instruction:
In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.
question:
Comment: "How can we create more good-paying jobs? How can we increase employment, especially among prime-age men?" Well, buddy, right there is where you so-called conservatives go bad. You smell like low tide. You really are the party of men and men only. Privileged, entitled, men, You wish to be gods. Fuck off.
answer:
Obscene


question:
Comment: "It does seem a little hypocritical for Dogwood to be complaining about Kinder Morgan playing a role in the B.C. election through its donations to the BC Liberals, when it is receiving money from the United States to fight for causes aligned with interests there. "
In one case, foreign interests donate money to advocacy groups.
In the other, foreign interests donate money to a political party whose members currently form the provincial government. 
Not even remotely equivalent, Gary, and tf. hardly hypocritical of Dogwood to complain about it.
answer:
Non-obscene


question:
Comment: Interesting that the two words "liberal and Progressive", the best adjectives to describe the United State Constitution, are now given revisionist meaning to the point of curses against all human rights activity within the same U.S.  The false dictionary of the White Supremacist, Old South CONfederacy, Neo-CONservative, Neo-Republican dogma determined to destroy the nation to re-establish the Old South Plantation system now called Corporations.  The depth of stupidity and ignorance afoot in the nation is a bottomless pit of lies and deceit from the top on down.  Time for a Revolution to clean house one more time.
answer:

Non-obscene