We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Sent1: I also don't think someone has been put to death for a third degree murder.
 Sent2: If I ever "murder" someone without cause, I would deserve to die.
Not similar

Sent1: With trials and appeals, one execution can end up costing more than a life sentence by the time the execution is actually carried out.
 Sent2: Life imprisonment without parole is more effective than execution, and it is cheaper.
Not similar

Sent1: The argument for the death penalty as a deterrent has been proved wrong by the implementation of it through history.
 Sent2: Your description, that the death penalty is a deterrent, is incorrect.

Similar