In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.
--------
Question: Sentence: Sam pulled up a chair to the piano, but it was broken, so he had to sing instead.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the piano because it was broken, so he had to stand instead but  Sam pulled up a chair to the piano. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

Answer: Wrong


Question: Sentence: The path to the lake was blocked, so we couldn't use it .
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the path because it runs through a large portion of the game, and is likely to be the final path we use. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

Answer: Wrong


Question: Sentence: John hired himself out to Bill to take care of him .
 Reason: The 'him' refers to bill because it's obvious that he's the one who's going to be paying him. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

Answer:
Wrong