instruction:
In this task, you're given a paragraph and title from the research paper. Your task is to classify whether the given title is suitable or not for the research paper based on the given paragraph. Return "True" if title is proper according to paragraph else "False".
question:
Paragraph: Background: Public health emergencies have challenged the public health emergency management systems (PHEMSs) of many countries critically and frequently since this century. As the world's most populated country and the second biggest economy in the world, China used to have a fragile PHEMS; however, the government took forceful actions to build PHEMS after the 2003 SARS outbreak. After more than one decade's efforts, we tried to assess the improvements and problems of China's PHEMS between 2002 and 2012. Methods: We conducted two rounds of national surveys and collected the data of the year 2002 and 2012, including all 32 provincial, 139 municipal, and 489 county CDCs. The municipal and county CDCs were selected by systematic random sampling. Twenty-one indicators of four stages (preparation, readiness, response and recovery) from the National Assessment Criteria for CDC Performance were chosen to assess the ten-year trends. Results: At the preparation stage, organization, mechanisms, workforce, and stockpile across all levels and regions were significantly improved after one decade's efforts. At the readiness stage, the capability for formulating an emergency plan was also significantly improved during the same period. At the response stage, internet-based direct reporting was 98.8%, and coping scores were nearly full points of ten in 2012. At the recovery stage, the capabilities were generally lower than expected. Conclusions: Due to forceful leadership, sounder regulations, and intensive resources, China's PHEMS has been improved at the preparation, readiness, and response stages; however, the recovery stage was still weak and could not meet the requirements of crisis management and preventive governance. In addition, CDCs in the Western region and counties lagged behind in performance on most indicators. Future priorities should include developing the recovery stage, establishing a closed feedback loop, and strengthening the capabilities of CDCs in Western region and counties. 
 Title: The public health emergency management system in China: trends from 2002 to 2012
answer:
True


question:
Paragraph: We describe the association of caspase-dependent and caspase-independent mechanisms in macrophage apoptosis induced by LpqH, a 19 kDa Mycobacterium tuberculosis lipoprotein. LpqH triggered TLR2 activation, with upregulation of death receptors and ligands, which was followed by a death receptor signaling cascade with activation of initiator caspase 8 and executioner caspase 3. In this caspase-mediated phase, mitochondrial factors were involved in loss of mitochondrial transmembrane potential (ΔΨm), release of cytochrome c, and caspase 9 activation. Interestingly, a caspase-independent pathway was also identified; by immunoblot, the mitochondrial apoptosis inducing factor (AIF) was demonstrated in nuclei and cytosol of LpqH-treated macrophages. Confocal microscopy revealed translocation of AIF to the nuclei of the majority of apoptotic cells. These findings emphasize the complex and redundant nature of the macrophage death response to mycobacteria. 
 Title: Mycobacterium tuberculosis Lipoprotein (LpqH) Induces Macrophage Apoptosis through Extrinsic and Intrinsic Pathways: A Role for the Mitochondrial Apoptosis-Inducing Factor
answer:
True


question:
Paragraph: York, UK, was a good choice for the venue of this workshop because the history of nucleolar research-like the city-falls into distinct eras. Founded by the Romans in 71 AD, York has been occupied at various points in time by the Saxons, Vikings and Normans. Our understanding of the nucleolus has also followed a pattern in which rapid advances have been interspersed with periods of relative dormancy. The nucleolus was first observed early in the nineteenth century, but it was not until the 1960s that its role in ribosome biogenesis was established. After that, it was assumed that the nucleolus did not do much else; however, to our surprise, many unexpected roles for the nucleolus have emerged in the past decade. The textbook view of the nucleolus shows a fibrillar centre surrounded by a ring of dense fibrillar components, with granular components scattered throughout the body of the nucleolus. However, D. Lafontaine (Brussels, Belgium) reminded us that most eukaryotes have only two subcompartments and lack the fibrillar centre (Thiry & Lafontaine, 2005) . This division between bipartite and tripartite nucleoli seems to have been a recent evolutionary event that 
 Title: What is new in the nucleolus? Workshop on the Nucleolus: New Perspectives
answer:

True