The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.

[Q]: Context: 'I am good. How about you?  Yes, I love camping!' 'I am doing great! camping is super enjoyable' 'Do you bring enough stuff?'
Utterance: 'I have some stuff, but I really need a decent amount of firewood. Gets really cold at night where we camp'
[A]: Yes


[Q]: Context: 'Hello, how are you doing today?' 'Good. How you doing buddy? 🙂' 'I'm doing pretty good. I plan on camping with the family this weekend, how about you?'
Utterance: 'Nice. Same, it's over 100 degrees where I live. 🙂'
[A]: Yes


[Q]: Context: 'I too have the same issue. I am also asking for children only , better you could accept 1 food , 2 water and 3 firewood, I hope this deal will work out for you' 'I need at least 2 food packages and at least 1 water. I can live with out any extra firewood.' 'Please do understand my situation its very very critical to give 2 food packages to you.Instead you can take 3 waters and firewood too.'
Utterance: 'No that will not work for me given that I have 4 growing children of different ages who eat like adults. I need at least 2 food packages and 1 water. That gives you 1 food package and 2 waters and 3 firewoods.'
[A]:
Yes