In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

Sentence: Bob paid for Charlie's college education. He is very grateful.
 Reason: The 'He' refers to charlie because he is the only other person with that name. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Wrong

Sentence: I put the butterfly wing on the table and it broke.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the butterfly wing because the wings are the main body of the butterfly, which is a very unusual shape. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Wrong

Sentence: The sack of potatoes had been placed above the bag of flour, so it had to be moved first.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the sack of potatoes because it was placed above the flour and because it was placed above the bag of flour it was impossible to. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

Correct