Given a document, generate a short title of the document. The title should convey the main idea/event/topic about which the document is being written. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

The increasingly difficult climate for home builders and the inability of the Chavez government to deliver on promises to build enough apartments and houses have led to a housing deficit now estimated at 2 million units.
 Chavez has announced several plans to address the problem  and has often said housing should be controlled by the government. He recently announced a new kind of low-income housing to be financed by oil revenues. Still  last year  private industry built 45 600 units  twice as many as the government.
 Cabello  the Chavez minister who announced the decree requiring builders to refund buyers  said his office had received 1 700 complaints in recent weeks from home buyers about excessive mark-ups for inflation.
 So far this year  Chavez and his local allies have seized dozens of private properties  mostly farms and ranches that the government deems underutilized. He has also encouraged squatters to occupy land and residential buildings. The measures reflect Chavez's goal of building a socialist economy and to weaken private enterprise  but they have had a chilling effect on new construction  thus exacerbating the housing shortage  critics say.
 One new wrinkle was added this week when Chavez allies in the Vargas state government authorized the takeover of two golf courses in a Caracas suburb called Caraballada. Local officials say the courses will be converted into housing and parkland.
 "Venezuela has always had a housing deficit  but it's gotten worse in the last 10 years  since Chavez took office " Puente said. "With the oil price boom  he has had the resources to improve things  but relatively little has been accomplished."
 If the government decree sticks  Briceno is unsure how he will manage the refunds and whether he will be able to keep his 300 workers on the payroll.
 "If this becomes law " he said  "the collateral effects will be loss of jobs and economic paralysis."
Venezuelan Home Builders Protest Change in Terms

In what appears to be a shrewd attempt to preempt sexual harassment allegations  leftist documentary filmmaker Morgan Spurlock has published an essay  detailing his own struggle with sexual impropriety — and admitting to everything from sexual harassment to marital infidelity to  potentially  rape.
In reality  the essay may be an attempt to head off a wave of allegations coming  Spurlock 's way. In the piece   Spurlock  admits to settling at least one sexual harassment lawsuit  over an incident with a female employee who complained about Spurlock's on-set behavior  and to cheating on all of his romantic partners  including his two wives.
A segment of the essay is devoted to a rape accusation made against him in college.  Spurlock  claims  he  got drunk and then had sex with a girl  who  despite appearing to give consent  decided later that she felt taken advantage of.
 Spurlock  also lists a host of potential excuses for  his  behavior  from having an absent father to sexual abuse  he  says  he  suffered as a child.  He  also claims to have had something of a drinking problem "since age 13."  He  says  he  is "seeking help."
 Spurlock  is most famous for  his  series of documentaries  like "Supersize Me " exposing destructive American habits. Perhaps unsurprisingly   his  next project details issues women face in the modern world.
Leftist Filmmaker Morgan Spurlock Preempts Claims Admits To Sexual Harassment

President Donald Trump's critics are arguing that GOP calls for the Justice Department to investigate  Hillary Clinton  and Democrats' ties to Russia are an effort to distract from the real Russia investigation  into potential Trump-Russia collusion.
Ever since Watergate  the mantra of all major corruption investigations has been to "follow the money." Well  Americans of all political stripes should be outraged by the fact that both Democrats and Republicans in Washington are up to their eyeballs in Kremlin cash. Russian money found its way into the pockets of not only Trump advisers like Paul Manafort and Rick Gates â who were recently indicted by special counsel Robert Mueller âbut also Democratic power lobbyist Tony Podesta   Bill Clinton  and the Clinton Foundation.
This should suggest to objective observers that Russia was using its money to influence both sides in order to advance the Kremlin's interests. And it means that any full and impartial investigation of Russia's efforts to influence our political process needs to follow the Russian money flowing into the coffers of  the Clintons    their  foundation and  their  top associates.
The New York Times reported in 2015 that "shortly after the Russians announced their intention to acquire a majority stake in Uranium One   [former President Bill] Clinton  received $500 000 for a Moscow speech from a Russian investment bank with links to the Kremlin that was promoting Uranium One stock." In total  $145 million went to  the Clinton Foundation  from interests linked to Uranium One  which was acquired by the Russian government nuclear agency Rosatum.
Think that was just a coincidence? As former federal prosecutor Andy McCarthy points out  the Uranium One deal is not a national security scandal  it is a corruption scandal involving " Clinton  family self-dealing." Ask yourself: How many half-a-million-dollar speeches has  Bill Clinton  given to Kremlin-linked banks since  Hillary Clinton  was defeated? How much Russian money is flowing into  the Clinton Foundation 's coffers today? If Donald Trump had given a $500 000 speech paid for by a Kremlin bank  and his private foundation had accepted $145 million from Vladimir Putin-linked oligarchs and their Western business partners  do you think that his critics would be insisting there was nothing to see here?
A look at  Hillary Clinton 's time as first lady  U.S. senator  secretary of state and a Democratic candidate for president.
We should all be deeply concerned by how much Russian cash was sloshing around Washington  and how much of it found its way into  the bank accounts of the Clintons  and those around  them . And we should all  Democrats and Republicans alike  want to get to the bottom of it.
As Americans  it goes against our sensibilities to encourage the Justice Department of one party to investigate the vanquished candidate of the other party. But does the fact that  Clinton  lost mean Americans don't deserve to know the full extent of Russia's efforts to influence our political process?
None of this absolves the Trump campaign or calls into question the intelligence community's conclusion that "Putin and the Russian Government aspired to help ... Trump's election chances." But it does underscore that the Russians were smart in what the intelligence community calls their efforts to "undermine public faith in the US democratic process." They played both sides  and in so doing preyed on the singular weakness of the Clintons and those around them â greed.
Any impartial investigation of Russia's efforts to meddle in our democratic process needs to include a full inquiry of the Russian money flowing into  Clinton  world. Such an inquiry is not a distraction. It is critical to restoring public faith in American democracy.
Trump's obsession with  Hillary Clinton  should scare everyone
A Bill Clinton 'reckoning' for Democrats? Don't hold your breath.

Bill and Hillary Clinton should be investigated