Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
--------
Question: Ranger, Again thanks for citing the law as it is intended to be a just and good law. "No Exclusive Right or special privilege of fishery shall be created or authorized in the natural waters of the State." Please read this first sentence of the law again Mr. Granger. Now we get to where the ex gov and buddies convoluted themselves rights to our fish. "This section does not restrict the power of the State to limit entry into any fishery for the purpose of resource conservation,..." This means the State can limit entry into a fishery for resource management meaning NO one can fish or ALL can fish. It is greedy and corrupt to out currant and future Alaskans. My great grand kids should be able to fish. And not have to pay or suck up to the owner of the fish that are really public domain.

Answer: Yes


Question: If you go here - http://raineugene.org/contact/  you can find my email.  Email me and I will send you contact information to the people involved in the projects that I have knowledge of (Innovation Hun and Fiber Project) so that you can get more detailed information on them.  I will also do my best to connect you to others that are working on plans for the others projects (Farmers Market and Park Blocks) to see what those are and get more detailed descriptions. 

On the larger discussion of robbing Perter to pay Paul, my opinion is that we are not, but that is a much longer conversation that would be difficult to have and is getting a little muddy in this thread.  There are several issues getting conflated that I think need to be separated (is the government trustworthy and are these projects worth doing).  I can talk to the latter, but would rather not debate the former.  I get it is an issue, it is just not one that I have a strong opinion about.

Answer: No


Question: We need to stop aiming our efforts at shadows.  Overdoses are the result of making possession of meth a crime.  European nations understand this mis-directed thinking.  They don't have the problem America has.  Drug use in America is an avoidance behavior - running from pain of discrimination, joblessness, poverty, mental illness and a host of other "inducements." The cost of incarceration is so high that even a tiny slice of those costs could transform our society's attitude toward mental health rather than cops "spanking" everybody in sight.  Abusive daddies never solved a problem.  They cause them.

Answer:
No