In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.
--------
Question: Comment: The Taliban is the same terrorist organization that entered a peaceful community opposed to their governance and hanged the 8 year old son of the village leader. This happened about seven years ago and was reported by this e-paper. Murdering a young female child of a prisoner would fall within the base behaviour of the Taliban.  They also bomb men, women, and children indiscriminately. I would going about arranging a fatweh type decree against the perpetrators of this unspeakable crime, were I a Muslin father.  This murdered child was Canadian/American as well.

Answer: Non-sexual-explicit


Question: Comment: Yeah some "choice" I have to make, I still can't believe it's come down to this. Sign of the times I guess. In reality my vote here in Oregon is even less than meaningless since we aren't a battleground state and will go Democratic come h*ll or highwater. I suppose I could vote for one of the minor parties as a protest vote, although deep down I know that pigs will fly before they ever sniff the WH.  A "better tomorrow"? Hope does spring eternal.

Answer: Non-sexual-explicit


Question: Comment: Kicking' the can down the road...again.  Session of 90 days (voter mandate)-ignored; extra days for 120 total (constitutionally mandated)-ignored; extra session-unproductive.  Okay, representatives: ya don't like what the governor wants or what the senate passes??  Then come up with your own possible SOLUTION!!  At least the Senate made a start...hellofalot more than accomplished by the House.  And the kicker: Chenault gets an award and STANDING OVATION for his time as House "leader".  This lack of anything is like kicking sand in the face of all Alaskans.  Vote 'em all out!

Answer:
Non-sexual-explicit