TASK DEFINITION: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.
PROBLEM: Comment: Really glad to see all of the Hillary lovers are out today,  I would much rather vote for an business person who can create jobs, one thing the article didn't mention is the thousands of people who made a lot of money off Trump's entrepreneur's acumen,  bankruptcy's laws are created for people who make mistakes or their timing is off or misjudgements in business,  most of the time who gets burned is greedy people looking for a big payoff,  not the small investors,  the fact remains he is still standing and still creating jobs and moving forward,  now Hillary makes bad judgements with people's lives and government money and continues to lie, cheat, steal and she is still standing,  so who do you vote for,  that is the question.

SOLUTION: Non-sexual-explicit

PROBLEM: Comment: If you think Trump isn't going to turn around and blow smoke up your ass the moment he's elected, you're being played.

SOLUTION: Sexual-explicit

PROBLEM: Comment: .

A Survivors perspective...
First of All, "This is about the RAPE of VULNERABLE CHILDREN, Physical, Mental & SPIRITUAL" ! Not clergy abuse, it's Child Rape. Which is a Felony Crime, not a SCANDAL.

Second, "it's now over 20 years since Fr. Tom Doyle blew the whistle down in Louisiana." And where are we? The Church is still playing "word games".
 - and didn't the Vatican jettison another of its diplomats "Last week" on a Red Eye back to Rome after he was caught with Child Porn in Wash. D.C.?

***This has been "one HELL OF A RIDE," Compliments of the Church & Vatican's Ceaseless, Constant LIES & Well Developed Policies of Criminal Cover-Up.

The cHURCH, Vatican & Pope "Have NO Credibility ! ! !
...cant shine sh!t.

.

SOLUTION:
Sexual-explicit