We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

[Q]: Sent1: Most people would agree that someone who kills someone in self defense doesn't deserve the death penalty, but there have been a couple of recent cases where someone killed someone in revenge for molesting their children.
 Sent2: There has been so much cases of people who have been executed, only to be found innocent after their death.
[A]: Not similar


[Q]: Sent1: I have evidence that says that innocent people are convicted of crimes.
 Sent2: As I mentioned, I feel that two witnesses to the crime(s) or a confession in court is sufficient.
[A]: Not similar


[Q]: Sent1: A removal from death row by either state courts or the U.S. Supreme Court is associated with an increase of one additional murder.
 Sent2: Additionally, the implementation of state moratoria is associated with the increased incidence of murders.
[A]:
Similar