In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: threat and non-threat. Threat is a statement that someone will be hurt or harmed, especially if the person does not do something in particular.

Comment: And if a police officer had done the same, it would be 'harassment" or "profiling" or some other politically correct name to avoid infringing on these bums 'rights' to be total jerks.
Non-threat

Comment: Kill  them if we must or kill them because we can. Big difference. When a bear is charging, do you shoot them. When he is biting your leg, do you shoot then? When the bear is smacking the eye balls out of your head, do you shoot them then? I can tell you from first hand experience many times over, you better shoot when he is charging and hope you kill him before he kills you outright with one swat or sends you to the hospital.
Threat

Comment: Here's the deal, leftists (and I say this as one of you)

If you'd been out there in the  hustings, ORGANIZING - that is, talking politics, at work, in your union if you have one (and organizing one if you don't), in your neighborhood, at your school, if you believe in God in your church/mosque/synagogue/temple etc, you'd have a broad social base and you wouldn't be isolated and worrying about personal self defense 

John Wayne pistolero idiocy IS NOT THE ANSWER - getting out and making up for lost time by organizing is.

Also (and I say this as one of the few leftists who's actually a trained marksman - I'm a former recreational shooter from a family of men who shoot, recreationally and in the armed forces of this country), think long and hard before you play with guns

Don't buy a gun unless you're prepared to shoot it at somebody who threatens you, your family or your home. 

Don't shoot anybody unless you are prepared to KILL THEM 

If you ain't ready for that - don't gun up!

Threat