In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: threat and non-threat. Threat is a statement that someone will be hurt or harmed, especially if the person does not do something in particular.

[Q]: Comment: And your lumping all the oligarchs into one heartless, unfeeling, moneygrabbing, disinterested, dispassionate, uncaring group that does no good works, employs no one, fires workers at a whim, gives nothing to charity, polluting Ebenezer Scrooge is not only misdirected, but a enormous lie.
[A]: Non-threat


[Q]: Comment: Tony - You are new to NCR or a reincarnation of a banned commentator.  Either way, it is just hubris to argue with a woman who is on the receiving end of the Church's misogyny.  Until you grow a uterus and breasts, I recommend that you listen with the ear of your heart to our sister's concerns.

You can wrap it around quote marks but when isn't misogyny "hateful"?  We aren't talking about biologically determined roles but social constructed exclusion based solely on gender.  Obviously, you know nothing about the LGBT community and your baseless claims that the T is delusional and the LGB is paraphilia is as ignorant as it is offensive.  

Are you missing the comment section of Crux?  There are many other news sites that would be more appropriate for your point-of-view.
[A]: Non-threat


[Q]: Comment: What disgraceful reporting - everyone who was in the room denied it happened. The headline should be "The Globe, the Progressives, and the Soros Gang doesn't like Trump", then we wouldn't have to read such nonsense.
[A]:
Non-threat