Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.

Input: Consider Input: So an income tax isn't acceptable, but a 35% tax on the PFD is? Perhaps it looks attractive to you because the PFD to you is a bit of extra money, a nice little bonus to give yourself a treat. You have no clue that there are many households, mostly in the Bush, for whom the PFD is a large part of the yearly income. Cutting that income by 35% is going to mean less , food, fuel, clothing, all the little things that Mr. Olsen takes for granted. 

So once again we have a clueless, tone deaf, Republican more than willing to take from the poor to give to the rich.  It's high time for a change.

Output: Yes


Input: Consider Input: It is fascinating just how many Big-L liberals still wax wroth over the Reagan administration, figuratively thrashing around the floor and chewing sticks.  :-/  Don't they realize that Ronnie's term in office ended nearly 30 years ago, and that the man himself has been dead for a decade??  =:-o  Time to just Let It Go, already!

Output: No


Input: Consider Input: How about 'Arrogant"?  "A law unto himself"?  "A vigilante in uniform"?  "Unable to control his emotions"?  "Egotistic"?  

All of those work for me.


Output: No