Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.

Input: Consider Input: Three quarters of the LAC received campaign donations from Mark Pfeffer or his employees during the timeframe that the LIO lease was 'negotiated'.  Is yours in this list?http://midnightsunak.com/2015/11/02/records-show-pfeffer-gave-heavily-to-lio-decision-makers/

To try to paint Pfeffer as some sort of victim here is utter BS.  To try to pretend that any of those corrupted legislators, who voted on this deal after receiving money from the owner, have one shred of ethics remaining is also BS.

Early voting starts October 24th.

Output: No


Input: Consider Input: In the same breath I'm sure you in no way want to pay an income tax or part of your PFD to build more prisons.

Output: No


Input: Consider Input: If you want to see our legislators spend less on state government, to shrink the size of government, start with the easiest item.  That $32.5 million glass tower LIO.  They simply don't care about our spending problem.  Actions speak louder than words.

If your legislator voted in favor of buying that building, it's time for them to go.


Output: No