TASK DEFINITION: You are given first 5 messages from a series of message exchanges between 2 persons playing the game of Diplomacy which is an American strategic board game. You need to generate the next message. The message should be generated such that it fits the context seen so far. Avoid the text that is (i) tangent to the context, (ii) repeats the context.
PROBLEM: ['Hello, brother Turk! Whaddya say we just steamroll this board? Full juggernaut, no funny business, get your fleet out, pop mine, roll the board. I like picking an ally early on and sticking with them, and I want it to be you.', 'Hi Russia, I do think an alliance between us would be ideal.  I plan to do a fairly standard opening and we can work from there', 'What do you think? Are we good to proceed?', "Yep. I'll send Sevastopol to Rumania, you send Ankara to Constantinople, and we can juggernaut this.", "I'm not sure I'm ready to commit on the black sea yet, though. What do you say we bump there for the first year?"]

SOLUTION: I mean, I feel like it's a pretty big waste of time, because there's a huge tactical momentum advantage to getting your fleet out, but if you insist then we can bounce.

PROBLEM: ['Hallo there my dearest Tsar! Still figuring this messaging system out haha', "France, what's up my friend?  Do I have anything to worry about from my neighbors?  Would you tell me if I did?", "Of course I would, and I haven't heard anything yet. I may have heard some plan involving taking out England early? Unsure 😉", 'I suppose you really wanted to be in burgundy! What’s next? Would you like assistance?', 'Assistance would be nice, depends what form it comes in though 😄']

SOLUTION: Nicely done.  Do you plan on helping England against Germany?  If you'd like, the three of us could take down Germany together, and then you and I team up on England.  What are your thoughts on this general strategy?  If you agree, we can figure out the specific tactics as we go along.

PROBLEM: ['Greetings!\n\nI was just wondering what your aims were regarding territory in the area? May I suggest that we keep Tyr as a DMZ for the time being?', 'Hi there, Italy!  In my experience, Austria and Italy fighting anytime before 1904 or so ends one way: they are both eliminated.  So keeping a DMZ is good (ideally find a way to keep all four of TRL, ADR, TRI and VEN as a DMZ) but even better would be a joint goal we can work together on.  Typically as Austria my thoughts are to keep Russia and Turkey from allying, and pick one side against the other.  If you wanted to go after Turkey with me, that could work, but if you wanted to go after France (with either English or German help), I could go after Russia with Turkish help.  In general, I guess I’m saying I’m willing to go almost any sensible way that goes along with an alliance which I can grow to trust 🙂', "I was definitely thinking of going after France, as I find they can quickly spiral out of control if uncontested.\n\nMight be best if you go after Turkey with Russia and I'll focus my attention West", 'Awesome.  I reached out to Russia and will let you know how that turns out. You have any indications that you’ll get any help against France? It can be a slow and annoying slog if you go 1:1 against them...', 'England seems to be interested, so hopefully we can nip France in the bud ASAP']

SOLUTION:
So how did we want to move in Spring to set us both up to feel safe and not tightly entangled in each other’s business?  Any particular moves you have in mind, given what you’ve been hearing?