In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

[Q]: Comment: Canada's ash my ass, its Alaska's ash!
[A]: Obscene


[Q]: Comment: FM:  If you dislike dishonesty don't look in a mirror.
[A]: Non-obscene


[Q]: Comment: Quotes from the FIN hearing:

DeCoite – I’d like to see “a solid business plan.”

Lopresti –  “lack of accountability.”  Feels like he was “lied to.”  “Not sure whether it’s incompetence or malfeasance.”  Doesn’t “feel like there’s a third party we can turn to to check numbers.”  It’s “deeply upsetting.”  First TOD “dropped the ball,” because there was no affordable housing included.

Luke – Lack of ridership information at hearing “goes beyond apologizing.”  “We expect you to be prepared fully.”  In regards to taxes paid by nonresidents - “Do not misrepresent . . . ”  “In perpetuity is crazy.”

DeCoite – In reference to $315 million in contingency that was used up between September and January - “bleeding.”
[A]:
Non-obscene