In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

Q: Comment: How about being black? Are you fine with that? Something tells me deep down you are not.

A: Identity-attack
****
Q: Comment: Milo is an openly gay man purports to be a Catholic and does part of his hate routine in drag.  The Cardinal Newman Foundation should have itself in vapors if such a character comes to a Catholic university.   Milo might corrupt the students and turn them gay.

A: Identity-attack
****
Q: Comment: She was a "deeply flawed person" because of her actions and her choices - private email servers and more than 33,000 deleted emails; allowing American embassy personnel (including the ambassador himself!) to be viciously murdered in Benghazi, despite their repeated requests for more security; decades of controversy and investigations tied to her and her husband.

But more seriously, she was "deeply flawed" because of her political positions: pro-choice, pro-late term abortion, pro-gay "marriage", pro-Obamacare, pro-embryonic stem cell research, pro-tax, anti-religious liberty, anti-Catholic, anti-free market, anti-business...she would have continued the trend of pushing this nation and its citizens to the extreme political left, all the while demeaning and insulting those who disagreed with her ("deplorables") and never once trying to persuade, just use the power of government to coerce and impose.

Her flaws had nothing to do with her gender, and everything to do with her character.

A:
Non-identity-attack
****