In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Example Input: Comment: The question I have for BLM is: why aren't you hijacking and staging a sit-in at Toronto's Caribbean Festival Parade in August to highlight your message and agenda? It would seem like you would have a far more receptive and understanding audience there.
But no. BLM is blatantly using Pride because it is a bigger, broader, more popular and better-attended event. BLM absolutely does not care at all about the gay community; if so, they would be highlighting the homophobia and anti-gay violence in Caribbean and African counties, where gays have absolutely no rights at all.
The police absolutely must be allowed to march in next year's Pride parade. And BLM, by having violated the rules on parade participation on Sunday, must be banned.
Example Output: Non-obscene

Example Input: Comment: and another ignorant one, trump is not the usual he is a leader who knows how to bargain from strength, not being sheep like obama and justin
Example Output: Non-obscene

Example Input: Comment: Militias, well-regulated and all. Sort of like the National Guard. Well, EXACTLY like the National Guard, as a matter of fact. A well-regulated militia comprised of citizen soldiers. Not a bunch of tubby rednecks galumphing around their backyards hiding behind trees and plinking away at fake targets.
Example Output:
Non-obscene