The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.

[Q]: Context: 'No I can't do that unfortunately./' 'Ok, so I could take 2 firewood, 1 food, and 1 water, the original deal, do you still want to do that one?' 'I would prefer the original deal'
Utterance: 'Ok, I am good with the original deal also. '
[A]: No


[Q]: Context: 'We can try to figure out a way to split the water and food in the fairest way 🙂. Firewood isn't an issue so it doesn't matter as much. I think to start something like splitting the food 2/1 and the water 1/2?' 'That might work. I can always boil it and I could use the extra food for the kids.' 'Ok so I propose 2 water for me, 1 for you. 2 food for you, 1 for me. Firewood would be, 2 for you, 1 for me? Please give me your opinion if you want to reverse any of that.'
Utterance: 'That would work, the extra firewood would offset the need to have water on hand when I can boil it.'
[A]: No


[Q]: Context: 'I can also understand your family situation. I'll give 1 package of water.🙂' 'That works for me.🙂 Are you able to share the food if I give you 1 firewood?' 'I think our dealing is going good. You take all the firewood.As I already said, I have some health issue.  Can you help me with the food?'
Utterance: 'Sounds good I will give you the 2 packages of food.🙂'
[A]:
No