In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine the neutral choice based on your inference from the statement and your commonsense knowledge. The neutral choice is a sentence that neither agrees nor disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3', corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence. If sentence X agrees with sentence Y, one's correctness follows from the other one. If sentence X disagrees with sentence Y, they can not be correct at the same time.

[Q]: Statement: Of the 700,000 to 1 million people who are eligible for legal aid services in his combined area, Dudovitz estimated that he will serve more than 30,000 annually. Choices: 1. Dudovitz will serve over 30,000 people eligible for legal aid services in his area annually.   2. Dudovitz serves over 50,000 people eligible for legal aid services in his area annually. 3. The people eligible for legal aid services in Dudovitz's area that won't be served him will be served by others like him.
[A]: 3


[Q]: Statement: The bad  Lots of people might be killed in the process. Choices: 1. The worst thing is that we might be the ones to die, too. 2. Lots of people might be killed in the process - that's the bad thing. 3. There is nothing bad about this, it has only good sides.
[A]: 1


[Q]: Statement: As expected, scenario A has the largest increase with expenditures rising by nearly $17 billion in 2015 compared to the reference case. Choices: 1. The expenditures are largest in scenario A. 2. Scenario B is the most profitable. 3. Expenditures in scenario A decrease.
[A]:
2