In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

[Q]: Comment: "Damn that 1st Amendment!" ...

-- the FEC --
[A]: Obscene


[Q]: Comment: The best one yet.  As a former Alaskan of 25 years I carry a deep affection for the Great Land.  Now a resident of North Idaho, imagine my surprise when I ran into a film crew on Lake Pend O'Reille filming for History channels, "Missing in Alaska".  I was told that this was now Lake Illiamna and they would be filming on a public landing and could I stay out of the camera view.  Evidently there is not much HISTORY (or ethics) to the History channel or someone at History needs to check their GPS location before setting up the film crew.  Reality my ass.
[A]: Obscene


[Q]: Comment: C'mon G&M let's cut to the chase. The guy is a liar, plain and simple and he is a hypocrite of the highest order. You've been far too kind here because he really hasn't accomplished much for the country except to divide it along geographic and economic lines. And now he's waffling and backsliding on Bill 62. It's all about the retail politics for Trudeau. His insincerity is astounding and this past week revealed him to be the true Laurentian elite that he is. You need to be far more scrupulous going forward and put him under a microscope as we lead into the next election. This tap dancing around issues and lobbing softballs must come to an end of your paper is to be taken seriously.
[A]:
Non-obscene