In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

Example Input: Comment: ERISA exists because of disgusting attempts like this to hide skull-surgery under the guise of religious freedom. Due on these whites sepulchres!
Example Output: Identity-attack

Example Input: Comment: The sad part is most black people in Baltimore won't do a thing to stop the violence due to being hypocrites. They burned down a portion of the city for a crack dealer (Freddie Gray) when the alleged perpetrators were white, but when black street thugs break into a black US veteran's home and execute him, it's no big deal and just another day in Bodymore, Murderland. No progress will be made until the black community drops the "us vs them" attitude and starts holding their own people accountable for their crimes.
Example Output: Identity-attack

Example Input: Comment: I doubt if it would be possible for someone not born in the Dark Ages to understand less about science than you do. The odds of there being a “gay gene” are practically zero, likely there is no single factor that determines whether a person will be hetero or homosexual. Your silly assertion that people who don’t believe homosexuality is a choice must believe in some here-to-for undiscovered “gay gene” is a classic straw man. As far as your god hypothesis goes there is as much evidence to support your belief in a supernatural being as there is santa clause the tooth fairy and the flying spaghetti monster. Im absolutely fed up with you wanna be iron age goat herders misrepresenting the scientific method. We tried it you way and we got the Dark Ages as a result. No thanks you can keep your silly book of fairy tales.
Example Output:
Identity-attack