In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

[Q]: Comment: Sorry, I consider a woman loose if she sleeps around a lot with different partners.  She seems to be concentrating more or less on one partner at a time.  Don't see anything wrong with that.  By the way did you wait until marriage before you had sex?  Just curious. 

Perhaps that is wrong with so called conservatives.  :-)
They haven't kept up with the times.  No wonder they tend to be so cranky.
[A]: Non-identity-attack


[Q]: Comment: Mr. Trump repeatedly exposes himself as a crude, crass misogynistic lout.  To note that those are unattractive characteristics in a Presidential candidate doesn't constitute "character assassination."  If you're not bothered by his values, that's your choice.  If you actually share his misogynistic view of women, that's your choice.  

Your defense of Trump is pathetic....the old "hey, everybody does it" sounds like a plea to a Junior High School vice principal.  No, Dun., not everybody is as crude and crass as Donald Trump.  
I know hundreds of men and, over my 74 years I've never been around someone who has made comments like Mr. Trump's.  

He's surrounded by sycophants (that's PC for #@$#kissers) so those comments have been accepted and reinforced.  The man is pathetic....but, that hardly qualifies him to be president.  He's embarrassing enough as a candidate.  It's simply unthinkable that he could be president.
[A]: Non-identity-attack


[Q]: Comment: Then why, pray tell, the suicides because of bullying on social media?  You don't need a bullet, when you have the "word," and the tongue to project it
[A]:
Non-identity-attack