We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

[Q]: However when a militia group makes the news, these same anti-gunners are quick to paint them as dangerous, anti-government, and even racist extremists, and an example of why gun control needs to be further tightened.
[A]: Valid


[Q]: (5) The Federal Gun Control Act of 1968, as amended by the Firearms Owners��� Protection Act of 1986, and the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act of 1993, provide comprehensive Federal regulations applicable in the District of Columbia as elsewhere.
[A]: Valid


[Q]: If more guns in the hands of law abiding citizens were the answer then it would be logical to expect the US to have one of the lowest rates of mass shootings in the world instead of the highest.
[A]:
Valid