TASK DEFINITION: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
PROBLEM: Regarding your Fred Stewart story, you need to ask yourself how certain you are before you print a story that absolutely destroys the candidacy of someone who has served his community well.   Do you really know Fred's relationship with his ex-wife -- no you don't.   Do you know if she is telling the truth when you quote her -- no you don't.   Does this one incident of disagreement and physical confrontation with his daughter disqualify Fred?   Is there more to the story -- a young woman stuck between a feuding Mother and Father and choosing her Mother -- in a not so surprising situation?  Is the Grant High School student's story reflective of the whole context and therefore should be used.   As someone who has edited hundreds of WW stories, I would say that this is tabloid journalism at its worst.   
If I were Terry Bean, Jordan Schnitzer, Jefferson Smith, Eileen Brady, or Fred Stewart, I would be thinking about the private lives and motivations of Mark Zusman and Nigel Jaquiss.

SOLUTION: No

PROBLEM: You're going to try and make the argument 'if' you were Jewish???.
Look up the definition ,if you don't know it.
Your comment was anti-Semitic anyway you want to twist it, whether you're Jewish or not.
And you're not, hypothetical's don't give it validity,so don't play that angle.

You just answered your own question, that disregards the rest of your diatribe.
You said ' it's shameful practicing eugenics 'regardless of his being Jewish'.
There you go.
 The issue of whether eugenics is bad or not is another issue. 
But what difference does it make if he's Jewish or not?
Why mention it???
The issue of religious belief towards eugenics didn't come up in the article.
Religion wasn't a concern to Schnitzer. 
That is what makes it anti-Semitic, any way you try and twist it around.
That he is Jewish had nothing to do with the topic/issue.
You threw it in there. You're an anti-semite (and you're not Jewish, that analogy is irrelevant. There you go. You just put your foot in your mouth.

SOLUTION: Yes

PROBLEM: Come on Frank . Is it in your DNA to be uncivil ?   You ask a fair question until you have to resort to schoolyard name calling.   As to your question , I had families to raise . I sucked it up , working in dangerous conditions , in all kinds of weather , to support my family.    I'm not saying a person has to remain silent , but over the years I saw many people take jobs they KNEW weren't their dream job , only to complain every day about it.

SOLUTION:
Yes