In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Ex Input:
Comment: Being rich and famous doesn't make you smart, capable, or even a nice person.  We should all know that now.

Ex Output:
Non-obscene


Ex Input:
Comment: Maybe mom can get off her ass and make dinner

Ex Output:
Obscene


Ex Input:
Comment: Some of the dissidents in 'first world' countries are executed as well.  If we (rightfully) consider the Native peoples of the United States dissidents (for contesting the repeated  revision of treaties by the federal govt), then what does that make US/us?   Execution doesn't necessarily need to be a firing squad.  

I do agree with your other points, though.  And, in similar concert, though 'commie' China continues to restrict its people, it has evolved significantly since Nixon's trip there.  Odd how China started down a more ~civil course of economics, while Russia remains grotesquely corrupt.  (China isn't perfect or even remotely so... but Russia is downright evil)

Ex Output:

Non-obscene