II Calendar No. 456 117th CONGRESS 2d Session S. 3317 IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES December 6, 2021 Mr. Coons (for himself and Mr. Graham ) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations July 21, 2022 Reported by Mr. Menendez , with an amendment Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert the part printed in italic A BILL To strengthen United States national security through the defense of democracy abroad and to address contemporary threats to democracy around the world, and for other purposes.

1. Short title; table of contents (a) Short title This Act may be cited as the Democracy in the 21st Century Act . (b) Table of contents The table of contents for this Act is as follows: Sec. 1. Short title; table of contents. Sec. 2. Definitions. Sec. 3. Program prioritization and democracy strategy. Sec. 4. Authorities and limitation. Sec. 5. Establishment of certain funds. Sec. 6. Roles and responsibilities. Sec. 7. Coordinators for democracy programs. Sec. 8. Authorization of appropriations. 2. Definitions In this Act: (1) Appropriate congressional committees The term appropriate congressional committees means— (A) the Committee on Appropriations of the Senate; (B) the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate; (C) the Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives; and (D) the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives. (2) Democracy programs For purposes of funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act, the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 ( 22 U.S.C. 2151 et seq. ), or appropriated under any Act making appropriations for the Department of State, foreign operations, and related programs, the term democracy programs means programs that— (A) support democratic governance consistent with section 133(b) of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 ( 22 U.S.C. 2152c(b) ), and— (i) transparent, accountable, and democratic governance (including combating corruption); (ii) credible and competitive elections; (iii) freedom of expression (including countering disinformation and misinformation), association, assembly, and religion; (iv) human rights and labor rights; (v) independent media; (vi) internet freedom and digital rights and responsibilities; and (vii) the rule of law; or (B) otherwise strengthen the capacity of democratic political parties, nongovernmental organizations and institutions, and citizens to support the development of democratic states and institutions that are responsive and accountable to citizens. (3) NED The term NED means the National Endowment for Democracy. (4) Relevant Federal agencies The term relevant Federal agencies means— (A) the Department of State; (B) the United States Agency for International Development; and (C) other Federal agencies that the President determines are relevant for purposes of this Act. (5) USAID The term USAID means the United States Agency for International Development. 3. Program prioritization and democracy strategy (a) Findings Congress makes the following findings: (1) Democracy has weakened around the world for at least 15 consecutive years. In some places, authoritarian leaders have deliberately chipped away at the pillars of democracy; in others, rampant partisanship and disinformation have pitted democratic electorates against themselves. In many places, the People’s Republic of China (PRC), the Federation of Russia, and other states have found ways to encourage or amplify these trends, including through the strategic use of corruption. (2) The erosion of global democracy fundamentally undermines the national security of the United States. Democracies consistently prove to be the most reliable geopolitical allies and trading partners for the United States. Democracies by any reasonable measure outperform non-democracies in delivering prosperity and good governance, and in preventing instability and violent extremism. The erosion of democracy in foreign countries threatens the United States at home, because the threats democracy faces around the world (including disinformation, hyperpolarization, election meddling, weaponized corruption, digital repression, and attacks on independent media) respect no national boundary. If left unaddressed overseas, this democratic erosion will threaten American democracy at home. (3) More generally, the competition between democracies and autocracies has again become an animating feature of global politics, with authoritarian powers (often with support from the PRC or Russia) using their resources, influence, and technology to undermine and interfere in democratic processes and co-opt public officials. (4) The current approach of the United States Government to supporting global democracy must be updated to meet today’s challenges. The survival of the democratic project will always depend on free and fair elections, strong democratic institutions, the rule of law, and an empowered civil society. The United States Government must also establish new authorities and resources to address contemporary threats to democracy, including malign foreign interference, transnational corruption, and digital authoritarianism. (b) Program prioritization The United States Government should prioritize democracy programs that— (1) advance democracy worldwide, including during a country’s transition to democracy, a consolidation of democracy following such a transition, and democratic backsliding in a country; (2) support democracy and democratic activists in closed and repressive societies, including defending their human rights; (3) counter the malign influence of the PRC, the Federation of Russia, and other authoritarian governments; (4) counter corruption and kleptocracy, including by enhancing transparent, accountable, and responsive governance; (5) promote and protect independent media, civil society activists, writers, artists, and intellectuals; (6) counter misinformation and disinformation of all kinds, but especially in the digital domain; (7) counter authoritarian abuse of technology, and prevent manipulation—especially through digital means—of elections, electoral data, and critical infrastructure; (8) combat digital authoritarianism, including the use of the internet and other digital technologies to undermine human rights; (9) promote internet freedom and the use of technology that furthers democracy and human rights; (10) counter transnational repression and the extra-territorial extension of repressive measures, as well as the increasing use of arbitrary detention; (11) respond rapidly to democratic openings or backsliding; (12) promote civic education, voter education, and enhanced citizen participation in democratic processes; (13) seek to ensure the integrity of elections abroad; and (14) establish and promote democracy partnerships to maximize support to a country where a democratic opening is underway or the respective government is a genuine partner for democratic reform. (c) Strategy Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the President shall submit to Congress a comprehensive strategy to promote democracy abroad. The strategy shall encompass a whole of government approach to such efforts, and include detailed information on funding, goals and objectives, and oversight. 4. Authorities and limitation (a) Availability Funds that are authorized to be appropriated pursuant to the National Endowment for Democracy Act ( 22 U.S.C. 4412 ) or appropriated under any Act making appropriations for the Department of State, foreign operations, and related programs for the National Endowment for Democracy may be made available notwithstanding any other provision of law and any regulation. (b) Beneficiaries Funds that are made available by this Act for the NED are made available pursuant to the authority of the National Endowment for Democracy Act (title V of Public Law 98–164 ), including all decisions regarding the selection of beneficiaries. (c) Restrictions on foreign government interference (1) Prior approval With respect to the provision of assistance for democracy programs by relevant Federal agencies, the organizations implementing such assistance, the specific nature of that assistance, and the participants in such programs shall not be subject to the prior approval by the government of any foreign country. (2) Disclosure of implementing partner information If the Secretary of State, in consultation with the Administrator of the United States Agency for International Development, determines that the government of a country is undemocratic or has engaged in gross violations of human rights, any new bilateral agreement governing the terms and conditions under which assistance is provided to such a country shall not require the disclosure of the names of implementing partners of democracy programs, and the Secretary of State and the Administrator of the United States Agency for International Development shall expeditiously seek to negotiate amendments to existing bilateral agreements, as necessary, to conform to this requirement. (3) Reporting requirement The Secretary of State, in coordination with the USAID Administrator, shall submit a report to the appropriate congressional committees, not later than January 31, 2022, and annually thereafter until September 30, 2026, detailing steps taken by the Department of State and USAID to comply with the requirements of this subsection. (d) Information sharing The Assistant Secretary for Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor of the Department of State and the Assistant Administrator for Development, Democracy, and Innovation of USAID shall regularly inform the NED of democracy programs that are planned and supported by such agencies, and the NED President shall regularly inform such Secretary and Administrator of programs that are planned and supported by the NED, consistent with the requirements of section 505 of the National Endowment for Democracy Act ( 22 U.S.C. 4414 ). (e) Digital security Democracy programs supported by funds authorized to be appropriated pursuant to section 8 should include a component on digital security to enhance the security and safety of implementers and beneficiaries, including, as appropriate, assistance for civil society organizations to counter government surveillance, censorship, and repression by digital means. 5. Establishment of certain funds (a) Fund To Defend Democracy Globally (1) Establishment The Secretary of State and the Administrator of the United States Agency for International Development, following consultation with the appropriate congressional committees, may each establish a Fund to Defend Democracy Globally, which may accept contributions from other international donors and the private sector. The Secretary and the Administrator shall regularly coordinate programs and activities supported by each respective Fund. (2) Purpose The purpose of such Funds is to support programs that— (A) strengthen and enhance the Department of State and USAID’s ability to respond quickly and flexibly to democratic openings and backsliding; (B) assist fledgling or struggling democracies deliver services and meet expectations for their populations through a full range of development assistance from the United States and other international donors, in consultation and coordination with the governments of such democracies, in order to further reforms and strategies identified by such governments through consultation with respective civil societies; (C) support, in cooperation with other international donors and in consultation with nongovernmental organizations, independent and public interest media worldwide to help such media resist the overlapping challenges of authoritarian encroachment, threats to their financial viability, and litigation and regulatory environments meant to undercut their ability to operate; (D) center democratic values and human rights in current and emerging technologies, and counter efforts by authoritarian governments to surveil, censor, or otherwise repress populations by digital means, including through programs that— (i) counter disinformation; (ii) establish an initiative to be housed at USAID to help countries around the world implement governing regulations for the procurement and use of technology consistent with democratic and human rights norms and standards; (iii) provide digital public goods to reduce the appeal of authoritarian-leaning technologies to cash-strapped countries; (iv) provide education on digital literacy to key populations; and (v) support the ongoing prioritization of democratic values in technological development in the years to come; and (E) establish an international coalition of governmental and nongovernmental actors dedicated to preserving election integrity by providing funds to deter or combat external influence in elections abroad, including cyber intrusion, disinformation, and other threats, and assist elections to meet coalition-defined standards of electoral integrity. (3) Authorization of appropriations Of the funds authorized to be appropriated pursuant to section 8, not less than $20,000,000, to remain available until expended, should be made available for each Fund established under this subsection. (b) Fund To combat corruption and kleptocracy (1) Establishment The USAID Administrator, following consultation with the appropriate congressional committees, may establish a Fund to Combat Corruption and Kleptocracy abroad. (2) Contributions The Fund may accept contributions from other international donors and the private sector, and provide contributions to multilateral organizations. (3) Purposes The purposes of the Fund are to support efforts by foreign governments, civil society, and the private sector to combat corruption and kleptocracy abroad, including through efforts that— (A) enhance government transparency, accountability, and responsiveness across development sectors; (B) improve detection and exposure of corruption crimes, including those that cross borders; (C) expand investigations and prosecutions of corrupt acts and hold corrupt actors accountable; (D) strengthen norms and standards at the local, national, regional, and international levels; and (E) augment cooperation with the private sector and key industries to root out corruption that harms competitiveness, economic growth, and development and taints critical supply chains. (4) Authorization of appropriations Of the funds authorized to be appropriated pursuant to section 8, not less than $20,000,000, to remain available until expended, should be made available for the Fund. (c) Democracy Research and Development Fund (1) Establishment The Administrator of the United States Agency for International Development, following consultation with the appropriate congressional committees, may establish a Democracy Research and Development Fund. (2) Contributions The Fund may accept contributions from other international donors and the private sector, and provide contributions to multilateral organizations. (3) Purposes The purposes of the Fund are to— (A) support research and development by the Department of State, USAID, and NED on policies, programs, and technologies relating to democracy promotion abroad; (B) drive innovation within those entities regarding the response to democratic backsliding; and (C) incentivize collaboration among government, nongovernmental organizations, and the private sector with the objective of identifying and mitigating the threats to global democracy. (4) Reports from the Coordinators for Democracy Programs and the National Endowment for Democracy Not later than 180 days after enactment of this Act, and annually thereafter until September 30, 2026, the Coordinators for Democracy Programs established pursuant to section 7 and the President of the National Endowment for Democracy shall each submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report detailing research and development programs supported by the Department of State, USAID, and NED during the prior fiscal year. The report may be accompanied by a classified annex, if necessary. (5) Authorization of appropriations Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by section 8, $15,000,000, to remain available until expended, should be made available for the Fund. 6. Roles and responsibilities Funds authorized to be appropriated pursuant to section 8 should be made available as follows, consistent with the overall strategic direction and capabilities of the Department of State and USAID: (1) For the Department of State, such funds should be the responsibility of the Assistant Secretary of State for Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor, except for funds provided to NED. Such funds shall be made available as grants and should have as their primary purpose democracy programs that are flexible, innovative, and responsive to— (A) current human rights abuses and democracy deficiencies as documented in the annual Country Report on Human Rights Practices required by sections 116(d) and 502B(b) of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 ( 22 U.S.C. 2151n(d) , 2304(b)); and (B) emerging opportunities and sudden crises. (2) For USAID, such funds should have as their primary purpose flexible, innovative, and responsive democracy programs that are development-oriented, often coordinated through a Country Development Cooperation Strategy, and conducted in countries where a USAID Mission is present or where a USAID Mission in a neighboring country can run such programs effectively. Such programs should, as appropriate, build local capacity with an eye to persistent multi-year efforts, incorporate democracy programming into a larger development strategy, and emphasize locally led programs when possible. Funds made available for civil society and political competition and consensus building programs abroad shall be provided in a manner that recognizes the benefits of grants and cooperative agreements in implementing such programs. (3) In cases where both the Department of State and USAID are able to respond to emerging opportunities and sudden crises, including in closed and repressive societies, the Coordinators of Democracy Programs established pursuant to section 7 shall coordinate their respective programs, including at the country level, to ensure complementarity and prevent waste or redundancy. 7. Coordinators for democracy programs The Assistant Secretary of State for Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor of the Department of State and the Assistant Administrator for Development, Democracy, and Innovation shall serve concurrently as the Coordinators for Democracy Programs, and as Coordinators shall— (1) coordinate democracy policy and programs across relevant Federal agencies, at diplomatic facilities abroad, and with the NED regarding the safety, efficacy, and best practices of democracy programs abroad; (2) engage international partners, including foreign governments, civil society, and democracy activists, in addressing the advancement of democracy abroad; and (3) serve as the primary United States representatives at international fora on matters relating to democracy programs. 8. Authorization of appropriations (a) Democracy programs There are authorized to be appropriated for democracy programs in each of fiscal years 2022, 2023, 2024, 2025, and 2026, to remain available until expended, $3,000,000,000, including for new Presidential initiatives regarding democracy promotion abroad. (b) Administration of department of state democracy programs Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this section that are made available for the Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor of the Department of State, up to 15 percent may be made available for the administration of democracy programs by such Bureau in each of fiscal years 2022, 2023, 2024, 2025, and 2026, including for the hiring of additional personnel following consultation with the appropriate congressional committees. Such funds are in addition to funds otherwise made available for such purposes. (c) Administration of USAID democracy programs Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this section that are made available for the Bureau for Development, Democracy, and Innovation, USAID, up to 15 percent may be made available for the administration of democracy programs by such Bureau in each of fiscal years 2022, 2023, 2024, 2025, and 2026, including for the hiring of additional personnel following consultation with the appropriate congressional committees. Such funds are in addition to funds otherwise made available for such purposes.

1. Short title; table of contents (a) Short title This Act may be cited as the Madeleine K. Albright Democracy in the 21st Century Act . (b) Table of contents The table of contents for this Act is as follows: Sec. 1. Short title; table of contents. Sec. 2. Definitions. Sec. 3. Program prioritization and democracy strategy. Sec. 4. Authorities and limitation. Sec. 5. Establishment of the Democracy in the 21st Century Fund. Sec. 6. Roles and responsibilities. Sec. 7. Authorization of appropriations. 2. Definitions In this Act: (1) Appropriate congressional committees The term appropriate congressional committees means— (A) the Committee on Appropriations of the Senate; (B) the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate; (C) the Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives; and (D) the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives. (2) Civil and political rights The term civil and political rights means the equal and inalienable rights of all members of the human family as provided for in the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, done in New York December 16, 1966. (3) Democracy programs For purposes of funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act, the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 ( 22 U.S.C. 2151 et seq. ), or appropriated under any Act making appropriations for the Department of State, foreign operations, and related programs, the term democracy programs means programs that, consistent with section 133(b) of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 ( 22 U.S.C. 2152c(b) ) and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, done at New York December 16, 1966, support— (A) good governance; (B) credible and competitive elections; (C) freedom of expression, association, assembly, and religion; (D) human rights, labor rights, independent media, and the rule of law; and (E) otherwise strengthen the capacity of democratic political parties, governments, nongovernmental organizations and institutions, and citizens to support the development of democratic states and institutions that are responsive and accountable to citizens. (4) NED The term NED means the National Endowment for Democracy. (5) Relevant Federal departments and agencies The term relevant Federal departments and agencies means— (A) the Department of State; (B) the United States Agency for International Development; and (C) other Federal agencies that the President determines are relevant for purposes of this Act. (6) USAID The term USAID means the United States Agency for International Development. 3. Program prioritization and democracy strategy (a) Program prioritization As the global leader in promoting and advancing democratic principles, the United States Government should prioritize democracy programs that— (1) align and are coordinated with diplomatic and security strategies for a given country or region; (2) advance democracy worldwide, including during a country’s transition to democracy and the consolidation of democracy following such a transition, and address democratic backsliding in a country; (3) support democracy and democratic voices in closed and repressive societies, including those defending the exercise of civil and political rights; (4) counter the malign influence of the People’s Republic of China, the Russian Federation, and other authoritarian governments; (5) counter corruption and kleptocracy, including by enhancing transparent, accountable, and responsive governance; (6) promote and protect independent media, civil society activists, writers, artists, and intellectuals; (7) counter misinformation and disinformation, but especially in the digital domain; (8) counter authoritarian abuse of technology, and prevent manipulation—especially through digital means—of elections, electoral data, and critical electoral infrastructure; (9) combat digital authoritarianism, including the use of the internet and other digital technologies to restrict the exercise of civil and political rights; (10) promote internet freedom and the use of technology that furthers democracy and the exercise of civil and political rights; (11) counter transnational repression and the extra-territorial extension of repressive measures, as well as the increasing use of arbitrary detention; (12) respond rapidly to democratic openings or backsliding, and adapt to evolving dynamics on the ground; (13) promote civic education, voter education, and enhanced citizen participation in democratic processes; (14) protect the civil and political rights of religious and ethnic minorities; (15) seek to ensure the integrity of elections abroad; and (16) establish and promote democracy partnerships to maximize support to a country where a democratic opening is underway or the respective government is a genuine partner for democratic reform. (b) Strategy Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the President shall submit to Congress a comprehensive strategy to promote democracy abroad that is informed by extensive consultations with the local actors impacted by such programs. The strategy shall encompass a whole of government approach to such efforts, and include detailed information on funding, goals and objectives, and oversight. 4. Authorities and limitation (a) Beneficiaries Funds that are made available by this Act for the National Endowment for Democracy are made available pursuant to the authority of the National Endowment for Democracy Act (title V of Public Law 98–164 ), including all decisions regarding the selection of beneficiaries. (b) Restrictions on foreign government interference (1) Prior approval With respect to the provision of assistance for democracy programs by relevant Federal departments and agencies, the organizations implementing such assistance, the specific nature of that assistance, and the participants in such programs shall not be subject to the prior approval by the government of any foreign country. (2) Disclosure of implementing partner information If the Secretary of State, in consultation with the Administrator of the United States Agency for International Development, determines that the government of a country is undemocratic or has engaged in gross violations of civil and political rights, any new bilateral agreement governing the terms and conditions under which assistance is provided to such a country shall not require the disclosure of the names of implementing partners of democracy programs, and the Secretary of State and the USAID Administrator shall expeditiously seek to negotiate amendments to existing bilateral agreements, as necessary, to conform to this requirement. (3) Reporting requirement The Secretary of State, in coordination with the USAID Administrator, shall submit a report to the appropriate congressional committees, not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, and annually thereafter until September 30, 2026, detailing steps taken by the Department of State and USAID to comply with the requirements of this subsection. (c) Protecting implementing partners (1) In general Where it is determined by the Secretary of State, in consultation with the USAID Administrator, or the NED President, as appropriate, that a country is undemocratic or has engaged in gross violations of civil and political rights, the names of implementing persons and organizations of democracy activities and programs supported by the Department of State, USAID, or NED shall not be required under section 552 of title 5, United States Code (commonly referred to as the Freedom of Information Act ). (2) Reporting requirement Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the NED President shall submit a report to the appropriate committees on the uses of the authority provided in paragraph (1) on a case-by-case basis, which shall be updated every 180 days thereafter. (d) Information sharing The Secretary of State and the USAID Administrator shall regularly inform the NED President of democracy programs that are planned and supported by such agencies, and the NED President shall regularly inform such Secretary and Administrator of programs that are planned and supported by the NED, consistent with the requirements of section 505(b) of the National Endowment for Democracy Act ( 22 U.S.C. 4414(b) ). (e) Digital security Democracy programs supported by funds authorized to be appropriated pursuant to section 7 should include a component on digital security to enhance the security and safety of implementers and beneficiaries, including, as appropriate, assistance for civil society organizations to counter government surveillance, censorship, and repression by digital means. (f) Audits Section 504(g) of the National Endowment for Democracy Act ( 22 U.S.C. 4413(g) ) is amended by striking United States Information Agency and inserting Department of State Office of Inspector General . 5. Establishment of the Democracy in the 21st Century Fund (a) Establishment There is established in the Treasury of the United States a fund to be known as the Democracy in the 21st Century Fund (in this subsection referred to as the Fund ), to be administered by the Secretary of State, following consultation with the Administrator of the United States Agency for International Development and the appropriate congressional committees, consisting of amounts authorized to be appropriated by section 7, to advance the comprehensive strategy under section 3, including the programs of the Department of State, USAID, and the National Endowment for Democracy described in subsections (b), (c), (d), and (e). (b) Defending democracy globally The Secretary of State, in coordination with the USAID Administrator and in consultation with the appropriate congressional committees, shall establish a program to defend democracy globally by— (1) strengthening and enhancing the Department of State and USAID’s ability to respond quickly and flexibly to democratic openings and backsliding; (2) assisting fledgling or struggling democracies deliver services and meet expectations for their populations, in consultation and coordination with the governments of such democracies, in order to further reforms and strategies identified by such governments through consultation with respective civil societies; (3) supporting, in cooperation with other international donors and in consultation with nongovernmental organizations, independent and public interest media worldwide to help such media resist the overlapping challenges of authoritarian encroachment, threats to their financial viability, and litigation and regulatory environments meant to undercut their ability to operate; (4) centering democratic values and the promotion of civil and political rights in current and emerging technologies, and countering efforts by authoritarian governments to surveil, censor, or otherwise repress populations by digital means, including through programs that— (A) counter disinformation; (B) establish an initiative to help countries around the world implement governing regulations for the procurement and use of technology consistent with civil and political rights; (C) provide digital public goods to reduce the appeal of authoritarian-leaning technologies to cash strapped countries; (D) provide education on digital literacy to key populations; and (E) support the ongoing prioritization of democratic values in technological development in the years to come; (5) establishing international coalitions of governmental and nongovernmental actors dedicated to coordinating messaging, technical assistance programming, and rules-based governance approaches related to issues that impact democracy, particularly coalitions focused on— (A) preserving election integrity by assisting elections to meet coalition-defined standards of electoral integrity and deterring or combating external influence in elections abroad, including cyber intrusion, disinformation, and other threats; and (B) protecting supply chains from being tainted by the products of forced labor; and (6) supporting human rights defenders, democracy advocates at risk, writers, artists, and others who were forced to flee repression in their home countries so that they can safely continue their activism in exile. (c) Combating corruption and kleptocracy The Secretary of State, in coordination with the USAID Administrator and in consultation with the appropriate congressional committees, shall establish a program to support efforts by foreign governments, civil society, and the private sector to combat corruption and kleptocracy abroad, including through efforts that— (1) enhance government transparency, accountability, and responsiveness across relevant sectors; (2) improve detection and exposure of corruption crimes, including those that cross borders, improve citizen oversight and advocacy, protect free expression and civic activism, and bolster investigative journalism and media independence; (3) expand investigations and prosecutions of corrupt acts and hold corrupt actors accountable, and assist in the adoption and implementation of anticorruption preventive measures and promotion of good governance and public administration; (4) build effective, impartial judiciaries; (5) address corruption in key sectors, whether at the level of delivery of services to citizens, important governmental processes such as procurement, or priority economic sectors; (6) strengthen democratic norms and standards at the local, national, regional, and international levels; (7) augment cooperation with the private sector and key industries to root out corruption that harms competitiveness, economic growth, and development and taints critical supply chains; (8) strengthen cross-sectoral collaboration among nongovernmental organizations essential to combatting well-resourced transnational kleptocratic networks; (9) address corrosive capital and the strategic use of corruption by authoritarian states to undermine democracy and good governance; (10) provide essential skills and resources to civil society and media to counter corruption and address the weak governance and poor human rights conditions that cultivate corruption; and (11) foster public demand for accountable and transparent government. (d) Democracy research and development The Secretary of State, in consultation with the USAID Administrator and in consultation with the appropriate congressional committees, shall establish a program for democracy research and development that— (1) supports research and development by the Department of State, USAID, and the NED on policies, programs, and technologies relating to democracy programs; (2) drives innovation within those entities regarding the response to complex, multidimensional challenges to democracy, including combatting transnational kleptocracy, mitigating hyper-polarization, countering malign authoritarian influence, and leveraging emerging technology for democracy; (3) incentivizes collaboration among government, nongovernmental organizations, and the private sector with the objective of identifying and mitigating threats to global democracy; and (4) identifies lessons learned and best practices for democracy programs and diplomatic approaches to create feedback loops and shape future evidence-based programming and diplomacy. (e) Fellowships for democracy advocates at risk The NED is authorized to expand the Reagan-Fascell Democracy Fellows Program to provide additional fellowships, including in partnership with other institutions and organizations, to support democracy advocates at risk. (f) Leveraging Pursuant to sections 607 and 632 of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (22 17 U.S.C. 2357 , 2392), and after consultation with the appropriate congressional committees, the Secretary of State is authorized to establish mechanisms under the Fund to partner with other donors and private sector partners to carry out the purposes of this section. (g) Funding transparency Concurrent with the submission of the report required by section 653(a) of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 ( 22 U.S.C. 2413(a) ), the Secretary of State shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a detailed accounting of any funds programmed pursuant to the authorities under subsection (f) during the prior fiscal year. (h) Notification requirements Not later than 15 days prior to the obligation of funds authorized to be appropriated for the Fund and the programs established under this section, the Secretary of State and the USAID Administrator, as appropriate, shall notify the appropriate congressional committees of the intended uses of such funds. (i) Reporting requirement Not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, and annually thereafter through fiscal year 2027, the Secretary of State, the USAID Administrator, and the NED President, as appropriate, shall submit reports to the appropriate congressional committees detailing the uses of funds made available to the Fund pursuant to this Act. 6. Roles and responsibilities Funds authorized to be appropriated pursuant to section 7 should be made available as follows, consistent with the overall strategic direction and capabilities of the Department of State and the United States Agency for International Development: (1) For the Department of State, such funds should be the responsibility of the Assistant Secretary of State for Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor, except for funds provided to the NED. Such funds shall be made available as grants and should have as their primary purpose democracy programs that are incorporated into a larger diplomatic strategy and are flexible, innovative, and responsive to— (A) current human rights abuses and democracy deficiencies as documented in the annual Country Report on Human Rights Practices required by sections 116(d) and 502B(b) of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 ( 22 U.S.C. 2151n(d) , 2304(b)); and (B) emerging opportunities and sudden crises. (2) For USAID, such funds should have as their primary purpose flexible, innovative, and responsive democracy programs that are development-oriented, often coordinated through a Country Development Cooperation Strategy, and conducted in countries where a USAID Mission is present or a where a USAID Mission in a neighboring country can manage and oversee such programs effectively. Such programs should, as appropriate, build enduring local capacity, incorporate democracy programming into a larger development and diplomatic strategy, and emphasize participatory and locally led programs when possible. Funds made available for civil society and political competition and consensus building programs abroad shall be provided in a manner that recognizes the benefits of grants and cooperative agreements in implementing such programs. (3) In cases where both the Department of State and USAID are able to respond to emerging opportunities and sudden crises, including in closed and repressive societies, the Secretary of State and the USAID Administrator shall coordinate their respective programs, including at the country level, to ensure complementarity and prevent waste or redundancy. 7. Authorization of appropriations (a) Programs (1) In general There is authorized to be appropriated for the democracy programs of the Department of State and the United States Agency for International Development in each of fiscal years 2023 through 2027, $2,900,000,000, to remain available until expended. (2) Democracy in the 21st Century Fund Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by paragraph (1), the following amounts are authorized to be appropriated in each of fiscal years 2023 through 2027 for the Democracy in the 21st Century Fund established under section 5: (A) $20,000,000 in each such fiscal year is authorized to be appropriated for the Defending Democracy Globally program under section 5(b), of which not more than $10,000,000 may be administered by the USAID Administrator. (B) $50,000,000 in each such fiscal year is authorized to be appropriated for the Combating Corruption and Kleptocracy program under section 5(c). (C) $15,000,000 in each such fiscal year is authorized to be appropriated for the Democracy Research and Development program under section 5(d), which shall be allocated equally between the Department of State, USAID, and the National Endowment for Democracy. (D) $5,000,000 in each such fiscal year is authorized to be appropriated for the Reagan-Fascell Democracy Fellows Program for additional fellowships for democracy advocates at risk. (3) Democracy Fund (A) In general Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by paragraph (1), there is authorized to be appropriated $340,700,000 for each of fiscal years 2023 through 2027 to carry out activities under part 1 and chapter 4 of part II of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 ( 22 U.S.C. 2151 et seq. , 22 U.S.C. 2346 et seq. ) and paragraphs (3) and (5) of section 502(b) of the National Endowment for Democracy Act ( 22 U.S.C. 4411(b) ), for the promotion of democracy globally, which shall be made available to the Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor of the Department of State and the Bureau for Development, Democracy, and Innovation of the United States Agency for International Development. (B) Additional amounts Funds authorized to be made available to the National Endowment for Democracy and its core institutes under this paragraph are in addition to amounts otherwise authorized to be appropriated by this Act for such purposes. (b) Restrictions Federal funds made available to any individual, private entity, or any other nonprofit organization pursuant to this Act shall be subject to the restrictions and prohibitions of section 1352 of title 31, United States Code. (c) Administration of Department of State democracy programs Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this section that are made available for the Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor of the Department of State, up to 15 percent may be made available for the administration of democracy programs by such Bureau in each of fiscal years 2023 through 2027, including for the hiring of additional personnel following consultation with the appropriate congressional committees. Such funds are in addition to funds otherwise made available for such purposes. (d) Administration of USAID democracy programs Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this section that are made available for USAID, up to 15 percent may be made available for the administration of democracy programs by the agency in each of fiscal years 2023 through 2027, including for the hiring of additional personnel following consultation with the appropriate congressional committees. Such funds are in addition to funds otherwise made available for such purposes. (e) National Endowment for Democracy In addition to amounts authorized to be appropriated under subsection (a), there are authorized to be appropriated for NED $325,000,000 for fiscal year 2023, $350,000,000 for fiscal year 2024, $375,000,000 for fiscal year 2025, $400,000,000 for fiscal year 2026, and $425,000,000 for fiscal year 2027, including amounts to be allocated in the traditional and customary manner, to counter transnational threats to democracy, as well as to support and sustain democratic growth abroad, consistent with section 503 of the National Endowment for Democracy Act ( 22 U.S.C. 4412 ).

July 21, 2022 Reported with an amendment