We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.
--------
Question: Long the dominant view of the Second Amendment, and widely accepted by the federal courts, the collective rights model has recently come under strong criticism from individual rights advocates.

Answer: Valid


Question: You can't just claim "Country A has more gun control and a lower homicide rate than Country B does" and leave it at that.

Answer: Valid


Question: Now he is getting off topic on an argument he cannot sustain by trying to discredit the militia clause of the Second Amendment and argue for less rights and more gun control.

Answer:
Valid