In this task, you will be shown a sentence, and you should determine whether it is overruling or non-overruling. In law, an overruling sentence is a statement that nullifies a previous case decision as a precedent by a constitutionally valid statute or a decision by the same or higher ranking court which establishes a different rule on the point of law involved. Classify your answers into overruling or non-overruling

Input: Consider Input: to the extent that either naifeh or dimauro might be construed to stand for the proposition that the district courts lack jurisdiction to consider appeals from refusal by the board to grant a medical license, those opinions are expressly overruled.

Output: overruling


Input: Consider Input: to the extent that busot v. busot, 354 so.2d 1255 (fla.2d dca 1978); clemons v. morris, 350 so.2d 519 (fla. 4th dca 1977); hall v. air force finance center, department of the air force of the united states, 344 so.2d 1340 (fla. 1st dca 1977); and decastro v. decastro, 334 so.2d 834 (fla.3d dca 1976), are inconsistent with this decision, they are disapproved.

Output: overruling


Input: Consider Input: musser davis land co. v union pac. res., 201 f.3d 561, 563, (5th cir. 2000) (citing exxon corp. v. crosby-miss res., ltd., 154 f.3d 202, 205 (5th cir. 1998)).


Output: non-overruling