The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.
--------
Question: Context: 'I can give out the food in exchange for the firewood' 'Okay. I need all of the water, if you're getting the firewood. ' 'I can't give out all the water. I need to be hydrated as well. '
Utterance: 'You already have all the basics, though, so you won't lack sufficient water to be hydrated. I have a serious medical condition that requires that I have access to additional water. '

Answer: No


Question: Context: 'yes I could use some extra food since i am hiking with my kids and they all have a friend that comes along...lol' 'I know how that goes...We are planning on hiking too and we could also use some extra food.' 'well I am sure between you and me we will find a way....'
Utterance: 'I really need some food, but I could also use extra firewood. It is supposed to be pretty cold at night and we would love to cook up some smores.'

Answer: Yes


Question: Context: 'Actually that does sound a lot better I would be willing to do that. So 2 firewood for 3 water?' 'Yea but what about the food?' 'Oh right, how about you get 3 waters , 2 food and 0 firewood. And I'll get 3 firewood and 1 food?'
Utterance: 'That sounds like a good deal to me 🙂'

Answer:
No