We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

If guns are more advanced now, then that's all the more reason we should have the right to defend ourselves against them, not less.
Valid

Governments are addicted to removing people's rights, and every effort should be made to prevent them from doing so.
Valid

Therefore, this defendant still has a claim to the right, and the question now becomes which test to use to determine whether the law violates his RKBA.

Valid