In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: threat and non-threat. Threat is a statement that someone will be hurt or harmed, especially if the person does not do something in particular.

[Q]: Comment: Question is...if the shooter wasn't a brown skinned non Arabic named individual, would this be classified as "TERROR"??? 

Nah...only killing a couple people then blowing yourself away doesn't invoke "TERROR" at all...
[A]: Threat


[Q]: Comment: I would be carrying more than a large knife if people were shooting at my home and animals, calling me a white nigger, threatening to shoot me, and showing up with a virtual lynch mob of ignorant people who are shouting and threatening to 'tape me up' and send me out of town. The leaders of Akiak have led their people to commit illegal actions before and what would stop them if they told these people to harm this man? I understand that kind of harassment is legal and accepted in Alaskan native villages apparently, but it's not right on a human or a Christian level ( which is apparently not their religion). Sooo he is  wearing a knife on his belt on a small farm in Alaska and that makes him a bad person? Hahaha. That's beautiful.
[A]: Threat


[Q]: Comment: The bigger problem Michael is the fall of higher academia, which you represent perfectly. The fact that you are paid to go around inciting hatred, resentment, and division is a true crime. You have an endless supply of venom to spit because the real world will never fit your utopian fantasy. 

We all have utopian fantasies and mine is a world without hate-peddling simpletons like you.
[A]:
Non-threat