In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence can be inferred from the statement. Incorrect choices change the meaning in important ways or have details that are not mentioned in the statement. Indicate your answer as 1,2, or 3 corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.
--------
Question: Statement: Next, pass under a series of soaring gopurams, where you can witness religion as a full-time daily occupation. Choices:  1. Religious observance has become even more popular in recent years. 2. Most people here don't take their faith very seriously. 3. Religion is a pervasive and omnipresent occupation.

Answer: 3


Question: Statement: Neither Shakespeare (who alludes to the incident only in passing) nor history offers any justification for this gross violation of the laws of  Was there, as it was later claimed, some sudden movement on the part of French cavalry which lead Henry to fear an attack from the rear? Choices:  1. Henry was afraid of an attack. 2. Henry was afraid of an attack by the French. 3. Henry was not afraid of anything.

Answer: 1


Question: Statement: Participants referred to a landmark study on financial reporting by the Jenkins Committee4 as evidence that little has changed. Choices:  1. Participants felt that everything was different, citing the study as evidence. 2. The study was used as evidence that things were still the same. 3. The Jenkins Committee wrote the study a year ago.

Answer:
2