Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.

Input: Consider Input: What does the rest of the Trump cheerleading squad have to say about this?

http://www.adn.com/politics/article/donald-trump-campaign-unveils-alaska-supporters-including-treadwell-mcguire/2016/05/16/

Output: Yes


Input: Consider Input: If Democrats call anyone a name it's probably well deserved, or tit for tat, Chance.  Imagine all the name calling, lies, and ugly pictures that anti-President Obama that've been put on the Internet, and our classy, beautiful President Obama responded to many of his critics by saying, "I love you too."

Output: Yes


Input: Consider Input: Sorry Old Soul, I disagree and reality is not on the side of your argument. Women ARE the only people who can reproduce, men being only reproductive. The law is contrived and based on outmoded ideas including the institution of marriage--a throwback to the days of women being unable to own property, work outside the home, etc. 
It seems to me that with the inviolable right to abortion (currently it is a right that is routinely violated, but the US is obviously a backward country) comes the obligation for women to acknowledge that when they choose to allow a pregnancy to come to term and produce a child, they bear the sole responsibility for raising the child. Should they choose to allow another person involvement in the raising of the child, the biological father--whoever--that is their prerogative. To the extent the biological father is involved I would assume that it is contingent upon his active participation. There could be circumstances where the father parents on his own.


Output: No