Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
--------
Question: i would think that any legislator who kicks this can down the road would be kissing their chances for surviving this election cycle goodbye.  but what do i know.  we were stupid enough to elect these hacks.  we might still be dumb enough to give them another shot.  i consider myself a conservative independent, but i'll be damned if i'll vote for any incumbent republican candidate who isn't willing to stand up and deal with the problem this session.

Answer: No


Question: So if I say this is consistent with sharia law; you will take down my comment.
Why? Because you are afraid.

Answer: Yes


Question: And how does corporate welfare we are all paying for, in a global economy suit your careful sensibility? The narrow focus of one aspect of manipulation of so much that is interconnected, shows how you could move elsewhere, yet still manage to complain about indigenous land ownership in perpetuity.

They had all that before the European industrial revolution allowed them to steal with impunity. And treaty upon treaty was supposed to allow them to recover from that loss; yet the indigenous peoples were repeatedly put into a smaller holding cell & given less rations than previously.

You are on stolen property & yet would seek to stand 'your' ground there? ;)

Answer:
No