In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Q: Comment: Zuma fires competent ministers but retains incompetenet lying ministers such as Dlamini. She should be fired as a minister and taken out of Parliament, as she makes a mockery of the institution. One wonders why she is allowed to act as she does-unilaterally. The other question that should be asked is whether she has paid the court costs and show proof that the payment was out of her own pocket

A: Non-sexual-explicit
****
Q: Comment: not here. good luck getting Cory the coward re-elected.

A: Non-sexual-explicit
****
Q: Comment: Bravo CNN. Trump and his minions dog whistling violence against reporters should definitely be exposed. They didn't even name the person so I don't know why anyone is upset. He was very brave mocking and insulting people when he could hide like a coward but since he has no integrity, he doesn't stand by his words now that he is exposed. Typical. I am glad CNN did it because of the nature of what that individual did. I don't think many cases warrant it but I think in this case the ends justify the means. BTW - they did nothing illegal.

A:
Non-sexual-explicit
****