We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

[Q]: Well, I'd rather my money go towards a bullet for a child-rapist than his food, water, and room for the rest of his life.
[A]: Valid


[Q]: i am not saying that by having one is the only determinate of clearing a suspect, ex a person has the right not to incriminate themselves, i.e. they were robbing a bank.
[A]: Invalid


[Q]: well what do you suggest we do to someone who robs a bank?
[A]:
Invalid