We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

[EX Q]: To support this open carry ban, you have argued that no right exists to carry a loaded handgun outside the home���making them useless and therefore the ban is just sweeping up the crumbs.
[EX A]: Valid

[EX Q]: Are you saying that the only reason there are criminals armed with guns is because we're not willing to accept gun prohibitions as the answer?
[EX A]: Valid

[EX Q]: The proper thing to do if one wishes to remove the rights guaranteed by the second amendment, is to repeal it, not for politically alinged judges to make rulings based on politics and ignoring all historical evidence to the contrary.
[EX A]:
Valid