hyperdemocracy/usc-textversion huggingface dataset:
IIB 113th CONGRESS 2d Session H. R. 1216 IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES June 18, 2014 Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs AN ACT To designate the Department of Veterans Affairs Vet Center in Prescott, Arizona, as the Dr. Cameron McKinley Department of Veterans Affairs Veterans Center .

1. Findings Congress finds the following: (1) Dr. Cameron K. McKinley was born on December 9, 1930, in Shreveport, Louisiana. (2) Dr. McKinley served in the U.S. Marine Corps Reserve in Shreveport, Louisiana, from 1947 to 1949. (3) Dr. McKinley served valiantly at Wiesbaden Air Force Hospital during and after the Vietnam War, providing therapy to military personnel and their families. (4) Dr. McKinley served with great distinction as the Chief of Psychology at the Veterans Affairs Hospital in Prescott, Arizona, from 1981–1995. (5) At the Prescott Veterans Affairs Hospital, Dr. McKinley organized a Rap Group for Vietnam Era veterans dealing with various degrees of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). That group of veterans formed the Vietnam Veterans of America, Chapter 95. (6) Vietnam Veterans of America, Chapter 95, in concert with Dr. McKinley, local leaders, businesses and nonprofit groups petitioned the Federal Government for a free-standing Veterans Affairs Medical Center (VAMC). (7) Congress authorized 91 new rural VAMCs, among them the Prescott Vet Center. In June of 1985, the Prescott Vet Center opened. (8) Dr. McKinley spent decades confronting the pressing issue of PTSD by providing cutting-edge psychological and neuropsychological assessments to the returning veterans of three wars. He produced targeted action plans for veterans suffering from PTSD, giving them tools to deal with their afflictions and transition successfully back into civilian life. (9) Dr. McKinley’s cutting-edge work has earned him recognition from Prescott VAMC, Vietnam Veterans of America, the Veterans’ Readjustment Counseling Center, and the Department of the Army for his outstanding work to improve the lives of veterans of multiple generations. (10) It is only well and fitting that as a tribute to this remarkable person’s life that Congress seek to name the facility after the leader who was its inspiration and a lifesaver for so many. 2. Dr. Cameron McKinley Department of Veterans Affairs Veterans Center (a) Designation The Department of Veterans Affairs Vet Center located at 3180 Stillwater Dr. #A, Prescott, Arizona, shall after the date of the enactment of this Act be known and designated as the Dr. Cameron McKinley Department of Veterans Affairs Veterans Center . (b) References Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other record of the United States to the Department of Veterans Affairs Vet Center referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the Dr. Cameron McKinley Department of Veterans Affairs Veterans Center .

Passed the House of Representatives June 17, 2014. Karen L. Haas, Clerk
I 113th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 1217 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES March 15, 2013 Mr. Becerra (for himself and Ms. Ros-Lehtinen ) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on House Administration , and in addition to the Committees on Transportation and Infrastructure and Natural Resources , for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned A BILL To establish within the Smithsonian Institution the Smithsonian American Latino Museum, and for other purposes.

1. Short title This Act may be cited as the Smithsonian American Latino Museum Act . 2. Establishment of museum There is established within the Smithsonian Institution a museum to be known as the Smithsonian American Latino Museum . 3. Location and authorization (a) Arts and Industries Building The Arts and Industries Building of the Smithsonian Institution, located on the National Mall at 900 Jefferson Drive, Southwest, Washington, District of Columbia, including a new underground annex facility, is designated as the location of the Smithsonian American Latino Museum. (b) Planning and Construction The Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution, in consultation with the Secretary of the Interior, the Commission of Fine Arts, and the National Capital Planning Commission, and with other appropriate Federal and local agencies, is authorized to prepare plans, design, renovate, rehabilitate, and construct the Smithsonian American Latino Museum facility, as referred to in the May 2011 Report to Congress of the Commission to Study the Potential Creation of a National Museum of the American Latino. (c) Schedule and funding (1) In general The Board of Regents is authorized to prepare a plan of action for the Smithsonian American Latino Museum, and to identify and evaluate viable funding models for both construction and operation of the Museum. (2) Timing The plan of action authorized in paragraph (1) shall be concluded not later than 18 months after the date of enactment of this Act. 4. Agreement with Secretary of the interior The Secretary of the Interior and the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution shall enter into an agreement that— (1) allows for the planning, design, and construction of the underground annex facility by the Board of Regents, in a manner harmonious with and to protect the open space and visual sightlines of the Mall; and (2) provides a timeline for the transfer of administrative jurisdiction, if necessary, of the appropriate subsurface area from the Secretary of the Interior to the Smithsonian Institution. 5. Consideration of recommendations of commission In carrying out its duties under this Act, the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution shall take into consideration the reports and plans submitted by the Commission to Study the Potential Creation of a National Museum of the American Latino under section 333 of the Consolidated Natural Resources Act of 2008 ( Public Law 110–229 ; 122 Stat. 784).
I 113th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 1218 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES March 15, 2013 Mr. Amash (for himself, Mr. Duncan of South Carolina , Mr. LaMalfa , and Mr. Massie ) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services A BILL To prohibit the payment of surcharges for commemorative coin programs to private organizations or entities, and for other purposes.

1. Short title This Act may be cited as the Commemorative Coins Reform Act of 2013 . 2. Prohibition on payment of surcharges to non-Federal entities Section 5134(f) of title 31, United States Code, is amended to read as follows: (f) Prohibition on payment of surcharges to organizations outside of the Federal Government (1) In general Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no surcharges collected with respect to the sale of any numismatic item may be paid to any organization outside of the Federal Government, other than with respect to the costs of producing and selling such item. (2) Payment of costs Surcharges collected in connection with the sale of any numismatic item shall be used to recover all numismatic operation and program costs allocable to the program under which such numismatic item is produced and sold. (3) Excess deposited into Treasury Amounts of surcharges collected in excess of the amounts described in paragraph (2) shall be transferred by the Fund to the general fund of the Treasury for the purpose of deficit reduction. . 3. Applicability Subsection (f) of section 5134, United States Code, as amended by this Act, shall apply with respect to any commemorative coin program established or numismatic item produced pursuant to an Act enacted on or after the date of enactment of this Act.
I 113th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 1220 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES March 15, 2013 Mr. Burgess (for himself, Mr. Dingell , and Mr. Matheson ) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce A BILL To direct the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency to allow for the distribution, sale, and consumption in the United States of remaining inventories of over-the-counter CFC epinephrine inhalers.

1. Short title This Act may be cited as the Asthma Inhalers Relief Act of 2013 . 2. Distribution, sale, and consumption of remaining inventories of over-the-counter CFC epinephrine inhalers (a) In general The Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency— (1) shall allow for the distribution, sale, and consumption in the United States of remaining inventories of CFC epinephrine inhalers manufactured pursuant to the exception for medical devices under section 604(d)(2) of the Clean Air Act ( 42 U.S.C. 7671c(d)(2) ); (2) shall not take any enforcement action or otherwise seek to restrict the distribution, sale, or consumption of such inhalers on the basis of any Federal law implementing the Montreal Protocol; and (3) shall, in response to any request of any distributor or seller of such inhalers, including any such request pending on the date of the enactment of this Act, issue a No Action Assurance Letter to the requesting party stating that the Environmental Protection Agency will not initiate an enforcement action relating to the distribution or sale of any such inhaler occurring prior to August 1, 2013. (b) Rule of construction Nothing in this Act shall be construed to limit or otherwise affect the authority of the Food and Drug Administration under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 301 et seq.) to ensure the safety and effectiveness of CFC epinephrine inhalers to be distributed, sold, or consumed pursuant to this Act. (c) Definitions In this Act: (1) The term CFC epinephrine inhaler means any epinephrine inhaler containing chlo­ro­fluo­ro­car­bons that was manufactured and classified as over-the-counter before January 1, 2012. (2) The phrase Federal law implementing the Montreal Protocol — (A) means any provision of title VI of the Clean Air Act ( 42 U.S.C. 7671 et seq. ) or other Federal law implementing the Montreal Protocol; and (B) includes the final rule published by the Food and Drug Administration entitled Use of Ozone-Depleting Substances; Removal of Essential-Use Designation (Epinephrine) published in the Federal Register at 73 Federal Register 69532 (November 19, 2008). (3) The term Montreal Protocol has the meaning given such term in section 601 of the Clean Air Act ( 42 U.S.C. 7671 ). (4) The term over-the-counter means not subject to section 503(b)(1) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act ( 21 U.S.C. 353(b)(1) ) or otherwise required pursuant to Federal law to be dispensed only upon issuance of a prescription. (d) Sunset This section ceases to be effective August 1, 2013.
I 113th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 1225 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES March 15, 2013 Mr. Larsen of Washington introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources A BILL To direct the Secretary of the Interior to place certain lands in Skagit and San Juan Counties, Washington, into trust for the Samish Indian Nation, and for other purposes.

1. Short title This Act may be cited as the Samish Indian Nation Homelands Act of 2013 . 2. Definitions (a) Parcels The term parcels means the 16 parcels of approximately 95 acres of land owned by the Tribe, located in Skagit County and San Juan County, Washington, and depicted on the Map. (b) Map The term Map means the map titled the Samish Indian Nation Homeland Map dated June 20, 2012. (c) Secretary The term Secretary means the Secretary of the Interior. (d) Tribe The term Tribe means the Samish Indian Nation, a federally recognized Indian Tribe. 3. Land into trust (a) Action by the Secretary of the Interior (1) Fulfillment of conditions On fulfillment of each condition described in paragraph (2), and in accordance with the regulations of the Department of the Interior for implementing the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) that are applicable to trust land acquisitions for Indian tribes that are mandated by Federal legislation, the Secretary shall take the land described in the Map into trust for the benefit of the Tribe. (2) Conditions The conditions referred to in paragraph (1) are that the Tribe shall— (A) convey to the Secretary all right, title, and interest in and to the parcels of land described in the Map; and (B) submit to the Secretary a request to take the parcels of land described in the Map into trust for the Tribe. (b) Survey (1) Responsibility for survey The Tribe shall conduct a survey of the boundaries of the parcels described in the Map and designated for the Tribe and submit the survey to the Bureau of Indian Affairs. (2) Approval of survey (A) Not later than 90 days after the date on which the survey is submitted under this subsection, the Director of the Bureau of Indian Affairs shall complete a review of the survey, and provide the Tribe with notice of concurrence of the survey. (B) Not later than 120 days after the date on which concurrence is provided to the Tribe, the Secretary shall submit a copy of the survey to the appropriate Committees of Congress, and make the survey available to the public at the appropriate office of the Secretary. (c) Effect of Act Nothing in this Act limits the existing rights or claims of the Samish Indian Nation. 4. Hunting, fishing, trapping, and gathering This Act shall not grant, restore, or diminish any hunting, fishing, trapping or gathering treaty right of any tribe. 5. Gaming prohibition The Tribe may not conduct on any land taken into trust pursuant to this Act any gaming activities— (1) as a matter of claimed inherent authority; or (2) under any Federal law (including the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act ( 25 U.S.C. 2701 et seq. ) (including any regulations promulgated by the Secretary or the National Indian Gaming Commission pursuant to that Act)).
I 113th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 1226 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES March 15, 2013 Mrs. Noem (for herself, Mr. Kline , Mr. Gosar , Mr. Cramer , Mr. Cole , and Mr. Calvert ) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce A BILL To clarify the rights of Indians and Indian tribes on Indian lands under the National Labor Relations Act.

1. Short title This Act may be cited as the Tribal Labor Sovereignty Act of 2013 . 2. Definition of employer Section 2 of the National Labor Relations Act ( 29 U.S.C. 152 ) is amended— (1) in paragraph (2), by inserting or any enterprise or institution owned and operated by an Indian tribe and located on its Indian lands, after subdivision thereof ; and (2) by adding at the end the following: (15) The term Indian tribe means any Indian tribe, band, nation, pueblo, or other organized group or community which is recognized as eligible for the special programs and services provided by the United States to Indians because of their status as Indians. (16) The term Indian means any individual who is a member of an Indian tribe. (17) The term Indian lands means— (A) all lands within the limits of any Indian reservation; (B) any lands title to which is either held in trust by the United States for the benefit of any Indian tribe or individual or held by any Indian tribe or individual subject to restriction by the United States against alienation; and (C) any lands in the State of Oklahoma that are within the boundaries of a former reservation (as defined by the Secretary of the Interior) of a federally recognized Indian tribe. .
I 113th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 1227 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES March 15, 2013 Mr. Paulsen (for himself, Mr. Quigley , Mr. Renacci , and Mr. Delaney ) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary A BILL To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to authorize certain aliens who have earned a Ph.D. degree from a United States institution of higher education in a field of science, technology, engineering, or mathematics to be admitted for permanent residence and to be exempted from the numerical limitations on H–1B nonimmigrants.

1. Short title This Act may be cited as the Stopping Trained in America Ph.D.s From Leaving the Economy Act of 2013 or the STAPLE Act . 2. Exemption from numerical limitations on permanent residents for certain United States educated immigrants (a) Aliens not subject to direct numerical limitations Section 201(b)(1) of the Immigration and Nationality Act ( 8 U.S.C. 1151(b)(1) ) is amended by adding at the end the following: (F) Aliens who have earned a Ph.D. degree from a United States institution of higher education (as defined in section 101(a) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1001(a))) in a field of science, technology, engineering, or mathematics and who have an offer of employment from a United States employer in a field related to such degree. . (b) Procedure for granting immigrant status Section 204(a)(1)(F) of the Immigration and Nationality Act ( 8 U.S.C. 1154(a)(1)(F) ) is amended— (1) by striking or after 203(b)(2), ; (2) by inserting , or 201(b)(1)(F) after 203(b)(3) ; and (3) by striking Attorney General and inserting Secretary of Homeland Security . 3. Exemption from H–1B numerical limitation for certain United States educated nonimmigrants Section 214(g)(5) of the Immigration and Nationality Act ( 8 U.S.C. 1184(g)(5) ) is amended— (1) in subparagraph (B), by striking or at the end; (2) in subparagraph (C), by striking the period at the end and inserting a semicolon; and (3) by adding at the end the following: (D) has earned a Ph.D. degree from a United States institution of higher education (as defined in section 101(a) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 ( 20 U.S.C. 1001(a) )) in a field of science, technology, engineering, or mathematics and with respect to whom the petitioning employer requires such education as a condition for the employment. .
I 113th CONGRESS 2d Session H. R. 1228 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES AN ACT To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 123 South 9 th Street in De Pere, Wisconsin, as the Corporal Justin D. Ross Post Office Building .

1. Corporal Justin D. Ross Post Office Building (a) Designation The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 123 South 9 th Street in De Pere, Wisconsin, shall be known and designated as the Corporal Justin D. Ross Post Office Building . (b) References Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the Corporal Justin D. Ross Post Office Building .

Passed the House of Representatives March 26, 2014. Karen L. Haas, Clerk.
I One Hundred Thirteenth Congress of the United States of America At the Second Session Begun and held at the City of Washington on Friday, the third day of January, two thousand and fourteen H. R. 1228 AN ACT To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 123 South 9 th Street in De Pere, Wisconsin, as the Corporal Justin D. Ross Post Office Building .

1. Corporal Justin D. Ross Post Office Building (a) Designation The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 123 South 9 th Street in De Pere, Wisconsin, shall be known and designated as the Corporal Justin D. Ross Post Office Building . (b) References Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the Corporal Justin D. Ross Post Office Building .

Speaker of the House of Representatives. Vice President of the United States and President of the Senate.
I 113th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 1228 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES March 15, 2013 Mr. Ribble (for himself, Mr. Petri , Mr. Ryan of Wisconsin , Mr. Duffy , Mr. Kind , Ms. Moore , Mr. Pocan , and Mr. Sensenbrenner ) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform A BILL To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 300 Packerland Drive in Green Bay, Wisconsin, as the Corporal Justin D. Ross Post Office Building .

1. Corporal Justin D. Ross Post Office Building (a) Designation The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 300 Packerland Drive in Green Bay, Wisconsin, shall be known and designated as the Corporal Justin D. Ross Post Office Building . (b) References Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the Corporal Justin D. Ross Post Office Building .
IIB 113th CONGRESS 2d Session H. R. 1228 IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES March 27, 2014 Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs AN ACT To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 123 South 9 th Street in De Pere, Wisconsin, as the Corporal Justin D. Ross Post Office Building .

1. Corporal Justin D. Ross Post Office Building (a) Designation The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 123 South 9 th Street in De Pere, Wisconsin, shall be known and designated as the Corporal Justin D. Ross Post Office Building . (b) References Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the Corporal Justin D. Ross Post Office Building .

Passed the House of Representatives March 26, 2014. Karen L. Haas, Clerk
II Calendar No. 386 113th CONGRESS 2d Session H. R. 1228 IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES March 27, 2014 Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs May 21, 2014 Reported by Mr. Carper , without amendment AN ACT To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 123 South 9 th Street in De Pere, Wisconsin, as the Corporal Justin D. Ross Post Office Building .

1. Corporal Justin D. Ross Post Office Building (a) Designation The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 123 South 9 th Street in De Pere, Wisconsin, shall be known and designated as the Corporal Justin D. Ross Post Office Building . (b) References Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the Corporal Justin D. Ross Post Office Building .

May 21, 2014 Reported without amendment
I 113th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 1230 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES March 15, 2013 Mr. Schrader (for himself, Mr. DeFazio , Mr. Blumenauer , and Ms. Bonamici ) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources A BILL To amend the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act to designate segments of the Molalla River in the State of Oregon, as components of the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System, and for other purposes.

1. Short title This Act may be cited as the Molalla River Wild and Scenic Rivers Act . 2. Designation of wild and scenic river segments, Molalla River, Oregon Section 3(a) of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act ( 16 U.S.C. 1274(a) ) is amended by adding at the end the following: (___) Molalla river, Oregon (A) In general The following segments in the State of Oregon, to be administered by the Secretary of the Interior as a recreational river: (i) Molalla river The approximately 15.1-mile segment from the southern boundary line of T. 7 S., R. 4 E., sec. 19, downstream to the edge of the Bureau of Land Management boundary in T. 6 S., R. 3 E., sec. 7. (ii) Table Rock Fork Molalla River The approximately 6.2-mile segment from the easternmost Bureau of Land Management boundary line in the NE 1/4 sec. 4, T. 7 S., R. 4 E., downstream to the confluence with the Molalla River. (B) Withdrawal Subject to valid existing rights, the Federal land within the boundaries of the river segments designated by subparagraph (A) is withdrawn from all forms of— (i) entry, appropriation, or disposal under the public land laws; (ii) location, entry, and patent under the mining laws; and (iii) disposition under all laws relating to mineral and geothermal leasing or mineral materials. . 3. Technical corrections Section 3(a)(102) of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act ( 16 U.S.C. 1274(a)(102) ) is amended— (1) in the heading, by striking Squaw Creek and inserting Whychus Creek ; (2) in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), by striking McAllister Ditch, including the Soap Fork Squaw Creek, the North Fork, the South Fork, the East and West Forks of Park Creek, and Park Creek Fork and inserting Plainview Ditch, including the Soap Creek, the North and South Forks of Whychus Creek, the East and West Forks of Park Creek, and Park Creek ; and (3) in subparagraph (B), by striking McAllister Ditch and inserting Plainview Ditch .
I 113th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 1231 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES March 15, 2013 Mr. Schweikert introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means A BILL To provide that the President shall submit to Congress a report detailing the priority of Federal spending if the statutory debt limit is reached, and for other purposes.

1. Short title This Act may be cited as the Transparency on Prioritizing Spending Act . 2. Priority of spending if the debt ceiling is reached Not later than 30 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the President shall submit to Congress a report listing, in descending order of prioritization, which obligations of the United States Government will be paid in the event that the debt of the United States Government, as defined in section 3101 of title 31, United States Code, reaches the statutory limit.
113th CONGRESS 2d Session H.R. 1233 In the Senate of the United States, September 10, 2014. Amendments:

That the bill from the House of Representatives (H.R. 1233) entitled An Act to amend chapter 22 of title 44, United States Code, popularly known as the Presidential Records Act, to establish procedures for the consideration of claims of constitutionally based privilege against disclosure of Presidential records, and for other purposes. , do pass with the following (1) On page 5, line 7, strike of and insert on . (2) On page 10 from line 8 through page 11 line 1, strike all and insert: (a) In general The President, the Vice President, or a covered employee may not create or send a Presidential or Vice Presidential record using a non-official electronic message account unless the President, Vice President, or covered employee— (1) copies an official electronic messaging account of the President, Vice President, or covered employee in the original creation or transmission of the Presidential record or Vice Presidential record; or (2) forwards a complete copy of the Presidential or Vice Presidential record to an official electronic messaging account of the President, Vice President, or covered employee not later than 20 days after the original creation or transmission of the Presidential or Vice Presidential record. (b) Adverse actions The intentional violation of subsection (a) by a covered employee (including any rules, regulations, or other implementing guidelines), as determined by the appropriate supervisor, shall be a basis for disciplinary action in accordance with subchapter I, II, or V of chapter 75 of title 5, as the case may be. (c) Definitions In this section: (1) Covered employee The term covered employee means— (A) the immediate staff of the President; (B) the immediate staff of the Vice President; (C) a unit or individual of the Executive Office of the President whose function is to advise and assist the President; and (D) a unit or individual of the Office of the Vice President whose function is to advise and assist the Vice President. (3) On page 11, line 2, strike 1 and insert 2 . (4) On page 11, line 6, strike 2 and insert 3 . (5) On page 11, line 9 through line 11, strike everything up to the first period. (6) On page 31, line 8, strike within five days and insert not later than 20 days .

Secretary
I 113th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 1235 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES March 18, 2013 Mrs. Hartzler (for herself, Mr. Cotton , Mr. Mullin , Mr. Lankford , Mr. Graves of Missouri , and Mr. Griffith of Virginia ) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce A BILL To amend the Federal Power Act to permit States to exempt projects from certain Federal Energy Regulatory Commission considerations in issuing licenses for such projects.

1. Short title This Act may be cited as the Leave our Lakes Alone Act . 2. State determination to exempt projects from certain FERC considerations in licensing Section 4 of the Federal Power Act ( 16 U.S.C. 797 ) is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection: (h) (1) For the purposes of this subsection— (A) the term exempt State means a State for which a State law is in effect that expressly authorizes paragraph (2) to apply to projects within the State; and (B) the term public use and environmental purposes means the purposes of energy conservation, the protection, mitigation of damage to, and enhancement of, fish and wildlife (including related spawning grounds and habitat), the protection of recreational opportunities, the preservation of other aspects of environmental quality, and other beneficial public uses, including irrigation, flood control, water supply, and other purposes, as required under subsection (e) and section 10(a), as such purposes apply to land within the project boundary that is above the highest target elevation for normal operations of the project. (2) Notwithstanding subsection (e) and sections 10(a) and 28, the Commission may not consider public use and environmental purposes in issuing a license for a project in an exempt State. (3) If a State law described in paragraph (1)(A) is no longer in effect, paragraph (2) shall continue to apply to any project in the State for which a license was issued while such law was in effect. (4) Paragraph (2) shall not apply to any project or portion of a project on Federal land. .
I 113th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 1236 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES March 18, 2013 Mr. Jones introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services A BILL To amend title 10, United States Code, to require the inclusion of a behavioral health professional on any physical evaluation board that considers issues of post-traumatic stress disorder, traumatic brain injury, or other mental health condition.

1. Inclusion of behavioral health professionals on physical evaluation boards Section 1222 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection: (d) Inclusion of behavioral health professional (1) If a physical evaluation board will consider issues related to post-traumatic stress disorder, traumatic brain injury, or other mental health condition, the physical evaluation board must include a behavioral health professional as a member of the board. The behavioral health professional shall serve in lieu of the medical member of the physical evaluation board unless, as a result of the health-related issues before the board, the board would benefit from the presence of both a behavioral health professional and medical member. (2) In this subsection, the term behavioral health professional means a clinical psychologist, psychiatrist, licensed clinical social worker, or psychiatric advanced practice registered nurse. .
I 113th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 1237 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES March 18, 2013 Mrs. Beatty introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services A BILL To authorize and request the President to award the Medal of Honor posthumously to Major Dominic S. Gentile of the United States Army Air Forces for acts of valor during World War II.

1. Authorization and request for award of Medal of Honor to Dominic S. Gentile for acts of valor during World War II (a) Findings Congress makes the following findings: (1) Major Dominic S. Gentile of the United States Army Air Forces destroyed at least 30 enemy aircraft during World War II, making him one of the highest scoring fighter pilots in American history and earning him the title of Ace of Aces . (2) Major Gentile was the first American fighter pilot to surpass Captain Eddie Rickenbacker’s WWI record of 26 enemy aircraft destroyed. (3) Major Gentile was awarded several medals in recognition of his acts of valor during World War II, including two Distinguished Service Crosses, seven Distinguished Flying Crosses, the Silver Star, the Air Medal, and received similar honors from Great Britain, Italy, Belgium, and Canada. (4) Major Gentile was born in Piqua, Ohio, and died January 23, 1951, after which he was posthumously appointed to the rank of major. (5) Major Gentile is buried in Columbus, Ohio. Gentile Air Force Station in Kettering, Ohio, is named in his honor and he was inducted into the National Aviation Hall of Fame in 1995. (b) Authorization Notwithstanding the time limitations specified in section 3744 of title 10, United States Code, or any other time limitation with respect to the awarding of certain medals to persons who served in the Armed Forces, the President is authorized and requested to award the Medal of Honor posthumously under section 3741 of such title to former Major Dominic S. Gentile of the United States Army Air Forces for the acts of valor during World War II described in subsection (c). (c) Acts of valor described The acts of valor referred to in subsection (b) are the actions of then Major Dominic S. Gentile who, as a pilot of a P–51 Mustang in the Army’s 336th Fighter Squadron, Fourth Fighter Group, of the Eighth Air Force in Europe during World War II, distinguished himself conspicuously by gallantry and intrepidity at the risk of his life above and beyond the call of duty by destroying at least 30 enemy aircraft during his service in the United State Army Air Forces.
I 113th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 1240 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES March 18, 2013 Ms. Chu (for herself, Ms. Meng , Mr. Payne , Mrs. Negrete McLeod , Ms. Bordallo , Mr. Schrader , Ms. Tsongas , Mr. Petri , and Mr. Bera of California ) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Small Business A BILL To extend the low-interest refinancing provisions under the Local Development Business Loan Program of the Small Business Administration.

1. Short title This Act may be cited as the Commercial Real Estate and Economic Development Act of 2013 or the CREED Act of 2013 . 2. Low-interest refinancing under the local development business loan program (a) Repeal Section 1122(b) of the Small Business Jobs Act of 2010 ( 15 U.S.C. 696 note) is repealed. (b) Restoration of Low-Interest Refinancing Provision Subparagraph (C) of section 502(7) of the Small Business Investment Act of 1958 ( 15 U.S.C. 696(7) ) (relating to refinancing not involving expansions), as in effect on September 25, 2012, shall be in effect during the period beginning on the date of enactment of this Act and ending 5 years after such date of enactment. 3. No additional appropriations authorized The amendments made by section 2 do not authorize any appropriations for the purpose of carrying out such amendment or the program it amends.
IB 113th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 1241 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES AN ACT To facilitate a land exchange involving certain National Forest System lands in the Inyo National Forest, and for other purposes.

1. Special rules for Inyo National Forest land exchange (a) Authority To accept lands outside boundaries of Inyo National Forest In any land exchange involving the conveyance of certain National Forest System land located within the boundaries of Inyo National Forest in California, as shown on the map titled Federal Parcel and dated June 2011, the Secretary of Agriculture may accept for acquisition in the exchange certain non-Federal lands in California lying outside the boundaries of Inyo National Forest, as shown on the maps titled DWP Parcel – Interagency Visitor Center Parcel and DWP Parcel – Town of Bishop Parcel and dated June 2011, if the Secretary determines that acquisition of the non-Federal lands is desirable for National Forest System purposes. (b) Cash equalization payment; use In an exchange described in subsection (a), the Secretary of Agriculture may accept a cash equalization payment in excess of 25 percent. Any such cash equalization payment shall be deposited into the account in the Treasury of the United States established by Public Law 90–171 (commonly known as the Sisk Act; 16 U.S.C. 484a ) and shall be made available to the Secretary for the acquisition of land for addition to the National Forest System. (c) Rule of construction Nothing in this section shall be construed to grant the Secretary of Agriculture new land exchange authority. This section modifies the use of land exchange authorities already available to the Secretary as of the date of the enactment of this Act.

Passed the House of Representatives December 3, 2013. Karen L. Haas, Clerk.
I 113th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 1241 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES March 18, 2013 Mr. Cook (for himself and Mr. McKeon ) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources A BILL To facilitate a land exchange involving certain National Forest System lands in the Inyo National Forest, and for other purposes.

1. Special rules for Inyo National Forest land exchange (a) Authority To accept lands outside boundaries of Inyo National Forest In any land exchange involving the conveyance of certain National Forest System land located within the boundaries of Inyo National Forest in California, as shown on the map titled Federal Parcel and dated June 2011, the Secretary of Agriculture may accept for acquisition in the exchange certain non-Federal lands in California lying outside the boundaries of Inyo National Forest, as shown on the maps titled DWP Parcel – Interagency Visitor Center Parcel and DWP Parcel – Town of Bishop Parcel and dated June 2011, if the Secretary determines that acquisition of the non-Federal lands is desirable for National Forest System purposes. (b) Cash equalization payment; use In an exchange described in subsection (a), the Secretary of Agriculture may accept a cash equalization payment in excess of 25 percent. Any such cash equalization payment shall be deposited into the account in the Treasury of the United States established by Public Law 90–171 (commonly known as the Sisk Act; 16 U.S.C. 484a ) and shall be made available to the Secretary for the acquisition of land for addition to the National Forest System. (c) Rule of construction Nothing in this section shall be construed to grant the Secretary of Agriculture new land exchange authority. This section modifies the use of land exchange authorities already available to the Secretary as of the date of the enactment of this Act.
IIB 113th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 1241 IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES December 9, 2013 Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources AN ACT To facilitate a land exchange involving certain National Forest System lands in the Inyo National Forest, and for other purposes.

1. Special rules for Inyo National Forest land exchange (a) Authority To accept lands outside boundaries of Inyo National Forest In any land exchange involving the conveyance of certain National Forest System land located within the boundaries of Inyo National Forest in California, as shown on the map titled Federal Parcel and dated June 2011, the Secretary of Agriculture may accept for acquisition in the exchange certain non-Federal lands in California lying outside the boundaries of Inyo National Forest, as shown on the maps titled DWP Parcel – Interagency Visitor Center Parcel and DWP Parcel – Town of Bishop Parcel and dated June 2011, if the Secretary determines that acquisition of the non-Federal lands is desirable for National Forest System purposes. (b) Cash equalization payment; use In an exchange described in subsection (a), the Secretary of Agriculture may accept a cash equalization payment in excess of 25 percent. Any such cash equalization payment shall be deposited into the account in the Treasury of the United States established by Public Law 90–171 (commonly known as the Sisk Act; 16 U.S.C. 484a ) and shall be made available to the Secretary for the acquisition of land for addition to the National Forest System. (c) Rule of construction Nothing in this section shall be construed to grant the Secretary of Agriculture new land exchange authority. This section modifies the use of land exchange authorities already available to the Secretary as of the date of the enactment of this Act.

Passed the House of Representatives December 3, 2013. Karen L. Haas, Clerk
IB Union Calendar No. 202 113th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 1241 [Report No. 113–281] IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES March 18, 2013 Mr. Cook (for himself and Mr. McKeon ) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources December 2, 2013 Additional sponsor: Mr. Costa December 2, 2013 Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union and ordered to be printed A BILL To facilitate a land exchange involving certain National Forest System lands in the Inyo National Forest, and for other purposes.

1. Special rules for Inyo National Forest land exchange (a) Authority To accept lands outside boundaries of Inyo National Forest In any land exchange involving the conveyance of certain National Forest System land located within the boundaries of Inyo National Forest in California, as shown on the map titled Federal Parcel and dated June 2011, the Secretary of Agriculture may accept for acquisition in the exchange certain non-Federal lands in California lying outside the boundaries of Inyo National Forest, as shown on the maps titled DWP Parcel – Interagency Visitor Center Parcel and DWP Parcel – Town of Bishop Parcel and dated June 2011, if the Secretary determines that acquisition of the non-Federal lands is desirable for National Forest System purposes. (b) Cash equalization payment; use In an exchange described in subsection (a), the Secretary of Agriculture may accept a cash equalization payment in excess of 25 percent. Any such cash equalization payment shall be deposited into the account in the Treasury of the United States established by Public Law 90–171 (commonly known as the Sisk Act; 16 U.S.C. 484a ) and shall be made available to the Secretary for the acquisition of land for addition to the National Forest System. (c) Rule of construction Nothing in this section shall be construed to grant the Secretary of Agriculture new land exchange authority. This section modifies the use of land exchange authorities already available to the Secretary as of the date of the enactment of this Act.

December 2, 2013 Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union and ordered to be printed
II Calendar No. 643 113th CONGRESS 2d Session H. R. 1241 [Report No. 113–303] IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES December 9, 2013 Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources December 10, 2014 Reported by Ms. Landrieu , without amendment AN ACT To facilitate a land exchange involving certain National Forest System lands in the Inyo National Forest, and for other purposes.

1. Special rules for Inyo National Forest land exchange (a) Authority To accept lands outside boundaries of Inyo National Forest In any land exchange involving the conveyance of certain National Forest System land located within the boundaries of Inyo National Forest in California, as shown on the map titled Federal Parcel and dated June 2011, the Secretary of Agriculture may accept for acquisition in the exchange certain non-Federal lands in California lying outside the boundaries of Inyo National Forest, as shown on the maps titled DWP Parcel – Interagency Visitor Center Parcel and DWP Parcel – Town of Bishop Parcel and dated June 2011, if the Secretary determines that acquisition of the non-Federal lands is desirable for National Forest System purposes. (b) Cash equalization payment; use In an exchange described in subsection (a), the Secretary of Agriculture may accept a cash equalization payment in excess of 25 percent. Any such cash equalization payment shall be deposited into the account in the Treasury of the United States established by Public Law 90–171 (commonly known as the Sisk Act; 16 U.S.C. 484a ) and shall be made available to the Secretary for the acquisition of land for addition to the National Forest System. (c) Rule of construction Nothing in this section shall be construed to grant the Secretary of Agriculture new land exchange authority. This section modifies the use of land exchange authorities already available to the Secretary as of the date of the enactment of this Act.

December 10, 2014 Reported without amendment
I 113th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 1242 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES March 18, 2013 Mr. Ribble introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Select Committee on Intelligence (Permanent Select) , and in addition to the Committees on the Judiciary and Armed Services , for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned A BILL To prohibit the use of drones to kill citizens of the United States within the United States.

1. Drones (a) Definitions In this section— (1) the term drone means an unmanned aircraft (as defined in section 331 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 ( 49 U.S.C. 40101 note)); (2) the term serious bodily injury has the meaning given that term in section 1365 of title 18, United States Code; and (3) the term United States as used in a territorial sense, has the meaning given that term in section 5 of title 18, United States Code. (b) Prohibition The Federal Government may not use a drone to kill a citizen of the United States who is located in the United States. The prohibition under this subsection shall not apply to an individual who poses an imminent threat of death or serious bodily injury to another individual. Nothing in this section shall be construed to suggest that the Constitution would otherwise allow the killing of a citizen of the United States in the United States without due process of law.
I 113th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 1244 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES March 19, 2013 Mr. Crawford (for himself, Mr. Griffin of Arkansas , Mr. Womack , and Mr. Cotton ) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce A BILL To amend the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch Act to provide flexibility to school food authorities in meeting certain nutritional requirements for the school lunch and breakfast programs, and for other purposes.

1. Short title This Act may be cited as the Sensible School Lunch Act . 2. Nutritional requirements for school lunch and breakfast programs (a) Additional reimbursement Section 4(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch Act (42 U.S.C. 1753(b)(3)(A)(ii)) is amended by adding at the end the following: (III) Maximum quantities The interim or final regulations required under this clause shall not establish a maximum quantity of grains, meat, or meat alternates that may be served in any meal or during any period of time of any school year. . (b) Rules Section 9(a)(4)(B) of the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch Act (42 U.S.C. 1758(a)(4)(B)) is amended— (1) by striking Not later and inserting the following: (i) In general Subject to clause (ii), not later ; and (2) by adding at the end the following: (ii) Maximum quantities The rules required under clause (ii) shall not establish a maximum quantity of grains, meat, or meat alternates that may be served in any meal or during any period of time of any school year. .