Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.

Example Input: Good point, it would be more tax efficient to just keep the money.  I prefer a sales tax though, it collects money from people who come up for the summer and take the money they make away.  I also believe that our subsidies are too generous, when you can make more than 100% of the cost of a dry hole, there is no incentive to spend wisely.  And we aren't getting a return on that investment directly.  If we invest in a well, we should get some of the profit.
Example Output: No

Example Input: You are a paragon of tolerance, Springstuckian.
Example Output: No

Example Input: Corrections: (1) Those claiming the Messiah's "tolerance" for homosexuality argue based on a negative.  What he SAID was: "Think not that I come to destroy the Law" (Torah) "nor the Prophets" (books of Exekiel, Isaiah, etc.), "I come not to destroy, but to fulfill.  Until heaven and earth pass away" (look around, they're still here) "one yot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the Law, until all as been fulfilled.  He who breaks the least of these commandments, or teaches others to do so, shall be called least in the Kingdom of Heaven."  Homosexuality is explicitly prohibited in the Torah, which I'm told is CHRISTIAN as well as Jewish Scripture.

(2) All kinds of things contrary to authentic Islamic tenets occur in the middle east.  While Qur'an likewise prohibits and denounces homosexuality, it doesn't differentiate between that and any other form of unsanctioned sexual behavior by unmarried persons--for which the punishment, per Qur'an isn't death, but (non-lethal) flogging.
Example Output:
Yes