We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

[Q]: Under English common law, the Castle Doctrine was intended to be a narrow exception to the general duty to retreat.
[A]: Invalid


[Q]: In Jan 2003 the office in charge of public saftey was caught purposely fudging the statistics.
[A]: Valid


[Q]: Interesting how some people insist that the RKBA is not limited by the militia, but here you let "arms" in the second amendment be limited according to the militia.
[A]:
Valid