Given a document, an entity and its sentiment towards the entity, verify if it is the correct sentiment towards the entity. Answer should be yes or no. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].
--------
Question: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Kelly Gallivan is Neutral . It was October.  Kelly Gallivan   68  remembers seeing the Amazon box addressed to  her  husband sitting outside their Acton  Massachusetts  house.  She  brought it inside  opened it and unwrapped the "techy gizmo stuff."
"What did you order this for?"  she  remembers asking  her  70-year-old husband.
But  Mike Gallivan  hadn't ordered them. It was easy for the couple to forget about the puzzling package - until many others started arriving.
More than 20 boxes have been sent to the house  all addressed to  Mike Gallivan   none containing the sender's name or invoices or receipts. The gadgets have started piling in a corner of their house: Phone chargers  USB cords  an outdoor TV plastic cover  a computer vacuum cleaner  a humidifier powered by a USB  a Bluetooth speaker  tent lamps  high-intensity flashlights  a rechargeable dog collar. The most recent one came last Thursday   Kelly Gallivan  said.
"At first it was kind of weird. Then kind of funny. Then kind of creepy  " Kelly Gallivan  said. "We don't want this stuff. Some of it's trash  some it's pretty good stuff. But we just don't want this stuff and its just an uncomfortable feeling that we keep getting these things."
The Gallivans aren't sure how much longer they'll keep receiving the packages. Some items have been well-received - Mike Gallivan said he plans to use the high-intensity flashlight and a pair of Bluetooth headphones. Other gadgets  like a "little gizmo you put around your cellphone that lights up the area when you want to take your selfie " Kelly Gallivan said  will likely be donated.

Answer: yes


Question: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Lawlor is Positive . Mike Lawlor  undersecretary for Criminal Justice Policy and Planning in Connecticut   says the delay is unusual and unexplained. Last year Connecticut received about $2.6 million in JAG grants.
"Every single state gets one of these grants and this year not a single state has gotten it and we have repeatedly asked the Department of Justice what's going on "  Lawlor  said. "They consistently can't or won't answer the question so we don't know. We assume it's because they have concerns about sanctuary cities around the country."
At this point though  the DOJ hasn't just missed the disbursement date. States have not even been notified of the grant award  which usually happens around April or May  according to  Lawlor .
"There's going to be more steps that have to take place before the money's actually received  and typically it's about six months from the date of the award until the date you get the check  " Lawlor  said. "And it's important to keep in mind  this is going on in every state in the country. The reddest of red states  you know  Mississippi  Alabama  they're having the same problem."

Answer: yes


Question: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Jesus Christ is Positive . The actor who played  Jesus  in Mel Gibsonâs 2004 biblical blockbuster âThe Passion Of The Christâ is in talks to resurrect that role.
Jim Caviezel is in negotiations with Gibson to participate in an upcoming sequel to âPassionâ that will focus on the resurrection of Jesus Christ  according to The Hollywood Reporter.
Kevork Djansezian / Reuters Jim Caviezel played  Jesus  in the original 2004 "The Passion Of The Christ."
Itâs been nearly 14 years since the original âPassionâ opened in theaters. The R-rated film focused on the final hours of  Jesus â life and was filled with violent  graphic imagery of the religious figureâs torture and crucifixion.
But some Jewish and interfaith groups protested how the film portrayed Jews as being responsible for  Jesus â death. The Anti-Defamation League expressed concerns that the film could fuel anti-Semitism.

Answer:
yes