In this task, you're given a statement, and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence clearly disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3' corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.

Q: Statement: An attorney representing a client before judge and jury was no longer the norm of a case when delivering critical legal services to low-income individuals. Choices:  1. Attorneys representing low-income individuals are the norm. 2. The norm of the case was violated when the attorney delivered their services. 3. Low-income individuals are often targeted by the justice system because of their inability to finance their legal battles.

A: 1
****
Q: Statement: He reached for the arm around his neck and began breaking it free from its stranglehold. Choices:  1. He pulled the arm off of his neck.  2. He punched the person strangling him.  3. He allowed the arm to continue choking him. 

A: 3
****
Q: Statement: Each day, its mini-containers had to be re-filled with substances promoting positive processes in the body leading to the return of good mood. Choices:  1. The substances that filled the container looked like blue sand. 2. The mini-containers had to be re-filled everyday. 3. The containers were large and had to be filled every week. 

A:
3
****