In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence can be inferred from the statement. Incorrect choices change the meaning in important ways or have details that are not mentioned in the statement. Indicate your answer as 1,2, or 3 corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.

Q: Statement: According to the Rochester team, the findings suggest that our language-learning abilities may have to do with our general cognitive prowess, not with any particular language module. Choices:  1. There's a language module that aids us in our ability to learn a new language. 2. The team at Rochester doesn't have any ideas concerning the basis of learning new languages. 3. A person's general intelligence may be related to the ability to learn a new language according to the team from Rochester.

A: 3
****
Q: Statement: However, a 60 day period was afforded for comments to be submitted on the interim rules, which period was reopened on August 7, 1995 and extended to August 18, 1995. Choices:  1. There was an additional 11 day period for comments on the rules. 2. There was no additional comment period after the initial 60 day one. 3. The interim rules were temporary rules for fence building.

A: 1
****
Q: Statement:  Nonoperating costs, such as payments made to the Treasury for retroactive charges are excluded. Choices:  1. Including nonoperating costs would muddle up the data. 2. Nonoperating costs aren't excluded. 3. Payments made retroactively to the Treasury don't count.

A:
3
****