In this task, you will be shown a passage. You need to write a fill-in-the-gap question based on your understanding of the events that might be inferred from the passage. Your question should be answerable based on the passage and only have one correct answer. Show the gap in your question with a _ .

Ex Input:
When a building is on fire, every second counts for the first responders rushing to the scene. A computer-savvy firefighter in North Carolina is hoping a bit of futuristic wearable technology and clever programming can help save time and lives. Patrick Jackson has developed an app for Google Glass, Google's experimental head-mounted computer, which feeds important information directly to the eye-line of firefighters in an emergency. "I'll hear a little notification and can look up into the top corner of my vision and see a map of where it is. I see the location of the incident and what type of call it is," Jackson said.A firefighter has developed a Google Glass app to help first responders save timeThe app displays dispatch and location information on its head-mounted screenWearable technology could soon help firefighters navigate when there's low visibility

Ex Output:
Google Glass has struggled with its public image since _ first made it available to a limited group of developers in April.


Ex Input:
After years of experiencing prejudice in the fashion industry simply because she wears a hijab, Muslim designer Frida Deguise has made a public stand against racism at her fashion show. The 37-year-old Sydney mother-of-four, who was born into a Lebanese family, has been selling and making dresses in Australia for the past 12 years and consistently feels discriminated against due to her cultural attire. On Tuesday, while debuting her first ready-to-wear evening clothing line called Roxcii, Frida made her entrance on to the catwalk wearing a controversial T-shirt emblazoned with the logo: 'I'm a fashion threat, not a terror threat,' aimed at silencing her critics.Muslim fashion designer Frida Deguise has made a stand against racismShe wore a T-shirt with the slogan:'I'm a fashion threat, not a terror threat'Frida has felt personally attacked in the fashion industryShe says she is discriminated against because she wears a hijabShe wants to prove that she doesn't just design Islamic clothing

Ex Output:
Because I'm Muslim, they think all I do is _ wear.'


Ex Input:
(CNN) -- A federal court on Wednesday struck down two provisions of the Patriot Act dealing with searches and intelligence gathering, saying they violate the Fourth Amendment protection against unreasonable searches and seizures with regard to criminal prosecutions. "It is critical that we, as a democratic nation, pay close attention to traditional Fourth Amendment principles," wrote Judge Ann Aiken of the U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon in her 44-page decision. "The Fourth Amendment has served this nation well for 220 years, through many other perils." The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court of Review, set up to review wiretap applications in intelligence cases under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, or FISA, "holds that the Constitution need not control the conduct of criminal surveillance in the United States," Aiken wrote.Judge: Search warrants issued without showing probable causeAttorney seeks ruling after being wrongly linked to '04 Madrid train bombingHis suit says secret searches of house, office violated Fourth Amendment rightsAs part of suit settlement, he retained right to challenge parts of Patriot Act

Ex Output:

Aiken ruled that FISA, as amended by the Patriot Act, permits the government to conduct surveillance and searches targeting _ without satisfying the probable-cause standard in the Fourth Amendment.