In this task, you are given product reviews about dvds. The goal is to classify the review as "POS" if the overall sentiment of the review is positive(the reviewer is satisfied) or as "NEG" if the overall sentiment of the review is negative(the reviewer is not satisfied).
--------
Question: "She is led by love. The world moves for love. It kneels before it in awe." . Alright, Im sure you already know what its about, if not, then just read above, because im here, trying to tell you why you should watch it.      I know, Ill get this out of the way fast. Just watch this movie for what it is, not what you want it to be! People argue that its not scary, or that the twist ending was horrible. Its not a horror movie, its not suposed to scare you. Its a love story. And listen to this: the twist ending?, its not suposed to be a surprise, its suposed form this whole movie, its suposed to define who these characters are, and what they are trying to do. This is a story of love, and of hope and innocence.    I just dont see how people who are fans of Shyamalans other movies can say "I hated the ending, very predictable" because, fans, you know what Shyamalan does, you know from seeing Signs that hes a deep writer, that he gives much more meaning than what you think its going to be.    So please, if the only thing thats holding you back from seeing this is the critics, or your friends, then see it anyway. Why would you let other peoples opinions rule what you like, or dont like? Sure, many didnt like it, some didnt even understand it, but that doesnt mean you wont like it. You just have to try it out.    If you havent had the end ruined for you, thats even better, because you still have this whole movie to look forward to, and if you dont enjoy it, than fine, but atleast you can say yourself that you didnt like it. I know too many people who havent seen it because it got bad reviews.    If you enjoy a good love story, or even an art-sy type of suspence movie, then im sure you will enjoy it. But its not for everyone. Im sure, if you get bored easily, or if you dont have an imagination (this is a MUST HAVE for any Shyamalan film)    And then theres the soundtrack, which deserves 5 stars all by itself because its so magical. Shyamalan is one of the few who knows how to use music for film, who can make the music be a character in the movie.     But before I leave, trust me, dont watch this thinking its a horror movie, because its not. Thats the worst mistake you could make aboiut this film

Answer: POS


Question: Classic Filming At Its Best, Better In 3D . I've always been a fan of this film, though it wasn't until recently that I got to see it all the way through to the end.  In 2D, "Creature..." is good, but only that.  Since this film was intended to be seen in true 3D form, and that doesn't mean in the crappy red&blue anaglyph glasses version, that really is the best way to see it.  Gladly, the field sequential 3D edition is available from two web sites and it is fantastic.  The stereo depth really makes the movie better than ever.  Plus, all the dimensional sight gags work instead of just making you wonder why they were filmed that way.  Being able to experience the stereo depth of the beautiful underwater photography, even in black & white, leaves you wanting more in the end.  I highly recommend "Creature From The Black Lagoon", but only in 3D using the shutter glasses system found in the "Ultimate 3D Collection" from Amazon.com (buy it cheap from a used&new seller)

Answer: POS


Question: Panning mania to the extreme but why??? . What is up with this director desire to do overlapping and panning camera shots? I mean if you going to use it a few times, as pointless as it is...no problem but for every scene? C'mon now...aint we getting a little carried away here. I was dizzy after the first 5 minutes and still manage to watch the whole movie which is a feat that i challenge anyone here to take. You would most likely turn the movie off within 10 minutes and burst out profanities in the process.       The only reason i watch the whole thing not because i wanted to know about this sick killer's multiple personality defense interview but the person who was giving the interview, the ultra hot Brittany Daniel. We went gaga over her role as the devious temptress in Dawson's Creek but as a 70's chick doing the interview....OMG! It almost seems like she was enjoying the fantasy about this guy based on her expression and body movements. She was dress to kill with that 70's disco outfit. The movie scenes was accurate to the times which is a plus.    Still it was a badly directed movie with horried camera work and the dialog was bad too(accurate or not) that even the lovely Brittany cannnot save. Not recommended even if your a fan of the Hillside Strangler. And if you are...seek help!

Answer:
NEG