The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the self-need strategy, otherwise output No. self-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to create a personal need for an item in the negotiation, such as by pointing out that the participant sweats a lot to show preference towards water packages.
--------
Question: Context: 'Yikes, that's not good. Water is very important, especially if you now have to take care of two people at your campsite now. I do have 3 packages of water but I don't think I can spare it all.' 'I tell you what if we trade 3 food for 3 waters! I think that would be fair snice you said you need some food and snice I need some water. 🙂' 'Well, I do have some food but if I trade you all 3 packages of water, I won't have any at all. How about 2 packages of water, so we each have 1 package, including your sister?'
Utterance: 'How about this it think it will work out better for us and you snice you need fire wood too. You get 3 food and 2 firewood and and I get 3 water and 1 firewood. 🙂🙂'

Answer: No


Question: Context: 'okay how about if i only get 2 food packages and i give you 2 firewood. So we both gets something to help us/ Because i to at least 1 firewood' 'That would work for me if I get all 3 water still' 'How about you get 2 of the waters an i would take 1 of them? I need some water to stay hydrated '
Utterance: 'If you get two foods then I need more items overall'

Answer: No


Question: Context: 'Would I be able to take 2 firewood and 3 waters and then you take the res?' 'Yes' 'It sounds like we are going to have a really good weekend!  I'm pumped up!  We'll have enough firewood to keep warm, lots of water, and food as well!'
Utterance: 'Excellent'

Answer:
No