We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

Example Input: Let me ask you a question if I might: How do you explain the 2nd Amendment phrase ���the right of the people���?
Example Output: Valid

Example Input: Most of the "gun control" laws we have in the US have no potential to impact crime at all, except perhaps making the streets safer for criminals who have an unarmed public to prey upon.
Example Output: Valid

Example Input: The beginning part of the Second Amendment doesn't determine what its sole nature is about.
Example Output:
Valid