We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

[Q]: I implied that there are people with guns that are nuts, not that all gun owners are nuts...
[A]: Valid


[Q]: If the Founding Fathers were referring to keeping and bearing arms for ANY legitimate purpose, they would have said so, in a SINGLE sentence or Amendment.
[A]: Valid


[Q]: Now that we have Heller/McDonald that clearly expand on Miller, then what will you do with this, concerning the Militia arms?
[A]:
Valid