In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Example Input: Comment: I am not assuming that she is lying or that she is telling the truth.  A photo shows a hand behind her it does not show it on her ass and it certainly doesn't show it on her bare ass... In fact it shows the opposite as the skirt would most definitely look different than it does if the back of it were being lifted AND he would have to be a freaking contortionist to touch a bare ass from that 'position' of his arm without lifting the skirt.  So I find Swifts claim of grabbing her 'bare ass' to be not only not credible but ludicrous.  And since 100% of the testimony wasn't that anyone else saw it but that Taylor Swift 'SAID' that it happened, well thats not enough evidence to do anything.  Now if she said that he grabbed her ass and not insisted that he grabbed her bare ass.. well then she has a more credible story at that point. IF that were the claim then I think she has at least a 50/50 chance of winning as it is she has 0.  Neither of these two deserve anything special.
Example Output: Sexual-explicit

Example Input: Comment: The entire millenial generation learned what blow jobs are thanks to Bill Clinton.
Example Output: Sexual-explicit

Example Input: Comment: Back to the name calling, and stating that Corker should step down for criticizing the president despite the fact that Corker is an elected representative, not a Trump cabinet boot licker. Those that agree with Corker don't have the courage to step up to the plate and save our country, and the world, from the prospect of nuclear war. God help us with cowards such as this in charge.
Example Output:
Non-sexual-explicit