Categorize the comment on the basis of severe toxicity. If the comment is severely toxic output Yes, otherwise output No.

Example Input: bycatch: if people think Alaskans dont pay tax to live here by paying one of the highest property taxes rates, paying local sales taxes, looseing PFD income to severence taxes. That adding an income tax is an absolute necessity to be "fair and not have a free ride"  go ahead and tax the heck out of our incomes. But then I'll have to say reduce my property tax burden. Quit taxes that affect the PFD base fund income. There the math is equaled out for ya. I can reference tax data to:   http://www.keypolicydata.com/blog-archives/2015/01/severance-taxes-fuel-alaskas-highest-nation-tax-burden-2013/ 
Again I say tax is tax no matter how its removed from someones income it is still tax.
Example Output: No

Example Input: The Corporate model has devolved into one that is totally controlled by sociopathic horders.
Example Output: Yes

Example Input: Think of this situation: who bears responsibility for Lavoy Finecum being shot?  I am saying both the officers who shot him and LaVoy.   The officers for deciding to shoot and LaVoy for reaching for his pocket.   Here is another situation, you go to a biker bar and insult the meanest biker in the joint, do you bear responsibility for getting assaulted or worse? 
As far as the protestor is concerned, he chose to put himself in your "boxing ring", by creating a disturbance.  Now, should he have been attacked, no.  Again, I say he should not have been attacked.  However, if you are at a firing range and you step in front of a target, do not be surprised if you get shot.
Example Output:
No