In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

[Q]: Comment: LOL. You are seriously citing a conspiracy kooks blog as proof.

Why not go to the king kook and link to Alex Jones.
[A]: Non-obscene


[Q]: Comment: If these pipelines are successfully blocked we could be seeing the beginning of the  end for confederation as we know it.  It is not as if those against pipelines are actually acting as if they are concerned about the environment. They still want al the advantages  of oil. The store shelves would be empty without oil.  Then there are those that go home and heat their homes and cook using the dirtiest fuel  called wood and or biomass.  ( it should be BioMESS)
[A]: Non-obscene


[Q]: Comment: Nothing like reading a recounted story by a bunch of meth heads.   "So I went to this guys place to look for my girlfriends ring that I was wearing on my pinky finger."   Why in the world would he think the ring happened to fall off his finger there, rather than anywhere else in Anchorage they happened to have been?  If anything is to be believed they left the ring as collateral for more meth, having run out of money, and then his girlfriend told him to get her damn ring back.
[A]:
Obscene