In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.
--------
Question: Comment: Ummm . . . . we just wrapped up 8 years of Barrack Obama with his incredibly sensitive but confused, milquetoast approach to international terrorism - which only gave rise to ISIS and is fast-tracking Iran to a nuclear bomb.

I'm sorry, but it's amazing how it's always a Muslim columnist in a western newspaper or a Muslim personality on a cable news network show who are so critical of the west but so insightful with all of the answers on how the west can jump through the hoops and finally gain peace from Islam.

Hey, how about it if Islam takes the big step and turns off the flow of terror and violence upon its own people as well as the west? Muslims terrorize and kill far more Muslims than they do of westerners. Try sorting his one out for yourselves first and we'll all benefit.

Answer: Identity-attack


Question: Comment: Yes, white people who stick up for themselves are so terrible. I mean we should should just roll over and accept this new Liberalized world full of weakness and defeat in the name of tolerance.

Answer: Identity-attack


Question: Comment: Wrong. The players that take a knee are first "green" - their love of the dollar is their main driver. Second, they're black, and those who want to divide this country know that, so they're using them to spark racial tension. The whole "cops shooting blacks" is a false narrative. Thirdly, they're yellow, because they disrespect all of us by disrespecting our country. They never get close to "red, white, and blue."

Answer:
Identity-attack