In this task, you must classify if a given review is positive/negative, indicating your answer as P or N.

sandra bullock in high heels and wielding a chainsaw ?
yup , it 's got ta be summer .
just when you thought the pointless sequel had gone the way of franchise films and direct - to - video releases , into port slams speed 2 : cruise control , the gloriously godawful follow - up to the 1994 sleeper about a bus rigged to explode if it slowed below a certain speed .
the gimmick , this time , is an ocean liner rigged to , well , crash into stuff .
sound exciting ?
dennis hopper 's disgruntled bomb squader , the villain of the first film , has given way to willem dafoe 's disgruntled computer programmer , a maniac whose main beef has something to do with having to use live leeches , i kid you not , as a self - treatment for copper
poison- ing .
( and said poisoning induced by prolonged exposure to electro- magnetic fields , no less !
calling dean edell . . . )
so , he overrides the boat 's computer , convinces the crew to abandon ship , and sends the remaining passengers , those who could n't evacuate in time , on a col- lision course with destiny .
( oddly , no one thinks to just . . .
jump off the back of the boat . )
with keanu reeves electing not to return--
perhaps he read the script ?
-- the job of john mcclane goes to jason patric ( sleepers ) , as the * second * la cop and swat team member that that bus drivin ' babe annie ( bullock ) has dated .
( what are the odds ? )
they 're on this caribbean cruise for pleasure , as are a handful of requisite stock characters , including a deaf teenager
( ! ) who has a crush on the hero
( ! ! ) who also knows how to sign
( ! ! ! ) .
( and you thought the raptor slam was a cool summer movie move ?
wait till you see the feats that * this * little girl can do , when stuck on a shipboard elevator ! )
bullock is her pesky , perky self , though she ends up with far less screen time than her top billing suggests .
( those paying attention to her bikini-
and tank- tops probably wo n't complain , however ) patric is the main man in motion and that 's damn good , 'cause when he stops to talk , he 's only slightly less monotone than his predecessor .
( his first lol line is to ms .
bullock :
" i 'd like to boogie with you .
" ) of course , nobody in front of the camera embarrasses themselves quite the way that returning director jan de bont does .
he also produced this mess , which is insulting even by the most lax summer standards .
( con air , buddy , father 's day , romy and michelle 's high school reunion , murder at 1600 , 8 heads in a duffle bag , anaconda , vegas vacation , meet wally sparks , metro , bevery hills ninja , the relic , all is forgiven ) .
worse , he 's spent a hundred mil on a premise that does n't even live up to its title !
there 's no sweat - inducing motion of the ocean here-- just two hours of shaky handheld camera work and a handful of cross - cut exteriors , all leading up to the big slam , when the love boat sideswipes an oil tanker and then plows into a harbor town .
( oh , how far we 've come in twenty years .
remember the simple fun of seeing a locomotive smash into railway station in the silver streak ? )
admittedly , either of the aforementioned sequences is worth the price of admission .
it 's just the rest of the movie-- the other hundred or so minutes-- that 's pure nonsense .
and wonderful nonsense at that .
i know he did n't intend to , but de bont has done one thing right : he 's created the hands - down funniest film of the year .
so , now , allow to present a few more things that made me laugh :
o a box with a big label :
" fiber optic converter " o plain english , whole - sentence computer instructions o an entire sequence devoted to opening a fire door o jason patric 's character walks onto the bridge and immediately understands everything that 's happening o a ships ' navigator who speaks in a scottish accent and actually gets to say " i canna override it !
"
o willem dafoe 's amazing arm - mounted keyboard o two living , breathing adults ( bullock 's character and the first mate ) who have to be told , step by step , how to disconnect a trip wire from the pin of a hand grenade .
duh
o " no wait !
"
screams
the ship 's intercom o
yet another damn dog in peril
o fishing reel .
pontoon plane .
memories of weekend at bernie 's
N

' bicentennial man ' is a family film without any external motive with the exception of providing the minimum dose of entertainment .
chris columbus , the director who gave you " mrs . doubtfire " , plays on sentimental strings and mushy dialogue to make his point .
based on the short story by isaac asimov , it is supposed to be a science fiction story about a robot who wants to be human , which as you can imagine is very difficult .
starting in a not too distant future the film concentrates on a wealthy family that buys an android to help them with the house and children .
soon this robot , called andrew ( robin williams ) shows abilities that makes his owner mr .
martin ( sam neill ) very curious .
andrew is interested in art and music , he " enjoys " making clocks , which clearly shows that he has genuine emotions .
it shows out that because of a small failure in the " electrical circuits " and " positronic brain " andrew has accidentally gained a soul .
this makes him unique and his evil creators worried .
then mr .
martin decides to teach andrew all the things he was n't programmed to do .
soon andrew wants to leave the house in pursuit of freedom , destiny and love .
this film can be described as a disney version of blade runner , a film that still shines as the biggest gem in the crown of science fiction .
ever since that film , the subject of humanity still stands as one big controversy .
what makes us human ?
the thoughts ?
the emotions ? is it possible to become human ?
at what point can we say to a robot " now you are one of us " ?
these are very tough questions that require a serious and thurral approach .
it is obvious that columbus did n't take them very seriously .
when you think about it , this film is not really meditating on the question
" when is a robot no longer a machine , but a human being ? " , but tells a story about racial discrimination and lack of understanding .
andrew is so complex and emotional from the very beginning that the audience immediately accepts him as a human being , and only the society has troubles with it .
in other words , it is as far from reality as from the academy awards .
further more , there are other annoying problems .
to this day no serious filmmaker has dared to speculate about the future in more than 50 years from now .
this has not been done for obvious reasons , because the filmmakers are well aware of the fact that they lack the knowledge and imagination to perform such a difficult task .
columbus is the first to have crossed that line .
the result is , as you might imagine , primitive , unrealistic and incredibly disappointing effort .
the world is simply frozen in time .
neither the society , fashion , culture or values have changed over 200 years .
mom is still working at the kitchen , doing the dishes .
when you think back to the late 17th century and then compare it to the world we live in today , you 'll see a slightly bigger difference .
i am not saying that everything should change .
it is unlikely that the human rights will change , but it 's even more unlikely that there will not be any progress in science , technology and fashion .
i suppose it 's possible to watch this as a some sort of bizarre fairytale , but it 's really hard .
robin williams is hidden behind c and speaking in a robotic way .
as always he does a decent job , as does sam neill .
but it does n't really matter .
it is the sentimentality and length that turns
this picture into a tiresome experience .
pretty much like last year 's " meet joe black " , this is a primitive and unresolved story which is presented with a splendor and professionalism that it does n't deserve .
great actors and a talented crew have worked hard to achieve something that will be instantly forgotten .
when isaac asimov wrote this story , the future seemed far away and magical .
everything seemed possible .
now is the future of asimov 's time , and we know that it is not as magical and perfect as it seemed a long time ago .
for the same reasons that the young generation of today can not be amazed by julius verne 's " 20 000 leagues under the sea " , so ca n't we accept this story as a potential reality .
let us hope that next year 's " a. i. " will be more rewarding .
N

the last line ( or near to that honor ) is the great butler , alfred ( the ubergod , michael gough ) saying , " i think we need a bigger bat cave , " or something to that note .
that 's exactly what this film is - too big for its own good because it has too damn much .
cut batgirl out .
cut one of the villains .
it 's too much to handle in one dosage .
it 's so much that characters get left behind .
poor elle gets a mere 3 scenes and a subplot which is introduced but never finished in any way , shape or form .
and elle deserves better .
this is the fourth in the gigantic film series and the second from director joel schumacher .
it 's also the fourth worst in the series ( and second worst from joel ) .
the series has been declining since its stunning debut , followed by the almost - as - stunning sequel and then the anti - climactic third one ( first by joel ) .
this one 's not
anti - climactic - i knew it was gon na suck
.
it 's up to joel to make it fun though .
" batman forever " was fun .
this is a big bore of over - produced action sequences and shallow characters .
i mean , this one bit .
i 'm gon na put all the plot in one paragraph : mr .
freeze ( ah - nold ) , who 's wife was dying of some disease , has become the new big villain these days .
he 's a huge ex - scientist who fell into some weird liquid ( hello ? joker ? )
and now has a body temperature of a big fat zero and has a blue body .
batman ( george ) and robin ( chris ) fight him a bit but find they 're growing apart .
meanwhile , another villain shows up , poison ivy ( uma ! ) , who was a dorky scientist chick working on flowers in south america with a twistet scientist ( john glover ) who kills her when she finds out he 's used her research to develop an uberman , bane , who is basically a man pumped with chemicals which probably killed any personality he ever had .
she emerges from her chemicals ( do n't ask 'cause i ca n't tell ya ) as a sexy woman ( the real uma ) who 's poison when
or if you kiss her and has some aphrodiasiatic scent she blows at people .
she starts to tear away at the dynamic duo .
meanwhile , alfred 's dying of the same disease mr .
freeze 's wife has ( but in an earlier state than she ) , and his niece , barbara ( alicia ) , comes all the way from oxford without an english accent to get him away from the butler trade , but soon ( well , not really soon , it takes her 2 hours ) becomes batgirl .
meanwhile , in an unfinished subplot , bruce ( batman 's alter - ego , if you forgot ) has been dating the lovely julie madison ( the even lovlier elle macpherson ) who wants a commitment after a year but he says nothing .
end of her for all we know .
mr .
freeze ultimately teams with poison ivy
and they want to freeze the world and then take it over growing new plants as their population
( do n't ask ! ! ! ) .
the trio must team together " as family " to beat them .
there ya go .
not the whole story but no big context clues . too much , right ?
right !
the films seems patched together of nice little ideas which would have made for a couple good sequels .
however , while tim burton nicely balanced the villain / batman storyline ( although not wonderfully ) , joel seems to do almost nothing with batman in this one .
he gets some corny speeches , a couple clever lines and that 's it .
maybe some stunts .
for all this , i ca n't even comment on george clooney as batman - i hardly saw the guy !
and when i did , he had horrible dialogue to say .
i think michael keaton is the quintessential batman
but val kilmer was too robotic and fake as batman in the last episode .
george is in between them .
he 's not quintessential , he 's not horrible , he 's good .
but i 'm sure next time when they decide to renovate the series since they 'll be critically murdered for this sorry effort , we 'll get a good script and clooney will shine ( if he still has the job ) .
the villains are the only interesting part of the series according to schumacher .
last time , we had the brawn of two face as played by tommy lee jones and the brains / comedy supplied by the riddler as realized by jim carrey .
this time we have a somewhat sympathetic and somewhat hatable villain ( the same guy ) , mr . freeze .
we feel bad for his mental / physical collapse but does he really need to kill everyone for plants ?
arnold is n't very good - too hokey but kinda sympathetic at some points .
when he watches old movies of his wife , he actually looks somber .
wow .
but uma makes the most of her seductive character , getting the right point between hamminess and seductiveness .
it 's like she 's almost parodying herself in " pulp fiction " at points .
she 's incredibly hot and makes the movie pretty much a star better .
as for the lower bat - people , chris is the same as he was in " batman forever , " although i think his work in these is too hokey when he 's best at quieter parts in " scent of a woman " or just plain cool parts in " fried green tomotoes .
" alicia - i love the girl but
she 's not particularly good in this film .
she can hypotheitically act , we all saw that in " clueless , " but her lines kinda sound weird .
and it is n't the mushy - mouth this time .
but in all fairness , she has virtually no part .
joel gets around to her occasionally and when she 's on , she does stupid stuff . . .
although i know i 'm not the only one who loved the catfight between her and uma . . .
and poor elle .
poor , poor elle .
i love that woman
and she can also hypothetically act ( for those of us who saw " sirens " ) .
but she has no part ! ! !
it seems like joel had so much footage that he had to edit almost an hour out of the final product .
there are no " couch " scenes ( like my best friend noticed ) .
now listen to me on this one - in every " batman " flick , there 's a couch scene .
in the original , it was with vicki .
in " returns , " it was a good make - out scene with selena .
and in the last one , it was a chat with nicole .
this one , it 's nothing .
and batgirl does next - to - nothing in this film till the end when she 's suddenly " part of the family .
"
fortunately , we get a lot of alfred .
he 's the always reliable butler , in case you did n't know , who has been with bruce all his life .
he 's a god .
he 's a father figure .
he 's also dying .
this got to me .
i love alfred almost as much as bruce and to see him in a robe , not in his tux , and freaking dying just gets to me .
we also get the idea that he might have been unhappy the whole time . . .
but this is never answered , as this film is too cluttered .
but in defense , it does have some good parts , other than uma .
for one , george is a good batman but unfortunately gets nothing to do .
and there are some nice touches .
when they show the asylum at one point , they show the patient 's belongings in a room and we see the riddler 's costume .
i laughed .
and during a biker scene ( involving robin and batgirl - another subplot never handled past initiation period ) , we not only see coolio but a bunch of bad - asses dressed as " droogs " from " a clockwork orange .
"
i laughed at all these .
the film falls apart around the five - minute mark during an enormously long action sequence which must last around 20 minutes . . .
or did it just feel like that ?
the film should serve as another in the long - line of films which demonstrate that we need more intelligent films nowadays .
people are fed up with stupid films .
that 's why the word of mouth killed " the lost world !
"
that 's why last year , indy films grossed more than ever .
that 's why this will have a strong box - office initative from people who just want to see it , like me , but will die after a week or two when the word around the grapevine kills it
.
that 's why the next two big - budget aciton pics are john woo 's " face / off " and barry sonnenfeld 's " men in black , " both which are the first two to catch on to the wave early on .
i like
joel schumacher more as a person than an artiste .
i like some of his films ( " flatliners , " " a time to kill " ) but a lot of them suck .
he 's a really eccentric person and i loved one of his quotes about how he admits to being a mediocre director
and that 's what makes him great .
but his costuming for woody allen 's " sleeper " was more interesting than this one ( and his costuming was cool - look for the nazi number ) .
i love the " batman " series .
the first two rocked
and i did like the last one .
but this one is not going to be one that i watch repeatedly like the other three .
hopefully , this will also serve as a springboard to a better batman next time .
and maybe they 'll get smart and bring back catwoman .
and michael keaton .
but we can only hope .

N