In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Q: Comment: midas1, you are clearly in need of help.  Attacking an individual who doesn't agree with you is cowardly.   I feel very sorry for you.

A: Non-sexual-explicit
****
Q: Comment: All the 'legal' and philosophical arguing going on related to this article is nauseating. Everyone step back for a moment and think - the fact that the current legal system requires "proof beyond doubt" that a stranger raped someone who's  extremely intoxicated IS the problem. The victim was intoxicated and had hired a taxi to be taken home. The victim ended up naked and the taxi driver had sex with her. Evidence showed that. It was plain wrong. NO WOMEN CONSENTS TO SEX WITH A RANDOM STRANGERS. (outside sex trafficking-don't go there) Our criminal justice system is seriously flawed. Many sick, depraved people are out on the street, and dealing with our children, our seniors, and our family members because of it. Let's look at how the system is messing up in the NUMEROUS case like this one...Arguing the woman's drunkenness does not change the fact-some pervert who could drive your daughter to a back alley one day too had sex with this women when he should not have

A: Sexual-explicit
****
Q: Comment: The Pope Emeritus most certainly did not approve of their use.  The use of a condom by  two men having sex and a man and a woman having normal intercourse is completely different. In the first instance it is not a contraceptive device whereas in the second it is.

A:
Sexual-explicit
****