Given scene/plot descriptions from movies or TV shows, and given a specific question about the scene, summarize the question into a title

Example Input: I've noticed a trend recently where, in a particularly violent scene, blood will end up on the lens of the camera. It's not restricted to blood; it could be water, if it's a particularly stormy scene, or mud in, say, a battle. Any kind of liquid, really. The point is that the scene is usually pretty charged.  Has this become fashionable and, if so, why? I don't recall seeing this as much when I was younger -- but maybe I just didn't notice -- and, for me, it breaks the suspension of disbelief. I presume the production team are in control of the filming enough such that they can choose if or when this happens, rather than it being accidental. Is it a meta thing to try to suggest to the viewer that the scene is so chaotic, that even the producers can't control it?
Example Output: Blood on the lens

Example Input: In Flash season 4 episode 18 (Lose Yourself) Devoe attack star labs and take the powers of all bus metas. He even takes away the power of Killer Frost. He could easily take the power away from Barry as he was laying on the floor or he could absorb his power too. Same in the case for Cisco.  So why didnt Devoe takes Flash's power?  Is it because Devoe can only absorb the powers of the bus metas?
Example Output: Why didn't Devoe take Barry's power?

Example Input: Jon Snow from Game of Thrones is a man of honor. When he killed the dragon queen in S08E06, he didn't even escape but told the truth. But then why did he kill her with a back stab? Not literally, but he kissed her and she didn't know that he has a weapon.  I understand that maybe he couldn't kill her another way, but that's not a very honorable anyway.
Example Output:
Why did Jon Snow do this immoral act if he is so honorable?