We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

[Q]: Sent1: If someone is bad enough to be considered for the death penalty then they must have had sure evidence that they are guilty if they are then they shouldn't deserve the right to live among people they could kill
 Sent2: If a person commits murder, I don't believe they deserve to live.
[A]: Similar


[Q]: Sent1: The death penalty doesn't reverse the death of the victim.
 Sent2: What does this have to do with the death penalty?
[A]: Not similar


[Q]: Sent1: Capital punishment frees up jail cells: Considering how few people we execute and how many new people enter the prison system each year, I do not see this as being a very good argument.
 Sent2: Well lets see - we have had about 70 executions in the last few years, people held on death row.
[A]:
Not similar