In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

Example Input: Sentence: I'm sure that my map will show this building; it is very good.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the map because it is the only building that could be built in the area in the mid game. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Example Output: Wrong

Example Input: Sentence: Jane knocked on Susan's door, but there was no answer. She was out.
 Reason: The 'She' refers to susan because she's the only one of the three who is still alive, and the other two are either dead. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Example Output: Wrong

Example Input: Sentence: The sack of potatoes had been placed below the bag of flour, so it had to be moved first.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the bag of flour because If the sack of potatoes is on top it only makes sense that it has to be moved first. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Example Output:
Correct