instruction:
In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.
question:
Comment: It's official. Canadians have been driven to mental illness.
answer:
Identity-attack


question:
Comment: "It doesn't keep elections 'pure' it just drives the money into STUPID AREAS"

Well, that's a useful bunch of gibberish. It's not like there aren't elections all around the world with campaign finance laws that work quite well.

"You want to get good candidates get rid of every restriction BUT the REPORTING requirements."

Here's a better idea: leave every candidate with limited but equal financing -- so that candidates focus solely on explaining why their policy is superior to all others -- and every citizen, whether billionaire or hobo has but one equal voice.

It's "one man one vote" not "one dollar one vote."
answer:
Non-identity-attack


question:
Comment: She has exhibited faulty judgement since her election. She should resign and apply for a job at the State Department where there are openings under the new administration. She is doing injustice to her voters in the second district. She is not a team-player, and does not understand her role as a congressional representative. She puts our state in a bad light with the rest of the nation and with the new administration. Gabbard, please remove yourself from office before you do more damage.
answer:

Non-identity-attack