In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

Ex Input:
Sentence: Bill passed the gameboy to John because his turn was over.
 Reason: The 'his' refers to bill because the sentence was about bills action to pass the gameboy so his is referencing bill. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

Ex Output:
Correct


Ex Input:
Sentence: John was doing research in the library when he heard a man humming and  whistling. He was very annoyed.
 Reason: The 'He' refers to john because library work needs a quite surrounding. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

Ex Output:
Correct


Ex Input:
Sentence: The path to the lake was blocked, so we couldn't reach it .
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the lake because The path is something you use to get to the lake, you're already on the path. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

Ex Output:

Correct