instruction:
In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.
question:
Comment: The Chinese do not make mistakes when it comes to protocol. Forcing Obama out the ass of the plane was planed. Another sad day for world diplomacy.
answer:
Obscene


question:
Comment: Thanks for the historical perspective. Always worth while.
Whom the gods would destroy they first drive mad. We already have the  mad part of Trump covered.
answer:
Non-obscene


question:
Comment: Mr. Keller's article is misleading.  For example, he omits to mention that the small-business tax reforms will end "income sprinkling." So his analysis is not accurate. Is this inaccuracy the result of bias or carelessness?  And the Globe wants to have it both ways.  It has crusaded against the earlier proposed tax reforms.  Now that it has what it wants and the government has backed off some of them, it is now attacking the government for thus listening and backing off.  Damned if you do, damned if you don't.  Is that reasonable or fair-minded journalism? The Globe officially endorsed Stephen Harper in the last election and in several before that. It is basically a mouthpiece for the Conservative party, and everything in it needs to be filtered by its readers accordingly.
answer:

Obscene