Given a document, an entity and its sentiment towards the entity, verify if it is the correct sentiment towards the entity. Answer should be yes or no. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].
--------
Question: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Steve Bannon is Neutral . The attempts to curtail testimony to congressional investigators became clear this week when  former White House chief strategist Steve Bannon  appeared before the House Intelligence Committee and infuriated both sides of the aisle by refusing to answer questions about  his  work during the presidential transition and in the White House.
At some points during  Bannon 's six hours of closed-door testimony   his  attorney took breaks to confer via telephone with the White House counsel's office to clarify what questions could be answered and came back with the same guidance:  Bannon  could not discuss any activities related to the transition or  his  tenure in the White House.
 Bannon 's team negotiated ground rules with the White House counsel's office the week prior to his appearance before the House Intelligence Committee  according to a source familiar with the situation.
The President's personal legal team was aware of discussions between the White House counsel's office and  Bannon 's lawyer about protecting a possible privilege claim. But it wasn't their decision  according to a person familiar with the discussions. The protection of the privilege is a matter for the White House  not the President's legal team  because it relates to the office.
Before the hearing   Bannon 's lawyer informed a staff member of Rep. Devin Nunes  the California Republican who chairs the House Intelligence Committee  that  Bannon  planned to claim executive privilege on topics beyond the presidential campaign  a source said.
But that information was apparently tightly held. "It caught me personally by surprise" that  Bannon  asserted executive privilege  said Rep. Mike Conaway  the Texas Republican leading the committee's Russia investigation.
South Carolina Rep. Trey Gowdy and Florida Rep. Tom Rooney  the other two Republicans leading the Russia probe along with Conaway  also said they weren't aware of any agreement between the White House and committee staff about the scope of  Bannon 's testimony.
"They wouldn't do that because I'd ask what I think is relevant to ask  and if you've got a legal privilege you can assert it " Gowdy said  adding that  Bannon  was in a "legally indefensible position."
As it became clear on Tuesday that  Bannon  was refusing to answer questions  the committee served  him  with a subpoena to compel  him  to divulge additional information.
But the scope of what  Bannon  was claiming was privileged shocked members from both parties.
" His  version of executive privilege is it covers the transition  the time  he  was at the White House and covers time forever " Gowdy told Fox News Wednesday. "That is no one's definition of executive privilege."
Lawmakers were also offended that  Bannon  had already divulged details about some of  his  post-campaign activities in Michael Wolff's explosive book "Fire and Fury " but then refused to discuss those events with the committee.  Bannon 's attorney also informed members that he would  in fact  answer those questions when he meets with special counsel Robert Mueller's team because executive privilege doesn't apply to Mueller's investigation.
Democrats charge that  Bannon 's appearance before the House committee marks the broadest attempt so far at using privilege to shield events that occurred from the moment Trump was elected.
Republicans haven't ruled out the possibility of holding  Bannon  in contempt  but at least one GOP member -- Gowdy -- suggested it was unlikely.
House Speaker Paul Ryan downplayed the issue of whether witnesses like  Bannon  might be abusing the bounds of executive privilege.
Still   Bannon 's stonewalling sparked a sharp warning from Conaway -- the Republican leading the House Russia probe -- to White House aides who might follow the Bannon model: "We're going to insist on getting questions we need to answer our report."

Answer: yes


Question: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Bernie Sanders is Positive . Bay Area political events : Bernie Sanders , no-hate march . 
Bernie Sanders : Sen. Bernie Sanders , independent-Vt. , speaks at a California Nurses Association-sponsored rally in favor of a single-payer health care system . 
Fifteen Senate Democrats are flirting with a ... more Photo : Andrew Harrer , Bloomberg Bay Area political events : Bernie Sanders , no-hate march 1  1 Back to Gallery .

Answer: no


Question: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Stephen Paddock is Negative . Firing from the 32nd floor of a hotel near the cityâs world famous neon-lit Strip  at night  at a range of 500 yards with an arsenal of high-velocity semi-automatic weapons modified to shoot rapidly   gunman Stephen Paddock  had pulled the city into a nightmare that left him virtually unopposed for crucial minutes  with police unable to safely return fire.
 Paddock  sprayed bullets continuously on the concert crowd of 22 000 people for about 10 minutes  starting at 10:05 p.m. PT (1:05 a.m. ET on Monday)  according to Clark County Sheriff Joseph Lombardo. Police blew open Paddockâs hotel room door 75 minutes after the shooting started  finding he had killed himself.
âIt did cause some challenges logistically  being outgunned like that â said Lieutenant Reggie Rader  one of the MACTAC team members. He said officers did their best to get as quickly as possible to the hotel room from which  Paddock  was firing.
Seroka said that many hotels in Las Vegas are equipped with technology to detect projectiles like cigarette butts coming off balconies and to pinpoint the room  but said there are no balconies at the Mandalay Bay hotel where  Paddock  had set up.
Seroka  a former U.S. Air Force colonel and veteran of both Gulf Wars  lamented the length of time  Paddock  ultimately had to shoot at the crowd. âNine minutes is an eternity when you are taking fire â he said.

Answer:
yes