We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

Example Input: It is true that nations such as Switzerland have just as many guns percapita, and Canada probably comes fairly close too, but their gun related deaths are many times lower than that of the US.
Example Output: Valid

Example Input: You keep claiming that you're not of the anti-gun camp, that you actually support the Second Amendment.
Example Output: Valid

Example Input: This doesn't have to be done with a gun, meaning that firearms and ammunition win hands down in terms of longevity.
Example Output:
Valid