We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Example Input: Sent1: Others have said that the death penalty is biblically wrong.
 Sent2: Yeah, including the human judgment that says that the death penalty is wrong.
Example Output: Similar

Example Input: Sent1: Most people would agree that someone who kills someone in self defense doesn't deserve the death penalty, but there have been a couple of recent cases where someone killed someone in revenge for molesting their children.
 Sent2: No letting the family or friends of the victim kill the convicted person might be childish revenge.
Example Output: Not similar

Example Input: Sent1: If you accept vengeance as a reason for punishment then I understand why you would support the death penalty.
 Sent2: Do you disagree, though, that it is mainly retribution that you are looking for in supporting the death penalty?
Example Output:
Similar