TASK DEFINITION: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.
PROBLEM: Comment: Here is another one that doesn't care to check data or present proof. Isn't it time we demand from these charlatans the good-old obligation of no lying?

SOLUTION: Non-sexual-explicit

PROBLEM: Comment: You could have that too.  All you need is brains and balls.  And not be a whiner.  Guess you wouldn't fit.

SOLUTION: Sexual-explicit

PROBLEM: Comment: This is pathetic, although it's become the norm around here. (Who can forget the drunk who spent hundreds at a strip club before spreading a homeless man all over the street with his car and then falling asleep, only to receive a month or two of probation?) She's got at least one prior DUII (the first one is wiped from the record, so the fact that one is there probably means she has two), she committed hit and run, a felony, and then tried to frame an innocent person. Just how depraved does one have to be to get a prison sentence around here? Perhaps being white and female played roles in this farce.

As far as promising to not drink, how about we follow North Dakota's lead here and put an anklet on her that automatically reports any drinking? Her word seems about as valuable as dirt, so distrust and verify seems in order.

SOLUTION:
Non-sexual-explicit