We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Input: Consider Input: Sent1: There are no children being killed, and killing a child is murder in America.
 Sent2: One of the many grievances I have is that child rapists don't qualify for the death penalty unless the child that gets raped is also killed.

Output: Not similar


Input: Consider Input: Sent1: A death penalty case is likely to be appealed as high as it will be taken.
 Sent2: Death penalty cases involve a lot of appeals and them lawyers are really expensive.

Output: Similar


Input: Consider Input: Sent1: I am "for" capital punishment... but if a criminal shows a desire for death over a life sentence, I prefer to be sadistic.
 Sent2: I see no point in letting someone live who does not want to live, or letting someone die who does not want to die.


Output: Similar