TASK DEFINITION: We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.
PROBLEM: Sent1: So somebody try and tell us, that with stuff like this going on, that America still needs to overhaul its gun laws to bring them more in line with those of Mexico.
 Sent2: If a person does not want to own or carry a gun then so be it, and if an individual does own guns then like wise.

SOLUTION: Not similar

PROBLEM: Sent1: It dealt with an individual right and further indentified the limits of that right to be certain that the RKBA provision would not be construed to protect the carrying of concealed weapons.
 Sent2: Well, owning handguns for personal home protection is different that carrying guns in a concealed fashion for protection.

SOLUTION: Not similar

PROBLEM: Sent1: DC's highest gun deaths per capita coincidences with the fact that guns are legal there, doesn't mean anywhere guns are legal crime rates will be high.
 Sent2: In most studies legal purchases of firearms have no influence on the crime rate.

SOLUTION:
Not similar