instruction:
In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: threat and non-threat. Threat is a statement that someone will be hurt or harmed, especially if the person does not do something in particular.
question:
Comment: And of course, the upcoming election will remind Canadians how the Liberals lied about electoral reform. Unlike the Harper government, this is a craven gang that hopes to quietly sell out the country to plutocrats and corporations while no one is looking. Trudeau is a pathetic neoliberal stooge peddling a discredited ideology. "Sunny ways" is the same trickle down economics delivered with a smile and patronizing condescension.
answer:
Non-threat


question:
Comment: Here we have a protected minority maliciously and publicly mocking another person for their religious beliefs.  Anyone else see the epic hypocrisy in that?   We all know that if the driver was a Muslim imam, JJ would NEVER say anything derogatory about him, in spite of the fact that Islam is radically misogynistic and homophobic.  Scratching my head.
answer:
Non-threat


question:
Comment: "President Donald Trump can return to the United States claiming to have snagged over $250-billion in deals from his maiden trip to Beijing. 

Whether those deals live up to the lofty price tag is another question altogether.

As is often the case during state visits, many of the deals were packaged as "non-binding" agreements, gave scant details or rolled over existing tie-ups, helping pump up the headline figure."

--

If this follows the pattern of other Trump "deals", it will just prove to be a lot of bombast and hot air.

Trump's greatest industrial policy so far has been to produce a lot of gas.

The Moron-In-Chief thinks that the rest of the world are as gullible as the Trumpenproletariat that he's suckered.
answer:

Non-threat