In this task, you will be shown a sentence, and you should determine whether it is overruling or non-overruling. In law, an overruling sentence is a statement that nullifies a previous case decision as a precedent by a constitutionally valid statute or a decision by the same or higher ranking court which establishes a different rule on the point of law involved. Classify your answers into overruling or non-overruling
--------
Question: to the extent treadwell, supra at 742743, 684 s.e.2d 244 and wilkes v. state, 293 ga.app. 724, 726(2), 667 s.e.2d 705 (2008) can be interpreted to hold otherwise, they are overruled.

Answer: overruling


Question: 2 k. o'malley, j. grenig, & w. lee, federal jury practice and instructions: criminal  31:03, p. 225 (6th ed. 2008) (emphasis added); see also id.,  31:02, at 220 (explaining that a defendant must ""intend to agree and must intend that the substantive offense be committed "" (emphasis added)).

Answer: non-overruling


Question: whatever may be said for the proposition that vines was overruled sub silentio by spears, we conclude that insofar as it stands for the proposition that a utility company owes no duty to persons who may, through foreseeable negligence, come in contact with its poles, vines must be overruled.

Answer:
overruling