In this task, you're given a statement, and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence clearly disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3' corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.

Statement: where my medical where it was worth it to itemize for medical expenses because they were just they were that much of a percentage of my income that it just Choices:  1. With my medical bills it was better to itemise the expenses since it was just a percentage of my income. 2. I didn't bother to itemise my medical expenses, I just took it out of my income.  3. It might be worth it for you to itemise your medical expenses like I did.
2

Statement: seems like uh Steel Magnolias yeah i just watched that yesterday or Sunday i just watched that Choices:  1. I watched Steel Magnolias over a year ago, if I remember well. 2. I watched Steel Magnolias yesterday or on Sunday. 3. I remember Steel Magnolias very well, since I watched it recently.
1

Statement: The New York City Consumer Affairs Commissioner is quoted as saying Mr. Fishbein has a shot at winning the suit because restaurants are allowed to add a service charge for parties larger than six if the customer is told in advance--but the surcharge is limited to 15 percent. Choices:  1. All restaurants automatically add a 15% gratuity for parties of six or more. 2. Restaurants can add an automatic 15% surcharge for large parties 3. If there are less than six at a table, restaurants are allowed to add a 15% surcharge to the bill.

3