Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.

Ex Input:
"Lost a Florida congressional seat in 2010." For his sake, hope he doesn't have any ties to Everbank.

Ex Output:
No


Ex Input:
Excellent piece. People don't realize that it is ultimately the consumer who is pinched by these so-called business-only taxes; they are more or less pass-thru charges that hurt businesses (impairing their ability to compete with companies not exposed to the same taxes), workers (when costs of being in business go up, companies lay off workers), and consumers who pay higher prices for the same stuff as they did before.  Enough is enough. Perhaps the hostile tax environment may be part of the reason that the economy is so services oriented in Oregon. A lot of the Fortune 500 companies have left. The problem with such a services-oriented economy is that it is not very flexible. So, when economic downturns come around every 8 years, or so, the Oregon and other services-oriented economies (e.g. Arizona) is hit harder than the national average; a lot of the money used to pay for those services is sourced from discretionary income.  In recessions, people have less discretionary consumption.

Ex Output:
No


Ex Input:
Excellent observation.  I do have a grudge.... against anyone who doesn't pay their debts (even if its only a Tubman), particularly any public elected official that might let his alligator mouth overload his hummingbird ass.  It really is a simple equation Robin Hood.  If you owe a debt from a lost bet, pay it.  Bill Walker is our Governor, and Sean Parnell is not.

Also, thanks for your unsolicited advice Robin Hood, but please redirect your energy.  Do press on with your primary fictional function of taking from the rich and giving to the poor.  You have much work to do in this country, because the rich keep getting richer and the poor are getting poorer.

Ex Output:

Yes