In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Input: Consider Input: Comment: Pope Francis lets the whole world see who he is and tells the whole world what he thinks. I don't always agree with him, but I think the phrase "holy whore" is more appropriate for those who talk tough behind pseudonyms.

Output: Obscene


Input: Consider Input: Comment: How so? She was doing a busy job, not auditioning for a walk-on part in this precious idiot's "journey".

Output: Non-obscene


Input: Consider Input: Comment: That's malarkey. Those movements were secular religions and personality cults. You neglected to consider the casualties of two world wars and the Civil War, predominantly fought among Christians, and the catastrophic wars in Iraq and Vietnam, initiated by Christians. It's nearly meaningless to refer to "Christians," as you can believe almost anything, from having sex with minor children to handling snakes and speaking gibberish, and claim to be a Christian. It's the world's all-purpose religion, and allows you to do anything. It started among the followers of an other-worldly mage who denounced material wealth, temporal power, the bonds of consanguinity, in order to pursue the kingdom of god. It is now the religion of well-off, family-oriented, politically active nationalists. Magic!


Output: Non-obscene