In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

[EX Q]: Comment: No, I'm calling YOU a liar and I made that crystal clear.
[EX A]: Non-obscene

[EX Q]: Comment: Prorogue
Harper proroguing Parliament was to stop an UNDEMOCRATIC attempt by the sore losers to form a Coalition to steal the election from the winning Conservatives
.
it was pathetic watching such "democrats" as Chretien and Ed Broadbent trotting up Parliament Hill with that intention
.
Proroguing by Harper is a tool in the Rule Book, so it is not undemocratic at all
[EX A]: Non-obscene

[EX Q]: Comment: Victimitis,
  The point is, all humans are liars, and they lie most when lying suits their interests. That's why, in all instances, regardless of gender, we must regard the claims of an individual as suspect, when those claims serve their interests and/or objectives such as custody of children etc.
[EX A]:
Non-obscene