Given a document, an entity and its sentiment towards the entity, verify if it is the correct sentiment towards the entity. Answer should be yes or no. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

Q: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Jeremy Corbyn is Neutral . Jeremy Corbyn to declare in speech "Labour is ready" for government.
LONDON â  Jeremy Corbyn  will tell activists Labour "is ready for government" and that it is a "government in waiting" in his speech to close the party's conference on Wednesday.
Following rifts in the cabinet over how to deal with Brexit becoming public in recent weeks   Corbyn  will say: "The Tories are more interested in posturing for personal advantage than in getting the best deal for Britain. Never has the national interest been so ill-served on such a vital issue. If there were no other reason for the Tories to go  their self-interested Brexit bungling would be reason enough.
 Corbyn  will challenge the Conservative government to "pull yourself together" after Theresa May's Florence speech failed to break the stalemate in Brexit negotiations  with European Council president Donald Tusk saying on Tuesday that there has not been "sufficient progress" to allow talks to advance.
In his keynote speech   Corbyn  will say: "Yes  we didnât do quite well enough and we remain in opposition for now. But we have become a government-in-waiting.
 Corbyn  will say: "The disregard for rampant inequality  the hollowing out of our public services  the disdain for the powerless and the poor have made our society more brutal and less caring.
A Labour source said on Tuesday that  Corbyn  will also use his conference speech to announce details of a number of new policies.

A: yes
****
Q: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Elaine Luria is Negative . The reason I raise this now is because weâve got a candidate seeking the Democratic nomination (and just named to the DCCCâs âRed-to-Blueâ list) in VA-02  Elaine Luria  who voted for Republican Scott Taylor both in the 2016 GOP primary AND in the 2016 general election against the Democratic nominee in VA-02. According to Patrick Wilsonâs report in the RTD (bolding added by me for emphasis):
â Elaine  doesnât make decisions just based on political party â  her  campaign manager said by email. âFaced with the options on the ballot   she  took a chance on fellow veteran Scott Taylor who promised to bring change and be something different  but he broke those promises.â
âLike many Democrats in our district   Elaine  voted against Randy Forbes in that primary because he had shown during his legislative career to be an extreme voice in Congress  particularly when it came to womenâs reproductive freedom  LGBT equality  and preventing gun violence â Luria campaign manager Kathryn Sorenson said by email.
âNow  after seeing the way that Scott Taylor has acted in Washington and the votes he has taken to create chaos in our health care system   Elaine  has decided to run against him.â
Back in January  I had actually asked  Luria  about  her  vote in the GOP primary  and  she  responded: âThat year  there was no Democratic primary for Congress and I wanted to have my voice heard on who was on the ballot.â I responded to  her  that âI would have voted for Mickey Mouse or something in that one.â I havenât heard a word from  her  since. LOL
At this point  I havenât chosen a candidate in VA-02  but itâs been between  Luria  and Karen Mallard  the only two serious contenders for the Democratic nomination  as far as Iâm concerned. But Iâve got to say  the news about  Luria  voting for Taylor really bugs me  for at least three reasons.
First off  I think that Taylor is going to have a field day with this. Already  Taylorâs spokesperson is responding gleefully to the RTD  âScott Taylor is the same guy he was in 2016 and has done everything he said he would on the campaign. The only reason  Luria  is running is because she was promised money by Nancy Pelosi to be another rubber stamp in D.C. The people of the 2nd district will see right through it.â Expect to hear a LOT of that type of language in coming months  and certainly if  Elaine Luria  becomes the Democratic nominee in VA-02. So yeah  I truly do not see how this will help  Luria  win the general election. To the contrary  I think it will hurt  her  that  she  voted not once but twice for the same guy  she  voted for less than two years ago.
So thatâs my âJim Webb testâ for Democratic candidates who used to vote Republican: can you explain  articulately and convincingly  why you used to vote Republican (or even serve in a Republican administration) but are now a Democrat? Regarding  Elaine Luria    she  very well might have such a case to make  but so far I havenât heard it. To the contrary  Iâve mostly heard about how  she  doesnât vote based on party (whatever that means  given the stark differences between Democrats and the Party of Sarah Palin  Ken Cuccinelli  Corey Stewart  E.W. Jackson  Donald Trump  etc.  etc.)  how  Taylor  supposedly wasnât what  she  expected  him  to be  etc.
On that latter point  my friend Josh Stanfield of Activate Virginia posted on  his  groupâs Facebook page this morning something that rings true to me: â Scott Taylor  was a member of the House of Delegates and had a partisan voting record in that body. When  he  ran for Congress in 2016  anyone interested in  his  politics or voting behavior wouldâve been just a few clicks away from discovering  his  opposition to pretty much every Democratic priority.â

A: no
****
Q: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Kassandra Lawrence is Positive . Kassandra Lawrence  was desperate.
 Lawrence  couldnât afford the cost of a private attorney upfront. So  in an effort to find an alternative  she did an online search for âpregnancy discriminationâ and âIvanka Trumpâ â the only high-profile person she knew who was talking about family-leave issues. The search led her to a story that mentioned the NWLC.
âI just knew that what happened to me wasnât right and shouldnât happen to anyone else â  Lawrence  said. âIt certainly didnât seem right that you need to be rich  or somehow have a lot of extra money for a lawyer to even get to court.â
The problems had started when  Lawrence  delivered  her  second child.  She  had been working for the Stafford County  Va.  sheriffâs office for eight years when  she  became pregnant again. The pregnancy went smoothly  but the delivery did not.  Lawrence  lost a lot of blood during a complicated Caesarean section.
In the middle of  her  recovery  the sheriffâs department told  Lawrence   she  needed to report to work on a specific date or reapply for a job  according to  her  lawsuit.  She  had 12 weeksâ leave  no more  under the Family and Medical Leave Act  and  she  had already taken âtoo muchâ time off. All of it was essentially regarded as optional by a department official who said âwomen chose to have children â the lawsuit says.  She  should have planned things in a way that wasnât so disruptive.
 Lawrence  needed  her  job  and  she  liked it.  She  still does. So  she  went back to work in pain and with scar tissue wrapped around some of  her  organs.  Lawrence  put off surgery to remove it because  she  knew how it would be received at work.
When  she  took time off for carpel tunnel surgery on  her  weapon hand â necessary to do  her  job â department officials accused  her  of medical malingering   she  said  using leave time to be with  her  kids.
Thatâs when  she  saw it: a memo from the sheriff asking employees to donate leave time to a colleague undergoing cancer treatment. The sheriff asserted that  while the man had exhausted his 12 weeks of leave  he deserved the departmentâs help   Lawrence  said.
âI had already  at this point  had a lot of strange conversations  had a lot of things said to  me  about women being such an unfair burden on the department â  Lawrence  said. âFirst  you question yourself. You do. Then  like most people who need their jobs  you [get] angry. You get scared. But that memo  I just couldnât believe that theyâd put this attitude in a memo  clear as day.â

A:
yes
****