We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

[Q]: Sent1: My argument makes it clear that innocent people need not be sentenced to death in order for the death penalty to be unjust.
 Sent2: while it is a fact that innocent people have been placed and convicted to death row condemned to die, there are however people who are guilty and should die.
[A]: Not similar


[Q]: Sent1: The death penalty has never been shown to be a deterent to murder.
 Sent2: There is absolutely ZERO evidence that the death penalty deters crime.
[A]: Similar


[Q]: Sent1: They support it because killing murderers is the right thing to do.
 Sent2: My point was that there are ways of dealing with violent criminals, murderers even, without executing them.
[A]:
Similar