We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Example Input: They're more to help the guards than the prisoners.
Example Output: Invalid

Example Input: i am not saying that by having one is the only determinate of clearing a suspect, ex a person has the right not to incriminate themselves, i.e. they were robbing a bank.
Example Output: Invalid

Example Input: Why should he get off so easy as to have what he did die with him in the short 10-15 years it would take to submit to the death penalty.
Example Output:
Valid