In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

[EX Q]: Comment: Here's another one worth searching for: G&M Feb 09, 2017
Gerry Sklavounos returning to Quebec Legislature, says he’ll be ‘more careful’

In light of the G&M "unfounded",  The timing of this story is even more poignant--but, I speak as a male.  I am sure that many women wouldn't find it poignant at all...but frustrating, infuriating, insulting...
[EX A]: Non-obscene

[EX Q]: Comment: If the author  had any appreciation of multiculturalism, he would understand that people of different languages and culture have difficulties with names with different spelling constructs and pronunciations. The author thinks multiculturalism is for him to receive as a birthright for not having been born white, and  that it is beneath his own dignity to extend multiculturalism tolerance to others of different races and cultural backgrounds.  He makes a poor example of what a Canadian ought to be.
[EX A]: Non-obscene

[EX Q]: Comment: You want a principle for ordaining women? Having the institutional Church rid itself of its ingrained sexism -- the sexism that is the ONLY actual reason for not ordaining women.
[EX A]:
Non-obscene