Categorize the comment on the basis of severe toxicity. If the comment is severely toxic output Yes, otherwise output No.

[Q]: Only about 20% of Americans believe that abortion should be illegal in all cases. So by your reasoning, 80% of all your countrymen support legal "mass murder," and I am one of them.
[A]: No


[Q]: The possible legal ramifications from Mr. Hammer's alleged actions have not been determined.  The evidence of those actions seems rather strong and acknowledging so is hardly a "personal attack."  The rifles were recoverd from a property owned and/or controlled by Mr. Hammer.  Just to clarify: a) rash verdict.......that's the responsibility of a judge or jury..to my knowledge, none has been reached b) accusations.....those were made first by the tenant, then by the legal authorities based on testimony from the tenant and evidence acquired via a Search Warrent and c) personal attack...I will gladly repeat that if Mr. Hammer is, indeed, guilty of the actions mentioned in this article,  it was really "stupid" for him to have taken the actions. If asked today, I'm guessing he would likely agree with me.
[A]: No


[Q]: Lots of comments but no facts to refute that their was a family incident that required Mr. Stewart going to court.  Did the event happen, sounds like it did, did it frighten the two young women, apparently it did so Mr. Stewart there is enough evidence available in the court of public opinion that kind of parenting doesn't allow you to bully your child under any circumstances and it doesn't help you in trying to win an elect to anything.
[A]:
No