In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

[Q]: Comment: No, we don't have to "agree to disagree." It's just something trite people like to say. (Note you didn't even agree but went on arguing your opinion with, of all things, an appeal to your ignorance.)

As for the appeal to cite "any person nationally," you haven't even cited anyone so bugger off already. (Note, nor would it matter as it's all just silly opinion anyway.)

I repeat, shake things up a bit and hire Kaepernick as the quarterback.
[A]: Non-identity-attack


[Q]: Comment: Well, I'm going to go to job fairs. Sad to work for all these years and loose my shirt because of someone else's planning incompetence, especially when I did that kind of work before I retired. I must say though Grabby's replacement seems to be able to manage better, but it's not going to save my retirement. Over 4 decades working and saving and investing, poof. May those brainwashed fool's running things get a long trip to the Federal vacation home in Lompoc. I'll be happy to pay for that tax burden.
[A]: Non-identity-attack


[Q]: Comment: I get discriminates against  all the time, not becasue I am gay but for being male and white..
[A]:
Identity-attack