In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: threat and non-threat. Threat is a statement that someone will be hurt or harmed, especially if the person does not do something in particular.

Ex Input:
Comment: So, to summarize, people who voted for Donald Trump and disagreed with you are stupid?

Ex Output:
Non-threat


Ex Input:
Comment: very ironic that Donkey Trump suddenly wants military discipline & structure
he got DQ'd from military draft cuz he told the board he had "low T"
I recall his many statements that the WH was gonna run sooo smoooothly once he "drained the swamp" & installed business people into the administration

Ex Output:
Non-threat


Ex Input:
Comment: That's james martin's own (now quite old) article!  He's part of the mafia/lobby.  He's not objective.

Of course it's a rational act to look at the numbers from John Jay and draw a conclusion that a male priest seeking another post-pubescent male is a "same sex" act, abuse or otherwise.

A 35 year old male seeking sex with a 17 year old male is more similar to gay sex between a 35 year old male seeking sex with an 18 year old male, than any act between an adult and a 2 year old!.  

We must return to rationality, and avoid the "advocate" thinking, such as what james martin pushes.

Ex Output:

Non-threat