We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

[Q]: But they do have a law forcing post-conviction DNA testing.
[A]: Valid


[Q]: Currently, the death penalty is lawful in the US, therefore it cannot be defined as murder.
[A]: Valid


[Q]: If anything, this kind of "argument" is an argument for abolishing the death penalty, since it isn't used uniformly across the entire country.
[A]:
Valid