instruction:
The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.
question:
Context: 'Hello, how are you today?' 'hello, I am good, I am very excited about this trip. how are you?' 'i am great, super excited about camping as well, are there any supplies that you really need?'
Utterance: 'i really need water and food. we did not get enough of those.'
answer:
Yes


question:
Context: 'I am good as well. That is good to hear that you like to have bigger fires as we do not care much for that. We would much rather have some extra water.' 'Water is a little important to us too though , if possible maybe we can split that or maybe we can get some more food in replacement.' 'That may be possible.... 🙂 What did you have in mind for the food replacement? '
Utterance: 'You can have all the water if we can have all the food?'
answer:
No


question:
Context: 'I could really use some extra firewood!' 'So could I. How about we split the firewood?' 'How about I take 2 firewood but you can have 2 waters? Water is pretty important and I have a little extra.'
Utterance: 'That sounds fair.'
answer:

No