In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

[Q]: Comment: And are you so naive to think that taking away someone's license prevents them from driving??? hilarious.
[A]: Non-sexual-explicit


[Q]: Comment: That is 100 % an impossibility. If you are pro life and vote and support candidates and a party that advocates full term and late term abortion at will then you cannot under any circumstance be pro life.

You have to look at where the candidates stand. Hillary wants us to be required to provide and pay for abortions and abortive medicines. She stated flat out in the debate she supports full term partial birth murder. HOW can ANY Catholic support her. Then there are the e - mails where she, through her campaign, states how "backwards" we are and advocates groups to sping to action when they can incite a "Catholic Spring." SHE will use law and the courts to mandate the marrying of homosexuals and the providing of abortion procedures. No Catholic can vote for her.
[A]: Non-sexual-explicit


[Q]: Comment: You'll probably get some responses that Trump truly is a "madman" of course.

I guess my question then is (probably not answerable except by time) is Trump up for the bluster he's showing?  He does have somewhat of a track record of making overblown threats (just as an example, "on day one I will appoint a special prosecutor to investigate Hillary Clinton).  Why is this different? I don't know if I would call it bluffing per se, since I think he wholeheartedly believes what he says when he says its.  Reality sometimes brings a different light on things when it comes to a head.

I do think it would be very dangerous for our position in the world to "turn NK to glass" as some others have called it, just because Kim won't turn over his nuclear weapons.  The rest of the world seems OK (uncomfortable sure, but OK) with him having them.  So someone is going to have to take a bloody nose or else we are going to seem the bad guy if we attack first.  Your thoughts?
[A]:
Non-sexual-explicit