We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

[Q]: Whether or not government should be dipping its fingers into matters concerning insurance records is a separate matter from government maintaining independent databases of private information.
[A]: Valid


[Q]: A lot of the most popular laws (unconstitutional in my estimation from many court cases) were examined by the CDC and NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCE and found no benefit IN ANY OF THE CURRENT ILLEGAL GUN REGULATION/BAN LAWS.
[A]: Valid


[Q]: A recent example of how gun control really saved a situation check out something that happened in Sydney recently thats not too unlike the School attacks that have resulted in massacres in the USA
[A]:
Valid