instruction:
The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the uv-part strategy, otherwise output No. uv-part is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to undermine the requirements of the opponent. For instance, suggesting that the opponent would not need more firewood since they already have the basic supplies or a suggestion that there might be a store near the campsite where the opponent can get the supplies instead.
question:
Context: 'Yes. And then I'll get 2 food and you'll get 1 food. And then I'll get 2 firewood and you'll get 1 firewood. How's that?' 'That sounds good to me.  It looks like it will be a good weekend for both of us.' 'I think so too! I hope that hurricane doesn't cause any issues to our plans!'
Utterance: 'I think we will be ok.  I'm more worried about the heat.  You can submit the deal if you want.'
answer:
No


question:
Context: 'Hello. 🙂 What item did you need a little extra of?' 'Thank you for asking, I would really like some extra fire wood as I usually get cold and scared at night so I can keep a fire going.' 'I'd be willing to give you all my firewood if you could give me all the water.'
Utterance: 'I do need at least one extra water bottle in case the fire goes out of control, but I am willing to forgo any food as I can forage for food.'
answer:
No


question:
Context: 'We could do without the water as well. I'm willing to trade you 3 firewood for 3 food and 2 waters' 'We need some firewood too, though! ☹️ Let's try to make a deal that benefits us both! 🙂 Could I have 1 firewood, 3 food, and 3 waters?' 'I meant I would give you my firewood, what would you trade in return?'
Utterance: 'Oh sorry for the confusion. 😮 In that case, thank you for the generosity! 🙂 How about if I have 3 firewood, 1 food, and 1 water?'
answer:

No