smartphone EMI blocking sticker - Page 1
Forum section: electronics / general

author: NiHaoMike
author_rank: Super Contributor
timestamp: February 16, 2020, 08:10:29 pm
content: https://greensmoothiegirl.com/erinelizabeth/Quote

author: Cyberdragon
author_rank: Super Contributor
timestamp: February 17, 2020, 08:30:33 am
content: Wow, they ran a test proving low-power non-ionizing RF has no affect on DNA in the first place.But oh no, those test totes like proves our shit legit yo, it blocks 84% (number pulled out their ass) of harmful effects but not your reception!Why 84%? Why not make up 99%? I've never seen a scam derate itself.

author: Ultrapurple
author_rank: Super Contributor
timestamp: February 19, 2020, 12:27:24 pm
content: Quote from: Cyberdragon on February 17, 2020, 08:30:33 amMaybe that's to make you think it mightnotbe a scam...?

author: SiliconWizard
author_rank: Super Contributor
timestamp: February 19, 2020, 02:56:16 pm
content: Quote from: Ultrapurple on February 19, 2020, 12:27:24 pmYup of course. 84% looks more "reasonable", and choosing a non-"round" figure (like 85% instead) makes it appear more "genuine".

author: Haenk
author_rank: Super Contributor
timestamp: February 19, 2020, 06:55:06 pm
content: I'd say it's close to 104,2% being legit. Yes, I did prove that scientifically with a bottle full of activated and properly stirred cold water.But wait, there is more:http://www.emfandhealth.com/EHS%20Scams.html

author: MrMobodies
author_rank: Super Contributor
timestamp: February 25, 2020, 01:21:36 pm
content: On that link I have never known this one before:https://greensmoothiegirl.com/erinelizabeth/QuoteImagine putting one in a bra, wouldn't the shape be visible to everyone else and wouldn't that cause pain and discomfort?

author: rrinker
author_rank: Super Contributor
timestamp: February 25, 2020, 04:34:13 pm
content: Depends on how well endowed the woman is. Some women can hide full laptops in there, let alone a cell phone.

author: Mr. Scram
author_rank: Super Contributor
timestamp: February 25, 2020, 04:38:18 pm
content: They have phones where the entire device radiates instead of just the antenna?

author: AVGresponding
author_rank: Super Contributor
timestamp: February 25, 2020, 05:57:41 pm
content: https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/cellular-disruption/TLDR; There's no hard evidence for it, but it doesn't hurt to err on the side of caution.I for one do not keep my phone in my underpants.

author: PlainName
author_rank: Super Contributor
timestamp: February 25, 2020, 09:00:02 pm
content: QuoteClever! You can't argue with their claims (well, you could, but you'd be wrong):QuoteNo doubt, but there is no claim there that the cells without the patch weren't part of the 100% protected.QuoteYep, induce the fear of radiation in them, tell 'em this will cure it, and that's the stress gone. They don't claim it's preventing radiation damage.QuoteAlso no doubt true. They are not claiming it blocks the radiation, merely the negative effects (which would be the fear of the radiation). Clearly, even picking and choosing, 26% of their sample weren't the suckers they thought they'd be

author: MrMobodies
author_rank: Super Contributor
timestamp: February 25, 2020, 09:25:43 pm
content: Quote from: rrinker on February 25, 2020, 04:34:13 pmI think I understand, those that do for whatever reason try to grow the boobs or have them surgically enlarged so that they can put put stuff in between.

author: El Rubio
author_rank: Regular Contributor
timestamp: March 22, 2020, 04:18:22 pm
content: I’m an engineer in the wireless industry. We use rf shielding/ absorbing materials to mitigate harmful IMD interference. For example, on a rooftop with antennas, there are lots of rusty bolts, dissimilar metals, etc. We isolate the sources then cover them initially with an “RF Blanket”. These blankets are expensive. I’m thinking that I could get several of these stickers and use them instead. I could save the company a fortune. Wouldn’t that be funny, a wireless carrier becomes their best customer. Imagine the conspiracy theories- LOL.

author: MrMobodies
author_rank: Super Contributor
timestamp: April 12, 2020, 08:32:09 pm
content: Edit:I'm sorry I have just realized that I have gotten confused with a different EMF phone sticker.https://www.doctorvalproducts.com/products/cell-phone-radiation-neutralizers-family-pack-of-10They have affiliates "As seen on".NBC, CBS, FOX, ABCI did a search and reveled very little or maybe I didn't look well enough."valerie nelson""Dr valerie nelson""doctorvalproducts.com"Just one link to ABC 7 from last year but the article seems to be gone.QuoteI see one article on some marketing media journal about Thyroid and EMF from phones:https://marketersmedia.com/dr-valerie-nelson-of-abundant-life-wellness-announces-the-addition-of-latest-product-line-for-thyroid-patients/223420I have just emailed their affiliates to find out if they are in any way connected and allowed to use their logos for their marketing.

author: MrMobodies
author_rank: Super Contributor
timestamp: April 12, 2020, 09:34:38 pm
content: Sorry to double post but I have also noticed something else that is long in post.See their picture:Healthy live children because of their sticker all over their stuff but the stickers don't look to me at the correct angle.Image lookup by removing the stickers and bottom bit:A BIG FAKE.So they used a standard picture found everywhere else to put their stickers on.Some appear to be delusional but When they do things like this I tend to think they know it is a scam.