We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gay Marriage) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gay marriage. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gay marriage.

[EX Q]: This is an a priori voter, if legitimate governments can't morally put restrictions on marriage, it becomes irrelevant if those restrictions would be socially beneficial or not.
[EX A]: Valid

[EX Q]: Mosy who do not want it to be allowed just dont like homosexuality all together, and therefore the opposing side tends to be prejudice.
[EX A]: Valid

[EX Q]: There original inclusion of it within mental disorders would have been a religious one (or at least a religious opinion back up with your 'not normal' defintion).
[EX A]:
Valid