Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.

AP reported they have contacted all of the Democratic Superdelegates last week and all but 45 will vote for Clinton.
"She has 520 currently right now. Almost 70% of her current Super delegate count came before the Primary even began. She has gained 161 super delegates since voting began. 
Bernie has 39. He has gained 31."
I was very concerned with the report Bernie supporters are harrassing these delegates.  They aren't changing and Sander's campaign guy Jeff Weaver just said--"none contacted will vote differently."
No

Jade: "modesly" is actually an innovative contraction peculiar to discussion of housing patterns, urban demographics and inner-city residential development.  Its etymology is traced to discussion of "more densely" developed urban centers especially in reference to residential units.  In today's usage you might read "modesly" devloped city centers generally promote more affordable urban residential tenancy.   Indeed, it is an esoteric term and it's not surprising it causes some confusion.  

You may be thinking of "scrupub", which, in contemporary use, refers to policies and legislation designed to benefit a small special interest group by "screwing the public."
No

"This was really brought home to me once when an officer wrote on the back of a ticket right in front of me that the perpetrator admitted her offense when she was sitting down saying nothing. "

Really?   Because I've never seen a ticket filled out in a courtroom before, nor have I ever seen a defense attorney show up at the side of the road on a traffic stop.

You say "...a policeman lied in every one of my cases..." in 20 years?  That is a lie in and of itself.  It seems I've caught you in two lies in a single paragraph.  Hmm....

Yes