Given a document, an entity and its sentiment towards the entity, verify if it is the correct sentiment towards the entity. Answer should be yes or no. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Koontz Jane Hawk is Negative . Jane  knows  her  husband didn't commit suicide but proving it has been a challenge.  She  uncovered an evil plot to brainwash people to commit horrific acts  but  her  attempt to destroy the villain behind everything came with a horrible cost.  She  no longer has  her  job at the FBI and is a wanted fugitive.  She  keeps  her  son stashed away to protect him.  Jane  now roams the country to derail the mastermind and his nefarious plans.
A beloved schoolteacher on leave due to migraines is the latest to fall under the vicious mind games. She has dreams of walking through fire  and one afternoon she sets her vehicle on fire and drives through a hotel lobby. A sheriff uncovers her journals and sees a woman crying for help. When  Jane  learns of the incident   she  knows the people  she 's trying to eliminate are responsible.  She  has already gone rogue  and knowing  her  son is safe   she  has nothing to lose by going after the culprits.
When one of  her  targets tells  her   "You're dead already. They'll all know about you in the whispering room "  Jane  knows  she  has to learn what  his  cryptic phrase means even though it obviously will be a trap to take  her  out of the picture.
 The character of Jane Hawk  is arguably the best character Koontz has created. Knowledge of "The Silent Corner" helps put some of the narrative in perspective  but it's not necessary to fall under the author's spell. It's clear that another story featuring  her  quest for ultimate justice is on the horizon  and hopefully there will be even more after that.
no

Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Team Trump is Neutral . As Hanson explains  using a document paid for by the Clinton campaign (the discredited Russian dossier)  the Obama administration engaged in an unprecedented abuse of power through the FISA courts as a means to spy on the  Trump  campaign  and  as we now know  this of course included actual wiretaps.
This brazen spying and the overall Russia hoax was almost certainly the âinsurance policyâ Strzok and Page discussed with McCabe in the event of an unlikely  Trump  victory.
But even if  Trump  had lost  that policy was still going to be used by President Hillary and  her  minions within the media and federal law enforcement as a bludgeon to personally destroy  Trump  as a Russian stooge â and by extension  to destroy his MAGA movement  which terrifies the political and media establishment even more than the Tea Party.
However   Trump  did win  and as we now know  almost immediately after this victory the âinsurance policyâ was given the green-light. The first wave of this insurance policy came in the form of unceasing leaks to the Deep Stateâs most reliable co-conspirators â a compliant media.
If they did not already know  it was through these illegal leaks that the media learned that the Obama administration had spied on  Team Trump  both during and after the election. Although they now regret reporting this fact  we know the media knew about Obamaâs spying because  time and again and again  the media gleefully reported the fact that the Obama administration had spied on  Team Trump  (these media reports are all documented in detail here).
You see  in their own fevered minds  the media seemed certain that if the public was told that  Trump âs collusion with the Russians was so serious  his  team had to be surveilled by federal law enforcement   his  presidency would be over even before it began. Hence  the insurance policy.
What the Deep State and its media collaborators did not count on  though  was  Trump .
On March 4  early on a Saturday morning   Trump  tweeted  âTerrible! Just found out that Obama had my âwires tappedâ in Trump Tower just before the victory. Nothing found. This is McCarthyism!â â and this tweet blew the #ReleaseTheMemo scandal wide open.
So soothed were media provincials by the velvet-lined bubbleâs reassurance that  Trump  had no chance of becoming president  they did not plan far enough about what to do if  Trump  won.
And so  after  Trump  did win  for two whole weeks  the media did something it had not done for eight years  albeit accidentally â told the truth about the Obama administrationâs unprecedented politicization of the surveillance state.
no

Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Sridevi Kapoor is Negative . A picture of  Bollywood actress Sridevi Kapoor  is put up outside  her  residence in Mumbai on Monday  following  her  death. (Punit Pranjpe/AFP/Getty Images)
The sudden and mysterious death of Sridevi Kapoor  a Bollywood superstar beloved to millions of Indians and a rare actor who bridged the culture gap between the North and the South  is absolutely a valid news story.
For my entire generation   Sridevi  was a cult figure.  She  began acting at the age of 4  and  her  films spanned multiple languages and roles.  Her  impeccable sense of comic timing and  her  willingness to experiment made  her  one of the pioneering women of Indian cinema. When  she  returned to the movies after taking a 15-year break   she  gamely took on the challenge that female actors face in a shamefully unequal industry â one where 50-year-old men romance young heroines in their 20s  but women upward of 30 get swiftly ousted from mainline roles.
But the way  her  death has been reported in our media  especially on television  is the very opposite of journalism.

no