Given a passage with a context and an answer, construct a question on the basis of the information present in the passage. Construct the question in such a way that (i) it is unambiguous, (ii) it is answerable from the passage, (iii) its answer is unique (iv) it answer uses text phrases from the passage. Avoid creating questions that (i) can't be answered correctly without actually understanding the passage and (ii) uses the same words or phrases given in the passage.

[EX Q]: Context: Intermountain Risk Score (IMRS) uses the admission complete blood count and basic metabolic profile to predict mortality. Intermountain Risk Score has been validated in medical patients but has not been evaluated in trauma. This study tested whether IMRS is predictive of mortality in a trauma population at a level I trauma center.', 'Admitted trauma patients with complete blood count and basic metabolic profile from October 2005 to December 2011 were evaluated. Thirty-day and 1-year IMRS were calculated using multivariable modeling. Mortality was determined using the medical record and Social Security Administration death data.', 'Three thousand six hundred thirty-seven females and 5901 males were evaluated. Intermountain Risk Score was highly predictive of death at 30 days (c-statistics, c = 0.772 for females; c = 0.783 males) and 1 year (c = 0.778 for females; c = 0.831 males). Cox regression analysis, adjusted for injury severity score, blunt vs penetrating, and length of stay, showed increased mortality risks among patients in the moderate- and high-risk IMRS-defined groups at both 30 days and 1 year, with hazard ratios ranging from 4.96 to 57.88 (all P < .001).
Answer: Intermountain Risk Score strongly predicts mortality in trauma patients at this single level I trauma center. The ability to accurately determine a patient's mortality risk at admission makes IMRS a potentially clinically important tool.
[EX A]: Does the Intermountain Risk Score predict mortality in trauma patients?

[EX Q]: Context: Several studies have shown excess mortality among hip fracture patients compared with the normal population of the same age. Finnish guidelines for medical treatment of hip fracture patients recommend anti-osteoporosis medication and the daily concomitant use of prescribed calcium and vitamin D supplements. However, whether post-fracture use of calcium and vitamin D supplements is associated with survival in such patients has not been evaluated.', "To study the association between survival in hip fracture patients and patients' sex and age, pre-fracture vitamin D status, American Society of Anesthesiologists - Physical Status (ASA-PS) class, type of fracture and post-fracture use of prescribed calcium plus vitamin D and anti-osteoporotic medication.", "The study population was 221 hip fracture patients primarily treated in acute care for a new hip fracture in 2003-4 in two Finnish hospitals. After a median of 27.5 months from the fracture, a questionnaire was sent to all patients who were still alive at the time (n = 137). The patients were queried about their use of prescribed calcium plus vitamin D supplementation and of anti-osteoporotic drugs. The follow-up time for use of anti-osteoporotic medication and prescribed calcium and vitamin D was 19.5-36 months (median 27.5 months). Data on the use of prescribed calcium plus vitamin D supplementation and anti-osteoporotic drugs were checked against information on reimbursement of drug prescriptions held by the Finnish Social Insurance Institution. A total of 4 years' (48 months') survival data for all patients in the study population was also obtained, with the dates of patient deaths being checked against Official National and Regional population statistics. Patient survival was analysed using both the Bayesian multivariate analysis and the life table method.", 'In the multivariate analysis, the combination of variables that best explained post-fracture survival was as follows: age <80 years; ASA-PS class 1-2 (ASA-PS class 1 and 2 data were combined in calculations); post-fracture use of prescribed calcium plus vitamin D supplements concomitantly with anti-osteoporotic drugs; post-fracture use of prescribed calcium plus vitamin D supplements; post-fracture use of anti-osteoporotic drugs only; and type of fracture (femoral neck or subtrochanteric). This model correctly predicted 74% of cases. At 36 months, we observed a 36% reduction in deaths in females who used prescribed calcium plus vitamin D supplementation and a corresponding 43% reduction in males. Survival of females who used anti-osteoporotic drugs concomitantly was even greater (43% reduction in deaths) over the entire follow-up period. Excess mortality was highest in females and males who used neither anti-osteoporotic drugs nor prescribed calcium and vitamin D.
Answer: Our results indicate a potential relationship between reduced mortality and post-fracture use of prescribed calcium plus vitamin D supplementation and, in females, concomitant use of anti-osteoporotic drugs. However, further investigations are needed to understand the reason for the reduction in the risk of death. Population-based, randomized, placebo-controlled trials with total mortality as the main endpoint should be conducted to verify our results.
[EX A]: Is post-fracture prescribed calcium and vitamin D supplements alone or , in females , with concomitant anti-osteoporotic drugs associated with lower mortality in elderly hip fracture patients : a prospective analysis?

[EX Q]: Context: This open-label, prospective, observational study aimed to evaluate treatment response, efficacy therapy and safety to IFN α-2b for the essential thrombocythemia (ET) and polycythemia vera (PV) with JAK2V617F positive mutation.', 'A total of 123 ET patients received IFNα-2b therapy with JAK2V617F positive or negative mutation; and 136 PV patients with JAK2V617F(+) received IFNα-2b or hydroxyurea (HU) therapy according to random number assignment (ages 18-65 years old).', 'ET patients receiving IFN α-2b with JAK2V617F(+) had a greater advantage in overall hematologic response (OHR) than JAK2V617F(-) (83.3% versus 61.4%, P<0.01). For PV patients with JAK2V617F(+), IFN had no OHR superiority to HU (70.3% versus 70.8%, P>0.05), but which gained a greater satisfactory molecular response than HU (54.7% versus 19.4%, P<0.01). IFN significantly decreased the phlebotomy rate, which was better than HU for MPDs patients with OHR than HU (3.6% versus 65.7%, P<0.01). Furthermore, ET patients with JAK2V617F(+) demonstrated a definite advantage over JAK2V617F(-) in five-year PFS (75.9% versus 47.6%, P<0.05). For PV patients with JAK2V617F(+), IFN α-2b was superior to HU in five-year PFS (66.3% versus 46.7%, P<0.01). Moreover, IFN α-2b also contributed to improved vasomotor symptoms in MPDs, and especially significantly decreased the incidence of distal paresthesias (14.1% versus 37.5%) and erythromelalgia (9.4% versus 29.2%) better than HU (P<0.01). Meanwhile, IFN did not observe the severe hematological adverse events in patients with PV or ET.
Answer: The data confirmed that IFN α-2b benefited the patients with ET or PV, particularly for JAK2V617F(+) mutation.
[EX A]:
Does interferon α-2b gain high sustained response therapy for advanced essential thrombocythemia and polycythemia vera with JAK2V617F positive mutation?