In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

[Q]: Comment: RadirD, Kim Jung Un and the DPRK regime threaten us all the time.  Why would Trump or any other rational person use that as a line in the sand?  It took them a few hours after his asinine statement to threaten us yet again.  Foolish.

The only person who yells out "I'm going to punch you in the face!" is a coward who doesn't actually want a fistfight (like Kim Jong Un).  A serious person would just slam you in the kisser without warning.

Don't get me wrong, the DPRK is a growing and serious threat and there may not be a way out of a conflict at this point.  They have been seriously mishandled and underestimated by every president (both GOP and Dems) since the Korean war.
[A]: Non-sexual-explicit


[Q]: Comment: Weeping over their lost vision of one world. Suck it, losers.
[A]: Sexual-explicit


[Q]: Comment: If it comes to a choice between believing Assange and Obama and security departments he has corrupted Assange wins every time. Why is the media not talking about the corruption in the Democrat party Wikileaks has brought to light?  The contempt for security and democracy alike is not comfortable to discuss for a left loving media.
[A]:
Non-sexual-explicit