TASK DEFINITION: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.
PROBLEM: Comment: Trump has no balls.   As with others he has criticized from a distance, he will be effusive in his (meaningless) praise for the pope when they meet in person.

SOLUTION: Sexual-explicit

PROBLEM: Comment: That is 100 % an impossibility. If you are pro life and vote and support candidates and a party that advocates full term and late term abortion at will then you cannot under any circumstance be pro life.

You have to look at where the candidates stand. Hillary wants us to be required to provide and pay for abortions and abortive medicines. She stated flat out in the debate she supports full term partial birth murder. HOW can ANY Catholic support her. Then there are the e - mails where she, through her campaign, states how "backwards" we are and advocates groups to sping to action when they can incite a "Catholic Spring." SHE will use law and the courts to mandate the marrying of homosexuals and the providing of abortion procedures. No Catholic can vote for her.

SOLUTION: Non-sexual-explicit

PROBLEM: Comment: As if the Liberals can't spend our money (including our children and grand children's)  fast enough, they have to hand it over to a terrorist as well.

I think their game is to put Canada so far near the brink of financial destruction that the party that replaces them has absolutely no chance of success as they will have nothing to work with.   I guess that is how they guarantee their survival.

It is sicking having had to watch the mess unfold in Ontario and now see it just starting to fester for the entire Country.

SOLUTION:
Non-sexual-explicit