In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

Example Input: Sentence: Susan knew that Ann's son had been in a car accident, because she told her about it.
 Reason: The 'she' refers to ann because of the many other details of his story that have been reported in the media. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Example Output: Wrong

Example Input: Sentence: There is a gap in the wall. You can see the garden behind it .
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the wall because The gap is the main subject, not the wall. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Example Output: Correct

Example Input: Sentence: The large ball crashed right through the table because it was made of steel.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the large ball because of the metal balls and the fact that the table was likely rolled and stored in a warehouse. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Example Output:
Wrong