Categorize the comment on the basis of severe toxicity. If the comment is severely toxic output Yes, otherwise output No.
--------
Question: All you people defending this guy have no scope of the matter. I am a neighbor and this guy has been terrorizing the area for yrs. If you were here in this nhood you would be singing a different tune I guarantee.
Furthermore,  killing the neighbors pet because of boundary issues is ridiculous.  Has anyone ever thought of knocking on the door and talking with someone and figuring it out? Or is "just kill it" is all you can come up with?  The man is a psychopath. Why don't you come up to his house on s4th and d and look at what is on his fence.

Answer: No


Question: I've gone through something of a transformation in thinking myself. I suppose one can dwell on the bad too much, likewise one can choose to simply ignore that which is distasteful. I disagree on the US controlling it's behavior( in a positive way ) which I see as being a major source of destabilization in the world. There are actions that could be taken to reduce the risks, but they're not even being considered AFAIK.

Fortunately I don't have nightmares on this subject, yet. I do wish those in power had them though, truly I do. I can face my own end, I just hope I'm not around if (I think more likely when) the unthinkable happens. That's too depressing, think I'll go watch "On The Beach" to cheer me up . :)

Answer: No


Question: As I understand it, the current situation is this:
1 A Hawaii citizen has a registered firearm
2 This person is convicted of a felony in another state
3 The person returns to Hawaii
4 There is no system in place to inform HPD that the person should no longer have access to a firearm.
5 The person tries to register a new firearm
6 HPD finds out the person should not have any firearms, and requires the individual to give up his firearms

It seems to me that this problem should be solved at the federal level with this change in operations:
1 A Hawaii citizen has a registered firearm
2 This person is convicted of a felony in another state
3 The operators of the federal database inform HPD that person should no longer have a firearm
4 HPD requires the individual to give up his firearms upon their return to Hawaii

It is most likely that I'm completely misreading the situation, law, capabilities of the federal database, or a bunch of other factors. Can someone clear this up for me?

Answer:
No