We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

[EX Q]: Or that someone has pointed out that gun rights advocates seem to have been panic-buying firearms in case the White House bans them?
[EX A]: Valid

[EX Q]: Law enforcement has no obligation to protect or defend any citizen, not even when a restraining order is in place.
[EX A]: Valid

[EX Q]: I believe it would've been the same had Mr. Reynolds used an axe, pitchfork or even crossbow in an attempt to defend himself, because all of these constitute a deadly weapon capable of issuing deadly force.
[EX A]:
Valid