In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence can be inferred from the statement. Incorrect choices change the meaning in important ways or have details that are not mentioned in the statement. Indicate your answer as 1,2, or 3 corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.

[Q]: Statement: Here was an obviously experienced man coming into this young upstart's company, probably extremely well-dressed and with credentials earned before the CEO was even born. Choices:  1. He was not experienced at all, now does he have credentials or impeccable dress.  2. He worked exceptionally hard to make it into this company and spent his money to achieve the right credentials and clothing.  3. He was an exceptionally experienced man starting in this young company, well dressed with all the right credentials. 
[A]: 3


[Q]: Statement: The wagons will circle to defend this last bastion of human conceit. Choices:  1. They love to defend this awful idea because it means that they are the top dogs in the world. 2. Nobody will come around to defend this idea. 3. People will come from far and wide to defend this mean idea.
[A]: 3


[Q]: Statement: but it should be a standard and and not left up to either the whim or the current overhead rate that's uh that's running in each department Choices:  1. Things should be standardized rather than left up to each department. 2. Department policies are standardized throughout the state. 3. The current system without standardization is absolutely unfair.
[A]:
1