The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the uv-part strategy, otherwise output No. uv-part is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to undermine the requirements of the opponent. For instance, suggesting that the opponent would not need more firewood since they already have the basic supplies or a suggestion that there might be a store near the campsite where the opponent can get the supplies instead.

[Q]: Context: 'Haha, I know but I am in the same situation! ☹️ and since I am getting less food I feel like it is fair I get on more firewood since I truly need that 🙂' 'Some extra water for coffee might keep us warm, would you consider taking 1 food, 2 wood, 1 water?' 'Sure I can do that 🙂'
Utterance: 'I think we have a deal!!'
[A]: No


[Q]: Context: 'I have a great risk of dehydration.  I really need those 2 extra packages of water. You can have all the extra food.' 'Why do you have a risk of dehyrdation? Because I believe all people do but I do understand some people are at a greater risk then others. Tell me why you are at risk?' 'I have a medical condition that requires medication, and this medication requires me to drink an extra amount of water or else I will dehydrate. '
Utterance: 'That is a problem. Does the medication require the use of fire or firewood as well?'
[A]: Yes


[Q]: Context: 'I would want to keep at least one packet of food for myself, unless you want to just swap 3 firewoods for 3 packets of food, to keep it simple?' 'I like your plan.  It is simple. I will agree to that.' 'So all that is left is water, i guess i should atleast drink alot of it if i wont eat much haha 🙂'
Utterance: 'For sure, and you will need some way to put out the fire. 😮'
[A]:
No