We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.
--------
Question: Sent1: The death penalty is not used for what it is supposed to be used for.
 Sent2: I think the death penalty should only be used in extreme cases where the accused is, without a doubt, guilty.

Answer: Not similar


Question: Sent1: I assume in what follows that we, the country or the state, execute only for the crime of murder, though many capital punishment adherents would use it for other crimes, such as child rape, treason, arson, robbery and even fraud.
 Sent2: That should be a crime which should result in the death penalty.

Answer: Not similar


Question: Sent1: My mind will not change, when a person is found guilty and given the death penalty it should be carried out promptly, like within six months.
 Sent2: If a jury finds a person guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and the death penalty is issued, it should be carried out promptly!

Answer:
Similar