In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: threat and non-threat. Threat is a statement that someone will be hurt or harmed, especially if the person does not do something in particular.

Q: Comment: He killed 2 Troopers !!!! Execute him,end of story !!!

A: Threat
****
Q: Comment: Yes, the IM law requires the Department to establish moose population objectives and the BOG approves.  In most cases, unrealistically high population objectives have been set that are unsustainable.  This is what one can expect from a BOG that is entirely hunters and hunting guides and a Department that is addicted to hunting license revenues.  The result is predictable: endless killing of bears and wolves while moose objectives are seldom reached.  And this is at a cost of over $ 1 million per year, and at a greater cost to keeping Alaska's wild ecosystems healthy.  We are allowing ourselves to be bamboozled by an inherently corrupt system that favors about 14% of the Alaskans that hunt, and its not even working for them.  Its time to "repeal, and replace" the IM law with a wildlife conservation policy that is scientifically based, preserves ecosystem health, and respects democratic principles.

A: Non-threat
****
Q: Comment: I appreciate Trump appealing to Kim's vanity by saying he would be "honoured" to meet with him. At first it seems inappropriate to use such a word in reference to this nut-bar tyrant but it is psychologically the right move to publicly give Kim face saving leeway to have a diplomatic meeting. At the same time the US constantly reminds them that military action is being prepared.

A:
Non-threat
****