The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.
--------
Question: Context: 'We will likely also need to take water too. Need to be able to wash up.' 'That is fair, I also will need a good bit of firewood to keep warm as the campsite is in a colder area.' 'We dont care much for campfires. Leaves your cloths smelling for days!'
Utterance: 'Alright so I think we can make a fair deal here where we both will be happy 🙂'

Answer: No


Question: Context: 'awesome! I love the rockies. So let's try and divy up our extra supplies then. Personally, I feel that I'd need the most extra food, as I'm a rather large guy and plan to go hiking a lot during this time. Firewood would be nice, so I could have a big bonfire. What are your prefernces? ' 'i need food the most since there will be my kids and I. I can give up my firewood for food' 'Okay, so how about I get 1 food, and 3 firewood and 1 water, and you get 2 food, 0 firewood, and 2 water'
Utterance: 'sounds great'

Answer: No


Question: Context: 'The thing I need less, but still sort of want some of, is food.' 'I'm like that as well, a small appetite.' 'I need firewood the least of all though, because I have a lot of coats for warmth.'
Utterance: 'Are you bringing several coats while camping?'

Answer:
No