TASK DEFINITION: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.
PROBLEM: Comment: What the heck are you even talking about. The Constitution is the Supreme Court's job. To interpret it and uphold it, as written. Not come at it with some kind of activist perspective that Hillary thinks would be good policy. What was she right about?

SOLUTION: Non-sexual-explicit

PROBLEM: Comment: another Thurstonian:  Listen Bub,  we're not talking about "chasing one unicorn"  we're talking about chasing THREE MILLION unicorns.....and they're "out there"...they're in plain sight.  you damn liberals like Paul Ryan just can't see them because you don't WANT TO see them.  I can see them and they're HUGE!!! not only that, but those illegals rode them to the polling places on November 8th.......you didn't see that either did you!!!! what's wrong with you People!!  How can you help "MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN" if you can't see three million illegals riding unicorns to the voting sites.....

SOLUTION: Non-sexual-explicit

PROBLEM: Comment: it's implied in every paragraph. Maybe you are unable to see that but others are not! Wise up. She is an entitled race baiter looking to be a victim. I would throw her trouble maker butt out of my work place.

SOLUTION:
Sexual-explicit