Given a document, an entity and its sentiment towards the entity, verify if it is the correct sentiment towards the entity. Answer should be yes or no. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

[EX Q]: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Steve Bannon is Neutral . Bill Murray surprised Saturday Night Live viewers this weekend with a guest appearance as  former White House Chief Strategist Steve Bannon .
Appearing in SNLâs âMorning Joeâ sketch with Kate McKinnon playing Mika Brzezinski and Alex Moffat as Joe Scarborough  Murray pulled down the hood of a dark cloak to reveal himself as  Bannon . (In the past  the show has portrayed  Bannon  as a cloaked Grim Reaper character.)
âMy god  Steve  I always thought you looked like death but this is death warmed over â said McKinnon as Brzezinski.  Murrayâs Bannon  was appearing on the show alongside Michael Wolff  the author of Fire and Fury: Inside the Trump White House  played by Fred Armisen.
Murrayâs character denied the statements he made to Wolff that were published in the book â where he said that the meeting between a Russian lawyer and Donald Trump Jr.  along with Trump campaign aides  was âtreasonous.â ( Bannon  has apologized for the statement  calling Trump Jr. âboth a patriot and a good man.â  Bannon  has also stepped down from  his  role as executive chairman at the Breitbart News Network.)
As for political candidates Murray-as- Bannon  said  he  plans to promote next  those include disgraced YouTube star Logan Paul  former drug company executive and convicted felon Martin Shkreli  and the former âSubway guyâ Jared Fogel  who pleaded guilty to possession of child pornography and was sentenced to 15 years in prison.
[EX A]: yes

[EX Q]: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Jerry Richardson is Neutral . It has been a long time since two teams induced as many sofa spasms as the New England Patriots and Pittsburgh Steelers did  with those three false endings in the last two minutes. You thought  finally  the NFL is all about the game again. But just then  the skin-crawly headline came across the bottom of the screen  turning attention away from Tom Brady and Ben Roethlisberger to an old pot-belly named Jerry Richardson.
[Panthers owner Jerry Richardson announces plan to sell team amid NFL investigation]
Yet the viewer’s head swiveled back and forth between the Patriots-Steelers epic in the icing rain  and the alleged fetishes and racial attitudes of Carolina Panthers owner  Richardson  in  his  owner suite. On Friday  the Panthers announced that Richardson was being investigated for workplace abuses  and by Sunday morning  the story had exploded when Sports Illustrated published a host of sordid specific accusations ranging from sexual harassment to using a racial slur against an employee. These included Richardson supposedly asking to shave the legs of female employees and demanding to examine their backsides in their jeans.
But that wasn’t the end of the NFL day. Not thirty minutes after the final play in Pittsburgh  with fans still filing out of the stadium  came the seismic announcement that  Richardson  will be selling the Panthers  the franchise  he  has owned since it was founded in 1993. No explanation was offered  or needed. You have to assume that the disclosures were going to get uglier.
[Analysis: Forget the catch rule. The league has a replay problem] 
Richardson  is a perfect example of the extent to which the sheer girths of owners’ egos are eclipsing what should be the NFL’s true narrative: the game. Their incessant internecine rivalries and power struggles have become a chronic story line. It was  Richardson  who set the poisonous current tone of management-player relations  when  he  declared during the 2011 collective bargaining that the owners had “a [expletive] deal and we’re going to take back our league and [expletive] do something about it.” It was  Richardson  who  inexplicably grown arrogant on  his  Hardees franchise money  sat across a table and barked at Peyton Manning: “Do I need to help you read a revenue chart  son? Because I don’t know if you know how to read that.”
Richardson  no doubt  is also capable of individual kindness  and other owners will profess sorrow over his decision to sell  and wax nostalgic over the fact that he once caught passes from Johnny Unitas with the 1959-60 Baltimore Colts.  Richardson  is a self-made man  the first player since George Halas to acquire an ownership stake. But  Richardson   sadly  has acted as a toxic hardliner devoted to ensuring that no other player would ever be treated like a partner or equal.
[EX A]: yes

[EX Q]: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Brian Krebs is Negative . These terrifying tales sent me looking for a book I had been meaning to read for quite some time. My former Washington Post colleague  Brian Krebs  left the newspaper in 2009 to dedicate  himself  to a blog on cybersecurity: KrebsOnSecurity.com. Out of  his  work and research came âSpam Nation: The Inside Story of Organized Cybercrime â From Global Epidemic to Your Front Door.â
But  Krebs  has made a background believer out of me.
âThe Internet of today is truly a transformative communications and learning tool that radically enriches the lives of billions each day â  Krebs  writes. âYet  never before in the history of the Internet has this medium been more fraught with snares and neâer-do-wells looking to fleece the unwary.
With our spam filters and the constant drilling to not open suspicious emails  weâve been lulled into a false sense of security   Krebs  says.
âThe spam ecosystem is a constantly evolving technological and sociological crime machine that feeds on itself â writes  Krebs . âThus far  the criminals responsible for unleashing this daily glut of digital disease are doing a stupendous job of overwhelming the security industry.â
 Krebs  spends a lot of time introducing the major and minor spam players. Itâs like a Jason Bourne movie but with criminals who donât shoot at folks (well  some do). They instead fire out malicious spam infecting tens of millions of computers and  as a result  rake in millions of dollars.
Waiting for you at the end of the book is a very resourceful chapter on how to protect yourself. Youâll be safer following  Krebs âs three rules for online security:
Even if you donât buy âSpam Nation â make  Krebs âs blog regular reading.  His  reporting will frighten you. It does me. As  he  writes  âthose who endeavor to remain blissfully unaware of their role in becoming part of the solution will almost invariably end up becoming part of the problem.â
Iâm hosting an online discussion about âSpam Nationâ at noon Eastern time on Nov. 2 at washingtonpost.com/discussions.  Krebs  will join me to answer your cybersecurity questions.
[EX A]:
no