In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.

[EX Q]: Comment: A human being was killed. Is that really something to celebrate?
[EX A]: Disagree

[EX Q]: Comment: Justin has said $1500 isn't enough to buy influence in his government.

At least now we know you need a million dollar donation to daddy's foundation to go along with that $1500.
[EX A]: Agree

[EX Q]: Comment: I have a challenge that I extend to any members or supporters of the Toronto Chapter of Black Lives Matter.

Do you folks realize what a poor reputation you have with so many Canadians?

Seriously, you wreck a recent parade by laying down and obstructing and refusing to budge.

Who does that?

And your group has trouble - I mean seriously - has trouble somehow seeing that it is a HELPFUL thing for society when police are there in support of a pride parade with a police float?

My view of the Toronto Chapter of Black Lives Matter is that it is an organization comparable to a pile of unhelpful garbage. You folks are elbows up, in peoples' faces, demanding everything be your way or no way, you are like a bunch of three year olds having angry tantrums, you are like Donald Trump.

Please feel free to try to defend your pathetic organization under this post. Or else just accept it: Your group provides a lousy role model for anybody noticing your group.
[EX A]:
Agree