We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Q: Sent1: The majority populations of all countries may support the death penalty for some crimes (1).
 Sent2: Over 40 countries have abolished the death penalty for all crimes since 1990.

A: Similar
****
Q: Sent1: Others have said that the death penalty is biblically wrong.
 Sent2: If murder is wrong than so is the death penalty.

A: Similar
****
Q: Sent1: Or you could merely ignore them and concede that the death penalty is flawed, kills innocent people and costs the lives of innocents in the use of how it is funded
 Sent2: An argument for putting people to death is so that they can never escape and kill again.

A:
Not similar
****