Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.

[EX Q]: So... as I read this story, am I supposed to feel sympathy for a guy who was making $3k per week/$156k per year just because he was laid off and now has to dip into his retirement while receiving unemployment?  Anyone making that kind of salary for as long as he has should easily have at least a couple million in the bank.  You'l have to excuse me now... I must grab a tissue to wipe away my tears.
[EX A]: No

[EX Q]: Anchorage would be a ghost town if not propped up by tax money - state money and especially federal money.  The people who lecture and pontificate about rural Alaska's dependence on public money  are clueless hypocrites.   And racist too!  Most of Alaska's wealth - spiritual, cultural, economic comes out of rural Alaska.  The whole world knows this. Read a book.
[EX A]: Yes

[EX Q]: Like I said, even if she is a tramp, *that* has nothing to do with the crimes.    But when trying to converse with someone who reverts to schoolyard name calling, it's a futile conversation.
[EX A]:
Yes