We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Input: Consider Input: Sent1: So should we be able to impose the sentence of life without parole, all the while understanding that we may have put an innocent man in prison for life?
 Sent2: Back to reality, we convict the wrong person all the time, and we've set up a system where death penalty is actually more expensive than life in prison.

Output: Not similar


Input: Consider Input: Sent1: I do feel that those who murder in cold blood would be more than deserving of the death penalty.
 Sent2: I firmly believe that some crimes and criminals are deserving of death.

Output: Similar


Input: Consider Input: Sent1: If someone keeps killing and killing and killing, we need to stop him from taking lives.
 Sent2: After we get through that, if he still retains the death penalty, it's a lot cheaper to kill him than to keep him up 'til he dies in prison.


Output: Not similar