In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Ex Input:
Comment: I totally agree.  Why would anyone want to make any investment in this country with a very aggressive anti business government.  One look at Mr Morneau's tax suggestions on small/large/any business and you would have to give your head a shake.  The CEO of Amazon is not that foolish.

Ex Output:
Non-sexual-explicit


Ex Input:
Comment: I would love to pay the same rates but due to our progressive tax system I am paying a lot, lot more than most people who are whining and claiming they are paying their fair share of taxes. 
Cause no you don't.

Ex Output:
Non-sexual-explicit


Ex Input:
Comment: You prove my point. I challenged you to read Hebrews and you either can't or won't. It is not an historical fact that church teaching has remain unchanged through the millenia. Trent, in my view, is Medieval and should go the way of the Inquisition and the crimes of the Papacy-such as screwing nuns with a torture chamber below the Papal bedroom with a channel to allow the screams of the victims of the Inquisition to reach His Holiness while he has sex. 
    Or go the way of the end to priests who shove the Host up a teenage girl's vagina in Philadelphia in our day, albeit decades ago. Or, why in heck would you want to crucify Jesus if you ever met Him? This is the theology of alienation. Dark theology breeds corruption and spiritual decay. 
    I DARE you to tell me you have read the letter to the Hebrews in the New Testament and that you are not brainwashed, as so many Catholics are.

Ex Output:

Sexual-explicit