Categorize the comment on the basis of severe toxicity. If the comment is severely toxic output Yes, otherwise output No.

Example Input: Kill the PFD and end the welfare. No dividends in a broke economy.
Example Output: Yes

Example Input: The University owes the listeners of KWAX an explanation and an apology.  I cannot imagine KRVM or KLCC doing this - they are very transparent in this community. Despite their "ownership", the University of Oregon is acting like a bully in this case.  If you asked any of the listeners of KWAX if they ever expected this when they were contributing funds to support their "non-profit, listener supported" station, I'll bet the answer would be a resounding "no". Perhaps that is the UO plan - alienate the listeners. Even their responses to the reporter's questions were not transparent. I guess stations are no longer licensed to organizations as "public trustees." Those days are over.
Example Output: No

Example Input: Anita Thorne - A pervert, not a pathetic confused sexless idiot, but a  man on the sex fiend list looks forward to sharing your time together in the future in the restroom - and please bring your daughter, and her daughter.  And you can't keep him him out because he says he is a woman and you can't question that can you!  I have never seen so many naive people in my life.  And when the first 7 year is raped  in a restroom they will be crying the we caused it, not their stupid ideas of fairness.
Example Output:
Yes