Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.

Let's create an industry that provides lots of jobs, like thousands of jobs, and then let's make sure it can export lots of stuff, like billions of dollars of value. That surely would be great! 

Oh yeah, that would be the commercial fishing industry in Alaska, which does supply many low paying wage jobs to many non-residents, who take most of their earnings out of state. 

Commercial fishing harvests and processes billions of pounds of seafood from Alaska, with an export value of $5 to $6 billion. Yet they produce no net taxes to Alaska, and are subsidized by the state. It is so bad now ADFG is going into the commercial fish business through cost recovery fisheries. 

Where are the journalists on this story? One of the largest industries in the state pays no net taxes to the state, ADFG is doing cost recovery fisheries just to keep the doors open, the seafood industry cries it makes no money on $6 billion in exports, and no one in the media says the emperor has no clothes?
No

You say: 
"Funny how ADN reporters fail to highlight things like the fact that after this ordeal, a Cordova Trooper paid for the victim’s 5 night hotel stay out of pocket (things like that are not unusual)..." 
but in the story it is stated that a trooper paid. 

See "According to Brandenburg, one of the troopers at the Cordova post covered a five-night hotel stay for him out of his own pocket."

What does what you write "...day before another ADN reporter’s headline about the shooting of a violent man with knives in his hands who rushed troopers after they try to talk him down, resulting in them shooting him to save themselves from being slashed is summarized by the headline “Troopers shoot and kill man on his birthday.” No bias there, right ADN?

got to do with the story about Christopher and why the heartache about the difference of the two above references?
Yes

What a sleaze bag !!!

Yes