In this task, you are given a passage which has a question and the context. You have to generate an answer to the question based on the information present in the context.

Example Input: Context: Intrathecal adenosine is antinociceptive under conditions of central sensitization, but not in response to acute stimuli in normals. The reasons for this selective circumstance of action remain unclear, but some evidence links adenosine's antinociceptive effects to release of norepinephrine by terminals in the spinal cord. The purpose of this study was to test whether spinal adenosine induces norepinephrine release selectively in settings of hypersensitivity.", 'Rats randomly assigned to spinal nerve ligation, sham operation, or no operation were anesthetized. A microdialysis fiber was implanted in the spinal cord dorsal horn at the L5-L6 level and perfused with artificial cerebrospinal fluid. After washout and a baseline sample period, adenosine at various concentrations was infused through the fiber for 150 min, and samples were collected every 15 min.', "In ligated, but not in sham or normal animals, adenosine perfusion increased norepinephrine in spinal cord microdialysates in a concentration-dependent manner. The effects of adenosine plateaued after 75 min and remained stable until the end of the experiment. Intravenous injection of selective adenosine A1 and A2 receptor antagonists revealed that adenosine's effect on spinal norepinephrine release was A1 receptor mediated.\Question: Does intraspinal adenosine induce spinal cord norepinephrine release in spinal nerve-ligated rats but not in normal or sham controls?
Example Output: This is the first study to provide direct evidence that adenosine is able to release norepinephrine in spinal cord dorsal horns in living animals. However, this effect was only seen in animals after spinal nerve ligation. These data are consistent with behavioral studies demonstrating that adenosine's antinociceptive effects in rats after spinal nerve ligation is totally dependent on intact spinal noradrenergic terminals and can be blocked by spinal alpha 2-adrenergic receptor antagonists.

Example Input: Context: L-Carnosine inhibits senescence of somatic cells and displays anticancer activity. Here we analyzed if L-carnosine (20 mM) retards senescence of human peritoneal mesothelial cells (HPMCs) and inhibits progression of ovarian cancer cells.', 'Experiments were performed with primary HPMCs established from patients undergoing abdominal surgery and with three ovarian cancer cell lines: A2780, OVCAR-3 and SKOV-3.', 'L-Carnosine retards senescence of HPMCs plausibly via inhibition of mitochondria-related oxidative stress. Prolonged exposure of HPMCs to L-carnosine prevented senescent HPMC-dependent exacerbation of cancer cell adhesion, migration, invasion and proliferation, which may be linked with decreased secretion of various pro-cancerogenic agents by HPMCs. Cancer cells exposed directly to L-carnosine displayed reduced viability, increased frequency of apoptosis and unaltered proliferation.\Question: Does l-Carnosine prevent the Pro-cancerogenic Activity of Senescent Peritoneal Mesothelium Towards Ovarian Cancer Cells?
Example Output: L-carnosine may be a valuable anticancer drug, especially in the context of prevention and therapy of intraperitoneal ovarian cancer metastasis.

Example Input: Context: Radiation therapy, alone or in combination with chemotherapy, is effective for patients with locally advanced and recurrent pancreatic cancer. Ionizing radiation induces cell cycle arrest and cell apoptosis through enhancement several signals such as p53, p21(Waf1/Cip1), and caspase. However, the therapeutic efficacy is attenuated by radiation-induced activation of NF-κB. Nafamostat mesilate, a synthetic serine protease inhibitor, inhibits NF-κB activation in pancreatic cancer. Therefore, we hypothesized that nafamostat mesilate inhibited radiation-induced activation of NF-κB and improves therapeutic outcome.', 'In combination group, NF-κB activation was significantly inhibited in comparison with that of radiation group. Nafamostat mesilate obviously down-regulated the expression levels of Mdm2 compared with control cells or irradiated cells. Consequently, p53 expression was stabilized inversely in correlation with Mdm2 protein expression level. The expression levels of p53, p21(Waf1/Cip1), cleaved caspase-3 and -8 were the highest in the combination group. Nafamostat mesilate enhanced ionizing radiation-induced cell apoptosis and G2/M cell cycle arrest. In combination group, cell proliferation and tumor growth were significantly slower than those in other groups.\Question: Do dual inhibition of nuclear factor kappa-B and Mdm2 enhance the antitumor effect of radiation therapy for pancreatic cancer?
Example Output:
Combination therapy of radiation with nafamostat mesilate exerts enhanced anti-tumor effect against human pancreatic cancer.