instruction:
Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
question:
Obama proved that the greedy, lazy, & uninformed would sell their liberty, & self respect for government, i.e. money stolen from others, hand out, benefit check, etc.
answer:
No


question:
The expressed problems seem small potatoes.  What should be a big problem is getting City Counsel to approve 24 million dollars for an inadequate glass outhouse ( my view of  the plans I have seen) sitting on the corner of the ghost of an award winning building ( I am in need of anger management about this issue).
answer:
No


question:
-"Welfare by any other name" - Actually it was originally both a strategic, politically "do-able" income equalization plan, to share oil wealth COMING FROM TRADITIONAL ALASKA NATIVE LANDS with all Alaskans, instead of "pissing it away", & seeing ALL of it go to the politically connected for whatever they wanted - and it has worked fairly well.. But the oil boom is over - - We need to reconfigure what & how we do services as a State:
  ***We need to maximize Permanent Fund earnings & help fund government with earnings interest;  ***We must wisely control budgets for outcome effectiveness, & avoid "iffy" capital spending; ***We must once again begin taxing ourselves with a 1.5% of gross income tax, and cut PFD cash payments & *** We must gradually move toward eliminating them as we reconfigure government services for residents - Our own "sovereign wealth" approach to providing resident services - similar to that being taken by Norway & Saudi Arabia. This is a time of opportunity!
answer:

No