In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

Example Input: Comment: I'd like to get on-board with you Les, but don't you think the president bears some responsibility for the negativity you reference? Tweeting about "The media is the enemy of the American people". Silly nonsense about the size of the crowd at the inauguration and the actress Meryl Streep, etc. Banning some of the press from a news conference just because they challenge him on some of the things he says? (I don't think we elected him "King and Supreme Ruler of the Land"). 
From your letter: "Wouldn’t it be more wise and reasonable for negative citizens to consider the damage and distraction they are causing? Wouldn’t it be better to remember the simple phrase, “e pluribus unum?” To date, I think President Trump is one of those "negative citizens" you're talking about.
In his speech last night he seemed to turn it around. If the guy, through talk and ACTION (policies) starts behaving like he wants to be president of all the people (what he was elected to be), I'll get on-board with you.
Example Output: Non-identity-attack

Example Input: Comment: It's always amusing how these phony conservatives are on their knees to gang members, because they are on the public dole and and wear gang colors that they approve of. I don't mind paying one to kill and beat up people I don't like. (As long as the their time at the the trough is within reason) Must I kiss their behinds while they pick my pocket?
Example Output: Non-identity-attack

Example Input: Comment: Last year at Pride, when Black Lives Matters accused the entire LGBT community of Toronto of being  nothing but oppressor class racists, did the Globe, CBC or Star  stand up in  defence of the gay community who have traditionally been open and accepting of all people. Did any politician ( Wynne, Trudeau, Wong Tam, Tory) speak against the sweeping slander of BLM? No of course not. They all tacitly agreed with BLM by refusing to refute the allegations. In white man's media , white man is always guilty. Appropriations just one more sin  we carry in our souls.
Example Output:
Identity-attack