TASK DEFINITION: In this task, you will be presented with a context from an academic paper and a question separated with a 
. You have to answer the question based on the context.
PROBLEM: We crowdsourced multiple-choice questions in two parts, encouraging workers to be imaginative and varied in their use of language. First, workers were given a seed qualitative relation q+/-( INLINEFORM0 ) in the domain, expressed in English (e.g., “If a surface has more friction, then an object will travel slower”), and asked to enter two objects, people, or situations to compare. 
 Question: Do all questions in the dataset allow the answers to pick from 2 options?

SOLUTION: Yes

PROBLEM:  More generally, we know little about the types of development issues that different countries prioritise, or whether country-specific factors such as wealth or democracy make countries more likely to push for specific development issues to be put on the global political agenda.  We find that discussion of Topic 2 is not significantly impacted by country-specific factors, such as wealth, population, democracy, levels of ODA, and conflict (although there are regional effects).  
 Question: What are the country-specific drivers of international development rhetoric?

SOLUTION: wealth  democracy  population levels of ODA conflict 

PROBLEM: As we only extracted references to other judicial decisions, we obtained 471,319 references from Supreme Court decisions, 167,237 references from Supreme Administrative Court decisions and 264,463 references from Constitutional Court Decisions. These are numbers of text spans identified as references prior the further processing described in Section SECREF3. 
 Question: How big is the dataset?

SOLUTION:
903019 references