We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Example Input: Sent1: There are some who need to be put to death.
 Sent2: The death penalty doesn't need to serve as a deterrent to crime.
Example Output: Not similar

Example Input: Sent1: The person who said that the death penalty should be used for people who are convicted of multiple-burglaries sounds like a complete knucklehead.
 Sent2: When someone mentions a criminal deterrence factor with death sentences, it sounds like a bad joke or total ignorance.
Example Output: Not similar

Example Input: Sent1: The death penalty is no more revnege than is any other sanction, meaning not at all.
 Sent2: And especially why would one do that if it means death penalty would become possible?
Example Output:
Not similar