instruction:
The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the no-need strategy, otherwise output No. no-need is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used when a participant points out that they do not need an item based on personal context such as suggesting that they have ample water to spare. no-need can directly benefit the opponent since it implies that the item is up for grabs.
question:
Context: 'Hello, what do you need the most for your camping trip?'
Utterance: 'ideally some firewood, it got soaked due to me being caught in the rain. what do you need the most?'
answer:
No


question:
Context: 'Yes. Hoping we can make a good deal.' 'Me too!  I'm hoping for two food items and one water.  I'm diabetic so if my blood sugar drops, I may need the extra carbs.  And water because water is important! 🙂 ' 'I prefer two water and one food. I can understand why you need the extra food items. I'm not much of a snacker but do drink a lot of water all the time. Keeps me from eating more!🙂'
Utterance: 'Lol, it seems it was easy for us to come to a deal!  I'm super bad at drinking water (trying to get better) so I don't feel I'll need as much.  Do you want all of the firewood or should I take one and you take two?  '
answer:
Yes


question:
Context: 'Hello, how are you doing today?' 'Hey there, I'm doing well! I'm excited to choose camping supplies.'
Utterance: 'Me too🙂. I packed a lot of food so I have plenty to spare'
answer:

Yes