TASK DEFINITION: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: threat and non-threat. Threat is a statement that someone will be hurt or harmed, especially if the person does not do something in particular.
PROBLEM: Comment: Thanks for your kind words Phrogge.

Francis is an enigma to me.  He says really good things, and the way he lives is personal life is refreshing, and truly admirable. But at the same time, he seems to miss some really big things, often seeming to err on the side of clericalism. The scandal is probably as good an example of this as any.  He KNOWS that the laity wants accountability, yet, he walked away from his "tribunal" idea, and appears to have all but abandoned the Commission. Both of those were greeted with high hopes from the laity. I for one was truly saddened to read Maria's piece when she quit, and mentioned that she never even got to talk to the pope. Guess he has more important things to do...

The gap exists, but I strongly suspect that's what's giving the Spirit room to work. Something new will emerge, and I fear the bishops will be the last to see it. At our core, we still thirst for good news, for meaning, for compassion, and wisdom.  That's the hope, and the seed...

SOLUTION: Non-threat

PROBLEM: Comment: thank her for what?  trying to excuse radical islamic terrorism as just something that happens.

SOLUTION: Non-threat

PROBLEM: Comment: Very poor Cabinet choices for dealing with Trump. If he were serious about meeting the challenge, Trudeau would have promoted Garneau to Foreign Affairs and elevated Andrew Leslie into Cabinet. These are two men of substance who could talk with the Trump team. Because of his obvious bias against old, white men, Trudeau has missed the boat again.

SOLUTION:
Non-threat