In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

[Q]: Sentence: Paul tried to call George on the phone, but he wasn't available.
 Reason: The 'he' refers to george because George was likely the one not reachable. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
[A]: Correct


[Q]: Sentence: The man couldn't lift his son because he was so heavy.
 Reason: The 'he' refers to the son because The man was trying to lift his show who was too heavy.  The referred to the son. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
[A]: Correct


[Q]: Sentence: Sam pulled up a chair to the piano, but it was broken, so he had to stand instead.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the chair because Sam had to stand; therefore the chair must be broken. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
[A]:
Correct