We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

If guns are more advanced now, then that's all the more reason we should have the right to defend ourselves against them, not less.
Valid

I know people who want to limit ownership of guns to musket-type weapons as were used when the 2nd amendment was written and people that are for an insane amount of registration and background checks, etc.
Valid

The problem is that widespread guns means greater criminal access to guns which means greater criminal gun use which means bad things.

Valid