In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Q: Comment: Who really gives a damn!!! I'm sure Obama one said Michelle's pants make her ass look hughe!!!!!

A: Sexual-explicit
****
Q: Comment: Maybe Mr Hill should not waited until 5 days before the vote to request a ballot . I live in Prince Edward Island and I call the office about 3 weeks before the deadline and a very nice young lady mailed me a ballot and I returned it the next day after it was received.  I assume that it got counted.  I  placed Mr Scheer second on my ballot and did not put Mr. Bernier in the top 10.  Mainly on the dairy issue. He should know that canada Post would not get it to him in time. Suck it up and move on.

A: Sexual-explicit
****
Q: Comment: Gov Walker should be ashamed of the way he's dealt with legislators. 

His one and only consistent strategy is to pit people against their legislators. That's the mark of a 'leader' of the lowest order, if Walker can even be called a leader.  

As long as Walker takes his cues from his cos Whitaker, a disgruntled and failed former legislator who seems hell bent on exacting revenge on his former colleagues, and his comm. dir. Jang, who is clueless, he will continue to fail...and take us along with him.

A:
Non-sexual-explicit
****