Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.

[EX Q]: I'm not following. If he said there will not be a reduction to the general fund, and the county has in fact increased spending $5 million from the GF...how is that a reduction?
[EX A]: No

[EX Q]: "Leave your entitled attitude behind when you leave anchorage. Drivers out here are not accustomed to this and are not expecting it."

"We are constantly ran off sidewalks by riders speeding by. The entitled attitudes are not endearing."

Seems that everyone believes that bicyclists are behaving "entitled".  I side with the sidewalk pedestrians.  Bikes are vehicles that belong on the roads.  The car drivers should leave their entitled attitudes at home.  Better yet, they should get their fat butts on a bicycle since most of them need the exercise.
[EX A]: Yes

[EX Q]: This is residential property. Why does the muni need it? First it's the LIO downtown and now this. Berkowitz owes taxpayers an explanation!
[EX A]:
No