In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Q: Comment: Blasted Maoists! Free Tibet!

A: Obscene
****
Q: Comment: why would an international body need to step into our country's affairs to provide cover for the Librano plan? did the locals (meaning Canadians not come up with the right info for the Librano crew to sell their policy to the masses) or is it that the Keynesians at the IMF were the only ones qualified to provide this 'high level' of expert advice
'it approximates that .......' that was all I needed to read to know the report was bunk - why wasnt it done with census data to have a real picture rather than this line of shit - but that is all we seem to get from the​ Libranos and their supporters - shit

A: Obscene
****
Q: Comment: Damn right I took it personally; he insulted, pretty deeply, me and my family and my friends and my colleagues at work. Its hard to represent English Canada as an open-minded society when these articles keep popping up. Mark Steyn, Margaret Wente, Barbara Kay, Diane Francis -- the list goes on. All have written irrational, blatant anti-Québec screeds at one time or another. Remember Wente's columns during the Maple Spring? Strangely, my Québec colleagues just shrug their shoulders; it seems their used to English Canada PC outrage mixed with outright bigotry.

A:
Obscene
****