Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.

The termination of a public employee is a "personnel" matter, not a "personal" matter.  Such incidents are not open to the public unless the person terminated wishes to have his/her personnel materials partially or fully disclosed.  So the "we can't talk about it" answer, while frustrating, is correct.  If the incident "played out" as this article describes, I, for one, see no justification for Mr. Roberts' termination.  Other reasons?  You will NOT hear them unless, like Principal Lange in Springfield, Mr. Roberts chooses to have the information made public.

I know nothing of those possible "other reasons."  I do know that, to my knowledge, Mr. Roberts has been a competent, trustworthy public employee.  He's "crossed swords" with the Board of Directors of , at least, oneother entity and been, essentially, terminated because of it.  That doesn't mean he was "wrong" then, and it doesn't mean he's "wrong" now.  The third-party investigation he suggested seems a good idea.......
No

the whole kid dog scenario of yours frank is a good example of how someone with a negative opinion but nothing to support it spins a story to get support. Add your "he should be reported to the FAA" and it really looks like you are desperate prove this guy is an evil maniac instead of a dad protecting his child.
I wonder though, are you a dog lover or a gun hater? I am betting the latter, as most dog lovers, myself included know that dogs are not allowed to endanger children. EVER!
No

Yeah, Another Commenter, tRump is behaving exactly the way he did as a juvenile who was kicked out of his high school due to rotten behavior.  Daddy Trump allegedly put his butt in a military school.  I'll be little tRump received some unwanted butt kicking from his military comrades.  Too bad it didn't take.

Yes