We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Example Input: Sent1: the use of the death penalty is an act of revenge which cannot be undone, so should the state be put on trial for putting to death an innocent person?
 Sent2: As of yet, we have not seen fact one that even one innocent person has been put to death.
Example Output: Not similar

Example Input: Sent1: I'm not saying that a child's life is worth more than an adults, I'm saying if they killed any one they forfeit their life, because they in return lose what they took from someone else.
 Sent2: Like I said, if the person isn't convicted, then they will not be murdered in the electric chair, or by lethal injection.
Example Output: Not similar

Example Input: Sent1: if it's murder then okay... the criminal deserves the death penalty.
 Sent2: Death penalty should be allowed for those who deserves it.
Example Output:
Similar