We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gay Marriage) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gay marriage. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gay marriage.

The difference with homosexuality is that most people don't want to break those "rules", and so it's easy for the majority to say that they should remain in place.
Valid

Lambda Legal, which represented Valentine argued that since same-sex couples are not legally permitted to marry in New York State the court should accept the domestic partner registry as equivalent to marriage.
Valid

One would think they RUC would be supported by the Democrat gay rights lobby, but since the still don't have the (D), that's not going to happen I'm sure.

Invalid