We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Ex Input:
Sent1: I believe that people who have killed, raped, tortured, or have done any other extreme act of violence should get the death penalty.
 Sent2: However, as I know many disagree, I think there should be understandings for justifiable murders.

Ex Output:
Not similar


Ex Input:
Sent1: Most people would agree that someone who kills someone in self defense doesn't deserve the death penalty, but there have been a couple of recent cases where someone killed someone in revenge for molesting their children.
 Sent2: There has been so much cases of people who have been executed, only to be found innocent after their death.

Ex Output:
Not similar


Ex Input:
Sent1: Or you could merely ignore them and concede that the death penalty is flawed, kills innocent people and costs the lives of innocents in the use of how it is funded
 Sent2: Especially given that you have accepted that some innocent people are executed.

Ex Output:

Not similar