In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.
--------
Question: Comment: It'll be interesting to see how this plays out.  In a rational world, owners/stockholders/league would have promptly and ruthlessly enforced a "no politics on the playing field" rule, left or right.  They didn't, and now they're pointedly choosing sides.  I suspect, they should've taken a hard look at an electoral map first.  They need Trump supporters, far more than Trump supporters need them.  Pro sports is business and entertainment, first and last.  First rule...don't alienate your customers.  Second rule...don't start crap, where there doesn't need to be crap.  They're failing at both rules.

Answer: Obscene


Question: Comment: Just love it when the ILLEGALS bite their handles in the ass and DEMAND more free stuff. SSDD in liberal land. Can't trot them out now for the sympathy vote now can you. It was only for a better life, right?  Didn't read the fine print in the executive order did they? Now they want every thing because California has made them the chosen few to be worshiped with free taxpayer money. Love it.... Karma is a bitch isn't it Nancy and your loser liberals.

Answer: Obscene


Question: Comment: WHAT biker thugs?  Jake brakes on log trucks are our street-noise pollution.  

Take a look at the comments here that aren't from the three of you zealots.  Those of us who live in Port Angeles know that "loud bikes" aren't a problem in PA... because we live here!

I'm very sensitive to noise, and my dogs are worse than me.  If there were biker thugs making a racket in my community, I'd be complaining about it.  But there just aren't.  Why can't you understand that?

Answer:
Non-obscene