What Works to Move Welfare Recipients into Jobs Act

Bill: 114-hr-5169
Sponsor: full_name: Rep. Buchanan, Vern [R-FL-16]
Introduced: 2016-05-06
Policy area: Social Welfare
Subjects: Child safety and welfare

Employment and training programs

Government information and archives

Marriage and family status

Performance measurement

Poverty and welfare assistance

Research administration and funding

State and local government operations

Teenage pregnancy
Latest action: action_date: 2016-06-10
text: Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 478.

Summaries:
action_date: 2016-05-06
action_desc: Introduced in House
text: <p><b>What Works to Move Welfare Recipients into Jobs Act</b></p> <p> This bill amends part A (Temporary Assistance for Needy Families) (TANF) of title VI of the Social Security Act to revise requirements for research by the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) on the benefits, effects, and costs of operating different state programs funded under part A and any other state program funded with qualified state expenditures.</p> <p>Such research shall focus on the effect of these programs as well as of healthy marriage promotion and responsible fatherhood grants on employment, self-sufficiency, child well-being, unmarried births, marriage, poverty, economic mobility, and other factors determined by HHS.</p>  <p>At the request of a state, HHS may provide assistance to help the state develop and evaluate policies to achieve specified goals.</p> <p>A state's contribution to the cost of a state-initiated evaluation of its program, from non-federal sources, shall increase from at least 10% to at least 25% of the cost of the proposed evaluation. </p> <p>The Bureau of the Census shall implement or enhance household surveys of program participation to allow for assessment of the outcomes of continued welfare reform on the economic and child well-being of low-income families with children, including those who received assistance or services from a state program funded under TANF or any other state program funded with qualified state expenditures.</p> <p>Research and evaluation designed to determine the effects of a program or policy (other than Census Bureau research) shall use experimental designs using random assignment or other reliable, evidence-based research methodologies that allow for the strongest possible casual inferences when random assignment is not feasible.<p>HHS shall develop a database of the projects that used a proven or a promising approach in moving welfare recipients into work, which shall be called the What Works Clearinghouse of Proven and Promising Projects to Move Welfare Recipients into Work.</p>

action_date: 2016-06-10
action_desc: Reported to House amended, Part I
text: <p><b>What Works to Move Welfare Recipients into Jobs Act</b></p> <p>This bill amends part A (Temporary Assistance for Needy Families) (TANF) of title VI of the Social Security Act to revise requirements for research by the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) on the benefits, effects, and costs of operating different state programs funded under part A and any other state program funded with qualified state expenditures.</p> <p>(Sec. 2) Such research shall focus on the effect of these programs as well as of healthy marriage promotion and responsible fatherhood grants on employment, self-sufficiency, child well-being, unmarried births, marriage, poverty, economic mobility, and other factors determined by HHS.</p> <p>A state's contribution to the cost of a state-initiated evaluation of its program, from non-federal sources, shall increase from at least 10% to at least 25% of the cost of the proposed evaluation. </p> <p>The Bureau of the Census shall implement or enhance household surveys of program participation to allow for assessment of the outcomes of continued welfare reform on the economic and child well-being of low-income families with children, including those who received assistance or services from a state program funded under TANF or any other state program funded with qualified state expenditures.</p> <p>Research and evaluation designed to determine the effects of a program or policy (other than Census Bureau research) shall use experimental designs using random assignment or other reliable, evidence-based research methodologies that allow for the strongest possible casual inferences when random assignment is not feasible. <p>HHS shall develop a database of the projects that used a proven or a promising approach in moving welfare recipients into work, which shall be called the What Works Clearinghouse of Proven and Promising Projects to Move Welfare Recipients into Work.</p>

tv_txt: I 114th CONGRESS 2d Session H. R. 5169 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES May 6, 2016 Mr. Buchanan introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means , and in addition to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform , for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned A BILL To strengthen welfare research and evaluation, and for other purposes.

1. Short title This Act may be cited as the What Works to Move Welfare Recipients into Jobs Act . 2. Research and evaluation (a) In general Section 413 of the Social Security Act ( 42 U.S.C. 613 ) is amended to read as follows: 413. Evaluation of Temporary Assistance for Needy Families and related programs (a) Evaluation of the impacts of TANF The Secretary shall conduct research on the effect of State programs funded under this part and any other State program funded with qualified State expenditures (as defined in section 409(a)(7)(B)(i)) on employment, self-sufficiency, child well-being, unmarried births, marriage, poverty, economic mobility, and other factors as determined by the Secretary. (b) Evaluation of grants To improve child well-Being by promoting healthy marriage and responsible fatherhood The Secretary shall conduct research to determine the effects of the grants made under section 403(a)(2) on child well-being, marriage, family stability, economic mobility, poverty, and other factors as determined by the Secretary. (c) Partnership with States To improve performance At the request of a State, the Secretary may provide assistance to help the State develop and evaluate policies to achieve the goals specified in section 401(a), including by providing funds for training and technical assistance. (d) Dissemination of information The Secretary shall, in consultation with States receiving funds provided under this part, develop methods of disseminating information on any research, evaluation, or study conducted under this section, including facilitating the sharing of information and best practices among States and localities. (e) State-Initiated evaluations A State shall be eligible to receive funding to evaluate the State program funded under this part or any other State program funded with qualified State expenditures (as defined in section 409(a)(7)(B)(i)) if— (1) the State submits to the Secretary a description of the proposed evaluation; (2) the Secretary determines that the design and approach of the proposed evaluation is rigorous and is likely to yield information that is credible and will be useful to other States; and (3) unless waived by the Secretary, the State contributes to the cost of the evaluation, from non-Federal sources, an amount equal to at least 25 percent of the cost of the proposed evaluation. (f) Census Bureau research (1) The Bureau of the Census shall implement or enhance household surveys of program participation, in consultation with the Secretary and the Burueau of Labor Statistics and made available to interested parties, to allow for the assessment of the outcomes of continued welfare reform on the economic and child well-being of low-income families with children, including those who received assistance or services from a State program funded under this part or any other State program funded with qualified State expenditures (as defined in section 409(a)(7)(B)(i)). The content of the survey should include such information as may be necessary to examine the issues of unmarried childbearing, marriage, welfare dependency and compliance with work requirements, the beginning and ending of spells of assistance, work, earnings and employment stability, and the well-being of children. (2) To carry out the activities specified in paragraph (1), the Bureau of the Census, the Secretary, and the Bureau of Labor Statistics shall consider ways to improve the surveys and data derived from the surveys to— (A) address underreporting of the receipt of means-tested benefits and tax benefits for low-income individuals and families; (B) increase understanding of poverty spells and long-term poverty, including by facilitating the matching of information to better understand intergenerational poverty; (C) generate a better geographical understanding of poverty such as through State-based estimates and measures of neighborhood poverty; (D) increase understanding of the effects of means-tested benefits and tax benefits on the earnings of low-income families; and (E) improve how poverty and economic well-being are measured, including through the use of consumption measures. (g) Research and evaluation conducted under this section Research and evaluation conducted under this section designed to determine the effects of a program or policy (other than research conducted under subsection (f)) shall use experimental designs using random assignment or other reliable, evidence-based research methodologies that allow for the strongest possible causal inferences when random assignment is not feasible. (h) Development of what works clearinghouse of proven and promising approaches to move welfare recipients into work (1) In general The Secretary, in consultation with the Secretary of Labor, shall develop a database (which shall be referred to as the What Works Clearinghouse of Proven and Promising Projects to Move Welfare Recipients into Work ) of the projects that used a proven approach or a promising approach in moving welfare recipients into work, based on independent, rigorous evaluations of the projects. The database shall include a separate listing of projects that used a developmental approach in delivering services and a further separate listing of the projects with no or negative effects. The Secretary shall add to the What Works Clearinghouse of Proven and Promising Projects to Move Welfare Recipients into Work data about the projects that, based on an independent, well-conducted experimental evaluation of a program or project, using random assignment or other research methodologies that allow for the strongest possible causal inferences, have shown they are proven, promising, developmental, or ineffective approaches. (2) Criteria for evidence of effectiveness of approach The Secretary, in consultation with the Secretary of Labor and organizations with experience in evaluating research on the effectiveness of various approaches in delivering services to move welfare recipients into work, shall— (A) establish criteria for evidence of effectiveness; and (B) ensure that the process for establishing the criteria— (i) is transparent; (ii) is consistent across agencies; (iii) provides opportunity for public comment; and (iv) takes into account efforts of Federal agencies to identify and publicize effective interventions, including efforts at the Department of Health and Human Services, the Department of Education, and the Department of Justice. (3) Definitions In this subsection: (A) Approach The term approach means a process, product, strategy, or practice that is— (i) research-based, based on the results of 1 or more empirical studies, and linked to program-determined outcomes; and (ii) evaluated using rigorous research designs. (B) Proven approach The term proven approach means an approach that— (i) meets the requirements of a promising approach; and (ii) has demonstrated significant positive outcomes at more than 1 site in terms of increasing work and earnings of participants, reducing poverty and dependence, or strengthening families. (C) Promising approach The term promising approach means an approach— (i) that meets the requirements of subparagraph (D)(i); (ii) that has been evaluated using well-designed and rigorous randomized controlled or quasi-experimental research designs; (iii) that has demonstrated significant positive outcomes at only 1 site in terms of increasing work and earnings of participants, reducing poverty and dependence, or strengthening families; and (iv) under which the benefits of the positive outcomes have exceeded the costs of achieving the outcomes. (D) Developmental approach The term developmental approach means an approach that— (i) is research-based, grounded in relevant empirically based knowledge, and linked to program-determined outcomes; (ii) is evaluated using rigorous research designs; and (iii) has yet to demonstrate a significant positive outcome in terms of increasing work and earnings of participants in a cost-effective way. (i) Appropriation (1) In general Of the amount appropriated by section 403(a)(1) for each fiscal year, 0.33 percent shall be available for research and evaluation under this section. (2) Allocation Of the amount made available under paragraph (1) for each fiscal year, the Secretary shall make available $10,000,000 plus such additional amount as the Secretary deems necessary and appropriate, to carry out subsection (f). . (b) Conforming amendment Section 403(a)(1)(B) of such Act ( 42 U.S.C. 603(a)(1)(B) ) is amended by inserting , reduced by the percentage specified in section 413(i) with respect to the fiscal year, before as the amount . 3. Effective date The amendments made by this Act shall take effect on October 1, 2016.

tv_txt: IB Union Calendar No. 478 114th CONGRESS 2d Session H. R. 5169 [Report No. 114–615, Part I] IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES May 6, 2016 Mr. Buchanan introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means , and in addition to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform , for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned June 10, 2016 Reported from the Committee on Ways and Means with an amendment Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert the part printed in italic June 10, 2016 The Committee on Oversight and Government Reform discharged; committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union and ordered to be printed For text of introduced bill, see copy of bill as introduced on May 6, 2016 A BILL To strengthen welfare research and evaluation, and for other purposes.

1. Short title This Act may be cited as the What Works to Move Welfare Recipients into Jobs Act . 2. Strengthening welfare research and evaluation and development of a What Works Clearinghouse Section 413 of the Social Security Act ( 42 U.S.C. 613 ) is amended to read as follows: 413. Evaluation of Temporary Assistance for Needy Families and related programs (a) Evaluation of the impacts of TANF The Secretary shall conduct research on the effect of State programs funded under this part and any other State program funded with qualified State expenditures (as defined in section 409(a)(7)(B)(i)) on employment, self-sufficiency, child well-being, unmarried births, marriage, poverty, economic mobility, and other factors as determined by the Secretary. (b) Evaluation of grants to improve child well-being by promoting healthy marriage and responsible fatherhood The Secretary shall conduct research to determine the effects of the grants made under section 403(a)(2) on child well-being, marriage, family stability, economic mobility, poverty, and other factors as determined by the Secretary. (c) Dissemination of information The Secretary shall, in consultation with States receiving funds provided under this part, develop methods of disseminating information on any research, evaluation, or study conducted under this section, including facilitating the sharing of information and best practices among States and localities. (d) State-initiated evaluations A State shall be eligible to receive funding to evaluate the State program funded under this part or any other State program funded with qualified State expenditures (as defined in section 409(a)(7)(B)(i)) if— (1) the State submits to the Secretary a description of the proposed evaluation; (2) the Secretary determines that the design and approach of the proposed evaluation is rigorous and is likely to yield information that is credible and will be useful to other States; and (3) unless waived by the Secretary, the State contributes to the cost of the evaluation, from non-Federal sources, an amount equal to at least 25 percent of the cost of the proposed evaluation. (e) Census Bureau research (1) The Bureau of the Census shall implement or enhance household surveys of program participation, in consultation with the Secretary and the Burueau of Labor Statistics and made available to interested parties, to allow for the assessment of the outcomes of continued welfare reform on the economic and child well-being of low-income families with children, including those who received assistance or services from a State program funded under this part or any other State program funded with qualified State expenditures (as defined in section 409(a)(7)(B)(i)). The content of the surveys should include such information as may be necessary to examine the issues of unmarried childbearing, marriage, welfare dependency and compliance with work requirements, the beginning and ending of spells of assistance, work, earnings and employment stability, and the well-being of children. (2) To carry out the activities specified in paragraph (1), the Bureau of the Census, the Secretary, and the Bureau of Labor Statistics shall consider ways to improve the surveys and data derived from the surveys to— (A) address underreporting of the receipt of means-tested benefits and tax benefits for low-income individuals and families; (B) increase understanding of poverty spells and long-term poverty, including by facilitating the matching of information to better understand intergenerational poverty; (C) generate a better geographical understanding of poverty such as through State-based estimates and measures of neighborhood poverty; (D) increase understanding of the effects of means-tested benefits and tax benefits on the earnings of low-income families; and (E) improve how poverty and economic well-being are measured, including through the use of consumption measures. (f) Research and evaluation conducted under this section Research and evaluation conducted under this section designed to determine the effects of a program or policy (other than research conducted under subsection (e)) shall use experimental designs using random assignment or other reliable, evidence-based research methodologies that allow for the strongest possible causal inferences when random assignment is not feasible. (g) Development of what works clearinghouse of proven and promising approaches to move welfare recipients into work (1) In general The Secretary, in consultation with the Secretary of Labor, shall develop a database (which shall be referred to as the What Works Clearinghouse of Proven and Promising Projects to Move Welfare Recipients into Work ) of the projects that used a proven approach or a promising approach in moving welfare recipients into work, based on independent, rigorous evaluations of the projects. The database shall include a separate listing of projects that used a developmental approach in delivering services and a further separate listing of the projects with no or negative effects. The Secretary shall add to the What Works Clearinghouse of Proven and Promising Projects to Move Welfare Recipients into Work data about the projects that, based on an independent, well-conducted experimental evaluation of a program or project, using random assignment or other research methodologies that allow for the strongest possible causal inferences, have shown they are proven, promising, developmental, or ineffective approaches. (2) Criteria for evidence of effectiveness of approach The Secretary, in consultation with the Secretary of Labor and organizations with experience in evaluating research on the effectiveness of various approaches in delivering services to move welfare recipients into work, shall— (A) establish criteria for evidence of effectiveness; and (B) ensure that the process for establishing the criteria— (i) is transparent; (ii) is consistent across agencies; (iii) provides opportunity for public comment; and (iv) takes into account efforts of Federal agencies to identify and publicize effective interventions, including efforts at the Department of Health and Human Services, the Department of Education, and the Department of Justice. (3) Definitions In this subsection: (A) Approach The term approach means a process, product, strategy, or practice that is— (i) research-based, based on the results of 1 or more empirical studies, and linked to program-determined outcomes; and (ii) evaluated using rigorous research designs. (B) Proven approach The term proven approach means an approach that— (i) meets the requirements of a promising approach; and (ii) has demonstrated significant positive outcomes at more than 1 site in terms of increasing work and earnings of participants, reducing poverty and dependence, or strengthening families. (C) Promising approach The term promising approach means an approach— (i) that meets the requirements of subparagraph (D)(i); (ii) that has been evaluated using well-designed and rigorous randomized controlled or quasi-experimental research designs; (iii) that has demonstrated significant positive outcomes at only 1 site in terms of increasing work and earnings of participants, reducing poverty and dependence, or strengthening families; and (iv) under which the benefits of the positive outcomes have exceeded the costs of achieving the outcomes. (D) Developmental approach The term developmental approach means an approach that— (i) is research-based, grounded in relevant empirically-based knowledge, and linked to program-determined outcomes; (ii) is evaluated using rigorous research designs; and (iii) has yet to demonstrate a significant positive outcome in terms of increasing work and earnings of participants in a cost-effective way. . 3. Effective date The amendment made by this Act shall take effect on October 1, 2016.

June 10, 2016 Reported from the Committee on Ways and Means with an amendment June 10, 2016 The Committee on Oversight and Government Reform discharged; committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union and ordered to be printed