instruction:
In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.
question:
Comment: You're right, Colkoch.  There are so many sins that are committed every day that cause real harm to real people -- like cutting funds for food for the hungry, or cutting medical reimbursement to providers, resulting in limited access to medical care for many in need, and domestic violence, and so on and so on, ad infinitum.  Yet, these guardians of morality have a need to focus on homosexual sex and then to insist that they are not homophobic......
answer:
Sexual-explicit


question:
Comment: So she voted against opening discussions to fix the disastrous, flawed, failing, Obamacare. Brilliant! Meaningless and stupid. How about voting to fix the flawed, failing bill. This makes no sense. Of course it's a phony no vote cause she had permission to vote no from leadership cause they had enough votes to win. Time for a new principled  senator in AK.
answer:
Non-sexual-explicit


question:
Comment: Your San Francisco ass will be saved by your dog, not by your spray.  Too bad for your dog, but thank goodness the bear and the San Franciscan won't be hurt.  You'll just buy a new dog to scatter his guts to save your ass.
answer:

Sexual-explicit