In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Q: Comment: I don't appreciate either the writing (such as it is) or the sentiment.  The writing style is incoherent because these selfish individuals don't have any arguments to rationalize their presumed "privilege" to place wildlife and other human users of our rapidly fragmenting wilderness at risk.

Typical of the entitlement mentality crowd, it's all about THEM. Fact is once a bear has been aggravated into attacking a person, it's almost always destroyed because of the entirely rational concern the bear will subsequently be less afraid of humans after attacking one and coming away unscathed (which is usually the case). And this nose-ringed nitwit's solution? She'll wear a "don't kill the bear" tattoo! Yay.  THAT oughtta help.

"Never underestimate the power of human stupidity."--R. A. Heinlein

A: Non-obscene
****
Q: Comment: These are not the words our "globalist" PM needs to be told.  These will just fill his egotistical head with even more visions of grandeur. 

He needs to be told to stop giving away billions of  Canadian tax money in pursuit of his Nobel Peace Prize, and to start paying attention to the many real problems in Canada.

A: Non-obscene
****
Q: Comment: I am speechless.  Hope these people don't reproduce.

A:
Non-obscene
****