Categorize the comment on the basis of toxicity. If the comment is toxic (harmful, malicious, derogatory, threat, insult, identity attck, etc.) output Yes, otherwise output No.
--------
Question: The writer shouldn't feel too sorry for Chile because they turned against their home-grown socialist problem in the 1970s, rather than become another technological and economic backwater like Cuba.  Today Chile is arguably one of the best-run countries in the western hemisphere, economically and politically.  Arguably they are even more 'progressive' than the USA - after all, they have already elected a woman president!  ;-)

Chile is not a 'third-world' country by any stretch of the imagination, despite what the writer of this letter implies.

Answer: No


Question: Next, beer for women and gays made with sperm. Yuck to both!

Answer: Yes


Question: And I eat Wendy's twice a week and have a pro-grade cardiovascular system.

Genetics, circumstance, and moderation all matter, but by all means keep body-shaming people, hand-waving, and equating it somehow to the existence of fast food.

Answer:
No