Given a paragraph about cooking, and a set of conversational questions and answers about the paragraph, say whether the passage contains sufficient information to answer the follow-up question. Say Yes if it is answerable; otherwise, say No. The paragraph has the prefix 'CONTEXT:'. Each conversation question has a prefix `Q:` followed by the answer prefix `A:`, and the follow-up question has a prefix `FOLLOWUP_Q:`.

Ex Input:
CONTEXT: Water absorption by flour varies by variety, brand, and even batch within brand. For example, I have an American bread book where I quite often have to use far more water than the recipe suggests to achieve the consistency stated. This is down to my British flour apparently absorbing more water.Therefore, it's a good idea to simply use enough flour to get the desired consistency rather than worry too much about being precise. Having said that, when it comes to bread, wetter is better, so only add enough so that you can just work it comfortably.  <sep>  Q: Salt stick dough and shaping, any ideas ? A: when it comes to bread, wetter is better, so only add enough so that you can just work it comfortably  Q: The dough is sticky, should I weigh the ingredients as opposed to measuring? A: it's a good idea to simply use enough flour to get the desired consistency rather than worry too much about being precise  Q: Make sense>. Salt sticks are from my childhood and I am trying to make them, but I am not sure on how best to shape them any suggestions? A: wetter  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Is one flour type better than another for baking ?

Ex Output:
Yes


Ex Input:
CONTEXT: What country are you in?Every country has some edible insects. Most are terrible. some are toxic, or have toxic parts that must be removed first. This knowledge is hard won, and not readily available. Traditional local people are your best source of information (though the Coke and McD's culture has killed that in most parts of the world)In New Zealand they have the Huhu grub, and in Australia the Witchetty grub. Both of which are edible raw or cooked (roasted on hot coals for a few minutes). They have slightly nutty flavoursThese are both soft wood eating larvae around 5 to 10 cm in length, quite plump and juicy. Such insects can be found around the world. But not all are edible  <sep>  Q: Can we cook insects for eating? A: Every country has some edible insects. Most are terrible. some are toxic, or have toxic parts that must be removed first  Q: So, what types of insects can I cook? A: In New Zealand they have the Huhu grub, and in Australia the Witchetty grub. Both of which are edible raw or cooked  Q: Do you know what ingredients can be used to cook insects? A: roasted on hot coals for a few minutes  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Are these good protein sources?

Ex Output:
No


Ex Input:
CONTEXT: The first thing I have to say is kebabs and overcooked are synonymous. If you want all your meats and/or veggies to be cooked right, I would advise you to put each item on it's own skewer so you can take them off as they are finished.As for a broiler and broiler plate functioning as a substitute for a grill, I would say that it won't be an exact substitute, but you will at least get the high temperature cooking and caramelization you would expect from a grill (you will just be missing the smoke flavor).  <sep>  Q: Can a broiler function as a grill substitute when making kebabs? A: it won't be an exact substitute, but you will at least get the high temperature cooking and caramelization you would expect from a grill (you will just be missing the smoke flavor  Q: what must I do to prevent overcooking beef, lamb and/or veggies? A: kebabs and overcooked are synonymous. If you want all your meats and/or veggies to be cooked right, I would advise you to put each item on it's own skewer  Q: Then I would place them on the broiler pan? A: you can take them off as they are finished  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: What would be done first? the veggies or the beef.

Ex Output:

No