We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

Ex Input:
That right there is reason enough not to give government absolute control over firearms.

Ex Output:
Valid


Ex Input:
We exhibit to mankind the remarkable spectacle of a people attacked by unprovoked enemies, without any imputation or even suspicion of offence.

Ex Output:
Valid


Ex Input:
In this case you are talking curtailing doctors fundamental rights because somebody was INCONVENIENCED.

Ex Output:

Valid