In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

[Q]: Comment: FM:  If you dislike dishonesty don't look in a mirror.
[A]: Non-obscene


[Q]: Comment: Kick ass! You give me hope with your little finger.
[A]: Obscene


[Q]: Comment: Truly amusing seeing yet another G&M smear piece.  The paper published what - 100, 200, 300 - hit pieces on Trump, with nary a story on Hillary's pay to play, Benghazi, email server etc.  G&M was 100% wrong on the election.  Imagine that.  100% wrong.  Their job is to inform people, yet they were 100% wrong.  And Breitbart:  was it also 100% wrong?  They nailed the election.  So, when we talk about who was misleading the public, and who was factual, it was the far-left G&M editorial writers who were both wrong and intentionally misleading, and Breitbart that was correct and honest.  

Like the left wing American media, the G&M should hang its head in shame and offer an apology to its (few remaining) readers.
[A]:
Non-obscene