Given a document, generate a short title of the document. The title should convey the main idea/event/topic about which the document is being written. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

Input: Consider Input: The peer-to-peer lender LendingClub  is on the cusp of being investigated by the US Department of Justice and the Securities and Exchange Commission  and it is in emergency talks to coax more buyers onto its platform to shore up the business.
 LendingClub  made the disclosures in a regulatory filing on Monday.  It  follows the shock ousting of  LendingClub  founder and CEO Renaud Laplanche last week after an internal review. The stock crashed 26% on the day and is down over 50% since then.
The board cited issues with "data integrity and contract approval monitoring and review processes" for Laplanche's exit  as well as issues surrounding an apparent financial conflict of interest in an investment Laplanche made in a company doing business with  LendingClub .
The forced exit of Laplanche has sent  LendingClub  into a full-blown crisis that threatens the very core of  its  business.
UPDATE: Since  publication LendingClub  has provided BI with the following statement:
 LendingClub  was founded in 2007 and is a peer-to-peer lender; consumers can take out loans of up to $40 000 (Â£27 654)  supplied by a third party  that are then packaged up and sold to institutional investors who want to receive the stream of interest payments in return. It matches lenders with investors  a little like UK companies such as Zopa.
 LendingClub  says:
But Laplanche also failed to disclose his personal interest in  a fund that LendingClub was considering investing in   and The Journal claims he had invested millions in  that fund  so it could buy LendingClub's loans  effectively to boost demand.
The vehicle  which Bloomberg said was Cirrix Capital  bought $114.5 million worth of  LendingClub  loans in the first quarter of the year  according to Monday's filing.  LendingClub  director John Mack and Laplanche are all investors in Cirrix  according to Bloomberg. Cirrix is now helping Lending Club with emergency funding.
 LendingClub  claims to take no credit risk itself  but  it  clearly has some exposure to the risk if  it  is investing in a fund that is buying  its  loans. Discussing  LendingClub 's investment in the vehicle that bought the loans   LendingClub  says  it  "determined none of these events were required to be recognized or disclosed."
As a result of the whole fiasco   LendingClub  has received a grand jury subpoena from the US Department of Justice and has been contacted by the SEC   it  said in a filing on Monday.  The company  says "no assurance can be given as to the timing or outcome of these matters. "
LendingClub  also warns that  it  may face legal proceedings over the whole thing  but  it  says  it  doesn't think any liabilities from an eventual judgment will have a "material effect on  its  financial condition."
 LendingClub  is already facing two class-action lawsuits in the US  both filed since the start of the year.
One  filed in California  accuses  the company  of "making materially false and misleading statements in the registration statement and prospectus issued in connection with the IPO regarding  among other things  the company's business model  compliance with regulatory matters  and their impact on  the company 's business  operations  and future results."
Another  lodged in New York  claims people "received loans  through  the company 's platform  that exceeded states' usury limits in violation of state usury and consumer protection laws."
' The company  may need to use  its  own funds to purchase  these loans'

Output: LendingClub faces DOJ SEC investigations could buy more of its loans


Input: Consider Input: Joseph Lynn Pickett of Edwardsville  was also ordered to spend six months behind bars for the June threats  though  he 's already served the time since  his  arrest last year.
 Pickett  pleaded guilty in an agreement with prosecutors in October  after authorities said  he  posted several times online that  he  wanted to assassinate Trump.
The posts included frequent profanity and detailed death threats.  Pickett  also taunted federal authorities when  he  wasn't immediately arrested.
 His  co-workers reported the threatening posts to the Secret Service.  He  was later arrested.
Under terms of  his  sentencing last week   Pickett  also will be on supervised release for three years.

Output: Illinois man to get treatment after threatening Trump online


Input: Consider Input: 1.  He  was resigning  his  seat by the end of the year.
2.  He  didn't believe  he  had done anything for which  he  should have been forced to resign.
 Franken 's speech was defined primarily by  his  lack of any real apology and the clear bitterness  he  carries for being pushed out amid allegations that  he  had groped several women and forcibly tried to kiss others.
Here's the key bit from  Franken  (bolding is mine):
That's a remarkable statement.  Franken  is simultaneously saying that  he  believes the women who have accused  him  have a right to be heard while also making very clear that  he  is not admitting  he  had done the things they alleged.
 He  went on to note that "I know in my heart that nothing I have done as a senator  nothing has brought dishonor on this institution " adding: "I am confident that the ethics committee would agree."
And  just in case there was any question that  Franken  believed  he  was being unfairly railroaded  the senator's turn to Donald Trump and Roy Moore cleared all that up.
Said  Franken :
"I am leaving while a man who has bragged on tape about  his  history of sexual assault sits in the Oval Office and a man who repeatedly preyed on young girls campaigns for the Senate with the full support of his party. But this decision is not about me. It's about the people of Minnesota."
 Franken  got support in that view from an unlikely source on Thursday: Former Bush White House press secretary Ari Fleischer. " Franken  should not have resigned.  His  fate should have been left 2 the people of MN. Moore  who had sexual contact w a 14-yr old  should drop out. Conyers  who hit on his employees  should have resigned.  Franken  is a creep who acted inappropriatly  but  his  facts are different " tweeted Fleischer shortly after  Franken 's resignation announcement.
The second part of  Franken 's conclusion will have a lot of Democratic heads nodding. Why is  Franken  resigning for allegations of groping and unwanted kissing while Trump is in office after more than a dozen women accused him during the campaign of sexual harassment? Why is  Franken  resigning when Roy Moore  who faces multiple allegations of pursuing relationships with teenagers as young as 14 when  he  was in  his  30s  is looking more and more like a winner in next Tuesday's special election?
Those are fair questions. The simple reason is because  Franken  gave in to the pressure to step aside while Trump and Moore just kept saying they didn't do anything wrong and had no plans to leave their respective races. And the political willpower didn't exist in Alabama or the country to get rid of them.
But the first part of  Franken 's contention -- that  he  did not do anything wrong and these women were either mistaken or misremembering -- will sit less well even with  his  most ardent supporters.
If  Franken  truly believes -- as  he  said -- that  he  did nothing wrong here  then why is  he  resigning?  His  explanation was that  he  couldn't simultaneously deal with an ethics investigation and represent the state effectively. But  he  was the one who called for an ethics investigation when  he  announced last week that  he  was planning to stay on the job and work to win back the trust of  his  colleagues and  his  constituents!
The answer is that almost three dozen of  Franken 's colleagues called for  him  to step down over the last 24 hours -- including a united front of Democratic female senators . There was just no way that  Franken  could realistically stay on amid that depth of condemnation. (Although  per Trump and Moore  maybe he could have.)
 Franken  bowed to what he believed to be the inevitable political reality facing him. But in so doing   he  wanted to make sure everyone -- in the chamber and outside of it -- didn't see  his  resignation as an admission of guilt. Because  Franken  just doesn't think  he 's guilty.


Output: Al Franken 's totally unapologetic resignation