In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence can be inferred from the statement. Incorrect choices change the meaning in important ways or have details that are not mentioned in the statement. Indicate your answer as 1,2, or 3 corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.

Input: Consider Input: Statement: In order to facilitate the ability of the participants to work from an agreed upon set of facts about themselves, the facilitators divided the conferees into three groups. Choices:  1. The facilitators broke the people up into three groups. 2. The facilitators broke the people up into seven groups. 3. The facilitators broke the people up into three groups at the conference.

Output: 1


Input: Consider Input: Statement: piece crudely indicts the entire Serb nation (they didn't need to load Kosovars into boxcars to look bad). Choices:  1. The Serb nation was not indicted at all in the piece. 2. The entire Serb nation is cruelly indicted in the piece. 3. The Serb nation has never been indicted in other pieces before.

Output: 2


Input: Consider Input: Statement: As a share of GDP, federal taxes have been roughly stable under Clinton. Choices:  1. Under Clinton, federal taxes, as far as GDP shares go, have been more or less stable. 2. The reason for this is because Clinton's policies have been rather consistent. 3. Under Clinton, federal taxes have been remarkably volatile as a share of GDP.


Output: 1