We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Input: Consider Input: Sent1: IMHO, if we have the confidence in our system to throw someone in a cage for the rest of their natural life we should have the same confidence to put someone to death.
 Sent2: By the same token, if we keep administering the death penalty while the system is broken, we will have a much greater risk of putting someone innocent to death.

Output: Not similar


Input: Consider Input: Sent1: Well one thing for sure the muderer or rapist who is executed will never commit those crimes again........He is permanently deterred........
 Sent2: Also, I wonder if a criminal thinks of the punishment when he commits the crime - if he were counting on being punished, he wouldn't have done it.

Output: Not similar


Input: Consider Input: Sent1: It is people like you that let violent criminals walk free, because you evidently feel sorrow for them.
 Sent2: You are against of violence, but have you ever thought that death penalty is also violence?


Output: Not similar