We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

Example Input: "to keep and bear Arms" - this would include any gun
Example Output: Valid

Example Input: Can you point to the last time a private individual was successfully prosecuted either in legal or civil court for the recognized offense of having violated the constitutional rights of another private individual?
Example Output: Valid

Example Input: The illusion that the English government had protected its citizens by disarming them seemed credible because few realized the country had an astonishingly low level of armed crime even before guns were restricted.
Example Output:
Valid