In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.
--------
Question: Sentence: Dan took the rear seat while Bill claimed the front because his "Dibs!" was quicker.
 Reason: The 'his' refers to bill because he was the first to take the wheel, and as such, Bill was the first driver to take. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

Answer: Wrong


Question: Sentence: The large ball crashed right through the table because it was made of styrofoam.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the table because The ball is made of styrofoam. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

Answer: Correct


Question: Sentence: I used an old rag to clean the knife, and then I put it in the trash.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the rag because it's unlikely you would put an old rag in a drawer. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

Answer:
Wrong