TASK DEFINITION: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.
PROBLEM: Comment: I was so excited to eat at Mi Mero Mole until I found out that the owner, Nick Zukin, was racist and so dismissive of Black Lives Matter.

I'm grateful that this very real issue with Saffron has brought much more about Portland businesses into the light and caused folks to dig deeper into who they support.

Smart business owners should do the right thing and use this opportunity to sympathize with the community (who is rightfully outraged) with the result of likely earning that community's support and winning  them over to their business (much like Ristretto Roasters did) rather than PUBLICLY expressing support and shooting themselves in the proverbial foot. It doesn't look like Nick Zukin is that kind of business owner. I suppose some people just like to commit business-suicide.

It's amazing how arrogant business owners like Sally and Nick are to think that Portland has enough racists or racist-sympathizers to keep their restaurants afloat.

SOLUTION: Non-sexual-explicit

PROBLEM: Comment: Our government has been run like a business for so long! Let the real business man run it!  Hilary has proven herself a coward if my husband ever cheated on me the way Bill did I'd wear his balls as a necklace.

SOLUTION: Sexual-explicit

PROBLEM: Comment: "Masturbation is not evil per se, contraceptives are a reasonable tool for family planning, premarital sexual experience is common .... there really are people who by their nature are sexually attracted to people of the same sex."

Theft is common; so is murder. Demonstrate the reasoning behind your assertions. Because a human behaviour is common does not make it moral. Desire is not the yardstick of moral conduct.

SOLUTION:
Sexual-explicit