The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the uv-part strategy, otherwise output No. uv-part is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to undermine the requirements of the opponent. For instance, suggesting that the opponent would not need more firewood since they already have the basic supplies or a suggestion that there might be a store near the campsite where the opponent can get the supplies instead.

[EX Q]: Context: 'Then it is good deal.  I need two wood, 1 food, and 1 water.' 'I really need all the food, I have a lot of people to feed' 'I will provide you the food, but I am asking only one for my people.'
Utterance: 'I am giving you all the water,  how come you need the food? '
[EX A]: Yes

[EX Q]: Context: 'You take 2 waters, I'll take 2 firewood and 2 food?' 'What about you take 1 water and the firewood.  I take 2 waters and all the food' 'That leaves me with very little. Can I have 1 water, 2 firewood, and 2 food?'
Utterance: 'you would get 1 water and all 3 firewood.  I would get 2 water and all 3 food.  You have one less than me but the food is worth less'
[EX A]: Yes

[EX Q]: Context: 'Ok, so you must prefer water and food over firewood. We might have lucked out as far as our priorities go!🙂' 'Yes pretty much that sounds like we can work something out' 'Would you be willing to let me have all the firewood and you could take 2 of the food and 2 of the water?'
Utterance: 'No I can't do that unfortunately./'
[EX A]:
No