We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

[EX Q]: Sent1: Criminals don't care about gun bans, so a gun ban only takes guns out of the hands of law abiding citizens.
 Sent2: Something else you must keep in mind is that if we outlaw guns, the only people with guns will be outlaws, this leaves no defense for law abiding citizens.
[EX A]: Similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: The anti gun/gun control advocate way at dealing with deaths caused by guns is to limit the right to bear arms.
 Sent2: Talking about the right to bear arms with anti-gun/gun control advocates is like talking about civil rights with racist.
[EX A]: Not similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: The Second Amendment to the Constitution of the United States America states that, ���A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the People to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.�۝
 Sent2: Amendment militia preamble is no different: ���A well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state�۝���a state in which the citizen need not fear the ambitions of a would-be military tyrant at the head of a standing army.
[EX A]:
Similar