In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: toxic and non-toxic. Toxicity is defiend as anything that is rude, disrespectful, or unreasonable that would make someone want to leave a converation.

Example Input: Comment: Or Cecil...Or D-Mac...Or BIG Al
Example Output: Non-toxic

Example Input: Comment: " No one's interpretation of the bible should control how other members of a faith community follow their interpretation of the bible. " 

And this is the problem and is a false statement by Dr. Taylor. A church community has every right to define itself and explain what that community believes the bible teaches. And to claim you can rebel and believe as you please and still remain a member is simply blatant rebellion.

If you don't agree, then you are free to withdraw from that community and join another, or start your own if you think you can.

And the article is a false dilemma about authority. While the early church claimed final authority over the bible, they also claimed the right to kill anyone who disagreed and/or opposed their views.

So to equate the SDA church government with this false spirituality is not the facts of the matter. Dan Jackson should simply start his own church and quit rebelling against properly ordained authority in the SDA church.
Example Output: Non-toxic

Example Input: Comment: You're right.  How dare we expect that women conform to the general moral standard of not taking life!  Essentially, the logical extreme of what you are suggesting is that women be given a free pass on any and all laws and moral codes that are passed by men, yes?  It is absurd.  And, yes, women do have to justify themselves to the same One we all must, God Himself.
Example Output:
Non-toxic