We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

Example Input: Sure you say guns don't kill people but people kill people, but the gun is only a tool or a means to that end.
Example Output: Valid

Example Input: Btw, the DC ban allowed for residents to keep their existing registered guns and exempted shotguns and rifles.
Example Output: Valid

Example Input: Among other things, legislatures have allowed firearms to be carried in cars, made it illegal to ask job candidates whether they own a gun, and expanded agreements that make permits to carry handguns in one state valid in another.
Example Output:
Valid