TASK DEFINITION: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gay Marriage) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gay marriage. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gay marriage.
PROBLEM: There are no actual legal stipulations regarding HIV patients having sex, particularily with non-HIV people, which may as well be considered murder.

SOLUTION: Invalid

PROBLEM: An even thornier question is whether Bingham and his fellow Republicans aimed through the 14th amendment privileges or immunities clause to protect rights not enumerated in the Bill of Rights.

SOLUTION: Invalid

PROBLEM: For starters, prove to me that gay sex is natural with something more substantial than "it exists in nature", and explain in detail that if in fact it is natural, why is it natural.

SOLUTION:
Valid