put Trump over. 

These fanatics were hardly going to vote for Sanders, who was even more aligned with the "Black Devil" in the White House.

Clinton won the vote of the lower income segment and all race/cultural minorities. Sanders wouldn't have done better.

-- Paul
Example Output: Non-toxic

Example Input: Comment: Boeing could care less what Sajan and trudeau think of them. Canadian military wouldn't pay the bar bill for Boeing executives. Inconsequential... Look up the definition. The one thing any one can derive from the last 18 months, Trudeau and his cabinet have accomplished zero. Except they have borrowed 30 billion more to pay for an unsustainable budget. Bombardier is on corporate welfare. Has been for past 30 years. Boeing has a case. Like Trump says, play fair.
Example Output:
Non-toxic