Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.

[EX Q]: You say: 
"Funny how ADN reporters fail to highlight things like the fact that after this ordeal, a Cordova Trooper paid for the victim’s 5 night hotel stay out of pocket (things like that are not unusual)..." 
but in the story it is stated that a trooper paid. 

See "According to Brandenburg, one of the troopers at the Cordova post covered a five-night hotel stay for him out of his own pocket."

What does what you write "...day before another ADN reporter’s headline about the shooting of a violent man with knives in his hands who rushed troopers after they try to talk him down, resulting in them shooting him to save themselves from being slashed is summarized by the headline “Troopers shoot and kill man on his birthday.” No bias there, right ADN?

got to do with the story about Christopher and why the heartache about the difference of the two above references?
[EX A]: Yes

[EX Q]: Take away their dayem cell phones while working for starters. Idiots. Start garnishing wages if they're that oblivious; that'll get their attention.
[EX A]: Yes

[EX Q]: Looks like the block busting efforts used by developers in New York to root out undesirable residents in favor of more affluent future residents - and make a killing on the real estate.  the issue about Rocky Street is about adverse possession, not about platted right of way.  This man Davis seems to be poorly informed, but willing to throw Seldovia into turmoil simply because he can. Borough planning regulations could, and probably should, be introduced and adopted to regulate this bad behavior in land development to favor the will of Seldovia and Borough residents.
[EX A]:
Yes