In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence can be inferred from the statement. Incorrect choices change the meaning in important ways or have details that are not mentioned in the statement. Indicate your answer as 1,2, or 3 corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.

Example Input: Statement: As Devine has no living relations, it makes sense for the impoverished old men to cook up a scheme by which Michael will assume the dead fisherman's identity, and the pair will divide the money between themselves. Choices:  1. The old men come up with the scheme to delay upsetting Devine's family. 2. Michael has experience as a fisherman. 3. Michael will assume Devine's identity.
Example Output: 3

Example Input: Statement: According to the Departments, this rulemaking action does not impose unfunded mandates under the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995. Choices:  1. This action doesn't include an unfunded mandate. 2. Everyone is clear that this action is absolutely a mandate without proper funding. 3. the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 was passed in response to a budget crisis.
Example Output: 1

Example Input: Statement: The Britpack represent the new orthodoxy, says the Wall Street Journal 's Paul Levy. Choices:  1. The Britpack represent the new orthodoxy because it places British Interests first. 2. The Britpack represent the old orthodoxy, says the Times' Paul Levy. 3. Paul Levy of the Wall Street Journal states The Britpack is a new Orthodoxy. 
Example Output:
3