In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Comment: Denver is a shit hole city it stinks it smells and you can thank the FUCKING scum shit holes from California.the FUCKING scum libtards they Fuck up everything they touch !!! Can't drive thru Denver with out smelling that crap it stinks and a skunk smells better and that stupid FUCKING  dickenlooper who thinks he is smart hebone dumb POS the helped Fuck IP Colorado just like iscumbo ducked up America
Obscene

Comment: Those of you who write about enviro-hypocrisy and such, please help me out. Just so I know ... 

1. People file a lawsuit because they worry about ozone layers, climate change, species going extinct, polar ice melting, glaciers disappearing and all that. They didn't blow something up or burn something down, they went straight to the channels our society provides for, all orderly and appropriate. What should they do? Just shut up? Because we know better? 

2. Is there any concern for the environment that isn't what you call enviro-hypocrisy? Can a person who lives like the rest of us (drives a car, dresses in clothes, lives in a house, consumes electricity, and exists as a normal person) still want public policies that might slow down the trend without being a hypocrite? Or are only people who run around dressed in leaves and sleeping on the ground entitled to care about these things?
Non-obscene

Comment: colBERT is an ass, kimmel is an ass, and I can't even think of the name of the other ass, but it's true that I don't watch asses EVER!

Obscene