In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Ex Input:
Comment: Hi, ignoramus, love to see you in an alley way and
beat you with a louieville slugger. This will come 
to pas and whites will lose. Why, because they still
haven't even figured out which are men and which
are women. Terrible a race that can't even figure out
that born with a penis is male and a vagina is female.
Thank the Great one whites won't survive 50 more
years.

Ex Output:
Sexual-explicit


Ex Input:
Comment: Was she? She earned it and paid taxes...that's conservative. She said things that were worth hearing based on market forces...that conservative. She was one of the smartest leaders of the free world...that merit, that's conservative values. Wow, the devil in a pants suit for sure...too conservative for me.

Ex Output:
Non-sexual-explicit


Ex Input:
Comment: What could be the reasons for CI (Catholic Institution) clergies immobilized on the clergy child sex abuse scandals?  
1. over 99 percent clergies commit some form of sex abuse one time or another.
2. they know each other’s crimes.
3. they are some form of a clan and no one who betray on other clergies can survive?!
Is that mean Pope F. and C. O’malley also committed a sexual crime?  That could very well be the case!
If that is the case, we will have to do away with CI all together!
Over mother's (women) dead body clergies will continue clergy sex abuse of children!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Ex Output:

Sexual-explicit