In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

Q: Comment: Are you kidding me. Trans gender bathroom bill, westboro, god hates fags, attempting to pint gays as pedophiles, painting gays as the cause of the aids epidemic, and constantly judging everyone through a very negative lens has been the religious rights mode of attack.

Then you dare come on here and again attack people that call out intolerance. It is not intolerance to point out hate, and your side peddles in hate of everything they didn't like.

Your side has spent years shouting down and name calling anyone that doesn't agree, then you come here and blame the other side. Par for the course, I guess.

Party of Personal Responsibility or is it Party of Her Emails now?

A: Identity-attack
****
Q: Comment: So gay lives don't matter to the black lives matter crowd? Seems rude to take attention away from the main event. And why would anyone want to honor someone who confronted police with a knife?

All that said, Seattle has many parades, as do many other faraway cities. Not sure why this one warrants RG attention.

A: Identity-attack
****
Q: Comment: Vice President Cheney advocated bombing NK during the Bush years, but he was labeled a warmonger by the progressives, press and even some on the right, to the point that Bush basically told him he was crazy and sidelined him. Their relationship never recovered.
I don't know if the consequences of attacking NK back then would have been less, but at least NK would not be threatening the world now with working nukes.

A:
Non-identity-attack
****