In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

Example Input: Sentence: Madonna fired her trainer because she couldn't stand her boyfriend.
 Reason: The 'she' refers to madonna because MADONNA REFER TO HER TRAINER. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Example Output: Wrong

Example Input: Sentence: If the con artist has succeeded in fooling Sam, he would have gotten a lot of money.
 Reason: The 'he' refers to the con artist because the 'she' is likely to be a woman. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Example Output: Wrong

Example Input: Sentence: In July, Kamtchatka declared war on Yakutsk. Since Yakutsk's army was much  better equipped and ten times larger, they were defeated within weeks.
 Reason: The 'they' refers to kamtchatka because defeat is more likely to the war. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Example Output:
Correct