In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence can be inferred from the statement. Incorrect choices change the meaning in important ways or have details that are not mentioned in the statement. Indicate your answer as 1,2, or 3 corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.

Example Input: Statement: The pope was critical, especially in Poland. Choices:  1. The pope was not critical in Poland. 2. The pope might be critical in Poland. 3. The pope was important.
Example Output: 3

Example Input: Statement: Another refreshing feature of Goodman's storytelling is that, unlike other members of fundamentalist sects one might find in novels, her characters don't chafe at their restrictions, or not too much. Choices:  1. Goodman's characters failing to question their restrictions is frustrating to read. 2. The fact that Goodman's characters in fundamental sects don't generally feel too restricted by the rules of their sects is a unique aspect of Goodman's storytelling. 3. The common novel story line that has members of fundamentalist sects yearning for freedom has become overused and stale.
Example Output: 2

Example Input: Statement: His ideas may be terrible--some of them certainly are terrible--but at least they are new. Choices:  1. The man's ideas are terrible. 2. Most of the ideas are new. 3. All of the ideas are pure genius.
Example Output:
1