In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

Example Input: Sentence: The dog chased the cat, which ran up a tree. It waited at the top.
 Reason: The 'It' refers to the cat because The primary function of a noun phrase like Bill Clinton, my two cats, the king of France, Santa ... Pronouns, then, in contrast to ordinary noun phrases, are referentially ... be 'referential anchor,' but we continue to use the 'antecedent' because it is the ... It is convenient to introduce a notation to represent coreference relations. People also ask. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Example Output: Wrong

Example Input: Sentence: I put the heavy book on the table and it broke.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the table because The butterfly wing is referred to as the pronoun here a word that can function by itself as a noun phrase and that refers either to the participants in the discourse. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Example Output: Wrong

Example Input: Sentence: We had hoped to place copies of our newsletter on all the chairs in the auditorium, but there were simply not enough of them .
 Reason: The 'them' refers to copies of the newsletter because There is not enough chairs to fill the auditorium. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Example Output:
Correct