We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Q: Sent1: The thing is, without the death penalty there is absolutely no deterrent from committing heinous crimes.
 Sent2: Death penalty are given to those who have comitted a very serious crime.

A: Not similar
****
Q: Sent1: The argument for the death penalty as a deterrent has been proved wrong by the implementation of it through history.
 Sent2: There is absolutely ZERO evidence that the death penalty deters crime.

A: Similar
****
Q: Sent1: There are also people who will tell you that the death penalty actually kills innocent people.
 Sent2: My argument is that innocent people have been killed by the death penalty.

A:
Similar
****