instruction:
In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine the neutral choice based on your inference from the statement and your commonsense knowledge. The neutral choice is a sentence that neither agrees nor disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3', corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence. If sentence X agrees with sentence Y, one's correctness follows from the other one. If sentence X disagrees with sentence Y, they can not be correct at the same time.
question:
Statement: Why not just abolish all the laws that are supposed to protect These folk; because if you do not have legal services, the laws are unenforceable and useless. Choices: 1. These folk need legal services to protect them. 2. There is no way to enforce the laws with no legal services. 3. The people can protect themselves against the law.
answer:
1


question:
Statement: i that would have been stupid and i don't and i don't think we did it everything else we handled in this seemed to be perfectly right i don't think they would have done that Choices: 1. I have a list of better alternatives we could have taken. 2. I don't see any other way we could have handled that. 3. That would have been a senseless thing for them to do.
answer:
2


question:
Statement: The proposal in the Postal Service's petition would have established Negotiated Service Agreements as a new form of mail classification, with individual agreements to be reviewed by the Commission within 60 days. Choices: 1. The Postal Service's petition makes a new mail classification. 2. The Postal Service's petition eliminates a mail classification. 3. The Postal Service's petition makes a new mail classification for bulk mail
answer:

3