instruction:
The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.
question:
Context: 'Great idea, that works for me. 🙂' 'Okay, let's do that, and then split the food. Since there are only 3, do you want to flip a coin to see who gets 2 of those?' 'That sounds fair, how much food do you feel you need? '
Utterance: 'I would prefer 2 because it's really easy to underestimate how much I could need.'
answer:
No


question:
Context: 'Looking forward to this camping trip!  I am hoping we can find something amicable with these additional resources.' 'I'm excited too 🙂. Things have been stressful lately. What are some things that you value most?' 'It's supposed to be chilly where we are heading and I could really use some extra firewood.  🙂  What about you?'
Utterance: 'I really need food and firewood. Could you do 3 firewood and 3 food packages? My son has a problem with poor sugar levels which cause him to convulse when cold and doesn't eat enough food.'
answer:
Yes


question:
Context: 'im only require so much as im one person. you will double that' 'hey buddy I hope we both end up with a good deal🙂' 'i think its fair, do you, i think anything extra at this point in time is better than having nothing'
Utterance: 'look  mate, let me have 3 on food and 2 on firewood, you can have the water and i on firewood'
answer:

No