Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.

If you have no integrity with the publicly stated beliefs of your religious denomination, that's between you and God. You are a private citizen, believe as you wish. 

But, your fellow Conservative Baptist Imago Dei church-member, Jules Bailey, has put the integrity of his beliefs (or, more accurately, lack of integrity, if I'm following his waffling correctly), up for public scrutiny. 

People who choose to become paid public figures, must expect to be scrutinized as such. And, it's a bit naïve for an Evangelical Christian to run for public office, in Portland, and not expect to be held accountable for the history of his chosen religion, particularly the past 30 years here in Portland (OCA, Oregon Family Council, etc.)
No

If the readers visiting this website want, they can look at the bottom of the article. WW has had to redact a claim they made that said Fred was "arrested." That is a false statement and WW had to admit it was an error. I wonder what else has been exaggerated in this hatchet job, racist attack on my good friend Fred Stewart. I defended my friend and in the comments section a person accused me of being his "mistress." Because why else would I defend him, right? THAT is the kind of blatant racism that exists in this city. I am a happily married women, my husband is Don DuPay. But I am also Fred's friend and I will defend him. He did not deserve this racist attack, and it is this kind of crap yellow journalism that WW has recently become well-known for. WW is currently an irrelevant Rag of a gossip magazine that no one really cares about anymore. The sad truth, I'm afraid.
Yes

You might want to listen to the speech on line.. Hillary Clinton spent only some of the time mocking her opponent.

Yes