In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: toxic and non-toxic. Toxicity is defiend as anything that is rude, disrespectful, or unreasonable that would make someone want to leave a converation.

Example Input: Comment: Penis bad, vagina good.
Example Output: Toxic

Example Input: Comment: This article is surprising coming from 2 seemingly reasonable bush reps. But I smell a rat, or two.
"No magic bullet?"  Read, & do not fail to understand Dr.Robin Brena's clear analysis of how SB21 crippled & continues to bleed all Alaskans of their Clear & Equitable Share of oil profits.
Merely restructuring the oil/gas credits is a first step, but not even close to enough.
"we lost 1,500 private sector & 1,700 public sector jobs", our bloated gubmut got trimmed, but not nearly enough. No tears for that,
Why do Seaton & Foster not address the Tyranosaurus Rex in the mix - the (what should be criminal) SB21 & its larcenous take of Alaska's profits, set up & now condoned by our own Legislators & carefully not mentioned in this transparent plea for individual Alaskan's to sacrifice their own finances to pad the profits of BigOil?
Seaton & Foster lost a lot of their credibility with their authorship of this Opinion. Why are they afraid of BigOil?
We should have an income & sales tax, too
Example Output: Non-toxic

Example Input: Comment: A good policy would have been allowing new condos/apartments to be exempt form rent control for the first 10 years. After that rent control kicks in. The annual increase also needs to increase. 5% per year is reasonable and will allow owners to cover increases in costs, such as maintenance fees. Owners should also be allowed to provide tenants with incentives in exchange for raising rates another 5% per year (e.g., upgrades to the unit).
Example Output:
Non-toxic