We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

[Q]: Sent1: You are pulling the same XXXX Doc did in thinking that because I don't think more guns equals less crime that I automatically must think it means MORE crime and that gun control laws are effective and needed.
 Sent2: So I think gun control on the magnitude you want would effect it, how could it not?
[A]: Not similar


[Q]: Sent1: So if its cause people in high crime areas want to buy guns for protection then why do they only want protection against gun murders but not other crimes.
 Sent2: Guns don't kill people, if they did, they would go to jail for murder- not the murderers.
[A]: Not similar


[Q]: Sent1: And that assumes that gun control will have no effect on illegal firearm ownership.
 Sent2: The criminal homicides almost always include illegally gotten guns- so that's not relevant either as gun control laws won't change that.
[A]:
Similar