The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.

Input: Consider Input: Context: 'I was thinking that you could give me 3 food packages and i will give you 3 water? What do you think?' 'If I do that I would also like all three firewood' 'Why do you need all 3 firewoods?'
Utterance: 'I get cold pretty easily. Extra firewood would help me stay warm. And if I give up all food, I'll need another way to keep my body warm.'

Output: No


Input: Consider Input: Context: 'Hello I'm interested in obtaining more of the water and food, but don't need any extra firewood🙂' 'Well I am really in the same position as you are. Suppose I take 2 waters and only 1 food? ' 'I get really sweaty when I hike, so I really need to get at least 2 of the waters.'
Utterance: 'My friend is joining me tomorrow so there will be two of us. I really need the extra water so we both can stay hydrated. You can have all the food and 2 of the firewood packs if I get 2 of the water packs. 🙂'

Output: Yes


Input: Consider Input: Context: 'Since I'm most interested in firewood, I would want 3 waters if you're going to get more firewood.' 'Nice. That's okay with me. You get 3 waters and a I get 3 firewood' 'I was actually saying you get 2 firewood and I get 3 waters. Then you could have 2 food and I get 1 food.'
Utterance: 'That's seems fair to me since we all need food to eat'


Output: No