Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.

Q: Consider for a moment that Senator Kelly's own son (Kelly fully supports Dunleavy's efforts) was found guilty of child sexual abuse. We have discovered that child sexual abuse is very common and has been for centuries, but only recently have we begun to acknowledge the horrific prevalence of both child abuse and sexual assault of women. Sexuality education can help to clarify the meaning and nature of "consent." Child sexual abuse and sexual assault occur most commonly among those a victim trusts, including family members. An historical perspective from the Social Science Research Council: http://blogs.ssrc.org/tif/2012/07/13/placing-childhood-sexual-abuse-in-historical-perspective/. While the danger has always been present in human societies, we have recently begun to acknowledge the danger many children face, though denial also remains prevalent.

A: Yes
****
Q: Boy, I seem to have gotten under your skin. No one is buying your pathetic attempt to tar my motives. My track record is too well known as a PITA of bad developers. You need to go lie down and let your heart rate come back to normal. Then read my piece again as a _true_ example of citing documented facts. You could learn a few things. -- Paul

A: No
****
Q: Lucy Vinis for Mayor!

A:
No
****