TASK DEFINITION: In this task, you're given a statement, and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence clearly disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3' corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.
PROBLEM: Statement: Participants also noted that the PCAOB should take advantage of the fact that under the current environment no one has more motivation for getting bad auditors off the street than the accounting firms themselves. Choices:  1. Bad auditors are identified by cameras in the office lunch room. 2. Accounting firms are motivated to remove bad auditors. 3. The PCAOB should not be concerned with bad auditors at accounting firms.

SOLUTION: 3

PROBLEM: Statement: They had ridden against each other and been beaten until they cared not. Choices:  1. The people were beaten in the face and head. 2. The people had lots of hope and optimism. 3. The people had been injured.

SOLUTION: 2

PROBLEM: Statement: that well it can be it it really kind of depends on on um what they were you know what they were looking for in other words if if in Spring crain training they were looking at all their kids like a lot of them do um then it really doesn't give you any indication but if they were uh playing the people that they're going to play then that might be pretty good indication so you know it's it's it's not a great indication because there have been teams that have just you know come out and just won all kinds of games in Spring craning training and then gone on a you know fourteen game losing streak in the first of the season so Choices:  1. Spring craning training is not a good predictor of how team will perform in the season. 2. There are teams that win in the Spring craning training, then lose a lot of games in the first season. 3. Teams that win in the Spring craning training always win in the coming season.

SOLUTION:
3