In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Input: Consider Input: Comment: Trump has no balls.   As with others he has criticized from a distance, he will be effusive in his (meaningless) praise for the pope when they meet in person.

Output: Sexual-explicit


Input: Consider Input: Comment: You know nothing about vegans or vegetarians, then you go and lump them into the SAME category as "food fetishists"!  Like those young men in the Book of Daniel, yes?

Output: Non-sexual-explicit


Input: Consider Input: Comment: You mean the anti-FA idiots or the supremacist idiots? Both are pretty stupid and dangerous. And there are plenty of each, though you're probably right - lots more anti-Fa idiots than supremacist idiots - latests estimate may be as high as several supremes, but millions of shrieking Lefty idiots. Yes.


Output: Non-sexual-explicit