In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

[Q]: Comment: One thing for sure - it's going to be extremely funny watching the BC NDP suck and blow at the same time on this one.
[A]: Sexual-explicit


[Q]: Comment: Laura Thielen, you can now sit back in your lanai and suck it.  Take your selfish, arrogant attitude and stuff it in a sock.
[A]: Sexual-explicit


[Q]: Comment: "Such rates have only been seen during the Civil War and the Volker era "

Hahaha!  No, not even close.  7% is not outrageous, it is quite normal and within the average historical range.  Unless you think the Civil War happened in 1990 (7%) or 1989 (8%), or perhaps the year before when it was 9.75%?.  

At 10% interest rates that is 2 trillion going to interest alone.  That is more than half of the federal budget.  So in any scenario, whoever raises the interest rates (to WHATEVER you would agree is the "historical average, because it damn sure isn't zero) will crash the economy and you have basically no counter-argument whatsoever.  None.
[A]:
Non-sexual-explicit