We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

[EX Q]: Sent1: We support letting people who already have guns actually being allowed to carry them, but I haven't seen anyone saying that we have to get hundreds of thousands of more guns bought up and distributed.
 Sent2: I seriously cannot believe that someone out there really thinks that we should allow EVERYBODY to carry weapons onto an airplane!
[EX A]: Not similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: And that assumes that gun control will have no effect on illegal firearm ownership.
 Sent2: If most gun crimes are committed by illegal firearm holders then it means that legal ownership of firearms combined with government monitoring can have a positive effect.
[EX A]: Not similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: The only case you could possibly make is more accidents with more guns at gun shows.
 Sent2: The only way the person would get the gun back is if the person was found not guilty.
[EX A]:
Not similar