In this task, you are given books product reviews in English language. The goal is to classify the review as "POS" if the overall sentiment of the review is positive or as "NEG" if the overall sentiment of the review is negative.

misleading title . Despite what the book title "Grammatically Correct", this book is mostly about punctuation usages.  Grammar is limited to a thin, single chapter.  There are not sufficient materials on grammar to alert you on incorrect usages, let alone correct them.    I would recommend "Painless Grammar" over this title
NEG

Rush and Me . I used to be a good friend to Rush. I listened to his program all the time. When I first saw this book, I ignored it. Finally, after it had been in the window of our bookstore for several months, I picked it up and looked inside.    I was amazed!     However, I had to put it down because I thought it was too negative. It called Rush names. I did not need to have that. Finally, I tried getting it at the library, but they said they did not have a copy, because they said it was "too controversial."    So when the price came down, I bought a used copy for a couple of bucks, and read the whole thing.    I was amazed some more!    Rush used to have 20 million listeners to his talk show. He was a legendary, rich talk show host. This book tells you exactly how Rush became a rich, popular talk show host. And he is thinner now that he has recovered from his unfortunate drug problem. And you know, that sort of thing could happen to anybody.    But I had trusted Rush, and his VALUES, and I kind of felt he let me down. So for me, the title is not appropriate. Rush Limbaugh is a Big, Rich Talk Show Host who Cuts Corners on His Values would be a better title. Rush is no idiot, either.    Now, by some "coincidence" Al Franken is a talk show host too. And, I bet he learned how by studying how Rush did it!    If Franken can do it, YOU can do it!    Don't miss out on this GREAT opportunity!    Get a copy. Look how cheap it is now. Tell your friends
POS

If an irrational populist ran a non-profit agency . This book is neither about Aristotle nor General Motors.  Do not be fooled into believing it is in any way an application of Aristotelian ethics in modern business; it is not.  Morris consistently contradicts Aristotle throughout the book.      An example is Morris' proselytizing conclusion that leadership requires humility.  To make his point Morris quotes ancient Hasidic verse and the Tao Te Ching to establish that we are all worms.  Nobility, Morris suggests, is lowness.    Did Aristotle ever say this? No.  Could Aristotelian writing lead us to these conclusions?  No again.  Is Taoism consistent with Aristotelian reason and logic?  No, no, no.  Is Hasidic verse? Definitely not.  So what is going on?  Did Morris forget to read Aristotle?    Aristotle understood Man as a rational being with happiness as the moral purpose of his life.  Morris does not.  This book does not.    Morris peppers his book with quotes at the furious rate of no less than one or two per page.  He quotes every thing from fortune cookies to Einstein.  Ironically with all this mad quoting he never once, ever, (I checked) quotes Aristotle - never.       This book could better be titled, "If an irrational populist ran a non-profit organization."       The prefaces of basic economic texts usually contain better discussions of the practical intersection of business and philosophy.

NEG