TASK DEFINITION: In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence can be inferred from the statement. Incorrect choices change the meaning in important ways or have details that are not mentioned in the statement. Indicate your answer as 1,2, or 3 corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.
PROBLEM: Statement: I wasn't numb anymore. Choices:  1. I felt it. 2. I didn't feel anything. 3. I felt immense pain.

SOLUTION: 1

PROBLEM: Statement: But in the closing days of the campaign, it stands as an apt description of his faltering Republican opponents. Choices:  1. His faltering Republican opponents were trailing behind in the closing days of the campaign.  2. In the later days of the campaign the Republican opponents each had individual scandals arise which faltered their confidence, while the opponent had an op-ed about his work with grassroots community organizations.  3. His Republican opponents were doing quite well in the polls and received positive media attention which eclipsed his own campaign. 

SOLUTION: 1

PROBLEM: Statement: The second issue is addressed by assuming that the relationship between age and willingness-to-pay for fatal risk reductions can be approximated using an adjustment factor derived from Jones-Lee (1989). Choices:  1. We're assuming, for the second issue, that the relationship between age and willingness-to-pay for fatal risk reductions can be approximated. 2. The adjustment factor derived from Jones-Lee, used here for approximation, isn't very accurate. 3. Our theory doesn't allow us to approximate a number yet, so we need to leave the second issue as it is for now.

SOLUTION:
1