The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.

Input: Consider Input: Context: 'Are you sure you won't get hungry? I am open to giving you the two waters, but I want to make sure its the best deal for you. I would want 2 firewoods and 2 foods in exchange.' 'brother  k ,  bro  2 water and 2 wire wood 1 firewood can you given?' 'I think that that is acceptable to me. I want to make sure we both understand: I get 1 Water, 2 Firewood, 2 Food Packages. You get 2 Waters, 1 Firewood, 1 Food Package. I will have to ration my water, but I think the extra comfort is worth it. Does this work for you? '
Utterance: 'bro its not profitable ratiobro gave 3 water 1 firewood, remaning you can take'

Output: No


Input: Consider Input: Context: 'Sure then. You can take all the food. It's not really a priority to me. ' 'Great. So if I have three food and one water, you can have three firewood and two water. Would that work for your trip?' 'That's perfect for my camping trip. '
Utterance: 'Great! Let's make a deal!'

Output: No


Input: Consider Input: Context: 'This sounds good to me, unless you would be able to part with three packages of food?' 'No, I would like to keep one for me just in case I need it. If it sounds good to you can we finalize the agreement and move on. I think we have something that helps us both.🙂' 'That works for me 🙂'
Utterance: 'Great! Thank you'


Output: No