SOLD FS [US east]: Keithley DMM6500 - Page 1
Forum section: electronics / general

author: Xtremexp
author_rank: Regular Contributor
timestamp: July 18, 2022, 07:28:32 pm
content: I am interested, sent DM

author: arcitech
author_rank: Regular Contributor
timestamp: July 20, 2022, 01:02:38 am
content: Bumping since:- price has come down a smidge (thought it'd be claimed by now!), and- I failed to mention the USB cable. It will of course also come w/ the USB cable. (that's in the photo of the paperwork)

author: coromonadalix
author_rank: Super Contributor
timestamp: July 25, 2022, 07:11:35 pm
content: your images links seems dead?

author: arcitech
author_rank: Regular Contributor
timestamp: July 26, 2022, 10:05:02 pm
content: Quote from: coromonadalix on July 25, 2022, 07:11:35 pmSorry, yes, as it's been sold. I thought I removed the post before but it seems I did not.

author: pizzigri
author_rank: Regular Contributor
timestamp: July 27, 2022, 12:04:03 pm
content: Hi,Sort of wish you did not remove the post. It is great to have a reference for future sales/purchases, and also for pictures etc.even if I presently am not interested in a 6500 you never know.

author: Brumby
author_rank: Unknown
timestamp: July 27, 2022, 01:48:18 pm
content: Quote from: pizzigri on July 27, 2022, 12:04:03 pmIndeed. There is no need to remove any details - just change the heading of the original post (as you have) and leave the rest intact. The fact that the unit is no longer available is quite clear and many people would find this information interesting and/or useful.

author: HighVoltage
author_rank: Super Contributor
timestamp: July 27, 2022, 02:31:06 pm
content: That is why it is always a good idea for the first reply to quote the first post.

author: Momchilo
author_rank: Regular Contributor
timestamp: July 27, 2022, 05:41:23 pm
content: Quote from: pizzigri on July 27, 2022, 12:04:03 pmThis was a more or less new unit sold for $950$.

author: arcitech
author_rank: Regular Contributor
timestamp: July 28, 2022, 01:20:18 am
content: Apologies if I've broken some kind of norms or mores. It was my first time selling. That said, with respect to images and other kinds of media that involve my home or workplace, and may or may not include sensitive info I'm unaware of (such as exif geo data), I'll always opt for retaining control over that media and the means of access to it, unless prohibited. I'm not aware of such a prohibition.But yes, this was a basically new condition (but 3.x yrs old) 6500 that was offered for $950. It did not sell for $950 though, and did not sell via the forum. Had it, the copy likely would've been left alone but the images in a public album would certainly have been [edit: would've been removed at the external source, that is]. If I'm publishing imagery that persists in its original state then I'd personally just be more careful about exactly what's in shot etc.So, reasons, involving feels, both my own and limiting them for others involved. I'm not trying to be shady.

author: arcitech
author_rank: Regular Contributor
timestamp: July 28, 2022, 01:34:58 am
content: Quote from: Brumby on July 27, 2022, 01:48:18 pmThe edge- and corner-cases of finding essentially transactional information interesting and/or useful is what I'm worried about. And since the unauthenticated web is infinitely accessible by a finite number of humans and infinite scrapers/aggregators/lesser-known bots, these cases are not typical edges or corners.Again, glad to abide by the rules, and also to respect others' opinions, but I also hope it's clear my motives aren't without merit and sound judgement, even to those whose hats aren't lined with shielding screen. [edit for fat-finger]