We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

Example Input: My point is that many of these agencies serve important functions, and guns are
Example Output: Valid

Example Input: Given the dissenting opinions, in the future they can not reasonably argue (because their active-duty-militia-status argument failed so miserably) that there is no individual right to keep and bear arms suitable for collective defense.
Example Output: Valid

Example Input: One anti-gun Commenter asked: "Can anyone could name another mass murder that DIDN'T include guns?"
Example Output:
Valid