We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

[Q]: The illusion that the English government had protected its citizens by disarming them seemed credible because few realized the country had an astonishingly low level of armed crime even before guns were restricted.
[A]: Valid


[Q]: We are law professors and historians who have a deep interest in the Second Amendment and its implications for the regulation of guns and of gun ownership.
[A]: Valid


[Q]: Their only success has been violating the Constitution and killing women and children or just burning them to death and shooting nursing mothers.
[A]:
Valid