In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Q: Comment: The authors of the  JJ report insist that homosexuality played no role in the abuse crisis, but their own data undermine this conclusion. For example, they plainly admit that “81% of the victims [between 1950 and 2002] were male,” and that 78% were post-pubescent.

So if the abusers weren’t pedophiles, and the victims were mostly adolescent males, wouldn’t that make the victimizers homosexuals?

What else could we possibly be talking about if not homosexuality?

Why can't you answer this question?

A: Non-obscene
****
Q: Comment: Many people associated with the Clintons, supporters and workers alike, met with bizarre and tragic ends. The Clintons are simply criminals with a murderous streak in their behavior. Psychopathic for Bill. Sociopathic for Hillary.

A: Non-obscene
****
Q: Comment: Fuck That. Patch-Culture FOREVER!

A:
Obscene
****