In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

[EX Q]: Sentence: Fred and Alice had very warm down coats, but they were not prepared for the cold in Alaska.
 Reason: The 'they' refers to fred and alice because the coats are what is not enough for the cold. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
[EX A]: Correct

[EX Q]: Sentence: Joe has sold his house and bought a new one a few miles away. He will be moving out of it on Thursday.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the old house because He will be moving out of it on   miles Thursday. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
[EX A]: Correct

[EX Q]: Sentence: The fish ate the worm. It was hungry.
 Reason: The 'It' refers to the fish because The fish was the one eating so it must be hungry. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
[EX A]:
Correct