We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Q: Sent1: So should we be able to impose the sentence of life without parole, all the while understanding that we may have put an innocent man in prison for life?
 Sent2: As long as we sentence people to a life in prison we are also GUARANTEED to sentence an innocent person.

A: Similar
****
Q: Sent1: The majority populations of all countries may support the death penalty for some crimes (1).
 Sent2: Over 40 countries have abolished the death penalty for all crimes since 1990.

A: Similar
****
Q: Sent1: And no, society is not better served by life imprisonment than the death penalty because society then learns that consequences aren't very severe for committing an act of murder.
 Sent2: In the case of the death penalty, the crime committed is so terrible that society is no longer concerned with teaching a lesson; they simply want to be free of these terrible criminals.

A:
Not similar
****