We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

[EX Q]: However although our constitution needs exceptions (no yelling "fire" in a movie theater, and background checks for guns), no rights in the bill of rights should be outright banned.
[EX A]: Valid

[EX Q]: Furthermore, the Founders envisioned people being armed with much less powerful weapons when they wrote the Second Amendment.
[EX A]: Valid

[EX Q]: I think I've been pretty consistent in stating that every business is private and that the 'simulation' if you will of being a public area is carried on only up to the degree they decide.
[EX A]:
Valid