In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: threat and non-threat. Threat is a statement that someone will be hurt or harmed, especially if the person does not do something in particular.

Example Input: Comment: Not sure what's more bizarre here.... the total lack of any information in the story, how hard all the commenters jump to conclusions or the story itself. There is not a mention of alcohol in the story yet many comments believe it was the root cause of the incedent and all alcohol should be banned.  No mention of the guy's race or ethnicity but we had a large number of racial comments.  Somehow even Donald Trump got drawn into this story?????  The one eye witness reported in the story said he didn't even see the guy do anything out of the ordinary!!!  ADN needs to actually do some investigative journalism once in a while and you people need to quit jumping to conclusions without facts!!!!!
Example Output: Non-threat

Example Input: Comment: I'm not the least bit impressed by his fake surprise, and I'm not the least bit interested in hearing his self-serving explanations.  I doubt his parish priest would believe him, and for sure his God won't.
Example Output: Non-threat

Example Input: Comment: Gosh, what kind of establishment was it that protected the purveyors (criminals) of one the biggest ongoing crimes against humanity? Not to mention blatantly lying and hoodwinking their own nation into compliance with their crime. 

That Cheney and his puppet president aren't shackled and in orange jump suits, and Cal's choice to ignore their crime, clearly shows that Cal is just another columnist showing his preferential bias towards the term "establishment."
Example Output:
Non-threat