TASK DEFINITION: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.
PROBLEM: It evolved into a discussion about how a violent encounter was (by some) preferable to be entered with fists rather than guns, as it would be less dangerous.

SOLUTION: Valid

PROBLEM: 35) Private citizens don't need a gun for self-protection because the police are there to protect them even though the Supreme Court says the police are not responsible for their protection.

SOLUTION: Valid

PROBLEM: Statistics gathered by various branches of the justice department reveal that only a minuscule number of criminals acquired their guns at gun shows.

SOLUTION:
Valid