In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: insult and non-insult. Insult is any lanugage or act that is disrespectful or scornfully abusive.

Ex Input:
Comment: I think women are really dumb if they vote for hillary just because she's a woman.  Ladies, remember one thing, this has nothing to do with improving your lives, it has everything to do with her improving hers and her going down in history, its all about her ego also.  Anyone voting in this election is a fool because both are not worthy at all of holding office and i truly believe anyone who has had as many first lady posts as hillary has no right to run for president. She's never known what its like to be poor.  She's lived a fantasy and indulgent life more than any other woman out there.

Ex Output:
Insult


Ex Input:
Comment: Good point, any theocratic philosophy is a threat to constitutional democracy. Canada had a  blasphemy law. 

Violent theocrats are much worse - regardless of their religion. 

I only meant to say that The Premier was probably referring to violent Muslim theocrats which is essentially what an Islamist is. But the term is too close to Islamic and ends up stereotyping the religion. 

Given that the Ottoman empire ended just 100 years ago,  the link to religious rule is more recent in Islam. About the same time the Federal Reserve was created in America and they are still fighting about that!

Ex Output:
Non-insult


Ex Input:
Comment: The US forces didn't show a shred of mercy towards Khadr. The report of the incident indicates that they were about to shoot the severely wounded Khadr where he lay. Which, of course, is a war crime. At the last second an order came through from headquarters to patch Khadr up so that he could be interrogated for intel. And that's exactly what happened.

Ex Output:

Non-insult