We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

Input: Consider Input: This decision, Cases v US, is where the militia connection qualification (fn2) was born and another, US v Tot is where the "state's right" interpretations (fn3) came into being

Output: Valid


Input: Consider Input: Just one month after the September 11 terrorist attacks, an unnamed Washington state woman was stopped for having a loaded two-shot derringer in her carry-on baggage at Sea-Tac Airport.

Output: Valid


Input: Consider Input: Name me one gun control law that has been effective as crime control!!!!!!


Output: Valid