In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

[EX Q]: Comment: Those same fisherman also leave the state with the profits that are not subject to an Alaska income tax.
[EX A]: Non-obscene

[EX Q]: Comment: Oh, I agree, but I was commenting on the horrible idea of Sarah Palin as Sec. of the Interior. She'll be out shooting the fricking buffalo!
[EX A]: Obscene

[EX Q]: Comment: When you have an organization which says "Black Lives Matter" whenever  police shootings are involved, how can the fact of the race of the dead person not be relevant enough to put in a headline?

Especially in a State where only 2.3% of the population is black and most of that population is in Portland?  

Not mentioning the race of the alleged victim could be construed as white censorship.

As in: "We don't want people to know that white cops are killing black kids!"

Pick your headline and justify it.
[EX A]:
Non-obscene