instruction:
In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.
question:
Comment: Correct  me if I am wrong, but following criticism in these comments, I no longer see the perp described as a "white man" in this story.

(However, he continues to be described as a"white man" in a related story here.)

Let me know whether I just missed the white descriptor on second reading.
answer:
Non-obscene


question:
Comment: Notice the DP isn't carrying the Donna Brazile story at all?  They do everything they can to keep the sheep in the blind.
answer:
Non-obscene


question:
Comment: Sorry, RCW, but the selective Twitter quote does not demonstrate racism except when taken out if its context, as the author most egregiously does in this case.  The ellipses come from an immediately prior tweet:  "...Such poor leadership ability by the Mayor of San Juan, and others in Puerto Rico, who are not able to get their workers to help.  They...".  The "them" in the quoted tweet is about the Mayor of SJ and her leadership team, not about Puerto Ricans, generally.  Prior to this, his tweet was that Democrats are pressuring the Mayor to tow the party line.  
Perhaps he is racist; he wouldn't be the first president to be so, either Republican or Democrat, but selective quoting like this makes those who make the racist claim look foolish or desperate.
answer:

Non-obscene