In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Example Input: Comment: Denying that  a Creator actually created the universe  is akin to denying that anyone 'created'  a housing development or a piece of art. If I said the housing development just appeared out of nowhere you'd say I was crazy and you would be right. Yet the  belief that the entire universe had no designer, no builder and no intelligence behind it and it just  appeared is accepted, with a straight face,  as a fact. Just because we don't know how God did something  doesn't mean He didn't do it.  That kind of reasoning is absurd and not at all 'scientific'.
Example Output: Non-obscene

Example Input: Comment: Democratic counterpart has not presented him with a list of specific demands and “needs to come to the table and talk.” What if your counterpart said,"DON'T BUY THAT DAMN GLASS BUILDING. ARE YOU OUT OF YOUR RABBIT ASS MIND." What if he said that?
Example Output: Obscene

Example Input: Comment: And Russia propped up Assad after he used chemical weapons the first time around. Then Russia arranged for Russian/ Ukraine rebels to shot down a commercial airliner over the Ukraine whilst fanning the flames of separation. Neither side is innocent of atrocities but with the group portrait with Putin is only missing the crazy fat kid from North Korea.
Example Output:
Non-obscene