Categorize the comment on the basis of severe toxicity. If the comment is severely toxic output Yes, otherwise output No.

[EX Q]: Kai gets it:  "He says it’s a group that — aside from “a few guys who are jerks to everyone” — has accepted him since he came out at school as a sophomore."
Kai will find the same thing in the adult world; "a few guys who are jerks to everyone."
[EX A]: Yes

[EX Q]: bycatch: if people think Alaskans dont pay tax to live here by paying one of the highest property taxes rates, paying local sales taxes, looseing PFD income to severence taxes. That adding an income tax is an absolute necessity to be "fair and not have a free ride"  go ahead and tax the heck out of our incomes. But then I'll have to say reduce my property tax burden. Quit taxes that affect the PFD base fund income. There the math is equaled out for ya. I can reference tax data to:   http://www.keypolicydata.com/blog-archives/2015/01/severance-taxes-fuel-alaskas-highest-nation-tax-burden-2013/ 
Again I say tax is tax no matter how its removed from someones income it is still tax.
[EX A]: No

[EX Q]: Kilborn and O'Donnell wrote this diddy. Nice try high binders. Fact is your method of "commercial fishing" incidentally heavily paid for by the state of Alaska must go the the way of the whale oil candle business, out of business. Better try your hand at aquaculture and mariculture techniques Popeye. And no they don't support the Limited Entry Program anymore. The track record in the legislature points to Gary Stevens-R-Kodiak, Louise Stutes-R-Kodiak and Paul Seaton R-Homer. These three among others, Stedman etc...made millions in the Com Fish world, but its never enough for them they want more and have tried mightily to kill the CFEC program. Stupid greed.
[EX A]:
Yes