TASK DEFINITION: In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine the neutral choice based on your inference from the statement and your commonsense knowledge. The neutral choice is a sentence that neither agrees nor disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3', corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence. If sentence X agrees with sentence Y, one's correctness follows from the other one. If sentence X disagrees with sentence Y, they can not be correct at the same time.
PROBLEM: Statement: The bad  Lots of people might be killed in the process. Choices: 1. The worst thing is that we might be the ones to die, too. 2. Lots of people might be killed in the process - that's the bad thing. 3. There is nothing bad about this, it has only good sides.

SOLUTION: 1

PROBLEM: Statement: Such an approach invariably leads to added costs because programs are forced to fix problems late in development. Choices: 1. Approaches like that usually lead to added costs. 2. That's the safest approach possible in terms of avoiding unexpected costs. 3. Problems late in development are always guaranteed to happen.

SOLUTION: 3

PROBLEM: Statement: Brownell also said a partnership with the Solano County Bar Association should help get the word out to attorneys who might want to donate their time. Choices: 1. Brownell had found that finding lawyers who had that type of time was more challenging than expected. 2. The Solano County Bar Association could help with finding lawyers who would be willing to donate their time. 3. The Solano County Bar Association would be unable to help with finding lawyers who would be willing to donate their time.

SOLUTION:
1