Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.

Ex Input:
I had no idea there were turns!  I was poor and am semi educated, do I get a shot too? Please elect Elizabeth Warren first though. Actually HC flip flopped on both "trade agreements' not that it matters really. It is pretty laughable to assume that one should have an opportunity to become president because, um you want to. I wanted to be in NASA, even received some books from them. Apparently if you want to go on a NASA mission you have to either really good at math (nope) or be a test pilot ( um no on that one). Not really but this is the tone of  maturity of this article which I honestly thought was intended as humor and probably is. It is really is hard to tell on the internet sometimes. Either way, this won't get posted and I have probably insulted this person on some level depending on how you view this post although that was not really the intention, more so due to the   WW kiss our ass and agree policy :)

Ex Output:
Yes


Ex Input:
You know, you just can't make this stuff up!   

Hillary barking like a dog.  She seems so natural!

Ex Output:
No


Ex Input:
You do understand that you can't prove a negative right? People of faith are the ones making wild ass claims about magic sky wizards with no supporting evidence it is incumbent on them to provide proof of their claims not the other way around.

Ex Output:

No