In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: threat and non-threat. Threat is a statement that someone will be hurt or harmed, especially if the person does not do something in particular.

[Q]: Comment: These punks will burn in hell...I hope
[A]: Threat


[Q]: Comment: WOW!! So boys are excused because they don't get pregnant. 

However you have defended the point, "saying girl have everything to lose." If that's the case, why aren't then taught to just say NO. That's the best unprotected intercourse method.
[A]: Non-threat


[Q]: Comment: "Low-income earners lost the most. At $1,000 a head, the dividend reduction hit hard at poor and subsistence families." That statement was documented before hand by academic studies and has proven to be true by each political act supported and defended by the economic elite of both parties and their benefactors. The suggestion that the dividend could get "too big," discourage work and encourage economic refugees to flee North is spurious, unproven  crap and Wohlforth knows it.
[A]:
Non-threat