In this task, you will be presented with a context from an academic paper and a question separated with a 
. You have to answer the question based on the context.

Ex Input:
Above all, we introduce two common baselines. The first one just selects the leading sentences to form a summary. It is often used as an official baseline of DUC, and we name it “LEAD”. The other system is called “QUERY_SIM”, which directly ranks sentences according to its TF-IDF cosine similarity to the query. Above all, we introduce two common baselines. The first one just selects the leading sentences to form a summary. It is often used as an official baseline of DUC, and we name it “LEAD”. The other system is called “QUERY_SIM”, which directly ranks sentences according to its TF-IDF cosine similarity to the query. In addition, we implement two popular extractive query-focused summarization methods, called MultiMR BIBREF2 and SVR BIBREF20 . Since our model is totally data-driven, we introduce a recent summarization system DocEmb BIBREF9 that also just use deep neural network features to rank sentences. To verify the effectiveness of the joint model, we design a baseline called ISOLATION, which performs saliency ranking and relevance ranking in isolation. 
 Question: What models do they compare to?

Ex Output:
LEAD QUERY_SIM MultiMR SVR DocEmb ISOLATION


Ex Input:
Table TABREF20 shows that, on WoZ and DSTC2 datasets, SIM model has the same number of parameters, which is only 23% and 19% of that in GLAD model. 
 Question: How do they measure model size?

Ex Output:
By the number of parameters.


Ex Input:
We choose the state-of-the-art Transformer BIBREF1 model and the conventional RNN-Search model BIBREF0 as our test bed. 
 Question: Which model architectures do they test their word importance approach on?

Ex Output:

 Transformer BIBREF1 model and the conventional RNN-Search model BIBREF0