TASK DEFINITION: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
PROBLEM: Comment: You realize our equity markets are at an all-time high right now too right?  Having created over $100B in new wealth for us during the same period right?

I also take strong issue with your point - this move will SAVE us money and create jobs - not the other way around

SOLUTION: Disagree

PROBLEM: Comment: Do you realize that, regardless of your point of view, Gov. Walker actually DID something?  The Legislature has only itself to blame ... and I choose to blame it, and not the governor, whose hand was forced by legislators who could have / should have produced "something" in this session and the first "overtime."  

Furthermore, he did something that was not politically self-serving.  He may incur the wrath of voters for this and either be recalled (silly) or not re-elected.  He knows that, and is willing to stand up for what he believes is a solution (or a step in that direction).  How many of our legislators are willing to put principle over re-election?

I don't have to like the governor's solution to admire him for not doing what is politically expedient, but, rather, to put his reputation on the line for something he believes in.

SOLUTION: Agree

PROBLEM: Comment: "Trump names China hawk to head new trade team".

And north of the border, Canada elects China shill to head country...

SOLUTION:
Disagree