In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Comment: Your damn right it is sad who are the traitors and liars that run these papers. I used to love and admire the globe no goddamn longer that's for sure. Nothing but bias . I am really worried Muslims and communists are going to overrun this great nation with help from Justin Trudeau and his band of merry Ho Ho's. Liberals are no longer the reasonable people they used to be . Stand up Canada .Before it is too late . Hoist a weapon if you have to but lets get rid of this politically correct band of rich zealots parading new world order under disguise of tolerance.
Obscene

Comment: No one knows how to gauge te outcome based on the ranked ballot.  But isn't the challenge greater than that?   
Each EDA counts as 100 points and the first candidate to get 16901 points, or more, is the winner.  This means that EDA's with a small number of members carry a lot of weight.  If one candidate has 28% support concentrated in many EDA's with few members, that candidate ha a much better chance than another candidate with 35% support concentrated in a few ridings in the GTA.
This is the same approach the Liberals used to choose Justin Trudeau.  Apparently, he had broad support getting over 80% of the points on the first round.  This time around, it seems like a real crap shoot.
Obscene

Comment: You have the freedom to hate America all you want Danny.  Hate on bro.

Non-obscene