We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Example Input: Sent1: The murder rate for the state of New York, a state without the death penalty has increased this year with a higher rate of murder than it was in 2009.
 Sent2: Moreover, states without the death penalty have much lower murder rates.
Example Output: Similar

Example Input: Sent1: With trials and appeals, one execution can end up costing more than a life sentence by the time the execution is actually carried out.
 Sent2: Life imprisonment without parole is more effective than execution, and it is cheaper.
Example Output: Not similar

Example Input: Sent1: If we can not prevent the innocent from unjust punishment, we should not have the death penalty.
 Sent2: By the same token, if we keep administering the death penalty while the system is broken, we will have a much greater risk of putting someone innocent to death.
Example Output:
Similar