We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

Ex Input:
Well, if you believe that this is a 'natural right' it only applies to non-Catholics, and is conditional by the law.

Ex Output:
Valid


Ex Input:
(After having several family members get killed by being shot from those with ILLEGAL guns you realise LEGAL guns aren't the problem)

Ex Output:
Valid


Ex Input:
I feel like existing laws need to actually be enforced and new ones targeted at those they are created for and not at legal law abiding gun owners.

Ex Output:

Valid