The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.

Input: Consider Input: Context: 'Kindly understand our need as we are struggling with hunger now.' 'At the same from my side. We need foods because my child is hunger'
Utterance: 'We with our kids undergone fasting in the recent days, so we are hungry to the peak'

Output: Yes


Input: Consider Input: Context: 'awesome! I love the rockies. So let's try and divy up our extra supplies then. Personally, I feel that I'd need the most extra food, as I'm a rather large guy and plan to go hiking a lot during this time. Firewood would be nice, so I could have a big bonfire. What are your prefernces? ' 'i need food the most since there will be my kids and I. I can give up my firewood for food' 'Okay, so how about I get 1 food, and 3 firewood and 1 water, and you get 2 food, 0 firewood, and 2 water'
Utterance: 'sounds great'

Output: No


Input: Consider Input: Context: 'Food doesn't prevent cold. Thank you for giving me all the food but I need 1 wood to cook the additional food. You still end up with more items in the  end  ' 'Okay I accept the deal.' '🙂awesome thank you'
Utterance: 'Sorry, I thought that I can manage with two woods, but the temperature is very loo and many people need to save their life.  Please change the deal and provide us 3 wood.'


Output: Yes