In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Input: Consider Input: Comment: Thing is, the cost of roads are covered by gas taxes, many times over.  I speak as someone who lives midtown and takes TTC and feel that as fellow Ontarians, suburbanites contribute a great deal to our city in many ways, and to the maintenance and development of transportation all over Ontario, at each fill up.  The fact that the City doesn't have funds to pay for the basic services of a city, including the creation and maintenance of infrastructure, means that the budget isn't allocating funds properly or primarily, that the province is not paying its fair share of gas taxes to Toronto.  Gas taxes should go to transit and infrastructure, period.  It'll only get worse thanks to Tory's stubbornness toward rebuilding the east Gardner and above all, sticking with subway rather than LRT in Scarborough.  Lots of money there.  Regardless, I think this is an issue of the province underfunding Toronto.  No tolls needed, gas taxes are already collected by the province.  Where are they going?

Output: Non-obscene


Input: Consider Input: Comment: ESPN with the imploding business plan. A network allegedly dedicated to reporting on the usually benign topic: sports. Yet, the network's double-standards and hypocrisy were laid bare. She should've been Terminated-for-Cause. The fact ESPN gave her the wink, wink is why ESPN is hemorrhaging tens of millions of dollars in annual losses.

Output: Non-obscene


Input: Consider Input: Comment: Denver did 'adapt' and look at the mess it is in. Traffic that kills your soul, a city where the average person can't afford to live.  Damned if you do damned if you don't


Output: Obscene