instruction:
Given a document, find the main entity about whom the author is writing. Write the full name if mentioned in the text. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].
question:
LONDON (AP) — A British judge is set to decide Tuesday whether to quash or uphold an arrest warrant for  WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange  who has spent more than five years evading the law inside Ecuador's London embassy .
 Assange 's lawyers argue that it's no longer in the public interest to arrest him for jumping bail in 2012 and seeking shelter in the embassy to avoid extradition to Sweden  where prosecutors were investigating allegations of sexual assault and rape made by two women. He denied the allegations.
Swedish prosecutors dropped their investigation last year  saying there was no prospect of bringing  Assange  to Sweden in the foreseeable future. But the British warrant for violating bail conditions still stands  and  Assange  faces arrest if  he  leaves the embassy.
 Assange 's lawyers asked for the warrant to be withdrawn since Sweden no longer wants  him  extradited  but  the judge  rejected their request last week.
 Assange 's attorney went on to argue that arresting  him  is no longer proportionate or in the public interest. Lawyer Mark Summers said that the 5½ years  Assange  has spent inside the embassy were "adequate  if not severe" punishment for his actions  and cited a report by a U.N. committee which said the 46-year-old was being arbitrarily detained.
He said the fact remained that  Assange  had chosen to enter the embassy to avoid arrest 
Even if the judge lifts the British arrest warrant   Assange 's legal problems may not be over. He suspects there is a secret U.S. grand jury indictment against him for WikiLeaks' publication of classified documents  and that American authorities will seek his extradition
answer:
Julian Assange


question:
If  Corey   Crawford âs âupper-bodyâ injury keeps  him  out the rest of the season  which was a possibility indicated by Sportsnetâs Elliotte Friedman  then the Blackhawks will have a âlower-standingsâ issue.
When  Crawford  was placed on the injured list on Dec. 27  the Hawks were two points behind the Wild for the second wild-card spot  but held two games in hand.
Without  Crawford   the Hawks have gone 5-4-1 and find themselves three points behind the eighth-seeded Kings  who also have a game in hand.
To recap  their lot without  Crawford  has become worse  and it could get a lot worse if  he  continues to suffer from vertigo again as reported by the Chicago Sun-Times.
 Crawford  has been the Hawksâ best player this season  and itâs not even close.  He  won a lot of games by  himself  when  his  teammates proved inept or inert.  His  play had been Vezina Trophy-worthy  and even now  his  .929 save percentage ranks third in the league while  his  2.27 goals-against average stands fifth overall.
It seems impossible to imagine the Hawks trading for  another Crawford  and they donât have an extra one handy. Jeff Glass has a better backstory than a future as a playoff goalie from what Iâve seen. Anton Forsberg seems earnest and talented  but his goals-against average is more than a half-goal worse than Crawfordâs  which is a bad thing for a once-dominant team that sadly sometimes canât score even a half-goal a game. See Sundayâs shutout-loss-tank-job against the dreaded Red Wings at home on Sunday.
The long-range view goes only to Feb. 26. Thatâs the trade deadline. The Hawks will play 18 games before then and have a little more than five weeks to get some good news on  Crawford .
3 goalies the Blackhawks could pursue if Corey Crawford is out for the season Â»
Corey Crawford's injury could last longer than first believed Â»
answer:
Corey Crawford


question:
British Prime Minister Theresa  May leaves 10 Downing Street in central London on Dec. 6  2017  for Prime Ministers Questions in the Houses of Parliament. (Andy Rain/European Pressphoto Agency-Efe/Rex/Shutterstock)
It is obvious that  Prime Minister Theresa May  is no longer negotiating with just the Europeans over Britainâs messy exit from the union. Talks are far tougher at home â where she faces blistering arguments on all sides  including revolt among her own ministers.
More worrying for  May   members of her own Conservative Party challenged her  too  wondering aloud whether she had the resolve to negotiate a tough  decisive exit from the European Union or was getting wobbly under the mounting pressure of deadlines coming next week.
Rees-Mogg was referring to the spectacular meltdown on Monday in Brussels  when  May  was just hours away from presenting a preliminary  Phase 1 kind of deal on exiting the European Union  only to have it snatched away by her coalition partner in government  the tiny Democratic Unionist Party of Northern Ireland.
The unionists  who appear to have been kept mostly in the dark  rebelled at the last minute against vague but still meaningful language from  May  that was designed to maintain an open border between Northern Ireland  which is part of the United Kingdom  and the Republic of Ireland  which is in the E.U.
As  May  was fending off mockery in Parliament  the British political press reported that hard-line Brexiteers in her cabinet  led by Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson  were expressing âgenuine fear â according to the Telegraph newspaper  that May was leading Britain toward a dreaded âsoft Brexit.â
 British Prime Minister Theresa May  and European Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker said Dec. 4 that no deal had been reached in the first phase of Brexit talks. The two said they would reconvene for further talks before the European Council summit on Dec. 15. (The Washington Post)
In Parliament  opposition leader Corbyn began his grilling of the prime minister on Wednesday by quoting  her  trade secretary  Liam Fox  who last summer said Brexit negotiations would be âthe easiest in human history.â
 May  replied  âNegotiations are in progress  and very good progress has been made.â  She  said that only âa couple of thingsâ need to be agreed upon with the Europeans before talks on trade and future relations can begin.
It was not only May in a harsh light  but also  her  Brexit secretary  David Davis  who on Wednesday was accused of misleading Parliament after  he  conceded that  his  government had not done a deep analysis  economic sector by economic sector  on the possible effects of Brexit â even after  his  repeated suggestions that such studies were ongoing.
British Prime Minister Theresa May offers Brexit details in landmark speech
answer:

Theresa May