TASK DEFINITION: In this task, you will be shown a passage. You need to write a fill-in-the-gap question based on your understanding of the events that might be inferred from the passage. Your question should be answerable based on the passage and only have one correct answer. Show the gap in your question with a _ .
PROBLEM: Greece is threatening to seize property, land and businesses belonging to Germany if Berlin does not agree to compensate it for the Nazi occupation of the Second World War. Prime minister Alexis Tsipras has demanded Germany pay more than £112billion in reparations. He said previous payments did not cover demands for destroyed infrastructure, compensation for war crimes and the return of a forced loan to the Nazis. Greek Prime Minister Alexis Tsipras, who says that Germany owes his country compensation worth hundreds of billions of euros due to the Nazi occupation during the Second World War In an emotive address to his parliament he spoke of his government pursuing its ‘duty to history’ and the people who ‘fought and gave their lives to defeat Nazism’. Germany angrily dismissed the demands yesterday, saying it had paid reparations to Greece.Greece has threatened Germany saying it will seize its property and landComes as Athens and EU reach a stand-off over negotiations on debt crisisGreek Prime Minister says Germany owes his country war compensationAlexis Tsipras adds Angela Merkel owes his country up to 332 billion eurosBut Germany has dismissed the demands saying reparations have already been solved

SOLUTION: A spokesman for _ chancellor Angela Merkel said the issue had been ‘legally and politically resolved’ at that time and during the talks which led to German reunification in 1990.

PROBLEM: (CNN) Australia's deputy prime minister -- who once threatened to euthanize dogs belonging to Johnny Depp and Amber Heard -- has mocked the actors' videotaped apology for failing to declare the Yorkshire terriers when entering the country last year. Agriculture Minister Barnaby Joyce told Australian public broadcaster ABC that Depp "looked like he was auditioning for the Godfather" in the somber apology video, but said he did not "think he'll get an Academy Award for his performance." He doubled down on his criticism in an interview with CNN affiliate Channel 7's "Sunrise" program, advising the Academy Award-nominated actor to "do it again" with "a little gusto."Australia's deputy PM Barnaby Joyce advises Depp to reshoot apology video with "a little gusto"Depp and wife Amber Heard brought pet dogs into Australia without properly declaring themJoyce warned them at the time they had 72 hours to remove the dogs before the pets were destroyed

SOLUTION: The illegal import of animals carries a maximum penalty of 10 years in prison and a fine of 102,000 Australian dollars ($75,000); the false document charge has a maximum penalty of a year in prison and a fine of 10,200 _ dollars ($7,500).

PROBLEM: Crafty marketing ploys are tricking consumers into paying premium prices for poor food choices, consumer group Choice says. The advocacy group analysed the nutritional profile of 117 products marketing themselves as healthy and found a mixed bag when it came to assessing their health performance. The Choice investigation looked at products including McCain frozen pasta meals and Weight Watchers risotto, finding that products marketed as 'healthy' often received the same health rating as a regular product but they came with a hefty price markup. McCain Healthy Choice Italian Beef and Chia Meatballs with Wholemeal Spaghetti costs $1.85 per 100g, compared to McCain Spaghetti Bolognese which costs $1.50 per 100g but does not have 'healthy' branding.Marketing ploys trick consumers into paying more for poor food choicesConsumer group Choice analysed the nutritional profile of 117 productsIt found 'healthy' options were often no better for you than regular items but came with a hefty price markup

SOLUTION:
Choice also compared _ sweet potato and pumpkin risotto with Woolworths Select chicken and mushroom risotto, finding there was a 87 per cent price markup on the Weight Watchers meal despite the fact both items have a 3.5 star rating.