In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

Input: Consider Input: Comment: Take note of the comment section, folks. 

We have a number of left wingers celebrating getting rid of white Christians, but keep in mind they'd scream from the rooftops if they saw someone celebrating the same about brown Muslims or Jewish people.

Output: Identity-attack


Input: Consider Input: Comment: Some do.  Some don't.  Most of the former slave states (i.e., Jesusland) are teeming with white trash.   The basic formula is as follows:  Guns + Bible + Walmart + Budweiser + NFL +Registered Republican = White Trash.

Output: Identity-attack


Input: Consider Input: Comment: What is weird about Trump is that he proposed this as a mere bargaining chip. He does not give a damn about Taiwan per se. He is not doing this on some principle, for example the right of self-determination or whatever you want to concoct.

No, it is simply like a business deal in his brain. Imagine if the Chinese would threaten to support "La Reconquista" or separatism in California in the hope of extracting a better deal with the USA on say canola oil? 

After the vote in California, perhaps the Chinese could donate a few billions to separatists in California..... 

I am happy that the Americans are waking up against the criminal elites like Clinton, it is too bad that the USA did not have a Marine Le Pen instead of that buffoon.


Output: Non-identity-attack