We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Example Input: Sent1: I see what you mean, but i'm still against killing people .
 Sent2: I find it quite strange that no one bothered to ask why you why are against killing people...
Example Output: Not similar

Example Input: Sent1: If these are indeed comparable, I wouldn't argue for the death penalty even in murder.
 Sent2: I am not a pacifist, so I am not opposed to all state-sanctioned killing.
Example Output: Not similar

Example Input: Sent1: The death penalty is the best possible deterrent for crime.
 Sent2: If we slap a guarantueed death penalty on murder then any following murderer commits the crime on pain of death which is a much better detterent.
Example Output:
Similar