Categorize the comment on the basis of severe toxicity. If the comment is severely toxic output Yes, otherwise output No.

[Q]: Wait, fer reals? That went to court?! And he WON?!? For the sake of every fuck. We finally made it criminal to tell the truth, and it started here. How sickening. I mean, I kinda get it, being socially shunned sucks, but not being able to inform your community about dangerous individuals sucks even worse. It would be one thing if the allegations were false, but if they're true ... well ... if you don't like the consequences maybe you shouldn't have done the deeds? I mean, I made the front page of my city's newspaper for being "different," on the heals of Columbine and on Mother's Day no less, and that was awkward as hell. It never even crossed my mind to accuse the newspaper of any misconduct. I was weird, apparently that was news, and they shared it. Well, fuck me then. 
How is Canada these days?
[A]: Yes


[Q]: Wow, what a wave of preconceived ideas, negative sterotypes,  gross generalizations . . . . .
Studies in the Canadian Arctic, concerning the quality of village life and how it's affected by some portion of the villagers obtaining employment at relatively near-by mining operations  -  - shows a very strong trend to serious damage resulting in the social structures of the village communities.
It isn't all, ALWAYS, about money folks.
[A]: No


[Q]: Good for Gabrielle.  The anti-smoking jihad has turned into a business and a racket.  Interesting timing for the push for this legislation not all that long after voters overwhelmingly approved making marijuana legal here in AK.  Pot is good for you while tobacco is not?  Really?
[A]:
No