In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: insult and non-insult. Insult is any lanugage or act that is disrespectful or scornfully abusive.

[EX Q]: Comment: Well...just saying that when you use the word "americans", of course you didn't ask each and every one of us.  I think if we used the middle finger on our left hands, THEN they might be irritated.  The islamists and their fellow anti-US bretheren will "attack" us just because we are the U.S.  They use convenient incidents to highlight and reinforce their narrative.  An all too sympathetic left plays along.  So Saladin didn't kill more muslims?  Hmmm.  When Umar nominated Abu Bakir to succeed, and the rest of the followers felt that Ali (Ali Ibn Abi Talib) should have succeeded and become the first caliph....that's a LOT of muslims killing other muslims after that.  Are you sure about your data?  And what about Ghazni?
[EX A]: Non-insult

[EX Q]: Comment: I've read plenty of your posts, and moderate you are not.  Not even close.  Maybe unaffiliated, but not a moderate.
[EX A]: Non-insult

[EX Q]: Comment: I used to be a teacher for a few years and if I were teaching poorly or acting idiotically then I would hope that someone (parent or student) would call me out on it.  Far too many teachers in Ontario, especially in the 1-12 grade range, are idiots who should not be teaching.  Unfortunately they are protected by a very strong labour organization which tries its very best to quash exceptional teaching abilities and techniques (regardless of the rhetoric on their respective websites).  Are there non-idiotic teachers?  There are definitely many but the ratio of idiots-to-others is much larger than it should be.
[EX A]:
Insult