Given a document, an entity and its sentiment towards the entity, verify if it is the correct sentiment towards the entity. Answer should be yes or no. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

[Q]: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Larry Wooten is Neutral . Navarroâs decision apparently was a reflection on federal officials. It follows release of a memo by  BLM investigator Larry Wooten  that described âa widespread pattern of bad judgment  lack of discipline  incredible bias  unprofessionalism and misconduct  as well as likely policy  ethical and legal violations among senior and supervisory staffâ in the BLMâs Office of Law Enforcement and Security.
 Wooten  wrote that  he  had seen âexcessive force â described officers grinding Bundyâs son Daveâs face in gravel and opined that federal officials were intent on commanding âthe most intrusive  oppressive  large scale and militaristic cattle impound possible.â
In an apparently partisan reference that used a term Hillary Clinton designated for some of Trumpâs supporters   Wooten  wrote that a federal prosecutor said  letâs get these âshall we say Deplorables.â
 Wooten  also wrote that the Bundy case âclosely mirrorsâ the circumstances behind the trial of former Sen. Ted Stevens  R-Alaska.
 Wooten  is no fan of Cliven Bundy who   he  wrote  instead of âproperly using the court system or other avenues to properly address  his  grievances   he  chose an illegal  uncivilized and dangerous strategy in which a tragedy was narrowly and thankfully avoided.â
[A]: yes


[Q]: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Clinton is Negative . NEW YORK (AP)  â Hillary Clinton  says  she  should not have let a senior campaign adviser keep  his  job after a female staffer accused  him  of sexual harassment in 2007.
"The most important work of my life has been to support and empower women  " Clinton  wrote on Facebook Tuesday night . "So I very much understand the question I'm being asked as to why I let an employee on my 2008 campaign keep his job despite his inappropriate workplace behavior. The short answer is this: If I had it to do again  I wouldn't."
 Clinton  said that senior campaign staff and legal counsel confirmed that the behavior by faith-based adviser Burns Strider had occurred after the woman came forward. Her campaign manager recommended that Strider be terminated  but  Clinton  said  she  instead demoted him  docked his pay  required counseling  separated him from the victim  and warned him that he'd be fired if he did it again.
 Clinton  said that there were no further complaints against Strider during the rest of the campaign  but that  she  is troubled that  he  was terminated from a job leading an independent political action committee supporting  Clinton  for inappropriate behavior several years later.
"I believed the punishment was severe and the message to  him  unambiguous. I also believe in second chances "  Clinton  said in the post published shortly before the start of President Donald Trump's State of the Union address. "But sometimes they're squandered."
 She  said that the reoccurrence of the behavior "troubles me greatly" and leads  her  to question whether it would have been better if  she  had fired him.
"There is no way I can go back 10 years and know the answers. But you can bet I'm asking  myself  these questions right now."
 Clinton  said that  her  first thought after the Times report "was for the young woman involved" and that she reached out to her "to see how she was doing  but also to help me reflect on my decision and its consequences."
"She expressed appreciation that she worked on a campaign where she knew she could come forward without fear "  Clinton  said. " She  was glad that her accusations were taken seriously  that there was a clear process in place for dealing with harassment  and that it was followed. Most importantly   she  told me that for the remainder of the campaign  she flourished in her new role. "
[A]: no


[Q]: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Alexei Navalny is Positive . MOSCOW (Reuters) - Russian opposition leader Alexei Navalny was barred on Monday from running in next year’s presidential election after officials ruled he was ineligible to take part due to a suspended prison sentence he says was trumped up.
The decision by the central election commission was widely expected as election officials had repeatedly declared  Navalny  would be ineligible to run. Twelve members of the 13-member commission voted to bar  Navalny . One member abstained  citing a possible conflict of interest.
 Navalny   41  who polls show would struggle to beat incumbent Vladimir Putin in the March election  said he would appeal and called on his supporters to boycott the election and campaign against it being held.
“We knew this could happen  and so we have a straight-forward  clear plan ”  Navalny  said in a pre-recorded video released immediately after the decision.
 Navalny  said  he  would use  his  campaign headquarters across Russia to support the boycott and monitor turnout on voting day  March 18.
Polls show Putin  65  who has dominated Russia’s political landscape for the last 17 years  is on course to be comfortably re-elected  making  him  eligible to serve another six years until 2024  when  he  turns 72.
 Navalny  says Putin’s support is exaggerated and artificially maintained by a biased state media and an unfair system. He says he could defeat him in a fair election  an assertion Putin’s supporters have said is laughable.
‘DO  THE RIGHT THING’
Russian opposition leader Alexei Navalny  speaks to the media after submitting  his  documents to be registered as a presidential candidate at the Central Election Commission in Moscow  Russia December 24  2017. REUTERS/Tatyana Makeyeva
Before the commission voted   Navalny   dressed in a dark suit  had demanded  he  be allowed to take part in the election delivering a speech that angered election officials.
In one heated exchange   he  said Russian voters’ faith in the system hung in the balance.
“If you do not allow me to run  you are taking a decision against millions of people who are demanding that  Navalny  take part ”  he  said  referring to  himself  in the first person.
“You are not robots  you are living  breathing human beings you are an independent body ... for once in your lives  do the right thing ”  he  said.
 His  supporters clapped  him   but officials were unmoved.
Ebzeev said there could not be “the slightest doubt” that  Navalny  was ineligible to run  a reference to Russia’s constitution that bars him running because of his suspended sentence relating to an embezzlement case.
 Navalny  has repeatedly denied any wrongdoing  and says the case is politically motivated.
[A]:
yes