In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Ex Input:
Comment: The assertion by self_reliance about unions at United is, of course, ridiculous.  United has had unions for decades and many of those decades included superb service from United.  It is, as always, a crisis of leadership.  When things go bad, organizationally, then it is a leadership issue, pure and simple.

Ex Output:
Non-sexual-explicit


Ex Input:
Comment: Trid sees nothing wrong with "No Dogs or Jews", "We don't serve Muslims" and so on. He supports bigotry. And no, that is NOT a straw man, but the clear and obvious implication of your " If either the buyer or the seller does not want to enter into that contract for whatever reason then I believe they have the right to refuse." Thank you for proving that your claim to being a Christian is a complete sham.

Ex Output:
Non-sexual-explicit


Ex Input:
Comment: Fomenting black anger at countless real events, inciting inflamed relations during very real tragedies, being re-tweeted by countless angry influential celebrities. There is no universe in which any of this would have benefited candidate Trump politically.  I'd like to see how many prominent people were unwitting dupes of this Russian manipulation. @blacktivist had more facebook followers than the verified BLM account.

Ex Output:

Non-sexual-explicit