We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Example Input: Just because the Chicago Tribune finds some "expert" in the field of arson investigation who examines paper evidence and says their may be cause for doubt does not mean that the man was innocent.
Example Output: Invalid

Example Input: Implementing the death penalty will send a message to others that no one should have the right to kill another person.
Example Output: Valid

Example Input: In the case where the intent and means to kill are present and no alternative presents itself, no.
Example Output:
Invalid