instruction:
Given a document, an entity and its sentiment towards the entity, verify if it is the correct sentiment towards the entity. Answer should be yes or no. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].
question:
Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Sarath Fonseka is Neutral . The government claimed that Fonseka was not eligible to be a candidate as he was not a registered voter.
 "He can't be declared the winner when he is not suitable to be a candidate " Bogollagama stressed.
 Fonseka said he had applied but failed to get his name into the 2008 voter register.
 Bogollagama said the applicable electoral roll in the presidential election was finalized in 2008 and Fonseka was not on that list.
 Dayananda Dissanayaka  the Commissioner of Elections said a candidate need not be a registered voter nor cast his vote in order to be eligible to run for office and thereby Sarath Fonseka is eligible to run for the post.
answer:
yes


question:
Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Benjamin Netanyahu is Neutral . Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu  accompanied by  his  wife Sara cuts the ribbon during the opening ceremony for a bomb-proof emergency room in a hospital in Ashkelon  Israel  Tuesday  Feb. 20  2018. (Tsafrir Abayov/Associated Press)
JERUSALEM â  Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu  is fighting for  his  political life as a dizzying array of scandals has engulfed  him    his  family and  his  inner circle.
Police last week announced they have sufficient evidence to indict  Netanyahu  for bribery  fraud and breach of trust in two separate cases. And this week  a new case emerged that threatens to be the most damaging of all  after one of his closest confidants agreed to testify against him in an influence-peddling scandal.
 Netanyahu  and  his  wife  Sara  have long been saddled with a penchant for expensive tastes and questionable use of public funds.  Netanyahu  has denied all wrongdoing and accuses the media of orchestrating a campaign aimed at ousting him from office.
But with those closest to him under intense police and public scrutiny  and his typically loyal political allies suddenly turning silent   Netanyahu  faces the stiffest challenge yet to  his  lengthy rule.
Police have recommended indicting  Netanyahu  over accepting nearly $300 000 in gifts from Hollywood mogul Arnon Milchan and Australian billionaire James Packer. Police say that in return for lavish gifts that included jewelry  expensive cigars and champagne   Netanyahu  had operated on Milchanâs behalf on U.S. visa matters  tried to legislate a generous tax break for  him  and sought to promote  his  interests in the Israeli media market.
Police have not commented on what Packer may have received  and  Netanyahu  has said everything  he  received were gifts from friends. Attorney General Avihai Mandelblit  a  Netanyahu  appointee  will make the final decision on whether to file charges â a process that is expected to take several months.
Police have also recommended indicting  Netanyahu  for supposedly offering a newspaper publisher legislation that would weaken  his  paperâs main rival in return for more favorable coverage.  Netanyahu  reportedly was recorded asking Arnon Mozes  the publisher of the Yediot Ahronot daily  for positive coverage in exchange for helping to weaken Israel Hayom  a free pro-Netanyahu newspaper that had cut into Yediotâs business.
Israel Hayom is financed by  Netanyahuâs  American billionaire friend Sheldon Adelson and largely serves as the prime ministerâs mouthpiece.  Netanyahu  has noted that a proposed law to weaken Israel Hayom never passed  and this week said  he  had even dissolved  his  coalition and called a new election in 2015 because of  his  opposition to the proposal.  The attorney general  will have to rule on this case as well.
This week two close  Netanyahu  confidants were arrested on suspicion of promoting regulation worth hundreds of millions of dollars to Israelâs Bezeq telecom company. In return  Bezeqâs popular news site  Walla  allegedly provided favorable coverage of  Netanyahu  and  his  family. Nir Hefetz  a former  Netanyahu  family spokesman  and Shlomo Filber  the former director of the Communications Ministry under  Netanyahu   are in custody as well as Bezeqâs controlling shareholder Shaul Elovitch  along with his wife  son and other top Bezeq executives.
Former journalists at the Walla news site have attested to being pressured to refrain from negative reporting of  Netanyahu .  Netanyahu   who held the communications portfolio until last year  has not yet been named as a suspect in the case but is expected to be questioned. Filber has reportedly agreed to turn state witness against  Netanyahu  in return for a lesser sentence.
 Netanyahu  has not been named as a suspect  but some of  his  closest associates have been implicated in probe related to a possible conflict of interest involving a $2 billion purchase of German submarines.  Netanyahu âs personal attorney  who is also  his  cousin  represented the German firm involved and is suspected of using  his  influence over the prime minister in return for a hefty cut of the deal.
As if  Netanyahu  didnât have enough problems  police said Tuesday that Hefetz  his former media adviser  is suspected of trying to bribe a judge in exchange for dropping a corruption case against the Israeli leaderâs wife. Hefetz is suspected of suggesting  through a middleman  to Judge Hila Gerstel in 2015 that she could be appointed attorney general if she dismissed a pending case against Sara Netanyahuâs excessive household spending.
answer:
no


question:
Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity James Damore is Neutral . James Damore   an ex-Google employee who wrote a controversial memo arguing the merits of gender and diversity programs  was interviewed by two YouTubers. (Jhaan Elker/The Washington Post)
A week ago   James Damore  worked at Google. Now   he ’s sitting for portraits with Peter Duke  the photographer the New York Times dubbed “the Annie Leibovitz of the alt-right.”
In one photograph — the user image for an unverified Twitter account believed to be his —  Damore  sits in front of a blue background  holding a laptop. He’s wearing a T-shirt that has one word printed on the chest  in Google’s font. It reads: “Goolag.”
The memo went viral at Google and then became news when its existence was leaked to Motherboard.  Damore  was fired for “perpetuating gender stereotypes.” But  he  quickly became a hero on the right-wing Internet  where a coalition of anti-politically-correct online personalities  Trump supporters and the alt-right believed that  Damore ’s firing was proof that Silicon Valley was hostile to conservatives — and that something was about to change.
As his Duke portraits show  that is a role that  Damore  has embraced. Below is a look at how he got there.
 James Damore  did nothing wrong #GoogleManifesto — Jack Posobiec (@JackPosobiec) August 8  2017
Each component of the  Damore ’s story read like a fulfilled prophecy for the right-wing Internet  which has spent years accusing Silicon Valley companies of conspiring to silence conservatives.
Many of the things  Damore  argued in that memo were more or less aligned with this viewpoint: for instance  that “Google’s left bias has created a politically correct monoculture that maintains its hold by shaming dissenters into silence ” and later  that “we have extensive government and Google programs  fields of study  and legal and social norms to protect women  but when a man complains about a gender issue affecting men  he’s labeled as a misogynist and a whiner.”
The left is at war with reality.  James Damore  told the truth. For that  he  was witch hunted  doxxed & fired.#JeSuisJamesDamore — Paul Joseph Watson (@PrisonPlanet) August 8  2017
The Gab founder has previously said that he believes progressives have a monopoly on every major Silicon Valley company  and has built Gab as an independent  free-speech alternative — one that has been especially popular with the Trump-supporting Internet and its diaspora. Gab said in a tweet that it had raised $80 000 for its crowdfunding campaign over the past week  a period roughly aligning with  Damore ’s story going viral.
Torba also said that  Damore ’s memo was particularly well-timed  because “censorship from Silicon Valley has increased dramatically over the past few weeks ” He pointed me to this tweet for examples:
August 2017: James Damore fired
Because  Damore ’s memo  and firing  escaped the right-wing filter bubble and became a real  mainstream controversy  his story took on a much larger significance. Soon  some prominent personalities were talking about  Damore  with the language of civil rights;
James Damore: 'Treat people as individuals  not groups'
Gab  along with WikiLeaks’ Julian Assange  both publicly offered to hire Damore after he lost his job at Google. But the onslaught of online support that headed  Damore ’s way as the story about his memo blew up was more comprehensive than that.
WeSearchr  the crowdfunding “bounty” platform run by infamous Internet troll Chuck Johnson  set up a “fundraiser” for  Damore  that has raised $40 000 in a matter of days. The conservative media  picking up on the initial support of  Damore  on right-wing Twitter  began to cover the story as progressive overreach.
answer:

no