We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

An interesting side note, there is a local guy here who carries a black powder pistol (wheel gun) for protection since concealed carry is theoretically illegal in kansas (though you can get a permit if you know the right people :) ).
Valid

"Gun control" is an illegal and unConstitutional fiction for hoplophobes to cling to instead of sucking their fingers or thumb.
Valid

Conditioning / qualifying the right to arms on militia service is disrespecting the fundamental principle of conferred powers and retained rights.

Valid