instruction:
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
question:
I'm tired of reading from various prominent state leaders, not the legislators, that we need "new revenue."  OK, Fran, what new revenue?  You've served in plenty of high caliber appointed position inside and outside of Alaska, surely you can do better than beat around the bush.  The only new revenue that's been kicked around in op-eds is taxes:  Tax the PFD, income tax, education head tax ranging from $100-$500 depending on one's income, additional fuel tax, marijuana tax, more cigarette tax, and a statewide sales tax.  No on new revenue taxes until the Legislature cuts $50 million from its own budget, and repeals SB21 tax credits.
answer:
No


question:
"Unaffiliated voters for the most part tossed their ballots in the trash or the recycling bin, the data show."

I don't think the data even address how voters disposed of their ballots. Perhaps they burned them or used them as birdcage liner. Perhaps they are saving them for another election day, hoping to get in the last word. Maybe Lucy Vinis was just excited to see her name in print and she autographed and framed several copies for her friends.

The tally was heavily buoyed, by the way.
answer:
No


question:
Only because he knows that first and foremost,

 'It's about America... Stupid'.

Everything else is completely secondary.
answer:

Yes