In this task, you are given books product reviews in English language. The goal is to classify the review as "POS" if the overall sentiment of the review is positive or as "NEG" if the overall sentiment of the review is negative.

Input: Consider Input: Complete and Utter Fluff . There's no spark whatsoever in Spark. If you're interested in the subject of co-creation read Eric von Hippel's Democratizing Innovation instead.

Output: NEG


Input: Consider Input: A work for academic readers only . This book reads like a PhD dissertation and focuses on making reference after reference to dozens of other academic articles and books, much like a college research paper. I wonder if these 5 star reviews are from sociology professors because this is very dry reading and I can't imagine a casual reader being interested in reading this book at all

Output: NEG


Input: Consider Input: Accidental Fabrication . I haven't read Mr. Crawford/s book but I have read all 126 reviews.  Based on the reviews, not one soldier that served in Iraq gave the book a positive review.  That says those that know what serving in Iraq is like find the author something of a fraud.    It was pointed out that Mr. Crawford previously served in the regular active-duty army and therefore he should know what service in the National Guard is all about, including being recalled to active duty in a time of war.  You cannot over look this point.  Therefore, the rest of Mr. Crawford/s claims must be suspect if he misrepresents being an accidental soldier.    Drugs.  You don't do drugs in a combat zone.  I served in Vietnam and know that drugs and war do not mix very well.    I suspect that the people who praise this book have an anti-Iraq war bias.


Output: NEG