In this task, you will be shown a sentence, and you should determine whether it is overruling or non-overruling. In law, an overruling sentence is a statement that nullifies a previous case decision as a precedent by a constitutionally valid statute or a decision by the same or higher ranking court which establishes a different rule on the point of law involved. Classify your answers into overruling or non-overruling

Example Input: see garrett v. garrett, 111 nev. 972, 973-74, 899 p.2d 1112, 1113-14 (1995) (explaining that the statutory cap is the amount that is established by the nrs 125b.070 formula and serves as the starting point from which the court must begin its calculations when allowing any deviations).
Example Output: non-overruling

Example Input: however, because the stalking statute proscribes an entire course of conduct, ""a second or successive offense is not necessarily committed by acts that are factually distinct from each other but only by acts that are factually distinct from the entire course of conduct punished by the first conviction.""
Example Output: non-overruling

Example Input: nonetheless, we must recede from williams v. state, 427 so.2d 768 (fla. 2d dca 1983), and matthews v. state, 584 so.2d 1105 (fla. 2d dca 1991), to the extent that these opinions engraft a "fair trial" standard upon the faretta test, and we disapprove steps four through six of the faretta inquiry in jones v. state, 658 so.2d 122 (fla. 2d dca 1995) (altenbernd, j., specially concurring), which relied upon williams and matthews.
Example Output:
overruling