We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Ex Input:
Sent1: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time.
 Sent2: Back to reality, we convict the wrong person all the time, and we've set up a system where death penalty is actually more expensive than life in prison.

Ex Output:
Similar


Ex Input:
Sent1: People use the argument that we should not execute people based on the possibility that they may be innocent, but they could care less if we lock someone up for life who may be innocent.
 Sent2: People have, and will, be executed even though they are innocent of the crime.

Ex Output:
Not similar


Ex Input:
Sent1: Also, within the USA, murder rates are consistently lower in states that don't have capital punishment.
 Sent2: Moreover, states without the death penalty have much lower murder rates.

Ex Output:

Similar