We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Q: Sent1: The question is should the death penalty be allowed as a form of punishment.
 Sent2: Death penalty should be allowed for those who deserves it.

A: Not similar
****
Q: Sent1: The problem with the death penalty is eventually someone will be sentenced to death when they are in fact guilty.
 Sent2: Acutally, long ago, the executioner was a convict also sentenced to death.

A: Not similar
****
Q: Sent1: And had the death penalty been in effect, those kids might have died.
 Sent2: (Assault would not be one of them unless it caused death or was a sexual assault on a child.)

A:
Not similar
****