In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine the neutral choice based on your inference from the statement and your commonsense knowledge. The neutral choice is a sentence that neither agrees nor disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3', corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence. If sentence X agrees with sentence Y, one's correctness follows from the other one. If sentence X disagrees with sentence Y, they can not be correct at the same time.

[Q]: Statement: For purposes of this simulation, the amount of allowances banked from 2002 through 2006 was calculated as the simple difference between the reference case projections and the actual emission trajectory of each scenario. Choices: 1. The simulation incorrectly calculated allowances backed. 2. The simulation did not calculate anything. 3. The simulation calculated allowances backed.
[A]: 1


[Q]: Statement: well see i would prefer the cold i'm from southern California Choices: 1. I would prefer when it's very hot. 2. I would prefer when it's cold. 3. I would prefer when it's cold because I hate the heat.
[A]: 3


[Q]: Statement: uh this last tournament i was in i walked nine holes and almost dropped so i shared a cart Choices: 1. I had to walk through most of a tournament recently, and I nearly collapsed. 2. They were kind enough to supply me with with a cart from the beginning of the tournament. 3. They are pretty stingy with the carts, and I only got to share one after nearly dying.
[A]:
3