Given two noun phrases (arguments) and relationship between them, form a sentence that expresses theses arguments with the given relationship.

Q: Relationship: 'go to', Argument/Subject 1: 'kerry', Argument/Subject 2: 'vietnam'

A: 9:25 -- Kerry goes to the Vietnam thing again in the closing .
****
Q: Relationship: 'be messenger of', Argument/Subject 1: 'jesus', Argument/Subject 2: 'god'

A: Jesus was God 's messenger .
****
Q: Relationship: 'be head of', Argument/Subject 1: 'paulson', Argument/Subject 2: 'goldman sach'

A:
It is ironic indeed that US Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson , a former head of Goldman Sachs , a firm that exemplifies financial triumphalism , is spearheading the effort to save government-sponsored behemoths that have so conspicuously outlived their usefulness .
****