We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

[Q]: Sent1: The people who qualify for the death penalty are charged with committing some considerably heinous crime(s) that society has deemed unacceptable.
 Sent2: (4)Death penalty does not intimidate people from committing a crime.
[A]: Not similar


[Q]: Sent1: The person who said that the death penalty should be used for people who are convicted of multiple-burglaries sounds like a complete knucklehead.
 Sent2: When someone mentions a criminal deterrence factor with death sentences, it sounds like a bad joke or total ignorance.
[A]: Not similar


[Q]: Sent1: Again I want to reiterate that I am not in favor of an anarchist society where there is no consequences for committing crimes, my point is that society is better served by life imprisonment than the death penalty.
 Sent2: I would prefer to live in a society where no death penalty was handed out cause there was no crime.
[A]:
Not similar