In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.

[Q]: Comment: Actually, there seems evidence that rather than moving leftward, Universities have been moving more to the right than ever via  allowing more and more corporate influence via the lure of cash donations, and corporate sponsored and funded University "research centers" named after the donating corporations (e.g. Enbridge's at the U. of Calgary is just one example at one U. It's not unique). See a November, 15, 2016 Globe article entitled  "Canadian universities search for balance in accepting corporate money" for more. So much for Canadian U's being leftist bastions fomenting and fermenting socialist revolution. The corporate capitalists are taking over Universities, not the Marxists.
[A]: Disagree


[Q]: Comment: Why do you claim that China is our enemy? Do you have some proof of that, or is it just another paranoid rant? 
Personally I think China should have access to the best military technology since a balance of power is always the best deterrent to wars.
[A]: Disagree


[Q]: Comment: Interesting, Winnipeg Warrior. Your impression is that media treats Muslim violence as individual acts and white violence as a societal problem. My impression is the reverse, that the media are more likely to treat Muslim violence as a product of Islam, and white violence as the result of mental imbalance. And many expect Muslim clerics to apologize for Muslim violence, but we don't expect the same of Christian clerics. We seem to believe what we want to believe. How do we resolve this?
[A]:
Disagree