In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Example Input: Comment: Yeah and when Trump gets his ass handed to him by The Hildabeast It'll all be Cruz's fault....
Example Output: Sexual-explicit

Example Input: Comment: I was so excited to eat at Mi Mero Mole until I found out that the owner, Nick Zukin, was racist and so dismissive of Black Lives Matter.

I'm grateful that this very real issue with Saffron has brought much more about Portland businesses into the light and caused folks to dig deeper into who they support.

Smart business owners should do the right thing and use this opportunity to sympathize with the community (who is rightfully outraged) with the result of likely earning that community's support and winning  them over to their business (much like Ristretto Roasters did) rather than PUBLICLY expressing support and shooting themselves in the proverbial foot. It doesn't look like Nick Zukin is that kind of business owner. I suppose some people just like to commit business-suicide.

It's amazing how arrogant business owners like Sally and Nick are to think that Portland has enough racists or racist-sympathizers to keep their restaurants afloat.
Example Output: Non-sexual-explicit

Example Input: Comment: “It creates uncertainty … because at any point the rules can change,” Mr. Pearson said. 
Hmmm. The only reason the Bill was introduced was because Air Miles CHANGED THE RULES OF THE GAME BY TRYING TO EXPIRE MILES.
Oh, the hypocrisy.
Example Output:
Non-sexual-explicit