Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.

Q: "They ignore the plain evidence of dozens of campuses in several states with combined decades of experience of legal carry on campus not producing -any- of the “fears and concerns” they state."

So why are negligent discharges up on campuses who've allowed concealed carry? Were you the "responsible gun owner" who left his shooting iron in the crapper last year at UAF? Or maybe 1/3 who've left unsecured firearms around in the past 3 months, also at UAF?

A: No
****
Q: Very Good APD ~ !

A: Yes
****
Q: Too bad Jolly is getting so little support.   Even worse,  I would guess  a majority of the  voting public is unaware of the time their representatives  spend fund raising.   

Very few people would argue that large private institutions have influence on legislation.   At best, money donations provide very unequal access to those who guide legislation through congress.  At worst, it's a legal bribe.

We've put our legislators and  in a position of begging, not leading,    Sadly, it is the professional leadership of The Party that makes sure it's members play nice and cooperate - or they don't get their share of the booty.    

My hat is off for the brave few, like Jolly and Nolan, who are trying to shed the light on a corrupt process.

A:
No
****