Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.

Q: Historically, Oregon legislators and State officials have had as much interest in quality higher education as they have had in Saturn. Their interest has been in how to get degrees to as many students as possible in as short a time as possible for as little expense as possible. Their euphemism for degrading education is "removing obstacles to graduation." I wouldn't count on them for holding anyone accountable for anything but spending less.

The UO, like many universities, has to cater to a customer base that includes out of state and international students in order for it to stay in business. How far this catering goes depends on "enrollment management" needs. EM is quite a complicated part of the forecasting business for hitting targets. These customers require marketing strategies and retention efforts against competition from other U's.

Given the pressures and limits, faculty at the UO generally do a courageous and effective job of preserving educational quality.

A: No
****
Q: Kitty was a great mom, and a great gardener,  Neither are qualifications to be a leader.

A: No
****
Q: Civil Comments, one of the nice features that the Facebook commenting system had was the ability to screen out trolls that you didn't want to be bothered with, like this one-line-wonder.  It didn't eliminate their ability to comment, it just cleared the noise out of the comments that readers needed to wade through so they could focus on those comments that add real value or insight rather than comments from trolls like this one that only seek to antagonize rather then have dialogue. 

I often don't agree with commenters, but I usually appreciate their viewpoints.  But there are a few like this one who only detract from my participation in the comments. 

Please consider adding that valuable feature.  Thank you.

A:
No
****