Given a document, an entity and its sentiment towards the entity, verify if it is the correct sentiment towards the entity. Answer should be yes or no. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

[EX Q]: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Luis Rodriguez Zapatero is Negative . There was a growing feeling that "he (Zapatero) acts with improvisation and flippancy against one of the most serious economic crises of the country's history " it said.
 "If the government that Zapatero presides (over) wants to move away from the slippery slope it is on and ensure its continuity and  most importantly  drive the economic recovery and not dive into the abyss  a change is necessary " it added.
 The left-wing newspaper has in recent weeks been highly critical of Zapatero's personal leadership style and economic policies.
 El Pais was the Prime Minister's main media ally before and after he came to power in 2004.
 Earlier this month the newspaper published a huge caricature depicting Zapatero at the helm of a sinking map of Spain encircled by sharks marked unemployment and deficit.
 It also comes on the heels of the resignation this month by three former cabinet ministers in Zapatero's government from their seats in parliament in what has been seen as a sign of a growing split within the ruling party.
 El Pais accused Zapatero of increasingly adopting a "presidential" style and said change was needed "not only with respect to the political measures adopted but also in the way they are taken and executed  which has reached an unprecedented level of confusion."
[EX A]: yes

[EX Q]: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Grassley is Neutral . ACORN's tax-exempt groups and allied organizations  long a target of conservative ire  used more than half their charitable and public money in 2006 to pay other ACORN affiliates  according to an analysis by the tax staff of Sen. Charles Grassley  R-Iowa.
 On Thursday  Grassley called the transactions a "big shell game" and said ACORN donors may be surprised by how the liberal group known for helping the poor obtain housing and health care was spending their money. He urged the Internal Revenue Service to take a closer look.
 According to the Grassley report  charities "are being used to raise monies which are then funneled to other charities or to other organizations for purposes other than what the donor may have intended. ... Dollars raised for charitable (purposes) appear to be used for impermissible lobbing and political activity."
 "Senator Grassley made up his mind  and he didn't bother about the facts " Lewis said in an interview. "He's dealing with a lot of outdated information and decided to frame it with a predetermined conclusion. Yes  we had problems under Wade Rathke. ... And we have been overhauling how we do things ever since."
 Also on Thursday  Grassley requested that ACORN  which stands for the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now  be taken off a list of approved charities for federal employees to donate to in an annual giving campaign.
[EX A]: no

[EX Q]: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Amber Harding is Neutral . Amber Harding  a staff attorney at the Washington Legal Clinic for the Homeless   said  her  organization is arguing for multiple changes to the legislation  including requirements for proof of residency and the creation of a presumption  absent proof to the contrary  that anyone named as an occupant on a lease is ineligible for shelter.
 She  said both provisions would be especially burdensome for the young parents â commonly between the ages of 18 and 24 â who often seek shelter  since they may not have adequate documentation of where they live or may still be listed on leases at the homes of parents unwilling to host their families.
âThe purpose of the right to shelter is to prevent people from freezing to death â  Harding  said. With the current bill   she  added  âWe will guarantee that people will be left out on freezing nights who are D.C. residents and are eligible for shelter  just because theyâve put up these bureaucratic hurdles.â
Nadeau said the bill has evolved in a way that softens some of the original shelter eligibility rules proposed by the mayor. It now includes a provision that shelter applicants would meet the residence requirement if they are already receiving certain other D.C. government benefits for the poor   she  said. The bill has also been modified to require only one proof of residency  rather than the original two   she  said.
âWhen we say that we canât keep spending $80 000 a night . . . itâs not because we donât want to support the people in hotels â  she  said. âItâs because we want a better intervention for them. We can spend $80 000 a night in so many ways that help people more.â
[EX A]:
yes