instruction:
The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.
question:
Context: 'Sure then. You can take all the food. It's not really a priority to me. ' 'Great. So if I have three food and one water, you can have three firewood and two water. Would that work for your trip?' 'That's perfect for my camping trip. '
Utterance: 'Great! Let's make a deal!'
answer:
No


question:
Context: 'Oh, that does change things a lot. Diabetes is a hard disease to have to deal with. So you want more firewood than water? And less food than water?' 'Well, I don't know.  I think I would like more water than firewood, but yes less food than water.  I'm a pretty easy going person though! 🙂' 'Ok, let me know what you think and we will go from there. I do prefer more food and firewood than water though.'
Utterance: 'Okay, it sounds like we are pretty agreeable here.  I will wait for you to make an offer if you would like to.'
answer:
No


question:
Context: 'awesome! I love the rockies. So let's try and divy up our extra supplies then. Personally, I feel that I'd need the most extra food, as I'm a rather large guy and plan to go hiking a lot during this time. Firewood would be nice, so I could have a big bonfire. What are your prefernces? ' 'i need food the most since there will be my kids and I. I can give up my firewood for food' 'Okay, so how about I get 1 food, and 3 firewood and 1 water, and you get 2 food, 0 firewood, and 2 water'
Utterance: 'sounds great'
answer:

No