The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.

Q: Context: 'Hi, what is your highest priority item?'
Utterance: 'I would love to have extra food for my trip, bringing the family! how about you?'

A: Yes
****
Q: Context: 'I would really like to come out of this with a bit more. How about 2 food for me and 1 firewood and water?' 'What are your current requirements on food so I can better understand your situation?' '☹️ I forgot most the food I was going to bring and only have enough for less than half the planned trip.'
Utterance: 'I understand. I guess we are in the same predicament. I have two kids with me though and they are hungry too. How long are you camping for? We are here a week.'

A: Yes
****
Q: Context: 'Hello, I would really like more food for my trip. If I can have all the food, and firewood, you can have all the water' 'Oh, that won't really work for me.  I was hoping to get extra food and water for this trip since I need water to take medication and would love the food to plan a special meal.  I'd like say, 2 food, 3 water and 1 firewood' 'I could give you 2 food, if I could have 3 firewood and 2 water'
Utterance: 'Hmm, how about I take 2 food and 2 water and you can have all the firewood?'

A:
No
****