We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

Input: Consider Input: In the fifteen years following the passage of Florida's concealed carry law in 1987, over 800,000 permits to carry firearms were issued to people in the state.

Output: Valid


Input: Consider Input: How about you bring an actual debate to the table for once instead of resorting to cheap, underhanded, inflammatory stupidity that contributes nothing and just brings down the average for gun haters everywhere.

Output: Valid


Input: Consider Input: There's absolutely no evidence in existence that when the Founding Fathers wrote and ratified the Second Amendment, that they were anticipating the need to quell negro rebellions.


Output: Valid