In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

[Q]: Comment: That's rich coming from a dumb Hawaiian.
[A]: Identity-attack


[Q]: Comment: No more criminal than Arabs and Muslims choosing to live elsewhere and in Europe and North America without restriction. They are flowing into these regions on a regular basis and being largely welcomed. No one is illegal. Not Arabs, not Muslims, not Syrians, not Israelis, not Jews.
[A]: Identity-attack


[Q]: Comment: News flash kids - 99 percent of the buildings in the world are full of asbestos. It was widely used as a fire retardant for decades. Your office building is full of it. The subway is full of it. You can't go anywhere an not come into contact with it. 

So why the chicken-little level of panic?

Unless you go disturbing it and inhaling the dust, it won't hurt anyone. It isn't toxic (in spite of what the press incorrectly reports at every opportunity).  Leave it alone, and let a licensed professional remove it. No problem.

This ridiculous over-reaction by U of T is so typical ... and disappointing.
[A]:
Non-identity-attack