In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Comment: In the US system, the president has the authority to fill over 4700 positions.  As a president who campaigned on the GOP ticket and as a conservative, he will appoint a considerable number of conservatives.  But unlike here where the PM is constrained by having to choose from a small number of MPs and having to give consideration to racial and regional representations and now, stupidly, having to also choose 50% women and 50% men, the US president can actually choose from the best qualified people to fill specific cabinet - and other -roles regardless of their ideology.   

On Sunday, in front of millions of viewers of 60 Minutes, the Trump children were asked if they would serve in their father's administration.  They all said no, they would concentrate on running the Trump business empire.   

Sorry if conservative appointments offend you and Judith M. so but this is what voters in THE ELECTION (as opposed to the liberal mob rule in the streets) voted for.   

Remain calm.
Non-sexual-explicit

Comment: Majesctic Loucks!
Non-sexual-explicit

Comment: its nut job left wingers like you that will prove the NDP will never again win in alberta! , your comments reek of bias stupidity. Keep in mind the current state of alberta as investment continues to LEAVE!,, i do blame the ndp for higher taxes and government that is the cause of it and will continue to hold alberta back just like the left is doing in ontario

Non-sexual-explicit