In this task, you're given a statement, and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence clearly disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3' corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.

Ex Input:
Statement: One is lulled into thinking that these contorted bathers are mere exercises in the handling of pastel, and not the work of, in the poet Paul Valery's words, a supremely cruel authority on female contours and poses. Choices:  1. One could think that this art was simple and not exploitative.  2. One could think that handling pastel is the only thing that matters. 3. One could think that a cruel authority of female contours is a positive thing. 

Ex Output:
2


Ex Input:
Statement: The rest of the building and an adjoining college were destroyed in a typhoon-fanned fire in 1835. Choices:  1. The building survived the 1835 fire, remaining completely intact. 2. The 1835 fire that destroyed the rest of the building, was started by an unattended candle. 3. The rest of the building was destroyed by fire in 1835.

Ex Output:
1


Ex Input:
Statement: if they'd been anywhere else i don't you know i don't care where it was anywhere in the United States they could have played but beings they was in Louisville they couldn't play Choices:  1. They never get the chance to play in Louisville. 2. They could not play because they were in Louisville. 3. They would not have been able to play no matter where they were.

Ex Output:

3