In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: toxic and non-toxic. Toxicity is defiend as anything that is rude, disrespectful, or unreasonable that would make someone want to leave a converation.

Example Input: Comment: The Sioux, including Sitting Bull and Red Cloud accepted the terms of the Treaty of 1868 which placed the northern boundary at the 46th parallel and the Missouri River. Well south of the area of the pipeline. In 1873 an executive order was enacted that moved the border north to the Cannon Ball River, again well south of the pipeline location. The Sioux have accepted the treaty terms for that last 148 years. I would say that kind of trumps your argument, (pun intended). The treaty ;problems are with the Treaty of 1877 that was done without the consent of the Sioux as required by the Treaty  of 1868. It also broke up the one big reservation into several smaller reservations and took away the Black Hills, but the Sioux, rightfully, have never accepted the Treaty of 1877. I think they never should accept the Treaty of 1877. However, in every case, the northern boundary is the Cannon Ball River, still well south of the pipeline due to an executive order in 1873 moving the boundary north.
Example Output: Non-toxic

Example Input: Comment: Casti_Connubii,_119-122._Very_specific
Example Output: Non-toxic

Example Input: Comment: The rollout of this wage increase is the Green energy act all over again.  The Liberals didn't listen to dissenting voices then and they aren't listening now.  We all know now how bad the GRE was for the Province and our great grandchildren will be paying for it.  The wage increases aren't going to end any better.
Example Output:
Non-toxic