Given a document, an entity and its sentiment towards the entity, verify if it is the correct sentiment towards the entity. Answer should be yes or no. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].
--------
Question: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Arielle Kebbel is Positive . Actress Arielle Kebbel’s sister has been missing for days  and  she ’s asking people on social media to help in the search.
Kebbel  who’s starred in TV series like “Unreal ” “Ballers” and “Vampire Diaries ” is trying to locate Julia Kebbel  who apparently was last seen on the night of Jan. 31 in the Silver Lake neighborhood of Los Angeles walking  her  chocolate Labrador.
A post shared by Arielle Kebbel (@ariellekebbel) on Feb 3  2018 at 9:08am PST
Arielle Kebbel later posted a missing persons flyer with her sister’s description.
A post shared by Arielle Kebbel (@ariellekebbel) on Feb 4  2018 at 4:29pm PST
“Arielle Kebbel  a cast mate from Life Unexpected and UnReal  is in need of our help. Her sister is missing. Please read below  take a look at the photos and if you see or hear anything  please reach out ” Appleby wrote on Instagram.

Answer: yes


Question: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Luke Walton is Negative . LOS ANGELES --  Luke Walton  and Lonzo Ball both say that the Los Angeles Lakers' head coach has not lost the locker room  as LaVar Ball asserted.
Lonzo Ball also said  "I'll play for anybody " when asked whether he is fine with  Walton  as his coach.?
 Walton  ?whose team ended a nine-game losing streak with a 132-113 win over the Atlanta Hawks on Sunday night  disagreed with LaVar's latest criticism of him.  Walton   who said Friday morning that he is not coaching as if his job is on the line  was asked whether he has received assurances from anyone in Lakers upper management.
"Yeah. We're  I feel  very secure in my job status right now "  Walton  said. "We talk all the time. They're 100 percent behind and supporting what we're doing."
Lakers majority owner Jeanie Buss tweeted strong support with the hashtag "InLukeWeTrust" on New Year's Eve  and all indications have been that  Walton 's job security is not an issue.?A Lakers source told ESPN's Ramona Shelburne that Walton's job status is "not even a conversation."
This is not the first time LaVar Ball has been critical of  Walton 's coaching. He has said that the Lakers' coaching staff is "soft" and doesn't know how to coach his son  and he expressed his displeasure with how  Walton  was using his son in the fourth quarter of games.
The Lakers already have held a meeting with the elder Ball and asked him to tone down his criticisms of  Walton  to foster a better atmosphere for Lonzo Ball and continue a positive relationship with the organization.
LaVar Ball's latest comments left the No. 2 overall pick having to answer several questions Sunday morning about the state of the Lakers' locker room and his relationship with  Walton .
"He is going to speak his mind. He is not going to change " said Lonzo Ball  who says he hasn't spoken to LaVar since his father and two brothers landed in Lithuania  where LiAngelo and LaMelo Ball are playing for the pro team Prienu Vytautas. "... I don't think [ Walton  has lost the locker room]. I mean   he 's our head coach. We are going to play for  him .
"That is just  his  opinion.  He  has coached me  his  whole life. So  he  is definitely going to have a strong opinion about it. That's just what it is."?
"I don't see that the players aren't playing hard "  Walton  said. "I think the players are playing very hard. We've been through a hard stretch  but they are giving us what they have  and we're going to keep working  and we'll be fine."
"I'm fine with it. It doesn't bother me "  Walton  said of LaVar Ball's repeated criticism of  him . "My only concern with any of it is for Zo. As long as Zo's fine with it and Zo can come out and play  and it doesn't affect mine and his relationship  then it doesn't bother me at all."
Lonzo Ball said that he focuses on playing basketball and that he has told  Walton  before that his father's comments don't affect him.
 Walton  was asked whether LaVar Ball's comments could possibly influence what management is thinking about its coach and the team's rebuild.
"I would hope not  but it doesn't influence what we're doing "  Walton  said of the coaching staff. "I've said all along there's always parents  and parents are going to get mad at things -- that's what they do. And it's our job as coaches and coaches in the organization to do what's best for our team and our players  and we make those decisions based on what we see every single day in the facility and on the court."

Answer: no


Question: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Tom Aveni is Neutral . Ideas for research projects can germinate from the least likely moments  as when a student asked  Firearms Trainer Tom Aveni  if he'd ever visited the ACLU's website. He hadn't ("Why would I even want to go there?")  but out of curiosity he did.
Not only did the ACLU statistic turn out to be not as far off as he imagined but  Aveni  has made other unexpected discoveries - pertaining especially to hit ratios  low-light shootings  multiple-officer confrontations  mistaken judgment calls and less-lethal technology - that have convinced him police firearms training needs a significant overhaul.
Dr. Bill Lewinski  executive director of the Force Science Research Center at Minnesota State University-Mankato  says that by pursuing "important and different kinds of questions "  Aveni  has produced "valuable new insights into officer-involved shootings." His findings are expected to provide "a cutting-edge demographic foundation" for upcoming research projects at FSRC that hopefully will result in "profound changes in law enforcement training in the future."
An ex-cop with 23 years' training experience   Aveni  now heads the Police Policy Studies Council  a research  training and consulting corporation based in Spofford  NH  and is a member of FSRC's National Advisory Board  as well as a busy expert witness in police litigation. Like other trainers   he  says   he  "made a lot of assumptions that are not true" until  his  research provided "an epiphany for  me " about some of the nuances of police shootings.
 He  was struck first by how tough it is to find out anything meaningful on the subject from law enforcement agencies. Most don't compile detailed data on their shootings  fearing in some cases (perhaps rightly) that it would be misinterpreted and misused by the media and "agenda activists" if available. Of the few departments that do collect deadly force information  "even fewer freely share it " Aveni claims. If they don't outright suppress it  they tend to present it in bare-bones  "sterilized table formats" that have no standardized consistency and that "make detailed analysis difficult."  Aveni  observes: "The devil is in the details  and the details of police shootings have always been lost."
 Aveni  spent more than 6 months dissecting that material according to different variables. That information  combined with limited statistics  he  managed to obtain related to shootings on other major departments  including New York City  Baltimore County (MD)  Miami  Portland (OR) and Washington (DC)  has allowed  him  to spotlight a number of deadly force subtleties that have not been so thoroughly examined before.
For example  it has long been believed that officers overall have a dismal 15-25 percent hit probability in street encounters  suggesting truly poor performance under the stress of a real shooting situation. Actually  this figure  while essentially true in the aggregate  is markedly skewed by certain shooting variables   Aveni  found.
During a 13-year span  the Baltimore County PD  which  Aveni  regards as one of the best trained in the country  achieved an average hit ratio of 64 percent in daylight shootings - not ideal  but clearly much better than commonly believed. In shootings that occurred in low-light surroundings  however  average hits dropped to 45 percent  a 30 percent decline. The data from Los Angeles County (LAC) reveals a somewhat comparable 24 percent decline.
"Until this research "  Aveni  says  "performance has never been accurately matched to lighting conditions " even though as many as 77 percent of police shootings are believed to occur under some degree of diminished lighting. Some departments tally "outdoor" versus "indoor" shootings  but most appear not to precisely differentiate between low-light and ample-light events  despite the preponderance of shootings during nighttime duty tours.
A multiple-officer shooting  in which more than one officer fires during a deadly force engagement  has an even greater influence on hit probability   Aveni  discovered.
Multiple-officer shootings   Aveni  told Force Science News  are three times more likely to involve suspects with shoulder weapons than single-officer shootings. This tends to "increase the typical stand-off distance " he says. Many of these confrontations also embody fast-changing  chaotic and complex circumstances. These factors  Aveni believes  help explain the negative impact on accuracy.
 Aveni  also discovered a correlation between multiple-officer shootings and number of rounds fired.
With LAC shootings involving only one officer  an average of 3.59 police rounds were fired. When 2 officers got involved  the average jumped to 4.98 rounds and with 3 officers or more to 6.48. "The number of rounds fired per officer increases in multiple-officer shootings by as much as 45 percent over single-officer shootings  " Aveni  says.
The ACLU's statistic that got him started on this project turned out to be based on fatal shootings that occurred before the landmark Supreme Court decision Tennessee v. Garner  when nearly half the states still legally permitted the shooting of any fleeing felon  regardless of the threat he or she presented. After the restrictions imposed by Garner  "you'd expect fewer unarmed suspects to be shot "  Aveni  explains.
Not necessarily true  though   Aveni  found. In a recent 12-year period  Metro-Dade (Miami) PD reported 34 shootings in which suspects were "clearly unarmed" or in which officers thought they saw a gun but none was found. All told  about a third of all shootings in which suspects were shot and killed by that agency's officers were considered "questionable." In a recent Texas study  25 percent of suspects shot by officers in one metropolitan county were found to be unarmed  33 percent if shots fired at moving vehicles are included. LAC's data put the unarmed target figure at 18 percent  well below the ACLU's pre-Garner assertion.
Higher or lower  many of these shootings are "mistake-of-fact" (MOF) situations   Aveni  says. Usually a suspect is displaying an item that is falsely but reasonably perceived to be a deadly weapon (a cell phone  for example)  or the suspect is behaving in such a way that in context is believed to constitute an immediate lethal threat (making a fast  furtive movement toward the waistband  for instance).

Answer:
no