In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.

Q: Comment: Lesley Bikos' contention that police forces are inherently toxic is so silly and immature it is a wonder why the Globe even provided her a forum. 

Really, Globe. Why DID you run this ridiculous nonsense?

A: Disagree
****
Q: Comment: Bravo Charles!  This is the single most cogent piece I've seen written on the entire budget debacle.  Well done.

One Walker statement that especially resonated with me: "So it's about worrying about the future of Alaska, not the future of the political seats that we're in."  We have legislator politicians camped out in their seats for decades, enjoying and misusing their political power.  Walker may indeed get bounced in a couple years.  A whole bunch of other politicians should be fired as well, including mine.

A: Agree
****
Q: Comment: The lugenpresse would have us believe it is Trump who is adversarial with the lying officials.  

But in fact these officials have made unsupported accusations, delayed meeting with Congress and then showed up unprepared to give answers, changed meeting dates with the President-Elected and blamed him, and leaked secrets to media even before they were provided to him.  All this in the context of fallaciously questioning the merits of his election victory.

Many heads should roll come Jan 21.

A:
Disagree
****