We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Example Input: Sent1: I support the death penalty, but feel there needs to be a better system of checks and balances to ensure each individual gets a fair trial using all evidentiary methods available.
 Sent2: There shouldn't be a death penalty it isn't fair.
Example Output: Not similar

Example Input: Sent1: My argument makes it clear that innocent people need not be sentenced to death in order for the death penalty to be unjust.
 Sent2: while it is a fact that innocent people have been placed and convicted to death row condemned to die, there are however people who are guilty and should die.
Example Output: Not similar

Example Input: Sent1: It seems that there is still a majority in this country who is for the death penalty.
 Sent2: People generally think that the death penalty is worse than life without parole (certainly most criminals seem to think so).
Example Output:
Not similar