TASK DEFINITION: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.
PROBLEM: Comment: Liberal ethical hypocrisy yet again... Being corrupt last time and on the edge of political oblivion obviously didn't teach them the lesson. Look at Wynne and now Morneau. Bitch and moan about unethical policies that Harper and his ilk the Conservatives practiced and now do EXACTLY the same thing. Liberals are worse than Conservatives because they lie about being ethical during the election to get the progressive vote and then ditch it once they are in power. Typical Liberal playbook. Trudeau is full of shit.

SOLUTION: Obscene

PROBLEM: Comment: "It does seem a little hypocritical for Dogwood to be complaining about Kinder Morgan playing a role in the B.C. election through its donations to the BC Liberals, when it is receiving money from the United States to fight for causes aligned with interests there. "
In one case, foreign interests donate money to advocacy groups.
In the other, foreign interests donate money to a political party whose members currently form the provincial government. 
Not even remotely equivalent, Gary, and tf. hardly hypocritical of Dogwood to complain about it.

SOLUTION: Non-obscene

PROBLEM: Comment: Tell you what, BRO. *YOU* waste YOUR money on it--women who work know better.

SOLUTION:
Non-obscene