Given a document, an entity and its sentiment towards the entity, verify if it is the correct sentiment towards the entity. Answer should be yes or no. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

[Q]: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Bill Polian is Positive . Bill Polian   Hall of Fame executive.  His  status as a prognosticator is less solid. (NFL Network)
 Bill Polianâs  track record is undeniable. As general manager of the Buffalo Bills   he  cobbled together the lineups that advanced to four straight Super Bowls. With  Polian  at the personnel helm  the expansion Carolina Panthers advanced to the NFC championship game in just their second year of existence.  Polian  then concluded  his  career by shaping the Indianapolis Colts into a Super Bowl winner.
 He âs in  the Hall of Fame  and deserves to be  even if  his  post-football career as an ESPN analyst has been  shall we say  slightly less successful in the prediction department.
 Polian âs latest forecast involves Louisville quarterback Lamar Jackson  who  he  says is too short â at 6-foot-3 â and not accurate enough to be a successful NFL quarterback.
âI think wide receiver â  he  said  when asked about what NFL position Jackson should play Monday on ESPNâs âGolic and Wingo.â âExceptional athlete  exceptional ability to make you miss  exceptional acceleration  exceptional instinct with the ball in his hand  and that âs  rare for wide receivers. That âs  [Steelers wideout Antonio Brown] and who else  name me another one whoâs like that  right? Julio [Jones] is not like that. This guy is incredible in the open field and [has] a great ability to separate and  again  heâs short and a little bit slight and clearly  clearly not the thrower that the other guys are. His accuracy isnât there  so I would say  donât wait to make that change  donât be like the kid from Ohio State [Terrelle Pryor] and be 29 when you make the change.â
Anyway  it wouldnât be the first time  Polian  has been wrong.
 Polian  on Johnny Manziel
 Bill Polian : Johnny Manziel has magic. If you're in the Browns draft room  you owe it to the fans to consider taking him at 4. #SXMNFL â SiriusXM NFL Radio (@SiriusXMNFL) April 30  2014
 Polian  on Deshaun Watson
 Polian  on Robert Griffin III
 Polian  on Kirk Cousins and the Redskins
[A]: no


[Q]: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Kamala D. Harris is Positive . â Sen. Kamala D. Harris (D-Calif.)  on Twitter  Nov. 17
One of the most widely shared claims came from  Sen. Kamala D. Harris  who tweeted   âRetweet if you would *not* benefit from a private jet tax break â on Nov. 17  linking to a Business Insider article with the headline  âThe Republican tax bill has a provision that would end a headache for private jet owners.â  Harris âs tweet prompted nearly 69 000 retweets and more than 35 000 likes.
 Harris âs claim that the Senate bill contains a provision for a tax break on private jets comes from the Business Insider article  she  linked to in  her  tweet. The article explains how the Senate version of the GOP tax bill makes tax changes to specific industries  noting that the âthe Tax Cuts and Jobs Act would correct a long-running dispute between owners and operators of private jets and the IRS.â
 Harris  defends  her  tweet  arguing that they are simply describing the provision as it was reported in the media as a tax break. But that was not the case with the article she retweeted â which also noted that the tax provision was valued at less than $50 000 a year. Moreover  several outlets offered a detailed take on the provision  making clear it the clause aimed to settle a decades-long dispute between the IRS and private jet management companies.
Still  these tweets are not alike.  Harris  earns Three Pinocchios for referring to a âprivate jet tax breakâ and suggesting wealthy owners would gain.
[A]: yes


[Q]: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Sam Roggeveen is Neutral . Given the description  Monday's test was likely to be of the SC-19 system that was believed to have been used in knocking out a Chinese satellite in a 2007 test  said  Sam Roggeveen  a senior fellow with the Sydney-based Lowy Institute international policy  think tank.
However  the exercise may not have included an actual interception utilizing the missile's kill vehicle  but might have simply been a test of the missile's booster   Roggeveen  said.  He  also warned against assuming that the test was aimed at the U.S.  pointing instead to other regional players.
"This missile system is designed to intercept medium-range ballistic missiles  and Washington does not deploy those in the Asia-Pacific " Roggeveen said. "On the other hand  both North Korea and India do have such missiles  so this test is more about them "  he  said.
The ability to independently manufacture advanced armaments  including stealth fighters  aircraft carriers and missile defense systems  is key to China's rise as a global military power   Roggeveen  said.
[A]:
no