TASK DEFINITION: We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.
PROBLEM: Sent1: I would support the death penalty IF there was a way to ensure that it would not put innocent people to death.
 Sent2: "We know for a FACT that innocent people have been put to death already"- then give me their names.

SOLUTION: Not similar

PROBLEM: Sent1: The comparison is no bridge to the death penalty, however, because there is nothing gained by seeing a person fried to death as opposed to seeing them fade away in a prison cell for the rest of their life.
 Sent2: For some people death penalty is better than life in prison, who are respect their freedom and who are consider that it is better to die than someone to judge them.

SOLUTION: Not similar

PROBLEM: Sent1: Some innocent people are still sentenced to death, and that's where I see a problem.
 Sent2: I would support the death penalty IF there was a way to ensure that it would not put innocent people to death.

SOLUTION:
Similar