In this task, you will be presented with a context from an academic paper and a question separated with a 
. You have to answer the question based on the context.

Ex Input:
In this paper, we introduce automatic `drunk-texting prediction' as a computational task. Given a tweet, the goal is to automatically identify if it was written by a drunk user.  
 Question: Do the authors equate drunk tweeting with drunk texting? 

Ex Output:
Yes


Ex Input:
We use a standard set of supervised as well as unsupervised benchmark tasks from the literature to evaluate our trained models, following BIBREF16 Sentence embeddings are evaluated for various supervised classification tasks as follows. The predefined training split is used to tune the L2 penalty parameter using cross-validation and the accuracy and F1 scores are computed on the test set.  We perform unsupervised evaluation of the learnt sentence embeddings using the sentence cosine similarity, on the STS 2014 BIBREF31 and SICK 2014 BIBREF32 datasets. These similarity scores are compared to the gold-standard human judgements using Pearson's INLINEFORM0 BIBREF33 and Spearman's INLINEFORM1 BIBREF34 correlation scores.  
 Question: What metric is used to measure performance?

Ex Output:
Accuracy and F1 score for supervised tasks, Pearson's and Spearman's correlation for unsupervised tasks


Ex Input:
Creating human-labeled training datasets for machine learning often looks like content analysis, a well-established methodology in the humanities and the social sciences (particularly literature, communication studies, and linguistics), which also has versions used in the life, ecological, and medical sciences. Content analysis has taken many forms over the past century, from more positivist methods that formally establish structural ways of evaluating content to more interpretivist methods that embrace ambiguity and multiple interpretations, such as grounded theory BIBREF16. Today, structured content analysis (also called “closed coding”) is used to turn qualitative or unstructured data of all kinds into structured and/or quantitative data, including media texts, free-form survey responses, interview transcripts, and video recordings. Projects usually involve teams of “coders” (also called “annotators”, “labelers”, or “reviewers”), with human labor required to “code”, “annotate”, or “label” a corpus of items. 
 Question: In what sense is data annotation similar to structured content analysis? 

Ex Output:

structured content analysis (also called “closed coding”) is used to turn qualitative or unstructured data of all kinds into structured and/or quantitative data Projects usually involve teams of “coders” (also called “annotators”, “labelers”, or “reviewers”), with human labor required to “code”, “annotate”, or “label” a corpus of items.