We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

Lott and Whitley found that not only did such laws not save lives, they cost lives by making it more difficult to have a firearm ready for a sudden emergency.
Valid

Isn't the right to bear arms carved in the Constitution tablets that Jefferson brought down from Capitol Hill?
Valid

That is exactly what will happen with new gun control, the people who break the existing laws will mere just scoff at the new ones.

Valid