We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

[Q]: Sent1: I am not sure, which also begs the question on my support for the death penalty.
 Sent2: I guess the question begs to be asked to my friends on the left is If life in prisonment is so much worse then the death penalty why do you think most prisoners on death row would choose that option?
[A]: Not similar


[Q]: Sent1: The jury sees partially false evidence which has been biased by a lawyer and the emotions of the family members, and then convicts an innocent person and sentence him to death.
 Sent2: A life sentence can be reversed if th convicted individual is later found innocent by new evidence.
[A]: Not similar


[Q]: Sent1: People convicted in those crimes had nothing to do with DNA but police errors upon which they were exonerated.This took place in a time when sentencing disparity was present.
 Sent2: Many, many people have already been exonerated AFTER being convicted of a capital crime.
[A]:
Similar