We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

[EX Q]: Sent1: We seem to have more compassion for the victims and potential victims of murderers than we do for the murderers.
 Sent2: By not giving the death penalty to a slaughtering murderer, we are telling the world that the life of this murderer is worth more than that of his victim.
[EX A]: Not similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: That doesn't ensure that we don't end up murdering innocent people.
 Sent2: The way I see it people who murder shouldn't be sentenced to death or spend life in the jails we have here there to nice.
[EX A]: Not similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: We seem to have more compassion for the victims and potential victims of murderers than we do for the murderers.
 Sent2: If we fail to execute murderers, and doing so would in fact have deterred other murders, we have allowed the killing of a bunch of innocent victims.
[EX A]:
Not similar