The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.

[EX Q]: Context: 'Hello, what are your preferences for extra supplies?  I am greatly in need of food and water.  We will be doing a lot of activity in a hot, dry climate.🙂' 'I prefer firewood because I will get cold at night. I forgot blankets ☹️'
Utterance: 'Would it work for you, then, to give me the three food and three water, and I can give you all of the firewood?'
[EX A]: No

[EX Q]: Context: 'I like firewood and water most' 'Hmm okay, I am willing to give you three waters! I was hoping to get 3 firewood though, as it's going to be really cold where I am going.' 'seems like we have same priority items. firewood. I also need firewood most because I am prone to pneumonia '
Utterance: 'Oh no, I'm so sorry to hear that ☹️ Let me ask about the food first then, would you be willing to give me the 3 packages of that? I am going to have a lot of people with me and we won't be near any stores at all.'
[EX A]: Yes

[EX Q]: Context: 'How many people are in your camping party?' 'i have 6, and 2 more could be joining us to make 8 ' 'Cool! 🙂  It's a good number, we are planning on 10, but you never know on these.  What I do know is this group loves to eat and hike, plus it might get a little chilly.'
Utterance: 'yeah, i understand that. we are all apart of a weigh watchers group ao we'
[EX A]:
No