In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

[EX Q]: Comment: Holy crap, does the WE not have anything better to report?
[EX A]: Obscene

[EX Q]: Comment: "It does seem a little hypocritical for Dogwood to be complaining about Kinder Morgan playing a role in the B.C. election through its donations to the BC Liberals, when it is receiving money from the United States to fight for causes aligned with interests there. "
In one case, foreign interests donate money to advocacy groups.
In the other, foreign interests donate money to a political party whose members currently form the provincial government. 
Not even remotely equivalent, Gary, and tf. hardly hypocritical of Dogwood to complain about it.
[EX A]: Non-obscene

[EX Q]: Comment: Properly corrected. Grazing rights. Thank you. But it is in no way shape or form "her" property. If it is I am going to move to the mountains and squat on government land and call my buddy Cliven and all his psycho buddies to bring their guns to protect me.  Nut cases milking the government. Grazing rights prices are absurdly low compared to other potential land uses.  There is your government corruption for you.
[EX A]:
Non-obscene