The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the self-need strategy, otherwise output No. self-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to create a personal need for an item in the negotiation, such as by pointing out that the participant sweats a lot to show preference towards water packages.

[Q]: Context: 'hi how are you?'
Utterance: 'Im good thanks, and you? 🙂'
[A]: No


[Q]: Context: 'Im a vegitarian so food I would like 1 food and for fire 2' 'I think that we can work it out 🙂. We could do something like 2 firewood for you, 1 for me. 2 water for me, 1 for you. And 1 or 2 foods for you, 1 or 2 foods for me. What do you think?' 'That is a kind offer. 🙂 The water is very vital for me. How bout 3 water for me, 0 food for me 3 for you and 1 firewood for me and 2 for you '
Utterance: 'Zero water is not going to work 😮. I am willing to switch water and firewood amounts so that I get 2 firewood and 1 water and you get 2 water and 1 firewood. '
[A]: Yes


[Q]: Context: 'Thank you, I would appreciate that and it is very generous of you, Im not a strong hunter or fisher at all :) ' 'Awesome! I think we have a deal! So just to clarify, I will have all the extra food so that I can have strength to forage, you will have all the water, and I will have 2 firewoods so I can have a hot fire for our catch of the day! Are you happy with this, friend? 🙂' 'I do agree with that, I am happy with all of the extra water, and I should be able to get more firewood pretty easily, and since you will be sharing whatever food you find, I think that we came up with a pretty fair split.'
Utterance: 'It's always lovely to have a camping companion you can cooperate with! '
[A]:
No