In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: threat and non-threat. Threat is a statement that someone will be hurt or harmed, especially if the person does not do something in particular.

Q: Comment: Sadly in rural Alaska, particularly in Southwest Alaska due to SB91, there is nonexistent prosecution for SA. I have seen SA1, penetration without consent, dropped to harrassment. No kidding. Get raped, the guy gets out in six weeks. It is done to protect the sexual offenders from having sex crimes on their records. And only once in 40 years have I seen someone prosecuted on the 3-strikes your out sex law. You can have all the laws on the books you want, but if the DA's, Public Defenders and judges collude to NOT prosecute, what are you going to do?

A: Non-threat
****
Q: Comment: Vancouver was thinking it was a good idea to pass a law mandating snow tires-  but only if there was snow on the ground? 

How on earth was that law going to be enforced? Who was going to enforce it? How were people going to comply? Check the weather then break out the jack?

Two questions arise in my mind- 

1- Did the author completely miss the actual wording of the proposed law? Because surely a law like that could not have actually been proposed, right? 

2- If the author's research was accurate, it beggars the question: How do people that stupid actually get elected?

A: Non-threat
****
Q: Comment: Crucify one of the varmints and leave him there by the box nailed to a cross with the warning "Mischievous Persons Will be Punished"

A:
Threat
****