In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

Q: Sentence: Carol believed that Rebecca suspected that she had stolen the watch.
 Reason: The 'she' refers to carol because Because rebecca wouldn't suspect herself in a crime, she would know. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

A: Correct
****
Q: Sentence: I couldn't put the pot on the shelf because it was too tall.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the pot because it is a good sized pot and I like the color of the pot. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

A: Wrong
****
Q: Sentence: The actress used to be named Terpsichore, but she changed it to Tina a  few years ago, because she figured it was too hard to pronounce.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to terpsichore because Terpsichore was too hard to pronounce. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

A:
Correct
****