instruction:
In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.
question:
Sentence: The fish ate the worm. It was hungry.
 Reason: The 'It' refers to the fish because The worm is the main object that the very (ate) refers to. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
answer:
Wrong


question:
Sentence: The sun was covered by a thick cloud all morning, but luckily, by the time the picnic started, it was gone.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the cloud because it's also a reference to the fact that a large portion of the event was based on the cloud. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
answer:
Wrong


question:
Sentence: Jim comforted Kevin because he was so upset.
 Reason: The 'he' refers to kevin because of his status as a man, the 'him' is likely to refer to a person or organization. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
answer:

Wrong