The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the self-need strategy, otherwise output No. self-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to create a personal need for an item in the negotiation, such as by pointing out that the participant sweats a lot to show preference towards water packages.

[Q]: Context: 'Haha yup me too. I have a teenage son who eats about 5000 calories a day. Okay, I think the most fair option is one of takes 2 firewood and 1 of the other two items. I don't care who.' 'Sure. How about you take 2 firewood, and 1 food and 1 water?' 'That's fine with me. This should be a great weekend to get out.'
Utterance: 'yes sounds good! hope it doesn't rain'
[A]: No


[Q]: Context: 'yes ofcourse i agree with you.my dear friend will you have 1 food 3 firewood and 3 water' 'I would prefer 2 food and less firewood. There is tons of firewood where I am but there is no lake so I can't fish. No berries around here either. It's pretty scarce' 'okay is 2 food 1 firewood okay for you while i get 1 food 2 firewood and 3 water'
Utterance: 'I'm going to need some water as well. How about 2 food, 2 water and 0 firewood for me?'
[A]: Yes


[Q]: Context: 'I need extra food. I have recently  been ill and my doctor has prescribed extra calories so I can regain my strength.' 'I’m sorry to hear that! If there are 3 packages of food please take 2 of them. I could stand to eat less!' 'Thank you. That deal is perfect!🙂'
Utterance: 'Sounds good to me. Let me see how to execute this trade!'
[A]:
No