In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: threat and non-threat. Threat is a statement that someone will be hurt or harmed, especially if the person does not do something in particular.

Ex Input:
Comment: To costly. Just shoot em I say.

Ex Output:
Threat


Ex Input:
Comment: Bet the ranch that HAL, et al will devise extra fees for asinine and mediocre items like persons weighing over the "average weight"; fees for not greeting flight attendants with a smile, needing assistance with placing bags into overhead compartments, etc., etc.

Ex Output:
Non-threat


Ex Input:
Comment: So populism which gives a voice to the peasants in a democratic manner, is somehow supposed to be bad for democracy because of...uhm... Hitler? Did this woman use Godwin's Law in all the other Supreme Court deliberations?  Me think the lady doth protest too much.

Her antiquated notion that we need to 'respect' the boundaries of the press and government is precisely why populism is disrupting the normal social order. The common man (and woman) is sick and tired of being lied to by the charlatans who hide being the same boundaries. 

Hence - tada - populism.
Get used to it sweetheart, the plebs are revolting.

Ex Output:

Non-threat