The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the vouch-fair strategy, otherwise output No. vouch-fair is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to call out fairness for personal benefit, either when acknowledging a fair deal or when the opponent offers a deal that benefits them. This can be through an explicit call out or can be implied.

Context: 'Hm. Getting warmer. What do you need the most of? ' 'I need more water than the other options, you can keep 2 food and 2 firewood but 1 water' 'I also feel that water is the most important. How about I take all 3 water, and you can take 2 firewood, and 2 foods?'
Utterance: 'I think the fairest thing would be that you keep 1 water, 2 food, 2 firewood'
Yes

Context: 'I'm not familiar with my surroundings. None of us going have ever been to this spot.' 'I mean I would give two waters if I could get one more food. So 2 water for you and 2 food.' 'I'd like to keep all the firewood if I'm giving the majority of the water.'
Utterance: 'Ok, that seems fair.'
Yes

Context: 'how about i get 1 water, 2 food, and 2 firewood since I'll be here so long? because of my leg i likely won't be able to leave anytime soon' 'What about I give you more food in exchange for you giving me more water? I could give you 2 food and you give me an extra water?' 'unfortunately that doesnt work for me. i am afraid i will not be able to discuss this any further my final offer is i get 2water 2food and 1wood'
Utterance: 'can we meet in the middle? if we cannot come to an agreement we both get nothing and we both lose. i am in dire need of the water to keep my leg from having to be amputated. i have children at home i take care of and i can't live without my leg'

Yes