We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

Meaning that a countless number of magazines capable of holding more than 10 round of ammunition had immunity and couldn't be touched by the bill.
Valid

Indeed, the right to keep and bear arms���which we have explained pre-existed, and therefore was preserved by, the Second Amendment���was subject to restrictions at common law.
Valid

It goes further to suggest we should endorse this action���that our response should be to reward the government for this behavior by surrendering the right it now claims to have made irrelevant.

Valid