In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Q: Comment: Trid sees nothing wrong with "No Dogs or Jews", "We don't serve Muslims" and so on. He supports bigotry. And no, that is NOT a straw man, but the clear and obvious implication of your " If either the buyer or the seller does not want to enter into that contract for whatever reason then I believe they have the right to refuse." Thank you for proving that your claim to being a Christian is a complete sham.

A: Non-sexual-explicit
****
Q: Comment: There is no question that a poll of "Teen Vogue" readers would come up with an answer for the hints "Justin" and "Canada" in a survey.....

A: Non-sexual-explicit
****
Q: Comment: They had no evidence of wrong doing and they all covered for each other .now it's I will talk to try to save my own ass .

A:
Sexual-explicit
****