In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

Input: Consider Input: Comment: No it is not ok to accept gays watever into the church with the hope of reforming them.  There is no way of changing a gay person into a straight person.  Like changing a black into a white.  Might be possible of changing a white into a black  (Black like me) but I have never heard of the opposite.  

Now why would anyone disapprove and criticize a life style?

Output: Identity-attack


Input: Consider Input: Comment: _"like all Republicans: show me the money"_ -- GoDucks!

I have to love this. Some anonymous person, posting as "GoDucks!" is trying to knock a candidate for raising money.
 
Ummm. It's Nike's money that has turned UO from an educational institution into a semi-pro athletic money machine and party school.

Go Ducks indeed!

-- Paul

Output: Non-identity-attack


Input: Consider Input: Comment: Gay people are to hate themselves, to live lonely, unloving lives without opportunity for intimate relationships. Not to tell them his is, according to Jay Edward and Cardinal Sarah, to "demean" them. Jay and Sarah's god is neither loving nor caring.


Output: Identity-attack