Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.

Example Input: Woo, woo! Commies under the bed. Leave the lights on, mommy.
Example Output: Yes

Example Input: "Each side takes the position of the man who was arrested for swinging his arms and hitting another in the nose, and asked the judge if he did not have a right to swing his arms in a free country. 'Your right to swing your arms ends just where the other man’s nose begins.' " (From a June 1919 Harvard Law Review article by legal philosopher Zechariah Chafee, Jr. titled “Freedom of Speech in War Time”) http://quoteinvestigator.com/2011/10/15/liberty-fist-nose/

If the Little Sisters of the Poor don't themselves believe in using contraception, they have the (religious) freedom to not use it. But when they start trying to impose their beliefs on employees, who might believe otherwise, they are going beyond their own (religious) freedoms and trying to impose their beliefs on others, i.e., to restrict the freedoms of others.

Yes, the lawyers can cite case law and legal doctrine. But none of that changes the basic principle that your freedoms end when you try to extend them to my body.
Example Output: No

Example Input: President Obama & Congress made a fundamental mistake in the ACA when they took the public option ( single payer ) off the table due to relentless pressure from the army of healthcare insurance lobbyists in Washington D.C.
Take the predatory, for profit, middleman insurance companies out of healthcare & we will see a reduction in healthcare costs. Until then, quit your whining as the insurers cherry pick the markets they choose to be in - as in profitable.
Example Output:
Yes