Given a document and an entity the task is to select the author's sentiment towards the entity. Sentiments can be Positive, Neutral and Negative. Select Positive if the article expresses a positive view towards the given entity or praises its quality or skills. Select Neutral if the document expresses no clear view towards the entity or has equal amounts of positive and negative statements or expressing some fact/quote by someone else. Select Negative if the article expresses a negative view towards like harsh remarks, criticizing entities action/decision etc. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].
--------
Question: What is the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Darren Woods ? Exxon Mobil Chairman and CEO Darren Woods  made the announcement in a blog post on Monday (full text below).
"At ExxonMobil   we  plan to invest more than $50 billion over the next five years to expand  our  business in the United States " writes  Woods . "These investments are underpinned by the unique strengths of our company and enhanced by the historic tax reform recently signed into law."
 Woods  notes the Exxon is not alone in its plans to reinvest in America and American workers in response to the massive corporate tax cut  which Republicans slashed from 35% to 21%.
 Woods  goes on to detail ways  his  company will invest those tens of billions in the U.S.:

Answer: Positive


Question: What is the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Hillary Clinton ? Former secretary of  state Hillary Clinton  speaks to and meets voters in Allendale  Mich.  on Nov. 7  2016. (Melina Mara/The Washington Post)
How do you write a primal scream? Because my head is about to explode over the story about alleged sexual harassment on  Hillary Clintonâs  2008 presidential campaign and  her  appallingly mild response  then and now.
To recap  while we were still reeling from the report that President Trump ordered the firing of special counsel Robert S. Mueller III last summer  the New York Times posted this: âHillary Clinton Chose to Shield a Top Adviser Accused of Harassment in 2008.â
According to the Timesâ Maggie Haberman and Amy Chozick  Burns Strider   Clintonâs  faith adviser â yes  faith adviser  you canât make this stuff up â was accused of repeatedly sexually harassing a young woman with whom he shared a campaign office. The Times: â She  told a campaign official that Mr. Strider had rubbed  her  shoulders inappropriately  kissed  her  on the forehead and sent  her  a string of suggestive emails.â
The campaignâs response? Campaign manager Patti Solis Doyle recommended that Strider be fired. So did Jess OâConnell  the national director of operations  who handled the investigation. And  Clinton  herself? Not so much  apparently. The young woman  not identified in the story  was moved to a different job. Strider â then married  by the way â was âdocked several weeks of pay and ordered to undergo counseling.â Which  predictably  he never attended.
And  even more predictably  when he was hired years later to oversee an independent group backing  Clintonâs  second presidential campaign  âHe was fired after several months for workplace issues  including allegations that he harassed a young female aide  according to three people close to Correct the Recordâs management.â
This is head-exploding stuff  but thereâs worse to come. Because now â now  after Harvey Weinstein and #MeToo and Roy Moore â this was Hillary Clintonâs belated response  in its bland totality: âA story appeared today about something that happened in 2008. I was dismayed when it occurred  but was heartened the young woman came forward  was heard  and had her concerns taken seriously and addressed.â
And classically  infuriatingly  this episode and its aftermath exposes  once again  the trademark Clinton failure to take personal responsibility; the allergy to owning up to error; the refusal to cede any ground  no less apologize; the incessant double-standarding  with different  more forgiving rules for the Clintons and their loyalists. Imagine a Hillary Clinton who said something like this:
Imagine that Hillary Clinton. She doesnât exist.

Answer: Negative


Question: What is the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Anne Milgram Anne ? About  Anne Milgram 's TED Talk
As New Jersey Attorney General   Anne Milgram  transformed the most dangerous city in her state. She changed a criminal justice system based on gut and instinct to one supported by data and statistics.
About  Anne Milgram 
 Anne Milgram  is a Professor of Practice and Distinguished Scholar in Residence at New York University School of Law. At NYU   Milgram  is building a Criminal Justice Innovation Lab  focused on using data and technology to transform the criminal justice system.

Answer:
Positive