The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the self-need strategy, otherwise output No. self-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to create a personal need for an item in the negotiation, such as by pointing out that the participant sweats a lot to show preference towards water packages.

Context: 'i need the firewood because i tend to catch a cold easily and also scared of the dark. i can give you 2 water and 2 food for 3 firewood and i food' 'will you allow me to get 3 waters and you can have the 3 firewood and 2 foods? 🙂' 'yes i can agree to that, thats a good compromise'
Utterance: 'yay, thank you so much! to very I am getting 3 waters, 0 firewood, and 1 food?'
No

Context: 'Hi there.  I'm hoping we can make a deal about me getting firewood.  I get really cold at night and I'd love to have my fire still going in the morning for coffee - I'd gladly share some if you pop by my campsite.' 'I am in dire need of firewood myself. I was planning on bringing food that needed to be cooked over flame. 😮' 'Well maybe we can find a way to split it!  This isn't a problem we can't solve.  Are you in need of food too, then?'
Utterance: 'That would be great! I don't need food as much as I am in need of firewood, to be honest.'
No

Context: 'Your needs are like mine. I have a condition that require  me to shower quite often. It is a shame but if I do not shower for 3 hours I will stink.  ' 'Well fortunately if you are camping that won't be too bad. You'll blend in with the wilderness.' 'My friends will run away. I will not be comfortable either. So how do we split what we have?'
Utterance: 'If they're true friends, they won't. I'll take 2 firewood, 2 water, 3 food.'

No