In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence can be inferred from the statement. Incorrect choices change the meaning in important ways or have details that are not mentioned in the statement. Indicate your answer as 1,2, or 3 corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.

Example Input: Statement: The thundering Republican condemnations of the special prosecutor back then are just like the thundering Democratic condemnations today, down to the very phrase, four years and $40 million. Choices:  1. The thundering Republic condemnations back then are similar in many ways to the thundering Democratic condemnations of today.  2. The thundering Republican condemnations are in no way similar to the thundering Democratic condemnations. 3. The thundering Republican condemnations are four years and $40 million. 
Example Output: 3

Example Input: Statement: twenty year old and he uh he's in love with this girl that's about sixteen or seventeen and they leave he's involved with like a murder and then um he they go to uh they go to like Louisiana and Texas and uh he get they get more he gets more involved with this robbery and whatever but it's sort of Choices:  1. He is innocent in Louisiana and Texas. 2. A twenty year old is in love with a younger girl. 3. A twenty year old is suspected of murder and robbery.
Example Output: 3

Example Input: Statement: A Post news analysis asks whether Clinton can use his talent for political positioning to actually implement policy. Choices:  1. A New York Times new analysis asks about Clinton. 2. Clinton is known for using his talent for policy. 3. An analysis wonders whether Clinton can use his talent for politics or policy.
Example Output:
3