The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the self-need strategy, otherwise output No. self-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to create a personal need for an item in the negotiation, such as by pointing out that the participant sweats a lot to show preference towards water packages.

Q: Context: 'Hi there! How are you?' 'Great! I'm very excited to go camping, how about you?' 'I am! Now, I need a lot of firewood because we were planning on burning some earlier (to start cooking meals and such). I also need some extra food in case bugs come and eat some (like last trip, ugh). How about I take 2 firewood, 2 food, and you take 3 water, 1 firewood, and 1 food?'
Utterance: 'Would you be open to taking 1 less firewood, I would give you 1 food for it. The weather is supposed to be extra chilly and we did not bring warm enough sleeping bags so we need the extra firewood to avoid freezing to death!'

A: Yes
****
Q: Context: 'i hope we can come to a compromise 🙂, what is another priority of yours besides the wood?' 'Food is a second priority for me, as I will be metal-detecting as well, & cannot risk fainting from the heat. How about I give you two firewood (I don't think we can "share", haha), you can give me two food packages, and two water packages.' 'okay, I am willing to give up more food to get the firewood, I like your offer🙂'
Utterance: 'I do as well. I'm glad we could come to an agreement! 🙂'

A: No
****
Q: Context: 'hello, I need plenty of food, I have lots of friends we are camping together.'
Utterance: 'bro i need aslo food, it is  my first priority'

A:
No
****