Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.

Example Input: Native:  It's affirming to read such a positive post.  

My background is 28 years of teaching/counseling dysfunctional adolescents.  So I've been called most everything you can imagine and many things you can't.  Each of those exchanges was a opportunty to discuss both the source of the anger and, at the same time, consider other ways of dealing with issues.  

While it's probably presumptuous of me, I'd like to be able to help Boozer deal with his anger involving the Markets.  It "eats you away", both figuratively and literally, to spend your days with intense unresolved anger.  

Thank you for your supportive words....regards, Gary
Example Output: No

Example Input: People like tbe author tend to flock to the next "hip" place, trasform it with their own presence yet blame the change on others, and move on. Sounds like a broken relationship -- "Everybody's so different, I haven't changed." Well, it is true that most of us seek out a sense of place...
Example Output: No

Example Input: Once again, the Mayor misses the boat. The now-doomed SW-SAZ plan was cooked up by outsiders (“anybody” was indeed leading the pack) and the residents of the zone were only informed later about what was  going to be good for them. 

Any plan to upzone (upscale) or change an established neighborhood requires a lot more than a meeting for all and then facilitation by Oregon Consensus. Mediation or facilitation implies that the slate already exists and we’re now going to tweak it. 

Residents of south Eugene have said no to that process repeatedly (see http://www.swneugene.org). What they have agreed on is plain and simple: a R - E - F - I - N - E - M - E - N - T  plan as the platform upon which any future changes can be made. And this plan must be community driven; no more top-down directives.
Example Output:
No