Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.

Input: Consider Input: Hot doesn't necessarily mean there is a fire hazard. Conditions in the forest have to be very dry, and that wasn't the case back in the 70's and 80's. Then it was hot but the forests were still wet. The trees weren't dried out. So while the weather may be similar, the climate can still be different and its the changing climate leading to increased fire hazard.

Output: No


Input: Consider Input: HOW in the heck can anyone from Alaska even begin to think there is no global warming? I live in the same town, Wasilla, and we are having one heck of an early spring. Beyond anything I've seen in my 38 years in Alaska. It is really nice outside and as for global warming and living in Alaska, bring it on! lol....

Output: Yes


Input: Consider Input: Garland supported the D.C. gun ban in 2007, thereby showing he opposes self-defense and opposes the 2nd Amendment right to keep and bear arms. This exposed Garland as a left-wing loon activist unworthy of sitting in judgment on any court bench. I will support the GOP on saving tax payer funding on hearings blocking such left wing activist lunatics. No shame in this. Besides Harry Reid and the democrats Obstructionism set a model in place to follow.


Output: Yes