In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Comment: Of course the progressives here are 'praying' for Cardinal Pell to be convicted. Why?  Not because he might be guilty or innocent, that is immaterial. It because he is an orthodox Catholic bishop.  Orthodox Catholics in the Curia have been regularly cursed by Pope Francis who has gradually placed his heterodox cronies into high places in the Curia.
"I am the Pope."
Non-sexual-explicit

Comment: I was so excited to eat at Mi Mero Mole until I found out that the owner, Nick Zukin, was racist and so dismissive of Black Lives Matter.

I'm grateful that this very real issue with Saffron has brought much more about Portland businesses into the light and caused folks to dig deeper into who they support.

Smart business owners should do the right thing and use this opportunity to sympathize with the community (who is rightfully outraged) with the result of likely earning that community's support and winning  them over to their business (much like Ristretto Roasters did) rather than PUBLICLY expressing support and shooting themselves in the proverbial foot. It doesn't look like Nick Zukin is that kind of business owner. I suppose some people just like to commit business-suicide.

It's amazing how arrogant business owners like Sally and Nick are to think that Portland has enough racists or racist-sympathizers to keep their restaurants afloat.
Non-sexual-explicit

Comment: here's something -- stop with stupid taxes like the carbon tax and increasing our hydro costs, etc... the REAL inflation rate is higher than the CPI i can assure you.  less money to spend = less money to stimulate the economy. The US is going to eat our lunch very soon.

Non-sexual-explicit