In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

Ex Input:
Comment: The poor are easy targets.  Have fun, middle class assassins.

Ex Output:
Identity-attack


Ex Input:
Comment: Sullivan, Koch  griffin, Evans do we need to say more. Sullivan Figure it out you left us with a huge deficit , unfinished projects and terrible labor relations. You used Ernie Hall to attack labor. You are using Griffin now. You sir are definitely NOT you dad! Take your golden spoon and close mouth around it and please stay out of our business, You had your chance and you blew it.

Ex Output:
Non-identity-attack


Ex Input:
Comment: Was that before a black man went to an English court in Virginia and got it to "award" him, a former black indentured servant as a life-long  slave? (In the 1600's?  The 1st documented "slave" in the American colonies?) There were free blacks who owned black slaves.  Slavery was economic, not racial.  As for the 2nd amendment, neither the government nor the Constitution grant "rights". The Constitution lists the most important, which is directing the government to guarantee and protect them, nothing more or less! Man has had the natural right to self protection since the dawn of time.  And if you're referring to "stealing" a country (I'm assuming vis a vis the "indians") they weren't indigenous, they also came from somewhere else....and eliminated the peoples here before them.  Perhaps you should apply your same standards to the daily massacres committed BY blacks ON blacks in all  liberal controlled inner cities, like Baltimore, Detroit, Chicago, etc.  liberals are such hypocrites.

Ex Output:

Identity-attack