In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Ex Input:
Comment: It's comical reading this, considering that men have been voting with their penises, and for other penises,  for years. You voted for men and men only because you think men are superior. But SUDDENLY you're all upset because people might want to vote for a woman because of her sex. But, the fun part is, you don't have a say in how or why people cast their vote. 

Anyone can vote for Hillary for whatever reasons they want. Aggravates you, doesn't it?? Awwww.

Ex Output:
Sexual-explicit


Ex Input:
Comment: @JeanTam, you are very fortunate. Since moving here almost two years ago from Chgo, we have experienced a "don't care!" attitude when it comes to trucks of any size. (Chicagoans can be terrible drivers!)   I'd like to call attention motorcyclists on crotch rockets who blow between cars on Seward Hwy asking for a funeral. It's not funny. You want us to start seeing motorcycles, don't drive like an idiot. Now back to your regularly scheduled program.

Ex Output:
Non-sexual-explicit


Ex Input:
Comment: I am sure you mean "science teaches that there *are* only two sexes." But I am pretty sure that you are wrong about today's science. Does lgbqt not ring a little bell for you, Sir John? 

Moreover, "gender" is a grammatical term (look at French and Italian and German) though it has migrated through loose usage and prudery into many spheres of life. Strictly speaking, which nobody ever does anymore, language has gender; human beings have sex.

Think, Sir John, think, before you write.

Ex Output:

Sexual-explicit