We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

[Q]: Those are all the government, if it has gotten as far as the people, and the government (the president, the congress, the supreme court) has decided on gun control, who's going to arrest them for it?
[A]: Valid


[Q]: You argue that people cannot be trusted with guns, because they might injure themselves in accidents (hence the 4.46 figure).
[A]: Valid


[Q]: And before Heller, numerous judges declared that the Second Amendment was nothing more than a collective right that belonged to the states, giving them permission to have private militia armies for their own defense.
[A]:
Valid