instruction:
We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.
question:
Sent1: If someone is bad enough to be considered for the death penalty then they must have had sure evidence that they are guilty if they are then they shouldn't deserve the right to live among people they could kill
 Sent2: When they are about to be shot just think what would be happening, some unlucky person would be dealing with the fact that they were going to have to take someone's life.
answer:
Not similar


question:
Sent1: I have evidence that says that innocent people are convicted of crimes.
 Sent2: The evidence is overwhelming that some death penalty opponents were stating that the 102, nationwide, were actually innocent people, who had no connection to the murders.
answer:
Similar


question:
Sent1: Life without parole lets you fix that mistake since they can be released if they are found innocent - not so with the death penalty.
 Sent2: You need to find lots more for the death penalty to save more lives than innocents that have been executed by it.
answer:

Not similar