TASK DEFINITION: Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
PROBLEM: "Facts" can totally be racist. They can leave out important information, they can be gathered in questionable ways, they can be presented in a biased manner. To pretend like there is some impeachable "truth" and that somehow, magically, that truth helps you maintain your place of privilege is dangerous, but it's what the dominant group has always done to help them stay in power. You can call me a "social justice warrior" and a "progressive leftist" if that makes you feel better, but it doesn't make you any more right or any less bigoted.

SOLUTION: Yes

PROBLEM: I've already spoken to the "attack," but I cannot heal you (this is Eugene).
I regret causing you such obvious anguish and anger. Your initial response to my post, a good example of ad hominem, ignited it.

SOLUTION: No

PROBLEM: The oil corporations do not need the $630 million oil-tax credit program, because the Chief Executive Officer of Tesoro, Gregory Goff, received a salary of $23 million in 2015 and the Chief Executive Officer of BP, Bob Dudley, gave himself a pay package of $20 million.

SOLUTION:
No