We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

Input: Consider Input: By the way, you forgot army tanks, and military jet fighters, grenade launchers, military attack helos, and land owners who keep aircraft carriers in their stock tanks, or how about people using their chimneys for missle silos.

Output: Valid


Input: Consider Input: Henry Knox later served as sec of state and "declared" the amendments during martial law and reconstruction to be approved and ratified by the States which was impossible since those State Legislators were prevented from meeting/adjourning.

Output: Valid


Input: Consider Input: They are the ones that will ignore reason and just yell their opinions even if they know they are lies and won't work.


Output: Valid