Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.

Too bad the RG didn't follow the money. Here are Clark's top contributors <https://secure.sos.state.or.us/orestar/cneSearch.do?cneSearchFilerCommitteeId=6032>:

* Murphy Plywood: $10,000
* Spring Asset Management LLC: $10,000
* Community Action Network: $10,000
* Oregon Realtors Political Action Committee: $8,900 + $5,000
* Simons Properties: $5,699 (x3)
* Seneca Jones Timber Company: $5,000
* Oregon Taxi LLC: $2,500
* Pelroy & Associates LLC: $2,500
* Sylvan Winery: $2,250
* Iris Vineyards: $2,160
* O & S Contractors: $1,500
* Eugene Fire Fighters: $1,500
* NextStep: $1,065
* Don DeZarn: $1,000
* Oregonians for Affordable Housing: $1,000
* Scott Bocci: $1,000
* Akasha Blue: $1,000
* Big Green Events: $788
* Meadows Outdoor Advertising: $750
* Hammer Brothers LLC: $600
* Essig Entertainment: $587 (x3)
* QSL Print Communications: $529
* Paul Conte: $500
No

Are you not afraid of a bad guy with a gun because you know the idiot is not likely trained in how to use it ? That would make  sense.  The Idiot  is not going to hit you from any distance greater then point blank.
As opposed to a trained gun owner that could take out a dog trying to attack his child.
BTW I'd much rather read a story about a dead dog then a 3 year old kid having it's face tore up by the some dog.
Yes

The City bungled the rail project, and now some members of the Charter Commission want the City to manage development along the rail line so that the City can capture revenue from it.  Maybe it sounds good in theory, but rail proves that the City does not have the capacity to do more than to perform the basic functions of a city government -- and it can't even do those well.  When the City gets good at performing those basic functions, only then should it consider expanding to areas where it has no experience.

Yes