In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: threat and non-threat. Threat is a statement that someone will be hurt or harmed, especially if the person does not do something in particular.

Example Input: Comment: When you boss tells you are suppose to work and you DO NOT , HE CAN FIRE YOU !!When the owner expects you to stand and you DON'T he can FIRE YOU !
Example Output: Threat

Example Input: Comment: Yes, the IM law requires the Department to establish moose population objectives and the BOG approves.  In most cases, unrealistically high population objectives have been set that are unsustainable.  This is what one can expect from a BOG that is entirely hunters and hunting guides and a Department that is addicted to hunting license revenues.  The result is predictable: endless killing of bears and wolves while moose objectives are seldom reached.  And this is at a cost of over $ 1 million per year, and at a greater cost to keeping Alaska's wild ecosystems healthy.  We are allowing ourselves to be bamboozled by an inherently corrupt system that favors about 14% of the Alaskans that hunt, and its not even working for them.  Its time to "repeal, and replace" the IM law with a wildlife conservation policy that is scientifically based, preserves ecosystem health, and respects democratic principles.
Example Output: Non-threat

Example Input: Comment: Insinuating that Trump is the devil is a perfect example of how people misuse language to inflame, to cause injury, to divide, to stir angst (and frankly to draw attention to themselves).

Incendiary language should be examined, and tempered, and made more refined. 

As Francis has taught violence begins in the mind - it's not limited to physical expressions.   And the expressions I see here have all the signs of violence. 

And physical actions begin in the mind.    So be careful.
Example Output:
Non-threat