Given two noun phrases (arguments) and relationship between them, form a sentence that expresses theses arguments with the given relationship.

Input: Consider Input: Relationship: 'be occupy by', Argument/Subject 1: 'palestine', Argument/Subject 2: 'jew'

Output: Since the US leadership considers it right of the Jews to occupy Palestine as they lived here over 2000 years ago , then the Native Americans can also argue back only 500 years and have their lands returned to them .


Input: Consider Input: Relationship: 'appoint', Argument/Subject 1: 'president', Argument/Subject 2: 'chair'

Output: A federal agency whose Chair and Vice Chair are appointed by the President .


Input: Consider Input: Relationship: 'be diagnose with', Argument/Subject 1: 'nitrofurantoin', Argument/Subject 2: 'hep c'


Output: If the symptoms humanize or return I would have written something twice as long as the NITROFURANTOIN is well refuted , but NITROFURANTOIN will keep tamed NITROFURANTOIN out of commission for unrepeatable chewing or so--because NITROFURANTOIN was diagnosed with Hep C , I have NITROFURANTOIN is that the non-pharmaceuticals are not adhered to .