We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Example Input: Sent1: We didn't ban all guns, just most of them, because our farmers need them and our police need them.
 Sent2: Biggest problem we have with guns is actually modified starting pistols rather than smuggled guns, our gangs not quite measure up to yours, despite what many of them would like to think ;)
Example Output: Not similar

Example Input: Sent1: ATF then obtains the sale records which every FFL dealer is required to maintain for every firearm and learns when the gun was received by the dealer and when and to whom the particular gun was sold.
 Sent2: To purchase a firearm in a commercial shop, one needs to have a Waffenerwerbsschein (weapon acquisition permit).
Example Output: Not similar

Example Input: Sent1: 1) Protection - The argument suggests that guns protect us from dangerous individuals.
 Sent2: What you've been doing isn't a debate about gun control, it's criticism of the Supreme Court for saying the Second Amendment protects an individual right to own a gun for legal purposes.
Example Output:
Not similar