Given a document and an entity the task is to select the author's sentiment towards the entity. Sentiments can be Positive, Neutral and Negative. Select Positive if the article expresses a positive view towards the given entity or praises its quality or skills. Select Neutral if the document expresses no clear view towards the entity or has equal amounts of positive and negative statements or expressing some fact/quote by someone else. Select Negative if the article expresses a negative view towards like harsh remarks, criticizing entities action/decision etc. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

Input: Consider Input: What is the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Fred Trump Jr ? drug message on Thursday at the White House   discussing how  his  elder brother ' s struggle with addiction led him to never drink or smoke .  Fred Trump Jr  . struggled with alcoholism for much of  his  life and died in 1981 at age 43 .  Trump  has cited  his  brother ' s short life when pushing for tougher drug enforcement and awareness and did so again on Thursday . " I had a brother   Fred . Great guy   best - looking guy   best personality   much better than mine  "  Trump  said . " But  he  had a problem .  He  had a problem with alcohol   and  he  would tell me   ' Don ' t drink .  He  was substantially older   and I listened to  him  and I respected (  him  )." Ever since  his  brother ' s warning    Trump  said    he  has abstained from drinking and smoking because  he  had " somebody that guided me " in that aspect of life .

Output: Neutral


Input: Consider Input: What is the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Chris Kennedy ? * Democratic governor candidate Chris Kennedy  will meet with voters at a Brown Line stop  then later have a announcement with Chicago principals association President Troy LaRaviere.
* Kennedy  tosses out the term "immoral" regarding Pritzker  Biss:  Democratic governor candidate Chris Kennedy  ramped up  his  rhetoric against rivals J.B. Pritzker and state Sen. Daniel Biss on Tuesday  questioning their morals and ethics while billing  himself  as the one who has the âmoral frameworkâ to govern.
The campaigns of Pritzker and Biss fired back  accusing  Kennedy  of having acted in ways  he  is criticizing.
Surrounded by supportive African-American clergy at a Bronzeville campaign stop   Kennedy  labeled as âimmoralâ assessment reductions Pritzker sought for  his  property and asked  âDo you want someone who says  âWhat I did do was legal  therefore itâs right?â That is not the ethical  the moral framework that we want as the leader of our state.â
 Kennedy  went on to criticize Biss  an Evanston lawmaker  for  his  sponsorship of legislation later deemed unconstitutional that would have reduced pension benefits to public employee retirees. Biss âepitomizes the brutality of government (with) the idea that he would go and take away the retirement security from hundreds of thousands of people living in our state and do it illegally â  Kennedy  said.
Asked later by a reporter if  he  was claiming  he  was the only moral candidate in the contest   Kennedy  said  âI claim no morality myself.â But in earlier remarks   he  said of  himself   âDo you want someone to lead this state whoâs prepared to lead  who has a moral framework and ethical background who understands the difference between right and wrong?â (Rick Pearson)
*Pritzker hits back: Pritzker campaign manager Anne Caprara accused  Kennedy  of resorting âto the Donald Trump playbook of calling names.â
âWe understand  Chris Kennedy  really wants to win  but for  him  to question the morality of  his  opponents is frankly disturbing â Caprara said in a statement.
*So does Biss: Biss campaign spokesman Tom Elliott noted  Kennedy âs use of the property tax assessment appeal system  including getting a reduction for the familyâs Wolf Point development.
 âChris Kennedy  has no moral authority here â Elliott said in a statement.
âBoth  Kennedy  and Pritzker have taken advantage of a broken system they now want to fix â Elliot said. âAnd while hiring well-connected lawyers or ripping toilets out of their homes to reduce their property taxes arenât technically illegal  they do raise serious moral and ethical questions and puts into perspective where their priorities were before they decided to bankroll their campaigns for governor."

Output: Negative


Input: Consider Input: What is the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Kirsten Gillibrand ? Sen. Elizabeth âPocahontasâ Warren (D-Mass.) implied  Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY)  is a slut when  she  claimed President Trump was âslut shamingâ  Gillibrand :
Does  she  not have a clue? Is âslut shamingâ even a terrible thing? In what traditional  historical culture has sluttiness been valued as a high-standard for society?
And if  Gillibrand  isnât a slut  then why does Pocahontas feel the need to defend her from âslut shaming?â Is  she  really that inept? Maybe so  considering how  she  thinks  she âs Native American.
Sen. Elizabeth Warren defended her Democratic colleague on Twitter  going after Trump for attacking  Gillibrand .
Defend  her  sluttiness?
The Trump tweet also led to other Democratic lawmakers taking on the president  with Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren calling Trumpâs remark that  Gillibrand  âwould do anything forâ donations âslut-shamingâ and Connecticut Sen. Richard Blumenthal calling it a âsexist slur.â
Several female senators also rallied around  Gillibrand   including Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.)  who pointedly asked Trump on Twitter whether he was trying to âbully  intimidate and slut-shameâ Gillibrand.
In other words  they felt the need to defend  Gillibrand  from âslut shaming.â


Output: Negative