We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

Gun ownership is a recognized, constitutionally protected right, and it's not dependent on fulfilling some duty to the city, state or federal government.
Valid

It's quite obvious by this and as well as the SCOTUS decision that the right to keep and bear arms is not dependent on the militia part, but the other way around.
Valid

That's what you seem to be doing since enough information is not provided to draw any conclusions about the relationship between guns and crime.

Valid