In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.

Input: Consider Input: Comment: Like most far right conservatives you have no clue what Socialism is.

Output: Disagree


Input: Consider Input: Comment: You bring up a really good point about the grocery stores.  When I lived in Asia there were certain foods that I just craved, but could never get.  I didn't feel as though there was some Asian privilege going on.  Rather I realized it was the market.  If there were enough white dudes who wanted to buy something it would have been there.  But there weren't.  I never thought of boohooing about it and claiming I was discriminated against.  Instead, I tried new foods and enjoyed the culture that I was so lucky to get to enjoy.  Now, back home, I have such fond memories and now I search out the foods at Asian markets that I ate and loved when I was there.  And I introduced foods to my family members.  I was appalled when a family member had never had a mango.  We got some and he loved it!  

This white privilege business is nonsense by social justice warriors who never lived through the hard times and want to make a mountain out of a mole hill.

Output: Agree


Input: Consider Input: Comment: There are almost 8B people living on this planet, maybe more than half live in the countries that could qualify them as refugees. Are we kidding ourselves? You can't take everyone who shows up at your doorsteps without jeopardizing your own social order


Output: Agree