TASK DEFINITION: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.
PROBLEM: Comment: Hogwash Gary - You cannot have your cake and eat it too. That is what I disrespect most about evolutionists, is the hypocrisy. If you are going to live by the sword, you must die by it. At least have the courage to admit and accept it. And why is sexual violence any more unacceptable that violence, the fact is you have no foundation as a Darwinist to condemn anything of this nature. If you are going to travel down this road, then you MUST defend animals we eat, and every other act of "violence" that imposes an outside will upon another being. I can discuss any topic rationally with any person, but hypocrisy is something I will not deal with.

SOLUTION: Non-sexual-explicit

PROBLEM: Comment: So rape is OK with you. Got it.

SOLUTION: Sexual-explicit

PROBLEM: Comment: yes, in a way they were fighting for their country but it was because the only reason japan invaded the Philippines because it was under American control and they feared that the us was going to use it as a staging ground to invade japan because of its relatively close proximity to japan.  if the us did not control Philippines they had no reason to invad the Philippines.  hence, they were fighting Americas war on their own land, which included many civilian casualties too.  the filipinos did not want to be under american control and got their independence after the war.  hence, my people gave their blood and lives so that your white draft dodging guys did not have to go overseas and fight.  you are the one who is ridiculous.  I attacked you because you denigrated my countrymen.  your government was using the Philippines and its people for its own benefit.

SOLUTION:
Non-sexual-explicit