TASK DEFINITION: In this task, you're given a statement, and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence clearly disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3' corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.
PROBLEM: Statement: It was applied pro bono by attorney Robert Hamrick at the Schwabe Williamson &amp Choices:  1. Attorney Robert Hamrick did not apply it pro bono. 2. Attorney Robert Hamrick was being charitable by doing it pro bono. 3. Attorney Robert Hamrick applied it pro bono.

SOLUTION: 1

PROBLEM: Statement: so you know plus less bags less waste Choices:  1. As well as less usage of bags that end up as waste, thereby reducing waste as well. 2. Producing fewer bags and waste was the intended result of the system. 3. You probably are aware that there will be many more bags and a ton more waste.

SOLUTION: 3

PROBLEM: Statement: The elevation of VA to cabinet-level status in 1989 spurred the department to make internal management improvements. Choices:  1. The department had to improve management in 1989.  2. The department made no changes whatsoever in 1989. 3. Higher expectations were implemented upon the VA. 

SOLUTION:
2