In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

[Q]: Comment: Wow! If you think this article represents "common sense truth seeking" you really need to go back to the drawing board. This woman is a dishonest extremist who trades in propagandist lies.
[A]: Non-sexual-explicit


[Q]: Comment: Your name fits you.....DICK!
[A]: Sexual-explicit


[Q]: Comment: What felony did Mr Trump admit to, or does felonious behavior not require a felony now?

We do not see a charge in front of a Judge, well less conviction by Jury to dismiss.

We do see a lot of people that want to be GOD, Judge and Jury all wrapped up into one, wanting to cast the first stone.

Is gravity deflected in the many locker room talks, that maybe even you may have been involved in?  We have all heard much worse than Mr Trump's comments, from females.

Should the gravity not also be defined by the over 50% of applications for protective orders that are dismissed before even entering the process or the over 50% of those remaining dismissed without proof of abuse?  Mostly from females?  Who is actually being harassed and assaulted?

Do your actions help or hinder within such needed preemptive Civility?  Do you help protect anyone or do you get paid for it?  Just asking.
[A]:
Non-sexual-explicit