In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

[EX Q]: Comment: Actually, gender reassignment is neither cheap nor easy. But what do you care? You have decided that psychological knowledge has not advanced in 50 years, which combined with your easy dismissal of the transgendered shows that you don't actually care about real people with real problems.
[EX A]: Non-obscene

[EX Q]: Comment: Damned skippy.
[EX A]: Obscene

[EX Q]: Comment: I think you have it all wrong. The end result of Rosa Parks's courage -- and of the whole civil rights movement in general -- was not that from now on only black people could sit at the front of the bus, while the whites would be relegated to the back, but that  _anybody_  could sit anywhere they wanted to if a free seat was available. That's true "egalitarian society."  That's what MLK fought for, and that's what's morally right. Sending white people to the back of the bus -- or a concert venue -- is just as racist as it was to try to prevent Rosa Parks from sitting in the front, and white people have just as much right to REFUSE to move if ordered to do so as she did.
[EX A]:
Non-obscene