We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

[Q]: Sent1: If it is as serious as torture or murder... Yes we should.
 Sent2: So we kill killers, but in the end, end up with more murders.
[A]: Not similar


[Q]: Sent1: Once the danger is gone killing a person is simply murder.
 Sent2: This process is needed in order to ensure that innocent men and woman are not executed for crimes they did not commit, and even with these protections the risk of executing an innocent person can not be completely eliminated.
[A]: Not similar


[Q]: Sent1: If somebody is completely innocent and they are executed for a crime they didn't commit (which, with forensics these days, probably will never happen again), that is a problem.
 Sent2: So as long as only some innocent people are killed for crimes they didn't commit then the system must be sound.
[A]:
Similar