In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

Input: Consider Input: Comment: Justicels..........................No, the Cologne New Year's gang sexual assaults of German women by migrants who were Arab or North African migrants and the Charlie Hebdo murders etc., etc., etc., proves it.

Output: Identity-attack


Input: Consider Input: Comment: What a crock! Scaremongering from an academic hoping if a disaster occurs in the markets, he can be the first to claim he predicted it.

Substitute "mutual funds" for ETFs and you have the same story - a bundle of assets packaged by a provider that includes a variety of holdings, all priced to their underlying value. Since MFs dominate ETFs by a factor of ten to one, why not apply the fear to a much bigger share of the investing world?

And by talking about a bundle of bonds in an ETF fund that masks the bad ones with the good ones -- just to draw an analogy to mispriced MBS -- makes it more ridiculous, because the bond rating services were responsible for treating the overall tranche without looking at the components in the ratings given to them. Deliberate and malicious incompetence, since the providers took out insurance to cover the losses on the products they fobbed off to the MBS purchasers, who suffered real losses from the mis-rating and had no cover.

Lousy analogy.

Output: Non-identity-attack


Input: Consider Input: Comment: No,  doubting is fine, like I said. Denigrating, lying about, and calling the President every name in the book, isn't. Whereas Obama is doubted by many, he was never called names by any, even though patriots thought of many. You guys keep harping about him grabbing women back when he was in show biz. Where sleeping your way to the top, and the casting couch was what it was.  You might not know it but Muslims have been killing each other for a thousand years because each other sees the other as an infidel, worthy only of death. Now they are targeting Europe, who gave them refuge. Now they are targeting us as well. You probably don't even know what  Taqiyya is.  But if Hillary had won, we would be in serious trouble. The millions of unveiled immigrants would be infiltrated by as much as 10- 20%. We're talking hundreds of thousands fundamentalist Muslims who want to get to paradise and be rewarded with 100 virgins.But lets say only 1000 got thru & killed 5 apiece. Is that acceptable?


Output: Identity-attack