In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

[EX Q]: Comment: The Muslums are why I've lost my freedom, TSA ETC.
[EX A]: Identity-attack

[EX Q]: Comment: seems to me Dick your padding your assumptions a bit about the "largest voice of the people". 
  The largest voice of the Conoco caucus maybe and the oil lobby...,..but it seems like the people only get two minutes, and the oil lobbyists and legislators get richer..
[EX A]: Non-identity-attack

[EX Q]: Comment: Adrian Dix deserves to be shut-out of cabinet rather than rewarded with a cabinet post. The prior election was Dix's to lose and he did lose to Clark's Libs by presiding over a limp NDP campaign that barely bothered to criticise the BC Liberal gov't the NDP was running against. What kind of election campaign was that? One designed to LOSE. We have Dix to "thank" for multiple extra, unnecessary years of BC Liberal gov't. Why must we have to see Dix's face any more? May he fade far away instead.
[EX A]:
Non-identity-attack