Given a document and an entity the task is to select the author's sentiment towards the entity. Sentiments can be Positive, Neutral and Negative. Select Positive if the article expresses a positive view towards the given entity or praises its quality or skills. Select Neutral if the document expresses no clear view towards the entity or has equal amounts of positive and negative statements or expressing some fact/quote by someone else. Select Negative if the article expresses a negative view towards like harsh remarks, criticizing entities action/decision etc. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

Input: Consider Input: What is the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Frank-Walter Steinmeier ? "We must  unfortunately  assume that the two German women who were missing are among the dead " German Foreign Minister Frank-Walter Steinmeier told reporters. It was the first official confirmation from Germany of the reports.
 Steinmeier said the bodies had not yet been officially identified  but that a team of German experts was on the way to Yemen to assist in the procedure.
 The whereabouts of the six is unknown  the Yemeni government said. Steinmeier said the five Germans remain missing despite "conflicting reports and speculation" that they might have been killed.
 At the same time  the foreign minister said German authorities "have to assume that they are in the hands of violent criminals."
 He said the ministry's crisis team was working "intensively and unabated" to clarify the fate of the five  in cooperation with authorities in Yemen.

Output: Neutral


Input: Consider Input: What is the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Corey Crawford ? If  Corey   Crawford âs âupper-bodyâ injury keeps  him  out the rest of the season  which was a possibility indicated by Sportsnetâs Elliotte Friedman  then the Blackhawks will have a âlower-standingsâ issue.
When  Crawford  was placed on the injured list on Dec. 27  the Hawks were two points behind the Wild for the second wild-card spot  but held two games in hand.
Without  Crawford   the Hawks have gone 5-4-1 and find themselves three points behind the eighth-seeded Kings  who also have a game in hand.
To recap  their lot without  Crawford  has become worse  and it could get a lot worse if  he  continues to suffer from vertigo again as reported by the Chicago Sun-Times.
 Crawford  has been the Hawksâ best player this season  and itâs not even close.  He  won a lot of games by  himself  when  his  teammates proved inept or inert.  His  play had been Vezina Trophy-worthy  and even now  his  .929 save percentage ranks third in the league while  his  2.27 goals-against average stands fifth overall.
It seems impossible to imagine the Hawks trading for  another Crawford  and they donât have an extra one handy. Jeff Glass has a better backstory than a future as a playoff goalie from what Iâve seen. Anton Forsberg seems earnest and talented  but his goals-against average is more than a half-goal worse than Crawfordâs  which is a bad thing for a once-dominant team that sadly sometimes canât score even a half-goal a game. See Sundayâs shutout-loss-tank-job against the dreaded Red Wings at home on Sunday.
The long-range view goes only to Feb. 26. Thatâs the trade deadline. The Hawks will play 18 games before then and have a little more than five weeks to get some good news on  Crawford .
3 goalies the Blackhawks could pursue if Corey Crawford is out for the season Â»
Corey Crawford's injury could last longer than first believed Â»

Output: Positive


Input: Consider Input: What is the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Hillary Clinton ? A scene from  Hillary Clinton 's 2016 Election Night event. Photo by Win McNamee/Getty
Susan Sarandon is about to get a large tax cut for her role in saving the US from a  Hillary Clinton  presidency; so is Colin Kaepernick. Thatâs 2017 in a nutshell: The country is beginning to experience the fruits of a misguided hatred of  Clinton  that helped make Donald Trump president.
I single Kaepernick and Sarandon out not because they are bad people  but because even conscientious Americans like them made a grave mistake when they allowed their distaste for  Clinton  and an imperfect Democratic Party to blind them to the threat of Trump. As the country continues to grapple with the consequences of his presidency  we should remember that we are here in part because some underestimated the threat he posed.
In June 2016  Sarandon (who supported Bernie Sanders in the primary before endorsing Jill Stein) said on the Young Turks that âin a wayâ  Clinton  was more dangerous than Trump. âTheyâre both talking to Henry Kissinger  apparently â she said. âShe did not learn from Iraq  and she is an interventionist  and she has done horrible things  and very callously. I donât know if she is overcompensating or what her trip is. That scares me. I think weâll be in Iran in two seconds.â
Well   Clinton  lostâand many observers are worried that the US is inching closer to war with Iran.
Kaepernick has used his voice to raise incredibly important issues even while being ridiculed and jeopardizing his professional football career. But he bought into a false narrative in September 2016 when he claimed there was little difference between  Clinton  and Trump  saying it was embarrassing to see the US have two âproven liarsâ as the presidential nominees. âYou have to pick the lesser of two evils. But in the end  itâs still evil â he said.
He couldnât even stick to that and didnât vote in the end  claiming that either Trump or  Clinton  would just be âanother face thatâs going to be the face of that system of oppression. And to me  it didnât really matter who went in there  the system still remains intact that oppresses people of color.â
Neither is this an attempt to absolve  Clinton  of  her  flaws and faults.  She  was one of the least popular presidential nominees in American history because of choices  she  made.  She  should have anticipated the potential ramifications of setting up a private server for  her  emails while secretary of State.  She  could have mustered the courage or had the foresight to vote against the Iraq war.  She  and  her  husband could have decided against making high-dollar Wall Street speeches and other dubious choices that haunted  her  during the campaign.  She  used the term âsuper predator â popularized by an Ivy League criminologist who wrongly anticipated a surge in violent crime among young men  particularly young men of color  to argue in favor of  her  husbandâs 1994 crime bill. As secretary of state   she  argued in favor of a robust military role in parts of the Middle East  policies that are still playing out in ugly ways in places such as Yemen and Libya and Syria.
It is also true that  her  high level of unpopularity was partially built upon conspiracies  the sins of  her  husband  and double standards.  She  had been in the sights of America's right wing for decades and was accused of murder and being involved in a supposed secret child sex scheme.  She  was criticized for staying with  her  husband after his well-publicized affairs  but surely would have been criticized had  she  left him.  She  took the lionâs share of criticism about policiesâlike the Iraq War and crime billâthat had widespread bipartisan support. The crime bill  for instance  was backed by most of the Congressional Black Caucus and many black activists concerned by drug-fueled gang wars in their communities. Bernie Sanders voted for it too.
There were honest critiques of  Clinton . But there was also a caricature of  her  as a liar and a fraud that ultimately helped Trump.
And despite the claims that  Clinton  did not do enough for vulnerable and people of color  after college  she  did not head to Wall Street when  she  could haveâ she  went to the Childrenâs Defense Fund instead. And  she  went undercover to expose racial discrimination in Alabama. And  she  was an important figure in the formation of a program that still provides health insurance for millions of poor children. And  she   like so many other talented women  often sacrificed  her  own ambitions to help further  her  husbandâs. When  she  was a senator  she  was praised by colleagues from both parties for  her  ability to get things done.  She  was not in favor of going into Libya because  she  wanted another war;  she  believed it would help prevent what some believed was a pending massacre. No   she  is not from the anti-war wing of the Democratic Party  but neither is  she  an amoral warmonger. If  she  seemed likely to continue Obamaâs interventionist policies and continue to use dronesâwell  Sanders said he would use drones to fight terrorism as well.
There were honest critiques of  Clinton . But there was also a caricature of  her  as a liar and a fraud that ultimately helped Trumpâwho didnât have  her  record of public service or  her  experience. The narrative that both candidates were equally tainted by scandal was pushed by many disillusioned leftists and helped along by a media that gave a disproportionate amount of coverage to  Clinton âs emails. Voters looking for an excuse to cast a ballot for Trump or stay home in disgust were given one by the anti-Clinton brigade.
There were many other reasons why  Clinton  lost by a razor-thin margin  including James Comeyâs last-minute decision to announce a reopening of the email investigation and  her  campaignâs own poor decision not to aggressively campaign in the upper Midwest.
Sarandon and Kaepernick likely have real empathy for 800 000 or so DACA recipients whose future is uncertain. They may cry for the record number of civilian casualties that have resulted from the way Trump has prosecuted long-simmering wars in the Middle East. They probably hate that the Justice Department has rolled back the police oversight policies from the Obama administration. Iâm sure they are terrified by how emboldened white supremacists are in the Trump era. But the decision made by voters like them in Novemberâto prioritize their disdain for  Clinton  over everything elseâhelped pave the way for all of that  and more.
It wasnât just 63 million mostly white voters who put Trump in office; he was helped by Americans who deluded themselves into thinking there would be no material difference between a Trump and  Clinton  presidency.
Had  Clinton  been president this year instead of Trump  DACA recipients and their supporters would not have to wonder whether they would face deportation come March and could be pushing for actual immigration reform. Had  Clinton  been president  2017 would have been spent debating how best to improve and expand the Affordable Care Act rather than by a desperate attempt to save it. Democrats would have had a fifth vote on the Supreme Court to shore up womenâs rights and voting rights. If there was a tax reform bill  it would have been better constructed to help the poor and middle class. Kaepernick and Sarandon were wrong: There was a big difference between  Clinton  and Trump  and weâve been seeing it all year.


Output: Neutral