We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.
--------
Question: Sent1: In Silveira v. Lockyer the 9th Circuit Court ruled that California's Assault Weapons Control Act is not unconstitutional and that the second amendment does not protect an individual right.
 Sent2: Somebody challenged California's assault weapons ban and the court ruled the ban is not unconstitutional because there is no individual right to keep and bear arms.

Answer: Similar


Question: Sent1: Gun registration schemes have been disabled for criminals because requiring them to register a gun they are forbidden to own would violate their 5th Amendment rights.
 Sent2: If England wants to ban weapons, that is quite alright, but we should not trade with htem as long as they are violating the human rights of their citizens.

Answer: Not similar


Question: Sent1: I believe that some of my gun control friends know in their hearts they are unable to debunk the overwhelming historical evidence which proves the Second Amendment was intended to recognize an individual right.
 Sent2: The language and historical intent of the Second Amendment mandates recognition of the individual right to keep and bear firearms and other personal weapons.

Answer:
Similar