In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: threat and non-threat. Threat is a statement that someone will be hurt or harmed, especially if the person does not do something in particular.

Input: Consider Input: Comment: Real men also don't get drunk and beat their wives with a bunk ladder. He did. He deserves every bit of punishment due to him.

Output: Threat


Input: Consider Input: Comment: The only genital activity the bishops need to worry about are their own.

Output: Non-threat


Input: Consider Input: Comment: Well you may CALL it a fake comment, but Trump won less than 1% of the African American vote. Trump called Mexicans rapists and drug dealers; a hispanic miss Universe "Miss housekeeping', and offered an outright fascist plan for labelling musllims and mass deportations of immigrants. 
He was investigated and charged by the Justice Department for systemic racist policies in his New York tenements. 
He has appointed the whitest and malest cabinet since Reagan. 
So you can call it a "Fake Comment" if you want, but the problem is that it's basically bang on. The man ran on a racist platform, he ran racist businesses, he's got a racist cabinet, so he's probably, in fact, a racist. 
What exactly is the evidence you have on the contrary?


Output: Non-threat