In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Comment: Peeing in the park/alley when you think no one is looking is not an offense that requires registration as a sex offender in the State of Colorado. It does not meet the elements of Indecent Exposure, which requires a KNOWING exposure of genitals to the view of another person when done with the intent to arouse. It also does not meet the elements of Public Indecency (which only requires registration after a second conviction within 5 years), which requires a KNOWING exposure of genitals to the view of another person.

Also, the juvenile sex offender registry is not made available to the public in the same way as the adult sex offender registry. And first-time juvenile sex offenders are able to petition for de-registration once they have successfully completed their sentence.
Sexual-explicit

Comment: So women, a protected class, are less worthy of a college education preference than those who are non-white.  

I wonder how the gays, lesbians, transgendered and other 'protected' classes will fit into the paradigm which says racial preferences are the most important. 

Will there be a sliding scale?
Non-sexual-explicit

Comment: Sorry, Feminist girl, biology does make people different. Feminism is a political movement to promote sexual equality but the fact is that regardless of our sex,  our ability and potential are not equal given the myriad of genetic constructs we are composed of.

Non-sexual-explicit