In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

[Q]: Comment: Yes, your analysis is crap. Your first statement is apples and oranges. The Canadian soldiers don't have to sue to get their benefits (although Harper was headed that way). You haven't read the case so you have no clue what it was actually about. Finally, the "lefties" applaud getting the damn thing over with at a lower cost. Your problem was with the 3 previous governments, this part of things was inevitable. Harper (he did love losing at the Supeme Court)would likely have been stupid enough to fight it and triple the cost.
[A]: Obscene


[Q]: Comment: Okay, so when they come for the Socialists here I'll tell them to, Fuck off
[A]: Obscene


[Q]: Comment: Yeah, I can see how the scribes and teachers of the law would've dialogued with Jesus about traipsing through the Galilean countryside with twelve women disciples gender-bendered to represent the twelve tribes of Israel.

If they complained, Jesus could've just informed them he was God and all would be well.
[A]:
Non-obscene