In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: threat and non-threat. Threat is a statement that someone will be hurt or harmed, especially if the person does not do something in particular.

Input: Consider Input: Comment: Gee I hope you never get seriously ill, cuz you'll be dead.

Output: Threat


Input: Consider Input: Comment: Newsflash - Healthcare workers don't vaccinate for influenza because there is no quality empirical evidence to show it works. Do Dr Verncombe and career influenza physician Alison McGeer truly want to pretend healthcare workers, who are entrusted to life saving decisions everyday, are stupid and reckless, "swayed" by myths and lore? There is not a single RCT to illustrate healthcare worker vaccination helps protect vulnerable patients. There is zero evidence healthcare workers harm patients during influenza season. There is zero evidence masks do a single thing on a healthy, asymptomatic nurse other then shame them and undermine patient care. This political and industry motivated campaign is a reckless waste of precious public resources.

Output: Non-threat


Input: Consider Input: Comment: Before this deal, without any CanCon restrictions or broadcasting content rules, Netflix was arguably producing as much, if not more, top-quality Canadian content as any other broadcaster.

So what exactly are the CanCon rules meant to do?  Ensure more poor quality content that no one watches gets produced in addition to good stuff?  Because as far as I can tell that is all that they are accomplishing right now.  The broadcaster that need to follow CanCon rules have a small number of good Canadian TV shows that they bolster up with a bunch of short-lived, low-cost garbage to get over the quota.  Netflix doesn't have that quota so they don't bother with the garbage.  Is that a bad thing?


Output: Non-threat