We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Sent1: The death penalty is not deterrance for the person executed.
 Sent2: Peterson could face the death penalty or life without parole.
Not similar

Sent1: Only some states use the death penalty, only some countries allow the death penalty.
 Sent2: If anything, this kind of "argument" is an argument for abolishing the death penalty, since it isn't used uniformly across the entire country.
Not similar

Sent1: If they know they'll die if caught, they'll likely kill more rape victims and children.
 Sent2: OF THE VICTIM would be able to visit or at least know they're family members are alive if the criminal hadn't KILLED THEM!!

Not similar