In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence can be inferred from the statement. Incorrect choices change the meaning in important ways or have details that are not mentioned in the statement. Indicate your answer as 1,2, or 3 corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.

Ex Input:
Statement: And it is impossible to see how this difference from Rust has any bearing upon the First Amendment question, which, to repeat, is whether the funding scheme is 'manipulated' to have a 'coercive effect' on those who do not hold the subsidized position. Choices:  1. It is not possible to see how this difference from Rust has any bearing on the First Amendment question. 2. The difference from Rust on the First Amendment question is very noticeable. 3. The question that was asked it really rather very subjective.

Ex Output:
1


Ex Input:
Statement: he's a big mean guy Choices:  1. He's large and spiteful 2. He's terrifying 3. He's just like a teddy bear! He's big, but wouldn't hurt a fly!

Ex Output:
1


Ex Input:
Statement: More importantly, it meant much needed, larger financial contributions from Paris. Choices:  1. Paris would need to give bigger contributions to the war efforts. 2. Paris would need to give bigger contributions. 3. Paris would not need to give big contributions.

Ex Output:

2