We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Example Input: Sent1: I'm not saying that a child's life is worth more than an adults, I'm saying if they killed any one they forfeit their life, because they in return lose what they took from someone else.
 Sent2: Like I said, if the person isn't convicted, then they will not be murdered in the electric chair, or by lethal injection.
Example Output: Not similar

Example Input: Sent1: What is the REASON behind "an eye for an eye" justice?
 Sent2: An eye for an eye won't make the whole world blind if the person never took the eye in the first place.
Example Output: Similar

Example Input: Sent1: Not to mention that the death penalty is more costly than simple life in prison in both money and time.
 Sent2: The court time is not inevitable, otherwise there wouldn't be an argument as to the death penalty being more expensive than life imprisonment.
Example Output:
Similar