In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

Example Input: Comment: Due to lack of Muslims Hawaii is not so dangerous YET.
Example Output: Identity-attack

Example Input: Comment: They are making themselves invisible as individual women, while making themselves very visible as Muslims.
Example Output: Identity-attack

Example Input: Comment: So to break it down, he likes Trump because he's a "disrupter" and "practitioner of crafted chaos."  He could - and did - say that in one sentence. The rest is just meaningless blather. Not that what he did say of substance (if you can call it that) is any better or true. Trump is an insecure, self-serving, opportunistic, mentally unstable, whining, narcisstic idiot-martyr with too much money who got to where he is today by appealing to people of the same character if not money.

Nor do I agree that he is a practitioner of "crafted chaos" - or more honestly,  non-stop, uncontrollable, blatant lying. To be sure some of it is deliberate, but the majority is not.  Trump is "just" a sociopathic pathological liar, plain and simple, and trying to disguise that sordid fact by calling it something sexier like "practitioner of crafted chaos" is not just disingenuous, but a gaslight-like attempt to turn a stinking turd into a rose and sell it to the American public
Example Output:
Non-identity-attack