We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

[EX Q]: Sent1: If gun control will not affect criminal ownership of guns and people will always be able to get a firearm if they want, why should a government make the effort to ban firearms as a precursor to atrocities?
 Sent2: Some people who want to ban guns try to use simplistic arguments to suggest that murder rates are tied to the number of guns available for criminal misuse; and they suggest more guns = more crime and less guns = less crime.
[EX A]: Not similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: The only case you could possibly make is more accidents with more guns at gun shows.
 Sent2: The fact that you've committed murder is irrelevant and the only thing that matters is if a person has a gun?
[EX A]: Not similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: Roughly one person would die every minute if guns were banned.
 Sent2: Do not ban guns when guns are the tools of man.
[EX A]:
Not similar