In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

[EX Q]: Comment: You are ridiculously uninformed. For your sake, sorry the Gov. is going to veto the LIO Taj Mahawker that you said we should buy a few weeks back, which tells me all I need to know about your ability to rationalize coherently and responsibly.
[EX A]: Non-identity-attack

[EX Q]: Comment: "Except in the narrowest circumstances, no one should be forced to choose between living out his or her faith and complying with the law," Sessions wrote. 

So, if my religion tells me to beat my wife, drive drunk and discriminate against gay people, I should be allowed to do that regardless of the law?
[EX A]: Identity-attack

[EX Q]: Comment: People should read up on the commie Agenda 2030.
That it will be supported by commie leaders that are
robbing the people of thier money to redistribute  said
monies to the lazy. The whole world under that garbage
will be run by drug dealing murderers. Do yourselves a 
big favor and study up. This is what Trump is trying 
to stop and this climate change scam is how they are
robbing the people. So when you hear Happy to meet,
sorry to part, happy to meet again, or brethren of the
mystic tie, you know you are in the pesense of 
murderers.   When you see your dad leaving to go
to a clandestine meeting, you know he's one of them.
[EX A]:
Non-identity-attack