Categorize the comment on the basis of toxicity. If the comment is toxic (harmful, malicious, derogatory, threat, insult, identity attck, etc.) output Yes, otherwise output No.

[Q]: OK.  But I calls 'em as I sees 'em, and I gave three examples supporting my conclusion.  Could have provided several more (as I mentioned).  But I don't expect everyone to agree with me on every point.

My main goal is to expose--and STOP--the arrogant, irresponsible "animal welfare" simpletons who value PET lives over environmental stability, species-level wildlife extinctions and indeed the lives of their fellow human beings.

As for the rabbits, I must respectfully decline, despite the fact my one remaining cat would probably really enjoy their company.  My daughter loves rabbits and raised them for years when she was younger, but no longer has the time or energy to care for one dealing with three kids (ages 16, 4 and 2).

As for me, was difficult enough to get my land-person to accept renters with a cat, and even more difficult to get her to agree to a second one--a "rescue" I brought home from Sand Pt in 2004.  But thanks anyway.
[A]: No


[Q]: calling me a racist is as ignorant as it gets. your first clue you are incapable of posting anything remotely intelligent is the fact you failed to back your ridiculous charge with actual facts.
[A]: Yes


[Q]: Good. Get BP out of here. They don't care about Alaskans anyway. They and other oil companies don't care about Alaska anyway. They're only interested in making millions while we're left to pay taxes to support their dying industry and then clean up the mess of climate change. It's probably smart of them to get out before the melting permafrost collapses all our roads and communities. Before our fisheries die off from ocean acidification and rising temperatures. Before our tax money is needed to support natives whose food sources have gone extinct.
[A]:
No