Given a document and an entity the task is to select the author's sentiment towards the entity. Sentiments can be Positive, Neutral and Negative. Select Positive if the article expresses a positive view towards the given entity or praises its quality or skills. Select Neutral if the document expresses no clear view towards the entity or has equal amounts of positive and negative statements or expressing some fact/quote by someone else. Select Negative if the article expresses a negative view towards like harsh remarks, criticizing entities action/decision etc. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

Input: Consider Input: What is the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Jimmy Vesey ? One of the reasons  Jimmy Vesey  didnât sign with  his  hometown Bruins when the Harvard product was a college free agent in 2016 was because  he  wanted to get out of  his  comfort zone.  He  sure looks comfortable playing against them.
 Vesey  scored twice in a 29-second span in the first period in the Rangersâ 4-2 home win Wednesday night against Boston  the Blueshirtsâ fifth straight win as they continue to distance themselves from their rough start to the year.
For Buchnevichâs fellow sophomore Vesey  Wednesday represented some progress in that he remained a contributor until the final horn. In three of the previous five games   Vesey  had either had limited third-period ice time or been benched altogether for the third.
 Jimmy Vesey  celebrates  his  first of two goals scored. (Bruce Bennett/Getty Images)
âMaybe he wasnât finishing on a lot  but  Jimmy  was working hard and  like you saw (Wednesday) early on  before he scored the goals  he made a couple real strong plays along the wall in our end that permitted us to get the puck out â Vigneault said. âSo thereâs more than just finishing.â

Output: Positive


Input: Consider Input: What is the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Tesla ? Tesla Model 3 production really is hell.
 Elon Musk  Tesla’s founder and CEO   warned us in July as  he  delivered the first 30 all-electric Model 3 cars to buyers who also happened to be employees.
SEE ALSO: Driving a Tesla Model 3 is pretty damn awesome
On Monday   Tesla  reported  it  has produced just 260 Tesla Model 3 cars   its  first mass-market all-electric sedan  in the last quarter. That’s approximately 120 cars a month  a number that would be less distressing if Musk himself hadn’t predicted producing as many as 20 000 Model 3 cars a month by December of this year.
Tesla reported half a million Model 3 pre-orders in late July. At the company’s current production pace   Tesla  Model 3 customer 500 000 might not see her all-electric sedan until the year 2363.
What’s far more likely is that it will be a few years or more before  Tesla  gets through all  its  orders  and those who ordered first will endure the highest level of frustration as their cars will probably be delayed the most. A lot of people in the middle of the product delivery queue could receive their Model 3’s at the same time and  eventually  ordering a Model 3 could be as easy and commonplace as buying a Ford Focus.
Does Musk's tendency to talk production numbers hurt Tesla? Image: lance ulanoff/mashable
There’s been a lot of calamity in the world in the last few months  but  apparently  it’s not the source of the production issues. “…there are no fundamental issues with  the Model 3 production or supply chain  ”  Tesla  said in the release.
 It  might be a while before you see your Model 3. Image: lance ulanoff/mashable
The cause is  Tesla ’s own facilities: “production bottlenecks” at both  its  Fremont production plant and the massive Gigafactory in Nevada.
Considering how much Musk said  Tesla  learned from the production hell it went through with  its  previous  Tesla  models  this is surprising. Musk recalled in July how the Roadster  its first electric car  was the worst. “We went through hell and then actually did a return journey ” Musk said  “We had to redo almost the entire car and recapitalize the company  which sucked.”
There were roughly 30 Model 3's ready to go on July 29.  Tesla  managed to produce another 230 Model 3 cars since then. Image: lance ulanoff/mashable
Doug Field   Tesla ’s VP of Engineering said they designed the Model 3 to move as quickly through production as possible  while maintaining as high production quality as possible.
Where  exactly  those production bottlenecks exist is  since Tesla isn’t saying  anyone’s guess  but it doesn’t take much to slow down a production line like this. As Musk explained in July  “There’s 10 000 unique components in the car and production will move as fast as the slowest one.”
Beyond statements made in the release   Tesla  wouldn't comment on the delays.
No matter where it is  the numbers speak for themselves: 260 Model 3 cars off the production line. Even with an S-Curve  it’s is hard to imagine that in fewer than three months   Tesla  will rocket to 20 000 a month.

Output: Positive


Input: Consider Input: What is the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Amy Webb ? Itâs not as if fake news in America came into existence alongside the tide known as the Trump presidencyâthe hucksters  foreign propagandists  conspiracy theorists  and fabricators have always been hereâbut if ever there was a year when purposefully misleading or false stories hit their stride  2017 might have been it.  We  were told that an ISIS leader was captured at a US airport  and that Shariah law was instituted in Utah and other states. A study found that 25 million votes for Hillary Clinton were âcompletely fraudulent â and the Las Vegas massacre was carried out by antifa  or ISIS  or the Illuminati  or somehow all three. The lies went on and on  picking up where 2016âs catalogue of nonsense left off. (Remember Hillary Clintonâs child sex trafficking ring run out of a pizzeria  or Sarah Palin banning Muslims from âenteringâ her daughter? How about Alec Baldwin dying  and Trump winning the electoral vote and the popular vote?)
But now  we âre at the dawn of a fresh year  privy to the forces that seek to sow confusion and outrage. Can American society overcome the fake news phenomenon?
Wellâ¦ âThereâs probably a strong case to be made that  we  are chemically addicted to fake news â says  Amy Webb   an author and futurist who founded the Future Today Institute. âWhen youâre seeing your angers and fears and anxieties being validated externally  you get a shot of dopamine.â Thinking about the upcoming year and beyond   she  says   we  may have âa huge problem on  our  hands.â And though the propaganda is coming at  us  from all directionsâfrom Kremlin-backed misinformation campaigns and Twitter troll armies to publicity hounds and political malcontentsâfalling for it  and spreading it  is to some degree our own fault.
In the spring of 2017   Webb  wrote a piece for Mother Jones that detailed not only the manner of 21st-century fake news and the speed with which it travels  but also how we are all accomplices to its proliferation âas we click and repost without considering the storyâs source and its agenda.â  She  noted that the democratization of the internet back in the 1990s meant that âeveryone would get to participate regardless of their agendas.â Information became free and free-flowing. But  problematically  âwe didnât plan ahead as the internet matured â when consumers of information were left to contend with not only âhuman arbiters of factsâ but also code and algorithms that propel certain types of content to the fore  based on our own online behavior. Innocently sharing a cat video put out by Russia Today  a Kremlin-backed propaganda machine that elevates fringe âexpertsâ and attempts to sow distrust  means youâll see a lot more of their content in the future.
Complicating matters more is that in our politicized climate  the term fake news itself came to mean different things to different people. It had a literal meaning that  seemingly overnight  became a hashtag and an epithet to hurl at anything or anyone that one disagrees with. âIf we canât even come to some kind of convergence and talk about something as insidious and as threatening to our future as the spread of misinformationâotherwise known as fake news in the literal senseâthen donât we have sort of a catastrophically huge problem on our hands?â asks  Webb .
As someone who studies current and past trends to try to anticipate what the future may hold   Webb  likes to end these conversations with a reminder that  for however doomed things appear  âWe are not living in the middle of Westworldâthe future has not been preordained. There is something we can do in the year 2018 and beyond  and that is be smarter consumers of news.â


Output: Neutral