We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.
--------
Question: Sent1: People use the argument that we should not execute people based on the possibility that they may be innocent, but they could care less if we lock someone up for life who may be innocent.
 Sent2: If they don't want to kill an innocent person, stick to life in prison.

Answer: Not similar


Question: Sent1: Did you study when these people were exonerated and in what year were they placed on the death penalty?
 Sent2: The studies are very clear that people are routinely convicted of crimes that they never committed, period.

Answer: Not similar


Question: Sent1: An argument regarding the death penalty should be confined to discussions regarding those who have been wrongly convicted and sentenced to death.
 Sent2: The debate question asks "Should the death penalty be legalized?"

Answer:
Not similar