We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Q: We don't have 100% certainty in 100% of the cases so there forever remains a risk that an innocent person will be killed for anothers crime.

A: Valid
****
Q: You see, the people who cite what they would actually DO with guns cite all the wrong reasons, like protecting themselves from the state and similar.

A: Invalid
****
Q: A perfect judiciary system would not sentence innocent people, and would alleviate all problems with the death penalty.

A:
Valid
****