In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: threat and non-threat. Threat is a statement that someone will be hurt or harmed, especially if the person does not do something in particular.

[Q]: Comment: Trump qualifies as hyper-manic and a malignant narcissist. He lives his reality almost exclusively in the immediate moment.  It's why he can repeatedly tell his supporters that unlike Obama, he is going to take us out of Afghanistan and then turn right around and essentially follow the Obama course of action.  He can repeatedly scream in his rallies that Mexico will pay for his wall, and then castigate his own GOP Congressman for not putting tax payer funding for it in the debt ceiling bill.  I could cite more 'promises' that have been driven over by his bus of an ego, but my real question is why his supporters don't call him on any of his 'pivots'.  Then I remember the one place he hasn't pivoted is on his support for white male entitlement. But even with that one he's been so off the charts that even Playboy is now disowning their cover boy.  That has to be the prime indicator that Trump really is toxic crazy.
[A]: Non-threat


[Q]: Comment: So, the much vaunted TRUMPCARE has now become the DUMPCARE.

That's one for Obama :)
[A]: Non-threat


[Q]: Comment: I think I'll wait for second reading, where meaning and intentions clarify, and text sometimes changes.

What you say may be right, and it may impact on civil rights and be found unconstitutional.  There's still a difference between that and police state legislation or similar to 1937 Germany, which - you may recall - was my initial point on this thread.   Less due process is an attribute of police states, but it's also an attribute of democracies that sometimes go too far.  I'm more concerned about carding, for instance, but I still don't consider Toronto police to be Brown Shirt thugs.
[A]:
Non-threat