Given a document, generate a short title of the document. The title should convey the main idea/event/topic about which the document is being written. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

[EX Q]: Ukrainian presidential hopeful Yulia Tymoshenko on Thursday dramatically raised tensions ahead of this weekend's elections  warning of mass street protests if her rival rigged the polls.
 The comments by Tymoshenko  currently prime minister  raised the spectre of a repeat of the 2004 Orange Revolution protests and injected new venom into her cutthroat campaign battle against opposition politician Viktor Yanukovich.
 "If we are unable to guarantee the honest expression of the people's will and honest results  we will mobilise the people. I have no doubt of this " Tymoshenko told reporters at a press conference in Kiev.
 "If he wants falsifications  we are ready to give him such resistance that he has never seen before  not even in 2004 " she added  referring to the Orange Revolution demonstrations that thwarted Yanukovich's last presidential bid.
 "I ask you not to allow Yanukovich to rape our democracy  our election and our country!" Tymoshenko said in an appeal to Ukrainian voters.
 Yanukovich  who is seen as the frontrunner in Sunday's run-off after he beat Tymoshenko by 10 percent in a first-round election in January  dismissed her threat as an act of desperation.
 "This is a sign of her weakness and an indication that she is losing " he told reporters while campaigning in the town of Kryvyi Rig  located in central Ukraine.
 Tymoshenko said the change would pave the way for large-scale vote fraud  but the Regions Party retorted in a statement that her criticism was "hysterical" and "lies."
 Yanukovich is seeking to make a political comeback by beating Tymoshenko in Sunday's run-off election.
 He was initially declared the winner in the 2004 presidential election  but after the Orange Revolution street protests  Ukraine's supreme court threw out the results and ordered a re-run  which Yanukovich lost.
 Yanukovich is generally seen as the pro-Moscow candidate and his strongest support is in the country's Russian-speaking east and south  while Tymoshenko has the most support in more nationalist western and central regions.
 Tymoshenko has cast herself as the champion of democracy and European integration  but has also been criticised as an opportunist who tacks with the political wind.
 He has sought to improve his thuggish image with the help of US political consultants  after being cast as the villain by the Western media during the Orange Revolution.
[EX A]: Ukraine candidate warns of post-election street protests

[EX Q]: Without suggesting a new path toward Mideast peace  Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton expressed frustration Friday with the Israel-Palestinian impasse while insisting the Obama administration will "not lose hope."
 She said the U.S. will keep pressing for a solution  and she called on Israelis and Palestinians to set aside their differences.
 "It is no secret that the parties have a long way to go and that they have not yet made the difficult decisions that peace requires " she said in a dinner speech at the Saban Forum  a Mideast policy seminar sponsored by the Brookings Institution think tank. "And like many of you  I regret that we have not gotten farther  faster."
 She spoke just days after the administration dropped an effort to persuade Israel to impose a temporary freeze on some settlement activity. The Palestinians insist that direct peace talks cannot resume until Israel halts settlement construction.
 Clinton made clear that she believes the Israelis and Palestinians are ultimately responsible for settling their long conflict.
 "Unfortunately  as we have learned  the parties in this conflict have often not been ready to take the necessary steps " she said. "Going forward  they must take responsibility and make the difficult decisions that peace requires. This begins with a sincere effort to see the world through the other side's eyes  to try to understand their perspective and positions. Palestinians must appreciate Israel's legitimate security concerns. And Israelis must accept the legitimate territorial aspirations of the Palestinian people. Ignoring the other side's needs is in the end self-defeating."
 Clinton did not mention the administration's frequently repeated goal of achieving at least the outline of a final peace settlement by September 2011. That goal was set when Israeli and Palestinian leaders came to Washington in September to resume negotiations -- a process that quickly broke down over disagreement on Israeli settlement activity in the West Bank.
 She pledged to stay actively involved  but she offered no new strategy for achieving the peace deal that has eluded other U.S. administrations.
 "The United States will not be a passive participant " she said. "We will push the parties to lay out their positions on the core issues without delay  in good faith  and with real specificity. We will work to narrow the gaps  asking tough questions and expecting substantive answers. And  in the context of our private conversations with the parties  we will offer our own ideas and bridging proposals when appropriate."
 Before her remarks  Clinton met the Palestinian prime minister  the lead Palestinian negotiator  the Israeli defense minister  Israel's former foreign minister and the U.N. special envoy for the region.
 On Thursday  Clinton held lengthy talks with Israel's chief negotiator. The administration's special Mideast peace envoy will travel to the region next week.
[EX A]: Clinton expresses frustration at Mideast impasse

[EX Q]: But on important issues -- from opposing new settlement building in the Occupied Territories , to supporting the nuclear framework with Iran -- Clinton has not taken the hawkish side , as so many of her liberal critics fear she would do if she becomes president . 
None of this is to suggest that Clinton will be Robin to Obama 's Batman . 
Then there are the issues of wage stagnation and income inequality , two longstanding trends that will likely be at the heart of Clinton 's pitch to voters . 
A recent report drafted by Clinton allies , including Neera Tanden and former Treasury Secretary Lawrence Summers , laid out what David Leonhardt at The New York Times described as the "first draft" of a Clinton economic platform : a mix of improving education , providing direct aid to the lower and middle classes , bolstering child care , strengthening financial regulation , raising taxes on the wealthy , and cutting taxes on the middle class . 
Then there are three issues -- gay marriage , women 's rights , and immigration reform -- that are of immense ideological and electoral importance to the Democratic Party , and can expect an ardent champion in Clinton . 
It depends on whether you see Obama 's foreign policy , which is so entwined with Clinton 's tenure at the State Department , as a disaster for which the U.S. is primarily responsible or the result of organic crises erupting in the Middle East and elsewhere that are largely beyond the administration 's control . 
The fear is that a President Clinton , likely facing a Republican-controlled Congress , will not be content to be the safeguard of Obama 's legacy ; that she will foolishly trade away Democratic priorities like entitlements in some ill-conceived Grand Bargain ; that she will succumb to the many demons whispering in her ear , whether they be Wall Street bankers , neoliberal triangulators , purveyors of hoary Beltway wisdom , or the Wormtongue-like advisers that are always hovering around Clintonland . 
But if Clinton is smart , and I believe she is , she will realize that the days of repealing Glass-Steagall are over , and that her ticket to a historical legacy is to be part of a great era of policy reorientation away from the conservative-neoliberal consensus that has produced decades of middle-class stagnation and one huge financial crisis . 
In contrast , Hillary Clinton , who officially announced her campaign for president on Sunday , will not face the same array of challenges should she be elected -- which is another way of saying that she will have fewer opportunities to remake the political landscape in her image . 
To that end , there are ways Clinton could be a far more effective president than Obama . 
But there is still plenty for Clinton and the Democratic Party to do -- and plenty of space to leave her mark . 
She is also better at greasing her own side with the kind of glad-handing and thank-you-card-writing that Obama constitutionally dislikes -- my guess is that another President Clinton would have an easier time getting her side to fall in line on , say , the Iran deal than President Obama . 
First , simply by virtue of being elected , Clinton could consolidate the gains that Democrats have made in the Obama era . 
At the very least , Clinton would face pressure from her party and her base to protect those reforms . 
Many critics have accused Clinton of helping turn Libya into a failed state , and note that her support for U.S. intervention echoed her support for the Iraq War . 
It is worth remembering that in 2008 , Clinton actually ran to Obama 's left on the issue , which should give progressives hope that policies like the public option and greater subsidies will be on Clinton 's 2016 agenda .
[EX A]:
Why Hillary Clinton would make a good president -- and maybe even a great one .