Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.

Q: That's actually an awesome idea. We'll call it the idiot tax.

A: Yes
****
Q: The email sent to me showed your opening statement: ""The “natural” method is introducing chemicals to the soil." It is not. Prior to world war two, chemicals weren't used to raise fruits a..." this post is nowhere on the board, which means it was deleted. Why are you lying OldSoul? Now, to address this ridiculous nonsense, prior to WW2 farmers used chemicals for it is impossible to grow any plant without chemicals. Perhaps a remedial 6th grade science course is in order. I'd also suggest you read http://www.forbes.com/forbes/welcome/

A: Yes
****
Q: Mahalo, Todd, for again sharing the best of yourself. Your pain is our pain, and together we can indeed make good from this. The first step, I must note even as we mourn, is to acknowledge that your subhead, "The Enemy Isn't Religion, It's Homophobia," is off target, pun intended. The enemy is a vast group of Americans who support the sale of guns to crazy people. Without guns, the murderers in Newtown, Aurora, Charleston and now Orlando would have done ... what? Thrown rocks? Thrusted knives? Made bombs? I doubt it. They would have done nothing but stew in their own vile bile. Kids, worshippers, co-workers, LGBT partiers: The crazies are equal-opportunity killers, and to focus on their targets, their motives or anything other than their means is to sidestep the truth.

A:
Yes
****