In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: insult and non-insult. Insult is any lanugage or act that is disrespectful or scornfully abusive.
--------
Question: Comment: Agree that Bannon's pushing to get out of the Paris Accord was a terrible move.

"Climate Change" is the closest thing there is to a world religion.  Even the DPRK has signed on to the Paris Accord, not of course, that it really affects them in any material way.

Giving notice to withdraw from the Paris Accord has been a complete disaster with respect to the allies we desperately need during this extremely perilous time.  The U.K., France, and Germany are good examples of this.

Trump should have simply smiled and pursued the tact that Xi & Modi have -- i.e.  tacit agreement but still acting in their nation's best interest.

Since Bannon helped to orchestrate Trump's upset win he's certainly not an "idiot" with respect to grass roots politics.  He might well be deemed an "idiot" for the disastrous effect his climate change stance has had on our geo-political security.

Do you have any specific examples which prove that Bannon is a "racist?"

Thanks.

Answer: Insult


Question: Comment: Anyone remember Rachel Marsden who appeared on the O"Reilly Factor in 2005? She was virtually unknown  here except for charges levied back and forth between her and a swim coach at SFU of sexual harassment, and she was a real flake who had other brushes with the law. Yet to FOX viewers she was passed off as having the knowledge and stature to represent Canada.

Answer: Non-insult


Question: Comment: One must wonder what the reasoning ability is of a person who believes that the funds providing a subsidy for those with disabilities were the result of the ACA and that people with disabilities received little or no assistance from Medicaid prior to the law being enacted.  The term "useful idiots" springs to mind.

Answer:
Insult