In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Comment: And the Quran does not include female genital mutilation.  Are you also opposed to male genital mutilation?  Jesus underwent it.  It was ordered by God.  It's in the Bible.
So, all Muslims have the same culture, because they are Muslims.  Therefore, all Christians engage in genocidal war and militarized rape (as was done by christian Croats and Serbs in the 1990s).   All Christians have a culture of protesting at military funerals (a practice one group of christians engages in).  After all, they all agree on the Bible, so what one group does somewhere on the planet, all Christian cultures endorse.
Surely you are aware "culture" and religion aren't the same thing.  Or do you actually believe all muslims engage in female genital mutilation?
Sexual-explicit

Comment: More crap by leftists who only want their "approved" opinions aired.  All others are of course racists and bigots and hate speech.  Not how this country works sweetie.  And by the way, it wasn't a girl the article was about - a girl has a vagina - not a penis and testicles.  Maybe you need to educate yourself a bit more.
Sexual-explicit

Comment: diverdave, You're talking about "local jailers" and local governments as an example of nullification.  That's another alternative fact.  Only state governments can even try to employ the concept of nullification.    The alternative facts are piling up around you.  Watch out.  You might get buried by them.

Non-sexual-explicit