The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the no-need strategy, otherwise output No. no-need is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used when a participant points out that they do not need an item based on personal context such as suggesting that they have ample water to spare. no-need can directly benefit the opponent since it implies that the item is up for grabs.

Ex Input:
Context: 'Oh I understand that for sure. I am not used to the cold weather either which is not helping. Would you be interested in a trade for water in exchange for firewood? ' 'Well, I am worried about staying hydrated as well.' 'Do you have food? I have been trying to hunt but have not really found any animals nearby to hunt.'
Utterance: 'I do actually!  I can give you 3 foods. Would that work?'

Ex Output:
Yes


Ex Input:
Context: 'Me too! It will be great to finally get out of town for a few days. I mostly need more firewood to keep the wife nice and toasty. How about you?' 'oh it turns out I need firewood too!🙂' 'Ha what a surprise! ;-) What do you need second most?'
Utterance: 'I need food to feed all my friends that are coming up. how about you?'

Ex Output:
No


Ex Input:
Context: 'okk i will give please explain how many pack you need ' 'that's so kind of you! could I please have 3? which item do you really need, I can give you 3 of it' 'okk i want 3 pack of firewood , 1 pack of food and 1 pack of water'
Utterance: 'could i have 1 firewood, if you'd like 1 pack food?'

Ex Output:

No