The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.

Input: Consider Input: Context: 'Hi there! How are you today?' 'Good!  How are you?' 'I'm doing well! Almost ready for my camping trip. Need some more supplies though.'
Utterance: 'Which supplies do you need?'

Output: No


Input: Consider Input: Context: 'I am also going camping! What do you think you're going to need the most of? What are your preferences?' 'It's going to be hot during the day where I'm going so I'll need some extra hydration.  So water is my main priority.' 'Got it! I am going to need the most of food. There aren't any animals or berries that I feel safe eating where I'm going.'
Utterance: 'Well I think we can make a good deal then.  How many packages of food would you want?'

Output: No


Input: Consider Input: Context: 'That doesn't seem very fair ☹️. That would be 3 food and 1 firewood for 2 water. That is 4 items exchange for 2.' 'Ok what if I throw in 3 waters in exchange for 3 food and 1 firewood? So it is a 4 - 3 exchange instead.' 'Actually I changed my mind , lets just do 3 food for 3 water?'
Utterance: 'Well that is a little promising but I would really like some firewood as it makes me nice and warm and keeps the camp going 🙂.'


Output: No