In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Comment: It's like the track. Go to one at the end of the day and you see people sitting, in shock, holding well-thumbed tickets that no matter how much they check and recheck them, are not giving them back their last $20. And now how to get home? Call their daughter and explain, again, how they were so close this time? A voluntary tax on the poor who pay for my fancy new hockey facility. Water on the bench! It's atrocious.
Non-sexual-explicit

Comment: Take out the illegal alien vote from Mexifornia and Trump handily won the popular vote as well.
Non-sexual-explicit

Comment: You are doing exactly what Nicholas Kristoff predicted, attempting to deflect this conversation from its proper subject, which is Donald Trump's connections to Russian corporations, government figures, and Russian money. Imagine that, Kristoof lays out the Republican strategy of deflection and deception, and you blindly repeat it.

Hillary Clinton and her party's stolen emails were thoroughly investigated by the FBI under James Comey. The salacious package of rumors put together by Christopher Steele have undoubtedly been examined by the FBI, CIA, and special counsel Mueller. Maybe Republicans can waste another couple Benghazi type years investigating Clinton, while voters still know who she is?

In the meantime, what bothers all you Republican Trump lovers is the mere fact of the investigation, which should have happened starting a year ago, given the rumors swirling around Trump. You elected a man about whom you really knew almost nothing. Only an  investigation can clear him.

Non-sexual-explicit