We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

[Q]: You're STILL failing to prove that individual gun ownership is an outdated belief that should be abandoned!
[A]: Valid


[Q]: Cornell is right when he suggests that an individual right theory was discussed, because that point was conceded and no one disputed that the black men who suffered under Cruikshank���s actions had an individual RKBA.
[A]: Valid


[Q]: Do you extend that derogatory standard to other items within the constitution that people have a desire to take part in?
[A]:
Valid