We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gay Marriage) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gay marriage. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gay marriage.

Example Input: Or disagreeing that gays should be able to redefine marriage (while still being for them getting couples' benefits).
Example Output: Valid

Example Input: Specifically if the case can be made using the framer's actual words, and not just the scholars' presentation.
Example Output: Invalid

Example Input: Let me further expound on this, An important legal principle called the Conflict of Laws, allows states or nations that have a strong public policy exception to the laws of another state or nation, to enforce their own principles.
Example Output:
Valid