TASK DEFINITION: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.
PROBLEM: Comment: I agree with you that surprise about what that man is doing is more than disingenuous.  It's actually offensive, given that 60% of white Catholics voted for him, with the backing of most of the hierarchy.  However, Maureen Fiedler was never a Trump supporter.  And, please don't give up on immigration.  There are many of us who are working to hold to as much of the law as possible.  We need as much support as possible from everyone.

SOLUTION: Non-obscene

PROBLEM: Comment: Yes, Trump read courteous statements off his teleprompter written by somebody else, but then he couldn't stop himself from a 'victory' tour and proceeded to be as divisive and vulgar as ever.  Weird dream worlds are not the sole province of progressives.  You helped elect the current nightmare.

SOLUTION: Non-obscene

PROBLEM: Comment: "Bannon damaged his standing by giving an interview to the liberal American Prospect this week in which he was seen to be undercutting Trump's position on North Korea."

Missing here is the OTHER comment made by Bannon that undercut some of Trump's base support.  Bannon called Neo-Nazis and white supremacists "clowns" in the same interview, I believe. THAT might have been the tipping point.  

About Bannon blithely stating he'll go back to Breibart?  Hmm, maybe.  Perhaps he won't be welcome there, either.  Not for his ideological beliefs, necessarily, but simply because, in his absence, the website's management has "moved on" so to speak, and he's simply not wanted on the voyage. What an irony that would be.

SOLUTION:
Non-obscene