In this task, you will be presented with a passage, and you need to write an **implausible** answer to to fill in the place of "_". Your answer should be incorrect, but should not be out of context. Try using words that are related to the context of the passage, but are not the correct answer.  Even though there exist multiple wrong answers, we only need a single wrong answer.
--------
Question: (CNN) Despite Democrats' objections, and despite their 39-hour filibuster, the Missouri Senate on Wednesday morning passed a measure its supporters characterize as a religious freedom bill that could change the state's constitution. Republicans in the chamber used a procedure to end debate on the legislation and pass Senate Joint Resolution 39, an action that Democrats said broke Senate rules. If it someday becomes law, Missouri's Constitution would be amended to include language about the "protection of certain religious organizations and individuals from being penalized by the state because of their sincere religious beliefs or practices concerning marriage between two persons of the same sex."Republicans use a procedure to force a vote, end a 39-hour filibuster; Democrats objectThe bill goes to the House of Representatives; citizens could have the final say in a statewide vote 
 Question:That's because, just like in _'s Senate, there are well more than double the number of Republicans as Democrats in the legislation's next stop -- the state House of Representatives.

Answer: CNN


Question: NEW DELHI, India (CNN) -- Flight attendant Sheela Joshi is 5 feet, 4 inches and 148 pounds. Air India has strict weight parameters that all attendants must meet. When they don't, the airline grounds them. Her employer, Air India, says she is too fat to fly. Joshi, 50, has been an air hostess -- as they are still called in India -- for the national airline for 26 years. But she's been grounded because the airline has done away with its wiggle room on weight. Until two years ago, Air India allowed an attendant's weight to vary within 6.6 pounds (3 kilograms) of a specified limit. It has since put in place strict weight parameters that all attendants must meet. When they don't, the airline grounds them without pay until they shed the excess pounds.Until two years ago, Air India allowed an attendant's weight to vary within 6.6 poundsWeight-discrimination lawsuits forced U.S. carriers to do away with weight limitsIn India, the attendants are not deemed medically unfit -- just over the weight limit 
 Question:_ fought back, saying the employees knew the job requirements when they signed up and didn't express concern.

Answer: NEW DELHI


Question: Kevin Sinfield has leapt to the defence of Sam Burgess and criticised former rugby union players for having 'a cheap shot' at his old team-mate. Burgess was heavily criticised following England's pool-stage exit at the Rugby World Cup and is thought to be considering his future in the 15-man code. He made replacement appearances against Fiji and Australia and one start in the loss to Wales, which led to a brutal assessment from ex-Ireland centre Gordon D'Arcy, who claimed Burgess' 'naivety embarrassed those around him'. Bath head coach Mike Ford revealed Burgess 'didn't quite feel right' upon his return to club duty and was subsequently given time off, fuelling speculation that he was set to leave union just 12 months into his three-year contract at the Recreation Ground.Kevin Sinfield is a week into his own transition from rugby league to unionHe was Sam Burgess's England league captain and hit out at his criticsBurgess has been lambasted by ex-players after England's World Cup flopThe centre or flanker has been linked to a return to rugby leagueSinfield said some in union don't realise what they've got in Burgess 
 Question:'The big disappointment for a lot of people who know _ is the number of ex-players - who don't know him and understand enough about Sam - that have come out and had a bit of a cheap shot towards him.

Answer:
Kevin Sinfield