The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the self-need strategy, otherwise output No. self-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to create a personal need for an item in the negotiation, such as by pointing out that the participant sweats a lot to show preference towards water packages.

[EX Q]: Context: 'It's been so cold these last few days, I'm worried that I didn't bring enough wood for the next few nights.' 'That is unfortunate. How about I give you are my firewood for all your food?'
Utterance: 'That is a very generous offer but I think I need to keep some food to be safe. Do you need any water?'
[EX A]: No

[EX Q]: Context: 'That sounds good but I need two foods please.' 'Hmm. :( How about I get 2 food and you get 1? That way it'll be slightly more equal' 'Since you are getting two firewoods I need two foods Let's deal on this.'
Utterance: 'Ok. Then how about I get two waters. I need the food, too. I got four mouths to feed. '
[EX A]: No

[EX Q]: Context: 'You already have all the basics, though, so you won't lack sufficient water to be hydrated. I have a serious medical condition that requires that I have access to additional water. ' 'The maximum bundle I can give is all packages of food + 1 package of water' 'Sorry, that won't work for me. I've already said that I have a medical condition that requires additional water. You do not need that much water just to be hydrated -- you already have basic water. I can give you all of the firewood, but I need all of the water. '
Utterance: 'In that case I exchange all the water only for all your firewood'
[EX A]:
No