Cable Transparency Act

Bill: 116-hr-7369
Sponsor: full_name: Rep. Mullin, Markwayne [R-OK-2]
Introduced: 2020-06-25
Policy area: Science, Technology, Communications
Subjects: Broadcasting, cable, digital technologies

Government information and archives

State and local government operations

Television and film
Latest action: action_date: 2020-06-25
text: Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.

Summaries:
action_date: 2020-06-25
action_desc: Introduced in House
text: <p><b>Cable Transparency Act</b></p> <p>This bill modifies the term and termination of cable franchises.</p> <p>Specifically, the bill provides that a cable franchise shall continue without any requirement for an operator to renew such franchise until the date the franchise is revoked or terminated. Under current law, a cable operator must submit a proposal for renewal of the franchise to the franchising authority.</p> <p>The bill prohibits generally (1) a franchising authority from revoking a franchise, (2) a cable operator from terminating a franchise, or (3) the revocation or termination of a franchise by operation of law. However, a cable operator may terminate a franchise by submitting a written request to the franchising authority for the revocation of such franchise, and a franchise authority may revoke a franchise if it finds that the cable operator has knowingly and willfully failed to meet a material requirement of the franchise.</p> <p>Further, during a franchise period, a cable operator may obtain the elimination or modification of a franchise requirement by submitting a request for such elimination or modification to the franchise authority.</p>

tv_txt: I 116th CONGRESS 2d Session H. R. 7369 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES June 25, 2020 Mr. Mullin introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce A BILL To amend the Communications Act of 1934 to amend provisions relating to franchise term and termination and provisions relating to the elimination or modification of requirements in franchises, and for other purposes.

1. Short title This Act may be cited as the Cable Transparency Act . 2. Cable franchise term and termination (a) In general Section 626 of the Communications Act of 1934 ( 47 U.S.C. 546 ) is amended to read as follows: 626. Franchise term and termination (a) Franchise term A franchise shall continue in effect (without any requirement for renewal) until the date on which the franchise is revoked or terminated in accordance with subsection (b). (b) Limits (1) Prohibition against revocation; termination Except as provided in paragraph (2), a franchise may not be— (A) revoked by a franchising authority; (B) terminated by a cable operator; or (C) revoked or terminated by operation of law, including by a term in a franchise that revokes or terminates such franchise on a specific date, after a period of time, or upon the occurrence of an event. (2) When termination or revocation of franchise permitted (A) Termination by cable operator (i) In general A cable operator may terminate a franchise by submitting to the franchising authority a written request for the franchising authority to revoke such franchise. (ii) Time of revocation If the cable operator submits a complete request under clause (i), the franchising authority shall revoke the franchise on the date that is 90 days after the franchising authority receives such request. (iii) Deemed to be revoked If a franchising authority does not approve a request by the date required under clause (ii), the franchise is deemed revoked on the day after such date. (B) Termination by franchising authority A franchising authority may revoke a franchise if the franchising authority— (i) finds that the cable operator has knowingly and willfully failed to substantially meet a material requirement imposed by the franchise; (ii) provides the cable operator a reasonable opportunity to cure such failure, after which the cable operator fails to cure such failure; and (iii) does not waive the material requirement or acquiesce with the failure to substantially meet such requirement. (3) When request considered complete; received (A) In general For the purposes of this subsection, a request shall be considered— (i) complete if— (I) the cable operator makes the request by submitting to the franchising authority the form required to be used for making the request; (II) the form submitted contains all of the information specified by the form as being required to be included in form; and (III) the cable operator has not received a written notice from the franchising authority within 10 business days after the date on which the request is received by the franchising authority— (aa) stating that the form does not contain all of the information required to be included in the form; and (bb) identifying the information required to be included in the form that was not included; and (ii) received by franchising authority— (I) in the case of a request submitted electronically, on the date on which the form required to be used for making the request is transmitted; (II) in the case of a request submitted in person, on the date on which the form required to be used for making the request is delivered to the individual or at the location specified in the form for in-person submission; or (III) in the case of a request submitted in any other manner, on the date determined by the franchising authority for the manner in which the request is made. (B) Treatment of multiple forms If a franchising authority requires the use of multiple forms for making a request under this subsection, such forms shall be treated as a single form for purposes of subparagraph (A). (c) Review by Commission (1) Petition A cable operator may petition the Commission for review of a determination by a franchising authority to revoke a franchise under subsection (b)(2)(B). (2) Review The Commission shall review the determination de novo. (3) Order If, based on the evidence presented during the review, the Commission determines that the franchising authority has not demonstrated by a preponderance of the evidence that the franchising authority revoked the franchise in accordance with subsection (b)(2)(B), the Commission shall order the franchising authority to reinstate the franchise. . (b) Elimination or modification of requirement in franchise Section 625 of the Communications Act of 1934 ( 47 U.S.C. 545 ) is amended to read as follows: 625. Elimination or modification of requirement in franchise (a) In general During the period in which a franchise is in effect, the cable operator may obtain the elimination or modification of any requirement in the franchise by submitting to the franchising authority a request for the elimination or modification of such requirement. (b) Elimination or modification of requirement in franchise The franchising authority shall eliminate or modify a requirement in accordance with a complete request submitted under subsection (a) not later than 120 days after receiving such request if the cable operator demonstrates in the request— (1) good cause for the elimination or modification of the requirement; and (2) that the mix, quality, and level of services required by the franchise at the time the franchise was granted will be maintained after the elimination or modification of the requirement. (c) Deemed elimination or modification Except in the case of a request for the elimination or modification of a requirement for services relating to public, educational, or governmental access, if the franchising authority fails to approve or deny the complete request submitted under subsection (a) by the date described under subsection (b), the requirement shall be deemed eliminated or modified in accordance with the request on the day after such date. (d) Appeal (1) In general Any cable operator whose request for elimination or modification of a requirement in a franchise under subsection (a) has been denied by a final decision of a franchising authority may obtain the elimination or modification of such franchise requirements pursuant to the provisions of section 635. (2) Grant of request In the case of any proposed elimination or modification of a requirement in a franchise under subsection (a), the court shall grant such elimination or modification only if the cable operator demonstrates to the court— (A) good cause for the elimination or modification of the requirement; and (B) that the mix, quality, and level of services required by the franchise at the time the franchise was granted will be maintained after the elimination or modification of the requirement. (e) When request considered complete; received (1) In general For the purposes of this section, a request shall be considered— (A) complete if— (i) the cable operator makes the request by submitting to the franchising authority the form required to be used for making the request; (ii) the form submitted contains all of the information specified by the form as being required to be included in form; and (iii) the cable operator has not received a written notice from the franchising authority within 10 business days after the date on which the request is received by the franchising authority— (I) stating that the form does not contain all of the information required to be included in the form; and (II) identifying the information required to be included in the form that was not included; and (B) received by franchising authority— (i) in the case of a request submitted electronically, on the date on which the form required to be used for making the request is transmitted; (ii) in the case of a request submitted in person, on the date on which the form required to be used for making the request is delivered to the individual or at the location specified in the form for in-person submission; or (iii) in the case of a request submitted in any other manner, on the date determined by the franchising authority for the manner in which the request is made. (2) Treatment of multiple forms If a franchising authority requires the use of multiple forms for making a request under this section, such forms shall be treated as a single form for purposes of paragraph (1). . (c) Technical and conforming amendments The Communications Act of 1934 ( 47 U.S.C. 151 et seq.) is amended— (1) in section 601— (A) in paragraph (4), by striking the semicolon at the end and inserting ; and ; (B) by striking paragraph (5); and (C) by redesignating paragraph (6) as paragraph (5); (2) in section 602(9)— (A) by striking initial ; and (B) by striking , or renewal thereof (including a renewal of an authorization which has been granted subject to section 626), ; (3) in section 611(b), by striking and may require as part of a cable operator’s proposal for a franchise renewal, subject to section 626 ; (4) in section 612(b)(3)— (A) by striking or as part of a proposal for renewal, subject to section 626, ; and (B) by striking , or proposal for renewal thereof, ; (5) in section 621(b)(3)— (A) in subparagraph (C)(ii), by striking or franchise renewal ; and (B) in subparagraph (D)— (i) by striking initial ; and (ii) by striking , a franchise renewal, ; (6) in section 624— (A) in subsection (b)(1), by striking (including requests for renewal proposals, subject to section 626) ; and (B) in subsection (d)(1), by striking or renewal thereof ; (7) in section 627— (A) by striking subsection (a); (B) in subsection (b), by inserting , as described in section 626(b)(2)(B), after for cause ; and (C) by striking (b) If and inserting If ; and (8) in section 635A(a), by striking renewal, . (d) Effective date; application (1) Effective date This section, and the amendments made by this section, shall take effect 6 months after the date of the enactment of this Act. (2) Application This section, and the amendments made by this section, shall apply to a franchise granted— (A) on or after the effective date established by paragraph (1); or (B) before such date, if such franchise (including, notwithstanding the amendment made by subsection (c)(2)(B), any renewal thereof) is in effect on such date.