instruction:
In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.
question:
Comment: >>white supremacists fill comment forums with your waste products? Not sure Civil Comments is working out the way the G&M intended...
.
Victimhood and labels - that's how the left deals with opposing opinions.
answer:
Non-sexual-explicit


question:
Comment: Sounds like you like your pussy grabbed huh moron?
answer:
Sexual-explicit


question:
Comment: It wasn't Comey's decision to prosecute or not prosecute.  Do you agree that Dems want the investigation to continue through the next election? Do you not have confidence in the FBI and Senate investigations (bi partisan, by the way)? The way the MSM and dem pundits every day are comparing Trump to Nixon, on and on, is laughable at this point. I also believe any amount of collusion (that you've described), is minor compared to the months of negative MSM and mainstream Republican politicians press against Trump who won despite all odds against him winning, right up until election night. I believe he won because Hillary was a corrupt candidate, who cheated to win the nomination and was hardly able to campaign. To point the finger at Russian collusion with Trump is a real stretch for the reason Hillary lost. I'm for any investigation that has a time limit on it, say 7-8 months. Right now Schumer looks really bad the way he's handling this matter.
answer:

Non-sexual-explicit