Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.

Q: That's an interesting take. I don't know if I'd be for or against that but it's worth pondering. But it is worth remembering in the quest for statehood and crafting of the Constitution, the 101 million acres the state received and the sub surface mineral rights were negotiated and fought for. Hence, this owner state concept is what has given us the oil wealth.

A: No
****
Q: The fact that some children get a poor education is indisputable -- that goes for homeschooled and public schooled kids. What checks and balances could actually prevent this? Public schools have gone to more and more and more standardized tests (most AK homeschoolers aren't independent and also take these) and attempts to legislate that everyone score well. How well does that work? As for homeschoolers, you could add more paperwork. Some states do. Someone willing to hide their kids in the basement is probably cool with fudging or skipping the paperwork. Internet forums abound with instructions on how to get through paperwork hoops. Do we send inspectors to every home? Whose standards do they use? "Checks and Balances" is a good idea, truly, but only if we think through what checks are effective, practical, and don't cause more harm than they prevent. Ideas?

A: No
****
Q: I heard through a grapevine that the cops know who and where the "owner"  guy is.  I hope in the least,  that the owner is brought in on any conspiracy charge that might apply.  Plus - he and the A** that did the hands on,  MUST pay all medical costs incurred to the hospital,  and on going medical costs for earl for the rest of earl's life...the "owner", of course, no longer having any contact what so ever.

A:
Yes
****