Thermal Imagers - Page 1
Forum section: electronics / projects

author: olsenn
author_rank: Frequent Contributor
timestamp: March 27, 2012, 06:54:23 pm
content: Does anybody know of any DIY tutorials for making a thermal imager? I'm not sure if the neccessary components can even be purchased online (apart from purchasing a premade imager), but I'd like to learn more about how they work, and possibly make one if I can.

author: PeterG
author_rank: Frequent Contributor
timestamp: March 27, 2012, 11:47:45 pm
content: the most expensive component of a thermal imager is the thermal sensor itself and the optics. Building one yourself would probable cost more than purchasing one online.It would make am interesting project tho.Regards

author: Psi
author_rank: Super Contributor
timestamp: March 28, 2012, 12:27:02 am
content: You could buy one of those ~$50 non-contact digital infrared thermometers (the kind you point at an object and it reports temperature)Then take it apart and somehow mount the sensor and optics on a scanning motor so you can build an image of a 2D area by reading values and position.I have no idea if it would work but it wouldn't be too expensive to find out.

author: Rerouter
author_rank: Super Contributor
timestamp: March 28, 2012, 01:22:07 am
content: from memory the simplest way to approach it is to remove the IR filtering lense from a webcam or camera and used a special type of exposed camera film to instead filter out all visible light,last place i read up on them was how to make a touchscreen, however i suppose you might also be able to rip the sensor out of a wii remote, they have a somewhat amazing IR sensor in them, that tracks 4 points with its current circuitry, (4 brightest points)

author: sacherjj
author_rank: Frequent Contributor
timestamp: March 28, 2012, 04:14:05 am
content: Quote from: Psi on March 28, 2012, 12:27:02 amThat is an interesting idea. I wonder what type of update rate one of those sensors could handle. It would be like HAM Radio Slow Scan TV.

author: tesla500
author_rank: Regular Contributor
timestamp: March 28, 2012, 07:05:05 am
content: Quote from: Rerouter on March 28, 2012, 01:22:07 amUnfortunately that won't result in a thermal image camera. Normal (visible light) image sensors can sense up to perhaps 1um wavelength with the IR filters removed. A true thermal image camera works at much longer wavelengths, on the order of 10um. "Low cost" thermal cameras use a microbolometer, which is basically an array of microscopic thermistors suspended above an ASIC containing readout circuitry, all mounted in a vacuum chamber. The heating due to incident IR light is measured by the thermistors and read out by an ADC.Higher end cameras use something more along the lines of a conventional CCD or CMOS sensor, but using different materials. The sensor also has to be cooled well below ambient, to perhaps -100C, to avoid being blinded by it's own thermal radiation (imagine designing a camera where the image sensor and all the casing, lenses, etc were glowing white hot).I was thinking about a practical way to make a thermal imager, the only thing I can think of is to make a "minibolometer" using an array of the smallest SMT thermistors available. Resolution would be low, and the response time would be very slow, likely many seconds, but it may just be possible.Quote from: sacherjj on March 28, 2012, 04:14:05 amThis has actually been done before:http://www.cheap-thermocam.tk/

author: wkb
author_rank: Super Contributor
timestamp: March 28, 2012, 07:34:11 am
content: Quote from: Rerouter on March 28, 2012, 01:22:07 amDigital camera sensors are covered by a low-pass filter which blocks 'all' IR light. It is not the lens that does the filtering. All that said, thermography uses much langer wavelengths than plain digital camera sensors can 'see'.The latter are typically filtered with high-pass filters in the 800nm range. I once tried a 950nm but that already gives you a very much reduced sensitivity.Seehttp://wkb.home.xs4all.nl/IR-DC3400/for an inside look.