In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

[Q]: Sentence: Sid explained his theory to Mark but he couldn't convince him.
 Reason: The 'he' refers to sid because he was the one that was able to find the dead bodies and was able to identify the bodies. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
[A]: Wrong


[Q]: Sentence: Susan knew that Ann's son had been in a car accident, because she told her about it.
 Reason: The 'she' refers to ann because of the many other details of his story that have been reported in the media. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
[A]: Wrong


[Q]: Sentence: I can't cut that tree down with that axe; it is too small.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the axe because MORE LIKELY TO REFER THAT TREE. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
[A]:
Wrong