We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Q: Sent1: The crimes meriting the death penalty are by-and-large not commited by those considering the consequences, no matter what those consequences may be.
 Sent2: That should be a crime which should result in the death penalty.

A: Not similar
****
Q: Sent1: If we sentence someone to life in prison, we can always free them at a later time if they are found to be innocent.
 Sent2: As long as we sentence people to a life in prison we are also GUARANTEED to sentence an innocent person.

A: Not similar
****
Q: Sent1: We make ourselves less by doing the same as the murder convict - that is, not valuing a human life.
 Sent2: There should no be a death penalty, since by taking a human's life, we are not saving it.

A:
Similar
****