The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the no-need strategy, otherwise output No. no-need is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used when a participant points out that they do not need an item based on personal context such as suggesting that they have ample water to spare. no-need can directly benefit the opponent since it implies that the item is up for grabs.

[EX Q]: Context: 'I think we will need more extra food than that.  How about the reverse, I get 2 food and 1 water and you get 1 food and 2 water.' 'I could do that if I could then get 2 packages of wood as well because it's been bitterly cold this time of year at night in the Alleghenies.' 'That sounds fair.  So I would get 2 food, 1 water, and 1 firewood.'
Utterance: 'Yes.  That's mighty kind of you and I'm glad we both got what we needed.'
[EX A]: No

[EX Q]: Context: 'Hi how are you today? ' 'am fine and you?' 'I am good. Do you have any preferences on which items you would like most?'
Utterance: 'yes i really need a high amount of water and food.i have firewood in excess'
[EX A]: Yes

[EX Q]: Context: 'I really don't want to be without water, how about 2 water and 2 firewood for the 3 packages of food?' 'I just want to make sure I understand you I get 2 waters and 2 firewood and 0 food. ' 'That's right. Since you would be getting food from your sister, while I am camping alone, you would be getting more food pretty soon. '
Utterance: 'umm. I think the best and fair deal is a complete swap of water for food and you get 2 fire wood. '
[EX A]:
No