In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Ex Input:
Comment: He needs to go back to "Robbery U".......he flunked the first course.

Ex Output:
Non-obscene


Ex Input:
Comment: Globe this is fucking ridiculous. Send her a year free subscription but tell her she cant post.

I thought your new process was supposed to clean this shit up.

Ex Output:
Obscene


Ex Input:
Comment: I love the rationalizations trying to say that the CPC fundraisers were different because the cost of entry was lower (eg: when Nigel Wright hosted a private fundraiser at his home for an Ontario PC candidate or when Dykstra hosted lobbyists in the private booth of the Skydome Owner, or Baird, or Raitt, or the multiple events starring Duffy and Harper).

So in other words, the Liberals are the high priced call girls while the CPC were the less expensive street walkers?     Is THAT the difference?

Face it - "cash for access" is a sensationalist way to describe fundraising when a politician attends their own fundraiser.     It's been going on for as long as politicians needed money and there is nothing inherently wrong with it.    Further, eliminating it doesn't solve one damn thing.

Ex Output:

Obscene