In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.

Comment: That's so the ROC can bankroll Quebec to provide such social goodies as dirt cheap post-secondary education and daycare to their residents ... the West have to stop being so nice or they'll continue to be taken advantage of.
Agree

Comment: You bring up a really good point about the grocery stores.  When I lived in Asia there were certain foods that I just craved, but could never get.  I didn't feel as though there was some Asian privilege going on.  Rather I realized it was the market.  If there were enough white dudes who wanted to buy something it would have been there.  But there weren't.  I never thought of boohooing about it and claiming I was discriminated against.  Instead, I tried new foods and enjoyed the culture that I was so lucky to get to enjoy.  Now, back home, I have such fond memories and now I search out the foods at Asian markets that I ate and loved when I was there.  And I introduced foods to my family members.  I was appalled when a family member had never had a mango.  We got some and he loved it!  

This white privilege business is nonsense by social justice warriors who never lived through the hard times and want to make a mountain out of a mole hill.
Agree

Comment: This is so dumb.

Don't folks know we keep the souls at Poker Flats and the bodies at HAARP?
Any zombie apocalypse expert knows you never want the two to meet.

Agree