Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 4089) to protect and enhance opportunities for recreational hunting, fishing and shooting, and for other purposes.

Bill: 112-hres-614
Sponsor: Rep. Bishop, Rob [R-UT-1]
Introduced: 2012-04-16 in the House
Policy area: Congress
Subjects: House of Representatives
Legislative rules and procedure

Summary:
action_date: 2012-04-16
text: Sets forth the rule for consideration of the bill (H.R. 4089) to protect and enhance opportunities for recreational hunting, fishing and shooting.

Legislative actions:
action_date: 2012-04-17
text: Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
action_date: 2012-04-17
text: On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by recorded vote: 228 - 184 (Roll no. 156). (text: CR H1860)
action_date: 2012-04-17
text: Passed/agreed to in House: On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by recorded vote: 228 - 184 (Roll no. 156).(text: CR H1860)
action_date: 2012-04-17
text: On ordering the previous question Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 235 - 179 (Roll no. 155). (consideration: CR H1871)
action_date: 2012-04-17
text: DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H. Res. 614.
action_date: 2012-04-17
text: On question of consideration of the Resolution Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 234 - 175 (Roll no. 154). (consideration: CR H1862)
action_date: 2012-04-17
text: Considered as privileged matter. (consideration: CR H1860-1872)
action_date: 2012-04-17
text: POINT OF ORDER AGAINST CONSIDERATION - Ms. Moore stated that the provisions of H.Res. 614 violates section 426(a) of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 and made a point of order against the consideration of the resolution. Subsequently, the Chair noted that the required threshold of identifying the specific language in question had been met, and the House proceeded with 20 minutes of debate on the question of consideration. At the conclusion of debate on the question of consideration, the Chair will put the question to wit: Will the House now consider the resolution?
action_date: 2012-04-17
text: By direction of the Committee on Rules, Mr. Bishop (UT) called up the resolution H.Res. 614, and asked for its immediate consideration.
action_date: 2012-04-16
text: Placed on the House Calendar, Calendar No. 124.
action_date: 2012-04-16
text: In lieu of the amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended by the Committee on Natural Resources now printed in the bill, it shall be in order to consider as an original bill for the purpose of amendment under the five-minute rule an amendment in the nature of a substitute consisting of the text of Rules Committee Print 112-19. Pending the adoption of a concurrent resolution on the budget for fiscal year 2013, the provisions of House Concurrent Resolution 112, as adopted by the House, shall have force and effect in the House as though Congress has adopted such concurrent resolution with modifications specified in this resolution.
action_date: 2012-04-16
text: The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 112-444, by Mr. Bishop (UT).
action_date: 2012-04-16
text: The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 112-444, by Mr. Bishop (UT).
action_date: 2012-04-16
text: Introduced in House