instruction:
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
question:
To me, your opening sentence, "Sorry about your friend," sounds both insincere and callous. Especially when you go on to defend the criminals and vagrants that litter downtown, proclaiming that "All city centers" will devolve into chaos and violence. We are not (yet) a society without morals or standards. We need not devolve into some sort of urban jungle. For myself, I choose to remain hopeful even when it seems that the good people of Eugene are "tolerant" to the point of their own collective suicide.
answer:
Yes


question:
Sorry Old Soul, I disagree and reality is not on the side of your argument. Women ARE the only people who can reproduce, men being only reproductive. The law is contrived and based on outmoded ideas including the institution of marriage--a throwback to the days of women being unable to own property, work outside the home, etc. 
It seems to me that with the inviolable right to abortion (currently it is a right that is routinely violated, but the US is obviously a backward country) comes the obligation for women to acknowledge that when they choose to allow a pregnancy to come to term and produce a child, they bear the sole responsibility for raising the child. Should they choose to allow another person involvement in the raising of the child, the biological father--whoever--that is their prerogative. To the extent the biological father is involved I would assume that it is contingent upon his active participation. There could be circumstances where the father parents on his own.
answer:
No


question:
You cherry pick the parts of the Bible you like, and judge gays for doing the same.   I know many Christians who would call you a Jezebel for claiming to have authority over men.   That is fine with me, but your hypocrisy isn't.  And if you are going to flag people who state this simple fact we will flag you into oblivion as well...
answer:

Yes