In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

Input: Consider Input: Comment: That's the best you can come up with? 
.
I expect better, if you want my attention, at least be funny.
.
p.s. liking your own posts is forum masturbation, be careful you might wear out your mouse button.

Output: Non-identity-attack


Input: Consider Input: Comment: This was the longest hockey column on this site for eons.  It got hard to read 'bout halfway thru, the tears from this columnist's eyes dripping onto the page were smearing the words....

Of all the teams in the playoffs, Cal was the only 1 that had a losing record in reg, meaning they relied on extra time, loser pts, to get in.  They were pretenders all the way.

Their goal diff was barely to the good, barely, another stat that told us quite a bit.

And, Ana was an awful draw for them.  So, add it all up, and you get Ana winning a short series, which is what happened.

They played in a 14-team conference, in which 4 of the teams were god-awful, meaning they only had to be better than 2 of their 9 opponents.  There were better teams in the East that did not make the playoffs than Cal.

Let's move on.

Output: Non-identity-attack


Input: Consider Input: Comment: You attempt to argue against me through condescension, implying I have no background in basic science. As an undergraduate in mathematics, physical sciences, and natural sciences I encountered few students in those departments who were unaware of the nature and funding of basic science. Many of my instructors were researchers. My own father, in whose labs I worked as a boy (bottle washer) was a researcher in developmental biology with NSF grants as his primary support for forty years until his semi-retirement. I know the process. I was expected to be a scholar but didn't have the patience, I was too kinetic. Thus, a career mostly in construction and worksite management. That doesn't make me ignorant or stupid, as you seem to imply.

What you call "partisan junk", in light of the Republican attack on science in general, is condescending BS. You of all people should be grateful for any acknowledgement of the importance of research to society. Your reaction here is absolutely confounding.


Output: Non-identity-attack