instruction:
In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.
question:
Comment: No one knows how to gauge te outcome based on the ranked ballot.  But isn't the challenge greater than that?   
Each EDA counts as 100 points and the first candidate to get 16901 points, or more, is the winner.  This means that EDA's with a small number of members carry a lot of weight.  If one candidate has 28% support concentrated in many EDA's with few members, that candidate ha a much better chance than another candidate with 35% support concentrated in a few ridings in the GTA.
This is the same approach the Liberals used to choose Justin Trudeau.  Apparently, he had broad support getting over 80% of the points on the first round.  This time around, it seems like a real crap shoot.
answer:
Obscene


question:
Comment: No other arrests were made?  You gotta be kidding me!  And I just don't get the philosophy of the police leaving what is obviously a hostile scene to "diffuse" it.  I'm thinking harassing a police officer when they are doing their duty to "serve and protect"  is a crime.  Arrest them all and let them deal with the criminal justice system.. That's gonna cost them money, and we all are lucky some jail time.  This outcome just emboldens the rats...
answer:
Non-obscene


question:
Comment: What a piece of shit.killing a animal
answer:

Obscene