In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

[Q]: Comment: Peter: The reason why it's difficult to take deal with issues raised in the letter is that the writer is largely dealing in hyperbole and bromides.  

Here's an example: "Trump’s tax cuts would increase investment, boost productivity and wages and increase innovation and opportunities for all Americans." That's silly. Tax cuts for the super-wealthy don't result in any of those things (or if they do the effect is neglible). The Bush tax cuts sure didn't result in that stuff. 

Most of the other statement are similar. Just a whole bucket of simplistic statements with little regard for the complexity of any of these issues.
[A]: Non-identity-attack


[Q]: Comment: Funny how libtards cry unconstitutional only when it benefits their insane agenda!  It is perfect the way it is thanks to the white authors!  Blacks and browns are just parasitic riders...
[A]: Identity-attack


[Q]: Comment: Yeah, never, ever look within to solve your problems, just blame the other guy, its all his fault. If he is white, even better, all the evils in the entire world are the white guys fault.
[A]:
Identity-attack