In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: threat and non-threat. Threat is a statement that someone will be hurt or harmed, especially if the person does not do something in particular.

Q: Comment: Social security wouldn't need saving if the democrats hadn't spent the last 50 years robbing it.

A: Non-threat
****
Q: Comment: Love it. Coderre is such an arrogant twit and hopefully this is the last we hear of him, although I doubt we're that lucky.

A: Non-threat
****
Q: Comment: Seems like the ignorant comments here don't understand the CDQ program was inteneed to provide a share of the massive profit that offshore fisheries corporations based in Seattle were taking from waters barely beyond Alaska's jurisdiction.   It wasn't a government taking the fish, multi-billion dollar businesses outside Alaska were making enormous profits with no benefits to Alaskans who live where the resources were being stolen with zero taxation (corporate welfare to the max) of Alaskas stolen public resources.  While Seattle businessmen have been banking on our offshore resources for decades with tax breaks, Alaskans are still getting fleeced, by and by.   Alaska should sieze all the CVRF equipment and lease it for some  real economic benefit for Alaskans.  If Alaskans are as weak as these demeaning comments to the villagers, then maybe the villages should seize the equipment to provide for Alaskans.  Alaska needs some guts, and stop blaming subsistence folks for Alaskas weakness.

A:
Non-threat
****