In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.
--------
Question: Comment: Trid sees nothing wrong with "No Dogs or Jews", "We don't serve Muslims" and so on. He supports bigotry. And no, that is NOT a straw man, but the clear and obvious implication of your " If either the buyer or the seller does not want to enter into that contract for whatever reason then I believe they have the right to refuse." Thank you for proving that your claim to being a Christian is a complete sham.

Answer: Non-sexual-explicit


Question: Comment: Yes, whatever precedent or wording or function that can be found, to remove Meredith from the Senate - a man few Canadians consider worthy of dignity or respect. Men like him, with financial power and connections, who groom teen aged girls for sex, are a dime a dozen in Canada. The Senate risks wide perception of total uselessness if Meredith remains.

Answer: Non-sexual-explicit


Question: Comment: Bwa hahaha liberals reported Justins own words as uncivil.  Cant stop laughing...here lets repost what Justin said.


“The small minority, angry, frustrated group of racists don’t get to define who we are as a country, don’t get to tell others who we are and don’t get to change the nature of the open, accepting values that make us who we are,” Trudeau said
Oh dear....

Answer:
Non-sexual-explicit