We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Q: Sent1: You might say the criminal deserved it, but murder is murder, whether they deserved it or not.
 Sent2: You are probably going to murder somebody; hopefully it will b in a place with the death penalty and then you will get what you deserve.

A: Not similar
****
Q: Sent1: "We know for a FACT that innocent people have been put to death already"- then give me their names.
 Sent2: The list of men on death row who were found to be innocent and released is long and growing, and we can only guess how many innocents have been put to death.

A: Similar
****
Q: Sent1: There's no evidence that it actually prevents any crime (I assume you can, after all, get out of it if you admit guilt immediately and do a lot of butt-kissing, so fear of death wouldn�۪t be a factor?)
 Sent2: You can't just assume the death penalty is a crime.

A:
Not similar
****