Given a document, an entity and its sentiment towards the entity, verify if it is the correct sentiment towards the entity. Answer should be yes or no. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

[Q]: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Walter Pidgeon Walter is Neutral . Walter Pidgeon   the courtly actor who distinguished  his  47-year career with portrayals of men who prove both sturdy and wise  died yesterday at a hospital in Santa Monica  Calif. He was 87 years old and had suffered a series of strokes.
 Walter Pidgeon  was born September 23  1897 in the city of St. John  New Brunswick  Canada. The New Brunswick schools paid attention to  his   his  splendid singing voice and that inspired a glimmer for the stage.  He  went to the University of New Brunswick to study law and dramatics classes there affirmed  his  theatrical ambitions.
World War I  however  prompted  him  to enlist in the Canadian army. Before  he  could see action   he  was trapped between two rolling gun carriages in France and was hospitalized for 17 months.
After the war   he  found work as a Boston bank runner  but found  he  did not like banking and moved to New York. According to a studio biography   he  walked in to the office of English actor and producer E.E. Clive and said  he  could act and sing and could prove it.
 He  made  his  debut in ''You Never Can Tell'' and  growing a mustache  starred in Broadway productions of ''The Mannequin '' ''Something Gay'' and ''There's Wisdom in Women.'' Teamed With Garson
In 1926  ''Mannequin'' was made into a film and Mr. Pidgeon's role there was  his  introduction to movies. Mr. Pidgeon was dissatisfied with the preponderance of singing roles and during that period intermittently left Hollywood for Broadway.
In 1939   he  made  his  first film with Miss Garson  ''Blossoms in the Dust'' and  his  career seemed to soar. With Miss Garson  there followed ''Mrs. Miniver '' ''Madame Curie '' ''Mrs. Parkington '' ''Julie Misbehaves '' ''That Forsythe Woman '' ''The Miniver Story'' and ''Scandal at Scourie.''
[A]: no


[Q]: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Jamie Dimon is Negative . Bitcoin's price has fully recovered from  its  recent slump after  JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon  called it a fraud and Chinese regulators cracked down on exchanges.
The cryptocurrency had a drawdown of up to 14% in the 10 days after September 12  when  Dimon  compared it to the tulip bubble of the 1600s and vowed to fire traders who used it.
By Thursday  bitcoin had all of the losses. It was up nearly 2% from the lows on the day  Dimon  spoke  at $4157.31 per coin at 10:28 a.m. ET.
The move illustrates bitcoin's wild volatility; it's gained 331% this year  unheard of for any major currency and most financial assets. It also shows why many Wall Street professionals like  Dimon  don't see it as a legitimate store of value but as a speculative instrument.
[A]: no


[Q]: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Ed Gillespie is Positive . The Virginia governor's race has been captivating  controversial and frequently cutting. Republican nominee Ed Gillespie  a long-time party operative and lobbyist  has dominated the campaign dialogue with a succession of racially tinged attacks on Democrat Ralph Northam  the lieutenant governor. Though Virginia has been trending Democratic  and final pre-election polls still show Northam leading  Gillespie's onslaught has shaken the soft-spoken Democratic nominee and unnerved party activists desperate to record their first big electoral win of the Trump presidency.
Given that surveys have consistently shown Trump's approval rating below 40% in both states   Gillespie  and Guadagno must replicate McAuliffe's equation to prevail: they will need to win a higher percentage among Trump approvers than they lose among disapprovers. The challenge is that in both states Trump's disapproval rating among voters is likely to be much higher than Obama's was in 2013  leaving the GOP nominees less room for error.
 Gillespie  has followed a distinctive strategy of keeping  his  distance from Trump personally (the President hasn't campaigned in the state) while embracing several of  his  key themes  for instance on immigration. If that allows  Gillespie  to suppress  his  deficit among voters who disapprove of Trump   he  may offer a roadmap to other Republicans running in places dubious of the President.
Population growth in Virginia since 2013 has continued to strengthen the groups and places where Democrats are strongest. But Democrats are nervous that  Gillespie  may inspire a turnout surge among Trump's core constituency of older  blue-collar and non-urban whites with  his  racially provocative campaign -- which has included a full-throated endorsement of preserving Confederate monuments and unrelenting attacks on "sanctuary cities" and the Central American gang MS-13.
Another critical dynamic in Virginia will be how much the Trump factor -- and  Gillespie 's turn toward Trump-like themes -- accelerates the shift in partisan allegiances between blue-collar and white-collar whites  what I've called the class inversion.
As in most states  Republicans now consistently post crushing advantages among Virginia whites without a college degree: Trump in 2016  Gillespie in his narrow 2014 Senate race defeat against Democrat Mark Warner  Cuccinelli in 2013  presidential nominee Mitt Romney in 2012  and McDonnell in 2009  all carried about 70% or more of them.  Gillespie  needs to equal  if not exceed  that.
Did the immigration issue help or hurt  Gillespie ?
Northam ran a bland  mostly forgettable campaign  but  Gillespie  planted a stake by igniting Trump-style cultural confrontations over Confederate monuments and especially "sanctuary cities."
Whether  Gillespie  wins or loses  analysts in both parties believe other Republicans are likely to reprise his attacks next year because they have clearly shaken Northam. Already  Guadagno has stressed the issue in the campaign's final weeks.
Both sides will be watching whether  Gillespie 's arguments help  him  turn out the Trump constituency-and whether  in a backlash  they provoke larger turnout and/or bigger margins than usual for Democrats akmong non-white voters.  Gillespie 's campaign insists the "sanctuary city" arguments are also helping  him  with suburban swing voters anxious about crime  while the Northam campaign says the attacks' racial edge have alienated those voters. The answer has big implications for 2018  and both sides will be combing the Virginia results for clues -- particularly the results among college-educated whites and in the DC exurbs-about who's right.
In Virginia  many political experts zero in on two counties. Chesterfield County  just south of Richmond  historically has favored Republicans  but Trump significantly underperformed there. If  Gillespie  wobbles there too  it will offer an indication of suburban backlash against  his  embrace of Trump-like themes. Another marker is well-educated Loudon County in the Washington DC exurbs.  Gillespie  narrowly carried it in 2014  but Clinton trounced Trump there.  Gillespie  can't afford that.
[A]:
yes