In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine the neutral choice based on your inference from the statement and your commonsense knowledge. The neutral choice is a sentence that neither agrees nor disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3', corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence. If sentence X agrees with sentence Y, one's correctness follows from the other one. If sentence X disagrees with sentence Y, they can not be correct at the same time.
--------
Question: Statement: New illumination was installed in 1985 to light up the tower from within, and it was the obvious main focus of France's celebrations for the change of the millennium in 1999. Choices: 1. The New Illumination was installed to light up the Eiffel Tower.   2. The New Illumination was not in place to celebrate the new millennium.   3. The New Illumination was the main focus for the new millennium celebrations.  

Answer: 1


Question: Statement: Of the 700,000 to 1 million people who are eligible for legal aid services in his combined area, Dudovitz estimated that he will serve more than 30,000 annually. Choices: 1. Dudovitz will serve over 30,000 people eligible for legal aid services in his area annually.   2. Dudovitz serves over 50,000 people eligible for legal aid services in his area annually. 3. The people eligible for legal aid services in Dudovitz's area that won't be served him will be served by others like him.

Answer: 3


Question: Statement: Excess emissions penalty Choices: 1. There is a penalty for excess emissions. 2. Excess emissions do not exist. 3. The penalty is charged after a test is performed to determine the amount of emissions.

Answer:
3