In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: threat and non-threat. Threat is a statement that someone will be hurt or harmed, especially if the person does not do something in particular.

Input: Consider Input: Comment: Isn't Rush the (other) big fat lying idiot complaining that warnings about Irma are sensationalism and people should generally not listen?

"Left" is wingnut speak for "rational" and "fact-based." Reality is facts that still remain facts even if you don't believe in them; all else is opinion.  And Rush deals solely in opinion.

Output: Non-threat


Input: Consider Input: Comment: Well, you were the one who specifically mentioned BLM. I was following up with a question to that. Some people are incapable of recognizing what BLM is. It's not a group that says ONLY black lives matter, it's a group that says black lives matter too. Because, unfortunately, it doesn't seem to be that obvious to some of the rogue police out there. Or some of the clueless citizenry.

Output: Non-threat


Input: Consider Input: Comment: So you're not against ending this financial disaster/fiasco/mismanagement at Middle Street? You'll still get your sweeping views from Pali Momi marred by the rusty choo choo tracks. 

You'll agree that the building through town, eventual O&M costs and even actual projected ridership (you just indirectly admitted you'll likely NEVER ride) are not even slightly known by the part-time mayor and HART and that the citizens will be unfairly burdened? 

Wouldn't you say it decent and fair to END something if you're using OTHER people's money and you don't even know how much MORE you'll have to BEG FOR, year after year???? 

Is it fair if that kid tried to make a decent life in the only home he knew (Hawaii), near his family and friends, but was then FORCED to move elsewhere because of this vanity project of corrupt, inept politicians????


Output: Non-threat