Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.

[Q]: I was actually a little confused by my verse, "while the weak person eats only vegetables." It sounded more like an anti-vegetarian view, but I assume it has something to do with the arbitrary rules of different sects.
[A]: Yes


[Q]: Jade: "modesly" is actually an innovative contraction peculiar to discussion of housing patterns, urban demographics and inner-city residential development.  Its etymology is traced to discussion of "more densely" developed urban centers especially in reference to residential units.  In today's usage you might read "modesly" devloped city centers generally promote more affordable urban residential tenancy.   Indeed, it is an esoteric term and it's not surprising it causes some confusion.  

You may be thinking of "scrupub", which, in contemporary use, refers to policies and legislation designed to benefit a small special interest group by "screwing the public."
[A]: No


[Q]: RR? Do you truely believe what you are saying. You tout the Bill of Rights and Contitution all over over sites, but you deny a persons right to choose for his own body. Believe me if you ever went through chemo or lived with debilitating pain you would do just about anything to be able to feel better. Morphine, Oxy, and Codiene are drugs that keep most so out of it you can't function. I have watched cancer patients and others use pot. Other than raiding the frig for munchies, they function better than many who are sober! Forget alcohol. It should be classified as a level 1 dangerous drug. That crap about pot leading to harder drugs? Well those trashy people who use hard drugs are those who would do it anyway regardless if pot wasn't available. You know the idiot huffers of spray cans. Remember the Pam stupido's!
[A]:
Yes