TASK DEFINITION: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gay Marriage) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gay marriage. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gay marriage.
PROBLEM: Why, then, is it wrong to once again evolve our definition of marriage to include two consenting adults, regardless of race and sexual orientation?

SOLUTION: Valid

PROBLEM: One one hand you seem to think that gay people don't have the right to get married at all--they do because you can get married anytime you want.

SOLUTION: Valid

PROBLEM: There Is no justification (other than religious, which should be irrelevant to law-makers) for a taboo against gay marriage.

SOLUTION:
Valid