Categorize the comment on the basis of toxicity. If the comment is toxic (harmful, malicious, derogatory, threat, insult, identity attck, etc.) output Yes, otherwise output No.

Ex Input:
You are highly entertaining and borderline batshit crazy. Dirty air, dirty water, brown black and red people showing proper deference to the white race: pretty much sums up your ideal world, doesn't it?

Ex Output:
Yes


Ex Input:
I'm sorry but how is the university responsible for this at all. These are adults by the law who are self organizing this trip and gojjing on it at their own risk with their own funds (or parents) and making their own choices. Every school in the west coast does it and there is a reason Shastas community isn't making a lager effort to stop it. It's not the universities job to play law in this, if Shastas community is up in arms about this then perhaps only renting out house boats to those 23 and up may be a solution to combat the influx of people on spring break (notice I say people as students and non students alike attend). I agree this is bull shit how trashed the place is but putting the blame on the U of O is bull shit as well. The people who did this, while they may be students, are independent adults by societies standards and are responsible for their own choices

Ex Output:
Yes


Ex Input:
Young sez: restrict the availability of information about environmental impact statements to individuals and entities, like tribes and state and local governments, who live in the "affected area." What kind of crap is that? Republican crap!

Ex Output:

Yes