In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.
--------
Question: Comment: This article is somewhere between deceptive and fraudulent.
1)The first step in suing the state or any other entity is the FILING of the COMPLAINT and SERVING the defendant the COMPLAINT.  The state says they have not been served the complaint.  Therefore at this time no complaint has been filed.
The truth is, at best, is that the plaintiff is PREPARING to sue the state and I hardly find this to be any way news worthy!  Seriously WTF?

Answer: Non-sexual-explicit


Question: Comment: Ask yourself if the blacks and Hispanics are any better off for giving their votes to Democrats year after year?  Don't believe the polls for one second either.  You had best prepare to call in sick on November 9th since you will be too drunk to drive with all of your sorrow over President Trump's massive victory!

Answer: Non-sexual-explicit


Question: Comment: "exploit a woman". Hmmm, is having sex with a woman exploiting her? The verse is about lust, whose aim is sex. I see nothing in there about exploitation, since it takes two to make that happen. It isn't about rape. Isn't it true, Neko, that you believe that sex between a man and a woman is inherently exploitative? To wit, that coitus is a form of rape by men even if consensual? Isn't that what  your hardcore feminist thinks?

Answer:
Sexual-explicit