Given a paragraph about cooking, and a set of conversational questions and answers about the paragraph, say whether the passage contains sufficient information to answer the follow-up question. Say Yes if it is answerable; otherwise, say No. The paragraph has the prefix 'CONTEXT:'. Each conversation question has a prefix `Q:` followed by the answer prefix `A:`, and the follow-up question has a prefix `FOLLOWUP_Q:`.

[Q]: CONTEXT: Substitution in preserved foods are generally considered unsafe. Food chemistry is a complicated affair, and cooking is inherently imprecise. Sure, you can find a way to reduce the pH to that of the original recipe. But a salami is a fermented food. Your pH might be the same, but other things will change, for example the composition of the available sugars, and you can catch a different strain of bacteria. Safe preservation recipes have either been extensively tested in a lab, or used for centuries. Making a small change can destroy the delicate balance which leads to a tasty, safe food. The solution here is to look for another recipe, one which is safe but does not contain wine. For something as risky as cured meat, I'd suggest not getting some random recipe off the Internet, but choosing from a book, or maybe from the blog of a known, respectable author. This way, you get both good taste and safety, things which are hit-and-miss when making your own substitutions.  <sep>  Q: What can you substitute for wine when making homemade salami? A: The solution here is to look for another recipe, one which is safe but does not contain wine  Q: Most of the recipes I found use wine. Would citric acid work as a replacement? A: Substitution in preserved foods are generally considered unsafe  Q: So is the wine used as a preservative? A: For something as risky as cured meat, I'd suggest not getting some random recipe off the Internet, but choosing from a book, or maybe from the blog of a known, respectable author  Q: If the recipe calls for wine would a non alcoholic wine work? A: Food chemistry is a complicated affair, and cooking is inherently imprecise  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Do you know of a book or a blogger that is alcohol free for me to look up some recipes for salami?
[A]: No


[Q]: CONTEXT: Garlic roasted as a head, as unpeeled cloves, or as peeled cloves is all much the same. It is just easier to handle unpeeled, and even easier when kept as a headFor easy results just trim the excess paper skin and roots of a whole garlic head, carefully trim just the tops of most of the clovesDon't drizzle with oil and wrap in foil, this will just make a mess, and steam them more than roast them. Garlic is already very oily, it shouldn't need any more. Roasting items should be exposed to dry heat, not steamRoast until soft and medium-dark brown. When cooled slightly, pull cloves apart and lay them out on a board. Squeeze out each clove using a firm spatula or other blunt tool. This should not be too messy. Wear disposable gloves if you don't like garlic on your hands  <sep>  Q: What's the easiest way to roast a large amount of garlic? A: For easy results just trim the excess paper skin and roots of a whole garlic head, carefully trim just the tops of most of the cloves  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Will it effect the taste if I roast an entire head of garlic instead of roasting peeled cloves?
[A]: Yes


[Q]: CONTEXT: Poaching is a gentle process - the milk isn't boiling so there is no risk of it burning or the like. It will of course not spoil in the sense of it going off, that's a totally different process.Fresh milk is better because, well, it's fresh. Powdered milk would probably work, but if you have fresh, use that.  <sep>  Q: Would using milk powder better than fresh milk when poaching? A: Fresh milk is better because, well, it's fresh. Powdered milk would probably work, but if you have fresh, use that  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: So powdered milk would make it taste different?
[A]:
No