We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Example Input: The non-repeat offenders are typically people who committed much smaller crimes that would never be worthy of the death penalty in the first place.
Example Output: Valid

Example Input: You can't limit appeals because people have been redeemed in their 3rd and 4th appeals.
Example Output: Valid

Example Input: They should be in solitary confinement for 23 hours a day with access only to the religious book of their choice if they want one.
Example Output:
Valid