In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.

Q: Sentence: Sam took French classes from Adam, because he was known to speak it fluently.
 Reason: The 'he' refers to adam because Sam was eager to put to practice what he learnt. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

A: Wrong
****
Q: Sentence: As Ollie carried Tommy up the long winding steps, his legs ached.
 Reason: The 'his' refers to ollie because his legs dangled As Ollie carried Tommy up the long winding steps,. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

A: Wrong
****
Q: Sentence: Bob was playing cards with Adam and was way ahead. If Adam hadn't had a sudden run of good luck, he would have won.
 Reason: The 'he' refers to bob because he got sudden run of good luck or else he would have lost. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 

A:
Wrong
****