instruction:
In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence can be inferred from the statement. Incorrect choices change the meaning in important ways or have details that are not mentioned in the statement. Indicate your answer as 1,2, or 3 corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.
question:
Statement: When you hear that despite the fact that he has economists who know better, the Justice Department's Joel Klein apparently either believes or chooses to claim that this case is about path dependence, you start to wonder. Choices:  1. Joel Klein is lying about the case, and it's obvious why. 2. Joel Klein's claim that the case is about path dependence is fully backed up by his economists. 3. Joel Klein says that this case is about path dependence, even though the economists who work for him know that isn't true.
answer:
3


question:
Statement: Incorporated in its structure are fragments of medieval and Renaissance architecture and sculpture. Choices:  1. THe structure is only influenced by modern architecture. 2. Joined in its structure are pieces of medieval and Renaissance design and model. 3. The structure has big heavy beams that make you think of medieval times.
answer:
2


question:
Statement: So, they compensate with vocabulary, animating their play with exaggerated violence and tough talk, smashing, kicking, and zapping the imaginary bad guys. Choices:  1. They did not have any bad guys in their plays, real or imaginary. 2. Their plays feature affected violence, and fights against imaginary bad guys. 3. People who watched their play thought it was too violent.
answer:

2