In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

[EX Q]: Comment: She was a "deeply flawed person" because of her actions and her choices - private email servers and more than 33,000 deleted emails; allowing American embassy personnel (including the ambassador himself!) to be viciously murdered in Benghazi, despite their repeated requests for more security; decades of controversy and investigations tied to her and her husband.

But more seriously, she was "deeply flawed" because of her political positions: pro-choice, pro-late term abortion, pro-gay "marriage", pro-Obamacare, pro-embryonic stem cell research, pro-tax, anti-religious liberty, anti-Catholic, anti-free market, anti-business...she would have continued the trend of pushing this nation and its citizens to the extreme political left, all the while demeaning and insulting those who disagreed with her ("deplorables") and never once trying to persuade, just use the power of government to coerce and impose.

Her flaws had nothing to do with her gender, and everything to do with her character.
[EX A]: Non-identity-attack

[EX Q]: Comment: So basically Doug is saying that the Christians who run the west with their War against Drugs, War against Sex, Sin , freedom of speech and even men are just as radical as the Muslims in the east with their intolerant attitude toward freedom of speech, gays, and women?
[EX A]: Identity-attack

[EX Q]: Comment: Trump and his friends certainly do have a self serving bias - hence cognitive theory applied to them.

However, that does not mean that the comments of fake news levied at the NYT, CNN, G&M, etc. are untrue.  In fact. both of these things very well could be true.  Yet, with the MSM we see this come out every day as true, as in true fake news..

Look, we all know the media is biased in one way or the other.  Some are biased to the right and some to the left.  But the amount of overt bias during this campaign and the printing of stories that did not have a fact to back them up by the NYT was just overwhelming.  

It would almost seem to me to be the case of the Fake News not liked being called Fake News.  And the NYT doesn't need to do this.  Just report facts.  Let the reader make up his  her own mind.  Believe me, we can do it.  At least yours is an opinion piece so we know that your words don't have a shred of fact.  But hey, it is entertaining.
[EX A]:
Non-identity-attack