TASK DEFINITION: In this task, you're given a statement, and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence clearly disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3' corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.
PROBLEM: Statement: An attorney representing a client before judge and jury was no longer the norm of a case when delivering critical legal services to low-income individuals. Choices:  1. Attorneys representing low-income individuals are the norm. 2. The norm of the case was violated when the attorney delivered their services. 3. Low-income individuals are often targeted by the justice system because of their inability to finance their legal battles.

SOLUTION: 1

PROBLEM: Statement: like up at the end of last year where one police officer it was on a drug raid uh was trying to extra extricate um a confession or information from a drug dealer and did so by placing a hot a hot iron on his chest his bare chest burned him Choices:  1. A police officer tried to extricate a confession from a drug dealer by placing a hot iron on his chest. 2. The drug dealer was not harmed by the police officer. 3. A police officer caught a drug dealer on a drug raid.

SOLUTION: 2

PROBLEM: Statement: 'Huh,' Greuze muttered, looking my way. Choices:  1. He looked in the direction opposite of where I was standing. 2. Greuze was looking in my direction.  3. Greuze was wearing a black suit and tie. 

SOLUTION:
1