Given a passage with a context and an answer, construct a question on the basis of the information present in the passage. Construct the question in such a way that (i) it is unambiguous, (ii) it is answerable from the passage, (iii) its answer is unique (iv) it answer uses text phrases from the passage. Avoid creating questions that (i) can't be answered correctly without actually understanding the passage and (ii) uses the same words or phrases given in the passage.

Context: Eph receptors, comprising the A- and B-subfamilies, are the largest family of receptor tyrosine kinases in the mammalian genome, and their function is critical for morphogenesis in a variety of contexts. Whereas signaling through B-type Ephs has been demonstrated to play a role in cleft lip and palate (CL/P), the involvement of A-type Ephs has not been examined in this context notwithstanding a recent genome-wide association study that identified the EPHA3 locus as a candidate for non-syndromic CL/P.', 'Here, we present a systematic analysis of the gene expression patterns for the nine EphA receptors at progressive stages of mouse development and find that EphA3, EphA4, and EphA7 exhibit restricted overlapping patterns of expression during palate development. We find that homozygous mutation of EphA3 or compound homozygous mutation of EphA3 and EphA4 in mice does not result in defective midfacial development, supporting the possibility of redundant function with EphA7. We also document previously undescribed expression patterns in other tissues of the craniofacial complex including the lacrimal duct and salivary glands.
Answer: Together, these results are consistent with the hypothesis that mutations in EPHA family genes may cause CL/P and also suggest that functional redundancy between family members may be at play.
Does embryonic expression of EphA receptor genes in mice support their candidacy for involvement in cleft lip and palate?

Context: Cells of the myeloid lineage comprise a very heterogeneous population with many phenotypes and functional activities including macrophages and dendritic cells. To investigate the status, differentiative potential and lineage commitment of monocytic cells in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients, this study isolated and cultured peripheral blood monocytes from patients and healthy donors.', 'Monocytes were isolated by gradient centrifugation and adherence to plastic dishes. The cells were then cultured for three days, partially supplemented with GM-CSF and interleukin 4 (IL4) to obtain dendritic cells. The differentiation status was monitored by the expression of surface markers using flow cytometry and cytokine secretion.', 'Monocytes from SLE patients expressed significantly lower numbers of the monocytic marker CD14 and HLA-DR while secreting significantly more tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNFalpha) than monocytes from healthy donors. The addition of GM-CSF and IL4 resulted in an inhibition of TNFalpha secretion, but was not sufficient to generate monocytederived dendritic cells.
Answer: Monocytes from SLE patients are severely altered in phenotype and function and have a limited differentiation flexibility towards the accessory type of monocytic cells.
Are monocytes from systemic lupus erythematous patients severely altered in phenotype and lineage flexibility?

Context: Although epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) have become key therapeutic agents for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with EGFR mutation, little is known about the efficacy of EGFR-TKIs according to different treatment timings.', 'A total of 1,250 patients with NSCLC were screened for EGFR mutations at a single institution between March 2006 and May 2010. The efficacy of EGFR-TKIs in terms of response rate (RR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were compared according to the treatment timing.', 'Among the 437 patients (36.1 %) with EGFR mutation, we analyzed 222 patients who received EGFR-TKI treatment. With a median follow-up duration of 27.5 months (range 8.3-69.2), EGFR-TKI was given to 97 (43.7 %), 109 (49.1 %), and 16 (7.2 %) patients as first-line, second-line, and third-line therapy, respectively. All three groups showed similar RR (71.1, 72.5, and 75.0 %, respectively) to EGFR-TKI (p = 0.802). No significant difference was observed according to treatment timing of EGFR-TKI in terms of PFS (median 10.6, 13.0, and 10.4 months; p = 0.670) and OS (median 20.5, 26.2, and 17.1 months; p = 0.142). The treatment timing of EGFR-TKI still showed no association with PFS or OS after adjusting significant prognostic factors including performance, disease status, and EGFR mutation types.
Answer: EGFR-TKIs showed similar efficacy in patients with EGFR mutation-positive adenocarcinoma in terms of RR, PFS, and OS irrespective of treatment timing. Although EGFR-TKIs are currently the treatment of choice of first-line treatment in patients with EGFR-positive tumors, the sequential treatment with EGFR-TKI could be a reasonable option when EGFR mutation status cannot be obtained in a short time.

Is eGFR-TKI effective regardless of treatment timing in pulmonary adenocarcinoma with EGFR mutation?