In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

[Q]: Comment: RadirD, Kim Jung Un and the DPRK regime threaten us all the time.  Why would Trump or any other rational person use that as a line in the sand?  It took them a few hours after his asinine statement to threaten us yet again.  Foolish.

The only person who yells out "I'm going to punch you in the face!" is a coward who doesn't actually want a fistfight (like Kim Jong Un).  A serious person would just slam you in the kisser without warning.

Don't get me wrong, the DPRK is a growing and serious threat and there may not be a way out of a conflict at this point.  They have been seriously mishandled and underestimated by every president (both GOP and Dems) since the Korean war.
[A]: Non-sexual-explicit


[Q]: Comment: Little bit of a double standard here. If you are a guy that makes comments and has great knowledge about Women's fashion you will either be called gay or  they will say you are "in touch with your feminine side" and I guarantee nobody will be expected to apologize to you.
The Little Guy
[A]: Non-sexual-explicit


[Q]: Comment: How the hell do you conclude that despising Trump means I voted for Trudeau?
As for this health bill proving that Trump is a genius, you have a few screws loose...
[A]:
Non-sexual-explicit