We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

[EX Q]: Sent1: I don't believe that they should because if you kill someone, they won't have the chance to either get rehabilitated nor will they have the chance to actually regret what they have done.
 Sent2: You make it sound as though if someone is innocent, of anything, they should be killed.
[EX A]: Not similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: There are some who need to be put to death.
 Sent2: Should the abuser be put to death, that would be to good for him.
[EX A]: Not similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: There are no children being killed, and killing a child is murder in America.
 Sent2: How can you justify teaching a generation of children that to stop killers from killing because killing is wrong, we should kill them?
[EX A]:
Not similar