We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Q: Sent1: If a criminal steals a legally purchased gun from a law abiding gun owner, we are still faced with a situation where the criminal's actions and intent are to blame, not the gun itself.
 Sent2: Before the Brady Law any criminal could walk into a gun store and easily purchase a gun.

A: Not similar
****
Q: Sent1: Now tell me, how is gun control going to stop people from making their own?
 Sent2: As I think some people who wuv their guns would just XXXX the ignorant politician away with their newly illegal gun.

A: Not similar
****
Q: Sent1: ,   and I was being kind when I say there was no change in the murder rate, The Anti-gun argument was that at least England�۪s gun control will stop mass shootings.
 Sent2: Again, I don't think anybody will argue that owning a gun prevents crime.

A:
Not similar
****