We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Input: Consider Input: Sent1: The logic of less guns in law abiding citizens hands means less gun crime is clearly insane.
 Sent2: This should be a clear indicator that legal ownership of guns in no way has increased potential criminality for law abiding citizens.

Output: Not similar


Input: Consider Input: Sent1: We border two countries one of which is quite corrupt, what makes you think that criminals can't get guns.
 Sent2: One of the reason we are the country we are is because of our right to own guns.

Output: Not similar


Input: Consider Input: Sent1: So if you want to ban guns, 1,531,764 people will get killed or injured, and you'll only take guns out of the hands of those who don't even commit gun crimes.
 Sent2: The fact that you've committed murder is irrelevant and the only thing that matters is if a person has a gun?


Output: Not similar