We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Example Input: Sent1: Some passionately assert that the Amendment protects an individual's right to own guns.
 Sent2: Unless the second amendment is recognised as an individual right, and given the full protection of law as other rights are, there is nothing to say that a law could not be passed tomorrow banning all weapons in this country.
Example Output: Not similar

Example Input: Sent1: There's no evidence to prove the believe that when guns are less available, less criminals will be armed than if guns were more readily available.
 Sent2: I have a better theory as to why there's a supposed smaller availability of guns to criminals in the UK; because there are less people and obviously fewer guns were ever made or imported to begin with.
Example Output: Not similar

Example Input: Sent1: Criminals will always find ways to get around gun laws which is why there are a lot less criminals who own and use guns in places like the UK and Australia.
 Sent2: Before the Brady Law any criminal could walk into a gun store and easily purchase a gun.
Example Output:
Not similar