TASK DEFINITION: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.
PROBLEM: You can't limit appeals because people have been redeemed in their 3rd and 4th appeals.

SOLUTION: Valid

PROBLEM: You see, the people who cite what they would actually DO with guns cite all the wrong reasons, like protecting themselves from the state and similar.

SOLUTION: Invalid

PROBLEM: I'm not necessarily disagreeing with you, I do agree with the death penalty, but why should a child's life be worth more than any adult?

SOLUTION:
Valid