In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine the neutral choice based on your inference from the statement and your commonsense knowledge. The neutral choice is a sentence that neither agrees nor disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3', corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence. If sentence X agrees with sentence Y, one's correctness follows from the other one. If sentence X disagrees with sentence Y, they can not be correct at the same time.

Statement: uh i haven't had too much experience with uh judges and jurors i've uh served on a jury one time and uh i think one of my concerns after that experience was uh finding that there tend to be people in the jury that can't bring themselves to sentence someone Choices: 1. I think it's a flaw in the legal system that many would get to run free simply because people don't want to wish harm upon someone.  2. Jurors tend to be ruthless, and never let someone go without a sentence. 3. I find people asked to be Jurors tend not to want to sentence someone. 
1

Statement: New illumination was installed in 1985 to light up the tower from within, and it was the obvious main focus of France's celebrations for the change of the millennium in 1999. Choices: 1. The New Illumination was installed to light up the Eiffel Tower.   2. The New Illumination was not in place to celebrate the new millennium.   3. The New Illumination was the main focus for the new millennium celebrations.  
1

Statement: 'Tell him the real Ben Franklin is ready to talk.' Choices: 1. Ben Franklin has nothing to say to anyone. 2. He wants to speak with the imposter. 3. Someone wants to talk to him.

2