In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

[EX Q]: Comment: Milo is an openly gay man purports to be a Catholic and does part of his hate routine in drag.  The Cardinal Newman Foundation should have itself in vapors if such a character comes to a Catholic university.   Milo might corrupt the students and turn them gay.
[EX A]: Identity-attack

[EX Q]: Comment: Hmmmmm.
Let me see.  Someone to the south of us was just judged best suited for the task of the presidency solely because of his business background.
And he was celebrated during the campaign because he didn't "come across as "wishy washy."
That ain't working out too well. 
Maybe we should apply some other criteria when selecting these guys.
To quote Betrand Russell:
"The trouble with the world is that the stupid are cocksure and the intelligent are full of doubt."
[EX A]: Non-identity-attack

[EX Q]: Comment: Alaska is no more or less corrupt then any other state. You can't not have a support system for your state because of corruption in government. And have you at the corruption in other states?? Have you notice the corruption in our IRS? But we still pay taxes and support our country.
[EX A]:
Non-identity-attack