In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence can be inferred from the statement. Incorrect choices change the meaning in important ways or have details that are not mentioned in the statement. Indicate your answer as 1,2, or 3 corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.

Statement: Nor is Clinton's blend of realism and idealism necessarily corrupt. Choices:  1. Clinton's blend of realism and idealism is extremely corrupt. 2. The blend of realism and idealism portrayed by Clinton should be punished. 3. Clinton's blend of realism and idealism is fair.
3

Statement: The result is a Hindu temple on a grand scale which can be easily compared with its the many temples of Mahabalipuram , built some 50 years before in the southern region. Choices:  1. This Hindu temple is as large and grand as those built in the south, 50 years earlier. 2. The grandness of this Hindu temple sets it apart from the temples of Mahabalipuram. 3. This Hindu temple has similarities to the temples of Mahabalipuram.
3

Statement: yeah yeah where what part of Texas oh okay now i i i ask that because my wife is from the Palestine area in East Texas and you can tell she's native too yeah Choices:  1. Ah, okay, I didn't think you were from Texas. 2. My wife is from Texas, too. 3. I grew up in Oklahoma.

2