Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.

[EX Q]: $2000 for a "decent" counter top espresso machine? I had a $100 DeLonghi pump machine that made perfectly good espresso. I replaced it with a Gaggia Classic, because the DeLonghi died and I wanted something that would last, had replaceable parts, and was built by union workers making a living wage and good benefits. I bought the Gaggia, a burr grinder, stand, some cups, a frothing pitcher, and some descaler for $600 (it's about $100 more now). You can get one heck of an espresso machine for $2K.
[EX A]: No

[EX Q]: My impoverished mother scraped to send my brother and I to Catholic schools whenever we lived near one. They were rigid, & not much room for reflection or self-expression; But the academic, ruler and yardstick discipline - and no girls - did help me learn to focus academically.  
However, I've no empathy for this decision - and I might feel differently if the sexual misbehavior of so many priests hadn't put the Church in the position of the child-molesting pot calling the homosexual-lesbian kettle black.
The Juneau Chapel is a locals & tourists quiet spot of beauty and tranquility. If they don't want Alaskans or visitors of other faiths or of non-heterosexual preferences to use the Catholic Chapel itself for ceremonies - I can understand that - to a degree.. 
But the grounds could certainly accommodate a roofed/open deck for others to engage in positive spiritual sharing on occasion. The Bishop's stance would be quietly clear, yet the Shrine still be spiritually welcoming place to all.
[EX A]: Yes

[EX Q]: "God himself will punish those involved in homosexuality," he said. "This, is not for the servants" of God.    <- root of the problem.  What an ugly, hateful sentiment.
[EX A]:
Yes