The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the no-need strategy, otherwise output No. no-need is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used when a participant points out that they do not need an item based on personal context such as suggesting that they have ample water to spare. no-need can directly benefit the opponent since it implies that the item is up for grabs.

Input: Consider Input: Context: 'I agree.' 'I myself love food, so food is a big deal to me. ' 'Ok.  I like water over firewood.'
Utterance: 'Yeah, firewood isn't really something that's "essential" I'd have to say. Yeah, you need it, but still.'

Output: Yes


Input: Consider Input: Context: 'Hi, I need the all food package. I will frequently feel hungry' 'I can give you two of the packages if you're willing to give me all 3 of the firewood. I left mine out in the rain a couple of nights ago so its all ruined.' 'If I will give 2 firewood for you and I will take all the food package with 2 water.'
Utterance: 'I need all 3 firewood! But I'm willing to discuss food with you. I have a lot of that.'

Output: Yes


Input: Consider Input: Context: 'hello' 'Hey! How are you? My bestie and I were going to be going on a camping trip, but my other friends heard about it and wanted to come along so we're going to need more supplies than I initially though which has got me a little worried. ☹️'
Utterance: 'Yes!!! I need some water pretty bad.  I am good on food because I fish and I have been able to catch some catfish from the lake.  How about I take 2 water 2 firewood and 1 food'


Output: Yes