TASK DEFINITION: Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
PROBLEM: He would be crazy to have it anywhere near central Eugene.    The audience would overwhelming be protesters.   The rally would end up a huge failure.  

One almost wonders if he is coming here for the very purpose of putting on a spectacle that will garner him more headlines??

Maybe he would like to have a headline saying that liberals rioted at one of his rallies?   Protesters will need to control themselves, and not let Trump supporters bait them.

SOLUTION: No

PROBLEM: You throw in the years of tax reductions for the pharmaceutical houses in Puerto Rico which are just now hatching their toxic eggs for their residents and Big Pharma's profits, as aided by the Senate and Congress of the United States, really tend to add up.

SOLUTION: Yes

PROBLEM: I do applaud the Register Guard for taking this step. Over the long haul it might lead to a more relaxed and fun forum for discussion. For a long time I called for the same policy online as in the paper itself, make people use their real names, as anonymity seemed to foster bullying. But I came to understand that wouldn't allow a city employee to call out dumb behavior by government, without their getting fired.

I do have some questions going forward, regarding just what is civil and what is not. I recognize bullying when I see it, as it strives to humiliate a fellow human. But if I call someone a nincompoop for tricking my country into a war, is that civil?  How do I criticize dangerous behavior without going too far? Maybe a little more guidance as to what is considered civil would help. While civility is essential, so is honesty and clear language. Sometimes civility is just impossible. Would Michael Moore's movie,  "Where to Invade Next", be seen as civil?
Hugh Massengill, Eugene

SOLUTION:
Yes