We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Input: Consider Input: The non-repeat offenders are typically people who committed much smaller crimes that would never be worthy of the death penalty in the first place.

Output: Valid


Input: Consider Input: After all, absence of brain activity is considered legally dead in the medical field, so the start of brain activity should be the requirement for them to be legally alive.

Output: Invalid


Input: Consider Input: We can't have one without the other, in fact we can't have one without all of them.


Output: Invalid