In this task, you must classify if a given review is positive/negative, indicating your answer as P or N.

Ex Input:
plot :
jet li is a chinese cop asked to help some french policemen nab a bad guy .
but one thing leads to another , and the next thing you know
, li 's being chased by the same french cops with whom he was supposed to be working .
a lot of ass - kicking , face - whippings , gun fights
and . . . okay , a little more ass - kicking ensues .
critique : very cool !
now here 's a movie that gives you exactly what you 're looking for
, if what you 're looking for is kickass action , a palpable good cop / bad cop story line , some hardcore stunts and jet li slam - dunking everyone in sight !
the film also moves fast ( a mere 95 minutes ) , develops a certain " cute " chemistry between fonda and li , has nice surroundings
( paris , baby ! )
and gives us one of the best bad guys that i 've seen all year .
tcheky karyo is the devil incarnate in this film .
he is pure evil .
they should have called this movie bad lieutenant 2 as keitel has nothing on this man .
what a great , great monster !
my favorite line of tcheky 's was when li was explaining the whole " kiss of the dragon " thing to him
and he cut him off by saying " kiss my ass !
" pure action movie poetry .
anyway , other than him , jet li also handled his " acting " pretty well in this film , with very little real dialogue to say , but enough to make us believe his character .
actually , just looking into the man 's eyes generally tells you a lot .
fonda was also pretty good , despite playing one of the most trashy and abused women that i have seen in quite some time , but i still felt kinda bad for her
, so i guess she did her job
okay .
but in the end , nobody goes to see this kind of movie for oscar performances .
we go to see jet li movies because we want to see jet li kicking a lot of ass from side to side , and this film delivers gangbusters on that front .
and yes . . .
they have no wire - fu in this movie .
. .
i say again . . .
no wire - work , no bullshit stunts with li floating around in mid - air for over a minute .
it 's all straight action , fist to fist , boot to face and all around cool stunts .
if that 's what you 're looking for ,
i do n't see how you will be disappointed with this film .
yes , it 's not very original in plot ( just take luc besson 's own la femme nikita and mix in plenty of his own the professional et voila ! ) , does have an annoying hip - hoppy soundtrack that just got on my nerves after a while ( i also would have gotten rid of the whole acupuncture thang . . . ) and will have anyone not willing to restrain their disbelief , rolling their eyes all over the place .
but was i entertained ?
thoroughly .
does the film feature more gunplay , martial arts and over - the - top kills that most recent action flicks ?
yes , again .
does this sound interesting to you ?
well , the answer to that question is entirely up to you .
one thing that i would definitely recommend is , as jet li pointed out himself on his website , that you leave the kids at home for this one .
in fact , you might even wanna
leave yourself if you ca n't handle the more violent of sequences .
all in all , a rippin ' , roarin ' fun time !
where 's joblo coming from ?
black mask ( 5/10 )
- blade ( 7/10 ) - la femme nikita
( 8/10 ) - lethal weapon 4 ( 7/10 ) - the matrix ( 8/10 ) -
the professional ( 9/10 ) - romeo must die ( 3/10 ) - rush hour ( 7/10 ) - shanghai noon ( 6/10 )

Ex Output:
P


Ex Input:
" varsity blues " is the best film of 1999 thus far .
unfortunately , it is also the first film i have seen from 1999 .
it is another one of those small - town sports movies that involves a flawed , but good - heartedfrom 1999 .
it is another one of those small - town sports movies that involves a flawed , but good - hearted protagonist ; a rough and meanspirited coach ; and the " big game .
"
by the end , will the underdog overcome great odds and triumph ?
will everyone in the town turn against the coach ?
will the team win the climactic game ?
do cats bathe themselves regularly ?
the so - called " hero " in question is john moxin ( james van der beek ) , a senior at west canaan high school who plays for the varsity football team , but is really just hoping to get a scholarship at brown university so that he can get out of the dead - end town .
at least he 's got the right idea , since west canaan , texas is portrayed in the film as , frankly , pathetic , with the whole town treating the weekly football games as the second coming .
heck , in one scene , the front page of the town 's newspaper is proclaiming about the west canaan badgers ' big win the night before .
when the team 's star quarterback is severely injured , tearing the ligaments in his leg , john finds himself taking over as the team 's leader , but his few minutes of glory do not last long , as he begins to have problems with his girlfriend ( amy smart ) when she discovers he spent an evening with another girl ( ali larter ) . and after staying out all night with his drinking buddies at a strip joint ( all of the teenagers in the film are portrayed as raging alcoholics ) , the team loses their second - to - last game , putting john at feuds with the coach ( jon voight who , like gary oldman , is overstaying his welcome in the typecasted role as the " bad guy " ) .
worse yet , the coach is threatening to ruin john 's scholarship chances if the badgers do n't win their final game .
the plotting of " varsity blues " is as old as the hills , and contains every cliche in the book .
admittedly , i was never exactly bored while i was watching it , but i hasten to add that i was rarely ever entertained
.
throughout , all i could really think of is how virtually the same exact story had been filmed with a great deal more thoughtfulness and maturity in 1983 's " all the right moves .
" one of the biggest problems
i had with the film is how little of interest any of the characters actually were , least of all certainly not john , who , played by van der beek ( of tv 's " dawson 's creek " ) , is pretty much a bore without any engaging qualities .
while i probably should n't blame this on van der beek , since the inauspicious and
" by - the - numbers " screenplay by w .
peter iliff is n't of any help , he is still certainly not in the league of tom cruise in " all the right moves .
"
the story revolving around john , meanwhile , is extemely thin throughout , particularly for its 104-minute running time , and it alternates between uninspired comic relief ( as in when the students see their sex education teacher working as a stripper at the club ) and heavy - handed melodrama .
the romance between john and his girlfriend had the potential to be an adequate subplot , but we also learned very little about her , which is unfortunate since amy smart , whom i do n't think i 've seen before in past films , is probably the only character written with any sort of intelligence .
smart does not allow her character to become the " passive girlfriend , " instead coming off as a young woman with her own ideas and opinions .
it 's too bad the camera did n't linger on her long enough
so we could hear some of those thoughts .
the adult characters probably fare the worse of any , since they all must play residents of a dim - witted town that cares about nothing but football .
john 's relationship with his parents can also be telegraphed far in advance .
his father is set on him becoming a football player at a university , but john does n't want any part of that .
his mother stands beside her " big , strong husband " and is a passive female .
finally , jon voight plays the stock bully coach character and he does nothing to make the thankless role any more than one - dimensional .
saving " varsity blues " from being a total washout are a few amusing sequences , including one set in the sex education class , which did get a laugh out of me .
the scenes of playing football were well - shot and thankfully did n't overstay their welcome , as many sports films fall victim to .
but leaving the theater , the question i had in my mind was why did this film need to be made ?
i seem to be asking this question quite a lot lately , since the same old stories seem to be cranking out of hollywood .
do we really need another high - school sports film ?
no , we do n't , and certainly not one of this low - caliber , which felt like a cut - and - paste job of spare parts from much better , but similar , films .
" varsity blues , " no doubt is the first one , however , to include an earnest scene in which one of the characters is only wearing whipped cream on their private parts .

Ex Output:
N


Ex Input:
welcome to your oh - so typical sequel .
it tries to be twice as big as it 's predecessor , yet ends up twice as shallow .
shallow . . .
.
hmm . . .
now there 's an idea .
maybe if the ill - fated cruise liner in this movie had struck a shallow reef early on things may have turned out better .
the first thing that struck me . . .
and surprised me , was that the camera work ( for the opening sequence anyway ) was terrible .
looked like the cameramen were drunk and kept tripping on their own feet . . . . . .
very different to the original movie .
the characters ?
well , not many of the characters actually * had * characters , but here 's a rundown .
annie , who was the highlight of the the original , must have seriously banged her head in the train crash at the end of the first movie .
why ?
because something 's got to account for her losing that many iq points .
even though annie was n't exactly a rocket scientist in speed , here some of her actions just make you want to beat your head against a wall .
for instance , after successfully using a chainsaw to cut a hole in a door so that a group of people can escape noxious gases - she stands in the middle of the opening for about five minutes till someone reminds her that the people ca n't get ut till she get
's the chainsaw out of their faces .
. .
. bang bang bang in point of fact sandra 's character is turned into little more than one of those scantly dressed extras from hercules , who constantly has to be rescued .
jason patric ?
all i can say is bring back keanu .
keanu reeves might have the emotional range of a tree stump . . .
but that 's one more tree stump than jason has .
i do n't think he changed facial expressions all movie - jason , smile for the cameras ! !
now frown ! . . .
i said frown . . . .
oh . . .
you are . . .
bang bang bang . .
wooden just does n't describe this guys performance , but it 'll have to do .
the bad guy .
. .
. . ahh . . .
william dafoe - there 's a bright move .
how can you go wrong with the star from that acknowledged classic , body of evidence ?
( yes , that is sarcasm ) .
his wide eyed maniac of a character does n't start out too bad . . . .
but goes steadily downhill
as the movie progresses .
in the end he degenerates to chasing annie around for a hostage , even though he already has the money and can escape . . . .
bang bang .
though i 'd like to give this movie a double thumbs down , there were some nice sequences .
considering the movie cost over 100 million dollars - you 'd hope there 'd be at least a couple .
the real eye - popper for me , even though it was given away in the trailer .
.
. . bang bang . . . .
.
was the sequence where the cruise liner sideswipes the oil tanker .
this looks terrific and i was very surprised to hear that the cruise liner in it was . . . .
completely computer generated !
wow . . . .
i do n't think i 've ever seen a cg model look so real before .
the sequence where jason patric in trying to disable the propellers from under the ship is also terrific , and the only time during the entire movie where you get that feeling of . . . .
speed .
this lack - of - speed problem affects many sequences .
such as the oil tanker part . . .
. .
it was -
" oh no , we 're going to hit the oil tanker ! " , 20 minutes later -
" oh no , we 're going to hit the oil tanker !
" 20 min . . . .
you get the point .
this movie failed simply because it did n't live up to it 's name . . . .
there was very little feeling of speed .
in the original movie , the lead characters had to make split second decisions to survive . . . . .
in this movie it felt more like - " well people , we 're gon na run into that there island in a few hours - i think i might stroll over to engineering and see if i ca n't turn off the engines .
. .
i 'm passing the cafeteria on the way , can i get anybody anything ?
"
the ending of this movie really is terrible .
even though it features what i 've since found out is one of the most expensive sequences ever in a movie - it just does n't work at all .
the part where the liner crashes through the town looks very realistic , but . .
. . surprise surprise - it just takes waaaaay too long .
it seemed to go for 15 minutes before the ship finally stopped .
one thing that struck me as extremely poor scriptiing was that as the ship crashes through the harbour and town , around 25 people are killed by the ship . . . .
and there 's
only 15 or so people left on the ship .
so when it stops safe and sound and the characters are all cheering - the audience is sitting back and thinking - " wait a sec . . .
this is a happy moment because ?
"
bang bang
then there was the dog . . . . .
i almost fell out of my seat when i saw the bit with the dog dodging the falling debris .
putting a dog in peril has become the ultimate hollywood cliche . . . . . .
every movie seems to have a ' dog - in - danger ' sequence - volcano , dante 's peak , independence day , daylight , twister .
lost world . . . . . .
etc , etc .
this movie is a perfect example of how not to make a sequel .
director jan de bont should try watching the orignal movie and this one back - to - back and see if he realises where he went wrong .

Ex Output:

N