Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.

[Q]: The money = speech plus corporations = people are monumental mistakes. For me it's a matter of fairness and equality. Why should some people/entities get more free speech and influence than anyone else? It feels wrong in the marrow of my bones. It's part of why we are in the mess we are in both nationally and statewide.
[A]: No


[Q]: http://www.alternet.org/media/watch-samantha-bees-brilliant-takedown-nras-absurd-priorities

It turns out the NRA restricts it's eagle mascot costume more than they restrict guns. Go figure.
[A]: No


[Q]: What I find most interesting about this article is that the "Washington Post" printed it and posted it ten days ago.  When I saw it, I wondered why the RG didn't pick it up then?  Saving it for a rainy day or holiday weekend I guess.

I always find it amusing that the folks in these types of stories go about their daily lives bothering nobody and then when a story about them living their lives as they choose comes out, they become the enemy for the "all knowing" and "enlightened".  The splash of the article then dissipates, the "all knowing" and "enlightened" move on with their lives and thoughts, the folks mentioned in the article do the same, and the two never knowingly meet.
[A]:
Yes