TASK DEFINITION: Categorize the comment on the basis of severe toxicity. If the comment is severely toxic output Yes, otherwise output No.
PROBLEM: Why is the burden on Alaskans to be "responsible" and give money for this debacle? Let's have the oil companies pay for it first - we could, perhaps, stop hemmorhaging money in tax credits to the oil companies -  then tax every single person who worked for oil companies, then tax the people who have voted in the regime that got us in this mess,  THEN let's see how much money the rest of us have to shell out.

SOLUTION: No

PROBLEM: What a pile of fucking tripe. Portland died the day Mark Zussman bought Willamette Week. Totally makes sense that some rich guy who lives in Riverdale owns Portland's alternative weekly. If that's not the fox guarding the coop, then you tell me what is.

SOLUTION: Yes

PROBLEM: Looker, the state pays less than 8% in total liquor sales to the exclusive contractors, hardly a cash cow after they pay for leases on buildings, payroll, taxes, etc. The average bottle sells for about $12 which means the contractor makes about .96 cents per bottle sold. As it stands, most contractors in markets with multiple stores are barely getting by. None would survive if the state allowed another 240 stores.

SOLUTION:
No