In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

[EX Q]: Comment: "Before you people showed up we used to kill each other for fun" - a very wise friend of mine from Kotzebue, roots in Selawik.
[EX A]: Non-obscene

[EX Q]: Comment: DOJ should open an investigation into James Comey misconduct while FBI Director. That would put his incompetence and self serving bias out there and help get the public behind his firing. House of Reps will not vote for impeachment if it hurts the re-election campaigns of the members.
[EX A]: Non-obscene

[EX Q]: Comment: How about a damn plan for moving forward?  The Rs had a winning message with saying they weren't Obama, coupled with claiming they had plans.  Yes, those claims were lies, but they had a 2 part message.  The Ds seem to be stuck on only 1 message, that message is that they aren't Rs or Trump.  The Ds need to be able to articulate what they want to do, you get that since 2010, they have lost most of the state governorships, legislatures and basically the entire federal government, right?  Yes, they have made a few gains here or there, but not enough to make any difference.
[EX A]:
Obscene