In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: threat and non-threat. Threat is a statement that someone will be hurt or harmed, especially if the person does not do something in particular.

Ex Input:
Comment: Also depends on the butt, some of them are actually pretty nice.

Ex Output:
Non-threat


Ex Input:
Comment: I hate Trump and I will say and do anything to destroy him.
I am a liberal and work for the MSM and have the power to publish Trump hate propaganda and fake news everyday 364 days a year except on Christmas.  Trump has to go. Hillary can make a comeback and nothing can stop her from crawling back out from the swamp.

Ex Output:
Threat


Ex Input:
Comment: Competence isn't black and white. A doctor may be extraordinarily competent in family practice, but not so as a surgeon. The question to be asked is, can this person be brought up to speed in those areas where his competence is lacking? The testimony before the tribunal was that yes, he could be brought up to speed. The tribunal rejected that testimony, preferring their own much harsher assessment of Camp's competence. Having said that, Camp's competence regarding sexual assault law is now a moot point anyway. Since the trial in question, he was elevated to a different branch of the judiciary where he will never deal with that area of law. However he will never serve in that position if the tribunal has its way.

Ex Output:

Non-threat