We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

[EX Q]: Sent1: if it's murder then okay... the criminal deserves the death penalty.
 Sent2: You might say the criminal deserved it, but murder is murder, whether they deserved it or not.
[EX A]: Not similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: The death penalty can be viewed as legalized murder, which is ironic considering that such a punishment is only imposed because of the cruelty of the crime - murder.
 Sent2: I think the death penalty is an archaic and obsolete form of punishment, even for the crime of murder.
[EX A]: Not similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: If the death penalty deters murder (as you claim) then why does Europe have a lower murder rate even though they've outlawed the death penalty?
 Sent2: The death penalty as a deterrent, our murder rate loudly speaks to that.
[EX A]:
Similar