Given a document, an entity and its sentiment towards the entity, verify if it is the correct sentiment towards the entity. Answer should be yes or no. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

[Q]: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Grassley is Neutral . ACORN's tax-exempt groups and allied organizations  long a target of conservative ire  used more than half their charitable and public money in 2006 to pay other ACORN affiliates  according to an analysis by the tax staff of Sen. Charles Grassley  R-Iowa.
 On Thursday  Grassley called the transactions a "big shell game" and said ACORN donors may be surprised by how the liberal group known for helping the poor obtain housing and health care was spending their money. He urged the Internal Revenue Service to take a closer look.
 According to the Grassley report  charities "are being used to raise monies which are then funneled to other charities or to other organizations for purposes other than what the donor may have intended. ... Dollars raised for charitable (purposes) appear to be used for impermissible lobbing and political activity."
 "Senator Grassley made up his mind  and he didn't bother about the facts " Lewis said in an interview. "He's dealing with a lot of outdated information and decided to frame it with a predetermined conclusion. Yes  we had problems under Wade Rathke. ... And we have been overhauling how we do things ever since."
 Also on Thursday  Grassley requested that ACORN  which stands for the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now  be taken off a list of approved charities for federal employees to donate to in an annual giving campaign.
[A]: no


[Q]: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Jonathan Swift is Negative . Jonathan Swift  we need you more than ever.
This week marks the 350th birthday of the brilliant Irish writer  born Nov. 30  1667. That we know of  Swift  at all is one of the sweetest fortunes of literary history.  His  father died of syphilis before Jonathan was born. A wet nurse whisked him to England for three years. He depended on the generosity of an uncle. He was almost killed by a mail bomb. But despite those precarious turns   Swift  became a poet  a priest  a political operator and  of course  the greatest satirist in the English language.
The longevity of  Swift ’s work is a testament to its potency because no genre fades as quickly: Satires are the cut flowers of literature. Time wilts their wit  fading their bright colors like old political cartoons that poke fun at fat cats we no longer recognize. (Voltaire adored Samuel Butler’s 1663 mock heroic poem “Hudibras ” but try reading it now without footnotes.)
[Jonathan Swift: Not (entirely) the misanthrope you thought you knew]
W.B. Yeats knew what he was talking about when he said of  Swift   “Imitate him if you dare.”
Consider the remarkable persistence of “A Modest Proposal ” published anonymously in 1729.  Swift ’s ironic phrase is such a hardy part of our language that it’s easy to forget how unlikely it is that we’d still be referring to a 3 000-word political pamphlet almost 300 years later. Originally titled “A Modest Proposal for Preventing the Children of Poor People From Being a Burden to Their Parents or Country  and for Making Them Beneficial to the Public ” the essay burns with rage at a privileged class willing to ignore and rationalize human suffering. Although the plight of starving Irishmen may be unimaginable to us today  the centuries have done nothing to mute  Swift ’s savage indignation.  He  still sounds as timely as last night’s “Daily Show.”
If you haven’t read “A Modest Proposal” since high school  look it up again and be astounded. Speaking in the voice of a perfectly reasonable bureaucrat   Swift  begins by describing the piteous state of beggars and their children “all in rags  and importuning every passenger for an alms.” In response to this “deplorable state ”  he  announces a solution  “having no other motive than the publick good of my country  by advancing our trade  providing for infants  relieving the poor  and giving some pleasure to the rich”:
Much of Swift’s essay is taken up with various statistics and logistical explanations  a hellacious spreadsheet of infant flesh to lay out the case for utilizing 100 000 children nursed to approximately 28 pounds each. In those well-modulated sentences   Swift  washes individuals and their pain away. As John Stubbs writes in his recent biography   Swift  possessed an “unequalled capacity to endow a ludicrous line of argument with an air of steadfast reason.” The bloody solution of “A Modest Proposal” is easy to laugh off as a bit of grotesque hyperbole  but the real horror of the essay remains its bland  bureaucratic tone — the same sterile language of accounting that justified American slavery  the Holocaust or any scheme that slices human lives into the columns of a ledger.
If politicians haven’t changed their menu much in 300 years  the rest of us still face the same risk of indigestion. Remember that “Gulliver’s Travels” ends with the intrepid narrator isolated and disgusted. Orwell assumed that Gulliver reflected his creator’s morose character and claimed that  Swift  suffered from a “general hatred of humanity” stoked by a perverse obsession with mankind’s sins and weaknesses. Stubbs argues that the image of  Swift  as a “misanthropic monster” is not entirely fair  but Gulliver’s fate is instructive  nonetheless.
Now that we’re all strident critics trading the day’s outrages across Twitter and the dining room table  how are we to avoid being sickened by our own bitter indignation? The bile in a satirist’s mind must be balanced with hope  or the whole enterprise is doomed. Surely   Swift  wouldn’t have bothered to poke fun at cruelty  incompetence and hypocrisy unless  he  believed  on some level  that such scalding exposure could awaken a better nature.
On  his  350th birthday  it’s good to remember that despair is the satirist’s temptation and the citizen’s poison.
[A]: no


[Q]: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Donald J. Trump is Negative . The top Leadership and Investigators of the FBI and the Justice Department have politicized the sacred investigative process in favor of Democrats and against Republicans - something which would have been unthinkable just a short time ago. Rank & File are great people! — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) February 2  2018
Speaking with reporters later   Trump  confirmed  he  had declassified the memo and again claimed political bias by investigative agencies. "I think it's a disgrace what's happening in  this country  "  Trump  said. "A lot of people should be ashamed of themselves  and much worse than that."
 Trump 's tweet came the same day as Republicans on the House Intelligence Committee are expected to release a classified GOP-authored memo alleging the FBI and Justice Department abused their surveillance authorities  a move  Trump  has apparently decided to clear over the objections from FBI director Christopher Wray and other intelligence officials.
The four-page memo  written at the direction of House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes  R-Calif.  has been reviewed by  Trump  and  his  aides  and the president has no problems with releasing it  said two administration officials  speaking on condition of anonymity to discuss internal deliberations.
Democrats said the memo omits other evidence – still classified – that allowed the government to secure the warrant on a  Trump  campaign foreign policy adviser and that  Trump  and Nunes are seeking to undermine the Russia investigation being conducted by Special Counsel Robert Mueller.
Critics also noted that  Trump  himself appointed the current leaders of the FBI and Justice Department.
According to some reports  the memo accuses Justice Department officials of obtaining a Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) warrant on an adviser to  Trump 's 2016 campaign by using an unverified dossier from a former British intelligence official.
 Trump  echoed that claim in a subsequent tweet  implicating Democratic opponent Hillary Clinton.
“You had Hillary Clinton and the Democratic Party try to hide the fact that they gave money to GPS Fusion to create a Dossier which was used by their allies in the Obama Administration to convince a Court misleadingly  by all accounts  to spy on the Trump Team.” Tom Fitton  JW — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) February 2  2018
The release also takes place as Mueller seeks to interview Trump as part of his investigation into any links between the  Trump  campaign and Russians who sought to influence the 2016 election via email hacks and fake news; the special counsel is also looking into whether  Trump  sought to obstruct justice during the investigation.
 Trump  has denied wrongdoing  and denounced the investigation as a witch hunt cooked up by Democrats.
Democrats said they are concerned they fear  Trump  could use the memo to fire Rosenstein  who appointed Mueller to his position  and to ultimately dismiss Mueller himself.
[A]:
no