In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Q: Comment: Taking Billions of Dollars out of the CBR to keep the lights on we lose $166,000,000 in future investment income. Because the GOP super majority cannot, will not for re-election purposes, come up with a plan to fix the fiscal mess the state goes further and further into deficit spending mode. Contrary to what Mr. Herz says in his otherwise stellar reporting  on Juneau it is the subsidies of $600,000,000 to the oil industry that effects the states budget as much as a restructuring of the PFD would do. I'm  in favor of seeing the PFD restructured but not until SB21 is revised, the "new oil" clause is struck and the subsidies  permanently repealed. The Governor presented a balanced plan of revenue increases and substantial spending cuts that were ignored by the legislature. As for Chenault and Meyer saying the lege is at an impasse therefore nothing can be done until the next regular session I call BS. What will be different in Jan. versus now? Just do the damn job you were elected to do.

A: Obscene
****
Q: Comment: Those damned toddlers should read the labels before they swallow the magnets!

A: Obscene
****
Q: Comment: The Proud Boys have been tried and convicted in the court of mass media, and in the court of the federal administrative complex of two egregious offences:

1. Publicly disagreeing on policy issues with an Aboriginal group.

2. Being white males. 

Everybody knows, you can do one or the other but it is an unforgivable offence to do both.

A:
Non-obscene
****