The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the self-need strategy, otherwise output No. self-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to create a personal need for an item in the negotiation, such as by pointing out that the participant sweats a lot to show preference towards water packages.

[Q]: Context: 'Hi I am also going camping. Unfortunately I need as much firewood and water as possible too. I need to be able to cook our food and stay warm all night ' 'Can I ask how many people are camping with you? Are you planning on hiking the mountain?' 'Oh yes, I have my whole family coming. I'm really excited because we don't see each other often. My aunts, uncles, cousins. Some of us will hike while others stay back. Maybe we can come to an agreement? Will you also be hiking?'
Utterance: 'Yes hiking for sure.  If I take 2 firewoods and give you 2 waters and 1 food, would that be acceptable?'
[A]: No


[Q]: Context: 'The weather is going to be really hot. Could I have 2 water in exchange for you receiving 2 food and 2 firewood?' 'I have a low immune system and need to stay warm how about I get all 3 firewood in exchange for the 2 water. ' 'I will agree to 3 firewood for 2 water. Maybe I should extra food though so 2 food for me🙂'
Utterance: 'I can agree to 2 food. You get 2 and I will get 1 food. That sounds fair to me. 🙂'
[A]: No


[Q]: Context: 'I'm fine, let's talk about how we can come to a fair deal.' 'Sure, my number one item if food if you can spare any.' 'It'd be nice if we can both get an even split right?'
Utterance: 'Well some needs are higher than others.  I need more food but I can give up some firewood or water.'
[A]:
No