In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: insult and non-insult. Insult is any lanugage or act that is disrespectful or scornfully abusive.

Q: Comment: If it was against the law then why did they "let him off" with a warning about being inappropriate and not wrong ? I don't advocate taking these kinds of pictures and don't do it myself, but nobody here, including Motley Fool has made a case that the guy broke the law. And in my, psychologically damaged, mind he may have acted rudely and cruely, but did not break the law. And, again, if the woman is so bothered by people looking at or taking pictures of he bare flesh then she can cover it up. AND she didn't seem to have an issue with it until she was denied a promotion, unless I am reading the story incorrectly.

A: Non-insult
****
Q: Comment: Your an idiot...

A: Insult
****
Q: Comment: I'm not sure what you mean by "original plan".  

The original plan dates back to the 70s, then Dick Lamm killed it.  There was an attempted revival in 1989 when Jeffco, Boulder, and Adams County voters shot down a car registration fee to fund it.  

The current incarnation of the shortened highway[to nowhere] goes back to 2001. Sixteen years.

A:
Non-insult
****