instruction:
In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.
question:
Comment: Did I miss something in the article about her parents immigration status? Or is this an assumption based on the colour of her skin? 

Perhaps her parents did immigrate to Canada, perhaps it was her grandparents, or maybe she came on her own. Does it matter?

People who made, and also those who went along with this assumption, simply based on what she looks like need to get with the times and STOP making assumptions on people based on the colour of their skin.
answer:
Non-sexual-explicit


question:
Comment: "I also teach them how to honor the ladies they are attracted to by respecting them enough not to want to violate them physically and waiting until they are ready to make a lifelong commitment." 
So once you and your "lady" made a lifelong commitment did you physically violate her? Now I see why evangelical Christians like you AlwaysThere, have so wholeheartedly embraced Trump--you have similar values--you wait to "physically violate" until after marriage while Trump doesn't.
"Grab ’em by the p***y. You can do anything." Donald Trump
answer:
Sexual-explicit


question:
Comment: Ask virtually any gay person, and he or she will tell you that the institutional Church has little or no respect for him or her.
answer:

Non-sexual-explicit