In this task, you're given a statement, and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence clearly disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3' corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.

[EX Q]: Statement: The Office of Program Performance conducted twelve on-site program reviews in 2001. Choices:  1. In 2001, the Office of Program Performance conducted more on-site program reviews than ever before. 2. The Office of Program Performance doesn't perform on-site program reviews. 3. At least twelve on-site program reviews were conducted by the Office of Program Performance in 2001.
[EX A]: 2

[EX Q]: Statement: The objective is to keep the won from falling much more than is necessary for the long-run adjustment of the Korean economy, and thereby to prevent unnecessary bankruptcies and unnecessary depression of Korean income and employment. Choices:  1. Dropping the won as low as possible in value is the goal.  2. Preventing bankruptcies and depression in the Korean economy is the goal of keeping the won from falling.  3. Keeping the won from falling involves influencing banks and financiers through government agencies. 
[EX A]: 1

[EX Q]: Statement: Furthermore, the traditional response to the observation is not in favor of greens, social critics, and other worrywarts who fret over issues such as population growth, but rather supports the capitalist argument that land tends to be used more efficiently under private ownership, in that the owner is interested in supporting the long-term value of the property. Choices:  1. Social critics are worried about population growth as it is expanding too much for the planet to handle. 2. The owner is the least interested in the value of his own property.  3. Traditionally, it is countered that land is more efficiently used under private ownership.
[EX A]:
2