In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

Q: Comment: "Except in the narrowest circumstances, no one should be forced to choose between living out his or her faith and complying with the law," Sessions wrote. 

So, if my religion tells me to beat my wife, drive drunk and discriminate against gay people, I should be allowed to do that regardless of the law?

A: Identity-attack
****
Q: Comment: Citizens of countries with one electoral authority,  compulsory voting and  only one method, paper or electronic, have no excuse for the idiots they elect.

A: Non-identity-attack
****
Q: Comment: What a remarkably foolish recommendation.  Grab 58 people from across the state (2 are in Juneau), send them to Juneau for 3 - 6 months each year, force them to maintain two households and refuse to compensate them for it.  

The gives the governor the upper hand in battles with the legislature.  All he has to do is keep on calling special session after special session and the wheels of basic personal economics will grind his opposition into dust.  

At some level, we do get what we pay for.  And if we are moving toward full time legislators, perhaps it is time to start paying them like full time legislators.  Cheers -

A:
Non-identity-attack
****