We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Example Input: If it must be, then we shall find a way to improve these peoples habits, not kill them because they aren't 'like us'.
Example Output: Valid

Example Input: As long as we sentence people to a life in prison we are also GUARANTEED to sentence an innocent person.
Example Output: Valid

Example Input: People seem to be trying to evade the issue, there's one person, who says Durr raped and murdered Angel Vincent and no other evidence.
Example Output:
Invalid