We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

[EX Q]: Sent1: I support the death penalty, but feel there needs to be a better system of checks and balances to ensure each individual gets a fair trial using all evidentiary methods available.
 Sent2: There shouldn't be a death penalty it isn't fair.
[EX A]: Not similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: The death penalty (because of appeals) costs more than solitary confinement for life, both of which would ensure that the person would never kill again.
 Sent2: Can life imprisonment for a definite yes, prevent a murderer from killing again?
[EX A]: Not similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: The death penalty has not been shown to be more effective than life imprisonment in deterring murder, hence we should choose life imprisonment.
 Sent2: Can life imprisonment for a definite yes, prevent a murderer from killing again?
[EX A]:
Not similar