In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Example Input: Comment: They still do not  like  them dam Yankees in the South so much ado about noting.   I just whish I had toe money to move to NC for common sense and other reasons ( I am tired of the leftist coast).
Example Output: Non-sexual-explicit

Example Input: Comment: *arse
Example Output: Sexual-explicit

Example Input: Comment: "[Corporate executives'] interest is hardly surprising, as it has become clear just how much money there is to be made.."

Yes, and let's just focus on the cash. It is genuinely astonishing to see Mj rehabilitated in the corporate media, from black market gangster phenom, to squeaky-clean, appropriate object of corporate fetishization in less than a year. Once all that troubling Hell's Angels grime has been wiped away, we are treated to an endless line-up of corporate executives chuckling about how much opportunity there is in MJ. And how are we, the readers of this dross, supposed to differentiate between the confusing semiotics of criminal and corporate Mj producer?
Example Output:
Non-sexual-explicit