Given a document and an entity the task is to select the author's sentiment towards the entity. Sentiments can be Positive, Neutral and Negative. Select Positive if the article expresses a positive view towards the given entity or praises its quality or skills. Select Neutral if the document expresses no clear view towards the entity or has equal amounts of positive and negative statements or expressing some fact/quote by someone else. Select Negative if the article expresses a negative view towards like harsh remarks, criticizing entities action/decision etc. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

What is the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Dmitry Medvedev ? Russian President Dmitry Medvedev after his meetings with Hu also underscored the importance of coordinated regional measures to combat the global crisis.
 "Of course  today our attention is centred on those measures necessary to prevent or minimise the negative influences of the global financial crisis  which of course have an effect on our bilateral ties " Medvedev said.
 "The main goal is not only to preserve the relations existing between our states  but to give them a new impulse " he added.
 Medvedev hailed Hu's visit as "friendly and constructive " adding these were qualities "that characterise relations between our two countries."
 The Chinese president ended his talks with the Russian for "Thank You".
 Medvedev and Putin did not mention these figures  instead citing bilateral trade with China worth over 55 billion dollars in 2008.
 China and Russia also agreed to boost the use of their domestic currencies in trade  Medvedev added  as Moscow seeks to lessen the global dominance of the US dollar.
 "Another very important task -- which today has become very timely -- is the question of using national currencies in mutual payments " he said. "We agreed to take additional measures in this direction."
Positive

What is the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Rachel Botsman ? In her witty new book Australian technology author and TED celebrity Rachel Botsman tells us why it did not work. Who Can You Trust? How Technology Brought Us Together and Why It Could Drive Us Apart might be a bit too perky for some but it reveals some deep truths.
With industrial power collapsed  social media’s “distributed trust” began its run to win popular trust.  Botsman  even claims to have predicted the next stage of evolution  anticipating Airbnb  Zipcar and Uber in  her  previous book. At first the masses took to social technology like ducks to water but few thought through the costs of power flowing from institutional experts to less sophisticated individuals. It turned out that these social media had institutions too  if less hierarchical  but still leading to someone at the top with a great degree of control over the people’s “open” media below them.
 Botsman  says  she  would not have written  her  book if  she  did not think distributed networks could solve many problems and develop popular trust  but the many examples presented in  her  book demonstrate that “distributed trust always seem to lead us back to centralized power ” with Facebook  Amazon  and Alibaba leading the list.
 Her  thesis is that distributed systems need to know who is telling the truth in order to be social but their media technology develop so fast and anonymously it becomes difficult to trace accountability. Perhaps 75 percent of automobiles will self-drive by 2040. How can sufficient trust develop in such a major activity in such a short time? Blockchains like Bitcoin may replace governmental currency and financial transactions. Robots threaten to take everyone’s job. The most famous bot was HAL 9000 in 2001: A Space Odyssey and we all know what happened then. Some “trust pause” will certainly be necessary for such major social transitions.
Take the number one social media technology guy  Mark Zuckerberg  who created Facebook to be an open forum for public discussion. Yet  after social media was accused of biasing the presidential election even  he  had to reluctantly concede (the second time) that there was an abundance of fake news on  his  site  which  he  then promised to fix in a socially positive way.  His  solution was to balance alternative views by adding “additional perspectives ” including noting after doubtful material that fact checkers disputed the claims in the original published news. But who would do the “fact checking”?
 Botsman  does not mention  it  but Google’s top scientist Ray Kurzweil had bigger ideas. Computers would be thinking for themselves by 2014 with humans becoming immortal soon after. Humans would become immortal under Kurzweil’s Calico project to replicate nature’s control of mitochondrial DNA by moving toxic bacteria into the cell nucleus to stop aging. With age under control people would live forever. At the same time  artificial intelligence would develop computers that learn by themselves. Ageless individuals could then link an AI machine to their brain so they could give accurate and immediate responses to every kind of question. But if this takes place instantly  is that a person still a person or a computer?
China’s Social Credit System would produce a “social credit score” for every Chinese citizen and introduce national networks of shame to ameliorate and control unruly segments of the population. This system should have a bullish future in much of the world now under authoritarian governments.  Botsman  quips: “Today China  tomorrow a place near you.”
Not a place in the U.S. with its democratic government protecting privacy  right? One big obstacle to such protection mentioned by  Botsman  is that government regulation simply cannot keep up with the explosive rate of change in private social media technology. There is that free speech and press stuff but Congress just approved another renewal of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act seventeen years after 9/11 and few doubt that some similar future horrendous terrorist act would make the government’s surveillance even more intrusive.
 Botsman ’s general solution to increase social trust is to rely upon reputation  which is sound  but extremely difficult to evaluate as  her  book proves.
How do we even know if  Botsman  isn’t a bot already  predicting China for us all?
Positive

What is the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Eva Schloss ? Eva Schloss   stepsister of Anne Frank and a Holocaust survivor herself  sits for an interview at George Mason University on Feb. 7 in Fairfax  Va.  Schloss  has been the subject of a play and now a âvirtual realityâ hologram program meant to keep up awareness of genocide survivors years after they die. (Jahi Chikwendiu/The Washington Post)
A âdirty Jewâ refugee on the run for two years  a survivor of the Auschwitz concentration camp  and stepsister to Holocaust victim Anne Frank   Eva Schloss  had dramatic  amazing  horrifying stories to tell.  She  kept them locked inside  herself  for decades  but now the 88-year-old British grandmother is on a tear  diving into everything from cutting-edge hologram technology to controversies about Justin Bieber to keep people thinking about the lessons of the Holocaust.
 The well-coiffed  plain-spoken Schloss  has  her  own nightmarish tales from World War II Europe and the camps. And of overcoming postwar suicidal depression. And of  her  famous stepsister. But in  her  books  work with prisoners and public speaking around the world   she  talks just as much about what  she  sees as todayâs horrors: Syrian refugees on the run  ISIS torture of Christians  the immorality of drone and atomic warfare  environmental degradation  a slipping interest in public education. And what  she  calls the enduring need to pay attention.
âI talk about it and tell people  this is what Germany was. Not everybody was â by no means â anti-Semitic or supported Hitler. They had good Jewish friends  but they took the easy way out and looked the other way. It is the danger of the bystander â  Schloss  said in an interview Wednesday before an evening appearance at the Center for the Arts at George Mason University in Fairfax  Va. âThis is what we have to teach young people â not to be indifferent  but take part; if you see injustice being done  speak out.â
 Schloss  is on a U.S. speaking tour  with the first stop at George Mason  where she appeared for more than an hour.  Schloss  spoke in a matter-of-fact tone as she was interviewed by Eli Rosenbaum  a federal prosecutor who has investigated Nazi cases. The crowd of 1 200 filled two levels  and remained rapt and silent â except for a few standing ovations.
 Schloss  is among those outspoken on a controversial  complex topic: What are the best  most appropriate ways to keep the moral lessons of genocide alive? While for many the story of Frank  who died at 15 in a German concentration camp  is still a simple  tragic tale of a talented  precocious writer; the portrait of her life is increasingly becoming more nuanced and real over the decades as additional details come out.
 Schloss  has long spoken bluntly about Frank  a girl she met in an Amsterdam courtyard when both of their families were on the run. They never lived as sisters  and Schlossâs mother married Frankâs father after the war. During the war  many of their family members â and spouses â had been murdered. On Wednesday  in a Post interview and on stage   Schloss  said Frank was a âleader  outgoingâ â her nickname   Schloss  said  was âquack quackâ because she talked so much â but also sometimes ânaughtyâ and âbossy.â  Schloss  told The Post about the challenge and pressure of becoming part of the family of Otto Frank  who  Schloss  said became ânearly obsessedâ with the legacy of his dead youngest child. She later praised him for saving her with his positive perspective.
On Wednesday   Schloss  said itâs important ânot to put her on a pedestalâ and to consider that Frank â had she been a girl today â may well have been a belieber. Frank loved Deanna Durbin  a Canadian American musical film star in the 1930s and 1940s   Schloss  said. Frank âwould have lovedâ Bieber  she said  noting how positive it is that he visited the historic site.
 Schloss  is also part of a new project by the Steven Spielberg-founded Shoah Foundation  which has recorded nearly 52 000 interviews with Nazi-era survivors  and the Institute for Creative Technologies  both at the University of Southern California. Through detailed  prerecorded interviews with survivors â including  Schloss  â the exhibit creates life-size holograms that can âanswerâ questions that some may be afraid to ask in person. At a time when the number of Holocaust survivors is dwindling  the idea is to keep them alive. As time passes  different narratives become accepted until others rise. Some experts warn that the Holocaust not become a âgame â Friedberg said.
 Schloss  has written three books and been the subject of not only the documentary but also a play â much about Frank. But her own story is dramatic.
 Schloss  and her mother never saw the other two again. Her brother  a talented musician  became a painter as a teenager in hiding. After the war  dozens of his paintings and poems were discovered under a floorboard in Amsterdam.

Positive