We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Input: Consider Input: People have been found out to be innocent after the death penalty ha already been carried out....

Output: Valid


Input: Consider Input: so you weigh whatever monetary savings (if any) over the life of someone found innocent after conviction (even if rare)?

Output: Valid


Input: Consider Input: Granted, someone, who bestows great harm onto a family for egregious acts, doesn't give the government the right to kill that person.


Output: Valid