In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

Ex Input:
Comment: I bet a black cop called you a white trash felon, you would take offense

Ex Output:
Identity-attack


Ex Input:
Comment: I like the investing in education comment. However, I am not a CPA and I could easily pencil a dollar out 30 years and out profit your discussion points. You are not adding all the true costs of owning a home and the profits of a second job. Last but not least, liquid money and a monthly  rent payment are wayyy better than no payment and 400k tied up in drywall and 2 x 4's YOU can't spend.  Never fear however. Help is on the way! After your kids put you in that special rest home, they will quickly turn your wonderful home investment into snowmachines, cabins and fast cars.   Just saying .  .  .  It happens every day. Drinking Lots of milk is good for you . . .  right? Heck ya because the dairy industry says so.

Ex Output:
Non-identity-attack


Ex Input:
Comment: Rod one does not have to use specific words to meet the criteria of exhibiting tendencies. It is a childish argument to indicate he did not say a specific word when his intent wass clear to the audience. Over the campaign Donald made many statements indicating his views on other races, women and religions.  Should I start with the Trump comment about the Mexican judge overseeing his trial. Or maybe the all Mexicans who come here are rapist, thieves, and drug dealers.  Certainly his recorder statement about his grabbing women stands by itself as indicative of his views on women.  Did sure you missed all those?

Ex Output:

Identity-attack