We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

[Q]: If the Second Amendment doesn't apply to the states then there is no Second Amendment legal protection against state gun laws (which would include any state laws that ban guns in school areas).
[A]: Valid


[Q]: How about you bring an actual debate to the table for once instead of resorting to cheap, underhanded, inflammatory stupidity that contributes nothing and just brings down the average for gun haters everywhere.
[A]: Valid


[Q]: In both cases you are talking about limiting somebodies fundamental rights because their exercise of those rights cause minimal mental discomfort to others...basically destroying fundamental rights because others might find them annoying.
[A]:
Valid