Craft one correct answer to the question given in input. To make it more interesting, try to use non-stereotypical language if possible. Make sure your correct answer is reasonably long, consistent with the context, and requires common sense (instead of explicit extraction from the context.) In your answer, use as few words as possible from the given context. Use a response that is uncommon/non-stereotypical, so that it is less predictable. To be less repetitive, please vary your language for each question.

[EX Q]: Context: My respect for him was immeasurable . However , what I love and admire about him the most was his undying love for his wife . They had a lifelong love affair with one another that was magically romantic and one of the most beautiful things to witness on a daily basis . They were practically inseparable and their lives revolved around one another . 
Question: What might be different if the man did n't have an undying love for his wife ?
[EX A]: The narrator would n't have respect for him.

[EX Q]: Context: We did n't do much today , other than travel on a bus for 9 hours going south . We paused in Chillen ( birth place of Chilean revolutionary hero Bernardo O'Higgins ) and did some flea market shopping . i ca n't understand a word people say to me here . 
Question: What 's a possible reason they traveled on a bus ?
[EX A]: Because the bus ride was cheap .

[EX Q]: Context: Beefheart , Tom Waits and John Zorn built , their music was ridiculous , but engagingly so . These were n't rank amateurs banging on a bunch of gear , either . Man Man were very clearly trained professionals who chose to use their abilities for evil , carving out their own niche in the lucrative " insane circus music " genre . 
Question: What may be a plausible fact about the group I am talking about ?
[EX A]:
I am talking about a band .