Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.

[Q]: My grandpa was a sparky for years, both union and non union. His last 15 years was union, working on the then new tall buildings in Phoenix. I used to go union meetings with him. The hall (it really was a hall a big one)  would be packed with well over a hundred or more men. They'd talk about issues, and then vote on one or two them. He always worked, sometimes overseas, and was treated well.
[A]: No


[Q]: I've worked in public contracting for over a decade, as a contract manager for m employer, and as a community partner with it other  jurisdictions including Portland and Multnomah County. I have been dismayed, pretty much every time I've participated in Portland and Multnomah County, to find how they consistently fail to comply with state public bidding rules. My experience is that they know who they want to give the money to and they do with little to no fair access, they rarely articulate measurable outcomes, rarely monitor contracts t be sure taxpayers money is well spent, and almost never introduce consequences when contractors fail to perform. I often hear from people/businesses who would like to contract with the city or county who feel completely shut out of the process.
[A]: No


[Q]: I cannot wait to see if pimping underage girls will result in a larger fine than declining to bake a cake for a gay wedding.  It will provide insight into Avakian's priorities.
[A]:
Yes