In this task, you are given the abstract of a research paper. Your task is to generate a summary of this abstract. Your summary should not be very short, but it's better if it's not more than 30 words.

  Analysis methods which enable us to better understand the
  representations and functioning of neural models of language are
  increasingly needed as deep learning becomes the dominant approach
  in NLP. Here we present two methods based on Representational
  Similarity Analysis (RSA) and Tree Kernels (TK) which allow us to
  directly quantify how strongly the information encoded in neural
  activation patterns corresponds to information represented by
  symbolic structures such as syntax trees. We first validate our
  methods on the case of a simple synthetic language for arithmetic
  expressions with clearly defined syntax and semantics, and show that
  they exhibit the expected pattern of results. We then apply our methods to
  correlate neural representations of English sentences with their
  constituency parse trees.
Two methods based on Representational Similarity Analysis (RSA) and Tree Kernels (TK) which directly quantify how strongly information encoded in neural activation patterns corresponds to information represented by symbolic structures.

Energy  based  models  outputs  unmormalized  log-probability  values  given  datasamples.   Such a estimation is essential in a variety of application problems suchas sample generation, denoising, sample restoration, outlier detection, Bayesianreasoning, and many more.   However, standard maximum likelihood training iscomputationally expensive due to the requirement of sampling model distribution. Score matching potentially alleviates this problem, and denoising score matching(Vincent, 2011) is a particular convenient version.   However,  previous attemptsfailed to produce models capable of high quality sample synthesis.   We believethat  it  is  because  they  only  performed  denoising  score  matching  over  a  singlenoise scale. To overcome this limitation, here we instead learn an energy functionusing all noise scales.    When sampled using Annealed Langevin dynamics andsingle step denoising jump, our model produced high-quality samples comparableto state-of-the-art techniques such as GANs, in addition to assigning likelihood totest data comparable to previous likelihood models.   Our model set a new sam-ple quality baseline in likelihood-based models.   We further demonstrate that our model learns sample distribution and generalize well on an image inpainting tasks.
Learned energy based model with score matching

Neural network pruning techniques can reduce the parameter counts of trained networks by over 90%, decreasing storage requirements and improving computational performance of inference without compromising accuracy. However, contemporary experience is that the sparse architectures produced by pruning are difficult to train from the start, which would similarly improve training performance.

 We find that a standard pruning technique naturally uncovers subnetworks whose initializations made them capable of training effectively. Based on these results, we articulate the "lottery ticket hypothesis:" dense, randomly-initialized, feed-forward networks contain subnetworks ("winning tickets") that - when trained in isolation - reach test accuracy comparable to the original network in a similar number of iterations. The winning tickets we find have won the initialization lottery: their connections have initial weights that make training particularly effective.

 We present an algorithm to identify winning tickets and a series of experiments that support the lottery ticket hypothesis and the importance of these fortuitous initializations. We consistently find winning tickets that are less than 10-20% of the size of several fully-connected and convolutional feed-forward architectures for MNIST and CIFAR10. Above this size, the winning tickets that we find learn faster than the original network and reach higher test accuracy.

Feedforward neural networks that can have weights pruned after training could have had the same weights pruned before training