Categorize the comment on the basis of severe toxicity. If the comment is severely toxic output Yes, otherwise output No.

[EX Q]: That was tried, Zobels killed that with a lawsuit in the early 80's
[EX A]: No

[EX Q]: BJ, it's funny but you and I never say that the Koch Bros. don't understand their own interests.  It's always the less empowered groups that are lectured re: their own interests.  You can dance around your problem- that the majority of Portlanders reject New Urbanist policies- but it still exists.   

The majority of Portlanders like SFH, hence Novick's abysmal approval ratings.

I know that you are not anti-democratic, so the lack of democratic support for increased density must bother you.  Fact is, New Urbansim is co-opted by those who stand to make money off greenwashing & real estate.  It can and will be rejected at the polls.
[EX A]: No

[EX Q]: Fascism? There is no such thing as fascism, it doesn't exist. The real problem is those damned orphans and unwed mothers, screw em!
[EX A]:
Yes