In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

[EX Q]: Comment: miloscia, you're in the wrong. you didnt have your words twisted. you pandered to your base and got called out for spewing nonsense. advice: if you need this sort of space to not sound crazy, stay off social media.

but youre right about 1 thing: "mr. federal way" is the opposite of journalism. he stains the mirrors credibility. whoever is behind him has no integrity, no ethics, and no spine. if its someone on the mirror payroll then i hope theyre blacklisted from other news jobs.
[EX A]: Non-identity-attack

[EX Q]: Comment: "Except in the narrowest circumstances, no one should be forced to choose between living out his or her faith and complying with the law," Sessions wrote. 

So, if my religion tells me to beat my wife, drive drunk and discriminate against gay people, I should be allowed to do that regardless of the law?
[EX A]: Identity-attack

[EX Q]: Comment: I do not pretend to understand the detailed conflict between the Springs and Pueblo.  I appreciate your post that describes a long running problem.  What I do understand is that the EPA is broken and untrustworthy.  It has never had as much money as it receives presently.  What it lacks is accountability (no one was sanctioned or fired for the Gold King Mine fiasco) and competent leadership.  Scott Pruitt is taking over an entrenched bureaucracy of political hacks.  The EPA may be right on this issue, but I don't trust them.
[EX A]:
Non-identity-attack