In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.
--------
Question: Comment: The senate fiscal plan here is to rob us, the ones who elected the  corrupt bastards club. Get rid of them & their ridiculous per diem.

Answer: Non-sexual-explicit


Question: Comment: I totally agree.  Why would anyone want to make any investment in this country with a very aggressive anti business government.  One look at Mr Morneau's tax suggestions on small/large/any business and you would have to give your head a shake.  The CEO of Amazon is not that foolish.

Answer: Non-sexual-explicit


Question: Comment: If you go to a music festival and drunkenly dance around in a fake "Indian headdress" or something like that, I get it -- it's a fool of a thing to do.  But shouldn't artists try to explore other cultures?  Don't we all become richer for it?  Should white kids not play jazz or blues?  There's a world of difference between dumb, thoughtless appropriation and images like Chief Wahoo and genuine, open-minded attempts to build bridges. I think Northrop Frye said something about art allowing us to explore other possible lives, and that doing so made us more tolerant and educated.  Apparently, Frye is just another evil "settler".  Maybe his books should be banned.

Answer:
Non-sexual-explicit