In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

[EX Q]: Comment: Knew, don't care. This is about the UAA volleyball team, not your off-topic blather. Try to keep up, okay?
[EX A]: Non-sexual-explicit

[EX Q]: Comment: because Trump is a self confessed sex offender such as this convicted sex offender you support as in essentially accusing the victim of lying...your words not mine. you only know what you read in the Guard but yet again you accuse the victim of lying. third you agree with Outsider 77 because you can't stand on your own.  next time you accuse a victim of being sexually abused by a grown man pull your fat head out of your old ass long enough to see the facts before your run your mouth.
[EX A]: Sexual-explicit

[EX Q]: Comment: If accidents involving a distracted drivers were to kill only the driver, that would actually improve the species via "survival of the fittest".  

But deadly accidents caused by distracted drivers almost always involve innocent people as well, and that should be treated as manslaughter, with loss of vehicle, drivers license and possibly even mandatory jail sentences.

It is the simplest thing in the world to shut off a phone at speed exceeding X mph, as a GPS is already built in to every single one. But who has the courage to implement that?

Stephen J. Remington
[EX A]:
Non-sexual-explicit