The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the vouch-fair strategy, otherwise output No. vouch-fair is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to call out fairness for personal benefit, either when acknowledging a fair deal or when the opponent offers a deal that benefits them. This can be through an explicit call out or can be implied.
--------
Question: Context: 'Hey, I was thinking that I could take all of the food items, and 2 of the firewood items. My friend has low blood sugar and they need the food in case they crash, and the warmth of the fire to maintain at evening.' 'Water is my highest priority, what is yours? Is it food?' 'Yes, food is my highest. It's necessary for my friend to keep extra around just in case he crashes. Why is water your highest priority?'
Utterance: 'I need the water to drink - I don't trust the water I might find at the campsite.'

Answer: No


Question: Context: 'Hi! How about I receive 3 food, 2 firewood, and 1 water?' 'I can't do that. It would leave me with no food at all. How about I take 2 food, and 1 firewood, and 1 water?' 'I really need more food than 1. I am worried about running out. I could take 2 food, and give you 1 food, 2 firewood, and 2 water.'
Utterance: 'That is a very generous offer, which I very much appreciate. But I am also worried that I could run out. What if I take 2 foods, give you 2 firewoods, and 1 water?  '

Answer: Yes


Question: Context: 'I was hoping to get alot of water as well, would you be ok with me getting two waters and three firewoods if you get all the food and one water?' 'Hmm, that's not favorable for me going by the volume of items left in my arsenal. Water is more of a higher priority than food. So, I would exchange 1 pack of food for an additional water' 'So that way you would get two waters and two foods? Those are my priorities as well but i would be ok with it since that way i would get five items and you would get only four.'
Utterance: 'Those are your priorities?? Then that's not fair for you. Then I take 2 water, 1 firewood and 1 food. This is the lowest I can offer'

Answer:
Yes