We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gay Marriage)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Example Input: Sent1: But those who want to engage in same-sex marriage do care.
 Sent2: Kronus is right the people, who don't like same sex marriage, want to deny samesex couples marriage, even though there is nothing in the law, or constitution that says same sex couples can't be married.
Example Output: Not similar

Example Input: Sent1: Changing the current state of marriage to allow same sex marriage will not effect straight marriages at all.
 Sent2: There is precidence for marriages not being recognized state to state, outside of same sex marriage.
Example Output: Not similar

Example Input: Sent1: Civil unions would probably bring on the same financial problems that gay marriage would, although I don't agree with JP on all of this.
 Sent2: What I am saying is that if the term "civil union" was utilized unilatterally, meaning for all legal unions gay or straight, I would have no problem with it.
Example Output:
Not similar