In this task, you're given a pair of sentences, sentence 1 and sentence 2. Your job is to determine if the two sentences clearly agree/disagree with each other, or if this can't be determined. Indicate your answer as yes or no respectively.

[Q]: Sentence 1: oh that's quite reasonable Sentence 2: That's a good estimate for the area, is there a discount on it?
[A]: no


[Q]: Sentence 1: In those cases where challenges and risks are addressed, agencies use a variety of approacHe's, including setting goals and measures directly linked to the management challenges and program risks, establishing goals and measures that are indirectly related to the challenges and risks, or laying out strategies to address them. Sentence 2: Goals and measures are important and so are the strategies.
[A]: no


[Q]: Sentence 1: It suggests, in particular, that what might seem to a naive commentator like a natural conclusion--if productivity growth in the steel industry reduces the number of jobs for steelworkers, then productivity growth in the economy as a whole reduces employment in the economy as a whole--may well involve a crucial fallacy of composition. Sentence 2: This is an accurate analogy.
[A]:
no