In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.
--------
Question: Comment: In the US system, the president has the authority to fill over 4700 positions.  As a president who campaigned on the GOP ticket and as a conservative, he will appoint a considerable number of conservatives.  But unlike here where the PM is constrained by having to choose from a small number of MPs and having to give consideration to racial and regional representations and now, stupidly, having to also choose 50% women and 50% men, the US president can actually choose from the best qualified people to fill specific cabinet - and other -roles regardless of their ideology.   

On Sunday, in front of millions of viewers of 60 Minutes, the Trump children were asked if they would serve in their father's administration.  They all said no, they would concentrate on running the Trump business empire.   

Sorry if conservative appointments offend you and Judith M. so but this is what voters in THE ELECTION (as opposed to the liberal mob rule in the streets) voted for.   

Remain calm.

Answer: Non-sexual-explicit


Question: Comment: "The four justices who struck down Alaska's law spend 64 pages trying to make this argument – and in our opinion, fail miserably. "

Yes, it's your opinion, which I for one don't agree with.  
Realistically, do you honestly think a teenage girl in a small town would get permission from the parent/guardian who abused or raped her?

Answer: Sexual-explicit


Question: Comment: You ignore the fundamental hypocrisy of NAACP that solely and exclusively advocate for blacks or "colored people" (the same 19th C. descriptor used in 1909 and continues). The organization has zero to do with any other Americans. The fundamental crux of "inclusion" is to embrace other people. Like Pacific-Islanders? Native Americans? Asian-Americans? Hispanic/Latinos? Bi-racial? Multi-racial? Undesignated? Get the picture? 

Are we talking about income inequality, access to education, job opportunities or the like? Oh, only for "CP"? The U.S. has the lowest social mobility for people in the middle-and-lower economic classes since the first Gilded Age. When the NAACP or La Raza or the like show up for their "exclusivity" we all lose. Tens of millions of Americans are mired in poverty and transgenerational poverty. Good thing we only look at their skin tone. I guess that's why the NAACP has offices on NA Reservations or Guam/ASamoa/PR?

Answer:
Non-sexual-explicit