In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: toxic and non-toxic. Toxicity is defiend as anything that is rude, disrespectful, or unreasonable that would make someone want to leave a converation.

[EX Q]: Comment: A firm justification for laws limiting the freedom of citizens is the protection of others who might be adversely affected.  In the case of alcohol, there is a potential danger of drunken driving and other acts committed under the influence.  Good laws do not limit individual freedom unless it significantly advances the safety or rights of the general population.  In the present instance, the purchase and use of cigarettes by the younger population does not significantly impact the safety or rights of the general population.  Therefore this restriction on freedom does not conform to good democratic practice.  The dangers of second hand smoke are addressed by other laws prohibiting smoking in various places.  This law represents only the limitation of individual freedom because of the opinions and preferences of others.  In a free society, limitations on freedom should be avoided except when absolutely necessary.
[EX A]: Non-toxic

[EX Q]: Comment: You're a fucking piece of shit idiot HRC supporting asshat. Hillary and idiots like you elected Trump by cheating Mr Sanders out of his rightful place as the Dem candidate. Here you are now trying to run your corrupt bullshit game on him some more. Go fuck yourself. This shit is your fault and you're trying to put that on the old, smart socialist Jew. Eat shit fucktard.
[EX A]: Toxic

[EX Q]: Comment: Fire his black ass
[EX A]:
Toxic