We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gay Marriage) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gay marriage. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gay marriage.

Q: After all the sex that has happened out there, gay sex or straight anal sex (which actually has more participants than gay anal sex), if somebody could "get sick" from it, they would have by now.

A: Valid
****
Q: Let the government decide this on a purely constitutional or legal basis (because that 's its function).

A: Valid
****
Q: The bottom line is that all these examples (3 or more in marriage, marriages to underage participants, men and men or woman and woman marriages, etc.) are all examples of removing criteria for what makes marriage unique.

A:
Valid
****