instruction:
In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.
question:
Comment: Yes, it the old French and Latin, well before it was recognized as the name of a Sacrement, which also was not recognized until 1000 years ago. Entymology does not change the fact of relationship for those in marriage nor make the bishop any less a petty fool for his advice to his priests. He's still nursing a bad case of sour grapes.
answer:
Non-obscene


question:
Comment: Those of you who write about enviro-hypocrisy and such, please help me out. Just so I know ... 

1. People file a lawsuit because they worry about ozone layers, climate change, species going extinct, polar ice melting, glaciers disappearing and all that. They didn't blow something up or burn something down, they went straight to the channels our society provides for, all orderly and appropriate. What should they do? Just shut up? Because we know better? 

2. Is there any concern for the environment that isn't what you call enviro-hypocrisy? Can a person who lives like the rest of us (drives a car, dresses in clothes, lives in a house, consumes electricity, and exists as a normal person) still want public policies that might slow down the trend without being a hypocrite? Or are only people who run around dressed in leaves and sleeping on the ground entitled to care about these things?
answer:
Non-obscene


question:
Comment: Once again political correctness runs amok.
answer:

Non-obscene