TASK DEFINITION: In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine the neutral choice based on your inference from the statement and your commonsense knowledge. The neutral choice is a sentence that neither agrees nor disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3', corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence. If sentence X agrees with sentence Y, one's correctness follows from the other one. If sentence X disagrees with sentence Y, they can not be correct at the same time.
PROBLEM: Statement: He has just rushed past me like a mad bull." Choices: 1. He stood next to me. 2. He ran by me, eager to get outside. 3. He ran by me.

SOLUTION: 2

PROBLEM: Statement: Is there something more, sir? Choices: 1. There's nothing else obviously, sir. 2. Was there anything else, sir? 3. This wasn't the first time he'd been asked that question.

SOLUTION: 3

PROBLEM: Statement: This kind of glorification might be justified if economics were actually like physics, with a clear ability to predict the behavior of our subject matter so that we could objectively decide which economists were better than others. Choices: 1. Glorification would be appropriate if possible to objectively determine which economists were better than others. 2. Everyone agrees that economics is predictable and that the merits of economists are therefore easy to judge. 3. The majority believe that it is possible to establish which economists are better.

SOLUTION:
3