In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine the neutral choice based on your inference from the statement and your commonsense knowledge. The neutral choice is a sentence that neither agrees nor disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3', corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence. If sentence X agrees with sentence Y, one's correctness follows from the other one. If sentence X disagrees with sentence Y, they can not be correct at the same time.

Example Input: Statement: (Well, for Skadden it's not such a mystery, considering that Slate is part of the name of the D.C. law firm Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher &amp; Flom.) Choices: 1. Slate is part of a law office's name. 2. Slate is not related to the law firm it shares a name with. 3. Slate is just a law firm.
Example Output: 2

Example Input: Statement: A huge winged statue of the archangel Michael crowns its facade. Choices: 1. There is no such thing as angels. 2. There is a massive winged statue of Micheal the archangel. 3. Micheal was the one and only archangel.
Example Output: 3

Example Input: Statement: If anything, their book only makes things worse, says Orville Schell in the New York Times : Bernstein and Munro have unrepentantly plunged harpoons into the tenderest interstices of the Chinese-American relationship. Choices: 1. Munro supported the Chinese-American relationship through their book. 2. Bernstein had shorted several stocks before publishing their book. 3. Their book has only served to make the Chinese-American relationship worse.
Example Output:
2