Craft one correct answer to the question given in input. To make it more interesting, try to use non-stereotypical language if possible. Make sure your correct answer is reasonably long, consistent with the context, and requires common sense (instead of explicit extraction from the context.) In your answer, use as few words as possible from the given context. Use a response that is uncommon/non-stereotypical, so that it is less predictable. To be less repetitive, please vary your language for each question.

Example Input: Context: Then last night ( sunday ) i was out at Green Pastures . I ' ve wanted to go since it opened just to see what it was like . I must say that the worship was amazing , the singing was incredible , you could really feel the Spirit of God in that place . 
Question: What will the person likely do afterwards ?
Example Output: Return to the service.

Example Input: Context: I ' m enrolling at Leeds College Of Music this week . On Wednesday I traveled up and was just there for an hour . Today I was there for half an hour . 
Question: Where is the narrator likely to be next week ?
Example Output: They will be at Leeds College .

Example Input: Context: It 's well worth the effort however , as ' Pan Tadeusz ' is a richly rewarding read . The translation I read was by Kenneth R. Mackenie , which was the first to maintain the metre and rhyming couplets of the original throughout its 10,000 lines . Obviously there must have been some compromises made to achieve that , and there is the occasional rhyme that grated , but overall the poem reads as if it was written in English . Without wanting to give the ending away , it is the various characters love of their country and determination to liberate themselves from Russian rule that overrides all other thoughts . 
Question: What was the main subject of the book ?
Example Output:
Love of country and determination to be free of communist control .