Strengthening Medicare Advantage through Innovation and Transparency for Seniors of 2015

Bill: 114-hr-2570
Sponsor: full_name: Rep. Black, Diane [R-TN-6]
Introduced: 2015-05-22
Policy area: Health
Subjects: Health care costs and insurance

Health care quality

Health information and medical records

Health technology, devices, supplies

Home and outpatient care

Medicare

Prescription drugs

Surgery and anesthesia
Latest action: action_date: 2015-06-18
text: Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.

Summaries:
action_date: 2015-05-22
action_desc: Introduced in House
text: <p><b>Value Based Insurance Design for Better Care Act of 2015 or the VBID for Better Care Act of 2015</b></p> <p>Directs the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) to establish a three-year demonstration program to test the use of value-based insurance design methodologies under the eligible Medicare Advantage plans offered by Medicare Advantage organizations under part C (Medicare+Choice) of title XVIII (Medicare) of the Social Security Act.</p> <p>Defines "value-based insurance design methodology" as one for identifying specific prescription medications, and clinical services payable under Medicare, for which copayments, coinsurance, or both would improve the management of specific chronic clinical conditions because of the high value and effectiveness of such medications and services for such specific chronic clinical conditions, as approved by the Secretary.</p> <p>Authorizes HHS to expand the duration and scope of the demonstration program to an appropriate extent if specified requirements are met.</p>

action_date: 2015-06-17
action_desc: Passed House amended
text: <p><b>Strengthening Medicare Advantage through Innovation and Transparency for Seniors Act of 2015</b></p> <p>(Sec. 2) This bill amends title XVIII (Medicare) of the Social Security Act (SSAct) with respect to criteria for qualifying as a meaningful user of electronic health records (meaningful EHR user). For any payment year after 2015 any patient encounter of an eligible professional occurring at an eligible ambulatory surgical center shall not be treated as one in determining whether an eligible professional qualifies as a meaningful EHR user.</p>  <p>(Sec. 3) HHS shall establish a three-year demonstration program to test the use of value-based insurance design methodologies under the eligible Medicare Advantage (MA) plans offered by MA organizations under Medicare part C.</p> <p>&quot;Value-based insurance design methodology" is one for identifying specific prescription medications, and clinical services payable under Medicare, for which copayments, coinsurance, or both would improve the management of specific chronic clinical conditions because of the high value and effectiveness of such medications and services for such specific chronic clinical conditions, as approved by HHS.</p> <p> HHS may expand the duration and scope of the demonstration program to an appropriate extent if specified requirements are met.</p> <p>(Sec. 4) Payment amounts are prescribed for infusion drugs and biologicals furnished through durable medical equipment (DME) on or after January 1, 2017.</p> <p>(Sec. 5) It is the sense of Congress that HHS:</p> <ul> <li>has incorrectly interpreted the determination of blended benchmark amounts as prohibiting the provision of any Medicare quality incentive payments with respect to MA plans that exceed the payment benchmark cap for the area served by those plans; and</li> <li>should immediately apply quality incentive payments with respect to such MA plans without regard to limits.</li> </ul> <p>(Sec. 6) $220 million shall be available to the Medicare Improvement Fund during and after FY2020.</p> <p>(Sec. 7) DME competitive acquisition programs shall not cover infusion drugs and biologicals.</p>

tv_txt: I 114th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 2570 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES May 22, 2015 Mrs. Black (for herself, Mr. Blumenauer , and Mrs. McMorris Rodgers ) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means , and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce , for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned A BILL To establish a demonstration program requiring the utilization of Value-Based Insurance Design to demonstrate that reducing the copayments or coinsurance charged to Medicare beneficiaries for selected high-value prescription medications and clinical services can increase their utilization and ultimately improve clinical outcomes and lower health care expenditures.

1. Short title This Act may be cited as the Value Based Insurance Design for Better Care Act of 2015 or the VBID for Better Care Act of 2015 . 2. Findings Congress makes the following findings: (1) A growing body of evidence demonstrates that increases in patient-level financial barriers (including deductibles, copayments, and coinsurance) for high-value medical services (such as prescription medications, clinician visits, diagnostic tests, and procedures) systematically reduce their use. Savings attributable to cost-related decreased utilization of specific services may lead to an increase in total medical expenditures due to increased use of other related clinical services, such as hospitalizations and emergency room visits. (2) Empirical research studies demonstrate that reductions in beneficiary out-of-pocket expenses for high-value prescription medications and clinical services can mitigate the adverse health and financial consequences attributable to cost-related decreased utilization of high-value services. (3) Financial barriers to prescription medications and clinical services that are deemed to be high-value should be reduced or eliminated to increase their use. (4) Value-Based Insurance Design is a methodology that adjusts patient out-of-pocket costs for prescription medications and clinical services according to the clinical value—not exclusively the cost. Value-Based Insurance Design is based on the concept of clinical nuance that recognizes— (A) prescription medications and clinical services differ in the clinical benefit provided; and (B) the clinical benefit derived from a specific prescription medication or clinical service depends on the clinical situation, the provider, and where the care is delivered. (5) The current one-size-fits-all copayment or coinsurance design for prescription medications and clinical services provided under the Medicare program does not recognize the well-established value differences in health outcomes produced by various medical interventions. (6) The establishment by Medicare of copayment and coinsurance requirements using Value-Based Insurance Design methodologies will improve patient-centered health outcomes, enhance personal responsibility, and afford a more efficient use of taxpayer dollars. 3. Demonstration program (a) In general The Secretary of Health and Human Services (in this section referred to as the Secretary ) shall establish a 3-year demonstration program to test the use of value-based insurance design methodologies (as defined in subsection (c)(1)) under eligible Medicare Advantage plans offered by Medicare Advantage organizations under part C of title XVIII of the Social Security Act ( 42 U.S.C. 1395w–21 et seq. ). (b) Demonstration program design (1) Selection of Medicare Advantage sites and eligible Medicare Advantage plans Not later than two years after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall— (A) select at least two Medicare Advantage sites with respect to which to conduct the demonstration program under this section; and (B) approve eligible Medicare Advantage plans to participate in such demonstration program. In selecting Medicare Advantage sites under subparagraph (A), the Secretary shall take into account area differences as well as the availability of health maintenance organization plans and preferred provider organization plans offered in such sites. (2) Start of demonstration The demonstration program shall begin not later than the third plan year beginning after the date of the enactment of this Act. (3) Eligible Medicare Advantage plans For purposes of this section, the term eligible Medicare Advantage plan means a Medicare Advantage plan under part C of title XVIII of the Social Security Act ( 42 U.S.C. 1395w–21 et seq. ) that meets the following requirements: (A) The plan is an Medicare Advantage regional plan (as defined in paragraph (4) of section 1859(b) of such Act ( 42 U.S.C. 1395w–28(b) )) or Medicare Advantage local plan (as defined in paragraph (5) of such section) offered in the Medicare Advantage region selected under paragraph (1)(A). (B) The plan has— (i) (I) a quality rating under section 1853(n)(4) of such Act ( 42 U.S.C. 1395w–23(n)(4) ) of 4 stars or higher based on the most recent data available for such year, or (II) in the case of a specialized Medicare Advantage plan for special needs individuals, as defined in section 1859(b)(6)(A) of such Act ( 42 U.S.C. 1395w–28(b)(6)(A) ), a quality rating under 1853(n)(4) of such Act ( 42 U.S.C. 1395w–23(n)(4) ) equal to or higher than the national average for special needs plans (excluding Institutional-Special needs plans) based on the most recent data available for such year; and (ii) at least 20 percent of the population to whom the plan is offered consists of subsidy eligible individuals (as defined in section 1860D–14(a)(3)(A) of the Social Security Act ( 42 U.S.C. 1395w–114(a)(3)(A) )). (4) Disclosure to beneficiaries The Secretary shall provide to each individual eligible to enroll under a Medicare Advantage plan approved to participate under the demonstration program during a plan year for which the plan is so selected— (A) notification that the plan is participating in such demonstration program; (B) background information on the demonstration program; (C) clinical data derived from the studies resulting from the demonstration program; and (D) notification of the potential benefits that the individual will receive, and of the other potential impacts that the individual will experience, on account of the participation of the plan in the demonstration program. (c) Value-Based insurance design methodologies (1) Definition For purposes of this section, the term value-based insurance design methodology means a methodology for identifying specific prescription medications, and clinical services that are payable under title XVIII of the Social Security Act, for which copayments, coinsurance, or both, would improve the management of specific chronic clinical conditions because of the high value and effectiveness of such medications and services for such specific chronic clinical conditions, as approved by the Secretary. (2) Use of methodologies to reduce copayments and coinsurance A Medicare Advantage organization offering an eligible Medicare Advantage plan approved to participate under the demonstration program, for each plan year for which the plan is so selected and using value-based insurance design methodologies— (A) shall identify each prescription medication and clinical service covered under such plan for which the plan proposes to reduce or eliminate the copayment or coinsurance, with respect to the management of specific chronic clinical conditions (as specified by the Secretary) of Medicare Advantage eligible individuals (as defined in section 1851(a)(3) of the Social Security Act ( 42 U.S.C. 1395w–21(a)(3) )) enrolled under such plans, for such plan year; (B) may, for such plan year, reduce or eliminate copayments, coinsurance, or both for such prescription medication and clinical services so identified with respect to the management of such conditions of such individuals— (i) if such reduction or elimination is evidence-based and for the purpose of encouraging such individuals in such plan to use such prescription medications and clinical services (such as preventive care, primary care, specialty visits, diagnostic tests, procedures, and durable medical equipment) with respect to such conditions; and (ii) for the purpose of encouraging such individuals in such plan to use health care providers that such organization has identified with respect to such plan year as being high value providers; and (C) if a reduction or elimination is applied pursuant to subparagraph (B), with respect to such medication and clinical services, shall, for such plan year, count toward the deductible applicable to such individual under such plan amounts that would have been payable by the individual as copayment or coinsurance for such medication and services if the reduction or elimination had not been applied. (3) Prohibition of increases of copayments and coinsurance In no case may any Medicare Advantage plan participating in the demonstration program increase, for any plan year for which the plan is so participating, the amount of copayments or coinsurance for any item or service covered under such plan for purposes of discouraging the use of such item or service. (d) Report on implementation (1) In general Not later than 1 year after the date on which the demonstration program under this section begins under subsection (b)(2), the Secretary shall submit to Congress a report on the status of the implementation of the demonstration program. (2) Elements The report required by paragraph (1) shall, with respect to eligible Medicare Advantage plans participating in the demonstration program for the first plan year of such program, include the following: (A) A list of each medication and service identified pursuant to subsection (c)(2)(A) for such plan with respect to such plan year. (B) For each such medication or service so identified, the amount of the copayment or coinsurance required under such plan with respect to such plan year for such medication or service and the amount of the reduction of such copayment or coinsurance from a previous plan year. (C) For each provider identified pursuant to subsection (c)(2)(B)(ii) for such plan with respect to such plan year, a statement of the amount of the copayment or coinsurance required under such plan with respect to such plan year and the amount of the reduction of such copayment or coinsurance from the previous plan year. (e) Review and assessment of utilization of value-Based insurance design methodologies (1) In general The Secretary shall enter into a contract or agreement with an independent entity to review and assess the implementation of the demonstration program under this section. The review and assessment shall include the following: (A) An assessment of the utilization of value-based insurance design methodologies by Medicare Advantage plans participating under such program. (B) An analysis of whether reducing or eliminating the copayment or coinsurance for each medication and clinical service identified pursuant to subsection (c)(2)(A) resulted in increased adherence to medication regimens, increased service utilization, improvement in quality metrics, better health outcomes, and enhanced beneficiary experience. (C) An analysis of the extent to which costs to Medicare Advantage plans under part C of title XVIII of the Social Security Act participating in the demonstration program is less than costs to Medicare Advantage plans under such part that are not participating in the demonstration program. (D) An analysis of whether reducing or eliminating the copayment or coinsurance for providers identified pursuant to subsection (c)(2)(B)(ii) resulted in improvement in quality metrics, better health outcomes, and enhanced beneficiary experience. (E) An analysis, for each provider so identified, the extent to which costs to Medicare Advantage plans under part C of title XVIII of the Social Security Act participating in the demonstration program is less than costs to Medicare Advantage plans under such part that are not participating in the demonstration program. (F) Such other matters as the Secretary considers appropriate. (2) Report The contract or agreement entered into under paragraph (1) shall require such entity to submit to the Secretary a report on the review and assessment conducted by the entity under such paragraph in time for the inclusion of the results of such report in the report required by paragraph (3). Such report shall include a description, in clear language, of the manner in which the entity conducted the review and assessment. (3) Report to Congress Not later than 4 years after the date on which the demonstration program begins under subsection (b)(2), the Secretary shall submit to Congress a report on the review and assessment of the demonstration program conducted under this subsection. The report shall include the following: (A) A description of the results of the review and assessment included in the report submitted pursuant to paragraph (2). (B) Such recommendations as the Secretary considers appropriate for enhancing the utilization of the methodologies applied under the demonstration program to all Medicare Advantage plans under part C of title XVIII of the Social Security Act so as to reduce copayments and coinsurance under such plans paid by Medicare beneficiaries for high-value prescription medications and clinical services for which coverage is provided under such plans and to otherwise improve the quality of health care provided under such plans. (4) Oversight report Not later than three years after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to Congress a report on the demonstration program that includes an assessment, with respect to individuals enrolled under Medicare Advantage plans approved to participate under the demonstration program, of the impact that the age, co-morbidities, and geographic regions of such individuals had upon the implementation of the demonstration program by the plans with respect to such individuals. (f) Savings In no case may any reduction in beneficiary copayments or coinsurance resulting from the implementation of the demonstration program under this section result in expenditures under parts A, B, and D of the title XVIII of the Social Security Act that are greater than such expenditures without application of this section. (g) Expansion of demonstration program Taking into account the review and assessment conducted under subsection (e), the Secretary may, through notice and comment rulemaking, expand (including implementation on a nationwide basis) the duration and scope of the demonstration program under title XVIII of the Social Security Act, other than under the original Medicare fee-for-service program under parts A and B of such title, to the extent determined appropriate by the Secretary, if the requirements of paragraphs (1), (2) and (3) of subsection (c) of section 1115A of the Social Security Act ( 42 U.S.C. 1315a ), as applied to the testing of a model under subsection (b) of such section, applied to the demonstration under this section. (h) Waiver authority The Secretary may waive such provisions of titles XI and XVIII of the Social Security Act as may be necessary to carry out the demonstration program under this section. (i) Implementation funding For purposes of carrying out the demonstration program under this section, the Secretary shall provide for the transfer from the Federal Hospital Insurance Trust Fund under section 1817 of the Social Security Act ( 42 U.S.C. 1395i ) and the Federal Supplementary Insurance Trust Fund under section 1841 of the Social Security Act ( 42 U.S.C. 1395t ), including the Medicare Prescription Drug Account in such Trust Fund, in such proportion as determined appropriate by the Secretary, of such sums as may be necessary.

tv_txt: I 114th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 2570 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES AN ACT To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act with respect to the treatment of patient encounters in ambulatory surgical centers in determining meaningful EHR use, establish a demonstration program requiring the utilization of Value-Based Insurance Design to demonstrate that reducing the copayments or coinsurance charged to Medicare beneficiaries for selected high-value prescription medications and clinical services can increase their utilization and ultimately improve clinical outcomes and lower health care expenditures, and for other purposes.

1. Short title This Act may be cited as the Strengthening Medicare Advantage through Innovation and Transparency for Seniors Act of 2015 . 2. Treatment of patient encounters in ambulatory surgical centers in determining meaningful EHR use Section 1848(o)(2) of the Social Security Act ( 42 U.S.C. 1395w–4(o)(2) ) is amended by adding at the end of the following new subparagraph: (D) Treatment of patient encounters at ambulatory surgical centers (i) In general Subject to clause (ii), for a payment year after 2015 any patient encounter of an eligible professional occurring at an ambulatory surgical center (described in section 1833(i)(1)(A)) shall not be treated as a patient encounter in determining whether an eligible professional qualifies as a meaningful EHR user. Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Secretary may implement this clause by program instruction or otherwise. (ii) Sunset Clause (i) shall no longer apply as of the first payment year that begins more than 3 years after the date the Secretary determines, through notice and comment rulemaking, that certified EHR technology is applicable to the ambulatory surgical center setting. . 3. Value-based insurance design demonstration program (a) In general The Secretary of Health and Human Services (in this section referred to as the Secretary ) shall establish a 3-year demonstration program to test the use of value-based insurance design methodologies (as defined in subsection (c)(1)) under eligible Medicare Advantage plans offered by Medicare Advantage organizations under part C of title XVIII of the Social Security Act ( 42 U.S.C. 1395w–21 et seq. ). The Secretary may extend the program to a duration of 4 or 5 years, as determined necessary by the Secretary in coordination with the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation. (b) Demonstration program design (1) Selection of Medicare Advantage sites and eligible Medicare Advantage plans Not later than 2 years after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall— (A) select at least two Medicare Advantage sites with respect to which to conduct the demonstration program under this section; and (B) approve eligible Medicare Advantage plans to participate in such demonstration program. In selecting Medicare Advantage sites under subparagraph (A), the Secretary shall take into account area differences as well as the availability of health maintenance organization plans and preferred provider organization plans offered in such sites. (2) Start of demonstration The demonstration program shall begin not later than the third plan year beginning after the date of the enactment of this Act. (3) Eligible Medicare Advantage plans For purposes of this section, the term eligible Medicare Advantage plan means a Medicare Advantage plan under part C of title XVIII of the Social Security Act ( 42 U.S.C. 1395w–21 et seq. ) that meets the following requirements: (A) The plan is an Medicare Advantage regional plan (as defined in paragraph (4) of section 1859(b) of such Act ( 42 U.S.C. 1395w–28(b) )) or Medicare Advantage local plan (as defined in paragraph (5) of such section) offered in the Medicare Advantage region selected under paragraph (1)(A). (B) The plan has— (i) (I) a quality rating under section 1853(o) of such Act ( 42 U.S.C. 1395w–23(o) ) of 4 stars or higher based on the most recent data available for such year, or (II) in the case of a specialized Medicare Advantage plan for special needs individuals, as defined in section 1859(b)(6)(A) of such Act ( 42 U.S.C. 1395w–28(b)(6)(A) ), a quality rating under section 1853(o) of such Act ( 42 U.S.C. 1395w–23(o) ) equal to or higher than the national average for special needs plans (excluding Institutional-Special needs plans) based on the most recent data available for such year; and (ii) at least 20 percent of the population to whom the plan is offered in a service area consists of subsidy eligible individuals (as defined in section 1860D–14(a)(3)(A) of the Social Security Act ( 42 U.S.C. 1395w–114(a)(3)(A) )). (4) Disclosure to beneficiaries The Secretary shall provide to each individual eligible to enroll under a Medicare Advantage plan approved to participate under the demonstration program during a plan year for which the plan is so selected— (A) notification that the plan is participating in such demonstration program; (B) background information on the demonstration program; (C) clinical data derived from the studies resulting from the demonstration program; and (D) notification of the potential benefits that the individual will receive, and of the other potential impacts that the individual will experience, on account of the participation of the plan in the demonstration program. (c) Value-Based insurance design methodologies (1) Definition For purposes of this section, the term value-based insurance design methodology means a methodology for identifying specific prescription medications, and clinical services that are payable under title XVIII of the Social Security Act, for which the reduction of copayments, coinsurance, or both, would improve the management of specific chronic clinical conditions because of the high value and effectiveness of such medications and services for such specific chronic clinical conditions, as approved by the Secretary. (2) Use of methodologies to reduce copayments and coinsurance A Medicare Advantage organization offering an eligible Medicare Advantage plan approved to participate under the demonstration program, for each plan year for which the plan is so selected and using value-based insurance design methodologies— (A) shall identify each prescription medication and clinical service covered under such plan for which the plan proposes to reduce or eliminate the copayment or coinsurance, with respect to the management of specific chronic clinical conditions (as specified by the Secretary) of Medicare Advantage eligible individuals (as defined in section 1851(a)(3) of the Social Security Act ( 42 U.S.C. 1395w–21(a)(3) )) enrolled under such plans, for such plan year; (B) may, for such plan year, reduce or eliminate copayments, coinsurance, or both for such prescription medication and clinical services so identified with respect to the management of such conditions of such individuals— (i) if such reduction or elimination is evidence-based and for the purpose of encouraging such individuals in such plan to use such prescription medications and clinical services (such as preventive care, primary care, specialty visits, diagnostic tests, procedures, and durable medical equipment) with respect to such conditions; and (ii) for the purpose of encouraging such individuals in such plan to use health care providers that such organization has identified with respect to such plan year as being high value providers; and (C) if a reduction or elimination is applied pursuant to subparagraph (B), with respect to such medication and clinical services, shall, for such plan year, count toward the deductible applicable to such individual under such plan amounts that would have been payable by the individual as copayment or coinsurance for such medication and services if the reduction or elimination had not been applied. (3) Prohibition of increases of copayments and coinsurance In no case may any Medicare Advantage plan participating in the demonstration program increase, for any plan year for which the plan is so participating, the amount of copayments or coinsurance for any item or service covered under such plan for purposes of discouraging the use of such item or service. (d) Report on implementation (1) In general Not later than 1 year after the date on which the demonstration program under this section begins under subsection (b)(2), the Secretary shall submit to Congress a report on the status of the implementation of the demonstration program. (2) Elements The report required by paragraph (1) shall, with respect to eligible Medicare Advantage plans participating in the demonstration program for the first plan year of such program, include the following: (A) A list of each medication and service identified pursuant to subsection (c)(2)(A) for such plan with respect to such plan year. (B) For each such medication or service so identified, the amount of the copayment or coinsurance required under such plan with respect to such plan year for such medication or service and the amount of the reduction of such copayment or coinsurance from a previous plan year. (C) For each provider identified pursuant to subsection (c)(2)(B)(ii) for such plan with respect to such plan year, a statement of the amount of the copayment or coinsurance required under such plan with respect to such plan year and the amount of the reduction of such copayment or coinsurance from the previous plan year. (e) Review and assessment of utilization of value-Based insurance design methodologies (1) In general The Secretary shall enter into a contract or agreement with an independent entity to review and assess the implementation of the demonstration program under this section. The review and assessment shall include the following: (A) An assessment of the utilization of value-based insurance design methodologies by Medicare Advantage plans participating under such program. (B) An analysis of whether reducing or eliminating the copayment or coinsurance for each medication and clinical service identified pursuant to subsection (c)(2)(A) resulted in increased adherence to medication regimens, increased service utilization, improvement in quality metrics, better health outcomes, and enhanced beneficiary experience. (C) An analysis of the extent to which costs to Medicare Advantage plans under part C of title XVIII of the Social Security Act participating in the demonstration program is less than costs to Medicare Advantage plans under such part that are not participating in the demonstration program. (D) An analysis of whether reducing or eliminating the copayment or coinsurance for providers identified pursuant to subsection (c)(2)(B)(ii) resulted in improvement in quality metrics, better health outcomes, and enhanced beneficiary experience. (E) An analysis, for each provider so identified, the extent to which costs to Medicare Advantage plans under part C of title XVIII of the Social Security Act participating in the demonstration program is less than costs to Medicare Advantage plans under such part that are not participating in the demonstration program. (F) Such other matters as the Secretary considers appropriate. (2) Report The contract or agreement entered into under paragraph (1) shall require such entity to submit to the Secretary a report on the review and assessment conducted by the entity under such paragraph in time for the inclusion of the results of such report in the report required by paragraph (3). Such report shall include a description, in clear language, of the manner in which the entity conducted the review and assessment. (3) Report to Congress Not later than 4 years after the date on which the demonstration program begins under subsection (b)(2), the Secretary shall submit to Congress a report on the review and assessment of the demonstration program conducted under this subsection. The report shall include the following: (A) A description of the results of the review and assessment included in the report submitted pursuant to paragraph (2). (B) Such recommendations as the Secretary considers appropriate for enhancing the utilization of the methodologies applied under the demonstration program to all Medicare Advantage plans under part C of title XVIII of the Social Security Act so as to reduce copayments and coinsurance under such plans paid by Medicare beneficiaries for high-value prescription medications and clinical services for which coverage is provided under such plans and to otherwise improve the quality of health care provided under such plans. (4) Oversight report Not later than 3 years after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to Congress a report on the demonstration program that includes an assessment, with respect to individuals enrolled under Medicare Advantage plans approved to participate under the demonstration program, of the impact that the age, co-morbidities, and geographic regions of such individuals had upon the implementation of the demonstration program by the plans with respect to such individuals. (f) Savings In no case may any reduction in beneficiary copayments or coinsurance resulting from the implementation of the demonstration program under this section result in expenditures under parts A, B, and D of the title XVIII of the Social Security Act that are greater than such expenditures without application of this section. (g) Expansion of demonstration program Taking into account the review and assessment conducted under subsection (e), the Secretary may, through notice and comment rulemaking, expand (including implementation on a nationwide basis) the duration and scope of the demonstration program under title XVIII of the Social Security Act, other than under the original medicare fee-for-service program under parts A and B of such title, to the extent determined appropriate by the Secretary, if the requirements of paragraphs (1), (2), and (3) of subsection (c) of section 1115A of the Social Security Act ( 42 U.S.C. 1315a ), as applied to the testing of a model under subsection (b) of such section, applied to the demonstration under this section. (h) Waiver authority The Secretary may waive such provisions of titles XI and XVIII of the Social Security Act as may be necessary to carry out the demonstration program under this section. (i) Implementation funding For purposes of carrying out the demonstration program under this section, the Secretary shall provide for the transfer from the Federal Hospital Insurance Trust Fund under section 1817 of the Social Security Act ( 42 U.S.C. 1395i ) and the Federal Supplementary Insurance Trust Fund under section 1841 of the Social Security Act ( 42 U.S.C. 1395t ), including the Medicare Prescription Drug Account in such Trust Fund, in such proportion as determined appropriate by the Secretary, of such sums as may be necessary. 4. Treatment of infusion drugs furnished through durable medical equipment Section 1842(o)(1) of the Social Security Act ( 42 U.S.C. 1395u(o)(1) ) is amended— (1) in subparagraph (C), by inserting (and including a drug or biological described in subparagraph (D)(i) furnished on or after January 1, 2017) after 2005 ; and (2) in subparagraph (D)— (A) by striking infusion drugs and inserting infusion drugs or biologicals each place it appears; and (B) in clause (i)— (i) by striking 2004 and inserting 2004, and before January 1, 2017 ; and (ii) by striking for such drug . 5. Sense of Congress regarding the implementation and distribution of quality incentive payments to Medicare Advantage plans It is the sense of Congress that— (1) the Secretary of Health and Human Services has incorrectly interpreted subsection (n) of section 1853 of the Social Security Act ( 42 U.S.C. 1395w–23 ) as prohibiting the provision of any Medicare quality incentive payments under subsection (o) of such section with respect to Medicare Advantage plans that exceed the payment benchmark cap under such subsection (n) for the area served by such plans; and (2) the Secretary should immediately apply quality incentive payments under such subsection (o) with respect to such Medicare Advantage plans without regard to the limits set forth in such subsection (n). 6. Medicare Improvement Fund Section 1898(b)(1) of the Social Security Act ( 42 U.S.C. 1395iii(b)(1) ) is amended by striking during and after fiscal year 2020, $0 and inserting after fiscal year 2020, $220,000,000 . 7. Non-inclusion of DME infusion drugs under DME competitive acquisition programs (a) In general Section 1847(a)(2)(A) of the Social Security Act ( 42 U.S.C. 1395w–3(a)(2)(A) ) is amended— (1) by striking and excluding and inserting , excluding ; and (2) by inserting before the period at the end the following: , and excluding drugs and biologicals described in section 1842(o)(1)(D) . (b) Conforming amendment Section 1842(o)(1)(D)(ii) of the Social Security Act ( 42 U.S.C. 1395u(o)(1)(D)(ii) ) is amended by striking 2007 and inserting 2007, and before the date of the enactment of the Strengthening Medicare Advantage through Innovation and Transparency for Seniors Act of 2015 .

Passed the House of Representatives June 17, 2015. Karen L. Haas, Clerk.

tv_txt: IIB 114th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 2570 IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES June 18, 2015 Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance AN ACT To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act with respect to the treatment of patient encounters in ambulatory surgical centers in determining meaningful EHR use, establish a demonstration program requiring the utilization of Value-Based Insurance Design to demonstrate that reducing the copayments or coinsurance charged to Medicare beneficiaries for selected high-value prescription medications and clinical services can increase their utilization and ultimately improve clinical outcomes and lower health care expenditures, and for other purposes.

1. Short title This Act may be cited as the Strengthening Medicare Advantage through Innovation and Transparency for Seniors Act of 2015 . 2. Treatment of patient encounters in ambulatory surgical centers in determining meaningful EHR use Section 1848(o)(2) of the Social Security Act ( 42 U.S.C. 1395w–4(o)(2) ) is amended by adding at the end of the following new subparagraph: (D) Treatment of patient encounters at ambulatory surgical centers (i) In general Subject to clause (ii), for a payment year after 2015 any patient encounter of an eligible professional occurring at an ambulatory surgical center (described in section 1833(i)(1)(A)) shall not be treated as a patient encounter in determining whether an eligible professional qualifies as a meaningful EHR user. Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Secretary may implement this clause by program instruction or otherwise. (ii) Sunset Clause (i) shall no longer apply as of the first payment year that begins more than 3 years after the date the Secretary determines, through notice and comment rulemaking, that certified EHR technology is applicable to the ambulatory surgical center setting. . 3. Value-based insurance design demonstration program (a) In general The Secretary of Health and Human Services (in this section referred to as the Secretary ) shall establish a 3-year demonstration program to test the use of value-based insurance design methodologies (as defined in subsection (c)(1)) under eligible Medicare Advantage plans offered by Medicare Advantage organizations under part C of title XVIII of the Social Security Act ( 42 U.S.C. 1395w–21 et seq. ). The Secretary may extend the program to a duration of 4 or 5 years, as determined necessary by the Secretary in coordination with the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation. (b) Demonstration program design (1) Selection of Medicare Advantage sites and eligible Medicare Advantage plans Not later than 2 years after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall— (A) select at least two Medicare Advantage sites with respect to which to conduct the demonstration program under this section; and (B) approve eligible Medicare Advantage plans to participate in such demonstration program. In selecting Medicare Advantage sites under subparagraph (A), the Secretary shall take into account area differences as well as the availability of health maintenance organization plans and preferred provider organization plans offered in such sites. (2) Start of demonstration The demonstration program shall begin not later than the third plan year beginning after the date of the enactment of this Act. (3) Eligible Medicare Advantage plans For purposes of this section, the term eligible Medicare Advantage plan means a Medicare Advantage plan under part C of title XVIII of the Social Security Act ( 42 U.S.C. 1395w–21 et seq. ) that meets the following requirements: (A) The plan is an Medicare Advantage regional plan (as defined in paragraph (4) of section 1859(b) of such Act ( 42 U.S.C. 1395w–28(b) )) or Medicare Advantage local plan (as defined in paragraph (5) of such section) offered in the Medicare Advantage region selected under paragraph (1)(A). (B) The plan has— (i) (I) a quality rating under section 1853(o) of such Act ( 42 U.S.C. 1395w–23(o) ) of 4 stars or higher based on the most recent data available for such year, or (II) in the case of a specialized Medicare Advantage plan for special needs individuals, as defined in section 1859(b)(6)(A) of such Act ( 42 U.S.C. 1395w–28(b)(6)(A) ), a quality rating under section 1853(o) of such Act ( 42 U.S.C. 1395w–23(o) ) equal to or higher than the national average for special needs plans (excluding Institutional-Special needs plans) based on the most recent data available for such year; and (ii) at least 20 percent of the population to whom the plan is offered in a service area consists of subsidy eligible individuals (as defined in section 1860D–14(a)(3)(A) of the Social Security Act ( 42 U.S.C. 1395w–114(a)(3)(A) )). (4) Disclosure to beneficiaries The Secretary shall provide to each individual eligible to enroll under a Medicare Advantage plan approved to participate under the demonstration program during a plan year for which the plan is so selected— (A) notification that the plan is participating in such demonstration program; (B) background information on the demonstration program; (C) clinical data derived from the studies resulting from the demonstration program; and (D) notification of the potential benefits that the individual will receive, and of the other potential impacts that the individual will experience, on account of the participation of the plan in the demonstration program. (c) Value-Based insurance design methodologies (1) Definition For purposes of this section, the term value-based insurance design methodology means a methodology for identifying specific prescription medications, and clinical services that are payable under title XVIII of the Social Security Act, for which the reduction of copayments, coinsurance, or both, would improve the management of specific chronic clinical conditions because of the high value and effectiveness of such medications and services for such specific chronic clinical conditions, as approved by the Secretary. (2) Use of methodologies to reduce copayments and coinsurance A Medicare Advantage organization offering an eligible Medicare Advantage plan approved to participate under the demonstration program, for each plan year for which the plan is so selected and using value-based insurance design methodologies— (A) shall identify each prescription medication and clinical service covered under such plan for which the plan proposes to reduce or eliminate the copayment or coinsurance, with respect to the management of specific chronic clinical conditions (as specified by the Secretary) of Medicare Advantage eligible individuals (as defined in section 1851(a)(3) of the Social Security Act ( 42 U.S.C. 1395w–21(a)(3) )) enrolled under such plans, for such plan year; (B) may, for such plan year, reduce or eliminate copayments, coinsurance, or both for such prescription medication and clinical services so identified with respect to the management of such conditions of such individuals— (i) if such reduction or elimination is evidence-based and for the purpose of encouraging such individuals in such plan to use such prescription medications and clinical services (such as preventive care, primary care, specialty visits, diagnostic tests, procedures, and durable medical equipment) with respect to such conditions; and (ii) for the purpose of encouraging such individuals in such plan to use health care providers that such organization has identified with respect to such plan year as being high value providers; and (C) if a reduction or elimination is applied pursuant to subparagraph (B), with respect to such medication and clinical services, shall, for such plan year, count toward the deductible applicable to such individual under such plan amounts that would have been payable by the individual as copayment or coinsurance for such medication and services if the reduction or elimination had not been applied. (3) Prohibition of increases of copayments and coinsurance In no case may any Medicare Advantage plan participating in the demonstration program increase, for any plan year for which the plan is so participating, the amount of copayments or coinsurance for any item or service covered under such plan for purposes of discouraging the use of such item or service. (d) Report on implementation (1) In general Not later than 1 year after the date on which the demonstration program under this section begins under subsection (b)(2), the Secretary shall submit to Congress a report on the status of the implementation of the demonstration program. (2) Elements The report required by paragraph (1) shall, with respect to eligible Medicare Advantage plans participating in the demonstration program for the first plan year of such program, include the following: (A) A list of each medication and service identified pursuant to subsection (c)(2)(A) for such plan with respect to such plan year. (B) For each such medication or service so identified, the amount of the copayment or coinsurance required under such plan with respect to such plan year for such medication or service and the amount of the reduction of such copayment or coinsurance from a previous plan year. (C) For each provider identified pursuant to subsection (c)(2)(B)(ii) for such plan with respect to such plan year, a statement of the amount of the copayment or coinsurance required under such plan with respect to such plan year and the amount of the reduction of such copayment or coinsurance from the previous plan year. (e) Review and assessment of utilization of value-Based insurance design methodologies (1) In general The Secretary shall enter into a contract or agreement with an independent entity to review and assess the implementation of the demonstration program under this section. The review and assessment shall include the following: (A) An assessment of the utilization of value-based insurance design methodologies by Medicare Advantage plans participating under such program. (B) An analysis of whether reducing or eliminating the copayment or coinsurance for each medication and clinical service identified pursuant to subsection (c)(2)(A) resulted in increased adherence to medication regimens, increased service utilization, improvement in quality metrics, better health outcomes, and enhanced beneficiary experience. (C) An analysis of the extent to which costs to Medicare Advantage plans under part C of title XVIII of the Social Security Act participating in the demonstration program is less than costs to Medicare Advantage plans under such part that are not participating in the demonstration program. (D) An analysis of whether reducing or eliminating the copayment or coinsurance for providers identified pursuant to subsection (c)(2)(B)(ii) resulted in improvement in quality metrics, better health outcomes, and enhanced beneficiary experience. (E) An analysis, for each provider so identified, the extent to which costs to Medicare Advantage plans under part C of title XVIII of the Social Security Act participating in the demonstration program is less than costs to Medicare Advantage plans under such part that are not participating in the demonstration program. (F) Such other matters as the Secretary considers appropriate. (2) Report The contract or agreement entered into under paragraph (1) shall require such entity to submit to the Secretary a report on the review and assessment conducted by the entity under such paragraph in time for the inclusion of the results of such report in the report required by paragraph (3). Such report shall include a description, in clear language, of the manner in which the entity conducted the review and assessment. (3) Report to Congress Not later than 4 years after the date on which the demonstration program begins under subsection (b)(2), the Secretary shall submit to Congress a report on the review and assessment of the demonstration program conducted under this subsection. The report shall include the following: (A) A description of the results of the review and assessment included in the report submitted pursuant to paragraph (2). (B) Such recommendations as the Secretary considers appropriate for enhancing the utilization of the methodologies applied under the demonstration program to all Medicare Advantage plans under part C of title XVIII of the Social Security Act so as to reduce copayments and coinsurance under such plans paid by Medicare beneficiaries for high-value prescription medications and clinical services for which coverage is provided under such plans and to otherwise improve the quality of health care provided under such plans. (4) Oversight report Not later than 3 years after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to Congress a report on the demonstration program that includes an assessment, with respect to individuals enrolled under Medicare Advantage plans approved to participate under the demonstration program, of the impact that the age, co-morbidities, and geographic regions of such individuals had upon the implementation of the demonstration program by the plans with respect to such individuals. (f) Savings In no case may any reduction in beneficiary copayments or coinsurance resulting from the implementation of the demonstration program under this section result in expenditures under parts A, B, and D of the title XVIII of the Social Security Act that are greater than such expenditures without application of this section. (g) Expansion of demonstration program Taking into account the review and assessment conducted under subsection (e), the Secretary may, through notice and comment rulemaking, expand (including implementation on a nationwide basis) the duration and scope of the demonstration program under title XVIII of the Social Security Act, other than under the original medicare fee-for-service program under parts A and B of such title, to the extent determined appropriate by the Secretary, if the requirements of paragraphs (1), (2), and (3) of subsection (c) of section 1115A of the Social Security Act ( 42 U.S.C. 1315a ), as applied to the testing of a model under subsection (b) of such section, applied to the demonstration under this section. (h) Waiver authority The Secretary may waive such provisions of titles XI and XVIII of the Social Security Act as may be necessary to carry out the demonstration program under this section. (i) Implementation funding For purposes of carrying out the demonstration program under this section, the Secretary shall provide for the transfer from the Federal Hospital Insurance Trust Fund under section 1817 of the Social Security Act ( 42 U.S.C. 1395i ) and the Federal Supplementary Insurance Trust Fund under section 1841 of the Social Security Act ( 42 U.S.C. 1395t ), including the Medicare Prescription Drug Account in such Trust Fund, in such proportion as determined appropriate by the Secretary, of such sums as may be necessary. 4. Treatment of infusion drugs furnished through durable medical equipment Section 1842(o)(1) of the Social Security Act ( 42 U.S.C. 1395u(o)(1) ) is amended— (1) in subparagraph (C), by inserting (and including a drug or biological described in subparagraph (D)(i) furnished on or after January 1, 2017) after 2005 ; and (2) in subparagraph (D)— (A) by striking infusion drugs and inserting infusion drugs or biologicals each place it appears; and (B) in clause (i)— (i) by striking 2004 and inserting 2004, and before January 1, 2017 ; and (ii) by striking for such drug . 5. Sense of Congress regarding the implementation and distribution of quality incentive payments to Medicare Advantage plans It is the sense of Congress that— (1) the Secretary of Health and Human Services has incorrectly interpreted subsection (n) of section 1853 of the Social Security Act ( 42 U.S.C. 1395w–23 ) as prohibiting the provision of any Medicare quality incentive payments under subsection (o) of such section with respect to Medicare Advantage plans that exceed the payment benchmark cap under such subsection (n) for the area served by such plans; and (2) the Secretary should immediately apply quality incentive payments under such subsection (o) with respect to such Medicare Advantage plans without regard to the limits set forth in such subsection (n). 6. Medicare Improvement Fund Section 1898(b)(1) of the Social Security Act ( 42 U.S.C. 1395iii(b)(1) ) is amended by striking during and after fiscal year 2020, $0 and inserting after fiscal year 2020, $220,000,000 . 7. Non-inclusion of DME infusion drugs under DME competitive acquisition programs (a) In general Section 1847(a)(2)(A) of the Social Security Act ( 42 U.S.C. 1395w–3(a)(2)(A) ) is amended— (1) by striking and excluding and inserting , excluding ; and (2) by inserting before the period at the end the following: , and excluding drugs and biologicals described in section 1842(o)(1)(D) . (b) Conforming amendment Section 1842(o)(1)(D)(ii) of the Social Security Act ( 42 U.S.C. 1395u(o)(1)(D)(ii) ) is amended by striking 2007 and inserting 2007, and before the date of the enactment of the Strengthening Medicare Advantage through Innovation and Transparency for Seniors Act of 2015 .

Passed the House of Representatives June 17, 2015. Karen L. Haas, Clerk