In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

Q: Comment: Such is the ways in which we have decided as a society as to how we we deal with misfits; those who march to the beat of another drum; those we can "put away" for not following the "norms" that have been established; those who are annoyingly bothersome; those who can't follow the rules; those with some find of deficiencies deemed difficult to handle, etc.  Do we consider these means to be the most effective and successful ways in dealing with these "problems"?  Sure doesn't seem like it, but, we seem to go on our merry way heading in this direction.  How come?

A: Non-identity-attack
****
Q: Comment: Yeah right... it is obvious to people with working brain cells that the lyin' bunch of nuts at CNN is on the way out - only people who 'watch' are force fed at USA airports.......... Buh bye CNN, hope you lose all your money and viewers down the drain...

A: Non-identity-attack
****
Q: Comment: Great article, but needs editing. Very clunky in places, some funny misplaced modifiers (did emails really come during the 1960s and 70s?). Hard to take poor writing seriously.

A:
Non-identity-attack
****