instruction:
We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gay Marriage)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.
question:
Sent1: Now a gay man may not wish to marry a gay woman (or vice versa) but the government does not inherently prohibit marriage between gay persons.
 Sent2: Having the "right" to marry someone we don't want to marry is no right at all.
answer:
Not similar


question:
Sent1: The difference between a homosexual marriage and a heterosexual marriage(besides the fact that animals were meant to be paired heterosexually) is that GAY COUPLES CANNOT PROCREATE" at one point.
 Sent2: Marriage is by definition between a man and a woman, and no one else, and the states interest is in a procreative type relationship, a gay couple does not entitle to these benefits.
answer:
Similar


question:
Sent1: It IS valid to challenge the constitutionality (with Constitution A) of an anti-gay marriage LAW by arguing gay marriage is a constitutionally protected right.
 Sent2: It is NONSENSICAL to challenge the constitutionality (with Constitution B) of an anti-gay marriage AMENDMENT by arguing gay marriage is a constitutionally protected right without acknowledging that the constitution HAS CHANGED to say it isn't a right.
answer:

Similar