Given a document, an entity and its sentiment towards the entity, verify if it is the correct sentiment towards the entity. Answer should be yes or no. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Figaro is Negative . PARIS (Reuters) - Tom Enders  has told the French Presidency  he  will not seek a third mandate as chief executive of European planemaker Airbus (AIR.PA)  Le Figaro daily reports on its website.
 FILE PHOTO - Airbus Group Chief Executive Tom Enders  speaks during a news conference on the aerospace group's annual results  in London  Britain February 24  2016. REUTERS/Hannah McKay
“According to our information  the last board meeting of 2017  this Thursday  should ratify the non-renewal of  Tom Enders  at the helm of the group following the expiry of  his  mandate in May 2019 ”  the Figaro  said  without citing  its  sources.
“Tom informed the Elysee very recently he would not seek a third mandate ” a source cited by  Le Figaro  said.
no

Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Robert Mueller is Positive . Ok. Maybe something  but we don’t know exactly what. Given all that’s going on with the Russia probe and special counsel  Robert Mueller’s  deep dive into potential money laundering  this could definitely catch  his  attention.
Officials at the German bank told Manager Magazin  as reported by English-language outlets  that a review of company accounts related to the Kushner family was sent to a German bank regulator for further investigation. Information may also be released to special counsel Robert Mueller‘s federal probe.
That wasn’t necessarily related to  Mueller ’s probe.
So will  Mueller  pick this up?  He  has reportedly been looking at Trump’s transactions with the bank. It shouldn’t be a surprise to anyone if the next thing we hear is that  Mueller  is on the case.
no

Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Johnny Iuzzini is Neutral . A post shared by Johnny Iuzzini ® (@johnnyiuzzini) on Sep 24  2017 at 6:11pm PDT
Celebrity chef Johnny Iuzzini  currently a judge on “The Great American Baking Show ” says he’s “shattered and heartbroken” over recent accusations of sexual misconduct by four of his former employees.
The first woman  a pastry chef  told Mic she resigned after two years of employment at Jean-Georges  during which time  Iuzzini  would sneak up beside her and put  his  tongue in her ear — a tactic  he  repeated “three or four times.” She also said  he  would touch the employees’ rear ends with kitchen utensils or long vegetables.
A second pastry chef claims  Iuzzini  once ran up behind her and simulated a sex act on her. “He didn’t actually grind up on my butt  but his hands were on my hips ” she told Mic. “He did it for five seconds and ran out.” At the time  the chef says she didn’t think she should report the behavior  lest it ruin her career.
Two externs  who were unpaid  also reported inappropriate behavior on  Iuzzini ’s part  including his frequent requests for shoulder rubs  his penchant for crude humor  and the time he showed one of them a photo of a woman’s genitals.
One extern also says she engaged in a three-month sexual relationship with  Iuzzini  when she was 19  which began the day before she interviewed for her extern position. According to her statement to Mic  she remembers it being hard to refuse his advances. “If one person has all the power  it’s not really consent ” she said.
Two of the women who spoke to Mic believed that the management of Jean-Georges may have learned about Iuzzuni’s behavior shortly before  Iuzzini  left in 2011.  Iuzzini   however  wrote that  he  “maintains a good relationship” with  his  mentor Jean-Georges Vongerichten  and gave three months’ notice of  his  departure.
 Iuzzini  also denied that  he  suffered from a substance abuse problem  or that  he  angrily assaulted an employee with a nitrogen canister — accusations leveled against  him  by an extern and the pastry chefs  respectively — but  he  said he “takes responsibility if any of the members of my team felt uncomfortable ” even if their accusations are “inaccurate.”
Nevertheless   he  also offered an explanation for any mistakes  he  was “complicit in.”

yes