Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.

Example Input: The usual feed for the Green Sheep.
Example Output: No

Example Input: Unitarians are a fabulous lot, but why are they and the like minded churches so small? Even here in far-left Portland. And I'm voting for Bernie, just so you know. But as someone friendly to liberal religion I can say this, everyone bashing Jules or Imago on here is basically sounding like a single issue voter, and scarily given to group think. What if some people do think marriage is between a man and a woman? Big deal. You don't have to go to their church. (Interestingly, gays didn't seem too concerned about not being able to marry until fairly recently, but that's not my point) But to compare the fight for gay marriage to King's fight for racial justice is ludicrous. No one is better off, in any significant way, because the state of Oregon has approved their union. Blacks on the other hand, are vastly better off after the civil rights movement.
By the way, no one is accusing the church or Jules of being anti-minority.
Example Output: Yes

Example Input: The moral compass,follow it! And look not only your children in the eye but the mirror and be able to say without reservation you tried to do the right thing to prevent evil. For me not always the easy thing to do but to not try especially not vote or engage the evil is a place I never want to be.
The past generations especially the one recent one called the"greatest" paid too high of price for evil to be given ever a chance to win!
Example Output:
No