instruction:
In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.
question:
Comment: Yes, suck it did.  It sucked.  Sucked eggs.  Sucked the hind teat.  Sucked like nothing's ever sucked before.

But, for a suck-up like you who's been sucked in since forever, just suck it up and hope you suck out.
answer:
Sexual-explicit


question:
Comment: If we go by the writer's logic, all cities should increase taxes on their rich, so high, that all the rich leave the city because as per the writer when rich will leave "Cheaper housing, fewer jerks. It’s a win/win". Listen to the writer, all cities throw out your rich. I hope the writer gets the sarcasm
answer:
Non-sexual-explicit


question:
Comment: Michael Albertson - The jet was really a nothing issue, but without any political capital left after appointing Lisa to the US Senate sear, his political opponents were able to kick him when was down.  It was an ugly scene, reminiscent of a public stoning, and I guess you are still throwing rocks.
answer:

Non-sexual-explicit