In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

[EX Q]: Comment: Zuma fires competent ministers but retains incompetenet lying ministers such as Dlamini. She should be fired as a minister and taken out of Parliament, as she makes a mockery of the institution. One wonders why she is allowed to act as she does-unilaterally. The other question that should be asked is whether she has paid the court costs and show proof that the payment was out of her own pocket
[EX A]: Non-sexual-explicit

[EX Q]: Comment: Yeah, but the real anology, is that  you borrow about 10% of a business start-up, and then have to pay 20% of all SALES ( not profits ) for 34 years, for that 10%.

No business would be this dumb.
In many ways, she is acting like trump with China.
[EX A]: Non-sexual-explicit

[EX Q]: Comment: The voters in this country have SPOKEN very DECISIVELY, Bye, Bye, Good riddance   Hillary & Billy,  Do not let the door hit you in the Arse on your way out.
[EX A]:
Sexual-explicit