In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

Input: Consider Input: Sentence: Bob paid for Charlie's college education, but now Charlie acts as though it never happened. He is very ungrateful.
 Reason: The 'He' refers to charlie because Charlie is the one who acts like it never happened. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

Output: Correct


Input: Consider Input: Sentence: Beth didn't get angry with Sally, who had cut her off, because she stopped and counted to ten.
 Reason: The 'she' refers to beth because it is Beth who is the one who has been the subject of jealousy. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

Output: Wrong


Input: Consider Input: Sentence: I took the water bottle out of the backpack so that it would be lighter.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the backpack because Taking the water bottle out would make it more handy as oppose to having no effect on the handiness of the backpack. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 


Output: Correct