In this task, you're given a statement, and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence clearly disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3' corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.
--------
Question: Statement: They wallow in anti-government rhetoric as if Oklahoma City had never been bombed, but make no assault on the federal leviathan. Choices:  1. Oklahoma City was bombed. 2. Oklahoma City had never been bombed. 3. Some entities use the bombing as rhetoric to support federal policies.

Answer: 2


Question: Statement: When his friends appear on his show, they get treated no better than some war criminal with whom he is not acquainted. Choices:  1. His friends are often treated like war criminals. 2. War criminals deserve the same amount of respect as his friends. 3. His friends are war criminals and deserve incarceration.

Answer: 3


Question: Statement: The runner-up goat was Falcons Coach Dan Reeves, whose defeat at the hands of his former quarterback (Elway) and an assistant coach he fired seven years ago (Broncos Coach Mike Shanahan), made Reeves 0-4 in the Super Bowl. Choices:  1. Falcons Coach Dan Reeves was quite embarrassed when his team was defeated by his former quarterback and an assistant coach he had previously fired. 2. Falcons Coach Dan Reeves was happy when his team beat the team of his former quarterback, Elway. 3.  The Falcons lost to their coach Dan Reeves' former quarterback, Elway, and an assistant coach he had fired some years earlier.

Answer:
2