We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Example Input: The guy who is a boxer who is watching was not looking for the knockout.
Example Output: Invalid

Example Input: Just because the Chicago Tribune finds some "expert" in the field of arson investigation who examines paper evidence and says their may be cause for doubt does not mean that the man was innocent.
Example Output: Invalid

Example Input: We cannot force our belief in a right we enjoy onto people that only exist at the discretion of a government and not God.
Example Output:
Invalid