Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.

[EX Q]: buf·foon·er·y        

bəˈfo͞onərē


noun

behavior that is ridiculous but amusing.
[EX A]: No

[EX Q]: Weird how I'm actually getting what you're saying today, Ranger!  Keyword: Today.
[EX A]: No

[EX Q]: Jan Wyland, the most tragic thing about your comment is that it's irrelevant---Far from being any kind of "outsider", Donald Trump's Emperor-Has-No-Clothes nakedness is being pushed on us like a porno film, rubbing our noses in the banality of a "candidate" with no ideas, no policies, no real platform other than other peoples' protest against a system which has made him wealthy.

Sure, he's a narcissist:  His followers have been trained that that's a good thing, especially in a consumer society; and they're all good consumers:  These are people who would rather have someone tell them what to do than take any kind of responsibility for their lives, let alone their choices:  They wouldn't even vote unless they were sure their vote meant they wouldn't have to follow through on that civic duty anymore.  

Donald Trump's fake personality speaks to their disengagement, validates their apathy in a way no one else can, and reassures them that the democracy they fear is the real enemy.
[EX A]:
Yes