We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Example Input: Sent1: In other words the Miller case interpreted the Second Amendment to mean one has the right to own militia type weapons.
 Sent2: In the Miller case, the court essentially ruled that the second ammendment does indeed convey an individual right, but that the right in question is dependant on the type of weapon (i.e must be suitable for military use).
Example Output: Similar

Example Input: Sent1: In England, where currently the private ownership of hand guns by the law abiding is absolutely prohibited, crimes involving the use of guns are rapidly increasing: only the criminals have access to them.
 Sent2: By that brand of logic, any gun law is specifically aimed at reducing criminal use of guns, including a complete ban.
Example Output: Not similar

Example Input: Sent1: Ian brought up the point that guns make you more likely to kill a person.
 Sent2: The fact that you've committed murder is irrelevant and the only thing that matters is if a person has a gun?
Example Output:
Not similar