Given a document and an entity the task is to select the author's sentiment towards the entity. Sentiments can be Positive, Neutral and Negative. Select Positive if the article expresses a positive view towards the given entity or praises its quality or skills. Select Neutral if the document expresses no clear view towards the entity or has equal amounts of positive and negative statements or expressing some fact/quote by someone else. Select Negative if the article expresses a negative view towards like harsh remarks, criticizing entities action/decision etc. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

Input: Consider Input: What is the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Bernie Sanders ? Ashton seems to have learned the right lessons from that debacle , has taken inspiration from the insurgent , unapologetically progressive campaigns of Bernie Sanders and Jeremy Corbyn , and hopes to both bring the NDP back to its left-wing roots and ride the same populist wave that propelled those two perennial afterthought backbenchers into the international spotlight .

Output: Positive


Input: Consider Input: What is the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Mark Zuckerberg ? The closest  Mark Zuckerberg  has come to directly addressing President Donald Trump in public was when  he  wrote that "progress does not move in a straight line" the day after the election in November.
Since then   Zuckerberg  has embarked on  his  own tour of the U.S. that's been compared to a presidential campaign and sparked rumors that the Facebook CEO is considering a 2020 run.
While  Zuckerberg  has been shy to publicly address Trump   he  has in fact spoken with the president multiple times by phone since the election  Business Insider has learned.  Zuckerberg  revealed that  he 's talked with Trump during a surprise dinner with the Moore family in Newton  Ohio two weeks ago.
Exactly what  Zuckerberg  and Trump discussed is unclear —  Zuckerberg  didn't say during  his  dinner with the Ohio family and  his  spokesperson declined to comment. But the discussions show that the Facebook billionaire has held a dialogue with Trump even as  he  publicly opposes policies like Trump's first executive order on immigration. The White House didn't return a request for comment.
 Zuckerberg  and Facebook's relationship with Trump is complicated. Facebook was widely criticized in the wake of the election for its role in the proliferation of so-called fake news  which many believed help Trump win the election.  Zuckerberg  has called that notion "pretty crazy " but Facebook has made significant strides to eradicate fake news stories from its platform.
When Trump called together the tech industry's top leaders for a meeting of the minds in December  Facebook COO Sheryl Sandberg went instead of  Zuckerberg . Before Trump was elected   Zuckerberg  had come to the defense of the Facebook board member and Trump advisor who organized that same meeting with tech leaders  Peter Thiel.
"We care deeply about diversity "  Zuckerberg  wrote in an internal memo to Facebook employees that was leaked in October. "That's easy to say when it means standing up for ideas you agree with. It's a lot harder when it means standing up for the rights of people with different viewpoints to say what they care about. That's even more important."

Output: Positive


Input: Consider Input: What is the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Xie Zhenhua ? "The best result of the global climate talks may be a solution that dissatisfies every one but is accepted by all " he said. "To reach the result  every party needs compromise and work to find the biggest common ground. If one country refuses to do anything and ask others to do many  this is definitely not acceptable."
 When asked about one of the most controversial issue on how to manage the fast start fund  Xie said  as a developing country  China is fully qualified to receive funds and technical supports from developed countries.
 "But  provided that the amount of current fast start fund is much less than what developing countries need  China would not compete with those who need the money most such as the least developing countries and island countries " he said.
 Countries like China can do a great deal  and have made very clear that they intend to do a great deal  he told reporters.
 "It (China) has made commitment that was made on a series of actions on intensity  on renewable energy and on forests that are examples of what a really powerful country with enormous commitment can deliver " he said.
 Xie Zhenhua said China will also provide as much assistance to these countries as it is able to  through South-South cooperation.
 "We are not only saying it but have also begun doing it. In the past few years  we have provided training programs to people from least developed countries and worked with them in programs to cope with climate changes " Xie said.
 However  Xie strongly argued that developed countries should actually add new money in the fast start fund as a majority of current identified fast start fund was in fact included in the existing Official Development Assistance (ODA).
 "I think it is very very odd to have a negotiating process when you reach an agreement and a day after the agreement is done  you dismiss it as irrelevant. We don't think that's fair " he said.
 "So just for climate change  we made a commitment almost double all of the world's assistance. So an enormous commitment was made in Copenhagen  and I think no one seemed that " he said.
 Commenting on the idea of a new way outside the United Nations raised by the United States  Xie said China will stick to the principle of reaching consensus through broad consultation.
 The U.S. proposal of small group discussions where decisions are made by some major countries will not be accepted by a majority of countries  though the current UN talks do face the problem of low efficiency  he said.
 "We think that small group discussions can supplement the UN talks " he said.
 China suggested to hold minister-level talks of some representative countries where they can close the difference at the UN talks and reach common understanding. The results of such talks can be brought back to the UN talks and speed up the broad consultation  he said.
 "We should learn the lesson from the Copenhagen Accord reached after negotiations by some countries while many others did not think they participate in the consultation and refused to accept it " he said.


Output: Positive