In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

Ex Input:
Sentence: The cat was lying by the mouse hole waiting for the mouse, but it was too impatient.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the cat because The mouse was aware of and avoiding the cat. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

Ex Output:
Wrong


Ex Input:
Sentence: Jackson was greatly influenced by Arnold, though he lived two centuries later.
 Reason: The 'he' refers to jackson because LIKELY TO REFER JACKSON ARNOID. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

Ex Output:
Wrong


Ex Input:
Sentence: In the middle of the outdoor concert, the rain started falling, but it continued until 10.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the concert because It means the concert kept going even while it was raining. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

Ex Output:

Correct