We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Q: Sent1: The death penalty is not used for what it is supposed to be used for.
 Sent2: I think the death penalty should only be used in extreme cases where the accused is, without a doubt, guilty.

A: Not similar
****
Q: Sent1: Almost every study I've seen on the deterrent effect of the death penalty has suggested that it's no more effective than life imprisonment.
 Sent2: I am pro-death penalty even though I conceed that every study I have seen suggests it does absolutely nothing to deter capitol crimes.

A: Similar
****
Q: Sent1: So far, I am hearing "an eye for an eye" which is just that vengeance centered sense of justice that I am arguing against.
 Sent2: I do believe in the death Penalty, eye for and eye.

A:
Similar
****