We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Ex Input:
Morality cannot come from us, and therefore humanity cannot be unethical.

Ex Output:
Invalid


Ex Input:
For the very worst offenders who are uncontroleable, there are options such as solitary confinement, etc.

Ex Output:
Valid


Ex Input:
But you're assuming there can be no experience of God at the level of a direct impression, that it has to be a (necessarily compound) idea.

Ex Output:

Invalid