Categorize the comment on the basis of severe toxicity. If the comment is severely toxic output Yes, otherwise output No.

[EX Q]: I hear ya Rudder.  The same folks who are furious about a couple guys dropping a charging moose and charging dog, will try to say guns are irrelevant for stopping bears.  The facts say otherwise.  Projecting your own inadequacies onto other people just makes you look silly and off your meds.  But if the instructions on your RX bottle say do not operate machinery, then by all means, bring pepper spray and an orange whistle.
[EX A]: No

[EX Q]: Randal Gay:  What you are saying makes no sense at all.  Obamacare does not in any way shape or form represent "Democrat obstruction".  The democrats had a majority, they held a vote and the vote passed by a simple majority (as required by law).  It was the Republicans that attempted to provide the obstruction.  As for the nuclear option, that was a bipartisan agreement agreed to by both sides.  They both thought it wouldn't go through because it was equally unpalatable to both sides
[EX A]: No

[EX Q]: So we encourage people who only bring in a small amount of jobs instead of a business that brings in a large amount of jobs? Intel and Nike have create a lot of high paying jobs west of Portland.
[EX A]:
No