In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: toxic and non-toxic. Toxicity is defiend as anything that is rude, disrespectful, or unreasonable that would make someone want to leave a converation.

Ex Input:
Comment: Mark Braudis rented my house for a couple of years while I was stationed outside (99-00)

He incurred 20K in damage when it was all said and done. The damage was indicative of domestic violence--fist, knee, and elbow holes in the walls and nearly every door had a fist hole.  He skipped out the last two months rent and was nearly forcibly evicted.

He bragged about screwing other landlords and dared me to sue him.

That said I'm glad to see his kids have overcome their upbringing and the tragic death of their mother.

Maybe Mark's a better person now.

Ex Output:
Non-toxic


Ex Input:
Comment: We know how to control costs and provide affordable healthcare to every American citizen. But we don't because conservatives and conservatism continue their rabid protection of our private insurance-based debacle of a system, the most inefficient in the world. There's a reason why nobody anywhere on the planet has ever uttered the words, "let's base our healthcare system on the American model"?

Every single variation of a single-payer system has proven to be more efficient than ours but conservatives call it "socialism" so no way no how are we doin' that. And once an idea gets planted in the conservative mind nothing, not facts not irrefutable and overwhelming evidence, is going change it. 

Single-payer is the solution, not deregulation, not selling insurance across state lines, not tort reform. Unfortunately healthcare reform in American has met the immovable object: the conservative mind.

Ex Output:
Non-toxic


Ex Input:
Comment: Quod erat demonstrandum

Ex Output:

Non-toxic