We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Ex Input:
Now, we must define juvenille, one who is not of the age of majority.

Ex Output:
Invalid


Ex Input:
The non-repeat offenders are typically people who committed much smaller crimes that would never be worthy of the death penalty in the first place.

Ex Output:
Valid


Ex Input:
what I am talking about is not a death penalty trial as we have today, but after the person has received a 100 year or more sentence.

Ex Output:

Valid