In this task, you're given a statement, and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence clearly disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3' corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.
--------
Question: Statement: An attorney representing a client before judge and jury was no longer the norm of a case when delivering critical legal services to low-income individuals. Choices:  1. Attorneys representing low-income individuals are the norm. 2. The norm of the case was violated when the attorney delivered their services. 3. Low-income individuals are often targeted by the justice system because of their inability to finance their legal battles.

Answer: 1


Question: Statement: - Limestone conveying and crushing (e.g. Choices:  1. It's impossible to crush limestone. 2. It's very easy to crush limestone. 3. There is conveying and crushing of limestone.

Answer: 1


Question: Statement: The heart of the city is tiny Venizelos Square (Plateaa Venizelou) with its fringe of cafes and restaurants. Choices:  1. Venizelos Square (Plateaa Venizelou) is at the heart of the city and has cafes and restaurants. 2. Visitors always end up in Venizelos Square in the early evening hours for dinner. 3. Venizelos Square is a large, barren piece of land with no signs of civilization.

Answer:
3