In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence can be inferred from the statement. Incorrect choices change the meaning in important ways or have details that are not mentioned in the statement. Indicate your answer as 1,2, or 3 corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.

Ex Input:
Statement: The thundering Republican condemnations of the special prosecutor back then are just like the thundering Democratic condemnations today, down to the very phrase, four years and $40 million. Choices:  1. The thundering Republic condemnations back then are similar in many ways to the thundering Democratic condemnations of today.  2. The thundering Republican condemnations are in no way similar to the thundering Democratic condemnations. 3. The thundering Republican condemnations are four years and $40 million. 

Ex Output:
3


Ex Input:
Statement: both i think it's it's a matter of both um economics economics has a lot to do with it unfortunately but uh i think a lot of choice has gone into it lately and and most of them or or a lot of women i know would rather Choices:  1. I think that it is true that both are relevant to the situation. 2. It is not at all about economics, and entirely about morality.  3. It is both a matter of economics and morality that are relevant.

Ex Output:
1


Ex Input:
Statement: Jesus was born in Bethlehem in 6 or 5 b.c. (his birth was miscalculated in the sixth century), though it was only in the final three years of his life and ministry that his teachings became a major problem for Jerusalem's rulers. Choices:  1. Jesus was not a bother to the rulers of Jerusalem until the last few years of his life.  2. Jesus lived a long life before his teachings became a major problem for Jerusalem's leaders. 3. Jerusalem's leaders hated Jesus and the threat he posed to them for as long as he lived. 

Ex Output:

1