In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Q: Comment: And then what happens to the restaurants? Do we let Mexicans in to do that, too?

A: Non-obscene
****
Q: Comment: Without going through the legal channels to change how the pay out is done, this is flat out illegal. 

So instead of local businesses and citizens infusing and stimulating OUR economy, he wants to pour 700M into a bucket with holess in it.

Blatant thievery. Gov. Walker.

You shame the office of Govenor and Alaska. You are guilty of HURTING the innocent and poor and taking that which does not belong to you to take.

A: Non-obscene
****
Q: Comment: What a boondoggle.  We should all be writing our MPs.  Only government coffers will benefit.  This level of 'excitement' about a largely non-existent problem in Canada (our contribution to climate change is absolutely minimal on a global scale) totally doesn't warrant this level of engagement.  This is some kind of ideological diarrhea on the part of Justin Trudeau and his cronies, and we should not sit still for it.

A:
Non-obscene
****