Given a passage with a context and an answer, construct a question on the basis of the information present in the passage. Construct the question in such a way that (i) it is unambiguous, (ii) it is answerable from the passage, (iii) its answer is unique (iv) it answer uses text phrases from the passage. Avoid creating questions that (i) can't be answered correctly without actually understanding the passage and (ii) uses the same words or phrases given in the passage.

Q: Context: Previous studies have suggested that post-irradiation GH insufficiency results from a loss of GHRH secretion, since many patients were able to release GH following exogenous GHRH stimulation. However, supramaximal doses of GHRH were used and the response may decline with time after radiotherapy. We re-evaluated the GHRH dose-response curve in patients post cranial irradiation and in controls.', 'Randomized controlled study.', 'Five adult male long-term survivors of childhood brain tumours (median age 21.8 years (18.4-26.7); 13.7 years (11.4-15.7) post-radiotherapy, >30Gy) and five matched controls were studied. An intravenous bolus of GHRH(1-29)NH(2) was administered in doses at the lower (0.05 microg/kg) and upper (0.15 microg/kg) range of the dose-response curves for young males, as well as the standard supramaximal dose (1. 0 microg/kg). GH was measured before stimulation, every 2min for the first hour and every 5min for the second hour. All studies were conducted in a random fashion.', 'Significantly lower peak and area under the curve (AUC) GH concentrations occurred in the irradiated group using 0.15 microg/kg (median peak Irradiated, 4. 5mU/l vs median Controls, 37.4mU/l; P<0.01) and 1.0 microg/kg (median peak Irradiated, 4.8mU/l vs median Controls, 15.2mU/l; P<0. 05) GHRH(1-29)NH(2). In irradiated subjects there was an incremental rise in GH output with increasing doses of GHRH(1-29)NH(2 )(median AUC: 122mU/l.min vs 179mU/l.min vs 268mU/l.min; P=0.007) reflecting altered pituitary sensitivity and reduced responsiveness.
Answer: The GH response to bolus GHRH(1-29)NH(2) is attenuated in adult long-term survivors of childhood brain tumours. This may reflect direct pituitary damage and/or the loss of the tropic effects of chronic GHRH deficiency.

A: Is the GH response to low-dose bolus growth hormone-releasing hormone ( GHRH ( 1-29 ) NH2 ) attenuated in patients with longstanding post-irradiation GH insufficiency?
****
Q: Context: Recently we have shown that the imunoglobulins G from blood serum of some multiple sclerosis patients are capable of cleaving histone H1.', 'To check whether histone H1-hydrolyzing abzymes could be detected not only in blood plasma of autoimmune patients, but also during cancer development, particularly during the onset of multiple myeloma.', "Immunoglobulines were isolated from blood serum of multiple myeloma patients (n = 11) by precipitation with 50% ammonium sulfate and tested for proteolytic activity toward linker and core calf thymus histones. Antibody preparations able to cleaved histone H1 were subjected to affinity chromatography on histone H1-Sepharose with following analysis of chromatographic fractions' protease activity. To prove that antibody molecules are responsible for hydrolysis of histone H1, gel filtration at acidic pH with subsequent examination of protease activity of chromatographic fractions (pH-shock analysis) was used.", 'It was found that 3 of 11 antibody preparations are capable of hydrolyzing calf thymus histone H1 but not core histones. It was shown that histone H1-hydrolysing activity of 2 proteolytically active antibody preparations is associated with IgGs that possess affinity towards histone H1. pH-shock analysis proved that protease activity towards histone H1 is intrinsic property of IgG molecules.
Answer: We demonstrated the existence of previously unknown histone H1 hydrolyzing IgG abzymes in the serum of multiple myeloma patients. Possible biological role of hisH1-hydrolyzing antibodies in patients with multiple myeloma was discussed.

A: Are blood serum immunoglobulins of patients with multiple myeloma capable of hydrolysing histone H1?
****
Q: Context: (1) Compare ideal cut-off points for DS and %FEV1 at 1 and 3\xa0h\xa0to predict hospitalization/relapse in subjects with moderate to severe asthma exacerbation (2) Develop a multivariate regression model using DS, %FEV1, demographic, and clinical variables to predict hospitalization/relapse.', 'Subjects with acute exacerbation of asthma (FEV1 <50% predicted following 30\xa0min\xa0of standardized treatment: 5\xa0mg nebulized albuterol; 0.5-1.5\xa0mg nebulized ipratropium; and 50\xa0mg oral prednisone) were eligible. All subjects had %FEV1 and DS obtained at baseline and hourly for 3\xa0h. Using hospitalization/relapse as the outcome of interest; we compared the area under the receiveroperator curves (AUC) between the 1 and 3\xa0h\xa0DS and %FEV1 measurements, and the AUC for the change in DS and %FEV1 between baseline and hour-3. We determined ideal cut-points for %FEV1 and DS to maximize sensitivity and specificity. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and positive and negative likelihood ratios (LR) were compared between %FEV1 and DS. We developed a multivariate regression model examining the association of specific demographic and clinical variables to hospitalization/relapse.', '142 patients were included for analysis. The AUC was greatest for the 3-h\xa0DS (0.721), followed by the 3-h\xa0%FEV1 (0.669). Optimum cut-off values were a DS of 2, and an FEV1 of 42%. These were associated with a +LR for the composite outcome of 3.06 and 2.48 respectively. Logistic regression showed baseline DS, 3-h\xa0DS, change in DS, and oxygen use at hour 3 were all associated with the composite outcome.
Answer: The 3-h score for %FEV1 and DS performed better than scores at any other time point and better than either parameter over time. The 3-h DS had the greatest association with the composite outcome. Neither test was a strong enough predictor to be used solely for this purpose.

A:
Are repeated dyspnea score and percent FEV1 modest predictors of hospitalization/relapse in patients with acute asthma exacerbation?
****