We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Ex Input:
Why not just work to reform the justice system, instead of working to stop the death penalty, then working to reform the justice system, and THEN working to reinstitute the death penalty.

Ex Output:
Valid


Ex Input:
and those are tactics that have been around since the 30's!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Ex Output:
Invalid


Ex Input:
What I saw in your previous post was some personal justification of the random attacks from a terrorist group on a country that still uses the death penalty.

Ex Output:

Valid