We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

[Q]: Sent1: Serial killers, "How many people did you kill?"
 Sent2: The fact that you believe a person should be executed for kicking a dog demonstrates that you are one f those unhinged vigliante sorts; your sort should be chlorinated from the gene pool before you become a serial killer.
[A]: Not similar


[Q]: Sent1: so you weigh whatever monetary savings (if any) over the life of someone found innocent after conviction (even if rare)?
 Sent2: After all, the person you're torturing may actually be innocent.
[A]: Not similar


[Q]: Sent1: Even if you think about it a second before you do it, you thought about it, and, then, it classifies it as murder.
 Sent2: If you think there shouldn't be a death penalty, you're an idiot.
[A]:
Not similar