Given a document, an entity and its sentiment towards the entity, verify if it is the correct sentiment towards the entity. Answer should be yes or no. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

[EX Q]: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Mohammad Shawash is Positive . Mohammad Shawashâs  partly restored storefront stands amid a sea of smashed concrete and debris-laden roads.
The 62-year-old with a snow-white beard and glasses decided to return to the historic souk five months ago to reopen the shop  he  had managed for years.
âI cried when I first came back. I found total destruction all around me. The stores were destroyed  the streets covered in rubble and rocks  and the buildings collapsed â  he  told AFP.
âSo I repaired it  myself   to prove to the whole world that Aleppoâs Old City still has a soul.â
â âI lost  myself â â
âI was raised here and I used to open my shop from 7:00am until late at night. I knew everyone around  me  â  he  said.
âItâs not just about losing money or stock. I lost my neighbours  I lost my people  I lost  myself .â
[EX A]: yes

[EX Q]: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Bart Fisher is Positive . The top recipient has been Fisher Ranch LLC  the family company of Bart Fisher  a board member and the valleyâs second-largest landowner after Metropolitan. The records show his company has received $27.6 million in annual payments since 2005 for land left fallow.
 Fisher  and other board members say theyâve had no conflicts of interest in these decisions  and their attorney has backed them up. They say the fact that theyâve benefited from the program is the nature of their agencyâs structure as a landowner-voting district. All of the board members are landowners  and theyâre elected by landowners under a voting system in which the largest property owners can cast the largest numbers of votes.
 Fisher  was a leading proponent of the agreement in the early 2000s.  He  said  he  supported it because  he  strongly believed it was in the best long-term interests of landowners and the community.
âThe financial interests of the board were the same as the financial interests of our electorate â  Fisher  said.  He  recalled that Palo Verdeâs attorney advised the board ahead of the vote that they were fine to proceed with the decision.
âThereâs no conflict at PVID at all  because of how we are constituted â  Fisher  said. âOur electorate is whom we serve  and our electorate are landowners.â
Standing beside hay bales on his farm  Palo Verde Irrigation District board member Bart Fisher talks about the agency's lawsuit against the Metropolitan Water District. (Photo: Jay Calderon/The Desert Sun)
When they negotiated the terms of the deal   Fisher  said  the overarching purpose was helping California meet its water needs âwithout diminishing agriculture or our community in the process.â
âI have a vested interest and so do all the landowners in Palo Verde  especially those who participate in the program â  Fisher  said.
Participating farmers received an initial signup bonus of $3 170 per acre. In  Fisher âs case  the records show  his family entities received $6.3 million in initial signup payments.
Having those regular payments can function as a âsafety netâ for farming businesses during hard times and can provide a guarantee to help in getting credit from banks   Fisher  said. That doesnât mean it always pays more than farming  though. Looking back at some years   Fisher  said  farmers would have earned more selling crops than having unplanted fields.
 Fisher  is a third-generation farmer whose family started farming in the Palo Verde Valley in 1917.  He  said the fact that Fisher Ranch has received more from Metropolitan than any other business simply reflects the fact that  his  family has been farming for a century and has gradually expanded its landholdings.
 Fisher  farms more than 11 000 acres  growing hay  wheat  broccoli  cantaloupes and honeydew melons.
 He  said while  his  business receives large sums based on that acreage  it takes a lot of money to run the operation.  Fisher  pointed out that  he  and other growers make huge investments in tractors â which can cost roughly $300 000 each â as well as other equipment. They take out big loans and have large payrolls.
âJust to be in agriculture requires access to vast amounts of capital â  Fisher  said. âNobodyâs getting rich on this program.â
Palo Verde Irrigation District officials â from left  Board Member Jack Seiler   General Manager Ned Hyduke and President Bart Fisher â  talk about why  they  decided to sue Metropolitan Water District. (Photo: Jay Calderon/The Desert Sun)
While considering whether to sue   Fisher  said Palo Verdeâs board members discussed the fact that under the agreement  Metropolitan has the ability to cancel the entire program.
[EX A]: yes

[EX Q]: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Mick Mulvaney is Neutral . As a congressman   Mick Mulvaney  sponsored legislation to abolish the CFPB  and he still doesn't speak very highly of the agency he's leading. Speaking on CBS' Face the Nation   Mulvaney  said the CFPB "has no accountability to Congress. It is perhaps the most unaccountable bureau or agency there is."
 He  said  he  wants to run the agency "with a good deal of humility and prudence." But critics say  Mulvaney  is not being humble   he 's being reckless.
Under  Mulvaney   the bureau has put on hold new regulations for high-interest payday lenders. And it's dropped an investigation into a a payday lender that contributed to Mulvaney's campaign when he was in Congress.  Mulvaney  has said  he  doesn't think those contributions create a conflict of interest.
And now  Mulvaney  has proposed steep budget cuts.  He  says  he 's not "gutting" the agency  but Democrats vow they won't take the move sitting down.
"We will fight any effort to defund the CFPB " says Sen. Chris Van Hollen  D-Md. Van Hollen pressed  Mulvaney  in a hearing this week about the agency head's decision to drop a lawsuit against an online lender called Golden Valley. The lawsuit said the lender is charging illegal and predatory interest rates.
Van Hollen says an NPR report this week prompted him to start looking into the lender. That report said  Mulvaney  dropped the lawsuit even though the entire professional career staff at the bureau wanted to press ahead with the case.
Van Hollen says he wants a full accounting from  Mulvaney  about why he did that. "It's pretty clear right now  if left to their own devices  Mulvany and the Trump administration will essentially turn the keys to the agency over to the very people who are cheating consumers " Van Hollen says.
The CFPB gets its funding from the Federal Reserve  not Congress. But if  Mulvaney  tries to slash  its  budget  Mike Calhoun of the Center for Responsible Lending says Congress could act to block the move.
[EX A]:
yes