Given a document and an entity the task is to select the author's sentiment towards the entity. Sentiments can be Positive, Neutral and Negative. Select Positive if the article expresses a positive view towards the given entity or praises its quality or skills. Select Neutral if the document expresses no clear view towards the entity or has equal amounts of positive and negative statements or expressing some fact/quote by someone else. Select Negative if the article expresses a negative view towards like harsh remarks, criticizing entities action/decision etc. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

Q: What is the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Uma Thurman ? Actress  Uma Thurman  finally broke  her  silence amid the ongoing #MeToo movement and accused disgraced producer Harvey Weinstein of sexual assault.
 Thurman  opened up to The New York Times in an article published Saturday which followed a viral Access Hollywood video from October 2017 that captured  her  telling reporters  she  would open up about  her  experiences with Weinstein when  she  was ready. The two worked together in âPulp Fictionâ and âKill Bill.â
 She  had remained mum on Weinstein following the bombshell exposes that revealed decades of alleged sexual abuse from the disgraced producer toward dozens of actresses.
 Thurman  said  she  became friendly with Weinsteinâs first wife  Eve  when she starred in âPulp Fictionâ and  she  knew him pretty well before âhe attacked.â  She  recalled a strange encounter with the famed producer in Paris.  She  said they were fighting over a script when he changed into a bathrobe.
âI didnât feel threatened â  Thurman  recalled. âI thought he was being super idiosyncratic  like this was your kooky  eccentric uncle.â
However  he then told  her  to follow him into a steam room.
âI was standing there in my full black leather outfit â boots  pants  jacket â  she  said. âAnd I was so hot and I said  âThis is ridiculous  what are you doing?â And he was getting very flustered and mad and he jumped up and ran out.â
âIt was such a bat to the head. He pushed me down. He tried to shove himself on me. He tried to expose himself. He did all kinds of unpleasant things. But he didnât actually put his back into it and force me â  she  recalled. âYouâre like an animal wriggling away  like a lizard. I was doing anything I could to get the train back on the track. My track. Not his track.â
Thurman said  she  received roses the next day from Weinstein telling  her   she  had âgreat instincts.â Following the assault  Weinsteinâs representatives called Thurman about upcoming projects.
However   she  wanted to confront Weinstein following the assault.  She  went to his hotel room and told Weinstein  âIf you do what you did to me to other people you will lose your career  your reputation and your family  I promise you.â
The actressâ friend  makeup artist Illona Herman  told the Times  she  had been at the London hotel waiting for Thurman to come down from meeting with Weinstein.  She  called that  her  friend looked frazzled.

A: Neutral
****
Q: What is the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Chloe Kim ? Extremely chill  Olympic snowboarder Chloe Kim  crushed the qualifier for the halfpipe on Monday  beating out the second-place finisher by over seven points.
Is the time between Olympic qualifying runs stressful? It was stressful for me to watch  so I assume yes. But did  Chloe Kim  still tweet about ice cream during this high-pressure time? Absolutely.
Could be down for some ice cream rn — Chloe Kim (@chloekimsnow) February 12  2018
yes... —  Chloe Kim  (@chloekimsnow) February 12  2018
Should  Chloe Kim  actually bring some ice cream to the competition next round  you will be the first to know. Until then  please temper your Olympics anxiety by channeling Chloe's nerves of steel.
Remember: you're on your couch.  She 's on top of a mountain and also on TV.

A: Positive
****
Q: What is the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Bashar al-Assad ? Representatives of President Bashar al-Assad's government -- who have trooped through many of Geneva's fine hotels -- have never even met face-to-face with Syria's opposition.
Yes  we have been here before. But this time it feels different. Russia is calling almost all the shots  making an outcome in  Assad 's favor much closer.
Indeed  the opposition has in the past insisted  Assad  must go almost as a precondition for talks rather than an outcome of the peace process itself. And where Obama supported this position  Trump is reversing from it.
In late October  US Secretary of State Rex Tillerson said: "The only thing that changed is when this administration came into office  we took a view that it is not a prerequisite that  Assad  go before that process starts; rather  the mechanism by which  Assad  departs will likely emerge from that process."
But as we approach this latest round of talks   Assad  seemed to be leveraging Trump's implicit support  delaying  his  delegation's arrival at the talks  pushing back against opposition demands  he  needs to go early in the talks process and not be part of a transitional government.
As the US bows out   Assad  appears empowered and the UN mediator weakened. On the eve of talks  he  issued a statement demanding no preconditions from either side.
Russia and the US agree to do all they can to reach a compromise -- Russia with  Assad ; the US with the opposition.
Yet each time talks collapse because  Assad 's forces ratchet up their offensives and sieges.
The opposition  not unreasonably  says it can't negotiate while its people are being starved and killed. Mediators call for pauses in the talks that can drag out for months. The pause then only ends when  Assad  wins whatever battle  he 'd used to stall the talks.
On the eve of these talks  Eastern Ghouta -- a suburb of Damascus -- is in the headlines. It is the latest pocket of opposition  Assad  is trying to extinguish. International observers will be watching carefully  albeit with no clout to change the dynamic  should  he  use the cover of these talks to accelerate attacks here.
Each time has  Assad  crashed the talks previously  Russia -- rather than convince  him  to stop -- has helped provide cover for  him .
That was Obama's understanding with Putin. The US believed Russia would do as it said it would -- namely  telling  Assad  to stop fighting -- and negotiate in good faith. It never happened.
When finally Russia did vote for UN Security Council Resolution 2254   calling for a political  not military solution and setting a time frame and process for  Assad  to end the war and transition from power  it seemed impossible the Russians could weasel out of their obligations again. Yet they did.
For any democratic leader  victory at the cost Syria has paid -- hundreds of thousands dead  more than half the population displaced  and close to 5 million refugees forced to flee the country -- would be pyrrhic in the extreme. But not for  Assad  and  his  ally Vladimir Putin.
How different things are now. As parties get ready to arrive in Geneva  Putin recently held a meeting with all the key powers in the region and beyond  which was notable for  Assad 's presence outside Syria for the first time in seven years.
That a man as paranoid as  Assad  could be lured from his safe Damascus lair is an indication of the influence Putin holds over him.

A:
Positive
****