In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence can be inferred from the statement. Incorrect choices change the meaning in important ways or have details that are not mentioned in the statement. Indicate your answer as 1,2, or 3 corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.

Input: Consider Input: Statement: The leaks suggest to our NATO allies that the U.S. military isn't seriously engaged in the operation. Choices:  1. Based on the leaked information the U.S. military does not seem to be taking the operation seriously enough. 2. Leaks suggest that the US is engaged in the operation.  3. The U.S. military intended to reveal this information in due time.

Output: 1


Input: Consider Input: Statement: For example, we looked at the efforts of four agencies (the Departments of Agriculture, Health and Human Services, Interior, and Veterans Affairs) to both improve services and reduce staffing levels in their personnel offices through the better application of information technology. Choices:  1. Four agencies attempted to use information technologies to improve services. 2. Increasing staffing levels through the better application of information technology was one of the objectives. 3. Four agencies appreciated the impact modern information technology to such a degree that they advised other agencies to also make changes.

Output: 1


Input: Consider Input: Statement: It is also a surprisingly attractive sadly, a relative rarity among Japan's bland, homogenous cities. Choices:  1. Most cities in Japan are the same thing. 2. Japan typically has uniform, boring cities. 3. The city was the typical bland Japanese city.


Output: 2