We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

[EX Q]: Sent1: They never said anything about allowing bans on commonly owned firearms, or ammunition, or allowing for heinous restrictions that wouldn't be considered constitutional when applied to other rights.
 Sent2: Machine guns are not in common use so I see no reason to believe restrictions on them would be lifted based on the ruling.
[EX A]: Not similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: If today we were to ban guns all the law abiding citizens would give up their firearms and protection.
 Sent2: Gun bans simple ban law abiding citizens from having guns.
[EX A]: Similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: Criminals that do not obey gun control laws will be able to obtain guns and use them on the unarmed law-abiding citizens.
 Sent2: Gun control laws do not affect criminals because criminals do not obey these laws.
[EX A]:
Similar