We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

Input: Consider Input: The lunatic fringe here has called me anti gun as well, and I can just about promise I have more guns than any 5 of them put together.

Output: Valid


Input: Consider Input: People constantly trumpet about how having a gun means that they can protect themselves, but first they must be able to fire the gun on another human being, something that most people find hard to do.

Output: Valid


Input: Consider Input: That said, the idea that non gun homicides dont increase does not show causation between high gun ownership and increased murder rates.


Output: Valid