In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.
--------
Question: Comment: They know a sucker when they see one.

Answer: Non-sexual-explicit


Question: Comment: well done marge.... lets stop breeding a bunch of pussies at our learning centers

Answer: Sexual-explicit


Question: Comment: It would help our general understandings of  human sexuality within the Catholic Church if it just weren't aging male celibates conducting the discourse.

Frankly, we need a Catholic "Vagina Monologues Tour" in every diocese, parish, university were women would feel free to tell their own stories about their own sexuality:  No shaming allowed!

From my own clinical experience, a lot of the issue with Catholic male celibates is that few if any have any primary emotional and intimate relationships with women.  Like any human, priests naturally fear what they have little if any personal experience.  [Human sexuality is something that "intellectualizing it" - too much in their heads??? - like it is done in most seminaries has not worked, will not work.]

A colleague- a Sulpician priest who worked in seminaries - once told me that when screening candidates he looked for evidence of men ever having "been laid" as an positive indicator of their fitness for ordination.  Made sense to me ...

Answer:
Sexual-explicit