We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

[EX Q]: Why should people who have been convicted be aable to appeal over and over untill he can no longer afford to appeal.
[EX A]: Valid

[EX Q]: If someone were to torture and kill one of my kids, I don�۪t think killing them would be punishment enough.
[EX A]: Valid

[EX Q]: If I heard of an innocent stranger being brutally killed, I might want to see the perpetrator suffer because of the suffering of the victim - that is VENGEANCE pure and simple.
[EX A]:
Valid