In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

[Q]: Comment: I wonder what old white guys think is worse, having a black president or woman president.  Up here in the chow halls it's been 7 plus years of its obamas fault that they are all neutered toothless hillbillies.  It will be interesting to see and hear how they cry if a woman is elected president.  A curious phenomenon occurs every time a black man walks in the chow hall, the loud crying about Obama stops.  All loud and proud as long as no minorities are around.
[A]: Non-obscene


[Q]: Comment: why would an international body need to step into our country's affairs to provide cover for the Librano plan? did the locals (meaning Canadians not come up with the right info for the Librano crew to sell their policy to the masses) or is it that the Keynesians at the IMF were the only ones qualified to provide this 'high level' of expert advice
'it approximates that .......' that was all I needed to read to know the report was bunk - why wasnt it done with census data to have a real picture rather than this line of shit - but that is all we seem to get from the​ Libranos and their supporters - shit
[A]: Obscene


[Q]: Comment: Child, please. Trump's cult members have no leg to stand on when trying to criticize someone ELSE for being unethical.
[A]:
Non-obscene