We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gay Marriage) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gay marriage. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gay marriage.

- 'Humanitarian aid should take priority over someone who spends lots of time and money on animal rights.'
Invalid

Well, if we decide to make incest not taboo, we will have a different discussion, one that doesn't have a bearing on gay marriage or inter-racial marriage.
Valid

Lambda Legal, which represented Valentine argued that since same-sex couples are not legally permitted to marry in New York State the court should accept the domestic partner registry as equivalent to marriage.

Valid