Categorize the comment on the basis of toxicity. If the comment is toxic (harmful, malicious, derogatory, threat, insult, identity attck, etc.) output Yes, otherwise output No.

Example Input: Wonder if Duncan was part of the Adak fisheries shakedown with his buddies Trevor and Ben ?
Example Output: No

Example Input: This is exactly how things get ruined for everyone.  Ever wonder why you can't go hang out in nature at night, even though you don't want to start a fire or leave trash behind?  It's because horrible little brats like this came before you and made such a mess that now everything is off limits, has to be routinely patrolled, and ends up becoming private property because it simply costs the city or state too damn much to keep cleaning up after these types of people.  They spoil it for everyone else who simply wants to enjoy nature and leave only footprints in their wake.
Example Output: Yes

Example Input: Larry, your historical research is lacking on this. Study the Republican administrations of the 1920s, for example -- as well as earlier -- and you'll find no (or very little) support for your assertions that Republicans believed that government needs to be large enough to ensure every citizen has a decent standard of living. They had other reasons for favoring a strong central government, but they had very little (if any) concern for the livelihoods of ordinary citizens. William Leuchtenberg's new (huge!) volume titled The American Presidency: From Teddy Roosevelt to Bill Clinton will give you a good overview, if you're interested. You're right that the Democrats changed in the 1930s, but they weren't switching places with Republicans (not at that point, that happened much later).
Example Output:
No