In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

Input: Consider Input: Sentence: The lawyer asked the witness a question, but he was reluctant to repeat it.
 Reason: The 'he' refers to the lawyer because he was reluctant to repeat it. The lawyer asked the witness a question. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

Output: Correct


Input: Consider Input: Sentence: Bob paid for Charlie's college education. He is very grateful.
 Reason: The 'He' refers to charlie because Charlie received the benefit so he would be grateful. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

Output: Correct


Input: Consider Input: Sentence: Susan knew that Ann's son had been in a car accident, so she told her about it.
 Reason: The 'she' refers to susan because IF she is found out, Susan must of found out about the crash from Ann telling her. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 


Output: Correct