In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.
--------
Question: Comment: I'll never forget watching a Johnny Carson show in the early 60's that featured Palmers first wife. Carson asked her if she did anything special before one of Arnold's tournaments and she said, "I kiss his balls". Carson's reply? "I'll bet that makes his putter rise!"

RIP, great one.

Answer: Sexual-explicit


Question: Comment: Trid sees nothing wrong with "No Dogs or Jews", "We don't serve Muslims" and so on. He supports bigotry. And no, that is NOT a straw man, but the clear and obvious implication of your " If either the buyer or the seller does not want to enter into that contract for whatever reason then I believe they have the right to refuse." Thank you for proving that your claim to being a Christian is a complete sham.

Answer: Non-sexual-explicit


Question: Comment: You're blaming the system when the actual censorship is coming from users.   I myself have had 3 posts banned, for no other reason than that they called out other users for their blatant hypocrisy (joe dick, I'm talking about you...).

To simply over-ride this, just click "yes" as your personal matter of practice.   If everybody did this, there would be NO censorship.

Testing.... TESTING:   

As George Carlin said of the 7 words you can't say on TV:

"Shit, piss, fuck, cunt, cocksucker, motherfucker and..... tits"

Ironically, now you CAN say these words on TV (just not network TV).    But you should be able to say it on a forum like this, so long as people cooperate.

Of course, this post will be gone in 3.... 2.....1.....

Answer:
Sexual-explicit