In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

Comment: Churches are attacked in Mississauga.  Do we need a Christianphobia resolution?  Jews are attacked in Montreal and at York University.  Do we need a Judeaophobia resolution?  Why is Islam so darn special that it needs a specific resolution?
Identity-attack

Comment: The link to the post by the Democrat activist has "magically" disappeared. I guess she's forgotten that the Internet is forever and that screen shots of her petty screed will be available. How mean-spirited can you get when the VP's family has a small private outdoor wedding in a park-AS DO THOUSANDS OF OTHER COUPLES-and you decide because you don't like the Marines or the groom's Dad to be a nasty, vindictive witch. And you can spell that any way you want. From what I've witnessed locally, online and via public posts by a slate of Democrat talking heads from Pelosi to Waters to Jackson to Wilson-Democrats are simply sore losers who can't get over the fact that Hillary was disliked by many people, including many women.
Non-identity-attack

Comment: hmmm, we do have plenty of example of armed black men in public.    It also clear the market for guns in some black urban communities are thriving and purchases made with little problem or objection.

We don't know each other, but do you think the black community would support tighter gun control or not?   I've heard a lot of white folks on the topic, almost no black input - which is a big problem considered the level of violence in Some primarily black urban commuties.

Identity-attack