We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

Input: Consider Input: "We could even grant animals a right to bring suit without insisting that animals are persons, or that they are not property," Sunstein said on page 11 of Animal Rights: Current Debates and New Directions (2004).

Output: Invalid


Input: Consider Input: Gun control activists love to point out any time the NRA or other organizations oppose any firearms restrictions, but often fail to point out when these same groups offer support.

Output: Valid


Input: Consider Input: Gun control has certainly become more restrictive during our nations history, and there is frankly no reason why this trend should reverse itself, barring a reversal in how the second amendment is viewed.


Output: Valid