Categorize the comment on the basis of severe toxicity. If the comment is severely toxic output Yes, otherwise output No.

Example Input: Spot on.  The original design was well north of 20 mil, even then they were cheap Charlie plans.  And they kept cutting down from there.  Kill this dog.
Example Output: Yes

Example Input: Give  that officer a damn medal and a full expense vacation for him and his family. That is what you call a hero!
Example Output: Yes

Example Input: The University owes the listeners of KWAX an explanation and an apology.  I cannot imagine KRVM or KLCC doing this - they are very transparent in this community. Despite their "ownership", the University of Oregon is acting like a bully in this case.  If you asked any of the listeners of KWAX if they ever expected this when they were contributing funds to support their "non-profit, listener supported" station, I'll bet the answer would be a resounding "no". Perhaps that is the UO plan - alienate the listeners. Even their responses to the reporter's questions were not transparent. I guess stations are no longer licensed to organizations as "public trustees." Those days are over.
Example Output:
No