In this task, you're given a statement, and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence clearly disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3' corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.
--------
Question: Statement: These uncertainties can be reduced by careful consideration of the differences in the health risk or air pollution commodity and the study populations in the underlying economic literature versus the context of benefits conferred by the Clear Skies Act. Choices:  1. There is no way to reduce these uncertainties at this time. 2. Careful observation and studying of health risks by air pollution can help ease uncertainties.  3. The risk of air pollution is the most important type of pollution which should be carefully considered. 

Answer: 1


Question: Statement: Next, we determine the total cost of delivery performed by the incumbent and a second firm that is assumed to be equally efficient. Choices:  1. The second firm is going to have a lower total cost of delivery. 2. We're just going to focus on determining the incumbent's total cost of delivery. 3. For the next step we look at both the incumbent's total cost of delivery and that of another firm that we will assume to be just as efficient.

Answer: 2


Question: Statement: Lola Thigh sang and preformed nightly at a venue of Klepacki's major competitor, also a Klepacki (don't confuse these two, the fact that both had the same last name was purely coincidental, and besides, the other one had a different first name - Jacek). Choices:  1. thigh was a singer and magician. 2. Thigh was a bookie. 3. Thigh sang every night in a club.

Answer:
2