We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Input: Consider Input: Sent1: If the death penalty deters murder (as you claim) then why does Europe have a lower murder rate even though they've outlawed the death penalty?
 Sent2: The death penalty as a deterrent, our murder rate loudly speaks to that.

Output: Similar


Input: Consider Input: Sent1: The fact remains that life in prison is cheaper than sentencing one to the death penalty.
 Sent2: Without the trials and appeals, death penalty cases would be much cheaper than confining inmates for the rest of their lives.

Output: Not similar


Input: Consider Input: Sent1: I have evidence that says that innocent people are convicted of crimes.
 Sent2: As I mentioned, I feel that two witnesses to the crime(s) or a confession in court is sufficient.


Output: Not similar