We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Q: Sent1: Last time I checked, killing doesn't bring persons back to life, so the only reason for the death penalty seems to be revenge.
 Sent2: With all that it has been a very trying time for me and I have had to struggle with how I really felt about the death penalty.

A: Not similar
****
Q: Sent1: Most people would agree that someone who kills someone in self defense doesn't deserve the death penalty, but there have been a couple of recent cases where someone killed someone in revenge for molesting their children.
 Sent2: No letting the family or friends of the victim kill the convicted person might be childish revenge.

A: Not similar
****
Q: Sent1: >_> Says the person who brought up freaking Nelson in a debate about the death penalty for murders.
 Sent2: Last time I checked, killing doesn't bring persons back to life, so the only reason for the death penalty seems to be revenge.

A:
Not similar
****