In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Example Input: Comment: ...whew, I thought Glenn Beck was just a simple nut, you however sound like King Cashew.
Example Output: Non-obscene

Example Input: Comment: Do you see the paradox?  Gun people always scream about mental health...whenever tragedy occurs, we hear how it has absolutely nothing to do with the availability of guns and everything to do with mental health.  Then when people try to get at those mental health concerns before a tragedy - that gets decried as well.  Damned if you do, damned if you don't I guess.
Example Output: Obscene

Example Input: Comment: First of all, how is this news?  Were any of you in doubt, even a little, that Donald Trump objectifies women and makes lewd remarks about them? That he's a misogynist pig? 

"Trump's running mate, Pence, was at a diner in Toledo when the news broke."  Ya gotta love that line---WHAT NEWS?  Something the Donald said ten years ago on the set of a TV show? 

I have to agree with the Trumpets on this one.  This is a hit-piece masquerading as news, but it's not even that simple:  This is the MEDIA as carnival barker, hustling you for your time, attention, and money, getting you all amped-up for the SHOWDOWN OF THE CENTURY, a political contest that relies on innuendo and gossip rather than substance or real issues.

It also completely puts the knuckle-dragger vote in the bag for Trump.

Good Grief
Example Output:
Non-obscene