No Unconstitutional War Against North Korea Act of 2020

Bill: 116-hr-6639
Sponsor: full_name: Rep. Khanna, Ro [D-CA-17]
Introduced: 2020-04-28
Policy area: International Affairs
Subjects: Alliances

Arms control and nonproliferation

Asia

Conflicts and wars

Congressional oversight

Defense spending

Diplomacy, foreign officials, Americans abroad

Japan

Military operations and strategy

Military personnel and dependents

North Korea

Nuclear weapons

Presidents and presidential powers, Vice Presidents

South Korea

War and emergency powers
Latest action: action_date: 2020-04-28
text: Referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and in addition to the Committee on Armed Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

Summaries:
action_date: 2020-04-28
action_desc: Introduced in House
text: <p><b>No Unconstitutional War Against North Korea Act of 2020</b></p> <p>This bill prohibits the use of federal funds for military force in or against North Korea unless (1) Congress has declared war, (2) Congress has enacted specific statutory authority for such military force, or (3) the President is exercising powers as Commander-in-Chief in a national emergency stemming from an attack against the United States or the Armed Forces.</p>

tv_txt: I 116th CONGRESS 2d Session H. R. 6639 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES April 28, 2020 Mr. Khanna introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs , and in addition to the Committee on Armed Services , for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned A BILL To prevent an unconstitutional war against North Korea.

1. Short title This Act may be cited as the No Unconstitutional War Against North Korea Act of 2020 . 2. Findings Congress makes the following findings: (1) The President is currently prohibited from initiating a war or launching a first strike without congressional approval under the United States Constitution and United States law. (2) The Constitution, in article I, section 8, grants Congress the sole power to declare war. (3) George Washington, in a letter to William Moultrie dated August 28, 1793, wrote, The constitution vests the power of declaring war in Congress; therefore no offensive expedition of importance can be undertaken until after they shall have deliberated upon the subject and authorized such a measure. . (4) In Examination Number 1 of the Hamilton Papers, dated December 17, 1801, Alexander Hamilton wrote, The Congress shall have the power to declare war; the plain meaning of which is, that it is the peculiar and exclusive duty of Congress, when the nation is at peace, to change that state into a state of war. . (5) James Madison wrote, in Madison Papers, Helvidius, Number 4, dated September 14, 1793, The power to declare war, including the power of judging the causes of war, is fully and exclusively vested in the legislature … the executive has no right, in any case, to decide the question, whether there is or is not cause for declaring war. . (6) Section 2(c) of the War Powers Resolution ( 50 U.S.C. 1541(c) ) states that the constitutional powers of the President as Commander-in-Chief to introduce United States Armed Forces into hostilities, or into situations where imminent involvement in hostilities is clearly indicated by the circumstances, are exercised only pursuant to (1) a declaration of war, (2) specific statutory authorization, or (3) a national emergency created by attack upon the United States, its territories or possessions, or its armed forces . (7) On April 12, 2018, then-Director of the Central Intelligence Agency, Mike Pompeo, testified before the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate that he believed the President had the authority to send U.S. military forces into action even if none of the qualifications of section 2(c) of the War Powers Resolution are met. (8) On February 13, 2020, a bipartisan majority in the Senate directed the President to remove Armed Forces from hostilities against Iran or any part of its government or military, unless otherwise explicitly authorized by Congress, following passage of a similar measure in the House of Representatives on January 9, 2020. (9) The United States has approximately 28,500 members of the Armed Forces stationed in Korea, and over 100,000 United States citizens in total, all of whom would be placed in grave danger if an active military conflict on the Korean Peninsula were to erupt. 3. Prohibition on unconstitutional military strikes against North Korea (a) Prohibition of authorized military force In or against North Korea Except as provided in subsection (b), no Federal funds may be obligated or expended for any use of military force in or against North Korea unless Congress has— (1) declared war; or (2) enacted specific statutory authorization for such use of military force after the date of the enactment of this Act that meets the requirements of the War Powers Resolution ( 50 U.S.C. 1541 et seq.). (b) Exception The prohibition under subsection (a) shall not apply to a use of military force that is consistent with section 2(c) of the War Powers Resolution. (c) Rule of construction Nothing in this section may be construed— (1) to prevent the President from using necessary and appropriate force to defend United States allies and partners if Congress enacts specific statutory authorization for such use of force consistent with the requirements of the War Powers Resolution ( 50 U.S.C. 1541 et seq.); (2) to relieve the executive branch of restrictions on the use of force, reporting, or consultation requirements set forth in the War Powers Resolution ( 50 U.S.C. 1541 et seq.); or (3) to authorize the use of military force. 4. Sense of Congress in support of diplomatic resolution to growing tensions with North Korea It is the sense of Congress that— (1) a conflict on the Korean peninsula would have catastrophic consequences for the American people, for members of the United States Armed Forces stationed in the region, for United States interests, for United States allies the Republic of Korea and Japan, for the long-suffering people of North Korea, and for global peace and security more broadly, and that actions and statements that increase tensions and could lead to miscalculation should be avoided; and (2) the President, in coordination with United States allies, should explore and pursue every feasible opportunity to engage in talks with the Government of North Korea on concrete steps to reduce tensions and improve communication, and to reinvigorate high-level negotiations aimed at achieving a diplomatic agreement consistent with the June 12, 2018, Joint Statement of President Donald J. Trump of the United States of America and Chairman Kim Jong Un of the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea at the Singapore Summit.