Given a passage, construct a question on the basis of the information present in the passage. Construct the question in such a way that (i) it is unambiguous, (ii) it is answerable from the passage, (iii) its answer is unique (iv) it answer uses text phrases from the passage. Avoid creating questions that (i) can't be answered correctly without actually understanding the passage and (ii) uses the same words or phrases given in the passage.

Ex Input:
5-hydroxytryptamine-3 (5-HT3) receptor antagonists inhibit gastric phase-3 motor activity in the dog. This study examined the role of 5-HT3 receptors in the generation of gastric phase 3 of the migrating motor complex in humans.', 'Interdigestive motor activity was recorded manometrically in 16 subjects before and after administration of ondansetron, a selective 5-HT3 receptor antagonist. Plasma motilin values were also assayed in 7 individuals. The incidence of gastric activity fronts before and after ondansetron was compared with a control group that had not received ondansetron. The ability of erythromycin to induce a gastric activity front in the presence of ondansetron was also evaluated in 7 subjects.', 'The incidence of gastric activity fronts was 69% before ondansetron vs. 19% after ondansetron. In contrast, in the control group there was no significant change in the incidence of gastric activity fronts over time. Activity fronts preceding ondansetron were associated with motilin peaks while activity fronts after ondansetron were not. Despite the previous administration of ondansetron, erythromycin induced gastric activity fronts in 89% of cases.

Ex Output:
Are 5-hydroxytryptamine-3 receptors involved in the initiation of gastric phase-3 motor activity in humans?


Ex Input:
Ovarian cancer (OvCa) is the most lethal gynecologic malignancy in the United States because of chemoresistant recurrent disease. Our objective was to investigate the efficacy of inhibiting the Notch pathway with a γ-secretase inhibitor (GSI) in an OvCa patient-derived xenograft model as a single agent therapy and in combination with standard chemotherapy.', 'Immunocompromised mice bearing xenografts derived from clinically platinum-sensitive human ovarian serous carcinomas were treated with vehicle, GSI (MRK-003) alone, paclitaxel and carboplatin (P/C) alone, or the combination of GSI and P/C. Mice bearing platinum-resistant xenografts were given GSI with or without paclitaxel. Gene transcript levels of the Notch pathway target Hes1 were analyzed using RT-PCR. Notch1 and Notch3 protein levels were evaluated. The Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to assess significance between the different treatment groups.', 'Expression of Notch1 and 3 was variable. GSI alone decreased tumor growth in two of three platinum-sensitive ovarian tumors (p\u2009<\u20090.05), as well as in one of three platinum-sensitive tumors (p\u2009=\u20090.04). The combination of GSI and paclitaxel was significantly more effective than GSI alone and paclitaxel alone in all platinum-resistant ovarian tumors (all p\u2009<\u20090.05). The addition of GSI did not alter the effect of P/C in platinum-sensitive tumors. Interestingly, although the response of each tumor to chronic GSI exposure did not correlate with its endogenous level of Notch expression, GSI did negatively affect Notch signaling in an acute setting.

Ex Output:
Does inhibition of notch signaling in combination with Paclitaxel reduce platinum-resistant ovarian tumor growth?


Ex Input:
Current conceptualizations of drug reinforcement assume that drug-taking behavior is a consequence of the contingent, temporal relationship between the behavior and drug reward. However, stimulant drugs also potentiate the rewarding effects of other reinforcers when administered noncontingently.', 'These studies were designed to determine whether noncontingent nicotine enhances the reinforcing properties of a nonpharmacological reinforcer and whether this direct effect facilitates operant behavior within the context of a nicotine self-administration procedure.', 'Rats self-administered nicotine or food, or received noncontingent nicotine, saline, or food either with or without a response-contingent, unconditioned reinforcing visual stimulus (VS).', 'Noncontingent nicotine, whether delivered as discrete injections based on a pattern of self-administered nicotine or as a continuous infusion, increased response rates maintained by the VS. There were no significant differences in responding by animals that received contingent compared with noncontingent nicotine when a VS was available. This increase was not observed in the absence of the VS or as a consequence of noncontingent food delivery. Operant behavior was equally attenuated and reinstated by the removal and subsequent replacement of contingent and noncontingent nicotine. Nicotine supported self-administration in the absence of response-contingent, nicotine-paired stimuli; however, response rates were drastically reduced compared with nicotine self-administration with the VS.

Ex Output:

Is operant responding for a visual reinforcer in rats enhanced by noncontingent nicotine : implications for nicotine self-administration and reinforcement?