Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.

[EX Q]: I am INCENSED that Stephanie Dünx chose to write her "open letter" using the language of the patriarchal cismale colonist subjagators-- IN ENGLISH! 

Even now, her fellow protestors speak this vile tongue, and with every word I am reminded of British holocausts, wars, and various terror campaigns throughout the ages.

Oh! Wait ! I did it!

I did it again! Auuuugh!*

(Apologies to a certain comedy group from a country I dare not mention)
[EX A]: No

[EX Q]: The problem is that tens of millions of adult Americans work for less than a living wage.  I work in a production environment.  My job doesn't require a degree, but we have to do math, and we have to be focused.  There are no teenagers at my workplace.  Most of us are middle-aged, experienced people with a good work ethic.  When someone comes in who's not so bright, or has bad work habits, they get cycled out very quickly.  Yet most of us earn less than $12 per hour.  Our economy has devolved to the point where employers can have grownups for a teenager's wage.  It's nice for them, but not so good for the employees, or for society.

We could have a low teenage wage, or a low first 30-days on the job wage.  If it's really a job that requires no knowledge and no experience, then those employers will be okay with kids and high-turnover adults.  Employers who want grownups should pay a living wage.  A full-time worker should be able to rent an apartment.
[EX A]: No

[EX Q]: Smith, you do realize that you are talking to people who came here only to have a bowel movement and not learn anything?
[EX A]:
Yes