In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.
--------
Question: Comment: "Half-sweet, half-decaf vanilla bean latte with soy milk, extra hot, no foam."

I have often wanted to kick this type of person in the balls.

Answer: Sexual-explicit


Question: Comment: I agree that cars are an expensive luxury and I say that after more than 25 years of fixing them. I watched far too many people scrimping to make ends meet just so they can have a car. But, we will need that luxury until the day that public transit can get us anywhere in Toronto in under an hour. And that has to be available 24/7 because people simply don't roll over and play dead after they get home.

The argument is that the tolls will be used for transit and I am willing to say that is an outright lie. The tolls will be used for whatever idiotic project the half wits we have on City Council dream up, not for transit. Its a money grab, pure and simple.

This city allowed construction of a massive condo project down town in the rail yards area with absolutely no provision for schools, health care or transit. And people expect these idiots to do any better? Really? This is the same City who can not ever bring a project in on time or within budget. Good luck on this.

Answer: Non-sexual-explicit


Question: Comment: Theres even a plethora of primary sexual phenotypes governed by diverse genetic and endocrinological differences. All penis are GI Joe's is about as meaningful as saying all penis are 6 inches long. Let alone reducing complex behavior intimately tied to sexual orientation to karotype. It's palpably absurd reductionism.

Answer:
Sexual-explicit