Given a document, an entity and its sentiment towards the entity, verify if it is the correct sentiment towards the entity. Answer should be yes or no. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

Ex Input:
Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Travis Kalanick is Neutral . SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) - Uber Technologies Incâs [UBER.UL] fractured board declared peace on Tuesday  attempting to put months of strife behind it by unanimously passing a series of measures to shore up corporate governance  bring in major investor SoftBank and diminish the power of former Chief Executive Travis Kalanick.
 Kalanick  described Tuesdayâs actions as âa major step forward in Uberâs journey to becoming a world class public company.â He added that the governance changes should serve Uber well under Dara Khosrowshahi  who is a month into the chief executive officer job since leaving the same post at Expedia Inc (EXPE.O).
Governance policies adopted by the board would make it difficult for  Kalanick  to return as CEO. He resigned in June under pressure from the Benchmark-led investor group over employee sexual harassment investigations  a trade-secrets misappropriation lawsuit by Waymo and efforts to interfere with government probes.
Uberâs board will expand from 11 directors  including a pair of  Kalanick  appointees seated on Monday  to 17 directors  the person and another source said.
 Kalanick  and other early shareholders also are sacrificing voting power  as Uber adopts a one vote per share policy  the sources said.

Ex Output:
yes


Ex Input:
Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Jay Sekulow is Neutral . Jay Sekulow  chief counsel of the American Center for Law and Justice  introduces Republican presidential candidate and former Florida governor Jeb Bush during a presidential candidate forum at Regent University in Virginia Beach  on Oct. 23  2015. (AP Photo/Steve Helber)
Jay Sekulow  a member of the legal team counseling Trump on special counsel Robert S. Mueller III's wide-ranging Russia probe  said Tuesday that a second special counsel should be appointed to focus on FBI and Justice Department investigators.
 Sekulow 's call for a second special counsel was first reported Tuesday morning by Axios.
 Sekulow  did not allege wrongdoing on the part of Mueller or  his  team  telling The Washington Post that  his  call for a second special counsel has ânothing to do with Bob Mueller.â
But  Sekulow  argued that alleged conflicts of interest among FBI and Justice Department officials demand a full investigation by a special counsel.  He  singled out a Fox News report last week that Bruce G. Ohr  a senior Justice Department official  was demoted amid an investigation of  his  contacts with Fusion GPS  the opposition research firm that commissioned a salacious dossier documenting Trump's ties to Russia.
âThis is the kind of situation that  in my view  warrants a special counsel â  Sekulow  said.
Asked whether he was speaking on Trump's behalf or whether the president agrees with having a second special counsel   Sekulow  would not answer.  He  said  he  does not speak publicly about  his  conversations with the president.
 Sekulow  works alongside John M. Dowd  another private attorney for the president  and in close collaboration with Ty Cobb  a White House lawyer who handles the Russia portfolio.

Ex Output:
yes


Ex Input:
Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Larry Summers is Positive . Larry Summers   the treasury secretary during the Clinton administration  said âthousands would dieâ because of the Republican tax plan that is gradually making its way through Congress before President Donald Trump signs it into law as early as this month.
 Summers  said  he  based  his  grim assertion on the work by another economist  Kate Baicker  who served on the Council of Economic Advisers during the administration of President George W. Bush.  She  now is dean of the Harris School of Public Policy at the University of Chicago.
âThe Congressional Budget Office estimated that the tax bill could reduce insurance coverage by 13 million people  which to be conservative we can round down to 10 million people â  Summers  wrote in a blog for the Financial Times. âIf we treat the 176 to 830 range as implying that it is safe to assume that 1 000 more uninsured means one death  the conclusion would follow that the tax bill would result in 10 000 extra deaths per year.â
 Summers  said there are many issues that can affect such an outcome.
While people are still free to buy health insurance even if the federal government doesnât require them to do so   Summers  cites two reasons for why they likely wonât.

Ex Output:

no