Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.

I think the world's most profitable companies should pitch in and buy the LIO for the legislature as a "thank you" gift, for SB21, ACES, the PPT, and other giveaways over the last 20 years or so.  They could give it to the state of Alaska as a whole, so it wouldn't technically be bribery---And it'd be giving something back, after many years of dedication on the part of the legislature.

Conocophillips, BP, Exxonmobile---What about it?  Are you going to let your lapdogs hang, or come to their rescue and save us all a lot of embarrassment?
Yes

Supposedly, HB 2960, which established this program provides that "(n) Provide that the State of Oregon and employers that participate in the plan have no proprietary interest in the contributions to or earnings on amounts contributed to accounts established under the plan."

Of course, that is a Legislative Law; they can change it any time Senator Prozanski or Representative Barnhart or any other Democrat decides that  they need more money for one of their programs; they are in the Majority and can just slap the Emergency Clause on new Legislation anytime they feel like it and do whatever they please because the Republicans have no say and the people can't do an Initiative to stop them.
Yes

So an income tax isn't acceptable, but a 35% tax on the PFD is? Perhaps it looks attractive to you because the PFD to you is a bit of extra money, a nice little bonus to give yourself a treat. You have no clue that there are many households, mostly in the Bush, for whom the PFD is a large part of the yearly income. Cutting that income by 35% is going to mean less , food, fuel, clothing, all the little things that Mr. Olsen takes for granted. 

So once again we have a clueless, tone deaf, Republican more than willing to take from the poor to give to the rich.  It's high time for a change.

Yes