In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Q: Comment: The response below was censored. Why??

I can say "Orthodox Jews"

I can also say Sharia law, burka, honor killings, Assad soldiers raping women, Isis raping women.

A: Sexual-explicit
****
Q: Comment: Yes it is.
There are only two sexes.
Male and Female
A boy may feel he is a girl, but that peepee between his legs denotes his sex.
Anything is is just bad wiring.  Sorry, but that's the truth.

A: Sexual-explicit
****
Q: Comment: "Daniel, an emotional-support duck, on board a recent American Airlines flight." They even gave the duck (named Daniel) a first time fliers certificate. So I guess the question is why they did not believe a dog was a service animal but a duck was? I am not getting into a discussion about service animals and PTSD but why the difference in policy? It was a big PR gimmick with the duck that now is going to bite them in the butt.

A:
Sexual-explicit
****