In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Input: Consider Input: Comment: I hear ya, damn that horrible free market system!

Output: Obscene


Input: Consider Input: Comment: That's a nice story, except that it's not true.  I was very surprised when I heard Kershaw wasn't starting.  Like I said, Darvish looked like crap in game 3, and his eyes looked lost.  No way I would have started him in a game 7 with Kershaw available.  And again, the metrics on Darvish vs. the Astros are pretty astounding.  Frankly, I wouldn't even have put Darvish on the roster for the WS, given his history with the Astros.

Output: Obscene


Input: Consider Input: Comment: Evidence is right here in this comments section. Go read the comments on the article about disabled people protesting proposed medicaid cuts, and then try to tell me with a straight face there aren't right-wingers there mocking and denigrating the disabled people. It's disgusting.


Output: Non-obscene