The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.

[EX Q]: Context: 'Hi there!' 'hello !🙂' 'What are your preferences?'
Utterance: 'I am about to go on a charity event with a kid from the make a wish foundation, I would like to get some firewood and maybe some food for his trip so he wont be cold and hungry at least.'
[EX A]: Yes

[EX Q]: Context: 'I am doing quite good. I enjoy camping. I however did not bring enough food.' 'Ok I'm sure we can work it out because I know I need extra water and firewood. Do you have any ideas on how to divvy up the extra supplies?' 'I would need some firewood as well, as I need it to cook the food. I was thinking maybe you can have all the water and I have all the food.'
Utterance: 'All the food is too much, I would need at least one package of the food for my group. I was thinking you could have 2 of the food packages and I have 1, then I get all the water and the majority of the firewood. That leaves you with 2 of the high priority food packages and a package of firewood to cook the food.'
[EX A]: Yes

[EX Q]: Context: 'Yes that is totally fine with me. What about firewood' 'I can give you 1 of the firewood. I would like to stay warm at night so I want 2. 😮' 'Hmm that's going to be hard for me because I also get cold. what other reasons do you have?'
Utterance: 'I like to have a big fire so that I can feel good at night. I can get lonely at night. ☹️'
[EX A]:
No