instruction:
Given a paragraph about cooking, and a set of conversational questions and answers about the paragraph, say whether the passage contains sufficient information to answer the follow-up question. Say Yes if it is answerable; otherwise, say No. The paragraph has the prefix 'CONTEXT:'. Each conversation question has a prefix `Q:` followed by the answer prefix `A:`, and the follow-up question has a prefix `FOLLOWUP_Q:`.
question:
CONTEXT: The term is not really defined that way. In the strict sense, it only has meaning for lean doughs - made of only flour, water, yeast and salt, eventually preferments or later mixins like seeds. You can extend it to enriched doughs (those that have fat, milk, eggs, tomato juice, etc.) but then it is no longer sharply defined. Calculating the exact content of water (e.g. adding to the calculation 17 g of water for every 100 g of butter) are pretty useless, because the water bound in an emulsion or other kind of colloid doesn't behave the same way as free water when making a dough. So, a dough with 100 g water and 100 g butter will be extremely different from a dough with 117 g of water, and still pretty different from one with 117 g of water and 83 g of oil. So, there is no real formula any more to create an actual percentage. The concept still stays somewhat useful in this case, but you have to "play it by ear". When you are trying to judge how soft a given enriched dough will be, you can start by calculating all the liquid and fat ingredients as if they were "hydration", which gives you a rough guide to compare it to other doughs, and then you have to make it and gain a tactile understanding of how it actually behaves.  <sep>  Q: What counts as "hydration" when figuring Dough Hydration? A: The term is not really defined that way. In the strict sense, it only has meaning for lean doughs  Q: So it won't work for an enriched dough? A: You can extend it to enriched doughs (those that have fat, milk, eggs, tomato juice, etc.) but then it is no longer sharply defined  Q: Would sour cream count as a liquid? A: you can start by calculating all the liquid and fat ingredients as if they were "hydration  Q: Would eggs count as hydration? A: You can extend it to enriched doughs (those that have fat, milk, eggs, tomato juice, etc  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: How do you tell if the dough is hydrated enough?
answer:
Yes


question:
CONTEXT: I believe that 'English Breakfast Tea' is a very broad definition and doesn't refer to an exact blend; each manufacturer has their own version of it. I would say that English Breakfast Tea often includes Assam, but as your Wiki source suggests it also contains other teas. Therefore Assam is a separate tea.  <sep>  Q: Does English Breakfast Tea equal Assam Tea? A: t English Breakfast Tea often includes Assam  Q: I want to make Chai, what kind of tea can I use? A: English Breakfast Tea  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: What temp should I heat the water too for a good brew?
answer:
No


question:
CONTEXT: I don't think so. In the mayonnaise case, all that has happened is the fat has come out of emulsion and gathered together again, so you can re-emulsify it. In the whipped cream case, you've started to create large fat crystals (butter). I guess technically it might work to heat it up to melt the butter, re-emulsify it into cream and then beat it again, but I don't think it would be worth the effort. You could go ahead and finish churning it into butter and buttermilk if you want to avoid wasting the cream.  <sep>  Q: Can ruined whipped cream be rescued? A: but I don't think it would be worth the effort  Q: Whatâs the process? A: heat it up to melt the butter, re-emulsify it into cream and then beat it again  Q: Can it be Re emulsified?###Or am I better off starting a fresh batch? A: re-emulsify it into cream and then beat it again, but I don't think it would be worth the effort  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: So you recommend restarting a new batch?###How long can a batch of whipped cream last in the fridge?
answer:

No