In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine the neutral choice based on your inference from the statement and your commonsense knowledge. The neutral choice is a sentence that neither agrees nor disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3', corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence. If sentence X agrees with sentence Y, one's correctness follows from the other one. If sentence X disagrees with sentence Y, they can not be correct at the same time.

Input: Consider Input: Statement: And Slim said, "It was not--"   Choices: 1. "It was--" Slim said. 2. Slim said, "It was not an intentional act." 3. "It wasn't--" Slim stated.

Output: 2


Input: Consider Input: Statement: Or does life, in general, figure out the trick of using oxygen and growing big and brawny? Choices: 1. The use of carbon dioxide and growing small and skinny are just some of the qualities of the human body. 2. The use of oxygen and growing big and brawny are just some of the qualities of the human body. 3. Is there a trick of using oxygen that life has figured out?

Output: 2


Input: Consider Input: Statement: A statement that successfully picks its way across this dangerous terrain is said to exhibit an economy of truth , and a person who has uttered such a statement is said to have been economical with the truth . These characterizations, too, were originally conferred with a sense of professional appreciation (I first heard them on the lips of some Jesuit friends), but they have also been pulled out of truth's orbit and into the atmosphere of mendacity. Choices: 1. Someone who is economical with the truth cannot be honest. 2. My Jesuit friends had no idea about the statements. 3. I heard this characterizations from some Jesuit friends.


Output: 1