We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

Another reason kalifornia's ban on open carry being wrong is the application of McDonald into the 14th Amendment of Civil Rights which bars States from infringing in any way on the right to keep and bear arms.
Valid

Let me ask you a question if I might: How do you explain the 2nd Amendment phrase ���the right of the people���?
Valid

How can historians ever look back upon this and agree this was anything more than a raw exercise of Orwellian ���doublethink��� under the guise that the ends must justify the means?

Invalid