In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.
--------
Question: Comment: You seem to ignore the facts. There were 32,000 terrorist attacks by muslims against the rest of the world in the last 15 years.  And even the Quebec mosque murders was not a terrorist attack.  How many buddhist attacks have you seen? Or even christian attacks?  To my knowledge the number is 0.  With such a high number of attacks by one single religion,  you really expect that muslims will be perceived in a good light?  Many times we deal with people, we dont even know their religion. It's never written on their foreheads.  So people like you instead of playing the offended should concede that there is a huge problem with islam.  And you should sympathize with anyone who is against this violence, and this hate against the rest of the world by muslims.  We need protection from muslims since they have showed how dangerous they are.

Answer: Non-obscene


Question: Comment: Do you see the paradox?  Gun people always scream about mental health...whenever tragedy occurs, we hear how it has absolutely nothing to do with the availability of guns and everything to do with mental health.  Then when people try to get at those mental health concerns before a tragedy - that gets decried as well.  Damned if you do, damned if you don't I guess.

Answer: Obscene


Question: Comment: LOL... this pussy on the head thing  is totally Freudian.   I don't recall women protesting when Slick Willy put a cigar in Monica Lewinsky.  Wat up wit dat?

Answer:
Obscene