In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.
--------
Question: Comment: One thing for sure - it's going to be extremely funny watching the BC NDP suck and blow at the same time on this one.

Answer: Sexual-explicit


Question: Comment: Being a Jerk is lauded because its a backlash against strangers deciding they get to police what others say, do, and think.  its a backlash against americanized westerners complaining about cultural appropriation when white people wear a kimono (cultural japanese aren't bothered by this) and similar behaviors.  Its a backlash against being fired and or harassed by those who are so certain they're on the right side of history if you refuse to make use of random nontraditional pronouns (outside of he/she/they and derivatives).  A backlash against people who think dragging someone through the social media wringer over a 50's pinup shirt is an appropriate response.

The professor deserves a reprimand and a healthy "what the fuck were you thinking" conversation  with their peers.  Termination isn't likely to do anything but cost money and instead of a thoughtless act, create an active antagonist to the behaviors the college hopes to instill.

Answer: Non-sexual-explicit


Question: Comment: No,  the citizen that cronfronted the suspect outside of the church was. He heard the gunfire, grabbed his rifle, confronted suspect, shot him.. dropping his AR thrn fleeing. Citizen then chased him down till he crashed.

Answer:
Non-sexual-explicit