We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Sent1: ...Virtually never are murderers the ordinary, law-abiding people against whom gun bans are aimed.
 Sent2: If guns are banned, the only people that will be affected will be the people that buy guns for protection from criminals, who get their guns illegally anyway.
Not similar

Sent1: buying guns, there is no requirement that federally licensed gun manufacturers and dealers
 Sent2: The manufacturer tells them who the gun was shipped to, the dealer is contacted, and the dealer informs the ATF or the police of who the gun was sold to and when.
Not similar

Sent1: I'm more concerned with the concept of why the individual that committed the murder was able to kill in the first place.
 Sent2: I was using it simply to illustrate society's right to be protected from someone commiting the same crime again before they can be prosecuted for the first offence.

Not similar