In this task, you will be presented with a context from an academic paper and a question separated with a 
. You have to answer the question based on the context.

Example Input: The two main data sets that we will use to evaluate our architecture are the 2014 i2b2 de-identification challenge data set BIBREF2 and the nursing notes corpus BIBREF3 . 
 Question: Which two datasets is the system tested on?
Example Output: 2014 i2b2 de-identification challenge data set BIBREF2 nursing notes corpus BIBREF3

Example Input: irremediable annotation discrepancies Some shortcomings of recall come from irremediable annotation discrepancies. Largely, we are hamstrung by differences in choice of attributes to annotate. When one resource marks gender and the other marks case, we can't infer the gender of the word purely from its surface form. The resources themselves would need updating to encode the relevant morphosyntactic information. Some languages had a very low number of overlapping forms, and no tag matches or near-matches between them: Arabic, Hindi, Lithuanian, Persian, and Russian. A full list of observed, irremediable discrepancies is presented alongside the codebase. We were able to find specific instances of incorrectly applied UniMorph annotation, as well as specific instances of cross-lingual inconsistency in both resources.  
 Question: What are the main sources of recall errors in the mapping?
Example Output: irremediable annotation discrepancies differences in choice of attributes to annotate The resources themselves would need updating to encode the relevant morphosyntactic information. Some languages had a very low number of overlapping forms, and no tag matches or near-matches between them the two annotations encode distinct information incorrectly applied UniMorph annotation cross-lingual inconsistency in both resources

Example Input: We evaluate CBA, LSA, DCA, and GMMv2b using mean opinion score (MOS) naturalness judgments produced by a crowd-sourced pool of raters. Scores range from 1 to 5, with 5 representing “completely natural speech”. 
 Question: How they compare varioius mechanisms in terms of naturalness?
Example Output:
using mean opinion score (MOS) naturalness judgments produced by a crowd-sourced pool of raters