In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

[EX Q]: Comment: Douglas Saunders is right about one thing.  Blacks are better off under Obama. Where else in the world can a single Black woman have six children from six different "Baby Daddies" and collect $60,000 in cash cards and housing benefits annually, free medical care for her family, pay no taxes, doesn't even have to look for work let alone work, and when her children are in school they get two or three free meals a day, and free meals even in some states during summer vacation. And the "Baby Daddies" don't have to pay child support. Life is good in the hood.
[EX A]: Non-sexual-explicit

[EX Q]: Comment: Yeah, I'e been living with this issue for most of my life. I'm happy to keep it alive.

There's no question that men who make sexual overtures from a position of power commit an abuse of power. And yes, it's exactly these blurry lines that become problematic.

When I was quite young (I may even have been a minor) I had a boss who got sexual with me when we were alone in a room. I rebuffed him, and he was a gentleman about it. I was really annoyed, but I continued to work at that job for a while. Was it an abuse of power? Yes. Was it a crime? Actually, legally it may have been. But I don't think of it as a crime. Women used to experience this kind of stuff all the time. I'd like to think the culture has changed a bit since then.

Unfortunately, as you may remember, I have also been a rape victim. So I give women who claim they've been raped the benefit of the doubt. But...at times, it's not the truth.
[EX A]: Sexual-explicit

[EX Q]: Comment: You didn't answer my questions. To extend, you seem unable to answer my questions. So much for your lack of naivety.
[EX A]:
Non-sexual-explicit