instruction:
We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.
question:
You have conceded that a difference in neurophysiologic fitness makes sense, but we should decide on a case by case basis.
answer:
Invalid


question:
If you are going to argue for or against the death penalty, at least try to be a credit to the argument and present something that makes sense.
answer:
Valid


question:
What I'm supporting is the death of people the justice system has ruled as being bad enough that they're worth killing.
answer:

Valid