Categorize the comment on the basis of obscenity. If the comment is obscene output Yes, otherwise output No.
--------
Question: _"[Conte]  didn’t say whether he was referring to the fact that she’s the first woman nominated by a major political party, or that she’s the first nominee who’s being actively investigated by the FBI ..."_

I assumed most folks had the intelligence to understand. Guess McCall is an exception.

-- Paul

Answer: No


Question: yes, it is pathetic to jump on, post a "Trumper-like" comment without any information, facts or even a justification.

Answer: Yes


Question: Cydney asks : "What do you suggest?" - That's a tough one. I've spent years doing professional technical work via "leaderless" email lists. In those cases, there is a shared purpose. Still, "flame wars" do break out. In most cases, other individuals on the list will eventually step in and ask for a cessation of hostilities. Most of these email lists have an "owner" who can ban troublesome individuals.

Hal says : "It truly is a shame that this cannot be used for an adult discussion of important community and state issues." That statement is spot on. So much wasted time and opportunity where real issues could be solved or at least addressed! This kind of virtual turd-throwing (like simians in a zoo) is a great part of what is wrong with our republic.

Answer:
No