In this task, you are given product reviews about dvds. The goal is to classify the review as "POS" if the overall sentiment of the review is positive(the reviewer is satisfied) or as "NEG" if the overall sentiment of the review is negative(the reviewer is not satisfied).

[EX Q]: It just never gathers steam. . Sure, it's steamy, and the leads are sexy, but we never really get a chance to know or care about them, so their bad choices and struggle to get together just never seems to matter.    In fact it was a little boring.  Plus, what language are these folks speaking?  I know it's English, but it might as well be French.    The supporting cast is universally nasty, selfish, uninteresting, and unlovable.      Not much to like here.  Avoid this unless you have a thing for bloody fights, of which there are a couple
[EX A]: NEG

[EX Q]: TERI HATCHER NAKED? BIG DEAL - WHERE'S THE CURVES? . She's built like a 12-year-old boy... give me Vida Guerra anyday
[EX A]: NEG

[EX Q]: *Yawn* . I bought this DVD because it features Alan Rickman. I also purchased it because of someone else's Amazon review (They sounded like they really knew what they were talking about). I am glad I bought it used, because if it were new, I would feel that I'd been cheated.    The movie was about as suspenseful as waiting in the doctor's office. There was no sense of suspense, and I was about as thrilled and chilled as a lukewarm cup of tea (Mind you, I'm NOT the type who requires non-stop action and special effects to be happy).    The dialogue throughout was tedious and trite; the scriptwriter should be on the unemployment line, as well as the director and the editor.    The plot was, in some respects, totally illogical, and at other times nonsensical. Even previous scenes don't tie in neatly enough at the end. The plot is entirely unconvincing and implausible. The choices the characters make - whether restless, bored, frustrated - don't tie in the the normal patterns of logic and suck all realism away from the film (Like a greedy, unwashed vampire).    The movie features a wealthy, bored couple. I was also bored. But I'm not wealthy.    However! All the actors did their best within the limitations of this film. Polly Walker was very convincing as a sensitive, but hypercritical wife. In fact, I'd say she provided the best performance, and her character was the most three-dimensional and human. They should have provided more time to make the audience more sympathetic to her character.     Norman Reedus was fairly genuine as the young man, although he seemed more creepy and psychotic than attractive. He failed to grab my empathy. Which makes the plot of the movie more implausible ... that a jaded, wealthy couple would have allowed him into their environment.    Alan Rickman did his usual subtle work, but it was so subtle that I thought they might have not let him have his morning coffee before filming. His attempt at an American accent did not fly too well. Later in the movie, however, he becomes much more interesting.     The end lacked passion and was not surprising at all; it was entirely predictable.    For Rickmanistas, yes, you get to see Alan naked. So, just fast forward to the end of the movie and you will be happy.    I have always admired Alan Rickman - I'm a big fan - but he would have been better in a more skillfully scripted & directed film.    So, I give it two stars. *Yawn
[EX A]:
NEG