We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Ex Input:
Sent1: It dealt with an individual right and further indentified the limits of that right to be certain that the RKBA provision would not be construed to protect the carrying of concealed weapons.
 Sent2: Well, owning handguns for personal home protection is different that carrying guns in a concealed fashion for protection.

Ex Output:
Not similar


Ex Input:
Sent1: While many guns are taken off the street when people are arrested and any firearms in their possession are confiscated, a new study shows how easily arrestees believe they could illegally acquire another firearm.
 Sent2: As I think some people who wuv their guns would just XXXX the ignorant politician away with their newly illegal gun.

Ex Output:
Not similar


Ex Input:
Sent1: Gun ban = No civilians can protect themselves using a firearm = Criminals can illegally purchase guns, like tons already do.
 Sent2: Do not ban guns when guns are the tools of man.

Ex Output:

Not similar