Given a document, an entity and its sentiment towards the entity, verify if it is the correct sentiment towards the entity. Answer should be yes or no. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

Q: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Henda Ayari is Neutral . Henda Ayari  a 39-year-old French Muslim author   says  she  was emboldened by all the French women outing and denouncing their sexual aggressors.
"I thought  these women are no different from  me  " said  Ayari  in an interview with Le Parisian. "I also have to denounce what he did to  me ."
So this week  five years after the alleged incident   she  did just that.
 Her  alleged aggressor is Tariq Ramadan  a top scholar of Islam. The 55-year-old theologian's bona fides include being professor of contemporary Islamic studies at Oxford University.
 Ayari  says Ramadan assaulted and raped  her  when  she  turned up for a meeting with  him  in a hotel suite in Paris in 2012.  She  says  he  slapped  her  in the face when  she  resisted.
" He  told me I came for that  and I deserved what I got. That I didn't wear the veil  so I was a prostitute " she told Le Parisian.
 Ayari  says  it  never entered  her  mind that  she  was in any danger when  she  went to  his  room. "I considered  him  like a father figure "  she  said.

A: yes
****
Q: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Paul Haggis is Positive . âI havenât seen that  no â the stunned Swank told Fox News at an FX event in Pasadena  Calif. of the report released just minutes earlier about  Paul Haggis   who won consecutive Oscars for screenwriting the Swank-starring "Million Dollar Baby" and writing and directing "Crash."
 Haggis  was named in a civil lawsuit on December 15  2017 by publicist Haleigh Breest  who claimed the married  64-year-old filmmaker raped her on Jan. 31  2013 in a New York City apartment.
The lawsuit spurred three more women to claim sexual assault and harassment by  Haggis .
According to the Associated Press  one of the accusers claimed  Haggis  made  her  perform non-consensual oral sex and then raped  her .
Another accuser said  Haggis  told  her  âI need to be inside  you .â  She  said  she  was able to escape.
They all said  Haggis  first tried to kiss them. In two of the cases  they said  when they fought back   Haggis  escalated  his  aggression.
The new rape accuser said she was a 28-year-old publicist working on a television show being produced by  Haggis  in 1996 when he called to ask to review photos from the show that night in her office.
When  Haggis  arrived  she said  everyone else had left the office for the night and  he  insisted they speak in a back office. She said  Haggis  began kissing her as soon as they walked into the room.
"I just pulled away.  He  was just glaring at me and came at me again. I was really resisting.  He  said to me  'Do you really want to continue working?'" the woman said. "And then  he  really forced  himself  on me. I was just numb. I didn't know what to do."
 Haggis â lawyer told the AP his client is denying the new accusations  saying  âHe didnât rape anybody.â
 Haggis  has also denied Breest's initial rape allegation in a counter-complaint to the lawsuit  and said the accuser and her lawyer had demanded a $9 million payment to avoid legal action  which he characterized as extortion.
Fox News reached out to  Haggis  and Breest but did not receive comment.
 Haggis  is also well-known for being an outspoken critic of Scientology  which  he  left in 2009.  He  is listed as currently directing the film "Lead and Copper."

A: no
****
Q: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Shulkin is Positive . Dr .  Shulkin  is one of several cabinet secretaries to be accused of lavish spending on travel . Tom Price was dismissed as secretary of health and human services over his use of private jets . Within hours of the report ’ s release   a few Republican lawmakers were calling for Dr .  Shulkin  to resign . But others in Congress and at influential veterans ’ organizations stopped short of that   condemning misuse of funds but reaffirming their support for the secretary . “ A lot of them don ’ t know what to do — they may want him to go   but who would replace him ?” said Paul Rieckhoff   founder of Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America . “ What they get in his place may be very disruptive .” The Department of Veterans Affairs offered only a brief defense of Dr . Shulkin ’ s trip on Wednesday   saying in a statement : “ As  Secretary Shulkin  points out    he  travels far less than any recent V . A . secretary   takes no private jets   and was the first cabinet secretary to post details of his travel online for all to see . That said   accountability and transparency are important values at V . A . under President Trump .” But Dr . Shulkin personally pushed back hard against the findings . “ The report is not accurate   not objective  ” he said in an interview on Wednesday . “ I was horrified when I saw the way the investigator conducted himself   leading the witness with his own interpretation and the bias .” He said the department usually has weeks to review and respond to reports   but he had only two working days . Newsletter Sign Up Continue reading the main story Please verify you ' re not a robot by clicking the box . You must select a newsletter to subscribe to . Sign Up You agree to receive occasional updates and special offers for The New York Times ' s products and services . View all New York Times newsletters . In an unusual 28 - page rebuttal attached to the report by his lawyers   Dr . Shulkin included findings from an independent ethics expert   affidavits from witnesses who contradicted the report   and transcripts of interviews conducted by the investigators that the lawyers said showed bias . The department ’ s chief of staff   Vivieca Wright Simpson   also disputed the findings . The report found that in seeking approval for the secretary ’ s wife   Dr . Merle Bari   to take the trip at public expense   Ms . Wright Simpson misrepresented to the department ’ s ethics office that a planned “ special recognition dinner ” was definite . Wright Simpson ’ s false representations and alteration of an official record may have violated federal criminal statutes  ” the report said   adding that the inspector general had referred the matter to the Justice Department for possible prosecution . The department declined to prosecute . Advertisement Continue reading the main story Ms . Wright Simpson said in an interview on Wednesday that the dinner she mentioned in the email had in fact taken place . She said she was not given any chance to see the inspector general ’ s report or respond to it before its release   despite requests through her lawyer . The report said the secretary and his wife improperly accepted the Wimbledon tickets from Victoria Gosling   an organizer of the 2016 Invictus Games   which brought together wounded veterans for competition . The tickets ’ face price was about $ 350   but their resale value   according to the report   was about $ 3   500 . Accepting such a gift violated ethics standards   according to the report . It recommended that the secretary repay the cost of the tickets and reimburse the government for his wife ’ s travel . Dr .  Shulkin  said  he  would comply with recommendations   but maintained that  he  had done nothing improper .  He  said Ms . Gosling was a personal friend who offered the couple her sister ’ s unused tickets   and that there was nothing unethical in accepting them .  He  said Ms . Wright Simpson ’ s conduct will be investigated   “ and if it reveals she did something wrong   we will take action .” The members of Congress in charge of the committees that oversee the department — Senators Johnny Isakson of Georgia and Jon Tester of Montana   and Representatives Phil Roe of Tennessee and Tim Walz of Minnesota — issued a joint statement expressing disappointment at the allegations detailed in the report . “ We believe that public officials must be held to a higher standard   and whether intentional or not   misusing taxpayer dollars is unacceptable  ” they said in the statement . “ We ’ re counting on Dr . Shulkin to actively address all of the allegations outlined in this report .”

A:
yes
****