We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Q: Sent1: The theory is that reducing the overall number of handguns will somehow reduce gun crime, which is a little like saying that reducing the overall number of cars will reduce drunk driving.
 Sent2: The Center to Prevent Handgun Violence, a division of Handgun Control, Inc., disagreed with Lott's findings, as well as the overall assumption that a reduction in the availability of guns in society reduces violent crime.

A: Similar
****
Q: Sent1: Keeping violent criminals in prison would do far more to reduce gun crime than banning guns.
 Sent2: You can not use this as evidence that the reduction in crime is due to the gun ban.

A: Not similar
****
Q: Sent1: Is your point that citizens should be allowed to have guns to defend themselves from the government or that citizens should be allowed to have guns to protect themselves from other citizens?
 Sent2: Aren't you the one who used to complain that airlines can't choose to allow private citizens to carry guns on planes because of government regulations?

A:
Not similar
****