TASK DEFINITION: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.
PROBLEM: Comment: "It does seem a little hypocritical for Dogwood to be complaining about Kinder Morgan playing a role in the B.C. election through its donations to the BC Liberals, when it is receiving money from the United States to fight for causes aligned with interests there. "
In one case, foreign interests donate money to advocacy groups.
In the other, foreign interests donate money to a political party whose members currently form the provincial government. 
Not even remotely equivalent, Gary, and tf. hardly hypocritical of Dogwood to complain about it.

SOLUTION: Non-obscene

PROBLEM: Comment: Was there this much outrage over Neil Abercrombie's infamous "Fn¢k You." letter back in 1978?

SOLUTION: Obscene

PROBLEM: Comment: The explains why Trudeau has such a low opinion of Canada and Canadians.

Trudeau and his entire party need to pack up and move to China.  They'll be much happier there, and we'll be much happier when they're gone.

SOLUTION:
Non-obscene