Given a document, an entity and its sentiment towards the entity, verify if it is the correct sentiment towards the entity. Answer should be yes or no. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

Ex Input:
Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Reidy is Neutral . Jim Reidy   an employment lawyer based in Manchester  N.H.  hears a fair amount about office holiday parties gone wrong. Last year  the high-profile CEO of a local company kicked things off by hanging mistletoe from the front of  his  pants belt   Reidy  says  "dancing around and making suggestions [saying ] 'It's the holidays  can't you see the mistletoe?' "
"[The CEO's] response was  'I was kidding; everybody knows I'm kidding ' " Reidy says  but evidently many employees did not see it that way.
"There were also a segment of people saying  'Do I say something ' " Reidy says. But there was also the fear for retaliation or being seen as the buzzkill without a sense of humor. "That's emblematic of why a lot of employers have gotten away from" holiday parties  he says.
This was a good year for many companies and they have cash to spend on parties. One CareerBuilder survey found 71 percent of employers are hosting holiday parties this year  up 10 percentage points from a decade ago. But  Reidy   who recently surveyed about 40 companies in  his  area  found that this year more than half opted to go non-alcoholic at their shindigs.
For those serving alcohol   Reidy  advises other measures  like limiting the length of the party  or holding the event during the day and inviting spouses and children. Overall  says  Reidy   workplace parties are far tamer than they were back in the 1980s and '90s.

Ex Output:
yes


Ex Input:
Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Papadopoulos is Negative . In an email   Papadopoulos  claimed that it was top members of Trumpâs campaign team that agreed to a pre-election meeting with representatives of Russian President Vladimir Putin.
According to a Bloomberg report  the email was disclosed in an FBI affidavit  supporting criminal charges against  Papadopoulos . It is not included in the court documents that detail his guilty plea and cooperation with Robert Muellerâs team.
The message  if true  would bolster claims that Trumpâs campaign attempted to collude with Russian interests. But itâs unclear whether  Papadopoulos   who pleaded guilty to lying to the Federal Bureau of Investigation  was merely boasting when  he  sent the July 14  2016  email to a Kremlin-linked contact. Thereâs also no indication such a meeting ever occurred.
Writing to the Russian contact a week before the Republican National Convention   Papadopoulos  proposed a meeting for August or September in the U.K. that would include âmy national chairman and maybe one other foreign policy adviserâ and members of Putinâs office and Russiaâs foreign ministry. âIt has been approved by our side â  Papadopoulos  wrote.
At the time of the email  Paul Manafort was the campaign chairman. It was reported earlier that Sam Clovis  Trumpâs current pick to lead the USDA  was  Papadopoulos â campaign supervisor  at that time  and that heâd been encouraging of his efforts to reach out to Russian officials.
 Papadopoulos  developed three separate contacts that  he  hoped would help dig up dirt on Hillary Clinton  and  he  kept people within the campaign in the loop.
The communications  by Skype  Facebook  text and email  show the electronic trail the government is following to verify how the campaign handled Russian contacts. One of those people  identified in court documents as Foreign Contact 2  is Ivan Timofeev  Russian foreign ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova said Tuesday. He works for the Moscow-based Russian International Affairs Council  a Kremlin-linked research group  and isnât a foreign ministry employee  despite  Papadopoulos âs assertion  she said.
Timofeev has so far refused to speak with anyone about the contacts he had with  Papadopoulos   except to say he felt  Papadopoulos  was an âenthusiast  with little experience.â

Ex Output:
no


Ex Input:
Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Daniel Holtzclaw is Neutral . Two weeks ago  I reported that former Oklahoma City Police Department senior forensic analyst Elaine Taylor is the mother-in-law of Detective Rocky Gregory  who co-led the investigation of former OCPD officer Daniel Holtzclaw. This information was not disclosed by police or prosecutors before  during  or after a biased investigation  botched forensic analysis and testimony  and chaotic trial that resulted in a 263-year sentence for Holtzclaw -- who has maintained his complete and actual innocence from the start and is appealing his convictions.
2) How was Taylor assigned to the Daniel Holtzclaw case  on which Det. Gregory served as co-lead sex-crimes unit investigator?
Smith failed to answer how Taylor was assigned to the case. He did  however  admit that the "administration of the OCPD was aware of the relationship between Elaine Taylor and Rocky Gregory." Yet  the administration did not disclose this relationship to  Holtzclaw 's defense team  which was then denied an opportunity to cross-examine Taylor and Gregory about that relationship to impeach the witnesses by uncovering potential bias and prejudice against  Holtzclaw .
Finally  Smith glibly asserted  "the forensic lab did not have a  Holtzclaw  case."
1) Forensic analyst Elaine Taylor's son-in-law  Det. Rocky Gregory  interrogated  Holtzclaw  with Det. Davis on June 18  2014  just 14 hours after  Holtzclaw  pulled over Jannie Ligons at an end-of-shift traffic stop.
2) Forensic analyst Elaine Taylor's son-in-law  Det. Rocky Gregory  mishandled and potentially contaminated the evidence bag used to store  Holtzclaw 's uniform pants -- the linchpin forensic evidence examined and tested by his mother-in-law.
As forensic expert Dr. Michael Spence noted in a sworn affidavit supporting  Holtzclaw 's motion for an evidentiary hearing:
"At the June 18  2014  interrogation of Officer Holtzclaw  investigators secured the uniform pants at about 6:00 p.m. At the beginning of this process  video footage showed Detective Gregory placing his bare hand into the evidence bag. The detective proceeded to push on the bottom of the bag -- in order to fully open it.  Officer Holtzclaw  could then be seen handling  his  utility belt   his  cell phone   his  pockets   his  wallet  and  his  keys -- (SET ITAL) all prior (END ITAL) to unclasping his belt  unzipping his fly  and removing his pants. In addition to the obvious DNA transfer issues associated with this order of events  both the belt and the pants collected from  Officer Holtzclaw  were placed in (SET ITAL) one bag (END ITAL). Consequently  these items were stored together  transported together  and remained together  until the moment that the lab analyst accessed the contents of the evidence bag."
3) Forensic analyst Elaine Taylor's son-in-law  Det. Rocky Gregory  was present during the search of  Holtzclaw 's car in the wake of Ligons' sexual assault allegation. All of the swabs taken from the car were submitted to the OCPD crime lab. In fact  when Elaine Taylor called Det. Davis to ask a question about the swabs  Det. Davis replied that she could not answer the questions because "I did not ask for those swabs to be taken."
4) Forensic analyst Elaine Taylor's son-in-law  Det. Gregory  was one of six participants in a meeting at the Springlake Division before  Holtzclaw  was taken to headquarters to be questioned about the Ligons stop.
6) After  Holtzclaw 's interrogation  forensic analyst Elaine Taylor's son-in-law  Det. Gregory  accompanied  Holtzclaw  to his home  where Det. Gregory failed to take key pieces of forensic evidence  including  Holtzclaw 's underwear (which Det. Gregory incorrectly assumed had been washed) and other uniforms.
7) Richard Smith's denial that the crime lab handled a "Holtzclaw case" is contradicted by the lab's own assignment of just two case numbers -- SD14-273 and SD14-399 -- for all the evidence tested. Both lab case numbers list the defendant as "Holtzclaw  Daniel." Lab case No. SD14-273 combined evidence from several accusers' allegations under that one case  beginning with Ligons' allegations and including DNA from nine other accusers (Terri Morris  Sherry Ellis  Florene Mathis  Carla Johnson  Rosetta Grate  Kala Lyles  Regina Copeland  Adaira Gardner and Syrita Bowen)  as well as DNA from  Holtzclaw  and his then-girlfriend Kerri Hunt.
8) Forensic analyst Elaine Taylor's son-in-law  Det. Gregory  was one of 12 OCPD officials who executed a search warrant at 633 Culbertson Drive on Sept. 3  2014  the residence where accuser Rosetta Grate alleged  Holtzclaw  assaulted her and where she alleged she had left DNA evidence on the back of a chair and on a towel she claimed she left in a bedroom closet. Taylor conducted testing on evidence collected at this scene where her son-in-law  who had earlier mishandled DNA evidence collection at  Holtzclaw 's interrogation  was present.
In other words  Det. Gregory and Det. Davis  supervised by Lt. Muzny  consolidated the forensic evidence in the Morris and Ligons cases under 14-049050 (the case number assigned to Ligons' incident) since they were both "related" to  Holtzclaw . As described previously  the police submitted DNA from Ligons and nine other accusers under Ligons' lab case No. SD14-273. Police incident number 14-49050 (Ligons' case) is present on many evidence documents signed by Elaine Taylor (such as chain of custody forms for accusers' buccal swabs). This means that Taylor was well aware that numerous alleged victims were involved in No. 14-049050 -- not just Jannie Ligons.
In sum  Det. Gregory was actively and intimately involved in the  Holtzclaw  investigation from day one  including participating in a strategic meeting with higher-ups before  Holtzclaw 's interrogation  conducting the interrogation with Det. Davis  overseeing the search of  Holtzclaw 's vehicle  and participating in the formulation of a photo lineup for accuser Ligons (which Det. Davis nixed). Det. Gregory personally collected and directly submitted DNA evidence in the Holtzclaw case to his mother-in-law and participated in a raid of a home where more DNA evidence in the Holtzclaw case was collected and submitted to his mother-in-law.
Taylor's collaboration with the prosecution to emphasize that the DNA on  Holtzclaw 's pants that she matched to accuser Adaira Gardner was most likely from vaginal fluid transfer "not only contradicted the scientific results " according to Dr. Spence  but also "defied the logic that wearers typically leave DNA on their frequently used garments." He further noted that the minuscule quantities of DNA mixtures found on  Holtzclaw 's pants "were quite consistent with the expected transfer of epithelial skin cells during incidental handling events."

Ex Output:

no