We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Example Input: Peterson could face the death penalty or life without parole.
Example Output: Valid

Example Input: Stanford did an experiment on prison rehabilitation and psychology, and had an extremely interesting outcome.
Example Output: Valid

Example Input: Or you could merely ignore them and concede that the death penalty is flawed, kills innocent people and costs the lives of innocents in the use of how it is funded
Example Output:
Valid