In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Ex Input:
Comment: Sounds like McComas had a few priors but the theft was the only prior that left a victim. He might have tried something stupid that angered the cop. Freedom of information absolutely should be available as soon as it is discovered, for anyone to study. I'm not saying the police are corrupt but they do protect each other. What I fear is the concept of "We have conducted a thorough internal investigation and find no wrong doing on the part of the officer"

Ex Output:
Non-sexual-explicit


Ex Input:
Comment: Don't try to be a comedian.Youre about as funny as your comrades from Russia. Get over yourself commie Parnell.

Ex Output:
Non-sexual-explicit


Ex Input:
Comment: The Judge has been known to have good sources in Law Enforcement. His scoop on Brit GCHQ was right on the money,  even though he was suspended and the Brits claimed "Utterly ridiculous and should be ignored".  Only to be shown as liars by later releases.  Disregard him at your peril.

Ex Output:

Non-sexual-explicit