We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Q: Sent1: If it must be, then we shall find a way to improve these peoples habits, not kill them because they aren't 'like us'.
 Sent2: When a person does something horrible, we no longer see them as a human that values their life, we just see them as an epitome of hate.

A: Not similar
****
Q: Sent1: The argument for the death penalty as a deterrent has been proved wrong by the implementation of it through history.
 Sent2: There is absolutely ZERO evidence that the death penalty deters crime.

A: Similar
****
Q: Sent1: I do believe in the death Penalty, eye for and eye.
 Sent2: Death penalty is similar to "an eye for an eye, tooth for a tooth"which is too inhuman.

A:
Similar
****