Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.

[Q]: If my dog was an asshole, and I knew they acted aggressively to strangers and I still let them out in my front yard without obvious restraints and someone shot them, then no, I wouldn't be concerned. I would expect it.
[A]: Yes


[Q]: This mistake by Stewart goes to poor judgement and more attention to style than substance.  His speech made a valid point about helping people in appropriate ways where they live, but he just couldn't resist repeating the story about fires and disappearing pets (perhaps not even true).  I agree that Stewart is not qualified for any higher office, and possibly would not even be in the public eye if he were not part of one of the powerful families in the area.
[A]: No


[Q]: I agree with you that residents are very kept busy...MUPTES, City Hall, Kesey Square, Re-striping of many of our streets so that no longer flow, etc.   I have lived in Eugene
for many years and have never seen anything like this before or in any town or city
have ever lived in.

The current Eugene Weekly cover and other major articles in the RG and The Weekly continue to discuss these issues as well as the transparency issue.
[A]:
No