Given a paragraph about movies and a set of conversational questions and answers about the paragraph, say whether the passage contains sufficient information to answer the follow-up question. Say Yes if it is answerable; otherwise, say No. The paragraph has the prefix 'CONTEXT:'. Each conversation question has a prefix `Q:` followed by the answer prefix `A:`, and the follow-up question has a prefix `FOLLOWUP_Q:`.

Example Input: CONTEXT: If Jon is to be put on the throne the only option for Daenerys is to kill her, because she's too dangerous with her dragons and people who would continue to support her, which could well include Jon. So the insinuation and what Tyrion is pleading against is that Varys would try to assassinate her.  <sep>  Q: Why does Varys conspire against Daenery? A: If Jon is to be put on the throne the only option for Daenerys is to kill her, because she's too dangerous with her dragons and people who would continue to support her  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Why do millions stand to die?
Example Output: No

Example Input: CONTEXT: There were many contradictions in Prot's character -- on one hand, he had an astonishing knowledge of astronomy (some of the things he'd discovered were absolutely new to some famous astronomers); on the other hand, he was hospitalized in a mental institute due to the fact that he had many mental issues. The staff obviously concluded that they were dealing with a mentally insane genius. He was maybe quite a unique and non-standard patient, but regardless - he was a patient in a mental hospital. Some people took this pretty seriously, and investigated his story, but you must remember that the entire situation ended pretty quickly -- throughout the entire film, they had very little time. Prot had a "deadline" -- if it was a countdown to a return to his home-planet or to a complete mental breakdown, either way it was a real deadline.  <sep>  Q: What can you tell me about the K-Pax Alien?
Example Output: Yes

Example Input: CONTEXT: He made that rock formation himself to catch fish. The arrangement of rocks into that shape is a traditional fishing technique called a fishing weir. Quite a few Native American tribes used this kind of fishing technique to catch freshwater fish. The rock formation forces the fish swimming downstream into a small area where they can't easily escape, and can be grabbed by the person fishing. From what I've read, it's actually not likely that a real fisherman would have used a weir in such a shallow stream; in those cases you could typically just grab the fish by hand as they swam in front of you. Nonetheless, it is a valid fishing technique in other cases.  <sep>  Q: Did someone arrange rocks in a U shape?
Example Output:
Yes