Given a document, generate a short title of the document. The title should convey the main idea/event/topic about which the document is being written. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

Input: Consider Input: WASHINGTON â  Anthony Scaramucci   President Trump's former communications director  is on a list of people blocked from entering the White House without special approval.
A day after saying he wasn't blocked  a White House official confirmed that  Scaramucci  is indeed among fired officials excluded from the campus. The acknowledgment came after the financier provided to Bloomberg News official White House correspondence that confirmed he was denied an appointment.
 Scaramucci  is among a group of former staffers who left "under adverse circumstances" placed on an "administrative exclusion list " the White House said in response to Bloomberg's questions. Those former employees must have any appointments on the premises "evaluated on a case by case basis."
 Scaramucci  provided emails indicating  he  had been denied access to the complex to counter a White House official's assertion Thursday that  his  claim of being blacklisted from the building was false. At the time  the official - who requested anonymity to discuss personnel matters - said  Scaramucci  was treated the same as any former staffer and would be granted access if  he  had legitimate  official business.
 Scaramucci  slams 'General Jackass' Kelly for blocking W.H. access
When an aide on Feb. 6 tried to get  Scaramucci  into the building  the Secret Service agent in charge of the appointment-scheduling system emailed that  Scaramucci  is "administratively excluded from entering the complex at this time (not allowed access)." The agent referred questions to White House Management and Administration staffer Monica Block.
Another message shows that when the aide asked Block about access for  Scaramucci   Block said only White House chief of staff John Kelly or deputy chief of staff Joe Hagin could override Scaramucci's exclusion.
The former communications adviser believes Kelly is blocking his access to the president.  Scaramucci  called for the chief of staff's resignation last month after disclosures that former staff secretary Rob Porter kept his job with access to top-secret information despite a background investigation that revealed allegations of domestic abuse by two of Porter's ex-wives.
 Scaramucci  calls former White House colleague 'Sith Lord'
Anthony Scaramucci with President Trump in a photo posted June 29  2017  and captioned: "Thanks @POTUS @realDonaldTrump thanks for a great meeting and great day." ( Anthony Scaramucci  via Twitter)
The dispute over access to the White House comes as  Scaramucci  has renewed his offensive against Kelly following a chaotic week that included the resignation of Hope Hicks  a longtime Trump loyalist who now holds the communications director position.
"Does the president want to lose everyone because of General Jackass?"  Scaramucci  said Thursday in an interview with Bloomberg News  warning there would be "a further evacuation of talent."
 Scaramucci  denies claims in Trump book  trashes Bannon
Kelly on Friday defended  his  handling of the Porter scandal in a discussion with reporters  saying  he  had obtained a resignation from the former aide within hours of learning of the abuse allegations and tightened access to classified material at the White House. Kelly did acknowledge a "disconnect" at the White House in evaluating Porter's background check and a "mix-up" in issuing a public statement supportive of the former staff secretary despite the allegations.

Output: Scaramucci is on White House 'exclusion list' barrinng visits


Input: Consider Input: Laura Ingraham  was one of the few people who saw Donald Trumpâs shocking victory coming. More importantly  as a former speechwriter for Ronald Reagan who saw firsthand how viciously the Bush-aligned establishment despised Reaganâs working-class voters   Ingraham  understands how powerful the conservative-populist movement is and why the elites in the permanent political class have spent gazillions and worked overtime for three decades to thwart it.
In  her  blockbuster new book  Billionaire at the Barricades: The Populist Revolution from Reagan to Trump  Ingraham  the best-selling author  explains how Trump got elected and the forces heâand other economic nationalistsâwill have to battle to implement the peopleâs agenda.
Billionaire at the Barricades is a must-read because  Ingraham   who still gets chills when she sees footage of the crowd at Kemper Arena in 1976 realizing they had nominated the wrong man in Gerald Ford  takes readers on a fast-paced journey through the 2016 campaign cycle and shows how everyone who was blindsided by Trumpâs rise should have seen it coming  especially after Dave Bratâs shocking primary victory over then-House Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-VA) in 2014.
Elites give off the impression that Trumpâs populism on the campaign trail was something they had never seen before when  in fact  every candidate who has won the presidency in the television age has been the one who was the most populist. As  Ingraham  writes  âpresidential candidates invoke the populist style because it connects with working people.â
Conservatism and populism  according to  Ingraham   âoverlap in their opposition to âbig thingsââbig government  big international organizations  big media  big business cronyism.â
Reagan understood that âthese distant  uncaring entities rob people of decision making and ignore their interests â and  Ingraham  notes that âPat Buchanan and Donald Trump summarized conservative populism best when each vowed to put âAmerica first.ââ
âConservative populists tend to support a policy of economic nationalismâpeople-centered economic policies that put the nation and its workers first. They oppose a massive national debt because it weakens America and makes its citizens beholden to lenders â  she  continues. âThey also believe high taxes are bad because they sap workersâ wages and economic freedom. Similarly  they are against huge trade deals and international organizations like the World Trade Organization because they take power out of the hands of voters and give it to a far-away and often hostile global elite.â
When it comes to foreign policy   Ingraham  explains that âconservative populists oppose broad military interventionism and believe military force should only be used when American interests are threatened.â  She  slams populismâs critics who foolishly toss around âthe term âisolationismâ to dismiss populist foreign policy â even though that label does not describe any populist  she  has ever known.
 Ingraham  points out that âthroughout the Cold War  populists were among the strongest voices opposing Soviet communism.â In addition  populists have always believed that âsquandering the nationâs wealth and blood on un-winnable wars and nation-building is unwise. Instead  they support a pragmatic foreign policy based on achieving âpeace through strengthâ by maintaining a strong military and using it prudently.â
Unfortunately  as  Ingraham  details  âsome conservatives took a dangerous detourâ and âthrust us into a bizarre world of globalization  wars based on idealism and nation-building  and intense hatred toward the very voters who accounted for the Reagan coalition in the first place.â
The betrayal started almost immediately after George H.W. Bush won Reaganâs third term. The Bush administration purged Reaganites  and  Ingraham  recalls that Margaret Tutwiler told Reaganite Ed Rollins at a party that âthere are a lot of us who had to suffer during the eight years of Reagan  and now itâs our turn.â
âWe were Reagan people. They were Bush people. We all knew what the differences were â  Ingraham  writes. âMany of the GOP Establishment types who behind closed doors scoffed at Reagan as a dim-witted former actor with anââultraconservativeâ outlook were now working in the Bush administration. They thought it was time to return the Republican Party to what they believed was its more genteel  respectable roots. In effect  it meant the return to power of the Rockefeller Republicans who had worked to deny Reagan the presidency in 1976.â
Bushâs Office of Management and Budget Director Richard Darman convinced Bush to infamously abandon his âread my lipsâ pledge not to raise taxes  and  in the end   Ingraham  argues that âGeorge H. W. Bush stalled the conservative-populist engine that powered Reaganism.â As Rollins said  âGeorge Bush was the beneficiary of the greatest baton pass in presidential history in 1988  and he and his people tossed it away.â
âGlobalism is fundamentally anti-American because it aims to raze American sovereignty by atrophying our ability to take independent actions that are in our nationâs best interests â  Ingraham  writes  pointing out that globalists do not understand that âbecause of the enormous anti-American sentiment around the world  itâs almost impossible to create a multinational organization where U.S. interests donât become compromised or harmed.â
Just like his father  George W. Bush campaigned as a populist but governed as a globalist.  Ingraham  blames âBushâs decision to aggressively pursue amnesty after his unpopular warâ for insulting the âmillions of conservative-populists who had worked so hard to put him in power.â
âBecause of Bush  conservatives lost everything â  she  continues. âWe lost the House. We lost the Senate. And we lost the White House.â

Output: Laura Ingrahamâs âBillionaire at the Barricadesâ Gives Conservative


Input: Consider Input: Hey   Megyn Kelly . Here's an idea: maybe don't ask Jane Fonda about her plastic surgery when she's talking about a movie she worked on.
In an excruciating interview on the Today show  Fonda and Robert Redford chatted to  Kelly  about upcoming film Our Souls at Night.
 Kelly  began by talking to Redford about  his  Hollywood career highlights and  his  iconic role as Hubble in The Way We Were. But  when  she  turned to  Fonda  Kelly  decided to ask  her  about  her  appearance  and—specifically—the plastic surgery  she 's had. Faced with this question  Fonda's face said it all.
"You've been an example to everyone in how to age beautifully  and with strength. You've admit you've had work done  which I think is to your credit " said  Kelly .  Kelly  then asked  Fonda  why  she  doesn't feel proud to admit that  she 's had work done.
"Well thanks. Good attitude  good posture  take care of  myself   but let me tell you why I love this movie that we did  Our Souls At Night  rather than plastic surgery " Fonda continued.


Output: Jane Fonda has zero time for Megyn Kelly's annoying question about her plastic surgery