Given a document, an entity and its sentiment towards the entity, verify if it is the correct sentiment towards the entity. Answer should be yes or no. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].
--------
Question: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Boris JohnsonLabour is Negative . London (CNN) Britain's beleaguered Prime Minister Theresa May has been urged to sack  her Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson  over his handling of the Nazanin Zaghari-Ratcliffe case.
On Sunday both Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn and London Mayor Sadiq Khan called on May to fire  Johnson -- who has been under increasing pressure since Iranian state TV claimed that his statements on the plight of the British-Iranian woman imprisoned in Tehran on charges of espionage confirmed her guilt .
Writing in the Observer on Sunday  Corbyn took aim at  Johnson   calling for him to be relieved of his duties after "undermining our country" and "putting our citizens at risk."
Also on Sunday  the UK Foreign Office told CNN that  Johnson  had held a "constructive" conversation with Richard Ratcliffe  the husband of Zaghari-Ratcliffe.
 Johnson  has been on the defensive over the past week since being forced to correct remarks  he  made to a British parliamentary committee  when  he  said that Zaghari-Ratcliffe  who has been in jail since she was detained at Tehran airport in April 2016  had been teaching journalism during her visit to the country. Zaghari-Ratcliffe and her family have maintained that she was in Iran visiting family.
After  Johnson 's original comments  authorities in Iran filed further charges against Zaghari-Ratcliffe  prompting fears her five-year sentence could be extended. On Wednesday  Iranian state TV IRIB said  Johnson  amounted to an unintentional confession.
 Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson  is set to visit Iran before the end of the year.
In  his  article  Corbyn says that the "heartbreaking" case of Zaghari-Ratcliffe has left her future liberty in peril because of  Johnson 's "serial bungling."
In a blunt final paragraph  Corbyn added: "We've put up with him embarrassing and undermining our country through his incompetence and putting our citizens at risk for long enough. It's time for  Boris Johnson  to go."
Khan was similarly critical of  Johnson   his predecessor as mayor of London calling on him to "clarify the huge error he made" and help bring Zaghari-Ratcliffe back to the UK.

Answer: no


Question: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Alan Dershowitz is Negative . On Tuesdayâs broadcast of the Fox News Channelâs âAmericaâs Newsroom â Harvard Law Professor Alan Dershowitz stated Special Counsel Robert Mueller is âvery zealous.â He later added that Mueller wonât be content until he gets to President Trump or those âvery closeâ to him and this is the danger of special prosecutors.
 Dershowitz  said that both parties are guilty of arguing that everything they disagree with is criminal and this behavior started with Republicans during the campaign with Hillary Clinton and then continued by Democrats.
 Dershowitz  then recalled  his  experience with Mueller.  He  stated that  he  talked to Mueller about prosecutorial and FBI misconduct and Mueller stated âItâs a non-starter to talk to me about FBI misconduct or prosecutorial misconduct. Itâs a non-starter.  He  doesnât want to hear about that.  He  is in the business of protecting the FBI  protecting prosecutors  at all costs. I donât suggest  he âs unethical  but  he âs very zealous.â
 He  added that this makes Mueller âeffective at  his  job  but the job of a prosecutor is to do justice  not to get as many notches on his belt as possible.â
 Dershowitz  further stated Mueller is ânot going to be satisfied until  he  gets to the president  or people very close to  him . Thatâs the danger of a special prosecutor.â
 Dershowitz  also stated the tactic of finding someone to prosecute in order to get them to talk is âdangerousâ because people will âcomposeâ and make things up to get a better deal.  He  continued  âLook  if an ordinary person walked over to somebody and said  âUnless you give up your rights  Iâm going to have you criminally prosecuted â weâd call that extortion. But itâs allowed by prosecutors. And Iâve been railing against this for 53 years. now  Republicans agree with me. â¦ Which side are you on has become so important.â

Answer: no


Question: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Donald Trump Jr. is Negative . In August  Reuters first reported that the RNC was paying  Trump 's legal bills  which amounted to more than $230 000 that month.
The payments were made to  Trump 's outside legal team  which includes Dowd and Jay Sekulow.
Additionally   Trump 's reelection campaign paid more than $300 000 this year in bills to lawyers representing his son Donald Trump Jr.  according to public disclosures filed by the campaign. The campaign did not respond to a request for comment whether it will continue to pay for Trump Jr's legal expenses.
While previous presidential campaigns have used these funds to pay for routine legal matters such as ballot access disputes and compliance requirements   Trump  was the first U.S. president in the modern campaign finance era to use such funds to cover the costs of responding to a criminal probe  said election law experts.

Answer:
no