In this task, you're given a statement, and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence clearly disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3' corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.
--------
Question: Statement: Opponents said reformers shouldn't jump the gun, since 1) the decision did not deal with soft money; and 2) the court refused to overturn its 1976 decision that campaign spending limits do impede free speech. Choices:  1. Opponents and reformers should act immediately without any other consideration. 2. Opponents and reformers should not act prematurely without considering all of the factors.  3. Opponents and reformers should not act with too much haste without considering hard money.

Answer: 1


Question: Statement: They wallow in anti-government rhetoric as if Oklahoma City had never been bombed, but make no assault on the federal leviathan. Choices:  1. Oklahoma City was bombed. 2. Oklahoma City had never been bombed. 3. Some entities use the bombing as rhetoric to support federal policies.

Answer: 2


Question: Statement: Sightseeing is, of course, only a part of your visit to Malaysia. Choices:  1. The only activity you can do on your visit to Malaysia is sightseeing. 2. you can do more than just sightseeing in Malaysia. 3. While visiting, sightseeing is only a part of the activities you can participate in.

Answer:
1