In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Ex Input:
Comment: Hogwash Gary - You cannot have your cake and eat it too. That is what I disrespect most about evolutionists, is the hypocrisy. If you are going to live by the sword, you must die by it. At least have the courage to admit and accept it. And why is sexual violence any more unacceptable that violence, the fact is you have no foundation as a Darwinist to condemn anything of this nature. If you are going to travel down this road, then you MUST defend animals we eat, and every other act of "violence" that imposes an outside will upon another being. I can discuss any topic rationally with any person, but hypocrisy is something I will not deal with.

Ex Output:
Non-sexual-explicit


Ex Input:
Comment: I will NEVER watch again!!!!!!!     Roger Goodell  YOU are an ASS!!!!

Ex Output:
Sexual-explicit


Ex Input:
Comment: Let's see:  Did Clinton dream about having sex with underage girls? Nope. Did he walk in unannounced on naked teenage girls in their dressing rooms? Nope. Did he repeatedly walk unannounced into the dressing rooms of adult beauty pageant attendees? Nope. Did he brag about sexually assaulting women and "pussy grabbing?"  Nope. 
Did he routinely try to force himself on women? Nope. Did he rape his wife? Nope. 
Have he and his wife been routinely demonized for the past 30+ years while Republican pedophiles, rapists, sexual abusers and a variety of hypocritical conservative perverts got away scot free?  Oh yes.

Ex Output:

Sexual-explicit