TASK DEFINITION: In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.
PROBLEM: Sentence: Mark told Pete many lies about himself, which Pete included in his book. He should have been more  skeptical.
 Reason: The 'He' refers to pete because the person who should be skeptical is the one lied to. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

SOLUTION: Correct

PROBLEM: Sentence: Dan took the rear seat while Bill claimed the front because his "Dibs!" was slow.
 Reason: The 'his' refers to dan because if your dibs are slow you are more likely to take the unwanted back seat. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

SOLUTION: Correct

PROBLEM: Sentence: I used an old rag to clean the knife, and then I put it in the trash.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the rag because it was used to clean the knife. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

SOLUTION:
Correct