Given a document and an entity the task is to select the author's sentiment towards the entity. Sentiments can be Positive, Neutral and Negative. Select Positive if the article expresses a positive view towards the given entity or praises its quality or skills. Select Neutral if the document expresses no clear view towards the entity or has equal amounts of positive and negative statements or expressing some fact/quote by someone else. Select Negative if the article expresses a negative view towards like harsh remarks, criticizing entities action/decision etc. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

[EX Q]: What is the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Alec Baldwin Alec ? Actor Alec Baldwin  discussed rampant allegations of sexual misconduct with Megyn Kelly on her NBC morning show Thursday and stated that  while many perpetrators have admitted their guilt  there are innocents who stand accused of sexual impropriety.
Earlier this week   Baldwin  shared a Twitter update calling out late-night TV hosts â such as Stephen Colbert and John Oliver â over their propensity to act as figurative grand juries with regard to targets of sexual misconduct allegations.
 Baldwin  tweeted Wednesday: âTalk shows were once promotional pit stops for some blithe chit chat about movies  etc. Now the likes of @iamjohnoliver and @StephenAtHome have flipped that and they are beginning to resemble grand juries.â
What did  Baldwin  say to Kelly?
 Baldwin  told Kelly that  he  stands by  his  tweet and added that  he  doesnât want to âsee people who are innocent get into trouble.â
âI do find that  that whole issue  which is a big can of worms to open up really  it is really  really tough  because you certainly want to see everyone who is guilty of something  who have done bad things  wrong things that hurt people  you want to see those people get punished â  Baldwin  explained. âBut I donât want to see other people get pulled into that who â¦ thereâs a lot of accusations and no proof yet  I donât want to see people to get hurt.â
 He  added  â[People] think that those hosts of those shows are perfectly â not only within their rights â but itâs very attractive or very necessary for them to be pressing this cause. I just donât want to see people who are innocent get into trouble.â
 Baldwin  pointed to embattled film producer Harvey Weinstein and the plethora of accusations laid against  him .
âLike Weinstein  for example  is in a rehab hiding behind millions of dollarsâ worth of lawyers â  Baldwin  explained  âand I want to see the people who really did something get convicted.â
 He  added  âI mean I want the people who are in the wrong  I want them to be punished  but I donât want to see innocent people get hurt either.â
[EX A]: Neutral

[EX Q]: What is the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Bridget Guzior ? Bridget Guzior  the 29-year-old head cheerleading coach at Stagg High School in Palos Hills   had been suspended without pay since Aug. 30 after a text  she  sent a student athlete less than two weeks earlier was brought to the district's attention.
The text message in question  according to a notice of dismissal the district sent  Guzior  on Oct. 17 that was provided to the Daily Southtown by  her  legal team  reads as follows:
The board's statement goes on to say that  Guzior 's "failure to attend a required investigatory conference" and  her  "inadequate recordkeeping in connection with the cheer program" also contributed to the board decision to terminate  her  employment.
The cheerleading coach and  her  attorney Tom Skallas did not attend Tuesday's special meeting  but did provide a written response to the board's charges that laid out their side of the story.
In that letter  which the Southtown obtained from  Guzior 's legal team  Skallas wrote that  Guzior  had been hospitalized days before the scheduled investigatory conference and that attending the meeting "would have further exacerbated Coach Guzior's health issues." He wrote that  Guzior  offered to provide answers to the district's questions in writing  only to be rebuffed.
Skallas also rebutted the board's accusation that  Guzior  had failed to maintain accurate records of the cheerleading program's accounts  writing  "At no time have district officials provided  Coach Guzior  with any specific allegations that any accounts were inappropriately handled."
In its prepared statement  the board conceded that while  Guzior 's recordkeeping "violated district policies and establish (sic) procedures " that "no financial improprieties have been alleged or found."
The district did not immediately respond to a request for evidence of  Guzior 's "inadequate" recordkeeping.
Orloff said his and his son's experience with  Guzior  had been "absolutely fantastic " and credited  her  for turning around the school's cheerleading program.
" She  has motivated (my son) to excel  not only in athletics but in his scholastics " he said. " She  actually cares about every member of that team  how they do  what their futures are  helps promote the children for colleges.  She  goes above and beyond  which I have not seen in too many coaches over the years."
Orloff said his primary hope going forward is that the district applies the standard it applied to  Guzior  to all of  its  coaches.
[EX A]: Positive

[EX Q]: What is the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Daniel O'Neill ? Daniel O'Neill â an economist at the University of Leeds in the United Kingdom â and several collaborators came up with 11 indicators that a country has met the needs of its citizens. They range from boosting life expectancy above age 65 to ensuring that at least 95 percent of its adult population has graduated from high school  has access to sanitation and earns more than the extreme poverty line of $1.90 a day.
From that  "we can calculate a carbon budget for the rest of the century " notes  O'Neill . And then dividing that by the number of people on the planet  "we can say  'OK  this is the carbon budget per person.' "
Unfortunately  "we really didn't find that " says  O'Neill .
"It's a worrying finding " says  O'Neill . But  he  cautions against concluding that there is simply no way for everyone to enjoy a decent life without destroying the planet. After all  these findings are based on how we are doing things now   he  says.
And  he  adds that this study actually points to one way to do that. Specifically   O'Neill  and  his  fellow researchers ran statistical tests to determine for each environmental measure how much damage it takes to produce a corresponding improvement on each of the social well-being indicators.
"And what we find is that it follows a curve of diminishing returns â as you use more resources you get less social bang for your buck " says  O'Neill . "So there's a turning point after which additional resource use contributes very little to social performance." Wealthy industrialized nations such as the United States  the United Kingdom and Canada have reached that point  says  O'Neill . "As we increase our resource use  we get almost no increase in human well-being from that."
And this means for these countries the strategy of growing the economy â basically trying to create new wealth â to boost the well-being of their underprivileged citizens is ineffective. A much better approach  argues  O'Neill   would be to focus on redistributing their existing wealth more equitably.
And if high-income countries were to adopt such an approach  says  O'Neill   they could reduce their use of resources. And that   he  says  would "free up the ecological space" for poor nations  where using resources still does make a big impact in improving people's lives.
[EX A]:
Neutral