We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

[EX Q]: Sent1: If today we were to ban guns all the law abiding citizens would give up their firearms and protection.
 Sent2: where gun control laws prohibit good law abiding citizens from carrying a gun to protect themselves and others.
[EX A]: Not similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: We don't have to choose between total regulation of guns or total denial of the problem of gun crime.
 Sent2: We have guns and we still have crime and lots of gun deaths.
[EX A]: Not similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: IF you want them armed, why not let law abiding citizens who have passed a background check, a firearms safety check, and a marksmanship test carry their guns?
 Sent2: Gun hater pilot's lack of logic is to not allow law abding citizens the right to bear arms, and do nothing to protect the unarmed law abiding citizens.
[EX A]:
Not similar