The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the self-need strategy, otherwise output No. self-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to create a personal need for an item in the negotiation, such as by pointing out that the participant sweats a lot to show preference towards water packages.

Context: 'hmmmmm not possible. i need the same exact thing. what about i get 2 foods, 1 firewood and 2 water☹️' 'If you take 2 foods, 1 firewood, and 1 water that's a deal.  Otherwise I need the 2 foods, 1 firewood, and 2 water.  ' 'so let me get the remaining firewood then. making 2 foods, 2 firewood and 1 water🙂. or should i be going'
Utterance: 'You can have 2 firewood OR 2 food.  I prefer you take firewood as I need at least 2 food. Each of us gets 2 of something. '
No

Context: 'Oh no! I hope you are okay! ' 'Yeah, I'm okay now.  It's just that I need to have a lot of food around to be able to manage it properly.  Like on this camping trip.' 'I totally understand! I am in need of food too, but it sounds like you really need it so I am hapy to give you all of the food if I can have all of the firewood?'
Utterance: 'What is your need for water?  I could use some of that, too.'
No

Context: 'Hello, I hope you are having a good day! I would like to know what packages you need the most.' 'Hello, I'm having a wonderful day.🙂 Thanks for asking. I hope yours is a wonderful day as well. I would like 2 firewood, 2 water, and 1 food. How about you?' 'Glad to hear it! I am really looking to get extra firewood, so I would like to make a compromise. If I gave you all the food, could I have more firewood?'
Utterance: 'I like watching the camp fire all night. What is your reason for needing more firewood?'

Yes