We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

[Q]: Sent1: The fact remains that life in prison is cheaper than sentencing one to the death penalty.
 Sent2: Without the trials and appeals, death penalty cases would be much cheaper than confining inmates for the rest of their lives.
[A]: Not similar


[Q]: Sent1: The death penalty doesn't reverse the death of the victim.
 Sent2: What does this have to do with the death penalty?
[A]: Not similar


[Q]: Sent1: I don't even give a shit about the death penalty, I was just making a point.
 Sent2: Like I said, I don't disagree with the theory of the death penalty.
[A]:
Not similar