We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Input: Consider Input: Sent1: I am "for" capital punishment... but if a criminal shows a desire for death over a life sentence, I prefer to be sadistic.
 Sent2: I see no point in letting someone live who does not want to live, or letting someone die who does not want to die.

Output: Similar


Input: Consider Input: Sent1: The fact remains that life in prison is cheaper than sentencing one to the death penalty.
 Sent2: it has been proven time and again prisons don't rehabilitate, keeping someone in prision for their entire life in prision is less human than the death penalty.

Output: Not similar


Input: Consider Input: Sent1: If it has nothing to do with the death penalty, how could it have anything to do with lives saved by the death penalty in the first place?
 Sent2: There should no be a death penalty, since by taking a human's life, we are not saving it.


Output: Not similar