We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

[EX Q]: Sent1: The death penalty has never been shown to be a deterent to murder.
 Sent2: If the death penalty were an adequate deterrent then we would not have murder.
[EX A]: Similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: If we can not prevent the innocent from unjust punishment, we should not have the death penalty.
 Sent2: The fact is that as long as we have a death penalty (the only Western nation to have it), we will execute innocents with the guilty.
[EX A]: Similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: The death penalty is the best possible deterrent for crime.
 Sent2: The death penalty doesn't need to serve as a deterrent to crime.
[EX A]:
Similar