In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Example Input: Comment: But Brexit, Trump, etc. have shown people can be di*cks! Many of them don't even know what they are voting for.
Example Output: Sexual-explicit

Example Input: Comment: During the day I believe he went to prospective houses where he hoped to harm individuals, knocking on doors during the day where he asked for work.  He is an admitted liar.  He is manipulative producing his penciled writing.  It may be the cover story.  He is definitely a thug perhaps for political purposes.  He may not be who he presents himself at all.  He may just be an operative of some type perhaps a paid assassin.  How would you like him showing up at your door with your family there - while you are at work.  He may have.  Not buying his penciled story.  He is an admitted liar among other qualities.  He no doubt has his admirers and cohorts in various interests.  The one's he and his associates have not "mentioned".  Gullible reporting?  What's his military record?  I don't believe his story.  He is a bad character for sure.
Example Output: Non-sexual-explicit

Example Input: Comment: Correct...the names on these indictments will be Obama, Hillary Clinton, Bill Clinton, Loretta Lynch, John Podesta, Robby Mook, Huma Abedin and the rest of corrupt donkeys or obstruction of justice and Hillary's home server.
Example Output:
Non-sexual-explicit