In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

Q: Comment: Hmmmmm.
Let me see.  Someone to the south of us was just judged best suited for the task of the presidency solely because of his business background.
And he was celebrated during the campaign because he didn't "come across as "wishy washy."
That ain't working out too well. 
Maybe we should apply some other criteria when selecting these guys.
To quote Betrand Russell:
"The trouble with the world is that the stupid are cocksure and the intelligent are full of doubt."

A: Non-identity-attack
****
Q: Comment: All of the sarcastic remarks about radical Christian extremism are offered in an attempt to get people to think about the fallacy of attributing all violence by committed by Muslims or people loosely connect with Islam to Islamic terrorism.  Christians are responsible for the holocaust and Christians dropped the atom bomb and Christians have exploited people all over the world  using some the most brutal means to to accomplish their goals that the world has ever seen.  Here in Alaska Christians decimated Native populations thru disease and brutality and raped countless children all the while  forcing the Christian god on them.  Christians bombed the federal building in OK.  I am offering this up because if you want to make a case against Christians there is plenty of fodder.  I happen to believe it is a lot more complex than the things I have outlined above.  But never forget there is a strong case to be made against the white devils.  Think about it.

A: Identity-attack
****
Q: Comment: 'some kind of relationship?'  NO, they were, and are homosexuals, just say it.

A:
Identity-attack
****