In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.
--------
Question: Comment: That both groups might or might not have committed violent acts is beside the point, the point being that what the white supremacist group stands for is not acceptable to decent people. Are you saying that emphasizing that black lives matter is unacceptable? Indeed you do, as you are a racist since way back.

Answer: Non-sexual-explicit


Question: Comment: Attention Oregonians:  Senator Ron Wyden,  a UofO law school grad,  failed the Oregon bar exam three times,  and has never been able to practice before the bar.  So when he pontificates  (or would that be rabbinicalates?)  that Trump Jr. talked to the Russian lawyer soliciting buyers for information she evidently did not have,  he was NOT colluding with anyone about anything.  A shill in a skirt did a fan dance with some legal papers,  conned her way to an interview,  was listened to until it was determined that she was barking up the wrong tree about the wrong stuff, and was politely excused.  

Now,  was there dirt on Hillary Clinton?  Who would know?  Would dirt be useful in a political campaign?  You betcha!   Would the DNC solicit dirt on any Republican candidate?  Damned straight they would!!  Is that all "politics as usual?"  yep.  The American Way.   Happens daily.  The DNC is dredging for damaging information on any sitting Republican today, yesterday, and will be tomorrow.

Answer: Non-sexual-explicit


Question: Comment: What sad state of the Catholic Church is today!
The Catholic institution clergies holding hostage the holy Catholic Church, sexually abuses children and hiding and condoning sexual criminals in broad day light before the whole world! 
So many of us had to leave our holy church and can't celebrate our Lord's passion!
What sad state of the Catholic Church is today!  :-(

Answer:
Sexual-explicit