In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.

Ex Input:
Comment: Picard is fighting a desperate rearguard action against the assumptive privatization of public space. In recent decades, planners eliminated public phones and clocks on the assumption that everyone carries a cell phone, omitted drinking fountains on the assumption that visitors bring their water in plastic bottles, and ignored shaded seating on the assumption that people are always only a few steps away from their air-conditioned vehicle. The logical final step is to forget public washrooms, leaving it to some entrepreneur to invent a portable plastic potty with a suitable modesty cape to wrap around the waist. 
A pedestrian trip into our public spaces is like a trek into the wilderness. Anything you need you must bring with you or chance purchasing from traders you may encounter there. The public is not at home in its public spaces.
I'm with Picard. Let's build public washrooms as part of a re-civilization of our cities. Build for people, not cars.

Ex Output:
Agree


Ex Input:
Comment: The number of  pipsqueak  reporters and newsreaders  criticizing the man who will be President Donald Trump on January 20 is  noteworthy only for the shallow, herd mentality  it exposes. This  piece of cheap satire  will fit in neatly with the earlier hysterical pieces written prior to the new President's election by the American people.

Ex Output:
Disagree


Ex Input:
Comment: Agreed. I'll never understand the notion that somehow all ideas are equal, and should be given equal treatment.

Ex Output:

Agree