In this task, you're given a paragraph and title from the research paper. Your task is to classify whether the given title is suitable or not for the research paper based on the given paragraph. Return "True" if title is proper according to paragraph else "False".

Example Input: Paragraph: Respiratory virus infection (RVI) in pediatric solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients poses a significant risk; however, the epidemiology and effects of an RVI after pediatric SOT in the era of current molecular diagnostic assays are unclear. Methods. A retrospective observational cohort of pediatric SOT recipients (January 2010 to June 2013) was assembled from 9 US pediatric transplant centers. Charts were reviewed for RVI events associated with hospitalization within 1 year after the transplant. An RVI diagnosis required respiratory symptoms and detection of a virus (ie, human rhinovirus/enterovirus, human metapneumovirus, influenza virus, parainfluenza virus, coronavirus, and/or respiratory syncytial virus). The incidence of RVI was calculated, and the association of baseline SOT factors with subsequent pulmonary complications and death was assessed. Results. Of 1096 pediatric SOT recipients (448 liver, 289 kidney, 251 heart, 66 lung, 42 intestine/multivisceral), 159 (14.5%) developed RVI associated with hospitalization within 12 months after their transplant. RVI occurred at the highest rates in intestine/ abdominal multivisceral (38%), thoracic (heart/lung) (18.6%), and liver (15.6%) transplant recipients and a lower rate in kidney (5.5%) transplant recipients. RVI was associated with younger median age at transplant (1.72 vs 7.89 years; P < .001) and among liver or kidney transplant recipients with the receipt of a deceased-donor graft compared to a living donor (P = .01). The all-cause and attributable case-fatality rates within 3 months of RVI onset were 4% and 0%, respectively. Multivariable logistic regression models revealed that age was independently associated with increased risk for a pulmonary complication (odds ratio, 1.24 [95% confidence interval, 1.02-1.51]) and that receipt of an intestine/multivisceral transplant was associated with increased risk of all-cause death (odds ratio, 24.54 [95% confidence interval, 1.69-327.96]). Conclusions. In this study, hospital-associated RVI was common in the first year after pediatric SOT and associated with younger age at transplant. All-cause death after RVI was rare, and no definitive attributable death occurred. 
 Title: A Multicenter Consortium to Define the Epidemiology and Outcomes of Pediatric Solid Organ Transplant Recipients With Inpatient Respiratory Virus Infection
Example Output: True

Example Input: Paragraph: The dynamics of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) transmissibility after symptom onset remains unknown. We conducted a prospective case-ascertained study on laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 cases and their contacts. Secondary clinical attack rate (considering symptomatic cases only) was analyzed for different exposure windows after symptom onset of index cases and for different exposure settings. Thirty-two confirmed patients were enrolled and 12 paired data (index-secondary cases) were identified among the 1,043 contacts. The secondary clinical attack rate was 0.9% (95% CI 0.5-1.7%). The attack rate was higher among those whose exposure to index cases started within five days of symptom onset (2.4%, 95% CI 1.1-4.5%) than those who were exposed later (zero case from 605 close contacts, 95% CI 0-0.61%). The attack rate was also higher among household contacts (13.6%, 95% CI 4.7-29.5%) and nonhousehold family contacts (8.5%, 95% CI 2.4-20.3%) than that in healthcare or other settings. The higher secondary clinical attack rate for contacts near symptom onset remained when the analysis was restricted to household and family contacts. There was a trend of increasing attack rate with the age of contacts (p for trend < 0.001). High transmissibility of COVID-19 near symptom onset suggests that finding and isolating symptomatic patients alone may not suffice to contain the epidemic, and more generalized social distancing measures are required. Rapid reduction of transmissibility over time implies that prolonged hospitalization of mild cases might not be necessary in large epidemics. 
 Title: High transmissibility of COVID-19 near symptom onset
Example Output: True

Example Input: Paragraph: New possibilities for the design of coronavirus vaccines have been opened up with the elucidation of the structure of the receptorbinding domain (RBD) of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) spike protein. The RBD of the SARS spike protein is responsible for virus attachment to its receptor, angiotensinconverting enzyme-2 (ACE2), on human cells. The RBD of the human epidemic strain differs from that of the animal virus by just two amino acids. Harrison and colleagues determined the complex of the interacting segments of these proteins, which consists of residues 19-615 of the peptidase domain of human ACE2 and residues 323-502 of the RBD, to 2.9-Å resolution. The ACE2 peptidase domain comprises two lobes that close during substrate binding, and the spike RBD contacts the tip of one lobe when ACE2 is either open or closed. The RBD has a five-stranded, antiparallel β-sheet core, and an extended-loop subdomain that lies along one edge of the core. A two-stranded β-sheet in this loop forms a concave surface that cradles the N-terminal helix of ACE2, and ridges along either side of the loop interact with structural features of ACE2. This loop (residues 424-494) was named the receptor-binding motif (RBM) and makes the only contacts with ACE2, producing a 1,700 Å 2 interface that is consistent with the high binding affinity of these proteins (K d ~10 -8 ). The detailed analysis of the contacts between these two proteins provides useful information for rational vaccine design. REFERENCE Li, F. et al. Structure of SARS coronavirus spike receptor-binding domain complexed with receptor. 
 Title: STRUCTURE WATCH Spikes point the way
Example Output:
False