We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Input: Consider Input: Sent1: Only .06% of people who have killed kill again when they escape, are released, etc.
 Sent2: So as long as only some innocent people are killed for crimes they didn't commit then the system must be sound.

Output: Not similar


Input: Consider Input: Sent1: So should we be able to impose the sentence of life without parole, all the while understanding that we may have put an innocent man in prison for life?
 Sent2: As long as we sentence people to a life in prison we are also GUARANTEED to sentence an innocent person.

Output: Similar


Input: Consider Input: Sent1: i think the death penalty should be abolished because some people are sentenced to deathfor a crime they might have not committed.
 Sent2: Over 40 countries have abolished the death penalty for all crimes since 1990.


Output: Not similar