Given a document, an entity and its sentiment towards the entity, verify if it is the correct sentiment towards the entity. Answer should be yes or no. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

Q: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Pope Francis Letter is Negative . Well  it’s now happened.  The great scandal of the modern Catholic Church  —  its  tolerance for clergy who abuse children  and  its  laxity when dealing with bishops who themselves tolerated or enabled priest-abusers — now touches directly on  the pope himself .
 It ’s worth laying out the timeline clearly. In 2015  Pope Francis appointed Juan Barros Madrid to the bishopric of Osorno  Chile. The appointment was met with local protests  among Catholics and non-Catholics who believed that Barros was implicated in the crimes of child sexual abuse committed by his friend Father Fernando Karadima  a prominent Chilean churchman who habitually kissed and fondled boys. In the days after the installation of Barros at Osono  Pope Francis told an archbishop that there was “no objective reason at all” to oppose the appointment. The Vatican’s own department governing these matters  the Congregation for Bishops  released a statement saying they had “carefully examined the prelate’s candidature and did not find objective reasons to preclude the appointment.”
In the months following the appointment   Pope Francis  became extremely dismissive of complaints. “Osorno suffers  yes  for silliness ”  the pope  said of the outrage in the media. “Think with your head  and do not be carried away by the noses of the leftists  who are the ones who put this thing together ” he added.
A few weeks ago   Pope Francis ’s visit to Chile was marked by protests  and  the pope  continued  his  extremely brusque dismissal. “The day I see proof against Bishop Barros  then I will talk ” the pontiff said. “There is not a single piece of evidence against  him . It is all slander. Is that clear?”  Francis  said that no victims had come forward to  him . It was apparently this statement that caused Cardinal Sean O’Malley of Boston to scramble down to Chile and meet with the pope. After O’Malley’s intervention  presumably  the pope issued a half-apology  but repeated that the accusations against Barros were “slander” before adding  “I’m convinced he’s innocent.”
And now the news drops. In the time between the pope’s appointment of Barros and his commentary about protesters being carried away by leftists  members of the Vatican’s own Commission for the Protection of Minors gathered to discuss the appointment. They had a representative hand-deliver a letter to Pope Francis  from Carlos Cruz. The letter alleged  in lurid detail  that Barros had personally witnessed the abuse of Cruz at Karadima’s hands. Members of the commission photographed the hand-off of the letter to  the pope   to reassure Cruz that they were doing everything possible to make his cry for justice heard.
The facts as we know them leave us with a few interpretations. 1)  Pope Francis  simply never read the letter  ignoring this extraordinary intervention by the Vatican’s own commission on a matter of public controversy for  his  pontificate. 2)  Francis  read the letter but forgot about it  reverting to  his  original understanding of the case. 3)  Francis  read the letter  but stuck to  his  decision for Barros  committing unintentional or intentional deceptions about the state of  his  knowledge of the accusations. 4)  He  read the letter  but either doubted the accusations in it  or at least found them so unimpressive that  he  did not decide to follow up on them.
The first explanation would mean that  Francis  was culpably ignorant. The second that  he  may lack the mental or moral faculties to competently govern the Catholic Church. The third that  he  is too stubborn or vain to change course in the face of evidence. And the last that  he  has little trust or faith in the Commission on the Protection of Minors to pass on credible counsel to  him . Perhaps more reporting or disclosure will change our understanding  but none of these are satisfactory.

A: no
****
Q: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Albu Kamal is Positive . Beirut (AFP) â Syrian troops and allied militiamen entered  the jihadist-held town of Albu Kamal  on Wednesday  state media said  edging closer to ousting the Islamic State group from its last urban stronghold in the country.
 Albu Kamal  lies on the Syrian side of the border with Iraq  in the oil-rich eastern province of Deir Ezzor.
Entry to  Albu Kamal  follows a series of stunningly quick defeats for IS in the province as well as the jihadistsâ loss of their de facto capital Raqa further north.
âArmy troops and allied forces broke through Daesh (IS) defences and entered Albu Kamal  waging fierce battles inside  the town  â state news agency SANA reported.
Syrian regime forces  backed by intensive Russian air strikes  have steadily advanced on  Albu Kamal  from the south and west for weeks.
âThe advance towards  Albu Kamal  came after army troops and their allies met up with Iraqi forces at the border between the two countries â SANA said.
A source from militias allied to Damascus told AFP that fighters from Lebanonâs pro-regime Hezbollah movement had advanced to the southern edges of  Albu Kamal  on Wednesday.
âPart of those units crossed into Iraq  with the help of Hashed al-Shaabi units  to circle around  Albu Kamal  and reach the northern side of the town â the source added.
But the jihadist group has seen that territory shrink to a small pocket along the Euphrates River  with  Albu Kamal  as  its  final hub.
In recent weeks  an estimated 120 000 people have been displaced from  Albu Kamal  alone  said Linda Tom from the United Nationsâ humanitarian affairs coordination office in Damascus.

A: no
****
Q: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Paul Khairy is Neutral . The excitement of sports is likely responsible for the observed increases in heart rate  said study author Dr. Paul Khairy  a cardiologist at the Montreal Heart Institute.
But the new study is the first to demonstrate that the ambience of a live game â being surrounded by cheering fans  being closer to the action and experiencing an increased level of engagement â may all contribute to the heightened emotional stress response in fans   Khairy  told Live Science.
In the study  the heart rates of fans who watched a hockey game in person increased by 110 percent  on average  from their resting heart rates. That's comparable to the increase you'd see in someone running  jumping rope or doing any other vigorous form of exercise   Khairy  said.
Fans who watched the same game on TV had a 75 percent increase in their heart rates  on average  which is similar to the heart rates seen with moderate physical activity  such as a casual bike ride   Khairy  noted.
Surprisingly  a person's interest in the sport and engagement as a fan were not linked to changes in heart rate during the game   Khairy  said. However   he  added that  he  suspects there might have been a different result if researchers had developed their own way to measure passion in hockey fans rather than adapting a tool originally designed for soccer spectators.
Although fans watching any sport can experience a similar amount of excitement as was observed in this group of hockey enthusiasts  these results may not apply to other sports   Khairy  said. There are too many elements that differ among sports â such as the pace of the game  a fan's emotional attachment to a team  and even the number of high-intensity moments â that prevent researchers from making similar generalizations   he  said.
A fan's emotional reaction to a game can be intense   Khairy  said  and that could trigger cardiovascular problems.
Fans who experience cardiac symptoms during a game should seek immediate medical attention rather than waiting for a convenient moment  such as in-between periods   Khairy  said. Many arenas and ice rinks have cardiac defibrillators on hand  as well as people trained in using them   he  added.

A:
yes
****