The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.

[EX Q]: Context: 'I need firewood, because I have a medical condition that causes my veins to close if I get too cold at night. I don't mind sharing the water.' 'I could give you 1 firewood, 2 waters, and 1 food. ' 'If you make it two food, we have a deal.'
Utterance: 'I would rather let you have the third water than other food. I don't like fish. ☹️'
[EX A]: No

[EX Q]: Context: 'No, I don't take this. Because food is important for my child and me.' 'Try to understand our situation. We had food a week back. We were drinking only water for the whole week. We are dying of hunger. Kindly understand our situation.' 'Even me too facing the same, but i am ready to share one food with you. You can offer me more water to safe myself without dying. Both will be happy'
Utterance: 'Okay I shall give you 1 package of food and 2 packages of water. Is that okay for you now?'
[EX A]: No

[EX Q]: Context: 'Okay, I need firewood to stay warm and cook food. I'm willing to give up some water for more firewood.' 'Unfortunately i need the firewood. My body has trouble maintaining heat. I need as much as i can get ☹️' 'Okay, well if you need water and firewood, that only leaves food. If you can part with extra food, here's what I'm proposing'
Utterance: 'Yes you can definitely have all the food. Maybe 2 firewoods and 2 waters for me?'
[EX A]:
No