Categorize the comment on the basis of severe toxicity. If the comment is severely toxic output Yes, otherwise output No.

Example Input: How on earth has a sixth-rate hack like Tyler Hurst been allowed to spew his half-assed, ad hoc bullshit on a once-respected news/lifestyle forum like WW for this long? Is he paid for this shit??
So you like smoking weed, Tyler Hurst?? GREAT! Want to defend that position with false equivalencies and paper-thin logical fallacies (cannabis is "legal" therefore it should be LEGAL!!!)? Fuck you! Like pretty much everywhere else, in Portland you can't blaze a joint in a public spaces, bars, restaurants, malls, cider houses, Forever 21, or wherever the fuck you spend your free time. Having second thoughts about LOBU 26 or whatever your shitty apartment complex is called because smoking weed violates your rental contract? Renegotiate that shit, or move somewhere else! After all, we're all free to live wherever we want, right??
Should there be a cannabis club scene in Portland? Absolutely. Focus on the defensible, dipshit, and leave this city ASAP.
Example Output: Yes

Example Input: NE Portlander wasn't talking about the obsession with "Authentic Portland" Or stupid Old vs New Portland.  But the rapidly rising obesity rates in the city.
Example Output: Yes

Example Input: Forget about what Trump says as he's offensive to most educated people. Its more important to review what Trump does. Imported labor, substandard wages and benefits for his employees. Predatory financial practices, ask yourself if this is the best plan for our country, the guy is a carnival barker and dangerously ignorant of international balance.
Example Output:
Yes