The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.

Context: 'I would do this instead: 3 firewood, 1 water and 2 food.' 'That's not going to be a fair offer, you'll need to do better than that or I don't think we can come to an agreement' '3 firewood, 1 water, 0 food'
Utterance: 'so I'll get 2 water, 3 food and 0 firewood?'
No

Context: 'Kindly understand our need as we are struggling with hunger now.' 'At the same from my side. We need foods because my child is hunger' 'We with our kids undergone fasting in the recent days, so we are hungry to the peak'
Utterance: 'What did you expect from me? Because same position is here also'
Yes

Context: 'Hi. I'd like to have all the food packages for my children and two of firewood. Will you accept it🙂🙂🙂' 'I apologize but that will not work. I have a diabetic and need to make sure they will have enough food for a hike. So I would like to take two food packages, one water, and two firewood. '
Utterance: 'That won't work. Because, we are planning for a campfire. And so, we are in need of fire wood. I hope you understand.🙂🙂🙂'

Yes