The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.

Input: Consider Input: Context: 'If you need water for a medical issue the of course you can have two waters.' 'You are being very kind then, im elderly so trying to make fresh water by boiling it from getting it from a river was concerning to me. How about you take all three of the food for your kiddo's' 'That sounds fair. The kids can bathe in the stream. We are good with 2 food packs.'
Utterance: 'Lol, wish i could. Then you take all 3 of the firewood, I'll take 2 of the Water and 1 of the food, sound good?'

Output: No


Input: Consider Input: Context: 'Hello! We're going camping and need some additional supplies. The primary need right now is firewood! We can spare water, but some additional food for the six kids is needed!' 'Wow. You took six kids on this trip? I would say you will definitely need food!'
Utterance: 'Yup! But we did think ahead and ordered extra rations for them. Food is second priority, so maybe we could have 2 of those? You could have all of the water rations.'

Output: Yes


Input: Consider Input: Context: 'I don't care about the firewood, but I would like food and water the most.' 'you can take water if i get all the firewood and some food' 'I'll take all the water, you can take all the firewood. What would be fair for the food?'
Utterance: 'we have to split it somehow'


Output: No