Categorize the comment on the basis of severe toxicity. If the comment is severely toxic output Yes, otherwise output No.

Input: Consider Input: Looker, the state pays less than 8% in total liquor sales to the exclusive contractors, hardly a cash cow after they pay for leases on buildings, payroll, taxes, etc. The average bottle sells for about $12 which means the contractor makes about .96 cents per bottle sold. As it stands, most contractors in markets with multiple stores are barely getting by. None would survive if the state allowed another 240 stores.

Output: No


Input: Consider Input: Actually that is exactly the fourth and latest excuse Lisa sent me as to why she was opposed to giving Merrick Garland the traditional hearings and votes for SCOTUS. She said that as Chair of a Committee she had to respect Chairman Grassley's obstructionist refusal to hold Judiciary hearings. Right? Doesn't matter if the Chairman is working contrary to historic Congressional norms in her eyes, all that matters is that he is a Chairman. Sort of like how she supports the ludicrously unqualified Trump simply because he is the Republican nominee. Party over country over and over again for Murkowski.

Output: No


Input: Consider Input: Another Islamic attack, and still Obama and the left want to blame the symptom instead of the root of the problem.
Come on Obama you can say it, let me help you: I-S-L-A-M-I-C    T-E-R-R-O-R-I-S-M


Output: Yes