In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

[Q]: Comment: Rodney Almandinger has at least three dozen convictions in Alaska, Oregon and Washington. Probably other places too.

Almandinger's are shit.
[A]: Obscene


[Q]: Comment: Denying that  a Creator actually created the universe  is akin to denying that anyone 'created'  a housing development or a piece of art. If I said the housing development just appeared out of nowhere you'd say I was crazy and you would be right. Yet the  belief that the entire universe had no designer, no builder and no intelligence behind it and it just  appeared is accepted, with a straight face,  as a fact. Just because we don't know how God did something  doesn't mean He didn't do it.  That kind of reasoning is absurd and not at all 'scientific'.
[A]: Non-obscene


[Q]: Comment: Right computers have not improved the quality of life. I guess you will be sticking to only using medicine developed before the advent of computers? Because computers are necessary for modern research.
And modern communication that isn't a good either I guess. I guess we can go back to papyrus... oh wait that might fairly be claimed by science as well.
And I guess you are walking everywhere you go?
Sorry but the claim that science has bestowed nil benefit is just silly.
[A]:
Non-obscene