TASK DEFINITION: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.
PROBLEM: If we focused on the death penalty in the trial, we wouldn't have those costs.

SOLUTION: Valid

PROBLEM: If one innocent life was killed by the DP, then that means everyone who supports the death penalty deserves death, and thats the paradox of the death penalty.

SOLUTION: Valid

PROBLEM: And 83% seems to be the common error rate for "innocents" claims by death penalty opponents.

SOLUTION:
Valid