We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Example Input: Sent1: People have been found out to be innocent after the death penalty ha already been carried out....
 Sent2: Obviously, if someone were found innocent before execution, they would not be executed.
Example Output: Not similar

Example Input: Sent1: And that killer has help, he has the people that support the death penalty and will give him more appeals, and if found guilty he'll get an easy way out with death, he won't have to suffer.
 Sent2: If we have a death penalty statute on the books, a person is convicted under that statute, his ONE appeal fails...he should die.
Example Output: Not similar

Example Input: Sent1: And no, I don't the death penalty is murder.
 Sent2: Murder is murder and those who execute the death penalty are murderers as well.
Example Output:
Similar