In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine the neutral choice based on your inference from the statement and your commonsense knowledge. The neutral choice is a sentence that neither agrees nor disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3', corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence. If sentence X agrees with sentence Y, one's correctness follows from the other one. If sentence X disagrees with sentence Y, they can not be correct at the same time.

Input: Consider Input: Statement: i that would have been stupid and i don't and i don't think we did it everything else we handled in this seemed to be perfectly right i don't think they would have done that Choices: 1. I have a list of better alternatives we could have taken. 2. I don't see any other way we could have handled that. 3. That would have been a senseless thing for them to do.

Output: 2


Input: Consider Input: Statement: The LSC declares in its brief, and respondents do not deny, that under these provisions the LSC can sponsor neither challenges to nor defenses of existing welfare reform law, Brief for Petitioner in No. Choices: 1. They had full power in the welfare reform laws. 2. They were upset they could not do what they want. 3. They were not able to challenge the reform laws.

Output: 2


Input: Consider Input: Statement: A study in the 1980s, in fact, found that four out of every five tender offers resulted in the target being absorbed by one firm or another. Choices: 1. In a study of 1990 it has been found out that a vast majority of tender offers resulted in the target being absorbed by one firm or another. 2. In a study of 1990 it has been found out that a vast majority of tender offers resulted in the target being absorbed by one firm or another, but now the situation has changed.  3. In a study of 2010 it has been found out that a vast majority of tender offers resulted in the target being absorbed by one firm or another.


Output: 2