In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

[Q]: Comment: There is an "International Organization FOR Migration"??? 
Good grief, how corrupt and perverse!  
How about an international effort to stop immigration crimes instead?
[A]: Non-sexual-explicit


[Q]: Comment: >>white supremacists fill comment forums with your waste products? Not sure Civil Comments is working out the way the G&M intended...
.
Victimhood and labels - that's how the left deals with opposing opinions.
[A]: Non-sexual-explicit


[Q]: Comment: Question??......since when should  celibate men tell men and women what to do with their sex lives.,..
only a doctor should handle this issue....pumping out children to fill the pews in the church is NOT
a celibates  roll...., married couple consult with their doctor about their sex life...., condoms are NOT
forbidden....show me where it says in cannon law that condoms can not be used?. i never saw this in my studies in Rome,...celibate priests telling married couples what to do with condoms or  is none of their business ...it is a doctors...dncrowley
[A]:
Sexual-explicit