instruction:
In this task, you're given a statement, and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence clearly disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3' corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.
question:
Statement: He's neither immune to the professor's charm nor untroubled by what the professor says about the Northern  a culture war in which Yankees imposed their imperialist and capitalist will on the agrarian South, just as they had done to the Irish and Scots. Choices:  1. The professor was talking about the East and the West. 2. The professor was talking about the North and the South. 3. The professor was talking about the North and the South; it was a subject that he is passionate about.
answer:
1


question:
Statement: It is sufficient to note, however, that Stevenson was content to rely on a mix of his own admitted bloodthirstiness and good old-fashioned prejudice for his conclusion. Choices:  1. Stevenson relied on his thirst for blood and prejudice.  2. Stevenson was just and relied on the truth. 3. Stevenson will do anything to get ahead. 
answer:
2


question:
Statement: The case for not acting until you have to was put most vividly by Senate Assistant Majority Leader Don Nickles of Oklahoma, in a remark that also captures the hard-nosed attitude regarding humanitarian concerns. Choices:  1. They were so vague it was hard to tell if they were for or against the case. 2. They were on the same page. 3. The statement summarized their sentiment.
answer:

1