Given the Question and Answer pair, detect whether the answer is acceptable or not. Denote acceptable answer as "yes", otherwise denote as "no". An acceptable answer is consistent with the context in question, detailed, long, and uses general knowledge of English. Answers that are not definite and suggest a variety of options are not acceptable answers.

Question: I've seen many people who say: This is a HTML page. Yet I've also seen many people who say: This is an HTML page. Are both usages equally correct? Or, which is the grammatically correct one? Possible Duplicates: "A" vs. "An" in writing vs. pronunciation Do you use "a" or "an" before acronyms? 
Answer: "H" stands for "hyper..." ; the "h" of all the words starting by hyper is never aspirated (an hyperbol, etc.). Then : an HTML.
no

Question: Possible Duplicate: How should I punctuate around quotes? When should end punctuation go inside quotes? Or is it region specific? I was always taught that when ending a quotation, that punctuation remains inside of the quote. I think he said, "we should go to the store." Are you sure he said, "we should go to the store?" As opposed to: I think he said, "we should go to the store". Are you sure he said, "we should go to the store"? This is just an arbitrary example off of the top of my head, and it's hard for me to come up with an example for the second usage because it looks completely wrong to me. I actually got into a small argument with my girlfriend earlier this year because she uses something similar to the second example, and said that's how she was taught (which is why I ask if it's region-specific.) Anyway, is there a correct usage for ending a quotation with punctuation? 
Answer: In American English, commas and periods go inside the quotation marks. Semi-colons, question marks and exclamation marks go inside the quotation marks only if they're part of the quotation. E.g., "What time is it?" he asked. Did he really say, "I don't care"? So your example should be the following: I think he said, "we should go to the store." Are you sure he said, "we should go to the store"?.
yes

Question: "The worst student" is the student who is bad at things. In this case, "worst" simply describes the noun. Following this logic, your "worst enemy" would be the person who is very bad at being your enemy, thus is actually your best friend. Your "worst enemy" is actually the enemy who is very good at being your enemy. Thus, in this context, "worst" acts to amplify the inherent negative intent of the noun. "Worst disaster" would be another example of this. Is this just a matter of context or there some science behind the interprettation of a negative adjective applied to a negative noun? 
Answer: The meaning is often seeming obvious and clear, but is contextual rather than strictly logical, and can be subjective and up to the speaker to decide and to communicate effectively. To use your example, "worst" in "the worst student" doesn't necessarily "simply describe the noun". e.g. it could be either something like: "Ralph was the worst student this term, attending only half the classes and failing the test." (i.e. he was worst at the class requirements) or "Of all the ill-mannered students, Jason was the worst student Mathilda had ever encountered." (i.e. Jason was the worst behaved) A clearer example of this possibility might be: "Sam received a bad blow to the face." (it's bad because the speaker sympathizes with Sam) vs. "Bob landed a good blow on the monster's wing." (it's good because the speaker is siding with Bob).

no