In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Example Input: Comment: Your friend Jack has some serious problems.  He claims to be a Christian, he is married and I assume he will say he loves his wife.  How could Jack support a philandering liar like tRump?  And I wonder what it is about America that Jack loves?  He seems to be supporting the destruction of everything worthwhile, from public discourse, our government, our freedoms and our respect.
Example Output: Non-obscene

Example Input: Comment: America created the current world you live in after everything was destroyed in WW2. America dominates because they created the United Nations where all nations of different values can express their view. They dominate because they want everyone to be part of the world. Russia China US each have their unique weak point. Russia wont shoot economically. China and Russia hasn't formed a military alliance yet. Putin put it to me this way at that time: "The end of the world if we use Nukes" and this was my hypothesis that he would shoot strategically if the China fell and balance left them vulnerable to be pick off. China cannot lead until they understand  the positions of other people.
Example Output: Non-obscene

Example Input: Comment: The idea that gay people are given the gift of sexuality, but after being told how wonderful and beautiful it is, are also told that not only can they never use it, but they can't even unwrap it, is both evil and perverted.  A god that would do such a thing is not an entity that I want anything to do with.
Example Output:
Non-obscene