We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

Ex Input:
Who can believe that the right to keep and bear arms could survive "community storage," with gun owners needing to ask government bureaucrats for permission to obtain access to their own guns?

Ex Output:
Valid


Ex Input:
This they cannot do without abandoning the more guns = more crime myth.

Ex Output:
Valid


Ex Input:
So it seems that in the case of DC the justification for protecting the right to bear arms is lacking.

Ex Output:

Valid