In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Comment: Bullshit. It adds nothing to the subject.
Obscene

Comment: No, I'm calling YOU a liar and I made that crystal clear.
Non-obscene

Comment: The judge's ruling leaves me very unease, but so does how the feminist activists twisting of the facts.  As reported in the National Post: "“I think we should be concerned when a trial judge in a sexual assault case refers to a complainant as ‘a drunk’,” said Elaine Craig, an associate professor of law at Dalhousie University."  The judge did not call the complainant a drunk. He said "a drunk can consent", which is a general statement, not specifically directed at the complainant.  One would think someone  who is an associate profess of law would know the difference, but when leftist-feminist ideology is in play facts are ignored or twisted.

Non-obscene