In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Input: Consider Input: Comment: Astonishing comments on this thread. The C series was a remarkable achievement for a mid sized country like Canada and showed the level of technological expertise in aerospace. Name me any other country in the world apart from the USA that has even come close to this achievement. Airbus is multi country and Embraer is revamping old technology. Why shouldn't Canada play an important role within Airbus?
There will be more jobs in Alabama if the US market opens up but the new company with all its strengths could sell twice as much in the rest of the world where 70% of the market is  bringing more jobs to Canada. If Trump is happy about this deal which considerably strengthens Boeing's only real competitor the he is the fool I always thought he was.

Output: Non-sexual-explicit


Input: Consider Input: Comment: And...uh...free Hillary's child sex slaves at Comet Ping Pong!

Output: Sexual-explicit


Input: Consider Input: Comment: THERE WAS A "DICKS"  IN KENT ONCE, IT IS NOW THE SITE OF A PAPA MURPHY'S....IT WAS CALLED GHORM'S AND WAS RUN BY A FAMILY MEMBER AS I WAS TOLD.....THEN IT WAS SOLD/LEASED ?  TO ANOTHER OWNER/OPERATOR.  THEN IT WAS TURNED INTO A PAPA MURPHY'S ACROSS FROM THE DOLLAR STORE ON 256TH JUST EAST OF THE BENSON.......HMMMMM, DICKS, HMMMMMM, LONG SHOT........


Output: Sexual-explicit