TASK DEFINITION: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: threat and non-threat. Threat is a statement that someone will be hurt or harmed, especially if the person does not do something in particular.
PROBLEM: Comment: Whether I think a "political campaign should be carried out by 140 character tweets" or whether you do is irrelevant.  HIs Tweets worked.  He is the President-elect. 

 He didn't want to stay out the media; he wanted Free media; and he got it.

The Carnegie Mellon analysis is irrelevant to his results.  The US Army had to 'dumb down' its training to the 8th grade reading level when we went All Volunteer army in the 1980's.  And IQs have been steadily dropping since.  

Who do you think Motor Voter and other 'increase the number of voters' programs  were registering to vote?  Rhodes' Scholars and PhD Candidates?   Nope.  A lot of people who were either too disinterested or too ignorant to bother makes up that kind of registration.

SOLUTION: Non-threat

PROBLEM: Comment: At least these scholars are thinking for themselves, not something that is encouraged much in our schools - but should be. Issues such as this should be up for debate in every school in the country not give rise to disciplinary hearings. Nevertheless it is a mystery firstly why the EFF find it necessary to resort to threats of violence in a matter that involves school children and secondly why anyone would report the comments of Kevin Pietersen who time and again has shown himself to be nothing but a disruptive twat who is unable to exercise any rational judgment before opening his trap.

SOLUTION: Non-threat

PROBLEM: Comment: White Lives Matter!

Let's all go downtown tonight to loot, burn and riot!

SOLUTION:
Threat