In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

Q: Sentence: I took the water bottle out of the backpack so that it would be lighter.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the backpack because it was the closest thing to a backpack I could find. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

A: Wrong
****
Q: Sentence: As Andrea in the crop duster passed over Susan, she could see the landing strip.
 Reason: The 'she' refers to andrea because she is the only one of the three to not have an official name. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

A: Correct
****
Q: Sentence: Sam broke both his ankles and he's walking with crutches. But a month or so from now they should be unnecessary.
 Reason: The 'they' refers to the crutches because they are the first thing a person needs once they're hurt. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

A:
Wrong
****