Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.

I find it unfortunate that the media has latched on to the "gay nightclub" qualifier. It shouldn't matter. A gay nightclub, a school, a community center. People are slaughtered. It's more heartbreaking to me when it's children. We can go through the list: postal workers, students, concert-goers in Paris. Commuters, marathon spectators, employees in the WTC, movie goers. People. What they all have in common is that they're just going about their lives, just like we do. Boom or pop-pop-pop, they're dead, injured, damaged. Is it noteworthy that these people were gay? Maybe. Sort of. In the aftermath, politicians and LEOs will announce that this hate won't be tolerated. It doesn't mean that school shootings will be. It doesn't make any victim less important. The question is, how to prevent the next massacre?
Yes

Good for Larson, he was assaulted on his private property. 

He possibly saved other lives by attempting a citizen's arrest, he was assaulted then protected life & property, ultimately stopping the pursuit. This criminal could've killed children, passing a stopped, offloading, school bus at an estimated 60 mph.

Why is this even a topic for discussion? Vern needs to make sure this never sees a courtroom.

Thank you Mr. Larson for doing your part.
Yes

Isn't it time Prozanski tried to get a job in the private sector? How many decades is this professional politician going to suck off the public teat?
C'mon, time to give newer guys with new ideas a chance.
This area has had a bunch of hubris-stuffed geezers running the show for far too long.
We need some fresh blood, fresh ideas.
Retire this guy so he can wear out bike seats full-time.

Yes