In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Comment: It's a couch.  It, and this story, and any and all hullaballoo is ridiculous and a perfect example of the MSM making mountains out of molehills to fit a political agenda.  

And besides, as many people have pointed out,  numerous POTUSs of the past (including Great Saint Obama himself) would commonly put their feet on the Resolute Desk.  

If Conway is showing a lack of respect or decorum for putting her feet on some random purchased couch that is barely a couple years old, then what does that say about Presidents who put their feet on a unique piece of American history?  I mean... that LBJ was sure a disrespectful POS, eh?  

Or is that just the narrative when it's a politico from a party you dislike?  Biased garbage.
Non-sexual-explicit

Comment: another Thurstonian:  Listen Bub,  we're not talking about "chasing one unicorn"  we're talking about chasing THREE MILLION unicorns.....and they're "out there"...they're in plain sight.  you damn liberals like Paul Ryan just can't see them because you don't WANT TO see them.  I can see them and they're HUGE!!! not only that, but those illegals rode them to the polling places on November 8th.......you didn't see that either did you!!!! what's wrong with you People!!  How can you help "MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN" if you can't see three million illegals riding unicorns to the voting sites.....
Non-sexual-explicit

Comment: What if one of the three mutilated men had closed distance on this exploding rabid animal with training, a full mag, and one in the chamber.
This Christian then turned with his blade and rage on the Samaritan who carefully fired three shots center mass into the son of a bitch.
Say, one of the hollow points over-penetrated and killed or disfigured  one of those girls. Dead psycho, but also dead or crippled girl.
That's what I thought about a good share of the day yesterday. We used to say "problem solved". That's not a problem solved, it's a new one.
I trust my skill, but that small moving car,  a charging demented freak, innocents in line of fire, that's a problem likely to get worse.
The dialogue that has arisen from this painful matter has reminded me of something that I keep forgetting.
When one person speaking out of rational thought is communicating with someone speaking out of emotion, they ain't communicating.
And they never will.

Non-sexual-explicit