We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Example Input: Sent1: Of course, when the founders wrote the Second Amendment they had in mind people owning much less powerful weapons than gun owners have now.
 Sent2: We're talking about deadly lethal weapons that are way more powerful than what the authors of the Second Amendment had in mind.
Example Output: Similar

Example Input: Sent1: And that assumes that gun control will have no effect on illegal firearm ownership.
 Sent2: If most gun crimes are committed by illegal firearm holders then it means that legal ownership of firearms combined with government monitoring can have a positive effect.
Example Output: Not similar

Example Input: Sent1: Gun ownership is a protected right, and the fact that criminals use guns in the commission of crime will never change this fact.
 Sent2: If a gun used to commit crimes isn't found in the registry, then the registry isn't much of a valuable crime fighting tool is it?
Example Output:
Not similar