instruction:
We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.
question:
Sent1: It also give the right to equipment with which you could execute murders, armed robberies and other violent crime.
 Sent2: You can debate that without guns there would be more deaths to other weapons although you can't debate it would be to the same extent as gun murders and crimes would be.
answer:
Not similar


question:
Sent1: If anything, it has ruled in favor of gun control, saying in the Miller case that "The Second Amendment must be interpreted and applied with a view to its purpose of rendering effective the Militia."
 Sent2: In other words the Miller case interpreted the Second Amendment to mean one has the right to own militia type weapons.
answer:
Similar


question:
Sent1: In short, Norway has more guns, yet less people killing each other.
 Sent2: it isn't guns that kill people, is the mentality these people carry around in their heads that kill other people.
answer:

Not similar