We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Sent1: If someone is bad enough to be considered for the death penalty then they must have had sure evidence that they are guilty if they are then they shouldn't deserve the right to live among people they could kill
 Sent2: There have been numerous people who were presumed innocent after execution because the evidence showed that they were not guilty.
Not similar

Sent1: The problem with the death penalty is eventually someone will be sentenced to death when they are in fact guilty.
 Sent2: Only if they try to murder somebody after they are in prison do they deserve the death penalty?
Not similar

Sent1: if a person kills another person it is murder, whether it is sanctioned by the state or not.
 Sent2: If a person wasn't convicted then they surely wouldn't be murdered by the state.

Not similar