Given a document, generate a short title of the document. The title should convey the main idea/event/topic about which the document is being written. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

Input: Consider Input: Sen. Bob Corker (R-TN)  speaks with reporters after announcing  his  retirement at the conclusion of  his  term on Capitol Hill in Washington  U.S.  September 26  2017. REUTERS/Aaron P. Bernstein
WASHINGTON (Reuters)  - U.S. Senator Bob Corker   the influential Republican chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee  said on Tuesday he will not run for re-election  a blow to a party already struggling to balance divisions between mainstream and more populist wings.
An establishment Republican   Corker  has been criticized from the right  and a conservative activist had already announced a primary challenge. But he was expected to keep the seat  and had amassed a $7.5 million campaign war chest.
 Corker  has ruled out running for governor of Tennessee.
âI have no idea what Iâm going to do. No idea whatsoever â  Corker  said in an interview. But he said he was not leaving out of frustration over deep party divides that have often paralyzed Congress.
 Corker  announced  his  retirement on the day of the failure of the latest Republican effort to repeal former Democratic President Barack Obamaâs healthcare law.
âI am not going to be one of the people who leaves here badmouthing what is one of the greatest privileges of oneâs life â  Corker  said.
He said he realized he was ready to retire on Aug. 24 during a factory groundbreaking in Clarksville  Tennessee  and almost announced his decision at least twice before Tuesday.  Corker  said that he made his announcement now to allow a strong candidate time to enter the Senate race.
 Corker  is the first senator to announce  his  retirement ahead of the 2018 mid-term elections  when one-third of the 100-seat chamber will be up for grabs. Tennessee is a solidly Republican state and the party  which currently holds a 52-seat majority in the Senate  is favored to keep his seat.
In his official announcement   Corker  said that âafter much thought  consideration and family discussionâ over the past year  he and his wife Elizabeth âhave decided that I will leave the United States Senate when my term expires at the end of 2018.â
 Sen. Bob Corker (R-TN)  walks away after speaking with reporters after announcing  his  retirement at the conclusion of  his  term on Capitol Hill in Washington  U.S.  September 26  2017. REUTERS/Aaron P. Bernstein
CLASHES WITH  TRUMP
In August  after Trumpâs much-criticized reaction to violence at a white supremacist rally in Virginia   Corker  told reporters in  his  home state Tennessee that Trump had not been able to demonstrate the âstabilityâ or competence that  he  needed to be successful as president.
After the exchange  the two men had an hour-long meeting at the White House this month that  Corker  has described as a wide-ranging and friendly discussion.
 Corker  will remain chairman of the Foreign Relations Committee until he leaves in January 2019. He said he wanted the panel to address issues including Secretary of State Rex Tillersonâs State Department reorganization  food aid reform  and the fight against human trafficking and modern slavery.
 Corker  said the committee would address the international nuclear agreement with Iran  as Trump faces a mid-October deadline for deciding whether to certify that Tehran is complying with that pact. That decision could force Congress to decide whether to reimpose sanctions.  Corker  would not say whether Trump had decided to certify or not.

Output: Republican U.S. Senator Corker will not seek re


Input: Consider Input: Speaking to the media reports of a possible Special Counsel in the offing over  her  Uranium One deal to the leftist media outlet Mother Jones  the former first lady  former Secretary of State and former Democratic nominee for president said :
 Hillary Clinton  would have you believe prosecuting corruption and holding anyone accountable is something only tinpot dictatorships do.
âIf they send a signal that weâre going to be like some dictatorship  like some authoritarian regime  where political opponents are going to be unfairly  fraudulently investigated  that rips at the fabric of the contract we have  that we can trust our justice system â  Clinton  said. âIt will be incredibly demoralizing to people who have served at the Justice Department  under both Republicans and Democrats  because they know better. But it will also send a terrible signal to our country and the world that somehow we are giving up on the kind of values that we used to live by and we used to promote worldwide.â
 Hillary Clinton  has been getting away with corruption for so long  she  doesn't see  herself  as subject to the law at all. There was  her  illegal private server   her  destruction of government emails and tech machinery 'with hammers ' amounting to obstruction of justice  there was  her  collusion with Fusion GPS which took phony "opposition research" from the Russians for use in an investigation and leakfest against Donald Trump and this doesn't even cover the half of it. During  her  tenure as Secretary of State  there were classified documents mishandled (left on the dashboard of cars on overseas trips)  the Benghazi failure to protect American personnel overseas  the Benghazi talking points coverup  a missing $2 billion in financial mismanagement and more. Scroll further back and the corruption continues in the same pattern: Whitewater  the cattle futures cleanup  the missing billing records and "I don't recall." lt likely goes even further back than that with the NGOs and the Nixon investigation. Any wonder the late William Safire called her 'a congenital liar' and the number one reason voters rejected her according to a Soros group  was the public perception of her as untrustworthy?
I've got news for her: Banana republics  tinpot dictatorships  and authoritarian regimes do not prosecute big-dollar corruption among the politically connected. Going by pay-to-play rules is how they operate. That's how Mugabe in Africa and Chavistas in Venezuela and assorted characters in the Indonesia of the  Clinton  era operate. It's what makes them banana republics in the first place.
Far from the act of prosecuting corruption being a problem  as  Hillary Clinton  would have you believe  operating on pay-to-play principles and expecting to get away with it is what makes a place a tinpot regime.

Output: Hillary Clinton calls holding miscreants accountable banana


Input: Consider Input: NEW DELHI (AP) — Against the backdrop of a bitterly fought local election  India is witnessing the unusual spectacle of Prime Minister Narendra Modi locked in a bitter verbal duel with his predecessor and accusing the opposition of holding secret meetings with Pakistani officials to impact the vote.
In a written statement  Singh accused  Modi  of dealing in "falsehood and canards" because  he  feared "imminent defeat in Gujarat."
The western state of Gujarat is  Modi 's home turf. He ruled it  without any real opposition  for over a decade before he arrived at the national center stage. The election that is underway there is being called the closest fight that  Modi  and  his  Hindu nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party have faced in two decades.
Even though  Modi  no longer heads the state  the election has become a referendum of sorts on  his  popularity and that of  his  party.  He  has headlined the party's election campaign over the last month  addressing rallies across the state. Several top federal lawmakers and party functionaries have joined  him  to rally support for the party.
FILE - In this Wednesday  Dec. 13  2017  file photo   Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi   front  stands with  his  former counterpart Manmohan Singh  left  in one minute silence to pay homage to security officials who lost their lives in the 2001 attack on Indian parliament  in New Delhi  India. Against the backdrop of an increasingly personal and bitterly fought local election  India is witnessing the unusual spectacle of  Modi  locked in a bitter verbal duel with  his  predecessor  accusing the opposition of holding secret meetings with officials from archrival Pakistan to impact the polls. The unsubstantiated allegations have prompted a sharply worded response from Singh. (AP Photo/Manish Swarup  File)
"He has staked his own personal prestige on Gujarat " said political analyst Neerja Chowdhury. As someone removed from local politics for over three years  there was no need for  Modi  to make the campaign about  himself    he  said.
"It's become a personal election for  him . Now that it has  there is a lot more at stake " Chowdhury said.
Even by the rough and tumble standards of a chaotic and closely fought Indian election   Modi 's words were in sharp deviation from the campaigning style of former prime ministers.
"What is the reason to have such a secret meeting with the Pakistan high commissioner? And while elections are on in Gujarat  what is the reason for this type of secret meeting?"  Modi  said at an election rally.
At a separate rally   he  suggested that Pakistani officials were trying to ensure that a Muslim leader of the Congress party becomes the state's next leader.  He  offered no proof.
In an editorial Tuesday  The Indian Express newspaper said that  Modi 's "none-too-veiled innuendo" had "severely let down  his  constitutional commitment and office."
FILE - In this Nov. 27  2017  file photo   Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi 's supporters wear  his  masks during an election campaign rally addressed by  Modi  at Jasdan in Gujarat  India. Against the backdrop of an increasingly personal and bitterly fought local election  India is witnessing the unusual spectacle of  Modi  locked in a bitter verbal duel with  his  predecessor  accusing the opposition of holding secret meetings with officials from archrival Pakistan to impact the polls. The unsubstantiated allegations have prompted a sharply worded response from former Prime Minister Manmohan Singh. (AP Photo/Ajit Solanki  File)
In the three years since  Modi  and  his  Hindu nationalist party won a massive victory in national elections  rights groups have reported a spike in attacks on minority groups  especially Muslims. Most of the attacks have been linked to fringe Hindu hard-liners.  Modi  has largely kept silent  with many seeing  his  silence as tacit support.
 His  own oratory is powerful and scathing at election rallies  but as prime minister  he  has so far refrained from making controversial remarks  leaving those to junior party members.
"Whether  he  wins or loses in Gujarat   he  is spreading a poison from which Indian politics will find it hard to recover for quite some time " analyst and commentator Pratap Bhanu Mehta wrote in a newspaper column Wednesday.


Output: India's Modi duels with his predecessor amid local election