The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.

[EX Q]: Context: 'Hello! Which item do you need the most?' 'I would love to have the Firewood the most. ' 'Unfortunately I need firewood the most too. How about I take 2 firewood, 2 food, and 1 water?'
Utterance: 'I feel that I am not getting a fair deal. '
[EX A]: No

[EX Q]: Context: 'I know how that goes...We are planning on hiking too and we could also use some extra food.' 'well I am sure between you and me we will find a way....' 'I really need some food, but I could also use extra firewood. It is supposed to be pretty cold at night and we would love to cook up some smores.'
Utterance: 'I hear you we have the same issues well you can have either 2 food or 2 firewood what would you prefer?'
[EX A]: Yes

[EX Q]: Context: 'Looking forward to doing some serious hiking with the family.  bad luck on the way here we flew in and the airline loss or bags with some of our supplies and sleeping bags.☹️' 'oh nooo, that's terrible. do they know where they left them?' 'I think they went to Chicago.  I really needing replace our lost water and sleeping bags.  I see there are some extra supplies to share.  I could really use the water and firwood.  🙂'
Utterance: 'oh yeah, you definitely do. we have all of our stuff and mostly wanted to hike and have picnics during our camping trip '
[EX A]:
No