Given a document, generate a short title of the document. The title should convey the main idea/event/topic about which the document is being written. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

Input: Consider Input: In what appears to be a shrewd attempt to preempt sexual harassment allegations  leftist documentary filmmaker Morgan Spurlock has published an essay  detailing his own struggle with sexual impropriety — and admitting to everything from sexual harassment to marital infidelity to  potentially  rape.
In reality  the essay may be an attempt to head off a wave of allegations coming  Spurlock 's way. In the piece   Spurlock  admits to settling at least one sexual harassment lawsuit  over an incident with a female employee who complained about Spurlock's on-set behavior  and to cheating on all of his romantic partners  including his two wives.
A segment of the essay is devoted to a rape accusation made against him in college.  Spurlock  claims  he  got drunk and then had sex with a girl  who  despite appearing to give consent  decided later that she felt taken advantage of.
 Spurlock  also lists a host of potential excuses for  his  behavior  from having an absent father to sexual abuse  he  says  he  suffered as a child.  He  also claims to have had something of a drinking problem "since age 13."  He  says  he  is "seeking help."
 Spurlock  is most famous for  his  series of documentaries  like "Supersize Me " exposing destructive American habits. Perhaps unsurprisingly   his  next project details issues women face in the modern world.

Output: Leftist Filmmaker Morgan Spurlock Preempts Claims Admits To Sexual Harassment


Input: Consider Input: The executive  Eric Alexander   not only obtained the medical records of the victim  who was an Uber customer in India  but shared them with other executives  according to Recode  which first reported  his  firing. Uber fired  Alexander  on Tuesday over the medical records issue  the New York Times reported.
Uber confirmed to Business Insider that  Alexander  is no longer employed by the company  but declined to comment further on the circumstances.
 Alexander  obtained the victim's medical records and showed them to Uber CEO Travis Kalanick and Emil Michael  the company's VP of business  according to the report.  Alexander  continued to carry the records around for a year until other executives obtained a copy of them and destroyed  his  copy of the records  Recode reported.
It's unclear how  Alexander  obtained the medical records. Photos online show that  Alexander  was in Delhi in December 2014 for multiple days of police questioning.
Despite Uber's top executives allegedly knowing  Alexander  had obtained the rape victim's medical records   he  remained employed by the company for the last three years.
On Tuesday  Uber announced the initial results of an investigation into charges of harassment and other complaints at the company. Although  Alexander 's acquiring of the victim's medical records was among the 215 complaints investigated  he wasn't among the 20 people the company said it had fired in response to them  according to Recode.

Output: Uber fires Eric Alexander who allegedly obtained medical records


Input: Consider Input: It was deja vu all over again. With Senate Republicans inching closer to passing an Obamacare replacement bill  a potential fulfillment of seven years of campaign promises   Arizona Senator John McCain  once again intervened to save the failing law.  He  dramatically cast the deciding vote to kill a drastically pared-down "skinny repeal" bill over the summer  then reprised the spoiler role on Friday afternoon by announcing  his  opposition to legislation championed by  his  close friend and ally  Sen. Lindsey Graham. Between  McCain 's statement and Rand Paul's unconvincing 'purity' posture  Mitch McConnell can't afford to lose a single additional member of his caucus. The truth is  he already has. Anyone who's followed Susan Collins' record on this issue knows that Graham-Cassidy is dead. She's technically only "leaning" no  but that's tantamount to a hard no; I'm fairly certain she'd vote against her own Obamacare replacement plan at this point. In revealing his intention to torpedo the latest bill -- with just days remaining before the GOP's reconciliation authority expires  according to the Senate Parliamentarian  -- McCain  used process concerns as  his  primary fig leaf:
In what way is working with Democrats  who are either staunch Obamacare defenders or already moving on to an even bigger government power-grab  likely make healthcare reform better? Like Rand Paul's weak excuse for opposing Graham-Cassidy (given his vote in favor of skinny repeal  which did far less to uproot Obamacare)   McCain 's justification makes little sense. Part of  his  Hamlet act on the previous Senate repeal bill (BCRA) was an insistence that  he  couldn't approve a plan that didn't have the full backing of  his  state's governor  Doug Ducey. "My position on this proposal will be largely guided by Governor Ducey's analysis of how it would impact the people of our state "  McCain  claimed at the time. "My friends  this is legislation that directly affects the people of my state. I trust my governor." Ducey had raised objections to the BCRA  publicly stating that he agreed with  McCain  that it was fatally flawed. While the governor eventually cleared  McCain  to back "skinny repeal" as a means to advancing the process to a conference committee  his concerns about the legislation's underlying content made  McCain 's 'no' vote easier. But guess who explicitly supported the passage of Graham-Cassidy this time? Governor Doug Ducey. Apparently "trusting his governor" no longer mattered to McCain. And then there's this:
General election ad from way back in 2016: "John McCain is leading the fight to stop Obamacare." [Link] pic.twitter.com/3a74vrDMkz â Guy Benson (@guypbenson) July 28  2017
McCain rightly and ruthlessly blasted his Democratic opponent as a supporter of a law that was inflicting disproportionate harm on Arizonans. Then he proceeded to vote exactly as she would have. The Senator's new position is that a bipartisan "fix" is in order. How would his campaign have gone if he'd told voters  "by 'we must repeal and replace Obamacare ' what I really mean is  'we must work with Patty Murray and the Democrats to tweak Obamacare after promising to abandon repeal'"? Perhaps he'd be former Senator John McCain  no longer in a position to be hailed as a "hero" by the exact same people who passionately opposed and slandered him during his presidential run  and who would have called him every name under the sun if he'd reached a different conclusion about a bill written and sponsored by his best friend in Congress. I'll leave you with some journalists wondering if Graham-Cassidy may still have a glimmer of life:


Output: John McCain: Obamacare Savior