Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.

Input: Consider Input: if that birdie on the podium at sanders rally in portland had landed on trumps podium...? he would have tried to swat it, cursed it for pooping on the podium,  all while dozens of his supporters pulling out their legal firearms and taking aim at the little birdie.  ***yeah well,  if elected, trump is no longer a "businessman" and the rules of law do apply.  BTW - any politician can just blow off their past? "that's the way business gets transacted? " really?   is that really your response?  that is one dumb reply doc.  just dumb.  perhaps the dumbest, relevant comment I've seen.  and yeah the trump horse and pony "show" may light the heavens in a way WE have yet to see , courtesy of every other insane world leader.

Output: No


Input: Consider Input: I'd argue that month to month and no lease rentals aren't compatible with housing security, and are being used by people in situations in which they aren't appropriate.   I think stories in this piece, and all the protests about no-cause evictions are direct evidence of this.  

How do we respond to that problem without nudging tenants and landlords alike into longer term leases?

Output: Yes


Input: Consider Input: The state is paying a huge sum for Furie to drill down deep into formations thought to hold large pockets of gas and oil that the previous drillers never bothered to drill to because they had access to smaller pockets already producing. The "renaissance" was to get them to drill to that "deep" zone. It wasn`t classified or secret if it`s the same deal I`m thinking about.  You`ll notice the companies never discuss the depths they are referring to?... there`s a reason for that.  When they hit the pocket it then becomes confidential information between the DNR and the drilling company.  But we do know what the "intended" depth was that the state contracted with Furie to go to, before it reported the find.  I would think the depth is confidential from the public unless I`m mistaken.  Large credits and subsidies should end now that Conoco/Agrium have enough gas, demonstrating there is no longer a need for Alaska to suffer fiscally as there is no shortage of gas anymore.


Output: No