We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

[EX Q]: It's also silly to argue that the Second Amendment only protects arms in common use.
[EX A]: Valid

[EX Q]: But if you can legally buy a gun for that purpose, it means that your attacker is that much more likely to be armed as well.
[EX A]: Valid

[EX Q]: Look at any country that has significantly tighter gun control laws than America, go far enough back and you'll eventually see that gun control was very simple at first.
[EX A]:
Valid