The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the small-talk strategy, otherwise output No. small-talk is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used for discussing topics apart from the negotiation, in an attempt to build a rapport with the opponent. For example, discussing how the opponent is doing during the pandemic or sharing excitement for the camping trip.

[EX Q]: Context: 
Utterance: 'Good evening, how are you doing today?'
[EX A]: Yes

[EX Q]: Context: '😮Sound good enough but since you know i can not do without having anything to sustain me whenever i am thirsty then i suggest you are free to take TWO of the water and since your food has also been stolen by bears and you don't make much left, then you can have the TWO of the food items too and leave the THREE firewood for me with ONE food. How does that sound? 🙂' 'I think we are getting very close to a good deal. Would you be willing to give me ONE firewood in case the stuff I have gets wet?' 'I strongly agree and shall we call it a deal now? 🙂'
Utterance: 'Like I said, we are close but I really would feel better with just one of the firewood. I'm afraid of not being able to build a fire. If you really need the firewood, however, then I would take one additional item of EITHER the water or food instead.'
[EX A]: No

[EX Q]: Context: 'well I am sure between you and me we will find a way....' 'I really need some food, but I could also use extra firewood. It is supposed to be pretty cold at night and we would love to cook up some smores.' 'I hear you we have the same issues well you can have either 2 food or 2 firewood what would you prefer?'
Utterance: 'I would prefer 2 food. I could give you 1 food, 2 firewood and 2 water?'
[EX A]:
No