In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence can be inferred from the statement. Incorrect choices change the meaning in important ways or have details that are not mentioned in the statement. Indicate your answer as 1,2, or 3 corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.

Ex Input:
Statement: A few years later, he developed a fascination with the comely Catherine Oxenberg, then starring in the TV show Dynasty . Salinger traveled to California and had shown up on the set, according to biographer Hamilton. Choices:  1. Salinger took a liking to Catherine Oxenburg when she starred in Dynasty. 2. Salinger never traveled to California in order to show up on a tv set. 3. Salinger liked Oxenberg's character more than Oxenberg herself.

Ex Output:
1


Ex Input:
Statement: The thundering Republican condemnations of the special prosecutor back then are just like the thundering Democratic condemnations today, down to the very phrase, four years and $40 million. Choices:  1. The thundering Republic condemnations back then are similar in many ways to the thundering Democratic condemnations of today.  2. The thundering Republican condemnations are in no way similar to the thundering Democratic condemnations. 3. The thundering Republican condemnations are four years and $40 million. 

Ex Output:
3


Ex Input:
Statement: yeah i could see the word in my head i just couldn't pronounce it Choices:  1. I can pronounce everything easily without thinking. 2. I could imagine the word but not say it correctly. 3. I often imagine words before pronouncing them.

Ex Output:

2