In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Q: Comment: Jesus H. Christ, it's about time someone published this! This is the information that need to be plastered on mainstream media.  We will loose this fight and that's a god damn guarantee! It's asshole's who post Youtube videos of their suction dredging and drool over their fucking miniscule amounts of Au in front of the entire world who has fucked us! This Asshole, Dave Mc Cracken and his Happy Camp Methadone patients that go into peoples back yards with their 6" Proline's and dredge their birdbaths because they can is fucking bullshit!!  Happy Camp, California needs to go! he IS the clown that brought ALL of this bullshit from the Left. Why you ask? Well I'll fucking tell you why since no one else will. Seriously, 70 fucking miles this asshole had claimed for his newbies to royally piss off the Karuk not to mention the other people who live up there. NEWSFLASH!! Why didn't HE defy the ban and get arrested in '15 to show the world his stand instead of his brainwashed assholes? Fuck him!

A: Obscene
****
Q: Comment: "It does seem a little hypocritical for Dogwood to be complaining about Kinder Morgan playing a role in the B.C. election through its donations to the BC Liberals, when it is receiving money from the United States to fight for causes aligned with interests there. "
In one case, foreign interests donate money to advocacy groups.
In the other, foreign interests donate money to a political party whose members currently form the provincial government. 
Not even remotely equivalent, Gary, and tf. hardly hypocritical of Dogwood to complain about it.

A: Non-obscene
****
Q: Comment: #MAWA!

A:
Non-obscene
****