Given a sentence and an entity, the task is to select the authors sentiment towards the enity. Sentiments can be Positive, Neutral and Negative. Select Positive if the sentence expresses a positive view towards the given entity or praises its quality or skills. Select Neutral if the sentence expresses no clear view towards the entity or has equal amounts of positive and negative statements or expressing some fact/quote by someone else. Select Negative if the sentence expresses a negative view towards like harsh remarks, criticizing entities action/decision etc. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

Input: Consider Input: What is the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Charlie Rose ?  Rose’s  accusers were between 21 and 37 years old at the time of the alleged encounters and the Post noted that there are “striking commonalities” in the accounts of the women. His alleged behavior typically included offering jobs to females and then using his power to put them in uncomfortable positions of a sexual nature. He allegedly would offer women a six-figure position that disappeared once they rejected his advances.

Output: Positive


Input: Consider Input: What is the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Sigmar Gabriel ? “It’s imperative that Europe sticks together on this issue ”  Gabriel   a Social Democrat  told the RND German newspaper group. “We also have to tell the Americans that their behavior on the Iran issue will drive us Europeans into a common position with Russia and China against the USA.”

Output: Neutral


Input: Consider Input: What is the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Donald Trump Jr. ? Many of the items Goodlatte wanted investigated had long been conservative talking points  some having to do with matters many considered resolved: various decisions made in the Clinton email case  the Uranium One purchase  the “unmasking” of people by the intelligence community and allegations by  Trump  that he was wiretapped by his predecessors. Unmasking is a routine part of intelligence officials’ jobs; officials have said there is no evidence to support  Trump’s  claims that  he  was wiretapped; and while conservatives have sought to cast the Uranium One deal as an example of Clinton taking Russian money to influence U.S. policy  there is no evidence that Clinton participated in any discussions regarding the sale  which was approved during the Obama administration while she was secretary of state.


Output: Negative