In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

[EX Q]: Sentence: Frank was upset with Tom because the toaster he had bought from him didn't work.
 Reason: The 'he' refers to frank because toaster likely to upset. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
[EX A]: Wrong

[EX Q]: Sentence: Grace was happy to trade me her sweater for my jacket. She thinks it looks dowdy on her.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the sweater because grace was happy to trade me thinks  looks dowdy on her. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
[EX A]: Correct

[EX Q]: Sentence: Thomson visited Cooper's grave in 1765. At that date he had been dead for five years.
 Reason: The 'he' refers to cooper because he was buried with his wife, Mary, by the same Presbyterian minister who had baptized her. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
[EX A]:
Wrong