We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

[Q]: Sent1: If someone is bad enough to be considered for the death penalty then they must have had sure evidence that they are guilty if they are then they shouldn't deserve the right to live among people they could kill
 Sent2: Capital punishment is killing someone as a punishment for a crime they committed.
[A]: Not similar


[Q]: Sent1: So what does he have to do with a debate like this about murderers and the death penalty?
 Sent2: If the same murderer had been given the death penalty, and never released in the first place, he would not be able to kill again.
[A]: Not similar


[Q]: Sent1: Life is a precious thing (after all, you're proposing the death penalty because of killing) and even ONE incorrect execution is one too many.
 Sent2: Yeah, including the human judgment that says that the death penalty is wrong.
[A]:
Not similar