Categorize the comment on the basis of severe toxicity. If the comment is severely toxic output Yes, otherwise output No.

Input: Consider Input: That's a rather elitist & intolerant statement.
 What have you got against people who shop at Walmart? 
What makes you think you're any better than them?

Output: Yes


Input: Consider Input: Where is the ban on white mascots? According to liberal dementia there are no other mascots of race to ban. There's the David Douglas Scotts, a white guy wearing a kilt blowing bagpipes, there's the fighting Irish...but according to liberal dementia these mascots are not of race, therefore are not racist stereotyping. Every national poll taken with just us red skin Injuns (I'm Chickasaw) shows 85% of us Injuns overwhelmingly support Indian mascots, 10% could care less either way, and a pathetic 5% are emotional cripples who are offended. When asked why they are offended they take stupidity to an art level. The State School board, and a limited # of Native Americans', are teaching our children a racist stereotyping of Indians, by singling them out. While our public schools are an international embarrassment, liberals are addressing mascots after creating a racist argument against Indian mascots while protecting whitey mascots.

Output: Yes


Input: Consider Input: Agreed; this is really disappointing. You'd think they'd be legally bound to follow through on a voter-passed bond measure. How will it be decided what that money will be used for now (unless, like you suggest, it's already been spent)?


Output: No