In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

[Q]: Comment: The way the state runs, these ridiculous laws always cost more to enforce then they ever bring in.  There are already fines in place for littering and money isn't motivating the state to enforce those more vigorously.
[A]: Non-sexual-explicit


[Q]: Comment: That is 100 % an impossibility. If you are pro life and vote and support candidates and a party that advocates full term and late term abortion at will then you cannot under any circumstance be pro life.

You have to look at where the candidates stand. Hillary wants us to be required to provide and pay for abortions and abortive medicines. She stated flat out in the debate she supports full term partial birth murder. HOW can ANY Catholic support her. Then there are the e - mails where she, through her campaign, states how "backwards" we are and advocates groups to sping to action when they can incite a "Catholic Spring." SHE will use law and the courts to mandate the marrying of homosexuals and the providing of abortion procedures. No Catholic can vote for her.
[A]: Non-sexual-explicit


[Q]: Comment: What I am worried about is not Muslims somehow magically supplanting our 242 year history of a legal system based on English common law and western traditions. I am worried about the eroding separation of church and state, and people like Mike Pence and Betsy DeVoss who want to impose their religious views on all of us through legislation. We do not need to worry about the Muslim Taliban, we have our own American Taliban to be concerned about.
[A]:
Non-sexual-explicit