In this task, you are given a part of an article. Your task is to generate headline (title) for this text. Preferred headlines are under fifteen words.

Q: The deep Boltzmann machine (DBM) has been an important development in the quest for powerful “deep” probabilistic models. To date, simultaneous or joint training of all layers of the DBM has been largely unsuccessful with existing training methods. We introduce a simple regularization scheme that encourages the weight vectors associated with each hidden unit to have similar norms. We demonstrate that this regularization can be easily combined with standard stochastic maximum likelihood to yield an effective training strategy for the simultaneous training of all layers of the deep Boltzmann machine.

A: On Training Deep Boltzmann Machines
****
Q: Self-paced learning (SPL) has been attracting increasing attention in machine learning and computer vision. Albeit empirically substantiated to be effective, the investigation on its theoretical insight is still a blank. It is even unknown that what objective a general SPL regime converges to. To this issue, this study attempts to initially provide some new insights under this “heuristic” learning scheme. Specifically, we prove that the solving strategy on SPL exactly accords with a majorization minimization algorithm, a well known technique in optimization and machine learning, implemented on a latent objective. A more interesting finding is that, the loss function contained in this latent objective has a similar configuration with non-convex regularized penalty, an attractive topic in statistics and machine learning. In particular, we show that the previous hard and linear self-paced regularizers are equivalent to the capped norm and minimax concave plus penalties, respectively, both being widely investigated in statistics. Such connections between SPL and previous known researches enhance new insightful comprehension on SPL, like convergence and parameter setting rationality. The correctness of the proposed theory is substantiated by experimental results on synthetic and UCI data sets.

A: What Objective Does Self-paced Learning Indeed Optimize?
****
Q: We consider emphatic temporal-difference learning algorithms for policy evaluation in discounted Markov decision processes with finite spaces. Such algorithms were recently proposed by Sutton, Mahmood, and White (2015) as an improved solution to the problem of divergence of off-policy temporal-difference learning with linear function approximation. We present in this paper the first convergence proofs for two emphatic algorithms, ETD(λ) and ELSTD(λ). We prove, under general off-policy conditions, the convergence in L for ELSTD(λ) iterates, and the almost sure convergence of the approximate value functions calculated by both algorithms using a single infinitely long trajectory. Our analysis involves new techniques with applications beyond emphatic algorithms leading, for example, to the first proof that standard TD(λ) also converges under off-policy training for λ sufficiently large.

A:
On Convergence of Emphatic Temporal-Difference Learning∗
****