In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

Ex Input:
Sentence: The table won't fit through the doorway because it is too narrow.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the doorway because the table is likely to be placed at a height where it will be blocking the doorway. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

Ex Output:
Wrong


Ex Input:
Sentence: Sid explained his theory to Mark but he couldn't understand him.
 Reason: The 'he' refers to mark because Sid was able to communicate with him. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

Ex Output:
Wrong


Ex Input:
Sentence: Alice tried frantically to stop her daughter from chatting at the party, leaving us to wonder why she was behaving so strangely.
 Reason: The 'she' refers to alice because Her daughter barking would be considered as strange. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

Ex Output:

Wrong