In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence can be inferred from the statement. Incorrect choices change the meaning in important ways or have details that are not mentioned in the statement. Indicate your answer as 1,2, or 3 corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.

[Q]: Statement: In order to facilitate the ability of the participants to work from an agreed upon set of facts about themselves, the facilitators divided the conferees into three groups. Choices:  1. The facilitators broke the people up into three groups. 2. The facilitators broke the people up into seven groups. 3. The facilitators broke the people up into three groups at the conference.
[A]: 1


[Q]: Statement: Rennie nodded. Choices:  1. Rennie was napping. 2. Rennie was in agreement. 3. Rennie was nodding.
[A]: 3


[Q]: Statement: As I've discussed in my testimony, the increasing complexity of issues and the accelerating change in government-major factors in GAO's strategic plan-helped us realize that this realignment was necessary to better position GAO for serving the future needs of the Congress. Choices:  1. No realignment is necessary to better position GAO for being able to meet the future needs of the Congress. 2. The accelerating change in government-major factors int he GAO's strategic plan was what helped us realized that the realignment was necessary.  3. I've had over a dozen discussions about my testimony.
[A]:
2