We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Sent1: The crime rate was higher after the death penalty than before it.
 Sent2: In the time that the death penalty was performed on a regular basis, the crime rate in society was at a lower level.
Similar

Sent1: I don't care if it is in the name of justice or if someone just wants to avenge a death, murder is murder, no matter how it is done.
 Sent2: Someone in my family, honestly I would want that person to take the death penalty.
Not similar

Sent1: If someone is bad enough to be considered for the death penalty then they must have had sure evidence that they are guilty if they are then they shouldn't deserve the right to live among people they could kill
 Sent2: If a person wasn't convicted then they surely wouldn't be murdered by the state.

Not similar