In this task, you are given the abstract of a research paper. Your task is to generate a summary of this abstract. Your summary should not be very short, but it's better if it's not more than 30 words.

Input: Consider Input: Careful tuning of the learning rate, or even schedules thereof, can be crucial to effective neural net training. There has been much recent interest in gradient-based meta-optimization, where one tunes hyperparameters, or even learns an optimizer, in order to minimize the expected loss when the training procedure is unrolled. But because the training procedure must be unrolled thousands of times, the meta-objective must be defined with an orders-of-magnitude shorter time horizon than is typical for neural net training. We show that such short-horizon meta-objectives cause a serious bias towards small step sizes, an effect we term short-horizon bias. We introduce a toy problem, a noisy quadratic cost function, on which we analyze short-horizon bias by deriving and comparing the optimal schedules for short and long time horizons. We then run meta-optimization experiments (both offline and online) on standard benchmark datasets, showing that meta-optimization chooses too small a learning rate by multiple orders of magnitude, even when run with a moderately long time horizon (100 steps) typical of work in the area. We believe short-horizon bias is a fundamental problem that needs to be addressed if meta-optimization is to scale to practical neural net training regimes.

Output: We investigate the bias in the short-horizon meta-optimization objective.


Input: Consider Input: Neural networks exhibit good generalization behavior in the
 over-parameterized regime, where the number of network parameters
 exceeds the number of observations. Nonetheless,
 current generalization bounds for neural networks fail to explain this
 phenomenon. In an attempt to bridge this gap, we study the problem of
 learning a two-layer over-parameterized neural network, when the data is generated by a linearly separable function. In the case where the network has Leaky
 ReLU activations, we provide both optimization and generalization guarantees for over-parameterized networks.
 Specifically, we prove convergence rates of SGD to a global
 minimum and provide generalization guarantees for this global minimum
 that are independent of the network size. 
 Therefore, our result clearly shows that the use of SGD for optimization both finds a global minimum, and avoids overfitting despite the high capacity of the model. This is the first theoretical demonstration that SGD can avoid overfitting, when learning over-specified neural network classifiers.

Output: We show that SGD learns two-layer over-parameterized neural networks with Leaky ReLU activations that provably generalize on linearly separable data.


Input: Consider Input: Foveation is an important part of human vision, and a number of deep networks have also used foveation. However, there have been few systematic comparisons between foveating and non-foveating deep networks, and between different variable-resolution downsampling methods. Here we define several such methods, and compare their performance on ImageNet recognition with a Densenet-121 network. The best variable-resolution method slightly outperforms uniform downsampling. Thus in our experiments, foveation does not substantially help or hinder object recognition in deep networks.


Output: We compare object recognition performance on images that are downsampled uniformly and with three different foveation schemes.