The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.
--------
Question: Context: 'If you need water for a medical issue the of course you can have two waters.' 'You are being very kind then, im elderly so trying to make fresh water by boiling it from getting it from a river was concerning to me. How about you take all three of the food for your kiddo's' 'That sounds fair. The kids can bathe in the stream. We are good with 2 food packs.'
Utterance: 'Lol, wish i could. Then you take all 3 of the firewood, I'll take 2 of the Water and 1 of the food, sound good?'

Answer: No


Question: Context: 'okay🙂 is it cold so you want firewood?' 'Yes, I get cold easy. Thanks a lot!' 'sure, i have a lot of people coming thats why i need food'
Utterance: 'No problems with that. I am glad we could make a deal. To summarize, you will have 3 of food and 1 of firewood while I will have 3 of water and 2 of Firewood.'

Answer: No


Question: Context: 'Hello, I really need more firewood, in exchange for me taking more of that you can have more food and we can split the water evenly 🙂' 'Hey, nice interacting with you. I'll need additional package of water as I need to cook as well.' 'ok, if i get all 3 extra firewood, I'd be fine with getting 1 extra water while you get 2? food is a really low priority for me'
Utterance: 'Same here as well as I have carried enough but yes, I need firewood as most of y food requires cooking and specially my kids prefer having food hot.'

Answer:
Yes