Categorize the comment on the basis of severe toxicity. If the comment is severely toxic output Yes, otherwise output No.

Input: Consider Input: That's a common misconception about tenured faculty. It depends on the department, college or university. Some tenured faculty are expected to publish a lot, whereas others are not expected to publish at all. I know of full professors who haven't published in a decade but have earned "honors" and "awards" and pay increases not contingent on publishing. Some are rewarded for other activities, or simply by the reputation they earned many years ago. Sometimes, like in any organization, there is favoritism, nepotism, etc.

The status of tenure is also changing with this new generation of faculty, as universities and colleges no longer have (and most can't financially sustain) as many tenured faculty as they once did. This coincides with the fact that the structure of higher education is also changing as online education is becoming more prominent and campus-based higher education is less necessary for delivering quality research and instruction to a wide audience anywhere.

Output: No


Input: Consider Input: I agree that all of these are frightening aspects of Trump. However, some of them apply equally to Clinton. I've been sitting through a primary where Clinton and her surrogates have been belittling even those liberals who don't support her (calling them sexist, stupid, etc.) She also has a history of doing whatever it takes to get her way regardless of the cost to others (ACA, eagerness to use military force, etc.) And both Trump and Clinton are corporatists.

Trump scares me, yes, but Clinton does as well.

Output: Yes


Input: Consider Input: Mostly teachers are also angry. In fact, I haven't met one that is not.  I am a PPS teacher.


Output: No