We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

[EX Q]: I believe that people who have killed, raped, tortured, or have done any other extreme act of violence should get the death penalty.
[EX A]: Valid

[EX Q]: The death penalty executes felons found guilty of especially heinous crimes.
[EX A]: Valid

[EX Q]: There is a higher quality of prosecution and defense in these cases and new death penalty law, which began after Furman v Georgia (1972), is more settled than it had been from 1973-1987.
[EX A]:
Valid