The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the self-need strategy, otherwise output No. self-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to create a personal need for an item in the negotiation, such as by pointing out that the participant sweats a lot to show preference towards water packages.

Context: 'Yes, and I'll get 1 package of food and all of the firewood.' 'Okay I think this might be a good deal. ' 'Actually, I've just thought about it and I'd also like one package of water. I think it'd be fair being that you're getting 2 packages of food.'
Utterance: 'Which means? Did you mean that I would take 2 packages of food and 2 packages of water? Then I will ask for one package of fire wood.'
No

Context: 'Im a vegitarian so food I would like 1 food and for fire 2' 'I think that we can work it out 🙂. We could do something like 2 firewood for you, 1 for me. 2 water for me, 1 for you. And 1 or 2 foods for you, 1 or 2 foods for me. What do you think?' 'That is a kind offer. 🙂 The water is very vital for me. How bout 3 water for me, 0 food for me 3 for you and 1 firewood for me and 2 for you '
Utterance: 'Zero water is not going to work 😮. I am willing to switch water and firewood amounts so that I get 2 firewood and 1 water and you get 2 water and 1 firewood. '
Yes

Context: 'I think can highly consider it, why do you prefer the firewood? ' 'for me, firewood is more useful ' 'I see. What do things would you use the firewood for?'
Utterance: 'cooking, and sometimes I put firewood in the fireplace to keep me warm'

Yes