In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

[EX Q]: Comment: "the men"? You mean the bishops? Prove they don't love homosexuals. Prove it. Homosexual activity is evil. Its simple. All people are to be loved, not used as objects. Homosexual activity uses another person as an object to masturbate with.  Not so nice!
[EX A]: Identity-attack

[EX Q]: Comment: Democrat mantra: “If you’re not pro gay…stay the hell away."
[EX A]: Identity-attack

[EX Q]: Comment: lol, please don't be so blind.  Perhaps if Hillary won the election I would be concerned about her Uranium sale but she didn't.  The Donald did who probably owes a lot of Exxon, and has appointed the former head of Exxon to be his sec. of state.   Wonder how much moeny he will make when sanctions are dropped and Exxon is allowed to deveop those rights?
[EX A]:
Non-identity-attack