TASK DEFINITION: We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.
PROBLEM: Sent1: If we can not prevent the innocent from unjust punishment, we should not have the death penalty.
 Sent2: The fact is that as long as we have a death penalty (the only Western nation to have it), we will execute innocents with the guilty.

SOLUTION: Similar

PROBLEM: Sent1: The person who said that the death penalty should be used for people who are convicted of multiple-burglaries sounds like a complete knucklehead.
 Sent2: When someone mentions a criminal deterrence factor with death sentences, it sounds like a bad joke or total ignorance.

SOLUTION: Not similar

PROBLEM: Sent1: The death penalty is usually given as a sentence in place of lifetime in a max security prison without parole.
 Sent2: And no one said that life in prision is "much worse" then the death penalty.

SOLUTION:
Not similar