The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the uv-part strategy, otherwise output No. uv-part is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to undermine the requirements of the opponent. For instance, suggesting that the opponent would not need more firewood since they already have the basic supplies or a suggestion that there might be a store near the campsite where the opponent can get the supplies instead.

[Q]: Context: 'Would you be willing to take more firewood for less food?' 'Yes I think that sounds fair.' 'So if I take 2 foods and 1 firewood, you take 1 food and 2 firewood. What would be fair for water?'
Utterance: 'What if I take two waters and you take one water then?'
[A]: No


[Q]: Context: 'Okay so would 2 firewood for you and 1 for me work, and 2 food for me and 1 for you?' 'I can definitely agree to that.  What was your second preference?  Water was my third.' 'firewood is my second preference and water is my third'
Utterance: 'Well, water doesn't benefit either of us much, so you can have two. So you will take 2 food, 1 firewood and 2 water?'
[A]: Yes


[Q]: Context: 'Yes. Can you help me to give some extra fodd?' 'I am willing to give you the good, though it would help us--we have a large group.  I really would like to take the water.  We are camping out in a primitive campsite with no running water.' 'Ya sure. '
Utterance: 'Sorry for the type--I meant 'food' not 'good'.🙂'
[A]:
No