In this task, you will be shown a sentence, and you should determine whether it is overruling or non-overruling. In law, an overruling sentence is a statement that nullifies a previous case decision as a precedent by a constitutionally valid statute or a decision by the same or higher ranking court which establishes a different rule on the point of law involved. Classify your answers into overruling or non-overruling

Q: olson's plea colloquy reflects confusion; he admitted to both soliciting a minor whom he believed was 15 years old and a minor who was ""over the age of 16."" due to this discrepancy, the district court concluded that olson had not provided a sufficient factual basis to support his guilty plea.

A: non-overruling
****
Q: accordingly, to the extent our decision in ashness is inconsistent with this opinion, we decline to follow it.

A: overruling
****
Q: it is unlikely that similar circumstances will often be replicated, but where a judge does come to have  no matter how  extrajudicial ""personal knowledge"" of a ""disputed evidentiary fact[],"" as we conclude was the case here, the trial judge is required to recuse herself under subsection (a) of canon 3(e)(1); model judicial code, rule 2.11(a)(1).

A:
non-overruling
****