We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

Input: Consider Input: However when a militia group makes the news, these same anti-gunners are quick to paint them as dangerous, anti-government, and even racist extremists, and an example of why gun control needs to be further tightened.

Output: Valid


Input: Consider Input: And if a person has had treatment for a mental disorder, they should be given a mandatory psych exam by a neautral doctor before being denied on a gun purchase.

Output: Valid


Input: Consider Input: The only rights at risk in this entire thing are first amendment rights.


Output: Valid