Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.

[Q]: If they are running unopposed, then why do we waste the ink on having them on a ballot. Surely the Elections Officer can cast a ballot of one to put them back into office.
[A]: No


[Q]: Every driver has an obligation to be LOOKING at least a quarter mile  down the road to see what's going on in front and on the sides of the road.  At least a sober driver can determine when and how quickly to stop or brake.  A DUI driver doesn't have that ability.
[A]: No


[Q]: I echo christa_m's remark below - I am most interested in the answer to #7. With due respect to Mr. Jaquiss, I am perplexed about the placement of this item so far down the list. I also can't fathom these individuals as "protesters" - that describes peaceful marchers objecting to violent deaths at the hands of police officers, not an armed militia. 

These armed domestic terrorists were allowed to overtake control of land protected by our national government for the safety of our wildlife without consequence for 3 weeks; a number of them still remain unfettered in their unlawful, threatening behavior. While in no way do I wish official intervention had led to any loss of life, I most assuredly have far more concern for their being held accountable than I do for the details of their arrest. Is it not obvious why they'd be transferred to Portland? Does it matter if they were drawn away from the refuge under false pretense? I do not understand the tone or intention of this piece.
[A]:
No