In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence can be inferred from the statement. Incorrect choices change the meaning in important ways or have details that are not mentioned in the statement. Indicate your answer as 1,2, or 3 corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.

Ex Input:
Statement: As for the statement relating to the destruction of the will, the prisoner had formerly practiced at the Bar, and was perfectly well aware that the will made in his favour a year before was automatically revoked by his stepmother's remarriage.  Choices:  1. The prisoner tried to have the will remade to be more favour some to himself. 2. The prisoner knew that the will made in his favour the prior year was revoked when his stepmother remarried. 3. The prisoner was once a lawyer before he was captured.

Ex Output:
2


Ex Input:
Statement: Anyone who knew Tony Lukas even slightly was deeply impressed by his boundless, open-minded curiosity about the injustices of modern life, along with his stubborn reportorial integrity about getting to the very bottom of any story as best he could. Choices:  1. Tony Lukas was an elitist.  2. People who knew Tony Lukas were impressed by his curiosity and integrity in the news field.  3. Tony Lukas was open minded, curious and stubborn. 

Ex Output:
2


Ex Input:
Statement: This site provides guidance, information and tools to government and nonprofit managers as they attempt to design and implement measurementbased management in state, local, and federal government environments. Choices:  1. The website provides important information to the government. 2. Nobody needs this website, the government has all the necessary information; 3. The government and nonprofit managers can find information on this website.

Ex Output:

3