Local Empowerment Act

Bill: 113-s-2761
Sponsor: full_name: Sen. Booker, Cory A. [D-NJ]
Introduced: 2014-07-31
Policy area: Transportation and Public Works
Subjects: Performance measurement

Regional and metropolitan planning

Roads and highways

Transportation programs funding

Urban and suburban affairs and development
Latest action: action_date: 2014-07-31
text: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.

Summaries:
action_date: 2014-07-31
action_desc: Introduced in Senate
text: <p>Local Empowerment Act - Revises requirements for the apportionment of state planning funds to metropolitan planning organizations (MPOs). </p> <p>Requires a state's apportionment to be distributed in accordance with a formula that prioritizes the needs of high performing MPOs.</p> <p>Revises certain allocations of surface transportation program funds to states for: (1) any areas with a population of fewer (under current law, non-urban areas with more) than 5,000, and (2) urbanized areas with a population of more than 200,000 that have a high performing MPO.</p> <p>Extends for FY2015-FY2018 a state's obligational authority to distribute a specified amount of surface transportation program funds for federal-aid highways and highway safety construction programs in urbanized areas with a population over 200,000, including those areas that have a high performing MPO.</p> <p>Makes permanent a special rule authorizing a state to obligate up to 15% of its apportionment of surface transportation program funds for each fiscal on roads functionally classified as minor collectors in areas of less than 5,000 population.</p> <p>Defines &quot;consolidated metropolitan planning organization&quot; to mean a sole MPO that serves a metropolitan statistical area.</p> <p>Prescribes requirements for the designation of new and consolidation of multiple MPOs within a metropolitan statistical area.</p> <p>Allows a MPO for an urbanized area with a population of more than 200,000 to request that the Secretary of Transportation (DOT) designate it as a high performing MPO. Specifies criteria the Secretary shall consider in making such designation.</p> <p>Makes similar changes to requirements for the transportation alternatives program.</p>

tv_txt: II 113th CONGRESS 2d Session S. 2761 IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES July 31, 2014 Mr. Booker introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works A BILL To amend title 23, United States Code, to permit the consolidation of metropolitan planning organizations, and for other purposes.

1. Short title This Act may be cited as the Local Empowerment Act . 2. Consolidated and high performing metropolitan planning organizations (a) Highways (1) Apportionment Section 104(d)(2)(A) of title 23, United States Code, is amended— (A) in clause (i), by striking ; and and inserting a semicolon; (B) by redesignating clause (ii) as clause (iii); and (C) by inserting after clause (i) the following: (ii) prioritizes the needs of high performing metropolitan planning organizations (as designated by the Secretary under section 134(r) or section 5303(r) of title 49); and . (2) Surface transportation program Section 133 of title 23, United States Code, is amended— (A) in subsection (d), by striking paragraph (1) and inserting the following: (1) Calculation Of the funds apportioned to a State under section 104(b)(2)— (A) 50 percent for a fiscal year shall be obligated under this section, in proportion to their relative shares of the population of the State— (i) in urbanized areas of the State with an urbanized area population of more than 200,000; (ii) in urban areas of the State with an urban area population of not fewer than 5,000 and not more than 200,000; and (iii) in areas of the State with an area population of fewer than 5,000; (B) 25 percent for a fiscal year may be obligated under this section in any area of the State; (C) (i) 25 percent for a fiscal year shall be obligated under this section, in proportion to their relative shares of the population of the State, in urbanized areas described in subparagraph (A)(i) that have a high performing metropolitan planning organization (as designated by the Secretary under section 134(r) or section 5303(r) of title 49); and (ii) the amount of the funds obligated to each urbanized area described in clause (i) shall— (I) be equal to 50 percent of the amount of the funds obligated to the urbanized area under subparagraph (A)(i); and (II) be in addition to the funds obligated to the urbanized area under subparagraph (A)(i); and (D) any funds not obligated under subparagraph (C) for a fiscal year shall be obligated under this section, in proportion to the relative shares of the population of the State, in any area of the State under subparagraph (B). ; (B) in subsection (f)— (i) in paragraph (1)— (I) by striking A State and inserting Except as provided in paragraph (2), a State ; (II) by striking section 104(b)(3) and inserting section 104(b)(2) ; and (III) by striking 2011 through 2014 and inserting 2015 through 2018 ; (ii) by redesignating paragraph (2) as paragraph (3); (iii) by inserting after paragraph (1) the following: (2) High performing metropolitan planning organizations (A) In general A State that is required to obligate in an urbanized area under subsections (d)(1)(A)(i) and (d)(1)(C) funds apportioned to the State under section 104(b)(2) shall make available to the urbanized area for each fiscal year during the period described in paragraph (1) an amount of obligation authority distributed to the State for Federal-aid highways and highway safety construction programs for use in the area that is equal to the amount obtained by multiplying— (i) the amount of funds that the State is required to obligate in the area under subsections (d)(1)(A)(i) and (d)(1)(C); and (ii) the ratio described in paragraph (1)(B). (B) Availability The obligation authority described in subparagraph (A) shall remain available for a period of 4 fiscal years. ; and (iv) in paragraph (3) (as so redesignated), by striking paragraph (1) and inserting paragraphs (1) and (2) ; and (C) in subsection (h)(1), by striking of fiscal years 2013 through 2014 and inserting fiscal year . (3) Metropolitan transportation planning Section 134 of title 23, United States Code, is amended— (A) in subsection (b)— (i) by redesignating paragraphs (1) through (7) as paragraphs (2) through (8), respectively; and (ii) by inserting before paragraph (2) (as so redesignated) the following: (1) Consolidated metropolitan planning organization The term consolidated metropolitan planning organization means a sole metropolitan planning organization that serves a metropolitan statistical area. ; (B) in subsection (d), by striking paragraph (6) and inserting the following: (6) Consolidation of metropolitan planning organizations in urbanized areas (A) Limitation on new metropolitan planning organizations A metropolitan planning organization shall not be designated— (i) within a metropolitan statistical area if another metropolitan planning organization already exists within the boundaries of the metropolitan statistical area; or (ii) outside the boundaries of a metropolitan statistical area. (B) Multiple existing metropolitan planning organizations If more than 1 existing metropolitan planning organizations are designated within a metropolitan statistical area— (i) each metropolitan planning organization may— (I) retain the designation as a metropolitan planning organization; or (II) agree to be consolidated with the other metropolitan planning organizations; (ii) the existing metropolitan planning organizations and the applicable Governors may— (I) beginning on January 1, 2022, and once every 10 years thereafter, revisit the agreement described in clause (i)(I); and (II) submit to the Secretary a justification of the continued necessity of that agreement; and (iii) each metropolitan planning organization shall cooperate with every other metropolitan planning organization to— (I) develop a single transportation improvement plan and a single long-range plan to be used by each metropolitan planning organization when developing individual plans of the metropolitan planning organization; and (II) establish a single set of performance targets that address the performance measures described in section 150(c) to be used in developing individual performance targets of the metropolitan planning organization in accordance with subsection (h)(2)(B). ; and (C) by adding at the end the following: (r) High performing metropolitan planning organizations (1) In general A metropolitan planning organization designated for an urbanized area with a population of more than 200,000 individuals may request that the Secretary designate the metropolitan planning organization as a high performing metropolitan planning organization. (2) Criteria In making a designation under paragraph (1), the Secretary shall consider— (A) the extent to which the metropolitan planning organization has an equitable and regional approach to decisionmaking; (B) the extent to which the metropolitan planning organization has incorporated the performance targets established pursuant to section 150 and sections 5303(h)(2), 5326(c) and 5329(d) of title 49 into the planning process; (C) whether the metropolitan planning organization is a consolidated metropolitan planning organization; (D) if the metropolitan planning organization is not a consolidated metropolitan planning organization, the extent to which the metropolitan planning organization is coordinating with all other metropolitan planning organizations designated for the same metropolitan statistical area; (E) the technical capacity of the metropolitan planning organization; and (F) any other guidance established by the Secretary. (3) Review A designation under paragraph (1) shall be effective for the period beginning on the date on which the designation is made and ending on the date that is 10 years after the date on which the designation is made. . (4) Transportation alternatives Section 213(c) of title 23, United States Code, is amended by striking paragraph (1) and inserting the following: (1) Calculation Of the funds reserved in a State under this section— (A) 50 percent for a fiscal year shall be obligated under this section to any eligible entity in proportion to their relative shares of the population of the State— (i) in urbanized areas of the State with an urbanized area population of more than 200,000; (ii) in urban areas of the State with an urban area population of not fewer than 5,000 and not more than 200,000; and (iii) in areas of the State with an area population of fewer than 5,000; (B) 25 percent for a fiscal year may be obligated under this section in any area of the State; (C) (i) 25 percent for a fiscal year shall be obligated under this section in urbanized areas described in subparagraph (A)(i) that have a high performing metropolitan planning organization (as designated by the Secretary under section 134(r) or section 5303(r) of title 49); and (ii) the amount of the funds obligated to each urbanized area described in clause (i) shall— (I) be equal to 50 percent of the amount of the funds obligated to the urbanized area under subparagraph (A)(i); and (II) be in addition to the funds obligated to the urbanized area under subparagraph (A)(i); and (D) any funds not obligated under subparagraph (C) for a fiscal year shall be obligated under this section in any area of the State under subparagraph (B). . (b) Transportation Section 5303 of title 49, United States Code, is amended— (1) in subsection (b)— (A) by redesignating paragraphs (1) through (7) as paragraphs (2) through (8), respectively; and (B) by inserting before paragraph (2) (as so redesignated) the following: (1) Consolidated metropolitan planning organization The term consolidated metropolitan planning organization means a single metropolitan planning organization that serves a metropolitan statistical area. ; (2) in subsection (d), by striking paragraph (6) and inserting the following: (6) Consolidation of metropolitan planning organizations in urbanized areas (A) Limitation on new metropolitan planning organizations A metropolitan planning organization shall not be designated— (i) within a metropolitan statistical area if another metropolitan planning organization already exists within the boundaries of the metropolitan statistical area; or (ii) outside the boundaries of a metropolitan statistical area. (B) Multiple existing metropolitan planning organizations If more than 1 existing metropolitan planning organizations are designated within a metropolitan statistical area— (i) each metropolitan planning organization may— (I) retain the designation as a metropolitan planning organization; or (II) agree to be consolidated with the other metropolitan planning organizations; (ii) the existing metropolitan planning organizations and the applicable Governors may— (I) beginning on January 1, 2022, and once every 10 years thereafter, revisit the agreement described in clause (i)(II); and (II) submit to the Secretary a justification of the continued necessity of that agreement; and (iii) each metropolitan planning organization shall cooperate with every other metropolitan planning organization to— (I) develop a single transportation improvement plan and a single long-range plan to be used by each metropolitan planning organization when developing individual plans of the metropolitan planning organization; and (II) establish a single set of performance targets that address the performance measures described in section 150(c) of title 23 to be used in developing individual performance targets of the metropolitan planning organization in accordance with subsection (h)(2)(B) and sections 5326(c)(2) and 5329(d). ; and (3) by adding at the end the following: (r) High performing metropolitan planning organizations (1) In general A metropolitan planning organization designated for an urbanized area with a population of more than 200,000 individuals may request that the Secretary designate the metropolitan planning organization as a high performing metropolitan planning organization. (2) Criteria In making a designation under paragraph (1), the Secretary shall consider— (A) the extent to which the metropolitan planning organization has an equitable and regional approach to decisionmaking; (B) the extent to which the metropolitan planning organization has incorporated the performance targets established pursuant to section 150 of title 23 and sections 5303(h)(2), 5326(c) and 5329(d) into the planning process; (C) whether the metropolitan planning organization is a consolidated metropolitan planning organization; (D) if the metropolitan planning organization is not a consolidated metropolitan planning organization, the extent to which the metropolitan planning organization is coordinating with all other metropolitan planning organizations designated for the same metropolitan statistical area; (E) the technical capacity of the metropolitan planning organization; and (F) any other guidance established by the Secretary. (3) Review A designation under paragraph (1) shall be effective for the period beginning on the date on which the designation is made and ending on the date that is 10 years after the date on which the designation is made. .