In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.

[EX Q]: Comment: The US position on this had nothing to do with Israel or Palestine, but everything to do with Obama's efforts to undermine Trump at every turn before he leaves office.  Kerry is a fool as Obama used him on this one, and today on the Russian hacking stuff.  Odd that both of these thing took 8 years for Obama to act.  Obama's real legacy will be that he was the President that created Donald Trump.  LOL!
[EX A]: Disagree

[EX Q]: Comment: Ahhh low effort cons always voting against their best interests.  So yes, a person making $205k/yr will see $5k of that taxed at 35%.  Really feel sorry for them.  There has been a massive diversion of wealth into the hands of fewer and fewer people and you conbots think it is about people making $200k a year.     Talk about being duped by your own anger and short sightedness.

As for the Vancouver scenario, let's see, someone making say $210k (one income btw) buys a $1.2 million dollar house in Vancouver proper, he/she would only be paying a 5-6x ratio.   Still doable considering most of our family incomes (2 incomes) come in around $75k nationally; so that family would have to pay 15x ratio.    And of course we are talking about the most expensive area of Canada.    Why you guys need to be dishonest is beyond me.
[EX A]: Disagree

[EX Q]: Comment: That is very good advice from a practical guy from Alberta. Bravo! Totally agree. So I'll say it again, get rid of wasteful practices instead of more revenue to continue wasteful practices (another example - the spectacular failure of the federal payroll system and IBM blundering on, without penalty).
[EX A]:
Agree