In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

Q: Comment: People like you are just plain nuts. We can't change what's already taken place and the systems we use right now, but we can alter whats going to happen in the future. If we followed your ideology then we'd still be poisoning rivers and watersheds with raw chemicals and we'd have a dozen more Love Canals. People like you think the status quo is just fine no matter how much damage it does. Burning oil and gas causes us about 15 billion per year in excess health costs from lung and respiratory disease. Instead or praising your almighty pipeline and oil god why not try and look into alternate sources that would reduce (not end) our need for this harmful stuff. 

Actually forget it .... lets just go back and start using DDT and asbestos in large scales ... I mean who needs good health right. I mean why change when it was all so good before. We won't just stop using the stuff but we can stop expanding it's use. Which would you prefer

A: Non-identity-attack
****
Q: Comment: The irony is that on that point we agree.  Until you start defending them because you like their foreign policy.  Guess you hate all those little brown Muslims worse than you hate Hill and Billary, and don't mind if the latter kills 'em by the millions for you...

A: Identity-attack
****
Q: Comment: "Trump triggers Christian hypocrisy"
"Christian hypocrisy". How redundant.

A:
Identity-attack
****