TASK DEFINITION: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.
PROBLEM: Comment: Hogwash Gary - You cannot have your cake and eat it too. That is what I disrespect most about evolutionists, is the hypocrisy. If you are going to live by the sword, you must die by it. At least have the courage to admit and accept it. And why is sexual violence any more unacceptable that violence, the fact is you have no foundation as a Darwinist to condemn anything of this nature. If you are going to travel down this road, then you MUST defend animals we eat, and every other act of "violence" that imposes an outside will upon another being. I can discuss any topic rationally with any person, but hypocrisy is something I will not deal with.

SOLUTION: Non-sexual-explicit

PROBLEM: Comment: I'd still like to meet boots for a one-on-one scrap! Still sucking on hiLIARy's exhaust you little p*ssy!!

SOLUTION: Sexual-explicit

PROBLEM: Comment: More white man's guilt I see, Elizabeth. What a dreadful column. I'm not a big flag waver and have no interest in being forced to party just because Heritage Canada says I should but this loathing has to stop. Canada, as we know it, is 150 years old. End of story.

SOLUTION:
Non-sexual-explicit