TASK DEFINITION: In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence can be inferred from the statement. Incorrect choices change the meaning in important ways or have details that are not mentioned in the statement. Indicate your answer as 1,2, or 3 corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.
PROBLEM: Statement: He decided that Tuppence, in the throes of anxiety, had gone to the police, and that his disappearance having been made public the gang had not been slow to put two and two together. Choices:  1. The gang was after him for stealing their jewels and they thought that he was still missing.  2. He thought that Tuppence, being full of angst, went to law enforcement and that public knowledge of the fact that he was missing made public the group didn't put the two facts together.  3. Tuppence was content and lacked worry and didn't leave the house. 

SOLUTION: 2

PROBLEM: Statement: The thundering Republican condemnations of the special prosecutor back then are just like the thundering Democratic condemnations today, down to the very phrase, four years and $40 million. Choices:  1. The thundering Republic condemnations back then are similar in many ways to the thundering Democratic condemnations of today.  2. The thundering Republican condemnations are in no way similar to the thundering Democratic condemnations. 3. The thundering Republican condemnations are four years and $40 million. 

SOLUTION: 3

PROBLEM: Statement: The bandwidth to end all bandwidth comes to you from another despicable monopoly , your local cable guy. Choices:  1. The bandwidth we have is never enough. 2. Cable companies have a gross monopoly. 3. You can only get bandwidth from the power company.

SOLUTION:
2