In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

[EX Q]: Comment: I find it interesting that so often the media, including this article does not quote the Koran. "Convert, enslave or kill the people of the book" - referring to Christians and Jews. 

Sharia Law - not all men are created equal and women are considered chattel. 

Those who think Islam is as its meaning 'peace' is peaceful knows nothing about history. Just ask the 250 million dead what Islam is about. 

Islam is an political ideology which enslaves and is anathema to Western civilization which holds to the view all people have inalienable rights which the state has a responsibility to protect.  

I don't just let anyone come into my home and no country should just allow anyone to come into their country.
[EX A]: Non-sexual-explicit

[EX Q]: Comment: Well, now, up until the last sentence I was willing to consider your point of view.  But you had to inject a racist comment, and that invalidated your entire post as far as I'm concerned. Yes, people who denigrate whites are just as racist as those who commit racial slurs against blacks or Latinos or other people of color.  It is apparent that you don't like whites in Langley ("that is a shame").  So, Mstraub, to you I say:  suck it up, cupcake and soldier on, we're here to stay.
[EX A]: Non-sexual-explicit

[EX Q]: Comment: Even after all the money that Norton (aka "landslide") and other bigwigs raised and the non-stop campaigning??  I would tagged it as "too close to call".  Damn, you do some crabby neighbors. :)  Thanks for the reply.
[EX A]:
Non-sexual-explicit