The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.

[EX Q]: Context: 'Tell me, how stocked up are you on food and firewood?' 'I have firewood, what I need mainly is water, then food' 'Ah, I see. I have plenty of firewood as well but mostly need food and some water.'
Utterance: 'so let me suggest a split, I get two water and two food, you get one food, one water and three firewood'
[EX A]: No

[EX Q]: Context: 'so If I understand correctly, the Deal is I get 3 Food and 2 Water: While you get 3 Firewood and 1 Water?' 'I was just negotiating the water for now.  I was trying to do one at a time.' 'ah, I'm definitely ok with doing one at a time: A 2:1 split is definitely OK with me: The issue is, if we consider each individually, it might be harder to come to a deal, but I'm happy to do it your way.'
Utterance: 'How about you take 1 firewood, I''l take 2 and with food, you can have 2 and I'll take one package.  I have two very hungry boys!'
[EX A]: Yes

[EX Q]: Context: 'Okay, so how about I get 1 food, and 3 firewood and 1 water, and you get 2 food, 0 firewood, and 2 water' 'sounds great' 'great! sounds good to me'
Utterance: 'ok ready to make the deal'
[EX A]:
No