In this task, you're given a statement, and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence clearly disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3' corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.

[EX Q]: Statement: Left to decide what part of the 1996 Act to strike as invalid, the court concluded that congressional intent regarding severability was unclear. Choices:  1. It was decided that the intent of severability was quite clear. 2. As a result, the court left the 1996 Act as it was originally written. 3. The court was able to decide which parts, if any, of the 1996 Act were invalid.
[EX A]: 1

[EX Q]: Statement: FHWA appraises senior executives on their achievement towards all the performance objectives in their individual plans. Choices:  1. FHWA appraises senior executives for achieving their goals in their individual plans. 2. FHWA don't appraise senior executives as that gives them grounds for a raise. 3. The achievements further grow the senior executives portfolio whilst allowing the company to grow even bigger!
[EX A]: 2

[EX Q]: Statement: The mean value of avoiding one statistical death (i.e. Choices:  1. The mean value of avoiding a statistical death is 5% 2. The mean average of killing someone. 3. The value of avoiding a death.
[EX A]:
2