We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

[Q]: Sent1: The crime rate was higher after the death penalty than before it.
 Sent2: In the time that the death penalty was performed on a regular basis, the crime rate in society was at a lower level.
[A]: Similar


[Q]: Sent1: Many people who support the death penalty are not willing to admit that vengeance plays a role - probably because they would be uncomfortable admiting that.
 Sent2: If they are uncomfortable admitting that vengeance is the underlying reason, then perhaps they should re-think their stance on the death penalty.
[A]: Similar


[Q]: Sent1: An argument for putting people to death is so that they can never escape and kill again.
 Sent2: I think instead of a death penalty, they should just stay in prison until they die because putting someone to death is just harsh, No matter who it is.
[A]:
Not similar