instruction:
Given a document, generate a short title of the document. The title should convey the main idea/event/topic about which the document is being written. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].
question:
"I have to be better than everyone , I have to work harder ," Hillary Clinton said recently in an interview printed in the New York Times on November 16 . 
Oh , Hillary -- please . 
Whether his heir or his victim , Hillary Clinton won her Senate seat because of Bill Clinton , and for no other reason at all . 
Bill was the man whose connections and money made it possible for Hillary to enter the presidential races as the prohibitive favorite in 2008 and 2016 , though she would go on to lose both of them ; Bill who cleared the field so effectively in 2016 through pressure and threats -LRB- and campaigning against prior defectors in intervening elections -RRB- that only a 74-year-old socialist was willing to challenge her . 
That she struggled to put even him away is not a case of Hillary being "better" than others or her being a weak candidate who needed a man to protect her -- whatever she or her fan base may say .
answer:
Hillary Clinton the disadvantaged . 


question:
"Petrocaribe will be strengthened -- independent of the international situation  independent of the price of oil " Venezuela President Hugo Chavez said as he arrived Friday in St. Kitts.
 His country's state Bolivarian News Agency said Petrocaribe leaders meet "with the expectation of its expansion  as well as new programs of cooperation and attention to a world increasingly thirsty for fuel."
 During the meeting  Chavez called the pact a geopolitical and social "offensive for unity " and said Venezuela is open to accepting other nations. "If some countries want to join  the doors are open " he said.
 The plan promotes Chavez's vision of regional independence from the United States  and the lure of cheap oil has drawn countries friendly to Washington as well as his leftist allies.
answer:
Cuba ' s energy woes in focus at oil partners


question:
But Americans' concerns about the technological capabilities of their own nation relative to those of the USSR didn't fully bloom until two months later  after the Soviets had launched a dog to space and the United States' first attempt to loft a satellite had failed spectacularly  said  former NASA Chief Historian Roger Launius . [Sputnik 1! 7 Fun Facts About Humanity's First Satellite]
"The way I tend to phrase it is  you get three strikes  and you're out "  Launius  told Space.com.
The launch of the beach-ball-size Sputnik 1 did not come as a shock to American national-security officials  who had expected something big was in the works. But it did catch  the public off-guard  Launius  said.
"The media at the time asked him a couple of questions about Sputnik  and then they moved on to other things "  Launius  said. "The big story of the day was the Little Rock crisis — are you going to bring in federal troops to desegregate the Little Rock [Arkansas] school system?"
But the mood shifted noticeably on Nov. 3  1957  when the USSR successfully launched Sputnik 2 to orbit   Launius  said.
"It certainly salved the open wound; there's no doubt about that "  Launius  said of Explorer 1  which famously discovered the Van Allen radiation belts surrounding Earth.
But this success didn't erase all memories of the wound. Over time  the three-tiered Sputnik moment spurred the U.S. government to ramp up the nation's technological capabilities   Launius  said.
answer:

Sputnik moments: Trio of spaceflight events shook US in 1957