Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.

[Q]: "Additionally, the report found that forests in Southeast Alaska will capture more carbon going forward, though it is only a small region of the state."

Why? How? 
"going forward?" Please, let's kill this nonsensical and completely redundant idiom now.
[A]: Yes


[Q]: If they are running unopposed, then why do we waste the ink on having them on a ballot. Surely the Elections Officer can cast a ballot of one to put them back into office.
[A]: No


[Q]: Well, not exactly. The tax is meant to offset public health costs. The tax revenue rises and falls with the degree of consumption. If the tax reduces consumption, it's been successful, and the public health costs are decreased.
[A]:
No