In this task, based on the given context word, you are asked to create a pair of sentences each containing a blank (_). The sentence pair should look similar and should be about two different persons (PersonX and PersonY). Additionally, the two sentences must be different in terms of trigger words (e.g., "sympathetic" and "stern") which express contrasting attributes about the two persons. The answer to the first and the second sentence must be PersonX and PersonY, respectively. PersonX and PersonY should not be equally likely to fill the blank. For each sentence, there should be an agreed upon answer to fill in the blank. Your generations should NOT contain potentially explicit, offensive, or adult content. Do not use the names of real people (e.g., Donald Trump, Putin, etc.) in your sentences. Avoid repeating the same style or phrase in twin sentences e.g., a contrasting sentence can always be created using simple negation i.e. by adding not, never, etc. Instead, try to increase diversity. Both twin sentences must contain at least 15 and at most 30 words. Twin sentences must have at least 70% overlapping words. You must utilize the given context word while writing the twin sentences. Each of the twin sentences must contain only one blank. Make sure that PersonX and PersonY have the same gender. In each sentence, PersonX and PersonY should be used only ONCE and PersonX should appear earlier than PersonY.

Q: Context Word: brow.

A: Sentence 1: Plucking the brow took longer for PersonX compared to PersonY because _ had a uni-brow. 
Sentence 2: Plucking the brow took longer for PersonX compared to PersonY because _ had a thin brow.
****
Q: Context Word: sheep.

A: Sentence 1: The sheep belonging to PersonX had longer fur than those belonging to PersonY because _ never sheared theirs. 
Sentence 2: The sheep belonging to PersonX had shorter fur than those belonging to PersonY because _ never sheared theirs.
****
Q: Context Word: evidence.

A:
Sentence 1: Making sense of evidence came naturally to PersonX but not PersonY because _ had gone to law school. 
Sentence 2: Making sense of evidence came naturally to PersonX but not PersonY because _ had not gone to law school.
****