In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: toxic and non-toxic. Toxicity is defiend as anything that is rude, disrespectful, or unreasonable that would make someone want to leave a converation.
--------
Question: Comment: SMLR

Answer: Non-toxic


Question: Comment: This is hilarious more fake news! This moron was never a republican.... What a disgusting human being...

Answer: Toxic


Question: Comment: Although Divisions are legal subsidiaries of the GC, without their own Constituencies, their respective Executive Committees consist largely of persons designated by their member Union Conferences.  Cast in English legal tradition, this means allegations of Apostasy or Rebellion within Union Conferences, are first evaluated by a "Jury of their Peers" which seems fair to Yours Truly.

But in this case the desired outcome (from Ted Wilson's perspective) is unlikely to emerge from the presently defined process.  That is why Wilson is maneuvering to change the process so he can effect an "end-run" around the Divisions that in his mind, are aiding and abetting the present "Rebellion".

And that is why many GC Executive Committee members both inside and outside Silver Spring MD (at least 40% and perhaps more), are rightly concerned about Wilson's naked grab for "Kingly Power" over other church entities.

Answer:
Non-toxic