In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine the neutral choice based on your inference from the statement and your commonsense knowledge. The neutral choice is a sentence that neither agrees nor disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3', corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence. If sentence X agrees with sentence Y, one's correctness follows from the other one. If sentence X disagrees with sentence Y, they can not be correct at the same time.

Ex Input:
Statement: in a briefing, prior to an in-depth study of the implementation of the Bail Reform Act of 1984. Choices: 1. The briefing was held on a Saturday in a cold function room at the Hilton Hotel.  2. There was no such briefing about the Bail Reform Act of 1984.  3. There was a briefing about the Bail Reform Act of 1984. 

Ex Output:
1


Ex Input:
Statement: Moreover, requiring legal services attorneys to monitor their clients' movements and formally withdraw whenever the client left the country would creating extraordinary burdens for the LSC grantees, the clients, opposing parties, and the courts. Choices: 1. There would be huge burdens upon LSC grantees if attorneys had to monitor their clients.  2. There is no burnen in attorneys monitoring their clients.  3. The LSC lawyers are extremely overworked. 

Ex Output:
3


Ex Input:
Statement: Are the Journal editors trying to say that Dole would have won the election if not for people who are--or might go--on welfare? Choices: 1. Is the message that the Journal editors are trying to convey is that Dole could've won the election? 2. Many people on welfare or close to going on welfare came out and voted against Dole.  3. The Journal editors are saying that the poor people had no effect on Dole's losing the election. 

Ex Output:

2