The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.

Input: Consider Input: Context: 'Hmm.  And why do you need so much food?' 'I need an extra supply of food, as I exercise a lot! 🙂' 'Hmmm.  And the firewood?'
Utterance: 'I get cold easily. I need the firewood to get warm. I might catch a cold.🙂'

Output: No


Input: Consider Input: Context: 'Kindly understand our need as we are struggling with hunger now.' 'At the same from my side. We need foods because my child is hunger' 'We with our kids undergone fasting in the recent days, so we are hungry to the peak'
Utterance: 'What did you expect from me? Because same position is here also'

Output: Yes


Input: Consider Input: Context: 'cringe ☹️. Ill take one firewood and two of both water and food ' 'Sorry - I just cant do that.  I want to come to an agreement but dont feel that its fair.  ' 'But your getting more of the high value item!!!!'
Utterance: 'Hmmmm. So what if I get 2 firewood, 2 waters.  You would get one firewood, 1 water and 3 of the food items????? '


Output: No