In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: insult and non-insult. Insult is any lanugage or act that is disrespectful or scornfully abusive.

Input: Consider Input: Comment: I brought up "rape and pillage" -- defined often as "to strip ruthlessly of money or goods" or "plunder".  You twisted it to the strict definition of "rape", not I.  I will give you that Trump wants to change the "standard", not (yet) the "law".  You still haven't owned that you brought up something as happening while Clinton was "in the white house", but the alleged timing of the event preceded Clinton taking office by four years.

I am having a fine day, thank you very much.  I wish you the same.

Output: Non-insult


Input: Consider Input: Comment: Interesting. He sounded like a real scumbag. I hope Monegan does some deep thinking about how to improve the results of the AST hiring process.

That said, Palin was off her rocker to adopt a personal vendetta against the guy for personal reasons. Everyone associated with that family can be written off as trash.

Output: Insult


Input: Consider Input: Comment: As usual, John Hobson illustrates his malicious stupidity by making ridiculous and dishonest statements.
Tell me, Lying John Hobson, do you think alcohol should be banned?  After all, as long as people drink, people will die.  Perhaps from alcohol poisoning, or drinking and driving, which accounts for 1/3 of highway fatalities.  Too often, innocent people are killed by people driving under the influence.
So, if you don't support banning alcohol, according to your defective logic, you must be pro-death.


Output: Insult