We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

[Q]: Sent1: Which is why the ban is a bit of a poor compromise, they've banned guns for law abiding people but they've not done enough to make sure criminals don't have them.
 Sent2: Even in Japan, the nation with the most absolute strictest gun laws in the world, criminals are still getting their hands on banned guns and killing people with them.
[A]: Similar


[Q]: Sent1: Or that the Second Amendment only keeps the federal government from passing new gun control laws?
 Sent2: Since that ruling most lower federal courts have continued to reject the argument that the second amendment protects an indivual right to own a gun.
[A]: Not similar


[Q]: Sent1: For instance I don't think that eliminating gun control is the only answer crime control is also needed.
 Sent2: I think we recognize that gun control laws can reduce the number of criminals owning guns although not disarm every criminal.
[A]:
Not similar