Categorize the comment on the basis of toxicity. If the comment is toxic (harmful, malicious, derogatory, threat, insult, identity attck, etc.) output Yes, otherwise output No.
--------
Question: i'm guessing that dogs being a passionate issue and tender spot for many,  this jerk may serve hard days as he may not be well liked.  there are no built in, preventative protections in jails for aggravated animal abusers as are for sexual offender creeps.  he'll be in the general population.  he better hope that bubba's only beloved and true friend wasn't his dog and that the thought of someone beating a dog doesn't make bubba crazy....***40 days for ralston  - what a shame - what a hole in our laws.  animals deserve certain  rights like dignity, humane treatment.....

Answer: Yes


Question: I've never understood how a person pledges blind support to a political party, because in reality they don't care about you in any form what so ever.

I rarely find myself agreeing with the Republican Party on any issue, same thing with the Democrat Party. Look at Juneau, every single elected representative deserves to be thrown out. But it will never happen because voters, no matter how much they complain, don't want to give up a single thing.

Look at the outcry over freezing state employees pay, you would think that some are going to be forced into poverty by the reactions. Same with ending corporate welfare to oil companies, or the state subsidizing GCI's profits. People act like by ending, or at least scaling back the amount, is going to make the state fail.

We are going to be in a world of hurt because of  people  who cling to their own self interests.

Answer: No


Question: Good for Eronius Johnson and Jaquiss for the DHS story. 
More like these all over the face of State Government. 
Just awful abuses of power and failure to do the morally intact reporting needed to stop the nonsense.

Answer:
Yes