instruction:
The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.
question:
Context: 'I feel for firewood we dont need as much, as we are going to be camping, with that means, in my opinion, with branches and brush available, maybe we can take 2 fire woods, what do you think?' 'Since I got some food already, can I get 3 water, 2 firewood and 0 food then?' 'can we do at least one food? if thats okay with you? I would like to have extra food in case something happens, i will be able to have the extra supplies. '
Utterance: 'ok, so list out the amount you need'
answer:
No


question:
Context: 'Ok, so I like water a lot.' 'Yes, water is a necessity for being out camping 🙂'
Utterance: 'I agree.'
answer:
No


question:
Context: 'That's a good reason! I don't run, but could use some water. ' 'How much were you thinking? I could also use some food, but really don't have much need for firewood.' 'How about we split? 2 water for you, and 1 for us, that way we can go on a fun hike. In exchange, could we also have all the firewood? We want to have a community fire and you're more than welcome!'
Utterance: 'So 2 waters for me, 1 for you, and all the fire wood. How about the food? Perhaps 1 for me and 2 for you? Sound reasonable?'
answer:

No