In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

Ex Input:
Comment: PM Trudeau and his Liberals in Canada don't seem to care if Canadian-made armoured vehicles are shipped to Sunni Saudi Arabia and used to suppress, kill and injure Shia and other Muslim protesters.

So what's the problem?

Ex Output:
Identity-attack


Ex Input:
Comment: This Hitler argument is stale...arming people with military style weapons not only supports the crazy, it reflects our inability to understand why the vast majority of police favor the reasonable regulation of firearms ownership. They would also like to see regulation ammunition that's relates to the ability to kill them regulated. None of this minimal regulation would limit your freedoms...Canada has resonance gun regulations, Australia bans a number of styles of weaponry...they they both seem okay. The difference? Fewer gun deaths, fewer crazies with arms, and a clearer commitment to community safety. It's your children, our police, the neighbor down the street that desires reasonable consideration.

Ex Output:
Non-identity-attack


Ex Input:
Comment: >> I do think, though, that all schools should teach comparative religion on an historical basis
.
May be let's start with history first. Seems even teaching children REAL history is beyond the capacity of the school boards who are always up for over-the- top-politically-correct curriculum nonsense.

Ex Output:

Non-identity-attack