The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.

[EX Q]: Context: 'im sorry i mistyped. okay yes thats a deal. so last we have to talk about the wood. what do you think' 'Oh yes, sorry I am so caught up with my wound I completely forgot about that. I can spare 1 firewood so you would get 2, do you think you could spare another water in exchange for the wood?' 'i cant unfortunately i really need the two water im sorry. '
Utterance: 'im so sorrry unfortunately i am in dire need of two wood we are in a very cold climate'
[EX A]: Yes

[EX Q]: Context: 'hi turker i will be needing firewood as well because i need to keep warm while i camp.i suggest i take 2 firewood, 1 water and 1 food while you can have 1 firewood, 2 water and two foods' 'I can take 2 firewoods, you can take all the food and most of the water. So, I am offering you all the food and water.🙂' 'I suggest you look at my offer because you can get hungry and also need water.i really need the firewood as well'
Utterance: 'We already have more food than we need due to the extra people who brought more food than we'll eat. Plus, we're near a fresh water supply. And there's so much snow, it's insane🙂I need all the firewood. '
[EX A]: Yes

[EX Q]: Context: 'Hello 🙂'
Utterance: 'Hello to you!'
[EX A]:
No