In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

Input: Consider Input: Comment: Quote: "Michelle Obama is taking some heat for recent remarks she made on gender, but I'm struggling to muster outrage given the sheer incoherence of what she actually said."

True, I've rarely found what Michelle says coherent, but I suspect that what she's saying is primarily directed at black communities. She could have gone much further and bluntly stated that blacks coddle far too much the criminality and paternal irresponsibility in black males. (I won't call them men.) That's glaringly obvious and different from mostly white schools where ordinary boyishness is attacked as "toxic masculinity."

Output: Identity-attack


Input: Consider Input: Comment: How many scandals, false accusations of others, deaths and derelictions of duty to BCers do the BC Liberals have to rack up before people realize it's time to dump them.

Output: Non-identity-attack


Input: Consider Input: Comment: Actually, it's not clear whether the lovers were all female.  A few females complained, but the article went on to describe how the priest invited other priests to his sex parties.  It's a gay thing.


Output: Identity-attack