In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine the neutral choice based on your inference from the statement and your commonsense knowledge. The neutral choice is a sentence that neither agrees nor disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3', corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence. If sentence X agrees with sentence Y, one's correctness follows from the other one. If sentence X disagrees with sentence Y, they can not be correct at the same time.

Ex Input:
Statement: Why not just abolish all the laws that are supposed to protect These folk; because if you do not have legal services, the laws are unenforceable and useless. Choices: 1. These folk need legal services to protect them. 2. There is no way to enforce the laws with no legal services. 3. The people can protect themselves against the law.

Ex Output:
1


Ex Input:
Statement: No hint of sinister doings. Choices: 1. Nothing seemed suspicious. 2. Signs of evil activities were everywhere. 3. No hint of drug use.

Ex Output:
3


Ex Input:
Statement: as you indicated you don't have too much input into the area it it just so happens that uh our daughter-in-law is Panamanian and uh we have been in Panama and i have worked in El Salvador and we visit Mexico occasionally so  yeah we we do have a little information on it here but uh Choices: 1. I have been to Panama, El Salvador, and Mexico. 2. While in Panama we visited with my daughter-in-law's family. 3. The only place we have been is Panama.

Ex Output:

2