We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Sent1: An argument regarding the death penalty should be confined to discussions regarding those who have been wrongly convicted and sentenced to death.
 Sent2: The debate question asks "Should the death penalty be legalized?"
Not similar

Sent1: I have evidence that says that innocent people are convicted of crimes.
 Sent2: The evidence is overwhelming that some death penalty opponents were stating that the 102, nationwide, were actually innocent people, who had no connection to the murders.
Similar

Sent1: therefore the death penalty should not be used, simply because it kills innocent people.
 Sent2: There are also people who will tell you that the death penalty actually kills innocent people.

Similar