Craft one incorrect answer. In doing so, try to use words from the context as much as possible, or by using similar words used in the correct answer. DO NOT craft nonsensical or off-topic incorrect answers, such that the incorrect answers can be directly excluded without reasoning according to the context. Try to make your responses similar to the given correct answer. To this end, try to keep both the length and the style as similar as possible between the correct and the incorrect answer. To make your incorrect answers more difficult, try to incorporate words from context. To avoid being predictable or repetitive, try to add more variations and complexity.

[EX Q]: Context: Do you think that involves letting Detective Messer live when Detective Taylor does n't give him what he wants ? " At this , Gracie 's eyes were wide and worried , her hands starting to wring together slightly as Angell continued to lay things out for her . " If Hirsch kills him , and we ca n't find him ? That 's first degree murder , and not just that , he killed a cop . 
Question: What may be the reason for Gracie wringing her hands together ? 
Correct Answer: She is nervous .
[EX A]: She had cold hands .

[EX Q]: Context: The backdrop is of post - war Germany and all of its peoples ' homecoming tales , and later , the nation 's divided self reuniting . The book touches on evil , justice , ethics and morals and the place of each in both the psyche and the modern world . I related to the protagonist quite strongly ; his ultimate decision reflects my own approach to dealing with my father 's behaviour , and for many of the same reasons . My only criticism is that the female characters , with the exception of the protagonist 's mother , while believable and real , seemed a little two - dimensional , a little too straightforward in their complex world . 
Question: Why was the nation 's divided self reuniting ? 
Correct Answer: That is the way forward .
[EX A]: The book touches on evil .

[EX Q]: Context: A : Well , everything has a promoter , and , of course , I ' ve been a highly visible moonwalker . But the movie fit in very well with my approaching , supporting and stimulating the 40th anniversary of the moon landing . The idea is to present the American people with why we should be doing exploration in the future by reminding them of the benefits that we got in the past , and to reintroduce the people who flew in those mission . To me , this is more education than entertainment . 
Question: Who might be the narrator in this story ? 
Correct Answer: The narrator might be Buzz Aldrin or Neil Armstrong .
[EX A]:
The narrator might be Richard Nixon or JF Kennedy .