Given a paragraph about movies and a set of conversational questions and answers about the paragraph, say whether the passage contains sufficient information to answer the follow-up question. Say Yes if it is answerable; otherwise, say No. The paragraph has the prefix 'CONTEXT:'. Each conversation question has a prefix `Q:` followed by the answer prefix `A:`, and the follow-up question has a prefix `FOLLOWUP_Q:`.

Ex Input:
CONTEXT: For the same reason that Jeff doesn't immediately call the police with his suspicions: fear that if Thorwald realizes he has been made by an outside observer, he will dispose of all the evidence and escape without prosecution... Lisa is buying more time by being taken under arrest, and the event was intended to appease Thorwald to some extent. He was already making mistakes (retaining his wife's wedding ring due to sentimentality), and Lisa was clinging onto the thought that their plan was not yet foiled. The arrest itself was actually a means of getting Lisa safely out of the apartment, and of getting the wedding ring (as evidence) into the hands of the police.  <sep>  Q: Why didn't Lisa tell the truth about Thorwald to the police? A: For the same reason that Jeff doesn't immediately call the police with his suspicions  Q: Why does she get herself arrested? A: Lisa is buying more time by being taken under arrest  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Who pays Lisa?

Ex Output:
No


Ex Input:
CONTEXT: I believe the moral of the story is "Don't judge book by its cover". The whole movie is against stereotypes. The bunny should be a carrot farmer, because that's what bunnies do, the predators are bullies an deep down everyone feels that way, because when assumption is made that only predators are going feral, everyone accepts it as truth. You can see that even the fox is bullied for being a predator because he is perceived as one.  <sep>  Q: What is the moral of Zootopia? A: I believe the moral of the story is "Don't judge book by its cover  Q: Is the story about taking risks? A: The whole movie is against stereotypes  Q: What is the relevance of the bunny in the film. A: The bunny should be a carrot farmer, because that's what bunnies do, the predators are bullies an deep down everyone feels that way  Q: What is the relevance of the predators? A: You can see that even the fox is bullied for being a predator because he is perceived as one  Q: isn't the moral about trying everything in life? A: I believe the moral of the story is "Don't judge book by its cover  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Is there anything else that's relevant from the film?

Ex Output:
No


Ex Input:
CONTEXT: Ben could've escaped whenever he wanted, he wanted to ensure that Dan sees him off in the train to Yuma, The reason being he wants Dan to succeed in his endeavor because of the promise he made to his son and his wife and also he sympathizes with Dan on the fact that he used to be a soldier and his life changed after he sustained the injury in the war and wanted to give him the fulfillment of sending the notorious criminal to the jail. So when Charlie kills him against his orders Ben gets angry on that issue and he no longer cares for the group and he kills them all and goes in the train simply to fulfill Dan once again and once the train departs he flees on his horse.  <sep>  Q: do you think he chose to help him out of guilt? A: he sympathizes with Dan on the fact that he used to be a soldier and his life changed after he sustained the injury in the war  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: that sounds about tight, so you think even mass murderers can change?

Ex Output:

No