In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

[EX Q]: Comment: He's lucky he only got small kine licks...should have gotten some major lickins
[EX A]: Sexual-explicit

[EX Q]: Comment: "I also teach them how to honor the ladies they are attracted to by respecting them enough not to want to violate them physically and waiting until they are ready to make a lifelong commitment." 
So once you and your "lady" made a lifelong commitment did you physically violate her? Now I see why evangelical Christians like you AlwaysThere, have so wholeheartedly embraced Trump--you have similar values--you wait to "physically violate" until after marriage while Trump doesn't.
"Grab ’em by the p***y. You can do anything." Donald Trump
[EX A]: Sexual-explicit

[EX Q]: Comment: Senator Meredith was appointed. If he had to seek re-election it is unlikely he would win a seat.
He just barely squeezed within the law as regards to sexual exploitation of a child. Were he an MP the embarrassment he brought to his party would have gotten him kicked out of caucus long ago.

This is the problem with an appointed Senate. Its members are getting away with actions that are clearly unacceptable to the taxpayers  but seem to be acceptable to his peers and to those who appointed him.

Get this guy of the public teat.
[EX A]:
Sexual-explicit