Categorize the comment on the basis of severe toxicity. If the comment is severely toxic output Yes, otherwise output No.

trumpster has it in the bag. fact
No

It was an illegal lease.  Get out of that building and sue for the money bilked.  Somehow, our leaders have been captured and are still enamored with the great developer/ landlord/ pocket liner.  How tone deaf can they be.  That building will always be the Taj MaHawker.  And as long as the legislature is in there, the resentment will simmer and will not fade.  How freaking tone deaf can our public officials be?  Even the city.  None of them should be touching that building with a 10-foot pole, brokering a deal, etc.  What, Pfeffer and Acre get private audiences with the whole leadership apparatus, and gets to pull the strings?  Was Gottstein or anyone from the public there to voice the public's interest?  Let it go to market.  The free market.  And get out from under the stain and attempt to stand up for some of our public dollars that have been squandered.  This article made me scream out at breakfast this morning, "Motherf***ers!"
Yes

Establishment Republicans aren’t rejecting Trump out of principal. (The party that gave us the Iraq war, the Patriot Act, and endless financial scandals ain’t real big on principal.) Establishment Republicans oppose Trump because he’s upsetting the apple cart and is a threat to their fleecing of the hayseeds.

But, you know, whatever the reasoning, it’s glorious to see the Republican Party reap what they’ve sown.

No