We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

[EX Q]: Scott Blonien, assistant secretary of the department, characterized Stern's objections as more individual than professional.
[EX A]: Invalid

[EX Q]: The death penalty assures that an incorragable criminal never has the opportunity to kill anybody else.
[EX A]: Valid

[EX Q]: to put animal bashing in context with the original arguement, murderers and serial killers are profiled in their early years by animal crulety, thats how they start!
[EX A]:
Invalid