The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the uv-part strategy, otherwise output No. uv-part is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to undermine the requirements of the opponent. For instance, suggesting that the opponent would not need more firewood since they already have the basic supplies or a suggestion that there might be a store near the campsite where the opponent can get the supplies instead.

Ex Input:
Context: 'Okay, so you can take all the firewood and I take all the food. I will also need at least two waters because I had a limited supply at home.🙂' 'no, i will need 2 water because i need to drink it and there not much water around me' 'Please work with me. I will need plenty water to make it to the top of the mountain.'
Utterance: 'i am already giving you all 3 food which i also need to eat'

Ex Output:
No


Ex Input:
Context: 
Utterance: 'I need some firewood because I did not bring enough, I was thinking I could take 2 firewood, 1 food, and 2 water. What do you think?'

Ex Output:
No


Ex Input:
Context: 'Hi, this is my first time camping and I want to make sure I have enough stuff.  I would like three food, three firewood, and two water.  What do you think?' 'I have been camping a few times and pretty much know what I need to be comfortable and healthy.  Warmth and hydration are important for me.  So, I am thinking 2 firewood, 2 water and 0 food.' 'Since I have never been camping before, why do you think you need 2 firewood?'
Utterance: 'Unfortunately, I have arthritis so being sure to keep warm and the dampness away in the evening, heat is important for me.'

Ex Output:

No