TASK DEFINITION: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.
PROBLEM: Comment: While the childs life is very important however your argument about Medevac @ OMC is so spot on!  I value them trees.  people forget just how much we do need trees to live.  Its not about being 'tree huggers'  its just plain freaking common sense.  Top the damn things.

SOLUTION: Obscene

PROBLEM: Comment: Tax tax tax!   Enough!!!   Get these damn Democrats out of office already.

SOLUTION: Obscene

PROBLEM: Comment: I can understand how a "display of wealth" might "expose" some aspect of India's caste system (although I'm a bit hazy about how it would apply to South African Indians, who don't have a caste system). How "displaying wealth" could "expose" "racial prejudice" escapes me completely, I'm afraid. 

Why mention the skin tone of the Indian man? Or the newness of clothing? Or the "Afrikaans-speaking" man's language? ("How many prejudices do you have?" I ask myself.)

Seems to me, you went there for a less than honourable reason, and security spotted you immediately - not because you are black and your friend South African Indian, but because you stood out amongst those who were there for honourable reasons.

I think the Guptas are poisonous, but this kind of "journalism" serves no productive purpose.

SOLUTION:
Non-obscene