We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

[EX Q]: A much higher gun ownership rate than other developed nations could explain this- that although crime occurs less frequently in the US crime is more likely to involve guns in the US so someone is more likely to die.
[EX A]: Valid

[EX Q]: The people in Mumbai learned that the hard way this year when that handful of terrorists came in and slaughtered several hundred innocent people in a matter of days without any opposition.
[EX A]: Valid

[EX Q]: There's no evidence to prove the believe that when guns are less available, less criminals will be armed than if guns were more readily available.
[EX A]:
Valid