instruction:
In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.
question:
Comment: JJ. We're in agreement.....It's their land...But, the "share the view" doesn't sit well.  regards, Gary Crum
answer:
Non-obscene


question:
Comment: No one knows how to gauge te outcome based on the ranked ballot.  But isn't the challenge greater than that?   
Each EDA counts as 100 points and the first candidate to get 16901 points, or more, is the winner.  This means that EDA's with a small number of members carry a lot of weight.  If one candidate has 28% support concentrated in many EDA's with few members, that candidate ha a much better chance than another candidate with 35% support concentrated in a few ridings in the GTA.
This is the same approach the Liberals used to choose Justin Trudeau.  Apparently, he had broad support getting over 80% of the points on the first round.  This time around, it seems like a real crap shoot.
answer:
Obscene


question:
Comment: Outsider:  I fear you miss the point.  No one suggested Mr. trump "discussed" moral equivalency.  The issue involves his engaging in the exercise of moral equivalency in his comments.  

The car killing is hardly a "separate" matter.  It was an action taken against the counter-demonstrators by a supporter of white supremacy.  Would you excuse such an action taken by a supporter of ISIS as a "separate matter undertaken by one person"?  Of cours you wouldn't.... Gary Crum
answer:

Non-obscene