In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: insult and non-insult. Insult is any lanugage or act that is disrespectful or scornfully abusive.

[EX Q]: Comment: Good point, any theocratic philosophy is a threat to constitutional democracy. Canada had a  blasphemy law. 

Violent theocrats are much worse - regardless of their religion. 

I only meant to say that The Premier was probably referring to violent Muslim theocrats which is essentially what an Islamist is. But the term is too close to Islamic and ends up stereotyping the religion. 

Given that the Ottoman empire ended just 100 years ago,  the link to religious rule is more recent in Islam. About the same time the Federal Reserve was created in America and they are still fighting about that!
[EX A]: Non-insult

[EX Q]: Comment: Pitts is a race barker without any proof of racism!
[EX A]: Insult

[EX Q]: Comment: dumb old chump is a narcissistic walking catastrophe. the working stiffs of america elected a wolf in sheep's clothing.  just look at the robber barons he has appointed into key economic positions.  his family appointments scream of conflicts of interest.  but no matter.  a scandal will shorten his term like it did nixon when he got too friendly with china and russia, a no no in the military industrial establishment of america.
[EX A]:
Insult