Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.

Q: A President selected by the current House of Representatives.    

In the case of an Electoral College deadlock or if no candidate receives the majority of votes, a “contingent election” is held. The election of the President goes to the House of Representatives. 

Each state delegation casts one vote for one of the top three contenders to determine a winner.  

Since there will  be three 'contenders',  it will depend on how the 452 (one spot is vacant) Representatives vote in each State.  Are there more "Red" States or more "Blue" states?  26 States will be enough to  elect the President.  

Do 'Democratic' State Representatives like Hillary better than Bernie?   Are there enough of either kind to outweigh the number of 'Republican' State Representatives?

Now that would be a can of worms!

A: Yes
****
Q: I've been gone, when do think we last had a beautiful city?    

A thousand free weed whackers circulating in Eugene would go a long way in most neighborhoods.  So much of what I see is simple decay of older structures.

And I would add a lot of individual decisions on property care that goes with very lax standards.  Would asking a person to cut down weeds be a violation of their freedom of choice?

A: Yes
****
Q: I agree 1000% . If only we could have more than the pathetic 30% of usual voter participation.

A:
Yes
****