We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Sent1: I like guns as much as the normal person does but if guns are abused by people, we need restictions.
 Sent2: I like how anti gun people say we need to protect everyone from the rare gun events by banning guns, but when someone suggests banning the more frequent hammer and club attacks, they can justify those deaths.
Not similar

Sent1: Any further laws on the right to keep and bear arms by State, municipal or any other government is out the window.
 Sent2: Every person has a right to keep and bear arms for the defense of himself and the state.
Not similar

Sent1: The second amendment says MILITIAS have the right to carry guns, not private citizens, and that is why the militias are there to protects us and are composed of....private citizens.
 Sent2: 1) Protection - The argument suggests that guns protect us from dangerous individuals.

Not similar