In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Example Input: Comment: The Alt left always complained a few bad apples on the right  contaminates the whole barrel. Now the alt left is telling me the bad actors of Islam does not contaminate the barrel. I say Islam is Islam and there's no getting away from it otherwise you are a heretic and you die
Example Output: Non-obscene

Example Input: Comment: Hillary,  the lying phony bitch, says she wants free college for all!  How about closing down their foundation on November 8th and taking all of the cash they have collected since they are giving to get favors from the never to be President and using the funds to pay for college to those in their 2nd year and beyond if they maintain a "B" average.  This would actually make their lovely daughter try and get another job that would pay her $900,000 a year!
Example Output: Obscene

Example Input: Comment: O'Leary isn't quite as obnoxious as Trump...it remains to be seen if that's even possible...and he isn't as far right, especially on social issues, regarding which he seems reasonably progressive.  But he did offer a bribe to a democratically elected Premier to resign, and he clearly has no understanding of governance. He referred to the present P.M. as "surfer boy", and says the 2019 election will be an "exorcism", which reminds me of the "lock her up" nonsense of the Trump campaign.  That's the kind of stuff we might expect from online trolls and 12 year olds, and we got sick of it with Harper and all the "nice hair" ads.  We need an adult with some degree of gravitas to lead the CPC, not O'Leary.
Example Output:
Non-obscene