In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

Q: Sentence: Frank was upset with Tom because the toaster he had bought from him didn't work.
 Reason: The 'he' refers to frank because he is the only one who can explain the whole situation to Tom. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

A: Wrong
****
Q: Sentence: Sid explained his theory to Mark but he couldn't convince him.
 Reason: The 'he' refers to sid because he was the one that was able to find the dead bodies and was able to identify the bodies. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

A: Wrong
****
Q: Sentence: Sid explained his theory to Mark but he couldn't convince him.
 Reason: The 'he' refers to sid because mark was not convince by sid explanation. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

A:
Correct
****