We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

[EX Q]: Sent1: Read the article, it is about why guns are vilified and the evil deadly cars that kill far more kids then guns are not!
 Sent2: The fact that you like cars is why you will tolerate the fact that more kids are killed by cars then guns.
[EX A]: Similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: The only case you could possibly make is more accidents with more guns at gun shows.
 Sent2: The only way the person would get the gun back is if the person was found not guilty.
[EX A]: Not similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: They didn't shoot someone because they were criminals, they because criminals because they shot someone, Your point boils down to 'Laws do not work because people disobey them-we should have no laws'.
 Sent2: That most people can't be trusted, so we should have more laws against guns, which most people will abide by because they can be trusted.
[EX A]:
Not similar