In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

Example Input: Sentence: Sid explained his theory to Mark but he couldn't understand him.
 Reason: The 'he' refers to mark because Sid was able to communicate with him. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Example Output: Wrong

Example Input: Sentence: The fish ate the worm. It was hungry.
 Reason: The 'It' refers to the fish because The pronoun probably refers to the worm because it was eaten and was tasty. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Example Output: Wrong

Example Input: Sentence: Joe's uncle can still beat him at tennis, even though he is 30 years younger.
 Reason: The 'he' refers to joe because his uncle, Joe, Jr., is a well-known New York City sports figure. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Example Output:
Wrong