Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.

Input: Consider Input: You forgot desa jacobsen

Output: No


Input: Consider Input: I've just been made aware that the suspects, caught with a vehicle full of $3200 (per owner) worth of goods stolen in a local break-in, just got off with just about no penalties at all. This is part of a family with multiple convictions over the generations. However, the impounded vehicle (with the stolen goods inside) was released from impound to someone using a false address. The owner will never see his stuff again. The break-in artists are free to steal again. Now we neighbors are concerned that the brave person who followed and reported these professional thieves will be subject to retaliation. This is just a microcosm of the Mat-Su and Alaska justice system...mirrors the murder situation in this article. The reasons for not fully prosecuting miscreants is: Lenient ("too compassionate") District Attorneys; easy judges; and, the kicker: not enough room in our prisons. Violent offenders like Mr. Almeda are barely punished, allowing them to seduce and kill vulnerable young women.

Output: Yes


Input: Consider Input: Bernie won't be leading in the polls once the public learns of his past positions. Here are a few questions for Bernie:

Are you still in favor of abolishing the military budget?

Are you still in favor “solidarity” with the revolutionary regimes in Iran, Nicaragua, and Cuba?

Do you still advocate public toddler nudity and genital touching as cures for porn?

Do you still believe that breast cancer and cervical cancer are due to orgasm deficiency and capitalist conformity?


Output: Yes