In this task, you must classify if a given review is positive/negative, indicating your answer as P or N.

Example Input: steve soderbergh 's " sex , lies , and videotape , " which won the grand prize at the cannes film festival in 1989 , arguably began the resurgence of independent films .
made on a shoestring budget of $ 1 . 2 million , with then relatively unknown actors , it is a provocative , thoroughly original drama .
the film mostly focuses on the four central characters , all in their late 20's - early 30 's .
ann ( andie macdowell ) , an unfulfilled housewife , is married to john ( peter gallagher ) , an insensitive lawyer , who , unbeknownst to her , is having an affair with her younger sister , cynthia ( laura san giacomo ) .
complicating matters even worse is graham ( james spader , who won best actor at cannes ) , john 's old college buddy , who comes to stay at their house .
ann is absolutely won over by him , even though she clearly has stated that she has very little interest in sex .
that is the set - up for the last hour of the picture , and since the film is entitled , " sex , lies , and videotape , " it is best to keep the rest of the story developments at bay so that they will come as a genuine surprise .
director steven soderbergh has proven to be a wildly offbeat filmmaker , ranging from the independent , to the mainstream ( 1998 's " out of sight " ) , to the downright kafkaesque ( 1997 's " schizopolis " ) .
he is the type of director who obviously takes a lot of chances , and believes in the work that he does , and , " sex , lies , and videotape , " is probably his most confident , and maybe even best , to date .
the performances are superb from all four leads , but macdowell stands out in what is probably the main character .
she is always a very winning actress , but this is probably her most three - dimensional role that she has had ( with a close second being altman 's 1993 mosaic , " short cuts " ) .
the other parts are perfectly cast as well , from spader 's ominous graham , to gallagher 's self - involved john , to giacomo 's outspoken cynthia .
the final act of the film , especially , comes right out of left field , and turns out to be both shocking and oddly touching , and it would be criminal to give away the film 's secrets .
suffice to say that , through one powerful sequence , ann is able to somewhat come out of her shell , and john learns a valuable lesson about honesty , as well as deception .
the film has one fault , however .
the characters are almost all emotionally cold and isolated from one another , and often unlikable .
if there had been a few extra scenes with gallagher , it probably would have helped , since his relationship with macdowell is n't quite as explored as i would have liked .
"
sex , lies , and videotape , " although minorly flawed , is still easily a brave and adult motion picture that is far more mature and honest about its subject matter than the usual film .
soderbergh clearly knew what he was doing while he was making it , and the final product certainly proves this .
Example Output: P

Example Input: gregg araki 's the doom generation was
possibly the very worst film ever made .
so why did i see his latest teen bisexual angst opus ?
first of all , some of the reviews were fairly positive .
also , the cast , consisting of cameos from dozens of washed up
ex
tv stars ( including christopher knight , eve plumb , shannen doherty , and david leisure ) was promising .
last of all , i wanted to give arraki one more chance .
i mean , the guy ca n't be that untalented , can he ?
the answer to that question is three letters long .
nowhere follows the character dark on his wild and odd journey through los angeles .
since arraki does n't know how to make anything coherent , it 's hard to describe the plot .
let 's just say that dark spends the bulk of the movie whining that his girlfriend wo n't make a commitment to him and jealous because she sleeps around with other guys and girls .
the only remotely compelling storyline involves sarah lassez as a teen who has a chance encounter with a famous tv star .
he turns out to be a nice guy who does n't care for fame and wishes he could walk down the street without being mobbed by fans .
this story has a shocking twist and a tragic end that i did not see coming .
it is the first time i ever felt any compassion for a character created by arraki , and this can be attributed to the appealing performance of lassez .
i thought maybe arraki was improving in his craft .
he works better with the camera this time around , especially in the early scenes .
halfway through the film , i did n't necessarily find myself enjoying the film , but it seemed like a considerable improvement on the doom generation .
then as the movie went on , arraki loses all sensibility and introduces us to exploding heads , twisted sex games , and alien abductions .
it 's sad , because he almost actually had some decent material here , but he ruined it with his usual in your face
" i 'm such a renegade maverick filmmaker , look what i can do " attitude .
the performances are generally better than in the doom generation , which is n't saying much .
at least we do n't have to suffer jonathan
" i am the most hideous man in america " schaech .
we are , however treated to another round of james " i 'm more wooden than keanu " duval .
sarah lassez gives the best performance in the film , and kathleen robertson ( formerly of 90210 and now arraki 's wife ) and rachel true are talented actresses caught up in this mess . of the tv star cameos , john ritter is the most interesting as a deranged right wing tv evangelist .
if i prefer nowhere to the doom generation , it is only in the way that i would prefer being assassinated than receive constant physical torture .
maybe greg arraki does n't want you to like his characters .
maybe he wants to laugh and make fun of those of us who try to care about them .
maybe he just wanted to piss me off .
if so , he was successful .
Example Output: N

Example Input: i 'm going to start this review off with a hypothetical question .
let 's say you 've just been in a car accident , and the driver of the other vehicle is unconscious .
your friends have left to go get help , and you 're waiting to see if the victim wakes up .
a tow - truck comes along , and the driver hops out of the truck to see what 's going on .
he then proceeds to kill the unconscious victim by snapping his neck .
do you : a ) run away screaming for your life , staying away from the main road , b )
run away ( but not too fast ) and stay on the main road even when the madman in the truck starts following you ,
* stop * to catch your breath , try to negotiate with the psycho , and when that fails , start running away again , all the while * staying on the main road * ? if you answered " a " , you are far more intelligent than the screenwriter of " texas chainsaw massacre : the next generation " and will likely hate this movie . however , if you answered " b " , prepare to enjoy a film made with idiots like you in mind !
" texas chainsaw massacre :
the next generation " is being called a sequel , but it 's really more of a remake of the original .
there 's a few changes here and there , but it 's essentially the same ( even the infamous " meathook " scene has been re - created . )
the story opens with four teenagers hitting the road on the night of their prom , and somehow ending up in the middle of nowhere .
needless to say , they soon encounter leatherface and his nutty family .
much carnage ensues .
to call this movie inept would be putting it mildly .
in addition to the laughably idiotic situation i mentioned in my hypothetical question , there is a moment towards the end of the film where one of the baddies is killed by an airplane that literally comes out of nowhere .
it just swoops down and kills him with its wheel .
no explantion is given as to who was flying it or why he / she is going around killing people with the planes wheel .
the dialogue is even more atrocious .
zellwegger , who is kidnapped by " the family " early on , keeps trying to have normal conversations with these people .
when you 're surrounded by maniacs wielding chainsaws and dead corpses , i would think that rationality would go out the window .
speaking of going out the window , there is a scene in which zellwegger jumps out a window .
apparently , the stunt double had a little trouble , because she visibly gets stuck in the window .
the director quickly cuts to a wide shot where the stunt double * does n't * get caught in the window .
this was one of many glaring inconsistencies .
there are so many , in fact , that if i were to name them all , this review would be several pages long .
the only reason i am giving this movie one star instead of no stars is because of matthew mcconaughey .
he plays a member of " the family " with a hydraulic leg ( home - made , i might add ) and is so completely over - the - top , you ca n't help but be amazed by his performance .
he obviously had a lot of fun with this part , and it really shows .
he makes jack nicholson 's portrayal of the psychotic inn keeper in " the shining " look restrained in comparison .
for a horror movie , " texas chainsaw massacre : the next generation " contains surprisingly little gore .
in fact , in contains none .
there 's a little blood here and there , but that 's as far as it goes .
which leads me to believe that the budget must have been * astonishingly * low , and it shows .
everything about the movie looks cheap , from the sets to the costumes .
especially leatherface .
once frightening and nightmare inducing , he 's now as terrifying as dame edna .
do yourself a favor and take a pass at this remake . check out the far superior original instead .
Example Output:
N