Given a document, an entity and its sentiment towards the entity, verify if it is the correct sentiment towards the entity. Answer should be yes or no. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].
--------
Question: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Abdel Fattah al-Sisi is Neutral . President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi  has once again threatened to crush the militants.
âThe armed forces and the police will avenge our martyrs and restore security and stability with the utmost force in the coming period â  he  said after Fridayâs carnage.
 Sisi  has called for a comprehensive campaign to counter what  he  describes as the existential threat of radical jihadism  deploying moderate clerics to promote moderate Islam  for instance.
 He  is expected to run for a second term early next year. Even with a convincing win   he  will face pressure to deliver on promises of stability  especially if attacks like that on  Al Rawdah  persist.
In a December 2016 issue of al-Nabaa  one of the groupâs religious leaders left little doubt that Sufis would be targeted. It mentioned  Al Rawdah  directly.

Answer: yes


Question: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Bart Fisher is Positive . The top recipient has been Fisher Ranch LLC  the family company of Bart Fisher  a board member and the valleyâs second-largest landowner after Metropolitan. The records show his company has received $27.6 million in annual payments since 2005 for land left fallow.
 Fisher  and other board members say theyâve had no conflicts of interest in these decisions  and their attorney has backed them up. They say the fact that theyâve benefited from the program is the nature of their agencyâs structure as a landowner-voting district. All of the board members are landowners  and theyâre elected by landowners under a voting system in which the largest property owners can cast the largest numbers of votes.
 Fisher  was a leading proponent of the agreement in the early 2000s.  He  said  he  supported it because  he  strongly believed it was in the best long-term interests of landowners and the community.
âThe financial interests of the board were the same as the financial interests of our electorate â  Fisher  said.  He  recalled that Palo Verdeâs attorney advised the board ahead of the vote that they were fine to proceed with the decision.
âThereâs no conflict at PVID at all  because of how we are constituted â  Fisher  said. âOur electorate is whom we serve  and our electorate are landowners.â
Standing beside hay bales on his farm  Palo Verde Irrigation District board member Bart Fisher talks about the agency's lawsuit against the Metropolitan Water District. (Photo: Jay Calderon/The Desert Sun)
When they negotiated the terms of the deal   Fisher  said  the overarching purpose was helping California meet its water needs âwithout diminishing agriculture or our community in the process.â
âI have a vested interest and so do all the landowners in Palo Verde  especially those who participate in the program â  Fisher  said.
Participating farmers received an initial signup bonus of $3 170 per acre. In  Fisher âs case  the records show  his family entities received $6.3 million in initial signup payments.
Having those regular payments can function as a âsafety netâ for farming businesses during hard times and can provide a guarantee to help in getting credit from banks   Fisher  said. That doesnât mean it always pays more than farming  though. Looking back at some years   Fisher  said  farmers would have earned more selling crops than having unplanted fields.
 Fisher  is a third-generation farmer whose family started farming in the Palo Verde Valley in 1917.  He  said the fact that Fisher Ranch has received more from Metropolitan than any other business simply reflects the fact that  his  family has been farming for a century and has gradually expanded its landholdings.
 Fisher  farms more than 11 000 acres  growing hay  wheat  broccoli  cantaloupes and honeydew melons.
 He  said while  his  business receives large sums based on that acreage  it takes a lot of money to run the operation.  Fisher  pointed out that  he  and other growers make huge investments in tractors â which can cost roughly $300 000 each â as well as other equipment. They take out big loans and have large payrolls.
âJust to be in agriculture requires access to vast amounts of capital â  Fisher  said. âNobodyâs getting rich on this program.â
Palo Verde Irrigation District officials â from left  Board Member Jack Seiler   General Manager Ned Hyduke and President Bart Fisher â  talk about why  they  decided to sue Metropolitan Water District. (Photo: Jay Calderon/The Desert Sun)
While considering whether to sue   Fisher  said Palo Verdeâs board members discussed the fact that under the agreement  Metropolitan has the ability to cancel the entire program.

Answer: yes


Question: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Ayad Allawi is Positive . A day after one of Iraq's leading politicians declared on television that power sharing was dead  the nation's fractious parties met Saturday in a tranquil session of parliament  where they approved an outline for forming a partnership government. The session proceeded even though the politician  Ayad Allawi  had announced that his bloc would not participate in the government.
 Allawi  a former prime minister whose bloc won the most seats in Iraq's elections in March  did not attend the session or make any public remarks. Members of his bloc said he was in London.
 Leaders from all parties  including Allawi's bloc  Iraqiya  met behind closed doors during the session. Meanwhile  inside parliament's grand hall  which two days earlier had been the scene of a turbulent walkout by Allawi's bloc  lawmakers reaffirmed their commitment to a strained agreement that would return Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki to office for a second term.
 For eight months  Allawi said he would not participate in any government led by al-Maliki  before finally agreeing to a pact to form an inclusive government. In Thursday's session  he led a walkout when other parties voted against addressing Iraqiya's demands for power sharing  which include a newly created position for Allawi and an agreement to allow the return of three Iraqiya members who had been banned from parliament because of their previous association with Saddam Hussein's Baath Party.
 The walkout and Allawi's remarks on CNN threatened to scuttle a pact that had taken months to forge  with pressure from high-level U.S. officials  including President Barack Obama.
 But while Allawi stayed away  members of his bloc took part in Saturday's session and declared that the agreement was still in place.
 If Allawi follows through on his vow not to participate in the government  Iraqiya will be under extreme pressure not to join him in his boycott. Members of the bloc would not say whether they would follow him.

Answer:
no