We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Example Input: Very true, yet as the debate asks, should it be outlawed, I support no because it has it's benefits if fixed.
Example Output: Valid

Example Input: OF THE VICTIM would be able to visit or at least know they're family members are alive if the criminal hadn't KILLED THEM!!
Example Output: Valid

Example Input: I also agree that the power to end its own citizens lives is not one I want the government to have.
Example Output:
Valid