Categorize the comment on the basis of severe toxicity. If the comment is severely toxic output Yes, otherwise output No.

Q: Think of this situation: who bears responsibility for Lavoy Finecum being shot?  I am saying both the officers who shot him and LaVoy.   The officers for deciding to shoot and LaVoy for reaching for his pocket.   Here is another situation, you go to a biker bar and insult the meanest biker in the joint, do you bear responsibility for getting assaulted or worse? 
As far as the protestor is concerned, he chose to put himself in your "boxing ring", by creating a disturbance.  Now, should he have been attacked, no.  Again, I say he should not have been attacked.  However, if you are at a firing range and you step in front of a target, do not be surprised if you get shot.

A: No
****
Q: you gotta be kidding. i'm convinced you're pulling are leg. no body with half a brain would believe what you're saying.

A: No
****
Q: The part of 'Nurse Ratched' in this bad vaudeville act in Juneau is Cathy Giessel.  She is sooo cheeky that she insults the reporter. I reference that she didn't need to hear about Beltrami's comment from a reporter. My, My, MY! She is probably correct, her $120,000k Chief of Staff, let alone all the rest of the 'gossips' in Juneau no doubt already told her. remember her veracity is not of the highest caliber. So,
Go Vince, Go!!!

A:
No
****