Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.

[EX Q]: What's the matter Kylie?  Are women's opinion's a threat to your ilk?  Bet you're a supporter of the Un-Americans for Disparity and the Alaska Policy Forum who's trying to gut Alaska's public school system.  I'll be women have bigger jewels than you.  Right?
[EX A]: No

[EX Q]: All ivory trade should be banned

2015 25 walruses found dead near Cape Lisburne. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service determined the laughter was human caused. 1992 – A two year federal undercover operation interrupted one of the biggest wildlife slaughters in modern Alaska history; a grisly massacre of protected walruses providing ivory for the tourist trade. 2007 - Commentary by Paul Watson Founder and President of Sea Shepherd Conservation Society: Headless walrus are washing up on Alaskan beaches and narwhals are being pumped full of lead. Arctic wildlife is under assault in the quest for ivory and few dare question the losses for fear of being labeled racist. Additional stories, www.adn.com, search “ivory”. Alaska ivory poaching is on a par with African elephant ivory poaching.
[EX A]: Yes

[EX Q]: What? The PFD is income. Unearned income, granted, but still income. So let's do some math.  Family A. 4 people. 30k earned income, 6k (modest average) PFD unearned income. Taxing the PFD, and that is what it is. (Webster defines taxes as a compulsory contribution to state revenue) 2k or a 5.5% income tax. Family B. 4 people. 100k earned income, 6k pfd. Same 2k pfd tax 1.8% income tax. The pfd TAX targets those that have the least. "Whatever you do unto the least of these, you do unto me."
[EX A]:
No