Categorize the comment on the basis of severe toxicity. If the comment is severely toxic output Yes, otherwise output No.

Guestsquared:  It's really too bad you can't manage to discuss an issue without inserting one or more personal insults.  Again, may I suggest disagreeing with you on this issue or any other does make a person, ipso facto, "ill-informed." I could reply with a like comment and we could waste time and energy exchanging insults.  I'm not interested in doing that. 

 We know, although you and the others who support this law will never acknowledge it,  that it was specifically written to "discourage" panhandling by punishing anyone who donats to panhandlers from a car.   This ban, of course, eliminates the primary source of contributions to panhandlers. It's designed to give Springfield panhandlers the "bum's rush", while hopefully passing the test of its Constitutionality.  It may be supported by the Courts, it may not be.  As I've repeatedly said, that is the Courts' responsibility.  We'll likely get to see how it "plays out."
No

Alexander Durban--You have so much to eat you can REFUSE to eat animal protein out of some misguided, maudlin delusion of "love" for other species.  But you turn a cold-shoulder of indifference to millions of crying, starving human babies whose families would give anything they have or do anything they were asked to get just a little milk to assuage the screaming hunger in their children's bellies because you're all weepy over COWS???

I'll tell you what I told the last "animal liberation" imbecile whose whiny tripe received undue attention on these pages: we are omnivores.  Come tell one of our big brownies to "honor motherhood" by not eating a moose calf or ripping roe out of a mama salmon's belly.  Go 'head.  Natural selection is always on the lookout for the weak and stupid--it'll cure all your ills, and the space, oxygen and resources wasted on simpletons like you can go to a more deserving member of our species.
Yes

So this should be true for tobacco smokers also.

No