We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Q: They are carried out in a fit of rage, or fear (such as in the case of a thief shooting a police officer or citizen during a robbery).

A: Invalid
****
Q: Deterrence is not the only reason I support the death penalty.

A: Valid
****
Q: just pointing out that you argue to eliminate the death penalty, but your argument is tagged as 'Hang 'em high'

A:
Valid
****