Categorize the comment on the basis of severe toxicity. If the comment is severely toxic output Yes, otherwise output No.

It took forever to log in. And I am doubtful if it will work the next time. Personally I was not bothered by the ignorant, vile, nasty comments. I just thought it showed the stupidity of the posters. I suppose it scared away some timid souls, to be reviled for being a feminazi or a liberal posting agit-prop. 
I worry, since Eugene is a liberal town, that conservative comments, no matter how civil, will be voted down. And what is this algorith? Is it like Carnivore, looking for nasty words like the fword, mf, etc?
Yes

Why is the burden on Alaskans to be "responsible" and give money for this debacle? Let's have the oil companies pay for it first - we could, perhaps, stop hemmorhaging money in tax credits to the oil companies -  then tax every single person who worked for oil companies, then tax the people who have voted in the regime that got us in this mess,  THEN let's see how much money the rest of us have to shell out.
No

That was fast.  Public unions are getting their payback for electing Weddleton, Dunbar, and the rest of the libs before the airwaves even cool off from all the union purchased campaign advertising.

Next we'll get Weddleton peevs shoved down our throats telling us how or what we are allowed to do on our own property.  He really, REALLY likes manipulating title 21 to force a liberal enviro agenda. As long as it's not in his backyard that is.  That's why his nickname is "NIMBY" to the politicians and policy enforcers who've had to deal with him in the past.  Congrats South Anchorage.

No