TASK DEFINITION: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.
PROBLEM: Comment: If the Democrats had any brains they would never "block" a Supreme Court nominee just based on ideology.  If they are not qualified that is one thing but if they are not a left winger that is nonsense.  Maybe the Republicans should then block any leftie from the court who is otherwise qualified.  This kind of stuff is what ruins our entire system and makes people not trust it at all.  We want good judges who are not buried in ideology but can rule on the facts and the law.  How hard is that?  Often, it is much easier than checking a potential ruling against a certain ideology.  Try it!

SOLUTION: Non-sexual-explicit

PROBLEM: Comment: Jill: Just another note.....the rather infamous incident you reference involved a "he said, she said" sexual assault?/consensual sex? incident involving a young lady and three (now ex-) basketball players.  We could spend hours debating the incident.  However, in all fairness, you should refer to "allegedly GANG RAPED".  I spoke out at the time, and will repeat, the Administation's actions were deplorable and violated every standard for patient/therapist confidentiality.  I very much agree that the U of O has a very self-serving "flexible" standard of privacy.  It's cost them a great deal of money in the past and will cost them a great deal more unless they develop and honor a decent standard of privacy.  regards, Gary Crum

SOLUTION: Sexual-explicit

PROBLEM: Comment: Hastert molested children, which, as it turns out, is a criminal activity of a magnitude arguably far beyond perjury.

I'm no great fan of Hilary Clinton, but do tell us how her husband's legal troubles in any way relate to her qualifications for the office of the President of the United States? And do try to answer my question and not throw out the "email server" red herring.

SOLUTION:
Sexual-explicit