Given the Question and Answer pair, detect whether the answer is acceptable or not. Denote acceptable answer as "yes", otherwise denote as "no". An acceptable answer is consistent with the context in question, detailed, long, and uses general knowledge of English. Answers that are not definite and suggest a variety of options are not acceptable answers.

Input: Consider Input: Question: What does "I'm game" mean and what is its correct usage? 
Answer: "I'm game" could mean "I'm very smelly.".

Output: no


Input: Consider Input: Question: For example In Sim Lim Square cheat cases, a person paid $1k for iPhone insurance. He "agreed" to buy it because the price was not clearly written. In some restaurants, prices are not written clearly and people can then be charged exorbitant prices. Insurance costs can vary by up to 100 times because the cost is simply not written clearly. Many politicians use deceptive language. Also, they tend to tell only the benefits without telling the negatives. Say you are a scientist. You have 10 studies supporting your theory and 90 studies showing you are wrong. You only quote the 10 studies to people that can't expect. All of these are deceptions that would make people choose really really "bad deals". Is there a word to describe such deceptions? Lying? Sophism? Fraud? Scam? Pull a fast one? What? 
Answer: vulgar Bullshit or crap or similar expressions "Excuse me, professor, but you're pulling your data out of your ass." "Those price gouges are bullshit." "Charging me extra for sour cream on the loaded nachos is crap." "Everyone knows Donald Trump is full of shit.".

Output: no


Input: Consider Input: Question: What does "I'm game" mean and what is its correct usage? 
Answer: "I'm game" could mean "I'm very smelly.".


Output: no