In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine the neutral choice based on your inference from the statement and your commonsense knowledge. The neutral choice is a sentence that neither agrees nor disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3', corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence. If sentence X agrees with sentence Y, one's correctness follows from the other one. If sentence X disagrees with sentence Y, they can not be correct at the same time.

Statement: The region's waters abound in Lakeland char, perch, pike, vendace, and trout. Choices: 1. Trout and pike are two fish that reside in the region's waters. 2. Locals say that there's no beating the trout when it's freshly caught. 3. Trout and pike reside in the region's waters but vendace does not.
2

Statement: At first glance, reducing future benefits promised to current workers would not seem to increase resources available to invest now. Choices: 1. The reduction of future benefits includes healthcare insurance.  2. The reduction of future benefits for employees does not seem to make available investment opportunities.  3. Reducing future benefits for current workers results in more resources to invest with. 
1

Statement: Microgovernment does not seem to cost anything--no new budget lines, no new bureaucracies--but of course it does. Choices: 1. Microgovernment looks expensive, as can be seen from the budget lines, and so it's not surprising that it is expensive. 2. On paper, microgovernment doesn't cost anyone anything. 3. The cost of microgovernment is seen in the hours that people put in.

3