In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Q: Comment: Yes, the VAGINA negates everything, unless it's being used for making more rethuglican rugrats, pleasure, or, on rare occasion, shooting Ping Pong balls.

At least that's how the GOP view women.

A: Sexual-explicit
****
Q: Comment: Was she? She earned it and paid taxes...that's conservative. She said things that were worth hearing based on market forces...that conservative. She was one of the smartest leaders of the free world...that merit, that's conservative values. Wow, the devil in a pants suit for sure...too conservative for me.

A: Non-sexual-explicit
****
Q: Comment: The Church teaches infallibly in Christ's name. It has always taught that the unjustified taking of an innocent human life, which is the very definition of abortion, is intrinsically, gravely sinful. This is a dogma.

Capital punishment, on the other hand, may be used, licitly, under certain conditions. 

Obviously, there's a difference between the two issues from a morality standpoint. Show me where I'm wrong.

A:
Non-sexual-explicit
****