Sunshine in the Courtroom Act of 2013

Bill: 113-s-405
Sponsor: full_name: Sen. Grassley, Chuck [R-IA]
Introduced: 2013-02-28
Policy area: Law
Subjects: Broadcasting, cable, digital technologies

Evidence and witnesses

Federal appellate courts

Federal district courts

Judicial procedure and administration

Photography and imaging

Sound recording

Supreme Court

Television and film
Latest action: action_date: 2013-02-28
text: Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. (text of measure as introduced: CR S1014-1015)

Summaries:
action_date: 2013-02-28
action_desc: Introduced in Senate
text: <p>Sunshine in the Courtroom Act of 2013 - Authorizes the presiding judge of a U.S. appellate court or U.S. district court to permit the photographing, electronic recording, broadcasting, or televising to the public of court proceedings over which that judge presides, except when such action would constitute a violation of the due process rights of any party.</p> <p>Directs: (1) a district court, upon the request of any witness in a trial proceeding other than a party, to order the face and voice of the witness to be disguised or otherwise obscured to render the witness unrecognizable to the broadcast audience of the trial proceeding; and (2) the presiding judge in a trial proceeding to inform each witness who is not a party of the right to make such request. Allows a presiding judge to obscure the face and voice of an individual if good cause is shown that photographing, electronic recording, broadcasting, or televising such features would threaten the individual's safety, the court's security, the integrity of future or ongoing law enforcement operations, or the interest of justice.</p> <p>Prohibits a presiding judge from permitting the photographing, electronic recording, broadcasting, or televising of any juror in a trial proceeding, or of the jury selection process. </p> <p>Terminates a district court's authority under this Act three years after enactment of this Act.</p> <p>Requires the Judicial Conference of the United States to promulgate mandatory guidelines which a presiding judge must follow for obscuring certain vulnerable witnesses. </p> <p>Prohibits any audio pickup or broadcast of conferences which occur in a court proceeding between attorneys and their clients, co-counsel of a client, adverse counsel, or counsel and the presiding judge, if the conferences are not part of the official record of the proceedings.</p>

tv_txt: II 113th CONGRESS 1st Session S. 405 IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES February 28, 2013 Mr. Grassley (for himself, Mr. Schumer , Mr. Leahy , Mr. Cornyn , Mr. Durbin , Ms. Klobuchar , and Mr. Blumenthal ) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary A BILL To provide for media coverage of Federal court proceedings.

1. Short title This Act may be cited as the Sunshine in the Courtroom Act of 2013 . 2. Federal appellate and district courts (a) Definitions In this section: (1) Presiding judge The term presiding judge means the judge presiding over the court proceeding concerned. In proceedings in which more than 1 judge participates, the presiding judge shall be the senior active judge so participating or, in the case of a circuit court of appeals, the senior active circuit judge so participating, except that— (A) in en banc sittings of any United States circuit court of appeals, the presiding judge shall be the chief judge of the circuit whenever the chief judge participates; and (B) in en banc sittings of the Supreme Court of the United States, the presiding judge shall be the Chief Justice whenever the Chief Justice participates. (2) Appellate court of the united states The term appellate court of the United States means any United States circuit court of appeals and the Supreme Court of the United States. (b) Authority of presiding judge To allow media coverage of court proceedings (1) Authority of appellate courts (A) In general Except as provided under subparagraph (B), the presiding judge of an appellate court of the United States may, at the discretion of that judge, permit the photographing, electronic recording, broadcasting, or televising to the public of any court proceeding over which that judge presides. (B) Exception The presiding judge shall not permit any action under subparagraph (A), if— (i) in the case of a proceeding involving only the presiding judge, that judge determines the action would constitute a violation of the due process rights of any party; or (ii) in the case of a proceeding involving the participation of more than 1 judge, a majority of the judges participating determine that the action would constitute a violation of the due process rights of any party. (2) Authority of district courts (A) In general (i) Authority Notwithstanding any other provision of law, except as provided under clause (iii), the presiding judge of a district court of the United States may, at the discretion of that judge, permit the photographing, electronic recording, broadcasting, or televising to the public of any court proceeding over which that judge presides. (ii) Obscuring of witnesses Except as provided under clause (iii)— (I) upon the request of any witness (other than a party) in a trial proceeding, the court shall order the face and voice of the witness to be disguised or otherwise obscured in such manner as to render the witness unrecognizable to the broadcast audience of the trial proceeding; and (II) the presiding judge in a trial proceeding shall inform each witness who is not a party that the witness has the right to request the image and voice of that witness to be obscured during the witness' testimony. (iii) Exception The presiding judge shall not permit any action under this subparagraph— (I) if that judge determines the action would constitute a violation of the due process rights of any party; and (II) until the Judicial Conference of the United States promulgates mandatory guidelines under paragraph (5). (B) No media coverage of jurors The presiding judge shall not permit the photographing, electronic recording, broadcasting, or televising of any juror in a trial proceeding, or of the jury selection process. (C) Discretion of the judge The presiding judge shall have the discretion to obscure the face and voice of an individual, if good cause is shown that the photographing, electronic recording, broadcasting, or televising of the individual would threaten— (i) the safety of the individual; (ii) the security of the court; (iii) the integrity of future or ongoing law enforcement operations; or (iv) the interest of justice. (D) Sunset of district court authority The authority under this paragraph shall terminate 3 years after the date of the enactment of this Act. (3) Interlocutory appeals barred The decision of the presiding judge under this subsection of whether or not to permit, deny, or terminate the photographing, electronic recording, broadcasting, or televising of a court proceeding may not be challenged through an interlocutory appeal. (4) Advisory Guidelines The Judicial Conference of the United States may promulgate advisory guidelines to which a presiding judge, at the discretion of that judge, may refer in making decisions with respect to the management and administration of photographing, recording, broadcasting, or televising described under paragraphs (1) and (2). (5) Mandatory guidelines Not later than 6 months after the date of enactment of this Act, the Judicial Conference of the United States shall promulgate mandatory guidelines which a presiding judge is required to follow for obscuring of certain vulnerable witnesses, including crime victims, minor victims, families of victims, cooperating witnesses, undercover law enforcement officers or agents, witnesses subject to section 3521 of title 18, United States Code, relating to witness relocation and protection, or minors under the age of 18 years. The guidelines shall include procedures for determining, at the earliest practicable time in any investigation or case, which witnesses should be considered vulnerable under this section. (6) Procedures In the interests of justice and fairness, the presiding judge of the court in which media use is desired has discretion to promulgate rules and disciplinary measures for the courtroom use of any form of media or media equipment and the acquisition or distribution of any of the images or sounds obtained in the courtroom. The presiding judge shall also have discretion to require written acknowledgment of the rules by anyone individually or on behalf of any entity before being allowed to acquire any images or sounds from the courtroom. (7) No broadcast of conferences between attorneys and clients There shall be no audio pickup or broadcast of conferences which occur in a court proceeding between attorneys and their clients, between co-counsel of a client, between adverse counsel, or between counsel and the presiding judge, if the conferences are not part of the official record of the proceedings. (8) Expenses A court may require that any accommodations to effectuate this Act be made without public expense. (9) Inherent authority Nothing in this Act shall limit the inherent authority of a court to protect witnesses or clear the courtroom to preserve the decorum and integrity of the legal process or protect the safety of an individual.