We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Ex Input:
There are many abstracts (short summaries of the entire paper) printed in this link.

Ex Output:
Invalid


Ex Input:
If you're arguing for a general principle (eg that Capital punishment is acceptible and effective) then you have to argue in the general case:

Ex Output:
Valid


Ex Input:
You said something to the effect of "should we really be giving this man the death penalty?"

Ex Output:

Valid