We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Ex Input:
Sent1: i think that life without opportunity of parole is the more humane and just punishment instead of the death penalty.
 Sent2: If convicts believe their innocence, appeals through life imprisonment is much more justifiable because it is easier to atone for a life imprisonment as opposed to death.

Ex Output:
Not similar


Ex Input:
Sent1: Can life imprisonment for a definite yes, prevent a murderer from killing again?
 Sent2: But life imprisonment without parole also deters the criminal from recommitting.

Ex Output:
Similar


Ex Input:
Sent1: Indeed, on average, states with the death penalty have more murders per capita - probably because local economy is a higher differentiating influence.
 Sent2: Indeed, the states with the death penalty on average have a higher per capita murder rate than those without - suggesting that other factors (economy, etc.) play a much larger role.

Ex Output:

Similar