In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

[EX Q]: Comment: During the day I believe he went to prospective houses where he hoped to harm individuals, knocking on doors during the day where he asked for work.  He is an admitted liar.  He is manipulative producing his penciled writing.  It may be the cover story.  He is definitely a thug perhaps for political purposes.  He may not be who he presents himself at all.  He may just be an operative of some type perhaps a paid assassin.  How would you like him showing up at your door with your family there - while you are at work.  He may have.  Not buying his penciled story.  He is an admitted liar among other qualities.  He no doubt has his admirers and cohorts in various interests.  The one's he and his associates have not "mentioned".  Gullible reporting?  What's his military record?  I don't believe his story.  He is a bad character for sure.
[EX A]: Non-sexual-explicit

[EX Q]: Comment: Durango?!? I'm ambivalent about Amazon picking Denver but please don't destroy the smaller towns in the state. Durango would become unrecognizable if they were sucked into the Amazon orbit.
[EX A]: Non-sexual-explicit

[EX Q]: Comment: Oooh, oooh, oooh, get on board the hate train!  Post your comment against the elected President.  It's all good!  Obama was GOD!  That's why the Democrats keep losing seats in Federal posts and State Governments.
[EX A]:
Non-sexual-explicit