In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence can be inferred from the statement. Incorrect choices change the meaning in important ways or have details that are not mentioned in the statement. Indicate your answer as 1,2, or 3 corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.

[EX Q]: Statement: Take elementary precautions by sticking to bottled drinks and freshly cooked food, and you won't have any serious stomach problems. Choices:  1. Raw food won't make you sick. 2. Drinking from the tap might make you sick. 3. Brushing your teeth with bottled water would also help.
[EX A]: 2

[EX Q]: Statement: It is a vital income supplement and work incentive program targeted to low-income working families with children. Choices:  1. After a long application process poor families get financial help from the program. 2. The program seeks to help wealthy CEOs. 3. The stipend helps poor families.
[EX A]: 3

[EX Q]: Statement: . I suppose you could make an argument that it's a significant enough phenomenon, so that it deserves to be here. Choices:  1. It was such a different and significant phenomenon that it arguable should be here.  2. It deserves to be here because it's a huge phenomenon.  3. IT was not significant and has no business being here.
[EX A]:
2