We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

[Q]: If you thought sharks with lasers was bad XXX, wait until you see bees with lasers and poisonous metal stingers and little speakers that can play the Flight of the Bumble Bee as performed by Black Sabbath.
[A]: Invalid


[Q]: Secondly, as pointed out many times before - if you're comparing to the UK and the US, looking at violent crime rates is hardly a way to persuade anyone that the US has the right laws.
[A]: Valid


[Q]: Somebody even made the argument that the definition of arms in the Second Amendment was limited to 18th century flintlocks only, so no modern guns were protected, and the court rejected this argument as well.
[A]:
Valid