We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gay Marriage)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Input: Consider Input: Sent1: If inclusion of same sex couples being allowed to marry is what you call "redefining", then the inclusion of interracial couples would also be a "redefiniton."
 Sent2: If same sex "marriage" and not civil unions are allowed, then precedence will have been set for redefining marriage.

Output: Not similar


Input: Consider Input: Sent1: And of course the unspoken result of gay marriage will be the demand that all forms of perversions of traditional marriages must now be allowed because the precedent has been set with same sex marriages.
 Sent2: If same sex "marriage" and not civil unions are allowed, then precedence will have been set for redefining marriage.

Output: Similar


Input: Consider Input: Sent1: People secure in their heterosexual identity or way of life, have nothing to concern themselves with if gays are being accepted.
 Sent2: If two people should be allowed to "do their own business" in peace than why not gays?


Output: Not similar