instruction:
In this task, you will be shown a sentence, and you should determine whether it is overruling or non-overruling. In law, an overruling sentence is a statement that nullifies a previous case decision as a precedent by a constitutionally valid statute or a decision by the same or higher ranking court which establishes a different rule on the point of law involved. Classify your answers into overruling or non-overruling
question:
however, we now specifically overrule the holdings in the case of city of kingfisher v. altizer, 13 okla. 121, 74 p. 107, and other cases of similar import of effect that plaintiff in an action for personal injury need not in any case submit to a physical examination.
answer:
overruling


question:
see, e.g., r.j. griffin & co. v. beach club ii homeowners ass'n, 384 f.3d 157, 160-61 (4th cir. 2004) (""in the context of arbitration, the doctrine [of equitable estoppel] applies when one party attempts 'to hold [another party] to the terms of [an] agreement' while simultaneously trying to avoid the agreement's arbitration clause.""
answer:
non-overruling


question:
the fact that plaintiff had present, albeit inconvenient, access to his land at the time of trial was of no effect in the evans decision, and insofar as curtman is inconsistent therewith, it must be overruled.
answer:

overruling