Categorize the comment on the basis of severe toxicity. If the comment is severely toxic output Yes, otherwise output No.

Example Input: Then tax demolition and gentrification at a rate that will suppress the increase in the growth rate.
Example Output: No

Example Input: How on earth has a sixth-rate hack like Tyler Hurst been allowed to spew his half-assed, ad hoc bullshit on a once-respected news/lifestyle forum like WW for this long? Is he paid for this shit??
So you like smoking weed, Tyler Hurst?? GREAT! Want to defend that position with false equivalencies and paper-thin logical fallacies (cannabis is "legal" therefore it should be LEGAL!!!)? Fuck you! Like pretty much everywhere else, in Portland you can't blaze a joint in a public spaces, bars, restaurants, malls, cider houses, Forever 21, or wherever the fuck you spend your free time. Having second thoughts about LOBU 26 or whatever your shitty apartment complex is called because smoking weed violates your rental contract? Renegotiate that shit, or move somewhere else! After all, we're all free to live wherever we want, right??
Should there be a cannabis club scene in Portland? Absolutely. Focus on the defensible, dipshit, and leave this city ASAP.
Example Output: Yes

Example Input: Let that fat chimney smoking fireplug of a legislator sleep on his damn couch then. Maybe he'll be as uncomfortable as the rest of us Alaskans waiting to see how he'll play out our future.
Chicken shit partisan politics with no inclination to compromise as I see it. The governor has extended more than an olive leaf "written in pencil". Chennault and his schlubs have not even offered up a revenue plan in the past six months for our future fiscal security as a state. VOTE 'EM OUT!
Example Output:
Yes