In this task, you will be presented with a context from an academic paper and a question separated with a 
. You have to answer the question based on the context.

Ex Input:
What is the impact of pre-trained representations with less transcribed data? In order to get a better understanding of this, we train acoustic models with different amounts of labeled training data and measure accuracy with and without pre-trained representations (log-mel filterbanks). The pre-trained representations are trained on the full Librispeech corpus and we measure accuracy in terms of WER when decoding with a 4-gram language model. Figure shows that pre-training reduces WER by 32% on nov93dev when only about eight hours of transcribed data is available. Pre-training only on the audio data of WSJ ( WSJ) performs worse compared to the much larger Librispeech ( Libri). This further confirms that pre-training on more data is crucial to good performance. 
 Question: Do they explore how much traning data is needed for which magnitude of improvement for WER? 

Ex Output:
Yes


Ex Input:
In our experiments we use the same data-sets from other works BIBREF32, BIBREF23, BIBREF33 as well as other datasets that we collected by us using a similar criterion (described in Section SECREF4). We use thirty different discussions that took place between March 2015 and June 2019, half of them with controversy and half without it. We considered discussions in four different languages: English, Portuguese, Spanish and French, occurring in five regions over the world: South and North America, Western Europe, Central and Southern Asia. We also studied these discussions taking first 140 characters and then 280 from each tweet to analyze the difference in performance and computing time wrt the length of the posts. 
 Question: What datasets did they use?

Ex Output:
BIBREF32, BIBREF23, BIBREF33 discussions in four different languages: English, Portuguese, Spanish and French, occurring in five regions over the world: South and North America, Western Europe, Central and Southern Asia. 


Ex Input:
As can be seen, the proposed DSC loss outperforms the best baseline results by a large margin, i.e., outperforming BERT-tagger by +1.86 in terms of F1 score on CTB5, +1.80 on CTB6 and +2.19 on UD1.4. 
 Question: What are method's improvements of F1 w.r.t. baseline BERT tagger for Chinese POS datasets?

Ex Output:

+1.86 in terms of F1 score on CTB5 +1.80 on CTB6 +2.19 on UD1.4