We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

Example Input: That would theoretically work except the fact that more knife murders may occur then and perhaps guns will be brought in illegally to murder people.
Example Output: Valid

Example Input: It doesnt say you have the right to shoot arms so it would be okay to ban bullets.
Example Output: Valid

Example Input: You somehow seem to think that getting rid of guns will stop people from killing each other.
Example Output:
Valid