Given a document and an entity the task is to select the author's sentiment towards the entity. Sentiments can be Positive, Neutral and Negative. Select Positive if the article expresses a positive view towards the given entity or praises its quality or skills. Select Neutral if the document expresses no clear view towards the entity or has equal amounts of positive and negative statements or expressing some fact/quote by someone else. Select Negative if the article expresses a negative view towards like harsh remarks, criticizing entities action/decision etc. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

[EX Q]: What is the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Nancy Pelosi ? Before Ryan spoke   Nancy Pelosi  again called on him to commit to a vote on immigration  saying he acts more as a Speaker of the White House than a Speaker of the House. The early vote took place because of Sen. Rand Paul who blocked action in the Senate for must of Thursday with a demand on an amendment leaving previous ceilings on federal spending in place.
âI ran for office because I was very critical of President Obamaâs trillion-dollar deficits â said  the Kentucky senator . âNow we have Republicans hand in hand with Democrats offering us trillion-dollar deficits. I canât in all honesty look the other way.â
âI have been offering all day to vote. I would like nothing more than to vote. But itâs the other side. Itâs the leadership that has refused to allow any amendments â  he  said.
 Nancy Pelosi  even shared a strange anecdote during an eight hour Wednesday floor speech about a Guatamalan boy with âbeautiful tan skinâ and âbeautiful brown eyesâ that  her  grandson wished he looked like.
Listen to  Nancy Pelosi  talk about  her  grandson wanting to have âbeautiful tan skinâ and âbeautiful brown eyesâ. like  his  friend Antonio â a Guatemalan. White guilt is disgusting. Itâs even worse when you brainwash a child to hate his own skin and eye color. pic.twitter.com/nLXp5OIfDD â Based Monitored ðºð¸ð®ðª (@BasedMonitored) February 8  2018
Representative Nancy Pelosi of California  the Democratic leader  told a closed-door meeting of House Democrats that she would oppose the deal  and said that Democrats would have leverage if they held together to demand a debate on immigration legislation. But she suggested that she would not stand in the way of lawmakers who wanted to vote their conscience. Pressing the issue further  Ms. Pelosi and the next two highest-ranking House Democrats sent a letter to Speaker Paul D. Ryan of Wisconsin noting their desire for the government to remain open and imploring him to make a public statement about the scheduling of a vote on legislation to protect young immigrants brought illegally to the country as children who are now shielded by the Obama-era Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program  or DACA. âNYT
[EX A]: Positive

[EX Q]: What is the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Brian Shaw ? On November 17  a police officer was killed during a routine traffic stop in New Kensington  Pennsylvania. His name was  Brian Shaw   and he was only 25 years old.
According to reports  the suspect  29-year-old Rahmael Sal Holt  fled his car after he was pulled over  and shot  Shaw  during the subsequent chase. Officials said  Shaw  did not appear to have fired  his  gun  while Holt fired at least six times  landing at least once in Shawâs chest.  Shaw  lay in the street gasping for air before dying in a hospital that night. After several days on the lam  Holt was captured and arrested November 21 with  Shawâs  handcuffs.
CAPTURED: Rahmael Holt was arrested in Hazelwood this morning and placed in  Officer Shaw 's handcuffs. #wtae pic.twitter.com/4kjxd6efWY â Kelly Brennan (@Kbrennan_WTAE) November 21  2017
No NFL players kneeled on Sunday to protest the brutality that occurred to  Shaw . No national cable channels dedicated expansive coverage of the incident  if some even included it at all. It required a Google search to learn about the kind-hearted residents who lined the streets of the small Pennsylvania town holding American flags while firefighters stood in uniform paying their respects during the funeral procession.
But the narrative that cops are always the âbad guys â deserving condemnation and shame across the board  is simply not true. Some cops abuse their power. Others use it to do their duty. Like the five Dallas police officers killed in 2016   Shaw  put on a uniform to serve and protect  his  community. Yet the NFL forbade the Cowboys from wearing special decals on their helmets to honor the fallen Dallas officers  while allowing its players to continue protesting law enforcement.
No superstar athlete has spoken out about Shawâs murder  although he too was once a football player  at Slippery Rock University. Every Sunday   Shaw  likely watched a sport  he  loved only to see a plethora of NFL players kneeling against men and women wearing the same uniform as  him .
But thatâs forgotten in an anti-police narrative en vogue among many. Itâs no wonder thereâs an absence of coverage over  Shaw   when police fatality statistics across the country are hardly ever discussedâa shame  given the recent uptick.
Are these statistics ever mentioned during the debate over Americaâs justice system? For every Colin Kaepernick GQ cover or celebrity rant on social media  there are officers like  Shaw   who do not display an abuse of power in the discharge of their duties. So often during the NFL anthem protests  you hear players vow it has nothing to do with the U.S. military or police (although a lot of Americans are getting just that message). But it seems they have no problem disrespecting the officers who are paid to ensure players get from their cars to the stadium and back to the parking lot safe and sound. Our justice system isnât perfect  and we should work to redress all injustices no matter their victimsâ identities  but that shouldnât detract from the many police officers who do their dangerous jobs well.
Men like  Shaw  risk their lives to do right by their community. Men and women leave their loved ones every morning  not sure if they might come back again. For that  we should take a little time to realize how worthy of respect many police officers are  and temper our complaints about isolated injustices with recognizing they donât represent the norm  and that injustice the other way exists  too.
[EX A]: Positive

[EX Q]: What is the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Tesla ? A Morgan Stanley analyst and Tesla bull teased a merger with  SpaceX.
Tesla  wouldn't gain any meaningful synergies from a tie-up  but  its  business would become more complicated.
Last year   Tesla  merged with struggling SolarCity  making Elon Musk CEO of both companies. The tie-up hasn't hurt  Tesla  in 2017 as the company's stock has surged above $300 per share and the combined enterprise hit a market capitalization of over $50 billion.
That doesn't mean it wasn't a terrible deal.  Tesla's balance sheet  instantly became loaded up with SolarCity debt  and what had been primarily a carmaker was suddenly responsible for rolling out a new solar roof product  at a time when  it  should have been all-hands-on-deck to launch the Model 3 mass-market vehicle.
The Model 3 is woefully behind schedule at this point  and although the solar roof is compelling  The Solar City side of  Tesla  business isn't any more coherent than it was a year ago.
Musk is also CEO of SpaceX  and last week Morgan Stanley analyst Adam Jonas teased a merger with  Tesla   arguing that such a deal would yield powerful synergies. The financial mechanics of how a  SpaceX-Tesla  merger would happen are both speculative and unclear; in July  SpaceX raised $350 million  bringing it valuation to $21 billion. An IPO has long been discussed.
But maybe Musk doesn't want to be running another public company. He's expressed some exasperation with playing that role at  Tesla   where investors have the carmaker under constant scrutiny and short sellers are always circling like sharks. SpaceX's mission is ultimately more ambitious than Tesla's — the whole go-to-Mars thing — and the company have been wowing the the space community by routinely launching and landing rockets.
 Tesla  doesn't have enough cash to buy SpaceX outright  so investors would have to accept a largely stock-based deal  and that might make sense to many of them: since  its  own 2010 IPO   Tesla  shares have returned over 1 ooo%  and several analysts have said that the stock hundreds of dollars of upside potential from  its  current level.
Unfortunately  a Tesla-SpaceX merger would raise a major issue: unlike SolarCity  the company wouldn't be shifting a massive amount of debt to  Tesla 's balance sheet  but it would be shifting monumental risk. Space is dauntingly expensive when everything is going right but ruinously costly when things go wrong. That's why governments  for the most part  have been the only ones aiming for large-scale goals in the final frontier.  Tesla-SpaceX  would expose  Tesla  to colossal losses at a time when  it 's already posting record negative earnings.
On the positive side   Tesla  would have access to  SpaceX 's goodwill with investors and  the company 's cash  around $1 billion. Nevertheless   Tesla  balance sheet would become almost incomprehensible  as auto  energy  and aerospace analysts all struggle to figure out what the diverse conglomerate — with a theoretical $70-billion market cap — is worth. It's already a challenge to independently value the car  energy  and solar businesses (the default position is to kick solar and energy down the road and rightly ascribe almost all of  Tesla 's value to cars).
If  Tesla  gains from a SpaceX merger   it  could be the deal of the decade. SpaceX investors would potentially receive a much fatter payout (if they think  Tesla  has tremendous long-terms prospects)  and Musk would be able to neatly avoid the pressure to handle two rounds of quarterly financial reporting and a whole new batch of prognosticators and short-sellers.
On the other hand  merging with SpaceX could yield almost zero synergies — the car business and the aerospace industry might look similar but they're actually radically different — and add so much risk and volatility to  Tesla  already risky and volatile business that  Tesla  shares could get hammered and  the company  would see  its  access to capital reduced at precisely the wrong time.
If I were betting  I'd say that  Tesla  and SpaceX actually will merge  perhaps against some heavy SpaceX investors complaints.  Tesla  got away with  it  on SolarCity  Musk detests being the CEO of a public company  and SpaceX is really his baby. And  Tesla  stock has become a super currency  opening up all manner of financial options.
Finally  the long stock-market rally that we've experienced in the aftermath of the financial crisis can last forever.  Tesla  got in early and has benefitted enormously. SpaceX might not be so lucky. The biggest risk to  the company  might be that despite its triumphs  it would be out there by itself nad subject to market forces that have nothing to do with its mission.
A merger with  Tesla  would save Musk from having to pull a SolarCity  Part Deux  and ride to rescue if SpaceX gets in trouble.
Get the latest  Tesla  stock price here.
[EX A]:
Neutral