Given a sentence and an entity, the task is to select the authors sentiment towards the enity. Sentiments can be Positive, Neutral and Negative. Select Positive if the sentence expresses a positive view towards the given entity or praises its quality or skills. Select Neutral if the sentence expresses no clear view towards the entity or has equal amounts of positive and negative statements or expressing some fact/quote by someone else. Select Negative if the sentence expresses a negative view towards like harsh remarks, criticizing entities action/decision etc. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

Input: Consider Input: What is the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Juli Briskman ? Briskman's face is not visible in the photo  but the Post quoted  her  as saying  she  told  her  bosses at Herndon  Virginia-based Akima LLC it was her.

Output: Neutral


Input: Consider Input: What is the sentiment of the following document towards the entity John McCain ? At another moment in the speech   McCain  insisted that American values "are under attack from forces within liberal democracies themselves  parties that preach resentful nationalism rather than enlightened self-interest  nativism rather than equal justice."

Output: Positive


Input: Consider Input: What is the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Antonin Scalia ?  Scalia   in my view  is the best justice who has ever served on the Supreme Court in its 227-year history.  He  and Justice Joseph Story are the only two justices to have published books on constitutional and statutory interpretation.  Scalia  articulated a clear philosophy of a judge’s role  to which  he  always adhered.  He  was one of the two best writers ever to serve on the court and was equal on this score to Justice Robert Jackson  known for  his  fine literary style. No other justice traveled so much and spoke to so many audiences in the United States and abroad. Finally   he  was to originalism what Saint Paul was to Christianity — a tireless and widely traveled evangelist of the gospel. Understanding Scalia is thus imperative for all law students  lawyers and educated lay people. Because the book is a collection of speeches  many of which were given to lay people  it is very readable  understandable and fun for most age groups.


Output: Positive