We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Q: Sent1: The question of whether death sentence should be allowed to continue or not, is therefore dependent upon the society and in general a society that has evolved as a "civilized" society would not need such punishments.
 Sent2: America, has no doubt evolved as a civilized society, but it has terrible enemies who would work from within its society and this may be a reason for wanting to continue death penalty.

A: Not similar
****
Q: Sent1: if someone commits any crime, then they are a criminal by definition and should die.
 Sent2: So, when someone gets the death penalty, they chose their own fate by committing the crime.

A: Not similar
****
Q: Sent1: Texas, with many executions, followed the same trend as states without any executions.
 Sent2: Comparable countries without the death penalty have fewer murders then Texas.

A:
Similar
****