We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

Example Input: You obviously have no experienced with even holding a gun first hand, otherwise you wouldn't have to ask such a stupid question.
Example Output: Valid

Example Input: What you are doing is a not so subtle form of propaganda by endlessly repeating the fallacy of an inantimate object, a gun, being illegal in and by itself.
Example Output: Valid

Example Input: It's also silly to argue that the Second Amendment only protects arms in common use.
Example Output:
Valid