In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Ex Input:
Comment: icon66:  "If Trump were to turn over a new leaf--..."  if trump were to turn a  new leaf in life, without that money he's got no wife. he's got the dough to pay off all.  enough , he hopes, to prevent his fall.  is he looking at time for all his crime?  folks getting in line just to drop that dime.**
**  
 "Your faith in Trump, in the face of everything he's said and everything he's done in the past not to mention the appointments he has already made public, indicate that you, like a great many people from the older generation who voted for Trump, suffer from some sort of ailment which was why I suggested you have yourself checked."    -----well said!

Ex Output:
Non-sexual-explicit


Ex Input:
Comment: As I said, you insist rhat you should set other people's priorities. You arrogance knows no bounds.

Ex Output:
Non-sexual-explicit


Ex Input:
Comment: Both the Liberal Premier of Quebec and the health minister of Quebec are MDs, as is the federal health minister, Jane Philpott.

Other current MP's who are also MDs are Liberals Hedy Fry and Carolyn Bennet.

Previous, recent Liberal MP's who were also MDs include Bernard Patry and Keith Martin.

If Kelly Leitch smells fishy, then how to describe all those Liberal MDs who abandoned their professions for politics? Putrid? Fetid?

Ex Output:

Non-sexual-explicit