We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

Example Input: The medium of 'free speech' has changed, but that does not affect that free speech should still exist - just as with the other constitutional points (with a few exceptions, if you believe Bush).
Example Output: Valid

Example Input: But guns aren't likely to do anything whatsoever, any more than cars are likely to drive or hammers are likely to strike.
Example Output: Valid

Example Input: Well, owning handguns for personal home protection is different that carrying guns in a concealed fashion for protection.
Example Output:
Valid