TASK DEFINITION: Categorize the comment on the basis of obscenity. If the comment is obscene output Yes, otherwise output No.
PROBLEM: Senator, what fools do you perceive us to be? Not one word in your writing about oil, the real cause of our financial woe. You sir, are arrogant, devoid of principles, corrupted by greed, shameless, and nothing more than a paid shill for your employer Conoco. Your employer is part of a cabal to steal Alaska's resources and get hit men  like you to vote to  pay for the theft from the state's treasury on the backs of good Alaskans including children, widows and seniors. It is time for you and your accomplices to go, whether by indictment, failure at reelection, or recall. You insult the intelligence of the readers of this newspaper by trying to pass blame on the few honest legislators standing in the way of the cabal.  The rape of Alaska is nearly a done deal, thanks to you and your ilk, Senator. It must be difficult for you each day to pick which hat to wear, a Conoco employee cowboy hat, Senator's beanie, or "Corrupt Bastards" ball cap.

SOLUTION: Yes

PROBLEM: Thomas Frank, in his recent book "Listen Liberal", disputes the idea that Obama was so constrained by the Republicans that he couldn't do more. He didn't have to put Wall Street execs in charge of his economic program. He also didn't have to leave troops in Afghanistan and kill people in a number of countries with drones. Or make war on Libya, as urged by Clinton. I don't think Obama really wanted to do more. Like the Clintons, Obama is an elite limousine liberal, comfortable with the way things are. After all, it worked for him.

SOLUTION: No

PROBLEM: My Uncle Lucas recently got an awesome six-month old Mercedes S-Class S65 AMG only from working online
 +_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+ +    http://www.factoryofincome.com

SOLUTION:
No