Given a document, an entity and its sentiment towards the entity, verify if it is the correct sentiment towards the entity. Answer should be yes or no. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

Example Input: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Adam Schiff is Neutral . On Jan. 23  Californians  Adam Schiff  and Dianne Feinstein  respectively the ranking member of the House Intelligence Committee and a member of the Senate Intelligence Committee  sent a letter to Twitter demanding an explanation for the surge on the site of tweets bearing the hashtag #ReleaseTheMemo  a reference to a controversial Republican memo that alleges Justice Department impropriety in the FBI's Trump-Russia probe.
Twitter sent  Schiff  and Feinstein its response late Friday evening. Representatives for the two legislators declined Monday and Tuesday to share the letter  and it's unclear if it will ever be released. Twitter declined to release the letter on its own.
 Schiff  and Feinsteinâs concern had compared the role of Russian botnets in the #ReleaseTheMemo campaign to the malign role of Russian trolls in spreading false news during the 2016 election.
"If these reports are accurate  we are witnessing an ongoing attack by the Russian government through Kremlin-linked social media actors directly acting to intervene and influence our democratic process â  Schiff and Feinstein  said in their letter to Twitter. âThis latest example of Russian interference is in keeping with Moscow's concerted  covert  and continuing campaign to manipulate American public opinion and erode trust in our law enforcement and intelligence institutions.â
Example Output: yes

Example Input: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Zach LaVineSteve Kerr is Positive . Summarizing the stereotypes   Zach LaVine  was a risk  coming off surgery to repair  his  left ACL. Kris Dunn was a bust  a broken-down shell of a former lottery pick. And Lauri Markkanen was an unknown  a soft European headed the way of Andrea Bargnani.
“ Zach  is going to be terrific ” Thibodeau said in an interview last July at the Vegas Summer League. “ He ’s a great worker.  He  puts a lot into it.  He  has made great strides each year. And  he ’ll continue to because of the way  he  approaches things.
 LaVine  made  his  debut Saturday — albeit on a 20-minute limit — look about as effortless as one could after an 11-month layoff. That’s testament not only to  LaVine ’s work ethic and skill but  his  athleticism.
“ He  gives you the ability at the end of the shot clock when you don't have anything to just rise up and freeze a defender and make a shot with a high degree of difficulty ” coach Fred Hoiberg said. “That's a skill  obviously  that you have to have at this level. Zach  at times  makes the game look very easy.”
Example Output: no

Example Input: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Scott Atran is Neutral . IS IT correct to find parallels between violent white supremacism and neo-Nazism on one hand  and the nihilist fury of ultra-militant Islam on the other? A Franco-American scholar   Scott Atran   is convinced that these deadly phenomena are two sides of the same coin. Unless people grasp that point   he  thinks  our ability to cope with either scourge may be limited.
Of course there are superficial resemblances which anyone can see. In August  when a fanatic drove his car into a group of liberal  anti-racist protesters in Charlottesville  Virginia   he  was copying a tactic that had already been used by self-styled warriors for Islam in at least four European countries.
But Mr Atran  who holds academic posts in Britain  France and America  sees deeper resemblances.  He  makes the point in an essay for Aeon   a forum for elaborate intellectual arguments  drawing on a series of  his  own academic investigations.
In  his  view  both kinds of fanaticism reflect both the failure of the liberal democratic order to inspire anyone to defend it  and the insidious attractiveness of ideologies which challenge that order. What makes these ideologies appealing is not their content but the strong collective identity they offer. They create peer groups that promise their own members such admiration that it can seem like sufficient reason to lay down oneâs life. By contrast  surveys suggest that very few people  these days  feel inclined to give up their lives for democracy.
Example Output:
yes