Categorize the comment on the basis of toxicity. If the comment is toxic (harmful, malicious, derogatory, threat, insult, identity attck, etc.) output Yes, otherwise output No.

Ex Input:
Ed, I see you're convinced. I'm not because I can do math.

1.5% income tax represents $36 a month from my paycheck. That's 6 fewer meals with meat for my family, a tank of gasoline, a month's membership at the rock climbing club my son loves. Or about 4 hours extra work for me to offset the lost income and the taxes associated with working those extra hours.

You see, for the average person, that money comes out of their paycheck FIRST and they don't get it back (if they get it back at all) until May. Our bills come in 52 weeks out of the year, so for 51 weeks out of the year, we'd have to do something to offset that lost income. I'm sure there are people in Alaska who get paid well enough that $40 a month is no big deal to them, but I'm also equally sure that many Alaskans are in the same boat I am. That money represents a line item in our budget that either must be funded or not, but will be felt.

And that's if the tax is only 1.5%. I've heard 6%, 15%, and 30% on offer.

Ex Output:
No


Ex Input:
It was a tongue in cheek remark, Frederick Minshall. Thus ending the sentence with .......

Someone had chided Shannyn's use of 'ammosexual' as being name calling, and they quit reading her article at that point, because of it.

Ex Output:
No


Ex Input:
calling me a racist is as ignorant as it gets. your first clue you are incapable of posting anything remotely intelligent is the fact you failed to back your ridiculous charge with actual facts.

Ex Output:

Yes