In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence can be inferred from the statement. Incorrect choices change the meaning in important ways or have details that are not mentioned in the statement. Indicate your answer as 1,2, or 3 corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.

Statement: This requires careful organization of the files of original observations, complete documentation of the conditions of data collection that are relevant to the trustworthiness and credibility of the information, and making transparent and reproducible the manner in which the evaluator moved from phase to phase of the analysis. Choices:  1. Several cases of fraud have been discovered where the evaluator's procedure was not well-documented. 2. It is not necessary to document the evaluator's process. 3. Thorough documentation is necessary so that the evaluator's process can be reproduced.
3

Statement: Competition is generally believed to lead to efficiency, be it economic or technical. Choices:  1. Recent events have led people to question whether or not this conventional wisdom is true. 2. Technical efficiency is believed to be one of the results of competition. 3. Technical efficiency but not economic efficiency are the end results of competition.
2

Statement: True, the Clinton administration is trying to say that food stamps are really good only if you're also working at least part-time, but that's kind of a complicated message to get across. Choices:  1. Food stamps are a necessary subsidy. 2. Food stamps can be exchanged for cash value. 3. The Clinton administration supports the needy.

3