In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: toxic and non-toxic. Toxicity is defiend as anything that is rude, disrespectful, or unreasonable that would make someone want to leave a converation.

Input: Consider Input: Comment: Really?

No question, the Chinese masterfully figure out how to copy and build cheaper. Rarely, if ever, better.

As for vested interests in fossil fuels, that is a complete red herring. In the US, fossil fuels are not revered, nor are they feared. Entrepreneurs like Elon Musk do not demand the neutering of Big Oil - he is convinced that he will beat them at their own game. In zero sum Canada, in order for one industry to prosper, another must be choked off by government.

The US understands that when a fuel source is found that beats oil and gas in terms of price, portability and energy density, then it is hasta la vista Big Oil. Until then however, all's fair.

Unlike in Canada where we persist in the fiction of thinking we are eco-laggards in  a world which is rapidly weaning itself off of oil, despite the fact of increasing, not decreasing global demand.

Our nanny state will see us getting poorer, with a few pats on the head from the eco-screamers to keep us warm.

Output: Non-toxic


Input: Consider Input: Comment: Exactamundo.

Output: Non-toxic


Input: Consider Input: Comment: I moved around growing up and was in southern and northern schools with diverse viewpoints.  The issue was more complex than just slavery.  However, any compromise acceptable to the south would have continued slavery.  Also, while the call for ending slavery was growing, there wasn't the political will to make it happen.  Lincoln wasn't planning on pushing for ending slavery.  The biggest slavery related issues revolved around new states admitted to the union.  The chance for any compromise ended when the south rebelled. The south is not only responsible for a civil war and huge death toll, they are responsible for the inability to compromise.

Really, the only moral defense they have is the question of whether or not a state should be able to withdraw from the country.


Output: Non-toxic