We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Example Input: Sent1: If we sentence someone to life in prison, we can always free them at a later time if they are found to be innocent.
 Sent2: When a person does something horrible, we no longer see them as a human that values their life, we just see them as an epitome of hate.
Example Output: Not similar

Example Input: Sent1: The murder rate for the state of New York, a state without the death penalty has increased this year with a higher rate of murder than it was in 2009.
 Sent2: States without the death penalty generally have lower murder rates.
Example Output: Similar

Example Input: Sent1: SO in turn, there is no clear evidence indicating that there is not a detterent value to the death penalty.
 Sent2: Therefore the argument of death as a deterent is a joke.
Example Output:
Similar