We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.
--------
Question: New proposals invariable seek to criminalize possession by the public, possession which is perfectly lawful and harms no one, creating victimless crimes, and malum prohibitum laws that reduce freedom.

Answer: Valid


Question: Could you legally produce weapons of mass destruction in your own back yard "without asking" for permission?

Answer: Valid


Question: The figures for the number of gun related deaths in the US should be evidence enough that 'the people' cannot be trusted with guns.

Answer:
Valid