The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.

Input: Consider Input: Context: 'Hello hood to see a fellow camper.  How are you doing today?🙂' 'Hey! I'm doing great, how are you? '
Utterance: 'Looking forward to doing some serious hiking with the family.  bad luck on the way here we flew in and the airline loss or bags with some of our supplies and sleeping bags.☹️'

Output: Yes


Input: Consider Input: Context: 'I can give you two of the packages if you're willing to give me all 3 of the firewood. I left mine out in the rain a couple of nights ago so its all ruined.' 'If I will give 2 firewood for you and I will take all the food package with 2 water.' 'I need all 3 firewood! But I'm willing to discuss food with you. I have a lot of that.'
Utterance: 'Wow. Thank you. Ok. Then I will give you all 3 firewood, however I need all food package with water.'

Output: No


Input: Consider Input: Context: 'Oh, that won't really work for me.  I was hoping to get extra food and water for this trip since I need water to take medication and would love the food to plan a special meal.  I'd like say, 2 food, 3 water and 1 firewood' 'I could give you 2 food, if I could have 3 firewood and 2 water' 'Hmm, how about I take 2 food and 2 water and you can have all the firewood?'
Utterance: 'This is fair, but I do not have any use for much firewood. I could give you 2 firewood, 2 water and 1 food'


Output: No