Given a document, an entity and its sentiment towards the entity, verify if it is the correct sentiment towards the entity. Answer should be yes or no. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

[EX Q]: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Luke Cage is Neutral . Netflix just published the new âDefendersâ series  the culmination of several years of work by Marvel Television to get Marvel into prestige serial storytelling. (We have to find a new word for this: we canât call it âTVâ much longer.) The Marvel-Netflix deal now includes two seasons of âDaredevil â and one each of âJessica Jones â âLuke Cage â and âIron Fist.â Thatâs 65 episodes  plus the new eight-episode âDefenders â around 50 minutes each. Thatâs more than 60 hours on screen in the last two years.
Now  you can blame whatâs wrong with âThe Defendersâ on the Marvel shtick: America has no enemies but its own divisions. The heroes inevitably fight each other. That could work if you had writers who understood Americaâs divisions  but itâs disastrous when all youâve got is pettiness and liberal identity politics. âThe Defendersâ does better than any Marvel movie to give you thrilling fights  however. At least Daredevil does;  Luke Cage  is also pretty good; the other two were deficient to begin with and apparently not getting better.
There is a deep argument hidden somewhere in this mess of a story. But to see it develop  the viewer has to ask himself: why is Daredevil so scared of his own heroism  which might lead him to kill people? Heâs a Catholic  of course. And weâre reminded of that in an important scene in a confessional. But whatâs the import of that fact? Why is  Luke Cage  telling a grieving mother  he  learned about the power of prayer from  his  own father?  He âs an heir to MLKâs sacrifice and hope  as we know from  his  own show  but why does that matter here? The evil guys  too: why is their quest for immortality so evil or wrong? We all want to live as long as possible  anyway!
Instead  we get this mess of American social pathologies of individualism and evil ninjas. This is worthless for articulating the fight between two worlds  one dedicated to equality  the other inequality. Maybe future stories will get better. A friend pointed out that thereâs a lot of Christianity in the first season of âLuke Cage â and the second season is supposed to be more serious about civil rights. He also pointed out another sign of hope: civil rights are connected with the Second Amendment.
In my previous essay  I said high-flying civil rights rhetoric collapses in âLuke Cage.â Behold: in an emotional moment mid-season  Luke Cage tells a young black man-turned-criminal about Crispus Attucksâthe first man killed in the Boston Massacre of 1770  and thus  the first martyr of the American Revolution. He was black. We see his legacy exploited by a gangster and a politician  who abuse Harlem while pretending to save it. Unlike Attucks  they always put themselves first  because when they were poor  weak  and needed protection  nobody put them first.
 Luke Cage  takes a shot to the head from that stupid  scared young criminalâbut it makes no dramatic sense  with a literally bulletproof hero.  Luke Cage  is no Crispus Attucks. Our stories fake sacrifice  and thus betray our deepest awareness of our neediness. Thatâs because of our politics and our fear of death.
[EX A]: yes

[EX Q]: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Armour is Neutral . Under Armour  has a new subscription service.
 Stitch Fix  has been successful  which bodes well for Under  Armour .
Under  Armour  has just announced a new subscription service called ArmourBox.
Here's how it works: Tell Under  Armour  what kind of clothes you like and how you work out  and they'll ship you a box with four to six items for you to consider purchasing. No purchase is required  there's no fee  and shipping is free both ways. If you like the whole box and buy it all  you'll get a 20% discount.
There are a few differences between the two services. Stitch Fix doesn't work on a subscription model unless you want it to  each box carries a $20 fee unless you buy something  and Stitch Fix carries more than just its house brands  unlike Under Armour.
With ArmourBox  on the other hand  you can choose to receive a shipment every 30  60  or 90 days  but you can't skip a delivery or pause your subscription.
Under Armour's service carries no fees  and there are no charges unless you forget to return a box or you decide to buy something. The customer is required to take action within seven days so that they're not charged for it all.
The no-risk strategy is an ambitious play to get product into customers' homes so that they can evaluate it on their own time. It's a sign of the confidence that Under  Armour  has in  its  offerings. It's hoping that if it can get its stuff in people's hands  they'll like it enough to continue receiving it.
If that doesn't happen  Under Armour has worse problems than a failed subscription service.
[EX A]: no

[EX Q]: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Donald J. Trump is Neutral . Getting ready to make a major speech to the National Assembly here in South Korea  then will be headed to China where I very much look forward to meeting with President Xi who is just off his great political victory. â Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) November 8  2017
Looking forward to a full day of meetings with President Xi and our delegations tomorrow. THANK YOU for the beautiful welcome China! @FLOTUS Melania and I will never forget it! pic.twitter.com/sQoUWIGAiQ â  Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) November 8  2017
On  the former  Trump  appears to have laid down  his  cards. The hard-line speech  he  delivered before the South Korean National Assembly on Wednesday poured scorn on Pyongyang. âNorth Korea is a country ruled as a cult â  he  said. âAt the center of this military cult is a deranged belief in the leaderâs destiny to rule as parent-protector over a conquered Korean Peninsula and an enslaved Korean people.â
Later in the speech   Trump  gave North Korea a sharp warning: âDo not underestimate us â  he  said. âAnd do not try us.â
It's not just a matter of sending tough messages to the North Koreans â who quickly dismissed  Trump 's remarks as the ravings of a âmad dog.â  Trump  and hawkish figures within  his  camp see China as both the problem and the solution to addressing North Korea and have long insisted that Beijing do more to squeeze its otherwise-isolated neighbor.
âTo those nations that choose to ignore this threat or worse still  to enable it  the weight of this crisis is on your conscience â  Trump  said in Seoul.
But no matter how hard  Trump  will try  it's emphatically clear that the Chinese don't see eye-to-eye with the Americans. Although they have no affection for North Korean despot Kim Jong Un  they fear both the chaos that the collapse of Kim's regime could create as well as the prospect of a unified  pro-American Korea on its doorstep. While they are increasing economic pressure on Pyongyang  they are unlikely to cut off the spigot to any extent that would provoke genuine instability. Instead  China advocates a diplomatic track that could lead to negotiations  although potentially with conditions to which neither the United States nor its regional allies may be inclined to agree.
âThere are big differences in the way of thinking between the United States and China on North Korea â Yang Xiyu  a former Chinese Foreign Ministry negotiator on North Korea  said to the New York Times. â Trump  thinks of North Korea too simplistically â that if China cuts off the oil  the nuclear issue will be solved.â
On trade  China will give  Trump  the useful headlines  he  seeks. The White House is expected to announce lucrative deals between U.S. and Chinese companies that could be worth as much as $250 billion  according to Bloomberg News. But it's not expected to win to any real Chinese concession on the larger structural concerns surrounding the trade imbalance between the countries.
âEven if Xi and  Trump  sign import and investment agreements  as anticipated  Trumpâs demands will do little to either reduce the trade deficit or restore American jobs (which have largely been lost to automation  not to China) " Mira Rapp-Hopper wrote in Foreign Affairs.
[EX A]:
no