We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Q: Sent1: For some people death penalty is better than life in prison, who are respect their freedom and who are consider that it is better to die than someone to judge them.
 Sent2: life in jail is better than death penalty...at least they would get the chance to suffer longer...maybe that would give them a sense of what they did...or aware them of how life works.

A: Similar
****
Q: Sent1: So should we be able to impose the sentence of life without parole, all the while understanding that we may have put an innocent man in prison for life?
 Sent2: Back to reality, we convict the wrong person all the time, and we've set up a system where death penalty is actually more expensive than life in prison.

A: Not similar
****
Q: Sent1: Did you study when these people were exonerated and in what year were they placed on the death penalty?
 Sent2: The studies are very clear that people are routinely convicted of crimes that they never committed, period.

A:
Not similar
****