The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the self-need strategy, otherwise output No. self-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to create a personal need for an item in the negotiation, such as by pointing out that the participant sweats a lot to show preference towards water packages.

[EX Q]: Context: 'I need 3 food packages as it is required to feed children who visited unexpectedly. Instead you can take water and firewood' 'No that doesn't work for me. I also have children with me. 4 children in total.  how about i take 2 food packages and 2 water packages and you take 1 food 1 water and 3 firewood packages.' 'I too have the same issue. I am also asking for children only , better you could accept 1 food , 2 water and 3 firewood, I hope this deal will work out for you'
Utterance: 'I need at least 2 food packages and at least 1 water. I can live with out any extra firewood.'
[EX A]: No

[EX Q]: Context: 'yay, thank you so much! to very I am getting 3 waters, 0 firewood, and 1 food?' 'i will be getting 3 firewood, 0 water and 2 food' 'perfect! submitting deal, thank you so much for understanding'
Utterance: 'i am glad we were able to reach an agreement'
[EX A]: No

[EX Q]: Context: 'I agree! Nice to meet you... I have two boys who always eat! Any chance I canget 2 food?' 'Food is the item of greatest value to you?' 'It is! What do you think?'
Utterance: 'The item of greatest value to me is WATER. Before thinking about an offer I need to know what your priorities are and you need to know mine in order to conclude something fair for both of you.'
[EX A]:
Yes