TASK DEFINITION: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.
PROBLEM: Well, I'd rather my money go towards a bullet for a child-rapist than his food, water, and room for the rest of his life.

SOLUTION: Valid

PROBLEM: States without the death penalty have fared BETTER in reducing their murder rates than states with the death penalty.

SOLUTION: Valid

PROBLEM: Also, there is a theory, that people tend to be angry if the group of people their anger is directed towards had once done something to them, such as rape or sexual assualt.

SOLUTION:
Invalid