instruction:
In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: threat and non-threat. Threat is a statement that someone will be hurt or harmed, especially if the person does not do something in particular.
question:
Comment: Wait a minute: Colter is "smart"? I thought Trump only likes "the poorly educated?" Why would some educated like Trump?
answer:
Non-threat


question:
Comment: Yay for the Brits!  But...does this mean bishops, school boards and administrators will not demand wretched contracts for teachers and other staff that are carefully worded to exclude LGBT teachers, such as are in effect in the US?  If yes, double-yay for the Brits; if not, I see yet another layer of hypocrisy.
answer:
Non-threat


question:
Comment: What in the world are you blabbering about?  In all of my posts, I did not mention one word about religion, nor imply any thing even close to it.  You libs are all the same and kneejerk revert to spouting the same idiotic weak rhetorical baffelgab..."enforced uniformity of religion and Christian sharia law."  Bla, bla, bla. LMAO. Who gives a good crap whether you do or do not practice a religion. Get a grip dude.
answer:

Non-threat