Categorize the comment on the basis of obscenity. If the comment is obscene output Yes, otherwise output No.

Ex Input:
The writer shouldn't feel too sorry for Chile because they turned against their home-grown socialist problem in the 1970s, rather than become another technological and economic backwater like Cuba.  Today Chile is arguably one of the best-run countries in the western hemisphere, economically and politically.  Arguably they are even more 'progressive' than the USA - after all, they have already elected a woman president!  ;-)

Chile is not a 'third-world' country by any stretch of the imagination, despite what the writer of this letter implies.

Ex Output:
No


Ex Input:
There is this existential balancing act that a responsible person has to manage between ensuring rights and providing security. Too many can't grasp that concept unfortunately.

Ex Output:
No


Ex Input:
The writer did not mention illegal immigration. If you are referring to the writer's characterization of Trump as a racist, there are more factors here than his over-the-top approach to that problem; specifically, his completely reprehensible proposal to ban Muslims from entering the country. Maybe "racist" isn't the best word; I prefer "xenophobic".

Ex Output:

Yes