The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the no-need strategy, otherwise output No. no-need is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used when a participant points out that they do not need an item based on personal context such as suggesting that they have ample water to spare. no-need can directly benefit the opponent since it implies that the item is up for grabs.

Context: 'Hi! How is your camping trip going?' 'It's going good we could use some more supplies such as food and firewood, though.'
Utterance: 'Same here haha. Is water your lowest priority item too?'
No

Context: 'Sorry, that can't work for me. Is there a reason you need all the firewood and food?' 'I have health issues, and I need to keep warm at night.  And I don't know how much fish I can catch.' 'Okay, that makes sense. But I also need to keep warm.'
Utterance: 'I think I can get by with 2 firewood, and give you 1.'
No

Context: 'sounds reasonable' 'Great! glad we could come to an agreement. May I ask why you are camping while pregnant?' 'its fun, pregnancy cravings🙂'
Utterance: 'ahh I see. respect!'

No