In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

Q: Sentence: I put the butterfly wing on the table and it broke.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the butterfly wing because the wings are the main body of the butterfly, which is a very unusual shape. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

A: Wrong
****
Q: Sentence: Jane knocked on Susan's door, but there was no answer. She was disappointed.
 Reason: The 'She' refers to jane because of the way she was dressed - in black high heels and a black mini dress with the sleeves rolled. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

A: Wrong
****
Q: Sentence: There is a pillar between me and the stage, and I can't see it .
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the stage because the name of the stage is a pun or punny phrase, but the context of the phrase would. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

A:
Wrong
****