Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.

Q: This is how you prime the political pump.  You had to read 2/3 down the page to find out what was in the bill.  I'm not persuaded that any of this is going to stick.  Dermot, do some of your stealth digging around and find out what is really going on.  Sounds like all the state is going to get is a stretched out Big Oil tax credit with a little cut to make is appear that Big Oil is taking a hit when they're not.

A: Yes
****
Q: Wait, you can't have your own dog run loose in your own yard now? The dog never bit any one right? You are totally missing the point you cannot have some random guy popping off rounds pointed towards someones home  and in a neighborhood, everytime they feel scared.

A: Yes
****
Q: Three quarters of the LAC received campaign donations from Mark Pfeffer or his employees during the timeframe that the LIO lease was 'negotiated'.  Is yours in this list?http://midnightsunak.com/2015/11/02/records-show-pfeffer-gave-heavily-to-lio-decision-makers/

To try to paint Pfeffer as some sort of victim here is utter BS.  To try to pretend that any of those corrupted legislators, who voted on this deal after receiving money from the owner, have one shred of ethics remaining is also BS.

Early voting starts October 24th.

A:
No
****