In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: threat and non-threat. Threat is a statement that someone will be hurt or harmed, especially if the person does not do something in particular.

Example Input: Comment: ... Cheetolini started the fire, The Left has no problem feeding those flames and rightfully so.  He is his own worst enemy but he also creates enemies with EVERYTHING he touches.  Cheetolini is a FRAUD.
Example Output: Non-threat

Example Input: Comment: Tony - You are new to NCR or a reincarnation of a banned commentator.  Either way, it is just hubris to argue with a woman who is on the receiving end of the Church's misogyny.  Until you grow a uterus and breasts, I recommend that you listen with the ear of your heart to our sister's concerns.

You can wrap it around quote marks but when isn't misogyny "hateful"?  We aren't talking about biologically determined roles but social constructed exclusion based solely on gender.  Obviously, you know nothing about the LGBT community and your baseless claims that the T is delusional and the LGB is paraphilia is as ignorant as it is offensive.  

Are you missing the comment section of Crux?  There are many other news sites that would be more appropriate for your point-of-view.
Example Output: Non-threat

Example Input: Comment: No. I'm sorry.  We are allowed to call out the Ford family legacy as harmful and embarrassing AND still also be appalled by bureaucratic waste, left wingers and right alike.  That's yet another reason why I loathe the number Rob and his strategists pulled over on us, the ridiculous us vs them, suburban vs urban, elites vs working guy baloney.  Why do people eat that up?  (God bless -- and help -- America!!)
Example Output:
Non-threat