We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Q: Sent1: The death penalty is not deterrance for the person executed.
 Sent2: Many people argue that the death penalty is not a detterence.

A: Similar
****
Q: Sent1: DNA technology could be required for the death penalty making it far less likely that an innocent is sentenced to death.
 Sent2: My argument makes it clear that innocent people need not be sentenced to death in order for the death penalty to be unjust.

A: Not similar
****
Q: Sent1: If they don't want to kill an innocent person, stick to life in prison.
 Sent2: But it costs more, kills more innocents, and has no more advantages to life in prison.

A:
Similar
****