Time Off to Vote Act

Bill: 118-hr-5322
Sponsor: full_name: Rep. Cartwright, Matt [D-PA-8]
Introduced: 2023-09-01
Policy area: Government Operations and Politics
Latest action: action_date: 2023-09-01
text: Referred to the House Committee on Education and the Workforce.

Summaries:
action_date: 2023-09-01
action_desc: Introduced in House
text: <p><strong>Time Off to Vote Act </strong></p> <p>This bill requires an employer, upon the request of an employee, to provide the employee with a minimum of two consecutive hours of paid leave in order to vote in a federal election.</p> <p>The employer may determine the two-hour period, excluding any lunch break or other break. </p> <p>Taking such leave shall not result in the employee losing accrued employment benefits.</p> <p>The bill makes it unlawful for an employer to interfere with the right to take such leave or for an employer to discriminate against an employee for taking such leave. Further, the bill makes it unlawful for any employer to retaliate against an employee for (1) opposing any practice made unlawful by this bill; (2) filing a charge, or instituting or causing to be instituted any proceeding, under or related to this bill; or (3) testifying or preparing to testify in an inquiry or proceeding relating to such leave.</p> <p>The bill specifies penalties for employers who violate these provisions.</p>

tv_txt: I 118th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 5322 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES September 1, 2023 Mr. Cartwright (for himself, Ms. Williams of Georgia , Mr. Pocan , Mr. Boyle of Pennsylvania , Mr. Swalwell , Mr. Gallego , Mr. Thompson of Mississippi , Mr. Moulton , Ms. Porter , Mr. Vargas , Mr. Evans , Mr. Schiff , Ms. Lee of California , Mr. Espaillat , Ms. Wilson of Florida , Ms. Jacobs , Mr. Carter of Louisiana , Ms. Clarke of New York , Ms. Moore of Wisconsin , Ms. Scanlon , Ms. Barragán , Ms. Pressley , Ms. Wasserman Schultz , Ms. Kamlager-Dove , Mr. Mullin , Ms. Brown , Mr. Ruppersberger , Ms. Balint , Mr. Doggett , Ms. Sewell , Ms. Crockett , Ms. Jackson Lee , Ms. Norton , Mr. Deluzio , Ms. McClellan , Mr. Grijalva , Ms. Sánchez , Ms. Schakowsky , Mr. Sarbanes , Mr. Nickel , Mr. Jackson of Illinois , Ms. Titus , Ms. McCollum , Mr. Green of Texas , Ms. Tlaib , Mr. Johnson of Georgia , Mr. Bowman , Mr. Cleaver , Mr. Payne , Mr. Krishnamoorthi , Mrs. Watson Coleman , Mr. Blumenauer , Mrs. Cherfilus-McCormick , Mr. Davis of Illinois , Mr. Raskin , Mr. Meeks , Mrs. Napolitano , Ms. Salinas , Mr. Carson , Mr. Trone , Mr. Cohen , and Ms. Velázquez ) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce A BILL To provide employees with a minimum of two consecutive hours of paid leave in order to vote in Federal elections.

1. Short title This Act may be cited as the Time Off to Vote Act . 2. Requirement for two hours paid leave to vote in Federal elections (a) Requirement To provide leave Upon the request of an employee, an employer shall provide to each employee a minimum of two consecutive hours of paid leave on the day of any Federal election in order to vote. (b) Employer right To determine two-Hour period For each employee taking leave under subsection (a), the employer of such employee may specify the hours during which the employee may take such leave, including by requiring that the employee take the leave during a period designated for early voting instead of on the day of the election, as applicable under State law. Any lunch break or other break period may not be included in the two-hour period designated for leave, but may be taken consecutively with the 2-hour period described in subsection (a). (c) No loss of benefits The taking of leave under this section shall not result in the loss of any employment benefit accrued prior to the date on which the leave was taken. (d) Prohibited Acts (1) Interference with rights under this Act It shall be unlawful for any employer to interfere with, restrain, or deny the exercise of or the attempt to exercise, the right to take leave under this Act, or to discriminate against an employee in any manner for taking leave under this Act. (2) Retaliation It shall be unlawful for any employer to discharge or in any other manner discriminate against any individual for— (A) opposing any practice made unlawful by this section; (B) filing any charge, or instituting or causing to be instituted any proceeding, under or related to this section; (C) giving or preparing to give any information in connection with any inquiry or proceeding relating to any leave provided under this section; or (D) testifying or preparing to testify in any inquiry or proceeding relating to any leave provided under this section. (e) Investigative authority The Secretary of Labor shall have investigative authority with respect to the provisions of this subsection in the same manner and under the same terms and conditions as the investigative authority provided under section 106 of the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993 ( 29 U.S.C. 2616 ), and the requirements of section 106 of such Act shall apply to employers under this subsection in the same manner as such requirements apply to employers under section 106 of such Act. (f) Enforcement (1) In general Any employer that violates this Act may be subject to a civil penalty not to exceed $10,000 per violation. Civil penalties shall be assessed by and paid to the Secretary of Labor for deposit into the Treasury of the United States and shall accrue to the United States and may be recovered in a civil action in the name of the United States brought in the United States district court for the district where the violation is alleged to have occurred or where the employer has its principal office. (2) Considerations In assessing a civil penalty under this Act, the Secretary shall give due consideration to the appropriateness of the penalty with respect to the size of the business of the employer being charged, the gravity of the violation, the good faith of the employer, and the history of previous violations. (g) Definitions As used in this Act— (1) the term employee has the meaning given such term in section 3 of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 ( 29 U.S.C. 203 ); and (2) the term employer means any person engaged in commerce or in any industry or activity affecting commerce who employs 25 or more employees during a calendar year, and includes any person who acts, directly or indirectly, in the interest of an employer to any of the employees of such employer and any successor in interest of an employer. In the previous sentence, the terms commerce and industry or activity affecting commerce have the meaning given such terms in section 101(1) of the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993. (h) State and local laws Nothing in this Act shall be construed to supersede any provision of any State or local law that requires an employer to provide leave to an employee, for the purpose of voting in any Federal, State, or municipal election, in an amount greater than that required under this Act, or under terms more beneficial to an employee than those provided under this Act. (i) Effective date This section shall take effect beginning with the first Federal election held after the date of enactment of this Act.