In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: threat and non-threat. Threat is a statement that someone will be hurt or harmed, especially if the person does not do something in particular.
--------
Question: Comment: No. I'm sorry.  We are allowed to call out the Ford family legacy as harmful and embarrassing AND still also be appalled by bureaucratic waste, left wingers and right alike.  That's yet another reason why I loathe the number Rob and his strategists pulled over on us, the ridiculous us vs them, suburban vs urban, elites vs working guy baloney.  Why do people eat that up?  (God bless -- and help -- America!!)

Answer: Non-threat


Question: Comment: One of the images I saw on television over the weekend was of a female protester carrying a sign that said, "White People Suck."  And yet she was marching in support of "anti-racism."  

It's sad what the mainstream Left has become.

Answer: Non-threat


Question: Comment: No nuclear weapons and most modern heavy weapons including the outrageous 'cluster bombs' do not discriminate between combatants and civilians. Almost no weapons can be considered to come even remotely within the broadest criteria of the just war theory any longer.
We have evolved sufficiently now to be render us just stupid enough to rationalize and moralize our way to our own to collective self-destruction. 
Let's hear the Nuns' stories, learn a lesson maybe and quit the kneejerk jingoism and shallow moralizing.

Answer:
Non-threat