We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Input: Consider Input: Sent1: In fact, gun control laws have been around for over 200 years so apparently the founding fathers didn't see the second amendment as a barrier to such laws.
 Sent2: The second amendment was included in the constitution as insurance against a time when it is not so unlikely.

Output: Not similar


Input: Consider Input: Sent1: Gun control laws will not work because criminals do not obey gun control laws!
 Sent2: If this is the case, then gun laws have a provable effect on how 'armed' criminals are - more gun control = less gun-carrying criminals, fact.

Output: Not similar


Input: Consider Input: Sent1: Why do people that want what they call reasonable limits on the right to bear arms believe criminals will obey a law stating criminals cannot have guns?
 Sent2: That most people can't be trusted, so we should have more laws against guns, which most people will abide by because they can be trusted.


Output: Not similar