In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

[EX Q]: Comment: Trid sees nothing wrong with "No Dogs or Jews", "We don't serve Muslims" and so on. He supports bigotry. And no, that is NOT a straw man, but the clear and obvious implication of your " If either the buyer or the seller does not want to enter into that contract for whatever reason then I believe they have the right to refuse." Thank you for proving that your claim to being a Christian is a complete sham.
[EX A]: Non-sexual-explicit

[EX Q]: Comment: And I can give you a whole history down through the centuries with popes, cardinals, bishops and priests who had sex with women, girls, and boys----they didn't care which. 
 

Because Pope Sixtus IV [1471-84] collected church tax on prostitutes and charged priests for keeping mistresses, it's believed that this was what increased the clerical homosexuality---not being homosexual.
[EX A]: Sexual-explicit

[EX Q]: Comment: Had the Germans believed in taking more responsibility for their own security, they probably wouldn’t have been quite so cavalier and thrown caution to the wind when they admitted 1M unvetted migrants from terror-prone countries last year.
[EX A]:
Non-sexual-explicit