Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.

[EX Q]: But they aren't being given to her 'homeless' to live in for free.  That's the problem with them.  
Of course, if you want to see what happens to an apartment provided to her 'homeless' friends, take a look at what's left of the motel on 7th Street which was featured in a recent R-G article.  Those were subsidized by government money and destroyed by the people for whom they were provided.
[EX A]: No

[EX Q]: We have 90+ schools empty 1/3rd of the time also nights weekends and holidays, lets use them. Save money. Excellent venues to interact with constituents. The Capital and offices are in Juneau.
[EX A]: No

[EX Q]: It is a pretty flat pay scale for the nano guy. As a long-time full professor in engineering/computer science in San Diego he was probably making $175,000 a year or more. So he doubles his pay to become chief of a huge research center, and makes ~10X more than the lowest-paid employee. He probably makes less than some of the doctors in the institute.
[EX A]:
No