In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence can be inferred from the statement. Incorrect choices change the meaning in important ways or have details that are not mentioned in the statement. Indicate your answer as 1,2, or 3 corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.

Statement: According to the Departments, this rulemaking action does not impose unfunded mandates under the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995. Choices:  1. This action doesn't include an unfunded mandate. 2. Everyone is clear that this action is absolutely a mandate without proper funding. 3. the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 was passed in response to a budget crisis.
1

Statement: Participants raised questions about whether the SEC should reconsider the amount and targeting of its civil sanctions and more frequently use other types of remedies, such as criminal sanctions, to hold people accountable for wrongdoing. Choices:  1. Participants believe candles will be a great remedy for criminals. 2. Participants asked questions about different ways to hold criminals accountable for wrongdoing.  3. Participants asked many questions about the death penalty. 
2

Statement: I did math in my head. Choices:  1. I calculated it mentally. 2. I calculated it with my computer. 3. I calculated it mentally and then wrote it down.

1