Given a document and an entity the task is to select the author's sentiment towards the entity. Sentiments can be Positive, Neutral and Negative. Select Positive if the article expresses a positive view towards the given entity or praises its quality or skills. Select Neutral if the document expresses no clear view towards the entity or has equal amounts of positive and negative statements or expressing some fact/quote by someone else. Select Negative if the article expresses a negative view towards like harsh remarks, criticizing entities action/decision etc. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

Ex Input:
What is the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Arielle O'Shea ? "Millennials are making really good decisions whenever they have an opportunity to save more  " Arielle O'Shea   retirement and investing specialist at NerdWallet  told Business Insider.
"Millennials are doing themselves a big service here by saving so early and taking advantage of compound interest  " O'Shea  said.
 It 's possible older Americans aren't saving as much because the cost of raising kids increases the older they get   O'Shea  said  especially when parents "start feeling the crunch of college."
"Everyone can use strategies millennial parents are using  " O'Shea  said. "Save more when you get a raise  when you pay off debt  or cut back on dining."
That's great for some people   O'Shea  said  but "knowing how much you need to be saving is huge  and working toward a goal makes all the difference."

Ex Output:
Positive


Ex Input:
What is the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Roger Goodell ? An anonymous Twitter account that routinely criticized media coverage of NFL commissioner Roger Goodell  was being run by  Goodell's wife   according to Andrew Beaton of the Wall Street Journal.
 The @forargument account  which was deleted after the Wall Street Journal began investigating  published under the name "Jones smith ."
According to Beaton   the account  had no followers and no profile picture. However  after the Wall Street Journal asked Jane Skinner Goodell  the commissioner's wife  about the account  she admitted to being the owner in a written statement.
 The account  was said to have specifically targeted media members who were critical of the commissioner.
In one example provided by the Wall Street Journal   the account  replied to a tweet from Pro Football Talk saying the commissioner needs to solve the national anthem issue in the NFL.
In another example  Jason Gay of the Wall Street Journal made a joke about a photo that showed Roger Goodell posing with New England Patriots fans.
"Why is everyone so immature? (including you?) "  the account  wrote. "Let's celebrate the new season."
You can see more examples of tweets from  the account  at the Wall Street Journal.

Ex Output:
Positive


Ex Input:
What is the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Bill Clinton ? It is fascinating and welcome to see liberals discovering their consciences on  Bill Clintonâs  alleged rapist tendencies. True  this moral revelation comes about two decades later than it should have  and at precisely the moment the Left can no longer reasonably ignore it and not a moment sooner.
Just the same  it is nice to finally see some honesty on this issue. It is nice to see liberals  having no more use for the Clintons  finally undertaking what MSNBC host Chris Hayes calls âa real reckoningâ with the very real possibility that  Bill Clinton  raped Juanita Broaddrick nearly 40 years ago.
And yet. One is tempted to believe weâre witnessing not a âreckoningâ but a quick and guilty kind of moral shrug  a sort of Kansas City shuffle meant to absolve a bunch of deeply culpable people of their own deep and stinking culpability. For a real âreckoningâ of American liberalismâs wink-nod approach to  Bill Clintonâs  alleged sex crimes would implicate American liberalism itself  or at least the last few decades of it. That is understandably not something many liberals are willing to do.
A great example of this evasive genre can be found at The Atlantic  where Caitlin Flanagan has written an article titled  simply  â Bill Clinton : A Reckoning.â The article itself is actually not a reckoning of  Bill Clinton  or even an overture toward a reckoning.
Indeed  Flanagan only comes to the sexual assault allegations leveled at  Clinton  only about two-thirds of the way through  after bringing up Clarence Thomasâs alleged sexual harassment of Anita Hill. She places most of the blame for  Clinton  on âmachine feminismâ rather than Democratic opportunism  then lamely asserts Democrats need to âcome to termsâ with how they âabandoned some of [their] central principlesâ in their unthinking defense of  Clinton .
Almost as an afterthought  Goldberg writes: âItâs fair to conclude  that because of Broaddrickâs allegations   Bill Clinton  no longer has a place in decent society.â Goodness  after two decades this is the best we can manage?
Even Hayesâs own viral tweet is couched in a tired and evasive formula. âAs gross and cynical and hypocrtical [sic] as the rightâs âwhat about  Bill Clinton â stuff is â  he  wrote  âitâs also true that Democrats and the center left are overdue for a real reckoning with the allegations against  him .â Got it: so the Right is âgross and cynical and hypocriticalâ regarding the Leftâs steadfast avoidance of  Bill Clintonâs  alleged sex crimes  but weâre also correct? Are liberals capable of discussing  Clinton âs sordid history without having to obsessively refer back to conservatives?
They Let  Bill Clinton  Keep Legitimacy for 18 More Years
There is a deeper and more cynical politics at work here. âReckoningâ with  Bill Clintonâs  alleged crimes is not just a matter of the Democratic Party saying sorry for not believing Broaddrick in 1999.  Bill Clinton  has remained a prominent fixture of the party in the intervening 18 years  including as a major fundraiser during  his  wifeâs two failed campaigns for president and as a stump for other Democrats  including President Obama.
Progressives  meanwhile  adore  him . â Bill Clinton  couldnât keep it in  his  pants  but  he  was a great president!â one very liberal woman told me years ago. Broaddrick would surely agree with the first part. Summing up the feelings of millions of progressive millennials  comedian John Mulaney described  Clinton  as a âsmooth and fantastic hillbilly who should be declared emperor of the United State of America.â This kind of hero-worship is only possible if one disbelieves Broaddrickâs testimony entirelyâtestimony that  20 years on  remains very credible.
A âreckoningâ of the accusations against  Bill Clinton  must thus also function as a reckoning of the last couple of decades of Democratic politics  a politics that has featured  Bill Clinton  as an ancillary yet still near-permanent fixture. Every Democrat has known of Broaddrickâs accusations for years. Yet  Bill Clinton  was still eagerly accepted within âdecent society â and  his  wifeâwho is quite reasonably seen as both an apologist for her husbandâs perverted behavior and possibly a criminal conspirator regarding his crimesâbecame the standard-bearer of the Democratic Party itself in the last election.
To reckon with all of this means to reckon with the Democratic party in totoâits political instincts  its morals  and its public credibility and future viability.The Left predictably isnât very keen to do that. So we get what weâve witnessed in the past week: liberals feigning a kind of come-to-Jesus public confessional over  Bill Clinton  while ultimately just complaining about conservatives.
It is true that  in the end  we do not know if  Bill Clinton  raped Broaddrick. It is virtually impossible to prove  it  one way or the other  as  it  generally is with these types of claims. It would not be wholly unreasonable for someone to doubt Broaddrick after a careful review of the evidence. Then again  her claim  and the evidence surrounding it  is compelling enough to be believable  more so than many.
So what does it say about the Democratic Party that it has nevertheless allowed  Bill Clinton  a revered and permanent spot in its ranks? And what does it say about liberals that  even now  after all of this time  they cannot truly come to grips with it?

Ex Output:

Neutral