Categorize the comment on the basis of obscenity. If the comment is obscene output Yes, otherwise output No.
--------
Question: Yes the dang thing was a donation but only after a failed attempt to get the city to fund it. And, yes the money spent developing a place for it is breathtaking.

Since the city was unable to find a useful and legal way to spend this tax money perhaps they should have returned it?

Answer: No


Question: Good column, Mike. No incumbents! Please, Someone from Nikiski run against Boss Hawg Chenault? He's got the whole district cowed. There are so many tweakers in his district, the only way to get them to vote is a meth-lab polling place! The rest are oilies.  Oh, and then there's the Commercial Fishermen who are trying to scratch out a living, too busy to run. C'mon, Nikiski? Is there no fervent Alaskan among you with enough cajones to challenge The Neighborhood Bully??

Answer: No


Question: At more than one of the private enterprises I worked at we had a few folks that made well past 100K a year as well.  That was a product of a job few wanted to bid into, a work force that was under staffed and a 24X7X365 operation.  I came close to that figure in 1979 due to a combo of those factors plus an added managerial bungle of bidding a contract way under the true cost.  Finally, anyone can put their nose to the grindstone and go after those jobs.  If they have what it takes.  Good luck with that.

Answer:
No