In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

[EX Q]: Comment: Don't confuse the STEM and economics ignorant voters with reality ! The electrical energy equivalent of our fossil fuel BTUs is mind boggling !!
[EX A]: Non-identity-attack

[EX Q]: Comment: To say "evangelicals are stupid" is no different from saying "Catholics (or put in any other religious group) are stupid."
[EX A]: Identity-attack

[EX Q]: Comment: Well, perhaps you should ask the Canadian public if they want people who swear allegiance  to Allah over Canada in senior intelligence positions.  Sounds sensible to me.  Also, I just don't understand how you can be so hypocritical by constantly pointing out how racist Canada is while Muslim countries are the most oppressive human rights abusers on the planet.  I've lived and travelled there, and everything is racialized, women are hidden away, there's no religious or intellectual diversity allowed.  I don't like harassment at CSIS, but wouldn't it make sense to call out the far, far, far worse abuses in your culture and religion?  Or just live in a Muslim country if you think we're all so deplorable?
[EX A]:
Identity-attack