In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence can be inferred from the statement. Incorrect choices change the meaning in important ways or have details that are not mentioned in the statement. Indicate your answer as 1,2, or 3 corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.

Ex Input:
Statement: GAO's work on Y2K began through its research and development program, but the vital importance of this issue has manifested itself in many congressional requests for work that the agency received in fiscal years 1998 and 1999. Choices:  1. The extreme importance of the Y2K issue caused a number of requests for work from GOA. 2. GOA investigated the Y2K issue because it a widespread impact on financial institutions and businesses. 3. The Y2K issue was widely ignored and required little to no work to resolve.

Ex Output:
1


Ex Input:
Statement: This requires careful organization of the files of original observations, complete documentation of the conditions of data collection that are relevant to the trustworthiness and credibility of the information, and making transparent and reproducible the manner in which the evaluator moved from phase to phase of the analysis. Choices:  1. Several cases of fraud have been discovered where the evaluator's procedure was not well-documented. 2. It is not necessary to document the evaluator's process. 3. Thorough documentation is necessary so that the evaluator's process can be reproduced.

Ex Output:
3


Ex Input:
Statement: I am generally a fan of Michael Kinsley's, but I must take issue with his recent article, Social  From Ponzi Scheme to Shell Game. Choices:  1. Michael Kinsley's latest article raises some issues within me. 2. I loved everything about Michael Kinsley's newest article. 3. Despite causing some issues my opinion of MIchael Kinsley hasn't changed.

Ex Output:

1