In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.
--------
Question: Comment: That both groups might or might not have committed violent acts is beside the point, the point being that what the white supremacist group stands for is not acceptable to decent people. Are you saying that emphasizing that black lives matter is unacceptable? Indeed you do, as you are a racist since way back.

Answer: Non-sexual-explicit


Question: Comment: No. You say he's made cakes for gay people before. You claim that as fact. How many has he made?

Nice buzzwords. Sounds to me like this man's faith "triggers" you. Why is it you "SJWs" never want your justice for the Christians?

Answer: Non-sexual-explicit


Question: Comment: anybody else notice that every time things get hot in Ottawa, Glamour Boy skips out till things cool down and the threat thrower Chagger needs to take her own advice and cool down but I predict the threat she issued in the house will be swept under the rug just like Elbowgate cuz its 2017 and the ethics commissioner just got a new deal to protect Librano ass

Answer:
Sexual-explicit