Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.

Input: Consider Input: Just make sure that not one watt goes to mining, not one public penny either. Never. Donlin Gold  
(Barrick and Nova Gold) will use appoximately the same amount of natural gas (for instance) as Anchorage. Check the really awful human rights and environmental record of such companies who would come here to mine and use hydroelectricity. They would make a large take-home-out-of-Alaska profit if they could use hydroelectricity (at our land, water and state budget expense). Tell them to repair the lives, lands and waters they've damaged before they ever come here. Why was Jim Bowles, a Conoco Phillips executive on the board of the Nature Conservancy in a time of climate change? There should be an adversarial relationship between those trying to save the earth and those whose activities would destroy it. Are there mining executives on the board now?

Output: No


Input: Consider Input: The solution Randall was provided by Professor Johnathan Gruber of MIT who wrote most of the ACA for the Obama crowd. And as you recall his recorded comments  were that the American public is so stupid they  will buy into the programs even though it raises all costs, does not improve health care delivery, and there are not enough doctors to service the basic system.  It wasn't enough that Obama illegally stole 600+billion from MEDICARE to help pay for the illegal program, that theft of dedicated funds still has not been corrected by the courts but some issues have. So just where is Mrs. Martell/Murkowski going wrong?

Output: Yes


Input: Consider Input: Bunch of hype created by Nate Herz and ADN. Can't imagine anyone fearfull of such a failure as Mark Begich.


Output: Yes