We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Example Input: Sent1: So how about we stop a penalty that has executed innocents?
 Sent2: If we execute death penalty, we will not be better than murderers.
Example Output: Not similar

Example Input: Sent1: One way that would make me happy with the death penalty is if the person was killed in the same way as the person that they murdered.
 Sent2: I do not think that a government should be unable to kill someone, simply that they almost always should not.
Example Output: Not similar

Example Input: Sent1: by committing to the idea that someone deserves to die, you are committing to the revenge side of human nature, not the idea of punishment for crimes committed.
 Sent2: If a person is deterred from commiting a crime it is because fear in that person's mind has prevented him from commiting the crime.
Example Output:
Not similar