In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.
--------
Question: Sentence: John hired Bill to take care of him .
 Reason: The 'him' refers to john because You can't hire someone to take care of themselves. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

Answer: Correct


Question: Sentence: Jane knocked on the door, and Susan answered it. She invited her to come in.
 Reason: The 'She' refers to susan because Jane was outside the house already. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

Answer: Correct


Question: Sentence: If the con artist has succeeded in fooling Sam, he would have lost a lot of money.
 Reason: The 'he' refers to sam because of the way the con artist would have made his point to the other party. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

Answer:
Wrong