C-53
Third Session, Fortieth Parliament,
59 Elizabeth II, 2010
HOUSE OF COMMONS OF CANADA
BILL C-53
An Act to amend the Criminal Code (mega-trials)
first reading, November 2, 2010
MINISTER OF JUSTICE
90586
SUMMARY
This enactment amends the Criminal Code to
(a) allow for the appointment of a judge as a case management judge;
(b) define the role and the powers of a case management judge;
(c) streamline the use of direct indictments preferred under section 577;
(d) allow for delayed severance orders;
(e) improve the protection of the identity of jurors;
(f) increase the maximum number of jurors who can hear the evidence on the merits; and
(g) provide that, in the case of a mistrial, certain decisions made during the trial are binding on the parties in any new trial.
Also available on the Parliament of Canada Web Site at the following address:http://www.parl.gc.ca
.vis1 {position: absolute;display:block;}
.vis2 {position: static;}
3rd Session, 40th Parliament,
59 Elizabeth II, 2010
house of commons of canada
BILL C-53
An Act to amend the Criminal Code (mega-trials)
Her Majesty, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate and House of Commons of Canada, enacts as follows:
SHORT TITLE
Short title
1. This Act may be cited as the Fair and Efficient Criminal Trials Act.
R.S., c. C-46
CRIMINAL CODE
2. (1) Section 523 of the Criminal Code is amended by adding the following after subsection (1.1):
Explanatory NotesCriminal Code
Clause 2: (1) New.
Notes explicativesCode criminel
Article 2 : (1) Nouveau.
When direct indictment is preferred charging same offence
(1.2) When an accused, in respect of an offence with which the accused is charged, has not been taken into custody or is being detained or has been released from custody under or by virtue of any provision of this Part and after the order for interim release or detention has been made, or the appearance notice, promise to appear, summons, undertaking or recognizance has been issued, given or entered into, and an indictment is preferred under section 577 charging the same offence or an included offence, the order for interim release or detention of the accused and the appearance notice, promise to appear, summons, undertaking or recognizance, if any, applies in respect of the indictment.
R.S., c. 27(1st Supp.), s. 89(4)
(2) The portion of subsection 523(2) of the Act before paragraph (a) is replaced by the following:
(2) Relevant portion of subsection 523(2):
(2) Notwithstanding subsections (1) and (1.1),
(2) Texte du passage visé du paragraphe 523(2) :
(2) Nonobstant les paragraphes (1) et (1.1) :
Order vacating previous order for release or detention
(2) Despite subsections (1) to (1.2),
2002, c. 13, s. 27
3. Paragraphs 536.3(a) and (b) of the French version of the Act are replaced by the following:
Clause 3: Existing text of section 536.3:
536.3 If a request for a preliminary inquiry is made, the prosecutor or, if the request was made by the accused, counsel for the accused shall, within the period fixed by rules of court made under section 482 or 482.1 or, if there are no such rules, by the justice, provide the court and the other party with a statement that identifies
(a) the issues on which the requesting party wants evidence to be given at the inquiry; and
(b) the witnesses that the requesting party wants to hear at the inquiry.
Article 3 : Texte de l’article 536.3 :
536.3 En cas de demande d’enquête préliminaire, le poursuivant ou, si la demande a été faite par le prévenu, l’avocat de ce dernier doit, dans le délai prévu par les règles établies en vertu des articles 482 ou 482.1, ou, en l’absence de règles, dans le délai fixé par le juge de paix, fournir au tribunal et à l’autre partie une déclaration énonçant :
a) les points sur lesquels la partie faisant la demande veut présenter des témoignages dans le cadre de l’enquête;
b) le nom des témoins que la partie faisant la demande veut faire entendre à l’enquête.
a) les points sur lesquels la partie faisant la demande veut que des témoignages soient présentés dans le cadre de l’enquête;
b) le nom des témoins que la partie faisant la demande veut entendre à l’enquête.
4. The Act is amended by adding the following after section 551:
Clause 4: New.
Article 4 : Nouveau.
PART XVIII.1
CASE MANAGEMENT JUDGE
Appointment
551.1 (1) On application by the prosecutor or the accused or on his or her own motion, the Chief Justice of the court before which a trial is to be or is being held or the judge that the Chief Justice designates may, if he or she is of the opinion that it is necessary for the proper administration of justice, appoint a judge as the case management judge for that trial at any time before the jury selection, if the trial is before a judge and jury, or before the stage at which the evidence on the merits is presented, if the trial is being heard by a judge without a jury or a provincial court judge.
Conference or hearing
(2) The Chief Justice or his or her designate may order that a conference between the prosecutor and the accused or counsel for the accused or a hearing be held for the purpose of deciding if it is necessary for the proper administration of justice to proceed with the appointment.
Timing of application or appointment
(3) In the case of a trial for an indictable offence, other than a trial before a provincial court judge, the application or appointment may only be made after the prosecution prefers the indictment.
Same judge
(4) The appointment of a judge as the case management judge does not prevent him or her from becoming the judge who hears the evidence on the merits.
Role
551.2 The case management judge shall assist in promoting a fair and efficient trial, including by ensuring that the evidence on the merits is presented, to the extent possible, without interruption.
Powers before evidence on merits presented
551.3 (1) In performing his or her duties before the stage of the presentation of the evidence on the merits, the case management judge, as a trial judge, may exercise the powers that a trial judge has before that stage, including
(a) assisting the parties to identify the witnesses to be heard, taking into account the witnesses’ needs and circumstances;
(b) encouraging the parties to make admissions and reach agreements;
(c) encouraging the parties to consider any other matters that would promote a fair and efficient trial;
(d) establishing schedules and imposing deadlines on the parties;
(e) hearing guilty pleas and imposing sentences;
(f) assisting the parties to identify the issues that are to be dealt with at the stage at which the evidence on the merits is presented; and
(g) subject to section 551.7, adjudicating any issues that can be decided before that stage, including those related to
(i) the disclosure of evidence,
(ii) the admissibility of evidence,
(iii) the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms,
(iv) expert witnesses,
(v) the severance of counts, and
(vi) the separation of trials on one or more counts when there is more than one accused.
Hearing
(2) The case management judge shall order that a hearing be held for the purpose of exercising the power referred to in paragraph (1)(g).
Power exercised at trial
(3) When the case management judge exercises the power referred to in paragraph (1)(g), he or she is doing so at trial.
Decision binding
(4) A decision that results from the exercise of the power referred to in paragraph (1)(g) is binding on the parties for the remainder of the trial, even if the judge who hears the evidence on the merits is not the same as the case management judge.
Information relevant to presentation of evidence on merits to be part of court record
551.4 (1) When the case management judge is of the opinion that the measures to promote a fair and efficient trial that can be taken before the stage of the presentation of the evidence on the merits have been taken — including adjudicating the issues that can be decided — he or she shall ensure that the court record includes information that, in his or her opinion, may be relevant at the stage of the presentation of the evidence on the merits, including
(a) the names of the witnesses to be heard that have been identified by the parties;
(b) any admissions made and agreements reached by the parties;
(c) the estimated time required to conclude the trial;
(d) any orders and decisions; and
(e) any issues identified by the parties that are to be dealt with at the stage of the presentation of the evidence on the merits.
Exception
(2) This section does not apply to a case management judge who also hears the evidence on the merits.
Trial continuous
551.5 Even if the judge who hears the evidence on the merits is not the same as the case management judge, the trial of an accused shall proceed continuously, subject to adjournment by the court.
Issues referred to case management judge
551.6 (1) During the presentation of the evidence on the merits, the case management judge shall adjudicate any issue referred to him or her by the judge hearing the evidence on the merits.
Powers at stage of presentation of evidence on merits
(2) For the purposes of adjudicating an issue, the case management judge may exercise the powers of a trial judge.
Decision whether to hold joint hearing
551.7 (1) If an issue referred to in any of subparagraphs 551.3(1)(g)(i) to (iii) is to be adjudicated in related trials that are to be or are being held in the same province before a court of the same jurisdiction, the Chief Justice of that court or his or her designate may, on application by the prosecutor or the accused or on his or her own motion, determine if it is in the interests of justice, including ensuring consistent decisions, to adjudicate that issue at a joint hearing for some or all of those trials.
Considerations
(2) To make the determination, the Chief Justice or his or her designate
(a) shall take into account, among other considerations, the degree to which the evidence relating to the issue is similar in the related trials; and
(b) may order that a conference between the prosecutor and the accused or counsel for the accused or a hearing be held.
Order for joint hearing
(3) If the Chief Justice or his or her designate determines that it is in the interests of justice to adjudicate the issue at a joint hearing for some or all of the related trials, he or she shall issue an order
(a) declaring that a joint hearing be held to adjudicate the issue in the related trials that he or she specifies;
(b) naming the parties who are to appear at the hearing;
(c) appointing a judge to adjudicate the issue; and
(d) designating the territorial division in which the hearing is to be held, if the trials are being held in different territorial divisions.
Limitation — indictable offence
(4) However, the order may only be made in respect of a trial for an indictable offence, other than a trial before a provincial court judge, if the indictment has been preferred.
Order in court record and transmission to parties
(5) The Chief Justice or his or her designate shall cause a copy of the order to be included in the court record of each of the trials specified in the order and to be provided to each of the parties named in it.
Transmission of court record
(6) If one of the specified trials is being held in a territorial division other than the one in which the joint hearing will be held, the officer in that territorial division who has custody of the indictment or information and the writings relating to the trial shall, when he or she receives the order, transmit the indictment or information and the writings without delay to the clerk of the court before which the joint hearing is to be held.
Order to appear at joint hearing
(7) The judge appointed under the order shall require the parties who are named in it to appear at the joint hearing.
Removal of prisoner
(8) The order made under subsection (2) or (3) is sufficient warrant, justification and authority to all sheriffs, keepers of prisons and peace officers for an accused’s removal, disposal and reception in accordance with the terms of the order, and the sheriff may appoint and authorize any peace officer to convey the accused to a prison for the territorial division in which the hearing, as the case may be, is to be held.
Powers of judge
(9) The judge appointed under the order may, as a trial judge and for the purpose of adjudicating the issue at the joint hearing, exercise the powers of a trial judge.
Adjudication at trial
(10) When the judge adjudicates the issue, he or she is doing so at trial.
Decision in court records and return of documents
(11) Once the judge has adjudicated the issue, he or she shall cause his or her decision, with reasons, to be included in the court record of each of the related trials in respect of which the joint hearing was held and, in the case of a trial for which an indictment, information or writings were transmitted by an officer under subsection (6), the judge shall have the documents returned to the officer.
5. Section 591 of the Act is amended by adding the following after subsection (4):
Clause 5: New.
Article 5 : Nouveau.
Delayed enforcement
(4.1) The court may make an order under subsection (3) that takes effect either at a specified later date or on the occurrence of a specified event if, taking into account, among other considerations, the need to ensure consistent decisions, it is satisfied that it is in the interests of justice to do so.
Decisions binding on parties
(4.2) Unless the court is satisfied that it would not be in the interests of justice, the decisions relating to the disclosure or admissibility of evidence or the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms that are made before any order issued under subsection (3) takes effect continue to bind the parties if the decisions are made — or could have been made — before the stage at which the evidence on the merits is presented.
R.S., c. 27 (1st Supp.), s. 123(1)
6. Subsection 601(1) of the Act is replaced by the following:
Clause 6: Existing text of subsection 601(1):
601. (1) An objection to an indictment or to a count in an indictment for a defect apparent on the face thereof shall be taken by motion to quash the indictment or count before the accused has pleaded, and thereafter only by leave of the court before which the proceedings take place, and the court before which an objection is taken under this section may, if it considers it necessary, order the indictment or count to be amended to cure the defect.
Article 6 : Texte du paragraphe 601(1) :
601. (1) Une objection à un acte d’accusation ou à un de ses chefs d’accusation, pour un vice de forme apparent à sa face même, est présentée par requête pour faire annuler l’acte ou le chef d’accusation, avant que le prévenu ait plaidé, et, par la suite, seulement sur permission du tribunal devant lequel se déroulent les procédures, et un tribunal devant lequel une objection est présentée aux termes du présent article peut, si la chose lui paraît nécessaire, ordonner que l’acte ou le chef d’accusation soit modifié afin de remédier au vice indiqué.
Amending defective indictment or count
601. (1) An objection to an indictment preferred under this Part or to a count in an indictment, for a defect apparent on its face, shall be taken by motion to quash the indictment or count before the accused enters a plea, and, after the accused has entered a plea, only by leave of the court before which the proceedings take place. The court before which an objection is taken under this section may, if it considers it necessary, order the indictment or count to be amended to cure the defect.
7. (1) Section 631 of the Act is amended by adding the following after subsection (2.1):
Clause 7: (1) New.
Article 7 : (1) Nouveau.
Additional jurors
(2.2) If the judge considers it advisable in the interests of justice, he or she may order that 13 or 14 jurors, instead of 12, be sworn in accordance with this Part before the clerk of the court draws out the cards under subsection (3) or (3.1).
2001, c. 32, s. 82(4)
(2) Subsections 631(3) and (3.1) of the Act are replaced by the following:
(2) Existing text of subsections 631(3) and (3.1):
(3) The clerk of the court shall, in open court, draw out the cards referred to in subsection (1), one after another, and shall call out the name and number on each card as it is drawn, until the number of persons who have answered is, in the opinion of the judge, sufficient to provide a full jury and any alternate jurors ordered by the judge after allowing for orders to excuse, challenges and directions to stand by where
(a) the array of jurors is not challenged; or
(b) the array of jurors is challenged but the judge does not direct a new panel to be returned.
(3.1) On application by the prosecutor or on its own motion, the court, or a judge of the court, before which the jury trial is to be held, if it is satisfied that it is in the best interest of the administration of justice to do so, including in order to protect the privacy or safety of the members of the jury and alternate jurors, may order that, for the purposes of subsection (3), the clerk of the court shall only call out the number on each card.
(2) Texte des paragraphes 631(3) et (3.1) :
(3) Si le tableau des jurés n’est pas récusé, ou s’il l’est mais que le juge n’ordonne pas la présentation d’une nouvelle liste, le greffier du tribunal tire, en pleine audience, l’une après l’autre les cartes mentionnées au paragraphe (1) et appelle les nom et numéro inscrits sur chaque carte au fur et à mesure que les cartes sont tirées, jusqu’à ce que le nombre de personnes ayant répondu soit, de l’avis du juge, suffisant pour constituer un jury complet et pourvoir les postes de jurés suppléants le cas échéant, après qu’il a été pourvu aux dispenses, aux récusations et aux mises à l’écart.
(3.1) Sur demande du poursuivant ou de sa propre initiative, le tribunal ou le juge du tribunal devant qui doit se tenir le procès avec jury peut, s’il estime que cela est dans l’intérêt de la bonne administration de la justice, et notamment en vue d’assurer la sécurité des jurés ou la confidentialité de leur identité, ordonner que seul le numéro inscrit sur la carte soit appelé par le greffier dans le cadre du paragraphe (3).
Cards to be drawn by clerk of court
(3) If the array of jurors is not challenged or the array of jurors is challenged but the judge does not direct a new panel to be returned, the clerk of the court shall, in open court, draw out one after another the cards referred to in subsection (1), call out the number on each card as it is drawn and confirm with the person who responds that he or she is the person whose name appears on the card drawn, until the number of persons who have answered is, in the opinion of the judge, sufficient to provide a full jury and any alternate jurors ordered by the judge after allowing for orders to excuse, challenges and directions to stand by.
Exception
(3.1) The court, or a judge of the court, before which the jury trial is to be held may, if the court or judge is satisfied that it is necessary for the proper administration of justice, order the clerk of the court to call out the name and the number on each card.
2001, c. 32, s. 82(4)
(3) Subsection 631(5) of the Act is replaced by the following:
(3) and (4) Existing text of subsections 631(5) and (6):
(5) If the number of persons who answer under subsection (3) or (3.1) is not sufficient to provide a full jury and the number of alternate jurors ordered by the judge, the clerk of the court shall proceed in accordance with subsections (3), (3.1) and (4) until twelve jurors and any alternate jurors are sworn.
(6) On application by the prosecutor or on its own motion, the court or judge before which a jury trial is to be held may, if an order under subsection (3.1) has been made, make an order directing that the identity of a juror or any information that could disclose their identity shall not be published in any document or broadcast or transmitted in any way if the court or judge is satisfied that such an order is necessary for the proper administration of justice.
(3) et (4) Texte des paragraphes 631(5) et (6) :
(5) Lorsque le nombre de ceux qui ont répondu à l’appel en conformité avec les paragraphes (3) ou (3.1) ne suffit pas pour constituer un jury complet et pourvoir les postes de jurés suppléants le cas échéant, le greffier du tribunal procède en conformité avec les paragraphes (3), (3.1) et (4) jusqu’à ce que douze jurés et les jurés suppléants soient assermentés.
(6) Sur demande du poursuivant ou de sa propre initiative, le tribunal ou le juge du tribunal devant qui doit se tenir le procès avec jury peut, s’il a rendu une ordonnance au titre du paragraphe (3.1), interdire de publier ou de diffuser de quelque façon que ce soit l’identité des jurés ou des renseignements qui permettraient de la découvrir, s’il est convaincu que la bonne administration de la justice l’exige.
Drawing additional cards if necessary
(5) If the number of persons who answer under subsection (3) or (3.1) is not sufficient to provide a full jury and the number of alternate jurors ordered by the judge, the clerk of the court shall proceed in accordance with subsections (3), (3.1) and (4) until 12 jurors — or 13 or 14 jurors, as the case may be, if the judge makes an order under subsection (2.2) — and any alternate jurors are sworn.
2005, c. 32, s. 20
(4) Subsection 631(6) of the Act is replaced by the following:
Ban on publication, limitation to access or use of information
(6) On application by the prosecutor or on its own motion, the court or judge before which a jury trial is to be held may, if the court or judge is satisfied that such an order is necessary for the proper administration of justice, make an order
(a) directing that the identity of a juror or any information that could disclose their identity shall not be published in any document or broadcast or transmitted in any way; or
(b) limiting access to or the use of that information.
8. Section 634 of the Act is amended by adding the following after subsection (2):
Clause 8: New.
Article 8 : Nouveau.
If 13 or 14 jurors
(2.01) If the judge orders under subsection 631(2.2) that 13 or 14 jurors be sworn in accordance with this Part, the total number of peremptory challenges that the prosecutor and the accused are each entitled to is increased by one in the case of 13 jurors or two in the case of 14 jurors.
2008, c. 18, s. 26
9. Subsection 640(2.2) of the Act is replaced by the following:
Clause 9: Existing text of subsection 640(2.2):
(2.2) If an order is made under subsection (2.1), two unsworn jurors, who are then exempt from the order, or two persons present who are appointed by the court for that purpose, shall be sworn to determine whether the ground of challenge is true. Those persons so appointed shall exercise their duties until twelve jurors and any alternate jurors are sworn.
Article 9 : Texte du paragraphe 640(2.2) :
(2.2) Dans le cas où une ordonnance a été rendue en vertu du paragraphe (2.1), deux jurés non assermentés, dès lors soustraits à l’ordonnance, ou deux personnes présentes que le tribunal peut nommer à cette fin sont assermentés pour vérifier si le motif de récusation est fondé. Les vérificateurs ainsi nommés conservent leurs fonctions jusqu’à ce que douze jurés et les jurés suppléants soient assermentés.
Exclusion order
(2.2) If an order is made under subsection (2.1), two unsworn jurors, who are then exempt from the order, or two persons present who are appointed by the court for that purpose, shall be sworn to determine whether the ground of challenge is true. Those persons so appointed shall exercise their duties until 12 jurors — or 13 or 14 jurors, as the case may be, if the judge makes an order under subsection 631(2.2) — and any alternate jurors are sworn.
2001, c. 32, s. 41; 2002, c. 13, s. 55
10. Section 641 of the Act is replaced by the following:
Clause 10: Existing text of section 641:
641. (1) If a full jury and any alternate jurors have not been sworn and no names remain to be called, the names of those who have been directed to stand by shall be called again in the order in which their names were drawn and the jurors necessary to make a full jury and any alternate jurors shall be sworn, unless excused by the judge or challenged by the accused or the prosecutor.
(2) Where, before a juror is sworn pursuant to subsection (1), other jurors in the panel become available, the prosecutor may require the cards of those jurors to be put into and drawn from the box in accordance with section 631, and those jurors shall be challenged, directed to stand by, excused or sworn, as the case may be, before the jurors who were originally directed to stand by are called again.
Article 10 : Texte de l’article 641 :
641. (1) Lorsque les jurés formant un jury complet et tous les jurés suppléants, le cas échéant, n’ont pas été assermentés et qu’il ne reste plus de noms à appeler, les noms de ceux à qui il a été ordonné de se tenir à l’écart sont de nouveau appelés suivant l’ordre dans lequel ils ont été tirés; ces jurés sont assermentés, à moins qu’ils ne soient dispensés par le juge ou récusés par le prévenu ou le poursuivant.
(2) Si, avant qu’un juré soit assermenté selon le paragraphe (1), d’autres jurés figurant sur la liste deviennent disponibles, le poursuivant peut demander que leurs cartes soient déposées dans la boîte et en soient tirées conformément à l’article 631; ils sont dispensés, récusés, mis à l’écart ou assermentés avant que les noms ou numéros des jurés mis à l’écart en premier lieu soient appelés de nouveau.
Calling persons who have stood by
641. (1) If a full jury and any alternate jurors have not been sworn and no cards remain to be drawn, the persons who have been directed to stand by shall be called again in the order in which their cards were drawn and shall be sworn, unless excused by the judge or challenged by the accused or the prosecutor.
Other persons becoming available
(2) If, before a person is sworn as a juror under subsection (1), other persons in the panel become available, the prosecutor may require the cards of those persons to be put into and drawn from the box in accordance with section 631, and those persons shall be challenged, directed to stand by, excused or sworn, as the case may be, before the persons who were originally directed to stand by are called again.
2002, c. 13, s. 57
11. Subsection 642.1(1) of the Act is replaced by the following:
Clause 11: Existing text of subsection 642.1(1):
642.1 (1) Alternate jurors shall attend at the commencement of the trial and, if there is not a full jury present, alternate jurors shall be substituted, in the order in which their names were drawn under subsection 631(3), until there are twelve jurors.
Article 11 : Texte du paragraphe 642.1(1) :
642.1 (1) Les jurés suppléants sont tenus de se présenter le jour du début du procès. Le cas échéant, ils prennent la place des jurés absents, selon l’ordre dans lequel leur nom a été tiré en application du paragraphe 631(3).
Substitution of alternate jurors
642.1 (1) Alternate jurors shall attend at the commencement of the presentation of the evidence on the merits and, if there is not a full jury present, shall replace any absent juror, in the order in which their cards were drawn under subsection 631(3).
2002, c. 13, s. 58
12. Subsection 643(1) of the Act is replaced by the following:
Clause 12: Existing text of subsection 643(1):
643. (1) The twelve jurors who are sworn in accordance with this Part and present at the commencement of the trial shall be the jury to try the issues of the indictment.
Article 12 : Texte du paragraphe 643(1) :
643. (1) Les douze jurés qui sont assermentés en conformité avec la présente partie et qui sont présents au début du procès constituent le jury qui juge les points de l’acte d’accusation.
Who shall be the jury
643. (1) The 12, 13 or 14 jurors who are sworn in accordance with this Part and present at the commencement of the presentation of the evidence on the merits shall be the jury to hear the evidence on the merits.
13. The Act is amended by adding the following after section 652:
Clause 13: New.
Article 13 : Nouveau.
Trying of issues of indictment by jury
652.1 (1) After the charge to the jury, the jury shall retire to try the issues of the indictment.
Reduction of number of jurors to 12
(2) However, if there are more than 12 jurors remaining, the judge shall identify the 12 jurors who are to retire to consider the verdict by having the number of each juror written on a card that is of equal size, by causing the cards to be placed together in a box that is to be thoroughly shaken together and by drawing one card if 13 jurors remain or two cards if 14 jurors remain. The judge shall then discharge any juror whose number is drawn.
14. The Act is amended by adding the following after section 653:
Clause 14: New.
Article 14 : Nouveau.
Mistrial — rulings binding at new trial
653.1 In the case of a mistrial, unless the court is satisfied that it would not be in the interests of justice, rulings relating to the disclosure or admissibility of evidence or the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms that were made during the trial are binding on the parties in any new trial if the rulings are made — or could have been made — before the stage at which the evidence on the merits is presented.
1994, c. 44, s. 65
15. Subsections 669.2(3) and (4) of the Act are replaced by the following:
Clause 15: Existing text of subsections 669.2(3) and (4):
(3) Subject to subsections (4) and (5), where the trial was commenced but no adjudication was made or verdict rendered, the judge, provincial court judge, justice or other person before whom the proceedings are continued shall, without further election by an accused, commence the trial again as if no evidence had been taken.
(4) Where a trial that is before a court composed of a judge and a jury was commenced but no adjudication was made or verdict rendered, the judge before whom the proceedings are continued may, without further election by an accused,
(a) continue the trial; or
(b) commence the trial again as if no evidence had been taken.
Article 15 : Texte des paragraphes 669.2(3) et (4) :
(3) Sous réserve des paragraphes (4) et (5), lorsque le procès a débuté et qu’aucune décision ni aucun verdict n’a été rendu, le juge, le juge de la cour provinciale, le juge de paix ou l’autre personne devant qui les procédures se poursuivent doit, sans nouveau choix de la part de l’accusé, recommencer le procès comme si aucune preuve n’avait été présentée.
(4) Lorsque le procès a débuté devant un tribunal composé d’un juge et d’un jury et qu’aucune décision ni aucun verdict n’a été rendu, le juge devant qui les procédures se poursuivent peut, sans nouveau choix de la part de l’accusé, continuer les procédures ou recommencer le procès comme si aucune preuve n’avait été présentée.
If no adjudication made
(3) Subject to subsections (4) and (5), if the trial was commenced but no adjudication was made or verdict rendered, the judge, provincial court judge, justice or other person before whom the proceedings are continued shall, without further election by an accused, commence the trial again as if no evidence on the merits had been taken.
If no adjudication is made — jury trials
(4) If a trial that is before a court composed of a judge and a jury was commenced but no adjudication was made or verdict rendered, the judge before whom the proceedings are continued may, without further election by an accused, continue the trial or commence the trial again as if no evidence on the merits had been taken.
1991, c. 43, s. 7
16. Section 795 of the Act is replaced by the following:
Clause 16: Existing text of section 795:
795. The provisions of Parts XVI and XVIII with respect to compelling the appearance of an accused before a justice, and the provisions of Parts XX and XX.1, in so far as they are not inconsistent with this Part, apply, with such modifications as the circumstances require, to proceedings under this Part.
Article 16 : Texte de l’article 795 :
795. Les dispositions des parties XVI et XVIII concernant les moyens de contraindre un prévenu à comparaître devant un juge de paix, et celles de la partie XX et XX.1, dans la mesure où elles ne sont pas incompatibles avec la présente partie, s’appliquent, avec les adaptations nécessaires, aux procédures prévues par la présente partie.
Application of Parts XVI, XVIII, XVIII.1, XX and XX.1
795. The provisions of Parts XVI and XVIII with respect to compelling the appearance of an accused before a justice, and the provisions of Parts XVIII.1, XX and XX.1, in so far as they are not inconsistent with this Part, apply, with any necessary modifications, to proceedings under this Part.
COMING INTO FORCE
Order in council
17. (1) Sections 1 to 6, subsections 7(2) and (4) and sections 10, 11 and 14 to 16 come into force on a day to be fixed by order of the Governor in Council.
Order in council
(2) Subsections 7(1) and (3) and sections 8, 9, 12 and 13 come into force on a day to be fixed by order of the Governor in Council.
Published under authority of the Speaker of the House of CommonsAvailable from:Publishing and Depository ServicesPublic Works and Government Services Canada