In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.
--------
Question: Comment: This topic must be expanded beyond "clergy sex abuse" to abuse of all kinds by clergy. There are priests who engage in patterns of verbal and emotional abuse which are just as damaging to the victims, and if the victims report the treatment, they are ridiculed, intimidated and manipulated to keep silent by those in authority over these abusers, who go merrily on their way, thinking, "As long as I'm not caught in bed with a woman, or a man, or looking at porn on a computer, nothing will happen." They behave like spoiled children, and those in authority enable and protect them.

Answer: Sexual-explicit


Question: Comment: Sounds like McComas had a few priors but the theft was the only prior that left a victim. He might have tried something stupid that angered the cop. Freedom of information absolutely should be available as soon as it is discovered, for anyone to study. I'm not saying the police are corrupt but they do protect each other. What I fear is the concept of "We have conducted a thorough internal investigation and find no wrong doing on the part of the officer"

Answer: Non-sexual-explicit


Question: Comment: Nothing wrong with hillary, with Mr. Trump beating her ass she is just looking for the sympathy vote.

Answer:
Sexual-explicit