instruction:
In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.
question:
Sentence: Steve follows Fred's example in everything. He influences him hugely.
 Reason: The 'He' refers to fred because Steve is following Fred; He must be the one being influenced. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
answer:
Correct


question:
Sentence: Sam took French classes from Adam, because he was eager to speak it fluently.
 Reason: The 'he' refers to sam because SAM THAN ADAM MORE LIKE. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
answer:
Wrong


question:
Sentence: Fred watched TV while George went out to buy groceries. After an hour he got up.
 Reason: The 'he' refers to fred because he has always been a little bit of a 'little bit' guy, but George is the one. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
answer:

Wrong