instruction:
Categorize the comment on the basis of toxicity. If the comment is toxic (harmful, malicious, derogatory, threat, insult, identity attck, etc.) output Yes, otherwise output No.
question:
This tax raises $21 million a year when according to the city they need at least $200 million a year over ten years to deal with the decades long neglect to our streets.   Until the council comes up with priority budgeting out of existing revenue streams (utility franchise fees and general fund money) of at least $100 million annually this accomplishes absolutely nothing.  JUST VOTE NO on this idiotic scheme.
answer:
Yes


question:
also Robert, perhaps an on instance of the pot calling the kettle black, but I find it hard to follow your post. i'm guessing you think fast and get ahead of yourself when posting......****   I do believe the old city hall  of springfield was used longer than 2 years.  I also recollect it had structural problems and had to be abandoned. (from memory - didn't google)***people living downtown springfield...city failed.  what?  I see a good spot for a super market - I believe it is called a "black hole" in marketing.  also main street, that had such a bad rep,  is being reformed...the theater, new storefronts...***shenanigans in springfield's inner political machine seems minimal, especially compared to Eugene.**right now glenwood is a blight - it will not be very soon.   careful development of that riverside can make it a real gem like san Antonio's canal.  I think getting st paul's involved , even as esteemed consultant, is a great idea as they are good at erecting low income housing.
answer:
No


question:
Ugh. That True guy is the worst. He created some fantasy about an indigenous people steeped in Noble Savage-style racism, then ran himself to death because he didn't want to grow up. Should not be famous and definitely should not be thought of as a good example worthy of study. And the "minimalist" trend is over, now we're on to something equally stupid.
answer:

Yes