In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Q: Comment: Obama traded 5 high level terrorists for this traitor.

A: Non-sexual-explicit
****
Q: Comment: Wow! If you think this article represents "common sense truth seeking" you really need to go back to the drawing board. This woman is a dishonest extremist who trades in propagandist lies.

A: Non-sexual-explicit
****
Q: Comment: "Wow, your breasts are really nice, let me just take off your shirt so I can look at how great they are! Don't worry, I'm not a perv, I just find them interesting." 

That is what you sound like. 

Nobody is saying a nurse is a perv for touching patients when they need to for their jobs. The issue is that these nurses were not looking at this man's genitals for medical purposes. They were doing it because they wanted to, to satisfy a personal desire. The article is not, "Nurses open body bag to examine strange growths on a patient's genitals" or something along those lines. This is not a case of medical intrigue, what it is, is a case of nurses using their position to take advantage of a patient - dead or alive. Curiosity is not an excuse. 

Also, I would rather that patients feel safe enough to seek medical care for themselves and their children rather than fearing deportation for simply going to a doctor. I value human life more than I am concerned about illegal immigration.

A:
Sexual-explicit
****