TASK DEFINITION: Craft one incorrect answer. In doing so, try to use words from the context as much as possible, or by using similar words used in the correct answer. DO NOT craft nonsensical or off-topic incorrect answers, such that the incorrect answers can be directly excluded without reasoning according to the context. Try to make your responses similar to the given correct answer. To this end, try to keep both the length and the style as similar as possible between the correct and the incorrect answer. To make your incorrect answers more difficult, try to incorporate words from context. To avoid being predictable or repetitive, try to add more variations and complexity.
PROBLEM: Context: I have cleaned windows , scrubbed floors and bathrooms and kitchens and all manner of other unsightly things and hoovered lots of small crunchy things that were beginning to stick to the bottom of my socks . I have been a true martyr to the cause . Despite this it appears I have been failing dismally on all counts . Every single meal I have cooked has apparently been inedible shite . 
Question: Why has the narrator put up with such degrading conditions ? 
Correct Answer: The narrator was willing to sacrifice comfort for the cause .

SOLUTION: The narrator did not buy into much of the cause .

PROBLEM: Context: I then came across a random building in a park I decided to explore , not knowing what it was I went in and asked . It was a concert hall and a very famous pianist was going to play . I decided to pay to go in . it was huge inside and very beautiful . 
Question: What may happen after I found a random building to explore ? 
Correct Answer: I entered the building to find out what kind it was .

SOLUTION: I found out it was a very famous pianist 's home .

PROBLEM: Context: Also , no souvenirs of the crime , such as newspaper clippings , were found in his possession as commonly seen in serial murder cases . What 's more , the FBI could not place Ivins at the crime scene with evidence , such as gas station or other receipts , at the time the letters were mailed in September and October 2001 . While acknowledging the circumstantial nature of their case against Ivins , prosecutors argue they 're confident they would have been able to prove his guilt " beyond a reasonable doubt " in court . 
Question: What 's a possible reason there were no souveneirs of the crime found in his possession ? 
Correct Answer: None of the above choices .

SOLUTION:
Because letters were mailed in September and October 2001 .