In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: threat and non-threat. Threat is a statement that someone will be hurt or harmed, especially if the person does not do something in particular.

Example Input: Comment: Floyd received a ticket because the police lost face; that's it. If he was speeding, the police need to have him on radar some other accepted method to actually track his speed, and then it's their choice if they issue him a ticket for speeding. The police officer has to actually see him driving recklessly as well, and I am pretty sure the officer was not chasing Floyd and the car thief at the same time; he probably came after the fact and issued him the citation. It will be interesting to hear the officer lie under oath come the court date. Meanwhile, the DA is thinking of every angle to get this hardened threat to society to just pay the ticket and throw every resource at him to fold like a cheap suit.
Example Output: Non-threat

Example Input: Comment: Whether I think a "political campaign should be carried out by 140 character tweets" or whether you do is irrelevant.  HIs Tweets worked.  He is the President-elect. 

 He didn't want to stay out the media; he wanted Free media; and he got it.

The Carnegie Mellon analysis is irrelevant to his results.  The US Army had to 'dumb down' its training to the 8th grade reading level when we went All Volunteer army in the 1980's.  And IQs have been steadily dropping since.  

Who do you think Motor Voter and other 'increase the number of voters' programs  were registering to vote?  Rhodes' Scholars and PhD Candidates?   Nope.  A lot of people who were either too disinterested or too ignorant to bother makes up that kind of registration.
Example Output: Non-threat

Example Input: Comment: Good move this clown probably has nothing to loose and you probably do
Example Output:
Non-threat