In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence can be inferred from the statement. Incorrect choices change the meaning in important ways or have details that are not mentioned in the statement. Indicate your answer as 1,2, or 3 corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.

[EX Q]: Statement: Against the weight of all our knowledge, do you think you could become our master that easily?  Hanson had his own doubts. Choices:  1. Given the weight of all our knowledge, can you be our leader? 2. Do you think you have what it takes to be our master? 3. Given that we know so little, couldn't you become our master?
[EX A]: 1

[EX Q]: Statement: EPA held four public hearings and received approximately 770 written comments. Choices:  1. The EPA had public hearings and millions of people came to hand in their comments. 2. The EPA had public hearings. 3. The EPA had public hearings and no one commented.
[EX A]: 2

[EX Q]: Statement: yeah their very corrupt like the Panamanians Panamanians are were very corrupt Choices:  1. All Panamanians are an example of pure corruption. 2. Panamanians are basically the least corrupt people and politicians in the world. 3. The Panamanians were very corrupt, for example.
[EX A]:
3