Categorize the comment on the basis of obscenity. If the comment is obscene output Yes, otherwise output No.

Example Input: You're right. I hadn't considered how the right to private property and protection against unreasonable search and seizure is BS. Thanks for enlightening me. 

Sarcasm aside; with a "put these idiots afoot as bear bait" and "I would do that in a heartbeat" attitude, thank you for leaving the police service. The force is better for it. The state should work to improve the situations that encourage reckless driving on the highway, but allowing police officers that much latitude doesn't respect the Constitutional right to the due process of law. You don't get to play judge and jury.
Example Output: Yes

Example Input: .....that "damned internet"...... there's nothing new about the Shasta behavior.. but now photos hit the web and millions see the selfishness and lack of simple decency..   

Over the years we've had individuals drive out to our rural area, back their pickup up to the bank of the road and dump their trash.  I've worked with Lane County, sorted through the trash with officers and found envelopes, etc with the names of the culprits.  The County has held them accountable.  I'd like to see the authorities sort through the piles of Trashta, find some names and both fine and bill some individuals for clean-up.  

Of course the Greek organizations will assure everyone it "wasn't us."  It would be interesting to see the rental agreements on those houseboats and, perhaps, publish just "who" was there.
Example Output: Yes

Example Input: Under SB 91, not only does she face s presumptive sentence of six years or less, a judge would also be required to release her on unsecured bail. Be sure to write your legislators and show your appreciation!
Example Output:
No