In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.
--------
Question: Comment: Totally ignorant of the law and Constitution, aren't you?

Answer: Non-obscene


Question: Comment: Prorogue
Harper proroguing Parliament was to stop an UNDEMOCRATIC attempt by the sore losers to form a Coalition to steal the election from the winning Conservatives
.
it was pathetic watching such "democrats" as Chretien and Ed Broadbent trotting up Parliament Hill with that intention
.
Proroguing by Harper is a tool in the Rule Book, so it is not undemocratic at all

Answer: Non-obscene


Question: Comment: Warren Buffet has said publicly many times that the laws and policies that allowed him to become thousands of times richer than the average person are destructive of our nation, and that taxes on the very wealthy should be much higher to offset the effects of robbing the poor to give to the rich.

By the way, this study ignores a lot of people in other nations who are far richer. Vladimir Putin, for instance, was estimated to have 70 billion dollars in 2012.

That great wealth is built on taxes on those who actually labor to make those companies profitable. Those who "made" those companies never lifted a single brick into place. Without labor, they would be nothing. I say to you, Unknown, "don't be dumb".

Answer:
Non-obscene