We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

Example Input: You somehow seem to think that getting rid of guns will stop people from killing each other.
Example Output: Valid

Example Input: The medium of 'free speech' has changed, but that does not affect that free speech should still exist - just as with the other constitutional points (with a few exceptions, if you believe Bush).
Example Output: Valid

Example Input: Since they've never done this it's only safe to assume that they hate absolutely any kind of gun and want them all banned outright without exception.
Example Output:
Valid