In this task, you are given text for US Congressional and California state bills, your task is to generate a summary for this bill.

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Digital Trade Act of 2013''.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS; SENSE OF CONGRESS.

    (a) Findings.--Congress makes the following findings:
            (1) The Internet has become an unprecedented medium for 
        competition, trade, free expression, and access to information.
            (2) The Internet is a driver of the global economy and must 
        remain open, stable, and secure.
            (3) Trade in Internet-enabled services and transfers of 
        data and other digital information have become increasingly 
        critical drivers of the economic growth of the United States. 
        The United States International Trade Commission found in a 
        July 2013 report, entitled ``Digital Trade in the U.S. and 
        Global Economies, Part 1'', that ``U.S. exports of digitally 
        enabled services (one measure of international digital trade) 
        grew from $282.1 billion in 2007 to $356.1 billion in 2011, 
        with exports exceeding imports every year''.
            (4) The United States is the global leader in Internet-
        enabled platforms, networks, and services. Certain liability 
        protections for those entities under the law of the United 
        States, which promote innovation and creativity and allow for 
        cooperative efforts to address harmful activity, have been 
        critical to the growth of the Internet economy in the United 
        States.
            (5) According to McKinsey & Company, more than \3/4\ of the 
        value added by the Internet is in traditional industries.
            (6) Internet-enabled commerce and digital trade benefits 
        small- and medium-size enterprises by providing unparalleled 
        access to global markets.
            (7) Proposals have been put forward by some trading 
        partners of the United States to restrict the flow of lawful 
        information across borders. Those proposals would cause 
        increased government control over the Internet and could create 
        a fragmented Internet.
            (8) Localization barriers to trade are frequently used to 
        protect, favor, or stimulate domestic industries at the expense 
        of industries in other countries. Those localization 
        requirements harm the competitiveness of and end-users in the 
        United States.
            (9) Restrictive policies regarding the flow of information 
        across borders are nontariff barriers that are harmful to 
        innovation and economic advancement. Those policies impede 
        trade in digital products and services and constrain the 
        ability of United States companies from many sectors to 
        effectively operate across borders.
            (10) Cross-border data flows are critical to manufacturers, 
        institutions of higher education, hospitals, retailers, 
        financial services firms, laboratories, and many other 
        organizations that use the Internet to improve their 
        productivity and manage global networks of customers, 
        suppliers, researchers, and employees.
            (11) The free flow of information across borders provides 
        choices and reduces costs to consumers worldwide.
            (12) The position of the United States Government has been 
        and is to advocate for the free flow of information across 
        borders.
    (b) Sense of Congress.--It is the sense of Congress that--
            (1) agencies in the executive branch, including the Office 
        of the United States Trade Representative, should be staffed 
        with experts and leaders to fulfill the mission of promoting an 
        open, global Internet that facilitates commerce and digital 
        trade; and
            (2) private sector stakeholders should have the opportunity 
        to formally inform efforts of agencies in the executive branch 
        related to digital trade.

SEC. 3. NEGOTIATING PRINCIPLES FOR INTERNET-ENABLED COMMERCE AND 
              DIGITAL TRADE.

    It shall be a negotiating principle of the United States in 
negotiations for a bilateral, plurilateral, or multilateral agreement, 
and in multi-stakeholder fora, to seek the inclusion of binding and 
enforceable provisions that promote and enhance Internet-enabled 
commerce and digital trade, including provisions--
            (1) preventing or eliminating barriers to the movement of 
        electronic information across borders, including by encouraging 
        interoperability of data protection regimes and eliminating 
        barriers to accessing, processing, transferring, or storing 
        information;
            (2) ensuring transparency in measures affecting the free 
        flow of information within and across borders;
            (3) continuing the current practice of not imposing customs 
        duties on electronic transmissions;
            (4) prohibiting measures that condition market access or 
        other commercial benefits on localization of data, 
        infrastructure, or investment;
            (5) prohibiting any country from imposing measures that 
        require an entity to use computing infrastructure or services 
        in that country or otherwise require an entity to access, 
        process, transfer, or store data in the territory of that 
        country;
            (6) ensuring that the Internet continues to operate within 
        the successful multi-stakeholder governance model;
            (7) ensuring that provisions affecting intermediary 
        liability for Internet-enabled platforms, networks, and 
        services are consistent with the law of the United States;
            (8) ensuring digital trade policies contemplate various 
        business activities across all industrial sectors and allow for 
        future technological advancement; and
            (9) otherwise eliminating discriminatory treatment of 
        Internet-enabled commerce and digital trade.
Digital Trade Act of 2013 - Expresses the sense of Congress that: (1) executive branch agencies, including the Office of the United States Trade Representative, should be staffed with experts and leaders to promote an open, global Internet that facilitates commerce and digital trade; and (2) private sector stakeholders should have the opportunity to inform executive agency efforts related to digital trade.  States that it shall be a U.S. negotiating principle in negotiations for a bilateral, plurilateral, or multilateral agreement, and in multi-stakeholder fora, to seek the inclusion of binding provisions that promote and enhance Internet-enabled commerce and digital trade.

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Crop Insurance Subsidy Reduction Act 
of 2013''.

SEC. 2. REDUCTION IN SHARE OF CROP INSURANCE PREMIUM PAID BY FEDERAL 
              CROP INSURANCE CORPORATION.

    Section 508(e)(2) of the Federal Crop Insurance Act (7 U.S.C. 
1508(e)(2)) is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (B)(i), by striking ``67'' and 
        inserting ``55'';
            (2) in subparagraph (E)(i), by striking ``55'' and 
        inserting ``24'';
            (3) in subparagraph (F)(i), by striking ``48'' and 
        inserting ``17'';
            (4) in subparagraph (G)(i), by striking ``38'' and 
        inserting ``13'';
            (5) by redesignating subparagraphs (C) through (G) as 
        subparagraphs (G) through (K), respectively; and
            (6) by inserting after subparagraph (B) the following:
                    ``(C) In the case of additional coverage equal to 
                or greater than 55 percent, but less than 60 percent, 
                of the recorded or appraised average yield indemnified 
                at not greater than 100 percent of the expected market 
                price, or a comparable coverage for a policy or plan of 
                insurance that is not based on individual yield, the 
                amount shall be equal to the sum of--
                            ``(i) 46 percent of the amount of the 
                        premium established under subsection 
                        (d)(2)(B)(i) for the coverage level selected; 
                        and
                            ``(ii) the amount determined under 
                        subsection (d)(2)(B)(ii) for the coverage level 
                        selected to cover operating and administrative 
                        expenses.
                    ``(D) In the case of additional coverage equal to 
                or greater than 60 percent, but less than 65 percent, 
                of the recorded or appraised average yield indemnified 
                at not greater than 100 percent of the expected market 
                price, or a comparable coverage for a policy or plan of 
                insurance that is not based on individual yield, the 
                amount shall be equal to the sum of--
                            ``(i) 38 percent of the amount of the 
                        premium established under subsection 
                        (d)(2)(B)(i) for the coverage level selected; 
                        and
                            ``(ii) the amount determined under 
                        subsection (d)(2)(B)(ii) for the coverage level 
                        selected to cover operating and administrative 
                        expenses.
                    ``(E) In the case of additional coverage equal to 
                or greater than 65 percent, but less than 70 percent, 
                of the recorded or appraised average yield indemnified 
                at not greater than 100 percent of the expected market 
                price, or a comparable coverage for a policy or plan of 
                insurance that is not based on individual yield, the 
                amount shall be equal to the sum of--
                            ``(i) 42 percent of the amount of the 
                        premium established under subsection 
                        (d)(2)(B)(i) for the coverage level selected; 
                        and
                            ``(ii) the amount determined under 
                        subsection (d)(2)(B)(ii) for the coverage level 
                        selected to cover operating and administrative 
                        expenses.
                    ``(F) In the case of additional coverage equal to 
                or greater than 70 percent, but less than 75 percent, 
                of the recorded or appraised average yield indemnified 
                at not greater than 100 percent of the expected market 
                price, or a comparable coverage for a policy or plan of 
                insurance that is not based on individual yield, the 
                amount shall be equal to the sum of--
                            ``(i) 32 percent of the amount of the 
                        premium established under subsection 
                        (d)(2)(B)(i) for the coverage level selected; 
                        and
                            ``(ii) the amount determined under 
                        subsection (d)(2)(B)(ii) for the coverage level 
                        selected to cover operating and administrative 
                        expenses.''.

SEC. 3. BUDGETARY EFFECTS.

    The budgetary effects of this Act, for the purpose of complying 
with the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010, shall be determined by 
reference to the latest statement titled ``Budgetary Effects of PAYGO 
Legislation'' for this Act, submitted for printing in the Congressional 
Record by the Chairman of the Senate Budget Committee, provided that 
such statement has been submitted prior to the vote on passage.
Crop Insurance Subsidy Reduction Act of 2013 - Amends the Federal Crop Insurance Act to reduce crop insurance premium subsidy rates.

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Safe and Responsible Handgun Act of 
1996''.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

    The Congress finds that--
            (1) certain handguns that are widely marketed across State 
        lines are traced disproportionately to violent crimes, and in 
        particular to crimes in States other than those in which they 
        were manufactured or purchased;
            (2) many of these handguns are of dangerously poor quality 
        and threaten the safety even of legitimate users for sport or 
        self-defense;
            (3) States should be encouraged to restrict the sale of 
        handguns that are unsafe, particularly suited for crime, and 
        not useful for sporting, hunting, law enforcement, or self-
        defense purposes; and
            (4) accurate and uniform data on the use of guns is 
        essential to formulating effective policy to reduce violent 
        crime involving guns and deaths and injuries from such crimes.

SEC. 3. REDUCTION OF BYRNE GRANTS FOR STATES NOT ELECTING TO ESTABLISH 
              HANDGUN ROSTER BOARDS.

    (a) Handgun Roster Boards.--
            (1) Establishment.--The Secretary of the Treasury shall 
        establish guidelines for the establishment by each State of a 
        Handgun Roster Board (in this Act referred to as the ``Board'') 
        which, at a minimum, meets the following requirements:
                    (A) The Board shall consist of 9 members, each of 
                whom shall be eligible to vote in an election for 
                officials of the State, and--
                            (i) 1 of whom shall be a representative of 
                        the police;
                            (ii) 1 of whom shall be a representative of 
                        the State prosecutor's office;
                            (iii) 1 of whom shall be a representative 
                        of a State organization, or a local chapter of 
                        a national organization, which advocates the 
                        rights of fireams owners;
                            (iv) 1 of whom shall be a representative of 
                        handgun dealers or manufacturers;
                            (v) 1 of whom shall be a representative of 
                        a State organization, or local chapter of a 
                        national organization, which advocates greater 
                        control of handguns; and
                            (vi) 3 of whom shall not meet any 
                        requirement of clauses (i) through (v).
                    (B) The Board shall designate 1 of its members as 
                the chairman of the Board.
            (2) Publication of roster.--Not less frequently than 
        annually, the Board shall publish a roster which specifies the 
        types of handguns which may be lawfully manufactured, sold, 
        owned, possessed, or used in the State, and any terms, 
conditions, or circumstances under which such types of handguns may be 
so manufactured, sold, owned, possessed, or used, and shall transmit a 
copy of the roster to each licensed dealer in the State who is not 
prohibited by State law from dealing in handguns.
            (3) Factors to be considered.--In deciding whether to 
        include a type of handgun on the roster, the Board shall 
        consider the following factors:
                    (A) Concealability.
                    (B) Ballistic accuracy.
                    (C) Portability.
                    (D) Quality of materials.
                    (E) Quality of manufacture.
                    (F) Safety features.
                    (G) Caliber.
                    (H) Detectability by the standard security 
                equipment commonly used at airports or courthouses and 
                approved by the Federal Aviation Administration for use 
                at airports in the United States.
                    (I) Utility for legitimate sporting activities, 
                hunting, self-protection, or law enforcement.
            (4) Procedural rule.--The Board may include a type of 
        handgun on the roster upon the Board's initiative, or upon the 
        petition of any person.
            (5) Laws relating to handguns.--
                    (A) In general.--The State shall have in effect 
                such laws as may be necessary to make unlawful in the 
                State the manufacture, sale, ownership, possession, and 
                use of--
                            (i) any handgun which is of a type not 
                        specified on the roster published by the Board 
                        pursuant to paragraph (2); and
                            (ii) any handgun which is of a type 
                        specified on the roster published by the Board 
                        pursuant to paragraph (2), except under such 
                        terms and conditions as the Board may specify.
                    (B) Penalties for certain violations.--
                            (i) Unlawful manufacture of handgun.--Such 
                        laws shall provide that any person who 
                        unlawfully manufactures a handgun for 
                        distribution or sale shall be fined not more 
                        than $10,000 and be subject to such other 
                        penalties as may be provided for by State law.
                            (ii) Unlawful sale or offer of handgun.--
                        Such laws shall provide that any person who 
                        unlawfully sells a handgun or offers a handgun 
                        for sale shall be fined not more than $2,500 
                        and be subject to such other penalties as may 
                        be provided for by State law.
                            (iii) Separate violations.--Such laws shall 
                        provide that a violation of such laws involving 
                        2 or more handguns shall constitute separate 
                        violations of such laws with respect to each 
                        handgun involved.
                    (C) Exemption for certain lawfully possessed 
                handguns.--Subparagraph (A) shall not be construed to 
                require the State laws described in subparagraph (A) to 
                apply to any handgun lawfully possessed on the date of 
                the enactment of the law.
            (6) Definitions.--As used in this subsection:
                    (A) Handgun.--The term ``handgun'' shall have the 
                meaning given such term by section 921(a)(29) of title 
                18, United States Code.
                    (B) Licensed dealer.--The term ``licensed dealer'' 
                shall have the meaning given such term by section 
921(a)(11) of title 18, United States Code.
    (b) Compliance.--
            (1) Compliance date.--Each State shall have not more than 3 
        years from the date of enactment of this Act in which to comply 
        with subsection (a), except that the Attorney General may grant 
        an additional 2 years to a State that is making good faith 
        efforts to implement subsection (a).
            (2) Ineligibility for funds.--
                    (A) In general.--A State that fails to comply with 
                subsection (a) of this section within the period 
                prescribed by or under paragraph (1) of this subsection 
                shall not receive 10 percent of the funds that would 
                otherwise be allocated to the State under section 506 
                of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 
                1968.
                    (B) Reallocation of funds.--Any funds that are not 
                allocated to a State because of the failure of the 
                State to comply with subsection (a) shall be 
                reallocated to States that comply with subsection (a).

SEC. 4. INDEPENDENT STUDY GROUP.

    (a) Establishment.--The Secretary of the Treasury, in cooperation 
with the Attorney General, shall establish Independent Study Group (in 
this section referred to as the ``ISG'') for the purpose of devising an 
effective national firearms injury reporting system.
    (b) Membership.--The ISG shall be composed of representatives from 
the Consumer Product Safety Commission, the Centers for Disease 
Control, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms, the Federal 
Bureau of Investigation, and the National Institute of Justice.
    (c) Duties.--The ISG shall study the feasibility of collecting data 
on the following, at a minimum:
            (1) Intentional and unintentional firearms injuries.
            (2) Fatal and nonfatal firearms injuries;
            (3) The date, time, type of location of firearms injuries, 
        and whether they occurred during and in relation to the 
        commission of another crime.
            (4) The type, make, model, caliber, serial number, and year 
        of manufacture of the firearms involved.
            (5) The demographic characteristics of persons suffering 
        firearm injuries and person causing the injuries.
            (6) The identity of the owner of the firearms involved, and 
        how the firearms were stored.
            (7) Whether the firearms involved were stolen.
            (8) Whether and how drugs or alcohol were involved.
    (d) Report.--Within 1 year after the date of the enactment of this 
Act, the Secretary of the Treasury shall prepare and submit to the 
Congress a report recommending how an effective national firearms 
injury reporting system could be established, including how to avoid 
duplication of effort, and who would administer such a system.

Safe and Responsible Handgun Act of 1996 - Directs:  (1) the Secretary of the Treasury to establish guidelines for the establishment by each State of a Handgun Roster Board; and (2) each Board to publish a roster of types of handguns which may be lawfully manufactured, sold, owned, possessed, or used (manufactured) in the State and any terms, conditions, or circumstances under which such handgun types may be manufactured and to transmit a copy of the roster to each licensed dealer in the State who is not prohibited by State law from dealing in handguns. 
Sets forth factors to be considered in deciding whether to include a handgun type on the roster, including concealability, safety features, and detectability by standard security equipment used at airports or courthouses. 
Requires States to have in effect such laws as necessary to prohibit the manufacture, sale, ownership, possession, and use of:  (1) any handgun which is of a type not specified on the roster; and (2) any handgun which is of a type specified on the roster, except under such terms and conditions as the Board may specify. 
Sets forth provisions regarding:  (1) penalties for the unlawful manufacture, sale, or offer for sale of a handgun; (2) State compliance; and (3) ineligibility of States not in compliance for formula grants under the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968. 
Directs the Secretary to establish an Independent Study Group to devise an effective national firearms injury reporting system.