We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

Ex Input:
Had James Holmes not been able to acquire this magazine his rifle would not have been disabled and he would have been free to change out empty magazines as often as he pleased.

Ex Output:
Valid


Ex Input:
You would rather be confronted by a guy with a baseball bat because you are FAR more likely to get killed by the guy with the gun.

Ex Output:
Valid


Ex Input:
Their argument is hardly valid, they want to stop the selling of firearms to people because they think it will decrease the crimes and school shootings along with other dangers that are caused by guns.

Ex Output:

Valid