We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Example Input: Sent1: I don't even give a shit about the death penalty, I was just making a point.
 Sent2: The death penalty right now is to easy even I think.
Example Output: Not similar

Example Input: Sent1: maybe we should start with what crimes warrant the death penalty.
 Sent2: And it seems that every time we start talking about the death penalty, that we end up talking about whether or not it deters crime.
Example Output: Not similar

Example Input: Sent1: Rehabilitation is one goal that one has for punishment but other goals might include:
 Sent2: I have a entirely different view as to what the goal of capital punishment should be.
Example Output:
Not similar