In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Comment: Douglas Saunders is right about one thing.  Blacks are better off under Obama. Where else in the world can a single Black woman have six children from six different "Baby Daddies" and collect $60,000 in cash cards and housing benefits annually, free medical care for her family, pay no taxes, doesn't even have to look for work let alone work, and when her children are in school they get two or three free meals a day, and free meals even in some states during summer vacation. And the "Baby Daddies" don't have to pay child support. Life is good in the hood.
Non-sexual-explicit

Comment: Better yet just get your money the fok outta Canada.

The dick in Ottawa only cres about foreighners anyway
Sexual-explicit

Comment: "...when the money that used to be available to pay them (state employees) is gone."   

Meanwhile, Meyer (R-CONoco) doesn't hesitate to take the daily per diem, health benefits and other percs he gets for being the ringmaster of upheaval of people's lives ("friends and neighbors") and furthering Alaska's advance into bankruptcy.  You and your Imperial cronies are shameless.

Non-sexual-explicit