TASK DEFINITION: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
PROBLEM: Comment: You need to have followed this disaster from the beginning to see that this current government was not the culprit.  Scheers defence of his former government's actions are indeed very weak. Under Canadian law Harper should have repatriated him much sooner and the financial damages would have been mitigated. 
Finally, Trudeau is correct a Canadian is a Canadian. There is also serious doubt that Khadr was the one who threw that grenade based on the forced confession the Americans imposed on him through torture. They have been discredited for that.

SOLUTION: Disagree

PROBLEM: Comment: I just hate the idea of a referendum. The cost would not be worth it. Getting even 30% turnout for an issue most Canadians don't understand and don't care about would be a minor miracle. Below a threshold of at least a 50%  turnout the results would be suspect. Voting would be split along party lines. Would this be fair to the people who are neutral or don't come out to vote? From one who campaigned for the "No" side in the Charlottetown Accord Referendum, please avoid a divisive referendum.

SOLUTION: Disagree

PROBLEM: Comment: No need for the TransMountain Pipe now or all that tanker traffic. Plenty of capacity with Keystone to the mid 2020's. By then, there may be no market for dirty expense Tar - why risk the cash.

SOLUTION:
Disagree