In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: threat and non-threat. Threat is a statement that someone will be hurt or harmed, especially if the person does not do something in particular.

[EX Q]: Comment: Oih, you burned the liberals with that scathing observation. 
You are like a wordsmithing genius except for syntax, spelling and not very smart
[EX A]: Non-threat

[EX Q]: Comment: Trump: "I don't believe it." Based on what? Gut feeling or just denial that something might just be there? Something could have truely happen without his knowing. That would be actually believable but to just say "I don't believe it" leads a reasonable person to think you are covering up. Buffoon. What till a real crisis comes up that requires critical thinking skills without just pushing the button!
[EX A]: Non-threat

[EX Q]: Comment: Motley, really, I expect better of you. This is below your standard. 

First, I know you know the difference here, the clear what-about-ism. Obama is history, this is today. Even if you believe Obama did wrong, that wouldn't justify Trump doing wrong. 

And second, I've seen enough of your comments to be sure you know that Trump was sending a message to law enforcement; he will have their back if they scoff at federal judges and violate the constitution as long as it's on the right side of his bias. This was code for 'I am racist, and I am president, our side won, so to hell with judges, to hell with the constitution.' 

He could have made it about clemency. He could have excused it, said it was wrong, but this old guy thought he was doing right, and he's too old for jail. But he didn't. He said defying court orders and scoffing at civil rights was "doing his job."

You know better.
[EX A]:
Non-threat