Given a document and an entity the task is to select the author's sentiment towards the entity. Sentiments can be Positive, Neutral and Negative. Select Positive if the article expresses a positive view towards the given entity or praises its quality or skills. Select Neutral if the document expresses no clear view towards the entity or has equal amounts of positive and negative statements or expressing some fact/quote by someone else. Select Negative if the article expresses a negative view towards like harsh remarks, criticizing entities action/decision etc. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

[EX Q]: What is the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Mitt Romney ? Former presidential candidate Mitt Romney blamed the government for the wildfires burning through California and other Western states Thursday morning . 
-- Mitt Romney -LRB- @MittRomney -RRB- October 12 , 2017 . 
"Uncontrolled fires , loss of lives & property = failure of prime govt responsibility , underinvestment in helos , planes , personnel , systems ," Romney tweeted .
[EX A]: Negative

[EX Q]: What is the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Kirsten Gillibrand ? NEW YORK (AP) â A private equity executive and Republican Party fundraiser has announced that she's running for the U.S. Senate seat held by U.S. Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (KEER'-sten JIHL'-uh-brand)  a popular Democrat.
In it  Farley accuses  Gillibrand  of being a political opportunist more focused on advancing  her  career than serving the needs of New Yorkers.
 She  promises to bring "tax dollars back home and rebuild New York."
 Gillibrand 's spokesman says the senator is proud of  her  record and "looks forward to the opportunity of earning the privilege to continue serving New Yorkers for another term."
[EX A]: Neutral

[EX Q]: What is the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Cuomo ? This is more or less the situation faced by  Gov. Cuomo  with the Essential Plan  a form of Obamacare  that since 2016 has been providing free or low-cost health coverage to low-income New Yorkers. It currently has 710 000 enrollees.
 Team Cuomo  has chosen not to refuse the money or warn Washington about whatâs happening. Instead  theyâve gone with option C: sue the feds to keep the broken ATM running until someone gets it fixed or turns it off.
The surprising truth emerged last week  when the Empire Center obtained a state Department of Health memo being shared with insiders. It showed the Essential Plan running a hefty surplus  which  Cuomo  intends to use for plugging holes elsewhere in the state budget.
The situation is all the more surprising because the plan recently took a $1 billion cut to  its  federal funding  courtesy of a constitutional flaw in President Barack Obamaâs Affordable Care Act. Plus  the memo says the state has been overpaying the insurance companies who manage the benefit under contract with the state.
Worse is the  Cuomo  administrationâs plan to spend the surplus on other programs  such as subsidizing financially weak hospitals. Once the feds wake up to that diversion  theyâre liable to demand repayment â as state Senate Health Chairman Kemp Hannon (R-L.I.) warned last week at a budget hearing. If New York somehow wins its suit and claims another billion-plus dollars  it will be digging the hole even deeper.
 Cuomo  and  his  aides see New York as being under attack from Washington â on tax policy  immigration and other issues â and may feel that all is fair in political warfare. But the money theyâre trying to grab comes from taxpayers  not the President or Congress. Their gamesmanship with public funds gives the whole enterprise of government-funded health care a bad name.
 Better Cuomo  should drop the lawsuit  urge Congress to rewrite the funding formula and come fully clean about the Essential Planâs finances: Did it run a surplus before now? If so  what happened to the extra money? And why wasnât any of this made clear to the taxpaying public?
[EX A]:
Neutral