Categorize the comment on the basis of severe toxicity. If the comment is severely toxic output Yes, otherwise output No.

Wisconsin's ban is a little different, since the Tavern League did later negotiate a 'enclosed smoking room' exemption into the ban meaning if a room had enough windows that could be opened, smoking would be allowed in there. This proposed Alaska smoking ban bill as I understand it at first glance doesn't allow for any exemptions, even including e-cigarette usage inside nor a smoking room exemption. Honestly who cares if some rural dive bars or other businesses want to allow smoking? If a few businesses do and you don't like the fact indoor smoking is permitted, then don't patronize them. Illinois' smoking ban was more restrictive(including casinos and not allowing bars to even have an indoor smoking room for smokers), and a lot of businesses were impacted as a result. Including Harrah's Metropolis Casino in southern Illinois laying off 30 workers, and lots of mom and pop bars closing for good. Good riddance if an Alaska legislative committee chooses to let this foolish bill die.
No

Something for Mr. Minnery to ponder:
   "Just because some jackass is an atheist doesn't mean that his prophets and gods are any less false." 
 -J.R. "Bob" Dobbs-
Yes

No, they are murderers who call themselves Muslims, and who target Muslims for slaughter more than anyone else.  "Islam" is the name of the religion.  The Da'esh do not practice it.

"Why do you say what you do not do?"--Qur'an

Yes