In this task, you are given books product reviews in English language. The goal is to classify the review as "POS" if the overall sentiment of the review is positive or as "NEG" if the overall sentiment of the review is negative.

[Q]: No Temperance Here . Ms. Reichs has lost the recipe, or at least the focus and formula that has brought her success prior to Cross Bones. Although not nearly as bad as P. Cornwell's last two or three misfires, Reichs is way wide of her usual high mark here. In this offering, Temperance is out of character, out of both style and focus, and the story is just overly convoluted and circuitous; a yarn that meanders around heading every which way except toward a finished product. Even the writing is unfamiliar and not of the same voice Reichs has maintained in her many Brennan novels. Having finally given up on Cornwell, after many years, I'll hang in there for one more Temperance Brennan dig; everyone is entitled to one gong
[A]: NEG


[Q]: Sheer brilliance . I've seen a few reviews here that say "read it, but don't go see it." Most of the time, I would probably agree, because most people who do the play don't get it; they think it's a straightforward comedy, and it is almost anything but.    R&G is all about pace; except for a couple of spots, if the pace isn't almost franticly precise, the end loses its entire effect. The beginning of the second act    "Hmmm?"  "Yes?"  "What?"  "I thought you..."  "No."  "Ahh."    takes a lot of work to get right; someone missing a beat is almost as bad as someone walking through the invisible fourth wall.    Guildenstern has the first real line in the play: "There's an art to the building up of suspense." If you aren't on the edge of your seat when the penultimate scene begins, then the director and the actors have missed the boat.    Unfortunately, nothing Mr Stoppard has done since is quite as good. His plays are good, especially if you like the Pinteresque types, but just not quite as good
[A]: POS


[Q]: Awful book, could have been written in 10 pages. . Don't buy this one. This is just a bunch of blah blah blah written by a guy who does not master the English language, so he uses a lot of filler words just to pile up pages of useless information. Not even the examples at the end of the book are well laid. He used some canned spreadsheet tables to fill in things like "risky" - "medium risk" - "safe" etc... which is just a complete nonsense in Forex.    What really made me mad was the horrible way this book is written. This Russian author could have phrased sentences using less than half of the words he used. It's a no more than a 10 page book streched to more than a 100 pages of you know what. Lame
[A]:
NEG