In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.

Example Input: Comment: How often is cannabis ever the main reason for a murder in this town?  Give me a break. Legal cannabis will make things safer, not more dangerous.
Example Output: Agree

Example Input: Comment: There are almost 8B people living on this planet, maybe more than half live in the countries that could qualify them as refugees. Are we kidding ourselves? You can't take everyone who shows up at your doorsteps without jeopardizing your own social order
Example Output: Agree

Example Input: Comment: I do not disagree Teleology, and really this should be the first article in a series of science based pieces on the subject. But too often these days we get hundreds of 'anectodal opinion' pieces that promote the only 'correct' viewpoint society should have. These feel good groupthink pieces are largely spurious, fallacious or based on little reasoning or hard statistically relevant data. Thus, when an opposing viewpoint is published that in a mere few thousand words attempts to bring rigorous, rational and data supported thinking back to the debate; I for one applaud it, even if it is not 100% perfect or complete.

I do hope Ms. Soh is not silenced and continues to write such reasoned, data based and as objective as possible, articles.
Example Output:
Agree