In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.
--------
Question: Comment: It's too bad the majority of Alaskans are Idiots.

Answer: Identity-attack


Question: Comment: "Gay marriage" ... what a contradiction in terms ... but people think if they vote for it, it will be a reality... :))  It is a sad, very sad state of affairs, when people think that the truth about reality is a matter of majority vote. :)) You know ... like Supreme court decides, tat 2+2=5 :)), or Supreme Court decides that blacks are inferior ...  

 I find this sooo sad ... when people have to resort to the coercive force of the law (decided by majority vote) to twist reality into their image and likeness. What an extreme form of narcissism this is....     

In every other area of life people would lough their heads of at such silliness, but when it comes to sexuality ... people eyes get glassed over ... and they start to see and think things ... very strange things .

Answer: Identity-attack


Question: Comment: It's far worse than waffling! She actually supported the creep until the tape revealed he likes to brag about sexually assaulting white women. The "Mexicans are rapists," "We have to ban all Muslims from entering the US, "women are pigs," "women must be punished with jail for having an abortion," "I prefer war heroes who weren't captured," and I could go on and on and on, but I won't. Not to mention he is a liar, scam artist, cheat, philanderer, misogynist, xenophobe, racist bigot, NONE of that was enough to get Lisa to stop supporting him; it took the tape for her to disavow him. Pathetic. She doesn't deserve to be in the Senate. She is a disgrace.

Answer:
Identity-attack