In this task, you must classify if a given review is positive/negative, indicating your answer as P or N.

Input: Consider Input: " desperate measures " was something i was excited about seeing back when it was originally scheduled to be released : summer ' 97 . for some reason , it was delayed until hollywood 's traditional dumping ground : january .
now that it 's out , i see no real reason for that delay , as it 's a simple yet highly entertaining film .
michael keaton stars as a maniacial murderer who 's bone marrow can save the life of the dying son of a san francisco police detective ( garcia ) .
keaton agrees to the transplant , only so he can attempt escape .
he succeeds , in a plan that of course could only work in the movies .
the police force is now trying to kill keaton , while garcia is working against them trying to keep keaton alive in order to save his son .
the film definately has it 's flaws .
the plot is strictly tv movie of the week fare , but the acting and direction certainly boost it far above that status .
also , after keaton 's escape , garcia 's captain barks at him " how many men have to die to save your kid 's life ? " which the film treats as such an evil and insignificant remark .
the thing is , it 's a vaild point .
how many people have to be needlessly crippled , burned , and killed just to save this one child ?
what 's the greater good here ?
many lives or one life ?
if movies really had guts nowadays , i would have loved to have seen this movie come down to a final choice for garcia 's character .
place him in a situation where he knows that he has to kill keaton because keaton is about to kill someone else .
alas , movies these days generally have no such ambition to pull the audience 's strings in ways which might make the uncomfortable .
despite a few silly moments ( and one or two really stupid ones ) , the good things about " desperate measures " outnumber the bad .
the main highlight would be keaton 's performance .
the character could have easily been an overacting , scene chewing freak , but keaton underplays it nicely .
he 's not as menacing as he was in " pacific heights " or even as menacing as he was in " batman
" ( yes kids , batman used to be a dark character ) , but you certainly get the idea that he 's evil .
even the final scene of the film , which normally i would just hate , seems strangely appropriate for this film .
so much so that i did n't mind it in the slightest . and another bonus : the film takes place in san francisco , which usually means a car chase on those hills that you 've seen a billion times before .
and for a moment , it looked as though it was about to happen .
but it does n't ,
and that 's creative .
[ r ]

Output: P


Input: Consider Input: as forgetful as some people may be it is doubtful that anyone could forget their wedding , especially three times .
but , alas professor brainard somehow manages to accomplish this feat twice before the momentous night that he actually creates flubber .
it 's amazing that he is able to remember any of the processes he uses to make anything .
the whole point here is how could a man be so blatantly forgetful .
this is not absent minded this is almost mindless and he is a professor .
well , this is the case for about the first half of the movie then things begin to settle into what might truly be considered absent minded .
along the way to becoming absent minded from absent of mind the professor stumbles onto flubber .
thankfully or there would be no movie or any amusement for the audience .
the flubber is supposed to be flying rubber , but it seems to have a life of its own .
this is there strictly for the kids .
the properties of the flubber provide some antics for the audience when flubber coated golfballs and bowling balls
assail
two would be thugs .
although amusing this is not original what so ever and brings back haunting memories of home alone .
the poor professor has to save the university where he teaches at , get his fiancee back , finally stop the plotting of an evil millionaire , and do all this in the funniest way possible .
admittedly there are funny moments but
the movie is rather shallow and does not compare very well to the original ( the absent minded professor ) .
the whole scene with the basketball game was just atrocious and totally unbelievable .
the basketball players , stereotypically unqualified for the sport , somehow manage to bounce , fly and dribble their way back to being close to winning ?
this just sounds too bad to be true , the least that could have been done was keep semi close to the original movie to give this film a chance .
as for innovations and new ideas there is but two good ones in this movie .
giving life to the flubber , which is so poorly executed that it 's best forgotten , and prof .
brainard 's flying robot weebo .
giving life to the flubber would have worked beautifully if it was n't for scenes of the sort where you have the flubber dancing around on tables and books for no real reason other than to put in a bit of music and extend the length of the movie .
the life of the flubber had brief and rather whimsical moments where it might have been used well , but it was n't and in the end might have done the movie more harm than good .
now , weebo is a totally different story .
it 's a robot that prof .
brainard created but forgot how and gave something of a life too .
this is a really original idea , well maybe not , but it is an idea that is well executed and in the end makes the poor robot the most developed and real character in the movie .
yes folks the little yellow robot has more emotion and character than the characters .
the film lacks the emotional punch to pull the audience in at all .
the acting by robin williams ( prof .
brainard ) seems to be half hearted for most of the movie and in many cases quite forced .
most of the acting in the movie was so convincing as to fool only the part of the audience that had not quite yet reached the age to 12 .
people when stood up at the altar , do n't usually give third chances .
or for that matter talk to the fiancee afterwards , but what can be expected this is a children 's movie .
flubber , as a movie
does little original and is nothing special in any respect .
with the best character in the movie being something of a prop
i doubt that many people will find it all that great .
it does have its amusing moments and it is a good story in the end , but it does not wash up to the original .
kids should find this movie amusing and fun
and they 'll probably enjoy the whole movie .
as a movie it 's just a kids movie and not the best of ones at that .

Output: N


Input: Consider Input: this is a stagy film adapted from roger rueff 's play " hospitality suite . ' ' its about three travelling salesmen attending an industrial convention , whose chicago company has sent them to wichita , where the company has paid all their expenses for them to rent a hospitality suite on the 16th floor of the hotel , where they aim to score a substantial account from the big kahuna , someone named dick fuller , who is the head of a big industrial corporation .
he is someone they have never met before , but they want to sell him industrial lubricants
and they want desperately to land this new account , it is their only reason for coming to the convention .
"
the big kahuna " revels in salesmen - talk among the three white christian males , two of them , larry ( spacey ) and phil ( devito ) , who are veteran salesmen , having teamed together for the last twelve years , while bob ( facinelli ) is a young man who has just recently been hired by the firm and works in the research department .
these three are virtually imprisoned in their small hospitality suite waiting to meet the big kahuna , as the focus of this claustrophobic film is on their interactions in the hospitality suite .
the three salesmen have different things on their mind that is troubling them and a different attitude to their job , and they are each going through internal changes that are profoundly altering their life .
the outstanding cast tries to figure out in their own way what they are doing and why .
what comes into question is their opinions on life and death , on god and morality , and on how they make a living .
these are tough questions and the truth seems to be somewhere in their sales pitch .
their dialogue is acerbic , witty , and analytical .
following in the long tradition of salesmen films -- from death of a salesman , the tin men , and glengarry glen ross , as this film tries to get you to see what there is about salesmanship that gets these men high .
in this case , it is landing the big kahuna .
they each are trying to see why he 's on top and why they are chasing after him .
what makes this film different than the others , is its blatant religious message , comparing orthodox religion to what they do , as both must sell their product .
and how after each one 's psyche is stripped clean by the other , there is a pause and some lesson about life has sunk in that is pertinent to each .
the goal in the movie is not in literally landing the big kahuna , but in finding out what bill of goods they sold themselves that made them be salesmen .
larry and phil have one way of doing things and have no qualms of incorporating a sales pitch as part of their life .
bob thinks he is above the fray and he pitches every chance he can get about his belief in jesus christ .
his vacuous character and smug outlook on life are covered by a disarming smile and an eagerness for him to prove in his actions the words of jesus he literally believes in .
bob is a baptist , who takes a very non - questioning and literal attitude about religion .
to just look at another woman and lust after her is a sin , according to the way he reads the bible .
when asked by larry why he married his wife , he seems puzzled and ca n't even say because he loves her , only that marriage is something sacred to him .
the contrast in their personalities is stark .
larry is all business , he simply wants to close the sale .
he comes into the room pumped for the convention , using his attack mode to establish how serious he is about being a salesman .
he criticizes phil for being so placid , for getting such a small suite , for having the cheap food tray of carrot sticks rather than the one of stuffed shrimp , and for being burned - out .
he tells him to go on a vacation .
get a woman .
while phil is reflective on where all his best years have gone for him and is contemplating a career change , now that he is 52 and is painfully divorcing his wife , after having lived too lonely a life on the road for too long .
he now finds himself suffering from some troubling dreams and questioning what he believes in .
he has always been a charmer , shaking everyone 's hand , trying to please his clients while trying to make the sale .
larry is more aggressive as a salesman , he is always a heart attack away from every big sale .
in contrast , bob is only in his twenties and everything seems fresh to him .
this is his first time for him on the road .
when dick fuller does n't arrive at the party the salesmen throw , larry becomes confrontational and asks phil if he spoke to the man himself about the gathering .
when told that he spoke to the secretary , larry throws a tantrum and is resigned to going back to their home office without the new account .
but when they start talking to bob , whom they forced to act as the bartender , they are surprised to learn that fuller did indeed come but was wearing another man 's name tag and that bob spent the entire evening consoling the tycoon over his recently deceased dog and then talking to him about jesus .
bob then tells the boys about a private party fuller is attending afterwards , and that he invited bob to attend .
larry and phil ca n't fathom how bob did n't make a sales pitch .
but they soon take another tact and decide to prep bob on how to get fuller 's attention about their company 's product as they sent him off to meet fuller , and will await his return in the hotel room .
these two sharp salesmen are reduced to waiting for this smug kid to come back and tell them he saved their ass .
the irony of their situation is played out in the darkness of the hotel room , as they stay up late into the night trying to make sense out of their lives .
these three performers were outstanding , each understanding what their role called for , each coming through with a marvelous performance .
the only problem with the film , is that its more of a play than a cinematic experience .
but the insightful dialogue and refreshing dramatics , give it an intelligent selling point and make it a good product to see .


Output: P