Given a document and an entity the task is to select the author's sentiment towards the entity. Sentiments can be Positive, Neutral and Negative. Select Positive if the article expresses a positive view towards the given entity or praises its quality or skills. Select Neutral if the document expresses no clear view towards the entity or has equal amounts of positive and negative statements or expressing some fact/quote by someone else. Select Negative if the article expresses a negative view towards like harsh remarks, criticizing entities action/decision etc. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].
--------
Question: What is the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Tony Mosby ? Federal investigators announced they were offering the reward after  58-year-old Tony Mosby  was killed while driving a mail delivery truck on Interstate 30 near downtown Dallas.
" He  was the rock of the family and part of that glue is gone. And I think that's what's going to help heal  his  children and  his  brother and  his  sister is bringing this person to justice " Sylvia Mosby  his sister-in-law  told FOX 4.
Dallas Police said in a news release that  Mosby  was shot around 2:30 a.m. just before the Margaret McDermott Bridge near downtown. When authorities arrived at scene  they found  Mosby  dead inside the cab of the 11-ton box truck that had crashed into a guardrail.
Family members described  Mosby  as a dedicated worker  who was a trustworthy father and grandfather.

Answer: Positive


Question: What is the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Rodrigo Garcia Pinochet ? Rodrigo Garcia Pinochet  the dictator's grandson  said the clan was innocent and placed all its trust in Chile's judicial system.
 Garzon went after Pinochet in 1998 under a Spanish legal doctrine that allowed particularly grave crimes to be prosecuted in this country even if they are alleged to have been committed abroad and had no tie to Spain. Britain ultimately declined to extradite Pinochet  saying he was ill.
Pinochet in 1998 under a Spanish legal doctrine that allowed particularly grave crimes to be prosecuted in this country even if they are alleged to have been committed abroad and had no tie to Spain. Britain ultimately declined to extradite Pinochet  saying he was ill.
 Pinochet died in Chile in 2006 without having stood trial for abuses during his 1973-90 dictatorship.
 The amount of the bond sought by Garzon -- $77 348 374 -- is equivalent to the amount of state money allegedly pilfered and laundered by Pinochet  Garzon said. He said the figure came from by a Madrid-based human rights group which requested the probe  the Fundacion Espanola Presidente Allende  which obtained it from Chilean investigators.
 The foundation is named for Salvador Allende  the president that Pinochet ousted in 1973. Allende died in the coup.

Answer: Neutral


Question: What is the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Juanita Broaddrick ? … How vitiated Bill Clinton seemed at the last Democratic convention. Some of his appetites  at least  had waned….With a pencil neck and a sagging jacket he clambered gamely onto the stage after Hillary’s acceptance speech and played happily with the red balloons that fell from the ceiling. When the couple repeatedly reminded the crowd of their new status as grandparents it was to suggest very different associations in voters’ minds. …Yet let us not forget the sex crimes of which the younger  stronger Bill Clinton was very credibly accused in the 1990s.  Juanita Broaddrick  reported that when  she  was a volunteer on one of  his  gubernatorial campaigns   she  had arranged to meet  him  in a hotel coffee shop. At the last minute   he  had changed the location to  her  room in the hotel  where  she  says  he  very violently raped  her .  She  said  she  fought against Clinton throughout a rape that left  her  bloodied. At a different Arkansas hotel   he  caught sight of a minor state employee named Paula Jones  and  Jones says   he  sent a couple of state troopers to invite  her  to  his  suite  where  he  exposed  his  penis to  her  and told  her  to kiss it. Kathleen Willey said that she met  him  in the Oval Office for personal and professional advice and that  he  groped  her   rubbed  his  erect penis on  her   and pushed  her  hand to  his  crotch. It was a pattern of behavior; it included an alleged violent assault; the women involved had far more credible evidence than many of the most notorious accusations that have come to light in the past five weeks. But Clinton was not left to the swift and pitiless justice that today’s accused men have experienced. Rather  he was rescued by a surprising force: machine feminism. The movement had by then ossified into a partisan operation and it was willing—eager—to let this friend of the sisterhood enjoy a little droit de seigneur.
A resolution expressing the sense of the Senate that  Juanita Broaddrick  never received a fair hearing for  her  charge of rape against the then-Attorney General of Arkansas William Jefferson Clinton  later President of the United States.
condemns the actions which  Ms. Broaddrick  alleges occurred in Little Rock  Arkansas in 1978 by then-State of Arkansas Attorney General William Jefferson Clinton as unacceptable and outrageous  to be condemned by all people of all races  creeds  and religions; pledges to do everything in its power  including holding public hearings  to probe the underlying causes of this brutal alleged rape by William Jefferson Clinton and an alleged threat to silence the victim by Hillary Rodham Clinton to make sure that the United States does not return to the days when such brutality and violence against women  along with threats to silence them  were deemed acceptable; calls on the Federal Bureau of Investigation  the Department of Justice  the White House  and all other Federal law enforcement agencies to conduct an immediate  full  and fair investigation into all of the facts of the case; calls upon each Senator and every citizen of the United States  in his or her own way  through his or her church  synagogue  mosque  workplace  or social organization  to join in denouncing and getting others to denounce this outrageous alleged rape of a defenseless woman and pledges to join in efforts to bring an end to rape and an end to the fear and hatred which underlie it  and to encourage all Americans to dedicate themselves to ending sexual violence in the United States.
Senators Mitch McConnell  John McCain  Susan Collins  and others like Ted Cruz and Mike Lee have condemned Judge Moore in the strongest terms and have called for his withdrawal from the Senate race. There should be no problem with these Senators and those who agree with them on the House side introducing identical resolutions that promise the American people and  Ms. Broaddrick  that they will at last take a serious look at  her  charges and act to educate the American people that both the Senate and the House will not stand for this kind of behavior as alleged by  Ms. Broaddrick . Or others who accused the Clintons like Paula Jones and Kathleen Willey.
Will this launch a demand from Democrats to do the same to President Trump? Doubtless — and having seen the allegations the American people elected him anyway. Nothing new has emerged since the President took office. The  Broaddrick  allegation on the other hand did not emerge until 1999  and  Broaddrick herself  says that NBC News withheld its explosive  graphic interview with  her  until it was too late to affect the Clinton impeachment trial. Bill Clinton would never be on a ballot with this spectacular charge in the public domain.
Will they do it? Will Moore opponent Doug Jones pledge to support such a resolution investigating the Clintons and the  Broaddrick  rape accusation if elected to the Senate?
But if all of a sudden so many Senators and Congressmen and Congresswomen are racing to microphones to say they are outraged? Then they need to do something about  Juanita Broaddrick  and what happened with the Clintons. To hold one hearing after another about Hollywood’s sex problem. To name names and hold people accountable.
The addition of Ted Cruz and Mike Lee to this fight bodes well for  Juanita Broaddrick  — and finally and at last holding Bill Clinton and Hillary Clinton responsible for their deeds. As even some notable liberals like the Atlantic and MSNBC’s Chris Hayes are finally doing.
The real question now? There is no excuse for this kind of behavior. Period. So where are the McCains and Flakes and other GOP insiders in and out of the Senate and the House in holding to account not just Roy Moore but their friends and fellow Establishment insiders? Will they bring about the Clinton reckoning as the Atlantic asks? Will they finally turn their Senate spotlight on the infamous Ted Kennedy/Chris Dodd “waitress sandwich” and the behavior of their own colleagues? Will these Senators put their time and actions in the Senate where they now say they really stand? Will they finally give  Juanita Broaddrick   her  due?

Answer:
Positive