We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Ex Input:
Sent1: In Silveira v. Lockyer the 9th Circuit Court ruled that California's Assault Weapons Control Act is not unconstitutional and that the second amendment does not protect an individual right.
 Sent2: Somebody challenged California's assault weapons ban and the court ruled the ban is not unconstitutional because there is no individual right to keep and bear arms.

Ex Output:
Similar


Ex Input:
Sent1: If gun bans worked there would be no gun deaths in the countries that have banned guns.
 Sent2: there are too many gun deaths and while there will never be a ban in America i find it appalling that so many fight to prevent gun restrictions and background checks.

Ex Output:
Not similar


Ex Input:
Sent1: The anti gun/gun control advocate way at dealing with deaths caused by guns is to limit the right to bear arms.
 Sent2: Anybody that wants gun control laws that infringe on the right to bear arms is a gun haters!

Ex Output:

Not similar