The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the self-need strategy, otherwise output No. self-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to create a personal need for an item in the negotiation, such as by pointing out that the participant sweats a lot to show preference towards water packages.

Context: 
Utterance: 'Hello. '
No

Context: 'You are being very kind then, im elderly so trying to make fresh water by boiling it from getting it from a river was concerning to me. How about you take all three of the food for your kiddo's' 'That sounds fair. The kids can bathe in the stream. We are good with 2 food packs.' 'Lol, wish i could. Then you take all 3 of the firewood, I'll take 2 of the Water and 1 of the food, sound good?'
Utterance: 'Just to be clear, I get 3 firewoods, 1 water and 1 food. You get 0 firewood, 2 waters and 2 food packs?'
No

Context: 'I hear that. What do you think of if I take 3 of the food supplies and you can have two waters? ' 'That sounds like a fair compromise. I can get food by hunting animals, old school style. That would give you 4 total items. In that case it's only fair if I take all 3 of the firewood. 4 for me and 4 for you sounds like a good deal to me. 🙂' 'That sounds fair to me! I don't know the first thing about hunting so that would be a relief on me. We took a bunch of blankets so we'll be good on firewood.  🙂'
Utterance: 'Yep and I need all 3 firewood because I'm hunting. Meat absolutely needs to be cooked. The same cannot be said about pepperoni pizza and chips for example.'

Yes