We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

Example Input: In fact, gun control laws have been around for over 200 years so apparently the founding fathers didn't see the second amendment as a barrier to such laws.
Example Output: Valid

Example Input: The police have absolutely no way of telling who is in possession of an illegal and unregistered firearm, and there's not a law that California can pass to do a thing about it.
Example Output: Valid

Example Input: So what happens is they call for more protection, more security, more police, more laws, more protection.
Example Output:
Valid