Given a document and an entity the task is to select the author's sentiment towards the entity. Sentiments can be Positive, Neutral and Negative. Select Positive if the article expresses a positive view towards the given entity or praises its quality or skills. Select Neutral if the document expresses no clear view towards the entity or has equal amounts of positive and negative statements or expressing some fact/quote by someone else. Select Negative if the article expresses a negative view towards like harsh remarks, criticizing entities action/decision etc. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

Ex Input:
What is the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Eric Dickerson ? Monday on Fox Sports 1âs âUndisputed â NFL Hall of Famer and Fox Sports  1 analyst Eric Dickerson  took aim at the NCAA amid reports that prominent college basketball teams have been paying players.
âThe NCAA  theyâre the biggest hypocrites of all because this has been going on for decades  even before I started playing football  basketball â  Dickerson  explained. â[The] NCAA exploits not just black kids  white kids  Asian kids  anybody who plays anything basketball  baseball or football-related because they make all the money and the kids arenât allowed to make money.â
 Dickerson  then took  his  âthank you  master â comment a step further.
âItâs just so frustrating to see how the NCAA has exploited all of these kids. And I just feel like they are the biggest criminals in the world  and all of this starts at the top. All of this starts at the top. I gotta just say it: All these white guys sit up there making all this money off the backs of the black and white players  they do  for basically  itâs slavery. It really is slavery â said  Dickerson .

Ex Output:
Neutral


Ex Input:
What is the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Laura Moser ? Laura Moser  a candidate in a Democratic congressional primary in Texas . (Michael Stravato for The Washington Post)
The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee is taking fire from the left after months of relative peace  thanks to a document put online the night of Feb. 22 â a collection of opposition research on  Laura Moser   a progressive candidate in Texasâs competitive 7th Congressional District.
As  Moser  was attending a campaign event  the DCCC posted a short but brutal collection of hits on  Moser  that would be likely used against  her  if  she  won the Democratic nomination. The 7th District is one of 23 where Hillary Clinton outpolled Donald Trump in 2016  while voters sent a Republican congressman to Washington.
âDemocratic voters need to hear that  Laura Moser  is not going to change Washington â the committee wrote. â She  is a Washington insider  who begrudgingly moved to Houston to run for Congress.â
 Moser  responded later Thursday night  saying in a statement that the DCCCâs tactics represented âwhy people hate politicsâ and hurt the effort to take Congress back from Republicans.
âWeâre used to tough talk here in Texas  but itâs disappointing to hear it from Washington operatives â  she  said.
 Moser  did relocate to  her  native Houston last year and began running for Congress  with  her  move back home â after launching Daily Action  a campaign tool for progressives frustrated by Trump â as part of the story. The DCCC  which has seen plenty of candidates brought down by residence issues  came to view  her  as unelectable.
âVoters in Houston have organized for over a year to hold [Republican Rep. John Abney] Culberson accountable and win this Clinton district â said DCCC communications director Meredith Kelly. âUnfortunately   Laura Moserâs  outright disgust for life in Texas disqualifies  her  as a general election candidate and would rob voters of their opportunity to flip Texasâs 7th in November.â
The DCCCâs memo hit  Moser  for paying Revolution Messaging  the firm where  her  husband  Arun Chaudhary  had worked since 2012  to produce  her  TV ads. But its main attack lines were backed up by an article  Moser  wrote for Washingtonian in 2014  where  she  joked that  she âd âsooner have my teeth pulled out without anesthesiaâ than move to  her  grandparentsâ home in Paris  Tex. Paris is a small city more than 300 miles from the 7th District; the DCCC warned that voters would not process the nuance.
Both  Moser âs campaign and the DCCC saw  her  in a strong position to win one of two runoff slots in the March 6 Democratic primary. With early voting underway  and Democratic turnout in Houstonâs Harris County undergoing a historic surge  the DCCC pounced.
But the way it did so  advertising what Republicans might use to beat  Moser   sparked outrage across the left. At Daily Kos  a popular group blog that crowdfunds for Democratic candidates  a diarist wondered whether the move against  Moser  âmay have something to do with the candidate selection role the Blue Dog Coalition is playing at the DCCC.â The People for Bernie Sanders  a progressive group organized to support the Vermont senatorâs 2016 presidential campaign  called âfor the DCCC board to investigate how the decision was reached and publish the findings publicly.â There was an additional factor: Revolution Messaging had worked for Sanders  and Chaudhary had worked as the campaignâs photographer.
 Moser  is not the only progressive candidate in the district primary  and several of  her  rivals back universal Medicare  which has become a litmus test on the left. But  her  race has attracted national attention as an example of progressive candidates bristling as well-established Democratic organizations backed their rivals. On Thursday morning  the Intercept  which has been publishing articles on how the DCCC works  highlighted  Moser âs race and the involvement of Emilyâs List with party donor Lizzie Pannill Fletcher.

Ex Output:
Positive


Ex Input:
What is the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Roger Goodell ? A letter sent to all 32 NFL teams by Commissioner Roger Goodell  makes clear that the league wants to "move past" the anthem controversy. The league will propose a standardized policy on behavior during the playing of the National Anthem that will include all players and team personnel standing.
 The letter  does not mention any punishment for players who refuse to stand  which makes enforcement of the policy problematic.
 Goodell  made it clear in  the letter   obtained by ESPN's Adam Schefter  that  he  wants players to stand during the anthem.  He  did not provide specifics on how  he  intends to ensure it  but  he  wrote that it would "include such elements as an in-season platform to promote the work of our players on these core issues." The issue will be discussed  and likely acted upon  during the NFL's regularly-scheduled fall meetings on Oct. 17-18. In  the letter    Goodell  said  he  wanted to end the controversy by agreeing on a uniform approach for all teams. "Like many of our fans "  Goodell  wrote  "we believe that everyone should stand for the national anthem. It is an important moment in our game. We want to honor our flag and our country  and our fans expect that of us. "We also care deeply about our players and respect their opinions and concerns about critical social issues. The controversy over the Anthem is a barrier to having honest conversations and making real progress on the underlying issues. We need to move past this controversy  and we want to do that together with our players." The NFL's current anthem policy states that players "should" stand for the anthem  but it stops short of requiring it. The proposed new policy is the result of "many of discussions with clubs and players " Goodell added.
Local 100 of the United Labor Unions has filed a complaint charging that Jones's implicit demands of players violated the National Labor Relations Act. "[T]he employer  evidenced by repeated public statements  is attempting to threaten  coerce and intimidate all Dallas Cowboys players on the roster in order to prevent them from exercising concerted activity protected under the act by saying that he will fire any players involved in such concerted activity " the National Labor Relations Board said in its filing. Jones has not actually threatened to fire players  instead saying they "will not play " but a labor union spokesman told ESPN that is a "distinction without difference when it comes to the law." The NFL's game operations manual has said players "should" stand for the anthem   a stance NFL commissioner Roger Goodell  reaffirmed Tuesday in a memo to team owners. "Like many of our fans  we believe that everyone should stand for  the National Anthem " Goodell  wrote. But there's a gap between "should" and "must " and in trying to bridge that gap  Jones overreached  the labor union contends. The NLRB will investigate the case and will take it to trial if it determines a violation occurred and a settlement can't be reached. Meanwhile  Jones appeared to moderate his stance the tiniest bit on Tuesday  allowing for the possibility of pre-anthem protests similar to what the Cowboys did prior to their game against the Arizona Cardinals in Week 3. "If we're going to have any other recognition the place to have it is before the anthem in my view and be real clear that it's not associated with the anthem " Jones told 105.3 The Fan in Dallas. "I think it's real important for our players that they have that to reply to anybody whether they're asking them to express themselves or not that the way we do it where I work  where I earn my livelihood  is that we stand for the flag." It's impossible to overstate the distraction that Jones has created in the Cowboys' locker room  as well as others across the NFL. Players must decide whether paychecks outweigh principles  and star players must decide whether to take the heat for lesser-known teammates. This story isn't going away  and it's no longer just the players driving the narrative.

Ex Output:

Neutral