Self-Diagnostic for second hand Fluke 289 - Page 1
Forum section: electronics / testgear

author: monikersupreme
author_rank: Newbie
timestamp: November 28, 2021, 10:44:00 pm
content: Greetings & Salutations!!!I purchased a Fluke 289 second hand a couple weeks ago and am expecting delivery of it in the next few days - the meter is way overkill for my needs but I got a pretty good deal on it (equivalent for what I would have paid for a new 87V at least) so even though it's pricey I decided to take the plunge.Assuming I can boot up the 289 is there any kind of on-board self-diagnostic functionality I can use to determine if there are any problems (while I'm still technically in my return period)?The 289 was listed as "recently purchased" and NIB...Once I have the 289 in hand which physical components should I scrutinize (battery, board, leads, etc) - is there anything in particular I should look for to determine if I am dealing with a damaged or defective meter?Assuming the device is functional I should be able to get output as to the build date and firmware but people also seem to be able to discern this from the S/N on the back of the case..Is there any online reference for [S/N -> manufacture date] that I can use to look up my device number once I have it in hand?Any advice would be much appreciated!!!

author: bdunham7
author_rank: Super Contributor
timestamp: November 29, 2021, 02:29:58 am
content: Go to Fluke and register as its owner. If it hasn't been registered before, you should end up with the 'lifetime' 10 year warranty. Although they technically could require proof of purchase from an authorized dealer, they typically don't.When you get it, turn it on and go to SETUP -- METER INFO. You should get the serial #, the last calibration date and the calibration counter. If the calibration counter is 1, then the calibration date will be the approximate date of manufacture.

author: AVGresponding
author_rank: Super Contributor
timestamp: November 29, 2021, 05:52:27 pm
content: And whatever you do, don't use primary cells!Mine runs happily on either Ni-Zn or Ni-MH, so there's no reason to risk the release of schmoo!

author: monikersupreme
author_rank: Newbie
timestamp: November 30, 2021, 10:25:20 pm
content: Thanks for your response!!Here is what I'm seeing:Firmware Version: 1.16 / V0.88Calibration Date: 09/06.17Calibration Counter: 1From the Fluke website it seems that 1.16 is for the "older" hardware and 1.41 is the newest revision of the firmware, however, I can't seem to find out what the functional difference might be between the two.Is there any advantage to having a newer 289 with the v1.41 firmware?

author: bdunham7
author_rank: Super Contributor
timestamp: November 30, 2021, 10:32:49 pm
content: I don't know of any advantage of the 1.41 firmware per se, but the newer meters that run it are also the ones that have had the supercaps superceded with something else (a lithium cell?) so that they don't get the leaky supercap disease. 1.16 is the latest for the old hardware. If you can leave your batteries out overnight without losing the clock, then your supercap is still good. Your meter is still fairly new, so I wouldn't worry a lot. If you can, register it wiht Fluke and then just put it to work.

author: BeBuLamar
author_rank: Super Contributor
timestamp: December 01, 2021, 02:27:18 am
content: My 289 is version 1.16. Calibration date March 2017. I had it since new so it's never got recalibration. I removed the battery for about a week and the date and time is still correct.

author: monikersupreme
author_rank: Newbie
timestamp: December 01, 2021, 04:03:25 am
content: Quote from: bdunham7 on November 30, 2021, 10:32:49 pmI'll give that a shot. Thanks much.Outside of the battery drain / memory loss is there any other symptom of supercap leak that I should look for - and if the supercap issue does show up do you think it's better to warranty the device or try to get a refund (purchased this for about $440 USD)?

author: monikersupreme
author_rank: Newbie
timestamp: December 01, 2021, 04:39:14 am
content: Quote from: AVGresponding on November 29, 2021, 05:52:27 pmIt came with a full flight of Energizer AAs installed - is it worth swapping these out then?Any specific brand recommendations - or any I should avoid?

author: bdunham7
author_rank: Super Contributor
timestamp: December 01, 2021, 05:16:00 am
content: Those are likely the batteries that the meter came with! How much life does the battery indicator show? I'd use them up and then get Eneloops.

author: monikersupreme
author_rank: Newbie
timestamp: December 01, 2021, 05:24:22 am
content: Quote from: bdunham7 on December 01, 2021, 05:16:00 amFull I believe (although they are out now as per your earlier advice) - I'll look into Eneloops.If the supercap issue presents on the new device do you think I should warranty the 289 or return it?

author: bdunham7
author_rank: Super Contributor
timestamp: December 01, 2021, 05:53:29 am
content: If the original batteries are in it and still good, the supercap is most likely good (high battery drain is one of the two symptoms). That and the relative newness of it would make me guess that it is fine. If you got a very good deal on it, then you don't want to return it even if Fluke wouldn't warranty it--the supercap replacement is no big deal.

author: monikersupreme
author_rank: Newbie
timestamp: December 01, 2021, 07:35:23 am
content: Quote from: bdunham7 on December 01, 2021, 05:53:29 amYeah I'm guessing it's good. With taxes and shipping my total was $440 which seems like a decent enough deal for a "new" 289 (based on what I've seen online). Once I verify that the memory I'l go register it and, assuming I don't have any problems there, I should be good to go.Thanks again for all your advice!!!

author: BeBuLamar
author_rank: Super Contributor
timestamp: December 01, 2021, 05:41:51 pm
content: Quote from: bdunham7 on December 01, 2021, 05:53:29 amI think Fluke would warranty it because I have sent back 87V, 189 and 289 and all they asked for was the serial number. They didn't ask for receipt or anything like that.

author: AVGresponding
author_rank: Super Contributor
timestamp: December 01, 2021, 08:50:44 pm
content: Quote from: monikersupreme on December 01, 2021, 04:39:14 amDefinitely. Dave seems to think the reason for all modern alkalines to leak is that they no longer use mercury, and the different chemistry causes the problem. All I know is, I've seen Energizer and Duracell alike leak, and also many other brands.I use Turnigy brand cells from Hobby King, as they are a lot cheaper than Eneloops, and as good, as near as I can tell. I am led to believe that the Ikea Ladda cells are made in the same factory as Eneloops, but some claim they are the reject ones.I use a Maha Powerex charger for the Ni-MH but I don't have a specific one for the Ni-Zn so I have to use a bench power supply for that...I believe one of the members here called HKJ has a website with reviews of many chargers and maybe batteries too?

author: bdunham7
author_rank: Super Contributor
timestamp: December 01, 2021, 09:05:44 pm
content: Quote from: AVGresponding on December 01, 2021, 08:50:44 pmIf your production line reject rate is enough to supply Ikea, you might have an issue or two.

author: AVGresponding
author_rank: Super Contributor
timestamp: December 02, 2021, 11:34:05 am
content: Quote from: bdunham7 on December 01, 2021, 09:05:44 pmIndeed. I suspect they are every bit as good as eneloops, I just don't have any personal experience.

author: Magnum
author_rank: Regular Contributor
timestamp: December 02, 2021, 06:56:21 pm
content: Unfortunately in German, but a very good comparison:https://www.pocketnavigation.de/2015/03/mignon-aa-akkus-test-vergleich/The 2450mAh Ikea Ladda were tested with 2509 mAh

author: monikersupreme
author_rank: Newbie
timestamp: December 03, 2021, 09:14:03 pm
content: Quote from: AVGresponding on December 01, 2021, 08:50:44 pmIf Eneloops are the gold standard then I don't mind splurging on a set since I suspect they will last me for quite awhile:https://www.amazon.com/Panasonic-BK-3MCCA8BA-eneloop-Pre-Charged-Rechargeable/dp/B00JHKSN5I/ref=sr_1_5?keywords=eneloop+aa&qid=1638565942&sr=8-5Are the higher capacity Eneloop Pro's "worth it" - and does the brand of the AA charger I use matter?

author: bdunham7
author_rank: Super Contributor
timestamp: December 03, 2021, 09:36:59 pm
content: Quote from: monikersupreme on December 03, 2021, 09:14:03 pmI'm not sure the Pro is worth it for low-drain devices. It is higher capacity and shorter overall life, although it is advertised as Low Self Discharge. The charger matters a lot--not just the brand--and there have been threads on this. You want a smart one, not a dumb 'timed' model. Even the Panasonic-branded ones vary--I have the BQ-CC17 which is good, but other ones are not. It only does 4 at at time, which means you have to think ahead. You need 12 batteries to be always ready.

author: monikersupreme
author_rank: Newbie
timestamp: December 04, 2021, 07:25:06 am
content: Quote from: AVGresponding on December 01, 2021, 08:50:44 pmWas this the site AVGreponding was referring to:http://lygte-info.dk/for reviews of chargers and batteries?