Based on the given context, craft a common-sense question, especially those that are LONG, INTERESTING, and COMPLEX. The goal is to write questions that are easy for humans and hard for AI machines! To create such questions, here are some suggestions: A. What may (or may not) be the plausible reason for an event? B. What may (or may not) happen before (or after, or during) an event? C. What may (or may not) be a plausible fact about someone (or something)? D. What may (or may not) happen if an event happens (or did not happen)? You can also create other types of questions. DO NOT make your question answerable without looking at the context, or question of which the correct answer can be directly extracted from the context. DO NOT ask a question that requires very specialized knowledge that is not common sense. DO NOT ask too simple or too short questions. Your question must be related to the context and answerable with common sense. Try to add more variations and complexity to the questions.

Context: The day is overcast and dreary ; indeed it feels fitting -- as if it weeps with us . Late last week we finally determined that our sweet foundling stray of 3 years this month had lymphoma and a mass in her stomach . She had been spiraling down sharply for the past 4 - 6 weeks despite all our efforts and the fine people at the clinic we go to .
What disease has our stray been diagnosed with ?

Context: As one can see on the frequent updates on this blog I do n't have much to say , now there 's this twitter thing , until recently I did n't understand it . Whenever I visit the site I see mostly pointless ( imo ) stuff like " preparing my pizza " , " eating my pizza " , " done with my pizza " . The other thing I see there are people telling me what errors in their applications they are currently fixing . I ca n't see why that 's interesting .
What is the theme of the narrator 's blog ?

Context: So I went and saw that movie Cloverfield . It was actually really effing good . Had some problems , admittedly . The monster 's size was n't as clear as I 'd liked , the narrative was a little hard to follow time line - wise due to the frequent use of jump cuts over undisclosed periods of time , and the camera work ( although realistic and adding to the mood of the film ) got really annoying after a while . Otherwise , a quite good film .

How could the movie have been better for him ?