We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

Q: A law-abiding gun nut who uses their gun in committing a crime, is a criminal, and not law-abiding.

A: Valid
****
Q: Isn't the right to bear arms carved in the Constitution tablets that Jefferson brought down from Capitol Hill?

A: Valid
****
Q: Firearm trace data does not meet the burden of proof necessary to support the claim that federally licensed dealer #579248 sold multiple firearms to criminals in a deliberate and willful manner in blatant defiance of the set laws.

A:
Valid
****