instruction:
In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.
question:
Comment: All lives matter. No color should be different. Pull a gun, resist arrest face the consequences. Community come together and reconnect. Stop all this crap.
answer:
Obscene


question:
Comment: Susan, that was a wonderful editorial however clearly you haven't been paying attention to the endless stream of propaganda spewing from pot activists.  If you did, you'd know that stoners are simply awesome.  They wouldn't hurt a flea. They never, ever, ever, ever drive while high and if they do, they're a million times safer than regular drivers because they're so gosh darn careful. Those stories you read about the increase in accidents since pot was legalized are wrong.  Legalizing pot eliminated drug crimes.  Those stories about recent pot deals and shootings gone bad are lies planted by anti pot forces. The stories about stoners selling Washington pot in other states in direct violation of the law are wrong too...gosh they would never do something silly like that.

/voting against the legalization of pot was definitely in my self interest
//why do you think they call it dope?
answer:
Non-obscene


question:
Comment: This article is a shining example of raw ignorance in how the system works.  Joan admits she's biased, but attempts to minimize it by misdirecting the reader as to the reasons for her bias.  Fact: the 60-vote threshold only becomes relevant if the minority party stages a filibuster. Breaking a filibuster, or “moving for cloture” in the parlance of the Senate, requires 60 votes. A vote to approve requires only 51.  Neither of Obama’s appointees faced a filibuster. Nor did President Bush’s first nominee, John Roberts.  Seven of the eight justices currently on the Court, prior to Gorsuch, did not face cloture votes, meaning they were not subject to the 60-vote threshold to which Democrats are insisting nominees are consistently held. 
The only nominees to face filibusters along ideological lines were filibustered by Democrats. Gorsuch wasn't going to be filibustered for any other reason than that he was Trump's nominee.
What's weakening our Democracy is fanatical progressivism.
answer:

Non-obscene