We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Ex Input:
Sent1: The death penalty has been used as a scapegoat for many people who are against executions.
 Sent2: the death penalty is also discriminatory in its application what i mean is that through out the world the death penalty is disproportionately used against disadvantaged people .

Ex Output:
Not similar


Ex Input:
Sent1: In fact, I think if Jesus did not believe in the death penalty, it would make his sacrifice that much greater, because he would be being unjustly put to death.
 Sent2: And because Christ forgave the men that unjustly killed him does not conclusivly show that He was against the death penalty.

Ex Output:
Not similar


Ex Input:
Sent1: In every state that retains the death penalty, jurors have the option of sentencing convicted capital murderers to life in prison without the possibility of parole.
 Sent2: I am advocating life in prison without the option of parole.

Ex Output:

Not similar