We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Example Input: Sent1: People have been found out to be innocent after the death penalty ha already been carried out....
 Sent2: There has been so much cases of people who have been executed, only to be found innocent after their death.
Example Output: Similar

Example Input: Sent1: I'm not saying that a child's life is worth more than an adults, I'm saying if they killed any one they forfeit their life, because they in return lose what they took from someone else.
 Sent2: Like I said, if the person isn't convicted, then they will not be murdered in the electric chair, or by lethal injection.
Example Output: Not similar

Example Input: Sent1: I think the death penalty should only be used when there is undeniable proof against the suspect.
 Sent2: I don't think everyone should be put to death.
Example Output:
Similar