In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

Q: Sentence: Thomson visited Cooper's grave in 1765. At that date he had been dead for five years.
 Reason: The 'he' refers to cooper because He visited Cooper's grave in 176. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

A: Wrong
****
Q: Sentence: Sam's drawing was hung just above Tina's and it did look much better with another one above it.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to tina's drawing because Tina's drawing was hung under sam's which made it look much better. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

A: Correct
****
Q: Sentence: The actress used to be named Terpsichore, but she changed it to Tina a  few years ago, because she figured it was easier to pronounce.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to tina because the name originally was pronounced Terpsichore in the US. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

A:
Wrong
****