In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

Q: Sentence: Bob paid for Charlie's college education, but now Charlie acts as though it never happened. He is very hurt.
 Reason: The 'He' refers to bob because Bob was hurt for the behavior of Charlie. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

A: Correct
****
Q: Sentence: Paul tried to call George on the phone, but he wasn't available.
 Reason: The 'he' refers to george because George was likely the one not reachable. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

A: Correct
****
Q: Sentence: The trophy doesn't fit into the brown suitcase because it is too large.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the trophy because it's more likely for the brown suitcase to be to small in order to fit the trophy inside. IF it was the trophy it wouldn't make sense. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

A:
Wrong
****