In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Comment: Um, Bill Clinton paid Paula Jones almost a million dollars in a sexual harassment lawsuit. There are 18 other women- including Juanita Broaddrick who says Clinton raped her- who are sexual assault victims of Bill Clinton
Sexual-explicit

Comment: Yes, suck it did.  It sucked.  Sucked eggs.  Sucked the hind teat.  Sucked like nothing's ever sucked before.

But, for a suck-up like you who's been sucked in since forever, just suck it up and hope you suck out.
Sexual-explicit

Comment: Re: "Some reporters are very rude and very aggressive they get in your face and don't back off."

That's part of their job - to obtain facts and information. Besides, the reporter was just following up on Gianforte's 'promise' (I jest) to give his thoughts on the ACHA once the CBO report had been released. The reporter here was doing the very job he gets paid to do, and was exercising his 1st Amendment rights. And, btw, Gianforte STILL hasn't actually answered the question.  Why you cut the politician so much slack? Heck, you don't even mention the fact that Gianforte 1.) assaulted the reporter, and 2.) admitted it.

Re: "the MSM didn't tell the full story as usual only one side."

Demonstrably B.S. A Fox reporter (about as MSM, even if far right, as you can get) verified the assault that Gianforte himself admits to.

Re: "Some of these vey [sic] crude rude in your face reporters are just asking to be pushed back."

Nothing justifies assault.

Apologist!

Non-sexual-explicit