In this task, you must classify if a given review is positive/negative, indicating your answer as P or N.

Ex Input:
gregg araki 's the doom generation was
possibly the very worst film ever made .
so why did i see his latest teen bisexual angst opus ?
first of all , some of the reviews were fairly positive .
also , the cast , consisting of cameos from dozens of washed up
ex
tv stars ( including christopher knight , eve plumb , shannen doherty , and david leisure ) was promising .
last of all , i wanted to give arraki one more chance .
i mean , the guy ca n't be that untalented , can he ?
the answer to that question is three letters long .
nowhere follows the character dark on his wild and odd journey through los angeles .
since arraki does n't know how to make anything coherent , it 's hard to describe the plot .
let 's just say that dark spends the bulk of the movie whining that his girlfriend wo n't make a commitment to him and jealous because she sleeps around with other guys and girls .
the only remotely compelling storyline involves sarah lassez as a teen who has a chance encounter with a famous tv star .
he turns out to be a nice guy who does n't care for fame and wishes he could walk down the street without being mobbed by fans .
this story has a shocking twist and a tragic end that i did not see coming .
it is the first time i ever felt any compassion for a character created by arraki , and this can be attributed to the appealing performance of lassez .
i thought maybe arraki was improving in his craft .
he works better with the camera this time around , especially in the early scenes .
halfway through the film , i did n't necessarily find myself enjoying the film , but it seemed like a considerable improvement on the doom generation .
then as the movie went on , arraki loses all sensibility and introduces us to exploding heads , twisted sex games , and alien abductions .
it 's sad , because he almost actually had some decent material here , but he ruined it with his usual in your face
" i 'm such a renegade maverick filmmaker , look what i can do " attitude .
the performances are generally better than in the doom generation , which is n't saying much .
at least we do n't have to suffer jonathan
" i am the most hideous man in america " schaech .
we are , however treated to another round of james " i 'm more wooden than keanu " duval .
sarah lassez gives the best performance in the film , and kathleen robertson ( formerly of 90210 and now arraki 's wife ) and rachel true are talented actresses caught up in this mess . of the tv star cameos , john ritter is the most interesting as a deranged right wing tv evangelist .
if i prefer nowhere to the doom generation , it is only in the way that i would prefer being assassinated than receive constant physical torture .
maybe greg arraki does n't want you to like his characters .
maybe he wants to laugh and make fun of those of us who try to care about them .
maybe he just wanted to piss me off .
if so , he was successful .

Ex Output:
N


Ex Input:
i still ca n't figure out why people went in droves to see this movie .
now before you go assuming i 'm some sort of high brow snob , who ca n't appreciate a little dumb humor , let me say that i love cheap humor .
i thought there 's something about mary was one of the funniest films that i have ever seen and it was certainly one of the best films of 1998 .
low brow adolescent humor can be a lot of fun , the problem with the waterboy is that it is just low brow and adolescent , there is no humor component .
i wanted to like the waterboy , i really did .
i think i only laughed maybe 2 or 3 times throughout the entire movie .
actually , i smiled a couple of more times on top of that .
not a great record for a 90-minute film .
the problem with the waterboy is the same as most other adam sandler movies .
those responsible for this mess seem to think that the sheer fact that sandler walks around using a goofy voice and playing dumb the entire movie is a substitute for actual funny material .
nothing could be further from the truth , as matter of fact , sandler 's idiot voice started to get on my nerves at points in this film .
it 's really a shame too , because this film had the potential to be very funny .
i personally believe that sandler is probably a very talented comedian , it 's just that so far he has n't been able to find the right film to showcase his talents .
if his only talent is making goofy voices and playing morons , my guess is that his career in the movies will go down the same road as the vast majority of the former stars of saturday night live .
most of whom are now happily no longer in the entertainment industry .
sandler plays a 31-year - old , somewhat mentally challenged , waterboy for a college football team .
the team 's somewhat mentally disturbed coach ( henry winkler ) realizes that his waterboy has a great deal of pent - up rage , which , if harnessed properly , would make him a force to be reckoned with on the football field .
you can figure out the rest from here .
sandler joins the team and this once lowly waterboy becomes a football star .
as i said , the film had a great deal of potential .
the idea was a decent one , but the main potential of this movie is a result of the cast .
all of whom are very good , just hamstrung by really , really , lousy material .
even sandler , annoying goofy voice and all , has enough charisma and natural comedic ability to overcome some of his bad material .
even as unfunny as his character is , i still found myself rooting for him throughout the film .
but it is the supporting cast that i feel most badly about .
if their material had been just a bit better , this film could have been such a funny movie .
fairuza balk plays sandler 's leather - wearing biker - chick love interest and does a great job playing sleazy and sexy at the same time .
winkler is great as the coach who uses a " coaching for dummies " -style book to help him get through games .
the real standout though , is kathy bates .
even with some of the worst material of her career to deal with , she is still a treat to watch in her role as sandler 's overprotective and overbearing mama .
even with the performances of bates and winkler , there is absolutely no way i would recommend this movie .
although i get the distinct impression that without them , this film would have ranked in negative numbers for me .
which is sad , because i ca n't really put my finger on a particular element of the movie and single it out as the cause of the disaster that it became .
it 's obvious that those involved , specifically the actors , tried very hard to make what they thought was going to be a funny movie .
it 's just too bad that 99 percent of all of the jokes fell flat .

Ex Output:
N


Ex Input:
in times of crisis people are driven to desperate measures .
of course what constitutes a crisis differs from person to person .
what may be a disastrous situation for one , may be seen as a challenge to another .
as deepak chopra is known to say , " it 's not the ride , it 's the rider .
" unfortunately clear - thinking is not always the reaction to problems .
wall street wheeler dealer steven taylor ( michael douglas ) is a man with troubles .
he 's sunk his money in illegal financial activities and it 's blown up in his face .
in a matter of days he will lose it all .
his wife emily ( gwyneth paltrow ) is a highly - placed un interpreter and is not happy with her life either .
her marriage is cold and unfulfilling .
unknown to her , her new lover david shaw ( viggo mortensen ) is not only a painter , but an ex - con with a history of bilking wealthy women of their money .
emily is a prime target : she 's worth over $ 100 million .
steven 's solution to his predicament is to offer david half a million to kill his wife .
the artist accepts and the movie is underway .
drawing from frederick knott 's play and loosely based on hitchcock 's dial m for murder , this is all - too typical of summer releases .
all style and no substance .
and there 's really not much style .
director
andrew davis ( the accomplished witness and best - forgotten other films ) has made exactly the wrong choices at almost every turn .
douglas and paltrow have both shown us that they are skillful actors in previous films .
mortensen showed promise in the past .
here all three are walking uninterestingly through their roles with oddly waxen faces .
the only person who shows any sense of life is david suchet as new york detective mohamed karaman .
he 's only on - screen long enough to make you think that there might be a likable person in the film and then he disappears .
the first concern of a suspense film is to create suspense .
surprises are important .
in this movie the audience keeps waiting for something to happen .
and nothing ever does .
nearly every event is telegraphed in advance .
close - up on this object or that action
and it 's easy to guess what 's going to happen .
as the film plods towards its inevitable conclusion
you keep expecting a plot twist to make the movie worthwhile .
it 's a hopeless quest .
the story does n't make much sense .
steven 's wife is loaded .
even with unfriendly relations , you 'd think that he could have talked to her about his difficulty rather than deciding to kill her .
when he does decide on the dire plan he makes an unreasonable choice .
if you were going to hire someone to kill your wife , would your first choice be her lover ?
no matter how sleazy he is , i would think there might be a chance that he would turn down the opportunity .
why would steven plan the murder as a break - in in their apartment ?
why not just take her out as she was walking to david 's loft in a bad neighborhood ?
while deciding among the numerous summer films , you might do well to skip this one .
you 'll find more suspense than this movie offers by watching the weather channel .

Ex Output:

N