TASK DEFINITION: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.
PROBLEM: Comment: FUCK CU

SOLUTION: Obscene

PROBLEM: Comment: I guess you'd call me a liberal because I tend to favor governmental intervention when "private" behaviors pose serious risks to others.  In this case, however, I swing to the Right.  Assuming that Mr. Jarlstrom's primary "transgression" was to write that he knew something about "engineering" (a generic term), the Board's crusade against him is inane., to say the least.  That would be like me (a retired political scientist) being fined for  illegally "practicing law" because I teach a course in mediation as an effective legal tool.  The case against Mr. Jarlstrom appears to be utter nonsense.  Perhaps one should attack Board members for their lack of proper qualifications.

SOLUTION: Non-obscene

PROBLEM: Comment: The difference between the narcissistic  'Tru twins' is: 

One is the boss that took over the company. He may be maniacally deranged, and makes it up as he goes along but he is still the boss.

The other is an employee/mascot with a pleasant enough demeanor and has the good sense to realize that the good vibes he feels in the room decline the more he opens his mouth....just stick with the script, and this play/show/movie will have a long run...

SOLUTION:
Non-obscene