Given a document, an entity and its sentiment towards the entity, verify if it is the correct sentiment towards the entity. Answer should be yes or no. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

[EX Q]: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Davis is Negative . Davis challenged his conviction and sentence on the grounds that his confession was illegally obtained and that his trial in San Clara County  Calif.  was tainted by pretrial publicity.
 Marc Klaas  Polly's father  expressed frustration Monday that Davis' appeals were taking too long. He noted that Polly would be 28 now had she lived.
Davis' appeals were taking too long. He noted that Polly would be 28 now had she lived.
 "I have no doubt that this guy is going to outlive me " said Klaas  60.
 Davis has a constitutional challenge pending before the state high court. Once that is resolved  he can challenge his conviction and sentence in federal court.
 Assistant California Attorney General Ronald Matthias  who successfully opposed DavisDavis' appeal  said federal appeals could take 10 to 15 years.
 In writing for the court  Justice Joyce L. Kennard recounted DavisDavis' reaction when a jury found him guilty of Polly's murder.
 Davis "turned toward the television cameras in the courtroom and made an obscene gesture with both hands by extending his middle fingers " Kennard wrote. "He then winked his eye and blew a kiss."
 Davis kidnapped Polly from her bedroom at her home in Petaluma  Calif.  where she was having a slumber party with two other girls. Her mother and a younger half-sister were sleeping down the hall.
 Davis had a long and violent criminal record  and his history helped fuel voter support for a 1994 three-strikes initiative in California that required sentences of 25 years to life in prison for a third felony after two violent felonies.
[EX A]: no

[EX Q]: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Mike Freeman is Positive . Hennepin County Attorney Mike Freeman  declined to confirm the grand jury  citing the secrecy of any such proceeding  but said  he  still intends to make  his  own decision on whether to charge the officer.
Justine Ruszczyk Damond  a 40-year-old life coach  was killed by Minneapolis Officer Mohamed Noor just minutes after she called police to report a possible sexual assault in the alley behind her home. Noor hasn't been charged  and  Freeman  said weeks ago that more investigating was needed in the case. He also told activists in a recorded conversation that he didn't have enough evidence and investigators "haven't done their job."
In recent years   Freeman  has said he would no longer use grand juries to decide whether officers would be charged in police shootings  saying he would make those decisions himself to provide more accountability and transparency.
Marsh Halberg  a criminal defense attorney who is not connected to this case  said it could give  Freeman  a strategic advantage by requiring witnesses to testify under oath and lock down witness testimony in advance of a possible trial. Still  Halberg said  it's unclear whether a grand jury can be used strictly for investigative purposes on the state level  and it's not something he has seen in his 40-year career.
Halberg said  Freeman  could be using the grand jury as "a tactical reason to get evidence from people who are maybe refusing to testify."
Robert Bennett  an attorney for the Damond family  said he and the family support  Freeman 's use of the grand jury and think it's the right thing to do. Bennett said it's disappointing that subpoenas were necessary to get witnesses  including police officers  to be truthful.
Noor's attorney  Thomas Plunkett  issued a statement saying  Freeman 's comments "leave me unclear as to what he is doing." He added that "it would be unethical and potentially unlawful to comment publicly on this development. Worse â any public comment would jeopardize the fairness of an important judicial function."
The grand jury process has been criticized for its secrecy and because it rarely results in charges against officers.  Freeman  broke precedent with the standard practice of using grand juries to decide charges in police shootings after the November 2015 death of Jamar Clark.  Freeman  noted at that time that grand juries had been used to consider police shootings in  his  county for more than 40 years and no officers had been indicted.
[EX A]: no

[EX Q]: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Gayle King is Neutral . "CBS This Morning" co-host Gayle King  said Tuesday  she  thinks  her  best friend  Oprah Winfrey  is "intrigued by the idea" of challenging President Donald Trump for the White House in 2020  but  she 's not "actively considering" a campaign.
"I absolutely don't think that  her  position has changed "  King  said during the early morning program. "I don't. You know  I was up talking to  her  very late last night. I do think this though  guys. I do think  she 's intrigued by the idea."
 King  continued that  she  also knows after years of watching Winfrey's television show  "you always have a right to change your mind."
"I don't think at this point  she  is actually considering it " said  King . "Listen  there are people who have said they want to be  her  campaign manager  who want to quit their jobs and campaign for  her .  She  loves this country and would like to be of service in some way  but I don't think that  she 's actively considering it."
Speculation started growing about Winfrey's political ambitions after  her  speech at Sunday night's Golden Globe awards  and was spurred more when  her  longtime companion  Stedman Graham  told the Los Angeles Times that  she  would "absolutely" run  but the decision was "up to the people."
"Stedman says that he thought the reporter said to him 'Would she make a good president?' And he said  'absolutely she would '" said  King . "Stedman would never so cavalierly say absolutely she would do it  it's up to the people. He would never do that."
Meanwhile   King  said the Golden Globes producers had wanted Winfrey to cut her speech to about three minutes long. She insisted in keeping it at six minutes  and after applause was factored in  it timed out at nine minutes.
"I think the producers thought that was worth going late for "  King  said. "She wanted that moment to be more than women wearing black dresses of solidarity. She really did want to speak to young girls around the country."
[EX A]:
yes