We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Q: If money were truly a determining factor, we could save a lot (execution = $1.2 million, life without parole = $750,0000) by joining all the rest of the western industrialized nations in eliminating the death penalty.

A: Valid
****
Q: >_> Says the person who brought up freaking Nelson in a debate about the death penalty for murders.

A: Valid
****
Q: People holding guns rarely kill by accident, but even when they didn't intend to kill but just do bad things to someone they don't like much, then they're in trouble for murder if the guy eventually dies.

A:
Invalid
****