In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Input: Consider Input: Comment: The point is you have to START. Success is a HABIT. at some point you have to choose to do something beneficial to your long term goals. Even if it is only $5 a week. Skip a trip to 7-11, exercise some self control and self discipline.

Don't buy that pair of $200 air jordans. Go to wal mart and put that other $180 into something productive. How are your talking about "dignity" when people are blowing money on shoes and drugs, when their kids have no food to eat ?

We have a client in Waianae that uses some of the same arguments that you just did, DEMANDING her expectation of "dignity." This is the same woman that stands (pimps) her skinny 9 year old child on the corner near pizza hut and makes him hold a sign "hungry, need food."  People feel horrible and give the kid money. She promptly collects it as she needs to support her daily drug habit. Meanwhile the kid is sitting at our place not having eaten all day. Don't you preach to me about "dignity." My mom would kick her ass.

Output: Sexual-explicit


Input: Consider Input: Comment: He also evaluates infant girls on their potential breast size.

Output: Sexual-explicit


Input: Consider Input: Comment: "All" is not completely honest. "All so far" would be. But since the SCOTUS has agreed to hear the case, how a potential 5-4 vote might go is unknown. 
-
Besides, the issue is simple: He didn't refuse to serve a customer because the customer was gay, a neo-Nazi, Hillary Clinton, or a police officer (as some personnel at some restaurants have done). 
-
He simply refused to use his artistic talents to create a piece of "edible art work" that was offensive to him. In this case it was a "gay wedding cake" but even Hypocritical Liberals would admit he would be right to refuse to decorate a "black man being lynched" for a racist or a swastika cake foe a neo-Nazi......because the issue is not the "customer" but the issue is the "art work" being created.  
-
So the hypocrites are the liberals....who will gladly defend his right to decline to decorate cakes they find offensive, but will curse him for declining to decorate cakes they don't.


Output: Non-sexual-explicit