Given a document and an entity the task is to select the author's sentiment towards the entity. Sentiments can be Positive, Neutral and Negative. Select Positive if the article expresses a positive view towards the given entity or praises its quality or skills. Select Neutral if the document expresses no clear view towards the entity or has equal amounts of positive and negative statements or expressing some fact/quote by someone else. Select Negative if the article expresses a negative view towards like harsh remarks, criticizing entities action/decision etc. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

[Q]: What is the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Mark Levin Unloads ? NATIONAL HARBOR  MD â Nationally syndicated radio superstar  Mark Levin  joined SiriusXM hosts Matt Boyle and Amanda House at CPAC on Breitbart News Saturday  praising President Donald Trumpâs actions for advancing conservatism  and making explosive statements about the Left  Obama and his administration  the media  guns  and Democratsâ plans to impeach the president.
 Levin  was speaking to thousands of conservatives who gathered just outside of the nationâs capital at the annual pilgrimage for the conservative movement. Boyle and House were broadcasting live from CPAC  as the âGreat Oneâ sat down with them to reflect on President Trumpâs speech to the conference on Friday  and examining the first year of the Trump administration.
âThis president is so different â  Levin  began. â He  threw out the written speech and  he  said  âLet me talk to you.ââ
â He  connects with you individually â the former Reagan administration senior aide continued  making the observation of the president that  â he  talks like a regular person â as opposed to a polished politician with a team of handlers.
Boyle and Houseâwho respectively are the political editor and deputy political editor of Breitbart Newsâinvited  Levin  to unpack  his  thoughts on how the presidentâs actions stack up with conservative priorities  given  Levin âs pedigree and well-earned reputation as one of the foremost champions of constitutional conservatism. Levin dedicates much of the time on  his  wildly successful radio show holding accountable public officials who stray from conservative priorities.
âWhich is fine by me â  Levin  commented to Boyle and House  âbecause itâs the end result that matters.â
It is no secret that  Levin  does not agree with President Trump on everything. âBut I didnât agree with Reagan on everything â either   Levin  noted  a comparison noteworthy because of the tremendous respect  Levin  has for the nationâs 40th president  under whom  he  served.
 Levin   Boyle  and House then turned to the red-hot issues that are currently dominating the headlines  and explaining what is behind those narratives.
âIf the Democrats take the House  theyâre going to move to impeach this president  to reverse the results of the election â  Levin  claimed. âTheyâve been into this silent coup since the day he was elected. They are furious that he is president of the United States.â
 Levin  called Special Counsel Robert Mueller a âhit manâ and compared Muellerâs investigation to a âmob operation.â
âThis is a grotesque miscarriage of justice â  Levin  insists. âSomething about this stinks to high heaven.â
 Levin  said that  he  noticed a pattern  relying upon  his  experience as a top Justice Department official.  He  recalled the moment during the 2016 election when  he  concluded  âweâve got domestic surveillance of Trump World.â
 Levin  insists that this was âpolitical domestic surveillance â and that a host of characters  from the Obama White House  to top officials in the Obama-Lynch Justice Department  to leaders at the FBI  must have known about it when it was happening.
There are âhardcore anti-constitutional progressive leftistsâ who are out to get President Trump  and the entire conservative agenda would be endangered if the presidentâs enemies succeed   Levin  warned.
[A]: Neutral


[Q]: What is the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Shahid Khaqan Abbasi ? ISLAMABAD (Reuters) -  Pakistani Prime Minister Shahid Khaqan Abbasi  on Monday said  his  government will push ahead with plans to seize control of charities run by an Islamist designated a terrorist by Washington  and warned the United States not to weaken Pakistan.
 Abbasi  brushed off U.S. President Donald Trumpâs recent tweet accusing Pakistan of âlies and deceptionâ in its commitment to fighting terrorism  as  he  raised the prospect of charging the United States to use Pakistanâs airspace to resupply NATO troops in Afghanistan.
 Abbasi  said Pakistan had made progress in curbing terrorist financing after meetings with the Financial Action Task Force (FATF)  an international body that warned Islamabad could be put on a watchlist for not doing enough to stop the practice.
 Pakistani Prime Minister Shahid Khaqan Abbasi  speaks during an interview with Reuters in Islamabad  Pakistan January 22  2018. REUTERS/Caren Firouz
âWeâve had several meetings on that  and from what Iâve seen a large part of those actions have been taken â  Abbasi  said.
 Former petroleum minister Abbasi  said any sanctions against Pakistan would be counter-productive to the countryâs own battle against Islamist militants  which  he  called âthe largest war on terror in the worldâ.
âAny constraints put on Pakistan  actually only serve to degrade our capability to fight the war against terror â  he  said.
 Abbasi  said Trumpâs tweet was âunacceptableâ in its tone and that Pakistan should not be âscapegoatedâ for U.S. failures in Afghanistan.
âThat is something ... we cannot accept because nobodyâs suffered more than Pakistan â  Abbasi  said  adding that tens of thousands of Pakistani have died from militancy that has inflicted damage worth $120 billion to the economy.
 Abbasi  said much of the suspended aid was from the Coalition Support Fund (CSF)  a U.S. Defence Department program to reimburse allies for the costs of supporting counter-terrorist and counter-insurgency operations.
 He  said the U.S. needed to respect Pakistanâs contribution to the fight against Islamist militancy and raised the prospect of charging Washington for air transport flights that have been resupplying U.S.-led troops and Afghan forces in landlocked Afghanistan.
âIf somebody wants to start quantifying expenses and aid  I think letâs put this on the table also. Letâs discuss that â  Abbasi  said  though  he  added that such talk was âhypotheticalâ.
 Abbasi  dismissed media reports that Islamabad has ended intelligence sharing with the U.S. military as false.
And  he  also spoke fondly about a brief discussion  he  had with Trump in September at a reception at the U.N General Assembly in New York.
âI found  him  to be fairly warm â  he  said. âSomebody that you would like to engage with and talk to.â
[A]: Neutral


[Q]: What is the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Nancy Pelosi ? House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi  missed the mark in  her  interpretation of the Concealed Carry Reciprocity Act  voted into law by Republicans last week. That legislation   Pelosi  declared on Twitter  comes with some unwanted invitations.
Yet the @HouseGOP just voted to do exactly that #StopCCR â Nancy Pelosi (@NancyPelosi) December 6  2017
The Washington Post Fact Checker gave  Pelosi  three Pinocchios for the misleading tweet. Contrary to the picture  Pelosi  tried to paint  federal law already prohibits violent criminals from obtaining guns.
 The House Minority Leader  was supposedly relying on information  she  obtained from the gun control group Everytown for Gun Safety  which declared that the bill âforces" states to allow concealed carry by many people who have never been subjected to a background check to carry throughout the country.
 Pelosi  earned the third Pinocchio  however  thanks to  her  last line.
âWe wavered between Two and Three Pinocchios but ultimately settled on Three because  her  last line â 'the @House GOP just voted to do exactly that' â is so over the top and exaggerated â the Fact Checker explained.
[A]:
Neutral