Given a document, an entity and its sentiment towards the entity, verify if it is the correct sentiment towards the entity. Answer should be yes or no. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].
--------
Question: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Mark Sargent is Negative . Mark Sargent  a software analyst from Boulder now living in Seattle   is the primary organizer of the movement and has made more than a thousand videos.  He  believes Colorado’s open-mindedness accounts for its prominent position among believers.
Back in 2015  when  he  typed “flat Earth” into YouTube  he ’d get 50 000 hits. Now it’s more than 18.7 million  beating out Lady Gaga and closing in on Donald Trump at about 21.3 million.  Sargent  said  he  suspects millions of believers remain “in the closet” to avoid ridicule.
“My channel broke 10 million views in December ”  he  said. “This is my full-time job now.”
Sargent  49  became a believer after watching videos and realizing  he  could “no longer prove the globe.”
The flat Earth revival   he  said  can be explained in large part by YouTube  increased skepticism of authority and the message of hope it conveys.
“Science doesn’t even get their arguments out there ”  Sargent  said. “They try to beat us with math but people don’t understand it. It might as well be static  so they listen to  me .”

Answer: no


Question: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Mitt Romney is Positive . "Mitt Romney .

Answer: no


Question: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Kering is Positive . FRANKFURT/LONDON (Reuters) -  Gucci-owner Kering (PRTP.PA)  plans to spin off German sports brand Puma (PUMG.DE) to the French conglomerate’s shareholders as  it  sharpens the group’s focus squarely on its luxury brands.
 Kering  said  it  planned to distribute 70 percent of Puma shares in kind to  its  investors  leaving  it  with only a 16 percent stake in the sportwear group  confirming an exclusive Reuters report.
 Kering  is a little more than 40 percent controlled by the French Pinault family  who would receive about 29 percent of the sporting goods company  while Puma’s free float would stand at about 55 percent.
Shedding Puma  meanwhile  would turn  Kering  into a pure player in the high-margin luxury business  where  it  rivals larger peers such as French conglomerate LVMH (LVMH.PA).
 “Kering  would dedicate  itself  entirely to the development of  its  luxury houses ”  Kering  Chairman and CEO Francois-Henri Pinault said in a statement.
Puma struggled for years after it was bought by Kering for 5.3 billion euros ($6.4 billion) in 2007  but recent improved performance has raised expectations that the French group would sell its stake this year.
Puma’s shares rose by 45 percent over the past year  bringing its market capitalisation to 5.3 billion euros  back at the level at which  Kering  bought.
 Kering  emerged as one of the big winners in a luxury goods revival last year as Chinese demand picked up  with a stellar turn at brand-of-the-moment Gucci helping earnings and other labels such as Yves Saint Laurent and Balenciaga.

Answer:
yes