In this task, you are given a part of an article. Your task is to generate headline (title) for this text. Preferred headlines are under fifteen words.

[EX Q]: In this paper we present the greedy step averaging(GSA) method, a parameter-free stochastic optimization algorithm for a variety of machine learning problems. As a gradient-based optimization method, GSA makes use of the information from the minimizer of a single sample’s loss function, and takes average strategy to calculate reasonable learning rate sequence. While most existing gradient-based algorithms introduce an increasing number of hyper parameters or try to make a trade-off between computational cost and convergence rate, GSA avoids the manual tuning of learning rate and brings in no more hyper parameters or extra cost. We perform exhaustive numerical experiments for logistic and softmax regression to compare our method with the other state of the art ones on 16 datasets. Results show that GSA is robust on various scenarios.
[EX A]: Greedy Step Averaging: A parameter-free stochastic optimization method

[EX Q]: Dawid, Kjrerulff & Lauritzen (1994) provided a preliminary description of a hybrid between Monte-Carlo sampling methods and exact lo­ cal computations in junction trees. Utiliz­ ing the strengths of both methods, such hy­ brid inference methods has the potential of expanding the class of problems which can be solved under bounded resources as well as solving problems which otherwise resist ex­ act solutions. The paper provides a detailed description of a particular instance of such a hybrid scheme; namely, combination of ex­ act inference and Gibbs sampling in discrete Bayesian networks. We argue that this com­ bination calls for an extension of the usual message passing scheme of ordinary junction trees.
[EX A]: HUGS: Combining Exact Inference and Gibbs Sampling in Junction Trees

[EX Q]: The ability to know in advance the trend of running process instances, with respect to different features, such as the expected completion time, would allow business managers to timely counteract to undesired situations, in order to prevent losses. Therefore, the ability to accurately predict future features of running business process instances would be a very helpful aid when managing processes, especially under service level agreement constraints. However, making such accurate forecasts is not easy: many factors may influence the predicted features. Many approaches have been proposed to cope with this problem but all of them assume that the underling process is stationary. However, in real cases this assumption is not always true. In this work we present new methods for predicting the remaining time of running cases. In particular we propose a method, assuming process stationarity, which outperforms the state-of-the-art and two other methods which are able to make predictions even with nonstationary processes. We also describe an approach able to predict the full sequence of activities that a running case is going to take. All these methods are extensively evaluated on two real case studies.
[EX A]:
Time and Activity Sequence Prediction of Business Process Instances