In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence can be inferred from the statement. Incorrect choices change the meaning in important ways or have details that are not mentioned in the statement. Indicate your answer as 1,2, or 3 corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.

[Q]: Statement: Neither Shakespeare (who alludes to the incident only in passing) nor history offers any justification for this gross violation of the laws of  Was there, as it was later claimed, some sudden movement on the part of French cavalry which lead Henry to fear an attack from the rear? Choices:  1. Henry was afraid of an attack. 2. Henry was afraid of an attack by the French. 3. Henry was not afraid of anything.
[A]: 1


[Q]: Statement: A law-and-order backlash is also possible. Choices:  1. There could be a backlash after the announcement is made. 2. There won't be any backlash. 3. There could be a backlash.
[A]: 3


[Q]: Statement: A horse sitter mistakenly thought Mr. Ed was having a seizure and gave him a tranquilizer. Choices:  1. The horse sitter accidentally gave Mr. Ed a haircut because he thought he was having a heart attack.  2. The horse sitter gave the tranquilizer to Mr. Ed because he thought he was having a seizure.  3. Mr. Ed died from the accidental tranquilizer dosage. 
[A]:
2