TASK DEFINITION: Given a document, an entity and its sentiment towards the entity, verify if it is the correct sentiment towards the entity. Answer should be yes or no. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].
PROBLEM: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Reza Pahlavi is Negative . Reza Pahlavi  concentrates intently on the little cellphone in  his  hand  scrolling through clips of chanting Iranians and explaining why the protests unsettling  his  homeland are different this time. Even as the latest reports suggest the unrest may be ebbing  the scion of Persia's 2 500-year-old monarchy believes Iran's people are writing a new future for themselves  and perhaps for their exiled son.
More than want   he  believes they may succeed.
Iranian officials say they've arrested some 3 700 people since Dec. 28. Some protesters have called for the government's overthrow  and videos show some vocal support for Pahlavi  who left Iran at 17 for military flight school in the United States just before  his cancer-stricken father Mohammad Reza Pahlavi  abandoned the throne for exile. Revolution meant neither  Pahlavi  ever returned.
 Pahlavi  is staying abreast of developments in Iran through what  his  aides describe as a vast network of contacts  inside and outside of the government   he  has maintained for decades. An equally important source: normal Iranians reaching out to  him  directly via social media.
But  Pahlavi  may not be the credible voice for change in a country that  he  hasn't seen in 38 years. Iranian officials accuse  him  of exploiting the instability to advance  his  personal aspirations for power in a part of the world replete with cautionary tales about long-estranged exiles believing they know what's best for their homelands. And Pahlavi's father was hardly a paragon of democracy  ruling lavishly and repressively  and benefiting from a CIA-supported 1953 coup of Iran's prime minster.
While many of the young faces in today's crowds of protesters couldn't conceivably have been born when the last shah still ruled   Pahlavi  believes the support  he  is seeing in text messages and Telegram files is genuine.
"It is not a matter of coincidence or  if you will  nostalgia " said  Pahlavi   57  insisting that a young  scrutinizing Iranian generation is expressing "rapport" with  his  message of inclusion  and rejecting the Islamic Republic's "brainwashing" and exclusion.
 He  outlined a vision of how to achieve democratic change: Intensifying "the struggle" until Iran's government implodes; initiating a transition process; holding popular elections for a constitutional assembly; enshrining secularism and democracy; free and fair voting for a first parliament and government.
But these are broad ideas that would each entail incredibly difficult processes. For example   Pahlavi  said that whatever form Iran's future government takes  it should offer amnesty to military and paramilitary forces such as those in the Revolutionary Guard Corps so they abandon the camp of Khamenei and other hardliners. Such a promise wouldn't resolve their massive stakes in Iran's economy  a source of significant popular disgruntlement.
And what of  Pahlavi 's path in this new Iran? Does it end with him sitting upon the Peacock Throne? Or does he aspire for something akin to the "Baba" role played by Mohammed Zahir Shah  Afghanistan's deposed king who returned after the fall of the Taliban as a symbolic but powerless figure of national unity?
"I don't know  to be honest with you. I know what I need to do now "  Pahlavi  answered. "I've never been preoccupied with my personal role or destiny " he said  describing fair elections in Iran as his "only mission in life " replacing the current votes for presidents and parliamentarians among pre-approved candidates.
"Of course  I stand ready to serve my country  " Pahlavi  said  noncommittally. "I have no idea in what capacity it may or may not be. I may end up just being a regular citizen living the rest of my days  or I may be called upon to play a bigger role."

SOLUTION: no

PROBLEM: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity George W Bush is Positive . After his reelection in 2004 , Bush sought major changes to Social Security , arguing a partial privatization plan could insure its solvency . 
The legacy of George W. Bush remains , much like his 2000 election , a subject of profound controversy , and any truly objective evaluation will likely be years in the future . 
The election of 2000 and the Supreme Court case of Bush v. Gore remain two of the most controversial political developments in the last half-century . 
Some thought that President Bush should begin his term by trying to find common ground and avoid controversy to take some of the edge off the nation 's polarized politics coming out of the 2000 election . 
Instead , as one of his first actions , President Bush issued an executive order creating the Office of Faith-Based and Community Initiatives , which further alienated some who thought government money should not go to organizations affiliated with churches . 
The Bush presidency transformed American politics , its economy , and its place in the world , but not in ways that could have been predicted when the governor of Texas declared his candidacy for America 's highest office . 
Within nine months of taking office , President Bush was afforded the chance to unite the nation after the terrorist attacks of September 11 , 2001 . 
By most accounts , Bush did a masterful job of speaking for and to the American people . 
As President , Bush became a lightning rod for controversy . 
Following an authorization from Congress to eliminate those who perpetrated the attacks of 911 , Bush ordered an invasion of Afghanistan . 
Those early successes , however , turned into the longest war in American history , and the President never was able to achieve the greatest symbolic goal of the effort , the killing or capturing of the mastermind of the attacks , Osama bin Laden ; U.S. special forces achieved that goal in 2011 under Bush 's successor , President Barack Obama . 
Following the 911 attacks , President Bush also presided over a restructuring of the American national security apparatus and the passage of the Patriot Act , which gave the government vast new powers in the effort to combat future acts of terror . 
Both efforts , especially the Patriot Act , sparked strong divisions within the American people throughout the Bush presidency . 
In 2002 and into 2003 , Bush used the fear of further terrorist attacks to argue for a preemptive war on Saddam Hussein 's Iraq under the rationale that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction . 
The last few months of the Bush presidency were marked by a major crash of the stock market , a controversial bail out of financial institutions and car companies , and a recession that would wipe out millions of jobs and impact the U.S. economy for many years . 
President Bush 's place in U.S. history will be debated and reconsidered for many years to come . 
On the domestic front , the Bush presidency scored early successes in gaining passage of large tax reductions and a major reform of the American educational system with the No Child Left Behind Act .

SOLUTION: yes

PROBLEM: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Terry McAuliffe is Neutral . Recently   Virginia Governor Terry McAuliffe  has been making some news when it comes to climate change.
When climate-science denier Donald Trump declared his intention to withdraw the U.S. from the Paris Climate Accord   Gov. McAuliffe  stepped up to declare that Virginia would act to address climate change at the state level.
Following an executive order earlier this year to examine what it would take for Virginia to join the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI)  the report came back with a path to join RGGI via Executive action  which  Governor McAuliffe  has initiated.
 McAuliffeâs  actions  like those noted above  merit praise for moving the ball forward in Virginia in the facing of mounting climate risks on the one hand and  on the other hand  improving clean-energy and energy efficiency economics.
Of course  a healthy relationship is also an honest one  and an honest  clear-eyed assessment of Terry McAuliffeâs climate change record is  unfortunately  far from rosy.
For many  however  disappointment with Terry McAuliffe began soon after his election  with fossil fuel interests dominating the funding of his inauguration events. For many climate-aware constituents  the door(s) seemed to be closing â and the years that followed seemed to bear out those concerns.
Simply put  Terry McAuliffe has not been a fierce clean energy warrior â let alone a climate champion  as this disturbingly fawning article incorrectly claims â through most of the past four years.
As McAuliffe finishes his term as governor and potentially considers a run for president in 2020  it appears that heâs striving in his last âsemesterâ to boost his final grade when it comes to environmental issues. While much of that striving is rhetorical flourishes  moving Virginia into RGGI is substantial. (Of course  if this can be done so easily by a Governor via administrative fiat  the question is why didnât he do this years earlier?) Also  McAuliffe merits credit for his Executive Order that led to determining how he (Virginiaâs Governor) could take the Commonwealth into the RGGI without legislative action. With RGGI in mind  one can certainly see  Terry  having boosted  his  final environmental grade â perhaps even as high as a solid C.
Meanwhile  many political observers believe that Terry McAuliffe is taking steps for a run at the Democratic Party nomination for President in 2020. To get there will almost certainly require a strong climate and clean energy track record. Unfortunately for McAuliffe  a solid C (or worse) wonât do the trick.
And that matters for Terry McAuliffe beyond the Virginia governorâs mansion. Simply put  fossil fools fund and power GOP science deniers â not potential 2020 Democratic Party presidential nominees. For Terry McAuliffe  doing the right thing on the pipelines also happens to be the right thing for him politically. The question is  will McAuliffe change course at the last minute â or will he stubbornly stick to the wrong position heâs held all along?

SOLUTION:
no