In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: toxic and non-toxic. Toxicity is defiend as anything that is rude, disrespectful, or unreasonable that would make someone want to leave a converation.

[EX Q]: Comment: If he was a high ranking officer with HPD, would he have been placed on leave with pay? I think so.
[EX A]: Non-toxic

[EX Q]: Comment: You're a fucking piece of shit idiot HRC supporting asshat. Hillary and idiots like you elected Trump by cheating Mr Sanders out of his rightful place as the Dem candidate. Here you are now trying to run your corrupt bullshit game on him some more. Go fuck yourself. This shit is your fault and you're trying to put that on the old, smart socialist Jew. Eat shit fucktard.
[EX A]: Toxic

[EX Q]: Comment: Of course, rightist women (I am imitating your use of "leftist") wouldn't feel comfortable there even though they would still be welcomed as long as they respected the other people there. Greed, selfishness, and prejudices against people who are different have no place at the march. However, the article mentioned a young Green Party supporter getting a hostile reaction for her sign protesting the DNC. I don't approve of that. She should have been respected for her opinion.
[EX A]:
Non-toxic