In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

Ex Input:
Sentence: Tom gave Ralph a lift to school so he wouldn't have to drive alone.
 Reason: The 'he' refers to tom because he is the one who drove Ralph to the school, but 'them' could refer to the people. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

Ex Output:
Wrong


Ex Input:
Sentence: Madonna fired her trainer because she couldn't stand her boyfriend.
 Reason: The 'she' refers to madonna because MADONNA REFER TO HER TRAINER. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

Ex Output:
Wrong


Ex Input:
Sentence: I was trying to open the lock with the key, but someone had filled the  keyhole with chewing gum, and I couldn't get it in.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the key because chewing gum is more likely to lock the keyhole. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

Ex Output:

Correct