We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Input: Consider Input: Why not just work to reform the justice system, instead of working to stop the death penalty, then working to reform the justice system, and THEN working to reinstitute the death penalty.

Output: Valid


Input: Consider Input: If these bleak prospects aren't enough to deter someone from committing a serious crime, what will ramping it up to the death penalty do?

Output: Valid


Input: Consider Input: The definitions of terms I used were a simplistic formulation of those found in texts, with differing points enhanced.


Output: Invalid