Categorize the comment on the basis of toxicity. If the comment is toxic (harmful, malicious, derogatory, threat, insult, identity attck, etc.) output Yes, otherwise output No.

Q: Having been on Hagemeister and seeing first hand the devastation, the only word in your diatribe that is accurate is 'stupid'. Another example of this man made ecological disaster is at the south end of Umnak Island where feral cattle and sheep have disturbed an archaeological site that is considered the oldest in the Aleutians. I've been there and helped rebury remains that were exposed from the animal caused erosion. To see literally hundreds of remains, exposed hearths and middens was deeply disturbing.

These animals have no value other than to a bored crabber and should be removed. They are no better than rats.

A: Yes
****
Q: You are highly entertaining and borderline batshit crazy. Dirty air, dirty water, brown black and red people showing proper deference to the white race: pretty much sums up your ideal world, doesn't it?

A: Yes
****
Q: The Alaska born UAF student in my family is very close to graduating and would like to continue her education there, but she feels the school is being torn down around her.  A portion of the population seems strangely anti-education, and some these people are in charge of “fixing the deficit”, which begs questions over our collective future.  A majority of citizens support  education in general for their families, but do they want only educated baristas and cashiers?  Do they want their adult children to leave Alaska for better education and opportunities?

A:
No
****