We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

[Q]: Sent1: If we continue to allow the death penalty, we are no better than the murderers and rapists that we punish with the death penalty.
 Sent2: What we need are harsher sentences including the death penalty.
[A]: Not similar


[Q]: Sent1: The fact remains that life in prison is cheaper than sentencing one to the death penalty.
 Sent2: And no one said that life in prision is "much worse" then the death penalty.
[A]: Not similar


[Q]: Sent1: Like I said I would just want them to actually have to deal with the consequences and not get an easy out, which is what executing them does.
 Sent2: I say if they try to kill/escape from life w/o parole in prison that's all we should need for the death penalty.
[A]:
Not similar