In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine the neutral choice based on your inference from the statement and your commonsense knowledge. The neutral choice is a sentence that neither agrees nor disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3', corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence. If sentence X agrees with sentence Y, one's correctness follows from the other one. If sentence X disagrees with sentence Y, they can not be correct at the same time.

[EX Q]: Statement: France was developing a national identity of optimism, a high level of social critique, and constant pressure for improvement. Choices: 1. Things were changing for the better in France. 2. France's national identity had become more conservative, focusing on the glories of the past rather than facing the troubles of today. 3. The sense of optimism and pressure for improvement would lead to better living conditions for the poor.
[EX A]: 3

[EX Q]: Statement: This holding not only has no foundation in our jurisprudence Choices: 1. Our jurisprudence is clearly the foundation for this holding. 2. Holdings can have foundations in our jurisprudence. 3. This holding is that all people are entitled to keep and raise chickens in their houses.
[EX A]: 3

[EX Q]: Statement: The second World War was more devastating for Poland than any other country. Choices: 1. Poland was a German ally during World War II.  2. Poland was the country most devastated by World War II.  3. Poland's entrance into World War II was a result of Germany's invasion. 
[EX A]:
3