We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

Ex Input:
You argue that people cannot be trusted with guns, because they might injure themselves in accidents (hence the 4.46 figure).

Ex Output:
Valid


Ex Input:
Or that someone has pointed out that gun rights advocates seem to have been panic-buying firearms in case the White House bans them?

Ex Output:
Valid


Ex Input:
The fact that somebody's willing to break the law and make a profit is reason enough to ban a legal product?

Ex Output:

Valid