We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Example Input: Sent1: i think the death penalty should be abolished because some people are sentenced to deathfor a crime they might have not committed.
 Sent2: Most people deranged enough to commit crimes worthy of the death penalty feel no remorse for what they have done.
Example Output: Not similar

Example Input: Sent1: But killing someone because of him killing someone is quite hypocritical.
 Sent2: First it is more expensive to kill a person, then letting him stay for a life long imprisonment.
Example Output: Not similar

Example Input: Sent1: Statistics show that capital punishment is no more of a deterrent than life without parole so I fail to see your arguement about society needing capital punishment.
 Sent2: The death penalty again has not only shown but proved to deter murder so therefore i wpuld suggest you reconsider your closing arguments.
Example Output:
Similar