IB Union Calendar No. 103 113th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 1564 [Report No. 113–142] IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES April 15, 2013 Mr. Hurt (for himself and Mr. Meeks ) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services July 8, 2013 Additional sponsors: Mr. Huizenga of Michigan , Mr. Royce , Mr. Ross , Mr. Mulvaney , Mr. Bachus , Mr. Stivers , Mr. Garrett , Mr. Luetkemeyer , Mr. Murphy of Florida , Ms. Moore , Mr. David Scott of Georgia , and Mr. Peters of Michigan July 8, 2013 Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printed Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert the part printed in italic A BILL To amend the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 to prohibit the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board from requiring public companies to use specific auditors or require the use of different auditors on a rotating basis.

1. Short title This Act may be cited as the Audit Integrity and Job Protection Act . 2. Limitation on authority relating to auditors Section 103 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 ( 15 U.S.C. 7213 ) is amended by adding at the end the following: (e) Limitation on authority The Board shall have no authority under this title to require that audits conducted for a particular issuer in accordance with the standards set forth under this section be conducted by specific auditors, or that such audits be conducted for an issuer by different auditors on a rotating basis. .

1. Short title This Act may be cited as the Audit Integrity and Job Protection Act . 2. Limitation on authority relating to auditors Section 103 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 ( 15 U.S.C. 7213 ) is amended by adding at the end the following: (e) Limitation on authority The Board shall have no authority under this title to require that audits conducted for a particular issuer in accordance with the standards set forth under this section be conducted by specific auditors, or that such audits be conducted for an issuer by different auditors on a rotating basis. . 3. Study of mandatory rotation of registered public accounting firms (a) Study and Review Required The Comptroller General of the United States shall update its November 2003 report entitled Study on the Potential Effects of Mandatory Audit Firm Rotation , and review the potential effects, including the costs and benefits, of requiring the mandatory rotation of registered public accounting firms. In addition, the update shall include a study of— (1) whether mandatory rotation of registered public accounting firms would mitigate against potential conflicts of interest between public accounting firms and issuers; (2) whether mandatory rotation of registered public accounting firms would impair audit quality due to the loss of loss of industry or company-specific knowledge gained by a public accounting firm through years of experience auditing the issuer; and (3) what affect the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has had on registered public accounting firms’ independence and whether additional independence reforms are needed. (b) Report Required Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General shall submit a report to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs of the Senate and the Committee on Financial Services of the House of Representatives on the results of the study and review required by this section. (c) Definition For purposes of this section, the term mandatory rotation refers to the imposition of a limit on the period of years in which a particular registered public accounting firm may be the auditor of record for a particular issuer.

July 8, 2013 Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printed