Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.

[Q]: Their donations were chump change!
[A]: Yes


[Q]: Sorry Old Soul, I disagree and reality is not on the side of your argument. Women ARE the only people who can reproduce, men being only reproductive. The law is contrived and based on outmoded ideas including the institution of marriage--a throwback to the days of women being unable to own property, work outside the home, etc. 
It seems to me that with the inviolable right to abortion (currently it is a right that is routinely violated, but the US is obviously a backward country) comes the obligation for women to acknowledge that when they choose to allow a pregnancy to come to term and produce a child, they bear the sole responsibility for raising the child. Should they choose to allow another person involvement in the raising of the child, the biological father--whoever--that is their prerogative. To the extent the biological father is involved I would assume that it is contingent upon his active participation. There could be circumstances where the father parents on his own.
[A]: No


[Q]: I wont go to Alaska untill useless cowards will be ruled for slaughter strong wild children like the wolves! Taiga belongs to the wolves that struggle for the life. Taiga doesnt belong to the guilty business of caribou-meat! Caribou-herders cancer of the taiga! Wolves and bears and coguars free to be wild children!
[A]:
Yes