Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the Office of Technology Assessment should be reestablished.

Bill: 115-hres-849
Sponsor: full_name: Rep. Foster, Bill [D-IL-11]
Introduced: 2018-04-26
Policy area: Congress
Subjects: Congressional operations and organization

Technology assessment
Latest action: action_date: 2018-04-26
text: Referred to the House Committee on House Administration.

Summaries:
action_date: 2018-04-26
action_desc: Introduced in House
text: <p>Expresses the sense of the House of Representatives that: (1) the legislative process would greatly benefit from once again having an office dedicated to giving nonpartisan, technical advice to Congress; (2) the Office of Technology Assessment (OTA) represents a cost-effective improvement to the governance of the United States; and (3) funding should be restored for the OTA.</p>

tv_txt: IV 115th CONGRESS 2d Session H. RES. 849 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES April 26, 2018 Mr. Foster (for himself, Mr. Takano , Ms. Judy Chu of California , Ms. Clarke of New York , Ms. DeGette , Mr. Delaney , Ms. DelBene , Ms. Esty of Connecticut , Ms. Hanabusa , Mr. Johnson of Georgia , Ms. Kaptur , Mr. Lewis of Georgia , Mr. Ted Lieu of California , Mr. McGovern , Mr. McNerney , Ms. Norton , Mr. Rush , Ms. Schakowsky , Mr. Schiff , Mrs. Watson Coleman , and Ms. Lofgren ) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on House Administration RESOLUTION Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the Office of Technology Assessment should be reestablished.

Whereas the Office of Technology Assessment (hereinafter referred to as OTA ) was created in 1972 to provide Members of Congress and congressional committees with objective analysis of increasingly complex scientific and technical issues faced by our country; Whereas for over 20 years and 11 sessions of Congress, the OTA produced trustworthy, nonpartisan technical reports on issues as far ranging as nuclear arms control, electronic health records, and oil and shale technologies; Whereas the expertise provided by the OTA saved taxpayers billions of dollars by identifying cost-effective areas for future investment and avoiding wasting money on technologies and policies that did not and could not work; Whereas the OTA contributed to the security and economic growth of our Nation by providing timely and forward looking analysis of technological threats and opportunities; Whereas it is frequently necessary for Members of Congress to make informed policy decisions about rapidly changing technologies that are often outside their technical areas of expertise; Whereas in the 20 years since Congress has suspended appropriations for the OTA, the United States has missed significant opportunities for reallocating Federal spending to better align with current and future technological reality; and Whereas 90 organizations came together to call for the OTA to be funded once again by Congress: Now, therefore, be it

That it is the sense of the House of Representatives that— (1) the legislative process would greatly benefit from once again having an office dedicated to giving nonpartisan, technical advice to Congress; (2) the Office of Technology Assessment represents a cost-effective improvement to the governance of the United States; and (3) funding should be restored for the Office of Technology Assessment.