Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.

Example Input: It's a nice goal but the fact remains that no one has a viable plan to get to 100% renewables that can handle the base load at all times.  Unless the public is going to accept a brownout when the sun isn't shining and the wind isn't blowing we're going to need a reliable base load electrical generation capacity well into the future.
Example Output: No

Example Input: So an income tax isn't acceptable, but a 35% tax on the PFD is? Perhaps it looks attractive to you because the PFD to you is a bit of extra money, a nice little bonus to give yourself a treat. You have no clue that there are many households, mostly in the Bush, for whom the PFD is a large part of the yearly income. Cutting that income by 35% is going to mean less , food, fuel, clothing, all the little things that Mr. Olsen takes for granted. 

So once again we have a clueless, tone deaf, Republican more than willing to take from the poor to give to the rich.  It's high time for a change.
Example Output: Yes

Example Input: Bernie has been very consistent, he all about giving freebies to those that don't want to work for anything. He's the lazy peoples hero!
Example Output:
No