TASK DEFINITION: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.
PROBLEM: Comment: The Calgary coach should buy one of those oversized foam rubber bats, and give a good simulated thrashing to the morons taking all those penalties.  It might embarrass them to stop the stupidity, spending 1/4 of the game in the box.   Dreadful!!

SOLUTION: Non-identity-attack

PROBLEM: Comment: This Hitler argument is stale...arming people with military style weapons not only supports the crazy, it reflects our inability to understand why the vast majority of police favor the reasonable regulation of firearms ownership. They would also like to see regulation ammunition that's relates to the ability to kill them regulated. None of this minimal regulation would limit your freedoms...Canada has resonance gun regulations, Australia bans a number of styles of weaponry...they they both seem okay. The difference? Fewer gun deaths, fewer crazies with arms, and a clearer commitment to community safety. It's your children, our police, the neighbor down the street that desires reasonable consideration.

SOLUTION: Non-identity-attack

PROBLEM: Comment: Oh dear, I've just shot myself in the foot.  How did that happen? 
The  Mexican plant pays $3/hour, the Canadian $32/hour  plus benefits but  the Canadian workers are still not satisfied so go on strike?  The Union blames Nafta.  Words fail me.

SOLUTION:
Non-identity-attack