In this task, you will be presented with a context from an academic paper and a question separated with a 
. You have to answer the question based on the context.

[Q]: The seq2seq model with global attention gives the best results with an average target BLEU score of 29.65 on the style transfer dataset, compared with an average target BLEU score of 26.97 using the seq2seq model with pointer networks. 
 Question: What is best BLEU score of language style transfer authors got?
[A]: seq2seq model with global attention gives the best results with an average target BLEU score of 29.65


[Q]: For annotation purposes, we created snippets of conversations as the ones shown in Example 1 and Example 2 consisting of the parent of the suspected trolling event, the suspected trolling event comment, and all of the direct responses to the suspected trolling event. However, the trade off is that snippets like this allow us to make use of Amazon Mechanical Turk (AMT) to have the dataset annotated, because it is not a big burden for a “turker” to work on an individual snippet in exchange for a small pay, and expedites the annotation process by distributing it over dozens of people. Specifically, for each snippet, we requested three annotators to label the four aspects previously described. 
 Question: how was annotation done?
[A]: Annotation was done with the help of annotators from Amazon Mechanical Turk on snippets of conversations


[Q]: Results in Table TABREF13 show ten probes. Again, we see the performance of baseline ELMo-transformer and mSynC are similar, with mSynC doing slightly worse on 7 out of 9 tasks. 
 Question: For how many probe tasks the shallow-syntax-aware contextual embedding perform better than ELMo’s embedding?
[A]:
performance of baseline ELMo-transformer and mSynC are similar, with mSynC doing slightly worse on 7 out of 9 tasks