In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Ex Input:
Comment: I'm sure it was a set-up.  You know how those Dems are.  /s

Ex Output:
Non-sexual-explicit


Ex Input:
Comment: RadirD, Kim Jung Un and the DPRK regime threaten us all the time.  Why would Trump or any other rational person use that as a line in the sand?  It took them a few hours after his asinine statement to threaten us yet again.  Foolish.

The only person who yells out "I'm going to punch you in the face!" is a coward who doesn't actually want a fistfight (like Kim Jong Un).  A serious person would just slam you in the kisser without warning.

Don't get me wrong, the DPRK is a growing and serious threat and there may not be a way out of a conflict at this point.  They have been seriously mishandled and underestimated by every president (both GOP and Dems) since the Korean war.

Ex Output:
Non-sexual-explicit


Ex Input:
Comment: It is well past time for a world wide tourism boycott of the USA.  Trump was voted in by the citizens of the USA.  That means Trump is their chosen representative.  Republicans hold both the Congress and the Senate so don't try to tell me that Trump because he did not win the popular vote he is not the choice of USA citizens.  Citizens of the USA have the right to choose a a vagina grabbing President but must accept the consequence that foreign tourists find that choice to be repulsive.

Ex Output:

Sexual-explicit