The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.

[Q]: Context: 'Same here haha. Is water your lowest priority item too?' 'Yes. We think we have enough water for now.' 'Same here! I am in need of food more than firewood however as I am very hungry. '
Utterance: 'Me too. We have a bigger family and we will run out of food if we don't get some more.'
[A]: Yes


[Q]: Context: 'do you have a particular item preference?' 'I do.  I have been looking everything over and feel this won't be to hard to come to an agreement' 'Well my camp places a premium on water.  How would you feel about for me: 2 water, 1 food, 1 firewood?'
Utterance: 'I think we're on the right track.  I am bring my 2 kids with me and they eat everything in sight.'
[A]: Yes


[Q]: Context: 'I could make that work 🙂 I'm sorry if I came off mean, I'm just trying to make sure I'll be ok. I don't camp often, so I'm not sure how to prepare.' 'I understand. What are you using the extra food for?' 'I brought some pre-packed snacks, and a few sandwiches. I'm hoping there are no hungry animals around. What about you?'
Utterance: 'I was hoping to get some extra food for some picky eaters, but if they are hungry they will eat!'
[A]:
Yes