We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Q: Sent1: In fact, gun control laws have been around for over 200 years so apparently the founding fathers didn't see the second amendment as a barrier to such laws.
 Sent2: The second amendment was included in the constitution as insurance against a time when it is not so unlikely.

A: Not similar
****
Q: Sent1: We should protect gun laws because of crazy people who go out of control with them and guns these days are getting more advanced and easier to get
 Sent2: If it was just a gun thing then they could go from internation flights from countries with no guns, but it isn't.

A: Not similar
****
Q: Sent1: Are you saying that the only reason there are criminals armed with guns is because we're not willing to accept gun prohibitions as the answer?
 Sent2: So...you want laws dictating everything we can do with a gun...but when the laws spell out that we can't drink while armed, you're claiming that nobody will obey the law and drink anyway?

A:
Not similar
****