Given a document, an entity and its sentiment towards the entity, verify if it is the correct sentiment towards the entity. Answer should be yes or no. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

[EX Q]: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Conor McGregor is Positive . Conor McGregor  has been warned  he  could be stripped of  his  UFC lightweight title if  he  doesn’t fight again until September  The Daily Mail reported.
 McGregor  has not fought in the cagefighting octagon since November 2016 and the division has been put on hold since.
UFC president Dana White revealed that  the 155-pound McGregor  planned to only make  his  comeback towards the end of the year – a move White thinks is unfair to the champion’s competitors.
Should  McGregor  be stripped of  his  lightweight belt  it would mark the first time that  he  has not held some form of title in the sport  Bleacher Report said.
Commenting on the fight  White said: “You do Khabib versus Tony  we’re working on that fight now. If and when  Conor  comes back   he  would get the first crack at the title.”
[EX A]: yes

[EX Q]: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Tina Brown is Positive . Former Vanity Fair editor Tina Brown couldn’t please everyone. In her timely new book  “The Vanity Fair Diaries ” she recalls a run-in with gossip legend Liz Smith  who died over the weekend at 94.
According to  Brown   Smith’s girlfriend Iris Love submitted a story about her trip up the Nile to Vanity Fair in 1985  shortly after  Brown  had started her new job.
“Trouble is  picture’s great  copy not  ” Brown  recalled. According to  Brown   31 at the time  she decided to run the piece anyway  but only after a heavy edit that she knew would not go over well with Smith. As expected  Smith “got on the horn to give me the full Texan bawl-out.”
In her new book  Tina Brown recounts a run-in with the late gossip great Liz Smith  seen here at an event in March. (Gary Gershoff/WireImage)
[EX A]: yes

[EX Q]: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Fox is Negative . Disney's purchase of 21st Century  Fox 's studio assets brings clarity to an industry facing a change in consumer habits. Disney is paying a steep price-- Fox  shareholders will receive 0.2745 DIS shares for each FOXA share and control about 25% of the combined company--with the acquired businesses carrying an equity value of $52 billion and an enterprise value of $66 billion.
As a studio  Fox  is in a clear slump  and it is difficult to see the  Fox  content moving the needle on filmed entertainment at the new Disney. Disney is about to release The Last Jedi  a surefire hit that I believe will outshine its predecessor  The Force Awakens  as the top-selling movie in terms of all-time global box office receipts. In contrast  Fox  has been unable to produce hits recently  with none of its films featuring in the 2017 global box office top 10 (Logan is currently #11.) It is clear that Disney CEO Bob Iger is looking for quantity over quality.
That's the key factor: As Disney looks to launch its own over-the-top network in 2019  having a critical mass of popular franchises is key. After the deal closes  Disney will control movie franchises such as Avatar  X-Men  Deadpool and the Fantastic Four. Just as importantly  Disney gains control of  Fox 's TV studios  which created The Simpsons and Modern Family.
So  that's the calculus here. The deal is clearly dilutive to DIS shareholders in the short-term. Disney's press release included management's forecast that the purchase of  Fox  assets will be "accretive to earnings before the impact of purchase accounting for the second fiscal year after the close of the transaction."
When there are that many weasel words in a guidance paragraph  an analyst knows that management is not confident on the financials of the acquired company. Also  Disney's projection of "at least $2 billion" in cost savings from  the Fox deal  tellingly does not include a time-frame. I think that's a stretch. If anything  I believe Disney will likely end up spending incremental dollars  not saving them  to try and grow the Sky and Star India businesses that were languishing in the Fox corporate family.
Obviously  though  for Disney  this deal  is about assets  not earnings per share. Currently there are five major studios globally  with Lionsgate and Paramount occupying what I would classify as strong second-tier positions. After  this deal   obviously  there will only be four first-time filed entertainment providers  and Warner Brothers Universal and Sony/Columbia will have to deal with an Evil Empire that will eventually control its own version of a Death Star  a direct-to-consumer network.
So  Netflix's dominance is challenged  and I believe that Netflix is the big loser in  the Disney-Fox deal . At 17.2x analyst consensus for 2018 EPS  Disney shares are not particularly expensive. Finally clinching  the Fox deal  (actual closure is expected by June 30th  2018) will allow Disney management to shift shareholder focus from the sinking ship that is ESPN to the high-quality stable of filmed entertainment properties that are controlled by the combined entity. Content is still king.
[EX A]:
no