In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

Input: Consider Input: Sentence: I stuck a pin through a carrot. When I pulled the pin out, it left a hole.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the pin because They stabbed the carrot. Logically a hole would be left. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

Output: Correct


Input: Consider Input: Sentence: The older students were bullying the younger ones, so we punished them .
 Reason: The 'them' refers to the older students because the older students were punished because of bullying younger ones. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

Output: Correct


Input: Consider Input: Sentence: The lawyer asked the witness a question, but he was reluctant to answer it.
 Reason: The 'he' refers to the witness because The witness was reluctant to answer a question asked. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 


Output: Correct