We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Ex Input:
Sent1: Consequences are there to deter people from doing wrong."
 Sent2: Most people who would be deterred already seem to be deterred by life without parole as a punishment.

Ex Output:
Not similar


Ex Input:
Sent1: The jury sees partially false evidence which has been biased by a lawyer and the emotions of the family members, and then convicts an innocent person and sentence him to death.
 Sent2: A life sentence can be reversed if th convicted individual is later found innocent by new evidence.

Ex Output:
Not similar


Ex Input:
Sent1: My final point is, whether you believe in the afterlife or whether you think once we're dead this is it, do you not think death is the least punishing form of punishment?
 Sent2: As far as I know, you may as well ACTUALLY believe any number of things, if you actually believe in the death penalty.

Ex Output:

Not similar