We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gay Marriage)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Ex Input:
Sent1: I also don't think that in whatever case that comes before it, the Supreme Court is going to refer to gay couples being treated with "indifference."
 Sent2: There are several amendments guaranteeing rights that were not given before, and I can't see any reason why gay marriage should be any exception to this precedent.

Ex Output:
Not similar


Ex Input:
Sent1: The upshot for ��_��__��_��__��_��__pro-family��_��__��_��__ groups is that if heterosexuals keep screwing up marriage, by the time gay people finally win the right nationally, we won��_��__��_��__t want to use it.
 Sent2: And some people, who happen to dislike gay people, should not be allowed to use the state to aim discriminatory laws against gay people.

Ex Output:
Not similar


Ex Input:
Sent1: The argument in favor of same-sex marriage is based on religion often as well; whole bunches of people hold religious beliefs which state that marriage is between any two people who are not related by family.
 Sent2: However, some arguments in support of same-sex marriage have nothing to do with polygamous marriage.

Ex Output:

Not similar