TASK DEFINITION: Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
PROBLEM: Unless your one of those with a straw at the public trough, you are certainly no better off today than you were 8-9 years ago. Obama was less qualified to answer the call than any of the crop offered up this season. Hillary offers up what ever is appropriate for the audience she is addressing, often in conflict with the next stop, i.e. She is an issue whore. Bernie is in only as a planted transition player for the ultimate socialism play by the party. 
Trump would be at least entertaining and maybe, just maybe a dagger in both establishment parties that have been playing the people for years. Quit being a sucker people, $9 billion for an election? That's why the establishment is freaking out, they are losing control of and the $$$$$'s. It's a rip and it's time time say enough.

SOLUTION: Yes

PROBLEM: Trump would be a disaster, but this letter sounds just like how some on the right talk about Obama as emperor, ruling by executive order.

SOLUTION: Yes

PROBLEM: Not legally you haven't. You can get away with smoking in these places but if you get caught you could receive a civil fine.

Mainly, it's dumb to make a product legal but provide nowhere  to consume it.

SOLUTION:
Yes