We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Q: Sent1: One way that would make me happy with the death penalty is if the person was killed in the same way as the person that they murdered.
 Sent2: I do not think that a government should be unable to kill someone, simply that they almost always should not.

A: Not similar
****
Q: Sent1: You need to find lots more for the death penalty to save more lives than innocents that have been executed by it.
 Sent2: There has been so much cases of people who have been executed, only to be found innocent after their death.

A: Not similar
****
Q: Sent1: From what I have read, there has been no conclusive evidence of an innocent person killed by the death penalty since 1900.
 Sent2: There is, in fact, no proof that an innocent has been executed since 1900.

A:
Similar
****