In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: threat and non-threat. Threat is a statement that someone will be hurt or harmed, especially if the person does not do something in particular.

Q: Comment: And if a police officer had done the same, it would be 'harassment" or "profiling" or some other politically correct name to avoid infringing on these bums 'rights' to be total jerks.

A: Non-threat
****
Q: Comment: Hahahaha. Now tell us PC spokesperson pretty please, did Ms. Ambrose make the calls to the ethics people after Trudeau's vacation event became public and and turned into a cheap political play? She would have to be awfully dumb if she did not. In addition to the hypocrisy the layer of parsing non existent differences is boggling.

A: Non-threat
****
Q: Comment: More anti Trump garbage to draw attention away from the Clinton crime organization enriching themselves while cheating Haitians. Shame on Page. This crime syndicate should have RICO (Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organization Act) charges filed. But as we know FBI Comey made millions at Lockheed Martin who gave huge amounts to the Clinton foundation and he has protected Clinton. Today info came out about Patrick Kennedy trying to bribe the FBI to change email classifications.

A:
Non-threat
****