Martha Wright-Reed Just and Reasonable Communications Act of 2019

Bill: 116-s-1764
Sponsor: full_name: Sen. Duckworth, Tammy [D-IL]
Introduced: 2019-06-10
Policy area: Science, Technology, Communications
Subjects: Consumer affairs

Correctional facilities and imprisonment

Telecommunication rates and fees

Telephone and wireless communication
Latest action: action_date: 2019-06-10
text: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.

Summaries:
action_date: 2019-06-10
action_desc: Introduced in Senate
text: <p><strong>Martha Wright-Reed Just and Reasonable Communications Act of 2019 </strong></p> <p>This bill requires the Federal Communications Commission to ensure charges for payphone services, including those in correctional institutions, are&nbsp;just and reasonable. </p>

tv_txt: II 116th CONGRESS 1st Session S. 1764 IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES June 10, 2019 Ms. Duckworth (for herself, Mr. Portman , Mr. Schatz , Mr. Booker , Mr. King , and Mr. Markey ) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation A BILL To amend the Communications Act of 1934 to require the Federal Communications Commission to ensure just and reasonable charges for telephone and advanced communications services in correctional and detention facilities.

1. Short title This Act may be cited as the Martha Wright-Reed Just and Reasonable Communications Act of 2019 . 2. Findings Congress finds the following: (1) Prison, jails, and detention centers in the United States have unique telecommunications needs due to safety and security concerns. (2) Unjust and unreasonable charges negatively impact the safety and security of communities in the United States by exacerbating recidivism by damaging relationships between incarcerated people and their support systems. (3) It is the policy of the United States to ensure that all people in the United States, including anyone who pays for communications with incarcerated people via telephone and advanced communications, are afforded just and reasonable charges for all communications services. (4) The current correctional facilities communications market suffers from market failure. Among other issues, consumers cannot choose among competing providers, which produces locational monopolies and monopoly profits at the expense of rate-payers. (5) Charges for communicating with individuals detained in prisons, jails, and detention centers have been shown to be unjust and unreasonable as a result of industry practices and lack of competition. (6) Unjust and unreasonable charges extend to telephone and advanced communications services and to both intrastate and interstate communications. (7) Mrs. Martha Wright-Reed of Washington, DC, led a campaign for just calling rates for incarcerated people for over a decade. Mrs. Wright-Reed was the lead plaintiff in Wright v. Corrections Corporation of America, CA No. 00–293 (GK) (D.D.C. 2001), which ultimately led to the Wright Petition at the Federal Communications Commission, CC Docket No. 96–128 (Nov. 3, 2003). Mrs. Wright-Reed became involved, when, as a grandmother, she was forced to choose between purchasing medication and communicating with her incarcerated grandson. Mrs. Wright-Reed passed away on January 18, 2015, before fully realizing her dream of just communications rates for all people. (8) After the Federal Communications Commission granted the petition Wright Petition described in paragraph (7), the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit reversed the Federal Communications Commission by interpreting section 276 of the Communications Act of 1934 ( 47 U.S.C. 276 ) in the case of Global Tel*Link v. Federal Communications Commission, 866 F.3d 397 (D.C. Cir. 2017), in part by constricting the meaning of the word fair and limiting the means by which the Federal Communications Commission can calculate fair, just, and reasonable charges. 3. Technical amendments (a) In general Section 276 of the Communications Act of 1934 ( 47 U.S.C. 276 ) is amended— (1) in subsection (b)(1)(A)— (A) by striking per call ; (B) by inserting , and all charges are just and reasonable, after fairly compensated ; (C) by striking each and every ; and (D) by striking call using and inserting communications using ; and (2) in subsection (d), by inserting and advanced communications services after inmate telephone service . (b) Definition of advanced communications services Section 3(1) of the Communications Act of 1934 ( 47 U.S.C. 153(1) ) is amended— (1) in subparagraph (C), by striking and at the end; (2) in subparagraph (D), by striking the period at the end and inserting ; and ; and (3) by adding at the end the following: (E) any audio or video communications service provided at a correctional institution, regardless of technology used. . (c) Application of the Act Section 2(b) of the Communications Act of 1934 ( 47 U.S.C. 152(b) ) is amended by inserting section 276, after sections 223 through 227, inclusive, . 4. Implementation (a) Rulemaking Not later than 18 months after the date of enactment of this Act, the Federal Communications Commission shall promulgate any regulations necessary to implement this Act and the amendments made by this Act. (b) Use of data In implementing this Act and the amendments made by this Act, including by promulgating regulations under subsection (a) and determining just and reasonable rates, the Federal Communications Commission may use industry average costs and collect and analyze such data as the Commission determines necessary.