Given a document and an entity the task is to select the author's sentiment towards the entity. Sentiments can be Positive, Neutral and Negative. Select Positive if the article expresses a positive view towards the given entity or praises its quality or skills. Select Neutral if the document expresses no clear view towards the entity or has equal amounts of positive and negative statements or expressing some fact/quote by someone else. Select Negative if the article expresses a negative view towards like harsh remarks, criticizing entities action/decision etc. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

[EX Q]: What is the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Richard Thaler ? The winner of this year's Nobel Prize in economics says  he 's "nervous" about stocks.
"We seem to be living in the riskiest moment of our lives  and yet the stock market seems to be napping  " Richard Thaler  who won the prize for his contributions to behavioral economics   told Bloomberg TV on Tuesday. "I admit to not understanding it."
"I donât know about you  but Iâm nervous  and it seems like when investors are nervous  theyâre prone to being spooked "  he  said  adding that "nothing seems to spook the market."
 Thaler  was awarded the 2017 Sveriges Riksbank Prize in Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel on Monday.
[EX A]: Neutral

[EX Q]: What is the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Mitt Romney ? Former presidential candidate Mitt Romney blamed the government for the wildfires burning through California and other Western states Thursday morning . 
-- Mitt Romney -LRB- @MittRomney -RRB- October 12 , 2017 . 
"Uncontrolled fires , loss of lives & property = failure of prime govt responsibility , underinvestment in helos , planes , personnel , systems ," Romney tweeted .
[EX A]: Negative

[EX Q]: What is the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Phillips ? Jack Phillips  proprietor  of Masterpiece Cakeshop  refused to create a wedding cake ordered for a same-sex marriage on grounds that it would force  him  to create a cake expressing a value opposed to  his  Christian convictions. The gay men who ordered the cake filed a sexual orientation discrimination claim against  him  with the Colorado Civil Rights Commission  and the Commission ruled against  Phillips .
It was clear that this was not a matter of  Phillips  refusing to do business with these men because they are gay.  He  offered to make them any cake they wanted  just not one designed for a same-sex wedding.
 Phillips  claims  his  right of free expression under the Constitution's First Amendment.
Some not sympathetic to  Phillips ' claim argue that making a cake is not artistic expression and has nothing to do with speech protected by the First Amendment.
By this standard  how can we possibly rationalize forcing  Phillips  to produce a cake against  his  will  expressing a value anathema to  his  religion?
How can forcing  Phillips  to do this be understood in any way as securing for  him  "the blessings of liberty"?
[EX A]:
Neutral