In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

Example Input: Sentence: The dog chased the cat, which ran up a tree. It waited at the top.
 Reason: The 'It' refers to the cat because the cat is on the tree, and it is not at the bottom. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Example Output: Correct

Example Input: Sentence: The large ball crashed right through the table because it was made of styrofoam.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the table because A ball isn't going to crash through a table if it was the one made out of Styrofoam as oppose to the ball being the one. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Example Output: Correct

Example Input: Sentence: Dan had to stop Bill from toying with the injured bird. He is very compassionate.
 Reason: The 'He' refers to dan because a compassionate guy stops others from toying things. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Example Output:
Correct