Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.

Input: Consider Input: What does the rest of the Trump cheerleading squad have to say about this?

http://www.adn.com/politics/article/donald-trump-campaign-unveils-alaska-supporters-including-treadwell-mcguire/2016/05/16/

Output: Yes


Input: Consider Input: Glad you asked. Put all of the State of Alaska's revenue into the Permanent Fund which would raise the fund to around $70 billion. Then pay the state 4% of the fund balance every year to be used for their operating and capital expenses. In years when the fund produces more than 6% in earnings, pay the excess earnings out to the public in the form of a dividend. Under the plan, this year the State would get approximately $2.8 billion. Of course that is short of what they want but it is sustainable into perpetuity. Continuing to build to the Permanent Fund is the Future of Alaska. We accept pain now, for the benefit of a brighter future!

Output: No


Input: Consider Input: Who is " quiet and effective"? This anonymity lacks transparency which I thought was a Civil Beat goal.


Output: No