In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine the neutral choice based on your inference from the statement and your commonsense knowledge. The neutral choice is a sentence that neither agrees nor disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3', corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence. If sentence X agrees with sentence Y, one's correctness follows from the other one. If sentence X disagrees with sentence Y, they can not be correct at the same time.

Ex Input:
Statement: If two Internet users own the right software, they can talk by telephone over the Net. Choices: 1. It is impossible for Internet to talk using net. 2. Two Internet users can talk to each other for free using Net. 3. Two Internet users can communicate with each other using the Net.

Ex Output:
2


Ex Input:
Statement: (Well, for Skadden it's not such a mystery, considering that Slate is part of the name of the D.C. law firm Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher &amp; Flom.) Choices: 1. Slate is part of a law office's name. 2. Slate is not related to the law firm it shares a name with. 3. Slate is just a law firm.

Ex Output:
2


Ex Input:
Statement: The French peasants' cry for freedom prompted another Maroon War on Jamaica, after which many Maroons were deported to Nova Scotia. Choices: 1. French peasants never wanted freedom so there was no war. 2. Maroons were deported to Nova Scotia  after the Maroon war on Jamaica. 3. In retaliation for the Maroon war on Jamaica, some Maroons were deported.

Ex Output:

3