We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Input: Consider Input: And no, I do not claim that there are trials that can determine innocence after execution...we hold those while they are alive, and before they are sentenced to death.

Output: Valid


Input: Consider Input: If it must be, then we shall find a way to improve these peoples habits, not kill them because they aren't 'like us'.

Output: Valid


Input: Consider Input: So in reality, pushing the death penalty only ensures that more innocent people will be murdered.


Output: Valid