Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.

Ex Input:
Dividends have been less than a thousand in the past.  And the market is down from 2014 (after which the Senate became G.O.P. dominated and the economic recovery began plateauing).  Why would be "guarantee" a thousand?  This, of course, is the G.O.P. again showing their inability to remember recent history (like the oil crash of the 1980s) and a lack of smarts.

Ex Output:
No


Ex Input:
Brought to you by SEIU 503, AFSCME, and all those other union corporations who represent the teachers, State bureaucrats, police, firemen, county employees, city employees, and University of Oregon employees.  

You know, the people who will benefit by "increasing public employment by 17,700" while "Oregonians with incomes of less than $21,000 would pay an additional $372 a year under IP 28" to support  their greed. 

 And who are least able to pay when ",low-income Oregonians would be hit the hardest, and there would be no exemptions for essential purchases such as food, utilities and pharmaceuticals."

Ex Output:
Yes


Ex Input:
Then tell those women not to call a guy when he knocks her up..cause you know...it's none of his business what's in her uterus.

Ex Output:

Yes