In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

[EX Q]: Comment: It's a couch.  It, and this story, and any and all hullaballoo is ridiculous and a perfect example of the MSM making mountains out of molehills to fit a political agenda.  

And besides, as many people have pointed out,  numerous POTUSs of the past (including Great Saint Obama himself) would commonly put their feet on the Resolute Desk.  

If Conway is showing a lack of respect or decorum for putting her feet on some random purchased couch that is barely a couple years old, then what does that say about Presidents who put their feet on a unique piece of American history?  I mean... that LBJ was sure a disrespectful POS, eh?  

Or is that just the narrative when it's a politico from a party you dislike?  Biased garbage.
[EX A]: Non-sexual-explicit

[EX Q]: Comment: My original post to which you responded, was in the context of revolution. Did you miss that?
It seems to me that you're filling in some blanks with fantasy. I have no intention of starting a civil war, a revolution, of invading anyone's home, or killing someone because his or her political points of view differ from mine. In the light of recent events, it seems that it's more likely progressives who kill their ideological adversaries.
However, should there be a civil war between progressives and conservatives, I'd be supporting the conservatives in all ways of which I'm capable. I sincerely hope it never comes to that.
To be really clear, I do consider progressivism to be a social/political cancer that if allowed to grow will eventually kill the host.
[EX A]: Non-sexual-explicit

[EX Q]: Comment: Should be a lesson to all men--be careful where you stick your dick!
[EX A]:
Sexual-explicit