We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Example Input: Do you think that the judicial system is so weak in its nature that all it takes is for DNA evidence to convict someone?
Example Output: Valid

Example Input: In the US at least, we have the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness as long as it doesn't infringe upon the rights of others.
Example Output: Valid

Example Input: Whether a criminal gets one appeal or two hundred appeals has little to do with guilt or innocence.
Example Output:
Valid