In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.
--------
Question: Comment: I certainly hope you run for governor, Robin. Bill Walker will be too busy building our Gasline to Nowhere to run again. I agree we should put your plan to a vote if the legislature doesn't BY THE END OF THE SESSION!  Then, it's initiative time!  Audits, audits, audits must be collected on!!!!  Deficit, my ass!  Collect what is ours and screw the CBC. Burch, Chenault, Micciche, Moriarty and their toadys and lackeys can spit into the wind.

Answer: Sexual-explicit


Question: Comment: Justin Tanoue: I'm laughing my mother f***ing A$$ off!!!!

Thank YOU for providing my morning coffee-through-the-nose moment!!!!

Answer: Sexual-explicit


Question: Comment: And you are still wrong. An individual’s right to have a political or terrorist supporting cake is not protected.
You have offered zero proof to back up your ridiculous opinion.
If a bakery makes cakes with pictures of people on it, that does not mean they have to make a political cake. 
I would love for you to offer some sort of proof, but you have failed miserably so far.

Keep trying, but maybe find something besides your opinion that backs up your opinion.
Maybe you should go to a bakery, pretend to be a nazi and ask for a swastika cake.

Good luck with that.

Answer:
Non-sexual-explicit