In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Example Input: Comment: The problem is really the accreditation of foreign trained physicians and specialists.     This has nothing to do with the current Govt and has existed for years.       

It's actually quite ridiculous that a foreign specialist educated and trained eg:  At the University of Edinburgh (unquestionably a top rated school), who did a foreign residency cannot practice in Canada unless they complete a Canadian residency.   But the number of residency positions is capped and many are taken by Canadians who studied abroad and returned to complete their residency in Canada.    Worse - when they complete their residency, they are free to leave, no strings attached.
Example Output: Non-obscene

Example Input: Comment: I wonder what old white guys think is worse, having a black president or woman president.  Up here in the chow halls it's been 7 plus years of its obamas fault that they are all neutered toothless hillbillies.  It will be interesting to see and hear how they cry if a woman is elected president.  A curious phenomenon occurs every time a black man walks in the chow hall, the loud crying about Obama stops.  All loud and proud as long as no minorities are around.
Example Output: Non-obscene

Example Input: Comment: President Schill. Corporate YES man. It was a HALLOWEEN costume for Pete's sake. And a darn good one. Why all the damn drama? This entire fiasco is a TOTAL waste of time and energy.
Example Output:
Obscene