In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

[EX Q]: Comment: Why do people here have a problem with honking while driving? I grew up here... I honk if people are sitting at a green light or stopping in the middle of the road because they are lost. (Pull over and figure out where you are going.) Every so often when I discover I was not paying attention and the light turned green and no one honked I wonder why, and would have appreciated a little notification... It happens. It's not a "fuck you," it's just to say "hey, earth to driver, let's get going."
[EX A]: Obscene

[EX Q]: Comment: While it's true both sides are being divisive, I suspect Mountain Peaks picked a couple of right-wing names because it's easier to twist RW rhetoric into something negative than it is LW positions.
With just a few words, you can make the Right sound heartless or that they're sucking up to the rich or that they don't care about the environment, and so on. If I were a Russian troll intent on tearing Americans apart, I would do it from the right side, just because it's so much easier (unless it's about gun control; then the left is easier to pick on).
You can pick out the real right-wing people here because they're responses sound sane. Posters like Sylvia Wyss and Obama-Sin-Laden sound like their main purpose is to piss off lefties. And while there are lefties that piss off righties, it's harder to do because lefties say things like, "Save the children or the deer or the rivers." Hard to twist that sort of thing into something negative.
[EX A]: Non-obscene

[EX Q]: Comment: SB91 was a way to reduce prison populations and save money, but is costing us by creating more crime. 

Lock up more criminals and you reduce crime by simply getting more thugs off the streets. Then pay for more prisons with work programs, like chain gangs to build roads, fill pot holes, work slime lines in prison canneries or floating prison processor ships. (they were turning back fisherman this summer because there weren't enough processing workers.   They could make license plates, make Alaska Grown shirts and hoodies, sell convict brand jeans made in Alaska.  There are lots of souvenirs they could make that would sell well because you can't find much made here. 

Another benefit would be a skill when they got out. You would use the low level criminals that are let out under SB91 and make them work without any danger to society.
[EX A]:
Non-obscene