Given a document, an entity and its sentiment towards the entity, verify if it is the correct sentiment towards the entity. Answer should be yes or no. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

Q: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Louis C.K. is Positive . Comedian Louis C.K.’s trailer for  his  new film “I Love You  Daddy” has generated controversy online due to the movie’s theme and its timing following the sexual misconduct allegations against Hollywood producer Harvey Weinstein.
Moretz and Malkovich begin dating which horrifies  C.K.  due to her age.
“She’s a minor!”  C.K.  is seen yelling to Malkovich in the trailer.
Slate called the trailer “icky” while Esquire wrote  “Now is not the time for this  Louis C.K.  movie.”
“It’s honestly a bit shocking to see how tone deaf  Louis C.K.  is in 2017 because  he  was once a comedian ahead of the curve in so many ways ” one social media user tweeted.
“That uncomfortable moment when you start to discover that  Louis C.K.  is slowly becoming Woody Allen ” another Twitter user wrote.
 C.K.  told The Hollywood Reporter last month  “It’s just a f--king movie. We’re depicting oxygen-rich people who live in these beautiful apartments and offices saying whatever they want. Folks say s--t to each other. You can’t think about the audience when you’re making the thing. If you do  you’re not giving them something that came out of your gut. You’ll be making something that you’re like  ‘Is this OK for you?’ And they say  ‘Yes  thank you.’ Mark Twain said something like  ‘You can’t say no one can eat steak just because the baby doesn’t have teeth yet.'”
Like Weinstein  the comedian has also been accused of sexual misconduct by female comedians. Gawker published an article two years ago detailing  the allegations against Louis C.K.  while writer and comedian Tig Notaro told the Daily Beast in August that the comedian needed to “handle  the allegations .”
“I made my move on the red carpet of the awards show ” Koester wrote. “One by one  I would ask a conveyor belt of comedians  all men  'How do you feel about the Cosby allegations?' They would all  invariably  claim to be disgusted by the man's misdeeds. I would then follow up with 'How do you feel about the Louis C.K. allegations?' They would all  invariably  claim ignorance.”

A: no
****
Q: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Kylie Jenner Kylie is Negative . Kara Alaimo  an assistant professor of public relations at Hofstra University  is the author of " Pitch  Tweet  or Engage on the Street: How to Practice Global Public Relations and Strategic Communication ."  She  was spokeswoman for international affairs in the Treasury Department during the Obama administration. Follow  her  on Twitter @karaalaimo . The opinions expressed in this commentary are solely those of the author.
"sooo does anyone else not open Snapchat anymore? Or is it just me... ugh this is so sad  " Kylie Jenner  tweeted the day before.
Earlier this month   Jenner 's picture of  her  baby Stormi got more likes than any photo ever before on Instagram. And celebs don't just capture the attention of America on social media. They also profoundly influence behavior. A 2014 study by Defy Media found that 63% of millennials would take a YouTube celebrity's advice to check out a company or product.
And while celebs sometimes talk about social issues on the Internet  regrettably  it isn't their usual focus. Wouldn't it be better if our conversations on social media focused on things like what our country should do about health care  immigration and the opioid epidemic  rather than what brands celebs like  Jenner  are wearing?
Social media companies should also pay more attention to users themselves. Well before  Jenner 's tweet   more than 1.2 million people signed a Change.org petition letting Snapchat know they didn't like its new layout. If Snapchat had responded to these people faster  the company wouldn't be facing the losses it just experienced.
On Thursday  Snapchat became a victim of the undue influence  Jenner  wields in America. But companies like Snapchat are also part of the solution. They and all of us need to start paying less attention to celebrities and more attention to the people in our society who really matter.

A: no
****
Q: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Jonathan Swift is Positive . Jonathan Swift  we need you more than ever.
This week marks the 350th birthday of the brilliant Irish writer  born Nov. 30  1667. That we know of  Swift  at all is one of the sweetest fortunes of literary history.  His  father died of syphilis before Jonathan was born. A wet nurse whisked him to England for three years. He depended on the generosity of an uncle. He was almost killed by a mail bomb. But despite those precarious turns   Swift  became a poet  a priest  a political operator and  of course  the greatest satirist in the English language.
The longevity of  Swift ’s work is a testament to its potency because no genre fades as quickly: Satires are the cut flowers of literature. Time wilts their wit  fading their bright colors like old political cartoons that poke fun at fat cats we no longer recognize. (Voltaire adored Samuel Butler’s 1663 mock heroic poem “Hudibras ” but try reading it now without footnotes.)
[Jonathan Swift: Not (entirely) the misanthrope you thought you knew]
W.B. Yeats knew what he was talking about when he said of  Swift   “Imitate him if you dare.”
Consider the remarkable persistence of “A Modest Proposal ” published anonymously in 1729.  Swift ’s ironic phrase is such a hardy part of our language that it’s easy to forget how unlikely it is that we’d still be referring to a 3 000-word political pamphlet almost 300 years later. Originally titled “A Modest Proposal for Preventing the Children of Poor People From Being a Burden to Their Parents or Country  and for Making Them Beneficial to the Public ” the essay burns with rage at a privileged class willing to ignore and rationalize human suffering. Although the plight of starving Irishmen may be unimaginable to us today  the centuries have done nothing to mute  Swift ’s savage indignation.  He  still sounds as timely as last night’s “Daily Show.”
If you haven’t read “A Modest Proposal” since high school  look it up again and be astounded. Speaking in the voice of a perfectly reasonable bureaucrat   Swift  begins by describing the piteous state of beggars and their children “all in rags  and importuning every passenger for an alms.” In response to this “deplorable state ”  he  announces a solution  “having no other motive than the publick good of my country  by advancing our trade  providing for infants  relieving the poor  and giving some pleasure to the rich”:
Much of Swift’s essay is taken up with various statistics and logistical explanations  a hellacious spreadsheet of infant flesh to lay out the case for utilizing 100 000 children nursed to approximately 28 pounds each. In those well-modulated sentences   Swift  washes individuals and their pain away. As John Stubbs writes in his recent biography   Swift  possessed an “unequalled capacity to endow a ludicrous line of argument with an air of steadfast reason.” The bloody solution of “A Modest Proposal” is easy to laugh off as a bit of grotesque hyperbole  but the real horror of the essay remains its bland  bureaucratic tone — the same sterile language of accounting that justified American slavery  the Holocaust or any scheme that slices human lives into the columns of a ledger.
If politicians haven’t changed their menu much in 300 years  the rest of us still face the same risk of indigestion. Remember that “Gulliver’s Travels” ends with the intrepid narrator isolated and disgusted. Orwell assumed that Gulliver reflected his creator’s morose character and claimed that  Swift  suffered from a “general hatred of humanity” stoked by a perverse obsession with mankind’s sins and weaknesses. Stubbs argues that the image of  Swift  as a “misanthropic monster” is not entirely fair  but Gulliver’s fate is instructive  nonetheless.
Now that we’re all strident critics trading the day’s outrages across Twitter and the dining room table  how are we to avoid being sickened by our own bitter indignation? The bile in a satirist’s mind must be balanced with hope  or the whole enterprise is doomed. Surely   Swift  wouldn’t have bothered to poke fun at cruelty  incompetence and hypocrisy unless  he  believed  on some level  that such scalding exposure could awaken a better nature.
On  his  350th birthday  it’s good to remember that despair is the satirist’s temptation and the citizen’s poison.

A:
yes
****