In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Comment: This might sound harsh and I'm ok with you thinking so... Here is my thought on what Masuma Khan had to say about the white people who can kiss her ass. It goes as follows...
Words right out of a terrorist's mouth!!
Masuma Khan posts on Facebook... "White fragility can kiss my ass. Your white tears aren't sacred, your land is." This doesn't sound very Canadian to me, sounds more like the threat of a terrorist. We, real true Canadians, don't take kindly to threats... You think we are frail - we have a surprise for you! Watch out white people - this woman will stab you in the back without thinking twice.
She should not just face disciplinary action for her racist remark... she should be put on the "Terrorist Watch List". What she said was a direct threat to the white race .. who are we kidding??
Her words are no different than those of the ISIS terrorist's who post their threats to the World Cup...
At least we white's know who our friends are .. definitely not her.
KICK HER OUT!!
Sexual-explicit

Comment: because Trump is a self confessed sex offender such as this convicted sex offender you support as in essentially accusing the victim of lying...your words not mine. you only know what you read in the Guard but yet again you accuse the victim of lying. third you agree with Outsider 77 because you can't stand on your own.  next time you accuse a victim of being sexually abused by a grown man pull your fat head out of your old ass long enough to see the facts before your run your mouth.
Sexual-explicit

Comment: Good point....the provinces signing on, have it right, and the rest are whining ingrates,especially Manitoba's premier who vacates the province two months at a time, while major fed discussions are going on!

Non-sexual-explicit