In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Q: Comment: The authors of the  JJ report insist that homosexuality played no role in the abuse crisis, but their own data undermine this conclusion. For example, they plainly admit that “81% of the victims [between 1950 and 2002] were male,” and that 78% were post-pubescent.

So if the abusers weren’t pedophiles, and the victims were mostly adolescent males, wouldn’t that make the victimizers homosexuals?

What else could we possibly be talking about if not homosexuality?

Why can't you answer this question?

A: Non-obscene
****
Q: Comment: Damn youre a pussy man

A: Obscene
****
Q: Comment: Former General Kelly really whipping White House staff into shape.

Aides have been told in no uncertain terms they must stop "dropping off articles on the president’s desk – and then waiting for him to react, with a screaming phone call."

Yeah, well, buffoons are in charge at the Trump White House.

A:
Non-obscene
****