TASK DEFINITION: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
PROBLEM: Comment: Well, I'm also a Canadian Forces veteran and I find the apology and compensation unfortunate but necessary. I became a soldier to enforce the Constitution and defend Canada from threats, both foreign and domestic.  I was willing to die to protect our values, our way of life, and Canadian citizens.  It didn't say I was only to protect the rights of Canadians I liked or who are law abiding.  Fact is, our government violated the Constitution and international laws under the United Nations when they allowed a minor to be held in Guantanamo and stood idly by as he was tortured by a foreign government.  Far as I'm concerned, the apology and compensation have nothing to do with Khadr, and everything to do with a failure of our Government to uphold and abide by our Constitution.  Had our Government respected international law and the Constitution in the first place, we wouldn't owe Khadr a nickel.  The system failed Khadr, that's a fact.

SOLUTION: Disagree

PROBLEM: Comment: They should be tried for murder. " My friend is gone."

SOLUTION: Agree

PROBLEM: Comment: Would pediatric surgeon be considered an elite occupation?

SOLUTION:
Agree