We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

[Q]: Sent1: I also don't think someone has been put to death for a third degree murder.
 Sent2: I don't think everyone should be put to death.
[A]: Not similar


[Q]: Sent1: Only .06% of people who have killed kill again when they escape, are released, etc.
 Sent2: If it must be, then we shall find a way to improve these peoples habits, not kill them because they aren't 'like us'.
[A]: Not similar


[Q]: Sent1: First, we must choose to use executions because they may save innocent life.
 Sent2: People use the argument that we should not execute people based on the possibility that they may be innocent, but they could care less if we lock someone up for life who may be innocent.
[A]:
Not similar