The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.

[Q]: Context: 'You have been most thoughtful during this negotiation I just want to say thank you for being so helpful.🙂' 'absolutly! You as well. So just to confirm. Me 2 food 1 water, 1 firewood. You, 1 food, 2 water, and 2 firewood? Sound good?' 'That looks like the correct arrangement, and again thank you and I wish you the best on your camping trip '
Utterance: 'sounds good! Looking forward to camping! maybe we'll run into each other on the trail! ;)'
[A]: No


[Q]: Context: 'Same here! We had a couple bumps in the road though, as our freezer stopped working so all our food went bad ☹️' 'That is rough ☹️  We should try to split the resources equitably then' 'Ya definitely. I need food and firewood most. What do you need?'
Utterance: 'I believe that we have the same priorities.  So we have a large family including children that need the food, but my wife also needs firewood due to poor circulation.  She is susceptible to frost bite and limb loss'
[A]: Yes


[Q]: Context: 'Oh, I see. How about 2 firewood for you and 2 food. I keep the rest' 'I don't really need food. I can do it with 1 firewood so you can get the rest. But I really need water. We are going hiking and drink a lot.' 'Ok, would you do 1 firewood, 2 water and 1 food then?'
Utterance: 'Can I get 3 water and 1 firewood instead?'
[A]:
No