In this task, you will be shown a sentence, and you should determine whether it is overruling or non-overruling. In law, an overruling sentence is a statement that nullifies a previous case decision as a precedent by a constitutionally valid statute or a decision by the same or higher ranking court which establishes a different rule on the point of law involved. Classify your answers into overruling or non-overruling

Input: Consider Input: to date, appellant has neither filed a brief nor communicated with the court regarding the appeals.

Output: non-overruling


Input: Consider Input: see tex. code crim. proc. ann. art. 38.23 (west 2005) (providing that no evidence obtained in violation of constitution shall be admitted against accused and that ""[i]n any case where the legal evidence raises an issue hereunder, the jury shall be instructed that if it believes, or has a reasonable doubt, that the evidence was obtained in violation of the provisions of this article, then and in such event, the jury shall disregard any such evidence so obtained"").

Output: non-overruling


Input: Consider Input: 2 k. o'malley, j. grenig, & w. lee, federal jury practice and instructions: criminal  31:03, p. 225 (6th ed. 2008) (emphasis added); see also id.,  31:02, at 220 (explaining that a defendant must ""intend to agree and must intend that the substantive offense be committed "" (emphasis added)).


Output: non-overruling