In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence can be inferred from the statement. Incorrect choices change the meaning in important ways or have details that are not mentioned in the statement. Indicate your answer as 1,2, or 3 corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.

Input: Consider Input: Statement: He bit the head off a streetcar conductor who once charged him two fares thinking the distinguished gentleman was paying for his traveling partner as well. Choices:  1. He yelled at a conductor for charging him for both himself and his friend. 2. He was so stingy with his money he wouldn't pay for his friend. 3. He politely talked to the conductor.

Output: 1


Input: Consider Input: Statement: Finally, he managed something that was adequate, if the brilliant floral sportshirt could be said to go with levi pants and a morning frock. Choices:  1. At last, he put on something that was adequate. 2. He did not care to put on any clothes at all. 3. His attire was mismatched, but he did not care.

Output: 1


Input: Consider Input: Statement: They include, but are not limited to, matters concerning (1) the use of encryption to protect the confidentiality of information and other cryptographic capabilities, including digital signatures and integrity checks, (2) personal privacy, (3) the adequacy of laws protecting intellectual property and permitting investigations into computer-related crimes, and (4) the availability of adequate technical expertise and security software tools. Choices:  1. Encryption helps ensure confidentiality.  2. Encryption does nothing to ensure confidentiality.  3. Encryption helps ensure confidentiality for medical records.


Output: 1