In this task, you're given a statement, and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence clearly disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3' corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.

Ex Input:
Statement: It is time to revisit and update the Clean Air Act once again in order to achieve the additional reductions needed to address public health and environmental problems in the most cost effective manner. Choices:  1. The Clean Air Act does not require any updates at this time. 2. The Clean Air Act does not currently address environmental problems in the most optimal way. 3. The Clean Air Act would be improved by reducing carbon emission limits on motorcycles.

Ex Output:
1


Ex Input:
Statement: no no it's funny uh i got out and got my bachelor's degree in uh seventy three and uh never went to a game there and have never gone to a game since Choices:  1. I went and got a degree in '73, but never bothered to go to a game! 2. I got my degree in '73, but never went to a baseball game. 3. I went to every game I could have gone to, despite not going since.

Ex Output:
3


Ex Input:
Statement: Nevertheless, our view today is that the widespread lack of attention to strategic human capital management may be creating a fundamental weakness in federal management, possibly even putting at risk the federal government's ability to efficiently, economically, and effectively deliver products and service to the taxpayers in the future. Choices:  1. The lack of attention is likely to cause weakness in federal management. 2. There is a lot of attention put into the human capital. 3. The federal management needs to improve how they manage human capital.

Ex Output:

2