In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine the neutral choice based on your inference from the statement and your commonsense knowledge. The neutral choice is a sentence that neither agrees nor disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3', corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence. If sentence X agrees with sentence Y, one's correctness follows from the other one. If sentence X disagrees with sentence Y, they can not be correct at the same time.

[EX Q]: Statement: Slate writer Mickey Kaus calls them). Choices: 1. Slate writer Mickey Kaus does not acknowledge their presence. 2. Slate writer Mickey Kaus invites them for an interview. 3. Slate writer Mickey Kaus summons them.
[EX A]: 2

[EX Q]: Statement: New illumination was installed in 1985 to light up the tower from within, and it was the obvious main focus of France's celebrations for the change of the millennium in 1999. Choices: 1. The New Illumination was installed to light up the Eiffel Tower.   2. The New Illumination was not in place to celebrate the new millennium.   3. The New Illumination was the main focus for the new millennium celebrations.  
[EX A]: 1

[EX Q]: Statement: The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)10 has established procedures for the evaluation and approval of certain automated signature techniques11 to ensure data integrity and consistency with previously mentioned criteria. Choices: 1. The National Institute of Standards and Technology has established procedures for development 2. The National Institute of Standards and Technology has not established procedures for evaluation 3. The National Institute of Standards and Technology has established procedures for evaluation
[EX A]:
1