Given a document, find the main entity about whom the author is writing. Write the full name if mentioned in the text. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

Example Input: Anti-Trump steam rolling from his ears? Check.
Anyway   Trump  was unfazed. Smiled and gave a thumbs up.
Of the 33 questions asked  21 obsessed over infighting among Republicans upset at  Trump .
Remarkably  there was actually one question about the Clinton conspiracy with Russia to give 1/5 of America’s uranium to our greatest nuclear rival. But nothing about the Clinton conspiracy with Russia to dig up dirt on  Trump  during the election.
Example Output: Anti-Trump

Example Input: This week    Melania Trump  found  herself  in yet another fashion scandal.  The first lady  was spotted boarding a plane to Texas in sky-high stilettos  though  she  was heading to an area devastated by Hurricane Harvey. Public perception of  Trump  and  her  immediate predecessor  Michelle Obama  couldn't be more different. Fans of Obama paint  her  as a J. Crew-clad woman of the people. Meanwhile   Trump  was slammed for a photo shoot in which  she  twirled a string of diamonds like spaghetti. For fans of  Trump   glitzy designer clothing is part of  her  appeal. Instagram accounts with thousands of followers track her every outfit. The far-right website Breitbart News  which criticized Obama for wearing a $2 290 dress to meet the pope in 2015  wrote that  Trump  was the "breakout star" of President Donald Trump's first trip abroad  radiating "high fashion." To see how accurate  Melania Trump's  frivolous  filthy-rich reputation is in contrast to Obama's more down-to-earth image  we decided to re-create a theoretical "week in the life" of the two first ladies. We wanted to see whether  Trump  was actually spending more than Obama  or whether  she  was just a victim of bad press. We compared seven iconic looks that Obama and  Trump  wore to similar events  from vacationing to campaigning  as well as their price tags. Fashion can be a strategic way for the first lady to send a message to the American people — and  Trump  and Obama both have different reputations and messages to send. Here's how the two first ladies measure up and what it means for how Americans see them. View As: One Page Slides
Campaigning at political conventions  Melania Trump at the Republican National Convention: $2 190 Roksanda dress and $675 Christian Louboutin heels .  Trump  made headlines after buying a Roksanda "Margot" dress from Net-a-Porter. The $2 190 dress sold out less than an hour after her speech. She paired the dress with $675 Christian Louboutin heels. Michelle Obama at the Democratic National Convention: $995 dress by Christian Siriano and $675 metallic Jimmy Choo heels. Obama's blue dress was extremely similar to a $995 cobalt-blue dress made by Siriano  a designer who rose to prominence after appearing on "Project Runway." Siriano reportedly custom-made the dress Obama wore as she gave her "they go low  we go high" speech. Her silver Jimmy Choo heels  spotted by Footwear News  cost $675.
Meeting with  foreign leaders Melania Trump  at the G-7 summit: $53 130 Dolce & Gabbana outfit.  Trump  made headlines when  she  wore a $51 500 Dolce & Gabbana jacket to a meeting with the spouses of some of the most powerful world leaders at the annual G-7 summit in Catania  Italy  in May. While we couldn't identify the first lady's dress and shoes   her  bag was also Dolce & Gabbana and costs $1 630. The first lady has worn Dolce & Gabbana on numerous occasions. The designer Stefano Gabbana has been extremely receptive of the support  posting many pictures of Trump in Dolce & Gabbana outfits on his Instagram. Michelle Obama at the G-20 summit: $474 J. Crew outfit. Obama also made headlines on her first trip to the United Kingdom as the first lady in 2009  thanks to her casual yet fashionable looks. The Guardian described her outfits  many of which were from J. Crew  as "a pitch of sunny  homely optimism  rather than sparkling glamour." One of Obama's most memorable outfits of the trip was the one she wore to meet British Prime Minister Gordon Brown. Fox News reported that the cardigan cost $298  the tank top $18  and the mint-green pencil skirt $158.
 Charity work Melania Trump at an abuse-prevention nonprofit: $1 150 pair of sandals to complete an otherwise low-key look . Footwear News reported (somewhat snarkily) that  Trump  wore a $1 150 pair of Rene Caovilla sandals to visit HomeSafe in April.  Trump  also wore a $225 pair of L'Agence Margot jeans and an unidentified khaki shirt. Michelle Obama at a food bank: $540 pair of sneakers to complete an otherwise low-key look. In 2009  Obama caused some controversy when she wore a $540 pair of Lanvin sneakers to volunteer at a food bank with Jill Biden. She paired them with a $188 J. Crew sweater.
Joint addresses to  Congress Melania Trump  at a 2017 joint address to Congress: $5 000 Michael Kors suit jacket.  Trump 's Michael Kors look cost an estimated $9 600  combining a black blazer that cost $5 000 and a matching skirt priced at $4 600. Michelle Obama at the 2015 State of the Union: $1 595 Michael Kors suit jacket. In 2015  Obama wore a suit that had been featured on CBS's political drama "The Good Wife." The $1 595 jacket quickly sold out after the first lady wore it to the State of the Union address.
 Vacation Melania Trump 's return from Camp David: $303 J. Crew and J Brand.  Trump  recently proved that Obama wasn't the only first lady getting clothes from J. Crew. In late August   she  returned from Camp David wearing a $75 pink top from the retailer. Yahoo Style reported that  she  paired the top with $228 pink J Brand jeans and pink patent-leather flats that we couldn't trace (though Vanity Fair reports they're Manolo Blahniks). Michelle Obama exiting Air Force One in shorts: ? Obama faced serious backlash after being spotted leaving Air Force One for a hike of the Grand Canyon in 2009 wearing shorts. Four years later  Obama called the shorts incident one of her biggest fashion regrets. While Time notes that no brand ever "stepped forward" to claim the "unflattering" shorts  the entire outfit looks very J. Crew. In any case  it's safe to say it wasn't too expensive.
Inauguration — and why the numbers don't tell the full story  Trump 's fashion picks tend to be more expensive than Obama's. But that's not the full story. First  there's the question of custom-made dresses. For the past three inaugurations  the first lady wore a custom-made look. (Obama wore Jason Wu both times  and  Trump  wore a Herve Pierre gown.)  Trump  has reportedly struggled to find designers willing to work with  her . Meanwhile  many of Obama's most iconic looks are made specifically for  her  and are priceless  such as a custom-made Versace gown with a theoretical price tag of $12 000. Then there's the question of why it even matters. First ladies' outfits are not paid for with taxpayer dollars. You could be horrified that anyone could buy a coat that costs more than the average American makes in a year. But if you're going to criticize  Trump  for wearing $1 000 shoes  you have to criticize Obama as well.  Melania Trump's  2017 Inauguration Ball gown: priceless  custom-made Herve Pierre. Michelle Obama's 2013 Inauguration Ball gown: priceless  custom-made Jason Wu.
Example Output: Melania Trump

Example Input: Dr .  Shulkin  is one of several cabinet secretaries to be accused of lavish spending on travel . Tom Price was dismissed as secretary of health and human services over his use of private jets . Within hours of the report ’ s release   a few Republican lawmakers were calling for Dr .  Shulkin  to resign . But others in Congress and at influential veterans ’ organizations stopped short of that   condemning misuse of funds but reaffirming their support for the secretary . “ A lot of them don ’ t know what to do — they may want him to go   but who would replace him ?” said Paul Rieckhoff   founder of Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America . “ What they get in his place may be very disruptive .” The Department of Veterans Affairs offered only a brief defense of Dr . Shulkin ’ s trip on Wednesday   saying in a statement : “ As  Secretary Shulkin  points out    he  travels far less than any recent V . A . secretary   takes no private jets   and was the first cabinet secretary to post details of his travel online for all to see . That said   accountability and transparency are important values at V . A . under President Trump .” But Dr . Shulkin personally pushed back hard against the findings . “ The report is not accurate   not objective  ” he said in an interview on Wednesday . “ I was horrified when I saw the way the investigator conducted himself   leading the witness with his own interpretation and the bias .” He said the department usually has weeks to review and respond to reports   but he had only two working days . Newsletter Sign Up Continue reading the main story Please verify you ' re not a robot by clicking the box . You must select a newsletter to subscribe to . Sign Up You agree to receive occasional updates and special offers for The New York Times ' s products and services . View all New York Times newsletters . In an unusual 28 - page rebuttal attached to the report by his lawyers   Dr . Shulkin included findings from an independent ethics expert   affidavits from witnesses who contradicted the report   and transcripts of interviews conducted by the investigators that the lawyers said showed bias . The department ’ s chief of staff   Vivieca Wright Simpson   also disputed the findings . The report found that in seeking approval for the secretary ’ s wife   Dr . Merle Bari   to take the trip at public expense   Ms . Wright Simpson misrepresented to the department ’ s ethics office that a planned “ special recognition dinner ” was definite . Wright Simpson ’ s false representations and alteration of an official record may have violated federal criminal statutes  ” the report said   adding that the inspector general had referred the matter to the Justice Department for possible prosecution . The department declined to prosecute . Advertisement Continue reading the main story Ms . Wright Simpson said in an interview on Wednesday that the dinner she mentioned in the email had in fact taken place . She said she was not given any chance to see the inspector general ’ s report or respond to it before its release   despite requests through her lawyer . The report said the secretary and his wife improperly accepted the Wimbledon tickets from Victoria Gosling   an organizer of the 2016 Invictus Games   which brought together wounded veterans for competition . The tickets ’ face price was about $ 350   but their resale value   according to the report   was about $ 3   500 . Accepting such a gift violated ethics standards   according to the report . It recommended that the secretary repay the cost of the tickets and reimburse the government for his wife ’ s travel . Dr .  Shulkin  said  he  would comply with recommendations   but maintained that  he  had done nothing improper .  He  said Ms . Gosling was a personal friend who offered the couple her sister ’ s unused tickets   and that there was nothing unethical in accepting them .  He  said Ms . Wright Simpson ’ s conduct will be investigated   “ and if it reveals she did something wrong   we will take action .” The members of Congress in charge of the committees that oversee the department — Senators Johnny Isakson of Georgia and Jon Tester of Montana   and Representatives Phil Roe of Tennessee and Tim Walz of Minnesota — issued a joint statement expressing disappointment at the allegations detailed in the report . “ We believe that public officials must be held to a higher standard   and whether intentional or not   misusing taxpayer dollars is unacceptable  ” they said in the statement . “ We ’ re counting on Dr . Shulkin to actively address all of the allegations outlined in this report .”
Example Output:
Shulkin