We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

[Q]: Sent1: Again, I support the death penalty for certain crimes and criminals.
 Sent2: that is why I support it for serial killers, I don't really support it for a murderer.
[A]: Similar


[Q]: Sent1: Only some states use the death penalty, only some countries allow the death penalty.
 Sent2: If anything, this kind of "argument" is an argument for abolishing the death penalty, since it isn't used uniformly across the entire country.
[A]: Not similar


[Q]: Sent1: There would be executions for murderers and jail time for others.
 Sent2: IE - the death penalty acts as a deterrent to other would be murderers.
[A]:
Not similar