We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Example Input: Sent1: Some prisons are actually prisons instead of criminal resorts, and those are the best to put scum like them in.
 Sent2: If someone is wrongly convicted of a crime and put in jail, they can be released if they're found to be innocent.
Example Output: Not similar

Example Input: Sent1: If these are indeed comparable, I wouldn't argue for the death penalty even in murder.
 Sent2: I am not a pacifist, so I am not opposed to all state-sanctioned killing.
Example Output: Not similar

Example Input: Sent1: At least 11 of the cases were not even on death row at the time of their "innocence" discovery.
 Sent2: There has been so much cases of people who have been executed, only to be found innocent after their death.
Example Output:
Not similar