We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Input: Consider Input: I'm not against the notion that the worst criminals deserve the worst punishment, but No for 2 reasons.

Output: Valid


Input: Consider Input: While criminal trials not involving the death penalty can also involve mistakes, there is at least the opportunity for those mistakes to be corrected.

Output: Valid


Input: Consider Input: My argument makes it clear that innocent people need not be sentenced to death in order for the death penalty to be unjust.


Output: Valid