hyperdemocracy/usc-textversion huggingface dataset:
I 114th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 1074 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES February 25, 2015 Ms. Gabbard (for herself, Mr. Young of Alaska , and Mr. Takai ) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Homeland Security A BILL To amend title 49, United States Code, to exempt certain flights from increased aviation security service fees.

1. Short title This Act may be cited as the Passenger Fee Restructuring Exemptions Act of 2015 . 2. Exceptions to restructuring of passenger fee (a) In general Section 44940(c) of title 49, United States Code, is amended— (1) in paragraph (1), by striking Fees imposed and inserting Except as provided by paragraph (2), fees imposed ; (2) by redesignating paragraph (2) as paragraph (3); and (3) by inserting after paragraph (1) the following: (2) Exceptions Fees imposed under subsection (a)(1) may not exceed $2.50 per enplanement, and the total amount of such fees may not exceed $5.00 per one-way trip, for passengers— (A) boarding to an eligible place under subchapter II of chapter 417 for which essential air service compensation is paid under that subchapter; or (B) on flights, including flight segments, between 2 or more points in Hawaii or 2 or more points in Alaska. . (b) Implementation of fee exceptions The Secretary of Homeland Security shall implement the fee exceptions under the amendments made by subsection (a)— (1) beginning on the date that is 30 days after the date of the enactment of this Act; and (2) through the publication of notice of the fee exceptions in the Federal Register, notwithstanding section 9701 of title 31, United States Code, and the procedural requirements of section 553 of title 5, United States Code.
I 114th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 1075 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES AN ACT To designate the United States Customs and Border Protection Port of Entry located at First Street and Pan American Avenue in Douglas, Arizona, as the Raul Hector Castro Port of Entry .

1. Raul Hector Castro Port of Entry (a) Designation The United States Customs and Border Protection Port of Entry located at First Street and Pan American Avenue in Douglas, Arizona, shall be known and designated as the Raul Hector Castro Port of Entry . (b) References Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other record of the United States to the port of entry referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the Raul Hector Castro Port of Entry .

Passed the House of Representatives April 28, 2015. Karen L. Haas, Clerk.
I One Hundred Fourteenth Congress of the United States of America At the First Session Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday, the sixth day of January, two thousand and fifteen H. R. 1075 AN ACT To designate the United States Customs and Border Protection Port of Entry located at First Street and Pan American Avenue in Douglas, Arizona, as the Raul Hector Castro Port of Entry .

1. Raul Hector Castro Port of Entry (a) Designation The United States Customs and Border Protection Port of Entry located at First Street and Pan American Avenue in Douglas, Arizona, shall be known and designated as the Raul Hector Castro Port of Entry . (b) References Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other record of the United States to the port of entry referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the Raul Hector Castro Port of Entry .

Speaker of the House of Representatives. Vice President of the United States and President of the Senate.
I 114th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 1075 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES February 25, 2015 Mr. Grijalva (for himself, Ms. McSally , Mr. Gallego , Mrs. Kirkpatrick , Ms. Sinema , and Mr. Gosar ) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means A BILL To designate the United States Customs and Border Protection Port of Entry located at First Street and Pan American Avenue in Douglas, Arizona, as the Raul Hector Castro Port of Entry .

1. Raul Hector Castro Port of Entry (a) Designation The United States Customs and Border Protection Port of Entry located at First Street and Pan American Avenue in Douglas, Arizona, shall be known and designated as the Raul Hector Castro Port of Entry . (b) References Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other record of the United States to the port of entry referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the Raul Hector Castro Port of Entry .
IIB 114th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 1075 IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES April 29, 2015 Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works AN ACT To designate the United States Customs and Border Protection Port of Entry located at First Street and Pan American Avenue in Douglas, Arizona, as the Raul Hector Castro Port of Entry .

1. Raul Hector Castro Port of Entry (a) Designation The United States Customs and Border Protection Port of Entry located at First Street and Pan American Avenue in Douglas, Arizona, shall be known and designated as the Raul Hector Castro Port of Entry . (b) References Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other record of the United States to the port of entry referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the Raul Hector Castro Port of Entry .

Passed the House of Representatives April 28, 2015. Karen L. Haas, Clerk
I 114th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 1078 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES February 25, 2015 Mr. Lance (for himself, Ms. Eshoo , Mrs. Blackburn , Mrs. Mimi Walters of California , Ms. Matsui , Mr. Cárdenas , Mr. Sarbanes , Mr. Ted Lieu of California , Ms. Speier , and Mr. Gene Green of Texas ) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Budget A BILL To amend the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 to exempt from sequestration certain user fees of the Food and Drug Administration.

1. Short title This Act may be cited as the Food and Drug Administration Safety Over Sequestration Act of 2015 . 2. Exempting from sequestration certain user fees of Food and Drug Administration The Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 is amended— (1) in section 255(g)(1)(A) ( 2 U.S.C. 905(g)(1)(A) ), by inserting after Financial Agent Services the following new item: Food and Drug Administration, Salaries and Expenses, but only the portion of appropriations under such account corresponding to fees collected under sections 736, 738, 740, 741, 744B, and 744H of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (75–9911–0–1–554) ; and (2) in section 256(h) ( 2 U.S.C. 906(h) ), by adding at the end the following new paragraph: (5) This subsection shall not apply with respect to the portion of administrative expenses incurred by the Food and Drug Administration that are funded through fees collected under sections 736, 738, 740, 741, 744B, and 744H of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act. .
I 114th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 1080 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES February 25, 2015 Mr. Ben Ray Luján of New Mexico (for himself and Ms. Michelle Lujan Grisham of New Mexico ) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce A BILL To amend the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act in order to limit the penalties to a State that does not meet its maintenance of effort level of funding to a one-time penalty, and for other purposes.

1. Short title This Act may be cited as the IDEA MOE Adjustment Act . 2. IDEA penalty limitation (a) In general Section 611(d) of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act ( 20 U.S.C. 1411(d) ) is amended by adding at the end the following: (5) Special rule regarding penalties (A) Distribution of funds In any case where a State's allocation under this subsection is reduced pursuant to section 612(a)(18)(B), the Secretary shall distribute to all other States that were not subject to a reduction in allocation under such section, the amount by which any State's allocation under this subsection was reduced under such section, in accordance with subclauses (II) and (III) of paragraph (3)(A)(i) and without regard to paragraphs (A)(i)(I) and (B) of paragraph (3). (B) Use of funds by States Each State that receives additional funds under subparagraph (A) shall allocate such funds to local educational agencies in accordance with subsection (f). (C) No consideration for future years allocation In calculating the amounts for allocations under this subsection for fiscal year 2013 and all subsequent years, the Secretary, when determining the amount a State received under this subsection for a preceding fiscal year, shall not consider— (i) any amount by which a State's allocation for fiscal year 2012 or any subsequent year is reduced pursuant to section 612(a)(18); and (ii) any amount by which a State's allocation increased, pursuant to subparagraph (A), as a result of a State's reduction in allocation for fiscal year 2012 or any subsequent year. . (b) Application of Reduction Over Multi-Year Period Subparagraph (B) of section 612(a)(18) of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act ( 20 U.S.C. 1412(a)(18)(B) ) is amended to read as follows: (B) Reduction of funds for failure to maintain support In any case where a State fails to comply with the requirement of subparagraph (A) for a fiscal year, the State shall be subject to a reduction of the State's allocation of funds under section 611 by the amount by which the State fails to meet the requirement. The Secretary shall carry out such reduction, in accordance with section 611(d)(5), by— (i) reducing the State's allocation under section 611 for the following fiscal year by the entire amount of the reduction; or (ii) applying the reduction to the State's allocations under such section over a multi-year period of not more than 5 consecutive fiscal years, until the entire amount of the reduction has been applied. .
I 114th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 1084 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES February 25, 2015 Mr. O’Rourke (for himself, Mr. Lamborn , Mr. Grijalva , Mr. Yarmuth , Mr. Russell , Ms. Bordallo , and Mr. Cole ) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure A BILL To amend title 49, United States Code, to modify the criteria for selecting communities to participate in the Small Community Air Service Development Program, and for other purposes.

1. Short title This Act may be cited as the 21st Century SCASDP Act . 2. Small Community Air Service Development Program Section 41743(c)(1) of title 49, United States Code, is amended to read as follows: (1) Size On the date of the most recent notice of order soliciting community proposals issued by the Secretary under this section, the airport serving the community or consortium— (A) is not larger than a small hub airport, as determined using the Department of Transportation’s most recent published classification; and (B) (i) has insufficient air carrier service; or (ii) has unreasonably high air fares. .
I 114th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 1085 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES February 25, 2015 Mr. Pitts introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce A BILL To repeal the Prevention and Public Health Fund.

1. Repealing Prevention and Public Health Fund (a) In general Section 4002 of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act ( 42 U.S.C. 300u–11 ) is repealed. (b) Rescission of unobligated funds Of the funds made available by such section 4002, the unobligated balance is rescinded. (c) Notice of Rescission of Unobligated Funds Not later than 10 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Health and Human Services shall post on the public website of the Department of Health and Human Services a notice of— (1) the rescission, pursuant to subsection (b), of the unobligated balance of funds made available by such section 4002; and (2) the amount of such funds so rescinded.
I 114th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 1086 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES February 25, 2015 Mr. Rokita (for himself, Mr. Graves of Missouri , Mr. Pearce , Mr. Peterson , Mr. Lipinski , Mr. Flores , Mr. Hanna , and Mr. Pompeo ) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure A BILL To direct the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration to issue or revise regulations with respect to the medical certification of certain small aircraft pilots, and for other purposes.

1. Short title This Act may be cited as the General Aviation Pilot Protection Act of 2015 . 2. Medical certification of certain small aircraft pilots (a) In general Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration shall issue or revise medical certification regulations to ensure that an individual may operate as pilot in command of a covered aircraft without regard to any medical certification or proof of health requirement otherwise applicable under Federal law if— (1) the individual possesses a valid State driver's license and complies with any medical requirement associated with that license; (2) the individual is transporting not more than 5 passengers; (3) the individual is operating under visual flight rules or instrument flight rules; and (4) the relevant flight, including each portion thereof, is not carried out— (A) for compensation, including that no passenger or property on the flight is being carried for compensation; (B) at an altitude that is more than 14,000 feet above mean sea level; (C) outside the United States, unless authorized by the country in which the flight is conducted; or (D) at an indicated air speed exceeding 250 knots. (b) Covered aircraft defined In this section, the term covered aircraft means an aircraft that— (1) is not authorized under Federal law to carry more than 6 occupants; and (2) has a maximum certificated takeoff weight of not more than 6000 pounds. (c) Report required Not later than 5 years after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Administrator shall submit to Congress a report that describes the effect of the regulations issued or revised under subsection (a) and includes statistics with respect to changes in small aircraft activity and safety incidents. (d) Prohibition on enforcement actions On and after the date that is 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Administrator may not take an enforcement action for not holding a valid third-class medical certificate against a pilot of a covered aircraft for a flight if the pilot and the flight meet the applicable requirements under paragraphs (1) through (4) of subsection (a) unless the Administrator has published final regulations in the Federal Register under subsection (a).
I 114th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 1091 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES February 25, 2015 Ms. Wilson of Florida introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Agriculture A BILL To require the Secretary of Agriculture to use negotiated rulemaking to develop a rule about agriculture quarantine inspection, and for other purposes.

1. Short title This Act may be cited as the Fair and Transparent Stakeholder Involvement Fee Act . 2. Revised rulemaking authority with respect to agriculture quarantine inspection (a) Annul existing regulations The Secretary of Agriculture may not issue a final rule based on the proposed rule entitled User Fees for Agricultural Quarantine and Inspection Services (79 Fed. Reg. 22895; April 25, 2014) and if such final rule is issued before the date of the enactment of this Act, the final rule shall have no force or effect. (b) Restrictions on rulemaking authority The Secretary of Agriculture may not issue a final rule pursuant to section 2509(a) of the Food, Agriculture, Conservation, and Trade (FACT) Act of 1990 ( 21 U.S.C. 136a(a) ) except in compliance with the procedures described in subchapter III of chapter 5 of title 5, United States Code.
I 114th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 1092 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES AN ACT To designate the Federal building located at 2030 Southwest 145th Avenue in Miramar, Florida, as the Benjamin P. Grogan and Jerry L. Dove Federal Building .

1. Designation The Federal building located at 2030 Southwest 145th Avenue in Miramar, Florida, shall be known and designated as the Benjamin P. Grogan and Jerry L. Dove Federal Building . 2. References Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other record of the United States to the Federal building referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the Benjamin P. Grogan and Jerry L. Dove Federal Building .

Passed the House of Representatives March 24, 2015. Karen L. Haas, Clerk.
I One Hundred Fourteenth Congress of the United States of America At the First Session Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday, the sixth day of January, two thousand and fifteen H. R. 1092 AN ACT To designate the Federal building located at 2030 Southwest 145th Avenue in Miramar, Florida, as the Benjamin P. Grogan and Jerry L. Dove Federal Building .

1. Designation The Federal building located at 2030 Southwest 145th Avenue in Miramar, Florida, shall be known and designated as the Benjamin P. Grogan and Jerry L. Dove Federal Building . 2. References Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other record of the United States to the Federal building referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the Benjamin P. Grogan and Jerry L. Dove Federal Building .

Speaker of the House of Representatives. Vice President of the United States and President of the Senate.
I 114th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 1092 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES February 25, 2015 Ms. Wilson of Florida introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure A BILL To designate the Federal building located at 2030 Southwest 145th Avenue in Miramar, Florida, as the Benjamin P. Grogan and Jerry L. Dove Federal Bureau of Investigation Miami Field Office .

1. Designation The Federal building located at 2030 Southwest 145th Avenue in Miramar, Florida, shall be known and designated as the Benjamin P. Grogan and Jerry L. Dove Federal Bureau of Investigation Miami Field Office . 2. References Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other record of the United States to the Federal building referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the Benjamin P. Grogan and Jerry L. Dove Federal Bureau of Investigation Miami Field Office .
II 114th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 1092 IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES March 25, 2015 Received AN ACT To designate the Federal building located at 2030 Southwest 145th Avenue in Miramar, Florida, as the Benjamin P. Grogan and Jerry L. Dove Federal Building .

1. Designation The Federal building located at 2030 Southwest 145th Avenue in Miramar, Florida, shall be known and designated as the Benjamin P. Grogan and Jerry L. Dove Federal Building . 2. References Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other record of the United States to the Federal building referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the Benjamin P. Grogan and Jerry L. Dove Federal Building .

Passed the House of Representatives March 24, 2015. Karen L. Haas, Clerk
I 114th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 1094 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES February 26, 2015 Mr. Williams (for himself and Mr. Barton ) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services A BILL To authorize and request the President to award the Medal of Honor posthumously to Navy Seal Christopher Scott Kyle for acts of valor during Operation Iraqi Freedom.

1. Short title This Act may be cited as the Chris Kyle Medal of Honor Act . 2. Authorization for award of Medal of Honor to Navy Seal Christopher Scott Kyle for acts of valor during Operation Iraqi Freedom Notwithstanding the time limitations specified in sections 6248(a) and 6250 of title 10, United States Code, or any other time limitation with respect to the awarding of certain medals to persons who served in the Armed Forces, the President is authorized and requested to award the Medal of Honor posthumously under section 6241 of such title to Navy Seal Christopher Scott Kyle for acts of valor during Operation Iraqi Freedom.
I 114th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 1096 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES February 26, 2015 Mr. Byrne (for himself, Mr. Rogers of Alabama , Mrs. Roby , and Mr. Aderholt ) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs A BILL To amend the Veterans Access, Choice, and Accountability Act of 2014 to clarify the distance requirements regarding the eligibility of certain veterans to receive medical care and services from non-Department of Veterans Affairs facilities.

1. Short title This Act may be cited as the Real Choice for Veterans Act . 2. Clarification of distance requirement Section 101(b)(2)(B) of the Veterans Access, Choice, and Accountability Act of 2014 ( 38 U.S.C. 1701 note) is amended by striking medical facility and all that follows through the semicolon and inserting the following: closest medical facility of the Department, including a community-based outpatient clinic, that is able to provide to the veteran the care and services that the veteran seeks; .
I 114th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 1097 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES February 26, 2015 Mr. Lynch introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services A BILL To amend the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to prohibit trading on material inside information.

1. Short title This Act may be cited as the Ban Insider Trading Act of 2015 . 2. Prohibiting trading on material inside information (a) In general Section 10 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ( 15 U.S.C. 78j ) is amended by inserting after subsection (c) the following: (d) Trading on material inside information (1) In general To purchase or sell any security, or any securities-based swap agreement, based on information that the person knows or, considering factors including financial sophistication, net worth, knowledge of and experience in financial matters, position in a company, and amount of assets under management, should know is material information and inside information. (2) Rules of construction Nothing in this subsection may be construed— (A) to affect liability under subsection (b); or (B) to require for an action under paragraph (1) a personal benefit to any party. (3) Definitions In this subsection: (A) Inside information The term inside information means information that is— (i) nonpublic; and (ii) obtained— (I) illegally; (II) directly or indirectly from an issuer with an expectation of confidentiality or that such information will only be used for a legitimate business purposes; or (III) in violation of a fiduciary duty. (B) Material information The term material information means information that relates, directly or indirectly, to an issuer or a security, and that, if it were made public, would be likely to have a significant effect on the price of a security. . (b) Liability for disclosing material inside information Section 20(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ( 15 U.S.C. 78t(e) ) is amended— (1) by striking (e) and all that follows through For and inserting the following: (e) Prosecution of persons who aid and abet violations (1) In general For ; and (2) by adding at the end the following: (2) Prosecution of persons who facilitate violations of section 10(d) A person shall be deemed to have violated section 10(d) if the person intentionally discloses without a legitimate business purpose to another person information that the discloser knows or, considering factors including financial sophistication, net worth, knowledge of and experience in financial matters, position in a company, and amount of assets under management, should know is material information and inside information, as such terms are defined, respectively, in section 10(d)(3). . (c) Technical amendment Section 10 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ( 15 U.S.C. 78j ) is amended in the matter preceding subsection (a) by striking exchange— and inserting exchange: .
I 114th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 1102 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES February 26, 2015 Mr. Johnson of Georgia (for himself, Mr. Rangel , Ms. Norton , Mr. Ellison , Mr. Rush , Ms. Bass , Ms. Chu of California , Mr. Perlmutter , Mr. Thompson of Mississippi , Ms. Wilson of Florida , Ms. Lee , Mr. Clay , and Mr. Cleaver ) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary A BILL To amend title 18, United States Code, to provide a penalty for assault or homicide committed by certain State or local law enforcement officers, and for other purposes.

1. Short title This Act may be cited as the Police Accountability Act of 2015 . 2. Assault or homicide by certain State or local law enforcement officers (a) In general Chapter 1 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following: 28. Assault or homicide by certain State or local law enforcement officers (a) Offense Whoever, being a State or local law enforcement officer in a public agency which receives Federal funding under subpart 1 of part E of title I of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 ( 42 U.S.C. 3750 et seq. ) engages in any conduct in the line of duty that, were the conduct to occur in the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States, would constitute an offense under section 1111 or 1112 shall be punished as is provided for that offense under such section. (b) Definition In this section— (1) the term State or local law enforcement officer means an employee of a State or local government— (A) who has statutory authority to make arrests or apprehensions; (B) who is authorized by the agency of the employee to carry firearms; and (C) whose duties are primarily— (i) engagement in or supervision of the prevention, detection, investigation, or prosecution of, or the incarceration of any person for, any violation of law; or (ii) the protection of Federal, State, local, or foreign government officials against threats to personal safety; and (2) the term State or local government means the government— (A) of a State, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, or any other territory or possession of the United States; or (B) of a political subdivision of such a State, District, Commonwealth, territory or possession. . (b) Clerical amendment The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 1 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new item: 28. Assault or homicide by certain State or local law enforcement officers. .
IB 114th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 1104 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES AN ACT To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide a deduction from the gift tax for gifts made to certain exempt organizations.

1. Short title This Act may be cited as the Fair Treatment for All Gifts Act . 2. Deduction from gift tax for gifts made to certain exempt organizations (a) In general Section 2522(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking the period at the end of paragraph (4) and inserting a semicolon and by inserting after paragraph (4) the following new paragraph: (5) an organization described in paragraph (4), (5), or (6) of section 501(c) and exempt from tax under section 501(a). . (b) Effective date The amendments made by subsection (a) shall apply to gifts made after the date of the enactment of this Act. (c) No inference Nothing in the amendments made by subsection (a) shall be construed to create any inference with respect to whether any transfer of property (whether made before, on, or after the date of the enactment of this Act) to an organization described in paragraph (4), (5), or (6) of section 501(c) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is a transfer of property by gift for purposes of chapter 12 of such Code.

Passed the House of Representatives April 15, 2015. Karen L. Haas, Clerk.
I 114th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 1104 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES February 26, 2015 Mr. Roskam introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means A BILL To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide a deduction from the gift tax for gifts made to certain exempt organizations.

1. Short title This Act may be cited as the Fair Treatment for All Donations Act . 2. Deduction from gift tax for gifts made to certain exempt organizations (a) In general Section 2522(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking the period at the end of paragraph (4) and inserting a semi-colon and by inserting after paragraph (4) the following new paragraph: (5) an organization described in paragraph (4), (5), or (6) of section 501(c) and exempt from tax under section 501(a). . (b) Effective date The amendment made by subsection (a) shall apply to gifts made after the date of the enactment of this Act. (c) No inference Nothing in the amendment made by subsection (a) shall be construed to create any inference with respect to whether any transfer of property (whether made before, on, or after the date of the enactment of this Act) to an organization described in paragraph (4), (5), or (6) of section 501(c) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is a transfer of property by gift for purposes of chapter 12 of such Code.
IIB 114th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 1104 IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES April 16, 2015 Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance AN ACT To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide a deduction from the gift tax for gifts made to certain exempt organizations.

1. Short title This Act may be cited as the Fair Treatment for All Gifts Act . 2. Deduction from gift tax for gifts made to certain exempt organizations (a) In general Section 2522(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking the period at the end of paragraph (4) and inserting a semicolon and by inserting after paragraph (4) the following new paragraph: (5) an organization described in paragraph (4), (5), or (6) of section 501(c) and exempt from tax under section 501(a). . (b) Effective date The amendments made by subsection (a) shall apply to gifts made after the date of the enactment of this Act. (c) No inference Nothing in the amendments made by subsection (a) shall be construed to create any inference with respect to whether any transfer of property (whether made before, on, or after the date of the enactment of this Act) to an organization described in paragraph (4), (5), or (6) of section 501(c) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is a transfer of property by gift for purposes of chapter 12 of such Code.

Passed the House of Representatives April 15, 2015. Karen L. Haas, Clerk
IB Union Calendar No. 45 114th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 1104 [Report No. 114–64] IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES February 26, 2015 Mr. Roskam introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means April 13, 2015 Additional sponsors: Mr. Bishop of Michigan , Mr. Blum , Mr. Bost , Mr. Kelly of Pennsylvania , Mr. Grothman , and Mr. Reed April 13, 2015 Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printed Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert the part printed in italic For text of introduced bill, see copy of bill as introduced on February 26, 2015 A BILL To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide a deduction from the gift tax for gifts made to certain exempt organizations.

1. Short title This Act may be cited as the Fair Treatment for All Gifts Act . 2. Deduction from gift tax for gifts made to certain exempt organizations (a) In general Section 2522(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking the period at the end of paragraph (4) and inserting a semicolon and by inserting after paragraph (4) the following new paragraph: (5) an organization described in paragraph (4), (5), or (6) of section 501(c) and exempt from tax under section 501(a). . (b) Effective date The amendments made by subsection (a) shall apply to gifts made after the date of the enactment of this Act. (c) No inference Nothing in the amendments made by subsection (a) shall be construed to create any inference with respect to whether any transfer of property (whether made before, on, or after the date of the enactment of this Act) to an organization described in paragraph (4), (5), or (6) of section 501(c) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is a transfer of property by gift for purposes of chapter 12 of such Code.

April 13, 2015 Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printed
I 114th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 1106 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES February 26, 2015 Mrs. Blackburn (for herself, Mr. Pompeo , Mr. Pittenger , Mr. Meadows , Mrs. Ellmers of North Carolina , and Mr. Rouzer ) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce A BILL To amend section 706 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 to provide that such section does not authorize the Federal Communications Commission to preempt the laws of certain States relating to the regulation of municipal broadband, and for other purposes.

1. Short title This Act may be cited as the States’ Rights Municipal Broadband Act of 2015 . 2. Sense of Congress It is the sense of Congress that the Federal Communications Commission does not have the authority under section 706 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 ( 47 U.S.C. 1302 ) to prevent any State from implementing any law of such State with respect to the provision of broadband Internet access service (as defined in section 8.11 of title 47, Code of Federal Regulations) by such State or a municipality or other political subdivision of such State. 3. Preservation of State municipal broadband laws Section 706 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 ( 47 U.S.C. 1302 ) is amended— (1) by redesignating subsection (d) as subsection (e); and (2) by inserting after subsection (c) the following: (d) Preservation of State municipal broadband laws Nothing in this section shall be construed as authorizing the Commission to prevent the State of Alabama, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Florida, Louisiana, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, Nevada, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, Washington, or Wisconsin, or any other State, from implementing any law of such State with respect to the provision of broadband Internet access service (as defined in section 8.11 of title 47, Code of Federal Regulations) by such State or a municipality or other political subdivision of such State. .
I 114th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 1108 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES February 26, 2015 Ms. Titus introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means A BILL To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exempt sports betting from the tax on authorized wagers.

1. Short title This Act may be cited as the Sports Bets Collection Tax Correction Act . 2. Sports betting exempt from the excise tax on authorized wagers (a) In general Section 4402 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking or at the end of paragraph (2), by striking the period at the end of paragraph (3) and inserting , or , and by adding at the end the following new paragraph: (4) Sports betting authorized under State law On any wager which is authorized under the law of the State in which accepted and which is placed with respect to any sporting event. . (b) Effective date The amendments made by this section shall apply to wagers placed after the date of the enactment of this Act.
I 114th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 1109 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES February 26, 2015 Mrs. Mimi Walters of California introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means A BILL To amend title II of the Social Security Act to increase the maximum amount of the lump-sum death benefit.

1. Short title This Act may be cited as the Social Security Lump-Sum Death Benefit Improvement and Modernization Act of 2015 . 2. Increase in maximum amount of lump-sum death payments (a) In general Section 202(i) of the Social Security Act ( 42 U.S.C. 402(i) ) is amended by striking $255 and inserting $1,000 . (b) Effective date The amendment made by this section shall apply with respect to deaths that occur after the date of the enactment of this Act.
I 114th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 1110 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES February 26, 2015 Ms. Wasserman Schultz (for herself and Mr. Smith of Texas ) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary A BILL To provide effective criminal prosecutions for certain identity thefts, and for other purposes.

1. Short title This Act may be cited as the Stopping Tax Offenders and Prosecuting Identity Theft Act of 2015 or the STOP Identity Theft Act of 2015 . 2. Use of Department of Justice resources with regard to tax return identity theft (a) In general The Attorney General should make use of all existing resources of the Department of Justice, including any appropriate task forces, to bring more perpetrators of tax return identity theft to justice. (b) Considerations To be taken into account In carrying out this section, the Attorney General should take into account the following: (1) The need to concentrate efforts in those areas of the country where the crime is most frequently reported. (2) The need to coordinate with State and local authorities for the most efficient use of their laws and resources to prosecute and prevent the crime. (3) The need to protect vulnerable groups, such as veterans, seniors, and minors (especially foster children) from becoming victims or otherwise used in the offense. 3. Victims of identity theft may include organizations Chapter 47 of title 18, United States Code, is amended— (1) in section 1028— (A) in subsection (a)(7), by inserting (including an organization) after another person ; and (B) in subsection (d)(7), in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), by inserting or other person after specific individual ; and (2) in section 1028A(a)(1), by inserting (including an organization) after another person . 4. Identity theft for purposes of tax fraud Section 1028(b)(3) of title 18, United States Code, is amended— (1) in subparagraph (B), by striking or at the end; (2) in subparagraph (C), by inserting or after the semicolon; and (3) by adding at the end the following: (D) during and in relation to a felony under section 7206 or 7207 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986; . 5. Reporting requirement Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Attorney General shall submit to the Committees on the Judiciary of the House of Representatives and the Senate a report that contains the following information: (1) Information readily available to the Department of Justice about trends in the incidence of tax return identity theft. (2) Recommendations on additional statutory tools that would aid in the effective prosecution of tax return identity theft. (3) The status on implementing the recommendations of the Department’s March 2010 Audit Report 10–21 entitled The Department of Justice’s Efforts to Combat Identity Theft .
I 114th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 1114 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES February 26, 2015 Mr. Abraham introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means , and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary , for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned A BILL To modify the definition of antique firearm .

1. Amendment to title 18, United States Code Section 921(a)(16)(A) of title 18, United States Code, is amended by striking 1898 and inserting the calendar year that is 100 years before the calendar year in which the determination as to whether the firearm meets the requirement of this subparagraph is being made . 2. Amendment to Internal Revenue Code of 1986 Subsection (g) of section 5845 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended— (1) by striking 1898 the first place it appears and inserting the calendar year that is 100 years before the calendar year in which the determination as to whether the firearm meets the requirement of this subsection is being made , (2) by striking the year 1898 and inserting the calendar year that is 100 years before the calendar year in which such determination is being made , and (3) by striking 1898, and inserting the calendar year that is 100 years before the calendar year in which such determination is being made, .
I 114th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 1115 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES February 26, 2015 Mrs. Beatty (for herself and Mr. Poe of Texas ) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary , and in addition to the Committee on Education and the Workforce , for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned A BILL To improve the response to missing children and victims of child sex trafficking.

1. Short title This Act may be cited as the Bringing Missing Children Home Act of 2015 . 2. Response to missing children and victims of child sex trafficking (a) Missing Children's Assistance Act Section 404(b)(1)(P)(iii) of the Missing Children's Assistance Act ( 42 U.S.C. 5773(b)(1)(P)(iii) ) is amended by striking child prostitution and inserting child sex trafficking . (b) Crime Control Act of 1990 Section 3702 of the Crime Control Act of 1990 ( 42 U.S.C. 5780 ) is amended— (1) in paragraph (2), by striking and at the end; (2) in paragraph (3)— (A) by redesignating subparagraphs (B) and (C) as subparagraphs (C) and (D), respectively; and (B) by inserting after subparagraph (A) the following: (B) a recent photograph of the child, if available; ; and (3) in paragraph (4)— (A) in subparagraph (A), by striking 60 days and inserting 30 days ; (B) in subparagraph (B), by striking and at the end; (C) in subparagraph (C)— (i) by inserting State and local child welfare systems and before the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children ; and (ii) by striking the period at the end and inserting ; and ; and (D) by adding at the end the following: (D) grant permission to the National Crime Information Center Terminal Contractor for the State to update the missing person record in the National Crime Information Center computer networks with additional information learned during the investigation relating to the missing person. .
I 114th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 1127 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES February 26, 2015 Mrs. Kirkpatrick introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs A BILL To amend title 38, United States Code, to authorize the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to make certain grants to assist nursing homes for veterans located on tribal lands.

1. Grants for State homes located on tribal lands (a) State home defined Section 101(19) of title 38, United States Code, is amended by inserting or federally recognized Indian tribe after (other than a possession) . (b) Payments to State homes Section 1741 of title 38, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection: (g) In this subchapter, the term State means each of the several States and each federally recognized Indian tribe. . (c) State home construction (1) In general Section 8131(2) of title 38, United States Code, is amended by inserting includes each federally recognized Indian tribe but before does not . (2) Conforming amendment Section 8132 of such title is amended by striking several .
I 114th CONGRESS 2d Session H. R. 1132 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES AN ACT To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 1048 West Robinhood Drive in Stockton, California, as the W. Ronald Coale Memorial Post Office Building .

1. W. Ronald Coale Memorial Post Office Building (a) Designation The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 1048 West Robinhood Drive in Stockton, California, shall be known and designated as the W. Ronald Coale Memorial Post Office Building . (b) References Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the W. Ronald Coale Memorial Post Office Building .

Passed the House of Representatives March 1, 2016. Karen L. Haas, Clerk.
I One Hundred Fourteenth Congress of the United States of America At the Second Session Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday, the fourth day of January, two thousand and sixteen H. R. 1132 AN ACT To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 1048 West Robinhood Drive in Stockton, California, as the W. Ronald Coale Memorial Post Office Building .

1. W. Ronald Coale Memorial Post Office Building (a) Designation The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 1048 West Robinhood Drive in Stockton, California, shall be known and designated as the W. Ronald Coale Memorial Post Office Building . (b) References Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the W. Ronald Coale Memorial Post Office Building .

Speaker of the House of Representatives. Vice President of the United States and President of the Senate.
I 114th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 1132 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES February 26, 2015 Mr. McNerney (for himself, Mr. Rohrabacher , Mr. Vargas , Mrs. Napolitano , Mr. Schiff , Mr. Takano , Mr. Peters , Mr. Farr , Mr. Cárdenas , and Mr. Lowenthal ) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform A BILL To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 1048 West Robinhood Drive in Stockton, California, as the W. Ronald Coale Memorial Post Office Building .

1. W. Ronald Coale Memorial Post Office Building (a) Designation The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 1048 West Robinhood Drive in Stockton, California, shall be known and designated as the W. Ronald Coale Memorial Post Office Building . (b) References Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the W. Ronald Coale Memorial Post Office Building .
IIB 114th CONGRESS 2d Session H. R. 1132 IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES March 2, 2016 Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs AN ACT To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 1048 West Robinhood Drive in Stockton, California, as the W. Ronald Coale Memorial Post Office Building .

1. W. Ronald Coale Memorial Post Office Building (a) Designation The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 1048 West Robinhood Drive in Stockton, California, shall be known and designated as the W. Ronald Coale Memorial Post Office Building . (b) References Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the W. Ronald Coale Memorial Post Office Building .

Passed the House of Representatives March 1, 2016. Karen L. Haas, Clerk