In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: threat and non-threat. Threat is a statement that someone will be hurt or harmed, especially if the person does not do something in particular.
--------
Question: Comment: He cant say anything the Muslims are his bread and butter for votes and cash support. Quebec is his other bread and butter votes and his other cash so he cant risk pissing off either side. Like others said if this was any other province he would have been all over it, the two-faced arse.Time to kick this two-faced Mr dressup to the curb.

Answer: Threat


Question: Comment: Sadly in rural Alaska, particularly in Southwest Alaska due to SB91, there is nonexistent prosecution for SA. I have seen SA1, penetration without consent, dropped to harrassment. No kidding. Get raped, the guy gets out in six weeks. It is done to protect the sexual offenders from having sex crimes on their records. And only once in 40 years have I seen someone prosecuted on the 3-strikes your out sex law. You can have all the laws on the books you want, but if the DA's, Public Defenders and judges collude to NOT prosecute, what are you going to do?

Answer: Non-threat


Question: Comment: nea: is your comment intended to make sense in this reality? Then you'd best re-read it and try again.

Answer:
Non-threat