In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Ex Input:
Comment: How do you shut Drudge down and not shut down all the bigoted, racist, sites he links to like the Washington post, New york times, ext... ;)

Ex Output:
Non-sexual-explicit


Ex Input:
Comment: Peeing in the park/alley when you think no one is looking is not an offense that requires registration as a sex offender in the State of Colorado. It does not meet the elements of Indecent Exposure, which requires a KNOWING exposure of genitals to the view of another person when done with the intent to arouse. It also does not meet the elements of Public Indecency (which only requires registration after a second conviction within 5 years), which requires a KNOWING exposure of genitals to the view of another person.

Also, the juvenile sex offender registry is not made available to the public in the same way as the adult sex offender registry. And first-time juvenile sex offenders are able to petition for de-registration once they have successfully completed their sentence.

Ex Output:
Sexual-explicit


Ex Input:
Comment: Requesting a recount when there is a differential of less than 100 votes is one thing. The NDP is really reaching with their three recount requests. Next they will say there was some skull-duggery going on and its all BC elections fault.

Ex Output:

Non-sexual-explicit