In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

Comment: If_Peter_were_the_leader,_Paul_would_have_acknowldged_him_in_Romans._He_did_not.
Non-identity-attack

Comment: It's always amusing how these phony conservatives are on their knees to gang members, because they are on the public dole and and wear gang colors that they approve of. I don't mind paying one to kill and beat up people I don't like. (As long as the their time at the the trough is within reason) Must I kiss their behinds while they pick my pocket?
Non-identity-attack

Comment: I have no doubt that there is a 'homosexual lobby' in the Vatican.  It has been there for centuries.  We had popes, cardinals, arch/bishops, priests, religious---who have been homosexual.  My problem is the presence of homosexuals who PRETEND that they are celibate, when they are not.  My problem is with homosexuals who see nothing wrong in forcing themselves on youngsters or young men [aka. in seminaries], who are too fearful to resist. 

I questioned Layoftheland, because he provided NO evidence for his remarks.  Thank you for yours.

Identity-attack