Given a document, an entity and its sentiment towards the entity, verify if it is the correct sentiment towards the entity. Answer should be yes or no. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

Ex Input:
Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Kamala D. Harris is Positive . â Sen. Kamala D. Harris (D-Calif.)  on Twitter  Nov. 17
One of the most widely shared claims came from  Sen. Kamala D. Harris  who tweeted   âRetweet if you would *not* benefit from a private jet tax break â on Nov. 17  linking to a Business Insider article with the headline  âThe Republican tax bill has a provision that would end a headache for private jet owners.â  Harris âs tweet prompted nearly 69 000 retweets and more than 35 000 likes.
 Harris âs claim that the Senate bill contains a provision for a tax break on private jets comes from the Business Insider article  she  linked to in  her  tweet. The article explains how the Senate version of the GOP tax bill makes tax changes to specific industries  noting that the âthe Tax Cuts and Jobs Act would correct a long-running dispute between owners and operators of private jets and the IRS.â
 Harris  defends  her  tweet  arguing that they are simply describing the provision as it was reported in the media as a tax break. But that was not the case with the article she retweeted â which also noted that the tax provision was valued at less than $50 000 a year. Moreover  several outlets offered a detailed take on the provision  making clear it the clause aimed to settle a decades-long dispute between the IRS and private jet management companies.
Still  these tweets are not alike.  Harris  earns Three Pinocchios for referring to a âprivate jet tax breakâ and suggesting wealthy owners would gain.

Ex Output:
yes


Ex Input:
Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Trumper is Negative . Thatâs not too far of a fling  actually. One really bad move could do it  but  Trump  has insulated  himself  with people far more competent and worthy of  their  positions. To date   they âre keeping  him  from stepping over the edge.
I never thought he could do the job. Heâs made some solid moves in his first year in office  but I actually give the credit to those around him. As I said from the beginning  it was the Cabinet that would do the actual work  and much like his business dealings   Trump  would be the Ronald McDonald of politics.  He âs the face of the presidency  but the actual work is being done by somebody else.
Wolff leans to some old rumors in the book about Trumpâs campaign plans. Namely   he  never intended to be president.  He  was going to clean up by being the almost president  build up a ready-made audience  and launch a new TV network venture  TrumpTV.
Because nobody thought  he  would win  nobody prepared for the job. In fact  while  Trump  bragged openly to  his  glassy-eyed followers that  he âd finance  his  own campaign and be beholden to none (How many times did I hear a Trumper say  â He  canât be bought!â)   he  put very little of  his  own money into the campaign.  He  took donations  like every other candidate  but to this day  not a single  Trump  supporter can be convinced of that.
 He  didnât run  his  campaign like somebody that wanted to win. It was a show to  him .  He  was worthless in debates  because  he  obviously didnât understand the questions being asked of  him   but  his  base would flood online polls and declare  him  the winner  even before the debates were over (which tells me they didnât understand the questions  either  nor did they care).
 Trump  struck out at Wolff on Friday night (on Twitter  of course)  slamming  him  as a âloserâ and calling  his  book âboring and untruthful.â
Ok. Wolff  however  is thanking  Trump  for helping  him  sell books  which  in turn  is opening eyes.

Ex Output:
no


Ex Input:
Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Jimmy Kimmel is Negative . Late night host Jimmy Kimmel  found  himself  to be the punchline of a joke Tuesday after a conservative artist mocked the comedian at the location where  he  crashed  his  vehicle.
 Kimmel  was driving outside the famous Chateau Marmont Hotel when  he  made an illegal left turn  ignoring the traffic sign. The comedian crashed  his  car into a passing Audi. No one was injured in the accident.
The conservative artist decided to make  Kimmel  the butt of the joke and place a sign directly under the other apparently ignored by  Kimmel   according to The Hollywood Reporter.
Sabo told The Hollywood Reporter he targeted  Kimmel  due to comments he made on “Pod Save America.”  Kimmel  told the podcast hosts that “pretty much every late-night talk show (host) is a liberal. And that’s because it requires a measure of intelligence.”
Sabo said  Kimmel  apparently was not using his intellect during the time of the crash.
 Kimmel  has been the target of Sabo’s attacks previously. In October  the artist put pictures of  Kimmel  on bus stop benches calling the host a “cry baby” and dubbed his show “Estrogen Hour.”
 Kimmel  hit back by snapping a photo of  himself  on the bus bench with  his  middle finger up.  He  has not immediately commented on the fake traffic sign.

Ex Output:

yes