We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Ex Input:
When someone mentions a criminal deterrence factor with death sentences, it sounds like a bad joke or total ignorance.

Ex Output:
Valid


Ex Input:
So I have a solution, how would you feel about a convicted rapist being casterated along with his prison sentence, then upon release he is not likely to repeat the crime.

Ex Output:
Valid


Ex Input:
The death penalty is sometimes claimed to save lives through deterrence.

Ex Output:

Valid