The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.

Input: Consider Input: Context: 'Hmmm i don't beleive i ever offered you everything for all the food. I will need at least one water. lets not be selfish.' 'Oh you are right sorry, I was mistaken.  Okay then, how about I get 1 food, 2 waters, and 3 firewood.  You can have 2 food and 1 water?' 'Well that would give you 6 rations and me 3. Again that is not very fair. If you want 1 food and all the fire wood that i need at least 2 waters. so again, 1 food, 1 water 3 wood for you'
Utterance: 'Okay, you have a deal. 🙂'

Output: No


Input: Consider Input: Context: 'Hi, what is your highest priority item?'
Utterance: 'I would love to have extra food for my trip, bringing the family! how about you?'

Output: Yes


Input: Consider Input: Context: 'Hello, I'm in a strong need for food and water. Please let me have a few packages of food and water. I'd gladly trade all my firewood for it.' 'Hello. Wow! That does not sound good. My sister just called and let me know she will be coming tonight. She is bringing food so i have plenty to share. 🙂' 'That's some good news. 🙂 Are you sure she is going to be bringing food with her?'
Utterance: 'Yea She is bring tons of food. So don't worry we have plenty of food to spare. 🙂 She did forget to get water. I didn't know she was coming so i didn't grab any and I forgot the 3 packages of water for myself at the store. ☹️'


Output: Yes