We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

[EX Q]: Turns out they're a lot more reliable than wherever the hell you're pulling your information out of.
[EX A]: Invalid

[EX Q]: It's cheap, I'd say as effective as preventing crime as the death penalty (would you want to spend the rest of your life doing labor in Alaska?
[EX A]: Valid

[EX Q]: And it seems that every time we start talking about the death penalty, that we end up talking about whether or not it deters crime.
[EX A]:
Valid