In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence can be inferred from the statement. Incorrect choices change the meaning in important ways or have details that are not mentioned in the statement. Indicate your answer as 1,2, or 3 corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.

Ex Input:
Statement: On the first floor are the main offices of the Yokohama International Tourist Association. Choices:  1. You will not find any offices of Yokohama International Tourist Association on first floor. 2. Yokohama International Tourist Association has a regional office in Hong Kong as well. 3. Yokohama International Tourist Association has their head offices on the first floor.

Ex Output:
3


Ex Input:
Statement: Fighting down that instinct of panic which urged her to turn tail and run without further delay, Tuppence returned the lady's gaze firmly and respectfully. Choices:  1. Tuppence is unable to notice when people are looking at him. 2. Tuppence wanted to run away but instead returned the lady's gaze. 3. Tuppence is afraid of social interactions with women. 

Ex Output:
2


Ex Input:
Statement: Just as advocates of bombing use the word impunity to shift the burden of the aggression argument to their opponents, they likewise use the word credibility to shift the burden of the commitment argument. Choices:  1. Impunity is a word that's often used by bombing advocates to shift the burden of aggression. 2. Bombing advocates do this because they don't have any moral or policy justifications for their decisions. 3. Impunity isn't used by bombing advocates to shift the burden of aggression at all.

Ex Output:

1