Given a document and an entity the task is to select the author's sentiment towards the entity. Sentiments can be Positive, Neutral and Negative. Select Positive if the article expresses a positive view towards the given entity or praises its quality or skills. Select Neutral if the document expresses no clear view towards the entity or has equal amounts of positive and negative statements or expressing some fact/quote by someone else. Select Negative if the article expresses a negative view towards like harsh remarks, criticizing entities action/decision etc. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

[EX Q]: What is the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Matt Patricia ? Come fall   Matt Patricia   with pencil tucked firmly behind  his  ear  is likely going to be patrolling some NFL sideline as a head coach. But where?
The New England Patriots defensive coordinator  the hottest name among assistant coaches expected to move up  is moving toward becoming the next coach of the Detroit Lions  according to ESPN in news that is likely to disappoint New York Giants fans.  Patricia   43  and the Lions  however  still have to agree on contract details  something that under NFL rules cannot be done until the Patriots' season ends. New England advanced to the AFC championship game next weekend with a victory Saturday night over Tennessee.
 Patricia  would be joining Bob Quinn  who formerly worked for the Patriots and is now the Lions general manager.
As for the Giants  they'll be in a bit of a pickle if  Patricia  ends up in Detroit. They're also eyeing Josh McDaniels  the Patriots' offensive coordinator  and Pat Shurmur  the Minnesota Vikings' offensive coordinator. McDaniels has emerged as the top choice to replace Chuck Pagano with the Indianapolis Colts  according to the NFL Network's Ian Rapoport  and Shurmur is believed to be the top choice of the Arizona Cardinals after the retirement of Bruce Arians. Like  Patricia   McDaniels and Shurmur cannot finalize contracts until after their teams' seasons end. Shurmur's Vikings play the Saints in a divisional-round game Sunday afternoon.
Detroit might be the most comfortable landing spot for  Patricia   given  his  penchant for tweaking NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell. Better for  him  to not to be just across the river from the NFL's Park Avenue headquarters after wearing a Deflategate T-shirt depicting Goodell as a clown after the Patriots won Super Bowl LI last February.
"I think  Matt  is a great leader.  He 's got a great personality and  he  works  his  tail off " Tom Brady told the New York Daily News on Saturday night. " He 's got a tremendous amount of respect from all the players. Just a great coach. I love  Matt ."
Although  he  had a much ballyhooed sideline argument with McDaniels during a game last fall  Brady has since apologized.
[EX A]: Neutral

[EX Q]: What is the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Rachel Botsman ? In her witty new book Australian technology author and TED celebrity Rachel Botsman tells us why it did not work. Who Can You Trust? How Technology Brought Us Together and Why It Could Drive Us Apart might be a bit too perky for some but it reveals some deep truths.
With industrial power collapsed  social media’s “distributed trust” began its run to win popular trust.  Botsman  even claims to have predicted the next stage of evolution  anticipating Airbnb  Zipcar and Uber in  her  previous book. At first the masses took to social technology like ducks to water but few thought through the costs of power flowing from institutional experts to less sophisticated individuals. It turned out that these social media had institutions too  if less hierarchical  but still leading to someone at the top with a great degree of control over the people’s “open” media below them.
 Botsman  says  she  would not have written  her  book if  she  did not think distributed networks could solve many problems and develop popular trust  but the many examples presented in  her  book demonstrate that “distributed trust always seem to lead us back to centralized power ” with Facebook  Amazon  and Alibaba leading the list.
 Her  thesis is that distributed systems need to know who is telling the truth in order to be social but their media technology develop so fast and anonymously it becomes difficult to trace accountability. Perhaps 75 percent of automobiles will self-drive by 2040. How can sufficient trust develop in such a major activity in such a short time? Blockchains like Bitcoin may replace governmental currency and financial transactions. Robots threaten to take everyone’s job. The most famous bot was HAL 9000 in 2001: A Space Odyssey and we all know what happened then. Some “trust pause” will certainly be necessary for such major social transitions.
Take the number one social media technology guy  Mark Zuckerberg  who created Facebook to be an open forum for public discussion. Yet  after social media was accused of biasing the presidential election even  he  had to reluctantly concede (the second time) that there was an abundance of fake news on  his  site  which  he  then promised to fix in a socially positive way.  His  solution was to balance alternative views by adding “additional perspectives ” including noting after doubtful material that fact checkers disputed the claims in the original published news. But who would do the “fact checking”?
 Botsman  does not mention  it  but Google’s top scientist Ray Kurzweil had bigger ideas. Computers would be thinking for themselves by 2014 with humans becoming immortal soon after. Humans would become immortal under Kurzweil’s Calico project to replicate nature’s control of mitochondrial DNA by moving toxic bacteria into the cell nucleus to stop aging. With age under control people would live forever. At the same time  artificial intelligence would develop computers that learn by themselves. Ageless individuals could then link an AI machine to their brain so they could give accurate and immediate responses to every kind of question. But if this takes place instantly  is that a person still a person or a computer?
China’s Social Credit System would produce a “social credit score” for every Chinese citizen and introduce national networks of shame to ameliorate and control unruly segments of the population. This system should have a bullish future in much of the world now under authoritarian governments.  Botsman  quips: “Today China  tomorrow a place near you.”
Not a place in the U.S. with its democratic government protecting privacy  right? One big obstacle to such protection mentioned by  Botsman  is that government regulation simply cannot keep up with the explosive rate of change in private social media technology. There is that free speech and press stuff but Congress just approved another renewal of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act seventeen years after 9/11 and few doubt that some similar future horrendous terrorist act would make the government’s surveillance even more intrusive.
 Botsman ’s general solution to increase social trust is to rely upon reputation  which is sound  but extremely difficult to evaluate as  her  book proves.
How do we even know if  Botsman  isn’t a bot already  predicting China for us all?
[EX A]: Positive

[EX Q]: What is the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Rachael Denhollander ? Rachael Denhollander  was the first woman to publicly accuse former USA Gymnastics team doctor Larry Nassar of sexual abuse. As  she  worked to find justice for  herself  and the doctorâs other victims   Denhollander  began to turn a critical eye on a community that  she  depended on dearly for support â  her  church.
It soon became clear to  her  that when it comes to properly caring for survivors of sexual abuse  the church has a long way to go â and experts HuffPost spoke to agree.
 Denhollander  opened up about  her  disappointment with the American evangelical church in an interview Wednesday with Christianity Todayâs Morgan Lee.
 Denhollander  was one of more than 150 survivors who shared statements in court during Nassarâs sentencing hearing. In  her  statement   Denhollander  spoke about how  her  advocacy for sexual assault victims âcost me my church and our closest friends.â
 Brendan McDermid / Reuters Rachael Denhollander (center)  listens as Larry Nassar is sentenced.
 Denhollander  said one of the biggest struggles  she  faced was trying to come to terms with what happened to  her  from a spiritual perspective.  She  told Christianity Today that  she  initially wondered why God didnât prevent the abuse  and if  she  was âstainedâ by it. Over the years   she  came to realize that church teachings sometimes can be used to âmitigate and to minimizeâ victimsâ suffering.
â³[Christians] can tend to gloss over the devastation of any kind of suffering but especially sexual assault  with Christian platitudes like God works all things together for good or God is sovereign â  she  told Christianity Today. âThose are very good and glorious biblical truths  but when they are misapplied in a way to dampen the horror of evil  they ultimately dampen the goodness of God.â
JEFF KOWALSKY via Getty Images Rachael Denhollander first came forward with public accusations against Nassar in 2016.
 Denhollander  first went public with her accusations in The Indianapolis Star in September 2016. At the time  she and her husband were attending a church in Louisville  Kentucky. She claimed the church was âdirectlyâ involved in supporting a local pastor who had been accused of covering up child sex abuse. When  Denhollander  spoke up on behalf of survivors   it  caused a rift between her and the leaders of her church. She said some elders even used her personal story of sexual abuse as a weapon against her  claiming that the assault had clouded her judgment as an advocate.
In the interview with Christianity Today   Denhollander  made it clear that she feels the problem is bigger than one individual congregation. She believes the American evangelical church as a whole has to work much harder to appropriately respond to abuse allegations from survivors.
âThe only reason I am able to have the support of these leaders now is because I am speaking out against an organization not within their community â  Denhollander  said. âHad I been so unfortunate so as to have been victimized by someone in their community ... I would be massively shunned. Thatâs the reality.â
âHaving communicated with hundreds of clergy sex abuse survivors over the past decade  and based on my personal experience as well  I can say that  Rachael âs statement is absolutely true in its assessment of how abysmally evangelical leaders would react if  she  had been victimized by someone within their own community â Brown told HuffPost. â Rachael âs statement should serve as a challenge to evangelical faith groups to at least come up to speed with the basic norms of accountability structures.â
[EX A]:
Positive