In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

[EX Q]: Comment: I never thought to look at their$%^&*(*^%$$ pension funds. Poop. Thanks
[EX A]: Non-sexual-explicit

[EX Q]: Comment: But many corporations and those in "financial America" contribute a lot to charity. Also a write off, but helpful. Trump does not. Another thing his tax returns will show. I am willing to bet he's even lying about being audited.
[EX A]: Non-sexual-explicit

[EX Q]: Comment: There is racism, and then there's denial of another's right to exist. Every day, on average 28 people die in the country mostly anonymously because someone decided that driving under the influence is okay. Did you care about anyone who died this way yesterday? What is racism but yet another manifestation of denial. Not denial of another, denial of oneself. "This person looks different from me, that can't be right." No logical person would deny that differences are everywhere. Only insecure people would. Insecure people raised by other insecure people who erected statues to celebrate their resolve toward homogeneity. Illogical, unproven, non-existent homogeneity. Mirror neurons take care of the rest: people copy other people's behavior to survive and avoid being shamed. Now, would you rather copy the behavior of a violent counter-protestor, or someone who respectfully sits down with you to show that diversity is everywhere and that the world doesn't end when you embrace the concept?
[EX A]:
Non-sexual-explicit