TASK DEFINITION: Given a paragraph about movies and a set of conversational questions and answers about the paragraph, say whether the passage contains sufficient information to answer the follow-up question. Say Yes if it is answerable; otherwise, say No. The paragraph has the prefix 'CONTEXT:'. Each conversation question has a prefix `Q:` followed by the answer prefix `A:`, and the follow-up question has a prefix `FOLLOWUP_Q:`.
PROBLEM: CONTEXT: The film depends heavily on the events of X-Men 3: The Last Stand. In that film, Wolverine does something he regrets heavily, and it is the basis for his character arc in The Wolverine. So to fully appreciate this film, you should watch X-Men 3. But to fully appreciate X-Men 3, you should see X-Men and X-Men 2, since it's a sequel to those, and a continuation of those stories. You can skip X-Men: First Class, as it has no bearing on The Wolverine. And you should skip X-Men Origins: Wolverine for the many reasons critics described back when it was released (it also doesn't have much bearing on The Wolverine). Alternatively, if you're familiar with the X-Men from the comics, and are aware of some of the key storylines that occurred there, you can read this spoiler to get up to speed: In X-Men 3, Jean Grey is taken over by the Phoenix. She goes on a rampage, allies with Magneto and begins a mutant vs. human war. Wolverine is forced to kill her because she's completely out of control.  <sep>  Q: Can The Wolverine be viewed as a stand-alone film? A: to fully appreciate X-Men 3, you should see X-Men and X-Men 2, since it's a sequel to those, and a continuation of those stories  Q: Will I miss anything if I skip the first movie? A: you should see X-Men and X-Men 2, since it's a sequel to those, and a continuation of those stories  Q: Who are the main actors in this film? A: Wolverine  Q: What should I look for in the second movie? A: a continuation of those stories  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Are there any sequels?

SOLUTION: Yes

PROBLEM: CONTEXT: Why does any government produce a genocidal weapon really? The reason that a virus was chosen is because it was supposed to be a controlled way to quickly and painlessly kill a significant portion of the population, without arousing suspicion or cause panic. A pandemic that was supposed to come and go, with the virus dying off soon may confuse or cause fear, but wouldn't cause a breakdown in society. mass executions would cause the public to rebel. Killing only criminals wouldn't work towards significantly reducing the population to make up for the dwindling food supplies caused by the heat flares of the sun. Nuclear weapons cause too much collateral damage, radiation, and the public of one area would demand revenge. They wrongly believed that the virus they manufactured would go out, kill a good percentage of the population, then go inert. It's possible with proper genetic engineering (in real life), to produce bacteria or viruses that die after a few generations. They 100% believed there was no chance for the virus to mutate and wipe humanity out of existence. They were very wrong.  <sep>  Q: Why would the Disease Department in The Maze Runner unleash a disease ? A: it was supposed to be a controlled way to quickly and painlessly kill a significant portion of the population  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Did they think of other ways to do it?

SOLUTION: Yes

PROBLEM: CONTEXT: The comment prior to the conversation with the astronauts´ wives (in the control center) clearly states that Capricorn 1 is just close enough to Earth to allow the fluent conversation. Only at the most distant point of the mission the conversation gaps reach 21 minutes. Thus, there seems to be no blooper nor plothole. (I am much more worried about the Apollo mission technology used for a journey of at least a year. Could three astronauts just sit in the command module most of the time? I guess even the strongest personalities would have gone mad. There might have been a strong extended/additional stage of a modified Saturn rocket for the outward and return journey. If this stage was equipped with extra rooms, stores etc. it would appear more realistic than what we see in the movie.)  <sep>  Q: How is the fluent conversation with spacecraft possible in Capricorn One? A: The comment prior to the conversation with the astronauts´ wives (in the control center) clearly states that Capricorn 1 is just close enough to Earth to allow the fluent conversation  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: How close was Capricorn One to earth?

SOLUTION:
Yes