TASK DEFINITION: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
PROBLEM: Comment: Picard is fighting a desperate rearguard action against the assumptive privatization of public space. In recent decades, planners eliminated public phones and clocks on the assumption that everyone carries a cell phone, omitted drinking fountains on the assumption that visitors bring their water in plastic bottles, and ignored shaded seating on the assumption that people are always only a few steps away from their air-conditioned vehicle. The logical final step is to forget public washrooms, leaving it to some entrepreneur to invent a portable plastic potty with a suitable modesty cape to wrap around the waist. 
A pedestrian trip into our public spaces is like a trek into the wilderness. Anything you need you must bring with you or chance purchasing from traders you may encounter there. The public is not at home in its public spaces.
I'm with Picard. Let's build public washrooms as part of a re-civilization of our cities. Build for people, not cars.

SOLUTION: Agree

PROBLEM: Comment: No, Munoz, you are most certainly wrong.  Very wrong.   The "media storm" is NOT perpetuating the hurt of those victims.  What you did hurt them.   And all other victims of sexual abuse.   The message you sent to those victims was that they were not worth protecting,  that you support the predators over them.  You sent a powerful message to other predators too.  You implied what they do is okay with you.  You took measures to show support for them.  Under the law.  What you did was to make Alaska a predator friendly state.   The rights of those suffering from child sexual abuse are not negotiable.  Ever.

SOLUTION: Agree

PROBLEM: Comment: Cultural appropriation is a scam.  Nobody owns a culture, and all cultures are continuously changing over time from absorbing bits from other cultures or simply from internally preferences.
The whole point of the cultural appropriation dogma and rhetoric is to wallow in victimhood and to control what others can say and do.

SOLUTION:
Agree