In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

[EX Q]: Comment: Sullivan, Koch  griffin, Evans do we need to say more. Sullivan Figure it out you left us with a huge deficit , unfinished projects and terrible labor relations. You used Ernie Hall to attack labor. You are using Griffin now. You sir are definitely NOT you dad! Take your golden spoon and close mouth around it and please stay out of our business, You had your chance and you blew it.
[EX A]: Non-identity-attack

[EX Q]: Comment: "the men"? You mean the bishops? Prove they don't love homosexuals. Prove it. Homosexual activity is evil. Its simple. All people are to be loved, not used as objects. Homosexual activity uses another person as an object to masturbate with.  Not so nice!
[EX A]: Identity-attack

[EX Q]: Comment: But federal government funded and controlled healthcare is currently about 67% of national healthcare, leaving private insurance at about 33%. So how will wringing "ridiculous deductibles and premiums to the for-profit insurance companies" of a small percent of national healthcare result in enough funding for Medicare-for-all. The math doesn't add up unless income and payroll taxes are increased significantly.

And remember not all private insurance is for profit, Kaiser-Permante and other private providers are non-profit.
[EX A]:
Non-identity-attack