We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Q: Sent1: There are many reasons the death penalty should be abolished.
 Sent2: Is it reason to do away with the death penalty?

A: Not similar
****
Q: Sent1: I personally would never wish death penalty on someone no matter what they did to me/family/friends I would just want them in jail for a life sentence because then the threat is pretty much over.
 Sent2: Otherwise, if it is only a matter that you don't want to pay for them, then I should mention that the average capital punishment criminal costs more all together than does a lifer.

A: Not similar
****
Q: Sent1: Deterrence is not the only reason I support the death penalty.
 Sent2: Many people argue that the death penalty is not a detterence.

A:
Not similar
****