In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: threat and non-threat. Threat is a statement that someone will be hurt or harmed, especially if the person does not do something in particular.

[EX Q]: Comment: Ms. Wente, you are an American if I'm not mistaken.  If you don't see the Trump presidency as a huge
tragedy you have no longer the right to write about just anything.  This is not something we can
be easy on.  This is the government of the most powerful nation in the world and it's President is more
a less an idiot who really mostly listens to Steve Bannon a devotee of many fascistic writers and thinkers.
He is not simply out of an American film myth.  Bannon is for real and I'm sure he has been looking for 
a Trump for some time to use as his, and the alt-right conspirators.  Even if Trump goes, what he leaves
behind in form of vice president and cabinet isn't much better.  Bannon may be the past, but the rest
would stay.  And can the US really afford four years under Pence even.
[EX A]: Non-threat

[EX Q]: Comment: "Additionally, the report found that forests in Southeast Alaska will capture more carbon going forward, though it is only a small region of the state."

Why? How? 
"going forward?" Please, let's kill this nonsensical and completely redundant idiom now.
[EX A]: Threat

[EX Q]: Comment: Meanwhile in Canada...

The crazed transition of a bipolar to power.
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
✔  Binge-spending
✔  Feels he's on a mission
✔  Grandiose, delusional ideas
✔  Lacking in judgment, moral boundaries
✔  Violent tendencies, physical bullying in Parliament
[EX A]:
Non-threat