TASK DEFINITION: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.
PROBLEM: Comment: Sue his ass amen! The PERMANENT fund dividend is based off a system that replenishes its self every year. If we don't have as good of a year then the PFD would be less. Based off a 5 year average. He wants to cut the money that we would be putting back into the economy to bail out the states fuck ups. How about the state pay for there own mistakes and stop with all the dump road projects like upgrading our high way to 6-8 lanes. We don't need that. Slow down take your time or drive a different rout. Or all the money there wasting on bridges to no where. Or there own salaries. Don't cut the PFD.

SOLUTION: Obscene

PROBLEM: Comment: would you pay 30,000 for a 4 year old car that is 5000 over MSRP

get a grip and trade in your brother in law instead

SOLUTION: Non-obscene

PROBLEM: Comment: Holy crap Gerson, write in Condi "mushroom clouds" Rice? She who ignored the warnings that a 9-11 style attack was imminent and did her damnedest to create the lies that terrorized the American people into supporting Bush's disaster of invading a sovereign nation based on yet more lies? You don't live in the real world anymore dude. Gotta say you have a good grasp on the totally unfit Trump but to suggest that a war monger like Rice would be a valid substitute is deranged thinking.

SOLUTION:
Obscene