In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

Ex Input:
Comment: All these gays have to do is make some medical complaint and say that they need to have a sex change to resolve their problem...yes, implants, hormone supply, drug maintenance for the sex change, etc., will be paid by the military.  They will even pull out all of your teeth is you have a complaint and have implants done if that makes the service person feel and perform better.

Me, too, only a tax payer and guys like our AG, senators and reps will oppose Trump no matter if it is the wrong thing to do.

Liberals will bring down the USA!

Ex Output:
Identity-attack


Ex Input:
Comment: This Hitler argument is stale...arming people with military style weapons not only supports the crazy, it reflects our inability to understand why the vast majority of police favor the reasonable regulation of firearms ownership. They would also like to see regulation ammunition that's relates to the ability to kill them regulated. None of this minimal regulation would limit your freedoms...Canada has resonance gun regulations, Australia bans a number of styles of weaponry...they they both seem okay. The difference? Fewer gun deaths, fewer crazies with arms, and a clearer commitment to community safety. It's your children, our police, the neighbor down the street that desires reasonable consideration.

Ex Output:
Non-identity-attack


Ex Input:
Comment: Orobator is yet another effeminate gay male like John Hobson. They are an absolute plague on the RCC.

Ex Output:

Identity-attack