The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the no-need strategy, otherwise output No. no-need is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used when a participant points out that they do not need an item based on personal context such as suggesting that they have ample water to spare. no-need can directly benefit the opponent since it implies that the item is up for grabs.
--------
Question: Context: 'yeah you are right, but water is essential for all !☹️, you must consider that too' 'I agree water is needed. I can do 2 water 2 firewood and 0 food' 'you consider me giving one of your water package and collect food package, if you are lucky you can get liquid foods too🙂'
Utterance: 'I don't like food. my stomach is always full. I only drink water since im thirsty most of the time.'

Answer: Yes


Question: Context: 'Hello.  I am very interested in the firewood and would be very willing to forfeit all the water.' 'oh really.  i am willing to make a negotiation with you on that for sure.  where are you plannign to camp?' 'I'm camping near a natural spring and will have all the water I need.  How are you planning to eat?'
Utterance: 'i have some spare cans but i am not too worried about it.  its a low prioirty for me '

Answer: Yes


Question: Context: 'Great, hey, I'll make you an offer, I'll keep 3 firewood, 3 food and...' 'Would I be able to take 2 firewood and 3 waters and then you take the res?' 'Yes'
Utterance: 'It sounds like we are going to have a really good weekend!  I'm pumped up!  We'll have enough firewood to keep warm, lots of water, and food as well!'

Answer:
No