We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

[EX Q]: Sent1: Only .06% of people who have killed kill again when they escape, are released, etc.
 Sent2: The government does not have the right to kill people.
[EX A]: Not similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: There is no reason that the death penalty, in general, should be more expensive than LWOP and, in many, if not most cases, the death penalty should be less expensive.
 Sent2: All of this information is the reason the Death penalty is so costly.
[EX A]: Not similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: The argument for the death penalty as a deterrent has been proved wrong by the implementation of it through history.
 Sent2: SO in turn, there is no clear evidence indicating that there is not a detterent value to the death penalty.
[EX A]:
Similar