Given a document and an entity the task is to select the author's sentiment towards the entity. Sentiments can be Positive, Neutral and Negative. Select Positive if the article expresses a positive view towards the given entity or praises its quality or skills. Select Neutral if the document expresses no clear view towards the entity or has equal amounts of positive and negative statements or expressing some fact/quote by someone else. Select Negative if the article expresses a negative view towards like harsh remarks, criticizing entities action/decision etc. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

Ex Input:
What is the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Shinzo Abe ? Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe  head of the ruling Liberal Democratic Party  leaves a news conference at the partyâs headquarters in Tokyo on Oct. 23. (Kiyoshi Ota/Bloomberg News)
On Sunday  Japanâs Liberal Democratic Party won a landslide victory  winning 284 of the 465 seats in the lower house of the Diet. Prime Minister Shinzo Abeâs junior coalition partner  Komeito  added 29 seats  giving the ruling coalition a two-thirds supermajority.
In addition to freeing the LDP from a mandatory ballot challenge before 2021  Abeâs election victory provides new support for  his  efforts to amend Japanâs pacifist constitution.
 Abe  went into the election arguing that  his  track record on the economy and national security should be the decisive factor  and voters appear to have agreed. Japan faces new security challenges from two of its neighbors. North Korean missiles have passed over Japan twice in recent months  leaving Japanese citizens rattled by early-morning text alerts. And at the recent Communist Party Congress in Beijing  President Xi Jinping promised that China would be âmoving closer to center stage â raising additional concerns in Japan.
The ruling coalitionâs supermajority ensures not only that  Abe  will remain in power  but also that  he  can now push for a revision of Japanâs constitution   his  personal pledge and an unfulfilled element of the LDP platform since 1955. Although many in the public remain skeptical of the constitutional revision plan  the LDPâs success in this election represents an endorsement of the ruling coalitionâs governing ability  particularly on security issues.
[Did Trump and  Abe  just launch a new chapter in U.S.-Japan relations?]
There may also be debates within the ruling coalition on the need for Japan to deploy its own surface-to-surface missiles to enhance deterrence vis-a-vis North Korea.  Abe  has not taken a public stand on these âcounterstrike capabilities â which would to give Japan the ability to neutralize North Korean ballistic missiles on their launchpads. This would be an abrupt change from a postwar defense policy that has remained strictly defensive  with few offensive capabilities.
 Abe  will also continue moderate spending increases on Japanâs air and naval capabilities in an attempt to counter Chinaâs much higher spending on the Peopleâs Liberation Army. The numerical balance of fighter aircraft and surface combatants has been steadily shifting in Chinaâs favor for decades.
More recently  however  Xi has begun streamlining the PLA to strengthen its war-fighting effectiveness in preparation for a potential conflict in the Western Pacific.  Abe  knows that maintaining deterrence will require closer cooperation with the United States and continued reforms to break down the postwar barriers to the effectiveness of Japanâs own forces.
Will  Abe  revise Japanâs constitution?
Two years ago   Abe  pushed through a reinterpretation of the constitution to allow new defense guidelines and operations with the United States and other like-minded states. Many in  his  party support revising the second half of Article 9 to declare that Japanâs military is constitutional  though intended only for self-defense.
Support from pacifist-leaning coalition partner Komeito will probably be forthcoming  and friendly governments such as the United States and Australia are likely to be supportive as well. China will protest  as might South Korea  but polls elsewhere in the region suggest that Japan has moved beyond its wartime image. Nevertheless  Article 9 is highly political and ideological;  Abe  will have to carry out  his  promise to build domestic consensus before proceeding.
Despite President Trumpâs harsh rhetoric about Japan during  his  election campaign   Abe  has deftly engaged with the new administration in Washington and managed to build significant trust with Trump.  Abe  was the first foreign leader to visit Trump  and Trump will start  his  first Asia tour by spending several days in Japan in November.
Trumpâs tough line on North Korea is likely to be well received in Japan  but  his  hostile view toward trade (particularly the rejection of the Trans-Pacific Partnership) continues to perplex Tokyo. Japanese leaders argue that allies should be leading on rulemaking to manage the mercantilist challenge from China.

Ex Output:
Positive


Ex Input:
What is the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Harry Potter ? LONDON (Reuters) -  Harry Potter  is continuing to work  his  magic for publisher Bloomsbury (BLPU.L) 20 years after  his  debut  with special editions of  his  first adventure helping revenue rise 15 percent.
FILE PHOTO: Copies of the book of the play of  Harry Potter  and the Cursed Child parts One and Two are displayed at a bookstore in London  Britain July 31  2016. REUTERS/Neil Hall/File Photo
Bloomsbury released new editions of J.K. Rowling’s “ Harry Potter  and the Philosopher’s Stone” with covers dedicated to wizarding school Hogwarts’ houses Gryffindor  Slytherin  Hufflepuff and Ravenclaw to mark the anniversary in June.
 Revenue from Harry Potter  grew 40 percent in the period   the company  said on Tuesday  and the young wizard and  his  magical world will feature strongly in the publisher’s assault on the important Christmas market.
“We have a strong second-half list including the illustrated edition of ‘ Harry Potter  and the Prisoner of Azkaban ’ the illustrated edition of ‘Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them’ and two major books to accompany the British Library’s  Harry Potter  exhibition ” said Chief Executive Nigel Newton.
FILE PHOTO: A woman holds copies of the book of the play of  Harry Potter  and the Cursed Child parts One and Two at a bookstore in London  Britain July 31  2016. REUTERS/Neil Hall/File Photo
Analyst Steve Liechti at Investec said Bloomsbury’s second-half list looked strong  with cookery titles from Paul Hollywood  Tom Kerridge and Hugh Fearnley-Whittingstall as well as the new Harry Potter editions.

Ex Output:
Positive


Ex Input:
What is the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Taylor Swift ? Taylor Swift  performs in Houston. (John Salangsang/Invision/AP)
In Washington  an army of UPS trucks is swarming the city plastered with signs promising a #TaylorSwiftDelivery: the pop singerâs sixth album  âReputation â out Nov. 10. Four already released tracks tease a darker tone where the âold  Taylor â is âdeadâ and a reinvention of one of the most successful artists in the world. Itâs not enough to appease feminist critics  however.
Itâs been quite a year for  Swift   who has matured in public in a way few female stars have the courage to    staging a dispute between  her  different public âselvesâ in a video for  her  song âLook What You Made Me Doâ earlier this year. Meanwhile   she  pursued a lawsuit against a former radio host whom  she  accused of groping  her  in 2013  a move heralded by the Guardian as a âuniversal feminist statementâ long before #MeToo.  Swift  has openly embraced feminism since 2014 and tweeted in support of the Womenâs March in January  so you might think  given our current focus on womenâs rights and dignity  that âReputationâ would land with a girl-power splash.
But youâd be wrong. Very wrong. In fact   Swift  is already under fire from feminist critics. And their attacks reveal something very ugly about modern feminism: While todayâs feminists claim to champion the rights of all women  they speak only for women who agree with them â vocally  frequently and on demand.
[Sorry   Taylor Swift . Being a feminist is about more than supporting your girlfriends.]
Anticipating âReputation â Bustle editor Rachel Simon insisted that the 27-year-old Swift âcanât just say that the media has painted her as a fake feminist or a manipulative liar; she needs to say âI deserved it.â â Even after her sexual assault lawsuit  feminists pounced on  Swift . Salon writer Rachel Leah retorted that  Swift  is âknown to wave the feminist banner only when it directly benefits her.â Bustle agreed  decrying  Swift âs feminism as a âdeeply flawed â âself-servingâ âwhite feminism.â
As proof of her feminist failures  editor Kadeen Griffiths listed  Swift âs many faults: not criticizing President Trump  not âpublicly support[ing] organizationsâ like Planned Parenthood and not attending the Womenâs March (her tweet apparently wasnât enough.) Outlet after outlet has pressured  Swift  to condemn the president in the name of feminism. In January  the Daily Beast went so far as to accuse her of âSpineless Feminism.â  Swift  may be the highest-paid artist in the world   but her decision to speak out on issues as she pleases rather than as others call on her to means she gets little credit for the space sheâs made for female artists.
[The ACLU slams Taylor Swift for trying to protect her reputation]
We have no idea what  Taylor Swift  thinks about any number of specific political issues: how  she  feels about Trump  what  she  thinks the goals of feminism ought to be  where  she  comes down on abortion or anything else. But the ongoing denouncement of  Swift  proves that you donât even have to have convictions as firm as antiabortion feminists to be counted out of todayâs movement. All it takes to get exiled is to not affirm the party line loudly enough. And for any movement seeking to advance the cause of women as a whole  thatâs a problem.
The test of a feministâs commitment should be how  she  treats women who are different from  her . It shouldnât matter if  Swift  agrees or disagrees  if  she  speaks or remains silent. We should applaud  her  ability as a person  independent  with  her  own heart and mind  to be who  she  wishes. The same should go for any number of women who hold different political views but agree that womenâs voices should be a part of the national conversation. Their feminism is real  their perspectives matter  and they should be welcome to contribute to a movement that promotes womenâs welfare and status. That should be feminismâs reputation.

Ex Output:

Positive