Categorize the comment on the basis of toxicity. If the comment is toxic (harmful, malicious, derogatory, threat, insult, identity attck, etc.) output Yes, otherwise output No.

I think everyone is looking at this all wrong:

1.) The idiot got himself arrested and sent back to jail where he belongs

and!

2.) a charity got to salvage the moose meat

It's hard enough for food banks to get sufficient amount of food, this idiot hero set them up with hundreds of pounds of lean, antibiotic free, free range organic moose meat. 

Where's the downside?
Yes

The points I found relevant to why persons would use a dispensary over the black market are convenience, knowledgeable information about the selections and variety of choices. It's there if the reader reads carefully. What is missing is that street pot is not tested for additives and pests.
No

My cousin worked for many years as a special education teacher in a small Oregon district.  He finally left because he was, most of the time, the district's only qualified special-ed person.  There was often no support or alternate ways to meet the needs of students.  He was asked to do more than he could do.  

I also see this issue through my service on the Teacher Standards and Practices Commission, where we consider both requirements for special ed teachers and, sometimes, the consequences when teachers are asked to do more than they can do.

What matters is not what the law requires, because the law is an abstraction.  What matters is what people are capable of doing on the ground.   Governments will get the results that are possible, not the results that are theoretically correct.  

If the government's reaction to unmanageable situations is to issue orders that cannot be obeyed, it is time to revisit the underlying issues and how society has chosen to resolve them.

No