In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.

Example Input: Comment: Furlong did lie. Let's not forget that. At first he denied being in BC during an earlier stint in Burns Lake, then he admitted it, downplaying the commission of almost 2 years of his life and his original start in Canada. While that doesn't mean he hid something, it does bring up the matter of deception and convenient forgetfulness.

That si why he has zero claim for libel or wrongful dismissal.

So let him get on with his life, but not as a trusted public speaker or figure. His showboating style (Evermet him? Lots of self-promotion in his personality) is something he paid a price for.
Example Output: Disagree

Example Input: Comment: There is of course legitimate concern for US border authorities regarding official travel documentation. Given the diversity of members in the Girl Guides its hardly unexpected that not all of the participants are going to have that documentation in order. Certainly the Girl Guides had members unable to go due to travel restrictions in years before Trump was elected and it seems like political grandstanding to make this decision now.
Example Output: Disagree

Example Input: Comment: would you rather be out of pocket 20 million?

because that what is what he sued the GOC for and was in a position to win

think man think
Example Output:
Disagree