Categorize the comment on the basis of severe toxicity. If the comment is severely toxic output Yes, otherwise output No.

Ex Input:
You just made my day calling me a "sheeple." I am still undecided and value both Sander's and Clinton's positives and recognize they both have some negatives. I find Sander's supporters overwhelmingly annoying and condescending, lacking knowledge on how voting in the primaries works and relying on conspiracy theories to justify their atrocious behavior.

Ex Output:
No


Ex Input:
Junior, you have the emotional maturity of a stoned 14 year old drop out who can't handle his weed. that you are incapable of grasping simple facts I referenced is your first clue you need to put down the bong, son.

Ex Output:
Yes


Ex Input:
bycatch: if people think Alaskans dont pay tax to live here by paying one of the highest property taxes rates, paying local sales taxes, looseing PFD income to severence taxes. That adding an income tax is an absolute necessity to be "fair and not have a free ride"  go ahead and tax the heck out of our incomes. But then I'll have to say reduce my property tax burden. Quit taxes that affect the PFD base fund income. There the math is equaled out for ya. I can reference tax data to:   http://www.keypolicydata.com/blog-archives/2015/01/severance-taxes-fuel-alaskas-highest-nation-tax-burden-2013/ 
Again I say tax is tax no matter how its removed from someones income it is still tax.

Ex Output:

No