No Unconstitutional Strike against North Korea Act

Bill: 115-hr-4140
Sponsor: full_name: Rep. Conyers, John, Jr. [D-MI-13]
Introduced: 2017-10-26
Policy area: International Affairs
Subjects: Alliances

Appropriations

Arms control and nonproliferation

Asia

Congressional oversight

Defense spending

Department of Defense

Diplomacy, foreign officials, Americans abroad

Executive agency funding and structure

Japan

Military operations and strategy

Military personnel and dependents

North Korea

Nuclear weapons

Presidents and presidential powers, Vice Presidents

South Korea

War and emergency powers
Latest action: action_date: 2017-10-26
text: Referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and in addition to the Committee on Armed Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

Summaries:
action_date: 2017-10-26
action_desc: Introduced in House
text: <p><b>No Unconstitutional Strike against North Korea Act</b></p> <p>This bill expresses the sense of Congress that: (1) a conflict on the Korean peninsula would have catastrophic consequences; (2) actions and statements that increase tensions between the United States and North Korea should be avoided; and (3) the President should engage in talks with North Korea to reduce tensions and improve communication, initiate negotiations to achieve a diplomatic agreement to halt and eventually reverse North Korea's nuclear pursuits, and move toward denuclearization and a permanent peace in the Korean peninsula.</p> <p>Funds available to the Department of Defense or to any other federal department or agency may not be used to launch a military strike against North Korea or otherwise introduce U.S. Armed Forces into hostilities in North Korea before the earlier of: (1) the date on which Congress declares war on North Korea, or (2) the date of an authorization that meets the requirements of the War Powers Resolution and that is enacted after the enactment of this bill. Such prohibition shall not apply to military force used to: (1) repel a sudden attack on the United States, its territories or possessions, its Armed Forces, or its allies; or (2) rescue or remove U. S. personnel.</p>

tv_txt: I 115th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 4140 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES October 26, 2017 Mr. Conyers (for himself, Mr. Massie , Mr. Khanna , Mr. Jones , Mr. Pocan , Mr. McGovern , Ms. Lee , Mr. Ted Lieu of California , Ms. Norton , Mr. Doggett , Mr. Nolan , Mr. Welch , Mr. Ellison , Mr. Pallone , Ms. Slaughter , Mr. Beyer , Mr. Nadler , Mr. Grijalva , Ms. Hanabusa , Mr. Raskin , Ms. Schakowsky , Ms. Jayapal , Mr. Cohen , Ms. Jackson Lee , Ms. Moore , Mr. Evans , Mr. Rush , Mr. Blumenauer , Mr. Johnson of Georgia , Ms. Gabbard , Mr. Gutiérrez , Ms. Pingree , Ms. Lofgren , Ms. Clarke of New York , Mr. Cleaver , Mr. Danny K. Davis of Illinois , Mr. Payne , Mrs. Watson Coleman , Ms. Wilson of Florida , Mr. Capuano , Mr. Cicilline , Mr. Garamendi , Ms. Barragán , Ms. McCollum , Mr. DeSaulnier , Mrs. Beatty , Mr. Lewis of Georgia , Ms. Clark of Massachusetts , Ms. Bonamici , Mrs. Napolitano , Ms. Judy Chu of California , Mr. Huffman , Ms. Velázquez , Mr. DeFazio , Mr. Sherman , Mr. Serrano , Ms. Tsongas , Mr. Carbajal , Ms. Maxine Waters of California , Ms. Eshoo , and Ms. DeLauro ) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs , and in addition to the Committee on Armed Services , for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned A BILL To prohibit the introduction of the Armed Forces into hostilities in North Korea without a declaration of war or explicit statutory authorization, and for other purposes.

1. Short title This Act may be cited as the No Unconstitutional Strike against North Korea Act . 2. Findings Congress finds the following: (1) The President is currently prohibited from initiating a war or launching a first strike without congressional approval under the Constitution and Federal law. (2) The Constitution, in article I, section 8, grants Congress the sole power to declare war. (3) George Washington wrote that The constitution vests the power of declaring war in Congress; therefore no offensive expedition of importance can be undertaken until after they shall have deliberated upon the subject and authorized such a measure (Letter from George Washington to William Moultrie, August 28, 1793). (4) Alexander Hamilton wrote that The Congress shall have the power to declare war ; the plain meaning of which is, that it is the peculiar and exclusive duty of Congress, when the nation is at peace, to change that state into a state of war (Hamilton Papers, Examination Number I, December 17, 1801). (5) James Madison wrote that The power to declare war, including the power of judging the causes of war, is fully and exclusively vested in the legislature … the executive has no right, in any case, to decide the question, whether there is or is not cause for declaring war (Madison Papers, Helvidius , Number 4, September 14, 1793). (6) Section 2(c) of the War Powers Resolution ( Public Law 93–148 ; 50 U.S.C. 1541 ) states that the constitutional powers of the President as Commander-in-Chief to introduce United States Armed Forces into hostilities, or into situations where imminent involvement in hostilities is clearly indicated by the circumstances, are exercised only pursuant to (1) a declaration of war, (2) specific statutory authorization, or (3) a national emergency created by attack upon the United States, its territories or possessions, or its armed forces . (7) The American people, America’s allies in Asia, and the entire world have been deeply troubled by escalating tensions on the Korean peninsula. (8) Recent polling demonstrates that more than two-thirds of the American people believe that the United States should attack North Korea only if North Korea attacks first. (9) The United States has approximately 28,500 servicemembers stationed in South Korea, who would be placed in grave danger if an active military conflict were to erupt. (10) On August 14, 2017, Chairman of the U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff, Marine Corps General Joseph Dunford stated that the United States military’s priority is to support our government’s efforts to achieve the denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula through diplomatic and economic pressure . (11) On August 10, 2017, Defense Secretary James Mattis stated that armed conflict with North Korea would be catastrophic . 3. Sense of Congress in support of a diplomatic resolution to growing tensions with North Korea It is the sense of Congress that— (1) a conflict on the Korean peninsula would have catastrophic consequences for— (A) the American people; (B) members of the United States Armed Forces stationed in the region; (C) United States interests; (D) United States allies South Korea and Japan; (E) the long-suffering people of North Korea; and (F) global peace and security more broadly; (2) actions and statements that increase tensions and could lead to miscalculation should be avoided; and (3) the President, in coordination with United States allies, should explore and pursue every feasible opportunity to— (A) engage in talks with North Korea on concrete steps to reduce tensions and improve communication; (B) initiate negotiations designed to achieve a diplomatic agreement to halt and eventually reverse North Korea’s nuclear and missile pursuits; and (C) move toward denuclearization and a permanent peace in the Korean peninsula. 4. Prohibition on unconstitutional military strikes against North Korea (a) In general None of the funds appropriated or otherwise made available to the Department of Defense or to any other Federal department or agency may be used to launch a military strike against North Korea or otherwise introduce the Armed Forces into hostilities in North Korea before the earlier of— (1) the date on which Congress declares war on North Korea; or (2) the date of the enactment of an authorization described in subsection (b). (b) Authorization of military strikes An authorization described in this subsection is an authorization that meets the requirements of the War Powers Resolution ( 50 U.S.C. 1541 et seq.) and that is enacted after the date of the enactment of this Act. (c) Exceptions The prohibition under subsection (a) shall not apply with respect to the introduction of the Armed Forces into hostilities— (1) to repel a sudden attack on the United States, its territories or possessions, or its Armed Forces, or its allies; or (2) to rescue or remove United States personnel. (d) Rule of construction Nothing in this section may be construed to affect or alter the requirements of the War Powers Resolution ( 50 U.S.C. 1541 et seq.) or to relieve the executive branch of the restrictions or reporting requirements therein.