We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Q: VOC isn't a good debator since his points are meandering and generic.

A: Invalid
****
Q: And 83% seems to be the common error rate for "innocents" claims by death penalty opponents.

A: Valid
****
Q: Capital punishment frees up jail cells: Considering how few people we execute and how many new people enter the prison system each year, I do not see this as being a very good argument.

A:
Valid
****