We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Q: Sent1: A death penalty case is likely to be appealed as high as it will be taken.
 Sent2: Death penalty cases involve a lot of appeals and them lawyers are really expensive.

A: Similar
****
Q: Sent1: If it must be, then we shall find a way to improve these peoples habits, not kill them because they aren't 'like us'.
 Sent2: When a person does something horrible, we no longer see them as a human that values their life, we just see them as an epitome of hate.

A: Not similar
****
Q: Sent1: I know the eye for an eye statement is wrong.
 Sent2: So far, I am hearing "an eye for an eye" which is just that vengeance centered sense of justice that I am arguing against.

A:
Similar
****