In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: toxic and non-toxic. Toxicity is defiend as anything that is rude, disrespectful, or unreasonable that would make someone want to leave a converation.
--------
Question: Comment: There are some laudable aspects to President Trump's run, such as showing that candidates can talk directly to the electorate without spending a fortune on advertising and media consultants. But please recall that he did not win the popular vote. Had the majority of the voting American populace been heard, he would not be president. Had he lost narrowly in Wisconsin, Michigan and Pensylvania, instead of having won narrowly, he would be on reality tv today bragging about how he gave president Clinton's media and money machine such a hard time.  Important to keep perspective, while acknowledging that President Trump certainly sensed an undercurrent of silent dissatisfaction in something close to (but less than) the majority of Americans. Peace.

Answer: Non-toxic


Question: Comment: "Radical Islam monopoly at the UN". You mean New Zealand, France, the UK, Spain, right? God, you are so dumb.

Answer: Toxic


Question: Comment: Susan Conniry 
false reporting is a gross misdemeanor 
RCW 9A.76.175

Answer:
Non-toxic