TASK DEFINITION: In this task, you're given a statement, and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence clearly disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3' corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.
PROBLEM: Statement: It is sufficient to note, however, that Stevenson was content to rely on a mix of his own admitted bloodthirstiness and good old-fashioned prejudice for his conclusion. Choices:  1. Stevenson relied on his thirst for blood and prejudice.  2. Stevenson was just and relied on the truth. 3. Stevenson will do anything to get ahead. 

SOLUTION: 2

PROBLEM: Statement: The interim final rule was determined to be a significant regulatory action by OMB under Executive Order Choices:  1. One regulatory action used by the OMB was the interim final rule. 2. The interim final rule was a regulatory action of little significance. 3. OMB frequently used Executive Orders as regulatory actions.

SOLUTION: 2

PROBLEM: Statement: there's a uh a couple called um oh i'm going to forgot his name now uh Dirkson Choices:  1. His partner has the same name 2. I can't remember their name 3. His name is Robertson

SOLUTION:
3