In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: insult and non-insult. Insult is any lanugage or act that is disrespectful or scornfully abusive.
--------
Question: Comment: Sure, but the contractor still hates it.  They had staffing and budget projections based on this project.  Now all that is out the window for months to years.  The developer hates it as well, for much the same reasons.

Answer: Non-insult


Question: Comment: Zinke is an idiot.  There is no safe lead exposure level for children.  Even the tiniest amounts are toxic- and reduce IQ.  Our congressional delegation must have been exposure to lots of lead when they were kids.

Answer: Insult


Question: Comment: Please can the insults, no need to get hot, Earl.  As I pointed out, you chose to condemn a specific religion, the Muslim religion, based on practices by its founder that also existed among the founders of the Christian religion, and on pedophilia and bestiality that also exist among nominally Christian persons.  I drew parallels between Christianity and Muslim (and both are Abrahamic religions).

I didn't "pull out the racism card", I didn't use the word "racism" or "racist", or "bigotry".  Now, did I, Earl.  That was your inference, and you brought up the word, not I.

Answer:
Non-insult