Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.

Example Input: your an Idiot!
Example Output: Yes

Example Input: I don't like the label "hawk" since it is used with a negative connotation.  I believe that Rep. Gabbard is a realist.  She understands that our regime change wars have been a total disaster but is also willing to admit the truth about the things that are true threats.  She "gets" ISIS, As-Qaeda, and other "Islamists" or "Jihadists" (both distinct from ordinary Muslims) and the danger they present not only to the West, but also to their fellow Muslims in the Middle East and Africa.  How many people have to be killed by ISIS, Boko Haram, Hamas, Hezbollah, Al-Qaeda, Al-Nusra, and others before the Western left accepts reality?  Tulsi gets it and for that I am grateful.
Example Output: No

Example Input: "Imams got the message in India and radical Muslim violence was prevented." 

 Unfortunately, the Imams (and possibly the Pakistani Intelligence Service) didn't get the message in Pakistan and decided to attack India anyway in November 2008.  Result, 160 dead in Mumbai.

And Pakistan, a member of the United Nations,  released the alleged mastermind just last year.  

http://www.cnn.com/2015/03/13/asia/pakistan-mumbai-attacks/index.html
Example Output:
No