We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

Input: Consider Input: I realize that these anti-gun rights historians need to impress upon the 2nd Amendment a militia regulating action but there is no legal evidence of the 2nd being inspected or held to inform upon any aspect of militia powers.

Output: Valid


Input: Consider Input: Can you point to the last time a private individual was successfully prosecuted either in legal or civil court for the recognized offense of having violated the constitutional rights of another private individual?

Output: Valid


Input: Consider Input: Secondly, as pointed out many times before - if you're comparing to the UK and the US, looking at violent crime rates is hardly a way to persuade anyone that the US has the right laws.


Output: Valid