In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: threat and non-threat. Threat is a statement that someone will be hurt or harmed, especially if the person does not do something in particular.

[Q]: Comment: He is a murderer, child or not.  He deserves to die hinself
[A]: Threat


[Q]: Comment: I was defining the situation. The NFL is losing viewers and supporters and the fans are losing a once enjoyable Sunday afternoon and are being subject to political grandstanding. Nothing will change because the blacks believe the white people are the villains and they must change their ways. They also believe they is nothing they are doing that has exaggerated this issue, it is all whiteys fault. Don't believe me, ask them!
[A]: Non-threat


[Q]: Comment: You fail to address either any of Mr. Krugman's positions. You fail to address my assertion that supporting prior censorship is an attack on freedom of speech and a specific attack on the individual whose ideas you propose censoring. Instead you post "I'll assume the other statements in your post have the same credibility."  

What on earth are you talking about?
[A]:
Non-threat