In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

Input: Consider Input: Comment: Gay folk don't define themselves by sexual acts any more than heterosexuals to. It is the sodomy-obsessed gay-haters who try to impose such a definition.

Output: Identity-attack


Input: Consider Input: Comment: Does the name Monica Lewinsky ring any bells? "I did not have sexual relations with THAT woman". Please understand  AnnieO that "chequered" does not need to have a[sic] next to it. It is spelled correctly, this shows that you have no understanding of the English language outside of the USA, there is a world outside of the USA you know!

Output: Non-identity-attack


Input: Consider Input: Comment: The sentiments expressed by Margaret are typical of her gender. It's just evolutionary biology in action. The Globe and Mail will always call anyone with legitimate concerns of Islam "racist, bigot, Islamaphobe, xenophobe, etc etc etc". The real racists, sexists and homophobes are Muslims themselves and they'll openly admit that. It's in their holy book (the true word of god) after all. 

Muslims should not be able to pray in schools. End of story. Accommodating a religion that hates western values is ridiculous. Everything about Islam is anti-West. Women have no rights, gays are killed, leaving the religion is punishable by death. At some point you have to say no, we will not accommodate this religion. Islam should be banned from Canada all together. Islam = terrorism. That's a fact anywhere in the world that Islam goes.


Output: Identity-attack