In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Input: Consider Input: Comment: It's unfortunate that you only interact with women with whom you pay to perform sex.  The woman who resides in the White House is a whore (a profession with which you seem quite familiar).  She received payment for marrying the offensive ogre that many consider our president.  Now, that we understand your limited intellectual abilities, shut the fuck up!

Output: Sexual-explicit


Input: Consider Input: Comment: So get busy!  Kill snails and slugs.  Kill rats or get cats that are raters.  Wash your greens really well.  Break the life cycle.

Output: Non-sexual-explicit


Input: Consider Input: Comment: It was an illegal lease.  Get out of that building and sue for the money bilked.  Somehow, our leaders have been captured and are still enamored with the great developer/ landlord/ pocket liner.  How tone deaf can they be.  That building will always be the Taj MaHawker.  And as long as the legislature is in there, the resentment will simmer and will not fade.  How freaking tone deaf can our public officials be?  Even the city.  None of them should be touching that building with a 10-foot pole, brokering a deal, etc.  What, Pfeffer and Acre get private audiences with the whole leadership apparatus, and gets to pull the strings?  Was Gottstein or anyone from the public there to voice the public's interest?  Let it go to market.  The free market.  And get out from under the stain and attempt to stand up for some of our public dollars that have been squandered.  This article made me scream out at breakfast this morning, "Motherf***ers!"


Output: Sexual-explicit