In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.
--------
Question: Comment: A QUICK COURSE ON BUTT KISSING COULD HELP BECAUSE WHEN YOU GO TO THE TABLE EMPTY HANDED THE BIGGER GUY HAS THE STICK AND THAT GUY ISN'T JUSTINIAN IS IT ?

Answer: Sexual-explicit


Question: Comment: I am not assuming that she is lying or that she is telling the truth.  A photo shows a hand behind her it does not show it on her ass and it certainly doesn't show it on her bare ass... In fact it shows the opposite as the skirt would most definitely look different than it does if the back of it were being lifted AND he would have to be a freaking contortionist to touch a bare ass from that 'position' of his arm without lifting the skirt.  So I find Swifts claim of grabbing her 'bare ass' to be not only not credible but ludicrous.  And since 100% of the testimony wasn't that anyone else saw it but that Taylor Swift 'SAID' that it happened, well thats not enough evidence to do anything.  Now if she said that he grabbed her ass and not insisted that he grabbed her bare ass.. well then she has a more credible story at that point. IF that were the claim then I think she has at least a 50/50 chance of winning as it is she has 0.  Neither of these two deserve anything special.

Answer: Sexual-explicit


Question: Comment: The Globe continues to lose credibility on a daily basis. Southey washes over Berkeley "protesters" violently assaulting students peacefully gathering for a speaker who's opinions they disagree with (including pepper spraying a women being interviewed by media - the videos speak for themselves it was a pathetic display of violent cowardly lawlessness). Lighting buildings on fire and looting businesses is a legitimate because Southey disagrees with Milos views?  At least Southey is consistent in representing the ignorant bias of the hypocrite social justice warrior fringe. Right, there are no issues with political correctness in public discourse, just look at Rotherham or even the recent "event" in Sweden this past Monday.

Answer:
Non-sexual-explicit