Philippine Human Rights Act

Bill: 117-hr-3884
Sponsor: full_name: Rep. Wild, Susan [D-PA-7]
Introduced: 2021-06-14
Policy area: International Affairs
Subjects: Accounting and auditing

Asia

Congressional oversight

Criminal investigation, prosecution, interrogation

Foreign aid and international relief

Foreign loans and debt

Government studies and investigations

Human rights

Judicial procedure and administration

Law enforcement administration and funding

Military assistance, sales, and agreements

Multilateral development programs

News media and reporting

Philippines

Protest and dissent

Sovereignty, recognition, national governance and status
Latest action: action_date: 2021-06-14
text: Referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and in addition to the Committee on Financial Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

Summaries:
action_date: 2021-06-14
action_desc: Introduced in House
text: <p><b>Philippine Human Rights Act</b></p> <p>This bill imposes limitations on providing assistance to the police or military of the Philippines. </p> <p>No federal funds may be used to provide such assistance until the Philippines government has taken certain actions, including (1) investigating and successfully prosecuting members of its military and police forces who have violated human rights, (2) withdrawing the military from domestic policing activities, and (3) establishing that it effectively protects the rights of journalists and civil society activists. </p> <p>The President shall also direct U.S. representatives at multilateral development banks to vote against providing loans to the police or military of the Philippines. </p>

tv_txt: I 117th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 3884 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES June 14, 2021 Ms. Wild (for herself, Mr. Lowenthal , Ms. Schakowsky , Mr. Johnson of Georgia , Mr. Rush , Mr. Pocan , Ms. Omar , Ms. Titus , Mr. Blumenauer , Ms. Porter , Ms. Meng , Mr. Gomez , Ms. McCollum , and Mr. McGovern ) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs , and in addition to the Committee on Financial Services , for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned A BILL To suspend the provision of security assistance to the Philippines until the Government of the Philippines has made certain reforms to the military and police forces, and for other purposes.

1. Short title This Act may be cited as the Philippine Human Rights Act . 2. Findings Congress finds the following: (1) The U.S. State Department’s 2020 Human Rights Report on the Philippines states There were numerous reports of government security agencies and their informal allies committed arbitrary or unlawful killings in connection with the government directed campaign against illegal drugs. . The Report goes on to state, Government mechanisms to investigate and punish abuse and corruption in the security forces were poorly resourced and remained largely ineffective . The United Nations Office of the High Commissioner on Human Rights in its annual report for the 44th Session of the Human Rights Council concluded that there is long-standing overemphasis on public order and national security at the expense of human rights has become more acute in recent years, and there are concerns that the vilification of dissent is being increasingly institutionalized and normalized in ways that will be very difficult to reverse; . (2) The United States continues to provide support via security assistance to the administration of Philippines President Duterte, whose brutal Drug War and other campaigns have taken the lives of over 30,000 urban poor, peasants, workers, indigenous and environmental activists as well as human rights defenders, religious leaders, and peace advocates. (3) Government agencies of the Philippines report 4,948 suspected drug users and dealers, including 60 children, died during police operations from July 1, 2016 to September 30, 2018, and according to Human Rights Watch, the Philippine National Police (PNP) have reported 22,983 deaths remain classified as homicides under investigation since the Drug War began. (4) As of December 2020, the Alliance for Advancement of People’s Rights ( Karapatan ) has documented 376 extrajudicial political killings, 488 victims of attempted politically motivated killings, 222 victims of torture, around 3,600 victims of illegal arrests, over 100,000 victims of threats and harassments, and nearly half a million internal refugees under the Duterte administration. (5) Duterte has blatantly targeted and publicly advocated for the killing of faith leaders. Catholic Bishops, priests, pastors, and laity have been threatened, intimidated, harassed and murdered for speaking out against extra-judicial killings and the war on drugs. (6) Duterte has also abused his office by targeting critics and political opponents for intimidation and elimination. Since Duterte took office, over 30 labor leaders have been murdered and 3 have been jailed as political prisoners, over 25 mayors and vice mayors have been assassinated, and Senator Leila De Lima who has been a staunch critic of the drug war killings having been detained for over 4 years. (7) The international NGO Global Witness has declared the Philippines to be the deadliest country in the world for defenders of human rights, the environment, and natural resources, with 30 environmentalists, 54 indigenous people, and 207 farmers and peasants extrajudicially killed since Duterte took office in 2016. Included in the targeting of environmental activists was American citizen, Brandon Lee, who was subjected to an assassination attempt on August 6, 2019. Brandon has been subjected to repeated threats and harassment by the Philippine military due to his advocacy relating to the land and rights of indigenous people in Ifugao province and the surrounding Cordillera region of the Philippines. While Brandon Lee survived the attack, he has been left paralyzed and his assailants have not been brought to justice. (8) It is widely recognized that the Duterte administration silences dissent and the press. The State Department’s 2019 Report states, Government harassment of some media outlets occurred, however, and polls suggested many Filipinos consider it dangerous to publish information critical of the administration. . In May 2020, ABS-CBN, one of the Philippines’ two major sources of news, and an occasional critic of Duterte’s policies, was forced off air due to the denial of a franchise license by the Congress of the Philippines, at the behest of the Duterte administration. Similarly, Maria Ressa, a vocal critic of the Duterte administration, Times Magazine’s Person of the Year 2018 recipient, and founder of the digital news site Rappler was convicted of cyber libel in June 2020. (9) On July 3, 2020 the Anti-Terrorism Act of the Philippines was passed into law. While purporting to counter terrorism, the bill rolls back many civil liberties by lessening requirements for judicial warrants, allows for extended pre-trial detention, and allows for the prosecution of conduct that is considered protected political speech. The Anti-Terrorism Act is viewed by many as a threat to Freedom of Speech in the Philippines and yet another tool the Duterte administration will use to silence critics and political rivals. Representative Jan Schakowsky, along with 49 other members of the U.S. Congress, urged the government of the Philippines to repeal this repressive legislation . (10) The practice of red-tagging , wherein the government labels activists, critics, and non-governmental organizations as terrorists, has been growing in the Philippines from 2020 to 2021. This tactic is used to isolate individuals or groups and, in many cases, mark them for harassment or assassination by Philippines security or paramilitary forces. (11) On March 7, 2021, the Armed Forces of the Philippines (AFP) and Philippines National Police (PNP) carried out a series of joint operations across Calabarzon. The operations led to the murder of nine activists and the arrest of six others. The victims were members of progressive organizations that advocated around issues of labor, land and indigenous rights, environmental protections, and housing rights for the urban poor. The Philippine government claims that it carried out the raids in Calabarzon to execute valid search warrants for weapons and that the killings only resulted from the victims resisting arrest. This claim has been met with extreme skepticism due to the government’s history of fabricating evidence and red-tagging progressive groups and activists. Further suspicion was cast on the allegations of resisting arrest when family members of the victims were prohibited by the PNP and AFP from collecting the victim’s bodies. Following the attacks in Calabarzon, Duterte’s spokesperson endorsed the killings of the activists and security forces began to surveil and harass human rights groups that are investigating the killings. (12) The United States continues to arm state security forces of the Philippines. Despite clear documentation of abuses and international condemnation, in April 2020, the United States announced a pair of arms sales totaling $2,000,000,000 for items including hellfire missiles and attack helicopters. In July 2020, the United States announced an additional sale of $126,000,000 worth of assault boats and armaments. 3. Suspension of security assistance (a) Suspension of security assistance No Federal funds are authorized to be appropriated or otherwise made available to provide assistance for the police or military of the Philippines, including assistance in the form of equipment or training, until the date described in subsection (d). (b) Loans from multilateral development banks The President shall instruct United States representatives at multilateral development banks to vote against providing any loans to the police or military of the Philippines. (c) Report required Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Inspectors General of the Department of State and Department of Defense shall jointly submit to the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate a report that— (1) specifies all forms of security assistance or loans made available to the Philippine National Police or the armed forces of the Philippines, including any organizations or individuals operating with the authority of the Philippine National Police or the armed forces of the Philippines, by the United States or by multilateral development banks during the period beginning January 1, 2016, and ending on the date of the submission of the report; (2) contains all reports generated by recipients of United States security assistance or loans from multilateral development banks to the Philippines with respect to the use, investment, or transfer of such assistance or loans; and (3) details any and all misuses of security assistance and loans during the period beginning January 1, 2016, and ending on the date of the submission of the report by the Philippine National Police, the armed forces of the Philippines, or any affiliated groups or individuals, such as extrajudicial killings, intimidation of political opponents, illegal sales under Philippine or international law, or misappropriation. (d) Conditions for lifting suspension of assistance The suspension of security assistance under subsection (a) shall terminate on the date on which the Secretary of State certifies to the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate that the Government of the Philippines has— (1) investigated and successfully prosecuted members of military and police forces who have violated human rights, ensured that the military and police cooperated in such cases, and affirmed that such violations have ceased; (2) withdrawn the military from involvement in domestic policing activities, in accordance with the Philippine Constitution, and ensured that all domestic police functions are separated from the military chain of command and are instead directly responsible to civilian authorities; (3) established that it effectively protects the rights of trade unionists, journalists, human rights defenders, critics of the government, faith and religious leaders, and other civil society activists to operate without interference; (4) taken effective steps to guarantee a judicial system that is capable of investigating, prosecuting, and bringing to justice members of the police and military who have committed human rights abuses; and (5) fully complied with domestic and United States audits and investigations regarding the improper use of prior security assistance.