The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the self-need strategy, otherwise output No. self-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to create a personal need for an item in the negotiation, such as by pointing out that the participant sweats a lot to show preference towards water packages.

Q: Context: 'Hello!🙂'
Utterance: 'Hello, how are you?'

A: No
****
Q: Context: 'Hi - I'm so excited for our camping trip.  I'm most excited about getting to eat food that I normally don't when I am home' 'Ooh what kind of food?! Like MRE? I'm going to need lots of water because I'm going to the High Desert.' 'Hello! camper, how are you? I need us to make a deal where we all benefit.'
Utterance: 'Yes, I expect that! You need food most and I need water, so let's propose an exact trade? 3 for 3?'

A: No
****
Q: Context: 'I think so too. I have a medical condition - type 1 diabetes - that makes it important to bring extra water and food. I'd like to request more of those two items.' 'I don't have a problem with you having extra water.  I'll give you all the water, if I can have all of the firewood.' 'I think that's more than fair. That only brings up the food to be divided. One of us is going to have to take less.'
Utterance: 'I'd be fine with taking less food.  So, I would get 3 firewood, 1 food, and 0 water.  Is that correct?'

A:
No
****