In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

Example Input: Sentence: Fred watched TV while George went out to buy groceries. After an hour he got back.
 Reason: The 'he' refers to george because George went out and came back, thus he is the pronoun. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Example Output: Correct

Example Input: Sentence: Dr. Adams informed Kate that she had cancer and presented several options for future treatment.
 Reason: The 'she' refers to kate because If Kate was the one retiring, she would not need to be informed. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Example Output: Wrong

Example Input: Sentence: The man couldn't lift his son because he was so heavy.
 Reason: The 'he' refers to the son because His son is referred to as the pronoun here a word that can function by itself as a noun phrase and that refers either to the participants in the discourse. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Example Output:
Wrong