In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.
--------
Question: Comment: "It doesn't keep elections 'pure' it just drives the money into STUPID AREAS"

Well, that's a useful bunch of gibberish. It's not like there aren't elections all around the world with campaign finance laws that work quite well.

"You want to get good candidates get rid of every restriction BUT the REPORTING requirements."

Here's a better idea: leave every candidate with limited but equal financing -- so that candidates focus solely on explaining why their policy is superior to all others -- and every citizen, whether billionaire or hobo has but one equal voice.

It's "one man one vote" not "one dollar one vote."

Answer: Non-identity-attack


Question: Comment: "white fragility can kiss my ass. Your white tears aren't sacred, this land is." Masuma Khan. Ok Ms. Khan I get it. You're a racist exploiter struggling to make a place for yourself in the fascist pantheon.  It's tough being an original in that crowd, but at least you're blending in nicely.

Answer: Identity-attack


Question: Comment: Wait...Niger was the result of an inflammatory video produced by a racist American preacher??

Answer:
Identity-attack