Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.

[EX Q]: Hey so the person commenting under the name opinions why dont u go fuck yourself. Because were u there when she died? Instead of coming and offering rumors and insults on my friend whos dead show some respect and offer some condolences. She may have not been makin the best choices but in no way asked for or deserved what happened.U still have a voice. She doesnt. R.i.p courtney funk. And opinions- get bent
[EX A]: Yes

[EX Q]: "Most all"? I don't think so.  

It was funny thirty years ago when I first heard it, but there has never been much evidence to support the claim.  Most people couldn't hit the broad side of a LIO with a long gun, much less a pistol, and I've frequently seen people waving guns around with no care in the world for anyone's safety, their own included.  I've nearly been shot twice, both at ranges by someone forgetting to eject the last round from a chamber after removing the magazine.  Twice that I'm aware of.  Both of those times the weapons discharged; no one was hurt.  One guy who's gun went off while several people were downrange, actually laughed and the person next to him awarded him the coveted Black Eye of Stupidity and Failure to Know How This Danged Thing Works Medal.  Both were summarily ejected and asked not to return.  
   
But thanks for your two cents worth.
[EX A]: No

[EX Q]: There is one issue very lightly and indirectly mentioned in this article,  which has a very large effect to not only future development in Alaska but anywhere else in this nation.  Collier stated it quite well, "regulator is sleeping with environmental activists and nobody seems to care".

The EPA is one of several Federal agencies which are taking preemptive strikes against business and personal affairs, long before those entities have any legal authority to do so.  From closing established access roads, such as was tried with the Kantishna miners, shutting off water access and limiting grazing land for ranchers, prohibiting American citizens from "viewing" Mount Rushmore from a "public" roadway, to publicly denigrating a potential business way before any permits for development were ever applied for.  Under the original law, was when such agencies  became involved.  

This then becomes 'Rule and Control' by the highest bidder or by Dictatorial edict from the elite.  Not the law!
[EX A]:
Yes