In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence can be inferred from the statement. Incorrect choices change the meaning in important ways or have details that are not mentioned in the statement. Indicate your answer as 1,2, or 3 corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.

Example Input: Statement: We see him taming an enraged elephant or appearing as the warrior Simhala attacking the Island of Ogresses, while his wife Rani, holding a mirror, languorously prepares her toilet with handmaidens holding her cosmetics. Choices:  1. The two people depicted were royalty in their time. 2. Simhala is pictured as controlling a wild elephant. 3. The woman is handling elephants while the man does his make up.
Example Output: 2

Example Input: Statement: Nor is Clinton's blend of realism and idealism necessarily corrupt. Choices:  1. Clinton's blend of realism and idealism is extremely corrupt. 2. The blend of realism and idealism portrayed by Clinton should be punished. 3. Clinton's blend of realism and idealism is fair.
Example Output: 3

Example Input: Statement: If you missed the link about the really big marriage penalty--the one created by the earned-income tax credit, click . Choices:  1. The earned-income credit caused a tax penalty for married people. 2. The earned income tax credit allows married people to not pay taxes at all. 3. Married people pay more in taxes.
Example Output:
1