The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the elicit-pref strategy, otherwise output No. elicit-pref is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used to discover the preference order of the opponent in the negotiation.

[EX Q]: Context: 'Splitting the food is what I was thinking as well, but I'd also like to split the firewood. We can split the water or I'm fine taking all of that.' 'I would be willing to take 2 firewood, 3 food, and 1 water if that would work for you.  ' 'Hmm I think I should take 2 food, 1 firewood, and 3 water. What do you think?'
Utterance: 'Is your first priority the water?  I'm definitely willing to split up by what is most important to us both.'
[EX A]: Yes

[EX Q]: Context: 'Hi! I like to hike so I really need more water. Could I take 2 packages of water and 1 of food and 2 of firewood?'
Utterance: 'I am ok with the water, i just would like one water and one food, but i would appreciate two firewoods, i get cold at night  '
[EX A]: No

[EX Q]: Context: 'That won't work. Because, we are planning for a campfire. And so, we are in need of fire wood. I hope you understand.🙂🙂🙂' 'I understand. We are also planning a campfire, and have a lot of young kids who will need the fire to stay warm. So that's why I feel I need two firewoods. 🙂' 'Sorry for apologize. Here we are having old aged people here. I need two packages of food. Otherwise two of firewood.🙂'
Utterance: 'I understand. I am willing to give you two packages of food if I can have two firewoods. I would also like two waters due to it being hot out for our hike. 🙂'
[EX A]:
No