In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Input: Consider Input: Comment: And I can give you a whole history down through the centuries with popes, cardinals, bishops and priests who had sex with women, girls, and boys----they didn't care which. 
 

Because Pope Sixtus IV [1471-84] collected church tax on prostitutes and charged priests for keeping mistresses, it's believed that this was what increased the clerical homosexuality---not being homosexual.

Output: Sexual-explicit


Input: Consider Input: Comment: A Trump/Bannon boot-licking sycophant, Tancredo wears the cap of his wannabe president. Following Breitbart and Fox Nausea, he thinks he has it in the bag, “People know who I am,” Tancredo said. “I have great name recognition.” So does Trump, a certified moron. The mentally challenged never learn.

Output: Non-sexual-explicit


Input: Consider Input: Comment: Unless it is shown that LGBTQRSVP people are a distinctly different species of human then I do not understand the reason abnormal sex is celebrated and promoted to such a massive degree. Did we ever hold up people who had sex with their pets as being a class of humans who should have parades celebrating it, flags and posters plastered all over celebrating it, taxpayer money promoting it? WTF is going on here... its sex, nothing else... LGBTQRSVP people are not unique other than having abnormal sex. Its nuts.


Output: Sexual-explicit