We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Ex Input:
Sent1: From what I have read, there has been no conclusive evidence of an innocent person killed by the death penalty since 1900.
 Sent2: I have evidence that says that innocent people are convicted of crimes.

Ex Output:
Not similar


Ex Input:
Sent1: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time.
 Sent2: Back to reality, we convict the wrong person all the time, and we've set up a system where death penalty is actually more expensive than life in prison.

Ex Output:
Similar


Ex Input:
Sent1: We seem to have more compassion for the victims and potential victims of murderers than we do for the murderers.
 Sent2: Part of the problem we have in America is people feel sympathy for criminals, even the violent ones.

Ex Output:

Similar