In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence can be inferred from the statement. Incorrect choices change the meaning in important ways or have details that are not mentioned in the statement. Indicate your answer as 1,2, or 3 corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.

[Q]: Statement: Participants raised questions about whether the SEC should reconsider the amount and targeting of its civil sanctions and more frequently use other types of remedies, such as criminal sanctions, to hold people accountable for wrongdoing. Choices:  1. Participants believe candles will be a great remedy for criminals. 2. Participants asked questions about different ways to hold criminals accountable for wrongdoing.  3. Participants asked many questions about the death penalty. 
[A]: 2


[Q]: Statement: That is, it had a much flatter income distribution, so that people had much more sense of sharing a common national lifestyle. Choices:  1. A much flatter income distribution for a common national lifestyle. 2. A much higher income distribution for a common national lifestyle. 3. The income distribution was a low as 20%.
[A]: 1


[Q]: Statement: yeah that was a bad a bad place to be especially right there on the water at night especially if it i mean if it were summer you're all right because it probably wasn't too cold but uh probably the worst one that ever happened to me was in when i lived in South Dakota Choices:  1. Swimming in the winter is pretty great. 2. The worst times are always in the winter. 3. It's not too bad being in the water when it's summer.
[A]:
3