We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Input: Consider Input: Sent1: The pre-existing right to keep and bear arms was premised on the commonplace assumption that individuals would use them for these private purposes, in addition to whatever militia service they would be obligated to perform for the state.
 Sent2: It did nothing to prohibit the required militia arms from being used in private concerns (such as hunting) so long as the arms were kept in a state of constant readiness for emergency militia use.

Output: Similar


Input: Consider Input: Sent1: Most gun owners are just ordinary people who happen to own a firearm.
 Sent2: I like guns as much as the normal person does but if guns are abused by people, we need restictions.

Output: Not similar


Input: Consider Input: Sent1: all guns are used for is killing, they are weapons.
 Sent2: people who want to kill, will kill if you ban guns, they will kill with knives, or something else.


Output: Not similar