In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence can be inferred from the statement. Incorrect choices change the meaning in important ways or have details that are not mentioned in the statement. Indicate your answer as 1,2, or 3 corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.

[EX Q]: Statement: Much that was said about Japanese management style in the 1980s--with its supposed Zen focus and greater sense of process than outcome--was pure buncombe. Choices:  1. Much of the information about Japanese management was inaccurate. 2. The information presented on Japanese management has always been correct. 3. The information about Japaneese management in the 1990s was correct. 
[EX A]: 1

[EX Q]: Statement: Brunelleschi's design was never completed but the interior preserves the spatial clarity of his Corinthian-capitaled colonnades. Choices:  1. Construction was underway for 30 years, but stalled when Brunelleschi died. 2. Brunelleschi's completed design can be seen in its original condition today. 3. Construction was never completed on Brunelleschi's design.
[EX A]: 3

[EX Q]: Statement: they ought to get it for killing a civilian just as easily as a policeman yeah i agree i don't know i heard something on the news the other night they were talking about Choices:  1. Killing a policeman should get someone more punishment than killing a civilian. 2. There should be no difference in punishment for killing a policemen or a civilian. 3. I think that both should be subject to capital punishment.
[EX A]:
2