We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

[Q]: Sent1: So far, I am hearing "an eye for an eye" which is just that vengeance centered sense of justice that I am arguing against.
 Sent2: I do believe in the death Penalty, eye for and eye.
[A]: Similar


[Q]: Sent1: There is no reason that the death penalty, in general, should be more expensive than LWOP and, in many, if not most cases, the death penalty should be less expensive.
 Sent2: Is it reason to do away with the death penalty?
[A]: Not similar


[Q]: Sent1: I'm pretty sure that the states with the death penalty do NOT have better crime rates or even better capital crime rates.
 Sent2: States without the death penalty have fared BETTER in reducing their murder rates than states with the death penalty.
[A]:
Similar