We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

[Q]: Sent1: The question of whether death sentence should be allowed to continue or not, is therefore dependent upon the society and in general a society that has evolved as a "civilized" society would not need such punishments.
 Sent2: America, has no doubt evolved as a civilized society, but it has terrible enemies who would work from within its society and this may be a reason for wanting to continue death penalty.
[A]: Not similar


[Q]: Sent1: therefore the death penalty should not be used, simply because it kills innocent people.
 Sent2: There are also people who will tell you that the death penalty actually kills innocent people.
[A]: Similar


[Q]: Sent1: What is the REASON behind "an eye for an eye" justice?
 Sent2: An eye for an eye won't make the whole world blind if the person never took the eye in the first place.
[A]:
Similar