In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Example Input: Comment: Victimitis,
  The point is, all humans are liars, and they lie most when lying suits their interests. That's why, in all instances, regardless of gender, we must regard the claims of an individual as suspect, when those claims serve their interests and/or objectives such as custody of children etc.
Example Output: Non-obscene

Example Input: Comment: If you feel that the gains in gender equality (If they were gains and not just part of the culture before the revolution) negates the starvation, lack of basic luxuries freely obtainable in the west, loss of freedom and the reintroduction of slavery - the gulags were labour camps after all where people not only worked without wages in the worst conditions in the frozen tundra without adequate sustenance- then perhaps you should re-examine your priorities.  How many Soviet leaders were female?
Example Output: Non-obscene

Example Input: Comment: Oh ya, colonialism is the real problem in Africa. LOL. The only countries that have any development at all are British colonies. The British gifted them with judicial and parliamentary systems and you think colonialism is to blame? Without colonialism they have nothing. They'd still be living in huts. Well most actually still do. Keep blaming the white man for all of the worlds ills. LOL
Example Output:
Non-obscene