We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gay Marriage) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gay marriage. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gay marriage.

[EX Q]: While on an evolutionary level homosexuality makes little sense, it really does not make sense that a government should have the right to make gay people subcitizens.
[EX A]: Valid

[EX Q]: The Defense of Marriage Act, or DOMA, was enacted by Congress in 1996 when it appeared Hawaii would soon legalize same-sex marriage and opponents worried that other states would be forced to recognize such marriages.
[EX A]: Valid

[EX Q]: The only feasible and truly fair solution, since you've decided to screw it up for everyone, is to have a system of giving these benefits that has nothing to do with marriage whatsoever.
[EX A]:
Valid