TASK DEFINITION: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gay Marriage) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gay marriage. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gay marriage.
PROBLEM: In colonial times the Speaker of the House, Sal DiMasi, ringleader of these legislative charlatans, would have been dragged down the steps of the State House, tarred and feathered, then banished to Canada.

SOLUTION: Invalid

PROBLEM: Or those rabid anti-gay-agenda people who profess to not be "all so religious" but still think gays are "immoral."

SOLUTION: Valid

PROBLEM: Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind, Nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners, shall inherit the kingdom of God.

SOLUTION:
Invalid