In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence can be inferred from the statement. Incorrect choices change the meaning in important ways or have details that are not mentioned in the statement. Indicate your answer as 1,2, or 3 corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.

Input: Consider Input: Statement: A Washington Post piece bathed her in golden  She hopes to go to graduate school in sociology, she's scrimping because she doesn't want to burden her parents financially, she is so much a hostage to the media that she couldn't attend her own mom's wedding, and--the icing on the cake--she has taken up knitting. Choices:  1. The New York Times was the newspaper that opted to bathe her in gold. 2. She wanted to study sociology in graduate school so that she could explain people's behaviors. 3. She didn't want to put the financial burden on her parents so she took to scrimping and extreme saving.

Output: 3


Input: Consider Input: Statement: Since 1996 Legal Aid has increased its annual revenue by $6 million, renovated all of its offices and increased staff salaries Co which helps explain why 7 out of 13 chief (or managing) attorneys around the state are former Legal Aid lawyers who returned after stints in private or government practice. Choices:  1. Legal Aid raised its staff salaries and did some work on its offices. 2. Legal Aid workers got a ten percent raise on their salaries. 3. Legal Aid made some salary cuts for its staff, since 1996.

Output: 1


Input: Consider Input: Statement: Thorn rolled to his feet as the hammer came in again. Choices:  1. Thorn was unable to roll to his feet as the hammer came in again. 2. As the demon's hammer came in again, Thorn rolled to his feet. 3. As the hammer came in again, Thorn rolled to his feet.


Output: 3