In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: threat and non-threat. Threat is a statement that someone will be hurt or harmed, especially if the person does not do something in particular.

Q: Comment: More personal attacks. A sure sign you're losing the argument. Your excuses are pathetic.

A: Non-threat
****
Q: Comment: Bet the ranch that HAL, et al will devise extra fees for asinine and mediocre items like persons weighing over the "average weight"; fees for not greeting flight attendants with a smile, needing assistance with placing bags into overhead compartments, etc., etc.

A: Non-threat
****
Q: Comment: I very much disagree with your assertions that tRump and his supporters embrace the ideals of America.   I, liberal lefty, embrace tolerance, the idea of America as the place of opportunity - including migrants, morality (tRump clearly defies any moral teaching and his supporters support that), education, science, creativity, responsibility to take of care our own and responsibility to the rest of the world etc etc etc- NONE of which tRump or his supporters embrace.  Your tRump America is one of hate and division and blaming the other - making America hate and trying to make America white - not making America great. So, do not tell me I am wrong because I am not. The divisiveness is spewed from tRump, his supporters and the GOP and has been since Newt in the 1990s.  Personally, I thought that while Hillary didn't show the best judgement, she is right that the deplorable Americans support tRump  - just like the deplorable Germans supported Hitler.  How is that for a response?

A:
Non-threat
****