In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Input: Consider Input: Comment: Being a Jerk is lauded because its a backlash against strangers deciding they get to police what others say, do, and think.  its a backlash against americanized westerners complaining about cultural appropriation when white people wear a kimono (cultural japanese aren't bothered by this) and similar behaviors.  Its a backlash against being fired and or harassed by those who are so certain they're on the right side of history if you refuse to make use of random nontraditional pronouns (outside of he/she/they and derivatives).  A backlash against people who think dragging someone through the social media wringer over a 50's pinup shirt is an appropriate response.

The professor deserves a reprimand and a healthy "what the fuck were you thinking" conversation  with their peers.  Termination isn't likely to do anything but cost money and instead of a thoughtless act, create an active antagonist to the behaviors the college hopes to instill.

Output: Non-sexual-explicit


Input: Consider Input: Comment: Except those priests who rape children.  They weren't, and aren't, so much shepherds as wolves preying upon the flock, often with the support of the hierarchy.  But, because they have been given magic powers by the bishop, and those magic powers cannot be removed, they remain priests of the Church even while committing vile acts condemned by all decent humans.

Output: Sexual-explicit


Input: Consider Input: Comment: '
…uh, no it's not going to fix anything.
It's the same idiotic move Reagan tried and,
….it failed then,
…just as it will fail again.
.
.
Resist Trump.
Resist Trumpism.
Back the impeachment of Trump.
.


Output: Non-sexual-explicit