Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.

Input: Consider Input: Unions are one of the largest lobbing groups in the US.  Now they say campaign contribution are not ok.  These guys are as dirty as they come.

Output: Yes


Input: Consider Input: If you go here - http://raineugene.org/contact/  you can find my email.  Email me and I will send you contact information to the people involved in the projects that I have knowledge of (Innovation Hun and Fiber Project) so that you can get more detailed information on them.  I will also do my best to connect you to others that are working on plans for the others projects (Farmers Market and Park Blocks) to see what those are and get more detailed descriptions. 

On the larger discussion of robbing Perter to pay Paul, my opinion is that we are not, but that is a much longer conversation that would be difficult to have and is getting a little muddy in this thread.  There are several issues getting conflated that I think need to be separated (is the government trustworthy and are these projects worth doing).  I can talk to the latter, but would rather not debate the former.  I get it is an issue, it is just not one that I have a strong opinion about.

Output: No


Input: Consider Input: The country was ready for a black man to be president 7 years ago but made a terrible mistake picking Obama.. there were several black men out there who could have been great presidents but Obama was not one of them and his terms of distruction are almost at an end.  The Nation it is ready for a female as well but not Mrs. Clinton....the women is clearly a very evil person and  would destroy everything Obama has left standing...The Nation needs leadership and she has nothing but more division to offer....


Output: No