Given a document, an entity and its sentiment towards the entity, verify if it is the correct sentiment towards the entity. Answer should be yes or no. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].
--------
Question: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity George Papadopoulos is Positive . Democrats on Wednesday questioned again whether Attorney General Jeff Sessions was forthcoming with Congress amid news reports  he  killed a suggestion by  former Trump campaign adviser George Papadopoulos  to set up a meeting with Republican candidate Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin.
"Jeff Sessions concealed his meetings with Russians  and he had an obligation to be more forthcoming about the meeting that involved  Papadopoulos  as well " Connecticut Sen. Richard Blumenthal  a member of the Judiciary Committee  told Manu Raju on CNN.
"In fact  one of the points of question is whether  Papadopoulos  in that charging document where there's a reference to a campaign supervisor was  in fact  talking to Jeff Sessions."
According to charging documents unsealed Monday in Russia special counsel Robert Mueller's probe   Papadopoulos  suggested in a July 2016 meeting that  he  should make efforts to connect Trump with Putin.
Trump  who was at the meeting of campaign advisers  "didn't say yes and  he  didn't say no " an official who was in the room told CNN about the meeting.
 Papadopoulos   30  a Trump foreign policy adviser  pleaded guilty to lying to the FBI  according to the unsealed documents in Mueller's investigation.

Answer: no


Question: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Team Trump is Neutral . As Hanson explains  using a document paid for by the Clinton campaign (the discredited Russian dossier)  the Obama administration engaged in an unprecedented abuse of power through the FISA courts as a means to spy on the  Trump  campaign  and  as we now know  this of course included actual wiretaps.
This brazen spying and the overall Russia hoax was almost certainly the âinsurance policyâ Strzok and Page discussed with McCabe in the event of an unlikely  Trump  victory.
But even if  Trump  had lost  that policy was still going to be used by President Hillary and  her  minions within the media and federal law enforcement as a bludgeon to personally destroy  Trump  as a Russian stooge â and by extension  to destroy his MAGA movement  which terrifies the political and media establishment even more than the Tea Party.
However   Trump  did win  and as we now know  almost immediately after this victory the âinsurance policyâ was given the green-light. The first wave of this insurance policy came in the form of unceasing leaks to the Deep Stateâs most reliable co-conspirators â a compliant media.
If they did not already know  it was through these illegal leaks that the media learned that the Obama administration had spied on  Team Trump  both during and after the election. Although they now regret reporting this fact  we know the media knew about Obamaâs spying because  time and again and again  the media gleefully reported the fact that the Obama administration had spied on  Team Trump  (these media reports are all documented in detail here).
You see  in their own fevered minds  the media seemed certain that if the public was told that  Trump âs collusion with the Russians was so serious  his  team had to be surveilled by federal law enforcement   his  presidency would be over even before it began. Hence  the insurance policy.
What the Deep State and its media collaborators did not count on  though  was  Trump .
On March 4  early on a Saturday morning   Trump  tweeted  âTerrible! Just found out that Obama had my âwires tappedâ in Trump Tower just before the victory. Nothing found. This is McCarthyism!â â and this tweet blew the #ReleaseTheMemo scandal wide open.
So soothed were media provincials by the velvet-lined bubbleâs reassurance that  Trump  had no chance of becoming president  they did not plan far enough about what to do if  Trump  won.
And so  after  Trump  did win  for two whole weeks  the media did something it had not done for eight years  albeit accidentally â told the truth about the Obama administrationâs unprecedented politicization of the surveillance state.

Answer: no


Question: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity LeBron James is Positive . CLOSE SportsPulse: USA TODAY Sports' Sam Amick and AJ Neuharth-Keusch break down the drama between LeBron James and the New York Knicks. USA TODAY Sports
On one side of the NBA ledger  the 11-3 defending champions have won seven consecutive games by an average of 19.8 points while boasting the leagueâs best offense (116.2 points scored per 100 possessions) and the 7th-best defense (101.8 points allowed per 100). On the other  where the revamped Cavaliers have been working in seven new players while waiting for new point guard Isaiah Thomas to recover from his hip injury and make his debut  the 7-7 Cavs have been the leagueâs worst defensive squad by a long shot (111.1 points allowed per 100; Dallas is 29th at 108.7) while leaning ever-so heavily on LeBron James.
Cleveland Cavaliers forward LeBron James (23  right) defends against Golden State Warriors forward Draymond Green (23) during the fourth quarter in game four of the 2017 NBA Finals at Quicken Loans Arena. (Photo: Kyle Terada-USA TODAY Sports)
A: âTo a certain extent yes. And to a certain extent  no. I don't think anyone should be panicking 12 games in  or 13 games in. However  there are some glaring concerns with them. And at the same time  you're missing a 30-point (per game) player (in Thomas) on the bench who's hurt. So my concern would be that  LeBron  is playing so many minutes right now (James  in  his  15th season  is leading the league in minutes at 38.1 per game; itâs his highest mark since the 2010-11 season).
âYeah  he's super human but eventually his super human powers go away  so that would be more of my concern if I'm a Cavs fan or somebody with the Cavs or a player  is like 'Man  he's been playing a lot of 40 minute (nights) and it's only Nov. 12.' But I wouldn't be pressing the panic button just yet. At the end of the day  they know how to win. They've got a guy who knows how to win  so I wouldn't necessarily press the panic button. I would see certain things and I would panic about those certain things  just becauseâ¦I don't think nobody should be playing 40 minutes a game in November ( James  has played 40-plus minutes in six of  his  14 games).

Answer:
no