We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

[Q]: Sent1: We seem to have more compassion for the victims and potential victims of murderers than we do for the murderers.
 Sent2: By not giving the death penalty to a slaughtering murderer, we are telling the world that the life of this murderer is worth more than that of his victim.
[A]: Not similar


[Q]: Sent1: There is not any good by taking the life of the criminal.
 Sent2: If death penalty were the solution for such criminal actions, then people who are "good" and have contributed to society deserve to live forever.
[A]: Not similar


[Q]: Sent1: If we sentence someone to life in prison, we can always free them at a later time if they are found to be innocent.
 Sent2: When a person does something horrible, we no longer see them as a human that values their life, we just see them as an epitome of hate.
[A]:
Not similar