Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.

Ex Input:
In Washington, many informed voters chose not to submit their primary ballot because they knew the delegates were already divided and it was used simply for the Democrats to collect information. It was widely advertised in the local papers there that the primary was in fact meaningless. Thus, the primary ballot was also not at all representative of reflecting the will of the voters.

Ex Output:
No


Ex Input:
Except that it is government " demanding I give them my resources, time .....for free", not corporate America.

Ex Output:
No


Ex Input:
The rape, ruin, and run boys are driving the bus..off the cliff.  It`s their job, it`s what they do.   Judge Gleason, based on "discovered" internal BP documents, told the state (2006 TAPS valuation trial) that it was "too trusting" in dealing with oil companies and their promises (instead of contracts) of "more" or "new" production and "revenue for the state", if only they were given massive up-front tax breaks and subsidies. They hire the best in the world to get that done. 
 And this legislature is helping them get it done.  One of the BP "internal documents" that w discovered in a state/BP tax trial, stated that their Alaska leases would be wildly profitable to at least 2065, and that was EVEN if MO MORE new oil was ever discovered!   It`s time to end Meyer`s "crapshoot" SB21, and end the billion a year in cash credits they have extorted from the state each year going forward.   Thank you Dispatch for the forum, and the open exchange of ideas and opinion shared in this arena.

Ex Output:

No