In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence can be inferred from the statement. Incorrect choices change the meaning in important ways or have details that are not mentioned in the statement. Indicate your answer as 1,2, or 3 corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.

Input: Consider Input: Statement: The thundering Republican condemnations of the special prosecutor back then are just like the thundering Democratic condemnations today, down to the very phrase, four years and $40 million. Choices:  1. The thundering Republic condemnations back then are similar in many ways to the thundering Democratic condemnations of today.  2. The thundering Republican condemnations are in no way similar to the thundering Democratic condemnations. 3. The thundering Republican condemnations are four years and $40 million. 

Output: 3


Input: Consider Input: Statement: And it is impossible to see how this difference from Rust has any bearing upon the First Amendment question, which, to repeat, is whether the funding scheme is 'manipulated' to have a 'coercive effect' on those who do not hold the subsidized position. Choices:  1. It is not possible to see how this difference from Rust has any bearing on the First Amendment question. 2. The difference from Rust on the First Amendment question is very noticeable. 3. The question that was asked it really rather very subjective.

Output: 1


Input: Consider Input: Statement: More and more we are seeing this as a problem. Choices:  1. We are increasingly seeing this as a problem. 2. This problem is rapidly disappearing and will soon be gone. 3. This problem involves socks being lost from the laundry pile.


Output: 1