In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.
--------
Question: Comment: Useless sanction. China will support them behind the scene.

Answer: Non-obscene


Question: Comment: Why would anyone "look into" something so ignorant, and easily proven wrong?

Answer: Non-obscene


Question: Comment: Without minimizing Ratzinger's responsibility in the Maciel case, do you think it is fair to say that the ultimate responsibility was John Paul's?  John Paul's defense of Maciel ("an efficacious guide to youth"!!) represented either a callous indifference to Maciel's crimes or a willful ignorance about them. John Paul's malfeasance in this case in particular, and with regard to clergy sex abuse n general, should have precluded, or at least delayed, his canonization.

Answer:
Non-obscene