In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Example Input: Comment: As you can see, the problem is that it fails to comply with Federal statute. No gender-based discrimination, buster. It obviously also flies in the face of the principles of our US Constitution.

40 U.S. Code § 122 - Prohibition on sex discrimination
(a)Prohibition.— With respect to a program or activity carried on or receiving federal assistance under this subtitle, an individual may not be excluded from participation, denied benefits, or otherwise discriminated against based on sex.
Example Output: Non-obscene

Example Input: Comment: Yes, your analysis is crap. Your first statement is apples and oranges. The Canadian soldiers don't have to sue to get their benefits (although Harper was headed that way). You haven't read the case so you have no clue what it was actually about. Finally, the "lefties" applaud getting the damn thing over with at a lower cost. Your problem was with the 3 previous governments, this part of things was inevitable. Harper (he did love losing at the Supeme Court)would likely have been stupid enough to fight it and triple the cost.
Example Output: Obscene

Example Input: Comment: The Chinese do not make mistakes when it comes to protocol. Forcing Obama out the ass of the plane was planed. Another sad day for world diplomacy.
Example Output:
Obscene