In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Example Input: Comment: Hogwash Gary - You cannot have your cake and eat it too. That is what I disrespect most about evolutionists, is the hypocrisy. If you are going to live by the sword, you must die by it. At least have the courage to admit and accept it. And why is sexual violence any more unacceptable that violence, the fact is you have no foundation as a Darwinist to condemn anything of this nature. If you are going to travel down this road, then you MUST defend animals we eat, and every other act of "violence" that imposes an outside will upon another being. I can discuss any topic rationally with any person, but hypocrisy is something I will not deal with.
Example Output: Non-sexual-explicit

Example Input: Comment: Oh, Gerson, you are fighting for your life as political insider.  You are nothing to Trump and would not have any ins.  You betray your party and throw in with Hillary rather than lose your insider status.  Very low Gerson, we need you out of politics and political commentary.
Example Output: Non-sexual-explicit

Example Input: Comment: The religion of peace strikes again!
Example Output:
Non-sexual-explicit