The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.

Context: 'Hello! Thats terrible that the airline lost your bags! I'm planning on have a large group of friends with me so we need lots of snacks with us. We are scared of fires so we don't want to make campfires.' 'Well maybe we can work something out between us.  Our food and water was in the bags they loss so I really need those.  Do you think you could make do with 1 food and some water?' 'I really need 2 foods. I can do with 1 water or if you are in a giving mood then maybe I can have 2 waters? 🙂'
Utterance: 'Looks like we both really need the food.  If you get 2 food I would need 1 food, 2 water and 3 firewood. '
No

Context: 'Well, let me think on that.  Why do you need so much water for a starter?' 'I get dehydrated easily. I need to water so that doesn't happen. 🙂' 'Hmm.  And why do you need so much food?'
Utterance: 'I need an extra supply of food, as I exercise a lot! 🙂'
No

Context: 'Hello, great to see a fellow camper.  Planing on doing any hikes.  My family and mother-in-law are down getting some new trail maps.  We are looking forward to the long camping weekend.  Our bad luck was the airline loss two of our bags that had our food and water.  So i am hoping to get some more.🙂'
Utterance: 'Hello! Thats terrible that the airline lost your bags! I'm planning on have a large group of friends with me so we need lots of snacks with us. We are scared of fires so we don't want to make campfires.'

Yes