In this task, you are given books product reviews in English language. The goal is to classify the review as "POS" if the overall sentiment of the review is positive or as "NEG" if the overall sentiment of the review is negative.
--------
Question: A simple introduction to a complex man. . There is no better way to get into the mindset of Fellini than through his own words. This unassuming book is full of the director's  thoughts and motivations. From behind the scene anectdotes to descriptions of scenes  never filmed this is an excellent place to start learning about the movie  world's best director ever

Answer: POS


Question: Brilliant viewpoints! . Why of course the Chinese government was entirely to blame for the opium imported by the Scotsmen Jardine and Matheson!  It just like when Americans have a cocaine problem, it is the US government, and not the drug smugglers and dealers, that has the responsibility.  And if the Chinese folks got addicted to this narcotic, well, it's for their own good you know.  At least that's Herman's view.  Also, the Scots who thus created Hong Kong for the opium trade did not do all this hard work for money or for themselves.  Yes, they did make a little money but that's not why they were in China.  They imported opium in order to create Hong Kong so that one day it will become a "premier" commercial city of the Orient, with the ultimate goal of teaching China western financial and economic techniques.  If it were not for Jardine and Matheson, how could China have become a great power today, or a candidate superpower tomorrow?  No, these two far-sighted Scots had this noble, lofty goal in mind when they came to China, nothing lesss.  When historians condemn these two for their "crime" (drug-dealing, that is) they forget that they are actually heroes, as Herman sees so clearly and correctly.  And so it is completely unjust that a brilliant people like the Scots don't even have a country they can call their own while the "barbaric" and "decadent" Chinese do

Answer: NEG


Question: Looking for prolife information will not find it here. . I had to use this particular book for a class I was taking.    I was hoping for at least a balanced presentation, but I was very disappointed with this book.  I found it to have a definite anti-life view.    I found that the author minimized the role of morality in the field of bioethics.  Especially how religion contributes to moral views and how that effects bioethics.      I also found that the author tried to present Catholic Church teachings specifically without even a basic understanding of how the Church developed these views

Answer:
NEG