In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Comment: While the childs life is very important however your argument about Medevac @ OMC is so spot on!  I value them trees.  people forget just how much we do need trees to live.  Its not about being 'tree huggers'  its just plain freaking common sense.  Top the damn things.
Obscene

Comment: i was done when krapadik took a knee i took a knee against the america hating felons on the nfl watch college football if you have to no politics and if they start this crap they will be done also
Obscene

Comment: "It does seem a little hypocritical for Dogwood to be complaining about Kinder Morgan playing a role in the B.C. election through its donations to the BC Liberals, when it is receiving money from the United States to fight for causes aligned with interests there. "
In one case, foreign interests donate money to advocacy groups.
In the other, foreign interests donate money to a political party whose members currently form the provincial government. 
Not even remotely equivalent, Gary, and tf. hardly hypocritical of Dogwood to complain about it.

Non-obscene