We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

[Q]: It is a power, that hath no other end but preservation, and therefore can never* have a right to destroy, enslave, or designedly to impoverish the subjects."
[A]: Valid


[Q]: You would rather be confronted by a guy with a baseball bat because you are FAR more likely to get killed by the guy with the gun.
[A]: Valid


[Q]: We prove our lawfulness not only when we purchase a new gun, but also CCW people have to pass another background check when they apply for a Concealed Handgun License, then take a test and classes to boot?
[A]:
Valid