In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

[Q]: Comment: So who is going to be put in charge of waking up the homeless and having them tear down their tents? Parking lot attendants? The police? How long is it going to take until homeless advocates go in there with cameras recording the homeless getting waken up and being told to move out, then complain about how inhumane it is to force them to move? Who is going to front the insurance claims when peoples' vehicles inevitably get broken into? The city (*cough* taxpayers *cough*)? Or will they just deny that it was due to the homeless camp they created and it was just a "random act"? Where are these people going to go to the bathroom? Where are their dogs going to go to the bathroom? They already defecate all up in the stairwells, this will just make it much worse. Is the city going to spend the extra money for custodial cleaning of all the stairwells every morning so commuters paying to park don't have to avoid piss and crap on their way to work?
[A]: Non-sexual-explicit


[Q]: Comment: Stephen Paddock was not a "responsible gun owner," he was a mass murderer. Since you brought up death toll, perhaps you already forgot about the Islamic extremist who killed 84 people in Nice, France last year by running them over with a rented truck?
[A]: Non-sexual-explicit


[Q]: Comment: Ms. Wilde: I hope you're kidding. Quite obviously, Mr. Weinstein is a sexual predator. If he were just power-hungry, he'd not have had sex as his objective. Rape and sexual harassment primarily are about sex: forcing a person of less power to accede to an unwanted act. To some women, I can understand how this mistake can be made, but a mistake it is. If it were just about power, he'd have them bow down or kiss his shoes or wash his car.
[A]:
Sexual-explicit