The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the self-need strategy, otherwise output No. self-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to create a personal need for an item in the negotiation, such as by pointing out that the participant sweats a lot to show preference towards water packages.

[EX Q]: Context: 'TO THE FOOD DEAL IN THE HIGH PIRORITY COMPLEX COMPOUND AND THE WATER IN THE MEDIUM COMPOUND AND THE FIREWOOD IS THE LOW COMPOUND'
Utterance: 'I want all the firewood and all the water please. 🙂'
[EX A]: No

[EX Q]: Context: 'hello' 'Hey! How are you? My bestie and I were going to be going on a camping trip, but my other friends heard about it and wanted to come along so we're going to need more supplies than I initially though which has got me a little worried. ☹️' 'Yes!!! I need some water pretty bad.  I am good on food because I fish and I have been able to catch some catfish from the lake.  How about I take 2 water 2 firewood and 1 food'
Utterance: 'I need a lot of food, because of how many people are coming now (like 3 times as many). Also, there's only one stream in the area and it's really far from our campsite, so it would be super inconvenient to have to hike there everyday to refill our canteens. We are in a forest though, so we should be good for wood. Since you can easily fish, what if I take 3 food and 2 water? You can keep all the firewood. 🙂'
[EX A]: Yes

[EX Q]: Context: 'And I would get all the water?' 'How about you get two firewoods and two water, and I take the rest?' 'No I think I need all the water. I'm in the desert and there's absolutely no water supply. '
Utterance: 'so you want two firewoods and three waters and I get everything else? '
[EX A]:
No