Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.

Isn't it ironic how butt-hurt some white men get when there is a story honoring the contributions of a group that they are not a part of.  I wonder if they ever stop and think, "Maybe this this how African Americans feel all the time".  It should also be noted that these are the same folks who rally against political correctness and hypersensitivity. On average, I would say white men are the most hypersensitive, easily-offended demographic in America.
Yes

But that's not what Bernie wants to do. He loves regulating businesses and hates markets and competition. He wants to bar the federal reserve from raising interest rates if unemployment is above 4%, which means more free money for the biggest players. He also wants to raise my taxes and everybody else's by a hell of a lot. 

The middle class will be taxed heavily to pay for his trillions in "free" stuff, and you cannot deny that.
No

We have here a story with a minimum of information and yet posters project their own world views on the situation to determine that the "the cost effective route to keeping society safe from these creeps is execution.. tough love."  So we see that with almost no information we are willing to consign an individual to death.  If indeed that man has a long history of actual abuse of children or others, he should have offending organs surgically removed.  Resulting altered hormone levels may allow his effective integration into society.  

We are told that sexual orientation is hard wired.  So it is useless to call offenders creeps.  On the other hand, rewiring the hardware could alter behavior.  More productive.

Yes