TASK DEFINITION: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.
PROBLEM: Comment: Yeah, I'e been living with this issue for most of my life. I'm happy to keep it alive.

There's no question that men who make sexual overtures from a position of power commit an abuse of power. And yes, it's exactly these blurry lines that become problematic.

When I was quite young (I may even have been a minor) I had a boss who got sexual with me when we were alone in a room. I rebuffed him, and he was a gentleman about it. I was really annoyed, but I continued to work at that job for a while. Was it an abuse of power? Yes. Was it a crime? Actually, legally it may have been. But I don't think of it as a crime. Women used to experience this kind of stuff all the time. I'd like to think the culture has changed a bit since then.

Unfortunately, as you may remember, I have also been a rape victim. So I give women who claim they've been raped the benefit of the doubt. But...at times, it's not the truth.

SOLUTION: Sexual-explicit

PROBLEM: Comment: You are truly a pessimist! I know you don't like "Pocahontas" or Chuck Schumer, but either would be a better administrator than Trump, who doesn't seem to be getting the picture. I could be wrong, but I don't think Pence has national appeal.

SOLUTION: Non-sexual-explicit

PROBLEM: Comment: Ever wonder why 90% of the staff at Pearson are Muslim? From food workers in the departure concourse cafeteria , the janitors, ground crew, information kiosk, parking attendants. Even the food in the cafeteria is now halal.

SOLUTION:
Non-sexual-explicit