In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: threat and non-threat. Threat is a statement that someone will be hurt or harmed, especially if the person does not do something in particular.

[EX Q]: Comment: What a mega waste of borrowed money! All Trudeau needed to do was talk to former PM Jean Chretien on the airplane about it. We all remember how Chretien killed the GST. He is the expert. Harper actually kept more promises. Stupid ones like the gun registry and wheat board come to mind. The GST is something Trudeau never promised to touch, but the party owes us closure. It would actually help get the economy back to abolish GST and cancel some obsolete programs like the RRSP disaster. 

With Carbon taxes planned, the GST promise Chretien made could finally be honoured. Why do they call politician honourable when they're not?
[EX A]: Non-threat

[EX Q]: Comment: I am all for your proposal to let people invest their SS. However, if they go broke, I don't want to save them. Let them die in the street. Right? And none of that socialized emergency care. Lock the doors if they don't have money. I mean, anyone who misjudges investments deserves to die, right?
[EX A]: Threat

[EX Q]: Comment: Well they are breaking the law, so under a Trump regime I could see it happening...and of course since they are hiding brown people his ostensibly "christian " base would cheer him on.
[EX A]:
Non-threat