In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: toxic and non-toxic. Toxicity is defiend as anything that is rude, disrespectful, or unreasonable that would make someone want to leave a converation.

[EX Q]: Comment: Take two Valium and call me next summer.
[EX A]: Non-toxic

[EX Q]: Comment: Guest: "For 2 years running JD Powers has these same models"
.
That's funny. Not long ago, you described the problems per vehicles as "not worth mentioning". Why did you mention JD Power now?
[EX A]: Non-toxic

[EX Q]: Comment: MC, First, this site purports to use some mix of "NEA, job survey and private data" to come up with their numbers. In their own words, it's "tricky business". Second, the numbers aren't actual salaries, but are a "comfort index" which tries to give a weighted metric vis a vis cost of living(which can vary a lot within states). Hardly "hard data" to make a policy decision off of, but perhaps useful for rookie teachers looking for work, maybe.  Just having starting and average salaries doesn't tell you the whole story. Averages can be skewed by very  high/low earners, a more useful number is median salary. And again, it doesn't address the total compensation issue, or any other factors that are involved that make one state's situation different from anothers. Still waiting for that comprehensive study to be dug up. I think I'll be waiting a while.
[EX A]:
Non-toxic