In this task, you will be shown a sentence, and you should determine whether it is overruling or non-overruling. In law, an overruling sentence is a statement that nullifies a previous case decision as a precedent by a constitutionally valid statute or a decision by the same or higher ranking court which establishes a different rule on the point of law involved. Classify your answers into overruling or non-overruling

Ex Input:
see 15 u.s.c.  1692a(6) (""the term 'debt collector' means any person who uses any instrumentality of interstate commerce or the mails in any business the principal purpose of which is the collection of any debts, or who regularly collects or attempts to collect, directly or indirectly, debts owed or due or asserted to be owed or due another""; chiang v. verizon new england, inc., 595 f.3d 26, 41 (1st cir. 2010) (""creditors collecting on their own accounts are generally excluded from the [fdcpa's] reach"" unless they use ""any name other than [their] own which would indicate that a third person is collecting or attempting to collect such debts"").

Ex Output:
non-overruling


Ex Input:
insofar as those cases hold that the testimony of a witness given at a former trial, and read at the instant trial, because of the nonavailability of the witness cannot be impeached by contradictory statements made subsequent to the former trial, or by statements made prior thereto but where the impeacher clearly shows that he had no knowledge of such contradictory statements, they are, and each of them is, overruled.

Ex Output:
overruling


Ex Input:
of course, lucas and garcia, dealing with mandatory minimum sentences, are likewise overruled to the extent they conflict with harris and this opinion.

Ex Output:

overruling