instruction:
In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine the neutral choice based on your inference from the statement and your commonsense knowledge. The neutral choice is a sentence that neither agrees nor disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3', corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence. If sentence X agrees with sentence Y, one's correctness follows from the other one. If sentence X disagrees with sentence Y, they can not be correct at the same time.
question:
Statement: He would have had ample time to remove them and destroy them." Choices: 1. He didn't know where they were hidden. 2. He'd have had enough time to burn them. 3. He'd have had plenty of time to destroy them.
answer:
2


question:
Statement: 'Wouldn't that be extremely dangerous?' Choices: 1. I was concerned about the dangers involved.  2. That seems to be the safest route.  3. Would that not be hazardous?
answer:
1


question:
Statement: yes in in homicides related to other than i guess what are called uh crimes of passion uh for example you know as you as you very well know the great majority of homicides are people murdering other people they know mostly people they know Choices: 1. No homicides are performed by someone who knows the individual their killing personally. 2. Most homicide cases involve killing someone who someone else knows very well.  3. I've been informed of quite a few more cases of someone being killed who knew their killer than who didn't. 
answer:

3