The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the self-need strategy, otherwise output No. self-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to create a personal need for an item in the negotiation, such as by pointing out that the participant sweats a lot to show preference towards water packages.

Ex Input:
Context: 'I would propose that I get 1 water, 1 food and 3 firewood and you would get 2 water and 2 food' 'I don't mind the division but I would like a pack of firewood added because my family of 7 consume this item as well during the day & night' 'you would have to give more items up to get firewood. if you get more water, which is our highest item, i need more of other items'
Utterance: 'How about 1 water, 2 food and 2 firewood?'

Ex Output:
No


Ex Input:
Context: 'Hello, how are you doing today?'
Utterance: 'Hi! I am doing good.What about you?'

Ex Output:
No


Ex Input:
Context: 'Me too!  I'm hoping for two food items and one water.  I'm diabetic so if my blood sugar drops, I may need the extra carbs.  And water because water is important! 🙂 ' 'I prefer two water and one food. I can understand why you need the extra food items. I'm not much of a snacker but do drink a lot of water all the time. Keeps me from eating more!🙂' 'Lol, it seems it was easy for us to come to a deal!  I'm super bad at drinking water (trying to get better) so I don't feel I'll need as much.  Do you want all of the firewood or should I take one and you take two?  '
Utterance: 'I don't have a preference on the firewood. You may have two if you like. It's so hot that I don't cherish the idea of a fire BUT it does keep the bugs at bay!🙂'

Ex Output:

Yes