In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Example Input: Comment: Being registered in multiple states is one thing. Actually voting in the same election more than once is a much bigger issue. 

You should really try a little harder. Comparing anyone to Hitler is a weak attempt to win an arguement. If you really think President Trump is comparable to one of the biggest killers in history you should do a little self reflection.
Example Output: Non-obscene

Example Input: Comment: Sue his ass amen! The PERMANENT fund dividend is based off a system that replenishes its self every year. If we don't have as good of a year then the PFD would be less. Based off a 5 year average. He wants to cut the money that we would be putting back into the economy to bail out the states fuck ups. How about the state pay for there own mistakes and stop with all the dump road projects like upgrading our high way to 6-8 lanes. We don't need that. Slow down take your time or drive a different rout. Or all the money there wasting on bridges to no where. Or there own salaries. Don't cut the PFD.
Example Output: Obscene

Example Input: Comment: " The world expects better from the 6000 year old civilization"

Don't worry, Chinese will soon start to perform freedom of navigation near California. Hope you don't cry mama when it happens.
Example Output:
Non-obscene