In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: insult and non-insult. Insult is any lanugage or act that is disrespectful or scornfully abusive.

Input: Consider Input: Comment: If it was against the law then why did they "let him off" with a warning about being inappropriate and not wrong ? I don't advocate taking these kinds of pictures and don't do it myself, but nobody here, including Motley Fool has made a case that the guy broke the law. And in my, psychologically damaged, mind he may have acted rudely and cruely, but did not break the law. And, again, if the woman is so bothered by people looking at or taking pictures of he bare flesh then she can cover it up. AND she didn't seem to have an issue with it until she was denied a promotion, unless I am reading the story incorrectly.

Output: Non-insult


Input: Consider Input: Comment: Liberals will be dragged through the streets unless they stop wasting our money.

Output: Non-insult


Input: Consider Input: Comment: Should the Adventist church allow women to be pastors?  If yes---they MUST be ordained, for there is no logical reason to not ordain them.  If no---then fire all of our female pastors around the world immediately, and forbid any woman in college who is currently on the "ministerial track" to continue.  Let her know, gently, that she may become a business-woman, nurse, doctor, scientist, or leader in any other profession.  In short, to allow a woman to exercise her pastoral gift yet withhold ordination from her is both cruel and unreasonable.


Output: Non-insult