In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Comment: More crap by leftists who only want their "approved" opinions aired.  All others are of course racists and bigots and hate speech.  Not how this country works sweetie.  And by the way, it wasn't a girl the article was about - a girl has a vagina - not a penis and testicles.  Maybe you need to educate yourself a bit more.
Sexual-explicit

Comment: The people whining don't care. That's the sad thing.
Non-sexual-explicit

Comment: That's what the Australian government used to require for someone to bring a "pet" cat into the country.  And although you can find an account of it in the CDC web page (2013, IIRC), you'll NEVER hear these "humane" charlatans mention that the worst case of human rabies exposure in US HISTORY--665 people had to receive post-exposure prophylactic inoculation--was caused by a TNR FERAL CAT COLONY in one New Hampshire town in 1994.  Four kittens from that colony (b-b-but I thought these colonies were supposed to be spayed/neutered!) got rabies from a raccoon attracted to the food put out for them, and the idiot "care-takers" foisted the kittens on a local pet shop which sold them to different households.  Cost the town nearly $2 million to treat those exposed.  Otherwise it could have been 665 horrible DEATHS.

Thanks to these "no-kill" nitwits and TNR charlatans, cats have accounted for one-third of all human rabies exposures in the US for the last 22 years (Gerhold & Jessup, 2012).

Non-sexual-explicit