In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence can be inferred from the statement. Incorrect choices change the meaning in important ways or have details that are not mentioned in the statement. Indicate your answer as 1,2, or 3 corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.

Input: Consider Input: Statement: And it is impossible to see how this difference from Rust has any bearing upon the First Amendment question, which, to repeat, is whether the funding scheme is 'manipulated' to have a 'coercive effect' on those who do not hold the subsidized position. Choices:  1. It is not possible to see how this difference from Rust has any bearing on the First Amendment question. 2. The difference from Rust on the First Amendment question is very noticeable. 3. The question that was asked it really rather very subjective.

Output: 1


Input: Consider Input: Statement: namely uh replacing putting the catalytic converter back on the car Choices:  1. A part of the process was replacing the catalytic converter.  2. I have a lot of experience with repairing cars. 3. The catalytic converter has never broken.

Output: 1


Input: Consider Input: Statement: I feel these are more social problems than legal cases, she said. Choices:  1. I think these welfare babies are more social problems than legal cases. 2. She said she felt these are more social problems than legal cases. 3. I think these are legal cases, he said.


Output: 2