In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

[EX Q]: Comment: maybe  if  you  kiss  my  ass  I'll put  a  good  word  in  for  you  at  the  welfare  office,  moocher.
[EX A]: Obscene

[EX Q]: Comment: First, faux-meats are kind of a misnomer: seitan and soy have been used for centuries as protein options for non meat-eaters in South and East Asia. Tofu is a food in itself. Seitan is a food in itself. They are used in dishes as substitutes for meat alternatives for centuries. There are faux-meat dishes in Asian restaurants that have just as long of a history as the meat-equivalent dishes themselves. To say that seitan has to be 100% like beef is ridiculous. 

Second, as many have pointed out, the point of a sloppy or diner food joint catering to vegans is because vegans don't SIMPLY PREFER BROCCOLI - they have cravings for oily, rich, and textured foods other than vegetables the same as meat eaters. The reason they eat non-meat things is for ETHICAL reasons. They refuse to continue to support killing living and pain-feeling beings for the sake of TASTE. 

Lastly, I think the reviewer came in with a mental block in mind. Hate for hipsters and "trendy" things leads this dinosaur review
[EX A]: Non-obscene

[EX Q]: Comment: I guess those poor white folks in Appalachia will have to hope that the French, Doctors Without Borders will return to treat them. They did that before the passage of the ACA. I saw it on 60 Minutes.
[EX A]:
Non-obscene