Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.

[Q]: I feel like no one is talking about the real story here: Wesley Crusher and the Travler went through Time and Space for a while. Who is to say Wesley didn't populate the Humans in the Star Wars galaxy. I mean, you’re far from home and lonely and you want to get your freak on. Who could blame him. Wesley Crusher, the cause of all ills across multiple galaxies.
[A]: Yes


[Q]: <- slowly shakes head. We have Saudi Arabia and Iran funding Islamic terrorism, and yet this author claims there is no correlation between Islam as a religion and terrorism that is conducted by "a tiny faction." The facts are clear, it is the major players governing these 2 counties who are waging a religious war through terrorism. Defeat ISIS today, and come tomorrow they will be replaced with another. the solution is simple; arm both of these countries to the hilt and let them genocide each other, and when they stand before their god their god will sort this out for them. But then Europe and America have an oil problem, and then they have commerce problem, and rather than deal with that once, for all, it's easier to sacrifice a few hundred thousand souls each year as the herd  needs thinned anyway.
[A]: No


[Q]: Yeah, they had nothing to do with this other than supporting and perpetuating gun culture, participating in ridiculous things like the ban on gun violence research, and failing yet again to use their precious guns to stop a mass shooting.
[A]:
Yes