instruction:
Given a document, an entity and its sentiment towards the entity, verify if it is the correct sentiment towards the entity. Answer should be yes or no. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].
question:
Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Sherri Papini is Neutral . The department said investigators collected male DNA from the clothing that  victim Sherri Papini  was wearing when  she  was found on Thanksgiving and female DNA that was discovered on Papini's body. The samples have not been identified.
The bizarre case â with many of the most sensational details initially released by  her  husband in an exclusive interview with ABC â has baffled police and set social media buzzing.
FBI via AP These sketches released by the FBI show two suspects in  the mysterious disappearance of Sherri Papini . Sheriff's Sgt. Brian Jackson said the sketches are being released 10 months after  her disappearance  because of  Papini 's difficulty in recalling what her abductors looked like. These sketches released by the FBI show two suspects in  the mysterious disappearance of Sherri Papini . Sheriff's Sgt. Brian Jackson said the sketches are being released 10 months after  her disappearance  because of  Papini 's difficulty in recalling what her abductors looked like. (FBI via AP) (FBI via AP)
 Papini  disappeared Nov. 2 while jogging near  her  home in Shasta County  about 215 miles north of San Francisco.
 Her  husband found  her  phone and earphones near their home after  she  failed to pick up their children at daycare and called police. He was initially a suspect  but the sheriff said Wednesday that the husband passed a lie detector test and offered to take another.
Authorities also said a Detroit man Papini texted and planned to meet shortly before  her disappearance  has been cleared of involvement.
 Papini  was found alongside Interstate 5 in Yolo County  about 100 miles from  her  home.  Her  nose was broken and  she  was wearing a chain restraint around  her  waist.  Her  blonde hair had been cut to shoulder length and  she  had a "brand" burned into  her  right shoulder.
Investigators declined to discuss the "brand" in detail.  Papini  has said  she  was not sexually assaulted and has described  her  abductors as two women who took  her  at gunpoint.
Sheriff's Sgt. Brian Jackson said the sketches drawn by FBI artists are being released 10 months after  her disappearance  because of  Papini 's difficulty in recalling what  her  abductors looked like.
answer:
yes


question:
Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Steve Bannon is Neutral . The attempts to curtail testimony to congressional investigators became clear this week when  former White House chief strategist Steve Bannon  appeared before the House Intelligence Committee and infuriated both sides of the aisle by refusing to answer questions about  his  work during the presidential transition and in the White House.
At some points during  Bannon 's six hours of closed-door testimony   his  attorney took breaks to confer via telephone with the White House counsel's office to clarify what questions could be answered and came back with the same guidance:  Bannon  could not discuss any activities related to the transition or  his  tenure in the White House.
 Bannon 's team negotiated ground rules with the White House counsel's office the week prior to his appearance before the House Intelligence Committee  according to a source familiar with the situation.
The President's personal legal team was aware of discussions between the White House counsel's office and  Bannon 's lawyer about protecting a possible privilege claim. But it wasn't their decision  according to a person familiar with the discussions. The protection of the privilege is a matter for the White House  not the President's legal team  because it relates to the office.
Before the hearing   Bannon 's lawyer informed a staff member of Rep. Devin Nunes  the California Republican who chairs the House Intelligence Committee  that  Bannon  planned to claim executive privilege on topics beyond the presidential campaign  a source said.
But that information was apparently tightly held. "It caught me personally by surprise" that  Bannon  asserted executive privilege  said Rep. Mike Conaway  the Texas Republican leading the committee's Russia investigation.
South Carolina Rep. Trey Gowdy and Florida Rep. Tom Rooney  the other two Republicans leading the Russia probe along with Conaway  also said they weren't aware of any agreement between the White House and committee staff about the scope of  Bannon 's testimony.
"They wouldn't do that because I'd ask what I think is relevant to ask  and if you've got a legal privilege you can assert it " Gowdy said  adding that  Bannon  was in a "legally indefensible position."
As it became clear on Tuesday that  Bannon  was refusing to answer questions  the committee served  him  with a subpoena to compel  him  to divulge additional information.
But the scope of what  Bannon  was claiming was privileged shocked members from both parties.
" His  version of executive privilege is it covers the transition  the time  he  was at the White House and covers time forever " Gowdy told Fox News Wednesday. "That is no one's definition of executive privilege."
Lawmakers were also offended that  Bannon  had already divulged details about some of  his  post-campaign activities in Michael Wolff's explosive book "Fire and Fury " but then refused to discuss those events with the committee.  Bannon 's attorney also informed members that he would  in fact  answer those questions when he meets with special counsel Robert Mueller's team because executive privilege doesn't apply to Mueller's investigation.
Democrats charge that  Bannon 's appearance before the House committee marks the broadest attempt so far at using privilege to shield events that occurred from the moment Trump was elected.
Republicans haven't ruled out the possibility of holding  Bannon  in contempt  but at least one GOP member -- Gowdy -- suggested it was unlikely.
House Speaker Paul Ryan downplayed the issue of whether witnesses like  Bannon  might be abusing the bounds of executive privilege.
Still   Bannon 's stonewalling sparked a sharp warning from Conaway -- the Republican leading the House Russia probe -- to White House aides who might follow the Bannon model: "We're going to insist on getting questions we need to answer our report."
answer:
yes


question:
Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Andy Ternay is Neutral . On February 11   Andy Ternay  wore a shirt that read âFUCK TRUMP AND FUCK YOU FOR VOTING FOR HIMâ on the front and âFUCK THE RACIST ALT-RIGHTâ on the back while out dining with his partner. In a Facebook post   Ternay  detailed his experience wearing the shirt at the First Watch cafÃ© in Richardson  Texas  which concluded with the restaurant manager asking him to leaveâand an police officer arriving to the scene.
âWe ask to tip our server for occupying her table  get drinks to go and leave. One table of white people applauds â he continued. While in the parking lot  a black server approached him and explained he quit on the spot after seeing the restaurant ask  Ternay  to leave.
 Ternay  told The Daily Beast that the only direct comments  he  received were positive and from people of color. â[A] Latino lady at the register thanked me [and] two African American servers said my shirt was awesome.â
 He  said  he  wore the shirt because  he  wants  his  friends  neighbors  and family members to know where  he  stands.
âI donât want people of color  Muslims  LGBTQ [people]  immigrants to feel alone â  he  said. âThe proper use of white male privilege is to help lift others. To speak truth to power.â
 He  says  he âs worn the shirt before and the only negative responses people gave were eyerolls. After the First Watch incident   Ternay  claimed in  his  post  a police officer met him in the parking lot.
 Ternay  made clear  he  did not want to condemn the restaurant nor did  he  plan to boycottââThese things are never easy for businesses  and the workers were polite and professional â  he  wroteâbut says  he âs gotten vitriolic messages sent to  him  on social media since  his  post went viralâ42K shares and counting. The responses are ironic  considering the expletive-filled shirts and sentiment expressed by the pro-Trump camp. But itâs the black folks and other people of color that have reached out to  him  that worries  him  most.
âI have gotten heartbreaking messages from African Americans saying they have lost faith in their white neighborsâthey are no longer confident their neighbors have their back â  he  told The Daily Beast. âMy shirt was a reassurance they are not alone.â
answer:

yes