We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

[EX Q]: Sent1: If we don't stop the death penalty before we try to fix it, the imperfect system will continue to convict innocent people while we determine what is best for it.
 Sent2: The fact is that as long as we have a death penalty (the only Western nation to have it), we will execute innocents with the guilty.
[EX A]: Similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: therefore the death penalty should not be used, simply because it kills innocent people.
 Sent2: some of the innocent people that have been executed in the
[EX A]: Similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: You are probably going to murder somebody; hopefully it will b in a place with the death penalty and then you will get what you deserve.
 Sent2: I highly doubt the backing of why you personally would want the death penalty invoked is because you're worried at home that a mass murderer is going to escape and kill you or someone you love... seriously?
[EX A]:
Not similar