We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Q: Sent1: Please tell the murder victims in these other countries that gun control works.
 Sent2: My point was that the theory that more gun control leaves people defenseless does not explain the lower murder rates in other developed nations.

A: Similar
****
Q: Sent1: now imagine if no criminals could get hold of a gun, you wouldn't need a protection, as no criminals have guns.
 Sent2: Gun haters are like the dangerous criminals the gun haters want to keep guns away from.

A: Not similar
****
Q: Sent1: If this is the case then gun control laws will have no effect on who carries melee weapons, so you argument falls apart because 'the law abiding' can remain armed.
 Sent2: Now if you want gun control laws that limit or ban the right to bear arms you are a gun haters.

A:
Not similar
****