In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: threat and non-threat. Threat is a statement that someone will be hurt or harmed, especially if the person does not do something in particular.

Q: Comment: As long as there's free food and generous gov't handouts, you'll have the dredge of the community taking advantage.  Too lazy to work menial but honest jobs, too dumb to find a good job, but smart enough to take advantage of freebees.  Cut the entitlements for these healthy but lazy bums.  Let them starve, no one will miss them.

A: Threat
****
Q: Comment: Ah, I don't know about the "far left" [am somewhat unsure what/who you're referring to] but my remark had little to do with "the more popular religions in the US", unless you consider religious sects that post large signs saying "If you worship the Earth, I spit on your Mother", publish comments such as: "Nuke them [Moslems] until they glow; then shoot them in the dark.", call for beheading infidels, or teach that nonbelievers should burn in hell, etc, etc, etc - as outstandingly popular in the US.  And I really don't believe that ANYONE [not even most heinous of the "Far Left"] is asking that the straight population "conform" to trans-gender people either - is that even possible?? I don't think so.
Just saying - replying to comment means so much more, if you reply to the comment that posted.

A: Threat
****
Q: Comment: You mean the Economic Final Solution: dispossessing and starving the poor and vulnerable, the sick and the elderly, and consigning them to death by healthcare denied?  Sure, that is the GOP's unChristian lust for decades.  Why do you emit your toxic fumes here?  Hupage Satanas!!!

A:
Threat
****