In this task, you will be presented with a context from an academic paper and a question separated with a 
. You have to answer the question based on the context.

In this paper, we introduce automatic `drunk-texting prediction' as a computational task. Given a tweet, the goal is to automatically identify if it was written by a drunk user.  
 Question: Do the authors equate drunk tweeting with drunk texting? 
Yes

We perform a direct comparison of expert and crowd contributors, for 1000 term groups based on the number of total annotations(200 term groups with 2 total annotations, 200 term groups with 3 total annotations, and so on up to term groups with 6 total annotations).  Evaluators were given a summary of the annotations received for the term group in the form of:The term group "inequality inequity" received annotations as 50.0% sadness, 33.33% disgust, 16.67% anger. Then, they were asked to evaluate on a scale from 1 to 5, how valid these annotations were considered. 
 Question: How do they compare lexicons?
Human evaluators were asked to evaluate on a scale from 1 to 5 the validity of the lexicon annotations made by the experts and crowd contributors.

Inspired by BIBREF12, we integrate in this paper a boundary assembling step into the state-of-the-art LSTM model for Chinese word segmentation, and feed the output into a CRF model for NER, resulting in a 2% absolute improvement on the overall F1 score over current state-of-the-art methods. 
 Question: What state-of-the-art deep neural network is used?

LSTM model