Table:
text: United States Senate special election in Massachusetts, 2010
By county
By county
County Coakley_ Coakley_votes Brown_ Brown_votes Kennedy_ Kennedy_votes
Barnstable 41.7% 43609 57.4% 59990 0.9% 901
Berkshire 68.5% 29847 30.5% 13294 1.0% 443
Bristol 42.8% 71493 56.0% 93474 1.2% 1930
Dukes 64.3% 4915 34.5% 2641 1.2% 92
Essex 42.6% 108336 56.5% 143897 0.9% 2323
Franklin 62.7% 17318 35.7% 9876 1.6% 446
Hampden 44.0% 57813 54.5% 71641 1.5% 1950
Hampshire 61.4% 34770 37.3% 21107 1.3% 712
Middlesex 51.7% 283259 47.4% 259768 0.8% 4627
Nantucket 50.6% 2139 48.0% 2032 1.4% 58
Norfolk 43.6% 120041 55.5% 152784 0.8% 2262
Plymouth 36.6% 49619 62.5% 84680 0.8% 1132
Suffolk 66.2% 115774 32.8% 57350 1.0% 1807
Worcester 37.9% 99803 60.9% 160274 1.2% 3087

Question: What percentage did Kennedy win in the 2010 Massachusetts US Senate special election, while Coakly won 37.9% while in By County?

Question: How many votes did John Kennedy win when Coakley won 66.2% in the 2010 Massachusetts special election to the US Senate by district?

Question: What was the percentage of the vote for Coakley when Kennedy won 1.6% in the 2010 Massachusetts US Senate special election among counties?