In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

[EX Q]: Comment: Hey, Thatch, back from your vacation in Russian-occupied Crimea? Your fellow trolls missed you.
[EX A]: Non-sexual-explicit

[EX Q]: Comment: No kidding... not once did he call someone a fat slob or mock a handicapped person.   How dare he.   Maybe he will grab someone by the p*ssy to redeem himself.
[EX A]: Sexual-explicit

[EX Q]: Comment: The "seal of Confession" is/was supposed to be a protection for the penitent, not a wall of silence to shelter criminal predator priests with impunity.  Priests who weaponize the confessional as an opportunity to rape and sodomize children and vulnerable adults should not be able to use "the seal" to dodge and conceal their criminal assaults - ever.

Part of any reform and renewal of the priesthood Catholics should restrict the faculties for confessors to those men and women who have received special training in psychology and certification of their probity. 

Priests have been abusing the confessional since the early centuries of the church.  The sacrament of Reconciliation is suppose to be a source of mercy and peace - not an occasion of rape for sexual perverts:  Time for reform!
[EX A]:
Sexual-explicit