Quantum Computing Cybersecurity Preparedness Act

Bill: 117-s-4592
Sponsor: full_name: Sen. Hassan, Margaret Wood [D-NH]
Introduced: 2022-07-21
Policy area: Government Operations and Politics
Subjects: Computer security and identity theft

Computers and information technology

Congressional oversight

Government information and archives

Government studies and investigations

Homeland security

Product development and innovation

Right of privacy
Latest action: action_date: 2022-12-13
text: Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 635.

Summaries:
action_date: 2022-07-21
action_desc: Introduced in Senate
text: <p><strong>Quantum Computing Cybersecurity Preparedness Act</strong></p> <p>This bill addresses the migration of executive agencies information technology systems to post-quantum cryptography. Post-quantum cryptography is encryption strong enough to resist attacks from quantum computers developed in the future.</p> <p>Not later than one year after the National Institutes of Standards and Technology has issued post-quantum cryptography standards, the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) shall begin to prioritize the migration of agency information technology systems to post-quantum cryptography.</p> <p>Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this bill, the OMB shall submit to Congress a report on</p> <ul> <li>a strategy to address the risk posed by the vulnerabilities of agency information technology systems to the potential capability of a quantum computer;</li> <li>the funding necessary to secure such information technology systems from the threat posed by adversarial access to quantum computers; and </li> <li>a description of federal coordination efforts to develop standards for post-quantum cryptography, including any federal Information Processing Standards.</li></ul>

action_date: 2022-12-13
action_desc: Reported to Senate
text: <p><strong>Quantum Computing Cybersecurity Preparedness Act</strong></p> <p>This bill addresses the migration of executive agencies information technology systems to post-quantum cryptography. Post-quantum cryptography is encryption strong enough to resist attacks from quantum computers developed in the future.</p> <p>Not later than one year after the National Institutes of Standards and Technology has issued post-quantum cryptography standards, the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) shall begin to prioritize the migration of agency information technology systems to post-quantum cryptography.</p> <p>Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this bill, the OMB shall submit to Congress a report on</p> <ul> <li>a strategy to address the risk posed by the vulnerabilities of agency information technology systems to the potential capability of a quantum computer;</li> <li>the funding necessary to secure such information technology systems from the threat posed by adversarial access to quantum computers; and </li> <li>a description of federal coordination efforts to develop standards for post-quantum cryptography, including any federal Information Processing Standards.</li></ul>

tv_txt: II 117th CONGRESS 2d Session S. 4592 IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES July 21, 2022 Ms. Hassan (for herself and Mr. Portman ) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs A BILL To encourage the migration of Federal Government information technology systems to quantum-resistant cryptography, and for other purposes.

1. Short title This Act may be cited as the Quantum Computing Cybersecurity Preparedness Act . 2. Findings; sense of Congress (a) Findings Congress finds the following: (1) Cryptography is essential for the national security of the United States and the functioning of the economy of the United States. (2) The most widespread encryption protocols today rely on computational limits of classical computers to provide cybersecurity. (3) Quantum computers might one day have the ability to push computational boundaries, allowing us to solve problems that have been intractable thus far, such as integer factorization, which is important for encryption. (4) The rapid progress of quantum computing suggests the potential for adversaries of the United States to steal sensitive encrypted data today using classical computers, and wait until sufficiently powerful quantum systems are available to decrypt it. (b) Sense of Congress It is the sense of Congress that— (1) a strategy for the migration of information technology systems of the Federal Government to post-quantum cryptography is needed; and (2) the governmentwide and industrywide approach to post-quantum cryptography should prioritize developing applications, hardware intellectual property, and software that can be easily updated to support cryptographic agility. 3. Definitions In this Act: (1) Classical computer The term classical computer means a device that accepts digital data and manipulates the information based on a program or sequence of instructions for how data is to be processed and encodes information in binary bits that can either be 0s or 1s. (2) Director of CISA The term Director of CISA means the Director of the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency. (3) Director of NIST The term Director of NIST means the Director of the National Institute of Standards and Technology. (4) Director of OMB The term Director of OMB means the Director of the Office of Management and Budget. (5) Executive agency The term executive agency has the meaning given the term Executive agency in section 105 of title 5, United States Code. (6) Information technology The term information technology has the meaning given the term in section 3502 of title 44, United States Code. (7) Post-quantum cryptography The term post-quantum cryptography means a cryptographic system that— (A) is secure against decryption attempts using a quantum computer or classical computer; and (B) can interoperate with existing communications protocols and networks. (8) Quantum computer The term quantum computer means a computer that uses the collective properties of quantum states to perform calculations. 4. Inventory of cryptographic systems; migration to post-quantum cryptography (a) Inventory (1) Establishment Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Director of OMB shall establish, by rule or binding guidance, a requirement for each executive agency to establish and maintain an inventory of each cryptographic system in use by the agency. (2) Additional content in rule or binding guidance In the rule or binding guidance established by paragraph (1), the Director of OMB shall include, in addition to the requirement described under that paragraph— (A) a description of information technology to be prioritized for migration to post-quantum cryptography; (B) a description of the information required to be reported pursuant to subsection (b); and (C) a process for evaluating progress on migrating information technology to post-quantum cryptography, which shall be automated to the greatest extent practicable. (3) Periodic updates The Director of OMB shall update the rule or binding guidance established by paragraph (1) as the Director determines necessary. (b) Agency reports Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, and on an ongoing basis thereafter, the head of each executive agency shall provide to the Director of OMB, the Director of CISA, and the National Cyber Director an inventory of all information technology in use by the executive agency that is vulnerable to decryption by quantum computers, prioritized pursuant to the guidance issued under subsection (a)(2). (c) Migration and assessment (1) Migration to post-quantum cryptography Not later than 1 year after the date on which the Director of NIST has issued post-quantum cryptography standards, the Director of OMB shall issue guidance requiring each executive agency to develop a plan to migrate information technology of the agency to post-quantum cryptography. (2) Designation of systems for migration Not later than 90 days after the date on which the guidance required by paragraph (1) has been issued, the Director of OMB shall issue guidance for agencies to— (A) designate information technology to be migrated to post-quantum cryptography; and (B) prioritize information technology designated under subparagraph (A), on the basis of the amount of risk posed by decryption by quantum computers to that technology, for migration to post-quantum cryptography. (d) Interoperability The Director of OMB shall ensure that the designations and prioritizations made under subsection (c)(2) are assessed and coordinated to ensure interoperability. (e) Report on post-Quantum cryptography Not later than 15 months after the date of enactment of this Act, the Director of OMB shall submit to Congress a report on the following: (1) A strategy to address the risk posed by the vulnerabilities of information technology systems of executive agencies to weakened encryption due to the potential and possible capability of a quantum computer to breach that encryption. (2) The amount of funding needed by executive agencies to secure the information technology systems described in paragraph (1) from the risk posed by an adversary of the United States using a quantum computer to breach the encryption of information technology systems. (3) A description of Federal civilian executive branch coordination efforts led by the National Institute of Standards and Technology, including timelines, to develop standards for post-quantum cryptography, including any Federal Information Processing Standards developed under chapter 35 of title 44, United States Code, as well as standards developed through voluntary, consensus standards bodies such as the International Organization for Standardization. (f) Report on migration to post-Quantum cryptography in information technology systems Not later than 1 year after the date on which the Director of OMB issues guidance under subsection (c)(2), and annually thereafter until the date that is 5 years after the date on which post-quantum cryptographic standards are issued, the Director of OMB shall submit to Congress, with the report submitted pursuant to section 3553(c) of title 44, United States Code, a report on the progress of executive agencies in adopting post-quantum cryptography standards. 5. Determination of budgetary effects The budgetary effects of this Act, for the purpose of complying with the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010, shall be determined by reference to the latest statement titled Budgetary Effects of PAYGO Legislation for this Act, submitted for printing in the Congressional Record by the Chairman of the House Budget Committee, provided that such statement has been submitted prior to the vote on passage.

tv_txt: II Calendar No. 635 117th CONGRESS 2d Session S. 4592 [Report No. 117–251] IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES July 21, 2022 Ms. Hassan (for herself, Mr. Portman , Ms. Rosen , Mr. Tillis , Mr. Young , and Mr. Heinrich ) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs December 13, 2022 Reported by Mr. Peters , with an amendment Insert the part printed in italic A BILL To encourage the migration of Federal Government information technology systems to quantum-resistant cryptography, and for other purposes.

1. Short title This Act may be cited as the Quantum Computing Cybersecurity Preparedness Act . 2. Findings; sense of Congress (a) Findings Congress finds the following: (1) Cryptography is essential for the national security of the United States and the functioning of the economy of the United States. (2) The most widespread encryption protocols today rely on computational limits of classical computers to provide cybersecurity. (3) Quantum computers might one day have the ability to push computational boundaries, allowing us to solve problems that have been intractable thus far, such as integer factorization, which is important for encryption. (4) The rapid progress of quantum computing suggests the potential for adversaries of the United States to steal sensitive encrypted data today using classical computers, and wait until sufficiently powerful quantum systems are available to decrypt it. (b) Sense of Congress It is the sense of Congress that— (1) a strategy for the migration of information technology systems of the Federal Government to post-quantum cryptography is needed; and (2) the governmentwide and industrywide approach to post-quantum cryptography should prioritize developing applications, hardware intellectual property, and software that can be easily updated to support cryptographic agility. 3. Definitions In this Act: (1) Classical computer The term classical computer means a device that accepts digital data and manipulates the information based on a program or sequence of instructions for how data is to be processed and encodes information in binary bits that can either be 0s or 1s. (2) Director of CISA The term Director of CISA means the Director of the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency. (3) Director of NIST The term Director of NIST means the Director of the National Institute of Standards and Technology. (4) Director of OMB The term Director of OMB means the Director of the Office of Management and Budget. (5) Executive agency The term executive agency has the meaning given the term Executive agency in section 105 of title 5, United States Code. (6) Information technology The term information technology has the meaning given the term in section 3502 of title 44, United States Code. (7) Post-quantum cryptography The term post-quantum cryptography means a cryptographic system that— (A) is secure against decryption attempts using a quantum computer or classical computer; and (B) can interoperate with existing communications protocols and networks. (8) Quantum computer The term quantum computer means a computer that uses the collective properties of quantum states to perform calculations. 4. Inventory of cryptographic systems; migration to post-quantum cryptography (a) Inventory (1) Establishment Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Director of OMB shall establish, by rule or binding guidance, a requirement for each executive agency to establish and maintain an inventory of each cryptographic system in use by the agency. (2) Additional content in rule or binding guidance In the rule or binding guidance established by paragraph (1), the Director of OMB shall include, in addition to the requirement described under that paragraph— (A) a description of information technology to be prioritized for migration to post-quantum cryptography; (B) a description of the information required to be reported pursuant to subsection (b); and (C) a process for evaluating progress on migrating information technology to post-quantum cryptography, which shall be automated to the greatest extent practicable. (3) Periodic updates The Director of OMB shall update the rule or binding guidance established by paragraph (1) as the Director determines necessary. (b) Agency reports Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, and on an ongoing basis thereafter, the head of each executive agency shall provide to the Director of OMB, the Director of CISA, and the National Cyber Director an inventory of all information technology in use by the executive agency that is vulnerable to decryption by quantum computers, prioritized pursuant to the guidance issued under subsection (a)(2). (c) Migration and assessment (1) Migration to post-quantum cryptography Not later than 1 year after the date on which the Director of NIST has issued post-quantum cryptography standards, the Director of OMB shall issue guidance requiring each executive agency to develop a plan to migrate information technology of the agency to post-quantum cryptography. (2) Designation of systems for migration Not later than 90 days after the date on which the guidance required by paragraph (1) has been issued, the Director of OMB shall issue guidance for executive agencies to— (A) designate information technology to be migrated to post-quantum cryptography; and (B) prioritize information technology designated under subparagraph (A), on the basis of the amount of risk posed by decryption by quantum computers to that technology, for migration to post-quantum cryptography. (d) Interoperability The Director of OMB shall ensure that the designations and prioritizations made under subsection (c)(2) are assessed and coordinated to ensure interoperability. (e) Report on post-Quantum cryptography Not later than 15 months after the date of enactment of this Act, the Director of OMB shall submit to Congress a report on the following: (1) A strategy to address the risk posed by the vulnerabilities of information technology systems of executive agencies to weakened encryption due to the potential and possible capability of a quantum computer to breach that encryption. (2) The amount of funding needed by executive agencies to secure the information technology systems described in paragraph (1) from the risk posed by an adversary of the United States using a quantum computer to breach the encryption of information technology systems. (3) A description of Federal civilian executive branch coordination efforts led by the National Institute of Standards and Technology, including timelines, to develop standards for post-quantum cryptography, including any Federal Information Processing Standards developed under chapter 35 of title 44, United States Code, as well as standards developed through voluntary, consensus standards bodies such as the International Organization for Standardization. (f) Report on migration to post-Quantum cryptography in information technology systems Not later than 1 year after the date on which the Director of OMB issues guidance under subsection (c)(2), and annually thereafter until the date that is 5 years after the date on which post-quantum cryptographic standards are issued, the Director of OMB shall submit to Congress, with the report submitted pursuant to section 3553(c) of title 44, United States Code, a report on the progress of executive agencies in adopting post-quantum cryptography standards. 5. Determination of budgetary effects The budgetary effects of this Act, for the purpose of complying with the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010, shall be determined by reference to the latest statement titled Budgetary Effects of PAYGO Legislation for this Act, submitted for printing in the Congressional Record by the Chairman of the House Budget Committee, provided that such statement has been submitted prior to the vote on passage.

December 13, 2022 Reported with an amendment