In this task, you're given a statement, and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence clearly disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3' corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.

Statement: For example, if the analysis indicated that the maximum feasible level for 1998 was at or closer to one of the lower prior year standards than it was to the 1997 standard, prescribing that lower standard would not necessarily be impermissible. Choices:  1. if the analysis indicated that the maximum level was lower prior to last years standards prescribing that lower standard would be impermissible. 2. The maximum level for 1998 was lower than the previous years. 3. if the analysis indicated that the maximum level was lower prior to last years standards prescribing that lower standard would not necessarily be impermissible.
1

Statement: Horseback riding runs between 1,500 3,000 esc. Choices:  1. Horseback riding can cost  as much as 2,000 esc. 2. Horseback riding costs between 1,500 and 3,000 esc. 3. Horseback riding costs absolutely nothing.
3

Statement: Of course, the overall costs of the package would go up sharply in the event of Ovitz's termination (and I wish now that I'd made a spreadsheet showing just what the deal would total if Ovitz had been fired at any time). Choices:  1. Ovitz's termination will negatively affect costs. 2. I do not have a spreadsheet, but I have put together a PowerPoint on this subject. 3. Without Ovitz the package is worth much less.

3