TASK DEFINITION: Given a document, generate a short title of the document. The title should convey the main idea/event/topic about which the document is being written. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].
PROBLEM: In the end  even Meyer was surprised by what he pulled off.
 "I've gotten myself in trouble before by anointing players before they are deserving of it " he said. "But as far as the defensive front  I don't know if I've ever seen one like this.  In certain areas  I'd have to say it's the best we've ever done."
 NATIONAL PRESENCE: When Meyer arrived in 2005  he said his goal was to primarily recruit regionally. But a strange thing happened over the past five years: Florida has been so successful  it can't help but get recruits from across the country. This year's class has players from seven states other than Florida.
 "My first year in 2005 we went and tried to recruit (nationally)  and we didn't have that brand " Meyer said. "I think with the evolution of the media coverage and the performance of our players  Florida has become a national brand right now. We'll go cherry pick a few for a certain reason."
 BIGGEST NAME: DE Ronald Powell. His presence is significant in many ways  most notably where he's from. Meyer lured Powell from his home that's 90 miles from Southern Cal  then held onto him after Lane Kiffin was hired at USC. Also  Powell is considered the No. 1 player in the nation by several recruiting sites.
 BIGGEST COUP: Tampa Catholic OL Chaz Green. Meyer said the Gators began recruiting Green during his junior year but admits Florida started to fall off the radar with Green during the recruiting process. But assistant coach Dan McCarney refused to give up. And neither would Meyer. "There was about a month when Chaz didn't pick up my phone calls " Meyer said. "Then  bang  all of a sudden he started answering my phone calls.  When he told us he was coming  that was a great day for us because we worked awful hard on that one."
 CLASS SURPRISES: Connecticut QB Tyler Murphy  Atlanta LB Michael Taylor and Homestead LB Darrin Kitchens. With current backup QB Jordan Reed preparing to move to tight end  the Gators needed a backup for John Brantley and early enrollee Trey Burton. They began recruiting Murphy late  and it helped that offensive line coach Steve Addazio was once a classmate of Murphy's father. "He's a freakish athlete with the ball in his hands " Meyer said. As for Taylor  Meyer said  "We were on his radar. He was not on ours. That was our error not to be in the middle of that one." Taylor was MVP for his team in the Under Armour High School All-Star Game at Tropicana Field last month. Kitchens runs a sub-11 100 meters and is a special teams player. "He came up on a visit and kind of stole our heart " Meyer said.

SOLUTION: MEYER SEES A CLASS WITH POTENTIAL FOR GREATNESS

PROBLEM: In 1992  Clint Eastwoodâs  âUnforgivenâ won four Academy Awards and sent  his  career on an entirely new trajectory.
Yes  it was a Western and  Eastwood  had made plenty of those already but  âUnforgiven â was different. It had some action but mostly it was a bleak character study and was regarded by many as âart.â Whether intending to or  not Eastwood  had become an auteur.
In the wake of this critical and artistic breakthrough  Warner Brothers â  Eastwood âs exclusive distributor for  his  entire output as a director since  his  debut âPlay Misty for Meâ in 1971 â began to position not all but most of  his  future efforts as âOscar bait.â Thirteen of Eastwoodâs next 19 films came out in the fall â the highly-treasured time of year reserved for awards contenders. The six that were not released in autumn were low achievers such as âAbsolute Powerâ and âBlood Workâ and lightweight fluff like the senior citizen buddy comedy âSpace Cowboysâ and the bizarre misfire that was âJersey Boys.â
Warner Brotherâs long term  Eastwood  strategy paid off in spades. Since and including âUnforgiven â Eastwoodâs films have been nominated for 35 Oscars and have won 12 with  Eastwood himself  walking away with four as well as receiving the prestigious Irving G. Thalberg Memorial Award in 1994.
Less than a dozen people have won more Oscars than  Eastwood  and most of those were in technical categories. Not bad for a guy who used to co-star with monkeys.
Beginning in 2006 with âFlags of Our Fathersâ and âLetters from Iwo Jimaâ (shot at the same time but released three months apart)  Eastwoodâs choice of material started to change. The political content began to increase (âJ. Edgar â âInvictus â âGran Torinoâ) and although not overt it confirmed what many had known for a while:  Eastwood  was a conservative. While a moderate on most social issues   Eastwood  considers  himself  a âpragmatic Libertarianâ who eschews political correctness and  his  output in the last dozen years has indicated that  he âs an unabashed patriot.
While not a backer of most American Wars  he âs a staunch and unwavering supporter of armed service personnel  a point made with unmistakable clarity in âAmerican Sniper.â In addition to being the highest-grossing movie of 2014 and Eastwoodâs career  this throttling and unflinching bio-drama about the late Chris Kyle (Bradley Cooper) lit a welcomed fire under red state Middle America.  Eastwood  pulled off a delicate balancing act by crafting an inspirational  crowd-pleasing film that didnât pander while acknowledging the efforts of an American hero without addressing the war itself.
âThe 15:17 to Parisâ â the new movie about the three soldiers that thwarted the 2015 Thlys Train Attack â opens this Friday and it is the first  Eastwood  movie in at least 20 years that was not made available for advance press viewing.
Instead of hiring regular actors to portray the leads   Eastwood  cast the actual soldiers who confronted the terrorist â a bold move indeed and one sure to appeal to fans of âAmerican Sniper.â

SOLUTION: Is Hollywood Turning on Clint Eastwood and '15:17 to Paris'?

PROBLEM: ON SEPTEMBER 11th  a 17-year-old girl was apprehended as she illegally crossed into America from Mexico. Now nearly 16 weeks pregnant  the girlâknown as Jane Doe or  J.D.  to protect her privacyâwould like to have an abortion. But her custodian at a detention centre in Brownsville  Texasâthe Department of Health and Human Services (HHS)âis refusing her request. The government will "protect the well-being of this minor and all children and their babies in our facilitiesâ  an HHS spokesman explained. â[W]e will defend human dignity for all in our care." On October 18th  a federal judge instructed the federal government to grant  J.D. âs wish  but two days later  a three-judge panel on the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit froze that order until October 31st by a 2-1 vote. If by that date the authorities have not found a sponsor âcapable of providing for the childâs physical and mental well-beingâ who could help her procure an abortion  the court held   J.D.  may return to court to plead her case anew.
Meanwhile  via her lawyers at the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU)   J.D.  is asking the appeals court to reconsider her case âen bancââwith the full complement of judges. Time is of the essence: while bureaucrats and judges wrangle over her fate   J.D.âs  pregnancy rolls toward 20 weeks  the point at which abortion is no longer available in Texas. The ACLU told the appeals court on October 22nd that its panel decision âviolates decades of well-settled Supreme Court precedentâ barring the government from imposing âan undue burden onâor  as in this extraordinary case  completely block[ing]âa womanâs ability to obtain an abortionâ.
The holding pattern for  J.D.  began nearly a month ago. âAll the while  this young  isolated woman remains pregnant against her will  causing her irreparable harmâ  the ACLU wrote. Every day   J.D.  faces a âsevere strain...both physically and emotionallyâ and abortion becomes a riskier  more fraught procedure. The young womanâs lawyers ask the federal government to simply get out of the way: âHer court-appointed representatives or the shelter personnel stand ready to transport her; the health centre stands ready to provide the care; and private funds have been provided to pay for the procedureâ. In sum  "[a]ll defendants must do is to step aside and stop blocking the doorâ.
The ACLU brief includes a few lines from a stinging opinion penned by Judge Patricia Millett  the dissenter in the appeals court ruling on October 20th. The governmentâs refusal to grant the young womanâs wish âsacrificesâ her âconstitutional liberty  autonomy and personal dignity for no justifiable governmental reasonâ  Judge Millett wrote. Its decision represents âan astonishing power grabâ  ignoring the fact that âthis child fled here all alone in a desperate effort to avoid severe abuseâ and embarked on âa life-imperiling trek for hundreds  perhaps thousands  of milesâ.  J.D.  and other â[u]naccompanied minor migrants are among the most vulnerable persons in the worldâ.
In its response to the young womanâs request for a court-wide re-hearing  the Department of Justice (DoJ) raised three curious pointsânone of which  interestingly  denies that  J.D.  has a right to an abortion. First  the DoJ explained that if  J.D.  were to find a sponsor  she  would be able to seek an abortion under  his  or  her  care and the complaint against the government would dissolve. But as the ACLU observed  âthe notion that an appropriate sponsor for  J.D.  could be identified  properly vetted  and approved in an eleven day time frame is entirely unrealisticâ. Second  the DoJ argued that  J.D.  brought  her  predicament on  herself . âAny alleged âobstacleâ to Ms Doeâs ability to obtain an abortion is by her own choiceâ  the brief asserts. She chose to flee oppression in her home country and enter America illegally  so she is author of her own dilemma. The obstacle to her abortion is self-imposed.  J.D.  can decide to remove that obstacle âat any time by filing a request for voluntary departureâ.
This is a glaring insult to the young woman. Start with the implication that  J.D.  would enjoy the autonomy to have an abortion if only she were to give up on America and return to her home country: a choice between forced motherhood and a bus-ride back to the place she took great pains to escape. Actually  it is worse: in Mexico  where  J.D.  seems to be from (this information is sealed)  she would not be able to secure a legal abortion at all. Self-deportation  then  would almost certainly be a lose-lose scenario.
The most jarring feature of the governmentâs argument comes near the end of its brief when it advances a novel theory of government âcomplicityâ in acts it finds reprehensible. Why does the Office of Refugee Resettlement refuse to release  J.D.  to court-appointed representatives to travel to a nearby abortion clinic? Because that would âentail facilitating an abortionâ  the DoJ brief reads. Even if HHS does not drive  J.D.  to the clinic or pay for the procedure  approving such a release âwould still require that HHS or its contractor devote time and staff towards maintaining appropriate custody over Ms Doe during her absenceâ and necessitate âexpend[ing] resources to monitorâ her health. Permitting  J.D.  to exercise her constitutional right to end her pregnancy would ârequire the federal government to be complicit in her abortion  which the government has a significant and legitimate interest in refusing to doâ.

SOLUTION:
A 17