Rail Shipper Fairness Act of 2015

Bill: 114-s-853
Sponsor: Sen. Baldwin, Tammy [D-WI]
Introduced: 2015-03-24 in the Senate
Policy area: Transportation and Public Works
Subjects: Administrative remedies
Executive agency funding and structure
Public participation and lobbying
Railroads
Surface Transportation Board
Transportation costs

Summary:
action_date: 2015-03-24
text: 

Rail Shipper Fairness Act of 2015

 
The Surface Transportation Board (STB) may:
 
 
issue emergency service orders covering rail carrier shipments moving under contract only if they are part of a regional service order; and
 
require reports, service plans, or other documents that cover shipments moving under contract if such shipments are part of a general report, service plan, or other document that generally covers the geographic area or commodity.
 
 
Rail carriers shall be liable to any person in federal district court for damages or equitable relief as a result of inadequate or deficient service in violation of federal law.
 
Civil monetary penalties for rail carriers increase from $5,000 to $25,000 per violation.
 
It is U.S. transportation policy to provide for and promote the protection of the shipping public.
 
 Shippers may obtain rates to or from any interchange points of two or more rail carriers.
 
When determining whether a rail carrier proposing a rate challenged as unreasonably high has market dominance over the transportation to which the rate applies, the STB shall consider that the rail carrier could have market dominance even in circumstances in which a shipper is served by two carriers.
 
The circumstances involving mandatory reciprocal switching agreements are changed. The STB shall now require a Class 1 rail carrier to enter into a competitive switching agreement if a shipper or receiver (or a group of shippers or receivers) files a petition that satisfies the Board that:
 
 
the facilities of the shipper or receiver are served by rail only by a single, Class I rail carrier; and
 
there is or can be a working interchange between the Class I rail carrier serving the shipper or receiver in question and another rail carrier within a reasonable distance of the facilities of such shipper or receiver.
 
 
Competitive switching may not be imposed, however, if:
 
 
either rail carrier between which such switching is to be established demonstrates that the proposed switching is not feasible or is unsafe, or
 
the presence of reciprocal switching will unduly restrict the ability of a rail carrier to serve its own shippers.
 
 
The STB must observe specified rules when deciding stand-alone cost cases with respect to a maximum reasonable rate.
 
The STB shall apply a certain formula to calculate a rail carrier's cost of capital. This replaces the current requirement that the STB determine annually which rail carriers are earning adequate revenues.
 
The number of STB members increases from 3 to 5, with no more than 3 of them (currently no more than 2 of them) from the same party. At least 2 members must have a background in shipping or consumer advocacy.
 
The STB must meet regularly.


Legislative actions:
action_date: 2015-03-24
text: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
action_date: 2015-03-24
text: Introduced in Senate