We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

[EX Q]: Sent1: Gun free zones are areas where law-abiding citizens are forbidden to carry guns by law.
 Sent2: Criminals do not obey the laws about gun free zones.
[EX A]: Similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: This appeared to me to be an argument that self defense cannot exist if a gun is used.
 Sent2: Like I said before, claiming that semi-automatic rifles get a lower level of constitutional protection than handguns because they are less useful for self defense seems absurd from historical point of view.
[EX A]: Not similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: At the time the constitution was written, the militia, which was to be armed with privately owned weapons, was supposed to be our nations primary military force.
 Sent2: It was felt by many (not all) at the time that such weapons were not military weapons and thus did not fall under the protection of the Second Amendment or the right to bear arms in their own state constitutions.
[EX A]:
Not similar