In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

[EX Q]: Comment: Hi, ignoramus, love to see you in an alley way and
beat you with a louieville slugger. This will come 
to pas and whites will lose. Why, because they still
haven't even figured out which are men and which
are women. Terrible a race that can't even figure out
that born with a penis is male and a vagina is female.
Thank the Great one whites won't survive 50 more
years.
[EX A]: Sexual-explicit

[EX Q]: Comment: You do realize I'm sure that HRC campaign has successfully used fear to control the loyal subjects of the dem. party. It really is sad to see just how easy these voters are manipulated. She has disdain for her supporters but they refuse to allow that into their narrow vision.  DT has a unsavory past with his words. HRC has a corrupted past. However her ardent supports find more fault with mere words then they do with actions because the actions were committed by a dem. Pitiful that we have come to this point. You know, Nixon had to resign due to his cover-up, how many more cover-ups is HRC involved in? But again, since she has a "D" behind her name the ignorant dem. voters will either ignore, or more likely,  condone the criminal. The good news, her day is coming where she will be held accountable, the bad news, if she is elected first we get that insane Kaine. WLTDO, question for you, do you think the puppets even bother to read the leaks? I don't, they haven't been told to.
[EX A]: Non-sexual-explicit

[EX Q]: Comment: Wait a minute. If a woman cannot be responsible because she is drunk, can a drunken male also be absolved for having sex with her?
[EX A]:
Sexual-explicit