We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

[Q]: Sent1: We could get the person who may kill in the future.
 Sent2: We must look into why the person raped a child or murdered a father.
[A]: Not similar


[Q]: Sent1: You are probably going to murder somebody; hopefully it will b in a place with the death penalty and then you will get what you deserve.
 Sent2: I highly doubt the backing of why you personally would want the death penalty invoked is because you're worried at home that a mass murderer is going to escape and kill you or someone you love... seriously?
[A]: Not similar


[Q]: Sent1: However, as I know many disagree, I think there should be understandings for justifiable murders.
 Sent2: Like I said, I don't disagree with the theory of the death penalty.
[A]:
Not similar