In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Q: Comment: Right Steve, because the McGuinty, Butts, Wynne's "green" plan is paying off in spades... the Ontario Liberals are a national embarrassment, they have no credibility and their "green" plan has turned out to be an absolute failure. Canadians who actually work for a living understand this, the smug limousine liberals who will be protected by fat golden pensions couldn't care less about rising costs of living and weaker economic competitiveness, it's not going to have any material impact on Wynne's ability to sip daiquiris in Cabo. This new tax will hurt working Canadians with higher living expenses and less economic opportunity.Trudeau operates with a smug sense of unearned entitlement, he lives in a cushioned dream of puff and ignorance. Butts sewered Ontario and now he wants to double down with the same incompetent policies on the rest of Canada.

A: Non-sexual-explicit
****
Q: Comment: And the suspect cooed "Ah,was Sex great or what"!

A: Sexual-explicit
****
Q: Comment: IRT Waoanaka:  That was a post of  mind numbing ignorance, the kind that gets innocents killed.  Tolerance is the primary reason these attacks occur.  The perp may have been a UK citizen but he's as Arab Muslim as can be.  The Euro's have been busy being "tolerant" and letting people from terrorist havens into their countries for decades and sadly this is the end result too many times.   You and Doug Chin separated at birth maybe?

A:
Non-sexual-explicit
****