Given a document, find the main entity about whom the author is writing. Write the full name if mentioned in the text. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].
--------
Question: Robert Dudley  who will replace Tony Hayward on Oct. 1  promised changes in light of the environmental disaster. "There's no question we are going to learn things from this investigation of the incident " he said.
 Hayward has some sympathy in his native Britain  where many pensions rely on BP stock and some consider U.S. outrage at the company to be over the top. A recurring theme in newspaper editorials and discussions among many Britons is that there simply wasn't much one man could do in the face of relentless American wrath.
 "BP sends Tony Hayward to Siberia to appease US " read a headline in the Guardian.
 Hayward  who will stay on BP's board until Nov. 30  will receive a year's salary of 1.045 million pounds (US$1.6 million) as part of his severance package. His pension benefits are valued at about 11 million pounds (US$16.8 million)  and he retains his rights to shares under a long-term performance program that could eventually be worth several million pounds if BP's share price recovers.
 Hayward said it was right that BP embark on its next phase under new leadership  and expressed his condolences for the families of the workers killed in the explosion.
 "The Gulf of Mexico explosion was a terrible tragedy for which -- as the man in charge of BP when it happened -- I will always feel a deep responsibility  regardless of where blame is ultimately found to lie " he said.
 President Barack Obama  who once said he would fire Hayward if he could  discussed the change in BP's leadership with Svanberg on Monday  Gibbs said Tuesday. No details about the conversation were released.
 Dudley spent some of his childhood in Mississippi and worked for 20 years at Amoco Corp.  which merged with BP in 1998. He lost out to Hayward on the CEO slot three years ago.
Hayward if he could  discussed the change in BP's leadership with Svanberg on Monday  Gibbs said Tuesday. No details about the conversation were released.
 "Our concern is not who heads BP " Gibbs said. "Mr. Hayward is leaving. The key is that BP can't leave and should not leave the Gulf. ... They have obligations and responsibilities as the responsible party in this instance that have to be met regardless of who the CEO is."

Answer: Tony Hayward


Question: Andrew Conley showed no remorse or emotion as he described choking to death Conner Conley as the two wrestled Sunday  a probable cause affidavit said. He told investigators the child's last words were "Andrew  stop."
 Conley said he dragged his brother's body to his car before driving to see his girlfriend  who told investigators the teen "seemed happy  more happy than she had seen him in a while " according to the affidavit. Conley said he dumped the body near a park in his town of Rising Sun  about 90 miles (145 kilometers) southeast of Indianapolis.
 Prosecutors filed preliminary charges of murder against Conley along with a supporting affidavit Thursday. He is being charged as an adult and will appear Friday in court  Negangard said.
 Conley's family did not return messages for comment Thursday. Negangard said Conley had an attorney but none was listed in the affidavit.
 The teen told investigators he had had fantasies about killing someone since he was in eighth grade  including cutting somebody's throat  and felt "just like" the serial killer Dexter on the Showtime television series of the same name.
 Negangard said he will consider seeking the maximum prison term of life without parole. Conley's age makes him ineligible for the death penalty.
 The teen had no juvenile record and his teachers considered him a good student  Negangard said.

Answer: Andrew Conley


Question: President Donald Trump's critics are arguing that GOP calls for the Justice Department to investigate  Hillary Clinton  and Democrats' ties to Russia are an effort to distract from the real Russia investigation  into potential Trump-Russia collusion.
Ever since Watergate  the mantra of all major corruption investigations has been to "follow the money." Well  Americans of all political stripes should be outraged by the fact that both Democrats and Republicans in Washington are up to their eyeballs in Kremlin cash. Russian money found its way into the pockets of not only Trump advisers like Paul Manafort and Rick Gates â who were recently indicted by special counsel Robert Mueller âbut also Democratic power lobbyist Tony Podesta   Bill Clinton  and the Clinton Foundation.
This should suggest to objective observers that Russia was using its money to influence both sides in order to advance the Kremlin's interests. And it means that any full and impartial investigation of Russia's efforts to influence our political process needs to follow the Russian money flowing into the coffers of  the Clintons    their  foundation and  their  top associates.
The New York Times reported in 2015 that "shortly after the Russians announced their intention to acquire a majority stake in Uranium One   [former President Bill] Clinton  received $500 000 for a Moscow speech from a Russian investment bank with links to the Kremlin that was promoting Uranium One stock." In total  $145 million went to  the Clinton Foundation  from interests linked to Uranium One  which was acquired by the Russian government nuclear agency Rosatum.
Think that was just a coincidence? As former federal prosecutor Andy McCarthy points out  the Uranium One deal is not a national security scandal  it is a corruption scandal involving " Clinton  family self-dealing." Ask yourself: How many half-a-million-dollar speeches has  Bill Clinton  given to Kremlin-linked banks since  Hillary Clinton  was defeated? How much Russian money is flowing into  the Clinton Foundation 's coffers today? If Donald Trump had given a $500 000 speech paid for by a Kremlin bank  and his private foundation had accepted $145 million from Vladimir Putin-linked oligarchs and their Western business partners  do you think that his critics would be insisting there was nothing to see here?
A look at  Hillary Clinton 's time as first lady  U.S. senator  secretary of state and a Democratic candidate for president.
We should all be deeply concerned by how much Russian cash was sloshing around Washington  and how much of it found its way into  the bank accounts of the Clintons  and those around  them . And we should all  Democrats and Republicans alike  want to get to the bottom of it.
As Americans  it goes against our sensibilities to encourage the Justice Department of one party to investigate the vanquished candidate of the other party. But does the fact that  Clinton  lost mean Americans don't deserve to know the full extent of Russia's efforts to influence our political process?
None of this absolves the Trump campaign or calls into question the intelligence community's conclusion that "Putin and the Russian Government aspired to help ... Trump's election chances." But it does underscore that the Russians were smart in what the intelligence community calls their efforts to "undermine public faith in the US democratic process." They played both sides  and in so doing preyed on the singular weakness of the Clintons and those around them â greed.
Any impartial investigation of Russia's efforts to meddle in our democratic process needs to include a full inquiry of the Russian money flowing into  Clinton  world. Such an inquiry is not a distraction. It is critical to restoring public faith in American democracy.
Trump's obsession with  Hillary Clinton  should scare everyone
A Bill Clinton 'reckoning' for Democrats? Don't hold your breath.

Answer:
Clinton