We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

[EX Q]: Sent1: That is why current federal law specifically forbids registration of gun owners and guns and gun transactions: "any system of registration of firearms, firearms owners, or firearms transactions or dispositions.
 Sent2: One such person who is prohibited by federal law from having a firearm at all is the convicted felon:
[EX A]: Not similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: You're saying that guns should be allowed into school in order to allow some students (or teachers) to defend themselves if they were attacked.
 Sent2: Exactly how many shootings took place in these settings when students were allowed to not only bring their legally owned guns with them to school, but could also store them in their lockers inside the school?
[EX A]: Not similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: If the second amendment protects a right to rebel, then it means that the people as a whole have a right to rise up and overthrow a tyrranical government rather than an individual like Timothy McVeigh.
 Sent2: The whole reason why the Second Amendment exists is so that the people could defend themselves against the tyranny of their own government.
[EX A]:
Not similar