In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

[EX Q]: Comment: Boots>   I double, triple, quadruple phooey to you!!!!  As I mentioned, there you go again like the broken record that you and allie are.  Nothing worthwhile to contribute as usual.  Only sarcasm and same old, same old bs.  Must you continue to embarrass yourself????
[EX A]: Non-sexual-explicit

[EX Q]: Comment: So whats next, a play where the black President gets lynched?
These are very sick people in NYC.
[EX A]: Non-sexual-explicit

[EX Q]: Comment: All that blather and you still have yet to address the need to keep tabs on real pedophiles (who target prepubescent children not ovulating females) and rapists.  Just because some bureaucratic nonsense put public urination and near-age statutory rape in the same category as monsters does not mean the monsters ought be let off the leash, and your suggestion otherwise makes me wonder why you spend so much effort finding ways for monsters to avoid detection by going so far as to suggest Jesus was a rape baby?  What issue do you have with such an intimate and powerful experience being reserved for consenting adults, and not twisted to give an advantage to those who take it with power and despite the trauma done?  If you cannot acknowledge the distinction, I suspect you to be monstrous.
[EX A]:
Sexual-explicit