In this task, you must classify if a given review is positive/negative, indicating your answer as P or N.

[EX Q]: " idle hands " is distasteful , crass and derivative .
if an original thought found its way into this horror - comedy it would die of loneliness .
plus , you have to question the judgment and sensitivity of studio executives who would green light the release of a movie dealing with the slaughter of innocent teen - agers the week after the tragedy in littleton , colo .
the movie is insulting to horror film fans and teen - agers .
the plot , what little there is , deals with anton ( devon sawa ) , a high - school slacker who 's hand goes on a murderous rampage after becoming possessed .
along the way the hand kills anton 's parents and his two best friends .
the friends , also slackers , are so lazy that they return from the dead because the walk into the light was too far for them .
that is the level of this 's atrocity 's humor .
the movie treats death as a joke .
" idle hands " is gruesome and morbid .
the performances are stereotypical and cartoonish .
i realize this is supposed to pass for comedy , but recent events have surpassed what is on the screen .
it is not the fault of the filmmakers that real life has overtaken reel life .
and i can only presume that the writers of " idle hands , " terri hughes and ron milbauer , were trying to make some statement about today 's young people and their values in a satiric vein .
however , it 's hard to laugh at death these days , especially ones involving young people .
with the real horrors of the world put before us on television ,
a stale pastry such as " idle hands " should be held from release for a few weeks or months to give us time to catch our collective breaths .
" idle hands " is bad , no matter the circumstances in the world outside .
but the context of recent events only heightens its shortcomings .
the time is not right for this type of movie .
and as far as " idle hands " goes , the time may never be right .
this is a movie that shoud be consigned to the trash bin of cinema .
[EX A]: N

[EX Q]: according to the publicity material , with this movie the directors " hope to restore good old - fashioned bowling to its rightful place in the mainstream of american consciousness .
" hmm .
you never know , they just might be on to something .
what with the rise of geek chic , lounge music and seventies fashion , the ever - contrary kids of the nineties might just latch on to bowling as another terminally unhip bastion of tackyana to claim as their own .
but then , i doubt if kingpin will have anything to do with it .
it 's cheesy all right , but connoisseurs of bad taste will find this film exudes that bland smell of stale jokes rather than the invigorating stink of true kitsch .
that 's a shame , because , in the first ten minutes
or so the film promises to be a lot more .
woody harrelson plays the hotshot bowler on the rise , roy munson .
the movie opens in the fifties with roy 's dad dishing out the reader 's digest / gumpian wisdom in scoopfuls , shifting to the 70s for a hilarious spoof of saturday night fever .
the sardonic tone of the proceedings is much enhanced by the presence of bill murray , as the delectably slimy big ern mcracken .
it 's thanks to murray that the first quarter of kingpin seems so good
- he gives the wry , derisive edge to this otherwise rather unfocused comedy .
mccracken dupes munson into a hustling job , then abandons him to an angry mob who mangle roy 's hand .
then it 's fast forward 17 years later when munson is a fat , balding loser with a prosthetic rubber hand .
he 's hopeless until he meets ishmael ( randy quaid ) ,
an amish amateur bowler that munson takes on as protege .
so together they set out for the million dollar bowling tournament in reno , picking up pretty hustler claudia ( vanessa angel ) on the way .
with the exit of bill murray , the filmmakers seem to have only one direction to go , and that 's . . .
dumb and dumber .
yes , indeed , kingpin is brought to you by those modern proponents of laxative humour , peter and bobby farrelly , the directors of the aforementioned jim carrey vehicle .
so , prepare for much slaparound comedy with flying rubber hands , distended nipples , ridiculous hair and bull semen .
get set for stock fish - out - of - water situations when city - boy roy puts on a beard and tries to blend in with the amish community , or when suaku straitlaced ishmael takes on smoking , striptease and unchristian neighbour - socking .
now , do n't get me wrong , there 's nothing wrong with cheap humour , and i had my fair share of lavatorial laughs with woody and randy .
the trouble is that these jokes are n't bold or funny enough to drive a movie that bumbles along without much sense of direction .
it lurches from sports movie to amish - mocking to road - trip to sentimental melodrama , ( pausing for a broadside spoof of indecent proposal , and many shameless plugs for the accompanying pop soundtrack ) , never quite getting it all together .
some gags fall flat from a lack of build - up , while there are bits and pieces in the movie that simply do n't do anything .
why the long , unfunny fight in the car park ?
why two of these ?
why does that guy wear mascara , or that guy have a glass bowling ball with a rose in it ?
the film is full of these half - thought - through ideas that give the impression of any old gaffer , grip or makeup artist throwing in random stuff and saying , " would n't that be funny ? " .
well , no , actually .
the actors do n't do the movie much favours either .
woody harrelson comes off okay , plausibly acting dumb , smart , cynical or innocent when the implausible script calls for it , but randy quaid is a ceaseless ham , and vanessa angel has no talent ( like schwarzenegger , she seems more convincing playing a computer - creation than a human -- take the tv series weird science . . .
please ) .
even murray hams it up when he reappears in the movie 's climax .
all in all , a fairly useless attempt at comedy , and a certified no - hoper at kickstarting the bowling renaissance .
we 'll have to look to a reinspired john waters , or perhaps somebody from down under ( " strictly bowling " , anyone ? ) for the definitive bowling comedy .
the flying inkpot 's rating system :
* wait for the video .
*
* a little creaky , but still better than staying at home with gotcha !
*
* * pretty good , bring a friend .
*
*
* * amazing , potent stuff .
*
*
*
* * perfection . see it twice .
[EX A]: N

[EX Q]: it 's tough to really say something nice about a type of person who 's so ethnocentric that any humanity they once had is now gone , but by god , " american history x " does it , and for that , i commend it .
it not only takes balls but intelligence to make a human being out of a neo - nazi skinhead , a kind of person who dedicates their lives to hating anyone who 's not what they are , and this film wisely and miracurously pulls it off .
the subject of this film is one of them , but he is worse than one of the blind followers that make up most skinhead members since he is the leader of the pack .
he 's the one who instigates them to take a firm grip onto their rage ,
and then in another brilliant stroke , justifies it with political propoganda that makes eerie sense when he speaks .
he 's so utterly convincing as a public speaker and so firm in his convictions that it comes as a shock when he actually goes through the rehabilitation process .
his name is derek vinyard , and he 's played by edward norton with so much fire and intensity that when he speaks he 's almost as convincing and arresting a public speaker as , say , malcom
x. when we first see him , he 's clean shaven , with a jet black swastica emrboidered on his left breast , a devlish goatee , and he 's attacking the black carjackers outside of his house dressed in nothing but his white boxers and carrying a handgun in his hand that never seems to run out of bullets , at least when he does n't need them .
he so believes in his convictions that he 's willing to put his beliefs to the test , even if he knows it will mean a stop in prison , if only for a couple years .
" american history x " is about derek , how he became a neo - nazi skinhead , how he rose to power , how he was rehabilitated in prison after murdering two black men in a fit of rage that was less to do with the stealing of his car and more to do with proving himself , and how he tried to save others , namely his younger brother , from making the same mistake .
we see him at all of these stages - as a smart teenager , a vicious hate monger , a man having an epiphany , and the man who tries to correct what he 's done before - and in all of these , we get a portrait of a man from all sides .
or at least , that 's the intention .
the film 's framing device is his brother , danny ( edward furlong , perpetually looking about 13 ) , also now a skinhead , and how his principal , bob sweeney ( avery brooks , who i just found out was or is the captain on star trek 's deep space 9 ) , is trying to " correct " him .
when the film opens , danny has just written a book report on " mein kampf , " landing him in trouble with sweeney , which causes him to make him write a paper on derek 's life and how it has gotten him nowhere .
coincidentally , this day is the day derek is released from prison , and when we see him , he 's cleaned - up , not as buff , and has a full head of hair .
he 's just as intelligent , but still very rough along the edges , but he 's wisened up .
he 's no longer controlled by his anger at blacks and jews , and tries to persuade danny , who 's becoming what derek was before , to give up his lifestyle .
but danny wo n't .
he goes to a large skinhead beer bash , meets with the skinhead leader ( stacy keach ) , and then discovers that derek is as opposed to neo - nazi - dom as he was for it a couple of years ago .
the film circles around this , then spins off into non - linear flashbacks , all done in black and white .
we mostly see derek at his prime as a skinhead , living in venice beach , organizing vicious and quasi - sadistic raids on local stores that no longer hire the white , middle - class teenagers since they can easily get cheaper illegal immigrants to do the same work , and mouthing off his theories on affirmative action and how illegal immigrants and blacks have destroyed the fundamentals this country was built on .
to them , the white man is the one who has gotten the fuzzy end of the lolipop , and he not only speaks elloquently , forcefully , and intelligently , but he backs everything up with political reasons , justifying their rage at least to them .
and frighteningly enough , much of what he says sounds true .
" american history x " is a collection of really great scenes and moments , rather than a cohesive , great film that flows effortlessly from one moment to the next .
in it , there are some of the best scenes i 've seen all year .
one scene features a dinner between derek 's family , and his mother 's newest boyfriend ( played with reserve by eliott gould ) , a jewish liberal who quietly disagrees with derek 's rightist views , launching the scene into a fit of rage and anger that builds unparalled emotions in the audience ( gould 's reaction to derek 's final summation is unnerrving ) .
another scene uses humor and traditional macho sex talk to build a friendship and a nice connection between derek and a black co - worker ( guy torry ) while folding laundry in prison . and another soon - to - be - classic is actually divided in two : the murder of the two black men that winds derek in jail , which contains a final murder so nasty that it may be the most revoltingly shocking all year .
there 's much more to appreciate , like the acting , which is uniformly good ,
with stand - outs coming from avery brooks , beverly d'angelo ( as the long - suffering mother ) , and gould ( who has one horrible line , but other than that , comes off with the best performance
he 's given in what seems like a really long time ) .
norton walks off with the film , though , coming off with such intensity that he reduces anyone not doing an adequate job to rubble .
in only the fifth movie of his career , norton has invented himself as one of the most reliable and intense actors of his generation , and maybe the best .
there 's nothing like it when norton really gets rolling in this movie , spewing out lines with such authority that he commands all attention from the audience , coming off with power similar to that of a young maron brando .
that he allows the little emotions to seep through is amazing .
sadly enough , this is n't going to be the great portrait of racism that it perhaps hopes to be .
it 's too unambitious and even a little contrived to really take off as either a powerful statement or an emotional masterpiece .
the ending , especially , is pencilled in from other movies , tossed in just so the emotional keyboard can be trounced upon .
some of the skinheads are reduced to mere cliches ( kevin smith regular ethan suplee fairs rather annoyingly as the " fat skinhead , " whose lines consist without fail of expressing his desire to eat more ) , and even the dramatic arc is n't as well travelled .
furlong 's danny never seems to really be learning a lesson , since the flashbacks refuse to show his point of view , and when he decides to make a change by the end ( which was inevitable ) , it does n't seem like it has actually arrived there .
even derek 's descent into skinhead - dom does n't seem justified .
though his fireman father ( william russ , the dad from " boy meets world , " and do n't ask me how i know that ) is killed by a black junkie , and even before he spoke against affirmative action intelligently , there never seems to be any real back story why derek became so intense about his beliefs .
as such , one can see why the director , tony kaye , wanted to have his name removed . sorta .
" american history x " is a very good movie , and i was very moved by it , but it could be a lot better , and the problem seems to be that the cut as it is is not up to what he claims to be his potential .
somewhere , he claims , there lies a tony kaye cut , and that was to be the true cut until it was viewed by norton , who then ordered another cut , and that is thus .
although he aimed for the directing credit to go to " alan smithee , " the resident name for any film that is to be disowned by its director , it was n't allowed to him , under the grounds that once you disown a film , you can not badmouth it ( but really , that 's the macguffin - no one really wanted a film this good to be given the alan smithee sign of disapproval ) .
kaye 's right in that it 's not up to par , even if he 's not referring to normal par but rather his own personal par .
this will not be a " do the right thing " for the late 90s .
yet it still gets its point across intelligently , and backs it up with its story ( its message , that one can not be so enwrapped in one 's own beliefs or pain and suffering will occur , is literally said over the narration , unfortunately ) .
and even if it is n't perfect , at least when avery brooks turns to norton after he has been beaten and raped in prison , and asks him if anything he 's done has made his life any better
, it realy hits a nerve , not only in derek , but also in the audience .
[EX A]:
P