instruction:
Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
question:
So what you can't refute you attempt to 'label'.  I guess that's how you 'dumb-down' issues to the point where you can stop thinking about them.  But I won't feel 'guilty' defending my children and grandchildren, and will without hesitation engage in 'macroagression' for their sake.  Don't care what you think about that.
answer:
No


question:
Have you noticed how ever global warming story has a disaster theme?  Never is there a good news story about how Alaska or Canada will have better growing seasons and become more self-sufficient.  No articles on more rain caused by increased moisture in the atmosphere reducing the droughts in California?  It's always bad news. In particular bad news leading to you paying for some dufus to do something that is not needed.  It's just a scam to get money from the rubes - and it's working well.
answer:
No


question:
Fact is, Oregon "sits on a two-legged stool." Solely relying on income and property taxes, with no sales tax, is foolhardy. Then-- to an already wobbly position-- cut off a chunk of one of the legs (thank you, Measure 5)---- crazy!
But that's where Oregon's citizens find themselves.
So with citizens unwilling to pay any more taxes, and with an education and infrastructure system in dire need of funding, where do legislators turn?
Many of these corporations market products regionally, nationally, and internationally. The costs of any pricing increases, therefore, will be spread out over a very large population, not necessarily just Oregonians. In an imperfect system, it indeed appears to be the best alternative.
answer:

Yes