We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

[Q]: Sent1: Unless there can be solid uncontestable evidence shown that the death penalty is significant in deterring crime, this cannot be used as an argument for the death penalty.
 Sent2: Therefore the argument of death as a deterent is a joke.
[A]: Similar


[Q]: Sent1: There cannot be a "no" answer since the death penalty is already legal.
 Sent2: Either do that or do away with the law that says that death is the proper penalty to pay for the crime.
[A]: Not similar


[Q]: Sent1: maybe we should start with what crimes warrant the death penalty.
 Sent2: Could it be that people are going to commit the crimes anyway no matter what the punishment is, so the sentence we pass should be sufficient to prevent reoffending only.
[A]:
Not similar