In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

Example Input: Sentence: The woman held the girl against her chest
 Reason: The 'her' refers to the woman because You can't hold someone against their own chest. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Example Output: Correct

Example Input: Sentence: The foxes are getting in at night and attacking the chickens. I shall have to guard them .
 Reason: The 'them' refers to the chickens because they are the ones who have been the victims. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Example Output: Correct

Example Input: Sentence: The path to the lake was blocked, so we couldn't use it .
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the path because because lake was target point we could not reach the lake of path block. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Example Output:
Wrong