TASK DEFINITION: Given a document, an entity and its sentiment towards the entity, verify if it is the correct sentiment towards the entity. Answer should be yes or no. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].
PROBLEM: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Gokulnath Shetty is Negative . According to court documents filed on Saturday by the CBI   branch deputy manager Gokulnath Shetty  issued a series of fraudulent Letters of Undertaking â essentially guarantees sent to other banks so that they would provide loans to a customer  in this case a group of Indian jewelry companies.
 Shetty  did so using the bankâs SWIFT system to log in with passwords that allowed  him   and in at least some instances a more junior official  to serve as both the person who sent messages and as the person who reviewed them for approval  according to court documents and interviews with bank executives.
 Shetty  is now in custody and  he  has not publicly responded to the allegations. Calls to a cell phone listed for  his  wife on court documents were not answered.
âWhen you are flooded with customers in the morning  with 101 demands  you look for shortcuts â  he  said. âYou do somebody elseâs work  somebody else does your work. You are not working in an ideal situation.â

SOLUTION: yes

PROBLEM: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Charlie Rose is Negative . CBS News has suspended  veteran journalist Charlie Rose  after eight women accused  him  of sexual misconduct in interviews with The Washington Post. Three additional unnamed women came forward in a story published by Business Insider later on Monday.
Interested in  Charlie Rose ? Add  Charlie Rose  as an interest to stay up to date on the latest  Charlie Rose  news  video  and analysis from ABC News. Add Interest
" Charlie Rose  is suspended immediately while we look into this matter. These allegations are extremely disturbing and we take them very seriously " CBS News said in a statement.
Five women told The Washington Post that Rose  an anchor for "CBS This Morning " groped them; two said that he walked naked in front of them; and one accused  Rose  of firing her after he allegedly touched her inappropriately and made sexually charged remarks to her.
The newspaper reported that  Rose 's accusers either worked with or aspired to work with him on his PBS show  "Charlie Rose " from the late 1990s to 2011. At the time of the alleged incidents  the women ranged in age from 21 to 37  according to the newspaper.
 Rose  issued an apology to the Post and later  he shared it on Twitter.
My statement in full. pic.twitter.com/3kvFrqF2dT — Charlie Rose (@charlierose) November 20  2017
Kyle Godfrey-Ryan  a former assistant to  Rose  in the mid-2000s and one of the three accusers who spoke to the Post on the record  claimed that  Rose  walked nude in front of  her  at one of his homes in New York City and called  her  in the wee hours to describe fantasies of watching  her  swim naked.  She  said that  she  reported his calls to  Rose 's longtime executive producer  Yvette Vega  who apparently told  her   "That's just Charlie being Charlie."  Vega  told the Post and later confirmed to ABC News that  she  regretted not doing more for Godfrey-Ryan and others who mounted similar complaints.
“I should have stood up for them ”  she  said. “I failed. It is crushing. I deeply regret not helping them.”
Godfrey-Ryan said that ultimately  Rose fired  her   and  she  later left journalism.
“He took me out to lunch and told me how embarrassed he was  how he didn’t treat me like that ”  she  said. “It was really about how I got it wrong  and  obviously  I couldn’t work there anymore.”
Reah Bravo  who worked alongside Rose beginning in 2007  claimed to the Post that  she  was groped -- sometimes forcefully -- by  Rose  on more than one occasion. In 2008   she  said that as  she  prepared to accept a new job   Rose  offered  her  a position in Washington  D.C.  and the opportunity to live in his Georgetown residence.  She  declined.
“I was leaving because I was getting away ”  she  said. “I would never want to live someplace where he had keys.”
Megan Creydt  the third woman who spoke to the Post on the record  overlapped with Godfrey-Ryan when  she  worked as a coordinator on  Rose 's show from 2005 to 2006. Creydt claimed that  Rose  put his hand on  her  thigh  which alarmed  her .
"I don’t think I said anything ”  she  said. “I tensed up. I didn’t move his hand off  but I pulled my legs to the other side of the car. I tried not to get in a car with him ever again. I think he was testing me out.”
In a statement to ABC News  Yvette Vega  executive producer on “ Charlie Rose  ” said: “I should have stood up for them. I failed. It is crushing. I deeply regret not helping them.”

SOLUTION: no

PROBLEM: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Kim is Negative . The impetus for the talks came in  Kim âs annual New Yearâs speech on January 1  when  he  proposed direct discussions with Seoul âover the issue of improving inter-Korean relations by our nation itself â with the goal to âdefuse the current military tension.â  Kim  also welcomed the upcoming Winter Olympics as a âgood occasion for demonstrating our nationâs prestige â and said  he  wanted to send a delegation.
But while the bilateral talks were widely praised in South Koreaâs media  the US media seemed like a deer caught in the headlights from the first announcement of the breakthrough. Unclear how to respond to a possible outbreak of peace  the press immediately zeroed in on the section of Kimâs New Yearâs speech where he declared that his ânuclear forces are capable of thwarting and counteringâ anything from the United States.  Kim  also reminded Washington that the ânuclear buttonâ is on  his  office desk âall the time.â
Although the Supreme Leader left out some of the harsh anti-US language heâs used in previous declarations  the implied threat became the story for nearly every US media outlet covering his New Yearâs speech. At CNN  for example  reporter Brian Todd went on the air to warn Wolf Blitzer that the prospect of talks was dangerous because it could mask a North Korean military attack during the Olympics. In some broadcasts  Kimâs offer to talk  and Moonâs quick endorsement  were barely mentioned.
 Kim âs reference to  his  nuclear arsenal also drew a typical response from President Trump.  He  took to Twitter to declare that  he   too  had a âbutton â but it was âmuch bigger & more powerfulâ than Kimâs.  His  childish taunt quickly led to speculation about  his  state of mind and fitness to be president  a topic that dominated the White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sandersâs first media briefing of the year.
Asked at a press briefing at Camp David about the potential for negotiations with Kim  he replied: âSure  I always believe in talking.â¦ absolutely I would do that.â Trump âappeared to be strongly indicating that he would join talks with North Korea after the high-level inter-Korean talks  if the conditions are right â South Koreaâs liberal Hankyoreh concluded.
In the lead-up to the talks in Seoul  the mood was close to jubilant. âHopes are high that inter-Korean relations will improve â Hankyoreh reported on January 4. âSince  Kim  delivered  his  New Yearâs address on Jan. 1  North Koreaâs actions have been completely aligned with the Southâs response.â
The pace was set early on by The New York Times  in a front-page story on January 1 posted literally hours after  Kimâs New Yearâs speech .  It  instantly became the leitmotif for media coverage throughout the week.
Behind Kimâs New Yearâs declaration âlies a canny new strategy to initiate direct talks with South Korea in the hope of driving a wedge into its seven-decade alliance with the United States â reported Choe Sang-Hun and David Sanger  the latter a recipient of dozens of US intelligence leaks about North Korea over the years.
In the Choe-Sanger article  the Times cited Robert Litwakâa senior vice president at the Woodrow Wilson Center for International Scholars who is well-known in Japan and Korea for his hard-right views on security issuesâto back its claim that Kim is seeking to âtake the side of the South Koreans  against President Trump.â He was then given a large block of space on the Timesâs January 3 op-ed page to spell out his grave concerns for the wayward South Koreans.
âWashington and Seoul should not take Mr. Kimâs bait â Litwak argued. âInstead  the North Korean offer should be put to the diplomatic test through a united Washington-Seoul front.â
Yet despite the clear signals of disapproval from US hard-liners   the Moon and Kim governments pressed on   saying  they  would soon embark on âworking-levelâ talks to discuss the details of the Northâs participation in the Olympics  the family visits  and âsolve bilateral issues among  themselves  without relying on outsideâ forces  according to the Joongang Daily.

SOLUTION:
no