instruction:
In this task, you're given a statement, and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence clearly disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3' corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.
question:
Statement: Opponents said reformers shouldn't jump the gun, since 1) the decision did not deal with soft money; and 2) the court refused to overturn its 1976 decision that campaign spending limits do impede free speech. Choices:  1. Opponents and reformers should act immediately without any other consideration. 2. Opponents and reformers should not act prematurely without considering all of the factors.  3. Opponents and reformers should not act with too much haste without considering hard money.
answer:
1


question:
Statement: It's no good arguing about how it was done. Choices:  1. There's no point in arguing about the logistics. 2. It'd be better for us to argue about how it was done. 3. Arguing is going to waste too much time and we need a solution right now.
answer:
2


question:
Statement: Ut's photo is of a crowded highway winding eternally through hell, and it won't let you go. Choices:  1. There is no clear intention in the picture.  2. The picture shows an eternal journey through hell.  3. The photo shows what hell would be like. 
answer:

1