TASK DEFINITION: In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence can be inferred from the statement. Incorrect choices change the meaning in important ways or have details that are not mentioned in the statement. Indicate your answer as 1,2, or 3 corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.
PROBLEM: Statement: And it is impossible to see how this difference from Rust has any bearing upon the First Amendment question, which, to repeat, is whether the funding scheme is 'manipulated' to have a 'coercive effect' on those who do not hold the subsidized position. Choices:  1. It is not possible to see how this difference from Rust has any bearing on the First Amendment question. 2. The difference from Rust on the First Amendment question is very noticeable. 3. The question that was asked it really rather very subjective.

SOLUTION: 1

PROBLEM: Statement: term as used here is not meant to include frequency of delivery. Choices:  1. Frequency of delivery is the amount of times the deliver occurs or is scheduled to occur. 2. This term does not refer to the rate at which the delivery is made. 3. The term as used here is meant to include the frequency of delivery.

SOLUTION: 2

PROBLEM: Statement: Drew Kirby had a mule and two good horses, maybe three by tomorrow. Choices:  1. Drew Kirby kept his animals in order to do some work. 2. Drew Kirby had sold all his animals. 3. Drew Kirby had some animals.

SOLUTION:
3