Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.

[EX Q]: Probably just out for a quick spin.
My dog used to do that all the time.
[EX A]: Yes

[EX Q]: Rich,white people can't soil their hands by actually handing a $20 bill to a homeless person..They have to buy a "designer" cake from another,rich,white person,have them hand the money to a charity,and then have the charity buy the homeless person a meal (after taking a 50% cut of the donation,of course)..LOL
[EX A]: Yes

[EX Q]: No need to get nasty about it. My point is that the fact that they serve unrelated purposes can explain how it is they get placed close together. Honestly, I don't really understand how this is a problem -- but then I have personal pet peeves that few others share as well.
[EX A]:
No