The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the no-need strategy, otherwise output No. no-need is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used when a participant points out that they do not need an item based on personal context such as suggesting that they have ample water to spare. no-need can directly benefit the opponent since it implies that the item is up for grabs.

[Q]: Context: 'Yes! Hope for lot of fun. Is there any special deal can you offer for maximum order.' 'What item are you looking for the most of?  ' 'Water and food is on high need than the firewood. Expect for the best combo for food and water.'
Utterance: 'I brought plenty of water.  I think I could give you all 3 water. Food is what I need the most of so wonder if I took 2 packages of food and left you 1?'
[A]: Yes


[Q]: Context: 'Hi - I can understand that. I have quite a few mouths to feed as well' 'hmmm, well what are you looking to get' 'Well, I think that for us staying warm is more important than having extra food. What if I took extra fire wood and you took extra food?'
Utterance: 'That could work, were not really looking to have a big fire'
[A]: Yes


[Q]: Context: 'I think we will need more extra food than that.  How about the reverse, I get 2 food and 1 water and you get 1 food and 2 water.' 'I could do that if I could then get 2 packages of wood as well because it's been bitterly cold this time of year at night in the Alleghenies.' 'That sounds fair.  So I would get 2 food, 1 water, and 1 firewood.'
Utterance: 'Yes.  That's mighty kind of you and I'm glad we both got what we needed.'
[A]:
No