The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.

Example Input: Context: 'I'm sorry to hear that! But can you spare 1 for me since you probably don't need all the water.' 'Sure that sounds fair. Thank you. Besides water what do you need for your trip?' 'great. Then can you give 2 food instead? We eat a lot and need more to go through the night...'
Utterance: 'Ok I understand. Since you're willing to give me 2 water I can give you 2 food. Would it be ok then if I ask for 2 firewood? The kids were talking about making s-mores'
Example Output: Yes

Example Input: Context: 'Well, there has to be an item that you need the most. If you tell me what you need the most, we can try to make a deal around it.' 'Oh I see, its going to be THAT kind of negotiation 🙂  Let's just look at it this way.. I'm with a couple other Floridians so we're not really too worried about firewood as we prefer it cooler, anyway.. and we know the lake is nearby that's stocked with trout for eating if necessary (and of course some fresh water's there, too) - so.. I can tell you that I could go totally without Firewood if I needed to.. I'd rather not, but I could.' 'Do you prefer food or water more?'
Utterance: 'Since the lake is nearby enough, I think we'd be more interested in ensuring there's enough food for my people, I think 🙂'
Example Output: Yes

Example Input: Context: 'no its not i give you i water i get 1 food and 1 firewood' 'We only have 3 of each to divide up.. so yes, you're going to have to give me one more on an item.. but in exchange I'm giving you 1 more on two different items.  I'm getting 4 items in total, you're getting 5.. - You're essentially netting 11% more 'items' than I am in this deal. ' 'thats the point as you need water so badly'
Utterance: 'Correct.. I do.. but if you're not willing to budge on this where you're still netting more overall value I understand - I'm bummed but I understand.'
Example Output:
No