In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: insult and non-insult. Insult is any lanugage or act that is disrespectful or scornfully abusive.

[EX Q]: Comment: It's been quiet these last few  weeks and people forgot all the bloodshed for Islam.  But now that this is over, let the trucks do their smashing and the bombers do their demolition.  The real war on France is only just beginning.
[EX A]: Non-insult

[EX Q]: Comment: Ross is a bully, just like his boss. 

He is engaging in a war of words in the hopes of convincing Canada and Mexico to give in quickly when negotiations start. Unfortunately for him he has tipped his hand. He does not just want a quick deal, he NEEDS a quick deal. 

The best thing we can do now is not agree to his timetable. No deal by the end of the year.

I personally do not see how we could get to a deal by the end of the year anyway. The terms Ross will offer us will likely be so oppressive that no Canadian politician could accept them without losing their seat and their party's standing in the next election. The same goes for Mexico. 

Negotiations will be protracted unless Ross caves, something he seems disinclined to do. I am not in favor of giving him the semblence of a deal as a face saving jesture. The guy is  jerk.

We had better get ready for a post NAFTA world, just in case.
[EX A]: Insult

[EX Q]: Comment: Are we being a bit masochistic in this fasting fetish? With moderation, of course, what's wrong with religions promoting the theme "eat, drink and be merry! for tomorrow we all die" (with moderation of course! i emphasize :-)...
As an SVD Seminarian we liked the alternative meaning of 'svd': 'Smoke Ve Don't. So Ve Drink." Drinking is healthy. Smoking is not! (for the benefit of cigar-puffing KofCs).
[EX A]:
Non-insult