In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

Q: Comment: Upon what evidence do you base your opinion that her response was "phony?"  Or that it was "outrage?"  The outrage that YOU are expressing shows an appalling lack of sensitivity on your part.  Why defend rudeness?

A: Non-identity-attack
****
Q: Comment: I've been a tory voter since the 60's and I've just one thing to say. I'm finished with the bad-mouthing, negative bollocks coming out of the CPC. I'm going to have a terrible choice to make come 2019. The liberal free spending but ultimately positive agenda or the negative, vitriolic politicking of the CPC. I yearn for the days of Stanfield, Clark and even Mulroney. The change came when the reform party changed the conservatives for ever. Out went the caring, conciliatory conservatives and in came the nasty attack dogs of Manning and Harper. Maybe it's time for a fourth party in Canada. Bring back the Progressives and give us Red Tories a party to vote for.

A: Non-identity-attack
****
Q: Comment: Two things seem obvious. 

Women are completely free to fly fish, or not. Their choice.

Companies like Orvis would love to see more women fish....because they would sell more equipment, and not for any other reason.

A:
Non-identity-attack
****