In this task, you are given product reviews about dvds. The goal is to classify the review as "POS" if the overall sentiment of the review is positive(the reviewer is satisfied) or as "NEG" if the overall sentiment of the review is negative(the reviewer is not satisfied).

[EX Q]: A magnificent performance of Trane's masterpiece . Branford Marsalis' new recording of Coltrane's masterpiece, A Love Supreme, is superb on many levels.  If you're a fan of Trane, and even just luke-warm on Branford, I'm confident you'll find this to be a very worthwhile purchase.       Competent but lesser musicians playing ALS would try to channel Trane and the classic quartet.  Not Branford.  He is a mature artist with a fully-realized style.  He sometimes lovingly quotes Trane, or puts his own spin on a Trane riff, but he is clearly his own man on this recording of A Love Supreme.      Jeff Tain Watts understands the essence of Elvin and Elvin's contribution to ALS.  But, like Branford, Tain is his own man here.  He's great as a sideman, and plays a great solo at the end of Resolution.      Joey Calderazzo - an outstanding pianist who has done excellent and original work with many of today's top jazz artists - falls into McCoy mode in his first solo, but then plays like himself in his second one.  Both are great solos, but I think it shows a real maturity and confidence to be yourself rather than emulate the masters when playing their great works.     The bassist, Eric Revis, is very good, but I'm partial to Robert Hurst's performance on Branford's earlier recording of ALS.       It's worth comparing that earlier performance to the new one.  Branford first recorded ALS ten years ago for a CD compilation called "Stolen Moments:  Red, Hot & Blue".  That version is much shorter - only about 25 minutes, compared to the full-length version on the new DVD/CD combo.  On the older version, Branford's quartet went into the studio, didn't rehearse much (they were all fine musicians and all knew ALS), and started the tape rolling.  It is a wonderful performance, and well-worth having in your collection.  But it sounds like they are not trying to record anything original, just to have a fun time playing Trane's music.  (Be warned, though, that most of that CD contains acid jazz & hip hop.)     In contrast, the new recording does have a bit more of Branford's personality and interpretation.  For example, the chord changes in Acknowledgement are clearly different than on Trane's original recording - not so different to be annoying or trite - but different enough to let you know that Branford has something new to say.  Plus, in the 10 years since the earlier recording, Branford has grown from a very good but young musician to a true master in his own right, and this is evident on the new recording.        The sound & picture quality are PHENOMENAL.  I have about a dozen concert DVDs covering various genres.  This is easily the best sounding & looking of them all.  My TV/DVD player is plugged into a mere bookshelf stereo (albeit a good one), and the sound was SUPERB.  Then, I took the DVD over to a friend's house who has Dolby 5.1 home theater sound, and my God, I thought I was in the club with the musicians!   The picture quality matches the sound quality.  I viewed this DVD on a high-definition wide screen TV, and it was really quite thrilling.      The DVD includes a bunch of interviews.  First is a 30-minute interview between Branford and Alice Coltrane.  She talks a lot about Trane, his music, his relentless pursuit of perfection, some reminiscing about when he wrote ALS, and she and Branford have interesting exchanges about the nature of jazz and other topics.  Then there are a bunch of shorter interviews on various aspects of ALS, including some with Michael Brecker.  I think the interviews are insightful and add value to an already great disc.      Finally, there's a brief segment called "Branford Casual" that shows Branford walking around town, working out at the gym, practicing some classical music on the soprano, rehearsing with his quartet, and misc backstage tour footage.  Neat, but not essential.     Amazingly, you get all this for the price of a CD.  And the package includes an audio CD of the concert performance as a bonus!
[EX A]: POS

[EX Q]: Confusing, too many characters, difficult to follow story line . Simply put: the movie is boring.  Clichï¿½ upon clichï¿½ is confirmed and story lines never come together. It seems as if the director was unsure whether to make a movie or a documentary. The main plot is very thin (a CIA agent is ordered to kill an oil prince, gets caught and then warns the prince (why?)) and therefore some elements were added to make the movie more interesting. So, a kid dies, which results in the "natural" response of the father: freely advising the person indirectly responsible for his son's death. The lawyer has a drunk "friend" and keeps him around, why, no one knows. Some kids become suicide terrorists and blow up a ship.    All in all, this is one of the worst movies I have seen in quite a while. I was neither entertained nor intellectually challenged. I neither laughed nor cried, I did not gain an understanding nor was I compelled to learn more or take up a cause. It meant nothing to me, which in my eyes is the worst one can say about a movie.     Save your money, save your time, choose another movie.
[EX A]: NEG

[EX Q]: Definitive portrayal of generation X (for what that's worth) . Many reviewers and critics said it best...what do you do when the "hero" of the film (Ethan Hawke) is a complete a---hole, Winona Ryder is a horrid documentarian that would give Ed Wood, Jr. a run for his money, and Stiller, who is supposed to be the bad guy, actually isn't that bad of a human being?  And Winona's friends are the smarmy, arrogant, Generation X punks who think they know everything (when the reality is (forgive the pun) they don't know jack).  Past generations would quote Tolstoy and Shakespeare, Generation X quotes TV commercials, Scooby Doo cartoons, Star Wars, and bad sitcoms.  Generation X is probably the most insincere generation ever, detaching themselves and calling themselves "ironic", when all they really do is indulge in pretentious pseudo-intellectualism.   Is this film an accurate portrayal of them?  Yes, in some ways.  Is the film worth watching?  Yeah, at least once.  Stiller gives a decent performance, it's nicely shot, and Garofalo actually almost gives her slacker character depth.  This is probably due to the fact that Garofalo actually has some substance herself, as opposed to the character she plays.  Check it out more as an artifact of its time more than a cool film.
[EX A]:
NEG