In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine the neutral choice based on your inference from the statement and your commonsense knowledge. The neutral choice is a sentence that neither agrees nor disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3', corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence. If sentence X agrees with sentence Y, one's correctness follows from the other one. If sentence X disagrees with sentence Y, they can not be correct at the same time.

[Q]: Statement: From here it is possible to stop and admire the view. Choices: 1. It is possible to stop and take in the view from here. 2. It's not feasible to stop here and admire the view. 3. From here it is possible to admire the view of the lake.
[A]: 3


[Q]: Statement: This holding not only has no foundation in our jurisprudence Choices: 1. Our jurisprudence is clearly the foundation for this holding. 2. Holdings can have foundations in our jurisprudence. 3. This holding is that all people are entitled to keep and raise chickens in their houses.
[A]: 3


[Q]: Statement: Would the mere fact of his having been admitted to 56 the house be sufficient?  Choices: 1. Would the fact of him breaking into the house be ignored? 2. Did he have to find other reasons for being there? 3. Would it be enough that he was admitted to the house?
[A]:
2