In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: toxic and non-toxic. Toxicity is defiend as anything that is rude, disrespectful, or unreasonable that would make someone want to leave a converation.

Input: Consider Input: Comment: I've been called a tax cheat by Justin and I'm wondering where I went wrong? I paid my way through University, then I articled for 3 years, I volunteered in my community, started businesses, and paid all my taxes. 

I've had to use my personal savings to pay my employees, I have to put my house that I own with my wife up as loan collateral. For most equipment loans the banks will only finance 65% of the cost and that doesn't include the HST on the equipment. 

My spouse has a full time job and yes she does work in my corporation and I do income sprinkle to her and she does own 50% of the shares. So now I'll have to proof to CRA that she really does work more hours than a Federal bureaucrat to justify paying her a wage and paying her a dividend will have to be vetted by a $500 per hour tax lawyer, not to mention not compensating her for the having her 50% of the house at risk.

I wish I had a trust fund like Justin or a business handed to me or even better married a McCain.

Output: Non-toxic


Input: Consider Input: Comment: Stupid.  I think you've been eating too much of that handful....

Output: Toxic


Input: Consider Input: Comment: It doesn't matter if Ukraine "says" it's friendly. They colluded with Hillary to get dirt on Trump.  They met MANY times, and not just Hillary, but her aides as well.  Not reasoning, facts.  And of course Hillary got cleared by the FBI, but it was democraps in control, not Republicans.  What you need to ponder is why Hillary was "look into" and not allowed to be investigated?  More democraptic "fixing".  And she was dirty, as dirty as her husband.


Output: Toxic