instruction:
The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the no-need strategy, otherwise output No. no-need is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used when a participant points out that they do not need an item based on personal context such as suggesting that they have ample water to spare. no-need can directly benefit the opponent since it implies that the item is up for grabs.
question:
Context: 'I'm like that as well, a small appetite.' 'I need firewood the least of all though, because I have a lot of coats for warmth.' 'Are you bringing several coats while camping?'
Utterance: 'Yeah, I might even have too many.I still need water the most,so I'm thinking I should take the water and you should take the firewood.'
answer:
Yes


question:
Context: 'I have a medical condition that causes my veins to close up when I get too cold. I will thus need the 3 firewood.' '☹️Oh, that sounds awful. Are you sure you need all three packages of firewood?'
Utterance: 'I might be able to get by with just two... I'm on a diet though, so I don't need as much food.'
answer:
Yes


question:
Context: 'one food is not enough i am pregnant and i need to eat many meals' 'My friend is ill and needs to eat to survive. How about I take 3 water then and you can have 2 food and all of the wood?' 'sounds reasonable'
Utterance: 'Great! glad we could come to an agreement. May I ask why you are camping while pregnant?'
answer:

No