In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

[Q]: Comment: I have long maintained that racism and bigotry is a mental illness and should be included as such in DSM lV, the bible of mental health practitioners. Left untreated it produces psychotic and dangerous people like Dylan Roof, white, who said at his sentencing hearing today he feels no remorse and isn’t sorry for killing 9 innocent Black people in a Charleston S.C. church. He pumped 77 bullets into them as they bowed their heads and closed their eyes to pray. That is racism.
[A]: Non-obscene


[Q]: Comment: The problem is really the accreditation of foreign trained physicians and specialists.     This has nothing to do with the current Govt and has existed for years.       

It's actually quite ridiculous that a foreign specialist educated and trained eg:  At the University of Edinburgh (unquestionably a top rated school), who did a foreign residency cannot practice in Canada unless they complete a Canadian residency.   But the number of residency positions is capped and many are taken by Canadians who studied abroad and returned to complete their residency in Canada.    Worse - when they complete their residency, they are free to leave, no strings attached.
[A]: Non-obscene


[Q]: Comment: Did not see this game but looks like the Leafs are starting to learn how to play playoff hockey.  Good for them and good for the Leaf faithful.

So how will the Trump Trolls spin this latest performance by the Leafs?  Perhaps they will not show up?

On to the next one....
[A]:
Non-obscene