In this task, you are given books product reviews in English language. The goal is to classify the review as "POS" if the overall sentiment of the review is positive or as "NEG" if the overall sentiment of the review is negative.

[EX Q]: Another fine book by the master . Poirot is given a case by his old pal Spence which takes him to a small village, where the fussy detective must unravel clues behind a crime in which the main  suspect has already been arrested and sentenced... Hercule's indignities at the run down boarding house he's staying at make up the bulk of the story's humor, but the mystery is great fun, too and I doubt anyone can guess the killer, unless you're paying amazingly close attention. The characters here are some of Agatha's most entertaining, and Mrs Oliver, with her uncanny intuition,  always makes a nice flighty side kick..
[EX A]: POS

[EX Q]: A review on the author . Although the book is great, it speaks for itself and I'm not here to review it.  I emailed the author, or someone who works with her, at the email address I got from Jan's website.  First of all, a little background.  I have a two-year-old border collie/lab who I've had since he was seven weeks.  I adore him.  I have been working from home with the occasional temp job up until two months ago.  I now work 5 days a week outside the house.  I wrote to this person asking advice on certain things relating to walking the dog, and mentioned the hours my dog is being left alone while I'm at work.  My response was that I am &quot;selfish&quot; and unfit to have a dog.  This coming from someone who was once so clueless about raising dogs that she put one of her own to sleep.  I have been looking into getting a dogwalker for my pooch, which as a person concerned for dogs, she could have suggested.    But her only suggestion was my poor dog, I shouldn't have him.  Whereas the book is a good read with good methods, I would suggest a second thought before asking her or her staff any questions personally.  She, or whoever that was, is rather selective in the dogs she'll help according to what she thinks of their owners.  It was a negative experience trying to get any kind of advice from them.  Rather than pointing out something wrong and offering suggestions to rectify it to someone who is obviously open to change, she chose instead to say, Sorry!  Not interested!  Not at all what I had in mind for someone in her position and with her passion
[EX A]: POS

[EX Q]: How To Write:  Annie's Way! . In this book Annie talks about what she does to write.  Each author has their own idiosyncratic and philosophical ways and means about how they write.  Annie shares with us some of both of her own.    She prefers a place without distraction.  A room with `no view' is preferable.  She does not even have too many basic heating or air conditioning requirements.  She will get by.  She finds a room over a garage or a pine shed without out any windows just perfect.  No distractions.    Philosophically she talks about the value of the reader knowing the lengths to which the author goes to create what they do.  She questions the relevance of that information.  And throughout, she discusses the position the author has; the removed and yet constrained perspective that the writer possesses in creating the work they are writing.    Finally, she talks about the author having the power to discuss extremes.  Conceptually, the idea of "Absolutes" being the focus of all non-fiction writing is mentioned.  The author's ability to set the tone, the mood and the results are discussed, but with the caveat that the story sometimes leads the author, and not the other way around.
[EX A]:
POS