In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.
--------
Question: Sentence: The cat was lying by the mouse hole waiting for the mouse, but it was too impatient.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the cat because The mouse was aware of and avoiding the cat. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

Answer: Wrong


Question: Sentence: John couldn't see the stage with Billy in front of him because he is so short.
 Reason: The 'he' refers to john because , like Billy, he is a bit short and has a very long nose and a big nose. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

Answer: Wrong


Question: Sentence: Sam pulled up a chair to the piano, but it was broken, so he had to sing instead.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the piano because Sam had to stand; therefore the chair must be broken. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

Answer:
Wrong