In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Q: Comment: He "lowered the waistband of his pants while simultaneously elevating his genitals in a single suave, well-practiced motion."

A: Sexual-explicit
****
Q: Comment: Ya know, I gotta say, I don't find it much comfort to hear that "well, other denominations are losing adherents too."  (As bad as the "well, other people abuse children too" with the implication that the hierarchy is somehow excused from the abuse and cover-up.)  The overall drift away from Catholicism and other Christian denominations suggests a bigger overall problem.  Christianity began and grew in the midst of a decadent secular Roman society, so frankly, it's not society's fault.  I can't help thinking too many supposed Christian leaders have become too wrapped up in trying to dominate society with secular power rather than leading by spiritual example.

A: Non-sexual-explicit
****
Q: Comment: .
So, for all intents and purposes what Mr.Martin is suggesting;

The far right lunatic fringe is taking over the Republican Party in the US of A very much as the far right Reformers have taken over the Progressive Conservatives in Canada.

Sounds about right..........
.

A:
Non-sexual-explicit
****