instruction:
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
question:
Brian, thanks for very well written, but also disturbing, piece. You defend yourself very well against protestors and some iconic straw-man "the left" who accuse you, ironically, of believing what your candidate says he believes. 

Will your vote determined by some angry protestors and "the left?" I certainly don't call you racist, sexist, or ignorant. But I do ask, will you vote for a man who says what Mr. Trump says about Mexicans, Muslims, blacks, and women? Who ignores decades of foreign policy, and jumps to dangerous conclusions repeatedly? Who promises to deport 11 million people? Who would exclude immigrants on the basis of religious beliefs? You redefine him as "a fighter." Do you just disbelieve everything he says? 

And I'd join you, whole heartedly, in objecting to the name calling, polarizing, demeaning, common-enemy tactics of those protesters.  ... if you weren't using them to defend a man whose campaign has ridden those same tactics to unprecedented levels.
answer:
Yes


question:
How will she do that? How has Obama done that? I seem to recall that the US is producing more oil now than has decades. Thus, the low price/barrel of oil. What is destroying the energy industry in Alaska is greedy corporations that won't do anything without huge tax breaks and our politicians in Juneau that can't make a decision to save their lives. Liberate yourself from Trump talking points and you will do well.
answer:
No


question:
Sounds like they may have known each other.  Doubt police are releasing all the details.  Would also be interesting to know if he's a recent lower 48 transplant.
answer:

No