instruction:
The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the no-need strategy, otherwise output No. no-need is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used when a participant points out that they do not need an item based on personal context such as suggesting that they have ample water to spare. no-need can directly benefit the opponent since it implies that the item is up for grabs.
question:
Context: 'I'm like that as well, a small appetite.' 'I need firewood the least of all though, because I have a lot of coats for warmth.' 'Are you bringing several coats while camping?'
Utterance: 'Yeah, I might even have too many.I still need water the most,so I'm thinking I should take the water and you should take the firewood.'
answer:
Yes


question:
Context: 'Hello, how are you? Looking forward to camping?' 'Oh yeah, that's for sure. What camping item do you prioritize?' 'I'm going to need some extra wood because I'm somewhat injured and can't really gather more.'
Utterance: 'Oh, I see. Well, I personally need lots of water to stay hydrated since I drank a lot already.'
answer:
No


question:
Context: 'What is it that you really need on this camping trip?' 'I really need some more food. I only have the basics, and I'm afraid it's not going to be enough. What about yourself?'
Utterance: 'I really need water because I take medication that requires drinking a lot of water. The firewood I dont need to much off and I need very little food as I am dieting. lol 🙂'
answer:

Yes