In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: toxic and non-toxic. Toxicity is defiend as anything that is rude, disrespectful, or unreasonable that would make someone want to leave a converation.

Input: Consider Input: Comment: Not so sure - one of my sons says he'll be able to retire by age 35 or so, he's never even been on a date and has never spent a dime on a partner of any kind.

Output: Non-toxic


Input: Consider Input: Comment: Only the stupid ones, and look at what we got in return. Good choice WLBs.

Output: Toxic


Input: Consider Input: Comment: Let me be more explicit then.  If you were a religious  'believer' I would cut you some slack because you are seriously handicapped in the logic department because you accept things on 'faith' rather than more measurable and verifiable metrics.

If, on the other hand, you have no actual moral values and are willing to use religious bigotry to advance your argument(s), as you appear to be, you get no such dispensation.  You care nothing for 'values' or 'ethics' or such; only your desired end result is important. 

At that point, your comptemptability   quotient is such that you should only be ignored.  

Any further questions?


Output: Non-toxic