Given a document, an entity and its sentiment towards the entity, verify if it is the correct sentiment towards the entity. Answer should be yes or no. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

Ex Input:
Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Robert Mueller is Positive . Ok. Maybe something  but we don’t know exactly what. Given all that’s going on with the Russia probe and special counsel  Robert Mueller’s  deep dive into potential money laundering  this could definitely catch  his  attention.
Officials at the German bank told Manager Magazin  as reported by English-language outlets  that a review of company accounts related to the Kushner family was sent to a German bank regulator for further investigation. Information may also be released to special counsel Robert Mueller‘s federal probe.
That wasn’t necessarily related to  Mueller ’s probe.
So will  Mueller  pick this up?  He  has reportedly been looking at Trump’s transactions with the bank. It shouldn’t be a surprise to anyone if the next thing we hear is that  Mueller  is on the case.

Ex Output:
no


Ex Input:
Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Elaine Luria is Negative . The reason I raise this now is because weâve got a candidate seeking the Democratic nomination (and just named to the DCCCâs âRed-to-Blueâ list) in VA-02  Elaine Luria  who voted for Republican Scott Taylor both in the 2016 GOP primary AND in the 2016 general election against the Democratic nominee in VA-02. According to Patrick Wilsonâs report in the RTD (bolding added by me for emphasis):
â Elaine  doesnât make decisions just based on political party â  her  campaign manager said by email. âFaced with the options on the ballot   she  took a chance on fellow veteran Scott Taylor who promised to bring change and be something different  but he broke those promises.â
âLike many Democrats in our district   Elaine  voted against Randy Forbes in that primary because he had shown during his legislative career to be an extreme voice in Congress  particularly when it came to womenâs reproductive freedom  LGBT equality  and preventing gun violence â Luria campaign manager Kathryn Sorenson said by email.
âNow  after seeing the way that Scott Taylor has acted in Washington and the votes he has taken to create chaos in our health care system   Elaine  has decided to run against him.â
Back in January  I had actually asked  Luria  about  her  vote in the GOP primary  and  she  responded: âThat year  there was no Democratic primary for Congress and I wanted to have my voice heard on who was on the ballot.â I responded to  her  that âI would have voted for Mickey Mouse or something in that one.â I havenât heard a word from  her  since. LOL
At this point  I havenât chosen a candidate in VA-02  but itâs been between  Luria  and Karen Mallard  the only two serious contenders for the Democratic nomination  as far as Iâm concerned. But Iâve got to say  the news about  Luria  voting for Taylor really bugs me  for at least three reasons.
First off  I think that Taylor is going to have a field day with this. Already  Taylorâs spokesperson is responding gleefully to the RTD  âScott Taylor is the same guy he was in 2016 and has done everything he said he would on the campaign. The only reason  Luria  is running is because she was promised money by Nancy Pelosi to be another rubber stamp in D.C. The people of the 2nd district will see right through it.â Expect to hear a LOT of that type of language in coming months  and certainly if  Elaine Luria  becomes the Democratic nominee in VA-02. So yeah  I truly do not see how this will help  Luria  win the general election. To the contrary  I think it will hurt  her  that  she  voted not once but twice for the same guy  she  voted for less than two years ago.
So thatâs my âJim Webb testâ for Democratic candidates who used to vote Republican: can you explain  articulately and convincingly  why you used to vote Republican (or even serve in a Republican administration) but are now a Democrat? Regarding  Elaine Luria    she  very well might have such a case to make  but so far I havenât heard it. To the contrary  Iâve mostly heard about how  she  doesnât vote based on party (whatever that means  given the stark differences between Democrats and the Party of Sarah Palin  Ken Cuccinelli  Corey Stewart  E.W. Jackson  Donald Trump  etc.  etc.)  how  Taylor  supposedly wasnât what  she  expected  him  to be  etc.
On that latter point  my friend Josh Stanfield of Activate Virginia posted on  his  groupâs Facebook page this morning something that rings true to me: â Scott Taylor  was a member of the House of Delegates and had a partisan voting record in that body. When  he  ran for Congress in 2016  anyone interested in  his  politics or voting behavior wouldâve been just a few clicks away from discovering  his  opposition to pretty much every Democratic priority.â

Ex Output:
no


Ex Input:
Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Bernie Sanders is Neutral . Bernie Sanders . 
Senator Bernie Sanders . 
Senator Bernie Sanders received rapturous applause from progressives for his foreign-policy speech at Westminster College in Fulton , Missouri , last week . 
Jacob Heilbrunn of the more conservative National Interest suggested Sanders was bringing "regime change" to the liberal interventionism of the Democratic establishment . 
The Sanders speech indeed opened a new debate and offered the first steps towards a fundamentally different policy , but it also leaves many questions unanswered . 
Sanders 's central contribution is to upend the military-dominated definition of national security . 
Sanders also called out the threat posed by extreme inequality and the "movement toward international oligarchy" in which "a small number of billionaire and corporate interests have control over our economic life ." 
That 's not a new argument from Sanders , but here he explicitly framed it as a matter of national security . 
"This planet ," Sanders argued , "will not be secure or peaceful when so few have so much , and so many have so little ... . 
Sanders revived traditional liberal concerns about the domestic costs of policing the globe . 
In so doing , Sanders sought to define a new progressive internationalism . 
Sanders laid down markers for a new debate , particularly within the Democratic Party . 
Sanders was one of only five Democratic senators to vote against the Republican initiative to lard another $ 80 billion onto the military budget , and those who voted for it should be questioned by their constituents . 
While Sanders redefined our security challenges in the Westminster speech , he offered few ideas on how to deal with them . 
The United States does have to "get serious" on climate change , but Sanders 's only policy advice was to remain in the Paris climate agreements . 
Yet Sanders offered no way out of the endless wars without victory across the greater Middle East . 
Inequality , corruption , oligarchy , authoritarianism are "inseparable ," and must be "fought in the same way ," but Sanders offered no plan on how to do that . 
Sanders said we are "confronted by North Korea ," and called for international sanctions to force abandonment of nuclear weapons and missiles . 
Relations with Russia and China also received little attention in Sanders 's speech . 
Sanders also embraced the Democrats ' aggressive posture on Russian interference in the 2016 elections , calling out Putin while condemning Trump for not saying a word about it at the United Nations . 
Sanders even echoed neoconservative rhetoric , suggesting that "In the struggle of democracy versus authoritarianism , we intend to win ," as if "authoritarianism" were somehow like communism -- a global , ideological movement . 
Sanders 's speech opened a new debate .

Ex Output:

yes