The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the no-need strategy, otherwise output No. no-need is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used when a participant points out that they do not need an item based on personal context such as suggesting that they have ample water to spare. no-need can directly benefit the opponent since it implies that the item is up for grabs.

Example Input: Context: 'Oh. Let do some deal. If you give me all water bottles I will give you 2 firewood. Can you accept this' 'i could give you 2 water bottles and 3 food if you can do 3 firewood' 'OK. Are you need Extra food packages?'
Utterance: 'no, I am okay with food which is why I offered them all to you since all my firewood is ruined. I figured if i gave you 2 water and 3 food you might be able to spare the 3 firewood'
Example Output: Yes

Example Input: Context: 'Hello 🙂What would you like to do with this deal?'
Utterance: 'My friend ended up having a medical emergency and couldn't go to the store when I asked her to get food. Because of that, I would like 3 food packages. I had to go help her with the medical forms and didn't have time to shop'
Example Output: No

Example Input: Context: 'if i give you all the food items, will you give me the firewood?' 'I was thinking maybe you can have 2 firewood and 3 waters. And I could take 1 firewood and 3 food?' 'that sounds fair'
Utterance: 'Okay sounds good to me, thank you! 🙂'
Example Output:
No