In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: toxic and non-toxic. Toxicity is defiend as anything that is rude, disrespectful, or unreasonable that would make someone want to leave a converation.
--------
Question: Comment: This article is surprising coming from 2 seemingly reasonable bush reps. But I smell a rat, or two.
"No magic bullet?"  Read, & do not fail to understand Dr.Robin Brena's clear analysis of how SB21 crippled & continues to bleed all Alaskans of their Clear & Equitable Share of oil profits.
Merely restructuring the oil/gas credits is a first step, but not even close to enough.
"we lost 1,500 private sector & 1,700 public sector jobs", our bloated gubmut got trimmed, but not nearly enough. No tears for that,
Why do Seaton & Foster not address the Tyranosaurus Rex in the mix - the (what should be criminal) SB21 & its larcenous take of Alaska's profits, set up & now condoned by our own Legislators & carefully not mentioned in this transparent plea for individual Alaskan's to sacrifice their own finances to pad the profits of BigOil?
Seaton & Foster lost a lot of their credibility with their authorship of this Opinion. Why are they afraid of BigOil?
We should have an income & sales tax, too

Answer: Non-toxic


Question: Comment: “constant dialogue with our restaurant owners. We’re always willing to speak with them.”

Except when it comes to airing Timmy's dirty laundry in public.

Answer: Non-toxic


Question: Comment: Not_what_most_of_us_were_taught_in_Catholic_school,_especially_on_confession_and_communion.__In_truth,_everything_thing_in_the_church_adapts_to_each_geneation._That_is_how_knowledge_works._It_exists_in_us_and_not_on_paper_humans_do_nothing_if_not_change.

Answer:
Non-toxic