Given a document, an entity and its sentiment towards the entity, verify if it is the correct sentiment towards the entity. Answer should be yes or no. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

Ex Input:
Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Luke Cage is Negative . Netflix just published the new âDefendersâ series  the culmination of several years of work by Marvel Television to get Marvel into prestige serial storytelling. (We have to find a new word for this: we canât call it âTVâ much longer.) The Marvel-Netflix deal now includes two seasons of âDaredevil â and one each of âJessica Jones â âLuke Cage â and âIron Fist.â Thatâs 65 episodes  plus the new eight-episode âDefenders â around 50 minutes each. Thatâs more than 60 hours on screen in the last two years.
Now  you can blame whatâs wrong with âThe Defendersâ on the Marvel shtick: America has no enemies but its own divisions. The heroes inevitably fight each other. That could work if you had writers who understood Americaâs divisions  but itâs disastrous when all youâve got is pettiness and liberal identity politics. âThe Defendersâ does better than any Marvel movie to give you thrilling fights  however. At least Daredevil does;  Luke Cage  is also pretty good; the other two were deficient to begin with and apparently not getting better.
There is a deep argument hidden somewhere in this mess of a story. But to see it develop  the viewer has to ask himself: why is Daredevil so scared of his own heroism  which might lead him to kill people? Heâs a Catholic  of course. And weâre reminded of that in an important scene in a confessional. But whatâs the import of that fact? Why is  Luke Cage  telling a grieving mother  he  learned about the power of prayer from  his  own father?  He âs an heir to MLKâs sacrifice and hope  as we know from  his  own show  but why does that matter here? The evil guys  too: why is their quest for immortality so evil or wrong? We all want to live as long as possible  anyway!
Instead  we get this mess of American social pathologies of individualism and evil ninjas. This is worthless for articulating the fight between two worlds  one dedicated to equality  the other inequality. Maybe future stories will get better. A friend pointed out that thereâs a lot of Christianity in the first season of âLuke Cage â and the second season is supposed to be more serious about civil rights. He also pointed out another sign of hope: civil rights are connected with the Second Amendment.
In my previous essay  I said high-flying civil rights rhetoric collapses in âLuke Cage.â Behold: in an emotional moment mid-season  Luke Cage tells a young black man-turned-criminal about Crispus Attucksâthe first man killed in the Boston Massacre of 1770  and thus  the first martyr of the American Revolution. He was black. We see his legacy exploited by a gangster and a politician  who abuse Harlem while pretending to save it. Unlike Attucks  they always put themselves first  because when they were poor  weak  and needed protection  nobody put them first.
 Luke Cage  takes a shot to the head from that stupid  scared young criminalâbut it makes no dramatic sense  with a literally bulletproof hero.  Luke Cage  is no Crispus Attucks. Our stories fake sacrifice  and thus betray our deepest awareness of our neediness. Thatâs because of our politics and our fear of death.

Ex Output:
no


Ex Input:
Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Stanley Fischer is Positive . Federal Reserve Vice Chair Stanley Fischer  announced last week  he  was resigning for personal reasons before the end of  his  term  opening yet another seat in the central bank's powerful board for President Donald Trump to fill.
The departure of  Fischer   73  represents a big loss of institutional knowledge and gravitas for the Fed at a time when many American institutions are sorely lacking in technocratic expertise.  Fischer  is considered the leader of a generation of prominent academic and professional economics  in part because  he  taught many of them at MIT.
" He  is often referred to as the dean of central bankers  having taught most central bankers including former Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke and European Central Bank president Mario Draghi " Shawn Baldwin  the chairman of AIA Group  wrote in a LinkedIn post. " Fischer 's departure creates a vacuum not easily filled  adding to the uncertainty in monetary policy."
Larry Summers  the Harvard economist and former Treasury secretary  dubbed  Fischer 's resignation "the end of an era."
Fischer  who was born in Zambia and later studied in London  started his career as an academic but became a policymaker at the World Bank and later the International Monetary Fund  where he rose to the role of first deputy managing director.  Fischer  then spent three years at Citigroup as a vice chairman before moving to Israel in 2005 to become the head of its central bank.  Fischer  returned to the US as Fed vice chairman in 2014.  His  term was not set to end until June 2018.
"The Fed and the international monetary system will be weaker for  his  departure from official responsibility " Summers wrote in a blog post.
" Stan 's has been a singular career "  he  said. "As an MIT professor he coauthored  with  his  close friend Rudi Dornbusch  the macro textbook that defined the basics of the field for a generation. With Olivier Blanchard " the former IMF chief economist  "he wrote the treatise that defined the state of the art for graduate students. His lectures were models of lucid exposition and balanced judgment. My view of monetary economics was shaped by my experience auditing his class in the Fall of 1978."
Not everyone is complimentary about the arc of  Fischer 's career. To some  he represents the kind of establishment economics that led to financial instability and income inequality in many parts of the world.
During his time at the IMF   Fischer  became the face of austerity measures gone wrong. Many of his and the IMF's recommendations for drastic spending cuts during the Asian financial crisis of the late 1990s have since been widely discredited as having made matters worse.
"I see  Fischer  as to a large extent the embodiment of the conventional wisdom among macroeconomists and central bankers " said Dean Baker  the director of the Center for Economic and Policy Research  a liberal Washington think tank. " He  also  in the pre-crisis days  was very much associated with the deregulation of finance gang  although I think  he  has developed an appreciation of the need for regulation since the crisis."
Indeed   Fischer  has spoken out rather strongly against efforts by Trump and Republicans to unwind most of the key regulations imposed on Wall Street after the crisis with the aim of preventing a repeat performance.
"We seem to have forgotten that we had a financial crisis  which was caused by behavior in the banking and other parts of the financial system  and it did enormous damage to this economy "  Fischer  told CNBC in April  just as the president was signing an executive order aimed at what  he  said was "reviewing" Dodd-Frank.
"Millions of people lost their jobs  millions of people lost their houses "  Fischer  said. "This was not a small-time  regular recession. This was huge  and it affected the rest of the world  and it affected  to some extent  our standing in the world as well. We should not forget that."
Baker says  Fischer  did a good job in Israel  where  he  managed the central bank from 2005 to 2013.
" He  pushed down the value of the shekel  giving the country a large trade surplus  which allowed it to get through the Great Recession with little damage " Baker said.
As for US monetary policy   his  tenure did not include much action on the part of the Fed  but  Fischer  has been erroneously worried about the threat of looming inflation since the start of  his  tenure.

Ex Output:
yes


Ex Input:
Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Drake Has Topped is Neutral . Hip-hop superstar Drake  has kicked off 2018 in the best way possible  and  he âs made a bit of charting history in the process.
 He  recently dropped a short EP called Scary Hours  and this week  both tracks on the collection  âGodâs Planâ and âDiplomatic Immunity â have debuted inside the top 10 on the Hot 100. âGodâs Planâ has started at No. 1 (making it one of fewer than 30 songs in history to do so)  while âDiplomatic Immunityâ opens at No. 7  giving him his twenty-first and twenty-second top 10 hits in this country.
 Drake  has now become the first musician in U.S. history to debut two songs inside the Hot 100âs top 10 not once  but twice.  He  first did so last year when  he  unleashed  his  playlist project More Life  which itself debuted at No. 1 on the Billboard 200. The first week they were eligible to chart   Drake  debuted two songs from the collection  âPassionfruitâ and âPortlandâ (which features Quavo and Travis Scott) at Nos. 8 and 9  respectively. The Canadian superstar was just the second artist to achieve such an impressive feat of charting dominance  and surprisingly  the only other act to do so beat  him  by just a few months.
Ed Sheeran became the first to launch more than one new title inside the top 10 on the Hot 100 in very early January 2017  when his tracks âShape of Youâ and âCastle on the Hillâ were both instant success stories upon arrival. âShapeâ quickly became Sheeranâs first leader in the U.S.  while âCastleâ started at No. 6  which would end up being its peak. While  Drake 's first time starting two tunes inside the top 10 didn't involve a No. 1  he has essentially replicated the beginning of Ed Sheeran's 2017  which might be a sign that he's setting up what could be the biggest year of his career.

Ex Output:

no