TASK DEFINITION: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.
PROBLEM: Comment: Just to note that President Trump supporters were asked to not wear hats or signs but the President Trump haters seem to be wearing their hate President Trump pussy hats including a leader in the demonstration. Non-political my butt.

SOLUTION: Sexual-explicit

PROBLEM: Comment: During the day I believe he went to prospective houses where he hoped to harm individuals, knocking on doors during the day where he asked for work.  He is an admitted liar.  He is manipulative producing his penciled writing.  It may be the cover story.  He is definitely a thug perhaps for political purposes.  He may not be who he presents himself at all.  He may just be an operative of some type perhaps a paid assassin.  How would you like him showing up at your door with your family there - while you are at work.  He may have.  Not buying his penciled story.  He is an admitted liar among other qualities.  He no doubt has his admirers and cohorts in various interests.  The one's he and his associates have not "mentioned".  Gullible reporting?  What's his military record?  I don't believe his story.  He is a bad character for sure.

SOLUTION: Non-sexual-explicit

PROBLEM: Comment: Scott Pelly was 100% correct, the Republithug party has brought this down on themselves, they have created an atmosphere of hate and lies, now it is coming back to bite them in the ass.

SOLUTION:
Sexual-explicit