In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

Ex Input:
Comment: Yeah you're right. Less government to gut regulations dealing with accountability for polluting, or for industrial oversight, less taxes for our politicians corporate sponsors, or to investigate nefarious activities of the administration and Congress itself. 
More government to dictate to minorities, dictate to women what to do with their bodies, more government to invade other countries so Congress's corporate sponsors can go in for free to create terrorism by stealing others resources and lands.
We are owned by leeches and parasites whose bottom line is how much more can they squeeze out of us

Ex Output:
Non-identity-attack


Ex Input:
Comment: You gotta hit the Americans where it hurts.

Ex Output:
Identity-attack


Ex Input:
Comment: If we thought we had a shortage of priests before this, watch what happens now. Frankly, I always thought the rule was not heterosexual vs. homosexual, the rule was that one doesn't act on either alternative. It's about celibacy, not orientation - isn't it?

Does this rule apply to gay nuns also?

Ex Output:

Identity-attack