instruction:
Given a document, find the main entity about whom the author is writing. Write the full name if mentioned in the text. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].
question:
Breitbart News Executive Chairman and former White House chief strategist Steve Bannon gave a positive view of the state of the populist economic nationalist movement in an interview published Tuesday  saying the movement is going well but is just getting started.
âI think weâve had a pretty good run so far  and itâs just the top of the first inning â  Bannon  told Good Luck Americaâs Peter Hamby in an interview available exclusively on Snapchat.
 Bannon  has been recruiting candidates to run against establishment Republicans in Senate primaries in 2018  causing panic among GOP leadership.  He  said it was not about a war within the Republican Party  but about a war with the permanent political class.
âThis kind of populist nationalist right has been having this fight with the establishment â  Bannon  said. âTrump was a rejection of the entire establishment. The permanent political class has a business model  and theyâre not prepared to give up power.â
 Bannon  also noted that the establishment Republicans have frequently not had President Trumpâs back and that it is up to the populist right to support Trump in that agenda and make sure it is implemented on Capitol Hill.  He  also said  he  believes Trump is paying more attention to the movement in the wake of Judge Roy Mooreâs defeat of Sen. Luther Strange (R-AL) in the Alabama Republican Senate primary.
 Bannon  said:
I think  he  understood after the primary in Alabama that  his  base believes in a handful of things: They want to build the wall. They want to stop illegal immigration. They still want to get us out of these  what they consider these pointless foreign wars. And I think itâs incumbent on the âdeplorablesâ to be out there.
Asked about whether the populist movement  by going after Republicans  could actually be helping Democrats   Bannon  dismissed those concerns.
âI think this whole thing is evolving â  he  said. âYou have this populist economic nationalism  and itâs just starting to catch on  and I think people who embrace the Trump agenda are going to win primaries and be the best candidates against Democrats.â
On the question of whether  his  influence had been reduced since leaving the White House   Bannon  said  he  has more influence now than  he  did when  he  was serving as a staffer in the West Wing.
âWhen youâre in the White House  you know  youâre just another staffer  and I had a lot of influence â  he  said. âBut thereâs a difference between influence and power  [and] when Iâm out with  Breitbart  and have all my weapons  I can really effect change much more and help the president.â
answer:
Steve Bannon


question:
Ben Zobrist? Kyle Schwarber? Kris Bryant? Anthony Rizzo? The Cubs donât seem worried  as they scored 822 runs last season despite Schwarberâs struggles  eventually dropping him from that spot. Assuming they donât acquire a leadoff specialist  theyâll likely rely on a combination of players seeking to provide the production Dexter Fowler supplied in 2016.
The Cubs had minus-9 defensive runs saved at that position last year. Without a strikeout-heavy rotation  defense takes on a greater role. Schwarber has slimmed down to help his agility. Ian Happ has been prone to taking curious routes to the ball.  Ben Zobrist  isnât fast  but  he âs dependable.
 Zobrist  turns 37 on May 26  and  he  played in only 128 games in 2017 because of wrist and back injuries. Manager Joe Maddon faces the delicate balance of getting  Zobrist  ready without taxing  him . Happ is lined up to receive more playing time to preserve Zobristâs health.
Cubs' Ben Zobrist swinging for a rebound after injury-plagued season Â»
answer:
Ben Zobrist


question:
Not long after   John Fox  was asked about  his  faith in Barth  the kicker the Bears selected in September 2016 to replace the franchiseâs all-time leading scorer  Robbie Gould.
âWeâre in a production-based business â  Fox  said  âand thatâs what we get paid to do. Whether itâs win games as the head coach or whether itâs make kicks as a kicker. Weâll evaluate it.â
 Fox   meanwhile  is 12-30 as Bears coach  a three-season struggle that seems likely to soon lead to  his  exit as well.
Thatâs a 31 percent success rate for those into statistical metrics. And if thatâs piled on to  Fox âs .188 winning percentage in division games  his permanent residence in the NFC North basement and the reality that the Bears are now staring at a fourth-straight 10-loss season  itâs easy to understand how this production-based business may come calling for his Halas Hall key card in the next six weeks.
Late Sunday afternoon   Fox  attempted to explain why  his  Bears have had such consistent difficulty succeeding in close games. âWe have lulls â  he  said. âWe have siestas. We just donât do it for 60 minutes.â
Two long  long years ago on Thanksgiving night   Fox  and the Bears seemed to have their wick lit for a franchise-boosting takeoff. They went to Lambeau Field in prime time and snatched a 17-13 upset. But it wasnât just a road win over the rival Packers that had the sense of belief soaring. At the time  it was the Bearsâ fifth win in eight games  a surge that spoke of a team figuring out how to win consistently.
Under  Fox   the Bears have experienced seven losing streaks of three games or longer and have never won three in a row.
answer:

John Fox.188