We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

[Q]: Guns don't kill people, people kill people: absolutely true, but guns allow people to kill people with greater efficiency, which is not necessarily a good thing outside of the battlefield.
[A]: Valid


[Q]: Another point that isn't taken in consideration in the stats that I've seen is that guns are used in self-defense but it still goes down as "gun violence."
[A]: Valid


[Q]: Sly "Rambo" Stallone called for house-to-house confiscation of firearms in the U.S. Arnold "Terminator" Schwarzenegger publicly advocates every measure promoted by "gun control" groups while still saying that he believes in the Second Amendment.
[A]:
Valid