We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

[EX Q]: Sent1: Although there is much controversy about him, I agree that prisons, especially for those for whom the death penalty could be considered, should be punishment.
 Sent2: The way I see it, capital punishment doesn't have to be expensive at all.
[EX A]: Not similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: People sentenced to life in prison shouldn't languish in cells, they should be doing something to aid the society they injured.
 Sent2: If the person in question is in prison, they are removed from society.
[EX A]: Not similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: If we execute death penalty, we will not be better than murderers.
 Sent2: If Europeans don't like the fact that we execute mass murderers in the US, then they'd better not come to the US to become a mass murderer.
[EX A]:
Not similar