In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Ex Input:
Comment: RadirD, Kim Jung Un and the DPRK regime threaten us all the time.  Why would Trump or any other rational person use that as a line in the sand?  It took them a few hours after his asinine statement to threaten us yet again.  Foolish.

The only person who yells out "I'm going to punch you in the face!" is a coward who doesn't actually want a fistfight (like Kim Jong Un).  A serious person would just slam you in the kisser without warning.

Don't get me wrong, the DPRK is a growing and serious threat and there may not be a way out of a conflict at this point.  They have been seriously mishandled and underestimated by every president (both GOP and Dems) since the Korean war.

Ex Output:
Non-sexual-explicit


Ex Input:
Comment: Stephen Paddock was not a "responsible gun owner," he was a mass murderer. Since you brought up death toll, perhaps you already forgot about the Islamic extremist who killed 84 people in Nice, France last year by running them over with a rented truck?

Ex Output:
Non-sexual-explicit


Ex Input:
Comment: Limited increases, my butt. Taxes have gone up every year. 1000s of homes have been built in the valley.  If the borough bozos would quit spending on ill thought out programs, there would be plenty of cash.

Ex Output:

Sexual-explicit