In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

[EX Q]: Comment: Trump's approach on DACA is unconscionable because he is so concerned to preserve some face that he’s willing to leave all the Dreamers hanging in a suspended state, with all the fear and anxiety that creates for them and their friends and loved ones. 











Even if he’s committed to doing the right thing in the end, he’s going about it in such an awful and immoral way that he can’t be given much credit for it.
[EX A]: Non-identity-attack

[EX Q]: Comment: You do not help by using racist terms like "snowflake".  Ku Klux Klan and white nationalists have been using that term since the move to abolish slavery and during the reconstruction after the civil war. They used it against whites advocating against slavery-- they were not white-- they looked white but were snowflakes that melted away. It was also a taunt vs blacks after emancipation-- "hey you wanna be white? You can be a snowflake, but your "white" will never last, just melt away and you are still black underneath"
[EX A]: Identity-attack

[EX Q]: Comment: NP, you certainly have the right to disagree.  But what real purpose does it serve to go low as you can and dump as much garbage as you can?  Does it make you strong and mighty?  The only thing that has been accomplished is that the "two yokels" have proven that they can elicit a negative and childish response from you.  Essentially they control and own you.  Is that too deep for you?
[EX A]:
Non-identity-attack