Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.

Input: Consider Input: Right.  Politically-expedient history revision.  Fascism is, and always has been since its inception, a right-wing political ideology.  It's proponents said so themselves.  They openly opposed left-wing political movements.  Frequently violently.  And while we're at it, black folks did not keep white folks as slaves, the Native Americans didn't cross the Atlantic and start slaughtering and dispossessing Europeans, European Jews didn't incinerate Lutherans in ovens or put them in death camps, American church women didn't rape and murder Salvadoran death squad goons and Saddam didn't have any yellow birthday cake--they ran out of yellow no. 5 food-coloring because of the sanctions.

Output: Yes


Input: Consider Input: I have no idea what he said.  My comment stems from carefully watching the video which pretty clearly shows the entire sequence of events.  The motorcyclist shows zero evidence of being aware of the pursuit until the police car hit him from behind when the motorist came to a full stop at an intersection.  At no time did the motorcyclist turn his head behind evidencing awareness of pursuit prior to being rear ended.  But these are only my conclusions based on careful viewing of the dashcam video.  Perhaps if you have a look you could see additional evidence that I missed.

Output: Yes


Input: Consider Input: The city is ANTI-car, period.  They would rather create a hindrance to traffic, in an attempt to force people to ride transit, etc.

The Hub housing project will accommodate over 500 residence (I believe it is 514), yet it only has 100 onsite parking spaces.  There is an "overflow" parking lot, but its a quarter mile east of the Hub.


Output: No