Given a document, an entity and its sentiment towards the entity, verify if it is the correct sentiment towards the entity. Answer should be yes or no. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

Q: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Caroline Wozniacki Caroline is Positive . MELBOURNE  Australia â It took  Caroline Wozniacki  43 majors and two failed attempts in finals before finally claiming  her  first Grand Slam singles title.
One of the first things  she  did as a champion was apologize to top-seeded Simona Halep following  her  7-6 (2)  3-6  6-4 win in the Australian Open final on Saturday night.
"I'm sorry  I'm just taking a second to hug Daphne "  Wozniacki  said  pausing as  she  clutched the winner's trophy in the on-court ceremony. "I dreamt of this moment so many years  to be here now it's a dream come true."
More than seven years after appearing in  her  first Grand Slam final at the 2009 U.S. Open â a straight sets loss to Serena Williams  â Wozniacki  can finally erase the "but never won a major" footnote that has long been attached to  her  resume.
"I'm never going to get the question again about being a world No. 1 without a Slam "  she  said after leaving the court.
 Wozniacki  will regain the top ranking next week for the first time in six years â beating Serena Williams' record of 5 years  29 days between stints at No. 1 on the women's tour â in another benefit of beating the top-seeded Halep.
 Wozniacki  lost two U.S. Open finals â in '09 and 2014 â and Halep lost two French Open finals before their meeting at Melbourne Park.
 Caroline Wozniacki  plants a kiss on the Aussie Open trophy after defeating Simona Halep. (AP Photo/Dita Alangkara)
In Halep's case   she  was the first player who had saved match points in multiple matches to have reached the final.  She  saved triple match point and rallied in the third set to beat Laura Davis 15-13 in the third set of  her  third-round match  and also needed to save match points in  her  semifinal against Angelique Kerber.
 Wozniacki  saved match points in  her  second-round win over Jana Fett and later said  she  was relaxed because for the rest of the tournament  she  was "playing with the house money."
"I know that today is a tough day "  Wozniacki  said to Halep. "I'm sorry I had to win today but I'm sure  we 'll have many matches in the future. Incredible match  incredible fight. And again  I'm sorry."
Halep was playing with an injured left ankle  needed treatment for dizziness in the second set and had rallied from a break down in the third set to lead 4-3 when  Wozniacki  took a medical time out to have  her  left knee taped. In the end   she  just ran out of steam.
"It's not easy to talk now " Halep said at the presentation. "It's been a great tournament for  me . I started not very well with the ankle injury. I just wanted to give my best every match  which I did. Of course I'm sad I couldn't win today but Caroline was better than  me .
 Wozniacki  is the third first-time major winner in the four Grand Slam tournaments since Serena Williams won the 2017 Australian Open for  her  record 23rd Grand Slam title. Serena Williams  who beat  her  older sister  Venus  in last year's final  took time out for  her  pregnancy and the birth of  her  first child in September  and is preparing to return to competition next month.
Wozniaki was ranked No. 1 for 67 weeks  including 49 straight from Feb. 21  2011 until Victoria Azarenka replaced  her  on Jan. 30  2012.
 Wozniacki  got a break in Halep's first service game and had a chance to serve for the first set at 5-3  but the Romanian rallied to break back and to force a tiebreaker. After getting an early jump in the tiebreaker   Wozniacki  won the last three points to win a set for the first time in a Grand Slam final.

A: yes
****
Q: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Lawlor is Neutral . Mike Lawlor  undersecretary for Criminal Justice Policy and Planning in Connecticut   says the delay is unusual and unexplained. Last year Connecticut received about $2.6 million in JAG grants.
"Every single state gets one of these grants and this year not a single state has gotten it and we have repeatedly asked the Department of Justice what's going on "  Lawlor  said. "They consistently can't or won't answer the question so we don't know. We assume it's because they have concerns about sanctuary cities around the country."
At this point though  the DOJ hasn't just missed the disbursement date. States have not even been notified of the grant award  which usually happens around April or May  according to  Lawlor .
"There's going to be more steps that have to take place before the money's actually received  and typically it's about six months from the date of the award until the date you get the check  " Lawlor  said. "And it's important to keep in mind  this is going on in every state in the country. The reddest of red states  you know  Mississippi  Alabama  they're having the same problem."

A: no
****
Q: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Meghan Markle is Neutral . It's been estimated that  American actress Meghan Markle’s  wedding to Prince Harry  scheduled next May 19  will translate into a £500 million boost for the British economy .
The "Meghan Effect" may give her soon-to-be sister-in-law a run for her money. Fortune magazine predicts that "Meghan Markle's 'Midas Touch' Could Match Duchess Kate's."
According to the New York Times: “There is a blog —  Meghan ’s Mirror — that chronicles  her  every style choice. Vogue has a piece online titled “ Meghan Markle’s  Stealth Shopping Style Is All the Black Friday Inspo You Need ” while InStyle crowed “The Nordstrom Black Friday Sale Has Discounts on  Meghan Markle’s  Favorite Denim Brand.”
Fashion Editor Vanessa Friedman of the New York Times saw  Markle ’s choice of dress as a reflection of the "completely different kind of royal"  she  will be and  her  opportunity to further modernize the monarchy.
“ She  is perfectly aware that everything  she  wears is going to be under the social media spotlight  so  she  might as well make it work for  her  ” Friedman writes. “Even the smallest gestures are going to have a heightened import as the royal family adjusts to a modern identity. Far beyond Britain and the formal royal watchers  many have a special investment in this particular story and how it gets told.”
"Harry and  Meghan  should not be lulled into a false sense of security " Sykes warns. "There is already a significant undercurrent of hostility to  Meghan  circulating in some sections of the British establishment. Blame the blinding glare of new love if you will  but Harry and  Meghan  seem to be  if not heading for the rocks  at least grazing the odd sandbank."
As photos and video clips of  her  most recent public appearances as the prince’s fiancé show   she 's already a main focus of attention for photographers and cameramen. Such was the case during the spectacle of the royal family's annual Christmas parade between Sandringham estate  the queen’s private residence  and the nearby St Magdalene Church  for their traditional service.
After Harry and  Meghan  went to Monte Carlo to celebrate the new year with friends  the comparisons with Grace Kelly  the Hollywood star who married Prince Rainier of Monaco to become the admired Prince Grace  were all over the media.
 She  also was compared to Princess Charlene  the South African former Olympic swimmer who married Monaco's Prince Albert II.
It's rumored that Meghan and Kate have a good understanding -  Markle  and Harry stayed with the Cambridges  who have a house in the Sandringham estate during the Christmas celebrations - and royal experts assume that Kate will help guide  Meghan  through the royal paces.
Despite  her  current popularity and seeming ease facing the challenges of royal life   Markle  will need all the support  she  can get.
“After all  the 36-year-old is set for a daunting transition ” the Telegraph predicts. “When  she  marries Prince Harry  Meghan will be trading an acting career and a life of relative freedom for one of public duty  reserve and near-ceaseless waving – and that’s notwithstanding the private pressures of remembering if and when to curtsy to her in-laws.”

A:
yes
****