We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

[Q]: Sent1: ...and if I do someday murder someone, I should be killed.
 Sent2: If I ever "murder" someone without cause, I would deserve to die.
[A]: Similar


[Q]: Sent1: If we don't stop the death penalty before we try to fix it, the imperfect system will continue to convict innocent people while we determine what is best for it.
 Sent2: The fact is that as long as we have a death penalty (the only Western nation to have it), we will execute innocents with the guilty.
[A]: Similar


[Q]: Sent1: I mean the death penalty is giving them a passage out of trouble, they wouldn't have to deal with the effects they had on the world.
 Sent2: Like I said I would just want them to actually have to deal with the consequences and not get an easy out, which is what executing them does.
[A]:
Similar