The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the vouch-fair strategy, otherwise output No. vouch-fair is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to call out fairness for personal benefit, either when acknowledging a fair deal or when the opponent offers a deal that benefits them. This can be through an explicit call out or can be implied.

[Q]: Context: 'understood, I can give you 1 firewood, 2 food, and 2 water to make your trip better.' 'Hm. I''ll definitely take you up on the water, thanks for that. The thing is, I have low blood pressure, and I have trouble regulating my body temperature so I am frequently cold. How about if I take two firewood, and the two waters. It sounds like you are going to do a lot of cooking, so you can take two of the food.  ' 'Will you take two firewood, 1 food, and 1 water?'
Utterance: 'I don't want to take too much food, I want you to be able to enjoy all the cooking you are going to do🙂! But I would like two waters--I'd be afraid of dehydrating on my trip. I'd even throw in the extra food! that would give you all three! you could really do some cooking then! '
[A]: Yes


[Q]: Context: 'No 3 packages of firewood, 1 package of water, and I can give you 3 packages of food.  I need the Firewood the most.' 'Tell me why you need so much firewood?' 'I have other people coming with me and we don't have insulated sleeping bags.  The temperature also drops drastically at night.'
Utterance: 'Well i need at least 1 firewood so we have to make that work'
[A]: Yes


[Q]: Context: 'We can try to figure out a way to split the water and food in the fairest way 🙂. Firewood isn't an issue so it doesn't matter as much. I think to start something like splitting the food 2/1 and the water 1/2?' 'That might work. I can always boil it and I could use the extra food for the kids.' 'Ok so I propose 2 water for me, 1 for you. 2 food for you, 1 for me. Firewood would be, 2 for you, 1 for me? Please give me your opinion if you want to reverse any of that.'
Utterance: 'That would work, the extra firewood would offset the need to have water on hand when I can boil it.'
[A]:
No