In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.
--------
Question: Comment: If teachers make a mistake, you screw up a kid.  If doctors make a mistake, someone dies.  That's pretty stressful.  
Bankers make a mistake, people lose some money.  Nobody dies.  Nobody doesn't learn to read.

Answer: Non-identity-attack


Question: Comment: He was already a registered sex offender. This just put the seal on his need to be on the registry for life.

That being said I don't agree with the sex offender registry. It's a form of double punishment for criminals who have served their time. If they can't trust them to not offend again then don't let them out at all.

Answer: Non-identity-attack


Question: Comment: [I feel sorry for the left that can't understand why they lost power. They blame the Russian, the Nazis, the KKK]
Let's make this plain.  You are abandoning any argument on the subject of these kids and resorting to pointless partisan attacks?  Nothing in the article or that we've discussed had anything to do with "the left," "Russians, "Nazis," or the KKK.
[If someone from Somalia moves in next to me, refuses to learn English, wants my taxes to pay for them, has a bunch of goats and half naked kids running around, and has their women wearing a burka we are not going to be friends.]
So why do you advocate removing dreamers when they've, "paid taxes, speak English, and generally live a life like the rest of the people around you?"  Dreamers grew up here, 91% of them work, some have even joined the military yet it seems you ignore the realities of their situation even when you claim you wouldn't have a problem.  Are you intentionally ignoring them or lying to me?

Answer:
Identity-attack