In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

Example Input: Sentence: Steve follows Fred's example in everything. He admires him hugely.
 Reason: The 'He' refers to steve because The pronoun probably refers to Steve who follows Fred for admiring him. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Example Output: Correct

Example Input: Sentence: Steve follows Fred's example in everything. He admires him hugely.
 Reason: The 'He' refers to steve because Fred influences Steve hugely. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Example Output: Wrong

Example Input: Sentence: Everyone really loved the oatmeal cookies; only a few people liked the  chocolate chip cookies. Next time, we should make more of them .
 Reason: The 'them' refers to the oatmeal cookies because Why would one make fewer of the more popular cookie?. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Example Output:
Wrong