Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.

Example Input: Automation has been in use in Europe for years...long before our debate about $15 hr...never been able to figure out why they get tech long before we do.
They were using card chips long before us also...in a completely different way...waiter comes to table with wireless scanner, scans card and immediately hands it back...completely opposite of our use of the chip, where we put card in, complete transaction , take card out. Leave it up to us to screw that up too.
Back to the point - lol - at McD's across euro, enter order at kiosk, get receipt number, pick up at counter. Talk about efficient. Hey, did I mention how much better euro Big Macs taste than ours? Ok, I guess I've digressed enough :)
Example Output: No

Example Input: Sooner later we'll have to stand up to the troublemakers.
Example Output: Yes

Example Input: Spy vs. Spy - except it's idiots vs. idiots. Those poor people who were forcibly involved, by having their address posted online - when they had nothing to do with what was going on.  What we should do is not bring in 'more cops' rather take away all the current laws that we have and instead make "being stupid" a crime; where your actions are deemed 'stupid' or 'not stupid' by a jury of your peers.
Example Output:
Yes