instruction:
The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the no-need strategy, otherwise output No. no-need is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used when a participant points out that they do not need an item based on personal context such as suggesting that they have ample water to spare. no-need can directly benefit the opponent since it implies that the item is up for grabs.
question:
Context: 'That sounds pretty reasonable as I am in need of firewood the most. Would it be most reasonable to each take what we need most and split the water down the middle?' 'Yes, it would.' 'I think that sounds fair. The problem is that there are 3 waters and one of us would get two and the other one. How should we sort that?'
Utterance: 'You can take the two water. I am not that thirsty most days.'
answer:
Yes


question:
Context: 'Nice, so are we!' 'That is awesome! The one bad thing about my campsite is there's no stream or lake nearby. I'm going to need a lot of it so I can shower/wash up' 'Well I was hoping to grab some extra water as well, Its suppose to be record highs. '
Utterance: 'I'm sure we can figure something out. I'm going to need a good amount of firewood too to cook my food. The good news is I won't need any food 🙂'
answer:
Yes


question:
Context: 'I'm like that as well, a small appetite.' 'I need firewood the least of all though, because I have a lot of coats for warmth.' 'Are you bringing several coats while camping?'
Utterance: 'Yeah, I might even have too many.I still need water the most,so I'm thinking I should take the water and you should take the firewood.'
answer:

Yes