instruction:
The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.
question:
Context: 'In that case, I would be fine trading the extra food for a water. so you would get 2 waters and 2 foods ' 'Hmm, that works for me. So basically, you get 1 food, 1 water, and 2 firewood? I get 2, 2, and 0. If that's right, I agree.' 'Yea, so that about right, but i get 3 firewoods'
Utterance: 'Oh, yeah, sorry, mistyped that. Okay, let's do it then. Was good talking.'
answer:
No


question:
Context: 'I'm doing well. I'm looking forward to going on my camping trip but will need some additional items to make sure the trip is safe, healthy, and enjoyable. ' 'Same here. ' 'I have diabetes, so it is very important to me that I get extra packages of water and food. When I'm at home, I always need to pack extra drinks and snacks for myself in case I go into shock and need to take medication. The trip could be very dangerous for me if I don't have access to these additional supplies. '
Utterance: 'Actually mine own purposeful need is firewood and water. Being on a first time adventure, I lack these items as I was inadequately prepared.'
answer:
No


question:
Context: 'Hello I would like to have two bottles of water and in trade will take 1 food and firewood for a higher amount of water.'
Utterance: 'Hello. I would consider giving you 2 waters for 3 firewood and 2 food. I have a large family so the additional firewood will help with warmth and cooking food. 🙂'
answer:

Yes