Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.

Input: Consider Input: Sanders isn't a Democrat.  He's merely highjacking the Democratic party because he can't get on any ballot as an independent. 

Sanders admits he needs revolution to win.  Revolutionaries may have hope for him, but there will be no national revolution on the Democratic side of this election. Poor people don't have time to revolt. Only their champion/nannies have the time and money for revolution.

Sanders means what he says, but so does Cruz. Neither can get any of their sky pies baked by the legislators that they caucus with, let alone get any support from the other side.

If Sanders should by some miracle win the Democrats' nomination he will be red-baited and portrayed as Che, beret and all. Hillary can't do that to him--she needs the more rational supporters of Sanders to vote for her, unless his supporters prefer a President Trump.  

America can't survive another "President Gore--woops" situation. Trump will give a whole new meaning to the phrase "executive action."

Output: No


Input: Consider Input: Years of Democrat obstruction, Obamacare for instance, and the nuclear option by Reid, now it is time the Republicans play with the same playbook.  Let the people voice their vote with the election.  Then the Senate can hold hearings.

Output: No


Input: Consider Input: The problem is that tens of millions of adult Americans work for less than a living wage.  I work in a production environment.  My job doesn't require a degree, but we have to do math, and we have to be focused.  There are no teenagers at my workplace.  Most of us are middle-aged, experienced people with a good work ethic.  When someone comes in who's not so bright, or has bad work habits, they get cycled out very quickly.  Yet most of us earn less than $12 per hour.  Our economy has devolved to the point where employers can have grownups for a teenager's wage.  It's nice for them, but not so good for the employees, or for society.

We could have a low teenage wage, or a low first 30-days on the job wage.  If it's really a job that requires no knowledge and no experience, then those employers will be okay with kids and high-turnover adults.  Employers who want grownups should pay a living wage.  A full-time worker should be able to rent an apartment.


Output: No