The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the self-need strategy, otherwise output No. self-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to create a personal need for an item in the negotiation, such as by pointing out that the participant sweats a lot to show preference towards water packages.

Context: 'That would work for me if I get all 3 water still' 'How about you get 2 of the waters an i would take 1 of them? I need some water to stay hydrated ' 'If you get two foods then I need more items overall'
Utterance: 'you will have more because you will be getting 2 firewood and i will get ! and you will get 2 waters and i get 1 and i will get 2 foods and you get one'
No

Context: 'i am good with that how many waters do you want can i have 2?' 'Sure we can do that 🙂' 'ok so i get 1 food 2 firewood and 2 water? sound fair?'
Utterance: 'Absolutely that sounds great!'
No

Context: 'Hi there! How are you?' 'Hello good morning I'm well thank you.' 'Let's talk about what we need. First, I don't eat meat, so I really feel like I'd need a little extra food, as I couldn't hunt or forage for food at all. I feel like I could survive without a ton of water, but would need water, as I hike a lot and cant trust any sources'
Utterance: 'I've also planned my trip to include a lot of hiking and so I have a high priority for extra water, as like you've said you need to stay hydrated on your hike and you can't trust any source. How can we divide up the water as that seems to be the number one priority for us both.'

Yes