In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

[Q]: Comment: Little bit of a double standard here. If you are a guy that makes comments and has great knowledge about Women's fashion you will either be called gay or  they will say you are "in touch with your feminine side" and I guarantee nobody will be expected to apologize to you.
The Little Guy
[A]: Non-sexual-explicit


[Q]: Comment: The meaning of the slang aside, young men are virgins and women pop their "cherries" frequently with happy outcomes for all concerned. "Daddy" does not exclusively denote an actual father but more frequently alludes to an archetypical, and let's be honest here, Oedipal desire. 
In my opinion, the name has more to do with eroticism than sexual assault which is not at all "sexy". Dragging the name "Trump" into the discussion is definitely something that kills an erection--especially the female variety. Clearly, many heterosexual men have boners for Trump. Lol, what turns some men on intelligent women will never understand.
[A]: Sexual-explicit


[Q]: Comment: tempsperdue - Your claim that Trudeau wants to 'emulate these police state types' is ridiculous. No Canadian politician that I have heard of -- Trudeau or anyone else -- is on record as wanting to emulate Chinese police state tactics.
Don't say outlandish things and expect to be believed.
[A]:
Non-sexual-explicit