In this task, you will be presented with a context from an academic paper and a question based on the context. You have to classify the questions into "Extractive", "Abstractive", or "Yes-no" questions. Extractive questions can be answered by concatenating extracts taken from a context into a summary while answering abstractive questions involves paraphrasing the context using novel sentences. Yes-no question is a question whose expected answer is one of two choices, one that affirms the question and one that denies the question. Typically, the choices are either yes or no.

[Q]: Our work is further connected to the topic of interpretability and transparency of machine learning models BIBREF11, BIBREF35, BIBREF12, for which humans are increasingly involved, for instance for post-hoc evaluations of the model's interpretability.  
 Question: How are the interpretability merits of the approach demonstrated?
[A]: Abstractive


[Q]: A causal attribution dataset is a collection of text pairs that reflect cause-effect relationships proposed by humans (for example, “virus causes sickness”). These written statements identify the nodes of the network (see also our graph fusion algorithm for dealing with semantically equivalent statements) while cause-effect relationships form the directed edges (“virus” $\rightarrow $ “sickness”) of the causal attribution network. 
 Question: What are causal attribution networks?
[A]: Abstractive


[Q]: We evaluate the sequence-to-sequence QRNN architecture described in SECREF5 on a challenging neural machine translation task, IWSLT German-English spoken-domain translation, applying fully character-level segmentation.  
 Question: What languages pairs are used in machine translation?
[A]:
Extractive