In this task, you're given a statement, and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence clearly disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3' corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.
--------
Question: Statement: Participants expressed the belief that having the right people on the board is just as important if not more so as having the right rules under which the board operates. Choices:  1. Having people on the board is believed to be important. 2. The participants also expressed that they do not like the color red. 3. The participants expressed the belief that having the wrong people on the board is more important that having the wrong rules under which the board operates.

Answer: 3


Question: Statement: It was applied pro bono by attorney Robert Hamrick at the Schwabe Williamson &amp Choices:  1. Attorney Robert Hamrick did not apply it pro bono. 2. Attorney Robert Hamrick was being charitable by doing it pro bono. 3. Attorney Robert Hamrick applied it pro bono.

Answer: 1


Question: Statement: But skeptics suggest a darker  that the Lippo fee was a payoff to Hubbell to keep quiet about Whitewater. Choices:  1. Skeptics think that the Lippo fee was Hubbell's payoff to remain quiet about Whitewater and other scandals. 2. Skeptics think that the Lippo fee was Hubbell's payoff to give all of the details about Whitewater. 3. Skeptics think that the Lippo fee was Hubbell's payoff to remain quiet about Whitewater.

Answer:
2