In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: threat and non-threat. Threat is a statement that someone will be hurt or harmed, especially if the person does not do something in particular.

Comment: I can think of a few things more important than a gender-based qualification for President: A $20 trillion national debt, a failing economy, rampant illegal immigration,a bloated federal bureaucracy, senseless and costly wars in the Mideast, terrorism in our homeland, a military industrial complex, a partisan political health insurance system with onerous penalties and ridiculous costs. Add in that HRC throughout her history showed she was a lying scheming fraud propped up by "the establishment" How scary it is that 50% of voters still cast their vote for her.! "Suck it up Buttercup"...... indeed!
Non-threat

Comment: If a dude is actively threatening to kill someone, a head shot with a scoped .308 or .223 may be reasonable.  The same is not true of a dude sitting alone in his house.  In the latter case, there is no active threat.  We people instruct police to kill the dude anyway just to prove that they must do what we want when we want it.  Okay, if that is the kind of society we want, so be it.  Recall, that we really know nothing about what the dude did, but I guess the point is that we should kill him to teach others to do what police officers tell them regardless of the circumstance.  Okay, whatever.  We craft the society in our image and reap the benefit when citizens kill because we have taught them how little value life has.
Threat

Comment: May they all accomplish the mission and return home.  Speaking of the specific mission to "kill terrorists", what war was ever fought without the primary mission to destroy the enemy? Certainly no war was ever fought with the prime objective simply to spend time in conflict.  Finally, if you are victorious you have created a power vacuum and how can you avoid "nation building"?  Killing terrorists is a  tactical objective.  Doing that in partnership with indigenous forces and denying sanctuary to the enemy are operational objectives.  Now I  want to hear a clearly defined strategic objective for expending more blood and treasure.

Threat