We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.
--------
Question: When the point that someone on death row was saved by DNA is brought up, it shows that system works because it has saved their life.

Answer: Valid


Question: there is no evidence of people intentionally visiting another in a dream, though claims have been made.

Answer: Invalid


Question: A child is more likely to drown in a backyard pool than be killed playing with a firearm but we do not consider banning backyard pools because they are somewhat less easy to demagogue.

Answer:
Invalid