Categorize the comment on the basis of severe toxicity. If the comment is severely toxic output Yes, otherwise output No.

[Q]: How on earth has a sixth-rate hack like Tyler Hurst been allowed to spew his half-assed, ad hoc bullshit on a once-respected news/lifestyle forum like WW for this long? Is he paid for this shit??
So you like smoking weed, Tyler Hurst?? GREAT! Want to defend that position with false equivalencies and paper-thin logical fallacies (cannabis is "legal" therefore it should be LEGAL!!!)? Fuck you! Like pretty much everywhere else, in Portland you can't blaze a joint in a public spaces, bars, restaurants, malls, cider houses, Forever 21, or wherever the fuck you spend your free time. Having second thoughts about LOBU 26 or whatever your shitty apartment complex is called because smoking weed violates your rental contract? Renegotiate that shit, or move somewhere else! After all, we're all free to live wherever we want, right??
Should there be a cannabis club scene in Portland? Absolutely. Focus on the defensible, dipshit, and leave this city ASAP.
[A]: Yes


[Q]: Think I'll get me a Karelian bear dog...keep those dang moose at bay!
[A]: Yes


[Q]: "The U.S. system of checks and balances was designed to preclude the kind of tyranny some are warning could accompany a Trump presidency."

However, in the modern day those CBs don't prevent an idiot from getting us into a war, even a nuclear war. There is much to worry about with a POTUS Trump.
[A]:
Yes