Given a paragraph about movies and a set of conversational questions and answers about the paragraph, say whether the passage contains sufficient information to answer the follow-up question. Say Yes if it is answerable; otherwise, say No. The paragraph has the prefix 'CONTEXT:'. Each conversation question has a prefix `Q:` followed by the answer prefix `A:`, and the follow-up question has a prefix `FOLLOWUP_Q:`.

Example Input: CONTEXT: Eric Andre (who played Max in the movie) is a series regular on the upcoming show Don't Trust The B***h in Apartment 23. Sometimes when a TV movie is shot ahead of a series, actors only sign contracts for the one appearance. In the interim they'll get other jobs (which probably pay far better) that have contracts that are more strict and don't allow for the time to work on more than one series. He also has his own Adult Swim show coming out this summer, so he's pretty busy. :D  <sep>  Q: Why was the game designer actor replaced in the show "Level Up"? A: actors only sign contracts for the one appearance  Q: Why do they do this? A: In the interim they'll get other jobs (which probably pay far better) that have contracts that are more strict and don't allow for the time to work on more than one series  Q: It seems only one actor was replaced, is this for a particular reason? A: also has his own Adult Swim show coming out this summer, so he's pretty busy. :D  Q: Is there a reason the actor was changed from the movie to the series? A: Eric Andre (who played Max in the movie) is a series regular on the upcoming show Don't Trust The B***h in Apartment 23  Q: Why couldn't he do both? A: Eric Andre  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Was he busy on other projects?
Example Output: Yes

Example Input: CONTEXT: I think the key is the line "He could've gone for general, but he went for himself instead." Kurtz had apparently lost interest in climbing higher in the military ranks, which presumably would have taken him away from combat and the front lines. He seemed to want to go in the opposite direction -- toward the heat of the fight -- so Kurtz requested Airborne training as a first step toward returning to combat. Kurtz took himself out of the running for promotion by enrolling in Airborne training. Promotion would have required continuing to follow an advancing career path -- whereas Kurtz brought his career advancement to a halt by enrolling in Airborne training.  <sep>  Q: What was the significance of Kurtz joining airborne
Example Output: Yes

Example Input: CONTEXT: It is not clear anywhere in movie to what religion she belonged. She was shown as orphan, it may be possilbe she never knew what religion her parents belonged to. As far as her name Latika is concerned, it is used by both muslims and hindus. It seems the director didn't want to show her as associated with any religion. If you look at her life, most of the time she was in kind of house arrest, so she herself may not have had time to decide what religion she wants. Regarding the logic that Muslim men are allowed to marry only muslim women, the society they belonged, I don't think rules are applied on them from any religous community. As Ankit pointed out in his answer, inter-religion marriage is not an alien concept, so she may be muslim or not.  <sep>  Q: Is Latika from "Slumdog Millionaire" Muslim? A: It is not clear anywhere in movie to what religion she belonged  Q: I noticed she didn't wear a headscarf, does that mean she isn't Muslim? A: She was shown as orphan, it may be possilbe she never knew what religion her parents belonged to  Q: Well there is a romance between Jamal and Latika, are Muslim men only permitted to marry Abrahamic women? A: I don't think rules are applied on them from any religous community. As Ankit pointed out in his answer, inter-religion marriage is not an alien concept, so she may be muslim or not  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Who played the role of Jamal?
Example Output:
No