In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

Input: Consider Input: Comment: why can't someone feel threatened by big black woman and get rid of her?  what a farce..  what society must accept anything just because they are blacks?  no...

Output: Identity-attack


Input: Consider Input: Comment: In light of this slaughter by a Muslim, will gay bars be allowed to profile young male Arabs?

Output: Identity-attack


Input: Consider Input: Comment: When Trump was presented with a saber of some sort at a Coast Guard Academy graduation, Kelly was heard on a hot mic telling Trump to use it (the saber) on the press.
Haha.  Good joke?
Or, portend and glimpse into the soul of a man?
Is "life" that cheap to Kelly?  Do "some" deserve to be slashed or cut or disemboweled with a saber because they disagree with him and the President?  Is there a class or occupation or life circumstance of American who can be discarded that way?  Or, at least can be the subject of such "entertaining" and "glib" banter?
Remember, this guy's current claim to fame is how "well" he has executed Trump's immigration policy.
Yeah, he's a general.  A high ranking US military guy.  Just like Admiral Yates Stirling, Jr., Commandant of the US Navy's 14th Naval District, headquartered in Hawaii in the 1930's.  Stirling being the monster who supported the lynching of a young Hawaiian man.  For no other reason than that he wasn't white.
We need to be vigilant.


Output: Non-identity-attack