We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Q: If you support the right to bear arms, ultimately you believe that a person should be allowed to kill somebody in self defense.

A: Invalid
****
Q: it is quite clear that Jesus did not support the death penalty.

A: Valid
****
Q: People convicted in those crimes had nothing to do with DNA but police errors upon which they were exonerated.This took place in a time when sentencing disparity was present.

A:
Valid
****