The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.

[EX Q]: Context: 'hmm, here's what I'm willing to do. I will take all the water, one firewood and one food.' 'That doesn't sound fair to me.' 'Ok, what would you counter offer with?'
Utterance: 'I would like all 3 packages of firewood and 1 package of food. You can have the rest.'
[EX A]: No

[EX Q]: Context: 'I know how that goes...We are planning on hiking too and we could also use some extra food.' 'well I am sure between you and me we will find a way....' 'I really need some food, but I could also use extra firewood. It is supposed to be pretty cold at night and we would love to cook up some smores.'
Utterance: 'I hear you we have the same issues well you can have either 2 food or 2 firewood what would you prefer?'
[EX A]: Yes

[EX Q]: Context: 'I too need extra water, but I'm willing to negotiate on the other things if you are! 🙂' 'If I take 2 waters, will you accept 2 firewood?' 'You take 2 waters, I'll take 2 firewood and 2 food?'
Utterance: 'What about you take 1 water and the firewood.  I take 2 waters and all the food'
[EX A]:
No