SAFE TECH Act

Bill: 115-hr-4561
Sponsor: full_name: Rep. Bilirakis, Gus M. [R-FL-12]
Introduced: 2017-12-06
Policy area: Transportation and Public Works
Subjects: Advanced technology and technological innovations

Aviation and airports

Business ethics

Congressional oversight

Europe

Firearms and explosives

Foreign and international corporations

Government studies and investigations

International organizations and cooperation

Performance measurement

Public contracts and procurement

Technology assessment

Terrorism

Transportation safety and security
Latest action: action_date: 2018-01-10
text: Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.

Summaries:
action_date: 2017-12-06
action_desc: Introduced in House
text: <p><b>Security Assessment Feasibility for Equipment Testing and Evaluation of Capabilities for our Homeland Act or the SAFE TECH Act</b></p> <p>This bill directs the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) to develop a program allowing a vendor to obtain performance testing of transportation security screening technology through a third party as an alternative to the TSA's regular testing process. The TSA must also develop a process for reciprocal recognition of security standards in coordination with the European Civil Aviation Conference. </p>

action_date: 2018-01-09
action_desc: Passed House amended
text: <p><b>Security Assessment Feasibility for Equipment Testing and Evaluation of Capabilities for our Homeland Act or the SAFE TECH Act</b></p> <p>(Sec. 3) This bill directs the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) to develop a program allowing a vendor to obtain performance testing of transportation security screening technology through a third party as an alternative to the TSA's regular testing process. </p> <p>(Sec. 4) The TSA must develop a process for reciprocal recognition of security standards in coordination with the European Civil Aviation Conference.</p> <p>(Sec. 5) The Government Accountability Office must report on the third-party testing program established by this bill.</p>

tv_txt: I 115th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 4561 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES December 6, 2017 Mr. Bilirakis (for himself, Mr. McCaul , Mr. Katko , and Mr. Dunn ) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Homeland Security A BILL To provide for third party testing of transportation security screening technology, and for other purposes.

1. Short title This Act may be cited as the Security Assessment Feasibility for Equipment Testing and Evaluation of Capabilities for our Homeland Act or the SAFE TECH Act . 2. Definitions In this Act: (1) Administration The term Administration means the Transportation Security Administration. (2) Administrator The term Administrator means the Administrator of the Transportation Security Administration. 3. Third party testing of security screening technology (a) In general Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Administrator, in consultation with the Under Secretary for Science and Technology of the Department of Homeland Security, shall develop a program to enable a vendor of transportation security screening technology to obtain testing, including as an alternative to the Administration’s testing process under paragraph (9) of section 114(f) of title 49, United States Code, by an appropriate third party, as determined by the Administrator, in consultation with the Under Secretary, of such technology before procurement or development of such technology. (b) Detection testing (1) In general The third party testing program authorized under subsection (a) shall include detection testing to evaluate the performance of a security screening technology relating to the probability of detection, the probability of false alarm, and other indicators that such technology is able to meet the Administration’s mission needs for detection of— (A) explosives; and (B) prohibited items. (2) Coordination with final processes To the extent practicable, and without compromising the integrity of the Administration’s testing process under paragraph (9) of section 114(f) of title 49, United States Code, or the Department of Homeland Security’s oversight of such testing process, or increasing costs to the Administration, the Administrator shall coordinate the third party detection testing under paragraph (1) with any associated subsequent final Government Department of Homeland Security testing. (3) International partnerships To the extent practicable and permissible under law, and in accordance with national security interests of the United States, the Administrator shall— (A) share with appropriate international partners detection testing information and standards; and (B) coordinate with such appropriate international partners to align such testing information and standards to maximize the capability to detect explosives and other threats. (c) Alternative testing factors Third party testing under subsection (a) may include as an alternative, at the discretion of the Administrator, the testing at the TSA Systems Integration Facility of the Administration, including testing for— (1) health and safety factors; (2) operator interface; (3) human factors; (4) environmental factors; (5) throughput; (6) reliability, maintainability, and availability factors; and (7) interoperability. (d) Testing framework (1) In general The Administrator, in consultation with the Under Secretary for Science and Technology of the Department of Homeland Security, shall— (A) establish a framework for the third party testing under this section to determine if the security screening technology that is the subject of such testing satisfies the Administration’s requirements before such technology may enter or re-enter, as applicable, operational testing at an airport or other transportation facility; and (B) use phased implementation to allow the Administration and the third party concerned to establish best practices. (e) Prioritization of third party testing The Administrator may prioritize, when appropriate, the field testing of security screening technology and equipment by third parties. 4. Reciprocal recognition of security standards (a) In general The Administrator, in coordination with the European Civil Aviation Conference, shall continue development of a validation process for the reciprocal recognition of security validation processes for recognition of security screening technologies or certification authorities for deployment. (b) Requirement The validation process under subsection (a) shall ensure that the certification process of each participating international security partner or recognized certification authority complies with Administration standards.

tv_txt: I 115th CONGRESS 2d Session H. R. 4561 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES AN ACT To provide for third party testing of transportation security screening technology, and for other purposes.

1. Short title This Act may be cited as the Security Assessment Feasibility for Equipment Testing and Evaluation of Capabilities for our Homeland Act or the SAFE TECH Act . 2. Definitions In this Act: (1) Administration The term Administration means the Transportation Security Administration. (2) Administrator The term Administrator means the Administrator of the Transportation Security Administration. 3. Third party testing of security screening technology (a) In general Not later than 1 year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Administrator, in consultation with the Under Secretary for Science and Technology of the Department of Homeland Security, shall develop a program to enable a vendor of transportation security screening technology to obtain testing, including as an alternative to the Administration’s testing process under paragraph (9) of section 114(f) of title 49, United States Code, by an appropriate third party, as determined by the Administrator, in consultation with the Under Secretary, of such technology before procurement or development of such technology. (b) Detection testing (1) In general The third party testing program authorized under subsection (a) shall include detection testing to evaluate the performance of a security screening technology relating to the probability of detection, the probability of false alarm, and other indicators that such technology is able to meet the Administration’s mission needs for detection of— (A) explosives; and (B) prohibited items. (2) Coordination with final processes To the extent practicable, and without compromising the integrity of the Administration’s testing process under paragraph (9) of section 114(f) of title 49, United States Code, or the Department of Homeland Security’s oversight of such testing process, or increasing costs to the Administration, the Administrator shall coordinate the third party detection testing under paragraph (1) with any associated subsequent final Department of Homeland Security testing. (3) International partnerships To the extent practicable and permissible under law, and in accordance with national security interests of the United States, the Administrator shall— (A) share with appropriate international partners detection testing information and standards; and (B) coordinate with such appropriate international partners to align such testing information and standards to maximize the capability to detect explosives and other threats. (c) Alternative testing factors Third party testing under subsection (a) may include as an alternative, at the discretion of the Administrator, the testing at the TSA Systems Integration Facility of the Administration, including testing for— (1) health and safety factors; (2) operator interface; (3) human factors; (4) environmental factors; (5) throughput; (6) reliability, maintainability, and availability factors; and (7) interoperability. (d) Testing framework The Administrator, in consultation with the Under Secretary for Science and Technology of the Department of Homeland Security, shall— (1) establish a framework for the third party testing under this section to determine if the security screening technology that is the subject of such testing satisfies the Administration’s requirements before such technology may enter or re-enter, as applicable, operational testing at an airport or other transportation facility; and (2) use phased implementation to allow the Administration and the third party concerned to establish best practices. (e) Prioritization of third party testing The Administrator may prioritize, when appropriate, the field testing of security screening technology and equipment by third parties. (f) Eligible entities (1) United States ownership An entity providing third party testing under the program developed pursuant to subsection (a) shall be owned and controlled by a citizen of the United States. (2) Waiver The Administrator may waive the requirement specified in paragraph (1) with respect to an entity that is a United States subsidiary of a parent company that has implemented a foreign ownership, control, or influence mitigation plan that has been approved by the Defense Security Service of the Department of Defense prior to seeking to engage in third party testing. The Administrator has complete discretion to reject any proposal from a company to provide testing under subsection (a) that requires a waiver under this paragraph. (3) Conflicts of interest The Administrator shall ensure, to the extent possible, that an entity providing third party testing under this section does not have a contractual, business, or other pecuniary interest (exclusive of any such testing) in— (A) the security screening technology subject to such testing; or the (B) vendor of such technology. 4. Reciprocal recognition of security standards (a) In general The Administrator, in coordination with the European Civil Aviation Conference, shall continue development of a validation process for the reciprocal recognition of security validation processes for recognition of security screening technologies or certification authorities for deployment. (b) Requirement The validation process under subsection (a) shall ensure that the certification process of each participating international security partner or recognized certification authority complies with Administration standards. 5. GAO review Not later than 2 years after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to the Committee on Homeland Security of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate a study on the third party testing program developed under this Act. Such study shall include a review of the following: (1) Any efficiencies or gains in effectiveness achieved in the Administration’s operations as a result of such program. (2) The degree to which the Administration conducts timely and regular oversight of entities engaged in such testing. (3) The effect of such program on the following: (A) The introduction of innovative detection technologies into security screening operations. (B) The availability of testing for technologies developed by small to medium sized businesses. (C) Any vulnerabilities associated with such program including with respect to the following: (i) National security. (ii) Conflicts of interest between entities carrying out such testing and entities with such technologies to be tested. (iii) Waste, fraud, and abuse.

Passed the House of Representatives January 9, 2018. Karen L. Haas, Clerk.

tv_txt: IIB 115th CONGRESS 2d Session H. R. 4561 IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES January 10, 2018 Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation AN ACT To provide for third party testing of transportation security screening technology, and for other purposes.

1. Short title This Act may be cited as the Security Assessment Feasibility for Equipment Testing and Evaluation of Capabilities for our Homeland Act or the SAFE TECH Act . 2. Definitions In this Act: (1) Administration The term Administration means the Transportation Security Administration. (2) Administrator The term Administrator means the Administrator of the Transportation Security Administration. 3. Third party testing of security screening technology (a) In general Not later than 1 year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Administrator, in consultation with the Under Secretary for Science and Technology of the Department of Homeland Security, shall develop a program to enable a vendor of transportation security screening technology to obtain testing, including as an alternative to the Administration’s testing process under paragraph (9) of section 114(f) of title 49, United States Code, by an appropriate third party, as determined by the Administrator, in consultation with the Under Secretary, of such technology before procurement or development of such technology. (b) Detection testing (1) In general The third party testing program authorized under subsection (a) shall include detection testing to evaluate the performance of a security screening technology relating to the probability of detection, the probability of false alarm, and other indicators that such technology is able to meet the Administration’s mission needs for detection of— (A) explosives; and (B) prohibited items. (2) Coordination with final processes To the extent practicable, and without compromising the integrity of the Administration’s testing process under paragraph (9) of section 114(f) of title 49, United States Code, or the Department of Homeland Security’s oversight of such testing process, or increasing costs to the Administration, the Administrator shall coordinate the third party detection testing under paragraph (1) with any associated subsequent final Department of Homeland Security testing. (3) International partnerships To the extent practicable and permissible under law, and in accordance with national security interests of the United States, the Administrator shall— (A) share with appropriate international partners detection testing information and standards; and (B) coordinate with such appropriate international partners to align such testing information and standards to maximize the capability to detect explosives and other threats. (c) Alternative testing factors Third party testing under subsection (a) may include as an alternative, at the discretion of the Administrator, the testing at the TSA Systems Integration Facility of the Administration, including testing for— (1) health and safety factors; (2) operator interface; (3) human factors; (4) environmental factors; (5) throughput; (6) reliability, maintainability, and availability factors; and (7) interoperability. (d) Testing framework The Administrator, in consultation with the Under Secretary for Science and Technology of the Department of Homeland Security, shall— (1) establish a framework for the third party testing under this section to determine if the security screening technology that is the subject of such testing satisfies the Administration’s requirements before such technology may enter or re-enter, as applicable, operational testing at an airport or other transportation facility; and (2) use phased implementation to allow the Administration and the third party concerned to establish best practices. (e) Prioritization of third party testing The Administrator may prioritize, when appropriate, the field testing of security screening technology and equipment by third parties. (f) Eligible entities (1) United States ownership An entity providing third party testing under the program developed pursuant to subsection (a) shall be owned and controlled by a citizen of the United States. (2) Waiver The Administrator may waive the requirement specified in paragraph (1) with respect to an entity that is a United States subsidiary of a parent company that has implemented a foreign ownership, control, or influence mitigation plan that has been approved by the Defense Security Service of the Department of Defense prior to seeking to engage in third party testing. The Administrator has complete discretion to reject any proposal from a company to provide testing under subsection (a) that requires a waiver under this paragraph. (3) Conflicts of interest The Administrator shall ensure, to the extent possible, that an entity providing third party testing under this section does not have a contractual, business, or other pecuniary interest (exclusive of any such testing) in— (A) the security screening technology subject to such testing; or the (B) vendor of such technology. 4. Reciprocal recognition of security standards (a) In general The Administrator, in coordination with the European Civil Aviation Conference, shall continue development of a validation process for the reciprocal recognition of security validation processes for recognition of security screening technologies or certification authorities for deployment. (b) Requirement The validation process under subsection (a) shall ensure that the certification process of each participating international security partner or recognized certification authority complies with Administration standards. 5. GAO review Not later than 2 years after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to the Committee on Homeland Security of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate a study on the third party testing program developed under this Act. Such study shall include a review of the following: (1) Any efficiencies or gains in effectiveness achieved in the Administration’s operations as a result of such program. (2) The degree to which the Administration conducts timely and regular oversight of entities engaged in such testing. (3) The effect of such program on the following: (A) The introduction of innovative detection technologies into security screening operations. (B) The availability of testing for technologies developed by small to medium sized businesses. (C) Any vulnerabilities associated with such program including with respect to the following: (i) National security. (ii) Conflicts of interest between entities carrying out such testing and entities with such technologies to be tested. (iii) Waste, fraud, and abuse.

Passed the House of Representatives January 9, 2018. Karen L. Haas, Clerk.

tv_txt: IB Union Calendar No. 371 115th CONGRESS 2d Session H. R. 4561 [Report No. 115–498] IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES December 6, 2017 Mr. Bilirakis (for himself, Mr. McCaul , Mr. Katko , and Mr. Dunn ) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Homeland Security January 9, 2018 Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printed Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert the part printed in italic For text of introduced bill, see copy of bill as introduced on December 6, 2017 A BILL To provide for third party testing of transportation security screening technology, and for other purposes.

1. Short title This Act may be cited as the Security Assessment Feasibility for Equipment Testing and Evaluation of Capabilities for our Homeland Act or the SAFE TECH Act . 2. Definitions In this Act: (1) Administration The term Administration means the Transportation Security Administration. (2) Administrator The term Administrator means the Administrator of the Transportation Security Administration. 3. Third party testing of security screening technology (a) In general Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Administrator, in consultation with the Under Secretary for Science and Technology of the Department of Homeland Security, shall develop a program to enable a vendor of transportation security screening technology to obtain testing, including as an alternative to the Administration’s testing process under paragraph (9) of section 114(f) of title 49, United States Code, by an appropriate third party, as determined by the Administrator, in consultation with the Under Secretary, of such technology before procurement or development of such technology. (b) Detection testing (1) In general The third party testing program authorized under subsection (a) shall include detection testing to evaluate the performance of a security screening technology relating to the probability of detection, the probability of false alarm, and other indicators that such technology is able to meet the Administration’s mission needs for detection of— (A) explosives; and (B) prohibited items. (2) Coordination with final processes To the extent practicable, and without compromising the integrity of the Administration’s testing process under paragraph (9) of section 114(f) of title 49, United States Code, or the Department of Homeland Security’s oversight of such testing process, or increasing costs to the Administration, the Administrator shall coordinate the third party detection testing under paragraph (1) with any associated subsequent final Department of Homeland Security testing. (3) International partnerships To the extent practicable and permissible under law, and in accordance with national security interests of the United States, the Administrator shall— (A) share with appropriate international partners detection testing information and standards; and (B) coordinate with such appropriate international partners to align such testing information and standards to maximize the capability to detect explosives and other threats. (c) Alternative testing factors Third party testing under subsection (a) may include as an alternative, at the discretion of the Administrator, the testing at the TSA Systems Integration Facility of the Administration, including testing for— (1) health and safety factors; (2) operator interface; (3) human factors; (4) environmental factors; (5) throughput; (6) reliability, maintainability, and availability factors; and (7) interoperability. (d) Testing framework The Administrator, in consultation with the Under Secretary for Science and Technology of the Department of Homeland Security, shall— (1) establish a framework for the third party testing under this section to determine if the security screening technology that is the subject of such testing satisfies the Administration’s requirements before such technology may enter or re-enter, as applicable, operational testing at an airport or other transportation facility; and (2) use phased implementation to allow the Administration and the third party concerned to establish best practices. (e) Prioritization of third party testing The Administrator may prioritize, when appropriate, the field testing of security screening technology and equipment by third parties. (f) Eligible entities (1) United States ownership An entity providing third party testing under the program developed pursuant to subsection (a) shall be owned and controlled by a citizen of the United States. (2) Waiver The Administrator may waive the requirement specified in paragraph (1) with respect to an entity that is a United States subsidiary of a parent company that has implemented a foreign ownership, control, or influence mitigation plan that has been approved by the Defense Security Service of the Department of Defense prior to seeking to engage in third party testing. The Administrator has complete discretion to reject any proposal from a company to provide testing under subsection (a) that requires a waiver under this paragraph. (3) Conflicts of interest The Administrator shall ensure, to the extent possible, that an entity providing third party testing under this section does not have a contractual, business, or other pecuniary interest (exclusive of any such testing) in— (A) the security screening technology subject to such testing; or the (B) vendor of such technology. 4. Reciprocal recognition of security standards (a) In general The Administrator, in coordination with the European Civil Aviation Conference, shall continue development of a validation process for the reciprocal recognition of security validation processes for recognition of security screening technologies or certification authorities for deployment. (b) Requirement The validation process under subsection (a) shall ensure that the certification process of each participating international security partner or recognized certification authority complies with Administration standards. 5. GAO review Not later than two years after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to the Committee on Homeland Security of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate a study on the third party testing program developed under this Act. Such study shall include a review of the following: (1) Any efficiencies or gains in effectiveness achieved in the Administration’s operations as a result of such program. (2) The degree to which the Administration conducts timely and regular oversight of entities engaged in such testing. (3) The effect of such program on the following: (A) The introduction of innovative detection technologies into security screening operations. (B) The availability of testing for technologies developed by small to medium sized businesses. (C) Any vulnerabilities associated with such program including with respect to the following: (i) National security. (ii) Conflicts of interest between entities carrying out such testing and entities with such technologies to be tested. (iii) Waste, fraud and abuse.

January 9, 2018 Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printed