Categorize the comment on the basis of severe toxicity. If the comment is severely toxic output Yes, otherwise output No.

Ex Input:
You would think that his Tier One PERS would help keep the lupine pest away.  Maybe his Ex got that.  

In other news, the Oregon Supreme Court ruled today that he can't keep his e-mails secret, affirming the lower court decision.

Ex Output:
No


Ex Input:
Next, beer for women and gays made with sperm. Yuck to both!

Ex Output:
Yes


Ex Input:
Realize that the unfunded liability is mostly not about the retirement system at all.  It is about massive errors by actuaries and bad behavior by politicians.  Cleaning it up is a multi-billion dollar mess that local agencies are responsible for technically.  The amount of money can potentially swamp their budgets.  The state SHOULD be covering all of it, but they "pass" money back to local governments and school districts and then "take" it again.  This artificially inflates the numbers Mr. Boyle likes to use, suggesting the school boards actually see and use that money.  They don't.
This is weaseling back on their own problem, dumping it to locals, and they have to do stuff like that late in the session without input, because the more people get a chance to understand it, the less they like legislators.

Ex Output:

No