In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine the neutral choice based on your inference from the statement and your commonsense knowledge. The neutral choice is a sentence that neither agrees nor disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3', corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence. If sentence X agrees with sentence Y, one's correctness follows from the other one. If sentence X disagrees with sentence Y, they can not be correct at the same time.

[EX Q]: Statement: which surprised me that that uh through the jury discussion they were able to convince him against his original opinion so maybe that speaks well for juries Choices: 1. Jury discussions never change anyone's opinions.  2. Jury discussions often result in people changing their original opinions.  3. Through jury discussion, they were able to convince him to abandon his original opinion; perhaps that speaks well of juries. 
[EX A]: 2

[EX Q]: Statement: For purposes of this simulation, the amount of allowances banked from 2002 through 2006 was calculated as the simple difference between the reference case projections and the actual emission trajectory of each scenario. Choices: 1. The simulation incorrectly calculated allowances backed. 2. The simulation did not calculate anything. 3. The simulation calculated allowances backed.
[EX A]: 1

[EX Q]: Statement: What the imaginary quilting business did produce was a loan that she and her husband, Linn, who is 86 and suffers from congestive heart failure, cannot possibly afford. Choices: 1. They wanted to use the money for medical bills. 2. The fake business idea got the elderly couple a loan that was outside of their means. 3. The young couple got a loan to open their own business.
[EX A]:
1