Supreme Court Ethics Act of 2017

Bill: 115-hr-1960
Sponsor: full_name: Rep. Slaughter, Louise McIntosh [D-NY-25]
Introduced: 2017-04-05
Policy area: Law
Subjects: Government ethics and transparency, public corruption

Judges

Supreme Court
Latest action: action_date: 2018-05-15
text: ASSUMING FIRST SPONSORSHIP - Mr. Johnson (GA) asked unanimous consent that he may hereafter be considered as the first sponsor of H.R. 1960, a bill originally introduced by Representative Slaughter of New York, for the purpose of adding cosponsors and requesting reprintings under clause 7 of rule XII. Agreed to without objection.

Summaries:
action_date: 2017-04-05
action_desc: Introduced in House
text: <p><strong>Supreme Court Ethics Act of</strong> <b>2017</b></p> <p>The bill requires the Supreme Court to promulgate a code of ethics for the Justices of the Supreme Court that shall include the five canons of the Code of Conduct for United States Judges adopted by the Judicial Conference of the United States, with any amendments or modifications that the Supreme Court determines appropriate.</p>

tv_txt: I 115th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 1960 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES April 5, 2017 Ms. Slaughter (for herself, Mr. Brendan F. Boyle of Pennsylvania , Ms. Brownley of California , Mr. Cohen , Mr. Connolly , Mr. Costa , Mr. Crowley , Mr. Cummings , Mr. Hastings , Mr. Huffman , Ms. Kelly of Illinois , Mr. Kildee , Mr. Langevin , Mr. Lipinski , Ms. Michelle Lujan Grisham of New Mexico , Ms. McCollum , Mrs. Napolitano , Mr. Pallone , Mr. Pascrell , Mr. Quigley , Mr. Sarbanes , Mr. Scott of Virginia , Mr. Swalwell of California , Ms. Tsongas , Ms. Velázquez , and Mr. Yarmuth ) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary A BILL To require the Supreme Court of the United States to promulgate a code of ethics.

1. Short title This Act may be cited as the Supreme Court Ethics Act of 2017 . 2. Findings; purpose (a) Findings Congress finds the following: (1) In Caperton v. A.T. Massey Coal Co., 556 U.S. 868 (2009), Justice Kennedy, writing for the Court, stated that [judicial codes of conduct] serve to maintain the integrity of the judiciary and the rule of law . (2) The Code of Conduct for United States Judges (referred to in this subsection as the Code ) applies to all Federal judges except Justices of the Supreme Court. Justices of the Supreme Court are not formally bound by any code of conduct. Chief Justice John Roberts noted in the 2011 Year-End Report on the Federal Judiciary that while the Judicial Conference, which promulgates the Code, does not have authority to bind the Supreme Court, the Code is nonetheless the starting point and a key source of guidance for the Justices as well as their lower court colleagues . (3) Congress has the authority to regulate the administration of the Supreme Court of the United States. For example, Congress sets the number of justices who sit on the Supreme Court and how many constitute a quorum, the term of the court, meaning the dates the court will be in session, and the salaries of the Justices. Additionally, the Ethics in Government Act of 1978 (5 U.S.C. App.) requires most high-level Federal officials in all 3 branches, including the President, Vice President, cabinet members, Justices of the Supreme Court, and Members of Congress, to file annual financial disclosure statements. (b) Purpose The purpose of this Act is to apply a code of ethics to Justices who sit on the Supreme Court of the United States, being mindful of their preeminence in the Federal judiciary. 3. Supreme Court code of ethics The Supreme Court of the United States shall, not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, promulgate a code of ethics for the Justices of the Supreme Court that shall include the 5 canons of the Code of Conduct for United States Judges adopted by the Judicial Conference of the United States, with any amendments or modifications thereto that the Supreme Court determines appropriate.