In this task, you will be shown a sentence, and you should determine whether it is overruling or non-overruling. In law, an overruling sentence is a statement that nullifies a previous case decision as a precedent by a constitutionally valid statute or a decision by the same or higher ranking court which establishes a different rule on the point of law involved. Classify your answers into overruling or non-overruling
--------
Question: alvarez-machain'?, cursory analysis contains two errors that lead us to overrule it.

Answer: overruling


Question: reilly, judge  ramsey county district courtfile no. 62-cr-17-1420  lori swanson, attorney general, st. paul, minnesota; and  john choi, ramsey county attorney, thomas r. ragatz, assistant county attorney, st. paul, minnesota (for respondent)  cathryn middlebrook, chief appellate public defender, john donovan, assistant public defender, st. paul, minnesota (for appellant)  considered and decided by bjorkman, presiding judge; larkin, judge; and reilly, judge.

Answer: non-overruling


Question: see, e.g., hyland v. homeservices of am., inc., 771 f.3d 310, 323 (6th cir. 2014) (affirming district court's holding that ""plaintiffs have not pled an alter ego or piercing the corporate veil claim in their fourth amended complaint and cannot now, when faced with summary judgment, assert this new theory of liability"" (citation omitted)); counts v. mk-ferguson co., 680 f. supp. 1343, 1347 n.3 (e.d. mo.) (""plaintiff has not pleaded alter ego liability against this defendant and it would not be possible to hold it liable on this basis given the claims advanced in the second amended complaint.""),

Answer:
non-overruling