We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

[Q]: Sent1: I don't think the death penalty should be banned.
 Sent2: I believe there are certain crimes where the death penalty is an acceptable punishment.
[A]: Similar


[Q]: Sent1: Statistics show that capital punishment is no more of a deterrent than life without parole so I fail to see your arguement about society needing capital punishment.
 Sent2: Almost every study I've seen on the deterrent effect of the death penalty has suggested that it's no more effective than life imprisonment.
[A]: Similar


[Q]: Sent1: The notion that innocent people may be sentenced to death is not a death penalty problem, it is a judicial system problem.
 Sent2: A perfect judiciary system would not sentence innocent people, and would alleviate all problems with the death penalty.
[A]:
Similar