In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Input: Consider Input: Comment: Perhaps the church would have been able to prevent this, had it not lost any claim to moral authority when it enthusiastically supported the rape of children in Malta by clergy?

Output: Sexual-explicit


Input: Consider Input: Comment: I posted the same comment on the Broomfield fracking mess, applies here also 

What is the continually last century type argument stating that research must prove harm before we act? How about we study the area get baseline readings and any changes due to industry are required to be rectified, air, water, sound etc. Why are we experimenting on our families and neighbors? Should we have people drink extreme amounts of molybdenum and find out 40 years later it harmed them? Why? Its cruel and ignorant.

Output: Non-sexual-explicit


Input: Consider Input: Comment: Aww, cry me a river. My comment was squarely aimed at those whose poor life decision put them in a bad way, not those with a legitimate health problem or other situation. I stand by my "cold, cold" comment, as would anyone else that has worked their ass off their entire life for everything they have. The PFD is a nice supplement to income, sure, but if you rely on it, you did something wrong in life to do so.


Output: Sexual-explicit