In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Ex Input:
Comment: Your emotional rant has nothing to do with science, but more with backwoods bias and beliefs.
Geneticist Ste Rikhardsson:
"The word “gender” is from the French word “genre” which means “type, class, kind”.Gender is a psychological construct whereas sex is a physical entity. The word “gender” is used wrongly by most people as a synonym for sex mainly because for 99% of people in the world, the two are the same. But just because they are the same for you, it doesn’t mean it is the same for everyone.
Even though there are two MAIN sexes, there are at least 16 types of sexes among humans. Many of these people are classed as “intersex”. Some people are born with XXY chromosomes or other combinations as well as ambiguous sex organs (sometimes totally ambiguous, sometimes with breasts and a penis, sometimes with a vagina, womb and flat chest, and sometimes with working or non-working sexual organs)."
This isn't "garbage," as you suggest. People are different. Differences should be respected.

Ex Output:
Sexual-explicit


Ex Input:
Comment: Foreigners are buying property everywhere.  It should be a condition of any Asians coming to Canada that they agree to live in underground tunnels that we bore for them.  Living in a tunnel is still way better than living in China.

Ex Output:
Non-sexual-explicit


Ex Input:
Comment: I hate to brag  ( no I don't ), but I told you so---I said if we elected Trump the King Cove emergency road would get built .  Obama and Jewel put birds ahead of human lives. The real stink of it all was they both knew birds wouldn't be hurt by this road . They just wanted to make brownie points with greenies so that's why they chose birds over humans.  By brownie points , I mean get more donations for those groups and themselves. There is zero doubt this road will save human lives.  You'd wonder how can anyone be against that ?  Yet liberals are. I'll bet if an illegal's life was mentioned as being saved by building this emergency road , they'd support it in a second , and claim the road was their idea in the first place.

Ex Output:

Non-sexual-explicit