We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Sent1: if you execute a pickpocket or give him life imprisonment, then you would have one less thief to worry about but I think we agree that that would be excessive).
 Sent2: Also, I wonder if a criminal thinks of the punishment when he commits the crime - if he were counting on being punished, he wouldn't have done it.
Not similar

Sent1: I am responding.....you seem to think thatg life in prison is worse then the death penalty........I am telling you that the prisoners on death row would disagree........
 Sent2: I'm not necessarily disagreeing with you, I do agree with the death penalty, but why should a child's life be worth more than any adult?
Not similar

Sent1: Everything that is needed for an ordinary trial is the same for a Death Penalty case, only more so.
 Sent2: In many cases, the appointed attorneys are overworked, underpaid, or lacking the trial experience required for death penalty cases.

Not similar