In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

Ex Input:
Sentence: We went to the lake, because a shark had been seen at the ocean beach, so it was a safer place to swim.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the lake because we went there on a Saturday evening, but that is all I can think of. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

Ex Output:
Wrong


Ex Input:
Sentence: They broadcast an announcement, but a subway came into the  station and I couldn't hear over it .
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the subway because the 'it' is the "it" that is likely to be the cause of the subway. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

Ex Output:
Wrong


Ex Input:
Sentence: The path to the lake was blocked, so we couldn't use it .
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the path because it runs through a large portion of the game, and is likely to be the final path we use. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

Ex Output:

Wrong