We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Q: Sent1: If today we were to ban guns all the law abiding citizens would give up their firearms and protection.
 Sent2: Once we disarm law abiding citizens, the only armed civilians around will be criminals who would never willingly give up their weapons.

A: Not similar
****
Q: Sent1: Countries that ban guns or implement stricter laws concerning firearms have lower crime rates.
 Sent2: All that I point out is that Canada, which has very strict gun control laws, also has a much lower murder rate than does the USA.

A: Similar
****
Q: Sent1: I see you always use gun crime rates as an argument, are you totally uninterested in other types of violent crimes, what happens when all guns are banned and we only have knife crimes?
 Sent2: Using a shotgun or an AK-47 will get the job done, so I don't see the need to ban assault weapons.

A:
Not similar
****