In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence can be inferred from the statement. Incorrect choices change the meaning in important ways or have details that are not mentioned in the statement. Indicate your answer as 1,2, or 3 corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.

Statement: Another refreshing feature of Goodman's storytelling is that, unlike other members of fundamentalist sects one might find in novels, her characters don't chafe at their restrictions, or not too much. Choices:  1. Goodman's characters failing to question their restrictions is frustrating to read. 2. The fact that Goodman's characters in fundamental sects don't generally feel too restricted by the rules of their sects is a unique aspect of Goodman's storytelling. 3. The common novel story line that has members of fundamentalist sects yearning for freedom has become overused and stale.
2

Statement: The thundering Republican condemnations of the special prosecutor back then are just like the thundering Democratic condemnations today, down to the very phrase, four years and $40 million. Choices:  1. The thundering Republic condemnations back then are similar in many ways to the thundering Democratic condemnations of today.  2. The thundering Republican condemnations are in no way similar to the thundering Democratic condemnations. 3. The thundering Republican condemnations are four years and $40 million. 
3

Statement: This is the most curiously located of the stations, in the Ethiopian Convent on the roof of the Church of the Holy Sepulchre. Choices:  1. The most commonplace station is the Ethiopian Convent located in the basement of the Church of the Holy Sepulchre. 2. The Ethiopian Convent is the most curiously located station because it is so far out of the way. 3. The most extraordinary station is the Ethiopian Convent above the Church of the Holy Sepulchre.

3