instruction:
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
question:
Trump is going to change all that and give vets and their families everything they deserve . These hero's have been short changed far too long .
answer:
No


question:
If they were acquiring the A320s they could turn around and sell them, if they don't want to operate a mixed fleet. At least they'd get some of their $2.6 billion back. So it certainly makes sense to factor in the planes.

If they go to an all Boeing fleet, all the Virgin employees are going to have to be trained on the 737, from pilot training to ground logistics.  It's going to be expensive, no matter which way they go.
answer:
No


question:
"Duplicitous criminal?"
Sorry, friend, but one doesn't get to make up charges. I'm unaware of any charges, much less convictions, of our former Secretary of State.
I am also unaware of any grandiose promises she has made that are unreachable, assuming we don't have a continuance of our "No!" congressional Republican leadership.
As for that 1% thing: I applaud a person that is willing to sacrifice for the general good. You aren't envious of her wealth, are you?
Far more disturbing is a billionaire like Trump saying this country sucks and who wants to give himself and his cronies unprecedented MAJOR tax cuts.
Hillary may be a somewhat jelly-like centrist, but she's no hate-filled greed ball like Trump.
answer:

Yes