In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

Q: Comment: Trolling again, Trid?  Sad.

A: Non-identity-attack
****
Q: Comment: Why is that going to be a problem? White man laws are great at creating criminals in jail houses whereas tribal justice is hard, fierce and stops it dead on. Leave the people alone and quit setting them back with white ways! It's none of anyone's business! Keep your jailhouse friend, the people don't have use for them. And the next time white people want to cry a river about the hardships of tribal justice do everyone a favor and look the other way.

A: Identity-attack
****
Q: Comment: You're using the trad argument that gay people don't exist?    If that works for you, fine, but we both know that gay people do exist, that the John Jay report says 15 to 51 percent of priests are gay, and that Bishop Accountability tells us that 80% of the abuse cases were male priests raping boys.

By the way, "neoconservative" is a political term that applies to international affairs, and not social issues related to gender studies.

A:
Identity-attack
****