Given the Question and Answer pair, detect whether the answer is acceptable or not. Denote acceptable answer as "yes", otherwise denote as "no". An acceptable answer is consistent with the context in question, detailed, long, and uses general knowledge of English. Answers that are not definite and suggest a variety of options are not acceptable answers.
--------
Question: Question: I am creating a computer game in which the character needs to consume food in order to not starve to death. In the game I can display the level of how much food the character currently needs via "hunger level" - the higher this value, the more desperately the character needs food. But what I want now is to turn that around, so that this level tells how full the stomach of the character is. In German we have a word for that, "Sattigung", which means how full my stomach is (or better: how full it feels to me), it is basically the opposite of hunger. Is there a similar word in English, which means exactly that, the opposite of hunger? It might be something like "saturation", but from what I can tell this word is usually used in a technical context, like in "the saturation of a color". Can I use that "saturation" to describe the opposite of hunger of a human or animal, or is there a better word for that? 
Answer: I think the apter word is 'satiety' than 'saturation' in the OP's context. satiety thestateof beingcompletely satisfied,especiallywithfoodor pleasure, so that you could not have any more.

Answer: yes


Question: Question: Possible Duplicate: Which is the proper spelling: "disfunction" or "dysfunction"? What's the rationale behind dysfunctional being spelled dys- and not dis-? 
Answer: From WordReference.com on Dysfunction vs. Disfunction: dys- is a Greek prefix meaning "bad", "abnormal", "difficult", or "impaired". dis- is a Latin prefix with none of the above meanings. dys- has the right meaning, but function is a Latin word. Hence the confusion. Latin dis- can mean "lack of", "not", "opposite of", "away from". This all explains why something dys-functional has a bad or abnormal function, rather than a lack of function that dis-functional implies.

Answer: yes


Question: Question: Is there a word which has this definition: usage of vulgar or abusive words too often especially while chatting or talking to someone or while giving a speech. What do you call a person who uses abusive words too often without needing to. 
Answer: Two excellent choices exist. The first can be used as either an adjective or noun, in slightly different forms: foulmouth, adj. and n. B. n. A foul-mouthed person. ["foulmouth, adj. and n.". OED Online. June 2016. Oxford University Press. (accessed August 21, 2016).] The adjective 'foulmouth' is obsolete in that form. Instead, the current version is 'foulmouthed': foul-mouthed, adj. Of persons and their utterances: Using obscene, profane, or scurrilous language. ["foul-mouthed, adj.". OED Online. June 2016. Oxford University Press. (accessed August 21, 2016).] The second choice is not so commonly used, and is only found as a noun. However, there's no mistaking its meaning: muck-spout n. regional and slang a person who uses obscene or foul language. ["muck, n.1". OED Online. June 2016. Oxford University Press. (accessed August 21, 2016).].

Answer:
yes