In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: toxic and non-toxic. Toxicity is defiend as anything that is rude, disrespectful, or unreasonable that would make someone want to leave a converation.

Comment: The unfortunate problem with appointing pliable idiots to do your dirty work is well...that they are idiots.
Toxic

Comment: Trying to play developer on this property would be disastrous.  Make a plan and sell the dream to someone else who then can take the loss.
Non-toxic

Comment: And is that the way you think free men & women should organize a society? 'Having its leaders selected by a group of unelected and privileged representatives of the duopoly Capitalist War Party? We need TRUE democracy, not more of discredited and corrupt representative government. MOST decisions "our" representatives make are not crisis in nature, and could easily wait for the time it took (a couple weeks at most) to publicize a vote on an issue that could be decided by majority rule. If we had true democracy we'd have gotten fluoride out of our water years ago. Big money influenced our representatives no doubt, and will continue to do so as long as we have a pay-to-play system where it takes beaucoup bucks to run a campaign.
With off-the-shelf technology we could be making decisions the way we bank by phone, and eliminate much of the influence of special interests, like the fluoride lobby. Democracy will have problems, but they will be less than what we've got -- a corrupt oligarchy.

Non-toxic