In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Example Input: Comment: As a one more I ask you and others to type "Study links low intelligence and low I Q., to conservatism and prejudice". And think of what is making you and others angry. I see angry voters voted in more of the same, and kept getting b.s.'d into voting for more of the same for a few election cycles. Now the same angry voters are really mad and are going to vote for another snake oil salesman who'll really finish the job the angry voters are raising hell about. What's that saying about being able to fool some people some of the time? With some it is all of the time.
Example Output: Non-obscene

Example Input: Comment: When will the fans know when the “social issues” have satisfactorily been addressed so the nonsense kneeling stops? How will that be measured?
Example Output: Non-obscene

Example Input: Comment: You're full of shit, Wegmann. Antifa and BLM went there with premeditated violence in mind and initiated it. Your article is as credible as Pickett's charge was successful - minus the objectivity.
Example Output:
Obscene