In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: insult and non-insult. Insult is any lanugage or act that is disrespectful or scornfully abusive.

Example Input: Comment: Good point, any theocratic philosophy is a threat to constitutional democracy. Canada had a  blasphemy law. 

Violent theocrats are much worse - regardless of their religion. 

I only meant to say that The Premier was probably referring to violent Muslim theocrats which is essentially what an Islamist is. But the term is too close to Islamic and ends up stereotyping the religion. 

Given that the Ottoman empire ended just 100 years ago,  the link to religious rule is more recent in Islam. About the same time the Federal Reserve was created in America and they are still fighting about that!
Example Output: Non-insult

Example Input: Comment: Here you people are, following just what the dem. leaders and the main stream press want you to focus on. Meanwhile, we are getting closer to a war with Russia, the US could easily be heading for an economic collapse, our citizens are at war with police and our citizens are at war with each other using hate and fear directed by the leaders of both parties. The dems. are doing everything they can to demonize anyone who does not support HRC, and the voters are going along with what they are expected to do. Most refuse to either admit or acknowledge they are being used, but just look at yourselves, getting all worked up over who said what, who did what, and not paying any attention to what is really happening in the world. The dems. are leading us into war people, study up on it, quit being told where to focus your attention. We need, more then ever, someone who can negotiate with the Russians and not lead us into war. That is not the war monger HRC.
Example Output: Non-insult

Example Input: Comment: Yes just a useless bunch of idiots and crybabies 😢👎!
Example Output:
Insult