We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

[Q]: Sent1: If a person wasn't convicted then they surely wouldn't be murdered by the state.
 Sent2: The government doesn't have the right to take away someone's life, even in the case of murder.
[A]: Not similar


[Q]: Sent1: I support the death penalty because I feel that their are crimes and criminals so heinous that they deserve death.
 Sent2: Some crimes are so heinous that the person who committed the crime deserves to die: I would only agree to this if the execution erased the crime that was committed in the first place.
[A]: Similar


[Q]: Sent1: There are many reasons the death penalty should be abolished.
 Sent2: If we are talking about abolishing the death penalty, then what is the point in arguing against technology that can only become more advanced?
[A]:
Not similar