instruction:
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
question:
But the thing is...she couldn't have said anything else. If you are a musher and you say anything bad about the Iditarod, they can ban you. It's the new gag order on mushers, which I think is incredibly newsworthy. She couldn't say that she wasn't "satisfied with how the ITC was handling it," in fact she was specifically obligated to say that she WAS satisfied, because she's not allowed to say anything bad. Medred decided that this wasn't OK and went ahead with the story, a decision I think was right. 

I guess he could have left her name out of it, but perhaps the info was already out there and telling the story with no name attached would have been weird.
answer:
No


question:
I've been gone, when do think we last had a beautiful city?    

A thousand free weed whackers circulating in Eugene would go a long way in most neighborhoods.  So much of what I see is simple decay of older structures.

And I would add a lot of individual decisions on property care that goes with very lax standards.  Would asking a person to cut down weeds be a violation of their freedom of choice?
answer:
Yes


question:
Xavier: It's interesting that some folks (including, it seems, you) are blaming Mr. Clark's loss on his running a lackluster campaign.  From all I saw and read, he campaigned quite hard.  I saw about 10 to 1 more Clark signs and only Clark billboards.  I think he also worked to present himself as a rightg-of-center candidate.  There's also the possibility that Ms. Vinis, campaigning as a progressive who would follow the same general philosophy as Mayor Piercy, was simply more to the liking of the voters.
answer:

Yes