In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: insult and non-insult. Insult is any lanugage or act that is disrespectful or scornfully abusive.
--------
Question: Comment: All methods of reducing dental decay should be employed - It's something to consider.

Explain how, when water containing 0.7 mg/l fluoride ions has never been considered a medication, fluoridation opponents can claim the water treatment method is forced medication.  It would be like me claiming disinfection is forced poisoning and demanding that it be stopped.  Chlorine gas is a known chemical weapon, bleach is a strong poison that no one would want to drink, and studies on disinfection byproducts have shown they are poisonous at high exposure levels - would you want to drink a glass of chloroform?

Fluoridation opponents invent definitions to fit their agenda when there is absolutely no support for those claims.

Answer: Non-insult


Question: Comment: Idjit Mkhize., to the students, “Here is the torch; it is your turn to carry it forth.”
Here let me complete the sentence for you, 'Here is the torch; it is your turn to carry it forth.............and burn everything to the ground, Universities, schools, nursery schools, bus and train stations (and the buses and the trains), municipal offices, libraries, parliamentary buildings, Luthuli house, sports stadiums, taxis and farms and any other structure you would like to burn down. After all if you can't get your own way you have the right to do what you want'. (parody)
But there, I fixed it for you. Idjit.

Answer: Non-insult


Question: Comment: Open all the diocesan and Vatican records that have reports of clergy sex abuse to law enforcement in the jurisdictions in which the abuse occurred.  Require bishops, heads of religious orders, and those who work for a diocese who hear of child sex abuse to report such to local law enforcement.  Stop fighting against extension of statutes of limitations so that those who were abused in the past can assure those who abused them are named and shamed as well as assure those who were abused have their stories heard.  One of the things victims want is to be heard and to have the wrong done to them acknowledged.  Another thing victims want to to be sure that the person who abused them are identified so they cannot continue abusing others.  It isn't all about the money.  

One more thought.  Before a victim signs an agreement not to pursue further legal action, the bishop should sign an affidavit that he has disclosed all information relevant to the person's claim.

Just a few thoughts.

Answer:
Non-insult