We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Q: Sent1: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time.
 Sent2: How can you justify teaching a generation of children that to stop killers from killing because killing is wrong, we should kill them?

A: Not similar
****
Q: Sent1: The death penalty (because of appeals) costs more than solitary confinement for life, both of which would ensure that the person would never kill again.
 Sent2: Can life imprisonment for a definite yes, prevent a murderer from killing again?

A: Not similar
****
Q: Sent1: But I oppose the death penalty because it has the capacity to kill innocent people.
 Sent2: As far as someone killing while in prison, or escaping and killing innocents, I have addressed this too, and have stated that this is part of the reason I support the death penalty.

A:
Not similar
****