We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Example Input: Sent1: Not to mention that the death penalty is more costly than simple life in prison in both money and time.
 Sent2: Back to reality, we convict the wrong person all the time, and we've set up a system where death penalty is actually more expensive than life in prison.
Example Output: Similar

Example Input: Sent1: We could get the person who may kill in the future.
 Sent2: There are no children being killed, and killing a child is murder in America.
Example Output: Not similar

Example Input: Sent1: There is no way to determine how many murders would have been committed.
 Sent2: When a person commits a crime, the Judicial system is responsible for determining a proportional response or penalty for the crime.
Example Output:
Not similar