We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

[EX Q]: Sent1: If this is the case then gun control laws will have no effect on who carries melee weapons, so you argument falls apart because 'the law abiding' can remain armed.
 Sent2: IF you previously had laws that made openly carrying weapons illegal, and you then pass a concealed carry law, if somebody is carrying a gun and it is not concealed, they are breaking the law.
[EX A]: Not similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: Would you want your children to go to a school where everyone was allowed to have a gun?
 Sent2: The fact that you like cars is why you will tolerate the fact that more kids are killed by cars then guns.
[EX A]: Not similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: Gun control makes criminals lives much easier, because they can keep their guns, while they don't have to deal with armed citizens.
 Sent2: That will take the criminals off the street and with them off the street there are no gun control concerns.
[EX A]:
Not similar