In this task, you are given a statement spoken by a politician in natural language and the subject of the discussion for the given statement. Your task is to determine if the given subject of the discussion is correct for the given statement. The subject can be multiple words. Answer with "True" if it's the correct subject of discussion or return "False" if it's incorrect.

Example Input: Statement: Police in the United States are allowed to use tear gas even though it has been classified as a chemical weapon and banned in international conflict since 1993. 
 Subject: criminal-justice,foreign-policy,legal-issues
Example Output: True

Example Input: Statement: At the 50 Milwaukee schools serving at least 80% African-American and at least 80% low income students, the reading proficiency is 8%. 
 Subject: education
Example Output: True

Example Input: Statement: One of the key things about Leonard Lance is that in 2008, when you look at [the] Project Vote Smart website, he was not for guns. Now he has gone too far to the right, saying that you can carry concealed weapons in national parks. 
 Subject: candidates-biography,guns
Example Output:
True