In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

[Q]: Comment: What's gonna change on the repubs agenda. They've been doing nothing for 8 yrs, what's 4 more gonna matter.
Do nothing repub congress,  all preachy and wanna get into women's vaginas & reproductive rights.  While your base of ol white guys die off what's plan B for 2020.
[A]: Sexual-explicit


[Q]: Comment: You are truly a pessimist! I know you don't like "Pocahontas" or Chuck Schumer, but either would be a better administrator than Trump, who doesn't seem to be getting the picture. I could be wrong, but I don't think Pence has national appeal.
[A]: Non-sexual-explicit


[Q]: Comment: Its not about returning to the days when you could call anybody anything.  If the shoe fits, you wear it.  OK, let the semantics begin with you.  In today's politically  correct  climate you can call a Immoral, Promiscuous, Nasty Woman a:    Escort,  Lady of the evening,  Friend with privileges,   demimonde, sex worker,  Prostitute,  Professional in Public Relations,  and  it slides by and nobody riots in the streets,  protests, or calls you a jerk.  However, you call them a "HO", and lookout, the loud mouths crank  it up.   You are what you are, whether its politically correct or not, accept the facts and truth.   

As far as the bathroom issue, I believe a human with a penis should use the mens bathroom.     A human  with a vagina should use the womans bathroom.
[A]:
Sexual-explicit