In this task, you will be presented with a context from an academic paper and a question separated with a 
. You have to answer the question based on the context.

Ex Input:
The input for both tasks consists of news articles in free-text format, collected from 36 propagandist and 12 non-propagandist news outlets and then annotated by professional annotators.  
 Question: What dataset was used?

Ex Output:
 news articles in free-text format


Ex Input:
Our dataset is annotated based on Chinese pathology reports provided by the Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Ruijin Hospital. It contains 17,833 sentences, 826,987 characters and 2,714 question-answer pairs.  
 Question: How big is QA-CTS task dataset?

Ex Output:
17,833 sentences, 826,987 characters and 2,714 question-answer pairs


Ex Input:
MATT-BiE-LSTM and WATT-BiE-LSTM obtain similar performances when tested on both Vader and human annotated samples, though their ways of computing the attention (weights and vectors) are different that WATT computes attention weights and the senti-emoji embeddings guided by each word, and MATT obtains the senti-emoji embedding based on the LSTM encoder on the whole contexts and computes the attention weights of the senti-emoji embedding across all words. Both models outperforms the state-of-the-art baseline models including ATT-E-LSTM Attention-based LSTM with emojis:We also use the word-emoji embedding to calculate the emoji-word attention following Equation EQREF20 and EQREF21 , and the only difference is that we replace the attention-derived senti-emoji embedding with the pre-trained word-emoji embedding by fasttext, denoted as ATT-E-LSTM. LSTM with bi-sense emoji embedding (proposed): As we have introduced in Section SECREF13 , we propose two attention-based LSTM networks based on bi-sense emoji embedding, denoted as MATT-BiE-LSTM and WATT-BiE-LSTM. 
 Question: Which SOTA models are outperformed?

Ex Output:

Attention-based LSTM with emojis