The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the no-need strategy, otherwise output No. no-need is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used when a participant points out that they do not need an item based on personal context such as suggesting that they have ample water to spare. no-need can directly benefit the opponent since it implies that the item is up for grabs.
--------
Question: Context: 'one food is not enough i am pregnant and i need to eat many meals' 'My friend is ill and needs to eat to survive. How about I take 3 water then and you can have 2 food and all of the wood?' 'sounds reasonable'
Utterance: 'Great! glad we could come to an agreement. May I ask why you are camping while pregnant?'

Answer: No


Question: Context: 
Utterance: 'I want to make sure I'm well prepared for camping. How would you feel if I took 2 water, 1 firewood, and 2 food?'

Answer: No


Question: Context: 'Well, we have extra food too. How about I take 2 water, 1 food, and give the res (1 water, 2 food, 3 firewood) to you?' 'That's super thoughtful of you. However, I really need two waters so I can provide for everyone. Once we have enough food and fire we can always go get water from the stream and boil it for the kids.' 'Of course there is no garuntee you will catch anything, if you want 2 waters I'd prefer to take all the food just in case'
Utterance: 'I would certainly give you all of the food if I could have 2 waters and 1 firewood.'

Answer:
No