TASK DEFINITION: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the small-talk strategy, otherwise output No. small-talk is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used for discussing topics apart from the negotiation, in an attempt to build a rapport with the opponent. For example, discussing how the opponent is doing during the pandemic or sharing excitement for the camping trip.
PROBLEM: Context: 
Utterance: 'Hello friend.. 🙂'

SOLUTION: Yes

PROBLEM: Context: 'I understand. I am not willing to give up any firewood, but I'd be willing to do a trade of 1 food for 1 water. So 3 firewood for us, 1 water for us, and 1 food for us.  ' 'Sorry, that won't work for me. ☹️ My counteroffer is I will take three waters and two food packages and give you all of the firewood and 1 food.  I am running out of time, and if we don't agree, we will both lose out, so please consider this last offer.🙂' 'Okay I can live with that. '
Utterance: 'Great! Let's finalize then . . .'

SOLUTION: No

PROBLEM: Context: 'That is fine. I can go fishing to get some extra food but I would still like one. Can I take two packages of firewood so I can cook them? ' 'Absolutely! I don't think I'll be needing any extra firewood, you can have all three! The only other thing I'd like is 2 waters for my hike in the morning so I can stay hydrated.' 'That is so helpful, thanks! Can you send everything you would like to take so we can make sure we are on the same page? '
Utterance: 'Sure. 🙂 I'd like to take 2 waters for my hike and 2 food for my get-together later. You would have 3 firewood, 1 water and 1 food. Sounds like a good compromise to me!'

SOLUTION:
No