In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

[EX Q]: Comment: "the men"? You mean the bishops? Prove they don't love homosexuals. Prove it. Homosexual activity is evil. Its simple. All people are to be loved, not used as objects. Homosexual activity uses another person as an object to masturbate with.  Not so nice!
[EX A]: Identity-attack

[EX Q]: Comment: Hmmmmm.
Let me see.  Someone to the south of us was just judged best suited for the task of the presidency solely because of his business background.
And he was celebrated during the campaign because he didn't "come across as "wishy washy."
That ain't working out too well. 
Maybe we should apply some other criteria when selecting these guys.
To quote Betrand Russell:
"The trouble with the world is that the stupid are cocksure and the intelligent are full of doubt."
[EX A]: Non-identity-attack

[EX Q]: Comment: Democrat mantra: “If you’re not pro gay…stay the hell away."
[EX A]:
Identity-attack