In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

Q: Sentence: Thomson visited Cooper's grave in 1765. At that date he had been dead for five years.
 Reason: The 'he' refers to cooper because He visited Cooper's grave in 176. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

A: Wrong
****
Q: Sentence: As Ollie carried Tommy up the long winding steps, his legs ached.
 Reason: The 'his' refers to ollie because his legs dangled As Ollie carried Tommy up the long winding steps,. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

A: Wrong
****
Q: Sentence: John was jogging through the park when he saw a man juggling watermelons. He was very impressive.
 Reason: The 'He' refers to the juggler because A man juggler is referred to as the pronoun here a word that can function by itself as a noun phrase and that refers either to the participants in the discourse. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

A:
Wrong
****