In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence can be inferred from the statement. Incorrect choices change the meaning in important ways or have details that are not mentioned in the statement. Indicate your answer as 1,2, or 3 corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.

Input: Consider Input: Statement: 'And another thing,' she snapped. Choices:  1. She had snapped. 2. 'And another thing,' she said kindly. 3. She was so angry that she snapped.

Output: 1


Input: Consider Input: Statement: When you hear that despite the fact that he has economists who know better, the Justice Department's Joel Klein apparently either believes or chooses to claim that this case is about path dependence, you start to wonder. Choices:  1. Joel Klein is lying about the case, and it's obvious why. 2. Joel Klein's claim that the case is about path dependence is fully backed up by his economists. 3. Joel Klein says that this case is about path dependence, even though the economists who work for him know that isn't true.

Output: 3


Input: Consider Input: Statement: There were 110 sudden creaks of the furniture, imperceptible rustlings in the curtains. Choices:  1. No noises emitted from the furniture and curtains.  2. The furniture creaked, and the curtains rustled.  3. The furniture was old. 


Output: 2