In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: threat and non-threat. Threat is a statement that someone will be hurt or harmed, especially if the person does not do something in particular.

Example Input: Comment: Trump qualifies as hyper-manic and a malignant narcissist. He lives his reality almost exclusively in the immediate moment.  It's why he can repeatedly tell his supporters that unlike Obama, he is going to take us out of Afghanistan and then turn right around and essentially follow the Obama course of action.  He can repeatedly scream in his rallies that Mexico will pay for his wall, and then castigate his own GOP Congressman for not putting tax payer funding for it in the debt ceiling bill.  I could cite more 'promises' that have been driven over by his bus of an ego, but my real question is why his supporters don't call him on any of his 'pivots'.  Then I remember the one place he hasn't pivoted is on his support for white male entitlement. But even with that one he's been so off the charts that even Playboy is now disowning their cover boy.  That has to be the prime indicator that Trump really is toxic crazy.
Example Output: Non-threat

Example Input: Comment: "Additionally, the report found that forests in Southeast Alaska will capture more carbon going forward, though it is only a small region of the state."

Why? How? 
"going forward?" Please, let's kill this nonsensical and completely redundant idiom now.
Example Output: Threat

Example Input: Comment: Eat fruit.  Do not drink fruit juice.  Fruit juice is bad for you.  

Sugar is completely unnecessary in our diets.  

Hopefully, sugar will be taxed and regulated in a near future, carbohydrate lobby be damned.
Example Output:
Non-threat