We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

[EX Q]: Sent1: We need to halt the death penalty before anyone else gets unjustly sentenced, then fix the problems (if that is even possible), and then, when we have safeguards in place, reinstitute it.
 Sent2: What we need are harsher sentences including the death penalty.
[EX A]: Not similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: if someone commits any crime, then they are a criminal by definition and should die.
 Sent2: So, when someone gets the death penalty, they chose their own fate by committing the crime.
[EX A]: Not similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: what you are saying is that we should murder people because the prisons are overcrowded.
 Sent2: Hitler killed a whole race, you are basically saying you don't mind if we kill a bunch of innocent people as long as we get guilty people as well.
[EX A]:
Not similar