Categorize the comment on the basis of severe toxicity. If the comment is severely toxic output Yes, otherwise output No.
--------
Question: This nice map clearly suggests an alternative and equally defensible headline: Voters West of I5 Are Warier of School Bonds Than Eastsiders.

The PPS Board needs to understand, as well as those blue PPS neighborhoods, that placing another bond on the Nov. 2016 ballot will put those who support it in DIRECT OPPOSITION to Portland's city commissioners who have declared a "housing crisis."

Increasing property taxes, as a bond would do, is anathema to increasing housing affordability. City commissioners and candidates for city council must vigorously oppose any PPS bond issue or be required to appear in public with very large signs around their necks saying, "hypocrite."

Answer: No


Question: the color of the sāla flowers reveals the truth that the prosperous must decline

Answer: No


Question: We can agree it's greed, but I think it's greed on the consumers part.  People go to Walmart for only one reason, low prices.  If Walmart raised their price people would go somewhere else.  Same with gas stations, most are franchises and make next to nothing, but the average consumer will go some place else if the price of gas is $.01/gallon difference.  The American consumer could care less what employers are paying as long as they don't have to pay anymore and instead they blame the big bad companies.  Most of us in the middle of our career have a retirement, and that retirement is invented in these same companies, when was the last time you switched out of a 401K fund because they owned a company with low labor costs.

Answer:
No