Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.

Finally.  Equitable moderation via artificial intelligence.  No more bullying by the Eugene Progressive majority.  I like it already and look forward to friendly discussions.
No

By Alaska should pay what you mean mean is WE should pay since Alaska has no money except what it steals from the people.   "Alaska" should provide a nice insurance package  and nothing else.  Why do government employees always deserve more us private workers.  More days off, more sick time., more raises, more insurance, more retirement.  It's a bunch of hooey.  Time to rein in the pay and benefits.
Yes

Actual reality politics in this country aside (i.e "It's never going to happen"), the Parliamentary systems of Britain, Israel, Japan, Germany etc. where multiple political parties exist and can have an actual 'piece of the action' to the extent of sometimes getting to be in charge of a portion of the actual Governmental Administration or at least real input on some pending legislation or governmental policies is at least superficially attractive.  

The ability to hang up everything to get your own way by one or more minorities is both the strength and the weakness of those systems, however. 

 Just as the 2/3 Senate super-majority requirement for some things is for our system.

No