We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Q: Sent1: Although there is much controversy about him, I agree that prisons, especially for those for whom the death penalty could be considered, should be punishment.
 Sent2: I will agree that the death penalty is too arbitrarily applied.

A: Not similar
****
Q: Sent1: I assume in what follows that we, the country or the state, execute only for the crime of murder, though many capital punishment adherents would use it for other crimes, such as child rape, treason, arson, robbery and even fraud.
 Sent2: That should be a crime which should result in the death penalty.

A: Not similar
****
Q: Sent1: Sorry for the length of the post, but I hope it helps you understand why I oppose capital punishment.
 Sent2: If you accept vengeance as a reason for punishment then I understand why you would support the death penalty.

A:
Not similar
****