Given a document and an entity the task is to select the author's sentiment towards the entity. Sentiments can be Positive, Neutral and Negative. Select Positive if the article expresses a positive view towards the given entity or praises its quality or skills. Select Neutral if the document expresses no clear view towards the entity or has equal amounts of positive and negative statements or expressing some fact/quote by someone else. Select Negative if the article expresses a negative view towards like harsh remarks, criticizing entities action/decision etc. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

What is the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Gus Kenworthy ? Call it a good news-bad news scenario for  Gus Kenworthy .
 The outspoken freestyle skier  broke  his  thumb in training on Thursday.
 He  tweeted out a picture of  his  X-Ray  along with one of  his  freshly casted hand and included this quip: "It won't stop me from competing (obvi) but it does prevent me from shaking Pence's hand so ... Silver linings! "
 Kenworthy  has previously said  he  would not go to the White House as part of the traditional visit the U.S. Olympic team makes after the Olympics.
Positive

What is the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Taylor Swift ? Taylor Swiftâs lawyers  are trying to shake off claims that the âShake It Offâ singer stole lyrics with a new court motion.
 Swift  was sued in September by songwriters Sean Hall and Nathan Butler  who created the song âPlayas Gonâ Playâ for the girl group 3LW in 2001. The duo claimed that  Swift  stole their lyrics and used them in her famous hit single âShake It Off.â
On Wednesday  the singerâs lawyers asked the federal judge to dismiss the copyright lawsuit against  Swift  and argued that the concepts of players playing and haters hating are common music phrases and âpublic domain clichÃ©sâ that canât be claimed as copyright  according to Variety.
 Swift  used the familiar phrase in the chorus of her song which says  âPlayers gonna play  play  play  play  play  and haters gonna hate  hate  hate  hate  hate.â
âThere can be no copyright protection in âplayas  they gonna play and haters  they gonna hate â because it would impermissibly monopolize the idea that players will play and haters will hate â  Swift âs lawyers said. âPlaintiffsâ claim to being the only ones in the world who can refer to players playing and haters hating is frivolousâ¦ Providing a copyright monopoly in the phrase would prevent others from sharing the idea that players play and haters hate.â
To further prove their argument   Swift âs legal team went on to cite other examples of famous songs that use the âplayerâ and âhaterâ phrase such as âDreamsâ by Fleetwood Mac  in which the song says  âPlayers only love you when theyâre playing â and âPlaya Hater â by the Notorious B.I.G.  where the phrase âplaya  playa haterâ is used as the part of the songâs chorus.
Positive

What is the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Kassandra Lawrence ? Kassandra Lawrence  was desperate.
 Lawrence  couldnât afford the cost of a private attorney upfront. So  in an effort to find an alternative  she did an online search for âpregnancy discriminationâ and âIvanka Trumpâ â the only high-profile person she knew who was talking about family-leave issues. The search led her to a story that mentioned the NWLC.
âI just knew that what happened to me wasnât right and shouldnât happen to anyone else â  Lawrence  said. âIt certainly didnât seem right that you need to be rich  or somehow have a lot of extra money for a lawyer to even get to court.â
The problems had started when  Lawrence  delivered  her  second child.  She  had been working for the Stafford County  Va.  sheriffâs office for eight years when  she  became pregnant again. The pregnancy went smoothly  but the delivery did not.  Lawrence  lost a lot of blood during a complicated Caesarean section.
In the middle of  her  recovery  the sheriffâs department told  Lawrence   she  needed to report to work on a specific date or reapply for a job  according to  her  lawsuit.  She  had 12 weeksâ leave  no more  under the Family and Medical Leave Act  and  she  had already taken âtoo muchâ time off. All of it was essentially regarded as optional by a department official who said âwomen chose to have children â the lawsuit says.  She  should have planned things in a way that wasnât so disruptive.
 Lawrence  needed  her  job  and  she  liked it.  She  still does. So  she  went back to work in pain and with scar tissue wrapped around some of  her  organs.  Lawrence  put off surgery to remove it because  she  knew how it would be received at work.
When  she  took time off for carpel tunnel surgery on  her  weapon hand â necessary to do  her  job â department officials accused  her  of medical malingering   she  said  using leave time to be with  her  kids.
Thatâs when  she  saw it: a memo from the sheriff asking employees to donate leave time to a colleague undergoing cancer treatment. The sheriff asserted that  while the man had exhausted his 12 weeks of leave  he deserved the departmentâs help   Lawrence  said.
âI had already  at this point  had a lot of strange conversations  had a lot of things said to  me  about women being such an unfair burden on the department â  Lawrence  said. âFirst  you question yourself. You do. Then  like most people who need their jobs  you [get] angry. You get scared. But that memo  I just couldnât believe that theyâd put this attitude in a memo  clear as day.â

Positive