In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

Ex Input:
Comment: Mr. Trump repeatedly exposes himself as a crude, crass misogynistic lout.  To note that those are unattractive characteristics in a Presidential candidate doesn't constitute "character assassination."  If you're not bothered by his values, that's your choice.  If you actually share his misogynistic view of women, that's your choice.  

Your defense of Trump is pathetic....the old "hey, everybody does it" sounds like a plea to a Junior High School vice principal.  No, Dun., not everybody is as crude and crass as Donald Trump.  
I know hundreds of men and, over my 74 years I've never been around someone who has made comments like Mr. Trump's.  

He's surrounded by sycophants (that's PC for #@$#kissers) so those comments have been accepted and reinforced.  The man is pathetic....but, that hardly qualifies him to be president.  He's embarrassing enough as a candidate.  It's simply unthinkable that he could be president.

Ex Output:
Non-identity-attack


Ex Input:
Comment: This story is about a left wing black man who "expresses disdain for President Donald Trump and white people generally." I'm not sure about the purpose of your rant.

Ex Output:
Identity-attack


Ex Input:
Comment: As Clive Bundy and his ilk proved a couple of years ago, you can LITERALLY point assault weapons at federal agents and reap NO consequences. Have to be White though.

Ex Output:

Identity-attack