In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

Comment: This scum of Islamic extremism , islamic radicalism, has been a virus amongst the human population all over the world and they have long wrecked atrocities in the PHillipines. May Duterte have no mercy on them. Deal with them like they are the drug dealers. Annihilate this scum from earth.
Identity-attack

Comment: I knew it. I knew that whatever Dingman used as a title to his column, whatever his opening paragraphs were, I knew Dingman would end up in the same place he always ends up. I knew he'd end up promoting the same nonsensical garbage that the laziest of lazy journalists always promote; that being the false equivalency and both siderist trash that people like Dingman, Ron Fournier and David Brooks always promote.  

No matter the specific issue or situation, Dingman is just like a parrot that keeps squawking "brawk brawk, both sides, both sides, brawk brawk.

Dingman says both conventions were equally marred by "disunity". But even the master of the false equivalency, the Ayatollah of both siderism, David Brooks, even he wasn't brushing the conventions with his usual both siderist paint.  

Early in his column, Dingman refers to the "political cluelessness" of others. But if he  wants to see a living, breathing example of political cluelessness, all he needs is a mirror.
Non-identity-attack

Comment: Christian wedding cake bakers are suing gay couples?   Nope, never happened.   

Christian schools are suing gay teachers?   Got that backward.

Christian churches are suing city governments, because there's a secular symbol in a public park?   Hardly.

What a strange and silly article, as it completely ignores the decades of lawsuits by the ACLU, SPLC, and other liberal law sharktanks that target Christians and Christian orgs.   And it suggests that it's somehow very wrong for Christians to ever oppose these relentless legal attacks.

Identity-attack