In this task, you are provided with an article about the legal acts. Your task is to generate a headline for that article.

Input: Consider Input: After preliminary examination the Commission is of the opinion that the second subparagraph of Clause 11 (1) of each of the patent licensing agreements concluded by Heidemaatschappij Beheer NV with Grondboorbedrijf J. Mos BV, Reinders-Wessemius Grondboorbedrijven BV, De Ruiter Boringen en Bemalingen BV and Landdevelopment and Reclamation Company (Lareco) BV, whereby Heidemaatschappij as patentholder undertakes not to issue identical or similar licences to other firms in the Netherlands without the consent of the parties to each agreement and the other licensees, and the decisions taken jointly by Heidemaatschappij and its licensees in pursuance of the second subparagraph of Clause 11 (1), satisfy the tests of Article 85 (1) of the EEC Treaty and that there are no grounds for granting exemption under Article 85 (3). This Decision is addressed to the following undertakings:    1. NV Heidemaatschappij Beheer, Lovinklaan 1, Arnhem;2. Landdevelopment and Reclamation Company (Lareco) BV, Zijpendaalseweg 87, Arnhem;3. BV Grondboorbedrijf J. Mos, Kleidijk, Rhoon;4. De Ruiter Boringen en Bemalingen BV, Haarlemmerstraatweg 79, Halfweg-Haarlemmerliede;5. Reinders-Wessemius Grondboorbedrijven BV, Kanaal ANZ 133-1, Emmer-Compascuum.

Output: Commission Decision relating to a proceeding under Article 85 of the Treaty establishing the EEC (IV/28.967 - Bronbemaling/Heidemaatschappij) (Only the Dutch text is authentic)


Input: Consider Input: The granting of financial compensation shall be subject to the condition that each consignment has been subjected, on leaving the dispatch area, to the check as laid down in the second subparagraph of Article 8 (1) of Regulation (EEC) No 1035/72 in accordance with the provisions to that effect. The application for the financial compensation referred to in Article 6 of Regulation (EEC) No 2511/69 shall include:    (a) the name of the seller;(b) the total quantities marketed, expressed in net weight and subdivided, where appropriate by product and, in the case of oranges, by variety;(c) for each consignment, the date, the means of transport used, the quantities of products expressed in net weight and subdivided, where appropriate, by product or, in the case of oranges, by variety.The application shall be accompanied, in the case of each consignment, by a copy of the certificate of inspection provided for in Regulation (EEC) No 2638/69 (9) of 24 December 1969 laying down additional provisions on quality control of fruit and vegetables marketed within the Community ; the certificate shall indicate the net weight of the goods, which, in the case of oranges, shall be indicated for each variety.  (1)OJ No L 118, 20.5.1972, p. 1. (2)See p. 3 of this Official Journal. (3)OJ No L 318, 18.12.1969, p. 1. (4)See p. 1 of this Official Journal. (5)OJ No L 77, 29.3.1969, p. 1. (6)OJ No L 2, 1.1.1973, p. 1. (7)OJ No L 295, 24.11.1969, p. 14. (8)OJ No L 66, 13.3.1973, p. 23. (9)OJ No L 327, 30.12.1969, p. 33. 1. For products dispatched directly to another Member State under cover of a T2 international Community transit document, the evidence referred to in Article 8 (1) of Regulation (EEC) No 2511/69 shall be supplied on request by the office of departure when the latter has received the copy of the T2 document.For products dispatched directly to another Member State under cover of an international consignment note or an international express parcels consignment note equivalent to the T2 document, evidence shall be supplied on request by the office of departure when the international consignment note or international express parcels consignment note indicating that the goods in question have been accepted for carriage by the railway authorities has been presented to the said office. The office of departure may only authorize an amendment of the transport contract so that the carriage operation is completed within the forwarding Member State or outside the Community only if evidence has not been or will not be supplied.2. For products which are not dispatched directly to another Member State in accordance with the foregoing paragraph, the evidence referred to in the said Article 8 (1) may be supplied only by producing the control copy provided for in Article 1 of Regulation (EEC) No 2315/69.Sections 101, 103 and 104 of the control copy must be completed.Section 104 shall be completed by deleting the first indent and adding to the second indent one of the following endorsements:'Products to be imported into (Member State of importation) in accordance with Regulation (EEC) No 2498/75.''Produits destinés à être introduits en/au ... (État membre d importation) conformément au règlement (CEE) nº 2498/75.''Erzeugnisse, die nach Verordnung (EWG) Nr. 2498/75 nach (Einfuhrmitgliedstaat) zu verbringen sind.''Prodotti destinati ad essere introdotti in ... (Stato membro d importazione) conformemente al regolamento (CEE) n. 2498/75.''Produkten bestemd om in ... (Lid-staat van invoer) te worden binnengebracht overeenkomstig Verordening (EEC) nr 2498/75.''Produkter bestemt til indførsel i ... (indførselsmedlemsstaten) i overensstemmelse med forordning (EØF) Nr. 2498/75.'Where goods intended for export to another Member State are dispatched under Community transit procedure or to a Swiss or Austrian office of destination from which they will be dispatched to that other Member State, the control copy, by way of derogation from Article 5 (3) of Regulation (EEC) No 2315/69, shall accompany the goods to the competent customs office of the Member State of destination. Regulation (EEC) No 193/70 is repealed.This Regulation shall enter into force on 1 October 1975.This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Output: Regulation laying down detailed rules for the payment of financial compensation for certain Community citrus fruit


Input: Consider Input: The authorization for the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg granted in Decision 75/578/EEC shall be withdrawn with effect from 31 December 1977 as far as the variety Tiran (Phleum pratense L.) is concerned. This Decision is addressed to the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg.


Output: Commission Decision amending Decision 75/578/EEC authorizing the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg to restrict the marketing of seed of certain varieties of agricultural plant species (Only the French text is authentic)