Veterans Affairs Peer Review Neutrality Act of 2023

Bill: 118-hr-5794
Sponsor: full_name: Rep. Dingell, Debbie [D-MI-6]
Introduced: 2023-09-28
Policy area: Armed Forces and National Security
Subjects: Government studies and investigations

Health care quality

Veterans' medical care
Latest action: action_date: 2024-09-23
text: Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 597.

Summaries:

tv_txt: IB Union Calendar No. 597 118th CONGRESS 2d Session H. R. 5794 [Report No. 118–703] IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES September 28, 2023 Mrs. Dingell (for herself and Mr. Bergman ) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs September 23, 2024 Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union and ordered to be printed A BILL To amend title 38, United States Code, to eliminate conflicts of interest in conduct of quality management and administrative investigations by the Veterans Health Administration, and for other purposes.

1. Short title This Act may be cited as the Veterans Affairs Peer Review Neutrality Act of 2023 . 2. Elimination of conflicts of interest in peer review, administrative investigation boards, and factfindings of Veterans Health Administration (a) In general Subchapter II of chapter 73 of title 38, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 7311A the following new section: 7311B. Elimination of conflicts of interest in peer review, administrative investigation boards, and factfindings of Veterans Health Administration (a) Peer review (1) In general Each individual responsible for conducting peer review for quality management of care provided by a health care provider at a medical facility of the Department and each member of a peer review committee with respect to quality management of such care shall withdraw from participation in a case review if— (A) the individual has direct involvement with the care under review; or (B) the individual is unable to conduct an objective, impartial, accurate, and informed review. (2) Neutral assessment of conduct of committee members Each medical facility of the Department shall develop procedures and guidelines for that facility to require that any initial peer review for quality management that is conducted with respect to care provided by a health care provider who is a member of the peer review committee for that facility be evaluated, discussed, and assigned a final level review by a neutral peer review committee at another facility of the Department. (b) Administrative investigation boards and factfindings (1) Knowledge of confidential information Individuals with knowledge of confidential quality assurance information specific to a matter under investigation by an administrative investigation board or factfinder with respect to quality management of care provided by a health care provider at a medical facility of the Department may not— (A) serve on the administrative investigation board or as a factfinder; or (B) disclose such information to an administrative investigation board or a factfinder. (2) Personal interest, involvement, or relationship (A) In general The Secretary shall ensure that each member of an administrative investigative board or factfinder does not have— (i) any personal interest or other bias concerning the investigation being conducted; (ii) direct involvement in matters being investigated; or (iii) a supervisory or personal relationship with the subject of the investigation. (B) Recusal If a potential member of an administrative investigative board or factfinder has a personal interest or other bias concerning the investigation being conducted, direct involvement in matters being investigated, or a supervisory or personal relationship with the subject of the investigation, the potential member shall inform the authority responsible for the investigation and recuse themselves from such matter. . (b) Clerical amendment The table of sections at the beginning of such subchapter is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 7311A the following new item: 7311B. Elimination of conflicts of interest in peer review, administrative investigation boards, and factfindings of Veterans Health Administration. .

September 23, 2024 Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union and ordered to be printed

tv_txt: I 118th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 5794 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES September 28, 2023 Mrs. Dingell (for herself and Mr. Bergman ) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs A BILL To amend title 38, United States Code, to eliminate conflicts of interest in conduct of quality management and administrative investigations by the Veterans Health Administration, and for other purposes.

1. Short title This Act may be cited as the Veterans Affairs Peer Review Neutrality Act of 2023 . 2. Elimination of conflicts of interest in peer review, administrative investigation boards, and factfindings of Veterans Health Administration (a) In general Subchapter II of chapter 73 of title 38, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 7311A the following new section: 7311B. Elimination of conflicts of interest in peer review, administrative investigation boards, and factfindings of Veterans Health Administration (a) Peer review (1) In general Each individual responsible for conducting peer review for quality management of care provided by a health care provider at a medical facility of the Department and each member of a peer review committee with respect to quality management of such care shall withdraw from participation in a case review if— (A) the individual has direct involvement with the care under review; or (B) the individual is unable to conduct an objective, impartial, accurate, and informed review. (2) Neutral assessment of conduct of committee members Each medical facility of the Department shall develop procedures and guidelines for that facility to require that any initial peer review for quality management that is conducted with respect to care provided by a health care provider who is a member of the peer review committee for that facility be evaluated, discussed, and assigned a final level review by a neutral peer review committee at another facility of the Department. (b) Administrative investigation boards and factfindings (1) Knowledge of confidential information Individuals with knowledge of confidential quality assurance information specific to a matter under investigation by an administrative investigation board or factfinder with respect to quality management of care provided by a health care provider at a medical facility of the Department may not— (A) serve on the administrative investigation board or as a factfinder; or (B) disclose such information to an administrative investigation board or a factfinder. (2) Personal interest, involvement, or relationship (A) In general The Secretary shall ensure that each member of an administrative investigative board or factfinder does not have— (i) any personal interest or other bias concerning the investigation being conducted; (ii) direct involvement in matters being investigated; or (iii) a supervisory or personal relationship with the subject of the investigation. (B) Recusal If a potential member of an administrative investigative board or factfinder has a personal interest or other bias concerning the investigation being conducted, direct involvement in matters being investigated, or a supervisory or personal relationship with the subject of the investigation, the potential member shall inform the authority responsible for the investigation and recuse themselves from such matter. . (b) Clerical amendment The table of sections at the beginning of such subchapter is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 7311A the following new item: 7311B. Elimination of conflicts of interest in peer review, administrative investigation boards, and factfindings of Veterans Health Administration. .