In this task, you must classify if a given review is positive/negative, indicating your answer as P or N.
--------
Question: written by mark rosenthal and lawrence konner starring charlize theron , bill paxton , david paymer as reviewed by james brundage
i 'm beginning to get fed up .
over my four years as a critic , the thing which has kept me going is the moderate balance of films .
the good balances the bad .
i try to see both in equal proportions .
but disney 's mighty joe young remake marks the fourth week in which i have n't seen a truly terrible movie .
it 's a backwards machismo , i suppose , the urge to see the things which you so loathe ; but i need to see a bad film every once in a while .
and , you know what , mighty joe young does n't qualify .
far from being bad , mighty joe young is actually a family fun movie .
it 's enjoyable , appropriate , cute , cuddly , and all of those other things that i 've been seeing in every movie since a bug 's life .
mighty joe young tracks a 2 , 000 pound gorilla in the wilds of africa that is taken to a reserve in .
. .
california ? .
.
. for safe - keeping .
okay .
a little unrealistic , but who ever said a kid 's movie had to have the slightest hint of realism .
the first half of the movie is a gorillas in the mist - esque hatred of poachers woman - of - the - wild motif .
the second half is a straight up parody of king kong , awestruck onlookers and all .
mark one down .
i 'm feeling relaxed .
it is , as a point of fact , an extremely un - creative movie .
but , as a vetern , i can say quite honestly that creativity does n't count for as much as it should .
so that saves mighty joe from my wrath , although my colleagues and cohorts and surely bashing this film at this very moment .
this is not the film to take a girl on a date to .
it 's not the film for you .
it 's the film for you and your family .
when you 're right alongside your kid , all of the normal rights and wrongs slip away .
the same thing happens when you watch a horror movie or an action flick .
it becomes fun .
all you have to do to enjoy mighty joe young is shut up and watch .

Answer: P


Question: synopsis : two con artists find the perfect patsy in harry ( woody harrelson ) - - an inept former journalist who trips and bumps his head into a post , tries to slap a girl and gets poked in the eye , has ill - timed fits of coughing , and fails at everything he does .
the story is told from harry 's point of view .
harry always carries around a shot of whiskey although he swears he does n't drink .
one day harry is approached by the con girl rhea ( elisabeth shue ) , who is similar to harry in that she carries around a cigarette but swears she does n't smoke .
seduced , harry agrees to participate in a money - making scheme involving faking the kidnapping of odette ( chloe sevigny ) , the teenage daughter of a rich man .
turns out , it 's all part of a needless , very puzzling , extremely elaborate and convoluted scheme
( it involves hiring special impersonators ) by two cons in order to fool harry , a hero who barely has the intellectual capacity of a wooden post .
when the ' kidnapped ' odette is found dead , the clues point to harry as the kidnapper / murderer , and the police are hot on harry 's trail .
harry suddenly realizes he has been framed while others have taken the ransom money .
can he get out of this mess ?
opinion : palmetto is a long , uninteresting film with all the wrong feel .
hero harry is an inept bungler who trips up often and consistently overestimates his own intelligence .
this farcical kind of character works best in an entertaining naked gun action comedy or dragnet spoof .
but palmetto is played like a dark , serious , detective noir drama , and watching harry 's bumbling confidence amounts to an irritating distraction .
there 's a lapse in concentration in the middle of the movie as the camera goes wild on breasts , buttocks , short skirts , colored painted nails , and women 's legs .
even when the focus is supposedly on harry and his dilema , you can always notice the side of elizabeth shue 's breast forming a prominent foreground .
towards the end , palmetto re - focuses on plot for the grand finale - - a confusing explanation involving impersonators , with woody harrelson handcuffed and suspended over a tub of acid as he hears the criminals ' confession . if you can imagine ' shemp ' from the three stooges playing the detective hero of an hbo ' lingerie suspense ' thriller , that 's how out of synch this movie feels .

Answer: N


Question: by phil curtolo " madonna - antonio banderas - jonathan price - in an alan parker film - with music from andrew lloyd weber - and lyrics by tim rice - evita .
"
now i have to admit , the trailer for this rock - opera - turned - major motion picture is almost breath - taking for some .
the soundtrack is wonderful to listen to .
so why would n't the movie be wonderful to see .
simple , a little over 2 hours of constant singing can almost drive you insane .
the story of eva duarte ( madonna ) , evita is full of drama that 's trapped inside by all the notes and chords .
she was an orphaned child who ends up becoming a hooker , then goes into the field of acting , and finally meets juan peron ( price ) , the soon - to - be first president of argentina .
they fall in love and eventually marry .
sounds pretty good , does n't it .
well the story gets better , as eva goes on the " rainbow tour " across europe , trying to win respect .
eva duarte was a wonderful lady .
however , all of the drama - packed moments above were never understood because the actors and actresses sang to fast to be understood .
i went into theater 4 at magic cinemas with the attitude that evita was going to be terribly boring
and i left with happy , because i was right .
they only thing that kept me awake during the movie was the loud bangs of the drums and strums of the guitar .
although it did come off as dull , the beautiful cinematography is eye - catching , as was madonna 's performance .
as the " spiritual leader of argentina , " madonna would have definitely been an oscar - contender had she spoken a single line .
but her chance was taken away with the stubbornness of making an exact replica of the broadway musical a film .
do n't get me wrong and do n't look at my grade .
i am not a big fan of musicals on the big screen .
if you 're going to pay to see a movie , you want to see a movie .
now i have to admit , it 's a lot cheaper to pay $ 5 than $ 200 plus to see the play , but that 's what did me in .
all this review contains is my opinion and my grade was set before i even saw the movie .
now you may be saying , " what kind of critic is he ? , " and you 're right .
as a critic , i should have given the movie a chance .
but as a 17-year old quentin tarantino fan , it was way too hard . ,

Answer:
N