Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.

Example Input: "City attorney Bill Falsey said Tuesday that Anchorage police are unable to provide services past McHugh Creek".  My understanding is that DPS decided decades ago that all law enforcement officers are certified by the state, so therefore jurisdictions are irrelevant.  Remember the (TS)AIA cop who chased the kid all the way from the airport to Indian and killed him?  I'm sure that line at McHugh Creek really won't matter to APD if push comes to shove.
Example Output: No

Example Input: First off, it's not a theory: a vote not cast for Hillary is a vote for Trump. Period.
Hillary is a strong supporter of health care: she brought the issue to the fore years ago where it remained.
Women's rights: she's been a champion of equal pay and other issues (Planned Parenthood) for decades.
African-Americans overwhelmingly support her. Do you know why?
Minimum wage: $12. Not as high as Bern, but a large improvement.
Gun control: a decades' long supporter of toughening laws.
Immigration: supporter of Obama.
Education: platform calls for free community college; debt-free public university attendance through $2500/year credit.
So, I don't know what you mean about her progressive ideas and credentials. Not as far as Bern, right, but a MASSIVE, MASSIVE difference from Trump.
Please, read this and learn a bit about her: http://www.pbs.org/newshour/updates/hillary-clinton-believe-candidate-stands-10-issues/
Example Output: No

Example Input: Good shooting? 5 shots? Sounds like spraying lead and hoping it hits something to me -- far from what I'd call good shooting.

And as I've said before, if everybody shot every dog who came running at them barking the bodies would be piled high and friendly neighbors few and far between.
Example Output:
Yes