We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Input: Consider Input: Sent1: That pretty much boiled down to laws against felons having weapons, laws against the mentally defective having weapons, and laws against carrying weapons in sensitive places.
 Sent2: And where laws were passed, the gun lobby has had success in watering those laws down.

Output: Not similar


Input: Consider Input: Sent1: If this is the case then gun control laws will have no effect on who carries melee weapons, so you argument falls apart because 'the law abiding' can remain armed.
 Sent2: IF you previously had laws that made openly carrying weapons illegal, and you then pass a concealed carry law, if somebody is carrying a gun and it is not concealed, they are breaking the law.

Output: Not similar


Input: Consider Input: Sent1: Look at any country that has significantly tighter gun control laws than America, go far enough back and you'll eventually see that gun control was very simple at first.
 Sent2: I really do not care particularly what gun control laws states or cities pass.


Output: Not similar