The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.

[Q]: Context: 'hi are you getting ready for your camping trip too?'
Utterance: 'I am! I am looking forward to it so much since I haven't been able to go on any vacation due to Covid. I'm going camping with my husband and kids. Where do you plan to be camping?'
[A]: No


[Q]: Context: 'I would do this instead: 3 firewood, 1 water and 2 food.' 'That's not going to be a fair offer, you'll need to do better than that or I don't think we can come to an agreement' '3 firewood, 1 water, 0 food'
Utterance: 'so I'll get 2 water, 3 food and 0 firewood?'
[A]: No


[Q]: Context: 'I have not really camped before so I am looking for as many supplies as possible.  What about I get 3 food, 3 firewood, and 1 water. ' 'funnny you but no. so what else will i be left with if i give you those. okay let say i get 2 food, 2 firewood and 1 water.' 'I am really bad at cooking so will probably need an extra good just because I'll ruin one of the 3.  Plus Im bringing 2 dogs they can eat the bad food I make 😮  I dont plan on hiking much so how bought I keep all 3 foods, and you keep all 3 waters and we can split the firewood.  2 for me, 1 for you. Great deal!'
Utterance: 'i too i am bad at cooking and i will spend a longer time in the woods so i will need atleast 2 foods, 2 firewood and 1 water'
[A]:
No