In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: threat and non-threat. Threat is a statement that someone will be hurt or harmed, especially if the person does not do something in particular.

Input: Consider Input: Comment: Floyd received a ticket because the police lost face; that's it. If he was speeding, the police need to have him on radar some other accepted method to actually track his speed, and then it's their choice if they issue him a ticket for speeding. The police officer has to actually see him driving recklessly as well, and I am pretty sure the officer was not chasing Floyd and the car thief at the same time; he probably came after the fact and issued him the citation. It will be interesting to hear the officer lie under oath come the court date. Meanwhile, the DA is thinking of every angle to get this hardened threat to society to just pay the ticket and throw every resource at him to fold like a cheap suit.

Output: Non-threat


Input: Consider Input: Comment: Yes. A "Prayer for the Faithful" at Mass should include:
"That our children be spared the horrors of a pre-Vatican 2 religious education. Lord, hear us".

Output: Non-threat


Input: Consider Input: Comment: "They saw through it all" are you talking about the majority or just those that voted for Trump? Trump tweets: I will be asking for a major investigation into VOTER FRAUD, including those registered to vote in two states, those who are illegal and..even, those registered to vote who are dead (and many for a long time). Depending on results, we will strengthen up voting procedures!. Trump claims 3-5 million illegally voted for Hillary.  Another promise another lie.  You got one big Hillary Hack-a-thon going on. With all this information you could write a book. If your real lucky you may get asked to bare witness.


Output: Non-threat