In this task, you will be shown a sentence, and you should determine whether it is overruling or non-overruling. In law, an overruling sentence is a statement that nullifies a previous case decision as a precedent by a constitutionally valid statute or a decision by the same or higher ranking court which establishes a different rule on the point of law involved. Classify your answers into overruling or non-overruling

[EX Q]: accordingly, we similarly disapprove the decisions in vanderbilt inn on the gulf v. pfenninger, __ so.2d __, 2002 wl 459252 (fla. 2d dca february 8, 2002), bomemann v. ure, 778 so.2d 1077 (fla. 4th dca 2001), and silva v. lazar, 766 so.2d 341 (fla. 4th dca 2000), to the extent that they adopt the erroneous due diligence principle of tejada which is disapproved here.
[EX A]: overruling

[EX Q]: schambach v. afford-a-pool & spa, 7th dist. no. 08 be 15, 2009-ohio-6809,  8, quoting juhasz v. costanzo, 144 ohio app.3d 756, 762, 761 n.e.2d 679 (7th dist.2001).
[EX A]: non-overruling

[EX Q]: to the extent that the ica's opinion in state v. won , 134 hawai'i 59, 74, 332 p.3d 661, 676 (app. 2014), vacated on other grounds , 137 hawai'i 330, 372 p.3d 1065 (2015), ruled that severino denied an arrestee of a criminal offense the statutory right to access counsel under hrs  803-9, it is overruled.
[EX A]:
overruling