In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: toxic and non-toxic. Toxicity is defiend as anything that is rude, disrespectful, or unreasonable that would make someone want to leave a converation.

Q: Comment: He also said 'I saw thousands of Muslims cheering in New Jersey on 9/11'.......so is your statement even remotely relevant...
I can quote a lot of other things he said as well....'I'm going to build a wall and Mexico is going to pay for it'.....
He will say anything at any time....because he is intellectually lazy, ignorant, and does not care...

A: Toxic
****
Q: Comment: DJ said yesterday again he will make a new law preventing former government officials from lobbying for foreign governments.  Cut the Clintons off but also the Doles if the world too.  90+ and still in the game.

A: Non-toxic
****
Q: Comment: Would you rather have people with no background and no knowledge of the issues helping to shape technical policies that impact the development of our economy? CIHA is one of the main reasons there is still decent housing opportunities available in Anchorage for lower income families. What's their "conflict of interest"? Supporting policies that make this work easier? Better than conflicts that support large lot, single family housing with high density/mixed use excluded, which is what pretty much every private developer in this town seems to want. 

Finally, what is the "lack of transparency" of which you speak and how does that relate to the subject of this article?

A:
Non-toxic
****