We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

[Q]: Do you expect 12 executions per year to deter a murder rate of the above mentioned amount?
[A]: Valid


[Q]: If I could be satisfactorily convinced that a murderer had ZERO chance of committing another crime, I might be convinced to do away with the death penalty.
[A]: Valid


[Q]: One might claim that the death penalty in some ways pays back the victim's family for the suffering of the victim, but that is exactly the public vengeance reason that I am arguing is the only real one presented.
[A]:
Valid