TASK DEFINITION: Given a document and an entity the task is to select the author's sentiment towards the entity. Sentiments can be Positive, Neutral and Negative. Select Positive if the article expresses a positive view towards the given entity or praises its quality or skills. Select Neutral if the document expresses no clear view towards the entity or has equal amounts of positive and negative statements or expressing some fact/quote by someone else. Select Negative if the article expresses a negative view towards like harsh remarks, criticizing entities action/decision etc. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].
PROBLEM: What is the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Hillary Clinton ? -LRB- CNN -RRB- Hillary Clinton slammed what she called "endemic" sexism and misogyny in America during an interview with Fareed Zakaria , which aired Sunday . 
Clinton , who was interviewed by Zakaria on his show , "GPS ," said sexism was so inherent that she purposely had n't highlighted her career history of fighting for women 's rights when she ran for president in 2016 .

SOLUTION: Neutral

PROBLEM: What is the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Rachel Maddow ? MSNBC star Rachel Maddowâs latest anti-Trump conspiracy theory was so outlandish that even the dependably liberal HuffPost criticized it as "so flimsy that it could be debunked by a quick glance at a map."
On Thursday evening  "The Rachel Maddow Show" opened with a somber 25-minute diatribe that attempted to connect the tragic ambush attack that killed four American soldiers in Niger to the latest version of President Trumpâs proposed travel ban  which included the nation of Chad.  Maddow  essentially claimed that the inclusion of Chad  which recently pulled  its  troops out of Niger  in the revised travel ban resulted in extremist attacks such as the one that left four Americans dead.
The HuffPost  which is so anti-Trump that it refused to even cover him in the political section during the early stages of his campaign  published a story headlined  "What the hell was this  Rachel Maddow  segment?" The MSNBC host proclaimed that Chadâs pullout from Niger "had an immediate effect in emboldening ISIS attacks " but the HuffPost easily shot down her theory.
Colby College Department of Government assistant professor Laura Seay told the HuffPost that "any expert" would have said  Maddow 's conspiracy theory was "crazy" and the pullout of Chadian troops isnât necessarily related to the Trumpâs travel ban.
"Everybody that I know is appalled by this. I would like to think that  Maddow 's researchers are more responsible " Seay told the HuffPost.
"The Rachel Maddow Show" declined to comment to HuffPost but the host addressed the situation on Friday nightâs episode.
"Over the course of the day today  lots of people have been very upset with me for reporting that last night  which is fine. I didnât know you cared. But the upset over my reporting doesnât mean that anything I reported wasnât true "  Maddow  said. "Everything I reported was true."
 Maddow  continued: "Now  this doesnât mean that Chad withdrawing their troops was necessarily the cause of what happened to those U.S. troops who were ambushed. That ambush is being described by the Pentagon as a shock."
The HuffPostâs Willa Frej wrote that  Maddow  built "myths" using unrelated or unreliable information and "reduced the story so thoroughly that it lost any semblance of the larger truth."
 Maddow  has seen increased viewership as the triggered left tunes in to watch  her  condemn Trump on a nightly basis  butit seems the MSNBC host this time went too far for one of the most liberal publications in America.

SOLUTION: Negative

PROBLEM: What is the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Woodrow Wilson ? By mid-October  the situation had become so dire that  President Woodrow Wilson  called  his  Army chief of staff to the White House  suggesting that perhaps the troop ships should be halted until the flu abated.  He  was reassured by Gen. Peyton C. March that every medical precaution was being taken.
A year earlier   Wilson  had outlined in  his  famous 14-point speech a blueprint to keep the world safe from future wars.  He  called for an end to secret treaties and proposed a plan that would consider the rights of native people who lived in colonial territories  require reduction in world armaments and guarantee freedom of the seas.  He  also proposed the League of Nations  an international organization empowered to ensure “political independence and territorial integrity [of] great and small states alike.”
 Wilson  arrived in Paris for the peace talks prepared to battle with Georges Clemenceau  the 77-year-old “Tiger” of France  who wanted Germany to pay heavily for waging war.
The talks dragged on and turned so bitter that  Wilson  threatened to head home without an agreement. And then  he  came down with the flu.
“ The president  was suddenly taken violently sick with the influenza at a time when the whole of civilization seemed to be in the balance ”  his  doctor  Cary T. Grayson  wrote to a friend back home on April 14  1919. “From your side of the water you can not realize on what thin ice European civilization has been skating. . . . Some day perhaps I may be able to tell the world what a close call we had.”
Instead  Grayson told the public that  Wilson  had caught a cold.
 Wilson  would recover sufficiently to resume the talks. But  he  was an enfeebled shadow of  his  former self  quickly caving in to Clemenceau’s demands.
“It is of course impossible to say what  Wilson  would have done had  he  not become sick ” historian John M. Barry wrote in his best-selling book “The Great Influenza.” “Influenza did weaken  him  physically  and — precisely at the most critical point of the negotiations — influenza did at the least drain from  him  the stamina and the ability to concentrate. That much is certain. And it is almost certain that influenza affected  his  mind in other  deeper ways.”
Clemenceau’s greatest triumph — and  Wilson ’s greatest humiliation in  his  moment of weakness— was acquiescence to what became known as the “War Guilt Clause.” Germans viewed that clause as putting full responsibility for the war on Germany  and it demanded payment of a sum far greater than anything the country could afford.
 Wilson’s  Fourteen Points had been widely distributed in Germany  and Germans saw their abandonment as a betrayal. For 14 years  the Weimar Republic ruled Germany amid hyperinflation  political extremism and contentious relationships with the victorious Allies.

SOLUTION:
Neutral