Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.

The money = speech plus corporations = people are monumental mistakes. For me it's a matter of fairness and equality. Why should some people/entities get more free speech and influence than anyone else? It feels wrong in the marrow of my bones. It's part of why we are in the mess we are in both nationally and statewide.
No

This goes way beyond Alaskan politics.  A good economist and political advisor could have seen the plummet in oil prices due to impending world events.
Alaska wouldn't be the first state or country to entice others to come for the resources and share in the wealth.  The problem is, if Alaska didn't modify its taxation structure with big oil, the jobs you all are talking about that might be leaving, would already be gone.  Something to consider.  States cannot force big companies to take the risk if there isn't a big reward.  Like others, perhaps we need to look to consumerism, diversification and incremental changes as our solution instead of relying on the oil money chasm.   
The price of oil will return - then what will the rewards become, and for how long? 
If anything this was a good kick in the left and right butt cheeks of the same congressional unit, looking toward the future of Alaska.  
But this us vs. them bipartisan crap will only alienate each other, and dangerously so.
Yes

Alaskan government is behaving like a heroin addict. Taking taxes from the fossil fuel industry that kills our lifestyle and culture. Is this really the future you are looking for? Stop #ClimateChange http://www.climatechangenews.com/2016/04/07/big-oil-spent-115m-obstructing-climate-laws-in-2015-ngo-says/

Yes