In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence can be inferred from the statement. Incorrect choices change the meaning in important ways or have details that are not mentioned in the statement. Indicate your answer as 1,2, or 3 corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.

Ex Input:
Statement: He decided that Tuppence, in the throes of anxiety, had gone to the police, and that his disappearance having been made public the gang had not been slow to put two and two together. Choices:  1. The gang was after him for stealing their jewels and they thought that he was still missing.  2. He thought that Tuppence, being full of angst, went to law enforcement and that public knowledge of the fact that he was missing made public the group didn't put the two facts together.  3. Tuppence was content and lacked worry and didn't leave the house. 

Ex Output:
2


Ex Input:
Statement: A guillotine replaced the king's statue and was used to behead Louis XVI and more than 1,000 other victims. Choices:  1. Louis XVI was executed using an electric chair. 2. The guillotine was the method of execution during Louis XVI's time. 3. Louis XVI and many other people were executed using a guillotine.

Ex Output:
3


Ex Input:
Statement: right it curbs the appetite and helps with the calories and all that stuff Choices:  1. yeah, it makes you less hungry, which leads to consuming fewer calories 2. unfortunately, it makes you really hungry 3. correct, it reduces your appetite and helps you cut calories

Ex Output:

3