We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gay Marriage) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gay marriage. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gay marriage.

[Q]: I would invite a galley of sword waving swingers to my house than a hoard of thieves... standing on the porch demanding the kissing cousins to desist as the house is on fire is delusions of righteousness.
[A]: Invalid


[Q]: That could be extended even to say that I don't think promoting specifically male/female monogamy is a good thing because it implies that same-sex monogamy is not a good thing.
[A]: Valid


[Q]: I know the historical meaning attached to the Constitution did not establish gay marriage as a constitutional right.
[A]:
Valid