Given a document, generate a short title of the document. The title should convey the main idea/event/topic about which the document is being written. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

Input: Consider Input: Former President Bill Clinton  is reportedly facing a new round of charges of sexual assault from four women  who claim the incidents occurred after  Clinton  left the White House in 2001.
Author and journalist Ed Klein reports in the Daily Mail that attorneys have notified  Clinton  that they are preparing to file four separate lawsuits against  him . Klein says a member of  Clinton ’s legal team has confirmed the existence of the allegations to  him .
 Clinton ’s history of sexual misconduct both before and during  his  presidency returned to the spotlight in 2016 and again in 2017 during  his  wife Hillary’s failed presidential bid and more recently amid new allegations of sexual misconduct against a plethora of politicians  journalists  and Hollywood celebrities.
Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY) said last week that  Clinton  should have resigned the presidency in the wake of his affair with White House intern Monica Lewinsky. It forms part of a broader re-evaluation of  Clinton ’s conduct by Democrats and left-wing media pundits.
Klein  who has written a number of sensationalist books including All Out War: The Plot to Destroy Trump  reports that the women were employed in “low-level positions” at an organization owned by playboy billionaire Ron Burkle.  Clinton  was hired by Burkle and flew around the world on Burkle’s private jet — which Klein says was known as “Air Fuck One.”
Klein says there is no evidence that Burkle knew anything about the alleged assaults by  Clinton . He also reports that  Hillary Clinton  is “furious” with Bill for getting stuck in another scandal and offered to hire private detectives to dig up dirt on the women — but  Clinton ’s attorneys said no.

Output: Report: Bill Clinton Facing Fresh Accusations of Sexual Assault


Input: Consider Input: Mann said he was gratified by the findings  the second report from Penn State to clear him. An earlier report had exonerated him of related charges that he suppressed or falsified data  destroyed e-mail and misused confidential information.
 The new report did criticize him on a minor point  saying that he had occasionally forwarded to colleagues copies of unpublished manuscripts without the explicit permission of their authors.
 The allegations arose after private e-mail messages between Mann and other scientists were purloined from a computer at the University of East Anglia  in Britain  and posted on the Internet. In one  a British researcher called a data-adjustment procedure Mann used a "trick."
 The e-mail messages led climate-change skeptics to accuse mainstream researchers  including Mann  of deliberately manipulating the findings of climate science in order to strengthen their case that human activity is causing the earth to warm up.
 "I'm aware  and many researchers now are keenly aware  of the depths to which the climate-change disinformation movement is willing to sink  to the point where they're willing to criminally break into a university server and steal people's personal e-mail messages " Mann said in an interview.
 "It's no surprise that it's a whitewash of Mann's misconduct  because it was designed to be a whitewash " said Myron Ebell  director of energy and global warming policy at the Competitive Enterprise Institute  a Washington advocacy group. He accused the panel of failing to interview important witnesses.
 The panel did not try to vet the accuracy of the science published by Mann  including a famous finding that the temperature of the earth had jumped recently  compared with past climate inferred from indicators like tree rings. Instead  it examined his methodology -- his analytical techniques  his willingness to share data with those skeptical of his findings and the like. The panel unanimously found his approach "well within the range of accepted practices."
 Mann remains under investigation by the attorney general of Virginia for research he did at the University of Virginia.

Output: PENN STATE PANEL CLEARS SCIENTIST OVER CLIMATEGATE


Input: Consider Input: "You didn't see droves of people abandoning their religion  spouses  or jobs " said Michael Varnum  an assistant professor of psychology at Arizona State University  in an interview.
But NASA's search for extraterrestrial life continues â specifically with its Mars' rovers and planned future missions.  Varnum  sought to understand how humanity might react to indisputable evidence of the discovery of alien life. This research  published in Frontiers in Psychology and presented at the American Association for the Advancement of Science's annual meeting last week  reveals that we would likely respond positively to such a discovery.
"If we discover evidence of extra-terrestrial life  we'll be fine with it â we'll be happy " said  Varnum .
This study  however  focused on the discovery of microbial life â not intelligent lifeforms. Still   Varnum  believes the reactions to more advanced  perhaps communicative life would probably be positive  too.


Output: The discovery of alien life may be viewed as exciting and positive