The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.

Input: Consider Input: Context: 'Hi.  I am looking at possibly taking 3 of the food packages, 2 of the water packages and one of the firewood.  ' 'Hi. Why do you need so many food packages?'
Utterance: 'Well, I have two teenage boys who will be with me.  In normal circumstances they go through a lot of food.  While camping, hiking and kayaking I know we will need plenty to keep their energy level high to do everything.🙂'

Output: Yes


Input: Consider Input: Context: 'Yeah, sorry, that's not going to work out for me.  I'm going to need at least 2 bottles of water, 1 food packet, and one firewood.. again, this does leave you with two each on the food and the firewood, which are both very important things for this camping trip!' 'but thats the only offer im willing to give' 'Well then unfortunately I think we're gonna have to walk away from this and neither of us gets anything we could both use.. that's unfortunate and I'm sorry to see it end in such a less than magnanimous fashion ☹️'
Utterance: 'you need water and i need food so unless we do 1 food  to 1water is tht okay'

Output: No


Input: Consider Input: Context: 
Utterance: 'I want to make sure I'm well prepared for camping. How would you feel if I took 2 water, 1 firewood, and 2 food?'


Output: No