We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gay Marriage) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gay marriage. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gay marriage.

[EX Q]: If you seek to deny anyone their civil rights based upon your religious views then you are the enemy of freedom.
[EX A]: Valid

[EX Q]: If letting judges carry out constitutional interpretation was really what they were looking for, they would not complain when that interpretation doesn't go their way.
[EX A]: Invalid

[EX Q]: 2) NARTH's article DID NOT show any "higher homosexual activity" because of legalized gay marriage.
[EX A]:
Valid