In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

Input: Consider Input: Sentence: Look! There is a minnow swimming right below that duck! It had better get away to safety fast!
 Reason: The 'It' refers to the minnow because it can swim, but it has never been seen before. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

Output: Wrong


Input: Consider Input: Sentence: Joan made sure to thank Susan for all the help she had given.
 Reason: The 'she' refers to susan because receive help is more likely to thank. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

Output: Wrong


Input: Consider Input: Sentence: The actress used to be named Terpsichore, but she changed it to Tina a  few years ago, because she figured it was easier to pronounce.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to tina because the name terpischore was too hard so tina was changed. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 


Output: Correct