In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

Q: Sentence: Dan had to stop Bill from toying with the injured bird. He is very cruel.
 Reason: The 'He' refers to bill because he was the 'big brother' to the bird. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

A: Wrong
****
Q: Sentence: I put the heavy book on the table and it broke.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the table because The butterfly wing is referred to as the pronoun here a word that can function by itself as a noun phrase and that refers either to the participants in the discourse. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

A: Wrong
****
Q: Sentence: Dan had to stop Bill from toying with the injured bird. He is very compassionate.
 Reason: The 'He' refers to dan because Bill is the one toying, not dan. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

A:
Correct
****