In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Ex Input:
Comment: Did I miss something in the article about her parents immigration status? Or is this an assumption based on the colour of her skin? 

Perhaps her parents did immigrate to Canada, perhaps it was her grandparents, or maybe she came on her own. Does it matter?

People who made, and also those who went along with this assumption, simply based on what she looks like need to get with the times and STOP making assumptions on people based on the colour of their skin.

Ex Output:
Non-sexual-explicit


Ex Input:
Comment: I'm at fault for voting for his dad.--But I have learned my costly mistake.  My grandson a new voter and his pot head buddies voted for our little potato---and they are now saying---what a mistake.

Ex Output:
Non-sexual-explicit


Ex Input:
Comment: I haven't read Sen. Flake's book and have heard him speak only briefly about this book. He seems earnest and certainly this is a welcome exploration of the Trump phenomenon from a thoughtful source.
Too bad no one has done a similar tome on the Obama presidency and the disasters it wrought. We could never expect this from a centrist Democrat, like Joe Manchin. The left is marching in lockstep and none of them would dare speak their minds.
This is a shame because in large part the Trump presidency is a Republican knee-jerk reaction to the calamity of Obama's eight years of malfeasance.

Ex Output:

Non-sexual-explicit