Categorize the comment on the basis of toxicity. If the comment is toxic (harmful, malicious, derogatory, threat, insult, identity attck, etc.) output Yes, otherwise output No.

Ex Input:
And how much CO2 is absorbed and converted into life sustaining O2 by a single tree? I don't know that info but certainly planting trees to replace all the ones we cut down would definitely help, and the cost wouldn't be ridiculous.

Ex Output:
Yes


Ex Input:
Arun makes a number of good points and offers a perspective that undermines the demagogues of the right. The right loves simple easy answers to complex problems.  They miss their responsibility for creating the conditions that make for a rich soup of angry people who don't see any way out.  Of course we all know that the Iraqi war was the worst response, particular how the first six months were handled. Bush's team was arrogant. Blackwater was arrogant.  Debathification was stupid, and arrogant.  They left stock piles of bombs around Bagdad that slowly dissolved to become IEDs. And throughout this the words of support for Islam were undermined by the radical right.  And it's gotten worse, much worse as Fox and team rally their troops to undermine considered actions that could both reduce the hatred and tension and increase our ability to deal with extremists on both ends...great insights!

Ex Output:
Yes


Ex Input:
Reckless ignorance allows for an recklessly ignorant (loud) voice!  Here's to independence and reckless abandon.

Ex Output:

Yes