instruction:
In this task, you're given a statement, and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence clearly disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3' corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.
question:
Statement: Left to decide what part of the 1996 Act to strike as invalid, the court concluded that congressional intent regarding severability was unclear. Choices:  1. It was decided that the intent of severability was quite clear. 2. As a result, the court left the 1996 Act as it was originally written. 3. The court was able to decide which parts, if any, of the 1996 Act were invalid.
answer:
1


question:
Statement: It was applied pro bono by attorney Robert Hamrick at the Schwabe Williamson &amp Choices:  1. Attorney Robert Hamrick did not apply it pro bono. 2. Attorney Robert Hamrick was being charitable by doing it pro bono. 3. Attorney Robert Hamrick applied it pro bono.
answer:
1


question:
Statement: The original miniskirt had another revolutionary side--it was another theft by women from men, only disguised. Choices:  1. The original miniskirt belonged to men then women stole it. 2. Women had the original miniskirt first it was revolutionary. 3. Men wore the first miniskirts and now only women wear them.
answer:

2