In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine the neutral choice based on your inference from the statement and your commonsense knowledge. The neutral choice is a sentence that neither agrees nor disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3', corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence. If sentence X agrees with sentence Y, one's correctness follows from the other one. If sentence X disagrees with sentence Y, they can not be correct at the same time.

[Q]: Statement: In the case of H-2A workers, the reading would require the conclusion that Congress intended to provide H-2A workers with legal services representation on claims arising from their employment contracts only for the very brief periods that the workers are in the United States -- potentially rendering the promise of legal representation largely meaningless. Choices: 1. This reading would require the conclusion that Congress had intended for H-2A workers to only get legal representation when they were in the country. 2. This reading would require the conclusion that Congress had intended for H-2A workers to only get legal representation when they were outside of the country. 3. From a legal standpoint, most judges and legal scholars would agree that this is asking for chaos.
[A]: 3


[Q]: Statement: Is there something more, sir? Choices: 1. There's nothing else obviously, sir. 2. Was there anything else, sir? 3. This wasn't the first time he'd been asked that question.
[A]: 3


[Q]: Statement: I should suggest that we call upon him there as soon as possible. Choices: 1. I think he has the answers we need and we should see him now. 2. I think we should visit him soon. 3. I think it would be a waste of time to go see him.
[A]:
1