In this task, you will be presented with a context from an academic paper and a question separated with a 
. You have to answer the question based on the context.

Ex Input:
(2) Different from LEM and DPEMM, AEM uses a generator network to capture the event-related patterns and is able to mine events from different text sources (short and long). Moreover, unlike traditional inference procedure, such as Gibbs sampling used in LEM and DPEMM, AEM could extract the events more efficiently due to the CUDA acceleration; 
 Question: What alternative to Gibbs sampling is used?

Ex Output:
generator network to capture the event-related patterns


Ex Input:
We address this issue by We address this issue by examining and reviewing publicly available datasets for abusive content detection, which we provide access to on a new dedicated website, hatespeechdata.com. We address this issue by examining and reviewing publicly available datasets for abusive content detection, which we provide access to on a new dedicated website, hatespeechdata.com. 
 Question: What is open website for cataloguing abusive language data?

Ex Output:
hatespeechdata.com


Ex Input:
Across all languages, 145 human annotators were asked to score all 1,888 pairs (in their given language). We finally collect at least ten valid annotations for each word pair in each language. All annotators were required to abide by the following instructions:

1. Each annotator must assign an integer score between 0 and 6 (inclusive) indicating how semantically similar the two words in a given pair are. A score of 6 indicates very high similarity (i.e., perfect synonymy), while zero indicates no similarity.

2. Each annotator must score the entire set of 1,888 pairs in the dataset. The pairs must not be shared between different annotators.

3. Annotators are able to break the workload over a period of approximately 2-3 weeks, and are able to use external sources (e.g. dictionaries, thesauri, WordNet) if required.

4. Annotators are kept anonymous, and are not able to communicate with each other during the annotation process. 
 Question: How were the datasets annotated?

Ex Output:

1. Each annotator must assign an integer score between 0 and 6 (inclusive) indicating how semantically similar the two words in a given pair are. A score of 6 indicates very high similarity (i.e., perfect synonymy), while zero indicates no similarity. 2. Each annotator must score the entire set of 1,888 pairs in the dataset.  able to use external sources (e.g. dictionaries, thesauri, WordNet) if required not able to communicate with each other during the annotation process