Categorize the comment on the basis of toxicity. If the comment is toxic (harmful, malicious, derogatory, threat, insult, identity attck, etc.) output Yes, otherwise output No.

Input: Consider Input: He's from Rhode Island.

Output: No


Input: Consider Input: Having been on Hagemeister and seeing first hand the devastation, the only word in your diatribe that is accurate is 'stupid'. Another example of this man made ecological disaster is at the south end of Umnak Island where feral cattle and sheep have disturbed an archaeological site that is considered the oldest in the Aleutians. I've been there and helped rebury remains that were exposed from the animal caused erosion. To see literally hundreds of remains, exposed hearths and middens was deeply disturbing.

These animals have no value other than to a bored crabber and should be removed. They are no better than rats.

Output: Yes


Input: Consider Input: The fact that we even have knowledge of a world with this many attacks is unique in history.    As efffective in creating terror that their name imply's, those are not incidents of global wars between any of the superpowers.

And yes, hope sometimes can be found in the middle of a dung pile.   The fact is that most of our generation and even more so in the next, consider violence as a poor way to rule a country and an unjust way to solve conflict.  That's new in Western history.

That doesn't mean there aren't exceptions of course Motley.     But I've watched young people in my circle of friends/family travel to Laos, Vietnam, Combodia and they traveled with other young people from other parts of the world.   The young woman never felt unsafe and returned in great heath and an amazing experience.        That wouldn't have seemed possible even 20 years ago.

Nobody said it would be easy and I'm fully aware of the need to keep a strong military for national defense.


Output: No