We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

[EX Q]: The death penalty has been found to be a more effective deterrent to crimes against children.
[EX A]: Valid

[EX Q]: And 83% seems to be the common error rate for "innocents" claims by death penalty opponents.
[EX A]: Valid

[EX Q]: Isn't the idea that if God forgave without the sacrifice then he'd be turning justice aside?
[EX A]:
Invalid