In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

[Q]: Comment: They still do not  like  them dam Yankees in the South so much ado about noting.   I just whish I had toe money to move to NC for common sense and other reasons ( I am tired of the leftist coast).
[A]: Non-sexual-explicit


[Q]: Comment: The only Trump supporter in Canada's tactics :

1/Use multiple anonymous names.

2/Post lies over and over again in ECHO chamber style.

3/Villify minorities and the poor.

4/When confronted with the inconvenient truth that Americans are far more likely to die as a result of their own gun or the gun of another American than a terrorist attack, go back to point #1

You always were a bother and a bore, Sweeney.

Do get lost
[A]: Non-sexual-explicit


[Q]: Comment: PS: Kardashian Kudos to the Post for editing story and reinserting ass...so to speak.
  
Say, since we're talkin': kind of a big hole in this story: exactly why is DJ boy suing Swift? What did she do that torted him all up? You got some 'splainin' to do here. Where/when did she allege this stuff that he's suing her over? 
  'nuther thing: You got this standing there as if it's a fact in the story;;; better attribute it up the ass:
"Mueller then thrust his hand underneath her dress, latched onto her bottom, and held on even though she moved away from him, leaning closer to Melcher."
[A]:
Sexual-explicit