In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Ex Input:
Comment: If the Democrats had any brains they would never "block" a Supreme Court nominee just based on ideology.  If they are not qualified that is one thing but if they are not a left winger that is nonsense.  Maybe the Republicans should then block any leftie from the court who is otherwise qualified.  This kind of stuff is what ruins our entire system and makes people not trust it at all.  We want good judges who are not buried in ideology but can rule on the facts and the law.  How hard is that?  Often, it is much easier than checking a potential ruling against a certain ideology.  Try it!

Ex Output:
Non-sexual-explicit


Ex Input:
Comment: Don't worry Nana-Kool-Aid. Your cherished "pharma bro" equivalent, Mr "choo-choo bro" pimp daddy Caddy is already draining the Kool-Aid laden swamp in Nanakuli. When you get that new 5,000% property tax bill increase you might end up on Magic Island yourself!

Ex Output:
Non-sexual-explicit


Ex Input:
Comment: trump has not abused any power loser,, he is running within the constitution,,, now obama on the other hand tried over and over to go around the law

Ex Output:

Non-sexual-explicit