Given a document, generate a short title of the document. The title should convey the main idea/event/topic about which the document is being written. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

LOS ANGELES (AP) — Oklahoma’s  Dimitri Flowers and Georgia’s Christian Payne  have the same title but very different job descriptions.
 Both  are listed as fullbacks. For Flowers  that’s really a misnomer. Oklahoma coach Lincoln Riley thinks of Flowers as an H-back  as in hybrid. The senior lines up everywhere — receiver  tight end  tailback — allowing the Sooners’ offense to quickly morph from one look to another.
“Really  really  tough ” Oklahoma coach Lincoln Riley said Saturday at Rose Bowl media day. “Most guys  just learning to play one position well is difficult. For  (Flowers)   you’re talking about playing three of four different positions and being able to do them at a high level.”
 Flowers  said  he  has lined up in as many as eight different spots during a single game.
“Besides quarterback   he ’s got to know as much as anybody ” co-offensive coordinator Cale Gundy said.
 Flowers  has only 36 touches this season (13 carries and 23 catches)  but  he  has scored eight touchdowns (four rushing and four receiving). As a runner  the 247-pounder mostly handles short yardage  averaging 2.0 yards per carry. As a receiver   he  is a big-play threat at 17.9 yards a catch.
Flowers’ versatility allows the Sooners to operate up-tempo because they don’t need to change personnel as often. Tight end Mark Andrews provides similar benefits. The All-American is split out wide or lined up in the slot far more than  he  is in tight  next to an offensive tackle.  He ’ll occasionally line up in the backfield. Running back Rodney Anderson is also a major part of Oklahoma’s passing game  with 16 catches for 283 yards and five touchdowns.
2 fullbacks 2 very different jobs heading into Rose Bowl

ObamaCare is a broken mess. Piece by piece we will now begin the process of giving America the great HealthCare it deserves! — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) October 13  2017
Paul Ryan supports  Trump 's decision to end the Obamacare cost-sharing payments and gives no indication that Congress will appropriate them. pic.twitter.com/7c6tVaFoV0 — Sahil Kapur (@sahilkapur) October 13  2017
2. Critics of  Trump ’s decision to end CSR payments seem to forget a federal judge called them unconstitutional and ordered that they stop. — Michael F. Cannon (@mfcannon) October 13  2017
--But the  Trump  administration is injecting turbulence into the Obamacare marketplaces by cutting off the payments just as insurers are finalizing their 2018 plan offerings. Losing the approximately $7 billion in annual payments  which reimburse insurers for discounting deductibles and co-payments for the lowest-income enrollees  is grounds for insurers to back out of their federal contracts to even sell plans next year. The administration had been making the payments on a month-to-month basis  prompting complaints by insurers about a lack of certainty as they tried to plan ahead.
Even a Republican (who is retiring next year) slammed  Trump . Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen (R-Fla.):
It really is remarkable how differently retiring and non-retiring congressional Republicans talk about  President Trump . — Sahil Kapur (@sahilkapur) October 13  2017
 TRUMP TEMPERATURE
--Yesterday  President Trump  signed an anticipated executive order intended to circumvent certain ACA rules by making it easier for individuals and small business to buy alternative types of health insurance with lower prices but fewer benefits  The Post's Amy Goldstein reports.
"The White House and allies portray  the president’s  move as wielding administrative powers to accomplish what congressional Republicans have failed to achieve: fostering more coverage choices while tearing down the law’s insurance marketplaces " Amy writes. "The order represents  Trump ’s biggest step to date to reverse the health-care policies of the Obama administration  a central promise since last year’s presidential campaign.
"Critics  who include state insurance commissioners  most of the health-insurance industry and mainstream policy specialists  predict that a proliferation of these other kinds of coverage will have damaging ripple effects: driving up costs for consumers with serious medical conditions and prompting more insurers to flee the law’s marketplaces. Part of  Trump ’s action  they say  will spark court challenges over  its  legality."
--It expands the availability of short-term insurance policies  which offer limited benefits as a bridge for people between jobs or young adults no longer eligible for their parents’ health plans. The Obama administration ruled that short-term insurance may not last for more than three months;  Trump  wants to extend that to nearly a year.
Of course   Trump  insisted yesterday that  he  was providing "Obamacare relief" in remarks shortly before signing the order. "This will cost the United States government virtually nothing and people will have great  great  healthcare "  he  said. "And when i say people  I mean by the millions and millions."
Members of  Trump 's Cabinet of course cheered the move. Treasury Secertary Steven Mnuchin's statement  per Reuters' Pete Schroeder:
Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin puts out a statement praising  Trump  for his healthcare EO. For some reason. pic.twitter.com/d4YZ4aidfB — Pete Schroeder (@peteschroeder) October 12  2017
How  Trump 's executive order could weaken Obamacare:
Here's how the 25th Amendment works:
The Health 202: Trump moves from firing shots at Obamacare to all

DOJ Inspector General Michael Horowitz  told House Judiciary Democrats in a letter on Friday that the department did not consult  his  office before releasing text messages that are currently under OIG investigation to Congress and the press.
It is still unclear who authorized the decision  if not  Horowitz .
The Justice Department's inspector general   Michael Horowitz   told the House Judiciary Committee on Friday that  his  office (OIG) was not consulted before private text messages that are currently under OIG investigation were shared with members of the media on Tuesday.
 Horowitz  told the committee â which had asked  him  in a previous letter whether the DOJ consulted  his  office before releasing the texts â that  he  testified in November that the OIG "had no objection to the department providing to Congress pre-existing Department records in its custody in response to a Congressional oversight request."
 He  said  he  noted at the time "that the Department would need to determine whether there were any restrictions  such as those affecting grand-jury information  that limited its ability to produce certain records to Congress.
"I conveyed this position to the Department as well  " Horowitz  said. "The Department did not consult with the OIG in order to determine whether releasing the text messages met applicable ethical and legal standards before providing them to Congress."
In short   Horowitz  wrote  the DOJ "did not consult with the OIG before sharing the text messages with the press."
"IG had no objection to release to Congress. We then consulted senior career legal/ethics experts to determine there were no issues w releasing texts to either Congress or press  " Flores wrote. The OIG released another statement on Friday night that echoed the points  Horowitz  made in  his  letter.
But it is still unclear who authorized the decision  if not  Horowitz .
Read  Horowitz 's letter below:

DOJ inspector general wasn't informed before FBI agent texts released