The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.
--------
Question: Context: 'Hmmm i don't beleive i ever offered you everything for all the food. I will need at least one water. lets not be selfish.' 'Oh you are right sorry, I was mistaken.  Okay then, how about I get 1 food, 2 waters, and 3 firewood.  You can have 2 food and 1 water?' 'Well that would give you 6 rations and me 3. Again that is not very fair. If you want 1 food and all the fire wood that i need at least 2 waters. so again, 1 food, 1 water 3 wood for you'
Utterance: 'Okay, you have a deal. 🙂'

Answer: No


Question: Context: 'Yes I think that sounds fair.' 'So if I take 2 foods and 1 firewood, you take 1 food and 2 firewood. What would be fair for water?' 'What if I take two waters and you take one water then?'
Utterance: 'I think that sounds fair, since you compromised on food. Sounds like a deal!'

Answer: No


Question: Context: 'Not bad, yourself?' 'Pretty good. The kids are looking forward to this weekend's camping trip. ' 'I see, thankfully I do not have any.'
Utterance: 'yeah we got a lot of things planned for them at the campgrounds. they're going to be pretty busy'

Answer:
No