Given a paragraph about movies and a set of conversational questions and answers about the paragraph, say whether the passage contains sufficient information to answer the follow-up question. Say Yes if it is answerable; otherwise, say No. The paragraph has the prefix 'CONTEXT:'. Each conversation question has a prefix `Q:` followed by the answer prefix `A:`, and the follow-up question has a prefix `FOLLOWUP_Q:`.

CONTEXT: The opening title sequence with Superman is from "The New Batman/Superman Adventures" (TNBSA), and the classic Batman opening is from "Batman: The Animated Series" (BTAS). Episodes for "Batman: The Animated Series" have been broadcast and distributed under both BTAS and TNBSA titles. Other TNBSA episodes are sourced from "Superman: The Animated Series" and "The New Batman Adventures"; the final 24 episodes of BTAS, which used the animation style of the Superman show. Except for the opening title sequence, there is no observable difference between BTAS episodes sourced from either BTAS or TNBSA. The opening sequence used for your video stream depends on the release the episode was sourced from. Streaming companies (Amazon, Netflix, Hulu, etc.) license different video releases. If Amazon sourced a particular BTAS episode from a TNBSA release, then you will see the TNBSA opening. Since streaming providers usually provide only a single access point to a given video stream, assuming your provider has access to both releases, I do not believe there is a way you can control whether the source of your BTAS episode is BTAS or TNBSA.  <sep>  Q: Why do some of the Batman: Animated Series episodes feature the Batman-Superman opening? A: The opening title sequence with Superman is from "The New Batman/Superman Adventures" (TNBSA), and the classic Batman opening is from "Batman: The Animated Series" (BTAS  Q: Is there any difference in these episodes? A: Except for the opening title sequence, there is no observable difference between BTAS episodes sourced from either BTAS or TNBSA  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Have they been remastered or anything like that?
Yes

CONTEXT: I'd guess the movie's motive for not introducing the McKee subplot is because that was only a minor subplot of the book. And re-telling a book story in movie form, when you've got to get all the key details on screen in just 2 or 3 hours, means you have to omit many minor details. The core story of The Great Gatsby is about Gatsby and the world he lived in, not about Nick or Nick's potential attraction to Gatsby. In book form, there is plenty of room for the subplot suggestion that Nick is gay -- and the author Fitzgerald introduced the suggestion so subtly that most readers miss it. In the movie, however, throwing "Nick might be gay" at viewers along with everything else, in just 2 or 3 hours, could overwhelm them and/or distract from the core story -- and I'm not sure how it could be done as subtly on-screen as Fitzgerald pulled it off in the prose.  <sep>  Q: Why did the Great Gasby (2013) movie erase the hints of Nick Carraway's homosexuality? A: I'd guess the movie's motive for not introducing the McKee subplot is because that was only a minor subplot of the book  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Why would the writer include this subplot in the book?
Yes

CONTEXT: I think this means that she once again accepted Asgard as her home, is willing to fight for it and accepts Thor as her king (note that she also starts this line with "Your Majesty"), as opposed to how previously she was not interested in going back or helping Thor at all. The "You know what I mean" is probably because she's still a tough woman and did't want to get sentimental. The "Your Majesty" already used up her sentiment quota for the day.  <sep>  Q: What is the meaning of Scrapper 142's words to Thor?

Yes