In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

[Q]: Comment: All I want is equal rights under the law. This country has never achieved that goal. Do you support the police murdering unarmed black folks including children? Do you enjoy being a beneficiary of that racist violence? Do you think killing a 12 year old holding an air rifle in a playground is justified? The cop that shot him was fired for lying on his job application, not murder. He is still free. How many white folks murdered by black people for political purposes would you tolerate? How many centuries of that violence would you tolerate? What would you do to stop the killing? Would peaceful protest work for you as your response? Would mere suspicion of you having a gun justify a cop killing you?
[A]: Identity-attack


[Q]: Comment: The blacks are the ones that are racists. They hate white people and do not hesitate to let them know that fact. Ridiculous waste of time and energy in this article. Just trying to make white people feel guilty once again for slavery..which is really stupid.
[A]: Identity-attack


[Q]: Comment: While rape is most certainly an offence it is a conclusion based on evidence, not a fact. The alleged victim is not simply to be believed. That is a matter of the evidence and testimony must be subject to cross examination.
Crown prosecutors refuse to prosecute many complaints because, based on the evidence of a woman's behviour, the accused man may be supposed to have a reasonable belief of consent.
You -- and you are not alone -- are trying to undermine the rule of law.
[A]:
Non-identity-attack