In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.
--------
Question: Comment: This Hitler argument is stale...arming people with military style weapons not only supports the crazy, it reflects our inability to understand why the vast majority of police favor the reasonable regulation of firearms ownership. They would also like to see regulation ammunition that's relates to the ability to kill them regulated. None of this minimal regulation would limit your freedoms...Canada has resonance gun regulations, Australia bans a number of styles of weaponry...they they both seem okay. The difference? Fewer gun deaths, fewer crazies with arms, and a clearer commitment to community safety. It's your children, our police, the neighbor down the street that desires reasonable consideration.

Answer: Non-identity-attack


Question: Comment: " Much of the violence in Charlottesville was black on white (or representatives thereof). No sentence enhancement there."

<citation needed>

So far, I've only seen white dudes kill at the charlotte rally, or get charged with crimes. There was the crying nazi, pretty sure he wasn't black.

Answer: Identity-attack


Question: Comment: Don't forget the Chinese and the Japanese who were mistreated by White Americans and how they continue to suffe...oh, wait....

Answer:
Identity-attack