The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the vouch-fair strategy, otherwise output No. vouch-fair is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to call out fairness for personal benefit, either when acknowledging a fair deal or when the opponent offers a deal that benefits them. This can be through an explicit call out or can be implied.
--------
Question: Context: 'But you get everything you wanted. You said you needed 3 water, I offered it to you.' 'but i can't give you 3 food and 3 firewood, thats 6 items vs the 3 water' 'Sure you can.  If you really want water the most, why would you care about the rest as much?😮'
Utterance: 'most does not mean i have to neglect the rest, anyways either a) I get 3 water, 2 food and 0 firewood or b) I get 1 water, 2 food and 2 firewood'

Answer: Yes


Question: Context: '😮 Food is #1 for me as well! What a pickle. My #2 is Firewood and my #3 is Water. We can split the Food and divided the Firewood and Food based on how important they are to us.' 'True we can , I'd be willing to just take one of the foods if you'd be willing to do that ? Then we can decide on the others ' '🙂v it sound's like we're on the right track! I'll gladly take 2 Food. How would you feel about taking all of the Water, while I take all of the Firewood?'
Utterance: 'Not really liking that , but I'd be willing to split the water with you if I could take 2 of those 🙂'

Answer: Yes


Question: Context: 'I want a lot of water my friend. I will be hiking and what I hav is not enough' 'ok, but i want 2 pack of food, 2 pack of water and 1 pack of firewood' 'I also want 2 water. Then I can take 1 from the other items.'
Utterance: 'ok fine '

Answer:
No