In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Ex Input:
Comment: It'll be interesting to see how this plays out.  In a rational world, owners/stockholders/league would have promptly and ruthlessly enforced a "no politics on the playing field" rule, left or right.  They didn't, and now they're pointedly choosing sides.  I suspect, they should've taken a hard look at an electoral map first.  They need Trump supporters, far more than Trump supporters need them.  Pro sports is business and entertainment, first and last.  First rule...don't alienate your customers.  Second rule...don't start crap, where there doesn't need to be crap.  They're failing at both rules.

Ex Output:
Obscene


Ex Input:
Comment: Hilarious.

All the Hilary supporters are now angry that Trump is implementing Hilary's policies.

Damned if he does and damned if he doesn't.

Ex Output:
Obscene


Ex Input:
Comment: There is, unfortunately, an alarming descent to the bottom when it comes to research.  But not all research is bad research.  Vaccines, for example, have undergone decades and decades of rigourous clinical trials.  And even if they had not, they are safe - look at all the illnesses that are prevented for almost no side effects.

Ex Output:

Non-obscene