In this task, you will be presented with a context from an academic paper and a question separated with a 
. You have to answer the question based on the context.

[Q]: Table TABREF14 show the results obtained for proposed s2sL approach in comparison to that of MLP for the tasks of Speech/Music and Neutral/Sad classification, by considering different proportions of training data. 
 Question: Which models/frameworks do they compare to?
[A]: MLP


[Q]: We show that by determining and integrating heterogeneous set of features from different modalities – aesthetic features from posted images (colorfulness, hue variance, sharpness, brightness, blurriness, naturalness), choice of profile picture (for gender, age, and facial expression), the screen name, the language features from both textual content and profile's description (n-gram, emotion, sentiment), and finally sociability from ego-network, and user engagement – we can reliably detect likely depressed individuals in a data set of 8,770 human-annotated Twitter users. 
 Question: What is the source of the textual data? 
[A]: Users' tweets


[Q]: As Garimella et al. BIBREF23 have made their code public , we reproduced their best method Randomwalk on our datasets and measured the AUC ROC, obtaining a score of 0.935. An interesting finding was that their method had a poor performance over their own datasets. This was due to the fact (already explained in Section SECREF4) that it was not possible to retrieve the complete discussions, moreover, in no case could we restore more than 50% of the tweets. So we decided to remove these discussions and measure again the AUC ROC of this method, obtaining a 0.99 value. Our hypothesis is that the performance of that method was seriously hurt by the incompleteness of the data. We also tested our method on these datasets, obtaining a 0.99 AUC ROC with Walktrap and 0.989 with Louvain clustering. 
 Question: What are the state of the art measures?
[A]:
Randomwalk Walktrap Louvain clustering