In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

Ex Input:
Comment: Blacks, coloreds and Indians where not the target of the hatred that BPs policies where aimed at. Whilst the people where used by BP it was towards Whites that BP targeted the hatred. WMC, not BMC or CMC.

Ex Output:
Identity-attack


Ex Input:
Comment: you clearly are stupid to note your own lobby document.

Ex Output:
Non-identity-attack


Ex Input:
Comment: LOL.  Never thought of it like that.  First time he turned up to shriek and flail was--IIRC--to comment on my 2015 Nat'l Feral Cat Day editorial.  At least two of the other cat-nutter commentators in here posted last year as well.  Heh--and they call US 'trolls'.

The embarrassing thing about Roy is that last year anti-TNR commentators (from elsewhere and who didn't know him) thought he was a teenager because of the frantic idiocy and immaturity of his posts.  One of the 'lurkers' in here whom I know is on our side probably remembers too, because he made lengthy, patient efforts to reason with him, and Roy acted like a baboon and hurled heaps of childish crap at him in return.

I'll give him credit for putting a little more effort into the debate than he did last year, but now he seems to simply have degenerated into tantrums and name-calling.  What seems to work (although it's taking a little longer this time) is to ridicule him until he gets sufficiently butt-hurt and leaves...

Ex Output:

Non-identity-attack