In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

[EX Q]: Comment: "No gentleman should ever do that, even if he is inebriated as well"
This is just one example of the kinds of comments one reads about such things 
So, what is wanted then is a double standard: 
SHE isn't responsible enough to give consent because she's drunk, but HE is still expected to be responsible .enough to be a gentleman EVEN when drunk.

THIS is the crux of the problem; Fuzzy logic, weighted automatically in the woman's favour, is what we get non-stop in article after article, and comment after comment - allowing her to claim no responsibility but insisting that the man must always be responsible no matter HOW drunk he is.

Do  people really think everyone is too dumb to recognize this double standard? Shame on those who use it, , and shame on those who go along with it!
[EX A]: Non-identity-attack

[EX Q]: Comment: I can't stand these complaining immigrants.  They think everyone needs to bend to everything of theirs.  Disgusting ungrateful people who should think if they want to return to their home country.  I don't have the easiest name, so I bend sometimes.  What's the big deal.  All the Chinese take anglicized names in school, work etc. while retaining their legal names.  I really hate these ungrateful people like this writer.  This is a personal issue for me, and the writer sounds like a despicable man.
[EX A]: Identity-attack

[EX Q]: Comment: In a free democracy a nation's elections are not influenced by inflammatory false rhetoric created and put out by a nation that the US has been a Cold War with for decades. Anyone who allows this to help their campaign to win a high political office in the US is a traitor. Trump has decades of sketchy dealings with foreign nations and needed to be vetted well before he even ran. I am a former New Yorker and Trump was not admired in NYC , only to himself, he pulled the same stunts he does as president by all his lies and created illusions. Trump lost the state of NY and NYC by over a 20% points, if NY state is not feeling the love for their home grown boy what does that say? It was so odd for a candidate in a presidential election not to carry his own state I had to look up for Trump's counter parts who did not carry their own states either. Only 4 presidents and they are Polk, Wilson, Richard Nixon and now Donald Trump joins this list of losers that he does not brag about.
[EX A]:
Non-identity-attack