Given a document, an entity and its sentiment towards the entity, verify if it is the correct sentiment towards the entity. Answer should be yes or no. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

[EX Q]: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Koontz Jane Hawk is Negative . Jane  knows  her  husband didn't commit suicide but proving it has been a challenge.  She  uncovered an evil plot to brainwash people to commit horrific acts  but  her  attempt to destroy the villain behind everything came with a horrible cost.  She  no longer has  her  job at the FBI and is a wanted fugitive.  She  keeps  her  son stashed away to protect him.  Jane  now roams the country to derail the mastermind and his nefarious plans.
A beloved schoolteacher on leave due to migraines is the latest to fall under the vicious mind games. She has dreams of walking through fire  and one afternoon she sets her vehicle on fire and drives through a hotel lobby. A sheriff uncovers her journals and sees a woman crying for help. When  Jane  learns of the incident   she  knows the people  she 's trying to eliminate are responsible.  She  has already gone rogue  and knowing  her  son is safe   she  has nothing to lose by going after the culprits.
When one of  her  targets tells  her   "You're dead already. They'll all know about you in the whispering room "  Jane  knows  she  has to learn what  his  cryptic phrase means even though it obviously will be a trap to take  her  out of the picture.
 The character of Jane Hawk  is arguably the best character Koontz has created. Knowledge of "The Silent Corner" helps put some of the narrative in perspective  but it's not necessary to fall under the author's spell. It's clear that another story featuring  her  quest for ultimate justice is on the horizon  and hopefully there will be even more after that.
[EX A]: no

[EX Q]: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Matt Cureton is Negative . Peggy Humanick is probably thanking her lucky stars that  19-year-old Matt Cureton  was working at the Wendyâs in Fort Pierce  Fla.  on Monday.
Lucky for Peggy   Cureton  found her purse hanging off the back of a chair while  he  was bussing their table  and turned over the lost item to  his  manager  Betsy Hersha  to hold.
âI just did what I would hope everyone would do in that situation â  Cureton  told the Sun Sentinel. âIf I lost my wallet I would hope someone would return it rather than taking from it. I try to live by that standard â the golden rule.â
The Humanicks then hopped in their car and headed straight back to Fort Pierce  where  Cureton  and Hersha were waiting.
 Cureton  was rewarded $100 by the Humanicks for  his  honesty  which Hersha says she had to convince  him  to take.
âI hugged  him   I told  him  Iâm very proud of  him   use the money on  himself  â Hersha said.
âIt was very considerate of them  they were a very nice couple â  he  said. âThey didnât have to give me anything.â
 Cureton  said  he  is working at the fast food chain to save money for college.  He  told the Sun Sentinel all of the reward money will go into  his  college savings.
[EX A]: no

[EX Q]: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Rachel Maddow is Neutral . MSNBC star Rachel Maddowâs latest anti-Trump conspiracy theory was so outlandish that even the dependably liberal HuffPost criticized it as "so flimsy that it could be debunked by a quick glance at a map."
On Thursday evening  "The Rachel Maddow Show" opened with a somber 25-minute diatribe that attempted to connect the tragic ambush attack that killed four American soldiers in Niger to the latest version of President Trumpâs proposed travel ban  which included the nation of Chad.  Maddow  essentially claimed that the inclusion of Chad  which recently pulled  its  troops out of Niger  in the revised travel ban resulted in extremist attacks such as the one that left four Americans dead.
The HuffPost  which is so anti-Trump that it refused to even cover him in the political section during the early stages of his campaign  published a story headlined  "What the hell was this  Rachel Maddow  segment?" The MSNBC host proclaimed that Chadâs pullout from Niger "had an immediate effect in emboldening ISIS attacks " but the HuffPost easily shot down her theory.
Colby College Department of Government assistant professor Laura Seay told the HuffPost that "any expert" would have said  Maddow 's conspiracy theory was "crazy" and the pullout of Chadian troops isnât necessarily related to the Trumpâs travel ban.
"Everybody that I know is appalled by this. I would like to think that  Maddow 's researchers are more responsible " Seay told the HuffPost.
"The Rachel Maddow Show" declined to comment to HuffPost but the host addressed the situation on Friday nightâs episode.
"Over the course of the day today  lots of people have been very upset with me for reporting that last night  which is fine. I didnât know you cared. But the upset over my reporting doesnât mean that anything I reported wasnât true "  Maddow  said. "Everything I reported was true."
 Maddow  continued: "Now  this doesnât mean that Chad withdrawing their troops was necessarily the cause of what happened to those U.S. troops who were ambushed. That ambush is being described by the Pentagon as a shock."
The HuffPostâs Willa Frej wrote that  Maddow  built "myths" using unrelated or unreliable information and "reduced the story so thoroughly that it lost any semblance of the larger truth."
 Maddow  has seen increased viewership as the triggered left tunes in to watch  her  condemn Trump on a nightly basis  butit seems the MSNBC host this time went too far for one of the most liberal publications in America.
[EX A]:
no