In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

Input: Consider Input: Sentence: Beth didn't get angry with Sally, who had cut her off, because she stopped and counted to ten.
 Reason: The 'she' refers to beth because it is Beth who is the one who has been the subject of jealousy. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

Output: Wrong


Input: Consider Input: Sentence: Madonna fired her trainer because she couldn't stand her boyfriend.
 Reason: The 'she' refers to madonna because sleeping with the boyfriend, makes a woman so angry. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

Output: Wrong


Input: Consider Input: Sentence: Jane knocked on Susan's door but she did not get an answer.
 Reason: The 'she' refers to jane because Jane is knocking on the door waiting for an answer. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 


Output: Correct