We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

[EX Q]: Sent1: You are probably going to murder somebody; hopefully it will b in a place with the death penalty and then you will get what you deserve.
 Sent2: I highly doubt the backing of why you personally would want the death penalty invoked is because you're worried at home that a mass murderer is going to escape and kill you or someone you love... seriously?
[EX A]: Not similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: The death penalty is an effective deterrent when used properly.
 Sent2: These two statistics show that the justice system is too imperfect for capital punishment to be used effectively.
[EX A]: Not similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: As far as someone killing while in prison, or escaping and killing innocents, I have addressed this too, and have stated that this is part of the reason I support the death penalty.
 Sent2: If there was no justifiable reason for the murder then I don't care who kills the bastard... the state or a civilian.
[EX A]:
Not similar