In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

Q: Sentence: Madonna fired her trainer because she couldn't stand her boyfriend.
 Reason: The 'she' refers to madonna because MADONNA REFER TO HER TRAINER. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

A: Wrong
****
Q: Sentence: Pam's parents came home and found her having sex with her boyfriend, Paul. They were embarrassed about it.
 Reason: The 'They' refers to pam and paul because the two have been together for years. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

A: Wrong
****
Q: Sentence: Fred and Alice had very warm down coats, but they were not enough for the cold in Alaska.
 Reason: The 'they' refers to coats because the coats were expected to prevent the cold. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

A:
Correct
****