Given a document, an entity and its sentiment towards the entity, verify if it is the correct sentiment towards the entity. Answer should be yes or no. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

Input: Consider Input: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Bo Scarbrough is Positive . Alabama RB Bo Scarbrough  yells âFâ Trumpâ before tonightâs title game. pic.twitter.com/RhuhRyNFHh â Sporting News (@sportingnews) January 9  2018
Sounds an awful lot like  Scarbrough  shouted  âF*ck Trump!â
However   Scarbrough himself  took to Twitter late Monday night  and disputed that interpretation of what  he  said  Instead   Scarbrough  claims that  he  shouted  âF*ck Georgia!â
If yâall really listen I said Georgia smh about yâall people in this world [Link] â Bo Scarbrough (@starbo06) January 9  2018
Now  from a distance  in a crowded hallway with multiple people yelling  itâs easy to see how one could misinterpret what someone else said. However  letâs start with the claim that  Scarbrough  said âGeorgia.â
As Breitbart Deputy Political Editor Amanda House noted  âGeorgiaâ is a two-syllable word. Even accounting for different accents and dialects  a syllable is a syllable; and whatever  Scarbrough  said   it  was only one syllable.
Which causes problems for  his  explanation that  he  said a two-syllable word like âGeorgia.â Georgia also starts with a âG â and the beginning of the word  Scarbrough  shouted after  he  yelled âF*ck â seemed to clearly make a âTRâ or âCHâ type of sound.
Breitbart reported the  Scarbrough  story last night  as him saying  âF*ck Trump!â
While we have updated that story to reflect Scarbroughâs explanation  in addition to adding this piece  this is not retraction. It is still my belief that  Scarbrough  said âTrump â and not âGeorgia.â

Output: no


Input: Consider Input: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Rogelio Martinez is Neutral . Rogelio Martinez  died while patrolling in the Big Bend Sector of the border in Texas. The agent and  his  partner were responding to activity near a freeway in the Van Horn Station area when they were attacked.  Martinez ’s partner  Stephen Garland  survived.
The manner of  Martinez ’s death is still “undetermined.”
 Martinez ’s fiancée  Angie Ochoa  said she believes the autopsy report is cover-up.
Ochoa said the FBI is focusing on the medication in  Martinez ’s body instead of finding the person who killed  him .

Output: yes


Input: Consider Input: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Timothy R. Kuklo is Positive . The report on the investigation  which was conducted by a panel at Washington University into a study by Dr. Timothy R. Kuklo  was completed on Wednesday.
 Kuklo resigned his post at Washington University this summer amid a controversy over the study  which involved a Medtronic bone growth product called Infuse.
 Kuklo conducted the research in question while a surgeon at Walter Reed Army Medical Center in Washington. He became a highly paid consultant to Medtronic when he joined Washington University in St. Louis in mid-2006.
 In a report last year  Army officials accused him of inflating the number of combat soldiers whose leg injuries had been successfully treated with the product. Officials also found that he had forged the names of four Army doctors before submitting the study to a medical journal for publication.
 After a lengthy review  the Washington University panel concluded that it had been possible for Kuklo to support the number of leg injuries he reported if such injuries were defined broadly. The panel also raised the possibility that some of the data discrepancies had reflected problems in Walter Reed's patient record-keeping system.
Kuklo to support the number of leg injuries he reported if such injuries were defined broadly. The panel also raised the possibility that some of the data discrepancies had reflected problems in Walter Reed's patient record-keeping system.
 Seizing on that finding  Kuklo's lawyer sent a letter on Thursday to Sen. Charles E. Grassley  describing it as exonerating his client. Grassley  a R-Iowa  began an investigation of Kuklo's study after it was the subject of a Page 1 article in The New York Times in May.
 In his presentations to the panel  Kuklo maintained that he had included the other doctors' names as a courtesy and had not intended to mislead any one. But the committee disagreed  finding that Kuklo's decision to use four different handwriting styles to sign for the physicians suggested "intentional deception."
 The panel also found that Kuklo had committed research misconduct in representations he made about another study. As a result of the controversy surrounding his Infuse study  Medtronic suspended his consulting agreement.
 In recommending sanctions  the panel pointed out that Kuklo had already left the institution voluntarily. In its statement  Washington University said that his resignation was not being reconsidered.


Output: yes