In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: threat and non-threat. Threat is a statement that someone will be hurt or harmed, especially if the person does not do something in particular.

Comment: Completely agree.  The RCAF serves  this country well.  We lost a pilot yesterday.  I hope his family doesn't read the article about his death and then scroll down and see the RCAF's name denigrated in this cavalier and un-funny manner.  Pathetic.
Non-threat

Comment: That's because you are a blind ignorant fool who is incapable of grasping simple facts. I have given you several examples of how they discriminate against 98% of our local small business community, and yet that fact confuses the dickens out of you.  I have explained in detail how they strip vendors of our rights to partake in ALL legal commerce we paid our government for the right to freely partake of. You are incapable of grasping this simple fact no matter how many times it is explained to you.
Non-threat

Comment: It seems much easier to use a gun than up close and personal with a knife. This is what appeals to the users. 
With a firearm, very impersonal. All you got to do is twitch a finger and the deed is done.
The argument about using other means is not relevant. Yes, if one intends to kill there are other means but a firearm makes it much more "efficient" and impersonal.

Threat