Given a document, an entity and its sentiment towards the entity, verify if it is the correct sentiment towards the entity. Answer should be yes or no. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

[Q]: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Stanley Fischer is Positive . Federal Reserve Vice Chair Stanley Fischer  announced last week  he  was resigning for personal reasons before the end of  his  term  opening yet another seat in the central bank's powerful board for President Donald Trump to fill.
The departure of  Fischer   73  represents a big loss of institutional knowledge and gravitas for the Fed at a time when many American institutions are sorely lacking in technocratic expertise.  Fischer  is considered the leader of a generation of prominent academic and professional economics  in part because  he  taught many of them at MIT.
" He  is often referred to as the dean of central bankers  having taught most central bankers including former Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke and European Central Bank president Mario Draghi " Shawn Baldwin  the chairman of AIA Group  wrote in a LinkedIn post. " Fischer 's departure creates a vacuum not easily filled  adding to the uncertainty in monetary policy."
Larry Summers  the Harvard economist and former Treasury secretary  dubbed  Fischer 's resignation "the end of an era."
Fischer  who was born in Zambia and later studied in London  started his career as an academic but became a policymaker at the World Bank and later the International Monetary Fund  where he rose to the role of first deputy managing director.  Fischer  then spent three years at Citigroup as a vice chairman before moving to Israel in 2005 to become the head of its central bank.  Fischer  returned to the US as Fed vice chairman in 2014.  His  term was not set to end until June 2018.
"The Fed and the international monetary system will be weaker for  his  departure from official responsibility " Summers wrote in a blog post.
" Stan 's has been a singular career "  he  said. "As an MIT professor he coauthored  with  his  close friend Rudi Dornbusch  the macro textbook that defined the basics of the field for a generation. With Olivier Blanchard " the former IMF chief economist  "he wrote the treatise that defined the state of the art for graduate students. His lectures were models of lucid exposition and balanced judgment. My view of monetary economics was shaped by my experience auditing his class in the Fall of 1978."
Not everyone is complimentary about the arc of  Fischer 's career. To some  he represents the kind of establishment economics that led to financial instability and income inequality in many parts of the world.
During his time at the IMF   Fischer  became the face of austerity measures gone wrong. Many of his and the IMF's recommendations for drastic spending cuts during the Asian financial crisis of the late 1990s have since been widely discredited as having made matters worse.
"I see  Fischer  as to a large extent the embodiment of the conventional wisdom among macroeconomists and central bankers " said Dean Baker  the director of the Center for Economic and Policy Research  a liberal Washington think tank. " He  also  in the pre-crisis days  was very much associated with the deregulation of finance gang  although I think  he  has developed an appreciation of the need for regulation since the crisis."
Indeed   Fischer  has spoken out rather strongly against efforts by Trump and Republicans to unwind most of the key regulations imposed on Wall Street after the crisis with the aim of preventing a repeat performance.
"We seem to have forgotten that we had a financial crisis  which was caused by behavior in the banking and other parts of the financial system  and it did enormous damage to this economy "  Fischer  told CNBC in April  just as the president was signing an executive order aimed at what  he  said was "reviewing" Dodd-Frank.
"Millions of people lost their jobs  millions of people lost their houses "  Fischer  said. "This was not a small-time  regular recession. This was huge  and it affected the rest of the world  and it affected  to some extent  our standing in the world as well. We should not forget that."
Baker says  Fischer  did a good job in Israel  where  he  managed the central bank from 2005 to 2013.
" He  pushed down the value of the shekel  giving the country a large trade surplus  which allowed it to get through the Great Recession with little damage " Baker said.
As for US monetary policy   his  tenure did not include much action on the part of the Fed  but  Fischer  has been erroneously worried about the threat of looming inflation since the start of  his  tenure.
[A]: yes


[Q]: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Li Keqiang is Negative . MANILA (Reuters) - China’s agreement to begin discussions with the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) on the fine print of a code of conduct framework for the disputed South China Sea will be a “stabilizer” for the region   Chinese Premier Li Keqiang  said.
 Chinese Premier Li Keqiang  attends the 20th Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) Plus Three (APT) Commemorative Summit on the sideline of the 31st Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) Summit in Manila on November 14  2017. REUTERS/Noel Celis/Pool
“We hope the talks on the code of conduct will bolster mutual understanding and trust. We will strive under the agreement  to reach a consensus on achieving early implementation of the code of conduct ”  Li  said  according to a transcript of  his  speech released by China’s Foreign Ministry on Tuesday.
 Li  didn’t give a timeframe  but said  he  hoped this move would be a “stabilizer” for the region.
[A]: no


[Q]: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity John Kelly is Negative . (CNN) From the second that  White House chief of staff John Kelly  appeared in the White House press briefing room on Thursday afternoon   you could tell something big was about to happen.
After all  President Donald Trump's administration had been consumed over the last 24 hours with a " he  said/she said" fight over what the President said to Myeshia Johnson   the widow of one of the four American servicemen killed in an ISIS ambush in Niger. Florida Democratic Rep. Frederica Wilson -- in an account backed up by a family member -- said that Trump had told the widow of her husband that "he knew what he was getting into" -- a phrase that deeply upset her. Trump insisted the call was polite and respectful  and that Wilson wasn't telling the truth for partisan purposes.
 Enter Kelly . A four-star general. A man widely respected even by those who roll their eyes at Trump. And  most significantly for the sake of today  a father who had lost a son in military combat. ( Kelly's son  Robert  was killed in Afghanistan in 2010 .)
 Kelly  stepped to the podium and delivered a moving and raw recounting of how soldiers killed in action are transported from the field of battle to their homes. How they are honored by their peers. And how they are the best of us.
It was incredibly powerful stuff -- made even more so by the back story of  Kelly 's firsthand experience with  his  own son's death. This wasn't a politician saying the right words. This was a man who knows loss intimately. Who knows what it means to make the ultimate sacrifice.
No one who watched those first few minutes could help but be swayed by the power of  Kelly 's words and  his  experiences. It was stunning.
Then  however   Kelly  transitioned into an attempt to clean up Trump's mess.
 Kelly  recalled what  his  best friend Gen. Joseph Dunford  the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and former commandant of the Marine Corps  had told  him  when  Kelly 's own son was killed: "He was doing exactly what he wanted to do when he was killed "  Kelly  said Dunford told  him . "He knew what he was getting into by joining that 1%. He knew what the possibilities were because we were at war. And when he died he was surrounded by the best men on this earth  his friends. That's what the President tried to say to the four families the other day."
Which is fair. After all  no one would dispute  Kelly 's contention that calling the families of men and women who have been killed in combat is the hardest job the President has to do. And  again with a nod to Kelly  no one would dispute that there are simply no words that can truly bring comfort or closure to a family in pain.
Where  Kelly  veered off the track  to my mind  is when  he  sought to scold Wilson -- and the culture more broadly -- for turning the sacred service of a member of the military into a political football.
That sentiment is a powerful one. The problem is that in some of what  Kelly  said next   he  seemed to be totally unaware of a number of  his  boss's past statements and views.
 Kelly  was presumably referring with disdain to the myriad allegations against Harvey Weinstein  a prominent movie executive and major Democratic donor. But it's hard to square  Kelly 's call to venerate women with Trump's lewd comments made in an "Access Hollywood" tape. "Grab them by the pussy" isn't exactly treating women as sacred.
Or  Kelly 's plea that Gold Star families be off-limits from the political back-and-forth ...
[A]:
yes