Given a document, an entity and its sentiment towards the entity, verify if it is the correct sentiment towards the entity. Answer should be yes or no. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

Example Input: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Alena Berlanga is Neutral . Alena Berlanga   a Floresville resident who was monitoring the chaos on a police scanner and in Facebook community groups  said everyone knows everyone else in the sparsely populated county. Sutherland Springs has only a few hundred residents.
"This is horrific for our tiny little tight-knit town " said  Alena Berlanga . "Everybody's going to be affected and everybody knows someone who's affected "  she  said.
Regina Rodriguez arrived at the church a couple of hours after the shooting and walked up to the police barricade.  She  hugged a person  she  was with.  She  had been at an amusement park with  her  children when  she  heard of the shooting.
 She  said  her  father  51-year-old Richard Rodriguez  attends the church every Sunday  and  she  hadn't been able to reach him.  She  said  she  feared the worst.
Example Output: no

Example Input: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Team Trump is Neutral . As Hanson explains  using a document paid for by the Clinton campaign (the discredited Russian dossier)  the Obama administration engaged in an unprecedented abuse of power through the FISA courts as a means to spy on the  Trump  campaign  and  as we now know  this of course included actual wiretaps.
This brazen spying and the overall Russia hoax was almost certainly the âinsurance policyâ Strzok and Page discussed with McCabe in the event of an unlikely  Trump  victory.
But even if  Trump  had lost  that policy was still going to be used by President Hillary and  her  minions within the media and federal law enforcement as a bludgeon to personally destroy  Trump  as a Russian stooge â and by extension  to destroy his MAGA movement  which terrifies the political and media establishment even more than the Tea Party.
However   Trump  did win  and as we now know  almost immediately after this victory the âinsurance policyâ was given the green-light. The first wave of this insurance policy came in the form of unceasing leaks to the Deep Stateâs most reliable co-conspirators â a compliant media.
If they did not already know  it was through these illegal leaks that the media learned that the Obama administration had spied on  Team Trump  both during and after the election. Although they now regret reporting this fact  we know the media knew about Obamaâs spying because  time and again and again  the media gleefully reported the fact that the Obama administration had spied on  Team Trump  (these media reports are all documented in detail here).
You see  in their own fevered minds  the media seemed certain that if the public was told that  Trump âs collusion with the Russians was so serious  his  team had to be surveilled by federal law enforcement   his  presidency would be over even before it began. Hence  the insurance policy.
What the Deep State and its media collaborators did not count on  though  was  Trump .
On March 4  early on a Saturday morning   Trump  tweeted  âTerrible! Just found out that Obama had my âwires tappedâ in Trump Tower just before the victory. Nothing found. This is McCarthyism!â â and this tweet blew the #ReleaseTheMemo scandal wide open.
So soothed were media provincials by the velvet-lined bubbleâs reassurance that  Trump  had no chance of becoming president  they did not plan far enough about what to do if  Trump  won.
And so  after  Trump  did win  for two whole weeks  the media did something it had not done for eight years  albeit accidentally â told the truth about the Obama administrationâs unprecedented politicization of the surveillance state.
Example Output: no

Example Input: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Thomas F. Veale is Neutral . In an email Thursday to  The Associated Press  Col. Thomas F. Veale  said the coalition reported to the Russians the buildup of the pro-government forces in the area before the attack  and communicated with them during and after it. The Russian officials offered assurances that they would not engage the coalition forces in the area   Veale  said.
âPro-regime forces initiated hostilities with artillery pieces (howitzers). Additionally  Syrian pro-regime forces maneuvered T-55 and T-72 main battle tanks with supporting mortar fire in what appears to be a coordinated attack on Syrian Democratic Forces approximately 8 kilometers (5 miles) east of the Euphrates River de-confliction line in Khusham  Syria â  Veale  said.
Asked if Russia was responsible for not stopping the attack   Veale  said: âThe de-confliction effort has served its purpose. Just as the coalition does not direct the operations of the SDF  the Russians do not direct operations of the Syrian regime.â
 Veale  said  they  suspect the Syrian pro-government forces were trying to seize terrain from the U.S.-backed forces liberated from IS militants last year  including major oil fields in the area.
Example Output:
yes