In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.

Input: Consider Input: Comment: I hope the governor keeps this in mind as the decision to dedicate state resources is made: 

"Local residents in 2013 rejected a proposal to create a new taxing district where property owners would pay for flood and erosion control. The new district could have paid for dike repairs."

This sounds like a good opportunity for people who don't want the government in their lives to step up and take care of themselves.

Output: Agree


Input: Consider Input: Comment: I was raised a Christian and I don't understand the outrage at all. Forcing ALL children to repeat the Lord's Prayer, no matter what their religion, is clearly not going to work. However, allowing students to voluntarily gather in an unused classroom to discuss their religion is not unreasonable.

Output: Disagree


Input: Consider Input: Comment: This article does what most articles that profess to express facts but are really opinion pieces does: It selects facts to try to bolster the opinion and make the opinion sound as if it is uncontrovertible evidence. The author mixes up "power" and "energy", global electricity production statistics and total energy consumption-related emissions - either deliberately or because he doesn't have a full grasp of the subject matter. And of course he uses the tired argument that because Canada is such a small producer of global greenhouse gas emissions that we shouln't be compelled to do something about our emissions. As the author is no doubt aware, that kind of thinking leads to global inaction on climate change, but then, that's probably what he wants. One little parting statistic: China is very committed to the Paris Climate Change Agreement and it alone represents 28% of total global greenhouse gas emissions from fossil fuel combustion.


Output: Disagree