In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: insult and non-insult. Insult is any lanugage or act that is disrespectful or scornfully abusive.

Comment: Heck Glenn, you deleted the comment I replied to.

I do have a connection to Fiji, but it isn't as if I live there or anything.  However, I have many friends (or at least people who know me) in Savusavu.  I refuse to "search" for Gabbard's "anti-Muslim" bias.  You need to prove it to me.  I have not seen any evidence so far that it is real.  

She is against "Muslim Extremists" but then who isn't.  And the conflict between India and Pakistan hasn't been resolved all these years later.  But there is no way you can convince me that Representative Gabbard's primary goal in life is to destroy Islam.  

Again, Nuance.  The problems of the world are rarely black and white.  (unless you live in Mississippi, but that is a different subject.)
Non-insult

Comment: There actually is some relevant and thoughtful policy up for debate in the CPC leadership race (Raitt, Chong, O'Toole, Scheer), but the media is too busy creating new headlines every time O'Leary opens his mouth.
Non-insult

Comment: I agree.  If Trump were to single out a religious group qua religious group, that would be wrong.  If Trump were to oppose immigration by Mexicans on grounds of race, that would be even more wrong.  But you assume he hates both groups, and as much as I "dislike" Trump (to put it mildly), I just don't have the evidence to say he hates them, or wants to discriminate against them on the basis of religion or race. Take the travel ban.  Yes, strictly against Muslim countries.  But not ALL Muslim countries, and it affects a relatively small percentage of Muslims --- those from countries that pose the most significant threat of terrorism.  If he wanted to discriminate against Muslims qua Muslims, he did a pretty bad job of it.  And the ban is only temporary, until the people affected by it can be properly vetted.  Given the risks that terrorists pose, that's not unreasonable, not when almost every significant act of terrorism in the world is accompanied by shouts of "Allahu Akbar."

Non-insult