In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

Q: Sentence: I stuck a pin through a carrot. When I pulled the pin out, it had a hole.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the carrot because They stabbed the carrot. Logically a hole would be left. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

A: Correct
****
Q: Sentence: Susan knows all about Ann's personal problems because she is indiscreet.
 Reason: The 'she' refers to ann because she is the only person who has been with Ann (of course) and she is the one who. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

A: Correct
****
Q: Sentence: The trophy doesn't fit into the brown suitcase because it is too small.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the suitcase because it is not the brown suitcase. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

A:
Wrong
****