Given a document, an entity and its sentiment towards the entity, verify if it is the correct sentiment towards the entity. Answer should be yes or no. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].
--------
Question: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Clinton is Positive . Rep. Mark Meadows (R-NC) said a meeting revealed in the House Intelligence Committee memo released Friday shows that  the Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee  likely knew about the dossier  despite  their  denials.
The memo revealed that the law firm representing the  Clinton  campaign and the DNC  Perkins Coie  hosted âat least oneâ meeting in Washington  D.C. in 2016 with dossier author Christopher Steele  Fusion GPS  and media outlets  in which the dossierâs research was discussed.
According to Meadows  Perkins Coie could likely not have hosted the meeting without getting its clientâs permission â in this case  the  Clinton  campaign and the DNC â due to attorney-client privilege. Attorney-client privilege would give the  Clinton  campaign and the DNC control over what Perkins Coie could share with other parties â especially the media.
âI canât imagine that a law firm would set that up and bring in the media without knowledge of some individual within the DNC or the  Hillary Clinton  campaign directing them to do so  because it would break an attorney-client privilege to bring in the media and allow that to be exposed without that happening â Meadows said during a conference call with reporters about the memo on Friday.
The  Clinton  campaign paid Perkins Coie $5.6 million from June 2015  and the DNC paid Fusion GPS $3.65 million beginning in November 2015  according to the Washington Post. Obama for America also paid Fusion GPS $972 000 since April 2016  according to The Federalist.
Even after that   Clinton    her  top campaign and DNC officials denied knowing they were paying for the dossier.  Former Clinton campaign manager Robby Mook  told CNN that  he  was unaware that the  Clinton  campaign was paying Fusion GPS.
âI didnât know that we were paying the contractor that created that document â  Mook  told CNN on November 3  2017.
 Former Clinton Campaign Chairman John Podesta  also told Senate Intelligence Committee investigators last year that  he  did not know they were paying for the dossier  according to CNN.

Answer: yes


Question: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Trumper is Negative . Thatâs not too far of a fling  actually. One really bad move could do it  but  Trump  has insulated  himself  with people far more competent and worthy of  their  positions. To date   they âre keeping  him  from stepping over the edge.
I never thought he could do the job. Heâs made some solid moves in his first year in office  but I actually give the credit to those around him. As I said from the beginning  it was the Cabinet that would do the actual work  and much like his business dealings   Trump  would be the Ronald McDonald of politics.  He âs the face of the presidency  but the actual work is being done by somebody else.
Wolff leans to some old rumors in the book about Trumpâs campaign plans. Namely   he  never intended to be president.  He  was going to clean up by being the almost president  build up a ready-made audience  and launch a new TV network venture  TrumpTV.
Because nobody thought  he  would win  nobody prepared for the job. In fact  while  Trump  bragged openly to  his  glassy-eyed followers that  he âd finance  his  own campaign and be beholden to none (How many times did I hear a Trumper say  â He  canât be bought!â)   he  put very little of  his  own money into the campaign.  He  took donations  like every other candidate  but to this day  not a single  Trump  supporter can be convinced of that.
 He  didnât run  his  campaign like somebody that wanted to win. It was a show to  him .  He  was worthless in debates  because  he  obviously didnât understand the questions being asked of  him   but  his  base would flood online polls and declare  him  the winner  even before the debates were over (which tells me they didnât understand the questions  either  nor did they care).
 Trump  struck out at Wolff on Friday night (on Twitter  of course)  slamming  him  as a âloserâ and calling  his  book âboring and untruthful.â
Ok. Wolff  however  is thanking  Trump  for helping  him  sell books  which  in turn  is opening eyes.

Answer: no


Question: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Daniel Pinto is Positive . Daniel Pinto's eyes lit up.
Daniel Pinto: I think that it is about momentum. If you look at 2016  the whole industry had a weaker-than-expected first quarter  and then the momentum gathered from the second quarter to the third quarter  and it continues into the fourth quarter  obviously with the normal seasonality. The fourth quarter is typically weaker than the third quarter  but the momentum continues. That 15% year-on-year increase in markets isn't different than what we saw in the previous quarters.
 Pinto : There's been a strong performance in rates  in emerging markets  in credit â it's all along the fixed-income complex.
 Pinto : When you listen to  his  potential policies  the market reaction is pretty much the mirror image of what  he  might do.
When you listen to  his  potential policies  the market reaction is pretty much the mirror image of what  he  might do.
 He  is pro-US growth  so therefore what you have is higher interest rates and the potential for the Fed to be more aggressive than it would have been otherwise. The equity-market valuations we're seeing aren't low  but there could be additional momentum  particularly in financials. It is not such a surprise.
Turner: There is an argument that the market has priced in all of the best bits of  his  policies and ignored some of the potential negative consequences.
 Pinto : We've been doing a lot of work. Some portions of the business are more electronic than they used to be  and that process may continue. For me  I've made it very clear  it is a business where success relates to your scale. To maintain your success  you have to maintain your scale. To maintain your scale  you have to adjust to however your clients want to execute. That is why David Hudson  who runs markets execution services  is creating an environment for the clients to execute through us in any way they want. That is not over. It will continue. We will continue to adjust because we're mirroring what our clients want.
 Pinto : The SEF aggregator is something we built  and no one uses it. Maybe they will one day. The world for me â the way I see it  for asset managers  more and more of their business is going to passive. That is the trend. Margins are compressing. Efficiency in the way they execute is more and more important  and so we need to face that. We need new ways to do things that are more effective for them.
 Pinto : This is fully loaded ROE for all the business lines in fixed income. This is what we produce. This line is the cost of capital  and every single business  on a fully loaded basis  is delivering a return ahead of the cost of capital  except for commodities  which is going through a process of adjustment. The most important part is if you were to eliminate one of those  not all of the capital goes away  not all of the cost goes away  so essentially the marginal impact  the ROE you would lose by closing the business  is far higher than 15%. That's why  for me  the completeness is very important.
 Pinto : It is shared infrastructure. Revenue flows go away  but capital related to operational and credit risk doesn't. That doesn't change just because you close a line of business. It just gets reassigned to different businesses. That's why when you start cutting you say  "I don't like rates â I'm going to cut rates " well  the marginal ROE of what is left is worse. And as you cut more  it gets worse and worse. In my view  when you start trying to cut costs in this type of business  you don't know when you'll stop cutting. The more you do  the more painful it will become â all in an environment where the wallet has been shrinking.
 Pinto : That's absolutely true. An example of that is equities. We will see how it plays out when equities goes into a down cycle. Everyone said  "We'll cut fixed income and focus all of our energy on protecting our equities franchise." Fine. Equities was growing. Now we have the first year where the equities wallet shrinks  and we may have another one. I don't know.
 Pinto : We look at client profitability on a long-term basis  not just this year. We measure quite accurately all of the resources we provide to the clients  capital  liquidity  the cost of everything  and then we give them credit for the resources they provide to us. They could leave their deposits with us. And then any other business we do  we calculate a marginal ROE  an absolute ROE  and we look at cycles rather than just one year. What it does is it gives you information to manage the relationship with the client. You can sit down with the client and say  "This is what it is  over the last number of years it has been X " so they know where they stand with us. It helps the salespeople to have an intelligent conversation with the client.
 Pinto : It is often easier when you partner with someone  make some progress  and then bring other people in  rather than getting a bunch of banks together and get them developing something from zero.
 Pinto : I think that in order to attract talent  you have to run the company in a way that is appealing to them. That's why we have a clear technology strategy  and have communicated externally about how vibrant and flexible JPMorgan is. It's a way to attract top talent into the organization. The more people you hire from top tech companies  the more talent comes along with them. You have to do what is right  and you have to communicate it too. The reality is that it is a vibrant institution  we're looking forward  we're successful  so therefore people want to join. We haven't had a problem attracting talent. Seventy-seven percent of our new hires into the corporate and investment bank last year were millennials  and they already make up more than 50% of the organization.

Answer:
yes