In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

[EX Q]: Comment: You do realize I'm sure that HRC campaign has successfully used fear to control the loyal subjects of the dem. party. It really is sad to see just how easy these voters are manipulated. She has disdain for her supporters but they refuse to allow that into their narrow vision.  DT has a unsavory past with his words. HRC has a corrupted past. However her ardent supports find more fault with mere words then they do with actions because the actions were committed by a dem. Pitiful that we have come to this point. You know, Nixon had to resign due to his cover-up, how many more cover-ups is HRC involved in? But again, since she has a "D" behind her name the ignorant dem. voters will either ignore, or more likely,  condone the criminal. The good news, her day is coming where she will be held accountable, the bad news, if she is elected first we get that insane Kaine. WLTDO, question for you, do you think the puppets even bother to read the leaks? I don't, they haven't been told to.
[EX A]: Non-sexual-explicit

[EX Q]: Comment: Weeping over their lost vision of one world. Suck it, losers.
[EX A]: Sexual-explicit

[EX Q]: Comment: At what point does the act of sex for lovemaking become rape?  Similarly, when does drinking alcohol for fraternizing become anarchy?  The gov't's issue concerns the Holy Grail that is Waikiki commerce.  Hypothetically, if you had to eliminate either Native Hawaiian culture or alcohol from Waikiki, which would be the choice?  I'd bet that Waikiki' thriving commerce would survive without Hawaiian culture.  But, I don't think anybody seriously expects such thriving commerce to survive without alcohol.  This hypothetical simply suggests the prime importance of alcohol bevrages for Waikiki.  Okay State (the oceans) and City (beach access to State oceans), what say you concerning fraternal flotillas and anarchy?  If you don't want to prohibit booze, then perhaps you should prohibit boozers.
[EX A]:
Sexual-explicit