We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

[Q]: Sent1: You can not use this as evidence that the reduction in crime is due to the gun ban.
 Sent2: It is just a case of prevention, remove guns being so easily accessible and you then decrease the gun crime and remove the need for guns to defend yourself.
[A]: Not similar


[Q]: Sent1: So if its cause people in high crime areas want to buy guns for protection then why do they only want protection against gun murders but not other crimes.
 Sent2: Guns don't kill people, if they did, they would go to jail for murder- not the murderers.
[A]: Not similar


[Q]: Sent1: If you want any protection for your rights, you have to be able to present an argument outlining how they are being violated.
 Sent2: Also if both points are true, would you sacrifice you right to protect your rights with guns (rather than politically) for a crime rate low enough where you don't feel you need a gun for protection?
[A]:
Not similar