Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.

[EX Q]: I'm tired of reading from various prominent state leaders, not the legislators, that we need "new revenue."  OK, Fran, what new revenue?  You've served in plenty of high caliber appointed position inside and outside of Alaska, surely you can do better than beat around the bush.  The only new revenue that's been kicked around in op-eds is taxes:  Tax the PFD, income tax, education head tax ranging from $100-$500 depending on one's income, additional fuel tax, marijuana tax, more cigarette tax, and a statewide sales tax.  No on new revenue taxes until the Legislature cuts $50 million from its own budget, and repeals SB21 tax credits.
[EX A]: No

[EX Q]: RR? Do you truely believe what you are saying. You tout the Bill of Rights and Contitution all over over sites, but you deny a persons right to choose for his own body. Believe me if you ever went through chemo or lived with debilitating pain you would do just about anything to be able to feel better. Morphine, Oxy, and Codiene are drugs that keep most so out of it you can't function. I have watched cancer patients and others use pot. Other than raiding the frig for munchies, they function better than many who are sober! Forget alcohol. It should be classified as a level 1 dangerous drug. That crap about pot leading to harder drugs? Well those trashy people who use hard drugs are those who would do it anyway regardless if pot wasn't available. You know the idiot huffers of spray cans. Remember the Pam stupido's!
[EX A]: Yes

[EX Q]: Again "Hunter - Killer" Jenkins takes all to task explaining to all of us why we are "wrong" about his "friends." Call off the attack Paul the war was over long, long ago. We just need to do some "mop up" operations.
[EX A]:
No