In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

[Q]: Comment: "It does seem a little hypocritical for Dogwood to be complaining about Kinder Morgan playing a role in the B.C. election through its donations to the BC Liberals, when it is receiving money from the United States to fight for causes aligned with interests there. "
In one case, foreign interests donate money to advocacy groups.
In the other, foreign interests donate money to a political party whose members currently form the provincial government. 
Not even remotely equivalent, Gary, and tf. hardly hypocritical of Dogwood to complain about it.
[A]: Non-obscene


[Q]: Comment: Actually it is clear that they are all crooks regardless of party.
[A]: Non-obscene


[Q]: Comment: Repeal it don't replace it or replace it to what we has before.Before=2500.00 deductible NOW $6850.00 and 100.00 office visits.America got FUCKED
[A]:
Obscene