Categorize the comment on the basis of toxicity. If the comment is toxic (harmful, malicious, derogatory, threat, insult, identity attck, etc.) output Yes, otherwise output No.
--------
Question: Silly, it is because you do not have science behind the big wind in your sails. So if you have both a penis and vagina is your choice a "you" pick? Did you know that if God created humans he made a lot of humans with some major differences in designs. Check out the Vrolik Medical Museum in Amsterdam, they have an extensive collection of how God played around with his human design and should point out to humans that all humans are not created equal that there is no cutter design that God uses in his works. So having a set of genitals that does not match to the sex that you feel you are is by no means out of God's creative genius. For the sort of folks who are not deeply religious substitute "nature" for "God".

Answer: Yes


Question: Mr .Gerson has said a lot of words bemoaning the fact that Trump isn't a conservative and telling us what a conservative isn't.  

What he has failed to define is what those 'conservative ideals' are that are apparently being ignored by those who hold them and why voters should support them.  

"Conservative" is like "Socialist"; meanings vary from person to person.  

Social conservatism is different than fiscal conservatism, for example.  Which brand of 'conservatism' did Gerson espouse when he worked for George W?   Why did the voters throw Brother Jeb Bush under the bus?  

Is this just nostalgia for a Federal job for Gerson?

Answer: No


Question: I have a lot of experience with GOP family and co-workers. I can even bring up an idea or a proposal, and they may be for or against it on the basis of the information involved. Once I tell them the GOP supported or was against it, they strangely go against their initial assessment, and fall in line with the GOP party line. Ledbetter Act, allowing women to sue for pay discrimination based on gender, not 180 days from the 1st offending paycheck(like SCOTUS decided), but 180 days from the time the woman first learned of the discriminatory lower pay. My conservative relatives liked that, and thought it fair--until they found out the GOP opposed it. Then they were firmly against it. Wiretapping under Bush? Not a problem! Same program under Obama? Invasion of their privacy! I see the lockstep attitude much more in the GOP ranks. Sure, some exist in Dem ranks, but it is far more prevalent in my experience with GOP voters.

Answer:
No