Given a document, an entity and its sentiment towards the entity, verify if it is the correct sentiment towards the entity. Answer should be yes or no. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

Input: Consider Input: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Bart Fisher is Positive . The top recipient has been Fisher Ranch LLC  the family company of Bart Fisher  a board member and the valleyâs second-largest landowner after Metropolitan. The records show his company has received $27.6 million in annual payments since 2005 for land left fallow.
 Fisher  and other board members say theyâve had no conflicts of interest in these decisions  and their attorney has backed them up. They say the fact that theyâve benefited from the program is the nature of their agencyâs structure as a landowner-voting district. All of the board members are landowners  and theyâre elected by landowners under a voting system in which the largest property owners can cast the largest numbers of votes.
 Fisher  was a leading proponent of the agreement in the early 2000s.  He  said  he  supported it because  he  strongly believed it was in the best long-term interests of landowners and the community.
âThe financial interests of the board were the same as the financial interests of our electorate â  Fisher  said.  He  recalled that Palo Verdeâs attorney advised the board ahead of the vote that they were fine to proceed with the decision.
âThereâs no conflict at PVID at all  because of how we are constituted â  Fisher  said. âOur electorate is whom we serve  and our electorate are landowners.â
Standing beside hay bales on his farm  Palo Verde Irrigation District board member Bart Fisher talks about the agency's lawsuit against the Metropolitan Water District. (Photo: Jay Calderon/The Desert Sun)
When they negotiated the terms of the deal   Fisher  said  the overarching purpose was helping California meet its water needs âwithout diminishing agriculture or our community in the process.â
âI have a vested interest and so do all the landowners in Palo Verde  especially those who participate in the program â  Fisher  said.
Participating farmers received an initial signup bonus of $3 170 per acre. In  Fisher âs case  the records show  his family entities received $6.3 million in initial signup payments.
Having those regular payments can function as a âsafety netâ for farming businesses during hard times and can provide a guarantee to help in getting credit from banks   Fisher  said. That doesnât mean it always pays more than farming  though. Looking back at some years   Fisher  said  farmers would have earned more selling crops than having unplanted fields.
 Fisher  is a third-generation farmer whose family started farming in the Palo Verde Valley in 1917.  He  said the fact that Fisher Ranch has received more from Metropolitan than any other business simply reflects the fact that  his  family has been farming for a century and has gradually expanded its landholdings.
 Fisher  farms more than 11 000 acres  growing hay  wheat  broccoli  cantaloupes and honeydew melons.
 He  said while  his  business receives large sums based on that acreage  it takes a lot of money to run the operation.  Fisher  pointed out that  he  and other growers make huge investments in tractors â which can cost roughly $300 000 each â as well as other equipment. They take out big loans and have large payrolls.
âJust to be in agriculture requires access to vast amounts of capital â  Fisher  said. âNobodyâs getting rich on this program.â
Palo Verde Irrigation District officials â from left  Board Member Jack Seiler   General Manager Ned Hyduke and President Bart Fisher â  talk about why  they  decided to sue Metropolitan Water District. (Photo: Jay Calderon/The Desert Sun)
While considering whether to sue   Fisher  said Palo Verdeâs board members discussed the fact that under the agreement  Metropolitan has the ability to cancel the entire program.

Output: yes


Input: Consider Input: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Sensei Johnny is Positive . March 2 (UPI) — The latest trailer for YouTube Red’s upcoming Cobra Kai series shows William Zabka’s  Johnny  as a ruthless sensei.
“I’m going to teach you the style of karate that was taught to me. Fear does not exist in this dojo  does it?”  Sensei Johnny  asks a student  calling back to the Cobra Kai mantra  he  obeyed as a competitive teen in the 1984 film The Karate Kid.
“No  sensei!”  his  follower barks back.
“Pain does not exist in this dojo  does it?”  Johnny  challenges another group of students.
“ Johnny Lawrence  is still fighting  his  old nemesis Daniel LaRusso. Rivalries never die  even 30 years later ” said a message accompanying the 30-second preview  which does not show Ralph Macchio reprising his role of the balance-seeking good guy Daniel.

Output: yes


Input: Consider Input: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Ryan Zinke is Positive . Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke on Tuesday called on President Trump to shrink a total of four national monuments and change the way six other land and marine sites are managed  a sweeping overhaul of how protected areas are maintained in the United States.
 Zinke âs final report comes a day after Trump signed proclamations in Utah that downsized two massive national monuments there â Bears Ears by 85 percent and Grand Staircase-Escalante by 46 percent. The president had directed  Zinke  in April to review 27 national monuments established since 1996 under the Antiquities Act  which gives the president broad authority to safeguard federal lands and waters under threat.
In addition to the Utah sites   Zinke  supports cutting Nevadaâs Gold Butte and Oregonâs Cascade-Siskiyou  though the exact reductions are still being determined.  He  also would revise the proclamations for those and the others to clarify that activities such as grazing  motorized vehicle use and commercial fishing should be allowed.
âThe Antiquities Act over time has done great things for our country  and it has protected some of our greatest treasures â  he  said in a call with reporters. But its power had been âabused â  he  said  with monument designations extending far beyond the objects they were designed to protect.
 Zinke  criticized the federal governmentâs past action halting motorized vehicle traffic in Cascade-Siskiyou until a transportation plan could be finalized  arguing that  it  interfered with local cross-country ski operatorsâ ability to maintain trails.
âIt should have been the other way around â  he  said.
For several sites   Zinke  recommended amending monumentsâ proclamation language to ensure that activities such as grazing  hunting and fishing can continue. While these practices often go on even after a presidential designation   Zinke  said  he  wants to make that legality clear because ranchers have felt marginalized and fear they will face future restrictions.
In the case of New Mexicoâs national monuments   Zinke  said   he  listened to the stateâs two Democratic senators and others in deciding not to modify their boundaries. Still   he  wanted âto make sure that the proclamation protects the long-standing grazing [in parts] of those monumentsâ and that management of Organ Mountain-Desert Peaks does not interfere with U.S. Customs and Border Control operations in the area.
Sen. Martin Heinrich wasnât buying the explanation. He blasted  Zinke  in a statement  saying the âreport is based on hearsay and erroneous dataâ and that the secretary and Trump âhave turned a deaf ear to the overwhelming consensus to protect New Mexicoâs conservation legacy.â
More litigation could be coming. Oregon Attorney General Ellen Rosenblum warned  Zinke  in a letter in July the state was âready to take appropriate legal actionâ if Trump rescinds or reduces the size of Cascade-Siskiyou.
Interior received more than 2.5 million comments on the review  and they âoverwhelminglyâ said all of the monuments should remain unchanged   Zinke  wrote in  his  report. But  he  attributed the extreme tilt to âa well-orchestrated national campaign organized by multiple groups.â
âI donât yield to public pressure â  Zinke  said Tuesday. âSound public policy is not based on threats of lawsuit  itâs doing whatâs right.â
The final document is almost identical to the draft  Zinke  submitted to the White House this summer  and much of the language is vague. For example  it appears open the door to commercial fishing in three marine monuments where this practice is either being phased out or is already banned. Yet the report calls for amending the sitesâ proclamations to allow regional councils âto make fishery-management decisions as authorized by the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act.â
 Zinke  also finalized  his  recommendations to create three new national monuments: at Kentuckyâs Camp Nelson  a Civil War training site for African American soldiers; at Medgar Eversâ home in Jackson  Miss.; and at the Badger-Two Medicine area in  his  home state of Montana.
The secretary said he was âfairly confidentâ Trump would accept all of his recommendations  and he intends to brief him âmultiple timesâ in coming weeks to get his sign-off.  Zinke  also rejected the idea that any of these alterations of existing monuments would amount to relinquishing control of federal land  describing such criticism as ânefarious  false and a lie.â
House Natural Resources Committee Chairman Rep. Rob Bishop (R-Utah) commended  Zinke  on Tuesday for âactually listening to the people on the local levelâ and Trump for showing â some real courage against well-funded litigation machines.â


Output: yes