In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Example Input: Comment: Canada's ash my ass, its Alaska's ash!
Example Output: Obscene

Example Input: Comment: This is a former drama teacher who can hardly get through two sentences without stammering.  I think you might be overestimating his abilities.
Example Output: Non-obscene

Example Input: Comment: "We should also acknowledge that scientism itself has a grim history when conscripted by modern governments. As the totalitarian regimes of the 20th century showed, this can lead to a ruthless utilitarianism that strips men and women of their humanity. "

This is a bit of conclusion hopping. So the Governor General derided the religious as ignorant. Alright. Maybe it was smart move and maybe it wasn't. But this nonsense is dumber than anything she said.
Example Output:
Non-obscene