In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

[EX Q]: Sentence: Frank felt crushed when his longtime rival Bill revealed that he was the winner of the competition.
 Reason: The 'he' refers to bill because yes, the red should refer to Frank. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
[EX A]: Wrong

[EX Q]: Sentence: When the sponsors of the bill got to the town hall, they were surprised to find that the room was full of opponents. They were very much in the minority.
 Reason: The 'They' refers to the sponsors because there were lots of opponents. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
[EX A]: Correct

[EX Q]: Sentence: If the con artist has succeeded in fooling Sam, he would have lost a lot of money.
 Reason: The 'he' refers to sam because people do not lose money for fooling people. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
[EX A]:
Correct