We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Ex Input:
Sent1: So should we be able to impose the sentence of life without parole, all the while understanding that we may have put an innocent man in prison for life?
 Sent2: Given the scrutiny of death penalty cases, it seems that we would be more likely to lock someone up for life in prison and never uncover their innocence than we are to execute an innocent person.

Ex Output:
Similar


Ex Input:
Sent1: i think the death penalty should be abolished because some people are sentenced to deathfor a crime they might have not committed.
 Sent2: Most people deranged enough to commit crimes worthy of the death penalty feel no remorse for what they have done.

Ex Output:
Not similar


Ex Input:
Sent1: Also, within the USA, murder rates are consistently lower in states that don't have capital punishment.
 Sent2: States without the death penalty have fared BETTER in reducing their murder rates than states with the death penalty.

Ex Output:

Similar