In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

[EX Q]: Sentence: I was trying to open the lock with the key, but someone had filled the  keyhole with chewing gum, and I couldn't get it in.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the key because tyrping to open the key. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
[EX A]: Wrong

[EX Q]: Sentence: I stuck a pin through a carrot. When I pulled the pin out, it had a hole.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the carrot because The carrot was being stuck by the pin; therefore it would have the hole. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
[EX A]: Correct

[EX Q]: Sentence: Adam can't leave work here until Bob arrives to replace him. If Bob had  left home for work on time, he would be here by this time.
 Reason: The 'he' refers to bob because bob should come to replace adam work. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
[EX A]:
Correct