Categorize the comment on the basis of toxicity. If the comment is toxic (harmful, malicious, derogatory, threat, insult, identity attck, etc.) output Yes, otherwise output No.

Q: Buying Northern Dynasty stock back is definitely a better deal than providing tax credits for big oil.  Tax credits for oil exploration in the Inlet will never ever pay off.  Who knows what Pebble could be in a hundred years.  It might be like having Prudhoe in the bank all over again.  Right now Alaska could buy it back for a small fraction of the money invested.  We could have bought it back many times for the money wasted studying the gas line.  We could buy in back many times for what we are wasting in oil tax credits.

A: No
****
Q: Arun makes a number of good points and offers a perspective that undermines the demagogues of the right. The right loves simple easy answers to complex problems.  They miss their responsibility for creating the conditions that make for a rich soup of angry people who don't see any way out.  Of course we all know that the Iraqi war was the worst response, particular how the first six months were handled. Bush's team was arrogant. Blackwater was arrogant.  Debathification was stupid, and arrogant.  They left stock piles of bombs around Bagdad that slowly dissolved to become IEDs. And throughout this the words of support for Islam were undermined by the radical right.  And it's gotten worse, much worse as Fox and team rally their troops to undermine considered actions that could both reduce the hatred and tension and increase our ability to deal with extremists on both ends...great insights!

A: Yes
****
Q: And yet people like you never have one word to say about the RG editorial board publishing unsigned editorial after unsigned editorial day after day, because that would expose naked just how profoundly stupid your sophomoric drivel is. Ornery Bear, Eugene.

A:
Yes
****