In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence can be inferred from the statement. Incorrect choices change the meaning in important ways or have details that are not mentioned in the statement. Indicate your answer as 1,2, or 3 corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.

Input: Consider Input: Statement: And it is impossible to see how this difference from Rust has any bearing upon the First Amendment question, which, to repeat, is whether the funding scheme is 'manipulated' to have a 'coercive effect' on those who do not hold the subsidized position. Choices:  1. It is not possible to see how this difference from Rust has any bearing on the First Amendment question. 2. The difference from Rust on the First Amendment question is very noticeable. 3. The question that was asked it really rather very subjective.

Output: 1


Input: Consider Input: Statement: And I could see Lincoln's point, and I could agree with that. Choices:  1. I understood what Lincoln was trying to say as he gave his speech and I agreed with most parts.  2. I couldn't understand Lincoln and completely disagreed with him. 3. I could see where Lincoln was coming from and I agreed with it. 

Output: 3


Input: Consider Input: Statement: A gun is still useful, worth money, if he who picks it up from beside the dead does not want it for himself. Choices:  1. A gun is useless if it is not in the hands of the dead man.  2. Most guns will go for a good price these days. 3. A firearm can still be useful and sold for money.


Output: 3