We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

[EX Q]: Sent1: I don't feel as strongly about the death penalty as I feel about the abortion rights debate since I can relate to the desire for vengeance that people feel.
 Sent2: With all that it has been a very trying time for me and I have had to struggle with how I really felt about the death penalty.
[EX A]: Not similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: An argument for putting people to death is so that they can never escape and kill again.
 Sent2: I think instead of a death penalty, they should just stay in prison until they die because putting someone to death is just harsh, No matter who it is.
[EX A]: Not similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: >_> Says the person who brought up freaking Nelson in a debate about the death penalty for murders.
 Sent2: As it is today, when someone murderers another, the death penalty is considered, as it should be.
[EX A]:
Not similar