TASK DEFINITION: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.
PROBLEM: Comment: The American public is sensitive to intent, and the general public's view of gossip is that gossip is a form of intentional harm.

I'm wondering how much the public is aware that the sex tapes contained a fair amount of racial slurs that lead to the WWE dropping Terry Gene Bollea's contract?

I suspect it's the loss of income more than the embarrassment of the sex that lead to the suite. Especially, as Heather Clem has said, that their sexual relationship was encouraged by her then husband, and Hulk Hogan's friend, Bubba the Love Sponge.

SOLUTION: Sexual-explicit

PROBLEM: Comment: ... Dick...

SOLUTION: Sexual-explicit

PROBLEM: Comment: That's james martin's own (now quite old) article!  He's part of the mafia/lobby.  He's not objective.

Of course it's a rational act to look at the numbers from John Jay and draw a conclusion that a male priest seeking another post-pubescent male is a "same sex" act, abuse or otherwise.

A 35 year old male seeking sex with a 17 year old male is more similar to gay sex between a 35 year old male seeking sex with an 18 year old male, than any act between an adult and a 2 year old!.  

We must return to rationality, and avoid the "advocate" thinking, such as what james martin pushes.

SOLUTION:
Sexual-explicit