In this task, you will be shown a sentence, and you should determine whether it is overruling or non-overruling. In law, an overruling sentence is a statement that nullifies a previous case decision as a precedent by a constitutionally valid statute or a decision by the same or higher ranking court which establishes a different rule on the point of law involved. Classify your answers into overruling or non-overruling

Q: we think that his analysis of peerless roll leaf co. v. griffin sons, was altogether correct, and that he had no alternative but to follow that decision; on the other hand, we now think that we were then wrong and that the decision must be overruled for reasons we shall state.

A: overruling
****
Q: we hereby disapprove of merendino v. burrell, 923 s.w.2d 258, 261 (tex. app.  beaumont 1996, writ denied), and miller v. cozart, 394 s.w.2d 22, 24 (tex.civ.app.  dallas 1965, no writ), to the extent that they hold that a person who owns or is otherwise responsible for horses has a duty to prevent the horses from roaming onto a farm-to-market road that is free from a local stock law.

A: overruling
****
Q: there is a rational connection between its impoundments of prison legal news based on the magazine's ad content and prison security and public safety interests.

A:
non-overruling
****