In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Ex Input:
Comment: According to third wave feminists like this, it's just not realistic to ask young women to not get blindingly drunk and to moderate their sex lives.

They are from a different planet indeed.

Ex Output:
Non-sexual-explicit


Ex Input:
Comment: While I agree with the basics of your thought (the Legislature failed us), to think the chief thief would not have vetoed the PFD is foolishness. That man wants our PFD, and nothing will stop him. The Legislature could have hacked the budget with a light saber, and Walker would have still capped our PFD.

Ex Output:
Non-sexual-explicit


Ex Input:
Comment: Ah, alternative facts! Real facts: the Mongols successfully invaded China, period. The wall was a huge success... for a limited time with certain invaders, in certain places. You do know this was thousands of  years ago, right? You do know that illegal immigration drastically fell during the Obama administration? 
The wall is a bogus issue to make the easily misled think something is being done to help their job situation. It isn't. Like NAFTA and other bogus issues, it won't bring back jobs simply because immigrants and foreign production isn't the issue here at home. Americans don't need jobs, they need good-paying jobs. Never in the history of the planet has that occurred without strong unions. Never. You probably doubt this, but if you'd do just a simple "google" search you'd find out. 
Unless you're a multi-millionaire, you may be a huge sucker.
Clinton and 40 billion: I'd love to see the link. Not that I don't trust you.........

Ex Output:

Non-sexual-explicit