The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.

[Q]: Context: 'Not bad, yourself?' 'Pretty good. The kids are looking forward to this weekend's camping trip. ' 'I see, thankfully I do not have any.'
Utterance: 'yeah we got a lot of things planned for them at the campgrounds. they're going to be pretty busy'
[A]: No


[Q]: Context: 'okay well I will take 2 foods and 2 firewoods then ' 'Thank you so much for understanding, I'm fine with that.' 'I guess that works out good because I need firewood to cook the extra food'
Utterance: 'I get it as you will be having additional packages of food, so I will have only 1 of each'
[A]: No


[Q]: Context: 'oh no I'm so sorry to hear that. My kid are looking forward to the ghost stories around the campfire.' 'My kids will enjoy that as well. I'm hoping I can pack several extra things of firewood. If I could get 3 more packages I would feel better about having enough firewood to have campfires during the evening and to cook on. ' 'ok I completely understand. I am more than happy to offer you 3 firewood in exchange for 3 food. If you are ok with splitting 2 water for me and 1 for you that works well. My kids need food and water for their medications.'
Utterance: 'Hmm I will consider it. I'm worried about not having enough food for my kids. They seem to be on a growing spurt and get very frustrated quickly when they are hungry. I would be will to negotiate it I can get 3 firewood, 1 food, and 1 water. '
[A]:
Yes