instruction:
The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.
question:
Context: 'I can give you two of the packages if you're willing to give me all 3 of the firewood. I left mine out in the rain a couple of nights ago so its all ruined.' 'If I will give 2 firewood for you and I will take all the food package with 2 water.' 'I need all 3 firewood! But I'm willing to discuss food with you. I have a lot of that.'
Utterance: 'Wow. Thank you. Ok. Then I will give you all 3 firewood, however I need all food package with water.'
answer:
No


question:
Context: 'We're really going to need that extra firewood.  We'll need the heat source, but also for cooking.  It a big deal that I get the extra wood, I hope you will understand why I need it.' 'my people feel like they need 1 extra of something or else they will throw a fit ☹️' 'No fits!!  They're getting that extra water they really want.  I am sure they'll be OK with giving a group with kids a little extra firewood to make this camping trip awesome for them'
Utterance: 'Okay if they get 3 water they are good with that allotment for the others'
answer:
Yes


question:
Context: 'I have kids as well who need food. I am just asking for one more food' 'we've given you all of the firewood, 2 of the waters' 'If you could add just one food I think we have a deal'
Utterance: 'you are going to have to toss something back our way, otherwise I will look weak to my family and they will not respect me'
answer:

Yes