In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

[Q]: Comment: Black are pathetic garbage worldwide!  See Africa!
[A]: Identity-attack


[Q]: Comment: Oh, “BIGOTRY!”
Homosexual acts are sinful, and, according to Sacred Scripture, one of the four sins “crying to heaven for vengeance.”  A gay marriage is (un)naturally going to involve said acts.  Are you capable of comprehending this?  The baker doesn’t want to participate in a wedding that promotes this sin.  Now, a bigot is “a person who is obstinately or intolerantly devoted to his or her own opinions and prejudices; [you certainly fit that description to a tee] especially :one who regards or treats the members of a group (such as a racial or ethnic group) with hatred and intolerance.”
The question boils down to obstinacy and intolerance.  Well, when bases his opinion or belief of something as crystal clear as”homosexual behavior is sinful”, is it obstinacy or principled dissent?  And why do you think we should be tolerant of sin?  That certainly isn’t Christ-like, being as that Christ admonished everyone to “sin no more.”  You are the obstinate bigot here, clearly.
[A]: Identity-attack


[Q]: Comment: You are not only wrong, you are dead wrong and it is intentional and disgusting. I live in this neighborhood and it there is NO doubt where this fire started. These morons were lighting off fireworks late the night before and there are eyewitnesses of where the fire started. That they would even try to deny that they started the fire is a travesty.  If they get acquitted of this, this community needs to charge them civilly and destroy them financially. hell, even if they are found guilty they should bear the cost of fighting the fire, at least!
[A]:
Non-identity-attack