We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

[Q]: Sent1: And if you show me where the bible say's to let the murderer go free to kill again, or to treat them with respect and dignity, I'll quickly change my stance.
 Sent2: I'm not suggesting that criminals cannot and do not change...of course they do.
[A]: Not similar


[Q]: Sent1: Life incarceration will never let him kill again, and its cheaper.
 Sent2: After we get through that, if he still retains the death penalty, it's a lot cheaper to kill him than to keep him up 'til he dies in prison.
[A]: Similar


[Q]: Sent1: If these are indeed comparable, I wouldn't argue for the death penalty even in murder.
 Sent2: As far as someone killing while in prison, or escaping and killing innocents, I have addressed this too, and have stated that this is part of the reason I support the death penalty.
[A]:
Not similar