The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.
--------
Question: Context: 'This sounds good to me, unless you would be able to part with three packages of food?' 'No, I would like to keep one for me just in case I need it. If it sounds good to you can we finalize the agreement and move on. I think we have something that helps us both.🙂' 'That works for me 🙂'
Utterance: 'Great! Thank you'

Answer: No


Question: Context: 'With the cool weather in degrees lower than expected, my family of 7 are consuming firewood faster than expected. Thus, I would like all the firewood in exchange for the food' 'Oh ok, that will be great. How about the water? Is 2 for me and 1 for you ok?' 'How about 2 for me 🙂'
Utterance: 'I have 3 kids with me who are always thirsty but we can negotiate for it'

Answer: Yes


Question: Context: 'We wantto do a lot of hiking on our trip and therefore I need extra water to make sure we stay hydrated. '
Utterance: 'hi! thats awesome i am going camping too, but not a lot of hiking. I am bringing 2 teenage boys so food will be very important for us'

Answer:
Yes