We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

[EX Q]: You would rather be confronted by a guy with a baseball bat because you are FAR more likely to get killed by the guy with the gun.
[EX A]: Valid

[EX Q]: So anybody who has a gun for self protection is now dead because they dont have guns, just the criminals.
[EX A]: Valid

[EX Q]: In addition to the Education Code, the Gun-Free School Zone Act of 1995 bars possession of firearms within 1,000 feet of a school, but there are exceptions for private property and for lawful transportation of non-concealable weapons.
[EX A]:
Valid