In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine the neutral choice based on your inference from the statement and your commonsense knowledge. The neutral choice is a sentence that neither agrees nor disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3', corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence. If sentence X agrees with sentence Y, one's correctness follows from the other one. If sentence X disagrees with sentence Y, they can not be correct at the same time.
--------
Question: Statement: Historian Thomas Reeves believes that, despite the media's reluctance to look into Kennedy's private life, if he had lived to have a second  [T]he realities of his lechery and his dealings with Sam Giancana might have leaked out while he was still in office, gravely damaging the presidency. Choices: 1. Thomas Reeves is a historian. 2. Thomas Reeves is a short, fat man. 3. Thomas Reeves is an artist.

Answer: 2


Question: Statement: Return the sun to its course. Choices: 1. The sun is way off of its course.  2. Leave the sun as is.  3. Put the sun back to normal. 

Answer: 1


Question: Statement: The horns on his head continue a traditional medieval mistranslation of the Hebrew for halo-like rays of light. Choices: 1. The horns on his head are a literal and correct translation of the Hebrew for crown of light. 2. The mistranslation of this piece does not at all affect how it is viewed by the art community. 3. The horns displayed on his head further perpetuate a medieval mistranslation of the Hebrew expression for halo-like light rays.

Answer:
2