Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.

[Q]: There should be no excusing one's behavior due to abuse of alcohol, drugs, or any form of lunacy.
[A]: No


[Q]: I don't see any reference to "little lady".  Is that just a projection on your part?  The accusation of sexism seems really strained here.  I didn't catch any the first time and reading it again looking for it didn't catch any.

Is "Saucrestress" the extent of this charge? It's worth noting that traditionally "mistress" is the female equivalent of "master".  The feminist magazine Ms. uses an abbreviation for "mistress".

I get being a bit defensive.  I think the review could have gone into more detail about the differing styles of the pies and whether they were good for the styles. Certainly the review shows a modest preference for Pizza Jerk over Red Sauce. But the charge of sexism seems flimsy at best.
[A]: No


[Q]: Increase taxes on seniors and disabled veterans on top of doing away with college scholarships so that you don't have to do away with funding for boondoggle projects is so misguided. When Frank the Bank went after longevity bonuses his approval went into the crapper and never recovered. Go you heartless cretins go. Put the stake through your own cold and  empty hearts.
[A]:
Yes