In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: insult and non-insult. Insult is any lanugage or act that is disrespectful or scornfully abusive.

[Q]: Comment: Oh dear God if they did that there would be no one left to lead the Catholic Church except Joan Chittister and Elizabeth Johnson.
[A]: Non-insult


[Q]: Comment: As much as everyone here would like to believe that, his argument is there was no legal probable cause to justify the search warrant in the first place. To use an analogy, what if I were to go to the police and say, "I saw justmyview371 kill Allie, and hid her body in his spare bedroom." Would my outright lie be probable cause enough for a judge to issue a search warrant and, consequently, for the cops to force their way into your house and tear up your home?

Likewise, if the evidence against this guy was wrongfully procured, then any subsequent action resulting from that evidence would be invalid. The Protestants that founded this country built into the Constitution in order to protect our rights against actions that their former English government wrongfully used against their own people.

The prosecutors bungled this case. They should have known their video evidence was wrongfully procured (if that was indeed the case), then procured alternate evidence with which to prosecute.
[A]: Non-insult


[Q]: Comment: you know chrsty1. You must be really stupid. You begin by saying you know "for a fact the old woman could work circles around" me. Then you continue by telling me that I should NOT "regurgitate" vomit against people I have no knowledge of or about!!!! You stupid moron you wrote exactly the kind of comment you suggested that I not write. You don't know me!!! But you "know for a fact"""""yada yada yada. Moron!!!
[A]:
Insult