We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

Example Input: NY responds by arguing that their gun restriction scheme cannot get a fair test to prove its worth because gun runners evade the restrictions by going to other states with less restrictive laws to import the guns illegally.
Example Output: Valid

Example Input: Yet there's no proof that would support the banning of these weapons would provide any measure of safety to anyone other than criminals.
Example Output: Valid

Example Input: Violence and crime are higher among black than white, lower-income than middle- or upper-income, young than middle-aged, single than married, and urban than rural individuals - all contrary to the pattern of gun ownership.
Example Output:
Valid