We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Example Input: Sent1: I would support any law that target criminals, but I will not support you as long as you target lawfull gun owners.
 Sent2: So if you support every amendment made to the constitution pertaining to guns, than I submit your not to interested in owning a gun.
Example Output: Not similar

Example Input: Sent1: You still have to prove that gun control equals crime control and your admission that it does not is proof that it is about control and dependency on government to protect you when they have no obligation to do so.
 Sent2: Gun Control does not work, well unless you mean by working that crime sky rockets in which case I would have to agree with you and then question your motives as to why you would want it here.
Example Output: Not similar

Example Input: Sent1: Gun bans simple ban law abiding citizens from having guns.
 Sent2: Gun laws and bans are put in place that only affect good law abiding free citizens.
Example Output:
Similar