In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.
--------
Question: Comment: Essentially he was a no show, if compared to how other presidents had participated. And I believe that at one of the prayer breakfasts he insulted Christians, did he not?  Can you do better than that example?  Something in the Denver Post, for example.

Answer: Non-obscene


Question: Comment: If these pipelines are successfully blocked we could be seeing the beginning of the  end for confederation as we know it.  It is not as if those against pipelines are actually acting as if they are concerned about the environment. They still want al the advantages  of oil. The store shelves would be empty without oil.  Then there are those that go home and heat their homes and cook using the dirtiest fuel  called wood and or biomass.  ( it should be BioMESS)

Answer: Non-obscene


Question: Comment: Thank you. So many similarities with the Kealoha case regarding the fraudulent trust agreement and forged documents, and the involvement of the local Police. KPD provided the fake trust to my family to make it look legit. Obviously this is common practice due to the number of families who have reached out to us. After reading the indictment even I was shocked at the level of corruption. Hopefully the Kealoha's have unknowingly opened the door for others to get justice.

Answer:
Non-obscene