instruction:
Given a document, an entity and its sentiment towards the entity, verify if it is the correct sentiment towards the entity. Answer should be yes or no. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].
question:
Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Luke Cage is Neutral . Netflix just published the new âDefendersâ series  the culmination of several years of work by Marvel Television to get Marvel into prestige serial storytelling. (We have to find a new word for this: we canât call it âTVâ much longer.) The Marvel-Netflix deal now includes two seasons of âDaredevil â and one each of âJessica Jones â âLuke Cage â and âIron Fist.â Thatâs 65 episodes  plus the new eight-episode âDefenders â around 50 minutes each. Thatâs more than 60 hours on screen in the last two years.
Now  you can blame whatâs wrong with âThe Defendersâ on the Marvel shtick: America has no enemies but its own divisions. The heroes inevitably fight each other. That could work if you had writers who understood Americaâs divisions  but itâs disastrous when all youâve got is pettiness and liberal identity politics. âThe Defendersâ does better than any Marvel movie to give you thrilling fights  however. At least Daredevil does;  Luke Cage  is also pretty good; the other two were deficient to begin with and apparently not getting better.
There is a deep argument hidden somewhere in this mess of a story. But to see it develop  the viewer has to ask himself: why is Daredevil so scared of his own heroism  which might lead him to kill people? Heâs a Catholic  of course. And weâre reminded of that in an important scene in a confessional. But whatâs the import of that fact? Why is  Luke Cage  telling a grieving mother  he  learned about the power of prayer from  his  own father?  He âs an heir to MLKâs sacrifice and hope  as we know from  his  own show  but why does that matter here? The evil guys  too: why is their quest for immortality so evil or wrong? We all want to live as long as possible  anyway!
Instead  we get this mess of American social pathologies of individualism and evil ninjas. This is worthless for articulating the fight between two worlds  one dedicated to equality  the other inequality. Maybe future stories will get better. A friend pointed out that thereâs a lot of Christianity in the first season of âLuke Cage â and the second season is supposed to be more serious about civil rights. He also pointed out another sign of hope: civil rights are connected with the Second Amendment.
In my previous essay  I said high-flying civil rights rhetoric collapses in âLuke Cage.â Behold: in an emotional moment mid-season  Luke Cage tells a young black man-turned-criminal about Crispus Attucksâthe first man killed in the Boston Massacre of 1770  and thus  the first martyr of the American Revolution. He was black. We see his legacy exploited by a gangster and a politician  who abuse Harlem while pretending to save it. Unlike Attucks  they always put themselves first  because when they were poor  weak  and needed protection  nobody put them first.
 Luke Cage  takes a shot to the head from that stupid  scared young criminalâbut it makes no dramatic sense  with a literally bulletproof hero.  Luke Cage  is no Crispus Attucks. Our stories fake sacrifice  and thus betray our deepest awareness of our neediness. Thatâs because of our politics and our fear of death.
answer:
yes


question:
Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Christopher Johnson is Positive . Jets Chairman and CEO  Christopher Johnson  navigated through the cacophony and made the smart decision not to institute a playoff mandate next season for Mike Maccagnan and Todd Bowles. Such an ultimatum during this critical juncture of the organizationâs rebuild would only serve to undermine the ultimate goal. It would be reckless and counterproductive. It would threaten to screw everything up.
âItâs always going to be about progress â  Johnson  said this week about how  he âll evaluate the 2018 season. âWe canât get there fast enough. I want to get to the playoffs. I want to get to the Super Bowl. I was serious about that desire to get to the Super Bowl before my brother gets back here. I would love to have that happen. But  there are no mandates. I think the fans are going to be happy with the way we move forward here. I just canât put down a mandate for these guys.â
 Johnson   you see  is smart.  He  knows that setting a postseason-or-else directive is counterproductive. Nothing good  frankly  can come from it.
 Christopher Johnson  made the right decision not to mandate a return to the playoffs in 2018. (Al Bello/Getty Images)
answer:
yes


question:
Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Rauner is Neutral . Gov. Bruce Rauner  on Monday vetoed a bill that was designed to clear the way for a major overhaul of how the state distributes dollars to public schools  saying issues remain that would prevent about three dozen private schools from participating in a new scholarship program.
 Rauner  used  his  amendatory veto powers to rewrite the measure  which sponsors said was requested by the Illinois State Board of Education so officials could move forward on a new school funding formula that would prioritize poor and needy schools.
While  Rauner  has listed the new funding formula as one of his top achievements as he seeks re-election  the Republican governor said Monday that lawmakers failed to address a technicality that would prevent at least 36 Catholic and independent schools from benefiting from a new scholarship program heâs pushed.
âInclusivity was the spirit of this legislation to begin with  and we simply must ensure that we follow through with the appropriate language to get the job done â  Rauner  said in a statement.
However  supporters of the funding formula rewrite say Raunerâs veto could mean struggling schools left waiting on an influx of state dollars will have to wait even longer as legislators weigh the governorâs changes. Lawmakers can vote to accept the changes  reject them with an override  or choose not to take them up at all  in which case the legislation would die.
âNot a single penny of the new money has been spent on school districts to date â said Sen. Andy Manar  a Democrat from Bunker Hill in central Illinois who sponsored the funding changes. âBecause of this veto  they are going to continue to wait for the very thing  Bruce Rauner  is taking credit for on television â equitable school funding.â
 Rauner  spokeswoman Rachel Bold said  it  was âunfairâ for critics to say the amendatory veto would delay implementation of the new funding formula  saying the board of eduction âcontinues to work on the new funding formulaâ and money is âstill several months from being sent out.â
An education board spokeswoman declined to comment  saying  the agency  is âevaluating the impactâ of the governorâs proposed changes.
 Raunerâs  issue centers on language that would require nonpublic schools to be ârecognizedâ by the board of education to participate in the tax program.  He  says that eligibility should be expanded to schools that are âregisteredâ with the board.
Though  Rauner  eventually embraced the new school funding formula last summer   he  initially vetoed the proposal  saying  it  amounted to a âbailoutâ for Chicago Public Schools. While CPS still got a major cash infusion with  Raunerâs  signature on the funding rewrite  the governor also claimed a win with the tax credit program  which he said would give families more choices in picking schools.
Lt. Gov. Sanguinetti sticks with  Gov. Rauner  despite disagreements Â»
 Rauner  spends night in Quincy veterans home plagued by deadly water problems Â»
 Rauner  lays out how second term will be different  blames Emanuel for first-term failures Â»
answer:

yes