In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.
--------
Question: Sentence: Sam took French classes from Adam, because he was eager to speak it fluently.
 Reason: The 'he' refers to sam because Sam was eager to put to practice what he learnt. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

Answer: Correct


Question: Sentence: Adam can't leave work here until Bob arrives to replace him. If Bob had  left home for work on time, he would be gone by this time.
 Reason: The 'he' refers to adam because he's the one who is left behind. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

Answer: Wrong


Question: Sentence: My meeting started at 4:00 and I needed to catch the train at 4:30,  so there wasn't much time. Luckily, it was delayed, so it worked out.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the train because I care about the train more. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

Answer:
Correct