In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence can be inferred from the statement. Incorrect choices change the meaning in important ways or have details that are not mentioned in the statement. Indicate your answer as 1,2, or 3 corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.

Statement: Participants raised questions about whether the SEC should reconsider the amount and targeting of its civil sanctions and more frequently use other types of remedies, such as criminal sanctions, to hold people accountable for wrongdoing. Choices:  1. Participants believe candles will be a great remedy for criminals. 2. Participants asked questions about different ways to hold criminals accountable for wrongdoing.  3. Participants asked many questions about the death penalty. 
2

Statement: There was usually only one research investigator, and the data consisted of descriptions, observations, impressions, unstructured interviews, and existing materials gathered at the site that were organized intuitively and informally. Choices:  1. The data collected by the research investigator proved very useful to his field. 2. There are plenty of research investigators that investigate data. 3. There is typically only a single research investigator.
3

Statement: Bakaly says no to several Snow questions, all of which essentially  Have you decided when to deliver a report to Congress? Choices:  1. Bakaly does not seem ready to report his findings to Congress. 2. Bakaly's investigation of John Snow and his time at the Wall is important to many members of congress. 3. Congress is worried that Bakaly has not been doing his job.

1