In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: threat and non-threat. Threat is a statement that someone will be hurt or harmed, especially if the person does not do something in particular.

Ex Input:
Comment: "Soylent Orange" is Trumpism. Sessions said "it's an honor to be able to SERVE you". Really? you swore an oath to serve our country, not a demagogue. Your loyalty is required to be to our constitutional principles, not to any person. 
That ridiculous 'fawning fan fest of flattery' was the most embarrassing and gratuitous display of brown-nosing I have ever witnessed. Does this weak leader have no humility? Does his fragile egomania require constant praise?

Ex Output:
Non-threat


Ex Input:
Comment: And your point is?
Who is it in Canada now that you think lacks equality under the law?
Or are you just looking for yet another reason to whine and complain, and imagine unfairness where none exists? 
Because you are promoting precisely the same type of division and hatred and contempt that you claim to oppose.
That, my friend, is the politics of hate, and it's game you're playing most deceitfully.
It's a game that will lead to a very destructive outcome, to the point that already we are seeing the benefits of the community that the Ukrainians and others worked so hard to build now being eroded.
Adult children who have NO IDEA how fortunate and spoiled they are, are so busy having tantrums about imagined unfairnesses they are completely unprepared for the real dangers of an increasingly unstable world.
So enjoy the whining while you can, because if you keep it up for much longer, you'll look back in 10 years with profound regret at what you've lost, through stupidity and infantilism.

Ex Output:
Non-threat


Ex Input:
Comment: Interesting idea. So by killing those with undesirable traits, we are sort of semi-domesticating urban coyotes.

Ex Output:

Threat