Categorize the comment on the basis of toxicity. If the comment is toxic (harmful, malicious, derogatory, threat, insult, identity attck, etc.) output Yes, otherwise output No.

Input: Consider Input: And I never will. You can't argue with and you can't fix ignorance.

Output: No


Input: Consider Input: Alaska needs to find a way to get more companies drilling and stop the harshness of the state oil and gas agencies that have run smaller competitors out in favor of the majors! 

Now the majors have laid off so many Alaskans maybe the state will stop running the smaller companies out with bad rulings! Alaska will need oil jobs and more oil fast! 

Look at the UK; http://www.rigzone.com/news/

Output: No


Input: Consider Input: It was more than that Paul.  Vinis repeatedly attacked Clark's record.   And he did not offer any vigorous defense.   Nor did he go on the offensive and attack any of the numerous vulnerabilities that Vinis had.   Apparently he thought he could win this election being a gentleman, and refraining from criticizing Vinis.

However, elections don't work that way.   Attack campaigns do work!   That is why politicians use them so much.


Output: No