TASK DEFINITION: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.
PROBLEM: Where is your true sympathy for folks like Suzanna Gratia Hupp who were disarmed by government edicts (unconstitutionally) while we arm our enemies of America and gun grabber/anti-Constitutionalists?

SOLUTION: Valid

PROBLEM: It contends that, as recognized in Heller, the Second Amendment does not prevent the government from prohibiting firearms in sensitive places, which includes GMU's university buildings and widely attended university events.

SOLUTION: Valid

PROBLEM: Guns in people's homes have prevented them from being victims of violent attacks in countless thousands of cases, and your militia you refer to was composed of regular urban men, not military men and they were armed.

SOLUTION:
Valid