In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.

Example Input: Comment: You say we cannot afford her - which is true - but you also encourage her to resign. This would give the Liberals a chance to reinvent themselves, pin the ills of the past few years on her, and win the next election (with a bit of support from their deep-pocketed union friends, of course).

Can we afford that outcome?

She needs to stick around as long as possible to command her ship to the iceberg.
Example Output: Agree

Example Input: Comment: Like him or loathe him Donald Trump built business empires which employed thousands before he became president.  Trudeau drove expensive cars while working as a part time drama teacher, snow board instructor, bouncer, etc before becoming PM. Ya, you're right.  They are a study in contrasts.
Example Output: Disagree

Example Input: Comment: I'd love to have their pension too, but you can put up to $25,000 per year into an RRSP and defer the tax until you need the money.  You probably know that, but I'd like to know why that isn't enough.
Example Output:
Disagree