instruction:
In this task, you will be presented with a context from an academic paper and a question separated with a 
. You have to answer the question based on the context.
question:
A recently published dataset called SCAN BIBREF2 (Simplified version of the CommAI Navigation tasks), tests compositional generalization in a sequence-to-sequence (seq2seq) setting by systematically holding out of the training set all inputs containing a basic primitive verb ("jump"), and testing on sequences containing that verb. 
 Question: How does the SCAN dataset evaluate compositional generalization?
answer:
it systematically holds out inputs in the training set containing basic primitive verb, "jump", and tests on sequences containing that verb.


question:
To assess the consistency of annotations and also eliminate coincidental annotations, we used agreement rates, which is calculated by dividing the number of senses under each category where the annotators annotate consistently by the total number of each kind of sense. And considering the potential impact of unbalanced distribution of senses, we also used the Kappa value. 
 Question: Which inter-annotator metric do they use?
answer:
agreement rates Kappa value


question:
The task presented here was easy and simple to analyze, however, future work may be done on natural language tasks. If these properties hold it might indicate that a new evaluation paradigm for NLP should be pushed; one that emphasizes performance on uncharacteristic (but structurally sound) inputs in addition to the data typically seen in training. 
 Question: Can the findings of this paper be generalized to a general-purpose task?
answer:

Yes