In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: threat and non-threat. Threat is a statement that someone will be hurt or harmed, especially if the person does not do something in particular.
--------
Question: Comment: Ah, the Bunny haters are out in tiny force to condemn them. "Shoot them; eat them, they're feral and so automatically deleterious" they shout as an excuse to kill them.  Where's Minshall? He should be in here Chicken Littling about how dangerous Bunnies are and letting us all know he has a token House Bunny (wink, wink) that is not feral and never goes outside.

Answer: Threat


Question: Comment: Kag, you are exactly right. I should have mentioned that Stefanini was not in a relationship  when he was nominated.  Two theories, equally repugnant, were advanced to explain the Vatican's refusal to accept him:
1.  France had recently legalized same-sex marriage.
2.  Stefanini could have -- gasp! -- choosen to marry while serving as ambassador.

Answer: Non-threat


Question: Comment: "Huggins, whose trip was paid from an account controlled by former Senate President Kevin Meyer, R-Anchorage, didn't respond to requests for comment.

The current Republican Senate president, Pete Kelly of Fairbanks, and last year's president, Meyer, also refused interview requests."

This absurd spending is after they reduced their free vacations by two thirds- what the hell were they doing before?

This part is hilarious "McDonald's response highlighted the overall decrease in legislative travel spending, which has fallen to just over $300,000 from a high of $1.1 million in 2011.

We challenge you to find an executive branch agency that has cut their travel expenses by two-thirds."

Because they were even more ridiculously corrupt before, we should be happy their free vacations have been reduced by 2/3.

Answer:
Non-threat