instruction:
We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.
question:
Sent1: I don't believe that they should because if you kill someone, they won't have the chance to either get rehabilitated nor will they have the chance to actually regret what they have done.
 Sent2: I think at least if they are innocent they would be happier as I am living without that safety net than being killed because we don't think they should have a right to fight for thier lives leagally.
answer:
Not similar


question:
Sent1: If someone is bad enough to be considered for the death penalty then they must have had sure evidence that they are guilty if they are then they shouldn't deserve the right to live among people they could kill
 Sent2: An argument for putting people to death is so that they can never escape and kill again.
answer:
Not similar


question:
Sent1: Life without parole lets you fix that mistake since they can be released if they are found innocent - not so with the death penalty.
 Sent2: If someone is wrongly convicted of a crime and put in jail, they can be released if they're found to be innocent.
answer:

Similar