We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Input: Consider Input: Sent1: If we continue to allow the death penalty, we are no better than the murderers and rapists that we punish with the death penalty.
 Sent2: If we fail to execute murderers, and doing so would in fact have deterred other murders, we have allowed the killing of a bunch of innocent victims.

Output: Not similar


Input: Consider Input: Sent1: Life incarceration will never let him kill again, and its cheaper.
 Sent2: Life imprisonment without parole is more effective than execution, and it is cheaper.

Output: Similar


Input: Consider Input: Sent1: Oh I'm not saying that the govenrment should do away with the death penalty on these grounds, I'm saying that Christian people should oppose it, you said it yourself.
 Sent2: I suppose you could say "well it keeps them from harming society" but so does the death penalty.


Output: Not similar