Given a document, an entity and its sentiment towards the entity, verify if it is the correct sentiment towards the entity. Answer should be yes or no. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

[Q]: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Michael Cohen is Positive . "In a private transaction in 2016  I used my own personal funds to facilitate a payment of $130 000 to Ms. Stephanie Clifford "  Michael Cohen  said in a statement. "Neither the Trump Organization nor the Trump campaign was a party to the transaction with Ms. Clifford  and neither reimbursed me for the payment  either directly or indirectly."
Just weeks before the 2016 election   Cohen  reportedly created a private LLC to pay Clifford  otherwise known as Stormy Daniels  following an alleged July 2006 encounter with Trump  The Wall Street Journal reported in January
Following initial reports last month that  Cohen  had made the payment   he  said in a statement that Trump "vehemently denies" any encounter between the two.
In January   the organization Common Cause filed complaints with the Federal Election Commission and the Justice Department  alleging that the reported payment to Clifford constituted a campaign finance violation. But on Tuesday   Cohen 's statement denied that accusation and said the monetary exchange was "lawful" and "not a campaign contribution."
"The payment to Ms. Clifford was lawful  and was not a campaign contribution or a campaign expenditure by anyone "  Cohen  said.
 Cohen  also said  he  filed a reply with the FEC  but that filing will not be public until the agency has resolved the matter.
When asked why  he  made the payment   Cohen  told CNN: "Just because something isn't true doesn't mean that it can't cause you harm or damage. I will always protect Mr. Trump."
[A]: yes


[Q]: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Trumper is Negative . Thatâs not too far of a fling  actually. One really bad move could do it  but  Trump  has insulated  himself  with people far more competent and worthy of  their  positions. To date   they âre keeping  him  from stepping over the edge.
I never thought he could do the job. Heâs made some solid moves in his first year in office  but I actually give the credit to those around him. As I said from the beginning  it was the Cabinet that would do the actual work  and much like his business dealings   Trump  would be the Ronald McDonald of politics.  He âs the face of the presidency  but the actual work is being done by somebody else.
Wolff leans to some old rumors in the book about Trumpâs campaign plans. Namely   he  never intended to be president.  He  was going to clean up by being the almost president  build up a ready-made audience  and launch a new TV network venture  TrumpTV.
Because nobody thought  he  would win  nobody prepared for the job. In fact  while  Trump  bragged openly to  his  glassy-eyed followers that  he âd finance  his  own campaign and be beholden to none (How many times did I hear a Trumper say  â He  canât be bought!â)   he  put very little of  his  own money into the campaign.  He  took donations  like every other candidate  but to this day  not a single  Trump  supporter can be convinced of that.
 He  didnât run  his  campaign like somebody that wanted to win. It was a show to  him .  He  was worthless in debates  because  he  obviously didnât understand the questions being asked of  him   but  his  base would flood online polls and declare  him  the winner  even before the debates were over (which tells me they didnât understand the questions  either  nor did they care).
 Trump  struck out at Wolff on Friday night (on Twitter  of course)  slamming  him  as a âloserâ and calling  his  book âboring and untruthful.â
Ok. Wolff  however  is thanking  Trump  for helping  him  sell books  which  in turn  is opening eyes.
[A]: no


[Q]: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity LeBron James is Negative . During Game 3 of the NBA Eastern Conference Finals on Saturday , LeBron James was accidentally elbowed , leading to one of the most egregious , over-the-top flops in NBA history . 
The referee ended up handing out a technical foul to the Toronto Raptors , despite the fact that it was actually James ' teammate who elbowed him .
[A]:
yes