In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

[EX Q]: Comment: miloscia, you're in the wrong. you didnt have your words twisted. you pandered to your base and got called out for spewing nonsense. advice: if you need this sort of space to not sound crazy, stay off social media.

but youre right about 1 thing: "mr. federal way" is the opposite of journalism. he stains the mirrors credibility. whoever is behind him has no integrity, no ethics, and no spine. if its someone on the mirror payroll then i hope theyre blacklisted from other news jobs.
[EX A]: Non-identity-attack

[EX Q]: Comment: Ummm . . . . we just wrapped up 8 years of Barrack Obama with his incredibly sensitive but confused, milquetoast approach to international terrorism - which only gave rise to ISIS and is fast-tracking Iran to a nuclear bomb.

I'm sorry, but it's amazing how it's always a Muslim columnist in a western newspaper or a Muslim personality on a cable news network show who are so critical of the west but so insightful with all of the answers on how the west can jump through the hoops and finally gain peace from Islam.

Hey, how about it if Islam takes the big step and turns off the flow of terror and violence upon its own people as well as the west? Muslims terrorize and kill far more Muslims than they do of westerners. Try sorting his one out for yourselves first and we'll all benefit.
[EX A]: Identity-attack

[EX Q]: Comment: Puerile and pathetic.
[EX A]:
Non-identity-attack