Categorize the comment on the basis of toxicity. If the comment is toxic (harmful, malicious, derogatory, threat, insult, identity attck, etc.) output Yes, otherwise output No.

Input: Consider Input: Bassacward thinking. Limit the pay of the supervised, will save money. Increasing pay of Supervisors cost more. This would not survive a voters referendun

Output: No


Input: Consider Input: Silly, it is because you do not have science behind the big wind in your sails. So if you have both a penis and vagina is your choice a "you" pick? Did you know that if God created humans he made a lot of humans with some major differences in designs. Check out the Vrolik Medical Museum in Amsterdam, they have an extensive collection of how God played around with his human design and should point out to humans that all humans are not created equal that there is no cutter design that God uses in his works. So having a set of genitals that does not match to the sex that you feel you are is by no means out of God's creative genius. For the sort of folks who are not deeply religious substitute "nature" for "God".

Output: Yes


Input: Consider Input: The fact of the matter is this, the attorneys for the plaintiffs in this case are part of a law firm that gave almost $700,000 to the Clintons and Obama over the last few years. And That the Latino judge hearing this case and his fellow Latinos in the local laRazza'S group are likely to disagree with trumps "build the wall" part of this platform even somebody with the brain of a gerbil could see that.

The fact of the matter is that very few people indeed could care less about a lawsuit brought by a few underachieving Trump University attendees who weren't able to replicate trumps success after taking the coursework that he loaned his name to.


Output: No