In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: threat and non-threat. Threat is a statement that someone will be hurt or harmed, especially if the person does not do something in particular.

Input: Consider Input: Comment: Like his late dead daddy, JT must be anti-semitic.  He has remained silent to the Montreal guy who says we should punch Zionist Jews in the face.  If he promises to really do it, I would go to Montreal and he can punch me.  Guess I could punch him back.

Output: Threat


Input: Consider Input: Comment: shoot, shovel , n shut up

Output: Threat


Input: Consider Input: Comment: The "All Muslims are bad", and the "ISIS is Islam" words are opinions; they're just ideas. And yes, they may be myths as you assert. 

But Islam itself is just an idea and its god is a myth. Again, that's also an opinion, another idea.

But it doesn't mean I hate you or want you or your opinions, ideas, and beliefs 'extinguished'-- it means I wish to have a conversation-- and this is what the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms provides for all Canadians.

If you find these words offensive, I'm sorry to hear that-- but being offended is neither an argument, nor is it protected under the Charter. To engage in conversation requires all of us to grow some thick skin, and learn that living in a modern society requires compromise.

There are two choices in human political interaction: 1. Conversation; 2. Violence. I choose conversation.

Take your pick.


Output: Non-threat