We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Ex Input:
They are carried out in a fit of rage, or fear (such as in the case of a thief shooting a police officer or citizen during a robbery).

Ex Output:
Invalid


Ex Input:
if you execute a pickpocket or give him life imprisonment, then you would have one less thief to worry about but I think we agree that that would be excessive).

Ex Output:
Valid


Ex Input:
The life sentence really needs to be for a life time not only 30 years or what ever it is, but the death penalty is no morally or ethically correct.

Ex Output:

Valid