Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.

Ex Input:
Larry, so you understand the significance of the problem- the pending extinction of elephants and rhinos, but you want to make zero sacrifice to do anything about it?  

Many poor Africans argue they need to kill elephants to make money- and none of these Africans are getting annual Permanent Fund Dividend checks, or the numerous other welfare benefits that are doled out in Alaska.

There have been many cases where walrus have been illegally slaughtered in Western Alaska- only to take tusks.   A recent, vile case involved the killing of many walrus with semi- automatic weapons, and the only thing harvested were the tusks. 

Where do you think the Chinese are going to turn when they can no longer illegally import elephant and rhino ivory due to loss of these animals?

And you do understand walrus are under significant threat due to the loss of sea ice?

Ex Output:
No


Ex Input:
Alex,
     How many of your remarks are true? Right from Pebbles own website they are only claiming up to 1000 jobs that will last from 20 to 25 years. Then what? Look at Detroit or Pittsburgh after their economy's turned down. And they had more than one industry to fall back on. It happens everywhere, when the industry dries up and the company's leave, it is left up to the local people and tax payers to clean up the mess left behind. Why risk one of the greatest unspoiled places on Earth so a very few people can make a little more money?

Ex Output:
No


Ex Input:
Suzy. except that all this was written and confirmed before kine of like the blue dress distortion and the Hillary attacks on the 7 women Bill had flings with or raped?? Don't you just hate it when facts prove you wrong?

Ex Output:

Yes