Categorize the comment on the basis of severe toxicity. If the comment is severely toxic output Yes, otherwise output No.

[Q]: If you want to read a real eye opener on SuHydro heres the link.  Starts on Page 12.
  https://www.adn.com/sites/default/files/2003_06-AlaskaMegaProjects.pdf
References Bureau of Rec's failed attempt in the 1950's.  Kill this dog once and for all!
[A]: Yes


[Q]: Hugh: Ali would have looked down on you, and not respected you, unless you yourself are black, heterosexual, married to a black woman, and a Muslim.   If you don't fall into that category, then you would have been a devil in his eyes.

When asked by a BBC reporter about his beliefs that black people should not associate with whites, he said this:

"There are white people who mean right and in their hearts wanna do right. But if 10,000 rattlesnakes were coming down that aisle now, and I had a door that I could shut, and in that 10,000, 1,000 meant right, 1,000 rattlesnakes didn't want to bite me, I knew they were good... Should I let all these rattlesnakes come down, hoping that the thousand get together and form a shield for me? Or should I just close the door and stay safe?"

That is certainly not a man to be admired.  Not in my book.  The fact that his analogy for white people was that they are rattlesnakes says a lot.

What if a white person said that of blacks??
[A]: Yes


[Q]: If the GOP controls all three branches of government, what do you expect to happen? And if they don't win the WH, do you really expect them to cooperate?  They've been throwing a long temper tantrum since Obama was elected, and they will continue.  Right now they are pouting (and obstructing) because of an unexpected development.  Not one of the Republican candidates seems capable of handling the enormous challenges of governing, and their spoiled brats performance helps keep the rest of us from asking embarrassing questions.
[A]:
No