In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.
--------
Question: Comment: The meaning of the slang aside, young men are virgins and women pop their "cherries" frequently with happy outcomes for all concerned. "Daddy" does not exclusively denote an actual father but more frequently alludes to an archetypical, and let's be honest here, Oedipal desire. 
In my opinion, the name has more to do with eroticism than sexual assault which is not at all "sexy". Dragging the name "Trump" into the discussion is definitely something that kills an erection--especially the female variety. Clearly, many heterosexual men have boners for Trump. Lol, what turns some men on intelligent women will never understand.

Answer: Sexual-explicit


Question: Comment: Seriously!  As a woman voter I am mostly concerned with someone's hair and whether or not they have a vagina.  I am voting for Hillary because she has a vagina and a really nice helmet of hair.

Answer: Sexual-explicit


Question: Comment: I am not assuming that she is lying or that she is telling the truth.  A photo shows a hand behind her it does not show it on her ass and it certainly doesn't show it on her bare ass... In fact it shows the opposite as the skirt would most definitely look different than it does if the back of it were being lifted AND he would have to be a freaking contortionist to touch a bare ass from that 'position' of his arm without lifting the skirt.  So I find Swifts claim of grabbing her 'bare ass' to be not only not credible but ludicrous.  And since 100% of the testimony wasn't that anyone else saw it but that Taylor Swift 'SAID' that it happened, well thats not enough evidence to do anything.  Now if she said that he grabbed her ass and not insisted that he grabbed her bare ass.. well then she has a more credible story at that point. IF that were the claim then I think she has at least a 50/50 chance of winning as it is she has 0.  Neither of these two deserve anything special.

Answer:
Sexual-explicit