We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

[EX Q]: Sent1: The bill would also protect gun manufacturers and dealers that have allowed their weapons to fall into the hands of criminals through their own negligence.
 Sent2: The only way to prevent guns from falling in the hands of criminals is by law abiding people buying every gun that is manufactured and thus leaving no guns available for criminals to buy.
[EX A]: Not similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: Now the gun haters that do not believe the 2.5 million lives a year saved by guns.
 Sent2: So even if 2.5 million crimes are prevented by firearms each year then that would be less than 25,000 lives saved by guns each year.
[EX A]: Similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: The language itself is not dubious or ambiguous: ���A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state.�۝
 Sent2: The Second Amendment to the Constitution of the United States America states that, ���A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the People to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.�۝
[EX A]:
Similar