Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.

Input: Consider Input: I will guarantee you more subjugated people died at the hands of Japanese soldiers in the name of Japanese imperialism than died in the bombings of Nagasaki and Hiroshima combined.  And they didn't die quickly like most of the atomic bombing casualties.  So many people like to talk about those bombings like they were the most horrific acts of WWII.  Not even close.  The war in the Pacific and on the Western front both pale in comparison to the scale and savagery with which the Germans and Russians fought each other on the Eastern front.  By most accounts 2 million soldiers and civilians died in the Battle of Stalingrad alone.

Output: Yes


Input: Consider Input: You're a lot of things, Dick, but I'm pretty sure lawbreaker isn't one of them.

These crimes are coming from the same small demographic involved in the same illicit activities. As long as you avoid association with scumbags, you have nothing to worry about.

Yes people will try to rob weed businesses. Just like they rob banks, coffee stands, and convenience stores. Criminals go where the money is. However, consider that banks, coffee stands, and convenience stores are not required to have the same security as cannabusinesses are. That's right, not even banks.

The sky's only falling inside your head.

Output: Yes


Input: Consider Input: I agree.  In this age of  computer data bases a person can no longer "start over" nor can we continue to view incarceration as the only option.    Also, I was intrigued by Coghill's statement that we are sending these young Alaskans to outside prisons where they become well educated in the criminal life style and bring those lessons back home.  My concern is that future legislatures cannot be bound to fund these programs that might reduce the  recidivism and we wind up worse off than we are now.


Output: No