Given a document and an entity the task is to select the author's sentiment towards the entity. Sentiments can be Positive, Neutral and Negative. Select Positive if the article expresses a positive view towards the given entity or praises its quality or skills. Select Neutral if the document expresses no clear view towards the entity or has equal amounts of positive and negative statements or expressing some fact/quote by someone else. Select Negative if the article expresses a negative view towards like harsh remarks, criticizing entities action/decision etc. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

Ex Input:
What is the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Hillary Clinton ? Former secretary of  state Hillary Clinton  speaks to and meets voters in Allendale  Mich.  on Nov. 7  2016. (Melina Mara/The Washington Post)
How do you write a primal scream? Because my head is about to explode over the story about alleged sexual harassment on  Hillary Clintonâs  2008 presidential campaign and  her  appallingly mild response  then and now.
To recap  while we were still reeling from the report that President Trump ordered the firing of special counsel Robert S. Mueller III last summer  the New York Times posted this: âHillary Clinton Chose to Shield a Top Adviser Accused of Harassment in 2008.â
According to the Timesâ Maggie Haberman and Amy Chozick  Burns Strider   Clintonâs  faith adviser â yes  faith adviser  you canât make this stuff up â was accused of repeatedly sexually harassing a young woman with whom he shared a campaign office. The Times: â She  told a campaign official that Mr. Strider had rubbed  her  shoulders inappropriately  kissed  her  on the forehead and sent  her  a string of suggestive emails.â
The campaignâs response? Campaign manager Patti Solis Doyle recommended that Strider be fired. So did Jess OâConnell  the national director of operations  who handled the investigation. And  Clinton  herself? Not so much  apparently. The young woman  not identified in the story  was moved to a different job. Strider â then married  by the way â was âdocked several weeks of pay and ordered to undergo counseling.â Which  predictably  he never attended.
And  even more predictably  when he was hired years later to oversee an independent group backing  Clintonâs  second presidential campaign  âHe was fired after several months for workplace issues  including allegations that he harassed a young female aide  according to three people close to Correct the Recordâs management.â
This is head-exploding stuff  but thereâs worse to come. Because now â now  after Harvey Weinstein and #MeToo and Roy Moore â this was Hillary Clintonâs belated response  in its bland totality: âA story appeared today about something that happened in 2008. I was dismayed when it occurred  but was heartened the young woman came forward  was heard  and had her concerns taken seriously and addressed.â
And classically  infuriatingly  this episode and its aftermath exposes  once again  the trademark Clinton failure to take personal responsibility; the allergy to owning up to error; the refusal to cede any ground  no less apologize; the incessant double-standarding  with different  more forgiving rules for the Clintons and their loyalists. Imagine a Hillary Clinton who said something like this:
Imagine that Hillary Clinton. She doesnât exist.

Ex Output:
Negative


Ex Input:
What is the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Deval Patrick ? GOVERNOR TURNS UP THE HEAT ON BAKER
 Governor Deval Patrick Wednesday took some of his most pointed shots yet at Republican gubernatorial rival Charles D. Baker Jr.  accusing the former chief executive of Harvard Pilgrim Health Care of doing nothing to stop dramatic increases in health care costs that he said are crushing small businesses and families.
 "Today's events represent a clear example of the choices Massachusetts voters have before them in this election " said the appeal from Patrick's campaign manager  Sydney Asbury. "Governor Patrick and Lieutenant Governor Murray care about working people and take on entrenched and powerful interests on their behalf  while other candidates are either beholden to those interests or too timid to do anything about the problems facing our Commonwealth."
 Patrick's aggressive tack seemed to mark a new  more heated phase of the campaign  on the same day a new poll showed Baker gaining ground on Patrick. Baker's campaign manager  Lenny Alcivar  said on Twitter that Patrick's comments were sad and that the governor had been "reduced from testimony to meltdown  to empty campaign fund-raising ploy in minutes."
 "The governor had 3? years to take action on health care costs  but he didn't " Alcivar said. "For 3? years  Deval Patrick had the existing authority to do something  anything to address this problem  and he wouldn't. Today  hours after waking up to polling results that show his reelection prospects dwindling by the minute  Governor Patrick was forced to testify on a proposal aimed more toward salvaging his political career than helping small businesses."
 Patrick's comments were notable  because he often passes up opportunities to directly engage his challengers  particularly when at the State House.
 But he seized the chance Wednesday  after speaking in support of a bill he filed that would allow state regulators to reject "unreasonable or excessive" cost increases from hospitals and other health care providers.
 "While we've been dealing with this crisis  at least one of the candidates in this race has been in the middle of this industry and hasn't offered any solutions yet " the governor said  taking aim at Baker.
 The Rasmussen Reports automated telephone survey of likely voters showed Patrick earning 35 percent of the vote  compared with 32 percent for Baker and 19 percent for state Treasurer Timothy P. Cahill  who is running as an independent. The poll had a margin of error of plus or minus 4? percentage points. A Rasmussen survey in November showed Patrick at 33 percent  Baker at 28 percent  and Cahill at 25 percent.
 Political analysts said Patrick is trying to more actively define Baker in the minds of voters before Baker can introduce himself on his own terms.
 "Given the Rasmussen poll today essentially showing a dead heat  it's clear that Governor Patrick really has to step up and go on offense more  not only touting what he's done  but go on offense against his real challenger in this race  and that's Charlie Baker " said Mary Anne Marsh  a Democratic political strategist. "It signals a stage in this race  and it shows you we'll see an even more aggressive Deval Patrick going into the spring and the summer."
 The Patrick campaign has been honing two main lines of attack against Baker as it looks toward the November election. One is to tie Baker to the exorbitant cost increases of the Big Dig  whose finances Baker helped oversee as the top budget aide to governors William F. Weld and Paul Cellucci in the 1990s.
 "They talk about why it is they can't help but charge double-digit increases every year to small businesses and families " Patrick said. "Those small business and families don't have a voice at the table. They have my voice at that table."
 Baker's running mate  Senate minority leader Richard R. Tisei  Republican of Wakefield  joined Alcivar in dismissing Patrick's comments as a political ploy. "The governor is really electioneering  instead of taking a more thoughtful approach " he said.

Ex Output:
Neutral


Ex Input:
What is the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Natalia Veselnitskaya ? In a meeting at Trump Tower in New York last year   Natalia Veselnitskaya  produced a memo that she had shared with one of Russia's most powerful officials  prosecutor general Yury Chaika  a close ally of President Vladimir Putin  the Times reported.
Putin repeated the charges contained in the memo last week when he addressed a conference of Western scholars. Russia's state-run television has also reported on the issue in interviews with  Veselnitskaya  and Chaika.
In her memo   Veselnitskaya  accused an American firm  Ziff Brothers Investments  of illegally buying shares of a Russian firm and avoiding tens of millions of dollars in Russian taxes.
"The company was the financial vehicle of three billionaire brothers  two of them major donors to Democratic candidates including Mrs. Clinton. By implication   Ms. Veselnitskaya   said  those political contributions were tainted by 'stolen' money '" the Times reported.

Ex Output:

Neutral