In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Input: Consider Input: Comment: murphmobile: Is it ok to say f**k you in these posts?

Output: Obscene


Input: Consider Input: Comment: Maybe it is time for testing. Can't pass the "basic pet care test"? No pets. Fail the "basic pet care test" more than once and you don't even get to take the "basic child care" test. Poor unLucky the dog.

Output: Non-obscene


Input: Consider Input: Comment: Some truth to that.
There is a national newspaper in Canada that posts endless immigration articles - but only ones that fit a progressive narrative - when a migrant raped and murdered a young girl in Germany recently - a story reported in other news outlets around the world - that story wasn't posted.
They do it a lot I notice - it's only news when it fits their narrative.
So when a story breaks about some crazy driving into a crowd at OSU - I didn't check that source to find an answer to the obvious question - who? - I went to that "other" site- because I know if their is any dirt they will post it in giant red letters.
It isn't the fake news that worries me - it's not reporting real news that does.


Output: Non-obscene