In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: threat and non-threat. Threat is a statement that someone will be hurt or harmed, especially if the person does not do something in particular.
--------
Question: Comment: So, the much vaunted TRUMPCARE has now become the DUMPCARE.

That's one for Obama :)

Answer: Non-threat


Question: Comment: Mocking religion is a western right. But yes the hypocrisy from liberals always assaults the intellect of average Canadians.
I'm only allowed to mock certain religions under Justins M-103, because some religions are more important then others.

Answer: Non-threat


Question: Comment: That was great AP. 
Someone above writes: "Perhaps we can start by ceasing to call those with whom we disagree "trolls"?" 
Most know that the allegation is false, the source questionable and that the identification is merited.
When I think of "troll", I actually think of "trawl". I recall hand line jigging for cod contrasted with the sight of "trawlers" devastating the stock of the species and in the process destroying the environment that made it sustainable by knowingly dragging their nets on the bottom.
A scan of posts where virtually EVERY post that envisages a compassionate Christ in Pope, in church, in community is "trolled", subject to "disagreement". Posts are bottom "trawled" in  attempt to demean, derail, divert, drag down from value and subject. Except, of course, those of their own which espouse an ideology, that makes a mockery of the notion of "right" and "conservative".
 I agree to cease using the term "troll", but "trawler" and trawling seem apt.

Answer:
Non-threat