In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.

Ex Input:
Comment: Furlong did lie. Let's not forget that. At first he denied being in BC during an earlier stint in Burns Lake, then he admitted it, downplaying the commission of almost 2 years of his life and his original start in Canada. While that doesn't mean he hid something, it does bring up the matter of deception and convenient forgetfulness.

That si why he has zero claim for libel or wrongful dismissal.

So let him get on with his life, but not as a trusted public speaker or figure. His showboating style (Evermet him? Lots of self-promotion in his personality) is something he paid a price for.

Ex Output:
Disagree


Ex Input:
Comment: Are you kidding me ?  That's wishful thinking run amok .  Who told you that ? FNN , The Washington Post or New York Times ?   Murkowski is stabbing her fellow republican's in the back.  You think they are going to tolerate that ?  Look what happens in the Alaska legislature when people aren't loyal . And that's child play compared to the U.S. Senate .  She is clearly digging her and Alaska's grave by her disloyalty . Only Dan Sullivan can save us from being punished because of her.

Ex Output:
Disagree


Ex Input:
Comment: Fake news. Fake editorial.

Ex Output:

Disagree