Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.

[EX Q]: This is the garbage that sickens me; not only is she culpable she's beyond an accessory to the fact as he couldn't have carried out his acts without her assistance!  If she was a man they would have had her in there right beside him but there really is sexual preference when it comes to charging women; the law is always lenient and I think that's down right ridiculous!! 

I hope the lawyers take every damn dime because lord knows those kids deserve every freaking Penny and then some for all the years of therapy and medical treatment they're going to need.  I'm so upset I'm close to vomiting over this; how can they not charge her? How do you think those victims feel?  

Law Abiding Citizen much?  Why do our DAs make deals with murderers and rapists :(
[EX A]: Yes

[EX Q]: The idea of fractionalized management of resources is of course a horrible idea, especially based on racial lines.  But if someone was going to propose it, one would think at least the proposal would include helping fund the management too.   Oh, that right, you want special privileges and status, and you want someone else to pay for it.
[EX A]: No

[EX Q]: I haven't been able to locate who exactly the beneficiaries of this race are. Where does the money raised go? How is it used? Check your charity at www.charitynavigator.org to see if you really agree with how the money is  used. Most organizations give the money they raise directly to the multi-billion dollar pharmaceutical industry for research. If you really want to help a cancer  patient, hire a housekeeper for them, or provide gifts cards for groceries.
[EX A]:
No