We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Example Input: Sent1: Again, I support the death penalty for certain crimes and criminals.
 Sent2: I do not support the death penalty - but it's not because I feel bad for criminals.
Example Output: Not similar

Example Input: Sent1: The question with the death penalty is not kill or give no punishment.
 Sent2: The death penalty again, in giving punishing the offender sends out a message to others that no one should kill or hurt another person which will thus serve to deter other potential killers.
Example Output: Not similar

Example Input: Sent1: If you're arguing for a general principle (eg that Capital punishment is acceptible and effective) then you have to argue in the general case:
 Sent2: So, in summary, you aren't against the death penalty on principle.
Example Output:
Not similar