The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the no-need strategy, otherwise output No. no-need is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used when a participant points out that they do not need an item based on personal context such as suggesting that they have ample water to spare. no-need can directly benefit the opponent since it implies that the item is up for grabs.

Example Input: Context: 'Hi, I would like to get 3 firewood, 2 waters and 1 food pack.' 'Hello, I am in need of more water than just one,could you possibly allow me to have two and the other items are fine'
Utterance: 'I have a bunch of kids and need extra water. I can give you 2 food packs instead.'
Example Output: No

Example Input: Context: 'Hello fellow camper! I am interested to know your preference in items?'
Utterance: 'Hello! Yes I'm excited for the trip. 🙂 My most important is food. How about you?'
Example Output: No

Example Input: Context: 'i would prefer water instead of food if possible, but i am sure we can work it out.' 'water is really important for me, how about i get two waters and three firewoods and you get three foods and one water?' 'i can work with 1 water 3 food and 1 firewood'
Utterance: 'ok that works for me'
Example Output:
No