Categorize the comment on the basis of severe toxicity. If the comment is severely toxic output Yes, otherwise output No.

Input: Consider Input: Someone asked, and yet again racism is at play, if white children should be adopted by white folks. Yeah, why not. But recent events have allowed white people to adopt and take in as foster children, kids of Native parents and there were LONG lines at the DFYS taking advantage. Why? MONEY. When a Native child is placed in a non-Native home, the payment for care doubles. Another add-on is something called "cultural difference" stipend. So white folks got more money to "care" for Native kids than Native people. Money talks, BS walks. Hence the long list of white folks on the rolls. Yeppers.

Output: Yes


Input: Consider Input: The other question that some of the Democrats need to look at is the fact that Hillary, unlike Obama, doesn't have any 'coat tails' to drag other Senatorial and House Candidates into office on if she can't energize anybody but the old hippy legions.  Bernie might just be able to do that if he, like Obama, can get out the young voters, including some of those independents who will actually decide a lot of contests.

Output: No


Input: Consider Input: Bob Weinstein you have made your point many, many times and duly noted. Reinbold needs to lead by example. Talking the talk and not walking that walk is flim-flam. I don't know of any move that she has made to get the legislative budget under control. This was traditionally a part-time legislature years ago. Senator Jalmar Kertula and others such as Clem Tillion would get of of Juneau and go home and farm or fish. This thing has morphed into a full-time paid legislature. The Governor in this State was given extraordinary powers to manage, not be micro-managed.


Output: No