We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

Ex Input:
Gun prohibitionists argue that the Second Amendment confers a right to bear arms only on duly enrolled members of a state militia.

Ex Output:
Valid


Ex Input:
Well on the one hand some schools insist that their guards don't need guns to maintain the peace, I say that's a stupid idea.

Ex Output:
Valid


Ex Input:
Why is a sign that says "NO GUNS" binding and legal but a sign saying "NO WOMEN" grounds for lawsuit?

Ex Output:

Valid