In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.

Ex Input:
Comment: I am one who disagrees with you.  

Those in society who derive greater financial benefit from it, owe it a greater percentage of their income.

In fact, I would go further, and stratify incomes into the tens of millions (56% on those over $500k, 66% over $5M, 76% over $15M, 86% over $30M - feel free to choose your own numbers here...).  This is not a new idea - top tax brackets in the US in 1945 were 94% over $200k.  

As well, in the booming 50's top tax rates were 91% (in the USA).

Ex Output:
Disagree


Ex Input:
Comment: I wouldn't count on Murkowski holding office much longer if her disloyalty continues.  This is still a red state---and a state who supported Trump.  If she wants to run as a democrat or independent , that's fine.  But stabbing her fellow republicans in the back isn't going to be tolerated . All of Alaska is going to pay a price for her disloyalty .

Ex Output:
Disagree


Ex Input:
Comment: I suggest you say that to the media also, he answered her question, she kept pushing, I would of just walked also.  At least he answers questions unlike the full of bull PM.

Ex Output:

Disagree