In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

[EX Q]: Comment: Hilarious. Or would be if it wasn't so scary. Right up there with Pope Gregory's women are good for ----ing and motherhood.
[EX A]: Sexual-explicit

[EX Q]: Comment: You don't seem to be a person I care to spend much time on. 

You do know, don't you, that young Hillary was a staff attorney for the House Judiciary Committee? 

Mostly undistinguished, but some claim she was unethical even then.

It's nice you can laugh at your own ignorance. Enjoy.
[EX A]: Non-sexual-explicit

[EX Q]: Comment: The folks who voted for Trump would not be violently protesting if that is what you seem to be projecting. You are right, both Clinton and Obama showed some class, Harry Reid showed the extreme side of the dem. party, and he is a shining example of what the folks have had enough of. Do you still just not get it? Are you and others here so indoctrinated you just cannot see the truth? What a sad and violent party the dems. are. Throwing temper tantrums when you don't get your way. You on the left who will not condemn the violence are indeed a part of the problem even if you are  not actively participating. You folks do realize, or maybe not because some on the left just don't seem able to think critically but those idiots destroying property, those idiots hurting innocent folks, they are doing even more harm to your party.
[EX A]:
Non-sexual-explicit