In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.
--------
Question: Comment: Durango?!? I'm ambivalent about Amazon picking Denver but please don't destroy the smaller towns in the state. Durango would become unrecognizable if they were sucked into the Amazon orbit.

Answer: Non-sexual-explicit


Question: Comment: So women, a protected class, are less worthy of a college education preference than those who are non-white.  

I wonder how the gays, lesbians, transgendered and other 'protected' classes will fit into the paradigm which says racial preferences are the most important. 

Will there be a sliding scale?

Answer: Non-sexual-explicit


Question: Comment: baloney. 
What he is doing is throwing away GOOD MONEY. He is WASTING IT. 
The man has been a total screw-up and has accomplished NOTHING so far. 
He could easily solve the illegal issue (or trade with china), but is electing NOT TO. 
All that idiot needs to do is put a bill to phase-in e-verify over 2 years and THEN push for another bill that deals with immigration over all (green cards,  H1B, H2B, etc), along with deciding WHO to give what amnesty to. And believe me, that if trump does the phase-in correctly, it will put pressure on the dems to compromise QUICKLY. The Same is true of the GOP. 
And he RIGHTLY deserves blame because he is simply doing NOTHING but BSing all of you.

Answer:
Non-sexual-explicit