In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: threat and non-threat. Threat is a statement that someone will be hurt or harmed, especially if the person does not do something in particular.

[EX Q]: Comment: This guy is someone spread hate. He should be denied freedom of speech.
[EX A]: Non-threat

[EX Q]: Comment: What a mega waste of borrowed money! All Trudeau needed to do was talk to former PM Jean Chretien on the airplane about it. We all remember how Chretien killed the GST. He is the expert. Harper actually kept more promises. Stupid ones like the gun registry and wheat board come to mind. The GST is something Trudeau never promised to touch, but the party owes us closure. It would actually help get the economy back to abolish GST and cancel some obsolete programs like the RRSP disaster. 

With Carbon taxes planned, the GST promise Chretien made could finally be honoured. Why do they call politician honourable when they're not?
[EX A]: Non-threat

[EX Q]: Comment: A white South African high court judge is the subject of the latest in a series of race rows in the country after she said that black South African men regarded rape as a cultural right. She has since resigned ahead of an inquiry and after an extensive hate mail and politicking against her by the ANC et al and the PRESS.
Interesting to see what happens with respect to this article???
[EX A]:
Non-threat