In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.
--------
Question: Comment: The letter writer is incorrect. Trump does represent a certain kind of masculinity--the kind that can't get it's needs met through its own merits but gets its needs met through the crutch called male privilege. Trump types are so unattractive physically, emotionally and socially that they can't get their sexual needs met in the normal way--on the open market in an equal exchange. They require the black market of sexual harassment and rape. Trump types only get sex when they buy it or by forcing themselves on attractive women who always reject them because they are so grotesque. Let's face it. Real men get what they want by having something to offer. Money can only buy sex from people who prostitute themselves. These are the only women who would have sexual relations with a Trump or a Trump type. Trump will always be a john.

Answer: Non-identity-attack


Question: Comment: "No gentleman should ever do that, even if he is inebriated as well"
This is just one example of the kinds of comments one reads about such things 
So, what is wanted then is a double standard: 
SHE isn't responsible enough to give consent because she's drunk, but HE is still expected to be responsible .enough to be a gentleman EVEN when drunk.

THIS is the crux of the problem; Fuzzy logic, weighted automatically in the woman's favour, is what we get non-stop in article after article, and comment after comment - allowing her to claim no responsibility but insisting that the man must always be responsible no matter HOW drunk he is.

Do  people really think everyone is too dumb to recognize this double standard? Shame on those who use it, , and shame on those who go along with it!

Answer: Non-identity-attack


Question: Comment: Non whites, the poor, and women are not the new majority, not by a LONG ways.I think its illogical to add women to a racial list. Or are you saying white women DONT enjoy white privilege?  Poor white people?  Move to Canada, hugh

Answer:
Identity-attack