We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Example Input: Sent1: The death penalty has never been shown to be a deterent to murder.
 Sent2: If the death penalty were an adequate deterrent then we would not have murder.
Example Output: Similar

Example Input: Sent1: If we can not prevent the innocent from unjust punishment, we should not have the death penalty.
 Sent2: The fact is that as long as we have a death penalty (the only Western nation to have it), we will execute innocents with the guilty.
Example Output: Similar

Example Input: Sent1: The person having been convicted of a crime punishable by death and subsequently sentenced to death should be put to death.
 Sent2: while it is a fact that innocent people have been placed and convicted to death row condemned to die, there are however people who are guilty and should die.
Example Output:
Not similar