Israel Anti-Boycott Act

Bill: 115-s-720
Sponsor: full_name: Sen. Cardin, Benjamin L. [D-MD]
Introduced: 2017-03-23
Policy area: Foreign Trade and International Finance
Subjects: Arab-Israeli relations

Competitiveness, trade promotion, trade deficits

Corporate finance and management

Europe

European Union

Government lending and loan guarantees

International organizations and cooperation

Israel

Middle East

Sanctions

Scientific communication

Technology transfer and commercialization

Trade restrictions

U.S. and foreign investments

United Nations
Latest action: action_date: 2017-03-23
text: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs. (consideration: CR S7453; text: CR S7436)

Summaries:
action_date: 2017-03-23
action_desc: Introduced in Senate
text: <p><b>Israel Anti-Boycott Act</b></p> <p>This bill declares that Congress: (1) opposes the United Nations Human Rights Council resolution of March 24, 2016, which urges countries to pressure companies to divest from, or break contracts with, Israel; and (2) encourages full implementation of the United States-Israel Strategic Partnership Act of 2014 through enhanced, governmentwide, coordinated U.S.-Israel scientific and technological cooperation in civilian areas. </p> <p>The bill amends the Export Administration Act of 1979 to declare that it shall be U.S. policy to oppose: </p> <ul> <li>requests by foreign countries to impose restrictive practices or boycotts against other countries friendly to the United States or against U.S. persons; and </li> <li>restrictive trade practices or boycotts fostered or imposed by an international governmental organization, or requests to impose such practices or boycotts, against Israel. </li> </ul> <p>The bill prohibits any U.S. person engaged interstate or foreign commerce from supporting: </p> <ul> <li> any request by a foreign country to impose any boycott against a country that is friendly to the United States and that is not itself the object of any form of boycott pursuant to United States law or regulation, or </li> <li> any boycott fostered or imposed by any international governmental organization against Israel or any request by any international governmental organization to impose such a boycott.</li> </ul> <p>The bill amends the Export-Import Bank Act of 1945 to include as a reason for the Export-Import Bank to deny credit applications for the export of goods and services between the United States and foreign countries, opposition to policies and actions that are politically motivated and are intended to penalize or otherwise limit commercial relations specifically with citizens or residents of Israel, entities organized under the laws of Israel, or the government of Israel.</p>

tv_txt: II 115th CONGRESS 1st Session S. 720 IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES March 23, 2017 Mr. Cardin (for himself and Mr. Portman ) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs A BILL To amend the Export Administration Act of 1979 to include in the prohibitions on boycotts against allies of the United States boycotts fostered by international governmental organizations against Israel and to direct the Export-Import Bank of the United States to oppose boycotts against Israel, and for other purposes.

1. Short title This Act may be cited as the Israel Anti-Boycott Act . 2. Findings Congress finds the following: (1) The United Nations Human Rights Council (in this section referred to as the UNHRC ) has long targeted Israel with systematic, politically motivated, assaults on its legitimacy designed to stigmatize and isolate Israel internationally. (2) The UNHRC maintains a permanent agenda item known as Item 7 to ensure that Israel will be criticized at every gathering of the UNHRC. (3) At its 31st session on March 24, 2016, the UNHRC targeted Israel with a commercial boycott, calling for the establishment of a database, such as a blacklist , of companies that operate, or have business relations with entities that operate, beyond Israel’s 1949 Armistice lines, including East Jerusalem. (4) At its 32nd session in March 2017, the UNHRC is considering a resolution pursuant to agenda item 7 to withhold assistance from and prevent trade with territories occupied since 1967 , including East Jerusalem, the West Bank, and the Golan Heights, stating that businesses that engage in economic activity in those areas could face civil or criminal legal action. (5) For a half century, Congress has combated anti-Israel boycotts and other discriminatory activity under the Export Administration Act of 1979 (as continued in effect pursuant to the International Emergency Economic Powers Act ( 50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.)), under part VI of title X of the Tax Reform Act of 1976 ( Public Law 94–455 ; 90 Stat. 1649) (commonly referred to as the Ribicoff Amendment ), in free trade agreements with Bahrain and Oman, and in Saudi Arabia’s accession negotiations to the World Trade Organization. (6) The recent action of the UNHRC is reminiscent of the Arab League Boycott, which also called for the establishment of a blacklist and promoted a primary, as well as a secondary and tertiary, boycott against Israel, targeting United States and other companies that trade or invest with or in Israel, designed to harm Israel, any business operating in, or doing business with, Israel, or companies that do business with companies operating in Israel. (7) Congress recently passed anti-boycott, divestment, and sanctions measures in the Bipartisan Congressional Trade Priorities and Accountability Act of 2015 ( 19 U.S.C. 4201 et seq.) and section 909 of the Trade Facilitation and Trade Enforcement Act of 2015 ( 19 U.S.C. 4452 ), which establish, among other things— (A) the opposition of the United States to actions to boycott, divest from, or sanction Israel; (B) requirements that the United States utilize trade negotiations to combat state-led or international governmental organization-led actions to boycott, divest from, or sanction Israel; and (C) reporting requirements regarding the actions of foreign countries or international organizations that establish barriers to trade or investment for United States companies in or with Israel. 3. Statement of policy Congress— (1) opposes the United Nations Human Rights Council resolution of March 24, 2016, which urges countries to pressure their own companies to divest from, or break contracts with, Israel, and calls for the creation of a blacklist of companies that either operate, or have business relations with entities that operate, beyond Israel’s 1949 Armistice lines, including East Jerusalem; (2) views such policies as actions to boycott, divest from, or sanction Israel; and (3) in order to counter the effects of actions to boycott, divest from, or sanction Israel, encourages full implementation of the United States-Israel Strategic Partnership Act of 2014 ( Public Law 113–296 ; 128 Stat. 4075) through enhanced, governmentwide, coordinated United States-Israel scientific and technological cooperation in civilian areas such as with respect to energy, water, agriculture, alternative fuel technology, civilian space technology, and security. 4. Additional prohibitions relating to foreign boycotts under Export Administration Act of 1979 (a) Declaration of policy Section 3(5) of the Export Administration Act of 1979 ( 50 U.S.C. 4602(5) ) (as continued in effect pursuant to the International Emergency Economic Powers Act ( 50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.)) is amended— (1) by amending subparagraph (A) to read as follows: (A) to oppose— (i) restrictive trade practices or boycotts fostered or imposed by foreign countries, or requests to impose restrictive trade practices or boycotts by foreign countries, against other countries friendly to the United States or against any United States person; and (ii) restrictive trade practices or boycotts fostered or imposed by any international governmental organization against Israel or requests to impose restrictive trade practices or boycotts by any international governmental organization against Israel; ; and (2) in subparagraph (B), by striking which have the effect and all the follows and inserting the following: which have the effect of furthering or supporting— (i) restrictive trade practices or boycotts fostered or imposed by any foreign country, or requests to impose restrictive trade practices or boycotts by any foreign country, against a country friendly to the United States or against any United States person; and (ii) restrictive trade practices or boycotts fostered or imposed by any international governmental organization against Israel or requests to impose restrictive trade practices or boycotts by any international governmental organization against Israel; and . (b) Foreign boycotts Section 8 of the Export Administration Act of 1979 ( 50 U.S.C. 4607 ) (as continued in effect pursuant to the International Emergency Economic Powers Act ( 50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.)) is amended— (1) in subsection (a)(1)— (A) in the matter preceding subparagraph (A)— (i) by inserting , or request to impose any boycott by a foreign country, after a foreign country ; (ii) by inserting , or support any boycott fostered or imposed by any international governmental organization against Israel or request to impose any boycott by any international governmental organization against Israel after pursuant to United States law or regulation ; (B) in subparagraph (A), by inserting or international governmental organization (as the case may be) after of the boycotting country ; and (C) in subparagraph (D)— (i) by inserting , or requesting the furnishing of information, after Furnishing information ; and (ii) by inserting or with the international governmental organization (as the case may be) after in the boycotting country ; and (2) in subsection (c)— (A) by inserting , or requests to impose restrictive trade practices or boycotts by foreign countries, after foreign countries ; and (B) by inserting or restrictive trade practices or boycotts fostered or imposed by any international governmental organization against Israel or requests to impose restrictive trade practices or boycotts by any international governmental organization against Israel before the period at the end. (c) Violations of section 8(a) Section 11 of the Export Administration Act of 1979 ( 50 U.S.C. 4610 ) (as continued in effect pursuant to the International Emergency Economic Powers Act ( 50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.)) is amended— (1) in subsection (a), by inserting or (j) after subsection (b) ; and (2) by adding at the end the following: (j) Violations of section 8(a) Whoever knowingly violates or conspires to or attempts to violate any provision of section 8(a) or any regulation, order, or license issued thereunder shall be fined in accordance with section 206 of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act ( 50 U.S.C. 1705 ). . (d) Definition of international governmental organization Section 16 of the Export Administration Act of 1979 ( 50 U.S.C. 4618 ) (as continued in effect pursuant to the International Emergency Economic Powers Act ( 50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.)) is amended— (1) by redesignating paragraphs (7) and (8) as paragraphs (8) and (9), respectively; and (2) by inserting after paragraph (6) the following: (7) the term international governmental organization includes the United Nations and the European Union; . (e) Effective date The amendments made by this section take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act and apply with respect to actions described in section 8(a) of the Export Administration Act of 1979 (as continued in effect pursuant to the International Emergency Economic Powers Act ( 50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.)) taken or knowingly agreed to be taken on or after such date of enactment. (f) Implementation The President shall implement the amendments made by this section by exercising the authorities of the President under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act ( 50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.). 5. Policy of the United States relating to boycott of Israel under Export-Import Bank Act of 1945 Section 2(b)(1)(B) of the Export-Import Bank Act of 1945 ( 12 U.S.C. 635(b)(1)(B) ) is amended in the sixth sentence by inserting after child labor), the following: or opposing policies and actions that are politically motivated and are intended to penalize or otherwise limit commercial relations specifically with citizens or residents of Israel, entities organized under the laws of Israel, or the Government of Israel, . 6. Definitions (a) In general In this Act: (1) Actions to boycott, divest from, or sanction Israel The term actions to boycott, divest from, or sanction Israel has the meaning given that term in section 102(b)(20)(B) of the Bipartisan Congressional Trade Priorities and Accountability Act of 2015 ( 19 U.S.C. 4201(b)(20)(B) ). (2) International governmental organization The term international governmental organization includes the United Nations and the European Union. (3) Politically motivated The term politically motivated means actions to impede or constrain commerce with Israel that are intended to coerce political action from or impose policy positions on Israel. (b) Rule of construction Nothing in this section shall be construed to alter the established policy of the United States or to establish new United States policy concerning final status issues associated with the Arab-Israeli conflict, including border delineation, that can only be resolved through direct negotiations between the parties.