Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.

Example Input: This 20 page opinion is a real example of legal hair splitting.  The Supreme Court  acknowledges that libel is actionable per se (without money damage or special harm) if false information is published in a written form (like this site).  They then wander off to the Supreme Court and 9th Circuit opinions and decide that in spite of all that, basically that “two-faced,” “crooked” and “rude.” were not 'provably false' and based on all the facts and circumstances, protected by the 1st Amendment, in the facts of  this case.  This is going to make such lawsuits even more unpredictable than they already were, in my opinion.
Example Output: No

Example Input: Okay, I for one am curious what cases this happened in.  Please include citations in your post, so we can all judge for ourself about the reality of your "proof".
Example Output: No

Example Input: They will leave. Taking with them all contributions to Alaska economy. Be real fkcing careful what you wish for. When companies go, after they realize they are better off without bs from a governor over his head, crime will surge.
Example Output:
Yes