We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Example Input: Sent1: what you are saying is that we should murder people because the prisons are overcrowded.
 Sent2: Hitler killed a whole race, you are basically saying you don't mind if we kill a bunch of innocent people as long as we get guilty people as well.
Example Output: Not similar

Example Input: Sent1: So if we can assume that innocent people are convicted in capital punishment cases, shouldn't we be free to assume that innocent people are being convicted in non-capital punishment cases as well?
 Sent2: Many, many people have already been exonerated AFTER being convicted of a capital crime.
Example Output: Not similar

Example Input: Sent1: I KNOW IT COSTS A LOT TO KEEP AN INMATE IN PRISON.
 Sent2: I just think that if all non-volent offenders were out of jail then we'd have A LOT more room.
Example Output:
Not similar