We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

[Q]: Morality aside, no evidence of deterrence aside, the death penalty costs more than life imprisonment.
[A]: Valid


[Q]: A life seems to be a good price for a serious enough crime.
[A]: Valid


[Q]: wow you fucking say i thing the ala-bye is the most important key to a murder investigation earlier and now i am saying that forensic evidence the the fucking key!!!!
[A]:
Invalid