We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

[Q]: Stanford did an experiment on prison rehabilitation and psychology, and had an extremely interesting outcome.
[A]: Valid


[Q]: Because they love to butt-fuck and they're usually pro-capitol punishment.
[A]: Valid


[Q]: Do you get that there was no crime that he could have repeated, because he didn't commit one in the first place?emoticonXAngry
[A]:
Invalid