In this task, you must classify if a given review is positive/negative, indicating your answer as P or N.

Input: Consider Input: martin scorsese 's films used to intimidate me .
because of his reputation , i felt obligated to appreciate them as deep film art rather than as great flicks .
as much as i enjoyed them
, i usually felt like i missed something .
i learned from scorsese 's casino that whatever techniques he uses are merely there to enhance the story .
no mystical interpretation is required to appreciate his movies .
for example , in casino he uses subtitles when robert deniro and joe pesci are using code words with each other .
there was no meaning more exotic than that subtitles were the most succinct way for him to tell the audience what was really going on .
or toward the end , when he uses three quick dissolves to compress a scene of a car backing away from a building .
again , the simple , mundane explanation is that it helped the pacing .
i do n't mean to say that his techniques are not creative or good - looking .
but he simply uses the best tool for the job .
it should n't have surprised me , then , that kundun , a film about a mystical religion , actually turned out to be quite straightforward .
the movie follows the life of the 14th dalai lama , the spiritual and political leader of tibet .
the movie 's title is another name for the dalai lama which means " ocean of wisdom .
"
his story is told in strict chronological order and there are only a few cinematic visions to embellish the literal story .
( one of which makes an interesting statement : pay attention to the film 's opening shot and watch where it is repeated . )
we first glimpse the dalai lama when he is two years old .
his curiosity and self - assuredness capture the attention of a monk wandering in search of the new lama .
a test is arranged to see if this boy really is the reincarnation of the 13 dalai lamas who have gone before .
several items belonging to the previous dalai lama are laid before the boy alongside some other items .
the child is asked if he recognizes any of the items as his own .
the boy picks correctly , proving that he is the new , and the old , dalai lama .
scorsese and long - time editor thelma schoonmaker were kind enough to allow the possibility that the child was taking his cues from the monk .
before selecting an item , he would look at the monk , perhaps for some sort of confirmation .
sometimes he picked right the first time , and sometimes he made a second choice .
either way , whether through reincarnation or quick human perception , the tibetans were assured of choosing a boy who could be a wise , perceptive leader .
> from this point on , the boy is raised as the reincarnation of the lama 's spirit and the future leader of a nation .
it is a great weight to put on the mind of a child .
in the u. s. it might be grounds for a call to social services .
but the young lama accepts his destiny without any apparent emotional damage .
neither the great power nor the awesome responsibility keeps him from becoming a genuinely likeable , well - rounded person .
certain patterns take shape over the years .
for example , the dalai lama is fascinated by technology .
radios , clocks , and telescopes are some of his favorite toys .
when he is old enough to accept his leadership , he makes plans to modernize isolated tibet .
he also has a soft spot for creatures who are suffering or in pain , including herd animals .
it 's nearly a running gag that he will buy sheep to keep them from being herded to slaughter .
but the most ominous constant throughout his life is the presence and threat of tibet 's gigantic neighbor , china .
tibet and its leaders prove correct in fearing china , as , first the propaganda , then the political pressure , and finally the armies , come across their common border .
the chinese invasion is so successful that the lama 's life is in danger if he stays .
the movie ends when , after much agonizing , the dalai lama leaves tibet for india .
the story does n't lead up to a cinematic climax as strongly as most feature films do .
it just does n't fit that mold . if it were forced into such a shape it would have been a completely different movie ( perhaps more like seven years in tibet , which is good in its own right ) .
the pacing of kundun is more calm and level than that .
the structure of the film is made to fit the characters and events , not vice - versa .
perhaps because the pace is slower , we have more time to notice the beautiful art , vestments , and architecture of tibet .
a mandala , ( tibetan sand painting ) with beautiful , vibrant colors is shown throughout the movie .
the robes and hats of state are bright red and gold .
the bricks are a rich reddish brown , not unlike the skin tone of the tibetans .
even the touchstone pictures logo before the movie ( which is usually light blue ) is the red and gold of tibet .
philip glass composed the music for kundun ,
and he was the perfect choice .
for those who do n't know of glass , his music is like a tibetan mandala .
his building blocks are lots of small notes , tiny grains of music , which are first grouped , then repeated in patterns .
these patterns create interesting textures which are themselves part of a larger composition .
people wo n't be flocking to kundun for
it 's great ending , or talking about its outstanding plot , but it does have a lot to offer : an interesting lifetime , exotic sights , rich cinematography , and innovative music .
it gives interesting insight into tibetan buddhism and takes a warm look at the dalai lama as a person .
on top of it all is the cinematic mastery of martin scorsese , who gives the film a strong , beautiful , consistent look .

Output: P


Input: Consider Input: susan granger 's review of " big eden " ( jour de fete )
it 's utopia , this tiny town tucked away in the timberland of northwestern montana , where old codgers lounge on the porch of the general store to pass the time away and the local matchmakers ( nan martin , louise fletcher ) eagerly pair off the young people , regardless of sexual preference .
there 's nary a homophobe or bigot around , much to the surprise of henry hart ( arye gross ) , a successful but lonely manhattan artist who returns home to care for sam ( george coe ) , the ailing grandfather who raised him .
and with the simultaneous re - appearance of his best - friend from high - school and object of his unrequited love ( tim dekay ) , now divorced with two young sons , the fact of his homosexuality must be faced .
to complete the triangle , there 's
the tall , taciturn native american ( eric schweig ) who owns the general store and lovingly yet secretly prepares gourmet meals for henry and sam .
this fable about home and family is a major debut for first - time film - maker thomas bezucha ( a former designer for coach and polo / ralph lauren ) who is meticulous about minding details , using ballads like " welcome to my world " and " achin ' , breakin ' heart " to set up the concept of our universal longing to find a place in which we can love and be loved .
in the paradise of big eden , what you are does n't matter as much as generosity of spirit , respect and kindness .
sure , the plot 's implausible but it 's a good - natured fantasy
so allowances should be made .
and rob sweeney 's photography of glacier national park is spectacular !
on the granger movie gauge of 1 to 10 , " big eden " is a charming , quirky , off - beat
7 .
it 's a heart - warming romantic comedy about a gay man who does n't die of aids or wind up alone at the end .

Output: P


Input: Consider Input: capsule : a short punchy action sequel to the two dinosaur films made by steven spielberg .
joe johnston directs a straightforward story of an excursion back to the island of the dinosaurs .
it lets us see some new dinosaurs ( is that an oxymoron ? ) and gives us a nice and generally reasonably written adventure .
the film is neither ambitious nor pretentious .
i had a good time . ,
low +2 ( -4 to +4 ) here goes my credibility .
this is a film on which i expect to be in a minority .
i liked the third jurassic park film .
i even liked the second jurassic park film .
in a lot of ways jurassic park : the lost world was a creative three - way braiding together of michael crichton 's novel the lost world , arthur conan doyle 's novel the lost world , and the classic silent film version of the doyle .
jp2 was an adventure , as doyle said , " for the boy who 's half man or the man who 's half boy .
"
that is what all the jurassic park films are .
expecting them to give the viewer insights into the human condition is like expecting your car to vacuum your house .
the classic adventure films like gunga din or king solomon 's mines had under - written characters also .
jurassic park iii is an all out adventure on an island inhabited by dinosaurs .
the characters are a little more complex than they at first appear to be , and even that is a little more complex than i was expecting .
some of the characters who start out looking stupid and useless prove to be neither as the film proceeds .
that degree of complexity combined with those very realistic looking dinosaur effects is just about as much as i require .
i feel i got my money 's worth
.
the story opens with eric ( played by trevor morgan ) and friend parasailing near the forbidden island of isla sorna off costa rica .
this was the research island where the dinosaurs were created for the now defunct jurassic park .
they hope , no doubt , to get a look at the island 's dinosaurs from a safe height .
the height is safe , but driving the boat in the water is not .
the two soon find themselves in trouble and have to ditch their parasail onto the island where they do indeed get a better look at the dinosaurs than they had intended .
flash to the united states and someone is offering to fund paleontologist alan grant (
sam neill ) in his research if he will go and fly over isla sorna and act as a guide .
he has said that no force on earth or heaven could get him back near real dinosaurs .
but again money convinces him to drop what he is doing and go .
doing the convincing is a wealthy and eccentric couple ( william h . macy and tea leoni ) who has been just about everywhere else in the world and wants the adventure of seeing real dinosaurs .
they too plan to see the island from a safe height grant is relieved to learn .
he will fly over this island at a safe altitude just this once .
right .
guess what happens next ?
jp3 probably functions better as a sequel than jp2 .
first it has alan grant and ellie sattler ( laura dern ) back rather than the much less appealing ian malcolm .
sattler has a much smaller part in jp3 , but is still present to tie this story to the first .
curiously each film seems to arrange to have a signature scene with characters holding on to some large metal object that is about to fall some great distance .
one thing that does not quite fit with the earlier films is just as grant discovers that raptors may be able to talk to each other , suddenly they seem to be doing it all the time .
they did not appear to be conversing in the previous films .
of course , these raptors look a little different also , so perhaps they are a different related species .
not only are they more intelligent than in the past films , they are also more sympathetic .
in this story they are not just killing machines , they have reasonable motives for what they do beyond nutrition .
this time around they may be a little too anthropomorphized .
each new film in the series introduces us to some new dinosaurs , of course .
in this film a major threat is from a spinosaurus , not as common or as popularly known as a tyrannosaurus , but larger and presumably more nasty .
it has a crocodile 's head and the body that looks like a dimetrodon walking upright .
perhaps as an economy measure or just to create a mood the visual effects team frequently obscures our view of the dinosaurs .
sometimes they just move too fast to see .
occasionally darkness or fog obscures our vision .
a few times we get unconvincing matte shot , particularly of the laboratory .
but there is less money on the screen in terms of dinosaur effects than in the two previous films .
the musical score by don davis borrows heavily from john williams 's score for the first film .
joe johnston , who directs , already has to his credit two very good films i recommend the rocketeer and october sky .
a team including alexander payne and jim taylor known for election writes the screenplay .
the film they have made is a long way from great cinema , but it still is fun . if you get a thrill from seeing what look very much like live dinosaurs alive today , the film is for you .
i rate it a 7 on the 0 to 10 scale and a low +2 on the -4 to +4 scale .


Output: P