In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine the neutral choice based on your inference from the statement and your commonsense knowledge. The neutral choice is a sentence that neither agrees nor disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3', corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence. If sentence X agrees with sentence Y, one's correctness follows from the other one. If sentence X disagrees with sentence Y, they can not be correct at the same time.

Ex Input:
Statement: Of the 700,000 to 1 million people who are eligible for legal aid services in his combined area, Dudovitz estimated that he will serve more than 30,000 annually. Choices: 1. Dudovitz will serve over 30,000 people eligible for legal aid services in his area annually.   2. Dudovitz serves over 50,000 people eligible for legal aid services in his area annually. 3. The people eligible for legal aid services in Dudovitz's area that won't be served him will be served by others like him.

Ex Output:
3


Ex Input:
Statement: (Well, for Skadden it's not such a mystery, considering that Slate is part of the name of the D.C. law firm Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher &amp; Flom.) Choices: 1. Slate is part of a law office's name. 2. Slate is not related to the law firm it shares a name with. 3. Slate is just a law firm.

Ex Output:
2


Ex Input:
Statement: The appropriations language that regulates the scope of representation that may be provided by LSC recipients to aliens provides  Choices: 1. LSC recipients are banned from providing representation to aliens. 2. LSC recipients provide representation to aliens from a sense of compassion and duty. 3. The scope of representation that may be provided by LSC recipients to aliens is regulated by a particular appropriations language.

Ex Output:

2