In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

[Q]: Comment: Those of you who write about enviro-hypocrisy and such, please help me out. Just so I know ... 

1. People file a lawsuit because they worry about ozone layers, climate change, species going extinct, polar ice melting, glaciers disappearing and all that. They didn't blow something up or burn something down, they went straight to the channels our society provides for, all orderly and appropriate. What should they do? Just shut up? Because we know better? 

2. Is there any concern for the environment that isn't what you call enviro-hypocrisy? Can a person who lives like the rest of us (drives a car, dresses in clothes, lives in a house, consumes electricity, and exists as a normal person) still want public policies that might slow down the trend without being a hypocrite? Or are only people who run around dressed in leaves and sleeping on the ground entitled to care about these things?
[A]: Non-obscene


[Q]: Comment: Just love all you armchair quarterbacks with your tough guy stance! Not standing up for any of these punks as they deserve anything they get including the death penalty. But sure am tired of all you Clint Eastwood wanna be's too! How about we address the social issues instead of acting out your dreams of masculinity!
[A]: Non-obscene


[Q]: Comment: Total waste of tax payers, (our) money. Nuclear is a fraction of the cost & your lights will come on every time you flip the switch! STOP wasting tax payers money on this crap.
[A]:
Obscene