In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

[EX Q]: Comment: "It does seem a little hypocritical for Dogwood to be complaining about Kinder Morgan playing a role in the B.C. election through its donations to the BC Liberals, when it is receiving money from the United States to fight for causes aligned with interests there. "
In one case, foreign interests donate money to advocacy groups.
In the other, foreign interests donate money to a political party whose members currently form the provincial government. 
Not even remotely equivalent, Gary, and tf. hardly hypocritical of Dogwood to complain about it.
[EX A]: Non-obscene

[EX Q]: Comment: "invaded and pushed out and have your culture changed by those different from you"

Followed by: "That said, we all are citizens of Planet Earth and we need to have some tolerance."

Invaded? Really? Did they come with guns and force you out of your homes? Did they prevent you from practicing your chosen religion?

You were NOT invaded and holy shit maybe reread your last line.
[EX A]: Obscene

[EX Q]: Comment: You have to be a special kind of stupid to fall for this crap. People still fall for the 419 scam as well.
[EX A]:
Obscene