The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.

Context: 'you are not being fair, bare in mind we have same priority, so if you take all the food you have to give me the wood and water, or you can take all the wood and water and give me the food' 'you also not fare,you also not  ready to give a give offer, give me 3 food , remaining one firewood one water 3 1 1' 'no, I think I will just walk away'
Utterance: 'bro u also not offer a good deal'
No

Context: 'Since I have never been camping before, why do you think you need 2 firewood?' 'Unfortunately, I have arthritis so being sure to keep warm and the dampness away in the evening, heat is important for me.' 'Ok.  I am worried about animals and bugs so I would prefer 2 firewood.  But I am happy with the 3 food🙂'
Utterance: 'Ok, how about we shift a bit as I hear you on the bugs and animals.  I think I can get by with one firewood and use extra covers and meds.  But, will need plenty of water and some food.  How about I take 1 firewood, 2 water and 2 food.'
No

Context: 'i would prefer water instead of food if possible, but i am sure we can work it out.' 'water is really important for me, how about i get two waters and three firewoods and you get three foods and one water?' 'i can work with 1 water 3 food and 1 firewood'
Utterance: 'ok that works for me'

No