The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the no-need strategy, otherwise output No. no-need is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used when a participant points out that they do not need an item based on personal context such as suggesting that they have ample water to spare. no-need can directly benefit the opponent since it implies that the item is up for grabs.

[EX Q]: Context: 'Hello there.  I am excited about this camping trip!'
Utterance: 'I'm also excited, I love the outdoors!'
[EX A]: No

[EX Q]: Context: 'I could give you 1 water for 1 firewood, most of my firewood got wet so is almost useless . Would you perhaps except some food for another unit of firewood?' 'Oh. Let do some deal. If you give me all water bottles I will give you 2 firewood. Can you accept this' 'i could give you 2 water bottles and 3 food if you can do 3 firewood'
Utterance: 'OK. Are you need Extra food packages?'
[EX A]: No

[EX Q]: Context: ' The item I need the most is water because I need to hydrate to stay strong and achieve my goals. And you?' 'I would say water as well because I am very active and build up thirst as a result.  However, I would be willing to compromise on things to allow you to have more water.' 'The item that I need the least is firewood because I will dedicate myself to look it up at the camp. And you?'
Utterance: 'Yes I think we have the same preferences.  I do not get cold easily and will bring a heavy sleeping bag.  '
[EX A]:
Yes