In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: threat and non-threat. Threat is a statement that someone will be hurt or harmed, especially if the person does not do something in particular.

[EX Q]: Comment: I have a lot of respect for Ed Broadbent, but as long as the NDP are in the pocket of the unions, especially the public service unions, having them form a government would be very very dangerous. Unions are as bad if not worse than large commercial interests. Unions are more hypocritical, self righteous and less accountable to their stakeholders than their business counterparts.
[EX A]: Non-threat

[EX Q]: Comment: Removing the bags would be an extra beating.
[EX A]: Threat

[EX Q]: Comment: The Dems were selling us out. Obama was giving away the keys to America, and Clinton would have continued the same. Our sovereignty was going to be further eroded by the TPP. We barely killed SOPA and PIPA five years ago. Clinton was going to be a continuation of Obama's policies of favoring minorities, of accelerating the increase of America's minority population. This will eventually shift the power base in America, from "Old-White-Money" to the "Heinz57-Globalists", shifting America's sovereignty towards an international government and courts.
I've known for a long time that Trump is a white supremacist. I don't like Trump being president, not at all. I don't like the prospect of a New World Order even more so. I accept Trump, and all the racial strife spinning off of his presidency, as the price to pay, to keep America out of the Globalists grasp.
I have chosen what I consider the lesser of two evils. The one hurts all minorities in America, the other hurts America itself. GBA.
[EX A]:
Non-threat