Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.

Input: Consider Input: The expressed problems seem small potatoes.  What should be a big problem is getting City Counsel to approve 24 million dollars for an inadequate glass outhouse ( my view of  the plans I have seen) sitting on the corner of the ghost of an award winning building ( I am in need of anger management about this issue).

Output: No


Input: Consider Input: This offering to Alaskans could sunset after 2 (two) years which should give ample time for distribution.   The State could continue selling 1 million acres per year for (4) four years thereafter to others elsewhere who want to invest or make Alaska their home.   Alaska would realize at average $2,500.00 per acre sale, amounting to 2.5 Billion in the first/second years; qualifying the use of the other half of the Permanent Fund earnings by Alaskans with the pass through.   Revenue over the next 4(four) years could, at minimum, generate a total of 12.5 BILLION or more for use to cover a portion of the States Operational Budget.

Output: No


Input: Consider Input: The national and state guard need to go to this place and help them pack up and follow them to the border. If they come back every single one of them need to be arrested and charged for trespassing on Federal property.


Output: No