Given a paragraph about movies and a set of conversational questions and answers about the paragraph, say whether the passage contains sufficient information to answer the follow-up question. Say Yes if it is answerable; otherwise, say No. The paragraph has the prefix 'CONTEXT:'. Each conversation question has a prefix `Q:` followed by the answer prefix `A:`, and the follow-up question has a prefix `FOLLOWUP_Q:`.

Input: Consider Input: CONTEXT: You're probably after Pomysłowy Dobromir from the 70s, a dialogue-free Polish cartoon about a boy who lives with his grandfather and a pet bird and always comes up with inventions. I think the episode you're describing is this one, only it's a hand pump, not a faucet:  <sep>  Q: Russian/East-European/Soviet Cartoon show with 3 main characters A: Pomysłowy Dobromir  Q: I used to watch it in 1984. The show is in color. no dialogue, only music and sound effects A: Pomysłowy Dobromir from the 70s  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: The characters are: a boy, his grandfather and a bird. And both the boy and his grandfather live in a house with no other member of the family.

Output: Yes


Input: Consider Input: CONTEXT: My guess is that it was relevant only at that particular moment. It was an expression of humans' attitude towards Clark. Just like criminals who are not accepted as 'normal' members of a society and stay behind bars in prisons or lines in this particular case, and treated differently from the rest of the society, Clark was also a stranger, an alien whose intentions or nature wasn't fully understood, so seeing 'behind the line' phrase behind Clark bears that symbolism in my opinion. So you can guess that he would be handed over to Zod. Also note - if we continue our analogy with criminals - that he hasn't been tried/appeared before a judge yet. People see him later in action, and he is judged by his actions, and afterwards accepted as an ally i.e. acquitted. And the reason it was painted over maybe because the rest of the phrase was irrelevant, and also if it said detainees - he is not really a detainee, wasn't detained, he surrendered. Or maybe because they couldn't really detain him, he ripped handcuffs off with ease.  <sep>  Q: What is the full phrase painted over on the ground and its purpose? A: My guess is that it was relevant only at that particular moment  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: What do you think the full phrase is?

Output: Yes


Input: Consider Input: CONTEXT: Luke had discovered that his father was a Jedi and that he had some skill with the force from his time with Obi-Wan. He was advised by Ghost Obi-Wan to seek out Yoda to further his training. So he seeks out Yoda for training. Leia on the other hand does not know of her parentage, had not experimented with any Force training and had no time with Obi-Wan at all. She does not even really understand the Force, never mind seeking out a master for her training. I think it is also clear that Leia is not as inherently strong with the force as Luke. Vader has her in captivity, even tortures her and doesn't seem to sense her latent abilities. Luke, despite very brief training on the flight to Alderaan, is quickly identified by Vader as being strong, even when he is just another pilot in the battle over the Death Star. I think Yoda and Obi-Wan view Leia as a backup, to be used if Luke failed, and that to keep her parentage secret from her, Vader and the Emperor was the best way to keep her safe.  <sep>  Q: Why didn't Yoda train Princess Leia as a Jedi? A: Leia on the other hand does not know of her parentage  Q: Didn't he say that the force was strong with her as well? A: I think it is also clear that Leia is not as inherently strong with the force as Luke  Q: Why is it not as strong with her? A: Vader has her in captivity, even tortures he  Q: Is there an importance to it? A: I think Yoda and Obi-Wan view Leia as a backup, to be used if Luke failed  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: So, they will use her as backup but she isn't good enough otherwise?


Output: Yes