In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

[Q]: Comment: And, finally:
.
"We'd be in uncharted territory, that is unarguable."
.
What nonsense.
.
The vast majority of democracies world-wide use PR.  Are you really suggesting Canadians are too dumb to figure it out?
.
Or are you merely suggesting that it only works in countries where the populations once worshipped Odin, Thor, and Freya?
.
Bring on Bugs Bunny, Elmer Fudd, and the Wagnerian opera ...
[A]: Non-obscene


[Q]: Comment: Damn, I thought it was bad when they stopped giving me the whole can of soda.  I'll keep my mouth shut from now on.
[A]: Obscene


[Q]: Comment: Does anyone actually have statistics on violence perpetrated upon blacks by 
cops ? And if we substantiate it , what are the reasons for it ? Is it really (solely) racism ? Or is it fear of violent black areas cops are forced to patrol ? Why can we not have dialogue about this without censorship ? Are we so afraid we might upset someone that we are not able to discuss it as adults ?
[A]:
Non-obscene