In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Comment: RadirD, Kim Jung Un and the DPRK regime threaten us all the time.  Why would Trump or any other rational person use that as a line in the sand?  It took them a few hours after his asinine statement to threaten us yet again.  Foolish.

The only person who yells out "I'm going to punch you in the face!" is a coward who doesn't actually want a fistfight (like Kim Jong Un).  A serious person would just slam you in the kisser without warning.

Don't get me wrong, the DPRK is a growing and serious threat and there may not be a way out of a conflict at this point.  They have been seriously mishandled and underestimated by every president (both GOP and Dems) since the Korean war.
Non-sexual-explicit

Comment: My original post to which you responded, was in the context of revolution. Did you miss that?
It seems to me that you're filling in some blanks with fantasy. I have no intention of starting a civil war, a revolution, of invading anyone's home, or killing someone because his or her political points of view differ from mine. In the light of recent events, it seems that it's more likely progressives who kill their ideological adversaries.
However, should there be a civil war between progressives and conservatives, I'd be supporting the conservatives in all ways of which I'm capable. I sincerely hope it never comes to that.
To be really clear, I do consider progressivism to be a social/political cancer that if allowed to grow will eventually kill the host.
Non-sexual-explicit

Comment: It seems strange that Chaput, the first ever 'Native American' Roman Catholic Archbishop, has not rooted his comments in his ancestral memory, history and experience. One might expect that he would be a foremost champion of the poor and a willing ally of Pope Francis, given the genocidal history that white western 'Christian' 'civilization' subjected Americas First Nations (North, Central and South) to. Instead, he comes across as a clumsy apologist for the Trump administration. What a strange title for someone who is not 'a stranger in a strange land'. His book, if like his sermons, must be full of intellectual masturbation and devoid of the earthy and humane wisdom of those from whom he is a descendant.

Sexual-explicit