We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

[EX Q]: Sent1: If a gun used to commit crimes isn't found in the registry, then the registry isn't much of a valuable crime fighting tool is it?
 Sent2: Most violent crime with guns occurs at knife fighting range.
[EX A]: Not similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: The organized militia is equivalent to the well regulated militia of the second amendment.
 Sent2: Yeah, thing is that the second ammendment makes the point that guns should be allowed because a _well organised militia_ is an important tool for a nation.
[EX A]: Not similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: We don't have to choose between total regulation of guns or total denial of the problem of gun crime.
 Sent2: We have more crime than fully armed countries not because we don't have guns.
[EX A]:
Not similar