In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine the neutral choice based on your inference from the statement and your commonsense knowledge. The neutral choice is a sentence that neither agrees nor disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3', corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence. If sentence X agrees with sentence Y, one's correctness follows from the other one. If sentence X disagrees with sentence Y, they can not be correct at the same time.

[EX Q]: Statement: We asked officials of the various organizations highlighted in the case illustrations and throughout the report to verify the accuracy of the information presented on their activities and incorporated their comments as appropriate. Choices: 1. The case illustrations highlighted a number of organizations. 2. We didn't ask any of the officials from the organizations highlighted in the case illustrations to verify the accuracy of the information presented. 3. The responses of the officials of the organizations revealed a startling number of discrepancies.
[EX A]: 3

[EX Q]: Statement: A regulator might well be required to administer any price caps, incremental-cost floors, or other restrictions. Choices: 1. A regulator must administer various tasks, despite most seeing them as useless. 2. A regulator does nothing of note. 3. A regulator must administer various tasks.
[EX A]: 1

[EX Q]: Statement: According to the Coast Guard, the program achieved its results by giving field commanders greater authority and by investing in activities and processes that went most directly to the goal of reducing risks on the water. Choices: 1. The program failed completely after seven months, didn't it? 2. Reducing risks on the water is a very important goal. 3. Commanders were partially responsible for the program's success.
[EX A]:
2