In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence can be inferred from the statement. Incorrect choices change the meaning in important ways or have details that are not mentioned in the statement. Indicate your answer as 1,2, or 3 corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.

[EX Q]: Statement: According to the Rochester team, the findings suggest that our language-learning abilities may have to do with our general cognitive prowess, not with any particular language module. Choices:  1. There's a language module that aids us in our ability to learn a new language. 2. The team at Rochester doesn't have any ideas concerning the basis of learning new languages. 3. A person's general intelligence may be related to the ability to learn a new language according to the team from Rochester.
[EX A]: 3

[EX Q]: Statement: It will be sufficient to say that in the early days of 1915 a certain document came into being. Choices:  1. The document was written by important people. 2. Somebody wrote a certain document back in the year of 1915. 3. Documentation didn't exist back in 1915.
[EX A]: 2

[EX Q]: Statement: Homeland  Title III of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 ( GAO- 02-927T, July 9, 2002) Choices:  1. The act was written in 2002. 2. The act was related to homeland security. 3. The act was replaced in 2002.
[EX A]:
2