Categorize the comment on the basis of severe toxicity. If the comment is severely toxic output Yes, otherwise output No.

[Q]: "… most" and … rarely" obviously confused you. And it isn't necessary to look across the pond, either. U of Cal students LAST YEAR had a tuition hike-fueled protest in which a large portion of the student body walked out. 
Perhaps you think it's a great idea to have 23-year olds begin their professional lives $20,000 in debt, with interest rates far higher than cars or homes.
It wasn't always this way, just this way since Republicans began their war on the middle-class and the worship of the financial sector. In the sixties, tuition was extremely cheap at state universities; NDSL's had ridiculously cheap interest rates.
[A]: No


[Q]: Bob Weinstein you have made your point many, many times and duly noted. Reinbold needs to lead by example. Talking the talk and not walking that walk is flim-flam. I don't know of any move that she has made to get the legislative budget under control. This was traditionally a part-time legislature years ago. Senator Jalmar Kertula and others such as Clem Tillion would get of of Juneau and go home and farm or fish. This thing has morphed into a full-time paid legislature. The Governor in this State was given extraordinary powers to manage, not be micro-managed.
[A]: No


[Q]: Damn right, man! The Feminist crap has reached it's peak and the real men are moving on to enriching their own lives, instead of being henpecked and held back for someone that just wants their money anyway. Plenty of beta guys out there that will take that crap and end up hating life, instead of taking the time to find out what they really want and enjoying life.
[A]:
Yes