Given a document, find the main entity about whom the author is writing. Write the full name if mentioned in the text. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].
--------
Question: Dillon Vatick  said  he  couldn't believe  it  as  he  shopped online recently for next year's health plan.  Vatick  is a computer science student who lives in Jacksonville  Florida.  He  qualified for a monthly subsidy of about $280 and  he  found a bronze plan with a premium of less than $270.
"My health care is technically free " said  Vatick .
"Was it too good to be true?"  he  said  he  asked  himself  when  he  first saw the numbers. "Sure enough  it wasn't."
 Vatick  said bronze plans aren't for everybody because they come with very high deductibles. But  he 's in  his  20s and figures  he  won't be going to the doctor much.  He  said  he  had been paying about $80 a month for coverage.

Answer: Dillon Vatick


Question: The good news for Indy is that the only coaching vacancy still looks pretty attractive â if  Andrew Luck  is healthy.
 Luck   meanwhile  continues to be the big question as  he  rehabs from last January's surgery for a partially torn labrum in  his  throwing shoulder.
Some believe McDaniels' sudden change of heart was related to doubts about  Luck 's health.
On Wednesday  though  he attempted to alleviate lingering concerns about  Luck  while acknowledging the franchise quarterback still hasn't thrown a football since returning from Europe late last year.
"At this point  we feel very strongly that  Andrew  is in a good place.  He  doesn't need surgery " Ballard said. "I have not gotten that from the two doctors that  he 's seen here after the season.  His  strength is good.  He 's working on  his  throwing motion and  he 's working on  his  arm speed right now.  He  has not picked up a football  but  he  is throwing balls  working on arm speed.
" He 's going to do everything right to get  himself  ready to play and I'm very confident   he 's very confident  that  he 's going to come back and prove a lot of people wrong " Ballard added.

Answer: Andrew Luck


Question: Itâs not as if fake news in America came into existence alongside the tide known as the Trump presidencyâthe hucksters  foreign propagandists  conspiracy theorists  and fabricators have always been hereâbut if ever there was a year when purposefully misleading or false stories hit their stride  2017 might have been it.  We  were told that an ISIS leader was captured at a US airport  and that Shariah law was instituted in Utah and other states. A study found that 25 million votes for Hillary Clinton were âcompletely fraudulent â and the Las Vegas massacre was carried out by antifa  or ISIS  or the Illuminati  or somehow all three. The lies went on and on  picking up where 2016âs catalogue of nonsense left off. (Remember Hillary Clintonâs child sex trafficking ring run out of a pizzeria  or Sarah Palin banning Muslims from âenteringâ her daughter? How about Alec Baldwin dying  and Trump winning the electoral vote and the popular vote?)
But now  we âre at the dawn of a fresh year  privy to the forces that seek to sow confusion and outrage. Can American society overcome the fake news phenomenon?
Wellâ¦ âThereâs probably a strong case to be made that  we  are chemically addicted to fake news â says  Amy Webb   an author and futurist who founded the Future Today Institute. âWhen youâre seeing your angers and fears and anxieties being validated externally  you get a shot of dopamine.â Thinking about the upcoming year and beyond   she  says   we  may have âa huge problem on  our  hands.â And though the propaganda is coming at  us  from all directionsâfrom Kremlin-backed misinformation campaigns and Twitter troll armies to publicity hounds and political malcontentsâfalling for it  and spreading it  is to some degree our own fault.
In the spring of 2017   Webb  wrote a piece for Mother Jones that detailed not only the manner of 21st-century fake news and the speed with which it travels  but also how we are all accomplices to its proliferation âas we click and repost without considering the storyâs source and its agenda.â  She  noted that the democratization of the internet back in the 1990s meant that âeveryone would get to participate regardless of their agendas.â Information became free and free-flowing. But  problematically  âwe didnât plan ahead as the internet matured â when consumers of information were left to contend with not only âhuman arbiters of factsâ but also code and algorithms that propel certain types of content to the fore  based on our own online behavior. Innocently sharing a cat video put out by Russia Today  a Kremlin-backed propaganda machine that elevates fringe âexpertsâ and attempts to sow distrust  means youâll see a lot more of their content in the future.
Complicating matters more is that in our politicized climate  the term fake news itself came to mean different things to different people. It had a literal meaning that  seemingly overnight  became a hashtag and an epithet to hurl at anything or anyone that one disagrees with. âIf we canât even come to some kind of convergence and talk about something as insidious and as threatening to our future as the spread of misinformationâotherwise known as fake news in the literal senseâthen donât we have sort of a catastrophically huge problem on our hands?â asks  Webb .
As someone who studies current and past trends to try to anticipate what the future may hold   Webb  likes to end these conversations with a reminder that  for however doomed things appear  âWe are not living in the middle of Westworldâthe future has not been preordained. There is something we can do in the year 2018 and beyond  and that is be smarter consumers of news.â

Answer:
Amy Webb