In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Comment: News Flash, we cannot fix the worlds refugee problems. Besides, we have our own issues to deal with. A large number of First Nations Canadians, need our help. Charity begins at home. Once we have everyone in this country looked after, perhaps we can then look to helping with more of the world problems. It is time for the politicians in this country to stop all the BS and get to work fixing our First Nations issues. No more selfies and funding for UN projects, until we solve our own challenges. Man but the politicians in this country are crap.
Obscene

Comment: That's a nice story, except that it's not true.  I was very surprised when I heard Kershaw wasn't starting.  Like I said, Darvish looked like crap in game 3, and his eyes looked lost.  No way I would have started him in a game 7 with Kershaw available.  And again, the metrics on Darvish vs. the Astros are pretty astounding.  Frankly, I wouldn't even have put Darvish on the roster for the WS, given his history with the Astros.
Obscene

Comment: Damn, you beat to that SJW industialist....

Obscene