We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Example Input: Sent1: maybe we should start with what crimes warrant the death penalty.
 Sent2: And it seems that every time we start talking about the death penalty, that we end up talking about whether or not it deters crime.
Example Output: Not similar

Example Input: Sent1: With trials and appeals, one execution can end up costing more than a life sentence by the time the execution is actually carried out.
 Sent2: Actually, the idea that the death penalty costs more than lifetime imprisonment has been disproved many times.
Example Output: Similar

Example Input: Sent1: The death penalty has been found to be a more effective deterrent to crimes against children.
 Sent2: The death penalty doesn't need to serve as a deterrent to crime.
Example Output:
Similar