In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: threat and non-threat. Threat is a statement that someone will be hurt or harmed, especially if the person does not do something in particular.
--------
Question: Comment: That's because you are a blind ignorant fool who is incapable of grasping simple facts. I have given you several examples of how they discriminate against 98% of our local small business community, and yet that fact confuses the dickens out of you.  I have explained in detail how they strip vendors of our rights to partake in ALL legal commerce we paid our government for the right to freely partake of. You are incapable of grasping this simple fact no matter how many times it is explained to you.

Answer: Non-threat


Question: Comment: “absolutely, racism has played a role” says Meredith.

Another, perfect example of his unsuitability to sit in the Senate and be part of our Parliament. As clear cut a case of unethical behavior, that included grooming a teenager for sexual purposes, as there can be. And he wants to play the race card. At least his new lawyer is smart enough to not go there. 

What an immoral, self serving man. Revolting!

Answer: Non-threat


Question: Comment: I looked over your list. I really doubt many of the authors would appreciate their research being used to claim that we're not altering the climate system.

Lots of mathturbation exercises, too, mainly curve-fitting and imaginary "cycles". Also, a lot of attempts by the aggregator to claim that papers looking at specific locations are representative of the global picture. Lots of cherry-picking, too.

All in all, about what one would expect from a rejectionist blog.

Answer:
Non-threat