The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.

[Q]: Context: 
Utterance: 'I'd like to have 2 extra packages of water and firewood.'
[A]: No


[Q]: Context: 'Tell me, how stocked up are you on food and firewood?' 'I have firewood, what I need mainly is water, then food' 'Ah, I see. I have plenty of firewood as well but mostly need food and some water.'
Utterance: 'so let me suggest a split, I get two water and two food, you get one food, one water and three firewood'
[A]: No


[Q]: Context: 'no that won't work.  I will give you 3 food and 1 water.  I will take 3 wood and 2 waters.' 'I did not know you wanted water. Ok, that's great so I will take all 3 extra packages of food.As for the water I would like 2 waters because my dog is coming along with us for our trip and extra water for him will be needed.' 'i think i should have 2 waters because i will need to put the fire out to protect the forest.'
Utterance: 'Well, if we can't settle on an agreement i'm going to walk away. We agreed I will get all 3 extra packages of the food but I still wish for the 2 extra wood and 2 extra waters'
[A]:
No