We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Q: Sent1: Even the people who did the study saying that innocents had been executed admitted that they cannot prove same.
 Sent2: There have been numerous people who were presumed innocent after execution because the evidence showed that they were not guilty.

A: Not similar
****
Q: Sent1: People use the argument that we should not execute people based on the possibility that they may be innocent, but they could care less if we lock someone up for life who may be innocent.
 Sent2: If they don't want to kill an innocent person, stick to life in prison.

A: Not similar
****
Q: Sent1: Just because you can be rehabiliated, the crime you may have done may have been so henius that society demands your removal, but not death.
 Sent2: You can't just assume the death penalty is a crime.

A:
Not similar
****