In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: threat and non-threat. Threat is a statement that someone will be hurt or harmed, especially if the person does not do something in particular.

Q: Comment: Completely agree.  The RCAF serves  this country well.  We lost a pilot yesterday.  I hope his family doesn't read the article about his death and then scroll down and see the RCAF's name denigrated in this cavalier and un-funny manner.  Pathetic.

A: Non-threat
****
Q: Comment: O: "At the time of the Iraq invasion, Trump was not a politician and much more likely to let his true inside be known."

Well his 'true inside' at the time was support for the invasion. Tepid support, but support nonetheless.

O: "I believe him when he says he did not support the war since demonstration thereof requires action. . "

By definition, answering a question on a nationally-syndicated radio show constitutes taking an "action." 

The funny thing is that this is such a stupid issue. When asked, Trump could have said, "At the time, I was sort of for it but I wasn't really sure." Presto! No issue. Everyone would have understood because that was the mood of the country at the time. But for some reason he just isn't wired that way.

A: Non-threat
****
Q: Comment: Maybe the CIA is working on this already, but it seems like surgical drone strikes to take out Un should be attempted.  He's a fat kid, should be easy to hit him.

A:
Threat
****