In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: insult and non-insult. Insult is any lanugage or act that is disrespectful or scornfully abusive.

[EX Q]: Comment: “What they want is a firm treaty guaranteeing North Korea that the US will not attack them or hurt them in any way, unless they attack one of their neighbors.” President Carter said,
 “But the United States has refused to do that.”
[EX A]: Non-insult

[EX Q]: Comment: I try to stick with facts and non-euphemistic terms.  People get mad, e.g., when I use the word "sodomy," but it's an objective term which, if it has a negative connotation, it is not because of the word itself, but the images is conjures up.  Likewise, I use "same-sex attraction" because it is objective.

I'll ask again, why should someone who is attracted to people of the same sex be offended by being referred to as someone who has same-sex attraction?
[EX A]: Non-insult

[EX Q]: Comment: Lets be clear, the church is not doing this because of standing for some higher moral belief.  Churches are business that sell salvation.  Pandering to a South American immigrant legal and illegal base is key to maintaining their membership.  In general, most churches would have a declining customer base, especially in the larger cities without this added population.
[EX A]:
Non-insult