We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

[EX Q]: Sent1: The death penalty can be viewed as legalized murder, which is ironic considering that such a punishment is only imposed because of the cruelty of the crime - murder.
 Sent2: I think the death penalty is an archaic and obsolete form of punishment, even for the crime of murder.
[EX A]: Not similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: I'm also against death penalty because no one except God has the right to take person's life.
 Sent2: Last time I checked, killing doesn't bring persons back to life, so the only reason for the death penalty seems to be revenge.
[EX A]: Not similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: No matter how well the justice system works, we will always risk convicting innocent people.
 Sent2: A perfect judiciary system would not sentence innocent people, and would alleviate all problems with the death penalty.
[EX A]:
Similar