In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

[Q]: Comment: Bullshite, I'm beyond getting fed up with the bullshite stance you've taken on Rural Alaska.....
[A]: Obscene


[Q]: Comment: maybe go back to prison chicken shit. let's meet, I'll come over to your house and I want you to tell me to my face. I would watch what you say about service members, chicken.
[A]: Obscene


[Q]: Comment: LOL.  I was talking about the bakers.  Sweet Cakes for Melissa was in Portland Oregon.  They want to lecture gay couples about how they are going to Hell but they do not want to suffer the economic consequences for their beliefs, aka that liberal Portland residents might not want to frequent a store owned by homophobes.  No one says that Mary has purchase the cake for her daughter's birthday or her wedding cake at a specific baker and Mary can take into account how they treat her gay friends.  Gay couples who were denied a service by a bakery have every right to complain about how they were treated and write bad reviews.  Even people not directly affected can complain in support of them.  It is called capitalism.  I thought that conservatives liked capitalism.
[A]:
Non-obscene