Given a document, generate a short title of the document. The title should convey the main idea/event/topic about which the document is being written. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

Input: Consider Input: Brandon Judd  president of the labor union  said  Agent Rogelio Martinez  died Sunday of blunt force trauma to the head.
Federal authorities have not yet said how  Martinez  was killed.
Authorities have been searching for witnesses and potential suspects after  Martinez  was killed and a fellow agent was seriously injured. Officials with U.S. Customs and Border Protection and the Border Patrol said in a statement that the pair were âresponding to activityâ near Interstate 10 in Van Horn  Tex.  when they were harmed. The other agent called for help  and other agents provided medical care and took them to a hospital.
Following news that an agent had been killed  President Trump appeared to connect  Martinez âs death to border security and plugged his plans for a border wall on Twitter on Sunday night.
Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Tex.) said on Twitter  without any further explanation  that  Martinez  and the other agent were âattackedâ and he also linked the incident to security on the border with Mexico.
Agent Rogelio Martinez  your service and sacrifice will never be forgotten. Our hearts go out to your family. pic.twitter.com/WVuW8C2N8n â USBPChief (@USBPChief) November 20  2017
Isaac Morales  who was stabbed in a bar parking lot in El Paso  was the only agent besides  Martinez  to die in 2017. Three agents died in 2016; two of them in car accidents  one of a heart attack while on bike patrol.

Output: Slain border agent may have been beaten to death by rocks in âgrisly scene â union leader says


Input: Consider Input: Earlier this morning  radio newscaster Leeann Tweeden revealed that  Sen. Al Franken  had behaved inappropriately toward  her  during a USO tour of the Middle East in 2006. During a rehearsal for a skit that included a kiss   she  says   he  stuck  his  tongue in  her  mouth  and then took this picture on the way home:
 Franken  immediately acknowledged what had happened and apologized. This prompted the now drearily familiar round of pronouncements that  he  hadnât apologized enough. âNo matter what your political affiliation â wrote Chris Cillizza at CNN  âyou have to see how inadequate Frankenâs first apology is.â So  Franken  apologized again. Oddly  Tweeden herself thought  his  apology had been just fine. Both of them:
.@jaketapper: âDo you accept  his  apology?â @LeeannTweeden: âI doâ¦the one that came out this morning  I accepted that one tooâ¦I believe  him . I think it is heartfelt.â â Saba (@saba_h) November 16  2017
No matter. Ed Kilgore thinks  Franken  is toast:
 Franken  is almost certainly going down  and the only question is whether  he  can somehow tough it out until the end of  his  current term in 2020. The odds are very low that  he  can  particularly since  his  entire career in politics and comedy is now going to come under fresh scrutiny for misogyny and/or hypocrisy.
By contrast   Franken  thought  he  was joking around but went farther than  he  should have. Once.Â¹ Itâs no whitewash to say that this is a considerably lesser offense. But if the only response we have to any kind of sexual abuse is to insist on resignation from office and expulsion from public lifeâmostly to protect our own reputationsâwe are not acting with any sense of proportionality. We need to start. Listen to Leeann Tweeden  folks.
Do you think  Al Franken  should step down or be expelled from the Senate? Leeann Tweeden: Iâm not asking for that [Link] pic.twitter.com/Nx0xcZkUyz â The Lead CNN (@TheLeadCNN) November 16  2017

Output: Should Al Franken Resign? â Mother Jones


Input: Consider Input: âIt doesnât even look like  her .â
That one comment  culled from thousands online about  Baltimore artist Amy Sheraldâs portrait of Michelle Obama  unveiled today at the Smithsonian Instituteâs National Portrait Gallery  sums up a familiar response to the publicâs often less-than flattering responses to portrait painting.
In  the portrait    Mrs. Obama  sits in a custom dress designed by Millyâs Michelle Smith of bold geometric shapes   her  expression challenging the viewer.  Her  face and skin are grey  as Sherald often paints  her  subjects.
It doesnât look exactly like  her   it doesnât look exactly not like  her . It is a representation of Mrs. Obama  who sat for Sherald the artist  and the responses to the result sum up the tension between artist and sitter and artist and spectator  too.
Holland Cotter  art critic for the New York Times  said  Mrs. Obama âs portrait face was too far removed from the real one.
This gets at the central tension of the art of the portrait. Just how much should a portrait be about physical likeness  versus conveying psychological truth  or an insight into character? The furor over  Michelle Obamaâs  portrait suggests we want a portrait to deliver the first above all else.
What peopleâs kvetching comes down to: this painting isnât enough like a photograph. The spirit that  Mrs. Obama  represented to so many seems lacking in the more restrained  removed spirit of Sheraldâs work. But the public face of  Michelle Obama  isn't the only face. Sherald is arguably trying to show us another face.
In this sense  Kehinde Wileyâs accompanying portrait of  Barack Obama  is seen as more successful. It looks more like the photographic  Barack Obama  we know. Here  any outrage voiced seems to have been about the background  which features flowers from three significant places to  him : Kenya  Hawaii and Chicago.
"I tried to negotiate less gray hair and Kehinde's artistic integrity would not allow ( him ) to do what I asked "  Obama  said. "I tried to negotiate smaller ears. Struck out on that as well."
Both painters aimed to do something beyond simple replication for their portraits. The backdrop of a bush  or garden  endows  Barack Obama  with a literal life force. The garden is green and vibrant behind  him . The setting is entirely complimentary to  his  persona; in the painting  he  is sitting forward  alert.  He  is fixing us with a wizened glare. This garden is pure Obama Zen.
 Mrs. Obama âs portrait is starker  and psychologically richer. "Amy  I want to thank you for so spectacularly capturing the grace and beauty and intelligence and charm and hotness of the woman I love " Mr. Obama said.
 Mrs. Obama  said  she  hoped "girls and girls of color" would âsee an image of someone who looks like them hanging on the walls of this great American institution ... And I know the kind of impact that will have on their lives because I was one of those girls.â
In  her  remarks   Mrs. Obama  acknowledges what  her  portraitâs detractors do not; that a painting such as this is a distillation rather than impersonation. It is the personâs spirit in the moment of sitting  rather than a literal embodiment of that person.
If you really feel that Michelle Obamaâs portrait is a dud  the queen got it far worse in George Condoâs portrait of her  envisioning her with a huge neck and bulbous cheeks and chin. A Cabbage Patch Doll  scoffed the critics.
You may not think  Michelle Obama  looks much like  herself  in this new portrait   she  may not be the public  Michelle Obama  you have seen and responded to  but at least  she  doesnât look like someone or something else entirely.


Output: Michelle Obama âs Portrait Isnât a Photograph. Get Over It