Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.

Q: I would have like the story better is she had beat the livin' out of this kid with her walker.

A: Yes
****
Q: No I did not. You promoted the idea that children are sissies if they can't take pain.

I simply counter pointed that with the fact that physical pain is not a gauge of anything and if you want to call kids sissies for not wanting to get hurt. 

This while the adult population of this countries is undergoing a rash of adults hooked on opiate pain killers, because you know, adults use medicine to take care of and manage their pain, but lets not do that for children cause we don't want them soft. Right?

Just because we as a society don't agree with the idea of children in pain doesn't make us wussies or sissies or wimps or whatever name you have poised on your tongue to call us. It means we care about children and want them to have a better life than us, and if it is one filled with less pain, I do not see how that is a bad thing. Care to enlighten me how it is a good thing?

A: Yes
****
Q: I hope they are practicing for what happens if there is an oil spill in the arctic.  You know that some country is going to start sending oil tankers that route at some point, so that possibility will be on the table.  And I am not just suggesting taking oil from the North Slope either.  Oil might come from Europe and go over the top towards China, for example.  Tankers like that going through could have an accident which we might not be prepared for.

That brings up another issue.  Are we all really prepared for so many other countries having an interest in the area, and trying to swagger about?  Up till now that was a nice frozen buffer between the U.S., Russia, and Canada.  Now that whole place will be increasing international issues each and every day.

A:
No
****