We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Input: Consider Input: Sent1: If you believe what you say in:as it is presently, gun crimes still occur, people have their rights to own guns revoked on a case by case basis, and dying of gun shots is actually very rare.
 Sent2: The only case you could possibly make is more accidents with more guns at gun shows.

Output: Not similar


Input: Consider Input: Sent1: The organized militia is equivalent to the well regulated militia of the second amendment.
 Sent2: Yeah, thing is that the second ammendment makes the point that guns should be allowed because a _well organised militia_ is an important tool for a nation.

Output: Not similar


Input: Consider Input: Sent1: After all, since these lethal weapons are only used to kill or maim, the police must only carry them to kill or maim, huh?
 Sent2: all guns are used for is killing, they are weapons.


Output: Similar