In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: toxic and non-toxic. Toxicity is defiend as anything that is rude, disrespectful, or unreasonable that would make someone want to leave a converation.

Q: Comment: You raise an interesting point. It's bizarre that we preemptively attack somebody like Trump while we ignore the damage being done by globalizing demagogues like Trudeau - and, to be fair, Harper, who unlike Trudeau probably understood the damaging impacts of neoliberal economic ideology - who prioritize the interests of global capital over the interests of ordinary citizens as well as democracy itself by promoting trade deals that are only euphemistically about trade.

A: Non-toxic
****
Q: Comment: The Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) and the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission approved the deal.  The State Department was one of nine agencies comprising CFIUS, which vets potential national security impacts of transactions where a foreign government gains control of a U.S. company. The other agencies were the departments of Treasury, Defense, Justice, Commerce, Energy and Homeland Security, and two White House agencies (Office of the U.S. Trade Representative and Office of Science and Technology Policy).
Clinton herself was not involved in the State Department’s review and did not direct the department to take any position on the sale of Uranium One. As PolitiFact found, the majority of donations made to the Clinton Fdn were made before and during Clinton’s 2008 presidential run. So Trump’s claim that Hillary Clinton “gave [uranium to] Russia for a big payment” is not accurate
Quit believing crap like "Clinton Cash" and do some research yourself....

A: Non-toxic
****
Q: Comment: Trump is stupid.

A:
Toxic
****