Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.

Input: Consider Input: Ummm....the ocean belongs to its inhabitants- the only infestation is the human garbage and pollution and greedy fisherpeople.

Output: No


Input: Consider Input: Susan L. Fenton suggested I "should try adopting a zygote" so I would learn "the difference between a zygote and an actual person."  

Fenton is obviously ignorant about what is known as surrogacy. An introduction can be read online at: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Surrogacy  

The following quotes from the "Surrogacy" Wikipedia article are telling.

QUOTES: "Gestational surrogacy (GS)
A surrogate is implanted with an embryo created by IVF. The resulting child is genetically unrelated to the surrogate. There are several sub-types of gestational surrogacy as noted below. ...
Gestational surrogacy and donor embryo (GS/DE)
A donor embryo is implanted in a surrogate; such embryos may be available when others undergoing IVF have embryos left over, which they opt to donate to others. The resulting child is genetically unrelated to the intended parent(s) and genetically unrelated to the surrogate."

In a GS/DE, a "genetically unrelated" embryo (previously a zygote) is being legally adopted.

Output: Yes


Input: Consider Input: Rural communities get government funding to replace their tank farms and diesel power plants.  Then there's ADEC and EPA and the Coast Guard and all of the other government expenditures driven by the risk of toxic oil spills (seen any boom stretched around solar panels lately?).  And must we get into the massive tax deductions and credits slathered onto the entire oil supply chain, compliments of campaign bribes and lobbyists?  And then there are the externalities of spewing fossil carbon into the air...but those don't exist on your planet, do they?   

Now, you were talking about subsidies?  Do tell.


Output: No