We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Example Input: Sent1: You argue that the ban worked, yet at the same time you claim that gun makers found a way around the law, releasing the same weapons as before but in a way that made them technically legal.
 Sent2: Which gun right laws do you support?The right to ban them?you are as anti-gun as they come.Galileo no offense, because you make no pretense about it.
Example Output: Not similar

Example Input: Sent1: I like guns as much as the normal person does but if guns are abused by people, we need restictions.
 Sent2: I also say that when people commit a crime with a gun these people need to be punished not the law-abiding citizens!
Example Output: Not similar

Example Input: Sent1: You can't just claim "Country A has more gun control and a lower homicide rate than Country B does" and leave it at that.
 Sent2: states with higher rates of household firearm ownership had significantly higher homicide victimization rates for children, and for women and men.States With Higher Levels Of Gun Ownership Have Higher Homicide Rates
Example Output:
Not similar