Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.

Disappointing news. While I  agreed with the 'separation of powers' argument, I remain firmly against expanding more free programs. The Alaska Constitution only calls for
".... the promotion and protection of public health." (Article 7 ss 4); that's very different from government funded health care based solely on income levels, which is exactly what Medicaid is.
No

The decision was made to ban smoking and drones in Eugene parks, yet it continues in spades at Amazon Park ,  Skinner Butte and especially Alton Baker.  To boot, lawmakers want to give smoker's " a 3 month white glove treatment for 'education '  "   That's infuriating for those of us who frequently exercise in our parks and routinely encounter/ breathe in second- hand smoke.  This law is a huge joke, it will NEVER be enforced, and smokers will continue to have the unopposed the upper hand and run amuck,  smoking to their heart's content.
Yes

I can't help but wonder what other "software" tools are being used in Alaska by police and the "criminal justice system?"  See for example what's happening elsewhere:

"The new way police are surveilling you: Calculating your threat ‘score’"

https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/public-safety/the-new-way-police-are-surveilling-you-calculating-your-threat-score/2016/01/10/e42bccac-8e15-11e5-baf4-bdf37355da0c_story.html

=and=

"Why Government Use of Social Media Monitoring Software Is a Direct Threat to Our Liberty and Privacy"

https://www.aclu.org/blog/speak-freely/why-government-use-social-media-monitoring-software-direct-threat-our-liberty-and

Yes