In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: toxic and non-toxic. Toxicity is defiend as anything that is rude, disrespectful, or unreasonable that would make someone want to leave a converation.
--------
Question: Comment: "You should be applauding the proposed immigration reform, not condemning it. Yet you criticize a plan put forth by Senators Cotton and Perdue" -- Thor52

You questioned the writer's motive. The writer's motive is to condemn the proposed bill.
Why should Mr. Connolly applaud the policy if he disagrees with it? Why shouldn't he criticize Senators Cotton and Perdue? That is still legal in this country.
You criticized former President Obama often. You criticize Democratic lawmakers all the time. You label them "liberal" and dismiss them.
Well, others can play the same game.

"Mr. Connolly, you sound like, from your own words, like the very kind of person Senators Tom Cotton and David Perdue want migrating to our country." -- Thor52
LOL
Have you read about the proposed bill? Mr. Connolly is far from the type of immigrant Senator Cotton and Senator Perdue want. Mr. Connolly came here with no useful skills and penniless. The two senators want technically skilled or wealthy immigrants only.

Answer: Non-toxic


Question: Comment: They're living it over in Santa Clara, making converts, and making intentional disciples out of nominal cradle-Catholics.  Right now, today, not in some bygone era.  

And the situation was similar across the bay from there at St. Edward's in Newark before a real clericalist character (who hates the rail...) was made pastor in 2015.  (Is 2015 a bygone era?)  The building was a Protestant-style prayer barn but with a sanctuary rail and some improvements, the community was active, people were getting on fire for the faith, and nobody in his right mind thought of that rail being about the personal elevation of the priest over the laity.

OLOP isn't my parish (and by choice, since it's closer than where I go) but I can't say they're not doing some things right.

Of course one could always mention Cantius as another example.  And for all practical purposes that parish community dates to the Bernardin era in Chicago.

Answer: Non-toxic


Question: Comment: what an idiotic statement.  I thought protecting the innocent was in everybody's interest.  Maybe I am the idiot.

Answer:
Toxic