In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Input: Consider Input: Comment: The authors of the  JJ report insist that homosexuality played no role in the abuse crisis, but their own data undermine this conclusion. For example, they plainly admit that “81% of the victims [between 1950 and 2002] were male,” and that 78% were post-pubescent.

So if the abusers weren’t pedophiles, and the victims were mostly adolescent males, wouldn’t that make the victimizers homosexuals?

What else could we possibly be talking about if not homosexuality?

Why can't you answer this question?

Output: Non-obscene


Input: Consider Input: Comment: These are not the words our "globalist" PM needs to be told.  These will just fill his egotistical head with even more visions of grandeur. 

He needs to be told to stop giving away billions of  Canadian tax money in pursuit of his Nobel Peace Prize, and to start paying attention to the many real problems in Canada.

Output: Non-obscene


Input: Consider Input: Comment: "If the law[judge] supposes that," said Mr. Bumble, ... "the law[judge] is a ass—a idiot."

* In English literature ass is a donkey and should not be censored!


Output: Obscene