The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.

Example Input: Context: 'Maybe I could take 2 firewood 2 food and 0 waters?' 'I was planning on staying up all night and keeping my fire going all night.  Honestly I could give you all the extra food if that helps you if I could please have the 3 firewood?  We could split the waters' 'I'll only give you all the firewood if you give me everything else. I know it's your top priority😮'
Utterance: 'How about I take all the wood, give you all the food, you can have 2 waters and I can have one.  Having a little extra water will help me with all the hiking we will be doing, plus since i wont be eating much I want to stay hydrated.  Will that work for you>>🙂'
Example Output: No

Example Input: Context: 'Hello, how are you today?' 'hello, I am good, I am very excited about this trip. how are you?' 'i am great, super excited about camping as well, are there any supplies that you really need?'
Utterance: 'i really need water and food. we did not get enough of those.'
Example Output: Yes

Example Input: Context: 'Hello hope you are excited for the trip Im hoping we can discuss the supplies. I would like to get 2 water 1 food and 2 of the firewood '
Utterance: 'I can give you 2 waters and 1 food, but I really need more firewood. I ran out last time and I don't want to go through that again! How about you take 2 waters, 1 food, and 1 firewood? '
Example Output:
No