In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

[Q]: Comment: Upon what evidence do you base your opinion that her response was "phony?"  Or that it was "outrage?"  The outrage that YOU are expressing shows an appalling lack of sensitivity on your part.  Why defend rudeness?
[A]: Non-identity-attack


[Q]: Comment: Might as well breakout the ass trays and allow smoking inside. Lol. I eat peanuts or some type of treenut everyday in the comforts of my own home. I've always considered others in public settings and made sure I didn't bring traces to these areas. McD's has lost my respect and business on this decision.  Not sure why I support those who are affected by allergies but I'm glad I'm not ignorant to their struggles.
[A]: Non-identity-attack


[Q]: Comment: How about if I read in the Bible that homosexuals should be stoned to death? I guess that means, according to you, that all Christians should be banned from U.S. soil. Awesome! I am definitely on board with that.
[A]:
Identity-attack