In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine the neutral choice based on your inference from the statement and your commonsense knowledge. The neutral choice is a sentence that neither agrees nor disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3', corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence. If sentence X agrees with sentence Y, one's correctness follows from the other one. If sentence X disagrees with sentence Y, they can not be correct at the same time.

[EX Q]: Statement: He would have had ample time to remove them and destroy them." Choices: 1. He didn't know where they were hidden. 2. He'd have had enough time to burn them. 3. He'd have had plenty of time to destroy them.
[EX A]: 2

[EX Q]: Statement: 1 Many of the challenges discussed in that series represent long-standing, difficult, and complex problems that our work has shown will not be easily or quickly resolved. Choices: 1. The series on workplace safety discusses many challenges that are not easy to solve.  2. That series discusses several challenges that won't be easily overcome.  3. The challenges which are discussed in the series are ones that can be quickly solved. 
[EX A]: 1

[EX Q]: Statement: If, for example, there were no benefits of reducing PM concentrations below the proposed PM2. Choices: 1. To give an example, if lowering PM concentrations below the suggested PM2 provided no benefits. 2. This doesn't give an example. 3. Then this would mean that we need to start from the beginning again.
[EX A]:
3