We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Input: Consider Input: When the criminal is in a well controlled prison, self-defense is no longer relevant - he is not capable of harming anyone.

Output: Valid


Input: Consider Input: To take an example: the tax-code contains numerous loopholes that allow unscrupulous folks to take advantage of it and keep money that many argue they should be paying into the system.

Output: Invalid


Input: Consider Input: No one will ever be able to convice me that 10 times more blacks deserved the death penalty.


Output: Valid