In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Q: Comment: With a lot of Anchorage now stoned on pot , pills , and booze---with free unearned cash to pay for it all thanks to the PFD-----it's little wonder they think life is wonderful here. With a full PFD check Anchorage might have jumped up the charts to number one . Today's Alaskan's don't face life head on . They have to use drugs to get by.  Shame on us all for celebrating our drug culture .

A: Non-sexual-explicit
****
Q: Comment: Jill: Just another note.....the rather infamous incident you reference involved a "he said, she said" sexual assault?/consensual sex? incident involving a young lady and three (now ex-) basketball players.  We could spend hours debating the incident.  However, in all fairness, you should refer to "allegedly GANG RAPED".  I spoke out at the time, and will repeat, the Administation's actions were deplorable and violated every standard for patient/therapist confidentiality.  I very much agree that the U of O has a very self-serving "flexible" standard of privacy.  It's cost them a great deal of money in the past and will cost them a great deal more unless they develop and honor a decent standard of privacy.  regards, Gary Crum

A: Sexual-explicit
****
Q: Comment: Mr Brooks has told us that he has sexual relations only to gratify his own pleasures. Thus, he really does not give a fig about procreation. His real complaint seems to be that he finds oral or anal sex to be offensive to his own sensibilities.

A:
Sexual-explicit
****