instruction:
In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: threat and non-threat. Threat is a statement that someone will be hurt or harmed, especially if the person does not do something in particular.
question:
Comment: I find those who chant do so because they either have such a slim argument that they don't want to be drawn into it, or because they lack the mental prowess to mount their argument in a rational manner.  It is for that reason that the "Lock her up," chant is offensive.  

I should point out too that the main perpetrators of the chanting phenomenon are unionists, "Hey, Hey  Ho, Ho.  Fill-in-the-blank has got to go!"   Clever eh?   The "progressives" particularly the enviro-nuts, are no better,  “U.G.L.Y.  Corporate scum you cheat you lie.  You UGLY, uh, uh, you UGLY.”   That intellectual gem and many others are found on the website tarsandsblockade.org

Chanting has no place in rational debate, none.
answer:
Non-threat


question:
Comment: Let's not even begin to talk about " the family wealth " comment or  the reporter who broke the lumber loop hole used to minimize the tax burden on Trudeau family  cottage. 
Yes 1st Kathleen and her $15 dollar minimum wage and now a desperate Liberal party attacking the back bone of this county. 
I have said it a million times, the government won the last election and the tax payers lost. 
I have zero regard for the establishment and those who are there useful idiots. 
SHAME!!!!
answer:
Non-threat


question:
Comment: Please provide links to support your that I'm lying about this issue. I'll wait, Troll
answer:

Non-threat