We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

[Q]: This decision, Cases v US, is where the militia connection qualification (fn2) was born and another, US v Tot is where the "state's right" interpretations (fn3) came into being
[A]: Valid


[Q]: You can't just claim "Country A has more gun control and a lower homicide rate than Country B does" and leave it at that.
[A]: Valid


[Q]: And on and on, with every order having the secondary effect of becoming a lifetime ban on gun possession.
[A]:
Valid