We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Ex Input:
The requirements for life are vastly lower then the requirments for death.

Ex Output:
Valid


Ex Input:
And no, I do not claim that there are trials that can determine innocence after execution...we hold those while they are alive, and before they are sentenced to death.

Ex Output:
Valid


Ex Input:
it is quite clear that Jesus did not support the death penalty.

Ex Output:

Valid