In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

Example Input: Comment: Wait until you experience death yourself before you make comments. He should be in a 2x2 cell forever if not executed.
Example Output: Non-identity-attack

Example Input: Comment: I've been a tory voter since the 60's and I've just one thing to say. I'm finished with the bad-mouthing, negative bollocks coming out of the CPC. I'm going to have a terrible choice to make come 2019. The liberal free spending but ultimately positive agenda or the negative, vitriolic politicking of the CPC. I yearn for the days of Stanfield, Clark and even Mulroney. The change came when the reform party changed the conservatives for ever. Out went the caring, conciliatory conservatives and in came the nasty attack dogs of Manning and Harper. Maybe it's time for a fourth party in Canada. Bring back the Progressives and give us Red Tories a party to vote for.
Example Output: Non-identity-attack

Example Input: Comment: Corporations are people too for the purposes of campaigns. How about kicking out Democrats who took campaign contributions from corporations that have given campaign contributions to Republicans?  Corporations shouldn't be allowed to support Republicans and then be allowed to financially support candidates in the Democratic primaries.  The corporate campaign contributions carry more weight to shifting the politics of the party than Kent's endorsement of Stein by far.  And certainly, those corporations do more violence to the aloha spirit and bring more dishonor to the state than Kent ever could.  Sounds like neoliberalism has taken firm root here and is growing like a cancer on the aina and body politic.
Example Output:
Non-identity-attack