In this task, You are given a review of Amazon's food products. Your task is to divide them into two classes: negative or positive, depending on the content of the review.

Input: Consider Input: so, this thing is like a big fat crochet hook designed to grab the inside lip of the jacuzzi ball and pull. Which would be great, except that it's ONE QUARTER INCH TOO SHORT. Maybe Kohler changed their design to make it deeper, or something, but this tool is next to USELESS for removing jets from my tub. Instead of the ball lip, all you can "grab" is the sloped ledge inside the ball, which with a LOT of persistence and side pressure might eventually get the insert to let go. We finally "modified" the tool by melting portions of the stop-ball away, making it more functional and much less pretty. Caveat Emptor.

Output: negative


Input: Consider Input: This rack arrived so twisted/bent that it can not be assembled. I wanted it for an upcoming trip but I will not have enough time to return it, wait for the new one to arrive before my trip. Absolutely useless junk with no QC. I will just return this item and go to a local business to get one. Thanks for wasting my time.

Output: negative


Input: Consider Input: I can't imagine how anybody would give this thing a 5 star review, it was terrible. Even at the lowest resolution setting the refresh rate of the video is about every three seconds. It's very fiddly to get the picture to focus and having to weight a few seconds after each adjustment makes for a very long and frustrating process. If you increase the resolution of the picture the refresh rate lengthens exponentially. I'm guessing that every previous reviewer was paid by the company to write each glowing review. I disagree totally with all of them. I returning this cheap chinese junk.


Output: negative