Given a document, an entity and its sentiment towards the entity, verify if it is the correct sentiment towards the entity. Answer should be yes or no. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

[Q]: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Abdel Fattah al-Sisi is Neutral . President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi  has once again threatened to crush the militants.
âThe armed forces and the police will avenge our martyrs and restore security and stability with the utmost force in the coming period â  he  said after Fridayâs carnage.
 Sisi  has called for a comprehensive campaign to counter what  he  describes as the existential threat of radical jihadism  deploying moderate clerics to promote moderate Islam  for instance.
 He  is expected to run for a second term early next year. Even with a convincing win   he  will face pressure to deliver on promises of stability  especially if attacks like that on  Al Rawdah  persist.
In a December 2016 issue of al-Nabaa  one of the groupâs religious leaders left little doubt that Sufis would be targeted. It mentioned  Al Rawdah  directly.
[A]: yes


[Q]: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Trumper is Negative . Thatâs not too far of a fling  actually. One really bad move could do it  but  Trump  has insulated  himself  with people far more competent and worthy of  their  positions. To date   they âre keeping  him  from stepping over the edge.
I never thought he could do the job. Heâs made some solid moves in his first year in office  but I actually give the credit to those around him. As I said from the beginning  it was the Cabinet that would do the actual work  and much like his business dealings   Trump  would be the Ronald McDonald of politics.  He âs the face of the presidency  but the actual work is being done by somebody else.
Wolff leans to some old rumors in the book about Trumpâs campaign plans. Namely   he  never intended to be president.  He  was going to clean up by being the almost president  build up a ready-made audience  and launch a new TV network venture  TrumpTV.
Because nobody thought  he  would win  nobody prepared for the job. In fact  while  Trump  bragged openly to  his  glassy-eyed followers that  he âd finance  his  own campaign and be beholden to none (How many times did I hear a Trumper say  â He  canât be bought!â)   he  put very little of  his  own money into the campaign.  He  took donations  like every other candidate  but to this day  not a single  Trump  supporter can be convinced of that.
 He  didnât run  his  campaign like somebody that wanted to win. It was a show to  him .  He  was worthless in debates  because  he  obviously didnât understand the questions being asked of  him   but  his  base would flood online polls and declare  him  the winner  even before the debates were over (which tells me they didnât understand the questions  either  nor did they care).
 Trump  struck out at Wolff on Friday night (on Twitter  of course)  slamming  him  as a âloserâ and calling  his  book âboring and untruthful.â
Ok. Wolff  however  is thanking  Trump  for helping  him  sell books  which  in turn  is opening eyes.
[A]: no


[Q]: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Emily Worrall is Positive . Ogard and the co-founder of Barbie Savior  Emily Worrall  hope that the guide will make young volunteers and travelers more aware of what they're posting. Advice in the ten-point checklist includes: Be respectful of different cultures and traditions  avoid sweeping generalizations  challenge perceptions.
 Worrall  recalls  her  own experience a decade ago. When  she  was 17   she  went on a volunteer trip to Uganda.  She  shared photos of  herself  and the orphans  she  was helping with  her  family and friends. They showered  her  with praise. "They told me  'Wow  you're doing such amazing work.' They put me on a pedestal "  she  says. At the time   she  didn't consider the children's privacy or vulnerability. Years later  it became inspiration for this Barbie Savior post:
Ogard and  Worrall  don't want the guidelines to discourage volunteers from posting photos on social media. They just want photo-takers to reflect on what they're sharing. Ask for a subject's consent  they say. Show your social followers something different.
If you need inspiration   Worrall  says  check out some of the positive imagery from charities that received a Golden Radiator award in Radi-Aid's annual contest for the best and worst charity ads. These ads  like those from an NGO called Mama Hope  show local people actively engaged in helping others in their community.
If you're staying with a family in a low-income environment and they allow you to take a photo with their children  use it as a "great opportunity to challenge stereotypes "  Worrall  says. That might mean providing details and context — names  locations  personal stories — in an extended caption on social media.
And if a child gets excited when they see you pull out your tablet or smartphone and ask to take a photo with you  that doesn't mean it's OK to do so. "It's a cop out to say  well  they want it "  Worrall  says. "A child can't make that kind of decision."
[A]:
yes