In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine the neutral choice based on your inference from the statement and your commonsense knowledge. The neutral choice is a sentence that neither agrees nor disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3', corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence. If sentence X agrees with sentence Y, one's correctness follows from the other one. If sentence X disagrees with sentence Y, they can not be correct at the same time.

Example Input: Statement: McGwire's homer was a high fly, as Niehaus attested, and as was confirmed by his broadcast partner Rick Rizzs, who marveled at the ball's hang time. Choices: 1. McGwire hit a foul ball. 2. McGwire hit a home run out of the park. 3. McGwire hit a home run.
Example Output: 2

Example Input: Statement: Consider Ehrlichman's reference to a certain left-wing Harvard professor, [first name unknown] Pomerantz, or whatever his name is, whose generosity towards the George McGovern campaign raises Nixon's suspicions. Choices: 1. Pomerantz's generosity raised Nixon's respect for him. 2. Pomerantz's generosity raised Nixon's doubts because of past experiences. 3. Pomerantz's generosity raised Nixon's doubts.
Example Output: 2

Example Input: Statement: oh yes i mean when i had uh i was watching it the first time i ever saw a microbiologist on there i thought well it just goes to prove it has nothing to do with your physical capabilities and uh there she was terrific she was really terrific Choices: 1. I saw a microbiologist when I was watching. 2. The microbiologist was not talented at all. 3. I saw a microbiologist on American Nina Warrior.
Example Output:
3