In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

[EX Q]: Comment: A well articulated opinion. Sadly, Ms Wente grossly underestimates the power of the vast hordes of broader public sector employees and their Unions to mobilize the vote for whoever is promising the status quo for them. So long as they are kept in the lap of luxury, with all the attendant 5-star perks that others can only dream of, no party preaching fiscal restraint can ever win. Exactly what Justin did, promising to spend more.
For all of Trumps darker sides, his pro economy pro business model is slowly starting to appeal to voters of all stripes, except perhaps the extreme socialists. It would be nice of other mature economies can emulate Trumponomics minus the unpleasant elements like anti trade, anti [legal] immigrant policies.
[EX A]: Non-sexual-explicit

[EX Q]: Comment: Correct...the names on these indictments will be Obama, Hillary Clinton, Bill Clinton, Loretta Lynch, John Podesta, Robby Mook, Huma Abedin and the rest of corrupt donkeys or obstruction of justice and Hillary's home server.
[EX A]: Non-sexual-explicit

[EX Q]: Comment: These neo-Nazis are lunatic fringe, with zero cultural impact but the issue they ostensibly were protesting, removal of the General Lee statue, has generated a widespread negative reaction to the sjws who demanded it. 
A WSJ article last week revealed that while Americans are becoming more economically liberal (eg Obamacare) , they are shifting to cultural conservatism, e.g., to have an immigration policy more like Canada's etc. The reason for the shift to cultural conservatism was driven by a realization that a liberal cultural agenda was less about tolerance and more about using it as a battering ram against those disagree. For example, the legalization of gay marriage did not initially impact those who disagreed and thus no substantive reaction but that changed when the law  became a crux to close religious businesses, i.e., victims of liberal cultural values.
[EX A]:
Non-sexual-explicit