In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.

[Q]: Comment: Wow, so the 40 economists that just penned a letter that includes former presidents of the Canadian Economists Assoc. say the hike is a good and overdue......well they are wrong and you really mean Wynne just chose not to listen to you or hacks from the Federation of Independent Business or the discredited Fraser Institute.....  got it.
[A]: Disagree


[Q]: Comment: I am gay and an atheist. According to Islam, I deserve to be punished by death.  Therefore it is natural I am afraid of this ideology, ie, Islamophobe.
[A]: Agree


[Q]: Comment: This is actually offensive by Trudeau.

He said "we were looking for an idiot, we found a native"

It's basically racist.

Also, there are negative connotations to Aboriginals and 'always fighting'.

It's like saying: "we were looking for a drunk idiot, we found an Irishman"

And I say this as one who is basically never offended by anything.

The PM could have just said "we were looking for a fool, we found a Conservative" - it would be fine.

There was no reason to bring 'Aboriginal' into it.
[A]:
Disagree