The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.

Input: Consider Input: Context: 'I was more thinking 2 Firewood for me , 1 food and 1 water? The rest would be yours.' 'That is a promising bargain but I want at least 2 firewood, it makes for a fun time for my group.' 'Interesting , because my group feels the same way though. How does your group feel about water though?'
Utterance: 'Water is not that important for us but the firewood is a deal breaker for us ☹️'

Output: Yes


Input: Consider Input: Context: 'Hello hope you are excited for the trip Im hoping we can discuss the supplies. I would like to get 2 water 1 food and 2 of the firewood ' 'I can give you 2 waters and 1 food, but I really need more firewood. I ran out last time and I don't want to go through that again! How about you take 2 waters, 1 food, and 1 firewood? ' 'I feel like we are almost there I hunt so im ok with the one food; why would  I only get one firewood?'
Utterance: 'I just want to make sure that I don't run out. I will have my kids with me and need to make sure they don't get too cold 🙂'

Output: Yes


Input: Consider Input: Context: 'I dont need the firewood as much. ' 'That is great for me. I guess i will take all three.🙂' 'sure what other preferences would you like '
Utterance: 'I need a lot of water too. Thank you for understanding.'


Output: No