In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

Example Input: Sentence: Joan made sure to thank Susan for all the help she had given.
 Reason: The 'she' refers to susan because Susan has had a strong influence on the direction of the show, and the other two characters are all. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Example Output: Wrong

Example Input: Sentence: Steve follows Fred's example in everything. He influences him hugely.
 Reason: The 'He' refers to fred because Steve follows Fred's example, thus Steve is primary. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Example Output: Correct

Example Input: Sentence: If the con artist has succeeded in fooling Sam, he would have gotten a lot of money.
 Reason: The 'he' refers to the con artist because Con artist fools Sam, thus con artist is main subject. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Example Output:
Correct