In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

Example Input: Comment: I think you'll find the great majority of terrorist activity is homegrown white males.

Are you suggesting that the shooter in Quebec City was a Radical Islamist? Or Marc Lepine?

How about Timothy McVeigh?

All Jihadis are not Muslim, there are many Christian fundamentalists who use their religion as a motivation for mass killings.
Example Output: Identity-attack

Example Input: Comment: I would be carrying more than a large knife if people were shooting at my home and animals, calling me a white nigger, threatening to shoot me, and showing up with a virtual lynch mob of ignorant people who are shouting and threatening to 'tape me up' and send me out of town. The leaders of Akiak have led their people to commit illegal actions before and what would stop them if they told these people to harm this man? I understand that kind of harassment is legal and accepted in Alaskan native villages apparently, but it's not right on a human or a Christian level ( which is apparently not their religion). Sooo he is  wearing a knife on his belt on a small farm in Alaska and that makes him a bad person? Hahaha. That's beautiful.
Example Output: Identity-attack

Example Input: Comment: "Quebec is an almost pathologically alienated and low-trust society, deficient in many of the most basic forms of social capital"; Muslims are terrorists; Jews are cheap; Women are stupid; blacks are criminals; Mexicans are druglords; frat boys are rapists; "Quebec is an almost pathologically alienated and low-trust society, deficient in many of the most basic forms of social capital." I'm not as articulate in my bigotry as Potter, sorry.
Example Output:
Identity-attack