Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.

Q: Gee, a 3 and 1/2 "minute" working session in the Senate.  Mr Senate President, I would agree with you and your totally arrogant and idiotic statement.  The People of this State gave all of you lazy puds 90 days to get er done and yet you totally ignore it!  Now all efforts at anything have stopped because the House is playing politics.  Yes the issue is important, but if the steak isn't done, you can still eat a salad while you wait!  Or you can mow the lawn, anything but suck out of the trough and whine!

$12,500 per day?  Flying home for the weekend and not getting back for work on Monday?  In the real working world you would be Fired!  You in Juneau have become as big a joke as our National Congress.

I suggest another voter initiative, one which would stop all per diem after a 90 day session!  Another option would be sequestering all legislators in a motel 6 until the job is done.  Bread and water only!  Disgusting!

A: Yes
****
Q: Gerald,  you should be exterminated from Alaska.  go on, pilgrim....leave our beautiful state and leave the bears alone.

A: Yes
****
Q: Something subtle in the coverage here that has concerned our campaign, is that the RG's efforts to appear "fair," with candidate's excerpted statements that serve the RG's need for a storyline, haven't been forthcoming with much detail on the candidate's differences.  My campaign is dependent on public awareness of my desire to light the SUB fibre network to get Springfield's residents inexpensive/superfast internet, and my intent to aggressively intervene in the funding crisis in the schools. Yet, with the cancellation of all 7 proposed candidate forums, even the RG article 4-18 decrying "lack of debate" has little of substance that'd distinguish me or any opposition here, nor hold accountable an incumbent's record.  People deserve to not just 'hear' there are issues, they deserve to vote on the actual  issues themselves.  This sort of "psuedo-fairness" compromises a journalistic standard and uncritically assumes that all positions are equal without any elements accountable to facts.

A:
No
****