instruction:
The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the no-need strategy, otherwise output No. no-need is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used when a participant points out that they do not need an item based on personal context such as suggesting that they have ample water to spare. no-need can directly benefit the opponent since it implies that the item is up for grabs.
question:
Context: 'I could use 1 pack of water, food and firewood.' 'You need a pack of each?' 'Yes, at least 1 of firewood, one of water and one of food.'
Utterance: 'Okay, that would work for me. I'm sure you have good reasons.'
answer:
No


question:
Context: 'What if I take 1 more firewood, so I would have 2?' 'I mean I would gladly trade a water and firewood for one of your extra food. ' 'No, I really do need the food the most. Let's go back to your original deal? I'll take 2 foods, you get one. I'll take 1 water, 1 firewood, and you take the rest? Do I have that right?'
Utterance: 'Yup'
answer:
No


question:
Context: 'Oh cool. What supplies do you prefer to take the most of?' 'I do a lot of hiking mostly, love to take scenic photos. I usually carry food and water supplies?' 'Me too. I am not good at hunting or fishing. So I generally try to take extra food'
Utterance: 'Haha I suck at those activities as well. I don't usually don't eat a lot, so I'm happy to exchange some food supplies for water supplies. '
answer:

Yes