Categorize the comment on the basis of toxicity. If the comment is toxic (harmful, malicious, derogatory, threat, insult, identity attck, etc.) output Yes, otherwise output No.

[EX Q]: It was more than that Paul.  Vinis repeatedly attacked Clark's record.   And he did not offer any vigorous defense.   Nor did he go on the offensive and attack any of the numerous vulnerabilities that Vinis had.   Apparently he thought he could win this election being a gentleman, and refraining from criticizing Vinis.

However, elections don't work that way.   Attack campaigns do work!   That is why politicians use them so much.
[EX A]: No

[EX Q]: Go look outside at the Boeing 747 that just flew past.  Now take this quiz, ( pick A or B )

(A) Bill Nye worked on the Hydraulic Control system that keeps the plane in the air

(B) Sarah Palin is unable to understand how something that big stays in the air.

Darn the pesky science with all those numbers and facts!!!!!!!!
[EX A]: Yes

[EX Q]: He cleared the tree's so women couldn't be pulled in there and assaulted and so drug users couldn't hide in there using drugs.  By thinning tree's police could drive by and monitor the park.   Liberals fought him over this. Even gardeners vowed to boycott .  Liberals and tree hugger's felt a few trees and personal freedom mattered a hundred times more than public safety.  Had he sent the police in liberals would have protested that too.
[EX A]:
No