In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: toxic and non-toxic. Toxicity is defiend as anything that is rude, disrespectful, or unreasonable that would make someone want to leave a converation.

Example Input: Comment: I won't call you a traitor, but I will call you an idiot!
Example Output: Toxic

Example Input: Comment: it is sick delusional idiots like you that dont get it,, see if a teacher perhaps had a gun it would of been stopped!
Example Output: Toxic

Example Input: Comment: The female tree planter from Alberta that was hitchhiking alone and disappeared is not included in the MMI, but friends and relatives combed the highway looking for her, to no avail ... same statistic, but not included.
Pickton victims were mixed, not only indigenous, but all were in the highest risk profession and addicted. Were certain families more involved than others in the search? Yes. Same risky behaviour yes. Did the law concentrate more on finding the non indigenous? Cite the source of any data on that ( do not even think of comparing a high risk victim to someone who has never been out of touch for more than a few hours in a low risk situation, and copious info is still active)

Another question
If aborigional men are the issue, unless THEY accept their ownership of the problem and receive help, how will the situation change? If the present leadership has not handled things appropriately before, CHANGE LEADERSHIP.
Example Output:
Non-toxic