In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: threat and non-threat. Threat is a statement that someone will be hurt or harmed, especially if the person does not do something in particular.
--------
Question: Comment: I'm not a progressive. As long it's him being shot and not me, I'm all for it. In general the bear is more interesting alive than the bozo that shot himself.

Answer: Threat


Question: Comment: This guy is someone spread hate. He should be denied freedom of speech.

Answer: Non-threat


Question: Comment: The headline is ridiculous. There is no "drunk pilot problem". In the Sunwing incident the system worked EXACTLY as designed, and an individual who made a very poor decision was removed from his position well before any harm could be done. Just as it should be in any profession involving a high level of responsibility.

No, safety does not "trump everything". It is important, to be sure. But there comes a point when the "safety" argument is trotted out to defend rules that are nonsensical, unproven to have any actual effect, and only serve to further erode the rights of individuals. I get it, in Canada everyone looks to regulations as their sole salvation, but be careful what you wish for. 

Who the EFF is Ashley Nunes, anyway?

Answer:
Non-threat