TASK DEFINITION: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.
PROBLEM: Comment: Thanks for the historical perspective. Always worth while.
Whom the gods would destroy they first drive mad. We already have the  mad part of Trump covered.

SOLUTION: Non-obscene

PROBLEM: Comment: Do you see the paradox?  Gun people always scream about mental health...whenever tragedy occurs, we hear how it has absolutely nothing to do with the availability of guns and everything to do with mental health.  Then when people try to get at those mental health concerns before a tragedy - that gets decried as well.  Damned if you do, damned if you don't I guess.

SOLUTION: Obscene

PROBLEM: Comment: The U of U is such a shit hole. You can't even identify as liberal if you aren't a PC crusader anymore, they won't let you. The gender studies, psychology and student affairs departments are so aggressively pursuing this ideology there isn't space to contest it even from a classically liberal standpoint. Free speech is just not really a value. The president may say it is but in practice professors are telling minorities to report anything they don't like it and micro aggressions are defined by the person taking offense...so you're fucked, you can't say anything.

SOLUTION:
Obscene