We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Input: Consider Input: Since there is no clear evidence indicating that there is any deterrent value to the death penalty, I have trouble rationalizing it as a punishment.

Output: Valid


Input: Consider Input: I have gotten about a dozen people to take my "try it before you shoot off your mouth" challenge, and every single one of them changed their tune by the end of their little adventure.

Output: Invalid


Input: Consider Input: Law should never be ruled from the victims point of view - if this was the point then we wouldn't bother with courts and just stick with vigilante justice.


Output: Valid