The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the self-need strategy, otherwise output No. self-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to create a personal need for an item in the negotiation, such as by pointing out that the participant sweats a lot to show preference towards water packages.

Q: Context: 'Aww I'm sorry to hear that, it sounds like it might be better to have her bring her own food. I'll be bringing my teenage son so it would be awesome to get any extra food for him that I can. You know how they be! 🙂' 'What about I take 2 of the packages and you take 1? I know teenagers also drink a lot of water haha 🙂' 'He definitely does drink a lot of water, but he's in a growth spurt so 2 would be ideal. I'm happy to give up all firewood in exchange for the extra food!'
Utterance: 'okay that sounds like a better deal then! I will take all the firewood and 1 food, and you can take the 2 food packages'

A: No
****
Q: Context: 'I can give you 2 units of firewood, but I need at least 1 as well. ' 'How much food do you need?' 'If you give me 1 unit each of water and firewood, I'll give you 2 units of food for helping me out'
Utterance: 'I may need two food, I don't know how much fish I can catch.'

A: Yes
****
Q: Context: 'I have enough food too. Can I take 2 water, 1 firewood and 2 food?' 'How about two water, 1 firewood and 1 food, since we both value water the most?' 'Is that what you want or what you are offering?'
Utterance: 'That's what I'm offering to you, but I think it's a fair deal, so I'd accept it myself, too.'

A:
No
****