The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.

Input: Consider Input: Context: 'Hmm, I need food too. I am willing to split. I will give you 2 food since you claimed it first. Can I have 2 waters then?' 'That's fair, but I have wiggle room on the water, how about I take two food, two firewood and you take 3 water, 1 food, 1 firewood?' 'Is there anyway you will go with that I get two firewood? I need food the most but since you get most of that can I get most of the firewood? So 1 food, 2 firewood, and 2 water for me?'
Utterance: 'You drive a hard bargain. I could really use that firewood. It's going to get cold tonight and these sleeping bags are not worth the price I paid ;)'

Output: Yes


Input: Consider Input: Context: 'I can also understand your family situation. I'll give 1 package of water.🙂' 'That works for me.🙂 Are you able to share the food if I give you 1 firewood?' 'I think our dealing is going good. You take all the firewood.As I already said, I have some health issue.  Can you help me with the food?'
Utterance: 'Sounds good I will give you the 2 packages of food.🙂'

Output: No


Input: Consider Input: Context: 'Yes I think that sounds fair.' 'So if I take 2 foods and 1 firewood, you take 1 food and 2 firewood. What would be fair for water?' 'What if I take two waters and you take one water then?'
Utterance: 'I think that sounds fair, since you compromised on food. Sounds like a deal!'


Output: No