Given a document, an entity and its sentiment towards the entity, verify if it is the correct sentiment towards the entity. Answer should be yes or no. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

Ex Input:
Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Jonathan Swift is Negative . Jonathan Swift  we need you more than ever.
This week marks the 350th birthday of the brilliant Irish writer  born Nov. 30  1667. That we know of  Swift  at all is one of the sweetest fortunes of literary history.  His  father died of syphilis before Jonathan was born. A wet nurse whisked him to England for three years. He depended on the generosity of an uncle. He was almost killed by a mail bomb. But despite those precarious turns   Swift  became a poet  a priest  a political operator and  of course  the greatest satirist in the English language.
The longevity of  Swift ’s work is a testament to its potency because no genre fades as quickly: Satires are the cut flowers of literature. Time wilts their wit  fading their bright colors like old political cartoons that poke fun at fat cats we no longer recognize. (Voltaire adored Samuel Butler’s 1663 mock heroic poem “Hudibras ” but try reading it now without footnotes.)
[Jonathan Swift: Not (entirely) the misanthrope you thought you knew]
W.B. Yeats knew what he was talking about when he said of  Swift   “Imitate him if you dare.”
Consider the remarkable persistence of “A Modest Proposal ” published anonymously in 1729.  Swift ’s ironic phrase is such a hardy part of our language that it’s easy to forget how unlikely it is that we’d still be referring to a 3 000-word political pamphlet almost 300 years later. Originally titled “A Modest Proposal for Preventing the Children of Poor People From Being a Burden to Their Parents or Country  and for Making Them Beneficial to the Public ” the essay burns with rage at a privileged class willing to ignore and rationalize human suffering. Although the plight of starving Irishmen may be unimaginable to us today  the centuries have done nothing to mute  Swift ’s savage indignation.  He  still sounds as timely as last night’s “Daily Show.”
If you haven’t read “A Modest Proposal” since high school  look it up again and be astounded. Speaking in the voice of a perfectly reasonable bureaucrat   Swift  begins by describing the piteous state of beggars and their children “all in rags  and importuning every passenger for an alms.” In response to this “deplorable state ”  he  announces a solution  “having no other motive than the publick good of my country  by advancing our trade  providing for infants  relieving the poor  and giving some pleasure to the rich”:
Much of Swift’s essay is taken up with various statistics and logistical explanations  a hellacious spreadsheet of infant flesh to lay out the case for utilizing 100 000 children nursed to approximately 28 pounds each. In those well-modulated sentences   Swift  washes individuals and their pain away. As John Stubbs writes in his recent biography   Swift  possessed an “unequalled capacity to endow a ludicrous line of argument with an air of steadfast reason.” The bloody solution of “A Modest Proposal” is easy to laugh off as a bit of grotesque hyperbole  but the real horror of the essay remains its bland  bureaucratic tone — the same sterile language of accounting that justified American slavery  the Holocaust or any scheme that slices human lives into the columns of a ledger.
If politicians haven’t changed their menu much in 300 years  the rest of us still face the same risk of indigestion. Remember that “Gulliver’s Travels” ends with the intrepid narrator isolated and disgusted. Orwell assumed that Gulliver reflected his creator’s morose character and claimed that  Swift  suffered from a “general hatred of humanity” stoked by a perverse obsession with mankind’s sins and weaknesses. Stubbs argues that the image of  Swift  as a “misanthropic monster” is not entirely fair  but Gulliver’s fate is instructive  nonetheless.
Now that we’re all strident critics trading the day’s outrages across Twitter and the dining room table  how are we to avoid being sickened by our own bitter indignation? The bile in a satirist’s mind must be balanced with hope  or the whole enterprise is doomed. Surely   Swift  wouldn’t have bothered to poke fun at cruelty  incompetence and hypocrisy unless  he  believed  on some level  that such scalding exposure could awaken a better nature.
On  his  350th birthday  it’s good to remember that despair is the satirist’s temptation and the citizen’s poison.

Ex Output:
no


Ex Input:
Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Boyle is Neutral . The family was rescued on Thursday after Pakistani security forces ambushed their captors. The family left Pakistan for an undisclosed location  according to US officials  after  Boyle  refused to board a US transport plane over concerns about  his  background.
 Boyle  was formerly married to Zaynab Khadr  the older sister of Omar Khadr  a former Guantanamo Bay detainee  and the son of a prominent Al-Qaeda financier. Omar Khadr â then only 15 years old â was captured by US forces following a firefight that left a US Army Sergeant dead in 2002.
Coleman gave birth to three children in captivity  and  Boyle  delivered at least one with a flashlight in his mouth before captors brought them "all [their] postpartum needs."
 Boyle  says  he  tried to "play Beautiful Life" for  his  kids  referencing the 1997 Italian film "Life is Beautiful" about a father who tries to convince  his  son that the concentration camp they are both in during WWII is just pretend
 Boyle  says the last thing  he  heard from  his  captors while the family was in the trunk of a car during a firefight was "kill the hostages." The captors  however  were killed by Pakistani forces before they could follow through
Editor's note: The quote about the couple's children seeing their mother defiled was initially misattributed to  Joshua Boyle . The quote was in fact from  his  wife Caitlan Coleman.

Ex Output:
yes


Ex Input:
Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Fidji Simo is Neutral . âItâs a big priority for us to bring people closer together around meaningful content and the people who are meaningful to them â Facebookâs VP of video product  Fidji Simo  tells me. âCreators are right at the intersection of everything we think is pretty unique about Facebook.â
âThe idea was there to give them a one-stop-shop for all the functionality to manage their presence on the go â  Simo  explains about the Creator app  which breaks down into four parts.
This bundle of tools lets users add intros  outros and custom emoji reactions to their live broadcasts. Creators go on Facebookâs site  upload an intro like a theme song or welcome  and an outro like a call to follow them across social media. Those can then be enabled in the Creator app so they play at the start and end of the broadcast.  Simo  notes that â[Creators] were saying Live is cool because itâs raw and authentic  but theyâd like to be able to introduce every time what their show is about or what the theme is about.â
Graph frames let makers add a pretty border to their videos for a more immersive feel. And custom reactions let creators replace one of the six default âhaha â ââangryâ or âwowâ alternatives to the standard âLikeâ with a graphic of their choice. That could tie in with the theme of their broadcast or personality. For example   Simo  says feel-good video star Markian could add an especially toothy smile reaction to entertain his fan club group on Facebook  the #SmileSquad.

Ex Output:

yes