Given a document, an entity and its sentiment towards the entity, verify if it is the correct sentiment towards the entity. Answer should be yes or no. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

[Q]: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Bart Fisher is Positive . The top recipient has been Fisher Ranch LLC  the family company of Bart Fisher  a board member and the valleyâs second-largest landowner after Metropolitan. The records show his company has received $27.6 million in annual payments since 2005 for land left fallow.
 Fisher  and other board members say theyâve had no conflicts of interest in these decisions  and their attorney has backed them up. They say the fact that theyâve benefited from the program is the nature of their agencyâs structure as a landowner-voting district. All of the board members are landowners  and theyâre elected by landowners under a voting system in which the largest property owners can cast the largest numbers of votes.
 Fisher  was a leading proponent of the agreement in the early 2000s.  He  said  he  supported it because  he  strongly believed it was in the best long-term interests of landowners and the community.
âThe financial interests of the board were the same as the financial interests of our electorate â  Fisher  said.  He  recalled that Palo Verdeâs attorney advised the board ahead of the vote that they were fine to proceed with the decision.
âThereâs no conflict at PVID at all  because of how we are constituted â  Fisher  said. âOur electorate is whom we serve  and our electorate are landowners.â
Standing beside hay bales on his farm  Palo Verde Irrigation District board member Bart Fisher talks about the agency's lawsuit against the Metropolitan Water District. (Photo: Jay Calderon/The Desert Sun)
When they negotiated the terms of the deal   Fisher  said  the overarching purpose was helping California meet its water needs âwithout diminishing agriculture or our community in the process.â
âI have a vested interest and so do all the landowners in Palo Verde  especially those who participate in the program â  Fisher  said.
Participating farmers received an initial signup bonus of $3 170 per acre. In  Fisher âs case  the records show  his family entities received $6.3 million in initial signup payments.
Having those regular payments can function as a âsafety netâ for farming businesses during hard times and can provide a guarantee to help in getting credit from banks   Fisher  said. That doesnât mean it always pays more than farming  though. Looking back at some years   Fisher  said  farmers would have earned more selling crops than having unplanted fields.
 Fisher  is a third-generation farmer whose family started farming in the Palo Verde Valley in 1917.  He  said the fact that Fisher Ranch has received more from Metropolitan than any other business simply reflects the fact that  his  family has been farming for a century and has gradually expanded its landholdings.
 Fisher  farms more than 11 000 acres  growing hay  wheat  broccoli  cantaloupes and honeydew melons.
 He  said while  his  business receives large sums based on that acreage  it takes a lot of money to run the operation.  Fisher  pointed out that  he  and other growers make huge investments in tractors â which can cost roughly $300 000 each â as well as other equipment. They take out big loans and have large payrolls.
âJust to be in agriculture requires access to vast amounts of capital â  Fisher  said. âNobodyâs getting rich on this program.â
Palo Verde Irrigation District officials â from left  Board Member Jack Seiler   General Manager Ned Hyduke and President Bart Fisher â  talk about why  they  decided to sue Metropolitan Water District. (Photo: Jay Calderon/The Desert Sun)
While considering whether to sue   Fisher  said Palo Verdeâs board members discussed the fact that under the agreement  Metropolitan has the ability to cancel the entire program.
[A]: yes


[Q]: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Pritzker is Neutral . J.B. Pritzker  has a boil on  his  neck the size of Cook County Assessor Joe Berrios.
Actually  it is Joe Berrios  as if Joe just walked out of the Erie Cafe after a nice veal chop. Now  he âs sitting on  his  patch of  Pritzker  for all voters to see.
Joe might as well just light a cigar and wave to the cameras filming those anti-Pritzker political ads.
But  Pritzker  the billionaire running for governor in the March 20 Democratic primary   doesnât want to touch this.  He  wonât go near it.
Berrios  who is also the Cook County Democratic Party chairman (by grace of Boss Madigan)  backs  Pritzker . And so  Pritzker  isnât engaging the thing that stares property tax-paying homeowners right in the face.
Kennedy has long made the property tax system  and the corruption in it  a feature of his campaign. He has called on Berrios to resign.  Pritzker  and  his  ally Mayor Rahm Emanuel would rather change the subject and talk about the guy in the White House.
 âPritzker  talks about things that arenât really the issue.  He  talks about Donald Trump  but  he  skirts the issue of using Joe Berriosâ office to call political supporters.  Pritzkerâs  locked in with those guys.â
Most recently  reporter Jason Grotto âs  excellent series âThe Tax Divideâ â published in June in the Chicago Tribune and continued this month in collaboration with ProPublica â has laid bare much that is wrong with the property tax assessment system in Cook County:
As Kennedy  along with Republican Gov. Bruce Rauner and his GOP primary opponent  state Rep. Jeanne Ives  demand Berriosâ head on a pike  pressure increases on Joeâs friends  like  Pritzker .
 Pritzker  has money.  He âs built a statewide political organization. If  he  can satisfy the media by issuing proclamations against Trump  why should he fight on Kennedyâs ground?
Galia Slayen  the communications director for the Pritzker campaign  notes that  Pritzker  has publicly called out the property tax system. And  she says  the criticisms of her candidate are unfounded.
Fair enough. But  Pritzker  isnât running against Rauner now.  He âs not running against Donald Trump either.
 He âs running for the Democratic nomination against Chris Kennedy  and property taxes will be the issue. And they will be the issue in the general election.
Yet  he  avoids any mention of Berrios  who maintains the system  or Madigan  who benefits  and who can snap  his  fingers and have Joe come running.
 Pritzker  has a serious weakness in all this beyond the Berrios on  his  neck.  His  ham-handed decision to seek a property tax reduction for  his  Gold Coast neighborhood mansion will revisit  him .
 He  bought the house next door and had the toilets removed so it would be declared an uninhabitable dwelling. Then  he  got a tax break of nearly $230 000 for living next to it.
[A]: yes


[Q]: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Roy Gross is Neutral . âHis tail was whipping around  I had his head and his body twisting  it took everything I had to hold him without him getting away from me â the Chief of Department for the Suffolk County SPCA Chief Roy Gross told The Post.
But  Gross  said having an illegal reptile like an alligator in a residential home is no joke.
The gator was discovered on Friday after Suffolk Police were called to the home for an unrelated matter. They found the reptile  believed to be about 4-years-old  in a shed filled with complete with heat lamps  water and plenty of food.  Gross  said it was being kept as a pet.
Keeping a wild animal like an alligator in a home in New York is illegal  unless the residence is a licensed habitat  aquarium or zoo   Gross  said. The owner was charged with illegal possession of a wild animal by the New York Department of Environmental Conservation and faces a fine up to $250. If the Suffolk SPCA discovers the animal was abused or neglected  which Gross said is unlikely  the owner could face jail time.
[A]:
no