We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Input: Consider Input: After all, absence of brain activity is considered legally dead in the medical field, so the start of brain activity should be the requirement for them to be legally alive.

Output: Invalid


Input: Consider Input: The only problem is that some human has to build and program it.

Output: Invalid


Input: Consider Input: 1) Virginia: How the death penalty will save money over life without parole (LWOP).


Output: Valid