In this task, you will be presented with a context from an academic paper and a question separated with a 
. You have to answer the question based on the context.

Input: Consider Input: . While automated evaluation metrics like ROUGE measure lexical similarity between machine and human summaries, humans can better measure how coherent and readable a summary is. Our evaluation study investigates whether tuning the PG-net model increases summary coherence, by asking evaluators to select which of three summaries for the same document they like most: the PG-net model trained on CNN/DM; the model trained on student reflections; and finally the model trained on CNN/DM and tuned on student reflections. 20 evaluators were recruited from our institution and asked to each perform 20 annotations. Summaries are presented to evaluators in random order. Evaluators are then asked to select the summary they feel to be most readable and coherent. 
 Question: Who were the human evaluators used?

Output: 20 evaluators were recruited from our institution and asked to each perform 20 annotations


Input: Consider Input: In addition to the majority baseline, we also compare our results with a lexicon-based approach. For experimental results, we report majority baseline for each language where the majority baseline corresponds to a model's accuracy if it always predicts the majority class in the dataset. 
 Question: what are the baselines?

Output: majority baseline lexicon-based approach


Input: Consider Input: We designed 3 evaluation sets: (1) Base Set (1,264 samples) held out from the simulated data. (2) Augmented Set (1,280 samples) built by adding two out-of-distribution symptoms, with corresponding dialogue contents and queries, to the Base Set (“bleeding” and “cold”, which never appeared in training data). (3) Real-World Set (944 samples) manually delineated from the the symptom checking portions (approximately 4 hours) of real-world dialogues, and annotated as evaluation samples. 
 Question: How do they select instances to their hold-out test set?


Output: 1264 instances from simulated data, 1280 instances by adding two out-of-distribution symptoms and 944 instances manually delineated from the symptom checking portions of real-word dialogues