We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Example Input: But it's easy to see that a less violent environment, incuding representations of violence, would help speeding the educating process and avoiding some bad issues.
Example Output: Valid

Example Input: If you are going to argue for or against the death penalty, at least try to be a credit to the argument and present something that makes sense.
Example Output: Valid

Example Input: Since murder is viewed as wrong, it generally makes more sense to eliminate the death penalty because murder rates are generally lower in those states.
Example Output:
Valid