We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

[EX Q]: Sent1: The fact that you like cars is why you will tolerate the fact that more kids are killed by cars then guns.
 Sent2: people who want to kill, will kill if you ban guns, they will kill with knives, or something else.
[EX A]: Not similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: The only case you could possibly make is more accidents with more guns at gun shows.
 Sent2: The fact that you've committed murder is irrelevant and the only thing that matters is if a person has a gun?
[EX A]: Not similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: You still have to prove that gun control equals crime control and your admission that it does not is proof that it is about control and dependency on government to protect you when they have no obligation to do so.
 Sent2: Should guns be controlled, that would give people the right to demand that you surrender your weapons, just as the state currently demends that you hand over all terrorists, drugs and illegal material.
[EX A]:
Not similar