Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
--------
Question: Daniel, enough already....it is ALASKAs oil, not the oil companies....maybe they should just up and get the hell out and we could use some of OUR PF to pump the stuff....The oil companies (including you) either need to S*** or get off the pot.

Answer: No


Question: I hope both the hospital administration and the doctors can find some common ground so that both parties will be able to continue to be wealthy. I'd hate to see one of these doctors have to trade in their BMW for a Chevy Malibu.

Answer: Yes


Question: " at that point we’re talking cold blooded murder."

 Fortunately the majority of American citizens, and the Supreme Court, disagree with your opinion, as that is all it is. If your dislike of our current law is this strong, perhaps you should write a summary and argument opposing it, and get it submitted for review by the courts, best of luck in that endeavor.

 As an American citizen, one could argue, we have a moral obligation to challenge any and all laws, and or regulations we find disagreeable, however we also have the responsibility to abide by those laws and regulations, up and until they are reversed or overturned.

Answer:
Yes