Given a document, an entity and its sentiment towards the entity, verify if it is the correct sentiment towards the entity. Answer should be yes or no. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

[Q]: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Marco Asensio is Neutral . Madrid (AFP) â Real Madrid quietened crisis talk after back-to-back defeats as  Marco Asensio  added to  his  collection of wonder strikes in a 3-0 victory over Las Palmas at the Santiago Bernabeu on Sunday.
A booking would have ruled Casemiro out of the Madrid derby against Atletico in two weeksâ time and he was quickly replaced after  Asensio  secured the three points in stunning fashion.
 Asensio  has made a habit of netting in spectacular fashion in  his  first 18 months at Madrid and pounced on a loose ball 30 yards from goal to rifle a shot that rose all the way on its trajectory into the top corner.
Ronaldo fired inches over twice more  but  whilst his luck remained out in front of goal   he  did provide an enticing cross from which Isco slotted home at the back post for Madridâs third.
[A]: no


[Q]: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Maulana Masood Azhar is Neutral . FILE PHOTO:  Maulana Masood Azhar   head of Pakistan's militant Jaish-e-Mohammad party  attends a pro-Taliban conference organised by the Afghan Defence Council in Islamabad August 26  2001.
India  backed by the United States  has been trying to get  Maulana Masood Azhar  on a U.N. list of groups with ties to Al Qaeda  blaming his group for a series of attacks in India  including one on its parliament in 2002 and another last year on an airbase.
It said it interrogated  Azhar  and  his  associates in the Jaish-e-Mohammad group after the January 2016 attack on the Pathankot air base but found no evidence linking  him  to it.
 Hua  said there were clear rules for listing a person or group as a terrorist  and that China has always believed the relevant U.N. committee should operate on the principles of objectivity  fairness and professionalism on this matter.
[A]: no


[Q]: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Michael Horowitz is Neutral . DOJ Inspector General Michael Horowitz  told House Judiciary Democrats in a letter on Friday that the department did not consult  his  office before releasing text messages that are currently under OIG investigation to Congress and the press.
It is still unclear who authorized the decision  if not  Horowitz .
The Justice Department's inspector general   Michael Horowitz   told the House Judiciary Committee on Friday that  his  office (OIG) was not consulted before private text messages that are currently under OIG investigation were shared with members of the media on Tuesday.
 Horowitz  told the committee â which had asked  him  in a previous letter whether the DOJ consulted  his  office before releasing the texts â that  he  testified in November that the OIG "had no objection to the department providing to Congress pre-existing Department records in its custody in response to a Congressional oversight request."
 He  said  he  noted at the time "that the Department would need to determine whether there were any restrictions  such as those affecting grand-jury information  that limited its ability to produce certain records to Congress.
"I conveyed this position to the Department as well  " Horowitz  said. "The Department did not consult with the OIG in order to determine whether releasing the text messages met applicable ethical and legal standards before providing them to Congress."
In short   Horowitz  wrote  the DOJ "did not consult with the OIG before sharing the text messages with the press."
"IG had no objection to release to Congress. We then consulted senior career legal/ethics experts to determine there were no issues w releasing texts to either Congress or press  " Flores wrote. The OIG released another statement on Friday night that echoed the points  Horowitz  made in  his  letter.
But it is still unclear who authorized the decision  if not  Horowitz .
Read  Horowitz 's letter below:
[A]:
no