We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

[EX Q]: As to all of the other demands for more and more and more and more and more, gun control, then a never ending list loopholes on all that is proposed, see the last 300 iterations of this exact same thread.
[EX A]: Valid

[EX Q]: Secondly, the reason that interpreting the Second Amendment isn't necessary is because Congress doesn't have the enumerated power to take guns away from the citizens.
[EX A]: Valid

[EX Q]: There is little question that the second amendment was meant to preserve the RKBA for individuals, but without clarification on Heller, we could essentially end up with our RKBA frozen in time.
[EX A]:
Valid