instruction:
Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
question:
So a verbal threat is a reason to shoot someone?
answer:
Yes


question:
i would think that any legislator who kicks this can down the road would be kissing their chances for surviving this election cycle goodbye.  but what do i know.  we were stupid enough to elect these hacks.  we might still be dumb enough to give them another shot.  i consider myself a conservative independent, but i'll be damned if i'll vote for any incumbent republican candidate who isn't willing to stand up and deal with the problem this session.
answer:
No


question:
cities aren't meant to be in the housing business in the first place, that's a market function. subsidized housing in this country for most part has been an abysmal failure so any notion that the city (or any city)  is responsible for being some kind of economic referee is out of touch. im just tired of bums and derelicts trashing every viable bit of public open space in this city. if ted wheeler can prove he's not an insufferable pussy and either toss those rejects to the curb or let the police actually do their jobs properly, then he'll get my  vote. otherwise get off my lawn....
answer:

Yes