In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Input: Consider Input: Comment: Jones has no "style", just rant.

If Coulter modified her style, she'd be taken more seriously by what some would call Mainstream people presumably those giving "funnies" here--and with a good degree of validity. She makes some great observations about her country, its policies and people. Trouble is, she does it with a sledge-hammer.

Output: Non-obscene


Input: Consider Input: Comment: Interesting. The CBC ministry of truth. The MSM manufactured truth. Truth and nothing but the truth. 
"Tell the truth" says Will Smith.
The truth is the truth and when you have a good truth it's because it's the truth.

Output: Non-obscene


Input: Consider Input: Comment: I'd like to see some studies on the oppression of women wearing face coverings, and incidents in Afghanistan where terrorists wore them. If these women truly are proven to be free of abuse and oppression and no terrorists have ever posed in them (NOT!) maybe it could be dropped, >Otherwise, authorities need such a law on the books, for use in appropriate circumstances such as emergencies, suspicious circumstances, to fight abuse, etc.

I believe it was Oprah who introduced modern nations to the Afghan use of the burka when she showed footage of women under blue coverings being herded like animals and beaten with sticks, in the streets of Kabul, circa 2001. Who could want this sickness anywhere?


Output: Non-obscene