We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

[Q]: Sent1: Capital punishment frees up jail cells: Considering how few people we execute and how many new people enter the prison system each year, I do not see this as being a very good argument.
 Sent2: Well lets see - we have had about 70 executions in the last few years, people held on death row.
[A]: Not similar


[Q]: Sent1: If these bleak prospects aren't enough to deter someone from committing a serious crime, what will ramping it up to the death penalty do?
 Sent2: Death penalty are given to those who have comitted a very serious crime.
[A]: Not similar


[Q]: Sent1: Although there is much controversy about him, I agree that prisons, especially for those for whom the death penalty could be considered, should be punishment.
 Sent2: Well I, as creator of this debate, think that there should not be a death penalty.
[A]:
Not similar