TASK DEFINITION: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.
PROBLEM: Comment: Well done to the DA, risking a coalition to ensure better governance for the people. That takes balls.

SOLUTION: Sexual-explicit

PROBLEM: Comment: I understand that she is equally proficient doing the alternate oral-anal thing...

SOLUTION: Sexual-explicit

PROBLEM: Comment: Hello editors,

You call that a news headline?

Are you kidding me?

"Canadians’ attitudes toward immigration hardening, government poll shows"

Look, that is a FINE headline for an editorial column where opinions are given.

But for a news headline, no, the phrase "attitudes hardening" is an OPINION, it is not an objective, dispassionate observation.

Sure, ONE person might say that folks who want to double our immigration rates are soft, caring people and that folks who want to reduce our immigration rates are cold, hard people.

But, um, hello? THAT person's view is FULL of partisan ideology.

Because another person out there can equally well say: Folks who want to reduce our immigration rates are soft, caring folks who want to nurture Canadian culture in a manner that is a gradual evolution rather than a rapid replacement, and folks who want to double our immigration rates are hard, heartless people who carelessly place cold economic benefit above all other considerations...

SOLUTION:
Non-sexual-explicit