In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.
--------
Question: Comment: An old school Alaskan Democrat is somebody that votes in every election yet hasn't seen one of his or her candidates win for 2 generations. In other words, with the exception of Mark Begich in 2008 and Barack Obama in 08 & 12, no Democrat I've voted for has won a statewide or national election since the early 80s...maybe even the late 70s. 

My preferred candidates must have racked up 60 or so losses in Alaska elections since the 80s. That's why I can't stomach the Sanders dead-enders. I didn't whine, quit and throw in the towel when my candidates lost election after election after election after election. But geez, their guy loses one election and they're wearing MAGA hats. This Moberly guy's grapes are so sour he's ready to back any right-wing extremist Alaska has to offer.  

The Sanders dead enders got what they wanted...Hillary isn't president. So I don't know what they're still whining about.

Answer: Non-identity-attack


Question: Comment: In light of this slaughter by a Muslim, will gay bars be allowed to profile young male Arabs?

Answer: Identity-attack


Question: Comment: Someone got drunk and logged in as the Editorial Board again.

Like its endorsements of Gardner and Coffman, who turned out to be as moderate as Trump is credible, this is just more puff published explicitly for the benefit of partisan politics. 

Should the bill take effect, the DP board will doubtless publish an editorial discussing how disappointed it is that we all got screwed (as most will). The next day, they'll once again endorse the candidates who made it happen.

Answer:
Non-identity-attack