Solar roadways are a step closer to reality!!  - Page 1
Forum section: electronics / general

author: wilfred
author_rank: Super Contributor
timestamp: July 28, 2014, 08:51:36 am
content: /.

author: AlfBaz
author_rank: Super Contributor
timestamp: July 28, 2014, 10:18:20 am
content: Quote from: wilfred on July 28, 2014, 08:51:36 amDamn! Where will I plug my anti static matt

author: Wilksey
author_rank: Super Contributor
timestamp: July 28, 2014, 10:31:49 am
content: Someone's going to get a big electricity bill if we have to rely on "plugging" into the ground!I can really see the governments going for free energy on the roads when they could charge for such privilege, not to mention the"ease" of storing all of this solar energy.

author: Jon86
author_rank: Frequent Contributor
timestamp: July 28, 2014, 10:37:04 am
content: How feasible are the actual principles behind this then? I mean, assuming infinite resources and money, would this work on a small scale at least? I understand wireless power distribution as we know it today, but would this work at all?

author: John_L
author_rank: Contributor
timestamp: July 28, 2014, 12:10:52 pm
content: Recent Seminar on the subject with English Subtitles, nearly 2 hours.

author: Jon86
author_rank: Frequent Contributor
timestamp: July 28, 2014, 12:52:28 pm
content: Yeah I really am quite surprised that all these crowd funding sites don't care that they're being used to scam millions out of people, surely they must be somewhat responsible for stopping it?

author: mij59
author_rank: Frequent Contributor
timestamp: July 28, 2014, 01:02:22 pm
content: Never endingWhat's next photo voltaic asphalt ?

author: wraper
author_rank: Unknown
timestamp: July 28, 2014, 01:05:34 pm
content: Mentioning poor Tesla right away is a red flag that this is total bullshit. IMO it is matter of honor for those free/bullshit energy scammers to not give him a rest in the afterworld.

author: puppycock
author_rank: Newbie
timestamp: July 28, 2014, 05:36:12 pm
content: Quote from: Jon86 on July 28, 2014, 12:52:28 pmWell they make about 10% profit from all the raised funds, the better the scam the more money they get.

author: mikerj
author_rank: Super Contributor
timestamp: July 28, 2014, 07:57:50 pm
content: What is it?It's a TESLA FREAKIN' COIL!What does it do?Electrical distribution costs from your SOLAR FREAKIN' ROADWAY making you FREAKIN' depressed? You need a TESLA FREAKIN' COIL!

author: Stonent
author_rank: Super Contributor
timestamp: July 29, 2014, 05:07:46 am
content: Will wireless power transmission technologies pass EMI regulations?

author: Berni
author_rank: Super Contributor
timestamp: July 29, 2014, 12:30:42 pm
content: Quote from: Stonent on July 29, 2014, 05:07:46 amHow can they say they for sure failed the EMI test when none of there 100 grand test equipment works anymore as soon as the test starts haha

author: Rasz
author_rank: Super Contributor
timestamp: July 29, 2014, 05:00:05 pm
content: Quote from: Jon86 on July 28, 2014, 12:52:28 pmread it quickly as 'clown funding sites' and it felt so right

author: Neilm
author_rank: Super Contributor
timestamp: July 29, 2014, 06:47:15 pm
content: Quote from: Stonent on July 29, 2014, 05:07:46 amThey will just do what they did for Ethernet over power - either ignore it or say that it can make as much noise as it wants

author: snoopy
author_rank: Frequent Contributor
timestamp: July 31, 2014, 10:52:29 am
content: Like P.T Barnam said "There is a sucker born every minute"

author: PChi
author_rank: Frequent Contributor
timestamp: August 31, 2014, 06:46:22 pm
content: Today's (31st August) Sunday Telegraph Business Reporter section had an article on this with pictures so it appears to be still running. I didn't bother to read it but such coverage gives the 'project' some credibility unfortunately.

author: G7PSK
author_rank: Super Contributor
timestamp: September 04, 2014, 05:25:40 pm
content: I did not know that Tesla departed by satellite, but according to how their blurb reads that is what he did.

author: miguelvp
author_rank: Super Contributor
timestamp: September 04, 2014, 05:55:22 pm
content: Quote from: G7PSK on September 04, 2014, 05:25:40 pmYou are reading it wrong and out of context, not sure why they felt they had to add the whole inventor departure emphasis in that phrase but because on how ambiguous English can be it can be miss interpreted