In this task, you must classify if a given review is positive/negative, indicating your answer as P or N.

Input: Consider Input: " holy man " boasts a sweet , gentle , comic performance from an unusually subdued eddie murphy and a few moderately funny skits .
unfortunately , to get to the good stuff you have to sit through a painfully long set - up , loads of tedious filler , interminable shots of jeff goldblum stammering and twitching ,
a superfluous romantic subplot and quite possibly the most annoying performance of robert loggia 's career .
if ever a movie screamed " wait for video so you can fast - forward through all the dull and annoying parts
, " this is it .
eddie murphy plays g , a robed nomadic pilgrim wandering the land enjoying the moment and spreading his spiritual message .
a chance meeting with ricky hayman ( goldblum ) ,
a stressed - out executive of a home - shopping channel , and kate newell ( kelly preston ) , a no - nonsense media analyst , results in physical injury to g . quicker than you can say " the odd couple ,
" g ends up rooming with an extremely leery ricky .
after some script gymnastics , g appears live on the air at the good buy shopping network , wreaking havoc on the cheesy product demonstrations , enraging network owner mr .
mcbainbridge ( loggia ) , and becoming a national media sensation .
" holy man " attempts to be several things at once .
it tries to satirize home shopping networks , but it 's difficult to effectively make fun of something that is already a self - parody .
the film attempts to teach us that collecting material possessions is merely a futile attempt to fill the spiritual holes in our hearts , but that 's common knowledge already .
" holy man " also tries to present a story of redemption , as ricky hayman tries to decide whether to exploit g 's good will to achieve financial security or do the right thing at the expense of his career .
anyone want to place a wager on his final decision ?
the one genuine asset in " holy man " is eddie murphy , who gives a charming performance , sharing love , good will and relevant advice to all those around him , while beaming his million dollar smile at just the right moments .
murphy is delightful and the film takes off whenever he 's onscreen .
unfortunately , he 's not onscreen enough .
jeff goldblum gets the lion 's share of screen time and his tired storyline weighs the proceedings down .
as his potential love interest , kelly preston tries to brighten things up , but she transforms from an all - business media shark to an empathic softy far too quickly and the abrupt change reeks of contrivance .
the other principal actor , robert loggia , wastes his talents in a one - note turn as a ruthless , screaming monster .
structurally unsound and way too long
, " holy man " is appealing when murphy is onscreen and dull
when he is n't . instead of dropping your money at the theater for this trifle , wait until it hits video and fast - forward past everything except the murphy scenes .
g suggests that we focus on enjoying the moment and that 's the best way to do so .

Output: N


Input: Consider Input: men in black is an explosive mix of science fiction , action , and comedy that hits the target in every possible way .
although another alien movie , men in black succeeds in every way
that independence day did n't , and towers above many other movies of its type .
the brilliant acting , especially by tommy lee jones as agent kay , is also as good as it gets .
director barry sonnenfeld , who was behind the camera for the addams family movies and get shorty , has crafted a masterpiece .
the story behind men in black is just as interesting as you would want it to be .
the men in black , or mib , are a top - secret governmental agency that is not known to exist .
the mib are responsible for " saving the world from the scum of the universe " .
a though job , indeed .
the film opens with a truckload of illegal aliens ( the human kind ) being transported across the mexico border and into the united states .
presumably , these " aliens " are all migrant workers .
that is , until the mib show up and begin interrogating them .
agent kay selects a particular suspicious worker and takes him away from the other local authorities to discover that he is not an illegal human alien , but a real extra - terrestrial alien .
when the alien makes a run for it , agent kay is forced to eliminate the alien with one of the mib 's very unique weapons , and after one of the local law enforcement officers witnesses this bizarre occurrence , agent kay is forced to use another very unique device on them .
the device , described as " out of state " , eliminates the memory of anyone it is used on .
>
from here , we are introduced to james edwards , played very well by will smith .
edwards , a police officer , is chasing a fleeing criminal .
the criminal gives a very good chase , and at one point when edwards confronts him , the criminal pulls out a very different looking weapon that disintegrated when it hit the ground .
edwards continues to chase the very athletic criminal to the top of a building , where the criminal informs edwards that he must let him go , because someone is after him .
edwards does n't take this seriously , but when the criminal shows very non - human characteristics and leaps off the building , he begins to wonder .
back at the police station , agent kay shows up to ask edwards a few questions .
he informs edwards that is was , in fact , a non - human that he was chasing , and that the gun he pulled out was definitely not man - made .
he has edwards identify the gun , and asks edwards to come to the mib headquarters the following day .
edwards arrives and finds that he is involved in a recruiting process , along with various other men who seem a bit more qualified than he .
after goofing up for half of the time , edwards puts on a show at the firing range , and agent kay notes the reason why he feels edwards should be the man to join the mib
: he chased down the " criminal " on foot , which is something that no one is supposed to be able to do .
in the meantime , an upstate new york farm has a very close encounter .
edgar ( vincent d'onofrio )
, owner of the farm , investigates a strange crash landing and is attacked by the inhabitant of the flying object , which presumes to jump inside edgar and use his body as a human transport .
the " bug " , as he is called , is an intergalactic terrorist who has come to earth to attempt to kill two ambassadors .
and it up to the mib , with newly recruited agent jay ( formerly james edwards ) to exterminate the bug and save the planet from intergalactic war .
men in black delightfully combines fast - paced action with often hilarious comedy , which is usually from will smith , although tommy lee jones opens up his comedic personality in this film .
the special effects are also very well done and are not the entire source of the plot , as in another big alien film from the past summer .
screenwriter ed solomon , writer of super mario bros .
and the upcoming x - men film , has surely struck gold with this story .
all ages will enjoy men in black .
it is an extremely fun film that you will want to see again .
although it runs a very quick and speedy 96 minutes , the entire film from beginning to end is a non - stop adventure .
the ending of the film , which ties up a few loose ends for one of the main characters , is also very well done
.
a sequel is already being planned , so there is more to look forward to !

Output: P


Input: Consider Input: oh god how many john grisham lawyer films we have been munundated with !
in a perfect world , " a civil action " would be a breath of fresh air .
it 's cynical about lawyers in a way that grisham is n't .
it 's romantic in the exact opposite way a grisham book / film is n't .
and , the capper , it has no distinct ending , and the law in hollywood films is that above all else , you must have an ending .
even if it 's based on a true story , a true story which has n't yet ended , you must supply an ending , a false one , but an ending nevertheless .
hell , " a civil action " is even more sly and more witty
than any of the grisham works put together ( and that includes " the firm , " the only novel of his that will ever be regarded as a classic ) .
yet it 's also oddly and slightly unsatisfying .
weird .
this is , in fact , a steve zallian film , not just the work of a hack , and zallian is the director of the much - admired " search for bobby fischer " ( did n't see it ) and writer of none other than " schindler 's list .
"
in short , i like this guy , and am a sucker for the way he tells his stories .
after all , apart from the obvious it's - a - holocaust - film and it's - a - spielberg - film , is n't " schindler 's list " just a damn brilliant film , not so much a holocaust film as it is a wonderful character study .
" a civil action " is the same way : it 's narrative is split between being a lawyer film and being a character study .
and it 's here that the film seems to go a bit wrong .
the main complaint of this film is that while , yes , it 's an engrossing lawyerly tale , it has no real ending , and that 's not necessarily the problem with the film .
it 's that it 's just kind of unsatisfying .
if this were a great film , it would feel complete , and still end basically the same way .
but this film just seems to end , and i do n't want to be stupid and suggest an alternate ending should be tacked on :
imagine , if you will , being one of those the film is about , looking forward to this film , and then discovered the truth has been through a surrealistic and unpleasant hollywood filter , just so the many wo n't bitch about what is , essentially , genuine .
but the fact that it just ends is not , in all actuality , what is wrong with it .
it 's rather that zallian has chosen , in the last half hour , to adandon the traditional lawyer story , and chose the other part of his story , the one about the lawyer , one jan schlictman ( john travolta ) , who 's shown in the opening and throughout most of the movie as a heartless but brilliant lawyer , brilliant because he 's manipulative and he always wins .
it wishes to make it all about jan in the end , but the truth is , his change , although nicely done , is not full .
we see him suffering from a personal crisis , and travolta does do a pretty good job in depicting his change of heart , but in the end , we do n't fully believe it .
and i think that the problem is when he has made his decision , the film choses an odd angle to go at , a noble one , but one that gives the film 's conclusion that of incompleteness .
in the opening of the film , we see him doing his old schtick , manipulating courts , winning cases effortlessly , and then discussing on a heard radio interview how great he is at his job and how much he cares for his cases .
in short , he 's full of bullshit
and we know it .
in the film , he takes a case that is hardly desired : a town where several of the children have died mysteriously of lukemia and the source of the illness seems to be from a local factory that may or may not have been dumping waste into the river .
point one
, it 's not of the usual criteria ( jan points out , wickedly , that dead or wounded children are n't nearly as sympathetic as those struck down in the midst of their success ) .
point two , it has been through several lawyers .
after turning them down , jan changes his mind ( a muddled scene - he stops his car on a bridge , looks out . .
.
is he feeling a sense of overachievement ? ) , and he and his team of lawyers ( tony shalhoub , zeljko ivanek , and accountant william h .
macy ) head out to the town to do battle with the town 's company .
they spend millions of dollars examining the land , test the water , what have you ( this is where stephen fry , a possible oscar nominee for his brilliant performance in " wilde , " pops up thanklessly ) , and in the meantime question the parents of the dead children , and then , unsuccessfully , the workers at the plant .
they also find themselves clashing with a brilliant lawyer for the company , the eccentric jerome facher , played by robert duvall ( more on him later on ) .
as we progress , we get so involved in the way the story is being told , which is engulfing everything around it , including the individual and brief stories of some of the townspeople ( one of the best is a bit with james gandolfini as an employee of the plant living across the street from kathleen quinland , who lost her child , who begins to have a personal crisis ) .
things begin to go downhill for the lawyers in the second half , as they are up against impossible odds : the judge ( john lithgow ) is not only a strickler , but a pal of facher ; the employees of the plant are either afraid or to loyal to testify ; no concrete evidence is being found , depsite the money spent to find it ; and they are quickly running out of money .
as macy mortgages everything he can , including their homes and their office , he slowly loses his sanity ( his meatiest role since , oh , " fargo " ) , and we the audience begin to feel a real loss of hope for our protagonist .
in fact , the last half hour is such a change from the rest of the film and so unresolved that it has been widely panned as not being up to par ( owen gleiberman , especially , criticized the film for not being overly - dramatic . . .
i suppose like a grisham novel ) .
this would n't be so if the change in jan had not been handled the way it is : instead of having a change of heart and automatically being perceived as good , he 's seen as being still full of bullshit . because he does n't take stock in the cares of his partners , and causes them all to lose their money and noteriaty in the lawyer field because he wants to help the people of the town , he is instead seen as being of good nature but not sure how to bring that out .
the final half tries to redeem this , as must have been the point of making this in zallian 's mind , but what follows is a series of scenes where we merely see him making personal stands for his beliefs , and though he has changed considerably from the opening moments when he 's seen speeding back and forth from the town that wishes to employ him ( and thusly receiving two speeding tickets ) , we still feel that the big change in his life is that he 's not rich and esteemed anymore ( the film 's final title card is witty but in all actuality shallow ) .
the fault is not that there is no closure to the court case
( it 's still going on , you know ) , but that its personal story feels like it needs either another chapter or another angle in the final one it has .
we need to feel like the character has really made a big change in his life , and that the story is how a story of strife like the one of the town could inspire such a whopping change in his personal life .
it only feels like half of that .
maybe even less .
and it 's not travolta , who does a great job here ( though never to be a truly memorable performance of his ) , but rather
zallian , whose final chapter needs a rewrite .
up to then , though , it 's an engrossing drama , one of the best of the year in fact , and one of the best lawyer films , period .
the reason is because it recognizes that a court trial is not about those being defended or prosecuted , but rather it 's about the lawyers , the knights who battle eachother .
we learn that the company is almost positively to blame for the deaths in the town , but the reason it ca n't be blamed is because it has the best prosecution you can find .
and duvall 's facher is such a brilliant character
and he does such a magnificent job at portraying that man that it 's almost easy to overlook how subtley great he is .
facher is seen as an elderly man , a goofy eccentric , carrying a broken brown bag with stickers on it , eating lunches out of paper bags , and making a point to take time out of his day to listen to the radio , and scold anyone who interupts him .
but look deeper and you see a master at work : his evil and manipulative nature are hidden under the eccentricities that others don upon him , and it 's difficult as hell to clearly generalize him in any way .
that 's why i liked this film : it 's hard to put a pointer on .
you can never see exactly where this film will land , and even when the credits roll , you still are n't sure what to make of it .
call it the zallian effect .
same thing happened with " schindler 's list " ( not that i 'm comparing oskar schindler to jan schlictman ) .
each film is so greatly crafted that you ca n't help but get involved in its broad storytelling , interesting characters , and , most peculiarly , the wit that comes along with it .
if only it felt totally complete ( like , say , " schindler 's list , " though at this point it may be unfair to make comparisons between the two ) , it might have been one of the best films of the year , and along with that , a full breath of fresh air .


Output: P