In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: threat and non-threat. Threat is a statement that someone will be hurt or harmed, especially if the person does not do something in particular.

Comment: The Canadians who responded to this poll obviously have limited horizons and are locked in the antiquated nation state paradigm.  Our illustrious, omniscient PM has leap frogged light years ahead of us and, together with a few of his equally narcissistic, delusional friends (such as Bono), sees himself as a leader of the nationless, borderless new world order.

He must find it so tiresome to have to deal with our naive lack of understanding of these things.
Non-threat

Comment: O: "At the time of the Iraq invasion, Trump was not a politician and much more likely to let his true inside be known."

Well his 'true inside' at the time was support for the invasion. Tepid support, but support nonetheless.

O: "I believe him when he says he did not support the war since demonstration thereof requires action. . "

By definition, answering a question on a nationally-syndicated radio show constitutes taking an "action." 

The funny thing is that this is such a stupid issue. When asked, Trump could have said, "At the time, I was sort of for it but I wasn't really sure." Presto! No issue. Everyone would have understood because that was the mood of the country at the time. But for some reason he just isn't wired that way.
Non-threat

Comment: see what power does to people, Stephane Dion?

same as when your master, Justin elbowed the female MP after saying "Get the f.... out of my way"

power corrupts

Non-threat