Categorize the comment on the basis of toxicity. If the comment is toxic (harmful, malicious, derogatory, threat, insult, identity attck, etc.) output Yes, otherwise output No.

[EX Q]: Ed, I see you're convinced. I'm not because I can do math.

1.5% income tax represents $36 a month from my paycheck. That's 6 fewer meals with meat for my family, a tank of gasoline, a month's membership at the rock climbing club my son loves. Or about 4 hours extra work for me to offset the lost income and the taxes associated with working those extra hours.

You see, for the average person, that money comes out of their paycheck FIRST and they don't get it back (if they get it back at all) until May. Our bills come in 52 weeks out of the year, so for 51 weeks out of the year, we'd have to do something to offset that lost income. I'm sure there are people in Alaska who get paid well enough that $40 a month is no big deal to them, but I'm also equally sure that many Alaskans are in the same boat I am. That money represents a line item in our budget that either must be funded or not, but will be felt.

And that's if the tax is only 1.5%. I've heard 6%, 15%, and 30% on offer.
[EX A]: No

[EX Q]: I fail to see how this restaurant is celebrating colonial rule. Yes, the name of the restaurant and some of the items on the menu reference colonial rule. However, where does it say they are celebrating it? For example, a Holocaust museum does not celebrate the Holocaust because it contains the name in its title. Nor does it celebrate the Holocaust because it is full of pictures of gas chambers and emaciated bodies. The museum does, however, act as a point of remembrance and history. No doubt, children visit the museum and find out about the Holocaust for the first time. How many kids know about colonialism? Maybe they can learn by going to places like this restaurant/cafe.

I fail to see how the owner is celebrating or embracing colonialism. It happened and we should NEVER forget, the events shouldn’t be forgotten about and swept under the carpet.

Finally, if you don’t like it, don’t go. There are much more important things to worry about. Donald Trump, for one.
[EX A]: No

[EX Q]: Even if eating meat gave us immortality, I feel unnecessarily ending the life of another precious living being is immoral. The law is on your side at the moment but denying women and people of color equal rights, for example, was legal at one time as well. The issue here is you feel your happiness and life is more important than the many lives of other animals that you are killing. I doubt the life of any human is worth the unnecessary suffering and death of our animal friends. The key word there is"unnecessary" and in almost every case killing others is now unnecessary in this modern world.
[EX A]:
No