In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence can be inferred from the statement. Incorrect choices change the meaning in important ways or have details that are not mentioned in the statement. Indicate your answer as 1,2, or 3 corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.

Input: Consider Input: Statement: All real little girls' dresses from the '20s to the '60s had been crotch-length. Choices:  1. All authentic little girls' dresses from the '20s to the '60s were floor length. 2. All authentic dresses for little girls from the '20s to the '60s were crotch-length.  3. It was not a problem that little girls' dresses from the '20s to the '60s were crotch-length because children were not yet sexualized the way they are now. 

Output: 2


Input: Consider Input: Statement: With respect to section 604(a)(2), the analysis issued with the final rule states that HCFA received no comments on the methodology used in its initial analysis. Choices:  1. The analysis issued with the final rule says the HCFA got 10,000 comments. 2. The analysis issued with the final rule says the HCFA didn't get any comments on the website. 3. The analysis issued with the final rule says the HCFA didn't get any comments.

Output: 3


Input: Consider Input: Statement: But in fact Boulaye had advocated supporting a party, meaning the Conservative Party. Choices:  1. Boulaye was a liberal and advocated their policies. 2. Boulaye was an advocate of supporting the Conservative Party. 3. Boulaye campaigned and lobbied for the Conservative Party.


Output: 2