In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Input: Consider Input: Comment: Well. Certainly no red flags there! Here,  take 2 guns and move along.

Output: Non-obscene


Input: Consider Input: Comment: After reading this crap, can't wait until election time!

Output: Obscene


Input: Consider Input: Comment: [Nope, just making sure no one gets the impression that because some off-season staffers were let go, the RNC was somehow financially insolvent]
Let me get this straight.  You worry that the first three words in the title in big bold letters: "ALASKA REPUBlCAN PARTY" is going to be confused with the Republican NATIONAL Committee? Even though the article talks about "outside funding," state chairman, etc. etc. etc. Yet you actually believe someone is capable of missing all the information and confuse the AK Republican Party with the Republican NATIONAL Committee?
I know you have an ability to ignore important facts when they are presented but I don't think it is reasonable or rational to project that on others.  I mean we take a lot of pride in Alaska being a big state but politically speaking I think it is safe to say everyone here recognizes how little we actually are and how unlikely it is that anyone is going to confuse the AK Republican Party with the Republican NATIONAL Committee.


Output: Non-obscene