In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Example Input: Comment: Victimitis,
  The point is, all humans are liars, and they lie most when lying suits their interests. That's why, in all instances, regardless of gender, we must regard the claims of an individual as suspect, when those claims serve their interests and/or objectives such as custody of children etc.
Example Output: Non-obscene

Example Input: Comment: The question I have for BLM is: why aren't you hijacking and staging a sit-in at Toronto's Caribbean Festival Parade in August to highlight your message and agenda? It would seem like you would have a far more receptive and understanding audience there.
But no. BLM is blatantly using Pride because it is a bigger, broader, more popular and better-attended event. BLM absolutely does not care at all about the gay community; if so, they would be highlighting the homophobia and anti-gay violence in Caribbean and African counties, where gays have absolutely no rights at all.
The police absolutely must be allowed to march in next year's Pride parade. And BLM, by having violated the rules on parade participation on Sunday, must be banned.
Example Output: Non-obscene

Example Input: Comment: Can we get real?  A hand on the thigh is not groping.  People lay hands on others all the time.  It's generally accepted, so long as they don't the privates.  And with what would this guy be charged?  An unprovable claim, at best.  So does this girl's mom expect the guy to have a record and have to register as a sex offender?  Charge him with smarminess, at best.
Example Output:
Non-obscene