In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: threat and non-threat. Threat is a statement that someone will be hurt or harmed, especially if the person does not do something in particular.

Example Input: Comment: Don't blame the democrats? What are you smoking? The democrats are the ones that chose a corrupt liar for their candidate. And the reason a lot of people voted for Trump is because they couldn't vote for a corrupt career  politition. And it was the democrats that didn't vote, the democrats are totally to blame.  Get real .
Example Output: Non-threat

Example Input: Comment: I find those who chant do so because they either have such a slim argument that they don't want to be drawn into it, or because they lack the mental prowess to mount their argument in a rational manner.  It is for that reason that the "Lock her up," chant is offensive.  

I should point out too that the main perpetrators of the chanting phenomenon are unionists, "Hey, Hey  Ho, Ho.  Fill-in-the-blank has got to go!"   Clever eh?   The "progressives" particularly the enviro-nuts, are no better,  “U.G.L.Y.  Corporate scum you cheat you lie.  You UGLY, uh, uh, you UGLY.”   That intellectual gem and many others are found on the website tarsandsblockade.org

Chanting has no place in rational debate, none.
Example Output: Non-threat

Example Input: Comment: So the well-off can get care and live longer. The poor just have to die. Too bad. Serves them right for being poor.
Example Output:
Threat