instruction:
In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.
question:
Comment: Trolls should stay under the bridge.
Old tactic; if you can't refute the message - attack the messenger
answer:
Non-obscene


question:
Comment: The authors of the  JJ report insist that homosexuality played no role in the abuse crisis, but their own data undermine this conclusion. For example, they plainly admit that “81% of the victims [between 1950 and 2002] were male,” and that 78% were post-pubescent.

So if the abusers weren’t pedophiles, and the victims were mostly adolescent males, wouldn’t that make the victimizers homosexuals?

What else could we possibly be talking about if not homosexuality?

Why can't you answer this question?
answer:
Non-obscene


question:
Comment: Oh for Pete sake give the guy his freaking boat back and a couple months to get it out. I think the port made their point. I doubt very much he will stick around very long.
answer:

Obscene