The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.

Q: Context: 'Hello, are there any of the three items that you want to be sure you have enough of? 🙂' 'I want to be sure that I have enough firewood.  I want to relax, sit around the campfire, and roast hot dogs and marshmallows.  What about you?'
Utterance: 'That sounds great! I like all three items, but I definitely want to make sure I have enough water, especially to drink and stay hydrated and full of as much energy as possible. I require a lot of liquid as a 6-foot-4, 260-pound guy!'

A: No
****
Q: Context: 'Hello there.' 'hi' 'So I plan to go hiking a lot this trip and I would appreciate a majority of the water and firewood if possible.'
Utterance: 'I want to go on hiking too. Since I don't go alone I need food and water.'

A: Yes
****
Q: Context: 'If you need water for a medical issue the of course you can have two waters.' 'You are being very kind then, im elderly so trying to make fresh water by boiling it from getting it from a river was concerning to me. How about you take all three of the food for your kiddo's' 'That sounds fair. The kids can bathe in the stream. We are good with 2 food packs.'
Utterance: 'Lol, wish i could. Then you take all 3 of the firewood, I'll take 2 of the Water and 1 of the food, sound good?'

A:
No
****