In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

Q: Comment: Oh, those 'naughty' BC Liberals! First, Christy shrugs and says, "The BC voters don't care corrupt we are.", then disappears until the whole thing blows over (she hopes). Then her deputy crime boss, Rich Coleman comes out and throws their donors under the bus. If that wasn't bad enough, Suzanne Anton, Attorney General, stands up in QP and throws their lobbyists under the bus.  Who's next?

A: Non-identity-attack
****
Q: Comment: Time for all non-trumpeteers to take a stand, by remaining seated at every event where the anthem is played, until this miserable excuse of a president is out of office.

A: Non-identity-attack
****
Q: Comment: Karen, somehow this threat of yours that I may end up homeless is supposed to be the driving force behind me getting in line with every plan you can devise to separate me from my money so you can house the homeless. To that I say BULL!

I am 59, have worked since I was a teen and have earned EVERYTHING I have. I pay city, state and federal taxes and well over half of what I pay goes into handouts designed to ease the burden of not earning your way. And to the I say BULL!

You want to house the homeless. Make a big one ot two room shelter, (think quonset hut) supply a bed and warm place to sleep. Supply a meal or two that is adequate to survive. Supply a shower and laundry facilities. Supply a security guard or two. From there, they can stay rent free, look for work clean and with clean cloths, and have some incentive to get off your lazy butt.

A:
Non-identity-attack
****