instruction:
Given a document, generate a short title of the document. The title should convey the main idea/event/topic about which the document is being written. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].
question:
Scott Lloyd  and other Trump-Pence administration officials are willing to put women's health  lives  and rights at risk to further  their  own extreme agendas. This ends now. [Link] pic.twitter.com/81evfdwg3F â Planned Parenthood (@PPact) December 22  2017
In declining to authorize the illegal immigrantâs abortion   ORR director Scott Lloyd  wrote in a memo  âI disagree â with the notion that declining to help a woman who became pregnant as a result of rape to obtain an abortion is âa form of violence against the mother.â
âThis memo makes clear that  Scott Lloyd  should immediately be removed from  his  position as director of ORR â said Dana Singiser  Vice President of Public Policy and Government Affairs of Planned Parenthood Federation of America (PPFA). âHe is unfit to serve in government.  Lloyd  is imposing his personal beliefs on the young women in his agencyâs careâto control their bodies and violate their constitutional rights. His overreach and abuse of power puts these young womenâs lives in danger.â
 Scott Lloyd  may think that undocumented women are not entitled to basic rights or control over their own bodies  but they deserve support and justice.  Scott Lloyd  must go: [Link] #JusticeForJane pic.twitter.com/wvGjMzl559 â Planned Parenthood (@PPact) December 24  2017
Planned Parenthood is urging its supporters to send letters to their members of Congress  demanding that  Lloyd  be fired.
â Scott Lloyd  and other Trump-Pence administration officials are willing to put womenâs health  lives  and rights at risk to further their own extreme agendas â states the abortion provider  adding:
 Scott Lloyd  may think that as undocumented immigrants  these women are not entitled to basic rights or control over their own bodies  but these women deserve support and justice. This is unconstitutional and unacceptable. Itâs time for  Scott Lloyd  to go.
Jane Poe asked  again and again  to exercise her right to an abortion.  Scott Lloyd  â against her legal rights *and* her wishes for her body and life â said no. This is downright dystopian. pic.twitter.com/bcVDlm2KXh â Cecile Richards (@CecileRichards) December 21  2017
Trump administration official Scott Lloyd  whose body and life is NOT on the line  decided it wasnât in a young womanâs âbest interestâ to have an abortion. [Link] #JusticeForJane â NARAL (@NARAL) December 22  2017
 Scott Lloyd  director of the Office of Refugee Resettlement   knew that Jane Poe was pregnant as a result of rape and that her mind was made up about wanting an abortion.  He  still denied her right to abortion care. #JusticeforJane â ACLU (@ACLU) December 21  2017
 Lloyd  explained in  his  memo that the illegal immigrant teen  referred to as âJane Poe â claimed she became pregnant as a result of rape by an attacker  but also said she had âa boyfriend in her home country with whom she had intercourse.â
âSeveral weeks after the assault  she made the journey to the United States where she attempted to cross the border illegally  but was apprehended at the border â  he  continued  further indicating the teen was persistent in expressing her desire for an abortion.
âAt nearly 22 weeks  the child has at least a fighting chance at survival if born â  Lloyd  wrote. âThe most likely method of abortion in this instance is Dilation and Evacuation abortion. This particular form of abortion is one that even many abortionists find troublesome.â
 Lloyd  cited the words of abortionist Dr. Lisa Harris  who admitted  âThere is violence in abortion  especially in second trimester procedures.â
 Lloyd  continued:
Certainly  it is understandable that a woman who is pregnant from the vile actions of a criminal would want to terminate her pregnancy. I do not  and am in no position to  judge anyone who has taken such an action or supported another in doing so. But I cannot authorize  our  program to participate in the abortion requested here  even in this most difficult case. Here  where the pregnancy is advanced to such a late stage   we  have in stark relief the reality that abortion entails  as Dr. Harris candidly admitted  violence that has the ultimate destruction of another human being as its goal. â¦ Implicit here are the dubious notions that it is possible to cure violence with further violence  and that the destruction of an unborn childâs life can in some instances be acceptable as a means to an end. To decline to assist in an abortion here is to decline to participate in violence against an innocent life. She remains pregnant  but this is not the intent of our actions. Moral and criminal responsibility for the pregnancy lies with the attacker  and no one else.
answer:
Planned Parenthood Demands Trump Official Who Characterized Abortion as âViolenceâ Be Fired


question:
For now the building will be known by its address  875 North Michigan Avenue  as the owner seeks a new naming-rights deal  said  Stephen Hearn   president and CEO of Hearn Co.
 Chicago-based Hearn  is part of a group of real estate investors that has owned the office and parking portions of the building since 2013.
âAs they did in Boston  they just decided to have their name removed â  Hearn  said. âAt this point  weâll push harder for a replacement name. This property deserves a more important identity than simply the address.â
John Hancock hasnât paid for the right to have its name on the modernist skyscraper since the last naming-rights contract expired shortly after the current owners bought it   Hearn  said.
The loss of the iconic name comes as  Hearn  decided to continue owning the property after exploring a potential sale.  Hearn  has decided to hold on to the property for at least another two or three years  meaning it will likely be the owner that signs a naming-rights deal.
 Hearn  and its investment partners  Mount Kellett Capital Management and San Antonio-based Lynd Co.  bought their portion of the tower for $140 million in 2013. Mount Kellett is now an affiliate of New York-based Fortress Investment Group.
 Hearn  said several factors  including uncertainty over future interest rates and the impact of new tax laws  slowed the potential sale of its building as well as other large office deals in Chicago.
âIt all led to the notion that this isnât the right time for a sale â  Hearn  said.
The owners instead will look to refinance the property with a new loan   he  said.
 Hearn  will continue talks for naming rights  which  he  said could be tied into a redevelopment of the ground-floor plaza. The plaza  parking garage and naming rights are controlled by the office owner.
 Hearn  previously estimated naming rights could be worth $1.5 million or more annually.
Yet  he  said  he  realizes name changes should not be taken lightly  conscious that many Chicagoans refuse to refer to the former Sears Tower by its nearly decade-old moniker  Willis Tower.
 Hearn  declined to say whether  he  expected the buildingâs new namesake to be a tenant in the building.
âWe have turned away a number of interested parties because we didnât feel the name was appropriate for this iconic property â  Hearn  said. âI want to put an identity on this property that everyone in Chicago can be proud of.â
answer:
John Hancock Center skyscraper losing its iconic name


question:
Rep. Mark Meadows (R-NC) said a meeting revealed in the House Intelligence Committee memo released Friday shows that  the Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee  likely knew about the dossier  despite  their  denials.
The memo revealed that the law firm representing the  Clinton  campaign and the DNC  Perkins Coie  hosted âat least oneâ meeting in Washington  D.C. in 2016 with dossier author Christopher Steele  Fusion GPS  and media outlets  in which the dossierâs research was discussed.
According to Meadows  Perkins Coie could likely not have hosted the meeting without getting its clientâs permission â in this case  the  Clinton  campaign and the DNC â due to attorney-client privilege. Attorney-client privilege would give the  Clinton  campaign and the DNC control over what Perkins Coie could share with other parties â especially the media.
âI canât imagine that a law firm would set that up and bring in the media without knowledge of some individual within the DNC or the  Hillary Clinton  campaign directing them to do so  because it would break an attorney-client privilege to bring in the media and allow that to be exposed without that happening â Meadows said during a conference call with reporters about the memo on Friday.
The  Clinton  campaign paid Perkins Coie $5.6 million from June 2015  and the DNC paid Fusion GPS $3.65 million beginning in November 2015  according to the Washington Post. Obama for America also paid Fusion GPS $972 000 since April 2016  according to The Federalist.
Even after that   Clinton    her  top campaign and DNC officials denied knowing they were paying for the dossier.  Former Clinton campaign manager Robby Mook  told CNN that  he  was unaware that the  Clinton  campaign was paying Fusion GPS.
âI didnât know that we were paying the contractor that created that document â  Mook  told CNN on November 3  2017.
 Former Clinton Campaign Chairman John Podesta  also told Senate Intelligence Committee investigators last year that  he  did not know they were paying for the dossier  according to CNN.
answer:

Memo Shows Clinton Campaign and DNC Likely Knew About Dossier Despite Denials