Given a document, an entity and its sentiment towards the entity, verify if it is the correct sentiment towards the entity. Answer should be yes or no. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

Input: Consider Input: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Natalie Prass is Neutral . Songs We Love: Natalie Prass  ' Short Court Style'
Natalie Prass  corkscrewed some solid Americana roots with  her  self-titled debut back in 2015  building off chops from touring with Jenny Lewis and  of course  the twangy pedigree booking time Nashville inherently affords. "Short Court Style " her first single from the forthcoming The Future and The Past  captures a move deeper than her literal one to Richmond  Va. Seeped in sugary  white-sand synth and jazzy guitar grooves that nod to the late '70s  the track sets sail in a new direction for  Prass .
The throwback feel  Prass  conjures on the song isn't what's new. (She nailed Dusty Springfield-style soul three years ago.) This go   Prass  blends ornate sentimentalism with practical wisdom. Layered  lush vocals overflow a chalice like a cascade of grace opening the song. It's contemplation beneath the guise of a starry  velvet cape; one that can obscure the torturous back-and-forth of a boomerang relationship.
Although  Prass  owns up to the ambivalence of the situation   she  remains optimistic with an after-dark  coconut rum-soaked carousel chorus: "You spin me round / Round and round / And ups and downs / Knowing I can't be without / My love that I have found." The video's merry-go-round lends a natural visual  spinning as  Prass  holds on tight and smiles. It isn't yacht rock  but there's an undeniably glitzy  nautical component.
"Short Court Style" is a departure that  given the critic sweetheart status of Natalie Prass  could be seen as a risk. However  here we find  Prass  shedding Disney princess comparisons and instead gloving up to pole-vault across soft sands with The Future and The Past.

Output: no


Input: Consider Input: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Smiths is Neutral . The Smiths disgust mounted when  after repeated demands  Toyota finally responded and appeared to suggest the owners of the vehicle were at fault.
"When we finally forced Toyota to respond in writing  we received a five- sentence analysis stating  and I quote  'When properly maintained  the brakes will always over-ride the accelerator.'
"Well  we know that's a lie  and we were outraged that Toyota would suggest in that statement also that the brakes have to not properly be maintained in order for that to happen and the car had less than 3 000 miles on it."
Smith said they took their complaint to the National Center for Dispute Settlement but described the proceedings as a "total farce."
The local field technician for Lexus participated in the hearing by speakerphone despite being based only an hour away  and testified that Smith had "caused this problem by standing on the brakes while spinning the tires."
"Well  of course  we were furious that Toyota called us liars a second time " Smith said.
Undeterred  the Smiths took their case to the federal National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA).
But although the agency sent investigators to probe the circumstances of the incident  the SmithsSmiths said neither NHTSA nor Toyota took their case seriously. Eventually  and reluctantly  they gave up their case in 2008.

Output: no


Input: Consider Input: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity CHRIS WALLACE is Negative . CHRIS WALLACE  " FOX NEWS SUNDAY" HOST: I'm  Chris Wallace .
 WALLACE : Partisan finger-pointing and uncertainty after a standoff in the Senate over immigration. We'll discuss the fallout for Americans and who will get the blame with White House Budget Director Mick Mulvaney and Democratic Senator Chris Coons  part of a bipartisan group trying to work out a compromise.
 WALLACE : We'll ask our Sunday panel about the Trump presidency one year after his inauguration.
 WALLACE : All right now on "Fox News Sunday."
 WALLACE : Not good if they are arguing over posters.
 WALLACE : Describe the extent of the shutdown both in terms of personnel and programs.
 WALLACE : You are calling this -- we heard it  saw it in the open  the Schumer shutdown. But the fact is you only have 46 Republicans willing to vote for this congressional  this continuing resolution. So  even if there hadn't been a Democratic filibuster  you didn't have the majority needed to pass the C.R. All the more reason  isn't this on Republicans and the White House and control of the House and the Senate?
 WALLACE : It's not just because of Democrats.
 WALLACE : The point is  you do not have your own house in order. You only have 46 Republicans supporting this.
 WALLACE : But you only had 46 Republicans.
 WALLACE : Well  you don't have 46 Republicans either. I mean  you don't have 51 Republicans either.
 WALLACE : Back in 2013  when Republicans insisted on shutting down the government because they wanted to remove all funding of ObamaCare and they did it for 16 days  private citizen Trump placed the responsibility squarely. Here he is.
 WALLACE : But why doesn't he -- I mean  he didn't have a meeting  a bipartisan meeting with congressional meetings yesterday. Does he have one on the schedule for today?
 WALLACE : You blame Democrats for holding the government hostage now  but back in 2013  you supported holding the government hostage on this question of ObamaCare. Take a look.
 CHRIS WALLACE   FOX NEWS HOST: Why was that legitimate then  the right reason to have a fight  but it's not legitimate now?
 WALLACE : I wasn't saying a word.


Output: no