In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Comment: Japan and Germany.

I suppose you'd rather just leave Assad be to commit whatever atrocity he feels like.

Damned if they try to help, damned if they don't.
Obscene

Comment: You can't culturally appropriate fictional cultures because they don't exist. Your example misses the point.
Non-obscene

Comment: There is a larger problem here: twice in the 21st century, the American public has elected two grossly incompetent Presidents: Bush and now Trump. Bush was, basically, a decent guy who was in way over his head, was deeply ignorant, and was led astray by the people around him. Trump is also profoundly ignorant, but he is not a "decent guy;" he is a deeply disturbed and unfit individual. We can be thankful that, on many issues, he seems to be backing down or tempering his actions. But there is no guarantee that will continue. The next time Americans elect a President it could be someone who is much smarter, has a much stronger set of destructive principles and ideology, and who is, as a result, an even greater threat to the world. It's time to acknowledge that the USA is the most dangerous state in the world right now.

Non-obscene