The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the self-need strategy, otherwise output No. self-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to create a personal need for an item in the negotiation, such as by pointing out that the participant sweats a lot to show preference towards water packages.

[EX Q]: Context: 'Wish it was an easy car ride.  We're miles and miles from a store and it's getting dark.  I don't do well driving in the dark.  I think we might be getting close to agreement.  As I understand it:  you would get 1 water, 2 firewood and 2 food portions?  Is that correct?' 'Actually, I suggested that you would get 1 water, 1 firewood and 1 food portion.  I can compromise with you though.  I would like 2 water portions, 1 firewood and 1 food.' 'Since I arrived with no water at all, I would definitely need at least 2 waters.  I'm afraid I don't have a lot of "wiggle room" with that.  I'm open for the other supplies.  Ideally, I would like to have 2 waters, 1 firewood and 1 food portion.'
Utterance: 'If that's the case, I would like 1 water, 3 firewood and 3 food portions.'
[EX A]: No

[EX Q]: Context: 'That's fair, but I have wiggle room on the water, how about I take two food, two firewood and you take 3 water, 1 food, 1 firewood?' 'Is there anyway you will go with that I get two firewood? I need food the most but since you get most of that can I get most of the firewood? So 1 food, 2 firewood, and 2 water for me?' 'You drive a hard bargain. I could really use that firewood. It's going to get cold tonight and these sleeping bags are not worth the price I paid ;)'
Utterance: 'Haha, I know but I am in the same situation! ☹️ and since I am getting less food I feel like it is fair I get on more firewood since I truly need that 🙂'
[EX A]: No

[EX Q]: Context: 'Is there anyway you will go with that I get two firewood? I need food the most but since you get most of that can I get most of the firewood? So 1 food, 2 firewood, and 2 water for me?' 'You drive a hard bargain. I could really use that firewood. It's going to get cold tonight and these sleeping bags are not worth the price I paid ;)' 'Haha, I know but I am in the same situation! ☹️ and since I am getting less food I feel like it is fair I get on more firewood since I truly need that 🙂'
Utterance: 'Some extra water for coffee might keep us warm, would you consider taking 1 food, 2 wood, 1 water?'
[EX A]:
Yes