In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: insult and non-insult. Insult is any lanugage or act that is disrespectful or scornfully abusive.

[EX Q]: Comment: Ah.....so now someone is automatically a jerk if they don't stand for the anthem.
I suppose I am also a jerk since I don't get the warm fuzzies from daily recitation of the Pledge of Allegiance.
[EX A]: Insult

[EX Q]: Comment: Why don't you just convict him before a trial happens whatever happen to innocent until PROVEN guilty as far as I'm concerned your a dumbass.
[EX A]: Insult

[EX Q]: Comment: The core is summed up near the end, where she writes she wants to bring Justin Trudeau's quota system, for insisting on plentiful women Cabinet Ministers, into science:

"We led by example with the first ever gender-balanced Cabinet (and with) the first feminist international-assistance policy [which sees the VAST majority of Canada's foreign aid aimed at women and girls!!!]. Science would benefit from adopting a similar approach..."

Hello?

Does the writer think Canadians are blind, lacking in memory?

Look, when Justin Trudeau came to his senses months later, he TERMINATED women cabinet ministers from their posts for lackluster performances and REPLACED them. VERY EMBARRASSING and VERY MALADAPTIVE MESSAGE for gender relations in Canada. 

And the writer wants to bring THAT MESS to universities? With SEXIST grant funding akin to Liberal foreign aid ?

I thought Trudeau's team was all about "evidence based" government. Hello? We have seen the evidence. Quotas are sexist and awful.
[EX A]:
Insult