In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

[EX Q]: Comment: impeach the greedy liar already
[EX A]: Non-obscene

[EX Q]: Comment: Who gives a darn about the so called three founding nations. There is blatant bigotry and hypocrisy when that term "founding nations" is used as a smoke screen for racism. My family has been here for well over two hundred years. Does that give me license to discriminate against others? No!  If ratepayer’s referendums were the standard for zoning changes, NIMBYs would stop 90 of all development. In this case the referendum was invoked, because of local resistance (code word for racism) to the development. The referendum was used by weak politicians for cover.
[EX A]: Obscene

[EX Q]: Comment: Statistics are usually used to prove/disprove arguments.  "Liars, damned liars and statisticians" is the common quote.

I have made no such argument of statistical relevance on this issue.  

Springfield has produced the last two convicted sexual offending educators in the local area.  That is a statistic.  

Enjoy!
[EX A]:
Obscene