The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the uv-part strategy, otherwise output No. uv-part is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to undermine the requirements of the opponent. For instance, suggesting that the opponent would not need more firewood since they already have the basic supplies or a suggestion that there might be a store near the campsite where the opponent can get the supplies instead.

Context: 'Hi! I am interesting in claiming all 3 of the water, as well as 2 firewood and 1 food. Does this work for you?' 'No I need more firewood' 'Okay, can I ask why the firewood is important for you? 🙂'
Utterance: 'You can find more wood in the forest but I'm going somewhere where there's not a loot of trees ☹️'
Yes

Context: 'So do we. My kids are on meds so they need a lot of water and food' 'Which one do you prefer most?' 'They sort of need more water for their meds'
Utterance: 'I'm sorry to hear that! But can you spare 1 for me since you probably don't need all the water.'
Yes

Context: 'I could use some more water as I get dehydrated easily. Since you have enough, I could give you and extra package of food for your water.' 'That sounds like a deal, what would you like to do as far as the firewood goes?' 'I really need to keep warm with my not so good sleeping bag.☹️ I would be willing to do this. I get two packages of firewood and three packages of water and I will give you two packages of food and one package of firewood. You have plenty of water so you will not miss that.. '
Utterance: 'This sounds good to me, unless you would be able to part with three packages of food?'

Yes