Given a sentence and an entity, the task is to select the authors sentiment towards the enity. Sentiments can be Positive, Neutral and Negative. Select Positive if the sentence expresses a positive view towards the given entity or praises its quality or skills. Select Neutral if the sentence expresses no clear view towards the entity or has equal amounts of positive and negative statements or expressing some fact/quote by someone else. Select Negative if the sentence expresses a negative view towards like harsh remarks, criticizing entities action/decision etc. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

Q: What is the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Sauvignon Watkins ? " He  never ceased to make me laugh about something every single day "  his  mother  Shawn Adams  49  said. "I just loved to listen to  his  stupid anecdotes or whatever to make me laugh."

A: Positive
****
Q: What is the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Sanchez ?  Instead of training police to grant people they recognize as disabled specific rights  victims like Leibel and Sanchez  demonstrate the need for police to operate with a baseline of presumption of compliance. When significant threats emerge  as does tragically happen  officers will need to respond. But when  Sanchez  walked forward  surely the officers could have stepped back. When the autistic boy was shaking his string  the officer could have just decided not to cuff a child  even if he didnât recognize the word âstimming.â There are so many ways to improve the situation without asking for specialized training.

A: Negative
****
Q: What is the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Hillary Clinton ?  Hillary Clinton  has been getting away with corruption for so long  she  doesn't see  herself  as subject to the law at all. There was  her  illegal private server   her  destruction of government emails and tech machinery 'with hammers ' amounting to obstruction of justice  there was  her  collusion with Fusion GPS which took phony "opposition research" from the Russians for use in an investigation and leakfest against Donald Trump and this doesn't even cover the half of it. During  her  tenure as Secretary of State  there were classified documents mishandled (left on the dashboard of cars on overseas trips)  the Benghazi failure to protect American personnel overseas  the Benghazi talking points coverup  a missing $2 billion in financial mismanagement and more. Scroll further back and the corruption continues in the same pattern: Whitewater  the cattle futures cleanup  the missing billing records and "I don't recall." lt likely goes even further back than that with the NGOs and the Nixon investigation. Any wonder the late William Safire called her 'a congenital liar' and the number one reason voters rejected her according to a Soros group  was the public perception of her as untrustworthy?

A:
Negative
****