In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence can be inferred from the statement. Incorrect choices change the meaning in important ways or have details that are not mentioned in the statement. Indicate your answer as 1,2, or 3 corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.

Statement: 8. We're still your portal. Choices:  1. We are still your portal for this location alone and none other.  2. We remain your portal at the current time and place.  3. We are no longer your portal in any case.
2

Statement: When you hear that despite the fact that he has economists who know better, the Justice Department's Joel Klein apparently either believes or chooses to claim that this case is about path dependence, you start to wonder. Choices:  1. Joel Klein is lying about the case, and it's obvious why. 2. Joel Klein's claim that the case is about path dependence is fully backed up by his economists. 3. Joel Klein says that this case is about path dependence, even though the economists who work for him know that isn't true.
3

Statement: Affirmative action is likely to fail when it is merely a special preference bestowed upon those who have the right parents, whether right means educational pedigree or skin color. Choices:  1. Affirmative action seldom fails regardless of issues. 2. When affirmative action fails, it is likely due to when it is a special preference. 3. Educational pedigree or skin color falls in the category of affirmative action.

3