In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: threat and non-threat. Threat is a statement that someone will be hurt or harmed, especially if the person does not do something in particular.

Comment: How is she spending money like a drunken sailor?  What's DIA's debt to income ratio?

Why would there be numbers for a new concourse that won't be built for another 15 years?

You're presuming that they're presuming?  

Do you really think they haven't done a basic analysis of fuel costs?  If so, based on what?  Airlines buy their fuel years in advance.
Non-threat

Comment: I am all for your proposal to let people invest their SS. However, if they go broke, I don't want to save them. Let them die in the street. Right? And none of that socialized emergency care. Lock the doors if they don't have money. I mean, anyone who misjudges investments deserves to die, right?
Threat

Comment: You are spouting inaccurate statements, Leroy.  The permit they speak of has nothing to do with the McNeil Bay issue, it's a Corps permit, not a permit to operate.  And there were no dock structures in McNeil.  If you build a road and someone blocks the road, would you have a beef?  Yes, you would.  This dock could block the channel.  This is a public access issue as well as other issues.  You might want to do a little more research before you embarrass yourself further.  And you misspelled Kachemak.  Nice.

Non-threat