In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Example Input: Comment: Consider this analogy. Your daughter and her children are kidnapped by a notorious gang in Mississauga. A ransom is demanded. Does the government prohibit you from negotiating with that gang for the release of your family members? No, of course not. They'll eagerly handle the negotiations for you, or coach you every step of the way. 

You're not considered a criminal for negotiating with or paying a home-grown gang of thugs, even though such criminals pose a far greater risk to Canadians than some remote terrorist group. But should a raggedy group of militants in the mountains of Afghanistan get their hands on your family members, you are liable to a prison term of 14 years for negotiating with them and paying for your family's release.

The government's position is cruel and hypocritical. It's not a policy, it's an ideology. "We don't negotiate with terrorists!" Except, of course, when they do it to get government employees released.
Example Output: Non-obscene

Example Input: Comment: No, it's called reality. She looks horrible, although I would punch the back of her throat with my cock.
Example Output: Obscene

Example Input: Comment: Unfortunately you are the echo chamber of a Marxist media that is so well documented as to negate any need of spending time on. BLM, chanting "What to we want-dead cops, when do we want them- now", yes I'd classify that as a radical, and a bunch of Masked thugs beating up anyone they disagree with and stopping free speech on campus, again yes that would qualify in my book. My concern is that it doesn't for you.
Example Output:
Non-obscene