We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Example Input: Almost like how a liberal will bemoan a corporations concearn for it's share holders over thinking of the damage it does to the environment and shoddly product it pushes onto consumers.
Example Output: Invalid

Example Input: But the killing of innocent lives is a crime of almost every nation and by the way, this has gone to the point of needing another thread.
Example Output: Valid

Example Input: If these bleak prospects aren't enough to deter someone from committing a serious crime, what will ramping it up to the death penalty do?
Example Output:
Valid