The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.

[EX Q]: Context: 'We can do that! How do you want to split up the firewood?' 'It's an odd number so someone has to get 2. But in order to make it fair if one of us takes two then the other should get one of the lower priority items. What do you think?' 'That sounds fair to me! I am good either way.'
Utterance: 'That's very nice of you. If it is ok with you them I'll take two firewood and 2 water and you can have the rest.'
[EX A]: No

[EX Q]: Context: 'Yes, I'd definitely be interested. How are you doing?' 'Not bad, not bad. How are you. What's on your mind for camping? ' 'I'm doing well. We're desperately needing wood. We didn't realize how cold it would be as it is our first time here. There is none around our area so we are really concerned about staying warm especially at night. We also forgot a bag of food, so that's another need for us.'
Utterance: 'True. Turns out i'm dealing with similar situation, we didn't expect weather to be as cold, so extra wood is on my mind as well. Everyone might need to go to bed earlier and cook food that cooks short time since we low on wood !'
[EX A]: Yes

[EX Q]: Context: 'I am going to be camping for a couple of weeks, so I will need quite a bit. I also realized some additional water would be good, because I have some meals that need me to boil water. Maybe you can have 2 firewood in exchange for me having one of your waters? Then you would still have plenty of water, but also plenty of firewood 🙂' 'So sorry, I just realized you did not agree to the 3 waters in exchange of 3 foods. if you want a water, i will also will need one food. just to make things more fair on my end. If not i am looking at 2 waters, 0 foods, and 1 firewood. But i am willing to compromise for 3 waters, 1 firewood, and 0 foods. and you'll get 3 foods, 2 firewoods, and 0 waters, what do you think?' ' I appreciate your willingness to discuss this, so we both get a fair deal. I would really like if I get 3 food, 1 water, and 1 firewood. Then you would get 2 water and 2 firewood. You said that you really need water and food, so I think that would work best for both of us to get what we need most. What do you think? 🙂'
Utterance: 'Np, problem, water is high in demand on my end with the amount of kiddos I am taking. Water is my main concern, will you be okay with 3 Foods, 2 Firewoods and no water?'
[EX A]:
Yes