Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.

Input: Consider Input: Anchorage would be a ghost town if not propped up by tax money - state money and especially federal money.  The people who lecture and pontificate about rural Alaska's dependence on public money  are clueless hypocrites.   And racist too!  Most of Alaska's wealth - spiritual, cultural, economic comes out of rural Alaska.  The whole world knows this. Read a book.

Output: Yes


Input: Consider Input: Bravo, Wyatt! Some people have their heads in the clouds, when it should be here attending to reality.

Output: Yes


Input: Consider Input: Would individuals be required to provide proof of income when they sign up for a library card in your proposed two tier fines system? Is this to become another public service where low income families would be forced to admit poverty and ask for help? Is this a real argument against taking down barriers that prevent kids from access to reading? The library's proposal is a progressive and great idea. If you're worried about kids learning responsibility look to the parents that can afford this high and mighty shit. Life lessons are not the responsibility of the libraries, their responsibility is to provide access to books to the community and they have found a great way to do a better job of this. Why construct a flawed argument against this move?


Output: Yes