We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

[Q]: Sent1: Besides I'm not saying we should apply the death penalty in all instances of murder for example.
 Sent2: Depending on that state's laws, if you're going to apply the death penalty, I find the death penalty appropriately applied to this case.
[A]: Not similar


[Q]: Sent1: The problem with the death penalty is eventually someone will be sentenced to death when they are in fact guilty.
 Sent2: The notion that innocent people may be sentenced to death is not a death penalty problem, it is a judicial system problem.
[A]: Not similar


[Q]: Sent1: The crimes meriting the death penalty are by-and-large not commited by those considering the consequences, no matter what those consequences may be.
 Sent2: That should be a crime which should result in the death penalty.
[A]:
Not similar