We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Do you expect 12 executions per year to deter a murder rate of the above mentioned amount?
Valid

Morally, I do not believe in eye for an eye, because it would leave the whole world blind.
Valid

And especially why would one do that if it means death penalty would become possible?

Valid