Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.

[EX Q]: ya know ...I think that is a pretty accurate, concise assessment.  it is why the campaign agenda/promises are never fully carried out if at all.
[EX A]: No

[EX Q]: what is with the ugly glass buildings going up here?  who thinks this is good looking?  like the glass is going to reflect blue skies, sunshine?  no - they will always look "cold" at best and in the winter here - being just one more gray thing they looks like depression.  does anybody besides the design firms and the people who sign off on these projects actually think they are attractive?,  ***can't help but think every time I look at this , it is truly, truly ugly and this from the art socialites in eugene?  It just looks plopped down, inappropriate and frankensteined.
[EX A]: No

[EX Q]: OK.  It seemed you were taking umbrage at the remarks of others that were somewhat critical of the editorial in question.  Implicit in that was an agreement with the editorial position, i.e., women are systemically disadvantaged in the labor market re: wages, and Society is obliged to "do something about it".  But if I over-interpreted your remarks, I apologize.
[EX A]:
No