We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

Input: Consider Input: But guns aren't likely to do anything whatsoever, any more than cars are likely to drive or hammers are likely to strike.

Output: Valid


Input: Consider Input: 'The Chicago case is unlikely to have much practical impact on most gun laws regardless of how the court rules,' said Paul Helmke, president of the Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence.

Output: Valid


Input: Consider Input: 32 years of gun control in Washington DC, crime has not been reduced.


Output: Valid