In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: toxic and non-toxic. Toxicity is defiend as anything that is rude, disrespectful, or unreasonable that would make someone want to leave a converation.

[Q]: Comment: Darn!  Why does it seem that lawmakers are constantly getting blind sided?  Is it just a fact that private sector have much more knowledgeable and work harder to find 'their cut' vs those who write the laws?  

Repeal the law.  We don't need to be losing $100 M a year in revenues, period.  We taxpayers are NOT going to bail out Oregon just because you politicians are too stupid to understand the laws you are writing.  

I just don't understand humans
[A]: Toxic


[Q]: Comment: CommonWetDreams.org is a completely lame citation.

Try some hard facts instead, It was desperate and huge turnout by white evangelicals in the "firewall" states that put Trump over. 

These fanatics were hardly going to vote for Sanders, who was even more aligned with the "Black Devil" in the White House.

Clinton won the vote of the lower income segment and all race/cultural minorities. Sanders wouldn't have done better.

-- Paul
[A]: Non-toxic


[Q]: Comment: That's a given - Admittedly Pence supporting her was no surprise - after all, she's openly declared that her work in education reform is to "advance God's kingdom", whatever that may mean.
[A]:
Non-toxic