In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine the neutral choice based on your inference from the statement and your commonsense knowledge. The neutral choice is a sentence that neither agrees nor disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3', corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence. If sentence X agrees with sentence Y, one's correctness follows from the other one. If sentence X disagrees with sentence Y, they can not be correct at the same time.

Statement: We are accustomed to defending free markets as the guarantors of both liberty and prosperity, but here's a case where liberty and prosperity are at  By forcing people to act against their own self-interest in the short run, governments can make everybody more prosperous in the long run. Choices: 1. Governments can make people thrive. 2. Governments can't do anything to fix the economy. 3. Governments can make the economy work for everyone.
3

Statement: But Pol Pot is irredeemable. Choices: 1. Pol Pot can never be redeemed.  2. Pol pot is irredeemable because it is too old.  3. Pol Pot is redeemable. 
2

Statement: Communication would be broken down, and to the extent in which communication of mind with mind has become impossible, it would be equally impossible to realize the idea of a lie. Choices: 1. Communication with mind to mind was impossible which changed everything. 2. It was possible to communicate mind to mind. 3. It would not be able to realize what was a lie.

1