We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Input: Consider Input: Sent1: Gun haters are the extremist hate group demanding to ban the right to bear arms!
 Sent2: Simple if gun haters want people defending the right to bear arms to be in militias, why would you want the militias to have lesser weapons then the enemies they are defending against?

Output: Not similar


Input: Consider Input: Sent1: For every one crime gun that California exports, we get more than two crime guns imported back into our state."
 Sent2: We must be doing something right because our violent crime rates are dropping while your native country keeps rising in spite of gun and knife bans.

Output: Not similar


Input: Consider Input: Sent1: This appeared to me to be an argument that self defense cannot exist if a gun is used.
 Sent2: Like I said before, claiming that semi-automatic rifles get a lower level of constitutional protection than handguns because they are less useful for self defense seems absurd from historical point of view.


Output: Not similar