In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

[Q]: Sentence: The firemen arrived before the police because they were coming from so far away.
 Reason: The 'they' refers to the police because only the police could have pulled the firemen out of the burning building. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
[A]: Wrong


[Q]: Sentence: The customer walked into the bank and stabbed one of the tellers. He was immediately taken to the police station.
 Reason: The 'He' refers to the customer because it is the man who stabbed the woman in the stomach. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
[A]: Wrong


[Q]: Sentence: Sam broke both his ankles and he's walking with crutches. But a month or so from now they should be better.
 Reason: The 'they' refers to the ankles because month or so from now they should be better Sam broke both his ankles and he's walking with crutches. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
[A]:
Correct