instruction:
In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
question:
Comment: "Hours after B.C. announced its tax on foreign buyers this past summer, prominent developers e-mailed Premier Christy Clark and her government saying the policy amounted to a betrayal of Metro Vancouver’s international citizens".

That's funny, for so many years it has been the developers and other real estate industrialists who have been telling us over and over again that, no no no, it is not foreign money that is skyrocketing the house prices in Vancouver, no no no, it is domestic demand from local workers and believe us, any loudmouth who claims the buying is from overseas money from international citizens, well, those loudmouths are a bunch of racist, hateful, bigoted, xenophobic, delusional propagandists.

My, oh my, how plainly the deceit reveals itself, when one goes back and re-reads the first sentence of the article, about the subsequent e-mails of those real estate shills angrily responding to the new tax...
answer:
Agree


question:
Comment: The arts have been , are .and hopefully always will be one of the first expressions of dissent . You'll have to get used to it Mr.Trump
answer:
Agree


question:
Comment: Masculinity is no more toxic than Femininity. The problem is "Progressive" Left individuals such as Denise do not understand the difference between men being Masculine and men being  sexual predators. Harvey Weinstein was a sexual predator, that has nothing to do with Masculinity.
answer:

Agree