TASK DEFINITION: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.
PROBLEM: Comment: Yeah, I often see the truck with all the dead baby pigs in it, and I'm pretty sure that the Department of Health and USDA would not approve.  Does not meet their storage, transportation, and sale regs.  Plus, seeing them all piled up is horrific.  The driver rolls up the door and boom, instant tragic atrocity right in your face.  Haven't seen the chickens and ducks, but I imagine it's the same issues with them too.

SOLUTION: Non-sexual-explicit

PROBLEM: Comment: CO ACA is already a huge mess.  We just had our third policy in four years get canceled thanks to this stupid law.

SOLUTION: Non-sexual-explicit

PROBLEM: Comment: Hmmm we are constantly told that women only make up a small minority of STEM field positions. How is it then that this small minority is going to get 38% of the research chairs?
.
If only 10% of advanced research positions in physics are occupied by women then giving them 38% of the Canada Research Chairs means some of the very brightest people are not getting the chairs and some of the chairs are going to people who don't deserve them.. 
.
I wonder how top male researchers will respond to this country giving them the brush-off? Perhaps some will go to a country that would appreciate my talents and not judge me on my genitals.

SOLUTION:
Sexual-explicit