TASK DEFINITION: In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.
PROBLEM: Sentence: Sam's drawing was hung just above Tina's and it did look much better with another one below it.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to sam's drawing because it's a pretty well known thing, a drawing of a fish that has a fishy body with. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

SOLUTION: Wrong

PROBLEM: Sentence: Bob paid for Charlie's college education. He is very grateful.
 Reason: The 'He' refers to charlie because Charlie received the benefit so he would be grateful. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

SOLUTION: Correct

PROBLEM: Sentence: If the con artist has succeeded in fooling Sam, he would have lost a lot of money.
 Reason: The 'he' refers to sam because The con artist would be the one attempting to get money. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

SOLUTION:
Correct