In this task, you're given a statement, and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence clearly disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3' corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.

[Q]: Statement: For example, if the analysis indicated that the maximum feasible level for 1998 was at or closer to one of the lower prior year standards than it was to the 1997 standard, prescribing that lower standard would not necessarily be impermissible. Choices:  1. if the analysis indicated that the maximum level was lower prior to last years standards prescribing that lower standard would be impermissible. 2. The maximum level for 1998 was lower than the previous years. 3. if the analysis indicated that the maximum level was lower prior to last years standards prescribing that lower standard would not necessarily be impermissible.
[A]: 1


[Q]: Statement: Following the CEOas lead, members of the senior executive team learn to value the advice of the CIO in setting business directions and developing strategies for improving organizational capabilities and competitiveness. Choices:  1. The CIO does not have any responsibilities to provide advice. 2. The CIO provides advice about developing strategies and improving capabilities. 3. Most of the CIOs ideas are bad and will harm the company.
[A]: 1


[Q]: Statement: When that happens, Democrats will be bound to escalate the confirmation battle once more, to settle their score with Hatch. Choices:  1. There is a score to be settled between Democrats and Hatch. 2. When it happens, the Democrats won't try to settle the score with Hatch.  3. When it happens, the Democrats will make the confirmation battle their first priority so that they can get even with Hatch. 
[A]:
2