Improving Department of State Oversight Act of 2015

Bill: 114-s-1527
Sponsor: full_name: Sen. Perdue, David [R-GA]
Introduced: 2015-06-08
Policy area: International Affairs
Subjects: Computers and information technology

Congressional oversight

Criminal investigation, prosecution, interrogation

Department of State

Fraud offenses and financial crimes

Government employee pay, benefits, personnel management

Government ethics and transparency, public corruption

Government studies and investigations

Iraq

Middle East
Latest action: action_date: 2015-06-08
text: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.

Summaries:
action_date: 2015-06-08
action_desc: Introduced in Senate
text: <p><strong>Improving Department of State Oversight Act of 2015</strong></p> <p>This bill grants competitive status for appointment to a position in the competitive service for which the employee is qualified to any employee of the Special Inspector General for Iraq Reconstruction (SIGRI) who was not terminated for cause, and who completes at least 12 months of service at any time before the termination of the SIGRI on October 5, 2013.</p> <p>The Secretary of State shall certify to Congress that the Department of State has made reasonable efforts to ensure the integrity and independence of the Office of the Inspector General Information Technology systems.</p> <p>Each State Department entity under the Foreign Service Act of 1980 shall report within five business days to the Inspector General (IG) any allegations of: </p> <ul> <li>program waste, fraud, or abuse; </li> <li>criminal or serious misconduct on the part of a Department employee at the FS-1, GS-15, GM-15 level or higher; </li> <li>criminal misconduct on the part of any Department employee; and </li> <li>serious, noncriminal misconduct on the part of any individual who is authorized to carry a weapon, make arrests, or conduct searches (such as conduct that would constitute perjury or material dishonesty, warrant suspension as discipline for a first offense, or result in loss of law enforcement authority). </li> </ul>  <p>No State Department entity with concurrent jurisdiction over such matters, including the Bureau of Diplomatic Security, may initiate an investigation without first reporting the allegations to the IG. </p> <p>A State Department entity that initiates an investigation of such a matter must fully cooperate with the IG, unless the IG authorizes an exception.</p>

tv_txt: II 114th CONGRESS 1st Session S. 1527 IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES June 8, 2015 Mr. Perdue (for himself and Mr. Kaine ) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations A BILL To enable more responsible and efficient spending on Department of State activities and foreign operations.

1. Short title This Act may be cited at the Improving Department of State Oversight Act of 2015 . 2. Competitive hiring status for former employees of the Special Inspector General for Iraq Reconstruction Notwithstanding any other provision of law, any employee of the Special Inspector General for Iraq Reconstruction who completes at least 12 months of service at any time prior to the date of the termination of the Special Inspector General for Iraq Reconstruction, October 5, 2013, and was not terminated for cause shall acquire competitive status for appointment to any position in the competitive service for which the employee possesses the required qualifications. 3. Assurance of independence of IT systems (a) In general The Secretary of State, with the concurrence of the Inspector General of the Department of State, shall certify to the appropriate congressional committees that the Department has made reasonable efforts to ensure the integrity and independence of the Office of the Inspector General Information Technology systems. (b) Appropriate congressional committees defined In this section, the term appropriate congressional committees means— (1) the Committee on Foreign Relations and the Committee on Appropriations of the Senate; and (2) the Committee on Foreign Affairs and the Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives. 4. Protecting the integrity of internal investigations Section 209(c)(5) of the Foreign Service Act of 1980 ( 22 U.S.C. 3929(c)(5) ) is amended by inserting at the end the following new subparagraph: (C) Required reporting of allegations and investigations and inspector general authority (i) In general Each bureau, post or other office (in this subparagraph, an entity ) of the Department of State shall, within five business days, report to the Inspector General any allegations of— (I) waste, fraud, or abuse in a Department program or operation; (II) criminal or serious misconduct on the part of a Department employee at the FS–1, GS–15, GM–15 level or higher; (III) criminal misconduct on the part of any Department employee; and (IV) serious, noncriminal misconduct on the part of any individual who is authorized to carry a weapon, make arrests, or conduct searches, such as conduct that, if proved, would constitute perjury or material dishonesty, warrant suspension as discipline for a first offense, or result in loss of law enforcement authority. (ii) Inspector General authority The Inspector General may, pursuant to existing authority, investigate matters covered by clause (i). (iii) Limitation on investigations outside of Office of Inspector General No entity in the Department of State with concurrent jurisdiction over matters covered by clause (i), including the Bureau of Diplomatic Security, may initiate an investigation of such matter unless it has first reported the allegations to the Inspector General as required by clause (i), except as provided in clauses (v) and (vi). (iv) Cooperation If an entity in the Department of State initiates an investigation of a matter covered in clause (i) the entity must, except as provided in clause (v), fully cooperate with the Inspector General, including— (I) by providing to the Inspector General all data and records obtained in connection with its investigation upon request of the Inspector General; (II) by coordinating, at the request of the Inspector General, such entity’s investigation with the Inspector General; and (III) by providing to the Inspector General requested support in aid of the Inspector General’s oversight and investigative responsibilities. (v) Exceptions The Inspector General may prescribe general rules under which any requirement of clause (iii) or clause (iv) may be dispensed with. (vi) Exigent circumstances Compliance with clauses (i), (iii), and (iv) of this subparagraph may be dispensed with by an entity of the Department of State if complying with them in an exigent circumstance would pose an imminent threat to human life, health or safety, or result in the irretrievable loss or destruction of critical evidence or witness testimony, in which case a report of the allegation shall be made not later than 48 hours after an entity begins an investigation under the authority of this clause and cooperation required under clause (iv) shall commence not later than 48 hours after the relevant exigent circumstance has ended. (vii) Rule of construction Nothing in this subparagraph may be interpreted to affect any duty or authority of the Inspector General under any provision of law, including the Inspector General’s duties or authorities under the Inspector General Act. . 5. Report on Inspector General inspection and auditing of Foreign Service posts and bureaus and operating units Department of State (a) In general Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of State shall submit a report to Congress on the requirement under section 209(a)(1) of the Foreign Service Act of 1980 ( 22 U.S.C. 3929(a)(1) ) that the Inspector General of the Department of State inspect and audit, at least every 5 years, the administration of activities and operations of each Foreign Service post and each bureau and other operating unit of the Department of State. (b) Consideration of Multi-Tier system The report required under subsection (a) shall assess the advisability and feasibility of implementing a multi-tier system for inspecting Foreign Service posts featuring more (or less) frequent inspections and audits of posts based on risk, including security risk, as may be determined by the Inspector General. (c) Composition The report required under subsection (a) shall include separate portions prepared by the Inspector General of the Department of State, and the Comptroller General of the United States, respectively.