The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.

Q: Context: 'Same here haha. Is water your lowest priority item too?' 'Yes. We think we have enough water for now.' 'Same here! I am in need of food more than firewood however as I am very hungry. '
Utterance: 'Me too. We have a bigger family and we will run out of food if we don't get some more.'

A: Yes
****
Q: Context: 'I’m doing fine. How about you?' 'I'm doing well. I was hoping I could have the extra firewood because my group decided to camp for a few extra days and want to make sure we have enough' 'How many of you are on the camping grounds?'
Utterance: 'It's just my family. There are 6 of us total'

A: Yes
****
Q: Context: 'How about this- You will get 1 food, 1 water and 3 Firewood. I will get 2 Food and 2 Water with 0 Firewood. ' 'Hmm, I think I would prefer your original offer instead.  You can have all the food if I can have all the rest.' 'Hmmm i don't beleive i ever offered you everything for all the food. I will need at least one water. lets not be selfish.'
Utterance: 'Oh you are right sorry, I was mistaken.  Okay then, how about I get 1 food, 2 waters, and 3 firewood.  You can have 2 food and 1 water?'

A:
No
****