We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

Q: And what Hitler did was change Germany gun control laws to explicitly disarm the jewish population based on religion.

A: Valid
****
Q: To argue that there are more ethical defensive means than firearms is stupid in my opinion.

A: Valid
****
Q: See Subaru's posts if you want real false dichotomy, suggesting that we either ban guns or we're inhuman scum that's fit to be wiped off the face of the planet.

A:
Valid
****