In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: insult and non-insult. Insult is any lanugage or act that is disrespectful or scornfully abusive.

Comment: Good point, any theocratic philosophy is a threat to constitutional democracy. Canada had a  blasphemy law. 

Violent theocrats are much worse - regardless of their religion. 

I only meant to say that The Premier was probably referring to violent Muslim theocrats which is essentially what an Islamist is. But the term is too close to Islamic and ends up stereotyping the religion. 

Given that the Ottoman empire ended just 100 years ago,  the link to religious rule is more recent in Islam. About the same time the Federal Reserve was created in America and they are still fighting about that!
Non-insult

Comment: Beijing millionaires and wanna be Beijing millionairesses who squeeze money from the rest of us! And stupid blind white men with blinders!
Insult

Comment: I find your use of the term "American white" strange. We're not talking Albania here. Yes, this is Portland,OR. And it isn't just one "one man", it's been going of for years and there are six in the lawsuit. I'm really not looking to get into a drawn out discussion on this. If you believe racism( against blacks ) isn't a problem in today's America than there's probably nothing that anyone can say that will change your opinion. The predominant history in this country is white racism towards blacks,browns, etc.  Are things better because you don't have lynchings,etc.? Sure. The thing that's hard for me to understand is how easy it is for so many to discount other peoples feelings and experiences, as if they're just figments of their imagination with no basis in reality. I say this as someone of caucasian descent with no particularly close black friends, but who trying to imagine  myself in someone else's shoes. You can have the last word if you like.

Non-insult