instruction:
In this task, you are given a part of an article. Your task is to generate headline (title) for this text. Preferred headlines are under fifteen words.
question:
Accurate prediction of suitable discourse connectives (however, furthermore, etc.) is a key component of any system aimed at building coherent and fluent discourses from shorter sentences and passages. As an example, a dialog system might assemble a long and informative answer by sampling passages extracted from different documents retrieved from the web. We formulate the task of discourse connective prediction and release a dataset of 2.9M sentence pairs separated by discourse connectives for this task. Then, we evaluate the hardness of the task for human raters, apply a recently proposed decomposable attention (DA) model to this task and observe that the automatic predictor has a higher F1 than human raters (32 vs. 30). Nevertheless, under specific conditions the raters still outperform the DA model, suggesting that there is headroom for future improvements. Finally, we further demonstrate the usefulness of the connectives dataset by showing that it improves implicit discourse relation prediction when used for model pre-training.
answer:
Automatic Prediction of Discourse Connectives


question:
We present a character-level recurrent neural network that generates relevant and coherent text given auxiliary information such as a sentiment or topic. Using a simple input replication strategy, we preserve the signal of auxiliary input across wider sequence intervals than can feasibly be trained by back-propagation through time. Our main results center on a large corpus of 1.5 million beer reviews from BeerAdvocate. In generative mode, our network produces reviews on command, tailored to a star rating or item category. The generative model can also run in reverse, performing classification with surprising accuracy. Performance of the reverse model provides a straightforward way to determine what the generative model knows without relying too heavily on subjective analysis. Given a review, the model can accurately determine the corresponding rating and infer the beer’s category (IPA, Stout, etc.). We exploit this capability, tracking perceived sentiment and class membership as each character in a review is processed. Quantitative and qualitative empirical evaluations demonstrate that the model captures meaning and learns nonlinear dynamics in text, such as the effect of negation on sentiment, despite possessing no a priori notion of words. Because the model operates at the character level, it handles misspellings, slang, and large vocabularies without any machinery explicitly dedicated to the purpose.
answer:
CHARACTER-LEVEL GENERATIVE TEXT MODELS


question:
The recent application of RNN encoder-decoder models has resulted in substantial progress in fully data-driven dialogue systems, but evaluation remains a challenge. An adversarial loss could be a way to directly evaluate the extent to which generated dialogue responses sound like they came from a human. This could reduce the need for human evaluation, while more directly evaluating on a generative task. In this work, we investigate this idea by training an RNN to discriminate a dialogue model’s samples from human-generated samples. Although we find some evidence this setup could be viable, we also note that many issues remain in its practical application. We discuss both aspects and conclude that future work is warranted.
answer:

Adversarial Evaluation of Dialogue Models