We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

Ex Input:
The criminals already have plenty of guns, that means that ending gun ownership will play no real part in ending gun possession by criminals.

Ex Output:
Valid


Ex Input:
A firearm in mearley an inanimate piece of steel that has no mind of its own and cant function without the intervention of human control over it.

Ex Output:
Valid


Ex Input:
No it's federal law that you have to run background checks in order to keep your FFL (federal firearms license) which allows you to legally sell guns.

Ex Output:

Valid