In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

Q: Comment: Asian countries for Asians.

Black countries for Blacks.

but White countries for everybody?

That's genocide.

Anti-racist is a codeword for Anti-White.

A: Identity-attack
****
Q: Comment: "the men"? You mean the bishops? Prove they don't love homosexuals. Prove it. Homosexual activity is evil. Its simple. All people are to be loved, not used as objects. Homosexual activity uses another person as an object to masturbate with.  Not so nice!

A: Identity-attack
****
Q: Comment: 'Many who demand measures to ensure a higher conviction rate in cases of alleged sexual assault seem to want ..."

Don't know about that.  Do you mean, "Many who demand a lower "unfounded" rate to ensure a higher conviction rate ..."  Don't know that they'll see that, either. What that undoubtedly assures is more cases going to trial. 

It COULD be that a number of "unfounded" cases reflect that lack of evidence/low odds of success in particular cases.  Who knows how many women have been spared the soul-destroying experience of reliving their rape in a public court of law--and repeatedly being aggressively challenged on their recollections, their intent, or behaviour?

A:
Non-identity-attack
****