The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.

Input: Consider Input: Context: 'I know how that goes...We are planning on hiking too and we could also use some extra food.' 'well I am sure between you and me we will find a way....' 'I really need some food, but I could also use extra firewood. It is supposed to be pretty cold at night and we would love to cook up some smores.'
Utterance: 'I hear you we have the same issues well you can have either 2 food or 2 firewood what would you prefer?'

Output: Yes


Input: Consider Input: Context: 'I need firewood, because I have a medical condition that causes my veins to close if I get too cold at night. I don't mind sharing the water.' 'I could give you 1 firewood, 2 waters, and 1 food. ' 'If you make it two food, we have a deal.'
Utterance: 'I would rather let you have the third water than other food. I don't like fish. ☹️'

Output: No


Input: Consider Input: Context: 'I need the water to drink - I don't trust the water I might find at the campsite.' 'Did you bring any water to start?' 'Yes! Did you bring any food to start?'
Utterance: 'I did, but my friend only feels comfortable with extra around, God forbid, if something happens this could save his life. So I'm thinking, I take all three food packages, two firewood packages and leave all three water and one firewood for you. '


Output: Yes