In this task, you will be presented with a context from an academic paper and a question separated with a 
. You have to answer the question based on the context.

[Q]: We introduce our proposed diversity, density, and homogeneity metrics with their detailed formulations and key intuitions. 
 Question: Did they propose other metrics?
[A]: Yes


[Q]: Mathur et al. in their paper for detecting offensive tweets proposed a Ternary Trans-CNN model where they train a model architecture comprising of 3 layers of Convolution 1D having filter sizes of 15, 12 and 10 and kernel size of 3 followed by 2 dense fully connected layer of size 64 and 3. The first dense FC layer has ReLU activation while the last Dense layer had Softmax activation. They were able to train this network on a parallel English dataset provided by Davidson et al. The authors were able to achieve Accuracy of 83.9%, Precision of 80.2%, Recall of 69.8%.

The approach looked promising given that the dataset was merely 3189 sentences divided into three categories and thus we replicated the experiment but failed to replicate the results. The results were poor than what the original authors achieved. But, most of the model hyper-parameter choices where inspired from this work. 
 Question: What is the previous work's model?
[A]: Ternary Trans-CNN


[Q]: The second trend is that by using less than 50% of the data available the model tends to overfit the data, as indicated by the consistent increase in the validation loss after about 15 epochs (check dashed lines in right side of Figure FIGREF28 ). 
 Question: What experimental results suggest that using less than 50% of the available training examples might result in overfitting?
[A]:
consistent increase in the validation loss after about 15 epochs