In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.

Input: Consider Input: Comment: Actually, the income for directors of Morneau Sheppell, of which he was one, have the choice to turn their director fees into DSUs (Director Share Units). They are notional shares (options) are tied to the price of MSI, so no tax is paid upon granting. The profit on them, which can be deferred, turns everything in to capital gains. Even dividends can be turned into DSUs. If filing in Alberta, one can sell $1 million DSUs at a tax rate of less than 20.3%. lower than the rate the janitor at Timmy's pays.

Did I mention there is a clause that allows the transfer of DSUs to others? Did I mention that the Board can unilaterally vest these DSUs immediately without shareholder approval? See the MSI March 2, 2017 Information Proxy Circular

Output: Agree


Input: Consider Input: Comment: Yeah? Funny how no one asked me for I.D. when I walked onto the subway with a scarf over my face last winter.

Output: Disagree


Input: Consider Input: Comment: Has anyone thought to ask how this was handled by the minsters in the previous government?

Or perhaps Mr Chase and Mr Fife were completely incurious about this until just now. After all who needs context in these halcyon days of  innuendo and the drive by smear.

These ministers revealed their assets and their choices were approved by the ethics commissioner(a Harper appointee who was was known for years for her extreme leniency  members of the Harper government).


Output: Disagree