In this task, you're given reviews from Amazon's food products and a summary of that review. Your task is to classify whether the given summary matches the original review. Generate "True" if the given review and its summary match, otherwise generate "False".

Reviews: I bought this product 10 months ago and last night the gasket on the water tank failed and I woke up to a kitchen covered in water. It seems that the Capresso coffee makers (which I have bought for years) have become less reliable. 
 Summary: The gasket on the water tank failed and I woke up to water all over my kitchen floor.
True

Reviews: Broke the second time I used it. Snapped about 4 eyelets down from the tip and I was only snagged on some seaweed. 
 Summary: Broke the second time I used it. Snapped about ...
True

Reviews: The two fasteners that secure the buckle on this belt are glued together. The back side has a flathead screwdriver slot, but the front end is just a smooth surface (ostensibly to eliminate any friction when buckling). However, since there is no way to grip the smooth front side, it’s impossible to break the glue lock and unscrew the pieces without damaging the belt. The comments tell you to grip the smooth front end with needle-nose pliers and then warns you to be careful not to damage the belt. But since that part is flush with the belt surface, the only way to grip it with needle-nose pliers is to dig into the leather to get the pliers around it. Some damage is almost assured if you do this. Poor design on an otherwise high quality belt. They could easily make the smooth front end with a flathead screwdriver slot just deep enough to get purchase to crack the glue. Then you'd just need two screwdrivers and no damage would occur. Seems like they put little thought into what the typical consumer's experience would be. 
 Summary: Not the greatest quality. Scents aren't great either

False