instruction:
Given a document, an entity and its sentiment towards the entity, verify if it is the correct sentiment towards the entity. Answer should be yes or no. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].
question:
Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Waymo is Neutral . SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) - Alphabet Inc âs Waymo  sought at least $1 billion in damages and a public apology from Uber Technologies Inc as conditions for settling  its  high-profile trade secret lawsuit against the ride-services company  sources familiar with the proposal told Reuters.
The Waymo self-driving car unit also asked that an independent monitor be appointed to ensure Uber does not use  Waymo  technology in the future  the sources said.
Uber rejected those terms as non-starters  said the sources  who were not authorized to publicly discuss settlement talks. The precise dollar amount requested by  Waymo  and the exact time the offer was made could not be learned.
 Waymoâs  tough negotiating stance  which has not been previously reported  reflects the company âs  confidence in  its  legal position after months of pretrial victories in a case which may help to determine who emerges in the forefront of the fast-growing field of self-driving cars.
The aggressive settlement demands also suggest that  Waymo  is not in a hurry to resolve the lawsuit  in part because of  its  value as a distraction for Uber leadership  said Elizabeth Rowe  a trade secret expert at the University of Florida Levin College of Law.
 Waymo  recently persuaded a San Francisco federal judge to delay a trial to decide the dispute from October to early December  citing the need to investigate evidence Uber had not disclosed earlier.
Amy Candido  a  Waymo  attorney  declined to comment on any settlement talks  but said the companyâs reasons for suing Uber are âpretty clear.â
â Waymo  had one goal: to stop Uber from using  its  trade secrets â  she  said. âThat remains  its  goal.â
 Waymo  sued Uber in February  claiming that former engineer Anthony Levandowski downloaded more than 14 000 confidential files before leaving to set up a self-driving truck company  called Otto  which Uber acquired soon after.
Uber denied using any of Waymoâs trade secrets.
FILE PHOTO: The  Waymo  logo is displayed during the company's unveil of a self-driving Chrysler Pacifica minivan during the North American International Auto Show in Detroit  Michigan  U.S.  January 8  2017. REUTERS/Brendan McDermid/File Photo
 Waymoâs  lawsuit has been disruptive for Uber. U.S. District Judge William Alsup granted  Waymoâs  request for a pretrial injunction in May  which prohibited Levandowski from working on Lidar  a key sensor technology for self-driving cars that is the crux of the current litigation.
Uber later fired Levandowski  regarded as a visionary in autonomous technology  after he refused to return Waymo documents at the heart of the case. Levandowski has asserted his constitutional right against self-incrimination and declined to answer questions from  Waymo  lawyers.
Benchmark cited  Waymo âs allegations of trade secret theft in separate litigation aimed at forcing Kalanick off Uberâs board. A Delaware judge put that lawsuit on hold and sent it to private arbitration.
On Sunday Oct. 1  the day before Kalanick was scheduled to give a deposition in the Waymo case  Kalanickâs lawyers called  Waymo  and asked to postpone the deposition  lawyers for both companies said in court last week.
Kalanickâs lawyers said he was in the middle of a fight to appoint new board members and was therefore too busy   Waymo  attorneys said in court.  Waymo  refused the request  forcing Kalanick to attend the deposition.
answer:
yes


question:
Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Iman Fatima is Negative . Police shot Mudasir  accused of killing five-year-old Iman Fatima  in February 2017  saying he tried to escape.
However  a BBC Newsnight investigation has uncovered allegations that  Iman 's real killer is still at large.
DNA tests suggest  Iman  was killed by the same man suspected of murdering another child this month.
Until now  police and  Iman's  family thought  her  case had already been solved - but  her  family now believe the real killer is still on the run  while Mudasir was innocent.
 Iman Fatima  had been playing outside in the street with  her  five-year-old cousin Adeel.
Sitting next to his father  Adeel told the BBC  "The kidnapper made me stand against the wall and took  Iman Fatima  away. He took  her  upstairs  put  her  in a sack and took  her  away."
Image caption  Iman Fatima  with  her  mother
After the discovery of  Iman Fatima 's body local residents began to protest against the perceived inaction by authorities. A month earlier in January 2017  another 5-year-old girl  Ayesha Asif had also been sexually assaulted and murdered.
Mudasir's family say he was taken into custody the same evening  Iman Fatima  was abducted and killed. They allege they then went with police to recover his body from a local hospital.
Speaking to the BBC   a relative of Iman Fatima  said police had called  him  into the police station to hear Mudasir confess to the killing.
Following Mudasir's death in February 2017  another four young girls were attacked  including Zainab. Three of them died  one is still in hospital. Traces of the same DNA were found on their bodies as of  Iman Fatima .
 Iman Fatima's  father told the BBC  "I'm so worried - the real killer is still roaming free  and an innocent man has been killed."
answer:
yes


question:
Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Alessia Cara is Neutral . Alessia Cara defended  herself  for winning the Grammy for best new artist after critics said  she  didnât deserve the award over  her  fellow nominees.
The 21-year-old was criticized because many people argued  she  shouldn't be considered a ânewâ artist.  Cara  won the Grammy Sunday night  beating out Khalid  Lil Uzi Vert  Julia Michaels and SZA.
In a lengthy Instagram post   Cara  responded to the backlash and said  she  wasnât âgoing to be upsetâ about winning an award  she  âworked really hard for.â
âTo address the apparent backlash regarding winning something I had no control over: I didnât log onto grammy.com and submit myself. thatâs not how it works. I didnât ask to be submitted either because there are other artists that deserve the acknowledgment â  she  wrote.
âBut I was nominated and won and I am not going to be upset about something Iâve wanted since I was a kid  not to mention have worked really hard for  â Cara  added.
 She  referenced  her  acceptance speech where  she  said every artist deserves a chance to be noticed and slammed the music industryâs focus on popularity rather than a singerâs talent and hard work.
 Cara  continued  âIâm aware that my music wasnât released yesterday  Iâm aware that  yes  my music has become fairly popular in the last year. but Iâm trying very hard to use the platform Iâve been given to talk about these things and bring light to issues that arenât fair  all while trying to make the most of the weird  amazing success Iâve been lucky enough to have.â
âI will not let everything Iâve worked for be diminished by people taking offence [sic] to my accomplishments and feeling the need to tell me how much I suck. hereâs something fun! Iâve been thinking I suck since I was old enough to know what sucking meant. Iâve beat u to it. And thatâs why this means a lot to me â  Cara  said.
 The singer  said  her  musicâs reach has shown that  her  dreams of being a successful artist âhave paid offâ and that  she  is still processing the moment.  She  ended the post by thanking  her  fans for supporting  her  early on in  her  career.
answer:

yes