TASK DEFINITION: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
PROBLEM: It's just unconscionable that poor Olive's sexual nature is being published in a newspaper!  A suit against the R-G and Greenhill for intention infliction of emotional distress needs to be filed immediately!

SOLUTION: Yes

PROBLEM: Property rights get used to it Lady...maybe we should look in you back yard  any junk cars?

SOLUTION: No

PROBLEM: While agree whole heartedly with Outsider's perspective I would add the following. 

[1]. The whole issue of abortion would have been and would certainly be better handled on a State by State bases by the voters of each State. 

[2]. The SCOTUS was never intended to act as an activist court in any matter of the law their existence is to interpret law not write new laws.  Roe vs. Wade, homosexual marriage are such examples.

[3]. Abortion should not be funded by federal or State tax dollars with only three exceptions rape, incest, and the medical verification of the potential loss of the mothers life. 

[4]. I believe one would be hard pressed to find many individuals who hold firmly to a 100% pro-life stance. While I personally do not support abortion i.e., a form of terminal birth-control on demand, I do support abortion in cases of rape, incest and a medical verification of the potential loss of the mothers life.

SOLUTION:
Yes