Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
--------
Question: https://www.muni.org/Departments/Fire/Wildfire/Documents/ANCHORAGE_WILDFIRE_May_2004_Program_Report.pdf. 

Here is a long winded study the city published. If you read this closely, you will see many notations in regards to the "Fuel" problem on the HillSide. It will also show how we are not truly prepared to address the situation.  Yes, there has been some correction, but nothing compared to what needs to be done. It's not, if it happens, it's when will it happen? Until we take major steps to reduce the fuel up there, it's a future killing field. I no longer have the numbers at my finger tips, but there was another study which identified just how much total fuel was up there. It compared it to "Powder Kegs".

Answer: Yes


Question: and the feverish hand-wringing continues. as if it's gonna change how peeople here have been growing, eating smoking, and transporting their pot for the flast 40 years WITHOUT ANY HELP from the state. In fact, in many case's the state's own stupidity has only aided the "criminals" we would have a tome filled with legends of yore, heralding our own successes against these bumbling sheriff of knottingham types.

Answer: Yes


Question: I couldn't be more pleased. Comments on many sites too often get overtaken by trolls. It's the first I've heard of Civil, but I like its intent and encourage other publications in town to consider comments as a platform for engagement rather than a troll-driven click driver intended to boost online ad rates.

Answer:
Yes