Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.

Input: Consider Input: I'm not an Alaskan or a Dem. I am a left wing but consider myself an independent. I support Bernie Sanders policies not Bernie Sanders.  I am sick of never having the policies I believe in delivered.  The country had drifted right cos the Dems have drifted right. There is only one way for me too hold the Dems accountable for the drift right that has been going on for 30 years.  Donald Trump is a 4 year problem.  If I don't support the Dems in this election then they might stop with the "hippie punching" and screwing over the base which they have been doing for 30 years. 

Part of me hopes Trump wins just to get the people who brought us to this place out of office. As much as I don't want Trump, I don't want more of the same.  And that's clearly what you are offering me in HRC.

Output: No


Input: Consider Input: Editorial corrections are late to the party.  If you write a letter to the RG, be advised that it will get "filtered" and modified thru an editor's opinion even if it doesn't improve the clarity of your opinion.  More often than not, it detracts from the intent of the author, as in this case.  They also omit entire sentences for their own reasons.  It's very condescending and similar to dogs marking fire hydrants.

Some letters might need spiffing for grammar and spelling but wholesale edits and omissions amount to censoring.

Output: No


Input: Consider Input: Are you kidding me ?  UAA has to cut their sports budget , so how do they respond ?  By bringing in an out of country skier .  Why does UAA even have a ski team ?  To give free college education to someone from another country while our own students have to pay higher tuition rates ?


Output: No