We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

That most people can't be trusted, so we should have more laws against guns, which most people will abide by because they can be trusted.
Valid

Yet this gun grabber group of drooling nit wits wants more laws that attack the law abiding.
Valid

Anybody else in American history able to lend credibility to your belief that the Second Amendment was all about gun control and how gun ownership was never intended to be an individual right?

Valid