We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

[EX Q]: Sent1: So to avoid any (more) backlash about the law, Reid included a provision to further protect gun owners from either seeing their insurance rates increase, or from having their names collected and entered into some federal gun owner database.
 Sent2: Right now it is against the law for the government to keep a database of gun owners, that that law would have to be changed, and I think you also know this.
[EX A]: Not similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: Please tell the murder victims in these other countries that gun control works.
 Sent2: it isn't guns that kill people, is the mentality these people carry around in their heads that kill other people.
[EX A]: Not similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: Gun free zones are areas where law-abiding citizens are forbidden to carry guns.
 Sent2: Gun free zones are zones where criminals will have guns because criminals will not obey the laws about gun free zones.
[EX A]:
Similar