In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Example Input: Comment: Yes, whatever precedent or wording or function that can be found, to remove Meredith from the Senate - a man few Canadians consider worthy of dignity or respect. Men like him, with financial power and connections, who groom teen aged girls for sex, are a dime a dozen in Canada. The Senate risks wide perception of total uselessness if Meredith remains.
Example Output: Non-sexual-explicit

Example Input: Comment: Right Steve, because the McGuinty, Butts, Wynne's "green" plan is paying off in spades... the Ontario Liberals are a national embarrassment, they have no credibility and their "green" plan has turned out to be an absolute failure. Canadians who actually work for a living understand this, the smug limousine liberals who will be protected by fat golden pensions couldn't care less about rising costs of living and weaker economic competitiveness, it's not going to have any material impact on Wynne's ability to sip daiquiris in Cabo. This new tax will hurt working Canadians with higher living expenses and less economic opportunity.Trudeau operates with a smug sense of unearned entitlement, he lives in a cushioned dream of puff and ignorance. Butts sewered Ontario and now he wants to double down with the same incompetent policies on the rest of Canada.
Example Output: Non-sexual-explicit

Example Input: Comment: Don't blame the soldier.

The ones authorizing these shootings at a 3.5 kilometer distance without a declaration of war are the real cowards.

How's this any more courageous than using drones, Bill Gee et al ?
Example Output:
Non-sexual-explicit