In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Q: Comment: So, we create a crap shoot lottery to fund education? Along with closing 1-2 Pioneer Homes (to save money) and throwing seniors out on the street, if I as I suspect many have no place else to go? All to protect the wealthy from paying into a balanced an progressive tax plan?  Is this truly the kind of state we as a collective wish to create? How much lower can our Republican lead Senate drop to? 

I have no kids to educate nor do I have any family or anyone I know living in a Pioneer Home (so I have no stake in this), but I do know that I am willing to pay into a progressive income and/or sales tax within a balanced plan to insure that seniors are housed and that your kids are educated. 

This is about creating a common sense, responsible, balanced, and compassionate Alaskan society for all, not an everyone for themselves, statewide dystopia. 

This is not fiscal responsibility; this is fiscal idiocy.

A: Obscene
****
Q: Comment: You triggered a memory of a Washington Post magazine article of a man in suburban WDC who had his whole house wired to hear Rush Limbaugh in every room around the clock.  And he was "a devout Catholic!"
You'd think if he was "a devout Catholic" he might have the house wired to hear the gospel in every room around the clock.   But, no!
He got more of a rush from Limbaugh than the gospel, eh?

A: Non-obscene
****
Q: Comment: I will never fall for this crap.  I will never wear a hijab in solidarity for religion that wants to see me dead.  I will wear that hijab until the Muslims have a reformation of their faith and change their Koran to reflect normal values

A:
Obscene
****