In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Example Input: Comment: Notice the DP isn't carrying the Donna Brazile story at all?  They do everything they can to keep the sheep in the blind.
Example Output: Non-obscene

Example Input: Comment: Hilarious.

All the Hilary supporters are now angry that Trump is implementing Hilary's policies.

Damned if he does and damned if he doesn't.
Example Output: Obscene

Example Input: Comment: Bannon doesn't like Traditionalist Catholicism because he is at all pious.  He has been divorced three times and I doubt that he attends Mass regularly.  He seems Traditional Catholicism as a means to an end because characters like Burke agree with him about the decline of the West and the dangers of non-white, non-Christians.  Traditionalist Catholicism is a perfect place to fish for converts to the alt-reich.  It is paranoid and inwardly focused, antisemitic, and conspiracy theory driven (see Fatima). It is interesting how easily the Vatican II hatin' set like Rorate Caeli and Father Z have taken to being shills for the alt-reich, Trump, and Russia.  

In fact religious fundamentalism of all stripes attract bigots because they cater to these people's hatred.  ISIS and the alt-reich are the same.  Both give the same dark message of hate and scapegoating to their mainly male followers who want someone to blame for all the problems in their lives.
Example Output:
Non-obscene