In this task, you're given a statement, and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence clearly disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3' corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.

Example Input: Statement: Congress would not have needed to add the certification provision to protect the presidential advisers if their records were not within the scope of GAOas access authority. Choices:  1. The certification provision would not be added if the advisers did not provide records. 2. The certification provision would not need to be added. 3. The certification provision would need to be added.
Example Output: 3

Example Input: Statement: Having conditioned its audience to view IQ as all-important, The Bell Curve then manipulates statistics in a way that makes IQ look bigger, and everything else smaller, in determining Americans' life-chances. Choices:  1. The Bell Curve and the popular perception of IQ are unrelated. 2. The Bell Curve is partly responsible for inflating the image of IQ while simultaneously diminishing the image of other factors. 3. The Bell Curve may be responsible for the altered perception, though it may be founded in some truth and fact.
Example Output: 1

Example Input: Statement: At Newby Mill near Lakeside Stott Park, Bobbin Mill was still operating commercially as recently as 1974. Choices:  1. In 1985, Bobbin Mill closed its doors for the final time. 2. Bobbin Mill was still functional at Newby Mill in 1974. 3. Though the building still stood, Bobbin Mill had finished operations permanently in 1965.
Example Output:
3