In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
--------
Question: Comment: If a judge could reasonably decide that in some cases, gender signifiers – even on a birth certificate – violate a child’s human rights, then might a judge also reasonably decide that a parent who arbitrarily imprints their extreme gender identity bias on their children's birth certificates are also violating that child's human rights?

Answer: Agree


Question: Comment: If a Canadian person were to paint like the French impressionists, would that person be committing cultural appropriation? Would people scream it is unacceptable?

If a French person were to paint like the Canadian Group of Seven, would that person be committing cultural appropriation? Would that be unacceptable?

If eastern foreigners or indigenous people in Canada adopt western language and styles of writing and western ways, would that be cultural appropriation? Should that be unnaceptable?

When is adopting some of ways of another culture acceptable and when is it unaccptable?

What do the Metis say?

And isn't immitation the finest form of flattery?

Answer: Agree


Question: Comment: Will Alaskans reject Miller again? One can only hope.

Answer:
Agree