Public Lands Leadership Act of 2020

Bill: 116-s-4836
Sponsor: full_name: Sen. Tester, Jon [D-MT]
Introduced: 2020-10-21
Policy area: Government Operations and Politics
Subjects: Congressional oversight

Congressional-executive branch relations

Department of the Interior

Federal officials

Government employee pay, benefits, personnel management

Judicial review and appeals

Land use and conservation

Presidents and presidential powers, Vice Presidents
Latest action: action_date: 2020-10-21
text: Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.

Summaries:
action_date: 2020-10-21
action_desc: Introduced in Senate
text: <p><b>Public Lands Leadership Act of 2020</b></p> <p>This bill prohibits the Department of Justice (DOJ) from taking a certain position in the case of <i>Bullock v. United States Bureau of Land Management</i>. Specifically, DOJ may not argue that an individual exercising the authority of the head of an agency, regardless of the individual's title and the individual serving without congressional consent for over a year, does not violate the Federal Vacancies Reform Act of 1998. (That Act generally sets out the means by which an individual may temporarily serve in an executive agency position that requires the advice and consent of the Senate, including the categories of qualifying individuals and the duration of such service.)</p>

tv_txt: II 116th CONGRESS 2d Session S. 4836 IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES October 21 (legislative day, October 19), 2020 Mr. Tester (for himself, Mr. Van Hollen , Mr. Wyden , Ms. Rosen , and Mr. Merkley ) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary A BILL To prevent efforts of the Department of Justice to advocate courts that an individual exercising the authority of the head of an agency for more than a year, regardless of their title, is not in violation of the Federal Vacancies Reform Act of 1998.

1. Short title This Act may be cited as the Public Lands Leadership Act of 2020 . 2. Findings Congress finds that— (1) William Perry Pendley is not an appropriate choice to lead, work in, or advise any public land management agency due to his record prior to his employment at the Bureau of Land Management, and his continuing work there; (2) Mr. Pendley has a lengthy and public record supporting the transfer and privatization of public land, including the 245,000,000 acres and 700,000,000 subsurface acres he oversaw as de facto Acting Director of the Bureau of Land Management; (3) Mr. Pendley has pursued the development of natural resources on public lands at the expense of Tribal consultation, public comment, and reasonable oversight; (4) Mr. Pendley has professionally advocated for oil and gas leases issued in the Badger-Two Medicine area, despite the leases being issued without consultation with the Blackfeet Nation, and despite the later decision of the Department of Interior to cancel the leases; (5) Mr. Pendley has opposed and litigated public access to streams and rivers in Montana through his professional opposition to the Montana Stream Access Law; (6) Mr. Pendley has expressed public support for armed insurrection against the agency he oversaw as de facto Acting Director of the Bureau of Land Management; (7) Mr. Pendley has publicly opposed bedrock public lands laws that protect the land he oversaw as de facto Acting Director of the Bureau of Land Management; (8) Mr. Pendley has made disparaging racial comments, indicating he does not intend to serve the entire citizenry equitably and without prejudice; (9) Mr. Pendley has openly mocked the cultures and traditions of Tribal nations, demonstrating his inability to serve as a reliable Federal partner for Tribes and to uphold the trust and treaty responsibilities of the Federal Government; (10) Mr. Pendley has reversed course on decades of collaborative efforts by private landowners, ranchers, State and local governments, and other stakeholders to protect rangeland ecosystems and the greater sage grouse; (11) Mr. Pendley has issued problematic Resource Management Plans in Montana and other States that fly in the face of large-scale public opposition to prioritizing energy development over collaborative conservation efforts and other activities; (12) despite his problematic record, Mr. Pendley served in the top leadership role at the Bureau of Land Management for over a year, and continues to be retained in a senior position; (13) Mr. Pendley served as Deputy Director for Policy and Programs exercising the authority of the director of the Bureau of Land Management for 424 days; (14) Mr. Pendley was the de facto Acting Director of the Bureau of Land Management during this period, regardless of his specific title; (15) the extended role of Mr. Pendley at the Bureau of Land Management is a clear violation of sections 3345 through 3349d of title 5, United States Code (commonly known as the Federal Vacancies Reform Act of 1998 ), as determined by the United States District Court for the District of Montana, and undermines the constitutional responsibility of the Senate to review nominations for agency leadership; (16) on September 25, 2020, the United States District Court for the District of Montana ruled that the lengthy tenure of Mr. Pendley as de facto Acting Director was illegal; (17) Mr. Pendley continues to operate in a senior leadership role at the Bureau of Land Management; (18) the Department of Interior continues to employ Mr. Pendley, and has publicly stated its intention to contest the court ruling; and (19) the failure of the President to advance a formal nominee for the position of the Director of the Bureau of Land Management for congressional review and confirmation over the past 3 1/2 years significantly undermines the constitutional responsibility of the Senate to provide advice and consent on all offices of the United States. 3. Prohibiting DOJ efforts to advocate courts to protect the role of William Pendley as de facto Acting Director The Department of Justice may not, in Bullock v. United States Bureau of Land Management, No. 4:20–cv–00062–BMM, 2020 WL 5746836 (D. Mont. Sept. 25, 2020), advocate that an individual exercising the authority of the head of an agency, regardless of their title and serving without congressional consent for over a year, is not in violation of sections 3345 through 3349d of title 5, United States Code (commonly known as the “Federal Vacancies Reform Act of 1998”).