We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Example Input: Sent1: But the statistics don't support the idea that the death penalty is any more effective as a detterent than is a life sentence.
 Sent2: It seems that those that would be deterred by fear of punishment are already dettered by the threat of a life sentence.
Example Output: Similar

Example Input: Sent1: If the execution rate decreased and the murder rate increased then that explains the deterrence effect of capital punishment.
 Sent2: Well according to your own paper, it says that you can't prove that the death penalty increases the murder rate.
Example Output: Similar

Example Input: Sent1: We should not even have the death penalty just on the off chance that we might execute somebody who is innocent.
 Sent2: People use the argument that we should not execute people based on the possibility that they may be innocent, but they could care less if we lock someone up for life who may be innocent.
Example Output:
Similar