In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine the neutral choice based on your inference from the statement and your commonsense knowledge. The neutral choice is a sentence that neither agrees nor disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3', corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence. If sentence X agrees with sentence Y, one's correctness follows from the other one. If sentence X disagrees with sentence Y, they can not be correct at the same time.

[Q]: Statement: Julius nodded, and continued: " 'How did it happen?'   Choices: 1. Julius shaked his head screamed "I know how everything happened.' 2. 'How did the accident happen?' said Julius. 3. How did it happen?' Said Julius while nodding.
[A]: 2


[Q]: Statement: which surprised me that that uh through the jury discussion they were able to convince him against his original opinion so maybe that speaks well for juries Choices: 1. Jury discussions never change anyone's opinions.  2. Jury discussions often result in people changing their original opinions.  3. Through jury discussion, they were able to convince him to abandon his original opinion; perhaps that speaks well of juries. 
[A]: 2


[Q]: Statement: The Portuguese also sailed down the west coast of Africa, going beyond Cape Bojador in 1434, a feat theretofore considered to be impossible. Choices: 1. The Portuguese failed to sail down the west coast of Africa beyond Cape Bojador.  2. The Portuguese benefited greatly by going this route. 3. Before the Portuguese accomplished going past Cape Bojador, it was believed to be impossible to do so.
[A]:
2