The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the self-need strategy, otherwise output No. self-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to create a personal need for an item in the negotiation, such as by pointing out that the participant sweats a lot to show preference towards water packages.

Context: 'Great thank you. I am looking for primarily some firewood and food for my camping trip soon. ' 'I'm going camping too and also need food and wood, mostly food though' 'Okay I understand that! Is there a particular reason that you do not need much water?'
Utterance: 'I figure I could always get some at the stream 🙂'
No

Context: 'I would be interested in firewood.  Can I ask you, what are your primary concerns on this trip?' 'My primary concerns are staying hydrated, I have been feeling sick and throwing up from being so high up in the mountains. ' 'Oh, so sorry to hear that.  I can understand why water would be important to you.  I am worried about being too cold at night. My sleeping bag is not rated well for cold weather (I packed the wring one).'
Utterance: 'Oh I understand that for sure. I am not used to the cold weather either which is not helping. Would you be interested in a trade for water in exchange for firewood? '
Yes

Context: 'Hey, that's great. Good to hear definitely. I am also looking forward to build some campfires and enjoy some s'mores!' 'Thats great! Would it be okay if I got 2 packages of firewood, and 1 each of the food and water?' 'I would've like to have 2 packages of firewood instead. How about I give you all the extra water packages?'
Utterance: 'Well for a compromise I will give you the 2 packages of firewood, if I got 1 firewood, 2 food, and 3 waters. 🙂'

No