We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

[EX Q]: Yet there's no proof that would support the banning of these weapons would provide any measure of safety to anyone other than criminals.
[EX A]: Valid

[EX Q]: I for one do NOT consider them a Constitutional enterprise and if they were stupid enough to think that the AFT would protect them instead of selling them out that is the same as admission for criminal intent.
[EX A]: Valid

[EX Q]: Thus, if petitioners are correct, the Second Amendment protects citizens' right to use a gun in an organization from which Congress has plenary authority to exclude them.
[EX A]:
Valid