In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

[EX Q]: Comment: Oh, Gerson, you are fighting for your life as political insider.  You are nothing to Trump and would not have any ins.  You betray your party and throw in with Hillary rather than lose your insider status.  Very low Gerson, we need you out of politics and political commentary.
[EX A]: Non-sexual-explicit

[EX Q]: Comment: Here we go again.  

The problem with Milo is exactly the same as the problem with Thomas Sowell, which is likely to become the problem with Camille Paglia:  In the authoritarian world of identity politics, your politics are owned by your group identity.

Milo is Libertarian and openly homosexual (as is Camille Paglia).  His real sin is his honesty.  Make no mistake, statutory rape is rape regardless of consent by the victim, because the victim simply is not old enough to consent.  Milo had his first (homo)sexual encounter when he was 13 or 14 with a Catholic priest .  Thirteen or fourteen is too young to have sex -- homosexual or otherwise -- but they're doing it anyway.  Milo's politically unforgivable transgression was to explain that he was a willing participant and to describe the personal importance of the experience.

His account made me uncomfortable because it forced me to confront realities outside of my personal experience.  That's one of the things good journalism does,
[EX A]: Sexual-explicit

[EX Q]: Comment: Yeah, that's correct.  I misspoke (typed?).  Huge numbers of folks, including Bosnian Muslims who were murdered for hiding Jews from the Nazis and their Croat allies, were immolated in those camps--rah'matullahi alayhiim.
[EX A]:
Non-sexual-explicit