In this task, you are given a part of an article. Your task is to generate headline (title) for this text. Preferred headlines are under fifteen words.

Q: A famous biologically inspired hierarchical model firstly proposed by Riesenhuber and Poggio has been successfully applied to multiple visual recognition tasks. The model is able to achieve a set of positionand scale-tolerant recognition, which is a central problem in pattern recognition. In this paper, based on some other biological experimental results, we introduce the Memory and Association Mechanisms into the above biologically inspired model. The main motivations of the work are (a) to mimic the active memory and association mechanism and add the ’top down’ adjustment to the above biologically inspired hierarchical model and (b) to build up an algorithm which can save the space and keep a good recognition performance. More details of the work could be explained as follows: (1) In objects memorizing process: Our proposed model mimics some characteristics of human’s memory mechanism as follows: (a) In our model, one object is memorized by semantic attributes and special image patches (corresponding to episodic memory). The semantic attributes describe each part of the object with clear physical meaning, for example, if eyes and mouths of faces are ’big’ or ’small’ and so on. One special patch is selected if the value of the corresponding semantic feature is far from average one. The patch should be the most prominent part of the object. (b) In our model, different features (semantic attributes and special patches) of one object are stored in distributed places and the common feature of different objects is saved aggregately, which can learn to classify the difference of similar features of different objects. The similarity thresholds to each object can be learnt when new objects are learnt. (2) In object recognition process: In biological process, the associated recognition including familiarity discrimination and recollective matching. In our proposed model, firstly mimicking familiarity discrimination (’knowing’ though the episode), we compare the special patches of candidates with that of saved objects using above mentioned biologically inspired hierarchical model, where the candidates and saved objects have the same prominent semantic features. Then mimicking recollective matching, the comparison results of special patches are combined with semantic feature comparison. The new model is also applied to object recognition processes. The primary experimental results show that our method is efficient with much less memory requirement.

A: Introducing Memory and Association Mechanism Into a Biologically Inspired Visual Model
****
Q: We study the problem of identifying the best action among a set of possible options when the value of each action is given by a mapping from a number of noisy micro-observables in the so-called fixed confidence setting. Our main motivation is the application to the minimax game search, which has been a major topic of interest in artificial intelligence. In this paper we introduce an abstract setting to clearly describe the essential properties of the problem. While previous work only considered a two-move game tree search problem, our abstract setting can be applied to the general minimax games where the depth can be non-uniform and arbitrary, and transpositions are allowed. We introduce a new algorithm (LUCB-micro) for the abstract setting, and give its lower and upper sample complexity results. Our bounds recover some previous results, which were only available in more limited settings, while they also shed further light on how the structure of minimax problems influence sample complexity.

A: Structured Best Arm Identification with Fixed Confidence
****
Q: We propose a statistical model applicable to character level language modeling and show that it is a good fit for both, program source code and English text. The model is parameterized by a program from a domain-specific language (DSL) that allows expressing non-trivial data dependencies. Learning is done in two phases: (i) we synthesize a program from the DSL, essentially learning a good representation for the data, and (ii) we learn parameters from the training data – the process is done via counting, as in simple language models such as n-gram. Our experiments show that the precision of our model is comparable to that of neural networks while sharing a number of advantages with n-gram models such as fast query time and the capability to quickly add and remove training data samples. Further, the model is parameterized by a program that can be manually inspected, understood and updated, addressing a major problem of neural networks.

A:
PROGRAM SYNTHESIS FOR CHARACTER LEVEL LANGUAGE MODELING
****