In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Input: Consider Input: Comment: And, finally:
.
"We'd be in uncharted territory, that is unarguable."
.
What nonsense.
.
The vast majority of democracies world-wide use PR.  Are you really suggesting Canadians are too dumb to figure it out?
.
Or are you merely suggesting that it only works in countries where the populations once worshipped Odin, Thor, and Freya?
.
Bring on Bugs Bunny, Elmer Fudd, and the Wagnerian opera ...

Output: Non-obscene


Input: Consider Input: Comment: Yes, your analysis is crap. Your first statement is apples and oranges. The Canadian soldiers don't have to sue to get their benefits (although Harper was headed that way). You haven't read the case so you have no clue what it was actually about. Finally, the "lefties" applaud getting the damn thing over with at a lower cost. Your problem was with the 3 previous governments, this part of things was inevitable. Harper (he did love losing at the Supeme Court)would likely have been stupid enough to fight it and triple the cost.

Output: Obscene


Input: Consider Input: Comment: The difference? Russiagate is a bipartisan investigation, while this desperate distraction is not. Hey, did you see the new Trump Halloween hats? Buy one now, dog-brains, and donate your hard-earned cash to the Donald J Trump legal defense fund!


Output: Non-obscene