In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

[EX Q]: Comment: Almost forgot - to all the Leaf haters - suck it - suck it good!
[EX A]: Sexual-explicit

[EX Q]: Comment: Mueller's problem is that he saddled someone else's ass.
[EX A]: Sexual-explicit

[EX Q]: Comment: Mr Yakopatz, Trump's supporters apparently love it when he "tells it like it is," so perhaps you'll extend me the same courtesy in this comment. Let me be frank: You don't give a rip what a 14-yr old Jewish boy may or may not have done in Eastern Europe seventy years ago. You care about this out-of-context quote from an old interview only because it enables you to marginalize the views of a man with whose politics you disagree.

Therein lies the problem with these boards, if not the nature of political discourse writ large. For too many people of every political persuasion, information is valued only as it can be wielded as a cudgel. Facts are to be deployed not for achieving knowledge or respecting the views of others, but as malleable weapons used to vanquish a foe.

If those of us on the left who support Soros have to answer for his actions of 1944, then may I suggest you, Corbeil, JetRx et al. should have to shoulder the burdens of your man who grabs women by the pussy.
[EX A]:
Sexual-explicit