instruction:
In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
question:
Comment: Trump's lack of preparation, showed through loud and clear!
answer:
Agree


question:
Comment: People are getting run over due to the dismal deficit in road infracture in road improvements. Guess what? People arent going to stop driving cars. Guess what? Its cold in Canada, so people aren't going to stop driving cars. Guess what? Public transportation is for the poor and people arent going to stop driving cars. 

Improve the roads, give drivers a chance at having the right of way (ie pedestrain crossing with no turn light no cars), and spend money on roads and intersections instead of building the little empires of public transpo.
answer:
Disagree


question:
Comment: This is really hard. You bargaining with a bully that wants the right to slap on tariffs at any time which would know from experience in softwood lumber would be applied for political reasons rather than reasons of fairness. At the same time, the bully teases you with potential access to a market vital to the present configuration of our economy. It isn't about friendship or partnership - it is avowedly "me first and only me". I don't envy our negotiators and I can only say it heightens my enthusiasm for seeking greater partnership with Europe. There are so many great Americans and great American companies that I really mourn for the loss of friendship the Trump administration implicitly (in our case) represents. With the Mexicans it is explicit.
answer:

Agree