Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.

Q: Agreed, you left out the part about how we are entering a recession but our legislature continues to bury its collective head in the sand.  They continue to believe oil prices will rebound and save the state, and why shouldn't they, I mean it's happened many times in the past right?  Yes indeed it has, but that was when we were pumping millions of barrels of oil a day and only needed $50 or $60 a barrel to balance the budget, not the $100+ a barrel were hoping for now.

They refuse to believe it because they know that implementing a more balanced state revenue stream would require some form of taxes.  Taxes would likely spell the end of many political careers, so we are left with a bunch of ostriches in Juneau with their heads in the sand.......

A: Yes
****
Q: hey, y'all still there?  i'm not liking the limited character feature.  I know some posts get overly long  - surely some of mine do - but let people just pass on it if they choose.  to want to add  truly 3 or 4  more words, or even letters, to a post and be stopped, stinks.   and still not liking the peer review stuff - I think it is most likely a click click reaction from most users by now.

A: No
****
Q: "Leave your entitled attitude behind when you leave anchorage. Drivers out here are not accustomed to this and are not expecting it."

"We are constantly ran off sidewalks by riders speeding by. The entitled attitudes are not endearing."

Seems that everyone believes that bicyclists are behaving "entitled".  I side with the sidewalk pedestrians.  Bikes are vehicles that belong on the roads.  The car drivers should leave their entitled attitudes at home.  Better yet, they should get their fat butts on a bicycle since most of them need the exercise.

A:
Yes
****