The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.

[EX Q]: Context: 'If you need water for a medical issue the of course you can have two waters.' 'You are being very kind then, im elderly so trying to make fresh water by boiling it from getting it from a river was concerning to me. How about you take all three of the food for your kiddo's' 'That sounds fair. The kids can bathe in the stream. We are good with 2 food packs.'
Utterance: 'Lol, wish i could. Then you take all 3 of the firewood, I'll take 2 of the Water and 1 of the food, sound good?'
[EX A]: No

[EX Q]: Context: 'Looking forward to this camping trip!  I am hoping we can find something amicable with these additional resources.' 'I'm excited too 🙂. Things have been stressful lately. What are some things that you value most?' 'It's supposed to be chilly where we are heading and I could really use some extra firewood.  🙂  What about you?'
Utterance: 'I really need food and firewood. Could you do 3 firewood and 3 food packages? My son has a problem with poor sugar levels which cause him to convulse when cold and doesn't eat enough food.'
[EX A]: Yes

[EX Q]: Context: 'Me too. It has been rather cold lately! But I am also really interested in water.' 'I don't need the water as much.  How about I get 2 firewood and you get 2 water?' 'I would prefer all the water. You can have all of the firewood.'
Utterance: 'That sounds good to me.  What about the food?'
[EX A]:
No