In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: threat and non-threat. Threat is a statement that someone will be hurt or harmed, especially if the person does not do something in particular.

Example Input: Comment: Meh, it's been the "look at me" league for a long time.  Got a Sharpie?  LOL  I think the problem with the game is the stoppage between play.  In a sport like Rugby, play happens immediately, so the guys don't have time to stop and show off.

Yeah, what Watson did was moronic.  But, that's been going on for awhile.
Example Output: Non-threat

Example Input: Comment: Sad that we even would have to file charges like this because of thieves.
Example Output: Non-threat

Example Input: Comment: I'll take this opportunity to comment on a similar "comments closed" story from a few days ago.

"Study finds ‘appalling’ death rate among young Indigenous drug users in B.C."  G&M Nov 6
Whose study? "Cedar Project Partnership of First Nations groups and researchers." 

Findings: 
In B.C. "Indigenous drug users ... are 13 times more likely to die compared with other Canadians of the same age..." "Other Canadians?" Silly comparison. Of course they are! most "other Canadians" don't abuse drugs. Try "compare deaths of "other drug users."

"It is possible that some of the overdoses observed were in fact suicides..."  If it is "possible" it is NOT a fact. Fact is, we'll likely never know. 

Conclusion: "The death rates among young Indigenous people who use drugs ... are appalling and must be viewed as a public health and human rights issue,"Human rights?  Why? If it is, the death rate for caucasians who OD might be seen as a human rights issue, too.

ANY death from O.D. is appalling.
Example Output:
Non-threat