TASK DEFINITION: In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.
PROBLEM: Sentence: I stuck a pin through a carrot. When I pulled the pin out, it left a hole.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the pin because They stabbed the carrot. Logically a hole would be left. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

SOLUTION: Correct

PROBLEM: Sentence: John hired Bill to take care of him .
 Reason: The 'him' refers to john because Bill is the closest thing that has been established to whom John actually is, and it was Bill who. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

SOLUTION: Correct

PROBLEM: Sentence: Frank felt vindicated when his longtime rival Bill revealed that he was the winner of the competition.
 Reason: The 'he' refers to frank because he was the only winner to win the 'he' competition. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

SOLUTION:
Wrong