In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

Comment: the muslim imported punks are not americans. they are a poison upon my country and should be exterminated.
Identity-attack

Comment: Stole the election huh?   More like had it handed to them by an incompetent bunch that arrogantly presumed it was theirs to keep.  For your edification, today's Democrats aren't your ( or my ) daddy's, and your trotting out the 1960's nostalgia file only underlines the point. Trump got elected in large measure because the Democrats are little better than Republicans( and worse in some aspects) when it comes to economic issues faced by your average voter. As a matter of fact, a number of well-knowns have made the case that Richard Nixon was our last truly "liberal"( you know, supporting all the good domestic stuff, Watergate excepted) president. Reviewing the record, I'd have to agree. Stick that in your partisan pipe and smoke it. 

"Trumplicans don't even support voting rights. They're un-American and fascists who love Putin."

Just substitute "communists" for "fascists" and you'd be right at home with Joe McCarthy. Your a true patriot.
Non-identity-attack

Comment: It is not Doug Chin's moral conviction or sense of ethnic justice that I question.

It is more of a balancing act, between the civil rights of good & non-practicing sharia law Muslims, versus Muslim terrorists.

There are many people who strongly believe that sharia law should remain intact.

I have a problem with child brides, multiple wives, a temporary wife, sex slaves, wife beating, honor killing, killing of non-Muslims, etc...

Identity-attack