In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: insult and non-insult. Insult is any lanugage or act that is disrespectful or scornfully abusive.

[Q]: Comment: Billy Ray Powers:  Most folks are knowledgeable about the wonderful Russian folks we have visited in Russia, and know here in Alaska.  We know you support Donald J. Trump along with many other Alaskans.  Your guy won... woo hoo for you and his faithful supporters! 

The Russians have a government, Putin is a former KGB guy...they are messing into our election process and no one is saying their involvement is why Trump won.  Trump has agreed that the USA deserves to elect someone without Russia or other  outside interference.
[A]: Non-insult


[Q]: Comment: Friedman makes a lot of sense here.  "Lets you and them fight!"
[A]: Non-insult


[Q]: Comment: Hmmm doesn't the "nothing about us, without us" allow the previous era of segregation.?  Don't include and therefore don't even need to acknowledge existence of, doesn't seem to be a great way to integrate populations. Since treating one group as marginal and second class (for example aboriginals in Canada, blacks in US) created so many of the current and historical injustices, why are so many marginalized groups now pushing to have that divide reinforced?  I suppose it might make sense if their culture now had the upper hand and wanted a tit for tat revenge however it doesn't seem to me that they do have the upper hand and that these increased divisions can only hurt the more marginalized in their communities even more than they are now.
[A]:
Non-insult