In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

[EX Q]: Sentence: Madonna fired her trainer because she couldn't stand her boyfriend.
 Reason: The 'her' refers to the trainer because she has been publicly linked to a man named John Rizzo. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
[EX A]: Wrong

[EX Q]: Sentence: Stretching her back, the woman smiled at the girl.
 Reason: The 'her' refers to the woman because of her age, but I don't think either of them know exactly what the other is. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
[EX A]: Wrong

[EX Q]: Sentence: The sack of potatoes had been placed above the bag of flour, so it had to be moved first.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the sack of potatoes because The pronoun refers to the sack of potatoes that had to be moved. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
[EX A]:
Correct