We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Ex Input:
it has been proven time and again prisons don't rehabilitate, keeping someone in prision for their entire life in prision is less human than the death penalty.

Ex Output:
Valid


Ex Input:
Some criminals never change, and via your testimony, only live to do it again.

Ex Output:
Valid


Ex Input:
Any deterent value that the death penalty brings to the table is simply a nice side effect.

Ex Output:

Valid