In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence can be inferred from the statement. Incorrect choices change the meaning in important ways or have details that are not mentioned in the statement. Indicate your answer as 1,2, or 3 corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.

Q: Statement: Competition is generally believed to lead to efficiency, be it economic or technical. Choices:  1. Recent events have led people to question whether or not this conventional wisdom is true. 2. Technical efficiency is believed to be one of the results of competition. 3. Technical efficiency but not economic efficiency are the end results of competition.

A: 2
****
Q: Statement: When you hear that despite the fact that he has economists who know better, the Justice Department's Joel Klein apparently either believes or chooses to claim that this case is about path dependence, you start to wonder. Choices:  1. Joel Klein is lying about the case, and it's obvious why. 2. Joel Klein's claim that the case is about path dependence is fully backed up by his economists. 3. Joel Klein says that this case is about path dependence, even though the economists who work for him know that isn't true.

A: 3
****
Q: Statement: me too because we go all the time the guy i was talking to never goes he was boy it sounds like your really up on this and i said i see at least two a week  so Choices:  1. i haven't talked about this with anyone but i see like four a week 2. You seem really keen on this thing, whereas the guy I know couldn't be bothered 3. the guy i was talking to is my boyfriend and he's never watched any with me

A:
2
****