In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

[EX Q]: Comment: Are you stupid? It said  most influential in "east coast hiphop"
Fucking idiot
[EX A]: Obscene

[EX Q]: Comment: Without going through the legal channels to change how the pay out is done, this is flat out illegal. 

So instead of local businesses and citizens infusing and stimulating OUR economy, he wants to pour 700M into a bucket with holess in it.

Blatant thievery. Gov. Walker.

You shame the office of Govenor and Alaska. You are guilty of HURTING the innocent and poor and taking that which does not belong to you to take.
[EX A]: Non-obscene

[EX Q]: Comment: I think in all fairness that before the Liberals end omnibus bills for good, they should have the opportunity to try one out for their political advantage. They have a lot of ground to make up after the disastrous Harper years, and Conservative complaints are falling on my deaf ears.

It is understandable that some Liberals may be miffed, but all things considered, a responsible government should not really make a concerted effort to get rid of a policy vehicle until they road-test it.

I do hope all the parties learn a lesson from this. If you don't want omnibus bills, don't present omnibus bills. If Trudeau did not present one here, the Conservatives would have no idea how horrible they are when you are in opposition. 

Clearly I like this government, and I'm willing to pardon their many apparent inconsistencies, up to a point. They are a long way from that, so I'll heave a contented sigh amidst the wailing and moaning from past champions of omnibus bills.
[EX A]:
Non-obscene