In this task, you're given a statement, and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence clearly disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3' corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.

Input: Consider Input: Statement: yeah the uh the we were shocked two mornings ago with uh the news that a forty year old man had sold his three year old son for forty dollars worth of crack Choices:  1. We were shocked with the news about a man selling his son for crack. 2. We had never heard of anyone selling their own child for some drugs. 3. We found it normal that adults could sell their children for drugs.

Output: 3


Input: Consider Input: Statement: In contrast with the existing Section 411, which imposes a full financial penalty starting immediately after the deadline for holding allowances covering emissions, Section 406 imposes a financial penalty that is graduated, with the penalty increasing the longer the period before the excess emissions are offset and the financial penalty is paid. Choices:  1. Section 411 and Section 406 are virtually identical. 2. Section 411 and Section 406 were drafted within the same year. 3. Section 411 deals with financial penalties related to allowances covering emissions.

Output: 1


Input: Consider Input: Statement: But what about the months before Sept. 11? Choices:  1. No months until September 11 2. Months before September 11 3. What about the months before September 11?


Output: 1