<p>By Kathryn Blackhurst, LifeZette:</p> 
<p>American Spectator Senior Editor John Fund blasted the media for refusing to cover former Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton&#8217;s &#8220;ravings&#8221; claiming that &#8220;voter suppression&#8221; contributed to her Election Day loss, during an interview Wednesday on &#8220;The Laura Ingraham Show.&#8221;</p> 
<p>Fund, a national-affairs columnist for National Review Online, said both Democrats and the mainstream media ridiculed President Donald Trump for claiming that 3 million to 5 million people voted illegally while giving Clinton a complete pass for her claims. Pointing to the Public Interest Legal Foundation&#8217;s Monday report proving that more than 5,556 illegal voters were enrolled across 138 of Virginia&#8217;s counties and cities, Fund claimed that voter fraud is far more substantiated than Clinton&#8217;s claims.</p> &#8220;All they do is yell &#8216;voter suppression!&#8217; But they don&#8217;t have any evidence. They don&#8217;t have any statistics. They don&#8217;t have any of them. All they have are Hillary Clinton&#8217;s ravings.&#8221; 
<p>&#8220;There&#8217;s no evidence that voter ID laws prevent people from voting. What really defeated Hillary Clinton was that in every single swing state, including states that don&#8217;t have voter ID, African-American turnout went down because African-American voters didn&#8217;t particularly like Hillary Clinton,&#8221; Fund said.</p> 
<p>&#8220;What we have is the Democrats actively trying to hide the ball on any attempt to find out if there is voter fraud,&#8221; Fund continued. &#8220;All they do is yell &#8216;voter suppression!&#8217; But they don&#8217;t have any evidence. They don&#8217;t have any statistics. They don&#8217;t have any of them. All they have are Hillary Clinton&#8217;s ravings.&#8221;</p> 
<p>No compatible source was found for this video.</p> 
<p>Fund referred to Clinton&#8217;s recent interview with New York magazine in which she insisted, &#8220;I would have won had I not been subjected to the unprecedented attacks by Comey and the Russians, aided and abetted by the suppression of the vote, particularly in Wisconsin. . . . Whoever comes next, this is not going to end. Republicans learned that if you suppress votes you win.&#8221;</p> 
<p>Declaring this unsubstantiated claim to be utter nonsense, Fund noted that even liberal organizations such as the fact-checking site Snopes, Vox, and Slate have all &#8220;called Hillary&#8217;s assertion that she lost because of voter suppression just a fantasy.&#8221;</p> 
<p>&#8220;But by the way, how much media coverage did you get?&#8221; Fund said.</p> 
<p>Instead, Trump&#8217;s claims of 3 million to 5 million people illegal voters have been getting all the attention.</p> 
<p>&#8220;Trump should have never have said it. It discredits the cause,&#8221; Fund conceded. &#8220;Having said that, the outrage against Trump was perfectly appropriate. But where&#8217;s the outrage at Hillary Clinton coming up with her fantasy about voter suppression with just as little evidence? I don&#8217;t know if anyone in the media &#8230; has talked about it or heard about it.&#8221;</p> 
<p>Pointing once again to Virginia and its resident &#8220;consigliere of the Clinton White House,&#8221; Gov. Terry McAuliffe, Fund noted that he has &#8220;desperately tried to prevent groups like the Public Interest Legal Foundation to go into voter registration rolls and try to find out who has been removed from the rolls in Virginia because&#8221; they were illegally registered to vote when they obtained a driver&#8217;s license.</p> 
<p>&#8220;That would be the evidence that there were non-citizens voting in our elections,&#8221; Fund said. &#8220;Well, McAuliffe sent out a directive to every local election official: Don&#8217;t cooperate with these questions. And it turns out they now have the answers from 138 communities in Virginia. Not the whole state, just part of it, [that] 5,500 non-citizens have been removed from the voter registration rolls in the last 5 years. Over a third of them had been voting.&#8221;</p> 
<p>The real issue, Fund insisted, is former President Barack Obama&#8217;s reluctance to investigate or illegal voting or allow others to investigate whether the country&#8217;s democratic election process had been compromised.</p> 
<p>&#8220;For eight years, state after state asked the Obama administration&#8217;s Department of Homeland Security, &#8216;You have a list of every legal alien in the country, people with green cards, student visas. Please send us the list. All we&#8217;ll do with it is match it with out voter-registration rolls and see if some non-citizens are registering and possibly voting,'&#8221; Fund said.</p> 
<p>&#8220;For eight years the Obama administration refused to turn over those lists, claiming &#8216;privacy&#8217; considerations, which were bogus,&#8221; Fund added. &#8220;The reason why he claimed there is no voter fraud is he&#8217;s actively trying to hide it.&#8221;</p> 
<p>The Trump administration has since set up, by executive order, a commission to investigate voter fraud.</p> 
<p>This article was used with permission from <a href="http://lifezette.com" type="external">LifeZette</a>.</p>
Fund: Hillary’s ‘Ravings’ Are Only Evidence of Voter Suppression