instruction:
In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.
question:
Comment: It would be delusional for the DNC to think they could recruit disaffected republicans without dropping the "white=racist" mantra.
answer:
Non-sexual-explicit


question:
Comment: 40,000 Boy Scouts creaming their head off, cheering for a pussy grabbing liar. And you're his biggest supporter on here.
answer:
Sexual-explicit


question:
Comment: Regarding: "Y'know, many of the Church Fathers like St. Jerome taught that when Christ was born, all peoples practicing homosexuality died to purify the world for the Incarnation. Lux orta est iusto."
- In light of Jerome's weird relationship with women, and his rants that their existence occasioned it does not seem odd that for Jerome, creation would be improved by the obliteration of those in the throes of gay sex.
- That is for Jerome, God's act of creation was not pure enough for the incarnation until women were dismissed  or controlled, marital sex was limited to those several times needed for procreation (at least an heir and spare), and men (gay or not) who had sex with men were disappeared.
answer:

Sexual-explicit