In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Example Input: Comment: Yeah, that's what the homosexual activists call anything that disagrees with homosexual acts: bullying.  What's really bullying is sticking your penis in someone's anus.
Example Output: Sexual-explicit

Example Input: Comment: If the Democrats had any brains they would never "block" a Supreme Court nominee just based on ideology.  If they are not qualified that is one thing but if they are not a left winger that is nonsense.  Maybe the Republicans should then block any leftie from the court who is otherwise qualified.  This kind of stuff is what ruins our entire system and makes people not trust it at all.  We want good judges who are not buried in ideology but can rule on the facts and the law.  How hard is that?  Often, it is much easier than checking a potential ruling against a certain ideology.  Try it!
Example Output: Non-sexual-explicit

Example Input: Comment: Anita Thorne - A pervert, not a pathetic confused sexless idiot, but a  man on the sex fiend list looks forward to sharing your time together in the future in the restroom - and please bring your daughter, and her daughter.  And you can't keep him him out because he says he is a woman and you can't question that can you!  I have never seen so many naive people in my life.  And when the first 7 year is raped  in a restroom they will be crying the we caused it, not their stupid ideas of fairness.
Example Output:
Sexual-explicit