We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Example Input: Sent1: i think that life without opportunity of parole is the more humane and just punishment instead of the death penalty.
 Sent2: People generally think that the death penalty is worse than life without parole (certainly most criminals seem to think so).
Example Output: Not similar

Example Input: Sent1: One way that would make me happy with the death penalty is if the person was killed in the same way as the person that they murdered.
 Sent2: Capital punishment is killing someone as a punishment for a crime they committed.
Example Output: Not similar

Example Input: Sent1: The death penalty has been used as a scapegoat for many people who are against executions.
 Sent2: The person who said that the death penalty should be used for people who are convicted of multiple-burglaries sounds like a complete knucklehead.
Example Output:
Not similar