We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

[Q]: Henry Knox later served as sec of state and "declared" the amendments during martial law and reconstruction to be approved and ratified by the States which was impossible since those State Legislators were prevented from meeting/adjourning.
[A]: Valid


[Q]: If Africa has no Second Amendment, and thus no legal right for anyone to have access to guns, and thus no legal ground for having gun shops, then why are these guerrillas getting their munitions?
[A]: Valid


[Q]: You want unarmed passengers to fight an armed terrorist to retake control of hijacked airplanes.
[A]:
Valid