Categorize the comment on the basis of severe toxicity. If the comment is severely toxic output Yes, otherwise output No.

Ex Input:
I don't care. That is the point!  It is a damn restaurant that serves spanish / mexican -ish food, and that is a good name for it and for letting their potential patrons know what kind of food they serve.   BUT, you know who should be up in arms over it?...you, and wweek and all of the other "activists" who are pretending to really care about Saffron Colonial all of the sudden.  The fact that you aren't proves that you are insincere about this "cause" (using that term loosely) and just doing all of this to draw attention to yourself.

Ex Output:
Yes


Ex Input:
So a verbal threat is a reason to shoot someone?

Ex Output:
Yes


Ex Input:
That's a common misconception about tenured faculty. It depends on the department, college or university. Some tenured faculty are expected to publish a lot, whereas others are not expected to publish at all. I know of full professors who haven't published in a decade but have earned "honors" and "awards" and pay increases not contingent on publishing. Some are rewarded for other activities, or simply by the reputation they earned many years ago. Sometimes, like in any organization, there is favoritism, nepotism, etc.

The status of tenure is also changing with this new generation of faculty, as universities and colleges no longer have (and most can't financially sustain) as many tenured faculty as they once did. This coincides with the fact that the structure of higher education is also changing as online education is becoming more prominent and campus-based higher education is less necessary for delivering quality research and instruction to a wide audience anywhere.

Ex Output:

No