In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence can be inferred from the statement. Incorrect choices change the meaning in important ways or have details that are not mentioned in the statement. Indicate your answer as 1,2, or 3 corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.

[Q]: Statement: Participants raised questions about whether the SEC should reconsider the amount and targeting of its civil sanctions and more frequently use other types of remedies, such as criminal sanctions, to hold people accountable for wrongdoing. Choices:  1. Participants believe candles will be a great remedy for criminals. 2. Participants asked questions about different ways to hold criminals accountable for wrongdoing.  3. Participants asked many questions about the death penalty. 
[A]: 2


[Q]: Statement: However, a 60 day period was afforded for comments to be submitted on the interim rules, which period was reopened on August 7, 1995 and extended to August 18, 1995. Choices:  1. There was an additional 11 day period for comments on the rules. 2. There was no additional comment period after the initial 60 day one. 3. The interim rules were temporary rules for fence building.
[A]: 1


[Q]: Statement: i did have more time and i tried to spend some more time with them and uh you know we did things as a family we went camping quite a bit and we uh you know took trips went to see my folks in Florida and and some of those kind of things Choices:  1. I decided to use the extra time I had to spend with family because I had neglected them in the past. 2. I was always busy and never had the opportunity to spend time with my family or even see my parents. 3. I possessed more time and attempted to give more time to do activities as a family such as camping and traveling to Florida for my parents.
[A]:
3