We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Example Input: Sent1: Do you have anything to offer from King on guns, or for that matter, the 2nd.
 Sent2: You're right that gun control isn't about guns, however, but 'control' is a secondary matter, a means to an end.
Example Output: Not similar

Example Input: Sent1: The Founders had in mind guns that were much less powerful when they wrote the Second Amendment.
 Sent2: We're talking about deadly lethal weapons that are way more powerful than what the authors of the Second Amendment had in mind.
Example Output: Similar

Example Input: Sent1: IF you want them armed, why not let law abiding citizens who have passed a background check, a firearms safety check, and a marksmanship test carry their guns?
 Sent2: IF you previously had laws that made openly carrying weapons illegal, and you then pass a concealed carry law, if somebody is carrying a gun and it is not concealed, they are breaking the law.
Example Output:
Not similar