In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: threat and non-threat. Threat is a statement that someone will be hurt or harmed, especially if the person does not do something in particular.

Comment: People on Meth should just be summarily executed -
Their brain's will never be the same.
Sorry...
Threat

Comment: I find those who chant do so because they either have such a slim argument that they don't want to be drawn into it, or because they lack the mental prowess to mount their argument in a rational manner.  It is for that reason that the "Lock her up," chant is offensive.  

I should point out too that the main perpetrators of the chanting phenomenon are unionists, "Hey, Hey  Ho, Ho.  Fill-in-the-blank has got to go!"   Clever eh?   The "progressives" particularly the enviro-nuts, are no better,  “U.G.L.Y.  Corporate scum you cheat you lie.  You UGLY, uh, uh, you UGLY.”   That intellectual gem and many others are found on the website tarsandsblockade.org

Chanting has no place in rational debate, none.
Non-threat

Comment: I agree that a lot of the refugees will go to places that are economically better off. But that doesn't take away from the fact that countries can refuse to allow in refugees. After all, the US and Canada did prevent Jewish refugees in WW2. Therefore we mustn't self congratulate ourselves for taking refugees - our gesture and sacrifice pales in comparison to the poorer countries that take in millions.

Non-threat