We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

[Q]: Sent1: With trials and appeals, one execution can end up costing more than a life sentence by the time the execution is actually carried out.
 Sent2: Actually, the idea that the death penalty costs more than lifetime imprisonment has been disproved many times.
[A]: Similar


[Q]: Sent1: Unless there can be solid uncontestable evidence shown that the death penalty is significant in deterring crime, this cannot be used as an argument for the death penalty.
 Sent2: Therefore the argument of death as a deterent is a joke.
[A]: Similar


[Q]: Sent1: What does this have to do with the death penalty?
 Sent2: There shouldn't be a death penalty it isn't fair.
[A]:
Not similar