We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

Q: Rather it is more beneficial to engage others in a discussion in their own threads to discuss matters on what would be regarded as "their home turf."

A: Invalid
****
Q: Are you going to suggest that the lawmakers shouldn't be trusted to be armed for their own defense?

A: Valid
****
Q: Note that those advocating allowing atomic bombs to be owned by citizens would be the ones correct by the Constitution.

A:
Valid
****