We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

[EX Q]: Sent1: Besides I'm not saying we should apply the death penalty in all instances of murder for example.
 Sent2: Depending on that state's laws, if you're going to apply the death penalty, I find the death penalty appropriately applied to this case.
[EX A]: Not similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: Last time I checked, killing doesn't bring persons back to life, so the only reason for the death penalty seems to be revenge.
 Sent2: With all that it has been a very trying time for me and I have had to struggle with how I really felt about the death penalty.
[EX A]: Not similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: Not to mention that the death penalty is more costly than simple life in prison in both money and time.
 Sent2: Hellno is right, capital punishment should be much more cost effective than the alternative- life in prison without parole.
[EX A]:
Not similar