TASK DEFINITION: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.
PROBLEM: Comment: My remarks must be quite effective or there wouldn't be so many people falling over each other to try to refute them.  If they were so crass and crazy to not matter a hill of beans or as Mr. Clark has claimed, counterproductive to my cause, the smart thing to do would be to let them go and self-destruct on their own.  Mr. Clark and Mr. Kelley simply cannot not answer no matter how far I go.  I must be hitting the mark somewhere.

SOLUTION: Non-sexual-explicit

PROBLEM: Comment: His skill at foreign affairs is off to a very bad start.  Confucius say "he who blabs with big ego get big kick in ass".

SOLUTION: Sexual-explicit

PROBLEM: Comment: You are such a negative jerk, Kizla. Millsap is universally rated as one of the top 6 or so free agents, including such names as Durant and Curry. But in your negative world, the Nuggets are simply trying to save face by signing one of the premier players on the market, a player that happens to fit one of their key needs. On 6/24, you wrote another critical (as always) column, "Why should Chris Paul and Paul Millsap take the Nuggets seriously as a free agent destination?" Now one of them apparently is doing exactly that, and of course you, Mr. Kizla, turn that into a negative as well. Whatever, Kizla. You are just a hater.

SOLUTION:
Non-sexual-explicit