In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Input: Consider Input: Comment: Muslims can kiss my white christian ass.
Deleting this is an infringement on my freedom of speech.

Output: Sexual-explicit


Input: Consider Input: Comment: If the Democrats had any brains they would never "block" a Supreme Court nominee just based on ideology.  If they are not qualified that is one thing but if they are not a left winger that is nonsense.  Maybe the Republicans should then block any leftie from the court who is otherwise qualified.  This kind of stuff is what ruins our entire system and makes people not trust it at all.  We want good judges who are not buried in ideology but can rule on the facts and the law.  How hard is that?  Often, it is much easier than checking a potential ruling against a certain ideology.  Try it!

Output: Non-sexual-explicit


Input: Consider Input: Comment: "Watch Dear White People on Netflix. Then you'll get an idea of what's at stake."

You know that Dear White People is mostly a satire of the entire SJW phenomenon, right?  A huge component of that show is making the perpetually offended look ridiculous.


Output: Non-sexual-explicit