In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.
--------
Question: Comment: Wow, 1 emotionally charged letter from some anonymous person from Los Angeles causes a representative from Hawaii to not represent her constituents but react out of fear. We need stronger representatives here, who will actually act in our best interest. This is just sad that she would react so quickly and cowardly to such a statement.

Answer: Non-sexual-explicit


Question: Comment: RadirD, Kim Jung Un and the DPRK regime threaten us all the time.  Why would Trump or any other rational person use that as a line in the sand?  It took them a few hours after his asinine statement to threaten us yet again.  Foolish.

The only person who yells out "I'm going to punch you in the face!" is a coward who doesn't actually want a fistfight (like Kim Jong Un).  A serious person would just slam you in the kisser without warning.

Don't get me wrong, the DPRK is a growing and serious threat and there may not be a way out of a conflict at this point.  They have been seriously mishandled and underestimated by every president (both GOP and Dems) since the Korean war.

Answer: Non-sexual-explicit


Question: Comment: They love Tom Flanagan. He argues kiddie porn is Ok.

Answer:
Sexual-explicit