In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

Example Input: Sentence: I put the heavy book on the table and it broke.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the table because the 'book' is made out of a wood, but it's not specified. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Example Output: Wrong

Example Input: Sentence: When Tommy dropped his ice cream, Timmy giggled, so father gave him a sympathetic look.
 Reason: The 'him' refers to tommy because TIMMY MORE LIKELY TO REFER TOMMY. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Example Output: Wrong

Example Input: Sentence: Alice tried frantically to stop her daughter from barking at the party, leaving us to wonder why she was behaving so strangely.
 Reason: The 'she' refers to alice's daughter because Alice daughter behaviour was strange in that party. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Example Output:
Correct