Categorize the comment on the basis of severe toxicity. If the comment is severely toxic output Yes, otherwise output No.

Q: This is great. Some old hippy writes the propaganda plan to kill Pebble yet his own agency is responsible for one of the worst environmental disasters in human history. Here's the link. 
EPA pollutes Colorado River
http://www.cnn.com/2015/08/09/us/colorado-epa-mine-river-spill/
Nobody went to jail, nobody lost their job, not one EPA person paid a fine or even laid off for a while. This clown North can go back to SE Asia and stay there. Made a living sucking off the government tit and then cuts and runs to travel the world with his lil kids. Right!  If this clown would have stuck around and represented his work product instead of running and hiding like a lil Wimp his kids would probably respect him at least.

A: Yes
****
Q: I agree that all of these are frightening aspects of Trump. However, some of them apply equally to Clinton. I've been sitting through a primary where Clinton and her surrogates have been belittling even those liberals who don't support her (calling them sexist, stupid, etc.) She also has a history of doing whatever it takes to get her way regardless of the cost to others (ACA, eagerness to use military force, etc.) And both Trump and Clinton are corporatists.

Trump scares me, yes, but Clinton does as well.

A: Yes
****
Q: Socialists have neither brains, heart, nor courage.  Socialists,  otherwise known as redistributionists,  depend on government raiders to take what belongs to one person through the power and intimidation of government to be redistributed to others according to what government deems is "fair".  Socialists are thieves disguised as do gooders creating dependent and incompetent masses.

A:
Yes
****