We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

[EX Q]: Sent1: This appeared to me to be an argument that self defense cannot exist if a gun is used.
 Sent2: The question is whether or not it really matters if guns were used less for self defense and more for aggression.
[EX A]: Not similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: This is just further proof that gun control does not equal crime control and there are no "reasonable" nor "responsible" gun control laws.
 Sent2: Strange isn't where the law abiding are disarmed by the gun control idea of wet dream laws yet there are still firearms floating about the criminal classes.
[EX A]: Not similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: Well, owning handguns for personal home protection is different that carrying guns in a concealed fashion for protection.
 Sent2: It wouldn't protect the guns owned at the home of someone in the National Guard.]
[EX A]:
Not similar