We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

Could you legally produce weapons of mass destruction in your own back yard "without asking" for permission?
Valid

Gun ownership is a recognized, constitutionally protected right, and it's not dependent on fulfilling some duty to the city, state or federal government.
Valid

Obviously gun control is doing nothing to make California any safer, otherwise these numbers wouldn't be able to take place in such an alarmingly easy manner.

Valid