In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

[Q]: Comment: The sad sad part of this story not mentioned is that so many people believe Trump's complete lie that Obama and liberal polices are killing coal. It is such a downright complete lie, it is 100% market forces, clean cheap natural gas made available by fracking that is killing coal and no amount of lies by trump can change this. Every single CEO of any energy company will and do tell you this. Trump lies and the ignorant sad people in the rural suburban part of this country believe his lies.  I have never been so saddened by how ignorant a large majority of this Country has become.
[A]: Non-obscene


[Q]: Comment: Sue his ass amen! The PERMANENT fund dividend is based off a system that replenishes its self every year. If we don't have as good of a year then the PFD would be less. Based off a 5 year average. He wants to cut the money that we would be putting back into the economy to bail out the states fuck ups. How about the state pay for there own mistakes and stop with all the dump road projects like upgrading our high way to 6-8 lanes. We don't need that. Slow down take your time or drive a different rout. Or all the money there wasting on bridges to no where. Or there own salaries. Don't cut the PFD.
[A]: Obscene


[Q]: Comment: The coward's way out would've been to vote yes, and STILL NOT READ the dang thing all the way through like what wasn't done when they passed it in the FIRST place! Only 4 congressmen did so.
[A]:
Obscene