TASK DEFINITION: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.
PROBLEM: Comment: Right, mildmannered, as the past is the future. Don't you wonder why the police haven't stopped all crime from happening based on criminal background checks and the past? You've vetted minimum-wage library book shelvers more carefully? That's because you're a stone-cold cretin.

SOLUTION: Non-identity-attack

PROBLEM: Comment: Staggering for sure.  But I've seen this with CIBC before.  At some point comes the crash and burn.

SOLUTION: Non-identity-attack

PROBLEM: Comment: Your logical fallacy is false equivalency. If I signed a contract  (and I do quite often in my job), and reneged on it, I can be taken to court.

I also don't believe every word of the bible. Scary, huh.

SOLUTION:
Non-identity-attack