In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: insult and non-insult. Insult is any lanugage or act that is disrespectful or scornfully abusive.

Q: Comment: What is to stop the chief from selling native status to immigrants  if the price is right?

A: Non-insult
****
Q: Comment: It's been quiet these last few  weeks and people forgot all the bloodshed for Islam.  But now that this is over, let the trucks do their smashing and the bombers do their demolition.  The real war on France is only just beginning.

A: Non-insult
****
Q: Comment: Rogmard--

Do you think that modern warfare--meaning AT LEAST since the American  Civil War--is to be fought by the rules of medieval chivalry or those of the Marquis of Queensbury?  

OF COURSE "ATROCITIES" WERE COMMITTED BY ALL SIDES.  Not the least of which were the "nukings" of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Because human beings are just that--flawed human beings who want to SURVIVE.  And yes , wreak vengeance on those who slaughtered their comrades.

WHAT DID YOU EXPECT, NAIVE FOOL?

My guess is that you have no concrete proof as to how many lives were--or weren't--saved by the nuking of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.  Only wild-assed guesses based on "what-if?"  revisions  of history by demonstrably pacificistic "historians" with agendas like yours.

For my part, I'm glad that WWII ended with me speaking English instead of German or Japanese.

Your foolish idealism would seem to differ with my gratitude to men and women who fought a bitter, cruel war to the bitter end.  

Idiot.

A:
Insult
****