Given a document, an entity and its sentiment towards the entity, verify if it is the correct sentiment towards the entity. Answer should be yes or no. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

[Q]: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Kevin Cramer is Neutral . North Dakota Rep. Kevin Cramer  has reversed course and will challenge Democratic Sen. Heidi Heitkamp  finally giving Republicans a top recruit in a state that President Trump won by more than 30 points and making it a prime pickup opportunity for the GOP in 2018.
On Facebook   Cramer  posted  he  will be announcing  his  Senate candidacy on Friday in Bismarck.
 Cramer  had initially said last month  he  wouldn't be challenging Heitkamp  leaving Republicans without a top-tier candidate against what should be one of Democrats' most vulnerable incumbents this year  serving in a consistently red state. The White House even reached out to  Cramer  to woo  him  to jump into the contest  but initially  he  elected instead to remain in  his  safe House seat.
But in recent days  he  began to waver on that initial decision. "There's certainly a growing snowball of encouragement coming out of the state  " Cramer  told reporters at the Capitol on Tuesday  according to CNN.
Former state party chairman Gary Emineth announced earlier this week he was dropping out of the Senate primary  in anticipation that  Cramer  was going to run. The Atlantic also reported that if  Cramer  did run for Senate  state Sen. Tom Campbell  the other major candidate in the race  was likely to run for  Cramer 's open House seat instead  clearing the primary field for the congressman.
 His  change of heart is a bright spot for Senate Republicans who have struggled to find top recruits in other states as well  despite being blessed with a very favorable 2018 map where 10 Democrats are up for re-election in states that Trump won. Republicans hold just a narrow 51-49 Senate majority  and they have two vulnerable seats they're defending in Nevada and Arizona.
[A]: no


[Q]: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity LeBron James is Negative . ''' James said at poine point . 
James had waded back into the fray over the weekend . 
INDEPENDENCE , Ohio -- LeBron James helped move the conversation forward Monday after the latest collision of sports and politics over the weekend . 
Where Gilbert was right , and where James could meet him in using his voice instead of his knee and encouraging the same from his peers , is in taking steps toward those highly sought constructive conversations and positive resolutions . 
"He does n't understand the power that he has , for being the leader of this beautiful country ," James said . 
Minutes later , though , James felt obliged to explain that kneeling during the national anthem is "not about disrespect of the flag and our military and everybody who has made this world free . 
James , the Cleveland Cavaliers ' star as well as the NBA 's top performer and perhaps its most polarizing figure , was in a good mood , engaged and willing to entertain questions about anything , from anyone , in the most notable exchange at the Cavs ' media day . 
James was savvy enough at the start of what became a 40-minute Q&A session to request that reporters clump their questions together by topic -- and there were a good half dozen meaty ones hanging over him and his team after a tumultuous offseason -- rather than skip randomly back and forth . 
James said he would lend his voice , his passion , his money and his resources to causes , particularly involving young people . 
His foundation launched a school in his hometown of Akron for at-risk students , helping 1,300 students at a cost of nearly $ 45 million , James said Monday . 
The Trump topic in particular ate up nearly half of his time on the platform , during which James shined a light and sharpened focus on an unwieldy issue that largely has been defined by and debated according to kneeling vs. standing , asserting one 's right to protest vs. respecting America and its flag , and most recently pushing back against or knuckling under to President Trump . 
Where James veered into dicey territory was when he said : "No matter whether you voted for him or not , you may have made a mistake and that 's OK , if you voted for him . 
James was asked if he expected the NFL 's controversy over players ' sideline protests to draw attention to what they feel is racial discrimination in law enforcement , up to and including brutality involving lethal force , to trickle down to the NBA when the league 's 2017-18 regular season begins Oct. 17 . 
It was n't as simple as second-guessing the 1984 Trail Blazers for drafting Sam Bowie over Michael Jordan , which James mentioned . 
"I did n't name-call ," James said . 
The state in which James was born , lives and works -- and the state in which the Cavaliers do business -- was carried by Trump in the 2016 election . 
The current president took Ohio with 51 percent of the vote , compared to 43 who voted for Hillary Clinton , who had the benefit of James ' public endorsement . 
Right there , James nudged the whole issue a bit . 
James at one point eloquently made a case for keeping politics out of sports . 
Asked how he would reconcile the idea of his neighbors , presumably many Cavaliers fans , voting that way , James doubled down .
[A]: yes


[Q]: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Travis Kalanick is Positive . Travis Kalanick has to get Uber's bet on self-driving cars right.
"It starts with understanding that the world is going to go self-driving and autonomous "  he  told Business Insider in an interview.
"So if that's happening  what would happen if we weren't a part of that future? If we weren't part of the autonomy thing? Then the future passes us by basically  in a very expeditious and efficient way "  he  said.
These are big  bold  and aggressive moves characteristic of the Uber that has already changed how millions get around in cities across the globe. But they also show the growing existential threat that  Kalanick  feels if  his  company doesn't wake up to the impending revolution in transportation.
And  he 's not willing to cede any ground to giants with hundreds of billions of dollars in the bank  like Apple or Google.
"If we are not tied for first  then the person who is in first  or the entity that's in first  then rolls out a ride-sharing network that is far cheaper or far higher-quality than Uber's  then Uber is no longer a thing "  Kalanick  said.
Business Insider spoke to  Kalanick  about what an Uber that relies on self-driving cars looks like â and what will happen to all of those drivers who tote people around if this is its future.
 Kalanick : I think it starts with understanding that the world is going to go self-driving and autonomous. Because  well  a million fewer people are going to die a year. Traffic in all cities will be gone. Significantly reduced pollution and trillions of hours will be given back to people â quality of life goes way up. Once you go  "All right  there's a lot of upsides there" and you have folks like the folks in Mountain View  [California ] a few different companies working hard on this problem  this thing is going to happen.
 Kalanick : That is the trillion-dollar question  and I wish I had an answer for you on that one  but I don't. What I know is that I can't be wrong. Right? I have to make sure that I'm ready when it's ready or that I'm making it ready. So  I have to be tied for first at the least.
 Kalanick : No  I don't. I think we're catching up. Look at some of the folks and how long they've been working on it. Lots of respect for an area that they've pioneered  and we've got to do some catch-up. And that's OK  but it means we gotta wake up early and we're going to bed late.
 Kalanick : Isn't that the thing? [Laughs] I could give you self-driving nirvana if it's in the desert  there's no oncoming traffic and there are no pedestrians. I can do it right now. The problem is I don't think I could take you anywhere that you wanted to go. [Laughs] So  that's just the state of technology.
 Kalanick : Well  it's not about whether I think it is â it's that it has to be. So  if we are not tied for first  then the person who is in first  or the entity that's in first  then rolls out a ride-sharing network that is far cheaper or far higher-quality than Uber's  then Uber is no longer a thing.
 Kalanick : I wish I had the exact timeline. If you had the exact timeline  then it would mean everything was deterministic  that you knew exactly what needed to be built  and you could sort of logically figure it out. That is not the case. We just don't know all the things. There are still things to be invented. But this is a years thing  not a decade thing. But how many? Shoot  I don't know  but I'm going to be hustling to get it out there.
 Kalanick : The first part is that the timescale is pretty long. We've got income opportunities today and we got ways of serving the city today. That's part 1.
 Kalanick : It'll be city by city  but I promise you we will go to all of them.
[A]:
yes