In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence can be inferred from the statement. Incorrect choices change the meaning in important ways or have details that are not mentioned in the statement. Indicate your answer as 1,2, or 3 corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.

Ex Input:
Statement: Participants raised questions about whether the SEC should reconsider the amount and targeting of its civil sanctions and more frequently use other types of remedies, such as criminal sanctions, to hold people accountable for wrongdoing. Choices:  1. Participants believe candles will be a great remedy for criminals. 2. Participants asked questions about different ways to hold criminals accountable for wrongdoing.  3. Participants asked many questions about the death penalty. 

Ex Output:
2


Ex Input:
Statement: But after being forewarned, if it happens again, I'll be hard to convince that you were in the right. Choices:  1. There won't be any issues if it happens again. 2. You will be in a lot of trouble if it happens again. 3. I won't believe you if it happens again.

Ex Output:
3


Ex Input:
Statement: It was a world of anarchy, from your point of view. Choices:  1. The world was orderly and controlled.  2. The world looked unorganized.  3. It was to everyone's great detriment that the world looked so chaotic. 

Ex Output:

2