In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

Q: Sentence: Susan knew that Ann's son had been in a car accident, so she told her about it.
 Reason: The 'she' refers to susan because Susan knew that Ann's son had been in a car accident she told her about it. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

A: Wrong
****
Q: Sentence: The woman held the girl against her chest
 Reason: The 'her' refers to the woman because he girl against her will because the woman. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

A: Wrong
****
Q: Sentence: The path to the lake was blocked, so we couldn't reach it .
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the lake because the name is a reference to the lake which is located in Turkey. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

A:
Wrong
****