instruction:
We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.
question:
You have conceded that a difference in neurophysiologic fitness makes sense, but we should decide on a case by case basis.
answer:
Invalid


question:
If I had my way, we'd have no death penalty except for rare cases, and have time in prison be cruel and usual with regular torture.
answer:
Valid


question:
C: The main CON argument against capital punishment is that he should have second chance.
answer:

Valid