Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.

Q: of all the op-ed letters submitted it's amazing how the most ridiculous nonsense is usually published.

A: No
****
Q: So. the US Congress passed a law in response to a US Supreme Court decision which they did not like and the President signed it or it wouldn't be in effect. 

That does not make them perjurers, bigots,  racists or fraudulent.  It makes them politicians, arguably a  low class of critter, but ranting and name calling won't change their legal act to ones which you might approve.

Opium was used extensively in this country until about the same time and it and its derivatives were also banned during the same time frame, and for more racist reasons that marijuana.

A: No
****
Q: Since the brain doesn't fully mature until age 25 it is confounding to understand the other previously made decions, especially military service and voting age. Common sense, a litte known practice tells us there should be consistency and it SHOULD be higher. Tobacco, alcohol, military and voting 22 years of age. Driving, 18 years unless work permit at 16. Of course that would be too much to hope for...maybe 21 years for tobacco, alcohol, military and voting would do for now.

A:
No
****