Given the Question and Answer pair, detect whether the answer is acceptable or not. Denote acceptable answer as "yes", otherwise denote as "no". An acceptable answer is consistent with the context in question, detailed, long, and uses general knowledge of English. Answers that are not definite and suggest a variety of options are not acceptable answers.

Example Input: Question: What is the mark of punctuation called that sometimes separates sections of a chapter with a glyph placed in the middle between the margins? It's hard to explain, but here's a picture. Does this have a name? (Yes, I know this is a asterisk. Sometimes it's three of them, sometimes it's a stylized graphic. I'm looking for the general name of the...methodology/practice (?) of doing this.) 
Answer: Broader terms for glyphs used to separate text and do other non-text jobs are dingbat and ornament or printer's ornament. More info at the Wikipedia page for dingbat. According to that same page, the specific character you're asking about is Unicode character U+273D, described as Heavy teardrop spoked asterisk, or possibly U+273B, Teardrop spoked asterisk.
Example Output: no

Example Input: Question: Is there a proverb that fits the following situation: John and Anderson (while walking): John: [sees a $100 bill lying in the road, and shouts] Yahoo! $100! Anderson: [takes the money and puts it into his pocket] Reflection: John exclaimed when he saw the money in the road, but he didn't try to take it. Anderson was smarter, as, when he saw John exclaiming, he took the money and put it into his pocket. Consequently, John now repents his foolish excitement. My question is, is there a proverb for such situations? EDIT: When I asked my friend, he suggested the following saying: "Some feel the rain others just get wet." 
Answer: One very common, albiet obnoxious phrase would be: Finders, keepers; Losers, weepers While this generally relates to the idea that once you find something that appears to be unowned - it is now your property - and not necessarily the idea of missing out on something, because you were too slow to act on it. It's such a common phrase in childhood, that it can be applied obnoxiously to imply "now that I've picked it up, it's mine - you cannot complain about it". In this case, the one who picked it up first would consider themself the "Finder" and the one who lost out on it (the original owner, and the person who was too slow to pick it up) would be considered the "Loser". Again, it's not a perfect phrase for this situation, but it is such a common idiom that it does get applied frequently to these kind of situations.
Example Output: no

Example Input: Question: What's the difference between these two phrases? 
Answer: The difference is pretty subtle, but the "did you..." version implies more of an event, i.e. something that needs to be seen just once, perhaps because it's temporary. So, Have you seen [insert movie title]? but Did you see last night's [insert TV show name] episode? Edit: note that there's nothing wrong with "Have you seen last night's episode?", or with "Did you see the movie?", but there is a (slight) difference in meaning.
Example Output:
no