In this task, you're given a statement, and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence clearly disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3' corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.

[Q]: Statement: Electronic signatures meeting the aforementioned criteria, however, can provide the necessary data integrity for highly automated systems because the signature seals the data once it is applied. Choices:  1. Electronic signatures can be accepted for banking documents. 2. Electronic signatures are never safe enough. 3. Electronic signatures are often safe enough.
[A]: 2


[Q]: Statement: uh one of them has made big banners to put on the oh we have one of those isn't that awful shelter a covered shelter and they've had big banners to display across the front of that Choices:  1. The banners will be recycled when they're done. 2. Nobody's provided any banners. 3. They made some big banners.
[A]: 2


[Q]: Statement: Reno has apparently construed this ambiguous provision in the only way one sensibly can. Choices:  1. Reno's traffic provisions were ambiguous.  2. Reno's provisions were very exact. 3. Reno construed an ambiguous provision in the most sensible way possible.
[A]:
2