In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.
--------
Question: Comment: No one knows how to gauge te outcome based on the ranked ballot.  But isn't the challenge greater than that?   
Each EDA counts as 100 points and the first candidate to get 16901 points, or more, is the winner.  This means that EDA's with a small number of members carry a lot of weight.  If one candidate has 28% support concentrated in many EDA's with few members, that candidate ha a much better chance than another candidate with 35% support concentrated in a few ridings in the GTA.
This is the same approach the Liberals used to choose Justin Trudeau.  Apparently, he had broad support getting over 80% of the points on the first round.  This time around, it seems like a real crap shoot.

Answer: Obscene


Question: Comment: "Non-PC speak"; right. Like "campaign device" is really right wing spin speak for "huge lie to convince Trump supporters to vote for him."  And "pussy grabbing" is  "just locker room talk"  heard in no real locker room, ever.  How do you define hate speech? I mean, what do the words faggot and nigger and kike and wop, slit, etc mean to you?

Answer: Obscene


Question: Comment: Bigotry is to be opposed whenever it raises its ugly face as it just did in Quebec. Tom Mulcair had the moral fibre to stand up against Harper's anti-niqab campaign.

Answer:
Non-obscene