In this task, you must classify if a given review is positive/negative, indicating your answer as P or N.
--------
Question: renee zellweger stars as sonia , a young jewish wife and mother frustrated by the constraints of her hasidic community in brooklyn .
her husband ( glenn fitzgerald ) is a religious scholar whose all - in - a - day's - work attitude on sex fails to tame the " fire " she feels within , as so she confesses to the rebbe ( after hearing her fiery confession , the rebbe suddenly gets frisky with his pleasantly surprised wife -- and dies the next morning ) .
sensing her frustration , her husband 's brother ( christopher eccleston ) gives her a job in his jewelry brokering business in exchange for raw , passionless sex that just fans sonia 's still - burning flame .
on the job , sonia befriends ramon ( allen payne ) , a cool blast of hunky puerto rican water who does his own jewelry designs when not working as a grunt in an upscale jewelry store .
can fire - taming be far be that far behind for the ever - smoldering sonia ?
just about everything in writer - director boaz yakin 's rings false , starting with the improbably cast zellweger , who does an adequate enough acting job but simply looks too waspy for the role .
a better fit would have been julianna margulies , who outshines zellweger as sonia 's take - no - crap sister - in - law .
some of sonia 's baby steps toward liberation , such as indulging in a non - kosher egg roll in chinatown , come off as silly .
yakin attempts to spice up the proceedings with a touch of magical realism -- in the form of the recurring presence of sonia 's long - dead brother 's ghost -- make the story feel even more trite than it already is .
"
i did n't know what to expect .
it 's like something you chase for so long , but then you do n't know how to react when you get it .
i still do n't know how to react .
"
--michael
jordan , on winning his first nba championship in 1991 .
..
or , my thoughts after meeting him on november 21 , 1997

Answer: N


Question: the opening crawl tells us that the galaxy is in turmoil over the taxation of trade routes , and the greedy trade federation has used it 's armada of powerful space battleships to blockade the planet naboo .
we soon find that the federation plans to invade the planet with an enormous army of warrior robots and force naboo 's ruler , the young queen amidala ( natalie portman ) to sign a treaty giving the federation control .
however , the galactic republic has sent jedi knights qui - gon jinn ( liam neeson ) and obi - wan kenobi ( ewan mcgregor )
as emissaries to the federation in order to negotiate for the ending of the blockade .
no sooner do they arrive than the federation leaders are instructed via holographic transmission by a mysterious cloaked figure to destroy the jedi , and the first battle begins .
it seems that for me and thousands of people like me , the love for george lucas 's trilogy of star wars movies has only grown over time .
we 're the fans , not the freaks .
we wo n't go dressing up like darth vader ( although you have to admit those imperial uniforms are pretty darn cool ) , and we wo n't incorporate lines from the script in our everyday conversations ( not all the time , anyway ) , but if someone wants to challenge us to a little trivia contest , we 're throwing down .
all right , stop looking at me like that .
we have been faithfully and patiently waiting . waiting for this movie ever since the end credits of return of the jedi started to roll .
you see , the trilogy is not just a set of movies , but a religion of sorts to we , the faithful disciples , and the phantom menace is tantamount to the second coming of the messiah .
unfortunately , it is not our savior .
for weeks beforehand , i was going around telling people that this movie had better be damned good - stupendously good - miraculously good .
anything less
and it 'll be the biggest disappointment of the century .
i did n't want the doomsaying prophecy to come true , really i did n't , but this film nevertheless fails to reach the pinnacles of filmmaking .
character development is virtually nonexistent .
with the possible exception of qui - gon , most of the film 's characters seem left with nothing to do but go through the motions .
none seem very affected by their experiences , and few even show any passion at all .
contrast this with the horribly irritating comic relief we are nearly continuously subjected to in the form of jar jar binks , a creature belonging to a race which lives in underwater cities on naboo , in precarious symbiosis with the land dwellers led by amidala .
jar jar 's life is saved by qui - gon early in the film , and travels with our heroes for the sole reason of making us laugh ( or
supposedly so ) .
his speech mannerisms are so " cute - ified " that i could n't understand a third of what he was saying , and the slapstick he performed was just distracting .
his head gets caught in an electronic field , his foot gets caught in the stirrup of some large beast , he describes being in trouble as " deep doo doo , " and even manages to step in some of the same while walking around in mos eisley spaceport .
therein lies a key difference between this film and one of its predecessors .
in star wars , we had obi - wan telling us mos eisley was a " wretched hive of scum and villainy .
" in the phantom menace , we get doo doo .
the films of the trilogy took me away from my everyday life and immersed me in a story " a long time ago in a galaxy far , far away . . . .
"
this film , on the other hand , constantly reminds me that it 's only a movie by including situations and phrases that are so uniquely modern american that they seem incredibly out of place and serve to jerk the viewer from the experience .
perhaps the most blatant offense occurs during a scene where young anakin skywalker enters into a pod racing competition ( it 's kind of like chariot racing with large engines instead of horses ) , and there are a couple of commentators in a press box delivering indy 500-like play by play .
i liked the pod race ; it was really exciting and ratcheted the tension , but when the heck did lucas think up the idea of putting in the sportscasters ?
the race would have been even more exciting without the distraction .
this aspect , coupled with the emphasis on humor simply baffled me .
i suppose one may say that lucas was trying to appeal to the younger viewer , but would more intelligent scenes and dialog hurt this appeal at all ?
did n't millions of youngsters still go back to see the original star wars in 1977 over and over again ?
did n't the action figures still sell like hotcakes ?
of course they did , and it 's only poor judgment that allows the most - eagerly awaited film in history to be marred by pandering to children who would still have enjoyed a film with more appeal for adults .
one aspect that will appeal broadly , however , is the use of special effects .
the people at lucas 's industrial light and magic , the world 's premiere effects house , outdid themselves in providing seamless integration of computer - generated images and real - life footage .
some of the scenes have to be seen to be believed , especially the shots of a land battle between the federation 's robot army and jar jar 's countrymen .
the space battles are also impressive , although improved over past efforts by only subtle margins to the casual observer .
this , however , is a testament to the work which ilm produced two decades ago and still holds up well today .
john williams is back , of course , providing a score for the film as only he can .
his music is pervasive throughout , as rousing and as dramatic as ever , always serving to punctuate scenes noticeably and appropriately .
since this film is supposed to be the first installment in a nine - episode story ( star wars , the empire strikes back and return of the jedi being episodes four , five and six , respectively ) , the phantom menace has the daunting task of setting up the origins of several characters we know already , in addition to those with whom we unfamiliar .
as a result , attention to history and characterization was spread a little thin .
it would have been nice to get more in depth with yoda and obi - wan , for example , but given the fact that there were several new characters to cover , it is understandable that some of the development has been left for the next two films .
one of the new characters is darth maul , hailed as the new villain with as much hype as marketing forces could muster prior to this film 's release .
in spite of the hype , darth maul is a character which almost did n't have to be in the film , his role is so insignificant .
he has maybe three spoken lines ( believe it or not , a second actor voices the character ) and the rest of the time just scowls and looks mean .
with that working against him , he never has a chance at being interesting and instead ends up an utter disappointment .
lucas seems to have wanted to develop the spiritual nature of the star wars universe , something which has been prominent throughout .
however , he does so largely by paralleling the star wars spirituality with the bible , offering an easy out for story - writing and once again bringing the viewer back to planet earth with a real - life connection .
oddly , while trying to capitalize on spirituality , lucas at the same time introduces the fact that mastery of the force is dependent upon having little force - loving parasites in your body 's cells .
this only serves to de - mystify the workings of the force a few notches by offering a scientific connection .
do n't let me mislead you too far .
the phantom menace , by most standards , is a good film .
it contains a lot of visual treats , sets the stage for an epic story , gives us a bit of excitement here and there , and even allows us to revisit some of our old friends .
it 's just that when held up to it 's predecessors ( and to not do so would be unrealistic ) , this film simply pales .

Answer: P


Question: it was with great anticipation that i sat down to view braveheart last week as it premiered on american cable .
the academy award winning film had been highly acclaimed .
it also featured the music of one of my favorite film composers , james horner .
what i was in for was a disappointing and overlong film which was anything but the best picture of 1995 .
what drags braveheart down is its screenplay .
it abounds with high production values : john toll 's award - winning cinematography ( which also graced edward zwick 's 1994 legends of the fall ) , a gorgeous score by horner , and the sort of logistics that make you wish assistant directors were household names .
but this does not save a misguided script .
the film wishes to paint its central character as a hero , but the viewer 's only response to his " heroism " is intellectual : william wallace ( producer - director mel gibson ) is fighting for freedom and against tyranny , so we have to root for him .
but wallace 's actions paint a different story .
he speaks of freedom and acts of vengeance .
though one intellectually realizes wallace is on the right side , the film paints an unconvincing emotional portait , in which wallace is just not as bad as the english king .
wallace speaks of freedom , but his acts point toward vengeance .
after kicking the english out of scotland , he decides to invade england .
this is evident of a " spartacus complex " , and this example applies both historically and cinematically .
the historical spartacus at one point moved from liberating slaves to sacking roman cities ; the film spartacus , like braveheart , has high production values and competent performaces and is dragged down by an awful screenplay .
it is a shame that such an excellent score is part of such a terrible film .
horner 's score tries to make emotional connection , but the performances and the script do not help .
gibson portrays wallace in such a way that the audience can not relate to him or identify with him .
this drags down any emotional connection to the film 's plot , and turns three hours into a total waste of time .

Answer:
N