instruction:
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
question:
When I read this article yesterday, it stated the dog was half in his yard and half out of it. It seems to me, the guy waited until he thought the dog was really going to attack him.  It's a sad situation. Maybe the owners should have had the dog on some kind of lead while outside.
answer:
No


question:
They cannot get the job done in Alaska or Washington with seniority. We elect the same people and expect different results. I am tired and frustrated of our leaders. Where are the statesmen????? Citizen legislators and not lifetime politicians are what we need.
answer:
No


question:
Translation: Trump may win the Republican nomination. There is even a small chance he will be the next President. He hates much of the present Republican establishment and would demolish it. He isn't totally on board as far as unthinking support of Israel. He is bringing on board the thoughts and needs of the very low income blue collar Republicans, people who are not regarding highly by the super rich. He supports those in border states. 

Bush is out, Rubio is in charge. 
Sure, what is said here in this article is rational and reasonable. Saying "Trump’s GOP is a rear-window party pining for a white America that never is coming back" pretty much tosses those blue collar workers under the bus.
I will be voting for Bernie, but even I recognize what is happening. 
The billionaire vote is terrified of their own base, who could cost them both the Senate and the Presidency. So that base is now fair game. The support for Rubio is now mandatory. 
Hugh Massengill, Eugene
answer:

Yes