In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

Input: Consider Input: Comment: the media and Reid is one of their ilk are masters of diversion and twisting of truth and in many cases outright fabrications.  the Mexicans are rapists is but one example

Output: Identity-attack


Input: Consider Input: Comment: Also, humility.  Garrison doesn't put on any airs.  But Mr. Keillor is a bright bulb, illuminating general human follies and particularly, the foolishness of high-falutin' folks.  His support of Hillary Clinton as an honest, hard-working, and people-oriented politician is something that has been totally lacking in our media coverage.  Clinton is a wonky gem with a heart.  D.T. is a fraud with a giant ego backed up by nothing more than intestinal gas.

Output: Non-identity-attack


Input: Consider Input: Comment: Hodes implies that by not speaking out against Zille's tweet, Jews are somehow deserving of tis horrendous tweet; specifically because Zille is Jewish. Is she not, also, say, female? English? A Capetonian?  Why impose the obligation onto Jews only? Why not attack any other group?  The truth is, there is no justification in supposing that the Jewish community needs to speak out simply because Zille is Jewish. After all, she did not speak as a Jew. Hode's contention is that Jews somehow deserved Mnxgitama’s racist tweet. That contention is in itself racist, and absurd.


Output: Identity-attack