In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Input: Consider Input: Comment: Who gives a darn about the so called three founding nations. There is blatant bigotry and hypocrisy when that term "founding nations" is used as a smoke screen for racism. My family has been here for well over two hundred years. Does that give me license to discriminate against others? No!  If ratepayer’s referendums were the standard for zoning changes, NIMBYs would stop 90 of all development. In this case the referendum was invoked, because of local resistance (code word for racism) to the development. The referendum was used by weak politicians for cover.

Output: Obscene


Input: Consider Input: Comment: That is funny. Thabo Mbeki brought  this ridiculous method of communicating to South Africa. But at least he sometimes tried to convey a real idea. The current crop of ANC politicians use this crazy way of speaking to sound impressive while saying nothing.

Output: Non-obscene


Input: Consider Input: Comment: Cutting off your nose to spite your face is foolish.  It was lost.  Trudeau cut our losses and definitely saved us millions.  Every legal mind in Canada agrees with our PM.  Why would you want us to fight the rule of law and our own Charter.  Trudeau cleaned up an embarrassing mess left behind by Harper.


Output: Non-obscene