We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Example Input: Sent1: This is just further proof that gun control does not equal crime control and there are no "reasonable" nor "responsible" gun control laws.
 Sent2: Strange isn't where the law abiding are disarmed by the gun control idea of wet dream laws yet there are still firearms floating about the criminal classes.
Example Output: Not similar

Example Input: Sent1: How can a people defend themselves from the government, unless they are able to maintain the same weapons as the government has?
 Sent2: Making guns illegal wouldn't solve anything except to take them away from people that want to defend themselves.
Example Output: Not similar

Example Input: Sent1: If you believe what you say in:as it is presently, gun crimes still occur, people have their rights to own guns revoked on a case by case basis, and dying of gun shots is actually very rare.
 Sent2: Sure you say guns don't kill people but people kill people, but the gun is only a tool or a means to that end.
Example Output:
Not similar