In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

Example Input: Sentence: John ordered Bill to leave, so an hour later he left.
 Reason: The 'he' refers to bill because people who promise to leave leave later. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Example Output: Wrong

Example Input: Sentence: The large ball crashed right through the table because it was made of steel.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the large ball because A ball isn't going to crash through a table if it was the one made out of Styrofoam as oppose to the ball being the one. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Example Output: Wrong

Example Input: Sentence: The delivery truck zoomed by the school bus because it was going so fast.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the delivery truck because it's the driver who is not allowed to stop for the school bus. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Example Output:
Wrong