Given a document and an entity the task is to select the author's sentiment towards the entity. Sentiments can be Positive, Neutral and Negative. Select Positive if the article expresses a positive view towards the given entity or praises its quality or skills. Select Neutral if the document expresses no clear view towards the entity or has equal amounts of positive and negative statements or expressing some fact/quote by someone else. Select Negative if the article expresses a negative view towards like harsh remarks, criticizing entities action/decision etc. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

Input: Consider Input: What is the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Vincent Brown ? Neither could  Vincent Brown   41  who plans to use the camera on the phone to take pictures for his bakery business. Five friends joined him on the line.
 Brown  says is looking forward to the Face ID facial recognition and says  he  wonât miss the home button. âThe home button is kind of aggravating to  me  â  he  says. As for the price   Brown  said  he  already spent around $1 000 for an iPhone 7 Plus.
 Vincent Brown  has been here since 6:45 with friends. Runs a bakery in the Bronx  excited for the camera which will help  his  business pic.twitter.com/hWIyMKLS8r â Eli Blumenthal (@eliblumenthal) November 2  2017
While Chen and  Brown  plan to buy the phone for personal use  others were likely looking to make a quick buck reselling the phone  especially with the X reportedly in short supply. Many people on the line spoke little or no English  or were reluctant to talk to USA TODAY about why they were willing to camp out. Apple limits each individual buyer to two phones.

Output: Positive


Input: Consider Input: What is the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Brian Krebs ? These terrifying tales sent me looking for a book I had been meaning to read for quite some time. My former Washington Post colleague  Brian Krebs  left the newspaper in 2009 to dedicate  himself  to a blog on cybersecurity: KrebsOnSecurity.com. Out of  his  work and research came âSpam Nation: The Inside Story of Organized Cybercrime â From Global Epidemic to Your Front Door.â
But  Krebs  has made a background believer out of me.
âThe Internet of today is truly a transformative communications and learning tool that radically enriches the lives of billions each day â  Krebs  writes. âYet  never before in the history of the Internet has this medium been more fraught with snares and neâer-do-wells looking to fleece the unwary.
With our spam filters and the constant drilling to not open suspicious emails  weâve been lulled into a false sense of security   Krebs  says.
âThe spam ecosystem is a constantly evolving technological and sociological crime machine that feeds on itself â writes  Krebs . âThus far  the criminals responsible for unleashing this daily glut of digital disease are doing a stupendous job of overwhelming the security industry.â
 Krebs  spends a lot of time introducing the major and minor spam players. Itâs like a Jason Bourne movie but with criminals who donât shoot at folks (well  some do). They instead fire out malicious spam infecting tens of millions of computers and  as a result  rake in millions of dollars.
Waiting for you at the end of the book is a very resourceful chapter on how to protect yourself. Youâll be safer following  Krebs âs three rules for online security:
Even if you donât buy âSpam Nation â make  Krebs âs blog regular reading.  His  reporting will frighten you. It does me. As  he  writes  âthose who endeavor to remain blissfully unaware of their role in becoming part of the solution will almost invariably end up becoming part of the problem.â
Iâm hosting an online discussion about âSpam Nationâ at noon Eastern time on Nov. 2 at washingtonpost.com/discussions.  Krebs  will join me to answer your cybersecurity questions.

Output: Positive


Input: Consider Input: What is the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Donald J. Trump ? In morning tweets and later in a âlistening sessionâ at the White House   Trump  claimed the strategy of arming teachers would be far less costly than hiring guards.  He  said âgun-freeâ school zones make it like âgoing in for ice creamâ for school shooters and said on Twitter that with  his  strategy  âATTACKS WOULD END!â
 His  remarks amplified a strategy  Trump  pushed during a first âlistening sessionâ Wednesday at the White House  which included relatives of some of the 17 people killed by a gunman last week at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in South Florida. Thursday's session included law enforcement officers and other officials.
[ âFix itâ: Students and parents tell  Trump   he  needs to address gun violence at schools ]
âHighly trained  gun adept  teachers/coaches would solve the problem instantly  before police arrive â  Trump  said in one morning tweet.
During the âlistening sessionâ a couple of hours later   Trump  said  he  wants âmy schools protected just like I want my banks protected.â
In his tweets   Trump  claimed his strategy had been mischaracterized by some news outlets and is more nuanced than reported. He said he envisioned only about 20 percent of teachers having concealed weapons and said they would have âmilitary or special training experience.â
âIf a potential âsicko shooterâ knows that a school has a large number of very weapons talented teachers (and others) who will be instantly shooting  the sicko will NEVER attack that school â  Trump  said. âCowards wonât go there ... problem solved. Must be offensive  defense alone wonât work!â
In a later tweet   Trump  praised NRA chief executive Wayne LaPierre and executive director Chris W. Cox  whose organization has advocated not overreacting to last week's shooting.
âWhat many people donât understand  or donât want to understand  is that Wayne  Chris and the folks who work so hard at the @NRA are Great People and Great American Patriots â  Trump  wrote. âThey love our Country and will do the right thing.â
âMAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!â  Trump  added.
In the aftermath of the shooting   Trump  has publicly and privately floated actions that would be at odds with the positions of the NRA  one of  his  biggest supporters in the 2016 campaign.
In a separate tweet Thursday   Trump  appeared to highlight one of those conflicts: raising the age for purchasing assault rifles from 18 to 21.
âI will be strongly pushing Comprehensive Background Checks with an emphasis on Mental Health. Raise age to 21 and end sale of Bump Stocks!â  Trump  said in the tweet. âCongress is in a mood to finally do something on this issue â I hope!â
 Trump  said during Friday's listening session that  he  thought the NRA would support raising the age to 21.
âI don't think I'll be going up against them. ... They're good people â said  Trump   who also praised the organization more broadly. âThe NRA is ready to do things. People like to blame them.â
Instead  Pence pointed to  Trump 's call for members of Congress to âstrengthen background checksâ and for the Justice Department to expedite new regulations for âbump stocks â devices that can convert a legal semiautomatic weapon into one that fires like a fully automatic one.


Output: Positive