In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Ex Input:
Comment: Hmmmn I wonder how the protestors got to the Dakota's to protest, could it be they walked or drove electric vehicles? Lot's of hipocrits in this schrade.

Ex Output:
Non-sexual-explicit


Ex Input:
Comment: Hogwash Gary - You cannot have your cake and eat it too. That is what I disrespect most about evolutionists, is the hypocrisy. If you are going to live by the sword, you must die by it. At least have the courage to admit and accept it. And why is sexual violence any more unacceptable that violence, the fact is you have no foundation as a Darwinist to condemn anything of this nature. If you are going to travel down this road, then you MUST defend animals we eat, and every other act of "violence" that imposes an outside will upon another being. I can discuss any topic rationally with any person, but hypocrisy is something I will not deal with.

Ex Output:
Non-sexual-explicit


Ex Input:
Comment: "By carrying UH women’s volleyball on OC 16, we’ve made it available to tens of thousands more Spectrum subscribers. Ultimately, increasing the total potential viewership of UH sports across the state, not just Oahu.”
Minus the 43,000 viewers you had previously on Hawaiian Telcom. WTF!!!!!

Yogaman is losing his namaste and feeling like giving some cracks!!!!!

Ex Output:

Non-sexual-explicit