In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.
--------
Question: Comment: Come on Darin.  Did you really think you could run for an elected position and your past would never come up?  I could see past discretions like theft when you were a teenager/young man but masturbating in public when you were 29 years old as part of your 3rd conviction for public indecency?  Your past is a reflection of your character and your multiple thefts and public masturbation convictions make it very clear to me that you are not qualified for the position you sought after.

Answer: Sexual-explicit


Question: Comment: This topic must be expanded beyond "clergy sex abuse" to abuse of all kinds by clergy. There are priests who engage in patterns of verbal and emotional abuse which are just as damaging to the victims, and if the victims report the treatment, they are ridiculed, intimidated and manipulated to keep silent by those in authority over these abusers, who go merrily on their way, thinking, "As long as I'm not caught in bed with a woman, or a man, or looking at porn on a computer, nothing will happen." They behave like spoiled children, and those in authority enable and protect them.

Answer: Sexual-explicit


Question: Comment: Anyone who really knows "locker-room banter" will tell you that an old man who talks about grabbing women by the vagina has no character. But this man is a star. Insulated by money and power and protected by the cult of celebrity, he gets away with it.

Answer:
Sexual-explicit