In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

[Q]: Comment: What the heck are you even talking about. The Constitution is the Supreme Court's job. To interpret it and uphold it, as written. Not come at it with some kind of activist perspective that Hillary thinks would be good policy. What was she right about?
[A]: Non-sexual-explicit


[Q]: Comment: I know you despise bigots, ToTL, you have often spoken against them. I know you are a Christian.

All I said is that Trump didn't speak against the Bigots initially. Then he backed off yesterday. Today, he blames everyone as though the bigots are the same as those who despise bigotry. All I said, and I think it is true, is that as president, Hillary Clinton would have had no problem telling white nationalist bigots, the KKK, and the American NAZIs to stand down. Trump won't do it, Hillary would have done it.
[A]: Non-sexual-explicit


[Q]: Comment: Corey you are just as irrelevant as your clueless leader when it comes to a coherent foreign policy objective.
[A]:
Non-sexual-explicit