We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

Every fear of theirs is there in your positions; you use the words to invent a regulating power, you use the words to erect strict conditioning and qualifications on the right merely recognized and secured by the Amendment.
Valid

Unfortunatly, the anti gunners like to use example of the few times that there are violent episodes in our schools to push their agenda.
Valid

The question is whether or not it really matters if guns were used less for self defense and more for aggression.

Valid