Categorize the comment on the basis of toxicity. If the comment is toxic (harmful, malicious, derogatory, threat, insult, identity attck, etc.) output Yes, otherwise output No.

Input: Consider Input: Most of the ones I review are. Makes sense anyway to judge content rather than the name.

Output: No


Input: Consider Input: Didn't see blazo's comment until after. Yeah and the same could be said to bring pot into the argument. Imagine the difference you'd see at international soccer games if marijuana was served instead of beer. I'm wagering you wouldn't see soccer riots. Ok, heroin. Or oxycontin. Have you heard of people being stabbed shot robbed burgled etc for money to buy these drugs? All the time? Marijuana. How often does someone get robbed for pot money? Only in extremely rare circumstances where the idiot was already very mentally ill.

Output: Yes


Input: Consider Input: At a flat $60k, online tax bracket estimators for federal and Oregon taxes combined (with no deductions at all, which is unlikely) result in a little over $17k in taxes, leaving you with a net of $43k.

$43k/12 months = a little over $3,500/mo.

Your 50/30/20 breakdown results in $1,790 for necessities.

$1,075-ish can go towards "financial obligations."

$716 can go towards "personal choices," meaning your "personal choices" budget is about $24/day.

A truly wonderful, self-reflective follow up article would be a daily "personal choices" diary of how this author (and maybe some volunteer friends) spend their money.  Is she or the average Portlander being responsible in only spending 20% of their net income on "personal choices," and thus justified in complaining about the rest of the equation and state of affairs in Portland proper?  Inquiring minds would *love* to know!


Output: No