We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Input: Consider Input: Sent1: To expect strict gun control laws to have any effect, in and of themselves, in a nation with 300,000,000 guns in private hands is ridiculous.
 Sent2: In some states, some guns are just not allowed and it sticks as a law.

Output: Not similar


Input: Consider Input: Sent1: If gun control will not affect criminal ownership of guns and people will always be able to get a firearm if they want, why should a government make the effort to ban firearms as a precursor to atrocities?
 Sent2: Some people who want to ban guns try to use simplistic arguments to suggest that murder rates are tied to the number of guns available for criminal misuse; and they suggest more guns = more crime and less guns = less crime.

Output: Not similar


Input: Consider Input: Sent1: Which is why the ban is a bit of a poor compromise, they've banned guns for law abiding people but they've not done enough to make sure criminals don't have them.
 Sent2: That most people can't be trusted, so we should have more laws against guns, which most people will abide by because they can be trusted.


Output: Not similar