Given a document and an entity the task is to select the author's sentiment towards the entity. Sentiments can be Positive, Neutral and Negative. Select Positive if the article expresses a positive view towards the given entity or praises its quality or skills. Select Neutral if the document expresses no clear view towards the entity or has equal amounts of positive and negative statements or expressing some fact/quote by someone else. Select Negative if the article expresses a negative view towards like harsh remarks, criticizing entities action/decision etc. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

[Q]: What is the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Bruce Maxwell ? And even now  itâs only been one player:  Aâs catcher Bruce Maxwell . In an interview with SI.com   Maxwellâs  mom offered this opinion on athletes deciding to take a knee:
I think you canât speak for everyone. Everyone has their own viewpoint  and everyone has their own story. Everyone has their own reason to do what theyâre doingâand all I can do is support  Bruce  for  his  reasoning. Because I know what  he  has gone through  and I know how  he  feels. I know this was a long time coming  but I think the turning point for  him  was when the president was in  his  hometown.
But why just  Maxwell ?
âWhen I was a kid  you had all these guys  athletes like Jim Brown  Muhammad Ali  and Kareem Abdul-Jabbar  following Dr. Martin Luther King. Iâll only speak for baseball  but nowadays  we  donât have an Ali.  We  donât even have the personalities of my generation and the one before me. Baseball has become so soldier-like  bow your head type stuff. In light of all that  for decades MLB players didnât stand for the flag. Youâd have guys in the locker room eating  stretching in the bullpen  sitting in the dugout  players were spread out all over the field. There was no idea of âunity.â Only the Braves and Yankees made it mandatory to stand on the top step of the dugout. That was the only time I even paid attention.
[A]: Positive


[Q]: What is the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Yngve Slyngstad ? Norway ’ s $ 1 trillion sovereign wealth fund will this year step up its assessment of the risks posed by climate change to its investments in power producers   oil firms and basic materials companies   its CEO told Reuters on Tuesday . Separately   the board of the central bank will soon decide whether to blacklist from the fund one or more companies -- either in the oil   steel or concrete sectors -- for producing too much greenhouse gases   the central bank chief told Reuters . The fund   which invests the proceeds from Norway ’ s oil and gas production for future pensions in stocks   bonds and real estate abroad   is one of the world ’ s biggest shareholders   with stakes totaling 1 . 4 percent of all listed companies . In recent years the world ’ s biggest sovereign wealth fund has become a more active shareholder   trying to influence companies ’ attitudes . Among them are the way companies report on climate change   such as their carbon dioxide emissions   or whether companies have scenario analyses of how more heatwaves   droughts or floods might affect their earnings .  Chief Executive Yngve Slyngstad  said the fund would first focus  its  efforts on electricity producers . “ That is ... the sector that we will first go through and think about in this scenario . The two next ones will be ( basic ) materials and oil .” “ By far the largest ... is electricity producers   which of course has been a specific focus for us because of the so - called coal criteria  ” he said referring to the fund not being allowed by parliament to invest in firms that derive more than 30 percent of their revenue from coal . The proposal to potentially exclude one or more companies in the oil   steel or cement sectors over excessive greenhouse gas emissions is under review by the board of the central bank . “ We have received some recommendations on potential exclusions based on that new criteria . The board is working on the issues ... It ’ s not going to be long  ” central bank governor Oeystein Olsen said   declining to give a more precise timeframe . Slideshow ( 2 Images ) The moves come as the fund is proposing to drop oil and gas stocks from its benchmark index   which would reduce over time its stakes in oil and gas companies . That proposal is under consideration at the finance ministry and will be voted by parliament at a later stage . DOUBLED ITS RETURN IN 2017 Also on Tuesday   the fund said it doubled its return on investment in 2017   beating its benchmark   as strong global stock markets boosted the value of the portfolio . It earned a return of 13 . 7 percent in 2017   up from 6 . 9 percent in 2016 . “ The fund ’ s cumulative return since inception has passed 4   000 billion Norwegian crowns ($ 511 billion ). One out of four crowns of return was generated in 2017   after a very strong year for the fund  ” Slyngstad said in a statement . “ Again   our equity investments returned strongest with a return close to 20 percent .” The fund ’ s biggest single company investment at the end of 2017 was in Apple Inc ( AAPL . O )  worth 66 billion crowns   ahead of Nestle ( NESN . S ) at 51 billion and Royal Dutch Shell ( RDSa . L ) at 50 billion . Apple was also the biggest single contributor to the fund ’ s returns in 2017   ahead of Chinese tech group Tencent Holdings ( 0700 . HK ) and Microsoft ( MSFT . O ). The fund ’ s size is equivalent to $ 200   000 for every Norwegian man   woman and child . The government withdrew 61 billion crowns during 2017 to pay for public expenses   compared with 101 billion crowns in 2016 .  Slyngstad  earned an annual salary of 6 . 7 million crowns   or roughly $ 855   000   in 2017   while  his  chief investment officer for equity strategies   Petter Johnsen   earned more   with 7 . 4 million crowns . By comparison   the country ’ s prime minister   Erna Solberg   earned 1 . 6 million crowns .
[A]: Neutral


[Q]: What is the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Christopher Kyba ? "The areas that are getting brighter rapidly are developing countries " says  Christopher Kyba  a researcher at the German Research Centre for Geosciences in Potsdam . "So a lot of places in South America  Africa and Asia are brightening really  really rapidly  up to 10 percent or more per year  even  in some cases."
With new solid-state lighting technology becoming available  some areas have started making a switch to LEDs. And because this satellite is not able to see all of the light emitted by LEDs   Kyba  says the brightening that's actually happening is probably greater than what's been measured.
"For the United States  for example  we don't see much of a change. But we know that a lot of LEDs are going in. And that means that the United States is almost certainly getting brighter  in terms of how people see the world with their human eyes "  Kyba  explains.
Some have suggested that energy-savings from LEDs will reduce the cost of lighting. But the researchers found that "as light gets cheaper  we use more of it  nearly proportionately to the rate at which it's getting cheaper  " Kyba  says.
On a global or national scale  all this wasted light is expensive   he  says: "It costs a lot of money to radiate that light into space and it's not doing anybody any good."
 He  and others argue that lighting efforts must be well-designed to reduce the amount of light going out into space while still providing a safe and comfortable experience for people on the ground who need to see at night.
The rapid increase in night lighting has been a profound change  a kind of global experiment  that has happened in just the last 100 years. "My mum  for example  grew up on a farm in Saskatchewan  in a time before they had electrification  " Kyba  says. "So  she  grew up with an amazing starry sky  and now  she  lives  within one lifetime  under a very light-polluted sky."
[A]:
Neutral