instruction:
In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.
question:
Comment: The Pope would do far better if he could just work a bit to wrap his mind around that ever-so-novel (and, yes, I am being VERY sarcastic here) concept that women are equal to men, and that women and men can be equally courageous and loving and good and bad and intelligent and capable, or ignorant and useless, or anything in between, as the case may be.  
And before anyone starts telling me about his age, etc, please be aware that the women's emancipation movement is MUCH older than the Pope, and the fact that, as a male, he chose to resist it, does not really give him much excuse.  Apparently, he has been wrong his entire life about this, and it's high time for him to take notice of that fact.
answer:
Non-sexual-explicit


question:
Comment: CO ACA is already a huge mess.  We just had our third policy in four years get canceled thanks to this stupid law.
answer:
Non-sexual-explicit


question:
Comment: Except that he is a felon who was in possession of a firearm while he was clearly intoxicated and in no condition to be driving or having a gun. Felon in possession is a felony of its own. DUI is usually a misdemeanor, but with enough priors that too is a felony. So the Chief or somebody high up the chain let this nimrod drive off into the night intoxicated and carrying a gun. They better thank their lucky stars that he didn't hurt himself. The lawsuit would be catastrophic. This will also likely come back to haunt APD the NEXT time they have to deal with this fool. He is now officially immune from arrest and prosecution and he will act on that in a manner we will all regret.
answer:

Non-sexual-explicit