IB Union Calendar No. 126 114th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 2042 [Report No. 114–171] IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES April 28, 2015 Mr. Whitfield (for himself, Mr. Griffith , Mr. Bishop of Georgia , and Mr. Peterson ) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce June 19, 2015 Additional sponsors: Ms. Sewell of Alabama , Mr. Latta , Mr. McKinley , Mr. Guthrie , Mr. Sessions , Mrs. Ellmers of North Carolina , Mr. Duncan of Tennessee , Mr. Stivers , Mr. Mullin , Mr. Cramer , Mr. Barr , Mr. Gibbs , Mr. Murphy of Pennsylvania , Mr. Jones , Mr. Brooks of Alabama , Mr. Byrne , Mr. Rogers of Alabama , Mr. Kelly of Pennsylvania , Mr. DeSantis , Mr. Bost , Mr. Crawford , Mrs. Hartzler , Mr. Collins of New York , Mr. Rouzer , Mr. Forbes , Mr. Jenkins of West Virginia , Mrs. Black , Mr. Long , Mrs. Lummis , Mr. DesJarlais , Mrs. Wagner , Mr. Stewart , Mr. Harper , Mr. Womack , Mr. Roe of Tennessee , Mr. Flores , Mr. Johnson of Ohio , Mr. Kline , Ms. Jenkins of Kansas , Mr. Palazzo , Mr. Hudson , Mr. Babin , Mr. Abraham , Mr. Tipton , Mr. Zinke , Mr. Sensenbrenner , Mr. Bridenstine , Mr. McCaul , Mr. Bilirakis , Mr. Ribble , Mrs. Brooks of Indiana , Mrs. Roby , Mr. Barton , Mr. Shuster , Mr. Jolly , Mr. Ashford , Mr. Luetkemeyer , Mr. Carter of Georgia , Mr. Smith of Texas , Mr. Crenshaw , Mr. Lamborn , Mrs. Love , Mr. Loudermilk , and Ms. McSally June 19, 2015 Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union and ordered to be printed A BILL To allow for judicial review of any final rule addressing carbon dioxide emissions from existing fossil fuel-fired electric utility generating units before requiring compliance with such rule, and to allow States to protect households and businesses from significant adverse effects on electricity ratepayers or reliability.

1. Short title This Act may be cited as the Ratepayer Protection Act of 2015 . 2. Extending compliance dates of rules addressing carbon dioxide emissions from existing power plants pending judicial review (a) Extension of compliance dates (1) Extension Each compliance date of any final rule described in subsection (b) is deemed to be extended by the time period equal to the time period described in subsection (c). (2) Definition In this subsection, the term compliance date — (A) means, with respect to any requirement of a final rule described in subsection (b), the date by which any State, local, or tribal government or other person is first required to comply; and (B) includes the date by which State plans are required to be submitted to the Environmental Protection Agency under any such final rule. (b) Final rules described A final rule described in this subsection is any final rule to address carbon dioxide emissions from existing sources that are fossil fuel-fired electric utility generating units under section 111(d) of the Clean Air Act ( 42 U.S.C. 7411(d) ), including any final rule that succeeds— (1) the proposed rule entitled Carbon Pollution Emission Guidelines for Existing Stationary Sources: Electric Utility Generating Units published at 79 Fed. Reg. 34830 (June 18, 2014); or (2) the supplemental proposed rule entitled Carbon Pollution Emission Guidelines for Existing Stationary Sources: EGUs in Indian Country and U.S. Territories; Multi-Jurisdictional Partnerships published at 79 Fed. Reg. 65482 (November 4, 2014). (c) Period described The time period described in this subsection is the period of days that— (1) begins on the date that is 60 days after the day on which notice of promulgation of a final rule described in subsection (b) appears in the Federal Register; and (2) ends on the date on which judgment becomes final, and no longer subject to further appeal or review, in all actions (including actions that are filed pursuant to section 307 of the Clean Air Act ( 42 U.S.C. 7607 ))— (A) that are filed during the 60 days described in paragraph (1); and (B) that seek review of any aspect of such rule. 3. Ratepayer protection (a) Effects of plans No State shall be required to adopt or submit a State plan, and no State or entity within a State shall become subject to a Federal plan, pursuant to any final rule described in section 2(b), if the Governor of such State makes a determination, and notifies the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, that implementation of the State or Federal plan would— (1) have a significant adverse effect on the State’s residential, commercial, or industrial ratepayers, taking into account— (A) rate increases that would be necessary to implement, or are associated with, the State or Federal plan; and (B) other rate increases that have been or are anticipated to be necessary to implement, or are associated with, other Federal or State environmental requirements; or (2) have a significant adverse effect on the reliability of the State’s electricity system, taking into account the effects on the State’s— (A) existing and planned generation and retirements; (B) existing and planned transmission and distribution infrastructure; and (C) projected electricity demands. (b) Consultation In making a determination under subsection (a), the Governor of a State shall consult with— (1) the public utility commission or public service commission of the State; (2) the environmental protection, public health, and economic development departments or agencies of the State; and (3) the Electric Reliability Organization (as defined in section 215 of the Federal Power Act ( 16 U.S.C. 824o )).

June 19, 2015 Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union and ordered to be printed