The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.

Context: 'You have been most thoughtful during this negotiation I just want to say thank you for being so helpful.🙂' 'absolutly! You as well. So just to confirm. Me 2 food 1 water, 1 firewood. You, 1 food, 2 water, and 2 firewood? Sound good?' 'That looks like the correct arrangement, and again thank you and I wish you the best on your camping trip '
Utterance: 'sounds good! Looking forward to camping! maybe we'll run into each other on the trail! ;)'
No

Context: 'I am good as well. That is good to hear that you like to have bigger fires as we do not care much for that. We would much rather have some extra water.' 'Water is a little important to us too though , if possible maybe we can split that or maybe we can get some more food in replacement.' 'That may be possible.... 🙂 What did you have in mind for the food replacement? '
Utterance: 'You can have all the water if we can have all the food?'
No

Context: 'Sounds good.  I suggest you make a fire and relax. ' 'Just need a little more wood.  Then it will be great to cook my dinner on.' 'I got some spare wood. I’m a little short on food though. I didn’t pack enough. '
Utterance: 'Great, we can split the food, how are you on water?'

No