In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

[Q]: Comment: No, we don't have to "agree to disagree." It's just something trite people like to say. (Note you didn't even agree but went on arguing your opinion with, of all things, an appeal to your ignorance.)

As for the appeal to cite "any person nationally," you haven't even cited anyone so bugger off already. (Note, nor would it matter as it's all just silly opinion anyway.)

I repeat, shake things up a bit and hire Kaepernick as the quarterback.
[A]: Non-identity-attack


[Q]: Comment: Shhhh!  You're ruining the mainstream media's narrative!
[A]: Non-identity-attack


[Q]: Comment: Staggering for sure.  But I've seen this with CIBC before.  At some point comes the crash and burn.
[A]:
Non-identity-attack