In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

Input: Consider Input: Comment: Its called anti-white racism.

Output: Identity-attack


Input: Consider Input: Comment: Your major premise was that one is morally permitted to act on whatever inclination he's born with.  Your minor was that gays are born with a sexual attraction for men, therefore . . .
Bad major.  That was the point.

Output: Identity-attack


Input: Consider Input: Comment: And Risqué put WOODWARD in caps in his post. But of course he is a liberal so that's OK. It's time to put our collective big boy pants on and to stop looking for reasons to be offended and upset. 2 years ago statues acknowledging a part of our very real history didn't hurt people's feelings. Even those in the Capitol that have been criticized weren't so bad when Obama was President and Pelosi was Speaker. But in a couple short years they became evil. The General Lee on The Dukes of Hazard didn't used to upset anyone except Roscoe. But almost overnight its signature Stars and Bars threw people in a panic. Otherwise respectable (I assume) made spectacles of themselves in ridiculous hats. Blacks riot-excuse me, 'protest', over a relatively small number of shootings of blacks by law enforcement, destroying neighborhoods and property, injuring people and blocking roads while ignoring the very real issue of black on black violence in any number of cities. Cowboy/girl up and deal with life.


Output: Identity-attack