Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.

Q: This is just another of Nathan's veiled defenses of homophobia. My gay friends can't be holy unless they go straight or celibate.  This isn't a "challenge" this is prejudice pure and simple.

Imago Dei = Westboro Church without the colorful signs.  

Having said that, let's all have a moment of silence for Jules Bailey's political career.  May it rest in peace.  Ashes to ashes, dust to dust, defeat on election day.

A: Yes
****
Q: I hope he recovers OK.

A: No
****
Q: Wow, good job Dermot. This is a result of a fiscal policy, buy now, pay later while using other peoples money. Shifting the burden is part of this policy. Oh, dear, or how inconvenient the private sector can be with having to account for dollars and making ends meet before justifying taking the loan. Policy makers might learn to do as well. I hope they will or...how many billion is this obligation upside down on?

A:
No
****