The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.

Q: Context: 'yeah. going good.' 'good to hear' 'How about the deal? '
Utterance: 'Sure. My kids are really looking forward to this camping trip but one has special needs and he has to have a specific diet. I am fairly flexible on the water and firewood but food is a must have for me.'

A: Yes
****
Q: Context: 'Hello, are there any of the three items that you want to be sure you have enough of? 🙂' 'I want to be sure that I have enough firewood.  I want to relax, sit around the campfire, and roast hot dogs and marshmallows.  What about you?'
Utterance: 'That sounds great! I like all three items, but I definitely want to make sure I have enough water, especially to drink and stay hydrated and full of as much energy as possible. I require a lot of liquid as a 6-foot-4, 260-pound guy!'

A: No
****
Q: Context: 'Hi, how is your trip going? hopefully better than mine'
Utterance: 'My trip is going pretty so so too  im sorry to hear that about yours!! sounds like we both are gonna need some extra stuff? I was wondering if we could start with the water? any chance i could have it all and you can have all of something else? thoughts? im open to discussion'

A:
No
****