In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.

[EX Q]: Comment: The headline reads "destroy jobs, save the planet".  Does Wente support the opposite ?
[EX A]: Disagree

[EX Q]: Comment: What is truly disturbing in this is that between the young people now charged, the friends they certainly told or suspected they were involved (and who knows how many other in their circles had knowledge or suspicions and said nothing as they watched the news reports of the agony of David's family, as well as the hundreds of people trying to help solve the mystery) none of these many people bothered to speak up to alleviate the suffering.  The utter cold-bloodedness of it all is unthinkable.
[EX A]: Agree

[EX Q]: Comment: Free wifi is a curse at some locations as I have noticed. There is a Tim Horton's in the building where my son's condo is located, and every time we decide to meet there for a coffee, there is almost NEVER any table available. You can go by hours later and the many of the same people are there. Given limited seating, often one person is taking a table/booth for four. 

It must be a real dilemma for shop owners and truly a balancing act. I have left a coffee shop where there is no seating and tried to find another one or simply didn't buy. It has to hurt business when purchasing one coffee makes customers feel they can stay for hours.
[EX A]:
Agree