In this task, you will be shown a sentence, and you should determine whether it is overruling or non-overruling. In law, an overruling sentence is a statement that nullifies a previous case decision as a precedent by a constitutionally valid statute or a decision by the same or higher ranking court which establishes a different rule on the point of law involved. Classify your answers into overruling or non-overruling
--------
Question: ""our court has repeatedly noted the doctrine of equitable tolling does not apply to section 822.3."" larimer v. state, no. 17-0276, 2018 wl 739301, at *1 n.1 (iowa ct. app. feb. 7, 2018) (application for further review seeking recognition of equitable tolling denied apr. 4, 2018).

Answer: non-overruling


Question: id.  8(f)(i); see also br. in support of ans. to pet. to open, 1/21/16, at 1-2 (unpaginated) (alleging that on december 30, 2014, chief julian tried to ""persuade and bully [mr. burrelli] into filing a 'settlement paper' in return for copies of [the department's] 'investigation'"").

Answer: non-overruling


Question: we now overrule our prior decisions in williams and nikaido, and hold that wetzel's claim was not time-barred under the applicable statute of limitations.

Answer:
overruling