We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Q: This study has been so distorted in the media and within anti death penalty literature that it really should be mandatory teaching in journalism schools as a fact checking disaster.

A: Valid
****
Q: Should the abuser be put to death, that would be to good for him.

A: Valid
****
Q: Stanford Law Students took on their cases independently without charge and through DNA and other means proved their innocence unequivocally.

A:
Valid
****