TASK DEFINITION: We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.
PROBLEM: Sent1: This is why I advocate explaining the costs of guns as much as possible, and fighting the gun lobby at every turn.
 Sent2: I am, however, suprised that gun rights advocates use this case to defend the right to own guns, because the case seems to imply the opposite, as stated by Tim.

SOLUTION: Not similar

PROBLEM: Sent1: The anti gun/gun control advocate way at dealing with deaths caused by guns is to limit the right to bear arms.
 Sent2: Talking about the right to bear arms with anti-gun/gun control advocates is like talking about civil rights with racist.

SOLUTION: Not similar

PROBLEM: Sent1: The numbers above tend to indicate that fewer gun-related homicides is a direct result of stricter gun control laws.
 Sent2: All that I point out is that Canada, which has very strict gun control laws, also has a much lower murder rate than does the USA.

SOLUTION:
Similar