In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Comment: What else is to be expected when a non-leader with zero grasp is made chief?
This is just part of the fulfillment; preordained.
Onward it will go. Are we halfway yet? Hopefully, this debacle is a marker on the short, last leg to Trump's demise.
Non-obscene

Comment: 100yrs from now... 

"ah yes, ol' standoff szajkowski, i remember him well.  boy, nobody could pull off a standoff like joe; he had a real talent for it.  so talented in fact that he began teaching standoff tactics 101 at the local community college.  tell that guy to do something and he'd stonewall your ass til' the cows came home.  ya know, a lot of people didn't know this about joe, but he was a phenomenal badminton player too.  yep, i didn't believe it either when i first heard.  but it's true.  they used to call 'em ol' shuttlecock szajkowski.  wonder whatever happened to that standoff-havin' shuttlecock whackin' crazy sonofabitch?"
Obscene

Comment: The payment of ransom is always very dangerous, which is why the US says they never pay.  Even with that danger, the payment is not the issue; if you read my comment, I said it "might be reasonable"; even of the lie of making payment.

But, now the government is lying about a lie when it is common knowledge that both lies are in fact lies.  It is like a child with cookie crumbs on his lips, saying he didn't take cookies out of the cookie jar.  It makes them look very foolish.

Interesting that you think property which "Iran was legally entitled to" can be legitimately withheld and used as ransom, and that the money was legitimately Iran's and simultaneously a ransom payment.

Non-obscene