In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

Comment: Hussein  Bagdaddy Obama  is trying to hide from us the infidels, the fact that his so called " religion of peace" is actually a religion of evil ?
Try as he might, Obama can not change the fact that the gay Orlando jihadi was a Islamist Democrat, & not a Christian NRA member.
Identity-attack

Comment: Can we assume you are wholeheartedly for lesbian relationships since "sodomy" is non-existent in their lovemaking?

Also, are you even aware many gay men are not interested in "sodomy"?

Drawing conclusions are what is or is not morally acceptable sexual behaviour based on "plumbing" materials is nuts.
Identity-attack

Comment: I was responding to your paragrahp about RATING posts, not the REPLIES to posts.

As for replies:  You stated "It's a one way street" -- no it's not.  If you feel that you have been treated uncivily in the replies you've received, they tell them what part of their post was uncivil to YOU.

As for rating:  To clarify, we have posters that are reasonably objective (like you and I), and who rate objectively even if we disagree.  Trolls however, exist on both sides, they are not objective or reasonable.  The two sides are: 'Reasonable Posters' versus 'The Troll Posters'.  I can see a scenario where mostly trolls remain.  That's what I meant by one-sided -- we, the reasonable posters, get rated out as uncivil. Unlike a reasonable poster, trolls rate you as uncivil because of your political bent.

Non-identity-attack