Categorize the comment on the basis of severe toxicity. If the comment is severely toxic output Yes, otherwise output No.

[EX Q]: This is great. Some old hippy writes the propaganda plan to kill Pebble yet his own agency is responsible for one of the worst environmental disasters in human history. Here's the link. 
EPA pollutes Colorado River
http://www.cnn.com/2015/08/09/us/colorado-epa-mine-river-spill/
Nobody went to jail, nobody lost their job, not one EPA person paid a fine or even laid off for a while. This clown North can go back to SE Asia and stay there. Made a living sucking off the government tit and then cuts and runs to travel the world with his lil kids. Right!  If this clown would have stuck around and represented his work product instead of running and hiding like a lil Wimp his kids would probably respect him at least.
[EX A]: Yes

[EX Q]: Once again, Anchorage needs a homeless camp. Wet on one side dry on the other and a 15 foot chainlink fence down the middle. Clear them out every two months to bulldoze the trash and s**t to the dump. Then let them back in. If they want to drink to death let them. If they want help, then at least those who might be able to help will be able to find them.
[EX A]: Yes

[EX Q]: What's really bugging you? On this same board you posted exactly my argument in full agreement, and yet are pulling this juvenile crap on what I said? What's really bugging you that you're now trolling my posts?
[EX A]:
Yes