Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.

Example Input: Of course the author ignores the mcdowell decision<1989> which proclaimed any rural priority as illegal under state constitution. They want disciminatory rules which give them the right to shoot whatever they want whenever they want. And everybody else gets to stay out. What a load of unequal protection crap.
Example Output: Yes

Example Input: So there we have it.  
It's the position of the industry, (advocated by their sock-puppets in the legislature) that AK's fiscal needs are a threat to their tax gift.  Thank you Rebecca, for making it so very clear.

Strip funding for all govt service, however necessary, so that the industry can extract AK's resource wealth, for their benefit alone.  And our crooked, bought off legislature obediently goes along.  Counter to AK's constitution, and the oath they've sworn, to uphold the same.
Example Output: No

Example Input: ADP Bernie folks, slow your roll, within 48 hours of Hillary getting the official nod, you will ALL do just like the GOP, develop a sudden case of retrograde amnesia and tell everyone that will listen that you always supported the party candidate. Stop wasting time and accept it.
Example Output:
No