The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the no-need strategy, otherwise output No. no-need is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used when a participant points out that they do not need an item based on personal context such as suggesting that they have ample water to spare. no-need can directly benefit the opponent since it implies that the item is up for grabs.
--------
Question: Context: 'Hello! I'm so excited for this camping trip. What do you still need as your supplies?' 'I think food, water, and firewood are all going to be fairly important.'
Utterance: 'I agree. I have diabetes, so water and food are super important to me. My diabetes makes me super thirsty and I have to make sure I keep my blood sugar under control with certain foods ☹️'

Answer: No


Question: Context: 'look  mate, let me have 3 on food and 2 on firewood, you can have the water and i on firewood' 'why would you not just take 2 packs of each whiile i onlt keep 1?' 'Alright fair enough, let me have 3 on food, 1 on firewood and 1 on water. This trip means alot to me'
Utterance: 'i can do that for you, in on a diet anyways and already have a stock ive been working on since fall'

Answer: No


Question: Context: 'Hello! I am happy to give you two of the waters and one of the fire wood. Would that work for you?' 'I could go for 2 of the waters-I get dehydrated easily so must have those. Would you consider 2 waters and 1 firewood?🙂' 'I would be okay with that, if I can have extra of the food?'
Utterance: 'I really don't need a lot of food when camping so I would be happy to agree to that!🙂'

Answer:
Yes