In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.
--------
Question: Comment: Yes it is.
There are only two sexes.
Male and Female
A boy may feel he is a girl, but that peepee between his legs denotes his sex.
Anything is is just bad wiring.  Sorry, but that's the truth.

Answer: Sexual-explicit


Question: Comment: Yes, suck it did.  It sucked.  Sucked eggs.  Sucked the hind teat.  Sucked like nothing's ever sucked before.

But, for a suck-up like you who's been sucked in since forever, just suck it up and hope you suck out.

Answer: Sexual-explicit


Question: Comment: Actually how you are portrayed is a reflection of what you write in these comments.  

In one comment you are clamoring for people to spoon feed you information and provide basic investor education.  The very kind of stuff you would expect a trader to be well versed in or at least capable of finding for themselves.  Probably 99% of your questions could be resolved if you took literally 5 minutes (or less) to look up using Google.  But then oddly enough your making comments raving about being a successful trader with consistent high double digit returns for the past 15 years in an apparent attempt to ridicule those that follow a dividend based strategy (based on your frequency of being the first and most prolific to comment on all things dividend related).

As I said in another comment - I don't know whether you are simply a troll or completely delusional but for your sake I sincerely hope it is the former.

Answer:
Non-sexual-explicit