The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.

[EX Q]: Context: 'They sort of need more water for their meds' 'I'm sorry to hear that! But can you spare 1 for me since you probably don't need all the water.' 'Sure that sounds fair. Thank you. Besides water what do you need for your trip?'
Utterance: 'great. Then can you give 2 food instead? We eat a lot and need more to go through the night...'
[EX A]: Yes

[EX Q]: Context: 'Hey there - looks like we are both going camping!  I'm from the South so firewood and water are a high priority for me.' 'Wow, thats awesome! Yes, I am! Well, that's great because water isn't super important for me. Firewood is though. ' 'That sounds awesome - I'm sure we can come to an agreement on how to allocate that works for both of us.  '
Utterance: 'I agree that we will! I do love having food as well. Have lots of people coming.'
[EX A]: Yes

[EX Q]: Context: 'Hey buddy, yes I'm so pumped for it.' 'Okay so I'm planning this super cool backpacking expedition up the waterfall but I'm going to need all the additional water and food for everyone.' 'All of the additional water and food? That doesn't seem very fair. ☹️'
Utterance: 'Well I'll be splitting it with everyone on the trip as we go up. The people that choose to stay will still get all their basic supplies of food and water. The backpacking trip is going to take three days though, we're gonna need the resources😮'
[EX A]:
Yes