In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.
--------
Question: Comment: So if I don a sombrero and serape at a Mexican restaurant while they sing Happy Birthday to me, is that oppressing Mexicans?

Answer: Non-sexual-explicit


Question: Comment: If the Democrats had any brains they would never "block" a Supreme Court nominee just based on ideology.  If they are not qualified that is one thing but if they are not a left winger that is nonsense.  Maybe the Republicans should then block any leftie from the court who is otherwise qualified.  This kind of stuff is what ruins our entire system and makes people not trust it at all.  We want good judges who are not buried in ideology but can rule on the facts and the law.  How hard is that?  Often, it is much easier than checking a potential ruling against a certain ideology.  Try it!

Answer: Non-sexual-explicit


Question: Comment: And from another article in the RG this morning, an AirBNB host who refused to rent to an Asian tells us, "That's why we have Trump . . . I will not allow this country to be told what to do by foreigners."

Answer:
Non-sexual-explicit