In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

Comment: I guess Terry Frei's little racist twitter rant against Sato doesn't get reported at the Denver Post, eh? His "apology," and plug for his book,was even more lame. He needs to apologize to Takuma Sato through his column and he needs to publicly address his issues in the paper. Frankly, if I were his editor, he would have been summarily fired by now. So, you are going to monitor whether or not my complaint about his racist tweet is civil? LOL
Non-identity-attack

Comment: This Hitler argument is stale...arming people with military style weapons not only supports the crazy, it reflects our inability to understand why the vast majority of police favor the reasonable regulation of firearms ownership. They would also like to see regulation ammunition that's relates to the ability to kill them regulated. None of this minimal regulation would limit your freedoms...Canada has resonance gun regulations, Australia bans a number of styles of weaponry...they they both seem okay. The difference? Fewer gun deaths, fewer crazies with arms, and a clearer commitment to community safety. It's your children, our police, the neighbor down the street that desires reasonable consideration.
Non-identity-attack

Comment: Yeah, 1 .38 pistol wielded by one woman against massive military arms and armored vests and helmeted face shields and armored vehicles.  Sticks?  Rocks?  Everyone can view the videos online to dispel your bald-faced lies and unintelligent logic.  Just how stupid can you be?

Non-identity-attack