In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

[EX Q]: Comment: And Kelly lied his well-decorated ass off during this “heartfelt” speech, dishonoring not only his son, but all other fallen service personnel
[EX A]: Sexual-explicit

[EX Q]: Comment: Come on Darin.  Did you really think you could run for an elected position and your past would never come up?  I could see past discretions like theft when you were a teenager/young man but masturbating in public when you were 29 years old as part of your 3rd conviction for public indecency?  Your past is a reflection of your character and your multiple thefts and public masturbation convictions make it very clear to me that you are not qualified for the position you sought after.
[EX A]: Sexual-explicit

[EX Q]: Comment: Total nonsense.  Just keep drinking that kool-aid, Rod!   

China is by far the world's largest C emitter, with its value growing linearly since 2000.  New coal plants continue to come online, air in the country is infamously unbreathable.  Reported emissions not worth the paper they are printed on (even though they are already horrible), as NYT uncovered they under-reported coal burning by 17%.  That 17% alone, Rod, is more C than Canada emits in a year.  

The huge 'agreement' by the USA and China is also worthless.  China never set a cap on its emissions, only that they would level off by 2030.  Say  what?  It's like Trudeau promising to balance the budget...someday.  

And don't give me the per capita argument.  Their per capita emissions are at or above the EU's mean.  So individual Chinese emit more C than the typical European.  And it's growing.
[EX A]:
Non-sexual-explicit