In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine the neutral choice based on your inference from the statement and your commonsense knowledge. The neutral choice is a sentence that neither agrees nor disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3', corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence. If sentence X agrees with sentence Y, one's correctness follows from the other one. If sentence X disagrees with sentence Y, they can not be correct at the same time.
--------
Question: Statement: Consider Ehrlichman's reference to a certain left-wing Harvard professor, [first name unknown] Pomerantz, or whatever his name is, whose generosity towards the George McGovern campaign raises Nixon's suspicions. Choices: 1. Pomerantz's generosity raised Nixon's respect for him. 2. Pomerantz's generosity raised Nixon's doubts because of past experiences. 3. Pomerantz's generosity raised Nixon's doubts.

Answer: 2


Question: Statement: oh you should have used it you wouldn't have been liable for the payment Choices: 1. If you used your credit card you wouldn't be liable for the payment. 2. You wouldn't have been liable for the payment if you used it. 3. The big red fox jumped over the blue and green fence.

Answer: 1


Question: Statement: Curbline routes, however, account for only 21 percent of city residential possible deliveries. Choices: 1. Curb line routes are the most popular possible delivery points in our city. 2. Curb line routes are becoming less popular because of the internet.  3. Curb-line routes only account for 21 percent of our cities possible delivery points.

Answer:
2