We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

LOL...why am I not surprised that you are undaunted by actual facts??
Invalid

i am not saying that by having one is the only determinate of clearing a suspect, ex a person has the right not to incriminate themselves, i.e. they were robbing a bank.
Invalid

Thus, it seems to be that your logic is flawed because it doesn't answer the question of what sort of crime or what persons deserve to be sentenced to death.

Valid