We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

[EX Q]: Sent1: I am "for" capital punishment... but if a criminal shows a desire for death over a life sentence, I prefer to be sadistic.
 Sent2: I do not support the death penalty - but it's not because I feel bad for criminals.
[EX A]: Not similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: The question is should the death penalty be allowed as a form of punishment.
 Sent2: Death penalty should be allowed for those who deserves it.
[EX A]: Not similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: There are many reasons the death penalty should be abolished.
 Sent2: If anything, this kind of "argument" is an argument for abolishing the death penalty, since it isn't used uniformly across the entire country.
[EX A]:
Similar