instruction:
In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
question:
Comment: I find it almost comical that some people are actually tying to convince the Residents that taking half of the PFD is being done in an effort to SAVE the PFD. The fact of the matter is that the very same Republican led Government that squandered our oil revenue, and placed the state in this position, did so fully intending to try and get their greedy hands on the PFD. There has been no real effort to correct the give away of Alaska's money to non-producing oil companies. This gave them what they have been looking for for years, a way to get at the PFD. Demand side economics says that the more disposable income that each individual household has , the healthier the overall economy will be. Pushing the supply side agenda simply moves the money to the top so it can "trickle down ". It is a scam plain and simple. The only accomplishment will be the theft, once again, of millions of dollars from state residents. Greed motivates this sham of a state Government, and not the economy.
answer:
Agree


question:
Comment: Perhaps these Doctors should re-examine the Hippocratic Oath. I don't recall it saying that their first duty is to how much money they can deduct from their taxes. They may also want to consider that one of the major reasons the US is now on the verge of falling apart is that the wealthy in that country refuse to pay their fair share of taxes. That has meant that the wealth redistribution necessary to maintain popular support for the system has started to fail, contributing to the rise of a quasi-fascist candidate like Donald Trump.
answer:
Disagree


question:
Comment: Would you hire someone with anti capitalism views to run an investment firm? The PM did not label her a bigot, etc. It is simply a matter of being fit for a job which she is clearly not.
answer:

Disagree