In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Example Input: Comment: A gun is needed to shoot someone.
Example Output: Non-sexual-explicit

Example Input: Comment: It's unfortunate that you only interact with women with whom you pay to perform sex.  The woman who resides in the White House is a whore (a profession with which you seem quite familiar).  She received payment for marrying the offensive ogre that many consider our president.  Now, that we understand your limited intellectual abilities, shut the fuck up!
Example Output: Sexual-explicit

Example Input: Comment: Although I admire Fr. Martin's efforts to build bridges between the LGBT community and the hierarchy, I think he's naive about the bishops desperately wanting to reach out to gays and not being sure how?  How?  That's easy, at least to start.  I would propose the following three very, very initial steps.  #1:  Hold one (or preferably several) listening sessions with the LGBT community.  Have it facilitated well, but, Your Excellencies, shut your mouths!!!  Let gays talk about their experience and perhaps, for just a moment - mirabili dictu - they can be your teachers!  #2: Allow the gay community to celebrate the Eucharist on Sundays as a community (as in Chicago's AGLO).  #3:  Establish in your (arch)diocese an office whose explicit purpose is to be about the continuing work of building bridges.
Example Output:
Non-sexual-explicit