We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Example Input: But it's easy to see that a less violent environment, incuding representations of violence, would help speeding the educating process and avoiding some bad issues.
Example Output: Valid

Example Input: Saying the death penalty is morally equivalent to abortion because they both involve kiling is like saying rape is morally equivalent to making love because they both involve sex.
Example Output: Valid

Example Input: The death penalty may have been an effective scare tactic when the legal system was less convoluted and lynch friendly, or when executions were public, but as of now it is nothing more than an anachronism.
Example Output:
Valid