In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine the neutral choice based on your inference from the statement and your commonsense knowledge. The neutral choice is a sentence that neither agrees nor disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3', corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence. If sentence X agrees with sentence Y, one's correctness follows from the other one. If sentence X disagrees with sentence Y, they can not be correct at the same time.

[Q]: Statement: Consider Ehrlichman's reference to a certain left-wing Harvard professor, [first name unknown] Pomerantz, or whatever his name is, whose generosity towards the George McGovern campaign raises Nixon's suspicions. Choices: 1. Pomerantz's generosity raised Nixon's respect for him. 2. Pomerantz's generosity raised Nixon's doubts because of past experiences. 3. Pomerantz's generosity raised Nixon's doubts.
[A]: 2


[Q]: Statement: The ferry timetable runs on a winter (read curtailed) service until the first week in May. Choices: 1. Ferries are available until the first week in May. 2. After the first of may ends the peak season for ferries. 3. You can catch a ferry until June.
[A]: 2


[Q]: Statement: A backdoor appropriations victory is not exactly the strong-arming triumph a chief executive is supposed to win over Congress. Choices: 1. A chief executive should always be victorious in a fight with Congress. 2. A chief executive is supposed to be victorious in a fight with Congress in only some cases. 3. A chief executive can be victorious in a fight with Congress.
[A]:
2