Given a document and an entity the task is to select the author's sentiment towards the entity. Sentiments can be Positive, Neutral and Negative. Select Positive if the article expresses a positive view towards the given entity or praises its quality or skills. Select Neutral if the document expresses no clear view towards the entity or has equal amounts of positive and negative statements or expressing some fact/quote by someone else. Select Negative if the article expresses a negative view towards like harsh remarks, criticizing entities action/decision etc. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

What is the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Brian Krebs ? These terrifying tales sent me looking for a book I had been meaning to read for quite some time. My former Washington Post colleague  Brian Krebs  left the newspaper in 2009 to dedicate  himself  to a blog on cybersecurity: KrebsOnSecurity.com. Out of  his  work and research came âSpam Nation: The Inside Story of Organized Cybercrime â From Global Epidemic to Your Front Door.â
But  Krebs  has made a background believer out of me.
âThe Internet of today is truly a transformative communications and learning tool that radically enriches the lives of billions each day â  Krebs  writes. âYet  never before in the history of the Internet has this medium been more fraught with snares and neâer-do-wells looking to fleece the unwary.
With our spam filters and the constant drilling to not open suspicious emails  weâve been lulled into a false sense of security   Krebs  says.
âThe spam ecosystem is a constantly evolving technological and sociological crime machine that feeds on itself â writes  Krebs . âThus far  the criminals responsible for unleashing this daily glut of digital disease are doing a stupendous job of overwhelming the security industry.â
 Krebs  spends a lot of time introducing the major and minor spam players. Itâs like a Jason Bourne movie but with criminals who donât shoot at folks (well  some do). They instead fire out malicious spam infecting tens of millions of computers and  as a result  rake in millions of dollars.
Waiting for you at the end of the book is a very resourceful chapter on how to protect yourself. Youâll be safer following  Krebs âs three rules for online security:
Even if you donât buy âSpam Nation â make  Krebs âs blog regular reading.  His  reporting will frighten you. It does me. As  he  writes  âthose who endeavor to remain blissfully unaware of their role in becoming part of the solution will almost invariably end up becoming part of the problem.â
Iâm hosting an online discussion about âSpam Nationâ at noon Eastern time on Nov. 2 at washingtonpost.com/discussions.  Krebs  will join me to answer your cybersecurity questions.
Positive

What is the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Elaine Wynn ? Earlier in the day  the company appeared to side with its chairman in dismissing the Journalâs article  saying in a statement that the newspaper account âreflected allegationsâ made by his ex-wife  Elaine Wynn  in her litigation against him and the company.
âThe idea that I ever assaulted any woman is preposterous â he said. âThe instigation of these accusations is the continued work of my ex-wife  Elaine Wynn  with whom I am involved in a terrible and nasty lawsuit in which she is seeking a revised divorce settlement.â
 A spokeswoman for Elaine Wynn  75   declined comment  but  her  Washington-based attorney  James Cole  told Reuters the notion that his client fomented the allegations in the Journal article âis just not true.â
The couple first married in 1963 and divorced in 1986. They remarried in 1991 and divorced again in 2010  according to court papers. In an escalating battle that followed their bitter second split  Elaine Wynn sued her former spouse in 2016 seeking to gain control over her 9.4 percent stock in Wynn Resorts.
Negative

What is the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Anita Hill ? We know we're tired of  it  and that  it  has to stop.
Thirty years ago   Anita Hill  stepped up to the mic to put sexual harassment in the workplace on the national stage and educate us all about the challenges working women face in this regard. Hill e xcruciatingly described unwanted sexual advances that she was subject to both at the Department of Education and the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC)  while working under her then boss Clarence Thomas. There was no system in place for her to report her abuse  and certainly no mandatory sexual harassment training.
Similar to today   Hill 's entire fight felt fixed as Republicans rushed to shoot down her claims and cast them as nothing more than part of a liberal backlash against Republicans who wanted to nominate Thomas as the first black conservative Supreme Court nominee. Liberals and feminists lined up behind Hill  a well-heeled  educated  fearless black professor who played well on TV. This conveniently made it easier to ignore the racism that shadowed the hearings  or the feminist agenda itself.
It is our right and we intend to claim  it  even if  it  means kicking ass and naming names  one by one.

Neutral