In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: threat and non-threat. Threat is a statement that someone will be hurt or harmed, especially if the person does not do something in particular.

[EX Q]: Comment: Hahahaha. Now tell us PC spokesperson pretty please, did Ms. Ambrose make the calls to the ethics people after Trudeau's vacation event became public and and turned into a cheap political play? She would have to be awfully dumb if she did not. In addition to the hypocrisy the layer of parsing non existent differences is boggling.
[EX A]: Non-threat

[EX Q]: Comment: P2: Well, she turned me into a newt!
V: A newt?!
P2: I got better.
P3: Burn her anyway! (burn her burn her burn!)
[EX A]: Threat

[EX Q]: Comment: What the Liberals are telling the Americans is that you need to be as liberal as us, before we trade with you. That is a total non-starter, just as it would be if the Americans demanded we end universal health-care, because it puts their businesses at a disadvantage.

I can understand taking a tough negotiating position on some matters, at least to start with. But to stake our economic future on issues that they know will never fly, no matter what, is the height of incompetence. So far, at least, Justin is actually making Trump look good.
[EX A]:
Non-threat