In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.
--------
Question: Sentence: Bob paid for Charlie's college education. He is very generous.
 Reason: The 'He' refers to bob because Bob is the main character and Charlie is the main antagonist. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

Answer: Wrong


Question: Sentence: I saw Jim yelling at some guy in a military uniform with a huge red  beard. I don't know who he was, but he looked very unhappy.
 Reason: The 'he' refers to the guy in uniform because it is a common practice at military bases to have a guy in a uniform shout at people. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

Answer: Wrong


Question: Sentence: Paul tried to call George on the phone, but he wasn't successful.
 Reason: The 'he' refers to paul because the call was made by Paul. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

Answer:
Correct