In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence can be inferred from the statement. Incorrect choices change the meaning in important ways or have details that are not mentioned in the statement. Indicate your answer as 1,2, or 3 corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.

Statement: A few years later, he developed a fascination with the comely Catherine Oxenberg, then starring in the TV show Dynasty . Salinger traveled to California and had shown up on the set, according to biographer Hamilton. Choices:  1. Salinger took a liking to Catherine Oxenburg when she starred in Dynasty. 2. Salinger never traveled to California in order to show up on a tv set. 3. Salinger liked Oxenberg's character more than Oxenberg herself.
1

Statement: According to the Rochester team, the findings suggest that our language-learning abilities may have to do with our general cognitive prowess, not with any particular language module. Choices:  1. There's a language module that aids us in our ability to learn a new language. 2. The team at Rochester doesn't have any ideas concerning the basis of learning new languages. 3. A person's general intelligence may be related to the ability to learn a new language according to the team from Rochester.
3

Statement: Kinda free with a gun, leastwise at showin' it. Choices:  1. Due to the lax laws, they behave freely with a gun. 2. They are very strict and disciplined about gun usage. 3. They are showing that they are free with a gun.

3