In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine the neutral choice based on your inference from the statement and your commonsense knowledge. The neutral choice is a sentence that neither agrees nor disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3', corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence. If sentence X agrees with sentence Y, one's correctness follows from the other one. If sentence X disagrees with sentence Y, they can not be correct at the same time.

Q: Statement: but they began to cut back because of the oil problems but um you know they would have have um so many community outdoor theaters and and like uh community Choices: 1. The oil problems benefited them greatly. 2. The oil problems caused them to cut back on community upgrades. 3. The oil problems caused them to cut back.

A: 2
****
Q: Statement: He would have had ample time to remove them and destroy them." Choices: 1. He didn't know where they were hidden. 2. He'd have had enough time to burn them. 3. He'd have had plenty of time to destroy them.

A: 2
****
Q: Statement: The second version, posed by a Reuters correspondent, was whether Bush thought rumors of his cocaine use were being planted. Choices: 1. A Reuters correspondent suspected Bush of using chocolate. 2. A Reuters correspondent suspected Bush of using cocaine. 3. A Reuters correspondent suspected Bush of using cocaine, but it was never proved.

A:
3
****