In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

Q: Comment: Trump's approach on DACA is unconscionable because he is so concerned to preserve some face that he’s willing to leave all the Dreamers hanging in a suspended state, with all the fear and anxiety that creates for them and their friends and loved ones. 











Even if he’s committed to doing the right thing in the end, he’s going about it in such an awful and immoral way that he can’t be given much credit for it.

A: Non-identity-attack
****
Q: Comment: I would be carrying more than a large knife if people were shooting at my home and animals, calling me a white nigger, threatening to shoot me, and showing up with a virtual lynch mob of ignorant people who are shouting and threatening to 'tape me up' and send me out of town. The leaders of Akiak have led their people to commit illegal actions before and what would stop them if they told these people to harm this man? I understand that kind of harassment is legal and accepted in Alaskan native villages apparently, but it's not right on a human or a Christian level ( which is apparently not their religion). Sooo he is  wearing a knife on his belt on a small farm in Alaska and that makes him a bad person? Hahaha. That's beautiful.

A: Identity-attack
****
Q: Comment: It's not everyone who thinks like that, but I can guarantee you that this exact line of thinking exists among a surprising number of people in the Republican caucus. "Freedom Caucus". 

Grover Norquist made one of the most powerful lobbying groups in DC on that exact premise. He claimed: "My goal is to cut government in half in twenty-five years, to get it down to the size where we can drown it in the bathtub." 

It's a pretty easy lie to make: Cut taxes (who doesn't love tax cuts?!), then complain that we can't afford to fund programs the cuts paid for. Wash, rinse, repeat until that baby is dead in the tub. Anyone wanting to argue that this isn't beyond the pale - look at how Trump is deliberately sabotaging Obamacare, messing with peoples lives, just so he can slap his name on some kind of replacement. Is that any less irresponsible?

A:
Non-identity-attack
****