In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

Ex Input:
Comment: Such an absurd comment.  Actually, this will directly benefit affordable projects, because they will pass the savings onto residents, just as occurs with lower utility bills due to conservation.  As for discouragement of larger projects: silly.  The cost increment is so modest per square foot, and the cost benefit so clear, that it will not impede the decision to appropriately scale.

Suggesting this is racist is silliest of all.  Environmental benefit benefits all.  Environmental Equity's a thing, focusing on the obligation of all to provide healthy conditions for all, particularly those most disenfranchised.

But mostly: look at the economics.  This is an unambiguous step forward.

Ex Output:
Non-identity-attack


Ex Input:
Comment: " Much of the violence in Charlottesville was black on white (or representatives thereof). No sentence enhancement there."

<citation needed>

So far, I've only seen white dudes kill at the charlotte rally, or get charged with crimes. There was the crying nazi, pretty sure he wasn't black.

Ex Output:
Identity-attack


Ex Input:
Comment: The election was won by lost, coddled neurotic white boys and the abused, co-dependent women who enable them.

Ex Output:

Identity-attack