In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

Example Input: Sentence: As Ollie carried Tommy up the long winding steps, his legs dangled.
 Reason: The 'his' refers to tommy because his legs dangled As Ollie carried Tommy up the long winding steps,. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Example Output: Correct

Example Input: Sentence: Since it was raining, I carried the newspaper in my backpack to keep it dry.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the newspaper because it's one of the only things I've been able to find that would give me a good idea. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Example Output: Wrong

Example Input: Sentence: Joe paid the detective after he received the final report on the case.
 Reason: The 'he' refers to joe because the detective would have had the report already. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Example Output:
Correct