We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Example Input: Sent1: We shouldn't just kill someone if they commit a crime.
 Sent2: If it must be, then we shall find a way to improve these peoples habits, not kill them because they aren't 'like us'.
Example Output: Similar

Example Input: Sent1: There are multiple possible reasons for having a criminal justice system: deterring potential offenders, punishing actual offenders, rehabilitating offenders, removing offenders from the general population to prevent further criminality, avenging the victims of crime.
 Sent2: And the purpose of the death penalty is not to punish, but to deter further crime.
Example Output: Not similar

Example Input: Sent1: Others have said that the death penalty is biblically wrong.
 Sent2: If there was another factor, then there would have already been arguments against this study using other studies produced by the opponents of the death penalty to proved this theory wrong.
Example Output:
Not similar