Categorize the comment on the basis of toxicity. If the comment is toxic (harmful, malicious, derogatory, threat, insult, identity attck, etc.) output Yes, otherwise output No.

Let the Bernie supporters kiss Trump's middle finger.  Haha
Yes

Larry, your historical research is lacking on this. Study the Republican administrations of the 1920s, for example -- as well as earlier -- and you'll find no (or very little) support for your assertions that Republicans believed that government needs to be large enough to ensure every citizen has a decent standard of living. They had other reasons for favoring a strong central government, but they had very little (if any) concern for the livelihoods of ordinary citizens. William Leuchtenberg's new (huge!) volume titled The American Presidency: From Teddy Roosevelt to Bill Clinton will give you a good overview, if you're interested. You're right that the Democrats changed in the 1930s, but they weren't switching places with Republicans (not at that point, that happened much later).
No

I can see why comments taper off when you two guys appear with you comments. Neither of you has the remotest idea what you are talking about. Those damns are a spit in the ocean in terms of the electricity they generate. They were build to electrify the Rogue Valley in the early 20th century and have long outlived their usefulness. As the editorial writer says, the region is awash in surplus hydro from the Columbia River damns since the aluminum industry closed down. The region's utilities has been closing nuclear and fossil fuel plants because they are necessary. Do a bit of homework guys, before shooting off...your comments. You won't sound so foolish.

Yes