Safe and Accurate Food Labeling Act of 2015

Bill: 114-hr-1599
Sponsor: Rep. Pompeo, Mike [R-KS-4]
Introduced: 2015-03-25 in the House
Policy area: Agriculture and Food
Subjects: Administrative law and regulatory procedures
Agricultural practices and innovations
Business records
Department of Health and Human Services
Federal preemption
Food and Drug Administration (FDA)
Food supply, safety, and labeling
Fruit and vegetables
Genetics
Marketing and advertising

Summary:
action_date: 2015-03-25
text: 

Safe and Accurate Food Labeling Act of 2015

 
This bill amends the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to require the developer of a bioengineered organism intended as food to submit a premarket biotechnology notification to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). A &ldquo;bioengineered organism&rdquo; (commonly called a &ldquo;genetically modified organism&rdquo; or &ldquo;GMO&rdquo;) is a plant or part of a plant that has been modified through recombinant DNA techniques in a way that could not be obtained using conventional breeding techniques.
 
The premarket notification must include the developer&rsquo;s determination that food from, containing, or consisting of the GMO (GMO food) is as safe as a comparable non-GMO food. For the GMO to be sold as food, the FDA must not object to the developer&rsquo;s determination. If the FDA determines that there is a material difference between a GMO food and a comparable non-GMO food, the FDA can specify labeling that informs consumers of the difference.
 
A food label can only claim that a food is non-GMO if the ingredients are subject to certain supply chain process controls. No food label can suggest that non-GMO foods are safer than GMO foods. A food can be labeled as non-GMO even if it is produced with a GMO processing aid or enzyme or derived from animals fed GMO feed or given GMO drugs.
 
The FDA must allow, but not require, GMO food to be labeled as GMO.
 
The FDA must regulate the use of &ldquo;natural&rdquo; on food labels.
 
This bill amends the Agricultural Marketing Act of 1946 to require the Agricultural Marketing Service to establish a program to certify non-GMO food.
 This bill preempts state and local restrictions on GMOs or GMO food and labeling requirements for GMOs, GMO food, non-GMO food, or &ldquo;natural&rdquo; food.
action_date: 2015-07-16
text: 

Safe and Accurate Food Labeling Act of 2015

 
TITLE I--FOOD SAFETY AFFIRMATION FOR CERTAIN PLANT PRODUCTS
 
Subtitle A--Food and Drug Administration
 
(Sec. 101) This bill amends the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to require the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to continue the voluntary consultation process established under the FDA&rsquo;s &quot;Statement of Policy: Foods Derived from New Plant Varieties.&quot; In that process, the FDA evaluates a scientific and regulatory assessment provided by the developer of a food produced from, containing, or consisting of a plant that is a genetically engineered organism (GMO).
 
The FDA may require a GMO food to have a label that informs consumers of a material difference between the GMO food and a comparable food if the disclosure is necessary to protect public health and safety or to prevent the label from being false or misleading. The use of a GMO does not, by itself, constitute a material difference.
 
Subtitle B--Department of Agriculture
 
(Sec. 111) This bill amends the Plant Protection Act to allow the sale of a GMO food (including imported food and excluding plant pests) only if the FDA has determined through the consultation process that the GMO food is as safe as comparable foods and that determination has been shared with the Department of Agriculture (USDA). The FDA and USDA must report on implementation of this process. A GMO plant may be sold for research, to produce a processing aid or enzyme, or as a nutrient source for microorganisms without meeting these requirements.
 
USDA must publish a list of GMO plants that can be sold as food and the determinations made by the FDA and USDA regarding those foods.
 
(Sec. 113) State and local requirements for GMO food are preempted by this Act.
 
TITLE II--GENETIC ENGINEERING CERTIFICATION
 
(Sec. 201) This bill amends the Agricultural Marketing Act of 1946 to require the Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) to establish a voluntary genetically engineered food certification program. This program must be implemented through certifying agents accredited by the AMS.
 
For a food to be sold as a product produced without genetic engineering (non-GMO), the food must be subject to supply chain process controls that keep the product separated from GMOs and must be produced and handled in compliance with a non-genetically engineered food plan, which is a description of procedures to ensure compliance, monitoring records, and corrective actions in the event of a deviation from the plan.
 
For food derived from livestock to be sold as non-GMO, the product, livestock, feed, and products used in processing the feed must be produced without GMOs.
 
A food&rsquo;s label or advertising cannot suggest that non-GMO foods are safer or of higher quality than GMO foods.
 
For a food to be sold as a GMO food, it must be produced and handled in compliance with a genetically engineered food plan. A GMO food&rsquo;s label or advertising cannot suggest that it is safer or of higher quality solely because it is GMO.
 
The AMS must allow a person to voluntarily disclose how a product has been genetically engineered.
 
Imported products may be labeled as produced with or without genetic engineering if the products have been produced and handled under a genetic engineering certification program that provides safeguards and guidelines at least equivalent to the AMS&rsquo;s requirements.
 
(Sec. 203) State and local requirements for the labeling of GMO products are preempted unless the state or local government establishes a program that matches the programs described in this Act.
 
(Sec. 204) Claims made before enactment of this Act regarding whether a product was produced with or without genetic engineering may continue to be made for 36 months after enactment of this Act. After that period, the claims must meet the standards in this Act. Products from certified organic producers are deemed to be certified non-GMO.
 
TITLE III--NATURAL FOODS
 
(Sec. 302) The FDA must regulate the term &ldquo;natural&rdquo; on food labeling.
 (Sec. 303) State and local requirements for the term &ldquo;natural&rdquo; are preempted by FDA regulations.
action_date: 2015-07-23
text: 

Safe and Accurate Food Labeling Act of 2015

 
TITLE I--FOOD SAFETY AFFIRMATION FOR CERTAIN PLANT PRODUCTS
 
Subtitle A--Food and Drug Administration
 
(Sec. 101) This bill amends the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to require the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to continue the voluntary consultation process established under the FDA&rsquo;s &quot;Statement of Policy: Foods Derived from New Plant Varieties.&quot; In that process, the FDA evaluates a scientific and regulatory assessment provided by the developer of a food produced from, containing, or consisting of a plant that is a genetically engineered organism (GMO).
 
The FDA may require a GMO food to have a label that informs consumers of a material difference between the GMO food and a comparable food if the disclosure is necessary to protect public health and safety or to prevent the label from being false or misleading. The use of a GMO does not, by itself, constitute a material difference.
 
Subtitle B--Department of Agriculture
 
(Sec. 111) This bill amends the Plant Protection Act to allow the sale of a GMO food (including imported food and excluding plant pests) only if the FDA has determined through the consultation process that the GMO food is safe and lawful and that determination has been shared with the Department of Agriculture (USDA). The FDA and USDA must report on implementation of this process. A GMO plant may be sold for research, to produce a processing aid or enzyme, or as a nutrient source for microorganisms without meeting these requirements.
 
USDA must publish a list of GMO plants that can be sold as food and the determinations made by the FDA and USDA regarding those foods.
 
(Sec. 113) State and local requirements for GMO food are preempted by this Act.
 
TITLE II--GENETIC ENGINEERING CERTIFICATION
 
(Sec. 201) This bill amends the Agricultural Marketing Act of 1946 to require the Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) to establish a voluntary genetically engineered food certification program. This program must be implemented through certifying agents accredited by the AMS.
 
For a food to be sold as a product produced without genetic engineering (non-GMO), the food must be subject to supply chain process controls that keep the product separated from GMOs and must be produced and handled in compliance with a non-genetically engineered food plan, which is a description of procedures to ensure compliance, monitoring records, and corrective actions in the event of a deviation from the plan.
 
For food derived from livestock to be sold as non-GMO, the product, livestock, feed, and products used in processing the feed must be produced without GMOs.
 
A food&rsquo;s label or advertising cannot suggest that non-GMO foods are safer or of higher quality than GMO foods.
 
For a food to be sold as a GMO food, it must be produced and handled in compliance with a genetically engineered food plan. A GMO food&rsquo;s label or advertising cannot suggest that it is safer or of higher quality solely because it is GMO.
 
The AMS must allow a person to voluntarily disclose how a product has been genetically engineered.
 
Imported products may be labeled as produced with or without genetic engineering if the products have been produced and handled under a genetic engineering certification program that provides safeguards and guidelines at least equivalent to the AMS&rsquo;s requirements. 
 
(Sec. 203) State and local requirements for the labeling of GMO products are preempted unless the state or local government establishes a program that matches the programs described in this Act.
 
(Sec. 204) Claims made before enactment of this Act regarding whether a product was produced with or without genetic engineering may continue to be made for 36 months after enactment of this Act. After that period, the claims must meet the standards in this Act. Products from certified organic producers are deemed to be certified non-GMO.
 
TITLE III--NATURAL FOODS
 
(Sec. 302) The FDA must regulate the term &ldquo;natural&rdquo; on food labeling.
 (Sec. 303) State and local requirements for the term &ldquo;natural&rdquo; are preempted by FDA regulations.

Legislative actions:
action_date: 2015-07-24
text: Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
action_date: 2015-07-23
text: Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
action_date: 2015-07-23
text: Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
action_date: 2015-07-23
text: On passage Passed by recorded vote: 275 - 150 (Roll no. 462).
action_date: 2015-07-23
text: Passed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed by recorded vote: 275 - 150 (Roll no. 462).
action_date: 2015-07-23
text: The House adopted the amendment in the nature of a substitute as agreed to by the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union. (text of measure in the nature of a substitute: CR H5426-5430)
action_date: 2015-07-23
text: The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule. (consideration: CR H5438)
action_date: 2015-07-23
text: The House rose from the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union to report H.R. 1599.
action_date: 2015-07-23
text: UNFINISHED BUSINESS - The Chair announced that the unfinished business was on adoption of amendments, which had been debated earlier and on which further proceedings had been postponed.
action_date: 2015-07-23
text: DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 369, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Pingree amendment No. 4.
action_date: 2015-07-23
text: POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the DeLauro amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Ms. DeLauro demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until a time to be announced.
action_date: 2015-07-23
text: DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 369, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the DeLauro amendment No. 3.
action_date: 2015-07-23
text: POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Huffman amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Huffman demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until a time to be announced.
action_date: 2015-07-23
text: DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 369, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Huffman amendment No. 2.
action_date: 2015-07-23
text: POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the DeFazio amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. DeFazio demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until a time to be announced.
action_date: 2015-07-23
text: DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H.Res. 369, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the DeFazio amendment No. 1.
action_date: 2015-07-23
text: GENERAL DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with one hour of general debate on H.R. 1599.
action_date: 2015-07-23
text: The Speaker designated the Honorable Michael K. Simpson to act as Chairman of the Committee.
action_date: 2015-07-23
text: House resolved itself into the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union pursuant to H. Res. 369 and Rule XVIII.
action_date: 2015-07-23
text: Resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 1599 and H.R. 1734.
action_date: 2015-07-23
text: Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 369. (consideration: CR H5416-5439)
action_date: 2015-07-21
text: Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 369 Reported to House. Resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 1599 and H.R. 1734.
action_date: 2015-07-21
text: Supplemental report filed by the Committee on Agriculture, H. Rept. 114-208, Part II.
action_date: 2015-07-21
text: Supplemental report filed by the Committee on Agriculture, H. Rept. 114-208, Part II.
action_date: 2015-07-21
text: Mr. Conaway asked unanimous consent that the Committee on Agriculture be authorized to file a supplemental report on H.R. 1599. Agreed to without objection.
action_date: 2015-07-16
text: Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Agriculture. H. Rept. 114-208, Part I.
action_date: 2015-07-16
text: Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Agriculture. H. Rept. 114-208, Part I.
action_date: 2015-07-14
text: Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by Voice Vote.
action_date: 2015-07-14
text: Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.
action_date: 2015-04-08
text: Referred to the Subcommittee on Biotechnology, Horticulture, and Research.
action_date: 2015-03-27
text: Referred to the Subcommittee on Health.
action_date: 2015-03-25
text: Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Agriculture, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
action_date: 2015-03-25
text: Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Agriculture, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
action_date: 2015-03-25
text: Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Agriculture, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
action_date: 2015-03-25
text: Introduced in House
action_date: 2015-03-25
text: Introduced in House