Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.

Example Input: I don't know why anybody's gonna get their panties in a bunch over this election.  Oregon will vote for Hillary Clinton so it doesn't matter if Trump or Cruz win the primary.  One good thing about living in a one party rule state, if you don't vote you don't get those pesky jury duty notices.  (Sarcasm)
Example Output: No

Example Input: These crooks have to GO!
Example Output: No

Example Input: "His own party’s leaders realized he’d become a huge impediment and, armed with insider information not available to voters a few months earlier, showed him the door."

Yet more innuendo and insinuation thrown at Kitzhaber.   What "insider" info are you referring to?  None of you have produced anything that is tangible or concrete in nature.   It is all based purely on suspicion.   I'm shocked that everyone is being so self-righteous in condemning Kitzhaber, that you cannot see how utterly unfair this is.

McCarthyism:  a campaign or practice that endorses the use of unfounded allegations and unfair investigations.

.
Example Output:
No