The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the no-need strategy, otherwise output No. no-need is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used when a participant points out that they do not need an item based on personal context such as suggesting that they have ample water to spare. no-need can directly benefit the opponent since it implies that the item is up for grabs.

Context: 'Why do you have a risk of dehyrdation? Because I believe all people do but I do understand some people are at a greater risk then others. Tell me why you are at risk?' 'I have a medical condition that requires medication, and this medication requires me to drink an extra amount of water or else I will dehydrate. ' 'That is a problem. Does the medication require the use of fire or firewood as well?'
Utterance: 'No, of course not. You can have the extra of those if you'd like. It is really the water that is the most important to me. '
Yes

Context: 'hi, i am doing well' 'cool, the family is looking forward to the camping trip this weekend' 'same, I will need 3 food as I need food to survive, in return, you can have all the water'
Utterance: 'My kids are really eager to make s'mores and tell stories by the campfire. They do need some food though. But i am willing to give you the 3 food for 3 firewood and 2 water if that works for you?'
No

Context: 'Hi there! Hope your day is going well 🙂' 'Doing great!  How about yourself?'
Utterance: 'Pretty good, Monday's are always bit of a struggle though! '

No