We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

[EX Q]: You argue that people cannot be trusted with guns, because they might injure themselves in accidents (hence the 4.46 figure).
[EX A]: Valid

[EX Q]: The features listed would already prohibit the sale of firearms that various military and police organizations have certified as being suited for their uses after having passed rigorous safety and reliability tests.
[EX A]: Valid

[EX Q]: Where is it said that the right of the people to keep and bear arms is directly contingent upon service in the militia and that failure to comply will result in a loss of rights?
[EX A]:
Valid