In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

[EX Q]: Comment: FUCK CU
[EX A]: Obscene

[EX Q]: Comment: Your San Francisco ass will be saved by your dog, not by your spray.  Too bad for your dog, but thank goodness the bear and the San Franciscan won't be hurt.  You'll just buy a new dog to scatter his guts to save your ass.
[EX A]: Obscene

[EX Q]: Comment: Fans have no desire for "brakes", nor should they, they are fans after all. Just a few months ago, fans were proclaiming  (some still are) "journeyman", "backup at best", "average ceiling - maybe", "Trevor Orton" and many more less complimentary names and insults. Through all that, a few of us were defending TS, saying "it's too early for those labels" and very few were saying "pump the brakes" then.

So, now that there's more data and the bandwagon is getting dangerously top heavy, nobody really cares (or wants) a safe ride with brakes pumped at every turn, especially when you'er 2-0 on the first 2 turns. Fans want the thrill of being 1st to cross the finish line, with every heart stopping moment and every breath taking spectacle that makes them cling to their seats and squeal for more along the way. That's football, that's entertainment and that's what fans love.

So damn the brakes, full speed ahead! GO BRONCOS!
[EX A]:
Obscene