Question: What other Linux distribution does the distribution using a runit init system resemble ?

text: Comparison of Linux distributions
Technical
The table below shows the default file system , but many Linux distributions support some or all of ext2 , ext3 , ext4 , Btrfs , ReiserFS , Reiser4 , JFS , XFS , GFS2 , OCFS2 , and NILFS . It is possible to install Linux onto most of these file systems . The ext file systems , namely ext2 , ext3 , and ext4 are based on the original Linux file system . File systems have been developed by companies to meet their specific needs , by hobbyists , or adapted from Unix , Microsoft Windows , and other operating systems . Linux has full support for XFS and JFS , FAT ( the DOS file system ) , and HFS , the main file system for the Macintosh . Support for Microsoft Windows NT 's NTFS file system has been developed and is now comparable with other native Unix file systems . CDs , DVDs , and Blu-ray discs ' ISO 9660 and Universal Disk Format ( UDF ) are supported . Unlike other operating systems , Linux and Unix allow any file system regardless of the medium it is stored on , whether that medium is a magnetic disk , an optical disk ( CD , DVD , etc . ) , a USB flash memory key , or even contained within a file located on another file system . Similarly , many C compilers ( mainly GNU Compiler Collection ( GCC ) ) , init systems ( mainly sysvinit ) , desktop environments and window managers are widely supported .
Technical variations of Linux distributions include support for different hardware devices and systems or software package configurations. Organisational differences may be motivated by historical reasons. Other criteria include security, including how quickly security upgrades are available; ease of package management; and number of packages available. These tables compare notable distribution's latest stable release on wide-ranging objective criteria. It does not cover each operating system's subjective merits, branches marked as unstable or beta, nor compare Linux distributions with other operating systems.
Distribution Default Linux kernel Default file system Default init system Install-time desktop environment or window manager selection Reproducible builds
Alpine Linux Binary blobs ext4 openrc none No
ALT Linux Binary blobs ext3 systemd KDE Plasma Workspaces , Xfce No
Arch Linux Binary blobs none systemd none No
BLAG Linux-libre ext3 sysvinit GNOME No
Bodhi Linux Binary blobs ext4 systemd Moksha ( Enlightenment fork ) No
Canaima Binary blobs ? systemd Cinnamon and MATE No
CentOS Binary blobs xfs systemd GNOME No
Chakra Binary blobs ext4 systemd KDE Plasma Workspaces No
ClearOS Binary blobs ext3 systemd none ( Web based ) No
CoreOS Binary blobs ext4 systemd None No
CrunchBang Linux Binary blobs ext4 sysvinit Openbox No
Damn Small Linux Binary blobs ext3 sysvinit JWM No
Debian By default Linux-libre , but the Debian Project also hosts a non-free repository allowing blobs to be installed optionally . Built with Linux-libre tools ext4 systemd GNOME , KDE , Xfce , LXDE In progress
Devuan Binary blobs ext4 sysvinit Xfce No
Dragora GNU/Linux-Libre Linux-libre ext4 runit Xfce No
dyne : bolic Linux-libre ? systemd GNOME No
Fedora Binary blobs ext4 systemd GNOME ( default Workstation Edition ) , Spins for : KDE Plasma Workspaces , Xfce , LXDE , MATE ( with Compiz ) , Cinnamon , Sugar on a Stick In progress
Funtoo Binary blobs none openrc None No
Gentoo Binary blobs none openrc Awesome , Enlightenment , Fluxbox , GNOME , KDE , LXDE-Meta , Openbox , XBMC and Xfce ( live DVD ) No
gNewSense Debian Linux kernel , and ( unlike Debian ) blobs can not be installed ext3 sysvinit GNOME No