In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

[EX Q]: Comment: But federal government funded and controlled healthcare is currently about 67% of national healthcare, leaving private insurance at about 33%. So how will wringing "ridiculous deductibles and premiums to the for-profit insurance companies" of a small percent of national healthcare result in enough funding for Medicare-for-all. The math doesn't add up unless income and payroll taxes are increased significantly.

And remember not all private insurance is for profit, Kaiser-Permante and other private providers are non-profit.
[EX A]: Non-identity-attack

[EX Q]: Comment: He was already a registered sex offender. This just put the seal on his need to be on the registry for life.

That being said I don't agree with the sex offender registry. It's a form of double punishment for criminals who have served their time. If they can't trust them to not offend again then don't let them out at all.
[EX A]: Non-identity-attack

[EX Q]: Comment: It had to be a Muslim. How else would they know where to throw the bomb?
[EX A]:
Identity-attack