In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Example Input: Comment: And, finally:
.
"We'd be in uncharted territory, that is unarguable."
.
What nonsense.
.
The vast majority of democracies world-wide use PR.  Are you really suggesting Canadians are too dumb to figure it out?
.
Or are you merely suggesting that it only works in countries where the populations once worshipped Odin, Thor, and Freya?
.
Bring on Bugs Bunny, Elmer Fudd, and the Wagnerian opera ...
Example Output: Non-obscene

Example Input: Comment: Your friend Jack has some serious problems.  He claims to be a Christian, he is married and I assume he will say he loves his wife.  How could Jack support a philandering liar like tRump?  And I wonder what it is about America that Jack loves?  He seems to be supporting the destruction of everything worthwhile, from public discourse, our government, our freedoms and our respect.
Example Output: Non-obscene

Example Input: Comment: In his pre-cardinal days, Burke was an arrogant, imperious and tyrannical despot. Oh, he's sweet, smarmy and so pious, bedecked in splendor at his Tridentine recreations, but he loves power. He's running for pope as we speak. Simply put, he wants the pope dead...or at least destroyed.
Example Output:
Non-obscene