We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

[EX Q]: Canada, Switzerland, Finland and scores of other countries allow for legal gun ownership but don't have a higher number of gun deaths than countries where guns are illegal.
[EX A]: Valid

[EX Q]: Now he is getting off topic on an argument he cannot sustain by trying to discredit the militia clause of the Second Amendment and argue for less rights and more gun control.
[EX A]: Valid

[EX Q]: Careful reading of the Second Amendment clearly indicates that the principle of gun ownership is based upon the first phrase of the Amendment:
[EX A]:
Valid