In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

[EX Q]: Comment: Oh yes, Arliss Sturgulewski.  Born Jane Wright, but I guess no one would remember that name as opposed to Arliss Sturgulewski.  Anyway, I digress.  Joe Vogler's halfway respectable showing in 1986 had much to do with Sturgulewski making it clear that she wanted nothing to do with anyone who supported any of her primary opponents.  Here in Fairbanks, the few supporters she had in 1990 were the same little coffee klatsch of liberal Republicans who would meet regularly to plot against the rest of the party.  Incidentally, one of that group wound up in Parnell's cabinet, but I likewise digress.  That same group later brought us the equally-as-disastrous choice of Jim Campbell.
[EX A]: Non-sexual-explicit

[EX Q]: Comment: But ... but ...  It's just announced that he's been Born Again!  Which means, you'd better find a thicker steel plate to cover your behind.
[EX A]: Sexual-explicit

[EX Q]: Comment: Having expressed your support above of "blowing his arse up" as a solution to the NK issue, apparently with no regard for the hundreds of thousands of resultant casualties, I really have to question who is the actual coward here.
[EX A]:
Sexual-explicit