TASK DEFINITION: We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.
PROBLEM: Sent1: Those who claim that Australia suffered a "crime wave" as a result of new gun laws often cite as evidence unrelated figures for common assault or sexual assault (no weapon) and armed robbery (any weapon).
 Sent2: Muggings, burglaries, rapes, assault and battery are all examples of violent crimes that don't require a gun.

SOLUTION: Not similar

PROBLEM: Sent1: So if you want to ban guns, 1,531,764 people will get killed or injured, and you'll only take guns out of the hands of those who don't even commit gun crimes.
 Sent2: You can debate that without guns there would be more deaths to other weapons although you can't debate it would be to the same extent as gun murders and crimes would be.

SOLUTION: Not similar

PROBLEM: Sent1: I also say that when people commit a crime with a gun these people need to be punished not the law-abiding citizens!
 Sent2: And as far as carrying in public, as long as I have commited no crime, then why should anyone need know I have my gun.

SOLUTION:
Not similar