Poll for processing device for community bench meter. - Page 1
Forum section: electronics / projects

author: Unknown
author_rank: Unknown
timestamp: February 04, 2010, 08:52:35 am
content: OK Self explanatory, if you vote "Other" put the idea into a post

author: charliex
author_rank: Frequent Contributor
timestamp: February 04, 2010, 05:17:54 pm
content: other: cypress PSOC

author: septer012
author_rank: Regular Contributor
timestamp: February 05, 2010, 09:36:39 am
content: where are the PIC fans at!!!?

author: Unknown
author_rank: Unknown
timestamp: February 05, 2010, 09:39:06 am
content: Quote from: septer012 on February 05, 2010, 09:36:39 amROFLMAO they have all seen the lightAtmel is not stuffing around our ISP, and the JTAGICE II does ONE WIRE DEBUG on compatible chips (uses the reset line to debug firmwareor can do everything on Jtag parts (including hosing fuses

author: Ferroto
author_rank: Frequent Contributor
timestamp: February 06, 2010, 02:05:04 am
content: Quote from: septer012 on February 05, 2010, 09:36:39 amWe are Atmel your technological distinctiveness will be added to your own... RESISTANCE IS FUTILE

author: Unknown
author_rank: Unknown
timestamp: February 06, 2010, 04:50:12 am
content: Quote from: Ferroto on February 06, 2010, 02:05:04 amIf R <1 !

author: MightyTwin
author_rank: Contributor
timestamp: February 06, 2010, 12:02:18 pm
content: Ontopic:An AVR with an Aduino bootloader is a sure way to get attention to the project, indeed.-Twin.

author: Unknown
author_rank: Unknown
timestamp: February 06, 2010, 02:20:39 pm
content: ROFLMAO I love that pictureI agree with using Aduino to make the project more popular with hackers.

author: septer012
author_rank: Regular Contributor
timestamp: February 07, 2010, 07:18:44 am
content: ArduinoI have completely lost interest.

author: _Sync_
author_rank: Contributor
timestamp: February 07, 2010, 11:39:44 am
content: Yep, I'd prefer to not use the bloat of Arduino. AVRs are fine, but the Adruino sofware and thier libs are incredibly bulky.

author: armandas
author_rank: Frequent Contributor
timestamp: February 07, 2010, 11:46:38 am
content: Quote from: septer012 on February 07, 2010, 07:18:44 amI have nothing against having a bootloader on the micro, but I hope that the community will use C for core implementation. If not, I can make my own firmware

author: Unknown
author_rank: Unknown
timestamp: February 07, 2010, 03:13:15 pm
content: I think the whole point is to make it open source, we can do a basic Audrino version for the hackers and have just a pure C version for the Pros (I doubt many pros would use Audrino)I am not talking using Audrino PCB's, I am talking Audrino Bootloader and Firmware (so if you want to do it in C, ASM, Basic.... Just plug in ISP or Jtag and play to your heart is content)Regards,Kat.

author: Simon
author_rank: Unknown
timestamp: February 08, 2010, 07:56:40 am
content: I'm not really qualified to answer this as I only know a little about pics from the perspective of Basic programing

author: Unknown
author_rank: Unknown
timestamp: February 08, 2010, 02:00:23 pm
content: Obviously anyone can reprogram the micro anyway they want, but there will be a reference implementation which 95% of the users will use. A hardware design with five half-assed software variants wouldn't be very useful or fun (except for those five people). The language choice for most architectures is C, and for (some) AVR's there's also the C-like language from Arduino (processing?). Or we could do it all in assembly to annoy Dave and make life miserable for anyone trying to port it to another micro.