In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence can be inferred from the statement. Incorrect choices change the meaning in important ways or have details that are not mentioned in the statement. Indicate your answer as 1,2, or 3 corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.

Example Input: Statement: In her attitude towards Poirot, she was inclined to be suspicious, but he soon broke down her defences.  Choices:  1. Poirot was not a nice person.  2. She wasn't suspicious of Poirot.  3. She was suspicious of Poirot. 
Example Output: 3

Example Input: Statement: actually i haven't watched it much this season in the last couple of years i've been on that uh downward trend Choices:  1. It used to be appointment tv for me. 2. I've watched less and less over the past few years. 3. I would never miss an episode.
Example Output: 2

Example Input: Statement: Jurors are kept off-balance--and in need of additional guidance from the bench--by the judge, who instructs them to convict if the defendant is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, without telling them whether a reasonable doubt consists of a 1 percent risk of error, a 5 percent risk of error, or a 10 percent risk of error. Choices:  1. The judge explains every detail about error to the jurors. 2. The judge is impatient with the jurors' ignorance. 3. The judge does not give the jurors all the details about errors.
Example Output:
3