instruction:
In this task, you will be presented with a context from an academic paper and you have to write an answerable question based on the context. Your questions can be extractive, abstractive, or yes-no questions.
question:
oss analysis. To conduct a more thorough evaluation, we further investigate model behaviours in terms of both reconstruc
answer:
How do they evaluate generated text quality?


question:
In the first scenario we equip the decoder with an additional morphology table including target-side affixes. We place an attention module on top of the table which is controlled by the decoder. At each step, as the decoder samples a character, it searches the table to find the most relevant information which can enrich its state. Signals sent from the table can be interpreted as additional constraints. In the second scenario we share the decoder between two output channels. The first one samples the target character and the other one predicts the morphological annotation of the character. This multi-tasking approach forces the decoder to send morphology-aware information to the final layer which results in better predictions. In the third scenario we combine these two models. 
answer:
How are the auxiliary signals from the morphology table incorporated in the decoder?


question:
We observe $R^2$ correlation coefficients between 0.11 and 0.22 for the input and output length ratios and between 0.81 and 0.88 for the compound divergence. 
answer:

How strong is negative correlation between compound divergence and accuracy in performed experiment?