We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

[Q]: I'll freely admit that there is a larger jump between guns and nukes than knives and guns, but there is still a direct difference in lethality.
[A]: Valid


[Q]: A firearm in mearley an inanimate piece of steel that has no mind of its own and cant function without the intervention of human control over it.
[A]: Valid


[Q]: Too many gun control proponents try to suggest that the RKBA does not exist in our own Constitution, and that our Constitution trumps these older English rights.
[A]:
Valid