We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gay Marriage)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

[EX Q]: Sent1: If you don't like the fact that gays want to have the same marriage rights and benefits as heteros, move to a middle-eastern country - you'd fit right in there if your latest posts say anything about you.
 Sent2: To claim that homosexuals have equal rights is to decieve yourself; marriage has a set of restrictions that precisely say, "If you want to be married, you've got to stop being homosexual."
[EX A]: Not similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: When anyone can marry anyone else then homosexuals should be allowed to marry.Until then gays should not be an elite sexual deviant lifestyle over other sexual deviant lifestyles.
 Sent2: I do not want gay deviant sex to be considered anything other than that, deviant.
[EX A]: Similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: Gays can enter into civil unions, straights can enter into civil unions.
 Sent2: What I am saying is that if the term "civil union" was utilized unilatterally, meaning for all legal unions gay or straight, I would have no problem with it.
[EX A]:
Similar