TASK DEFINITION: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.
PROBLEM: Comment: Who gives a darn about the so called three founding nations. There is blatant bigotry and hypocrisy when that term "founding nations" is used as a smoke screen for racism. My family has been here for well over two hundred years. Does that give me license to discriminate against others? No!  If ratepayer’s referendums were the standard for zoning changes, NIMBYs would stop 90 of all development. In this case the referendum was invoked, because of local resistance (code word for racism) to the development. The referendum was used by weak politicians for cover.

SOLUTION: Obscene

PROBLEM: Comment: So you're saying the Chuch leaders should publicly criticize Bill Clinton, Jessie Jackson, Bill Cosby, Al Gore, Democratic supporter Harvey Weinstein, Democrat Kevin Spacey, etc. for their sexual violence?

How about Hillary the enabler?

SOLUTION: Non-obscene

PROBLEM: Comment: lol. Trump told the truth. Obama's a pussy and everyone knows it. Find your safe space liberals.

And to make Trumps point: "Chinese rudeness to Obama reflects world's lack of respect for him"

SOLUTION:
Obscene