We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Q: Sent1: Guns don't kill people, if they did, they would go to jail for murder- not the murderers.
 Sent2: people who want to kill, will kill if you ban guns, they will kill with knives, or something else.

A: Not similar
****
Q: Sent1: We could hypothesize that if guns are banned then law abiding citizens who usually didn't carry or own guns before the ban will be less likely to face armed opponents.
 Sent2: Gun laws and bans are put in place that only affect good law abiding free citizens.

A: Not similar
****
Q: Sent1: The courts decided that it was legal for Ms. Love to purchase a handgun although they denied her claim that the second amendment protected handgun ownership.
 Sent2: I think the precedent set by Heller was that the Second Amendment protects an individual right but judges can still do the mental gymnastics to justify the gun control laws they like.

A:
Not similar
****