Given a document, generate a short title of the document. The title should convey the main idea/event/topic about which the document is being written. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].
--------
Question: What’s the winning combination? The Super Bowl is an ideal event to highlight TVs  especially those with larger screens. Also  current TV models have been out for nearly a year by February  so there’s been a natural decrease in price  says Jim Willcox  senior electronics editor at Consumer Reports.
Scour social media. Retailers often reward their social media followers with notifications about sales. These act as another “tool in your arsenal” in your pursuit of a good deal   Willcox  says.
Look for a price match guarantee. Check a retailer’s price matching policy. Some stores will refund you the difference if an item drops in price within a certain window after purchase. The one caveat?  Willcox  says items purchased during sale periods like Black Friday are often excluded from price matching.
Check a retailer’s price matching policy. Some stores will refund you the difference if an item drops in price within a certain window after purchase. The one caveat?  Willcox  says items purchased during sale periods like Black Friday are often excluded from price matching. Do your homework. Electronics retailer Best Buy also said the lead-up to the Super Bowl and the holiday season are two of the best times to buy a TV. But if you’re shopping in a pinch  the store also offers a Weekly Ad and Deal of the Day section. If you can’t time your TV purchase  you might still be able to find a deal. Other retailers may have similar options — check their websites or follow their social media to get their deals.

Answer: Deal timing: When is the best time to buy a TV?


Question: The idea: Since Attorney General Jeff Sessions recused himself from the Russia probe in March  he is not supervising special counsel Robert Mueller or his team. That means the buck stops with  the deputy attorney general  Rod Rosenstein .  Rosenstein  told the House Judiciary Committee Dec. 13  he  has seen no reason that would be "good cause" to remove the special counsel and that  he  has confidence in the investigation.
One way for the White House to shake up the probe is to find a way to replace the attorney general  who is recused  with someone who is not. That person could then exercise more control over the Russia investigation  including nixing some spending by the special counsel  refusing to sign off on interviews of key witnesses or requests for grand jury indictments â or even firing  Mueller .
The problem: Sessions is having the time of  his  life at the Justice Department  and doesn't want to go anywhere. Earlier this year   he  rebuffed efforts to mount a write-in campaign for  his  old Senate seat in Alabama  and another effort to get  him  to move over to the Department of Homeland Security.
The problem:  the current Deputy Attorney General  Rod Rosenstein   appeared to draw  his  own line in the sand in recent House testimony  telling lawmakers that special counsel Robert Mueller was among the best civil servants and law enforcement officials in modern history. The new FBI Director  Christopher Wray  is also a fan of Mueller's. And in a standoff during the George W. Bush presidency over surveillance measures the Justice Department balked at approving  Wray also volunteered to resign in protest along with a series of other senior DOJ officials. In other words  the specter of another mass resignation at the top of the Justice Department and the FBI would loom large.

Answer: 3 Ways Trump Or His Allies Might Try To Disrupt The Mueller Russia Probe : NPR


Question: FRANKFURT/LONDON (Reuters) -  Gucci-owner Kering (PRTP.PA)  plans to spin off German sports brand Puma (PUMG.DE) to the French conglomerate’s shareholders as  it  sharpens the group’s focus squarely on its luxury brands.
 Kering  said  it  planned to distribute 70 percent of Puma shares in kind to  its  investors  leaving  it  with only a 16 percent stake in the sportwear group  confirming an exclusive Reuters report.
 Kering  is a little more than 40 percent controlled by the French Pinault family  who would receive about 29 percent of the sporting goods company  while Puma’s free float would stand at about 55 percent.
Shedding Puma  meanwhile  would turn  Kering  into a pure player in the high-margin luxury business  where  it  rivals larger peers such as French conglomerate LVMH (LVMH.PA).
 “Kering  would dedicate  itself  entirely to the development of  its  luxury houses ”  Kering  Chairman and CEO Francois-Henri Pinault said in a statement.
Puma struggled for years after it was bought by Kering for 5.3 billion euros ($6.4 billion) in 2007  but recent improved performance has raised expectations that the French group would sell its stake this year.
Puma’s shares rose by 45 percent over the past year  bringing its market capitalisation to 5.3 billion euros  back at the level at which  Kering  bought.
 Kering  emerged as one of the big winners in a luxury goods revival last year as Chinese demand picked up  with a stellar turn at brand-of-the-moment Gucci helping earnings and other labels such as Yves Saint Laurent and Balenciaga.

Answer:
Kering to spin off Puma to its own shareholders