In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

Input: Consider Input: Comment: Another Muslim jerk, amazing how Alaska has changed in the past 30 yrs. or so, look all low lifes that are allowed to come here and comment murder, but that's okay. we have a house full of jerks sitting in Juneau allowing this to happen.

Output: Identity-attack


Input: Consider Input: Comment: Where were you when the media, blacks, and liberals kept bringing up race every time there's a police shooting? Your double standard is glaring.

Output: Identity-attack


Input: Consider Input: Comment: Please observe your response. The strategy is to "go for 100%" and then settle for 30%." If you read the new executive order and actually react with -- well, that's better. I can live with that. Then you have silenced your own opposition. 
No, it isn't ok.
It is still part of drumming up hatred for people because of their nationality. This is the kind of stuff that hatched in Rwanda and was fed by their media. 
Another strategy is to keep this constant assault on our sensibilities that we just stop paying attention and "normalize a demagogue" by not resisting. 

Reading this executive order not as an 'improved' version... a move by a demagogue, the same one that said he could go out in the street and shoot someone and it wouldn't effect his polling numbers. Getting away with it is a sport.


Output: Non-identity-attack