instruction:
In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.
question:
Comment: All the 'legal' and philosophical arguing going on related to this article is nauseating. Everyone step back for a moment and think - the fact that the current legal system requires "proof beyond doubt" that a stranger raped someone who's  extremely intoxicated IS the problem. The victim was intoxicated and had hired a taxi to be taken home. The victim ended up naked and the taxi driver had sex with her. Evidence showed that. It was plain wrong. NO WOMEN CONSENTS TO SEX WITH A RANDOM STRANGERS. (outside sex trafficking-don't go there) Our criminal justice system is seriously flawed. Many sick, depraved people are out on the street, and dealing with our children, our seniors, and our family members because of it. Let's look at how the system is messing up in the NUMEROUS case like this one...Arguing the woman's drunkenness does not change the fact-some pervert who could drive your daughter to a back alley one day too had sex with this women when he should not have
answer:
Sexual-explicit


question:
Comment: Kinda like "I did not have sexual relations with that woman"
answer:
Sexual-explicit


question:
Comment: I don't have kids but I know that my parents left me in running cars in Fairbanks when I was a kid, and they certainly didn't lock the doors.  And, it was none of the mayor's business.  It's not reckless endangerment to get divorced, drink beer at softball games and work 60 hour weeks, but somehow running into Starbucks is what's going to damage a kid?  Idiots...
answer:

Non-sexual-explicit