In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Input: Consider Input: Comment: That both groups might or might not have committed violent acts is beside the point, the point being that what the white supremacist group stands for is not acceptable to decent people. Are you saying that emphasizing that black lives matter is unacceptable? Indeed you do, as you are a racist since way back.

Output: Non-sexual-explicit


Input: Consider Input: Comment: It's a couch.  It, and this story, and any and all hullaballoo is ridiculous and a perfect example of the MSM making mountains out of molehills to fit a political agenda.  

And besides, as many people have pointed out,  numerous POTUSs of the past (including Great Saint Obama himself) would commonly put their feet on the Resolute Desk.  

If Conway is showing a lack of respect or decorum for putting her feet on some random purchased couch that is barely a couple years old, then what does that say about Presidents who put their feet on a unique piece of American history?  I mean... that LBJ was sure a disrespectful POS, eh?  

Or is that just the narrative when it's a politico from a party you dislike?  Biased garbage.

Output: Non-sexual-explicit


Input: Consider Input: Comment: LOL sex with your underlings is now an "affair" instead of "sexual harassment"... if you are on the left. Wow.


Output: Sexual-explicit