We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

[Q]: Sent1: First, we must choose to use executions because they may save innocent life.
 Sent2: People use the argument that we should not execute people based on the possibility that they may be innocent, but they could care less if we lock someone up for life who may be innocent.
[A]: Not similar


[Q]: Sent1: How many people with a life sentence without parole have died an prison and been innocent?
 Sent2: while it is a fact that innocent people have been placed and convicted to death row condemned to die, there are however people who are guilty and should die.
[A]: Not similar


[Q]: Sent1: The death penalty doesn't need to become more equalized.
 Sent2: There are some who need to be put to death.
[A]:
Not similar