Categorize the comment on the basis of severe toxicity. If the comment is severely toxic output Yes, otherwise output No.
--------
Question: The weather in Alberta and Alaska are very similar.  You must not live in Alaska.   Please go whine about the ADN somewhere else.  You  are not supposed to be spamming the comments of weather related stories with your opinions about pedophiles.   How is the fire risk in Alaska related to Mr. Dalton, Sir?  Explain it, because it's obvious to no one but you.

Or are you obsessed with sex and wand to draw the entire commenting community into your sick little world sir?  Some of us don't want to read about pedophiles, otherwise we would click on those stories.  Please stop hijacking the comments!!!!!!

Answer: Yes


Question: I would agree if we were talking about ancient history, but we're not. The trust issue is current and severe, and the past decisions are recent (and some are current). You and your colleagues may not feel mistrust, but it's pretty clear that a large percentage of the people feel differently.

For the record, I am not opposed to expanding the URD. I'm pretty much on the fence on the issue. I am, however, powerfully concerned that we don't have a city government that can be trusted. If the city decides to break its promise and trust with the people, that is only for the worse for everybody involved, including downtown businesses. It will also increase the opposition to any future city plans.

Answer: No


Question: This is about bars protecting themselves from America's predatory law industry. Too bad bars can't sue the troublemakers.

Answer:
No