The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the no-need strategy, otherwise output No. no-need is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used when a participant points out that they do not need an item based on personal context such as suggesting that they have ample water to spare. no-need can directly benefit the opponent since it implies that the item is up for grabs.

Example Input: Context: 'Yes, does that work for you.  I could give you 1 water and 2 foods as I really need the water for my hike.  I tend to overheat easily. ' 'You are flipping it around. I can't give you 2 water and 2 firewood as that wouldn't really be fair ' 'Okay, how about if I give you 3 foods and you give me the 2 firewoods and 2 waters?'
Utterance: 'THanks, but I really need the water. I thought you would enjoy the food with so  many guests in your campsite. Is that a possibility?'
Example Output: No

Example Input: Context: 'Hi, 🙂 It's nice to meet you as well: I also hope we can work something out: Food is my excess trip priority, What is yours?' 'Mine is firewood with second being food.' 'I'm definitely willing to give up some food for some firewood: That seems like a place where we can come to an arrangement: Would you like to make an opening offer? '
Utterance: 'Sure!  I figure I can go with little water as we can get it from the stream and boil it.  So for water I would be willing to give you 2 packages.  Would that be fair?'
Example Output: Yes

Example Input: Context: 'Hello. ' 'Hi! How are you doing today?'
Utterance: 'I'm fine. And yourself?'
Example Output:
No