We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

Ex Input:
A law-abiding gun nut who uses their gun in committing a crime, is a criminal, and not law-abiding.

Ex Output:
Valid


Ex Input:
Let me ask you a question if I might: How do you explain the 2nd Amendment phrase ���the right of the people���?

Ex Output:
Valid


Ex Input:
You don't know where the right to no feel threatened or the right to peace of mind comes from?

Ex Output:

Valid