Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.

Example Input: What an upside down world we live in, leave it to the lawyers to cost and ruin another facet of society; to step back and ponder that this "issue" is even worthy of discussion is an epiphany.
Example Output: No

Example Input: Those Sheep are contaminated.
You NEED to be concerned about the odor/smell being emitted from sewage. Odor means that the material has destabilized and is still putrefying, emitting endotoxins and other harmful bio-aerosols and pathogens
Processed Sewage Sludge (Biosolids) contains a vast array of toxic and persistent chemicals most of which are neither monitored nor regulated.

Sewage sludge of any class is such a complex and unpredictable mixture of pathogens and chemical compounds that even if all the constituents were known, it would still be impossible to reliably assess the health risks if and when this toxic waste is land applied.

Read the EPA Office of Inspector General's Report No. 14-P-0363.

By the way for the ignorant tree farmer, the municipality has made you a sucker.
Example Output: Yes

Example Input: This offering to Alaskans could sunset after 2 (two) years which should give ample time for distribution.   The State could continue selling 1 million acres per year for (4) four years thereafter to others elsewhere who want to invest or make Alaska their home.   Alaska would realize at average $2,500.00 per acre sale, amounting to 2.5 Billion in the first/second years; qualifying the use of the other half of the Permanent Fund earnings by Alaskans with the pass through.   Revenue over the next 4(four) years could, at minimum, generate a total of 12.5 BILLION or more for use to cover a portion of the States Operational Budget.
Example Output:
No