In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: threat and non-threat. Threat is a statement that someone will be hurt or harmed, especially if the person does not do something in particular.

Comment: Once again, and again and again, a whole raft of comments from the "smart, white men" someone with the moniker "3rd gen AK" referred to on these poor Civil Comments pages as "Earth's Alpha males"  making dumbass remarks about things they know absolutely nothing about. Laughable nonsense, all of it.
Non-threat

Comment: "We're they investigating Russia before Mueller? It's a yes or no question. Shoot."

Olé! Hahaha
Threat

Comment: "...shut it down and die."

Most Catholics don't even know what the Curia is, much less know who is in that institution or group; but you want it dismantled. Maybe replace it with global representatives from the 150 or so National Conferences of Bishops representing 1.2 billion Catholics? I don't know. I haven't the answer except that it will take a long time to dismantle the Curia -- to make the unrigging successful. Bishops can do it by asserting themselves as individual national bodies, but that seems unlikely right now. Some National Conferences of Bishops, of course, are more progressive than others. In the meantime, in dealing with abuse in churches (and everywhere, really), the best route (for bringing about reform) seems to be through local civil courts, sympathetic laypeople and clerics, the press, and Pope Francis. If courts jailed a few bishops, that might help a lot, too.

Threat