We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Ex Input:
Sent1: Some innocent people are still sentenced to death, and that's where I see a problem.
 Sent2: A perfect judiciary system would not sentence innocent people, and would alleviate all problems with the death penalty.

Ex Output:
Not similar


Ex Input:
Sent1: I believe that people who have killed, raped, tortured, or have done any other extreme act of violence should get the death penalty.
 Sent2: Because we are all potential victims of violent crime, and I believe that there are violent crimes deserving of the death penalty.

Ex Output:
Not similar


Ex Input:
Sent1: Punishment and retribution is a right of the family after there loved ones were taken away from them and no one should tell them that they do not have the right to.
 Sent2: Because they love to butt-fuck and they're usually pro-capitol punishment.

Ex Output:

Not similar