Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.

Q: Boy, I seem to have gotten under your skin. No one is buying your pathetic attempt to tar my motives. My track record is too well known as a PITA of bad developers. You need to go lie down and let your heart rate come back to normal. Then read my piece again as a _true_ example of citing documented facts. You could learn a few things. -- Paul

A: No
****
Q: I have to say I'm a little sorry to see Christie go. At least he called out Marco "Robo" Rubio before quitting the race; that was a fun moment (for everyone but Rubio).

A: No
****
Q: There you go again. You always resort to shameless lying. When local folks fed up with this problem called out Piercy and the city council Piercy called them cowards who are out of touch with the homeless problem. Four years later she admitted she lied, and made a distinction between homelessness and "travelers" and called for solutions to the criminal vagrancy problem. Why do you always troll the boards with shameless lies Old Soul?

A:
Yes
****