instruction:
Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
question:
"Each side takes the position of the man who was arrested for swinging his arms and hitting another in the nose, and asked the judge if he did not have a right to swing his arms in a free country. 'Your right to swing your arms ends just where the other man’s nose begins.' " (From a June 1919 Harvard Law Review article by legal philosopher Zechariah Chafee, Jr. titled “Freedom of Speech in War Time”) http://quoteinvestigator.com/2011/10/15/liberty-fist-nose/

If the Little Sisters of the Poor don't themselves believe in using contraception, they have the (religious) freedom to not use it. But when they start trying to impose their beliefs on employees, who might believe otherwise, they are going beyond their own (religious) freedoms and trying to impose their beliefs on others, i.e., to restrict the freedoms of others.

Yes, the lawyers can cite case law and legal doctrine. But none of that changes the basic principle that your freedoms end when you try to extend them to my body.
answer:
No


question:
Anchorage voters need to know that in the April 5 article by Tegan Hanlon, Tegan falsely stated that I told her that I ran to promote my book – I have demanded of her immediate supervisors that the ADN provide me a phone transcript of the interview which I plan to use in a defamation suit. As a result of Tegan’s patently false statement I have received the absolutely predictable defamation insults from the public. I made manifestly clear to Tegan – both in the phone interview and in previous emails to her – that the ONLY reason I ran is to inform the ASD parent population of the 4 issues already (during my “candidacy”) well-disseminated in print and over the air. Because of the disgusting assault on our children by treasonously negligent administrators, school board members and politicians continuing now after 25 yrs. I will be spending the bulk of my effort overseas. One day the children of today will look back in absolute disgust at the trashing of their champions.
answer:
No


question:
It is a common misconception among those who have not looked at Sanders' plan that he wants to burden taxpayers the cost of college tuition. "The cost of this $75 billion a year plan is fully paid for by imposing a tax of a fraction of a percent on Wall Street speculators who nearly destroyed the economy seven years ago. " I am assuming you are not a Wall Street speculator.
As far as taxpayers funding healthcare, who funds healthcare now? If business offers it as a benefit, it is less money for salaries. When people are bankrupt by a healthcare emergency, hospitals take a loss on money not paid. This raises the cost for other patients to compensate.
What Sanders would do is eliminate the insurance companies that are noting more than a for profit betting scheme. They bet they will take in more than they pay out. The difference is their profit. 
His plans are all laid out on the 'net. https://berniesanders.com/issues/
answer:

No