The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.

Example Input: Context: 'Can we split the water? You can have 2' 'I would prefer to have all 3 water, but I think I can make an exception since you have offered me all 3 food 🙂 Just to confirm, this means that you get 3 firewood and 1 water and I get 2 water and 3 food. Correct?' 'Yes 🙂 Do you want to make a deal?'
Utterance: 'Sure 🙂'
Example Output: No

Example Input: Context: 'Howdy! Looking for firewood, water and food--really trying to get 3 packages of each, want to make sure my family has enough supplies for camping. I don't want anyone injured or our vacation cut short.' 'Ok.  I am looking to have one package of water and on package of food.'
Utterance: 'Is there any way you could let us have 3 packages of each? I'm just trying to make sure my family has enough, we don't get to get out in the woods that often. It's really important to us.'
Example Output: Yes

Example Input: Context: 'I am walking away, completely unfair' 'You haven't offered anything and walking away means you get nothing so that doesn't seem like an option' 'You can have ALL the water, and 1 firewood'
Utterance: 'If you want two firewoods, i will need some of the food.  My family maybe cold, we can't be cold and hungry.  I need at least 1 food '
Example Output:
Yes