We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

[Q]: Sent1: While criminal trials not involving the death penalty can also involve mistakes, there is at least the opportunity for those mistakes to be corrected.
 Sent2: That should be a crime which should result in the death penalty.
[A]: Not similar


[Q]: Sent1: I used to be for the death penalty, however two things made me question my position.
 Sent2: I think the death penalty should only be used in extreme cases where the accused is, without a doubt, guilty.
[A]: Not similar


[Q]: Sent1: And what message would your widow deliver to your daughter when she explains how the family of the rapist you killed took THEIR revenge by killing you?emoticonXBanghead
 Sent2: So you hurry home, and upon your arrival the police inform you that your daughter, the one who was raped, was found raped and murdered and we have the rapist/killer in custody.
[A]:
Not similar