In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.
--------
Question: Comment: Peeing in the park/alley when you think no one is looking is not an offense that requires registration as a sex offender in the State of Colorado. It does not meet the elements of Indecent Exposure, which requires a KNOWING exposure of genitals to the view of another person when done with the intent to arouse. It also does not meet the elements of Public Indecency (which only requires registration after a second conviction within 5 years), which requires a KNOWING exposure of genitals to the view of another person.

Also, the juvenile sex offender registry is not made available to the public in the same way as the adult sex offender registry. And first-time juvenile sex offenders are able to petition for de-registration once they have successfully completed their sentence.

Answer: Sexual-explicit


Question: Comment: Its funny watching the left twist themselves into knots defending religious views that literally oppress women.

This is why the left cannot be taken seriously on almost any matter. The same hypocrites who ranted and raved about Donald Trump were silent about Harvey Weinstein. They have marches and wear ribbons and talk about women’s rights and then say we have no right to step in when a religion oppresses women on what they can wear or do. 

Meanwhile if a Christian says women shouldn’t be allowed to have an abortion they go ape**** protest and riot saying and I quote “no one should be able to tell a woman what to do with her body”. How the F is this any different?

The selective and hypocritical morality of the left should be ignored as it is nonsensical and illogical. The ban should stand, otherwise what the law is saying is all religions are equal, except for islam which will get an exception every time. Thus the beginning of sharia law.

Answer: Non-sexual-explicit


Question: Comment: Need reliable evidence that they talked about gay oral sex in your daughter's class. Your word is not to be trusted. I'll believe that they talked about gay relationships, but I'm not inclined to believe that got into pornographic details. My guess is you use hyperbole to make your points, as you know of no other way. Oh, and cover your daughters eyes, ears, and groin area till she's 25. Judging by your comment, your daughter probably knows more than you regarding a wide range of subjects; but, sadly, children don't get to choose their parents.

Answer:
Sexual-explicit