In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Ex Input:
Comment: Ridicule is not persecution. Ridicule is simply the the involuntary and unavoidable noises reasonable people make in response to indefensible bat shit crazy bullshit.

Ex Output:
Obscene


Ex Input:
Comment: Jones has no "style", just rant.

If Coulter modified her style, she'd be taken more seriously by what some would call Mainstream people presumably those giving "funnies" here--and with a good degree of validity. She makes some great observations about her country, its policies and people. Trouble is, she does it with a sledge-hammer.

Ex Output:
Non-obscene


Ex Input:
Comment: Ignorant and bigoted people who cannot accept China can equal and surpass Western technology always resort to the tired old mantra of "they stole it".  Just as in the sporting world, whenever a non-Western athlete defeats a Western athlete in a sport they're used to dominating, the tired and jealous refrain is "they cheated".

German engineers used to laugh at Japanese engineers - until Lexus started taking market share from Mercedes and BMWs.

Keep laughing - you will be left behind.

Ex Output:

Non-obscene