In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Input: Consider Input: Comment: Thanks for the historical perspective. Always worth while.
Whom the gods would destroy they first drive mad. We already have the  mad part of Trump covered.

Output: Non-obscene


Input: Consider Input: Comment: Bloody hell your column should be sucked up by the waste disposal truck. That is all it is worth and stinks just as bad.
No reporter  has ever mentioned the support of the atrocities committed by Batista supported and sanctioned by the U.S. government  Done to protect callous landowners of sugar plantations from their own workers. The States sent in their Marines several times to put down sugar plantation workers.

The U. S. dominated and directed all aspects of life in Cuba from the end of the Spanish War to Castro's overthrow of Batista.. Castro would not take directions from the Americans to put Cuba under American thumbs so they made 20 attempts to kill him.

A doctrine that many, many people over look is the Monroe Doctrine. States basically that only the U. S. can interfere with governments in the Western Hemisphere!

Output: Obscene


Input: Consider Input: Comment: No.....he's pointing out the hypocrisy of Texas Republicans---similar to the time their state legislature wanted to pass a bill outlawing the hiring of illegals, unless they were maids and gardeners.

Learn some reading comprehension sometime.  It will help you not to come off so foolish.


Output: Non-obscene