In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

[EX Q]: Comment: For me, there's something powerfully wrong when the BC Liberal government goes ahead and  quietly sells-off publicly owned social housing properties/assets like Nicholson Tower, Sunset Towers, or others, without first holding open public consultations/hearings as part of the democratic process involved in the sale of these publicly owned assets first, and that would include the residents most affected by the damn sale and the neighbourhood where the public properties/assets are located - much like public hearings are held on a municipal property re-zoning application for example.  But alas, it seems like our beloved less-than-democratically-open BC Liberal government, deemed this wholly unnecessary.  Why!??
[EX A]: Non-identity-attack

[EX Q]: Comment: And you, Strada, have every right to make moronic comments, to violate logic, make unwarranted assumptions as though they has a basis in the real world and then to refuse to sign the initiative.
[EX A]: Non-identity-attack

[EX Q]: Comment: If he called her a “big, black woman,” that's going to weigh heavily against him.
[EX A]:
Identity-attack