In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

Q: Comment: The link to the post by the Democrat activist has "magically" disappeared. I guess she's forgotten that the Internet is forever and that screen shots of her petty screed will be available. How mean-spirited can you get when the VP's family has a small private outdoor wedding in a park-AS DO THOUSANDS OF OTHER COUPLES-and you decide because you don't like the Marines or the groom's Dad to be a nasty, vindictive witch. And you can spell that any way you want. From what I've witnessed locally, online and via public posts by a slate of Democrat talking heads from Pelosi to Waters to Jackson to Wilson-Democrats are simply sore losers who can't get over the fact that Hillary was disliked by many people, including many women.

A: Non-identity-attack
****
Q: Comment: Upon what evidence do you base your opinion that her response was "phony?"  Or that it was "outrage?"  The outrage that YOU are expressing shows an appalling lack of sensitivity on your part.  Why defend rudeness?

A: Non-identity-attack
****
Q: Comment: Pot defenders are like democrats.. at slightest poke at their bad deeds, they go apeshiite...  Pot is bad.  Colorado made a mistake and made deal with the devil...

A:
Non-identity-attack
****