Categorize the comment on the basis of toxicity. If the comment is toxic (harmful, malicious, derogatory, threat, insult, identity attck, etc.) output Yes, otherwise output No.

[Q]: Thomas Frank, in his recent book "Listen Liberal", disputes the idea that Obama was so constrained by the Republicans that he couldn't do more. He didn't have to put Wall Street execs in charge of his economic program. He also didn't have to leave troops in Afghanistan and kill people in a number of countries with drones. Or make war on Libya, as urged by Clinton. I don't think Obama really wanted to do more. Like the Clintons, Obama is an elite limousine liberal, comfortable with the way things are. After all, it worked for him.
[A]: No


[Q]: It was a tongue in cheek remark, Frederick Minshall. Thus ending the sentence with .......

Someone had chided Shannyn's use of 'ammosexual' as being name calling, and they quit reading her article at that point, because of it.
[A]: No


[Q]: What is your thinking, then, on whether or not 75% of that partnership will ever submit capital to build it in the near term. A gas line is possible but not in the immediate future. Perhaps 20 years from now and we should have our fiscal house in order by then.
[A]:
No