In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Input: Consider Input: Comment: With a lot of Anchorage now stoned on pot , pills , and booze---with free unearned cash to pay for it all thanks to the PFD-----it's little wonder they think life is wonderful here. With a full PFD check Anchorage might have jumped up the charts to number one . Today's Alaskan's don't face life head on . They have to use drugs to get by.  Shame on us all for celebrating our drug culture .

Output: Non-sexual-explicit


Input: Consider Input: Comment: Right Steve, because the McGuinty, Butts, Wynne's "green" plan is paying off in spades... the Ontario Liberals are a national embarrassment, they have no credibility and their "green" plan has turned out to be an absolute failure. Canadians who actually work for a living understand this, the smug limousine liberals who will be protected by fat golden pensions couldn't care less about rising costs of living and weaker economic competitiveness, it's not going to have any material impact on Wynne's ability to sip daiquiris in Cabo. This new tax will hurt working Canadians with higher living expenses and less economic opportunity.Trudeau operates with a smug sense of unearned entitlement, he lives in a cushioned dream of puff and ignorance. Butts sewered Ontario and now he wants to double down with the same incompetent policies on the rest of Canada.

Output: Non-sexual-explicit


Input: Consider Input: Comment: Most in the hierarchy prefer their penises alive and attached to a young and very handsome man.


Output: Sexual-explicit