In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

[Q]: Comment: The guy had beendrinking downstairs in the pub. He was being daft, not spying.
[A]: Non-obscene


[Q]: Comment: Taking Billions of Dollars out of the CBR to keep the lights on we lose $166,000,000 in future investment income. Because the GOP super majority cannot, will not for re-election purposes, come up with a plan to fix the fiscal mess the state goes further and further into deficit spending mode. Contrary to what Mr. Herz says in his otherwise stellar reporting  on Juneau it is the subsidies of $600,000,000 to the oil industry that effects the states budget as much as a restructuring of the PFD would do. I'm  in favor of seeing the PFD restructured but not until SB21 is revised, the "new oil" clause is struck and the subsidies  permanently repealed. The Governor presented a balanced plan of revenue increases and substantial spending cuts that were ignored by the legislature. As for Chenault and Meyer saying the lege is at an impasse therefore nothing can be done until the next regular session I call BS. What will be different in Jan. versus now? Just do the damn job you were elected to do.
[A]: Obscene


[Q]: Comment: I'm a little torn but feel the need to nudge a little of my support towards Washingtons AG.  AND his office.  I AM one of those that did not and still cannot approve the actions against Our President.  Anyone can see if they look deep enough into ANY government action, at any level something that is not either 1) legal, 2) ethical or 3) functional.  Finding a way of supporting those in difficult positions above you in government should always be a priority.  Not, spewing crap on them because you don't like them or something they are doing that you can find fault with.  I will say that the AG of Washington does not get the same intelligence briefings of the President of the United States.  All that said, I think He Really truly tries to fulfill the requirements of his job AND keep Washingtonians informed of what he is doing and tries to listen at all levels.  I think he goes above and beyond his job requirements.  Thanks You :)
[A]:
Non-obscene