Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.

Q: We had a chance last election to replace Young with Forrest Dunbar.  Dunbar is dripping with ethics and integrity.  I guess Alaska isn't ready for that type of leadership.

A: No
****
Q: OV,

Let's say your view is 100% spot-on.  Oregon democrats found away to tax businesses with annual sales in Oregon above $25 million with a 2.5% rate with no, nada, nyet, 0 effect on Oregonians.  Hurray!  Yowza!  Raise that 2.5% another .05%!  How long do you think it will be before other states take notice and go for that "free" money also?  Do you think that will affect corporate national pricing strategy?  If so, it will only be a matter of time before Oregonians are "trickled" on.

A: No
****
Q: I don't see any reference to "little lady".  Is that just a projection on your part?  The accusation of sexism seems really strained here.  I didn't catch any the first time and reading it again looking for it didn't catch any.

Is "Saucrestress" the extent of this charge? It's worth noting that traditionally "mistress" is the female equivalent of "master".  The feminist magazine Ms. uses an abbreviation for "mistress".

I get being a bit defensive.  I think the review could have gone into more detail about the differing styles of the pies and whether they were good for the styles. Certainly the review shows a modest preference for Pizza Jerk over Red Sauce. But the charge of sexism seems flimsy at best.

A:
No
****