We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Example Input: Sent1: It also give the right to equipment with which you could execute murders, armed robberies and other violent crime.
 Sent2: You can debate that without guns there would be more deaths to other weapons although you can't debate it would be to the same extent as gun murders and crimes would be.
Example Output: Not similar

Example Input: Sent1: Gun free zones are areas where law-abiding citizens are forbidden to carry guns.
 Sent2: Gun free zones are zones where criminals will have guns because criminals will not obey the laws about gun free zones.
Example Output: Similar

Example Input: Sent1: Now when you rightfully talk about how the 2nd amendment grants me the right to own a gun people won't take you seriously because you think the 2nd amendment cannot be repealed.
 Sent2: If you repealed the 2nd amendment or any "incorporated" amendment than that amendment would no longer be law thus not "incorporated" (obviously since there is nothing to incorporate).
Example Output:
Not similar