Given a document, an entity and its sentiment towards the entity, verify if it is the correct sentiment towards the entity. Answer should be yes or no. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

Input: Consider Input: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Lubna Hussein is Negative . Lubna Hussein was among 13 women arrested July 3 in a raid by the public order police in Khartoum. Ten of the women were fined and flogged two days later. But Hussein and two others decided to go to trial.
 Hussein said Friday she would rather go to jail than pay any fine  out of protest of the nation's strict laws on women's dress.
 The case has made headlines in Sudan and around the world and Hussein used it to rally world opinion against the country's morality laws based on a strict interpretation of Islam.
 Galal al-Sayed  Hussein's lawyer  said he advised her to pay the fine before appealing the decision. She refused  he said  "She insisted."
 As a U.N. staffer  Hussein should have immunity from prosecution but she has opted to resign so that she could stand trial and draw attention to the case.
 In a column published in the British daily the Guardian Friday  Hussein said her case is not an isolated one  but is a showcase of repressive laws in a country with a long history of civil conflicts.
 Hussein said earlier she would take the issue all the way to Sudan's Constitutional Court necessary  but that if the court rules against her and orders the flogging  she's ready "to receive (even) 40 000 lashes" if that what it takes to abolish the law.

Output: no


Input: Consider Input: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Steve Bannon is Positive . The Dec. 12 special Senate election in Alabama is being touted as the next clash in the ongoing battle between  Steve Bannon  and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell for the soul of the Republican Partyâwhat  Bannon   with characteristic hyperbole  calls a âseason of war.â Roy Moore  the GOP candidate  stands accused of numerous incidents of sexual misconduct  including allegations that he molested a 14-year-old girl. Thatâs prompted McConnell  a Kentucky Republican  and most of his GOP colleagues to disavow him.  Bannon   by contrast  was Mooreâs most important ally in the wake of the sex scandal  at least until President Donald Trump took to Twitter to weigh in on Mooreâs behalf.
McConnell knows that having an accused child molester in the Senate would be toxic for his partyâs image  and that Mooreâs stubborn recklessness would make his own job next to impossible. For  Bannon   one suspects  this is the whole source of Mooreâs appeal.
Bannonâs stated rationale for backing Moore is that heâll help carry out the populist revolt that the former White House chief strategist is attempting to lead against McConnell and the GOP establishment. Itâs an odd claim to make  since Moore is less of a âpopulistâ than a âtheocrat.â He was twice kicked off the Alabama Supreme Court  once for refusing to remove a Ten Commandments monument  the other time for refusing to grant marriage licenses to gay couples. Whatâs more   Bannon  has a more powerful weapon to deploy that really does align with  his  professed politics and would all but ruin McConnell:  He  could oppose the Republican tax plan.
 Bannon  rose to prominence by espousing a brand of Republican politics that differed sharply from what party leaders such as McConnell and House Speaker Paul Ryan were pushing. Instead of tax cuts for the wealthy and slashed entitlement spending   Bannon  thought the GOP should become a âworkersâ partyâ focused on strengthening the middle class. This idea was so popular with conservative voters that when Trump took it up  he won the Republican presidential nomination. It also helped  him  steal blue-collar voters from Hillary Clinton in the general election.
Since  his  inauguration  however  Trump has consistently deferred to the same Republican leaders whose priorities  he  exposed as being out of step with the rest of the country. Nothing illustrates this better than the tax plan McConnell and his allies are frantically trying to rush through the Senate.
In sum  the GOP tax plan makes a mockery of what  Bannon  and  his  followers claim to stand for by directing its major benefits to the kind of plutocrats who donate to McConnell and his Republican colleaguesâone reason the plan is deeply unpopular with most voters. A recent ABC News poll found that 60 percent of Americans think the plan favors the wealthy  and just one in three support it.
So far  Bannonâs populist revolt has met with only middling success. Although heâs pledged to run insurgents in 2018 against every GOP incumbent but Ted Cruz  a strong slate of candidates has yet to emerge. One place  Bannon  has succeeded  though  is in tarnishing McConnellâs image among Republicans. Polls consistently show the majority leader to be the least popular member of the Senate  and an Oct. 24 Harvard-Harris poll found that most Republicans wish  he  would resign. If McConnell canât pass a tax bill  he may have to.
Given this vulnerability   Bannon  could use his influence and platform at Breitbart News to highlight the plutocratic skew of the GOP plan and demand that its spoils be redirected to the ordinary workers who elected Trump. Calling on Republicans to swap out the estate tax repeal  carried interest breaks and cuts for millionaires for  say  a payroll tax cut aimed squarely at the middle class would put McConnell in an impossible bind  while providing  Bannon  the dual benefits of being broadly popular and entirely consistent with  his  and Trumpâs 2016 campaign message.
Instead   Bannon  has been raging at McConnell without doing much to inhibit his agenda. He may yet carry Moore to victory. But if McConnellâs tax plan becomes law  thereâll be little doubt as to who is the true victor.

Output: yes


Input: Consider Input: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Rex Tillerson is Negative . PALO ALTO  Calif. (Reuters) - U.S. Secretary of  State Rex Tillerson  said on Wednesday the United States is receiving evidence that international sanctions are âreally starting to hurtâ North Korea  and praised China for putting pressure on Pyongyang.
South Korean President Moon Jae-in had attributed North Koreaâs recent willingness to talk to South Korea to the pain of sanctions   Tillerson  told an event at Stanford University in California.
 Tillerson  said that  he  was confident the pressure would eventually bring North Korea to the negotiating table over its nuclear and missile programs. Pyongyang has carried out nuclear and missiles tests in defiance of United Nations and other sanctions.
âWe are getting a lot of evidence that these sanctions are really starting to hurt  â Tillerson  said  citing intelligence and anecdotal evidence from defectors.
 He  said Japan told a conference on North Korea in Vancouver on Tuesday that more than 100 North Korean fishing boats had drifted into its waters and two thirds of those aboard them had died.
âWhat they learned is that they are being sent out in the winter time because thereâs food shortages and they are being sent out to fish with inadequate fuel to get back â  he  said.
China did not attend the Vancouver meeting  where 20 nations agreed to step up sanctions pressure on North Korea  but  Tillerson  highlighted Beijingâs role.
âWe have never had Chinese support for sanctions like weâre getting now â  he  said.
 U.S. Secretary of State Rex Tillerson  arrives for a photo op during the Foreign Ministersâ Meeting on Security and Stability on the Korean Peninsula in Vancouver  British Columbia  Canada  January 16  2018. REUTERS/Ben Nelms
Slideshow ( 5 Images)
 He  said it was possible North Koreaâs presence âmay be their early effort to break the ice.â
âWeâll see - nothing may come of it â  he  said.
 Tillerson  said of North Korea leader Kim Jong Un: â he  knows how to reach me  if  he  wants to talk. But  he âs go to tell me  he  wants to talk. Weâre not going to chase  him .â
 Tillerson  said  he  was confident the sides would eventually get to the negotiating table and  he  wanted to know when that happened that the United States had âvery  very strong military options standing behind  me .â


Output: no