In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Q: Comment: What? Jeff Sessions isn't good. He's pretty much evil.

A: Non-obscene
****
Q: Comment: In the trade fight Christy Clark is the loud talking 90 pound weakling who is going to get the  crap kicked out of her by the  big bad American bully. 
Is this the way we want it? No, but this is the reality of the trade dispute. Nice try Clark but every one is aware that your bluster only amounts to a bucket of warm spit as far as the Americans are concerned.

A: Obscene
****
Q: Comment: The fact that you have to lead with an insult tells me you have nothing valid to say. Living in the US without citizenship or documentation is not itself a crime. It is a crime if you have been deported and return without documentation but it isn't a crime of violence or a property crime in itself. Just because it pleases you to utter lies doesn't make those lies true. It is true that taking into consideration age cohort and sex, immigrants are far less likely than citizens to commit the crimes that send you to prison.

Your single cost balance is ludicrous. All federal agencies and most economists say that undocumented workers are a big part of our economy (about 10%), contribute billions in taxes at all levels, contribute billions to SS, Medicare and Medicaid (which most will never benefit from, saving citizens a lot of money), and spending most of their money in their local economy for food and housing.

Your entire post is lies. I can back up what I wrote, you can't back up lies.

A:
Non-obscene
****