In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Comment: Burt, when I read or hear about these complaints I can't help but notice that those individuals are either paranoid, incompetent or both. Which is it with you?
Non-obscene

Comment: Your friend Jack has some serious problems.  He claims to be a Christian, he is married and I assume he will say he loves his wife.  How could Jack support a philandering liar like tRump?  And I wonder what it is about America that Jack loves?  He seems to be supporting the destruction of everything worthwhile, from public discourse, our government, our freedoms and our respect.
Non-obscene

Comment: This "rule" is new to me.  Where did it come from?  Was it the 11th Commandment?  Or the 28th amendment of the US Constitution?  Or perhaps it is the 1st rule of Ms. Fawcett's personal and totally subjective version of "Rules for Radicals"?  Or perhaps Ms. Fawcett's "logic" is similar to that of former SCOTUS Justice Potter Stewart who, when asked how he defined pornography, said "I know it when I see it".  I'm so confused!:)   

But can you blame me?  After all, since the terms "fuck you" and "fuck you assholes" have, within my lifetime, been transformed from perhaps the worst things we could say to each other to now totally defanged and democratized parts of everyday speech, how can it be that vertically extending one's middle finger should be "saved" for life-threatening experiences--as if that was still the case even 50 years ago?  The gesture, and its current meaning, date to at least the Roman Empire.  So it seems we should now know MANY things are more offensive--such as war!

Obscene