Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.

[EX Q]: I think the world's most profitable companies should pitch in and buy the LIO for the legislature as a "thank you" gift, for SB21, ACES, the PPT, and other giveaways over the last 20 years or so.  They could give it to the state of Alaska as a whole, so it wouldn't technically be bribery---And it'd be giving something back, after many years of dedication on the part of the legislature.

Conocophillips, BP, Exxonmobile---What about it?  Are you going to let your lapdogs hang, or come to their rescue and save us all a lot of embarrassment?
[EX A]: Yes

[EX Q]: That Bernie will take your hard earned stuff and give it to some ne'r do well is a misnomer....you're gonna pay taxes, right?... And your legitimate earnings came to you with public infrastructure, right?... What Bernie propses is to redirect where that tax income comes from... And more importantly, where it goes....if you think deeper than bumper stickers he's got some decent ideas... That don't entail  taking from you and giving it to people you don't like....
[EX A]: No

[EX Q]: Fingernails growing on a dead man. We are not the kind of people who build bridges or much of anything else. The people that  were are dead or dying.  Looking at similar big projects across the nation like the New San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge and Boston's Big Dig fiascos, I seriously doubt the engineering and construction skills necessary for such a project could be found in the United States anyway.
[EX A]:
No