We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gay Marriage) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gay marriage. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gay marriage.

[Q]: If we regarded every decision we do not like as tyrannical simply because it's not what we would decide, then we are in trouble.
[A]: Invalid


[Q]: If two people love each other, it should be more than enough for them to dedicate their lives to one another, regardless of whether they're white, black, gay, bi, retarded, disabled, or geniuses.
[A]: Valid


[Q]: If the "wasting of semen" (I find it hilarious you actually think that's an intelligent complaint) is condemnable for gay sex, then it is JUST AS CONDEMNABLE for oral sex, condoms, and masturbation.
[A]:
Valid