We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

And to respond to you, those childre n are orhans now because their father was killed not able to defend himself.
Valid

I would argue, for example, that since so called ���assault weapons��� are not as common today as handguns then they must be more ���dangerous and unususal��� and therefore more subject to a ban.
Valid

Do you have any proof that would support your claim that gun owners aren't taking proper care to ensure that their guns don't get stolen?

Valid