Strengthening the Opposition to Female Genital Mutilation Act of 2020

Bill: 116-hr-6100
Sponsor: full_name: Rep. Jackson Lee, Sheila [D-TX-18]
Introduced: 2020-03-05
Policy area: Crime and Law Enforcement
Subjects: Congressional oversight

Crimes against children

Crimes against women

Criminal procedure and sentencing

Judicial procedure and administration

Sex offenses

Women's health
Latest action: action_date: 2021-01-05
text: Became Public Law No: 116-309.

Summaries:
action_date: 2020-03-05
action_desc: Introduced in House
text: <p><strong>Strengthening the Opposition to Female Genital Mutilation Act of 2020 or the STOP FGM Act of 2020</strong></p> <p> This bill revises the federal criminal statute that prohibits certain conduct often referred to as female genital mutilation (FGM).</p> <p>Currently, the FGM statute prohibits performing certain procedures&#8212;circumcising, excising, or infibulating the female genitalia of a minor&#8212;for nonmedical purposes. However, it does not define FGM.</p> <p>In 2018 a federal district court invalidated the FGM statute in <em>United States vs. Nagarwala</em>. The court found, among other things, that the statute exceeds Congress's authority under the Commerce Clause of the Constitution because it (1) lacks detailed, record-based findings regarding how FGM substantially affects interstate commerce; and (2) lacks jurisdictional elements (e.g., requirements that charged offenses have an explicit connection with, or effect on, interstate commerce). In 2019, the Department of Justice (DOJ) decided not to appeal the decision. </p> <p>This bill creates a statutory definition of <em>female genital mutilation </em>and provides explicit findings regarding the effects of FGM on interstate commerce. </p> <p>The bill broadens the scope of prohibited FGM-related conduct on a minor to include</p> <ul> <li>attempting or conspiring to perform FGM;</li> <li>facilitating or consenting to FGM, as a parent, guardian, or caretaker; and</li> <li>transporting a minor for FGM.</li> </ul> <p>It expressly requires prohibited FGM-related conduct to have a connection to interstate or foreign commerce. </p> <p>The bill increases from 5 to 10 years the statutory maximum prison term for an FGM offense. It also prohibits a federal criminal defendant from asserting, as a defense, that FGM is required as a matter of religion, custom, tradition, ritual, or standard practice.</p> <p>DOJ, in consultation with various federal agencies, must report annually on FGM, including the estimated number of women and girls at risk of or subjected to FGM and actions taken by government agencies to combat the practice.</p> <p>Finally, the bill expresses the sense of Congress that the court erred in invalidating the existing statute. It expresses, among other sentiments, that Congress elects to amend the statute to clarify the commercial nature of FGM, but that Congress does not ratify the interpretation of the federal district court in <em>Nagarwala</em>. </p>

action_date: 2020-09-16
action_desc: Reported to House
text: <p><strong>Strengthening the Opposition to Female Genital Mutilation Act of 2020 or the STOP FGM Act of 2020</strong></p> <p>This bill revises the federal criminal statute that prohibits certain conduct often referred to as female genital mutilation (FGM).</p> <p>Currently, the FGM statute prohibits performing certain procedures&#8212;circumcising, excising, or infibulating the female genitalia of a minor&#8212;for nonmedical purposes. However, it does not define FGM.</p> <p>In 2018 a federal district court invalidated the FGM statute in<em> United States vs. Nagarwala</em>. The court found, among other things, that the statute exceeds Congress's authority under the Commerce Clause of the Constitution because it (1) lacks detailed, record-based findings regarding how FGM substantially affects interstate commerce; and (2) lacks jurisdictional elements (e.g., requirements that charged offenses have an explicit connection with, or effect on, interstate commerce). In 2019, the Department of Justice (DOJ) decided not to appeal the decision.</p> <p>This bill creates a statutory definition of <em>female genital mutilation</em> and provides explicit findings regarding the effects of FGM on interstate commerce.</p> <p>The bill broadens the scope of prohibited FGM-related conduct on a minor to include</p> <ul> <li>attempting or conspiring to perform FGM;</li> <li>facilitating or consenting to FGM, as a parent, guardian, or caretaker; and</li> <li>transporting a minor for FGM.</li> </ul> <p>It expressly requires prohibited FGM-related conduct to have a connection to interstate or foreign commerce.</p> <p>The bill increases from 5 to 10 years the statutory maximum prison term for an FGM offense. It also prohibits a federal criminal defendant from asserting, as a defense, that FGM is required as a matter of religion, custom, tradition, ritual, or standard practice.</p> <p>DOJ, in consultation with various federal agencies, must report annually on FGM, including the estimated number of women and girls at risk of or subjected to FGM and actions taken by government agencies to combat the practice.</p> <p>Finally, the bill expresses the sense of Congress that the court erred in invalidating the existing statute. It expresses, among other sentiments, that Congress elects to amend the statute to clarify the commercial nature of FGM, but that Congress does not ratify the interpretation of the federal district court in <em>Nagarwala</em>.</p>

action_date: 2020-09-21
action_desc: Passed House
text: <p><strong>Strengthening the Opposition to Female Genital Mutilation Act of 2020 or the STOP FGM Act of 2020</strong></p> <p> This bill revises the federal criminal statute that prohibits certain conduct often referred to as female genital mutilation (FGM).</p> <p>Currently, the FGM statute prohibits performing certain procedures&#8212;circumcising, excising, or infibulating the female genitalia of a minor&#8212;for nonmedical purposes. However, it does not define FGM.</p> <p>In 2018 a federal district court invalidated the FGM statute in <em>United States vs. Nagarwala</em>. The court found, among other things, that the statute exceeds Congress's authority under the Commerce Clause of the Constitution because it (1) lacks detailed, record-based findings regarding how FGM substantially affects interstate commerce; and (2) lacks jurisdictional elements (e.g., requirements that charged offenses have an explicit connection with, or effect on, interstate commerce). In 2019, the Department of Justice (DOJ) decided not to appeal the decision.</p> <p>This bill creates a statutory definition of <em>female genital mutilation </em>and provides explicit findings regarding the effects of FGM on interstate commerce. </p> <p>The bill broadens the scope of prohibited FGM-related conduct on a minor to include</p> <ul> <li>attempting or conspiring to perform FGM;</li> <li>facilitating or consenting to FGM, as a parent, guardian, or caretaker; and</li> <li>transporting a minor for FGM.</li> </ul> <p>It expressly requires prohibited FGM-related conduct to have a connection to interstate or foreign commerce. </p> <p>The bill increases from 5 to 10 years the statutory maximum prison term for an FGM offense. It also prohibits a federal criminal defendant from asserting, as a defense, that FGM is required as a matter of religion, custom, tradition, ritual, or standard practice.</p> <p>DOJ, in consultation with various federal agencies, must report annually on FGM, including the estimated number of women and girls at risk of or subjected to FGM and actions taken by government agencies to combat the practice.</p> <p>Finally, the bill expresses the sense of Congress that the court erred in invalidating the existing statute. It expresses, among other sentiments, that Congress elects to amend the statute to clarify the commercial nature of FGM, but that Congress does not ratify the interpretation of the federal district court in <em>Nagarwala</em>.</p>

action_date: 2020-12-15
action_desc: Passed Senate
text: <p><strong>Strengthening the Opposition to Female Genital Mutilation Act of 2020 or the STOP FGM Act of 2020</strong></p> <p> This bill revises the federal criminal statute that prohibits certain conduct often referred to as female genital mutilation (FGM).</p> <p>Currently, the FGM statute prohibits performing certain procedures&#8212;circumcising, excising, or infibulating the female genitalia of a minor&#8212;for nonmedical purposes. However, it does not define FGM.</p> <p>In 2018 a federal district court invalidated the FGM statute in <em>United States vs. Nagarwala</em>. The court found, among other things, that the statute exceeds Congress's authority under the Commerce Clause of the Constitution because it (1) lacks detailed, record-based findings regarding how FGM substantially affects interstate commerce; and (2) lacks jurisdictional elements (e.g., requirements that charged offenses have an explicit connection with, or effect on, interstate commerce). In 2019, the Department of Justice (DOJ) decided not to appeal the decision.</p> <p>This bill creates a statutory definition of <em>female genital mutilation </em>and provides explicit findings regarding the effects of FGM on interstate commerce. </p> <p>The bill broadens the scope of prohibited FGM-related conduct on a minor to include</p> <ul> <li>attempting or conspiring to perform FGM;</li> <li>facilitating or consenting to FGM, as a parent, guardian, or caretaker; and</li> <li>transporting a minor for FGM.</li> </ul> <p>It expressly requires prohibited FGM-related conduct to have a connection to interstate or foreign commerce. </p> <p>The bill increases from 5 to 10 years the statutory maximum prison term for an FGM offense. It also prohibits a federal criminal defendant from asserting, as a defense, that FGM is required as a matter of religion, custom, tradition, ritual, or standard practice.</p> <p>DOJ, in consultation with various federal agencies, must report annually on FGM, including the estimated number of women and girls at risk of or subjected to FGM and actions taken by government agencies to combat the practice.</p> <p>Finally, the bill expresses the sense of Congress that the court erred in invalidating the existing statute. It expresses, among other sentiments, that Congress elects to amend the statute to clarify the commercial nature of FGM, but that Congress does not ratify the interpretation of the federal district court in <em>Nagarwala</em>.</p>

action_date: 2021-01-05
action_desc: Public Law
text: <p><strong>Strengthening the Opposition to Female Genital Mutilation Act of 2020 or the STOP FGM Act of 2020</strong></p> <p> This bill revises the federal criminal statute that prohibits certain conduct often referred to as female genital mutilation (FGM).</p> <p>Currently, the FGM statute prohibits performing certain procedures&#8212;circumcising, excising, or infibulating the female genitalia of a minor&#8212;for nonmedical purposes. However, it does not define FGM.</p> <p>In 2018 a federal district court invalidated the FGM statute in <em>United States vs. Nagarwala</em>. The court found, among other things, that the statute exceeds Congress's authority under the Commerce Clause of the Constitution because it (1) lacks detailed, record-based findings regarding how FGM substantially affects interstate commerce; and (2) lacks jurisdictional elements (e.g., requirements that charged offenses have an explicit connection with, or effect on, interstate commerce). In 2019, the Department of Justice (DOJ) decided not to appeal the decision.</p> <p>This bill creates a statutory definition of <em>female genital mutilation </em>and provides explicit findings regarding the effects of FGM on interstate commerce. </p> <p>The bill broadens the scope of prohibited FGM-related conduct on a minor to include</p> <ul> <li>attempting or conspiring to perform FGM;</li> <li>facilitating or consenting to FGM, as a parent, guardian, or caretaker; and</li> <li>transporting a minor for FGM.</li> </ul> <p>It expressly requires prohibited FGM-related conduct to have a connection to interstate or foreign commerce. </p> <p>The bill increases from 5 to 10 years the statutory maximum prison term for an FGM offense. It also prohibits a federal criminal defendant from asserting, as a defense, that FGM is required as a matter of religion, custom, tradition, ritual, or standard practice.</p> <p>DOJ, in consultation with various federal agencies, must report annually on FGM, including the estimated number of women and girls at risk of or subjected to FGM and actions taken by government agencies to combat the practice.</p> <p>Finally, the bill expresses the sense of Congress that the court erred in invalidating the existing statute. It expresses, among other sentiments, that Congress elects to amend the statute to clarify the commercial nature of FGM, but that Congress does not ratify the interpretation of the federal district court in <em>Nagarwala</em>.</p>

tv_txt: I 116th CONGRESS 2d Session H. R. 6100 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES March 5, 2020 Ms. Jackson Lee (for herself and Mr. Bacon ) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary A BILL To amend title 18, United States Code, to clarify the criminalization of female genital mutilation, and for other purposes.

1. Short title This Act may be cited as the Strengthening the Opposition to Female Genital Mutilation Act of 2020 or the STOP FGM Act of 2020 . 2. Congressional findings and purpose The Congress finds the following: (1) Female genital mutilation is recognized internationally as a human rights violation and a form of child abuse, gender discrimination, and violence against women and girls. Female genital mutilation is a global problem whose eradication requires international cooperation and enforcement at the national level. The United States should demonstrate its commitment to the rights of women and girls by leading the way in the international community in banning this abhorrent practice. (2) Congress has previously prohibited the commission of female genital mutilation on minors. Female genital mutilation is a heinous practice that often inflicts excruciating pain on its victims and causes them to suffer grave physical and psychological harm. (3) Congress has the power under article I, section 8 of the Constitution to make all laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into execution treaties entered into by the United States. (4) Congress also has the power under the Commerce Clause to prohibit female genital mutilation. An international market for the practice exists, and persons who perform female genital mutilation in other countries typically earn a living from doing so. (5) Those who perform this conduct often rely on a connection to interstate or foreign commerce, such as interstate or foreign travel, the transmission or receipt of communications in interstate or foreign commerce, the use of instruments traded in interstate or foreign commerce, or payments of any kind in furtherance of this conduct. (6) Amending the statute to specify a link to interstate or foreign commerce would confirm that Congress has the affirmative power to prohibit this conduct. 3. Amendments to current law on female genital mutilation Section 116 of title 18, United States Code, is amended— (1) by amending subsection (a) to read as follows: (a) Except as provided in subsection (b), whoever, in any circumstance described in subsection (d), knowingly— (1) performs, attempts to perform, or conspires to perform female genital mutilation on another person who has not attained the age of 18 years; (2) being the parent, guardian, or caretaker of a person who has not attained the age of 18 years facilitates or consents to the female genital mutilation of such person; or (3) transports a person who has not attained the age of 18 years for the purpose of the performance of female genital mutilation on such person, shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 10 years, or both. ; (2) by amending subsection (c) to read as follows: (c) It shall not be a defense to a prosecution under this section that female genital mutilation is required as a matter of religion, custom, tradition, ritual, or standard practice. ; (3) by striking subsection (d); and (4) by adding at the end the following: (d) For the purposes of subsection (a), the circumstances described in this subsection are that— (1) the defendant or victim traveled in interstate or foreign commerce, or traveled using a means, channel, facility, or instrumentality of interstate or foreign commerce, in furtherance of or in connection with the conduct described in subsection (a); (2) the defendant used a means, channel, facility, or instrumentality of interstate or foreign commerce in furtherance of or in connection with the conduct described in subsection (a); (3) any payment of any kind was made, directly or indirectly, in furtherance of or in connection with the conduct described in subsection (a) using any means, channel, facility, or instrumentality of interstate or foreign commerce or in or affecting interstate or foreign commerce; (4) the defendant transmitted in interstate or foreign commerce any communication relating to or in furtherance of the conduct described in subsection (a) using any means, channel, facility, or instrumentality of interstate or foreign commerce or in or affecting interstate or foreign commerce by any means or in manner, including by computer, mail, wire, or electromagnetic transmission; (5) any instrument, item, substance, or other object that has traveled in interstate or foreign commerce was used to perform the conduct described in subsection (a); (6) the conduct described in subsection (a) occurred within the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States, or any territory or possession of the United States; or (7) the conduct described in subsection (a) otherwise occurred in or affected interstate or foreign commerce. (e) For purposes of this section, the term female genital mutilation means any procedure performed for non-medical reasons that involves partial or total removal of, or other injury to, the external female genitalia, and includes— (1) a clitoridectomy or the partial or total removal of the clitoris or the prepuce or clitoral hood; (2) excision or the partial or total removal (with or without excision of the clitoris) of the labia minora or the labia majora, or both; (3) infibulation or the narrowing of the vaginal opening (with or without excision of the clitoris); or (4) other procedures that are harmful to the external female genitalia, including pricking, incising, scraping, or cauterizing the genital area. . 4. Report Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, and annually thereafter, the Attorney General, in consultation with the Secretary of Homeland Security, the Secretary of State, the Secretary of Health and Human Services, and the Secretary of Education, shall submit to Congress a report that includes— (1) an estimate of the number of women and girls in the United States at risk of or who have been subjected to female genital mutilation; (2) the protections available and actions taken, if any, by Federal, State, and local agencies to protect such women and girls; and (3) the actions taken by Federal agencies to educate and assist communities and key stakeholders about female genital mutilation. 5. Sense of the Congress It is the sense of the Congress that the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan erred in invalidating the prior version of such section 116 (See United States v. Nagarwala, 350 F. Supp. 3d 613, 631 (E.D. Mich. 2018)). The commercial nature of female genital mutilation (hereinafter in this section referred to as FGM ) is self-evident, meaning that the absence of particularized findings about the commercial nature of FGM in the predecessor statute did not call into question Congress's authority to legislate (Gonzales v. Raich, 545 U.S. 1, 21 (2005)). Nevertheless, the Congress has elected to amend the FGM statute to clarify the commercial nature of the conduct that this statute regulates. But, by doing so, Congress does not hereby ratify the district court's erroneous interpretation in Nagarwala.

tv_txt: I 116th CONGRESS 2d Session H. R. 6100 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES AN ACT To amend title 18, United States Code, to clarify the criminalization of female genital mutilation, and for other purposes.

1. Short title This Act may be cited as the Strengthening the Opposition to Female Genital Mutilation Act of 2020 or the STOP FGM Act of 2020 . 2. Congressional findings and purpose The Congress finds the following: (1) Female genital mutilation is recognized internationally as a human rights violation and a form of child abuse, gender discrimination, and violence against women and girls. Female genital mutilation is a global problem whose eradication requires international cooperation and enforcement at the national level. The United States should demonstrate its commitment to the rights of women and girls by leading the way in the international community in banning this abhorrent practice. (2) Congress has previously prohibited the commission of female genital mutilation on minors. Female genital mutilation is a heinous practice that often inflicts excruciating pain on its victims and causes them to suffer grave physical and psychological harm. (3) Congress has the power under article I, section 8 of the Constitution to make all laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into execution treaties entered into by the United States. (4) Congress also has the power under the Commerce Clause to prohibit female genital mutilation. An international market for the practice exists, and persons who perform female genital mutilation in other countries typically earn a living from doing so. (5) Those who perform this conduct often rely on a connection to interstate or foreign commerce, such as interstate or foreign travel, the transmission or receipt of communications in interstate or foreign commerce, the use of instruments traded in interstate or foreign commerce, or payments of any kind in furtherance of this conduct. (6) Amending the statute to specify a link to interstate or foreign commerce would confirm that Congress has the affirmative power to prohibit this conduct. 3. Amendments to current law on female genital mutilation Section 116 of title 18, United States Code, is amended— (1) by amending subsection (a) to read as follows: (a) Except as provided in subsection (b), whoever, in any circumstance described in subsection (d), knowingly— (1) performs, attempts to perform, or conspires to perform female genital mutilation on another person who has not attained the age of 18 years; (2) being the parent, guardian, or caretaker of a person who has not attained the age of 18 years facilitates or consents to the female genital mutilation of such person; or (3) transports a person who has not attained the age of 18 years for the purpose of the performance of female genital mutilation on such person, shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 10 years, or both. ; (2) by amending subsection (c) to read as follows: (c) It shall not be a defense to a prosecution under this section that female genital mutilation is required as a matter of religion, custom, tradition, ritual, or standard practice. ; (3) by striking subsection (d); and (4) by adding at the end the following: (d) For the purposes of subsection (a), the circumstances described in this subsection are that— (1) the defendant or victim traveled in interstate or foreign commerce, or traveled using a means, channel, facility, or instrumentality of interstate or foreign commerce, in furtherance of or in connection with the conduct described in subsection (a); (2) the defendant used a means, channel, facility, or instrumentality of interstate or foreign commerce in furtherance of or in connection with the conduct described in subsection (a); (3) any payment of any kind was made, directly or indirectly, in furtherance of or in connection with the conduct described in subsection (a) using any means, channel, facility, or instrumentality of interstate or foreign commerce or in or affecting interstate or foreign commerce; (4) the defendant transmitted in interstate or foreign commerce any communication relating to or in furtherance of the conduct described in subsection (a) using any means, channel, facility, or instrumentality of interstate or foreign commerce or in or affecting interstate or foreign commerce by any means or in manner, including by computer, mail, wire, or electromagnetic transmission; (5) any instrument, item, substance, or other object that has traveled in interstate or foreign commerce was used to perform the conduct described in subsection (a); (6) the conduct described in subsection (a) occurred within the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States, or any territory or possession of the United States; or (7) the conduct described in subsection (a) otherwise occurred in or affected interstate or foreign commerce. (e) For purposes of this section, the term female genital mutilation means any procedure performed for non-medical reasons that involves partial or total removal of, or other injury to, the external female genitalia, and includes— (1) a clitoridectomy or the partial or total removal of the clitoris or the prepuce or clitoral hood; (2) excision or the partial or total removal (with or without excision of the clitoris) of the labia minora or the labia majora, or both; (3) infibulation or the narrowing of the vaginal opening (with or without excision of the clitoris); or (4) other procedures that are harmful to the external female genitalia, including pricking, incising, scraping, or cauterizing the genital area. . 4. Report Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, and annually thereafter, the Attorney General, in consultation with the Secretary of Homeland Security, the Secretary of State, the Secretary of Health and Human Services, and the Secretary of Education, shall submit to Congress a report that includes— (1) an estimate of the number of women and girls in the United States at risk of or who have been subjected to female genital mutilation; (2) the protections available and actions taken, if any, by Federal, State, and local agencies to protect such women and girls; and (3) the actions taken by Federal agencies to educate and assist communities and key stakeholders about female genital mutilation. 5. Sense of the Congress It is the sense of the Congress that the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan erred in invalidating the prior version of such section 116 (See United States v. Nagarwala, 350 F. Supp. 3d 613, 631 (E.D. Mich. 2018)). The commercial nature of female genital mutilation (hereinafter in this section referred to as FGM ) is self-evident, meaning that the absence of particularized findings about the commercial nature of FGM in the predecessor statute did not call into question Congress's authority to legislate (Gonzales v. Raich, 545 U.S. 1, 21 (2005)). Nevertheless, the Congress has elected to amend the FGM statute to clarify the commercial nature of the conduct that this statute regulates. But, by doing so, Congress does not hereby ratify the district court's erroneous interpretation in Nagarwala. 6. Determination of budgetary effects The budgetary effects of this Act, for the purpose of complying with the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010, shall be determined by reference to the latest statement titled Budgetary Effects of PAYGO Legislation for this Act, submitted for printing in the Congressional Record by the Chairman of the House Budget Committee, provided that such statement has been submitted prior to the vote on passage.

Passed the House of Representatives September 21, 2020. Cheryl L. Johnson, Clerk.

tv_txt: IIB 116th CONGRESS 2d Session H. R. 6100 IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES September 22, 2020 Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary AN ACT To amend title 18, United States Code, to clarify the criminalization of female genital mutilation, and for other purposes.

1. Short title This Act may be cited as the Strengthening the Opposition to Female Genital Mutilation Act of 2020 or the STOP FGM Act of 2020 . 2. Congressional findings and purpose The Congress finds the following: (1) Female genital mutilation is recognized internationally as a human rights violation and a form of child abuse, gender discrimination, and violence against women and girls. Female genital mutilation is a global problem whose eradication requires international cooperation and enforcement at the national level. The United States should demonstrate its commitment to the rights of women and girls by leading the way in the international community in banning this abhorrent practice. (2) Congress has previously prohibited the commission of female genital mutilation on minors. Female genital mutilation is a heinous practice that often inflicts excruciating pain on its victims and causes them to suffer grave physical and psychological harm. (3) Congress has the power under article I, section 8 of the Constitution to make all laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into execution treaties entered into by the United States. (4) Congress also has the power under the Commerce Clause to prohibit female genital mutilation. An international market for the practice exists, and persons who perform female genital mutilation in other countries typically earn a living from doing so. (5) Those who perform this conduct often rely on a connection to interstate or foreign commerce, such as interstate or foreign travel, the transmission or receipt of communications in interstate or foreign commerce, the use of instruments traded in interstate or foreign commerce, or payments of any kind in furtherance of this conduct. (6) Amending the statute to specify a link to interstate or foreign commerce would confirm that Congress has the affirmative power to prohibit this conduct. 3. Amendments to current law on female genital mutilation Section 116 of title 18, United States Code, is amended— (1) by amending subsection (a) to read as follows: (a) Except as provided in subsection (b), whoever, in any circumstance described in subsection (d), knowingly— (1) performs, attempts to perform, or conspires to perform female genital mutilation on another person who has not attained the age of 18 years; (2) being the parent, guardian, or caretaker of a person who has not attained the age of 18 years facilitates or consents to the female genital mutilation of such person; or (3) transports a person who has not attained the age of 18 years for the purpose of the performance of female genital mutilation on such person, shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 10 years, or both. ; (2) by amending subsection (c) to read as follows: (c) It shall not be a defense to a prosecution under this section that female genital mutilation is required as a matter of religion, custom, tradition, ritual, or standard practice. ; (3) by striking subsection (d); and (4) by adding at the end the following: (d) For the purposes of subsection (a), the circumstances described in this subsection are that— (1) the defendant or victim traveled in interstate or foreign commerce, or traveled using a means, channel, facility, or instrumentality of interstate or foreign commerce, in furtherance of or in connection with the conduct described in subsection (a); (2) the defendant used a means, channel, facility, or instrumentality of interstate or foreign commerce in furtherance of or in connection with the conduct described in subsection (a); (3) any payment of any kind was made, directly or indirectly, in furtherance of or in connection with the conduct described in subsection (a) using any means, channel, facility, or instrumentality of interstate or foreign commerce or in or affecting interstate or foreign commerce; (4) the defendant transmitted in interstate or foreign commerce any communication relating to or in furtherance of the conduct described in subsection (a) using any means, channel, facility, or instrumentality of interstate or foreign commerce or in or affecting interstate or foreign commerce by any means or in manner, including by computer, mail, wire, or electromagnetic transmission; (5) any instrument, item, substance, or other object that has traveled in interstate or foreign commerce was used to perform the conduct described in subsection (a); (6) the conduct described in subsection (a) occurred within the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States, or any territory or possession of the United States; or (7) the conduct described in subsection (a) otherwise occurred in or affected interstate or foreign commerce. (e) For purposes of this section, the term female genital mutilation means any procedure performed for non-medical reasons that involves partial or total removal of, or other injury to, the external female genitalia, and includes— (1) a clitoridectomy or the partial or total removal of the clitoris or the prepuce or clitoral hood; (2) excision or the partial or total removal (with or without excision of the clitoris) of the labia minora or the labia majora, or both; (3) infibulation or the narrowing of the vaginal opening (with or without excision of the clitoris); or (4) other procedures that are harmful to the external female genitalia, including pricking, incising, scraping, or cauterizing the genital area. . 4. Report Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, and annually thereafter, the Attorney General, in consultation with the Secretary of Homeland Security, the Secretary of State, the Secretary of Health and Human Services, and the Secretary of Education, shall submit to Congress a report that includes— (1) an estimate of the number of women and girls in the United States at risk of or who have been subjected to female genital mutilation; (2) the protections available and actions taken, if any, by Federal, State, and local agencies to protect such women and girls; and (3) the actions taken by Federal agencies to educate and assist communities and key stakeholders about female genital mutilation. 5. Sense of the Congress It is the sense of the Congress that the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan erred in invalidating the prior version of such section 116 (See United States v. Nagarwala, 350 F. Supp. 3d 613, 631 (E.D. Mich. 2018)). The commercial nature of female genital mutilation (hereinafter in this section referred to as FGM ) is self-evident, meaning that the absence of particularized findings about the commercial nature of FGM in the predecessor statute did not call into question Congress's authority to legislate (Gonzales v. Raich, 545 U.S. 1, 21 (2005)). Nevertheless, the Congress has elected to amend the FGM statute to clarify the commercial nature of the conduct that this statute regulates. But, by doing so, Congress does not hereby ratify the district court's erroneous interpretation in Nagarwala. 6. Determination of budgetary effects The budgetary effects of this Act, for the purpose of complying with the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010, shall be determined by reference to the latest statement titled Budgetary Effects of PAYGO Legislation for this Act, submitted for printing in the Congressional Record by the Chairman of the House Budget Committee, provided that such statement has been submitted prior to the vote on passage.

Passed the House of Representatives September 21, 2020. Cheryl L. Johnson, Clerk.

tv_txt: IB Union Calendar No. 406 116th CONGRESS 2d Session H. R. 6100 [Report No. 116–506] IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES March 5, 2020 Ms. Jackson Lee (for herself and Mr. Bacon ) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary September 16, 2020 Additional sponsor: Ms. Garcia of Texas September 16, 2020 Reported from the Committee on the Judiciary ; committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union and ordered to be printed A BILL To amend title 18, United States Code, to clarify the criminalization of female genital mutilation, and for other purposes.

1. Short title This Act may be cited as the Strengthening the Opposition to Female Genital Mutilation Act of 2020 or the STOP FGM Act of 2020 . 2. Congressional findings and purpose The Congress finds the following: (1) Female genital mutilation is recognized internationally as a human rights violation and a form of child abuse, gender discrimination, and violence against women and girls. Female genital mutilation is a global problem whose eradication requires international cooperation and enforcement at the national level. The United States should demonstrate its commitment to the rights of women and girls by leading the way in the international community in banning this abhorrent practice. (2) Congress has previously prohibited the commission of female genital mutilation on minors. Female genital mutilation is a heinous practice that often inflicts excruciating pain on its victims and causes them to suffer grave physical and psychological harm. (3) Congress has the power under article I, section 8 of the Constitution to make all laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into execution treaties entered into by the United States. (4) Congress also has the power under the Commerce Clause to prohibit female genital mutilation. An international market for the practice exists, and persons who perform female genital mutilation in other countries typically earn a living from doing so. (5) Those who perform this conduct often rely on a connection to interstate or foreign commerce, such as interstate or foreign travel, the transmission or receipt of communications in interstate or foreign commerce, the use of instruments traded in interstate or foreign commerce, or payments of any kind in furtherance of this conduct. (6) Amending the statute to specify a link to interstate or foreign commerce would confirm that Congress has the affirmative power to prohibit this conduct. 3. Amendments to current law on female genital mutilation Section 116 of title 18, United States Code, is amended— (1) by amending subsection (a) to read as follows: (a) Except as provided in subsection (b), whoever, in any circumstance described in subsection (d), knowingly— (1) performs, attempts to perform, or conspires to perform female genital mutilation on another person who has not attained the age of 18 years; (2) being the parent, guardian, or caretaker of a person who has not attained the age of 18 years facilitates or consents to the female genital mutilation of such person; or (3) transports a person who has not attained the age of 18 years for the purpose of the performance of female genital mutilation on such person, shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 10 years, or both. ; (2) by amending subsection (c) to read as follows: (c) It shall not be a defense to a prosecution under this section that female genital mutilation is required as a matter of religion, custom, tradition, ritual, or standard practice. ; (3) by striking subsection (d); and (4) by adding at the end the following: (d) For the purposes of subsection (a), the circumstances described in this subsection are that— (1) the defendant or victim traveled in interstate or foreign commerce, or traveled using a means, channel, facility, or instrumentality of interstate or foreign commerce, in furtherance of or in connection with the conduct described in subsection (a); (2) the defendant used a means, channel, facility, or instrumentality of interstate or foreign commerce in furtherance of or in connection with the conduct described in subsection (a); (3) any payment of any kind was made, directly or indirectly, in furtherance of or in connection with the conduct described in subsection (a) using any means, channel, facility, or instrumentality of interstate or foreign commerce or in or affecting interstate or foreign commerce; (4) the defendant transmitted in interstate or foreign commerce any communication relating to or in furtherance of the conduct described in subsection (a) using any means, channel, facility, or instrumentality of interstate or foreign commerce or in or affecting interstate or foreign commerce by any means or in manner, including by computer, mail, wire, or electromagnetic transmission; (5) any instrument, item, substance, or other object that has traveled in interstate or foreign commerce was used to perform the conduct described in subsection (a); (6) the conduct described in subsection (a) occurred within the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States, or any territory or possession of the United States; or (7) the conduct described in subsection (a) otherwise occurred in or affected interstate or foreign commerce. (e) For purposes of this section, the term female genital mutilation means any procedure performed for non-medical reasons that involves partial or total removal of, or other injury to, the external female genitalia, and includes— (1) a clitoridectomy or the partial or total removal of the clitoris or the prepuce or clitoral hood; (2) excision or the partial or total removal (with or without excision of the clitoris) of the labia minora or the labia majora, or both; (3) infibulation or the narrowing of the vaginal opening (with or without excision of the clitoris); or (4) other procedures that are harmful to the external female genitalia, including pricking, incising, scraping, or cauterizing the genital area. . 4. Report Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, and annually thereafter, the Attorney General, in consultation with the Secretary of Homeland Security, the Secretary of State, the Secretary of Health and Human Services, and the Secretary of Education, shall submit to Congress a report that includes— (1) an estimate of the number of women and girls in the United States at risk of or who have been subjected to female genital mutilation; (2) the protections available and actions taken, if any, by Federal, State, and local agencies to protect such women and girls; and (3) the actions taken by Federal agencies to educate and assist communities and key stakeholders about female genital mutilation. 5. Sense of the Congress It is the sense of the Congress that the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan erred in invalidating the prior version of such section 116 (See United States v. Nagarwala, 350 F. Supp. 3d 613, 631 (E.D. Mich. 2018)). The commercial nature of female genital mutilation (hereinafter in this section referred to as FGM ) is self-evident, meaning that the absence of particularized findings about the commercial nature of FGM in the predecessor statute did not call into question Congress's authority to legislate (Gonzales v. Raich, 545 U.S. 1, 21 (2005)). Nevertheless, the Congress has elected to amend the FGM statute to clarify the commercial nature of the conduct that this statute regulates. But, by doing so, Congress does not hereby ratify the district court's erroneous interpretation in Nagarwala.

September 16, 2020 Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union and ordered to be printed

tv_txt: I One Hundred Sixteenth Congress of the United States of America At the Second Session Begun and held at the City of Washington on Friday, the third day of January, two thousand and twenty H. R. 6100 AN ACT To amend title 18, United States Code, to clarify the criminalization of female genital mutilation, and for other purposes.

1. Short title This Act may be cited as the Strengthening the Opposition to Female Genital Mutilation Act of 2020 or the STOP FGM Act of 2020 . 2. Congressional findings and purpose The Congress finds the following: (1) Female genital mutilation is recognized internationally as a human rights violation and a form of child abuse, gender discrimination, and violence against women and girls. Female genital mutilation is a global problem whose eradication requires international cooperation and enforcement at the national level. The United States should demonstrate its commitment to the rights of women and girls by leading the way in the international community in banning this abhorrent practice. (2) Congress has previously prohibited the commission of female genital mutilation on minors. Female genital mutilation is a heinous practice that often inflicts excruciating pain on its victims and causes them to suffer grave physical and psychological harm. (3) Congress has the power under article I, section 8 of the Constitution to make all laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into execution treaties entered into by the United States. (4) Congress also has the power under the Commerce Clause to prohibit female genital mutilation. An international market for the practice exists, and persons who perform female genital mutilation in other countries typically earn a living from doing so. (5) Those who perform this conduct often rely on a connection to interstate or foreign commerce, such as interstate or foreign travel, the transmission or receipt of communications in interstate or foreign commerce, the use of instruments traded in interstate or foreign commerce, or payments of any kind in furtherance of this conduct. (6) Amending the statute to specify a link to interstate or foreign commerce would confirm that Congress has the affirmative power to prohibit this conduct. 3. Amendments to current law on female genital mutilation Section 116 of title 18, United States Code, is amended— (1) by amending subsection (a) to read as follows: (a) Except as provided in subsection (b), whoever, in any circumstance described in subsection (d), knowingly— (1) performs, attempts to perform, or conspires to perform female genital mutilation on another person who has not attained the age of 18 years; (2) being the parent, guardian, or caretaker of a person who has not attained the age of 18 years facilitates or consents to the female genital mutilation of such person; or (3) transports a person who has not attained the age of 18 years for the purpose of the performance of female genital mutilation on such person, shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 10 years, or both. ; (2) by amending subsection (c) to read as follows: (c) It shall not be a defense to a prosecution under this section that female genital mutilation is required as a matter of religion, custom, tradition, ritual, or standard practice. ; (3) by striking subsection (d); and (4) by adding at the end the following: (d) For the purposes of subsection (a), the circumstances described in this subsection are that— (1) the defendant or victim traveled in interstate or foreign commerce, or traveled using a means, channel, facility, or instrumentality of interstate or foreign commerce, in furtherance of or in connection with the conduct described in subsection (a); (2) the defendant used a means, channel, facility, or instrumentality of interstate or foreign commerce in furtherance of or in connection with the conduct described in subsection (a); (3) any payment of any kind was made, directly or indirectly, in furtherance of or in connection with the conduct described in subsection (a) using any means, channel, facility, or instrumentality of interstate or foreign commerce or in or affecting interstate or foreign commerce; (4) the defendant transmitted in interstate or foreign commerce any communication relating to or in furtherance of the conduct described in subsection (a) using any means, channel, facility, or instrumentality of interstate or foreign commerce or in or affecting interstate or foreign commerce by any means or in manner, including by computer, mail, wire, or electromagnetic transmission; (5) any instrument, item, substance, or other object that has traveled in interstate or foreign commerce was used to perform the conduct described in subsection (a); (6) the conduct described in subsection (a) occurred within the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States, or any territory or possession of the United States; or (7) the conduct described in subsection (a) otherwise occurred in or affected interstate or foreign commerce. (e) For purposes of this section, the term female genital mutilation means any procedure performed for non-medical reasons that involves partial or total removal of, or other injury to, the external female genitalia, and includes— (1) a clitoridectomy or the partial or total removal of the clitoris or the prepuce or clitoral hood; (2) excision or the partial or total removal (with or without excision of the clitoris) of the labia minora or the labia majora, or both; (3) infibulation or the narrowing of the vaginal opening (with or without excision of the clitoris); or (4) other procedures that are harmful to the external female genitalia, including pricking, incising, scraping, or cauterizing the genital area. . 4. Report Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, and annually thereafter, the Attorney General, in consultation with the Secretary of Homeland Security, the Secretary of State, the Secretary of Health and Human Services, and the Secretary of Education, shall submit to Congress a report that includes— (1) an estimate of the number of women and girls in the United States at risk of or who have been subjected to female genital mutilation; (2) the protections available and actions taken, if any, by Federal, State, and local agencies to protect such women and girls; and (3) the actions taken by Federal agencies to educate and assist communities and key stakeholders about female genital mutilation. 5. Sense of the Congress It is the sense of the Congress that the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan erred in invalidating the prior version of such section 116 (See United States v. Nagarwala, 350 F. Supp. 3d 613, 631 (E.D. Mich. 2018)). The commercial nature of female genital mutilation (hereinafter in this section referred to as FGM ) is self-evident, meaning that the absence of particularized findings about the commercial nature of FGM in the predecessor statute did not call into question Congress's authority to legislate (Gonzales v. Raich, 545 U.S. 1, 21 (2005)). Nevertheless, the Congress has elected to amend the FGM statute to clarify the commercial nature of the conduct that this statute regulates. But, by doing so, Congress does not hereby ratify the district court's erroneous interpretation in Nagarwala. 6. Determination of budgetary effects The budgetary effects of this Act, for the purpose of complying with the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010, shall be determined by reference to the latest statement titled Budgetary Effects of PAYGO Legislation for this Act, submitted for printing in the Congressional Record by the Chairman of the House Budget Committee, provided that such statement has been submitted prior to the vote on passage.

Speaker of the House of Representatives. Vice President of the United States and President of the Senate.