We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

[Q]: How can a people defend themselves from the government, unless they are able to maintain the same weapons as the government has?
[A]: Valid


[Q]: As a gun-owner and/or strong 2nd Amendment advocate, its importance cannot be overstated, and I do believe it has the potential to render a slew of local, state and federal laws null and void.
[A]: Valid


[Q]: XIII, �_ 3 (1820), in 4 id., at 2150, 2163 (���[T]hat their right to bear arms in defence of themselves and of the State cannot be questioned���).
[A]:
Valid