In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

[EX Q]: Comment: Why would anyone "look into" something so ignorant, and easily proven wrong?
[EX A]: Non-obscene

[EX Q]: Comment: Correct - that is immense pain... Dude is tough as snot. He has one of the quickest releases in football and he throws an amazingly catchable pass. Paxton throws ducks worse than Manning did. Trevor has plenty of an arm. He will not lose this competition.
[EX A]: Non-obscene

[EX Q]: Comment: I had to chuckle at his remark "Phan states repeatedly, for example, that to acknowledge a complementary relationship between Christianity and other world religions is not to claim that the teachings of those religions are in any sense equivalent." Just ask the hierarchy about the complementary relationship between male and female.

At times they seem confused about the meaning of "confusion" -- it's not a synonym for "disagreement" or "theorizing" or "exploration" or "h*r*sy"; and "you're confused" should not be the beginning of a threat to put the hammer down.
[EX A]:
Non-obscene