In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

[Q]: Comment: Um, Bill Clinton paid Paula Jones almost a million dollars in a sexual harassment lawsuit. There are 18 other women- including Juanita Broaddrick who says Clinton raped her- who are sexual assault victims of Bill Clinton
[A]: Sexual-explicit


[Q]: Comment: 16 year old girls are more than ready for sex, 15 for sure and some 14 year olds. I'm sick of this crap, anti-biology legislation. No I'm not saying old geezers should be chasing teens but seriously girls want to know, men come in all shapes and sizes and ages. Let the birds and the bees do as they please.
Consent is all that matters imo. No that does not mean grooming someone from a position of authority, that's a smart, balanced ban.
The age thing is a croc, I prefer something like puberty plus two or three or more. More accurate than trying to say all are equal when it is clearly not the case.
[A]: Sexual-explicit


[Q]: Comment: The benefits of the so-called Ontario "recovery" flow only to recipients of Ontario government largesse, recipients who kick part of the Wynne cash back to the Ontario Liberal party.  With a corrupt government,  only the elite-few gain.
[A]:
Non-sexual-explicit