In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

Comment: _"like all Republicans: show me the money"_ -- GoDucks!

I have to love this. Some anonymous person, posting as "GoDucks!" is trying to knock a candidate for raising money.
 
Ummm. It's Nike's money that has turned UO from an educational institution into a semi-pro athletic money machine and party school.

Go Ducks indeed!

-- Paul
Non-identity-attack

Comment: Re: "when you are asked to leave a plane on which you are, after all, only a guest?"

There's a difference between a "guest" and a fully paid customer. Both you and United Airlines should learn the difference. I sincerely doubt when you invite guests over to dinner, you make them pay you for it, and then beat them up after they do.
Non-identity-attack

Comment: Your ridiculous partisan trip rewriting history is duly noted.  In actual fact, Scheer was popular in all corners of the House and considered by most MPs to have been a strong and independent and successful speaker.  (This record is one reason he has so much support among his fellow MPs for the leadership.) 

If you want to study really horrible and useless officers of the House, you can start with the Liberal House Leader Chaggar who is rapidly becoming a parody figure rivaling her boss Dimples and her colleague Mixed Up Migrant Maryam Monsef as airheads and figures of fun repeating rote-like the same prepared spins and non-answers day after day.

No wonder The Clown Prince has fled to the doughnut shops.  He is badly bested daily in parliament and needs a stint in the minor leagues among ordinary Canadians who are more differential and easier to baffle with BS than experienced parliamentarians are.

Non-identity-attack