In this task, you're given a statement, and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence clearly disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3' corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.

Statement: It means that instead of blandly assuming less regulation is better than more or more competition is better than less, you have to study the specifics of each case very carefully. Choices:  1. Studying the specifics of every case is what it means. 2. If you don't study the specifics, you won't get it right. 3. There's no need to study the specifics, not at all.
3

Statement: There seemed to be a never-ending set of obstacles, said Patrick Pleas, an attorney with Northwest Justice Project.  Choices:  1. There was a never-ending set of obstacles. 2. There were no obstacles. 3. Patrick Pleas is an attorney with Northwest Justice Project.
2

Statement: and we didn't ever call it uh Cokes and such you know we call it soda Choices:  1. We call it soda, not Cokes. 2. We call it soda or pop but never Cokes. 3. We always call it Coke.

3