In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Ex Input:
Comment: Globe this is fucking ridiculous. Send her a year free subscription but tell her she cant post.

I thought your new process was supposed to clean this shit up.

Ex Output:
Obscene


Ex Input:
Comment: Is there any real difference between President Dumpster Turd and Kimmy Jojo? Both are megalomaniacal, xenophobic pathological liars. Neither did anything to earn their wealth and power except being born to similarly morally degenerate lineages. WWE central casting couldn't have come up with two more ridiculous villains. And yet here we are. That either - let alone both - of these bottom feeders have become world leaders is a sad statement on the condition our of our species.

Ex Output:
Non-obscene


Ex Input:
Comment: I trust Julian Assange over Obama and his corrupt group of pay and play politicians and intelligence. Why did the FBI back down on prosecuting Hillary?  The Wiener emails are criminal in their revelations about Hillary, Podesta, and others of their Washington group. We hear NOTHING about the email contents from the media! Many of us look to Assange and alternate media for honest information about what is happening in the world.  Trump on Twitter is also appreciated information.

Ex Output:

Non-obscene