We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

[Q]: The Senate's Sargent at Arms, and the assistant former director of the FBI says there is no way to prevent someone who is committed to carry it out.
[A]: Valid


[Q]: You would rather be confronted by a guy with a baseball bat because you are FAR more likely to get killed by the guy with the gun.
[A]: Valid


[Q]: 1) Does having laws regulating the the ability to carry concealed weapons violate the 2nd amendment of the constitution?
[A]:
Valid