We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Example Input: Giving the criminals as many possibilities to get away with their crimes.
Example Output: Invalid

Example Input: Almost like how a liberal will bemoan a corporations concearn for it's share holders over thinking of the damage it does to the environment and shoddly product it pushes onto consumers.
Example Output: Invalid

Example Input: The death penalty is much more expensive than life without parole because...blah.blah.blah...*
Example Output:
Valid