We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Input: Consider Input: Sent1: I think the death penalty should only be used when there is undeniable proof against the suspect.
 Sent2: To summarize, I think the death penalty should be used, but only in extreme cases.

Output: Similar


Input: Consider Input: Sent1: In all honesty im glad i am not someone who has to decide murder as punishment for someone who has committed crimes.
 Sent2: So, when someone gets the death penalty, they chose their own fate by committing the crime.

Output: Not similar


Input: Consider Input: Sent1: by committing to the idea that someone deserves to die, you are committing to the revenge side of human nature, not the idea of punishment for crimes committed.
 Sent2: Some crimes are so heinous that the person who committed the crime deserves to die: I would only agree to this if the execution erased the crime that was committed in the first place.


Output: Not similar