TASK DEFINITION: Categorize the comment on the basis of obscenity. If the comment is obscene output Yes, otherwise output No.
PROBLEM: That is not true, why are you lying?

SOLUTION: No

PROBLEM: I have a lot of experience with GOP family and co-workers. I can even bring up an idea or a proposal, and they may be for or against it on the basis of the information involved. Once I tell them the GOP supported or was against it, they strangely go against their initial assessment, and fall in line with the GOP party line. Ledbetter Act, allowing women to sue for pay discrimination based on gender, not 180 days from the 1st offending paycheck(like SCOTUS decided), but 180 days from the time the woman first learned of the discriminatory lower pay. My conservative relatives liked that, and thought it fair--until they found out the GOP opposed it. Then they were firmly against it. Wiretapping under Bush? Not a problem! Same program under Obama? Invasion of their privacy! I see the lockstep attitude much more in the GOP ranks. Sure, some exist in Dem ranks, but it is far more prevalent in my experience with GOP voters.

SOLUTION: No

PROBLEM: I agree, "You cannot reason with people void of intelligence, logic, and reason."  
That's why I choose not to "answer my (your) questions", as you insist. When you don't get your way, you remind me of a conflicted Art Robinson with a rusty switchblade, ready to defeat "them", whoever they may be.

Meanwhile..."Since 1989, the McKenzie River Trust has acquired or won voluntary conservation easements to protect more than 4,500 acres of rivers, farms and forests..."

SOLUTION:
No