In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Comment: Gee.. don't know about that.. The article was quite sarcastic, but then suppose that is what comedy is all about..

Though, this topic was not about a CBC comedy series... this is a serious issue for both sides, but then that is another Canadian perspective.

Further, there seems, as well, to be much larger issues which are at play globally concerning this religion; it seems to have a number of jihadist terror organizations that are associated with it -- that right there could be the poisonous fly in the ointment ; clearer communication from all facets of the Muslim World needs to be spoken to that reality, including an explanatory resonance of reason concerning of this non-integration with 'Infidels and Jews'..

There are a number of issues that are 'fluffed-off' which is a darn good reason why 'martyrdom' is not what is needed here by Islam -- a good solid sit-down integrated respectful discussion with all the players is.. both Male & Female.. with or without the religious sartorial.
Obscene

Comment: I'd like to share a comment written in response to the article "Clarity beyond clericalism: Bishop Long at the Royal Commission" published in the Australian on-line journal "Eureka Street." The article elicited this response from one reader, who referred to Catholic schools:

"If there were a significant risk of abuse, then enrolments would have fallen off dramatically. They haven't... so I conclude this is a witch-hunt...and not a realistic assessment of any widespread problem."

To describe Australia's Royal Commission into Institutional Child Sexual Abuse as an unrealistic "witch-hunt" addressing a manufactured problem sounds bizarre to me.  However, this commentator is not alone; there are others.

Those of us who believe Church reform is sine qua non need to be talking to these folks.  Conversation can be a slow process, but if there is no meeting of minds, no willingness to listen, we're dead in the water.
Non-obscene

Comment: Was Jesus unaware of failed marriages when He overturned Moses on divorce and remarriage?  Are failed marriages unique to our day?

I think the problem with liberals is trying to be "more merciful" than Christ Himself.

Non-obscene