In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Comment: The problem is really the accreditation of foreign trained physicians and specialists.     This has nothing to do with the current Govt and has existed for years.       

It's actually quite ridiculous that a foreign specialist educated and trained eg:  At the University of Edinburgh (unquestionably a top rated school), who did a foreign residency cannot practice in Canada unless they complete a Canadian residency.   But the number of residency positions is capped and many are taken by Canadians who studied abroad and returned to complete their residency in Canada.    Worse - when they complete their residency, they are free to leave, no strings attached.
Non-obscene

Comment: That's a nice story, except that it's not true.  I was very surprised when I heard Kershaw wasn't starting.  Like I said, Darvish looked like crap in game 3, and his eyes looked lost.  No way I would have started him in a game 7 with Kershaw available.  And again, the metrics on Darvish vs. the Astros are pretty astounding.  Frankly, I wouldn't even have put Darvish on the roster for the WS, given his history with the Astros.
Obscene

Comment: When we are going to talk about Islam making women second class citizens and throwing gays off buildings.

Non-obscene