In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

Example Input: Comment: This country was founded as a white racist nation. The proof is in the original Constitution. Violence has always been at its core. What do you think the 2nd Amendment was needed for? The nation was built on ethic cleansing of the locals and race based slavery. The country has been a giant affirmative action program for people that Europe didn't need or want. We have been working on becoming "a more perfect union" ever since. As we move ever so slowly toward a merit based society, white male privilege is losing power. It is now illegal to kill black people while they are praying in church. That use to be one of the many white privileges that white men had. Lynchings are no longer considered family entertainment. There are photos. White folks invented the "race card" when they decided that being white was more important than being human. The good news is that younger people are generally less racist than their elders. In another 200 years, all lives may actually matter in this country.
Example Output: Identity-attack

Example Input: Comment: This is the first step to silence Canadians  about the evils of Islam...
Example Output: Identity-attack

Example Input: Comment: JIM, did you read  his essay? Did you pick up on the respectful, thoughtful tone he used in explaining that he rarely has this problem, that he did not expect the manager to pronounce his name correctly, but merely to attempt it. The arrogance is in your comment.
Example Output:
Non-identity-attack