We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.
--------
Question: No more pain, no more suffering, no more hardship, no more earthly demands, no more constantly uncertaintly, no more worrying, no more problems.

Answer: Invalid


Question: You can't limit appeals because people have been redeemed in their 3rd and 4th appeals.

Answer: Valid


Question: Does it make anyone safer, rather than the guilty one spending life in prison?

Answer:
Valid