In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence can be inferred from the statement. Incorrect choices change the meaning in important ways or have details that are not mentioned in the statement. Indicate your answer as 1,2, or 3 corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.

Ex Input:
Statement: Anyone who knew Tony Lukas even slightly was deeply impressed by his boundless, open-minded curiosity about the injustices of modern life, along with his stubborn reportorial integrity about getting to the very bottom of any story as best he could. Choices:  1. Tony Lukas was an elitist.  2. People who knew Tony Lukas were impressed by his curiosity and integrity in the news field.  3. Tony Lukas was open minded, curious and stubborn. 

Ex Output:
2


Ex Input:
Statement: He decided that Tuppence, in the throes of anxiety, had gone to the police, and that his disappearance having been made public the gang had not been slow to put two and two together. Choices:  1. The gang was after him for stealing their jewels and they thought that he was still missing.  2. He thought that Tuppence, being full of angst, went to law enforcement and that public knowledge of the fact that he was missing made public the group didn't put the two facts together.  3. Tuppence was content and lacked worry and didn't leave the house. 

Ex Output:
2


Ex Input:
Statement: Over the entrance to the U.S. Choices:  1. Over exiting the US. 2. A debate of entry into the USA.  3. Over getting into the United States. 

Ex Output:

3