TASK DEFINITION: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.
PROBLEM: It is asserted, therefore, that the D.C. gun control laws irrationally prevent only law abiding citizens from owning handguns.

SOLUTION: Valid

PROBLEM: Can you point to the last time a private individual was successfully prosecuted either in legal or civil court for the recognized offense of having violated the constitutional rights of another private individual?

SOLUTION: Valid

PROBLEM: If constitutional protection applies to ammunition then there's no reason to believe it doesn't extend to other vital components required for operation.

SOLUTION:
Valid