In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence can be inferred from the statement. Incorrect choices change the meaning in important ways or have details that are not mentioned in the statement. Indicate your answer as 1,2, or 3 corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.

Ex Input:
Statement: oh okay well you remember Sam Perkins when he was in North Carolina don't you Choices:  1. Sam Perkins was awful until he was with North Carolina. 2. Sam Perkins has never been to North Carolina. 3. Sam Perkins was with North Carolina.

Ex Output:
3


Ex Input:
Statement: namely uh replacing putting the catalytic converter back on the car Choices:  1. A part of the process was replacing the catalytic converter.  2. I have a lot of experience with repairing cars. 3. The catalytic converter has never broken.

Ex Output:
1


Ex Input:
Statement: And it is impossible to see how this difference from Rust has any bearing upon the First Amendment question, which, to repeat, is whether the funding scheme is 'manipulated' to have a 'coercive effect' on those who do not hold the subsidized position. Choices:  1. It is not possible to see how this difference from Rust has any bearing on the First Amendment question. 2. The difference from Rust on the First Amendment question is very noticeable. 3. The question that was asked it really rather very subjective.

Ex Output:

1