In this task, you are given the abstract of a research paper. Your task is to generate a summary of this abstract. Your summary should not be very short, but it's better if it's not more than 30 words.

[EX Q]: This work addresses the long-standing problem of robust event localization in the presence of temporally of misaligned labels in the training data. We propose a novel versatile loss function that generalizes a number of training regimes from standard fully-supervised cross-entropy to count-based weakly-supervised learning. Unlike classical models which are constrained to strictly fit the annotations during training, our soft localization learning approach relaxes the reliance on the exact position of labels instead. Training with this new loss function exhibits strong robustness to temporal misalignment of labels, thus alleviating the burden of precise annotation of temporal sequences. We demonstrate state-of-the-art performance against standard benchmarks in a number of challenging experiments and further show that robustness to label noise is not achieved at the expense of raw performance.
[EX A]: This work introduces a novel loss function for the robust training of temporal localization DNN in the presence of misaligned labels.

[EX Q]: A framework for efficient Bayesian inference in probabilistic programs is introduced by embedding a sampler inside a variational posterior approximation. Its strength lies in both ease of implementation and automatically tuning sampler parameters to speed up mixing time. Several strategies to approximate the evidence lower bound (ELBO) computation are introduced, including a rewriting of the ELBO objective. Experimental evidence is shown by performing experiments on an unconditional VAE on density estimation tasks; solving an influence diagram in a high-dimensional space with a conditional variational autoencoder (cVAE) as a deep Bayes classifier; and state-space models for time-series data.
[EX A]: We embed SG-MCMC samplers inside a variational approximation

[EX Q]: We consider the question of how to assess generative adversarial networks, in particular with respect to whether or not they generalise beyond memorising the training data. We propose a simple procedure for assessing generative adversarial network performance based on a principled consideration of what the actual goal of generalisation is. Our approach involves using a test set to estimate the Wasserstein distance between the generative distribution produced by our procedure, and the underlying data distribution. We use this procedure to assess the performance of several modern generative adversarial network architectures. We find that this procedure is sensitive to the choice of ground metric on the underlying data space, and suggest a choice of ground metric that substantially improves performance.   We finally suggest that attending to the ground metric used in Wasserstein generative adversarial network training may be fruitful, and outline a concrete pathway towards doing so.
[EX A]:
Assess whether or not your GAN is actually doing something other than memorizing the training data.