instruction:
In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.
question:
Comment: Yes, they would. The south learned a valuable lesson. Don't start a war and then get your butt whipped.
answer:
Sexual-explicit


question:
Comment: "Arson in the second degree 
164.315 
 A person commits the crime of arson in the second degree if:

By knowingly engaging in the manufacture of methamphetamine, the person causes fire or causes an explosion that damages ...Any property of another and the damages to the property exceed $750"

I think we need to add 'hash oil manufacturing' to this Oregon statute.   Too many stoned idiots are out there playing  chemist.
answer:
Non-sexual-explicit


question:
Comment: Well I sure am not.  The Donald hasn't told the truth yet.  He is just a big fat liar.  Sad that republicans can only chose liars today.  Where are the Eisebhowers?  No way republicans would pick Ike today.  This is what is really sad.
answer:

Non-sexual-explicit