In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

Q: Comment: Upon what evidence do you base your opinion that her response was "phony?"  Or that it was "outrage?"  The outrage that YOU are expressing shows an appalling lack of sensitivity on your part.  Why defend rudeness?

A: Non-identity-attack
****
Q: Comment: Absolutely.  

It's hard to believe how they keep shooting themselves in the foot, but that is what you get from an organization so steeped in fictions and misaligned agendas.

A: Non-identity-attack
****
Q: Comment: "The poorly educated angry white people still flocked to my rallies and I knew they would carry me through." 

Okay, so we know who she is prejudiced against. Trump aside, I wonder if it has occurred to Dowd that these people have some legitimate grievances at the way the US economy has been stacked against them? But I'm sure Down has plenty of money and never has to worry about where next month's rent is coming from or if she'll run out of food stamps before the end of the month.

A:
Identity-attack
****