We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Input: Consider Input: Sent1: If it must be, then we shall find a way to improve these peoples habits, not kill them because they aren't 'like us'.
 Sent2: save the money...feed starving children and free this "bad guy"...let the families find them...kill him for us for free!

Output: Not similar


Input: Consider Input: Sent1: The comparison is no bridge to the death penalty, however, because there is nothing gained by seeing a person fried to death as opposed to seeing them fade away in a prison cell for the rest of their life.
 Sent2: For some people death penalty is better than life in prison, who are respect their freedom and who are consider that it is better to die than someone to judge them.

Output: Not similar


Input: Consider Input: Sent1: Death penalty should be allowed as it deters people from committing serious crimes such as murder.
 Sent2: Death penalty are given to those who have comitted a very serious crime.


Output: Not similar