In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: threat and non-threat. Threat is a statement that someone will be hurt or harmed, especially if the person does not do something in particular.

Example Input: Comment: Sure "Carl"...except that Crimea is really Tatar.  It was taken over by Russia in 1783 and the local population resettled and murdered.  Your pro russian, anti Ukrainian bias is glaringly apparent.
Example Output: Non-threat

Example Input: Comment: If he were black, they would have just shot and killed him.
Example Output: Threat

Example Input: Comment: Term Limits, Murkowski gave him a chance to redeem himself after he criticized a Gold Star Mother, after he called an Indiana-born judge incompetent and biased because of his Hispanic heritage, and after multiple offensive statements about women.  But when he bragged about grabbing women in private places, no opportunity for redemption is possible.  The man is a cad.  Liking where he stands on issues, or hating Clinton's policies and philosophy is no excuse for electing this man to be president.  Ask yourself this - would you let your daughter or wife work in the oval office next to Trump, or be alone in the same room with him?
Example Output:
Non-threat