We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

[Q]: Sent1: I also don't think someone has been put to death for a third degree murder.
 Sent2: If I ever "murder" someone without cause, I would deserve to die.
[A]: Not similar


[Q]: Sent1: I think only certain people deserve to have the death penalty.
 Sent2: So I think it is better to imprison those who deserve death for life, rather than even once as a people murder the wrong person.
[A]: Not similar


[Q]: Sent1: In the case of premeditated murder, the death penalty makes even less sense as a deterent.
 Sent2: Death penalty is then in this case a lawful murder.
[A]:
Not similar