In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

Example Input: Sentence: The sculpture rolled off the shelf because it wasn't level.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the shelf because the artwork was shipped by a company called 'A.W. Ketcham, Inc.'. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Example Output: Wrong

Example Input: Sentence: Jane gave Joan candy because she was hungry.
 Reason: The 'she' refers to joan because you could give candy to a hungry person. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Example Output: Correct

Example Input: Sentence: Sam tried to paint a picture of shepherds with sheep, but they ended up looking more like dogs.
 Reason: The 'they' refers to the sheep because the shepherds are people and would be more likely to look like golfers. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Example Output:
Wrong