TASK DEFINITION: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
PROBLEM: You do understand that you can't prove a negative right? People of faith are the ones making wild ass claims about magic sky wizards with no supporting evidence it is incumbent on them to provide proof of their claims not the other way around.

SOLUTION: No

PROBLEM: You are kidding, right?  I love my dogs, but as soon as they started to lose their dignity, I put them down.  If a domesticated German Shepard lived to 13 years, like, mine did, that's a good, long life.  She was spoiled and loved and we still miss her, but when a dog's time is up, it's up.  Its in her best interest to be put down in dignity.  BTW, I am a city boy that grew up in Philly and now live on the beach in Florida.  I'm not a farmer with livestock to lose.  But, equating very old wolves that kill livestock to shooting a Grandmom, is very, very stupid.  I don't get that comparison at all.

SOLUTION: Yes

PROBLEM: The highway is only dangerous due to the carelessness of its drivers. Straighten it out and spending all that money, will not change anything. Most people  who argued against Rick Sinnott's article uses the same logic that anti-gun liberals uses to ban guns, "because it dangerous".  Hypocrisy is running high here.

SOLUTION:
No