We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

Example Input: However although our constitution needs exceptions (no yelling "fire" in a movie theater, and background checks for guns), no rights in the bill of rights should be outright banned.
Example Output: Valid

Example Input: Obviously gun control is doing nothing to make California any safer, otherwise these numbers wouldn't be able to take place in such an alarmingly easy manner.
Example Output: Valid

Example Input: Gun hater pilot will then say why do you need to target shoot if you no longer need guns to hunt or defend yourself?
Example Output:
Valid