In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

[EX Q]: Comment: Well shucks. I guess you'll just have to cut costs.
[EX A]: Non-sexual-explicit

[EX Q]: Comment: What's the 'legislature' going to do?  Appropriate money for, yet, another study to 'see if a giant net can be made to catch the nuke before she goes off'?.......The only real plan is to bend over as far as you can and kiss your arse goodbye!
[EX A]: Sexual-explicit

[EX Q]: Comment: The point in the electors was to have delegates from each state to send to the election conference and cast votes for their states. This was before the internet and voting machines. We can send results nearly immediately now, not by horse and carriage. 
The states make the rules for their electors, not the US government. They have no case. It's a waste of money to drum up support for a popular national vote. It is not just or fair for a few electors in a state to get to decide against the state's majority and vote for their candidate. In fact, it's inviting fraud and puppet buyouts. Just as it's not just or fair for a few states to continue importing immigrants and encouraging them not to integrate but to hate and blame one side so they'll vote for the other, winning all elections in the future - if changed to popular vote.

 So sick of this bs.
[EX A]:
Non-sexual-explicit