We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gay Marriage) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gay marriage. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gay marriage.

Ex Input:
*SOAWatch, a movement to challenge American foreign policy and its support for tyrants in Latin America, by calling annual attention to the School of the Americas which trains fascist terrorists.

Ex Output:
Invalid


Ex Input:
Gay people sometimes do get married to opposite-sex spouses, often because they are struggling with their sexual orientation and are trying, through marriage, to make themselves heterosexual.

Ex Output:
Valid


Ex Input:
Secondly marriage is so much more than just a union, it is pretty much the centre of our society and the height of commitment and finally homosexuals can be religious too, so why shouldn't they want a religious ceremony?

Ex Output:

Valid