We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

[EX Q]: Sent1: It is interesting to note that the DOJ stats reveal our crimes and murders dropped 63% during the time that the newly "gun free" nations increased and while we were adding many more guns and passing carry laws.
 Sent2: For every one crime gun that California exports, we get more than two crime guns imported back into our state."
[EX A]: Not similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: If anything, it has ruled in favor of gun control, saying in the Miller case that "The Second Amendment must be interpreted and applied with a view to its purpose of rendering effective the Militia."
 Sent2: First, the ruling was that the Second Amendment only applied to firearms that had a militia purposes and that the sawed-off shotgun in question didn't have any evidence of being suitable for a militia.
[EX A]: Similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: We should protect gun laws because of crazy people who go out of control with them and guns these days are getting more advanced and easier to get
 Sent2: That most people can't be trusted, so we should have more laws against guns, which most people will abide by because they can be trusted.
[EX A]:
Not similar