Craft one correct answer to the question given in input. To make it more interesting, try to use non-stereotypical language if possible. Make sure your correct answer is reasonably long, consistent with the context, and requires common sense (instead of explicit extraction from the context.) In your answer, use as few words as possible from the given context. Use a response that is uncommon/non-stereotypical, so that it is less predictable. To be less repetitive, please vary your language for each question.
--------
Question: Context: In addition , due to her crap memory , I have comprimised my Friends Only policy and made this post public due to the fact that she forgot the password to her LJ account . Jolene and I are attempting to systemetically tear down her ego because she is so very disgusting . 
Question: Why is the narrator so upset at the subject they 're talking about ?

Answer: The narrator believes the subject has a poor memory and is a bad friend .


Question: Context: Then picked him up and went home . Went out for a few hours ... came home and cleaned in preparation for tomorrow . I have so much ... shit for my dorm . It 's getting rediculous . Got Outback takeout for dinner lol . 
Question: What may happen to them tomorrow ?

Answer: They will move into their dorm .


Question: Context: What makes the optimistic lines so interesting to me is that I do n't think I was actually thinking about what I meant ; I was probably just trying to reach a satisfactory ( or simply satisfying ) ending . Endings are weird . One of the first plays I wrote -- the first that was actually performed -- builds to an ending that does n't actually arrive . My way of thinking was perhaps ( it 's hard to know , exactly ) that the protagonist got a look at the way the world was going , and saw the consequences of his set of values ( short - term strong morals , long - term ambivalence ) . 
Question: What hobby does the narrator seem to have ?

Answer:
They love acting .