The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the no-need strategy, otherwise output No. no-need is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used when a participant points out that they do not need an item based on personal context such as suggesting that they have ample water to spare. no-need can directly benefit the opponent since it implies that the item is up for grabs.

[Q]: Context: 
Utterance: 'Hello! I'm packing for my camping adventure.'
[A]: No


[Q]: Context: 'Ya definitely. I need food and firewood most. What do you need?' 'I believe that we have the same priorities.  So we have a large family including children that need the food, but my wife also needs firewood due to poor circulation.  She is susceptible to frost bite and limb loss' 'Okay so how about one of us takes 2 of the food and 1 of the firewood, and the other takes 1 of the food and 2 of the firewood?'
Utterance: 'that sounds fair.  I will take 1 food, 2 firewood, and 2 water, thus giving you 2 food, 1 firewood, 1 water'
[A]: No


[Q]: Context: 'Hi! I like to hike so I really need more water. Could I take 2 packages of water and 1 of food and 2 of firewood?' 'I am ok with the water, i just would like one water and one food, but i would appreciate two firewoods, i get cold at night  '
Utterance: 'We both sound pretty reasonable! So you think you need 2 firewood?'
[A]:
No