Given a document, an entity and its sentiment towards the entity, verify if it is the correct sentiment towards the entity. Answer should be yes or no. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

Ex Input:
Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Michele Pihera is Neutral . The 16-year-old victim told investigators that she had been drinking at a bar with friends on Sunday night  then one of her friends called an Uber for the girl. She was picked up by Jagne who later allegedly assaulted her before dropping her off at her destination. Gwinnett Police Cpl.  Michele Pihera  said in a statement  âOnce  she  was dropped off at the apartment complex  she  began banging on several of the homes in the neighborhood  and one of those residents called 911. One of those neighbors did notice that  her  pants were around  her  ankles.â
According to police  the girl  appeared to be extremely intoxicated  police are currently not aware of which bar  the girl  was drinking at but are still investigating as bar employees could face charges for serving a minor. âI think that  she âll make a full recovery physically. I can only imagine  emotionally   she âll have a little bit longer of a recovery â  Pihera  said.
Police stated that evidence that they received from Uber corroborate  the girl âs claims  âWe know that from the start location to the end location it should have taken a short amount of time  but based on the trip data it took even longer. Again  more corroboration to  her  story â  Pihera  said. Investigators are now looking into whether or not anyone else has been assaulted by Jagne and have requested any victims to contact them as soon as possible.
Commenting on the case  Uber said in a statement  âWhatâs reported here is horrifying beyond words. Our thoughts are with the rider and  her  family during this time. This driver has been permanently removed from the app.â

Ex Output:
yes


Ex Input:
Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Pope Francis Letter is Negative . Well  it’s now happened.  The great scandal of the modern Catholic Church  —  its  tolerance for clergy who abuse children  and  its  laxity when dealing with bishops who themselves tolerated or enabled priest-abusers — now touches directly on  the pope himself .
 It ’s worth laying out the timeline clearly. In 2015  Pope Francis appointed Juan Barros Madrid to the bishopric of Osorno  Chile. The appointment was met with local protests  among Catholics and non-Catholics who believed that Barros was implicated in the crimes of child sexual abuse committed by his friend Father Fernando Karadima  a prominent Chilean churchman who habitually kissed and fondled boys. In the days after the installation of Barros at Osono  Pope Francis told an archbishop that there was “no objective reason at all” to oppose the appointment. The Vatican’s own department governing these matters  the Congregation for Bishops  released a statement saying they had “carefully examined the prelate’s candidature and did not find objective reasons to preclude the appointment.”
In the months following the appointment   Pope Francis  became extremely dismissive of complaints. “Osorno suffers  yes  for silliness ”  the pope  said of the outrage in the media. “Think with your head  and do not be carried away by the noses of the leftists  who are the ones who put this thing together ” he added.
A few weeks ago   Pope Francis ’s visit to Chile was marked by protests  and  the pope  continued  his  extremely brusque dismissal. “The day I see proof against Bishop Barros  then I will talk ” the pontiff said. “There is not a single piece of evidence against  him . It is all slander. Is that clear?”  Francis  said that no victims had come forward to  him . It was apparently this statement that caused Cardinal Sean O’Malley of Boston to scramble down to Chile and meet with the pope. After O’Malley’s intervention  presumably  the pope issued a half-apology  but repeated that the accusations against Barros were “slander” before adding  “I’m convinced he’s innocent.”
And now the news drops. In the time between the pope’s appointment of Barros and his commentary about protesters being carried away by leftists  members of the Vatican’s own Commission for the Protection of Minors gathered to discuss the appointment. They had a representative hand-deliver a letter to Pope Francis  from Carlos Cruz. The letter alleged  in lurid detail  that Barros had personally witnessed the abuse of Cruz at Karadima’s hands. Members of the commission photographed the hand-off of the letter to  the pope   to reassure Cruz that they were doing everything possible to make his cry for justice heard.
The facts as we know them leave us with a few interpretations. 1)  Pope Francis  simply never read the letter  ignoring this extraordinary intervention by the Vatican’s own commission on a matter of public controversy for  his  pontificate. 2)  Francis  read the letter but forgot about it  reverting to  his  original understanding of the case. 3)  Francis  read the letter  but stuck to  his  decision for Barros  committing unintentional or intentional deceptions about the state of  his  knowledge of the accusations. 4)  He  read the letter  but either doubted the accusations in it  or at least found them so unimpressive that  he  did not decide to follow up on them.
The first explanation would mean that  Francis  was culpably ignorant. The second that  he  may lack the mental or moral faculties to competently govern the Catholic Church. The third that  he  is too stubborn or vain to change course in the face of evidence. And the last that  he  has little trust or faith in the Commission on the Protection of Minors to pass on credible counsel to  him . Perhaps more reporting or disclosure will change our understanding  but none of these are satisfactory.

Ex Output:
no


Ex Input:
Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Donald Trump Jr. is Positive . It profits a man nothing to give his soul for the whole world... but for  Trump ’s base?
If Sir Thomas More were alive today  that’s what he might say about congressional Republicans who gave their political souls in exchange for  Trump ’s support because they thought they needed it to be reelected. They have been held hostage by  Trump ’s popularity with  his  base and  his  grip on the swing vote. But after last week  that grip looks a lot looser.
It remains to be seen whether they have learned it  but the lesson for Republicans from their losses in Virginia  New Jersey and across the country should be clear: they don’t need to placate  Trump  to keep their seats. Senators Jeff Flake and Bob Corker decided not to run for another term because they weren’t willing to cozy up to  the president  and thought they couldn’t win without doing so. Perhaps they’ll reconsider that now.
 Trump’s  coattails were never long to begin with  and are now fraying. The 2016 election was decided by just 0.09 percent of all votes cast. A total of 107 000 votes gave Trump Michigan  Wisconsin and Pennsylvania and the presidency.  He  won in those states and Florida  by less than 2 percent.
 Trump  still has strong support from  his  base  with the latest CNN poll showing 85 percent of Republicans approve of  him . In stark contrast  only 20 percent approved of Republican congressional leaders as of late September.  Trump ’s blaming them for failure to pass legislation apparently worked  which may help explain why they have been so deferential to such a dysfunctional president.
They’ve even gone so far as to introduce a resolution asking special counsel Robert Mueller to recuse himself from investigating whether  Trump ’s campaign colluded with Russia. This is pure political kowtowing  flying in the face of the Manafort and Gates indictments  the Papadopoulos plea and the targeting of Flynn.
The question is  will congressional Republicans continue to appease  Trump  given the 2017 election results? Or will more of them stand up to  him ?
Will they continue to tolerate  Trump’s  unprecedented conflicts of interest?  He  holds stakes in roughly 500 international businesses  many in countries where  he  must negotiate trade and other agreements. The conflicts are so serious that the Office of Government Ethics director couldn’t abide them and resigned  while Republicans just stood pat.
Will they challenge  Trump’s  cascade of lies  such as “I have nothing to do with Russia…no person that I deal with does”? What about Paul Manafort  Donald Trump Jr.  Jared Kushner  Carter Page  Michael Flynn  Roger Stone  Rick Gates  and George Papadopoulos and Betsy Devos’ brother  Erik Prince  the billionaire founder of Blackwater?
Will they finally admit that  Trump ’s poor character is the core problem  and that  as the Economist opined  “he does not have the character to change”? Republicans  on the other hand  have changed since  Trump  was elected. They’ve retreated from core positions on trade and security.
Republicans championed the benefits of free trade for decades. NAFTA was negotiated by Republican president George H.W. Bush and passed with mostly Republican votes. Republicans also supported the Trans-Pacific Partnership trade agreement  which Marco Rubio wrote would “further our strategic goals in Asia and increase prosperity at home ” and Pat Toomey applauded TPP as a boon to economic growth and job creation. Yet  Trump ’s tirades against free trade—probably the biggest issue that won  him  the presidency—cowed many congressional Republicans into doing nothing as  Trump  abandoned the TPP.
They acquiesced as  Trump  weakened America’s ability to communicate  lead and influence on the world stage.  He  exited the Paris climate accord.  He  cut the State Department’s staff.  He  confused NATO members as to America’s commitment to defend its European allies. Now our allies in Southeast Asia worry that Trump  desperate for a win  will make a deal with China that emboldens it to bully its neighbors  further endangering our relationships in the region.
While the 2017 election results are heartening for Democrats  they should also be heartening in a different way for Republicans who have been stuck in  Trump ’s political chokehold. They should feel somewhat freer to speak honestly about their president and work to repair the damage he has caused. Pandering to  Trump  won’t get them reelected  and even if  it  did   it  still wouldn’t be worth the divisiveness  dysfunction and the loss of influence and respect America has suffered.

Ex Output:

no