In this task, you will be presented with a context from an academic paper and a question separated with a 
. You have to answer the question based on the context.

Q: Embedding: We developed different variations of our models with a simple lookup table embeddings learned from scratch and using high-performance contextual embeddings, which are ELMo BIBREF11, BERT BIBREF16 and ClinicalBERT BIBREF13 (trained and provided by the authors). 
 Question: What embeddings are used?

A:  simple lookup table embeddings learned from scratch using high-performance contextual embeddings, which are ELMo BIBREF11, BERT BIBREF16 and ClinicalBERT BIBREF13
****
Q: KGR10, also known as plWordNet Corpus 10.0 (PLWNC 10.0), is the result of the work on the toolchain to automatic acquisition and extraction of the website content, called CorpoGrabber BIBREF19 . It is a pipeline of tools to get the most relevant content of the website, including all subsites (up to the user-defined depth). The proposed toolchain can be used to build a big Web corpus of text documents. It requires the list of the root websites as the input. Tools composing CorpoGrabber are adapted to Polish, but most subtasks are language independent. The whole process can be run in parallel on a single machine and includes the following tasks: download of the HTML subpages of each input page URL with HTTrack, extraction of plain text from each subpage by removing boilerplate content (such as navigation links, headers, footers, advertisements from HTML pages) BIBREF20 , deduplication of plain text BIBREF20 , bad quality documents removal utilising Morphological Analysis Converter and Aggregator (MACA) BIBREF21 , documents tagging using Wrocław CRF Tagger (WCRFT) BIBREF22 . Last two steps are available only for Polish. 
 Question: How was the KGR10 corpus created?

A: most relevant content of the website, including all subsites
****
Q: Based on annotated corpora and token-based features, studies used machine learning approaches to build word segmentation systems with accuracy about 94%-97%. 
 Question: How successful are the approaches used to solve word segmentation in Vietnamese?

A:
Their accuracy in word segmentation is about 94%-97%.
****