In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Ex Input:
Comment: Liberal ethical hypocrisy yet again... Being corrupt last time and on the edge of political oblivion obviously didn't teach them the lesson. Look at Wynne and now Morneau. Bitch and moan about unethical policies that Harper and his ilk the Conservatives practiced and now do EXACTLY the same thing. Liberals are worse than Conservatives because they lie about being ethical during the election to get the progressive vote and then ditch it once they are in power. Typical Liberal playbook. Trudeau is full of shit.

Ex Output:
Obscene


Ex Input:
Comment: Democrats still can't face the fact that they have been voted out of the White House.  Russian influence?  What a load of crap!

Ex Output:
Obscene


Ex Input:
Comment: Wow. that's quite a leap in logic there Demento. It's getting clearer and clearer that your issue is about multiculturalism rather than the concept of reasonable accommodation or rational thought. My point about your fictional Japanese was that if they had rational reasons then their concerns were justified, however if their reasons were irrational then they need to be called out for it. The excuses I've seen for people not wanting a muslim cemetery are all irrational, ignorant, and fearful with no basis in reality.

It's unfortunate that you can't see the difference between those concepts and are instead caught up in some self induced echo chamber of being offended about people being called out for their prejudices.

Ex Output:

Non-obscene