The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.

Context: 'i am great, super excited about camping as well, are there any supplies that you really need?' 'i really need water and food. we did not get enough of those.' 'Those are my priorities as well, how about you get all the food and two firewoods, and i get all the water and one firewood, does that sound fair?'
Utterance: 'i would prefer water instead of food if possible, but i am sure we can work it out.'
No

Context: 'Hi how are you hope all is well and are you getting ready for your trip?' 'Yes same to you. I am very excited to be going on this trip cannot wait to start hiking. Do you have any plans for yours?'
Utterance: 'Yes we (my boyfriend daughter and I) want to go to the mountain top its not going to be easy with this weather but we will make it how about YOu?'
No

Context: 'HI. I'd love to get 2 additional packs of firewood. The weather forecast was for much warmer weather here and I just didn't bring enough with me. I also left my additional sweatshirt at home. I'd be happy to give you one additional water and two of food.  🙂🙂'
Utterance: 'Well I had a really great day fishing today and I would like to have some extra firewood so I can cook all of this fish.  How about I take the 3 packages of firewood and you can keep 2 additional food packages in return.'

No