In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Q: Comment: Yet another liberal biased column by a man who has been pro establishment and a leftist since coming to Alaska. And who quotes or endorses the other regular liberal columnist Wolforth as if he is a reliable source. When will Alaskans get smart and stop supporting this one sided newspaper and produce or support  a balanced one?

A: Non-obscene
****
Q: Comment: Your San Francisco ass will be saved by your dog, not by your spray.  Too bad for your dog, but thank goodness the bear and the San Franciscan won't be hurt.  You'll just buy a new dog to scatter his guts to save your ass.

A: Obscene
****
Q: Comment: Jones has no "style", just rant.

If Coulter modified her style, she'd be taken more seriously by what some would call Mainstream people presumably those giving "funnies" here--and with a good degree of validity. She makes some great observations about her country, its policies and people. Trouble is, she does it with a sledge-hammer.

A:
Non-obscene
****