Given a document, find the main entity about whom the author is writing. Write the full name if mentioned in the text. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

Q: Mitt Romney  the former governor of Massachusetts   is now a Senate candidate in Utah â and the announcement of  his  candidacy shows  he âs sensitive about being labeled a carpetbagger.
âUtah â the Republican says at the beginning of a video  he  shared Friday morning on social media  âis admired not only for its beauty  but also for the character of its people. Utahns are known for hard work  innovation  and our can-do pioneering spirit. But more than these  weâre known as a people who serve  who care  and who rise to any occasion.â
It goes on like this for more than two minutes. One reporter joked on Twitter that he lost count of how many times  Romney  said âUtah.â The strategy telegraphed in recent days is clear and multipronged: Romney  who fell short in two previous White House bids and emerged as one of Donald Trumpâs fiercest critics  is trying to persuade voters that he is laser-focused on his adopted state and not on the president or the job heâs pined for in the past.
Though on paper this should be a cakewalk â Romney is hardly a stranger in Utah  and Democrats have little chance of picking up the seat â two prominent Republicans have made an issue of Romneyâs Trump-bashing and his relocation to the West. One of them  State Auditor John Dougall  told BuzzFeed News that GOP activists in and outside Utah have been encouraging him after he said this week that he was seriously considering challenging  Romney .
Dougall added that  Romney  had called  him  Thursday evening to inform  him  of  his  imminent announcement  which has been anticipated since Sen. Orrin Hatch made his retirement plans known last month. âI wished him all the best â Dougall said of  Romney .
A  Romney  spokesperson did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Dougall declined to say who is encouraging him to run. But he suggested support would come from those concerned about electing someone who would not be aligned with Trump. For weeks on his Facebook page  Dougall has been arguing against a âcoronationâ of  Romney .
After the phone interview  Dougall added via email: âI should have also mentioned that âIt's clear that Utahns have a very favorable view of  Mr. Romney . The odds are strongly in  his  favor.ââ
Earlier this week  Utah Republican Party Chair Rob Anderson noted  Romney âs criticism of Trump and spoke dismissively of his Utah credentials in an interview with the Salt Lake Tribune: âI think heâs keeping out candidates that I think would be a better fit for Utah because  letâs face it   Mitt Romney  doesnât live here   his  kids werenât born here   he  doesnât shop here.â
Anderson later apologized to  Romney .
âIâve no doubt that  Mitt Romney  satisfies all qualifications to run for Senate â said Anderson in a Wednesday statement posted on Twitter  âand as chairman of the Utah Republican Party  I will treat all candidates equally to ensure their path to the party nomination is honest and fair.â

A: Mitt Romney
****
Q: Certainly  Game 3 of the National League Division Series  won  2-1  by the Chicago Cubs over the Washington Nationals  was a kind of paradise for second-guessing. In fact  some might say the final score was: Decisions that blew up on Dusty Baker (2) over Decision that blew up on Joe Maddon (1).
Asked whether he’d heard Rizzo yelling  Baker said  “Nah  I don’t care. I’d have screamed  too.”
Soon  it was Baker’s turn. In the seventh inning with one out  Ben Zobrist broke up what had been a marvelous  downright gallant no-hit bid by Max Scherzer  who had spent the last nine days wondering whether the next time he pitched full-bore he might blow out his tight right hamstring and be done for the year. Before this game  Scherzer said he figured he would be good for maybe 100 pitches. He was at 98.
 Baker  called for Solis. The Cubs countered with the dangerous Albert Almora Jr.  who hit .342 against southpaws this year. Almora singled home the tying run on a change-up that stayed — up.
Finally  in the brutal eighth  in a decision and a moment that may be the most painful of the Nationals’ season if they do not rebound from this deficit   Baker  decided not to intentionally walk Rizzo  the Cubs’ top RBI man — by miles — and instead bring in lefty specialist Perez to cope with him. It was a journeyman-with-a-specialty against a superstar.
 Baker  had options.  He  could have walked Rizzo and let Brandon Kintzler  an all-star closer this year for the Minnesota Twins  pitch to Cubs cleanup man Willson Contreras  who is powerful but strikeout prone.  He  could even have (perhaps) overmanaged and brought in  his  best pure-stuff right-hander  Ryan Madson  to face Contreras to try to overpower  him .
Instead   Baker  believed in Perez. And  since this is baseball  Perez won the battle but lost the game. Perez jammed Rizzo  forcing that weak  sickly blooper into left field. That  anyway  is how it was described by  several Nats  including Baker . To the Cubs  it was a perfectly placed clutch hit.
For the record  as they say  with perfect hindsight  I think that  the Nats  may have managed as if the playoffs were different from the regular season — which is a current vogue. If this game had been played in August  I suspect there would have been little complexity.
And better options might have been chosen — ones that did not end up with  the Nats  losing a huge game in which neither of their two best relievers  Madson or Sean Doolittle  ever appeared.
Could that all have worked out so simply? Kintzler in the seventh  Madson in the eighth and Doolittle in the ninth to put the Nats one win from the National League Championship Series? For what it’s worth  not one Nat  and I asked several  had any problem with any Baker move. One veteran said  “We are a solid team — in every area. It’s not like we have a couple of good relievers and nobody else we trust. Our bullpen is good all the way through now. Nobody’s second-guessing those decisions.”

A: Baker
****
Q: Fannie and Freddie buy mortgages and package them into securities with a guarantee against default.
 Fannie and Freddie have a legal right to return bad loans  especially if they later discover fraudulent statements on applications. Any money they recover offsets their losses.
 A bigger headache for lawmakers is figuring out what to do with Fannie and Freddie in the future.
 The Obama administration is working on a plan to restructure the mortgage market and make sure home loans are affordable. Officials don't plan to release details until next year. But Michael Barr  an assistant Treasury secretary  told the panel Wednesday that Fannie and Freddie "will not exist in the same form as they did in the past."
 Republicans have seized on the administration's management of Fannie and Freddie to illustrate Democrats' push for broadening the reach of the federal government. They say loans acquired by Fannie and Freddie since the September 2008 takeover have put taxpayers at risk.
 But Democrats and regulators say the loans acquired by Fannie and Freddie before their takeover represent the overwhelming majority of the companies' losses. New loans acquired since then have been performing well  they note.
 "There is no urgency " to reform the two companies  said Rep. Barney Frank  the committee's chairman. "The pattern of abuse they had engaged in has been changed...Fannie and Freddie are behaving differently and are causing far less problems."

A:
Freddie Freddie
****