We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

[Q]: Would you really want a public with an armed force of unknown size, strength, mobilty, location, organizational structure and intention anywhere in your country?
[A]: Valid


[Q]: That's what happens when your argument is so poor it's impossible to distinguish what is actually a point
[A]: Invalid


[Q]: Guns in the hands of law abiding citizens save lives, the statistics back this up from EVERY country EVER to introduce gun control.
[A]:
Valid