I 116th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 358 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES January 9, 2019 Mr. Vargas introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources , and in addition to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure , for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned A BILL To direct the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency to establish a California New River restoration program to build on, and help coordinate funding for, restoration and protection efforts relating to the New River, and for other purposes.

1. Short title This Act may be cited as the California New River Restoration Act of 2019 . 2. Findings Congress finds that— (1) the New River was born out of the Colorado River’s occasional flows into the Salton Sink and the erosion of the New River channel which formed the deep river canyon between 1905 and 1907; (2) the New River starts in Mexicali, Mexico, flows north into the United States through Calexico, passes through the Imperial Valley and drains into the Salton Sea, roughly 66 miles north of the international boundary, and the sub-watershed covers approximately 750 square miles, with 63 percent of that in Mexico and 37 percent in the United States; (3) the New River has been widely recognized for its significant water pollution problems, primarily because of agricultural runoff, raw sewage, pesticides, and discharges of wastes from domestic, agricultural, and industrial sources in Mexico and the Imperial Valley; (4) by the 1980s, the New River acquired the reputation of being one of the most polluted rivers in the United States, with many of the pollutants posing serious human health hazards to local populations, particularly those in Calexico and Mexicali; (5) in 1992, the International Boundary Water Commission’s Treaty Minute No. 288 established a sanitation strategy for the New River water quality problems at the international boundary and divided the sanitation projects into two immediate repairs projects, the Mexicali I and the Mexicali II, which totaled about $50 million dollars and were funded by both countries through the North American Development Bank; (6) in 1995, the Environmental Protection Agency provided funds to the California Regional Water Quality Control Board to monitor and document the water quality at the international boundary on a monthly basis; (7) in the late 1990s, the United States and Mexico spent $100 million (45 percent paid by Mexico and 55 percent paid by the United States) to build the Las Arenitas and Zaragoza Wastewater Treatment plants, and untreated New River water passing through four microbial treatment cells at Las Arenitas was then chlorinated and fed into a re-forestation project along the desiccated Rio Hardy which stretches to the Sea of Cortez; (8) a 10-year effort by community groups, lawyers, regulatory agencies, and politicians addressed the problem at the source by federally funding a new sewage treatment plant in Mexicali and developing a site plan for the river on the United States side; (9) in 2009, the State of California required the California-Mexico Border Relations Council to create a strategic plan to study, monitor, remediate, and enhance the New River’s water quality to protect human health and develop a river parkway suitable for public use; (10) in 2012, the California-Mexico Border Relations Council approved the strategic plan for the New River Improvement Project prepared by the New River Improvement Project Technical Advisory Committee; (11) in 2016, the New River Improvement Project Technical Advisory Committee revised the recommended infrastructure of the New River Improvement Project, and the State of California appropriated $1.4 million to provide grants or contracts to implement the necessary planning, design, environmental review, and permitting work; (12) the revised New River Improvement Project includes the installation of a large trash screen, a conveyance system, aeration devices, a new pump station and managed wetlands; and (13) the existing and ongoing voluntary conservation efforts at the New River necessitate improved efficiency and cost effectiveness, as well as increased private-sector investments and coordination of Federal and non-Federal resources. 3. Definitions In this Act: (1) Administrator The term Administrator means the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency. (2) Mexican The term Mexican refers to the Federal, State, and local governments of the United Mexican States. (3) New River The term New River means the river that starts in Mexicali, Mexico, flows north into the United States through Calexico, passes through the Imperial Valley, and drains into the Salton Sea. (4) Program The term program means the California New River restoration program established under section 4. (5) Restoration and protection The term restoration and protection means the conservation, stewardship, and enhancement of habitat for fish and wildlife to preserve and improve ecosystems and ecological processes on which they depend. 4. California New River restoration program establishment (a) Establishment Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Administrator shall establish a program to be known as the California New River restoration program . (b) Duties In carrying out the program, the Administrator shall— (1) implement projects, plans, and initiatives for the New River supported by the California-Mexico Border Relations Council, and work in consultation with applicable management entities, including representatives of the Calexico New River Committee, the California-Mexico Border Relations Council, the New River Improvement Project Technical Advisory Committee, the Federal Government, State and local governments, and regional and nonprofit organizations, to implement restoration and protection activities relating to the New River; (2) undertake activities that— (A) support the implementation of a shared set of science-based restoration and protection activities identified in accordance with paragraph (1); (B) target cost-effective projects with measurable results; and (C) maximize conservation outcomes with no net gain of Federal full-time equivalent employees; and (3) provide grants and technical assistance in accordance with section 5. (c) Coordination In establishing the program, the Administrator shall consult, as appropriate, with— (1) the heads of Federal agencies, including— (A) the Secretary of the Interior; (B) the Secretary of Agriculture; (C) the Secretary of Homeland Security; (D) the Administrator of General Services; (E) the Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection; (F) the Commissioner of the International Boundary Water Commission; and (G) the head of any other applicable agency; (2) the Governor of California; (3) the California Environmental Protection Agency; (4) the California State Water Resources Control Board; (5) the California Department of Water Resources; (6) the Colorado River Basin Regional Water Quality Control Board; (7) the Imperial Irrigation District; and (8) other public agencies and organizations with authority for the planning and implementation of conservation strategies relating to the New River in both the United States and Mexico. (d) Purposes The purposes of the program include— (1) coordinating restoration and protection activities, among Mexican, Federal, State, local, and regional entities and conservation partners, relating to the New River; and (2) carrying out coordinated restoration and protection activities, and providing for technical assistance relating to the New River— (A) to sustain and enhance fish and wildlife habitat restoration and protection activities; (B) to improve and maintain water quality to support fish and wildlife, as well as the habitats of fish and wildlife; (C) to sustain and enhance water management for volume and flood damage mitigation improvements to benefit fish and wildlife habitat; (D) to improve opportunities for public access to, and recreation in and along, the New River consistent with the ecological needs of fish and wildlife habitat; (E) to maximize the resilience of natural systems and habitats under changing watershed conditions; (F) to engage the public through outreach, education, and citizen involvement, to increase capacity and support for coordinated restoration and protection activities relating to the New River; (G) to increase scientific capacity to support the planning, monitoring, and research activities necessary to carry out coordinated restoration and protection activities; and (H) to provide technical assistance to carry out restoration and protection activities relating to the New River. 5. Grants and assistance (a) In general In carrying out the program, the Administrator shall provide grants and technical assistance to State and local governments, nonprofit organizations, and institutions of higher education, in both the United States and Mexico, to carry out the purposes of the program. (b) Criteria The Administrator, in consultation with the organizations described in section 4(c), shall develop criteria for providing grants and technical assistance under this section to ensure that such activities accomplish one or more of the purposes identified in section 4(d)(2) and advance the implementation of priority actions or needs identified in the New River-wide strategy adopted under section 4(b)(2). (c) Cost sharing (1) Federal share The Federal share of the cost of a project for which a grant is provided under this section shall not exceed 55 percent of the total cost of the activity, as determined by the Administrator. (2) Non-Federal share The non-Federal share of the cost of a project for which a grant is provided under this section may be provided in the form of an in-kind contribution of services or materials. (d) Administration (1) In general The Administrator may enter into an agreement to manage the implementation of this section with the North American Development Bank or a similar organization that offers grant management services. (2) Funding If the Administrator enters into an agreement under paragraph (1), the organization selected shall— (A) for each fiscal year, receive amounts to carry out this section in an advance payment of the entire amount on October 1, or as soon as practicable thereafter, of that fiscal year; (B) invest and reinvest those amounts for the benefit of the program; and (C) otherwise administer the implementation of this section to support partnerships between the public and private sectors in accordance with this Act. 6. Annual reports Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, and annually thereafter, the Administrator shall submit to Congress a report on the implementation of this Act, including a description of each project that has received funding under this Act and the status of all such projects that are in progress on the date of submission of the report.