instruction:
In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.
question:
Comment: If the Democrats had any brains they would never "block" a Supreme Court nominee just based on ideology.  If they are not qualified that is one thing but if they are not a left winger that is nonsense.  Maybe the Republicans should then block any leftie from the court who is otherwise qualified.  This kind of stuff is what ruins our entire system and makes people not trust it at all.  We want good judges who are not buried in ideology but can rule on the facts and the law.  How hard is that?  Often, it is much easier than checking a potential ruling against a certain ideology.  Try it!
answer:
Non-sexual-explicit


question:
Comment: You know nothing about vegans or vegetarians, then you go and lump them into the SAME category as "food fetishists"!  Like those young men in the Book of Daniel, yes?
answer:
Non-sexual-explicit


question:
Comment: I came, I saw, I kicked some ass.
I could and I did.
answer:

Sexual-explicit