TASK DEFINITION: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.
PROBLEM: Comment: Stole the election huh?   More like had it handed to them by an incompetent bunch that arrogantly presumed it was theirs to keep.  For your edification, today's Democrats aren't your ( or my ) daddy's, and your trotting out the 1960's nostalgia file only underlines the point. Trump got elected in large measure because the Democrats are little better than Republicans( and worse in some aspects) when it comes to economic issues faced by your average voter. As a matter of fact, a number of well-knowns have made the case that Richard Nixon was our last truly "liberal"( you know, supporting all the good domestic stuff, Watergate excepted) president. Reviewing the record, I'd have to agree. Stick that in your partisan pipe and smoke it. 

"Trumplicans don't even support voting rights. They're un-American and fascists who love Putin."

Just substitute "communists" for "fascists" and you'd be right at home with Joe McCarthy. Your a true patriot.

SOLUTION: Non-identity-attack

PROBLEM: Comment: Oh, “BIGOTRY!”
Homosexual acts are sinful, and, according to Sacred Scripture, one of the four sins “crying to heaven for vengeance.”  A gay marriage is (un)naturally going to involve said acts.  Are you capable of comprehending this?  The baker doesn’t want to participate in a wedding that promotes this sin.  Now, a bigot is “a person who is obstinately or intolerantly devoted to his or her own opinions and prejudices; [you certainly fit that description to a tee] especially :one who regards or treats the members of a group (such as a racial or ethnic group) with hatred and intolerance.”
The question boils down to obstinacy and intolerance.  Well, when bases his opinion or belief of something as crystal clear as”homosexual behavior is sinful”, is it obstinacy or principled dissent?  And why do you think we should be tolerant of sin?  That certainly isn’t Christ-like, being as that Christ admonished everyone to “sin no more.”  You are the obstinate bigot here, clearly.

SOLUTION: Identity-attack

PROBLEM: Comment: Quote: "Michelle Obama is taking some heat for recent remarks she made on gender, but I'm struggling to muster outrage given the sheer incoherence of what she actually said."

True, I've rarely found what Michelle says coherent, but I suspect that what she's saying is primarily directed at black communities. She could have gone much further and bluntly stated that blacks coddle far too much the criminality and paternal irresponsibility in black males. (I won't call them men.) That's glaringly obvious and different from mostly white schools where ordinary boyishness is attacked as "toxic masculinity."

SOLUTION:
Identity-attack