hyperdemocracy/usc-textversion huggingface dataset:
I 114th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 2091 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES AN ACT To amend the Fair Credit Reporting Act to clarify the ability to request consumer reports in certain cases to establish and enforce child support payments and awards.

1. Short title This Act may be cited as the Child Support Assistance Act of 2015 . 2. Requests for consumer reports by State or local child support enforcement agencies Paragraph (4) of section 604(a) of the Fair Credit Reporting Act ( 15 U.S.C. 1681b(a)(4) ) is amended— (1) in subparagraph (A), by striking or determining the appropriate level of such payments and inserting , determining the appropriate level of such payments, or enforcing a child support order, award, agreement, or judgment ; (2) in subparagraph (B)— (A) by striking paternity and inserting parentage ; and (B) by adding and at the end; (3) by striking subparagraph (C); and (4) by redesignating subparagraph (D) as subparagraph (C).

Passed the House of Representatives October 6, 2015. Karen L. Haas, Clerk.
I 114th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 2091 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES April 29, 2015 Mr. Poliquin (for himself, Mr. Ellison , Mr. David Scott of Georgia , Mr. Duffy , Mr. Murphy of Florida , and Mrs. Wagner ) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services A BILL To amend the Fair Credit Reporting Act to clarify the ability to request consumer reports in certain cases to establish and enforce child support payments and awards.

1. Short title This Act may be cited as the Child Support Assistance Act of 2015 . 2. Requests for consumer reports by State or local child support enforcement agencies Paragraph (4) of section 604(a) of the Fair Credit Reporting Act ( 15 U.S.C. 1681b(a)(4) ) is amended— (1) in subparagraph (A), by striking or determining the appropriate level of such payments and inserting , determining the appropriate level of such payments, or enforcing a child support order, award, agreement, or judgment ; (2) in subparagraph (B)— (A) by striking paternity and inserting parentage ; and (B) by adding and at the end; (3) by striking subparagraph (C); and (4) by redesignating subparagraph (D) as subparagraph (C).
IIB 114th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 2091 IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES October 7, 2015 Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs AN ACT To amend the Fair Credit Reporting Act to clarify the ability to request consumer reports in certain cases to establish and enforce child support payments and awards.

1. Short title This Act may be cited as the Child Support Assistance Act of 2015 . 2. Requests for consumer reports by State or local child support enforcement agencies Paragraph (4) of section 604(a) of the Fair Credit Reporting Act ( 15 U.S.C. 1681b(a)(4) ) is amended— (1) in subparagraph (A), by striking or determining the appropriate level of such payments and inserting , determining the appropriate level of such payments, or enforcing a child support order, award, agreement, or judgment ; (2) in subparagraph (B)— (A) by striking paternity and inserting parentage ; and (B) by adding and at the end; (3) by striking subparagraph (C); and (4) by redesignating subparagraph (D) as subparagraph (C).

Passed the House of Representatives October 6, 2015. Karen L. Haas, Clerk
IB Union Calendar No. 214 114th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 2091 [Report No. 114–282] IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES April 29, 2015 Mr. Poliquin (for himself, Mr. Ellison , Mr. David Scott of Georgia , Mr. Duffy , Mr. Murphy of Florida , and Mrs. Wagner ) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services October 6, 2015 Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union and ordered to be printed A BILL To amend the Fair Credit Reporting Act to clarify the ability to request consumer reports in certain cases to establish and enforce child support payments and awards.

1. Short title This Act may be cited as the Child Support Assistance Act of 2015 . 2. Requests for consumer reports by State or local child support enforcement agencies Paragraph (4) of section 604(a) of the Fair Credit Reporting Act ( 15 U.S.C. 1681b(a)(4) ) is amended— (1) in subparagraph (A), by striking or determining the appropriate level of such payments and inserting , determining the appropriate level of such payments, or enforcing a child support order, award, agreement, or judgment ; (2) in subparagraph (B)— (A) by striking paternity and inserting parentage ; and (B) by adding and at the end; (3) by striking subparagraph (C); and (4) by redesignating subparagraph (D) as subparagraph (C).

October 6, 2015 Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union and ordered to be printed
I 114th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 2094 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES April 29, 2015 Mr. Westmoreland introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services , and in addition to the Committees on Agriculture , the Judiciary , and Ways and Means , for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned A BILL To repeal titles I and II of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act.

1. Repeal Titles I and II of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act ( 12 U.S.C. 5301 et seq. ) are hereby repealed, and the provisions of law amended or repealed by such titles are restored or revived as if such titles had not been enacted.
I 114th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 2098 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES April 29, 2015 Mr. Crawford (for himself, Mr. Womack , Mr. Westerman , and Mr. Hill ) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources A BILL To amend the Endangered Species Act of 1973 to require the Secretary of the Interior to publish and make available for public comment a draft economic analysis at the time a proposed rule to designate critical habitat is published.

1. Short title This Act may be cited as the Common Sense in Species Protection Act of 2015 . 2. Draft economic analysis for critical habitat designation (a) In general Section 4(b)(2) of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 ( 16 U.S.C. 1533(b)(2) ) is amended— (1) in the first sentence, by striking (2) The Secretary shall and inserting the following: (2) Critical habitat designation (A) In general The Secretary shall ; (2) in the second sentence, by striking The Secretary may and inserting the following: (B) Exclusions The Secretary shall ; and (3) by adding at the end the following: (C) Draft economic analysis (i) Requirement At the time a proposed rule to designate critical habitat is published, the Secretary shall publish and make available for public comment a draft analysis that— (I) examines the incremental and cumulative economic effects of all actions to protect the species and its habitat (including the effects of the proposed designation) upon each State and locality that is the subject of, or affected by, the proposed designation; (II) includes consideration of public and private economic effects on— (aa) possible uses of land and property values; (bb) the provision of water, power, or other public services; (cc) employment; and (dd) revenues available for State and local governments, including a political subdivision of a State that directly or indirectly provides public services, school districts, and any other instrumentality of a State; (III) complies with the guidelines issued pursuant to section 515 of the Treasury and General Government Appropriations Act of 2001 (114 Stat. 2763A–153); and (IV) assesses such effects on a quantitative and qualitative basis. (ii) Determination factors not affected Nothing in clause (i) shall be construed as adding to, subtracting from, or otherwise modifying the factors set forth in subsection (a)(1) or the bases set forth in paragraph (1) of this subsection . (b) Application (1) In general The amendments made by subsection (a) shall apply with respect to any designation of critical habitat under such Act on or after August 28, 2013. (2) Report Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary (as that term is defined in such Act) shall submit a report to the Congress describing the effect of paragraph (1).
I 114th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 2099 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES April 29, 2015 Mr. Carney introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services A BILL To amend the Consumer Financial Protection Act of 2010 to require the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection to develop a model form for a disclosure notice that shall be used by depository institutions and credit unions, and for other purposes.

1. Findings Congress finds that: (1) Depository institutions and credit unions have an obligation to provide consumers with policy and fee information in a concise and easy to understand format. (2) Because the length of disclosure forms ranges from 21 to 153 pages for depository institutions and 9 to 53 pages for credit unions, consumers have a difficult time understanding how much they are paying for their checking accounts and other financial products. Consumers should be able to compare account terms and conditions among depository institutions and credit unions. (3) A simplified, standardized disclosure form would reduce consumer confusion and make it easier for institutions to compete on price and quality of financial products. 2. Model disclosures for depository institutions and credit unions Section 1032 of the Consumer Financial Protection Act of 2010 ( 12 U.S.C. 5532 ) is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection: (g) Model disclosures for depository institutions and credit unions (1) In general The Bureau, by rule, shall develop a model form for a disclosure notice that shall be used by depository institutions and credit unions for provision of disclosures to be given to a consumer before that consumer opens a checking account. (2) Stakeholder input Prior to issuing a rule pursuant to paragraph (1), the Bureau shall solicit input from representatives of depository institutions and credit unions, non-profit consumer protection entities, and organizations that represent the interests of depository institutions and credit unions. (3) Requirements A model form developed pursuant to paragraph (1) shall— (A) comply with the format requirements of subsection (b)(2); (B) when practicable, be made available on the website of the depository institution or credit union; and (C) include disclosures relating to— (i) opening a checking account and use of such account; (ii) consequences of overdraft on such account, including any fees related to overdraft; (iii) processing policies of the depository institution or credit union; and (iv) procedures for resolving a dispute between the consumer and the depository institution or credit union. (4) Exemption for certain banks Any depository institution or credit union with total assets of less than $2,000,000,000 shall be exempt from the requirements of this subsection. .
I 114th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 2107 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES April 29, 2015 Mr. Guthrie (for himself and Mr. Schrader ) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce A BILL To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to clarify the treatment of certain Medicaid enrollment brokers.

1. Treatment of certain Medicaid brokers Section 1903(b)(4) of the Social Security Act ( 42 U.S.C. 1396b(b)(4) ) is amended— (1) in the matter before subparagraph (A), by inserting after respect to the broker the following: (or, in the case of subparagraph (A) or subparagraph (B)(i), if the Secretary finds that the broker has established and maintains policies and procedures to ensure the independence of its enrollment activities from the interests of any managed care entity or provider) ; and (2) in subparagraph (B)— (A) by inserting (i) after either ; and (B) by inserting (ii) after health care provider or .
I 114th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 2109 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES April 29, 2015 Mr. Huizenga of Michigan (for himself, Mrs. Lummis , Mr. Neugebauer , Mr. Collins of Georgia , and Mr. Hardy ) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources , and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary , for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned A BILL To amend the Endangered Species Act of 1973 to conform citizen suits under that Act with other existing law, and for other purposes.

1. Short title This Act may be cited as the Endangered Species Litigation Reasonableness Act . 2. Award of litigation costs to prevailing parties in accordance with existing law Section 11(g)(4) of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 ( 16 U.S.C. 1540(g)(4) ) is amended by striking to any and all that follows through the end of the sentence and inserting to any prevailing party in accordance with section 2412 of title 28, United States Code. .
I 114th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 2112 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES April 29, 2015 Mr. Lance introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform A BILL To direct the United States Postal Service to designate a single, unique ZIP Code for North Plainfield, New Jersey.

1. Single, unique ZIP Code for North Plainfield, New Jersey Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this section, the United States Postal Service shall designate a single, unique ZIP Code applicable to the area encompassing only North Plainfield, New Jersey.
I 114th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 2117 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES April 29, 2015 Ms. Plaskett introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means A BILL To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the limitation on the amount of distilled spirits taxes covered over to the Virgin Islands and Puerto Rico.

1. Repeal of limitation on cover over of distilled spirits taxes to Virgin Islands and Puerto Rico (a) In general Section 7652 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking subsection (f) and by redesignating subsections (g) and (h) as subsections (f) and (g), respectively. (b) Effective date The amendments made by this section shall apply to distilled spirits brought into the United States after December 31, 2015.
I 114th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 2118 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES April 29, 2015 Ms. Plaskett introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means A BILL To amend the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States to extend to 2027 the production certificate program that allows refunds of duties on certain articles produced in United States insular possessions.

1. Extension of production certificate program for certain products of United States insular possessions Additional U.S. Note 5(h)(i) to chapter 91 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by striking 2015 and inserting 2027 .
I 114th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 2119 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES April 29, 2015 Mr. Shimkus introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce A BILL To amend title XI of the Social Security Act to require that State applications for State plan waivers under the Medicaid program be approved only if such applications are budget neutral, and for other purposes.

1. Budget neutrality required for State plan waivers under Medicaid (a) In general Section 1115(d) of the Social Security Act ( 42 U.S.C. 1315(d) ) is amended— (1) by redesignating paragraph (3) as paragraph (4); and (2) by inserting after paragraph (2) the following new paragraph: (3) (A) Beginning with fiscal year 2016, the Secretary shall require, as a condition on the approval of a demonstration project in a State under this section, that the project be budget neutral, as determined by the Secretary in accordance with subparagraph (B) and subject to subparagraph (C). (B) A determination by the Secretary under this paragraph on whether a demonstration project is budget neutral shall be based on— (i) the historical Federal and State expenditures made under the State plan under title XIX, including any adjustments to such expenditures (other than adjustments to account for improper or otherwise unallowable payments) supported by data or other documentation; (ii) the State’s historical spending growth rates and population growth rates, including any adjustments supported by data or documentation; and (iii) any other criteria determined appropriate by the Secretary. (C) The Secretary may not determine that a demonstration project is budget neutral under this paragraph unless the Chief Actuary of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services certifies to the Secretary that the project is budget neutral. (D) For purposes of this paragraph, the term budget neutral means, with respect to a demonstration project, that the Federal expenditures under the project in the State do not exceed the Federal expenditures that would otherwise have been made if the State had in effect a plan approved under title XIX. ; and (3) in paragraph (4) (as redesignated by paragraph (1))— (A) by striking Congress concerning actions and inserting Congress on, and make available to the public information on, any actions ; and (B) by inserting , including any data or other information relating to determinations of the Secretary under paragraph (3) that such demonstration projects are budget neutral before the period at the end. (b) Regulations Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Health and Human Services shall issue regulations to carry out the amendments made by subsection (a), including regulations specifying the criteria to be used in making determinations under paragraph (3) of section 1115(d) of the Social Security Act ( 42 U.S.C. 1315(d) ), as inserted by subsection (a).
I 114th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 2120 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES April 29, 2015 Mr. Smith of New Jersey introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary A BILL To encourage States to expand the protections offered to victims of sex offenses who are not in a familiar or dating relationship with the perpetrators of such offenses.

1. Short title This Act may be cited as Nicole’s Law of 2015 . 2. Protection for victims of sex offenses (a) In General For each fiscal year beginning after the expiration of the period specified in subsection (b)(1) in which a State receives funds under the subpart referred to in subsection (b)(2) , the State shall have in effect throughout the State laws and policies that ensure that, with respect to criminal cases involving sex offenses (as defined by the State), protections similar to those offered to victims of domestic violence are extended to victims of sex offenses who are not in a familiar or dating relationship with the perpetrators of such offenses. To demonstrate compliance with the preceding sentence, a State shall have in effect laws and policies that— (1) expressly authorize judges and courts to issue, as a condition of bail, protection orders that prohibit a defendant charged with a sex offense from having any contact with the victim or with the victim’s friends, co-workers, or relatives; (2) permit judges and courts, after finding a defendant guilty of a sex offense, to order a continuation of a protection order described in paragraph (1) , or to otherwise restrict a defendant’s contact with the victim, as a condition of bail, parole, probation, or other supervised release; and (3) provide judges and courts with the authority to grant or extend a protection order until further order of a judge or court, as an alternative to issuing protection orders that expire on a specific date or upon termination of a sentence or period of supervised release. (b) Compliance and ineligibility (1) Compliance date Each State shall have not more than one year from the date of enactment of this Act in which to fully implement this section, except that the Attorney General may grant an additional one year to a State that is making good faith efforts to implement this section. (2) Ineligibility for funds For any fiscal year after the expiration of the period specified in paragraph (1) , a State that fails to fully implement this section, as determined by the Attorney General, shall not receive 10 percent of the funds that would otherwise be allocated for that fiscal year to the State under subpart 1 of part E of title I of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 ( 42 U.S.C. 3750 et seq. ). (c) Reallocation Amounts not allocated under the subpart referred to in subsection (b)(2) to a State for failure to fully implement this section shall be reallocated under that subpart to States that have not failed to fully implement this section. (d) Definition of State In this section, The term State includes each of the several States, the District of Columbia, and any commonwealth, territory, or possession of the United States.
I 114th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 2121 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES April 29, 2015 Mr. Stivers (for himself, Ms. Sewell of Alabama , Mr. Westmoreland , Mrs. Beatty , Mr. Messer , and Ms. Sinema ) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services A BILL To amend the S.A.F.E. Mortgage Licensing Act of 2008 to provide a temporary license for loan originators transitioning between employers, and for other purposes.

1. Short title This Act may be cited as the SAFE Transitional Licensing Act of 2015 . 2. Loan originator employment transitions Section 1504 of the S.A.F.E. Mortgage Licensing Act of 2008 ( 12 U.S.C. 5103 ) is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection: (c) Employment transition (1) Temporary license for persons moving from a financial institution to a non-bank originator A registered loan originator shall be deemed to be a State-licensed loan originator for the 120-day period beginning on the date that a State-licensed mortgage lender, mortgage banker, or mortgage servicer, that is not a depository institution, registers with the Nationwide Mortgage Licensing System and Registry that such registered loan originator is employed by such State-licensed mortgage lender, mortgage banker, or mortgage servicer. (2) Temporary license for persons moving interstate A registered loan originator or State-licensed loan originator in one State shall be deemed to be a State-licensed loan originator in another State for the 120-day period beginning on the date that a State-licensed mortgage lender, mortgage banker, or mortgage servicer in such other State registers with the Nationwide Mortgage Licensing System and Registry that such person is employed by such State-licensed mortgage lender, mortgage banker, or mortgage servicer. (3) Federal and State recognition Registration pursuant to paragraph (1) or (2) shall fulfill any licensing and registration requirement for a loan originator pursuant to this section and any State law or regulation. (4) Applicability Any person registering a registered loan originator with the Nationwide Mortgage Licensing System and Registry under this subsection shall be subject to this Act and to applicable State law to the same extent as if such registered loan originator was licensed and registered as a State-licensed loan originator under subsection (a). .
V 114th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 2122 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES April 29, 2015 Mr. Gene Green of Texas introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary A BILL For the relief of Enrique Soriano and Areli Soriano.

1. Permanent resident status for Enrique Soriano and Areli Soriano (a) In general Notwithstanding subsections (a) and (b) of section 201 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, Enrique Soriano and Areli Soriano shall each be eligible for issuance of an immigrant visa or for adjustment of status to that of an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence upon filing an application for issuance of an immigrant visa under section 204 of such Act or for adjustment of status to lawful permanent resident. (b) Adjustment of status If Enrique Soriano or Areli Soriano enters the United States before the filing deadline specified in subsection (c), he or she shall be considered to have entered and remained lawfully and shall, if otherwise eligible, be eligible for adjustment of status under section 245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act as of the date of the enactment of this Act. (c) Deadline for application and payment of fees Subsections (a) and (b) shall apply only if the application for issuance of an immigrant visa or the application for adjustment of status is filed with appropriate fees within 2 years after the date of the enactment of this Act. (d) Reduction of immigrant visa number Upon the granting of an immigrant visa or permanent residence to Enrique Soriano and Areli Soriano, the Secretary of State shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by 2, during the current or next following fiscal year, the total number of immigrant visas that are made available to natives of the country of the aliens’ birth under section 203(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act or, if applicable, the total number of immigrant visas that are made available to natives of the country of the aliens’ birth under section 202(e) of such Act. (e) Denial of preferential immigration treatment for certain relatives The natural parents, brothers, and sisters of Enrique Soriano and Areli Soriano shall not, by virtue of such relationship, be accorded any right, privilege, or status under the Immigration and Nationality Act.
I 114th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 2123 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES April 30, 2015 Mr. Murphy of Pennsylvania (for himself, Mr. Lipinski , Mr. Jones , Mrs. Ellmers of North Carolina , Mr. Bucshon , Mr. Renacci , Mr. Tonko , Mr. Kelly of Pennsylvania , Mr. Bilirakis , Mr. Crawford , Mr. Dold , Mr. Tom Price of Georgia , and Ms. Gabbard ) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs A BILL To direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to furnish non-formulary drugs and medicines to veterans diagnosed with mental health disorders, and for other purposes.

1. Short title (a) Short title This Act may be cited as the Enhancing Veterans’ Access to Treatment Act of 2015 . 2. Department of Veterans Affairs furnishing of non-formulary drugs and medicines to veterans with mental health disorders (a) Availability of non-Formulary drugs and medicines Notwithstanding any other provision of law, in the case of a veteran who is enrolled in the patient enrollment system under section 1705 of title 38, United States Code, who a duly licensed physician, including a Department of Defense physician, has determined is taking or has taken during the 90-day period preceding the date of such determination, a prescribed drug or medicine that has been effective in treating a mental health disorder with which the veteran has been diagnosed, the Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall take such steps as may be necessary to furnish such drug or medicine to such veteran if the prescription is ordered by a duly licensed physician, regardless of whether such drug or medicine is available under the formulary in use by the Department of Veterans Affairs. (b) VA capacity To dispense certain non-Formulary drugs and medicines The Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall revise the prescription medication formulary of the Department of Veterans Affairs to ensure that all medications within the classes of antipsychotics and antidepressants that are prescribed by Department of Defense physicians, including such medications prescribed for the treatment of post-traumatic stress disorder, traumatic brain injury, schizophrenia, depression, and bipolar disorder, are available at all Department of Veterans Affairs pharmacies.
I 114th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 2125 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES April 30, 2015 Mr. Yarmuth (for himself, Mr. Pallone , Ms. Eshoo , Ms. Pelosi , Mr. Butterfield , Ms. Clarke of New York , Mr. Cohen , Mr. Deutch , Mr. Michael F. Doyle of Pennsylvania , Mr. Loebsack , Mr. Ben Ray Luján of New Mexico , Ms. Matsui , Mr. McGovern , Mr. McNerney , Mr. Sarbanes , Mr. Welch , and Ms. Edwards ) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce A BILL To direct the Federal Communications Commission to revise its sponsorship identification rules so as to require the disclosure of the names of significant donors to persons paying for or furnishing broadcast matter or origination cablecasting matter that is political matter or matter involving the discussion of a controversial issue of public importance.

1. Short title This Act may be cited as the Keeping Our Campaigns Honest Act of 2015 . 2. Revision to sponsorship identification rules Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Federal Communications Commission shall revise its sponsorship identification rules (sections 73.1212 and 76.1615 of title 47, Code of Federal Regulations) so as to provide that, in the case of broadcast matter or origination cablecasting matter that is political matter or matter involving the discussion of a controversial issue of public importance, the announcement required by such sections shall include the names of significant donors to the person the identity of which is required to be disclosed in such announcement.
I 114th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 2126 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES April 30, 2015 Mr. Poe of Texas (for himself, Mr. Farenthold , Mr. Rogers of Alabama , Mr. Brooks of Alabama , Mr. Griffith , Mr. Tom Price of Georgia , and Mr. Roe of Tennessee ) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce , and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means , for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned A BILL To prohibit the Secretary of Health and Human Services from replacing ICD–9 with ICD–10 in implementing the HIPAA code set standards.

1. Short title This Act may be cited as the Cutting Costly Codes Act of 2015 . 2. Prohibiting replacement of ICD–9 with ICD–10 in implementing HIPAA code set standards (a) In general The Secretary of Health and Human Services may not implement, administer, or enforce the regulations issued on January 16, 2009 (74 Fed. Reg. 3328), the regulation issued on September 5, 2012 (77 Fed. Reg. 54664), or any similar regulation, insofar as any such regulation provides for the replacement of ICD–9 with ICD–10 as a standard for code sets under section 1173(c) of the Social Security Act ( 42 U.S.C. 1320d–2(c) ) and section 162.1002 of title 45, Code of Federal Regulations. (b) GAO report on ICD–9 replacement (1) Study The Comptroller General of the United States, in consultation with stakeholders in the medical community, shall conduct a study to identify steps that can be taken to mitigate the disruption on health care providers resulting from a replacement of ICD–9 as such a standard. (2) Report Not later than 6 months after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General shall submit to each House of Congress a report on such study. Such report shall include such recommendations respecting such replacement and such legislative and administrative steps as may be appropriate to mitigate the disruption resulting from such replacement as the Comptroller General determines appropriate.
I 114th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 2129 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES April 30, 2015 Mr. Price of North Carolina introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services A BILL To strengthen the disclosure requirements for creditors under the Truth in Lending Act.

1. Short title This Act may be cited as the Online Credit Card Disclosure Act of 2015 . 2. Online payment timing disclosures Section 127(b)(11)(D) of the Truth in Lending Act ( 15 U.S.C. 1637(b)(11)(D) ) is amended— (1) in clause (i), by striking ; and and inserting a semicolon; (2) in clause (ii), by striking the period and inserting ; and ; and (3) by inserting at the end the following new clause: (iii) if the consumer has an online account with the creditor under the consumer credit plan, be disclosed in a conspicuous and prominent location on a webpage of such creditor. .
IB 114th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 2131 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES AN ACT To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located at 83 Meeting Street in Charleston, South Carolina, as the J. Waties Waring Judicial Center .

1. J. Waties Waring Federal building and United States courthouse (a) Designation The Federal building and United States courthouse located at 83 Meeting Street in Charleston, South Carolina, shall be known and designated as the J. Waties Waring Judicial Center . (b) References Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other record of the United States to the Federal building and United States courthouse referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the J. Waties Waring Judicial Center .

Passed the House of Representatives June 15, 2015. Karen L. Haas, Clerk.
IB One Hundred Fourteenth Congress of the United States of America At the First Session Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday, the sixth day of January, two thousand and fifteen H. R. 2131 AN ACT To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located at 83 Meeting Street in Charleston, South Carolina, as the J. Waties Waring Judicial Center .

1. J. Waties Waring Federal building and United States courthouse (a) Designation The Federal building and United States courthouse located at 83 Meeting Street in Charleston, South Carolina, shall be known and designated as the J. Waties Waring Judicial Center . (b) References Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other record of the United States to the Federal building and United States courthouse referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the J. Waties Waring Judicial Center .

Speaker of the House of Representatives. Vice President of the United States and President of the Senate.
I 114th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 2131 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES April 30, 2015 Mr. Clyburn (for himself, Mr. Sanford , Mr. Wilson of South Carolina , Mr. Duncan of South Carolina , Mr. Gowdy , Mr. Mulvaney , and Mr. Rice of South Carolina ) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure A BILL To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located at 83 Meeting Street in Charleston, South Carolina, as the J. Waties Waring Judicial Center .

1. J. Waties Waring Federal building and United States courthouse (a) Designation The Federal building and United States courthouse located at 83 Meeting Street in Charleston, South Carolina, shall be known and designated as the J. Waties Waring Judicial Center . (b) References Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other record of the United States to the Federal building and United States courthouse referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the J. Waties Waring Judicial Center .
IIB 114th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 2131 IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES June 16, 2015 Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works AN ACT To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located at 83 Meeting Street in Charleston, South Carolina, as the J. Waties Waring Judicial Center .

1. J. Waties Waring Federal building and United States courthouse (a) Designation The Federal building and United States courthouse located at 83 Meeting Street in Charleston, South Carolina, shall be known and designated as the J. Waties Waring Judicial Center . (b) References Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other record of the United States to the Federal building and United States courthouse referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the J. Waties Waring Judicial Center .

Passed the House of Representatives June 15, 2015. Karen L. Haas, Clerk
IB House Calendar No. 38 114th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 2131 [Report No. 114–137] IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES April 30, 2015 Mr. Clyburn (for himself, Mr. Sanford , Mr. Wilson of South Carolina , Mr. Duncan of South Carolina , Mr. Gowdy , Mr. Mulvaney , and Mr. Rice of South Carolina ) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure June 4, 2015 Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed A BILL To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located at 83 Meeting Street in Charleston, South Carolina, as the J. Waties Waring Judicial Center .

1. J. Waties Waring Federal building and United States courthouse (a) Designation The Federal building and United States courthouse located at 83 Meeting Street in Charleston, South Carolina, shall be known and designated as the J. Waties Waring Judicial Center . (b) References Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other record of the United States to the Federal building and United States courthouse referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the J. Waties Waring Judicial Center .

June 4, 2015 Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
I 114th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 2133 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES April 30, 2015 Mr. Flores (for himself, Mr. Takano , Mr. Sires , Mr. Costello of Pennsylvania , Mr. Wenstrup , and Mr. Carter of Texas ) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services A BILL To amend title 10, United States Code, to provide additional training opportunities under the Transition Assistance Program to members of the Armed Forces who are being separated from active duty.

1. Short title This Act may be cited as the Servicemembers’ Choice in Transition Act . 2. Availability of additional training opportunities under Transition Assistance Program Section 1144 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection: (f) Additional training opportunities (1) Beginning not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this subsection, as part of the program carried out under this section, the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Homeland Security shall permit a member of the armed forces eligible for assistance under the program to elect to receive additional training in any of the following subjects: (A) Preparation for higher education or training. (B) Preparation for career or technical training. (C) Preparation for entrepreneurship. (D) Other training options determined by the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Homeland Security. (2) The Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Homeland Security shall ensure that a member of the armed forces who elects to receive additional training in subjects available under paragraph (1) is able to receive the training. .
I 114th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 2134 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES April 30, 2015 Mr. Olson introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources A BILL To amend the Endangered Species Act of 1973 to require review of the economic cost of adding a species to the list of endangered species or threatened species, and for other purposes.

1. Short title This Act may be cited as the Listing Reform Act . 2. Consideration of economic cost in review of listing petitions under Endangered Species Act of 1973 (a) Consideration required Section 4(b)(3) of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 ( 16 U.S.C. 1533(b)(3) ) is amended— (1) in subparagraph (A)— (A) by striking To the maximum extent practicable, within 90 days after and inserting (i) After ; and (B) by adding at the end the following: (ii) The Secretary may prioritize the consideration of petitions under this subparagraph other than in the order in which the petitions are received, except the Secretary may not give general priority to petitions to add species to such a list over petitions to remove a species from such a list. ; (2) in subparagraph (B)— (A) in the matter preceding clause (i), by striking Within 12 months and inserting As expeditiously as practicable ; and (b) Consideration of significant, cumulative economic effects (1) In general Section 4(b)(3)(B) of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 ( 16 U.S.C. 1533(b)(3)(B) ) is amended by adding at the end the following: (iv) (I) In the case of a petition to add a species to a list of threatened species, the petitioned action may be warranted but is precluded due to the likelihood of significant, cumulative economic effects that would result from listing or, to the extent it can be determined, from the likely resulting designation of critical habitat of the species. (II) The Secretary may not reconsider such finding unless— (aa) the Secretary determines there is endangerment of extinction of the species; or (bb) the Secretary receives a new petition to add such species to such list that includes a written qualitative and quantitative analyses reexamining the incremental and significant, cumulative economic effects of likely actions to protect the petitioned species and its potential habitat upon each State and locality that is affected by the petitioned species listing and that, in the opinion of the Secretary, credibly concludes that alternative actions are possible other than those resulting in significant, cumulative economic effects. (III) In this clause the term significant, cumulative economic effects includes economic effects on— (aa) public land and, to the maximum extent practicable, private land and property values; (bb) the provision of water, power, or other public services; (cc) employment; and (dd) revenues available for State and local governments. . (2) Conforming amendment Section 4(b)(1) of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 ( 16 U.S.C. 1533(b)(1) ) is amended by inserting (except as provided in clause (iv) of paragraph (3)(B)) after solely .
I 114th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 2135 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES April 30, 2015 Mr. Sam Johnson of Texas (for himself, Mr. Boustany , Mr. Reed , Mr. Young of Indiana , and Mrs. Black ) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means A BILL To amend titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act to provide certain individuals with information on employment support services.

1. Short title This Act may be cited as the Promoting Opportunity for Disability Benefit Applicants Act . 2. Providing information on public or private employment support services (a) Amendment to title II Title II of the Social Security Act ( 42 U.S.C. 401 et seq. ) is amended by inserting after section 218 the following: 219. Information on employment support services The Commissioner of Social Security may provide individuals who are denied benefits under this title based on an adverse determination of disability information on appropriate public or private entities that provide employment services, vocational rehabilitation services, or other support services. . (b) Amendment to title XVI Section 1615 of such Act ( 42 U.S.C. 1382d ) is amended by inserting after subsection (a) the following: (b) The Commissioner of Social Security may provide individuals who are denied benefits under this title based on an adverse determination of disability information on appropriate public or private entities that provide employment services, vocational rehabilitation services, or other support services. . (c) Effective date The amendments made by subsections (a) and (b) shall apply with respect to applications for monthly benefits filed on or after the date that is 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act.
I 114th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 2136 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES April 30, 2015 Mr. Sam Johnson of Texas (for himself, Mr. Kelly of Pennsylvania , Mr. Reed , Mr. Young of Indiana , and Mrs. Black ) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means A BILL To amend titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act to provide for quality reviews of benefit decisions, and for other purposes.

1. Short title This Act may be cited as the Improving the Quality of Disability Decisions Act of 2015 . 2. Pre-effectuation and post-effectuation quality reviews of hearing dispositions (a) Amendment to title II Section 205(b) of the Social Security Act ( 42 U.S.C. 405(b) ) is amended by adding at the end the following: (4) (A) The Commissioner of Social Security shall conduct pre-effectuation and post-effectuation quality reviews of hearing dispositions with respect to decisions in connection with applications for benefits under this title, in a sufficient number to ensure compliance with laws, regulations, and other guidance issued by the Commissioner of Social Security. (B) The Commissioner of Social Security shall annually submit to the Committee on Ways and Means of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Finance of the Senate a report that includes— (i) the total number of cases selected for a quality review as described in subparagraph (A); (ii) the number of such cases in which a decision is remanded; and (iii) the number of such cases in which a decision is modified or reversed. . (b) Amendment to title XVI Section 1633 of the Social Security Act ( 42 U.S.C. 1383b ) is amended by adding at the end the following: (f) (1) The Commissioner of Social Security shall conduct pre-effectuation and post-effectuation quality reviews of hearing dispositions with respect to decisions in connection with applications for benefits under this title, in a sufficient number to ensure compliance with laws, regulations, and other guidance issued by the Commissioner of Social Security. (2) The Commissioner of Social Security shall annually submit to the Committee on Ways and Means of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Finance of the Senate a report that includes— (A) the total number of cases selected for a quality review as described in paragraph (1); (B) the number of such cases in which a decision is remanded; and (C) the number of such cases in which a decision is modified or reversed. .