We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Ex Input:
if you execute a pickpocket or give him life imprisonment, then you would have one less thief to worry about but I think we agree that that would be excessive).

Ex Output:
Valid


Ex Input:
I am sure all those psychos who aprove of the death penalty would pay for having the privilege of killing someone.

Ex Output:
Valid


Ex Input:
Why would you prefer people to be killed rather than jailed away from society so that their harm is neutralised?

Ex Output:

Valid