Given a document, an entity and its sentiment towards the entity, verify if it is the correct sentiment towards the entity. Answer should be yes or no. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

Q: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Stephanie O'Neill is Positive . Now we'd like to hear a bit more about the Thomas fire  the biggest fire in the region right now. Thomas has been burning since Monday across Ventura County  north of Los Angeles.  Reporter Stephanie O'Neill  lives in the city of Ojai and has been witnessing the destruction firsthand.  Stephanie   thanks so much for speaking with us.
 STEPHANIE  O'NEILL: You're welcome.
MARTIN: That's  reporter Stephanie O'Neill  talking to us from Ojai  Calif. - that's north of Los Angeles - with an update on the devastating fire that's burning there right now. Stephanie  thanks so much for speaking with us.
 O'NEILL : You're welcome.

A: yes
****
Q: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Guzman is Positive . A US judge on Wednesday postponed until September the trial in New York of notorious Mexican drug lord Joaquin "El Chapo" Guzman.
On Monday  Cogan had delayed the latest pre-trial hearing from January 19 to February 15  after  Guzman 's lawyer demanded more time to review several hundred thousand pages of documents in the case.
 Guzman  has been held in solitary confinement in New York since being extradited to the United States a year ago.
Accused of running the Sinaloa cartel   he  is facing 17 charges  and if convicted   he  is likely to spend the rest of  his  life in a maximum security US prison.

A: no
****
Q: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Barry Nussbaum is Neutral . Then  last week  reader David P. pointed me to a column by  Barry Nussbaum   chief statistician at the EPA for over a decade and currently president of the American Statistical Association. As soon as I read it I called  Nussbaum   who was a young EPA analyst in the late 70s when heâwell  weâll get to that. First  though  the answer to my question.
According to  Nussbaum   EPA wanted places like California to reduce smog  and that meant cars would have to be fitted with catalytic converters. However  since gasoline lead ruins catalytic converters  refineries needed to produced unleaded gasoline. This was the initial impetus behind unleaded gasoline. The fact that it also reduced atmospheric lead was basically a happy accident.
The first itemâunfortunately for HUDâsuggested that lead poisoning was not correlated with lead paint in housing. After all  thereâs no reason to think that kids are exposed to more lead paint in the summer. The second item suggests that lead poisoning is correlated with gasoline lead.Â² And the third item immediately convinced Carter to continue the lead phasedown. âHe stated he did not want any policy that might have a particularly deleterious effect on these two groups â  Nussbaum  says.
On a statistical note   Nussbaum  adds this: âWith the benefit of hindsight  Carter was concerned about the harmful effects on minority populations. Would he have even have known this if the graph just had one composite line for blood lead?â Maybe not. Sometimes flukes of data presentation are all it takes to influence public policy.
Â¹If youâre wondering why the chart doesnât show white children  the answer is lost to history.  Nussbaum  thinks it might have something to do with the limits of plotting technology at the time. In any case  everyone knew what the line looked like: just like the other two  but lower.

A:
no
****