We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Sent1: Gun control does nothing to make anyone safer or save lives.
 Sent2: Less gun control probably means more criminals will have guns, however it also means more civilian lives will be saved.
Not similar

Sent1: We have guns and we still have crime and lots of gun deaths.
 Sent2: Though I think we're gun obsessed in our culture, and a lot of times, we can defend ourselves more effectively without guns.
Not similar

Sent1: 1) Protection - The argument suggests that guns protect us from dangerous individuals.
 Sent2: I like how anti gun people say we need to protect everyone from the rare gun events by banning guns, but when someone suggests banning the more frequent hammer and club attacks, they can justify those deaths.

Not similar