Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.

Ex Input:
Trump has been slightly evasive in concerns to budgeting plans, but he clearly took heat because he chose not to condemn Putin's appraisal of Trump, instead Trump has stated several times he would encourage Russia to spend $1 mil a bomb to take care of ISIS. Trump has not said who specifically would fund ISIL/ISIS eradication,  though allowing Russia to fight is clearly a solution that would lighten the burden on America's pocketbook.

Ex Output:
No


Ex Input:
Jesus H. Christ, it's about time someone published this! This is the information that need to be plastered on mainstream media.  We will loose this fight and that's a god damn guarantee! It's asshole's who post Youtube videos of their suction dredging and drool over their fucking miniscule amounts of Au in front of the entire world who has fucked us! This Asshole, Dave Mc Cracken and his Happy Camp Methadone patients that go into peoples back yards with their 6" Proline's and dredge their birdbaths because they can is fucking bullshit!!  Happy Camp, California needs to go! he IS the clown that brought ALL of this bullshit from the Left. Why you ask? Well I'll fucking tell you why since no one else will. Seriously, 70 fucking miles this asshole had claimed for his newbies to royally piss off the Karuk not to mention the other people who live up there. NEWSFLASH!! Why didn't HE defy the ban and get arrested in '15 to show the world his stand instead of his brainwashed assholes? Fuck him!

Ex Output:
Yes


Ex Input:
_"arcane and biased nomination process"_

Right. This is the "arcane" process: Most votes = A winner! 

And this is the "inane" expectation: Sanders should be lifted above the voters because of your whining complaints.

Go Hillary! You are going to crush Trump. 

-- Paul

Ex Output:

No