In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Input: Consider Input: Comment: Justin Tanoue: I'm laughing my mother f***ing A$$ off!!!!

Thank YOU for providing my morning coffee-through-the-nose moment!!!!

Output: Sexual-explicit


Input: Consider Input: Comment: Trid sees nothing wrong with "No Dogs or Jews", "We don't serve Muslims" and so on. He supports bigotry. And no, that is NOT a straw man, but the clear and obvious implication of your " If either the buyer or the seller does not want to enter into that contract for whatever reason then I believe they have the right to refuse." Thank you for proving that your claim to being a Christian is a complete sham.

Output: Non-sexual-explicit


Input: Consider Input: Comment: I agree with Teresa Shook, who says, "Politics has no business basing decisions on religion — covertly or overtly." I also agree that the legislators who failed to support this bill are "cowards," lacking the courage to do the right thing and caving in to the loud minority who would force their religious beliefs on the majority.


Output: Non-sexual-explicit