In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Input: Consider Input: Comment: PR was declared "bankrupt" due to $74B in Ponzi-scheme issued bonds and $50B+ in unfunded pension liabilities. With an annual GDP of $103B, and declining, PR was insolvent. PR tried to raise $9B to repair and replace it's failed electrical grid. Since PR was insolvent, they couldn't float bonds. 
The article stated, "Nearly two weeks after the storm, 93% of electricity customers remain without power, including some hospitals." This is the exact percentage lost after Maria. Yet any person who's worked with a municipal or state power grid understands there's always some redundancy stored and available. After a disaster, electrical power is restored to hospitals, shelters, critical buildings, etc. with those stored components. The fact PR Power & Electric has restored nothing? Not even a flicker of interim power? That's either gross incompetence by PR P&E or inaccurate reporting.

Output: Non-sexual-explicit


Input: Consider Input: Comment: Another christian tempted by the prospect of sex with other men....

must.  stop.  gaysex.

Output: Sexual-explicit


Input: Consider Input: Comment: NATO can only postulate when it comes to non-existent "threat" from Russia. They don't want to do anything to fight the real threat of terrorism. Hey, France, how about cleaning up the mess you made in Libya?


Output: Non-sexual-explicit