We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Q: They might not be sociologists but they know the difference between accuracy and non accuracy because they might have had experience dealing with reports like these.

A: Invalid
****
Q: >_> Says the person who brought up freaking Nelson in a debate about the death penalty for murders.

A: Valid
****
Q: Also, within the USA, murder rates are consistently lower in states that don't have capital punishment.

A:
Valid
****