In this task, you will be shown a sentence, and you should determine whether it is overruling or non-overruling. In law, an overruling sentence is a statement that nullifies a previous case decision as a precedent by a constitutionally valid statute or a decision by the same or higher ranking court which establishes a different rule on the point of law involved. Classify your answers into overruling or non-overruling

Input: Consider Input: we overrule division 2 in ghrist v. fricks and division 2 in matthews v. dukes, 314 ga.app. 782, 726 s.e.2d 95 (2012), to the extent they determined that the superior court had jurisdiction to sever parental rights because the termination issue was ancillary to the biological father's petition to legitimate.

Output: overruling


Input: Consider Input: the timeliness of bradshaw's attempt to obtain a pdr rehearing determines when his conviction became final and when the limitations period began to run.

Output: non-overruling


Input: Consider Input: we hereby disapprove of merendino v. burrell, 923 s.w.2d 258, 261 (tex. app.  beaumont 1996, writ denied), and miller v. cozart, 394 s.w.2d 22, 24 (tex.civ.app.  dallas 1965, no writ), to the extent that they hold that a person who owns or is otherwise responsible for horses has a duty to prevent the horses from roaming onto a farm-to-market road that is free from a local stock law.


Output: overruling