We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

[EX Q]: Sent1: Screw "putting more guns on the street", how about we give gun owners more rights and more legal opportunities to use them and stop pandering to the criminals.
 Sent2: So we should take things/ rights away from people because there is a potential they could do criminal things with them?
[EX A]: Not similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: Basically, when you have a gun free society, then who has them?
 Sent2: You cannot defeat the facts about gun free zones�۪ failure to keep guns out of them so now you attack the messenger!
[EX A]: Not similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: In England, where currently the private ownership of hand guns by the law abiding is absolutely prohibited, crimes involving the use of guns are rapidly increasing: only the criminals have access to them.
 Sent2: This should be a clear indicator that legal ownership of guns in no way has increased potential criminality for law abiding citizens.
[EX A]:
Not similar