We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

[EX Q]: Again I want to reiterate that I am not in favor of an anarchist society where there is no consequences for committing crimes, my point is that society is better served by life imprisonment than the death penalty.
[EX A]: Valid

[EX Q]: But people who act in the heat of a moment, who don̢���t predetermine to take lives or do harm, they are at least excused from the death penalty for not having put rational thought into the matter.
[EX A]: Valid

[EX Q]: Before I post in full, i'd like citations to:
[EX A]:
Invalid