In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Ex Input:
Comment: Interesting. The CBC ministry of truth. The MSM manufactured truth. Truth and nothing but the truth. 
"Tell the truth" says Will Smith.
The truth is the truth and when you have a good truth it's because it's the truth.

Ex Output:
Non-obscene


Ex Input:
Comment: "It does seem a little hypocritical for Dogwood to be complaining about Kinder Morgan playing a role in the B.C. election through its donations to the BC Liberals, when it is receiving money from the United States to fight for causes aligned with interests there. "
In one case, foreign interests donate money to advocacy groups.
In the other, foreign interests donate money to a political party whose members currently form the provincial government. 
Not even remotely equivalent, Gary, and tf. hardly hypocritical of Dogwood to complain about it.

Ex Output:
Non-obscene


Ex Input:
Comment: Hashtags and vigils are no substitute for the vigilance that should have been applied several decades ago. The odious ideology which gave rise to heinous terrorist attacks in recent history wasn't spread by prayer and chanting. From its inception, its adherents used ruthless violence to impose their will and their hateful beliefs on others.

Ex Output:

Non-obscene