The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.

Q: Context: 'ok' 'then what will do ? if you ok for 3 food for me , 3 firefor you, 2 water for me , for this deal we can go forward?' 'of course not. you just took all the priority items and you still want two water. I am going to make the last offer. you take two food and two water, I take one food, three wood and aone water. '
Utterance: 'bro  make food as 3 and send me offer on that box'

A: No
****
Q: Context: 'well i do need alot of firewood since i need it to start a fire' 'Okay, so you can take all the firewood and I take all the food. I will also need at least two waters because I had a limited supply at home.🙂' 'no, i will need 2 water because i need to drink it and there not much water around me'
Utterance: 'Please work with me. I will need plenty water to make it to the top of the mountain.'

A: No
****
Q: Context: 'I need one more to light a fire to scare away animals. Please😮' 'Then How about I get two foods, 1 firewood and 1 water?' 'Like i said food is my top priority so i will not do well with less than 2.'
Utterance: 'Then you get two food and no firewood here.😮'

A:
No
****