In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

Q: Sentence: Jane knocked on the door, and Susan answered it. She invited her to come out.
 Reason: The 'She' refers to jane because JANE REFER TO SUSAN. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

A: Wrong
****
Q: Sentence: I couldn't put the pot on the shelf because it was too tall.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the pot because as we're all aware of by now, the pot is a big issue in this game. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

A: Wrong
****
Q: Sentence: They broadcast an announcement, but a subway came into the  station and I couldn't hear over it .
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the subway because subway came into the station and I couldn't hear over it. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

A:
Correct
****