In this task, you're given a statement, and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence clearly disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3' corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.

Example Input: Statement: Why, again?  Choices:  1. Tell me why? 2. Why now? 3. There must be a reason.
Example Output: 2

Example Input: Statement: This bill, however, is distinguishable because it limits specific representation and does not restrict lawyers in the manner of that representation. Choices:  1. The bill would severely limit specific representation.  2. The bill would not impact lawyers for representation. 3. The bill doesn't change anything for lawyers.
Example Output: 3

Example Input: Statement: Doyle's look at the audio-taping practices of 10 presidents is a valuable history and comparative survey (Ron Rosenbaum, the New York Times Book Review ). Doyle, a master of crackling prose (Richard R. Roberts, the Indianapolis Star ), provides insightful transcripts from key moments, such as the Cuban missile crisis and the final days of the Nixon administration. Choices:  1. Doyle has studied the audio-taping practices of 10 presidents and has previous transcripts of reporting jobs that provide insight into the Cuban missile crisis and final days of Nixon administration.  2. Doyle has a long history of solid reporting and correspondents coming after him review and use his work as a training tool for identifying how to write their own high quality reporting.  3. Doyle was a terrible and inept reporter who had no impact on history. 
Example Output:
3