instruction:
In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence can be inferred from the statement. Incorrect choices change the meaning in important ways or have details that are not mentioned in the statement. Indicate your answer as 1,2, or 3 corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.
question:
Statement: The double sepulchre of Jean sans Peur and his wife, Marguerite de Baviyre, is also lavishly sculpted, although more stylized. Choices:  1. Jean sans Peur's wife was Marguerite de Baviyre. 2. Jean sans Peur was only married once. 3. Jean sans Peur was never married to anyone.
answer:
1


question:
Statement: Anyone who knew Tony Lukas even slightly was deeply impressed by his boundless, open-minded curiosity about the injustices of modern life, along with his stubborn reportorial integrity about getting to the very bottom of any story as best he could. Choices:  1. Tony Lukas was an elitist.  2. People who knew Tony Lukas were impressed by his curiosity and integrity in the news field.  3. Tony Lukas was open minded, curious and stubborn. 
answer:
2


question:
Statement: Also, new information not only needs to be useful, but also needs to be understood by investors. Choices:  1. Information that is added in must have value and be comprehensible by its users. 2. If new information is added to the regulations then it needs to be comprehensible and usable. 3. New information should be confusing and useless.
answer:

1