We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

[EX Q]: When we factor in the usefulness of guns for self-defense against violent criminals, it's clear that normal gun owners are at less risk of criminal victimization.
[EX A]: Valid

[EX Q]: Students and teachers in schools need to defend themselves, too... Like laws banning guns in sensitive places, concealed carry laws are consistent with Heller���s self-defense rationale only because the Court claimed to limit the arms right to the home.
[EX A]: Valid

[EX Q]: The Second amendment is designed to give us the tools for rebellion, and to shoot those politicians as we may see fit, but does not provide any kind of right to do so.
[EX A]:
Valid