In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: insult and non-insult. Insult is any lanugage or act that is disrespectful or scornfully abusive.

[Q]: Comment: I suspected ESPERO had a hand in this situation, just as stupid as Hillary.
[A]: Insult


[Q]: Comment: Please stop being a dick. You've made your point, you don't like weed.
[A]: Insult


[Q]: Comment: Those persons who feel the officers were "in the wrong" and, essentially, murdered Finicum will never change their minds.  The videos and the investigation clearly debunk  the "hard right-wing" statements regarding the killing.   That makes absolutely no difference to such individuals.  Their comments are emotional, not rational and all efforts to convince them that the shooting was, in fact, justified are wasted.  

Look at the videos, including especially the one taken in the truck.  Listen to the audio of Finicum's statements.  Visit those right-wing sites which posted outrageous claims regarding "hundreds of shots" fired at the truck and the "murder" of Finicum and decide which version seems credible...the right-wing extremist's or the government's version, based on the videos and the investigation.  Getting into a grand argument with those attacking the officers is, to me, a wasted effort.
[A]:
Non-insult