Given a document, generate a short title of the document. The title should convey the main idea/event/topic about which the document is being written. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

Former President Bill Clinton  is reportedly facing a new round of charges of sexual assault from four women  who claim the incidents occurred after  Clinton  left the White House in 2001.
Author and journalist Ed Klein reports in the Daily Mail that attorneys have notified  Clinton  that they are preparing to file four separate lawsuits against  him . Klein says a member of  Clinton ’s legal team has confirmed the existence of the allegations to  him .
 Clinton ’s history of sexual misconduct both before and during  his  presidency returned to the spotlight in 2016 and again in 2017 during  his  wife Hillary’s failed presidential bid and more recently amid new allegations of sexual misconduct against a plethora of politicians  journalists  and Hollywood celebrities.
Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY) said last week that  Clinton  should have resigned the presidency in the wake of his affair with White House intern Monica Lewinsky. It forms part of a broader re-evaluation of  Clinton ’s conduct by Democrats and left-wing media pundits.
Klein  who has written a number of sensationalist books including All Out War: The Plot to Destroy Trump  reports that the women were employed in “low-level positions” at an organization owned by playboy billionaire Ron Burkle.  Clinton  was hired by Burkle and flew around the world on Burkle’s private jet — which Klein says was known as “Air Fuck One.”
Klein says there is no evidence that Burkle knew anything about the alleged assaults by  Clinton . He also reports that  Hillary Clinton  is “furious” with Bill for getting stuck in another scandal and offered to hire private detectives to dig up dirt on the women — but  Clinton ’s attorneys said no.
Report: Bill Clinton Facing Fresh Accusations of Sexual Assault

Gov. Bruce Rauner  doesn't plan to hold any public events Friday  a day after  he  angered conservatives by signing a controversial abortion measure into law at an unorthodox afternoon news conference.
Earlier Thursday  the U.S. Supreme Court agreed to hear a case originally brought by  Rauner  that challenges whether government employee unions should be allowed to collect fees from nonmembers.
Even though the high court hasn't ruled  getting a hearing was a victory for the governor on an initiative dating to the early weeks of his term. An energetic  Rauner  touted it at a Chamber of Commerce luncheon  saying a court win would be “transformative for the state of Illinois  transformative for America.” Such a win in a case of national interest likely would have been the big Illinois politics story of the day.
Democrats put the bill on his desk Monday  so  Rauner  had about 56 days left to act on it. Still  he made courtesy calls Thursday  including one to Chicago Cardinal Blase Cupich  and went on to sign the bill.
 Rauner 's tone at that afternoon event was more somber than his earlier victorious comments about the Supreme Court. He said he signed the abortion bill because he has has “to be consistent with my values."
* Rauner  signs controversial bill that provides for taxpayer funding of abortions.
*Cupich:  Rauner  broke  his  promise by signing abortion bill.
*U.S. Supreme Court to take up union fee case first sparked by  Rauner .
Morning Spin: How Rauner signing abortion bill drew attention away from court victory

COLO. SENATE CANDIDATE ROMANOFF BURNED BY THE TRUTH
 He told the truth.
 None of it compares with Romjue's concession to Politico that Romanoff's holier-than-thou stance on PAC money was  let's say  not as holy as you'd think.
 Romanoff's entire campaign has been based on the notion that Bennet has been corrupted by PAC money. There's the twin notion that Romanoff  though he took PAC money himself as the Colorado House speaker  has forsworn its influence and now sees a new and brighter way to conduct politics.
 Of course  the problem for Romanoff is that while the whole idea may sound good in a come-from-behind primary  it may not allow you to compete in a general election.
 And so when the news site Politico asked Romjue whether Romanoff would take money from the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee  he answered:
 Romanoff had been on a roll. Romanoff had caught Bennet in the polls. And Romanoff hit with his Bennet-is-a-looter TV ad  leaving Romanoff as the pure guy in the race.
 Romanoff's campaign had wisely avoided answering the DSCC question because there was no good answer. You can't really say no because everyone knows that eventually Romanoff would have to say yes.
 Romjue must have missed the memo. Here's how seriously Romanoff is taking this issue. He sent a letter to supporters  listing his home phone number and saying people should call him to discuss it.
 Yes. He actually includes his soon-to-be-former-home phone number -- you'd better call quickly. In case you don't call (and I'm waiting for Bennet to now tell his supporters they can drop by the house)  Romanoff says he'll take DSCC money only if PAC money is removed from his bundle. It's what the DSCC has done for Obama  who doesn't take PAC money.

COLO. SENATE CANDIDATE ROMANOFF BURNED BY THE TRUTH