We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

[Q]: Sent1: We shouldn't just kill someone if they commit a crime.
 Sent2: So, when someone gets the death penalty, they chose their own fate by committing the crime.
[A]: Not similar


[Q]: Sent1: Firstly there has been no proof that an Innocent man has ever been placed on death row.
 Sent2: The list of men on death row who were found to be innocent and released is long and growing, and we can only guess how many innocents have been put to death.
[A]: Similar


[Q]: Sent1: The death penalty is useless deterrent of crime because in the states that have them, they are not any more inclined to commit a crime because the threat of death penalty particularly if it is murder.
 Sent2: The death penalty is gives the ability to off killers and murderers, as, if they were given life in parole, they have the ability to escape and continue their crimes.
[A]:
Not similar