Prohibiting Discrimination Against Israel Act

Bill: 113-hr-4581
Sponsor: full_name: Rep. Stockman, Steve [R-TX-36]
Introduced: 2014-05-06
Policy area: International Affairs
Subjects: Appropriations

Arab-Israeli relations

Foreign and international corporations

Israel

Middle East

Multilateral development programs

Trade restrictions

West Bank
Latest action: action_date: 2014-05-06
text: Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.

Summaries:
action_date: 2014-05-06
action_desc: Introduced in House
text: <p>Prohibiting Discrimination Against Israel Act - States that it shall be U.S. policy that no funds authorized or appropriated by federal law may be expended for any international project that prohibits participation of Israeli organizations that operate beyond the 1949 armistice line.</p>

tv_txt: I 113th CONGRESS 2d Session H. R. 4581 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES May 6, 2014 Mr. Stockman introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs A BILL To prohibit the United States from funding projects that discriminate against Israeli organizations that operate beyond the 1949 armistice lines.

1. Short title This Act may be cited as the Prohibiting Discrimination Against Israel Act . 2. Congressional findings Congress finds: (1) In 1995, the Interim Agreement on the West Bank and the Gaza Strip (commonly referred to as the Oslo II Accord) formally divided Judea and Samaria into three administrative divisions, with Area C being under full Israeli civil and security control; therefore, foreign countries should not discriminate against Israeli organizations that operate there. (2) In 1995, the United States Congress passed the Jerusalem Embassy Act ( Public Law 104–45 ) which formally recognized Jerusalem as the capital of the State of Israel, and concluded that it should remain an undivided city. (3) The claim that Israeli settlements beyond the 1949 armistice lines are an obstacle to peace has been repeatedly disproven, and the 2005 expulsion from Gaza and the 2010 freeze on natural growth in the settlements harmed the peace process and led to an increase in violence, not a decrease. (4) Notwithstanding allegations to the contrary, Israeli settlements in these territories do not in any way violate Article 49 of the Fourth Geneva Convention; they are completely voluntary, and do not involve individual or mass forcible transfers prohibited by subpart (1) of Article 49. (5) In 2009, the Kingdom of Spain refused to allow a team from Ariel University Center of Samaria (now known as Ariel University) to participate in a solar energy competition funded by the United States Department of Energy solely because the university was located beyond Israel’s 1949 armistice line. (6) In 2010, The Government Pension Fund of Norway excluded several Israeli companies based solely on the fact that they operate in Judea and Samaria. (7) In 2010, the European Court of Justice issued a ruling in Brita GmbH v. Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Hafen (Case C–386/08) prohibiting Israeli products produced beyond the 1949 armistice line from being labeled as Made in Israel , which caused them to be subject to higher tariffs. (8) In 2010, the United Kingdom banned an Israeli tourism advertisement because it included a photograph of the Old City of Jerusalem, which is located beyond the 1949 armistice line and was fully annexed by Israel in 1980. (9) In 2013, the European Union issued orders forbidding its member states from cooperating, transferring funds, or giving scholarships or research grants to organizations beyond Israel’s 1949 armistice line. 3. General authorization It shall be the policy of the United States that no funds authorized or appropriated by Federal law may be expended for any international project that prohibits participation of Israeli organizations that operate beyond the 1949 armistice line. 4. Effective date The provisions of this Act shall take effect immediately following enactment.