Categorize the comment on the basis of toxicity. If the comment is toxic (harmful, malicious, derogatory, threat, insult, identity attck, etc.) output Yes, otherwise output No.

[Q]: "Residents take an active role in maintaining the camps, keeping order, fixing things that get broken, watching after one another and providing a much-needed sense of community and stability in their lives."  You mean like we all do in our daily life?  The volunteering is admirable, but not an indication of the success of programs.
[A]: No


[Q]: Insulting anyone, not just women, is a Trump personality trait.  It's not a weakness for him, it's just part of who he is.  

An arrogant, loud-mouthed bully.  

The ultimate "Ugly American."
[A]: Yes


[Q]: Actually math, physics, biology, and chemistry are quite important. Politics has naught to do with it. A number of us spent many years learning how to use these tools, as well as the scientific method (a means of testing ideas and using quantifiable and repeatable observations to support or refute hypotheses) to try to better understand the world around us and the processes that drive its systems. The grossly predominant conclusion based on overwhelming peer-reviewed evidence and analyses, is that the byproducts of our (humans) wasteful overuse of fossil fuels in inefficient manners is unnaturally altering the earths atmosphere causing peturbations to climactic systems at a phenomenal rate that can't be explained by other natural phenomena. It's actually fairly simple math, physics, and chemistry when broken down into manageable chunks. I'd be happy to explain the math, chemistry, physics, and biology leading to these rational conclusions to you sometime.
[A]:
No