The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.
--------
Question: Context: 'Hi! I am doing good.What about you?' 'Doing well, I'm exciting about my next camping trip with my family. ' 'Yeah that's fine.What you need the most?'
Utterance: 'I need food because I have mouths to feed and maybe a firewood?'

Answer: Yes


Question: Context: 'Food is also my highest priority, but firewood is also pretty close for me.' 'Would you be willing to take more firewood for less food?' 'Yes I think that sounds fair.'
Utterance: 'So if I take 2 foods and 1 firewood, you take 1 food and 2 firewood. What would be fair for water?'

Answer: No


Question: Context: 'My favorite thing to do around the campfire is to sing songs.  I also like to do extra hiking as well.  I especially need firewood. ' 'Well, I could see fit to give you the extra firewood (If I can hear a few of your songs!) if you don't mind letting me take the water.' 'Hahaha, once you hear my singing you might hope the opposite.  I can do that with the firewood and water, but I really would prefer two of the remaining foods. '
Utterance: 'I could also use the extra food, so can we resolve it amicably?  Coin flip maybe?'

Answer:
No