In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

Comment: Exactly.  In 2020 the Democrats could end up controlling everything.  You can't run as a populist and then screw everyone.  

Still, Trump's not in Office yet, so the future will tell.
Non-identity-attack

Comment: I knew it. I knew that whatever Dingman used as a title to his column, whatever his opening paragraphs were, I knew Dingman would end up in the same place he always ends up. I knew he'd end up promoting the same nonsensical garbage that the laziest of lazy journalists always promote; that being the false equivalency and both siderist trash that people like Dingman, Ron Fournier and David Brooks always promote.  

No matter the specific issue or situation, Dingman is just like a parrot that keeps squawking "brawk brawk, both sides, both sides, brawk brawk.

Dingman says both conventions were equally marred by "disunity". But even the master of the false equivalency, the Ayatollah of both siderism, David Brooks, even he wasn't brushing the conventions with his usual both siderist paint.  

Early in his column, Dingman refers to the "political cluelessness" of others. But if he  wants to see a living, breathing example of political cluelessness, all he needs is a mirror.
Non-identity-attack

Comment: All you human worshipers should put yer money where yer mouth is, and have sex with an AIDS-ridden black African, and see how multiculturalism works for you.

Just don't ask me to pay for yer sex disease.  And I don't care about any sick bastards you produce, either.  Let them die before yer eyes,  maybe you'll learn something.

Identity-attack