We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

[Q]: Sent1: Are you saying that since all guns have been banned for civilian use in Countries like England, that murders by guns and gun crimes have gone to absolute zero there?
 Sent2: Some people who want to ban guns try to use simplistic arguments to suggest that murder rates are tied to the number of guns available for criminal misuse; and they suggest more guns = more crime and less guns = less crime.
[A]: Not similar


[Q]: Sent1: Of course, when the founders wrote the Second Amendment they had in mind people owning much less powerful weapons than gun owners have now.
 Sent2: We're talking about deadly lethal weapons that are way more powerful than what the authors of the Second Amendment had in mind.
[A]: Similar


[Q]: Sent1: We didn't ban all guns, just most of them, because our farmers need them and our police need them.
 Sent2: Do you expect us to do it with single shot rifles and BB guns, because the government found that our handguns and AR-15s aren't suitable for civilian ownership and banned them?
[A]:
Not similar