Categorize the comment on the basis of obscenity. If the comment is obscene output Yes, otherwise output No.

[EX Q]: Mr .Gerson has said a lot of words bemoaning the fact that Trump isn't a conservative and telling us what a conservative isn't.  

What he has failed to define is what those 'conservative ideals' are that are apparently being ignored by those who hold them and why voters should support them.  

"Conservative" is like "Socialist"; meanings vary from person to person.  

Social conservatism is different than fiscal conservatism, for example.  Which brand of 'conservatism' did Gerson espouse when he worked for George W?   Why did the voters throw Brother Jeb Bush under the bus?  

Is this just nostalgia for a Federal job for Gerson?
[EX A]: No

[EX Q]: Yet you're still free to be bat-shut crazy and make a total ass of yourself on a daily basis. What a country! Go Rhyner go, a legend in his own mind.
[EX A]: Yes

[EX Q]: You're right. I hadn't considered how the right to private property and protection against unreasonable search and seizure is BS. Thanks for enlightening me. 

Sarcasm aside; with a "put these idiots afoot as bear bait" and "I would do that in a heartbeat" attitude, thank you for leaving the police service. The force is better for it. The state should work to improve the situations that encourage reckless driving on the highway, but allowing police officers that much latitude doesn't respect the Constitutional right to the due process of law. You don't get to play judge and jury.
[EX A]:
Yes