instruction:
In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: insult and non-insult. Insult is any lanugage or act that is disrespectful or scornfully abusive.
question:
Comment: Geno!!!
answer:
Non-insult


question:
Comment: "Patient"? Hell [says the vulture] let's go and KILL something!
answer:
Non-insult


question:
Comment: Yes.  If we are talking about actual sexual assault survivors, i.e. the victim of a violent sexual assault, then I agree with him.  However if we are embracing the hysterics of 'all women must be believed, then I take issue.  I have investigated both, and done a proper job on each one.   The difference is that when it is obvious that the complainant is not truthful, it is maddening.  Time and resources are wasted.   Please note, I am not saying kick them out the door in the first instance.   However, when you have spoken to the complainant, then the suspect, and any witnesses involved, and there is no evidence, it is time to go.  This is where the unfounded come in.   Once the matter is headed for the courts, I fully support the complainant, because there is evidence to support the allegations. Prior to that, it is the job of the police to ask probing questions, especially if we feel we are being lied to and manipulated.
answer:

Non-insult