In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: threat and non-threat. Threat is a statement that someone will be hurt or harmed, especially if the person does not do something in particular.

Ex Input:
Comment: When I said I am not pro-Jewish I also said I wasn't anti-Jewish. I to be "pro" something requires me to want more of it - which I don't because it's not MY decision to make. How many children Jewish people have is entirely THEIR decision and I respect that.

I believe, above all, in live and let live.
But live-and-let-live is a form of tolerance. Tolerance is a peace treaty. I'll let you be whoever the hell you want to be, think whatever you want, believe whatever crazy stuff you want and defend your right to do so.
But like any peace treaty, it can only apply to others who sign onto the same thing. You must agree to do the same for me. 

You believe in Jesus ? Good for you. You try to make LAWS to force ME to obey what you say his laws are: we have a problem.
You believe in Allah ? Good for you. You try to interfere in my life because of it - problem.

The vast majority of all people accept the treaty. The minority of fundamentalists do not and get no tolerance.

Ex Output:
Non-threat


Ex Input:
Comment: There is no such thing as a natural order outside the minds of those who believe in it.  It is a meme, not a moral reality.  Reality is where people live and where science happens.  Gays with a petri dish are as open to children as anyone so there is no invalidity or impediment.

Ex Output:
Non-threat


Ex Input:
Comment: "will stop at nothing to smear their ideological opponents — deception, distortion and dirty tactics"

Hmm, this sounds like the modus operandi of the left, if you ask me. I never heard of this happening to 60 Minutes and their video hit pieces.

Ex Output:

Non-threat