We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

[Q]: Sent1: now imagine if no criminals could get hold of a gun, you wouldn't need a protection, as no criminals have guns.
 Sent2: Only why would you need gun registration if guns were illegal?
[A]: Not similar


[Q]: Sent1: Bad Gun control are things that hinder a lawfull person from being able to purchase and use firearms.
 Sent2: People like Brady blame the gun and say because one man uses a gun to harm someone then no one can be trusted with guns.
[A]: Not similar


[Q]: Sent1: Or, to put it another way, more guns = more crime, and if we could stop the illegal gun running then we would have less guns = less crime.
 Sent2: It is legal to own weapons in this country, they are just tightly controlled, and as a result we have far less gun crime (particularly where it's not related to organised crime).
[A]:
Not similar