The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.

Context: 'Fine.' 'You aren't very talkative are you? What preferences do you have for packages?😮😮😮' 'I would really like 2 water and 2 firewood and 1 food.'
Utterance: 'I would like 3 water no firewood and 2 food. I have 8 people in my family and I have a medical condition where I can only drink water and have to drink 100 ounces per day.'
Yes

Context: 'Hello, I'm excited for our camping trip!' 'Hey buddy, yes I'm so pumped for it.' 'Okay so I'm planning this super cool backpacking expedition up the waterfall but I'm going to need all the additional water and food for everyone.'
Utterance: 'All of the additional water and food? That doesn't seem very fair. ☹️'
No

Context: 'Hello, what are your preferences for extra supplies?  I am greatly in need of food and water.  We will be doing a lot of activity in a hot, dry climate.🙂' 'I prefer firewood because I will get cold at night. I forgot blankets ☹️'
Utterance: 'Would it work for you, then, to give me the three food and three water, and I can give you all of the firewood?'

No