In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

[Q]: Comment: My original post to which you responded, was in the context of revolution. Did you miss that?
It seems to me that you're filling in some blanks with fantasy. I have no intention of starting a civil war, a revolution, of invading anyone's home, or killing someone because his or her political points of view differ from mine. In the light of recent events, it seems that it's more likely progressives who kill their ideological adversaries.
However, should there be a civil war between progressives and conservatives, I'd be supporting the conservatives in all ways of which I'm capable. I sincerely hope it never comes to that.
To be really clear, I do consider progressivism to be a social/political cancer that if allowed to grow will eventually kill the host.
[A]: Non-sexual-explicit


[Q]: Comment: I certainly hope you run for governor, Robin. Bill Walker will be too busy building our Gasline to Nowhere to run again. I agree we should put your plan to a vote if the legislature doesn't BY THE END OF THE SESSION!  Then, it's initiative time!  Audits, audits, audits must be collected on!!!!  Deficit, my ass!  Collect what is ours and screw the CBC. Burch, Chenault, Micciche, Moriarty and their toadys and lackeys can spit into the wind.
[A]: Sexual-explicit


[Q]: Comment: The pussy hat is a vulgar symbol, so much so that the Globe wouldn't title the article with its proper name . 

I must say that I'm not surprised and muse in the death of ragging Marxist at a global level.
[A]:
Sexual-explicit