In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: threat and non-threat. Threat is a statement that someone will be hurt or harmed, especially if the person does not do something in particular.

[EX Q]: Comment: "Hillary Clinton although she is a dishonest, corrupt, secretly pro-Wall Street, establishment plutocrat."

After all we've seen from Donald Trump after only six months in office you have the gall to say that about Hillary Clinton?!?!  The level of denial among you Trumpsters is really too, too much.
[EX A]: Non-threat

[EX Q]: Comment: Vancouver was thinking it was a good idea to pass a law mandating snow tires-  but only if there was snow on the ground? 

How on earth was that law going to be enforced? Who was going to enforce it? How were people going to comply? Check the weather then break out the jack?

Two questions arise in my mind- 

1- Did the author completely miss the actual wording of the proposed law? Because surely a law like that could not have actually been proposed, right? 

2- If the author's research was accurate, it beggars the question: How do people that stupid actually get elected?
[EX A]: Non-threat

[EX Q]: Comment: That was Donald Trump and his billionaire friends sending the jobs to China.  Until last year, Trump's products were made in China, Vietnam, Turkey and Bangladesh.  The right wingers outsource as profits trump patriotism.
[EX A]:
Non-threat