The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the vouch-fair strategy, otherwise output No. vouch-fair is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to call out fairness for personal benefit, either when acknowledging a fair deal or when the opponent offers a deal that benefits them. This can be through an explicit call out or can be implied.

Example Input: Context: 'I was hoping for a decent amount of food, just in case my new recipes don't work out, lol. 🙂' 'Haha, makes sense. I'm also interested in food. What if I take 2 waters and 1 food, and you take 1 water and 2 food?' 'I would be okay with that if I could also have all of the firewood. It seems fair since you will be getting the most water. Would that work for you?'
Utterance: 'That seems like a lot to compensate for just 1 water. How about I also get 1 firewood?'
Example Output: Yes

Example Input: Context: 'Are you bringing guest?' 'I am a campaign partner' 'Oh. What does that mean?'
Utterance: 'No I am the only person who come with you'
Example Output: No

Example Input: Context: 'Since I am giving you all of the firewood that you said was most important to you, I feel I should get at least the same amount of items as you, especially since you are getting exactly the firewood you want. I will need to stick to three waters and two food.' 'The firewood is most important to me to be sure. However, if you get more food and all of the water I could end up going hungry.☹️' 'Well I would be happy to exchange you one of your firewood for the one water you need. That way you won't go thirsty.'
Utterance: 'Hmm, no I think I will agree with your first arrangement. I get 3 firewood and 1 food.'
Example Output:
Yes