Categorize the comment on the basis of toxicity. If the comment is toxic (harmful, malicious, derogatory, threat, insult, identity attck, etc.) output Yes, otherwise output No.

[EX Q]: You forgot McDonald, and the newer reasoning in Caetano.
http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/15pdf/14-10078_aplc.pdf
[EX A]: No

[EX Q]: Silly, it is because you do not have science behind the big wind in your sails. So if you have both a penis and vagina is your choice a "you" pick? Did you know that if God created humans he made a lot of humans with some major differences in designs. Check out the Vrolik Medical Museum in Amsterdam, they have an extensive collection of how God played around with his human design and should point out to humans that all humans are not created equal that there is no cutter design that God uses in his works. So having a set of genitals that does not match to the sex that you feel you are is by no means out of God's creative genius. For the sort of folks who are not deeply religious substitute "nature" for "God".
[EX A]: Yes

[EX Q]: I'm from Alaska and Idaho, and your damn right I'd shoot!!! Why don't you go bail Codey out and be his third party since you feel so sorry for him... Let him in your house and on your property!!! Maybe you can shoot eachother and save us tax payers some money.
[EX A]:
Yes