In this task, you will be shown a passage. You need to write a fill-in-the-gap question based on your understanding of the events that might be inferred from the passage. Your question should be answerable based on the passage and only have one correct answer. Show the gap in your question with a _ .

Q: (CNN) As House Speaker Paul Ryan pulled the Republican health care bill from voting, I could almost hear the giant sigh of relief from Atlanta and across the nation's health care establishment. Hidden in the nooks and crannies of the American Health Care Act (AHCA) was a provision to eliminate $1 billion in disease prevention funds from the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Those cheers I imagine I hear right now in Atlanta are huzzahs from the CDC headquarters. According to the GOP plan, "Our Step-by-Step Approach," the first of three steps towards reshaping the American health care market was thwarted on Friday when the White House, recognizing that splits within the Republican Party could not be resolved to allow passage of the AHCA, instructed Ryan to pull the bill. Step two, led by Secretary Tom Price and his team at the Department of Health and Human Services, may still proceed: "going through every page of regulations and guidance related to the Affordable Care Act to determine whether or not they work for patients," with an eye to eliminating the rules laid out by the Obama administration.Laurie Garrett: The life expectancy of Americans is lower than those living in some third-world countriesThe GOP health care bill would have decreased it even more by cutting funding to life-saving preventative care, she writes

A: "As debate unfolded over ACA replacement millions of _ learned, apparently for the first time, that "Obamacare" and the "Affordable Care Act" are the same thing.
****
Q: (CNN) Republican leaders in the Virginia House of Delegates argue in legal motions that Democratic efforts to compel a circuit court to reconsider its decision allowing a questionable ballot to be recounted are frivolous and are delaying the organization of the new House for the coming legislative year. The decision forced the 94th District race between incumbent Republican David Yancey and Democrat challenger Shelly Simonds into a tie. That set the stage for a historic lot draw where the names of both candidates would be placed into film canisters and then drawn from a bowl, with the winner the first name drawn.Court's ruling forced the House of Delegates race into a tieThe election could be settled by drawing lots

A: If _ is declared the winner, the House would be split 50-50 between the parties and they would share power.
****
Q: The world’s leading authority on the detection of banned performance-enhancing drug EPO in blood says a particularly low level of the substance is explicable only by renal damage or doping — a conclusion that raises fresh doubts over historic alleged doping by a current staff member at Team Sky. As The Mail on Sunday reported last week, court documents in France show that an expert at a 2001 criminal trial concluded from a blood sample taken from a Dutch rider, Servais Knaven, that he had taken artificial EPO. The toxicology reports that led to testimony that Knaven had taken EPO were compiled by two doctors whose evidence was challenged in court, but the court ruled it was good evidence.The Mail on Sunday revealed French court documents show an expert at a 2001 criminal trial found Dutch rider, Servais Knaven, took artificial EPOKnaven has been held the role of ‘directeur sportif’ at Team Sky since 2011His employment comes in spite of Team Sky's 'zero tolerance' policyTeam Sky's unnamed experts exonerated Knaven of any wrongdoingEPO expert Robin Parisotto told the MoS: ‘The only known causes of such a low EPO level in blood [0.7] is either due to significant renal damage ... or the current and previous administration of recombinant [banned] EPO’Team Sky said the new medical opinion doesn't change their position on Knaven, who maintains his innocence and is a valued member of Team Sky

A:
No 3: A summary of an interview, quoting Knaven’s own words, following a police interview on 3 Dec 1998, signed by _ to show it is an authentic and accurate representation of what he had said in that interview.
****