We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

[EX Q]: There is no need to go crazy and ban guns, which would probably kill more than it saves, not to mention the infringement on our civil liberties.
[EX A]: Valid

[EX Q]: Why do people that want what they call reasonable limits on the right to bear arms demand laws that only law abiding citizens will obey?
[EX A]: Valid

[EX Q]: The point of the punishment line was to point out the attempt of the legislature to make it a crime to exercise your constitutional rights more frequently than they say you're allowed to.
[EX A]:
Valid