We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

[EX Q]: Sent1: If it must be, then we shall find a way to improve these peoples habits, not kill them because they aren't 'like us'.
 Sent2: When a person does something horrible, we no longer see them as a human that values their life, we just see them as an epitome of hate.
[EX A]: Not similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: So, the only reason I can really see why people support the death penalty is to have simple vengeance against the perpretrator.
 Sent2: Deterrence is not the only reason I support the death penalty.
[EX A]: Not similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: Well I think that if someone commits a crime worthy of the death penalty they should get a sentence for life that way they can't be a repeat offender.
 Sent2: Only if they try to murder somebody after they are in prison do they deserve the death penalty?
[EX A]:
Not similar