Given a document, an entity and its sentiment towards the entity, verify if it is the correct sentiment towards the entity. Answer should be yes or no. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].
--------
Question: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Kelly Gallivan is Neutral . It was October.  Kelly Gallivan   68  remembers seeing the Amazon box addressed to  her  husband sitting outside their Acton  Massachusetts  house.  She  brought it inside  opened it and unwrapped the "techy gizmo stuff."
"What did you order this for?"  she  remembers asking  her  70-year-old husband.
But  Mike Gallivan  hadn't ordered them. It was easy for the couple to forget about the puzzling package - until many others started arriving.
More than 20 boxes have been sent to the house  all addressed to  Mike Gallivan   none containing the sender's name or invoices or receipts. The gadgets have started piling in a corner of their house: Phone chargers  USB cords  an outdoor TV plastic cover  a computer vacuum cleaner  a humidifier powered by a USB  a Bluetooth speaker  tent lamps  high-intensity flashlights  a rechargeable dog collar. The most recent one came last Thursday   Kelly Gallivan  said.
"At first it was kind of weird. Then kind of funny. Then kind of creepy  " Kelly Gallivan  said. "We don't want this stuff. Some of it's trash  some it's pretty good stuff. But we just don't want this stuff and its just an uncomfortable feeling that we keep getting these things."
The Gallivans aren't sure how much longer they'll keep receiving the packages. Some items have been well-received - Mike Gallivan said he plans to use the high-intensity flashlight and a pair of Bluetooth headphones. Other gadgets  like a "little gizmo you put around your cellphone that lights up the area when you want to take your selfie " Kelly Gallivan said  will likely be donated.

Answer: yes


Question: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Larry Wooten is Neutral . Navarroâs decision apparently was a reflection on federal officials. It follows release of a memo by  BLM investigator Larry Wooten  that described âa widespread pattern of bad judgment  lack of discipline  incredible bias  unprofessionalism and misconduct  as well as likely policy  ethical and legal violations among senior and supervisory staffâ in the BLMâs Office of Law Enforcement and Security.
 Wooten  wrote that  he  had seen âexcessive force â described officers grinding Bundyâs son Daveâs face in gravel and opined that federal officials were intent on commanding âthe most intrusive  oppressive  large scale and militaristic cattle impound possible.â
In an apparently partisan reference that used a term Hillary Clinton designated for some of Trumpâs supporters   Wooten  wrote that a federal prosecutor said  letâs get these âshall we say Deplorables.â
 Wooten  also wrote that the Bundy case âclosely mirrorsâ the circumstances behind the trial of former Sen. Ted Stevens  R-Alaska.
 Wooten  is no fan of Cliven Bundy who   he  wrote  instead of âproperly using the court system or other avenues to properly address  his  grievances   he  chose an illegal  uncivilized and dangerous strategy in which a tragedy was narrowly and thankfully avoided.â

Answer: yes


Question: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Sarah Huckabee Sanders is Positive . Sarah Huckabee Sanders  lied about baking a chocolate pecan pie for Thanksgiving. The White House press secretary further ruined the national holiday by humiliating the press corps by asking them why they are grateful. While none of this is true   attacking Sanders  personally has become the media’s latest and lowest method of attacking President Trump.
“Piegate” started after  Sanders  shared a picture on Thursday of a chocolate pecan pie with the caption   “I dont cook much these days  but managed this Chocolate Pecan Pie for Thanksgiving at the family farm!” April Ryan  the American Urban Radio Networks correspondent and a CNN political analyst  tweeted at  Sanders  the next day: “Show it to us on a table.” She then added  “I am not trying to be funny but folks are already saying #piegate and #fakepie Show it to us on the table with folks eating it and a pic of you cooking it.” Ryan’s insinuation that  Sanders  used a stock photo launched a viral debate involving every nook and cranny of the crust and glazed pecan top of the pie.
 Sanders  responded to the second tweet with grace: “Don’t worry @AprilDRyan because I’m nice I’ll bake one for  you  next week ;-) #RealPie #FakeNews.”
Ryan’s fake news was so influential that other liberal media kept the rolling pin going. On Saturday  MSNBC’s Joy Reid  said she “cannot verify whether or not  Sanders  baked that pie.” Did anyone at MSNBC call the White House and ask? Fox News’s Todd Stearns did  and  Sanders  told him  “Of course I made the pie.” She added that  “I make it for every holiday family gathering and have for years.”
 Sanders  was also attacked for asking reporters  in a pre-Thanksgiving briefing  to state what they were thankful for before asking their questions.  Sanders  started by saying she was thankful for  among other things  the people in the room  her faith and family. Reporters almost all responded in kind  which gave the usually antagonistic briefing room a kinder atmosphere.
 Sanders  is a practicing Christian  who prays before she does the daily briefing  so one would think she would be given the benefit of the doubt in understanding this as a good-will effort to transcend partisanship.
Piling on  his colleague Kathleen Parker said  Sanders ’s request was “candy-coating her usual condescension with faux fellowship.” Parker used the rest of her column to criticize every aspect of  Sanders ’s professional skills and recommended that she be replaced with — naturally — a journalist.
The Thanksgiving nastiness wasn’t even the lowest the media sank in its attacks on  Sanders .
Earlier this month  Los Angeles Times writer David Horsey began his piece: “ Sarah Huckabee Sanders  does not look like the kind of woman Donald Trump would choose as  his  chief spokesperson.”  He  went on to say  she  “looks more like a slightly chunky soccer mom who organizes snacks for the kids’ games.”
The backlash to this piece  especially the reference to  Sanders ’s weight  was so swift that the Times deleted all of it from the column and added an apology from the author. This is not standard procedure in newspapers. The as-written text normally stays in the piece  unless factually incorrect. There’s no way the Times did this because it cares about Trump supporters. It cares about female readership. And we don’t like men judging our weight and appearance at work.
The media hostility toward  Sanders  really has nothing to do with her but stems from its barely concealed hatred for Trump. So they want a Trump spokesperson to perform badly. But  Sanders  is effective in the way she does not give an inch in defense of the president  while keeping her cool and appearing unfazed. That means she gives the media few sound bites to nourish liberal cable shows and late-night television. She ducks and dodges when needed  which is part of the job.
 Sanders  has thick skin and a strong faith. None of these personal attacks appear to get to her  no matter how low and mean. She knows her purpose is to defend and promote the policies of the president and the administration. At some point  the elite pundit class in the media will realize that in attacking  Sanders   they are the ones who end up looking bad.

Answer:
yes