Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.

Input: Consider Input: Brought to you by SEIU 503, AFSCME, and all those other union corporations who represent the teachers, State bureaucrats, police, firemen, county employees, city employees, and University of Oregon employees.  

You know, the people who will benefit by "increasing public employment by 17,700" while "Oregonians with incomes of less than $21,000 would pay an additional $372 a year under IP 28" to support  their greed. 

 And who are least able to pay when ",low-income Oregonians would be hit the hardest, and there would be no exemptions for essential purchases such as food, utilities and pharmaceuticals."

Output: Yes


Input: Consider Input: you would be also, IF, you understood how money works. Most people DON'T. Let me explain so a preschooler would get it.

For every $1 given to an Alaskan resident and spent in Alaska, it is circulated 4 times before it leaves the economy. 

That means, preschool children, $1 became $4 to the economy.

Output: Yes


Input: Consider Input: Interesting. I knew this guy. Always figured he was the type. Very creepy. Not sure why there is so much focus on Symantec in the article though. It's not like he was managment, just a phone tech. I'd be more concerned with his church activities than his employer. As I recall he bought a large van just so he could drive around the church youth group. I hope not but expect there will be more survivors coming forward.  

There was another Symantec employee in the same department that got arrested on sex abuse charges last week. I wonder if it's related.


Output: Yes