Categorize the comment on the basis of severe toxicity. If the comment is severely toxic output Yes, otherwise output No.

Q: Thanks for contributing this enlightening hindsight.

A: No
****
Q: Really? 10s of 1000s of cars daily during the summer, with dozens of idiots passing like it's NASCAR and no cops? Someone dies weekly on that highway. 

Guess it's time to shoot out tires of crazy drivers.

A: Yes
****
Q: I doubt if it would be possible for someone not born in the Dark Ages to understand less about science than you do. The odds of there being a “gay gene” are practically zero, likely there is no single factor that determines whether a person will be hetero or homosexual. Your silly assertion that people who don’t believe homosexuality is a choice must believe in some here-to-for undiscovered “gay gene” is a classic straw man. As far as your god hypothesis goes there is as much evidence to support your belief in a supernatural being as there is santa clause the tooth fairy and the flying spaghetti monster. Im absolutely fed up with you wanna be iron age goat herders misrepresenting the scientific method. We tried it you way and we got the Dark Ages as a result. No thanks you can keep your silly book of fairy tales.

A:
Yes
****