The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the small-talk strategy, otherwise output No. small-talk is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used for discussing topics apart from the negotiation, in an attempt to build a rapport with the opponent. For example, discussing how the opponent is doing during the pandemic or sharing excitement for the camping trip.
--------
Question: Context: 'I can understand that. I know I really need the food the most. I'm already worried I'm going to run out. I also have blood sugar problems, so I cannot run out ☹️' 'Thats fine. If you want you can have 2 foods and I get 2 of the fire wood. Sounds fair?' 'And I would take 3 water? '
Utterance: 'That would be a problem since I need the water too. I was hoping that since you got 2 foods ill get the 2 waters'

Answer: No


Question: Context: 'you are right we both need the wood, how about i give 1 wood, all of my water and 2 food and you give 2 wood and 1 food?' 'Where are you camping? Perhaps we can compromise by having our tents nearby each other, which would be like we each get three firewood? I am not willing to trade my package of marshmallows, though.' 'i hope we can come to a compromise 🙂, what is another priority of yours besides the wood?'
Utterance: 'Food is a second priority for me, as I will be metal-detecting as well, & cannot risk fainting from the heat. How about I give you two firewood (I don't think we can "share", haha), you can give me two food packages, and two water packages.'

Answer: No


Question: Context: 
Utterance: 'Hello, I'd like to bring three packages of firewood because I'll be making tons of BBQ for the camping trip.'

Answer:
No