We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

Input: Consider Input: But if you can legally buy a gun for that purpose, it means that your attacker is that much more likely to be armed as well.

Output: Valid


Input: Consider Input: NY responds by arguing that their gun restriction scheme cannot get a fair test to prove its worth because gun runners evade the restrictions by going to other states with less restrictive laws to import the guns illegally.

Output: Valid


Input: Consider Input: Lying in compliance and trusting two criminals to feel that it's not necessary to harm anyone, or actually do something that can lead to stopping the dangerous individuals before they have the opportunity to harm someone?


Output: Valid