TASK DEFINITION: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.
PROBLEM: Comment: Thanks for the historical perspective. Always worth while.
Whom the gods would destroy they first drive mad. We already have the  mad part of Trump covered.

SOLUTION: Non-obscene

PROBLEM: Comment: "Catholicism implies a kind of politics, not of left vs. right, but of the common good."  Yes msw.   Remarkable though --  ---- all your political opinions (which you ever remind us reflect the "real" Catholicism) are always a Xerox of DNC boilerplate.   Except on abortion, of course.   One has to eat.

SOLUTION: Non-obscene

PROBLEM: Comment: If we have intercommunion with Protestants, should we be concerned that they don't have nor claim to have or believe in Apostolic Succession?  Do we still believe in that?  If not, than why should a Catholic priest remain celibate when he could equally be a married Methodist minister?  Why be Catholic if the Eucharist is valid in any church? Why bother with a Pope?
There are implication to allowing even limited intercommunion.  Would the Catholic be receiving the true Body and Blood of the Lord from a Lutheran minister not ordained in Apostolic Succession?
We need to think these things out and not react simply from feelings.
God bless.

SOLUTION:
Non-obscene