Categorize the comment on the basis of obscenity. If the comment is obscene output Yes, otherwise output No.

At more than one of the private enterprises I worked at we had a few folks that made well past 100K a year as well.  That was a product of a job few wanted to bid into, a work force that was under staffed and a 24X7X365 operation.  I came close to that figure in 1979 due to a combo of those factors plus an added managerial bungle of bidding a contract way under the true cost.  Finally, anyone can put their nose to the grindstone and go after those jobs.  If they have what it takes.  Good luck with that.
No

Ummmm, in light of recent events, the struggle is still very real for the Queer community ESPECIALLY Queer folks of color and trans women of color. Keeping our spaces safe from assholes like you who don't think safety is a priority for queer people must definitely be written about.  Please sit down and shut the fuck up.
Yes

No, Martin. You quite clearly stated that you were offended that people similarly situated to your grandfather viewed his music as "speaking to something authentic". You are implying that it is YOU who determines what is or is not authentic - and since you have determined that his music does NOT speak to something authentic, you are offended that those people who DO think it speaks to something authentic exist at all. 

It's very confusing to try to sort through, because it requires two wildly irrational assumptions. First is that Springsteen's heart, mind, and soul have been irrevocably damaged by the acquisition of money to the point he can not empathize with the very class of people he spent his entire life surrounded by, and is no longer capable of sincerity about those issues and experiences. The second is that somehow YOU have a sense of what is and is not authentic which surpasses both his AND his fans, who despite your claims, come from all walks of life, all over the globe.

No