instruction:
In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.
question:
Comment: If you feel that the gains in gender equality (If they were gains and not just part of the culture before the revolution) negates the starvation, lack of basic luxuries freely obtainable in the west, loss of freedom and the reintroduction of slavery - the gulags were labour camps after all where people not only worked without wages in the worst conditions in the frozen tundra without adequate sustenance- then perhaps you should re-examine your priorities.  How many Soviet leaders were female?
answer:
Non-obscene


question:
Comment: Who gives a darn about the so called three founding nations. There is blatant bigotry and hypocrisy when that term "founding nations" is used as a smoke screen for racism. My family has been here for well over two hundred years. Does that give me license to discriminate against others? No!  If ratepayer’s referendums were the standard for zoning changes, NIMBYs would stop 90 of all development. In this case the referendum was invoked, because of local resistance (code word for racism) to the development. The referendum was used by weak politicians for cover.
answer:
Obscene


question:
Comment: Then we should likewise be able to shoot people who show "ANY slight hint of aggression towards children", after all people are animals too and usually much, much more dangerous than any dog. At least a dog will do you the courtesy of growling at you before it attacks, a human will smile and wish you good day and in the next breath shoot you in the face.
answer:

Non-obscene