In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

Q: Sentence: Thomson visited Cooper's grave in 1765. At that date he had been travelling for five years.
 Reason: The 'he' refers to thomson because Thomson still alive. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

A: Correct
****
Q: Sentence: John promised Bill to leave, so an hour later he left.
 Reason: The 'he' refers to john because Bill was being ordered to leave. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

A: Wrong
****
Q: Sentence: The man couldn't lift his son because he was so weak.
 Reason: The 'he' refers to the man because he is a person, but has no identity to refer to, and is not a physical being. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

A:
Wrong
****