In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

Q: Comment: This article will fall on deaf ears. The liberal media is complicit in under reporting the opposite, namely black racism against whites.

A: Identity-attack
****
Q: Comment: I'm a bit disappointed to discover that their "tuning in" will be accomplished in such a mundane way as tuning in to a livestream.  I was hoping for something a bit more demonstrative of their unique history.  Something like looking into the bottom of a stovepipe hat using magic spectacles and seeing the broadcast.

A: Non-identity-attack
****
Q: Comment: Are you kidding me. Trans gender bathroom bill, westboro, god hates fags, attempting to pint gays as pedophiles, painting gays as the cause of the aids epidemic, and constantly judging everyone through a very negative lens has been the religious rights mode of attack.

Then you dare come on here and again attack people that call out intolerance. It is not intolerance to point out hate, and your side peddles in hate of everything they didn't like.

Your side has spent years shouting down and name calling anyone that doesn't agree, then you come here and blame the other side. Par for the course, I guess.

Party of Personal Responsibility or is it Party of Her Emails now?

A:
Identity-attack
****