TASK DEFINITION: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: insult and non-insult. Insult is any lanugage or act that is disrespectful or scornfully abusive.
PROBLEM: Comment: She is such an idiot. Pick a stupid behavior--especially one that popular among the uniformed majority--and she's immediately grasping at coat ails. Anything to try and stay relevant.

SOLUTION: Insult

PROBLEM: Comment: If I declare that I am a vegetarian even though I eat bacon for breakfast chicken for lunch and beef for dinner I would be appropriately labeled a lunatic.  If I declare that I am a woman even though I have a penis you would be liable for denying my constitutional rights if you disagree with me.  What's wrong with this scenario?

SOLUTION: Non-insult

PROBLEM: Comment: "But that's how we've always done it."
I still think it's wrong.
How "informed" did the congregants become?
"Don't vote for her, she's beholden to Demon Rum and is an Episcopalian!"
"He attends communion every week and always donates generously to St. Peter's Pence Collection!"
"She gives to Israel, of course we want her!"
"He consorts with known homosexuals! Do we want a sinner in the statehouse?"
That's being "informed" alright.

SOLUTION:
Non-insult