In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

Sentence: Adam can't leave work here until Bob arrives to replace him. If Bob had  left home for work on time, he would be gone by this time.
 Reason: The 'he' refers to adam because I believe it refers to Bob, because Adam is already there. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Wrong

Sentence: Sara borrowed the book from the library because she needs it for an article she is working on. She writes it when she gets home from work.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the article because The Book has more information than an article. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Correct

Sentence: Kirilov ceded the presidency to Shatov because he was less popular.
 Reason: The 'he' refers to kirilov because of his closeness to Russian President Vladimir Putin. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

Wrong