We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

Ex Input:
The militia and the citizens at large would only carry weapons that civilized nations would use in warfare, they would not rightfully carry weapons useful only to criminals.

Ex Output:
Valid


Ex Input:
The great majority of weapons found in Mexico are coming from places beyond the American borders, everyone knows this, and there's not an ounce of hard evidence to the contrary.

Ex Output:
Valid


Ex Input:
(or, for those who favor the alternative collective right view, ���the right of militia members to keep and bear their militia arms when called for by the state for militia service?���)

Ex Output:

Valid