We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Ex Input:
unfortunately the will of the people changes drastically over time, so the laws that are in place must be able to stand that test of time, and putting someone to death is punishment that should have stopped long ago.

Ex Output:
Valid


Ex Input:
If I had my way, we'd have no death penalty except for rare cases, and have time in prison be cruel and usual with regular torture.

Ex Output:
Valid


Ex Input:
So, since 1976, we have had possibly ONE innocent person executed out of 1000?

Ex Output:

Valid