Categorize the comment on the basis of toxicity. If the comment is toxic (harmful, malicious, derogatory, threat, insult, identity attck, etc.) output Yes, otherwise output No.

Example Input: did the RG forget to print a story?   I thought the Chelsea gorrow vacation pics yesterday...tweeting - ridiculous.  ridiculous.  inane.  ridiculous.  if I wanted to see her on vacation, i would follow Chelsea on her facebook page.....  ****I know who mark baker is, but do I have to see his face every day?  with the same 2 months old, 4 stories a month? and the same awful pic that has him looking like the guy you report to the police for hanging out by a school.  to be clear - not saying mark baker is that person - i'm sure he is not - but if we have to see a pic...maybe his DMV pic?
Example Output: Yes

Example Input: Chris perhaps she is not "vested" in the community and has no desire to be. Just perhaps. Possibly she just wants to live somewhere different for a few years to have a different experience. That seems quite acceptable to me. Ah but that might sound shallow to some....
Example Output: No

Example Input: repeating the same babbling nonsense doesn't make it fact, it shows a lack of intelligence. It isn't an issue of prediction. Your argument is deluded straw. Furthermore it's in print and you still fail to follow the discussion. I advocate teaching algebra as an elective, not remove it entirely from the curriculum as you ignorantly post. furthermore you run like a coward from the facts I referenced as to how this is causing a dropout problem, a fact your delusions refuse to accept.
Example Output:
Yes