In this task, you're given a pair of sentences, sentence 1 and sentence 2. Your job is to determine if the two sentences clearly agree/disagree with each other, or if this can't be determined. Indicate your answer as yes or no respectively.

Q: Sentence 1: Technology is transforming pro bono but there is a great deal to do, particularly as many legal assistance agencies still lack basic technology, such as Internet connections. Sentence 2: They needed to have more of their basic technology needs met.

A: no
****
Q: Sentence 1: His proved an appropriate choice, as he almost single-handedly created the mod?Υrn Turkish state. Sentence 2: He made the Turkish state with little effort involved, just having to make a decision.

A: no
****
Q: Sentence 1: His name looks an awful lot, on first glance, like Hannah Arendt, who, I'm fairly sure, never advocated sex with or violence to animals, at least, not in her published works. Sentence 2: Like Hannah Arendt his name looks awful a lot too because they are hard to pronounce.

A:
no
****