Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.

Q: No plea bargaining.  The killer should serve the rest of his life in prison.  An eye for an eye.

A: Yes
****
Q: Ah yes, Donald street, where the city traffic engineers and planners removed several crosswalks with "Crosswalk Closed" signs near the school. We wouldn't want anyone walking to school or the grocery store, now would we?

It infuriates me that our traffic planners/engineers continue to violate the city's official policy as set by the city council. They are supposed to be encouraging active transportation and discouraging personal motor vehicle use. Instead, they consistently build like it's 1950. It's time for a mass lay-off in public works.

A: No
****
Q: Yep. As I thought, you can't quite get your facts right.

And, your attempt to finesse the "boundaries" issue doesn't fool anyone. I've posted the full comments below.

What a funny concept! "Intellectual bullying." Is the definition: "using superior [intellectual] strength or influence to intimidate someone who is [intellectually] weaker, typically to force him or her to do what one wants."?

Well, let's see -- the council vote was 8-0 to use the W. 6th/7th Aves. alignment, if I recall. Must have been a result of "intellectual bullying."

For folks who don't know. LTD got caught with its pants down on the facts -- _most specifically the superior service benefits of running on W. 6th and 7th Aves._

Hopefully, you no longer have any role in transit planning because you haven't got a clue.
 
-- Paul

A:
No
****