In this task, you're given a statement, and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence clearly disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3' corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.

[EX Q]: Statement: Therefore, the National Energy Plan recommended that the Administration's approach include appropriate measures to address local concerns, such as the unlikely occurrence of an SO2 hot spot or area of concentrated emissions. Choices:  1. The National Energy Plan recommended that the Administration's address the unlikely occurrence of an SO2 hot spot or area of concentrated emissions. 2. The National Energy Plan did not have any recommendations for the Administration's approach to address local concerns. 3. The occurrence of an SO2 hot spot or area of concentrated emissions in unlikely but highly dangerous.
[EX A]: 2

[EX Q]: Statement: Opponents said reformers shouldn't jump the gun, since 1) the decision did not deal with soft money; and 2) the court refused to overturn its 1976 decision that campaign spending limits do impede free speech. Choices:  1. Opponents and reformers should act immediately without any other consideration. 2. Opponents and reformers should not act prematurely without considering all of the factors.  3. Opponents and reformers should not act with too much haste without considering hard money.
[EX A]: 1

[EX Q]: Statement: you know if everybody's trying to incorporate a little bit of it into into their school and they made sure they pointed it out you know Choices:  1. If all of the people are trying to incorporate a little bit of it into their school. 2. Nobody should incorporate that into their school. 3. If all of the people are trying to incorporate a little bit of it into their school then everything would be better.
[EX A]:
2