In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

[EX Q]: Comment: RD, your analogy is hopelessly false, but that has never stopped you in the past.
[EX A]: Non-identity-attack

[EX Q]: Comment: Hmmmmm.
Let me see.  Someone to the south of us was just judged best suited for the task of the presidency solely because of his business background.
And he was celebrated during the campaign because he didn't "come across as "wishy washy."
That ain't working out too well. 
Maybe we should apply some other criteria when selecting these guys.
To quote Betrand Russell:
"The trouble with the world is that the stupid are cocksure and the intelligent are full of doubt."
[EX A]: Non-identity-attack

[EX Q]: Comment: @Telford & Steve: My argument is that Trump is an "idiot", "disaster", "threat to world peace", "tweeted something un-presidential" etc etc - gig is getting stale. We get it. If that means "defending" him (something I did not do at all talking about the DNC/Clinton); it just shows how obsessed with Trump bashing BS/DM/detractor have become. 

Instead, I am arguing, why not report, reflect and provide opinion on the biggest news story of the week. Heck, BS, can still get in all his swipes at Trump.

Instead, I would suggest the silence, shows why the whole "fake news" meme is now mostly associated with the mainstream media. Why a plurality of Americans think the media make up stories on Trump. That the media will jump on every single scandal associated with Team Red, but when it comes to Team Blue - obfuscate,  delay and hand-wave. 

@Steve - The mysterious Republican has not been revealed and backed up with a name. The DNC/Clinton angle has...so what is the better claim for now?
[EX A]:
Non-identity-attack