In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence can be inferred from the statement. Incorrect choices change the meaning in important ways or have details that are not mentioned in the statement. Indicate your answer as 1,2, or 3 corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.

Q: Statement: When you hear that despite the fact that he has economists who know better, the Justice Department's Joel Klein apparently either believes or chooses to claim that this case is about path dependence, you start to wonder. Choices:  1. Joel Klein is lying about the case, and it's obvious why. 2. Joel Klein's claim that the case is about path dependence is fully backed up by his economists. 3. Joel Klein says that this case is about path dependence, even though the economists who work for him know that isn't true.

A: 3
****
Q: Statement: More generally, we need to comprehensively examine opportunities for better using the federal government's career SES leadership. Choices:  1. We need to find more ways to destroy the government's SES leadership program.  2. We need to look for opportunities to use SES leadership in a better way.  3. The school board needs to look for better ways to use SES leadership from the government. 

A: 2
****
Q: Statement: The dollar value for LRS is the average of the dollar values for the 11 different types of LRS. Choices:  1. The dollar value of the eleven different types of LRS equal the dollar value for LRS.  2. The increasing dollar value for LRS is the average of the huge range of values of the differing types of LRS.  3. The LRS dollar value has no relationship to the differing types of LRS. 

A:
1
****