In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: threat and non-threat. Threat is a statement that someone will be hurt or harmed, especially if the person does not do something in particular.

Ex Input:
Comment: Insurance companies add no value to this.  They're just parasites.  The problem with the ACA is that it made the parasites the most important player.  In 2013 the Aetna CEO made $30 million...for example.

Get costs under control.  Implement a universal system.  Pay for it with a flat percentage tax on ALL income, including capital gains, etc.

Ex Output:
Non-threat


Ex Input:
Comment: I find those who chant do so because they either have such a slim argument that they don't want to be drawn into it, or because they lack the mental prowess to mount their argument in a rational manner.  It is for that reason that the "Lock her up," chant is offensive.  

I should point out too that the main perpetrators of the chanting phenomenon are unionists, "Hey, Hey  Ho, Ho.  Fill-in-the-blank has got to go!"   Clever eh?   The "progressives" particularly the enviro-nuts, are no better,  “U.G.L.Y.  Corporate scum you cheat you lie.  You UGLY, uh, uh, you UGLY.”   That intellectual gem and many others are found on the website tarsandsblockade.org

Chanting has no place in rational debate, none.

Ex Output:
Non-threat


Ex Input:
Comment: It would be like celebrating election success under corrupt Tammany Hall in NYC.  Voter suppression, lost ballots, and citizens refused their right to vote have no place in American politics.

Ex Output:

Non-threat