The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.

Input: Consider Input: Context: 'i think i should have 2 waters because i will need to put the fire out to protect the forest.' 'Well, if we can't settle on an agreement i'm going to walk away. We agreed I will get all 3 extra packages of the food but I still wish for the 2 extra wood and 2 extra waters' 'no we agree that you would get 3 food, i would get 3 waters'
Utterance: 'It's agreed, I will get 3 extra packs of food, you will get 3 waters but the extra wood for my kids is needed how about I get 2 extra firewood?'

Output: Yes


Input: Consider Input: Context: 'IF I can't get 2 pieces of firewood, I will walk away' 'oh that is too bad. I feel the same way.😮' 'Sorry we could not come to a agreement, I am walking away'
Utterance: 'OK. I am sorry it has to come to this. I really need the firewood as much as you do to keep warm as it is very cold where I am for this time of the year.'

Output: No


Input: Consider Input: Context: 'Hello, I'd like to get all of the water, an extra firewood and 2 of the food' 'Hi there.  That hardly leaves me with anything and doesn't really work for me.  I was hoping to make a campsite feast and get the extra food.  If we can do that, I'd be happy to give you all the water and that extra firewood.'
Utterance: 'I am a big guy, so I will need some more food, how about you give me an extra food while you hold on to two'


Output: No