In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

[Q]: Comment: The malignant narcissist makes another trip for selfies and the chance to make more mindless political statements. Also another opportunity to sell his newest $40 caps made in China
[A]: Non-sexual-explicit


[Q]: Comment: Boots>   I double, triple, quadruple phooey to you!!!!  As I mentioned, there you go again like the broken record that you and allie are.  Nothing worthwhile to contribute as usual.  Only sarcasm and same old, same old bs.  Must you continue to embarrass yourself????
[A]: Non-sexual-explicit


[Q]: Comment: Now, here's a few problems with what you wrote.
You assume men have higher sex drives. They don't nor ever had, otherwise the pill wouldn't have made a difference, if men wanted it more and that's what gave women power over men then they'd still have that power. Somehow they don't. And yet it seems sex wasn't the power they held, weirdly enough we hear a lot about past "shotgun weddings", let me tell you something poor women worked, dad was liable to fund them until they married and yet there was were shotgun weddings concentrated.
And yet a lot of wedlock kids happened with kids who still saw their daddies and were directly supported by them but mom wanted nothing with dad. So it seems women were still fucking for the reason they always fucked, fucking itself. Women lined up the docks for the same reasons girls line up the sports block, to see hot men who are there to work not please them sexually.
[A]:
Sexual-explicit