TASK DEFINITION: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
PROBLEM: I don't think any animal should be killed to provide someone with a livelihood.  Countless animals have been brutally slaughtered--or had their horns, tasks, etc hacked out if them while alive, then left to die an agonizing death--some, driven to extinction, and all so men could feed their greed. I applaud California. I wish Alaska would do the same.

SOLUTION: Yes

PROBLEM: The stats you reference include public sector wages, where as the article names private sector wages. "% higher than" clearly means just that. If the article had said "100% higher than", would you have said "So the average annual income is about $45,000. 100 percent of 45,000 is about $45,000".

SOLUTION: No

PROBLEM: What are the real issues in this case?  There is no background here, just discussion of money.  What legal principles are at stake here.  Impossible to make a determination without any information.   Perhaps the AG can write his own article so we can at least understand this case.

SOLUTION:
No