We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

[EX Q]: The claimed that a gun shop owner was intentionally violating the laws of Chicago and selling all kinds of weapons to gang members, simply by being one mile outside of the Chicago city limits.
[EX A]: Valid

[EX Q]: Australia's laws mandating that all guns be kept locked up, and the lack of the ability to claim self-defense when shooting a violent home invader, has made Australia a very dangerous place to live or visit.
[EX A]: Valid

[EX Q]: This means that the people living in DC will soon be able to own Glocks and 1911s and Beretta 92s, as well as AK-47s and AR-15s and M1As and Mini-14s and all other kinds of modern weaponry.
[EX A]:
Valid