Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.

Example Input: If she is bisexual but married only to a man, the state is discriminating against her for not also letting her marry a woman. It's all about love and who are we to deprive bisexuals of a marriage to a member of each sex?
Example Output: Yes

Example Input: So what you are really saying is you have no evidence or argument.
I already stated i am not keen on him, but here i am giving you the opportunity to sway me, and you can provide no details to back up your statement before of "but when I look at their positions on the issues, Hillary comes out on top."  WHAT are those issues ? So far the only thing you have repeated is your statement of him being a racists. This does not bolster her skills or ability.  If you are supporting her, your job is to recruit votes for her, and to do that you need to present your case, not to lay blame on something else. you saying he suck does not make her better. i already know he sucks. State a reason she is better than him for the job ?  Because i can state multiple reasons, in spite of the fact that i disagree with him, that he is still better for the job than her.
Example Output: Yes

Example Input: Key word, party, implying drugs and alcohol.  Stupid behavior is stupid behavior.  How come no one called the cops?  Or, removed the weapon from his hands?  It appears no one acted responsibly.
Hardly a case for disarming the public, now is it?
Do you drive after a couple of drinks?
Far more are killed by cars than just about anything else in this country.
Example Output:
No