In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

Ex Input:
Comment: "It doesn't keep elections 'pure' it just drives the money into STUPID AREAS"

Well, that's a useful bunch of gibberish. It's not like there aren't elections all around the world with campaign finance laws that work quite well.

"You want to get good candidates get rid of every restriction BUT the REPORTING requirements."

Here's a better idea: leave every candidate with limited but equal financing -- so that candidates focus solely on explaining why their policy is superior to all others -- and every citizen, whether billionaire or hobo has but one equal voice.

It's "one man one vote" not "one dollar one vote."

Ex Output:
Non-identity-attack


Ex Input:
Comment: Those five police officers would still be alive if the police themselves didn't allow dirty cops to run roughshod over the people, especially blacks.

Ex Output:
Identity-attack


Ex Input:
Comment: Might as well breakout the ass trays and allow smoking inside. Lol. I eat peanuts or some type of treenut everyday in the comforts of my own home. I've always considered others in public settings and made sure I didn't bring traces to these areas. McD's has lost my respect and business on this decision.  Not sure why I support those who are affected by allergies but I'm glad I'm not ignorant to their struggles.

Ex Output:

Non-identity-attack