We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

[EX Q]: Sent1: So what happens is they call for more protection, more security, more police, more laws, more protection.
 Sent2: 35) Private citizens don't need a gun for self-protection because the police are there to protect them even though the Supreme Court says the police are not responsible for their protection.
[EX A]: Not similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: Do you have anything to offer from King on guns, or for that matter, the 2nd.
 Sent2: You're right that gun control isn't about guns, however, but 'control' is a secondary matter, a means to an end.
[EX A]: Not similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: Rather, if firearms availability does matter, the data consistently show that the way it matters is that more guns equal less violent crime.
 Sent2: The opposite of "more guns = less crime is not true" is not "more guns = more crime".
[EX A]:
Not similar