We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

[EX Q]: Sent1: Consequences are there to deter people from doing wrong."
 Sent2: Most people who would be deterred already seem to be deterred by life without parole as a punishment.
[EX A]: Not similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: If we don't stop the death penalty before we try to fix it, the imperfect system will continue to convict innocent people while we determine what is best for it.
 Sent2: By the same token, if we keep administering the death penalty while the system is broken, we will have a much greater risk of putting someone innocent to death.
[EX A]: Similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: I believe that murder is the killing of a human being.
 Sent2: I don't think anyone has been put the death for third degree murder either.
[EX A]:
Not similar