Given a document, an entity and its sentiment towards the entity, verify if it is the correct sentiment towards the entity. Answer should be yes or no. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

Q: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Jacob Zuma is Neutral . The cartoon caused a storm when the Times published it in 2008  two years after Jacob Zuma had been acquitted of rape charges. But van der Berg said Zuma had not followed up on threats to sue until now.
 Zuma is claiming 4 million rand (about $570 000) for humiliation and degradation and 1 million rand (about $140 000) for damage to his reputation. His spokesman  Zizi Kodwa  refused to comment Tuesday.
 The cartoon also showed Zuma's political allies encouraging him as they held down a writhing  screaming figure with a sash identifying her as the "justice system."
 It appeared in the newspaper as Zuma's political party led a protest campaign to have the corruption charges dropped against him. Zuma at the time was preparing to lead his African National Congress party in general elections. Prosecutors dropped the charges on the eve of the vote  and Zuma took office in 2009.
 Buti Manamela  then a leader of the Young Communist League  filed a formal complaint about the cartoon before South Africa's Human Rights Commission in 2008. The South African Communist Party leader was among the ANC allies depicted in the cartoon.

A: no
****
Q: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Nouri Kamal al-Maliki is Neutral . Even with a deadly car bombing and other mayhem marring the day -- the deadline for the American troop pullback under a Jan. 1 agreement -- Prime Minister Nouri Kamal al-Maliki seized on the occasion to position himself as a proud leader of a country independent at last  looking ahead to the next milestone of parliamentary elections in January.
 He made no mention of American troops in a nationally televised speech  even though nearly 130 000 remain in the country; most had already pulled back from Iraq's cities before Tuesday's deadline.
 In a national address  al-Maliki focused his praise on Iraqi troops and security forces for their role in fighting the insurgency. "The national united government succeeded in putting down the sectarian war that was threatening the unity and the sovereignty of Iraq " he said  as if the United States had played no role.
 President Barack Obama  who ran for office on a pledge to end the war  marked the occasion with minimal fanfare  declaring it "an important milestone" even as he warned of "difficult days ahead."
 "The Iraqi people are rightly treating this day as cause for celebration " he said.
 The withdrawal did not command its own presidential appearance -- his brief remarks were delivered at a ceremony honoring entrepreneurs -- a marked contrast with his predecessor  who rarely missed an opportunity to celebrate milestones in Iraq.
 Military experts anticipate more violence in the days ahead. Maliki's effort to capitalize on Iraq's latent anti-Americanism and to extol the abilities of his troops is a risky strategy. If it turns out that Iraqi troops cannot control the violence  al-Maliki will be vulnerable to criticism from rivals -- both if he has to ask the Americans to return but also if he fails to enforce security without them.
 Some American commanders have said they were taken aback by al-Malikial-Maliki's insistence on taking credit for all the security successes in Iraq  but they also see the importance of having him and Iraqi troops appear strong  especially in the face of multiple insurgent factions intent on destabilizing the government.
 Gen. Raymond T. Odierno brushed aside the dismissive tone of Iraqi leaders' public remarks about the Americans  saying that al-Maliki had personally thanked him on Monday night and again on Tuesday for the sacrifices American troops have made.

A: yes
****
Q: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Ed Gillespie is Positive . RICHMOND â Republican Ed Gillespie  already capitalizing on Confederate monuments and Latino gangs  has added national anthem protests to the red-meat smorgasbord heâs serving up in the homestretch of the Virginia governorâs race.
A  Gillespie  flier publicized on Twitter Friday bears an image of a kneeling football player  raising an emotionally charged issue on which  Gillespie  and Democrat Ralph Northam essentially agree.
[ Gillespie  rolls out ad that tries to connect Northam to Latino gang violence]
The issue has hardly come up the race  a fairly sleepy contest until  Gillespie  started rolling out ads focused on the fate of Confederate monuments and the violent MS-13 Latino street gang.
[ Ed Gillespie  went from âbig tentâ Republican to culture warrior]
By evoking the anthem protests   Gillespie  appears to be making a play for Trump voters as well as moderates who see the playersâ actions as disrespectful to the flag or the military.
 Gillespie  and Northam  the stateâs lieutenant governor  were both asked about kneeling players shortly after Trump weighed in. Both men supported the playersâ right to free speech. But  Gillespie  made it clear  he  was offended by the protests  while Northam criticized Trumpâs language.
âMy view is that I find it offensive when people donât stand for the national anthem and honor our flag and all that it stands for â said  Gillespie   a former Republican National Committee chairman  Washington lobbyist and counselor to President George W. Bush. âBut one of the things it stands for is freedom  and youâve got a right to be wrong in this country.â

A:
yes
****