In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine the neutral choice based on your inference from the statement and your commonsense knowledge. The neutral choice is a sentence that neither agrees nor disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3', corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence. If sentence X agrees with sentence Y, one's correctness follows from the other one. If sentence X disagrees with sentence Y, they can not be correct at the same time.
--------
Question: Statement: Why not just abolish all the laws that are supposed to protect These folk; because if you do not have legal services, the laws are unenforceable and useless. Choices: 1. These folk need legal services to protect them. 2. There is no way to enforce the laws with no legal services. 3. The people can protect themselves against the law.

Answer: 1


Question: Statement: in a briefing, prior to an in-depth study of the implementation of the Bail Reform Act of 1984. Choices: 1. The briefing was held on a Saturday in a cold function room at the Hilton Hotel.  2. There was no such briefing about the Bail Reform Act of 1984.  3. There was a briefing about the Bail Reform Act of 1984. 

Answer: 1


Question: Statement: And he was doing just fine until it was time to go to his second shift at 1-0 Computer Associates, where he had been working on a program for the management of empty space in staff lockers in telecommunications companies. Choices: 1. He was ordered to go to his second shift by his immediate supervisor. 2. He was doing decently until he had to go to his second shift. 3. He only had to go to one shift on any given day.

Answer:
1