In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

Ex Input:
Sentence: Jim signaled the barman and gestured toward his empty glass
 Reason: The 'his' refers to jim because jim gestured barman's bathroom key. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

Ex Output:
Wrong


Ex Input:
Sentence: I can't cut that tree down with that axe; it is too small.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the axe because MORE LIKELY TO REFER THAT TREE. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

Ex Output:
Wrong


Ex Input:
Sentence: Frank felt vindicated when his longtime rival Bill revealed that he was the winner of the competition.
 Reason: The 'he' refers to frank because Frank was upset. So you assume Bill, his rival, won. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

Ex Output:

Wrong