We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Sent1: I have evidence that says that innocent people are convicted of crimes.
 Sent2: Many, many people have already been exonerated AFTER being convicted of a capital crime.
Similar

Sent1: In every state that retains the death penalty, jurors have the option of sentencing convicted capital murderers to life in prison without the possibility of parole.
 Sent2: Acutally, long ago, the executioner was a convict also sentenced to death.
Not similar

Sent1: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time.
 Sent2: That right to life was taken away, I agree, but we will not accomplish anything if we kill someone else.

Not similar