In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: insult and non-insult. Insult is any lanugage or act that is disrespectful or scornfully abusive.

Ex Input:
Comment: man you are on delusional idiot of left wing bs to think our OIL is not worth being involved in when the worlds demand continues to increase! never mind your complete brain washed stupidity about china and green LOL

Ex Output:
Insult


Ex Input:
Comment: Good comments, Monica.
 
I imagine you'll agree that the discussion about who might be the first gay saint presupposes a fairly modern paradigm about sexual orientation. The norm throughout most of history has been for a somewhat flexible line. It's doubtful that Paul -- or most of the sacred authors, for that matter -- even thought in terms of  'straightness' or 'gayness,' but rather in terms of what they perceived as moral or immoral actions.

Regarding RC bishops, it seems that these days intellectual curiosity is not high on the list of qualifications. There are plenty of intellectually curious priests (well, some anyway), but they tend to get weeded out well before they rise to the level of the episcopacy, sad to say.

Ex Output:
Non-insult


Ex Input:
Comment: Having just finished reading White Trash by Nancy Isenberg, The book quotes Lyndon Johnson as saying: "If you can convince the lowest white man he's better than the best coloured man,he won't notice you are picking his pocket. Hell, give him somebody to look down on, and he'll empty his pockets for you." The US does not care much about equality. They voted in the nut bar because their knickers were in a twist that a black man had made it into the White House.

Ex Output:

Non-insult