In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Ex Input:
Comment: "and more knowledgeable citizens"

Well you must not be a regular reader of the G&M. Just two days ago as part of the lead up to the Canada day celebration their was a fascinating piece here informing Canadians who hadn't heard that evidently Americans now think it's cool to be stupid. 
In the excitement leading up to a celebration somewhat similar to America's 4th of July, Canada's national newspaper ran on it's 'front page' , top center, that your only neighbors think it's cool to be stupid.

Ex Output:
Non-obscene


Ex Input:
Comment: But the book by that sore loser will leave you with a sore ass if you do that.

Ex Output:
Obscene


Ex Input:
Comment: Calling American Renaissance a white supremacist blog is intellectually dishonest.  That or you didn't actually read what their description was and just assumed because of hearsay. I was not familiar with them until now, but I actually researched the blog and found that, though they may not be in agreement with everything I think, they are asking tough questions and trying to decipher this wild use of identity politics that are rampant these days from actual race conversations, systemic racism. Just because a question isn't always easy to hear doesn't mean that you should shut down the arguments with cries of racism.

Ex Output:

Non-obscene