We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

[Q]: Where do we draw the line, afterall we could forego any trial by jury and just go with the police report.
[A]: Valid


[Q]: And 83% seems to be the common error rate for "innocents" claims by death penalty opponents.
[A]: Valid


[Q]: Were I to argue in front of the Supreme Court (and I confess I have no idea what I'd wear) I would take the position that Life Imprisonment without the possibility of parole is Cruel and Unusual.
[A]:
Valid