Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.

CIVIL - The guy fired in an area where gunshots are not common. He did not tell owner anything of his reasoning. He drove off and did not tell police why he fired a gun in a residential area. He was called in by witness as he fled. He is guilty.
Yes

"Leave your entitled attitude behind when you leave anchorage. Drivers out here are not accustomed to this and are not expecting it."

"We are constantly ran off sidewalks by riders speeding by. The entitled attitudes are not endearing."

Seems that everyone believes that bicyclists are behaving "entitled".  I side with the sidewalk pedestrians.  Bikes are vehicles that belong on the roads.  The car drivers should leave their entitled attitudes at home.  Better yet, they should get their fat butts on a bicycle since most of them need the exercise.
Yes

The military system, unlike the academic side of the U of O, more closely approaches a meritocracy.  There are conditions, tasks and standards which must be met to succeed.  The sports side also has that sort of system.  One is required to meet or exceed standards or you lose your position, whether as a player or as a coach.  The academic standards are subject to less rigor and certainty, based on my experience as a student.  They more closely match with the rest of societies' concept of 'sucking up'.  To get a good 'grade' one is required to parrot the information nearest and dearest to the heart of the instructors involved.  I am given to understand that there is also a thing known as 'grade inflation' which is a corollary of the Lake Woebegone Principle that 'everyone is above average'.  Those who successfully parrot the appropriate information are all then found to be in the highest percentile.  These tendencies are most prevalent in the squishy 'sciences', of course.

Yes