In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

Example Input: Sentence: I can't cut that tree down with that axe; it is too small.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the axe because of the axe's size. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Example Output: Correct

Example Input: Sentence: The painting in Mark's living room shows an oak tree. It is to the right of the bookcase.
 Reason: The 'It' refers to the painting because The sentence describes the painting, so you assume the oak tree is next to a house. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Example Output: Wrong

Example Input: Sentence: I saw Jim yelling at some guy in a military uniform with a huge red  beard. I don't know who he was, but he looked very unhappy.
 Reason: The 'he' refers to the guy in uniform because it is a common practice at military bases to have a guy in a uniform shout at people. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Example Output:
Wrong