In this task, you're given a statement, and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence clearly disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3' corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.

Example Input: Statement: Electronic signatures meeting the aforementioned criteria, however, can provide the necessary data integrity for highly automated systems because the signature seals the data once it is applied. Choices:  1. Electronic signatures can be accepted for banking documents. 2. Electronic signatures are never safe enough. 3. Electronic signatures are often safe enough.
Example Output: 2

Example Input: Statement: In the future, Clinton and Blair say, false oppositions between competition and compassion, efficiency and equity, will be resolved. Choices:  1. Other leaders agree with the sentiment that the false oppositions between competition and compassion will be resolved. 2. Clinton feels that efficiency and equity cannot coexist, while Blair feels that this is a false opposition. 3. Clinton and Blair have very similar views on resolving certain issues.
Example Output: 2

Example Input: Statement: uh-huh you attend a lot of their games Choices:  1. You haver never been to any games, right? 2. You attend a lot of games. 3. You like to attend their games, don't you?
Example Output:
1