In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

Example Input: Sentence: Mary tucked her daughter Anne into bed, so that she could sleep.
 Reason: The 'she' refers to mary's daughter because anne was tucked by her mother so that anne slept. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Example Output: Correct

Example Input: Sentence: Fred covered his eyes with his hands, because the wind was blowing sand around. He opened them when the wind stopped.
 Reason: The 'them' refers to his eyes because wind was blowing sand around covered his eyes. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Example Output: Wrong

Example Input: Sentence: Joe has sold his house and bought a new one a few miles away. He will be moving into it on Thursday.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the new house because he is moving out of "it", not in. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Example Output:
Wrong