We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

Input: Consider Input: Where is your true sympathy for folks like Suzanna Gratia Hupp who were disarmed by government edicts (unconstitutionally) while we arm our enemies of America and gun grabber/anti-Constitutionalists?

Output: Valid


Input: Consider Input: Other felons, such as car thieves, burglars and whomever else can be convicted of felonies without the use of guns might be considered for a reprieve or a complete release from the ownership ban.

Output: Valid


Input: Consider Input: They have repeatedly used Jared Loughner as an example of why concealed carry is a bad idea even though he cannot truthfully be considered a legal concealed carrier.


Output: Valid