TASK DEFINITION: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: threat and non-threat. Threat is a statement that someone will be hurt or harmed, especially if the person does not do something in particular.
PROBLEM: Comment: Well, I left your opinion up ~ much as it doesn't matter. Guess you do not like the Scuttlebut I hear at counter regarding you from co-workers. You sure getting flamed here too. Dopers just like to act up. Good prescription for you ~ Take a couple grains of salt  and pop a few Midol....  What's wrong... You sound like one of this Quacks "customers"? Now trouble making a score... Go to the Far Back Corner Under Your Bridge Troll. Don't forget your hat. Delete after you read, cause I know you will.
Then just shut that big mouth and go away. Just like the guys at the shop wish you would.

SOLUTION: Non-threat

PROBLEM: Comment: I have come to think that "...the infusion of grace by means of the sacraments properly dispensed" is, in large part, self serving ecclesiastical claptrap (I actually would use a much stronger word beginning with "B", but that one wouldn't pass the censors).

SOLUTION: Non-threat

PROBLEM: Comment: Maybe you forgot about this twit that went to supreme court so she could wear a rag on her face during the swearing in ceremony.  She wasn't even Canadian yet, but she decided to force us to pander to her silly whims.   If I wanted to show up at the swearing in ceremony wearing a thong and flip flops because I feel more comfortable in them, should I be sworn in as a Canadian?   Should the media make that a major political debate?  Why did this get to supreme court?   This was not a suppression of religion.  Here is an example of our country being changed.

SOLUTION:
Non-threat