Given a document and an entity the task is to select the author's sentiment towards the entity. Sentiments can be Positive, Neutral and Negative. Select Positive if the article expresses a positive view towards the given entity or praises its quality or skills. Select Neutral if the document expresses no clear view towards the entity or has equal amounts of positive and negative statements or expressing some fact/quote by someone else. Select Negative if the article expresses a negative view towards like harsh remarks, criticizing entities action/decision etc. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

Q: What is the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Phillips ? Jack Phillips  proprietor  of Masterpiece Cakeshop  refused to create a wedding cake ordered for a same-sex marriage on grounds that it would force  him  to create a cake expressing a value opposed to  his  Christian convictions. The gay men who ordered the cake filed a sexual orientation discrimination claim against  him  with the Colorado Civil Rights Commission  and the Commission ruled against  Phillips .
It was clear that this was not a matter of  Phillips  refusing to do business with these men because they are gay.  He  offered to make them any cake they wanted  just not one designed for a same-sex wedding.
 Phillips  claims  his  right of free expression under the Constitution's First Amendment.
Some not sympathetic to  Phillips ' claim argue that making a cake is not artistic expression and has nothing to do with speech protected by the First Amendment.
By this standard  how can we possibly rationalize forcing  Phillips  to produce a cake against  his  will  expressing a value anathema to  his  religion?
How can forcing  Phillips  to do this be understood in any way as securing for  him  "the blessings of liberty"?

A: Neutral
****
Q: What is the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Yngve Slyngstad ? Norway ’ s $ 1 trillion sovereign wealth fund will this year step up its assessment of the risks posed by climate change to its investments in power producers   oil firms and basic materials companies   its CEO told Reuters on Tuesday . Separately   the board of the central bank will soon decide whether to blacklist from the fund one or more companies -- either in the oil   steel or concrete sectors -- for producing too much greenhouse gases   the central bank chief told Reuters . The fund   which invests the proceeds from Norway ’ s oil and gas production for future pensions in stocks   bonds and real estate abroad   is one of the world ’ s biggest shareholders   with stakes totaling 1 . 4 percent of all listed companies . In recent years the world ’ s biggest sovereign wealth fund has become a more active shareholder   trying to influence companies ’ attitudes . Among them are the way companies report on climate change   such as their carbon dioxide emissions   or whether companies have scenario analyses of how more heatwaves   droughts or floods might affect their earnings .  Chief Executive Yngve Slyngstad  said the fund would first focus  its  efforts on electricity producers . “ That is ... the sector that we will first go through and think about in this scenario . The two next ones will be ( basic ) materials and oil .” “ By far the largest ... is electricity producers   which of course has been a specific focus for us because of the so - called coal criteria  ” he said referring to the fund not being allowed by parliament to invest in firms that derive more than 30 percent of their revenue from coal . The proposal to potentially exclude one or more companies in the oil   steel or cement sectors over excessive greenhouse gas emissions is under review by the board of the central bank . “ We have received some recommendations on potential exclusions based on that new criteria . The board is working on the issues ... It ’ s not going to be long  ” central bank governor Oeystein Olsen said   declining to give a more precise timeframe . Slideshow ( 2 Images ) The moves come as the fund is proposing to drop oil and gas stocks from its benchmark index   which would reduce over time its stakes in oil and gas companies . That proposal is under consideration at the finance ministry and will be voted by parliament at a later stage . DOUBLED ITS RETURN IN 2017 Also on Tuesday   the fund said it doubled its return on investment in 2017   beating its benchmark   as strong global stock markets boosted the value of the portfolio . It earned a return of 13 . 7 percent in 2017   up from 6 . 9 percent in 2016 . “ The fund ’ s cumulative return since inception has passed 4   000 billion Norwegian crowns ($ 511 billion ). One out of four crowns of return was generated in 2017   after a very strong year for the fund  ” Slyngstad said in a statement . “ Again   our equity investments returned strongest with a return close to 20 percent .” The fund ’ s biggest single company investment at the end of 2017 was in Apple Inc ( AAPL . O )  worth 66 billion crowns   ahead of Nestle ( NESN . S ) at 51 billion and Royal Dutch Shell ( RDSa . L ) at 50 billion . Apple was also the biggest single contributor to the fund ’ s returns in 2017   ahead of Chinese tech group Tencent Holdings ( 0700 . HK ) and Microsoft ( MSFT . O ). The fund ’ s size is equivalent to $ 200   000 for every Norwegian man   woman and child . The government withdrew 61 billion crowns during 2017 to pay for public expenses   compared with 101 billion crowns in 2016 .  Slyngstad  earned an annual salary of 6 . 7 million crowns   or roughly $ 855   000   in 2017   while  his  chief investment officer for equity strategies   Petter Johnsen   earned more   with 7 . 4 million crowns . By comparison   the country ’ s prime minister   Erna Solberg   earned 1 . 6 million crowns .

A: Neutral
****
Q: What is the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Marilyn Hartman ? Marilyn Hartman  66   faces a felony theft charge in connection with flying to the United Kingdom on a British Airways jet without a $2 400 plane ticket and a misdemeanor trespass charge in connection with getting into the airport illegally. In a hearing Saturday afternoon  a judge ordered  her  released on  her  own recognizance  but ordered  her  to undergo psychiatric treatment and stay away from OâHare and any British Airways planes.
 Hartman  also will be required to have an ankle monitor until the conclusion of  her  case.
âThere is no pun intended for your client  but  she  is a flight risk given the number of offenses â Judge Stephanie K. Miller said to Hartmanâs court-appointed attorney.
Dressed in a dark gray sweater and wearing black-framed eyeglasses   Hartman  said nothing during the hearing  but  her  lips curled into a smile after the judge granted  her  release.
 Hartman  used  her  hair to hide  her  face and walk past two federal TSA Precheck agents who were checking boarding passes around 2 p.m. on Jan. 14 at O'Hare  prosecutors said Saturday.
After entering a security checkpoint   she  then went to a terminal and tried to board a plane to Connecticut  but as  she  tried to âdart aroundâ another passenger in line   she  was stopped by a flight agent and told to sit down  Assistant Stateâs Attorney Maria McCarthy told the court.
 Hartman  got onto a shuttle bus to the International Terminal and slept there overnight  prosecutors said.
The next day   Hartman  managed to get past British Airways ticket agents and a Customs and Border Patrol officer  and onto a plane  prosecutors said.  She  sat in an empty seat and flew to Londonâs Heathrow Airport  but when  she  showed  her  documents to a Customs agent   she  was identified as someone who entered England without proper documentation  McCarthy said.
 Hartman   of the 100 block of Hamelitz Court in Grayslake  was flown back to OâHare  and Chicago police and other officials were waiting for  her  when  she  arrived  prosecutors said.  She  later admitted to boarding the London-bound flight without buying a ticket  McCarthy added.
 Hartman âs movements through the airport were captured on high-definition surveillance video  according to authorities.
The TSA is investigating how  Hartman  was able to get through security  a spokesman said in a statement Friday.
This is  Hartman âs first arrest in Chicago since 2016  but  she  has a long history of trying to sneak onto airplanes.
 Hartman  was given probation when  she  originally was sentenced after pleading guilty in a February 2016 trespassing charge  but  she  was sentenced to 364 days in jail a few weeks later  according to court records.  She  was credited for 23 days already served and could have spent less than six months in jail if given credit for good behavior  according to court records.
At the time  she  was sentenced to jail   Hartman  had been living at a mental health facility on the Near North Side before violating the terms of  her  probation by leaving the facility and going to OâHare.
 Hartman  has been detained several times across the country for trying to bypass airport security. In a court filing after  her  arrest in July 2015 at O'Hare on trespass charges  Cook County prosecutors described  Hartman  as a "serial stowaway."  She  told NBC-Ch. 5 in December 2015 that  she  "may have" boarded planes without a ticket eight times.
 Hartman  also has three misdemeanor convictions for similar crimes in California  McCarthy said.

A:
Positive
****