In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

Example Input: Sentence: The cat was lying by the mouse hole waiting for the mouse, but it was too impatient.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the cat because the mouse is a cat in the original "It's a Wonderful Life" film. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Example Output: Wrong

Example Input: Sentence: Jackson was greatly influenced by Arnold, though he lived two centuries earlier.
 Reason: The 'he' refers to arnold because his father was named Arnold, who was the founder of the first school of the order of Cler. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Example Output: Wrong

Example Input: Sentence: There is a pillar between me and the stage, and I can't see it .
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the stage because I can't see around it  There is a pillar between me and the stage,. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Example Output:
Wrong