In this task, you're given reviews from Amazon's food products and a summary of that review. Your task is to classify whether the given summary matches the original review. Generate "True" if the given review and its summary match, otherwise generate "False".

Q: Reviews: The eggs are an odd size; not as big as "normal" plastic eggs and not the size of mini eggs. The print on the eggs was washed out and faded to the point that I cannot use them for my intended purpose - an Easter egg hunt. Maybe they are useable as decoration. Very disappointed. I had to replace them. 
 Summary: Hot Pink is not the right description it is more like magenta or a dark pink

A: False
****
Q: Reviews: This plastic on this product cracked and rendered the mill totally useless within 2 months (1 stick of butter was grated). The point of fault was the plastic rim surrounding the grating plate, when twisting the piece back on, it cracked along one of the anchor tabs meant to hold the plate in place. Overall this is a clever idea, but too shoddy to recommend to others. 
 Summary: Non-stick surface durability is average to poor. Temp maintenance is poor

A: False
****
Q: Reviews: The suction was good, however when I place the device in the water (already below desired temp) heater light turns on briefly, then does not heat. I’ve tested many times, but always does not heat water at all. May be a dud. 
 Summary: I think I could have liked this book if the story were told in third ...

A:
False
****