FUTURE of Artificial Intelligence Act of 2020

Bill: 116-hr-7559
Sponsor: full_name: Rep. Olson, Pete [R-TX-22]
Introduced: 2020-07-09
Policy area: Science, Technology, Communications
Subjects: Administrative law and regulatory procedures

Advanced technology and technological innovations

Advisory bodies

Competitiveness, trade promotion, trade deficits

Computer security and identity theft

Computers and information technology

Congressional oversight

Department of Commerce

Employment and training programs

Government studies and investigations

International scientific cooperation

Law enforcement administration and funding

Minority employment

Public-private cooperation

Right of privacy

Rural conditions and development

Science and engineering education

Urban and suburban affairs and development
Latest action: action_date: 2020-07-09
text: Referred to the House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology.

Summaries:
action_date: 2020-07-09
action_desc: Introduced in House
text: <p><b>Fundamentally Understanding the Usability and Realistic Evolution of Artificial Intelligence Act of 2020 or the FUTURE of Artificial Intelligence Act of 2020</b></p> <p>This bill directs the Chief Technology Officer, in the Office of Science and Technology Policy, to establish a Federal Advisory Committee on the Development and Implementation of Artificial Intelligence to advise the President on matters relating to the development of artificial intelligence, including:</p> <ul> <li>U.S. competitiveness, including the promotion of investment into the development of artificial intelligence; </li> <li> the U.S. workforce, including the potential for using artificial intelligence for rapid retraining of workers, due to the possible effect of technological displacement;</li> <li>education, including science, technology, engineering, and mathematics education to prepare workers as the needs of employers change;</li> <li>open sharing of data and research on artificial intelligence; </li> <li>international cooperation and competitiveness, including the competitive international landscape for artificial intelligence-related industries; </li> <li>matters relating to individual civil rights, including how rights are or will be affected by the use of artificial intelligence technology and whether such uses should be subject to additional controls, oversight, or limitations; and </li> <li>matters relating to urbanization and the development of smart cities. </li> </ul>

tv_txt: I 116th CONGRESS 2d Session H. R. 7559 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES July 9, 2020 Mr. Olson (for himself and Mr. McNerney ) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology A BILL To require the Director of the National Science Foundation, in consultation with the Director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy, to establish an advisory committee to advise the President on matters relating to the development of artificial intelligence, and for other purposes.

1. Short title This Act may be cited as the Fundamentally Understanding The Usability and Realistic Evolution of Artificial Intelligence Act of 2020 or the FUTURE of Artificial Intelligence Act of 2020 . 2. Sense of congress It is the sense of Congress that— (1) understanding and preparing for the ongoing development of artificial intelligence is critical to the economic prosperity and social stability of the United States; (2) as artificial intelligence evolves, it can greatly benefit society by powering the information economy, fostering better informed decisions and helping unlock answers to questions that, as of the date of the enactment of this Act, are unanswerable; (3) for the reasons set forth in paragraph (2), it is beneficial to better understand artificial intelligence and foster the development of artificial intelligence in a manner that maximizes its benefit to society; and (4) it is critical that the priorities of the advisory committee established under section 3(a)(1) include developing guidance or recommendations— (A) to promote a climate of investment and innovation to ensure the global competitiveness of the United States; (B) to optimize the development of artificial intelligence to address the potential growth, restructuring, or other changes in the United States workforce that result from the development of artificial intelligence, with particular attention to traditionally underrepresented populations that may be uniquely impacted; (C) to promote and support the unbiased development and application of artificial intelligence; and (D) to protect the privacy rights of individuals. 3. Establishment of Federal advisory committee on the development and implementation of artificial intelligence (a) Establishment (1) In general The Chief Technology Officer shall establish a Federal advisory committee to advise the President on matters relating to the development of artificial intelligence. (2) Designation The Federal advisory committee established under paragraph (1) shall be known as the Federal Advisory Committee on the Development and Implementation of Artificial Intelligence (in this section referred to as the Advisory Committee ). (b) Purposes of the advisory committee (1) Advice The Advisory Committee shall provide advice to the Chief Technology Officer on matters relating to the development and use of artificial general intelligence and narrow artificial intelligence, including on the following as they relate to artificial intelligence: (A) The competitiveness of the United States, including matters relating to the promotion of public and private sector investment and innovation into the development of artificial intelligence. (B) Workforce, including matters relating to the potential for using artificial intelligence for rapid retraining of workers, due to the possible effect of technological displacement and to increase the labor force participation of traditionally underrepresented populations, including minorities, low-income populations, and persons with disabilities. (C) Education, including matters relating to science, technology, engineering, and mathematics education to prepare the United States workforce as the needs of employers change. (D) Ethics training and development for individuals, including both private and government technologists, working on and using artificial intelligence. (E) Matters relating to open sharing of data and the open sharing of research on artificial intelligence. (F) International cooperation and competitiveness, including matters relating to the competitive international landscape for artificial intelligence-related industries. (G) Accountability and legal rights, including matters relating to the responsibility for any violations of laws by an artificial intelligence system and the compatibility of international regulations. (H) Matters relating to machine learning bias through core cultural and societal norms. (I) Matters relating to how artificial intelligence can serve or enhance opportunities in rural communities. (J) Government efficiency, including matters relating to how to promote cost saving and streamline operations. (K) Matters relating to individual civil rights, including an assessment regarding how rights are or will be affected by the use of artificial intelligence technology and whether such uses should be subject to additional controls, oversight, or limitations. (L) Matters relating to urbanization and the development of smart cities. (2) Study The Advisory Committee shall study and assess the following: (A) How the term artificial intelligence should be defined for purposes of this section and how the relevant scope of the Advisory Committee should be defined, including how such definitions relate to artificial systems and both narrow and general forms of artificial intelligence. In carrying out this subparagraph, the Advisory Committee shall consider the following: (1) The term artificial intelligence includes the following: (A) Any artificial systems that perform tasks under varying and unpredictable circumstances, without significant human oversight, or that can learn from their experience and improve their performance. Such systems may be developed in computer software, physical hardware, or other contexts not yet contemplated. They may solve tasks requiring human-like perception, cognition, planning, learning, communication, or physical action. In general, the more human-like the system within the context of its tasks, the more it can be said to use artificial intelligence. (B) Systems that think like humans, such as cognitive architectures and neural networks. (C) Systems that act like humans, such as systems that can pass the Turing test or other comparable test via natural language processing, knowledge representation, automated reasoning, and learning. (D) A set of techniques, including machine learning, that seek to approximate some cognitive task. (E) Systems that act rationally, such as intelligent software agents and embodied robots that achieve goals via perception, planning, reasoning, learning, communicating, decision making, and acting. (2) The term artificial general intelligence means a notional future artificial intelligence system that exhibits apparently intelligent behavior at least as advanced as a person across the range of cognitive, emotional, and social behaviors. (3) The term narrow artificial intelligence means an artificial intelligence system that addresses specific application areas such as playing strategic games, language translation, self-driving vehicles, and facial or other image recognition. . (B) How to create a climate for public and private sector investment and innovation in artificial intelligence. (C) The possible benefits and effects that the development of artificial intelligence may have on the economy, workforce, and competitiveness of the United States. (D) Whether and how networked, automated, artificial intelligence applications and robotic devices will displace or create jobs and how any job-related gains relating to artificial intelligence can be maximized. (E) How bias can be identified and eliminated in the development of artificial intelligence and in the algorithms that support them, including with respect to the following: (i) The selection and processing of data used to train artificial intelligence. (ii) Diversity in the development of artificial intelligence. (iii) The ways and places the systems are deployed and the potential harmful outcomes. (F) Whether and how to incorporate ethical standards in the development and implementation of artificial intelligence. (G) How the Federal Government can encourage technological progress in implementation of artificial intelligence that benefits the full spectrum of social and economic classes. (H) How the privacy rights of individuals are or will be affected by technological innovation relating to artificial intelligence. (I) Whether technological advancements in artificial intelligence have or will outpace the legal and regulatory regimes implemented to protect consumers. (J) How existing laws, including those concerning data access and privacy, should be modernized to enable the potential of artificial intelligence. (K) How the Federal Government utilizes artificial intelligence to handle large or complex data sets. (L) How ongoing dialogues and consultations with multi-stakeholder groups can maximize the potential of artificial intelligence and further development of artificial intelligence technologies that can benefit everyone inclusively. (M) How the development of artificial intelligence can affect cost savings and streamline operations in various areas of government operations, including health care, cybersecurity, infrastructure, and disaster recovery. (N) Such other matters as the Advisory Committee considers appropriate. (3) Reports and recommendations (A) Report by advisory committee Not later than 540 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Advisory Committee shall submit to the Chief Technology Officer and to Congress a report on the findings of the Advisory Committee and such recommendations as the Advisory Committee may have for administrative or legislative action relating to artificial intelligence. (B) Recommendations of Chief Technology Officer Not later than 90 days after receiving the report submitted under subparagraph (A), the Chief Technology Officer shall review the report and submit to Congress such recommendations as the Chief Technology Officer may have with respect to the matters contained in the report submitted under subparagraph (A). (c) Membership (1) Voting members (A) In general The Advisory Committee shall be composed of 19 voting members who shall be appointed by the Chief Technology Officer, with advisement from the Chair and Ranking Member of the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate and the Chair and Ranking Member of the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology of the House of Representatives, for purposes of the Advisory Committee from among individuals with expertise in matters relating to workforce development, ethics, privacy, artificial intelligence, or computer science. (B) Representation In carrying out subparagraph (A), the Chief Technology Officer shall ensure that voting members are appointed as follows: (i) Five members from the academic or research community. (ii) Six members from private industry, at least 1 of whom shall be from a small business concern. (iii) Six members from civil society, at least 2 of whom shall be from groups that advocate for civil liberties or civil rights. (iv) Two members from labor organizations or groups, including those that represent the unique interests of traditionally underrepresented populations. (C) Geographical diversity In carrying out subparagraph (A), the Chief Technology Officer shall ensure that the voting members of the Advisory Committee come from diverse geographical locations within the United States. (2) Nonvoting members The Advisory Committee shall also be composed of such nonvoting members as the Chief Technology Officer considers appropriate, except that the Chief Technology Officer shall appoint at least 1 such member from each of the following: (A) The Department of Education. (B) The Department of Justice. (C) The Department of Labor. (D) The Department of Transportation. (E) The Department of Homeland Security. (F) The Federal Trade Commission. (G) The National Institute of Standards and Technology. (H) The National Science Foundation. (I) The National Science and Technology Council. (J) The National Science and Technology Council Committee on Artificial Intelligence. (K) The intelligence community (as defined in section 3 of the National Security Act of 1947 ( 50 U.S.C. 3003 )). (L) The Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board. (M) Such other nonvoting members as the voting members of the Advisory Committee consider appropriate. (3) Chairperson The Chief Technology Officer shall appoint a chairperson for the Advisory Committee from among the members appointed under paragraph (1). (d) Meetings The Advisory Committee shall meet— (1) in person no less frequently than twice each year; and (2) via telepresence no less frequently than once every 2 months. (e) Subcommittee on artificial intelligence and law enforcement and security (1) Establishment The chairperson of the Advisory Committee shall establish a subcommittee on matters relating to the development of artificial intelligence relating to law enforcement and security matters. (2) Advice The subcommittee shall provide advice to the Secretary on matters relating to the development of artificial intelligence relating to law enforcement and security matters, including advice on the following: (A) Bias, including whether the use of facial recognition by government authorities, including law enforcement agencies, is taking into account ethical considerations and addressing whether such use should be subject to additional oversight, controls, and limitations. (B) Security of data, including law enforcement’s access to data and the security parameters for that data. (C) Adoptability, including methods to allow the United States Government and industry to take advantage of artificial intelligence technologies such as facial recognition technology while at the same time ensuring the potential abuse of such technologies is sufficiently mitigated. (D) Legal standards, including whether technological advancements in artificial intelligence have or will outpace the legal and regulatory regimes implemented to protect consumers, including the tools, training, and resources that could be used by government, including law enforcement agencies, to adapt to the use of artificial intelligence technologies including facial recognition consistent with the privacy rights and civil liberties issues raised by the use of these technologies. (3) Membership The subcommittee shall be composed of 9 members selected by the chairperson as follows: (A) Three members from the law enforcement community. (B) Two members from groups that advocate for civil liberties or civil rights. (C) Two members from private industry. (D) Two members from the private security community. (f) Powers In order to carry out its duties under subsection (b), the Advisory Committee may— (1) hold such hearings, sit and act at such times and places, take such testimony, and receive such evidence as the Advisory Committee considers appropriate; (2) submit to Congress such recommendations as the Advisory Committee considers appropriate; (3) submit to Federal agencies such recommendations as the Advisory Committee considers appropriate; (4) issue reports, guidelines, and memoranda; (5) hold or host conferences and symposia; (6) enter into cooperative agreements with third-party experts to obtain relevant advice or expertise, and oversee staff; (7) establish subcommittees; and (8) establish rules of procedure. (g) Travel expenses The members of the Advisory Committee shall be allowed travel expenses, including per diem in lieu of subsistence, at rates authorized for employees of agencies under subchapter I of chapter 57 of title 5, United States Code, while away from their homes or regular places of business in the performance of services for the Advisory Committee. (h) Funding (1) In general Except as provided in paragraph (2), amounts to carry out this section shall be derived from amounts appropriated or otherwise made available to the National Science Foundation. (2) Donations (A) Authorization The Advisory Committee may solicit and accept donations from private persons and non-Federal entities to carry out this section. (B) Limitation Of the amounts expended by the Advisory Committee in a fiscal year to carry out this section, not more than half may be derived from amounts received under subparagraph (A).