instruction:
Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
question:
My heart goes out to all of the victims and their families.  Unfortunately there are people who think that being anything but not straight is the worst thing you can do, so they don't think the slaughter is that horrible. 

On the other hand, there are people convinced that this is an act of terrorism and that means that everyone who is Muslim, etc is a criminal that deserves punishment. 

Hate results in tragedy. Please don't let this tragedy turn into more generic discrimination. This was a sick person who would've done something horrible no matter what. His victims and his background do not define the problem. 

We should be mourning as a nation. We can't figure out how to deal with all of these competing opinions...gun control, sexual orientation, religion, terrorism. Try to respect each other, even if we disagree.
answer:
Yes


question:
There is a ton of data on bird collisions which are a decent analog to drones.  I worked on a Twin Otter that hit a seagull at ~ 120 knots.  The hit was on the leading edge of the wing, centered on a rib, strongest part of the surface.  The wing was caved all the way back to the spar, ~ 2 feet aft.  The deice boot was destroyed and significant trim was required to roll the aircraft back level.  Yeah, a drone would be  a nasty encounter.
answer:
Yes


question:
The problem is, the Internet can so quickly and efficiently spread *mis*information, too ...
answer:

No