We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Q: Sent1: NATO, Galileo has claimed that these laws are designed to reduce criminal use of guns (which would have to mean that they target the people, not the guns).
 Sent2: Ok, so are the gun haters claiming the police department are giving the guns criminals use for crime back to the criminals?

A: Not similar
****
Q: Sent1: In some states, some guns are just not allowed and it sticks as a law.
 Sent2: No, but they might like to challenge the conclusion that states with less strict firearm laws are more often the source of guns used in crimes, in other states, than guns from states with stricter gun laws.

A: Not similar
****
Q: Sent1: The laws the gun haters want will keep the right to bear arms from the law abiding citizens!
 Sent2: Common sense gun control laws the gun haters want will only affect the law abiding citizens, not the criminals.

A:
Similar
****