We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Example Input: Sent1: The reasons given most often for supporting the death penalty are emotional reasons of retribution for the heinous acts of the criminal.
 Sent2: If you accept vengeance as a reason for punishment then I understand why you would support the death penalty.
Example Output: Similar

Example Input: Sent1: You need to find lots more for the death penalty to save more lives than innocents that have been executed by it.
 Sent2: There has been so much cases of people who have been executed, only to be found innocent after their death.
Example Output: Not similar

Example Input: Sent1: Acutally, long ago, the executioner was a convict also sentenced to death.
 Sent2: The person having been convicted of a crime punishable by death and subsequently sentenced to death should be put to death.
Example Output:
Not similar