TASK DEFINITION: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.
PROBLEM: Comment: You don't seem to be a person I care to spend much time on. 

You do know, don't you, that young Hillary was a staff attorney for the House Judiciary Committee? 

Mostly undistinguished, but some claim she was unethical even then.

It's nice you can laugh at your own ignorance. Enjoy.

SOLUTION: Non-sexual-explicit

PROBLEM: Comment: No. You say he's made cakes for gay people before. You claim that as fact. How many has he made?

Nice buzzwords. Sounds to me like this man's faith "triggers" you. Why is it you "SJWs" never want your justice for the Christians?

SOLUTION: Non-sexual-explicit

PROBLEM: Comment: Correction:

Neither one of them "took off" in Alaska. Only having 3 electorals, and our time zone, it is useless. We still like our voice heard. 
But like I said before, this election is like picking between two turds based off smell.

Lastly, i see far more trump signs than i do hillary. I don't like trump but i'll tell you, he has less dirt on him for someone who HASN'T been groomed for politics than the ridiculous Hillary. I wish there was a "none of the above" option at the ballot.

SOLUTION:
Non-sexual-explicit