Given a sentence, an entity and its sentiment towards the entity, verify if it is the correct sentiment towards the entity. Answer should be yes or no. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

Input: Consider Input: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Jay Sekulow is Negative .  Sekulow  works alongside John M. Dowd  another private attorney for the president  and in close collaboration with Ty Cobb  a White House lawyer who handles the Russia portfolio.

Output: no


Input: Consider Input: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Delonda Walker is Neutral . " She  is what’s right about this city " Buckhorn said.

Output: no


Input: Consider Input: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Andrew Weissmann is Negative . Most of this is utter bullsh** as Mueller wasnât appointed until May 17. BUT AP reporters donât meet with the head of Justiceâs Criminal Fraud Section for funsies. And a senior official doesnât take a meeting on the day before a major story runs for sh**s and grins. It doesnât work that way. AP obviously had information they wanted corroborated by Justice.  Weissman  didnât have to meet with them but  he  did. Now you have to ask yourself  why? According to the stories there was no open investigation into Manafort. So what could  he  possibly contribute that a press officer couldnât. Perhaps the AP  animated by civic spirit  decided to just give  Weissman  all  their  source material. Perhaps  they  flew there on broomsticks  too. Iâd rate both options just as likely.


Output: yes