In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.

Input: Consider Input: Comment: Don't you think that the argument that ON, or Canada, or any jurisdiction for that matter, is too small to make a difference is a cop out?  If every jurisdiction thought that way, there would be no reason for any to act.  It's a classic Tragedy of the Commons situation.  The problem is a worldwide one, and everybody must be prepared to do their part.

My question to you would be: Do you believe that anthropogenic global climate change is a problem that needs to be addressed?  If so, how would you do it differently than this cap-and-trade system?

Output: Disagree


Input: Consider Input: Comment: We have a serious problem with scientific literacy in this country.

Output: Agree


Input: Consider Input: Comment: Just another of the liberal elites who considers the millions of ordinary citizens who voted for Trump as mere deplorables, their opinions too  coarse to consider.

Arrogance is their trait.

Its sickening to see this  continuing affront to ordinary citizens who are the movies main patrons..

Her movies will not be amongst my future picks.

I do haver taste..


Output: Disagree