In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: threat and non-threat. Threat is a statement that someone will be hurt or harmed, especially if the person does not do something in particular.

Example Input: Comment: First, any Breitbart article should be deemed suspect. Second, the author clearly misunderstood what Francis was saying. He was not saying that there are no Muslim terrorists, he was saying that there is no such thing as "Muslim terrorism", any more than there is "Christian terrorism".
Example Output: Non-threat

Example Input: Comment: Tony - You are new to NCR or a reincarnation of a banned commentator.  Either way, it is just hubris to argue with a woman who is on the receiving end of the Church's misogyny.  Until you grow a uterus and breasts, I recommend that you listen with the ear of your heart to our sister's concerns.

You can wrap it around quote marks but when isn't misogyny "hateful"?  We aren't talking about biologically determined roles but social constructed exclusion based solely on gender.  Obviously, you know nothing about the LGBT community and your baseless claims that the T is delusional and the LGB is paraphilia is as ignorant as it is offensive.  

Are you missing the comment section of Crux?  There are many other news sites that would be more appropriate for your point-of-view.
Example Output: Non-threat

Example Input: Comment: Have a feeling that that Faux Noise co-host saying Repugnicans should apologize to Hillary Clinton yesterday was probably more than enough to kill Ailes.

Fox wasn't all that terrible.  The first four seasons of the Simpsons were good.
Example Output:
Threat