Categorize the comment on the basis of severe toxicity. If the comment is severely toxic output Yes, otherwise output No.

Ex Input:
The thought of Clinton as president makes me retch. Its ironic that a country that touts itself as the richest, most powerful, best place to live has offered us a lying, thieving, crooked bitch and a narcissistic, greedy, erratic (albeit successful) businessman to select from for the position of "Commander and Chief" of the free world. You'd think we could do better. The pivotal factor likely will be who they select for VP. If I were Clinton I'd select Sanders. If I were Trump it'd be Neut who was (is)generally a highly respected, politically savvy leader who will ostensibly add stability to an otherwise unstable candidate.

Ex Output:
Yes


Ex Input:
Dick, you didn't read very closely. These are not the union guys, they are management. But they will make good money. Just about as much as you did collecting refuse.

Ex Output:
Yes


Ex Input:
I've always had a soft spot for this passage of the Bible:
Yet she increased her prostitution, remembering the days of her youth when she engaged in prostitution in the land of Egypt. She lusted after their genitals – as large as those of donkeys, and their seminal emission was as strong as that of stallions.
Ezekiel 23:19

Ex Output:

Yes