The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the self-need strategy, otherwise output No. self-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to create a personal need for an item in the negotiation, such as by pointing out that the participant sweats a lot to show preference towards water packages.

[Q]: Context: 'That makes sense. I'm also interested in firewood, but have a great need for water due to the current weather. ' 'That makes sense. How about we start out with I get 3 firewood, and you get 3 waters?' 'Great idea, that works for me. 🙂'
Utterance: 'Okay, let's do that, and then split the food. Since there are only 3, do you want to flip a coin to see who gets 2 of those?'
[A]: No


[Q]: Context: 'I was going to say, the fire would be probably one of the few things I would be interested in! I love being warm.' 'Well you can take all the firewood if it will help, would it be ok if i get all the food in return?' 'That works for me. How would you like to divide the water?'
Utterance: 'I am ok with you taking two waters since you are new to camping, does that seem fair to you?'
[A]: No


[Q]: Context: 'Hmm okay, I am willing to give you three waters! I was hoping to get 3 firewood though, as it's going to be really cold where I am going.' 'seems like we have same priority items. firewood. I also need firewood most because I am prone to pneumonia ' 'Oh no, I'm so sorry to hear that ☹️ Let me ask about the food first then, would you be willing to give me the 3 packages of that? I am going to have a lot of people with me and we won't be near any stores at all.'
Utterance: 'if i give you all the food items, will you give me the firewood?'
[A]:
No