In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

[EX Q]: Comment: your either an islamist or a far left(marxist) who hates Jesus Christ...
there are no homicide baptists running around, genius!!
-------------------------------------
THIS is hate; all from the Qur’an.”

The eternal, unchanging words of Allah:

Q 2:193 “And kill them [unbelievers] wherever you find them.”

Q 2:216 “Fighting is prescribed for you.”

Q 8:12 “I will strike terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve. Therefore
strike off their heads and strike off every fingertip of them.”

Q 9:5 “Slay the idolaters wherever you find them, and take them captive and
besiege them and lie in wait for them in every ambush.”

Q 9:123 “O you who believe! Fight those of the unbelievers who are near to you
and let them find in you hardness.”

Q 4:73 “So, when you meet those who disbelieve smite at their necks till when
you have killed them and wounded many of them.”

Q 5:14 : “We [Muslims] estranged them [Christians] with enmity and HATRED
between one and the other, TO THE DAY OF JUDGMENT.”
[EX A]: Identity-attack

[EX Q]: Comment: Playing a tiny violin right now for you sad bitter John.
[EX A]: Non-identity-attack

[EX Q]: Comment: You're operating with incomplete information at hand, making assumptions based on media frames to fill the gaps (i.e. Assad is a "bloody dictator" whose ability of being rational is questionable). This argument about selling him out for a concession from US doesn't stand. It's based on a supposition about what Assad might think might happen. But that discounts years of consistent and mutually-pragmatic policies on Assad's and Russia's sides.
[EX A]:
Non-identity-attack