In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Input: Consider Input: Comment: If we go by the writer's logic, all cities should increase taxes on their rich, so high, that all the rich leave the city because as per the writer when rich will leave "Cheaper housing, fewer jerks. It’s a win/win". Listen to the writer, all cities throw out your rich. I hope the writer gets the sarcasm

Output: Non-sexual-explicit


Input: Consider Input: Comment: I did not say anything about Adams, I simply asked you a question. You are a waste of ink space fish...you are too inconsistent.

Output: Non-sexual-explicit


Input: Consider Input: Comment: "the men"? You mean the bishops? Prove they don't love homosexuals. Prove it. Homosexual activity is evil. Its simple. All people are to be loved, not used as objects. Homosexual activity uses another person as an object to masturbate with.  Not so nice!


Output: Sexual-explicit