TASK DEFINITION: In this task, you will be presented with a context from an academic paper and a question separated with a 
. You have to answer the question based on the context.
PROBLEM: We evaluate our proposed model on a Twitter dataset obtained from the authors of BIBREF12. Our final dataset consists of 11,576 users (i.e, fact-checkers), 4,732 fact-checking URLs and 63,429 interactions. The dataset also contains each user's social network information. Note that each user's social relationship is restricted within available users in the dataset. 
 Question: What dataset is used?

SOLUTION: Twitter dataset obtained from the authors of BIBREF12

PROBLEM: The above pseudocode is agnostic with respect to the choice of fragmentation and environment functions; task-specific choices are described in more detail for each experiment below.

Discussion 
 Question: Which languages do they test on?

SOLUTION: Answer with content missing: (Applications section) We use Wikipedia articles
in five languages
(Kinyarwanda, Lao, Pashto, Tok Pisin, and a subset of English) as well as the Na dataset of Adams
et al. (2017).
Select:
Kinyarwanda, Lao, Pashto, Tok Pisin, and a subset of English

PROBLEM: The two popular segmentation methods are morpheme segmentation BIBREF4 and Byte Pair Encoding (BPE) BIBREF5. After word segmentation, we additionally add an specific symbol behind each separated subword unit, which aims to assist the NMT model to identify the morpheme boundaries and capture the semantic information effectively.  We utilize the Zemberek with a morphological disambiguation tool to segment the Turkish words into morpheme units, and utilize the morphology analysis tool BIBREF12 to segment the Uyghur words into morpheme units.  
 Question: How does the word segmentation method work?

SOLUTION:
morpheme segmentation BIBREF4 and Byte Pair Encoding (BPE) BIBREF5 Zemberek BIBREF12