In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

Input: Consider Input: Sentence: Paul tried to call George on the phone, but he wasn't available.
 Reason: The 'he' refers to george because of his age, but George could be referring to George and David. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

Output: Wrong


Input: Consider Input: Sentence: We went to the lake, because a shark had been seen at the ocean beach, so it was a safer place to swim.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the lake because of its proximity to the ocean and its location close to the northern coast. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

Output: Wrong


Input: Consider Input: Sentence: Beth didn't get angry with Sally, who had cut her off, because she stopped and apologized.
 Reason: The 'she' refers to sally because beth didn't get angry because she stopped and counted to ten. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 


Output: Wrong