In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: toxic and non-toxic. Toxicity is defiend as anything that is rude, disrespectful, or unreasonable that would make someone want to leave a converation.

Ex Input:
Comment: For over a decade, the Metro Vancouver region- and the province of BC as a whole- have needed the provincial govt to demonstrate bold, ambitious leadership by setting out a concise, multi-year policy and spending roadmap for the South of Fraser area...

... that is intended to bring this area up to (44 sq. miles) city of Vancouver public transportation, road, bridge and tunnel standards-

.... and in particular, to provide (246 sq. miles) Surrey and Langley with a legitimate** rapid transit rail network... One that will impress domestic and international onlookers- and potential investors- instead of making them yawn... 

** "Legitimate" rapid transit meaning rail lines that use: separated-from-roadway (IE: elevated); and computer-driven (automated) technologies (similar to the city of Vancouver's Expo, Millennium and Canada Lines),  and not the 19th-century technology "buses on rails" (that have been run along already busy roadways) LRT that Translink's Mayors Council are proposing...

Ex Output:
Non-toxic


Ex Input:
Comment: Yeah, damn those white people anyway, eh Wavemaker? Who do they think they are.

Ex Output:
Toxic


Ex Input:
Comment: The US may have some serious flaws but I understand the world would be in much worse shape had it not been for the US. You focus on and highlight the negatives and there have been many, but you fail to mention all of the good we have done over these decades. I chose to look at both the negatives and positives, learn from the negatives but promote the positives and grow from there.

Ex Output:

Non-toxic