Given a document, an entity and its sentiment towards the entity, verify if it is the correct sentiment towards the entity. Answer should be yes or no. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

[Q]: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Tina Brown is Neutral . Former Vanity Fair editor Tina Brown couldn’t please everyone. In her timely new book  “The Vanity Fair Diaries ” she recalls a run-in with gossip legend Liz Smith  who died over the weekend at 94.
According to  Brown   Smith’s girlfriend Iris Love submitted a story about her trip up the Nile to Vanity Fair in 1985  shortly after  Brown  had started her new job.
“Trouble is  picture’s great  copy not  ” Brown  recalled. According to  Brown   31 at the time  she decided to run the piece anyway  but only after a heavy edit that she knew would not go over well with Smith. As expected  Smith “got on the horn to give me the full Texan bawl-out.”
In her new book  Tina Brown recounts a run-in with the late gossip great Liz Smith  seen here at an event in March. (Gary Gershoff/WireImage)
[A]: no


[Q]: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Jim Cramer is Neutral . As the stock market plunged on Monday  taking the Dow Jones industrial average down almost 1 600 points intraday   CNBC's Jim Cramer  wanted to help investors assess the drop.
"I hate to sound glib here  but ... we were due for a decline. We just were " the "Mad Money" host said. "Markets do not go up in a straight line. "
"Despite the large  scary red numbers you see on your screen  the truth is that these things happen. You've got to be ready for them ... at all times  " Cramer  said.
First   Cramer  analyzed the causes of the sell-off. Bullish exuberance  rising interest rates  declines in key stock sectors and weak-handed shareholders all contributed to the losses  but Europe really "got the ball rolling "  he  said.
[A]: no


[Q]: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Fox is Negative . Reports of the film industryâs impending death have been greatly exaggerated. Itâd be more accurate to say the business is consolidating  with earnings for some major studios soaring in recent years and others taking big write-downs. Head and shoulders above everyone else is Disney  which reported profits of $2.5 billion in 2016 and made five of the 10 most successful films of the year (including the top three). The company  which owns Lucasfilm  Marvel Studios  and Pixar  already makes almost $1 billion more than its next biggest rival. That casts the news of its reported interest in acquiring  Fox  in an even more daunting light.
The deal Disney and  Fox  discussed  initially reported by CNBC  would sell âmost ofâ 21st Century Fox to the Walt Disney Company  though not the broadcast network or its sports programming (Disney already owns ABC and ESPN  making similar acquisitions moot and possibly illegal). This acquisition  which has apparently been discussed âon and offâ for weeks and is currently inactive according to The Wall Street Journal  would focus on  Fox âs film studio  smaller cable channels like FX and National Geographic  and international assets like Sky TV. It would  essentially  amount to a merger of the first and third biggest movie studios  resulting in a potential monopoly that my colleague Derek Thompson noted could be illegal.
Whatâs unsettling is that Disney is already focused on making films on the largest scale possible  leaving little room for the kinds of mid-budgeted dramas and comedies that used to thrive in Hollywood. If  Fox  were subsumed  that would leave Disney with only four major rivals: Warner Bros.  Paramount  Universal  and Sony  all of which also rely on revenue from other sources (mainly television) to make money.  Disney/Fox  would be a corporate monolith like no other  with an even larger stable of superheroes to throw around.
As the CNBC story describes   Fox  supposedly opened talks with Disney because of a âgrowing belief among its senior management that scale in media is of immediate importance and there is not a path to gain that scale in entertainment through acquisition.â Disney  it seems  is the only company with the âscaleâ that  Fox  has in mindâthe kind of limitless funds that can compete with expected future rivals like Amazon  Google  and Netflix. This line of thinking may seem a little strange coming from  Fox   the company that distributed the most successful film ever made (James Cameronâs Avatar  which has four sequels in production) and owns the rights to the X-Men franchise  which has been a solid earner for almost 20 years.
[A]:
no