instruction:
In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.
question:
Comment: Correct  me if I am wrong, but following criticism in these comments, I no longer see the perp described as a "white man" in this story.

(However, he continues to be described as a"white man" in a related story here.)

Let me know whether I just missed the white descriptor on second reading.
answer:
Non-obscene


question:
Comment: Accuse another country of wmd's won't work. Damn social media and educated people. The bane of conservative rule
answer:
Obscene


question:
Comment: I don't believe I ever implied a defense cold single-handedly take a team all the way. If you bothered to read what I wrote you would notice that I said defensive teams who can run the ball often fare better in the playoffs (which is a fact) in response to your statement that great offenses win more super bowls (which is an incorrect opinion). If your argument were true, then Marino would be wearing rings instead of Elway. Can you send me a copy of all his SB winning performances please? Wait, they don't exist you say? lol, please stop embarrassing yourself. The titanic floats better than your arguemet.
answer:

Non-obscene