In this task, you're given a pair of sentences, sentence 1 and sentence 2. Your job is to determine if the two sentences clearly agree/disagree with each other, or if this can't be determined. Indicate your answer as yes or no respectively.

[EX Q]: Sentence 1: It's the idea that perfect competition might be just around the corner, not the competition itself, that keeps the paranoid prosperous. Sentence 2: This is talking about a soccer game.
[EX A]: no

[EX Q]: Sentence 1: Based on new data being considered involving the numbers of National School Lunch Program State Agencies, sponsoring organizations of family day care homes, and the annual frequency of sponsoring organizations' recordkeeping requirements, the burden hours are reduced by 23,813 reporting hours and 12,208 recordkeeping hours are added. Sentence 2: Burden hours are increased when organizations are sponsored.
[EX A]: yes

[EX Q]: Sentence 1: Dr. Arthur Caplan, the only ethicist at the hearing who betrayed any awareness of the new issues, focused instead on the morality of trade-offs. Sentence 2: Caplan focused mostly on the morality of trade-offs.
[EX A]:
yes