In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

[EX Q]: Comment: "...the resulting ordinance instead requires a warrant and specific instructions to the inmate that they can deny the interview if they wish... Obviously, ICE is not pleased. And give the agency its due. "

Okay, ICE, here is your remittance as the DP has requested: You fascist jackboots will respect the will of our liberal democracy or we will correctly use it to righteously imprison and to punish you for your sins and we promise you that we will not make things easy for you if you push us to defend the principles of liberal democracy from your wrongful raping advances in this manner. You represent an illegitimate US Federal Executive, and you will not be afforded any quarter for your defiance of the true liberal democracy of The People. You've been warned.
-
Repent your sins and be at peace,
renounce all noise from orange-haired beasts.
You must not attack light nor good,
nor subvert land as darkness would.
[EX A]: Non-identity-attack

[EX Q]: Comment: Buddhists are FAKES! Their schtick is to shave their heads and wear orange rags begging at doors like the Mormons. They are rude and cheapskates. Not polite or peaceful at all. They covet rich expensive things like ordinary folks. In Thailand the soldiers and police are arresting them for bribes, tax evasion, rape and pedophilia (like Catholics). Trying to arrest one leader in a flying saucer-shaped temple for an investment scam but nobody can find him. They all look alike.
[EX A]: Identity-attack

[EX Q]: Comment: Tush, Mr. Smith. 

No Christian has been granted the license to read the Bible for himself or herself and interpret it as he/she sees fit. The Bible is rightly interpreted within the context of the Church's Tradition. Protestants, who believe that they are individually granted the imprimatur to interpret the Holy Scriptures according to their own lights, are in grave error. The whole counsel of God, found in the Bible and inthe rest of Sacred Tradition, does not & never can support the perversion of matrimony that is now called "gay marriage". There is no cherry-picking involved here.

Furthermore, you presume a lot when you accuse me of having been raised with homophobia. I have never been afraid of people who claim to be homosexual. Therefore, I am not now, nor have I ever been "homophobic", despite your accusation. God does not create gays; "gays" decide for themselves to indulge their own lusts. Any sexual sin that is committed by gay people is their own responsibility, not God's
[EX A]:
Identity-attack