We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Example Input: Sent1: So what you're saying is, even if the guy we're sending to the chair didn't actually commit a murder, he should still die because he was an asshole in his personal life.
 Sent2: No he the guy who killed twitter should have to suffer in jail and think about what he done for the rest of his life, and not be given the easy way out buy the death pentaly.
Example Output: Not similar

Example Input: Sent1: I dont think the death penalty should be apllied in just any case.
 Sent2: In any case, while I believe some criminals should just be carried into the street and shot, I don't think the death penalty is worth it in today's society.
Example Output: Not similar

Example Input: Sent1: Firstly there has been no proof that an Innocent man has ever been placed on death row.
 Sent2: the use of the death penalty is an act of revenge which cannot be undone, so should the state be put on trial for putting to death an innocent person?
Example Output:
Not similar