We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

Ex Input:
We exhibit to mankind the remarkable spectacle of a people attacked by unprovoked enemies, without any imputation or even suspicion of offence.

Ex Output:
Valid


Ex Input:
So if you want to ban guns, 1,531,764 people will get killed or injured, and you'll only take guns out of the hands of those who don't even commit gun crimes.

Ex Output:
Valid


Ex Input:
The allusion was to some kind of mental problem that makes someone buy far more weapons and ammunition than they could possibly need for sport or self-defense.

Ex Output:

Valid