The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.
--------
Question: Context: 'Food is the most important to me because I need to eat more often so that I can take my medications.  ' 'Yeah, that is important. I do not have a problem letting you have more food than me.' 'Would it be possible to get an extra water also?  How do you feel about the firewood?  I wish we could split everything evenly.🙂'
Utterance: 'Me too. Firewood is the most important thing to me. We will be somewhere cold and we could use the extra warmth.'

Answer: Yes


Question: Context: 'You can all the food if you need it.🙂' 'Thanks!🙂 Do you need any water packages?' 'Yes. Since the days are on the warmer side, I'm a afraid of getting dehydrated. I would love to have all of it...'
Utterance: 'Ah, that doesn't work for me. I would need to have at least one water because one of mine has a leak (and I have an extra person joining me).'

Answer: Yes


Question: Context: 'How nice. I am bringing my daughter and her girl scout troop. I am the co leader.' 'Oh that' 'We will need some extra water for all the girls on the hike.'
Utterance: 'Sorry, I sent my last message inadvertently. I meant to say that that sounds great! Yes, I can understand the need for extra water for the hike. With the size of my family, I could use a bit of extra food for our trip.'

Answer:
Yes