Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.

Example Input: Property rights get used to it Lady...maybe we should look in you back yard  any junk cars?
Example Output: No

Example Input: I've just been made aware that the suspects, caught with a vehicle full of $3200 (per owner) worth of goods stolen in a local break-in, just got off with just about no penalties at all. This is part of a family with multiple convictions over the generations. However, the impounded vehicle (with the stolen goods inside) was released from impound to someone using a false address. The owner will never see his stuff again. The break-in artists are free to steal again. Now we neighbors are concerned that the brave person who followed and reported these professional thieves will be subject to retaliation. This is just a microcosm of the Mat-Su and Alaska justice system...mirrors the murder situation in this article. The reasons for not fully prosecuting miscreants is: Lenient ("too compassionate") District Attorneys; easy judges; and, the kicker: not enough room in our prisons. Violent offenders like Mr. Almeda are barely punished, allowing them to seduce and kill vulnerable young women.
Example Output: Yes

Example Input: I strongly disagree. Many confuse disagreement with the word troll.
Example Output:
Yes