We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

Example Input: What I don't get is why gay rights groups, neo nazis, white supremacists, pro-abortionists and war protesters all get treated with response and dignity, but groups of gun owners are treated like third class citizens.
Example Output: Valid

Example Input: I can understand your belief that gun control won't work and that owning guns is a good thing, I don't agree with it, but is hardly beyond comprehension.
Example Output: Valid

Example Input: Although a federal ballistic fingerprint law may be more effective than a patchwork of state systems, the costs of creating, maintaining, and using a federal system are likely to be substantial.
Example Output:
Valid