We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

Would you really want a public with an armed force of unknown size, strength, mobilty, location, organizational structure and intention anywhere in your country?
Valid

I would argue, for example, that since so called ���assault weapons��� are not as common today as handguns then they must be more ���dangerous and unususal��� and therefore more subject to a ban.
Valid

Owning a gun is a safety precaution, just like locking your door at night.

Valid