In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine the neutral choice based on your inference from the statement and your commonsense knowledge. The neutral choice is a sentence that neither agrees nor disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3', corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence. If sentence X agrees with sentence Y, one's correctness follows from the other one. If sentence X disagrees with sentence Y, they can not be correct at the same time.

[Q]: Statement: During their Directoire, a new wave of executions ' the White (royalist) Terror ' decimated the Jacobins and their supporters. Choices: 1. No executions of Jacobins and their supporters took place. 2. Many of the Jacobins and their supporters were executed. 3. The Jacobins and their supporters were terrified by the wave of executions.
[A]: 3


[Q]: Statement: Ongoing monitoring enables an organization to measure how well it is doing, track performance measures, and adjust control activities based on the results of monitoring activities. Choices: 1. The monitoring can be done by technology, such as cameras or sensors, or done by a crew of humans tasked to be objective and observant.  2. There are no merits, benefits, or opportunities to be gained from an organization having ongoing monitoring.  3. Track performance measures and adjusting control activities are two of the opportunities enabled by having ongoing monitoring.
[A]: 1


[Q]: Statement: The truth of the matter was that it was Lawrence who had murdered Alfred Inglethorp with a croquet 114 mallet.  Choices: 1. Nobody knows who murdered Mr. Inglethorp. 2. Alfred Inglethorp was murdrered by Lawrence with a croquet mallet. 3. Lawrence owned the croquet mallet used to murder Alfred Inglethorp.
[A]:
3