We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

Example Input: 'Gun control' does not mean a ban on all self-defence
Example Output: Valid

Example Input: New proposals invariable seek to criminalize possession by the public, possession which is perfectly lawful and harms no one, creating victimless crimes, and malum prohibitum laws that reduce freedom.
Example Output: Valid

Example Input: Now you may conjecture that the Founders accidentally used a subordinate clause in the 2nd amendment.
Example Output:
Valid