Evaluate the similarity between them and classify them into classes from 0-5 as follows:
0 : The two sentences are completely dissimilar.
1 : The two sentences are not equivalent, but are on the same topic.
2 : The two sentences are not equivalent, but share some details.
3 : The two sentences are roughly equivalent, but some important information differs/missing.
4 : The two sentences are mostly equivalent, but some unimportant details differ.
5 : The two sentences are completely equivalent, as they mean the same thing.

Q: Sentence 1: wen states that the main purpose of the germany visit is to advance trade, economic and technological exchanges. Sentence 2: wen stated that the purpose of his visit to germany is to advance trade, economic and technological exchanges.

A: 5
****
Q: Sentence 1: He told the jury Stubbs is a "cold, calculating killer." Sentence 2: District Attorney Dave Lupas reminded jurors that Stubbs is, "a cold, calculating killer".

A: 3
****
Q: Sentence 1: That objection was cited by PeopleSoft's board in rejecting Oracle's offer. Sentence 2: PeopleSoft's board has recommended stockholders reject the offer.

A:
3
****