The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the uv-part strategy, otherwise output No. uv-part is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to undermine the requirements of the opponent. For instance, suggesting that the opponent would not need more firewood since they already have the basic supplies or a suggestion that there might be a store near the campsite where the opponent can get the supplies instead.

[Q]: Context: 'I need an extra supply of food, as I exercise a lot! 🙂' 'Hmmm.  And the firewood?' 'I get cold easily. I need the firewood to get warm. I might catch a cold.🙂'
Utterance: 'I think water should be your priority.  You have food and firewood also in your basics.  I will let you have the 3 water but I will need the 3 Firewood and the 3 Food.  I have a medical condition.'
[A]: Yes


[Q]: Context: 'Hi, how is your trip going? hopefully better than mine' 'My trip is going pretty so so too  im sorry to hear that about yours!! sounds like we both are gonna need some extra stuff? I was wondering if we could start with the water? any chance i could have it all and you can have all of something else? thoughts? im open to discussion' 'I am actually very much in need of water. I fell while I was hiking during this trip. I have a really bad wound I need to clean on my leg. '
Utterance: 'yikes that stinks. i got some extra people with me and we dont hve enough either. could i take 2 since we will be drinking it and maybe you can have 1 to get that wound cleaned up'
[A]: Yes


[Q]: Context: 'hello how are you'
Utterance: 'i'm good thank you, How are you doing today?'
[A]:
No