We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

[Q]: Sent1: so you weigh whatever monetary savings (if any) over the life of someone found innocent after conviction (even if rare)?
 Sent2: After all, the person you're torturing may actually be innocent.
[A]: Not similar


[Q]: Sent1: But killing someone because of him killing someone is quite hypocritical.
 Sent2: First it is more expensive to kill a person, then letting him stay for a life long imprisonment.
[A]: Not similar


[Q]: Sent1: I used to be for the death penalty, however two things made me question my position.
 Sent2: I have a entirely different view as to what the goal of capital punishment should be.
[A]:
Not similar