We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Q: Sent1: But why do you have to get rid of them by killing them.
 Sent2: I don't believe that they should because if you kill someone, they won't have the chance to either get rehabilitated nor will they have the chance to actually regret what they have done.

A: Not similar
****
Q: Sent1: This argument has been made for the death penalty also.
 Sent2: Therefore the argument of death as a deterent is a joke.

A: Not similar
****
Q: Sent1: if a person kills another person it is murder, whether it is sanctioned by the state or not.
 Sent2: Additionally, i hold the belif that if it is wrong for an individual to kill, then it is also wrong for the state, which is a representation of the individuals, to kill as well.

A:
Similar
****