In this task, you will be presented with a context from an academic paper and a question separated with a 
. You have to answer the question based on the context.

Q: This paper used the real-time method to randomly collect 10% of publicly available English tweets using several pre-defined DDEO-related queries (Table TABREF6 ) within a specific time frame.  
 Question: Do they evaluate only on English data?

A: Yes
****
Q: The word intrusion test is expensive to apply since it requires manual evaluations by human observers separately for each embedding dimension. Furthermore, the word intrusion test does not quantify the interpretability levels of the embedding dimensions, instead it yields a binary decision as to whether a dimension is interpretable or not. However, using continuous values is more adequate than making binary evaluations since interpretability levels may vary gradually across dimensions. 
 Question: What advantages does their proposed method of quantifying interpretability have over the human-in-the-loop evaluation they compare to?

A: it is less expensive and quantifies interpretability using continuous values rather than binary evaluations
****
Q: It was collected using crowdsourcing BIBREF4. The data collection was done using an Android application. 
 Question: what is the source of the data?

A:
Android application
****