We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Input: Consider Input: The death penalty doesn't need to become more equalized.

Output: Valid


Input: Consider Input: - but because of changed laws, there have been people who have been set free even though they were supposed to be in jail for life."

Output: Valid


Input: Consider Input: I said that the definition and what I said are the same, because the one who is being rehabilitated is still being punished with suffering or pain and it is accomplishing the goal of them learning right from wrong.


Output: Valid