In this task, you're given a pair of sentences, sentence 1 and sentence 2. Your job is to determine if the two sentences clearly agree/disagree with each other, or if this can't be determined. Indicate your answer as yes or no respectively.

[Q]: Sentence 1: Was it reasonable to destroy almost all their tremendous civilization in atomic warfare over causes our historians can no longer accurately determine?" The Industrialist brooded over it. Sentence 2: It was reasonable to use atomic warfare.
[A]: yes


[Q]: Sentence 1: With 14 million subscribers and minority stakes in everything from the Learning Channel to Time Warner, he has the resources to be patient, and the experience of the last four years shows he has the will to be patient as well. Sentence 2: Maxwell Smart invested wisely in a great many media channels.
[A]: no


[Q]: Sentence 1: De Gaulle's visions of grandeur, and of a country independent of NATO and the Warsaw Pact, gave France a renewed self-confidence. Sentence 2: De Gaulle's visions gave France renewed self-confidence.
[A]:
yes