In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

Example Input: Sentence: As Ollie carried Tommy up the long winding steps, his legs dangled.
 Reason: The 'his' refers to tommy because Tommy is being carried, so his legs most likely would not be aching. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Example Output: Wrong

Example Input: Sentence: In the storm, the tree fell down and crashed through the roof of my  house. Now, I have to get it repaired.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the roof because ONe would not repair a felled tree. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Example Output: Correct

Example Input: Sentence: Bob was playing cards with Adam and was way ahead. If Adam hadn't had a sudden run of good luck, he would have lost.
 Reason: The 'he' refers to adam because he was playing with him at the table, and the 'she' refers to Eve. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Example Output:
Wrong