The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the self-need strategy, otherwise output No. self-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to create a personal need for an item in the negotiation, such as by pointing out that the participant sweats a lot to show preference towards water packages.

[Q]: Context: 'Hello, how are you doing today?' 'Very good. How about you?'
Utterance: 'I'm doing well. I'm looking forward to going on my camping trip but will need some additional items to make sure the trip is safe, healthy, and enjoyable. '
[A]: No


[Q]: Context: 'i really need water and food. we did not get enough of those.' 'Those are my priorities as well, how about you get all the food and two firewoods, and i get all the water and one firewood, does that sound fair?' 'i would prefer water instead of food if possible, but i am sure we can work it out.'
Utterance: 'water is really important for me, how about i get two waters and three firewoods and you get three foods and one water?'
[A]: Yes


[Q]: Context: 'I apologize but that will not work. I have a diabetic and need to make sure they will have enough food for a hike. So I would like to take two food packages, one water, and two firewood. ' 'That won't work. Because, we are planning for a campfire. And so, we are in need of fire wood. I hope you understand.🙂🙂🙂' 'I understand. We are also planning a campfire, and have a lot of young kids who will need the fire to stay warm. So that's why I feel I need two firewoods. 🙂'
Utterance: 'Sorry for apologize. Here we are having old aged people here. I need two packages of food. Otherwise two of firewood.🙂'
[A]:
No