In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Ex Input:
Comment: Sigh ... sadly evoking a some commenters here on the R-G site who define every new Donald Trump revelation as simply losers whining about the results of the last election, I have to say, as the feces continues to move into the fan with the power and consistency of a conveyor belt, that (damn) if ever there was an agenda this country needed, it was the politics of Bernie Sanders. Reform systems skewed for the wealthiest 1%, reform the worst health care system in the developed nations, reform the economics of higher education, and do what we can to halt the human damage to our planet. Hindsight and all that; and (damn) I didn't even vote for him in the primary.

Ex Output:
Obscene


Ex Input:
Comment: As the title of the editorial says “the reactions are revealing”....some really ugly crap being spouted here by the good ol boys.

Ex Output:
Obscene


Ex Input:
Comment: It certainly wouldn't be difficult for healthcare providers to establish a set price for procedures that took contingency circumstances into account.  The Oklahoma Surgery Center does just that to account for potential emergencies that might take place during operations, for example, and there are certain cash-only doctors who list their prices.  
As you point out, there is a parasitic relationship between providers and insurance companies, but honestly this is an issue that could easily be solved with existing anti-monopoly legislation.  The contention that a whole new law like the ACA and a wide-ranging bureaucracy to implement it was needed was fallacious from the beginning, and the GOP's proposed law just keeps the charade alive.

Ex Output:

Non-obscene