We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

[Q]: No more pain, no more suffering, no more hardship, no more earthly demands, no more constantly uncertaintly, no more worrying, no more problems.
[A]: Invalid


[Q]: Do you expect 12 executions per year to deter a murder rate of the above mentioned amount?
[A]: Valid


[Q]: i think that life without opportunity of parole is the more humane and just punishment instead of the death penalty.
[A]:
Valid