The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.

Q: Context: 'I know how that goes...We are planning on hiking too and we could also use some extra food.' 'well I am sure between you and me we will find a way....' 'I really need some food, but I could also use extra firewood. It is supposed to be pretty cold at night and we would love to cook up some smores.'
Utterance: 'I hear you we have the same issues well you can have either 2 food or 2 firewood what would you prefer?'

A: Yes
****
Q: Context: 'I think we're on the right track.  I am bring my 2 kids with me and they eat everything in sight.' 'Would they be okay with 2 food?  Otherwise can give you an extra and I can take either an additional water or firewood 🙂' 'I have a great offer.  How about I take 2 food, 2 firewood and 1 water and you will get the extra water your camp needs!!'
Utterance: 'We place a premium on the water.  That's the same amount of water, do you mean we take 3?'

A: Yes
****
Q: Context: 'We can do that! How do you want to split up the firewood?' 'It's an odd number so someone has to get 2. But in order to make it fair if one of us takes two then the other should get one of the lower priority items. What do you think?' 'That sounds fair to me! I am good either way.'
Utterance: 'That's very nice of you. If it is ok with you them I'll take two firewood and 2 water and you can have the rest.'

A:
No
****