In this task, you're given a statement, and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence clearly disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3' corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.

Input: Consider Input: Statement: It means that instead of blandly assuming less regulation is better than more or more competition is better than less, you have to study the specifics of each case very carefully. Choices:  1. Studying the specifics of every case is what it means. 2. If you don't study the specifics, you won't get it right. 3. There's no need to study the specifics, not at all.

Output: 3


Input: Consider Input: Statement: It is the earliest surviving example of classical Ottoman architecture, inspired by Haghia Sophia . Choices:  1. Haghia Sophia built a similar structure three hundred years earlier, which inspired it. 2. This is fairly young compared to the other surviving ottoman structures that can be seen. 3. This is the oldest example of classical ottoman architecture that we can still see.

Output: 2


Input: Consider Input: Statement: 7 Privatization gone awry. Choices:  1. Privatization went awry. 2. Privatization works for everything. 3. Privatization doesn't work for everything.


Output: 2