In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.
--------
Question: Comment: Yet another liberal biased column by a man who has been pro establishment and a leftist since coming to Alaska. And who quotes or endorses the other regular liberal columnist Wolforth as if he is a reliable source. When will Alaskans get smart and stop supporting this one sided newspaper and produce or support  a balanced one?

Answer: Non-obscene


Question: Comment: Just no damn excuse for driving drunk with Uber, etc etc etc. None.

Answer: Obscene


Question: Comment: Agreed, especially when it pertains to fully automatic weapons.  There is never a need for a civilian to have them.  However, investigate the culture behind the 2nd amendment and you may have a better understanding of it.  MOST conservative posters do not think all Muslims are evil, saying that is painting with same brush, over-simplistic, and a deflection.  A better conversation would be to admit there is a difference in cultures, and discuss how best to integrate the cultures without being told continually if you have a concern you are a bigoted phobic white person.  There is truly a problem with integration.  You can investigate it on many different media outlets.  It is understandable when wars create millions of displaced and angry people, particularly men from a patriarchal theocratic culture.

Answer:
Non-obscene