In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine the neutral choice based on your inference from the statement and your commonsense knowledge. The neutral choice is a sentence that neither agrees nor disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3', corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence. If sentence X agrees with sentence Y, one's correctness follows from the other one. If sentence X disagrees with sentence Y, they can not be correct at the same time.

Ex Input:
Statement: i don't either it's interesting though i never heard of such a project before Choices: 1. That is intriguing though I have not heard of that project before. 2. That project is old news by now. 3. I would be interested in participating in the project.

Ex Output:
3


Ex Input:
Statement: Consider Ehrlichman's reference to a certain left-wing Harvard professor, [first name unknown] Pomerantz, or whatever his name is, whose generosity towards the George McGovern campaign raises Nixon's suspicions. Choices: 1. Pomerantz's generosity raised Nixon's respect for him. 2. Pomerantz's generosity raised Nixon's doubts because of past experiences. 3. Pomerantz's generosity raised Nixon's doubts.

Ex Output:
2


Ex Input:
Statement: But the Nazis perceived Social Democracy as a Jewish party and Marxism as a Jewish creed; when they rallied against Bolshevik enemies, their audiences did not need to be told that these enemies were, if not actual Jews, then spiritual Jews. Choices: 1. The Nazis were aggressive against the Bolshevik enemies. 2. The Nazi party agreed with the things that Jews agreed with. 3. The Nazis rallied against the Bolshevik enemies.

Ex Output:

1