We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

Example Input: The Second Amendment would be an inexplicable aberration if it were not read to protect individual rights as well.���
Example Output: Valid

Example Input: Could you legally produce weapons of mass destruction in your own back yard "without asking" for permission?
Example Output: Valid

Example Input: He claims that he's not, but his support of proposals that have the potential to make criminals out of innocent crime victims would suggest otherwise.
Example Output:
Valid