We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gay Marriage) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gay marriage. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gay marriage.

Input: Consider Input: The French government has solved the problem of redefining marriage by creating a legal union between any two eligible persons regardless of gender that allows the couple to have rights equal to those that are legally married.

Output: Valid


Input: Consider Input: I'm talking about the social recognition and support, which is why straight people enter into marriage.

Output: Valid


Input: Consider Input: But even if it weren't, that point is completely irrelevant because I have presented a perfectly plausible method of maintaining our current definition of the word "marriage" while still granting everyone equal rights.


Output: Valid