In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: threat and non-threat. Threat is a statement that someone will be hurt or harmed, especially if the person does not do something in particular.

Q: Comment: Hahahaha. Now tell us PC spokesperson pretty please, did Ms. Ambrose make the calls to the ethics people after Trudeau's vacation event became public and and turned into a cheap political play? She would have to be awfully dumb if she did not. In addition to the hypocrisy the layer of parsing non existent differences is boggling.

A: Non-threat
****
Q: Comment: And of course, the upcoming election will remind Canadians how the Liberals lied about electoral reform. Unlike the Harper government, this is a craven gang that hopes to quietly sell out the country to plutocrats and corporations while no one is looking. Trudeau is a pathetic neoliberal stooge peddling a discredited ideology. "Sunny ways" is the same trickle down economics delivered with a smile and patronizing condescension.

A: Non-threat
****
Q: Comment: "Kill them all. For the sake of all that is good and righteous. Kill them all."
I can't recall, is that from Mark or Matthew?

A:
Threat
****