In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

Ex Input:
Sentence: Bill passed the half-empty plate to John because he was full.
 Reason: The 'he' refers to bill because Bill wasn't hungry, so he gave the rest to John who was hungry. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

Ex Output:
Correct


Ex Input:
Sentence: Dan had to stop Bill from toying with the injured bird. He is very compassionate.
 Reason: The 'He' refers to dan because he is actually a 'he' in the first place, but he might be referring to his partner. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

Ex Output:
Wrong


Ex Input:
Sentence: I took the water bottle out of the backpack so that it would be handy.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the water bottle because of the 'it' meaning to you. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

Ex Output:

Wrong