We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.
--------
Question: 35) Private citizens don't need a gun for self-protection because the police are there to protect them even though the Supreme Court says the police are not responsible for their protection.

Answer: Valid


Question: However, if you carry into California then you are restricted by ���the same conditions or limitations that apply to residents of that state.���

Answer: Valid


Question: with regard to the fact that most gun crime is from illegl guns, in that case why not make all guns illegal.

Answer:
Valid