Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.

[EX Q]: Dick, we are all waiting; YOU first.
[EX A]: Yes

[EX Q]: The three former judges are mediators. Caldwell's latest appointee, now awaiting Council confirmation, Peter Adler is also a mediator. The Commission needs diversity, both in professional background and age. The commissioners, including designee Adler, are in their 60s and 70s.  That appointment should be held in Council until after the August primary election. If Caldwell loses, his successor should make the appointment. Although this would leave the commission short a member for many more months, there are many commission vacancies the mayor has not filled. The key message in this article is that the mayor wants to destroy the Ethics Commission. The voters and Council should make sure he doesn't.
[EX A]: No

[EX Q]: if that birdie on the podium at sanders rally in portland had landed on trumps podium...? he would have tried to swat it, cursed it for pooping on the podium,  all while dozens of his supporters pulling out their legal firearms and taking aim at the little birdie.  ***yeah well,  if elected, trump is no longer a "businessman" and the rules of law do apply.  BTW - any politician can just blow off their past? "that's the way business gets transacted? " really?   is that really your response?  that is one dumb reply doc.  just dumb.  perhaps the dumbest, relevant comment I've seen.  and yeah the trump horse and pony "show" may light the heavens in a way WE have yet to see , courtesy of every other insane world leader.
[EX A]:
No