We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

Ex Input:
What you've been doing isn't a debate about gun control, it's criticism of the Supreme Court for saying the Second Amendment protects an individual right to own a gun for legal purposes.

Ex Output:
Valid


Ex Input:
If you want any protection for your rights, you have to be able to present an argument outlining how they are being violated.

Ex Output:
Valid


Ex Input:
If certain states don't wish to abide by the same free exercise of the Second Amendment that other states do, then they must adopt resolutions to treat all other rights with the same callous disregard to ensure equality.

Ex Output:

Valid