In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

[Q]: Comment: Slim- illegals, criminal illegals and wannabe dreamers.
How's that working for you this morning?
[A]: Non-identity-attack


[Q]: Comment: I've been wondering myself whether we were going to see the Dictator or the Blowhard who accomplishes nothing.  Certainly, the latter is preferable.
[A]: Non-identity-attack


[Q]: Comment: To dwell on sexuality alone, as Hefner mostly did, with nods to women's equality, narrows the cause to self-interest.  To build an empire essentially on religious bashing and specialized strategy to make consumerism OK doesn't rank among my great movements of history.—Ken Briggs  Neither does the dysfunctional hierarchy, busy covering up sexual abuses.  For all of that “God is with us” (Zechariah 8:23).  The time will come, and is now here, when people will say, as the cultural pendulum swings back toward center, “Let us go with you, for we have heard that God is with you” (Zechariah 8:23).  “He resolutely determined to journey to Jerusalem” (Luke 9:51), as must all the Faithful in every age and at every time.  Liturgy of the Word, Reading 456, Monday of the Twenty-Sixth Week in Ordinary Time I.
[A]:
Non-identity-attack