In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Comment: Any income they receive from their "story" should go towards the cost of rescue from their fraudulent experience.
Non-obscene

Comment: Notice the DP isn't carrying the Donna Brazile story at all?  They do everything they can to keep the sheep in the blind.
Non-obscene

Comment: North Korea continually violates all international treaties. NK has now launched five missiles that landed within less than 60 miles of Japan and within Japan's Exclusive Economic Zone. If NK had landed five missiles within less than 60 miles of Guam or HI or CA or OR or WA during Obama's administration, Democrats would skip Starbucks for their afternoon lattes in solidarity. 

The most recent NK missile was an ICBM with range capability to hit Guam, Hawaii, California, Washington, Oregon, Colorado, etc. with a potential nuclear payload. The new S. Korean President openly requested bilateral talks with NK and was uniformly rebuffed. Japan, S.Korea and U.S. have gotten nowhere with Kim JungUn and his regime. NK is intent on developing nuclear weapons and the capability to deliver them. Period. Once NK is nuclear armed, which will be very soon, I wonder how much perceptions will finally change.

Non-obscene