Categorize the comment on the basis of toxicity. If the comment is toxic (harmful, malicious, derogatory, threat, insult, identity attck, etc.) output Yes, otherwise output No.

Medicaid expansion is a boondoggle, but we need to expand it to  educate everyone as to what a failure it will be. The newly "covered" Medicaid folks will not have much access to physicians or specialists. ER visits will go up and hospitals will get paid a bit for what was formerly charity work. Let it go! Expand it. It won't do what its supporters claim but you can't tell them anything. Let it go!
No

OK.  But I calls 'em as I sees 'em, and I gave three examples supporting my conclusion.  Could have provided several more (as I mentioned).  But I don't expect everyone to agree with me on every point.

My main goal is to expose--and STOP--the arrogant, irresponsible "animal welfare" simpletons who value PET lives over environmental stability, species-level wildlife extinctions and indeed the lives of their fellow human beings.

As for the rabbits, I must respectfully decline, despite the fact my one remaining cat would probably really enjoy their company.  My daughter loves rabbits and raised them for years when she was younger, but no longer has the time or energy to care for one dealing with three kids (ages 16, 4 and 2).

As for me, was difficult enough to get my land-person to accept renters with a cat, and even more difficult to get her to agree to a second one--a "rescue" I brought home from Sand Pt in 2004.  But thanks anyway.
No

How tin eared can the Republicant "leaders" be?  Alaskans (and Americans) want our elected officials to work together for the benefit of all - not ones who kowtow to the party's ideology!  It's like a bunch of little kids saying "if you're friends with him, you can't be my friend too."  Pathetic.

Yes