Given a document, an entity and its sentiment towards the entity, verify if it is the correct sentiment towards the entity. Answer should be yes or no. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

Input: Consider Input: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Mark Emmert is Negative . A day after a report raised the possibility that the NCAA could have done more long ago about problems at  Michigan State  President Mark Emmert  said Saturday in an email that sexual assault allegations against Spartans athletes in 2010 were “widely reported” and already being investigated by law enforcement and the school.
 Emmert  made the comments in an email to the NCAA Board of Governors and other university presidents. Spokeswoman Stacey Osborn provided  Emmert’s  email to The Associated Press in response to a request for comment about a report by The Athletic that cited a letter sent in 2010 to NCAA leadership by the National Coalition Against Violent Athletes.
 Emmert  noted that  he  met with the coalition’s Katherine Redmond and legal expert Wendy Parker in November 2010. A letter sent by  Emmert   dated Dec. 6 and addressed to Redmond and Parker  was also provided to AP. It detailed programs the NCAA was helping to implement on campuses to address sexual violence and student behavior  though it made no specific reference to Michigan State.
As for his role   Emmert  told the NCAA board in his email: “The MSU cases were widely reported in the press and already being investigated by law enforcement and university officials. Kathy did not imply that these were unreported cases or that she was acting as a whistleblower to report unknown information to the letter’s recipients.”

Output: no


Input: Consider Input: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Michael Jackson is Neutral . Michael Jackson's mother sued a concert promoter Wednesday alleging the company failed to provide life-saving equipment and oversee a doctor who was hired to protect the pop star's well-being as he prepared for what were intended to be his comeback concerts.
 The suit contends AEG and its agents told Jackson the company would provide the equipment and hire Dr. Conrad Murray to care for Jackson so he could perform at the concerts in London.
 "AEG's representations to Jackson were false because in reality AEG was merely doing whatever it took to make sure that Michael Jackson could make it to rehearsals and shows and AEG did not provide a doctor who was truly looking out for Jackson's well-being and did not provide equipment " the lawsuit states.
 AEG Live President and CEO Randy Phillips said soon after Jackson's death in June 2009 that Murray was enlisted to act as Jackson's personal physician and was to be paid $150 000 a month by AEG Live as the singer prepared for the concerts.
 However  Jackson died before signing the agreement. As a result  Phillips said the agreement was not binding.
 The suit also said AEG Live was responsible for the actions of Murray in the care of Jackson. Murray  however  was not named as a defendant in the lawsuit.
 "At the time of his death  Michael Jackson was under the immediate care of a doctor selected by  hired by  and controlled by AEG; indeed AEG demanded and required that Michael Jackson be treated by this particular doctor to ensure that Michael Jackson would attend all rehearsals and shows on the tour " the complaint states.
 Murray has pleaded not guilty to involuntary manslaughter in Jackson's death at age 50. Police said Murray gave Jackson an overdose of the anesthetic propofol.
 The suit claims Jackson's eldest son  Prince  suffered great trauma and severe emotional distress because he witnessed his father's final moments.
 Despite years of self-imposed exile  he retained a huge  loyal following of fans overjoyed at the prospect of seeing him reclaim the glory he'd attained with albums like "Thriller" and songs like "Beat It!" and "Billie Jean."

Output: no


Input: Consider Input: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Medvedev is Neutral . Russia's catastrophic wildfires this summer have demonstrated the need to reform the nation's forest protection legislation and the state forestry agency  President Dmitry Medvedev said Wednesday.
 The remarks appeared to reflect Medvedev's desire to take a higher profile on economic and domestic policy issues presently controlled by Prime Minister Vladimir Putin -- though Medvedev stopped short of an open challenge to his powerful predecessor and mentor.
 Putin has taken a highly visible lead in efforts to combat the fires  visiting affected areas and even taking a seat in a firefighting plane while Medvedev was chairing dull official meetings. Many political commentators perceived Putin's action as a sign of his intention to reclaim the presidency in 2012 and a clear warning to Mevedev to stand by.
 Medvedev indicated Wednesday that the prime minister's move to take direct control of the forestry agency  Rosleskhoz  could be insufficient to properly protect the nation's forests in the future.
 "If it's more convenient to work that way  you are welcome " Medvedev told a government meeting focused on forests. "But if it proves insufficient  I reserve the right to radically change those structures."
 He said the blazes had shown that the current law and the existing official structures can't properly protect the forests.
 "It's quite obvious that the legal base and the organizational structure that we have don't fit the purpose " Medvedev said in televised remarks.
 The president also said that the need for changing the current forest legislation also must be carefully analyzed.
Putin and Medvedev both have said they would decide later who will run for president.
 Medvedev avoided any direct criticism of Putin  but said Wednesday the 2006 law had left most of the nation's forests without due oversight.
 He also seemed to defy Putin on another issue -- the construction of a new highway northwest of Moscow that would destroy a forest near the town of Khimki. Putin's Cabinet has continued to support it despite growing public opposition.


Output: no