We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

Example Input: Basically, The US Curcuit Court upheld that the Second Amendment didn't apply to weapons that couldn't be carried by an individual.
Example Output: Valid

Example Input: This study has been cited by gun proponents before as support for the tempting cross-national assumption that: ���England severely restricts gun possession and sees a rise in robbery rates that now exceeds armed America.���
Example Output: Valid

Example Input: It's pretty easy to find information on the FBI and the CDC websites that shows that more people die in gun accidents than criminals die in legally justifiable self defense shootings.
Example Output:
Valid