In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Input: Consider Input: Comment: Trudeau is so shallow and lacking in wisdom.

Output: Non-sexual-explicit


Input: Consider Input: Comment: "Arson in the second degree 
164.315 
 A person commits the crime of arson in the second degree if:

By knowingly engaging in the manufacture of methamphetamine, the person causes fire or causes an explosion that damages ...Any property of another and the damages to the property exceed $750"

I think we need to add 'hash oil manufacturing' to this Oregon statute.   Too many stoned idiots are out there playing  chemist.

Output: Non-sexual-explicit


Input: Consider Input: Comment: "Corporations"? Darn them for being so "corporationy".  The climate change lobby is an embarrassing clown show of waste and corruption - it has about as much integrity as Kathleen Wynne - meaning it's a shameless joke with an unearned entitlement complex that wastes billions with nothing to show for it.  Just look at the overflow parking of private jets where Hollywood's elite rubbed shoulders with tyrants like Mugabe to save the world over three days in Paris, but China and India don't do anything until 2030 and developed countries pay tyrants like Mugabe $100 billion in climate shame payments. Interesting how no self-respecting scientist references Al Gore's inconvenient farce or the apocalyptic hockey stick graphs anymore but he still gets a seat at the head table. Anyway, Gore has moved on after selling out to Qatari royalty, because nothing screams environmental stewardship like flying around in a private jet paid for by the energy wealth of Arab princes - ignorance is bliss.


Output: Non-sexual-explicit