The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the no-need strategy, otherwise output No. no-need is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used when a participant points out that they do not need an item based on personal context such as suggesting that they have ample water to spare. no-need can directly benefit the opponent since it implies that the item is up for grabs.

[Q]: Context: 'Are you willing to take 1 firewood and 2 waters?  I also don't need the food.' 'yeah for sure.  sounds liek a godo trade to me honestly' 'Great!  Sounds like a deal.  Enjoy your camping trip!'
Utterance: 'you too thanks'
[A]: No


[Q]: Context: 'why would you not just take 2 packs of each whiile i onlt keep 1?' 'Alright fair enough, let me have 3 on food, 1 on firewood and 1 on water. This trip means alot to me' 'i can do that for you, in on a diet anyways and already have a stock ive been working on since fall'
Utterance: 'oh well that's fantastic, so let me know what your deal is'
[A]: No


[Q]: Context: 'yeah. going good.' 'good to hear' 'How about the deal? '
Utterance: 'Sure. My kids are really looking forward to this camping trip but one has special needs and he has to have a specific diet. I am fairly flexible on the water and firewood but food is a must have for me.'
[A]:
Yes