We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Q: Sent1: I don't feel as strongly about the death penalty as I feel about the abortion rights debate since I can relate to the desire for vengeance that people feel.
 Sent2: Well I, as creator of this debate, think that there should not be a death penalty.

A: Not similar
****
Q: Sent1: If these bleak prospects aren't enough to deter someone from committing a serious crime, what will ramping it up to the death penalty do?
 Sent2: Death penalty are given to those who have comitted a very serious crime.

A: Not similar
****
Q: Sent1: Killing a person for them killing someone else ( I understand this is not necessarily the criteria for receiving the death penalty) makes you no better than the executed.
 Sent2: I don't believe that they should because if you kill someone, they won't have the chance to either get rehabilitated nor will they have the chance to actually regret what they have done.

A:
Not similar
****