In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Example Input: Comment: What? Jeff Sessions isn't good. He's pretty much evil.
Example Output: Non-obscene

Example Input: Comment: Hirono and Schatz would be disappointed with Christ if he ran as a Republican.  The Democrats are in serious trouble.  They've gone so far out to the extreme, they've completely lost their way.  Obstruction is the only thing they think they can do.  Voters will not reward them for their obstruction. Folks elected Trump because they were tired of this continued schoolyard bickering in Washington. Under Obama the divisiveness grew to new high levels.  Americans are tired of this crap.
Example Output: Obscene

Example Input: Comment: Human Rights?  pffft.. who needs to worry about silly little things like human rights?  Trudeau's base hates Trump so clearly there is literally no choice but to divest ourselves into the back pockets of an oppressive nation which -depending on the news cycle- is one of the largest threats to modern civilization.  

Not to worry, it is merely a coincidence that they also happen to be throwing millions of dollars (much of it opaque or laundered) into Liberal fundraising schemes and Trudeau's family 'foundation'.  You know it's a coincidence because they never did it before Trudeau was the hair apparent to the PM's seat.
Example Output:
Non-obscene