You will be given three sentences. Read them, then identify a noun phrase (person, place, or thing) or event that is shared between all three sentences. As the output, write the span of the text corresponding to that phrase in each sentence. Keep the order of the sentences, that is, your answer should look like: 1: *a phras from sentence 1e* 2: *a phras from sentence 2* 3: *a phrase from sentence 3*

Input: Consider Input: 1: Increasingly , people want to give their money to brands -- political as well as commercial -- that have a set of values they can also buy into . 2: A recent global study found that 63 % of consumers would buy a brand they perceive as authentic over its competitors , and more than 60 % would recommend an organization they perceive to be authentic . 3: Pease : Consumers are increasingly valuing brands perceived as authentic . Does the Clinton brand qualify ?

Output: 1: people 2: consumers 3: Consumers


Input: Consider Input: 1: ( CNN ) We might never truly comprehend what drove co-pilot Andreas Lubitz to crash Germanwings Flight 9525 into the French Alps on March 24 , killing everyone on board . 2: How much did his battle with depression affect his fitness to fly ? 3: Andreas Lubitz , the co-pilot who crashed the Germanwings flight , battled with depression .

Output: 1: co-pilot Andreas Lubitz 2: his 3: Andreas Lubitz , the co-pilot who crashed the Germanwings flight


Input: Consider Input: 1: That section of the law has effectively been ignored , beyond a first attempt at a comprehensive report published in 1996 . 2: As the Las Vegas Review-Journal editorialized in 2011 :  How many lives might be saved if taxpayers everywhere were better informed about police shootings ? 3: Federal law on reporting of such shootings goes unenforced -- how many instances do we never hear about ? he asks .


Output: 1: section of the law 2: better informed about police shootings 3: Federal law on reporting of such shootings goes unenforced