In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Example Input: Comment: And then what happens to the restaurants? Do we let Mexicans in to do that, too?
Example Output: Non-obscene

Example Input: Comment: At the moment he chose to pull the trigger, there was -- literally -- no threat, no possibility for "any degree of force" to be used against anyone. 

These aren't just facts - they're uncontradicted facts. The defense is just hoping the jury will ignore the facts by (a) convolution of the time frame so that earlier events are intermixed with later events, (b) pointing to facts unknown and unknowable to the defendant at the time, and (c) insisting that possibilities that are physically impossible could be possible.

That said, I'd be betting on juror nullification of the law in this case. 

But kudos to the prosecutor for not ignoring such a clear-cut, textbook case of cold blooded murder - in El Paso Cty nonetheless! (That fact alone should convince observers of how obvious a crime this was. Prosecuting a Green Beret for executing a scumbag! I'm certain the prosecutor looked for any alternative other than prosecution! Now that is dedication to the law - lady justice with a blindfold.)
Example Output: Non-obscene

Example Input: Comment: Re: "Trump seems like a loose cannon."

"SEEMS"???

Re: "Shouldn't he have advisors and the like to caution and restrain him before he goes off saying things that could cause negative repercussions?"

It isn't POSSIBLE to "restrain" him. He already does have myriad "advisors" to caution him - and he couldn't care less. He is reckless AND dangerous.

Re: "Especially some of his sweeping crazy assertions, like the one where he said Ford was planning to shut down in the States and move the jobs to Mexico."

If you weren't already well-aware, lying is his M.O. 

Re: "By saying erroneous things, he can hurt Ford shareholders"

Again, he does not CARE.

Re: "and if wrong and carelessly considered"

"IF"???

Re: "even he is subject to lawsuits."

He is currently the subject of some 3,500 lawsuits.

Re: "As the prospective president, he carries a burden of due diligence in his pronouncements."

Yes he does, but ... He. Does. Not, CARE.
Example Output:
Non-obscene