In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: toxic and non-toxic. Toxicity is defiend as anything that is rude, disrespectful, or unreasonable that would make someone want to leave a converation.

Example Input: Comment: Guest: "For 2 years running JD Powers has these same models"
.
That's funny. Not long ago, you described the problems per vehicles as "not worth mentioning". Why did you mention JD Power now?
Example Output: Non-toxic

Example Input: Comment: Recall everyone of them idiots who think the pfd is their answer to their screw-ups and shortfalls.
Example Output: Toxic

Example Input: Comment: Partly it is in Québec if Canada exists And also for the survival of the Québécois Nation (language, religion, civil code + ) was born the Canada of today...
without Québec, no Canada ! 
And without Québec, no American Revolution of 1775 !
True or false ?  Real!
In Canada, Québec is “officially” French speaking since 1774-
(but we all know that it is since his foundation in 1608) 
so why are YOU crying for then ?...Who’s LATE here ?...
and who’s got & MAKING a problem with it ?...
The past & present  Anglo Canadians are to blame here for not consciously recognize the "Québec Act"
(more to come)
Example Output:
Non-toxic