In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

Example Input: Sentence: Adam can't leave work here until Bob arrives to replace him. If Bob had  left home for work on time, he would be gone by this time.
 Reason: The 'he' refers to adam because Adam is gone when Bob gets there, and it says that Bob is late. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Example Output: Correct

Example Input: Sentence: Fred is the only man alive who still remembers my father as an infant. When Fred first saw my father, he was twelve years old.
 Reason: The 'he' refers to fred because Fred is older than my father. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Example Output: Correct

Example Input: Sentence: The large ball crashed right through the table because it was made of steel.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the large ball because steel would smash wood. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Example Output:
Correct