In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Q: Comment: DOJ should open an investigation into James Comey misconduct while FBI Director. That would put his incompetence and self serving bias out there and help get the public behind his firing. House of Reps will not vote for impeachment if it hurts the re-election campaigns of the members.

A: Non-obscene
****
Q: Comment: If the author  had any appreciation of multiculturalism, he would understand that people of different languages and culture have difficulties with names with different spelling constructs and pronunciations. The author thinks multiculturalism is for him to receive as a birthright for not having been born white, and  that it is beneath his own dignity to extend multiculturalism tolerance to others of different races and cultural backgrounds.  He makes a poor example of what a Canadian ought to be.

A: Non-obscene
****
Q: Comment: That's a nice story, except that it's not true.  I was very surprised when I heard Kershaw wasn't starting.  Like I said, Darvish looked like crap in game 3, and his eyes looked lost.  No way I would have started him in a game 7 with Kershaw available.  And again, the metrics on Darvish vs. the Astros are pretty astounding.  Frankly, I wouldn't even have put Darvish on the roster for the WS, given his history with the Astros.

A:
Obscene
****