In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence can be inferred from the statement. Incorrect choices change the meaning in important ways or have details that are not mentioned in the statement. Indicate your answer as 1,2, or 3 corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.

[EX Q]: Statement: Next, pass under a series of soaring gopurams, where you can witness religion as a full-time daily occupation. Choices:  1. Religious observance has become even more popular in recent years. 2. Most people here don't take their faith very seriously. 3. Religion is a pervasive and omnipresent occupation.
[EX A]: 3

[EX Q]: Statement: He has two law partners, Lori Mannicci and Linda Gardner. Choices:  1. He has known these partners for almost a decade. 2. he has no way of getting into contact with any members in law. 3. He has partners in law.
[EX A]: 3

[EX Q]: Statement: The award says a lot about the legal profession, that it places such a high honor on pro bono service, she said, adding that it also says a lot about the Delaware Bar, which nominated her. Choices:  1. They put an emphasis on pro bono cases which was why she was nominated for the honor. 2. He won the award even though he did not do any pro bono cases in years. 3. She was humble to be considered for the award.
[EX A]:
1