In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: insult and non-insult. Insult is any lanugage or act that is disrespectful or scornfully abusive.

[Q]: Comment: Fuck your mama, and fuck your civility standards! You're fooling yourself with your pretentious standards and you should probably kill yourself. There. Civil enough?
[A]: Insult


[Q]: Comment: I brought up "rape and pillage" -- defined often as "to strip ruthlessly of money or goods" or "plunder".  You twisted it to the strict definition of "rape", not I.  I will give you that Trump wants to change the "standard", not (yet) the "law".  You still haven't owned that you brought up something as happening while Clinton was "in the white house", but the alleged timing of the event preceded Clinton taking office by four years.

I am having a fine day, thank you very much.  I wish you the same.
[A]: Non-insult


[Q]: Comment: It is hard to keep up with Justin Trudeau's acrobatics in making his choices.

So, with the CBC board, Trudeau wants the CBC to employ “merit-based" appointments, that is, to not insist that half of members be women and half of members be men (the way he did with his Cabinet appointments).

And both of those are different from his new foreign aid plan, where the vast majority of money is to go to women and girls, not to males.

How does Trudeau reach his decisions? I mean, does he have a special dice he rolls on his desk, where one roll of the dice might reveal "make it 50% women" and another that says "make it 90 percent women" and another that says "make it merit-based"?
[A]:
Non-insult