We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

[Q]: If there was even a modicum of truth to their insane, illogical beliefs on gun ownership, wouldn���t they have numerous examples of violent outbreaks to point to in all the states that allow people to carry concealed handguns?
[A]: Valid


[Q]: Cornell is right when he suggests that an individual right theory was discussed, because that point was conceded and no one disputed that the black men who suffered under Cruikshank���s actions had an individual RKBA.
[A]: Valid


[Q]: This is why I advocate explaining the costs of guns as much as possible, and fighting the gun lobby at every turn.
[A]:
Valid