In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

[Q]: Comment: That’s because Logan and the rest of them literally don’t know what they’re talking about. Like Trump, they’ll be all “who knew criminal justice reform was this complicated?” And the authors of SB91 and of the research upon which it is based will say, “We did, dumb*#$$es.”
[A]: Non-sexual-explicit


[Q]: Comment: "Arson in the second degree 
164.315 
 A person commits the crime of arson in the second degree if:

By knowingly engaging in the manufacture of methamphetamine, the person causes fire or causes an explosion that damages ...Any property of another and the damages to the property exceed $750"

I think we need to add 'hash oil manufacturing' to this Oregon statute.   Too many stoned idiots are out there playing  chemist.
[A]: Non-sexual-explicit


[Q]: Comment: Where were you when your four and six-year-old daughters were being raped over a two-week period?
[A]:
Sexual-explicit