In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

[EX Q]: Comment: The Taliban is the same terrorist organization that entered a peaceful community opposed to their governance and hanged the 8 year old son of the village leader. This happened about seven years ago and was reported by this e-paper. Murdering a young female child of a prisoner would fall within the base behaviour of the Taliban.  They also bomb men, women, and children indiscriminately. I would going about arranging a fatweh type decree against the perpetrators of this unspeakable crime, were I a Muslin father.  This murdered child was Canadian/American as well.
[EX A]: Non-sexual-explicit

[EX Q]: Comment: It's the Republican ethos--"just grab 'em by the pussy"--and the rich get what they want at the expense of everything and everyone else.
[EX A]: Sexual-explicit

[EX Q]: Comment: According to the main insurance companies of mainline Protestant churches, all denominations register about the same data in regard to the crime of child sexual abuse among clergy and lay people. The problem in the past, however, was that CC bishops moved predator clerics from parish to parish, assigning them arbitrarily to these parishes, without alerting parishioners (and often times even the pastor) to the danger, to the predatory nature of these clerics. That was horrendous.
[EX A]:
Sexual-explicit