In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence can be inferred from the statement. Incorrect choices change the meaning in important ways or have details that are not mentioned in the statement. Indicate your answer as 1,2, or 3 corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.

Example Input: Statement: A key distinction between recreational and residential benefits is that only those people living in residential areas are assumed to receive benefits from residential visibility, while all households in the U.S. are assumed to derive some benefit from improvements in Class I areas. Choices:  1. Only people in residential areas are supposed to receive residential benefits. 2. Only people in residential areas are supposed to receive residential benefits, but many get around this. 3. Anyone may receive residential benefits.
Example Output: 1

Example Input: Statement: Households' wealth-income ratio dropped from its 1999 peak. Choices:  1. Househould wealth-income increased since 1999. 2. Wealth-income ratio fell from what it was in 1999. 3. Income from the middle class have suffered greatly more than the other classes.
Example Output: 2

Example Input: Statement: But doesn't the happy combination of low unemployment and low inflation show the payoff from hidden productivity growth? Choices:  1. Low unemployment was the hallmark of the president's plan.   2. I am not asking about the combination of low unemployment and low inflation.   3. Does the combination of low unemployment and low inflation show a payoff from productivity growth?
Example Output:
3