In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: insult and non-insult. Insult is any lanugage or act that is disrespectful or scornfully abusive.

Comment: Good point, any theocratic philosophy is a threat to constitutional democracy. Canada had a  blasphemy law. 

Violent theocrats are much worse - regardless of their religion. 

I only meant to say that The Premier was probably referring to violent Muslim theocrats which is essentially what an Islamist is. But the term is too close to Islamic and ends up stereotyping the religion. 

Given that the Ottoman empire ended just 100 years ago,  the link to religious rule is more recent in Islam. About the same time the Federal Reserve was created in America and they are still fighting about that!
Non-insult

Comment: Beijing millionaires and wanna be Beijing millionairesses who squeeze money from the rest of us! And stupid blind white men with blinders!
Insult

Comment: All well and good.  But if any Democrat is elected in 2020 we will quickly return to Obama's approach at the border.  The current situation is costing Democrats many thousands of voters, both present and future.  They will do everything in their power to overcome this problem and once again allow these voters into America, our laws be damned.   Democrats may be scum, but they are not stupid.

Insult