We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Example Input: Sent1: We seem to have more compassion for the victims and potential victims of murderers than we do for the murderers.
 Sent2: By not giving the death penalty to a slaughtering murderer, we are telling the world that the life of this murderer is worth more than that of his victim.
Example Output: Not similar

Example Input: Sent1: The death penalty is sometimes claimed to save lives through deterrence.
 Sent2: But the statistics don't support the idea that the death penalty is any more effective as a detterent than is a life sentence.
Example Output: Similar

Example Input: Sent1: I am personally against the death penalty but would like to know in this particular scenario how just giving him life in prison would have been any different.
 Sent2: I personally would never wish death penalty on someone no matter what they did to me/family/friends I would just want them in jail for a life sentence because then the threat is pretty much over.
Example Output:
Similar