We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

Example Input: Lying in compliance and trusting two criminals to feel that it's not necessary to harm anyone, or actually do something that can lead to stopping the dangerous individuals before they have the opportunity to harm someone?
Example Output: Valid

Example Input: The second amendment is not primarily there to protect our right to keep hunting weapons.
Example Output: Valid

Example Input: Attacking a person who happens to have no weapon while you have a knife would make you a clear candidate for the penitentiary.
Example Output:
Valid