In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

Q: Comment: The economy has been on a record upswing, building the Permanent Fund to where it is today ... and sooner or later, it will fall into a record downswing.  There may be no Permanent Fund earnings for some years to come, it may even lose over half of its value ... and then what?  The fund lost 3 billion in January, but was rescued in a temporary market correction.  Our legislators are foolish children, playing with fire ... and it is the people who will get burned.  On top of that, the fund lost two of the most competent managers it has ever had, who had overseen the biggest single growth in the history of the fund ... all because the legislators saved a few pennies by not giving them a decent raise or bonus.

A: Non-identity-attack
****
Q: Comment: Twittler had a string of 5 juvenile tweets attacking Corker this morning. Our national embarrassment continues.

A: Non-identity-attack
****
Q: Comment: I'm still trying to understand the phrase " change the narrative ". Whose narrative?—2Be4Peace  The narrative is that Blacks are interlopers.  Changing the narrative means that the American Dream and the American Dilemma are two aspects of the same reality.  Dealing with this reality demands that truth determine racial politics, rather than racial politics determine truth.  When Blacks are assumed to be real Americans in the United States, the narrative changes and everyone else is also included.  When Blacks are excluded, no one else is risk free.

A:
Identity-attack
****