We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

[Q]: As I say this case does not fit the bill completely, but I'm sure similar cases must arise and they should be an exception.
[A]: Invalid


[Q]: Well, I'd rather my money go towards a bullet for a child-rapist than his food, water, and room for the rest of his life.
[A]: Valid


[Q]: However, since the death penalty was reinstated in 1973 122 inmates have been exonerated from death row, but never has anyone come even close to proving that an innocent man was killed.
[A]:
Valid