We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.
--------
Question: What I don't get is why gay rights groups, neo nazis, white supremacists, pro-abortionists and war protesters all get treated with response and dignity, but groups of gun owners are treated like third class citizens.

Answer: Valid


Question: By the way, you forgot army tanks, and military jet fighters, grenade launchers, military attack helos, and land owners who keep aircraft carriers in their stock tanks, or how about people using their chimneys for missle silos.

Answer: Valid


Question: So we need to know what actions the author of the article refers to with the comment ���the weapons-brandishing displays are 'intended to intimidate or coerce a civilian population.'

Answer:
Valid