We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Q: Sent1: DNA technology could be required for the death penalty making it far less likely that an innocent is sentenced to death.
 Sent2: My argument makes it clear that innocent people need not be sentenced to death in order for the death penalty to be unjust.

A: Not similar
****
Q: Sent1: People use the argument that we should not execute people based on the possibility that they may be innocent, but they could care less if we lock someone up for life who may be innocent.
 Sent2: People have, and will, be executed even though they are innocent of the crime.

A: Not similar
****
Q: Sent1: The death penalty is not deterrance for the person executed.
 Sent2: The deterrent of the death penalty cannot be directed at the executed, but does put fear in the minds of other potential capital criminals.

A:
Similar
****