We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

[Q]: Attorney General John Ashcroft, for example, says that the second amendment protects an individual right to bear arms, but he has also stated that he supports the extension of the Federal Assault Weapons Ban.
[A]: Valid


[Q]: The PA constitution has provisions for both duty to serve and Right to bear arms, A provision from Address of PA Minority contains defense of state as well as hunting so clearly both individual and collective purposes.
[A]: Valid


[Q]: I thought my point was to prove that your laws would be so open that heavily armed Arabs could walk onto the plane and very easily take it over.
[A]:
Valid