We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

Input: Consider Input: DC's highest gun deaths per capita coincidences with the fact that guns are legal there, doesn't mean anywhere guns are legal crime rates will be high.

Output: Valid


Input: Consider Input: I thought my point was to prove that your laws would be so open that heavily armed Arabs could walk onto the plane and very easily take it over.

Output: Valid


Input: Consider Input: Could you legally produce weapons of mass destruction in your own back yard "without asking" for permission?


Output: Valid