The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the no-need strategy, otherwise output No. no-need is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used when a participant points out that they do not need an item based on personal context such as suggesting that they have ample water to spare. no-need can directly benefit the opponent since it implies that the item is up for grabs.

[EX Q]: Context: 'Camping yay!' 'Hello! how are you? hoping today is finding you well. I was wondering if I can get all 3 of your Firewood, I am willing to trade for all 3 waters. I am camping with 40 kids, its our annual youth camp. its rainy season too, I really want to ensure I have enough dried wood with us. need lots of firewood for the amount of cooking I will be doing, keep the camp warm, and specially to keep those pesky bugs away. what do you think?' 'I could really use the firewood too, it will be very cold where we are going. Since it will be cold, we will not be drinking much water. How about 2 firewood for you, 3 food for me?, '
Utterance: 'May I ask how many are going camping with you, i would agree, but the needs of children are different than adults. I will need at least 1 food, to ensure I have enough for the kids. '
[EX A]: No

[EX Q]: Context: 'Oh, I see what you did there. No problem I have plenty of firewood for you buddy. 🙂' 'Great! What extra supplies would you like to bring?' 'Since it's hot there, I get thirsty and dry real quick. 😡'
Utterance: 'Oh ok, well I plan on bringing some juice, beer and other drinks. So I could spare some extra water. And I am pretty good at fishing, so I won't need much food either'
[EX A]: Yes

[EX Q]: Context: 'True we can , I'd be willing to just take one of the foods if you'd be willing to do that ? Then we can decide on the others ' '🙂v it sound's like we're on the right track! I'll gladly take 2 Food. How would you feel about taking all of the Water, while I take all of the Firewood?' 'Not really liking that , but I'd be willing to split the water with you if I could take 2 of those 🙂'
Utterance: 'OK, you take 2 of the Water, and I take 1. That just leaves the Firewood. How about 2 for me and 1 for you?'
[EX A]:
No