We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

[EX Q]: Sent1: In every state that retains the death penalty, jurors have the option of sentencing convicted capital murderers to life in prison without the possibility of parole.
 Sent2: Acutally, long ago, the executioner was a convict also sentenced to death.
[EX A]: Not similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: Therefore, people will think twice before they choose to commit a crime and also, the death penalty has been proven to deter the crime rate.
 Sent2: The thing is, without the death penalty there is absolutely no deterrent from committing heinous crimes.
[EX A]: Similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: >>>If we are sure they raped & killed those innocent children then we should let them die.
 Sent2: If a person wasn't convicted then they surely wouldn't be murdered by the state.
[EX A]:
Not similar