We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Ex Input:
Sent1: The fact remains that life in prison is cheaper than sentencing one to the death penalty.
 Sent2: And no one said that life in prision is "much worse" then the death penalty.

Ex Output:
Not similar


Ex Input:
Sent1: The argument for the death penalty as a deterrent has been proved wrong by the implementation of it through history.
 Sent2: If there was another factor, then there would have already been arguments against this study using other studies produced by the opponents of the death penalty to proved this theory wrong.

Ex Output:
Not similar


Ex Input:
Sent1: But the statistics don't support the idea that the death penalty is any more effective as a detterent than is a life sentence.
 Sent2: The statistics about the effectiveness of the death penalty in deterring crimes are very mixed and seem inconclusive.

Ex Output:

Similar