We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Q: Sent1: So if we can assume that innocent people are convicted in capital punishment cases, shouldn't we be free to assume that innocent people are being convicted in non-capital punishment cases as well?
 Sent2: The fact is that as long as we have a death penalty (the only Western nation to have it), we will execute innocents with the guilty.

A: Not similar
****
Q: Sent1: But killing someone because of him killing someone is quite hypocritical.
 Sent2: If someone keeps killing and killing and killing, we need to stop him from taking lives.

A: Not similar
****
Q: Sent1: Actually, the idea that the death penalty costs more than lifetime imprisonment has been disproved many times.
 Sent2: The court time is not inevitable, otherwise there wouldn't be an argument as to the death penalty being more expensive than life imprisonment.

A:
Similar
****