Categorize the comment on the basis of toxicity. If the comment is toxic (harmful, malicious, derogatory, threat, insult, identity attck, etc.) output Yes, otherwise output No.

Q: Why the Rep's out?  It's the Governors plan, vote him out if you don't like it. He also wants an income tax as well.

A: No
****
Q: Don't get too carried away, Kearon, with your radical assumptions.  Apparently there's reports that the shooter was GAY.  Sooooo, it happens to be a shooter was a wannabe gay individual and couldn't fit in with the gay crowd.  Sounds like too much is being emphasized on him being Muslim with Afghanistan ancestral roots.  Heck, Kearon, with all the radical, over the cliff comments that you've singlehandedly made on this site, you should be investigated.  I'll bet KK is an alias.  Really.

A: Yes
****
Q: "To find a better health-care model, we don’t have to turn our gaze north, in the usual direction, to Canada, or across the pond to the UK and other European countries, or even limit ourselves to calling for “Medicare for all.” Eight million of us already have something better than Medicare and more akin to the UK’s National Health Service, right here, in America—with the private-insurance industry almost completely eliminated from the equation. The real question we need to ask was posed just last month by an obviously impressed UK physician, during an NHS study visit to the VHA in West Haven: “Why,” he wondered out loud, “do you have to be a veteran to get this level of care in America? Why isn’t it available to all Americans?” Why indeed. "

http://prospect.org/article/why-veterans-health-system-better-you-think

A:
No
****