We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Ex Input:
Sent1: For some people death penalty is better than life in prison, who are respect their freedom and who are consider that it is better to die than someone to judge them.
 Sent2: life in jail is better than death penalty...at least they would get the chance to suffer longer...maybe that would give them a sense of what they did...or aware them of how life works.

Ex Output:
Similar


Ex Input:
Sent1: If we sentence someone to life in prison, we can always free them at a later time if they are found to be innocent.
 Sent2: As long as we sentence people to a life in prison we are also GUARANTEED to sentence an innocent person.

Ex Output:
Not similar


Ex Input:
Sent1: The abolishment of the death penalty is considered an advancement in most societies.
 Sent2: Death penalty should be abolished because i think this method is irreversible.

Ex Output:

Not similar