Given a document, an entity and its sentiment towards the entity, verify if it is the correct sentiment towards the entity. Answer should be yes or no. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

Ex Input:
Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Pope Francis Letter is Negative . Well  it’s now happened.  The great scandal of the modern Catholic Church  —  its  tolerance for clergy who abuse children  and  its  laxity when dealing with bishops who themselves tolerated or enabled priest-abusers — now touches directly on  the pope himself .
 It ’s worth laying out the timeline clearly. In 2015  Pope Francis appointed Juan Barros Madrid to the bishopric of Osorno  Chile. The appointment was met with local protests  among Catholics and non-Catholics who believed that Barros was implicated in the crimes of child sexual abuse committed by his friend Father Fernando Karadima  a prominent Chilean churchman who habitually kissed and fondled boys. In the days after the installation of Barros at Osono  Pope Francis told an archbishop that there was “no objective reason at all” to oppose the appointment. The Vatican’s own department governing these matters  the Congregation for Bishops  released a statement saying they had “carefully examined the prelate’s candidature and did not find objective reasons to preclude the appointment.”
In the months following the appointment   Pope Francis  became extremely dismissive of complaints. “Osorno suffers  yes  for silliness ”  the pope  said of the outrage in the media. “Think with your head  and do not be carried away by the noses of the leftists  who are the ones who put this thing together ” he added.
A few weeks ago   Pope Francis ’s visit to Chile was marked by protests  and  the pope  continued  his  extremely brusque dismissal. “The day I see proof against Bishop Barros  then I will talk ” the pontiff said. “There is not a single piece of evidence against  him . It is all slander. Is that clear?”  Francis  said that no victims had come forward to  him . It was apparently this statement that caused Cardinal Sean O’Malley of Boston to scramble down to Chile and meet with the pope. After O’Malley’s intervention  presumably  the pope issued a half-apology  but repeated that the accusations against Barros were “slander” before adding  “I’m convinced he’s innocent.”
And now the news drops. In the time between the pope’s appointment of Barros and his commentary about protesters being carried away by leftists  members of the Vatican’s own Commission for the Protection of Minors gathered to discuss the appointment. They had a representative hand-deliver a letter to Pope Francis  from Carlos Cruz. The letter alleged  in lurid detail  that Barros had personally witnessed the abuse of Cruz at Karadima’s hands. Members of the commission photographed the hand-off of the letter to  the pope   to reassure Cruz that they were doing everything possible to make his cry for justice heard.
The facts as we know them leave us with a few interpretations. 1)  Pope Francis  simply never read the letter  ignoring this extraordinary intervention by the Vatican’s own commission on a matter of public controversy for  his  pontificate. 2)  Francis  read the letter but forgot about it  reverting to  his  original understanding of the case. 3)  Francis  read the letter  but stuck to  his  decision for Barros  committing unintentional or intentional deceptions about the state of  his  knowledge of the accusations. 4)  He  read the letter  but either doubted the accusations in it  or at least found them so unimpressive that  he  did not decide to follow up on them.
The first explanation would mean that  Francis  was culpably ignorant. The second that  he  may lack the mental or moral faculties to competently govern the Catholic Church. The third that  he  is too stubborn or vain to change course in the face of evidence. And the last that  he  has little trust or faith in the Commission on the Protection of Minors to pass on credible counsel to  him . Perhaps more reporting or disclosure will change our understanding  but none of these are satisfactory.

Ex Output:
no


Ex Input:
Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Al Sharpton is Positive . Wednesday on MSNBC’s “Morning Joe ”  network weekend host Al Sharpton  said President Donald Trump was “a symbol of Northern bigotry.”
 Sharpton  said  “ He  never left the Queens way   he  and  his  father were sued for racial discrimination for who they would rent apartments to. So when you read in The New York Times   him  being quoted by two sources saying all Haitians have AIDS  Nigerians won’t go home to their huts if we let them in the country  it speaks of a man that we in New York knew at various times. Now   he  and the White House has denied it  but it’s certainly not out of the character of what  he  has said and done.  He  led the fight that wanted to [give the] death penalty for five guys in Central Park that did this egregious despicable act of rape. They ended up not doing it. Many of us said it was questionable.  He  still said give them the death penalty. That’s who  he  is.”
 He  continued  “I think a lot of Americans look at Civil Rights and race relations in the South in the ’60s and miss New York in the ’80s where you had many  many incidents.”
 He  added  “They get away with it because don’t want to talk about up North kind of problems and Trump symbolizes it. Trump is as much a symbol of Northern bigotry as you have others that were Southern.”

Ex Output:
yes


Ex Input:
Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Roger Goodell is Positive . An anonymous Twitter account that routinely criticized media coverage of NFL commissioner Roger Goodell  was being run by  Goodell's wife   according to Andrew Beaton of the Wall Street Journal.
 The @forargument account  which was deleted after the Wall Street Journal began investigating  published under the name "Jones smith ."
According to Beaton   the account  had no followers and no profile picture. However  after the Wall Street Journal asked Jane Skinner Goodell  the commissioner's wife  about the account  she admitted to being the owner in a written statement.
 The account  was said to have specifically targeted media members who were critical of the commissioner.
In one example provided by the Wall Street Journal   the account  replied to a tweet from Pro Football Talk saying the commissioner needs to solve the national anthem issue in the NFL.
In another example  Jason Gay of the Wall Street Journal made a joke about a photo that showed Roger Goodell posing with New England Patriots fans.
"Why is everyone so immature? (including you?) "  the account  wrote. "Let's celebrate the new season."
You can see more examples of tweets from  the account  at the Wall Street Journal.

Ex Output:

yes