In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

[Q]: Sentence: Emma did not pass the ball to Janie although she saw that she was open.
 Reason: The 'she' refers to emma because Emma was the one who did not pass the ball; Janie was the one open. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
[A]: Correct


[Q]: Sentence: Anne gave birth to a daughter last month. She is a very charming baby.
 Reason: The 'She' refers to anne's daughter because Annes daughter is not old enough to be charming yet. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
[A]: Wrong


[Q]: Sentence: I can't cut that tree down with that axe; it is too thick.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the tree because an axe being too small would prevent you from using it to cut down a tree. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
[A]:
Wrong