In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Example Input: Comment: All the 'legal' and philosophical arguing going on related to this article is nauseating. Everyone step back for a moment and think - the fact that the current legal system requires "proof beyond doubt" that a stranger raped someone who's  extremely intoxicated IS the problem. The victim was intoxicated and had hired a taxi to be taken home. The victim ended up naked and the taxi driver had sex with her. Evidence showed that. It was plain wrong. NO WOMEN CONSENTS TO SEX WITH A RANDOM STRANGERS. (outside sex trafficking-don't go there) Our criminal justice system is seriously flawed. Many sick, depraved people are out on the street, and dealing with our children, our seniors, and our family members because of it. Let's look at how the system is messing up in the NUMEROUS case like this one...Arguing the woman's drunkenness does not change the fact-some pervert who could drive your daughter to a back alley one day too had sex with this women when he should not have
Example Output: Sexual-explicit

Example Input: Comment: Attention Oregonians:  Senator Ron Wyden,  a UofO law school grad,  failed the Oregon bar exam three times,  and has never been able to practice before the bar.  So when he pontificates  (or would that be rabbinicalates?)  that Trump Jr. talked to the Russian lawyer soliciting buyers for information she evidently did not have,  he was NOT colluding with anyone about anything.  A shill in a skirt did a fan dance with some legal papers,  conned her way to an interview,  was listened to until it was determined that she was barking up the wrong tree about the wrong stuff, and was politely excused.  

Now,  was there dirt on Hillary Clinton?  Who would know?  Would dirt be useful in a political campaign?  You betcha!   Would the DNC solicit dirt on any Republican candidate?  Damned straight they would!!  Is that all "politics as usual?"  yep.  The American Way.   Happens daily.  The DNC is dredging for damaging information on any sitting Republican today, yesterday, and will be tomorrow.
Example Output: Non-sexual-explicit

Example Input: Comment: There was a pride parade a few years ago that had an ISIS flag with sex toy shapes, instead of arabic script, along the edges. Send him that one, see if he notices!
Example Output:
Sexual-explicit