In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

[EX Q]: Comment: Trid sees nothing wrong with "No Dogs or Jews", "We don't serve Muslims" and so on. He supports bigotry. And no, that is NOT a straw man, but the clear and obvious implication of your " If either the buyer or the seller does not want to enter into that contract for whatever reason then I believe they have the right to refuse." Thank you for proving that your claim to being a Christian is a complete sham.
[EX A]: Non-sexual-explicit

[EX Q]: Comment: I did not say anything about Adams, I simply asked you a question. You are a waste of ink space fish...you are too inconsistent.
[EX A]: Non-sexual-explicit

[EX Q]: Comment: Their is no middle ground where the flag can be respected and civil rights can also be respected?"

It's my way or Hitler's?

That is a true zealot's position.
[EX A]:
Non-sexual-explicit