We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Sent1: i think the death penalty should be abolished because some people are sentenced to deathfor a crime they might have not committed.
 Sent2: The person having been convicted of a crime punishable by death and subsequently sentenced to death should be put to death.
Not similar

Sent1: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time.
 Sent2: That right to life was taken away, I agree, but we will not accomplish anything if we kill someone else.
Not similar

Sent1: If it has nothing to do with the death penalty, how could it have anything to do with lives saved by the death penalty in the first place?
 Sent2: Bleeding hearts will not accept the fact that the death penalty is a deterrent and saves innocent lives.

Not similar