In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

Example Input: Sentence: Susan knows all about Ann's personal problems because she is nosy.
 Reason: The 'she' refers to susan because of her "nose" and her "eyes" as in "she knows all about Ann's. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Example Output: Wrong

Example Input: Sentence: I took the water bottle out of the backpack so that it would be lighter.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the backpack because it was the closest thing to a backpack I could find. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Example Output: Wrong

Example Input: Sentence: The path to the lake was blocked, so we couldn't use it .
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the path because we couldn't reach it .The path to the lake was blocked. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Example Output:
Wrong