In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.
--------
Question: Sentence: Emma's mother had died long ago, and her place had been taken by an excellent woman as governess.
 Reason: The 'her' refers to emma's mother because Her education is managed. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

Answer: Wrong


Question: Sentence: Jackson was greatly influenced by Arnold, though he lived two centuries earlier.
 Reason: The 'he' refers to arnold because Arnold is the influencer and the subject of the sentance. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

Answer: Correct


Question: Sentence: The sack of potatoes had been placed above the bag of flour, so it had to be moved first.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the sack of potatoes because it is the sack of potatoes that is being brought to the church and is not a sack of flour. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

Answer:
Wrong