In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

[EX Q]: Comment: Yes, and Hillary Clinton had people murdered... Grow up.
[EX A]: Non-obscene

[EX Q]: Comment: You are all of you so stupid. Where was the dog? The dog was on his owners property. The shooter broke the law, the shooter was not in danger. The shooter aimed at a sitting still dog. The dog had a shock collar that kept it inside the property. The shooter should be charged with destruction of property, harassment, and unlawful discharge of a weapon in city limits. Throw the GOD DAMN BOOK AT HIM!
[EX A]: Obscene

[EX Q]: Comment: Because we think - and have reason to - that the leadership of the "lovers" are a)powerful and b) want to return the whole church to the rigidity of patriarchal absolutism, thus ridding it of me and some others.  If we are doing a disservice to the true lovers let us point to the prime culprits. I will watch "The Maltese Falcon" anytime without fear of a movement to go back to all black and white with poor sound.
[EX A]:
Non-obscene