We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Q: Sent1: If someone killed my relative, I wouldn't want them killed, I would want them to spend the rest of their lives in hard, back breaking labor.
 Sent2: I see no point in letting someone live who does not want to live, or letting someone die who does not want to die.

A: Not similar
****
Q: Sent1: A little faith in the system, after all, it is good enough to sentence someone to LWOP.
 Sent2: If the system is good enough to send someone to prison for life, it should be good enough to send them to death row.

A: Not similar
****
Q: Sent1: I have evidence that says that innocent people are convicted of crimes.
 Sent2: Many, many people have already been exonerated AFTER being convicted of a capital crime.

A:
Similar
****