We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

[EX Q]: With remarkably few exceptions, neither the media nor public policy makers have required death penalty opponents to support their claims or to define their standards.
[EX A]: Valid

[EX Q]: Morally, I do not believe in eye for an eye, because it would leave the whole world blind.
[EX A]: Valid

[EX Q]: Most other first-world countries don't have the death penalty, but have lower rates of crime, just pointing that out.
[EX A]:
Valid