In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: threat and non-threat. Threat is a statement that someone will be hurt or harmed, especially if the person does not do something in particular.

Input: Consider Input: Comment: The cowboy racist culture in full flower since the theft and slaughter of all Native Americans since the Europeans whites hit the shore.  All of the military forces operating to protect and sustain another billionaire shipping oil unneeded in this nation to foreign shores to keep the circles of profit in place.  A Texas billionaire monopolist acquiring monopoly control over the nation's pipelines through the loans from the same investment banks bailed out in recent years.  In other words, they are all operating with government money, so they must be allowed to bulldoze their way through every farm, ranch, river, reservation, town, county, state, that gets in the way.  All done with a wave of the fey hand by any regulatory agency composed of embedded agents appointed by Corporate-campaign donor agents.  Ridiculous only to the white supremacist cowboy culturists.

Output: Non-threat


Input: Consider Input: Comment: Yes, the IM law requires the Department to establish moose population objectives and the BOG approves.  In most cases, unrealistically high population objectives have been set that are unsustainable.  This is what one can expect from a BOG that is entirely hunters and hunting guides and a Department that is addicted to hunting license revenues.  The result is predictable: endless killing of bears and wolves while moose objectives are seldom reached.  And this is at a cost of over $ 1 million per year, and at a greater cost to keeping Alaska's wild ecosystems healthy.  We are allowing ourselves to be bamboozled by an inherently corrupt system that favors about 14% of the Alaskans that hunt, and its not even working for them.  Its time to "repeal, and replace" the IM law with a wildlife conservation policy that is scientifically based, preserves ecosystem health, and respects democratic principles.

Output: Non-threat


Input: Consider Input: Comment: So ridiculous. Dense development around the stations makes transit more efficient and useful. We need tall condos and apartments right next to all of our light rail stations. The whole region paid for this station, and it's unfortunate that a few thousand can shoot down something that's best for the entire region. The Front Range will grow; you can't stop it. But dense development around transit at least makes the whole thing work a little better.


Output: Non-threat