Given a document, generate a short title of the document. The title should convey the main idea/event/topic about which the document is being written. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

Q: Philadelphia Eagles quarterback  Nick Foles  completed 26 passes for 352 yards and three touchdowns in the Eagles’ win. (David Maialetti/The Philadelphia Inquirer via AP)
The New England Patriots opened as the favorites in their upcoming Super Bowl matchup against the Philadelphia Eagles  but that doesn’t mean it will be easy for Coach Bill Belichick and Tom Brady to earn their sixth championship ring together. In fact  it could become very difficult if Eagles quarterback Nick Foles can exploit a glaring weakness in this year’s Patriots team: a poor pass defense that is one of the worst of any Super Bowl team coached by Belichick in New England.
Perhaps this wouldn’t be as concerning if quarterback  Nick Foles  hadn’t just dismantled the Minnesota Vikings’ defense in the NFC championship game. The Vikings entered that game allowing a passer rating of 74.0 yet  Foles  was able to turn in a career performance  completing 26 passes for 352 yards and three touchdowns in the Eagles’ win (141.4 passer rating). Per  Elias  Foles  was also the first quarterback in NFL history with completions for more than 40 yards to three different receivers in one postseason game.
Most impressive was how  Foles  handled the Vikings’ pass rush  which was widely considered among the best in the NFL.  Foles  completed 7 of 10 attempts under pressure for 139 yards and two touchdowns on Sunday  producing a sparkling 152.1 passer rating out of a possible 158.3. That’s a remarkable turnaround considering  Foles  had a 23.8 passer rating under pressure during the regular season. Yes  that is as bad as it sounds: an incomplete pass produces a passer rating of 39.6.
 Nick Foles  in 2017 Regular season vs. Vikings in NFC championship game No pressure 107.8 119.7 Plays under pressure 23.8 152.1
 Foles  also extended the defense with deep throws  completing 4 of 6 passes traveling at least 20 yards in the air for 172 yards and two touchdowns.  He  was 2 for 15 on those throws leading up to the big win on Sunday  compiling 52 yards and no touchdowns while also throwing an interception.
So it all comes down to how good the Patriots defense is on Super Bowl Sunday. In wins this season  including the playoffs  the Patriots allow a passer rating of 83.2. That jumps to 130.6 in losses  lower than the passer rating  Foles  turned in the NFC championship game (141.1).
One more big game from  him  and we could be looking at a historic upset.
Nick Foles has come full circle and the Eagles are headed for the Super Bowl

A: The Patriots have a glaring weakness. Can Nick Foles and the Eagles exploit it ?
****
Q: Carmelo Anthony  stepped off a private jet Sunday afternoon  outside a tiny airport in a tiny city  and stepped into a surreal new reality.
 Anthony  grinned  walked the length of the fence  touched fingers through the links. Then  he  strolled back again   his  smile never wavering.
Oklahoma City is not where  Anthony   now 33  envisioned spending  his  twilight years as a pro. It's not where  he  set out to land when  he  began pressing the New York Knicks for a trade all those weeks ago. It would not have even made  his  top 25 the last time  he  forced a trade  in 2011.
It is  however   his  last  best hope to script a happy ending; indeed to change  his  career narrative.
This is not about stardom  which Anthony has long enjoyed. It's not about statistics  of which  he  has in abundance. It's not even about  his  resume. With 24 156 points (25th in NBA history)  three Olympic gold medals and an NCAA championship   he 's a near-lock for the Hall of Fame.
We have seen  Anthony  score at an elite level (albeit with a sometimes-maddening shot selection and a tendency to throttle the offense). At times  we've seen  him  pass and defend and rebound  too.
What we don't know  after 14 years on the NBA stage  is how much  Anthony  truly wants to winâand how much  he 's willing to sacrifice toward that end.
Will  he  accept a complementary role  to accommodate the reigning MVP (Russell Westbrook) and a younger  spryer All-NBA forward (Paul George)? Will  he  be OK with a smaller spotlight? Will  he  embrace life as a power forward  a position  he 's long resisted?
Those questions will surely come Monday afternoon  when  Anthony  faces the Oklahoma media for the first time. But maybe  he 's already telegraphed the answers.
When the breaking point came in New York  when  Anthony  and the Knicks mutually concluded they were better off apart   Anthony  specified a single trade target: Houston  where  he  could join the MVP runner-up (James Harden) and a perennial All-Star point guard (Chris Paul).
When that deal failed to materializeâand with training camp fast approaching âAnthony  expanded  his  list to Cleveland and Oklahoma City.
And as the Thunder and Knicks proceeded toward a deal   Anthony  waived  his  trade kicker (worth about $8 million) to ensure the deal.
In doing so   he  chose collaboration over comfort  talent over Nielsen rank  postseason promise over personal glory.  Anthony  has won just three playoff series in  his  career and made the conference finals only once (in 2009). Moving to Oklahoma City means a chance to be viewed as a winner  at long last.
" He 's choosing to come to us " one Thunder source said. "So there's a certain understanding on  his  part that  he  wants to learn a new way."
On Sunday  the most dedicated Thunder fans flocked to Will Rogers World Airport to welcome the swaggering star from the big city. They cheered him like a conquering hero. Only this time  Carmelo Anthony doesn't need to play savior. He just needs to fit in.

A: Carmelo Anthony x OKC: Welcome to the Storybook Ending
****
Q: Taylor Swift  performs in Houston. (John Salangsang/Invision/AP)
In Washington  an army of UPS trucks is swarming the city plastered with signs promising a #TaylorSwiftDelivery: the pop singerâs sixth album  âReputation â out Nov. 10. Four already released tracks tease a darker tone where the âold  Taylor â is âdeadâ and a reinvention of one of the most successful artists in the world. Itâs not enough to appease feminist critics  however.
Itâs been quite a year for  Swift   who has matured in public in a way few female stars have the courage to    staging a dispute between  her  different public âselvesâ in a video for  her  song âLook What You Made Me Doâ earlier this year. Meanwhile   she  pursued a lawsuit against a former radio host whom  she  accused of groping  her  in 2013  a move heralded by the Guardian as a âuniversal feminist statementâ long before #MeToo.  Swift  has openly embraced feminism since 2014 and tweeted in support of the Womenâs March in January  so you might think  given our current focus on womenâs rights and dignity  that âReputationâ would land with a girl-power splash.
But youâd be wrong. Very wrong. In fact   Swift  is already under fire from feminist critics. And their attacks reveal something very ugly about modern feminism: While todayâs feminists claim to champion the rights of all women  they speak only for women who agree with them â vocally  frequently and on demand.
[Sorry   Taylor Swift . Being a feminist is about more than supporting your girlfriends.]
Anticipating âReputation â Bustle editor Rachel Simon insisted that the 27-year-old Swift âcanât just say that the media has painted her as a fake feminist or a manipulative liar; she needs to say âI deserved it.â â Even after her sexual assault lawsuit  feminists pounced on  Swift . Salon writer Rachel Leah retorted that  Swift  is âknown to wave the feminist banner only when it directly benefits her.â Bustle agreed  decrying  Swift âs feminism as a âdeeply flawed â âself-servingâ âwhite feminism.â
As proof of her feminist failures  editor Kadeen Griffiths listed  Swift âs many faults: not criticizing President Trump  not âpublicly support[ing] organizationsâ like Planned Parenthood and not attending the Womenâs March (her tweet apparently wasnât enough.) Outlet after outlet has pressured  Swift  to condemn the president in the name of feminism. In January  the Daily Beast went so far as to accuse her of âSpineless Feminism.â  Swift  may be the highest-paid artist in the world   but her decision to speak out on issues as she pleases rather than as others call on her to means she gets little credit for the space sheâs made for female artists.
[The ACLU slams Taylor Swift for trying to protect her reputation]
We have no idea what  Taylor Swift  thinks about any number of specific political issues: how  she  feels about Trump  what  she  thinks the goals of feminism ought to be  where  she  comes down on abortion or anything else. But the ongoing denouncement of  Swift  proves that you donât even have to have convictions as firm as antiabortion feminists to be counted out of todayâs movement. All it takes to get exiled is to not affirm the party line loudly enough. And for any movement seeking to advance the cause of women as a whole  thatâs a problem.
The test of a feministâs commitment should be how  she  treats women who are different from  her . It shouldnât matter if  Swift  agrees or disagrees  if  she  speaks or remains silent. We should applaud  her  ability as a person  independent  with  her  own heart and mind  to be who  she  wishes. The same should go for any number of women who hold different political views but agree that womenâs voices should be a part of the national conversation. Their feminism is real  their perspectives matter  and they should be welcome to contribute to a movement that promotes womenâs welfare and status. That should be feminismâs reputation.

A:
Feminist attacks on Taylor Swift reveal something very ugly about the movement
****