Given a document, find the main entity about whom the author is writing. Write the full name if mentioned in the text. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].
--------
Question: London (AFP) â Kevin De Bruyne was the creative fulcrum of Manchester Cityâs latest demolition job  while Mousa Dembele inspired Tottenhamâs north London derby triumph.
 Dembele  the midfield maestro
 Mousa Dembele  underlined  his  status as one of Tottenhamâs unsung heroes with a dominant display in their 1-0 win over north London rivals Arsenal. It was Harry Kaneâs latest goal-scoring exploits against the Gunners that took centre-stage at Wembley  but the platform of that success was built by  the industrious Dembele . Embodying Mauricio Pochettinoâs obsession with physical intensity  while more than capable of picking a decisive pass  Dembele out-shone Arsenal in the midfield engine room  earning praise from  his  manager. âLast season  he  played so well  this season  he  suffered a problem in  his  ankle and struggled in pre-season. Now  he  is playing well again â Pochettino said. â He  is an unbelievable player. We have to be careful about  his  fitness. When  he  can train  he  can make this type of performance.â
As if losing 1-0 to struggling Newcastle wasnât enough to have Jose Mourinho seething  the Manchester United boss once again had to suffer the frustration of  Paul  Pogbaâs latest flop. Mourinho had restored Pogba to the starting line-up after dropping him for Unitedâs previous match â a decision inspired by the former Juventus midfielderâs limp efforts in a defeat at Tottenham. But rather than grasp the opportunity to get back in Mourinhoâs good books just days after his boss had defended their relationship  Pogba was again a largely anonymous figure at St Jamesâ Park. By the time he was substituted midway through the second half  United were already trailing  but publicly at least  Mourinho remains supportive. âNo problems â he said when asked about the France international. âI wanted a better way (in midfield) against a side that was defending in a block. I wanted the simplicity of Michael Carrick.â

Answer: Mousa Dembele


Question: Trump took to Twitter on Tuesday to claim that Tennessee Republican helped "give us" the nuclear deal with Iran negotiated by President Barack Obama's administration. Earlier this month  he claimed that  Corker  is "largely responsible for the horrendous Iran Deal!"
 Corker  the chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee   was in fact a vehement critic of the deal that emerged from international negotiations in the summer of 2015. After the deal was unveiled   he  wrote in an op-ed for The Washington Post that "Congress should reject this deal and send it back to the President."
 Corker  plotted efforts to block the deal  banding with Republicans -- and even some Democrats -- in an attempt to block the deal.
The following month   Corker  did just that  joining with the bipartisan group to vote against the deal. A procedural vote to move forward a resolution to reject the nuclear deal fell shy of the required 60-vote threshold.
Even before that vote   Corker  helped push through the legislation that would ultimately grant Congress powers to review the deal  which the Obama administration contemplated approving without congressional oversight.
 Corker  said such an attempt would be "a direct affront to the American people and seeks to undermine Congress' appropriate role" in a March 2015 letter to Obama.
 Corker 's calls for congressional review of the nuclear deal that was still being negotiated in the spring of 2015 ultimately led to the Iran Nuclear Agreement Review Act  which Obama ultimately signed despite initially opposing the measure.
That could be what White House press secretary Sarah Sanders was referring to on October 10 when she claimed: " Sen. Corker  worked with Nancy Pelosi and the Obama administration to pave the way for that legislation and basically rolled out the red carpet for the Iran deal  and those are pretty factual."
 Corker  defended the bill against that criticism in September 2015  noting that the legislation "actually took power back from the president."
"Without it  he could have unilaterally implemented the deal immediately. The President never would have been forced to submit the agreement to Congress and there would have been no review and no debate on this critical national security issue "  Corker  said then.
Trump's criticism of  Corker  on the Iran deal is also curious given that Trump initially considered  Corker  as a candidate for vice president and later secretary of state  in large part due to his foreign policy chops.

Answer: Corker


Question: The discovery brings researchers one step closer to understanding how it is that humans developed art and language and religion — the types of symbolic and cultural expressions that have always been thought to elevate humans from other species  said archaeologist  Alistair Pike  of Britain’s University of Southampton  who was part of the research team.
“It’s almost the definition of being human ”  Pike  told The Washington Post. “It’s how we define ourselves as different from other animals and primates  having language and cultural expression. There’s been a lot of work trying to understand where in Homo sapiens’s lineage did we first become symbolic individuals?”
Perhaps   Pike  said   it  started with Neanderthals.
Still  Stringer stressed that there is still not definite proof of Neanderthals’ ability to make figurative art — of animals and people — because the animals the researchers found on the paintings in Spain have uncertain origins.  Pike  said  it  was not entirely clear whether humans may have stumbled upon the Neanderthal paintings and simply added to them with the vague animal drawings  or if they were a part of the original Neanderthal designs; the researchers have not yet dated them   he  said.
The discovery that they did not  in fact  need the help of modern humans puts Neanderthals and humans on a more level playing field   Pike  said  given that tens of thousands of years ago  modern humans weren’t all that sophisticated either. The end goal with this research  he said  is to understand how the brain became wired for symbolic expression — but that’s going to require a lot more cave discoveries.
“If we’re going to try to find out when we started thinking like humans  we’re going to have to go back further in time ”  Pike  said. “What we’re interested in is when the brain became modern  and that’s a really difficult thing to get at. You can see how big it was by looking at the size of the skull  but it’s really hard to know how it was wired inside. If the use of symbols and symbolic behavior can be used as a proxy for how the brain was wired  then we can understand how the brain evolved.”
The Neanderthals went extinct about 5 000 years after humans arrived in Europe. The suspected causes have ranged from climate change that affected available food to competition with modern humans. As research moves forward   Pike  said  it may be useful to keep in mind that perhaps humans and Neanderthals were not as different as we thought.
“There’s always been a sense that all this expression  this art  arrived with modern humans  and Neanderthals might have been copying them in the very late period of their existence ”  Pike  said. But wouldn’t it be interesting if it was in fact the other way around? Modern humans may have landed on the moon — but they started out in the same place as Neanderthals.”

Answer:
Alistair Pike