In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

Input: Consider Input: Comment: mace the dog if attacking, charge and fine the irresponsible owners.

Output: Non-identity-attack


Input: Consider Input: Comment: Just so you know... Another cop, a white woman this time, catapulted out of bed, found four or five steroid monsters to help and murdered another UNARMED black man for doing what he was told. Today. In Tulsa, that bastion of civil rights which has NEVER had problems unless you count 80 years of white people killing blacks.

Go ahead and hate rate me. It will simply show I'm right.

Output: Identity-attack


Input: Consider Input: Comment: The lede of the story is buried in the last paragraph. I am absolutely gobsmacked that some two-bit flack in the Mayor's office is able to fob off a reporter at SW by telling him to go read an article in The Stranger?
EFFING SERIOUSLY?!?
Show some damn pride you guys. When I lent my byline to this publication, that sort of stunt would not have stood for two seconds, even if I had to go down to City Hall, kick open a door and pound on someone's desk until I got my question answered.
I am just absolutely astounded this sort of behavior is tolerated. And it is telling that staff at City Hall give absolutely ZERO fochs about Seattle Weekly that they feel emboldened to send a reporter trundling along to read our competitor's rag.
Holy hell guys.


Output: Non-identity-attack