We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

If you support the right to bear arms, ultimately you believe that a person should be allowed to kill somebody in self defense.
Invalid

>_> Says the person who brought up freaking Nelson in a debate about the death penalty for murders.
Valid

The law recognizes the specific distinction between those legally innocent and those actually innocent, just as common sense dictates.

Valid