In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.
--------
Question: Comment: The neofuedalist 0.1% don't give a rodent's derriere about the trauma and suffering of mere citizens.  The borders must vanish, the cultures must smush together, the world must become a society of rootless serfs.

Answer: Sexual-explicit


Question: Comment: No kidding... not once did he call someone a fat slob or mock a handicapped person.   How dare he.   Maybe he will grab someone by the p*ssy to redeem himself.

Answer: Sexual-explicit


Question: Comment: I agree that "Hawaiian" should be considered a nationality of a bygone kingdom which was established by illegal, violent force of vicious warlords who never put anything up to a vote or asked for international recognition.  Furthermore, the original Marquesan settlers of these islands are the Kanaka Maoli (or whatever is Marquesan for original people).  We could keep turning back the clock to various points in time (though OHA and others only want to look at the fancy Iolani Palace days when a revolution led to our becoming the 50th State.  I say let's look forward as Americans who enjoy rights and wealth that neither the original Marquesan settlers nor the later Tahitian conquerors (today's part-Hawaiians) could never have dreamed about.  The only way that OHA or any of these phony baloney "Hawaiian Kingdoms" have any hope of prevailing in subverting our statehood for either of their nutty agenda is by force.  I don't see that happening.  But, FYI, I'll be defending statehood.

Answer:
Non-sexual-explicit