In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine the neutral choice based on your inference from the statement and your commonsense knowledge. The neutral choice is a sentence that neither agrees nor disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3', corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence. If sentence X agrees with sentence Y, one's correctness follows from the other one. If sentence X disagrees with sentence Y, they can not be correct at the same time.

Example Input: Statement: yeah course the ozone is up there so Choices: 1. The ozone is down there.  2. The ozone is up there and is disappearing.  3. The ozone is up there. 
Example Output: 2

Example Input: Statement: At first glance, reducing future benefits promised to current workers would not seem to increase resources available to invest now. Choices: 1. The reduction of future benefits includes healthcare insurance.  2. The reduction of future benefits for employees does not seem to make available investment opportunities.  3. Reducing future benefits for current workers results in more resources to invest with. 
Example Output: 1

Example Input: Statement: A kebapcy specializes in grilled meats, notably kebabs served with pide and salad, while a pideci or pide salonu is a Turkish-style pizza parlour, dishing up tasty pide (unleavened bread) topped with minced lamb, eggs, or cheese. Choices: 1. There is a single type of restaurant from Turkish origin. 2. A kebapcy and a pideci are different types of Turkish restaurants. 3. Kebapcy and pideci are easy to confuse.
Example Output:
3