In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine the neutral choice based on your inference from the statement and your commonsense knowledge. The neutral choice is a sentence that neither agrees nor disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3', corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence. If sentence X agrees with sentence Y, one's correctness follows from the other one. If sentence X disagrees with sentence Y, they can not be correct at the same time.

Ex Input:
Statement: Why not just abolish all the laws that are supposed to protect These folk; because if you do not have legal services, the laws are unenforceable and useless. Choices: 1. These folk need legal services to protect them. 2. There is no way to enforce the laws with no legal services. 3. The people can protect themselves against the law.

Ex Output:
1


Ex Input:
Statement: Board of Education , Johnson seems to agree that it was an unprincipled decision that turned out to be a prelude to a major step backward in American race relations. Choices: 1. Johnson says race relations in America are great. 2. Johnson says the American race relations are being damaged.  3. Johnson says American relations between whites and blacks has never been worse.

Ex Output:
3


Ex Input:
Statement: Additionally, more aggressive efforts to use frequent flyer miles to reduce the government's travel costs could, according to GSA, jeopardize its ability to negotiate significant savings under its contract air carrier program. Choices: 1. The efforts to use frequent flyer miles to lower government costs could affect the ability to negotiate savings with airlines. 2. The efforts to use frequent flyer miles to increase government costs could affect the ability to negotiate savings with airlines. 3. The efforts to use frequent flyer miles to lower government costs could affect the ability to negotiate savings with Delta.

Ex Output:

3