In this task, you will be shown a sentence, and you should determine whether it is overruling or non-overruling. In law, an overruling sentence is a statement that nullifies a previous case decision as a precedent by a constitutionally valid statute or a decision by the same or higher ranking court which establishes a different rule on the point of law involved. Classify your answers into overruling or non-overruling

Q: to the extent that people v. wilson, 224 cal.app.2d 738 [ 37 cal.rptr. 42], is inconsistent with this conclusion it is disapproved.

A: overruling
****
Q: see smith v. babcock & wilcox constr. co., 913 s.w.2d 467, 468 (tex. 1995) (per curiam).

A: non-overruling
****
Q: we overrule division 2 in ghrist v. fricks and division 2 in matthews v. dukes, 314 ga.app. 782, 726 s.e.2d 95 (2012), to the extent they determined that the superior court had jurisdiction to sever parental rights because the termination issue was ancillary to the biological father's petition to legitimate.

A:
overruling
****