In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

Q: Comment: As you well know, Shore, because you like me have taken advantage of it, there are no "civil comments" criteria or screening process at the National Post.   And when mentally deranged characters like "Claude" ramp up the rhetoric with absolutely disgusting and obscene and unfounded libels about Harper or others, there is a tendency for others including me to shoot back.

Unlike yourself stalking me around multi-forums (an unhealthy obsession if ever there was one and frankly kind of creepy), I don't stalk you around and make copies of your posts.  Therefore, I can't entertain the folks here with some of your most outrageous and bogus blather from the far out Liberal side of the political divide.

Tell me, Shore, are you a paid agent of the Liberal Party or an old school chum with a secret crush on Trudeau or simply a pain in the derriere?

Inquiring minds want to know.

OK, on second thought they don't ... you are a nonentity with the shallowness of a birdbath for an anorexic sparrow.

A: Non-identity-attack
****
Q: Comment: Radicalization is taught at home, around the dinner table, as the family enjoys mom's good home cooking, while the grown ups discuss destroying Israel, eradicating homosexuals and the evils of dirty infidels It is drilled into young minds with every tale of glorious martyrdom for Allah in every mosque in every city around the world. Extremism for Islam is taught the same way Christians are taught about Jesus and his message of mercy and forgiveness. It is not at odds with the teachings, but is central to the religion

A: Identity-attack
****
Q: Comment: Build the wall and keep all Mexicans out of the country.

A:
Identity-attack
****