In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: threat and non-threat. Threat is a statement that someone will be hurt or harmed, especially if the person does not do something in particular.

Ex Input:
Comment: He may have attended Robert E. Lee High. He thinks it's free speech only if one can get away with yelling" Kill the Jews and Blacks". If you yell " Kill the Nazis and White Supremacists", that's not protected by free speech.

Ex Output:
Threat


Ex Input:
Comment: He killed 2 Troopers !!!! Execute him,end of story !!!

Ex Output:
Threat


Ex Input:
Comment: I wasn't aware of those two acts he's signed - I'd like to know more about them.

I have a hard time agreeing that it is just partisan politics, however. Trump has said extremely sexist things, and anyone who thinks they treat people fairly should be offended by the diminishing sexist comments he's made. He has also rallied against planned parenthood which receives federal funding and is a vital resource to women's health (and no, it's not just an abortion factory which the right keeps trying to paint it as). 

From a cultural perspective I think it's important to speak out against the blatantly sexist things Trump has said and to be very diligent about legislation he may block or pass that affects women's rights. 

For the most part this is about ideas - not so much about specific legislation. To think that his actions should dismiss his rhetoric isn't logical. You can't dismiss racist comments just because someone hasn't enacted racist legislation for example. It is what it is.

Ex Output:

Non-threat