We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

[EX Q]: Sent1: Because we are all potential victims of violent crime, and I believe that there are violent crimes deserving of the death penalty.
 Sent2: I firmly believe that some crimes and criminals are deserving of death.
[EX A]: Similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: And that killer has help, he has the people that support the death penalty and will give him more appeals, and if found guilty he'll get an easy way out with death, he won't have to suffer.
 Sent2: If we have a death penalty statute on the books, a person is convicted under that statute, his ONE appeal fails...he should die.
[EX A]: Not similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: So what does he have to do with a debate like this about murderers and the death penalty?
 Sent2: Ask the family members of who he killed if he deserves death.
[EX A]:
Not similar