In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence can be inferred from the statement. Incorrect choices change the meaning in important ways or have details that are not mentioned in the statement. Indicate your answer as 1,2, or 3 corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.
--------
Question: Statement: And it implies that the Harlem racket reverted to local control. Choices:  1. This shows us that the Harlem racket is under national control again. 2. That shows us that the Harlem racket is under local control. 3. We got what we wanted - the Harlem racket is under local control again.

Answer: 2


Question: Statement: Congress discovered through experience, however, that these restrictions did not exhaust the politically controversial uses to which LSC funds could be put. Choices:  1. LSC funds cannot be used for politically controversial things. 2. LSC funds can be used for politically controversial things like campaigning. 3. LSC funds can be used for politically controversial things.

Answer: 3


Question: Statement: Indiana differs from many other states in that the Indiana planners have made considerable progress in the last few years beyond the reconfiguration of the LSC funded programs but, unlike other states, Indiana does not have a formal State Planning body. Choices:  1. The State Planning body of Indiana results in a much tidier urban environment. 2. The Indiana State Planning body has achieved very little progress and has not been able to reconfigure LSC supported programs. 3. Other states tend to have formal planning bodies, whereas Indiana does not.

Answer:
3