In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: threat and non-threat. Threat is a statement that someone will be hurt or harmed, especially if the person does not do something in particular.

[Q]: Comment: What a mega waste of borrowed money! All Trudeau needed to do was talk to former PM Jean Chretien on the airplane about it. We all remember how Chretien killed the GST. He is the expert. Harper actually kept more promises. Stupid ones like the gun registry and wheat board come to mind. The GST is something Trudeau never promised to touch, but the party owes us closure. It would actually help get the economy back to abolish GST and cancel some obsolete programs like the RRSP disaster. 

With Carbon taxes planned, the GST promise Chretien made could finally be honoured. Why do they call politician honourable when they're not?
[A]: Non-threat


[Q]: Comment: He is repugnant and if he had any decency, and if he is truly solrry, he would resign.   We will know shortly if he is truly sorry.
[A]: Non-threat


[Q]: Comment: We should install a law where dangerous perps should be executed within a week. We all would save time, money and over crowded prisons. I just can't understand death row inmates waiting for months or years.
[A]:
Threat