In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: threat and non-threat. Threat is a statement that someone will be hurt or harmed, especially if the person does not do something in particular.

[Q]: Comment: Only one way to handle a terrorist.  Kill the SOB.
[A]: Threat


[Q]: Comment: The Canadians who responded to this poll obviously have limited horizons and are locked in the antiquated nation state paradigm.  Our illustrious, omniscient PM has leap frogged light years ahead of us and, together with a few of his equally narcissistic, delusional friends (such as Bono), sees himself as a leader of the nationless, borderless new world order.

He must find it so tiresome to have to deal with our naive lack of understanding of these things.
[A]: Non-threat


[Q]: Comment: The Corporation Counsel & NOT the police commission has the sole authority to defend lawsuits against the City for Police conduct & to determine whether or not  a City employee was within the course and scope of his duties as a police officer. If the employee with not within the course and scope of his duties to serve a legitimate City function, he would NOT be entitle to a legal defense paid for by the City.   Years ago, a police office while on duty and wearing his police uniform, statutory raped a 14 year old girl in his custody.  He argued he is entitled to be defended by the City because, he was on City time and working for the City at the time of the rape. However, the CC decided he was NOT in within the course and scope of his duties as a police officer when he raped her. It was a frolic and left city work when he raped her. The same is true for everyone, when you do illegal acts to benefit yourself, you are not entitled to be defended by the City.  You are on your own. Sorry.
[A]:
Non-threat