The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the no-need strategy, otherwise output No. no-need is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used when a participant points out that they do not need an item based on personal context such as suggesting that they have ample water to spare. no-need can directly benefit the opponent since it implies that the item is up for grabs.
--------
Question: Context: 'Well, we have extra food too. How about I take 2 water, 1 food, and give the res (1 water, 2 food, 3 firewood) to you?' 'That's super thoughtful of you. However, I really need two waters so I can provide for everyone. Once we have enough food and fire we can always go get water from the stream and boil it for the kids.' 'Of course there is no garuntee you will catch anything, if you want 2 waters I'd prefer to take all the food just in case'
Utterance: 'I would certainly give you all of the food if I could have 2 waters and 1 firewood.'

Answer: No


Question: Context: 
Utterance: 'I want to make sure I'm well prepared for camping. How would you feel if I took 2 water, 1 firewood, and 2 food?'

Answer: No


Question: Context: 'I would like to ask for 3 firewood, 1 water and 0 food. I will be in an area where no extra wood will be available and I need the wood to cook all the food that I will already have.'
Utterance: 'I understand where you're coming from but I'm afraid that is not acceptable.  My family's comfort is my top priority and I will be needing at least 2 firewoods to make sure they are kept warm.  I would also request some extra water. '

Answer:
No