In this task, you're given a statement, and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence clearly disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3' corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.

[EX Q]: Statement: An attorney representing a client before judge and jury was no longer the norm of a case when delivering critical legal services to low-income individuals. Choices:  1. Attorneys representing low-income individuals are the norm. 2. The norm of the case was violated when the attorney delivered their services. 3. Low-income individuals are often targeted by the justice system because of their inability to finance their legal battles.
[EX A]: 1

[EX Q]: Statement: It's no good arguing about how it was done. Choices:  1. There's no point in arguing about the logistics. 2. It'd be better for us to argue about how it was done. 3. Arguing is going to waste too much time and we need a solution right now.
[EX A]: 2

[EX Q]: Statement: you know that Choices:  1. I know this. 2. I don't know that. 3. That's something which you know. 
[EX A]:
2