The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.
--------
Question: Context: 'no that won't work.  I will give you 3 food and 1 water.  I will take 3 wood and 2 waters.' 'I did not know you wanted water. Ok, that's great so I will take all 3 extra packages of food.As for the water I would like 2 waters because my dog is coming along with us for our trip and extra water for him will be needed.' 'i think i should have 2 waters because i will need to put the fire out to protect the forest.'
Utterance: 'Well, if we can't settle on an agreement i'm going to walk away. We agreed I will get all 3 extra packages of the food but I still wish for the 2 extra wood and 2 extra waters'

Answer: No


Question: Context: 'My favorite thing to do around the campfire is to sing songs.  I also like to do extra hiking as well.  I especially need firewood. ' 'Well, I could see fit to give you the extra firewood (If I can hear a few of your songs!) if you don't mind letting me take the water.' 'Hahaha, once you hear my singing you might hope the opposite.  I can do that with the firewood and water, but I really would prefer two of the remaining foods. '
Utterance: 'I could also use the extra food, so can we resolve it amicably?  Coin flip maybe?'

Answer: No


Question: Context: 'Not quite fine over here' 'oh what’s wrong sorryto hear that' 'It is very cold out here and i need a lot of firewood packages'
Utterance: 'I understand I have an always hungry toddler'

Answer:
Yes