We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

Example Input: Well let me first get to this just so everyone will know which side of the gun issue im on, I am an avid gun owner and I support any laws that target criminals while unafecting lawfull gun owners.
Example Output: Valid

Example Input: We, in very large numbers condemned this political tactic by the Democrats, to take an end run on our Constitution.
Example Output: Valid

Example Input: This decision, Cases v US, is where the militia connection qualification (fn2) was born and another, US v Tot is where the "state's right" interpretations (fn3) came into being
Example Output:
Valid