We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.
--------
Question: You can debate that without guns there would be more deaths to other weapons although you can't debate it would be to the same extent as gun murders and crimes would be.

Answer: Valid


Question: This is just further proof that gun control does not equal crime control and there are no "reasonable" nor "responsible" gun control laws.

Answer: Valid


Question: Are you going to suggest that the lawmakers shouldn't be trusted to be armed for their own defense?

Answer:
Valid