Given a passage classify if the passage has a definite objective/aim/goal or not. Output '1' if the passage has a defininte objective/aim/goal and output '0' if the passage does not have a definite objective/aim/goal.

[EX Q]: Environmental ozone can rapidly degrade cyanine 5 (Cy5), a fluorescent dye commonly used in microarray gene expression studies. Cyanine 3 (Cy3) is much less affected by atmospheric ozone. Degradation of the Cy5 signal relative to the Cy3 signal in 2-color microarrays will adversely reduce the Cy5/Cy3 ratio resulting in unreliable microarray data.', 'Ozone in central Arkansas typically ranges between approximately 22 ppb to approximately 46 ppb and can be as high as 60-100 ppb depending upon season, meteorological conditions, and time of day. These levels of ozone are common in many areas of the country during the summer. A carbon filter was installed in the laboratory air handling system to reduce ozone levels in the microarray laboratory. In addition, the airflow was balanced to prevent non-filtered air from entering the laboratory. These modifications reduced the ozone within the microarray laboratory to approximately 2-4 ppb. Data presented here document reductions in Cy5 signal on both in-house produced microarrays and commercial microarrays as a result of exposure to unfiltered air. Comparisons of identically hybridized microarrays exposed to either carbon-filtered or unfiltered air demonstrated the protective effect of carbon-filtration on microarray data as indicated by Cy5 and Cy3 intensities. LOWESS normalization of the data was not able to completely overcome the effect of ozone-induced reduction of Cy5 signal. Experiments were also conducted to examine the effects of high humidity on microarray quality. Modest, but significant, increases in Cy5 and Cy3 signal intensities were observed after 2 or 4 hours at 98-99% humidity compared to 42% humidity.
[EX A]: 0

[EX Q]: Controversy has surrounded the technique of circular stapled anopexy since an isolated report of a high incidence of persistent postdefaecation pain following the procedure. The characteristics, clinical course and management of this complication have not been described.', 'Within an ongoing multicentre randomized clinical trial comparing circular stapled anopexy with closed haemorrhoidectomy, 77 patients underwent circular stapled anopexy. Follow-up was at 6, 12, 24 and 48 weeks. Patients underwent transanal ultrasonography, anal electrosensitivity testing and manometry.', 'Of the 77 patients who had circular stapled anopexy, three men reported new-onset postdefaecation pain that compromised lifestyle, including ability to return to work. All three had sphincter hypertonicity on digital and manometric examination but were refractory to topical 0.2 per cent glyceryl trinitrate ointment. The addition of oral nifedipine 20 mg twice daily did not alter anal sphincter pressures but rapidly abolished symptoms and restored quality of life.
[EX A]: 0

[EX Q]: To determine the effect of suppression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) by monthly injection of ranibizumab on posterior retinal nonperfusion (RNP) in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME).', 'Unplanned retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from 2 randomized, sham injection-controlled, double-masked, multicenter clinical trials.', 'Six hundred sixty-six patients with DME.', 'An independent reading center measured the area of RNP on fluorescein angiograms obtained in the phase 3 RISE and RIDE trials.', 'The percentage of patients with no posterior RNP.', 'The percentage of patients with no posterior RNP decreased in the sham group between baseline and month 24, but remained relatively stable in the 2 ranibizumab groups. After month 24, the sham group crossed over to receive monthly injections of ranibizumab 0.5 mg, and the differences between the sham and ranibizumab groups were reduced. The percentage of patients who showed an increase in posterior RNP from baseline increased over time in all 3 groups, but at a faster rate in the sham group, resulting in statistically significant differences at every time point between months 3 (9.6% vs. 18.5%; P = 0.016) and 24 (16.1% vs. 37.6%; P<0.0001) for ranibizumab 0.5 mg versus sham and from months 6 (12.3% vs. 23.0%; P = 0.013) through 24 (15.0% vs. 37.6%; P<0.0001) for ranibizumab 0.3 mg. Initiation of ranibizumab in the sham group at month 24 was followed by reduction in the percentage of patients with an increase in posterior RNP from baseline at months 30 and 36, whereas the 2 ranibizumab groups continued their gradual rise.
[EX A]:
1