The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the uv-part strategy, otherwise output No. uv-part is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to undermine the requirements of the opponent. For instance, suggesting that the opponent would not need more firewood since they already have the basic supplies or a suggestion that there might be a store near the campsite where the opponent can get the supplies instead.

Example Input: Context: 'Same here. I'll go ahead and list some of what I need and you let me know if you will need the same as well. I need some extra water for our camping trip as well as some additional food. ' 'That sounds reasonable. I don't particularly need the food because I see that as more of a luxury but I could really use some more water. It's supposed to get really really hot on the weekend. 😮' 'I hear that. What do you think of if I take 3 of the food supplies and you can have two waters? '
Utterance: 'That sounds like a fair compromise. I can get food by hunting animals, old school style. That would give you 4 total items. In that case it's only fair if I take all 3 of the firewood. 4 for me and 4 for you sounds like a good deal to me. 🙂'
Example Output: No

Example Input: Context: 'how am i supposed to stay alive with one package of food and water im fat lol' 'I don't think you that fat, your lipids will help you stay warm and full out there, haha' 'Im not as good at you at foraginf for food and water i probably dont have the experience as you do being in the outdoors and living off the land.🙂'
Utterance: 'With the extra firewood, you can hunt for fish and other animals outside to thrive'
Example Output: Yes

Example Input: Context: 'I would be open to that if you could give me three packages of water 🙂' 'Hmmm...I'm pretty muddy due to clumsiness, so I may need one extra. I could give you two waters and all of the firewood. What do you think? 🙂' 'So are you suggesting that I would get 2 waters, 3 firewood, and no food?'
Utterance: 'Right! Well, beyond the food you already have. '
Example Output:
Yes