We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

Ex Input:
The anti gun/gun control advocate way at dealing with deaths caused by guns is to limit the right to bear arms.

Ex Output:
Valid


Ex Input:
You're saying that the Constitution should be changed and updated to meet the times in any manner that the government believes would be in their best interest, or even repealed outright and entirely.

Ex Output:
Valid


Ex Input:
This should be a clear indicator that legal ownership of guns in no way has increased potential criminality for law abiding citizens.

Ex Output:

Valid