We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

[EX Q]: Sent1: It also give the right to equipment with which you could execute murders, armed robberies and other violent crime.
 Sent2: You can debate that without guns there would be more deaths to other weapons although you can't debate it would be to the same extent as gun murders and crimes would be.
[EX A]: Not similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: As said,I think the people of the USA are quite capable of deciding about their own gun laws without a Brit getting involved but to make guns freely available to British citizens would be a bad, bad idea.
 Sent2: I also say that when people commit a crime with a gun these people need to be punished not the law-abiding citizens!
[EX A]: Not similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: The first part indicates the importance of the militia, the second part illustrates that the people may be part of that well regulated body or not without infringement of their right to keep and bear arms.
 Sent2: In order to have a 'well regulated' militia you can not bar the civilian populace of its right to keep and bear arms!
[EX A]:
Similar