In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Q: Comment: I was so excited to eat at Mi Mero Mole until I found out that the owner, Nick Zukin, was racist and so dismissive of Black Lives Matter.

I'm grateful that this very real issue with Saffron has brought much more about Portland businesses into the light and caused folks to dig deeper into who they support.

Smart business owners should do the right thing and use this opportunity to sympathize with the community (who is rightfully outraged) with the result of likely earning that community's support and winning  them over to their business (much like Ristretto Roasters did) rather than PUBLICLY expressing support and shooting themselves in the proverbial foot. It doesn't look like Nick Zukin is that kind of business owner. I suppose some people just like to commit business-suicide.

It's amazing how arrogant business owners like Sally and Nick are to think that Portland has enough racists or racist-sympathizers to keep their restaurants afloat.

A: Non-sexual-explicit
****
Q: Comment: Yeah some "choice" I have to make, I still can't believe it's come down to this. Sign of the times I guess. In reality my vote here in Oregon is even less than meaningless since we aren't a battleground state and will go Democratic come h*ll or highwater. I suppose I could vote for one of the minor parties as a protest vote, although deep down I know that pigs will fly before they ever sniff the WH.  A "better tomorrow"? Hope does spring eternal.

A: Non-sexual-explicit
****
Q: Comment: A lot of people felt the same way under the Obama regime. Luckily cool heads prevailed and it passed. There is no need for violence. All you'll accomplish by throwing this bum out is getting some other bum promoted.

A:
Sexual-explicit
****