We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

[EX Q]: Sent1: For some people death penalty is better than life in prison, who are respect their freedom and who are consider that it is better to die than someone to judge them.
 Sent2: life in jail is better than death penalty...at least they would get the chance to suffer longer...maybe that would give them a sense of what they did...or aware them of how life works.
[EX A]: Similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: i think that life without opportunity of parole is the more humane and just punishment instead of the death penalty.
 Sent2: Most people who would be deterred already seem to be deterred by life without parole as a punishment.
[EX A]: Not similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: I see no point in letting someone live who does not want to live, or letting someone die who does not want to die.
 Sent2: So I think it is better to imprison those who deserve death for life, rather than even once as a people murder the wrong person.
[EX A]:
Not similar