Categorize the comment on the basis of toxicity. If the comment is toxic (harmful, malicious, derogatory, threat, insult, identity attck, etc.) output Yes, otherwise output No.

Input: Consider Input: Will the panel discussion be streamed?  If so, I need to replenish my beer and popcorn supply.

Output: No


Input: Consider Input: It was more than that Paul.  Vinis repeatedly attacked Clark's record.   And he did not offer any vigorous defense.   Nor did he go on the offensive and attack any of the numerous vulnerabilities that Vinis had.   Apparently he thought he could win this election being a gentleman, and refraining from criticizing Vinis.

However, elections don't work that way.   Attack campaigns do work!   That is why politicians use them so much.

Output: No


Input: Consider Input: I pay bills online and I sext, so I don’t feel threatened by the mail thieves. My mailbox locks anyway. Regardless, my point is that vote-by-mail is a scam vulnerable to fraud and theft. The thieves who were stealing in March probably didn’t want ballots, but I wouldn’t put it past them to be that dumb.


Output: Yes