In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: threat and non-threat. Threat is a statement that someone will be hurt or harmed, especially if the person does not do something in particular.

Q: Comment: The Church does not, and should not, condone sinful behavior as something good. This stance in no way can be equated with what Mateen did to these people at Pulse. That action was driven by hate, and hate alone.

This goes to a larger piece which addressed this ideological hate with rallies across the country this past weekend. The Left reflexively came to the defense of shariah adherent ideologues who have no problem killing homosexuals. In fact, they take it as a duty. WHY?

A: Threat
****
Q: Comment: Muslims need culling, they breed like mice and won't use birth control.

A: Threat
****
Q: Comment: You're incapable of reading. I do not "defend nazis"

What i do defend is the constitution. And for the record, nazis were wiped out...what u see now are sympathizers. Unless of course, they are secretly being funded by an underground german workers party...they are illogical Americans...like you.

What happens when your right to hold personal views is not protected because it shares similarities with an archaic view no longer mainstream?

They have a right to assemble and a right to free speech, does not mean i have to listen to them nor follow their beliefs. Congratulations, you learned a rudimentary distinction of rights vs beliefs.

A:
Non-threat
****