In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: insult and non-insult. Insult is any lanugage or act that is disrespectful or scornfully abusive.
--------
Question: Comment: Well, that's $350 million dollars that CETA is going to cost Canadians just to attempt to get back to the pre-CETA status quo.  We won't reach status quo, mind you, but it is still a solid example of CETA hindering, not helping Canadians.

Answer: Non-insult


Question: Comment: you are stupid, literally

Answer: Insult


Question: Comment: Okay, my second major problem with this article. I am not an historian, so I can't be sure, but I'm pretty sure that the "sex for resources" exchange type of marriage never existed. Up until the early 20th century, I am fairly sure that marriage was fundamentally about securing, maintaining, and extending family wealth. Both men and women were jointly providing services, and both were getting sex, but most negotiations were familial anyway. And even later, once married women were hardly the "keepers" of sex - they were subject to the will of their husbands, leading to John Stuart Mill quote on marriage as the invisible tyranny. So anyway, a far cry from this presentation of "good old days" marriage as a negotiation between two people, marriage was a familial economic planning activity involving the subjugation of women.  But women still bought in because it was the only way they could have sex without suffering community censure.

Answer:
Non-insult