In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Q: Comment: NATO can only postulate when it comes to non-existent "threat" from Russia. They don't want to do anything to fight the real threat of terrorism. Hey, France, how about cleaning up the mess you made in Libya?

A: Non-sexual-explicit
****
Q: Comment: Its funny watching the left twist themselves into knots defending religious views that literally oppress women.

This is why the left cannot be taken seriously on almost any matter. The same hypocrites who ranted and raved about Donald Trump were silent about Harvey Weinstein. They have marches and wear ribbons and talk about women’s rights and then say we have no right to step in when a religion oppresses women on what they can wear or do. 

Meanwhile if a Christian says women shouldn’t be allowed to have an abortion they go ape**** protest and riot saying and I quote “no one should be able to tell a woman what to do with her body”. How the F is this any different?

The selective and hypocritical morality of the left should be ignored as it is nonsensical and illogical. The ban should stand, otherwise what the law is saying is all religions are equal, except for islam which will get an exception every time. Thus the beginning of sharia law.

A: Non-sexual-explicit
****
Q: Comment: Republicans have been delegitimizing government for decades.  They've also been urging followers to stockpile weapons and ammo in order to resist the deligitimized government, using the exacts words I quoted above.  This strategy that they've used to rile up voters and win elections has now bitten them in the ass.  I'm not revelling, I'm pointing out that team red should check its irresponsible rhetoric.

A:
Sexual-explicit
****