In this task, you're given a statement, and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence clearly disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3' corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.

Q: Statement: It would be sheer folly for such a company to invent preposterous lies and spins and feed them to the nation's most prominent publications. Choices:  1. The company's bet route of action would be to make up a bunch of lies. 2. It wouldn't be smart for a company to produce a bunch of lies. 3. Producing a bunch of lies would cost the company loyal customers.

A: 1
****
Q: Statement: Good luck.' Choices:  1. I hope you fail.  2. I'm sincerely rooting for you.  3. Break a leg. 

A: 1
****
Q: Statement: The central security manager told us that she considered the tests, which could be performed inexpensively by her staff, a cost-effective way to evaluate this important aspect of security and provide a service to the academic departments, which were ultimately responsible for the security of their departments' information and operations. Choices:  1. The central security manager rejected the tests, claiming that they were too expensive and complex. 2. The tests have been regarded as a cost-effective way of evaluating this aspect of security. 3. The central security manager took action based on the tests, improving department security.

A:
1
****