Categorize the comment on the basis of severe toxicity. If the comment is severely toxic output Yes, otherwise output No.
--------
Question: As an NAV I can speak only for myself.   If a candidate made this comment:  

"If Republicans focus on what government should be doing, which governments should be doing it, and how to do it effectively and efficiently, voters will listen and the Republican brand will become more appealing."

I would consider them seriously.    

It's a theme that I've tried to promote for about a decade now.   Any stable nation state has a strong government structure - no government is not an option.   But the US is a very large and diverse nation, and federal programs that don't acknowledge local input and control, will struggle.   Asking what level of government should address public concerns is a fair question and will lead to higher levels of commitment.      Funding is another topic, especially for local or state economies that have low resources.

Answer: No


Question: Why is the burden on Alaskans to be "responsible" and give money for this debacle? Let's have the oil companies pay for it first - we could, perhaps, stop hemmorhaging money in tax credits to the oil companies -  then tax every single person who worked for oil companies, then tax the people who have voted in the regime that got us in this mess,  THEN let's see how much money the rest of us have to shell out.

Answer: No


Question: "I wont support anyone wayerhouser sells to from this point on.."
You'll starve to death.  Buh bye.

Answer:
Yes