We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Input: Consider Input: Sent1: Since there are many people sentenced for murder that are actually innocent (~10% who were sentenced to death who were proved innocent in appeal), you would be causing a lot more innocent deaths than you would be saving.
 Sent2: You need to find lots more for the death penalty to save more lives than innocents that have been executed by it.

Output: Similar


Input: Consider Input: Sent1: Without fear of punishment, some people cannot be controlled.
 Sent2: I suppose that, for most people, having to serve a life sentence without parole would already ruin their life enough that any who would be detered by fear of punishment are already detered.

Output: Not similar


Input: Consider Input: Sent1: BUT it is not apparent that death penalty lower crime rate.
 Sent2: There's absolutely ZERO evidence that having a death penalty statute causes a lower crime rate, period.


Output: Similar