Categorize the comment on the basis of toxicity. If the comment is toxic (harmful, malicious, derogatory, threat, insult, identity attck, etc.) output Yes, otherwise output No.

Why does ADN repeat same post over and over for response? The editor is an idiot. Civil discourse? Choking up time.
Yes

I find it ironic Andre that you asked for my discretion when you were worried that making public the concerns you shared with me would have an adverse impact on your potential employment situation several years ago. Remember? Hypocrite much? And despite the widely acknowledged successes electorally and policy wise of the AFL during my tenure you have taken multiple occasions to say how dumb and unreasonable I've been. Please be specific.
Yes

Who:  I certainly didn't say "all Christians" were operating Ponzi schemes either.  I am  not a member of Mr. Shockley's church (or any church), but I do know he was very involved and active in that church.  You note that "someone of such low character was passing themselves off as a Christian."  You think that's bad.  Based on your assertions (unsupported, by the way) it seems that, even worse, "someone of such low character was (also) passing themselves off as a Democrat."  These damn lowlifes; they're giving both the Christian Church and the Democatic Party a bad name.  Whatever shall we do?

Yes