In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

Q: Sentence: The large ball crashed right through the table because it was made of styrofoam.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the table because The one crashing is likely to be have made of styrofoam. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

A: Correct
****
Q: Sentence: The sack of potatoes had been placed below the bag of flour, so it had to be moved first.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the bag of flour because I believe that it would actually refer to the flour, because one would generally remove the item on top first.  Removing the object below might cause the item on top to fall. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

A: Correct
****
Q: Sentence: Sid explained his theory to Mark but he couldn't convince him.
 Reason: The 'he' refers to sid because Sid is the one doing the convincing, not Mark. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

A:
Correct
****