In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

Example Input: Comment: The White House official position is that they're sweeping any and all allegations of sex assault under the rug and deflect to Banghazi and Hillary's e-mails. Trump's twitter posts are not to be disrespected because he is the dictator of America. They've been very clear that they are going to continue witch hunts on Hillary... Look a squirrel... God help us. We have to bend over and get screwed by this administration.
Example Output: Non-identity-attack

Example Input: Comment: Didn’t this mudshark and her nigger get killed by another nigger in a high drug area?? They were probably going to buy drugs. Oh well no big loss.
Example Output: Identity-attack

Example Input: Comment: What about the people you've banned for violating "sitewide rules" the admins have never posted?

What about the people banned for repeating the same information AmericanDerp posted in his own comments while calling it a sitewide violation?

What about AmericanDerp retroactively editing his own comments to hide the fact that he posted the same information himself after calling it a sitewide violation?

Why do your other mods try to justify AmericanDerp's "sitewide violation" because it occurred in a different sub? (Which happens to be run by some of the same mods?)

Why doesn't AmericanDerp personally respond to these allegations?

Why do the other mods allow and make excuses for such hypocrisy?
Example Output:
Non-identity-attack