In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Example Input: Comment: We have Trump on audio/video tape bragging on "how he does it to women."  "When I see a beautiful woman, I can't wait."  I'm a star and I can do anything.  Women like it."  "I grab them by the p___y."  Pop in more tic tacs.
Example Output: Sexual-explicit

Example Input: Comment: During the day I believe he went to prospective houses where he hoped to harm individuals, knocking on doors during the day where he asked for work.  He is an admitted liar.  He is manipulative producing his penciled writing.  It may be the cover story.  He is definitely a thug perhaps for political purposes.  He may not be who he presents himself at all.  He may just be an operative of some type perhaps a paid assassin.  How would you like him showing up at your door with your family there - while you are at work.  He may have.  Not buying his penciled story.  He is an admitted liar among other qualities.  He no doubt has his admirers and cohorts in various interests.  The one's he and his associates have not "mentioned".  Gullible reporting?  What's his military record?  I don't believe his story.  He is a bad character for sure.
Example Output: Non-sexual-explicit

Example Input: Comment: Sex sells, even in the digital age. Gotta get clicks.
Example Output:
Sexual-explicit