We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gay Marriage)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Q: Sent1: Nor does this exclusion rationally further the State's legitimate interest in encouraging heterosexual married couples to procreate.
 Sent2: If the state has a legitimate state interest, then discrimination is justified.

A: Not similar
****
Q: Sent1: If inclusion of same sex couples being allowed to marry is what you call "redefining", then the inclusion of interracial couples would also be a "redefiniton."
 Sent2: The crock is how you will do anything but allow people to decide for themselves if they will call a same-sex union marriage.

A: Not similar
****
Q: Sent1: I agree that IF gay marriage is made legal it should be done through the legislature and not the courts.
 Sent2: if homosexual couples pass the existing legal definition of marriage, why not ?

A:
Not similar
****