In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

Ex Input:
Comment: And those muslims that engage in violence because they are offended by said cartoons should be delt with as any other violent criminal within the law.

Ex Output:
Identity-attack


Ex Input:
Comment: Another black racist raised on hate history.  Does she know that the first slave owner in america was a black plantation owner?  Also, a large percentage of slave owners were black.  Of you read “real” history you might know that.  Most slaves after being captured by black Africans and sold to white slave traders were sent to South America, Central America, and the islands in the Caribbean.  Approximately 2% were sent to North America.  Those are “facts”, not left wing progressive propaganda.

Ex Output:
Identity-attack


Ex Input:
Comment: "It's about respect for the "office" ..."

On the one hand, these pages (and the internet at large) seem to love blatant insults directed at the "Leader of the Free World" (yuck) with personal faves being "Cheeto" and "SCROTUS".  So if you can't beat them, join them.  And to be honest "Jughead" is much kinder to the halfwit we have in office than he deserves. (at least Jughead was honorable and trustworthy)

On the other hand, respect is earned.  And Hair Leader hasn't earned any.

Ex Output:

Non-identity-attack