Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.

Q: When the Wehrmacht had belt buckles which claimed that  "Gott Mit Uns";  the Japanese had the code Bushido which authorized and encouraged the beheading of any opponent who surrendered as being a "dishonorable" person (and did so from the battle of Midway on), and committed The Rape of Nanking, the Korean "comfort women's" enslavement;  and the US and Great Britain and its allies chose to allow the continued extermination of the Jews and all those other undesirables in the Nazi death camps for strategic reasons; when Russia, once they were any ally, was encouraged by the other allies to commit their atrocities wherever they conquered, 'moral superiority' is virtually an invisible commodity by any National participant. 

The victors wrote the histories.  That is your 'moral superiority'  in World War II.

A: Yes
****
Q: You might have a point if you could actually go to a store and buy bombs but you can't.

A: No
****
Q: Chris Cropley,
What's racist is using race or sex as any part of the selection process. 
You declaring that a white man cannot be the most qualified applicant is the most racist and sexist statement I've read in some time.

A:
Yes
****