In this task, you will be presented with a context from an academic paper and a question separated with a 
. You have to answer the question based on the context.

Input: Consider Input: Figure FIGREF23 shows the proposed ontology, which, in our evaluation procedure, was populated with 3121 events entries from 51 documents. 
 Question: How is the effectiveness of this pipeline approach evaluated?

Output: proposed ontology, which, in our evaluation procedure, was populated with 3121 events entries from 51 documents.


Input: Consider Input: Using the distribution of the individual words in a category, we can compile distributions for the entire category, and therefore generate maps for these word categories.  
 Question: Do they build a model to automatically detect demographic, lingustic or psycological dimensons of people?

Output: No


Input: Consider Input: We will compare to the more recent cross-lingual language model XLM BIBREF12, as well as the state-of-the-art CoNLL 2018 shared task results with predicted tokenisation and segmentation in an updated version of the paper. In French, no extensive work has been done due to the limited availability of NER corpora. We compare our model with the strong baselines settled by BIBREF49, who trained both CRF and BiLSTM-CRF architectures on the FTB and enhanced them using heuristics and pretrained word embeddings. In the TRANSLATE-TRAIN setting, we report the best scores from previous literature along with ours. BiLSTM-max is the best model in the original XNLI paper, mBERT which has been reported in French in BIBREF52 and XLM (MLM+TLM) is the best-presented model from BIBREF50. 
 Question: What is the state of the art?


Output: POS and DP task: CONLL 2018
NER task: (no extensive work) Strong baselines CRF and BiLSTM-CRF
NLI task: mBERT or XLM (not clear from text)