Categorize the comment on the basis of severe toxicity. If the comment is severely toxic output Yes, otherwise output No.

Q: The issue is: "What's going on in the Mat Valley?"  None of what we have been seeing the past few years is any good. A double homicide, perhaps a triple homicide. Word is that the female was 5 and half months pregnant. Rip offs, burglaries, armed robbery, assaults and drug, drugs, drugs. This is just not good none of it is.

A: No
****
Q: The possible legal ramifications from Mr. Hammer's alleged actions have not been determined.  The evidence of those actions seems rather strong and acknowledging so is hardly a "personal attack."  The rifles were recoverd from a property owned and/or controlled by Mr. Hammer.  Just to clarify: a) rash verdict.......that's the responsibility of a judge or jury..to my knowledge, none has been reached b) accusations.....those were made first by the tenant, then by the legal authorities based on testimony from the tenant and evidence acquired via a Search Warrent and c) personal attack...I will gladly repeat that if Mr. Hammer is, indeed, guilty of the actions mentioned in this article,  it was really "stupid" for him to have taken the actions. If asked today, I'm guessing he would likely agree with me.

A: No
****
Q: Jason, you're jumping to a lot of conclusions and are accusing some very good, hardworking people of something that they would never, ever do.

A:
No
****