Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.

Have they started putting urinals in the woman's locker room yet?
Yes

Glad you asked. Put all of the State of Alaska's revenue into the Permanent Fund which would raise the fund to around $70 billion. Then pay the state 4% of the fund balance every year to be used for their operating and capital expenses. In years when the fund produces more than 6% in earnings, pay the excess earnings out to the public in the form of a dividend. Under the plan, this year the State would get approximately $2.8 billion. Of course that is short of what they want but it is sustainable into perpetuity. Continuing to build to the Permanent Fund is the Future of Alaska. We accept pain now, for the benefit of a brighter future!
No

All window dressing.  Trying to lure a few rational republicans back into the fold to keep the party from completely melting down.  Problem is, the same element that is cheering for Trump still calls themselves republicans.  This election is already in the bag for the dems.  The best the repubs can do is make a reach with Ryan in 2020, if the party survives.

Plenty to not like about Clinton.  I don't plan to vote for her.  But Trump is so bad that you'd have to hate America to vote for him.  Time to vote for a third party candidate.  If they get enough votes they may get to play in the 2020 sandbox.  Wouldn't the debates be a lot more interesting with a third perspective on the stage?

The congressional elections are sure going to be interesting for the next couple cycles...

Yes