In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: threat and non-threat. Threat is a statement that someone will be hurt or harmed, especially if the person does not do something in particular.

Q: Comment: Bet the ranch that HAL, et al will devise extra fees for asinine and mediocre items like persons weighing over the "average weight"; fees for not greeting flight attendants with a smile, needing assistance with placing bags into overhead compartments, etc., etc.

A: Non-threat
****
Q: Comment: Do these people really need formal "training" to know that telling someone you thought about her in the shower is inappropriate?

How about telling them on their first day in Washington "Telling colleagues or staffers you find them physically attractive, asking them to have a sexual relationship with you, telling stories or jokes regarding sex, or sharing your fantasies about them or anyone else is stupid, unprofessional behavior and will not be tolerated, but may be recorded and shared with your spouse, constituents and the press. Looking for love here is the wrong place and you need to deal with personal issues and needs away from this institution. Treat everyone you encounter in these halls as you want your spouse, child or parent to be treated." It's not all that complicated, and it's sad anyone even needs to have this much explanation about appropriate conduct in a workplace.

A: Non-threat
****
Q: Comment: For sure there's history that he was funded to cover his ineptness.  Somewhere along the way, with enough money, he was able to brand his name because many people put more stock in the talk than the substance.  But the major difference is he can't simply fire inept elected officials who behave the same way he does but in their benefit, not his.  Donnie's on a learning curve.  LOL

A:
Non-threat
****