In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Ex Input:
Comment: Douglas Saunders is right about one thing.  Blacks are better off under Obama. Where else in the world can a single Black woman have six children from six different "Baby Daddies" and collect $60,000 in cash cards and housing benefits annually, free medical care for her family, pay no taxes, doesn't even have to look for work let alone work, and when her children are in school they get two or three free meals a day, and free meals even in some states during summer vacation. And the "Baby Daddies" don't have to pay child support. Life is good in the hood.

Ex Output:
Non-sexual-explicit


Ex Input:
Comment: No, they don't. Last I saw, non-white gangs were 80% of the total US gang population.

Ex Output:
Non-sexual-explicit


Ex Input:
Comment: Agree that "young lions" is a joke.

Ok, so let's try and conjour up a more appropriate animal analogy.
I'll get the ball rolling:

"(Not so) Young dung beetles"
"Mule's vagina's" (useful to neither man nor beast).

Ex Output:

Sexual-explicit