We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.
--------
Question: Sent1: IMHO, if we have the confidence in our system to throw someone in a cage for the rest of their natural life we should have the same confidence to put someone to death.
 Sent2: By the same token, if we keep administering the death penalty while the system is broken, we will have a much greater risk of putting someone innocent to death.

Answer: Not similar


Question: Sent1: So all in all I believe in the death penalty.
 Sent2: As far as I know, you may as well ACTUALLY believe any number of things, if you actually believe in the death penalty.

Answer: Not similar


Question: Sent1: And sure it is at a cost to the taxpayer, but whether or not we execute someone should not be dependent upon the relative financial cost.
 Sent2: The cost of execution is dependant on the state the prisoner is to be tried and executed in.

Answer:
Not similar