Categorize the comment on the basis of toxicity. If the comment is toxic (harmful, malicious, derogatory, threat, insult, identity attck, etc.) output Yes, otherwise output No.

[EX Q]: Unlike Sen. Mark Kirk (R-IL, who issued a statement saying he would not back his party’s nominee for president:

I have spent my life building bridges and tearing down barriers–not building walls. That’s why I find Donald Trump’s belief that an American-born judge of Mexican descent is incapable of fairly presiding over his case is not only dead wrong, it is un-American…

It is absolutely essential that we are guided by a commander-in-chief with a responsible and proper temperament, discretion and judgment. Our President must be fit to command the most powerful military the world has ever seen, including an arsenal of thousands of nuclear weapons. After much consideration, I have concluded that Donald Trump has not demonstrated the temperament necessary to assume the greatest office in the world."
[EX A]: No

[EX Q]: Alaska needs to find a way to get more companies drilling and stop the harshness of the state oil and gas agencies that have run smaller competitors out in favor of the majors! 

Now the majors have laid off so many Alaskans maybe the state will stop running the smaller companies out with bad rulings! Alaska will need oil jobs and more oil fast! 

Look at the UK; http://www.rigzone.com/news/
[EX A]: No

[EX Q]: These punks need a good beating, and then to be dragged back across the border by their hair...
[EX A]:
Yes