We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Q: Sent1: I dont believe that someone who killed or raped a lot of people should be able to live even if they are in a jail surrounded by other criminals.
 Sent2: What if there were people killing other people, escaping from jail, doing it again etc.

A: Not similar
****
Q: Sent1: I see what you mean, but i'm still against killing people .
 Sent2: I find it quite strange that no one bothered to ask why you why are against killing people...

A: Not similar
****
Q: Sent1: The argument for the death penalty as a deterrent has been proved wrong by the implementation of it through history.
 Sent2: Furthermore, any assertion that the death penalty is not a deterrent is false.

A:
Similar
****