Motionless Energy Generator, Sky New Australia 2008 - Page 1
Forum section: electronics / general

author: SgtRock
author_rank: Unknown
timestamp: August 30, 2011, 05:50:54 am
content: Greeting EEVBees:--I was just wondering if anyone had heard anything more on this scam, since this article from 2008. Sky News joins the American networks in the hall of credibility."Three weeks in the lab will save you a day in the library every time" Stanley Williams, HP LabsBest RegardsClear Ether

author: Zad
author_rank: Super Contributor
timestamp: August 30, 2011, 03:41:20 pm
content: Sky News was set up and is still part-owned by Rupert Murdoch. Who also owns Fox News. This probably tells you everything you need to know. Add to this the fact that most journalists are Arts graduates without a scientific bone in their body, and you can see why the "story" dominates objective factual content every time.YouTube is full of zero-point "free" energy devices made by inventors in their garden sheds. Isn't it strange how not a single one of them has made it to market? (That question is rhetorical, before any conspiracists jump in)

author: AntiProtonBoy
author_rank: Frequent Contributor
timestamp: August 30, 2011, 03:48:59 pm
content: Yeah, I remember seeing that on TV. I smelled BS then, and it's still BS now. If anyone can pass that through a peer reviewed journal in flying colours, then we'd be looking at the next Nobel candidates in physics, right there. But of course, their shit never makes it outside their garden sheds.

author: Simon
author_rank: Unknown
timestamp: August 30, 2011, 05:16:06 pm
content: to be honest these people should face criminal charges, even if they have not sold anyone anything, and news organisations should be obliged to retract stories and publicly write them off as scams. The rest of the so called educated world, should go and get an education !

author: vk6zgo
author_rank: Super Contributor
timestamp: August 31, 2011, 08:10:21 am
content: The "experts" the TV journalists use are more expert in self-promotion than anything else,& as the journos themselves are laypersons,they don't know any better.I remember one show where they were trying to show that TV service companies were ripping off customers.The"expert"(1) reprogrammed one TV incorrectly to simulate a fault,&(2)sabotaged a connector.The TV techs spent a bit of time,& charged quite reasonably,considering the "faults"introduced were obscure.(1)Normally TV sets don't suddenly become incorrectly programmed,so it was reasonable to expend some time in search of a reason for this behaviour.After all,if they just reprogrammed it,& it failed again,with a real customer it would "bounce".(2)The same applies in this case----You don't normally look for sabotage!Had he changed a component for a faulty one,it would have been a fair test.This bloke "got my goat",anyway,as he was so pleased with himself!The silly thing is TV networks have a large number of technically competent people working for them,but don't think to ask them!VK6ZGO

author: Kozmyk
author_rank: Regular Contributor
timestamp: August 31, 2011, 12:23:48 pm
content: Combine one of these with an HHO fuel saver and they won't be able GIVE petrol away

author: SgtRock
author_rank: Unknown
timestamp: August 31, 2011, 03:03:36 pm
content: To Kozmyk:--True, true. But the real money is in persuading governments to buy billions of dollars worth of working but marginally cost effective technology like wind and photovoltaic installations, using fuzzy math and overly optimistic projections. Of course asserting that CO2 can be reduced enough to have a perceptible effect on climate, helps excuse taxing power users into the poor house. This sort of thing is hard to defeat, for if it fails, it can only be because not enough taxpayer money was not spent on it. Best RegardsClear Ether