We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Q: Sent1: You argue that the ban worked, yet at the same time you claim that gun makers found a way around the law, releasing the same weapons as before but in a way that made them technically legal.
 Sent2: You claimed that the Supreme Court gave the green light to all kinds of bans and restrictions on guns and ammunition, something that never took place.

A: Not similar
****
Q: Sent1: I see you always use gun crime rates as an argument, are you totally uninterested in other types of violent crimes, what happens when all guns are banned and we only have knife crimes?
 Sent2: Using a shotgun or an AK-47 will get the job done, so I don't see the need to ban assault weapons.

A: Not similar
****
Q: Sent1: Do you have anything to offer from King on guns, or for that matter, the 2nd.
 Sent2: You're right that gun control isn't about guns, however, but 'control' is a secondary matter, a means to an end.

A:
Not similar
****