Categorize the comment on the basis of obscenity. If the comment is obscene output Yes, otherwise output No.

[Q]: Alaska needs to find a way to get more companies drilling and stop the harshness of the state oil and gas agencies that have run smaller competitors out in favor of the majors! 

Now the majors have laid off so many Alaskans maybe the state will stop running the smaller companies out with bad rulings! Alaska will need oil jobs and more oil fast! 

Look at the UK; http://www.rigzone.com/news/
[A]: No


[Q]: Agreed.  If you look outside of the giant investor-bought buildings where they kick everyone out to make more money to satisfy large monied interests, almost all other "no-cause" evictions from smaller and independent landlords will have some good reason behind them, whether it is a problematic tenant (as described in one of the other stories from this article), family moving into the unit, wanting to renovate the property, etc.

If a tenant is a good tenant, that's worth a hell of a lot more than a small rent increase to keep them around.  If the tenant is paying only 50% or 60% of the market rent, well, do we ask any other business or property owner to consistently provide their goods and services at a 40-50% discount for all time?  No.
[A]: No


[Q]: Yes, that is the review process we go through to comment. The three comments we see are determined by random chance, not by topic, author of the comment, or social psychology. The idea is you take a step back, look at some other random comment in another thread (with a click available to catch context), and rate that one as civil, or not. 

I don't know about social engineering, that may be a bit too grandiose. I think of it as all of us pitching in to moderate, instead of depending on one person, or some software to screen words and phrases. We each spend our 10 second, and the system works better. I hope.
[A]:
No