We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

[EX Q]: D you really want more bullshit to corrupt the future?
[EX A]: Invalid

[EX Q]: Well, you already admitted you can't with your "holding their guns in shaking hand, just waiting to shoot whoever comes through the door" statement.
[EX A]: Invalid

[EX Q]: DNA technology could be required for the death penalty making it far less likely that an innocent is sentenced to death.
[EX A]:
Valid