instruction:
Given a document, an entity and its sentiment towards the entity, verify if it is the correct sentiment towards the entity. Answer should be yes or no. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].
question:
Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Rosemary Domino is Neutral . Domino  became a global star but stayed true to  his  hometown  where  his  fate was initially unknown after Hurricane Katrina struck in August 2005. It turned out that  he  and  his  family were rescued by boat from  his  home  where  he  lost three pianos and dozens of gold and platinum records  along with other memorabilia.
Many wondered if  he  would ever return to the stage. Scheduled to perform at the New Orleans Jazz and Heritage Festival in 2006   he  simply tipped  his  hat to thousands of cheering fans.
But in May 2007   he  was back  performing at Tipitina's music club in New Orleans. Fans cheered â and some cried â as  Domino  played "I'm Walkin' " ''Ain't It a Shame " ''Shake  Rattle and Roll " ''Blueberry Hill" and a host of other hits.
That performance was a highlight during several rough years. After losing their home and almost all their belongings to the floods   his  wife of more than 50 years  Rosemary  died in April 2008.
 Domino  moved to the New Orleans suburb of Harvey after the storm but would often visit  his  publishing house  an extension of  his  old home in the Lower 9th Ward  inspiring many with  his  determination to stay in the city  he  loved.
"Fats embodies everything good about New Orleans "  his  friend David Lind said in a 2008 interview. " He 's warm  fun-loving  spiritual  creative and humble. You don't get more New Orleans than that."
In 1955  he broke into the white pop charts with "Ain't it a Shame" â but actually sang the lyrics as "ain't that a shame." The song was covered blandly by Pat Boone as "Ain't That a Shame" and rocked out years later by Cheap Trick.  Domino  enjoyed a parade of successes through the early 1960s  including "Be My Guest" and "I'm Ready." Another hit  "I'm Walkin '" became the debut single for Ricky Nelson.
 Domino  appeared in the rock 'n' roll film "The Girl Can't Help It" and was among the first black performers to be featured in popular music shows  starring with Buddy Holly and the Everly Brothers. He also helped bridge rock 'n' roll and other styles â even country/western  recording Hank Williams' "Jambalaya" and Bobby Charles' "Walkin' to New Orleans."
Like many of his peers   Domino 's popularity tapered off in the 1960s as British and psychedelic rock held sway.
 Domino  told Ebony magazine that  he  stopped recording because companies wanted  him  to update  his  style.
"I refused to change "  he  said. "I had to stick to my own style that I've always used or it just wouldn't be me. "
Antoine and Rosemary Domino  raised eight children in the same ramshackle neighborhood where  he  grew up  but  they  did it in style â in a white mansion  trimmed in pink  yellow and lavender. The front double doors opened into an atrium with chandeliers hanging from the ceiling and ivory dominos set in a white marble floor.
In 1988  all of New Orleans seemed to be talking about  him  after  he  reportedly paid in cash for two Cadillacs and a $130 000 Rolls-Royce. When the salesman asked if he wanted to call his bank about financing   Domino  smiled and said  "I am the bank."
In 1998   he  became the first purely rock 'n' roll musician to be awarded the National Medal for the Arts. But  he  cited  his  age and didn't make the trip to the White House to get the medal from President Clinton.
That was typical. Aside from rare appearances in New Orleans   he  dodged the spotlight in  his  later years  refusing to appear in public or even to give interviews.
answer:
no


question:
Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Eric Krieg is Neutral . WASHINGTON â A former Republican political candidate in Indiana who authored a right-wing blog was arrested this week for allegedly mailing a pipe bomb and a threatening letter containing a bullet to two of his political opponents. The pipe bomb exploded at a post office  leaving a pregnant postal worker with âcuts  abrasions and bruises to her head  legs  and feet. â
Eric Krieg  a 45-year-old resident of the city of Munster   was charged with knowing possession of a destructive device and transporting explosive materials.  He  was arrested on Thursday after the FBI executed search warrants at  his  residence   his  work and on  his  vehicle. The Justice Department put out a straightforward press release about Kriegâs arrest  but a FBI agentâs affidavit offered a lot more of an interesting backstory.
The package containing a pipe bomb that exploded at a post office in East Chicago  Indiana  on Sept. 6 had been addressed to an attorney who the feds labeled âVictim 1.â The lawyer had represented a person who filed a defamation lawsuit against  Krieg  that was settled for around $60 000  which led  Krieg  to declare bankruptcy  according to the feds.
The feds say  Krieg  was a blogger who went by the nickname âbuzzcutâ and wrote a blog  âBlue County in a Red State â which is no longer active. The blogâs tagline said it was about âLife in the most corrupt county in America: Lake County  Indiana.â But Krieg  who was described by a local columnist as âthe unofficial mud-thrower of the Lake County Republican Party â has run for county council and as country surveyor in Lake County.
The attorney who represented the individual who sued  Krieg  for defamation also told the feds that he believes he might have been targeted by Krieg because he authored an opinion on behalf of the city supporting an LGBTQ ordinance he believed  Krieg  may have disagreed with. The city of Munster passed a human rights ordinance that prohibited discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation back in 2016.
The victim who received a bullet that was wrapped in tape and had a message â âThe next one will be in the back of your headâ â had criticized  Krieg  online back in 2013.
 Krieg  admitted that  he  had mailed the explosive device in an interview with FBI special agents before  his  arrest  according to the FBI. A federal magistrate judge ordered  Krieg  held until a detention hearing next week.
answer:
yes


question:
Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Swearingen is Positive . Trotter had been missing since December 8  1998  when she disappeared from the Montgomery County community college where she was a first-year student. Three days later  on unrelated warrants  the police arrested  Larry Swearingen  a 27-year-old unemployed electrician with a young family and a history of run-ins with the law . Police suspected  Swearingen  was Trotterâs killer. He had been seen talking with Trotter two days before her disappearance outside a local store near Lake Conroe  which abuts the national forest. On the day she went missing  he was seen chatting with her in the college library.
After the body was found some three weeks later   Swearingen  was charged with Trotterâs kidnapping  sexual assault  and murder. There was little in the way of hard evidence to back up the charges. In addition to the two times he was seen talking to Trotter prior to her disappearance  the state pointed to a lie he told  claiming he didnât know who Trotter was  and to a letter he wrote while jailed in which he pretended to be someone else and claimed knowledge about the murder that officials said only the killer would know.
In 2000   Swearingen  was tried for the crime and sentenced to death.
Nearly 20 years after the murder   he  maintains  his  innocence  and for more than a decade  he  has been fighting to clear  his  name  in part by repeatedly requesting that key crime scene evidence be subjected to DNA testing. While the stateâs case against  him  was built on circumstantial evidence  there was also a trove of physical evidence that prosecutors seemingly either ignored or dismissed.
The state insisted that the length of hose matched a second piece of hosiery retrieved from the trailer home  Swearingen  shared with  his  wife  Terry. But the hose from the trailer wasnât found until weeks after Trotterâs body was discovered  after police had conducted two exhaustive searches of the Swearingen property. And instead of submitting either piece for DNA testing  the state had a forensic analyst line them up side by side to determine visually whether they came from the same pair of hosiery â the kind of subjective forensic pattern analysis that raises serious concerns about scientific validity and reliability. At  Swearingen âs trial  the analyst testified that the two lengths of hose matched âto the exclusion of all other pantyhose.â
According to court filings  evidence that was tested pointed away from  Swearingen . DNA collected from a cigarette butt found in  Swearingen âs trailer that prosecutors claimed belonged to Trotter excluded her as the donor. And DNA developed from blood found in fingernail scrapings taken from Trotterâs body at autopsy excluded  Swearingen   revealing instead the profile of an unknown male.
To date  Texasâs highest criminal court  the Court of Criminal Appeals  has sided with the state  concluding that the âmountainâ of circumstantial evidence against  Swearingen  outweighs the potentially probative value of DNA evidence. The court has denied his request for testing four times â highlighting a confounding  if not obstructionist  approach to requests made for post-conviction DNA testing under state law.
In  Swearingen âs case and others  the court has construed the right to testing in a way that severely narrows eligibility â an approach that  Swearingen âs lawyers say threatens to make the once powerful law a dead letter  potentially closing access to testing in all cases where there is a claim of wrongful conviction.
 Swearingen  is scheduled for execution on November 16.
Death row inmate  Larry Swearingen  during an interview at the Polunsky Unit in Longview  Texas. Photo: Jacob Villanueva/The Texas Tribune
When  Swearingen  first sought DNA testing in 2004  the denial was straightforward â the CCA refused to consider the request because  Swearingen âs lawyers had missed a filing deadline.
In its 2010 ruling  the court noted that the statute only allowed testing of evidence âcontaining biological materialâ and concluded that  Swearingen  could not demonstrate that the items  he  wanted to test â the pantyhose  additional fingernail scrapings  and clothing â were actually âprovenâ to contain such material.
âThis court has held that a mere assertion or a general claim that existence of biological material is probable will fail to satisfy the appellantâs burdenâ under the statute  the court wrote. It also faulted  Swearingen  for suggesting that any unknown profile developed from DNA testing should be run against state and federal databases  a provision that didnât appear in the statute.
 Swearingen  filed for testing again in 2013. Newly elected District Judge Kelly Case approved his request  which was accompanied by an affidavit from a DNA analyst who said the evidence would likely contain biological materials.
For example  while the definition of biological material fit for testing included skin cells   Swearingen  still couldnât confirm that skin cells existed on the pantyhose used to strangle Trotter or on the clothes  she  was wearing. And having a DNA analyst say such materials would likely be there was not enough. âWe have explicitly held that appellee must prove biological material exists and not that it is merely probable â the court wrote.
But in order to definitively prove that microscopic evidence exists  you have to test for it  notes Bryce Benjet  a staff attorney with the Innocence Project and one of  the lawyers handling Swearingenâs case . It was a frustrating conclusion  if not an impossible standard to meet.
answer:

no