Workplace Choice and Flexibility for Individuals with Disabilities Act

Bill: 116-hr-8341
Sponsor: full_name: Rep. Grothman, Glenn [R-WI-6]
Introduced: 2020-09-22
Policy area: Labor and Employment
Subjects: Disability and paralysis

Employment and training programs

Public contracts and procurement

Wages and earnings
Latest action: action_date: 2020-09-22
text: Referred to the House Committee on Education and Labor.

Summaries:
action_date: 2020-09-22
action_desc: Introduced in House
text: <p><b>Workplace Choice and Flexibility for Individuals with Disabilities Act</b></p> <p>This bill modifies the definition of <i>competitive integrated employment</i> under the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 to include (1) jobs under federal and state set-aside contracts mandating direct labor-hour ratio of individuals with disabilities; and (2) work that involves social and interpersonal interactions with colleagues, vendors, customers, superiors, or other such persons with whom a disabled employee may come into contact during the work day and across workplace settings.</p>

tv_txt: I 116th CONGRESS 2d Session H. R. 8341 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES September 22, 2020 Mr. Grothman introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and Labor A BILL To amend the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 to clarify the definition of competitive integrated employment.

1. Short title This Act may be cited as the Workplace Choice and Flexibility for Individuals with Disabilities Act . 2. Clarification of definition of competitive integrated employment Section 7(5) of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 ( 29 U.S.C. 705 ) is amended— (1) in subparagraph (B)— (A) by striking not including and inserting including social and interpersonal interactions with colleagues, vendors, customers, superiors, or other such persons who the employee may come into contact with during the work day and across workplace settings, other than ; (B) by inserting before the semicolon at the end the following: , except that such interactions shall not be considered solely at the work unit level ; and (C) by striking and at the end; (2) by striking the period at the end of subparagraph (C) and inserting ; and ; and (3) by adding at the end the following: (D) for which an individual may have been paid— (i) by a contractor— (I) of the Federal Government under a contract with the Federal Government for which priority was given to the contractor on the basis of the bid of the contractor involving supporting employment for individuals with disabilities; or (II) of a State government under a contract with the State government for which priority was given to the contractor on the basis of the bid of the contractor involving supporting employment for individuals with disabilities; (ii) by a subcontractor at any tier of a contractor— (I) of the Federal Government under a subcontract for which priority was given to the subcontractor on the basis of the bid of the subcontractor involving supporting employment for individuals with disabilities; or (II) of a State government under a subcontract for which priority was given to the subcontractor on the basis of the bid of the subcontractor involving supporting employment for individuals with disabilities; or (iii) under a contract mandating direct labor-hour ratio of individuals with disabilities. . 3. Rule of construction Nothing in the amendments made by this Act shall be construed to reduce the number of jobs available for referral by a State agency or other entity. 4. Sense of Congress It is the sense of Congress that jobs meeting the definition in section 7(5)(B) of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 ( 29 U.S.C. 705 ), and which derive from Federal or State contracts managed by community rehabilitation programs for the purposes of supporting employment for people with disabilities, shall be eligible to be considered— (1) part of the competitive labor market; and (2) an employment outcome for State vocational rehabilitation purposes.