We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

Example Input: They didn't shoot someone because they were criminals, they because criminals because they shot someone, Your point boils down to 'Laws do not work because people disobey them-we should have no laws'.
Example Output: Valid

Example Input: A law-abiding gun nut who uses their gun in committing a crime, is a criminal, and not law-abiding.
Example Output: Valid

Example Input: Gun owners don't drive into crowds of people simply because they had a gun in their car.
Example Output:
Valid