We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Q: There is no way of proving the level of deterrent that any given action is worth.

A: Valid
****
Q: That could be considered Cruel and Unusual Punishment, it could mess with the persons mind.

A: Valid
****
Q: We could work at making it cheaper, and not going with this 'non cruel punishment' thing... (Hangings are cheap and they work), plus the prison sentences are way too long for those that get the death penalty.

A:
Valid
****