We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

[Q]: Sent1: If it must be, then we shall find a way to improve these peoples habits, not kill them because they aren't 'like us'.
 Sent2: save the money...feed starving children and free this "bad guy"...let the families find them...kill him for us for free!
[A]: Not similar


[Q]: Sent1: My final point is, whether you believe in the afterlife or whether you think once we're dead this is it, do you not think death is the least punishing form of punishment?
 Sent2: If you think there shouldn't be a death penalty, you're an idiot.
[A]: Not similar


[Q]: Sent1: OK Jim, how can you disagree with my use of the word deterrent and turn around and say "I think the death penalty is a detergent.
 Sent2: If you read my arguments clearly you would understand that i said capital punishment if used more often will deter crime.
[A]:
Similar