Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.

Those stupid liberals are just awful!!! I mean, how can they think that its fair to infringe on our rights to shoot the gay and latino and black people, and keep the women in the kitchen!

I mean, isn't it just an outrage to assume that these people have civil rights???
Yes

Roberta B. Rinehart - in this country we don't make decisions based on personal preference, but on the Constitution and the basis of natural rights. I'm sorry you're afraid of guns, but your fear should not deprive other people of their natural right to protect themselves in the event of an attack much like what you describe. Rich people who can afford armed guards should not be the only ones who have a hope of being safe in this country.

And, no, getting rid of all the guns would not stop violence from occurring ... it would only make an uneven scenario where the bigger and stronger can overpower the smaller and weaker. Guns are an equalizer and as a woman who avoided being raped because of a gun, I refuse to allow you to make me a victim.
Yes

Hmm...I too worked in DOC prior to Department level status when it was still an entity of H&SS under Helen Bierne thru to it's morphing into a Department. It has grown a lot. More staff, more inmates, more institutions. As with any entity that gets large, especially government, "Murphy's Law" at all levels kicks in all the much harder. Kevin Brew and Gerald Tamura commented. These people have "seen this elephant" during long careers and no doubt could speak at length.Time will tell how Dean Williams as Commissioner will work out. But one word of caution to him: Don't be the type of Commissioner that places the staff in the position of becoming more concerned of the "figurative knife" in the back from administration rather than being able to concentrate on their job. It has happened all too often.

Yes