We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

[EX Q]: Sent1: Gun control does nothing to make anyone safer or save lives.
 Sent2: Less gun control probably means more criminals will have guns, however it also means more civilian lives will be saved.
[EX A]: Not similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: You still have to prove that gun control equals crime control and your admission that it does not is proof that it is about control and dependency on government to protect you when they have no obligation to do so.
 Sent2: If anything, cops will come to where you live to take your guns, seeing as they work for the government.
[EX A]: Not similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: THey also believe that ALL guns can XXXX people apart and even an untrained person with a gun can shoot as accurately as the military.
 Sent2: Guns don't kill people, people kill people: absolutely true, but guns allow people to kill people with greater efficiency, which is not necessarily a good thing outside of the battlefield.
[EX A]:
Not similar