In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

Example Input: Sentence: The large ball crashed right through the table because it was made of steel.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the large ball because it took the entire table in its path. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Example Output: Wrong

Example Input: Sentence: I was trying to open the lock with the key, but someone had filled the  keyhole with chewing gum, and I couldn't get it out.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the chewing gum because of the 'it' in the name. It's not a lock, it's a door. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Example Output: Wrong

Example Input: Sentence: In the storm, the tree fell down and crashed through the roof of my  house. Now, I have to get it removed.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the tree because the house is located in a storm alley. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Example Output:
Wrong