In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: insult and non-insult. Insult is any lanugage or act that is disrespectful or scornfully abusive.

Example Input: Comment: The primary definition of a “weapon” is: “a thing designed or used for inflicting bodily harm or physical damage.”
A "lash" is the flexible part of a whip. A whip is primarily used to cause pain as punishment or as a stimulus to action. I suspect that Jesus wasn't intent on inflicting bodily harm on the moneychangers, and upsetting the tables may have scattered "the merchandise," but there was no physical damage.
Jesus "took the lash" to "stimulate" an examination of conscience: "It is written: 'My house shall be a house of prayer,' but you are making it a den of thieves.'" (Mt. 21:13)
Again, the one time a weapon -- a sword not a whip -- was wielded in Jesus’ presence, he clearly demanded, “Stop, no more of this!” (Lk.21:51)
Jesus "took the lash" once and then laid it down. He said, "I have given you a model to follow." We have taken and continue taking up arms to inflict bodily pain and physical damage. When will we follow Jesus example and lay down all weapons?
Example Output: Non-insult

Example Input: Comment: She should be jailed and banned for life to ever owning any animal. People who exploit animals to the degree of suffering need to be punished, not slapped on the hand.
Example Output: Non-insult

Example Input: Comment: " China is very committed to the Paris Climate Change Agreement "
China committed to nothing except business as usual.
"In recent years, the Obama administration has sought to highlight cooperation on climate change, but China’s commitments, first made in 2014, have been less a concession to American pressure than a restatement of its own goals. They include a promise for China’s carbon emissions to reach a plateau or decline “around 2030,” but without any specific target for reductions like those Mr. Obama pledged for the United States (between 26 and 28 percent of 2005 levels by 2025). That means China has plenty of room to continue burning fossil fuels to power its economy."
see: Rare Harmony as China and U.S. Commit to Climate Deal @ NYTimes 09/03/16
Lets not forget about this either
see:China Burns Much More Coal Than Reported, Complicating Climate Talks@ NYTimes 11/03/15
Under reporting must be part of there commitment.
Example Output:
Non-insult