C-51
First Session, Thirty-eighth Parliament,
53-54 Elizabeth II, 2004-2005
HOUSE OF COMMONS OF CANADA
BILL C-51
An Act to amend the Judges Act, the Federal Courts Act and other Acts
first reading, May 20, 2005
THE MINISTER OF JUSTICE
90320
RECOMMENDATION
Her Excellency the Governor General recommends to the House of Commons the appropriation of public revenue under the circumstances, in the manner and for the purposes set out in a measure entitled “An Act to amend the Judges Act, the Federal Courts Act and other Acts”.
SUMMARY
This enactment amends the Judges Act to implement the federal government’s response to the report of the most recent Judicial Compensation and Benefits Commission regarding salaries and benefits of federally appointed judges. Included is a mechanism to divide judicial annuities upon breakdown of the conjugal relationship.
It permits the expansion of unified family courts by authorizing the payment of salaries for additional judges. As well, it increases the number of salaries authorized for judges of provincial superior courts.
It also makes certain amendments to the Federal Courts Act, notably for the establishment of an independent committee to make recommendations on the compensation of Federal Court prothonotaries.
In addition, it makes a number of technical amendments to various other Acts in relation to courts.
Also available on the Parliament of Canada Web Site at the following address:http://www.parl.gc.ca
TABLE OF PROVISIONS
AN ACT TO AMEND THE JUDGES ACT, THE FEDERAL COURTS ACT AND OTHER ACTS
PART 1
AMENDMENTS TO THE JUDGES ACT
1-14.       Judges Act
PART 2
AMENDMENTS TO THE FEDERAL COURTS ACT
15-20.       Federal Courts Act
PART 3
AMENDMENTS TO OTHER ACTS
21.       Canada Transportation Act
22.       Criminal Code
23.       Crown Liability and Proceedings Act
24.       Employment Insurance Act
25.       Nunavut Act
26.       Pesticide Residue Compensation Act
27.       Railway Safety Act
28-36.       Tax Court of Canada Act
37.       Yukon Act
COMING INTO FORCE
38.       Order in council
39.       Section 44.2 of the Judges Act
.vis1 {position: absolute;display:block;}
.vis2 {position: static;}
1st Session, 38th Parliament,
53-54 Elizabeth II, 2004-2005
house of commons of canada
BILL C-51
An Act to amend the Judges Act, the Federal Courts Act and other Acts
Her Majesty, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate and House of Commons of Canada, enacts as follows:
PART 1
R.S., c. J-1
AMENDMENTS TO THE JUDGES ACT
1992, c. 51, s. 2(2); 2002, c. 8, s. 82(E)
1. The definition “judge” in section 2 of the Judges Act is replaced by the following:
Explanatory NotesJudges Act
Clause 1: Existing text of the definition:
“judge” includes a chief justice, senior associate chief justice, associate chief justice, supernumerary judge, chief judge, associate chief judge, senior judge and regional senior judge;
Notes explicativesLoi sur les juges
Article 1 : Texte de la définition :
« juge » Sont compris parmi les juges les juges en chef, juges en chef associés, juges en chef adjoints, juges surnuméraires, juges principaux et juges principaux régionaux.
“judge”« juge »
“judge” includes a chief justice, senior associate chief justice, associate chief justice, supernumerary judge and regional senior judge;
R.S., c. 39 (3rd Supp.), s. 1(1), c. 51, 4th Supp., s. 13; 1992, c. 51, s. 5(1); 1998, c. 30, s. 2(1); 2001, c. 7, ss. 1-13; 2002, c. 8, ss. 83, 84(E)
2. Sections 9 to 21 of the Act are replaced by the following:
Clause 2: Existing text of sections 9 to 21:
9. The yearly salaries of the judges of the Supreme Court of Canada are as follows:
(a) The Chief Justice of Canada
(i) for the period beginning April 1, 2000 and ending March 31, 2001, $254,500,
(ii) for the period beginning April 1, 2001 and ending March 31, 2002, the amount that ensures that the ratio between the salary of the Chief Justice and the salary for that period of a judge referred to in paragraph 10(b) remains the same as the ratio between $254,500 and $198,000,
(iii) for the period beginning April 1, 2002 and ending March 31, 2003, the amount that ensures that the ratio between the salary of the Chief Justice and the salary for that period of a judge referred to in paragraph 10(b) remains the same as the ratio between $254,500 and $198,000, and
(iv) for the period beginning April 1, 2003 and ending March 31, 2004, the amount that ensures that the ratio between the salary of the Chief Justice and the salary for that period of a judge referred to in paragraph 10(b) remains the same as the ratio between $254,500 and $198,000; and
(b) Eight puisne judges, each
(i) for the period beginning April 1, 2000 and ending March 31, 2001, $235,700,
(ii) for the period beginning April 1, 2001 and ending March 31, 2002, the amount that ensures that the ratio between the salary of the judge and the salary for that period of a judge referred to in paragraph 10(b) remains the same as the ratio between $235,700 and $198,000,
(iii) for the period beginning April 1, 2002 and ending March 31, 2003, the amount that ensures that the ratio between the salary of the judge and the salary for that period of a judge referred to in paragraph 10(b) remains the same as the ratio between $235,700 and $198,000, and
(iv) for the period beginning April 1, 2003 and ending March 31, 2004, the amount that ensures that the ratio between the salary of the judge and the salary for that period of a judge referred to in paragraph 10(b) remains the same as the ratio between $235,700 and $198,000.
10. The yearly salaries of the judges of the Federal Court are as follows:
(a) The Chief Justice of the Federal Court
(i) for the period beginning April 1, 2000 and ending March 31, 2001, $217,100,
(ii) for the period beginning April 1, 2001 and ending March 31, 2002, the amount that ensures that the ratio between the salary of the Chief Justice and the salary for that period of a judge referred to in paragraph (b) remains the same as the ratio between $217,100 and $198,000,
(iii) for the period beginning April 1, 2002 and ending March 31, 2003, the amount that ensures that the ratio between the salary of the Chief Justice and the salary for that period of a judge referred to in paragraph (b) remains the same as the ratio between $217,100 and $198,000, and
(iv) for the period beginning April 1, 2003 and ending March 31, 2004, the amount that ensures that the ratio between the salary of the Chief Justice and the salary for that period of a judge referred to in paragraph (b) remains the same as the ratio between $217,100 and $198,000;
(b) The other judges of the Federal Court of Appeal, each
(i) for the period beginning April 1, 2000 and ending March 31, 2001, $198,000,
(ii) for the period beginning April 1, 2001 and ending March 31, 2002, $200,000, plus the annual adjustment calculated under subsection 25(1),
(iii) for the period beginning April 1, 2002 and ending March 31, 2003, the amount received for the period referred to in subparagraph (ii), plus $2,000 and the annual adjustment calculated under subsection 25(1), and
(iv) for the period beginning April 1, 2003 and ending March 31, 2004, the amount received for the period referred to in subparagraph (iii), plus $2,000 and the annual adjustment calculated under subsection 25(1);
(c) The Associate Chief Justice of the Federal Court
(i) for the period beginning April 1, 2000 and ending March 31, 2001, $217,100,
(ii) for the period beginning April 1, 2001 and ending March 31, 2002, the amount that ensures that the ratio between the salary of the Associate Chief Justice and the salary for that period of a judge referred to in paragraph (d) remains the same as the ratio between $217,100 and $198,000,
(iii) for the period beginning April 1, 2002 and ending March 31, 2003, the amount that ensures that the ratio between the salary of the Associate Chief Justice and the salary for that period of a judge referred to in paragraph (d) remains the same as the ratio between $217,100 and $198,000, and
(iv) for the period beginning April 1, 2003 and ending March 31, 2004, the amount that ensures that the ratio between the salary of the Associate Chief Justice and the salary for that period of a judge referred to in paragraph (d) remains the same as the ratio between $217,100 and $198,000; and
(d) The other judges of the Trial Division, each
(i) for the period beginning April 1, 2000 and ending March 31, 2001, $198,000,
(ii) for the period beginning April 1, 2001 and ending March 31, 2002, $200,000, plus the annual adjustment calculated under subsection 25(1),
(iii) for the period beginning April 1, 2002 and ending March 31, 2003, the amount received for the period referred to in subparagraph (ii), plus $2,000 and the annual adjustment calculated under subsection 25(1), and
(iv) for the period beginning April 1, 2003 and ending March 31, 2004, the amount received for the period referred to in subparagraph (iii), plus $2,000 and the annual adjustment calculated under subsection 25(1).
11. The yearly salaries of the judges of the Tax Court of Canada are as follows:
(a) The Chief Judge
(i) for the period beginning April 1, 2000 and ending March 31, 2001, $217,100,
(ii) for the period beginning April 1, 2001 and ending March 31, 2002, the amount that ensures that the ratio between the salary of the Chief Judge and the salary for that period of a judge referred to in paragraph (c) remains the same as the ratio between $217,100 and $198,000,
(iii) for the period beginning April 1, 2002 and ending March 31, 2003, the amount that ensures that the ratio between the salary of the Chief Judge and the salary for that period of a judge referred to in paragraph (c) remains the same as the ratio between $217,100 and $198,000, and
(iv) for the period beginning April 1, 2003 and ending March 31, 2004, the amount that ensures that the ratio between the salary of the Chief Judge and the salary for that period of a judge referred to in paragraph (c) remains the same as the ratio between $217,100 and $198,000;
(b) The Associate Chief Judge
(i) for the period beginning April 1, 2000 and ending March 31, 2001, $217,100,
(ii) for the period beginning April 1, 2001 and ending March 31, 2002, the amount that ensures that the ratio between the salary of the Associate Chief Judge and the salary for that period of a judge referred to in paragraph (c) remains the same as the ratio between $217,100 and $198,000,
(iii) for the period beginning April 1, 2002 and ending March 31, 2003, the amount that ensures that the ratio between the salary of the Associate Chief Judge and the salary for that period of a judge referred to in paragraph (c) remains the same as the ratio between $217,100 and $198,000, and
(iv) for the period beginning April 1, 2003 and ending March 31, 2004, the amount that ensures that the ratio between the salary of the Associate Chief Judge and the salary for that period of a judge referred to in paragraph (c) remains the same as the ratio between $217,100 and $198,000; and
(c) The other judges, each
(i) for the period beginning April 1, 2000 and ending March 31, 2001, $198,000,
(ii) for the period beginning April 1, 2001 and ending March 31, 2002, $200,000, plus the annual adjustment calculated under subsection 25(1),
(iii) for the period beginning April 1, 2002 and ending March 31, 2003, the amount received for the period referred to in subparagraph (ii), plus $2,000 and the annual adjustment calculated under subsection 25(1), and
(iv) for the period beginning April 1, 2003 and ending March 31, 2004, the amount received for the period referred to in subparagraph (iii), plus $2,000 and the annual adjustment calculated under subsection 25(1).
12. The yearly salaries of the judges of the Court of Appeal for Ontario and of the Superior Court of Justice in and for the Province of Ontario are as follows:
(a) The Chief Justice and the Associate Chief Justice of Ontario, each
(i) for the period beginning April 1, 2000 and ending March 31, 2001, $217,100,
(ii) for the period beginning April 1, 2001 and ending March 31, 2002, the amount that ensures that the ratio between their respective salaries and the salary for that period of a justice referred to in paragraph (b) remains the same as the ratio between $217,100 and $198,000,
(iii) for the period beginning April 1, 2002 and ending March 31, 2003, the amount that ensures that the ratio between their respective salaries and the salary for that period of a justice referred to in paragraph (b) remains the same as the ratio between $217,100 and $198,000, and
(iv) for the period beginning April 1, 2003 and ending March 31, 2004, the amount that ensures that the ratio between their respective salaries and the salary for that period of a justice referred to in paragraph (b) remains the same as the ratio between $217,100 and $198,000;
(b) Fourteen Justices of Appeal, each
(i) for the period beginning April 1, 2000 and ending March 31, 2001, $198,000,
(ii) for the period beginning April 1, 2001 and ending March 31, 2002, $200,000, plus the annual adjustment calculated under subsection 25(1),
(iii) for the period beginning April 1, 2002 and ending March 31, 2003, the amount received for the period referred to in subparagraph (ii), plus $2,000 and the annual adjustment calculated under subsection 25(1), and
(iv) for the period beginning April 1, 2003 and ending March 31, 2004, the amount received for the period referred to in subparagraph (iii), plus $2,000 and the annual adjustment calculated under subsection 25(1);
(c) The Chief Justice and the Associate Chief Justice of the Superior Court of Justice, each
(i) for the period beginning April 1, 2000 and ending March 31, 2001, $217,100,
(ii) for the period beginning April 1, 2001 and ending March 31, 2002, the amount that ensures that the ratio between their respective salaries and the salary for that period of a judge referred to in paragraph (d) remains the same as the ratio between $217,100 and $198,000,
(iii) for the period beginning April 1, 2002 and ending March 31, 2003, the amount that ensures that the ratio between their respective salaries and the salary for that period of a judge referred to in paragraph (d) remains the same as the ratio between $217,100 and $198,000, and
(iv) for the period beginning April 1, 2003 and ending March 31, 2004, the amount that ensures that the ratio between their respective salaries and the salary for that period of a judge referred to in paragraph (d) remains the same as the ratio between $217,100 and $198,000; and
(d) One hundred and ninety-two other judges of the Superior Court of Justice, each
(i) for the period beginning April 1, 2000 and ending March 31, 2001, $198,000,
(ii) for the period beginning April 1, 2001 and ending March 31, 2002, $200,000, plus the annual adjustment calculated under subsection 25(1),
(iii) for the period beginning April 1, 2002 and ending March 31, 2003, the amount received for the period referred to in subparagraph (ii), plus $2,000 and the annual adjustment calculated under subsection 25(1), and
(iv) for the period beginning April 1, 2003 and ending March 31, 2004, the amount received for the period referred to in subparagraph (iii), plus $2,000 and the annual adjustment calculated under subsection 25(1).
13. The yearly salaries of the judges of the Court of Appeal and of the Superior Court in and for the Province of Quebec are as follows:
(a) The Chief Justice of Quebec
(i) for the period beginning April 1, 2000 and ending March 31, 2001, $217,100,
(ii) for the period beginning April 1, 2001 and ending March 31, 2002, the amount that ensures that the ratio between the salary of the Chief Justice and the salary for that period of a puisne judge referred to in paragraph (b) remains the same as the ratio between $217,100 and $198,000,
(iii) for the period beginning April 1, 2002 and ending March 31, 2003, the amount that ensures that the ratio between the salary of the Chief Justice and the salary for that period of a puisne judge referred to in paragraph (b) remains the same as the ratio between $217,100 and $198,000, and
(iv) for the period beginning April 1, 2003 and ending March 31, 2004, the amount that ensures that the ratio between the salary of the Chief Justice and the salary for that period of a puisne judge referred to in paragraph (b) remains the same as the ratio between $217,100 and $198,000;
(b) Eighteen puisne judges of the Court of Appeal, each
(i) for the period beginning April 1, 2000 and ending March 31, 2001, $198,000,
(ii) for the period beginning April 1, 2001 and ending March 31, 2002, $200,000, plus the annual adjustment calculated under subsection 25(1),
(iii) for the period beginning April 1, 2002 and ending March 31, 2003, the amount received for the period referred to in subparagraph (ii), plus $2,000 and the annual adjustment calculated under subsection 25(1), and
(iv) for the period beginning April 1, 2003 and ending March 31, 2004, the amount received for the period referred to in subparagraph (iii), plus $2,000 and the annual adjustment calculated under subsection 25(1);
(c) The Chief Justice, the Senior Associate Chief Justice and the Associate Chief Justice of the Superior Court, each
(i) for the period beginning April 1, 2000 and ending March 31, 2001, $217,100,
(ii) for the period beginning April 1, 2001 and ending March 31, 2002, the amount that ensures that the ratio between their respective salaries and the salary for that period of a puisne judge referred to in paragraph (d) remains the same as the ratio between $217,100 and $198,000,
(iii) for the period beginning April 1, 2002 and ending March 31, 2003, the amount that ensures that the ratio between their respective salaries and the salary for that period of a puisne judge referred to in paragraph (d) remains the same as the ratio between $217,100 and $198,000, and
(iv) for the period beginning April 1, 2003 and ending March 31, 2004, the amount that ensures that the ratio between their respective salaries and the salary for that period of a puisne judge referred to in paragraph (d) remains the same as the ratio between $217,100 and $198,000; and
(d) One hundred and forty puisne judges of the Superior Court, each
(i) for the period beginning April 1, 2000 and ending March 31, 2001, $198,000,
(ii) for the period beginning April 1, 2001 and ending March 31, 2002, $200,000, plus the annual adjustment calculated under subsection 25(1),
(iii) for the period beginning April 1, 2002 and ending March 31, 2003, the amount received for the period referred to in subparagraph (ii), plus $2,000 and the annual adjustment calculated under subsection 25(1), and
(iv) for the period beginning April 1, 2003 and ending March 31, 2004, the amount received for the period referred to in subparagraph (iii), plus $2,000 and the annual adjustment calculated under subsection 25(1).
14. The yearly salaries of the judges of the Nova Scotia Court of Appeal and the Supreme Court of Nova Scotia are as follows:
(a) The Chief Justice of Nova Scotia
(i) for the period beginning April 1, 2000 and ending March 31, 2001, $217,100,
(ii) for the period beginning April 1, 2001 and ending March 31, 2002, the amount that ensures that the ratio between the salary of the Chief Justice and the salary for that period of a judge referred to in paragraph (b) remains the same as the ratio between $217,100 and $198,000,
(iii) for the period beginning April 1, 2002 and ending March 31, 2003, the amount that ensures that the ratio between the salary of the Chief Justice and the salary for that period of a judge referred to in paragraph (b) remains the same as the ratio between $217,100 and $198,000, and
(iv) for the period beginning April 1, 2003 and ending March 31, 2004, the amount that ensures that the ratio between the salary of the Chief Justice and the salary for that period of a judge referred to in paragraph (b) remains the same as the ratio between $217,100 and $198,000;
(b) Seven other judges of the Court of Appeal, each
(i) for the period beginning April 1, 2000 and ending March 31, 2001, $198,000,
(ii) for the period beginning April 1, 2001 and ending March 31, 2002, $200,000, plus the annual adjustment calculated under subsection 25(1),
(iii) for the period beginning April 1, 2002 and ending March 31, 2003, the amount received for the period referred to in subparagraph (ii), plus $2,000 and the annual adjustment calculated under subsection 25(1), and
(iv) for the period beginning April 1, 2003 and ending March 31, 2004, the amount received for the period referred to in subparagraph (iii), plus $2,000 and the annual adjustment calculated under subsection 25(1);
(c) The Chief Justice and the Associate Chief Justice of the Supreme Court
(i) for the period beginning April 1, 2000 and ending March 31, 2001, $217,100,
(ii) for the period beginning April 1, 2001 and ending March 31, 2002, the amount that ensures that the ratio between their respective salaries and the salary for that period of a judge referred to in paragraph (d) remains the same as the ratio between $217,100 and $198,000,
(iii) for the period beginning April 1, 2002 and ending March 31, 2003, the amount that ensures that the ratio between their respective salaries and the salary for that period of a judge referred to in paragraph (d) remains the same as the ratio between $217,100 and $198,000, and
(iv) for the period beginning April 1, 2003 and ending March 31, 2004, the amount that ensures that the ratio between their respective salaries and the salary for that period of a judge referred to in paragraph (d) remains the same as the ratio between $217,100 and $198,000; and
(d) Twenty-three other judges of the Supreme Court, each
(i) for the period beginning April 1, 2000 and ending March 31, 2001, $198,000,
(ii) for the period beginning April 1, 2001 and ending March 31, 2002, $200,000, plus the annual adjustment referred to in subsection 25(1),
(iii) for the period beginning April 1, 2002 and ending March 31, 2003, the amount received for the period referred to in subparagraph (ii), plus $2,000 and the annual adjustment referred to in subsection 25(1), and
(iv) for the period beginning April 1, 2003 and ending March 31, 2004, the amount received for the period referred to in subparagraph (iii), plus $2,000 and the annual adjustment referred to in subsection 25(1).
15. The yearly salaries of the judges of the Court of Appeal of New Brunswick and of the Court of Queen’s Bench of New Brunswick are as follows:
(a) The Chief Justice of New Brunswick
(i) for the period beginning April 1, 2000 and ending March 31, 2001, $217,100,
(ii) for the period beginning April 1, 2001 and ending March 31, 2002, the amount that ensures that the ratio between the salary of the Chief Justice and the salary for that period of a judge referred to in paragraph (b) remains the same as the ratio between $217,100 and $198,000,
(iii) for the period beginning April 1, 2002 and ending March 31, 2003, the amount that ensures that the ratio between the salary of the Chief Justice and the salary for that period of a judge referred to in paragraph (b) remains the same as the ratio between $217,100 and $198,000, and
(iv) for the period beginning April 1, 2003 and ending March 31, 2004, the amount that ensures that the ratio between the salary of the Chief Justice and the salary for that period of a judge referred to in paragraph (b) remains the same as the ratio between $217,100 and $198,000;
(b) Five other judges of the Court of Appeal, each
(i) for the period beginning April 1, 2000 and ending March 31, 2001, $198,000,
(ii) for the period beginning April 1, 2001 and ending March 31, 2002, $200,000, plus the annual adjustment calculated under subsection 25(1),
(iii) for the period beginning April 1, 2002 and ending March 31, 2003, the amount received for the period referred to in subparagraph (ii), plus $2,000 and the annual adjustment calculated under subsection 25(1), and
(iv) for the period beginning April 1, 2003 and ending March 31, 2004, the amount received for the period referred to in subparagraph (iii), plus $2,000 and the annual adjustment calculated under subsection 25(1);
(c) The Chief Justice of the Court of Queen’s Bench
(i) for the period beginning April 1, 2000 and ending March 31, 2001, $217,100,
(ii) for the period beginning April 1, 2001 and ending March 31, 2002, the amount that ensures that the ratio between the salary of the Chief Justice and the salary for that period of a judge referred to in paragraph (d) remains the same as the ratio between $217,100 and $198,000,
(iii) for the period beginning April 1, 2002 and ending March 31, 2003, the amount that ensures that the ratio between the salary of the Chief Justice and the salary for that period of a judge referred to in paragraph (d) remains the same as the ratio between $217,100 and $198,000, and
(iv) for the period beginning April 1, 2003 and ending March 31, 2004, the amount that ensures that the ratio between the salary of the Chief Justice and the salary for that period of a judge referred to in paragraph (d) remains the same as the ratio between $217,100 and $198,000; and
(d) Twenty-one other judges of the Court of Queen’s Bench, each
(i) for the period beginning April 1, 2000 and ending March 31, 2001, $198,000,
(ii) for the period beginning April 1, 2001 and ending March 31, 2002, $200,000, plus the annual adjustment calculated under subsection 25(1),
(iii) for the period beginning April 1, 2002 and ending March 31, 2003, the amount received for the period referred to in subparagraph (ii), plus $2,000 and the annual adjustment calculated under subsection 25(1), and
(iv) for the period beginning April 1, 2003 and ending March 31, 2004, the amount received for the period referred to in subparagraph (iii), plus $2,000 and the annual adjustment calculated under subsection 25(1).
16. The yearly salaries of the judges of the Court of Appeal for Manitoba and of Her Majesty’s Court of Queen’s Bench for Manitoba are as follows:
(a) The Chief Justice of Manitoba
(i) for the period beginning April 1, 2000 and ending March 31, 2001, $217,100,
(ii) for the period beginning April 1, 2001 and ending March 31, 2002, the amount that ensures that the ratio between the salary of the Chief Justice and the salary for that period of a judge referred to in paragraph (b) remains the same as the ratio between $217,100 and $198,000,
(iii) for the period beginning April 1, 2002 and ending March 31, 2003, the amount that ensures that the ratio between the salary of the Chief Justice and the salary for that period of a judge referred to in paragraph (b) remains the same as the ratio between $217,100 and $198,000, and
(iv) for the period beginning April 1, 2003 and ending March 31, 2004, the amount that ensures that the ratio between the salary of the Chief Justice and the salary for that period of a judge referred to in paragraph (b) remains the same as the ratio between $217,100 and $198,000;
(b) Six Judges of Appeal, each
(i) for the period beginning April 1, 2000 and ending March 31, 2001, $198,000,
(ii) for the period beginning April 1, 2001 and ending March 31, 2002, $200,000, plus the annual adjustment calculated under subsection 25(1),
(iii) for the period beginning April 1, 2002 and ending March 31, 2003, the amount received for the period referred to in subparagraph (ii), plus $2,000 and the annual adjustment calculated under subsection 25(1), and
(iv) for the period beginning April 1, 2003 and ending March 31, 2004, the amount received for the period referred to in subparagraph (iii), plus $2,000 and the annual adjustment calculated under subsection 25(1);
(c) The Chief Justice, the Senior Associate Chief Justice and the Associate Chief Justice of the Court of Queen’s Bench, each
(i) for the period beginning April 1, 2000 and ending March 31, 2001, $217,100,
(ii) for the period beginning April 1, 2001 and ending March 31, 2002, the amount that ensures that the ratio between their respective salaries and the salary for that period of a puisne judge referred to in paragraph (d) remains the same as the ratio between $217,100 and $198,000,
(iii) for the period beginning April 1, 2002 and ending March 31, 2003, the amount that ensures that the ratio between their respective salaries and the salary for that period of a puisne judge referred to in paragraph (d) remains the same as the ratio between $217,100 and $198,000, and
(iv) for the period beginning April 1, 2003 and ending March 31, 2004, the amount that ensures that the ratio between their respective salaries and the salary for that period of a puisne judge referred to in paragraph (d) remains the same as the ratio between $217,100 and $198,000; and
(d) Thirty puisne judges of the Court of Queen’s Bench,
(i) for the period beginning April 1, 2000 and ending March 31, 2001, $198,000,
(ii) for the period beginning April 1, 2001 and ending March 31, 2002, $200,000, plus the annual adjustment calculated under subsection 25(1),
(iii) for the period beginning April 1, 2002 and ending March 31, 2003, the amount received for the period referred to in subparagraph (ii), plus $2,000 and the annual adjustment calculated under subsection 25(1), and
(iv) for the period beginning April 1, 2003 and ending March 31, 2004, the amount received for the period referred to in subparagraph (iii), plus $2,000 and the annual adjustment calculated under subsection 25(1).
17. The yearly salaries of the judges of the Court of Appeal for British Columbia and of the Supreme Court of British Columbia are as follows:
(a) The Chief Justice of British Columbia
(i) for the period beginning April 1, 2000 and ending March 31, 2001, $217,100,
(ii) for the period beginning April 1, 2001 and ending March 31, 2002, the amount that ensures that the ratio between the salary of the Chief Justice and the salary for that period of a justice referred to in paragraph (b) remains the same as the ratio between $217,100 and $198,000,
(iii) for the period beginning April 1, 2002 and ending March 31, 2003, the amount that ensures that the ratio between the salary of the Chief Justice and the salary for that period of a justice referred to in paragraph (b) remains the same as the ratio between $217,100 and $198,000, and
(iv) for the period beginning April 1, 2003 and ending March 31, 2004, the amount that ensures that the ratio between the salary of the Chief Justice and the salary for that period of a justice referred to in paragraph (b) remains the same as the ratio between $217,100 and $198,000;
(b) Twelve Justices of Appeal, each
(i) for the period beginning April 1, 2000 and ending March 31, 2001, $198,000,
(ii) for the period beginning April 1, 2001 and ending March 31, 2002, $200,000, plus the annual adjustment calculated under subsection 25(1),
(iii) for the period beginning April 1, 2002 and ending March 31, 2003, the amount received for the period referred to in subparagraph (ii), plus $2,000 and the annual adjustment calculated under subsection 25(1), and
(iv) for the period beginning April 1, 2003 and ending March 31, 2004, the amount received for the period referred to in subparagraph (iii), plus $2,000 and the annual adjustment calculated under subsection 25(1);
(c) The Chief Justice of the Supreme Court
(i) for the period beginning April 1, 2000 and ending March 31, 2001, $217,100,
(ii) for the period beginning April 1, 2001 and ending March 31, 2002, the amount that ensures that the ratio between the salary of the Chief Justice and the salary for that period of a judge referred to in paragraph (d) remains the same as the ratio between $217,100 and $198,000,
(iii) for the period beginning April 1, 2002 and ending March 31, 2003, the amount that ensures that the ratio between the salary of the Chief Justice and the salary for that period of a judge referred to in paragraph (d) remains the same as the ratio between $217,100 and $198,000, and
(iv) for the period beginning April 1, 2003 and ending March 31, 2004, the amount that ensures that the ratio between the salary of the Chief Justice and the salary for that period of a judge referred to in paragraph (d) remains the same as the ratio between $217,100 and $198,000;
(c.1) The Associate Chief Justice of the Supreme Court
(i) for the period beginning April 1, 2000 and ending March 31, 2001, $217,100,
(ii) for the period beginning April 1, 2001 and ending March 31, 2002, the amount that ensures that the ratio between the salary of the Associate Chief Justice and the salary for that period of a judge referred to in paragraph (d) remains the same as the ratio between $217,100 and $198,000,
(iii) for the period beginning April 1, 2002 and ending March 31, 2003, the amount that ensures that the ratio between the salary of the Associate Chief Justice and the salary for that period of a judge referred to in paragraph (d) remains the same as the ratio between $217,100 and $198,000, and
(iv) for the period beginning April 1, 2003 and ending March 31, 2004, the amount that ensures that the ratio between the salary of the Associate Chief Justice and the salary for that period of a judge referred to in paragraph (d) remains the same as the ratio between $217,100 and $198,000; and
(d) Eighty-one other judges of the Supreme Court, each
(i) for the period beginning April 1, 2000 and ending March 31, 2001, $198,000,
(ii) for the period beginning April 1, 2001 and ending March 31, 2002, $200,000, plus the annual adjustment calculated under subsection 25(1),
(iii) for the period beginning April 1, 2002 and ending March 31, 2003, the amount received for the period referred to in subparagraph (ii), plus $2,000 and the annual adjustment calculated under subsection 25(1), and
(iv) for the period beginning April 1, 2003 and ending March 31, 2004, the amount received for the period referred to in subparagraph (iii), plus $2,000 and the annual adjustment calculated under subsection 25(1).
18. The yearly salaries of the judges of the Supreme Court of Prince Edward Island are as follows:
(a) The Chief Justice of Prince Edward Island
(i) for the period beginning April 1, 2000 and ending March 31, 2001, $217,100,
(ii) for the period beginning April 1, 2001 and ending March 31, 2002, the amount that ensures that the ratio between the salary of the Chief Justice and the salary for that period of a judge referred to in paragraph (b) remains the same as the ratio between $217,100 and $198,000,
(iii) for the period beginning April 1, 2002 and ending March 31, 2003, the amount that ensures that the ratio between the salary of the Chief Justice and the salary for that period of a judge referred to in paragraph (b) remains the same as the ratio between $217,100 and $198,000, and
(iv) for the period beginning April 1, 2003 and ending March 31, 2004, the amount that ensures that the ratio between the salary of the Chief Justice and the salary for that period of a judge referred to in paragraph (b) remains the same as the ratio between $217,100 and $198,000;
(b) Two other judges of the Appeal Division, each
(i) for the period beginning April 1, 2000 and ending March 31, 2001, $198,000,
(ii) for the period beginning April 1, 2001 and ending March 31, 2002, $200,000, plus the annual adjustment calculated under subsection 25(1),
(iii) for the period beginning April 1, 2002 and ending March 31, 2003, the amount received for the period referred to in subparagraph (ii), plus $2,000 and the annual adjustment calculated under subsection 25(1), and
(iv) for the period beginning April 1, 2003 and ending March 31, 2004, the amount received for the period referred to in subparagraph (iii), plus $2,000 and the annual adjustment calculated under subsection 25(1);
(c) The Chief Justice of the Trial Division
(i) for the period beginning April 1, 2000 and ending March 31, 2001, $217,100,
(ii) for the period beginning April 1, 2001 and ending March 31, 2002, the amount that ensures that the ratio between the salary of the Chief Justice and the salary for that period of a judge referred to in paragraph (d) remains the same as the ratio between $217,100 and $198,000,
(iii) for the period beginning April 1, 2002 and ending March 31, 2003, the amount that ensures that the ratio between the salary of the Chief Justice and the salary for that period of a judge referred to in paragraph (d) remains the same as the ratio between $217,100 and $198,000, and
(iv) for the period beginning April 1, 2003 and ending March 31, 2004, the amount that ensures that the ratio between the salary of the Chief Justice and the salary for that period of a judge referred to in paragraph (d) remains the same as the ratio between $217,100 and $198,000; and
(d) Three other judges of the Trial Division, each
(i) for the period beginning April 1, 2000 and ending March 31, 2001, $198,000,
(ii) for the period beginning April 1, 2001 and ending March 31, 2002, $200,000, plus the annual adjustment calculated under subsection 25(1),
(iii) for the period beginning April 1, 2002 and ending March 31, 2003, the amount received for the period referred to in subparagraph (ii), plus $2,000 and the annual adjustment calculated under subsection 25(1), and
(iv) for the period beginning April 1, 2003 and ending March 31, 2004, the amount received for the period referred to in subparagraph (iii), plus $2,000 and the annual adjustment calculated under subsection 25(1).
19. The yearly salaries of the judges of the Court of Appeal for Saskatchewan and of Her Majesty’s Court of Queen’s Bench for Saskatchewan are as follows:
(a) The Chief Justice of Saskatchewan
(i) for the period beginning April 1, 2000 and ending March 31, 2001, $217,100,
(ii) for the period beginning April 1, 2001 and ending March 31, 2002, the amount that ensures that the ratio between the salary of the Chief Justice and the salary for that period of a judge referred to in paragraph (b) remains the same as the ratio between $217,100 and $198,000,
(iii) for the period beginning April 1, 2002 and ending March 31, 2003, the amount that ensures that the ratio between the salary of the Chief Justice and the salary for that period of a judge referred to in paragraph (b) remains the same as the ratio between $217,100 and $198,000, and
(iv) for the period beginning April 1, 2003 and ending March 31, 2004, the amount that ensures that the ratio between the salary of the Chief Justice and the salary for that period of a judge referred to in paragraph (b) remains the same as the ratio between $217,100 and $198,000;
(b) Six Judges of Appeal, each
(i) for the period beginning April 1, 2000 and ending March 31, 2001, $198,000,
(ii) for the period beginning April 1, 2001 and ending March 31, 2002, $200,000, plus the annual adjustment calculated under subsection 25(1),
(iii) for the period beginning April 1, 2002 and ending March 31, 2003, the amount received for the period referred to in subparagraph (ii), plus $2,000 and the annual adjustment calculated under subsection 25(1), and
(iv) for the period beginning April 1, 2003 and ending March 31, 2004, the amount received for the period referred to in subparagraph (iii), plus $2,000 and the annual adjustment calculated under subsection 25(1);
(c) The Chief Justice of the Court of Queen’s Bench
(i) for the period beginning April 1, 2000 and ending March 31, 2001, $217,100,
(ii) for the period beginning April 1, 2001 and ending March 31, 2002, the amount that ensures that the ratio between the salary of the Chief Justice and the salary for that period of a judge referred to in paragraph (d) remains the same as the ratio between $217,100 and $198,000,
(iii) for the period beginning April 1, 2002 and ending March 31, 2003, the amount that ensures that the ratio between the salary of the Chief Justice and the salary for that period of a judge referred to in paragraph (d) remains the same as the ratio between $217,100 and $198,000, and
(iv) for the period beginning April 1, 2003 and ending March 31, 2004, the amount that ensures that the ratio between the salary of the Chief Justice and the salary for that period of a judge referred to in paragraph (d) remains the same as the ratio between $217,100 and $198,000; and
(d) Twenty-nine other judges of the Court of Queen’s Bench, each
(i) for the period beginning April 1, 2000 and ending March 31, 2001, $198,000,
(ii) for the period beginning April 1, 2001 and ending March 31, 2002, $200,000, plus the annual adjustment calculated under subsection 25(1),
(iii) for the period beginning April 1, 2002 and ending March 31, 2003, the amount received for the period referred to in subparagraph (ii), plus $2,000 and the annual adjustment calculated under subsection 25(1), and
(iv) for the period beginning April 1, 2003 and ending March 31, 2004, the amount received for the period referred to in subparagraph (iii), plus $2,000 and the annual adjustment calculated under subsection 25(1).
20. The yearly salaries of the judges of the Court of Appeal of Alberta and of the Court of Queen’s Bench of Alberta are as follows:
(a) The Chief Justice of Alberta
(i) for the period beginning April 1, 2000 and ending March 31, 2001, $217,100,
(ii) for the period beginning April 1, 2001 and ending March 31, 2002, the amount that ensures that the ratio between the salary of the Chief Justice and the salary for that period of a justice referred to in paragraph (b) remains the same as the ratio between $217,100 and $198,000,
(iii) for the period beginning April 1, 2002 and ending March 31, 2003, the amount that ensures that the ratio between the salary of the Chief Justice and the salary for that period of a justice referred to in paragraph (b) remains the same as the ratio between $217,100 and $198,000, and
(iv) for the period beginning April 1, 2003 and ending March 31, 2004, the amount that ensures that the ratio between the salary of the Chief Justice and the salary for that period of a justice referred to in paragraph (b) remains the same as the ratio between $217,100 and $198,000;
(b) Ten Justices of Appeal, each
(i) for the period beginning April 1, 2000 and ending March 31, 2001, $198,000,
(ii) for the period beginning April 1, 2001 and ending March 31, 2002, $200,000, plus the annual adjustment calculated under subsection 25(1),
(iii) for the period beginning April 1, 2002 and ending March 31, 2003, the amount received for the period referred to in subparagraph (ii), plus $2,000 and the annual adjustment calculated under subsection 25(1), and
(iv) for the period beginning April 1, 2003 and ending March 31, 2004, the amount received for the period referred to in subparagraph (iii), plus $2,000 and the annual adjustment calculated under subsection 25(1);
(c) The Chief Justice and the Associate Chief Justice of the Court of Queen’s Bench, each
(i) for the period beginning April 1, 2000 and ending March 31, 2001, $217,100,
(ii) for the period beginning April 1, 2001 and ending March 31, 2002, the amount that ensures that the ratio between their respective salaries and the salary for that period of a justice referred to in paragraph (d) remains the same as the ratio between $217,100 and $198,000,
(iii) for the period beginning April 1, 2002 and ending March 31, 2003, the amount that ensures that the ratio between their respective salaries and the salary for that period of a justice referred to in paragraph (d) remains the same as the ratio between $217,100 and $198,000, and
(iv) for the period beginning April 1, 2003 and ending March 31, 2004, the amount that ensures that the ratio between their respective salaries and the salary for that period of a justice referred to in paragraph (d) remains the same as the ratio between $217,100 and $198,000; and
(d) Fifty-five other Justices of the Court of Queen’s Bench, each
(i) for the period beginning April 1, 2000 and ending March 31, 2001, $198,000,
(ii) for the period beginning April 1, 2001 and ending March 31, 2002, $200,000, and the annual adjustment calculated under subsection 25(1),
(iii) for the period beginning April 1, 2002 and ending March 31, 2003, the amount received for the period referred to in subparagraph (ii), plus $2,000 and the annual adjustment calculated under subsection 25(1), and
(iv) for the period beginning April 1, 2003 and ending March 31, 2004, the amount received for the period referred to in subparagraph (iii), plus $2,000 and the annual adjustment calculated under subsection 25(1).
21. The yearly salaries of the judges of the Supreme Court of Newfoundland are as follows:
(a) The Chief Justice of Newfoundland
(i) for the period beginning April 1, 2000 and ending March 31, 2001, $217,100,
(ii) for the period beginning April 1, 2001 and ending March 31, 2002, the amount that ensures that the ratio between the salary of the Chief Justice and the salary for that period of a judge referred to in paragraph (b) remains the same as the ratio between $217,100 and $198,000,
(iii) for the period beginning April 1, 2002 and ending March 31, 2003, the amount that ensures that the ratio between the salary of the Chief Justice and the salary for that period of a judge referred to in paragraph (b) remains the same as the ratio between $217,100 and $198,000, and
(iv) for the period beginning April 1, 2003 and ending March 31, 2004, the amount that ensures that the ratio between the salary of the Chief Justice and the salary for that period of a judge referred to in paragraph (b) remains the same as the ratio between $217,100 and $198,000;
(b) Five Judges of Appeal, each
(i) for the period beginning April 1, 2000 and ending March 31, 2001, $198,000,
(ii) for the period beginning April 1, 2001 and ending March 31, 2002, $200,000, plus the annual adjustment calculated under subsection 25(1),
(iii) for the period beginning April 1, 2002 and ending March 31, 2003, the amount received for the period referred to in subparagraph (ii), plus $2,000 and the annual adjustment calculated under subsection 25(1), and
(iv) for the period beginning April 1, 2003 and ending March 31, 2004, the amount received for the period referred to in subparagraph (iii), plus $2,000 and the annual adjustment calculated under subsection 25(1);
(c) The Chief Justice of the Trial Division
(i) for the period beginning April 1, 2000 and ending March 31, 2001, $217,100,
(ii) for the period beginning April 1, 2001 and ending March 31, 2002, the amount that ensures that the ratio between the salary of the Chief Justice and the salary for that period of a judge referred to in paragraph (d) remains the same as the ratio between $217,100 and $198,000,
(iii) for the period beginning April 1, 2002 and ending March 31, 2003, the amount that ensures that the ratio between the salary of the Chief Justice and the salary for that period of a judge referred to in paragraph (d) remains the same as the ratio between $217,100 and $198,000, and
(iv) for the period beginning April 1, 2003 and ending March 31, 2004, the amount that ensures that the ratio between the salary of the Chief Justice and the salary for that period of a judge referred to in paragraph (d) remains the same as the ratio between $217,100 and $198,000; and
(d) Eighteen other judges of the Trial Division, each
(i) for the period beginning April 1, 2000 and ending March 31, 2001, $198,000,
(ii) for the period beginning April 1, 2001 and ending March 31, 2002, $200,000, plus the annual adjustment calculated under subsection 25(1),
(iii) for the period beginning April 1, 2002 and ending March 31, 2003, the amount received for the period referred to in subparagraph (ii), plus $2,000 and the annual adjustment calculated under subsection 25(1), and
(iv) for the period beginning April 1, 2003 and ending March 31, 2004, the amount received for the period referred to in subparagraph (iii), plus $2,000 and the annual adjustment calculated under subsection 25(1).
Article 2 : Texte des articles 9 à 21 :
9. Les juges de la Cour suprême du Canada reçoivent les traitements annuels suivants :
a) s’agissant du juge en chef du Canada :
(i) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2000 au 31 mars 2001, 254 500 $,
(ii) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2001 au 31 mars 2002, la somme qui fait en sorte que le rapport entre le traitement du juge en chef et celui, pour la même période, d’un juge visé à l’alinéa 10b) reste le même qu’entre 254 500 $ et 198 000 $,
(iii) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2002 au 31 mars 2003, la somme qui fait en sorte que le rapport entre le traitement du juge en chef et celui, pour la même période, d’un juge visé à l’alinéa 10b) reste le même qu’entre 254 500 $ et 198 000 $,
(iv) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2003 au 31 mars 2004, la somme qui fait en sorte que le rapport entre le traitement du juge en chef et celui, pour la même période, d’un juge visé à l’alinéa 10b) reste le même qu’entre 254 500 $ et 198 000 $;
b) s’agissant de chacun des huit autres juges :
(i) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2000 au 31 mars 2001, 235 700 $,
(ii) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2001 au 31 mars 2002, la somme qui fait en sorte que le rapport entre le traitement du juge et celui, pour la même période, d’un juge visé à l’alinéa 10b) reste le même qu’entre 235 700 $ et 198 000 $,
(iii) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2002 au 31 mars 2003, la somme qui fait en sorte que le rapport entre le traitement du juge et celui, pour la même période, d’un juge visé à l’alinéa 10b) reste le même qu’entre 235 700 $ et 198 000 $,
(iv) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2003 au 31 mars 2004, la somme qui fait en sorte que le rapport entre le traitement du juge et celui, pour la même période, d’un juge visé à l’alinéa 10b) reste le même qu’entre 235 700 $ et 198 000 $.
10. Les juges de la Cour fédérale reçoivent les traitements annuels suivants :
a) s’agissant du juge en chef de la Cour d’appel fédérale :
(i) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2000 au 31 mars 2001, 217 100 $,
(ii) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2001 au 31 mars 2002, la somme qui fait en sorte que le rapport entre le traitement du juge en chef et celui, pour la même période, d’un juge visé à l’alinéa b) reste le même qu’entre 217 100 $ et 198 000 $,
(iii) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2002 au 31 mars 2003, la somme qui fait en sorte que le rapport entre le traitement du juge en chef et celui, pour la même période, d’un juge visé à l’alinéa b) reste le même qu’entre 217 100 $ et 198 000 $,
(iv) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2003 au 31 mars 2004, la somme qui fait en sorte que le rapport entre le traitement du juge en chef et celui, pour la même période, d’un juge visé à l’alinéa b) reste le même qu’entre 217 100 $ et 198 000 $;
b) s’agissant de chacun des autres juges de la Cour d’appel fédérale :
(i) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2000 au 31 mars 2001, 198 000 $,
(ii) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2001 au 31 mars 2002, 200 000 $, augmenté du rajustement annuel calculé en conformité avec le paragraphe 25(1),
(iii) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2002 au 31 mars 2003, la somme versée pour la période visée au sous-alinéa (ii), augmentée de 2 000 $ et du rajustement annuel calculé en conformité avec le paragraphe 25(1),
(iv) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2003 au 31 mars 2004, la somme versée pour la période visée au sous-alinéa (iii), augmentée de 2 000 $ et du rajustement annuel calculé en conformité avec le paragraphe 25(1);
c) s’agissant du juge en chef de la Cour fédérale :
(i) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2000 au 31 mars 2001, 217 100 $,
(ii) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2001 au 31 mars 2002, la somme qui fait en sorte que le rapport entre le traitement du juge en chef adjoint et celui, pour la même période, d’un juge visé à l’alinéa d) reste le même qu’entre 217 100 $ et 198 000 $,
(iii) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2002 au 31 mars 2003, la somme qui fait en sorte que le rapport entre le traitement du juge en chef adjoint et celui, pour la même période, d’un juge visé à l’alinéa d) reste le même qu’entre 217 100 $ et 198 000 $,
(iv) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2003 au 31 mars 2004, la somme qui fait en sorte que le rapport entre le traitement du juge en chef adjoint et celui, pour la même période, d’un juge visé à l’alinéa d) reste le même qu’entre 217 100 $ et 198 000 $;
d) s’agissant de chacun des autres juges de la Cour fédérale :
(i) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2000 au 31 mars 2001, 198 000 $,
(ii) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2001 au 31 mars 2002, 200 000 $, augmenté du rajustement annuel calculé en conformité avec le paragraphe 25(1),
(iii) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2002 au 31 mars 2003, la somme versée pour la période visée au sous-alinéa (ii), augmentée de 2 000 $ et du rajustement annuel calculé en conformité avec le paragraphe 25(1),
(iv) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2003 au 31 mars 2004, la somme versée pour la période visée au sous-alinéa (iii), augmentée de 2 000 $ et du rajustement annuel calculé en conformité avec le paragraphe 25(1).
11. Les juges de la Cour canadienne de l’impôt reçoivent les traitements annuels suivants :
a) s’agissant du juge en chef :
(i) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2000 au 31 mars 2001, 217 100 $,
(ii) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2001 au 31 mars 2002, la somme qui fait en sorte que le rapport entre le traitement du juge en chef et celui, pour la même période, d’un juge visé à l’alinéa c) reste le même qu’entre 217 100 $ et 198 000 $,
(iii) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2002 au 31 mars 2003, la somme qui fait en sorte que le rapport entre le traitement du juge en chef et celui, pour la même période, d’un juge visé à l’alinéa c) reste le même qu’entre 217 100 $ et 198 000 $,
(iv) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2003 au 31 mars 2004, la somme qui fait en sorte que le rapport entre le traitement du juge en chef et celui, pour la même période, d’un juge visé à l’alinéa c) reste le même qu’entre 217 100 $ et 198 000 $;
b) s’agissant du juge en chef adjoint :
(i) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2000 au 31 mars 2001, 217 100 $,
(ii) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2001 au 31 mars 2002, la somme qui fait en sorte que le rapport entre le traitement du juge en chef adjoint et celui, pour la même période, d’un juge visé à l’alinéa c) reste le même qu’entre 217 100 $ et 198 000 $,
(iii) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2002 au 31 mars 2003, la somme qui fait en sorte que le rapport entre le traitement du juge en chef adjoint et celui, pour la même période, d’un juge visé à l’alinéa c) reste le même qu’entre 217 100 $ et 198 000 $,
(iv) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2003 au 31 mars 2004, la somme qui fait en sorte que le rapport entre le traitement du juge en chef adjoint et celui, pour la même période, d’un juge visé à l’alinéa c) reste le même qu’entre 217 100 $ et 198 000 $;
c) s’agissant de chacun des autres juges :
(i) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2000 au 31 mars 2001, 198 000 $,
(ii) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2001 au 31 mars 2002, 200 000 $, augmenté du rajustement annuel calculé en conformité avec le paragraphe 25(1),
(iii) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2002 au 31 mars 2003, la somme versée pour la période visée au sous-alinéa (ii), augmentée de 2 000 $ et du rajustement annuel calculé en conformité avec le paragraphe 25(1),
(iv) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2003 au 31 mars 2004, la somme versée pour la période visée au sous-alinéa (iii), augmentée de 2 000 $ et du rajustement annuel calculé en conformité avec le paragraphe 25(1).
12. Les juges de la Cour d’appel de l’Ontario et de la Cour supérieure de justice de l’Ontario reçoivent les traitements annuels suivants :
a) s’agissant du juge en chef et du juge en chef adjoint de l’Ontario :
(i) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2000 au 31 mars 2001, 217 100 $,
(ii) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2001 au 31 mars 2002, la somme qui fait en sorte que le rapport entre leur traitement respectif et celui, pour la même période, d’un juge visé à l’alinéa b) reste le même qu’entre 217 100 $ et 198 000 $,
(iii) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2002 au 31 mars 2003, la somme qui fait en sorte que le rapport entre leur traitement respectif et celui, pour la même période, d’un juge visé à l’alinéa b) reste le même qu’entre 217 100 $ et 198 000 $,
(iv) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2003 au 31 mars 2004, la somme qui fait en sorte que le rapport entre leur traitement respectif et celui, pour la même période, d’un juge visé à l’alinéa b) reste le même qu’entre 217 100 $ et 198 000 $;
b) s’agissant de chacun des quatorze autres juges d’appel :
(i) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2000 au 31 mars 2001, 198 000 $,
(ii) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2001 au 31 mars 2002, 200 000 $, augmenté du rajustement annuel calculé en conformité avec le paragraphe 25(1),
(iii) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2002 au 31 mars 2003, la somme versée pour la période visée au sous-alinéa (ii), augmentée de 2 000 $ et du rajustement annuel calculé en conformité avec le paragraphe 25(1),
(iv) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2003 au 31 mars 2004, la somme versée pour la période visée au sous-alinéa (iii), augmentée de 2 000 $ et du rajustement annuel calculé en conformité avec le paragraphe 25(1);
c) s’agissant du juge en chef et du juge en chef adjoint de la Cour supérieure de justice :
(i) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2000 au 31 mars 2001, 217 100 $,
(ii) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2001 au 31 mars 2002, la somme qui fait en sorte que le rapport entre leur traitement respectif et celui, pour la même période, d’un juge visé à l’alinéa d) reste le même qu’entre 217 100 $ et 198 000 $,
(iii) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2002 au 31 mars 2003, la somme qui fait en sorte que le rapport entre leur traitement respectif et celui, pour la même période, d’un juge visé à l’alinéa d) reste le même qu’entre 217 100 $ et 198 000 $,
(iv) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2003 au 31 mars 2004, la somme qui fait en sorte que le rapport entre leur traitement respectif et celui, pour la même période, d’un juge visé à l’alinéa d) reste le même qu’entre 217 100 $ et 198 000 $;
d) s’agissant de chacun des cent quatre-vingt-douze autres juges de la Cour supérieure de justice :
(i) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2000 au 31 mars 2001, 198 000 $,
(ii) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2001 au 31 mars 2002, 200 000 $, augmenté du rajustement annuel calculé en conformité avec le paragraphe 25(1),
(iii) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2002 au 31 mars 2003, la somme versée pour la période visée au sous-alinéa (ii), augmentée de 2 000 $ et du rajustement annuel calculé en conformité avec le paragraphe 25(1),
(iv) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2003 au 31 mars 2004, la somme versée pour la période visée au sous-alinéa (iii), augmentée de 2 000 $ et du rajustement annuel calculé en conformité avec le paragraphe 25(1).
13. Les juges de la Cour d’appel et de la Cour supérieure du Québec reçoivent les traitements annuels suivants :
a) s’agissant du juge en chef du Québec :
(i) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2000 au 31 mars 2001, 217 100 $,
(ii) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2001 au 31 mars 2002, la somme qui fait en sorte que le rapport entre le traitement du juge en chef et celui, pour la même période, d’un juge visé à l’alinéa b) reste le même qu’entre 217 100 $ et 198 000 $,
(iii) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2002 au 31 mars 2003, la somme qui fait en sorte que le rapport entre le traitement du juge en chef et celui, pour la même période, d’un juge visé à l’alinéa b) reste le même qu’entre 217 100 $ et 198 000 $,
(iv) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2003 au 31 mars 2004, la somme qui fait en sorte que le rapport entre le traitement du juge en chef et celui, pour la même période, d’un juge visé à l’alinéa b) reste le même qu’entre 217 100 $ et 198 000 $;
b) s’agissant de chacun des dix-huit autres juges de la Cour d’appel :
(i) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2000 au 31 mars 2001, 198 000 $,
(ii) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2001 au 31 mars 2002, 200 000 $, augmenté du rajustement annuel calculé en conformité avec le paragraphe 25(1),
(iii) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2002 au 31 mars 2003, la somme versée pour la période visée au sous-alinéa (ii), augmentée de 2 000 $ et du rajustement annuel calculé en conformité avec le paragraphe 25(1),
(iv) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2003 au 31 mars 2004, la somme versée pour la période visée au sous-alinéa (iii), augmentée de 2 000 $ et du rajustement annuel calculé en conformité avec le paragraphe 25(1);
c) s’agissant du juge en chef, du juge en chef associé et du juge en chef adjoint de la Cour supérieure :
(i) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2000 au 31 mars 2001, 217 100 $,
(ii) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2001 au 31 mars 2002, la somme qui fait en sorte que le rapport entre leur traitement respectif et celui, pour la même période, d’un juge visé à l’alinéa d) reste le même qu’entre 217 100 $ et 198 000 $,
(iii) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2002 au 31 mars 2003, la somme qui fait en sorte que le rapport entre leur traitement respectif et celui, pour la même période, d’un juge visé à l’alinéa d) reste le même qu’entre 217 100 $ et 198 000 $,
(iv) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2003 au 31 mars 2004, la somme qui fait en sorte que le rapport entre leur traitement respectif et celui, pour la même période, d’un juge visé à l’alinéa d) reste le même qu’entre 217 100 $ et 198 000 $;
d) s’agissant de chacun des cent quarante autres juges de la Cour supérieure :
(i) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2000 au 31 mars 2001, 198 000 $,
(ii) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2001 au 31 mars 2002, 200 000 $, augmenté du rajustement annuel calculé en conformité avec le paragraphe 25(1),
(iii) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2002 au 31 mars 2003, la somme versée pour la période visée au sous-alinéa (ii), augmentée de 2 000 $ et du rajustement annuel calculé en conformité avec le paragraphe 25(1),
(iv) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2003 au 31 mars 2004, la somme versée pour la période visée au sous-alinéa (iii), augmentée de 2 000 $ et du rajustement annuel calculé en conformité avec le paragraphe 25(1).
14. Les juges de la Cour d’appel et de la Cour suprême de la Nouvelle-Écosse reçoivent les traitements annuels suivants :
a) s’agissant du juge en chef de la Nouvelle-Écosse :
(i) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2000 au 31 mars 2001, 217 100 $,
(ii) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2001 au 31 mars 2002, la somme qui fait en sorte que le rapport entre le traitement du juge en chef et celui, pour la même période, d’un juge visé à l’alinéa b) reste le même qu’entre 217 100 $ et 198 000 $,
(iii) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2002 au 31 mars 2003, la somme qui fait en sorte que le rapport entre le traitement du juge en chef et celui, pour la même période, d’un juge visé à l’alinéa b) reste le même qu’entre 217 100 $ et 198 000 $,
(iv) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2003 au 31 mars 2004, la somme qui fait en sorte que le rapport entre le traitement du juge en chef et celui, pour la même période, d’un juge visé à l’alinéa b) reste le même qu’entre 217 100 $ et 198 000 $;
b) s’agissant de chacun des sept autres juges de la Cour d’appel :
(i) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2000 au 31 mars 2001, 198 000 $,
(ii) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2001 au 31 mars 2002, 200 000 $, augmenté du rajustement annuel calculé en conformité avec le paragraphe 25(1),
(iii) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2002 au 31 mars 2003, la somme versée pour la période visée au sous-alinéa (ii), augmentée de 2 000 $ et du rajustement annuel calculé en conformité avec le paragraphe 25(1),
(iv) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2003 au 31 mars 2004, la somme versée pour la période visée au sous-alinéa (iii), augmentée de 2 000 $ et du rajustement annuel calculé en conformité avec le paragraphe 25(1);
c) s’agissant du juge en chef et du juge en chef adjoint de la Cour suprême :
(i) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2000 au 31 mars 2001, 217 100 $,
(ii) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2001 au 31 mars 2002, la somme qui fait en sorte que le rapport entre leur traitement respectif et celui, pour la même période, d’un juge visé à l’alinéa d) reste le même qu’entre 217 100 $ et 198 000 $,
(iii) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2002 au 31 mars 2003, la somme qui fait en sorte que le rapport entre leur traitement respectif et celui, pour la même période, d’un juge visé à l’alinéa d) reste le même qu’entre 217 100 $ et 198 000 $,
(iv) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2003 au 31 mars 2004, la somme qui fait en sorte que le rapport entre leur traitement respectif et celui, pour la même période, d’un juge visé à l’alinéa d) reste le même qu’entre 217 100 $ et 198 000 $;
d) s’agissant de chacun des vingt-trois autres juges de la Cour suprême :
(i) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2000 au 31 mars 2001, 198 000 $,
(ii) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2001 au 31 mars 2002, 200 000 $, augmenté du rajustement annuel calculé en conformité avec le paragraphe 25(1),
(iii) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2002 au 31 mars 2003, la somme versée pour la période visée au sous-alinéa (ii), augmentée de 2 000 $ et du rajustement annuel calculé en conformité avec le paragraphe 25(1),
(iv) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2003 au 31 mars 2004, la somme versée pour la période visée au sous-alinéa (iii), augmentée de 2 000 $ et du rajustement annuel calculé en conformité avec le paragraphe 25(1).
15. Les juges de la Cour d’appel et de la Cour du Banc de la Reine du Nouveau-Brunswick reçoivent les traitements annuels suivants :
a) s’agissant du juge en chef du Nouveau-Brunswick :
(i) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2000 au 31 mars 2001, 217 100 $,
(ii) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2001 au 31 mars 2002, la somme qui fait en sorte que le rapport entre le traitement du juge en chef et celui, pour la même période, d’un juge visé à l’alinéa b) reste le même qu’entre 217 100 $ et 198 000 $,
(iii) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2002 au 31 mars 2003, la somme qui fait en sorte que le rapport entre le traitement du juge en chef et celui, pour la même période, d’un juge visé à l’alinéa b) reste le même qu’entre 217 100 $ et 198 000 $,
(iv) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2003 au 31 mars 2004, la somme qui fait en sorte que le rapport entre le traitement du juge en chef et celui, pour la même période, d’un juge visé à l’alinéa b) reste le même qu’entre 217 100 $ et 198 000 $;
b) s’agissant de chacun des cinq autres juges de la Cour d’appel :
(i) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2000 au 31 mars 2001, 198 000 $,
(ii) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2001 au 31 mars 2002, 200 000 $, augmenté du rajustement annuel calculé en conformité avec le paragraphe 25(1),
(iii) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2002 au 31 mars 2003, la somme versée pour la période visée au sous-alinéa (ii), augmentée de 2 000 $ et du rajustement annuel calculé en conformité avec le paragraphe 25(1),
(iv) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2003 au 31 mars 2004, la somme versée pour la période visée au sous-alinéa (iii), augmentée de 2 000 $ et du rajustement annuel calculé en conformité avec le paragraphe 25(1);
c) s’agissant du juge en chef de la Cour du Banc de la Reine :
(i) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2000 au 31 mars 2001, 217 100 $,
(ii) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2001 au 31 mars 2002, la somme qui fait en sorte que le rapport entre le traitement du juge en chef et celui, pour la même période, d’un juge visé à l’alinéa d) reste le même qu’entre 217 100 $ et 198 000 $,
(iii) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2002 au 31 mars 2003, la somme qui fait en sorte que le rapport entre le traitement du juge en chef et celui, pour la même période, d’un juge visé à l’alinéa d) reste le même qu’entre 217 100 $ et 198 000 $,
(iv) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2003 au 31 mars 2004, la somme qui fait en sorte que le rapport entre le traitement du juge en chef et celui, pour la même période, d’un juge visé à l’alinéa d) reste le même qu’entre 217 100 $ et 198 000 $;
d) s’agissant de chacun des vingt et un autres juges de la Cour du Banc de la Reine :
(i) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2000 au 31 mars 2001, 198 000 $,
(ii) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2001 au 31 mars 2002, 200 000 $, augmenté du rajustement annuel calculé en conformité avec le paragraphe 25(1),
(iii) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2002 au 31 mars 2003, la somme versée pour la période visée au sous-alinéa (ii), augmentée de 2 000 $ et du rajustement annuel calculé en conformité avec le paragraphe 25(1),
(iv) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2003 au 31 mars 2004, la somme versée pour la période visée au sous-alinéa (iii), augmentée de 2 000 $ et du rajustement annuel calculé en conformité avec le paragraphe 25(1).
16. Les juges de la Cour d’appel et de la Cour du Banc de la Reine du Manitoba reçoivent les traitements annuels suivants :
a) s’agissant du juge en chef du Manitoba :
(i) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2000 au 31 mars 2001, 217 100 $,
(ii) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2001 au 31 mars 2002, la somme qui fait en sorte que le rapport entre le traitement du juge en chef et celui, pour la même période, d’un juge visé à l’alinéa b) reste le même qu’entre 217 100 $ et 198 000 $,
(iii) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2002 au 31 mars 2003, la somme qui fait en sorte que le rapport entre le traitement du juge en chef et celui, pour la même période, d’un juge visé à l’alinéa b) reste le même qu’entre 217 100 $ et 198 000 $,
(iv) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2003 au 31 mars 2004, la somme qui fait en sorte que le rapport entre le traitement du juge en chef et celui, pour la même période, d’un juge visé à l’alinéa b) reste le même qu’entre 217 100 $ et 198 000 $;
b) s’agissant de chacun des six autres juges d’appel :
(i) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2000 au 31 mars 2001, 198 000 $,
(ii) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2001 au 31 mars 2002, 200 000 $, augmenté du rajustement annuel calculé en conformité avec le paragraphe 25(1),
(iii) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2002 au 31 mars 2003, la somme versée pour la période visée au sous-alinéa (ii), augmentée de 2 000 $ et du rajustement annuel calculé en conformité avec le paragraphe 25(1),
(iv) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2003 au 31 mars 2004, la somme versée pour la période visée au sous-alinéa (iii), augmentée de 2 000 $ et du rajustement annuel calculé en conformité avec le paragraphe 25(1);
c) s’agissant du juge en chef, du juge en chef associé et du juge en chef adjoint de la Cour du Banc de la Reine :
(i) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2000 au 31 mars 2001, 217 100 $,
(ii) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2001 au 31 mars 2002, la somme qui fait en sorte que le rapport entre leur traitement respectif et celui, pour la même période, d’un juge visé à l’alinéa d) reste le même qu’entre 217 100 $ et 198 000 $,
(iii) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2002 au 31 mars 2003, la somme qui fait en sorte que le rapport entre leur traitement respectif et celui, pour la même période, d’un juge visé à l’alinéa d) reste le même qu’entre 217 100 $ et 198 000 $,
(iv) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2003 au 31 mars 2004, la somme qui fait en sorte que le rapport entre leur traitement respectif et celui, pour la même période, d’un juge visé à l’alinéa d) reste le même qu’entre 217 100 $ et 198 000 $;
d) s’agissant de chacun des trente autres juges de la Cour du Banc de la Reine :
(i) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2000 au 31 mars 2001, 198 000 $,
(ii) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2001 au 31 mars 2002, 200 000 $, augmenté du rajustement annuel calculé en conformité avec le paragraphe 25(1),
(iii) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2002 au 31 mars 2003, la somme versée pour la période visée au sous-alinéa (ii), augmentée de 2 000 $ et du rajustement annuel calculé en conformité avec le paragraphe 25(1),
(iv) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2003 au 31 mars 2004, la somme versée pour la période visée au sous-alinéa (iii), augmentée de 2 000 $ et du rajustement annuel calculé en conformité avec le paragraphe 25(1).
17. Les juges de la Cour d’appel et de la Cour suprême de la Colombie-Britannique reçoivent les traitements annuels suivants :
a) s’agissant du juge en chef de la Colombie-Britannique :
(i) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2000 au 31 mars 2001, 217 100 $,
(ii) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2001 au 31 mars 2002, la somme qui fait en sorte que le rapport entre le traitement du juge en chef et celui, pour la même période, d’un juge visé à l’alinéa b) reste le même qu’entre 217 100 $ et 198 000 $,
(iii) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2002 au 31 mars 2003, la somme qui fait en sorte que le rapport entre le traitement du juge en chef et celui, pour la même période, d’un juge visé à l’alinéa b) reste le même qu’entre 217 100 $ et 198 000 $,
(iv) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2003 au 31 mars 2004, la somme qui fait en sorte que le rapport entre le traitement du juge en chef et celui, pour la même période, d’un juge visé à l’alinéa b) reste le même qu’entre 217 100 $ et 198 000 $;
b) s’agissant de chacun des douze autres juges d’appel :
(i) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2000 au 31 mars 2001, 198 000 $,
(ii) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2001 au 31 mars 2002, 200 000 $, augmenté du rajustement annuel calculé en conformité avec le paragraphe 25(1),
(iii) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2002 au 31 mars 2003, la somme versée pour la période visée au sous-alinéa (ii), augmentée de 2 000 $ et du rajustement annuel calculé en conformité avec le paragraphe 25(1),
(iv) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2003 au 31 mars 2004, la somme versée pour la période visée au sous-alinéa (iii), augmentée de 2 000 $ et du rajustement annuel calculé en conformité avec le paragraphe 25(1);
c) s’agissant du juge en chef de la Cour suprême :
(i) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2000 au 31 mars 2001, 217 100 $,
(ii) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2001 au 31 mars 2002, la somme qui fait en sorte que le rapport entre le traitement du juge en chef et celui, pour la même période, d’un juge visé à l’alinéa d) reste le même qu’entre 217 100 $ et 198 000 $,
(iii) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2002 au 31 mars 2003, la somme qui fait en sorte que le rapport entre le traitement du juge en chef et celui, pour la même période, d’un juge visé à l’alinéa d) reste le même qu’entre 217 100 $ et 198 000 $,
(iv) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2003 au 31 mars 2004, la somme qui fait en sorte que le rapport entre le traitement du juge en chef et celui, pour la même période, d’un juge visé à l’alinéa d) reste le même qu’entre 217 100 $ et 198 000 $;
c.1) s’agissant du juge en chef adjoint de la Cour suprême :
(i) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2000 au 31 mars 2001, 217 100 $,
(ii) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2001 au 31 mars 2002, la somme qui fait en sorte que le rapport entre le traitement du juge en chef adjoint et celui, pour la même période, d’un juge visé à l’alinéa d) reste le même qu’entre 217 100 $ et 198 000 $,
(iii) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2002 au 31 mars 2003, la somme qui fait en sorte que le rapport entre le traitement du juge en chef adjoint et celui, pour la même période, d’un juge visé à l’alinéa d) reste le même qu’entre 217 100 $ et 198 000 $,
(iv) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2003 au 31 mars 2004, la somme qui fait en sorte que le rapport entre le traitement du juge en chef adjoint et celui, pour la même période, d’un juge visé à l’alinéa d) reste le même qu’entre 217 100 $ et 198 000 $;
d) s’agissant de chacun des quatre-vingt-un autres juges de la Cour suprême :
(i) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2000 au 31 mars 2001, 198 000 $,
(ii) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2001 au 31 mars 2002, 200 000 $, augmenté du rajustement annuel calculé en conformité avec le paragraphe 25(1),
(iii) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2002 au 31 mars 2003, la somme versée pour la période visée au sous-alinéa (ii), augmentée de 2 000 $ et du rajustement annuel calculé en conformité avec le paragraphe 25(1),
(iv) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2003 au 31 mars 2004, la somme versée pour la période visée au sous-alinéa (iii), augmentée de 2 000 $ et du rajustement annuel calculé en conformité avec le paragraphe 25(1).
18. Les juges de la Cour suprême de l’Île-du-Prince-Édouard reçoivent les traitements annuels suivants :
a) s’agissant du juge en chef de l’Île-du-Prince-Édouard :
(i) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2000 au 31 mars 2001, 217 100 $,
(ii) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2001 au 31 mars 2002, la somme qui fait en sorte que le rapport entre le traitement du juge en chef et celui, pour la même période, d’un juge visé à l’alinéa b) reste le même qu’entre 217 100 $ et 198 000 $,
(iii) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2002 au 31 mars 2003, la somme qui fait en sorte que le rapport entre le traitement du juge en chef et celui, pour la même période, d’un juge visé à l’alinéa b) reste le même qu’entre 217 100 $ et 198 000 $,
(iv) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2003 au 31 mars 2004, la somme qui fait en sorte que le rapport entre le traitement du juge en chef et celui, pour la même période, d’un juge visé à l’alinéa b) reste le même qu’entre 217 100 $ et 198 000 $;
b) s’agissant de chacun des deux autres juges de la Section d’appel :
(i) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2000 au 31 mars 2001, 198 000 $,
(ii) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2001 au 31 mars 2002, 200 000 $, augmenté du rajustement annuel calculé en conformité avec le paragraphe 25(1),
(iii) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2002 au 31 mars 2003, la somme versée pour la période visée au sous-alinéa (ii), augmentée de 2 000 $ et du rajustement annuel calculé en conformité avec le paragraphe 25(1),
(iv) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2003 au 31 mars 2004, la somme versée pour la période visée au sous-alinéa (iii), augmentée de 2 000 $ et du rajustement annuel calculé en conformité avec le paragraphe 25(1);
c) s’agissant du juge en chef de la Section de première instance :
(i) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2000 au 31 mars 2001, 217 100 $,
(ii) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2001 au 31 mars 2002, la somme qui fait en sorte que le rapport entre le traitement du juge en chef et celui, pour la même période, d’un juge visé à l’alinéa d) reste le même qu’entre 217 100 $ et 198 000 $,
(iii) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2002 au 31 mars 2003, la somme qui fait en sorte que le rapport entre le traitement du juge en chef et celui, pour la même période, d’un juge visé à l’alinéa d) reste le même qu’entre 217 100 $ et 198 000 $,
(iv) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2003 au 31 mars 2004, la somme qui fait en sorte que le rapport entre le traitement du juge en chef et celui, pour la même période, d’un juge visé à l’alinéa d) reste le même qu’entre 217 100 $ et 198 000 $;
d) s’agissant de chacun des trois autres juges de la Section de première instance :
(i) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2000 au 31 mars 2001, 198 000 $,
(ii) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2001 au 31 mars 2002, 200 000 $, augmenté du rajustement annuel calculé en conformité avec le paragraphe 25(1),
(iii) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2002 au 31 mars 2003, la somme versée pour la période visée au sous-alinéa (ii), augmentée de 2 000 $ et du rajustement annuel calculé en conformité avec le paragraphe 25(1),
(iv) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2003 au 31 mars 2004, la somme versée pour la période visée au sous-alinéa (iii), augmentée de 2 000 $ et du rajustement annuel calculé en conformité avec le paragraphe 25(1).
19. Les juges de la Cour d’appel et de la Cour du Banc de la Reine de la Saskatchewan reçoivent les traitements annuels suivants :
a) s’agissant du juge en chef de la Saskatchewan :
(i) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2000 au 31 mars 2001, 217 100 $,
(ii) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2001 au 31 mars 2002, la somme qui fait en sorte que le rapport entre le traitement du juge en chef et celui, pour la même période, d’un juge visé à l’alinéa b) reste le même qu’entre 217 100 $ et 198 000 $,
(iii) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2002 au 31 mars 2003, la somme qui fait en sorte que le rapport entre le traitement du juge en chef et celui, pour la même période, d’un juge visé à l’alinéa b) reste le même qu’entre 217 100 $ et 198 000 $,
(iv) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2003 au 31 mars 2004, la somme qui fait en sorte que le rapport entre le traitement du juge en chef et celui, pour la même période, d’un juge visé à l’alinéa b) reste le même qu’entre 217 100 $ et 198 000 $;
b) s’agissant de chacun des six autres juges d’appel :
(i) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2000 au 31 mars 2001, 198 000 $,
(ii) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2001 au 31 mars 2002, 200 000 $, augmenté du rajustement annuel calculé en conformité avec le paragraphe 25(1),
(iii) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2002 au 31 mars 2003, la somme versée pour la période visée au sous-alinéa (ii), augmentée de 2 000 $ et du rajustement annuel calculé en conformité avec le paragraphe 25(1),
(iv) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2003 au 31 mars 2004, la somme versée pour la période visée au sous-alinéa (iii), augmentée de 2 000 $ et du rajustement annuel calculé en conformité avec le paragraphe 25(1);
c) s’agissant du juge en chef de la Cour du Banc de la Reine :
(i) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2000 au 31 mars 2001, 217 100 $,
(ii) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2001 au 31 mars 2002, la somme qui fait en sorte que le rapport entre le traitement du juge en chef et celui, pour la même période, d’un juge visé à l’alinéa d) reste le même qu’entre 217 100 $ et 198 000 $,
(iii) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2002 au 31 mars 2003, la somme qui fait en sorte que le rapport entre le traitement du juge en chef et celui, pour la même période, d’un juge visé à l’alinéa d) reste le même qu’entre 217 100 $ et 198 000 $,
(iv) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2003 au 31 mars 2004, la somme qui fait en sorte que le rapport entre le traitement du juge en chef et celui, pour la même période, d’un juge visé à l’alinéa d) reste le même qu’entre 217 100 $ et 198 000 $;
d) s’agissant de chacun des vingt-neuf autres juges de la Cour du Banc de la Reine :
(i) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2000 au 31 mars 2001, 198 000 $,
(ii) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2001 au 31 mars 2002, 200 000 $, augmenté du rajustement annuel calculé en conformité avec le paragraphe 25(1),
(iii) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2002 au 31 mars 2003, la somme versée pour la période visée au sous-alinéa (ii), augmentée de 2 000 $ et du rajustement annuel calculé en conformité avec le paragraphe 25(1),
(iv) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2003 au 31 mars 2004, la somme versée pour la période visée au sous-alinéa (iii), augmentée de 2 000 $ et du rajustement annuel calculé en conformité avec le paragraphe 25(1).
20. Les juges de la Cour d’appel et de la Cour du Banc de la Reine de l’Alberta reçoivent les traitements annuels suivants :
a) s’agissant du juge en chef de l’Alberta :
(i) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2000 au 31 mars 2001, 217 100 $,
(ii) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2001 au 31 mars 2002, la somme qui fait en sorte que le rapport entre le traitement du juge en chef et celui, pour la même période, d’un juge visé à l’alinéa b) reste le même qu’entre 217 100 $ et 198 000 $,
(iii) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2002 au 31 mars 2003, la somme qui fait en sorte que le rapport entre le traitement du juge en chef et celui, pour la même période, d’un juge visé à l’alinéa b) reste le même qu’entre 217 100 $ et 198 000 $,
(iv) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2003 au 31 mars 2004, la somme qui fait en sorte que le rapport entre le traitement du juge en chef et celui, pour la même période, d’un juge visé à l’alinéa b) reste le même qu’entre 217 100 $ et 198 000 $;
b) s’agissant de chacun des dix autres juges d’appel :
(i) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2000 au 31 mars 2001, 198 000 $,
(ii) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2001 au 31 mars 2002, 200 000 $, augmenté du rajustement annuel calculé en conformité avec le paragraphe 25(1),
(iii) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2002 au 31 mars 2003, la somme versée pour la période visée au sous-alinéa (ii), augmentée de 2 000 $ et du rajustement annuel calculé en conformité avec le paragraphe 25(1),
(iv) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2003 au 31 mars 2004, la somme versée pour la période visée au sous-alinéa (iii), augmentée de 2 000 $ et du rajustement annuel calculé en conformité avec le paragraphe 25(1);
c) s’agissant du juge en chef et du juge en chef adjoint de la Cour du Banc de la Reine :
(i) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2000 au 31 mars 2001, 217 100 $,
(ii) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2001 au 31 mars 2002, la somme qui fait en sorte que le rapport entre leur traitement respectif et celui, pour la même période, d’un juge visé à l’alinéa d) reste le même qu’entre 217 100 $ et 198 000 $,
(iii) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2002 au 31 mars 2003, la somme qui fait en sorte que le rapport entre leur traitement respectif et celui, pour la même période, d’un juge visé à l’alinéa d) reste le même qu’entre 217 100 $ et 198 000 $,
(iv) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2003 au 31 mars 2004, la somme qui fait en sorte que le rapport entre leur traitement respectif et celui, pour la même période, d’un juge visé à l’alinéa d) reste le même qu’entre 217 100 $ et 198 000 $;
d) s’agissant de chacun des cinquante-cinq autres juges de la Cour du Banc de la Reine :
(i) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2000 au 31 mars 2001, 198 000 $,
(ii) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2001 au 31 mars 2002, 200 000 $, augmenté du rajustement annuel calculé en conformité avec le paragraphe 25(1),
(iii) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2002 au 31 mars 2003, la somme versée pour la période visée au sous-alinéa (ii), augmentée de 2 000 $ et du rajustement annuel calculé en conformité avec le paragraphe 25(1),
(iv) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2003 au 31 mars 2004, la somme versée pour la période visée au sous-alinéa (iii), augmentée de 2 000 $ et du rajustement annuel calculé en conformité avec le paragraphe 25(1).
21. Les juges de la Cour suprême de Terre-Neuve reçoivent les traitements annuels suivants :
a) s’agissant du juge en chef de Terre-Neuve :
(i) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2000 au 31 mars 2001, 217 100 $,
(ii) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2001 au 31 mars 2002, la somme qui fait en sorte que le rapport entre le traitement du juge en chef et celui, pour la même période, d’un juge visé à l’alinéa b) reste le même qu’entre 217 100 $ et 198 000 $,
(iii) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2002 au 31 mars 2003, la somme qui fait en sorte que le rapport entre le traitement du juge en chef et celui, pour la même période, d’un juge visé à l’alinéa b) reste le même qu’entre 217 100 $ et 198 000 $,
(iv) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2003 au 31 mars 2004, la somme qui fait en sorte que le rapport entre le traitement du juge en chef et celui, pour la même période, d’un juge visé à l’alinéa b) reste le même qu’entre 217 100 $ et 198 000 $;
b) s’agissant de chacun des cinq autres juges d’appel :
(i) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2000 au 31 mars 2001, 198 000 $,
(ii) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2001 au 31 mars 2002, 200 000 $, augmenté du rajustement annuel calculé en conformité avec le paragraphe 25(1),
(iii) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2002 au 31 mars 2003, la somme versée pour la période visée au sous-alinéa (ii), augmentée de 2 000 $ et du rajustement annuel calculé en conformité avec le paragraphe 25(1),
(iv) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2003 au 31 mars 2004, la somme versée pour la période visée au sous-alinéa (iii), augmentée de 2 000 $ et du rajustement annuel calculé en conformité avec le paragraphe 25(1);
c) s’agissant du juge en chef de la Section de première instance :
(i) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2000 au 31 mars 2001, 217 100 $,
(ii) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2001 au 31 mars 2002, la somme qui fait en sorte que le rapport entre le traitement du juge en chef et celui, pour la même période, d’un juge visé à l’alinéa d) reste le même qu’entre 217 100 $ et 198 000 $,
(iii) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2002 au 31 mars 2003, la somme qui fait en sorte que le rapport entre le traitement du juge en chef et celui, pour la même période, d’un juge visé à l’alinéa d) reste le même qu’entre 217 100 $ et 198 000 $,
(iv) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2003 au 31 mars 2004, la somme qui fait en sorte que le rapport entre le traitement du juge en chef et celui, pour la même période, d’un juge visé à l’alinéa d) reste le même qu’entre 217 100 $ et 198 000 $;
d) s’agissant de chacun des dix-huit autres juges de la Section de première instance :
(i) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2000 au 31 mars 2001, 198 000 $,
(ii) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2001 au 31 mars 2002, 200 000 $, augmenté du rajustement annuel calculé en conformité avec le paragraphe 25(1),
(iii) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2002 au 31 mars 2003, la somme versée pour la période visée au sous-alinéa (ii), augmentée de 2 000 $ et du rajustement annuel calculé en conformité avec le paragraphe 25(1),
(iv) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2003 au 31 mars 2004, la somme versée pour la période visée au sous-alinéa (iii), augmentée de 2 000 $ et du rajustement annuel calculé en conformité avec le paragraphe 25(1).
Supreme Court of Canada
9. The yearly salaries of the judges of the Supreme Court of Canada are as follows:
(a) the Chief Justice of Canada, $308,400; and
(b) the eight puisne judges, $285,600 each.
Federal Courts
10. The yearly salaries of the judges of the Federal Courts are as follows:
(a) the Chief Justice of the Federal Court of Appeal, $263,000;
(b) the other judges of the Federal Court of Appeal, $240,000 each;
(c) the Chief Justice of the Federal Court, $263,000; and
(d) the other judges of the Federal Court, $240,000 each.
Tax Court of Canada
11. The yearly salaries of the judges of the Tax Court of Canada are as follows:
(a) the Chief Justice, $263,000;
(b) the Associate Chief Justice, $263,000; and
(c) the other judges, $240,000 each.
Court of Appeal for Ontario and Superior Court of Justice
12. The yearly salaries of the judges of the Court of Appeal for Ontario and of the Superior Court of Justice in and for the Province of Ontario are as follows:
(a) the Chief Justice and the Associate Chief Justice of Ontario, $263,000 each;
(b) the fourteen Justices of Appeal, $240,000 each;
(c) the Chief Justice and the Associate Chief Justice of the Superior Court of Justice, $263,000 each; and
(d) the one hundred and ninety-two other judges of the Superior Court of Justice, $240,000 each.
Court of Appeal and Superior Court of Quebec
13. The yearly salaries of the judges of the Court of Appeal and of the Superior Court in and for the Province of Quebec are as follows:
(a) the Chief Justice of Quebec, $263,000;
(b) the eighteen puisne judges of the Court of Appeal, $240,000 each;
(c) the Chief Justice, the Senior Associate Chief Justice and the Associate Chief Justice of the Superior Court, $263,000 each; and
(d) the one hundred and forty puisne judges of the Superior Court, $240,000 each.
Court of Appeal and Supreme Court of Nova Scotia
14. The yearly salaries of the judges of the Nova Scotia Court of Appeal and the Supreme Court of Nova Scotia are as follows:
(a) the Chief Justice of Nova Scotia, $263,000;
(b) the seven other judges of the Court of Appeal, $240,000 each;
(c) the Chief Justice and the Associate Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, $263,000 each; and
(d) the twenty-three other judges of the Supreme Court, $240,000 each.
Court of Appeal and Court of Queen’s Bench of New Brunswick
15. The yearly salaries of the judges of the Court of Appeal of New Brunswick and of the Court of Queen’s Bench of New Brunswick are as follows:
(a) the Chief Justice of New Brunswick, $263,000;
(b) the five other judges of the Court of Appeal, $240,000 each;
(c) the Chief Justice of the Court of Queen’s Bench, $263,000; and
(d) the twenty-one other judges of the Court of Queen’s Bench, $240,000 each.
Court of Appeal and Court of Queen’s Bench for Manitoba
16. The yearly salaries of the judges of the Court of Appeal for Manitoba and of Her Majesty’s Court of Queen’s Bench for Manitoba are as follows:
(a) the Chief Justice of Manitoba, $263,000;
(b) the six Judges of Appeal, $240,000 each;
(c) the Chief Justice, the Senior Associate Chief Justice and the Associate Chief Justice of the Court of Queen’s Bench, $263,000 each; and
(d) the thirty puisne judges of the Court of Queen’s Bench, $240,000 each.
Court of Appeal and Supreme Court of British Columbia
17. The yearly salaries of the judges of the Court of Appeal for British Columbia and of the Supreme Court of British Columbia are as follows:
(a) the Chief Justice of British Columbia, $263,000;
(b) the twelve Justices of Appeal, $240,000 each;
(c) the Chief Justice and the Associate Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, $263,000 each; and
(d) the eighty-one other judges of the Supreme Court, $240,000 each.
Supreme Court of Prince Edward Island
18. The yearly salaries of the judges of the Supreme Court of Prince Edward Island are as follows:
(a) the Chief Justice of Prince Edward Island, $263,000;
(b) the two other judges of the Appeal Division, $240,000 each;
(c) the Chief Justice of the Trial Division, $263,000; and
(d) the three other judges of the Trial Division, $240,000 each.
Court of Appeal and Court of Queen’s Bench for Saskatchewan
19. The yearly salaries of the judges of the Court of Appeal for Saskatchewan and of Her Majesty’s Court of Queen’s Bench for Saskatchewan are as follows:
(a) the Chief Justice of Saskatchewan $263,000;
(b) the six Judges of Appeal, $240,000 each;
(c) the Chief Justice of the Court of Queen’s Bench, $263,000; and
(d) the twenty-nine other judges of the Court of Queen’s Bench, $240,000 each.
Court of Appeal and Court of Queen’s Bench of Alberta
20. The yearly salaries of the judges of the Court of Appeal of Alberta and of the Court of Queen’s Bench of Alberta are as follows:
(a) the Chief Justice of Alberta, $263,000;
(b) the ten Justices of Appeal, $240,000 each;
(c) the Chief Justice and the Associate Chief Justice of the Court of Queen’s Bench, $263,000 each; and
(d) the fifty-five other Justices of the Court of Queen’s Bench, $240,000 each.
Supreme Court of Newfound­land and Labrador
21. The yearly salaries of the judges of the Supreme Court of Newfoundland and Labrador are as follows:
(a) the Chief Justice of Newfoundland and Labrador, $263,000;
(b) the five Judges of Appeal, $240,000 each;
(c) the Chief Justice of the Trial Division, $263,000; and
(d) the eighteen other judges of the Trial Division, $240,000 each.
1999, c. 3, s. 72; 2001, c. 7, s. 14; 2002, c. 7, s. 189
3. (1) Subsections 22(1) to (2.1) of the Act are replaced by the following:
Clause 3: (1) Existing text of subsections 22(1) to (2.1):
22. (1) The yearly salaries of the judges of the Supreme Court of the Yukon Territory are as follows:
(a) The senior judge
(i) for the period beginning April 1, 2000 and ending March 31, 2001, $198,000,
(ii) for the period beginning April 1, 2001 and ending March 31, 2002, $200,000, plus the annual adjustment calculated under subsection 25(1),
(iii) for the period beginning April 1, 2002 and ending March 31, 2003, the amount received for the period referred to in subparagraph (ii), plus $2,000 and the annual adjustment calculated under subsection 25(1), and
(iv) for the period beginning April 1, 2003 and ending March 31, 2004, the amount received for the period referred to in subparagraph (iii), plus $2,000 and the annual adjustment calculated under subsection 25(1); and
(b) The other judge
(i) for the period beginning April 1, 2000 and ending March 31, 2001, $198,000,
(ii) for the period beginning April 1, 2001 and ending March 31, 2002, $200,000, plus the annual adjustment calculated under subsection 25(1),
(iii) for the period beginning April 1, 2002 and ending March 31, 2003, the amount received for the period referred to in subparagraph (ii), plus $2,000 and the annual adjustment calculated under subsection 25(1), and
(iv) for the period beginning April 1, 2003 and ending March 31, 2004, the amount received for the period referred to in subparagraph (iii), plus $2,000 and the annual adjustment calculated under subsection 25(1).
(2) The yearly salaries of the judges of the Supreme Court of the Northwest Territories are as follows:
(a) The senior judge
(i) for the period beginning April 1, 2000 and ending March 31, 2001, $198,000,
(ii) for the period beginning April 1, 2001 and ending March 31, 2002, $200,000, plus the annual adjustment calculated under subsection 25(1),
(iii) for the period beginning April 1, 2002 and ending March 31, 2003, the amount received for the period referred to in subparagraph (ii), plus $2,000 and the annual adjustment calculated under subsection 25(1), and
(iv) for the period beginning April 1, 2003 and ending March 31, 2004, the amount received for the period referred to in subparagraph (iii), plus $2,000 and the annual adjustment calculated under subsection 25(1); and
(b) The two other judges, each
(i) for the period beginning April 1, 2000 and ending March 31, 2001, $198,000,
(ii) for the period beginning April 1, 2001 and ending March 31, 2002, $200,000, plus the annual adjustment calculated under subsection 25(1),
(iii) for the period beginning April 1, 2002 and ending March 31, 2003, the amount received for the period referred to in subparagraph (ii), plus $2,000 and the annual adjustment calculated under subsection 25(1), and
(iv) for the period beginning April 1, 2003 and ending March 31, 2004, the amount received for the period referred to in subparagraph (iii), plus $2,000 and the annual adjustment calculated under subsection 25(1).
(2.1) The yearly salaries of the judges of the Nunavut Court of Justice are as follows:
(a) The senior judge
(i) for the period beginning April 1, 2000 and ending March 31, 2001, $198,000,
(ii) for the period beginning April 1, 2001 and ending March 31, 2002, $200,000, plus the annual adjustment calculated under subsection 25(1),
(iii) for the period beginning April 1, 2002 and ending March 31, 2003, the amount received for the period referred to in subparagraph (ii), plus $2,000 and the annual adjustment calculated under subsection 25(1), and
(iv) for the period beginning April 1, 2003 and ending March 31, 2004, the amount received for the period referred to in subparagraph (iii), plus $2,000 and the annual adjustment calculated under subsection 25(1); and
(b) The two other judges, each
(i) for the period beginning April 1, 2000 and ending March 31, 2001, $198,000,
(ii) for the period beginning April 1, 2001 and ending March 31, 2002, $200,000, plus the annual adjustment calculated under subsection 25(1),
(iii) for the period beginning April 1, 2002 and ending March 31, 2003, the amount received for the period referred to in subparagraph (ii), plus $2,000 and the annual adjustment calculated under subsection 25(1), and
(iv) for the period beginning April 1, 2003 and ending March 31, 2004, the amount received for the period referred to in subparagraph (iii), plus $2,000 and the annual adjustment calculated under subsection 25(1).
Article 3 : (1) Texte des paragraphes 22(1) à (2.1) :
22. (1) Les juges de la Cour suprême du territoire du Yukon reçoivent les traitements annuels suivants :
a) s’agissant du juge principal :
(i) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2000 au 31 mars 2001, 198 000 $,
(ii) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2001 au 31 mars 2002, 200 000 $, augmenté du rajustement annuel calculé en conformité avec le paragraphe 25(1),
(iii) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2002 au 31 mars 2003, la somme versée pour la période visée au sous-alinéa (ii), augmentée de 2 000 $ et du rajustement annuel calculé en conformité avec le paragraphe 25(1),
(iv) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2003 au 31 mars 2004, la somme versée pour la période visée au sous-alinéa (iii), augmentée de 2 000 $ et du rajustement annuel calculé en conformité avec le paragraphe 25(1);
b) s’agissant de l’autre juge :
(i) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2000 au 31 mars 2001, 198 000 $,
(ii) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2001 au 31 mars 2002, 200 000 $, augmenté du rajustement annuel calculé en conformité avec le paragraphe 25(1),
(iii) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2002 au 31 mars 2003, la somme versée pour la période visée au sous-alinéa (ii), augmentée de 2 000 $ et du rajustement annuel calculé en conformité avec le paragraphe 25(1),
(iv) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2003 au 31 mars 2004, la somme versée pour la période visée au sous-alinéa (iii), augmentée de 2 000 $ et du rajustement annuel calculé en conformité avec le paragraphe 25(1).
(2) Les juges de la Cour suprême des Territoires du Nord-Ouest reçoivent les traitements annuels suivants :
a) s’agissant du juge principal :
(i) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2000 au 31 mars 2001, 198 000 $,
(ii) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2001 au 31 mars 2002, 200 000 $, augmenté du rajustement annuel calculé en conformité avec le paragraphe 25(1),
(iii) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2002 au 31 mars 2003, la somme versée pour la période visée au sous-alinéa (ii), augmentée de 2 000 $ et du rajustement annuel calculé en conformité avec le paragraphe 25(1),
(iv) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2003 au 31 mars 2004, la somme versée pour la période visée au sous-alinéa (iii), augmentée de 2 000 $ et du rajustement annuel calculé en conformité avec le paragraphe 25(1);
b) s’agissant de chacun des deux autres juges :
(i) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2000 au 31 mars 2001, 198 000 $,
(ii) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2001 au 31 mars 2002, 200 000 $, augmenté du rajustement annuel calculé en conformité avec le paragraphe 25(1),
(iii) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2002 au 31 mars 2003, la somme versée pour la période visée au sous-alinéa (ii), augmentée de 2 000 $ et du rajustement annuel calculé en conformité avec le paragraphe 25(1),
(iv) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2003 au 31 mars 2004, la somme versée pour la période visée au sous-alinéa (iii), augmentée de 2 000 $ et du rajustement annuel calculé en conformité avec le paragraphe 25(1).
(2.1) Les juges de la Cour de justice du Nunavut reçoivent les traitements annuels suivants :
a) s’agissant du juge principal :
(i) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2000 au 31 mars 2001, 198 000 $,
(ii) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2001 au 31 mars 2002, 200 000 $, augmenté du rajustement annuel calculé en conformité avec le paragraphe 25(1),
(iii) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2002 au 31 mars 2003, la somme versée pour la période visée au sous-alinéa (ii), augmentée de 2 000 $ et du rajustement annuel calculé en conformité avec le paragraphe 25(1),
(iv) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2003 au 31 mars 2004, la somme versée pour la période visée au sous-alinéa (iii), augmentée de 2 000 $ et du rajustement annuel calculé en conformité avec le paragraphe 25(1);
b) s’agissant de chacun des deux autres juges :
(i) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2000 au 31 mars 2001, 198 000 $,
(ii) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2001 au 31 mars 2002, 200 000 $, augmenté du rajustement annuel calculé en conformité avec le paragraphe 25(1),
(iii) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2002 au 31 mars 2003, la somme versée pour la période visée au sous-alinéa (ii), augmentée de 2 000 $ et du rajustement annuel calculé en conformité avec le paragraphe 25(1),
(iv) pour la période allant du 1er avril 2003 au 31 mars 2004, la somme versée pour la période visée au sous-alinéa (iii), augmentée de 2 000 $ et du rajustement annuel calculé en conformité avec le paragraphe 25(1).
Supreme Court of Yukon
22. (1) The yearly salaries of the judges of the Supreme Court of Yukon are as follows:
(a) the senior judge, $263,000; and
(b) the two other judges, $240,000 each.
Supreme Court of the Northwest Territories
(2) The yearly salaries of the judges of the Supreme Court of the Northwest Territories are as follows:
(a) the senior judge, $263,000; and
(b) the two other judges, $240,000 each.
Nunavut Court of Justice
(2.1) The yearly salaries of the judges of the Nunavut Court of Justice are as follows:
(a) the senior judge, $263,000; and
(b) the two other judges, $240,000 each.
(2) Paragraph 22(1)(a) of the Act, as enacted by subsection (1), is replaced by the following:
(a) the Chief Justice, $263,000; and
(3) Paragraph 22(2)(a) of the Act, as enacted by subsection (1), is replaced by the following:
(a) the Chief Justice, $263,000; and
(4) Paragraph 22(2.1)(a) of the Act, as enacted by subsection (1), is replaced by the following:
(a) the Chief Justice, $263,000; and
1999, c. 3, s. 72
(5) Subsection 22(3) of the Act is repealed.
(5) Existing text of subsection 22(3):
(3) In this section, “senior judge” means the judge with the earlier date of appointment to the court in question or, in the case of more than one judge appointed on the same day, the judge that the Governor in Council may designate as the senior judge.
(5) Texte du paragraphe 22(3) :
(3) Au présent article, « juge principal » s’entend du juge le plus ancien dans sa charge au tribunal ou, si plusieurs juges sont nommés le même jour, de celui que le gouverneur en conseil peut désigner.
1992, c. 51, s. 7(2)
4. (1) Paragraph 24(3)(b) of the Act is replaced by the following:
Clause 4: (1) Relevant portion of subsection 24(3):
(3) Subject to subsection (4), the number of salaries that may be paid pursuant to this section at any one time shall not be greater than
... 
(b) thirty, in the case of judges appointed to superior courts in the provinces other than appeal courts.
Article 4 : (1) Texte du passage visé du paragraphe 24(3) :
(3) Le nombre maximal de traitements supplémentaires qu’il est possible de verser, à quelque moment que ce soit, en application du présent article est, sauf cas prévu au paragraphe (4) :
[...] 
b) trente, pour les autres juridictions supérieures.
(b) thirty-two, in the case of judges appointed to superior courts in the provinces other than appeal courts.
1998, c. 30, s. 3(2)
(2) The portion of subsection 24(4) of the Act before paragraph (a) is replaced by the following:
(2) Relevant portion of subsection 24(4):
(4) For the purposes of assisting the establishment of unified family courts in the provinces, a further number of salaries not greater than thirty-six at any one time may be paid in the case of judges appointed to courts described in paragraph (3)(b)
(2) Texte du passage visé du paragraphe 24(4) :
(4) Afin de favoriser la constitution de tribunaux provinciaux de la famille, il peut être versé, à quelque moment que ce soit, un maximum de trente-six autres traitements aux juges nommés aux tribunaux visés à l’alinéa (3)b) :
Unified family courts
(4) For the purposes of assisting the establishment of unified family courts in the provinces, a further number of salaries not greater than sixty-three at any one time may be paid in the case of judges appointed to courts described in paragraph (3)(b)
1992, c. 51, s. 7(4)
(3) Paragraph 24(6)(a) of the Act is replaced by the following:
(3) Relevant portion of susection 24(6):
(6) In this section, “appeal court” means
(a) in relation to each of the Provinces of Ontario, Quebec, Nova Scotia, New Brunswick, Manitoba, British Columbia, Saskatchewan, Alberta and Newfoundland, the Court of Appeal of the Province; and
(3) Texte du passage visé du paragraphe 24(6) :
(6) Au présent article, « cour d’appel » s’entend :
a) pour les provinces d’Ontario, de Québec, de la Nouvelle-Écosse, du Nouveau-Brunswick, du Manitoba, de la Colombie-Britannique, de la Saskatchewan, d’Alberta et de Terre-Neuve, de la Cour d’appel;
(a) in relation to each of the Provinces of Ontario, Quebec, Nova Scotia, New Brunswick, Manitoba, British Columbia, Saskatchewan, Alberta and Newfoundland and Labrador, the Court of Appeal of the Province; and
2001, c. 7, s. 16
5. (1) Subsection 25(1) of the Act is replaced by the following:
Clause 5: (1) Existing text of subsection 25(1):
25. (1) For the twelve month periods commencing April 1, 2001, April 1, 2002 and April 1, 2003, the annual adjustment referred to in sections 9 to 22 shall be the amount obtained by multiplying
(a) the salary annexed to that office for the twelve month period immediately preceding the twelve month period in respect of which the salary is to be determined plus $2,000
by
(b) the percentage that the Industrial Aggregate for the first adjustment year is of the Industrial Aggregate for the second adjustment year less one hundred per cent, or seven per cent, whichever is less.
Article 5 : (1) Texte du paragraphe 25(1) :
25. (1) Dans le cas des rajustements annuels mentionnés aux articles 9 à 22, le rajustement annuel, pour les périodes de douze mois commençant le 1er avril 2001, le 1er avril 2002 et le 1er avril 2003, est égal au produit des facteurs suivants :
a) le traitement payable pour la période précédente, augmenté de 2 000 $;
b) le pourcentage — au maximum sept pour cent — que représente le rapport de l’indice de l’ensemble des activités économiques de la première année de rajustement sur celui de la seconde, moins cent pour cent.
Annual adjustment of salary
25. (1) The yearly salaries referred to in sections 9 to 22 apply in respect of the twelve month period commencing April 1, 2004.
2001, c. 7, s. 16
(2) The portion of subsection 25(2) of the Act before paragraph (a) is replaced by the following:
(2) Relevant portion of subsection 25(2):
(2) The salary annexed to an office of judge in sections 9 to 22 for the twelve month period commencing April 1, 2004, and for each subsequent twelve month period, shall be the amount obtained by multiplying
(2) Texte du passage visé du paragraphe 25(2) :
(2) Le traitement des juges visés aux articles 9 à 22, pour chaque période de douze mois commençant le 1er avril 2004, est égal au produit des facteurs suivants :
Annual adjustment of salary
(2) The salary annexed to an office of judge in sections 9 to 22 for the twelve month period commencing April 1, 2005, and for each subsequent twelve month period, shall be the amount obtained by multiplying
2001, c. 7, s. 16
(3) Paragraph 25(3)(a) of the Act is replaced by the following:
(3) Relevant portion of subsection 25(3):
(3) For the purposes of this section,
(a) in relation to any twelve month period in respect of which the annual adjustment or the salary is to be determined, the “first adjustment year” is the most recent twelve month period for which the Industrial Aggregate is available on the first day of the period in respect of which the annual adjustment or the salary is to be determined, and the “second adjustment year” is the twelve month period immediately preceding the first adjustment year; and
(3) Texte du passage visé du paragraphe 25(3) :
(3) Pour l’application du présent article :
a) aux fins du calcul du rajustement annuel ou du traitement à verser au cours d’une période donnée, la première année de rajustement correspond à la période de douze mois à laquelle s’applique l’indice de l’ensemble des activités économiques dont la publication est la plus récente au moment où s’effectue le calcul, la seconde année de rajustement étant la période de douze mois qui précède la première;
(a) in relation to any twelve month period in respect of which the salary is to be determined, the “first adjustment year” is the most recent twelve month period for which the Industrial Aggregate is available on the first day of the period in respect of which the salary is to be determined, and the “second adjustment year” is the twelve month period immediately preceding the first adjustment year; and
2001, c. 7, s. 18
6. Subsection 26.3(2) of the Act is replaced by the following:
Clause 6: Existing text of subsection 26.3(2):
(2) A representative of the judiciary identified under subsection (1) who participates in an inquiry of the Commission is entitled to be paid, out of the Consolidated Revenue Fund, one-half of the costs determined under subsection (3) in respect of his or her participation.
Article 6 : Texte du paragraphe 26.3(2) :
(2) Sous réserve du paragraphe (1), un représentant de la magistrature qui participe à une enquête de la Commission a droit au paiement sur le Trésor de la moitié des dépens liés à sa participation, déterminés en conformité avec le paragraphe (3).
Entitlement to payment of costs
(2) A representative of the judiciary identified under subsection (1) who participates in an inquiry of the Commission is entitled to be paid, out of the Consolidated Revenue Fund, two thirds of the costs determined under subsection (3) in respect of his or her participation.
2002, c. 7, s. 190(1)
7. (1) Subsection 27(2) of the Act is replaced by the following:
Clause 7: (1) Existing text of subsection 27(2):
(2) On and after April 1, 2000, there shall be paid to each judge of the Supreme Court of Yukon, the Supreme Court of the Northwest Territories and the Nunavut Court of Justice who is in receipt of a salary under this Act, in addition to the allowance provided by subsection (1), a non-accountable yearly allowance of $12,000 as compensation for the higher cost of living in the territories.
Article 7 : (1) Texte du paragraphe 27(2) :
(2) À compter du 1er avril 2000, les juges des cours suprêmes du territoire du Yukon et des Territoires du Nord-Ouest et de la Cour de justice du Nunavut rémunérés au titre de la présente loi reçoivent en outre, sans avoir à en rendre compte, une indemnité de vie chère de 12 000 $ par an pour les territoires.
Additional allowance for northern judges
(2) On and after April 1, 2004, there shall be paid to each judge of the Supreme Court of Newfoundland and Labrador resident in Labrador and each judge of the Supreme Court of Yukon, the Supreme Court of the Northwest Territories and the Nunavut Court of Justice who is in receipt of a salary under this Act, in addition to the allowance provided by subsection (1), a non-accountable yearly allowance of $12,000 as compensation for the higher cost of living in Labrador and in the territories.
2001, c. 7, s. 19(2); 2002, c. 7, ss. 190 and 277(E), c. 8, s. 86
(2) Subsections 27(6) and (7) of the Act are replaced by the following:
(2) Existing text of subsections 27(6) and (7):
(6) A chief justice or chief judge, a puisne judge of the Supreme Court of Canada, the Chief Justice of the Court of Appeal of the Yukon Territory, the Chief Justice of the Court of Appeal of the Northwest Territories, the Chief Justice of the Court of Appeal of Nunavut, the senior judge of the Supreme Court of the Yukon Territory, the senior judge of the Supreme Court of the Northwest Territories and the senior judge of the Nunavut Court of Justice are entitled to be paid, as a representational allowance, reasonable travel and other expenses actually incurred by the justice or judge or the spouse or common-law partner of the justice or judge in discharging the special extra-judicial obligations and responsibilities that devolve on the justice or judge, to the extent that those expenses may not be reimbursed under any other provision of this Act and their aggregate amount does not exceed in any year the maximum amount indicated in respect of each office in subsection (7).
(7) On and after April 1, 2000, the maximum yearly amounts of the representational allowance referred to in subsection (6) are as follows:
(a) The Chief Justice of Canada 
........
$18,750
(b) Each puisne judge of the Supreme Court of Canada 
........
$10,000
(c) The Chief Justice of the Federal Court and each chief justice described in sections 12 to 21 as the chief justice of a province 
........
$12,500
(d) Each other chief justice referred to in sections 10 and 12 to 21 
........
$10,000
(e) The senior judge of the Supreme Court of the Yukon Territory, the senior judge of the Supreme Court of the Northwest Territories and the senior judge of the Nunavut Court of Justice, each 
........
$10,000
(f) The Chief Judge of the Tax Court of Canada 
........
$10,000
(g) The Chief Justice of the Court of Appeal of the Yukon Territory, the Chief Justice of the Court of Appeal of the Northwest Territories and the Chief Justice of the Court of Appeal of Nunavut, each 
........
$10,000
(h) The Chief Justice of the Court Martial Appeal Court of Canada 
........
$10,000
(2) Texte des paragraphes 27(6) et (7) :
(6) Les juges en chef, les juges de la Cour suprême du Canada autres que le juge en chef, les juges en chef des cours d’appel du Yukon, des Territoires du Nord-Ouest et du territoire du Nunavut, ainsi que les juges principaux des cours suprêmes du Yukon et des Territoires du Nord-Ouest et celui de la Cour de justice du Nunavut, ont droit, à titre de frais de représentation et pour les dépenses de déplacement ou autres entraînées, pour eux ou leur époux ou conjoint de fait, par l’accomplissement de leurs fonctions extrajudiciaires et qui ne sont pas remboursables aux termes d’une autre disposition de la présente loi, aux indemnités maximales prévues au paragraphe (7).
(7) À compter du 1er avril 2000, les indemnités maximales annuelles à verser sont les suivantes :
a) au juge en chef du Canada 
........
18 750 $
b) aux autres juges de la Cour suprême du Canada 
........
10 000 $
c) au juge en chef de la Cour d’appel fédérale et aux juges en chef des provinces, mentionnés aux articles 12 à 21 
........
12 500 $
d) aux autres juges en chef mentionnés aux articles 10 à 21 
........
10 000 $
e) au juge principal de la Cour suprême du Yukon, à celui de la Cour suprême des Territoires du Nord-Ouest et à celui de la Cour de justice du Nunavut 
........
10 000 $
[f) abrogé]
g) aux juges en chef des cours d’appel du Yukon, des Territoires du Nord-Ouest et du Nunavut 
........
10 000 $
h) au juge en chef de la Cour d’appel de la cour martiale du Canada
........
10 000 $
Representational allowance
(6) On and after April 1, 2004, the following judges are entitled to be paid, as a representational allowance, reasonable travel and other expenses actually incurred by the judge or the spouse or common-law partner of the judge in discharging the special extra-judicial obligations and responsibilities that devolve on the judge, to the extent that those expenses may not be reimbursed under any other provision of this Act and their aggregate amount does not exceed in any year the maximum amount indicated below in respect of each judge:
(a) the Chief Justice of Canada, $18,750;
(b) each puisne judge of the Supreme Court of Canada, $10,000;
(c) the Chief Justice of the Federal Court of Appeal and each chief justice described in sections 12 to 21 as the chief justice of a province, $12,500;
(d) each other chief justice referred to in sections 10 to 21, $10,000;
(e) the Chief Justices of the Court of Appeal of Yukon, the Court of Appeal of the Northwest Territories and the Court of Appeal of Nunavut, and the senior judges of the Supreme Court of Yukon, the Supreme Court of the Northwest Territories and the Nunavut Court of Justice, $10,000 each;
(f) the Chief Justice of the Court Martial Appeal Court of Canada, $10,000; and
(g) each regional senior judge of the Superior Court of Justice in and for the Province of Ontario, $5,000.
(3) Paragraphs 27(6)(d) and (e) of the Act, as enacted by subsection (2), are replaced by the following:
(d) each other chief justice referred to in sections 10 to 22, $10,000;
(e) the Chief Justices of the Court of Appeal of Yukon, the Court of Appeal of the Northwest Territories and the Court of Appeal of Nunavut, $10,000 each;
(4) The definition “chief justice” in subsection 27(9) of the Act is replaced by the following:
(4) and (5) Existing text of subsection 27(9):
(9) In this section,
“chief justice”, except in paragraphs (7)(a) and (c), includes a senior associate chief justice and associate chief justice;
“senior judge” of the Supreme Court of Yukon, of the Supreme Court of the Northwest Territories or of the Nunavut Court of Justice means the judge with the earlier date of appointment to the court in question or, in the case of more than one judge appointed on the same day, means the judge that the Governor in Council may designate as the senior judge. 
(4) et (5) Texte du paragraphe 27(9) :
(9) Les définitions qui suivent s’appliquent au présent article.
« juge en chef » Sauf aux alinéas (7)a) et c), sont assimilés au juge en chef le juge en chef associé et le juge en chef adjoint.
« juge principal » Aux cours suprêmes du Yukon et des Territoires du Nord-Ouest et à la Cour de justice du Nunavut, le juge le plus ancien dans sa charge au tribunal ou, si plusieurs juges sont nommés le même jour, celui que le gouverneur en conseil peut désigner.
“chief justice”« juge en chef »
“chief justice”, except in paragraphs (6)(a) and (c), includes a senior associate chief justice and an associate chief justice;
(5) Subsection 27(9) of the Act, as amended by subsection (4), is replaced by the following:
Definition of “chief justice”
(9) In this section, except in paragraphs (6)(a) and (c), “chief justice” includes a senior associate chief justice and an associate chief justice.
R.S., c. 16 (3rd Supp.), s. 3; 2002, c. 8, s. 87(1)
8. Subsections 28(1) and (2) of the Act are replaced by the following:
Clause 8: Existing text of subsections 28(1) and (2):
28. (1) Where a judge of the Federal Court or a judge of the Tax Court of Canada has notified the Minister of Justice of Canada of his election to give up regular judicial duties and hold office only as a supernumerary judge, that judge shall thereupon hold only the office of supernumerary judge of that Court and shall be paid the salary annexed to that office until the judge reaches the age of retirement, resigns or is removed from or otherwise ceases to hold office.
(2) No judge may make the election referred to in subsection (1) unless the judge
(a) has attained the age of sixty-five years and has continued in judicial office for at least fifteen years; or
(b) has attained the age of seventy years and has continued in judicial office for at least ten years.
Article 8 : Texte des paragraphes 28(1) et (2) :
28. (1) Les juges de la Cour d’appel fédérale, de la Cour fédérale ou de la Cour canadienne de l’impôt peuvent, en avisant le ministre de la Justice du Canada de leur décision, abandonner leurs fonctions judiciaires normales pour n’exercer leur charge qu’à titre de juge surnuméraire; le cas échéant, ils occupent ce poste et touchent le traitement correspondant jusqu’à la cessation de leurs fonctions, notamment par mise à la retraite d’office, démission ou révocation.
(2) La faculté visée au paragraphe (1) ne peut être exercée par l’intéressé que si :
a) soit il a atteint l’âge de soixante-cinq ans et justifie d’au moins quinze ans d’ancienneté dans la magistrature;
b) soit il a atteint l’âge de soixante-dix ans et justifie d’au moins dix ans d’ancienneté dans la magistrature.
Federal Courts and Tax Court
28. (1) If a judge of the Federal Court of Appeal, the Federal Court or the Tax Court of Canada notifies the Minister of Justice of Canada of the judge’s election to give up regular judicial duties and hold office only as a supernumerary judge, the judge shall hold the office of supernumerary judge of that Court from the time notice is given until he or she reaches the age of retirement, resigns or is removed from or otherwise ceases to hold office, or until the expiry of ten years from the date of the election, whichever occurs earlier, and shall be paid the salary annexed to that office.
Restriction on election
(2) An election may be made under subsection (1) only by a judge
(a) who has continued in judicial office for at least fifteen years and whose combined age and number of years in judicial office is not less than eighty; or
(b) who has attained the age of seventy years and has continued in judicial office for at least ten years.
2002, c. 7, s. 191(1), c. 8, ss. 88(1)(E), (2)(E)
9. (1) Subsections 29(1) and (2) of the Act are replaced by the following:
Clause 9: (1) Existing text of subsections 29(1) and (2):
29. (1) Where the legislature of a province has enacted legislation establishing for each office of judge of a superior court or courts of the province the additional office of supernumerary judge of the court or courts and a judge of such a court has notified the Minister of Justice of Canada and the attorney general of the province of his election to give up regular judicial duties and hold office only as a supernumerary judge, the judge shall thereupon hold only the office of supernumerary judge of that court and shall be paid the salary annexed to that office until he reaches the age of retirement, resigns or is removed from or otherwise ceases to hold office.
(2) No judge may make the election referred to in subsection (1) unless the judge
(a) has attained the age of sixty-five years and continued in judicial office for at least fifteen years; or
(b) has attained the age of seventy years and continued in judicial office for at least ten years.
Article 9 : (1) Texte des paragraphes 29(1) et (2) :
29. (1) Dans les provinces où une loi a créé, pour chaque charge de juge de juridiction supérieure, le poste de juge surnuméraire, les juges de la juridiction peuvent, en avisant de leur décision le ministre de la Justice du Canada et le procureur général de la province, abandonner leurs fonctions judiciaires normales pour occuper seulement le poste de juge surnuméraire; le cas échéant, ils occupent ce poste et touchent le traitement correspondant jusqu’à la cessation de leurs fonctions, notamment par mise à la retraite d’office, démission ou révocation.
(2) La faculté visée au paragraphe (1) ne peut être exercée par l’intéressé que si :
a) soit il a atteint l’âge de soixante-cinq ans et justifie d’au moins quinze ans d’ancienneté dans la magistrature;
b) soit il a atteint l’âge de soixante-dix ans et justifie d’au moins dix ans d’ancienneté dans la magistrature.
Provincial superior courts
29. (1) If the legislature of a province has enacted legislation establishing for each office of judge of a superior court of the province the additional office of supernumerary judge of the court, and a judge of that court notifies the Minister of Justice of Canada and the attorney general of the province of the judge’s election to give up regular judicial duties and hold office only as a supernumerary judge, the judge shall hold the office of supernumerary judge from the time notice is given until he or she reaches the age of retirement, resigns or is removed from or otherwise ceases to hold office, or until the expiry of ten years from the date of the election, whichever occurs earlier, and shall be paid the salary annexed to that office.
Conditions
(2) An election under subsection (1) may only be made by a judge
(a) who has continued in judicial office for at least fifteen years and whose combined age and number of years in judicial office is not less than eighty; or
(b) who has attained the age of seventy years and has continued in judicial office for at least ten years.
2002, c. 7, s. 191(1)
(2) Subsection 29(3) of the Act is replaced by the following:
(2) Existing text of subsection 29(3):
(3) A judge who has made the election referred to in subsection (1) shall hold himself available to perform such special judicial duties as may be assigned to the judge
(a) by the chief justice, senior associate chief justice or associate chief justice, as the case may be, of the court of which the judge is a member or, where that court is constituted with divisions, of the division of which the judge is a member; or
(b) in the case of a supernumerary judge of the Supreme Court of the Yukon Territory, of the Supreme Court of the Northwest Territories or of the Nunavut Court of Justice, by the senior judge of that Court.
(2) Texte du paragraphe 29(3) :
(3) Le juge qui a choisi d’exercer les fonctions de juge surnuméraire doit être prêt à exercer les fonctions judiciaires spéciales que peuvent lui assigner :
a) le juge en chef, le juge en chef associé ou le juge en chef adjoint du tribunal, ou de la section de celui-ci, auquel il appartient;
b) s’il appartient à la Cour suprême du Yukon ou des Territoires du Nord-Ouest ou à la Cour de justice du Nunavut, le juge principal de celle-ci.
Duties of judge
(3) A judge who has made the election referred to in subsection (1) shall hold himself or herself available to perform such special judicial duties as may be assigned to the judge by the chief justice, senior associate chief justice or associate chief justice, as the case may be, of the court of which the judge is a member or, where that court is constituted with divisions, of the division of which the judge is a member.
2002, c. 7, s. 191(2)
(3) Subsection 29(6) of the Act is repealed.
(3) Existing text of subsection 29(6):
(6) In this section, “senior judge” of the Supreme Court of the Yukon Territory, of the Supreme Court of the Northwest Territories or of the Nunavut Court of Justice means the judge with the earlier date of appointment to the court in question, or in the case of more than one judge appointed on the same day, means the judge that the Governor in Council may designate as the senior judge.
(3) Texte du paragraphe 29(6) :
(6) Au présent article, « juge principal » s’entend, pour les cours suprêmes du Yukon et des Territoires du Nord-Ouest et pour la Cour de justice du Nunavut, du juge le plus ancien dans sa charge ou, si plusieurs juges sont nommés le même jour, de celui que le gouverneur en conseil peut désigner.
2002, c. 7, s. 193(1)
10. (1) Paragraph 40(1)(c) of the Act is replaced by the following:
Clause 10: (1) and (2) Relevant portion of subsection 40(1):
40. (1) A removal allowance shall be paid to
... 
(c) a judge of the Supreme Court of the Yukon Territory, the Supreme Court of the Northwest Territories or the Nunavut Court of Justice who, within two years after retiring or resigning from that office, moves to a place of residence in one of the ten provinces or to another territory;
... 
(e) a judge of the Supreme Court of Canada, the Federal Court or the Tax Court of Canada who, within two years after retiring or resigning from that office, moves to a place of residence in Canada outside the area within which the judge was required to reside by the Act establishing that Court; and
Article 10 : (1) et (2) Texte du passage visé du paragraphe 40(1) :
40. (1) Il est versé une allocation de déménagement :
[...] 
c) au juge de la Cour suprême du territoire du Yukon, de la Cour suprême des Territoires du Nord-Ouest ou de la Cour de justice du Nunavut qui, dans les deux ans suivant le jour où il prend sa retraite ou démissionne, s’établit dans l’une des dix provinces ou un autre territoire;
[...] 
e) au juge de la Cour suprême du Canada, de la Cour d’appel fédérale, de la Cour fédérale ou de la Cour canadienne de l’impôt qui, dans les deux ans suivant le jour où il prend sa retraite ou démissionne, s’établit, ailleurs au Canada, à l’extérieur de la zone de résidence obligatoire prévue par la loi constitutive du tribunal auquel il appartenait;
(c) a judge of the Supreme Court of Yukon, the Supreme Court of the Northwest Territories or the Nunavut Court of Justice, who moves to a place of residence in one of the ten provinces or in another territory,
(i) in respect of expenses that begin to be incurred not earlier than two years before the judge’s date of eligibility to retire, or
(ii) if no expenses are claimed under subparagraph (i), in respect of expenses that begin to be incurred not later than two years after the judge actually retires or resigns;
2002, c. 8, s. 93(2)
(2) Paragraph 40(1)(e) of the Act is replaced by the following:
(e) a judge of the Supreme Court of Canada, the Federal Court of Appeal, the Federal Court or the Tax Court of Canada who moves to a place of residence in Canada outside the area within which the judge was required to reside by the Act establishing that Court,
(i) in respect of expenses that begin to be incurred not earlier than two years before the judge’s date of eligibility to retire, or
(ii) if no expenses are claimed under subparagraph (i), in respect of expenses that begin to be incurred not later than two years after the judge actually retires or resigns; and
(3) Section 40 of the Act is amended by adding the following after subsection (1.2):
(3) New.
(3) Nouveau.
Expenses of spouse or common-law partner
(1.3) Where a removal allowance is payable to a judge of the Supreme Court of Canada, the Federal Court of Appeal, the Federal Court or the Tax Court of Canada under paragraph (1)(a), an allowance shall be paid up to a maximum of $5,000 for expenses actually incurred by the judge’s spouse or common-law partner for purposes related to employment in the judge’s new place of residence.
1998, c. 30, s. 7(2); 2002, c. 8, s. 95(1)(E)
11. Paragraph 42(1)(e) of the Act is replaced by the following:
Clause 11: Relevant portion of subsection 42(1):
42. (1) The Governor in Council shall grant to
... 
(e) a judge of the Supreme Court of Canada who has continued in judicial office on that Court for at least ten years, has attained the age of sixty-five years and resigns from office,
Article 11 : Texte du passage visé du paragraphe 42(1) :
42. (1) Le gouverneur en conseil accorde une pension égale aux deux tiers de leur dernier traitement aux juges qui :
[...] 
e) démissionnent après avoir exercé des fonctions judiciaires à la Cour suprême du Canada pendant au moins dix ans et ont atteint l’âge de soixante-cinq ans.
(e) a judge of the Supreme Court of Canada who has continued in judicial office on that Court for at least ten years and resigns from office,
2001, c. 7, s. 21
12. Subsection 43.1(2) of the Act is replaced by the following:
Clause 12: Existing text of subsection 43.1(2):
(2) The amount of the deferred annuity shall be two-thirds of the amount of the salary annexed to the judge’s office at the time of the election multiplied by a fraction, the numerator of which is the number of years, to the nearest one-tenth of a year, during which the judge has continued in judicial office and the denominator of which is the number of years, to the nearest one-tenth of a year, during which the judge would have been required to serve in judicial office in order to be eligible to be granted an annuity under paragraph 42(1)(a).
Article 12 : Texte du paragraphe 43.1(2) :
(2) La pension différée correspond aux deux tiers du traitement attaché à la charge du juge au moment où il exerce son choix, multiplié par la fraction dont le numérateur est son nombre d’années d’ancienneté, au dixième près, au sein de la magistrature et dont le dénominateur est le nombre d’années d’ancienneté, au dixième près, qui lui aurait été nécessaire pour avoir droit à une pension en vertu de l’alinéa 42(1)a).
Calculation of amount of deferred annuity
(2) The amount of the deferred annuity shall be two thirds of the amount of the salary annexed to the judge’s office at the time of the election multiplied by a fraction, the numerator of which is the number of years, to the nearest one tenth of a year, during which the judge has continued in judicial office and the denominator of which is the number of years, to the nearest one tenth of a year, during which the judge would have been required to serve in judicial office in order to be eligible to be granted an annuity under paragraph 42(1)(a) or (d), as the case may be.
2002, c. 8, s. 99
13. Subsection 50(2.1) of the Act is replaced by the following:
Clause 13: Existing text of subsection 50(2.1):
(2.1) A supernumerary judge, a judge who continues in judicial office after having been in judicial office for at least fifteen years and whose combined age and number of years in judicial office is not less than eighty, or a judge referred to in section 41.1 is not required, on or after April 1, 2000, to contribute under subsections (1) and (2) but is required to contribute, by reservation from salary, to the Supplementary Retirement Benefits Account, in respect of the period beginning on that day, at a rate of one per cent of his or her salary.
Article 13 : Texte du paragraphe 50(2.1) :
(2.1) Le juge surnuméraire, le juge qui continue à exercer ses fonctions judiciaires après les avoir exercées pendant au moins quinze ans et pour qui le chiffre obtenu par l’addition de l’âge et du nombre d’années d’exercice est d’au moins quatre-vingt, le juge de la Cour suprême du Canada qui continue à exercer ses fonctions judiciaires après les avoir exercées pendant au moins dix ans à titre de juge de cette juridiction et a atteint l’âge de soixante-cinq ans ou le juge visé à l’article 41.1 n’est pas tenu, le 1er avril 2000 ou après cette date, de verser la cotisation visée aux paragraphes (1) ou (2), mais est tenu, après cette date, de verser au compte de prestations de retraite supplémentaires, par retenue sur son traitement, une cotisation égale à un pour cent de celui-ci.
Adjustment of contributions
(2.1) A supernumerary judge, a judge who continues in judicial office after having been in judicial office for at least fifteen years and whose combined age and number of years in judicial office is not less than eighty, a judge of the Supreme Court of Canada who continues in judicial office after having held office on that Court for at least ten years, or a judge referred to in section 41.1 is not required to contribute under subsections (1) and (2) but is required to contribute, by reservation from salary, to the Supplementary Retirement Benefits Account at a rate of one per cent of his or her salary.
14. The Act is amended by adding the following after section 52:
Clause 14: New.
Article 14 : Nouveau.
Division of Judge’s Annuity on Conjugal Breakdown
Definitions
52.1 The following definitions apply in this section and sections 52.11 to 52.22.
“agreement”« accord »
“agreement” means an agreement referred to in subparagraph 52.11(2)(b)(ii).
“annuity”« pension »
“annuity” means an annuity payable under section 42, 43 or 43.1.
“application”« demande »
“application” means an application made under subsection 52.11(1).
“court order”« ordonnance »
“court order” means an order referred to in paragraph 52.11(2)(a) or subparagraph 52.11(2)(b)(i).
“interested party”« intéressé »
“interested party”, in relation to an application for division of a judge’s annuity benefits, means the judge or the spouse, former spouse or former common-law partner with whom those benefits would be divided under the application.
“judge”« juge »
“judge” means a judge or former judge who is entitled to or may become entitled to an annuity under this Act.
“Minister”« ministre »
“Minister” means the Minister of Justice of Canada.
“prescribed”Version anglaise seulement
“prescribed” means prescribed by regulation.
“spouse”« époux »
“spouse”, in relation to a judge, includes a person who is a party to a void marriage with the judge.
Application for division
52.11 (1) A judge or a spouse, former spouse or former common-law partner of a judge may, in the circumstances described in subsection (2), apply in writing to the Minister in accordance with the regulations for the division of the judge’s annuity benefits between the judge and the spouse, former spouse or former common-law partner.
When application may be made
(2) The circumstances in which an application may be made are
(a) where a court in Canada of competent jurisdiction, in proceedings in relation to divorce, annulment of marriage or separation, has made an order that provides for the annuity benefits to be divided between the interested parties; or
(b) where the interested parties are living separate and apart for a period of one year or more and, either before or after they commenced to live separate and apart,
(i) a court in Canada of competent ju­risdiction has made an order that provides for the annuity benefits to be divided between them, or
(ii) the interested parties have entered into a written agreement that provides for the annuity benefits to be divided between them.
Notice to interested parties
(3) The Minister shall send a notice of the receipt of an application in accordance with the regulations to each interested party.
Objections by interested parties
52.12 (1) An interested party who objects to the division of the annuity benefits on any of the grounds described in subsection (2) may submit a notice of objection in writing to the Minister within ninety days after the day on which notice of the receipt of the application is sent to the interested party in accordance with the regulations.
Grounds for objection
(2) The grounds for objection are as follows:
(a) the court order or agreement has been varied or is of no force or effect;
(b) the terms of the court order or agreement have been or are being satisfied by other means; or
(c) proceedings have been commenced in a court in Canada of competent jurisdiction to appeal or review the court order or challenge the terms of the agreement.
Documentary evidence
(3) An interested party who submits a notice of objection shall include with that notice documentary evidence to establish the grounds for objection.
Approval of division
52.13 (1) Subject to subsections (2) and (3), the Minister shall, as soon as is practicable after the Minister is satisfied that an application meets the requirements of this Act, approve the division of the annuity benefits for which the application is made.
When decision to be deferred
(2) Where an interested party submits a notice of objection to the Minister in accordance with section 52.12, the Minister shall
(a) if the objection is on the grounds referred to in paragraph 52.12(2)(a) or (b), defer any decision on the application until such time as the Minister is able to ascertain to the Minister’s satisfaction whether those grounds have been established; and
(b) if the objection is on the grounds referred to in paragraph 52.12(2)(c), defer any decision on the application until the final disposition of the proceedings on which those grounds are based.
Refusal of division
(3) The Minister shall refuse to approve the division of the annuity benefits if
(a) the application is withdrawn in accord­ance with the regulations;
(b) a notice of objection has been submitted on grounds referred to in paragraph 52.12(2)(a) or (b) and the Minister is satisfied that those grounds have been established and constitute sufficient reason to refuse the division;
(c) a notice of objection has been submitted on grounds referred to in paragraph 52.12(2)(c) and the court order or agreement is of no force or effect as a result of the proceedings referred to in that paragraph;
(d) the period of cohabitation of the judge and the spouse, former spouse or former common-law partner cannot be determined under subsection 52.14(4); or
(e) the Minister is satisfied, based on evidence submitted to the Minister, that it would not be just to approve the division.
Exception
(4) Notwithstanding subsection (3), the Minister may approve the division of the annuity benefits on the basis of an order of a court issued pursuant to any proceedings referred to in paragraph 52.12(2)(c).
Transitional
(5) The Minister may approve the division of the annuity benefits even though the court order or agreement on which the application is based was made or entered into before the day on which subsection 52.11(1) comes into force.
Division of annuity benefits
52.14 (1) Where the Minister approves the division of the annuity benefits of a judge,
(a) the spouse, former spouse or former common-law partner shall be accorded a share of the annuity benefits consisting of one of the following:
(i) a sum representing fifty per cent of a proportion, determined in accordance with subsection (2), of the value of the annuity benefits that are deemed, in accordance with the regulations, to have accrued to the judge,
(ii) in the case of a judge who has not become entitled to an annuity, a sum equal to fifty per cent of the contributions made by the judge under section 50 during the period subject to division and of any interest payable on those contributions, unless the spouse, former spouse or former common-law partner of a judge elects, in the prescribed manner, to receive, at such time as the judge becomes entitled to an annuity, an amount determined at that time in accordance with subparagraph (i), or
(iii) if the terms of a court order or the agreement provide for the payment to the spouse, former spouse or former common-law partner of an amount that is less than the amount determined under subparagraph (i) or (ii), as the case may be, that lesser amount; and
(b) the annuity benefits that are deemed, in accordance with the regulations, to have accrued to the judge shall be adjusted in the manner provided by the regulations.
Proportion
(2) The proportion of the value of annuity benefits referred to in subparagraph (1)(a)(i) is the period subject to division as a fraction of the total years of service of the judge up to the actual date of retirement or, in the case of a judge who has not yet retired, the expected date of retirement determined in accordance with the regulations.
Death of judge
(3) If an election has been made to receive an amount under subparagraph (1)(a)(ii) and the judge dies or ceases to hold office before becoming entitled to an annuity, the spouse, former spouse or former common-law partner shall instead be paid immediately an amount equal to fifty per cent of the contributions made by the judge under section 50 during the period subject to division and of any interest payable on those contributions.
Determination of periods of division and cohabitation
(4) For the purposes of this section,
(a) the period subject to division is the portion of the period of cohabitation during which the judge held office under this Act, measured in years to the nearest one tenth of a year; and
(b) the period of cohabitation is the period during which the interested parties cohabited, as specified by the court order or agreement or, if none is specified, as determined in accordance with the regulations on the basis of evidence submitted by either or both of the interested parties.
Death of spouse, former spouse or former common-law partner
(5) A share of annuity benefits that cannot be accorded under subsection (1) by reason only of the death of the spouse, former spouse or former common-law partner shall be paid to that person’s estate or succession.
Adjustment of accrued benefits
(6) The adjustment of annuity benefits required by paragraph (1)(b) shall be effective as of the date determined in accordance with the regulations, which date may be before the date on which the adjustment is actually made.
Notice of division
(7) The Minister shall send a notice of the division of the annuity benefits in the prescribed manner to each interested party.
Transfer and payment of share
52.15 (1) The spouse’s, former spouse’s or former common-law partner’s share of a judge’s annuity benefits shall be accorded by
(a) the transfer of the specified portion of that share to a retirement savings plan for the spouse, former spouse or former common-law partner that is of the prescribed kind for the purposes of section 26 of the Pension Benefits Standards Act, 1985; and
(b) the payment of the remainder of that share, if any, to the spouse, former spouse or former common-law partner.
Calculation of specified portion
(2) For the purpose of paragraph (1)(a), the specified portion of a spouse’s, former spouse’s or former common-law partner’s share of a judge’s annuity benefits is
(a) if that share consists of a portion of the judge’s contributions, that portion; or
(b) in any other case, the amount determined by the formula
(A x B x C)/D
where
A       is the share of the annuity benefits,
B       is the period subject to division,
C       is the defined benefit limit, within the meaning of regulations made under the Income Tax Act, for the calendar year in which the share is accorded, and
D       is the amount of the annuity benefits expressed on an annualized basis that are deemed, in accordance with the regulations, to have accrued to the judge during the period subject to division.
Tax treatment
(3) For the purposes of the Income Tax Act, an amount transferred to a retirement savings plan in accordance with paragraph (1)(a) is deemed to be an amount transferred from a registered pension plan in accordance with subsection 147.3(5) of that Act.
Further divisions precluded
52.16 Where a division of annuity benefits that are deemed to have accrued to a judge during any period is made under section 52.14, no further divisions may be made under that section in respect of that period.
Amounts transferred in error
52.17 If the amount transferred or paid in respect of a spouse, former spouse or former common-law partner, or paid to the estate or succession of a deceased spouse, former spouse or former common-law partner, under section 52.14 or 52.15 exceeds the amount that the spouse, former spouse or former common-law partner was entitled to have transferred or paid or the estate or succession was entitled to be paid, the amount in excess constitutes a debt due to Her Majesty in right of Canada by that spouse, former spouse or former common-law partner or that estate or succession.
Amounts paid before adjustment
52.18 Where an adjustment is made under paragraph 52.14(1)(b) and an amount is or has been paid to a judge that exceeds the amount to which the judge is or would have been entitled under this Act after the effective date of that adjustment, the amount in excess constitutes a debt due to Her Majesty in right of Canada by the judge and may be recovered at any time by set-off against any annuity benefit that is payable to the judge under this Act, without prejudice to any other recourse available to Her Majesty in right of Canada with respect to its recovery.
Void transactions
52.19 (1) Amounts that a spouse, former spouse or former common-law partner is or may become entitled to under section 52.14 are not capable of being assigned, charged, anticipated or given as security, and any transaction that purports to assign, charge, anticipate or give as security any such amount is void.
Exemption from attachment, etc.
(2) Amounts that a spouse, former spouse or former common-law partner is or may become entitled to under section 52.14 are exempt from attachment, seizure and execution, either at law or in equity.
Access of spouse, etc. to division of benefits
52.2 Notwithstanding any other provision of this Act, a court of competent jurisdiction may order, for any period that the court determines, that no action be taken by the Minister under this Act that may prejudice the ability of the spouse, common-law partner, former spouse or former common-law partner to make an application or obtain a division of the judge’s annuity benefits under this Act.
Information for spouse, etc. re benefits
52.21 The Minister shall, in accordance with the regulations, on request of a spouse, common-law partner, former spouse or former common-law partner of a judge, provide that person with information prescribed by the regulations concerning the benefits that are or may become payable to or in respect of that judge under this Act.
Regulations
52.22 The Governor in Council may make regulations
(a) respecting the information to be provided in an application and the documents that are to accompany an application;
(b) prescribing circumstances in which interested parties are deemed to have been living separate and apart for the purposes of paragraph 52.11(2)(b);
(c) prescribing the circumstances in which a person may make an application on behalf of another person or may act on behalf of another person in proceeding with an application that has been made by that other person;
(d) prescribing the circumstances in which, the manner in which and the conditions under which the personal representative or the liquidator of the succession of a deceased judge or of a deceased spouse, former spouse or former common-law partner may make an application or may proceed with an application that was made by the judge, spouse, former spouse or former common-law partner;
(e) where regulations are made under paragraph (c) or (d), respecting the manner in which and the extent to which any provision of this Act applies to a person referred to in that paragraph or in the circumstances prescribed by those regulations, and adapting any provision of this Act to those persons or circumstances;
(f) prescribing the circumstances in which, the manner in which and the conditions under which a spouse, former spouse or former common-law partner may make an application after the death of a judge;
(g) respecting the notice of receipt of applications to be given to interested parties under subsection 52.11(3);
(h) respecting the withdrawal of applications;
(i) for determining, for the purposes of subsections 52.14(1) and 52.15(2), on the basis of generally accepted actuarial principles and demographic assumptions prescribed by the regulations, the value of the annuity benefits that are deemed to have accrued to a judge;
(j) for determining, for the purposes of subsection 52.14(2), on the basis of demographic assumptions prescribed by the regulations, the expected date of retirement of a judge;
(k) respecting the adjustment, pursuant to paragraph 52.14(1)(b), by a factor not exceeding fifty per cent, of the annuity benefits that are deemed to have accrued to a judge;
(l) prescribing, for the purposes of paragraph 52.14(4)(b), the manner of determining the period during which interested parties cohabited;
(m) respecting the determination of the effective date of the adjustment of annuity benefits for the purposes of subsection 52.14(6);
(n) respecting the manner in which and the extent to which any provision of this Act applies, notwithstanding any other provisions of this Act, to any judge, to any spouse, former spouse, common-law partner or former common-law partner of a judge or to any other person where annuity benefits are divided under section 52.14, and adapting any provision of this Act to those persons;
(o) respecting the provision of information, for the purposes of section 52.21, to a spouse, former spouse, common-law partner or former common-law partner of a judge concerning the benefits that are or may become payable to or in respect of that judge;
(p) prescribing any matter or thing that by any of sections 52.1 to 52.21 is to be or may be prescribed; and
(q) generally for carrying out the purposes and provisions of sections 52.1 to 52.21.
PART 2
R.S., c. F-7; 2002, c. 8, s. 14
AMENDMENTS TO THE FEDERAL COURTS ACT
2001, c. 41, par. 144(2)(b)
15. Subsection 5.1(1) of the Federal Courts Act is replaced by the following:
Federal Courts Act
Clause 15: Existing text of subsection 5.1(1):
5.1 (1) The Federal Court consists of a chief justice called the Chief Justice of the Federal Court, who is the president of the Federal Court, and 32 other judges.
Loi sur les Cours fédérales
Article 15 : Texte du paragraphe 5.1(1) :
5.1 (1) La Cour fédérale se compose du juge en chef, appelé juge en chef de la Cour fédérale, qui en est le président, et de trente-deux autres juges.
Composition of the Federal Court
5.1 (1) The Federal Court consists of a chief justice called the Chief Justice of the Federal Court, who is the president of the Federal Court, 32 other judges and any prothonotary appointed under section 12.
2002, c. 8, s. 16
16. Section 5.4 of the Act is replaced by the following:
Clause 16: Existing text of section 5.4:
5.4 At least four of the judges of the Federal Court of Appeal and at least six of the judges of the Federal Court must be persons who have been judges of the Court of Appeal or of the Superior Court of the Province of Quebec, or have been members of the bar of that Province.
Article 16 : Texte de l’article 5.4 :
5.4 Au moins quatre juges de la Cour d’appel fédérale et six juges de la Cour fédérale doivent avoir été juges de la Cour d’appel ou de la Cour supérieure du Québec ou membres du barreau de cette province.
Judges from Quebec
5.4 At least five of the judges of the Federal Court of Appeal and at least ten of the judges of the Federal Court must be persons who have been judges of the Court of Appeal or of the Superior Court of the Province of Quebec, or have been members of the bar of that Province.
2002, c. 8, s. 19
17. Subsection 10(4) of the Act is replaced by the following:
Clause 17: Existing text of subsection 10(4):
(4) A person who acts as a judge of a court under subsection (1) or (1.1) shall be paid a salary for the period that the judge acts, at the rate fixed by the Judges Act for a judge of the court other than the Chief Justice of the court, less any amount otherwise payable to him or her under that Act in respect of that period, and shall also be paid the travel allowances that a judge is entitled to be paid under the Judges Act.
Article 17 : Texte du paragraphe 10(4) :
(4) Les juges suppléants reçoivent le traitement fixé par la Loi sur les juges pour les juges du tribunal auquel ils sont affectés, autres que le juge en chef, diminué des montants qui leur sont par ailleurs payables aux termes de cette loi pendant leur suppléance. Ils ont également droit aux indemnités de déplacement prévues par cette même loi.
Judges
(4) A judge of a superior, county or district court shall be paid a per diem salary for the period during which the judge acts, less any amount otherwise payable to him or her under the Judges Act in respect of that period, and shall also be paid the travel allowances that a judge is entitled to be paid under that Act. The salary shall be based on the salary fixed by that Act for a judge, other than the Chief Justice, of the court in which the judge acts.
Former judges
(5) A person who has held office as a judge of a superior, county or district court shall be paid a per diem salary for the period during which the person acts and shall also be paid the travel allowances that a judge is entitled to be paid under the Judges Act. However, the period during which the person may act as a judge in a year shall not exceed one third of the days worked in a year by a judge, other than a supernumerary judge, of the court in which the person acts. The salary shall be based on the salary fixed by the Judges Act for a judge of that court, other than the Chief Justice.
Annuities
(6) A person who has held office as a judge of a superior, county or district court may continue to receive an annuity under the Judges Act while acting as a judge of the Federal Court or the Federal Court of Appeal.
18. (1) Subsection 12(2) of the Act is repealed.
Clause 18: (1) Existing text of subsection 12(2):
(2) The Governor in Council shall designate one of the prothonotaries to be Senior Prothonotary and one of the prothonotaries to be Associate Senior Prothonotary.
Article 18 : (1) Texte du paragraphe 12(2) :
(2) Le gouverneur en conseil désigne le protonotaire en chef et le protonotaire adjoint.
(2) Subsection 12(5) of the Act is replaced by the following:
(2) Existing text of subsection 12(5):
(5) For the purposes of the Public Service Superannuation Act, a prothonotary shall be deemed to be employed in the Public Service.
(2) Texte du paragraphe 12(5) :
(5) Pour l’application de la Loi sur la pension de la fonction publique, les protonotaires sont réputés appartenir à la fonction publique.
Superannuation
(5) Subject to any regulations made under subsection 12.1(6), a prothonotary shall be deemed for the purposes of the Public Service Superannuation Act to be employed in the public service.
19. The Act is amended by adding the following after section 12:
Clause 19: New.
Article 19 : Nouveau.
Compensation and benefits committee
12.1 (1) The Governor in Council may establish, by regulation, a committee to inquire into the adequacy of the salary of prothonotaries, their benefits generally and any other amounts payable to them.
Appointments
(2) The committee shall consist of three part-time members appointed by the Governor in Council.
Term of office
(3) A person appointed to the committee shall be appointed for a term of four years. Each member holds office during good behaviour and may be removed for cause at any time by the Governor in Council.
Remuneration
(4) Members of the committee shall be paid, in connection with their work for the committee, the remuneration that may be fixed by the Governor in Council and are entitled to be reimbursed the travel, living and other expenses, as are fixed by the Governor in Council, incurred in connection with their work for the committee while absent from their ordinary place of residence.
Personnel
(5) The committee may engage the services of any persons necessary for the proper conduct of the committee, but no person engaged shall, as a result, be considered to be employed in the federal public administration.
Regulations
(6) The Governor in Council may make regulations respecting
(a) the committee, including its terms of reference, composition, functioning and reports, and the reappointment of committee members;
(b) the salary of prothonotaries, their benefits generally and any other amounts payable to them; and
(c) any other matter that the Governor in Council considers necessary for carrying out the purposes and provisions of this section.
Retroactive effect
(7) Regulations made under paragraph (6)(b) may, if they so provide, be retroactive and have effect with respect to any period before they are made.
2002, c. 8, s. 43(1)
20. Paragraph 45.1(1)(b) of the Act is replaced by the following:
Clause 20: Relevant portion of subsection 45.1(1):
45.1 (1) There shall be a rules committee composed of the following members:
... 
(b) three judges designated by the Chief Justice of the Federal Court of Appeal and five judges designated by the Chief Justice of the Federal Court;
Article 20 : Texte du passage visé du paragraphe 45.1(1) :
45.1 (1) Est constitué un comité des règles composé des membres suivants :
[...] 
b) trois juges désignés par le juge en chef de la Cour d’appel fédérale et cinq juges désignés par le juge en chef de la Cour fédérale;
(b) three judges designated by the Chief Justice of the Federal Court of Appeal, and five judges and one prothonotary designated by the Chief Justice of the Federal Court;
PART 3
AMENDMENTS TO OTHER ACTS
1996, c. 10
Canada Transportation Act
2002, c. 8, s. 122
21. Subsection 33(1) of the Canada Transportation Act is replaced by the following:
Canada Transportation Act
Clause 21: Existing text of subsection 33(1):
33. (1) A decision or order of the Agency may be made an order of any superior court and is enforceable in the same manner as such an order.
Loi sur les transports au Canada
Article 21 : Texte du paragraphe 33(1) :
33. (1) Les décisions ou arrêtés de l’Office peuvent être homologués par une cour supérieure; le cas échéant, leur exécution s’effectue selon les mêmes modalités que les ordonnances de la cour saisie.
Enforcement of decision or order
33. (1) A decision or an order of the Agency may be made an order of the Federal Court or of any superior court and is enforceable in the same manner as such an order.
R.S., c. C-46
Criminal Code
2002, c. 7, s. 140
22. Paragraph 188(4)(f) of the Criminal Code is replaced by the following:
Criminal Code
Clause 22: Relevant portion of subsection 188(4):
(4) In this section, “Chief Justice” means
... 
(f) in the Yukon Territory, the Northwest Territories and Nunavut, the senior judge within the meaning of subsection 22(3) of the Judges Act.
Code criminel
Article 22 : Texte du passage visé du paragraphe 188(4) :
(4) Au présent article, « juge en chef » désigne :
[...] 
f) au Yukon, dans les Territoires du Nord-Ouest et au Nunavut, le juge principal, au sens du paragraphe 22(3) de la Loi sur les juges.
(f) in Yukon, the Northwest Territories and Nunavut, the Chief Justice.
R.S., c. C-50; 1990, c. 8, s. 21
Crown Liability and Proceedings Act
1990, c. 8, s. 32
23. (1) Paragraph 34(a) of the Crown Liability and Proceedings Act is replaced by the following:
Crown Liability and Proceedings Act
Clause 23: (1) and (2) Relevant portion of section 34:
34. The Governor in Council may make regulations
(a) prescribing rules of practice and procedure in respect of proceedings by or against the Crown, including tariffs of fees and costs;
... 
(d) making applicable to any proceedings against the Crown all or any of the rules of evidence applicable in similar proceedings between subject and subject; and
(e) generally respecting proceedings by or against the Crown.
Loi sur la responsabilité civile de l’État et le contentieux administratif
Article 23 : (1) et (2) Texte du passage visé de l’article 34 :
34. Le gouverneur en conseil peut, par règlement :
a) prescrire des règles de pratique et de procédure applicables lors des poursuites auxquelles l’État est partie, ainsi que fixer les tarifs d’honoraires et les dépens;
[...] 
d) appliquer aux poursuites visant l’État toute règle de preuve applicable entre particuliers;
e) d’une façon générale, prendre toute mesure nécessaire relativement aux poursuites auxquelles l’État est partie.
(a) prescribing rules of practice and procedure in respect of proceedings by, against or involving the Crown, including tariffs of fees and costs;
1990, c. 8, s. 32
(2) Paragraphs 34(d) and (e) of the Act are replaced by the following:
(d) making applicable to any proceedings by, against or involving the Crown all or any of the rules of evidence applicable in similar proceedings between subject and subject; and
(e) generally respecting proceedings by, against or involving the Crown.
1996, c. 23
Employment Insurance Act
2002, c. 8, par. 182(1)(o)
24. Section 105 of the Employment Insurance Act is replaced by the following:
Employment Insurance Act
Clause 24: Existing text of section 105:
105. The decision of the Tax Court of Canada under section 103 is final and, except for judicial review under the Federal Court Act, is not subject to appeal to or review by any court.
Loi sur l’assurance-emploi
Article 24 : Texte de l’article 105 :
105. La décision rendue par la Cour canadienne de l’impôt en vertu de l’article 103 est définitive et sans appel; elle peut cependant faire l’objet d’une demande de contrôle judiciaire aux termes de la Loi sur les Cours fédérales.
Decision final
105. The decision of the Tax Court of Canada under section 103 is final and, except for an appeal under the Federal Courts Act, is not subject to appeal to or review by any court.
1993, c. 28
Nunavut Act
1999, c. 3, s. 1
25. Section 10 of the Nunavut Act is replaced by the following:
Nunavut Act
Clause 25: Existing text of section 10:
10. If both the Commissioner and the Deputy Commissioner are absent, ill or unable to act or both those offices are vacant, the senior judge, within the meaning of subsection 22(3) of the Judges Act, of the Nunavut Court of Justice has and may exercise and perform all of the powers, duties and functions of the Commissioner.
Loi sur le Nunavut
Article 25 : Texte de l’article 10 :
10. En cas d’absence ou d’empêchement du commissaire et du commissaire adjoint, ou de vacance simultanée de leur poste, l’intérim est assuré par le juge principal, au sens du paragraphe 22(3) de la Loi sur les juges, de la Cour de justice.
Absence or incapacity
10. If both the Commissioner and the Deputy Commissioner are absent, ill or unable to act or both those offices are vacant, the Chief Justice of the Nunavut Court of Justice has and may exercise and perform all of the powers, duties and functions of the Commissioner.
R.S., c. P-10; 2001, c. 4, s. 113(F)
Pesticide Residue Compensation Act
1990, c. 8, s. 60
26. Subsection 14(1) of the Pesticide Res­idue Compensation Act is replaced by the following:
Pesticide Residue Compensation Act
Clause 26: Existing text of subsection 14(1):
14. (1) The Governor in Council may, from among the judges of the superior, district or county courts of the provinces, appoint an Assessor and such number of Deputy Assessors as the Governor in Council considers necessary to hear and determine appeals from compensation awards made under this Act or under any other Act to which this Part is made applicable, and, subject to this Act, may prescribe their jurisdiction.
Loi sur l’indemnisation du dommage causé par des pesticides
Article 26 : Texte du paragraphe 14(1) :
14. (1) Le gouverneur en conseil peut, parmi les juges des cours supérieures, de district et de comté des provinces, nommer un évaluateur ainsi que le nombre d’évaluateurs adjoints qu’il estime nécessaires pour juger les appels des décisions d’indemnisation rendues sous le régime de la présente loi ou de toute autre loi à laquelle la présente partie s’applique. Sous réserve des autres dispositions de la présente loi, il peut également définir leur compétence.
Assessor and Deputy Assessors
14. (1) The Governor in Council may, from among the judges of the Federal Court and the judges of the superior, district or county courts of the provinces, appoint an Assessor and such number of Deputy Assessors as the Governor in Council considers necessary to hear and determine appeals from compensation awards made under this Act or under any other Act to which this Part is made applicable and, subject to this Act, may prescribe their jurisdiction.
R.S., c. 32 (4th Supp.)
Railway Safety Act
2002, c. 8, s. 168
27. Subsection 34(1) of the Railway Safety Act is replaced by the following:
Railway Safety Act
Clause 27: Existing text of subsection 34(1):
34. (1) An order or emergency directive made by the Minister may be made an order of any superior court, and shall be enforced in the same manner as an order of the court.
Loi sur la sécurité ferroviaire
Article 27 : Texte du paragraphe 34(1) :
34. (1) Les ordres et les injonctions ministériels peuvent être assimilés à des ordonnances d’une cour supérieure; le cas échéant, leur exécution s’effectue selon les mêmes modalités.
Enforcement through court
34. (1) An order or emergency directive made by the Minister may be made an order of the Federal Court or any superior court and shall be enforced in the same manner as an order of the court.
R.S., c. T-2
Tax Court of Canada Act
2002, c. 8, s. 65(2)(E)
28. Subsection 9(4) of the Tax Court of Canada Act is replaced by the following:
Tax Court of Canada Act
Clause 28: Existing text of subsection 9(4):
(4) A person who acts as a judge pursuant to subsection (1) shall be paid a salary for the period he acts at the rate fixed by the Judges Act for a judge of the Court, other than the Chief Justice or the Associate Chief Justice, less any amount otherwise payable to him under that Act in respect of that period, and shall also be paid the travel allowances that a judge is entitled to be paid under that Act.
Loi sur la Cour canadienne de l’impôt
Article 28 : Texte du paragraphe 9(4) :
(4) Les juges suppléants visés au paragraphe (1) reçoivent le traitement fixé par la Loi sur les juges pour les juges, autres que le juge en chef et le juge en chef adjoint, diminué des montants qui leur sont par ailleurs payables aux termes de cette loi pendant leur suppléance. Ils ont également droit, le cas échéant, aux indemnités de déplacement prévues par la même loi.
Judges
(4) A judge of a superior court or a judge of any other court who was appointed under an Act of the legislature of a province shall be paid a per diem salary for the period during which the judge acts, less any amount otherwise payable to him or her under the Judges Act in respect of that period, and shall also be paid the travel allowances that a judge is entitled to be paid under that Act. The salary shall be based on the salary fixed by that Act for a judge of the Court, other than the Chief Justice or Associate Chief Justice.
Former judges
(5) A former judge of a superior court or a former judge of any other court who was appointed under an Act of the legislature of a province shall be paid a per diem salary for the period during which the former judge acts and shall also be paid the travel allowances that a judge is entitled to be paid under the Judges Act. However, the period during which a former judge may act as a judge in a year shall not exceed one third of the days worked in a year by a judge of the Court, other than a supernumerary judge. The salary shall be based on the salary fixed by the Judges Act for a judge of the Court, other than the Chief Justice or Associate Chief Justice.
Annuities
(6) A former judge of a superior court may continue to receive an annuity under the Judges Act while acting as a judge of the Court.
2002, c. 9, s. 10(3)
29. Subsection 12(4) of the Act is replaced by the following:
Clause 29: Existing text of subsection 12(4):
(4) The Court has exclusive original jurisdiction to hear and determine applications for extensions of time under section 45 or 47 of the Air Travellers Security Charge Act, subsection 28(1) of the Canada Pension Plan, section 33.2 of the Cultural Property Export and Import Act, section 97.52 or 97.53 of the Customs Act, subsection 103(1) of the Employment Insurance Act, section 197 or 199 of the Excise Act, 2001, section 304 or 305 of the Excise Tax Act, or section 166.2 or 167 of the Income Tax Act.
Article 29 : Texte du paragraphe 12(4) :
(4) La Cour a compétence exclusive pour entendre toute demande de prorogation de délai présentée en vertu des articles 45 ou 47 de la Loi sur le droit pour la sécurité des passagers du transport aérien, du paragraphe 28(1) du Régime de pensions du Canada, de l’article 33.2 de la Loi sur l’exportation et l’importation de biens culturels, des articles 97.52 ou 97.53 de la Loi sur les douanes, du paragraphe 103(1) de la Loi sur l’assurance-emploi, des articles 197 ou 199 de la Loi de 2001 sur l’accise, des articles 304 ou 305 de la Loi sur la taxe d’accise ou des articles 166.2 ou 167 de la Loi de l’impôt sur le revenu.
Extensions of time
(4) The Court has exclusive original jurisdiction to hear and determine applications for extensions of time under section 45 or 47 of the Air Travellers Security Charge Act, subsection 28(1) of the Canada Pension Plan, section 33.2 of the Cultural Property Export and Import Act, section 97.51 or 97.52 of the Customs Act, subsection 103(1) of the Employment Insurance Act, section 197 or 199 of the Excise Act, 2001, section 304 or 305 of the Excise Tax Act, or section 166.2 or 167 of the Income Tax Act.
R.S., c. 51 (4th Supp.), s. 5; 1998, c. 19, s. 291(1)
30. Section 17.2 of the Act is replaced by the following:
Clause 30: Existing text of section 17.2:
17.2 (1) Unless the Act under which the proceeding arises provides otherwise, a proceeding in respect of which this section applies shall be instituted by filing an originating document in the form set out in the rules of Court and by paying the filing fee in accordance with those rules.
(2) The originating document shall be filed
(a) by depositing the original and two copies of the document in the Registry of the Court;
(b) by forwarding by mail the original and two copies of the document to the Registry of the Court; or
(c) by any other means, including electronic means, in the form and manner provided for in the rules of Court.
(2.1) The date of filing of an originating document in the Registry of the Court is deemed to be the day on which the document is received by the Registry.
(2.2) Where an originating document is filed in accordance with paragraph (2)(c), the party who instituted the proceeding or that party’s counsel shall forthwith send the original and two copies of the document to the Registry of the Court.
(3) Where the original and two copies of the originating document have been received by the Registry of the Court and the filing fee has been paid as required by this section, an officer of the Registry of the Court shall, after verifying the accuracy of the copies, forthwith, on behalf of the party who instituted the proceeding, serve the originating document on Her Majesty in right of Canada by transmitting the copies to the office of the Deputy Attorney General of Canada.
(4) When the copies have been transmitted to the office of the Deputy Attorney General of Canada under subsection (3), a certificate signed by an officer of the Registry of the Court respecting the date of filing and the date of transmission of the copies shall be delivered or forwarded by registered mail to the party who instituted the proceeding or that party’s counsel at the address appearing on the originating document, or at such other address as may have been communicated to the Registry of the Court for the purpose.
(5) A certificate referred to in subsection (4) is evidence of the date of filing and the date of service of the originating document referred to in the certificate.
Article 30 : Texte de l’article 17.2 :
17.2 (1) Sous réserve de la loi habilitante, il faut, pour engager une procédure, déposer un acte introductif d’instance établi selon le modèle prévu par les règles de la Cour et accompagné des droits fixés par celles-ci.
(2) Le dépôt de l’acte introductif d’instance s’effectue :
a) par la remise de l’original et de deux copies de l’acte au greffe de la Cour;
b) par l’expédition par la poste de l’original et de deux copies de l’acte au greffe de la Cour;
c) par tout autre moyen, y compris électronique, selon le modèle et les modalités prévus par les règles de la Cour.
(2.1) Le dépôt prévu au paragraphe (1) est réputé effectué le jour où l’acte introductif d’instance est reçu au greffe de la Cour.
(2.2) Si le dépôt prévu au paragraphe (1) est effectué en conformité avec l’alinéa (2)c), la partie qui a engagé la procédure, ou son avocat, envoie aussitôt l’original et deux copies de l’acte introductif d’instance au greffe de la Cour.
(3) Une fois l’original et deux copies de l’acte introductif d’instance reçus au greffe de la Cour et le droit correspondant acquitté, le fonctionnaire compétent du greffe de la Cour signifie aussitôt, au nom de la partie qui a engagé la procédure, l’acte introductif d’instance à Sa Majesté du chef du Canada en transmettant les copies — dont il a pris soin d’attester la conformité avec l’original — au bureau du sous-procureur général du Canada.
(4) Une fois les copies transmises au bureau du sous-procureur général du Canada sous le régime du paragraphe (3), un certificat attestant la date de dépôt et la date de transmission des copies est signé par le fonctionnaire compétent du greffe et délivré, ou envoyé par courrier recommandé, à la partie qui a engagé la procédure ou à son avocat à l’adresse figurant sur l’acte introductif d’instance ou à l’adresse communiquée au greffe à cette fin.
(5) Le certificat établi aux termes du paragraphe (4) fait foi de la date de dépôt et de la date de signification de l’acte introductif d’instance dont il y est fait mention.
How proceeding instituted
17.2 (1) Unless the Act under which the proceeding arises provides otherwise, a proceeding in respect of which this section applies shall be instituted by filing an originating document in the form and manner set out in the rules of Court and by paying, in accordance with the rules, any required filing fee.
Filing date
(2) An originating document is deemed to be filed on the day on which it is received by the Registry of the Court.
Service of originating document
(3) After the proceeding has been instituted, an officer of the Registry of the Court shall, on behalf of the party who instituted the proceeding and in accordance with the rules of the Court, serve the originating document without delay on Her Majesty in right of Canada by transmitting a copy to the office of the Deputy Attorney General of Canada.
Certificate
(4) An officer of the Registry of the Court shall, in accordance with the rules of the Court, deliver or forward to the party who instituted the proceeding a certificate indicating the date of filing of the originating document and the date of service on Her Majesty in right of Canada.
Certificate to be evidence
(5) A certificate is evidence of the dates of filing and service.
R.S., c. 51 (4th Supp.), s. 5; 1998, c. 19, s. 292(1)
31. Section 18.15 of the Act is replaced by the following:
Clause 31: Existing text of section 18.15:
18.15 (1) An appeal referred to in section 18 shall be made in writing and shall set out, in general terms, the reasons for the appeal and the relevant facts, but no special form of pleadings is required unless the Act out of which the appeal arises expressly provides otherwise.
(2) An appeal referred to in section 18 may be brought in the form set out in the rules of Court.
(3) An appeal referred to in section 18 shall be instituted by
(a) filing the original of the written appeal referred to in subsection (1); and
(b) paying $100 as a filing fee.
(3.1) The written appeal referred to in subsection (1) shall be filed
(a) by depositing the original of the written appeal in the Registry of the Court;
(b) by mailing the original of the written appeal to the Registry of the Court; or
(c) by using any other means, including electronic means, in the form and manner provided for in the rules of Court.
(3.2) The date of filing of a written appeal in the Registry of the Court is deemed to be the day on which the written appeal is received by the Registry.
(3.3) Where a written appeal is filed in accordance with paragraph (3.1)(c), the party who instituted the proceeding or that party’s counsel or agent shall forthwith send the original of the written appeal to the Registry of the Court.
(3.4) The Court may, on application made by an individual in the written appeal referred to in subsection (1), waive the payment of the filing fee where the Court is satisfied that its payment would cause severe financial hardship to the individual.
(3.5) The Court shall decide whether to grant an application made under subsection (3.4) solely on the basis of the information contained in the written appeal referred to in subsection (1).
(4) Notwithstanding the provisions of the Act out of which an appeal arises, the Court, in hearing an appeal referred to in section 18, is not bound by any legal or technical rules of evidence in conducting a hearing for the purposes of that Act, and all appeals referred to in section 18 shall be dealt with by the Court as informally and expeditiously as the circumstances and considerations of fairness permit.
Article 31 : Texte de l’article 18.15 :
18.15 (1) Sous réserve de la loi habilitante, l’appel visé à l’article 18 est interjeté par écrit et contient l’exposé sommaire des faits et moyens; la présentation de la plaidoirie n’est assujettie à aucune condition de forme.
(2) L’appel visé à l’article 18 peut être interjeté conformément au modèle prévu par les règles de la Cour.
(3) Pour interjeter l’appel visé à l’article 18, il faut :
a) d’une part, déposer au greffe de la Cour le document écrit mentionné au paragraphe (1);
b) d’autre part, acquitter la somme de 100 $ comme droit de dépôt.
(3.1) Le dépôt du document écrit mentionné au paragraphe (1) s’effectue :
a) par la remise de l’original du document au greffe de la Cour;
b) par l’expédition par la poste de l’original du document au greffe de la Cour;
c) par tout autre moyen, y compris électronique, selon le modèle et les modalités prévus par les règles de la Cour.
(3.2) Le dépôt prévu au paragraphe (3) est réputé effectué le jour où le document écrit est reçu au greffe de la Cour.
(3.3) Si le dépôt prévu au paragraphe (3) est effectué en conformité avec l’alinéa (3.1)c), la partie qui a engagé la procédure, ou son avocat ou autre représentant, envoie aussitôt l’original du document écrit au greffe de la Cour.
(3.4) À la demande d’un particulier faite dans le document mentionné au paragraphe (1), la Cour peut renoncer au droit de dépôt si elle est convaincue que son paiement causerait de sérieuses difficultés financières au particulier.
(3.5) La Cour fonde sa décision de renoncer ou non au droit de dépôt uniquement sur la base des renseignements indiqués dans le document mentionné au paragraphe (1).
(4) Par dérogation à la loi habilitante, la Cour n’est pas liée par les règles de preuve lors de l’audition d’un appel interjeté en vertu de cette loi et visé à l’article 18; ces appels sont entendus d’une manière informelle et le plus rapidement possible, dans la mesure où les circonstances et l’équité le permettent.
How proceeding instituted
18.15 (1) An appeal referred to in section 18 shall be instituted by filing an originating document with the Registry of the Court in the manner set out in the rules of Court and by paying, in accordance with the rules, any required filing fee. The document shall set out, in general terms, the reasons for the appeal and the relevant facts, but no special form is required unless the Act under which the appeal arises provides otherwise.
Filing date
(2) An originating document is deemed to be filed on the day on which it is received by the Registry.
Hearing
(3) Notwithstanding the provisions of the Act under which the appeal arises, the Court is not bound by any legal or technical rules of evidence in conducting a hearing and the appeal shall be dealt with by the Court as informally and expeditiously as the circumstances and considerations of fairness permit.
1998, c. 19, s. 283
32. Subsection 18.26(1) of the Act is replaced by the following:
Clause 32: Existing text of subsection 18.26(1):
18.26 (1) Where an appeal referred to in section 18 is allowed, the Court
(a) shall reimburse to the appellant the filing fee paid by the appellant under paragraph 18.15(3)(b); and
(b) where the judgment reduces the aggregate of all amounts in issue or the amount of interest in issue, or increases the amount of loss in issue, as the case may be, by more than one-half, may award costs to the appellant in accordance with the rules of Court.
Article 32 : Texte du paragraphe 18.26(1) :
18.26 (1) Dans sa décision d’accueillir un appel visé à l’article 18, la Cour :
a) rembourse à l’appelant le droit de dépôt qu’il a acquitté en vertu de l’alinéa 18.15(3)b);
b) peut, conformément aux modalités prévues par ses règles, allouer les frais et dépens à l’appelant si le jugement réduit de plus de la moitié le total des montants en cause ou le montant des intérêts en cause, ou augmente de plus de la moitié le montant de la perte en cause.
Costs
18.26 (1) The Court may, subject to the rules, award costs. In particular, the Court may award costs to the appellant if the judgment reduces the aggregate of all amounts in issue or the amount of interest in issue, or increases the amount of loss in issue, as the case may be, by more than one half.
R.S., c. 51 (4th Supp.) s. 5; 1990, c. 45, s. 59; 1998, c. 19, s. 294
33. Section 18.27 of the Act is replaced by the following:
Clause 33: Existing text of section 18.27:
18.27 The Governor in Council may make regulations
(a) increasing the amount of $7,000 referred to in paragraph 18(1)(a), section 18.1, subsections 18.11(2) and (3) and sections 18.12 and 18.13 to any amount that does not exceed $12,000;
(b) increasing the amount of $14,000 referred to in paragraph 18(1)(b) and sections 18.1, 18.12 and 18.13 to any amount that does not exceed $24,000;
(c) increasing the amount of $7,000 referred to in paragraphs 18.3002(3)(a), 18.3008(a) and 18.3009(1)(a) to any amount that does not exceed $12,000; and
(d) varying the amount of $100 referred to in paragraph 18.15(3)(b).
Article 33 : Texte de l’article 18.27 :
18.27 Le gouverneur en conseil peut, par règlement :
a) hausser le montant de 7 000 $ mentionné à l’alinéa 18(1)a), à l’article 18.1, aux paragraphes 18.11(2) et (3) et aux articles 18.12 et 18.13, sans toutefois dépasser 12 000 $;
b) hausser le montant de 14 000 $ mentionné à l’alinéa 18(1)b) et aux articles 18.1, 18.12 et 18.13, sans toutefois dépasser 24 000 $;
c) hausser le montant de 7 000 $ mentionné aux alinéas 18.3002(3)a), 18.3008a) et 18.3009(1)a), sans toutefois dépasser 12 000 $;
d) modifier le montant de 100 $ mentionné à l’alinéa 18.15(3)b).
Regulations
18.27 The Governor in Council may make regulations increasing the amount in dispute referred to in paragraphs 18.3002(3)(c) and 18.3008(c) and subparagraph 18.3009(1)(c)(i) to any amount that does not exceed $12,000.
1998, c. 19, s. 295(1)
34. The portion of subsection 18.29(1) of the Act before paragraph (a) is replaced by the following:
Clause 34: Relevant portion of subsection 18.29(1):
18.29 (1) The provisions of section 18.14, subsections 18.15(1) and (2), paragraph 18.15(3)(a), subsections 18.15(3.1) to (3.3) and (4), paragraph 18.18(1)(a), section 18.19, subsection 18.22(3) and sections 18.23 and 18.24 apply, with such modifications as the circumstances require, in respect of appeals arising under
Article 34 : Texte du passage visé du paragraphe 18.29(1) :
18.29 (1) L’article 18.14, les paragraphes 18.15(1) et (2), l’alinéa 18.15(3)a), les paragraphes 18.15(3.1) à (3.3) et (4) et 18.18(1), l’article 18.19, le paragraphe 18.22(3) ainsi que les articles 18.23 et 18.24 s’appliquent, avec les adaptations nécessaires, aux appels interjetés sous le régime des dispositions suivantes :
Other applications
18.29 (1) The provisions of sections 18.14 and 18.15 — other than the reference to filing fees —, subsection 18.18(1), section 18.19, subsection 18.22(3) and sections 18.23 and 18.24 apply, with any modifications that the circumstances require, in respect of appeals arising under
2002, c. 22, s. 408(15)
35. The portion of subsection 18.3009(1) of the Act before paragraph (a) is replaced by the following:
Clause 35: Relevant portion of subsection 18.3009(1):
18.3009 (1) If an appeal referred to in section 18.3001 is allowed, the Court shall reimburse to the person who brought the appeal the filing fee paid by that person under paragraph 18.15(3)(b). The Court may, in accordance with the rules of Court, award costs to that person if the judgement reduces the amount in dispute by more than one half and
Article 35 : Texte du passage visé du paragraphe 18.3009(1) :
18.3009 (1) Dans sa décision d’accueillir un appel visé à l’article 18.3001, la Cour rembourse à la personne qui a interjeté appel le droit de dépôt qu’elle a acquitté en vertu de l’alinéa 18.15(3)b) et peut, conformément aux modalités prévues par ses règles, allouer les frais et dépens à cette personne si :
Costs
18.3009 (1) In an appeal referred to in section 18.3001, the Court may, subject to the rules of Court, award costs. In particular, the Court may award costs to the person who brought the appeal if the judgment reduces the amount in dispute by more than one half and
2002, c. 8, s. 77
36. The English version of subsection 19.2(3) of the Act is replaced by the following:
Clause 36: Existing text of subsection 19.2(3):
(3) The Attorney General of Canada and the attorney general of each province are entitled to notice of any appeal to the Federal Court of Appeal made in respect of the constitutional question.
Article 36 : Texte du paragraphe 19.2(3) :
(3) Les avis d’appel portant sur une question constitutionnelle sont à signifier au procureur général du Canada et à ceux des provinces.
Notice of appeal
(3) The Attorney General of Canada and the attorney general of each province are entitled to notice of any appeal made in respect of the constitutional question.
2002, c. 7
Yukon Act
37. Subsection 5(2) of the Yukon Act is replaced by the following:
Yukon Act
Clause 37: Existing text of subsection 5(2):
(2) The senior judge, within the meaning of subsection 22(3) of the Judges Act, of the Supreme Court of Yukon may act as Administrator during the Administrator’s absence or illness or other inability or when that office is vacant.
Loi sur le Yukon
Article 37 : Texte du paragraphe 5(2) :
(2) En cas d’absence ou d’empêchement de l’administrateur ou de vacance de son poste, l’intérim est assuré par le juge principal — au sens du paragraphe 22(3) de la Loi sur les juges — de la Cour suprême du Yukon.
Absence or inability
(2) The Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Yukon may act as Administrator during the Administrator’s absence or illness or other inability or when that office is vacant.
COMING INTO FORCE
Order in council
38. (1) Subsections 3(2) to (4) and sections 30 to 32, 34 and 35 come into force on a day or days to be fixed by order of the Governor in Council.
Provisions related to territorial judges
(2) Section 1, subsections 3(5), 7(3) and (5) and 9(2) and (3), and sections 22, 25 and 37 come into force on the day on which the last of subsections 3(2) to (4) comes into force.
Order in council
(3) Section 14 comes into force on a day to be fixed by order of the Governor in Council.
Section 44.2 of the Judges Act
39. Section 44.2 of the Judges Act, as enacted by section 163 of the Modernization of Benefits and Obligations Act, chapter 12 of the Statutes of Canada, 2000, and replaced by section 24 of An Act to amend the Judges Act and to amend another Act in consequence, chapter 7 of the Statutes of Canada, 2001, and the Optional Survivor Annuity Regulations, made by Order in Council P.C. 2001-1362 on August 1, 2001 and registered as SOR/2001-283, are deemed to have come into force on August 1, 2001.
Published under authority of the Speaker of the House of CommonsAvailable from:Publishing and Depository ServicesPublic Works and Government Services Canada