The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the small-talk strategy, otherwise output No. small-talk is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used for discussing topics apart from the negotiation, in an attempt to build a rapport with the opponent. For example, discussing how the opponent is doing during the pandemic or sharing excitement for the camping trip.

Context: 
Utterance: 'Hello🙂'
No

Context: 'I need a lot of food, because of how many people are coming now (like 3 times as many). Also, there's only one stream in the area and it's really far from our campsite, so it would be super inconvenient to have to hike there everyday to refill our canteens. We are in a forest though, so we should be good for wood. Since you can easily fish, what if I take 3 food and 2 water? You can keep all the firewood. 🙂' 'Well I have to have some food and I don't need all of that water.  How about I take 2 water, 1 firewood, and 1 food.  I do need the firewood to cook the fish but I dont need it to keep warm at night because I have hefty sleeping bags that work excellent in the cold.' 'That could work, but I'm still a little worried I won't have enough food for 6 people. How long are you guys going to be camping for?'
Utterance: 'I will be camping for 3 day so I gotta have some food.  Although, I do understand your situation.'
Yes

Context: 'I will have my two packages of food and only one package of firewood. I do not think I can make one package of firewood last for both of my food. ' 'So is your counter that you get 2 packages of food, 0 of water, and 2 of firewood?' 'Yes, I would be happy with two food and two firewood. That would leave you with one food and one firewood as well as all of the water.'
Utterance: 'Ok that sounds fair I agree to that 🙂'

No