In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

Q: Comment: Hmmmmm.
Let me see.  Someone to the south of us was just judged best suited for the task of the presidency solely because of his business background.
And he was celebrated during the campaign because he didn't "come across as "wishy washy."
That ain't working out too well. 
Maybe we should apply some other criteria when selecting these guys.
To quote Betrand Russell:
"The trouble with the world is that the stupid are cocksure and the intelligent are full of doubt."

A: Non-identity-attack
****
Q: Comment: As a woman (The Honest Courtesan) once remarked: "All women are whores." Get over yourself Wente.

A: Identity-attack
****
Q: Comment: Meh, Christians are just as ugly.  Just the opposite side of the same coin if you ask me.

And I can't begin to talk about Sweden, a country I know nothing about. But a quick Wiki search indicates that unlike the majority of countries in Europe, crime data in Sweden are collected when the offence in question is first reported, at which point the classification may be unclear. In Sweden, once an act has been registered as rape, it retains this classification in the published crime statistics, even if later investigations indicate that no crime can be proven or if the offence must be given an alternative judicial classification.

A:
Identity-attack
****