Given a document, an entity and its sentiment towards the entity, verify if it is the correct sentiment towards the entity. Answer should be yes or no. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

[Q]: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Kim Jong Un is Positive . SEOUL (Reuters) - The light-grey suit and matching tie that  North Korea’s Kim Jong Un  donned for  his  New Year’s address was likely carefully calculated to project a softer  more relaxed image to go with  his  surprise offer for talks with Seoul.
Departing from  his  usual black or navy suits  Kim gave  his  televised speech wearing black-rimmed glasses and slicked back hair  speaking fluently and rarely looking down to read as  he  raised the possibility of sending a delegation to the upcoming Winter Olympics in South Korea.
“In this New Year’s address  North Korea seems to have taken great pains with the image portrayed by Kim Jong Un ” said an analysis by the state-run Korea Institute for National Unification after  Kim ’s speech.
“The change from the previous dark Maoist suits to a softer toned grey Western-style suit likely aimed to underpin peace  which  Kim  stressed in  his  address ” the institute said.
It added that  Kim ’s style “reflected a relaxed state of mind” that likely resulted from  his  previous announcement that North Korea had achieved its nuclear ambitions.
After a year dominated by fiery rhetoric and escalating tensions over Pyongyang’s nuclear weapons programme   Kim  declared Monday that  his  country was “a peace-loving and responsible nuclear power” and called for lowering military tensions and improving ties with the South.
 Kim  also said  he  was open to dialogue with Seoul  prompting South Korea on Tuesday to propose high-level talks between the two countries on Jan. 9 at the border truce village of Panmunjeom.
FILE PHOTO: North Korean leader Kim Jong Un waves to people attending a military parade marking the 105th birth anniversary of country's founding father  Kim Il Sung in Pyongyang  April 15  2017. REUTERS/Damir Sagolj
Analysts said the North Korean leader’s speech on Monday showed more confidence compared to previous years  his old habit of swaying from side to side while making speeches nearly undetectable. In his first New Year’s address as North Korea’s leader in 2013   Kim  frequently sounded short of breath  his voice wavering from time to time.
 Kim  made  his  maiden public address in April 15  2012 at a parade marking the centenary of  his  grandfather’s birth. This year  there was none of the uneasiness that marked that speech and  his  subsequent public addresses.
 His  voice   his  hair shaved on the side  as well as  his  light-colored Western-style suit and glasses  were also reminiscent of  his  grandfather  Kim Il Sung  according to defectors and analysts. Kim Il Sung had a more gregarious and popular image than  Kim Jong Un’s  reclusive father  Kim Jong Il.
 Kim Jong Un  has embraced New Year addresses as a chance to outline  his  policies and rally the North Korean people. Last year   he  used  his  speech to declare that North Korea was in the “final stages” of perfecting an intercontinental ballistic missile.
Kim Gun-hee  a consultant on image making and leadership  said the grey suit may have been designed to deflect some of the negative global attention  Kim ’s nuclear and missile tests have prompted.
“When we advise clients who are in tough situations or are surrounded by unfavourable rumours  we tell them to wear either white or grey ”  she  said.
“In the study of color psychology  white imbues innocence while grey tends to take attention away from you.  Kim  may have felt some pressure from being at the centre of global focus and turned to grey after sticking to dark tones for several years.”
[A]: yes


[Q]: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Mirai Nagasu is Neutral . But the most magical and pivotal contribution came from  Mirai Nagasu   and it was over in an instant. In the span of one glorious eyeblink  Nagasu  who had been snubbed by U.S. skating officials for a spot on the 2014 Olympic team  poured all she had worked toward these past four years into the opening jump of her free skate on the final day of the team competition.
And when she landed solidly on one foot  after making 3Â½ rotations in the air   Nagasu  made history  becoming the first American women to land the high-risk triple axel in Olympic competition.
âYou did it  girl!â screamed her teammate  pairs skater Alexa Scimeca-Knierim  from the U.S. teamâs rinkside seats  loud enough for  Nagasu  to hear as she went into her final jump. She giggled to herself  which made her smile even broader.
âItâs historical and something no one can take away from me â  Nagasu  said afterward. âI wanted to make America proud.â
The womenâs skate represented the moment  Nagasu  had waited for since  her  fourth-place finish at the 2010 Vancouver Games.
 She  awoke at 4 a.m.  nervous about shouldering such a responsibility for  her  teammates and  her  country. But  she  didnât give a thought to omitting the risky triple axel. That jump â and the prospect of becoming the first American and just the third woman in history to land it at the Olympics  after Japanâs Midori Ito and Mao Asada â was the sole reason  she  kept training after being passed over for the 2014 Olympic team. Even before  she  could do the triple axel   she  dreamed  she  could.  She  dreamed of landing it so much  in fact  that  she  thinks  she  may have taught it to  herself  subliminally.
The falls  the bruises and aches over the years attest otherwise. But Monday was  her  moment. It was  her  vindication.
âMidori Ito  Mao Asada and now  Mirai Nagasu  â all Japanese heritage â  Nagasu  said afterward  with a proud smile. âBut I am fortunate that I am American  so Iâll be the first U.S. lady to have landed the triple axel [in Olympic competition]. So today is a day of accomplishment for me.â
[A]: no


[Q]: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Steve Bannon is Positive . The Dec. 12 special Senate election in Alabama is being touted as the next clash in the ongoing battle between  Steve Bannon  and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell for the soul of the Republican Partyâwhat  Bannon   with characteristic hyperbole  calls a âseason of war.â Roy Moore  the GOP candidate  stands accused of numerous incidents of sexual misconduct  including allegations that he molested a 14-year-old girl. Thatâs prompted McConnell  a Kentucky Republican  and most of his GOP colleagues to disavow him.  Bannon   by contrast  was Mooreâs most important ally in the wake of the sex scandal  at least until President Donald Trump took to Twitter to weigh in on Mooreâs behalf.
McConnell knows that having an accused child molester in the Senate would be toxic for his partyâs image  and that Mooreâs stubborn recklessness would make his own job next to impossible. For  Bannon   one suspects  this is the whole source of Mooreâs appeal.
Bannonâs stated rationale for backing Moore is that heâll help carry out the populist revolt that the former White House chief strategist is attempting to lead against McConnell and the GOP establishment. Itâs an odd claim to make  since Moore is less of a âpopulistâ than a âtheocrat.â He was twice kicked off the Alabama Supreme Court  once for refusing to remove a Ten Commandments monument  the other time for refusing to grant marriage licenses to gay couples. Whatâs more   Bannon  has a more powerful weapon to deploy that really does align with  his  professed politics and would all but ruin McConnell:  He  could oppose the Republican tax plan.
 Bannon  rose to prominence by espousing a brand of Republican politics that differed sharply from what party leaders such as McConnell and House Speaker Paul Ryan were pushing. Instead of tax cuts for the wealthy and slashed entitlement spending   Bannon  thought the GOP should become a âworkersâ partyâ focused on strengthening the middle class. This idea was so popular with conservative voters that when Trump took it up  he won the Republican presidential nomination. It also helped  him  steal blue-collar voters from Hillary Clinton in the general election.
Since  his  inauguration  however  Trump has consistently deferred to the same Republican leaders whose priorities  he  exposed as being out of step with the rest of the country. Nothing illustrates this better than the tax plan McConnell and his allies are frantically trying to rush through the Senate.
In sum  the GOP tax plan makes a mockery of what  Bannon  and  his  followers claim to stand for by directing its major benefits to the kind of plutocrats who donate to McConnell and his Republican colleaguesâone reason the plan is deeply unpopular with most voters. A recent ABC News poll found that 60 percent of Americans think the plan favors the wealthy  and just one in three support it.
So far  Bannonâs populist revolt has met with only middling success. Although heâs pledged to run insurgents in 2018 against every GOP incumbent but Ted Cruz  a strong slate of candidates has yet to emerge. One place  Bannon  has succeeded  though  is in tarnishing McConnellâs image among Republicans. Polls consistently show the majority leader to be the least popular member of the Senate  and an Oct. 24 Harvard-Harris poll found that most Republicans wish  he  would resign. If McConnell canât pass a tax bill  he may have to.
Given this vulnerability   Bannon  could use his influence and platform at Breitbart News to highlight the plutocratic skew of the GOP plan and demand that its spoils be redirected to the ordinary workers who elected Trump. Calling on Republicans to swap out the estate tax repeal  carried interest breaks and cuts for millionaires for  say  a payroll tax cut aimed squarely at the middle class would put McConnell in an impossible bind  while providing  Bannon  the dual benefits of being broadly popular and entirely consistent with  his  and Trumpâs 2016 campaign message.
Instead   Bannon  has been raging at McConnell without doing much to inhibit his agenda. He may yet carry Moore to victory. But if McConnellâs tax plan becomes law  thereâll be little doubt as to who is the true victor.
[A]:
yes