FARM Act

Bill: 118-hr-513
Sponsor: full_name: Rep. Jackson, Ronny [R-TX-13]
Introduced: 2023-01-25
Policy area: Foreign Trade and International Finance
Subjects: Congressional oversight

Federal officials

Government studies and investigations

U.S. and foreign investments
Latest action: action_date: 2023-01-25
text: Referred to the Committee on Financial Services, and in addition to the Committee on Agriculture, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

Summaries:
action_date: 2023-01-25
action_desc: Introduced in House
text: <p><b>Foreign Adversary Risk Management Act or the FARM Act</b></p> <p>This bill places the Secretary of Agriculture on the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States. It also requires the committee to review any investment that could result in foreign control of any U.S. agricultural business.</p> <p>Further, the bill includes agricultural systems and supply chains in the definitions of critical infrastructure and critical technologies for the purposes of reviewing such investments.</p> <p>The Department of Agriculture and the Government Accountability Office must each analyze and report on foreign influence in the U.S. agricultural industry.</p>

tv_txt: I 118th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 513 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES January 25, 2023 Mr. Jackson of Texas (for himself, Ms. Spanberger , Mr. Vicente Gonzalez of Texas , Mr. Sessions , Mrs. Miller of Illinois , Mr. Norman , Ms. Salazar , Mr. Crawford , Mrs. Cammack , Mr. Hern , Mr. Babin , Mr. Pfluger , Mr. Issa , Mr. Nunn of Iowa , Mr. Baird , Mr. Nehls , Mr. Johnson of South Dakota , Mr. Stewart , Mr. Zinke , Mr. Cline , Mr. Costa , Mr. Guest , Mr. Carl , Mr. Moore of Alabama , Mr. Rose , Mr. Ellzey , Mr. Weber of Texas , Mrs. Hinson , Mr. Fallon , Mr. Moylan , Mr. Panetta , Mr. Feenstra , Mr. Finstad , and Mr. Kelly of Mississippi ) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services , and in addition to the Committee on Agriculture , for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned A BILL To amend the Defense Production Act of 1950 to prevent harm and disruption to the United States agriculture industry by protecting against foreign influence over agriculture production and supply chains, and for other purposes.

1. Short title This Act may be cited as the Foreign Adversary Risk Management Act or the FARM Act . 2. Findings Congress finds the following: (1) United States agriculture and supply chains are critical to United States economic success and prosperity, and should each be classified as critical infrastructure and critical technologies. (2) Agriculture is the lifeblood that helps to feed United States families nationwide. As such, food security is a matter of national security and should be a top priority of the United States. (3) To prevent harm to the United States public health sector and to prevent disruption to the United States economy and food supply chains, the increasing influence foreign countries may have on the United States agriculture industry and agriculture supply chains should be mitigated. 3. United States agriculture included in Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (a) Agriculture representative Section 721(k)(2) of the Defense Production Act of 1950 ( 50 U.S.C. 4565(k)(2) ) is amended— (1) by redesignating subparagraphs (H), (I), and (J) as subparagraphs (I), (J), and (K), respectively; and (2) by inserting after subparagraph (G) the following: (H) The Secretary of Agriculture. . (b) Review of agriculture investments by foreign entities Section 721(a)(4) of the Defense Production Act of 1950 ( 50 U.S.C. 4565(a)(4) ) is amended— (1) in subparagraph (A)— (A) in clause (i), by striking ; and and inserting a semicolon; (B) in clause (ii), by striking the period at the end and inserting ; and ; and (C) by adding at the end the following: (iii) any transaction described in subparagraph (B)(vi) that is proposed, pending, or completed on or after the date of the enactment of the Foreign Adversary Risk Management Act . ; and (2) in subparagraph (B), by adding at the end the following: (vi) Any transaction, merger, acquisition, transfer, agreement, takeover, or other arrangement that could result in foreign control of any United States business that is engaged in agriculture and uses agricultural products (as defined in the first section of the Act of July 2, 1926 (44 Stat. 802, chapter 725; 7 U.S.C. 451 )). . (c) Agricultural supply chains included in critical infrastructure Section 721(a)(5) of the Defense Production Act of 1950 ( 50 U.S.C. 4565(a)(5) ) is amended— (1) by striking critical infrastructure means and inserting the following: critical infrastructure — (i) means ; (2) by striking the period at the end and inserting ; and ; and (3) by adding at the end the following: (ii) includes, subject to regulations prescribed by the Committee, agricultural systems and supply chains. . (d) Agricultural supply chains included as critical technologies Section 721(a)(6)(A) of the Defense Production Act of 1950 ( 50 U.S.C. 4565(a)(6)(A) ) is amended by adding at the end the following: (vii) Agricultural supply chains used for agricultural products (as defined in the first section of the Act of July 2, 1926 (44 Stat. 802, chapter 725; 7 U.S.C. 451 )). . 4. Reports on investments by foreign countries in United States agriculture industry Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act and annually thereafter, the Secretary of Agriculture and the Comptroller General of the United States shall each— (1) conduct an analysis of foreign influence in the United States agriculture industry; and (2) submit to Congress a report that includes a summary of— (A) foreign investments in the United States agriculture industry; (B) the potential for foreign investment to undermine United States agriculture production and agricultural supply chains; (C) the largest international threats for increased foreign control of, and investment in, the United States agriculture sector; and (D) agriculture-related espionage and theft techniques used by foreign governments, including any attempts to target United States agricultural intellectual property, innovation, research and development, cost or pricing data, or internal strategy documents.