In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

[Q]: Comment: Without going through the legal channels to change how the pay out is done, this is flat out illegal. 

So instead of local businesses and citizens infusing and stimulating OUR economy, he wants to pour 700M into a bucket with holess in it.

Blatant thievery. Gov. Walker.

You shame the office of Govenor and Alaska. You are guilty of HURTING the innocent and poor and taking that which does not belong to you to take.
[A]: Non-obscene


[Q]: Comment: Thing is, the cost of roads are covered by gas taxes, many times over.  I speak as someone who lives midtown and takes TTC and feel that as fellow Ontarians, suburbanites contribute a great deal to our city in many ways, and to the maintenance and development of transportation all over Ontario, at each fill up.  The fact that the City doesn't have funds to pay for the basic services of a city, including the creation and maintenance of infrastructure, means that the budget isn't allocating funds properly or primarily, that the province is not paying its fair share of gas taxes to Toronto.  Gas taxes should go to transit and infrastructure, period.  It'll only get worse thanks to Tory's stubbornness toward rebuilding the east Gardner and above all, sticking with subway rather than LRT in Scarborough.  Lots of money there.  Regardless, I think this is an issue of the province underfunding Toronto.  No tolls needed, gas taxes are already collected by the province.  Where are they going?
[A]: Non-obscene


[Q]: Comment: No Mr. Rhyner, the KKK and BLM are in no way similar. 

To say that is to be completely devoid of fact and history and opens yourself up for ridicule.
[A]:
Non-obscene