We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

[EX Q]: Sent1: The fact remains that life in prison is cheaper than sentencing one to the death penalty.
 Sent2: And no one said that life in prision is "much worse" then the death penalty.
[EX A]: Not similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: And that killer has help, he has the people that support the death penalty and will give him more appeals, and if found guilty he'll get an easy way out with death, he won't have to suffer.
 Sent2: No he the guy who killed twitter should have to suffer in jail and think about what he done for the rest of his life, and not be given the easy way out buy the death pentaly.
[EX A]: Not similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: Criminals need to be punished for what they have done.
 Sent2: My point was that there are ways of dealing with violent criminals, murderers even, without executing them.
[EX A]:
Not similar