In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: insult and non-insult. Insult is any lanugage or act that is disrespectful or scornfully abusive.

[EX Q]: Comment: In my opinion, do you mean the Charter of Responsibilities of a Citizen? Oh, I forgot, we don't have such a thing....darn....
[EX A]: Non-insult

[EX Q]: Comment: Good point, any theocratic philosophy is a threat to constitutional democracy. Canada had a  blasphemy law. 

Violent theocrats are much worse - regardless of their religion. 

I only meant to say that The Premier was probably referring to violent Muslim theocrats which is essentially what an Islamist is. But the term is too close to Islamic and ends up stereotyping the religion. 

Given that the Ottoman empire ended just 100 years ago,  the link to religious rule is more recent in Islam. About the same time the Federal Reserve was created in America and they are still fighting about that!
[EX A]: Non-insult

[EX Q]: Comment: That's right, Palin will say anything and do anything that'll keep feeding her abusive Sarah PAC.  I don't know why the feds allow Palin to skip around the country, raising money and she's never going to be a serious candidate in any future elections.  It's time to gut the Sarah PAC and shut 'er down for good riddance.
[EX A]:
Non-insult