We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Example Input: The death penalty is much more expensive than life without parole because...blah.blah.blah...*
Example Output: Valid

Example Input: I'm not necessarily disagreeing with you, I do agree with the death penalty, but why should a child's life be worth more than any adult?
Example Output: Valid

Example Input: Someone who has severed someone else's ear isn't "obviously innocent".
Example Output:
Invalid