Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.

Q: I agree with using PF earnings to fund some government. I couldn't tell but it seemed the author was in favor of the status quo. He also seemed to advocate spending cuts(which I support but likely won't happen), and an income tax. 

Problem is, that ain't gonna do it. It would be a miracle if there were $500 million in spending cuts. Or perhaps a $500 million whack in oil taxes and credits. A combination of Income tax and sales tax might be good for 300 or 400 million dollars. You still have to find 2.5 billion somewhere...or hope like heck for $120 pb oil.

That's why I made the stupid post on purpose. I wanted to show how much income tax that wage and income earners would have to pay in a hypothetical to eliminate the deficit as it stands now. Because the 6% of federal liability would only cover around 2.5% of it, or around $100 million

Failed reading comprehension? I'll admit it was a weak subject for me. But something needs to change in the status quo with the PF and PFD.

A: Yes
****
Q: The solution Randall was provided by Professor Johnathan Gruber of MIT who wrote most of the ACA for the Obama crowd. And as you recall his recorded comments  were that the American public is so stupid they  will buy into the programs even though it raises all costs, does not improve health care delivery, and there are not enough doctors to service the basic system.  It wasn't enough that Obama illegally stole 600+billion from MEDICARE to help pay for the illegal program, that theft of dedicated funds still has not been corrected by the courts but some issues have. So just where is Mrs. Martell/Murkowski going wrong?

A: Yes
****
Q: That's actually an awesome idea. We'll call it the idiot tax.

A:
Yes
****