Categorize the comment on the basis of toxicity. If the comment is toxic (harmful, malicious, derogatory, threat, insult, identity attck, etc.) output Yes, otherwise output No.

Ex Input:
Having been on Hagemeister and seeing first hand the devastation, the only word in your diatribe that is accurate is 'stupid'. Another example of this man made ecological disaster is at the south end of Umnak Island where feral cattle and sheep have disturbed an archaeological site that is considered the oldest in the Aleutians. I've been there and helped rebury remains that were exposed from the animal caused erosion. To see literally hundreds of remains, exposed hearths and middens was deeply disturbing.

These animals have no value other than to a bored crabber and should be removed. They are no better than rats.

Ex Output:
Yes


Ex Input:
The writer did not mention illegal immigration. If you are referring to the writer's characterization of Trump as a racist, there are more factors here than his over-the-top approach to that problem; specifically, his completely reprehensible proposal to ban Muslims from entering the country. Maybe "racist" isn't the best word; I prefer "xenophobic".

Ex Output:
Yes


Ex Input:
These idiots need to do three things: suspend all oil company subsidies for three years, pass a 5% sales tax with a three year sunset clause, and suspend the PFD and send the money to the state budget until the budget is balanced.  Pretty simple.  Do it.

Ex Output:

Yes