Categorize the comment on the basis of severe toxicity. If the comment is severely toxic output Yes, otherwise output No.
--------
Question: Hillary:  You seem to have considerable dislike for Sheriff Ward.  I'm not sure why.  However, if you focus on his role in the Law Enforcement response to the armed occupation of the Malheur Refuge, I think you'll find he was reasonable, patient, cooperative with the FBI and worked very hard for a peaceful resolution to the seizure and occupation.  The occupation was a federal crime, but had considerable consequences for the local community.  Sheriff Ward, as I mentioned, worked hard and was one of the important elements bringing about the peaceful surrender of the armed occupiers.

Again, if you'd care to list the "errors" or "mistakes" you feel he made, please do.  Baseless personal attacks on him "elected political blow horns"....serve no purpose execpt to vent your anger.

Answer: No


Question: What blankety, blank message?  tRump hasn't had a message for the rational voters since he announced his pathetic candidacy.  All he's talked about is how much he hates women, building a wall, bringing a lawsuit against anyone that shines a spotlight on his corrupt shenanigans etc. etc.  I hope he stays on this path up to election day.

Answer: Yes


Question: It's 10-12 grand because politicians/municipal employees are involved.  You are right, it should be less than 1 grand.  Just like with the silly TajMahawker study commissioned by the legislature that "justified" the fantasy of its worth.  That "analysis" was $30,000 when it was worth $30 dollars.  Only government employees can come up with those obscenely huge numbers to scam the tax payers with.

Answer:
No