In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: insult and non-insult. Insult is any lanugage or act that is disrespectful or scornfully abusive.

Example Input: Comment: You're stupidity seems to defy logic. You're part of the destructive left-wing. You're entire life is based on lies, normal for you. So you call others opinions a lie only because they differ from yours. Typical socialist thinking.
Example Output: Insult

Example Input: Comment: You're an ignorant asshole. He didn't choose for them to be marching down that street. 

What do girls think will happen when they go to a club with a mini-skirt on. Not get sexually assaulted. But according to you it's their fault if they do. 

You're a turd.
Example Output: Insult

Example Input: Comment: Prgressivm :  



Agreed and unfortunately Islamism is spread by the radical sect Wabbabis of Saudi Arabia in their religious schools or Madrassas throughout the Muslim world. It is also up to moderate Muslims to break this link to the Wahhabis. They don't seem to be doing a good job of this as evidenced by the visiting Imam to a mosque in Montreal who preached killing jews one by one; and apparently no Muslim in the mosque reported this incendiary speech to the authorities. Our government could best use their resources to combat Islamism (per example) rather than a mis-guided and wrong headed effort to combat Islamophobia by bill M-103. The sharia law of the Islamists provides for harsh penalties for criticism of the koran, Islam or Mohammed and it seems to me bill M-103 borrows from the ideology of the Islamists as it attempts to enshrine in Canada protection against criticism of Islam when in some instances, criticism should be made rather than covered up.
Example Output:
Non-insult