IB Union Calendar No. 323 113th CONGRESS 2d Session H. R. 4292 [Report No. 113–435] IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES March 25, 2014 Mr. Chabot (for himself, Mr. Conyers , Mr. Goodlatte , and Mr. Cohen ) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary May 6, 2014 Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union and ordered to be printed A BILL To amend chapter 97 of title 28, United States Code, to clarify the exception to foreign sovereign immunity set forth in section 1605(a)(3) of such title.

1. Short title This Act may be cited as the Foreign Cultural Exchange Jurisdictional Immunity Clarification Act . 2. Clarification of jurisdictional immunity of foreign states (a) In general Section 1605 of title 28, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following: (h) Jurisdictional immunity for certain art exhibition activities (1) In general If— (A) a work is imported into the United States from any foreign country pursuant to an agreement that provides for the temporary exhibition or display of such work entered into between a foreign state that is the owner or custodian of such work and the United States or one or more cultural or educational institutions within the United States, (B) the President, or the President’s designee, has determined, in accordance with subsection (a) of Public Law 89–259 ( 22 U.S.C. 2459(a) ), that such work is of cultural significance and the temporary exhibition or display of such work is in the national interest, and (C) the notice thereof has been published in accordance with subsection (a) of Public Law 89–259 ( 22 U.S.C. 2459(a) ), any activity in the United States of such foreign state, or of any carrier, that is associated with the temporary exhibition or display of such work shall not be considered to be commercial activity by such foreign state for purposes of subsection (a)(3). (2) Nazi-era claims Paragraph (1) shall not apply in any case asserting jurisdiction under subsection (a)(3) in which rights in property taken in violation of international law are in issue within the meaning of that subsection and— (A) the property at issue is the work described in paragraph (1); (B) the action is based upon a claim that such work was taken in connection with the acts of a covered government during the covered period; (C) the court determines that the activity associated with the exhibition or display is commercial activity, as that term is defined in section 1603(d); and (D) a determination under subparagraph (C) is necessary for the court to exercise jurisdiction over the foreign state under subsection (a)(3). (3) Definitions For purposes of this subsection— (A) the term work means a work of art or other object of cultural significance; (B) the term covered government means— (i) the Government of Germany during the covered period; (ii) any government in any area in Europe that was occupied by the military forces of the Government of Germany during the covered period; (iii) any government in Europe that was established with the assistance or cooperation of the Government of Germany during the covered period; and (iv) any government in Europe that was an ally of the Government of Germany during the covered period; and (C) the term covered period means the period beginning on January 30, 1933, and ending on May 8, 1945. . (b) Effective date The amendment made by this section shall apply to any civil action commenced on or after the date of the enactment of this Act.

May 6, 2014 Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union and ordered to be printed