In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: insult and non-insult. Insult is any lanugage or act that is disrespectful or scornfully abusive.

Comment: You both are SICK FUCKS AND SHOULD ROT IN HELL.I HOPE YOU GUYS FEEL THE RAPE WRATH WHILE YOU TWO ARE IN PRISON AND IM SURE SOMEONE WILL VIOLATE YOU AS YOU TWO DID AGAINST INNOCENT CHILDREN .AND THE MAN IN THIS CASE SHOULD HAVE HIS PENUS AND BALLS REMOVED AND HIS HANDS CUT OFF AND HIS TONGE REMOVED AND FOR THE LADY ACTUALLY I CANT EVEN CALL THEM MAN / WOMEN YOU TWO ARE A WASTE OF HUMAN FLESH DISCUSTING .
Insult

Comment: The primary definition of a “weapon” is: “a thing designed or used for inflicting bodily harm or physical damage.”
A "lash" is the flexible part of a whip. A whip is primarily used to cause pain as punishment or as a stimulus to action. I suspect that Jesus wasn't intent on inflicting bodily harm on the moneychangers, and upsetting the tables may have scattered "the merchandise," but there was no physical damage.
Jesus "took the lash" to "stimulate" an examination of conscience: "It is written: 'My house shall be a house of prayer,' but you are making it a den of thieves.'" (Mt. 21:13)
Again, the one time a weapon -- a sword not a whip -- was wielded in Jesus’ presence, he clearly demanded, “Stop, no more of this!” (Lk.21:51)
Jesus "took the lash" once and then laid it down. He said, "I have given you a model to follow." We have taken and continue taking up arms to inflict bodily pain and physical damage. When will we follow Jesus example and lay down all weapons?
Non-insult

Comment: "Denver needs better mobility so that people don’t leave the city faster than they came..."

Then stop taking away car lanes for bike lanes that see 1/1,000th of the human traffic volume. Growing up on the east coast where congestion/density is the norm, watching the missteps of Denver's travel infrastructure over the last 20 years has been infuriating. And the fact that the City traffic planners/engineers still don't comprehend the concept of a "thoroughfare" is absolutely mind boggling. [yes - that's right - making side streets wait 4 minutes for a mass volume of traffic to pass can be the necessary/more-efficient approach]

It's 2017 - there are plenty of example cities to draw from to solve our mobility woes - get it together, Denver. You've spent billions on I-25 expansion, light rail lines, heavy rail lines, bike lanes, pedestrian paths, busses, etc. and you have nothing to show for it. It's pathetic and embarrassing. You all (city planners) should be ashamed of yourselves.

Non-insult