TASK DEFINITION: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
PROBLEM: Isn't Ron Soto, guilty of the same thing that the homeless are being sanctioned for? He's sitting in a public place with a sign, so what makes it okay for him and not okay for a homeless person? There certainly are different standards applied. If it's a public place then why is it illegal to be there at all? If loitering is not allowed then how do they define loitering and how long does it take for sitting or standing, to become loitering?

It's just a fact that people need to have a place to sleep, some where in close proximity to support services. Designate an area for the homeless and make them stay there. The US is good at that sort of thing. The Indians were put on reservations and killed if they came outside! I wonder just how many of our homeless, served this country and got a kick in the butt for doing so?

SOLUTION: Yes

PROBLEM: The article says "crossing his property".  His stupid behavior presumably impacted other property owners.  I agree that money shouldn't be wasted on silly prosecutions, but this guy should get pounded for stopping the firefighters; especially if he added to the danger they were under.  Unfortunately, the charge was only a misdemeanor, and as such, probably wasn't worth the $$ or bother.

SOLUTION: Yes

PROBLEM: People need to read her letter, in full.   
If a person cannot form a full sentence, slurring words, or is unconscious, sex is never "consensual".   Can you go and sign any legal document under the influence?  No.  So the same goes with sex.
It is NOT ok to have sex with an unconscious person.  If you do think it is ok, then you are a sexual predator and the act is called predatory rape.

SOLUTION:
Yes