We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

[Q]: Sent1: If they know they'll die if caught, they'll likely kill more rape victims and children.
 Sent2: >>>If we are sure they raped & killed those innocent children then we should let them die.
[A]: Not similar


[Q]: Sent1: If it has nothing to do with the death penalty, how could it have anything to do with lives saved by the death penalty in the first place?
 Sent2: If the same murderer had been given the death penalty, and never released in the first place, he would not be able to kill again.
[A]: Not similar


[Q]: Sent1: I say that they should be killed the same way that the person(s) that they killed were.
 Sent2: I don't believe that they should because if you kill someone, they won't have the chance to either get rehabilitated nor will they have the chance to actually regret what they have done.
[A]:
Not similar