In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: threat and non-threat. Threat is a statement that someone will be hurt or harmed, especially if the person does not do something in particular.

Input: Consider Input: Comment: So when do we put a bag over Trudeau's head for destroying white culture in Canada with Muslim and Chinese immigration??

Now this crap.
Hey Indians !!1

If you worked more, like the rest of us, Instead of sucking at the taxpayers teat every day - you wouldn't have time to fuss over who kicked your asses

Output: Threat


Input: Consider Input: Comment: Remember when Assange was a traitor and Republicans hated him? Remember when Republicans hated Comey? Yeah, we ALL do--except you.

Output: Non-threat


Input: Consider Input: Comment: Your description of Wheeler's response as "coy" is dishonest & misleading: it was straight-forward & honest. He's not going to take a stand on something he sees as divisive & points to work being done at the Leg as a better course. It's fine for voters to disagree with that, but setting it up with an unnecessary adjective is editorializing, not reporting.

Plus you take a single response to a single question, an incomplete response for that matter, and you do not put it into the context of anything else he's said. That's not just misleading; it's poor journalism. (And let's not even get into how bad the headline is.)


Output: Non-threat