Given a passage with a context and an answer, construct a question on the basis of the information present in the passage. Construct the question in such a way that (i) it is unambiguous, (ii) it is answerable from the passage, (iii) its answer is unique (iv) it answer uses text phrases from the passage. Avoid creating questions that (i) can't be answered correctly without actually understanding the passage and (ii) uses the same words or phrases given in the passage.

[Q]: Context: To assess, in a retrospective cohort, urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UT-UC) in patients with various stages of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and their clinicopathological features, as patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) have a higher incidence of UT-UC, but the relationship between early stages of CKD and characteristics of UT-UC are less well known.', 'The study included 267 patients with pathologically confirmed UT-UC from January 1994 to December 2006; all had a physical examination (blood pressure), and measurements of laboratory data (serum creatinine, serum haemoglobin) and pathological data. The glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was calculated using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease equation. Patients were divided into three groups by individual GFR (mL/min), i.e. >60 (no/mild CKD), 30-60 (CKD stage 3) and <30 (CKD stage 4/5).', 'The CKD stages included 81 (30.3%) patients with none/mild CKD, 121 (45.3%) with CKD stage 3 and 65 (24.3%) with CKD stage 4/5. There was a significant and parallel increase in the frequency of UT-UC as CKD severity increased from none/mild CKD to stage 3 (11% vs 55%), and from CKD stage 3 to 4/5 (55% vs 71%; P < 0.05). Pathologically, the frequency of high-grade and high T stage UT-UC in patients with CKD stage 3 (90% and 35%, respectively) and CKD stage 4/5 (91% and 29%, respectively) were significantly greater than in the group with none/mild CKD (P < 0.001). Advanced age and more distant metastasis were independent risk factors for patient survival.
Answer: The aggressiveness of UT-UC increased with the severity of CKD, and this might have important clinical consequences.
[A]: Does the aggressiveness of urinary tract urothelial carcinoma increase with the severity of chronic kidney disease?


[Q]: Context: Hepatic resection is well established as a potentially curative treatment for hepatic colorectal cancer metastases. However, only a small proportion of patients with liver metastases are suitable for resection because they either have extrahepatic disease, or the extent and/or the distribution of their hepatic disease would make excision impossible. We have previously described the use of cryotherapy for inadequate resection margins and lesions in the remaining lobe of the liver. Combining such cryodestructive techniques with resection offers the possibility of increasing the proportion of patients to whom potentially curative treatment can be offered. The aim of this study was to compare survival in patients treated with resection and cryotherapy against those of patients treated with resection alone. Potential prognostic variables were also examined.', 'Patients undergoing a hepatic resection with or without cryotherapy at our unit between April 1990 and July 1997 were identified from our database and their notes reviewed. Survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the Log rank test.', 'One hundred and seven patients were treated in total: 32 underwent resection alone, and 75 underwent resection combined with cryotherapy. There was no significant difference between the survival of patients treated with resection alone and those treated with resection and cryotherapy.
Answer: Edge and contralobe cryotherapy can be combined with hepatic resection to allow a greater proportion of patients with hepatic colorectal metastases to be offered treatment, and results in similar survival figures comparable to hepatic resection for at least 3 years.
[A]: Does resection with cryotherapy of colorectal hepatic metastases have the same survival as hepatic resection alone?


[Q]: Context: High anxiety has been reported in patients with drug hypersensitivity reaction (DHR); however, its relationship with the test results was not studied previously.', 'We aimed to investigate the association of patient anxiety with the results of drug tests together with the other contributing factors.', 'Sixty-seven patients were included in the study between November 2012 and April 2013, in whom drug tests were performed after clinical evaluation and application of the Penn State Worry Questionnaire (PSWQ).', 'The mean ± standard deviation (SD) age was 43.5 ± 12.9 years, and 73.1% of the patients were females. The patient group had significantly higher mean ± SD PSWQ score than 35 control subjects without histories of DHRs and major psychiatric disorders (47.95 ± 14.64 versus 40.22 ± 11.86, p = 0.008). However, the mean ± SD. PSWQ score of the patients with positive drug test results was not significantly different from the patients with negative drug test results (46.06 ± 13.41 versus 50.47 ± 18.02, p = 0.32). Panic attack symptoms were more common in the reactions with positive test results than in the reactions with negative test results (74.0% versus 48.9%, p = 0.01). However, presence of panic attack symptoms [odds ratio (OR): 1.25, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.44-3.54; p = 0.67] was not found independently associated with positive test results in the multiple logistic regression model.
Answer: Patients with DHR have high levels of anxiety; however, this is not related to the results of drug tests. Because panic reaction symptoms may accompany the objective symptoms of DHR, a complete clinical work-up is required before deciding whether the reaction is related to panic or a "true DHR."
[A]:
Does evaluation of anxiety levels and factors associated with positive test result in patients with drug hypersensitivity?