Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.

Q: Riversong, please cite the SCOTUS ruling you believe most supports your claim that the federal government has the right to own more than half of the land in the State of Oregon? 

The Tenth Amendment states: "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people." That plainly establishes a requirement for indisputable explicitness in the Constitution regarding federal rights. If there is a question at all, the tie — the uncertainty — MUST go in favor of "the States respectively, or to the people," NOT the federal government.

We now have a dead man and several imprisoned people because they dared to ask a reasonable Constitutional question regarding their rights and States rights, and their reasonable question has not been answered by the government. 

How many more dead people do you require before you will do the work necessary to amend the U.S. Constitution?

A: Yes
****
Q: And as usual convoluted rules of engagement from this white house passed along through  the military they scorn, targeting low level direct US military combatants, no interest in winning by Obama, and this hospital having admitted and treated the terrorists fighters, what can you expect? And yes they did it to the soldiers in Vietnam as well.

A: Yes
****
Q: Shoot to kill policy ? Enlighten me .

A:
Yes
****