The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the self-need strategy, otherwise output No. self-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to create a personal need for an item in the negotiation, such as by pointing out that the participant sweats a lot to show preference towards water packages.

[EX Q]: Context: 'Hello - I would love be able to split some supplies with you🙂. I could use some extra firewood so maybe i could take 3 and maybe you could have some extra food? ' 'Maybe I could take 2 firewood 2 food and 0 waters?' 'I was planning on staying up all night and keeping my fire going all night.  Honestly I could give you all the extra food if that helps you if I could please have the 3 firewood?  We could split the waters'
Utterance: 'I'll only give you all the firewood if you give me everything else. I know it's your top priority😮'
[EX A]: No

[EX Q]: Context: 'Hmmm.  And the firewood?' 'I get cold easily. I need the firewood to get warm. I might catch a cold.🙂' 'I think water should be your priority.  You have food and firewood also in your basics.  I will let you have the 3 water but I will need the 3 Firewood and the 3 Food.  I have a medical condition.'
Utterance: 'Okay that works well. I accept! 🙂'
[EX A]: No

[EX Q]: Context: 'Hello How is preparing for your trip going?' 'Hi! I've made some mistakes so I need some extra supplies. ☹️ Which item do you need the most?'
Utterance: 'I need water the most we are campin  in arizona how about you'
[EX A]:
Yes