We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

Mine are rights, theirs are crimes and a man in the right is justified in using deadly force to protect his life and rights.
Valid

Gun rights were all very well and good when you needed Militia's to help defend against British aggression in the war for independence.
Valid

Also if both points are true, would you sacrifice you right to protect your rights with guns (rather than politically) for a crime rate low enough where you don't feel you need a gun for protection?

Valid