In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Q: Comment: BUT!    These kids can tell you all about sexual intercourse, the name of all of the body parts, what oral sex is, and that 2 mommies and 2 daddies is normal, not to forget the world needs them to save it.....and that Trudeau is awesome and Harper was bad.   This is what happens when social engineering trumps basic school subjects.

A: Sexual-explicit
****
Q: Comment: It's like the track. Go to one at the end of the day and you see people sitting, in shock, holding well-thumbed tickets that no matter how much they check and recheck them, are not giving them back their last $20. And now how to get home? Call their daughter and explain, again, how they were so close this time? A voluntary tax on the poor who pay for my fancy new hockey facility. Water on the bench! It's atrocious.

A: Non-sexual-explicit
****
Q: Comment: As a (now former) Carrier employee I can tell you the lady quoted in this article does not speak for all carrier employees. I can also tell you that this first layoff consisted largely of employees who chose to take the buyout package so if she is leaving she's also taking lump of cash with her, a pension, up to 4 years of free college and 4 months of insurance with her, instead of a goodbye and a boot in the ass.  I"m personally thankful for the jobs that Trump was able to keep in Indy. Unlike the selfish low info people being interviewed I realize that every job kept benefits my community.

A:
Sexual-explicit
****