In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: threat and non-threat. Threat is a statement that someone will be hurt or harmed, especially if the person does not do something in particular.

[Q]: Comment: We go into their living rooms, and then kill them when they disapprove.  Amazing.
[A]: Threat


[Q]: Comment: No, members of the public who do not make nicey-face are now officially silenced.  Kidd no longer has to listen to them, she can just have them removed.

Since the point of these rules seems to be to protect Cherie Kidd from anything she finds unpleasant, I would guess that her ability to trash Council meetings, or do any other lunacy that occurs to her, will actually be more protected than it already was.
[A]: Non-threat


[Q]: Comment: A sure way to get to the truth of the matter is for any man accused of sexual misconduct be bound and gagged, and thrown into Lake Ontario . If he floats, he is guilt and goes to prison. If he drowns, clearly he is innocent and he exonerated. Surly feminists will accept the justice of that,
[A]:
Threat