In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence can be inferred from the statement. Incorrect choices change the meaning in important ways or have details that are not mentioned in the statement. Indicate your answer as 1,2, or 3 corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.
--------
Question: Statement: A Washington Post piece bathed her in golden  She hopes to go to graduate school in sociology, she's scrimping because she doesn't want to burden her parents financially, she is so much a hostage to the media that she couldn't attend her own mom's wedding, and--the icing on the cake--she has taken up knitting. Choices:  1. The New York Times was the newspaper that opted to bathe her in gold. 2. She wanted to study sociology in graduate school so that she could explain people's behaviors. 3. She didn't want to put the financial burden on her parents so she took to scrimping and extreme saving.

Answer: 3


Question: Statement: With respect to section 604(a)(2), the analysis issued with the final rule states that HCFA received no comments on the methodology used in its initial analysis. Choices:  1. The analysis issued with the final rule says the HCFA got 10,000 comments. 2. The analysis issued with the final rule says the HCFA didn't get any comments on the website. 3. The analysis issued with the final rule says the HCFA didn't get any comments.

Answer: 3


Question: Statement: Do you think we can go back to being really good friends sans frolic? Choices:  1. I miss being your friend. 2. Can we be friends again? 3. I never want to see you again!

Answer:
2