In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Input: Consider Input: Comment: Is there any real difference between President Dumpster Turd and Kimmy Jojo? Both are megalomaniacal, xenophobic pathological liars. Neither did anything to earn their wealth and power except being born to similarly morally degenerate lineages. WWE central casting couldn't have come up with two more ridiculous villains. And yet here we are. That either - let alone both - of these bottom feeders have become world leaders is a sad statement on the condition our of our species.

Output: Non-obscene


Input: Consider Input: Comment: Okay you don't want to own Morning Joe and his bimbo even though they clearly espouse your views  on President Trump.
Where do you stand on the sexual practices of people like JFK, Bill Clinton, Algore, John Edwards or LBJ?
My point was simply that sexual morality does not have an ideological bias. Can you even agree to something so obvious as that?

Output: Non-obscene


Input: Consider Input: Comment: damn mirthists.


Output: Obscene