In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: insult and non-insult. Insult is any lanugage or act that is disrespectful or scornfully abusive.

Comment: The RCMP advised previous to all this that in  70 % of these cases it was an Aboriginal relative that killed Aboriginal women- did we really need to spend  more time and money to learn this terrible fact.
Non-insult

Comment: But you're not sick & tired of Trump whining about everyone & everything and blaming all of his mistakes on everyone but himself?  Not to mention taking credit for things he had nothing to do with, like Fema's readiness to deal with catastrophes, which was done by Obama's order, during his presidency. 
By any reasonable, fact-based yardstick, Clinton was the better candidate and certainly would have been a better president. He'll, my 14 year old cat would be a better president. Trump is a terrible president; the worst we ever had and that is saying something.  We'd all be much better off - and not on the threshold of nuclear war - if the big-mouthed idiot for whom you voted kept his idiotic, thoughtless, unbelievably stupid, incendiary mental ramblings to himself.  Talk about showing what kind of person you are.
Insult

Comment: Maybe instead of re-branding, what needs to happen is the bishops need to change?  You can re-brand  poo as cavia, but it remains  poo.  How a bout a fortnight of living the way Jesus told his followers to live?

Non-insult