instruction:
The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.
question:
Context: 'okay well I will take 2 foods and 2 firewoods then ' 'Thank you so much for understanding, I'm fine with that.' 'I guess that works out good because I need firewood to cook the extra food'
Utterance: 'I get it as you will be having additional packages of food, so I will have only 1 of each'
answer:
No


question:
Context: 'Yep.  I am excited.  I could really use the decompression and time away from society. ' 'I agree, can't wait to unplug. As far as supplies go, I think its going to be hot and sunny where I'm going, wouldn't mind a bunch of extra water.' 'Water is extremely important to me too.  I can give you 2 waters if you give me all 3 firewoods. '
Utterance: 'Hmm, ok, thats pretty fair. I do have a larger group going as well, so would it be okay if I got 2 extra food then?'
answer:
Yes


question:
Context: 'hi, i am doing well' 'cool, the family is looking forward to the camping trip this weekend' 'same, I will need 3 food as I need food to survive, in return, you can have all the water'
Utterance: 'My kids are really eager to make s'mores and tell stories by the campfire. They do need some food though. But i am willing to give you the 3 food for 3 firewood and 2 water if that works for you?'
answer:

Yes