In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

Example Input: Comment: Another black racist raised on hate history.  Does she know that the first slave owner in america was a black plantation owner?  Also, a large percentage of slave owners were black.  Of you read “real” history you might know that.  Most slaves after being captured by black Africans and sold to white slave traders were sent to South America, Central America, and the islands in the Caribbean.  Approximately 2% were sent to North America.  Those are “facts”, not left wing progressive propaganda.
Example Output: Identity-attack

Example Input: Comment: Upon what evidence do you base your opinion that her response was "phony?"  Or that it was "outrage?"  The outrage that YOU are expressing shows an appalling lack of sensitivity on your part.  Why defend rudeness?
Example Output: Non-identity-attack

Example Input: Comment: maybe it was my use of the word imbeciles regarding this group of haters that was deemed unacceptable, but I'll say it again, CB, and see if you delete my comment a 2nd time re this article...

there are likely many in this bunch who would pack the 'closet' of secrets and hypocrisy.
Example Output:
Non-identity-attack