The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.
--------
Question: Context: 'I'm glad you understand my problem. But I really need those 3 firewood packages. I'd be happy to give you 2 water packages and all the food in exchange.' 'Initially you were willing to take the 2 packages of firewood. If you have all three I won't be able to cook any of this fish and it will all go to waste. ☹️' 'Didn't you bring any firewood at all with you?'
Utterance: 'Yes, but the firewood I have will be used to keep us warm tonight.  Like you mentioned before it will be a bit chilly tonight.'

Answer: Yes


Question: Context: 'Can i have 2 firewood, 2 food and 1 water' 'That can work. That seems like a good solution to the problem.🙂' 'Ok I hope you are okay with that. Please confirm!'
Utterance: 'Okay, I will confirm that. Thanks! 🙂'

Answer: No


Question: Context: 
Utterance: 'Hey, I was thinking that I could take all of the food items, and 2 of the firewood items. My friend has low blood sugar and they need the food in case they crash, and the warmth of the fire to maintain at evening.'

Answer:
Yes